Winning the Battle - Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

FOREWORD

From the very beginnings of the Air National Guard in 1947 until 

today, our Airmen have been fueled by an innovative spirit that is the 

hallmark of our Air Force. Through this spirit, we have grown 

airpower into an ability to project global military power through air, 

space and cyberspace. We are the cornerstone of our Air Force and 

full participants across its core missions: Air and Space Superiority; 

Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance; Rapid Global 

Mobility; Global Strike; and Command and Control. These core 

missions are necessary to provide the integrated global power effects 

that only the United States Air Force can provide. 

Through the unique National Guard structure, the Air National Guard 

supports global requirements while remaining prepared to support 

domestic security and other homeland operations. Our Air National Guard requires innovative, 

affordable and technically sound capabilities combined with viable tactics to defeat challengers 

and threats that are constantly evolving. Our Nation’s adversaries seek capabilities and tactics to 

counter America’s dominance of air, space and cyberspace, and will pursue asymmetric 

advantages in different arenas such as electronic and cyber warfare. The capabilities contained 

within the 2014 Air National Guard Weapons Systems Modernization Priorities Book are based 

on validated Air Force and Combatant Commander requirements vetted through a forum of 

Reserve Component and Active Duty warfighters at our annual Weapons and Tactics 

Conference. The modernization programs in this book will continue to provide our warfighters 

the capabilities needed to remain ready and viable for any contingency. We must maintain our 

airpower advantage in order to deliver Global Vigilance, Global Reach and Global Power for 

America. 

STANLEY E. CLARKE III

Lieutenant General, USAF

Director, Air National Guard
Winning the Battle - Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Release Policy:

Information presented in this document is released to the public and may be distributed or 

copied; however, it is subject to change without notice. Neither the Air National Guard, nor any 

other Department of Defense agency, warrants the accuracy of any funding information 

contained in the document. 

There is a separate For Official Use Only (FOUO) Annex document. This Annex provides 

additional details such as a prioritization table and executive summaries.

All photographs are the property of the US Government, or used with permission, and are 

copyright free. Use of appropriate photo / image credits is requested.

Cover Art: NGB Graphics

If you have any questions or comments about the information presented here, please forward 

them to NGBA5.workflow@ang.af.mil for more information.
i

Winning the Battle - Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents i

Introduction v

Weapons Systems Reference Table by State vi

Contacts vii

TAB A - A-10 Thunderbolt II Overview 1

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 2

A-10 Improved Positive Identification 3

A-10 Operational Flight Program 4

A-10 Integrated Communications Suite 5

A-10 Improved Ability to Operate in a Contested and Degraded Operations Environment 6

A-10 Improved Ability to Employ from Austere Airfields 7

TAB B - Command and Control Overview 9

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 10

C2 Air and Space Operations Center Recurring Event 11 Upgrade 11

C2 Air and Space Operations Center Direct Operational Secure Voice Communication 12

C2 Air and Space Operations Center Trusted Thin Client - Single Pane of Glass 13

C2 Air and Space Operations Center Mission Network Access 14

C2 Control and Reporting Center Modular Tactical Electrical Power Mission Support Systems 15

C2 Control and Reporting Center Integrated Digital Mission Recording 16

C2 Control and Reporting Center Remote Voice Communications 17

C2 Air Defense Sector Battle Control Center Beyond Line-of-Sight Tactical Satellite Communications 18

C2 Air Defense Sector Battle Control Center Line-of-Sight Communications 19

TAB C - C-17 Globemaster III 21

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 22

C-17 Extended Range Fuel Tanks 23

C-17 Block 30 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures 24

C-17 Secure Line-of-Sight / Beyond Line-of-Sight Data Link and Internet Protocol Capability with 

Integrated Cockpit Display Unit 25

C-17 Heads-Up Countermeasures Dispenser Control 26

C-17 Integrated Class III Electronic Flight Bag 27

TAB D - C-130H/J Hercules Overview 29

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 30

C-130H Avionics Obsolescence and Global Airspace Access 31

C-130H Propulsion System Upgrades 32

C-130H Enhanced Situation Awareness 33

C-130H/J Improved Self-Protection 34

C-130H/J Single Pass Precision Airdrop 35

C-130J Aircraft Broker / Special Mission Processor 36

C-130J Tactical Plot Suite 37

C-130J Cargo Compartment Camera 38

TAB E - C-130 Special Mission Overview 39

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 40

EC-130J Communication / Situational Awareness Suite 41

EC-130J Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures 42

EC-130J Mission Information Support Operations System 43

EC-130J Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance 44

HC/MC-130P/N Integrated Beyond -Line-of-Sight / Secure Line-of-Sight Data Link 45

HC/MC-130P/N Information Superiority 46

HC/MC-130P/N Combat Penetrator Suite 47

HC/MC-130P/N Enhanced Engine and Propeller Performance 48

HC/MC-130P/N Mission Flexible Refueling and Airdrop Capability 49
ii

Winning the Battle - Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

LC-130H Propulsion Improvements 50

LC-130H Retractable External Arm and Crevasse Detection Radar 51

LC-130H Flight Deck Night Vision Goggle Compatibility 52

LC-130H Flight Deck Communications Upgrade 53

LC-130H Avionics Obsolescence and Global Airspace Access 54

TAB F - E-8C JSTARS and C-32B Gatekeeper Overview 55

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 56

E-8C Global Imagery Server 57

E-8C Integrated Broadcast Service Modernization 58

E-8C Integrated Personnel Recovery Compatible Interrogation Radio 59

E-8C Integrated Automatic Identification System 60

E-8C Network Centric Collaborative Targeting 61

C-32B Satellite Communications System with Secure Ku Bandwidth 62

C-32B Communications Management System Replacement 63

TAB G - F-15 Eagle and F-22 Raptor Overview 65

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 66

F-15 Active Electronically Scanned Array Radar 67

F-15 Persistent Air Dominance Enabler 68

F-15 Modernized Cockpit 69

F-15 Multi-Spectral Search / Target / Track System 70

F-15 Modernized Self-Protection Suite 71

TAB H - F-16 Fighting Falcon Overview 73

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 74

F-16 All Weather Air-to-Ground Self-Targeting and High Quality Coordinate Generation 75

F-16 Integrated Self-Protection and Threat Detection Suite 76

F-16 Continued Targeting Pod Spiral Development, High Definition in Cockpit Display and

Broadband Uplink 77

F-16 Secure Line-of-Sight and Beyond Line-of-Sight with Three Dimensional Audio Communications 78

F-16 Day / Night Compatible Helmet Mounted Integrated Targeting 79

F-16 APG-68 Radar Enhancements 80

TAB I - HH-60 Pave Hawk Overview 81

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 82

HH-60 Advanced Electronic Warfare Penetrator Suite 83

HH-60 Modernized Defensive System Suite 84

HH-60 Integrated Flight Deck 85

HH-60 Helmet Mounted Cueing Situational Awareness 86

HH-60 Crew Served Aircraft Weapons Modernization 87

TAB J - KC-135 Stratotanker Overview 89

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 90

KC-135 Block 30 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures 91

KC-135 Secure Line-of-Sight / Beyond Line-of-Sight Data Link and Situational Awareness Cockpit

Display Units 92

KC-135 External Overt / Covert Lighting 93

KC-135 Fuel Tank Fire Explosion Protection 94

KC-135 Aircraft Ground Cooling Capability 95

Tab K - Logistics Overview 97

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 98

Logistics Aircraft Test Equipment 99

Logistics Aircraft Support Equipment 100

Logistics Advanced Repair Capability 101

Logistics Maintenance Support Vehicles 102

Logistics Maintenance Stands and Platforms 103
iii

Winning the Battle - Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

TAB L - Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Systems Overview 105

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 106

RC-26B Block 25 Reconfiguration 107

RC-26B Block 20 to 25 Common Configuration 108

RC-26B Avionics Modernization 109

RC-26B Interoperable Beyond Line-of-Sight Communications Data Link 110

RC-26B Second Full Motion Video Sensor Including Laser Designator 111

Distributed Common Ground System Fully Integrated Processing, Exploitation and Dissemination

Suite 112

Distributed Common Ground System Units Unclassified Processing, Analysis and Dissemination

System and Network Architecture 113

TAB M - Operational Support Aircraft (OSA) Overview 115

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 116

C-38A Replacement Aircraft 117

C-40C Avionics Modernization 118

C-40C Land-Based High Speed Data 119

C-40C Procurement 120

C-40C Cabin Refurbishment 121

TAB N - Guardian Angel, Special Tactics, and Tactical Air Control Party Overview 123

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 124

Guardian Angel Human Performance Optimization 125

Guardian Angel Combat Survivability Suite 126

Guardian Angel Weapons Modernization Suite 127

Guardian Angel Storage Solutions Suite 128

Special Tactics Employment Enhancement Suite 129

Special Tactics Dismounted Operator Suite 130

Special Tactics Environmental Assessment Suite 131

Special Tactics Communications Enhancement Suite 132

Special Tactics Home Station Training Suite 133

Tactical Air Control Party Rapidly Deployable Joint Operational Communications System 134

Tactical Air Control Party Lightweight Dismounted Sensor and Targeting System 135

Tactical Air Control Party Software Targeting and Data Management System 136

Tactical Air Control Party Air Support Operations Center Tactical Data Link Control Terminal Suite 137

TAB O - MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper Overview 139

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 140

MQ-1/MQ-9 Integrated Communications Suite 141

MQ-1/MQ-9 High Speed Exploitation Support Data 142

MQ-1/MQ-9 Rapid, Robust Data Transfer and Sharing 143

MQ-1/MQ-9 Virtual Collaboration Mission Execution Framework 144

TAB P - Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation Overview 145

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 146

Simulation Air National Guard Advanced Joint Terminal Attack Controller Training System 147

Simulation Battle Control Center Multi-Level Security Distributed Mission

Operations Training Center 148

Simulation Control and Reporting Center Deployable Mission Simulation Training Support Systems 149

Simulation EC-130J Simulator Training Devices 150

Simulation MQ-1/MQ-9 Distributed Mission Operations Capable Simulator Connectivity to the

Distributed Training Operations Center 151

Simulation Air and Space Operations Center Joint Range Extension with Joint Distributed Operational

Training System 152

Simulation Guardian Angel Full Spectrum Capabilities 153

Simulation Distributed Common Ground System with Fully Integrated Suite of Distributed

Training Operations Center Equipment, Software and Connectivity 154

Ranges High-Fidelity Surrogate Targets 155
iv

Winning the Battle - Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Ranges Mobile High-Fidelity Threat Simulators 156

Ranges Communications and Tactical Data Link Architecture Support 157

Ranges Joint Advanced Weapon Scoring System 158

Ranges “Rangeless” Air Combat Maneuvering Instrumentation 159

TAB Q – Space Operations, Cyber and Information Operations Overview 161

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 162

Space Operations Counter Communications system 163

Cyber Warfare and Information Operations Garrison Interceptor Platform 164

Cyber Warfare and Information Operations Virtual Interconnected Training Environment 165

Cyber Warfare and Information Operations Secure Infrastructure Collaborative Capability 166

Cyber Warfare and Information Operations Remote Access Toolset 167

TAB R - Security Forces Overview 169

2013 Weapons and Tactics Capabilities List 170

Security Forces Professional Bag Expansion and Modernization 171

Security Forces Active Shooter Response Suite 172

Security Forces Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Night Observation Equipment 173

Security Forces Close Combat Mission Capability Kits 174

Security Forces Small Arms Range Solutions 175
v

Winning the Battle - Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

INTRODUCTION

The 2014 Air National Guard (ANG) Weapons Systems Modernization Priorities Book 

documents capability priorities identified during the Dec 2013 Air Reserve Component Weapons 

and Tactics (WEPTAC) Conference. WEPTAC included representatives from all ANG and Air 

Force Reserve (AFR) units, as well as representation from the active component. The 2014 book 

is organized into 18 individual weapons systems Tabs. Each Tab begins with a summary page of 

capabilities identified at WEPTAC, categorized as Critical (crucial within the next 1 to 3 years), 

Essential (vital within the next 3 to 5 years), or Desired (enhances mission success in the 5-year 

timeframe). 

For each Critical capability identified, an information paper is included within the weapon 

system Tab. A header within each information paper identifies its appropriate Service Core 

Function or functional category as one of the following:

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack Rapid Global Mobility

Space Superiority / Cyberspace Superiority Command and Control

Agile Combat Support Special Operations / Personnel Recovery 

Global Integrated Intelligence, Reconnaissance Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations

and Surveillance and Range Instrumentation

Applicable Funding Appropriation Definitions

3840 - ANG Operations and Maintenance, 1-year funding

3010 - Aircraft Procurement, 3-year funding

3600 - Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, 2-year funding

3080 - Other Procurement, 3-year funding

In most cases, Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE) costs are paid for with 3600 Research, 

Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) money, but in some cases they can be funded with 

procurement money.

The State Matrix page identifies ANG weapons systems locations by state and territory. 

These depictions reflect the force structure as of 1 Jan 2014, and are subject to change based on 

force structure changes that have not been released.
vi

Winning the Battle - Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

State State Matrix Matrix

Weapons Systems Reference Table by State (1 Jan 2014)

Refer to Weapon System Tabs for Specific Information (Classic Associate Units are shown in red.)

A-10

B-2

C-17

C-130

E-8/C-32

F-15F-16F-22

HH-60

KC-135

MQ-1 MQ-9

OSA

AOC/ACS 

CRC/ADS

Space / 

Cyber / IO

RC-26 DCGS 

GA / ST / 

TACP

Ranges

AK      Space GA

AL   

AR   MQ-9  

AZ   MQ-1  

CA     MQ-1/9 CY/SP  GA

CO   Space 

CT  

DC  

DE  Cyber

FL   Space 

GA  E-8   TACP 

GU

HI     

IA   MQ-9 

ID   TACP

IL    TACP

IN    TACP 

KS   CY/SP  TACP 

KY  ST

LA   TACP

MA   

MD  Cyber

ME 

MI   MQ-9  

MN  

MO    

MS     TACP 

MT  

NC  TACP

ND MQ-1

NE 

NH 

NJ C-32    TACP 

NM   

NV  MQ-1/9 

NY    MQ-9  Space  GA/TP 

OH    MQ-1 

OK    TACP

OR   ST

PA   MQ-9  TACP 

PR  

RI  Cyber

SC 

SD 

TN   MQ-9

TX   MQ-1 Cyber  TACP 

UT   

VA  

VI

VT  Cyber

WA   CY (2)  TACP

WI     

WV   

WY  Space
vii

Winning the Battle - Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

2014 Weapons Systems Modernization Priorities Book Credits:

Project Officer: Lt Col Jeff Menges, NGB/A5P

Editors: Mr. Ronald Kornreich, NGB/A5P and Lt Col Tiffany Pasanen, NGB/A5D

SharePoint Coordinators: Lt Col Kenny Cushing, NGB/A5P and Ms. Nicole Savoy, NGB/A5E

An online version of this document is available at: http://www.nationalguard.mil/ll/docs/2013wsmp.pdf

Contacts

Col Sherrie L. McCandless NGB/A5

Director, Plans & Requirements

240-612-9366 (DSN 612-9366)

Email: sherrie.mccandless@ang.af.mil

Col Dean A. Tremps NGB/A3

Director, Operations

240-612-9454 (DSN 612-9454)

Email: dean.tremps@ang.af.mil

Mr. Frank F. Ballinger NGB/A5

Associate Director, Plans & 

Requirements

240-612-9351 (DSN 612-9351)

Email: frank.ballinger@ang.af.mil

Col Jeffrey Bozard NGB/A4

Director, Logistics

240-612-8470 (DSN 612-8470)

Email: jeffrey.bozard@ang.af.mil

Col Kevin Campbell NGB/A5R

Chief, Operational Requirements

240-612-9363 (DSN 612-9363)

Email: kevin.campbell.2@ang.af.mil

Col Kevin Donovan NGB/A6

Director, Communications

240-612-8602 (DSN 612-8602)

Email: kevin.donovan@ang.af.mil

Lt Col Jeffrey Menges NGB/A5P

Chief, Requirements Integration

240-612-9367 (DSN 612-9367)

Email: jeffrey.menges@ang.af.mil

Col Peter Sartori NGB/A7

Director, Installation & Mission Support 

240-612-8060 (DSN 612-8060)

Email: peter.sartori@ang.af.mil

Mr. Michael Regan NGB/A5D

Chief, Domestic Requirements

240-612-9356 (DSN 612-9356)

Email: michael.regan.1@ang.af.mil

Col Bradley Swanson NGB/A8/9

Director, Plans & Programs

240-612-9382 (DSN 612-9382)

Email: bradley.swanson@ang.af.mil

Col Michael E. Flanagan NGB/A1

Director, Manpower, Personnel & 

Services

240-612-9455 (DSN 612-9455)

Email: michael.flanagan@ang.af.mil

Col Mathew Manifold AATC/CC

Commander

520-295-6900 (DSN 844-6900)

Email: mathew.manifold@.ang.af.mil

Col Jessica Meyeraan NGB/A2

Director, Intelligence, Surveillance and 

Reconnaissance

240-612-9307 (DSN 612-9307)

Email: jessica.meyerann@ang.af.mil
viii

Winning the Battle - Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
1

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

A-10

The A-10 continues to prove itself as the premier close air 

support platform of choice for overseas contingency 

operations. It operates from austere airfields, provides 

flexibility beyond that of any other fixed wing Air Force asset, 

and remains extremely viable for future conflicts. With a near 

continuous presence since 2002 in Operations ENDURING 

FREEDOM and IRAQI FREEDOM, the A-10 has proven its 

ability to minimize collateral damage with precision munitions 

and its 30 mm cannon. The significant weapons load out, 

coupled with its extensive loiter time and survivability at low 

altitudes, provides a capability that is unmatched by any current Air Force weapon system, while 

also giving ground forces in close proximity to enemy forces excellent support in almost any 

weather condition.

Air National Guard (ANG) A-10s have deployed multiple times over the last few years, and all 

were equipped with the AN/AAR-47 missile warning system and dual secure line-of-sight 

ARC-210 satellite communications radio. The next ANG A-10s to deploy will carry the 

Lightweight Airborne Recovery System to aid in Combat Search and Rescue, and the Scorpion 

Helmet Mounted Integrated Targeting system, which reduces the time to acquire targets with 

aircraft sensors from minutes to seconds. 

While the A-10 excels at contingency operations, ongoing A-10 modernization programs will 

ensure the aircraft remains viable in any conflict. The first of these programs is an anti-jam 

embedded Global Positioning System (GPS), which will provide the ability to operate and 

employ in a degraded, denied or deceived GPS environment. Additionally, a three-dimensional

audio cockpit system will provide spatial 

separation of radios and threat warnings, so a 

pilot can immediately determine threat 

location. Finally, the high resolution center 

display allows pilots to see the high definition 

picture provided by current targeting pods. 

Such a display allows a significant 

improvement in positive identification of 

friendly and enemy combatants, while aiding in 

the search, surveillance and tracking of enemy 

personnel.

 Close Air Support

 Forward Air Controller – Airborne

 Combat Search and Rescue

 ANG A-10 Units Provide 30% of the Total Fleet

A-10 TAB A
2

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

A-10

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

 Improved Positive Identification

 Operational Flight Program

 Integrated Communications Suite

 Improved Ability to Operate in a Contested and Degraded Operations Environment

 Improved Capability to Employ from Austere Airfields

Essential Capabilities List

 Propulsion and Airframe Enhancement

 Improved Electronic Attack and Electronic Protection 

 Synthetic Aperture Radar Pod

 Smart Triple Ejector Rack

 Full AIM-9 Integration

Desired Capabilities List

 Instrument Flight Rules-Certified Heads-Up Display 

 Laser Threat Protection for Eyes and Sensors

 Electronic Flight Bag with Cockpit Power Source

 High Capacity Removable Mass Memory Device 

 Longer Range Precision Guided Munition 
3

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

A-10 IMPROVED POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION

1. Background. Positive Identification (PID) of friendly forces and enemy combatants is 

crucial in any conflict. Every action must be taken to eliminate fratricide and civilian casualties. 

Currently, three capabilities can immediately help A-10 pilots minimize misidentification. The 

first of these is the Helmet Mounted Integrated Targeting (HMIT) system. HMIT will reduce the 

time to acquire targets with aircraft sensors from minutes to seconds and allow pilots to quickly 

locate the position of friendly forces on the ground. By simply looking outside the cockpit using 

HMIT, the pilot can immediately determine a three-dimensional picture of the battlefield while 

assessing risk to friendly forces and civilian personnel and property. The next key in finding and 

identifying hostile forces is the ability to see the “best ground detail available.” Advanced 

Targeting Pod (ATP)-Sensor Enhancement (SE) technology can provide the scene clarity 

necessary for a pilot to find enemies previously undetectable from the air, while displaying the 

detail necessary to determine, for example, if an individual is carrying a weapon or a tool. This 

technology comes in the form of sensor enhancement systems that will make legacy targeting 

pods obsolete. Targeting pod upgrades include better connectivity and processing, as well as a 

digital port to send high resolution digital imagery to the cockpit. In order to maximize the 

effectiveness of the upgraded ATPs, A-10s require a third capability, high resolution displays, to 

be able to fully utilize the targeting pod image quality, improve available processing power, and 

replace aging flight instruments. 

2. Source of Need. Combatant Command Urgent Operational Need (UON), 26 Sep 2008; 

2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

4. Program Details. PEC: 27131F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

38 ATP-SE Pods (3010) $1,900,000 $72,200,000

85 Color Displays (3010) $376,000 $31,960,000

218 Digital Port Upgrades (3010) $250,000 $54,500,000

1 Display NRE (3600) $6,500,000 $6,500,000

128 HMIT Improvements (3010) $31,250 $4,000,000

Total $169,160,000

* Includes 10% spares.

122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN 127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 188 RW Ft Smith RAP, AR

124 FW Boise AP, ID 175 WG Martin State AP, MD
4

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

A-10 OPERATIONAL FLIGHT PROGRAM

1. Background. The A-10 requires continued updates to the Operational Flight Program (OFP)

software. The A-10 OFP is the key to integrating and updating all systems and weapons carried 

on the aircraft. The current A-10 OFP software development cycle is 3 years, during which 

software candidates are prioritized and incorporated into the OFP based prioritization. When an 

OFP is not funded in a stable budget, candidate modifications are removed from development, 

significantly limiting the sustainment of aging systems, and preventing full integration of both 

new aircraft and weapon capabilities. The next A-10 OFP, Suite 8, is underfunded for both 

software development and System Integration Laboratory (SIL) development. If the A-10 

remains in service for an extended period of time, follow-on OFP updates will be required and 

will have a significant impact on future A-10 capabilities. Sustainment items will also be vital to 

keep the aircraft flying. The A-10 must carry updated, more capable weapons, including an upto-date targeting pod, which is crucial in executing the primary missions of Close Air Support 

(CAS), Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR), and support to Joint Terminal Air Controllers 

(JTAC). The A-10 requires integration of new systems like the high resolution display or the 

jam-resistant Global Positioning System (GPS), both of which will provide tremendous 

capabilities to the aircraft and Combatant Commanders in future conflict.

2. Source of Need. A-10 Operational Requirements Document (ORD), 19 Oct 1999; 2012-

2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN 127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 188 RW Ft Smith RAP, AR

124 FW Boise AP, ID 175 WG Martin State AP, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 27131F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

3 OFP Software Upgrades (3600) $36,000,000 $108,000,000

1 Complete Suite 8 Funding (3600) $9,400,000 $9,400,000

Total $117,400,000
5

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

A-10 INTEGRATED COMMUNICATIONS SUITE

1. Background. The A-10 communications suite improvements consist of the ARC-210 radio, 

three-dimensional (3-D) audio, and Warrior Situational Awareness (SA). Two ARC-210 multiband and multi-mode digital radios that include Satellite Communications to meet the urgent 

operational need for simultaneous beyond line-of-sight and secure line-of-sight communications 

have been fielded on all Air National Guard A-10s. Integration of Warrior SA in the ARC-210 

radio will allow ground troops’ Global Positioning System data, transmitted by the existing 

radios of thousands of ground troops, to be displayed on the A-10 Tactical Awareness Display, 

the targeting pod field of view, as well as within the Helmet Mounted Integrated Targeting 

(HMIT) system display. This capability will allow the pilot to simply look outside the cockpit 

and immediately see the position of friendly ground troops on a mountain side or within a village 

that would normally take several minutes to identify. This reduces the risk of fratricide and 

lowers the pilot workload in a Close Air Support (CAS) or Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) 

scenario. The integration of noise-cancelling and 3-D audio increases situational awareness by 

spatially separating aural warnings and radio information, and providing angular cueing to 

ground and air threats when used in conjunction with the HMIT system. This spatial separation 

and reduction in ambient noise significantly increases the pilot’s ability to process information 

coming from up to four radios and warning systems simultaneously.

2. Source of Need. 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN 127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 188 RW Ft Smith RAP, AR

124 FW Boise AP, ID 175 WG Martin State AP, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 27131F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

1 Directional Audio NRE (3600) $3,000,000 $3,000,000

128 Directional Audio Pilot Equipment (3010) $7,000 $896,000

85 Directional Kits (3010) $94,000 $7,990,000

1 Warrior SA (3010) $2,000,000 $2,000,000

8 3-D Audio Unit Test Equipment (3080) $43,800 $350,400

Total $14,236,400

* Includes 10% spares.
6

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

A-10 IMPROVED ABILITY TO OPERATE IN A CONTESTED AND DEGRADED 

OPERATIONS ENVIRONMENT

1. Background. The A-10 uses an Embedded Global Positioning System (GPS) / Inertial 

Navigation System (INS) (EGI) for precision navigation and weapons employment. The EGI is 

the heart of the A-10 avionics system. To counter jamming threats, the A-10 requires a 

Controlled Reception Pattern Antenna (CRPA) that significantly nullifies the effects of jamming 

systems based on the aircraft distance from that system. In addition to the new antenna, the A-10 

also requires a hardware update to the current EGI system. This includes Selective Availability 

Anti-Spoofing Modules (SAASM), which combat these hostile jamming influences to protect 

Precise Positioning Systems and Standard Positioning Systems. Additionally, a current Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) ruling mandates a SAASM-based Automatic Dependent 

Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) EGI by 2020 for all aircraft to support its transition to satellitebased air traffic control systems, capable of providing better surveillance precision and 

reliability. Upgrading the A-10’s current EGI system will support this FAA requirement, while 

providing increased capability to keep the positional information accurate in a Contested and 

Degraded Operations (CDO) environment. The accurate positional information on the data link, 

provided by EGI, is critical to determine the location of friendly ground forces, and minimize the 

risk of fratricide, as well as civilian collateral damage when employing ordnance in any combat 

environment.

2. Source of Need. FAA Rule - 14 CFR Part 91 [Docket No. FAA-2007-29305; Amdt. No. 91-

314], RIN 2120-AI92 - ADS-B Out Performance Requirements to Support Air Traffic Control 

Services, 28 May 2010; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN 127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 188 RW Ft Smith RAP, AR

124 FW Boise AP, ID 175 WG Martin State AP, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 27131F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

85 Anti-Jam EGI (3010) $155,000 $13,175,000

1 Anti-Jam EGI NRE (3600) $2,100,000 $2,100,000

Total $15,275,000

* Includes 10% spares.
7

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

A-10 IMPROVED CAPABILITY TO EMPLOY FROM AUSTERE AIRFIELDS

1. Background. The A-10 is the only fighter aircraft in the Air Force inventory that has the 

ability to land at austere, unimproved airfields to include dry lake beds. This capability gives 

Combatant Commanders a tremendous amount of flexibility to pre-deploy A-10s closer to the 

expected battlespace, and allows them a quicker response time for the three primary missions of 

Close Air Support (CAS), Forward Air Controller-Airborne (FAC-A), and Combat Search and 

Rescue (CSAR). Emerging capabilities will further improve the A-10’s ability to effectively 

operate out of austere airfields, while reducing maintenance and logistics personnel and 

equipment required to support such operations. The first of these new capabilities is a covert /

overt landing light that will give pilots the option to select a night vision-compatible landing 

light. Second, a combat-capable external fuel tank will provide additional flight time and limit 

the requirement to put a tanker aircraft in harm’s way for extended missions in enemy territory. 

Third, to limit the support equipment footprint, an On-Board Oxygen Generating System 

(OBOGS) removes the requirement for maintenance personnel to refill the current liquid oxygen 

system between missions. Fourth, a parking brake allows pilots to sit in the aircraft waiting for 

launch instructions without additional personnel to place and remove wheel chocks. Finally, the 

Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) allows the A-10 to carry at least 

35 precision guided rockets. These weapons have many positive characteristics in that they are 

easily hand-loaded into a rocket pod already mounted on the aircraft minimizing the munitions 

personnel required at austere airfields. The APKWS weapons are lightweight, very precise, have 

significant destructive capabilities, and minimize collateral damage.

2. Source of Need. A-10 Operational Requirements Document (ORD), 19 Oct 1999; 2012-

2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

122 FW Ft Wayne IAP, IN 127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 188 RW Ft Smith RAP, AR

124 FW Boise AP, ID 175 WG Martin State AP, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 27131F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

63 Combat Fuel Tanks (3010) $80,000 $5,040,000

43 Covert / Overt Landing Lights (3010) $27,500 $1,182,500

85 OBOGS (3010) $208,000 $17,680,000

43 Parking Brakes (3010) $25,000 $1,075,000

126 Advanced Precision Kill Weapon Systems

(3020) $83,000 $10,458,000

Total $35,435,500

* Includes 10% spares.
8

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
9

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air National Guard (ANG) Command and Control 

(C2) weapons systems are integral to the joint fight in 

Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), and 

transforming the rapidly expanding Homeland Defense 

(HD) mission area.

Air and Space Operations Center (AOC) - The 

Component-Numbered Air Force (C-NAF) is 

comprised of an AOC and Air Force Forces (AFFOR) 

Staff. The AOC weapon system is the capstone of the 

Theater Air Control System (TACS) employed by the 

Commander, Air Force Forces (COMAFFOR) providing centralized control and decentralized 

execution of aerospace forces to the Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC). The AStaff is organized functionally, with a command section, personal staff and functional staff A1 

through A9, as well as a variety of cross-functional teams that support the COMAFFOR as the 

AF service component commander.

Control and Reporting Center (CRC) / Air Control Squadron (ACS) - An ACS is the only 

Air Force 24/7 deployable and sustainable ground Battle Management Command and Control 

(BMC2) platform. The CRC provides operational and tactical surveillance, weapons control, 

communications, data links and combat-related air battle management of joint air operations with 

real-time Shared Situational Awareness (SSA). 

Air Defense Sector (ADS) - An ADS 

provides tactical communication and data link

capabilities to bridge communications 

between civil authorities and other military 

units responsible for planning, directing, 

coordinating and controlling forces for air 

surveillance, air defense and control of 

sovereign US airspace.

Command & Control TAB 

B

Command & 

Control

 Air Defense and Surveillance for North America

 Air Battle Management 

 C-NAF Integration / Augmentation

 Military Range Control 

 Centralized Control 

 Ground Controlled Intercept 

 Flight Safety Monitoring
10

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

Air and Space Operations Center:

 Recurring Event 11 Upgrade

 Direct Operational Secure Voice 

Communication

 Trusted Thin Client - Single Pane of 

Glass

 Mission Network Access

Control and Reporting Center:

 Modular Tactical Electrical Power 

Mission Support Systems

 Integrated Digital Mission Recording

 Remote Voice Communications

Air Defense Sector:

 Battle Control Center Beyond Line-ofSight Tactical Satellite Communications

 Battle Control Center Line-of-Sight 

Communications

Essential Capabilities List

Air and Space Operations Center:

 Air and Space Operations Center

Communications Training Tool

 Targeting Application Weapon System

 Cross-Domain Solution for Information 

Exchange

 Air Reserve Component Network

 Multiple Source Correlator Tracker 

Control and Reporting Center:

 Organic Networking and 

Communications Equipment

 Upgrade Command and Control Engine 

to Meet Current and Future Operations

Air Defense Sector:

 Nationwide Integrated Data Link 

Architecture

 Battle Control Center Mission System 

Migration to Battlespace Command and 

Control Center Software and Multiple 

Source Correlator Tracker

 Next Generation Operator Environment 

Using Networked Architecture Capable 

of Information Sharing and Full Sensor 

Integration

 Sensor Enhancements to Find, Fix, 

Target and Track Low-Altitude/LowRadar Cross Section Non-Cooperative 

Targets

Desired Capabilities List

Air and Space Operations Center:

 None

Control and Reporting Center:

 None

Air Defense Sector:

 None
11

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER RECURRING EVENT 11 UPGRADE

1. Background. The Air and Space Operations Center (AOC) Weapon System Recurring Event 

(RE) 11 represents significant progress over previous Theater Battle Management Core Systems

(TBMCS) and is the mission system core of the AOC weapon system baseline (RE 12 and

13 will follow-on as planned upgrades). RE 11 contains a major system platform change, as well 

as an equipment upgrade. It provides improved internal AOC network capability, server

virtualization, security updates and corrects vulnerabilities identified in the underlying 

applications and subsystems. RE 11 is programmed for installation within all active duty AOCs. 

However, only one Air Reserve Component (ARC)-aligned Air Operations Group (AOG) is 

currently funded for this upgrade. ARC AOG programmed upgrades are scheduled at a 

12+ month delay from their active duty-aligned counterpart. The AOC weapon system baseline 

funding shortfall creates an operational mismatch between active duty- and ARC-aligned units, 

affecting training and mission relevance. The lack of a common AOC weapons system 

configuration results in significant training and operational divergences between the ARC AOGs 

and their active duty-aligned AOCs, specifically the Combat Operations Division (COD) and 

Combat Plans Division (CPD).

2. Source of Need. Program Action Directive (PAD) 10-2; Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 

Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 3505.01A; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Requirement.

3. Units Impacted.

102 IW Otis ANGB, MA 112 AOS State College, PA 217 AOG Battle Creek IAP, MI

4. Program Details. PEC: 507411F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

3 RE 11 (3080) $2,000,000 $6,000,000

Total $6,000,000
12

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER DIRECT OPERATIONAL SECURE VOICE 

COMMUNICATION

1. Background. Air and Space Operations Centers (AOC) continue to use Radio Frequency 

(RF) as a means to communicate with joint services, allies, partner nations, aircraft platforms and 

associate units. To support their aligned AOCs, Air National Guard (ANG) units require the 

Core Radio Package System (CRPS) or AccessNet to properly train and equip both operators and 

maintainers. An additional benefit is an enhanced state of readiness providing real-time training 

between multiple in-state units. AOC units must train on the same systems as the AOCs they 

support. Also, the radio-to-Internet Protocol (IP) bridge, such as AccessNet, can be used by 

ANG AOCs to simulate and train realistic Tactical Air Control System (TACS) control 

procedures; participate in real-world events; conduct distributed operations; interface with 

aligned units; and increase readiness training. A CRPS should consist of at least two PRC-117G 

model radio stations to include batteries; handset and speaker; Communications Security 

(COMSEC) equipment; and associated high-gain antenna and low loss cables. Moreover, a 

radio-IP bridge provides digital voice communications that route live radio voice traffic between 

multiple sites over local and wide area data networks for additional capabilities.

2. Source of Need. Program Action Directive (PAD) 10-2; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

102 AOG Otis ANGB, MA 157 AOG Jefferson Barracks, MO 701 COS March ARB, CA

112 AOS State College, PA 183 AOG Springfield, IL 710 COS Langley AFB, VA

152 AOG Syracuse, NY 217 AOG Battle Creek, MI

4. Program Details. PEC: 507411F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

8 Secure Voice Communications Suites (3080) $100,000 $800,000

Total $800,000
13

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER TRUSTED THIN CLIENT - SINGLE PANE 

OF GLASS

1. Background. Air and Space Operations Center (AOC) operators and Air Force Forces 

(AFFOR) Command contingency planners require daily use of multiple domain networks to 

conduct distributed operations and training. Information across multiple domains needs to be 

visible simultaneously to provide effective training and operational support to their respective 

Component-Numbered Air Force (C-NAF), as well as to their State Joint Force Headquarters 

Joint Operations Centers (JFHQ JOC) to conduct Domestic Operations (DOMOPS). A crossdomain solution via a Trusted Thin Client facilitates multiple views of different networks 

operating at various classification levels within the Air Operations Group (external to the 

Falconer Weapons System). The Cross-Domain / Trusted Thin Client provides simultaneous 

views of Non-Secure Internet Protocol Router (NIPR), Secure Internet Protocol Router (SIPR), 

Command and Control Air National Guard (C2ANG), Secret, Top Secret and/or coalition 

networks. The system must include Top Secret and Below Interoperability (TSABI) and Secret 

and Below Interoperability (SABI). The system also must include Global Network Enterprise 

Construct concepts for information sharing, decreasing network / user footprint and providing 

multiple domain access to the warfighter. 

2. Source of Need. 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability. 

3. Units Impacted.

101 AOG Tyndall AFB, FL 112 AOG State College, PA 183 AOG Springfield, IL

102 AOG Otis ANGB, MA 152 AOG Syracuse, NY 217 AOG Battle Creek, MI

109 AOG JBPHH, HI 157 AOG Jefferson Barracks, MO 286 AOG Meridian, MS

111 AOG Horsham, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 507411F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

10 Cross Domain Network Solutions (3080) $450,000 $4,500,000

Total $4,500,000
14

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER MISSION NETWORK ACCESS 

1. Background. The network access required to successfully support the Air National Guard 

(ANG) Component-Numbered Air Force (C-NAF) enterprise mission is significant and growing. 

The level and quality of network bandwidth must support the Falconer Air Operations Center 

Program of Record, Domestic Operations, Distributed Operations, and training with aligned 

Regular Air Force units, Continuity of Operations Planning, and remote and localized exercises. 

Additionally, the growth of cyber and Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR)

training demands across the Air and Space Operations Center (AOC) continue to strain the 

infrastructure of ANG C-NAF units. An increase in size and throughput from the current 

T1 (1.5 MB) Secret Internet Protocol Router (SIPR) line, and increased bandwidth on distributed 

training networks (e.g., Joint Training and Experimentation Network, Air Reserve Component 

Network, Distributed Mission Operations Network) are required to accommodate growth. 

Redundant circuits will be required for units providing Distributed Operations, as well as a direct 

connection to aligned Regular Air Force units. A suggested baseline of a redundant, 

synchronous DS3 (45 MB) on SIPR is recommended, but specific bandwidth requirements for 

each site must be determined and documented. 

2. Source of Need. Program Action Directive (PAD) 10-2; 2011-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

101 AOG Tyndall AFB, FL 112 AOG State College, PA 183 AOG Springfield, IL

102 AOG Otis ANGB, MA 152 AOG Syracuse, NY 217 AOG Battle Creek, MI

109 AOG JBPHH, HI 157 AOG Jefferson Barracks, MO 286 AOG Meridian, MS

111 AOG Horsham, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 507411F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

11 Network Bandwidth Access 1(3080) $50,000 $550,000

11 Network Bandwidth Access 2(3080) $20,000 $220,000

Total $770,000
15

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER MODULAR TACTICAL ELECTRICAL 

POWER MISSION SUPPORT SYSTEMS

1. Background. The Control and Reporting Center (CRC) is a mobile Battle Management 

Command and Control (BMC2) capability with the deployable radar elements of the Theater Air 

Control System (TACS). The CRC integrates a comprehensive air picture via multiple data links 

from air-, sea-, and land-based sensors, as well as from its embedded surveillance and control 

radars. It performs decentralized Command and Control (C2) of joint operations by conducting 

threat warning, battle management, theater missile defense, weapons control, combat 

identification and strategic communications. For continuous operations the CRC requires safe 

and reliable power to operate in a deployed environment. An integrated power grid consists of 

the Power Distribution Panel Systems (PDPS), all weather tactical power cables and state-of-theart tactical generators that enable consolidation and reduction of numerous legacy electrical 

power production units and support systems. The primary power grid interconnected with PDPS 

must be capable of load balancing. Although the primary components of the PDPS equipment 

have been delivered to all units, interconnect cables and components are still required for all 

units to have a fully functional, safe and efficient power distribution system; and enable the 

ability to rapidly deploy and connect power to mission essential equipment.

2. Source of Need. 2010-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

103 ACS Orange, CT 123 ACS Blue Ash, OH 134 ACS McConnell AFB, KS

109 ACS Salt Lake City, UT 128 ACS Volk Field, WI 141 ACS Punta Borinquen, PR

116 ACS Warrenton, OR 133 TS Fort Dodge, IA 255 ACS Gulfport, MS

117 ACS Savannah, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 52672F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

10 Power Distribution Systems (3080) $195,000 $1,950,000

Total $1,950,000
16

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER INTEGRATED DIGITAL MISSION 

RECORDING 

1. Background. The Control and Reporting Center (CRC) is a mobile Battle Management 

Command and Control (BMC2) capability with the deployable radar elements of the Theater Air 

Control System (TACS). The CRC integrates a comprehensive air picture via multiple data links 

from air-, sea-, and land-based sensors, as well as from its embedded surveillance and control 

radars. The Operations Module (OM) has a very limited communications recording capability 

based on an outdated reel-to-reel system. The current system only records audio inputs from the 

four operator positions in the OM. The playback feature is difficult to use and can only be 

accessed in the OM. The CRC currently has no way to capture a video feed fused with audio for 

mission review, significantly degrading the debrief and mission reconstruction capability 

required for safety and training. The CRC also lacks the ability to display any mission related 

activity outside of the OM. The CRC requires a stand-alone appliance for recording and/or 

streaming video display combined with operator audio inputs into a single source. The system 

must be able to capture the Video Graphics Array (VGA)-based high definition display operators 

use while working a duty position. The appliance must combine the audio from an adapter 

placed in line with the user’s headset. The recorder will combine these inputs into a 

synchronized time-stamped data stream. The recorded content can then be replayed and stored 

as a safety item for mission playback. To comply with information security the video recording 

appliance must be modular to enable secure storage when the OMs are not operational. This 

modular design will allow use in future BMC2 platforms within the CRC.

2. Source of Need. Operations Module System Life Extension Program (OM SLEP) Functional 

Capabilities Document (FCD); AN-TYQ-23 Modification FCD; AF Form 1067 Air Combat 

Command (ACC) 09-074; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

103 ACS Orange, CT 123 ACS Blue Ash, OH 134 ACS McConnell AFB, KS

109 ACS Salt Lake City, UT 128 ACS Volk Field, WI 141 ACS Punta Borinquen, PR

116 ACS Warrenton, OR 133 TS Fort Dodge, IA 255 ACS Gulfport, MS

117 ACS Savannah, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 52672F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

80 Recorder / Audio Adapters (3080) $3,000 $240,000

20 Stand Alone Laptops (3080) $900 $18,000

Total $258,000
17

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER REMOTE VOICE COMMUNICATIONS

1. Background. Air Combat Command (ACC) has tasked the Air National Guard (ANG) to 

provide 10 Air Control Squadrons (ACS) to execute mission functions and capabilities of a 

deployable Control and Reporting Center (CRC) in support of air operations. The CRC is a 

mobile Battle Management Command and Control (BMC2) capability with the deployable radar 

elements of the Theater Air Control System (TACS). CRC operators have a critical training 

requirement to conduct specialized live missions to obtain proficiency and remain combat 

mission ready. The upcoming availability of Non-Organic Radar Access (NORA) from the 

System Program Office, along with an ability to utilize remote radar and radio data within each 

CRC will not only satisfy this requirement, but also prove invaluable in training, mission 

operations and overall combat readiness. The long haul communications package capability will 

mitigate a current training deficiency within the mission set, provide first of its kind capability to 

control various types of live fly missions locally from each respective unit, and significantly 

reduce the cost of sending personnel to different locations to obtain specialized training. The 

ACC community requires an accredited and approved technical capability providing software 

and hardware components enabling all CRCs remote radar and radio access over an Internet 

Protocol (IP)-based network. The remote voice capability enables full use of the NORA system. 

2. Source of Need. North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) Contingency 

Plan (CONPLAN) 3310-12; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

103 ACS Orange, CT 123 ACS Blue Ash, OH 134 ACS McConnell AFB, KS

109 ACS Salt Lake City, UT 128 ACS Volk Field, WI 141 ACS Punta Borinquen, PR

116 ACS Warrenton, OR 133 TS Fort Dodge, IA 255 ACS Gulfport, MS

117 ACS Savannah, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 52672F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

10 Communications Suites (3840) $200,000 $2,000,000

Total $2,000,000
18

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

AIR DEFENSE SECTOR BATTLE CONTROL CENTER BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT 

TACTICAL SATELITE COMMUNICATIONS

1. Background. Battle Control Centers (BCC) require a baseline capability to use beyond lineof-sight (BLOS) Tactical Satellite Communications (TACSAT) to achieve 100 percent radio and 

data coverage in the US and its territories. TACSAT must be voice and data capable and have 

the ability to support connectivity in the extreme northern latitudes (North of 66 00°). Radios 

must be located at the BCC to allow direct control of the waveform by the BCC operators. 

While the primary method of communication in Homeland Defense (HD) will continue to be via 

line-of-sight (LOS), the vast expanse of the area of operations means there are significant LOS 

gaps. Because of these gaps, the BCCs require communications via satellite, enabling 

100 percent communication connectivity for HD. Employment of TACSAT at the BCC will 

positively affect voice and data connectivity in all North American Aerospace Defense 

Command-Northern Command (NORAD-NORTHCOM) mission sets to include HD, Defense 

Support to Civil Authorities (DSCA) and Aerospace Control Alert (ACA).

2. Source of Need. Battle Control Center Enabling Concept; 2008-2013 ARC WEPTAC 

Critical Capability. 

3. Units Impacted. 

169 ACWS Wheeler AAF, HI 176 ADS Elmendorf AFB, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 51311F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

16 Communications Suites (3080) $37,000 $592,000

Total $592,000
19

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

AIR DEFENSE SECTOR BATTLE CONTROL CENTER LINE-OF-SIGHT 

COMMUNICATIONS

1. Background. Air Defense Sector (ADS) Battle Control Centers (BCC) require the capability 

to communicate via next-generation Ultra High Frequency / Very High Frequency (UHF/VHF) 

channels in high band, anti-jam (HAVE QUICK) and secure modes. BCCs must be able to 

directly manipulate their integrated line-of-sight (LOS) UHF and VHF waveforms by having 

access to the operational radios from their operational position. The communications device 

must be located at the BCCs and the operational connectivity architecture should allow access 

via modem to remote antennae at strategic locations throughout the Area of Operation (AOO). 

Access to these antennae will be on a demand basis, allowing the BCCs to focus their 

communications architecture to desired regions based on weight of operational effort. LOS 

communications are the primary means of communicating with Homeland Defense (HD), 

Aerospace Control Alert (ACA), and Defense Support to Civil Authorities (DSCA) assets. 

While the LOS communications network cannot provide 100 percent coverage of the AOO, it 

must provide the same coverage as the current communications system. The BCCs require LOS 

radios be capable of clear / secure voice and secure data at each ADS location. BCC operators 

must have the capability to adjust the parameters of HAVE QUICK, load / clear crypto real time, 

and switch between red (clear) and green (secure / anti-jam) channels from the operations floor.

2. Source of Need. Battle Control Center Enabling Concept; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC 

Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

WADS McChord AFB, WA 169 ACWS Wheeler AAF, HI

EADS Rome, NY 176 ADS Elmendorf AFB, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 51311F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

100 Communications Suites (3080) $40,000 $4,000,000

Total $4,000,000
20

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
21

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

C-17

The C-17 Globemaster III is the nation’s core 

military airlifter and continues to excel in a wide 

range of operational mission scenarios. It provides 

the flexibility to support both inter-theater and 

intra-theater missions and allows Air Mobility 

Command to significantly improve throughput 

during contingency operations. Using C-17s as an 

intra-theater airlift platform has provided relief to 

the C-130 fleet and reduced ground forces’ 

dependence on vehicle convoys.

The Air National Guard (ANG) currently operates 24 C-17 aircraft assigned to the 105 AW at

Stewart ANGB, NY, 172 AW at Jackson-Evers, MS and 164 AW at Memphis IAP, TN. The 

154 AW at Hickam AFB, HI and the 176 WG at Elmendorf AFB, AK are ANG classic associate 

units. The 167 AW at Eastern WV RAP, WV will begin conversion to C-17s in Fiscal Year 

2014.

The C-17’s aeromedical capability is critical to 

the Air Force mission. These missions require 

non-stop flights from overseas to medical 

centers within the United States. Extended 

range fuel tanks are vital to this mission and 

eliminates the need for in-flight air refueling 

and reduces transit time. Secure line-of-sight / 

beyond line-of-sight data link and internet 

protocol capability with integrated cockpit 

display units will provide aircrews with the 

crucial ability to report and receive battlespace 

information such as position of other aircraft, 

weather, threat, mission events and resource 

status to the crew. 

 Strategic Airlift

 Outsized and Oversized Cargo Airlift

 Aeromedical Evacuation Missions

 ANG C-17 Units Provide 11% of the Total Fleet

C-17 TAB C
22

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

C-17

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

 Extended Range Fuel Tanks

 Block 30 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures 

 Secure Line-of-Sight / Beyond Line-of-Sight Data Link and Internet Protocol Capability 

with Integrated Cockpit Display Unit

 Heads-Up Countermeasures Dispenser Control

 Integrated Class III Electronic Flight Bag

Essential Capabilities List

 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures Enhanced Situational Awareness

 Active Noise Reduction Headsets

 Remote Countermeasures Dispenser System 

 Forward Area and Refueling Point Carts

 Improved Seat Armor

Desired Capabilities List

 Hostile Fire Indicator

 Replacement Heads-Up Display

 Radar Warning Receiver 

 Advanced Situational Awareness Countermeasures System

 Mission Computer Upgrade 
23

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-17 EXTENDED RANGE FUEL TANKS

1. Background. Airlift is the foundation of the nation’s ability to project military power

worldwide. Air National Guard (ANG) C-17A Globemaster IIIs routinely transport troops and 

equipment around the world, provide humanitarian relief and perform Aeromedical Evacuation 

(AE) missions carrying wounded soldiers, sailors, airmen and/or marines. The C-17A, with 

Extended Range (ER) fuel tanks installed, has the capability to carry an additional 65,000 pounds 

of fuel and fly an additional 1,800 NM (empty aircraft) when compared to non-ER C-17As. This 

added capability reduces the need for fuel stops, enables faster cargo delivery and results in less 

wear and tear on the aircraft due to eliminating landing and takeoff cycles. ER fuel tanks also 

reduce the need for air-to-air refueling. ER-modified C-17As are required in most cases to 

perform AE missions departing from European Command bases due to patient requirements 

prohibiting fuel stops. The ER modification is done in conjunction with On Board Inert Gas 

Generating System II (OBIGGS) which reduces the vulnerability of fuel explosion induced by 

small arms fire.

2. Source of Need. Air Mobility Command (AMC) C-17 Requirements and Planning Council 

ranked ER/OBIGGS II #4 out of 53 at the 2013 Executive Session; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

105 AW Stewart ANGB, NY 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 172 AW Jackson-Evers IAP, MS 

164 AW Memphis IAP, TN

4. Program Details. PEC: 41130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

18 Extended Range Fuel Tanks (3010) $12,000,000 $216,000,000

Total $216,000,000
24

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-17 BLOCK 30 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) C-17s operate worldwide in environments where 

Man-Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) Infrared (IR) seeking missiles are widely 

available and represent a significant threat during takeoff and landing. These missiles are 

extremely advanced and are designed to defeat flare-based defensive systems. The Block 30 

Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) system will provide the most effective 

countermeasures against MANPADS. C-17s transferring to the ANG may not arrive with

LAIRCM installed, while those that do usually require upgrade to the Block 30 version from

earlier variants. LAIRCM and its sensors are a prerequisite to having the Next Generation 

AAR-54 missile launch detector. This will provide better IR threat detection and significantly 

increase flare or LAIRCM effectiveness. The upgraded launch detect system allows

crewmembers to see previously blind sectors and react accordingly. New sensors will allow high 

fidelity of IR missile engagements, as well as detection of small arms based on location and 

trajectory. They will also aid in low visibility ground operations and provide better references 

during low visibility approaches.

2. Source of Need. LAIRCM Operational Requirements Document (ORD) 314-92, Aug 1998; 

Air Mobility Command (AMC) Requirements and Planning Council ranked Defensive Systems 

as #6 out of 53 at the Executive Session; AF Form 1067 AMC 11-170, 11-169 and 11-168; 2013 

ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

105 AW Stewart ANGB, NY 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 172 AW Jackson-Evers IAP, MS

164 AW Memphis IAP, TN

4. Program Details. PEC: 41130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

1 Next Generation NRE (3600) $12,000,000 $12,000,000

32 LAIRCM Group A Kits (3010) $2,100,000 $67,200,000

32 LAIRCM Group B Kits (3010) $3,000,000 $96,000,000

96 IR Sensors (3010) $3,000,000 $288,000,000

Total $463,200,000
25

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-17 SECURE LINE-OF-SIGHT / BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT DATA LINK AND 

INTERNET PROTOCOL CAPABILITY WITH INTEGRATED COCKPIT DISPLAY 

UNIT

1. Background. Current information-based dynamic battlespace environments require secure 

airborne data communications with other aircraft, Command and Control (C2) agencies, and 

ground-based forces. Data link (DL) and data transfer will provide aircrews the ability to report 

and receive battlespace information from monitoring C2 agencies such as position of other 

aircraft, weather, threat, mission events, mission status, task completion, resource status, etc. 

This increased situational awareness allows agencies the ability to track mission progress and 

facilitate rapid decisions and adjustments during mission execution. Additionally, near real-time 

aircrew reporting will enable information exchanges with global and theater Air and Space 

Operations Centers (AOC) and Mobility Air Force (MAF) assets (to include those that are 

airborne), which will improve synchronization of supporting and supported forces.

2. Source of Need. Air Mobility Command (AMC) Requirements and Planning Council ranked 

Integrated Real-Time Information in the Cockpit and Data Link #10 out of 50 at the 2013

Executive Session; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

105 AW Stewart ANGB, NY 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 172 AW Jackson-Evers IAP, MS

164 AW Memphis IAP, TN

4. Program Details. PEC: 41130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 NRE (3600) $10,000,000 $10,000,000

32 Group A Kits (3010) $100,000 $3,200,000

32 DL Radios (3010) $330,000 $10,560,000

32 DL Processors (3010) $100,000 $3,200,000

Total $26,960,000
26

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-17 HEADS-UP COUNTERMEASURES DISPENSER CONTROL

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) C-17s operate worldwide in environments where 

Man-Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) Infrared (IR) seeking missiles are widely 

available and represent a significant threat during takeoff and landing. Currently, the Tactics, 

Techniques and Procedures (TTP) for all C-17s are to defeat IR missiles with flares, as not all 

aircraft have the integrated Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) system. In the 

C-17 cockpit, the flare dispenser switch is located on the center pedestal. If crews are required to 

launch flares during an engagement, one crewmember is required to go “heads down” to verify 

flares are launched during this critical phase of flight. The solution places a dispense switch on 

the stick or glare shield allowing the pilot monitoring the flares to remain "heads up" during 

critical phases of flight while dispensing flares simultaneously.

2. Source of Need. 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

105 AW Stewart ANGB, NY 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 172 AW Jackson-Evers IAP, MS

164 AW Memphis IAP, TN

4. Program Details. PEC: 41130

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost 

1 Stick- or Glare Shield-Mounted Flare 

Dispense Switch NRE (3600) $1,500,000 $1,500,000

36 Stick- or Glare Shield-Mounted Flare 

Dispense Switches (3010) $30,000 $1,080,000

Total $2,580,000

* Includes four spares.
27

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-17 INTEGRATED CLASS III ELECTRONIC FLIGHT BAG

1. Background. The definition of an Electronic Flight Bag (EFB), according to the Federal 

Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Advisory Circular (AC) No. 120-76A is, “an electronic display 

system intended primarily for cockpit / flight deck or cabin use. EFB devices can display a 

variety of aviation data or perform basic calculations.” In short, an EFB is an electronic 

information management device that helps to improve situational awareness, cockpit efficiency, 

productivity and safety. EFBs typically consist of a screen and a control unit that may be 

installed, mounted or contained in one sole portable unit. EFBs can electronically store and 

retrieve documents required for flight operations, such as Technical Orders, Air Force 

Instructions, Flight Operations Manual, Minimum Equipment Lists, as well as providing the 

most current Flight Information Publications (FLIP). Additional motivators for using an EFB are 

significant cost savings on annual paper FLIP purchases and the considerable reduction of paper 

waste associated with each FLIP changeover. The potential to receive significant mission 

changes during worldwide cargo and personnel transport missions is extremely high. Aircrews 

need the ability to have all possible mission information and performance calculation capabilities

at their fingertips.

2. Source of Need. Air Mobility Command (AMC) Requirements and Planning Council ranked 

EFB as #24 out of 53 at the 2013 Executive Session; AF Form 1067 AMC 09-164; 2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

105 AW Stewart ANGB, NY 167 AW Eastern WV RAP, WV 172 AW Jackson-Evers IAP, MS

164 AW Memphis IAP, TN

4. Program Details. PEC: 41130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

1 Electronic Flight Bag NRE (3600) $2,400,000 $2,400,000

32 Electronic Flight Bags (3010) $240,000 $7,680,000

Total $10,080,000
28

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
29

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

C-130H/J TAB D

C-130H/J

The C-130 Hercules is the US military’s primary combat delivery aircraft. In addition to its 

primary role in tactical airlift, Air National Guard (ANG) C-130s support humanitarian, 

peacekeeping and disaster relief operations worldwide. Procurement efforts continue to address 

avionics obsolescence and global airspace access, 

propulsion system upgrades, enhanced situational 

awareness, improved self-protection and singlepass precision airdrop. These capabilities will 

ensure the ANG remains viable and relevant in 

tomorrow’s fight.

 Tactical Airlift

 ANG C-130 Units Provide 40% of the Total Fleet
30

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

C-130H/J 

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

C-130H:

 Avionics Obsolescence and Global Airspace Access 

 Propulsion System Upgrades

 Enhanced Situational Awareness

 Improved Self-Protection 

 Single-Pass Precision Airdrop 

C-130J:

 Improved Self-Protection

 Single-Pass Precision Airdrop

 Aircraft Broker / Special Mission Processor

 Tactical Plot Suite

 Cargo Compartment Camera

Essential Capabilities List

C-130H:

 Improved Dual-Mode External Lighting

 Cargo Compartment Modernization

 Three-Dimensional Audio

 Military Secure Precision Global Positioning System Coupled with Flight Management 

System 

C-130J:

 Improved Heads-Up Display readability during Night Vision Instrument System Mode

 Selective Calling Call

 Enhanced Personal Firearms for Aircrew

Desired Capabilities List

C-130H:

 Permanent 115V AC, 60 Hz in Flight Deck

 Wireless Fidelity Systems

C-130J: 

 Wireless Fidelity Systems
31

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-130H AVIONICS OBSOLESCENCE AND GLOBAL AIRSPACE ACCESS

1. Background. The delay of the Avionics Modernization Program (AMP) resulted in a tight 

timeline for Air National Guard (ANG) C-130H models to meet the 2020 deadline for 

international Communications, Navigation and Surveillance / Air Traffic Management

(CNS/ATM) mandates established by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Directive 

Order 242A, and related International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) documents. The 

C-130 fleet faces severe sustainment challenges with mission-required avionics equipment. 

Diminishing manufacturing sources have rendered 25 percent of current avionics obsolete. 

C-130H models will not meet Precision and Area Navigation (P-RNAV) / Automatic Dependent 

Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) requirements to operate worldwide beyond 1 Jan 2020. 

Current cockpit lighting is substandard for Night Vision Goggle (NVG) operations. A modern 

Flight Management System (FMS) with Global Positioning System (GPS) approach capability 

and a modern “glass” flight deck will increase mission capability and training effectiveness rates 

with higher equipment reliability, lower maintenance costs and enhanced safety. Updated 

avionics with ADS-B Out will address CNS/ATM mandates, increase operational effectiveness

and efficiency by opening up airspace that requires more stringent navigational requirements, 

and allow the use of GPS approaches currently prohibited for the legacy C-130 fleet. A glass 

cockpit will reduce crew workload through presentation of a consolidated situational awareness 

picture. Improving the Night Vision Instrument System (NVIS) lighting compatibility will 

ensure compliance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 11-2C130 V3 and Military Standard 

(MIL-STD) 3009, and increase both capability and sustainability to operate safely in night 

environments.

2. Source of Need. FAA Directive Order 242A, 27 May 2010; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC 

Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

103 AW Bradley IAP, CT 136 AW JRB Fort Worth, TX 165 AW Savannah IAP, GA

109 AW Schenectady CAP, NY 139 AW St Joseph AP, MO 166 AW New Castle CAP, DE 

120 AW Great Falls, MT 145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, NC 176 AW JB Elmendorf, AK

123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 179 AW Mansfield-Lohm, OH

130 AW Yeager AP, WV 153 AW Cheyenne RAP, WY 182 AW Peoria IAP, IL

133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN 156 AW Luis Munoz IAP, PR 189 AW Little Rock AFB, AR

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

154 Avionics Kits (3010) $5,700,000 $877,800,000

1 NRE (3600) $50,000,000 $50,000,000

154 NVIS (3010) $465,000 $71,610,000

Total $999,410,000

* Includes 10% spares.
32

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-130H PROPULSION SYSTEM UPGRADES

1. Background. C-130H engines require capability upgrades to operate in high density altitudes 

and hot environments. Additionally, fuselage, avionics and wingbox life span deficiencies drive 

initiatives to reduce the sources of airframe stress through excessive vibrations. Upgrading the 

T-56 engine with the 3.5 engine modification will increase engine life cycle, improve fuel 

economy, reduce takeoff distances and increase the acceptable cargo load. The comprehensive 

solution to propulsion deficiencies include incorporating modular blade technology (NP2000), 

Electronic Propeller Control System (EPCS), and In-flight Propeller Balancing System (IPBS) 

which will provide increased performance, reliability and reduce airframe stress. Oil Cooler 

Augmentation (OCA) is required to decrease engine wear and prevent engine shutdowns during 

ground operations in hot climates. In addition to extending lifespan of the aircraft and its 

avionics this comprehensive solution provides significantly higher safety margins in aircraft 

performance, reduces crew fatigue and decreases maintenance costs both fiscally and in manhours. 

2. Source of Need. 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

103 AW Bradley IAP, CT 136 AW JRB Fort Worth, TX 165 AW Savannah IAP, GA

109 AW Schenectady CAP, NY 139 AW St Joseph AP, MO 166 AW New Castle CAP, DE 

120 AW Great Falls, MT 145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, NC 176 AW JB Elmendorf, AK

123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 179 AW Mansfield-Lohm, OH

130 AW Yeager AP, WV 153 AW Cheyenne RAP, WY 182 AW Peoria IAP, IL

133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN 156 AW Luis Munoz IAP, PR 189 AW Little Rock AFB, AR

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

154 EPCS (3010) $825,000 $127,050,000

1 EPCS/IPBS NRE (3010) $8,000,000 $8,000,000

154 IPBS (3010) $350,000 $53,900,000

154 NP2000 (3010) $2,000,000 $308,000,000

154 OCA (3010) $666,667 $102,666,718

616 T-56 3.5 MOD Engines (3010) $1,400,000 $862,400,000

Total $1,462,016,718

* Includes 10% spares.
33

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-130H ENHANCED SITUATIONAL AWARENESS

1. Background. Combat operations have highlighted the need for comprehensive and 

networked battlespace awareness within the C-130 community. The C-130 Real-Time 

Information in the Cockpit (RTIC) system allows C-130 aircraft to participate on the network by 

utilizing technologies already fielded on other Department of Defense (DOD) assets. Upgrades 

to the C-130 RTIC program will increase the data link capability and provide a common 

processing and display platform for previously federated systems, resulting in a consolidated 

situational awareness picture. Integration with the Advanced Integrated Electronic Combat 

System (AIECS) will provide the capability for on-board / off-board threat correlations, data 

sharing, on-board Radar Threat System geo-location, route re-planning, and automated 

countermeasures. Combining the control and outputs of multiple systems into one common 

graphical interface reduces crew workload, decreases “heads down” time, and provides improved 

decision support for aircrews operating in the tactical environment. Additional shortfalls in 

situational awareness, such as the lack of Terrain Awareness Warning System (TAWS) and 

Electronic Takeoff and Landing Data (ETOLD) systems, degrade Crew Resource Management 

(CRM) and highlight the need to develop, field and sustain these capabilities. Lastly, the 

integration of noise-cancelling and three-dimensional audio in the cockpit will increase 

situational awareness by spatially separating aural warning and radio signals providing angular 

cueing to ground and air threats.

2. Source of Need. Mobility Air Forces (MAF) Network Enabling Concept, 26 Apr 2006; Air 

Mobility Command (AMC) MAF Data Link Integration Technical Requirements Document 

(TRD), 25 Oct 2006; Tactical Data Link Transformation Capability Development Document 

(CDD), Increment 1, Joint Requirements Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM), 23 Jun 

2004; AMC Requirements and Planning Council Mission Essential 2007 and 2008; AMC 

Advanced Situational Awareness Countermeasures (ASACM) CDD, Jan 2008; 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

103 AW Bradley IAP, CT 136 AW JRB Fort Worth, TX 165 AW Savannah IAP, GA

109 AW Schenectady CAP, NY 139 AW St Joseph AP, MO 166 AW New Castle CAP, DE 

120 AW Great Falls, MT 145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, NC 176 AW JB Elmendorf, AK

123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 179 AW Mansfield-Lohm, OH

130 AW Yeager AP, WV 153 AW Cheyenne RAP, WY 182 AW Peoria IAP, IL

133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN 156 AW Luis Munoz IAP, PR 189 AW Little Rock AFB, AR

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

154 AIECS Kits (3010) $150,000 $23,100,000

1 AIECS NRE (3600) $10,000,000 $10,000,000

1 Directional Audio NRE (3600) $5,000,000 $5,000,000

155 Directional Kits (3010) $50,000 $7,750,000

Total $45,850,000
34

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-130H/J IMPROVED SELF-PROTECTION

1. Background. C-130 aircraft perform demanding missions in close proximity to ManPortable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) and Radio Frequency (RF) threats. Current 

Combatant Command (COCOM) plans rely heavily on airlift for logistical support to front-line 

troops requiring C-130s to operate closer to adversary tactical Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) 

systems. The AN/AAQ-24 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) Block 30 

system provides the most capable countermeasures against MANPADS threats with the latest 

Infrared (IR) sensors. The Block 30 configuration, being fielded on Air Mobility Command 

(AMC) C-17 aircraft, delivers greater warning, lower false alarm rates and higher reliability. At 

present, several of the Air National Guard (ANG) C-130Hs have limited RF detection capability. 

A Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) is a requirement for all ANG C-130 aircraft to employ in 

worldwide Anti-Access / Area Denial (A2/AD) combat operations.

2. Source of Need. AMC Advanced Situational Awareness Countermeasures (ASACM) 

Capability Development Document (CDD), Jan 2008; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

103 AW Bradley IAP, CT 139 AW St Joseph AP, MO 165 AW Savannah IAP, GA

109 AW Schenectady CAP, NY 143 AW Quonset SAP, RI 166 AW New Castle CAP, DE

120 AW Great Falls, MT 145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, NC 176 AW JB Elmendorf, AK

123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 146 AW Channel Islands ANGS, CA 179 AW Mansfield-Lohm, OH

130 AW Yeager AP, WV 152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 182 AW Peoria IAP, IL

133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN 153 AW Cheyenne AP, WY 189 AW Little Rock AFB, AR

136 AW JRB Fort Worth, TX 156 AW Luis Munoz IAP, PR

4. Program Details. PEC: (C-130H) 41115, (C-130J) 41132

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

16 C-130J LAIRCM Group A Kits (3010) $970,000 $15,520,000

8 C-130J LAIRCM Group B Kits (3010) $4,400,000 $35,200,000

158 C-130H/J NexGen Group A Kits (3010) $420,000 $66,360,000

40 C-130H/J NexGen Group B Kits (3010) $774,855 $30,994,200

Total $148,074,200
35

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-130H/J SINGLE-PASS PRECISION AIRDROP

1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) C-130 fleet has several shortfalls in its ability 

to accurately deliver airdrop loads in Contested and Degraded Operations (CDO) in both 

Instrument and Visual Meteorological Conditions (IMC/VMC). The US Army’s objective for 

airdrop accuracy is 50 meters Circular Error Average (CEA); traditional methods provide 

300-meter CEA accuracy. Current precision airdrop methods require multiple passes (increased 

exposure to threats) over the drop zone for atmospheric calculations before dropping actual 

bundles. Effective airdrop operations require early identification of the drop zone (crucial during 

on-call operations), real-time Airdrop Damage Estimates (ADE), real-time winds (altitude to 

surface), displayed Continuously Calculated Impact Point (CCIP) / Launch Acceptability Region 

(LAR), and post drop assessment. Targeting pods with Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) 

can provide this capability during VMC operations, especially in CDO. Software and hardware 

upgrades to the APN-241 Radar will provide Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and wind sensing 

to meet these requirements in IMC airdrops. Radar upgrades along with the addition of targeting 

pods provide a highly accurate all-weather single-pass airdrop capability with significant 

reduction in human induced errors. Additionally, these capabilities can be utilized during 

domestic and contingency operations.

2. Source of Need. Mission Need Statement (MNS) Air Mobility Command (AMC) / Combat 

Air Forces (CAF) / Air Education and Training Command (AETC) / Air Force Special 

Operations Command (AFSOC) / Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) 301-97; C-130 

Avionics Modernization Program (AMP) System Requirement Document, 31 March 2000; 

Required Theater CEA/Mitigate ADE; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

103 AW Bradley IAP, CT 139 AW St Joseph AP, MO 165 AW Savannah IAP, GA

109 AW Schenectady CAP, NY 143 AW Quonset SAP, RI 166 AW New Castle CAP, DE

120 AW Great Falls, MT 145 AW Charlotte-Douglas IAP, NC 176 AW JB Elmendorf, AK

123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 146 AW Channel Islands ANGS, CA 179 AW Mansfield-Lohm, OH

130 AW Yeager AP, WV 152 AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 182 AW Peoria IAP, IL

133 AW Mpls-St Paul IAP, MN 153 AW Cheyenne AP, WY 189 AW Little Rock AFB, AR

136 AW JRB Fort Worth, TX 156 AW Luis Munoz IAP, PR

4. Program Details. PEC: (C-130H) 41115, (C-130J) 41132

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 APN-241 Radar Upgrade (3010) $3,000,000 $3,000,000

1 Laser Designator Pod NRE (3600) $16,000,000 $16,000,000

77 Laser Designator Pods (3010) $2,000,000 $154,000,000

Total $173,000,000
36

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-130J AIRCRAFT BROKER / SPECIAL MISSION PROCESSOR

1. Background. To operate in future contingencies, with constantly changing enemy tactics and 

increased mission demands, C-130Js require a nimble processing system to negotiate the 

dynamic tactical environment. Examples of emerging systems processed by an integrated 

aircraft broker include Tactical Data Link, Communications, Navigation and Surveillance / Air 

Traffic Management (CNS/ATM), Digital Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), Joint Precision 

Airdrop System (JPADS), and new parachute ballistic calculations for airdrop. The current 

aircraft improvement process hinders system enhancements until programmed block upgrades 

occur. This yields complicated, non-integrated workarounds while aircrew await the contracted 

aircraft update cycles. Acquiring an aircraft broker / Special Mission Processor (SMP) allows 

immediate access to the 1553 data bus. This rapid plug-and-play capability is more cost 

effective, meets the time-sensitive needs of the warfighter, and presents a system-integrated 

solution, which is pivotal to the C-130J two-man cockpit.

2. Source of Need. Air Mobility Command (AMC) Tactics Review Board (TRB) 2012-2013; 

2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

143 AW Quonset State, RI 146 AW Channel Islands, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132

Remaining Quantities Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 NRE (3010) $5,000,000 $5,000,000

18 Aircraft Broker / Special Mission 

Processor Kits (3010) $120,000 $2,160,000

Total $7,160,000
37

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-130J TACTICAL PLOT SUITE

1. Background. The C-130J’s current software suite permits the use of only 10 Tactical Plots 

(TAC PLOT), which are limited to a circular dimension. Aircrews currently use these TAC 

PLOTs to display factor airspace and threats “under the glass” on the C-130J Digital Map, the 

Navigation Radar Display, the Terrain Awareness Warning System (TAWS) display, and 

Coordinated Aircraft Position / Station Keeping Equipment (CAP/SKE). The current 10 circular 

TAC PLOTS are not adequate to display the robust tactical airspace picture where killbox / 

keypads, political borders, Restricted Operating Zones (ROZs), and departure / arrival corridors. 

A TAC PLOT suite for the C-5M has already been developed, and similar software code is 

required for the C-130J. This software can be easily interfaced with the C-130J Mission 

Computer (MC), Communication Navigation Interface-Management Unit (CNI-MU) and Heads 

Down Displays (HDD). This TAC PLOT suite allows the plotting of accurate killbox / keypads, 

arrival / departure sectors, and zone plotting where pilots can use multiple waypoints to draw 

uniquely structured airspace. Lastly, this software allows 50 entries of each type of TAC PLOT.

2. Source of Need. Air Mobility Command (AMC) Tactics Review Board (TRB) 2012-2013; 

2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

143 AW Quonset State, RI 146 AW Channel Islands, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132

Remaining Quantities Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 NRE (3600) $5,000,000 $5,000,000

Total $5,000,000
38

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-130J CARGO COMPARTMENT CAMERA

1. Background. C-130J aircrews require the capability to monitor activity within the cargo 

compartment during heavy equipment airdrops and Engine Running On-load and Off-load 

(ERO) operations. This capability permits operations within the cargo compartment to be 

simultaneously monitored in the cargo compartment and on the flight deck. In addition, the 

ability to monitor parachute deployments, condition of extraction parachutes, cargo pallet 

extraction, as well as personnel movement within the cargo compartment is required. This 

solution, to include all sensors, controls and displays, must be Night Vision Goggle (NVG) 

compatible. The existing C-130J crew complement does not permit using a primary 

crewmember to serve as a safety observer for operations within the cargo compartment during 

ERO operations. Safety observation is accomplished by the navigator in the C-130E/H aircraft 

and through the use of a pilot observation bubble on the C-17.

2. Source of Need. Air Mobility Command (AMC) Requirements and Planning Council 

Essential Item; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

143 AW Quonset SAP, RI 146 AW Channel Islands ANGS, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132

Remaining Quantities Required Unit Cost Program Cost

18 Cargo Compartment Camera Kits (3010) $350,000 $6,300,000

1 NRE (3600) $2,000,000 $2,000,000

Total $8,300,000
39

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

C-130 

Special Mission

C-130 Special Mission TAB E

EC-130J - The EC-130J “Commando Solo” conducts 

information operations, psychological operations and civil 

affairs broadcasts. Procurement efforts continue for the Large 

Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) system, tactical 

data link secure line-of-sight / beyond line-of-sight

(SLOS/BLOS) capabilities, radio communication upgrades 

and loadmaster crashworthy seats.

HC/MC-130 - The Air National Guard (ANG) provides 35 percent of the 

Air Force’s (AF) HC/MC-130 personnel recovery capability. ANG 

HC/MC-130 units continue to deploy in support of Overseas Contingency 

Operations (OCO) and provide emergency rescue and relief support 

during Domestic Operations (DOMOPS). Upcoming modernization 

efforts for the ANG HC/MC-130 fleet include loadmaster crashworthy 

seats, Aircrew Flight Equipment Racks, Electro-Optical / Infrared 

(EO/IR) Sensor Upgrades and Heavy Equipment (HE) airdrop capability.

LC-130 - ANG LC-130Hs from Schenectady, NY have ski-equipped landing gear to enable 

landings and takeoffs on snow and ice. The current fleet consists of six AF-owned and four 

National Science Foundation (NSF)-owned aircraft. The LC-130 operates on snowfields in 

remote areas of the Polar Regions in support of the NSF. In order to keep the aircraft up-to-date, 

several modification efforts are underway including the Electronic Propeller Control System 

(EPCS), eight-bladed propellers and the Crevasse Detection Radar (CDR). The ANG is also 

working with the NSF on the development of a pod-based scientific payload capability for the 

LC-130s.

 Commando Solo 

 Special Operations Forces / Personnel Recovery (PR)

 Special Mission (Airborne Firefighting, Antarctic Logistics)

 ANG Commando Solos Provide 100% of the Total Fleet

 ANG PR HC/MC-130s Units Provide 35% of the Total Fleet

 ANG LC-130s Provide 100% of the Total Fleet
40

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

C-130 Special Mission

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

EC-130J:

 Communication / Situational Awareness 

Suite

 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures

 Mission Information Support Operations 

System

 Intelligence, Surveillance and 

Reconnaissance 

HC/MC-130P/N:

 Integrated Beyond Line-of-Sight /

Secure Line-of-Sight Data Link 

 Information Superiority 

 Combat Penetrator Suite

 Enhanced Engine and Propeller 

Performance

 Mission Flexible Refueling and Airdrop 

Capability

LC-130H: 

 Propulsion Improvements

 Retractable External Arm and Crevasse 

Detection Radar

 Flight Deck Night Vision Goggle

Compatibility

 Flight Deck Communications Upgrade

 Avionics Obsolescence and Global 

Airspace Access

Essential Capabilities List

EC-130J:

 Single-Pass Precision Guided Airdrop

 Emergency Equipment Bins

 Increased Aircraft Fuel Capacity

HC/MC-130P/N:

 Variable Speed Drogue

 Gas Turbine Compressor to Auxiliary 

Power Unit Upgrade

 Communications, Navigation and 

Surveillance / Air Traffic Management

Compliant Avionics

 Distributed Mission Operations and 

Training

 Roll-on/Roll-off External Arm

Desired Capabilities List

HC/MC-130P/N: 

 Visual Threat Recognition and 

Avoidance Training

 Global Positioning System Internal 

Repeater

 Radar Altimeter on Copilot Instrument 

Panel

 Altitude Alerter

 Terrain Following / Terrain Avoidance 

Low-Level Navigation
41

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

EC-130J COMMUNICATION / SITUATIONAL AWARENESS SUITE

1. Background. Special Operations Forces Air Mission Suite / Enhanced Situational 

Awareness (SAMS/ESA) is the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) standard 

situational awareness system to be installed on all of the command’s airframes. The system is a 

computer network-based communication and data link integration system. It consists of multiple 

line-of-sight (LOS) and over-the-horizon radios, an electronic flight publication database, 

software for in-flight planning and re-planning, secure internet, and live video reception and 

transmission. These capabilities are provided to the crew through dedicated Multi-Function 

Color Displays. SAMS/ESA Phase 1 has been funded for EC-130s, but a follow-on Phase 2 

capability is still required. Phase 1 of SAMS/ESA includes Situational Awareness Data Link

(SADL), beyond line-of-sight and LOS radios, Air Force Tactical Receiver System-Ruggedized

(AFTRS-R), touch screen displays and ruggedized computers. Phase 2 will provide Full Motion 

Video send and receive capability. Additionally, all AFSOC aircraft require Satellite 

Communications (SATCOM) to conduct tasked United States Special Operations Command 

(USSOCOM) missions. Currently four EC-130J aircraft are utilizing a nonintegrated manportable PRC-117 SATCOM radio.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 AFSOC 11104 and 09037; USSOCOM Lesson Learned and 

TERESA Capability Development Document (CDD); 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

8 Full Motion Video (3010) $500,000 $4,000,000

8 Mobile Broadband Modems (3010) $50,000 $400,000

4 ARC-210 Gen V Upgrades (3010) $500,000 $2,000,000

4 SATCOM Radios (3010) $1,000,000 $4,000,000

Total $10,400,000
42

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

EC-130J LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) EC-130Js perform demanding missions worldwide 

in a low-to-medium threat environment where shoulder-fired Man-Portable Air Defense System 

(MANPADS) Infrared (IR) seeking missiles are widely available creating a significant threat 

during all phases of flight. The ANG requires the AN/AAQ-24 Large Aircraft Infrared 

Countermeasures (LAIRCM) system, which provides the best countermeasures against 

MANPADS threats and does not rely on pyrotechnic expendables. The Next Generation 

(NexGen) configuration, currently being fielded, is comprised of two Guardian Laser 

Transmitter Assemblies, five NexGen Ultra Violet sensors, one processor, and one Control 

Indicator Unit that would provide greater warning, fewer false alarm rates and higher reliability. 

Currently, two of seven aircraft have been modified with Group A wiring, and testing is 

complete.

2. Source of Need. LAIRCM Operational Requirements Document (ORD) 314-92, Aug 1998; 

Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) Statement of Need, 001-91, Infrared 

Countermeasures Improvements; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted. 

193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

5 LAIRCM Group A Kits (3010) $1,212,500 $6,062,500

6 LAIRCM Group B Kits (3010) $4,000,000 $24,000,000

5 NexGen Group A Kits (3010) $420,000 $2,100,000

6 NexGen Group B Kits (3010) $774,855 $4,649,130

Total $36,811,630
43

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

EC-130J MISSION INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS SYSTEM

1. Background. Only three of the seven EC-130J aircraft are fully capable of performing the 

primary mission of Mission Information Support Operations (MISO) broadcasting. The 

Removable Airborne Mission System is a combination of the Fly-Away Broadcast System 

(FABS) and a retractable external arm. The FABS is a US Army developed and fielded portable 

transmitter system used to broadcast MISO messages. This is a low-cost solution to mounting 

systems on C-130 aircraft without the need for permanent modifications to either the airframe or 

power systems. Systems are designed to be installed in just 2 to 3 hours and use existing power 

ports, cargo floor and/or cargo rails. Some systems are palletized; thus, they can potentially be 

configured in the cargo compartment allowing for cargo or personnel delivery and parallel 

employment of the system. The retractable external arm makes the aircraft multi-mission 

capable and is a system capable of holding multiple pod mounted sensors, kinetic weapons, 

airborne imaging and/or antennae.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) 10041; 

Lessons Learned from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) and IRAQI FREEDOM

(OIF); 193d Special Operations Wing Strategic Way Ahead FY12-37; 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 Crashworthy Seat Kit (3010) $60,000 $60,000

1 FABS NRE (3600) $6,000,000 $6,000,000

4 FABS Operator Stations (3010) $750,000 $3,000,000

8 FABS Systems (3010) $500,000 $4,000,000

7 Retractable Arm Kits (3010) $1,245,714 $8,719,998

Total $21,779,998
44

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

EC-130J INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAISSANCE

1. Background. The Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) Commander identified 

the 193d Special Operation Wing’s C-130J, with its sustained loiter time, to support an 

immediate theater requirement to provide Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) 

capability. There is an immediate need to install a retractable external arm and an ISR collection 

system on a C-130J. The retractable external arm requires a crashworthy seat for the observer 

and the system should be equipped with a sensor turret with appropriate controls and recording 

equipment at the work station. The system must include the capability to store and transfer ISR 

data to a Processing, Exploitation and Dissemination (PED) ground station post-mission and 

should be capable of beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) transmissions. Additionally, the system 

should transmit Full Motion Video (FMV) to line-of-sight (LOS) ground forces via current 

Special Operations Forces video transmission devices. The retractable external arm is a flexible 

system capable of holding multiple pod-mounted sensors, kinetic weapons, Remotely Piloted 

Aircraft (RPA) control systems and/or antennae, and would make the aircraft multi-mission 

capable.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 AFSOC #12047; 193d Special Operations Wing Strategic 

Plan FY12-37; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27253

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 Crashworthy Seat Kit (3010) $60,000 $60,000

1 ISR NRE (3600) $2,000,000 $2,000,000

7 Electro-Optical / Infrared Sensors (3010) $1,600,000 $11,200,000

7 Retractable Arm Kits (3010) $1,245,714 $8,719,998

Total $21,979,998
45

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

HC/MC-130P/N INTEGRATED BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT / SECURE LINE-OFSIGHT DATA LINK

1. Background. Installation of a Tactical Data Link (TDL) provides comprehensive Command 

and Control (C2) and maximizes HC/MC-130P/N aircrew situational awareness with beyond

line-of-sight (BLOS) and secure line-of-sight (SLOS) capabilities. It provides critical real-time 

data to aircrews so they can participate in the present day network-centric battlespace. A TDL 

capability should be compatible with any situational awareness cockpit display unit utilized by 

the community; and compatible with existing Task Force TDL technology. To comply with 

Personnel Recovery (PR) doctrine the HC/MC-130P/N must perform as an Airborne Mission 

Commander, Rescue Mission Commander and On-Scene Commander requiring crucial gateways 

that allow different data links to communicate. Current survival radios require additional 

upgrades in order to keep up with new technology such as the Combat Survivor Evader Locator

(CSEL) radio to avoid a capability gap in locating survivors. Secure Internet Protocol data will 

enable aircrews to receive near real-time Blue Force data and text messaging from the battlefield.

Blue Force Tracker (BFT) is a modernized joint tracking system which is complimentary with 

Situational Awareness Data Link and Link-16 providing BLOS interactive data communication 

between aviation assets and C2.

2. Source of Need. Mobility Air Forces (MAF) Network Enabling Concept, 26 Apr 2006; Air 

Mobility Command (AMC) MAF Data Link Integration Technical Requirements Document 

(TRD), 25 Oct 2006; Tactical Data Link Transformation Capability Development Document

(CDD), Increment 1, Joint Requirements Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM), 23 Jun 

2004; AMC Requirements and Planning Council Mission Essential 07/08; Real-Time 

Information in the Cockpit (RTIC); Global Information Grid Capability Requirements Document 

(CRD), JROCM 134-01, 30 Aug 2001; Air Force Tactical Data Link Master Plan; 2012-2013

ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: (HC-130) 27224, (MC-130) 27230

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

13 BFT Kits (3010) $100,000 $1,300,000

13 Gateway Kits (3010) $500,000 $6,500,000

1 Gateway NRE (3600) $1,000,000 $1,000,000

Total $8,800,000
46

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

HC/MC-130P/N INFORMATION SUPERIORITY

1. Background. Rescues performed in combat and during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina 

highlighted the need to modernize the HC/MC-130P/N situational awareness capability. Realtime information exchange is paramount during personnel recovery operations, requiring great 

precision and speed in asymmetric battlespace environments. Recent technical advancements 

provide the means to integrate existing HC/MC-130P/N sensors with modern processors and data 

links facilitating superior Command and Control (C2) and tactical coordination from either an 

overhead or offset orbit. Having an integrated eye-safe laser range finder, illuminator and 

designator capability in a state-of-the-art Electro-Optical / Infrared (EO/IR) sensor that can Find, 

Fix, Track and Target (F2T2) targets of interest, or to precisely determine survivor location 

information, expedites recovery and increases survivability. Equipping HC/MC-130P/N aircraft 

with an enhanced EO/IR sensor capable of Full Motion Video (FMV) relieves reliance on highdemand Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) assets. In order for rescue forces to 

fully support Information Superiority operations they require the ability to utilize the Internet 

while on board the aircraft. The Internet-on-Board (IOB) allows for efficient information 

sharing across a digital network. The final requirement of Information Superiority is to bring 

real-time threat situational awareness into the flight deck to increase crew survivability. The Air 

Force Tactical Receiver System-Ruggedized (AFTRS-R) is a proven system currently in use on 

other weapons systems that is an ideal solution for the Combat King aircraft.

2. Source of Need. Personnel Recovery Core Function Master Plan; Air Mobility Command 

(AMC), RMC and OSC duties as outlined in Air Force Tactics, Techniques and Procedures 

(AFTTP) 3-3.HC/MC-130; AMC Requirements and Planning Council Mission Essential 07/08; 

Real-Time Information in the Cockpit; Global Information Grid CRD; Joint Requirements 

Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM) 134-01, 30 Aug 2001; AF Form 1067 Air Combat 

Command (ACC) 11-296 and 11-359, 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: (HC-130) 27224, (MC-130) 27230

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

13 EO/IR Sensor Upgrades (3010) $1,075,000 $13,975,000

13 FMV (3010) $192,300 $2,499,900

13 IOB (3010) $50,000 $650,000

1 NRE (3010) $15,000,000 $15,000,000

13 AFTRS-R (3010) $100,000 $1,300,000

Total $33,424,900
47

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

HC/MC-130P/N COMBAT PENETRATOR SUITE

1. Background. The HC/MC-130P/N rescue platform has limited ability to counter radar 

threats. In order to operate in a high threat environment, the HC/MC-130P/N requires a Radio 

Frequency (RF) jammer, improved radar detection capability, integrated defensive systems 

capable of supporting three-dimensional (3-D) audio, and a Hostile Fire Indicator (HFI). 

Improved radar detection will provide more sensitivity and improved range and accuracy for 

supplying the crew with information on radar threat type and location. An RF jammer will allow 

the Combat Search and Rescue Task Force to perform rescues in an elevated radar threat 

environment. The ALQ-213 Electronic Combat system is required to integrate these Electronic 

Warfare systems, providing easy-to-understand information which will allow for timely threat 

reactions by the crew. The ALQ-213 will also pave the way for future growth into 3-D audio 

and the Virtual Electronic Countermeasure Training System (VECTS), which provides advanced 

training to the crews and further increases their likelihood of surviving a threat engagement. The 

next generation HFI is capable of detecting small arms and rocket propelled grenade fire which 

cannot be detected by current aircraft defensive systems even though they are widely proliferated 

in virtually every threat environment.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 Air Combat Command (ACC) 12-029; Personnel Recovery 

Core Function Master Plan; Lessons Learned from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) 

and IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF); US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) Capability 

Development Document (CDD), 27 Feb 2013; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: (HC-130) 27224F, (MC-130) 27230F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

13 Enhanced RF Detection Systems (3010) $1,300,000 $16,900,000

1 Enhanced RF Detection NRE (3600) $2,000,000 $2,000,000

13 Hostile Fire Indicators (3010) $270,000 $3,510,000

13 RF Jammers (3010) $5,000,000 $65,000,000

1 RF Jammer NRE (3600) $5,000,000 $5,000,000

Total $92,410,000
48

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

HC/MC-130P/N ENHANCED ENGINE AND PROPELLER PERFORMANCE 

1. Background. Currently the HC/MC-130P/N aircraft is performance-limited creating a safety 

hazard for the aircrew. They routinely operate with the heavy gross weights associated with fuel 

loads for Helicopter Air-to-Air Refueling (HAAR) and Forward Area Refueling Point (FARP), 

and fly in conditions with high outside air temperatures and high pressure altitudes. The 

HC/MC-130P/N also operates in the low-altitude environment (<500 feet) in mountainous 

terrain, requiring enhanced engine performance in order to prevent Controlled Flight Into Terrain

(CFIT) incidents. Multiple aircraft upgrades are required to include the Electronic Propeller

Control System (EPCS), NP2000, Oil Cooler Augmentation (OCA), In-Flight Propeller 

Balancing (IFPB) system, and Electronic Takeoff and Landing Data (ETOLD). The EPCS 

enhances performance because of improved synchrophasing during ground operations and 

improved thrust responsiveness from the controls (very little delay after making throttle 

adjustments). The NP2000 is an eight-bladed, composite propeller that significantly improves 

the thrust output of the current HC/MC-130P/N engines during takeoff and at low altitude. The 

OCA is critical for FARP operations in desert climates and humanitarian operations for the older 

HC/MC-130Ps that have difficulty keeping engine oil from overheating in hot desert 

environments. The IFPB system eliminates the need for regular maintenance and results in 

reduced noise, less damage from vibration, and improved aircraft availability. ETOLD is a 

system that electronically calculates engine performance data and significantly reduces the time a 

crewmember spends manually extracting the information from charts. 

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 Air Combat Command (ACC) 10-242, 11-358 and 11-360; 

2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability. 

3. Units Impacted.

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: (HC-130) 27224, (MC-130) 27230

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

13 EPCS (3010) $879,000 $11,427,000

1 EPCS, IFPB and NP2000 NRE (3600) $6,000,000 $6,000,000

13 IFPB (3010) $350,000 $4,550,000

13 NP2000 (3010) $2,200,000 $28,600,000

Total $50,577,000
49

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

HC/MC-130P/N MISSION FLEXIBLE REFUELING AND AIRDROP CAPABILITY

1. Background. The HC/MC-130P/N has recently been modified with the dual-rail system 

which increases the mission capability of the aircraft. The increased mission capability requires 

a more survivable and capable cargo compartment, to include an Aircrew Flight Equipment 

(AFE) Rack, Palletized Fuel Tank, and Heavy Equipment (HE) Airdrop capability. A 

standardized equipment rack is required so that storage of loose items will not interfere with a 

palletized fuel tank, Benson fuel tank, cargo on-loading and off-loading, and airdrop operations. 

Non-standard loading of rescue equipment and AFE create a potential safety hazard by having 

loose items in the cargo compartment. A palletized fuel tank compatible with the dual-rails will 

allow for more expeditious reconfiguration that will provide greater mission flexibility to support 

Hot Refueling and Forward Area Refueling Point (FARP) Operations. It is also capable of 

withstanding small arms fire and is equipped with fire retardant material creating a safer flight 

environment. H/MC-130 aircraft currently have low speed air refueling drogues to refuel 

helicopters. These low speed drogues are not capable of refueling higher speed aircraft such as 

the CV-22. Variable or high speed drogues are required to increase refueling capabilities. In 

order to support evolving rescue missions the HC/MC-130P/N aircraft must be capable of 

supporting Guardian Angel requirements by conducting HE airdrops for large terrain and ocean 

rescue craft.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 Air Combat Command (ACC) 11-322, 12-062, 13-235 and 

13-236; Class A Mishap MC-130P 20020213FTEV016A Safety Investigation Board (SIB) 

Recommendation; 20020612FTEV033A Report, ORS 6, Fall 04-07; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC 

Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: (HC-130) 27224, (MC-130) 27230

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

9 Dual-Rail Fuel Tanks (3010) $1,800,000 $16,200,000

13 High Speed Drogues (3010) $100,000 $1,300,000

9 FARP Kits (3010) $70,000 $630,000

Total $18,130,000
50

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

LC-130H PROPULSION IMPROVEMENTS 

1. Background. The LC-130 mission requires operation out of austere environments and 

landing on deep field runways and unimproved snow and ice. In order to ensure successful 

takeoff from deep field bases, the use of Jet Assisted Take-Off (JATO) rocket motors is required. 

Dwindling supplies of circa-1950s JATO motors will require replacements at a cost of more than 

$6 million per year. The NP2000 is an eight-bladed, composite propeller that improves thrust 

20 percent over the current LC-130 propeller during takeoff, negating the need for JATO in most 

cases, while reducing vibration and shock. The Electronic Propeller Control System (EPCS) is a 

prerequisite and integral subsystem of the NP2000. It replaces current mechanical valve 

housings and synchrophasers (1970s design) with modern electronic valve housings and 

propeller controls, improving responsiveness while eliminating the need for regularly scheduled 

maintenance required by the mechanical system. Regular propeller balancing is difficult to 

accomplish at bare-base locations and reduces aircraft availability when down for maintenance. 

The In-Flight Propeller Balancing (IFPB) system eliminates the need for regular maintenance as 

the propeller is continuously balanced during operation. The IFPB virtually eliminates propeller 

balance induced vibration, which equates to reduced noise, less damage and improved aircraft 

availability. All these systems combine for an increase in performance, system reliability, 

improved aircraft availability and an estimated 20 percent reduction in required maintenance.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 National Guard Bureau A4MY NP2000 11-066, 10 Oct 

2011; AF Form 1067 EPCS 09-003, 31 May 2011; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

109 AW Schenectady, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

1 EPCS Spares (3010) $1,500,000 $1,500,000

10 IFPB (3010) $350,000 $3,500,000

1 IFPB NRE (3600) $3,000,000 $3,000,000

10 NP2000 (3010) $2,000,000 $20,000,000

1 NP2000 NRE (3010) $5,000,000 $5,000,000

Total $33,000,000

* Includes 10% spares.
51

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

LC-130H RETRACTABLE EXTERNAL ARM AND CREVASSE DETECTION RADAR

1. Background. Over the last four decades, LC-130H aircraft have sustained serious damage 

while landing on unsurveyed ice- and snow-covered areas. Current methods to identify hazards 

with national imaging assets entail long lead times and increasing unreliability. The 109th Airlift 

Wing (AW) has a need for Crevasse Detection Radar (CDR) with additional capabilities 

including survivability enhancements, polar search and rescue, and airborne sensing. The Air 

National Guard (ANG) completed the evaluation and implementation of Sandia Labs X-band 

radar that meets the requirement. The system is fielded but additional changes are required to 

improve the performance and operational capabilities of the system. Also, the CDR is mounted 

on the aircraft using a flexible external articulating arm. Additional effort is required to establish 

the retractable external arm as a permanent modification to the LC-130H fleet. Although 

partially funded, additional funding is required for updating and supporting the CDR and the 

retractable external arm.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 National Guard Bureau (NGB) A4MY 07-007, 19 Nov 

2004; AF Form 1067 NGB A4MY 11-012, 15 Apr 2011; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

109 AW Schenectady, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 CDR Operational Improvements (3010) $1,000,000 $1,000,000

1 Retractable External Arm Modification (3010) $1,000,000 $1,000,000

Total $2,000,000
52

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

LC-130H FLIGHT DECK NIGHT VISION GOGGLE COMPATABILITY

1. Background. The 109th Airlift Wing (AW) has seven LC-130Hs that are not Night Vision 

Goggle (NVG) compatible. In accordance with regulations and current procedures, NVG 

operations have become a core competency of the US Air Force, particularly in mobility aircraft. 

All C-130 aircrew deploying to combat zones are required to be proficient in Air Force Tactics 

Techniques and Procedures (AFTTP) 3-3.C-130E/H, Air Force Instruction (AFI) 11-2C-130V1, 

and V3 NVG guidance. As the arctic air operations grow in importance, LC-130Hs and crews 

will be tasked to perform Search and Rescue (SAR) and air-land / airdrop using NVG operations. 

The drawbacks of non-compatible aircraft are self-evident as aircrew members go overdue on 

NVG events due to lack of a compatible aircraft. All LC-130Hs should be standardized and 

available for crews to maintain NVG currency and proficiency to safely and efficiently execute 

all of the unit's missions. In order to take full advantage of NVG operations, a complete covert 

lighting solution must be employed, to include NVG cargo loading operations. Finally, current 

dual mode landing lights are barely adequate when using overt lighting for takeoff and landing. 

A new light is being developed that would offer improved overt and covert lighting performance 

when compared to the standard dual mode lamp currently being used.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 National Guard Bureau A4MY 09-060, 8 Mar 2010; 2012-

2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

109 AW Schenectady, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

7 Cockpit NVG Upgrades (3010) $375,000 $2,625,000

1 NVG NRE (3010) $1,000,000 $1,000,000

10 Cargo Compartment NVG Upgrades (3010) $41,000 $410,000

10 Dual Mode Landing Light Wiring (3010) $14,000 $140,000

11 Upgraded Dual Mode Landing Lights (3010) $8,000 $88,000

Total $4,263,000

* Includes 10% spares.
53

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

LC-130H FLIGHT DECK COMMUNICATIONS UPGRADE

1. Background. The LC-130 requires a long-range beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) 

communications capability due to the mission’s remote polar locations. Satellite 

Communications (SATCOM) are limited at polar high latitudes and High Frequency (HF) radios 

are unreliable during periods of high solar flare activity. Weather, Air Traffic Control (ATC) 

and Command and Control (C2) communications (voice and text) are critical to ensure safe flight 

operations in Antarctica and the Arctic. The LC-130H currently uses a portable system with the 

Iridium phone and associated components all housed in a tailored pelican case. Although 

functional, the pelican case is not a robust package and can affect reliability. Window-mounted 

antennas have poor reception and the sextant port antenna needs to be frequently removed for 

celestial navigation. Additionally, the non-integrated, portable system becomes a hazard with 

exposed wires on the flight deck and often needs repair due to fragile connections. The Air 

National Guard (ANG) requires a permanently installed Iridium voice and data solution with an 

external flush-mount antenna, and secure communication with text messaging.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 National Guard Bureau A4MA 20070212; 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted. 

109 AW Schenectady CAP, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

11 Flight Deck Upgrades (3010) $100,000 $1,100,000

1 Communications NRE (3010) $1,000,000 $1,000,000

Total $2,100,000

* Includes 10% spares.
54

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

LC-130H AVIONICS OBSOLESCENCE AND GLOBAL AIRSPACE ACCESS

1. Background. The delay of the Avionics Modernization Program (AMP) has established a 

very short timeline for Air National Guard (ANG) LC-130H models to meet the year 2020 

deadline for international Communications, Navigation and Surveillance / Air Traffic 

Management (CNS/ATM) mandates established by International Civil Aviation Organization 

(ICAO). As of now, all C-130H models will not meet Precision and Area Navigation (P-RNAV)

and Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) requirements to operate worldwide 

beyond 1 Jan 2020. The LC-130 fleet is also facing severe sustainability challenges with 

mission-required avionics equipment. Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) challenges 

have rendered 25 percent of current avionics obsolete. A modern Flight Management System 

(FMS) with Global Positioning System (GPS) approach capability and a modern glass cockpit 

will reduce crew workload through presentation of a consolidated situational awareness picture, 

and increase mission capability and training effectiveness rates with higher equipment reliability, 

lower maintenance costs, and enhance flight safety. Updated avionics with ADS-B Out will 

address CNS/ATM mandates, address the DMS issues, and increase operational effectiveness 

and efficiency by opening up airspace that requires more stringent navigational requirements, 

and supports GPS approaches currently prohibited for the legacy C-130 fleet.

2. Source of Need. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Directive Order 242A; 2012-2013 

ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

109 AW Schenectady CAP, NY

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

1 CNS / ATM NRE (3600) $5,000,000 $5,000,000

10 Avionics Kits (3010) $5,700,000 $57,000,000

Total $62,000,000

* Includes 10% spares.
55

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

E-8C 

&

C-32B TA

B

F

E-8C & C-32B

 Robust “Sensor-To-Shooter” Airborne, Manned Battle

Management

 Wide-Area Ground, Littoral and Maritime Surveillance /

Tracking

 ANG E-8 Unit Provides 100% of the Total Fleet

 ANG C-32 Unit Provides 100% of the Total Fleet

E-8C Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar 

System (JSTARS) - The E-8C JSTARS is the world's

premier wide-area surveillance Moving Target Indicator 

(MTI), airborne, manned Battle Management Command

and Control (BMC2) aircraft. It brings a unique

combination of robust communication and real-time 

surveillance to air, ground, and surface domains. The 

aircraft’s capability to find, fix, track and orient shooters

to air, ground and surface Targets of Interest (TOI)

allows friendly forces to respond rapidly to a changing

battlefield environment.

The Air National Guard (ANG) 116 ACW at Robins AFB, GA is home to 16 E-8Cs and E-8(T)C. 

Team JSTARS is the premier example of Total Force Integration Association. They have

accrued more than 92,000 combat hours and 8,700 combat sorties over Kosovo, Iraq, 

Afghanistan and Libya. In FY13, JSTARS provided 8,800 hours of simultaneous Battle 

Management, Command and Control, and ISR supporting all six Combatant Commanders. As 

an Active Association, there are approximately 750 full-time and 350 traditional ANG personnel 

comprising the 116 ACW (ANG) Host unit, and 1,368 active duty airmen, soldiers and 

Individual Mobilization Augmentees (AFRES) comprising the 461 ACW (active duty) Associate 

unit. Modernization efforts will enhance the warfighting capabilities well into the 21st century

through programs such as the Communication / Network Upgrade, Beyond Line-of-Sight 

Network Architecture Upgrade (BNAU), Multi-Agency Communications Capability (MACC),

and a cross-domain security solution to include multi-theater chat, e-mail and web access.

C-32B - The C-32B provides dedicated

rapid response worldwide airlift through

the Commander, United States Special

Operations Command, in support of the US

Government crisis response activities, both 

domestic and abroad. The 150 SOS of the

New Jersey ANG operates the C-32B from 

Joint Base McGuire, NJ.
56

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

E-8C & C-32B

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

E-8C:

 Global Imagery Server

 Integrated Broadcast Service Modernization

 Integrated Personnel Recovery Compatible Interrogation Radio

 Integrated Automatic Identification System 

 Network Centric Collaborative Targeting 

C-32B:

 Satellite Communications System with Secure Ku Bandwidth

 Communications Management System Replacement

Essential Capabilities List

E-8C:

 Unclassified Network (including Email to Bridge / Relay Defense Support to Civil 

Authorities, Homeland Defense Voice and Data)

 Beyond Line-of-Sight Tactical Data Link Interoperability Multi-Data Link Gateway

 Enhanced Electronic Protection (Global Positioning System) for Navigation and 

Communication Systems

 Self Defense Suite (Airframe)

 Common Data Link with Common Ground Station

C-32B:

 Audio / Video System Replacement

Desired Capabilities List

E-8C:

 Data Link with Net Enabled Weapons

 Electronic Flight Bag 

 Moving Target Indicator / Link-16 / Battle Management Command and Control Deployable 

Ground System Capability

 Three-Dimensional Spatial Audio

 TMSS Modernization

 Common Data Link with Common Ground Station

C-32B:

 None
57

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

E-8C GLOBAL IMAGERY SERVER

1. Background. Imagery is needed onboard E-8C Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar 

System (JSTARS) to allow organic Moving Target Indicator (MTI) to be layered in context with 

known geospatial information (water, land, urban features, and Intelligence, Surveillance and 

Reconnaissance (ISR) products) to support the JSTARS battle management and surveillance 

responsibilities. The layering of information allows operators to better identify, track and predict 

movement for targets of interest. Currently, the JSTARS imagery system provides very limited 

and outdated mission center specific imagery (underlays). Because of the proprietary data 

formats currently used on the JSTARS system, imagery creation and updates require months of 

processing and extensive manpower support. The system was created prior to modern server 

architectures and, as a result, individual imagery disks are needed for each crew station 

(18 stations x 16 aircraft) requiring days of replication. The new imagery server must use 

imagery products in standard / native data formats, be capable of storing and serving worldwide 

imagery data, and be updated rapidly as new imagery products become available. Integration of 

the modern imagery server coupled with low cost, high capacity storage will provide mission 

crews with significantly more accurate and updated image products with higher resolution. In 

addition, the system will drastically reduce support manpower requirements by reducing the 

processing timelines from months to hours, and eliminating the need for disk replication for each 

crew station.

2. Source of Need. JSTARS Operational Requirements Document (USAF 001-84) I/II/II A 

(Rev 5), Dec 2004; 116 ACW Capability Needs List (Imagery Server); 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted. 

4. Program Details. PEC: 27581F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

16 Imagery Servers (3010) $525,000 $8,400,000

5 Training (3840) $320,000 $1,600,000

Total $10,000,000

116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance
58

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

E-8C INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE MODERNIZATION

1. Background. Integrated Broadcast Service (IBS) received via the Commander’s Tactical 

Terminal / Hybrid Receive Only (CTT/H-R) receivers is the primary system used to identify and 

locate threats to the E-8C Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) aircraft. 

To support JSTARS Battle Management responsibility, IBS provides Electronic Intelligence, 

Signals Intelligence and Human Intelligence reports for fusion with JSTARS Moving Target 

Indicator (MTI) to support target nomination and identification tasks. JSTARS CTT/H-R 

receivers are obsolete and do not support Common Message Format, Common Interactive 

Broadcast waveforms and encryption requirements. A replacement is needed to sustain mission 

crew critical threat information and combat identification capabilities. Air Force Tactical 

Receiver System-Ruggedized (AFTRS-R) terminals are fielded as the new Air Force standard 

and fully capable of supporting IBS requirements. This program integrates the AFTRS-R on the 

JSTARS aircraft and provides training and a support infrastructure. 

2. Requirement. JSTARS Operational Requirements Document (USAF 001-84) I/II/II A 

(Rev 5), Dec 2004; 2012 -2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted. 

116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27581F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

16 IBS (3010) $550,000 $8,800,000

3 Training (3840) $400,000 $1,200,000

Total $10,000,000
59

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

E-8C INTEGRATED PERSONNEL RECOVERY COMPATIBLE INTERROGATION 

RADIO

1. Background. The E-8C Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) 

provides overwatch support for Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) of potential hostile 

extraction areas, guides isolated personnel and extraction teams, and provides Command and 

Control (C2) to strike assets in support of extraction operations. JSTARS has a requirement to 

support CSAR operations using a Personnel Recovery (PR) radio capable of communicating with 

isolated personnel. Currently, JSTARS aircrew carry the QuickDraw2 handheld airborne 

interrogator. However, the Combat Survivor Evader Locator (CSEL) is the current US 

Department of Defense program of record for Joint Search and Rescue and replaces the older 

AN/PRC-112G radio. The QuickDraw2 interrogator is not compatible with the CSEL and must 

be upgraded or supplemented to provide a PR system capable of interfacing with both the 

AN/PRC-112G radios and the CSEL. The overall objective of the PR program is to provide lineof-sight text and voice communications with isolated personnel and extraction teams with 

enhanced surveillance, connectivity and security through interoperability with the E-8C via the 

secure PR data links. JSTARS, with an integrated PR capability, provides a persistent airborne 

Command and Control, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C2ISR) node to support 

isolated personnel and extraction teams. 

2. Source of Need. Air Combat Command (ACC) JSTARS Requirements List (CSAR 

Support); 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted. 

116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27581F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

16 PRC Radios (3010) $562,500 $9,000,000

2 Training (3840) $500,000 $1,000,000

Total $10,000,000
60

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

E-8C INTEGRATED AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM

1. Background. The E-8C Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS)

recently expanded its maritime surveillance capabilities via the addition of the Enhanced Land 

Maritime Mode. As a result, JSTARS is receiving more taskings to support real world maritime 

missions. JSTARS requires an organic, integrated capability to provide near real-time 

identification of maritime vessels. The Automatic Identification System (AIS) is the current

recognized system of record for providing this capability. AIS is an automated tracking

system used on ships and Vessel Tracking Services (VTS) for identifying and locating

vessels by electronically exchanging data with other nearby ships and VTS stations. 

Receiving a vessel's identity, position, course and speed greatly enhances a crew's ability to 

distinguish neutral and suspect maritime entities. AIS gives the mission crew the capability 

to focus on suspect vessels and expedite cross cueing of potential targets with external 

agencies. An integrated AIS system which overlays AIS reports on the JSTARS Operator 

Work Station, allows expeditious comparison of organic Moving Target Indicator (MTI) data 

with received AIS transponder returns.

2. Source of Need. JSTARS Operational Requirements Document (USAF 001-84) I/II/II A 

(Rev 5), Dec 2004; 116 ACW Capability Needs List; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Unit Impacted. 

116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27581F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

16 AIS (3010) $210,000 $3,360,000

3 Training (3840) $210,000 $630,000

Total $3,990,000
61

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

E-8C NETWORK CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING

1. Background. Network Centric Collaborative Targeting (NCCT) is a machine-to-machine 

interface between similar and dissimilar Battle Management Command and Control (BMC2) and 

Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) assets. It enables direct sensor 

collaboration between platforms, as well as speeding target detection and reporting with 

increased confidence in target identification and location accuracy. The E-8C Joint Surveillance 

and Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) implementation would reduce kill chain timelines by 

automating cross cueing of Electronic Intelligence (ELINT), Communications Intelligence 

(COMINT), Moving Target Indicator (MTI), Imagery Intelligence (IMINT), Automatic 

Identification System (AIS), and radar sensors. Fusion of JSTARS MTI and off-board sensor 

data (ELINT, COMINT) provides JSTARS high confidence identification and precise target 

location not achieved or resolved by individual platforms or systems. NCCT establishes a peerto-peer ISR network consisting of beyond line-of-sight and line-of-sight communications.

2. Source of Need. JSTARS Operational Requirements Document (USAF 001-84) I/II/II A 

(Rev 5), Dec 2004, contains a requirement for Combat Identification (CID); 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted. 

116 ACW Robins AFB, GA

4. Program Details. PEC: 27581F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

16 NCCT (3010) $235,000 $3,760,000

1 Training (3840) $235,000 $235,000

Total $3,995,000
62

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

C-32B SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH SECURE KU BANDWIDTH

1. Background. The current Satellite Communications (SATCOM) system does not provide 

reliable, sufficient, secure and dedicated bandwidth to meet operationally defined requirements. 

The legacy system relies on a commercially available service consisting of a finite amount of 

bandwidth that is approaching saturation. Additionally, the Chief Information Officer (CIO) of 

the Department of Defense (DOD) declares the system must be replaced. A Ku transmit /

receive capability exists and is fielded on similar aircraft. Installation of SATCOM hardware 

must coincide with availability of secure Ku bandwidth.

2. Source of Need. DOD CIO Memo, “Discontinuation of Legacy Inmarsat Services,” 25 Aug 

2011; US Air Force / National Guard Bureau (NGB) classified Operational Requirements 

Document 001-57 I/II/III, 8 Aug 2002; 2011-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted. 

150 SOS JB McGuire, NJ

4. Program Details. PEC: 1160408BB

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

5 Ku Bandwidth (3840) $14,000,000 $70,000,000

2 Satellite Communication Systems (3010) $1,400,000 $2,800,000

Total $72,800,000
63

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

C-32B COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REPLACEMENT

1. Background. The Communications Management System (CMS) provides the operators a 

means to control mission radios and provides C-32B system access. Without the CMS no 

mission communications, voice or data, enters or leaves the aircraft. The current system is 

nearly a decade old, and multiple modifications have maintained its viability. The life 

expectancy of the current CMS is extremely limited and a replacement should be procured now 

before missions are impacted. The main Line Replacement Unit (LRU) board and operating 

system are no longer available or manufactured. The inability to procure replacement parts 

combined with the spare parts pool for the LRU being depleted necessitates procurement of a 

new system.

2. Source of Need. US Air Force / National Guard Bureau (NGB) classified Operational 

Requirements Document (ORD) 001-57 I/II/III, 8 Aug 2002; 2011-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

150 SOS JB McGuire, NJ

4. Program Details. PEC: 1160408BB

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 CMS Replacement (3010) $4,500,000 $4,500,000

Total $4,500,000
64

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
65

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

E-8C 

&

C-32B TA

B

F

F-15 - The Air National Guard (ANG) possesses over 40 percent of 

the Combat Air Forces (CAF) Air Dominance capability. These units 

also provide 37 percent of the nation’s Aerospace Control Alert (ACA)

assets ensuring 24-hour Homeland Defense (HD). The introduction of 

the Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar on ANG 

F-15Cs provides the Combatant Commander with vital HD capability.

Operating six of nine combat-coded F-15C squadrons, the ANG 

possesses the majority of the air superiority assets available for Air 

Expeditionary Force (AEF) commitments. Additionally, the ANG 

operates the only F-15 flying training unit at the 173 FW, Klamath 

Falls IAP, OR and trains all F-15C pilots. 

ANG F-15 modernization programs are necessary to improve this 

combat-proven fighter’s capabilities for both HD and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). 

These programs include the APG-63(v)3 AESA radar, air dominance enabler, a modernized selfprotection suite, multi-spectral search / target / track system and a modernized cockpit. 

Accomplishing these upgrades provides a dramatic increase in persistent, lethal air superiority 

available to Combatant Commanders.

F-22 - The ANG has two F-22 classic associate units at JB Langley-Eustis, VA and Tyndall 

AFB, FL. The Hawaii ANG has the first operational ANG F-22 squadron at Hickam AFB, 

providing ACA support for the Hawaiian Islands and enabling Air Dominance in the Pacific. 

F-22 modernization efforts include incorporation of a helmet-mounted display and federated 

processors. Communication upgrades, including fourth / fifth and fifth / fifth generation data

link, provide the F-22 with an efficient method to address 

HD and OCO missions.

 Air Dominance

 Homeland Defense

 ANG F-15 Units Provide 52% of the Total Fleet

 ANG F-22 Units Provide 11% of the Total Fleet

F-15 & F-22

F-15 & 

F-22 TAB G
66

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

F-15 & F-22

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

F-15:

 Active Electronically Scanned Array Radar

 Persistent Air Dominance Enabler

 Modernized Cockpit

 Multi-Spectral Search / Target / Track System

 Modernized Self-Protection Suite

F-22:

 Helmet-Mounted Display

 Survivability Enhancements

 Communications Upgrade (Broadband, Beyond Line-of-Sight Communications, Fourth / 

Fifth Generation and Fifth / Fifth Generation Data Link)

 Federated Processors

 Multi-Spectral Sensor Capabilities

Essential Capabilities List

F-15:

 External Missile Launcher

 High Fidelity Networked Simulators at Air National Guard Bases

 Offensive Electronic Attack

 Organic US Government Owned F-15 Operational Flight Program

 Joint Mission Planning System / Common Mission Debrief Program Support System

F-22:

 None

Desired Capabilities List

F-15:

 Realistic Training Opportunities

 Air Launched Hit-to-Kill

 Next Generation Weapon

F-22:

 None
67

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

F-15 ACTIVE ELECTRONICALLY SCANNED ARRAY RADAR

1. Background. Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) technology exponentially 

increases detection and track ranges of airborne targets and greatly improves identification 

capability. AESA radar gives the F-15C true multi-target track and attack capability, and vastly 

increases capabilities against advanced Electronic Attack (EA) from enemy systems. AESA 

radars are critical for Homeland Defense (HD) missions because the system enables pilots to 

locate a Target of Interest (TOI) in a saturated air traffic environment, or detect and track small, 

asymmetric threats. AESA radars also eliminate the hydraulic and electrical systems associated 

with mechanically operated radars such as the APG-63(v)0, resulting in dramatically improved 

reliability and maintainability. The APG-63(v)0 is 1970s technology and unable to keep pace 

with current and postulated threats. Additionally, the Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) for 

the (v)0 is 10-12 hours of flight time, while the MTBF for an AESA radar is over 30 times 

greater. To date, Congressional appropriations have purchased at least 48 AESA radars for the 

Air National Guard (ANG). However, ANG F-15C units continue to operate the only combatcoded APG-63(v)0 radar systems in the Combat Air Forces (CAF) and are not currently planned 

for conversion to AESA. The Department of Defense’s (DOD) strategic pivot to the Pacific has 

adjusted the ANG requirement for F-15C AESA radars in order to effectively support Combatant 

Commands and preserve the commitment to HD. The ANG requirement has been modified to 

account for the combat-coded (v)0 ANG aircraft that are not currently scheduled to receive an 

AESA upgrade. Further, the amendment allows each operational ANG unit to provide AESAequipped F-15Cs for worldwide deployment while simultaneously providing 24/7 HD at 

Aerospace Control Alert (ACA) locations. Finally, the AESA is required to create the physical 

space needed for installation of Advanced Data Core Processor (ADCP) II, which is the 

foundation of fleet commonality.

2. Source of Need. F-15C/D Radar Improvement Program; APG-63(v)3 Capability 

Development Document (CDD), 21 Apr 2005; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

104 FW Westfield-Barnes RAP, MA 142 FW Portland IAP, OR 159 FW JRB New Orleans, LA

120 FW Great Falls IAP, MT 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 173 FW Klamath Falls AP, OR

125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL

4. Program Details. PEC: 27130F

 Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

23 APG-63(v)0 AESA Conversions (3010) $9,500,000 $218,500,000

Total $218,500,000

* Includes installation, spares and program costs. 

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack
68

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

F-15 PERSISTENT AIR DOMINANCE ENABLER

1. Background. Adding Conformal Fuel Tanks (CFTs) and an updated non-cooperative target 

identification capability to the F-15C/D provides the single greatest impact to combat operations 

planning for air dominance through 2040. These modifications are vital elements of the Air 

Component Commander’s ability to deliver persistent, lethal air superiority. CFTs, coupled with 

advanced weapons and updated electronic countermeasures, enable one formation of combatconfigured F-15s to provide nearly twice the normal duration of coverage in contested 

environments without the need for air refueling support. CFTs also streamline weapons 

development and integration for all versions of F-15 through standardized weapons 

communication, thereby enabling the Air Force to exploit rapid evolutions in weapons 

development throughout the F-15 fleet. Combatant Commands can quickly exploit the 

advantages of a common F-15 fleet if all aircraft readily accommodate advanced weapons or offthe-shelf defensive countermeasure upgrades, such as a pylon-mounted fiber-optic towed decoy. 

No other fighter aircraft in the US inventory can deliver the same capability and mix of lethality 

at significant combat range without an extensive support bridge. With an aging air refueling 

fleet, anti-access / area denial challenges, and a decreasing number of air dominance platforms, 

the Air National Guard (ANG) must enable persistent air dominance using the F-15C/D. 

2. Source of Need. F-15C/D Operational Requirements Document (ORD), 7 Apr 1992; LF10-

054 Revision A Tasking; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

104 FW Westfield-Barnes RAP, MA 142 FW Portland IAP, OR 159 FW JRB New Orleans, LA

125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 173 FW Klamath Falls AP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 27130F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

105 F-15 Conformal Fuel Tanks (3010) $2,200,000 $231,000,000

Total $231,000,000

* Includes required spares, support equipment and technical orders.
69

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

F-15 MODERNIZED COCKPIT

1. Background. The current displays and communication / navigation functionality in the F-15 

cockpit were designed based on the amount of information accessible by the pilot in the 1970s. 

The F-15 fleet has experienced an exponential growth in capability and lethality in its 30+ years 

of combat-proven service due to the modernization of radars, weapons, sensors and data links. 

Fully utilizing these enhancements requires a complex pilot interface. The current legacy 

displays and communication architecture are incapable of properly presenting this information 

due to display size, outdated technology and minimalist audio integration. Replacement of 

legacy displays with larger color and/or smart color display systems increases the lethality of Air 

National Guard (ANG) F-15s by more intuitively processing and displaying data. The addition 

of three-dimensional (3-D) audio separation allows the pilot to rapidly interpret complex data 

based on proper scientific understanding of the Pilot-to-Vehicle Interface (PVI). Further, these 

capabilities allow the pilot to make full operational use of current and planned aircraft 

capabilities. Based on the proposed Air Force F-15 modernization schedule, new displays and 

3-D audio are the most effective means available for the ANG to bridge current system 

limitations and provide a solid platform as new capabilities are realized.

2. Source of Need. F-15C/D Operational Requirements Document (ORD), 7 Apr 1992; 2013 

ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

104 FW Westfield-Barnes RAP, MA 142 FW Portland IAP, OR 159 FW JRB New Orleans, LA

120 FW Great Falls IAP, MT 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 173 FW Klamath Falls AP, OR

125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL

4. Program Details. PEC: 27130F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost 

130 F-15 Vertical Situation Display Upgrades

(3010) $20,000 $2,600,000

105 F-15 3-D Audio (3010) $60,000 $6,300,000

Total $8,900,000

* Assumes installation, program costs and 10% spares.
70

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

F-15 MULTI-SPECTRAL SEARCH / TARGET / TRACK SYSTEM

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) F-15s are tasked for threat areas throughout the 

world as part of the Air and Space Expeditionary Force (AEF) while defending the homeland. A 

multi-spectral search / target / track system exploits a target’s signature across the 

electromagnetic spectrum. Current adversary aircraft and air defense networks employ 

sophisticated detection and Electronic Attack (EA) methods that degrade system performance

and make allied aircraft vulnerable to attack. Multi-spectral search / target / track systems 

provide alternatives not susceptible to EA or other advanced radar countermeasures. These 

systems must be able to detect, identify and track threats to friendly aircraft as a timesynchronized, integrated function of the existing sensor systems for detection and weapons 

cueing. It is not a capability employed in lieu of Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA)

radars or as a stand-alone infrared search and track function, but rather a part of the integrated 

fire-control system that dramatically increases probability of threat detection. Further, the multispectral system must be coordinated with radar warning to provide robust threat alerts to friendly 

aircraft. Multi-spectral search / target / track systems are a revolutionary capability essential to 

air dominance and a critical enabler for integrated fourth-fifth generation fighter operations, 

ballistic missile detection and asymmetric threat defense.

2. Source of Need. F/A-18 Infrared Search-and-Track System Capability Development 

Document (CDD), Mar 2011, US Air Force Annex; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

104 FW Westfield-Barnes RAP, MA 142 FW Portland IAP, OR 159 FW JRB New Orleans, LA

120 FW Great Falls IAP, MT 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 173 FW Klamath Falls AP, OR

125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL

4. Program Details. PEC: 27130F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

50 Multi-Spectral Systems (3010) $3,500,000 $175,000,000

105 ALQ-128 (3010) $450,000 $47,250,000

Total $222,250,000

* Assumes Full Rate Production.
71

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

F-15 MODERNIZED SELF-PROTECTION SUITE

1. Background. The existing F-15C/D Electronic Warfare (EW) internal self-protection suite is 

comprised of 1980s era EW equipment and is incapable of providing adequate defensive 

situational awareness and countermeasures against present and future radar systems. The Air 

Force documented these shortfalls in a Capability Development Document (CDD) entitled Eagle 

Passive Active Warning Survivability System (EPAWSS) and initiated funding in Fiscal Year 

2013 in concert with the removal of sustainment funding for the existing EW suite. A robust 

integrated Electronic Attack (EA) suite is required to enable the F-15 to counter current and 

future radars, to include enemy fighters. The attributes of this integrated suite shall incorporate a 

digital Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), a Digital Radio Frequency Memory (DRFM) jammer, 

the ALE-58 BOL, and integration with the replacement for the ALQ-128. While the AF plans to 

begin fielding EPAWSS on the F-15C in Fiscal Year 2018, the expected fielding date for ANG 

F-15C/D aircraft is much later, requiring the fielding of an interim “gap filler” system.

2. Source of Need. Tactical Air Forces (TAF) 304-80-I/II/III-C System Operational 

Requirements Document (ORD) for the F-15A-D Tactical Electronic Warfare Suite, 7 Apr 1992;

EPAWSS Capability Development Document (CDD), Jun 2007; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC 

Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

104 FW Westfield-Barnes RAP, MA 142 FW Portland IAP, OR 159 FW JRB New Orleans, LA

120 FW Great Falls IAP, MT 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 173 FW Klamath Falls AP, OR

125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL

4. Program Details. PEC: 27130F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost 

105 EPAWSS (3010) $6,600,000 $693,000,000

1 F-15 Towed Decoy NRE (3600) $5,500,000 $5,500,000

50 F-15 Towed Decoys (3010) $2,500,000 $125,000,000

120 BOL-IR (3010) $90,000 $10,800,000

Total $834,300,000

* Includes required spares, support equipment and technical orders.
72

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
73

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air National Guard (ANG) F-16s directly support 

and have proven critical to the success of 

contingencies around the globe including Operations 

NOBLE EAGLE (ONE), IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF), 

ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF), and NEW DAWN 

(OND); and Homeland Defense (HD) scrambles. 

Since 2003, ANG F-16Cs have fulfilled over 

30 percent of Air Force Central Command 

(AFCENT) Precision Guided Munitions (PGM) and 

Close Air Support (CAS) taskings, including convoy 

escort, dedicated infrastructure defense, border patrol 

and raid support. 

The ANG operates 341 Block 25/30/32/40/42/50/52 F-16C/Ds. Block 25/30/32 aircraft

equipped with Situational Awareness Data Link (SADL) and Block 40/42/50/52 aircraft outfitted 

with Link-16 provide tremendous capability across the operational theaters. Planned

enhancements to the Block 40/42 and Block 50/52 aircraft will make them more capable for 

advanced mission sets.

Modernization efforts for ANG F-16s focus on fielding affordable systems with all-weather 

targeting capability, secure line-of-sight (SLOS) and beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) 

communication suites, smart displays with data processing capability, advanced helmet mounted 

target cueing for air and ground weapons employment, enhanced self-protection suites, and 

improved radar performance and reliability.

 Close Air Support / Interdiction/ Precision Strike

 Suppression / Destruction of Enemy Air Defenses

 Air Superiority for Homeland Defense

 ANG F-16 Units Provide 37% of the Total Fleet

F-16

F-16 TAB H
74

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

F-16

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

 All Weather Air-to-Ground Self-Targeting and High Quality Coordinate Generation

 Integrated Self-Protection and Threat Detection Suite

 Continued Targeting Pod Spiral Development, High Definition in Cockpit Display and 

Broadband Uplink

 Secure Line-of-Sight and Beyond Line-of-Sight with Three-Dimensional Audio 

Communications

 Day / Night Compatible Helmet Mounted Integrated Targeting

 APG-68 Radar Enhancements

Essential Capabilities List

 Incremental Development of Targeting Pod Data Link Supporting Two-Way Encrypted 

Video Downlink

 Increased Jam Resistance In Embedded Global Positioning System Inertial Navigation

 Auto Ground Collision Avoidance System

 Drag chute

 Ventral Fin Antenna Set - Frequency Modulation Antenna improvement

 Proliferation and Sustainment of Concurrent High Fidelity Ready Aircrew Proficiency 

Quality Simulators

 Incorporate Live-Virtual-Constructive Technology into Current Systems

 Increased Smart Weapon Payload Capacity

Desired Capabilities List

 Capability to Interpret and Display Currently Non-Compatible Data Link Information

 Color Video from the Targeting Pod

 Ability to Fly Global Positioning System Instrument Approaches

 Extended Range Fuel Configuration Options

 Increased Digital Video Recorder Capabilities 
75

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

F-16 ALL WEATHER AIR-TO-GROUND SELF-TARGETING AND HIGH QUALITY 

COORDINATE GENERATION

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) F-16 Block 30/40/42/50/52 aircraft require the 

ability to self-generate high quality, targetable coordinates in all weather conditions. Synthetic 

Aperture Radars (SAR) can generate images of high enough quality to achieve targetable 

coordinates. Any system must include the ability to derive high quality, targetable coordinates 

from ranges far enough away to avoid modern tactical Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAMs) and/or 

reduce noise footprint to enemy combatants. The system’s ability to generate large SAR maps is 

necessary to engage surface targets and perform the full spectrum of combat capabilities in poor 

weather conditions, amplifying the strike capability of Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses 

(SEAD), Destruction of Enemy Air Defenses (DEAD), Air Interdiction (AI) and Close Air 

Support (CAS) missions. 

2. Source of Need. Tactical Air Forces (TAF) 303-76-I/II/III-A System Original Requirements 

Document (SORD) for the F-16C/D; Combat Air Forces (CAF) Operational Requirements 

Document (ORD) 303-76-I/II/III-D F-16C/D Multi-Stage Improvement Program (MSIP),

14 Aug 2000; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

113 WG JB Andrews, MD 149 FW Duluth, MN 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ

115 FW Truax Field, WI 158 FW Burlington, VT 180 FW Toledo, OH

138 FW Tulsa, OK 162 FW Tucson, AZ 187 FW Dannelly Field, AL

140 WG Buckley, CO 169 FW Eastover, SC

4. Program Details. PEC: 27133F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 APG-68 NRE (3600) $20,000,000 $20,000,000

178 APG-68 Upgrades (3010) $670,000 $119,260,000

Total $139,260,000
76

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

F-16 INTEGRATED SELF-PROTECTION AND THREAT DETECTION SUITE

1. Background. The current F-16 Block 30/32/40/42/50/52 Electronic Warfare (EW) suite is 

comprised of EW equipment designed in the 1980s. The defensive systems suffer from 

sustainment issues and have significant limitations against many modern threat systems. A 

robust, integrated Electronic Attack (EA) suite will enable all F-16 blocks to counter current and 

future radars. The new EW suite should incorporate an upgraded Radar Warning Receiver 

(RWR), Digital Radio Frequency Memory (DRFM) EA pod, pylon Missile Warning System 

(MWS), and the ALQ-213 Electronic Combat (EC) integration system. The F-16 fleet has two 

legacy analog RWRs (ALR-69 and ALR-56M) and two legacy analog EA pods (ALQ-131 and 

ALQ-184). All require sustainment as well as digital-based performance upgrades. The 

ALQ-213 EC integration system is installed on all F-16 pre-blocks, but must be installed on all 

F-16 high-blocks. 

2. Source of Need. AN/ALR-69A Capability Production Document (CPD), 17 Nov 2005;

Combat Air Forces (CAF) 301-01-B Operational Requirements Document (ORD); F-16 C/D 

Block 25/30/32 Multi-Stage Improvement Program (MSIP) ORD, 15 Dec 2004; CAF 303-76-

I/II/III-D; F-16C/D MSIP ORD, 14 Aug 2000; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

113 WG JB Andrews, MD 149 FW Duluth, MN 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ

115 FW Truax Field, WI 158 FW Burlington, VT 180 FW Toledo, OH

138 FW Tulsa, OK 162 FW Tucson, AZ 187 FW Dannelly Field, AL

140 WG Buckley, CO 169 FW Eastover, SC

4. Program Details. PEC: 27133F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost * Program Cost

141 ALQ-213 (3010) $160,000 $22,560,000

1 RWR NRE (3600) $15,000,000 $15,000,000

260 RWR Systems (3010) $700,000 $182,000,000

1 ALQ-213 NRE (3600) $28,000,000 $28,000,000

1 MWS with 3-D Ground Support Equipment

(3080)

$4,120,000 $4,120,000

150 MWS with 3-D Audio (3010) $1,330,000 $199,500,000

Total $451,180,000

* Includes 10% spares.
77

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

F-16 CONTINUED TARGETING POD SPIRAL DEVELOPMENT HIGH DEFINITION 

IN COCKPIT DISPLAY AND BROADBAND UPLINK

1. Background. Procurement of Advanced Targeting Pods (ATP) has been an Air National 

Guard (ANG) top priority for several years. LITENING and SNIPER are multi-sensor systems 

that enhance all F-16 mission taskings to include Aerospace Control Alert (ACA) operations. 

Modernization with fourth generation capability, including 1K FLIR, 1K CCD, Laser Target 

Image Processing and broadband digital video downlinks, vastly improves day and night target 

acquisition at extended ranges in both air-to-ground and air-to-air roles. The ANG requires 

continuing spiral upgrades to fourth generation capability on all ATPs. ATP digital port 

connections allow direct display of high quality targeting pod video on the F-16 Center Display 

Unit. This provides un-matched high quality imagery display, greatly enhancing the capability 

of the pilot to identify and engage the enemy in the current and future fight. 

2. Source of Need. Combatant Commander Urgent Need Request (UNR), Nov 2004; 2013 

ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

113 WG JB Andrews, MD 140 WG Buckley, CO 169 FW McEntire JNGS, SC

114 FW Sioux Falls, SD 148 FW Duluth, MN 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ

115 FW Truax Field, WI 149 FW Lackland AFB, TX 180 FW Toledo, OH

132 FW Des Moines, IA 158 FW South Burlington, VT 187 FW Dannelly Field, AL

138 FW Tulsa, OK 162 FW Tucson, AZ

4. Program Details. PEC: 27133F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

20 ATP-SE Pods (3010) $1,700,000 $34,000,000

259 Color Display Kits (3010) $183,764 $47,594,876

33 4th Gen Upgrades (3010) $1,500,000 $49,500,000

259 IBS Receiver Kits (3010) $176,061 $45,599,799

1 Broadband NRE (3600) $10,000,000 $10,000,000

25 Broadband Systems (3010) $1,000,000 $25,000,000

Total $211,694,675
78

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

F-16 SECURE LINE-OF-SIGHT AND BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT WITH THREEDIMENSIONAL AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS

1. Background. Current upgrades to F-16s provide secure line-of-sight (SLOS) and improved 

beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) communications through the installation of one ARC-210 radio. 

The ARC-210 modification provides an improved ability to securely communicate with ground 

and Command and Control (C2) forces, but does not allow simultaneous operations on 

SLOS/BLOS frequencies. Homeland Defense (HD) and in-theater operations require

simultaneous SLOS/BLOS communications to concurrently maintain contact with both C2 and 

friendly forces. A second ARC-210 permits growth to extended data and image transfer when 

linked to an advanced display. The combination of two ARC-210s plus a legacy radio allows 

simultaneous in-theater communications on a C2 frequency, a secure tactical frequency with 

ground forces, and an intra-flight frequency. In the HD mission, this radio configuration enables 

monitoring C2, air traffic control and intra-flight frequencies. The integration of noise 

cancelling and three-dimensional audio clarifies interpretation of simultaneous radio calls by 

spatially separating aural warning and radio signals. These capabilities are critical to operations 

in remote areas, dense threat environments, and dynamic HD missions.

2. Source of Need. Combat Air Forces (CAF) Operational Requirements Document ORD 303-

76-I/II/III-D; F-16C/D Multi-Stage Improvement Program (MSIP) ORD, 14 Aug 2000; Central 

Command (CENTCOM) Urgent Operational Need (UON); Northern Command (NORTHCOM)

Integrated Priority List; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

113 WG JB Andrews, MD 140 WG Buckley, CO 162 FW Tucson, AZ

114 FW Sioux Falls, SD 148 FW Duluth, MN 169 FW McEntire JNGS, SC

115 FW Truax Field, WI 149 FW Lackland AFB, TX 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ

138 FW Tulsa, OK 158 FW Burlington, VT 187 FW Dannelly Field, AL

4. Program Details. PEC: 27133F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

259 ARC-210 Radio Kits (3010) $150,000 $38,850,000

1 Directional Audio NRE (3600) $5,200,000 $5,200,000

259 Directional Kits (3010) $45,000 $11,655,000

311 Group C Kits (3010) $6,700 $2,083,700

10 Unit Test Equipment (3080) $43,800 $438,000

Total $58,226,700

* Includes 10% spares.
79

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

F-16 DAY / NIGHT COMPATIBLE HELMET MOUNTED INTEGRATED 

TARGETING

1. Background. SCORPION Helmet Mounted Integrated Targeting (HMIT) dramatically 

reduces target acquisition with aircraft sensors from minutes to seconds. Currently, pilots 

typically acquire targets by pointing the aircraft at the target to place it within the heads-up 

display field of view. This is time consuming and often drives the aircraft closer to a threat. 

SCORPION performs precise, head-steered weapons and sensor cueing, thereby enabling pilots 

to fly parallel to targets and maximize standoff distance, thus improving survivability. 

Additionally, SCORPION’s high resolution color display enables constant updates of adversary 

and friendly positions, without the need to perform a heads-down scan across the cockpit, further 

improving survivability. The HMIT system is compatible with existing AN/AVS-9 Night Vision 

Goggles (NVG) and fully supports night operations. Air National Guard (ANG) F-16 

Block 40/42/50/52 aircraft are equipped with the day-only Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System 

(JHMCS), so HMIT would provide NVG-compatible night cueing without the need to modify 

existing JHMCS wiring.

2. Source of Need. JHMCS Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Combat Air Forces

(CAF)-US Navy 308-93-II-A, Dec 1996; CAF ORD 301-01-B; F-16C/D Block 25/30/32 MultiStage Improvement Program (MSIP) ORD, 15 Dec 2004; Central Command (CENTCOM)

Urgent Operational Need (UON); 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted

113 WG JB Andrews, MD 148 FW Duluth, MN 169 FW McEntire JNGS, SC

114 FW Sioux Falls, SD 149 FW Lackland AFB, TX 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ

115 FW Truax Field, WI 158 FW Burlington, VT 180 FW Toledo, OH

138 FW Tulsa, OK 162 FW Tucson, AZ 187 FW Dannelly Field, AL

140 WG Buckley, CO

4. Program Details. PEC: 27133F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost 

166 HMIT Kits (3010) $122,451 $20,326,866

129 JHMCS Night Kits (3010) $240,000 $30,960,000

Total $51,286,866

* Includes 10% spares.
80

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air Superiority / Global Precision Attack

F-16 APG-68 RADAR ENHANCEMENTS 

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) F-16 Block 30/32/40/42 aircraft require updated 

components to enhance the legacy APG-68 radar. Capabilities include increased airborne threat 

detection ranges, improved electronic attack and protection, enhanced capability against low 

radar cross section targets, improved ability to ground-map surface targets, and lowered 

sustainment costs than the current APG-68. This upgrade provides the capability to detect, track 

and eliminate multiple airborne threats, allowing pilots to locate targets of interest in the dense 

air traffic environments prevalent around major population centers, a critical capability for 

Aerospace Control Alert. The system’s ability to generate radar maps is necessary to engage 

surface targets and perform the full spectrum of combat capabilities in poor weather conditions, 

amplifying the strike capability of Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses / Destruction of Enemy 

Air Defenses (SEAD/DEAD) missions. New and enhanced radar components should 

dramatically improve reliability, maintenance and sustainment costs. 

2. Source of Need. Tactical Air Forces (TAF) 303-76-I/II/III-A System Operational 

Requirements Document (SORD) for the F-16C/D; Combat Air Forces (CAF) Operational 

Requirements Document (ORD) 303-76-I/II/III-D; F-16C/D Multi-Stage Improvement Program 

(MSIP) ORD, 14 Aug 2000; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

113 WG JB Andrews, MD 140 WG Buckley, CO 177 FW Atlantic City IAP, NJ

115 FW Truax Field, WI 158 FW Burlington, VT 180 FW Toledo, OH

138 FW Tulsa, OK 162 FW Tucson, AZ 187 FW Dannelly Field, AL

4. Program Details. PEC: 27133F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 APG-68 NRE (3600) $20,000,000 $20,000,000

178 APG-68 Upgrades (3010) $670,000 $119,260,000

Total $139,260,000
81

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

HH-60

Air National Guard (ANG) Personnel Recovery (PR) 

helicopters and crews play a critical and highly involved role in 

support of Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) while also 

responding to increasingly high demand for Domestic 

Operations (DOMOPS). These ANG PR helicopters and 

crews are based in Alaska, California, New Mexico and New 

York.

In Fiscal Year 2013, the 129 RQS continued to provide civil search and rescue capabilities to the 

state of California and flew numerous aerial firefighting missions. They also supported 

Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF). The 210 RQS held a 24-hour, state-wide, rescue 

alert in Alaska resulting in 88 missions and 83 lives saved; and 

executed 36 missions with 35 lives saved or assisted in 

support of OEF. The 101 RQS from New York deployed to 

OEF and accounted for over 100 saves, while simultaneously 

supporting DOMOPS during Hurricane Sandy. The 188 RQS 

is a classic associate unit in New Mexico that maintains 

readiness to respond to domestic disasters and provides 

training to produce mission ready aircrew.

In Fiscal Year 2013, the Air Force continued modernization programs for the HH-60 to include 

the Aircraft Gun Unit (GAU-21) and the PEDROS high fidelity simulator. ANG modernization

programs expected to continue are the Avionics Communication Suite Upgrade (ACSU)

program, the Smart Multi-Function Display program, and completion of the AN/ARS v12 

Personnel Locator System. The ANG intends to pursue modernization programs such as Blue 

Force Tracker and improved defensive equipment to include a hostile fire detector.

 Personnel Recovery

 ANG HH-60 Units Provide 18% of the Total Fleet



HH-60 TAB I
82

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

HH-60 

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

 Advanced Electronic Warfare Penetrator Suite

 Modernized Defensive Systems Suite

 Integrated Flight Deck 

 Helmet Mounted Cueing Situational Awareness

 Crew Served Aircraft Weapons Modernization

Essential Capabilities List

 Distributed Mission Operations Capable HH-60 Aircraft Simulator

 Overwater Mission Survivability Equipment 

 Improved Ballistic Protection 

 Federal Aviation Administration Global Positioning System Certified Aircraft

 Wireless Intercom

Desired Capabilities List

 Identification Friend or Foe Mode 5/S

 Improved Aircraft Generators

 Aircrew Flight Equipment Enhancements

 Electronic Flight Bag

 Instrumentation Upgrade
83

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

HH-60 ADVANCED ELECTRONIC WARFARE PENETRATOR SUITE

1. Background. HH-60 crews are expected to operate in advanced Radio Frequency (RF) threat 

environments. The HH-60 has limited defensive systems when recovering isolated personnel. 

The APR-39Bv2 presently installed on the HH-60 is an analog system with limited processing 

capability. The system is not capable of displaying RF threats without ambiguity and therefore 

puts the aircrew in vulnerable situations. HH-60 crews must operate in RF threat engagement 

zones to recover personnel and require advanced detection systems to alert the crew of hostile 

threats. An integrated RF jammer that inhibits the ability to engage the aircraft is needed to 

ensure survivability of the crew. 

2. Sources of Need. Lessons Learned from current operations, Personnel Recovery (PR)

Operations Plan (OPLAN) and Contingency Plan (CONPLAN); PR Core Function Master Plan, 

2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Field, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53114F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

17 RF Jammers (3010) $5,000,000 $85,000,000

1 RF Jammer NRE (3600) $5,000,000 $5,000,000

1 Radar Warning Receiver NRE (3600) $2,000,000 $2,000,000

17 Radar Warning Receivers (3010) $1,240,000 $21,080,000

3 Unit Test Equipment (3080) $58,400 $175,200

Total $113,255,200
84

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

HH-60 MODERNIZED DEFENSIVE SYSTEM SUITE

1. Background. The HH-60 requires a precise, integrated defensive system that detects and 

displays current threat systems such as small arms fire, Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPGs), and 

Man-Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) with visual and audio indications. The current 

method employed to detect RPGs and small arms fire is visual detection or radio notification 

from a ground party which does not provide crews the required time to react and defeat enemy 

threats. Three-dimensional (3-D) audio equipment is required to integrate the audio warnings 

from a Missile Warning System, Hostile Fire Indicator, and Radar Warning Receiver, with

communication and mission equipment. Three-dimensional audio equipment enables crews to 

rapidly return precise and immediate defensive fire, effectively suppressing or destroying the 

enemy threat. Crews also require training software integrated into the Electronic Warfare (EW)

Suite in order to effectively train for combat scenarios.

2. Sources of Need. Lessons Learned from current operations Personnel Recovery (PR)

Operations Plan (OPLAN) and Contingency Plan (CONPLAN); PR Core Function Master Plan;

AF Form 1067 Air Combat Command (ACC) 10-252; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Field, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53114F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

108 3-D Audio Kits (3010) $7,000 $756,000

17 Hostile Fire Indicators (3010) $270,000 $4,590,000

1 Defensive System NRE (3600) $2,000,000 $2,000,000

1 Directional Audio NRE (3600) $6,000,000 $6,000,000

3 Unit Test Equipment (3010) $58,400 $175,200

17 ALQ-213 with 3-D Audio Kits (3010) $234,000 $3,978,000

Total $17,499,200
85

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

HH-60 INTEGRATED FLIGHT DECK

1. Background. Current military and domestic operations require HH-60 crews to process 

fragmented and dissimilar information presented by various legacy systems to rapidly formulate 

courses of action in dynamic and time sensitive threat environments. Full Motion Video (FMV) 

capability will allow critical visual Drop Zone and Landing Zone data to be received from 

Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) assets before dangerous insertion and 

extraction operations. To reduce crew workload and enhance mission effectiveness, the current 

Smart Multi-Function Color Display installed on Air National Guard (ANG) HH-60s must be 

fully integrated with the Situational Awareness Data Link (SADL), Lightweight Airborne 

Recovery System (LARS) Version 12, and the Air Force Tactical Receiver Segment-Ruggedized 

(AFTRS-R). The capability to quickly access mission essential data from one centralized display 

will enable HH-60 aircrews to reduce “heads down” time and vastly improve situational 

awareness. Secure Internet Protocol (SIP) data will enable aircrews to receive near real-time

Blue Force Tracker (BFT) data and text messaging from the battlefield. BFT is a modernized 

joint tracking system which is cooperative with SADL and Link-16 and provides beyond line-ofsight (BLOS) interactive data communication between aviation assets and Command and 

Control. A secure-capable, multi-spectrum radio capable of supporting Solider Radio Waveform 

(SRW) assures military and civil command authorities that rescue helicopters will be ready for 

any and all relief operations. This also increases the Combat Search and Rescue capability by 

filling an existing secure radio shortfall. 

2. Sources of Need. Lessons Learned from current operations, Personnel Recovery Operations 

Plan (OPLAN) and Contingency Plan (CONPLAN), and Defense Support to Civil Authorities

necessitate the requirement for line-of-sight and BLOS situational awareness and modernized 

communications management; AF Forms 1067 Air Combat Command (ACC) 04-043, 05-078, 

09-153 and 10-229; Combat Air Forces (CAF) Urgent Operational Need (UON) 306-09; 2012-

2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53114F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 AFTRS-R Installation (3010) $2,500,000 $2,500,000

18 Blue Force Trackers (3010) $100,000 $1,800,000

18 Full Motion Video (3010) $200,000 $3,600,000

Total $7,900,000
86

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

HH-60 HELMET MOUNTED CUEING SITUATIONAL AWARENESS

1. Background. The addition of day and night helmet mounted cueing and display capability in 

the HH-60 significantly increases aircrew Situational Awareness (SA) and weapons employment 

capability, enhances terminal area search and rescue operations, and speeds overall internal 

communication during critical mission phases. A Helmet Mounted Cueing System (HMCS) 

allows all crewmembers to quickly build SA with minimal need for voice communication. 

Sensor and data link symbols are visible on the helmet mounted display superimposed over the 

geographic location of friendly, hostile and survivor positions. Additionally, the ability to 

display sensor pictures and data link information while maintaining a heads-up posture will 

greatly enhance safety while flying in the low-level (<500 ft) environment. Since the majority of 

the HH-60 mission employment occurs at night, this capability must be compatible with Night 

Vision Goggles. Three-dimensional (3-D) Landing Zone (LZ) symbology integrated into a 

HMCS provides crews with sufficient situational awareness to maneuver the aircraft in reduced 

visibility conditions. 

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 Air Combat Command (ACC) 09-258; Lessons Learned 

from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) and IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF); 2012-2013 

ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53114F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

18 3-D Landing Zone Kits (3010) $1,000,000 $18,000,000

1 3-D Landing Zone NRE (3600) $10,000,000 $10,000,000

18 HMCS Aircraft Kits (3010) $335,294 $6,035,292

102 HMCS Helmet Kits (3010) $87,843 $8,959,986

1 HMCS NRE (3600) $6,000,000 $6,000,000

102 Night Vision Units (3010) $65,882 $6,719,964

Total $55,715,242
87

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

HH-60 CREW SERVED AIRCRAFT WEAPONS MODERNIZATION

1. Background. The HH-60 has a requirement to provide reliable defensive firepower to 

support various combat mission operations. Currently fielded are the GAU-2B and the GAU-18 

weapons systems. The GAU-21 .50-caliber machine gun is scheduled to replace the GAU-18 

weapon system. It is an accurate, reliable, lightweight, high rate of fire, open-bolt weapon that 

effectively suppresses threats out to a distance of 1,500 meters. The GAU-2B (7.62 mm) 

weapon system allows aircrews the ability to continue operating with a reliable defensive 

capability but at a lower mission weight, since the HH-60 routinely operates at maximum 

allowable gross weight. The M134D mini-gun is a GAU-2B weapon system that, once updated 

with the improved weapon components, will provide overall weight savings and bring the 

weapon system to an up-to-date capability. Improved weapons components include an 

ergonomic designed grip, safing sector housing cover, 3,000-round firing trigger, direct current 

drive motor with battery and cable set, low-drag ammo feed chute, rigid expended brass link 

chute, and a barrel clamp safety retainer. Currently, the system relies on an electronic control 

unit and aircraft power to operate. In the event an aircraft must land in an austere environment 

and loses aircraft power, there is no capability to fire the weapon for aircrew self-defense. 

2. Source of Need. Air Combat Command (ACC) Project 96-012A HH-60G Cabin 

Configuration Follow-on Operational Test and Evaluation (FOT&E) Final Report, Apr 1997;

Combat Air Forces (CAF) Operational Requirements Document (ORD) 306-00-I/II/III HH-60G 

Block 152 state the requirement for a .50-caliber machine gun on the Rescue HH-60Gs; ACC / 

Central Command (CENTCOM) Combat Mission Need Statement (CMNS) 02-501;

AF Form 1067 ACC 08-115; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53114F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

36 M134D Mini-Gun Components (3010) $30,000 $1,080,000

36 M134D Mini-Guns (3010) $66,667 $2,400,012

Totals $3,480,012
88

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
89

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Air refueling is vital to air mobility and serves to enable and 

multiply the effects of airpower at all levels of warfare. The 

KC-135 Stratotanker is Air Mobility Command’s primary air

refueling platform providing approximately 87 percent of air 

refueling in support of US, allied and coalition military 

aircraft. The KC-135 enhances air refueling capabilities and 

supports deployment, employment, sustainment and

redeployment of joint forces across the full range of military 

operations including nuclear warfare, routine military 

activities and irregular warfare. 

In today’s ever-changing environments, the KC-135 

is being tasked to operate close to high-threat areas. 

Defensive systems are necessary to prevent shoulderfired surface-to-air missile systems from destroying 

aircraft during takeoff, landing and in low-altitude 

flight over mountainous terrain.

Tactical data link technologies and situational 

awareness displays that bring real-time threat 

information, as well as secure radio capability, will 

greatly enhance KC-135 air refueling, airlift and 

aeromedical evacuation missions.

 Air Refueling

 Aeromedical Evacuation

 Airlift

 ANG KC-135 Units Provide 44% of the Total Fleet



KC-135

KC-135 TAB J
90

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

KC-135

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

 Block 30 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures

 Secure Line-of-Sight / Beyond Line-of-Sight Data Link and Situational Awareness Cockpit 

Display Units

 External Overt / Covert Lighting

 Fuel Tank Fire Explosion Protection

 Aircraft Ground Cooling Capability

Essential Capabilities List

 Soft Basket Quick Connect Boom Drogue Adapter

 Block 45 including Electronic Engine Instrument Display Integrated Handset Control 

Software

 Auto-throttles

 Improved Cargo Compartment Lighting

 Cockpit Armor 

Desired Capabilities List

 Improved Aircrew Cockpit Seating

 Improved Crew Bunks

 Advanced Squadron Level Simulator Systems
91

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

KC-135 BLOCK 30 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES

1. Background. Changes in employment tactics place KC-135 aircraft in high threat areas. 

Low altitude refueling, forward positioning, and mission sets establishing the tanker as a 

Command and Control relay are subjecting the KC-135 to increasingly hostile operational 

environments. This threat environment is widely populated with shoulder-fired, Man-Portable 

Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) Infrared (IR) seeking missiles. MANPADS are a significant 

threat during takeoffs, landings and low-altitude refueling missions. A Large Aircraft Infrared 

Countermeasures (LAIRCM) system utilizing current Block 30 components will counter 

MANPADS threats and will not rely on pyrotechnic expendables that are incompatible with a 

fuel-laden aircraft.

2. Source of Need. LAIRCM Operational Requirements Document (ORD) 314-92, Aug 1998; 

LAIRCM Equipage Study; Air Mobility Command (AMC) Requirements and Planning Council 

ranked Defensive Systems as #2 out of 41 at the 2013 Executive Session; AF Form 1067 AMC 

10-137 and 12-053; 2010-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 161 ARW Phoenix IAP, AZ

108 ARW JB McGuire, NJ 134 ARW McGhee Tyson AP, TN 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK

117 ARW Birmingham IAP, AL 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP, UT 171 ARW Pittsburgh IAP, PA

121 ARW Rickenbacker IAP, OH 154 WG Hickam AFB, HI 185 ARW Sioux Gateway AP, IA

126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 155 ARW Lincoln AP, NE 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 157 ARW Pease ITAP, NH 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

105 Group A Kits (3010) $500,000 $52,500,000

30 Group B Kits (3010) $2,000,000 $60,000,000

Total $112,500,000
92

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

KC-135 SECURE LINE-OF-SIGHT / BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT DATA LINK AND 

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS COCKPIT DISPLAY UNITS

1. Background. Recent combat operations highlighted the need for comprehensive, networked 

Command and Control (C2) throughout all theaters of operation. Installation of a robust and 

secure Tactical Data Link (TDL) provides this C2 link and maximizes KC-135 aircrew 

situational awareness with beyond line-of-sight and line-of-sight capabilities. TDL provides 

critical real-time info to KC-135 aircrews such as position of other aircraft, weather conditions 

and current threat locations. This greatly increases the tanker's ability to effectively participate 

in the present day network-centric battlespace. The resulting connectivity enables C2 elements 

near real-time monitoring of mission events, mission status, task completion and resource status. 

It also enhances the situational awareness of both tanker formations and the joint and coalition 

aircraft involved in aerial refueling operations. 

2. Source of Need. Draft annex to Tanker Operational Requirement Document (ORD) 

(AF/A5R); Mobility Air Forces (MAF) Network Enabling Concept, 26 Apr 2006; Air Mobility 

Command (AMC) MAF Data Link Integration Technical Requirements Document, 25 Oct 2006; 

TDL Transformation Capability Development Document (CDD), Increment 1, Joint 

Requirements Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM), 23 Jun 2004; AMC Requirements 

and Planning Council ranked Real-Time Information in the Cockpit / Tanker TDL #5 out of 41 at 

the 2013 Executive Session; AF Form 1067 AMC 11-143; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 161 ARW Phoenix IAP, AZ

108 ARW JB McGuire, NJ 134 ARW McGhee Tyson AP, TN 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK

117 ARW Birmingham IAP, AL 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP, UT 171 ARW Pittsburgh IAP, PA

121 ARW Rickenbacker IAP, OH 154 WG Hickam AFB, HI 185 ARW Sioux Gateway AP, IA

126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 155 ARW Lincoln AP, NE 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 157 ARW Pease ITAP, NH 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

177 Group A Kits (3010) $120,000 $21,240,000

1 NRE (3600) $9,000,000 $9,000,000

195 TDL Radios and Processors (3010) * $380,000 $74,100,000

Total $104,340,000

* Includes one spare per unit.

.
93

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

KC-135 EXTERNAL OVERT / COVERT LIGHTING 

1. Background. Current KC-135 exterior lighting does not meet Military Specification 

illumination standards. This deficiency has been highlighted during ground testing conducted by 

the Air Force Research Laboratory. By replacing the existing incandescent lighting with updated 

Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting, KC-135 combat and peacetime operations benefit in three 

areas: safety, survivability and sustainability. LED lighting increases safety margins by 

providing significantly better aircraft visual acquisition during ground and airborne operations. 

The covert mode allows KC-135 crews the ability to operate in accordance with theater 

requirements while allowing friendly forces with night vision devices to see the aircraft. Covert 

lighting drastically reduces the potential of a mid-air collision, which has been identified as a 

safety concern during night operations in theater. The upgraded lighting will increase Mean 

Time Between Failures (MTBF) from 40 to 60 hours for incandescent bulbs to over 10,000 hours 

with LEDs. This significant increase in MTBF will drastically reduce supply costs and decrease 

maintenance requirements. 

2. Source of Need. Air Mobility Command (AMC) Requirements and Planning Council ranked 

external overt / covert lighting as #22 out of 41 at the 2013 Executive Session; AF Form 1067 

AMC 10-044; 2011-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 161 ARW Phoenix IAP, AZ

108 ARW JB McGuire, NJ 134 ARW McGhee Tyson AP, TN 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK

117 ARW Birmingham IAP, AL 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP, UT 171 ARW Pittsburgh IAP, PA

121 ARW Rickenbacker IAP, OH 154 WG Hickam AFB, HI 185 ARW Sioux Gateway AP, IA

126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 155 ARW Lincoln AP, NE 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 157 ARW Pease ITAP, NH 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218F 

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost 

197 LED Light Kits (3010) $70,000 $13,790,000

Total $13,790,000

* Includes 20 spares.
94

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

KC-135 FUEL TANK FIRE EXPLOSION PROTECTION

1. Background. Changes in employment concepts are placing KC-135 aircraft in a threat 

environment that is widely populated with shoulder-fired, Man-Portable Air Defense Systems 

(MANPADS), Anti-Aircraft Artillery, and small arms. All of these threats are significant during 

takeoff, landing and low-altitude flight over mountainous terrain. Even though tankers have 

multiple engines and redundant flight control systems, fires and wing structural damage induced 

by fire can cause these systems to fail and destroy the aircraft. Fuel tank fire explosion 

protection reduces that vulnerability. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), through FAA 

RIN 2120-AI23 Fuel Tank Flammability Inerting, sets acceptable flammability exposure values 

in tanks most prone to explosion or requires the installation of an ignition mitigation system in an 

affected fuel tank. The KC-135 flies into areas with potential MANPADS threats and requires

explosion protection in their fuel tanks.

2. Source of Need. FAA RIN 2120-AI23 Fuel Tank Flammability Inerting; 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 161 ARW Phoenix IAP, AZ

108 ARW JB McGuire, NJ 134 ARW McGhee Tyson AP, TN 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK

117 ARW Birmingham IAP, AL 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP, UT 171 ARW Pittsburgh IAP, PA

121 ARW Rickenbacker IAP, OH 154 WG Hickam AFB, HI 185 ARW Sioux Gateway AP, IA

126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 155 ARW Lincoln AP, NE 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 157 ARW Pease ITAP, NH 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

177 Fuel Tank Conversions (3010) $1,000,000 $177,000,000

1 NRE (3600) $5,000,000 $5,000,000

Total $182,000,000
95

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

KC-135 AIRCRAFT GROUND COOLING CAPABILITY

1. Background. KC-135 aircraft currently have no internal means of cooling when below 

2,000 feet Above Ground Level (AGL), which is the point at which the cockpit becomes 

pressurized and cooling systems become effective. Current and future employment locations 

require crews and aircraft to operate in extreme environments. Temperatures at deployed 

locations routinely exceed 100°F. This ambient temperature results in cockpit temperatures of 

140°F and cargo compartment temperatures of 170°F. Crews generally spend greater than one

hour in these conditions, which is not conducive to mission accomplishment. Currently ground 

cooling carts are the primary method to attempt aircraft and crew temperature reduction. Ground 

cooling carts are removed prior to engine start and are not usable if mission delays occur. 

Multiple civilian companies build vapor cycle air conditioning units for aircraft to supplement 

ground cooling. Commercial systems can produce 24,000 British Thermal Units of cooling at 

600 cfm, approximately a normal house-sized air conditioner, within normal aircraft power and 

weight requirements. The KC-135 can leverage this technology to provide a limited amount of 

cooling for crew and aircraft performance. This limited system provides crews and aircraft a 

more robust operating capability, reduces crew fatigue and minimizes unsafe temperature 

conditions. 

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 Air Mobility Command (AMC) 06-131; 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 161 ARW Phoenix IAP, AZ

108 ARW JB McGuire, NJ 134 ARW McGhee Tyson AP, TN 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK

117 ARW Birmingham IAP, AL 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP, UT 171 ARW Pittsburgh IAP, PA

121 ARW Rickenbacker IAP, OH 154 WG Hickam AFB, HI 185 ARW Sioux Gateway AP, IA

126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 155 ARW Lincoln AP, NE 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 157 ARW Pease ITAP, NH 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost 

107 Ground Cooling Units (3010) $40,000 $4,280,000

Total $4,280,000

* Includes 20 spares.
96

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
97

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

The contributions of our citizen airmen are 

without equal and provide both State Governors 

and Combatant Commanders with highly skilled, 

professional and flexible forces on a daily basis. 

Air National Guard (ANG) Logistics is the 

largest career field in the US Air Force, 

encompassing over 21 different occupational 

series. They range in scope from Aircraft 

Maintenance and Inventory Management, to 

Traffic Management and Petroleum, Oils and 

Lubricants Management. Logistics operations in 

the 54 States, Territories and the District of Columbia prepare and train for their dual mission of 

supporting worldwide contingency deployments as well as responding to State emergencies. The 

Logistics team plays a key role in getting people and supplies where they need to be when they 

need to be there in order to generate sorties in support 

of Domestic Operations and Overseas Contingency 

Operations. 

Presently the ANG has functioned at a prolonged high 

operations tempo, driving the need to concurrently 

modernize and recapitalize its aircraft fleet. The ANG 

operates and maintains the oldest aircraft in the Air 

Force inventory, with the average age of ANG aircraft 

being 27 years.

Today’s increasingly austere fiscal environment drives the need for logisticians to reduce both 

product life cycle costs and the cost of enterprise logistics processes. Procurement of devices 

that enhance maintenance efficiency and safety, 

while improving capabilities, will lead to improved 

aircraft availability, reduced operating costs, and 

enhanced Agile Combat Support (ACS). Devices 

such as the maintenance inspection platforms, leak 

detectors and digital test equipment will reduce 

aircraft downtime, permit Logistics personnel to 

maintain a high rate of sortie generation, and ensure

the longevity, relevance, and reliability of our aging 

fleet in a safe and efficient manner.

 Homeland Defense

 Provide Agile and Responsive Forces

 Viability Through Modernization

Logistics

Logistics TAB K Logistics TAB K
98

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Logistics

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference 

Critical Capabilities List

 Aircraft Test Equipment

 Aircraft Support Equipment 

 Advanced Repair Capability

 Maintenance Support Vehicles

 Maintenance Stands and Platforms

Essential Capabilities List

 Maintenance Lift and Hydraulic Equipment; Gantry Crane, Remotely Piloted Aircraft 

Ground Control Station Lift for Aircraft Loading and Shipment, Universal Hydraulic Test 

Stands with Purifier, and Portable Steam Cleaner

 Engine Test Equipment; F-15 Secondary Power Tester, HH-60 Engine Test Stand, Engine 

Borescope, and Handheld Thermal Imaging

 Maintenance Test Equipment; Version 3 Moving Target Simulator, and Joint Surveillance 

and Target Attack Radar System Bus Tester 

 Multi-Purpose Maintenance Vehicle 

 KC-135 Interior Lighting

Desired Capabilities List

 Storage and Shelter Maintenance Equipment; Compliant Fall Restraint, F-15 External Fuel 

Tank Storage, Sunshade Maintenance Equipment

 Modernized and Standard Aircraft Equipment; Heat Shield Brakes, High Output Hydraulic 

Pumps, Offload Totalizer 

 Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System G-Meter

 HH-60 Cribbing

 HH-60 Collapsible and Deployable Towbar
99

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Agile Combat Support

LOGISTICS AIRCRAFT TEST EQUIPMENT

1. Background. Aircraft test equipment critical to daily operations at Air National Guard 

(ANG) units is quickly nearing the end of its designed useful life. As the equipment ages, it 

becomes increasingly difficult to sustain and expensive to repair. In many cases, the original 

manufacturer is no longer in business, is unwilling to produce outdated equipment, or allows

other sources to produce their proprietary equipment. The following critical maintenance 

capabilities require immediate attention: Airdata / Pitot Static test set, 50/60 Stray Voltage PreLoad Tester, and multi-platform hydrogen leak detector. The Airdata / Pitot Static test sets and 

50/60 testers (F-16, A-10 and F-15) are unsustainable, requiring fielding of replacement testers

suitable for use during deployed sortie generation. The multi-platform Airdata / Pitot Static 

testers accurately simulate in-flight pressure conditions by precisely controlling and measuring 

altitude and airspeed pressure with the aircraft’s pitot-static system. This tester is used to test, 

certify, calibrate and troubleshoot aircraft pitot-static systems or associated pneumatic flight 

control systems. The dual channel operation allows operators to perform dynamic, qualitative 

calibration and leak testing for "on ground" simulation of altitude and airspeed pressures. The 

50/60 tester is a stray voltage tester used by munitions personnel to verify the absence of voltage 

prior to munitions loading, and that it is safe to load the munition. The tester verifies 

communication between smart weapons and the aircraft. Procurement of modern leak detection 

equipment using tracer gas or ultrasonic sound to identify leaks will enable maintenance 

personnel to troubleshoot and repair leaks faster than when using legacy tools and methods. 

Current methods require technicians to refuel aircraft to determine the validity of a fuel system 

repair. If a leak is still noted, the aircraft must be defueled, repaired and then refueled again to 

check the validity of the repair, creating a time-consuming cycle to resolve the discrepancy. 

2. Source of Need. 2011-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Requirement.

3. Units Impacted. The multi-platform Airdata / Pitot Static tester and the multi-platform 

Hydrogen Leak Detector impact all ANG manned aircraft wings. The 50/60 tester impacts F-16, 

A-10 and F-15 units.

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834F, 72834F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost * Program Cost 

180 50/60 Testers (3080) $25,000 $4,500,000

156 Hydrogen Leak Detectors (3080) $30,000 $4,680,000

176 Airdata / Pitot Static Testers (3080) $100,000 $17,600,000

Total $26,780,000

* Includes 10% in spares.
100

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Agile Combat Support

LOGISTICS AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

1. Background. Current maintenance operations depend upon support equipment with 

technology from the 1970s and 1980s. This legacy equipment is cumbersome to use, expensive 

to operate, and often produces significant safety concerns. Procurement of updated equipment 

enhances maintenance efficiency and safety while improving aircraft availability, reducing 

operating costs, and enhancing Agile Combat Support (ACS) capabilities. MJ-1E electric 

jammers will improve load crew training effectiveness and safety by eliminating noise and 

pollution from legacy diesel engines used in enclosed training facilities. This equipment 

conforms to the Presidential Directive to reduce the use of fossil fuels within the Department of 

Defense (DOD). The enhanced e-Tools reader with tablet technology eliminates the use of 

expensive laptop devices, which introduce safety concerns when used in certain maintenance 

activities. Replacements reduce the cost of the e-Tools program to one-third of the current cost 

while also improving technical order access and usability. Procurement of the VXI-based midlife upgrade for the Improved Avionics Intermediate Shop (IAIS) will update electronics, rectify 

diminishing manufacturing source issues, and extend the shop’s useful life to 2030. A shortfall 

for 72 kW flight line generators exists, affecting the ability of wings to prep aircraft for flight. A 

replacement to the 35-ton E-8 Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS)

Axle Jack will provide greater safety and reduce task duration since the jacks are at capacity. 

2. Source of Need. Presidential Directive on Energy Conservation; 2011-2013 ARC WEPTAC 

Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. MJ-1E electric jammer: all ANG Combat Air Forces (CAF) units. 

VXI-IAIS systems: all ANG F-16 and A-10 units. Axle Jack: 116 ACW. Flight Line 

Generators and e-Tools: all ANG aircraft maintenance organizations. 

4. Program Details. PECs: 22834F, 52844F, 72834F, 207133F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

6053 e-Tools (3080) $2,842 $17,202,626

56 MJ-1E Electric Jammers (3080) $140,000 $7,840,000

13 VXI-IAIS Upgrade Kits (3080) $2,540,000 $33,020,000

10 Axle Jack E-8 JSTARS (3080) $15,000 $150,000

186 Flight Line Generators 75 kW (3080) $60,000 $11,160,000

Total $69,372,626
101

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Agile Combat Support

LOGISTICS ADVANCED REPAIR CAPABILITY

1. Background. The F108 engine has been reliable for many years. More than half of the F108

engines installed on the KC-135 airframe have not been reworked since they were installed 

during the R-model conversion. During its life cycle, the F108 has experienced common and 

known issues that impact its availability. Specifically, the engine has an identified issue with 

shroud droop and compressor stator delamination. The F108 System Program Office currently

recommends waivers to technical order guidance requiring engine removal or advises placing the 

engine on Foreign Object Damage watch lists. Neither answer provides a physical repair to 

damaged but crucial engine components. The F108 has now entered into the CFM Propulsion 

Upgrade Program (C-PUP) with a schedule that called for 60 engines to be upgraded last year 

(FY13), doubling to 120 engines annually in following years until all 1,440 F108 engines in the 

KC-135 fleet have been overhauled. This process is expected to take 12 years to complete. The 

long term C-PUP solution does not provide an interim or more immediate solution for F108

engine issues prevalent in the Air National Guard (ANG). Either identification of interim repair 

capabilities that fix the known issues with F108 engines or an acceleration of the C-PUP 

initiative is critical to ensure long-term KC-135 fleet availability and safety of flight. A 

candidate for an interim solution is the F108 Upper / Lower Case Replacement initiative recently 

validated by the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center. At 1/14 the cost of the C-PUP 

overhaul, this repair involves the installation of modernized parts with improved coatings 

providing a viable interim solution. 

2. Source of Need. 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

101 ARW Bangor IAP, ME 128 ARW Gen Mitchell IAP, WI 161 ARW Phoenix IAP, AZ

108 ARW JB McGuire, NJ 134 ARW McGhee Tyson AP, TN 168 ARW Eielson AFB, AK

117 ARW Birmingham IAP, AL 151 ARW Salt Lake City IAP, UT 171 ARW Pittsburgh IAP, PA

121 ARW Rickenbacker IAP, OH 154 WG Hickam AFB, HI 185 ARW Sioux Gateway AP, IA

126 ARW Scott AFB, IL 155 ARW Lincoln AP, NE 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

127 WG Selfridge ANGB, MI 157 ARW Pease ITAP, NH 190 ARW Forbes Fld, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 41218F, 22834F, 72834F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

5 F108 Enhanced Engine Repair Capabilities

(3080) $1,000,000 $5,000,000

72 F108 Upper / Lower Cases (3080) $260,000 $18,720,000

100 F108 C-PUP (3080) $4,000,000 $400,000,000

Total $423,720,000
102

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Agile Combat Support

LOGISTICS MAINTENANCE SUPPORT VEHICLES

1. Background. Current maintenance operations depend upon equipment with technology from 

the 1970s and 1980s. This legacy equipment is cumbersome to use, expensive to operate and 

produces safety concerns. Procurement of safe tow vehicles enhances maintenance efficiency 

and safety, while improving capabilities, and ultimately leads to improved aircraft availability, 

lowered operating costs and enhanced Agile Combat Support (ACS) capabilities. The alternative 

tow vehicle utilizes new technology to provide improved maneuverability and visibility during 

towing operations, resulting in better utilization of hangar space, as well as improved sheltering 

of aging aircraft. This vehicle is intuitive to operate, requires less time to position aircraft which 

saves man-hours, enhances operational safety, and reduces the current deployment footprint. 

This vehicle conforms to the Presidential Directive to reduce use of fossil fuels within the 

Department of Defense (DOD).

2. Source of Need. Presidential Directive on Energy Conservation; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC 

Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. All ANG Combat Air Forces (CAF) and Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) 

units.

4. Program Details. PEC: 22834F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

56 CAF Alternative Tow Vehicles (3080) $200,000 $11,200,000

Total $11,200,000

* Includes 10% spares.
103

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Agile Combat Support

LOGISTICS MAINTENANCE STANDS AND PLATFORMS

1. Background. Current isochronal (ISO) inspection stands no longer meet Air Force 

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (AFOSH) or Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA) standards. Many stands currently in use are over 40 years old and 

require frequent maintenance actions in order to maintain serviceability yet the stands are still 

critical to accomplishing periodic inspection requirements. Established workarounds delay 

completion of those inspection requirements, effectively doubling inspection times and 

negatively impacting aircraft availability. New stands alleviate unnecessary risk and allow 

maintainers to complete aircraft-specific tasks.

2. Source of Need. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standards, 29 CFR 

1910 Subpart D; 2010-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. All ANG C-130H, C-17 and KC-135 units. Fifteen stands were procured 

through FY13 for C-130H units.

4. Program Details. PEC: 41115F, 41130F, 41218F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

3 C-130 Maintenance Platforms and Stands 

(3080)

$545,000 $1,635,000

5 C-17 Maintenance Platforms and Stands 

(3080)

$6,000,000 $30,000,000

18 KC-135 Maintenance Platforms and Stands 

(3080)

$4,000,000 $72,000,000

Total $103,635,000
104

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
105

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

The Air National Guard (ANG) manned airborne reconnaissance and Processing, Exploitation 

and Dissemination (PED) assets fill critical Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) 

and Incident Awareness and Assessment (IAA) requirements. These ANG resources can be 

called upon to support Combatant Commands (COCOM) in the specific Areas of Responsibility 

(AOR) as well as for Defense Support to Civil Authorities (DSCA) operations and Counter-Drug

(CD) enforcement.

RC-26B Condor - The RC-26B is a unique

manned ISR platform providing day and night Full 

Motion Video (FMV) for IAA and ISR 

requirements with two configurations: Block 20 

and Block 25. The RC-26B is a Low Density /

High Demand (LD/HD) platform that operates in 

the US and overseas. The aircraft supports

COCOM Overseas Contingency Operations 

(OCO), and IAA for disaster response, National 

Special Security Events (NSSE), South-West 

Border operations (SWB), and CD. All 

modernization efforts will move toward a common configuration of aircraft. Eleven aircraft are 

attached to 11 ANG units from three gaining commands: Air Combat Command (ACC), Air 

Mobility Command (AMC) and Air Education and Training Command (AETC). RC-26B 

locations include AL, AZ, CA, FL, MS, NM, NY, TX, WA, WI and WV.

Distributed Common Ground System (DCGS) - The Air Force DCGS, designated the 

AN/GSQ-272 Sentinel, is the primary ISR PED system. DCGS provides multi-discipline 

intelligence derived from ISR platforms to COCOMs, Component-Numbered Air Forces 

(C-NAF), and national command authorities across the globe 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. 

Through distributed (reach-back and 

deployed) and collaborative operations, 

DCGS personnel enable the Air Force to 

engage in multiple, simultaneous military 

operations across the globe. ANG DCGS 

locations include AL, AR, CA, GA, HI, IN, 

KS, MA, NV, UT and VA. 

 Multi-Discipline Intelligence Collection

 Distributed Common Ground System (DCGS)

Intelligence, Surveillance

& Reconnaissance

Intelligence, Surveillance & 

Reconnaissance TAB L
106

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

RC-26B:

 Block 25 Reconfiguration

 Block 20 to Block 25 Common Configuration

 Avionics Modernization

 Interoperable Beyond Line-of-Sight Communications Data Link

 Second Full Motion Video Sensor Including Laser Designator

Distributed Common Ground System:

 Fully Integrated Processing, Exploitation and Dissemination Suite

 Unclassified Processing, Analysis and Dissemination System and Network Architecture

Essential Capabilities List

RC-26B:

 Late Generation Target Tracking Radar

 Aircraft Performance Upgrade

 Electronic Attack (Communication Denial)

 Tactical Airborne Command, Control, Communications and Computer

Distributed Common Ground System:

 AN/ASQ-230 Signals Intelligence Scenario Based Trainer

Desired Capabilities List

RC-26B:

 Generator Upgrade

 Simulator

 Conformal Pod Capability

Distributed Common Ground System:

 Mission Fusion and Analysis Toolset
107

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

RC-26B BLOCK 25 RECONFIGURATION

1. Background. The Block 25 RC-26 Mission Management System (MMS), Electro-Optical /

Infrared (EO/IR) Full Motion Video (FMV) sensor and communications suite are outdated and 

unsupportable due to diminishing manufacturing sources. The EO/IR sensor is dated, unreliable

and not capable of High Definition (HD) FMV. Due to evolving battlespace communications 

requirements the Block 25 communications suite no longer provides adequate capabilities for 

Combatant Commands (COCOM) or Domestic Operations. To remedy these shortfalls, the 

Block 25 aircraft requires major upgrades. MMS hardware and software capabilities must be 

sustainable, expandable and provide HD FMV imagery for intelligence exploitation. A late 

generation EO/IR HD FMV sensor system provides industry standard HD imagery and sensor 

reliability. The existing radio suite does not provide the latest generation communication 

capability required for full spectrum ground element voice and data and could compromise 

safety. A late generation radio suite will provide real-time data link and voice providing 

expanded situational awareness for all Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) 

elements. The addition of a line-of-sight data link for sensor slewing and downlink will provide 

bi-directional analog and/or digital data and video transmission simultaneously. This system will 

be capable of multi bi-directional band transmission integrating into the MMS via Web-browser 

control and provide for both Type 1 National Security Agency (NSA) and Advanced Encryption 

Standard (AES) encryption. Data rates will be capable of supporting a minimum of two HD 

video streams with metadata and include H.264, Moving Pictures Expert Group (MPEG-4) and 

Frequency Modulation (FM) analog waveforms. It will simultaneously transmit common data to 

multiple platforms using two different channels in one or two different bands and receive in two 

different channels from a single source. The downlink capability will also integrate legacy 

L-band line-of-sight (LOS) FMV downlink and will be capable of beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) 

data, voice, data and video transmission.

 

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 RC-26B Reconfiguration A4MY 13-032; 2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

115 FW Truax Fld, WI 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY

125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

130 AW Yeager AP, WV 150 FW Kirtland AFB, NM 187 FW Montgomery RAP, AL

141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ

4. Program Details. PEC: 502889F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

1 Reconfiguration NRE (3600) $200,000 $200,000

6 Shipset Kits (3010) $1,063,000 $11,500,000

Total $11,700,000

* Includes 10% spares.
108

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

RC-26B BLOCK 20 TO BLOCK 25 COMMON CONFIGURATION

1. Background. The RC-26B fleet of 11 aircraft is currently split into two configurations: 

Block 20 and Block 25. Each has completely different sensor systems including Mission 

Management Systems (MMS) and communications suites for Intelligence, Surveillance and 

Reconnaissance (ISR) operations. Currently, six Block 25 aircraft are programmed to be 

reconfigured with late generation sensors, mission equipment and a communications capability. 

However, five Block 20 aircraft do no not meet threshold mission capability requirements for 

Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). Additionally, training and scheduling are problematic 

due to differences in aircraft block configurations. Operational missions require comprehensive 

integrated sensor capabilities throughout all theaters of operation including domestic operations. 

The RC-26B requires a common configuration and threshold capabilities of the Block 25 aircraft 

across the fleet. Common configuration distributes flight hours and extends airframe life cycles 

resulting in greater mission efficiencies. The Block 25 capability provides sustainable and 

expandable MMS hardware and software that enables intelligence exploitation of HD FMV 

imagery. In addition, late generation Electro-Optical / Infrared (EO/IR) High Definition (HD) 

Full Motion Video (FMV) sensor systems provide industry standards in advanced HD imagery 

and sensor reliability. A late generation radio suite provides real-time situation data and voice 

capabilities for the enhancement of ISR situational awareness and safety. Also, the addition of a 

line-of-sight data link for sensor slewing and downlink provides bi-directional analog and/or 

digital data and video transmission in multiple bands simultaneously. A beyond line-of-sight 

(BLOS) data link capable of voice, data and video transmission is also needed. In addition, the 

aircraft needs the capability of an adaptable antenna mounting system and a self-protection 

system.

2. Source of Need. 2009-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

115 FW Truax Fld, WI 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY

125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

130 AW Yeager AP, WV 150 FW Kirtland AFB, NM 187 FW Montgomery RAP, AL

141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ

4. Program Details. PEC: 502889F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

1 Reconfiguration NRE (3600) $400,000 $400,000

5 Reconfiguration: Multiple Systems (3010) $980,000 $4,900,000

Total $5,300,000

* Includes 10% spares.
109

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

RC-26B AVIONICS MODERNIZATION

1. Background. RC-26B avionics are obsolete and unsustainable due to diminishing 

manufacturing sources. The affected areas of the overall avionics system are the Global 

Positioning System (GPS), Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS) Displays, Flight 

Management System (FMS), as well as the navigation and communication radios. The FMS is 

not certified to perform GPS approaches and does not comply with Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) and International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Communications,

Navigation and Surveillance / Air Traffic Management (CNS/ATM) requirements. A GPS 

failure would restrict crews to operating in Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC) only. The 

RC-26B does not have Frequency Modulation (FM) frequency immunity on any of its navigation 

radios, and the communication radios do not have the proper frequency spacing requirements to 

legally operate in today’s congested European Command (EUCOM) area of operations. 

Modernization of the avionics system ensures the RC-26B is compliant with global airspace 

mandates. The current configuration compromises safety as the airspace worldwide becomes 

increasingly congested. FM frequency immunity is required to ensure safe operation of aircraft 

when flying terminal area approaches to prevent a mishap and possible Controlled Flight Into 

Terrain (CFIT). Additionally, battlefield requirements now demand the use of night vision 

compatible cockpits and utilization of certified GPS approaches to safely depart and land at 

austere and remote airfields. The current RC-26B avionics suite and GPS do not meet these 

requirements.

2. Source of Need. 2009-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

115 FW Truax Fld, WI 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY

125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

130 AW Yeager AP, WV 150 FW Kirtland AFB, NM 187 FW Montgomery RAP, AL

141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ

4. Program Details. PEC: 502889F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

1 Avionics NRE (3600) $1,300,000 $1,300,000

11 Avionics (3010) $1,420,000 $15,620,000

Total $16,920,000

* Includes 10% spares.
110

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

RC-26B INTEROPERABLE BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT COMMUNICATIONS DATA 

LINK

1. Background. The RC-26B has no capability to interact in the Global Information Grid (GIG) 

using broadband beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) technology or to communicate within a Common 

Data Link (CDL) environment. The rapidly advancing requirement for real-time intelligence in a 

network-centric battlespace is the standard that airborne Intelligence, Surveillance and 

Reconnaissance (ISR) assets are currently utilizing. BLOS CDL and High Definition (HD) Full 

Motion Video (FMV) downlink capabilities to Command and Control (C2) nodes and ground 

forces are critical for all airborne ISR platforms. The RC-26 provides a vast amount of 

intelligence data and HD FMV that cannot be fully utilized by the warfighter due to its BLOS 

challenge. This modernization will enhance operational situational awareness for intelligence 

gatherers and ground elements, and enable platform-to-platform and platform-to-C2 data 

exchange and sensor slewing. Enabling the manned RC-26 ISR aircraft with wideband BLOS 

FMV and data will greatly enhance ground force situational awareness, safety and provide a vast 

amount of HD intelligence imagery for any Combatant Commands (COCOM) or Domestic 

Operations tasking.

2. Source of Need. AF Form 1067 A4MY 10-024; 2011-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

34. Units Impacted.

115 FW Truax Fld, WI 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY

125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

130 AW Yeager AP, WV 150 FW Kirtland AFB, NM 187 FW Montgomery RAP, AL

141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ

4. Program Details. PEC: 502889F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

1 Communications Down Link NRE (3600) $1,000,000 $1,000,000

11 Interoperable BLOS Communications Data 

Links (3010) $482,000 $5,302,000

Total $6,302,000

* Includes 10% spares.
111

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

RC-26B SECOND FULL MOTION VIDEO SENSOR INCLUDING LASER 

DESIGNATOR

1. Background. The RC-26B fleet currently operates two aircraft configurations (Block 20 and 

Block 25) each with a single Electro-Optical / Infrared (EO/IR) Full Motion Video (FMV) 

sensor. Combatant Commands (COCOM) require distinct dual EO/IR FMV sensor capability 

from each platform. The capability to simultaneously track multiple targets is needed for 

increased security and safety for ground elements and provides enhanced intelligence gathering. 

The addition of a laser designator will provide the capability to complete target exploitation. 

Dual sensors with laser designation capability are the threshold for current battlefield 

commanders, provide a common configuration across more than one ISR asset, and provide 

similar capabilities for war planners and operations. Current mission requirements dictate a 

comprehensive integrated dual High Definition (HD) sensor capability throughout all theaters of 

operation, including Domestic Operations.

2. Source of Need. 2011-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

115 FW Truax Fld, WI 144 FW Fresno IAP, CA 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY

125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 186 ARW Meridian RAP, MS

130 AW Yeager AP, WV 150 FW Kirtland AFB, NM 187 FW Montgomery RAP, AL

141 ARW Fairchild AFB, WA 162 FW Tucson IAP, AZ

4. Program Details. PEC: 502889F

Remaining Quantity Required * Unit Cost Program Cost

1 Sensor NRE (3600) $1,100,000 $1,100,000

11 Sensors (3010) $482,000 $5,302,000

Total $6,402,000

* Includes 10% spares.
112

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM FULLY INTEGRATED PROCESSING, 

EXPLOITATION AND DISSEMINATION SUITE

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) and Air Force (AF) Distributed Common Ground 

Systems (DCGS) lack the capability to efficiently provide Processing, Exploitation and 

Dissemination (PED) support for the Combatant Command (COCOM)-tasked Full Motion Video 

(FMV) missions. To support today’s fast-paced tactical missions and avoid the software 

limitations inherent in the current architecture, ANG DCGS analysts are growing increasingly 

reliant on workarounds and supplemental systems. The current architecture requires the use of 

five separate systems to accomplish current mission taskings. Use of multiple systems leads to 

task saturation, making it difficult to meet the stringent timelines implemented by COCOMs. 

Moving from five systems to a single standardized hardware and software solution immediately 

reduces exploitation timelines by an average of 50 percent and yields less reliance on 

workarounds, thus enhancing overall analytical support. In addition, the AF DCGS enterprise 

has migrated to United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) standards as the 

baseline for mission execution. It is paramount to implement a capability that provides the same 

functionality and support employed by Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) and 

Active Duty Air Force sites. This capability will reduce complexity and interface seamlessly 

with the existing AN/GSQ-272 SENTINEL weapons system architecture, which will enhance 

support to both conventional and Special Forces ground commanders. Production timelines 

significantly decrease while providing proven data archival, exploitation, sort and retrieval 

capabilities. Additionally, acquiring updated systems will allow the ANG to provide PED to 

Quick Reaction Capabilities (QRC) such as Wide Area Motion Imagery (WAMI) and Light 

Detection and Ranging (LIDAR). The software and hardware solution exists and includes the 

required exploitation capabilities for current and future mission requirements. 

2. Source of Need. 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

102 IW Otis ANGB, MA 123 IS Little Rock AFB, AR 181 IW Terre Haute IAP, IN

117 IS Birmingham IAP, AL 152 IS Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 184 IW McConnell AFB, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 505208F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

6 PED Suites (3080) $860,000 $5,160,000

6 PED Suite Training (3840) $210,000 $1,260,000

Total $6,420,000
113

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM UNITS UNCLASSIFIED 

PROCESSING, ANALYSIS AND DISSEMINATION SYSTEM AND NETWORK

ARCHITECTURE

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance 

(ISR) units have highly trained and experienced analysts who frequently provide intelligence 

products for both State and Federal missions. Current intelligence systems and architectures lack 

the ability to provide efficient and effective products in a timely manner. DCGS units require 

the capability to produce intelligence products from any ANG Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) 

or manned ISR platform, as well as other civil assets, including the required communication 

architecture and hardware. Installing an unclassified Processing, Assessment and Dissemination 

(PAD) system and communication architecture allows unit personnel at home station to provide 

direct support to first responders, State and Federal agencies, and other involved parties 

regardless of location. 

2. Source of Need. US Air Force Katrina / Rita Lessons Learned, 2006; US Air Force 

Homeland Defense Briefs, 27 Feb - 1 Mar 2007; California Wildfires 2007-2013; Haiti, 2010; 

Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill, 2010; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability. 

3. Units Impacted.

102 IW Otis ANGB, MA 123 IS Little Rock AFB, AR 181 IW Terre Haute IAP, IN

117 IS Birmingham IAP, AL 152 IS Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 184 IW McConnell AFB, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 505208F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

13 Mobile Receiver / Analysis Work Centers (3080) $250,000 $3,250,000

13 PAD Hardware and Software Suites (3080) $602,000 $7,826,000

13 Video Downlink Receivers (3080) $200,000 $2,600,000

13 Tactical Radios (PRC-117) (3080) $35,000 $455,000

13 Prime Movers (3080) $50,000 $650,000

Total $14,781,000
114

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
115

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

* = District of Columbia 

*

 

The Air National Guard (ANG) supports crucial special 

missions including Distinguished Visitor (DV) 

transportation. Each of these special missions has 

unique requirements beyond the traditional support 

provided to the rest of the ANG fleet.

The ANG Operational Support Aircraft (OSA) fleet 

includes the C-40C and C-38A flown by the District of 

Columbia, Air National Guard’s 201st Airlift Squadron 

(AS) at Joint 

Base Andrews, 

MD and the 

C-21A flown by the 201 AS at Colorado Springs. The 

C-21A currently does not have any critical capability 

requirements. The 201 AS aircraft provide worldwide

DV transportation for Congressional, Department of 

Defense, Air Force and National Guard missions. The 

primary mission of all OSA aircraft is to ensure 

passenger safety and comfort while providing the utmost in reliability. The ANG’s 

modernization efforts will continue to focus on keeping these aircraft modernized and safe.

Since the ANG began the C-40C mission, demand has increased significantly. In order to 

improve service and increase mission availability an additional C-40C aircraft is required. The 

C-38A was originally acquired to support Continental United States (CONUS) operations while 

current missions dictate more overseas travel. Replacing the C-38A fleet with a more capable 

aircraft will extend the range into European 

airspace and provide the required support.

 Provides Special Mission Transportation of 

Distinguished Visitors

 ANG OSA Units Provide: C-38 - 100%, C-40 -

27%, C-21 - 7% of the Total Fleet

Operational 

Support Aircraft

Operational Support 

Aircraft TAB M
116

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Operational Support Aircraft

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

C-38A:

 Replacement Aircraft Program

C-40C:

 Avionics Modernization

 Land-Based High Speed Data

 Procurement

 Cabin Refurbishment

Essential Capabilities List

C-38A:

 None

C-40C:

 Multi-Scan Weather Radar

 Satellite Based Television

 Digital Heads-Up Display with Synthetic Vision Technology

Desired Capabilities List

C-38A:

 None

C-40C:

 None
117

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-38A REPLACEMENT AIRCRAFT PROGRAM

1. Background. A C-38A replacement aircraft is required to support the existing Distinguished 

Visitor (DV) transportation fleet at the 201st Airlift Squadron (AS). The unit supports 

Congressional members and delegations, Executive Branch, Department of Defense, Air Force

and National Guard travel missions worldwide. Current requirements identify four small DV 

support aircraft. The 201 AS currently operates only two C-38A aircraft. Replacing the C-38A 

fleet addresses several operational shortfalls and significantly improves the mission capability. 

The replacement aircraft will extend the non-stop range of the aircraft well into European 

airspace and complement the existing larger C-40Cs for smaller contingents. This capability 

eliminates time-consuming enroute refueling stops and decreases extended duty days for 

passengers and aircrews. In addition to the lack of range, the C-38A has historically 

demonstrated a substandard mission capable rate, which is unacceptable for aircraft in the DV 

transportation arena.

2. Source of Need. Air Mobility Command (AMC) Operational Requirements Document 

(ORD) 000-90, 12 Jun 1995, modified 3 May 1996; NGB Mission Need Statement 002-94 and 

NGB ORD 002-94, 24 Jul 1994; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted. 

201 AS JB Andrews, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 41314F 

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

2 Additional Aircraft (3010) $66,752,500 $133,505,000

2 Replacement Aircraft (3010) $66,752,500 $133,505,000

Total $267,010,000
118

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-40C AVIONICS MODERNIZATION

1. Background. The changing technological landscape has re-defined the equipment and tools 

necessary to effectively conduct business in today’s corporate and government environments. 

The C-40C is not equipped to take advantage of, nor comply with, the emergence of several next

generation Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) capabilities. The first of these capabilities is 

the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) which augments the aircraft’s Global Positioning 

System (GPS) by improving its accuracy, integrity and availability, and allows the aircraft to rely 

on GPS for guidance during precision approaches. Localizer Performance with Vertical 

Guidance (LPV) is another requirement that allows the highest precision GPS (WAAS enabled) 

approaches to be flown. Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) enhances safety 

by making an aircraft visible, real-time, to Air Traffic Control (ATC) and to other appropriately 

equipped aircraft, and will be mandatory by 1 Jan 2020. These capabilities allow the aircraft to 

operate with increased safety. 

2. Source of Need. Air National Guard (ANG) Operational Requirements Document 002-02,

19 Feb 2001; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

201 AS JB Andrews, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 41314F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

3 Avionics Suites (3010) $1,000,000 $3,000,000

Total $3,000,000
119

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-40C LAND-BASED HIGH SPEED DATA

1. Background. The 201st Airlift Squadron (AS) utilizes the C-40C to provide worldwide air 

transportation to Congressional Members and delegations, the Executive Branch, Department of 

Defense officials and high-ranking US and foreign dignitaries. In today’s information age, the 

amount of data needed to effectively conduct business has exponentially increased. The current 

C-40C fleet relies on an expensive, low bandwidth satellite-based capability that fails to provide 

the needed throughput to allow Internet Protocol video and data capabilities that senior leaders 

require. More C-40C customers are flying in the Continental United States (CONUS) region and 

require faster, more reliable data service. 

2. Source of Need. Air National Guard (ANG) Operational Requirements Document 002-02,

19 Feb 2001; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

201 AS JB Andrews, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 41314F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

3 Land-Based High Speed Data Systems (3010) $300,000 $900,000

1 NRE (3600) $400,000 $400,000

Total $1,300,000
120

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-40C PROCUREMENT

1. Background. The 201st Airlift Squadron (AS), District of Columbia Air National Guard 

(ANG), provides worldwide air transportation for Congressional Members and delegations, 

Executive Branch, Department of Defense officials, high-ranking US and foreign dignitaries and 

Headquarters US Air Force inspection teams. The 201 AS currently operates three C-40Cs 

(military modified Boeing 737 Business Jets). The ANG is one aircraft short of meeting 

operational requirements. A fourth aircraft will significantly improve fleet readiness and 

reliability. Scheduled maintenance and high operational tempo coupled with unscheduled 

maintenance actions will lead to cancelled flights and less availability. An additional aircraft 

will allow the unit to overlap schedules and significantly improve aircraft availability. This 

aircraft will increase airlift capability, reliability and support additional airlift requests.

2. Source of Need. Mission Need Statement National Guard Bureau 001-97, 10 Jun 1997; 

ANG Operational Requirements Document 002-02, 19 Feb 2004; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

201 AS JB Andrews, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 41314F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

1 C-40C Aircraft (3010) $103,000,000 $103,000,000

Total $103,000,000
121

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Rapid Global Mobility

C-40C CABIN REFURBISHMENT

1. Background. The 201st Airlift Squadron (AS), District of Columbia Air National Guard 

(ANG), provides worldwide air transportation for Congressional Members and delegations, 

Executive Branch, Department of Defense officials, high-ranking US and foreign dignitaries and 

Headquarters US Air Force inspection teams. Due to their age and routine operation, the C-40C 

aircraft are in need of an interior refurbishment. The C-40C interior refurbishment includes

upgraded seats, seat coverings, veneers, carpet, counter tops and an inflight entertainment 

system. These aircraft are some of the oldest within the Air Force fleet, and have not received a 

full interior refurbishment since production approximately 12 years ago.

2. Source of Need. 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted.

201 AS JB Andrews, MD

4. Program Details. PEC: 41314F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

3 Cabin Refurbishments (3010) $8,000,000 $24,000,000

Total $24,000,000
122

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
123

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

 

Guardian Angel (GA) - The Air National Guard 

(ANG) has three Guardian Angel squadrons:

103 RQS, Francis S. Gabreski Airport, NY;

131 RQS, Moffett Federal Airfield, CA; and 

212 RQS, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, AK.

Pararescue consists of Combat Rescue Officers 

and Pararescue Jumpers. Their mission is to 

recover downed and injured aircrew members in 

austere and non-permissive environments. 

Pararescue provides emergency medical 

treatment necessary to stabilize and evacuate 

injured personnel while acting in an enemyevading recovery role. 

Special Tactics (ST) - The ANG has two Special Tactics Squadrons: 

123 STS, Standiford Field, KY and 125 STS, Portland IAP, OR. Special 

Tactics teams are quick-reaction, deployable units, which are uniquely 

organized, trained and equipped to facilitate the air / ground interface 

during joint special operations and sensitive recovery missions. Special 

Tactics personnel provide quick-reaction Command and Control, Close Air 

Support, positive air traffic management, and casualty recovery, treatment 

and evacuation staging during joint air and ground / maritime operations 

including short notice, sensitive contingencies. 

Tactical Air Control Party 

(TACP) - TACP provide direct support to Army 

commanders by integrating airpower into the ground 

battle. During planning, TACP provide expert advice on 

the proper integration of air and space power at decisive 

points in the battle. During execution, TACP Joint 

Terminal Attack Controllers direct the employment of air 

and surface firepower onto enemy forces. The Air 

Support Operations Center is comprised of specially 

trained TACP for command and control of attack aircraft, 

moving assets in real time to where they are needed most.

Guardian Angel, 

Special Tactics & 

Tactical Air Control Party

Guardian Angel, Special Tactics & Tactical Air Control Party TAB N

 Personnel Recovery

 Special Operations

 ANG GA Units Provide 30% of the Total Force

 ANG ST Units Provide 25% of the Total Force

 ANG TACP Units Provide 35% of the Total Force


124

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Guardian Angel, Special Tactics & Tactical Air 

Control Party

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

Guardian Angel:

 Human Performance Optimization

 Combat Survivability Suite

 Weapons Modernization Suite

 Storage Solutions Suite

Special Tactics:

 Employment Enhancement Suite

 Dismounted Operator Suite

 Environmental Assessment Suite

 Communications Enhancement Suite

 Home Station Training Suite

Tactical Air Control Party:

 Rapidly Deployable Joint Operational 

Communications System

 Lightweight Dismounted Sensor and 

Targeting System

 Software Targeting and Data 

Management System

 Air Support Operations Center Tactical 

Data Link Control Terminal Suite

Essential Capabilities List

Guardian Angel:

 K-9 Search and Rescue

 Joint Terminal Air Controller Simulation 

Suite

 Single Pass Precision Guided Airdrop

 Signature Management Suite

Special Tactics:

 Covert Night Marking Capability

 Two Channel Voice and Data Capability

 Operator Wireless Network

 Training / Simulation of Alternate 

Insertion / Extraction Equipment

 Optimized Lightweight Dismounted 

Operator Kit

Tactical Air Control Party:

 Three Kilowatt Lightweight Generator

 Joint Terminal Air Controller Targeting 

Pod

 Tactical Air Control Party Small Arms 

Weapons Modification

 Portable Next Generation Power 

Production

Desired Capabilities List

Guardian Angel:

 Armored Vehicle

 Water Recovery Suite

 Hazardous Material Suite

 Military Navigation

Special Tactics:

 Air-Ground Two-Way Data Link

 Organic Indirect Fire Capability

 Technical Rope Rescue System

Tactical Air Control Party:

 None
125

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

GUARDIAN ANGEL HUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Guardian Angels (GA) lack progressive methods 

of regaining fitness and ensuring proper rest and rehabilitation of injuries consistent with other 

Special Operations Forces weapon systems. Injuries have a negative impact on the health and 

mission readiness of the GA Weapon System and are the primary reason for excessive lost workdays. The current medical system does not provide a detailed initial medical screening for elite 

Air Force specialists, nor does it address past injuries and structural concerns. The Human 

Performance Optimization (HPO) System will provide contracted personnel, such as a 

professional team of physical therapists, injury managers, strength coaches, nutritionists and 

physician assistants that are capable of addressing structural concerns and tracking data 

throughout the life cycle of the operator. The second part of the HPO System is procurement of 

necessary equipment for program execution. Rehabilitation, physical training, strength 

conditioning and reconditioning equipment are capabilities needed for program execution.

2. Source of Need. HPO requirement identified by the GA Senior Leaders Working Group and 

supported by the Weapon System Council; Referenced as "Sustainment" of the Force in the GA 

Vision 2020 document currently in coordination; Tactical Human Optimization, Rapid 

Rehabilitation and Reconditioning Program and current Air Force Special Operations Command 

(AFSOC) HPO program; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53119

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

3 Human Performance Optimization 

Equipment Systems (3840) $100,000 $300,000

3 Human Performance Optimization Teams 

(3840) $535,000 $1,605,000

Total $1,905,000
126

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

GUARDIAN ANGEL COMBAT SURVIVABILITY SUITE

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Guardian Angel (GA) missions demand agile 

combat capability to defeat conventional and guerrilla-style threats in a broad range of 

environments. Lessons learned show that in prosecution of the GA mission, it is extremely 

difficult for the operator to determine the direction of incoming fire. To alleviate this constraint, 

a lightweight, man-portable Hostile Fire Indicator (HFI) is essential. Similarly, the proliferation 

of Global Positioning System (GPS) denial systems require enhanced equipment that is less 

susceptible to jamming and is capable of providing improved navigation accuracy in both 

mounted and dismounted applications. Additionally, the GA must possess the capability to see 

into areas of reduced visibility (low ambient light, fog, smog or concealment measures). A 

fusion goggle that operates day or night, incorporates thermal and Night Vision Goggle (NVG)

technology, and gives the operator “heads-up” information such as distance and bearing to a 

select objective fulfills this capability gap. GA success on the battlefield depends heavily on the 

ability to designate threats for supporting parties. A handheld day / night target designator is 

essential. Acquisition of a lightweight and compact communication system, capable of 

delivering voice and high-speed data in both line-of-sight and over-the-horizon while on the 

move, dramatically improves GA capability. Ground rescue vehicles are needed to ensure 

Pararescue Jumpers can respond quickly and survive over-land rescue scenarios. The Guardian 

Angel mission continues to evolve creating new requirements that burden airmen with weight 

and complexity.

2. Source of Need. Lessons Learned from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) and 

IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF); Mission Required Equipment Shortfalls identified in the Guardian 

Angel Modernization Initial Capabilities Document and the GA Capabilities-Based Assessment 

(CBA) Final Report; 2010-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53119

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

150 Fusion Goggles (3080) $32,000 $4,800,000

30 HFI (3080) $1,800 $54,000

150 Invisio V60 (3080) $2,000 $300,000

54 MicroDAGR (3080) $1,450 $78,300

36 Night / Day Target Designators (3080) $18,500 $666,000

73 AN PVS-31 Binocular Night Vision Devices

(3080) $10,000 $730,000

3 Tactical Tablets (3080) $32,000 $96,000

Total $6,724,300
127

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

GUARDIAN ANGEL WEAPONS MODERNIZATION SUITE

1. Background. Guardian Angels (GA) require a simple, versatile and long-range weapon for 

the defense of personnel and mission objectives against an entrenched enemy when Close Air 

Support (CAS) is not available. GAs need the capability to control crowds and unknown 

hostiles, and hold them at an ineffective and safe distance from an incident site. Lessons learned 

from Operation ENDURING FREEDOM highlighted the need for improvements to current GA 

outdated weapons capabilities (lethal and non-lethal) which would greatly improve the 

probability of mission success. The current 9 mm weapon is heavy and has insufficient stopping 

power for personal defense, as well as a heavy trigger-pull which reduces accuracy. 

Additionally, the components easily corrode. A modification or replacement of the 9 mm is 

required. The US Army determined the M-4 does not need replacement. This drives the need to 

modernize the M-4. The M-4 has an unacceptable malfunction rate of one failure in every 

5,000 rounds fired. Modifications could improve malfunction rates to one failure in every 

50,000 rounds. Lastly, GAs require the resources to train consistently on current weapons which 

will greatly enhance their successful employment. Training quality and quantity could be 

substantially improved with the purchase of suitable multi-lane 25-meter ranges.

2. Source of Need. Lessons Learned from Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) and 

IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF); Mission Required Equipment Shortfalls identified in the Guardian 

Angel Modernization Initial Capabilities Document and the GA Capabilities-Based Assessment

(CBA) Final Report; ARC 2012-2013 WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53119

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

150 M-4 Modernization (3080) $2,370 $355,500

150 M-9 Modernization (3080) $550 $82,500

11 Multi-Role Stand-Off Systems (3080) $28,000 $308,000

11 Non-Lethal Weapons (3080) $12,500 $137,500

3 Combat Shooting Trainers (3080) $4,000,000 $12,000,000

Total $12,883,500
128

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

GUARDIAN ANGEL STORAGE SOLUTIONS SUITE

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Guardian Angels (GA) have inadequate space and 

access to mission critical equipment. Growth of mission requirements over the past decade 

resulted in additional mission equipment without an increase in storage capacity. Currently, GAs

must procure temporary storage facilities to prevent damage to mission critical gear stored 

outside. GAs can partially address the storage deficiency by purchasing space saver equipment 

for existing facilities. Better use of existing facilities in concert with procurement of temporary 

shelters protects and provides acceptable access to mission critical equipment. 

2. Source of Need. Identified by the GA Senior Leaders Working Group and supported by the 

Weapon System Council; Wing Commanders identified this as a critical need; 2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53119

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

3 Temporary Climate Controlled Facilities 

(3080) $535,000 $1,605,000

3 Multiple Storage Solutions (3080) $200,000 $600,000

Total $2,205,000
129

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

SPECIAL TACTICS EMPLOYMENT ENHANCEMENT SUITE 

1. Background. Special Tactics Squadron (STS) operators require reliable tactical vehicles and 

watercraft to conduct contingency and domestic missions. Maritime Support Boats need to be 

larger, more seaworthy and reliable with a heated cabin capable of supporting lifesaving 

emergency operations in the case of an injured jumper. The Maritime Forward-Looking Infrared

system will greatly enhance safety by enabling rapid detection and marking the location of 

personnel in the water. Replacement of aging small swift-water boats permits STS to safely 

conduct reconnaissance and recovery operations in fast moving waters. Microfly devices allow 

precise Global Positioning System-guided deployment of cargo utilizing existing personnel 

parachutes. These devices relieve the burden placed on the parachutists to attach the bundle to 

their bodies. Additionally, Battlefield Airmen currently utilize small All-Terrain Vehicles 

(ATV) to conduct ground transportation in remote environments. These ATVs suffer from a low 

cargo capability and minimal range; and are extremely terrain limited. A vehicle capable of 

transporting a minimum of two personnel plus equipment over extremely rugged terrain is 

urgently required. New snow machine trailers are required to transport snow machines by 

aircraft or vehicle. There is a critical shortage of storage space to support the employment 

enhancement equipment. An Individual Storage Unit (ISU) organizational system will ensure 

there is adequate space to store equipment.

2. Source of Need. Lessons Learned from Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF); Air 

Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC)/A5KB and US Air Force Battlefield Airman 

Requirements Working Group; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

123 STS Louisville IAP, KY 125 STS Portland IAP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 53130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

2 ISU Organization Systems (3080) $100,000 $200,000

8 ATV Track Systems (3080) $10,000 $80,000

2 Maritime FLIR Mounting Systems (3080) $300,000 $600,000

1 Maritime Support Boat (3080) $300,000 $300,000

2 Search and Rescue Tactical Vehicles (3080) $250,000 $500,000

2 Swift-Water Boats (3080) $13,000 $26,000

2 C-130 ECW Trailers (3080) $6,000 $12,000

2 Microfly Parachute Devices (3080) $28,500 $57,000

Total $1,769,000
130

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

SPECIAL TACTICS DISMOUNTED OPERATOR SUITE

1. Background. Special Tactics Squadron (STS) operators require the lightest, most accurate 

and easiest to use gear available. This suite provides a single lightweight system to increase 

lethality on the battlefield by first using personal weapons and then gaining situational awareness 

to quickly bring precise airpower to bear on the enemy while avoiding fratricide. Capabilities of 

the components are complementary and interoperable throughout the entire STS mission set in 

wartime and domestic operations. The package includes a small tactical information display 

with tablet, a Video Down Link receiver, Laser Target Designators, Laser Range Finders, 

Satellite Communications Antennas and Night Vision Devices. The Night Vision Devices will 

include hands free optics, a wireless interface between night vision devices and peripherals, and 

weapon accessories.

2. Source of Need. Lessons Learned from Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF); Air 

Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC)/A5KB and US Air Force Battlefield Airman 

Requirements Working Group; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

123 STS Louisville IAP, KY 125 STS Portland IAP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 53130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

10 Situational Awareness Tablets (3080) $10,000 $100,000

25 Video Down Links (3080) $30,000 $750,000

6 Laser Target Designators (3080) $15,000 $90,000

20 Night Vision Devices (3080) $12,000 $240,000

30 NexGen Small Laser Range Finders (3080) $8,500 $255,000

10 ManPack SATCOM Antennas (3080) $5,000 $50,000

Total $1,485,000
131

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

SPECIAL TACTICS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SUITE 

1. Background. Special Tactics Squadrons (STS) require updated, lightweight and easy to 

operate assault zone equipment. Procurement of Landing Zone (LZ) assessment equipment, 

riverine analysis kits and atmospheric sounding kits will enable STS operators to conduct vital 

reconnaissance missions and with far greater accuracy, efficiency and safety. Furthermore, 

operations in and around natural disasters have highlighted current Search and Rescue (SAR) 

technique limitations that are often inaccurate in locating survivors and extremely labor 

intensive. Procuring canines to assist SAR operations during natural disasters is paramount for 

mission success.

2. Source of Need. Lessons Learned from Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF); Air 

Force Special Forces Command (AFSOC)/A5KB and US Air Force Battlefield Airman 

Requirements Working Group; ARC 2013 WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

123 STS Louisville IAP, KY 125 STS Portland IAP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 53130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

11 LZ Assessment Modular Upgrades (3080) $25,000 $275,000

12 Riverine Analysis Kits (3080) $3,300 $39,600

6 Tactical Atmospheric Sounding Kits (3080) $21,000 $126,000

100 High Visibility Domestic Operations 

Protective Combat Uniforms (3080) $1,500 $150,000

1 Search and Rescue Canine (3080) $80,000 $80,000

Total $670,600
132

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

SPECIAL TACTICS COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT SUITE

1. Background. Special Tactics Squadrons (STS) consist of Combat Control Teams, 

Pararescue Teams and Special Operations Weather Teams. The teams must communicate 

Command and Control (C2) information to a variety of assets on the battlefield and in Domestic 

Operations (DOMOPS) via both line-of-sight (LOS) and beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) mediums. 

Critical C2 data and voice transmissions must be clear, while the equipment must be lightweight, 

durable and easy to operate. The communications enhancement suite allows operators to 

communicate more effectively in austere and maritime environments through LOS and Satellite 

Communication radios with all military and US emergency responders. Procurement of 

enhanced communications equipment includes antennas, power systems, global rapid response 

devices, remote control units and test systems. This equipment will enable STS operators to 

safely conduct their vital missions in any environment with far greater efficiency.

2. Source of Need. Lessons Learned from Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF); Air 

Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC)/A5KB and US Air Force Battlefield Airman 

Requirements Working Group; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

123 STS Louisville IAP, KY 125 STS Portland IAP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 53130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

2 High-Bandwidth SATCOM Antennas (3080) $5,000 $10,000

2 Power Solution Systems (3080) $6,000 $12,000

3 Global Rapid Response Devices (3080) $50,000 $150,000

3 Digital Radio Test Sets (3080) $50,000 $150,000

3 Tactical Radio Test Systems (3080) $16,000 $48,000

4 RF Remote Controls (3080) $12,000 $48,000

4 VHF 108-174 MHz Antennas (3080) $500 $2,000

4 UHF 225-400 MHz Antennas (3080) $500 $2,000

Total $422,000
133

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Special Operations / Personnel Recovery

SPECIAL TACTICS HOME STATION TRAINING SUITE 

1. Background. The sustainment of the personnel force has become a high visibility issue 

within the Special Operations community. The importance of this is highlighted by the Special 

Operations Command (SOCOM) Tactical Human Optimization, Rapid Rehabilitation and 

Reconditioning (THOR3) Program and the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) 

Human Performance Program (HPP). These programs placed subject matter experts at each of 

the Air National Guard (ANG) Special Tactics Squadrons (STS) as well as new physical 

conditioning equipment with a focus on combat readiness. However, equipment shortfalls 

created a training suite capability gap. The equipment shortfall consists of training turf, a 

hydrotherapy system and a high angle training wall. Additionally, the influx of personnel and 

equipment requires storage capability to properly house and utilize new assets and equipment to 

include the ANG Advanced Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) Training System (AAJTS) 

simulator.

2. Source of Need. THOR3 Program; Human Performance Program; 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

123 STS Louisville IAP, KY 125 STS Portland IAP, OR

4. Program Details. PEC: 53130

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

2 Temporary Storage Facilities (3080) $150,000 $300,000

2 AAJTS Open Storage (3080) $800,000 $1,600,000

2 Movement Training Turfs (3080) $50,000 $100,000

1 Hydrotherapy System (3080) $20,000 $20,000

1 Indoor High Angle Training Wall (3080) $200,000 $200,000

Total $2,220,000
134

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY RAPIDLY DEPLOYABLE JOINT 

OPERATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM

1. Background. The legacy Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) vehicular communications 

system is unsustainable, unreliable and forces operators to rely upon non-amplified man-portable 

communication systems. An integrated radio suite providing modern amplified multi-band and 

High Frequency (HF) radios is required to ensure mission critical communication with tactical 

and disaster response agencies. The capability integrates multiple radios into one control rack 

and is powered from any external source. Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC) are in an 

ever-evolving communication-intensive operating environment under direct combat conditions 

where an improved communication system is needed. This capability provides persistent 

communications with aircraft and other remote sites in a non-permissive environment.

2. Source of Need. Air Combat Command (ACC) TACP Requirements Working Group and 

LOGDET Review validated requirement; Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) PreSolicitation reference number R1550; Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) request for solutions 

solicitation number BAA-RWK-10-0003; Lessons Learned from Operations ENDURING 

FREEDOM (OEF) and IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF); 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 138 CTF Camp Gruber, OK 169 ASOS Peoria IAP, IL

113 ASOS Terre Haute IAP, IN 146 ASOS Will Rodgers WAP, OK 227 ASOS Atlantic City IAP, NJ

116 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 147 ASOS Ellington IAP, TX 238 ASOS Meridian RAP, MS

118 ASOS New London, NC 148 ASOS Ft Indiantown Gap, PA 274 ASOS Syracuse Hancock IAP, NY

122 ASOS Camp Beauregard, LA 165 ASOS Garden City, GA 284 ASOS Smoky Hill, KS

124 ASOS Boise AP, ID 168 ASOS Peoria IAP, IL

4. Program Details. PEC: 52671

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

271 JTAC Vehicle Communication Systems

(3080) $183,400 $49,701,400

Total $49,701,400
135

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY LIGHTWEIGHT DISMOUNTED SENSOR AND 

TARGETING SYSTEM

1. Background. Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC) must carry multiple single-use 

function devices to provide ranging, covert marking, designating and detection. Simultaneous 

use of these devices is prohibitive due to their capability, weight, size and power limitations. 

JTACs need a combined Laser Target Marker, Laser Target Designator and Laser Range Finder 

(LRF) with the capability to identify and designate a tank-sized target at distances greater than 

2 kilometers and the ability to mark greater than 3 kilometers. Additionally, the capability to 

visually locate pulse-coded frequency lasers is needed to confirm aircraft-based lasers track the 

same targets ground forces designate or mark. Current JTAC sensor and targeting solutions are 

tied to equipment which requires numerous cables for connectivity. A secure Wireless Personal 

Area Network (WPAN) would increase the combat capability of JTACs while decreasing weight 

and potential for equipment failure.

2. Source of Need. Air Combat Command (ACC) Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) 

Requirements Working Group validated requirement; Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL)

request for solutions solicitation number BAA-RWK-10-0003; Air Force Materiel Command 

(AFMC) Request for Proposal solicitation number TACPCASS061512; Lessons Learned from 

Operations IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) and ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF); 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 138 CTF Camp Gruber, OK 169 ASOS Peoria IAP, IL

113 ASOS Terre Haute IAP, IN 146 ASOS Will Rodgers WAP, OK 227 ASOS Atlantic City IAP, NJ

116 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 147 ASOS Ellington IAP, TX 238 ASOS Meridian RAP, MS

118 ASOS New London, NC 148 ASOS Ft Indiantown Gap, PA 274 ASOS Syracuse Hancock IAP, NY

122 ASOS Camp Beauregard, LA 165 ASOS Garden City, GA 284 ASOS Smoky Hill, KS

124 ASOS Boise AP, ID 168 ASOS Peoria IAP, IL

4. Program Details. PEC: 52671

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

252 TACP Day / Night Coded Spot Trackers 

(3080) $60,000 $15,120,000

252 Lightweight Range Mark Designators

(3080) $86,000 $21,672,000

340 JTAC WPAN Capabilities (3080) $15,000 $5,100,000

Total $41,892,000
136

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY SOFTWARE TARGETING AND DATA 

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

1. Background. Dismounted Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC) lack a lightweight 

integrated solution capable of sharing targeting data with a wide range of Close Air Support 

(CAS) aircraft. JTACs need the capability to simultaneously operate geospatial mapping, 

navigation, and precision targeting software with the option to provide direct, near real-time 

connectivity with supporting aircraft and ground forces. These capabilities will shorten the kill 

chain timeline and help mitigate collateral damage and fratricide. JTACs require software and 

lightweight man-portable hardware solutions optimized for the human machine interface 

requirements of the battlefield. The current Digitally Aided CAS software of record was 

designed for use by Command and Control agencies on desktop computers, and is not useable on 

small form factor, touch screen devices. A JTAC-centric capability requires transmission of 

timely and accurate targeting solutions directly to airborne platforms without requiring beyond 

line-of-sight communications through a remote gateway. Enhanced sharing of targeting data and 

situational awareness dramatically decreases voice communications and target misidentification, 

while expediting accurate kinetic strikes on known targets.

2. Source of Need. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) request for solutions solicitation 

number BAA-RWK-10-0003; Lessons Learned from Operations IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) and 

ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF); Urgent Operational Need from OEF; 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 138 CTF Camp Gruber, OK 169 ASOS Peoria IAP, IL

113 ASOS Terre Haute IAP, IN 146 ASOS Will Rodgers WAP, OK 227 ASOS Atlantic City IAP, NJ

116 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 147 ASOS Ellington IAP, TX 238 ASOS Meridian RAP, MS

118 ASOS New London, NC 148 ASOS Ft Indiantown Gap, PA 274 ASOS Syracuse Hancock IAP, NY

122 ASOS Camp Beauregard, LA 165 ASOS Garden City, GA 284 ASOS Smoky Hill, KS

124 ASOS Boise AP , ID 168 ASOS Peoria IAP, IL

4. Program Details. PEC: 52671

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

140 JTAC Dismount Computer Kits (3080) $28,000 $3,920,000

180 Targeting Pod Based Data Links (3080) $60,000 $10,800,000

220 JTAC Targeting Software Kits (3080) $10,000 $2,200,000

Total $16,920,000
137

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Command and Control

TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS CENTER 

TACTICAL DATA LINK CONTROL TERMINAL SUITE

1. Background. Air Support Operations Centers (ASOC) serve as the principal air control 

agency of the Theater Air Control System (TACS), and are responsible for the direction and 

control of air operations supporting the ground combat element. They process and coordinate 

requests for immediate air support, and coordinate air missions requiring integration with other 

supporting air and ground forces. They normally co-locate with the US Army tactical 

headquarters senior Fire Support Coordination Center within the ground combat element. The 

ASOCs aid with long-haul voice and data communications and serve as the primary link between 

Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC) and airborne assets. The ASOCs lack a lightweight, 

transportable, tactical network suite capable of linking JTACs, aircrews and senior echelons in 

the TACS. This tactical network should include three routers, three switches and crypto to 

facilitate both classified and unclassified transmissions. The capability needs a Voice Over 

Internet Protocol (VOIP) server and VOIP phones to support voice demand and support a 

minimum bandwidth of 5 Mbps. 

2. Source of Need. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) request for solutions solicitation 

number BAA-RWK-10-0003; US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) sponsored 

recommendation for deployable Command, Control, Communications, Computers and 

Intelligence (C4I) requirements; Lessons Learned from Operations IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) and 

ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF); 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 168 ASOS Peoria, IL

4. Program Details. PEC: 52671

 

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

2 Tactical Network Suites (3080) $980,000 $1,960,000

Total $1,960,000
138

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
139

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

MQ-1 Predator Remotely Piloted Aircraft - The 

MQ-1 Predator is a medium-altitude, long 

endurance Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) system. 

The primary MQ-1 mission is to act as an 

Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR)

asset, employing sensors to provide real-time data to 

commanders and intelligence specialists at all 

levels. The MQ-1 conducts interdiction and armed 

reconnaissance with a system integrating ElectroOptical / Infrared (EO/IR) laser designator and laser 

illuminator into a single sensor package. The aircraft can employ two laser-guided AGM-114 

Hellfire missiles. Additionally, the MQ-1 is a theater asset for reconnaissance, surveillance and 

target acquisition organic to the Joint Force Air Component Commander’s (JFACC) forces. The 

MQ-1 Predator is flown by ND, AZ, TX, OH and CA Air National Guard (ANG) units. The NV

ANG supports active duty MQ-1 operational and training sorties.

MQ-9 Reaper Remotely Piloted Aircraft - The MQ-9 Reaper is a medium-to-high altitude, 

long-endurance RPA system. Because of its robust weapons payload capacity and long 

endurance on-station times, the primary MQ-9 mission is hunter-killer operations against 

emerging targets. The secondary MQ-9 mission is to act as an ISR asset, employing sensors to 

provide real-time data to commanders and intelligence specialists at all levels. The MQ-9 

Reaper is designed to prosecute time-sensitive targets using its capabilities of precision targeting 

and long endurance to find, fix and destroy or disable those targets. The MQ-9 Reaper is flown 

by AR, IA, MI, NY, PA and TN Air National Guard units. The NV ANG supports active duty 

MQ-9 operational and training sorties.

 Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance 

 Air Interdiction / Armed Reconnaissance

 Close Air Support to Ground Forces

 ANG MQ-1 / MQ-9 Units Provide 18% of the Total Fleet

MQ-1 & MQ-9

MQ-1 & MQ-9 TAB O
140

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

MQ-1 & MQ-9

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

 Integrated Communications Suite

 High Speed Exploitation Support Data

 Rapid, Robust Data Transfer and Sharing

 Virtual Collaboration Mission Execution Framework

Essential Capabilities List

 Sense and Avoid for Operations in the National Airspace System and International Civil 

Aviation Organization Airspace

 Rapid Reaction Package

 Imminent Threat Warning and Targeting

 High Definition Multi-Spectral Targeting System with Directed Energy CounterCountermeasures, Laser Spot Search and Track, Moving Target Indicators, and Improved 

Video Tracks

 Weapons Simulate Mode 

Desired Capabilities List

 Improved Electronic Protection for Global Positioning Systems Operations in a Denied, 

Deceived or Degraded Environment

 Onboard Link Equipment

 Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Export

 Airborne C-Band Repeater

 Multi-Spectral Targeting System Image Geo-Registration and Overlay
141

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

MQ-1/MQ-9 INTEGRATED COMMUNICATIONS SUITE

1. Background. MQ-1/MQ-9 aircraft lack sufficient means to establish and maintain 

communications with Command and Control (C2) and tactical agencies in the Area of 

Responsibility (AOR). Line-of-sight (LOS) voice communication is limited to a single 

ARC-210 radio and the connectivity of the Ground Control Station (GCS) enabling use of offboard, beyond line-of-sight (BLOS) voice capabilities such as Defense Switching Network 

(DSN), Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP), and Radio Over Internet Protocol (ROIP). These 

systems are stand-alone and often require simultaneous operations during mission execution. 

MQ-1/MQ-9 operators require an integrated, expandable, multi-level secure communications 

capability for the current and future fight, which will involve both domestic and overseas 

operations with a variety of partners at multiple classification levels. The capability must 

include provisions for clear, consistent, reliable and timely communications across all enclaves. 

It should consist of a single interface and a single-point reception and transmission capability, 

integrating inter- and intra-GCS communication, intelligence personnel, aircraft ARC-210, and 

GCS DSN and IP-based voice systems.

2. Source of Need. Capability Production Document (CPD) for MQ-9 HUNTER-KILLER 

paragraph 14c(2)(c), 8 Aug 2006; Air Force Central Command (AFCENT) Urgent Operational 

Need (UON) Combat Air Forces (CAF) 301-12, 17 Feb 2012; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

118 AW Nashville IAP, TN 163 RW March ARB, CA 178 FW Springfield MAP, OH

119 WG Hector IAP, ND 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY 214 RS Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ

147 RW Ellington IAP, TX

4. Program Details. PEC: 53219F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 GCS Intercom NRE (3600) $2,100,000 $2,100,000

23 GCS Intercom Mod Suites (3080) $600,000 $13,800,000

Total $15,900,000
142

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

MQ-1/MQ-9 HIGH SPEED EXPLOITATION SUPPORT DATA

1. Background. Exploitation Support Data (ESD) is the telemetry stream from the Remotely 

Piloted Aircraft (RPA) that informs essential situational awareness and warfighting displays in 

both the Squadron Operations Center (SOC) and Ground Control Station (GCS). Current ESD is 

parceled externally at 0.3 Hz, or once every three seconds. This results in aircraft positional 

updates that are relatively slow and choppy in tactical displays. High Speed ESD (HS ESD) 

involves simple hardware modifications that increase this sample rate to 20 Hz, creating a 

600 percent improvement in aircraft and Sensor Point of Interest (SPI) refresh rate. This further 

enables automation of several essential warfighting tools including Hellfire Missile Impact Tool 

and Skynet. It also supports off-board threat warning systems crucial to increasing survivability 

in contested environments, as well as geo-registration of the Full Motion Video (FMV) in 

Processing, Exploitation and Dissemination (PED) software such as Catalina 2d3. Higher 

positional refresh rates mean higher fidelity navigational data, a key part of operating in the 

National Airspace System (NAS) for Domestic Operations (DOMOPS). The 556th Test and 

Evaluation Squadron (TES), along with the New York Air National Guard (ANG) at Syracuse, 

have been successfully operating with HS ESD for the last 3 years.

2. Source of Need. 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

118 AW Nashville IAP, TN 163 RW March ARB, CA 178 FW Springfield MAP, OH

119 WG Hector IAP, ND 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY 214 RS Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ

147 RW Ellington IAP, TX

4. Program Details. PEC: 53219F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

18 High Speed ESD Suites (3080) $117,000 $2,106,000

Total $2,106,000
143

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

MQ-1/MQ-9 RAPID, ROBUST DATA TRANSFER AND SHARING

1. Background. Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) crews require a universally accessible, large 

bandwidth, multi-domain server to provide rapid access to mission-essential information. RPA 

squadrons have amassed a significant amount of locally stored intelligence data, after action 

reports, and training products during the past 12+ years and 2,000,000 hours of continuous 

combat operations. Squadron archives are overflowing with information that remains largely 

unshared because most items, especially Full Motion Video (FMV) footage, are typically too 

large to share across the community via conventional means. The Air National Guard (ANG) 

MQ-1/MQ-9 RPAs need an effective electronic medium for the storage, access and 

dissemination of information across local networks.

2. Source of Need. Capability Development Document (CDD) 6.1.8 and 8.0; TRI-MAJCOM 

SOC Requirement Working Group; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

118 AW Nashville IAP, TN 163 RW March ARB, CA 178 FW Springfield MAP, OH

119 WG Hector IAP, ND 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY 214 RS Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ

147 RW Ellington IAP, TX

4. Program Details. PEC: 53219F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost 

7 Data Transfer Systems (3080) $200,000 $1,400,000

Total $1,400,000
144

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Global Integrated Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance

MQ-1/MQ-9 VIRTUAL COLLABORATION MISSION EXECUTION FRAMEWORK

1. Background. The ability for aircrew and intelligence personnel to gain and maintain 

situational awareness in today’s rapidly evolving battlespace hinges on a robust, redundant and 

flexible digital network architecture. The MQ-1/MQ-9 enterprise currently lacks a multi-level, 

collaborative, fused framework that effectively supports the warfighter. The fusion, 

synchronization and simultaneous access of real-time voice, video and data are often the 

difference between mission success and failure. The inability of our current tactical display 

framework to present, share, transfer and filter mission-critical data creates a potential and often 

realized weakness for today’s most requested combat asset. The framework must be a real-time, 

dynamic, collaborative data fusion architecture, combining SIRIS, Zeus, Cursor-on-Target, 

Google EarthTM, and other mission execution tools. It must allow full access to all information 

by aircrew, exploiters, supported units and potential Higher Headquarters (HHQ) decision 

makers. This system should be accessible via the Global Information Grid (GIG) from austere 

locations with limited bandwidth or connectivity. This system must be Unmanned Aerial System 

Command and Control Initiative (UCI) compliant and provide development potential to meet 

emerging needs.

2. Source of Need. US Army Special Operations Command (ARSOC) Capability Development 

Document (CDD); ARC 2008-2010; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

118 AW Nashville IAP, TN 163 RW March ARB, CA 178 FW Springfield IAP, OH

119 WG Hector IAP, ND 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY 214 RS Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ

147 RW Ellington IAP, TX

4. Program Details. PEC: 53219F 

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 Virtual Collaborative Execution Tool (3080) $2,400,000 $2,400,000

Total $2,400,000
145

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Innovation and agile technology integration are hallmarks of the Air National Guard’s (ANG) 

program of squadron-level simulators and trainers to meet specific warfighter requirements. The 

devices span the spectrum from very high fidelity to a family 

of trainers and micro simulators. As part of the ANG’s “fly 

before you buy” policy, both flight and mission crew 

simulator proofs of concept are constructed in partnership 

with government technology development centers and 

industry. Production decisions are made only after thorough 

operational testing. This approach ensures that deployment

decisions are made only after evaluation by ANG subject 

matter experts, resulting in reduced risk, cost and schedule.

Current major programs include the KC-135 Boom 

Operator Simulation System (BOSS) in cooperation 

with the Army’s Program Executive Office, Simulation, 

Training and Instrumentation; the ANG Advanced Joint 

Terminal Air Controllers (JTAC) Training System 

(AAJTS); C-130 Multi-Mission Crew Trainer 

(MMCT); and the next generation F-16C Full Mission 

Trainer (FMT). Aircrew Procedures Trainers (APT) include the HH-60, RC-26 and MQ-9. 

Live-Virtual-Constructive architectures supported by Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) 

remains a baseline component of all ANG training systems. The Distributed Training Operations 

Center (DTOC), 132 FW Detachment 1, provides the operational environment for DMO by 

linking a wide array of flight and mission crew simulators at ANG, Air Force Reserve Command 

(AFRC), active duty Air Force and other Service operational simulator sites. 

The ANG has invested significant resources to 

continuously modernize equipment and infrastructure to 

support all current weapons systems in the Department of 

Defense (DOD) inventory. As new weapons systems are 

delivered, such as the F-22, F-35, the Joint Direct Attack 

Munitions (JDAM), improved Precision Guided Munitions 

(PGM), airborne lasers, Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) 

and Information Warfare (IW), range modernization must 

keep pace. The constant evolution of these technologies 

requires new training space, equipment, infrastructure and 

instrumentation to evolve and remain relevant.

 Advanced Simulator Development

 Operational Training Environments

Simulation, Distributed 

Mission Operations & Range 

Instrumentation

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations & Range Instrumentation TAB P
146

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations & Range 

Instrumentation

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference *

Critical Capabilities List

Simulation and Distributed Mission 

Operations:

 Air National Guard Advanced Joint 

Terminal Attack Controller Training System 

 Battle Control Center Multi-Level Security 

Distributed Mission Operations Mission 

Training Center

 Control and Reporting Center Deployable 

Mission Simulation Training Support 

Systems

 EC-130J Simulator Training Devices

 MQ-1/MQ-9 Distributed Mission 

Operations Capable Simulator Connectivity 

with the Distributed Training Operations 

Center

 Air and Space Operations Center Joint 

Range Extension with Joint Distributed 

Operational Training System

 Guardian Angel Full Spectrum Capabilities

 Distributed Common Ground System with 

Fully Integrated Suite of Distributed 

Training Operations Center Equipment, 

Software and Connectivity

Range Instrumentation:

 High-Fidelity Surrogate Targets

 Mobile High-Fidelity Threat Simulators

 Communications and Tactical Data Link 

Architecture Support

 Joint Advanced Weapon Scoring System

 “Rangeless” Air Combat Maneuvering 

Instrumentation

Essential Capabilities List

Simulation and Distributed Mission 

Operations:

 Combat Air Force: Air Reserve Component 

Network

 Joint Terminal Attack Controller Simulation

 Distributed Mission Operations and Training 

Capability for HC/MC-130

 Distributed Mission Operations-Capable 

HH-60H Aircraft Simulator

 Special Tactics Training / Simulation 

Alternate Insertion and Extraction Tower

Range Instrumentation:

 Infrared Man-Portable Air Defense Systems 

Threat Simulators 

 Global Positioning System Ground Target 

and Safety Tracking

 Joint Terminal Attack Controller Training 

Simulation

Desired Capabilities List

Simulation and Distributed Mission 

Operations:

 KC-135R Advanced Squadron Level 

Simulator Systems

 RC-26 Simulator

Range Instrumentation:

 Global Positional System Jamming 

Capability

 Remotely Piloted Aircraft Operations and 

Support

 Surrogate Remotely Piloted Aircraft Support

* Note: Simulation and Distributed Mission Operations did not have a separate breakout session at the ARC 2013 

WEPTAC. The ANG Range Council met prior to WEPTAC to determine capability requirements. Capabilities are 

extracted from the referenced weapon system Tab and consolidated in this Tab for clarity.
147

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION AIR NATIONAL GUARD ADVANCED JOINT TERMINAL ATTACK 

CONTROLLER TRAINING SYSTEM

1. Background. Joint Terminal Air Controllers (JTAC), at both Air Support Operations 

Squadrons (ASOS) and Special Tactics Squadrons (STS), operate simulators with very limited 

training capability. The Air National Guard (ANG) JTAC Training System (AAJTS) was 

developed in partnership with industry to rapidly field a robust, high-fidelity, immersive 

simulator. Training requirements are rapidly approaching the point where the lack of live-fly air 

assets will reduce the JTAC’s ability to maintain Combat Mission Ready (CMR) training 

requirements. AAJTS provides a simulator at each squadron with both stand-alone and 

Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) capabilities. This simulation system consists of a multichannel visual display system including image generators, screens and projectors; a robust 

Instructor Operating Station (IOS) with scenario generation capability; high resolution visual 

models and terrain databases; and associated hardware and software. The IOS, including a role 

player station, includes functionality to access both virtual and constructive forces to facilitate 

the configuration of environment generation capabilities required for stand-alone event control. 

Follow-on Preplanned Product Improvements (P3I) will add additional capabilities including a 

two-position Tactical Operations Center (TOC), additional visual databases and emulators. Due 

to delays in fielding the Air Force Program of Record, the ANG, with support from other 

commands, initiated an interim program to equip ANG ASOS and STS with the AAJTS and 

funded 10 AAJTS out of a total requirement for 17 for fielding in FY14. Funding for the 

remaining quantity required is listed below.

2. Source of Need. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 13-112v1 Joint Terminal Attack Controller 

Training Program; AFI 13-114v1 Air Support Operations Center Training Program; 2012-2013 

ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

111 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 146 ASOS Will Rogers WAP, OK 227 ASOS Atlantic City IAP, NJ

113 ASOS Terre Haute IAP, IN 147 ASOS Ellington IAP, TX 238 ASOS Meridian RAP, MS

116 ASOS Camp Murray, WA 148 ASOS Ft Indiantown Gap, PA 274 ASOS Syracuse IAP, NY

118 ASOS New London, NC 165 ASOS Garden City, GA 284 ASOS Smoky Hill, KS

122 ASOS Camp Beauregard, LA 168 ASOS Peoria IAP, IL 902 MSG/TD Randolph AFB TX

124 ASOS Boise AP, ID 169 ASOS Peoria IAP, IL

4. Program Details. PEC: 52671

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

7 AAJTS (3080) $2,258,000 $15,806,000

1 Non Recurring Integration (3080) $650,000 $650,000

Total $16,456,000
148

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION BATTLE CONTROL CENTER MULTI-LEVEL SECURITY 

DISTRIBUTED MISSION OPERATIONS MISSION TRAINING CENTER 

1. Background. Battle Control Centers (BCC) operating in the North American Aerospace 

Defense Command (NORAD) area of operations require the capability to train and integrate into

the Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) environment to achieve and maintain combat mission 

readiness with fourth and fifth generation fighters. BCCs require an initial proof of concept to 

connect and train to current Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) at appropriate classification 

levels. Currently, there is no way for BCCs to fully train with all fourth and fifth generation 

fighter capabilities. In the long term, it is mandatory for BCCs to train at current facilities while 

able to fully manage all fighter and future platforms. This long term vision of “multi-level 

security” DMO will allow mission planning, briefing, mission execution and debriefing. In the 

interim, efforts are aimed at providing relevant training to include installing appropriate DMO 

connections and the ability to brief, video teleconference, provide command and control, and 

debrief pilots via Air Reserve Component Network (ARCNet) and the Distributed Training 

Operations Center (DTOC). This initial proof of concept of DMO is a critical step for BCCs to 

explore the full potential of LVC Mission Training Centers and the future of Total Force 

Integration. 

2. Source of Need. Department of Defense Directive (DODD) 1322.18 Military Training; Air 

Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2251 Management of Air Force Training Systems; Contingency Plan 

(CONPLAN) 3310-12 Aerospace Defense and Maritime Warning; 2011-2013 ARC WEPTAC 

Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

169 ACWS Wheeler AAF, HI 176 ADS Joint Base Elmendorf, AK

EADS Rome, NY WADS Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA

4. Program Details. PEC: 51311F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

3 BC-3/T (EADS, WADS, HI) (3080) $425,000 $1,275,000

6 Work Stations (EADS, WADS, HI) (3840) $5,000 $30,000

3 ARCNet Gateways (EADS, WADS, HI) (3840) $15,000 $45,000

4 T1 Lines (EADS, WADS, HI, AK) (3840) $4,200 $16,800

3 Plexsys ASCOT (EADS, WADS, HI) (3080) $300,000 $900,000

3 VTC (EADS, WADS, HI) (3840) $10,000 $30,000

6 Desktop PCs (EADS, WADS, HI) (3840) $6,000 $36,000

Total $2,296,836
149

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER DEPLOYABLE 

MISSION SIMULATION TRAINING SUPPORT SYSTEMS

1. Background. The Control and Reporting Center (CRC) integrates a comprehensive air 

picture via multiple data links from air-, sea-, and land-based sensors, as well as from its 

embedded surveillance and control radars. It performs decentralized Command and Control 

(C2) of joint operations by conducting threat warning, battle management, theater missile

defense, weapons control, combat identification, and strategic communications. Simulation and 

well-scripted training events are a critical part of the training required to meet these mission 

crew capabilities. The organic CRC simulation system is not able to simulate Higher

Headquarters (HHQ) or robust training scenarios. A man-portable, fully-integrated,

comprehensive CRC Simulation Suite that is high-fidelity and capable of providing training in

Battle Management, Weapons Control, Wide Area Surveillance, Combat Identification (CID), 

Airspace Management, and Tactical Data Link (TDL) is critical to CRC mission crew training. 

The system must be scalable, Distributed Mission Operation (DMO)-capable and able to be

networked with other like-systems. It must also be flexible enough to run Tactical Display

Framework (TDF) and accept inputs from the Non-Organic Radar Access (NORA) system of

record. It must include an integrated communications capability that is compatible with the

TYQ-23 equipment.

2. Source of Need. Air Combat Command Instruction (ACCI) 13-1 Mission Training

Program (MTP); 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

103 ACS Orange, CT 123 ACS Blue Ash, OH 141 ACS Punta Borinquen, PR

109 ACS Salt Lake City IAP, UT 128 ACS Volk Fld, WI 255 ACS Gulfport CRTC, MS

116 ACS Warrenton, OR 133 TS Ft Dodge, IA

117 ACS Savannah IAP, GA 134 ACS McConnell AFB, KS

4. Program Details. PEC: 52672F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

10 Simulation Suites (3080) $1,065,000 $10,650,000

Total $10,650,000
150

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION EC-130J SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICES

1. Background. The EC-130J performs missions for Air Force Special Operations Command 

(AFSOC) providing specialized Military Information Support Operations and clandestine 

infiltration, exfiltration and resupply of Special Operations Forces. Future budgets are predicted 

to dramatically reduce flying hours available for aircrew refresher and proficiency / continuation 

training. AFSOC’s strategic objective to meet increasing mission requirements requires the 

implementation of a distributed system of strategically placed aircraft simulators. The EC-130J 

Weapons Systems Trainer (WST) flight deck simulator meets AFSOC/A3 objectives of colocated simulators with operational units. It permits refresher training for the Combat Systems 

Officer (CSO) without incurring travel costs of 16 crews per year. In addition, a significant 

number of pilot, CSO and loadmaster currency events can be accomplished in the simulator 

versus the aircraft. Estimated flying hour requirements are reduced from 35 to 12 hours per 

week resulting in a $5,600,000 annual reduction in operational costs. Currently, the C-130J 

Flight Simulator does not meet EC-130J mission profiles allowing only for emergency 

procedures training for pilots and loadmasters. Since the C-130J Flight Simulator is not 

configured for a CSO Flight Station, CSOs have a simulator waiver. The E/MC-130J MultiFunction Training Aid (MFTA) will support cockpit familiarization, procedures training, ground 

and inflight checklists, and emergency procedures training. This device is crucial as a training 

device for check ride requirements and aircrew proficiency. The Ku-Band Spread Spectrum 

(KuSS) System Trainer will integrate the Partial Task Trainer (PTT), and greatly enhance its 

abilities to reduce operational flying requirements. In addition, the KuSS trainer will 

significantly reduce aircraft maintenance issues associated with the hatch-mounted antenna. 

Currently, training is accomplished on an “as available” basis with no more than two of seven 

aircraft configured for KuSS training.

2. Source of Need. Program Objective Memorandum (POM) issue #16-361; US Special 

Operations Command Commander (USSOCOM/CDR) FY12-15 Commander’s Training 

Guidance, 17Aug 2011; AFSOC Vision, Mission and Priorities Statement, Aug 2011; 2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Unit Impacted. 

193 SOW Harrisburg IAP, PA

4. Program Details. PEC: 41132F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 EC-130J WST (3010) $30,261,000 $30,261,000

1 EC-130J MFTA (3010) $2,500,000 $2,500,000

1 KuSS Training System (3010) $400,000 $400,000

Total $33,161,000
151

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION MQ-1/MQ-9 DISTRIBUTED MISSION OPERATIONS CAPABLE 

SIMULATOR CONNECTIVITY TO THE DISTRIBUTED TRAINING OPERATIONS 

CENTER

1. Background. Simulators often provide the only Continuation Training (CT) opportunities 

for Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) aircrew, though most units have only one Predator Mission 

Aircrew Training System (PMATS) on site. This limitation does not allow aircrew to train to 

evolving multi-ship Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTPs). Multi-ship TTPs are a highemphasis item because they address the spectrum of RPA’s weapons employment vulnerabilities. 

Multi-ship tactics dramatically increase probability of kill against all target sets, and mitigate 

collateral damage by providing extra sensors to boost commanders’ situational awareness. To 

bridge the training gap, the RPA community needs the ability to participate in the Live-VirtualConstructive (LVC) distributed training structure afforded by Distributed Mission Operations 

(DMO) and the Distributed Training Operations Center (DTOC). Training with the DTOC 

would allow for practice and development of multi-ship tactics for both current and future 

missions. In addition, the DTOC architecture will allow all crew members, including 

intelligence personnel, to train in the scenario, an ability that is non-existent in fielded RPA 

simulators. Finally, participation in DMO would allow other combat assets to train with RPAs 

thereby enhancing interoperability and lethality across the Combat Air Forces (CAF). Gateways 

are installed by the DTOC to connect the unit simulator to the Air Reserve Component Network 

(ARCNet).

2. Source of Need. DTOC User Requests; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

118 AW Nashville IAP, TN 163 RW March ARB, CA 178 FW Springfield MAP, OH

119 WG Hector IAP, ND 174 ATW Syracuse IAP, NY 214 RS Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ

147 RW Ellington IAP, TX

4. Program Details. PEC: 53219F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

1 PMATS DMO Integration (3840) $145,000 $145,000

1 ARCNet Gateway v1 (3080) $35,000 $35,000

7 ARCNet Gateways v2 (3080) $27,750 $194,250

Total $374,250
152

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER JONT RANGE EXTENSION 

WITH JOINT DISTRIBUTED OPERATIONAL TRAINING SYSTEM

1. Background. The Theater Battle Management Core System (TBMCS) Part Task Trainer 

(PTT) does not support link degradation and manipulation training. Consequently, Air Reserve 

Component (ARC) Air and Space Operations Center (AOC) units cannot conduct in-garrison 

training on a significant number of Air Combat Command (ACC)-mandated Combat Operations 

Division (COD) Joint Interface Control Cell (JICC) Task Training List (TTL) items. Air 

National Guard (ANG) units cannot consistently accomplish training using “live” data and thus 

require a training simulation capability. Each ARC AOC unit requires Joint Range Extension 

(JRE) and Joint Distributed Operational Training System (JDOTS). JRE allows JICC to build, 

initiate, manage, manipulate, track and link data in the AOC COD. JDOTS is a training suite 

necessary to create simulated link and track data. Non-ARC AOCs do not utilize JDOTS 

because they are able to effectively accomplish training using “live” data links. It is critical that 

ARC AOC units obtain JRE with JDOTS software in order to effectively keep their JICC 

personnel trained on essential equipment. In order to ensure seamless training capability, units 

also require installation, configuration, user training and 24/7 help desk support.

2. Source of Need. 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted:

101 AOG Tyndall AFB, FL 112 AOS State College, PA 183 AOG Springfield, IL

102 AOG Otis ANGB, MA 152 AOG Syracuse IAP, NY 701 COS March AFB, CA

109 AOG JBPHH, HI 157 AOG Jefferson Barracks, MO 710 COS Langley AFB, VA

217 AOG Battle Creek IAP, MI

4. Program Details. PEC: 57411F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

10 JDOTS (3840) $36,000 $360,000

10 Help Desk / Support * (3840) $11,600 $116,000

Total $476,000

* Recurring annual expense.
153

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION GUARDIAN ANGEL FULL SPECTRUM CAPABILITIES

1. Background. Guardian Angel (GA) missions demand continual training 365 days a year. 

With an evolving battlefield and continually changing Tactics, Techniques and Procedures 

(TTP), GAs are finding it increasingly difficult to meet the tactical training requirements to 

safely utilize battlefield assets. With limited available time and no co-located facilities, GAs are 

forced to accomplish hazardous live tactical training, often without ground-based simulations, 

causing great risk to the individual and equipment. The GA’s goal is to develop a core training 

suite to enhance training capability, improve overall safety and reduce unneeded travel and costs. 

The suite must encompass all core tactical aspects of the GA mission set to include military 

parachute operations and water operations proficiency. These two areas have proven to be the 

most dangerous and perishable skillsets in the GA career field. The suite will allow GAs to 

safely train in a controlled environment versus performing potentially life threating procedures 

with no simulated training. The GA’s vision is to provide instructors the ability to properly train 

members in a safe and controlled environment, which will greatly reduce the possibility of 

injuries. With the addition of the Full Spectrum Suite, GAs will have the ability to focus core 

tactical training on specific individual skillsets, resulting in a more capable weapons system and 

overall total force.

2. Source of Need. Full Spectrum Capabilities Suite identified by the GA Senior Leaders 

Working Group and supported by the Weapon System Council; Current Wing Commanders 

identify this as a critical need to support the mission by preventing training deficiencies and 

wasted resources on core training requirements; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

106 RQW Gabreski AP, NY 129 RQW Moffett Fld, CA 176 WG JB Elmendorf, AK

4. Program Details. PEC: 53119F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

3 Water Operation Trainers (3080) $1,200,000 $3,600,000

3 Military Parachute Trainers (3080) $3,800,000 $11,400,000

Total $15,000,000
154

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

SIMULATION DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM NETWORKED 

MISSION SIMULATOR WITH FULLY INTEGRATED SUITE OF DISTRIBUTED 

TRAINING OPERATIONS CENTER EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE AND 

CONNECTIVITY 

1 Background. Air National Guard (ANG) and Air Force (AF) Distributed Ground Sites 

(DGS), designated the AN/GSQ-272 SENTINEL Distributed Common Ground System (DCGS) 

weapon system, lack an integrated mission trainer able to provide analysts a predictable, reliable 

and tailorable Desired Learning Objective (DLO)-driven networked simulation. The solution 

must enable crews to accomplish training and maintain Mission Ready status as well as 

accomplish proficiency training in the absence of live theater Intelligence, Surveillance and 

Reconnaissance (ISR) missions. Currently, some units have recorded past Full Motion Video 

(FMV) missions for limited home station training. While AF ISR Agency published a DCGS 

Weapons System Trainer (WST) Flight Plan in Sep 2013, the Flight Plan does not integrate 

DCGS into live and virtual Large Force Employment (LFE) exercises until approximately Jan 

2017. The ANG Distributed Training and Operations Center (DTOC) is an existing multidomain network providing coordinated virtual LFE planning and execution among 

geographically separated joint Service participants. Expansion of DTOC into DCGS sites 

integrates the DCGS community into training for the future Contested and Degraded Operations

(CDO) battlespace without requiring movement of personnel or aircraft. The DTOC’s ability to 

record and archive missions enhances training opportunities throughout the entire DCGS 

community. It also enhances LFE debriefings and playback that serve as ready off-the-shelf 

training for DCGS crews. The WST Flight Plan is a multi-year endeavor adding DTOC to ANG 

DCGS sites to provide a near-term solution to maintain proficiency as available live ISR sorties 

decrease, address a shortfall for LFE-style training and integration, and provide a ready-made 

complement to WST.

2. Source of Need. Air Force ISR 2023: Delivering Decision Advantage; AF ISR Agency 

Strategic Plan 2013-2023, Dec 2013; AF ISR Agency DCGS Weapons System Trainer Flight 

Plan, Sep 2013; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. 

102 IW Otis ANGB, MA 152 IS Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV 192 IS JB Langley-Eustis, VA

117 IS

123 IS

139 IS

Birmingham IAP, AL

Little Rock AFB, AR

Ft. Gordon, GA

169 IS

181 IW

184 IW

Salt Lake City IAP, UT

Terre Haute IAP, IN

McConnell AFB, KS

201 IS

234 IS

JB PH-Hickam, HI

Beale AFB, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 55208F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

11 ARCNet Gateway Racks (3080) $20,250 $222,750

11 Site Installs / Training (3840) $1,500 $16,500

11 Interface Hardware Suites (3080) $45,550 $501,050

Total $740,300
155

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

RANGE INSTRUMENTATION HIGH-FIDELITY SURROGATE TARGETS

1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) has a shortfall in realistic target identification 

and acquisition training. To meet Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) tasking requirements, the 

ANG’s primary training ranges require realistic target surrogates to replicate real-world complex 

target sets. These ranges have the airspace and real estate infrastructure necessary to fully utilize 

surrogate assets. High-value complex target arrays mimicking unique vehicles, tanks, mobile 

communication equipment and other targets require the physical characteristics to include visual 

footprint, density and heat signatures to simulate real systems. High-fidelity surrogate target 

arrays, used in conjunction with complex mission scenarios, advanced aviation targeting pods 

and electronic sensors, provide a cost effective solution to providing visual target density, as well 

as targeting pod identification and acquisition associated with physical and heat signatures of 

real systems. Acquisition of these systems will provide local access for ANG units to 

accomplish realistic training from home station and during deployments to the Combat 

Readiness Training Centers (CRTC). This accurate re-creation of target systems will allow 

aviators to hone their skills and add increasingly difficult training scenarios for a constantly 

changing environment. These high-fidelity target arrays are used at ANG training ranges to 

support primary users (both air and ground forces) during all phases of training and exercises to 

include air-to-ground gunnery, laser operations and Close Air Support (CAS) training.

2. Source of Need. RAP Tasking Messages; ANG Training Ranges and Airspace Roadmap, 

FY10; ANG Mission Directive 10.01; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

Adirondack Range, NY Airburst Range, CO Atterbury Range, IN

Bollen Range, PA Cannon Range, MO Grayling Range, MI

Hardwood Range, WI Jefferson Range, IN McMullen Range, TX

Razorback Range, AR Shelby Range, MS Smoky Hill Range, KS

Townsend Range, GA Warren Grove Range, NJ

4. Program Details. PEC: 52634

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

79 High-Fidelity Targets (3080) $135,000 $10,665,000

70 Inflatable Infrared Targets (3080) $36,000 $2,520,000

Total $13,185,000

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation
156

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation

RANGE INSTRUMENTATION MOBILE HIGH-FIDELITY THREAT SIMULATORS

1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) has a shortfall in realistic Electronic Warfare 

(EW) threat training. To meet Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) tasking requirements, the ANG’s 

Combat Readiness Training Centers (CRTC) ranges require realistic simulators to replicate an 

Integrated Air Defense System (IADS) environment. These ranges have the airspace and real

estate infrastructure necessary to fully utilize EW assets. These EW packages will consist of 

three major components: Mobile Control Threat Units (CTU) to provide regional support in 

moving current Joint Threat Emitters (JTE); Information Friend and Foe (IFF) Tracking Radar 

Systems to provide tracking for JTE; and upgraded JTE emitters from the recently awarded 

contract by Air Combat Command. Acquisition of these systems will provide regional access to 

ANG units to accomplish realistic IADS training from home station and during deployments to 

the CRTCs through Distributed Mission Operations (DMO). This accurate threat signal 

generation will allow aviators to hone their initial EW skills and add increasingly difficult threat 

scenarios to simulate a constantly changing environment. Threat simulators will be connected to

Air Combat Maneuver Instrumentation (ACMI) systems and data link systems located at the 

CRTCs. These systems will be used in a deployable configuration at ranges to facilitate training 

with a wide array of ANG aircraft (A-10, C-130, C-17, F-15 and F-16).

2. Source of Need. RAP Tasking messages; ANG Training Ranges and Airspace Roadmap, 

FY10; ANG Mission Directive 10.01; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

Adirondack Range, NY Airburst Range, CO Atterbury Range, IN

Bollen Range, PA Cannon Range, MO Grayling Range, MI

Hardwood Range, WI Jefferson Range, IN McMullen Range, TX

Razorback Range, AR Shelby Range, MS Smoky Hill Range, KS

Townsend Range, GA Warren Grove Range, NJ

4. Program Details. PEC: 27429

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

4 EW Emitters (3080) $8,500,000 $34,000,000

2 Mobile CTUs (3080) $2,300,000 $4,600,000

2 Ranges Mobile High-Fidelity Threat Simulators 

(3080) $1,500,000 $3,000,000

Total $41,600,000
157

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

RANGE INSTRUMENTATION COMMUNICATIONS AND TACTICAL DATA LINK 

ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT

1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) has a shortfall in realistic communications and 

data link immersive environments at the critical nodes within the range training infrastructure. 

To meet Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) tasking requirements, the ANG’s Combat Readiness 

Training Centers (CRTC) and Primary Training Ranges (PTR) require realistic, standardized, 

full spectrum, and immersive electronic training environments that include appropriate levels of 

communications and data link systems. These ranges have the airspace and real estate 

infrastructure necessary to support every phase of ANG combat training from employment 

through After Action Review (AAR). The items referenced below are required to replicate the 

operating environment, record / score employment and relay the information in a useable format 

back to the warfighter. Acquisition of these systems will provide ANG units the ability to 

accomplish realistic full-spectrum training from home station. Battlefield Operational Support, 

Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking, Joint Range Extensions (to include Link-16 radios 

and range voice radios) configured together provide an accurate re-creation of the electronic 

wartime operating environment, and recording of aircrew actions and performance. This will 

allow aviators to hone their cockpit resource management skills and push their personal 

envelopes of task saturation prior to experiencing them on the battlefield. The systems will be 

located at the CRTCs and PTRs with distributed AAR to the squadron level.

2. Source of Need. RAP Tasking Messages; ANG Training Ranges and Airspace Roadmap, 

FY10; Training Range Infrastructure Connectivity Contingency Operations Plan FY09; ANG 

Management Directive (MD) 10.01; 2012-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

Adirondack Range, NY Airburst Range, CO Atterbury Range, IN

Bollen Range, PA Cannon Range, MO Grayling Range, MI

Hardwood Range, WI Jefferson Range, IN McMullen Range, TX

Razorback Range, AR Shelby Range, MS Smoky Hill Range, KS

Townsend Range, GA Warren Grove Range, NJ Alpena CRTC, MI

Gulfport CRTC, MS Savannah CRTC, GA Volk Field CRTC, WI

4. Program Details. PEC: 52634

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

13 Battlefield Operational Support Systems (3840) $297,000 $3,861,000

13 GPS Tracking Systems (3080) $1,100,000 $14,300,000

11 Joint Range Extension Systems (3840) $132,000 $1,452,000

12 LVT-2 Link-16 Radios (3080) $270,000 $3,240,000

12 Range Radio Systems (3080) $86,000 $1,032,000

Total $23,885,000

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation
158

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

RANGE INSTRUMENTATION JOINT ADVANCED WEAPON SCORING SYSTEM

1. Background. Using off-the-shelf technology, Joint Advanced Weapon Scoring System 

(JAWSS) upgrades the Tactical Ordnance Scoring System (TOSS) with a joint Air Force / Navy 

system by providing night and laser scoring capabilities. These systems provide greater accuracy, 

night and day scoring capabilities, laser scoring, strafe scoring, virtual reality Imaging Weapons 

Training System (IWTS), No-Drop Weapon Scoring (NDWS), and automated remote feedback 

for home station debrief. JAWSS consists of five systems: Weapon Impact Scoring System 

(WISS), Laser Evaluation System-Mobile (LES-M), Large Scale Target Sensor System 

(LSTSS), Remote Strafe Scoring System (RSSS), and the Imaging Weapons Training System 

(IWTS). Upgrading systems currently in use at 14 Air Gunnery Ranges provides pilots 

immediate feedback during training events at local ANG ranges to meet training and Ready 

Aircrew Program (RAP) requirements.

2. Source of Need. Range Working Group; Combat Training Range Group; Ready Aircrew 

Program; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

Adirondack Range, NY Airburst Range, CO Atterbury Range, IN

Bollen Range, PA Cannon Range, MO Grayling Range, MI

Hardwood Range, WI Jefferson Range, IN McMullen Range, TX

Razorback Range, AR Shelby Range, MS Smoky Hill Range, KS

Townsend Range, GA Warren Grove Range, NJ

4. Program Details. PEC: 52634

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

14 JAWSS Spares / Upgrades (3840) $200,000 $2,800,000

14 Replacement WISS Systems (3840) $500,000 $7,000,000

14 Site Communications Infrastructures (3840) $250,000 $3,500,000

Total $13,300,000

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation
159

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Simulation and Distributed Mission Operations

RANGE INSTRUMENTATION “RANGELESS” AIR COMBAT MANEUVERING 

INSTRUMENTATION

1. Background. “Rangeless” instrumentation capability is a long-standing requirement of the 

Combat Air Forces (CAF). The next generation of the Air Combat Maneuvering Instrumentation 

(ACMI) pod (P5) provides this capability by leveraging Global Positioning System (GPS) 

receivers, data recorders and on-board simulation technology to provide ACMI training 

independent of ground infrastructure. This technology allows training to occur at any location to 

support home station and deployed training. This capability provides greater training to pilots by 

increasing development of situational awareness and provides more effective debriefing. 

Without this capability, Air National Guard (ANG) units must deploy to a Combat Readiness 

Training Center (CRTC) to train with a traditional “tethered” ACMI system. The P5 pod system 

reduces operations tempo while providing higher levels of more complex training. With the 

limited availability of traditional, part-time ANG pilots, and the high operations tempo being 

maintained, it is essential to maximize training opportunities. The CAF Combat Training Range 

Review Board has programmed 250 P5 pods for the ANG. The ANG requires a total of 

100 additional pods to meet immediate requirements and complete transition to the “Rangeless”

system. 

2. Source of Need. Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) Tasking Messages; ANG Training Ranges 

and Airspace Roadmap, FY10; ANG Mission Directive 10.01; ANG ACMI / Electronic Warfare

Concept of Operations; Revision #5 to CAF Operational Requirements Document (ORD) #305-

76-I/II/III-H for P5 Combat Training System, 29 Jul 2004; Improvements to Combat Air Forces

Ranges, validated 6 Dec 1976; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

Alpena CRTC, MI Savannah CRTC, GA Volk Field CRTC, WI

Gulfport CRTC, MS

4. Program Details. PEC: 27429 

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

100 P5 Pods (3010) $170,000 $17,000,000

Total $17,000,000

Simulation, Distributed Mission Operations and Range Instrumentation
160

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
161

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

 Missile Warning and Satellite Control

 Network Warfare / Information Ops

 ANG CW is 40% of AF Network Warfare / Information Ops

 ANG Space is 20% of AF MW and SATC2

Space Operations - The Air National Guard’s (ANG) 

contribution to Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) space 

missions includes over 1,100 personnel within eight 

squadrons operating six distinct weapons systems. These 

units support three of the four AFSPC functional mission 

areas. From the 137 SWS, CO, which is the nation’s sole 

provider of mobile, survivable and endurable ballistic 

missile warning for the defense of North America, to the 

148 SOPS, CA, which is responsible for Command and 

Control of 40 percent of the Military Strategic and Tactical 

Relay (MILSTAR) satellite constellation. 

Cyber Warfare and Information Operations (CW/IO) - The ANG CW/IO force is made up of 

nine units in CA, DE, KS, MD, RI, TX, VT and WA. Together, they provide CW/IO capabilities 

supporting Federal and State agencies, the Air Force, and Combatant Commands (COCOM), by 

conducting cyberspace force application, cyberspace defense, cyberspace support, testing and 

Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTP) development, cyber training and related planning 

activities. Guardsmen participating in these missions draw 

upon synergies with their related civilian careers, leveraging 

skills and experience developed by high-tech companies. 

Specific missions assigned to ANG units range from network 

vulnerability assessments to digital media / network analysis to 

full-spectrum cyber warfare support in both exercises and 

operations. Execution of these activities occurs from home 

station, Air Force locations and national facilities. 

In 2013, ANG CW/IO units will develop 

capabilities for integrated training and 

testing, and TTP development. The 

remaining requirements include individual 

training, infrastructure connectivity and 

updated software tools for normalizing cyber 

units to support the Air Force and US Cyber

Command (USCYBERCOM).

Space Operations, Cyber 

Warfare & Information 

Operations

Space Operations, Cyber Warfare & Information Operations TAB Q
162

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Space Operations, Cyber Warfare & Information 

Operations 

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Capabilities List

Space Operations:

 Counter Communications System

Cyber Warfare and Information Operations:

 Garrison Interceptor Platform

 Virtual Interconnected Training Environment

 Secure Infrastructure Collaborative Capability 

 Remote Access Toolkit

Essential Capabilities List

Space Operations:

 Water Purification Unit

 Joint Collaboration Cell Enterprise

 OMAR upgrades

Cyber Warfare and Information Operations:

 Tactical Transportable

Desired Capabilities List

Space Operations:

 None

Cyber Warfare and Information Operations:

 None
163

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Space Superiority / Cyberspace Superiority

SPACE OPERATIONS COUNTER COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM

1. Background. The 114th Range Operations Squadron (ROPS) and 216th Operational Support 

Squadron (OSS) are being re-designated as Unit Equipped Space Control Squadrons (SPCS). 

Converting the 114 ROPS and 216 OSS to SPCS is aligned with Air National Guard (ANG) 

CAPSTONE principles. The new mission for both units is to conduct Space Superiority 

operations in support of global and theater campaigns. In order to fulfill mission requirements

and to assure our ANG space units modernize concurrently it is critical the 114 SPCS and 

216 SPCS acquire Block 10.2 Counter Communications System (CCS) suites. The space control 

mission area within Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) leverages high-demand and lowdensity assets. The delivery of modernized equipment enhances ANG Space Superiority within 

a premier space control mission area, and presents a surge-to-war, deployable capability to the 

Combatant Commander and Combined Force Air Component Commander. 

2. Source of Need. AFSPC Commander’s Annual Prioritized Air Reserve Component (ARC) 

Initiatives, 8 Nov 2013, Attachment 1, Priority #1; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

114 ROPS Patrick AFB, FL 216 OSS Vandenberg AFB, CA

4. Program Details. PEC: 53116F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

2 CCS (3080) $22,500,000 $45,000,000

Total $45,000,000
164

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

CYBER WARFARE AND INFORMATION OPERATIONS GARRISON 

INTERCEPTOR PLATFORM

1. Background. The first US Air Force Cyber Weapon System developed and approved for 

use is the CVA / Hunt (Interceptor) Weapon System (WS). The WS includes three breakout 

components: Mobile Interceptor Platform (MIP), Deployable Interceptor Platform (DIP), and 

Garrison Interceptor Platform (GIP). Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) provides a way 

ahead for procurement of MIP and DIP. GIP is not programmed for Air National Guard (ANG) 

units due to cost and rapid growth in the mission area. GIP provides the capability in cyber hunt 

to detect and mitigate advanced persistent threats within the Department of Defense (DOD) 

Information Networks. GIP capability is not achievable with only the MIP and DIP 

components. GIP integration at ANG gained units is critical to Combat Mission Ready (CMR) 

mission capability and sustainment. The GIP provides a substantial “dual-use” opportunity 

within respective regions to meet DOD cyberspace requirements as well as in support of State 

domestic operations capabilities. 

2. Source of Need. US Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM) CYBER FORCE Concept of 

Employment (CONEMP), Mar 2013; AFSPC Cyber Mission Force Concept of Operations 

(CONOPS), Nov 2013; Headquarters Air Force (HAF) Cyber Mission Force Program Action 

Directive (PAD), Dec 2013; OTE MAJCOM (AFSPC) Priority; Specified as priority for Air 

Reserve Component in Program Objective Memorandum (POM); Acceleration requested by 

Component-Numbered Air Force (C-NAF) / Air Force Component Commander, Feb 2013; 2013 

ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

143 IOS Camp Murray, WA 261 NWS Sepulveda ANGB, CA 262 NWS McChord AFB, WA

4. Program Details. PEC: 28088F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

3 GIP (3080) $2,930,000 $8,790,000

Total $8,790,000

Space Superiority / Cyberspace Superiority
165

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Space Superiority / Cyberspace Superiority

CYBER WARFARE AND INFORMATION OPERATIONS VIRTUAL 

INTERCONNECTED TRAINING ENVIRONMENT

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Cyberspace Operations (CO) units require a

virtual interconnected training environment to conduct training, support Tier 1, 2 and 3 exercises 

and maintain Combat Mission Ready (CMR) proficiency as required by 24th Air Force. This 

capability supports implementation of the Cyber Mission Force (CMF) construct and ensures 

distributed training for integrated warfighter operations in kinetics and non-kinetics. The Virtual 

Interconnected Training Environment (VITE) is a scalable capability configurable to virtually

simulate the World Wide Web (WWW). The VITE interconnects to commercial and government 

networks (i.e., NIPR, SIPR and JWICS) representing a wide variety of DOD Information 

Network (DODIN) environments. The VITE operates as a stand-alone training environment and

connects to the Distributed Training Operations Center (DTOC) to provide more realistic threats, 

targets and cyberspace terrain. The VITE hosts a wide variety of systems and integrates with 

other weapon system training environments without additional licensing costs. 

2. Source of Need. Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) Guidance Memorandum 10-1, 2 and 

3; Air Force Cyber Command (AFCYBER) Cyberspace Requirement Number (CRN), Jul 2011; 

10th Air Force 2013 Prioritized Requirements, Aug 2013; 2010-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

102 NWS Quonset IAP, RI 175 NWS Martin State AP, MD 262 NWS McChord AFB, WA

143 IOS Camp Murray, WA 177 IAS McConnell AFB, KS 273 IOS San Antonio, TX

166 NWS New Castle IAP, DE 261 NWS Sepulveda ANGB, CA DTOC Des Moines, IA

4. Program Details. PEC: 28087F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

2 VITE RGI Hubs (3080) $393,000 $786,000

8 VITE HOTSIM Systems (3080) $340,000 $2,720,000

8 JIOR PICO Nodes (3080) $60,000 $480,000

8 Interconnection Installation (3080) $50,000 $400,000

9 Interconnection Annual (3840) $42,000 $378,000

Total $4,764,000
166

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Space Superiority / Cyberspace Superiority

CYBER WARFARE AND INFORMATION OPERATIONS SECURE 

INFRASTRUCTURE COLLABORATIVE CAPABILITY

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Information Operations (IO) and Network Warfare

(NW) squadrons lack the capability to access secure, classified, real-time communications and 

networks used by the Air Force and US Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM) for collaboration, 

as well as threat and unique cyber situational awareness. ANG units operate from squadron 

spaces that are distant from service and national cyber locations. The majority of planning, 

operations activities and cyber warfare information sharing, occur in classified, collaborative

environments, primarily through the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communication System 

(JWICS) and National Security Agency-Network (NSA-Net) infrastructure. The Secure 

Infrastructure Collaborative Capability (SIC2) provides a secure collaborative environment 

and common operations picture to support near real-time full spectrum cyberspace operations. 

2. Source of Need. USCYBERCOM Cyberspace Operations Capabilities, Dec 2013; Air Force 

Cyber Command (AFCYBER) Cyberspace Requirement Need (CRN), Aug 2011; Enabling 

Concept for Cyberspace Common Operations Picture, Aug 2011; 2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical 

Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

4. Program Details. PEC: 27277F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

11 SIC2 (3080) $300,000 $3,300,000

Total $3,300,000

102 NWS Quonset IAP, RI 175 NWS Martin State AP, MD 262 NWS McChord AFB, WA

132 NWS Des Moines, IA 177 IAS McConnell AFB, KS 273 IOS San Antonio, TX

143 IOS

166 NWS

Camp Murray, WA

New Castle IAP, DE

229 IOS

261 NWS

Burlington ANGB, VT

Sepulveda ANGB, CA

DTOC Des Moines, IA
167

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Space Superiority / Cyberspace Superiority

CYBER WARFARE AND INFORMATION OPERATIONS REMOTE ACCESS 

TOOLSET

1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG), as the AF Cyber Red Team, employs cyber

threat tactics to operationally assess both cyber defense systems and sensors, and conducts 

training for cyber defense operators and maintainers. The existing software platform lacks the 

agility to employ updated malware and signatures required to replicate advanced threat 

behaviors. Remote Access Toolset (RAT) is commercial software that enables the control and 

behavior of cyber threat techniques presented to targeted networks and computers.

2. Source of Need. Executive Order to Incorporate Realistic Cyberspace Conditions into Major 

Department of Defense Exercises; Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI)

6510.01F, 9 Feb 2011; 2011-2013 ARC WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted.

177 IAS McConnell AFB, KS 262 NWS McChord AFB, WA

4. Program Details. PEC: 53056F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

2 RAT (3080) $400,000 $800,000

Total $800,000
168

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

This page intentionally left blank.
169

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Security Forces

Air National Guard (ANG) Security Forces 

(SF) personnel from the 54 states and territories 

prepare and train for their dual mission of 

supporting worldwide contingency deployments 

as well as responding to State emergencies.

With more than 7,000 assigned members, SF

provide security to personnel and priority 

resources at home station and deployed locations 

through law enforcement patrols, integrated base 

defense and anti-terrorism / force protection 

initiatives. By using Integrated Base Defense 

principles, SF control terrain both inside and 

outside the base perimeter. As the battlefield dictates, 

SF train to encounter hostile threats while conducting 

Military Operations in Urban Terrain, Area Security 

Operations, Close Precision Engagement, Raven 

Missions, Fly-Away Security, Detainee Movement 

Operations, Agricultural 

Development missions, 

Personal Security 

Details, Mounted /

Dismounted Individual 

and Team Patrols, 

Convoy Operations, 

High-Risk Vehicle 

Inspections, Suspect 

Apprehension / Detention, Installation Access Control, and Heavy 

Weapons Support. Security Forces professionals also provide 

nuclear, information, industrial and physical security, as well as

combat arms training. 

 Mobilize and Deploy

 Integrated Base Defense

 Homeland / Fulltime Security

Security Forces TAB R
170

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Security Forces 

2013 Weapons and Tactics Conference

Critical Combat Capabilities List

 Professional Bag Expansion and Modernization

 Active Shooter Response Suite

 Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Night Observation Equipment

 Close Combat Mission Capability Kits

 Small Arms Range Solutions

Essential Capabilities List

 Fulfill Weapons Shortfalls 

 Next Generation Intra-Squad Personal Wireless Communication System

 Security Forces Helmet

 Ballistic Mobile Defense Fighting Position

Desired Capabilities List

 Next Generation Lightweight Level 4 Small Arms Protective Insert

 Interactive Law Enforcement Simulator

 Modular Advanced Base Defense Operations Center

 Mobile, Ruggedized, Real-Time Command and Control and Situational Awareness Suite

 Small Form Factor, Squad-Level Remotely Piloted Aircraft with Video Surveillance
171

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Agile Combat Support

SECURITY FORCES PROFESSIONAL BAG EXPANSION AND MODERNIZATION

1. Background. Security Forces (SF) deploy more frequently and for longer durations than 

most other airmen, causing SF professional bag equipment to degrade at a higher rate. The 

content of the SF professional bag includes specialized equipment specific to SF duties and is 

utilized both in deployed Areas of Responsibility (AOR) as well as in normal, daily operational 

use at home station. Professional bag items include Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and 

SF mission specific duty gear. The current inventory of SF clothing does not meet current AOR 

requirements for fire-retardant clothing, placing SF members at a greater risk of severe injuries 

when exposed to indirect fire or improvised explosive devices. Ballistic eye protection is 

another equipment item used by SF members to combat environmental and wartime hazards 

inherent to force protection missions. SF units are currently unable to fill the number of 

professional bags necessary to meet mission requirements. Professional bag expansion and 

modernization brings improved capabilities to ensure mission success.

2. Source of Need. Lessons Learned from Domestic Operations and Operations ENDURING 

FREEDOM (OEF), IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) and NEW DAWN (OND); 2012 ARC WEPTAC 

Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. All 96 SF squadrons within the 54 states and territories require the 

professional bags.

4. Program Details. PEC: 52625F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

7649 Professional Bags (3080) $1,129 $8,635,721

Total $8,635,721
172

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Agile Combat Support

SECURITY FORCES ACTIVE SHOOTER RESPONSE SUITE

1. Background. The inability for the Air National Guard (ANG) Security Forces (SF) to 

effectively respond to an active shooter scenario creates a liability and places the safety of our 

airmen at risk. Recent events at Fort Hood and the Washington Navy Yard, as well as in-theater 

events in Kabul, continue to highlight the need for specialized, active shooter response. 

Effective response requires the presence of specific equipment for tense, rapidly evolving 

scenarios. Protection of the responding officer is paramount, and a standard level of individual 

protective personal equipment is needed. Both the Department of Defense standard Enhanced 

Small Arms Protective Insert ballistic plate and soft ballistic inserts that meet Level IIIA or 

higher protection must be readily available due to the varying environments that will be 

encountered by responding personnel. Body armor provides the protection capability to respond 

to an all-hazards physical threat environment. Maxillofacial mandible with ballistic visors 

provides protection to the head and face of the responding officer. In many active shooter 

scenarios, the responding officer is confronted with a subject inside of a locked room. As a 

mitigating tool, the acquisition of a breaching kit ensures that officers can respond to any 

situation. This active shooter response suite seamlessly integrates with the Less-Than-Lethal 

Kits and gear established in the Security Forces Professional Bags.

2. Source of Need. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 31-101 Integrated Defense; AFI 31-117 Arming 

and Use of Forces; Lessons Learned from Domestic Operations and Operations ENDURING 

FREEDOM (OEF), IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) and NEW DAWN (OND); 2012-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. All 96 SF squadrons will be impacted within the 54 states and territories.

4. Program Details. PEC: 52625F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

96 Active Shooter Suites (3080) $151,000 $14,496,000

Total $14,496,000
173

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Agile Combat Support

SECURITY FORCES SURVEILLANCE, TARGET ACQUISITION AND NIGHT 

OBSERVATION EQUIPMENT

1. Background. Air National Guard (ANG) Security Forces (SF) personnel require crucial 

thermal and infrared detection devices that will provide usable imagery in both daytime and 

nighttime operations through the use of active or passive Surveillance, Target Acquisition and 

Night Observation (STANO) equipment. This equipment will enhance SF combat capability to 

navigate, identify targets, distinguish friend or foe, and effectively engage targets in low 

signature environments. Active STANO equipment projects some form of energy, is generally 

limited to infrared (IR) illumination devices, and can be detected by the enemy using passive 

STANO devices. There are two categories of passive STANO equipment: image-intensification 

devices and thermal imaging devices. Image-intensification devices amplify existing or ambient 

light at night and are viewed through a viewing scope. Those images can be adversely affected 

by environmental or artificial conditions such as fog, rain, falling snow, smoke, camouflage, 

light vegetation, or a combination of these factors. Thermal imaging devices can penetrate those 

adverse conditions whether in daytime or nighttime operations. SF personnel lack an effective 

thermal imaging capability as mandated in the SF Mission Capability (MISCAP) Statement. 

Lacking this capability significantly degrades their ability to gain tactical battlefield advantage 

when environmental obscurants reduce target identification. 

2. Source of Need. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 31-101 Integrated Defense; Security Forces 

Logistics Detail; MISCAP Statement; Lessons Learned from Operations ENDURING 

FREEDOM (OEF), IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) and NEW DAWN (OND); 2011-2012 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Requirement.

3. Units Impacted. All 96 ANG SF squadrons within the 54 states and territories.

5. Program Details. PEC: 52625F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

522 Detection Enhancement Devices (3080) $5,103 $2,663,766

Total $2,663,766
174

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Agile Combat Support

SECURITY FORCES CLOSE COMBAT MISSION CAPABILITY KITS

1. Background. The recent change to Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2646 “Security Forces 

(SF) Training and Standardization Evaluation Programs” implemented the requirement for SF 

Shoot Move Communicate (SMC) training and evaluation. The SMC course standardizes basic 

individual and team firearms tactical skills necessary to engage hostile threats. The Close 

Combat Mission Capability Kit (CCMCK) provides the ability to conduct critical Tactics, 

Techniques and Procedures (TTP) effectively across the threat spectrum. The CCMCK allows a 

simulated, controlled and safe force-on-force training environment utilizing standard weapons 

systems carried by SF personnel. These weapons systems include the M-4 carbine, M-9 pistol 

and the M-249 light machine gun. The CCMCK munitions do not require a specific range, and 

the US Air Force has certified them as safe for use inside facilities. In addition, these kits 

significantly improve combat skills that directly result in a more secure area of operations.

2. Source of Need. AFI 36-2646 Security Forces Training and Standardization Evaluation 

Program, as amended by Air Force Guidance Memorandum (AFGM) 2, 21 Mar 2013;

AFI 31-101 Integrated Defense; AFI 31-201 Security Forces Standards and Procedures;

Department of Homeland Security Active Shooter Guidelines; National Summit on Multiple 

Casualty Shootings; Lessons Learned from Domestic Operations and Operations ENDURING 

FREEDOM (OEF), IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) and NEW DAWN (OND); 2011-2013 ARC 

WEPTAC Critical Capability.

3. Units Impacted. All 96 SF squadrons will be impacted within the 54 states and territories.

4. Program Details. PEC: 52625F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

5380 M-4 CCMC Kits (3080) $531 $2,856,780

5380 M-9 CCMC Kits(3080) $390 $2,098,200

744 M-249 CCMC Kits (3080) $835 $621,240

Total $6,334,800
175

Winning the Battle – Lessons Learned and the Way Ahead

Agile Combat Support

SECURITY FORCES SMALL ARMS RANGE SOLUTIONS

1. Background. The Air National Guard (ANG) owns 12 small arms ranges costing in excess 

of $1,000,000 per year for maintenance and sustainment. Four of these have been closed due to 

non-compliance with the surface and vertical danger zones as outlined in the Air Force Policy 

Directive (AFPD) Engineering Technical Letter (ETL) 11-18, “Small Arms Range Design and 

Construction.” The conditions of these small arms ranges continue to deteriorate over time due 

to their age and frequent use and are in constant need of repair. The costs to maintain the current 

ranges outweigh the benefits of sustaining these ranges. Additionally, the ETL states that if 

major range or component repairs of an existing range will cost more than 50 percent of an 

estimated range replacement cost, the entire facility must be upgraded to comply with this ETL. 

With only eight ranges in operation within the ANG, Security Forces (SF) personnel rely heavily 

upon other agencies to utilize small arms range space in order to prepare SF personnel for their 

wartime mission. This drives scheduling conflicts and expenses for the use of other small arms 

ranges, both civilian and military. Every ANG airman is required to meet small arms training 

requirements prior to deployment in support of overseas contingency operations, as well as 

maintain small arms proficiency in support of the homeland defense mission. The limited 

number of training ranges affects all ANG warfighters. As the Office of Primary Responsibility 

(OPR) for small arms ranges, ANG SF Combat Arms Training and Maintenance (CATM) 

personnel are tasked with the small arms training of all members of the ANG at every 

installation. The procurement of a modular small arms range at select ANG installations 

increases the number of ANG warfighters able to complete the required small arms training to 

meet mission requirements.

2. Source of Need. AFPD 32-10 Installations and Facilities ETL 11-18 Small Arms Range 

Design and Construction in accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32-1023 Designing and 

Constructing Military Construction Projects; AFI 36-2226 Combat Arms Program; Lessons 

Learned from Domestic Operations and Operations ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF), IRAQI 

FREEDOM (OIF) and NEW DAWN (OND); 2012 ARC WEPTAC Critical Requirement.

3. Units Impacted. 

105 AW Fort Stewart, NY 142 FW Portland IAP, OR 154 WG Hickam AFB, HI

114 FW Sioux Falls RAP, SD 147 RW Ellington IAP, TX 156 AW Luis Munoz IAP, PR

118 WG Nashville IAP, TN 148 FW Duluth IAP, MN 183 FW Lincoln Capital IAP, IL

123 AW Louisville IAP, KY 152AW Reno-Tahoe IAP, NV CRTC Alpena, MI

4. Program Details. PEC: 52625F

Remaining Quantity Required Unit Cost Program Cost

12 Modular Small Arms Ranges (3080) $4,510,000 $54,120,000

Total $54,120,000