alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-55498, 333-51234 and 333-94357) of Insignia
Solutions plc and incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-51760, 333-34632, 333-76693, 33-99296 and 33-99592) of
Insignia Solutions plc of our report dated January 20, 2001 relating to the
financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K/A. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated January 20, 2001 relating to the
financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
-----------------------------------

San Jose, CA
May 24, 2001
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-74642A; File No. SR-NYSE-2014-59]

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Securities and Exchange Commission published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 9, 2015, concerning a Notice of Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Partial Amendment No. 1, Amending Rule 13 and Related Rules Governing Order Types and Modifiers. The document contained a typographical error.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steve Kuan, Division of Trading and Markets, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, (202) 551-5624.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 9, 2015 in FR Doc. 2015-8107, on page 19097, in the fourth line in the first column, correct the date “February 26, 2014” to “February 26, 2015.”                    

Dated: April 9, 2015.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015-08628 Filed 4-14-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,129
<INVENTORY>                                     48,462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,271
<PP&E>                                         132,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,267
<BONDS>                                        158,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           16,999
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   304,475
<SALES>                                        225,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,036
<CGS>                                          135,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   288
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,588
<INCOME-TAX>                                       635
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,928
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 07, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0195. JONES LANG LASALLE OPERATIONS, LLC et al. v. DAN JOHNSON.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16EV002713
Enclosure 3

Evidence of Public Hearing to consider approval of the Revisions to the 2007 PM2.5 

and Ozone State Implementation Plan for South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley

Enclosure 4

Attachment A

Public Hearing Notice

Notice of Public Hearing to Consider the Approval of a Progress Report and Proposed 

State Implementation Plan Revisions for PM2.5




Enclosure 4

Attachment B

Email Notification

Date: March 29, 2011

Subject: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider the Approval of a Progress Report and 

Proposed State Implementation Plan Revisions for PM2.5

Enclosure 4

Attachment C

Board Meeting Agenda
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3865 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3865

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Propanaminium, 3,3'-[(9,10-
  dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1,4-anthracenediyl)diimino]bis[N,N,N-triethyl-, 
                          bis(ethyl sulfate).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Propanaminium, 3,3'-[(9,10-
  dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1,4-anthracenediyl)diimino]bis[N,N,N-triethyl-, 
                          bis(ethyl sulfate).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-PROPANAMINIUM, 3,3'-[(9,10-DIHYDRO-9,10-DIOXO-1,4-
              ANTHRACENEDIYL)DIIMINO]BIS[N,N,N-TRIETHYL-, BIS(ETHYL 
              SULFATE).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      1-Propanaminium,    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        3,3'-[(9,10-                                                       31/2011.......
                        dihydro-9,10-
                        dioxo-1,4-
                        anthracenediyl)di
                        imino]bis[N,N,N-
                        triethyl-,
                        bis(ethyl
                        sulfate). (CAS
                        No. 67905-14-0)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  November 10, 2010








/s/ Frank Waung


---------------------


Name: Frank Waung


Title: Chief Financial Officer


(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    Exhibit 4.54

THIRD AMENDMENT TO SUPPLY CONTRACT FOR PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION OF RING
JASUKA BACKBONE NO.K.TEL 32/HK.920/UTA-00/2007, DATED 7 FEBRUARY 2007

<TABLE>
<S>                    <C>
Parties:               1.   TELKOM; and

                       2.   NEC-Siemens Consortium ("NEC").

Preceding Contracts:   1.   Main Contract - No.K.TEL.93/HK.910/UTA-00/2005 dated
                            10 June 2005;

                       2.   First Amendment - No.K.TEL.10/HK.920/UTA-00/2006
                            dated 6 February 2006;

                       3.   Second Amendment - No.K.TEL.61/HK.920/UTA-00/2006
                            dated 16 March 2006;

                       4.   Amendment No. 3 - No.Tel.248/HK.930/UTA-00/2004
                            dated 29 October 2004.

Amended Provisions:    1.   Article 2 of the Second Amendment, as follows: "The
                            entire Work under the Contract shall be completed as
                            follows:

                            a.   Each Sub-system of RING-I shall be completed as
                                 follows:

                                 -    Within 256 (two hundred fifty-six) days
                                      from EDC for Sub-system #1 - #2 or not
                                      later than February 21st, 2006;

                                 -    Within 273 (two hundred seventy-three)
                                      days from EDC for Sub-system #3 or not
                                      later than March 10th, 2006.

                            b.   Each Sub-system of RING-II shall be completed
                                 as follows:

                                 -    Within 284 (two hundred eighty-four) days
                                      from EDC for Sub-system #1 or not later
                                      than March 21st, 2006;

                                 -    Within 416 (four hundred sixteen) days
                                      from EDC for Sub-system #2 or not later
                                      than July 31st, 2006;

                                 -    Within 345 (three hundred forty-five) days
                                      from EDC for Sub-system #3 - #4 or not
                                      later than May 21st, 2006.
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<S>                    <C>
                       2.   Article 4.1 of the Second Amendment regarding
                            Contract Price.
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6446

CHARLES ALBERT HARRIS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, James River Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-97-722-3) Submitted: August 5, 1999 Decided: August 11, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Albert Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles Albert Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Warden, James River Correctional Ctr. , No. CA-97-722-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 9, 1999).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Pixar:

           We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Nos. 33-99838, 333-62047 and 333-30686) on Form S-8 of Pixar, of our
reports dated February 2, 2000, relating to the balance sheets of Pixar as of
January 2, 1999 and January 1, 2000, and the related statements of operations,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended January 1, 2000, and the related financial statement schedule,
which reports appear or are incorporated by reference in the January 1, 2000
annual report on Form 10-K of Pixar.

                                             /s/  KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California
March 29, 2000
LOUISIANA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (LAARNG) DRINKING WATER 

PFAS SNAPSHOT_CAMP MINDEN

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at,

does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army National Guard-provided 

drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), a federal 

law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the American public. The Army 

National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to ensure the EPA HA or a 

properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: December 2023

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect.

Future Testing Event: July 2026

Type of Drinking Water System: Camp Minden contains three deep water wells-constructed 

circa 1950.

For Questions Contact: Louisiana National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 225-803-6712

Office E-mail Address: ng.la.laarng.mbx.pao@mail.mil

Water quality report: A water quality report is/is not required for this location.
MICHAEL RODGERS

,
Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 0679

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed October 6, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mallory D. Cooper , Judge

.
Christopher J. Anderson, Court

- Appointed Counsel, Fourth Judicial Circuit, Neptune Beach , for Appellant,

Michael Rodgers , pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK

, WETHERELL

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
16609

#### THOMPSON v. S. C. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

(70 S. E. (2d) 241)

*251
      *Messrs. T. C. Callison, Attorney General,*and *William A. Dallis, Assistant Attorney General,*of Columbia, *for Appellant)*cite:

*Messrs. Nicholson & Nicholson,*of Greenwood, *for Respondent,*cite:

*254March 31, 1952.

OxnER, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order refusing a motion by appellant for a change of venue from Greenwood County to Greenville County. The facts disclosed by the supporting affidavits are clearly and correctly summarized in the order of the Court below, which will be reported. -

Appellant properly concedes the well established rule in this'State that a motion of this kind “is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the lower Court and its ruling will not be disturbed by this' Court except in cases of manifest error.” *Gregory v. Powell, Receivers,*206 S. C. 261, 33 S. E. (2d) 629, 631. Under the facts presented, we cannot say .that the refusal of appellant’s motion constituted’ a manifest abuse of discretion. The showing in this *255case for a change of venue is not as strong as that made in *Landrum v. State Highway*Department, 168 S. C. 139, 167 S. E. 164, where an order refusing a motion by the Highway Department for a change of venue was affirmed.

The only other question raised is appellant’s contention that the order appealed from precludes the Judge who tries the case from determining whether the jury should be permitted to view the scene of the accident. But we do not think the order has that effect. The Court’s observation to the effect that the photographic evidence presented is sufficient to adequately portray the scene of the accident was made in considering appellant’s contention that a change of venue was necessary so as to enable the jury to visit the locale. Nothing contained in the order under consideration should be construed as precluding the trial judge from determining, in the exercise of his discretion, whether the jury should be sent to the scene of the accident.

Affirmed.

Baker, C. J. and EishburnE, StukES and Tayeor, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of TS Electronics,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004
(the "Report"), I, Keith P. Boyd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 23, 2004

                                           /S/ KEITH P. BOYD
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Keith P. Boyd
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


         The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Doane Pet Care Company:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-43643 and 333-70759) of Doane Pet Care Company of our report
dated February 14, 2003, except as to Note 26, which is as of February 28, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Doane Pet Care Company
and Subsidiaries as of December 29, 2001 and December 28, 2002 and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholder's equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 28, 2002, which report is included in the Annual Report of Doane Pet
Care Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2002. Our report
refers to a change in accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets.




Nashville, Tennessee
February 28, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7325

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JUAN ANTONIO AGUILAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-00-330, CA-02-2529)

Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juan Antonio Aguilar, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Juan Antonio Aguilar seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons

stated by the district court that Aguilar has not made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See

United States v. Aguilar, Nos. CR-00-330; CA-02-2529 (D.S.C.

Aug. 16, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED