APPENDIX A-1 

United States Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality 

System Quick Look: Pennsylvania (1999-2008) 

 (provided in electronic form only) 

Bureau of Air Quality 

Department of Environmental Protection 
This page blank for copying purposes. 
UNITES STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

QUICKLOOK CRITERIA PARAMETERS

Report Request ID: 685338 Report Code: AMP450 Oct. 15, 2009

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: VSH

State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

42

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

CRITERIA 88101 7

SELECTED OPTIONS

EVENTS PROCESSING

MERGE PDF FILES

Option Type Option Value

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

YES

SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Order Column

PARAMETER_CODE

STATE_CODE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

POC

DATES

EDT_ID

GLOBAL DATES

1999

Start Date End Date

2008

Tribal
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 1 of 45

EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES

EDT DESCRIPTION

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

NO EVENTS

EVENTS EXCLUDED

EVENTS INCLUDED

EXCEPTIONAL EVENTS EXCLUDED

NATURAL EVENTS EXCLUDED

EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED

EXCEPTIONAL EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED

NATURAL EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 2 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0021

0021

0021

0021

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

118

118

118

118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

118

118

118

44.9

54.1

60.9

50.6

61.6

43.5

47.3

47.9

43.1

45.2

62.2

37.1

54.2

54.4

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

34.0

36.5

36.0

38.9

36.5

36.3

35.8

33.6

30.7

30.5

31.7

34.1

41.7

41.4

268

311

349

332

330

358

348

360

330

340

75

255

341

347

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

41.1

46.1

45.5

50.3

45.8

43.3

46.7

43.7

39.7

41.1

31.7

35.5

49.4

51.7

36.5

43.0

43.0

45.3

42.2

40.3

45.2

39.5

38.3

38.7

31.5

35.3

47.7

48.4

35.2

39.2

39.5

44.2

41.5

39.5

38.0

36.2

32.6

31.3

30.2

35.1

46.0

45.1

13.12*

13.02*

14.06 

12.63 

13.56 

13.68 

13.56 

11.82 

12.31 

11.45 

16.23*

15.63*

16.58 

15.33 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 3 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0021

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG 

#7

GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

63.9

52.1

60.5

55.1

50.7

39.7

58.2

36.8

39.1

37.5

64.3

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

5

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

35.9

38.3

42.5

37.6

39.8

30.3

38.3

35.7

33.2

35.0

39.1

352

348

358

357

341

352

57

59

55

58

82

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

59.2

47.4

60.4

51.5

47.7

38.3

38.3

35.7

33.2

35.0

39.1

41.0

44.1

53.8

49.3

45.9

35.2

27.8

28.6

31.6

32.0

38.8

39.5

43.9

48.1

43.1

45.7

34.6

27.7

27.7

31.0

29.4

35.2

15.20 

15.46 

15.82 

14.40 

14.89 

12.87 

16.21 

13.82 

15.47 

13.03 

16.57*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 4 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0021

42-003-0021

42-003-0021

42-003-0021

42-003-0021

42-003-0021

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

35.0

57.0

49.0

54.9

53.8

57.7

60.5

78.5

98.6

69.6

101.7

94.0

100.3

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

33.7

56.3

40.2

30.7

39.7

35.1

49.3

64.2

63.9

59.9

66.6

68.5

69.6

99

108

115

108

108

112

190

328

337

355

359

350

355

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

33.7

56.3

43.3

40.0

44.6

38.3

58.4

71.1

90.2

63.4

85.2

82.2

84.9

33.1

40.7

40.2

30.7

39.7

35.1

58.0

70.2

81.0

62.6

80.4

71.5

83.1

32.9

40.7

36.2

28.1

36.4

34.7

49.3

68.6

71.9

61.9

76.1

71.3

77.8

14.85*

15.81*

14.55 

14.56 

14.10 

15.35 

18.80*

20.92 

23.05 

20.30 

20.21 

20.66 

21.41 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 5 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

2743 

Washington 

Blvd

OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH 

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH 

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH 

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE 

2006

2007

2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

100.7

61.7

70.8

85.6

52.3

56.9

59.2

56.4

34.2

50.5

49.7

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

58.4

54.7

50.0

84.2

49.9

49.3

47.7

37.0

32.0

37.0

47.6

345

359

358

54

60

57

55

71

83

98

105

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

82.1

58.7

66.9

84.2

49.9

49.3

47.7

37.0

32.0

37.0

47.6

68.0

58.7

63.2

63.7

48.6

42.7

46.5

28.6

32.0

32.6

37.0

60.6

58.0

62.7

48.2

48.5

41.0

46.2

28.0

30.7

32.4

31.6

19.03 

18.88 

17.00 

23.18*

17.73 

19.60 

17.98 

14.98*

14.09*

14.04*

12.31*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 6 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

McCandless 

Township

McCandless 

Township

McCandless 

Township

McCandless 

Township

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

ROAD, SOUTH 

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH 

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH 

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH 

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH 

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH 

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH 

FAYETTE

PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH 

PARK

PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH 

PARK

PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH 

PARK

PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH 

PARK

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

52.0

47.2

48.9

29.3

43.6

30.8

26.3

33.9

37.9

57.9

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

42.1

42.2

34.1

28.6

42.4

25.5

26.3

33.9

37.9

52.5

99

101

110

98

98

108

17

43

48

56

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

42.1

42.2

37.0

28.6

42.4

30.5

22.4

32.8

36.0

52.5

37.7

35.6

34.1

28.0

40.7

25.5

20.8

31.7

35.0

29.4

29.9

30.3

32.8

27.8

37.6

24.7

20.5

29.7

33.4

25.4

13.23*

13.00*

14.22 

11.14*

13.47*

10.77 

11.99*

14.49*

14.87*

13.63 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 7 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

McCandless 

Township

McCandless 

Township

McCandless 

Township

McCandless 

Township

McCandless 

Township

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH 

PARK

PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH 

PARK

PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH 

PARK

PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH 

PARK

PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH 

PARK

1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD 

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD 

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD 

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD 

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD 

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD 

CORAOPOLIS PA

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

56.6

47.2

50.7

37.2

39.6

54.2

31.1

38.4

50.0

53.7

46.7

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

56.6

47.2

50.7

37.2

32.9

54.2

31.1

38.4

46.2

38.6

46.6

50

48

49

46

55

27

36

45

55

53

52

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

30.5

43.6

41.3

28.6

32.9

30.3

27.5

31.7

46.2

38.6

46.6

26.6

32.7

27.8

27.2

28.7

29.0

25.5

30.2

30.2

30.2

31.0

26.1

31.7

25.4

20.0

27.5

25.9

22.4

30.1

29.3

28.3

30.2

13.96*

12.28*

14.44*

11.50*

13.02 

15.63*

13.38*

15.33*

13.63*

15.71 

13.26 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 8 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0097

42-003-0097

42-003-0116

42-003-0116

42-003-0116

42-003-0116

42-003-0116

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Not in a city

Not in a city

Stowe 

(Township of)

Stowe 

(Township of)

Stowe 

(Township of)

Stowe 

(Township of)

Stowe 

(Township of)

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD 

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD 

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD 

CORAOPOLIS PA

BEAVER ROAD 

LEETSDALE

BEAVER ROAD 

LEETSDALE

405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES 

ROCKS, PA 

15132

405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES 

ROCKS, PA 

15132

405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES 

ROCKS, PA 

15132

405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES 

ROCKS, PA 

15132

405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES 

ROCKS, PA 

15132

2005

2006

2007

1999

2000

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

45.2

47.2

40.7

46.8

39.3

60.1

35.7

53.2

40.5

59.9

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

37.0

36.7

32.8

46.8

39.3

50.0

33.2

51.7

38.4

42.9

56

53

56

18

38

84

94

107

107

108

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

37.0

36.7

32.8

25.9

32.2

50.0

33.2

51.7

38.4

45.9

27.9

36.6

28.8

25.2

27.3

34.2

32.0

44.5

36.4

42.9

27.7

29.3

28.2

24.5

27.0

32.8

31.3

37.6

33.1

37.8

14.67 

12.38 

13.64 

21.20*

15.22*

16.99*

15.39*

15.59*

14.20 

15.28 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 9 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0116

42-003-0116

42-003-0131

42-003-0131

42-003-0131

42-003-0131

42-003-0131

42-003-0133

42-003-0133

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

Stowe 

(Township of)

Stowe 

(Township of)

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Elizabeth

Elizabeth

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES 

ROCKS, PA 

15132

405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES 

ROCKS, PA 

15132

WAVE 

POOL,SOUTH 

PARK, SOUTH 

PARK TWP, PA

WAVE 

POOL,SOUTH 

PARK, SOUTH 

PARK TWP, PA

WAVE 

POOL,SOUTH 

PARK, SOUTH 

PARK TWP, PA

WAVE 

POOL,SOUTH 

PARK, SOUTH 

PARK TWP, PA

WAVE 

POOL,SOUTH 

PARK, SOUTH 

PARK TWP, PA

5118 DORRIS 

DRIVE, 

ELIZABETH

5118 DORRIS 

DRIVE, 

2004

2005

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2003

2004

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

57.6

54.8

67.4

36.4

40.6

48.6

16.2

53.9

61.1

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

45.5

39.3

67.4

36.4

40.6

33.0

16.2

53.9

36.1

112

106

25

48

50

51

6

49

58

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

47.9

44.1

36.0

33.2

35.3

33.0

12.1

35.6

36.1

45.5

39.3

33.4

32.7

33.3

27.3

11.4

29.9

35.6

40.4

33.5

31.4

31.7

32.2

25.5

10.7

28.9

33.5

14.68*

16.15 

17.93*

14.48*

14.85*

13.51 

9.98*

14.44 

13.52 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 10 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0133

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

Elizabeth

Harrison 

Township

Harrison 

Township

Harrison 

Township

Harrison 

Township

Harrison 

Township

Harrison 

Township

Harrison 

Township

Harrison 

Township

Harrison 

Township

Harrison 

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

ELIZABETH

5118 DORRIS 

DRIVE, 

ELIZABETH

PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, 

NATRONA

PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, 

NATRONA

PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, 

NATRONA

PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, 

NATRONA

PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, 

NATRONA

PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, 

NATRONA

PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, 

NATRONA

PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, 

NATRONA

PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, 

NATRONA

PACIFIC & 

2005

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

27.7

70.8

42.4

60.2

57.0

55.9

49.4

50.8

44.4

51.8

41.3

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

27.7

40.3

41.6

48.1

46.2

41.9

45.4

41.3

37.8

39.9

32.1

49

81

102

99

120

111

85

118

103

111

107

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

27.3

40.3

41.6

48.1

53.3

44.5

45.4

41.5

38.9

43.9

39.2

25.6

40.3

38.4

39.9

46.2

41.9

38.5

41.3

37.8

39.9

32.1

25.1

39.6

37.1

38.9

41.9

36.5

36.9

37.8

31.3

38.4

31.4

14.04 

17.45*

16.09*

16.11*

16.09 

15.50 

15.02*

15.95 

14.03 

15.06 

13.39 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 11 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

Township

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

IDAHO AVE, 

NATRONA

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

68.9

40.8

57.2

59.3

65.3

54.8

60.9

41.5

50.0

38.4

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

39.7

39.7

51.7

41.9

50.4

38.3

38.6

38.1

43.7

36.3

79

88

109

114

104

107

111

104

110

105

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

39.7

39.7

51.7

42.2

50.4

44.2

39.6

40.0

47.0

37.3

38.8

36.9

44.7

41.9

38.3

38.3

38.6

38.1

43.7

36.3

36.1

36.5

41.7

41.3

36.0

37.0

37.0

36.4

43.1

36.2

17.69*

16.45*

17.09*

16.92 

16.80*

15.79 

17.16 

15.03 

16.38 

14.15 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 12 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-9002

42-003-9002

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

North 

Braddock

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Springdale

Springdale

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. 

BRADDOCK

501 Waddell 

Ave

501 Waddell 

Ave

501 Waddell 

Ave

501 Waddell 

Ave

501 Waddell 

Ave

501 Waddell 

Ave

501 Waddell 

Ave

501 Waddell 

Ave

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX 

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

2005

2006

2007

2008

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

61.5

41.7

42.5

38.5

47.2

51.6

59.3

43.2

57.3

38.7

40.4

40.6

72.8

33.4

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

61.5

39.5

35.4

37.7

44.5

50.4

58.8

39.8

30.9

35.8

35.0

34.6

72.8

33.4

50

56

53

56

55

56

60

55

57

59

55

58

43

51

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

37.5

39.5

35.4

37.7

44.5

50.4

58.8

39.8

30.9

35.8

35.0

34.6

38.0

32.8

36.0

37.8

33.5

36.3

37.9

39.8

37.0

36.2

29.1

29.1

31.8

30.7

34.2

32.6

32.5

30.2

31.5

30.9

36.5

37.5

30.7

33.1

27.6

28.4

30.0

29.3

31.5

32.0

18.24*

15.45 

16.73 

14.21 

18.65*

16.00 

17.02 

13.80 

16.36 

14.49 

15.11 

13.32 

16.48*

14.76 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 13 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-9002

42-003-9002

42-003-9002

42-003-9002

42-003-9002

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Springdale

Springdale

Springdale

Springdale

Springdale

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

HIGH, COLFAX 

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX 

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX 

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX 

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX 

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX 

& BUTLER

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

41.9

56.7

58.6

45.6

50.6

45.5

61.7

58.4

55.4

43.6

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

41.9

52.8

33.4

41.4

38.8

43.6

49.3

37.7

33.8

43.0

51

55

57

57

55

99

102

119

115

119

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

33.4

52.8

33.4

41.4

38.8

43.6

50.0

46.2

35.2

43.1

32.7

34.3

31.0

32.3

27.9

36.7

49.3

37.7

33.8

43.0

32.6

28.8

29.1

32.2

26.1

35.7

42.4

35.9

32.2

42.9

14.84*

13.92*

15.95 

12.49 

14.88 

16.14*

17.19*

15.26 

15.67 

15.38 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 14 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

61.9

41.1

38.9

37.2

18.1

35.6

9.9

24.2

18.1

51.4

47.8

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

51.8

37.0

38.2

31.2

18.1

35.6

9.9

24.2

18.1

51.4

33.6

109

107

99

114

6

10

1

2

3

48

53

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

53.6

39.0

38.2

32.4

17.8

33.6

9.0

14.3

30.4

33.6

51.8

37.0

37.6

31.2

12.8

20.4

6.4

28.1

33.3

39.5

33.5

36.4

30.4

11.6

18.0

28.0

31.0

18.30 

14.87 

15.72*

13.69 

11.53*

16.25*

9.90*

16.60*

12.93*

16.64*

15.00 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 15 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Reading

Reading

Reading

Reading

Reading

Reading

Reading

Beaver

Beaver

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER 

ALLEY

UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT 

ST

UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT 

ST

UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT 

ST

UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT 

ST

UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT 

ST

UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT 

ST

UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT 

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

36.3

36.9

36.3

55.2

55.2

52.4

76.1

41.2

45.7

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

35.3

36.9

35.7

37.5

43.0

48.5

45.0

33.1

39.4

58

48

91

113

120

108

119

114

118

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

35.3

30.9

35.7

47.4

44.0

48.5

46.5

37.5

43.0

31.2

29.3

32.5

37.5

43.0

48.5

45.0

33.1

39.4

30.2

28.5

30.4

37.2

42.5

40.3

44.5

33.1

38.1

16.55 

14.26*

13.51*

16.87 

16.49 

16.66*

16.14 

15.64 

16.80 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 16 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-011-0009

42-011-0010

42-011-0010

42-011-0011

42-011-0011

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Reading

Reading

Reading

Not in a city

Not in a city

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Johnstown

Johnstown

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Cambria

Cambria

ST

UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT 

ST

503 NORTH 6TH

STREET

503 NORTH 6TH

STREET

1059 Arnold 

Road

1059 Arnold 

Road

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 

MESSENGER ST

2006

2006

2007

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

36.9

49.5

43.6

36.5

36.5

33.3

39.3

47.9

49.7

55.9

39.8

37.7

38.6

37.3

37.5

52.6

38.3

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

36.9

39.4

43.6

33.9

28.4

32.8

38.4

38.5

37.2

39.6

29.9

35.4

34.2

35.0

30.9

31.0

34.1

43

71

47

60

116

67

100

117

110

113

108

110

104

103

103

80

101

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

31.9

39.4

36.2

33.9

30.4

32.8

38.4

42.5

40.6

40.9

30.4

37.1

38.2

35.9

36.7

31.0

35.4

31.4

35.1

28.1

33.7

28.4

30.2

36.6

38.5

37.2

39.6

29.9

35.4

34.2

35.0

30.9

30.7

34.1

31.0

33.3

26.5

28.1

27.4

28.0

35.7

33.2

37.0

37.4

28.7

35.3

32.5

30.5

29.6

29.3

30.4

12.17*

14.87*

13.26*

15.28*

12.48 

12.00*

13.64*

14.47 

14.15 

14.42 

13.04*

14.34 

12.15*

13.02*

12.66*

14.78*

15.34*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 17 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

State College

State College

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Centre

Centre

MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 

MESSENGER ST

PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - 

ARBORETUM 

SITE

PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - 

ARBORETUM 

SITE

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

42.8

54.3

54.7

52.4

44.9

41.6

36.3

36.4

39.7

53.5

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

40.1

46.6

36.8

36.2

43.2

39.0

34.6

32.2

34.0

41.4

112

120

116

116

118

116

108

122

70

311

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

42.1

54.2

40.9

37.7

44.1

39.3

34.7

32.6

34.0

47.3

40.1

46.6

36.8

36.2

43.2

39.0

34.6

32.2

31.3

47.1

39.4

40.2

36.3

34.9

39.6

33.4

33.5

31.9

25.6

46.0

15.85 

16.09 

15.46 

14.42 

16.80 

14.78 

14.42*

13.86 

11.71*

13.72 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 18 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-029-0100

42-029-0100

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

State College

State College

State College

State College

State College

State College

State College

Not in a city

Not in a city

Centre

Centre

Centre

Centre

Centre

Centre

Centre

Chester

Chester

PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - 

ARBORETUM 

SITE

PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - 

ARBORETUM 

SITE

PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - 

ARBORETUM 

SITE

PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - 

ARBORETUM 

SITE

PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - 

ARBORETUM 

SITE

PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - 

ARBORETUM 

SITE

PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - 

ARBORETUM 

SITE

NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - 

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - 

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2002

2003

118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

118

93.7

62.5

48.1

49.1

43.5

44.2

37.6

54.9

73.1

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

36.4

35.4

37.8

39.7

31.7

33.1

29.7

33.7

38.5

260

344

348

344

352

358

359

110

118

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

51.3

44.0

45.5

48.6

39.7

41.2

35.9

33.8

42.2

42.2

43.7

44.9

42.4

39.5

36.3

35.0

33.7

38.5

39.4

43.4

40.7

42.1

39.2

36.2

32.9

33.7

37.7

11.78*

13.56 

13.33 

13.39 

11.38 

11.93 

10.79 

14.61 

15.57 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 19 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-029-0100

42-029-0100

42-029-0100

42-029-0100

42-029-0100

42-041-0100

42-041-0100

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Carlisle

Carlisle

Carlisle

Carlisle

Carlisle

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - 

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - 

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - 

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - 

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - 

TOUGHKENAMON

210 NORTH 

MIDDLESEX 

ROAD

210 NORTH 

MIDDLESEX 

ROAD

IMPERIAL 

COURT

IMPERIAL 

COURT

IMPERIAL 

COURT

IMPERIAL 

COURT

IMPERIAL 

COURT

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

40.5

41.2

41.6

42.2

38.5

54.7

59.4

65.5

53.2

66.7

55.4

43.1

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

32.7

33.7

38.3

38.1

32.0

37.3

52.4

36.1

41.5

41.6

39.1

40.1

101

93

92

92

102

289

86

260

344

349

343

345

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

38.9

33.7

38.3

38.1

36.7

41.4

52.4

45.0

51.8

47.0

45.2

43.0

32.7

33.3

31.2

32.9

32.0

40.2

49.0

43.3

47.5

46.5

43.1

42.5

30.6

33.0

31.1

30.6

28.7

39.7

48.6

38.2

47.1

43.5

39.8

42.1

14.25*

15.87*

12.59*

14.07*

13.68*

13.97*

17.55*

14.30 

14.35 

15.31 

15.13 

14.93 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 20 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Carlisle

Carlisle

Carlisle

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

IMPERIAL 

COURT

IMPERIAL 

COURT

IMPERIAL 

COURT

1833 UPS 

DRIVE 

HARRISBURG 

PA

1833 UPS 

DRIVE 

HARRISBURG 

PA

1833 UPS 

DRIVE 

HARRISBURG 

PA

1833 UPS 

DRIVE 

HARRISBURG 

PA

1833 UPS 

DRIVE 

HARRISBURG 

PA

1833 UPS 

DRIVE 

HARRISBURG 

PA

1833 UPS 

DRIVE 

HARRISBURG 

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

145

145

53.3

43.5

46.0

49.7

65.9

61.7

52.6

70.9

55.7

52.1

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

33.3

35.3

33.7

39.7

45.8

47.7

40.1

41.5

35.5

40.1

335

329

355

244

283

350

348

336

354

338

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

43.8

37.7

42.4

43.5

58.5

58.6

52.5

56.7

46.7

49.9

42.9

36.8

36.8

40.7

49.4

52.0

48.9

48.5

45.9

42.9

34.8

36.5

36.7

40.4

47.9

50.5

45.8

47.1

43.8

41.0

13.00 

13.70 

13.03 

14.39*

15.69*

16.50 

14.50 

16.18 

15.66 

15.51 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 21 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

PA

1833 UPS 

DRIVE 

HARRISBURG 

PA

1833 UPS 

DRIVE 

HARRISBURG 

PA

1833 UPS 

DRIVE 

HARRISBURG 

PA

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

145

145

145

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

51.9

41.6

43.7

37.2

46.9

47.2

58.1

64.4

38.8

40.9

38.6

37.4

36.5

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

37.0

35.6

34.3

35.9

36.2

39.5

31.9

37.8

30.5

37.0

36.7

34.5

28.6

346

335

347

94

112

118

115

115

113

110

102

96

105

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

48.0

39.9

43.2

35.9

44.9

42.7

40.1

40.5

37.5

40.1

38.0

34.5

35.0

44.5

37.9

39.8

31.6

36.2

39.5

31.9

37.8

30.5

37.0

36.7

34.0

28.6

43.8

37.1

38.7

29.3

34.2

38.8

30.7

37.0

30.5

36.9

31.9

33.6

28.2

13.95 

14.28 

13.18 

13.12*

15.99 

15.86 

14.73 

15.29 

15.02 

16.51 

13.99*

14.45 

13.84 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 22 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

145

26.2

20.0

11.6

36.1

13.2

39.5

38.6

31.9

39.5

30.5

37.5

49.3

52.8

46.4

38.7

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

26.2

20.0

11.6

36.1

13.2

39.3

32.9

26.1

28.2

30.5

28.2

37.5

42.9

29.7

32.5

6

2

2

13

2

51

52

56

51

38

59

264

299

265

357

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

19.7

7.6

11.6

34.5

4.4

39.3

32.9

26.1

28.2

27.6

28.2

41.5

49.9

38.0

37.1

14.6

21.5

36.1

27.4

25.8

26.8

24.6

27.3

40.2

44.7

32.1

36.1

8.2

15.7

35.8

26.9

25.3

25.8

23.6

26.1

38.9

44.6

31.8

35.9

13.25*

13.80*

11.60*

23.71*

8.80*

16.91*

14.41 

15.02 

14.09*

12.62*

13.99*

13.83*

13.21*

12.56*

11.88 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 23 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

145

145

145

145

118

118

118

118

118

145

72.3

37.0

41.1

64.9

58.0

43.1

49.3

54.2

57.9

47.2

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

40.7

30.2

35.1

28.8

29.7

31.5

36.7

42.7

33.8

31.2

338

296

316

341

259

343

337

344

342

343

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

48.0

36.0

40.2

35.2

39.8

39.0

43.0

53.4

48.3

36.5

47.5

33.0

39.8

34.2

37.4

38.9

39.8

50.2

41.4

33.1

44.6

32.9

38.1

32.6

31.2

33.0

39.5

46.8

38.8

33.0

14.35 

11.32*

12.06 

10.72 

11.00*

11.67 

12.73 

12.45 

12.46 

11.60 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 24 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lancaster

Lancaster

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND 

CITY OF 

SCRANTON

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001

2003

1999

2000

145

145

145

145

118

118

118

118

118

49.9

47.4

44.4

38.2

21.2

16.4

8.2

46.1

67.2

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

32.8

28.7

32.0

27.7

21.2

16.4

8.2

38.2

47.4

341

333

334

349

4

4

3

89

98

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

42.2

38.3

40.4

35.2

14.8

15.3

5.7

38.2

47.4

40.8

35.6

36.6

32.9

10.4

10.6

5.5

34.5

47.0

38.5

34.1

35.6

28.0

9.0

6.0

33.6

41.1

12.49 

10.61 

11.28 

10.06 

12.70*

11.78*

6.47*

15.64*

18.22*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 25 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

58.4

51.3

71.6

43.6

57.5

55.8

42.9

42.8

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

42.1

40.2

51.5

35.5

45.2

34.9

39.6

35.0

114

115

119

120

121

117

117

114

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

49.9

47.8

55.7

35.9

49.0

41.0

41.3

39.2

42.1

40.2

51.5

35.5

45.2

34.9

39.6

35.0

40.2

35.5

46.9

35.4

41.2

34.5

37.2

34.7

17.11 

16.15 

17.62 

16.64 

18.19 

14.11 

15.40 

13.93 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 26 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-077-0004

42-077-0004

42-077-0004

42-077-0004

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Allentown

Allentown

Allentown

Allentown

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lehigh

Lehigh

Lehigh

Lehigh

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR 

HIGH 

GROFFTOWN RD

STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER 

AVE

STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER 

AVE

STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER 

AVE

STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER 

2000

2001

2002

2003

1999

2000

2001

2002

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

29.3

33.7

15.9

25.2

35.0

57.2

70.5

50.1

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

29.3

33.7

15.9

25.2

31.5

38.2

42.8

38.9

10

5

1

2

185

322

317

318

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

25.6

26.9

9.5

34.6

46.3

55.0

45.0

22.2

20.2

32.0

44.0

54.7

42.4

17.4

9.6

31.5

43.6

54.4

41.3

15.51*

17.42*

15.90*

17.35*

11.89*

14.26 

15.10*

13.15*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 27 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-077-0004

42-077-0004

42-077-0004

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Allentown

Allentown

Allentown

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Lehigh

Lehigh

Lehigh

Luzerne

Luzerne

Luzerne

Luzerne

Luzerne

Luzerne

Luzerne

AVE

STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER 

AVE

STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER 

AVE

STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER 

AVE

CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON 

STS

CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON 

STS

CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON 

STS

CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON 

STS

CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON 

STS

CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON 

STS

CHILWICK & 

2003

2004

2005

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

118

145

145

118

118

118

118

118

145

145

69.3

53.6

55.4

50.6

43.0

52.6

44.2

69.6

45.5

48.4

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

36.6

35.9

36.7

32.8

32.9

37.4

28.2

35.1

30.8

31.5

307

358

351

252

345

347

293

350

347

356

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

46.4

42.1

47.7

50.4

42.8

49.3

39.2

61.9

36.9

41.4

44.9

39.6

45.8

40.0

41.1

46.7

37.8

41.4

36.3

38.4

44.2

37.2

44.6

37.8

34.5

39.5

36.9

40.9

35.6

36.9

15.02*

14.03 

14.48 

12.54*

12.65 

13.71 

11.99*

13.06 

12.21 

13.01 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 28 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-091-0013

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Norristown

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Montgomery

WASHINGTON 

STS

PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) 

& PA418

PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) 

& PA418

PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) 

& PA418

PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) 

& PA418

PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) 

& PA418

PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) 

& PA418

PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) 

& PA418

PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) 

& PA418

PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) 

& PA418

STATE ARMORY 

- 1046 

BELVOIR RD

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

118

118

118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

34.9

55.0

50.5

54.9

39.3

53.2

38.6

42.0

40.2

35.3

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

30.3

43.9

36.6

35.4

34.5

39.0

30.7

34.9

30.3

31.3

53

310

327

331

346

340

302

335

334

78

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

30.3

51.0

49.6

53.3

37.7

46.9

35.4

41.8

33.7

31.3

29.9

46.2

39.9

47.1

36.9

45.9

34.2

40.9

33.0

30.2

28.1

45.9

39.1

38.8

35.1

42.6

33.7

36.8

32.8

29.8

14.72*

15.07*

14.02 

13.77 

13.37 

14.09 

11.84*

13.16 

11.61 

13.02*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 29 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Northampton

Northampton

STATE ARMORY 

- 1046 

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY 

- 1046 

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY 

- 1046 

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY 

- 1046 

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY 

- 1046 

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY 

- 1046 

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY 

- 1046 

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY 

- 1046 

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY 

- 1046 

BELVOIR RD

WASHINGTON & 

CAMBRIA STS. 

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON & 

CAMBRIA STS. 

FREEMANSBURG

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

39.6

59.0

49.7

64.0

39.3

35.2

39.0

39.7

37.2

36.0

52.3

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

31.5

47.6

36.8

37.5

28.8

32.0

36.4

30.1

23.7

31.3

37.3

106

115

118

111

102

86

109

112

109

180

298

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

37.5

49.7

37.4

43.9

29.3

32.0

36.6

35.7

30.3

34.7

44.0

31.5

47.6

36.8

37.5

28.8

31.5

36.4

30.1

23.7

32.5

40.9

30.0

38.0

33.6

33.6

27.0

30.3

29.9

28.2

23.5

31.3

39.0

13.47*

14.88 

13.60 

13.86 

12.00*

12.48*

12.05 

13.09 

11.66 

12.85*

13.69*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 30 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-099-0301

42-099-0301

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Not in a city

Not in a city

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Perry

Perry

WASHINGTON & 

CAMBRIA STS. 

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON & 

CAMBRIA STS. 

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON & 

CAMBRIA STS. 

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON & 

CAMBRIA STS. 

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON & 

CAMBRIA STS. 

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON & 

CAMBRIA STS. 

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON & 

CAMBRIA STS. 

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON & 

CAMBRIA STS. 

FREEMANSBURG

ROUTE 34 

LITTLE 

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

ROUTE 34 

LITTLE 

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001

118

118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

118

73.5

59.7

65.9

54.5

55.9

42.7

46.2

40.4

34.2

35.1

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

42.9

40.9

37.0

35.2

36.2

38.3

37.9

33.1

30.2

33.7

317

334

351

351

348

342

347

360

110

116

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

61.7

46.5

49.9

41.6

48.1

41.0

42.7

40.1

32.0

34.7

55.7

46.2

47.4

39.4

45.9

40.4

40.4

39.2

30.2

33.7

50.9

46.2

45.5

38.5

44.4

39.6

39.9

37.4

26.4

31.5

15.33 

14.10 

14.31 

13.71 

14.20 

12.75 

13.31 

12.26 

12.34 

12.57 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 31 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-099-0301

42-099-0301

42-099-0301

42-099-0301

42-101-0003

42-101-0003

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Perry

Perry

Perry

Perry

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

ROUTE 34 

LITTLE 

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

ROUTE 34 

LITTLE 

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

ROUTE 34 

LITTLE 

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

ROUTE 34 

LITTLE 

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

COMM HEALTH 

SERVICES 500 

S BROAD 

STREET

COMM HEALTH 

SERVICES 500 

S BROAD 

STREET

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

2002

2003

2004

2005

2005

2006

1999

2000

2001

118

118

118

118

120

120

120

000

000

47.2

58.7

35.4

36.4

29.1

31.7

50.5

48.0

48.9

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

36.9

34.5

27.9

29.0

29.0

28.8

38.9

41.2

40.2

115

109

121

118

62

111

233

285

325

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

40.8

38.0

28.2

29.0

29.0

29.1

46.9

46.7

48.2

36.9

34.5

27.9

29.0

27.9

28.8

42.3

45.4

45.9

33.6

31.8

27.4

28.2

27.0

27.8

40.4

42.5

45.5

13.22 

13.09*

12.23 

13.12 

14.35*

10.47*

14.64*

14.93*

16.47 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 32 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0014

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

1

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE 

AMS LAB

ROXY WATER 

PUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2006

2007

2008

2002

120

000

000

000

145

145

145

120

000

145

120

53.9

58.6

50.2

48.3

42.0

40.9

40.8

40.3

35.6

39.8

30.2

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

39.7

39.9

34.3

35.9

37.9

35.4

34.5

35.5

35.6

33.4

30.2

331

322

335

268

275

332

354

57

47

54

16

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

45.4

51.5

40.1

47.8

40.8

38.9

40.1

35.5

31.8

33.4

27.1

43.3

48.0

38.2

39.1

40.5

37.6

38.1

28.0

26.3

21.9

24.2

43.2

40.7

37.6

37.0

40.0

36.9

37.7

28.0

26.0

20.9

24.2

14.38 

14.80 

13.89 

14.21*

13.48*

13.74 

13.01 

13.22 

14.07*

12.51 

14.54*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 33 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0014

42-101-0014

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

ROXY WATER 

PUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS

ROXY WATER 

PUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS

FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT 

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT 

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT 

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT 

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT 

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT 

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT 

2003

2004

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

120

120

120

120

120

120

120

120

120

60.7

15.3

40.3

41.9

46.7

53.8

48.4

41.5

33.4

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

39.3

15.3

29.8

31.8

36.1

34.4

39.3

29.3

33.4

73

5

81

91

104

116

108

110

19

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

39.3

12.7

29.8

31.8

37.7

39.7

39.9

40.1

26.5

34.4

11.1

29.8

26.9

36.1

34.4

39.3

29.3

21.3

31.6

10.8

28.9

26.7

34.3

31.6

35.1

29.0

21.3

13.25*

11.12*

13.30*

14.71*

15.39*

13.76 

13.67 

13.88*

15.51*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 34 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0027

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

PLANT

GRANT-ASHTON 

ROADS PHILA 

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON 

ROADS PHILA 

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON 

ROADS PHILA 

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON 

ROADS PHILA 

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON 

ROADS PHILA 

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON 

ROADS PHILA 

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON 

ROADS PHILA 

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON 

ROADS PHILA 

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON 

ROADS PHILA 

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON 

ROADS PHILA 

NE AIRPORT

S W CORNER 

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

120

120

120

120

120

120

000

145

145

145

120

35.9

40.1

51.8

52.8

55.6

50.1

48.2

46.9

40.8

39.4

56.8

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

32.5

37.5

37.1

33.7

38.7

33.4

35.8

34.7

33.5

30.5

56.8

64

95

118

113

108

333

229

255

321

356

47

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

32.5

37.5

39.6

38.2

40.9

41.1

44.8

42.6

40.4

38.2

37.3

28.3

32.2

37.1

33.7

38.7

37.7

38.4

39.0

35.6

37.2

36.1

26.0

27.5

35.1

33.7

32.7

37.6

36.1

36.1

34.9

34.7

33.8

12.95*

14.66*

14.62 

13.66 

13.19*

12.78 

12.93*

12.40*

12.85*

11.99 

23.40*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 35 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

BROAD AND 

BUTLER

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

120

120

120

120

120

120

120

145

41.8

42.7

46.8

58.8

56.5

38.4

40.0

63.0

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

33.3

39.0

39.6

36.2

42.3

31.5

39.4

38.5

76

91

108

106

70

108

85

199

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

33.3

39.0

40.1

38.7

42.3

37.7

39.4

48.0

32.4

34.2

39.6

36.2

38.3

31.5

36.9

41.8

32.1

31.4

37.1

34.5

36.9

30.0

32.9

38.5

15.53*

17.14*

16.98 

15.57*

16.13*

14.39*

15.06*

15.52*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 36 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0052

42-101-0055

42-101-0057

42-101-0057

42-101-0057

42-101-0057

42-101-0136

1

1

4

4

1

1

1

1

4

4

1

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET 

- PARKING 

LOT(CHS

1439 EAST 

PASSYUNK 

AVENUE

24TH & RITNER

STREETS

240 Spring 

Garden Street

240 Spring 

Garden Street

240 Spring 

Garden Street

240 Spring 

Garden Street

AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD 

2007

2008

2007

2008

2002

2008

2007

2008

2007

2008

1999

145

145

145

145

120

145

145

145

145

145

120

45.8

41.9

44.5

40.7

50.5

43.8

35.5

43.9

27.8

42.0

38.5

Y

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

35.2

32.8

38.4

33.4

36.6

34.5

33.1

32.8

27.8

32.6

34.4

303

356

172

347

79

331

108

350

4

342

103

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

40.0

38.7

39.7

39.5

36.6

41.4

34.0

40.1

17.7

39.0

34.8

39.7

37.6

38.4

38.8

31.2

40.4

33.1

36.7

14.3

36.8

34.4

37.5

36.9

38.4

35.6

30.6

38.0

28.3

34.6

10.0

36.2

32.2

14.37*

13.50 

14.86*

13.21 

13.14 

13.49 

12.04*

13.29 

17.45*

12.93 

14.54*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 37 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0851

0851

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Charleroi

Charleroi

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Washington

Washington

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD 

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD 

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD 

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD 

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD 

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD 

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD 

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD 

AVENUE

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

1999

2000

000

000

120

120

120

000

145

145

118

118

49.2

52.9

57.3

56.1

45.0

35.2

44.6

38.5

35.5

36.5

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

39.0

46.0

37.0

35.6

29.5

31.2

37.7

31.7

33.2

36.0

282

334

329

296

347

237

249

294

73

111

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

48.9

52.1

57.2

49.0

36.1

34.3

41.7

37.5

33.2

36.0

44.6

50.4

46.3

44.9

33.6

31.9

38.5

33.8

33.1

36.0

41.7

49.2

44.0

37.4

33.2

31.6

38.2

33.5

28.7

35.4

14.81*

16.69 

13.97 

14.03*

12.73 

14.23*

13.14*

13.33*

15.44*

15.27*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 38 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

45.0

89.2

54.1

54.7

51.6

35.5

48.2

45.1

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

44.4

45.4

35.6

35.4

36.4

31.6

40.9

27.2

115

118

118

116

117

119

114

114

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

44.5

48.2

40.7

38.1

37.6

33.2

45.0

29.0

44.4

45.4

35.6

35.4

36.4

31.6

40.9

27.2

41.8

43.3

33.0

33.0

35.0

30.9

40.1

24.5

15.90 

15.88 

14.89 

13.99 

16.36 

14.42 

15.51 

13.03 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 39 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

CHARLER01 

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

31.2

14.1

18.4

11.0

14.6

52.8

36.2

41.0

45.8

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

31.2

14.1

18.4

11.0

14.6

52.8

32.7

40.5

29.7

3

3

1

1

3

49

55

56

54

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

13.2

7.4

8.9

30.0

32.7

40.5

29.7

12.0

7.2

7.6

29.3

30.5

34.3

28.8

28.7

29.7

33.7

24.3

21.90*

9.03*

18.40*

11.00*

11.43*

16.70*

14.39 

16.54 

13.47 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 40 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

WASTE 

TREATMENT 

PLANT

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS 

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS 

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS 

CREEK ROAD

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

49.2

38.2

47.7

52.0

54.1

47.1

46.5

37.1

43.9

29.3

42.5

37.0

51.2

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

42.4

33.3

38.9

37.2

33.4

34.0

33.1

33.0

37.9

25.6

38.1

30.5

37.6

77

111

116

118

116

119

120

107

118

110

261

340

316

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

42.4

34.1

39.9

48.2

42.7

37.3

36.5

34.2

39.7

28.4

42.2

32.6

49.3

39.2

33.3

38.9

37.2

33.4

34.0

33.1

33.0

37.9

25.6

41.9

32.5

46.0

29.2

32.0

36.6

36.7

33.0

29.5

30.2

31.5

36.1

25.6

40.0

32.3

45.6

14.58*

15.16 

15.85 

14.49 

14.74 

14.14 

15.88 

13.08*

14.83 

12.27 

12.98*

13.20 

14.43*

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 41 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS 

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS 

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS 

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS 

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS 

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS 

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS 

CREEK ROAD

DONOHOE ROAD 

- PENN DOT 

MAINT DIST 

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD 

- PENN DOT 

MAINT DIST 

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD 

- PENN DOT 

MAINT DIST 

BLDG

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

118

118

44.7

54.4

45.1

57.2

47.9

64.1

39.2

60.5

39.0

47.1

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

36.7

33.9

36.0

39.2

39.3

41.2

26.4

37.5

37.2

44.1

265

328

347

346

277

343

320

69

100

116

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

44.1

53.0

44.5

49.4

41.0

60.2

32.0

37.5

37.2

45.3

40.7

40.1

40.8

46.4

39.6

44.6

30.6

31.0

36.2

44.1

39.1

35.4

39.4

43.3

39.5

42.2

29.7

30.7

33.7

43.9

13.21*

13.40 

13.21 

14.23 

11.94*

13.79 

11.30*

14.90*

15.78*

16.11 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 42 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

York

York

York

York

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

York

York

York

York

DONOHOE ROAD 

- PENN DOT 

MAINT DIST 

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD 

- PENN DOT 

MAINT DIST 

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD 

- PENN DOT 

MAINT DIST 

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD 

- PENN DOT 

MAINT DIST 

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD 

- PENN DOT 

MAINT DIST 

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD 

- PENN DOT 

MAINT DIST 

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD 

- PENN DOT 

MAINT DIST 

BLDG

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

118

118

118

56.3

54.7

59.3

53.2

38.8

45.1

35.4

51.6

50.9

52.7

71.9

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

40.0

34.8

39.0

38.7

33.5

38.2

29.2

34.9

41.1

41.3

47.3

113

114

118

115

120

115

114

96

117

109

116

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

47.1

39.1

49.6

44.3

36.5

43.2

32.7

34.9

42.7

41.7

52.8

40.0

34.8

39.0

38.7

33.5

38.2

29.2

34.3

41.1

41.3

47.3

37.8

33.5

33.3

38.7

32.9

37.1

25.4

33.1

37.8

38.9

45.6

14.96 

15.32 

14.92 

16.81 

14.32 

15.26 

12.67 

15.40*

16.55 

16.62 

17.09 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 43 of 45

PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID

P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS

4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001

2002

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

71.5

56.7

58.4

37.9

45.4

37.0

28.3

40.0

12.6

16.5

55.8

35.1

34.3

33.3

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

24-HOUR 

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

47.0

35.9

39.4

33.2

37.0

32.3

28.3

40.0

12.6

16.5

43.3

33.2

28.8

32.1

111

111

112

112

119

113

2

6

1

3

52

53

58

56

1ST

MAX

2ND

MAX

3RD

MAX

48.0

37.5

45.5

35.3

37.9

33.1

17.6

22.4

15.1

43.3

33.2

28.8

32.1

47.0

35.9

39.4

33.2

37.0

32.3

22.2

4.1

30.4

31.5

27.9

25.7

46.2

34.1

38.4

33.0

36.5

30.2

11.6

29.7

28.6

27.6

23.4

17.36 

16.54 

18.12 

14.04 

15.68 

13.64 

22.95*

18.18*

12.60*

9.95*

17.82*

14.48 

14.96 

13.06 

WTD

ARITH

MEAN
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 44 of 45

88101

88101

88101

88101

000

118

120

145

MULTIPLE METHODS

R & P Model 2025 PM2.5 Sequential w/WINS

Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS

R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler

MULTIPLE METHODS

GRAVIMETRIC

GRAVIMETRIC

Gravimetric

PARAMETER

METHOD

CODE COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD

METHODS USED IN THIS REPORT
Oct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)

Page 45 of 45

PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT

PQAO AGENCY DESCRIPTION

0021

0851

0861

Allegheny County,PA Health Department

Pennsylvania Department Of Environmental Protection

Philadelphia Air Management Services
APPENDIX A-2 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Air Quality System: PM2.5 Quarterly Data (1999 – 2008) 

(provided in electronic form only) 

Bureau of Air Quality 

Department of Environmental Protection 
This page blank for copying purposes. 
1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

001 0001 NARSTO SITE - 

ARENDTSVILLE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

003 0008 BAPC 301 39TH 

STREET BLDG #7

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0021 GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0064 2743 

Washington Blvd

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0067 OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH FAYETTE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 2 0 

3 0 4 0 

0093 PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH PARK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1 of 78
1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

0095 1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD CORAOPOLIS PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 4 0 

0097 BEAVER ROAD 

LEETSDALE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

3 0 

4 0 

0116 405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES ROCKS, PA 15132

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

4 0 

0131 WAVE 

POOL,SOUTH PARK, SOUTH PARK TWP, PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

4 0 

1008 PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, NATRONA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1301 600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. BRADDOCK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 

4 0 

2 of 78
1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

9002 SPRINGDALE 

JR HIGH, COLFAX & BUTLER

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 

4 0 

011 0009 UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD AND PROSPECT ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 4 0 

017 0012 ROCKVIEW 

LANE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

021 0011 MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

043 0401 1833 UPS 

DRIVE HARRISBURG PA

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 4 0 

3 of 78
1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

045 0002 FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

049 0003 10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

4 0 

069 2006 GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND CITY OF SCRANTON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

071 0007 ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR HIGH GROFFTOWN RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

077 0004 STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR 1600 HANOVER AVE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

4 of 78
1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

079 1101 CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

091 0013 STATE 

ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

095 0025 WASHINGTON 

& CAMBRIA STS. FREEMANSBURG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

101 0004 1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0020 FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT PLANT

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0024 GRANTASHTON 

ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

5 of 78
1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

3 0 4 0 

0047 500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0136 AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD AVENUE

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

125 0005 CHARLER01 

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0200 MCCARRELL 

AND FAYETTE STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

5001 HILLMAN 

STATE PARK - KINGS CREEK ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

6 of 78
1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

129 0008 DONOHOE 

ROAD - PENN DOT MAINT DIST BLDG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

7 of 78
2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

001 0001 NARSTO SITE - 

ARENDTSVILLE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

003 0008 BAPC 301 39TH 

STREET BLDG #7

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0021 GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0064 2743 

Washington Blvd

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0067 OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH FAYETTE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0093 PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH PARK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

8 of 78
2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

4 0 

0095 1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD CORAOPOLIS PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

4 0 

0097 BEAVER ROAD 

LEETSDALE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

4 0 

0116 405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES ROCKS, PA 15132

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0131 WAVE 

POOL,SOUTH PARK, SOUTH PARK TWP, PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1008 PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, NATRONA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1301 600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. BRADDOCK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

9 of 78
2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

4 0 

9002 SPRINGDALE 

JR HIGH, COLFAX & BUTLER

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

007 0014 EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER ALLEY

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

3 0 

011 0009 UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD AND PROSPECT ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

017 0012 ROCKVIEW 

LANE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

021 0011 MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

10 of 78
2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

027 0100 PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - ARBORETUM SITE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

4 0 

041 0100 210 NORTH 

MIDDLESEX ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

043 0401 1833 UPS 

DRIVE HARRISBURG PA

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

045 0002 FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 

4 0 

049 0003 10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

11 of 78
2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

3 0 4 0 

069 2006 GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND CITY OF SCRANTON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 2 0 

3 0 

071 0007 ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR HIGH GROFFTOWN RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 

4 0 

077 0004 STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR 1600 HANOVER AVE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

079 1101 CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

12 of 78
2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

085 0100 PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) & PA418

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 2 0 

3 0 4 0 

091 0013 STATE 

ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

095 0025 WASHINGTON 

& CAMBRIA STS. FREEMANSBURG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

099 0301 ROUTE 34 

LITTLE BUFFALO STATE PARK

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

101 0004 1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0020 FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT PLANT

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

13 of 78
2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

3 0 4 0 

0024 GRANTASHTON 

ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0027 S W CORNER 

BROAD AND BUTLER

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 2 0 

3 0 4 0 

0047 500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 4 0 

0136 AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD AVENUE

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

125 0005 CHARLER01 

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

3 0 

14 of 78
2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

0200 MCCARRELL 

AND FAYETTE STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

5001 HILLMAN 

STATE PARK - KINGS CREEK ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

129 0008 DONOHOE 

ROAD - PENN DOT MAINT DIST BLDG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 

15 of 78
2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

001 0001 NARSTO SITE - 

ARENDTSVILLE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

003 0008 BAPC 301 39TH 

STREET BLDG #7

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0021 GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0064 2743 

Washington Blvd

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0067 OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH FAYETTE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0093 PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH PARK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

16 of 78
2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

4 0 

0095 1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD CORAOPOLIS PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0116 405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES ROCKS, PA 15132

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0131 WAVE 

POOL,SOUTH PARK, SOUTH PARK TWP, PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1008 PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, NATRONA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1301 600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. BRADDOCK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

3007 501 Waddell Ave 0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

17 of 78
2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

4 0 

9002 SPRINGDALE 

JR HIGH, COLFAX & BUTLER

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

007 0014 EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER ALLEY

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 4 0 

011 0009 UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD AND PROSPECT ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

017 0012 ROCKVIEW 

LANE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

18 of 78
2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

021 0011 MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

027 0100 PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - ARBORETUM SITE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

041 0100 210 NORTH 

MIDDLESEX ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

0101 IMPERIAL 

COURT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

043 0401 1833 UPS 

DRIVE HARRISBURG PA

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

19 of 78
2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

2 0 3 0 4 0 

045 0002 FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 3 0 

4 0 

049 0003 10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

069 2006 GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND CITY OF SCRANTON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 2 0 

3 0 

4 0 

20 of 78
2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

071 0007 ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR HIGH GROFFTOWN RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

3 0 

4 0 

077 0004 STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR 1600 HANOVER AVE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

079 1101 CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

085 0100 PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) & PA418

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

21 of 78
2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

091 0013 STATE 

ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

095 0025 WASHINGTON 

& CAMBRIA STS. FREEMANSBURG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

099 0301 ROUTE 34 

LITTLE BUFFALO STATE PARK

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

101 0004 1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0020 FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT PLANT

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

22 of 78
2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

4 0 

0024 GRANTASHTON 

ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0047 500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0136 AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD AVENUE

0861 Philadelphia 

Air Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

125 0005 CHARLER01 

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

4 0 

0200 MCCARRELL 

AND FAYETTE STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

23 of 78
2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

3 0 4 0 

5001 HILLMAN 

STATE PARK - KINGS CREEK ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

129 0008 DONOHOE 

ROAD - PENN DOT MAINT DIST BLDG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 2 0 

3 0 

24 of 78
2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

001 0001 NARSTO SITE - 

ARENDTSVILLE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

003 0008 BAPC 301 39TH 

STREET BLDG #7

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0021 GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0064 2743 

Washington Blvd

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0067 OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH FAYETTE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0093 PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH PARK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

25 of 78
2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

0095 1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD CORAOPOLIS PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0116 405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES ROCKS, PA 15132

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0131 WAVE 

POOL,SOUTH PARK, SOUTH PARK TWP, PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1008 PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, NATRONA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1301 600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. BRADDOCK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

3007 501 Waddell Ave 0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

26 of 78
2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

9002 SPRINGDALE 

JR HIGH, COLFAX & BUTLER

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

007 0014 EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER ALLEY

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

011 0009 UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD AND PROSPECT ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

017 0012 ROCKVIEW 

LANE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

021 0011 MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

027 0100 PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - ARBORETUM SITE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

27 of 78
2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

4 0 

029 0100 NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - TOUGHKENAMON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

041 0101 IMPERIAL 

COURT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

043 0401 1833 UPS 

DRIVE HARRISBURG PA

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

045 0002 FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

2 7 2 0 

3 0 

049 0003 10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

069 2006 GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND CITY OF SCRANTON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

28 of 78
2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

2 0 3 5 4 0 

071 0007 ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR HIGH GROFFTOWN RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 2 0 

077 0004 STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR 1600 HANOVER AVE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

079 1101 CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

085 0100 PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) & PA418

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

091 0013 STATE 

ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

29 of 78
2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

095 0025 WASHINGTON 

& CAMBRIA STS. FREEMANSBURG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

099 0301 ROUTE 34 

LITTLE BUFFALO STATE PARK

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

101 0004 1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

0014 ROXY WATER 

PUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 4 0 

0020 FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT PLANT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

0024 GRANTASHTON 

ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

30 of 78
2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

0047 500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

0052 1439 EAST 

PASSYUNK AVENUE

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

0136 AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD AVENUE

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

125 0005 CHARLER01 

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 2 0 

0200 MCCARRELL 

AND FAYETTE STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

5001 HILLMAN 

STATE PARK - KINGS CREEK ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

31 of 78
2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

3 0 4 0 

129 0008 DONOHOE 

ROAD - PENN DOT MAINT DIST BLDG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 2 0 

32 of 78
2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

001 0001 NARSTO SITE - 

ARENDTSVILLE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

003 0008 BAPC 301 39TH 

STREET BLDG #7

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

0021 GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

0064 2743 

Washington Blvd

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 2

0067 OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH FAYETTE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 

0093 PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH PARK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

33 of 78
2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

0095 1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD CORAOPOLIS PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

0116 405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES ROCKS, PA 15132

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

0131 WAVE 

POOL,SOUTH PARK, SOUTH PARK TWP, PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

0133 5118 DORRIS 

DRIVE, ELIZABETH

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 

1008 PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, NATRONA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

1301 600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. BRADDOCK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

3007 501 Waddell Ave 0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

34 of 78
2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

9002 SPRINGDALE 

JR HIGH, COLFAX & BUTLER

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

007 0014 EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER ALLEY

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

2 7 2 0 2

3 0 

011 0009 UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD AND PROSPECT ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

017 0012 ROCKVIEW 

LANE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

021 0011 MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 1

35 of 78
2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

3 0 24 0 1

027 0100 PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - ARBORETUM SITE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

029 0100 NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - TOUGHKENAMON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

041 0101 IMPERIAL 

COURT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

043 0401 1833 UPS 

DRIVE HARRISBURG PA

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

045 0002 FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

36 of 78
2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

2 7 1 0 3

2 0 33 0 14 0 1

049 0003 10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 

069 2006 GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND CITY OF SCRANTON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

2 7 2 0 

3 0 4 0 

071 0007 ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR HIGH GROFFTOWN RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 2

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

2 7 2 0 2

3 0 

077 0004 STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR 1600 HANOVER AVE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

37 of 78
2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

079 1101 CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

085 0100 PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) & PA418

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

091 0013 STATE 

ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

095 0025 WASHINGTON 

& CAMBRIA STS. FREEMANSBURG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

099 0301 ROUTE 34 

LITTLE BUFFALO STATE PARK

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 

38 of 78
2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

101 0004 1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

0014 ROXY WATER 

PUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

0020 FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT PLANT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

0024 GRANTASHTON 

ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

0047 500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

0136 AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD AVENUE

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 1

39 of 78
2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

4 0 1

125 0005 CHARLER01 

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

2 7 2 0 1

0200 MCCARRELL 

AND FAYETTE STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

5001 HILLMAN 

STATE PARK - KINGS CREEK ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

129 0008 DONOHOE 

ROAD - PENN DOT MAINT DIST BLDG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

40 of 78
2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

001 0001 NARSTO SITE - 

ARENDTSVILLE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

003 0008 BAPC 301 39TH 

STREET BLDG #7

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0021 GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0064 2743 

Washington Blvd

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0067 OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH FAYETTE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0093 PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH PARK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

41 of 78
2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

0095 1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD CORAOPOLIS PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0116 405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES ROCKS, PA 15132

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0133 5118 DORRIS 

DRIVE, ELIZABETH

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1008 PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, NATRONA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1301 600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. BRADDOCK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

3007 501 Waddell Ave 0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

42 of 78
2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

9002 SPRINGDALE 

JR HIGH, COLFAX & BUTLER

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

007 0014 EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER ALLEY

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 2 0 

011 0009 UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD AND PROSPECT ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

017 0012 ROCKVIEW 

LANE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

021 0011 MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

027 0100 PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - ARBORETUM SITE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

43 of 78
2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

4 0 

029 0100 NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - TOUGHKENAMON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

041 0101 IMPERIAL 

COURT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

043 0401 1833 UPS 

DRIVE HARRISBURG PA

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

045 0002 FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 2 0 

4 0 

049 0003 10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

069 2006 GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND CITY OF SCRANTON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

44 of 78
2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

2 0 3 0 4 0 

071 0007 ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR HIGH GROFFTOWN RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

077 0004 STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR 1600 HANOVER AVE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

079 1101 CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

085 0100 PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) & PA418

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

091 0013 STATE 

ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

45 of 78
2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

095 0025 WASHINGTON 

& CAMBRIA STS. FREEMANSBURG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

099 0301 ROUTE 34 

LITTLE BUFFALO STATE PARK

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

101 0004 1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0014 ROXY WATER 

PUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

0020 FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT PLANT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0024 GRANTASHTON 

ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

46 of 78
2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

0047 500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0136 AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD AVENUE

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

125 0005 CHARLER01 

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

4 0 

0200 MCCARRELL 

AND FAYETTE STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

5001 HILLMAN 

STATE PARK - KINGS CREEK ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

129 0008 DONOHOE 

ROAD - PENN DOT MAINT DIST BLDG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

47 of 78
2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

2 0 3 0 4 0 

133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 2 0 

3 0 

48 of 78
2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

001 0001 NARSTO SITE - 

ARENDTSVILLE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

003 0008 BAPC 301 39TH 

STREET BLDG #7

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

2 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

0021 GLADSTONE 

HIGH SCHOOL

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

0064 2743 

Washington Blvd

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 23 0 24 0 2

2 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 34 0 2

0067 OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH FAYETTE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 1

49 of 78
2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

3 0 24 0 1

0093 PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH PARK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 9

0095 1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD CORAOPOLIS PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 9

0116 405 WHEELER 

AVE, MCKEES ROCKS, PA 15132

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

0133 5118 DORRIS 

DRIVE, ELIZABETH

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 9

1008 PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, NATRONA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

1301 600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. BRADDOCK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 1

50 of 78
2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

3 0 24 0 1

2 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

3007 501 Waddell Ave 0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

9002 SPRINGDALE 

JR HIGH, COLFAX & BUTLER

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

007 0014 EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER ALLEY

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

2 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

011 0009 UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD AND PROSPECT ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

017 0012 ROCKVIEW 

LANE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

51 of 78
2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

021 0011 MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

027 0100 PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - ARBORETUM SITE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

029 0100 NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - TOUGHKENAMON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

041 0101 IMPERIAL 

COURT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

043 0401 1833 UPS 

DRIVE HARRISBURG PA

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

045 0002 FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

52 of 78
2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

2 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

049 0003 10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

069 2006 GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND CITY OF SCRANTON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

071 0007 ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR HIGH GROFFTOWN RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 2

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

077 0004 STATE 

HOSPITAL REAR 1600 HANOVER AVE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

53 of 78
2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

079 1101 CHILWICK & 

WASHINGTON STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

085 0100 PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) & PA418

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

091 0013 STATE 

ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 93 0 14 0 1

095 0025 WASHINGTON 

& CAMBRIA STS. FREEMANSBURG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

099 0301 ROUTE 34 

LITTLE BUFFALO STATE PARK

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

101 0003 COMM HEALTH 

SERVICES 500 S BROAD STREET

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 4 0 1

54 of 78
2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

0004 1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

0020 FORD RDBELMONT AVE 

WATER TREAT PLANT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

0024 GRANTASHTON 

ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

0047 500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

0136 AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD AVENUE

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

125 0005 CHARLER01 

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

2 7 1 0 1

2 0 1

55 of 78
2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

3 0 24 0 1

0200 MCCARRELL 

AND FAYETTE STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

5001 HILLMAN 

STATE PARK - KINGS CREEK ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 14 0 1

129 0008 DONOHOE 

ROAD - PENN DOT MAINT DIST BLDG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 1

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

2 7 1 0 2

2 0 13 0 24 0 1

56 of 78
2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

001 0001 NARSTO SITE - 

ARENDTSVILLE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

003 0008 BAPC 301 39TH 

STREET BLDG #7

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 24 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0064 2743 

Washington Blvd

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 24 0 2

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 24 0 

0067 OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH FAYETTE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0093 PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH PARK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

57 of 78
2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

4 0 

0095 1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD CORAOPOLIS PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1008 PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, NATRONA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1301 600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. BRADDOCK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 24 0 

3007 501 Waddell Ave 0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

007 0014 EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER ALLEY

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 

58 of 78
2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

3 0 4 0 

011 0009 UGI CO 

MONGANTOWN RD AND PROSPECT ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

0010 503 NORTH 6TH 

STREET

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 2 0 

3 0 4 0 

017 0012 ROCKVIEW 

LANE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

021 0011 MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

027 0100 PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - ARBORETUM SITE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

029 0100 NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - TOUGHKENAMON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

59 of 78
2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

041 0101 IMPERIAL 

COURT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

043 0401 1833 UPS 

DRIVE HARRISBURG PA

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

045 0002 FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

049 0003 10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

069 2006 GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND CITY OF SCRANTON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

60 of 78
2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

071 0007 ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR HIGH GROFFTOWN RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

085 0100 PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) & PA418

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

091 0013 STATE 

ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

095 0025 WASHINGTON 

& CAMBRIA STS. FREEMANSBURG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

101 0003 COMM HEALTH 

SERVICES 500 S BROAD STREET

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

0004 1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 

61 of 78
2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0024 GRANTASHTON 

ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0047 500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0136 AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD AVENUE

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

125 0005 CHARLER01 

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

62 of 78
2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

0200 MCCARRELL 

AND FAYETTE STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

5001 HILLMAN 

STATE PARK - KINGS CREEK ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

129 0008 DONOHOE 

ROAD - PENN DOT MAINT DIST BLDG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 24 0 

133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

63 of 78
2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

001 0001 NARSTO SITE - 

ARENDTSVILLE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

003 0008 BAPC 301 39TH 

STREET BLDG #7

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0064 2743 

Washington Blvd

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0067 OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH FAYETTE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0093 PEARCE MILL 

ROAD NORTH PARK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

64 of 78
2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

3 0 4 0 

0095 1000 BEAVER 

GRADE RD CORAOPOLIS PA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1008 PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, NATRONA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1301 600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. BRADDOCK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

3007 501 Waddell Ave 0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

007 0014 EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER ALLEY

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

65 of 78
2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

011 0010 503 NORTH 6TH 

STREET

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

0011 1059 Arnold 

Road

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 3 0 

4 0 

017 0012 ROCKVIEW 

LANE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

021 0011 MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

027 0100 PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - ARBORETUM SITE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

66 of 78
2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

029 0100 NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - TOUGHKENAMON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 4 0 

041 0101 IMPERIAL 

COURT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

043 0401 1833 UPS 

DRIVE HARRISBURG PA

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

045 0002 FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

67 of 78
2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

049 0003 10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

069 2006 GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND CITY OF SCRANTON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

071 0007 ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR HIGH GROFFTOWN RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

085 0100 PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) & PA418

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

68 of 78
2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

091 0013 STATE 

ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

095 0025 WASHINGTON 

& CAMBRIA STS. FREEMANSBURG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

101 0004 1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 4 0 

0024 GRANTASHTON 

ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0047 500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

69 of 78
2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

2 0 3 0 4 0 

4 7 3 0 

4 0 

0057 240 Spring 

Garden Street

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 3 0 

4 0 

4 7 4 0 

0136 AMTRAK, 5917 

ELMWOOD AVENUE

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

125 0005 CHARLER01 

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0200 MCCARRELL 

AND FAYETTE STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

70 of 78
2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

5001 HILLMAN 

STATE PARK - KINGS CREEK ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

129 0008 DONOHOE 

ROAD - PENN DOT MAINT DIST BLDG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

71 of 78
2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

001 0001 NARSTO SITE - 

ARENDTSVILLE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

003 0008 BAPC 301 39TH 

STREET BLDG #7

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 5 4 0 

0064 2743 

Washington Blvd

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0067 OLD OAKDALE 

ROAD, SOUTH FAYETTE

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

1008 PACIFIC & 

IDAHO AVE, NATRONA

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 

72 of 78
2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

4 0 

1301 600 ANDERSON 

ST, N. BRADDOCK

0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

3007 501 Waddell Ave 0021 Allegheny 

County,PA Health Department

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

007 0014 EIGHT STREET 

AND RIVER ALLEY

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

011 0011 1059 Arnold 

Road

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

73 of 78
2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

017 0012 ROCKVIEW 

LANE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

3 0 4 0 

021 0011 MILLER AUTO 

SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

027 0100 PENN STATE 

UNIVERSITY - ARBORETUM SITE

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

029 0100 NEW GARDEN 

AIRPORT - TOUGHKENAMON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

041 0101 IMPERIAL 

COURT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

043 0401 1833 UPS 

DRIVE HARRISBURG PA

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 

74 of 78
2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

3 0 4 0 

045 0002 FRONT ST & 

NORRIS ST

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

049 0003 10TH AND 

MARNE STREETS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

069 2006 GEORGE ST 

TROOP AND CITY OF SCRANTON

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

071 0007 ABRAHAM 

LINCOLN JR HIGH GROFFTOWN RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

085 0100 PA518 (NEW 

CASTLE ROAD) & PA418

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

75 of 78
2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

091 0013 STATE 

ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

095 0025 WASHINGTON 

& CAMBRIA STS. FREEMANSBURG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

101 0004 1501 E 

LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0024 GRANTASHTON 

ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0047 500 SOUTH 

BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

4 7 1 0 

76 of 78
2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0055 24TH & RITNER 

STREETS

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0057 240 Spring 

Garden Street

0861 Philadelphia Air 

Management Services

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

4 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

125 0005 CHARLER01 

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

0200 MCCARRELL 

AND FAYETTE STS

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

77 of 78
2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring Data

Extracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer System

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/

Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42

County Code Site ID Street Address Support Agency 

Code

Agency Desc POC Dur Code Summ 

Qrtr

Excptnl 

Data Type 

ID

A

Me

5001 HILLMAN 

STATE PARK - KINGS CREEK ROAD

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

129 0008 DONOHOE 

ROAD - PENN DOT MAINT DIST BLDG

0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 Pennsylvania 

Department Of Environmental Protection

1 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

2 7 1 0 

2 0 3 0 4 0 

78 of 78
A. Introduction 

This document describes the methodology used by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to develop 

inventories of air pollutants emitted as required by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s 

Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule (CERR) (40 CFR Part 51, Subpart A). The 2002 inventory will 

also be the base year inventory for State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision development for PM2.5, 8-

hour ozone and regional haze. 

The CERR requires the Commonwealth to report actual emissions for the following pollutants: sulfur 

oxides, volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, lead and lead compounds, 

primary PM2.5, primary PM10, and ammonia (40 CFR 51.15(a)). The CERR lists primary PM as an 

optional pollutant for reporting purposes. The CERR does not require the submission of hazardous air 

pollutant emissions data. 

Emissions from point sources are reported for 65 of the Commonwealth’s 67 counties. Point source 

emissions from sources located in Allegheny County are reported directly to EPA by the Allegheny 

County Health Department. Point source emissions from sources located in Philadelphia Counties are 

reported directly by the Philadelphia County Health Department, Air Management Services. 

The annual emission inventory must be temporally resolved to provide seasonal data for air quality 

modeling purposes. Temporal adjustments to the annual inventory are made because of seasonal 

differences in the rate of emissions or activity, or to apportion emissions to a particular season or day. 

For the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) emissions inventory, VOC, NOx, 

and CO emissions are reported as actual annual and actual summer weekday. Summer weekday 

emissions are defined as an average day’s emissions for a typical summer day during the ozone season. 

For the PM2.5 NAAQS and regional haze rule emission inventories, direct emissions (including 

condensibles) of PM10 and PM2.5, and the precursor VOC, NOx, SOx, and NH3 are reported as actual 

annual data. 

For the ozone SIP inventories, rule effectiveness and rule penetration are applied. Rule effectiveness 

reflects the ability of a regulatory program to achieve all the emission reductions that could have been 

achieved by full compliance with the applicable regulations at all sources at all times. Rule penetration is 

an estimate of the extent to which a regulation covers emissions from an area source category for a 

specified control area. Rule penetration is applied to the control efficiency for a regulation to account for 

less than 100 percent coverage of the emissions for an area source category. Because the inventory was 

developed prior to EPA’s issuance of the November, 2005 revision to the rule effectiveness guidance, 

Commonwealth followed the previous EPA guidance and assumed an 80% rule effectiveness for 

applicable sources unless specified to the contrary. 

B. Point Sources 

A point source is a stationary, identifiable source of air pollution that usually emits the air pollutants 

through a stack or vent. A facility contains one or more point sources and is not limited to industrial 

facilities. Examples of an air pollution facility are steel mills, oil refineries, electric generating facilities, 

and coal preparation plants. A non-industrial facility may contain a large boiler or other air pollution 

source. 

 1
The data for the 2002 and 2004 sulfur oxides, volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides, carbon 

monoxide, lead and lead compounds, primary PM2.5, primary PM10, and ammonia point source emission 

inventory is derived from the Pennsylvania Air Information Management System (AIMS). AIMS 

sources are identified and inventoried by Pennsylvania regional air quality offices through permitting 

operations and regional and central office field inspections and surveys. The AIMS system is designed to 

include all point source emission categories as required by the CERR. 

The AIMS database is linked to the Department’s eFACTS (Environment Facility, Application, 

Compliance Tracking System) database. This allows Department-wide sharing of data for all program 

areas. In addition, the public is provided better access to the information through the Department’s 

Internet website. 

The point source inventories for Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties will be prepared by the Allegheny 

County Health Department and the Philadelphia County Health Department, respectively. The two 

county agencies will submit their point source emission inventories directly to EPA’s National Emission 

Inventory as required by the CERR. The county agencies will also provide their point source data to the 

Department in order that effective State Implementation Plan preparation may be undertaken. 

Paper Submittal of Inventory Data 

Annually, facilities complete worksheets for each source that operated and emitted pollutants for the year. 

Data required for processes include monthly material throughputs, days and weeks the sources operated, 

material processed, maximum throughput per hour, and correct Source Classification Code (SCC) 

number. In addition to these process data, combustion unit data must include fuel used, fuel 

characteristics such as sulfur content and Btu. For each source, an estimate of total criteria and hazardous 

pollutant emissions must be supplied, along with the estimation method. If emissions are estimated using 

anything other than emissions factors from SCC codes, methodology must be provided. In addition to 

emissions estimates for each piece of equipment, site emissions are required. If there is equipment that is 

too small for individual reporting, emissions from this equipment will be reflected in the site total. 

After the facilities provide these data, DEP reviewers input the data into the AIMS system. At this time, 

the system may create an error message if emissions are significantly different from those expected, based 

upon emissions factors and throughputs. At this point, the reviewer must determine if the estimate is 

accurate and may either override the error message or contact the facility for corrections, which are then 

input by the reviewer. 

After all data are entered, reports are generated to show comparisons between emissions years. If 

there are significant differences, reviewers must determine why emissions are different. 

Explanations may include changes in production or change in material input. Once all 

discrepancies have been corrected or explained, the data are accepted, and the inventory is 

considered complete.

Instructions Available 

DEP has developed instructions for companies to complete the annual inventory submission, which 

describes the database fields in the AIMS/eFACTS system. This document is revised annually to reflect 

any new guidance for the applicable reporting year. 

Information on the emission inventory reporting system can be found at: 

www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/airwaste/aq/emission/Emission_Inventory.htm. Instructions for the 

system are attached. 

 2
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE ANNUAL EMISSIONS 

REPORTING FORMS 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 

Department of Environmental Protection 

Edward G. Rendell, Governor Kathleen McGinty, Secretary 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

2700-BK-DEP1936 Rev. 12/2005 
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Table of Contents 

1. Background........................................................................................................................................................1

1.1 Annual Emission Statement (AES) Background:...................................................................................1

1.2 Electronic Reporting:................................................................................................................................2

1.2.1 Web-based Reporting Forms...............................................................................................................2

1.2.2 eXtensible Markup Language (XML) .................................................................................................2

2. Helpful Resources..............................................................................................................................................3

2.1 Check-Lists For Common Errors ............................................................................................................3

2.1.1 Facility Information .............................................................................................................................3

2.1.2 Sub Facility Information......................................................................................................................3

2.1.3 Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)........................................................................................................3

2.2 AP-42 and FIRE ........................................................................................................................................4

2.3 Industry-Specific Emission Factors .........................................................................................................5

2.4 Standard Industrial Classification and North American Industry Classification System..................5

2.5 Small Business Assistance..................................................................................................................5

3. Instructions For Determining Which Facilities Belong In AIMS/eFACTS For Inventory Purposes........6

3.1 Title V Facilities.........................................................................................................................................6

3.2 Non-Title V Facilities.................................................................................................................................7

3.2.1 Facilities Inventoried for Emission Statement Purposes......................................................................7

3.2.2 Facilities Inventoried for Permit Cap Compliance Certification .........................................................8

3.2.3 Facilities Inventoried for State Implementation Planning Purposes....................................................9

4. Commonly Asked Questions About Inventory Reporting ...........................................................................10

5. Elaboration On Worksheet Contents, For All Firm-Plants.........................................................................12

5.1 Throughputs For Each Source ...............................................................................................................12

5.2 Operating Schedules For Each Source ..................................................................................................12

5.3 Emission Estimates..................................................................................................................................13

5.4 Fuel Analysis............................................................................................................................................13

5.5 Surface Coating (Paint, Glue, Ink) Analysis.........................................................................................13

5.6 Control Devices........................................................................................................................................13

5.7 Stacks........................................................................................................................................................13

5.8 Hazardous Air Pollutants .......................................................................................................................14

5.9 Site Pollutant Summary ..........................................................................................................................14

6. Confidentiality .................................................................................................................................................15

7. Certification of Data Accuracy for Emission Statement..............................................................................15

8. Extensions Beyond March 1 ...........................................................................................................................15

9. DEP Contact Listings......................................................................................................................................16

9.1 Contact Listing, Norristown - Region I (Southeast).............................................................................16

9.2 Contact Listing, Wilkes-Barre - Region II (Northeast)........................................................................17

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - i - October 2005 
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

9.3 Contact Listing, Harrisburg - Region III (Southcentral).....................................................................18

9.4 Contact Listing, Williamsport - Region IV (Northcentral)..................................................................19

9.5 Contact Listing, Pittsburgh - Region V (Southwest)............................................................................19

9.6 Contact Listing, Meadville - Region VI (Northwest)............................................................................20

9.7 Contact Listing, Philadelphia Air Management Services....................................................................22

9.8 Contact Listing, Allegheny County Health Department......................................................................22

10. Calculation Method Codes For Emissions ....................................................................................................23

11. Reliability Codes For Emissions.....................................................................................................................24

12. Abbreviations/Acronyms ................................................................................................................................25

13. Table A: Hazardous Air Pollutants (112 [b]) Sorted Alphabetically by Pollutant Name ........................26

14. Table B: Hazardous Air Pollutants (112 [b]) Sorted by Chemical Abstract Service Number ................31

15. Table C: Compounds As Listed In 112(b)....................................................................................................35

Appendix A WORKSHEET FOR A NEW FACILITY................................................................................36

Appendix B WORKSHEET FOR MISCELLANEOUS SOURCE EMISSIONS.......................................38

Appendix C WORKSHEET FOR NEW COMBUSTION UNITS ...............................................................39

Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES.................................................................................43

Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS.........................................................................48

Appendix F WORKSHEET FOR NEW CONTROL DEVICES .................................................................54

Appendix G WORKSHEET FOR NEW STACKS........................................................................................55

Appendix H WORKSHEET FOR NEW FUEL MATERIAL LOCATIONS..............................................56

Appendix I WORKSHEET FOR CHANGES TO EXISTING STACKS OR CONTROL DEVICES...58

Appendix J CERTIFICATION OF DATA ACCURACY..........................................................................60

These instructions were prepared by: 

Carrie E. Eastman 

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Bureau of Air Quality, Harrisburg 

717-783-5974 

ceastman@state.pa.us

Note: This booklet contains the instructions for filling out the Annual Emission Statement. These 

instructions have been prepared to assist the owner/operators to report their emissions 

data. These instructions are not regulations. The Department reserves the right to modify 

these instructions as needed. Please save this booklet for future reference. If you have 

questions about the Annual Emission Statement, please contact your Regional Air Quality 

staff. 

This booklet is available electronically via the Internet. Access the DEP Web site at 

www.depweb.state.pa.us, Keyword: "Emission Inventory." 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality Page ii December 2005 
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

1. Background 

1.1 Annual Emission Statement (AES) Background: 

The Annual Emission Statement (AES) requests information to satisfy several regulatory requirements. 

These requirements include Title V permitting, the Annual Inventory, and Emission Statements, as well as 

other regulations that are part of the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Title V regulation is found in the 

Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 127. The Annual Inventory regulation is found in the Pennsylvania 

Code, Title 25, Chapter 135.1-135.5. The Emission Statement regulation is found in Pennsylvania Code, Title 

25, Chapter 135.21. The Emission Statement information is due March 1. The Annual Inventory information is 

due March 1 or within 60 days of the date the facility’s owner/operator is notified by the Department of 

Environmental Protection (DEP) that the facility is subject to Annual Inventory, whichever is later. DEP has 

chosen March 1 as the collective deadline to avoid having to request Emission Statement and Annual 

Inventory information separately. 

When a facility’s owner/operator provides the AES to the appropriate DEP regional office, the 

information is entered, either automatically or manually depending on the reporting method, into DEP’s 

computer database. This database is called the Air Information Management System / environment, Facility, 

Application, Compliance Tracking System (AIMS/eFACTS). The Regional Air Quality (RAQ) staff review the 

submission for incorrect or missing data before the data is accepted into AIMS/eFACTS. For a facility that has 

not been entered in AIMS/eFACTS in previous years, the RAQ staff first creates a map showing the 

connections between the sub facilities being tracked, the control devices and the stacks. Worksheets for 

owners/operators of facilities that have never previously reported, or for new sub facilities, are included in 

these Instructions, and are also available from the DEP website or from RAQ staff. For a facility that has 

previously been entered, a skeleton consisting of the map and unchanging sub facility information, such as 

rated capacities, has been copied over from the previous year. 

Once the operating schedules, throughputs, and facility emission estimates have been entered, 

AIMS/eFACTS calculates the emissions using Sub Facility Classification Code (SCC) factors. If the 

AIMS/eFACTS and facility estimates do not match, the RAQ staff may work with the facility’s owner/operator to 

determine if corrections are needed. AIMS/eFACTS can contain multiple emission estimates for a specific 

pollutant from a specific piece of equipment. Acceptable calculation methods include stack tests, Continuous 

Emission Monitoring (CEM) data, material balance calculations, and industry-specific emission factors, to list 

some examples. CEM data is usually the most reliable and should be used before any other method. 

Some uses for AIMS/eFACTS data include Emissions Reductions Credits, Open Market Trading, 

regulation evaluation, the State Implementation Plan and modeling. A variety of standard and custom reports 

can be run on AIMS/eFACTS by DEP staff. AIMS/eFACTS data is provided to the federal National Emission 

Inventory (NEI) database and to other state agencies and the public upon request (See Chapter VI. 

Confidentiality). 

Lab samples are also logged into AIMS/eFACTS and linked to the appropriate plant and sub facility. 

AIMS/eFACTS also contains permit, emission fee, compliance, stack test and Continuous Emission Monitoring 

(CEM) information. 

This booklet is available electronically via Internet. Access the DEP Web Site at 

http://www.depweb.state.pa.us, Keyword: Emission Inventory." 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 1 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

1.2 Electronic Reporting: 

Detailed electronic reporting information such as upcoming training (when scheduled) and registration 

forms are available from the DEP web site at http://www.depweb.state.pa.us, Keyword: "Emission Inventory." 

Contact Carrie Eastman at 717-783-5974 or through electronic mail at ceastman@state.pa.us to request 

electronic reporting information, including registration forms to request access to the services. 

1.2.1 Web-based Reporting Forms 

The Bureau of Air Quality’s (BAQ’s) web-based reporting application is called AES*Online. 

AES*Online allows a facility’s owner/operator to enter data on an Internet web site through an ordinary web 

browser. AES*Online users no longer need to fill out paper forms. Facility users log in to a series of secure 

screens and enter their facility’s inventory data. AES*Online automatically fills in fields where applicable from 

the previous year’s submission and also checks the data as it is entered to insure accuracy. Additionally, 

AES*Online includes the ability to add notes to the data and exchange correspondence with RAQ staff. 

AES*Online provides a unique navigation system to allow the user to move between screen forms with ease. 

After the RAQ staff review the submission, entries that need clarification are highlighted by the system so that 

the facility user can immediately verify the data without having to scroll through unnecessary screens. Data is 

automatically saved as each screen form is completed to prevent loss of data if the Internet connection is 

broken. 

AES*Online requires Internet access. If your data management system is maintained in spreadsheets 

or databases, you may want to explore the entirely automated eXtensible Markup Language (XML) option 

instead of AES*Online. 

1.2.2 eXtensible Markup Language (XML) 

XML provides a common language that allows dissimilar computer systems to share data. XML surrounds 

each piece of data with tags, similar to the way a web browser displays a page from the Internet. Software, 

called a parser, uses these tags to interpret the data. Many different software companies offer parsers, for a 

variety of prices. An XML parser is bundled into Windows 2003. XML uses a Document Type Definition (DTD) 

to establish the data content and tags for a specific file or document. BAQ has developed a DTD that defines 

the AES data and tags. A company that wishes to submit XML data to BAQ must request a copy of the DTD 

and configure their parser to translate the BAQ DTD. Files in XML format may be transferred on disk or over 

the Internet. The XML standards and sample files are available for download at 

http://www.depweb.state.pa.us, Keyword: "Emission Inventory." 

Useful links for more information on XML: 

http://www.w3.org

http://msdn.Microsoft.com/xml/

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 2 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

2. Helpful Resources 

2.1 Check-Lists For Common Errors 

Some errors have a way of being repetitious. While the BAQ accepts responsibility for unclear 

instructions and other systemic errors, please complete this checklist before submitting your AES. 

Comments and questions about the contents of the AES can be directed to Mike Rudawski at 717-783-

9241 or mrudawski@state.pa.us. 

2.1.1 Facility Information 

• Is your tax ID (IRS #) valid? 

• Are all the contacts on your forms correct? 

• Is BAQ’s map of your sub facilities correct? 

• Do you have any sub facilities not included in the map? 

2.1.2 Sub Facility Information 

• Are your units of measure correct? (AIMS/eFACTS automatically defaults to the units used last year.) 

• Does your SCC match BAQ’s? 

• Have you submitted throughput data by month for each sub facility? 

• Have you included date effective and date end? 

• How about days per week, total days, and total hours? 

• If you have manually calculated your emissions, have you explained how you did it? (Please provide 

as many details as possible.) 

• Does the Pollutant Summary page include all emissions? 

• Does the summary page compare with the other emissions you have entered? 

2.1.3 Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) 

• Have you speciated your HAPs emissions by sub facility? 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 3 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

2.2 AP-42 and FIRE 

AP-42 is a compilation of air pollutant emission factors containing the same factors used for sub Facility 

Classification Codes (SCCs). AP-42 uses factors for general sub facility categories. AP-42 contains a variety 

of methods for calculating emissions for any given sub facility type. The Bureau of Air Quality currently uses 

version 6.23 from October 2000. The AP-42 series is available in several media. AP-42 is available free 

online at www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/index.html 

The Factor Information REtrieval (FIRE) database contains emission estimation factors for criteria and 

hazardous air pollutants. FIRE factors are very specific for sub facility type. FIRE offers sub facility specific 

factors, and does not provide multiple calculation methods ranked by preference. More information about 

FIRE may be obtained at www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/fire/index.html . 

Please note: If comparing factors in FIRE against AP-42, the FIRE factors should take 

precedence because the FIRE version is more recent. 

Paper copies of AP-42 may be obtained from the Government Printing Office (GPO) in Washington, 

DC. Orders must be prepaid (except for other federal agencies or college bookstores). The stock number for 

the 5th edition of AP-42 (“Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors; Volume I: Stationary Point And Area 

Sub Facilities”) is S/N 055-000-00500-1. Supplement A is S/N 055-000-00551-6. Supplement B is S/N 055-

000-00565-6. The Government Printing Office can be contacted for current pricing at: 

US GPO Superintendent of Documents 

P.O. Box 371954 

Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954 

www.gpo.gov

phone 866-512-1800 

fax 202-512-2250 

Mail orders must include a check or money order made out to the “Superintendent of Documents”. 

The Air CHIEF compact disc (CD-ROM), with AP-42 and other hazardous air pollutant emission 

estimation reports and databases, can be purchased from the Government Printing Office. The item number is 

S/N 055-000-00643-1. 

For further information on Air CHIEF and other aspects of emission estimation, call U.S. EPA’s Info 

CHIEF help line at 919-541-1000 during regular office hours, Eastern Time. The CHIEF web page is 

www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ . EPA does not have the staff or the structure to provide engineering support. 

If you have factor needs, new data, questions, or suggestions for U.S. EPA, please send them to this 

address: 

AP-42 Team (MD 14) 

Emission Factor and Inventory Group 

Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division 

Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 4 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

2.3 Industry-Specific Emission Factors 

Industry groups have also developed emission factors. You may want to contact your group to obtain 

any factors that exist. 

2.4 Standard Industrial Classification and North American Industry 

Classification System 

The U.S. Bureau of Census has replaced its Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system with the 

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). SICs have been converted to the 2002 version of the 

NAICS codes in AIMS/eFACTS where possible. In some cases, a conversion was not possible. The NAICS is 

also required by the IRS, and your financial department may have this information for you. 

NAICS information is available from a federal website. Copies are available for download or purchase. 

Go to http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html or the NAICS link on BAQ’s web site at 

http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/airwaste/aq/emission/Emission_Inventory.htm

2.5 Small Business Assistance 

The Environmental Management Assistance Program (EMAP) is a program in Pennsylvania designed 

to help small businesses understand and comply with environmental regulations and identify pollution 

prevention and energy efficiency opportunities. There are four ways to request assistance from EMAP: Call 

regulations.877-ask-emap, visit the website at www.askemap.org, send an email to questions@askemap.org

or contact your local Small Business Development Center (check www.pasbdc.org for the center nearest you). 

Services such as site visits and permit reviews are confidential and provided at no charge. Business names 

and addresses will not be released to any regulatory agency. 

The DEP Small Business Ombudsman, Jeanne Dworetzky, helps businesses locate sources of funding 

to install equipment and process changes which result in pollution prevention or energy efficiency. She can 

also represent small business interests to DEP. Jeanne Dworetzky can be reached at 717-772-5942 or 

jdworetsky@state.pa.us. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 5 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

3. Instructions For Determining Which Facilities Belong In 

AIMS/eFACTS For Inventory Purposes 

These guidelines are a synthesis of the inventory requirements of Title V, the Annual Inventory, 

Emission Statements and other regulations that are part of the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Title V 

regulation is found in the Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 127. The Annual Inventory regulation is found 

in the Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 135.1-135.5. The Emission Statement regulation is found in 

Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 135.21. The definition of the term “Title V Facility” can be found in the 

Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 121.1. Exemptions from state operating permits can be found at 

www.depweb.state.pa.us, Keyword: "Air Permits". Search for document number 275-2101-003 Plan Approval 

and Operating Permit Exemption List (pdf file in the eLibrary). For information on permitting, contact the 

Bureau of Air Quality’s Division of Permits at717-787- 717-787-4325. 

Owners/operators of facilities that wish to generate or trade Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs) will 

need to document emissions. The AES is one way to document emissions. All owners/operators of facilities 

have the option of submitting the AES for ERC purposes. If the facility’s owner/operator does not submit the 

AES, the facility’s owner/operator should at least maintain sufficient production records to be able to 

reconstruct emissions for ERC purposes and for audits. 

The emissions from any facility that is not required to submit annual inventory forms are captured in the 

area source inventory, which is calculated using demographics and emission factors. For information on area 

source inventory, contact the Bureau of Air Quality’s Division of Air Information at 717-787-9702. 

Any emissions that are below the source reporting thresholds for facilities that are subject to 

the annual inventory will be calculated by BAQ using emission factors. Owners/operators of facilities 

have the option of submitting emission estimates for emissions below the sub facility thresholds if the facility’s 

estimate is better than the factor-generated numbers. 

3.1 Title V Facilities 

All owners/operators of Title V facilities must complete the AES. Owners/operators of Title V facilities 

are subject to the Annual Emission Statement because by definition they exceed the reporting thresholds in 

the Emission Statement and SIP regulations. Inventory information from Title V facilities is used for emission 

fee purposes and, in combination with other information, to demonstrate compliance. The RAQ staff determine 

which sub facilities will appear on the AIMS/eFACTS reporting forms. In some cases, the facility’s 

owner/operator and RAQ staff may agree to treat multiple pieces of related equipment as one sub facility in the 

Title V permit. The facility’s owner/operator must provide operating schedules and throughputs for all sub 

facilities on the forms. NOx, SOx, VOC, PM10, PM2.5, ammonia (NH3) and CO emissions of 1.0 ton per year 

or more per sub facility must be reported on a sub facility by sub facility basis. Report to the nearest hundredth 

(0.00) of a ton. 

All HAPs must be reported. HAPs must be reported individually (speciated). Any HAP emissions 

greater than 0.5 ton per speciated HAP per sub facility per year must be reported on a sub facility by sub 

facility basis. Report to the nearest hundredth (0.00) of a ton. Sub facility-by-sub facility speciated reporting of 

HAPs is required for Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) purposes. In cases where HAPs are 

also VOCs or particulates, do not subtract the HAP emission estimates from the VOC or particulate emission 

estimates. The subtraction will be dealt with by BAQ’s AIMS/eFACTS database. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 6 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Based upon the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 112 (C) (6), certain pollutants are of special concern. 

For these HAPs of special concern, owners/operators of facilities should report any emissions above the 

following thresholds:

Polychlorobiphenols (PCB) 0.01 tons/yr per sub facility 

Mercury (Hg) 0.01 tons/yr per sub facility 

Lead (Pb) 0.01 tons/yr per sub facility 

Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 tons/yr per sub facility 

Dioxins 0.00001 tons/yr or 0.02 pounds/yr per sub facility 

Furans 0.00001 tons/yr or 0.02 pounds/yr per sub facility 

As all HAPs must be reported and as some sub facilities are considered insignificant and not included on the 

reporting forms, use the “Other Sub Facility” block on the reporting forms to reconcile the facility totals with 

individual sub facility estimates. 

3.2 Non-Title V Facilities 

Owners/operators of Non-Title V facilities may be required to complete the AES for several reasons: 

the Emission Statement regulation, permit cap compliance certification and State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

purposes. DEP may also request inventory information from any facility, per the Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, 

Chapter 135. The Emission Statement, permit caps and SIP are discussed in paragraphs 1-3 below. 

3.2.1 Facilities Inventoried for Emission Statement Purposes 

The Emission Statement regulation is found in Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 135.21. Owners 

or operators of facilities that are located in Bucks, Chester, Delaware, or Montgomery Counties that emits or 

have a potential to emit 25 tons or more per year of VOC or 25 tons or more per year of NOx are required 

owner/operator to report. Owners or operators of facilities located in the remainder of the Commonwealth that 

emits or has a potential to emit 50 tons or more per year of VOC or 100 tons or more per year of NOx must

complete the AES. Facilities that emit less than 25 tons per year of either oxides of nitrogen or VOC and 

that are on the exemption list in Section 3.2.1.1 of this document do not have to complete the AES. 

Owners or operators of facilities located in Allegheny or Philadelphia Counties should contact 

the county agency listed in Sections 9.7 and 9.8 for reporting instructions. 

Owners/operators of Non-Title V facilities subject to the Emission Statement regulation must report 

throughputs and operating schedules for all sub facilities in AIMS/eFACTS. In addition, these 

owners/operators of facilities must report VOC and NOx actual emissions of 1.0 TPY or more per sub facility. 

Emissions less than 1.0 ton per year do not have to be reported. Report to the nearest hundredth (0.00) of a 

ton. All emissions must be reported sub facility by sub facility, not as facility totals. The emission estimates for 

other pollutants will be calculated by Air Quality’s AIMS/eFACTS database using emission factors. The 

facility’s owner/operator has the option of reporting emission estimates for other pollutants if the facility’s 

owner/operator’s estimates are better than the factor-based calculations. These facilities may also be required 

to report HAPs. Please refer to Section 3.1 of this document. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 7 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

3.2.1.1. Emission Statement Exemptions 

The following list of exemptions was published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 23, Number 17, 

pages 1994-95 on April 24, 1993: 

• Non-Industrial Surface Coating: 

3⁄4 Architectural 

3⁄4 Automotive Refinishing 

• Other Solvent Use 

3⁄4 Electronics and Electrical Degreasing 

3⁄4 Other Manufacturing Degreasing 

3⁄4 Automotive Repair Cold Cleaning Degreasing 

3⁄4 Manufacturing Cold Cleaning Degreasing 

3⁄4 Dry cleaning 

3⁄4 Graphic Arts 

• Surface Coatings 

3⁄4 Flatwood Products 

3⁄4 Furniture & Fixtures 

3⁄4 Electrical Insulation 

3⁄4 Metal Cans 

3⁄4 Miscellaneous Finished Products 

3⁄4 Machinery & Equipment 

3⁄4 Appliances 

3⁄4 New Motor Vehicles 

3⁄4 Marine 

3⁄4 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 

3⁄4 Maintenance 

3⁄4 Other Special Coatings 

• Waste Management Practices 

3⁄4 Publicly-Owned Treatment Works 

3⁄4 Landfills 

3⁄4 Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities 

• Small Stationary Fossil Fuels* 

3⁄4 Fuel Oil Combustion 

3⁄4 Coal Combustion 

3⁄4 Gas Combustion 

• Miscellaneous Sub Facilities 

3⁄4 On-Site Incineration (does not include open burning) 

3⁄4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks 

*The sizes of small stationary fossil fuel sources are defined by Chapter 127.14, Permit Exemptions. 

3.2.2 Facilities Inventoried for Permit Cap Compliance Certification 

Some owners/operators of facilities have taken permit restrictions in order to avoid major status and a 

federally enforceable permit. Also, a facility may have a sub facility cap for other reasons. The method of 

demonstrating cap compliance is addressed in the permit. The AES may be used to demonstrate cap 

compliance. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 8 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

3.2.3 Facilities Inventoried for State Implementation Planning Purposes 

Owners/operators of synthetic minor facilities are subject to the inventory and must complete the 

AIMS/eFACTS reporting forms if actual VOC emissions are greater than or equal to 10 TPY for the facility. 

This VOC threshold was established to meet EPA’s ozone planning requirements. The facility’s 

owner/operator must report annually. Owners/operators of synthetic minor facilities subject to the inventory 

must report throughputs and operating schedules for all sub facilities on the AIMS/eFACTS reporting forms. In 

addition, these owners/operators of facilities must report VOC actual emissions as a facility total. Report to the 

nearest hundredth of a ton. The emission estimates for other pollutants will be calculated by Air Quality’s 

AIMS/eFACTS database using emission factors. The facility’s owner/operator has the option of reporting 

emission estimates for other pollutants if the facility’s owner/operator’s estimates are better than the factorbased calculations.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 9 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

4. Commonly Asked Questions About Inventory Reporting 

Nitrogen oxide (NO) is listed on the Title V pollutant list. Fees are paid for nitrogen dioxide (NO2). 

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are reported for inventory but are actually NO2. Should the Title V NO be 

reported as NO, as NO2, or as NOx? 

 Report NOx as NO2. 

If a facility’s owner/operator has completed some emission estimates incorrectly before receiving 

these instructions, does the facility’s owner/operator need to go back and fix them? If so, when? 

Yes. Incorrectly completed facility emission estimates should be corrected as soon as possible by 

notifying the RAQ staff. 

Which sub facilities must be tracked and reported for inventory?

Owners/operators of facilities are responsible for reporting on any sub facilities identified by RAQ staff. 

If a sub facility does not appear on the preprinted forms or web site, the sub facility is not automatically 

exempted from reporting. 

For the purposes of Title V fees, owners/operators of facilities must provide emission estimates and 

pay fees on all sub facilities covered by the regulations, whether or not the sub facilities appear on the AES. 

Any owners/operators of facilities that are applying for synthetic minor status must document all 

parameters that they agree to cap in their application. These caps are in place from the time the synthetic 

minor application was submitted. Therefore, any facility’s owner/operator that has applied for a synthetic minor 

permit and has agreed to cap production must document compliance with the caps. The AES is one method of 

documenting compliance. Please contact your RAQ staff for more information on documenting compliance. 

Blank reporting forms for sub facilities not currently in AIMS/eFACTS are included in this Instruction 

booklet, and may also be downloaded from the DEP web site or obtained from RAQ staff. 

If a sub facility is missing from the AES, did the facility’s owner/operator have to report any HAPs, 

including fugitives, emitted from the missing sub facilities? 

If applicable requirements (such as BAT) exist for the sub facility, the sub facility must be added to 

AIMS/eFACTS so that sub facility-specific HAPS can be reported. If applicable requirements do not exist, the 

facility’s owner/operator must report all HAPS but can report the HAPs as speciated facility totals. 

Please clarify the current and future policies on aggregating small, similar sub facilities. 

Any aggregation of small similar sub facilities will have to be done via the permit. Please contact your 

RAQ staff to discuss aggregating sub facilities. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 10 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

If a facility was in the 2002 baseline inventory with significant emissions, but has now changed 

processes so that the facility is not subject to the AES under the current guidance, what should the 

facility’s owner/operator do? 

The facility’s owner/operator will not have to report the AES. The facility will not be deleted from the 

AIMS/eFACTS database because DEP needs to maintain all emission information from previous years in case 

the facility generates Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs). Also, deletion would cause the facility to disappear 

from the baseline inventory. The facility will be left in the AIMS/eFACTS database and marked as not subject 

to the AES. 

EPA has adopted new National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone and fine particulates. The 

EPA implementation rules for these pollutants establish 2002 as the new baseline inventory year. Facility 

owners/operators should review their 2002 inventory to determine whether they should report. Please contact 

RAQ staff if you need to be added to the 2002 inventory. 

What version of the Source Classification Codes (SCCs) should be used? 

Use version 6.23 from October 2000. Information can be found at 

www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/software/fire/index.html . 

Will DEP request inventory information for previous operating years from companies that have been 

operating since 1990 but have not reported previously?

Yes, these companies will need to be added to the 1990 baseline inventory and other periodic 

inventories. The RAQ staff will notify the companies of the information needed. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 11 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

5. Elaboration On Worksheet Contents, For All Firm-Plants 

5.1 Throughputs For Each Source 

Throughputs must be tracked and reported in monthly increments for each sub facility. If an operating 

schedule changes during a month, you must provide a throughput for each operating schedule in 

effect that month. Monthly throughputs are required to accommodate various data reports generated from 

AIMS/eFACTS, such as quarterly reporting with a December start date, or quarterly percentages. 

Note: If there is not enough space provided on the preprinted forms to submit all operating schedules 

and throughputs and/or new SCCs, use the form WORKSHEET FOR ADDITIONAL OPERATING 

SCHEDULES FOR EXISTING SUB FACILITY/SCCs, OR ADDITIONAL SUB FACILITY/SCCs FOR EXISTING 

SUB FACILITIES. 

5.2 Operating Schedules For Each Source 

DEP recognizes that owners/operators of facilities may change operating schedules during the year. 

Owners/operators of primary facilities must provide at least one operating schedule for each sub facility. 

Owners/operators of primary facilities may provide multiple operating schedules per sub facility if an operating 

schedule changes significantly during the year. Examples of significant changes could be a piece of 

equipment shut down for more than two weeks or a change from 1 shift to 2 or 3 (and vice versa). Consult with 

RAQ staff for guidance. Keep in mind that worst-case production numbers will yield worst-case emissions 

numbers when emissions are calculated in AIMS/eFACTS using SCCs. 

For each sub facility operating schedule, the facility’s owner/operator must provide: 

1. Start date of the operating schedule, 

2. End date of the operating schedule. 

Additionally, for each operating schedule 2 of the following 3 must be provided: 

1. Total hours the sub facility operated during that particular operating schedule, 

2. Total days the sub facility operated during that particular operating schedule, and 

3. Average days per week the sub facility operated during that particular operating schedule. 

If you are trying to report a shutdown period for a sub facility, you end the current operating schedule 

when the shutdown occurs and start a new operating schedule when the shutdown is over. For example, if 

your plant were shut down from July 1 to July 15, you would have: 

Operating schedule 1: Date effective = January 1 

Date end = June 30 

Operating schedule 2: Date effective = July 16 

Date end = December 31 

Note: If there is not enough space provided on the preprinted forms to submit all operating schedules 

and throughputs and/or new SCCs, contact your DEP regional office. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 12 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

5.3 Emission Estimates 

Owners/operators of facilities must provide an estimate of the tons of NOx, VOC, PM10, PM2.5, SOX, 

NH3 and CO emitted per year for each sub facility within the plant. See Section 5.8 of this document for HAP 

reporting. 

Owners/operators of facilities must also indicate the method used to calculate the emissions. 

Calculation Method Codes are listed in the back of the instructions. Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) 

data is the most reliable for emission estimates and should be used when available. 

5.4 Fuel Analysis 

Percent sulfur, percent ash and Btu content must be reported for all fuels. Report zeros where 

appropriate. Check with the DEP contact for your county or your RAQ staff to determine the analytical results 

that must be reported. 

5.5 Surface Coating (Paint, Glue, Ink) Analysis 

Percent water, coating density, and total volatile content must be reported for all water- and solventbased coatings used. If possible, include a list of all coatings and their associated analyses with your 

submission. Some DEP regions provide VOC worksheets to aid reporting. Contact your RAQ staff for the 

preferred reporting format. 

5.6 Control Devices 

The owners/operators of new facilities and previously unreported sub facilities must report control 

efficiencies for every pollutant controlled by a control device. These pollutants may include VOCS, NOX, SOX, 

CO, PM 10, PM2.5 and NH3. If the primary control system does not capture 100 percent of the sub facility 

emissions, both a fugitive emission point and a regular stack should be reported. Capture and control are 

not the same. A device may control 90 percent of the captured VOCs but capture only 80 percent of the 

VOCs generated by the sub facility. 

If your facility’s owner/operator is planning to add, modify, or remove control devices, your RAQ staff 

should be notified prior to the change. 

5.7 Stacks 

The owners/operators of new facilities and previously unreported sub facilities must report stack inside 

diameter, height, exhaust flow in ACFM, exhaust velocity in meters or feet per second, exhaust temperature, 

exhaust percent moisture and the direction of stack discharge. Stack information is requested on all forms 

except the WORKSHEET FOR A NEW FIRM-PLANT and the WORKSHEET FOR NEW FUEL MATERIAL 

LOCATIONS. 

Note: If your facility’s owner/operator is planning to add, modify, or remove stacks, your DEP inspector 

should be notified prior to the change and the form WORKSHEET FOR NEW STACKS or the WORKSHEET 

FOR CHANGES TO EXISTING CONTROL DEVICES OR STACKS FOR EXISTING SUB FACILITYS should 

be submitted. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 13 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

5.8 Hazardous Air Pollutants 

Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) estimates are required for certain plants. Please refer to Chapter III. 

Guidance For Determining Which Facilities Belong in AIMS/eFACTS For Inventory Purposes for more 

information. All HAPs that must be reported are listed in Chapters XII to XVI. A calculation method is required 

with the HAP estimates. Refer to Chapter XI., Calculation Method Codes For Emissions. Additional 

information can be found in the Pennsylvania Code, Chapter 121.1 under "Title V regulated air pollutants". 

You must use the reporting form provided in the Appendix or with your preprinted input forms. 

There are de minimus levels for HAP reporting. If the total HAP emissions from a facility are less than 

one (1) ton per year per HAP, the facility’s owner/operator is not required to report Haps. However, if the 

facility has over one (1) ton per year of any HAP that Hap needs to be reported for each sub facility that emits 

that specific HAP. For example, a facility has 1.5 tons per year of benzene emissions from three sub facilities 

and 0.75 tons per year of toluene emissions. The three sub facilities emit 1 ton, 950 pounds and 50 pounds of 

toluene respectively. The facility’s owner/operator must report the three sources of benzene 

All HAPs must be reported. HAPs must be reported individually (speciated). Any HAP emissions 

greater than 0.5 ton per speciated HAP per sub facility per year must be reported on a sub facility by sub 

facility basis. Report to the nearest hundredth of a ton. Sub facility by sub facility speciated reporting of HAPs 

is required for Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) purposes. 

In some cases HAPs are also VOCs or particulates, such as trichloroethylene. Do not subtract the 

HAP emission estimates from the VOC or particulate emission estimates. The subtraction will be dealt with by 

Air Quality’s AIMS/eFACTS database. 

Based upon the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 112 (C) (6), certain pollutants are of special concern. 

For these HAPs of special concern, owners/operators of facilities should report any emissions above 

the following thresholds:

Polychlorobiphenols (PCB) 0.01 TPY per sub facility 

Mercury (Hg) 0.01 TPY per sub facility 

Lead (Pb) 0.01 TPY per sub facility 

Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 TPY per sub facility 

Dioxins 0.00001 TPY per sub facility 

Furans 0.00001 TPY per sub facility 

As all HAPs must be reported and as some sub facilities are considered insignificant and not included on the 

reporting forms, use the “Other Sub Facility” block on the reporting forms to reconcile the facility totals with 

individual sub facility estimates. 

5.9 Site Pollutant Summary 

The form summarizes the annual emissions of NOX, SOX, VOC, PM10, PM 2.5, NH3 and CO for the 

facility. You must use the reporting form provided in the Appendix or with your preprinted input forms. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 14 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

6. Confidentiality 

Confidential status must be requested in a letter to the DEP regional office annually. The letter 

must specify the sub facilities and information that are affected, and the reasons for needing confidentiality. 

Confidentiality is discussed in Section 13.2 of the Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act. Only throughputs 

and operating schedules can be treated as confidential in AIMS/eFACTS. Confidential throughputs and 

operating schedules are not provided in basic reports requested by the public and agencies other than EPA. 

Confidential throughputs and operating schedules are not provided to EPA. 

7. Certification of Data Accuracy for Emission Statement 

This form must be completed annually by the owners/operators of facilities that are subject to the 

Emission Statement regulation. You must use the form provided in the Appendix or with your preprinted input 

forms. If you are using the form in the Appendix, make sure to fill in your Primary Facility ID (assigned by 

DEP) in the space at the top of the form. 

8. Extensions Beyond March 1 

As per 25 Pa. Code Section 135.3(c) a facility’s owner/operator may request an extension of time from 

the Department for the filing of the annual emission inventory, and the Department may grant the extension for 

reasonable cause. Extension requests should be made in writing to the RAQ contact listed in these 

Instructions. Include the reason for the request and the expected date by which the inventory report will be 

submitted. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 15 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

9. DEP Contact Listings 

Please return the completed forms to the appropriate RAQ representative from the following contact 

listing. If you have questions about the forms, please call your RAQ representative. 

9.1 Contact Listing, Norristown - Region I (Southeast) 

Contact County

James Rebarchak 

Southeast Regional Office 

2 East Main Street 

Norristown, PA 19401 

(484) 250-7503 

Montgomery County 

Kevin McLemore 

Southeast Regional Office 

2 East Main Street 

Norristown, PA 19401 

(484) 250-7502250-5900 

Chester County 

Delaware County 

Kevin McLemore 

Southeast Regional Office 

2 East Main Street 

Norristown, PA 19401 

(484) 250-7502 

Chester County 

Delaware County 

Shawn Mountain 

Southeast Regional Office 

2 East Main Street 

Norristown, PA 19401 

(484) 250-7504 

Bucks County 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 16 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

9.2 Contact Listing, Wilkes-Barre - Region II (Northeast) 

Contact County

Roger Bellas 

Northeast Regional Office 

Two Public Square 

Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711-0790 

(570) 826-2464 

Lackawanna County 

Luzerne County 

Pike County 

Monroe County (except: 

Schuylkill County 

Susquehanna County 

Wayne County 

Wyoming County 

Stroudsburg 

East Stroudsburg 

Stroud 

Ross 

Hamilton Township) 

Peter DiSabella 

Northeast Regional Office 

Two Public Square 

Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711-0790 

(610) 826-2345 

Lehigh County 

Northampton County 

Monroe County (partial): Stroudsburg 

East Stroudsburg 

Hamilton Township 

Ross 

Stroud 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 17 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

9.3 Contact Listing, Harrisburg - Region III (Southcentral) 

Contact County

Frederick Heagy 

Southcentral Regional Office 

909 Elmerton Ave. 

Harrisburg, PA 17110 

(717) 705-4886 

Cumberland County 

Dauphin County 

Lebanon County 

Perry County 

Susan Foster 

York District Office 

150 Roosevelt Avenue, Suite 200 

York, PA 17401-3381 

(717) 771-4481 

Adams County 

Franklin County 

York County 

Dave Bonga 

Lancaster District Office 

1661 Old Philadelphia Pike 

Lancaster, PA 17602 

(717) 390-2360 

Berks County 

Lancaster County 

Richard Roller 

Altoona District 

3001 Fairway Drive 

Altoona, PA 16602 

(814) 946-7294 

Bedford County 

Blair County 

Fulton County 

Juniata County 

Huntington County 

Mifflin County 

 

 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 18 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

9.4 Contact Listing, Williamsport - Region IV (Northcentral) 

 

Contact County

Muhammad Zaman 

Northcentral Regional Office 

208 West Third Street 

Suite 101 

Williamsport, PA 17701 

(570) 327-0512 

Bradford County 

Cameron County 

Centre County 

Clearfield County 

Clinton County 

Columbia County 

Lycoming County 

Montour County 

Northumberland County 

Potter County 

Snyder County 

Sullivan County 

Tioga County 

Union County 

9.5 Contact Listing, Pittsburgh - Region V (Southwest) 

Contact County

Keith Gratzmiller 

Pittsburgh Regional Office 

400 Waterfront Drive 

Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4745 

(412) 442-4000 

Armstrong County 

Beaver County 

Greene County 

Washington County 

Dan Haney 

Greensburg District Office 

RR2, Box 603-C, Route 819S 

Greensburg, PA 15601-9802 

(724) 925-5415 

Cambria County 

Fayette County 

Indiana County 

Somerset County 

Westmoreland County 

 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 19 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

9.6 Contact Listing, Meadville - Region VI (Northwest) 

Contact County Township/Borough 

Staci Gustafson 

Northwest Regional Office 

230 Chestnut Street 

Meadville, PA 16335-3481 

(814) 332-6940 

Crawford County 

Erie County 

Mercer County (partial): Deer Creek Township 

Delaware Township 

Fairview Township 

Fredonia Borough 

French Creek Township 

Greene Township 

Greenville Borough 

Hempfield Township 

Jamestown Borough 

Lake Township 

Mill Creek Township 

New Lebanon Borough 

New Vernon Township 

Otter Creek Township 

Perry Township 

Pymatuning Township 

Salem Township 

Sandy Creek Township 

Sandy Lake Borough 

Sandy Lake Township 

Sheakleyville Borough 

Stoneboro Borough 

Sugar Grove Township 

West Salem Township 

Venango County (partial): Canal Township 

Cooperstown Borough 

French Creek Township 

Jackson Township 

Oakland Township 

Plum Township 

Sugarcreek Borough 

Utica Borough 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 20 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

9.6 Contact Listing, Meadville - Region VI (Northwest) (continued) 

Contact County Township/Borough 

Lori McNabb 

121 North Mill Street 

New Castle, PA 16101 

Butler County 

Lawrence County 

Mercer County (partial): Clark Boro 

Coolspring Township 

East Lackawannock 

Township 

Farrell 

Findley Township 

Grove City Borough 

Hermitage 

Hickory Township 

Jackson Center 

Jackson Township 

Jefferson Township 

Lackawannock Township 

Liberty Township 

Mercer 

Pine Township 

Sharon 

Sharpsville Borough 

Shenango Township 

South Pymatuning 

Township 

Springfield Township 

West Middlesex Borough 

Wheatland Borough 

Wilmington Township 

Wolf Creek Township 

Worth Township 

Venango County 

(partial):

Barkeyville Borough 

Clinton Township 

Clintonville Borough 

Emlenton Borough 

Franklin Borough 

Irwin Township 

Mineral Township 

Polk 

Sandycreek Township 

Scrubgrass Township 

Victory Township 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 21 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

9.6 Contact Listing, Meadville - Region VI (Northwest) (continued) 

Contact County Township/Borough 

David Bubbenmoyer 

Northwest Regional 

Office 

230 Chestnut Street, 

Meadville, PA 16335 

(814) 723-3273 

Clarion County 

Elk County 

Forest County 

Jefferson County 

McKean County 

Warren County 

Venango County (partial): Allegheny Township 

Cherrytree Township 

Cornplanter Township 

Cranberry Township 

Oil City 

Oil Creek Township 

Pinegrove Township 

Pleasantville Borough 

President Township 

Richland Township 

Rockland Township 

Rouseville Borough 

9.7 Contact Listing, Philadelphia Air Management Services 

Contact 

Assistant Director of Engineering 

Department of Public Health 

Air Management Services 

321 University Avenue 

Philadelphia, PA 19104 

(215) 875-5678 

9.8 Contact Listing, Allegheny County Health Department 

Contact 

Allegheny County Health Department 

Bureau of Air Pollution Control 

301 39th Street 

Pittsburgh, PA 15201 

(412) 578-8133 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 22 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

10. Calculation Method Codes For Emissions 

These codes are assigned by the facility’s owner/operator and describe the method used to calculate 

the emission estimates. Codes 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 are assigned within AIMS/eFACTS and should not be assigned 

by the facility’s owner/operator. 

CODE AIMS DESCRIPTION 

1 DEP Stack Test 

2 Company Stack Test Approved by DEP 

3 Other Company Test Approved by DEP 

9 See Comment

10 Company SCC Factor 

11 Company Material Balance 

12 Company Efficiency of Control Device 

13 Company VOC Calculation 

14 Continuous Emission Monitoring 

15 AP-42

16 Company-Calculated Site Emission 

 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 23 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

11. Reliability Codes For Emissions 

Reliability codes are assigned by the RAQ staff or AIMS/eFACTS. The codes are provided in the 

instructions for informational purposes only. The following list is arranged in order of most reliable method 

of calculation to least reliable. Codes A, B, C, D, E and U are assigned by AIMS/eFACTS and describe the 

reliability of the SCC used. 

CODE DESCRIPTION 

CEM 

BST 

ST 

DVC 

CVC 

MMB 

ME 

RE 

EMB 

COM 

A 

B 

C 

D 

E 

SITE 

U 

NA 

Continuous Emission Monitoring 

Best Stack Test 

Stack Test 

DEP VOC Calculation 

Company VOC Calculation 

Measured Material Balance 

Measured Efficiency 

Rated Efficiency 

Estimated Material Balance 

See Comment 

A Rated Factor 

B Rated Factor 

C Rated Factor 

D Rated Factor 

E Rated Factor 

Site-Level Manual Emission 

U Unrated Factor 

N/A For Plant Total 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 24 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

12. Abbreviations/Acronyms 

 

Abbreviation/Acronym Definition 

ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute 

ACT Actual

AIMS Air Information Management System (BAQ’s database module of 

eFACTS) 

AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System (EPA’s database) 

BAQ Bureau of Air Quality 

BTU British thermal units 

CAS Chemical abstract service 

CD Control device

CO Carbon monoxide

CU Combustion unit

DEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

eFACTS environment, Facility, Application, Compliance Tracking System 

EHS Extremely Hazardous Substance 

EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency 

FML Fuel material location 

FUEL MAT LOC Fuel material location 

Hg Mercury

IN Incinerator

INC Incinerator

MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

MBTU Thousand Btu

MMBTU Million Btu

NAICS North American Industrial Classification System 

NOx Nitrogen oxides

Pb Lead

PCB Polychlorobiphenols

P000 General particulate

PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter 

PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter 

POM Polycyclic Organic Matter 

PR Process

PTE 

RAQ 

Potential to Emit 

Regional Air Quality 

SCC Sub Facility Classification Code 

SCFM Standard cubic feet per minute 

SIC Standard Industrial Classification 

SOx Sulfur oxides

TPY Tons per Year 

VOC Volatile organic compounds 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 25 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

13. Table A: Hazardous Air Pollutants (112 [b]) Sorted 

Alphabetically by Pollutant Name 

CAS POLLUTANT (Alphabetical By Pollutant Name)

75070 Acetaldehyde

60355 Acetamide

75058 Acetonitrile

98862 Acetophenone

53963 2-Acetylaminofluorene

107028 Acrolein

79061 Acrylamide

79107 Acrylic acid

107131 Acrylonitrile

107051 Allyl chloride

92671 4-Aminobiphenyl

62533 Aniline

90040 o-Anisidine

1332214 Asbestos

71432 Benzene (including Benzene from gasoline) 

92875 Benzidine

98077 Benzotrichloride

100447 Benzyl chloride

92524 Biphenyl

117817 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)

542881 Bis(chloromethyl)ether

75252 Bromoform

106990 1,3-Butadiene

156627 Calcium cyanamide

133062 Captan

63252 Carbaryl

75150 Carbon disulfide

56235 Carbon tetrachloride

463581 Carbonyl sulfide

120809 Catechol

133904 Chloramben

57749 Chlordane

7782505 Chlorine

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 26 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

CAS POLLUTANT (Alphabetical By Pollutant Name)

79118 Chloroacetic acid

532274 2-Chloroacetophenone

108907 Chlorobenzene

510156 Chlorobenzilate

67663 Chloroform

107302 Chloromethyl methyl ether 

126998 Chloroprene (2-chloro-1,3-butadiene)

1319773 Cresols/Cresylic acid (isomers and mixture) 

95487 o-Cresol

108394 m-Cresol

106445 p-Cresol

98828 Cumene (Isopropylbenzene)

94757 2,4-D, salts,esters (Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) 

72559 DDE (p,p-Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene)

334883 Diazomethane

132649 Dibenzofurans

96128 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

84742 Dibutylphthalate

106467 1,4-Dichlorobenzene

91941 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine

111444 Dichloroethyl ether (Bis(2 chloroethyl)ether) 

542756 1,3-Dichloropropene (mixture)

62737 Dichlorvos

111422 Diethanolamine

121697 N,N-Dimethylaniline

64675 Diethyl sulfate

119904 3,3-Dimethoxybenzidine

60117 Dimethyl aminoazobenzene

119937 3,3-Dimethyl benzidine

79447 Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride 

68122 Dimethyl formamide

57147 1,1-Dimethyl hydrazine

131113 Dimethyl phthalate

77781 Dimethyl sulfate

534521 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, and salts 

51285 2,4-Dinitrophenol

121142 2,4-Dinitrotoluene

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 27 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

CAS POLLUTANT (Alphabetical By Pollutant Name)

123911 1,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide)

122667 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine

106898 Epichlorohydrin (1-chloro-2,3-epoxypropane)

106887 1,2-Epoxybutane (1,2-Butylene oxide) 

140885 Ethyl acrylate

100414 Ethyl benzene

51796 Ethyl carbamate (Urethane) 

75003 Ethyl chloride (Chloroethane) 

106934 Ethylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane) 

107062 Ethylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloroethane) 

107211 Ethylene glycol

151564 Ethylene imine (Aziridine) 

75218 Ethylene oxide

96457 Ethylene thiourea

75343 Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-Dichloroethane) 

50000 Formaldehyde

76448 Heptachlor

118741 Hexachlorobenzene

87683 Hexachlorobutadiene

77474 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

67721 Hexachloroethane

822060 Hexamethylene 1,6-diisocyanate

680319 Hexamethylphosphoramide

110543 Hexane

302012 Hydrazine

7647010 Hydrochloric acid

7664393 Hydrogen fluoride (Hydrofluoric acid) 

123319 Hydroquinone

78591 Isophorone

58899 Lindane (gamma hexachlorocyclohexane) (all isomers) 

108316 Maleic anhydride

67561 Methanol

72435 Methoxychlor

74839 Methyl bromide (Bromomethane) 

74873 Methyl chloride (Chloromethane) 

71556 Methyl chloroform (1,1,1-Trichloroethane) 

78933 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 28 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

CAS POLLUTANT (Alphabetical By Pollutant Name)

60344 Methyl hydrazine

74884 Methyl iodide (Iodomethane) 

108101 Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) (Hexone) 

624839 Methyl isocyanate

80626 Methyl methacrylate

1634044 Methyl tert butyl ether 

101144 4,4-Methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline)

75092 Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 

101688 Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) 

101779 4,4-Methylenedianiline

91203 Naphthalene

98953 Nitrobenzene

92933 4-Nitrobiphenyl

100027 4-Nitrophenol

79469 2-Nitropropane

684935 N-Nitroso-N-methylurea

62759 N-Nitrosodimethylamine

59892 N-Nitrosomorpholine

56382 Parathion

82688 Pentachloronitrobenzene (Quintobenzene)

87865 Pentachlorophenol

108952 Phenol

106503 p-Phenylenediamine

75445 Phosgene

7803512 Phosphine

7723140 Phosphorus

85449 Phthalic anhydride

1336363 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's) (Aroclors) 

1120714 1,3-Propane sultone

57578 beta Propiolactone

123386 Propionaldehyde

114261 Propoxur (Baygon)

78875 Propylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloropropane) 

75569 Propylene oxide

75558 1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl aziridine) 

91225 Quinoline

106514 Quinone (1,4-benzoquinone)

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 29 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

CAS POLLUTANT (Alphabetical By Pollutant Name)

100425 Styrene

96093 Styrene oxide

1746016 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo p dioxin 

79345 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

127184 Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene)

7550450 Titanium tetrachloride

108883 Toluene

95807 2,4-Toluene diamine

584849 2,4-Toluene diisocyanate

95534 o-Toluidine

8001352 Toxaphene (chlorinated camphene) 

120821 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

79005 1,1,2-Trichloroethane

79016 Trichloroethylene

95954 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol

88062 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

121448 Triethylamine

1582098 Trifluralin

540841 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane

108054 Vinyl acetate

593602 Vinyl bromide (bromoethene) 

75014 Vinyl chloride

75354 Vinylidene chloride (1,1-Dichloroethylene) 

1330207 Xylenes (isomers and mixture) 

95476 o-Xylenes

108383 m-Xylenes

106423 p-Xylenes

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 30 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

14. Table B: Hazardous Air Pollutants (112 [b]) Sorted by 

Chemical Abstract Service Number 

CAS POLLUTANT (by Chemical Abstract Service Number)

50000 Formaldehyde

51285 2,4-Dinitrophenol

51796 Ethyl carbamate (Urethane) 

53963 2-Acetylaminofluorene

56235 Carbon tetrachloride

56382 Parathion

57147 1,1-Dimethyl hydrazine

57578 beta Propiolactone

57749 Chlordane

58899 Lindane (gamma hexachlorocyclohexane) (all isomers) 

59892 N-Nitrosomorpholine

60117 Dimethyl aminoazobenzene

60344 Methyl hydrazine

60355 Acetamide

62533 Aniline

62737 Dichlorvos

62759 N-Nitrosodimethylamine

63252 Carbaryl

64675 Diethyl sulfate

67561 Methanol

67663 Chloroform

67721 Hexachloroethane

68122 Dimethyl formamide

71432 Benzene (including Benzene from gasoline) 

71556 Methyl chloroform (1,1,1-Trichloroethane) 

72435 Methoxychlor

72559 DDE (p,p-Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene)

74839 Methyl bromide (Bromomethane) 

74873 Methyl chloride (Chloromethane) 

74884 Methyl iodide (Iodomethane) 

75003 Ethyl chloride (Chloroethane) 

75014 Vinyl chloride

75058 Acetonitrile

75070 Acetaldehyde

75092 Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 

75150 Carbon disulfide

75218 Ethylene oxide

75252 Bromoform

75343 Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-Dichloroethane) 

75354 Vinylidene chloride (1,1-Dichloroethylene) 

75445 Phosgene

75558 1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl aziridine) 

75569 Propylene oxide

76448 Heptachlor

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 31 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

CAS POLLUTANT (by Chemical Abstract Service Number)

77474 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

77781 Dimethyl sulfate

78591 Isophorone

78875 Propylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloropropane) 

78933 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 

79005 1,1,2-Trichloroethane

79016 Trichloroethylene

79061 Acrylamide

79107 Acrylic acid

79118 Chloroacetic acid

79345 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

79447 Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride 

79469 2-Nitropropane

80626 Methyl methacrylate

82688 Pentachloronitrobenzene (Quintobenzene)

84742 Dibutylphthalate

85449 Phthalic anhydride

87683 Hexachlorobutadiene

87865 Pentachlorophenol

88062 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

90040 o-Anisidine

91203 Naphthalene

91225 Quinoline

91941 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine

92524 Biphenyl

92671 4-Aminobiphenyl

92875 Benzidine

92933 4-Nitrobiphenyl

94757 2,4-D, salts,esters (Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) 

95476 o-Xylenes

95487 o-Cresol

95534 o-Toluidine

95807 2,4-Toluene diamine

95954 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol

96093 Styrene oxide

96128 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

96457 Ethylene thiourea

98077 Benzotrichloride

98828 Cumene (Isopropylbenzene)

98862 Acetophenone

98953 Nitrobenzene

100027 4-Nitrophenol

100414 Ethyl benzene

100425 Styrene

100447 Benzyl chloride

101144 4,4-Methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline)

101688 Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) 

101779 4,4-Methylenedianiline

106423 p-Xylenes

106445 p-Cresol

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 32 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

CAS POLLUTANT (by Chemical Abstract Service Number)

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

106503

106514

106887 

106467

p-Phenylenediamine

Quinone (1,4-benzoquinone)

1,2-Epoxybutane (1,2-Butylene oxide) 

106898 Epichlorohydrin (1-chloro-2,3-epoxypropane)

106934 Ethylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane) 

106990 1,3-Butadiene

107028 Acrolein

Allyl chloride

107062 

107131

107211 Ethylene glycol

Chloromethyl methyl ether 

108054

108101 

108316

108383

108394

108883

108907

108952

110543

111422

111444 Dichloroethyl ether (Bis(2 chloroethyl)ether) 

114261 Propoxur (Baygon)

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)

Hexachlorobenzene

107051

Ethylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloroethane) 

Acrylonitrile

107302 

Vinyl acetate

Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) (Hexone) 

Maleic anhydride

m-Xylenes

m-Cresol

Toluene

Chlorobenzene

Phenol

Hexane

Diethanolamine

117817

118741

119904 3,3-Dimethoxybenzidine

119937

120809

120821

121142 2,4-Dinitrotoluene

121448 Triethylamine

N,N-Dimethylaniline

123319

123386 Propionaldehyde

3,3-Dimethyl benzidine

Catechol

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

121697

122667 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine

Hydroquinone

123911 1,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide)

126998 Chloroprene (2-chloro-1,3-butadiene)

127184 Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene)

131113 Dimethyl phthalate

132649 Dibenzofurans

133062 Captan

133904 Chloramben

140885 Ethyl acrylate

151564 Ethylene imine (Aziridine) 

156627 Calcium cyanamide

Hydrazine

334883 Diazomethane

463581 Carbonyl sulfide

302012

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 33 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

CAS POLLUTANT (by Chemical Abstract Service Number)

510156 Chlorobenzilate

532274 2-Chloroacetophenone

534521 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, and salts 

540841 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane

542756 1,3-Dichloropropene (mixture)

542881 Bis(chloromethyl)ether

584849 2,4-Toluene diisocyanate

593602 Vinyl bromide (bromoethene) 

624839 Methyl isocyanate

680319 Hexamethylphosphoramide

684935 N-Nitroso-N-methylurea

822060 Hexamethylene 1,6-diisocyanate

1120714 1,3-Propane sultone

1319773 Cresols/Cresylic acid (isomers and mixture) 

1330207 Xylenes (isomers and mixture) 

1332214 Asbestos

1336363 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's) (Aroclors) 

1582098 Trifluralin

1634044 Methyl tert butyl ether 

1746016 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo p dioxin 

7550450 Titanium tetrachloride

7647010 Hydrochloric acid

7664393 Hydrogen fluoride (Hydrofluoric acid) 

7723140 Phosphorus

7782505 Chlorine

7803512 Phosphine

8001352 Toxaphene (chlorinated camphene) 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 34 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

15. Table C: Compounds As Listed In 112(b) 

Compound Name 

Antimony Compounds 

Arsenic Compounds (inorganic including arsine) 

Beryllium Compounds 

Cadmium Compounds 

Chromium Compounds 

Cobalt Compounds 

Coke Oven Emissions 

Cyanide Compounds 1

Fine mineral fibers 3

Glycol ethers 2

Lead Compounds 

Manganese Compounds 

Mercury Compounds 

Nickel Compounds 

Polycyclic Organic Matter 4

Radionuclides (including radon) 5

Selenium Compounds 

Note: Unless otherwise specified, “Glycol ethers” and all listings above that contain the word 

“compounds” are defined as including any unique chemical substance that contains the named chemical (i.e., 

antimony, arsenic, etc.) as part of that chemical’s infrastructure. 

 1 X’CN where X = H’ or any other group where a formal dissociation may occur. For example, 

KCN or Ca(CN)2 .

 2 Includes mono- and di-ethers of ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol 

R(OCH2CH2)n-OR’ where 

n = 1, 2, or 3 

R = alkyl or aryl groups 

R’ = R, H, or groups which, when removed, yield glycol ethers with the structure: 

R(OCH2CH2)n-OH. Polymers are excluded from the glycol category. 

 3 Includes mineral fibers emissions from facilities manufacturing or processing glass, rock, or 

slag fibers (or other mineral derived fibers) of average diameter 1 micrometer or less.

 4 Includes organic compounds with more than one benzene ring, and which have a boiling 

point greater than or equal to 100 o

 C.

 

 5 A type of atom that spontaneously undergoes radioactive decay. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 35 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix A WORKSHEET FOR A NEW FACILITY 

Date*: For Year*: Tax ID/Plant Code*:

Facility Name*: Primary Facility ID*:

Region*: County*: Municipality*:

SIC*: NAICS:

Contact Type Name Address Telephone 

Firm* 

Location 

Corporate 

Fee 

Inspection 

Permit 

Responsible 

Official 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 36 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix A WORKSHEET FOR A NEW FACILITY (cont’d) 

Location Information 

Latitude*: UTM Elevation: North:

Longitude*: Coordinates Zone: East:

Fuel Use Summary* 

Type Total Use Type Total Use 

Pollutant Summary* 

(Sum of Individual and Miscellaneous Sub Facilities) 

Emission Estimates (0.00 Tons/Year) 

Ammonia PM10

CO PM2.5

Lead SOX

NOX VOC

*Indicates a required field

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 37 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix B WORKSHEET FOR MISCELLANEOUS SOURCE 

EMISSIONS 

Date*: ____________________ For Year*: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code*: _________________ 

Facility Name*: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID*: _________________ 

Other Miscellaneous Sub Facility Emissions (Criteria/HAPs/Non-Criteria) 

Sub Facility (optional 

name) Pollutant CAS Amount (0.00) Calc Method 

Note: Most criteria pollutants and HAPs need to be reported if greater than 0.5 TPY. The following pollutants need to be 

reported if greater than the amount listed: 

Polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs) 0.01 TPY 

Mercury (Hg) 0.01 TPY 

Lead (Pb) 0.01 TPY 

Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 TPY 

Dioxins 0.02 Lbs/Yr 

Furans 0.02 Lbs/Yr

*Indicates a required field

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 38 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix C WORKSHEET FOR NEW COMBUSTION UNITS 

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________ 

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________ 

Unit Name: 

Description:

Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

DEP Permit No.: Connected to FML(s)?: 

Actual Emission Estimates (Tons/Yr) for Emission Fees and Emission Statements 

Pollutant CAS Emission Amt (0.00 TPY) Calculation Method 

CO

Lead

NH3

NOX

PM10

PM2.5

SOX

VOC

Additional Pollutants (enter HAPs individually): 

NOTE: Most Criteria pollutants and HAPS need to be reported if greater than 0.5 TPY. The following pollutants need to be 

reported if greater than the amounts listed: 

Polychlorobiphenols (PCB) 0.01 TPY 

Mercury (Hg) 0.01 TPY 

Lead (Pb) 0.01 TPY 

Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 TPY 

Dioxins (submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr 

Furans (submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 39 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix C WORKSHEET FOR NEW COMBUSTION UNITS (cont’d) 

First Fuel Burned: ________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr: _________________________ 

SCC, if known: ________________ _____________________________________________________ 

FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft3: ____________ 

SCHEDULE 1 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

SCHEDULE 2 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

2nd Fuel Burned: ________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr: _________________________ 

SCC, if known: ________________ _____________________________________________________ 

FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft3: ____________ 

SCHEDULE 1 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

SCHEDULE 2 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 40 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix C WORKSHEET FOR NEW COMBUSTION UNITS (cont’d) 

First Control Device 

Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate 

(gal/min): 

DEP ID number? Is Material Collected/ Land 

filled on Site? 

Pollutant Control Efficiencies 

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other) 

Second Control Device 

Type (Bughouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate 

(gal/min): 

DEP ID number? Is Material Collected Land 

filled on Site? 

Pollutant Control Efficiencies 

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other) 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 41 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix C WORKSHEET FOR NEW COMBUSTION UNITS (cont’d) 

First Stack 

Inside Diameter: Height: 

Flow Volume ACFM: Velocity (m/sec): 

Distance to Nearest Property Line: 

Temperature °F: Moisture %: DEP ID Number? 

Stack Discharge Type: ________ 

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening 

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction 

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal 

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward 

Z = Fugitive Emissions 

Second Stack 

Inside Diameter: Height: 

Flow Volume ACFM: Velocity (m/sec): 

Distance to Nearest Property Line: 

Temperature °F: Moisture %: DEP ID Number? 

Stack Discharge Type: ________ 

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening 

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction 

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal 

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward 

Z = Fugitive Emissions 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 42 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES 

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________ 

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________ 

Process Name: 

Description:

Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

DEP Permit No.: Connected to FML(s)?: 

Actual Emission Estimates (Tons/Yr) for Emission Fees and Emission Statements 

Pollutant CAS Emission Amt (0.00 TPY) Calculation Method 

CO

Lead

NH3

NOX

PM10

PM2.5

SOX

VOC

Additional Pollutants (enter HAPs individually): 

NOTE: Most Criteria pollutants and HAPS need to be reported if greater than 0.5 TPY. The following pollutants need to be 

reported if greater than the amounts listed: 

Polychlorobiphenols (PCB) 0.01 TPY 

Mercury (Hg) 0.01 TPY 

Lead (Pb) 0.01 TPY 

Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 TPY 

Dioxins (Submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr 

Furans (Submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 43 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES (cont’d) 

First Material Processed or Produced: _____________________________________________________ 

SCC, if known: ________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr: _________________________ 

SCHEDULE 1 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

SCHEDULE 2 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

2nd Material Processed or Produced: _____________________________________________________ 

SCC, if known: ________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr: _________________________ 

SCHEDULE 1 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

SCHEDULE 2 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 44 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES (cont’d) 

First Fuel Burned: ________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr: _________________________ 

SCC, if known: ________________ _____________________________________________________ 

FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft3: ____________ 

SCHEDULE 1 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

SCHEDULE 2 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

2nd Fuel Burned: ________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr: _________________________ 

SCC, if known: ________________ _____________________________________________________ 

FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft3: ____________ 

SCHEDULE 1 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

SCHEDULE 2 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 45 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES (cont’d) 

First Control Device 

Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate 

(gal/min): 

DEP ID number? Is Material Collected/ 

Landfilled on Site? 

Pollutant Control Efficiencies 

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other) 

Second Control Device 

Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate 

(gal/min): 

DEP ID number? Is Material Collected/ 

Landfilled on Site? 

Pollutant Control Efficiencies 

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other) 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 46 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES (cont’d) 

First Stack 

Inside Diameter: Height: 

Flow Volume ACFM: Velocity (m/sec): 

Distance to Nearest Property Line: 

Temperature °F: Moisture %: DEP ID Number? 

Stack Discharge Type: ________ 

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening 

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction 

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal 

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward 

Z = Fugitive Emissions 

Second Stack 

Inside Diameter: Height: 

Flow Volume ACFM: Velocity (m/sec): 

Distance to Nearest Property Line: 

Temperature °F: Moisture %: DEP ID Number? 

Stack Discharge Type: ________ 

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening 

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction 

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal 

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward 

Z = Fugitive Emissions 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 47 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS 

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________ 

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________ 

Incinerator Name: 

Description:

Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

Incinerator Capacity: Primary Burner Capacity: Secondary Burner Capacity: 

Incinerator Class: Waste Type (see back): DEP Permit No.: 

Exhaust Flow(ACFM): Exhaust Temp: Exhaust Moisture (%): 

Exhaust CO2 (%): Connected to FML(s)? 

Actual Emission Estimates (Tons/Yr) for Emission Fees and Emission Statements: 

Pollutant CAS Emission Amt (0.00 TPY) Calculation Method 

CO

Lead

NH3

NOX

PM10

PM2.5

SOX

VOC

Additional Pollutants (enter HAPs individually): 

NOTE: Most Criteria pollutants and HAPS need to be reported if greater than 0.5 TPY. The following pollutants need to be 

reported if greater than the amounts listed: 

Polychlorobiphenols (PCB) 0.01 TPY 

Mercury (Hg) 0.01 TPY 

Lead (Pb) 0.01 TPY 

Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 TPY 

Dioxins (Submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr 

Furans (Submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 48 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS (cont’d) 

Primary Material Incinerated _____________________________________________________ 

SCC, if known: ________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr: _________________________ 

SCHEDULE 1 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

SCHEDULE 2 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

Secondary Material Incinerated _____________________________________________________ 

SCC, if known: ________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr: _________________________ 

SCHEDULE 1 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

SCHEDULE 2 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 49 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS (cont’d) 

First Fuel Burned: ________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr: _________________________ 

SCC, if known: ________________ _____________________________________________________ 

FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft3: ____________ 

SCHEDULE 1 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

SCHEDULE 2 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

2nd Fuel Burned: ________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr: _________________________ 

SCC, if known: ________________ _____________________________________________________ 

FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft3: ____________ 

SCHEDULE 1 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

SCHEDULE 2 

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units): 

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________ 

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________ 

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________ 

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________ 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 50 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS (cont’d) 

First Control Device 

Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate 

(gal/min): 

DEP ID number? Is Material Collected/ 

Landfilled on Site? 

Pollutant Control Efficiencies 

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other) 

Second Control Device 

Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate 

(gal/min): 

DEP ID number? Is Material Collected/ 

Landfilled on Site? 

Pollutant Control Efficiencies 

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other) 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 51 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS (cont’d) 

First Stack 

Inside Diameter: Height: 

Flow Volume ACFM: Velocity (m/sec): 

Distance to Nearest Property Line: 

Temperature °F: Moisture %: DEP ID Number? 

Stack Discharge Type: ________ 

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening 

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction 

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal 

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward 

Z = Fugitive Emissions 

Second Stack 

Inside Diameter: Height: 

Flow Volume ACFM: Velocity (m/sec): 

Distance to Nearest Property Line: 

Temperature °F: Moisture %: DEP ID Number? 

Stack Discharge Type: ________ 

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening 

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction 

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal 

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward 

Z = Fugitive Emissions 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 52 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS (cont’d) 

INCINERATOR CLASS CODES 

Class I Portable packaged incinerators having a burning rate up to but not including 100 pounds per hour 

of Type 0 or Type 1 waste or 75 pounds per hour of Type 2 or Type 3 waste. 

Class II Flue fed single chamber incinerators capable of burning Type 0 or Type 1 waste at the rate of 100 

pounds or more per hour or Type 2 waste at the rate of 75 pounds or more per hour. New 

installations of these units are not acceptable to the Department. 

Class IIA Chute fed multi-chamber incinerators suitable for burning Type 0 and Type 1 waste at the rate of 

100 pounds or more per hour. 

Class III Direct fed incinerators suitable for burning Type 0 and Type 1 waste at the rate of 100 pounds or 

more per hour or Type 2 waste at the rate of 75 pounds or more per hour. 

Class IV Incinerators suitable for burning Type 3 waste at the rate of 75 pounds or more per hour. 

Class V Municipal incinerators suitable for burning a combination of wastes. 

Class VI Crematory and pathological incinerators suitable for burning Type 4 waste at the rate of 25 pounds 

or more per hour. 

Class VII Special incinerators designed to burn Type 5, Type 6, Type 7 or special wastes at the rate of 25 

pounds or more per hour. 

Class CA Controlled air incinerators designed to burn waste from institutional, commercial and industrial 

 operation. 

INCINERATOR WASTE TYPE CODES 

Trash: a mixture of highly combustible waste such as paper, cardboard cartons, wood boxes, and combustible floor 

sweepings from commercial and industrial activities containing up to 10% by-weight of plastic bags, coated paper, 

laminated paper, treated corrugated cardboard, oily rags and plastic or rubber scraps. 

Rubbish: a mixture of combustible waste such as paper, cardboard cartons, wood scrip, foliage and combustible floor 

sweepings from domestic, commercial, and industrial activities containing up to 20% by-weight of restaurant or cafeteria 

waste, but little or no treated papers, plastic or rubber wastes. 

Refuse: consisting of approximately an even mixture of rubbish and garbage by-weight. 

Garbage: consisting of animal and vegetable uses from cafeterias, hotels, hospitals, markets, and like installations. 

Remains: human and/or animal consisting of carcasses, organs and solid organic wastes from hospitals, laboratories, 

abattoirs, animal pounds and similar sub facilities. 

By-prod: gaseous, liquid, or semi-liquid, such as tar, paints, solvents, sludge, fumes, etc., from industrial operations. 

Solids: by-product waste such as rubber, plastics, wood waste, etc., from industrial operations. 

Sludge: the accumulated settled solids deposited from sewage. 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 53 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix F WORKSHEET FOR NEW CONTROL DEVICES 

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________ 

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________ 

First Control Device 

Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate 

(gal/min): 

DEP ID number? Is Material Collected/ 

Landfilled on Site? 

Pollutant Control Efficiencies 

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other) 

Second Control Device 

Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Installed: 

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate 

(gal/min): 

DEP ID number? Is Material Collected/ 

Landfilled on Site? 

Pollutant Control Efficiencies 

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other) 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 54 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix G WORKSHEET FOR NEW STACKS 

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________ 

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________ 

Stack 1 

Company Designation: Base Elevation (Ft): 

Inside Diameter: Height: 

Flow Volume ACFM: Velocity (m/sec): 

Temperature °F: Moisture %: DEP ID Number? 

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening 

Stack Discharge Type: ________ W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction 

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal 

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward 

Z = Fugitive Emissions 

Latitude* (to 0.0 seconds): Longitude* (to 0.0 seconds): 

Latitude (to 0.0 seconds): Longitude (to 0.0 seconds): 

Method: Horizontal Accuracy: Geometric Type:

Horizontal Reference Datum: Reference Point: 

Stack 2 

Company Designation: Base Elevation (Ft): 

Inside Diameter: Height: 

Flow Volume ACFM: Velocity (m/sec): 

Temperature °F: Moisture %: DEP ID Number? 

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening 

Stack Discharge Type: ________ W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction 

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal 

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward 

Z = Fugitive Emissions 

Latitude (to 0.0 seconds): Longitude (to 0.0 seconds): 

Method: Horizontal Accuracy: Geometric Type:

Horizontal Reference Datum: Reference Point: 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 55 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix H WORKSHEET FOR NEW FUEL MATERIAL LOCATIONS 

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________ 

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________ 

Please identify all locations that store fuel used by more than one air pollution sub facility or Control Device in the 

emissions year. The reason we are identifying fuel locations is to associate the characteristics of the fuel (%Sulfur, 

%Ash, Btu) once with the fuel location, instead of multiple times with each sub facility fed by the fuel location. Rules for 

creating fuel locations are: 

1. Create a fuel location only if it supplies fuel to more than one sub facility in an emissions year. If a sub facility is 

fed by its own fuel location, enter the fuel characteristics with its fuel record in your operations data. 

2. A fuel location can store only one type of fuel in an emissions year. 

3. If it changed the fuel stored during the year, create a separate fuel location for each of the fuels used. 

4. A sub facility can be fed a specific fuel from only one fuel location in a year. 

Fuel Material Location 1 

Company Name: Fuel Type: 

Storage Capacity: Date Installed: 

Sub Facilities Fed By This location 

Fuel Analyses for Reporting Year 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 56 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix H WORKSHEET FOR NEW FUEL MATERIAL LOCATIONS 

(cont’d) 

Fuel Material Location 2 

Company Name: Fuel Type: 

Storage Capacity: Date Installed: 

Sub Facilities Fed By This location 

Fuel Analyses for Reporting Year 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

Fuel Material Location 3 

Company Name: Fuel Type: 

Storage Capacity: Date Installed: 

Sub Facilities Fed By This location 

Fuel Analyses for Reporting Year 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

%ASH: %Sulfur: BTU: Units(lb-gal-cuft): Date Sampled: 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 57 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix I WORKSHEET FOR CHANGES TO EXISTING STACKS 

OR CONTROL DEVICES 

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________ 

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________ 

DEP ID of First Stack: ______________ 

Enter only changed characteristics 

Inside Diameter: Height: 

Flow Volume ACFM: Velocity (m/sec): 

Distance to Nearest Property Line: 

Temperature °F: Moisture %: 

Stack Discharge Type: ________ S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening 

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction 

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal 

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward 

Z = Fugitive Emissions 

Notes: 

DEP ID of Second Stack: ______________ 

Enter only changed characteristics 

Inside Diameter: Height: 

Flow Volume ACFM: Velocity (m/sec): 

Distance to Nearest Property Line: 

Temperature °F: Moisture %: 

Stack Discharge Type: ________ S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening 

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction 

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal 

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward 

Z = Fugitive Emissions 

Notes: 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 58 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

Appendix I WORKSHEET FOR CHANGES TO EXISTING STACKS OR 

CONTROL DEVICES (cont’d) 

DEP ID of First Control Device: _________________ 

Enter only changed characteristics 

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate 

(gal/min): 

Is Material Collected/ Landfilled on Site? 

Pollutant Control Efficiencies 

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other) 

Notes: 

DEP ID of Second Control Device: _________________ 

Enter only changed characteristics 

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate 

(gal/min): 

Is Material Collected Landfilled on Site? 

Pollutant Control Efficiencies 

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other) 

Notes: 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 59 - December 2005
2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions 

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - 60 - December 2005 

Appendix J CERTIFICATION OF DATA ACCURACY 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ACT 

CERTIFICATION OF DATA ACCURACY 

FOR COMPANIES SUBJECT TO EMISSION STATEMENT REGULATION 

Firm-Plant Code (federal tax ID + plant code assigned by DEP):

AFS Number (AIRS ID assigned by DEP):

Primary Facility ID (assigned by DEP):

Company Name: 

Plant Address: 

I, __________________________ _, certify under penalty of law as provided in 18 Pa. C.S. §4904 and 

Section 9(b)(2) of the Air Pollution Control Act, 35 P.S., §4009(b)(2) that I am a company officer or plant 

manager or authorized representative of the facility identified above, authorized to make this affidavit. I further 

certify that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information 

contained in this Emission Statement are true, accurate, and complete. 

Signature: 

Name: 

(Print or Type) 

Title: 

(Print or Type) 

Date: 
PECHAN

5528-B Hempstead Way

Springfield, VA 22151

703-813-6700 telephone

703-813-6729 facsimile

3622 Lyckan Parkway

Suite 2002

Durham, NC 27707

919-493-3144 telephone

919-493-3182 facsimile

P.O. Box 1575

Shingle Springs, CA 95682

530-672-0441 telephone

530-672-0504 facsimile

PENNSYLVANIA 2002

AREA SOURCE CRITERIA 

AIR POLLUTANT EMISSION 

ESTIMATION METHODS

Prepared for:

Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection

Bureau of Air Quality

P.O. Box 2357

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2357

Prepared by:

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.

3622 Lyckan Parkway

Suite 2002

Durham, NC 27707

Contract No. SP3580003990

Work Order 9

February 2004

Pechan Rpt. No. 04.02.006/9420.109
iii

CONTENTS

Page

AREA SOURCE DEFINITION ....................................................................................................................................1

METHODS FOR ESTIMATING AREA SOURCE ACTIVITY AND EMISSIONS ..................................................1

Control Efficiency (CE) ...........................................................................................................................................3

Rule Penetration (RP)...............................................................................................................................................3

Rule Effectiveness (RE) ...........................................................................................................................................3

Seasonal Emission Calculations...............................................................................................................................4

Point Source Subtractions ........................................................................................................................................5

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION – ANIMAL HUSBANDRY ................................................................................9

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION – CROPS (Fertilizer Application) (14 SCCs)......................................................9

ARCHITECTURAL SURFACE COATING (SCC 2401001000) ................................................................................9

ASPHALT PAVING (2 SCCs)....................................................................................................................................10

AUTOMOTIVE REFINISHING (SCC 2401005000).................................................................................................12

BAKERIES (SCC 2302050000)..................................................................................................................................13

BREWERIES (SCC 2302070001) ..............................................................................................................................14

COAL COMBUSTION (6 SCCs) ...............................................................................................................................16

COMMERCIAL AND CONSUMER SOLVENT USE (SCC 2465000000)..............................................................20

COMMERCIAL COOKING (5 SCCs) .......................................................................................................................21

COMPOSTING (3 SCCs)............................................................................................................................................22

DEGREASING (4 SCCs)............................................................................................................................................23

DRY CLEANERS (SCC 2420000370) .......................................................................................................................24

ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES (SCC 2401060000)....................................................................................................25

ELECTRICAL INSULATION (SCC 2401065000)....................................................................................................26

FACTORY FINISHED WOOD (SCC 2401015000)..................................................................................................27

FOREST FIRES (SCC 2810001000) ..........................................................................................................................27

FUEL OIL COMBUSTION (3 SCCs).........................................................................................................................28

GASOLINE MARKETING (5 SCCs).........................................................................................................................32

GRAPHIC ARTS (SCC 2425000000) ........................................................................................................................36

HIGH PERFORMANCE INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE SOLVENT (SCC 2401100000)...................................36

KEROSENE (2 SCCs).................................................................................................................................................37

LANDFILLS (SCC 2620030000) ...............................................................................................................................40

MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT (SCC 2401055000) ...........................................................................................41

MARINE COATING (SCC 2401080000) ..................................................................................................................42

METAL CANS (SCC 2401040000)............................................................................................................................42

METAL FURNITURE AND FIXTURES (SCC 2401025000)...................................................................................43

MISCELLANEOUS FINISHED METAL (SCC 2401050000) ..................................................................................44

MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING (SCC 2401090000) ................................................................................45

NATURAL GAS AND LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS (LPG) (4 SCCs)...............................................................45

OPEN BURNING (5 SCCs)........................................................................................................................................51

OTHER SPECIAL PURPOSE COATING (SCC 2401200000) .................................................................................54

OTHER TRANSPORTATION (SCC 2401085000)...................................................................................................55

PESTICIDE APPLICATION (SCC 2461800000)......................................................................................................56

PORTABLE GASOLINE CONTAINERS (SCC 2501060300)..................................................................................56

REFRIGERANT LOSSES (SCC 2399010000) ..........................................................................................................58

PUBLIC OWNED TREATMENT WORKS (3 SCCs)...............................................................................................59

RESIDENTIAL WOOD COMBUSTION (7 SCCs)...................................................................................................60

SOLID WASTE INCINERATION (2 SCCs)..............................................................................................................61

STRUCTURE FIRES (SCC 2810030000)..................................................................................................................64

TRAFFIC LINE PAINTING (SCC 2401008000).......................................................................................................65

WINERIES (SCC 2302070005)..................................................................................................................................66

WOOD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING (SCC 2401020000)..............................................................................67

APPENDIX A: REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................1
iv

[This page intentionally left blank.]
1

AREA SOURCE DEFINITION

For emission inventory development purposes, the term “area sources” traditionally refers to 

stationary air pollutant emission sources that are not inventoried at the facility-level. While point 

sources are inventoried individually, area sources are typically inventoried at the county level 

(Introduction to Area Source Emission Inventory Development Volume III: Chapter 1).1

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/cerr/index.html

 

Gasoline stations and dry cleaning establishments are often treated as both point and area 

sources. The main reason they are not exclusively treated as point sources is that the effort 

required to gather data and estimate emissions for each individual facility is very great, while 

emissions per facility are generally small. For these sources, a cut-off point, typically based on 

annual emissions, usually defines the distinction between point and area. The Consolidated 

Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) specifies reporting criteria air pollutant (CAP) thresholds for 

point and area sources, which vary depending on the pollutant and the attainment status of a 

county (see ).

Individual emissions sources are grouped with other like sources into source categories. These 

source categories are grouped in such a way that they can be estimated collectively using one 

methodology. Most area source categories do not have an analogue in the point source inventory. 

Pesticide use and commercial/consumer product use are such examples. The boundaries of the 

individual activities associated with these sources are often hard to determine or are, at best, 

arbitrary. Even within a point source facility, some activities occur that are more easily treated as 

area source emissions. Some emissions associated with surface coating operations such as 

equipment cleaning, for example, can be more practically estimated using area source methods 

even though other surface coating operations may be reported as part of the point source 

inventory.

METHODS FOR ESTIMATING AREA SOURCE ACTIVITY AND EMISSIONS

Area source emissions are generally estimated by multiplying an emission factor by some known 

indicator or collective activity for each area source category at the county level. Several 

methodologies are available for estimating area source activity levels and emissions. For this 

2002 area source inventory, estimates were derived by (1) treating area sources as point sources, 

(2) obtaining county-level activity data, (3) apportioning national or statewide activity data to 

counties, (4) use of per capita emission factors, and (5) use of per employee emission factors. 

Each approach has distinct advantages and disadvantages as discussed below.

Small sources that would normally be treated as area sources may be handled as point sources for 

several reasons. First, county level activity data may not be readily determinable for certain 

source categories. Municipal landfills provide an example of this situation.

For some source categories, county activity estimates were available. For example, monthly 

wine production data for 2002 were available by county from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control 
2

Board. If county activity data were not available, Commonwealth totals were apportioned to 

counties using data for a surrogate of the emissions activity. For example, the quantity of 

highway gasoline consumed in the Commonwealth was apportioned to the county level on the 

basis of vehicle miles traveled per county. Residential, commercial, and industrial fuel 

combustion were other categories that were handled in this manner. The major drawbacks of this 

approach are that additional data and resources are needed to apportion activity levels to the local 

level, and accuracy is lost in the process. If Commonwealth level data were not available, then 

national data were used in a similar manner.

Sources in certain area source categories were not only numerous and diffuse, but were too 

difficult to inventory by any of the above procedures. As an example, solvent evaporation from 

consumer and commercial products such as waxes, aerosol products and window cleaners cannot 

be routinely determined by DEP. In addition, it would be resource-intensive to develop and 

implement a survey that would yield such information. Per capita or per employee emission 

factors are used to estimate emissions for these source categories. The use of per capita emission 

factors is based on the assumption that, for a given source category, emission activity can be 

reasonably associated with population. This assumption is valid over broad areas for certain 

categories such as Architectural Surface Coating and solvent evaporation from Consumer and 

Commercial Products.

For categories that rely on a per capita emission factor, county population estimates for 2002 

were obtained from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. When emissions are calculated from per 

employee emission factors, county-level employment data for 2002 were estimated from a 

combination of two sources. Because county employment data for 2002 will not be available 

from the Bureau of the Census’ County Business Patterns (CBP) until April 2004, 2001 data for 

the appropriate North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes were obtained 

from the 2001 CBP2 and projected to 2002 using the Commonwealth-level 2001 to 2002 

employment change for the appropriate NAICS codes. The Commonwealth-level employment 

data were obtained at the NAICS code level from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.3

In some cases, the Census does not report the number of employees in the separate counties 

within the Commonwealth for each category wereemployment value for a particular NAICS 

code/county combination because available ,but ,of confidentiality concerns. In these cases, the 

Census provides employment data as a range (e.g., between 20 and 99 employees), the. When a 

precise number of employees was not available from CBP, an initial estimate was developed 

based on the mid-point of the reported range (e.g., 60 employees was used for the 20 to 99 

employment range). For a given NAICS code, the mid-point estimates were then adjusted up or 

down to yield the Commonwealth-level employment for that NAICS code as reported in the 

CBP. The adjustments were computed by first calculating the difference between the 

Commonwealth-level CBP employment and the total of the employment values for counties for 

which actual employment values were reported in the CBP. The resulting value represents 

employment for the counties for which the CBP reports an employment range value. This value 

was then divided by the sum of the mid-point employment estimates for the counties for which 

employment was reported as a range. The resulting ratio was multiplied by the mid-point 
3

estimates to yield the final county employment estimates. The calculation spreadsheets provide 

each of the steps used in this estimation procedure.

Control Efficiency (CE)

Control efficiency is the emission reduction percentage associated with a control device, process 

change or reformulation. Control efficiencies can vary widely by source within an area source 

category. Area source control efficiency values represent the weighted average control for the 

category.

Rule Penetration (RP)

Because lower-emitting sources within a source category may not be covered by a regulation, it is 

important to reflect the extent to which total source category emissions are affected. Rule 

penetration represents the percentage of total source category emissions that are affected by a 

regulation.

Rule Effectiveness (RE)

Rule effectiveness is a factor used to adjust the control efficiency to account for failures and 

uncertainties that affect the actual performance of the control. For example, control equipment 

performance may be adversely affected by age of the equipment, lack of maintenance, or 

improper use. With the exception of Federal regulations, a default RE value of 80 percent was 

applied when information was not available to substantiate the true RE value.1 An RE of 100 

percent was applied to all Federal regulations that require national compliance.

The RE factor is applied to the estimated control efficiency in the calculation of emissions from a 

source. The formula for the application of CE, RP, and RE is displayed below:

Uncontrolled Emissions = 50 pounds per day

Control Efficiency = 90 percent

Rule Penetration = 60 percent

Rule Effectiveness = 80 percent

Controlled Emissions = Uncontrolled Emissions × (1 – CE/100 × RP/100 × RE/100)

Controlled Emissions = 50 × (1 – 0.9 × 0.6 × 0.8) = 50 × (1 – 0.432) = 28.4 pounds per day

An RE and/or RP value can substantially increase emission estimates when high control 

efficiencies are involved. For example, if RP was not applied in the above example (equivalent 

to a 100 percent RP assumption), then estimated emissions are:

Controlled Emissions = 50 × (1 – 0.9 × 0.8) = 50 × (1 – 0.72) = 14 pounds per day.
4

Seasonal Emission Calculations

Area source emissions are typically prepared first on an annual basis because activity data are 

generally only available on an annual basis. The recently promulgated Consolidated Emissions 

Reporting Rule (CERR) requires States to submit county-level area source CAP emission 

inventories to EPA for three temporal periods: annual, summer season work weekday, and 

winter season work weekday (the latter for carbon monoxide and particulate matter emissions 

only). Summer season work weekday emission inventories are needed to support planning for 

ozone NAAQS attainment. The summer season refers to the peak ozone season months of June, 

July, and August. Winter season work weekday emission inventories are used to support carbon 

monoxide (CO) NAAQS attainment planning. The winter season refers to January, February, 

and December of the same year (e.g., 2002).

Seasonal emission estimates are calculated by adjusting the annual inventory to reflect activity 

during the summer and winter season. Summer work weekday and winter work weekday 

emissions are calculated by multiplying annual emissions by the appropriate allocation factor. 

For most source categories, summer and winter work weekday allocation factors were developed 

from default monthly and weekly profiles available from EPA’s Emissions Modeling 

ClearingHouse (EMCH).4 

The EMCH provides 807 different monthly profiles and 45 different weekly profiles. The first 

step in developing summer allocation factors was to compute summer monthly ratios by dividing 

the sum of the June, July, and August monthly profile values by the total of the twelve monthly 

profile values. Winter monthly ratios were calculated in a similar manner, except monthly 

profile values for January, February, and December were incorporated into the calculation. 

Weekday profile values were computed by dividing the sum of the Monday through Friday 

weekly profile values by the total profile value for the entire week.

Summer work weekday allocation factors were calculated by multiplying the summer monthly 

ratios by the appropriate weekday ratio and then dividing the result by 65 (the number of work 

weekdays in the summer of 2002). In a like manner, winter work weekday allocation factors 

were computed by multiplying winter monthly ratios by the appropriate weekday ratio and 

dividing by 65 (the number of work weekdays in the winter of 2002).

These allocation factors were then matched to area source classification codes (SCCs) via a 

crosswalk between SCCs and temporal profiles available from EPA’s EMCH. Annual emissions 

for each SCC/county/pollutant combination were then multiplied by the appropriate summer 

work weekday allocation factor to yield summer work weekday emissions. Winter work 

weekday emissions were calculated for categories emitting CO and/or PM. Similar to the 

summer calculations, annual CO and PM emissions were multiplied by the appropriate winter 

work weekday allocation factor to yield winter work weekday emissions.

For source categories for which actual monthly/seasonal activity data were available (e.g., 

Residential Natural Gas Combustion, Structure Fires, and Wineries), summer and winter season 

allocation factors were calculated from the available activity data. The following presents 
5

sample calculations performed to develop the summer work weekday allocation factor for 

Bakeries. The individual source category methodology sections present the calculations 

performed to compute each category’s seasonal emission estimates.

SAMPLE CALCULATION OF SUMMER SEASON WORK WEEKDAY ALLOCATION FACTOR:

Bakeries (SCC 2302050000)

0.25

996

83 83 83

Total of Monthly Profile Values

(June Profile Value July Profile Value August Profile Value)

= + + =

+ + Summer Season Ratio =

0.715

1000

143 143 143 143 143 = + + + + =

= Sum of Weekly Values

Sum of Monday through Friday Profile Values Weekday Ratio

Summer Work Weekday Allocation Factor = 0.25 × 0.715 ÷ 65 = 0.00275

For source categories for which actual seasonal emissions activity data were available (e.g., 

Residential Natural Gas Combustion, Structure Fires, and Wineries), the summer and winter 

season allocation factors were developed from these activity data.

Point Source Subtractions

Source categories can appear in both the area source and point source inventory. For example, 

emissions from large dry cleaning establishments may be included in the point source inventory, 

while emissions from smaller dry cleaners (below some specified cutoff) are included in the area 

source inventory. When a point source inventory and an area source inventory include emissions 

from the same process, the area source emission estimates are adjusted to avoid double-counting. 

Although many area source categories (e.g., Architectural Surface Coating) do not have 

companion point source categories, there are many source categories in the area source inventory 

for which emissions are reported in the Pennsylvania point source inventory (see Table 1). For 

these source categories, point source emissions are subtracted from total emission estimates to 

yield area source emissions. Ideally, this adjustment would occur in the area source emission 

calculation by subtracting point source emission activity (throughput) from total emission 

activity as shown below.

Area Source Activity = (Total Activity)− (Point Source Activity)
6

However, the Pennsylvania point source inventory does not report throughput for most sources. 

Therefore, it was necessary to calculate the point source subtractions using total and point source 

emission estimates as identified below.

Area Emissionsp = (Total Emissionsp)− (Point Source Emissionsp)

where:

p = pollutant

Separate point source inventories were developed for Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and 

for all other counties. Except for ammonia and lead, the Allegheny inventory reports annual

emissions for all pollutants included in the area source inventory. These pollutants are also 

missing from the Philadelphia County annual inventory. Unlike the Allegheny inventory, the 

Philadelphia County inventory does not report PM emissions on a filterable and condensable 

basis, but rather on a primary basis. The inventory for the remaining counties reports annual 

emissions for the same pollutants as the Philadelphia County inventory, with the exception of 

primary PM2.5 (PM25-PRI), which is not reported for the remaining counties. Given the different 

ways in which PM emissions are reported in the 2002 Pennsylvania point source inventory, it 

was necessary to develop PM emissions on a consistent basis to facilitate the point source 

subtractions. Therefore, for Allegheny County, Pechan summed the condensable and the 

filterable PM emissions to obtain PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emission values for use in the point 

source subtractions.

Although the point source inventories also report winter and summer day emissions, these 

estimates were not used in the point source subtractions. The annual emission estimates were 

used in the subtractions because it is not clear if every point source facility that would have 

emissions during the summer/winter have these emissions reported in the inventory. For 

example, there are only 14 records with winter day NOx emissions in the point source inventory, 

while there are over 4,000 records with annual NOx emissions reported in the inventory.

To facilitate the point source subtractions, the annual emission records for all point SCCs 

associated with an area source category were summed to the county level. Because PA DEP 

indicated that point source subtractions should be applied to the Machinery and Equipment 

Solvent Coating area source category by subtracting point source emission records associated 

with the combination of point SCCs 40202501, 40202502, and 40202599 and SIC code 3531, it 

was also necessary to compile county level annual emissions for these records. In addition, 

because these point SCCs are also associated with the Miscellaneous Finished Metals Surface 

Coating area source category, it was necessary to compile county-level annual emissions for all 

point source records with these SCCs that are not associated with SIC code 3531.

The county-level point source annual emissions were then subtracted from the area source 

category annual emissions using an area source category-to-point source category crosswalk 

developed for this project. Note that in keeping with EIIP guidance, when the resulting area 

source emission estimate was negative, the area source emission value was set to zero. In 

addition, when the PM10-PRI emission estimate resulted in a zero value, then the companion 
7

PM25-PRI emission estimate was set to zero for consistency. In addition to setting PM25-PRI 

emissions to zero when PM10-PRI emissions were zero, we also set PM25-PRI emissions to 

PM10-PRI emissions when PM25-PRI emissions were greater than PM10-PRI emissions, after 

the point source subtractions were performed. Finally, the summer and winter season work 

weekday emission estimates were updated by multiplying the revised annual emission estimate 

by the appropriate winter season and/or summer season work weekday allocation factors. The 

following presents sample point source NOx emission subtraction calculations for the 

Commercial/Institutional Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal Combustion category (SCC 

2103002000).

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

tons

Area Source NOx Emissions for SCC tons tons

Po Source NOx Emissions AlleghenyCnty . tons (SCC ) . tons (SCC )

Total NOx Emissions for SCC AlleghenyCnty tons per year

Area Source NOx Emissions for SCC Total NOx Emissions Po NOx Emissions

895.9997

2103002000 1,054.3025 158.3028

int ( ) 152 0751 10300207 6 2277 10300208

2103002000 ( ) 1,054.3025

2103002000 int

=

= −

= +

=

= −

The following individual sections describe the annual and seasonal emission estimation 

methodology for each area source category. Each section contains a brief description of the 

source category, identifies whether the category’s emission estimates were subject to point source 

emission subtractions, and presents sample emission calculations (point source subtractions are 

not included in these sample calculations). All referenced sources are displayed in Appendix A.
8

Table 1. Area Source Inventory Categories with Point Source Emission Subtractions

SCC SCC1DESC SCC3DESC SCC6DESC SCC8DESC

2102001000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Industrial Anthracite Coal Total: All Boiler Types

2102002000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Industrial Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal Total: All Boiler Types

2103001000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Anthracite Coal Total: All Boiler Types

2103002000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal Total: All Boiler Types

2103004000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Distillate Oil Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2103005000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Residual Oil Total: All Boiler Types

2103006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Natural Gas Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2103007000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Total: All Combustor Types

2302050000 Industrial Processes Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20 Bakery Products Total

2302070001 Industrial Processes Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20 Fermentation/Beverages Breweries

2401015000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Factory Finished Wood: SIC 2426 thru 242 Total: All Solvent Types

2401020000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Wood Furniture: SIC 25 Total: All Solvent Types

2401025000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Metal Furniture: SIC 25 Total: All Solvent Types

2401040000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Metal Cans: SIC 341 Total: All Solvent Types

2401050000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating

Miscellaneous Finished Metals: SIC 34 - (341 + 

3498) Total: All Solvent Types

2401055000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Machinery and Equipment: SIC 35 Total: All Solvent Types

2401060000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Large Appliances: SIC 363 Total: All Solvent Types

2401070000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Motor Vehicles: SIC 371 Total: All Solvent Types

2401080000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Marine: SIC 373 Total: All Solvent Types

2401085000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Railroad: SIC 374 Total: All Solvent Types

2401090000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Miscellaneous Manufacturing Total: All Solvent Types

2415200000 Solvent Utilization Degreasing All Industries: Conveyerized Degreasing Total: All Solvent Types

2415300000 Solvent Utilization Degreasing All Industries: Cold Cleaning Total: All Solvent Types

2420000370 Solvent Utilization Dry Cleaning All Processes Special Naphthas

2425000000 Solvent Utilization Graphic Arts All Processes Total: All Solvent Types

2501060053 Storage and Transport

Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage Gasoline Service Stations Stage 1: Balanced Submerged Filling

2501060101 Storage and Transport

Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage Gasoline Service Stations Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled

2501060102 Storage and Transport

Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage Gasoline Service Stations Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled

2601010000

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery On-site Incineration Industrial Total

2601020000

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery On-site Incineration Commercial/Institutional Total

2620030000

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery Landfills Municipal Total

2630020010

Waste Disposal, Treatment, and 

Recovery Landfills Wastewater Treatment Processes Total
9

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION – ANIMAL HUSBANDRY

Emissions from livestock production come from such activities as confinement, manure handling 

and storage, and land application of manure. Biogenic emission source calculations were derived 

from EPA’s BEIS inventory system.

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION – CROPS (Fertilizer Application) (14 SCCs)

(Anhydrous Ammonia SCC 2801700001, Aqueous Ammonia SCC 2801700002, Nitrogen 

Solutions SCC 2801700003, Urea SCC 2801700004, Ammonium Nitrate SCC 2801700005, 

Ammonium Sulfate SCC 2801700006, Ammonium Thiosulfate SCC 2801700007, N-P-K 

(multi-grade nutrient fertilizers) SCC 2801700010, Calcium Ammonium Nitrate SCC 

2801700011, Potassium Nitrate SCC 2801700012, Diammonium Phosphate SCC 2801700013, 

Monoammonium Phosphate SCC 2801700014, Liquid Ammonium Polyphosphate SCC 

2801700015, Misc. Fertilizers SCC 2801700099)

Emissions from crops are primarily due to spreading of various fertilizers. Fertilizers spread on 

fields that contribute to ammonia emissions include anhydrous ammonia, aqueous ammonia, 

nitrogen solutions, urea, ammonium nitrate, calcium ammonia, and ammonium sulfate. Biogenic 

emission source calculations were derived from EPA’s BEIS inventory system.

ARCHITECTURAL SURFACE COATING (SCC 2401001000)

Architectural surface coatings are used by homeowners and painting contractors to coat the 

interior and exterior of buildings and other structures. The coatings are applied by spray, brush, 

or roller and dry or cure at ambient conditions. The VOC emissions from this source category 

result from the evaporation of the paint and cleanup solvents. Each county’s emissions are 

calculated using a per capita emission factor and U.S. Bureau of the Census 2002 population 

data. The Federal architectural surface coating regulations call for a 20 percent reduction in the 

solvent content of architectural surface coatings manufactured after September 1999.5 Therefore, 

a 20 percent CE is applied in the 2002 inventory.

The emission factor that is used in this effort differs from that used for the 1999 area source 

inventory. The new per capita emission factor was calculated using the Emission Inventory 

Improvement Program (EIIP) methods for this category. National solvent- and water-based 

coating per capita use factors were first calculated from 2002 national paint shipments6 and 2002 

national population data.7 These factors were then combined with information on the average 

volatile organic compound (VOC) content of these coatings to calculate per capita emission 

factors as follows: 

Water-Based = 0.74 pounds VOC/gallon8 6 × 589,527,000 gallons /288,368,698 people7

= 1.5128 pounds VOC/person/year

Solvent-Based = 3.87 pounds VOC/gallon8 × 119,914,000 gallons6 /288,368,698 people7

= 1.6093 pounds VOC/person/year 
10

Final composite emission factor = 1.5128 + 1.6093 = 3.1221 pounds VOC/person/year

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS: 

( )( ) 



 



 = − ⋅ ⋅ 100 100 100

1 CE RP RE Annual VOC Emissions EmissionFactor Population

where:

Emission Factor = 3.1221 lbs VOC/person/year

Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County)7

CE (Control Efficiency) = 20%5

RP (Rule Penetration) = 100%

RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 100%

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds per year

people

year

person

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

1585.9069

2000

1 3,171,813.823

100

100

100

100

100

20 1,269,904 1

3.1221

=













 = ⋅





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 



















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00356 9

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 1585.9069 × 0.00356 = 5.6484 tons VOC per day

ASPHALT PAVING (2 SCCs)

There are two types of asphalt used for road paving and repair: cutback asphalt and emulsified 

asphalt. VOC emissions result primarily from the curing of the applied material. The following 

sections describe the two types of asphalt and identify the methods used to estimate emissions for 

each type.

Cutback Asphalt (SCC 2461021000)

Cutback asphalt is used as a pavement sealant, a tack coat, and a bonding agent between layers of 

paving material. Cutback asphalt is prepared by blending or “cutting back” asphalt cement with 

various blends of petroleum distillates. Emissions from cutback asphalt paving occur during the 

curing of the road surface when petroleum distillates evaporate.

Annual VOC emissions from cutback asphalt paving were computed from information obtained 

from the Pennsylvania Association of Asphalt Material Applicators (PAMA) on the amount of 
11

cutback asphalt applied in 2002 and the VOC content and density of the asphalt.10 In addition, it 

was assumed that 100 percent of cutback asphalt contained diluent and that 70 percent of the 

diluent evaporates.11 County emissions were estimated by multiplying State emissions by the ratio 

of the each county’s bituminous paved lane mileage by the State’s bituminous paved lane 

mileage.12 Based on the State regulation prohibiting use of cutback asphalt during summer 

months, there are no summer season work weekday emissions estimated for cutback asphalt.13

Emulsified Asphalt (SCC 2461022000)

Emulsified asphalt is a type of liquefied road surfacing material that is used in some of the same 

applications as cutback asphalt. However, instead of blending asphalt cement with petroleum 

distillates, emulsified asphalt uses a blend of water with an emulsifier.

Annual VOC emissions from emulsified asphalt paving were computed from information obtained 

from the Pennsylvania Association of Asphalt Material Applicators on the amount of emulsified 

asphalt applied in 2002, the VOC content and density of the asphalt, and the percentage of 

emulsified asphalt containing diluent.10 In addition, it was assumed that 100 percent of the 

emulsified asphalt diluent evaporates.11 County emissions were estimated by multiplying State 

emissions by the ratio of the each county’s bituminous paved lane mileage by the State’s 

bituminous paved lane mileage.14 Annual emissions were allocated to the summer season work 

weekday based on information from PAMA that emulsified asphalt is only applied from March 1 

through October 31.15 In addition, it was assumed that asphalt use is evenly distributed during 

this period and that paving is only performed on weekdays.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

( )( )

( )( )( )

State Bituminous Paved Lane Miles

County Bituminous Paved Lane Miles County Annual VOCEmissions Statewide VOC emissions x

Statewide Annual Emissions Emission Factor State Asphalt Use of Diluent Evaporating

Emission Factor VOC Content VOC Density

=

=

=

2002 %

where:

Cutback Asphalt VOC Content = 35%10

Emulsified Asphalt VOC Content = 8%10

Cutback Asphalt VOC Density = 7.1 lbs/gallon10

Emulsified Asphalt VOC Density = 6.25 lbs/gallon10

2002 PA Cutback Asphalt Use = 5,000,000 gallons10

2002 PA Emulsified Asphalt Use = 15,000,000 gallons10

Bituminous Paved County Lane Miles = 2,538 miles (Allegheny)14

Bituminous Paved State Lane Miles = 83,227 miles14

% of Cutback Asphalt Diluent that Evaporates = 70%11

% of Emulsified Asphalt Containing Diluent = 50%10

% of Emulsified Asphalt Diluent that Evaporates = 100%11
12

Cutback Asphalt VOC Emissions Calculation:

Annual VOC Emissions tons VOC per year

miles

miles million gallons cutback asphalt

year

gallon

tons VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

tons VOC per gallon per year lbs

ton

year

gallon

lbs VOC

Emission Factor

132.6147

83,227

2,538 5 0.7

0.0012425

0.0012425

2000

1

7.1

0.35

=

= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅

= ⋅ ⋅ =

(Summer work weekday emissions are estimated as zero due to State prohibition on use during this 

period)13

Emulsified Asphalt VOC Emissions Calculation:

Annual VOC Emissions tons VOC per year

miles

miles million gallons emulsified asphalt

year

gallon

tons VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

tons VOC per gallon per year lbs

ton

year

gallon

lbs VOC

Emission Factor

57.1780

83,227

2,538 15 0.5

0.00025

0.00025

2000

1

6.25

0.08

=

= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅

= ⋅ ⋅ =

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 3/8 (fraction of paving performed in the summer months) × 5/7 

(fraction of paving performed on weekdays) ÷ 65 (number of weekdays in the summer) = 0.00412515

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 57.1780 × 0.004125 = 0.2359 tons VOC per day

AUTOMOTIVE REFINISHING (SCC 2401005000)

Automotive refinishing is the painting of worn or damaged automobiles, light trucks, and other 

vehicles. The coating of new cars, however, is considered in the point source inventory, and 

therefore not included in this inventory. The automotive refinishing VOC emission factor of 

2.30 lb/person is based on EPA guidance.16 A control efficiency of 60.94 percent for 2002 was 

computed by applying an incremental reduction of 38 percent17 to 1999’s 37 percent18 control 

efficiency based on the following calculation:

Control Efficiency Control Efficiency

Incremental Control Efficiency Control Efficiency Control Efficiency

100 60.94%

100

37 1

100

38 2002 1 1

100

100

1999 1

100

2002 2002 1 1

⋅ = 





 





 



 





 − 

 



 = − −

⋅ 













 



 





 − 

 



 = − −

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:
13

( )( ) 



 



 = − ⋅ ⋅ 100 100 100

1 CE RP RE AnnualVOC Emissions Emission Factor Population 

where:

Emission Factor =2.30 lbs VOC/person/year16

Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County)7

Control Efficiency = 60.94%17 18

Rule Penetration = 100%

Rule Effectiveness = 100%

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds per year

people

year

person

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

570.4282

2000

1 1,140,856

100

100

100

100

100

60.94 1,269,904 1

2.30

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 



















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00385 9

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 570.4282 × 0.00385 = 2.1940 tons VOC per day

BAKERIES (SCC 2302050000)

Bakery emissions, primarily ethanol, result from yeast fermentation during the baking process of 

bread and bakery products. Ethanol is emitted through a vent with any combustion product gases. 

Relevant NAICS codes for bakeries are 311811 and 311812.

County-level VOC emissions were calculated using an employment-based emission factor and 

the number of NAICS code 311811 and 311812 employees in each county. The number of 

employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns2 and grown to 

2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth 

employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).3

 The Bakeries emission factor is 

0.11 tons VOC/employee/year.

19 Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from 

these emission estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Employees)

where: 

Emission Factor = 0.11 tons VOC /employee/year19

Employees = 1024 2 3 (Allegheny County)
14

(1024 )

0.11

employees

year

employee

tons VOC

Annual VOC Emissions





















= = 112.64 tons VOC per year

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor=0.002754

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 112.64×0.00275 = 0.3098 tons VOC per day

BREWERIES (SCC 2302070001)

Emissions of VOCs from breweries result from compounds such as ethanol, myrcene, ethyl 

acetate and higher alcohols resulting from the brewing process. There are two brewery emission 

factors, which differ based on facility production size (i.e., a smaller emission factor is used for 

facilities with more than 60,000 barrels production, and a larger factor for facilities producing 

60,000 barrels or less).

Because facility-level brewery production data were not available, it was necessary to estimate 

the amount of production in each county associated with small and large facilities. First, countylevel beer production was estimated by apportioning State-level production to counties based on 

county-level brewery employment. Total Pennsylvania beer production was obtained from the 

Federal Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.20

2

 The number of brewery (NAICS code 

31212) employees in 2002 was estimated by projecting 2001 county employment, obtained from 

the 2001 County Business Patterns, to 2002 based on the 2002 to 2001 State-level brewery 

employment ratio, obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.3

Based on the average Pennsylvania brewery production per employee (2,122 barrels) calculated 

from the data described above, it was assumed that all facilities in a county reporting fewer than 

29 employees would contain only small breweries. The cutoff of 29 employees was chosen 

based on the observation that, assuming a constant per employee production rate, a brewery with 

29 employees would produce approximately 61,500 barrels of beer. It was also assumed that a 

county with more than 29 brewery employees would have production by both small and large 

facilities. In lieu of actual data, it was assumed that 1 percent of these counties’ production is 

from small breweries, and 99 percent is from large breweries. Therefore, the small brewery 

emission factor was applied to 1 percent of the county’s beer production, while the large brewery 

emission factor was applied to 99 percent of the county’s production. This 1 percent assumption 

appears reasonable given that this value results in statewide brewery emissions similar to those 

estimated for 1996.

Since Pennsylvania’s brewery production data were available on a monthly basis, the statewide 

summer month allocation factor was calculated using the ratio of summer beer production to the 

annual beer production. This was then converted to the summer work weekday allocation factor 

using weekday temporal allocation data from EPA’s Emissions Modeling Clearinghouse 

(EMCH).4 20
15

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

( )( ) 













 = State Employees

County Employees Annual VOC Emissions EmissionFactor Statewide Production

where: 

Small Brewery Emission Factor = 56.743 pounds of VOC/1000 barrels21

Large Brewery Emission Factor = 4.16791 pounds of VOC/1000 barrels22

Adams County Employees = 72 3

Allegheny County Employees = 2612 3

2002 PA Beer Production = 3,089,646 barrels20

Adams County (Small Breweries Only Assumption) Annual VOC Emissions:

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions lbs VOC per year

State Employees

County Employees barrels

barrels

lbs VOC Annual VOC Emissions

0.4214

2000

1 842.8634

1,456

7 3,089,646

1000

56.743

= ⋅ =

= ⋅ ⋅

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month beer production/annual beer production ×

weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 856,549/3,089,646 × 0.715/65 = 0.003054 20

Summer work weekday allocation factor=0.00305

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.4214 × 0.00305 = 0.001285 tons VOC per day

Allegheny County (Small and Large Breweries Assumption) Annual VOC Emissions:

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions lbs VOC per year

State Employees

County Employees barrels

barrels

lbs VOC

State Employees

County Employees barrels

barrels

lbs VOC Annual VOC Emissions

1.2998

2000

1 2599.5583

1,456

261 3,089,646

1000

4.168 0.99

1,456

261 3,089,646

1000

56.743 0.01

= ⋅ =

















⋅ ⋅ ⋅

+













 = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month beer production/annual beer production ×

weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 856,549/3,089,646 × 0.715/65 = 0.003054 20

Summer work weekday allocation factor=0.00305

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 1.2998 × 0.00305 = 0.00396 tons VOC per day
16

COAL COMBUSTION (6 SCCs)

(Residential Anthracite SCC 2104001000, Residential Bituminous SCC 2104002000, 

Commercial/Institutional Anthracite SCC 2103001000, Commercial/Institutional Bituminous 

SCC 2103002000, Industrial Anthracite SCC 2102001000, Industrial Bituminous SCC 

2102002000)

This category covers emissions from the burning of coal by residential, and small commercial and 

industrial users. Coal combustion emissions were estimated for VOC, NOx, CO, Pb, PM, and 

SO2.

Residential coal consumption, in tons per dwelling unit, was estimated using the following 

equation:

Coal consumption per dwelling unit = 0.003874 e(7.6414-(1000/heating degree days))

Heating Degree Day (HDD) data were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration.23

After estimating county-level residential coal consumption per unit, emissions were calculated by 

multiplying these values by the number of coal-burning dwelling units in each county

 The HDD of each county was assigned according to the town or city in the 

county or the nearest town or city of similar latitude for which data were available.

24 and the 

emission factor for each pollutant.

Year 2002 Commonwealth-level commercial sector coal consumption (computed from the 

Energy Information Administration’s State Energy Data 200025 and Annual Coal Report 200226

2

) 

was allocated to individual counties using the number of commercial sector facilities in each 

county. County-level emissions were then calculated by multiplying county coal consumption 

by the emission factor for the applicable CAP.

Industrial coal-burning emissions were computed in a similar way to commercial/institutional 

emissions. However, county-level industrial employment data (from County Business Patterns 

and Current Employment Statistics) were used to allocate coal consumption to individual 

counties.

In some cases, CAP emission factors differ between anthracite and bituminous coal. Because 

anthracite is mined in the eastern half of the Commonwealth, while bituminous is mined in the 

western half, the emission calculations assume that eastern counties burn anthracite coal while 

western counties burn bituminous coal.

For Commercial and Industrial sector categories, point source emissions, where present, were 

subtracted from these initial emission estimates.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
17

Residential Coal Combustion:

( )( )

( ) ( ) 



 





= ⋅

−

Coal - Burning Dwelling Units Burning Dwelling Units e Number of Coal -

Annual Emissions Pollutant Emission Factor Percent AshContent if applicable

HDD 0.003874

,

1000 7.6414

where: 

VOC Emission Factor = 10 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year27

39

; 10 lbs/ton 

bituminous coal/year

NOx Emission Factor = 3 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year27; 9.1 lbs/ton bituminous 

coal/year39

CO Emission Factor = 275 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year27; 275 lbs/ton 

bituminous coal/year39

Pb Emission Factor = 0.013182 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year39

PM10-FIL Emission Factor = 10 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year27; 6.2 lbs/ton 

bituminous coal/year39

PM25-FIL Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year27× 13.38% ash 

content =8.028 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 3.8 lbs/ton bituminous 

coal/year39

PM-CON Emission Factor = 0.08 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year27× 13.38% ash 

content =1.0704 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 1.04 lbs/ton bituminous 

coal/year39

SO2 Emission Factor = 39 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year

27× 0.89% sulfur content 

=34.71 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 31 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year39×

2.42% sulfur content = 75.02 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year

Anthracite Coal Sulfur Content = 0.89% sulfur27

Bituminous Coal Sulfur Content = 2.42% sulfur27

Anthracite Coal Ash Content = 13.38% ash27

Number of Coal-Burning Dwelling Units (Allegheny County) = 18324

e = natural base

HDD = Heating Degree Days (Allegheny County) = 5,49423

VOC Emissions:

( )

( )

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

dwelling unit

e tons coal dwelling units

year

ton coal

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

6.1539

2000

1 12,307.7791

0.003874 183

10 5494

1000 7.6414

= ⋅ =









































=

−

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.000110 4 23

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 6.1539 × 0.000110 = 0.000675 tons VOC per day
18

CO Emissions:

( ) ( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

dwelling unit

tons coal e dwelling units

year

tons coal

lbs CO

Annual CO Emissions

169.2320

2000

1 338,463.9245

0.003874 183

275 5494

1000 7.6414

= ⋅ =





































=

−

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0001104 23

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 169.2320 × 0.000110 = 0.01856 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor=0.005554 23

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 169.2320 × 0.00555 = 0.9389 tons CO per day

Commercial/Institutional Coal Combustion:

( )( ) 













 = Number of State Facilities

Number of County Facilities Annual Emissions Pollutant Emission Factor CoalConsumption

where: 

VOC Emission Factor = 0.07 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year28

39

; 1.3 lbs/ton 

bituminous coal/year

NOx Emission Factor = 18 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year39; 33 lbs/ton bituminous 

coal/year39

CO Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year39; 11 lbs/ton bituminous 

coal/year39

Pb Emission Factor = 0.0089 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year39; 0.013182 lbs/ton 

bituminous coal/year39

SO2 Emission Factor =39 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year39× 0.89% sulfur content 

= 34.71 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 38 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year39 ×

2.42% sulfur content = 91.96 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 

PM10-FIL Emission Factor = 2.3 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year39 × 13.38% ash 

content = 30.774 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 13.2 lbs/ton bituminous 

coal/year39

PM25-FIL Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year39 × 13.38% ash 

content = 8.028 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 4.6 lbs/ton bituminous 

coal/year39

PM-CON Emission Factor = 0.08 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year39 × 13.38% ash 

content = 1.0704 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 1.04 lbs/ton bituminous 

coal/year39
19

Anthracite Coal Sulfur Content = 0.89%27

Bituminous Coal Sulfur Content = 2.42%27

Anthracite Coal Ash Content = 13.38% ash27

Pennsylvania Coal Consumption = 512,636 tons25 26

Number of County Facilities (Allegheny County) = 24,6542

Number of Pennsylvania Facilities = 197,7952

Commercial/Institutional Coal Consumption: 25 26

tons

tons

tons

tons

State Coal Consumption Commercial Consumption

512,636

742,000

587,000 648,000

2000 Commercialand ResidentialConsumption

2002 Commercialand ResidentialConsumption 2000

= ⋅ =

= ⋅

VOC Emissions:

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

state facilities

county facilities tons

year

ton bituminous coal

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

41.5331

2000

1 83,066.2561

197,795

24,654 512,636

1.3

= ⋅ =

= ⋅ ⋅

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.001704

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 41.5331 × 0.00170 = 0.0705 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:

tons COper year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions poundsCO per year

state facilities

county facilities tons

year

ton bituminous coal

lbs CO

Annual CO Emissions

351.4342

2000

1 702,868.321

197,795

24,654 512,636

11

= ⋅ =

= ⋅ ⋅

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.001704

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 351.4342 × 0.00170 = 0.5967 tons CO per day 

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.003974

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 351.4342 × 0.00397 = 1.3962 tons CO per day

Industrial Coal Combustion:
20

( )( ) 













 = Number of State Employees

Number of County Employees Annual Emissions Pollutant Emission Factor CoalConsumption

The Industrial Coal Combustion emissions were calculated using the same emission factors as 

Commercial/Institutional Coal (see above).

where: 

Number of Allegheny County Employees =48,5442 3

Number of Pennsylvania Employees = 721,9022 3

Pennsylvania Coal Consumption = 42,900,812.75 tons25 26

Industrial Coal Consumption:

25 26

tons

tons

tons

tons

Other Industrial Consumption Annual Coal Report)

Other Industrial Consumption(Annual Coal Report) Industrial Consumption from State Energy Data

State Coal Consumption

42,900,812.75

3,498,000

3,121,000 48,083,000

2000 (

2002 2000

= ⋅ =

⋅

=

CO Emissions:

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

employees in state

employees in county tons

year

ton bituminous coal

lbs CO

Annual CO Emissions

15,866.6603

2000

1 31,733,320.58

721,902

48,544 42,900,812.75

11

= ⋅ =

= ⋅ ⋅

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002834

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 15,866.6603 × 0.00283 = 44.8538 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.002834

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 15,866.6603 × 0.00283 = 44.8538 tons CO per day

COMMERCIAL AND CONSUMER SOLVENT USE (SCC 2465000000)

This source category covers household products such as special naphthas, alcohols, carbonyls, 

and other organics that contain VOCs. There are no point sources associated with this category. 

County-level emissions were calculated using a composite per capita emission factor (see table 

below) and U.S. Bureau of the Census population data. The emission factor represents precontrol emission rates. A CE of 20 percent29 9 and an RP of 48.6 percent were applied to reflect 

the Federal Rule for consumer products. This yields a post-control VOC emission factor of 
21

7.078 lbs per capita which was used in all emission calculations. Each county’s emissions are 

estimated per the sample calculations listed below.

SUBCATEGORY EMISSION FACTOR

Household Products 0.79 lbs/person/year

Personal Care Products 2.32 lbs/person/year

Automotive Aftermarket Products 1.36 lbs/person/year

Adhesives and Sealants 0.57 lbs/person/year

FIFRA-Regulated Products 1.78 lbs/person/year

Coatings and Related Products 0.95 lbs/person/year

Miscellaneous Products 0.07 lbs/person/year

Total (Pre-Control) 7.84 lbs/person/year

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

( )( ) 



 



 = − ⋅ ⋅ 100 100 100

1 CE RP RE Annual VOC Emissions Emission Factor Population

where:

Emission Factor =7.84 lbs VOC/person/year30

Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County)7

CE (Control Efficiency) = 20%29

RP (Rule Penetration) = 48.6% 9

RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 100%

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

people

year

person

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

4494.1598

2000

1 8,988,319.557

100

100

100

48.6

100

20 1,269,904 1

7.84

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00274 9

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 4494.1598× 0.00274 = 12.3128 tons VOC per day

COMMERCIAL COOKING (5 SCCs)

Chain-Driven (Conveyorized) Charbroilers SCC 2302002100; Under-Fired Charbroilers SCC 

2302002200; Flat Griddles SCC 2302002300; Clamshell Griddles SCC 2302002400; and DeepFat Fryers SCC 2302002500

Criteria pollutant annual emissions associated with commercial cooking were compiled from the 

2002 nonpoint source National Emissions Inventory (NEI).31 The 2002 NEI reports commercial 

cooking emissions in five SCCs, each of which represents a specific equipment type. Source 
22

categories comprise emissions from all meat types for a particular piece of equipment. The 

following types of meat are included: hamburger, steak, fish, pork, and chicken. Emissions for 

deep-fat frying of french fries were also estimated. With the exception of deep-fat frying of 

french fries, commercial cooking activity was developed from survey data obtained from a Public 

Research Institute (PRI) report on charbroiling activity estimation in the State of California.32

31

 

Further details on the annual emission estimation methodology are available in the forthcoming 

2002 nonpoint source NEI documentation.

The NEI reports emissions for the following criteria pollutants: VOC, CO, PM10-PRI, and 

PM25-PRI (note, however, that each pollutant is not reported for each equipment type). The 

sources of the commercial cooking criteria pollutant emission factors are documented in a report 

prepared for EPA.33

Because temporal allocation data were not developed for this category in the 2002 NEI, the 

default temporal data reported in the EMCH for SCC 2302002000 (Commercial Charbroiling) 

were applied to each commercial cooking SCC.4 These data were used to estimate both summer 

season and winter season work weekday emission estimates.

SAMPLE SEASONAL CALCULATIONS (CHAIN-DRIVEN CHARBROILERS):

Annual VOC emissions (Allegheny County) = 10.7792 tons VOC per year

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday 

allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 10.7792 × 0.00275 = 0.0296 tons VOC per day

Annual PM10-PRI emissions (Allegheny County) = 43.0837 tons VOC per year

Winter work weekday PM10-PRI emissions = annual PM10-PRI emissions× winter work 

weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Winter work weekday PM10-PRI emissions = 43.0837 × 0.00275 = 0.1185 tons VOC per day

COMPOSTING (3 SCCs) 

(Biosolids SCC 2680001000, Mixed Waste 2680002000, Green Waste 2680030000)

Composting refers to the use of both aerobic and anaerobic microbial processes to degrade waste 

materials for beneficial refuse. Compostable wastes include biosolids (sewage sludge), manure, 

green waste ( e.g., landscape trimmings, grass clippings), and other biodegradable materials such 

as food waste. Composting produces emissions of NH3, VOC, and methane. Emissions for each 

county were estimated using a biosolids-generation-based emission factor65. Figures on material 

composted were obtained from BioCycle’s nationwide survey34

Each county’s emissions were estimated per the sample calculations below.

SAMPLE NH3 EMISSION CALCULATION:
23

Annual NH3 Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Tons material composted)

Where:

Emissions Factor = 3.28 lbs NH3/ton Biosolids 

2.81 lbs NH3/ton Mixed Waste 

0.82 lbs NH3/ton Green Waste

Tons Biosolids = 3,321.65 (Allegheny County) 

( tons Biosolids)

year

lbs NH ton Biosolids Annual NH Emissions 3,321.65 3.28 3/ 3 



 



 =

Annual NH3 Emissions = 10895.012 * 

lbs

ton

2000

1 = 5.45 tons NH3/ year

DEGREASING (4 SCCs)

(Auto Repair (Cold Cleaning) SCC 2415360000, Manufacturing (Cold Cleaning) SCC 

2415300000, Electronics (Vapor/In-Line) SCC 2415230000, Other (Vapor/In-Line) SCC 

2415200000)

Surface cleaning, also known as “degreasing”, includes the solvent cleaning or conditioning of 

metal surfaces and parts, fabricated plastics, electronic and electrical components and other 

nonporous substrates. These cleaning processes are designed to remove foreign material, such as 

oils, grease, waxes and moisture, usually in the preparation for further treatment, such as painting, 

electroplating, galvanizing, anodizing or applying conversion coatings. Three basic types of 

surface cleaning operations are currently used: cold cleaning, vapor cleaning, and in-line or 

conveyorized cleaning, which can be either a cold or vapor cleaning process. VOC emission results

from the evaporation of solvents used in these processes.

Cold cleaning is a batch process in which solvents are applied at room temperature or slightly 

heated. Parts are immersed in a solvent, usually mineral spirits. Parts too large for immersion may 

be sprayed or wiped with a solvent. The primary cold cleaning application is cleaning of tools or 

metal parts at service and automotive repair stations and manufacturing facilities. Cold cleaning 

may incorporate covers or freeboards to limit the evaporative loss of solvents.

In-line cleaners use automated load systems (typically conveyors) to maintain a continuous feed to 

the cleaning unit. These units use both cold and vapor-cleaning methods as described above, with 

the majority being halogenated solvent cleaning systems. These units are used for large-scale 

operations and are usually enclosed except to the conveyor inlet or exit. A common application of 

in-line cleaners is cleaning printed circuit boards for the electronic and electrical component 

industries.

The Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) developed the following population-based 

methods for estimating degreasing emissions. Point source emissions, where present, were 

subtracted from these emission estimates. 
24

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

( )( ) 



 



 = − ⋅ ⋅ 100 100 100

1 CE RP RE Annual VOC Emissions Emission Factor Population

where:

Auto Repair (Cold Cleaning) VOC Emission Factor = 2.5 lbs VOC/person/year35

Manufacturing (Cold Cleaning) VOC Emission Factor = 1.1 lbs 

VOC/person/year35

Electronics (Vapor/In-Line) VOC Emission Factor = 0.21 lbs VOC/person/year35

Other (Vapor/In-Line) VOC Emission Factor = 0.49 lbs VOC/person/year35

Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County)7

Auto Repair Cold Cleaning CE (Control Efficiency) = 66%36

Manufacturing Cold Cleaning CE (Control Efficiency) = 66%36

Electronics Vapor/In-Line CE (Control Efficiency) = 63%36 37

Other Vapor/In-Line CE (Control Efficiency) = 63%36 37

All Categories RP (Rule Penetration) = 100%

All Categories RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 80%

Allegheny County Auto Repair (Cold Cleaning) VOC Emissions Calculation:

( )

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

people

year

person

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

749.2434

2000

1 1,498,486.72

100

80

100

100

100

66 1,269,904 1

2.5

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 



















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions calculation for Allegheny County Auto Repair (Cold Cleaning):

Degreasing (all categories) summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00385 9

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 749.2434 × 0.00385 = 2.8817 tons VOC per day

DRY CLEANERS (SCC 2420000370)

Three types of dry cleaning operations are used: coin-operated facilities using perchloroethylene 

(perc); commercial/industrial facilities using perc; and commercial/industrial facilities using 

VOC solvents. As perc is no longer considered a VOC, only commercial/industrial facilities 

using VOC solvents are considered for the area source inventory. The first two categories are not 

included in the baseline inventory. They are, however, retained for use in the modeling inventory 

as required by EPA guidance. 
25

Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates. Each 

county’s emissions were estimated per the sample calculations below using a per capita emission 

factor and US Census Bureau population data. The emission factor was determined by the 

Department using 1990 survey data supplied by the industry (contacts with the Pennsylvania and 

Delaware Cleaners Association indicate that more recent data are not available).38

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Population)

where:

Emission Factor = 0.15 lbs VOC/person/year38

Population = 1,269,904 (2002 Allegheny County)7

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

people

year

person

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

95.2428

2000

1 190,485.6

1,269,904

0.15

= ⋅ =





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 95.2428× 0.0028=0.2674 tons VOC per day

ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES (SCC 2401060000)

The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evaporation of the solvent used in 

the coating process in the manufacture of electrical appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, 

laundry equipment, and electric housewares. Emissions for each county were estimated per the 

sample calculations below using an employment-based emission factor and the number of 

employees in the NAICS codes, 333414, 335211, 335212, 335221, and 335228. The number of 

employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns2 and grown to 

2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth 

employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

3

 Point source emissions, where 

present, were subtracted from these emission estimates. 

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

Emission Factor = 463 lbs VOC/employee/year16

Employees = 150 (Allegheny County) 2 3
26

( )

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

employees

year

employee

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

34.725

2000

1 69,450

150

463

= ⋅ =





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 34.725 x 0.00275=0.0955 tons VOC per day

ELECTRICAL INSULATION (SCC 2401065000)

The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evaporation of the solvent used in 

the insulation coatings applied to wire and cable. The emissions for each county were calculated 

using an employment-based emission factor and the number of employees in NAICS codes 

331422, 331491, 335311, 335921 and 335929. The number of employees in each county for 

2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns2 and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 

total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the 

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

3

 Each county’s emissions were estimated per the sample 

calculations below.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

Emission Factor = 290 lbs VOC/employee/year16

Employees = 58 (Allegheny County)

2 3

( )

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

employees

year

employee

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

8.41

2000

1 16820

58

290

= ⋅ =





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002774

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 8.41× 0.00277=0.0233 tons VOC per day
27

FACTORY FINISHED WOOD (SCC 2401015000)

The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evaporation of the solvent used in 

the gluing and coating process. The emissions for each county were calculated using an 

employment-based emission factor and the number of employees in NAICS codes 32192, 33711, 

321211, 321212, 321213, 321911, 321918, 321992, and 321999. The number of employees in 

each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns2 and grown to 2002 using the 

ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained 

from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

3

 Point source emissions, where present, were 

subtracted from these emission estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

Emission Factor = 131 lbs VOC/employee/year16

Employees =615 (Allegheny County)2 3

( )

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

employees

year

employee

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

40.2825

2000

1 80565

615

131

= ⋅ =





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 40.2825 x 0.0028=0.1141 tons VOC per day

FOREST FIRES (SCC 2810001000)

Forest fires in certain rural areas can produce very large, short-term emissions of VOC, NOx, and 

CO, SO2, and particulates. The emissions for each county were calculated using an emission 

factor from AP-4239 or the 1999 National Emissions Inventory40

39

and a loading factor from AP42 . The number of acres burned was obtained from the Department of Conservation and 

Natural Resources.41 Each county’s emissions were estimated per the sample calculations below. 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

Annual Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Loading Factor)(Acres Burned)

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 24 lbs VOC/ton of flora/year

39
28

NOx Emission Factor = 4 lbs NOx/ton of flora/year39

CO Emission Factor = 140 lbs CO/ton of flora/year39

Loading Factor = 11 tons of flora/acre39

Acres Burned = 3.85 acres (Westmoreland County)41

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions poundsVOC per year

acres burned

acre

tons of flora

year

ton of flora

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

0.5082

2000

1 1016.4

3.85 11

24

= ⋅ =





 

























=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00554

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.5082× 0.0055=0.002795 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:

( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

acres burned

acre

tons of flora

year

ton of flora

lbsCO

Annual CO Emissions

2.9645

2000

1 5929

3.85 11

140

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00554

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 2.9645× 0.0055=0.0163 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.000564

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 2.9645× 0.00056=0.0017 tons CO per day

FUEL OIL COMBUSTION (3 SCCs)

(Residential Distillate Fuel Oil SCC 2104004000, Commercial/Institutional Distillate Fuel Oil 

SCC 2103004000, Commercial/Institutional Residual Fuel Oil SCC 2103005000)

Distillate and residual oil combustion sources, which emit VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, Pb, and PM are 

grouped into three categories: Commercial/Institutional, Residential, and Industrial. Industrial 

source emissions are captured in the point source inventory. For Commercial sector categories, 

point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from the emissions of the corresponding 
29

county. Fuel oil emissions were calculated for each county using fuel use estimates derived by 

allocating Commonwealth consumption estimates from the Energy Information Administration 

to individual counties. The county allocations were performed using data obtained from the 

County Business Patterns and the U.S. Census Bureau. 

 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

Residential Distillate Fuel Oil:

Residential fuel oil usage was determined by allocating the total residential fuel oil use to each 

county. The residential fuel oil consumption was allocated by the ratio of dwelling units (DU) 

using distillate fuel oil in a county to the number of dwelling units burning distillate fuel oil in 

the Commonwealth. The following is the general equation for the calculation of usage for 

residential sources of fuel oil combustion. 

( ) 













 = State Fuel -Oil - Burning DU

County Fuel -Oil - Burning DU Annual Fuel Oil Usage PA Residential Distillate Fuel Oil Usage

where:

PA Residential Distillate Fuel Use = 829,470 thousands of gallons42

2000 County Fuel-Oil-Burning DUs = 8123 Dwelling Units (Allegheny 

County)7

2000 State Fuel-Oil-Burning DUs = 1,217,155 Dwelling Units7

VOC Emissions:

tons VOCper year pounds

ton AnnualVOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

Dwelling Units

Dwelling Units thousands of gallons gallonslbsVOC AnnualVOC Emissions

1.9375

2000

1 3874.9784

1,217,155

8123 829,470

1000

0.7

= ⋅ =

= ⋅ ⋅

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0001654

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 1.9375× 0.000165=0.000319 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:

tons COper year pounds

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

Dwelling Units

Dwelling Units thousands of gallons gallonslbsVOC Annual CO Emissions

13.8392

2000

1 27,678.4173

1,217,155

8123 829,470

1000

5

= ⋅ =

= ⋅ ⋅

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0001654

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 13.8392× 0.000165=0.00228 tons CO per day
30

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.0006264

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 13.8392× 0.00626=0.0866 tons CO per day

Commercial/Institutional Distillate Fuel Oil:

The total amount of distillate fuel oil was apportioned to each county according to the number of 

commercial sector (i.e., SIC code 50-89) facilities. The number of commercial facilities in 2001 

was used for this allocation because 2001 data were the last year available.2 Total 

Commonwealth use was obtained from the Energy Information Administration.

42 Each county’s 

emissions for commercial/institutional fuel oil combustion were estimated per the following 

sample calculations. 

( )( ) 













 = Number of StateFacilities

Number of County Facilities Annual Emissions Emission Factor PACommercial / Institutional Distillate Fuel Oil Use

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 0.34 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

NOx Emission Factor = 20 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

CO Emission Factor = 5 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

SO2 Emission Factor = 142 lbs/1000 gallons/year39 × 0.3% sulfur content = 

42.6 lbs/1000 gallons/year

PM10-FIL Emission Factor = 1.08 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PM25-FIL Emission Factor = 0.83 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PM-CON Emission Factor = 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

Lead Emission Factor = 0.001268 lbs/1000 gallons/yearError! Bookmark not 

defined.

Distillate Fuel Sulfur Content = 0.3%27

County Facilities = 24,654 (Allegheny County)2

Commonwealth Facilities = 197,7952

PA Commercial/Institutional Distillate Fuel Oil Use = 301,554,000 gallons42

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOCper year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

Facilities

Facilities 301,554 thousands of gallons

year

gallons

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

6.3898

2000

1 12,779.5656

197,795

1000 24,654

0.34

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.001704

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 6.3898 × 0.00170=0.0108 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:
31

( )

tonsCO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions poundsCO per year

Facilities

Facilities 301,554 thousands of gallons

year

gallons

lbsCO

Annual CO Emissions

93.9674

2000

1 187,934.7889

197,795

1000 24,654

5

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.001704

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 93.9674 × 0.00170=0.1595 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00404

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 93.9674 × 0.0040=0.3733 tons CO per day

Commercial/Institutional Residual Fuel Oil:

The total amount of residual fuel oil was apportioned to each county according to the number of 

commercial facilities, which was obtained from County Business Patterns.

2

 The total 

Commonwealth use was obtained from the Energy Information Administration.

42 Each county’s 

emissions for commercial/institutional fuel oil combustion were estimated per the following 

sample calculations. 

( )( ) 













 = Number of State Facilities

Number of County Facilities Annual Emissions Emission Factor PA CommercialResidual Fuel Oil Use

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 1.13 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

NOx Emission Factor = 55 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

CO Emission Factor = 5 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

SO2 Emission Factor = 157 lbs/1000 gallons/year39 × 1.05% sulfur content = 

164.85 lbs/1000 gallons/year

PM10-FIL Emission Factor = 5.17 lbs/1000 gallons/year × 0.19% ash content 

= 0.9823 lbs/1000 gallons/year

39

PM25-FIL Emission Factor = 1.92 lbs/1000 gallons/year × 0.19% ash content 

= 0.3648 lbs/1000 gallons/year

39

PM-CON Emission Factor = 1.5 lbs/1000 gallons/year

39

Lead Emission Factor = 0.00155 lbs/1000 gallons/yearError! Bookmark not 

defined.

Residual Fuel Sulfur Content = 1.05% 43

County Facilities = 24,654 (Allegheny County)2

Commonwealth Facilities = 197,7952

PA Commercial/Institutional Residual Fuel Oil Use = 16,597,000 gallons42
32

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOCper year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

Facilities

Facilities 16,597 thousands of gallons

year

gallons

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

1.1688

2000

1 2337.6534

197,795

1000 24,654

1.13

= ⋅ =









































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.001704

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 1.1688 × 0.00170= 0.00198 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:

( )

tonsCO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions poundsCO per year

Facilities

Facilities 16,597 thousands of gallons

year

gallons

lbsCO

Annual CO Emissions

5.1718

2000

1 10,343.5991

197,795

1000 24,654

5

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00170 4

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 5.1718 × 0.00170=0.00878 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.0040 4

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 5.1718 × 0.0040 = 0.0205 tons CO per day

GASOLINE MARKETING (5 SCCs)

(Stage I SCC 2501060053, Stage II Uncontrolled SCC 2501060101, Stage II Controlled SCC 

2501060102, Underground Storage Tank Breathing and Emptying SCC 2501060201, Truck 

Transit SCC 2505030120)

Gasoline marketing involves the operations typically associated with transporting gasoline from 

refineries to final consumption in gasoline-powered vehicles. Evaporative emissions of VOCs 

occur at all points in the distribution process. The operations that were inventoried as area 

sources are gasoline dispensing outlets and gasoline tank trucks in transit. Bulk terminals and 

outlets are inventoried as point sources. VOC emissions result from the following sources: 1) 
33

Stage I (tank truck unloading into underground storage tanks), 2) Stage II (vehicle fueling), 3) 

Underground Storage Tank Breathing and Emptying, and 4) Truck Transit. 

Each category’s AP-42 emission factor is based on the average daily throughput that was 

calculated from monthly data obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue Bureau of 

Motor Fuel Taxes. The vehicle miles traveled (VMT), which were obtained from Dan Szekeres 

of the Baker Corporation44, was used to apportion the gasoline throughput to each county. 

Control efficiency (CE), rule penetration (RP), and rule effectiveness (RE) factors were applied 

to Stage I for each county to reflect the application of vapor balance systems. A RE factor was 

applied to Stage II to each regulated county. CE, RP, and RE factors were applied to 

Underground Storage Tank Breathing to reflect the application of pressure relief valves. There 

were no point sources for this source category. Each county’s emissions were estimated per the 

following sample calculations.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Stage I:

( )( ) 













 = State Annual VMT

County Annual VMT Annual VOC Emissions Emission Factor State Annual Gasoline Sales

where: 

Emission Factor = 1.92 lbs VOC/1000 gallons39

State Annual Gasoline Sales = 5,238,145,337 gallons/year45

County Annual VMT = 8,836,074,725 miles (Allegheny County) 44

State Annual VMT = 97,021,666,321 miles44

Control Efficiency (CE) = 96%46 47

Rule Penetration (RP) = 96%46 47

Rule Effectiveness (RE) = 80%

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

miles

miles

day

gallons

gallons

lbs VOC Annual VOC Emissions

120.3185

2000

1 240,637.0855

100

80

100

96

100

96 1

97,021,666,321

5,238,145,337 8,836,074,725

1000

1.92

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 













































 =

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month gasoline sales/annual gasoline sales ×

weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 1,370,092,015/5,238,145,337× 0.8333/65 = 0.00335 4 45

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 120.3185 × 0.00335 = 0.4035 tons VOC per day

Stage II:

Vehicle refueling VOC emissions are estimated using MOBILE6.2-based emission factors;48

45 monthly gasoline sales estimates; and county-level, annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) 

data.44 MOBILE6.2 provided monthly, emission factors for each county in Pennsylvania. 
34

MOBILE6.2 input files were set up to model refueling emission factors in a manner similar to 

that used for calculating onroad mobile source emissions for 2002. For each county, twelve 

monthly scenarios were modeled, along with an ozone season scenario and a winter scenario. 

These scenarios used the same 2002 monthly temperature and fuel inputs that were used in 

preparing onroad mobile source emissions. Each input file also called upon the external countyspecific age distribution file developed for 2002. No speed information or I/M program 

information was modeled, as these are not needed in the refueling calculations.

Stage II control program information was included for the counties with controls based on 

program information regarding control efficiency from Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania counties 

with Stage II controls are Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Bucks, Butler, Chester, Delaware, 

Fayette, Montgomery, Philadelphia, Washington, and Westmoreland.49 Vehicle-specific 

emission factors were then obtained in the database output format of MOBILE6.2. Using the 

fuel economy data and VMT fraction data contained in the MOBILE6.2 output files, the gram per 

mile emission factors were first converted to gram per gallon emission factors. These gram per 

gallon emission factors were then weighted according to the VMT fraction of each gasoline 

vehicle type to obtain monthly, county-specific gram per gallon emission factors weighted for all 

gasoline vehicle types. 

VMT data were used to allocate monthly Pennsylvania gasoline sales to each county. These are 

the same gasoline sales figures that are used to estimate Stage I emissions. The MOBILE6.2 

emission factors were then multiplied by the corresponding gasoline sales data to estimate 

refueling emissions. The VOC emissions calculations provide emissions at the county level for 

each month of 2002.

( )( ) 













 = State VMT

County VMT Allegheny June VOC Emissions VOC Emission Factor Monthly State Gasoline Sales

where:

Allegheny County June Emission Factor = 1.027 grams/gallon48

PA June Gasoline Consumption =443,778,938 gallons45

Allegheny County 2002 VMT = 8,836,074,725 miles44

PA 2002 VMT = 97,021,666,321 miles44

( )

= ∑ =

= ⋅ ⋅ =































 =

Annual Allegheny County VOC Emissions Monthly Allegheny County Emissions tons VOC

tons VOC

lb

ton

g

lb Allegheny June VOC Emissions g VOC

miles

miles gallons gallong VOC Allegheny June VOC Emissions

573.8276

45.7546

2000

1

453.59

1 41,507,615.1

97,021,666,321

8,836,074,725 443,778,938 1.027

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month gasoline sales/annual gasoline sales ×

weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer
35

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 1,370,092,015/5,238,145,337× 0.715/65 = 0.00288 4 45

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 573.8276 × 0.00288 = 1.6510 tons VOC per day

 

Underground Storage Tank Breathing and Emptying:

( )( ) 













 = State Annual VMT

County Annual VMT Annual VOC Emissions Emission Factor State Annual Gasoline Sales

where: 

Emission Factor = 1.0 lbs VOC/1000 gallons39

State Annual Gasoline Sales = 5,238,145,337 gallons/year45

County Annual VMT = 8,836,074,725 miles (Allegheny County) 44

State Annual VMT = 97,021,666,321 miles44

Control Efficiency (CE) = 90% 46 50

Rule Penetration (RP) = 96%46 50

Rule Effectiveness (RE) = 80%

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

miles

miles

day

gallons

gallons

lbs VOC Annual VOC Emissions

73.6572

2000

1 147,314.4698

100

80

100

96

100

90 1

97,021,666,321

5,238,145,337 8,836,074,725

1000

1.0

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 













































 =

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month gasoline sales/annual gasoline sales ×

weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 1,370,092,015/5,238,145,337× 0.715/65 = 0.00288 4 45

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 73.6572 × 0.00288 = 0.2119 tons VOC per day

Truck Transit:

( )( ) 













 = State Annual VMT

County Annual VMT Annual VOC Emissions Emission Factor State Annual Gasoline Sales

where: 

Emission Factor = 0.06 lbs VOC/1000 gallons39

State Annual Gasoline Sales = 5,238,145,337 gallons/year45

County Annual VMT = 8,836,074,725 miles (Allegheny County) 44

State Annual VMT = 97,021,666,321 miles44

(The emission factor is based on the assumption that gasoline delivery is via single trips and 

accounts for both full and empty truck travel.)
36

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

miles

miles

day

gallons

gallons

lbs VOC Annual VOC Emissions

14.3116

2000

1 28,623.2831

97,021,666,321

5,238,145,337 8,836,074,725

1000

0.06

= ⋅ =















































 =

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month gasoline sales/annual gasoline sales ×

weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 1,370,092,015/5,238,145,337× 0.8333/65 = 0.00335 4 45

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 14.3116 × 0.00335 = 0.04799 tons VOC per day

GRAPHIC ARTS (SCC 2425000000)

Graphic arts include operations that are involved in the printing of newspapers, magazines, 

books, and other printed material. Emissions of VOCs result from evaporation of solvents used 

in inks and cleaning. The emissions for each county were calculated using a per capita emission 

factor and U.S. Census Bureau population data. Point source emissions, where present, were 

subtracted from these emission estimates. 

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Population)

where:

Emission Factor = 1.3 lbs VOC/person/year16

Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County)7

825.4376 tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions ,650,875.2 pounds VOC per year

people

year

person

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

= ⋅ =

= ⋅

2000

1 1

1,269,904

1.3

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 825.4376 × 0.0028=2.2904 tons VOC per day

HIGH PERFORMANCE INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE SOLVENT (SCC 2401100000)

The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evaporation of solvents from 

surface coating of objects and materials that may exist in extreme conditions. There were no 

point sources. The emissions for each county were calculated using a per capita emission factor 
37

and U.S. Census Bureau population data. Each county’s emissions were estimated per the 

following sample calculations.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS: 

( )( ) 



 



 = − ⋅ ⋅ 100 100 100

1 CE RP RE Annual VOC Emissions Emission Factor Population

where:

Emission Factor = 0.8 lbs VOC/person/year16

Population = 1,269,904 people (Allegheny County)7

CE (Control Efficiency) = 20% 5

RP (Rule Penetration) = 100%

RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 100%

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton AnnualVOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

people

year

person

lbsVOC

AnnualVOC Emissions

406.3693

2000

1 812,738.56

1,269,904 1

0.8

100

100

100

100

100

20

= ⋅ =

= ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ ⋅

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00356 9

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 406.3693 × 0.00356=1.4473 tons VOC per day

KEROSENE (2 SCCs)

(Residential Kerosene SCC 2104011000, Commercial/Institutional Kerosene SCC 2103011000)

Kerosene combustion sources, which emit VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, and PM are grouped into two 

area source categories: Commercial/Institutional and Residential (all Industrial sector kerosene 

emissions are assumed to be included in the point source inventory). Emissions were calculated 

for each county using emission factors and Energy Information Administration fuel use 

information. The EIA kerosene consumption data are reported for each State. Commonwealth 

consumption was allocated to counties using data obtained from the County Business Patterns

and the U.S. Census Bureau.

 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

Residential Kerosene:

The emissions for residential kerosene combustion were determined by allocating total 

residential kerosene consumption in the Commonwealth to each county. This allocation was 

performed using the ratio of dwelling units (DU) heating with kerosene in a county to the number 

of dwelling units heating with kerosene in the Commonwealth. The following is the general 

equation used to calculate emissions from residential kerosene combustion. 
38

( )( ) 















−

− = State Kerosene Burning DUCounty Kerosene Burning DU Annual Emissions Emission Factor PA Residential Kerosene Fuel Oil Usage

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 0.7 lbs/1000 gallons/year27

NOx Emission Factor = 17.4 lbs/1000 gallons/year27

CO Emission Factor = 4.8 lbs/1000 gallons/year27

SO2 Emission Factor = 41.1 lbs/1000 gallons/year27

PM10-FIL Emission Factor = 1.08 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PM25-FIL Emission Factor = 0.83 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PM-CON Emission Factor = 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PA Residential Kerosene Fuel Use = 83,366 thousands of gallons42

2000 County Kerosene-Burning DUs = 8123 Dwelling Units (Allegheny 

County)7

2000 State Kerosene-Burning DUs = 1,217,155 Dwelling Units7

VOC Emissions:

tons VOCper year pounds

ton AnnualVOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

Dwelling Units

Dwelling Units thousands of gallons gallonslbsVOC AnnualVOC Emissions

0.1947

2000

1 389.4553

1,217,155

8123 83,366

1000

0.7

= ⋅ =

= ⋅ ⋅

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday VOC emissions =0.1947 × 0.00275=0.000536 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:

tons COper year pounds

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

Dwelling Units

Dwelling Units thousands of gallons gallonslbsVOC Annual CO Emissions

1.3353

2000

1 2670.5503

1,217,155

8123 83,366

1000

4.8

= ⋅ =

= ⋅ ⋅

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 1.3353 × 0.00275=0.00367 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 1.3353 × 0.00275=0.00367 tons CO per day

Commercial/Institutional Kerosene:
39

The total amount of fuel oil was apportioned to each county according to the number of 

commercial facilities, which was obtained from County Business Patterns.

2

 The total 

Commercial/Institutional kerosene consumption in the Commonwealth was obtained from the 

Energy Information Administration.42 The emission factors used for Commercial/Institutional 

Kerosene were the same as those used for Commercial/ Institutional Distillate Fuel Oil as per 

EIIP guidance. Each county’s emissions for commercial/institutional fuel oil combustion were 

estimated per the following sample calculations. 

( )( ) 













 = Number of StateFacilities

Number of County Facilities Annual Emissions Emission Factor PACommercial KeroseneUse

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 0.34 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

NOx Emission Factor = 20 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

CO Emission Factor = 5 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

SO2 Emission Factor = 142 lbs/1000 gallons/year39 × 0.3% sulfur content = 

42.6 lbs/1000 gallons/year

PM10-FIL Emission Factor = 1.08 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PM25-FIL Emission Factor = 0.83 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PM-CON Emission Factor = 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

Kerosene Sulfur Content = 0.3%27

County Commercial Sector Facilities = 24,654 (Allegheny County)2

Commonwealth Commercial Sector Facilities = 197,7952

Commercial/Institutional Kerosene Oil Use = 16,290 thousands of gallons42

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

Facilities

Facilities 16,290 thousands of gallons

year

gallons

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

0.3452

2000

1 690.3544

197,795

1000 24,654

0.34

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002834

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.3452 × 0.00283 = 0.000976 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:
40

( )

tonsCO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions poundsCO per year

Facilities

Facilities 16,290 thousands of gallons

year

gallons

lbsCO

Annual CO Emissions

5.0761

2000

1 10152.2703

197,795

1000 24,654

5

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002834

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 5.0761 × 0.00283 = 0.0143 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.002834

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 5.0761 × 0.00283 = 0.0143 tons CO per day

LANDFILLS (SCC 2620030000)

Municipal solid waste landfills receive primarily household and/or commercial waste. The VOC 

emissions from landfills are produced by volatilization, chemical reaction, and biological 

decomposition of refuse material. 

The emissions were calculated using the total amount of refuse in Pennsylvania’s municipal solid 

waste landfills, not the landfills’ capacity. Since landfills continue to emit VOCs long after they 

are closed (at least 20 years), data from active and inactive landfills were collected.

For active landfills, data from page two of the 2002 “Annual Facility Capacity Report” for each 

landfill were collected. In particular, Total Waste Accepted was needed for the final emissions 

calculation.

Several landfills that were included in the 1996 Pennsylvania area source inventory were not 

included in the compilation of 2002 facility reports provided by PA DEP. After confirming with 

PA DEP that these landfills are inactive (in a few cases the landfills had merely been renamed), 

the 1996 Total Waste Accepted data for these now-closed landfills were incorporated into the 

2002 inventory.

Total Waste Accepted was summed at the county level to calculate the total landfill emissions in 

each county. The emissions estimate was adjusted for precipitation. Each county’s emissions 

were estimated per the following sample calculation.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATION:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Precipitation Adjustment Factor)(Tons of Waste)
41

where:

Emission Factor = 13.6 tons VOC/1,000,000 tons of waste

Precipitation Adjustment Factor = 2.6

Amount of Waste = 19,422,841.6 tons of waste (Allegheny County)

( )( )

Annual VOC Emissions tons VOC per year

tons of waste

year

tons waste

tons VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

686.7917

2.6 19,422,841.6 1,000,000

13.6

=





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 686.7917 × 0.00275 = 1.8887 tons VOC per day

MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT (SCC 2401055000)

The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evaporation of the solvent used in 

the coating process in manufacturing facilities, such as engines, turbines, farm and garden 

equipment, computers, and office machinery. The emissions for each county were calculated 

using an employment-based emission factor and employee data from NAICS Codes 333 (except 

333314 and 333315), 33271, 332991, 332997, 3341, and 336391. The number of employees in 

each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns2 and grown to 2002 using the 

ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained 

from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

3

 Point source emissions, where present, were 

subtracted from the Machinery and Equipment category emission estimates. 

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 77 lbs VOC /employee/year16

Employees = 4944 employees (Allegheny County)2 3

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

employees

year

employee

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

190.344

2000

1 380,688

4944

77

= ⋅ =





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002774
42

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 190.344 × 0.00277 = 0.5282 tons VOC per day

MARINE COATING (SCC 2401080000)

This source category includes ship and boat building and repairing. The emissions were 

calculated using an employment-based emission factor and employee data from NAICS code 

33661. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business 

Patterns2 and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 

total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

3

 Each 

county’s emissions were estimated per the following sample calculations below. Point source 

emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates. 

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

Emission Factor = 308 lbs VOC /employee/year16

Employees = 52 employees (Allegheny County)2 3

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

Employees

year

Employee

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

8.008

2000

1 16,016

52

308

= ⋅ =





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 8.008 × 0.0028 = 0.0222 tons VOC per day

METAL CANS (SCC 2401040000)

This source category includes the manufacturing of metal cans, barrels, drums, kegs, and pails. 

The emissions from point sources, where present, were subtracted from the emissions of the 

corresponding county. The emissions for each county were calculated per the calculation below 

using an employment-based emission factor and employee data from NAICS Codes 332431 and 

332439. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business 

Patterns2 and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 

total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

3

 Point 

source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATION:
43

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees) 

where:

Emission Factor = 6,029 lbs VOC/employee/year16

Employees =48 employees (Allegheny County)2 3

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

Employees

year

Employee

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

144.696

2000

1 289,392

48

6,029

= ⋅ =





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 144.696 × 0.0028 = 0.4015 tons VOC per day

METAL FURNITURE AND FIXTURES (SCC 2401025000)

This source category includes manufacturing metal household and office furniture, such as beds, 

cabinets, desks, bookcases, and chairs. The emissions for each county were calculated per the 

sample calculations below using an employment-based emission factor and employee data for 

NAICS codes 337121, 337124, 337214, and 337215. The number of employees in each county 

for 2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns2 and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 

2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the 

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).3

 Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from 

these emission estimates. 

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

Emission Factor = 1,597 lbs VOC /employee/year16

Employees = 487 employees (Allegheny County)2 3
44

( )

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

employees

year

employee

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

388.8695

2000

1 777,739

487

1,597

= ⋅ =





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 388.8695 × 0.0028 = 1.0790 tons VOC per day

MISCELLANEOUS FINISHED METAL (SCC 2401050000)

This source category includes facilities which enamel, lacquer, and/or varnish metals. The 

emissions for each county were calculated per the sample calculations below using an 

employment-based emission factor and employee data from NAICS Codes 332812, 339911, 

339912, and 339914. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from 

County Business Patterns2 and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth 

employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics 

(BLS).

3

 Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates. 

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

Emission Factor = 2,877 lbs VOC/employee/year16

Employees = 683 employees (Allegheny County)2 3

( )

tons VOC per year pounds

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

employees

year

employee

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

982.4955

2000

1 1,964,991

683

2877

= ⋅ =





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 982.4955 × 0.0028 = 2.7262 tons VOC per day
45

MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING (SCC 2401090000)

This source category includes establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing products not 

classified in any other group such as jewelry, silverware, musical instruments, dolls, toys, games, 

pens, pencils, buttons, brooms, and caskets. The emissions for each county were calculated per 

the sample calculations below using a per capita emission factor and U.S. Census Bureau 

population data. Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission 

estimates. 

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS: 

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Population)

where:

Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs VOC/person/year16

Population =1,269,904 (Allegheny County)7

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

people

year

person

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

380.9712

2000

1 761,942.4

1,269,904

0.6

= ⋅ =

























=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284

Summer work weekday VOC Emissions = 380.9712 × 0.0028 = 1.0633 tons VOC per day

NATURAL GAS AND LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS (LPG) (4 SCCs)

(Residential Natural Gas SCC 2104006000, Commercial/Institutional Natural Gas SCC 

2103006000, Residential LPG SCC 2104007000, Commercial/Institutional LPG SCC 

2103007000)

Natural gas and LPG are used in residential, commercial/institutional, and industrial facilities. 

Industrial natural gas and LPG consumption is considered to be covered in the point source 

inventory. Area source natural gas and LPG emissions were estimated using fuel consumption 

data and AP-42 emission factors. Because monthly natural gas consumption data were available, 

these data were used in developing the summer and winter season work weekday allocation 

factors. Consumption data were apportioned according to the number of dwelling units heating 

with natural gas/LPG, which was available from U.S. Census Bureau data (for residential 

sources), and according to the number of commercial sector facilities, obtained from County 

Business Patterns (for commercial/institutional sources). Commercial and Residential LPG 

consumption was not available for 2002; therefore, the 2001 consumption was grown to 2002 by 
46

applying the ratio of 2002 Commercial/Residential propane sales in Pennsylvania to 2001 

Commercial/Residential propane sales in the Commonwealth. Commercial LPG consumption in 

2001 was obtained from the Energy Information Administration’s State Energy Data 2001. 

Propane sales for 2001 and 2002 were obtained from Petroleum Marketing Annual.51 52 Each 

county’s emissions were estimated using the sample calculations below. For Commercial sector 

categories, point sources, where present, were subtracted from the emissions of the 

corresponding county.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

Natural Gas:

Residential Natural Gas:

( )( )

















= ⋅

Natural - Gas - Burning State Dwelling Units

Natural - Gas - Burning CountyDwellingUnits

Annual Emissions EmissionFactor StatewideResidentialNaturalGasConsumption

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 5.5 lbs/MMcf (million cubic feet)/year39

NOx Emission Factor = 94 lbs/MMcf/year39

CO Emission Factor = 40 lbs/MMcf/year39

SO2 Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs/MMcf/year39

PM10-FIL Emission Factor = 1.9 lbs/MMcf/year39

PM25-FIL Emission Factor =1.9 lbs/MMcf/year39

PM-CON Emission Factor =5.7 lbs/MMcf/year39

Pb Emission Factor = 0.0005 lbs/MMcf/year39

Residential Natural Gas Consumption = 237,640 MMcf 53

County Dwelling Units Heating with Natural Gas = 474,292 (Allegheny County)7

State Dwelling Units Heating with Natural Gas = 2,452,941 units7

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

state dwelling units

county dwelling units MMcf

year

MMcf

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

126.3604

2000

1 252,720.7666

2,452,941

474,292 237,640

5.5

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00078354

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 126.3604 × 0.000783 = 0.0989 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:
47

( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

state dwelling units

county dwelling units MMcf

year

MMcf

lbs VOC

Annual CO Emissions

918.9846

2000

1 1,837,969.211

2,452,941

474,292 237,640

40

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00078354

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 918.9846 × 0.000783 = 0.7196 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor =0.0052654

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 918.9846 × 0.00526 = 4.8370 tons CO per day

Commercial/Institutional Natural Gas:

( )( ) 













 = StateCommercialUnits

CountyCommercialUnits Annual Emissions EmissionFactor PA CommercialNaturalGasConsumption

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 5.5 lbs/MMcf (million cubic feet)/year39

NOx Emission Factor = 100 lbs/MMcf/year39

CO Emission Factor = 84 lbs/MMcf/year39

SO2 Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs/MMcf/year39

PM10-FIL Emission Factor = 1.9 lbs/MMcf/year39

PM25-FIL Emission Factor = 1.9 lbs/MMcf/year39

PM-CON Emission Factor = 5.7 lbs/MMcf/year39

Pb Emission Factor = 0.0005 lbs/MMcf/year39

Commercial Natural Gas Consumption = 148,346 MMcf 53

County Commercial Sector Facilities = 24,654 (Allegheny County)2

Commonwealth Commercial Sector Facilities = 197,7952

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

state commercial units

county commercial units MMcf

year

MMcf

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

50.8488

2000

1 101,697.5786

197,795

24,654 148,346

5.5

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor =0.0012555

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 50.8488× 0.00125 = 0.0634 tons VOC per day
48

CO Emissions:

( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

state commercial units

county commercial units MMcf

year

MMcf

lbsCO

Annual CO Emissions

776.5997

2000

1 1,553,199.382

197,795

24,654 148,346

84

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0012555

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 776.5997× 0.00125 = 0.9683 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor =0.0047855

Winter work weekday CO emissions =776.5997× 0.00478 = 3.7121 tons CO per day

LPG:

Residential LPG:

( )( )

















−

−

= ⋅

LPG Burning State Dwelling Units

LPG Burning County Dwelling Units

Annual Emissions Emission Factor Residential LPG Consumption

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 0.5 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

NOx Emission Factor = 14 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

CO Emission Factor = 1.9 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

SO2 Emission Factor = 0.1 lbs/1000 gallons/year39 × 0.54 grains/100 cubic feet 

= 0.054 lbs/1000 gallons/year

PM10-FIL Emission Factor = 0.4 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PM25-FIL Emission Factor = 0.4 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PM-CON Emission Factor = 0.506 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

Residential LPG Sulfur Content = 0.54 grains/100 cubic feet27

Residential LPG Consumption = 157,014,873.6 gallons25 51 52

County Dwelling Units Heating with LPG = 4317 units (Allegheny County)7

Commonwealth Dwelling Units Heating with LPG = 145,254 units7

Residential LPG Consumption Calculation: 25 51 52
49

gallons LPG

barrel

gallons . thousand barrels LPG

thousand barrels LPG

thousand gallons LPG per day

. thousand gallons LPG per day . thousand barrels LPG

PA PropaneConsumption

PA PropaneConsumption Residential LPG Consumption Residential LPG Consumption

157,014,873.6

1

42 3738 449

3738.449

765.9

822 8 3479 92024

2001

2002 2002 (2001 )

⋅ =

=

= ⋅

= ⋅

Data Sources for Residential LPG Consumption Calculation:

2001 Residential LPG Consumption25

2002 PA Propane Consumption51

2001 PA Propane Consumption43

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

county dwelling units

county dwelling units gallons

year

gallons

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

1.1666

2000

1 2333.2687

145,254

4,317 157,014,873.61000

0.5

= ⋅ =









































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 1.1666× 0.00275 = 0.00321 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:

( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

county dwelling units

county dwelling units gallons

year

gallons

lbs VOC

Annual CO Emissions

4.4332

2000

1 8866.4209

145,254

4,317 157,014,873.6 1000

1.9

= ⋅ =









































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 4.4332 × 0.00275 = 0.0122 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 4.4332 × 0.00275 = 0.0122 tons CO per day

Commercial/Institutional LPG:
50

( )( ) 













 = StateCommercialUnits

CountyCommercialUnits Annual Emissions EmissionFactor CommercialLPGConsumption

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 0.5 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

NOx Emission Factor = 14 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

CO Emission Factor = 1.9 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

SO2 Emission Factor = 0.1 lbs/1000 gallons/year39× 0.54 grains/100 cubic feet 

= 0.054 lbs/1000 gallons/year

PM10-FIL Emission Factor = 0.4 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PM25-FIL Emission Factor = 0.4 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

PM-CON Emission Factor = 0.506 lbs/1000 gallons/year39

Commercial/Institutional LPG Sulfur Content = 0.54 grains/100 cubic feet27

Commercial LPG Consumption = 1,380,620.1 gallons25 51 52 (computed in the 

same manner as Residential LPG Consumption above)

County Commercial Facilities = 24,654 (Allegheny County)2

Commonwealth Commercial Facilities = 197,795 units2

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

state commercial units

county commercial units gallons

year

gallons

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

0.0430

2000

1 86.0431

197,795

24,654 1,380,620.1 1000

0.5

= ⋅ =









































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.0430× 0.0028 = 0.000122 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:

( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

state commercial units

county commercial units gallons

year

gallons

lbsCO

Annual CO Emissions

0.1635

2000

1 326.9640

197,795

24,654 1,380,620.1 1000

1.9

= ⋅ =









































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284

Summer work weekday CO emissions = 0.1635 × 0.0028 = 0.000462 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00284
51

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 0.1635 × 0.0028 = 0.000462 tons CO per day

OPEN BURNING (5 SCCs)

(Residential Municipal Solid Waste Open Burning SCC 2610030000; Residential Leaf Open 

Burning SCC 2610000100; Residential Brush Open Burning SCC 2610000400; 

Commercial/Institutional Open Burning SCC 2610020000, Industrial Open Burning SCC 

2610010000)

Open burning can be done in open drums or baskets, in fields and yards, and in large open dumps 

or pits. Materials commonly disposed of in this manner include municipal waste, auto body 

components, landscape refuse, agricultural field refuse, wood refuse, bulky industrial refuse, and 

leaves. For emission inventory purposes, Open Burning is divided into five categories: 

Residential Municipal Solid Waste (MSW); Residential Leaf; Residential Brush; 

Commercial/Institutional; and Industrial.

Criteria pollutant annual emissions associated with three of the Residential Open Burning 

categories (i.e., MSW, Leaf, and Brush) were compiled from an inventory prepared for the MidAtlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU).56 Because the MANE-VU estimates were 

prepared at the Census tract level, it was necessary to aggregate these estimates to the countylevel. In many cases, it was necessary to develop a county-level RP value by weighting MANEVU inventory Census tract level RP values by Census tract emissions. Seasonal emission 

estimates were calculated from the annual estimates using the temporal allocation profiles 

developed in the MANE-VU inventory project.

Annual emission estimates for Commercial/Institutional and Industrial Open Burning were 

calculated in this project using AP-42 emission factors and population and employment based 

emission activity loading factors.16 39 U.S. Census Bureau population data were used in the 

Residential and Commercial/Institutional calculations, while the number of Manufacturing 

employees (NAICS 31-33) was used for the Industrial category. The 2001 Manufacturing sector 

employment data from County Business Patterns2 was grown to 2002 using the ratio of the 2002 

Pennsylvania Manufacturing sector employment to the 2001 Pennsylvania Manufacturing sector 

employment obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.3

 Seasonal Commercial/Institutional 

and Industrial emission estimates were developed by applying temporal allocation profiles from 

EPA’s EMCH to the annual emission estimates.4 Commercial/Institutional and Industrial Open 

Burning are prohibited in the Commonwealth. An 80 percent RE value was applied to each 

county’s Commercial/Institutional and Industrial emissions to reflect less than 100 percent 

compliance with the burning ban.57 For the Industrial and Commercial sector source categories, 

point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates.

The following provides samples of the emission calculations performed in this effort for each of 

the five open burning categories.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:
52

Residential MSW Open Burning:

(See MANE-VU inventory report for discussion of annual emission calculations)56

Annual VOC emissions (Allegheny County) = 0.3823 tons VOC per year

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002156

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.3823× 0.0021 = 0.0008 tons VOC per day

Annual PM10-PRI emissions (Allegheny County) = 1.6979 tons VOC per year

Winter work weekday PM10-PRI emissions = annual PM10-PRI emissions× winter work weekday 

allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.002156

Winter work weekday PM10-PRI emissions = 1.6979 × 0.0021 = 7.2489 tons VOC per day

Residential Leaf Open Burning:

(See MANE-VU inventory report for discussion of annual emission calculations)56

Because the summer and winter season work weekday allocation factors for leaf burning are 0, 

summer season work weekday and winter season work weekday emissions are 0.

Residential Brush Open Burning:

(See MANE-VU inventory report for discussion of annual emission calculations)56

Annual VOC emissions (Allegheny County) = 0.2263 tons VOC per year

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.000556

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.2263× 0.0005 = 0.0001 tons VOC per day

Annual PM10-PRI emissions (Allegheny County) = 0.235 tons VOC per year

Winter work weekday PM10-PRI emissions = annual PM10-PRI emissions× winter work weekday 

allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.001756

Winter work weekday PM10-PRI emissions = 0.235 × 0.0017 = 0.00004 tons VOC per day

Commercial/Institutional Open Burning:

( )( )( ) 



 



 = − ⋅ ⋅ 100 100 100

1 CE RP RE Annual Emissions EmissionFactor LoadingFactor Population

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 30 lbs VOC/ton waste/year39
53

NOx Emission Factor = 6 lbs NOx/ton waste/year39

CO Emission Factor = 85 lbs CO/ton waste/year39

Loading Factor = 24 tons waste/1000 people39

Population = 94,437 people (Adams County – this is non-air basin county)7

CE (Control Efficiency) = 100%57

RP (Rule Penetration) = 100% 

RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 80%57

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

, people people

tons waste

year

ton waste

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

6.7995

2000

1 13,598.928

100

80

100

100

100

100 94 437 1

1000

24

30

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 



































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 6.7995× 0.00275 = 0.0187 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:

( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

, people people

tons waste

year

ton waste

lbsCO

Annual CO Emissions

19.2651

2000

1 38,530.296

100

80

100

100

100

100 94 437 1

1000

24

85

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 



































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday CO emissions =19.2651× 0.00275 = 0.0530 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 19.2651 × 0.00275 = 0.0530 tons CO per day

Industrial Open Burning:

( )( )( ) 



 



 = − ⋅ ⋅ 100 100 100

1 CE RP RE Annual Emissions EmissionFactor LoadingFactor Employees

where:

Emission Factors are the same as for Commercial/Institutional Open Burning

Loading Factor = 160 tons waste/1000 employees39
54

Employees = 8,216 employees (Adams County – this is non-air basin county) 2 3

Control Efficiency = 100%57

Rule Penetration = 100% 

Rule Effectiveness = 80%57

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

employees employees

tons waste

year

ton waste

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

3.9437

2000

1 7887.36

100

80

100

100

100

100 8216 1

1000

160

30

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 







































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 3.9437 × 0.00275 = 0.0108 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:

( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

employees employees

tons waste

year

ton waste

lbs CO

Annual CO Emissions

11.1738

2000

1 22,347.52

100

80

100

100

100

100 8216 1

1000

160

85

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 







































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday CO emissions =11.1738 × 0.00275 = 0.0307 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 11.1738 × 0.00275 = 0.0307 tons CO per day

OTHER SPECIAL PURPOSE COATING (SCC 2401200000)

This category includes special purpose coatings used for applications such as maintenance 

operations at industrial and other facilities, auto refinishing, traffic paints, marine finishes, and 

aerosol sprays. Note that this category covers those specific coating processes not already 

included in other source categories (e.g., High Performance Industrial Maintenance Coatings). 

Emissions for this category were estimated using a per capita emission factor and U.S. Bureau of 

the Census population data. Each county’s emissions were calculated per the following sample 

calculations. 
55

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

( )( ) 



 



 = − ⋅ ⋅ 100 100 100

1 CE RP RE Annual VOC Emissions Emission Factor Population

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 0.8 lbs VOC/person/year16

Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County)7

Control Efficiency = 20% 5

Rule Penetration = 100%

Rule Effectiveness = 100%

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

people

year

person

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

406.3693

2000

1 812,738.56

100

100

100

100

100

20 1,269,904 1

0.8

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 



















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00356 9

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 406.3693 × 0.00356 = 1.4473 tons VOC per day

OTHER TRANSPORTATION (SCC 2401085000)

This source category includes the finishing of vehicles and vehicle parts not included in other 

source categories (note that area source emissions were not estimated for the Motor Vehicle 

Surface Coating category because all Pennsylvania automobile assembly plants are assumed to be 

included in the point source inventory). The emissions for each county were calculated per the 

sample calculations below using an employment-based emission factor and employee data from 

NAICS Codes 33633, 33634, 33635, 333924, 336312, 336322, 336399, 336411, 336413, and 

33651. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business 

Patterns2 and grown to 2002 using the ratio or 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 

total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.3 Point source 

emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates. Note that emissions 

for this category are reported using the Railroad SCC because there is no “Other Transportation” 

SCC.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 35 lbs VOC/employee/year16

Employees = 2556 employees (Allegheny County)2 3
56

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

employees

year

employee

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

44.73

2000

1 89,460

2556

35

= ⋅ =





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00287 4

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 44.73 × 0.00287 = 0.1282 tons VOC per day

PESTICIDE APPLICATION (SCC 2461800000)

Pesticides, which contain petroleum solvents and synthetic organic ingredients, are used to kill or 

retard the growth of insects, rodents, fungi, weeds, or microorganisms. The bulk of pesticide 

application is associated with agriculture and, therefore, occurs in rural areas. The VOC 

emissions for each county were estimated using an emission factor based on the number of 

harvested acres. Harvested acreage data were obtained from the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Service.58

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Acres Harvested)

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 3.5 lbs VOC /acre harvested/year16

Acres Harvested = 10,527.2490 acres harvested (Allegheny County)58

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

acres harvested

year

acres harvested

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

18.4227

2000

1 36,845.3716

10,527.2490

3.5

= ⋅ =

























=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002774

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 18.4227× 0.00277 = 0.0510 tons VOC per day

PORTABLE GASOLINE CONTAINERS (SCC 2501060300)

This category covers emissions from residential and commercial sector portable gasoline 

containers. This category accounts for permeation, diurnal, transport, spillage, and vapor 
57

displacement emissions. Permeation, diurnal, and transport emissions are based on daily 

gasoline container throughput data. Gasoline throughput for 2002 was estimated based on gas 

container population and use data obtained from a California Air Resources Board survey.59 The 

year 2002 residential container population was estimated from the county-level number of 

occupied housing units.60 For counties for which 2002 occupied housing units data were not 

available, 2000 year housing units data61

7

were projected to 2002 based on county population 

growth rates. The year 2002 commercial container population was estimated from the number 

of commercial sector businesses.62 County-level nonroad equipment gasoline consumption 

estimates were obtained from the NONROAD model.63 

County-level year 2002 housing unit, commercial facility, and gasoline throughput data were 

then used in the emission calculation procedures described in Control Measure Development 

Support Analysis of Ozone Transport Commission Model Rules.9

 For the permeation, diurnal, 

and transport emission processes, these procedures result in daily emission estimates for both 

residential and commercial. These emissions were converted to annual emissions by multiplying 

by 214 days based on the assumption that nonroad equipment is fueled via gas containers 

primarily between April and October. The resulting annual emission estimates were then added 

to the spillage and vapor displacement annual emissions estimates, which were developed from 

annual NONROAD model gasoline consumption data, to yield total portable gasoline container 

annual emissions for each county. Summer season work weekday allocation factors were 

developed from the NONROAD model temporal allocations and applied to the annual emissions 

estimates to obtain summer season workday emissions.63

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATION:

For Allegheny County:

Annual Permeation,Diurnal,and Transport VOC Emissions =∑ Daily Emissions × 214 days

where (calculated using Ozone Transport Commission methods):

Allegheny Residential Permeation VOC Emissions = 299,065.1043 g/day

Allegheny Residential Diurnal VOC Emissions = 2,582,567.049 g/day

Allegheny Residential Transport VOC Emissions = 141,733.9079 g/day

Allegheny Commercial Permeation VOC Emissions = 41,816.3711 g/day

Allegheny Commercial Diurnal VOC Emissions = 408,285.9064 g/day

Allegheny Commercial Transport VOC Emissions = 255,584.0428 g/day

Annual Permeation, Diurnal, and Transport VOC Emissions = 3,729,052.382 g/day × 214 

Annual Permeation, Diurnal, and Transport VOC Emissions = 798,017,209.6 g/year

Total Annual Emissions = Annual Permeation, Diurnal, and Transport Emissions + Annual 

Spillage Emissions + Annual Vapor Displacement Emissions

where:

Spillage VOC Emissions = 307,338,392.7 g/year

Vapor Displacement VOC Emissions = 93,509,532.4 g/year
58

Total Annual Emissions = 798,017,209.6 g/year + 307,338,392.7 g/year + 93,509,532.4 g/year

Total Annual Emissions = 1,198,865,134.7 g/year ×

g

ton

907,184.74

1

 = 1,321.5226 tons/year

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month proportion× weekday ratio/number of 

weekdays in summer

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.3600× 0.692/65 = 0.00383 63

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 1321.5226× 0.00383 = 5.0639 tons VOC per day

REFRIGERANT LOSSES (SCC 2399010000)

This source category covers industrial refrigerant losses from refrigeration equipment used in 

such industries as ice cream manufacturing, meat packing plants, ice manufacturing, and 

refrigerated warehousing. Losses occur in both the normal use of refrigeration systems and 

during malfunctions. Emissions for each county were estimated using an employment-based 

emission factor64,65 and the number of employees in the following NAICS codes: 311611, 

311612, 311613, 311615, 311512-311514, 31152, 311411, 311412, 311421-311423, 31181, 

31132, 31133, 31211-31213, 31171, 312113, 311991, 311999, 325211, 49312, 311612, 42281, 

42282. The number of employees in each county was obtained from County Business Patterns66

and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total 

Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Each county’s 

emissions were estimated per the sample calculations below.

SAMPLE NH3 EMISSION CALCULATION:

Annual NH3 Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees in Sector)

Where:

Emission Factor = 30 lbs NH3/ employee/ year

Employees = 8265 (Allegheny County)

( employees)

year

lbs NH employee Annual NH Eissions 8265 30 3/ 3 



 



 ≡

Annual NH3 Emissions = 247,950 pounds NH3 per year * lbs

ton

2000

1 = 123.975 tons NH3/ year
59

PORTABLE GAS CONTAINERS

This category covers emissions from portable gas container use, both commercial and 

residential. Emission estimates account for permeation, diurnal, transport-spillage, 

spillage, and vapor displacement emissions. Estimated use data is based on survey 

information from the California Air Resources Board. The number of housing units is 

used as an indicator for residential containers. The number of commercial businesses 

expected to have at least one gas container is used to estimate commercial use. Emissions 

for 1996 were taken from estimates developed for the analysis of the OTC Model Rules29. 

Emissions were then projected to 1999 using population as the growth indicatoPUBLIC 

OWNED TREATMENT WORKS (3 SCCs)

Public Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) are wastewater treatment plants typically owned by 

municipalities. Emissions are calculated for three POTW processes: POTW Wastewater 

Treatment Processes (SCC 2630020010), POTW Biosolids Processes (SCC 2630020020), and 

Biosolids Land Application (SCC 2630050000). Biosolids are recyclable solid, semisolid, or 

liquid untreated residue from sewage treatment in a wastewater treatment plant.

Although both VOC and NH3 emissions result from each of the three processes included in this 

category, VOC emissions are only estimated for POTW Wastewater Treatment Processes (SCC 

2630020010) because of the lack of VOC emission factors for the other processes. Annual NH3

emission estimates were taken from an on-going Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union 

(MANE-VU) inventory development project. As part of this Pennsylvania inventory effort, 

annual VOC emissions were estimated for the POTW Wastewater Treatment Processes category 

using the MANE-VU project Pennsylvania emission activity data (total POTW flow) and an AP42 sewage treatment emission factor.28 Summer season work weekday emissions were 

calculated for each process using a summer season work weekday allocation factor based on EIIP 

temporal allocation guidance.1

Year 2000 POTW flow data for Pennsylvania facilities were obtained from the EPA Office of 

Wastewater Management’s year 2000 Clean Watersheds Needs Survey.67

7

 Year 2002 wastewater 

flow was estimated from the county population change between 2000 and 2002. Year 2000 

statewide biosolids generation was obtained from BioCycle 2000.68

7

 Facility-level biosolids 

production was estimated based on allocating State generation using facility-level wastewater 

flow rates. Year 2002 biosolids generation was estimated by applying Bureau of Census county 

population growth rates to year 2000 generation. Land application of total biosolids generation 

was calculated by multiplying total generation by 55 percent, which represents the percentage of 

total Pennsylvania biosolids generation applied to land.68 Further information on the annual 

emission estimation methods for the processes in this category will be available in a forthcoming 

report prepared for MANE-VU. Where present, point source emissions were subtracted from the 
60

emissions of the corresponding county. Each county’s emissions were calculated per the 

following sample calculations.

SAMPLE VOC CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (EmissionFactor)(County Wastewater Flow)

where:

Emission Factor = 8.9 lbs VOC/millions of gallons flow

Flow = 75,290.54 million gallons (Allegheny County)

( )

tons VOC

lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions lbs

E6 gallons lbs

year

million gallons

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

335.04

2000

1 670,085.81

75,290.54 670,085.81

8.9

=













 =

= 



















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.003851

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 335.04 × 0.00385 = 1.2899 tons VOC per day

SAMPLE NH3 CALCULATION:

Annual NH3 Emissions = (G x EF NH3)/ 2000

Where:

G = Annual amount of wastewater processed (MMgal) = 75,290 (Allegheny Co.)

EFNH3 = Ammonia emission factor of 0.027 lb/ MMgal (Pechan, 2004a)64

Annual NH3 Emissions = (75,290 MMgal x 0.027 lb NH3)/ 2000= 1.016415 Tons NH3

RESIDENTIAL WOOD COMBUSTION (7 SCCs)

(Fireplaces: Without Inserts SCC 2104008001; Fireplaces: Inserts - Catalytic, non-EPA-certified 

SCC 2104008002; Fireplaces: Inserts - Non-catalytic, EPA-certified SCC 2104008003; 

Fireplaces: Inserts - Catalytic, EPA-certified SCC 2104008004; Woodstoves - Conventional 

SCC 2104008010; Woodstoves - Catalytic SCC 2104008030; and Woodstoves - Non-catalytic 

SCC 2104008050)
61

Criteria pollutant annual emissions associated with residential heating with wood were compiled 

from the 2002 nonpoint source National Emissions Inventory (NEI).31 The 2002 NEI reports 

residential wood combustion emissions in seven SCCs, each of which representing a specific 

combustion equipment type. The NEI reports emissions for the following criteria pollutants: 

VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, and PM25-PRI. The NEI residential wood combustion 

emission estimation methodology is based on the national population of each equipment type and 

an estimate of the amount of wood burned in each type of equipment. The national wood 

combustion estimates by equipment type were then allocated to counties using a number of steps. 

These steps incorporated information on heating degree days by climate zone, and the urban/rural 

designation and number of single-family detached homes in each county. Further details on the 

annual emission estimation methodology are available in a forthcoming 2002 nonpoint source 

NEI document. 31

The majority of the residential wood combustion emission factors were obtained from EPA's AP42 document.39 County-level seasonal throughput percentages developed for the 2002 NEI were 

applied in this effort to estimate winter season work weekday emissions (no residential wood 

combustion activity was allocated to summer season months).

SAMPLE SEASONAL CALCULATION (FIREPLACES WITHOUT INSERTS):

Annual PM10-PRI emissions (Allegheny County) = 59.8205 tons VOC per year

Winter work weekday PM10-PRI emissions = annual PM10-PRI emissions× winter work weekday 

allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.0044

Winter work weekday VOC emissions = 59.8205 × 0.0044 = 0.2632 tons VOC per day

PORTABLE GAS CONTAINERS

This category covers emissions from portable gas container use, both commercial and 

residential. Emission estimates account for permeation, diurnal, transport-spillage, 

spillage, and vapor displacement emissions. Estimated use data is based on survey 

information from the California Air Resources Board. The number of housing units is 

used as an indicator for residential containers. The number of commercial businesses 

expected to have at least one gas container is used to estimate commercial use. Emissions 

for 1996 were taken from estimates developed for the analysis of the OTC Model Rules29. 

Emissions were then projected to 1999 using population as the growth indicatoSOLID 

WASTE INCINERATION (2 SCCs)

(Commercial/Institutional Solid Waste Incineration SCC 2601020000, Industrial Solid Waste 

Incineration SCC 2601010000)
62

Solid waste may consist of any discarded solid materials from commercial or industrial sources. 

The materials may be combustible or noncombustible, and are often burned to reduce bulk, 

unless direct burial is either available or practical. The resulting pollutants for the purpose of this 

inventory are VOC, NOx, and CO. On-site incineration is the confined burning of waste leaves, 

landscape refuse, or other refuse or rubbish. Slash and large scale agricultural open burning are 

not included in this emission category.

The emissions for each county were estimated per the sample calculations below using emission 

factors and loading factors from AP-42, population data from the U.S. Census Bureau, and 

employee data from County Business Patterns. Point source emissions, where present, were 

subtracted from these emission estimates. 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

Commercial/Institutional Solid Waste Incineration:

Annual Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Loading Factor)(Population)

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 9.8 lbs VOC/ton waste burned/year39

NOx Emission Factor = 3.7 lbs NOx/ton waste burned/year39

CO Emission Factor = 37 lbs CO/ton waste burned/year39

Loading Factor = 54 tons/1000 people39

Population = 1,269,904 people (Allegheny County)7

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

, , people people

tons waste

year

ton waste burned

lbsVOC

Annual VOC Emissions

336.0166

2000

1 672,033.1968

1 269 904

1000

54

9.8

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 336.0166× 0.00275 = 0.9240 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:
63

( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

, , people people

tons waste

year

ton waste burned

lbs CO

Annual CO Emissions

1268.6341

2000

1 2,537,268.192

1 269 904

1000

54

37

= ⋅ =





































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday CO emissions =1268.6341× 0.00275 = 3.4887 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 1268.6341× 0.00275 = 3.4887 tons CO per day

Industrial Solid Waste Incineration:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Loading Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

Emission Factors are the same as noted above

Loading Factor = 560 tons/1000 employees39

Employees = 48,544 employees (Allegheny County)2 3

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton AnnualVOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

48,544 employees employees

tons waste burned

year

ton waste burned

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

133.2047

2000

1 266,409.472

1000

560

9.8

= ⋅ =









































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 133.2047× 0.00275 = 0.3663 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:

( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

48,544 employees employees

tons waste burned

year

ton waste burned

lbs CO

Annual CO Emissions

502.9158

2000

1 1,005,831.68

1000

560

37

= ⋅ =









































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor
64

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Summer work weekday CO emissions =502.9158× 0.00275 = 1.3830 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.002754

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 502.9158× 0.00275 = 1.3830 tons CO per day

STRUCTURE FIRES (SCC 2810030000)

Building fires can produce short-term emissions of VOC, NOx, CO, and PM. Structure fire 

emissions were estimated using emission factors, a loading factor, and a default number of fires 

per capita (note that PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, and PM-CON emission factors were not available). 

Population data were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau. Each county’s emissions were 

calculated per the following sample calculations.

Annual Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Loading Factor)(Per Capita # of Fires)(Population)

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 11 lbs VOC/ton material burned/year16

NOx Emission Factor = 1.4 lbs NOx/ton material burned/year16

CO Emission Factor = 60 lbs CO/ton material burned/year16

Loading Factor = 1.15 tons material/fire69

Per Capita Number of Fires = 0.0018 fires/person70

Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County)7

VOC Emissions:

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

people

person

fires

fire

tons material

year

tons material

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

14.4560

2000

1 28,912.168

1,269,904 1.15 0.0018

11

= ⋅ =

























































=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00242771

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 14.4560× 0.002427 = 0.03509 tons VOC per day

CO Emissions:
65

( )

tons CO per year lbs

ton Annual CO Emissions pounds CO per year

people

person

fires

fire

tons material

year

ton material

lbs CO

Annual CO Emissions

78.8514

2000

1 157,702.7342

1,269,904 1.15 0.0018

60

= ⋅ =

























































=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00242771

Summer work weekday CO emissions =78.8514× 0.002427 = 0.1914 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00312671

Winter work weekday CO emissions = 78.8514× 0.003126 = 0.2465 tons CO per day

TRAFFIC LINE PAINTING (SCC 2401008000)

Traffic paints are used to mark pavement in applications such as dividing lines for traffic lanes, 

parking space markings, crosswalks, and arrows. The markings are usually applied by 

Commonwealth or local highway maintenance crews. VOC emissions result from the 

evaporation of organic solvents during and shortly after application of the marking paint. Each 

county’s emissions were calculated per “Alternative Method Three” described in the EIIP 

emission estimation guidance document for this category.72 The calculation uses a national per 

capita emission factor based on 2002 data for national traffic paint consumption and U.S. 

population. Control efficiency, rule penetration, and rule effectiveness factors were incorporated 

into the final calculation.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

( )( )( ) 



 



 = ⋅ − ⋅ ⋅ 100 100 100

1 CE RP RE Annual VOC Emissions Emission Factor Per Capita Usage Factor Population

2002 U.S. Population

2002 National Traffic Paint Consumption Per Capita Usage Factor =

National per Capita Usage Factor = 39,397,000 gallons73 7 /288,368,698 people

National per Capita Usage Factor = 0.1366 gallons/person

where:

Emission Factor = 3.36 lbs VOC/gallon72

National per Capita Usage Factor = 0.1366 gallons/person

Population =1,269,904 (Allegheny County)7

CE (Control Efficiency) = 20% 5

RP (Rule Penetration) = 100%

RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 100%
66

( )( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions pounds VOC per year

gallons person people

year

gallon

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

233.1767

2000

1 466,353.4473

100

100

100

100

100

20 0.1366 / 1,269,904 1

3.36

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅





















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00356 9

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 233.1767 × 0.00356 = 0.8305 tons VOC per day

TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES (TSDF’S)

This source category applies to industrial wastewater and hazardous waste which is generated in 

many industry types and sizes and include general waste categories such as contaminated 

wastewaters, spent solvent residuals, still bottoms, spent catalysts, electroplating wastes, metal 

contaminated sludges, degreasing solvents, leaded tank bottoms, separator sludges, and offspecification chemicals. These wastes are generated at an industrial site and treated, stored 

and/or disposed either on-site at the industrial facility or off-site at a commercial facility. 

Operations involved in treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous wastes include impoundment 

and tanks, land treatment, landfills and waste piles, transfer and handling operation, injection 

wells, incinerators, and organic compound removal devices. 

The VOC emission estimates for this source category were developed by E.H. Pechan 

company.26 The estimates were derived from EPA Emissions Standard Division estimates. A 

growth factor , based on 1990 population and 1999 population projections , was applied to adjust 

for 1999 estimates. 

WINERIES (SCC 2302070005)

Winery emissions result from the entrainment of ethanol by carbon dioxide during wine 

fermentation. Factors affecting ethanol emissions are handling techniques, temperature, process 

equipment design, and fermenting parameters. Other sources of emissions from the wine making 

process are blending, transferring, racking and storing of the wine. 

Emissions were determined using 2002 county-level wine production data provided by the 

Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB).74 Because monthly production data were available, 

these data were used to develop the seasonal allocation factors for this category. The emission 

factors for both red and white wines were obtained from AP-42.75 Since the emission factors for 

the two types of wines are different, but wine type production data are no longer available, wine 

production in the Commonwealth was assumed to be 60 percent white wine and 40 percent red 

wine. 76 Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates. 

Each county’s emissions were estimated per the following sample calculations. 

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:
67

Annual VOC Emissions = (0.6 × White Wine Emission Factor + 0.4 × Red Wine Emission 

Factor) × (2002 Total Wine Production)

where:

White Wine Emission Factor = 1.80873 lbs VOC/1000 gallons white 

wine/year75

Red Wine Emission Factor = 4.6236 lbs VOC/1000 gallons red wine/year75

2002 Total Wine Production = 8.270 thousand gallons (Adams County)74

2002 Summer Wine Production = 3.000 thousand gallons (Adams County)74

White Wine Production Factor = 60% of wine produced76

Red Wine Production Factor = 40% of wine produced76

( )

tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions lbs VOC per year

thousand gallons gallons

lbs

gallons

lbs Annual VOC Emissions

0.0121

2000

1 24.2698

8.270

1000

4.6236 0.4

1000

1.80873 0.6

= ⋅ =















 = ⋅ + ⋅

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month wine production/annual wine production ×

weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 3.000/8.270× 0.715/65 = 0.00399 (Adams County)4 74

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.0121× 0.00399 = 0.0000484 tons VOC per day

WOOD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING (SCC 2401020000)

This source category includes establishments engaged in the manufacture of wood home or office 

furniture. VOC emissions result from the evaporation of solvents used in the finish coats and 

cleanup procedures. Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission 

estimates. Each county’s emissions were calculated according to the sample calculations below 

using a per employee emission factor and the number of employees in NAICS codes 337122, 

337127, 337129, 337211, and 337212. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was 

obtained from County Business Patterns2 and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total 

Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of 

Labor Statistics (BLS).3

A 30 percent reduction in VOC emissions was assumed based on a RACT-based regulation.77

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATION:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Employees)(30% Control Efficiency Reduction)
68

where:

Emission Factor = 1,311 lbs VOC/employee/year78

Employees = 256 employees (Allegheny County)2 3

Control Efficiency = 30%77

Rule Penetration = 100%

Rule Effectiveness = 80%

( )

. tons VOC per year lbs

ton Annual VOC Emissions , . pounds VOC per year

employees

year

employee

lbs VOC

Annual VOC Emissions

127 5341

2000

1 255 06816

100

80

100

100

100

30 256 1

1311

= ⋅ =





 



 − ⋅ ⋅ 



















=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions× summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002774

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 127.5341 × 0.00277 = 0.3539 tons VOC per day
A-1

APPENDIX A: REFERENCES

 1 Eastern Research Group, Inc., “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area 

Sources, Chapter 1, Introduction to Area Source Emission Inventory Development (Revised Final),” prepared for the 

Area Sources Committee, Emission Inventory Improvement Program, January 2001. (Note: Because this inventory 

was prepared prior to November 2005, the Commonwealth did not apply the rule effectivness guidance found in 

EPA-454/P-05-001)

2 U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, County Business Patterns 2001, Pennsylvania, available 

from http://www.census.gov/epcd/cbp/view/cbpview.html. 2003, accessed October 2003. 3 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics, available from http://www.bls.gov/cew/home.htm, 

accessed November 2003.

4 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Temporal Allocation Data,” Emissions Modeling Clearinghouse, 

available from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/temporal/, accessed November 2003. 5 63 FR 48848, 1998: Federal Register, "National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for 

Architectural Coatings, Final Rule, Volume 63, Number 176, September 11, 1998.

6 U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, “Table 2: 2002 Architectural Coating Shipments,” Current 

Industrial Reports, Paint and Allied Products: 2002, available from 

http://www.census.gov/industry/1/ma325f02.pdf), accessed October 2003. 7 U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, “County Population Estimates Data Sets,” available from 

http://eire.census.gov/popest/estimates_dataset.php, accessed November 2003. 8 Eastern Research Group, “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area Sources, 

Chapter 3, Architectural Surface Coating,” prepared for the Area Sources Committee, Emission Inventory 

Improvement Program, November 1995.

9 E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., Control Measure Development Support Analysis of Ozone Transport Commission 

Model Rules, prepared for the Ozone Transport Commission, March 2001. 10 Glen Heilman, Pennsylvania Association of Asphalt Material Applicators, personal communication with Andrea 

Ramsey, E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., February 2004.

11 Eastern Research Group, Inc., “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area 

Sources, Chapter 17, Asphalt Paving (Revised Final),” prepared for the Area Sources Committee, Emission 

Inventory Improvement Program, January 2001. 

12 Dan Szekeres, Michael Baker Corporation, personal communication with Andy Bollman, E. H. Pechan & 

Associates, Inc., December 2003.

13 25 Pa. Code Section 129.64, “Cutback Asphalt Paving,” available from 

http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.64.html, accessed February 2004. 14 Dan Szekeres, Michael Baker Corporation, personal communication with Andy Bollman, E. H. Pechan & 

Associates, Inc., December 2003.

15 Steve Fulk, Pennsylvania Association of Asphalt Material Applicators, personal communication with Andrea 

Ramsey, E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., February, 2004.

16 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Procedures for the 

Preparation of Emission Inventories for Carbon Monoxide and Precursors of Ozone, Volume 1, General Guidance 

for Stationary Sources, EPA-450/4-91-016, May 1991. 17 25 Pa. Code Section 129.75, “Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing.” available from 

http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.75.html, accessed January 2004. 18 63 FR 48806, 1998: Federal Register, “National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Automobile 

Refinish Coatings, Final Rule,” Volume 63, Number 176, September 11, 1998.

19 Lucy Adams, Radian Corporation, memorandum to SIP inventory preparers and EPA Regions, “VOC Emissions 

from Bakeries,” prepared under contract to the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA Contract No. 68-D0-0125), April 24, 1992. 20 Monthly statewide beer production data from Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, available from 

http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/stats/02stats/02beerstats.htm, accessed December 2003. 21 Brewery emission factor is the sum of individual brewery process emission factors found in Table 4-2 of Emission 

Factor Documentation for AP-42 Section 9.12.1: Malt Beverages, Final Report, prepared by Midwest Research 
A-2

 

Institute October 1996 and available from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch09/bgdocs/b9s12-1.pdf, accessed 

February 2004. 22 Brewery emission factor is the sum of individual brewery process emission factors found in Table 4-3 of Emission 

Factor Documentation for AP-42 Section 9.12.1: Malt Beverages, Final Report, prepared by Midwest Research 

Institute October 1996 and available from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch09/bgdocs/b9s12-1.pdf, accessed 

February 2004.

23 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Climatological Data: Pennsylvania July-December 2002

(Volume 107, Numbers 07-12), published by National Climatic Data Center, 2003. 24 U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, "Table H40 - House Heating Fuel Type", Census 2000: 

Summary File 3, [Data file], March 2003. 25 U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, State Energy Data, Pennsylvania, available from 

www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/main_pa.html. 2003, accessed November 2003. 26 U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Annual Coal Report 2002, DOE/EIA-0584 

(2002), 2003. 27 Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., “Final Summary of the Development and Results of a Methodology for 

Calculating Area Source Emissions from Residential Fuel Combustion,” prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, September 2002.

28 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Factor Information Retrieval Data System (FIRE) 6.23, October 2000.

29 63 FR 48819, 1998: Federal Register, “National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Consumer 

Products, Final Rule,” Volume 63, Number 176, September 11, 1998.

30 Eastern Research Group, “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area 

Sources, Chapter 6, Solvent Cleaning,” prepared for the Area Sources Committee, Emission Inventory Improvement 

Program, September 1997.

31 E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., “Documentation for the 2002 Nonpoint Source National Emission Inventory for 

Criteria and Hazardous Air Pollutants ,” prepared for Emission Factor and Inventory Group, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2002inventory.html, (forthcoming). 32 Public Research Institute, “Charbroiling Activity Estimation, Draft Report,” prepared for California Environmental 

Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board, March 2003.

33 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, “Methods for Developing a 

National Emission Inventory for Commercial Cooking Processes: Technical Memorandum,” prepared by E.H. 

Pechan & Associates, Inc., September 2003.

34 BioCycle, 2000. “2000 BioCycle National Survey – Solid Waste Composting Trends in the U.S.”, BioCycle, 

November 2000.

35 Eastern Research Group, ““Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area 

Sources, Chapter 5, Consumer and Commercial Solvent Use,” prepared for the Area Sources Committee, Emission 

Inventory Improvement Program, August 1996.

36 25 Pa. Code Section 129.63, “Degreasing Operations,” available from 

http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.63.html, accessed January 2004. 37 Federal Register, “Subpart T—National Emission Standards for Halogenated Solvent Cleaning,” Volume 59, 

Number 2331, December 2, 1994.

38 The Pennsylvania Dry Cleaners Association disclosed that 1.8 million pounds of VOCs were emitted in 

Pennsylvania in 1990 from dry cleaning operations.

Emission Factor = Total VOC emitted ÷ Pennsylvania Population

= 1.8 million lbs VOC ÷ 11.88 million people (1990 census)

= 0.15 lbs VOC/person/year

39 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Compilation of Air 

Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources, AP-42, Fifth Edition, January 1995. 40 E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., “Documentation for the Draft 1999 National Emissions Inventory (Version 3.0) 

for Criteria Air Pollutants and Ammonia: Area Sources,” prepared for Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 

Emission Factor and Inventory Group, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March 2003. Available from 

ftp://ftp.epa.gov/pub/EmisInventory/draftnei99ver3/criteria/documentation/area/ardoc_99nei_draftv3_0303.pdf, 

accessed February 2004.

41 Stan Piorkowski, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Forestry, personal 

communication with PJ Disclafani, E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., December 2003.
A-3

 42 U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Fuel Oil and Kerosene Sales, 2002, available 

from http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/fuel_oil_and_kerosene_sales/foks.html, accessed 

November 2003.

43 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, median sulfur content reported in the 1999 National Emissions Inventory, 

available from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/1999inventory.html#final3crit, accessed October 2003. 44 Dan Szekeres, Michael Baker Corporation, personal communication with Maureen Mullen, E. H. Pechan & 

Associates, Inc., February 2004.

45 Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, Bureau of Motor Fuel Taxes, “Monthly Report of Gallons” for 2002, 

provided by Paul Sload, December 2003.

46 25 Pa. Code Section 129.60, “Bulk Gasoline Plants,” available from 

http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.60.html, accessed February 2004. 47 25 Pa. Code Section 129.61, “Small Gasoline Storage Tank Control (Stage I Control),” available from 

http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.61.html, accessed February 2004. 48 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “User’s Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile Source Emission 

Factor Model,” EPA420-R-02-028, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality, October 2002.

49 25 Pa. Code Section 129.82. “Control of VOCs from Gasoline Dispensing Facilities (Stage II),” available from 

http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.82.html, accessed February 2004. 50 25 Pa. Code Section 129.59. “Bulk Gasoline Terminals,” available from 

http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.59.html, accessed February 2004. 51 U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Marketing Annual 2001, available 

from http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/FTPROOT/petroleum/048701.pdf, accessed November 2003. 52 U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Marketing Annual 2002, available 

from http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/petroleum_marketing_annual/pma.html, accessed 

November 2003.

53 U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, “Pennsylvania Natural Gas Long Summary,” 

available from http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_spa_a_d.htm. accessed November 2003. 54 U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, “Pennsylvania Natural Gas Residential 

Consumption,” available from http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n3010pa2M.htm, accessed November 2003. 55 U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, “Natural Gas Deliveries to Commercial 

Consumers in Pennsylvania,” available from http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n3020pa2M.htm, accessed 

November 2003.

56 E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., “Open Burning in Residential Areas, Emissions Inventory Development Report,” 

prepared for Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union, January 31, 2004. 57 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, “Summary of the Methodology Used to Determine 

Volatile Organic Compounds, Nitrogen Oxides, and Carbon Monoxide Emissions by Source Type for Calendar Year 

1999 in Pennsylvania,” no date reported.

58 U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, “Agricultural Statistics Database, Crops 

County Data,” available from http://www.nass.usda.gov:81/ipedb/, accessed October 2003.

59 California Air Resources Board, Public Meeting to Consider Approval of California’s Portable GasolineContainer Emissions Inventory, September 1999. 60 U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2002 American Community Survey, available from 

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Products/Profiles/Single/2002/ACS/PA.htm, accessed February 2004. 61 U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census 2000, available from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable?_bm=y&-

geo_id=04000US42&-_box_head_nbr=GCT-H6&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false&-

format=ST-2&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_GCTH6_US9&-_sse=on, accessed February 2004. 62 Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., MarketPlace CD-ROM, Jan.-Mar., 2002, April 2002. 63 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Draft NONROAD2002a, 

[Computer software]. Available June 16, 2003 at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/nonroadmdl.htm. 64 Pechan. Estimating Ammonia Emissions from Anthropogenic Sources – Draft Report, 

prepared for the US EPA, Emissions Inventory Improvement Program, prepared by E.H.Pechan & Associates, Inc. 

March 2004.
A-4

 65 Pechan. Technical Memorandum: MANE-VU 2002 Ammonia Emissions Inventory for Miscellaneous Sources –

Final, prepared for MARAMA by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. March, 2004.

66 U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, County Business Patterns 2001, Pennsylvania, available 

from http://www.census.gov/epcd/cbp/view/cbpview.html. 2003, accessed October 2003.

67 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Clean Watersheds Needs Survey 2000,” Office of Wastewater 

Management, available from http://cfpub.epa.gov/cwns/, accessed December 2003. 68 JG Press, Inc. “2000 Biocycle National Survey – Solid Waste Composting Trends in the U.S.” BioCycle, Vol. 41 

Issue 11, November 2000. 69 Eastern Research Group, “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area 

Sources, Chapter 18, Structure Fires,” prepared for Area Sources Committee, Emission Inventory Improvement 

Program, January 2001.

70 National Fire Protection Association, Fire Loss in the United States During 2002, September 2003. 71 U.S. Fire Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Fire Data Center, Fire in the United 

States: 1987-1996, August 1999, available from http://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/fius11th.pdf, 

accessed December 2003.

72 Eastern Research Group, “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area 

Sources, Chapter 14, Traffic Markings” prepared for Area Sources Committee, Emission Inventory Improvement 

Program, May 1997.

73 U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Current Industrial Reports: Paint and Allied Products: 

2002, MA325F(02)-1, July 2003. 74 Susan Rose, Office of Planning and Policy Management, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, personal 

communication with PJ Disclafani, E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., December 2003. 75 From Table 9.12.2-1 of emission factor documentation for AP-42 Section 9.12.2 Wines and Brandy, October 

1995, available from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch09/final/c9s12-2.pdf, accessed February 2004. 76 Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board figures showing Pennsylvania wine production in 1990. 77 30 Pa.B 2995, 2000: Pennsylvania Bulletin, "Surface Coating Processes," Volume 30, Number 24, Harrisburg, 

PA, June 10, 2000.

78 “Short List” of AMS SCCs and Emission Factors. July 1992.
Development of Emission Projections

For 2009, 2012, and 2018

For NonEGU Point, Area, and Nonroad Sources

In the MANE-VU Region

Final Report

February, 2007
About MARAMA

The Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association is an association of ten state and local 

air pollution control agencies. MARAMA's mission is to strengthen the skills and capabilities of 

member agencies and to help them work together to prevent and reduce air pollution impacts in 

the Mid-Atlantic Region. 

MARAMA provides cost-effective approaches to regional collaboration by pooling resources to 

develop and analyze data, share ideas, and train staff to implement common requirements. 

The following State and Local governments are MARAMA members: Delaware, the District of 

Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, 

Philadelphia, and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.

For copies of this report contact:

MARAMA

Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association

711 West 40th

Suite 312

Street

Baltimore, MD 21211

phone 410.467.0170

fax 410.467.1737

http://www.marama.org/

About MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

MACTEC, Inc. is a leader in the engineering, environmental and remedial construction 

industries. MACTEC provides premier management, technical, and professional services to help 

clients successfully manage complex businesses, projects, and facilities. MACTEC Federal 

Programs, Inc. is a division of MACTEC that provides these same services tailored to meet the 

unique needs of government agencies, including state/local agencies and federal agencies.
Development of Emission Projections

for 2009, 2012, and 2018

for NonEGU Point, Area, and Nonroad Sources

in the MANE-VU Region

Final Technical Support Document

Prepared for:

Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA)

Prepared by:

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

February 28, 2007

______________________ ______________________

Edward Sabo Douglas A. Toothman

Principal Scientist Principal Engineer
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Page i

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table of Contents

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 1-1

2.0 NONEGU POINT SOURCES ............................................................................................ 2-1

2.1 INITIAL 2002 POINT SOURCE EMISSION INVENTORY ..................................... 2-1

2.2 NONEGU POINT SOURCE GROWTH FACTORS .................................................. 2-3

2.2.1 EGAS 5.0 Growth Factors....................................................................................... 2-3

2.2.2 AEO2005 Growth Factors....................................................................................... 2-4

2.2.3 State Specific Growth Factors................................................................................. 2-5

2.2.3.1 Connecticut ...................................................................................................... 2-5

2.2.3.2 Delaware .......................................................................................................... 2-5

2.2.3.3 District of Columbia ........................................................................................ 2-5

2.2.3.4 Maine ............................................................................................................... 2-5

2.2.3.5 Maryland.......................................................................................................... 2-6

2.2.3.6 Massachusetts .................................................................................................. 2-6

2.2.3.7 New Hampshire ............................................................................................... 2-6

2.2.3.8 New Jersey....................................................................................................... 2-6

2.2.3.9 New York......................................................................................................... 2-6

2.2.3.10 Pennsylvania .................................................................................................... 2-6

2.2.3.11 Rhode Island .................................................................................................... 2-7

2.2.3.12 Vermont ........................................................................................................... 2-7

2.3 NONEGU POINT SOURCE CONTROL FACTORS................................................. 2-7

2.3.1 NOx SIP Call Phase I .............................................................................................. 2-8

2.3.2 NOx SIP Call Phase II............................................................................................. 2-8

2.3.3 NOx RACT in 1-hour Ozone SIPs............................................................................ 2-8

2.3.4 NOx OTC 2001 Model Rule for ICI Boilers ............................................................ 2-9

2.3.5 2-, 4-, 7-, and 10-year MACT Standards................................................................. 2-9

2.3.6 Combustion Turbine and RICE MACT.................................................................. 2-10

2.3.7 Industrial Boiler/Process Heater MACT ............................................................... 2-10

2.3.8 Refinery Enforcement Initiative ............................................................................. 2-10

2.3.9 Source Shutdowns.................................................................................................. 2-12

2.3.10 State Specific Control Factors........................................................................... 2-12

2.4 NONEGU POINT SOURCE QA/QC REVIEW........................................................ 2-12

2.5 NONEGU POINT SOURCE NIF AND SMOKE FILES........................................... 2-14

2.6 NONEGU POINT SOURCE EMISSION SUMMARIES ......................................... 2-14

3.0 AREA SOURCES ................................................................................................................ 3-1
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Page ii

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

3.1 INITIAL 2002 AREA SOURCE EMISSION INVENTORY...................................... 3-1

3.2 AREA SOURCE GROWTH FACTORS..................................................................... 3-2

3.2.1 EGAS 5.0 Growth Factors....................................................................................... 3-3

3.2.2 AEO2005 Growth Factors....................................................................................... 3-3

3.2.3 State Specific Growth Factors................................................................................. 3-4

3.2.3.1 Connecticut ...................................................................................................... 3-4

3.2.3.2 Delaware .......................................................................................................... 3-4

3.2.3.3 District of Columbia ........................................................................................ 3-5

3.2.3.4 Maine ............................................................................................................... 3-5

3.2.3.5 Maryland.......................................................................................................... 3-5

3.2.3.6 Massachusetts .................................................................................................. 3-5

3.2.3.7 New Hampshire ............................................................................................... 3-5

3.2.3.8 New Jersey....................................................................................................... 3-5

3.2.3.9 New York......................................................................................................... 3-5

3.2.3.10 Pennsylvania .................................................................................................... 3-6

3.2.3.11 Rhode Island .................................................................................................... 3-6

3.2.3.12 Vermont ........................................................................................................... 3-6

3.3 AREA SOURCE CONTROL FACTORS.................................................................... 3-6

3.3.1 OTC 2001 VOC Model Rules................................................................................... 3-7

3.3.2 On-Board Vapor Recovery .................................................................................... 3-10

3.3.3 Post-2002 Area Source Controls in New Jersey.................................................... 3-11

3.3.4 Residential Wood Combustion............................................................................... 3-12

3.4 AREA SOURCE QA/QC REVIEW .......................................................................... 3-12

3.5 AREA SOURCE NIF, SMOKE AND SUMMARY FILES....................................... 3-13

3.6 AREA SOURCE EMISSION SUMMARIES............................................................ 3-13

4.0 NONROAD SOURCES....................................................................................................... 4-1

4.1 NONROAD MODEL SOURCES................................................................................ 4-1

4.2 AIRCRAFT, COMMERCIAL MARINE, AND LOCOMOTIVES ............................ 4-2

4.2.1 Maryland Non-NONROAD Source Emissions......................................................... 4-3

4.2.2 DC Locomotive Emissions....................................................................................... 4-4

4.2.3 Logan (Boston) Airport Emissions .......................................................................... 4-4

4.3 NONROAD QA/QC REVIEW.................................................................................... 4-4

4.4 NONROAD NIF, SMOKE, AND SUMMARY FILES ............................................... 4-5

4.5 NONROAD EMISSION SUMMARIES ..................................................................... 4-5

5.0 BEYOND-ON-THE-WAY EMISSION INVENTORY.................................................... 5-1

5.1 NONEGU POINT SOURCES ..................................................................................... 5-2
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Page iii

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

5.1.1 Adhesives and Sealants Application ........................................................................ 5-7

5.1.2 Asphalt Production Plants....................................................................................... 5-7

5.1.3 Cement Kilns............................................................................................................ 5-8

5.1.4 Glass and Fiberglass Furnaces............................................................................... 5-8

5.1.5 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers................................................... 5-8

5.1.6 Commercial and Institutional Heating Oil ............................................................ 5-10

5.1.7 BOTW NonEGU Point Source NIF, SMOKE, and Summary Files....................... 5-10

5.1.8 BOTW NonEGU Point Source Emission Summaries............................................. 5-10

5.2 AREA SOURCES...................................................................................................... 5-19

5.2.1 Adhesives and Sealants.......................................................................................... 5-19

5.2.2 Asphalt Paving....................................................................................................... 5-23

5.2.3 Consumer Products................................................................................................ 5-23

5.2.4 Portable Fuel Containers ...................................................................................... 5-24

5.2.5 Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers.......................................................... 5-25

5.2.6 Residential and Commercial Heating Oil.............................................................. 5-26

5.2.7 BOTW Area Source NIF, SMOKE, and Summary Files........................................ 5-26

5.2.8 BOTW Area Source Emission Summaries ............................................................. 5-26

5.3 NONROAD MOBILE SOURCES...................................................................................... 5-35

5.4 ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS ................................................................................... 5-35

5.5 ONROAD MOBILE SOURCES ........................................................................................ 5-35

List of Appendices

Appendix A - NonEGU Point Source Growth Factors

Appendix B - NonEGU Point Source Control Factors

Appendix C - Area Source Growth Factors

Appendix D - Area Source Control Factors

Appendix E – BOTW NonEGU Point and Area Source Control Factors
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Page iv

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

List of Tables

Figure 1-1 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual CO Emissions

Table 1-1 Summary of MANE-VU Area, NonEGU, and Nonroad Emission Inventory by 

Pollutant, Sector, and Year

Table 2-1 NonEGU Point Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

Table 2-2 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections 

Table 2-3 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections 

Table 2-4 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections 

Table 2-5 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections 

Table 2-6 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections 

Table 2-7 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections 

Table 2-8 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections 

Table 3-1 Adoption Matrix for 2001 OTC Model Rules

Table 3-2 Rule Penetration and Control Efficiency Values for 2001 OTC Model Rule for 

PFCs

Table 3-3 Area Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

Table 3-4 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections 

Table 3-5 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections 

Table 3-6 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections 

Table 3-7 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections 

Table 3-8 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections 

Table 3-9 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections 

Table 3-10 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections 

Table 4-1 Nonroad Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

Table 4-2a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections 

Table 4-2b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections

Table 4-2c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW 

Annual CO Emission Projections

Table 4-3a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections 

Table 4-3b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections

Table 4-3c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW 

Annual NH3 Emission Projections

Table 4-4a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections 

Table 4-4b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections

Table 4-4c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW 

Annual NOx Emission Projections
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Page v

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

List of Tables (cont.)

Table 4-5a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections 

Table 4-5b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections

Table 4-5c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW 

Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections

Table 4-6a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections 

Table 4-6b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections

Table 4-6c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW 

Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections

Table 4-7a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections 

Table 4-7b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections

Table 4-7c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW 

Annual SO2 Emission Projections

Table 4-8a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections 

Table 4-8b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections

Table 4-8c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW 

Annual VOC Emission Projections

Table 5-1 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – NOx Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Table 5-2 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – NOx Emissions from ICI Boilers

Table 5-3 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – SO2 Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Table 5-4 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – VOC Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Table 5-5 BOTW NonEGU NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

Table 5-6 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual CO Emission Projections

Table 5-7 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NH3 Emission 

Projections

Table 5-8 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NOx Emission 

Projections

Table 5-9 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM10 Emission 

Projections

Table 5-10 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM2.5 Emission 

Projections

Table 5-11 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual SO2 Emission 

Projections

Table 5-12 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual VOC Emission 

Projections
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Page vi

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

List of Tables (cont.)

Table 5-13 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – NOx Emissions from Area Sources

Table 5-14 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – SO2 Emissions from Area Sources

Table 5-15 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – VOC Emissions from Area Sources

Table 5-16 BOTW Area Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

Table 5-17 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual CO Emission Projections

Table 5-18 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections

Table 5-19 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NOx Emission Projections

Table 5-20 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM10 Emission Projections

Table 5-21 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM2.5 Emission Projections

Table 5-22 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections

Table 5-23 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual VOC Emission Projections
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Page vii

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

List of Figures

Figure 1-1 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual CO Emissions

Figure 1-2 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual NH3 Emissions

Figure 1-3 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual NOx Emissions

Figure 1-4 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual SO2 Emissions

Figure 1-5 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual PM10 Emissions

Figure 1-6 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual PM2.5 Emissions

Figure 1-7 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual VOC Emissions
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Page viii

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

Acronym Description

AEO Annual Energy Outlook

BOTW Beyond-on-the-Way emission controls 

CAIR Clean Air Interstate Rule

EGAS 5.0 Economic Growth Analysis System Version 5.0

EGU Electric Generating Unit

EIA Energy Information Agency

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

IDA Inventory Data Analyzer (data format used by SMOKE modeling system)

IPM Integrated Planning Model

MANE-VU Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union

MARAMA Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association

MOBILE6 U.S. EPA’s emission model for onroad sources

NESCAUM Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management

NH3 Ammonia

NIF3.0 National Emission Inventory Input Format Version 3.0

NMIM National Mobile Inventory Model

NONROAD U.S. EPA’s emission model for certain types of nonroad equipment

NOx Oxides of nitrogen

OTB/OTW On-the-Books/On-the-Way 

OTC Ozone Transport Commission

PM10-PRI Particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter that includes both the 

filterable and condensable components of particulate matter

PM25-PRI Particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter that includes both 

the filterable and condensable components of particulate matter

SIC Standard Industrial Classification code

SIP State Implementation Plan

SCC Source Classification Code

SMOKE Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions Modeling System

SO2 Sulfur dioxide

VOC Volatile organic compounds
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 1 – Executive Summary Page 1-1

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report was prepared for the Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association 

(MARAMA) as part of an effort to assist states in developing State Implementation Plans (SIPs) 

for ozone, fine particles, and regional haze. It describes the data sources, methods, and results 

for emission forecasts for three years, three emission sectors, two emission control scenarios; 

seven pollutants, and 11 states plus the District of Columbia. The following is a summary of the 

future year inventories that were developed:

• The three projection years are 2009, 2012, and 2018. 

• The three source sectors are non-Electric Generating Units (non-EGUs), area sources, 

and nonroad mobile sources. (Note: under separate efforts, MANE-VU prepared EGU 

projections using the Integrated Planning Model {IPM} and onroad mobile source

projections using the SMOKE emission modeling system).

• The two emission control scenarios are: a) a combined “on-the-books/on-the-way”

(OTB/W) control strategy accounting for emission control regulations already in place as 

well as emission control regulations that are not yet finalized but are likely to achieve 

additional reductions by 2009; and b) a “beyond-on-the-way” (BOTW) scenarios to 

account for controls from potential new regulations that may be necessary to meet 

attainment and other regional air quality goals.

• The seven pollutants are sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), volatile organic 

compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter less than or equal to 10 

microns in diameter that includes both the filterable and condensable components of 

particulate matter (PM10-PRI), particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in 

diameter that includes both the filterable and condensable components of particulate 

matter (PM25-PRI), and ammonia (NH3).

• The states are those that comprise the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANEVU) region. In addition to the District of Columbia, the 11 MANE-VU states are 

Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, 

New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. 

The results of the emission projections are summarized in Table 1-1 and Figures 1-1 to 1-7. 

Section 2 of this report describes how the nonEGU OTB/W emission projections were made. 

Section 3 describes the methods for the area source emission projections. Section 4 describes the 

methods for the nonroad section, including sources accounted for by the NONROAD model as 

well as aircraft, locomotives, and marine vessels. Section 5 describes the development of the 

BOTW emission projections. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 1 – Executive Summary Page 1-2

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 1-1 Summary of MANE-VU Area, NonEGU, and Nonroad 

Emission Inventory by Pollutant, Sector, and Year

Annual Emissions (tons per year)

Pollutant Sector 2002 2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CO Area 1,326,796 1,283,959 1,283,959 1,260,627 1,260,627 1,211,727 1,211,727

NonEGU 295,577 328,546 328,546 346,090 346,090 412,723 412,723

Nonroad 4,553,124 4,969,925 4,969,925 5,099,538 5,099,538 5,401,353 5,401,353

6,175,497 6,582,430 6,582,430 6,706,255 6,706,255 7,025,803 7,025,803

NH3 Area 249,795 294,934 294,934 312,419 312,419 341,746 341,746

NonEGU 3,916 4,301 4,301 4,448 4,448 4,986 4,986

Nonroad 287 317 317 337 337 369 369

253,998 299,552 299,552 317,204 317,204 347,101 347,101

NOx Area 265,400 278,038 265,925 281,659 261,057 284,535 263,030

NonEGU 207,048 210,522 185,658 218,137 184,527 237,802 199,732

Nonroad 431,631 354,850 354,850 321,935 321,935 271,185 271,185

904,079 843,410 806,433 821,731 767,519 793,522 733,947

PM10 Area 1,452,309 1,527,586 1,527,586 1,556,316 1,550,400 1,614,476 1,607,602

NonEGU 51,280 55,869 55,869 57,848 57,624 63,757 63,524

Nonroad 40,114 34,453 34,453 32,445 32,445 27,059 27,059

1,543,703 1,617,908 1,617,908 1,646,609 1,640,469 1,705,292 1,698,185

PM2.5 Area 332,521 340,049 340,049 341,875 336,779 345,419 339,461

NonEGU 33,077 36,497 36,497 37,625 37,444 41,220 41,029

Nonroad 36,084 30,791 30,791 28,922 28,922 23,938 23,938

401,682 407,337 407,337 408,422 403,145 410,577 404,428

SO2 Area 286,921 304,018 304,018 305,339 202,058 305,437 190,431

NonEGU 264,377 249,658 249,658 255,596 253,638 270,433 268,330

Nonroad 57,257 15,651 15,651 8,731 8,731 8,643 8,643

608,555 569,327 569,327 569,666 464,427 584,513 467,404

VOC Area 1,528,269 1,398,982 1,363,278 1,382,803 1,339,851 1,387,882 1,334,039

NonEGU 91,278 92,279 91,718 96,887 96,260 110,524 109,762

Nonroad 572,751 460,922 460,922 424,257 424,257 380,080 380,080

2,192,298 1,952,183 1,915,918 1,903,947 1,860,368 1,878,486 1,823,881

OTB/W – on-the-books/way scenario; BOTW – beyond-on-the-way scenario
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 1 – Executive Summary Page 1-3

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Figure 1-1 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual CO Emissions

(tons per year)

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW

Tons/Year

Nonroad

NonEGU

Area

Figure 1-2 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual NH3 Emissions

(tons per year)

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

2002 2009

OTB/W

2009

BOTW

2012

OTB/W

2012

BOTW

2018

OTB/W

2018

BOTW

Tons/Year

Nonroad

NonEGU

Area
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 1 – Executive Summary Page 1-4

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Figure 1-3 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual NOx Emissions

(tons per year)

0

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW

Tons/Year

Nonroad

NonEGU

Area

Figure 1-4 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual SO2 Emissions

(tons per year)

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

2002 2009

OTB/W

2009

BOTW

2012

OTB/W

2012

BOTW

2018

OTB/W

2018

BOTW

Tons/Year

Nonroad

NonEGU

Area
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 1 – Executive Summary Page 1-5

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Figure 1-5 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual PM10 Emissions

(tons per year)

0

400,000

800,000

1,200,000

1,600,000

2,000,000

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW

Tons/Year

Nonroad

NonEGU

Area

Figure 1-6 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual PM2.5 Emissions

(tons per year)

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

2002 2009

OTB/W

2009

BOTW

2012

OTB/W

2012

BOTW

2018

OTB/W

2018

BOTW

Tons/Year

Nonroad

NonEGU

Area
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 1 – Executive Summary Page 1-6

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Figure 1-7 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual VOC Emissions

(tons per year)

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW

Tons/Year

Nonroad

NonEGU

Area
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-1

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

2.0 NONEGU POINT SOURCES

Under ideal circumstances, all stationary sources would be considered point sources for 

purposes of emission inventories. In practical applications, however, only sources that 

emit more than a specified cutoff level of pollutant are considered point sources. In

general, the MANE-VU point source inventory includes only major sources (i.e., those 

required to obtain a Title V operating permit). Some states may include additional 

stationary sources that emit below the major source thresholds.

For emission projection purposes, the point source inventory is divided into two subsectors – the Electric Generating Unit (EGU) sector and the non-EGU sector – because 

different projections methods are used for these two sectors. For EGUs, MANE-VU used 

the Integrated Planning Model (IPM) to project future generation as well as to calculate the 

impact of future control programs on future emission levels. 

The procedures for projecting emissions for non-EGUs are described in this section. We 

started with the MANE-VU 2002 point source emission inventory, which contains data for 

both EGUs and nonEGUs. We implemented a procedure to split the 2002 point source 

inventory into two components – and EGU inventory for those units accounted for in IPM, 

and a nonEGU inventory for those point sources not accounted for in IPM. For the 

nonEGU sources, we first applied growth factors to account for changes in economic 

activity. Next, we applied control factors to account for future emission reductions from 

on-the-books (OTB) control regulations and on-the-way (OTW) control regulations. The 

OTB control scenario accounts for post-2002 emission reductions from promulgated 

federal, State, local, and site-specific control programs as of June 15, 2005. The OTW 

control scenario accounts for proposed (but not final) control programs that are reasonably 

anticipated to result in post-2002 emission reductions. We then conducted a series of 

quality assurance steps to ensure the development of complete, accurate, and consistent 

emission inventories. We provided the inventories in three formats – the National 

Emission Inventory Input Format (NIF), SMOKE Inventory Data Analyzer (IDA) format, 

and SMOKE growth/control packets. We also prepared emission summary tables by state 

and pollutant. Each of these activities is discussed in this section. 

2.1 INITIAL 2002 POINT SOURCE EMISSION INVENTORY

The starting point for the nonEGU projections was Version 3 of the MANE-VU 2002 point 

source emission inventory (MANE-VU_2002_Pt_Version 3_040706.MDB). Since this 

file contains both EGUs and nonEGU point sources, and EGU emissions are projected 

using the IPM, it was necessary to split the 2002 point source file into two components. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-2

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

The first component contains those emission units accounted for in the IPM forecasts. The 

second component contains all other point sources not accounted for in IPM.

The MANE-VU 2002 point source inventory contains a cross-reference table (xwalk 

{MANE-VU}) that matches IPM emission unit identifiers (ORISPL plant code and BLRID 

emission unit code) to MANE-VU NIF emission unit identifiers (FIPSST state code, 

FIPSCNTY county code, State Plant ID, State Point ID). Initially, we used this crossreference table to split the point source file into the EGU and nonEGU components. When 

there was a match between the IPM ORISPL/BLRID and the MANE-VU emission unit ID, 

the unit was assigned to the EGU inventory; all other emission units were assigned to the 

nonEGU inventory. The exception to this rule was for the State of New York. The crossreference table only contained matches at the plant level, not the emission unit level. So 

for New York EGUs accounted for in IPM, all emission units at a plant were assigned to 

the MANE-VU EGU file (including ancillary emission units not accounted for in IPM). 

After performing this initial splitting of the MANE-VU point source inventory into EGU 

and nonEGU components, we prepared several ad-hoc QA/QC queries to verify that there 

was no double-counting of emissions in the EGU and nonEGU inventories:

• We reviewed the IPM parsed files {VISTASII_PC_1f_AllUnits_2009 (To 

Client).xls and VISTASII_PC_1f_AllUnits_2018 (To Client).xls} to identify EGUs 

accounted for in IPM. We compared this list of emission units to the nonEGU 

inventory derived from the MANE-VU cross-reference table to verify that units 

accounted for in IPM were not double-counted in the nonEGU inventory. As a 

result of this comparison, we made a few adjustments in the cross-reference table to 

add emission units for four plants to ensure these units accounted for in IPM were 

moved to the EGU inventory.

• We reviewed the nonEGU inventory to identify remaining emission units with an 

Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code of “4911 Electrical Services” or 

Source Classification Code of “1-01-xxx-xx External Combustion Boiler, Electric 

Generation”. We compared the list of sources meeting these selection criteria to 

the IPM parsed file to ensure that these units were not double-counted. 

• We compared the number of records for each NIF table in the original 2002 point 

source file to the 2002 EGU and 2002 nonEGU files. We determined that the sum 

of the number of records in the EGU file and the number of records in the nonEGU 

file equaled the number of records in the original 2002 point source file.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-3

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

• We compared the emissions by pollutant and state in the original 2002 point source 

file to the 2002 EGU file and 2002 nonEGU files. We determined that the sum of 

the emissions in the EGU file and the emissions in the nonEGU file equaled the 

emissions in the original 2002 point source file.

As a result of this procedure, we created separate sets of NIF tables for 2002 for EGUs 

(i.e., units accounted for in IPM) and nonEGUs. The nonEGU set of 2002 NIF tables were 

used in all subsequent projections for 2009/2012/2018.

After release of Version 3 of the MANE-VU 2002 inventory, New Jersey discovered that 

fugitive emissions from petroleum refineries were missing from Version 3. New Jersey 

supplied MACTEC with the emission unit identifiers for the fugitive releases, and the 

appropriate records were added to the 2002 NIF files.. MACTEC used these revised 

fugitive estimates for projecting emissions to 2009/2012/2018.

2.2 NONEGU POINT SOURCE GROWTH FACTORS

The nonEGU growth factors were developed using three sets of data:

• The U.S. EPA’s Economic Growth and Analysis System Version 5.0 (EGAS 5.0) 

using the default SCC configuration. EGAS 5.0 generates growth factors from 

REMI’s 53 Sector Policy Insight Model Version 5.5, the U.S. Department of 

Energy (DOE) Annual Energy Outlook 2004 (AEO2004) fuel use projections, and 

national vehicle mile travel projections from EPA’s MOBILE 4.1 Fuel Combustion 

Model; 

• The DOE’s Annual Energy Outlook 2005 (AEO2005) fuel consumption forecasts 

were used to replace the AEO2004 forecasts that are used as the default values in 

EGAS 5.0; and

• State-supplied population, employment, and other emission projection data.

The priority for applying these growth factors was to first use the state-supplied projection 

data (if available). If no state-supplied data are available, then we used the AEO2005 

projection factors for fuel consumption sources. If data from these two sources were not 

available, we used the EGAS 5.0 default SCC configuration. Appendix A lists the

nonEGU point source growth factors used for this study.

2.2.1 EGAS 5.0 Growth Factors

EGAS is an EPA-developed economic and activity forecast tool that provides credible 

growth factors for developing emission inventory projections. Growth factors are 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-4

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

generated using national- and regional-economic forecasts. For nonEGUs, the primary 

economic activity data sets in EGAS 5.0 are:

• State-specific growth rates from the Regional Economic Model, Inc. (REMI) 

Policy Insight® model, version 5.5. The REMI socioeconomic data (output by 

industry sector, population, farm sector value added, and gasoline and oil 

expenditures) are available by 4-digit SIC code at the State level. 

• Energy consumption data from the DOE’s Energy Information Administration’s 

(EIA) Annual Energy Outlook 2004, with Projections through 2025 for use in 

generating growth factors for non-EGU fuel combustion sources. These data 

include regional or national fuel-use forecast data that were mapped to specific 

SCCs for the non-EGU fuel use sectors (e.g., commercial coal, industrial natural 

gas). Growth factors are reported at the Census division level. These Census 

divisions represent a group of States (e.g., the South Atlantic division includes 

Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Maryland; the Middle Atlantic division 

includes New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania; the New England division 

includes Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and 

Vermont). Although one might expect different growth rates in each of these 

States due to unique demographic and socioeconomic trends, all States within each 

division received the same growth rate.

EGAS uses these economic activity datasets and a set of cross-reference files to generate 

growth factors by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code, Source Classification 

Code (SCC), or Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) codes. Growth 

factors for 2009, 2012, and 2018 were calculated using 2002 as the base year at the State 

and SCC level. County-specific growth factors are not available in EGAS 5.0.

There were several SCCs in the MANE-VU 2002 inventory that are not included in the 

EGAS 5.0 files. As a result, EGAS did not generate growth factors for those SCCs. 

MACTEC assigned growth factors for the missing SCCs by assigning a surrogate SCC that 

best represented the missing SCC. 

2.2.2 AEO2005 Growth Factors

The default version of EGAS 5.0 uses the DOE’s AEO2004 forecasts. We replaced these 

data with the more recent AEO2005 forecasts to improve the emissions growth factors 

produced. Using ACCESS, we created a copy of the “DOE EGAS 5” dataset. The dataset 

includes three tables. One table contains the projection data values from 2001-2025. The 

other two tables are the MACT and SCC crosswalk tables. The crosswalk tables are linked 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-5

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

to the projection table via a “model code”. Using the copy of AEO2004 data, we updated 

the corresponding projection tables with data from the AEO2005 located at: 

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/supplement/supref.html . Using the data and descriptions from 

the new tables, we matched the projection data to the appropriate model codes and then 

built a table identical to the DOE EGAS 5 dataset with the new 2005 AEO data. The 

resulting ACCESS dataset contains a projection data table with the exact same structure as 

the original except with the new data. The SCC and MACT crosswalks did not require any 

updates since the model code assignments were not changed in the new data table.

2.2.3 State Specific Growth Factors

In addition to the growth data described above, we received growth projections from 

several MANE-VU states to be used instead of the default EGAS or AEO2005 growth 

factors. The following paragraphs describe the growth factors used for each state. 

2.2.3.1 Connecticut

Connecticut provided state-level employment-based growth factors for various SIC 

categories derived from CT Department of Labor (CTDOL) projections. For many 

manufacturing sectors, employment is projected to decline, indicating the likelihood of 

reduced activity levels and emissions for those sectors. Associated growth factors are less 

than one. To ensure consistency within a facility, CTDEP indicated that the employmentbased growth factors be used wherever possible, as matched by SIC. MACTEC used the 

growth factors by SIC code for all sources in CT, including those fuel combustion sources 

that would otherwise have been projected using the AEO2005 forecasts.

2.2.3.2 Delaware

Delaware provided state-level employment data from the Department of Labor by NAICS 

codes for 2002 and 2012. We used these data to calculate the growth factor from 2002 to 

2012 and interpolated these data to derive growth factors for 2009 and 2018. We matched 

these industry NAICS groupings to SCC codes in order to create SCC specific growth 

factors for non-EGU point sources.

2.2.3.3 District of Columbia

DC indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the enhancement 

of using the DOE’s 2005 Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion sources. 

2.2.3.4 Maine

Maine indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors and the DOE’s 2005 

Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion sources. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-6

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

2.2.3.5 Maryland

Maryland provided growth factors by SCC for all counties in the State. These growth 

factors were derived from a variety source sources, including the MWCOG Cooperative 

Forecast 7.0, the BMC Round 6A Cooperative Forecast (prepared by the MD Dept. of 

Planning, May 2004), and EGAS 5.0. 

2.2.3.6 Massachusetts

Massachusetts also provided a link to employment projections for 2000-2010 for very 

narrow occupational categories that are not directly correlated with SIC or SCC codes. 

Since we could not match the occupational titles in the Massachusetts employment 

projections with SIC or SCC codes, MACTEC used the EGAS 5.0 growth factors (with the 

AEO2005 enhancement for combustion sources) for projecting emissions from nonEGU 

sources. 

2.2.3.7 New Hampshire

New Hampshire indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the 

enhancement of using the DOE’s 2005 Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion 

sources. 

2.2.3.8 New Jersey

New Jersey indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the 

enhancement of using the DOE’s 2005 Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion 

sources. 

2.2.3.9 New York

New York provided county-level employment data for 12 counties in the New York City 

metro area for 2002, 2009, 2012, and 2018. The employment projections are for broad 

industry categories not directly correlated with SIC or SCC codes. Since we could not 

match the 12-county employment projections with SIC or SCC codes, MACTEC used the 

EGAS 5.0 growth factors (with the AEO2005 enhancement for combustion sources) for 

projecting emissions from nonEGU sources for both the 12-county area and all other 

counties in the state. 

2.2.3.10 Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania provided total employment projections for a subset of counties. These 

employment projections do not have enough detail regarding specific industrial groupings 

to be correlated with SIC or SCC codes. MACTEC used the EGAS 5.0 growth factors 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-7

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

(with the AEO2005 enhancement for combustion sources) for projecting emissions from 

nonEGU sources

2.2.3.11 Rhode Island

Rhode Island provided state-level employment data from the Department of Labor and 

Training by 3-digit NAICS codes for 2002 and 2012. We used these data to calculate the 

growth factor from 2002 to 2012 and interpolated these data to derive growth factors for 

2009 and 2018. We matched these industry NAICS groupings to SCC codes in order to 

create SCC specific growth factors for non-EGU point sources.

2.2.3.12 Vermont

Vermont indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the 

enhancement of using the DOE’s 2005 Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion 

sources.

2.3 NONEGU POINT SOURCE CONTROL FACTORS

The following sections document how the OTB/OTW control factors were developed for 

the MANE-VU future year inventories. We developed control factors to estimate emission 

reductions that will result from on-the-books regulations that will result in post-2002 

emission reductions and proposed regulations or actions that will result in post-2002 

emission reductions. Control factors were developed for the following national, regional, 

or state control measures:

• NOx SIP Call Phase I (NOx Budget Trading Program)

• NOx SIP Call Phase II 

• NOx RACT in 1-hour Ozone SIPs

• NOx OTC 2001 Model Rule for ICI Boilers

• 2-, 4-, 7-, and 10-year MACT Standards 

• Combustion Turbine and RICE MACT 

• Industrial Boiler/Process Heater MACT 

• Refinery Enforcement Initiative

• Source Shutdowns

In addition, states provided specific control measure information about specific sources or 

regulatory programs in their state. We used the state-specific data to the extent it was 

available.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-8

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

2.3.1 NOx SIP Call Phase I

Compliance with the NOx SIP Call in the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) states was 

scheduled for May 1, 2003. The requirements applied to all MANE-VU states except 

Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. While the program applies primarily to electric 

generating units (EGUs), the NOx SIP Call applies to non-EGUs such as large industrial 

boilers and turbines. The NOx SIP Call did not mandate which sources must reduce 

emissions; rather, it required states to meet an overall emission budget and gave them 

flexibility to develop control strategies to meet that budget. All states in the MANE-VU 

region affected by the NOx SIP Call chose to meet their NOx SIP Call requirements by 

participating in the NOx Budget Trading Program. We reviewed the available state rules 

and guidance documents to determine the affected nonEGU sources and ozone season NOx 

allowances for each source. Future year emissions for non-EGU boilers/turbines were 

capped at the allowance levels. Since the allowances are given in terms of tons per ozone 

season (5 months May to September), we calculated annual emissions by multiplying the 

ozone season allowances by a factor of 12 (annual) / 5 (ozone season). Table B-1 

identifies those units included in the NOx SIP Call Phase I budget program.

Cement kilns were also included in Phase I of the NOx

2.3.2 NOx SIP Call Phase II

SIP call. There is a cement kiln in 

Maine, but it is not subject to the NOx SIP call. For the cement kilns in Maryland and 

New York, a default control efficiency value of 25 percent was applied. For the cement 

kilns in Pennsylvania, the state provided their best estimates of the actual control 

efficiency expected for each kiln after the NOx SIP Call. Table B-2 identifies the cement 

kilns affected by the NOx SIP Call.

The final Phase II NOx SIP Call rule was promulgated on April 21, 2004. States had until 

April 21, 2005, to submit SIPs meeting the Phase II NOx budget requirements. The Phase 

II rule applies to large IC engines, which are primarily used in pipeline transmission 

service at compressor stations. We have identified affected units using the same 

methodology as was used by EPA in the proposed Phase II rule (i.e., a large IC engine is 

one that emitted, on average, more than 1 ton per day during 2002). The final rule reflects 

a control level of 82 percent for natural gas-fired IC engines and 90 percent for diesel or 

dual fuel categories. Pennsylvania identified large IC engines affected by the rule. Table 

B-3 identifies those units included in the NOx SIP Call Phase II. 

2.3.3 NOx RACT in 1-hour Ozone SIPs

Emission reductions requirements from NOx reasonably available control technology 

(RACT) requirements in 1-hour Ozone SIP areas were implemented in or prior to 2002. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-9

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

These reductions should already be accounted for in the MANE-VU 2002 inventory since 

the 2002 inventory was based on 2002 actual emissions which includes any reductions due 

to NOx RACT. 

2.3.4 NOx OTC 2001 Model Rule for ICI Boilers

The Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) developed control measures for industrial, 

commercial, and institutional (ICI) boilers in 2001. Information about the proposed OTC 

NOx emission limits by fuel type and size range was obtained from Table III-1 of Control 

Measure Development Support Analysis of Ozone Transport Commission Model Rules

(E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., March 31, 2001). Information about the emission limits 

contained in the existing state rules (prior to adoption of the OTC 2001 model rule) were 

obtained from Tables III-2 through III-9 of the Pechan document. Information about the 

emission limits contained in the current state rules (as they existed in June 2006) were 

obtained from the individual states regulations. The percent reduction for ICI boilers was 

estimated by state, fuel type, and size range by comparing the current state emission limits 

(as they existed in June 2006) with the state emission limits as they existed in 2001. 

Pennsylvania adopted the OTC 2001 model rule in five southeastern counties (Bucks, 

Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia) for boilers in the 100 to 250 million 

Btu/hour range. New Jersey adopted the OTC 2001 model rule for natural gas-fired boilers 

with a maximum heat rate of at least 100 million Btu/hour. For other states, it did not 

appear that the emission limits in 2006 had changed from the emission limits in 2001.

2.3.5 2-, 4-, 7-, and 10-year MACT Standards

Maximum achievable control technology (MACT) requirements were also applied, as 

documented in the report entitled Control Packet Development and Data Sources, dated 

July 14, 2004 (available at http://www.epa.gov/air/interstateairquality/pdfs/NonEGU_nonpoint_Control_Development.pdf ). The point source MACTs and associated 

emission reductions were designed from Federal Register (FR) notices and discussions 

with EPA’s Emission Standards Division (ESD) staff. These MACT requirements apply 

only to units located at a major source of hazardous air pollutants (HAP). We did not 

apply reductions for MACT standards with an initial compliance date of 2002 or earlier, 

assuming that the effects of these controls are already accounted for in the inventories 

supplied by the States. Emission reductions were applied only for MACT standards with 

an initial compliance date of 2003 or greater. 

Because the MANE-VU inventory does not identify HAP major sources, the reductions 

from post-2002 MACT standards were applied on a more general scale to all sources with 

certain SCCs. Every source with an SCC determined to be affected by a post-2002 MACT 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-10

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

standard was assigned an incremental percent reduction for the applicable MACT standard. 

Table B-4 shows the SCCs affected and the incremental control efficiencies applied for 

post-2002 MACT standards.

2.3.6 Combustion Turbine and RICE MACT

The MANE-VU projection inventory does not include the NOx co-benefit effects of the 

MACT regulations for Gas Turbines or stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion 

Engines, which EPA estimates to be small compared to the overall inventory.

2.3.7 Industrial Boiler/Process Heater MACT

EPA anticipates ancillary reductions in PM and SO2 as a result of the Industrial 

Boiler/Process Heater MACT standard. The MACT applies to industrial, commercial, and 

institutional units firing solid fuel (coal, wood, waste, biomass) which have a design 

capacity greater than 10 mmBtu/hr and are located at a major source of hazardous air 

pollutants (HAP). The boiler design capacity field in many cases was missing from the 

MANE-VU emission inventory. In lieu of boiler design capacity, we identified boilers 

with the following SCCs that emitted greater than 10 tons/year of either SO2 or PM10

• 1-02-001-xx Industrial, Anthracite Coal

• 1-02-002-xx Industrial, Bituminous/subbituminous Coal

• 1-02-008-xx Industrial, Petroleum Coke

• 1-02-009-xx Industrial, Wood/Bark Waste

• 1-03-001-xx Commercial/Institutional, Anthracite Coal

• 1-03-002-xx Commercial/Institutional, Bituminous/subbituminous Coal

• 1-03-009-xx Commercial/Institutional, Wood/Bark Waste

• 3-90-002-89 In-Process Fuel Use, Bituminous Coal

• 3-90-002-99 In-Process Fuel Use, Bituminous Coal

• 3-90-008-89 In-Process Fuel Use, Coke

• 3-90-008-99 In-Process Fuel Use, Coke

• 3-90-009-99 In-Process Fuel Use, Wood

For these sources, we applied the average MACT control efficiencies of 4% for SO2 and 

40% for PM.

2.3.8 Refinery Enforcement Initiative

Both EPA and State/local agencies have negotiated (or are in the process of negotiating) 

Consent Decrees that will require significant investment in pollution control technology 

and will result in significant emission reductions in the future. There are eight refineries in 

the MANE-VU inventory impacted by the settlements. The five major refinery processes 

that are affected by the judicial settlements are:
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-11

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

• Fluid Catalytic Cracking Units (FCCUs) and Fluid Coking Units (FCUs)

• Process Heaters and Boilers

• Flare Gas Recovery

• Leak Detection and Repair

• Benzene/Wastewater

As part of the development of the Assessment of Control Technology Options for 

Petroleum Refineries in the Mid-Atlantic Region (Draft Final, October 2006), MACTEC 

coordinated with State and local agencies to develop estimates of future year emissions 

based upon the settlements and recent permits that implement the provisions of those 

settlements.

For FCCUs/FCUs, the Consent Decree control requirements generally require the 

installation of wet gas scrubbers for SO2 control. Some of the units have already been 

permitted to include the control requirements. In those cases, specific emission limits for 

SO2 have already been established and were used as the best estimate of emission in 2009. 

In cases where specific emission limitation have not yet been specified in permits, a 90 

percent SO2 control efficiency was assumed as a conservative estimate of the SO2 

reductions from the installation of a wet gas scrubber. 

For NOx control at FCCUs/FCUs, the Consent Decrees require selective catalytic 

reduction (SCR), selective non-catalytic reduction (SCNR), or optimization studies to 

reduce NOx emissions. Some of the units have already been permitted to include the 

control requirements. In those cases, specific emission limits for NOx have already been 

established and were used as the best estimate of emission in 2009. In cases where specific 

emission limitation have not yet been specified in permits, a 90 percent NOx control 

efficiency was assumed for SCR, and a 60 percent reduction was assumed from the 

installation of SNCR.

For SO2 emissions from boilers/heaters, the control requirements generally require the 

elimination of burning solid/liquid fuels. We identified all boilers and heaters at the eight 

affected refineries that burn solid or liquid fuels. For these units, we set the SO2 emissions 

to zero in the future year inventories. 

For NOx emissions from boilers/heaters, control requirements generally apply to units 

greater than 40 million British thermal units (MMBtu) per hour capacity or larger. In 

many cases, the consent decrees establish NOx emission reduction objectives across a 

number of refineries that are owned by the same firm. Therefore, the companies have 

some discretion in deciding which individual boilers/heaters to control as well as the 

control techniques to apply. Also, the consent decrees have various phase-in dates which 

make it difficult to determine the exact date when the reductions will be fully realized. As 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-12

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

part of the development of the Assessment of Control Technology Options for Petroleum 

Refineries in the Mid-Atlantic Region (Draft Final, October 2006), MACTEC coordinated 

with State and local agencies to develop estimates of future year emissions based upon the 

settlements and recent permits that implement the provisions of those settlements. 

Heater/boiler NOx controls for the units to which they are applied were determined to be

equivalent to meeting a 0.04 lbs per million Btu NOx emission rate. Meeting this emission

reduction requirement is expected to provide an average NOx emission reduction of 50 

percent from 2002 levels in 2009.

The Consent Decrees also included enhanced LDAR programs (e.g., reducing the defined 

leak concentration, increasing the monitoring frequency, other requirements. Our best 

estimate is a 50% reduction in VOC emissions as a result of implementing enhanced 

LDAR programs similar to those required in the recent Consent Decrees. This is based on 

a study (http://www.rti.org/pubs/ertc_enviro_2002_final1.pdf ) that estimated an enhanced 

LDAR program could result in a 50% reduction in fugitive VOCs. 

The settlements are expected to produce additional SO2, NOx, and VOC emission 

reductions for flare gas recovery and wastewater operations. These emission reductions 

were not quantified as they are expected to produce less significant changes in the MANEVU inventory because of the magnitude and uncertainty associated with the emissions 

from these units in the 2002 MANE-VU inventory.

2.3.9 Source Shutdowns

A few states indicated that significant source shutdowns have occurred since 2002 and that 

emissions from these sources should not be included in the future year inventories. These 

sources are identified in Table B-5. 

2.3.10 State Specific Control Factors

Delaware provided reductions expected from the Maritrans lightering operation. VOC 

emissions are projected to be reduced by 34.8% by 2009, 69.3% by 2012, and 79.2% by 

2018.

2.4 NONEGU POINT SOURCE QA/QC REVIEW

Throughout the inventory development process, quality assurance steps were performed to 

ensure that no double counting of emissions occurred, and to ensure that a full and 

complete inventory was developed. Quality assurance was an important component to the 

inventory development process and MACTEC performed the following QA steps on the 

nonEGU point source component of the MANE-VU future year inventories:
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-13

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

1. State agencies reviewed the draft growth and control factors in the summer of 

2005. Changes based on these comments were implemented in the files.

2. Compared, at the emission unit-level, emissions from the IPM parsed files and 

the MANE-VU NIF files to verify that the splitting of the MANE-VU point 

source inventory into the EGU and nonEGU sectors did not result in any double 

county of emissions or cause units to be missing from both inventories.

3. SCC level emission summaries were prepared and evaluated to ensure that 

emissions were consistent and that there were no missing sources. Tier 

comparisons (by pollutant) were developed between the revised 2002 base year 

inventory and the 2009/2012/2018 projection inventories.

4. State level emission summaries were prepared and evaluated to ensure that 

emissions were consistent and reasonable. The summaries included base year 

2002 emissions, 2009/2012/2018 projected emissions accounting only for 

growth, 2009/2012/2018 projected emissions accounting for both growth and 

emission reductions from OTB and OTW controls.

5. Emission inventory files in NIF format were provided for state agency review 

and comment. Changes based on these comments were implemented.

6. All final files were run through EPA’s Format and Content checking software.

7. Version numbering was used for all inventory files developed. The version 

numbering process used a decimal system to track major and minor changes. 

For example, a major change would result in a version going from 1.0 to 2.0 for 

example. A minor change would cause a version number to go from 1.0 to 1.1. 

Minor changes resulting from largely editorial changes would result in a change 

from 1.00 to 1.01 for example.

Final QA checks were run on the revised projection inventory data set to ensure that all 

corrections provided by the S/L agencies and stakeholders were correctly incorporated into

the S/L inventories and that there were no remaining QA issues that could be addressed 

during the duration of the project. After exporting the inventory to ASCII text files in NIF 

3.0, the EPA QA program was run on the ASCII files and the QA output was reviewed to 

verify that all QA issues that could be addressed were resolved
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-14

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

2.5 NONEGU POINT SOURCE NIF AND SMOKE FILES

The Version 3 file names and descriptions delivered to MARAMA are shown in Table 2-1.

2.6 NONEGU POINT SOURCE EMISSION SUMMARIES

Emission summaries by state, year, and pollutant are presented in Tables 2-2 through 2-8

for CO, NH3, NOx, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, SO2, and VOC, respectively. 

Table 2-1 NonEGU Point Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

File Name Date Description

MANEVU_OTB2009_NonEGU_NIFV3_1.mdb Dec. 4, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2009 OTB 

NonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU_OTB2012_NonEGU_NIFV3_1.mdb Dec. 4, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2012 OTB 

NonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU_OTB2018_NonEGU_NIFV3_1.mdb Dec. 4, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2018 OTB 

NonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU_OTB2009_NonEGU_IDAV3_1.txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2009 OTB 

NonEGU source inventory in 

SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU_OTB2012_NonEGU_IDAV3_1.txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2012 OTB 

NonEGU source inventory in 

SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU_OTB2018_NonEGU_IDA3V_2.txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2018 OTB 

NonEGU source inventory in 

SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU OTB BOTW NonEGU V3_1 State 

Summary.xls

Nov. 22, 2006 Spreadsheet with state totals by 

pollutant for all NonEGU 

sources 

MANEVU OTB BOTW NonEGU V3_1 State SCC 

Summary.xls

Dec. 4, 2006 Spreadsheet with SCC totals by 

state and pollutant for all 

NonEGU sources.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-15

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 2-2 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 2,157 2,251 2,306 2,415

DE 8,812 9,037 8,748 8,651

DC 247 283 299 327

ME 9,043 10,147 10,467 11,433

MD 94,536 104,012 111,174 141,342

MA 10,793 12,027 12,552 13,426

NH 774 858 871 907

NJ 8,209 10,076 10,806 12,244

NY 53,259 61,411 65,541 78,876

PA 105,815 116,430 121,251 140,909

RI 1,712 1,764 1,821 1,927

VT 220 250 254 267

Total 295,577 328,546 346,090 412,724

0

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

125,000

150,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-16

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 2-3 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 0 0 0 0

DE 153 145 138 134

DC 4 5 5 5

ME 700 796 809 859

MD 305 347 366 410

MA 462 510 521 563

NH 37 46 50 60

NJ 0 0 0 0

NY 1,027 1,081 1,128 1,296

PA 1,170 1,307 1,363 1,591

RI 58 64 68 68

VT 0 0 0 0

Total 3,916 4,301 4,448 4,986

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-17

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 2-4 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 6,773 7,236 7,465 7,921

DE 4,372 4,076 4,135 4,246

DC 480 548 577 627

ME 12,108 14,285 14,661 15,753

MD 21,940 19,401 20,399 22,797

MA 18,292 20,603 21,372 23,040

NH 1,188 1,384 1,394 1,435

NJ 15,812 16,498 17,091 18,805

NY 34,253 33,648 34,586 37,133

PA 89,136 89,932 93,526 103,137

RI 2,308 2,449 2,471 2,442

VT 386 462 460 466

Total 207,048 210,522 218,137 237,802

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-18

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 2-5 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 990 1,035 1,058 1,106

DE 1,820 1,486 1,475 1,487

DC 157 178 186 198

ME 6,120 7,088 7,133 7,496

MD 4,739 4,797 5,040 5,828

MA 4,212 5,006 5,088 5,314

NH 918 1,084 1,097 1,129

NJ 3,439 4,205 4,417 4,959

NY 5,072 5,221 5,444 6,098

PA 23,282 25,169 26,307 29,516

RI 296 333 331 330

VT 235 267 272 296

Total 51,280 55,869 57,848 63,757

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-19

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 2-6 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 822 871 894 939

DE 1,606 1,256 1,245 1,254

DC 128 145 152 164

ME 4,899 5,675 5,690 5,935

MD 2,772 2,861 3,011 3,503

MA 2,953 3,554 3,574 3,660

NH 857 1,008 1,021 1,052

NJ 2,947 3,588 3,764 4,234

NY 3,355 3,535 3,688 4,161

PA 12,360 13,578 14,159 15,878

RI 180 200 198 194

VT 198 226 229 246

Total 33,077 36,497 37,625 41,220

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-20

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 2-7 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 2,438 2,528 2,567 2,644

DE 35,706 7,117 7,401 7,610

DC 618 707 735 780

ME 14,412 18,656 18,492 18,794

MD 34,193 34,223 35,373 38,921

MA 14,766 18,185 18,442 18,955

NH 2,436 3,099 3,098 3,114

NJ 9,797 7,141 7,234 7,856

NY 58,227 62,922 64,484 67,545

PA 88,259 90,735 93,441 99,924

RI 2,651 3,163 3,182 3,164

VT 874 1,182 1,147 1,127

Total 264,377 249,658 255,596 270,434

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 2 – NonEGU Point Sources Page 2-21

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 2-8 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 4,604 4,114 4,152 4,230

DE 4,645 2,987 2,311 1,993

DC 69 72 75 85

ME 4,477 4,740 4,985 5,709

MD 5,676 5,297 5,578 6,301

MA 7,794 8,381 9,061 10,564

NH 1,459 1,060 1,132 1,294

NJ 13,318 16,702 17,621 19,915

NY 9,933 10,157 10,750 12,354

PA 36,326 35,875 38,162 44,537

RI 1,898 1,640 1,695 1,812

VT 1,079 1,254 1,365 1,730

Total 91,278 92,279 96,887 110,524

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-1

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

3.0 AREA SOURCES

The area source sector is comprised of stationary sources that are small and numerous, and 

that have not been inventoried individually as specific point, mobile, or biogenic sources. 

Individual sources are typically grouped with other like sources into area source categories 

and the emissions are calculated on a county-by-county basis. Area source categories 

include residential/commercial/industrial fuel combustion; small industrial processes; 

solvent utilization (such as architectural coatings and consumer products); petroleum 

product storage and transport (such as gasoline service stations); waste disposal; and 

agricultural activities. 

The procedures for projecting emissions for area sources are described in this section. We 

started with the MANE-VU 2002 area source emission inventory. We first applied growth 

factors to account for changes in population and economic activity. Next, we applied 

control factors to account for future emission reductions from on-the-books (OTB) control 

regulations and on-the-way (OTW) control regulations. The OTB control scenario 

accounts for post-2002 emission reductions from promulgated federal, State, local, and 

site-specific control programs as of June 15, 2005. The OTW control scenario accounts for 

proposed (but not final) control programs that are reasonably anticipated to result in post2002 emission reductions. We then conducted a series of quality assurance steps to ensure 

the development of complete, accurate, and consistent emission inventories. We provided 

the inventories in three formats – the National Emission Inventory Input Format (NIF), 

SMOKE Inventory Data Analyzer (IDA) format, and SMOKE growth/control packets. We 

also prepared emission summary tables by state and pollutant. Each of these activities is 

discussed in this section. 

3.1 INITIAL 2002 AREA SOURCE EMISSION INVENTORY

The starting point for the area source projections was Version 3 of the MANE-VU 2002 

area source emission inventory (MANE-VU_2002_Area_040606.MDB). There were two 

updates to this version of the 2002 inventory in response to requests from the District of 

Columbia and Massachusetts. These changes, described in the following paragraphs, were 

used in preparing the 2009/2012/2018 projections.

After release of Version 3 of the MANE-VU 2002 inventory, the District of Columbia 

discovered a gross error in the 2002 residential, non-residential and roadway construction. 

They requested that the following values be used for the 2002 base year and as the basis 

for the 2009/2012/2018 projections:
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-2

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC Pollutant Code 2002 Annual 

Emissions (tpy)

2311010000 PM10-PRI 8.2933

PM25-PRI 1.6587

2311020000 PM10-PRI 486.1951

PM25-PRI 97.239

2311030000 PM10-PRI 289.8579

PM25-PRI 57.9716

After release of Version 3 of the MANE-VU 2002 inventory, Massachusetts revised their 

inventory of area source heating oil emissions due to two changes: (1) SO2 emission 

factors were adjusted for the sulfur content from 1.0 to 0.03; and (2) use of the latest DOEEIA 2002 fuel use data instead of the previous version used 2001. These two changes 

significantly altered the 2002 SO2 emissions for area source heating oil combustion. 

Massachusetts provided revised 2002 PE and EM tables, which MACTEC used in 

preparing the 2009/2012/2018 projection inventories.

3.2 AREA SOURCE GROWTH FACTORS

The area source growth factors were developed using three sets of data:

• The U.S. EPA’s Economic Growth and Analysis System Version 5.0 (EGAS 5.0) 

using the default SCC configuration. EGAS 5.0 generates growth factors from 

REMI’s 53 Sector Policy Insight Model Version 5.5, the U.S. Department of 

Energy (DOE) Annual Energy Outlook 2004 (AEO2004) fuel use projections, and 

national vehicle mile travel projections from EPA’s MOBILE 4.1 Fuel Combustion 

Model; 

• The DOE’s Annual Energy Outlook 2005 (AEO2005) fuel consumption forecasts 

were used to replace the AEO2004 forecasts that are used as the default values in 

EGAS 5.0; and

• State-supplied population, employment, and other emission projection data.

The priority for applying these growth factors was to first use the state-supplied projection 

data (if available). If no state-supplied data are available, then we used the AEO2005 

projection factors for fuel consumption sources. If data from these two sources were not 

available, we used the EGAS 5.0 default SCC configuration. Appendix C lists the area 

source growth factors used for this study.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-3

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

3.2.1 EGAS 5.0 Growth Factors

EGAS is an EPA-developed economic and activity forecast tool that provides credible 

growth factors for developing emission inventory projections. Growth factors are 

generated using national- and regional-economic forecasts. For nonEGUs, the primary 

economic activity data sets in EGAS 5.0 are:

• State-specific growth rates from the Regional Economic Model, Inc. (REMI) 

Policy Insight® model, version 5.5. The REMI socioeconomic data (output by 

industry sector, population, farm sector value added, and gasoline and oil 

expenditures) are available by 4-digit SIC code at the State level. 

• Energy consumption data from the DOE’s Energy Information Administration’s 

(EIA) Annual Energy Outlook 2004, with Projections through 2025 for use in 

generating growth factors for non-EGU fuel combustion sources. These data 

include regional or national fuel-use forecast data that were mapped to specific 

SCCs for the non-EGU fuel use sectors (e.g., commercial coal, industrial natural 

gas). Growth factors are reported at the Census division level. These Census 

divisions represent a group of States (e.g., the South Atlantic division includes 

Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Maryland; the Middle Atlantic division 

includes New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania; the New England division 

includes Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and 

Vermont). Although one might expect different growth rates in each of these 

States due to unique demographic and socioeconomic trends, all States within each 

division received the same growth rate.

EGAS uses these economic activity datasets and a set of cross-reference files to generate 

growth factors by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code, Source Classification 

Code (SCC), or Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) codes. Growth 

factors for 2009, 2012, and 2018 were calculated using 2002 as the base year at the State 

and SCC level. County-specific growth factors are not available in EGAS 5.0.

There were several SCCs in the MANE-VU 2002 inventory that are not included in the 

EGAS 5.0 files. As a result, EGAS did not generate growth factors for those SCCs. 

MACTEC assigned growth factors for the missing SCCs by assigning a surrogate SCC that 

best represented the missing SCC. 

3.2.2 AEO2005 Growth Factors

The default version of EGAS 5.0 uses the DOE’s AEO2004 forecasts. We replaced these 

data with the more recent AEO2005 forecasts to improve the emissions growth factors 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-4

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

produced. Using ACCESS, we created a copy of the “DOE EGAS 5” dataset. The dataset 

includes three tables. One table contains the projection data values from 2001-2025. The 

other two tables are the MACT and SCC crosswalk tables. The crosswalk tables are linked 

to the projection table via a “model code”. Using the copy of AEO2004 data, we updated 

the corresponding projection tables with data from the AEO2005 located at: 

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/supplement/supref.html . Using the data and descriptions from

the new tables, we matched the projection data to the appropriate model codes and then 

built a table identical to the DOE EGAS 5 dataset with the new 2005 AEO data. The 

resulting ACCESS dataset contains a projection data table with the exact same structure as 

the original except with the new data. The SCC and MACT crosswalks did not require any 

updates since the model code assignments were not changed in the new data table.

3.2.3 State Specific Growth Factors

In addition to the growth data described above, we received growth projections from 

several MANE-VU states to be used instead of the default EGAS or AEO2005 growth 

factors. The following paragraphs describe the area source growth factors used for each 

state. 

3.2.3.1 Connecticut

Connecticut provided state-level population projections for 2009, 2012, and 2018. We 

created growth factors for those SCCs that are population based using the state-supplied 

data. Connecticut also provided state-level employment projections for industry categories 

analogous to 2-digit SIC codes. Projections were provided for 2009, 2012, and 2018. We 

matched these industry groupings to SCC codes in order to create SCC specific growth 

factors for area sources. Emissions from area source fuel combustion were projected using 

the AEO2005 forecasts.

3.2.3.2 Delaware

Delaware provided county-level population projections (Delaware Population Consortium Annual 

Population Projections, Oct 18, 2001 Version 2001.0) for 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020. We 

interpolated these data to get growth factors for projection from 2002 to 2009, 2012, and 2018 for 

those SCCs that are population based. Delaware also provided state-level employment data by 

NAICS codes for 2002 and 2012. We interpolated values for 2009 and 2018. We matched these 

industry groupings to SCC codes in order to create SCC specific growth factors for selected area 

sources. Emissions from area source fuel combustion were projected using the AEO2005 

forecasts.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-5

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

3.2.3.3 District of Columbia

DC provided local growth factors for projecting emissions from 2002 to 2009, 2012, and 

2018 for all area source SCCs except fuel combustion sources. Emissions from area 

source fuel combustion were projected using the AEO2005 forecasts.

3.2.3.4 Maine

Maine indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors and the DOE’s 2005 

Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion sources. 

3.2.3.5 Maryland

Maryland provided growth factors by SCC for all counties in the State. These growth 

factors were derived from a variety source sources, including the MWCOG Cooperative 

Forecast 7.0, the BMC Round 6A Cooperative Forecast (prepared by the MD Dept. of 

Planning, May 2004), and EGAS 5.0. 

3.2.3.6 Massachusetts

Massachusetts provided county-level population data for the years 2000, 2010, and 2020. 

We interpolated these data to get growth factors for projection from 2002 to 2009, 2012, 

and 2018 for those SCCs that are population based. Massachusetts also provided growth 

factors for several SCCs based on employment data for the years 2000 and 2010. We 

interpolated these data to get growth factors for projection from 2002 to 2009, 2012, and 

2018. Massachusetts agreed on the use of the AEO2005 forecasts for projecting emissions 

from area source fuel combustion. 

3.2.3.7 New Hampshire

New Hampshire agreed to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the enhancement of 

using the DOE’s 2005 Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion sources. 

3.2.3.8 New Jersey

New Jersey provided growth factors for most SCCs for all counties in the State. When 

state-specific growth factors were not available, we used the AEO2005 forecasts for 

projecting emissions from area source fuel combustion and EGAS default factors for any 

remaining categories. 

3.2.3.9 New York

New York provided county-level population data for 2002 and projections/growth factors for 2009, 

2012, and 2018. We used these growth factors for those SCCs that are population based. We used 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-6

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

the AEO2005 forecasts for projecting emissions from area source fuel combustion and 

EGAS default factors for any remaining categories. 

3.2.3.10 Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania provided county-level population data for 2000 and projections for 2010 and 

2020. We interpolated these data to get growth factors for projecting from 2002 to 2009, 

2012, and 2018 for those SCCs that are population based. Pennsylvania also provided 

general employment data for 21 counties or area for 2000 and projections for 2010 and 

2020. We interpolated these data to get growth factors for projecting from 2002 to 2009, 

2012, and 2018 for nine area source categories identified by Pennsylvania. For all other 

area source categories, we used the AEO2005 forecasts for projecting emissions from area 

source fuel combustion and EGAS default factors for any remaining categories. 

3.2.3.11 Rhode Island

Rhode Island provided county-level population projections for 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 

and 2020. We interpolated these data to get growth factors for projection from 2002 to 

2009, 2012, and 2018 for those SCCs that are population based. Rhode Island provided 

state-level employment data from the Department of Labor and Training by 3-digit NAICS 

codes for 2002 and 2012. We used these data to calculate the growth factor from 2002 to 

2012 and interpolated these data to derive growth factors for 2009 and 2018. We matched 

these industry NAICS groupings to SCC codes in order to create SCC specific growth

factors for area sources. Rhode Island agreed on the use of the AEO2005 forecasts for 

projecting emissions from area source fuel combustion.

3.2.3.12 Vermont

Vermont agreed to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the enhancement of using the 

DOE’s 2005 Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion sources.

3.3 AREA SOURCE CONTROL FACTORS

We developed control factors to estimate emission reductions that will result from on-thebooks regulations that will result in post-2002 emission reductions and proposed 

regulations or actions that will result in post-2002 reductions. Control factors were 

developed for the following national or regional control measures:

• OTC VOC Model Rules

• Federal On-board Vapor Recovery 

• New Jersey Post-2002 Area Source Controls

• Residential Woodstove NSPS
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-7

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

3.3.1 OTC 2001 VOC Model Rules

Most of the MANE-VU States have adopted (or will soon adopt) the Ozone Transport 

Commission (OTC) model rules for five area source VOC categories: consumer products, 

architectural and industrial maintenance (AIM) coatings, portable fuel containers, mobile 

equipment repair and refinishing (MERR), and solvent cleaning. Information on the 

percent reduction anticipated by each model rule was obtained from Table II-6 of Control 

Measure Development Support Analysis of Ozone Transport Commission Model Rules

(E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., March 31, 2001). This set of model rules will be referred 

to as the “OTC 2001 model rules” in this document. Information as to whether a particular 

state has adopted (or will soon adopt) a particular measure was obtained form the Status 

Report on OTC States’ Efforts to Promulgate Regulations Based on OTC Model Rules (As 

of June 1, 2005, as posted on the OTC web site). For all categories, except portable fuel 

containers (see discussion below), we assumed that the rules would be fully implemented 

by all states by 2009

For consumer products, the 2001 OTC model rule was estimated to provide a 14.2 percent 

VOC emissions reductions from the Federal Part 59 rule. Most, but not all, states in the 

OTR have adopted the OTC 2001 model rule for consumer products. For this inventory, it 

was assumed that all OTC states would adopt the 2001 OTC model rule prior to 2009. 

Thus, the 14.2 percent control factor was applied uniformly to all states in the 2009, 2012, 

and 2018 projection inventories.

. Some states had already adopted some the OTC 2001 Model Rules 

in 2002 or already had similar rules in place in 2002. The 2002 emission inventory for 

those states already reflected the emission reductions expected from the OTC 2001 Model 

Rule level of control. For those states and categories, no incremental reductions were 

applied for to the future year projections, as indicated Table 3-1. 

For AIM coatings, the 2001 OTC model rule was estimated to provide a 31 percent VOC 

emissions reduction from the Federal Part 59 rule. Most, but not all, states in the OTR 

have adopted the OTC 2001 model rule for AIM coatings. For this inventory, it was 

assumed that all OTC states would adopt the 2001 OTC model rule prior to 2009. Thus, 

this control factor was applied uniformly to all states, with one exception. Maine adopted 

the OTC model rule with an alternative VOC content limit for varnishes and interior wood 

clear and semitransparent wood stains. As a result, Maine estimated that reductions from 

AIM coatings should be modeled using a 29.5 percent control factor instead of the 31 

percent estimated for the OTC 2001 model rule. 

For portable fuel containers, the 2001 OTC model rule was estimated to provide a 75 

percent reduction in VOC emissions at the end of an assumed 10-year phase-in period as 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-8

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 3-1 Adoption Matrix for 2001 OTC Model Rules

State Consumer 

Products

AIM 

Coatings

Portable Fuel 

Containers

Mobile 

Equipment 

Repair and 

Refinishing

Solvent 

Cleaning

CT Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

DE Yes Yes Yes Yes No

DC Yes Yes Yes Yes No

ME Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

MD Yes Yes Yes No No

MA Yes Yes Yes No * (7%)

NH Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

NJ Yes Yes Yes Yes ** (17%)

NY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

PA Yes Yes Yes No No

RI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

VT Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Yes – apply incremental reductions in future years

No – OTC Model Rule reductions already accounted for in 2002 inventory; no incremental reductions 

applied to future years.

* MA is amending its existing Solvent/Degreasing rule and anticipates a 7% reduction from 2002 levels. 

** NJ amended its existing Solvent/Degreasing rule and anticipates a 17% reduction from 2002 levels

older non-compliant containers are replaced with new compliant containers. The rule 

penetration (RP) depends on the assumed PFC estimated useful life and how quickly old 

non-compliant containers are replaced with new compliant containers. For the 2001 OTC 

model rule, the turnover from old to new containers is expected to be 10 percent per year. 

The MANEVU states have adopted the OTC 2001 model rule at different times, so the rule 

penetration will vary by State depending upon when the rule became effective in a given 

state. For example, compliant containers were required in Pennsylvania beginning on 

January 1, 2003. By the 2009 ozone season, there will be a 6.5 year turnover period for 

compliant PFCs in Pennsylvania. By contrast, compliant containers in New Jersey were 

not required until January 1, 2005. Thus, by the 2009 ozone season, there will be a 4.5 

year turnover period for compliant PFCs. Table 3.2 shows the effective date for compliant 

containers by state, along with the rule penetration factors and overall control efficiency. 

There are different rule penetration factors for the three inventory years because of the 

increased penetration of compliant containers into the marketplace. By 2018, 100 percent 

compliance is assumed. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-9

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 3-2 Rule Penetration and Control Efficiency Values for

2001 OTC Model Rule for PFCs 

Rule

Compliance

Date

States with this

Compliance

Date

Control

Efficiency

(%)

Rule

Penetration

(%)

Overall Control

Efficiency

(%)

Control Factor for 2009 Inventory

2003 MD, NY, PA 75 65 48.8

2004 CT, DE, DC, ME 75 55 41.3

2005 NJ 75 45 33.8

2006 NH 75 35 26.3

2007* MA, RI, VT 75 25 18.8

Control Factor for 2012 Inventory

2003 MD, NY, PA 75 95 71.3

2004 CT, DE, DC, ME 75 85 63.8

2005 NJ 75 75 56.3

2006 NH 75 65 48.8

2007* MA, RI, VT 75 55 41.3

Control Factor for 2018 Inventory

2003 MD, NY, PA 75 100 75.0

2004 CT, DE, DC, ME 75 100 75.0

2005 NJ 75 100 75.0

2006 NH 75 100 75.0

2007* MA, RI, VT 75 100 75.0

* The 2001 OTC model rule is not yet effective. It was assumed to become effective January 1, 2007 for 

the MANEVU modeling inventory. Massachusetts’ rule actually will not become effective until 2009 and is 

based only on the OTC 2006 model rule; Massachusetts will not adopt the OTC 2001 model rule.

The emission reductions from the 2001 OTC PFC model rule were calculated only for the 

emissions accounted for in the area source inventory. Additional benefits (not estimated 

for this report) would be expected from equipment refueling vapor displacement and 

spillage that is accounted for in the nonroad inventory.

For mobile equipment repair and refinishing, the 2001 OTC model rule was estimated to 

provide a 38 percent VOC emissions reductions from the Federal Part 59 rule (35% for 

paint application and 3% for cleaning operations). Most, but not all, states in the OTR 

have adopted the OTC 2001 model rule for MERR or already had similar rules in effect in 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-10

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

2002. For this inventory, it was assumed that all OTC states would adopt the 2001 OTC 

model rule prior to 2009 or have similar rules in effect. For those states (MD, MA, PA) 

that had similar rules in effect in 2002 or earlier, no incremental reductions were applied 

since it was assumed that the effects of the state rule were already accounted for in the 

2002 inventory. New Jersey indicated that a 19 percent control factor should be used for 

VOC emissions from MERR in New Jersey. For all other states, the OTC 2001 Model 

Rule control factor of 38 percent was applied.

For solvent cleaning, the 2001 OTC model rule was estimated to provide a 66 percent 

VOC emissions reductions. Most, but not all, states in the OTR have adopted the OTC 

2001 model rule for solvent cleaning or already had similar rules in effect in 2002. For 

this inventory, it was assumed that all OTC states would adopt the 2001 OTC model rule 

prior to 2009 or have similar rules in effect. For those states (DE, DC, MD, PA, VT) that 

had similar rules in effect in 2002 or earlier, no incremental reductions were applied since 

it was assumed that the effects of the state rule were already accounted for in the 2002 

inventory. Massachusetts indicated that some portion of the reductions resulting from the 

OTC 2001 model rule were already accounted for in their 2002 emissions, but that the state 

anticipated an additional 7 percent reduction from anticipated amendments. New Jersey 

indicated that a 17 percent control factor should be used for VOC emissions from solvent 

cleaning in New Jersey. For all other states (CT, ME, NH, NY, RI), the OTC 2001 Model 

Rule control factor of 66 percent was applied.

Table D-1 in Appendix D shows the anticipated percent reductions by state, SCC, and year 

from implementation of the OTC 2001 VOC Model Rules. 

3.3.2 On-Board Vapor Recovery

The U.S. EPA issued regulations requiring onboard vapor recovery (ORVR) standards for 

the control of vehicle refueling emissions in 1994. ORVR works by routing refueling 

vapors to a carbon canister on the vehicle and are expected to achieve from 95-98 percent 

reduction in VOC emissions for those vehicles equipped with ORVR. ORVR is required 

to be installed on some new light-duty gasoline vehicles in 1998, and all new light-and 

medium-duty automobiles and trucks will be required to have ORVR installed by 2006.

For the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, E.H. Pechan made estimates of emission 

reductions as they grow over time due to increased rule penetration. The following 

discussion describes how the on-board vapor recovery control factors were developed 

(email from Maureen Mullen, E.H. Pechan): 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-11

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

“Onroad refueling control factors were calculated based on the percentage difference 

between the projection year (2007, 2008, 2009, 2012, and 2018) MOBILE6 refueling 

emission factors and the 2002 MOBILE6 refueling emission factors. 

MOBILE6 emission factors were calculated at January and July temperature and fuel 

conditions. July emission factors were used as the surrogate for the five-month ozone 

season (May through September) and the January emission factors were used as the 

surrogates for the remaining seven months. Temperatures modeled were the January 

and July average daily monthly maximum and minimum temperatures for each State, 

based on 30-year average temperature data, as used in EPA’s second Section 812 

Prospective analysis. Within a State, MOBILE6 input files were created for each 

unique combination of: January and July RVP, RFG, oxygenated fuel, and Stage II 

control programs. Fuel data was based on 2002 data, also as used in the Section 812 

analysis. Information on Stage II control programs and control efficiencies were 

provided by EPA, as included in the draft 2002 NEI. Using these same temperature 

inputs, fuel inputs, and Stage II control inputs (where applicable), Pechan calculated 

MOBILE6 emission factors for calendar years 2002, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2012, and 

2018.

The resulting MOBILE6 emission factors were first weighted according to the default 

MOBILE6 VMT mix to determine the weighted average refueling emission factor for 

all gasoline vehicle types. The resulting January and July emission factors were 

weighted together according to the number of days in the seven-month season (212 

days) and the five-month ozone season (153). After this was done for all of the 

modeled years and State or sub-State areas, the overall control efficiency for refueling, 

due to fleet turnover, was calculated based on the percentage difference between the 

2002 and corresponding projection year emission factors. These control efficiencies 

were then assigned to individual counties, based on the mapping of fuel and Stage II 

control parameters to those modeled in the MOBILE6 files.”

These projections were made on a county-by-county basis. Table D-2 shows the 

anticipated percent reductions by county, SCC, and year. 

3.3.3 Post-2002 Area Source Controls in New Jersey

New Jersey made gasoline transfer provision amendments at N.J.A.C. 7:27-16.3. The 

Stage I portion of the amendments are expected to result in emissions reductions of 23.2 

percent from the 2002 baseline. This is based on a control efficiency of 29 percent and a 

rule effectiveness of 80 percent. The State II portion of the amendments are already 

incorporated into the inventory through the MOBILE6 inputs.

New Jersey also made amendments to ICI boiler provisions at N.J.A.C. The amendments 

require any ICI boiler has a maximum gross heat input rate of at least 5 mmBTU/hour, 

whether or not it is located at a major NOx facility, to conduct annual tune-ups. In the 

support documentation for this rule amendment, New Jersey estimated that the tune-ups 

would result in a 25 percent reduction in NOx emissions.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-12

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

3.3.4 Residential Wood Combustion 

Control factors were evaluated to account for the replacement of retired woodstoves that 

emit at pre-new source performance standard (NSPS) levels. We used EPA’s latest 

methodology provided by Marc Houyoux of EPA/OAQPS. This methodology uses a 

combination growth and control factor and is based on activity not pollutant. The growth 

and control are accounted for in a single factor the SCCs split out the controlled and 

uncontrolled equipment. The control is indirectly incorporated based on which stove is 

used. The combined growth and control rates are as follows: 

• Fireplaces increase 1%/yr

• Old woodstoves (non-EPA certified) decrease 2%/yr

• New woodstoves (EPA certified) increase 2%/yr

The data to support these rates were collected as part of the woodstove change-out program 

development in OAQPS. Table D-3 shows the anticipated percent changes by SCC and 

year. 

3.4 AREA SOURCE QA/QC REVIEW

Throughout the inventory development process, quality assurance steps were performed to 

ensure that no double counting of emissions occurred, to ensure that a full and complete 

inventory was developed for MANE-VU, and to make sure that projection calculations 

were working correctly. Quality assurance was an important component to the inventory 

development process and MACTEC performed the following QA steps on the area source 

components of the 2009/2012/2018 projection inventories:

1. State agencies reviewed the draft growth and control factors in the summer of 

2005. Changes based on these comments were implemented in the files.

2. SCC level emission summaries were prepared and evaluated to ensure that 

emissions were consistent and that there were no missing sources. Tier 

comparisons (by pollutant) were developed between the revised 2002 base year 

inventory and the 2009/2012/2018 projection inventories.

3. Emission inventory files in NIF format were provided for state agency review 

and comment. Changes based on these comments were implemented.

4. All final files were run through EPA’s Format and Content checking software.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-13

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

3.5 AREA SOURCE NIF, SMOKE AND SUMMARY FILES

The Version 3 file names and descriptions delivered to MARAMA are shown in Table 3-3.

3.6 AREA SOURCE EMISSION SUMMARIES

Emission summaries by state, year, and pollutant are presented in Tables 3-4 through 3-10

for CO, NH3, NOx, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, SO2, and VOC, respectively. 

Table 3-3 Area Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

File Name Date Description

MANEVU_OTB2009_Area_NIFV3_2.mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2009 OTB area

source NIF inventory

MANEVU_OTB2012_Area_NIFV3_2.mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2012 OTB area

source NIF inventory

MANEVU_OTB2018_Area_NIFV3_2.mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2018 OTB area

source NIF inventory

MANEVU_OTB2009_Area_IDAV3_2.txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2009 OTB area

source inventory in SMOKE 

IDA format

MANEVU_OTB2012_Area_IDAV3_2.txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2012 OTB area

source inventory in SMOKE 

IDA format

MANEVU_OTB2018_Area_IDA3V_2.txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2018 OTB area

source inventory in SMOKE 

IDA format

MANEVU OTB BOTW Area V3_2 State Summary.xls Nov. 8, 2006 Spreadsheet with state totals by 

pollutant for all area sources 

MANEVU OTB BOTW Area V3_2 State SCC 

Summary.xls

Nov. 8, 2006 Spreadsheet with SCC totals by 

state and pollutant for all area 

sources.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-14

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 3-4 Area Sources

OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 70,198 65,865 63,874 59,797

DE 14,052 15,395 15,233 14,864

DC 2,300 2,417 2,460 2,512

ME 109,223 102,743 99,877 94,181

MD 141,178 143,653 144,233 144,649

MA 137,496 132,797 130,255 125,205

NH 79,647 76,504 75,319 73,038

NJ 97,657 90,432 88,048 83,119

NY 356,254 336,576 327,118 307,659

PA 266,935 266,887 264,012 257,396

RI 8,007 8,007 8,026 8,024

VT 43,849 42,683 42,172 41,283

Total 1,326,796 1,283,959 1,260,627 1,211,727

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-15

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 3-5 Area Sources

OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 5,318 5,208 5,156 5,061

DE 13,279 13,316 13,328 13,342

DC 14 16 16 17

ME 8,747 10,453 11,116 12,312

MD 25,834 31,879 34,222 38,155

MA 18,809 19,131 19,275 19,552

NH 2,158 2,466 2,584 2,789

NJ 17,572 19,457 20,154 21,435

NY 67,422 81,626 87,116 96,078

PA 79,911 98,281 105,418 117,400

RI 883 945 972 1,025

VT 9,848 12,156 13,062 14,580

Total 249,795 294,934 312,419 341,746

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-16

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 3-6 Area Sources

OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 12,689 13,173 13,342 13,388

DE 2,608 2,821 2,913 3,014

DC 1,644 1,961 2,081 2,259

ME 7,360 7,477 7,486 7,424

MD 15,678 16,858 17,315 18,073

MA 34,281 35,732 36,331 37,187

NH 10,960 11,879 12,055 12,430

NJ 26,692 24,032 23,981 23,660

NY 98,803 106,375 107,673 108,444

PA 47,591 50,162 50,793 50,829

RI 3,886 4,149 4,260 4,397

VT 3,208 3,419 3,429 3,430

Total 265,400 278,038 281,659 284,535

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-17

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 3-7 Area Sources

OTB/OTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 48,281 48,970 49,004 49,479

DE 13,039 13,928 14,236 14,844

DC 3,269 3,511 3,605 3,825

ME 168,953 175,979 179,689 189,619

MD 95,060 105,944 110,141 117,396

MA 192,860 198,668 200,692 204,922

NH 43,328 46,060 47,187 49,801

NJ 61,601 61,684 61,284 60,880

NY 369,595 382,124 385,925 392,027

PA 391,897 421,235 432,844 454,970

RI 8,295 8,962 9,244 9,797

VT 56,131 60,521 62,465 66,916

Total 1,452,309 1,527,586 1,556,316 1,614,476

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-18

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 3-8 Area Sources

OTB/OTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 14,247 13,766 13,517 13,033

DE 3,204 3,387 3,403 3,426

DC 805 860 879 917

ME 32,774 33,026 33,189 33,820

MD 27,318 28,923 29,508 30,449

MA 42,083 43,121 43,186 43,438

NH 17,532 17,965 18,050 18,316

NJ 19,350 18,590 18,271 17,653

NY 87,154 87,576 87,260 86,422

PA 74,925 79,169 80,728 83,570

RI 2,064 2,184 2,232 2,316

VT 11,065 11,482 11,652 12,059

Total 332,521 340,049 341,875 345,419

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-19

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 3-9 Area Sources

OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 12,418 12,581 12,604 12,184

DE 1,588 1,599 1,602 1,545

DC 1,337 1,487 1,541 1,632

ME 13,149 13,776 13,846 13,901

MD 12,393 13,685 14,074 14,741

MA 25,488 25,961 26,029 25,570

NH 7,072 7,463 7,470 7,421

NJ 10,744 10,672 10,697 10,510

NY 130,409 139,589 140,154 141,408

PA 63,679 67,535 67,446 66,363

RI 4,557 5,024 5,189 5,398

VT 4,087 4,646 4,687 4,764

Total 286,921 304,018 305,339 305,437

0

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

125,000

150,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 3 – Area Sources Page 3-20

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 3-10 Area Sources

OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 87,302 75,693 73,560 71,274

DE 15,519 14,245 13,943 13,744

DC 6,432 5,420 5,352 5,255

ME 100,621 91,910 91,667 92,410

MD 120,254 110,385 108,067 110,046

MA 162,145 148,625 145,674 140,558

NH 65,370 63,069 63,356 64,368

NJ 167,882 147,617 143,752 139,626

NY 507,292 462,811 456,856 457,421

PA 240,785 228,444 230,393 243,421

RI 31,402 26,695 25,548 23,561

VT 23,265 24,068 24,635 26,198

Total 1,528,269 1,398,982 1,382,803 1,387,882

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

550,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/W
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-1

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

4.0 NONROAD SOURCES

The nonroad source sector is comprised of nonroad engines included in EPA’s 

NONROAD model, as well as other nonroad engines not accounted for in the NONROAD

model, including aircraft, commercial marine vessels, and locomotive engines. The 

sections that follow describe the projection process used to develop 2009/2012/2018 

nonroad projection estimates for sources found in the NONROAD model and those 

sources estimated outside of the model (locomotives, airplanes and commercial marine 

vessels).

4.1 NONROAD MODEL SOURCES

NONROAD model source categories include equipment such as recreational boats and 

watercraft; recreational vehicles; farm, industrial, mining, and construction machinery; and 

lawn and garden equipment. Also included are aircraft ground support equipment and rail 

maintenance equipment. These equipment types are powered by engines using diesel, 

gasoline, compressed natural gas (CNG), and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). 

EPA released a revised version of NONROAD during December 2005 called NONROAD 

2005. EPA’s National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) is a consolidated modeling 

system that incorporates the NONROAD and MOBILE models, along with a county 

database of inputs. EPA also released an updated version of NMIM called NMIM2005, 

which incorporates the NONROAD2005 model. 

MACTEC utilized the NMIM2005 model to develop projections for nonroad engines 

included in the NONROAD2005 model. Projected emission estimates were calculated 

using NMIM default data. Prior to starting the NMIM2005 runs, MACTEC confirmed 

with U.S. EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) that the database used 

for fuel sulfur content, gas Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) values and reformulated fuel 

programs was current and up to date for the MANE-VU region. The information received 

from OTAQ indicated that these values were the most current.

NMIM2005 runs were then developed for each projection year. These included 2009, 

2012 and 2018. Emission calculations were made at the monthly level and consolidated to 

provide annual values. This enabled monthly temperatures and changes in reformulated 

gas to be captured by the program. 

The NMIM/NONROAD2005 results in NIF 3.0, and ran EPA’s QA checker program to 

verify that the NIF 3.0 files were properly constructed.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-2

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

4.2 AIRCRAFT, COMMERCIAL MARINE, AND LOCOMOTIVES

Since aircraft, commercial marine vessels, and locomotives are not included in the 

NONROAD model, emission projections for these sources were developed separately. 

The starting point for the emission projections was Version 3 of the MANE-VU 2002 

Nonroad emission inventory (Documentation of the MANE-VU 2002 Nonroad Sector 

Emission Inventory, Version 3, Draft Technical Memorandum, March 2006). 

MACTEC’s approach to developing emission projections for these sources was to use 

combined growth and control factors developed from emission projections for U.S. EPA’s 

Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) development effort. MACTEC obtained emission 

projections developed for the CAIR rule. We then calculated the combined growth and 

control factors by determining the ratio of emissions between 2002 and each of the 

MANE-VU projection years (2009, 2012, and 2018). The CAIR emissions were available 

for 2001, 2010, 2015 and 2020. Thus, we developed intermediate year estimates using 

linear interpolation between the actual CAIR years and the MANE-VU years. 

Using this approach we developed State/county/SCC/pollutant growth/control factors for 

use in projecting the MANE-VU base year data to the year of interest. These values were 

then used to multiply times the base year value to obtain the projected values. Since the 

development of the CAIR factors included both growth and controls, no separate control 

factors were developed for these sources except where exceptions to this method were used 

for States that requested alternative growth/control methods (see below).

Once the CAIR factors were developed, MACTEC compared the SCCs contained in the 

CAIR inventory with those used in MANE-VU. In some cases there were differences. In 

cases where a similar SCC in the CAIR inventory could be assigned to the SCC in the 

MANE-VU inventory the State/County/SCC/pollutant growth and control factor for the 

substitute was assigned to the MANE-VU SCC. If no corresponding county SCC 

substitution could be found, a State or MANE-VU regional average value for the substitute 

SCC was developed and assigned for use in projecting emissions. The substitution scheme 

was to use State values first, then MANE-VU regional values if the State value couldn’t be 

used.

This projection method was used with three exceptions. These exceptions were: 1) 

Maryland sources, 2) DC locomotive growth and controls and 3) Logan (Boston) airport. 

Each of these sources used alternative growth and/or controls provided by the States or 

developed from current Federal rules for these sources (applies to controls only). Each of 

these is discussed below.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-3

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

4.2.1 Maryland Non-NONROAD Source Emissions

Maryland indicated that they would prefer to use EGAS growth factors coupled with 

Federal controls to determine projected emissions for these source categories. Maryland 

provided EGAS growth factors for use with these categories. Control values were 

developed based on Federal rules that were on the books.

For CMV, controls were developed based on data contained in Table 1.1-2 of the 

document “Final Regulatory Support Document: Control of Emissions from New Marine 

Compression-Ignition Engines at or Above 30 Liters per Cylinder,” EPA420-R-03-004, 

January 2003. Values in that table were interpolated to develop emission estimates with 

and without controls for the MANE-VU years (and base year) and then control factors 

were calculated for those values. Only Category 3 marine engines were identified in the 

Maryland inventory and thus only NOx controls for those engines were developed. 

For locomotives, control factors for different types of locomotives were developed using 

Tables 6-2 through 6-5 of the document “Locomotive Emission Standards: Regulatory 

Support Document,” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile 

Sources, April 1998. Since these tables only showed PM controls, we assumed the same 

level of control for both PM-10 and PM-2.5. Controls for VOC, NOx and PM were 

developed using these tables.

In addition to engine specification controls for both CMV and locomotives, we also 

developed control factors resulting from changes to diesel fuel sulfur contents. The diesel 

fuel sulfur regulations were utilized to develop controls for SO2 and PM due solely to 

changing fuel sulfur requirements. Data from Tables 3.1-6a and 3.4-8a of the document

“Final Regulatory Analysis: Control of Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Engines,”

EPA420-R-04-007, May 2004 were used to develop control levels created due to changes 

in fuel sulfur content. In cases where there were controls due to both engine technology 

and fuel sulfur reduction, we added the control efficiencies together to create a combined 

control efficiency. All control values are considered to be “additive”. In other words, the 

controls applied are above those found in the base year. Thus the controls were used on 

the base year emission values without back-calculation to determine uncontrolled levels 

since the controls are in addition to those controls.

The control values were then applied along with the growth factors to the base year 

emissions for Maryland to produce the required emission projections.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-4

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

4.2.2 DC Locomotive Emissions

The District of Columbia emission contact provided MACTEC with alternative growth 

factors for locomotive emissions. The growth factors provided were:

2002-2009 6.9%

2002-2012 9.9%

2002-2018 13.7%

Since the CAIR factors were combined growth and controls, the control factors developed 

for locomotives for Maryland (based on Federal control programs) were used to apply 

controls to the DC locomotive emissions. As was the case for Maryland, the control 

factors were “additive” and were used on the base year emission without back-calculating

uncontrolled emissions since the control levels were relative to controls in place for 2002.

4.2.3 Logan (Boston) Airport Emissions

Massachusetts supplied historic and future year projections of operations at Logan Airport. 

The data covered the period 2000-2010. Since only one year of the period required for 

MANE-VU projections was included in that interval (2009), MACTEC developed 

estimates for 2012 and 2018 from those data by linear interpolation. Two linear 

interpolations were developed. The first used the entire data set (2000-2010) to develop a 

linear projection for 2012 and 2018 and a second using just the 2002-2010 data. For the 

final growth factors, MACTEC used the average of the two. These growth factors were 

then applied to commercial aircraft operations for Suffolk County (FIPS = 25025). The 

growth factors developed were:

2002-2009 1.184

2002-2012 1.22

2002-2018 1.33

No controls that would come on board for aircraft for the projection years were identified 

from a review of Federal programs.

4.3 NONROAD QA/QC REVIEW

Throughout the inventory development process, quality assurance steps were performed to 

ensure that no double counting of emissions occurred, to ensure that a full and complete 

inventory was developed for MANE-VU, and to make sure that projection calculations 

were working correctly. MACTEC performed the following QA steps on nonroad source 

projection inventories: (1) All final files (NONROAD only) were run through EPA’s 

Format and Content checking software; SCC level emission summaries were prepared and 

evaluated to ensure that emissions were consistent with the 2002 projections and that there 

were no missing source categories or geographical areas.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-5

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

4.4 NONROAD NIF, SMOKE, AND SUMMARY FILES

The Version 3.1 files delivered to MARAMA are shown in Table 4-1.

4.5 NONROAD EMISSION SUMMARIES

Table 4-2a shows the CO emissions by state and year for the entire nonroad sector. Table 

4-2b presents the CO emission results for NONROAD model equipment only. Table 4-2c 

presents the CO emission results for only the aircraft, commercial marine vessel, and 

locomotive categories. Tables 4-3 to 4-8 present the emission results for the other criteria 

pollutants of interest.

Table 4-1 Nonroad Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

File Name Date Description

MANEVU_OTB2009_NR_NIFV3_1.mdb Oct. 23, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2009 nonroad 

source NIF inventory

MANEVU_OTB2012_NR_NIFV3_1.mdb Oct. 23, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2012 nonroad 

source NIF inventory

MANEVU_OTB2018_NR_NIFV3_1.mdb Oct. 23, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2018 nonroad 

source NIF inventory

MANEVU_OTB2009_NR_IDAV3_1.txt Oct. 26, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2009 nonroad 

source inventory in SMOKE 

IDA format

MANEVU_OTB2012_NR_IDAV3_1.txt Oct. 26, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2012 nonroad 

source inventory in SMOKE 

IDA format

MANEVU_OTB2018_NR_IDA3V_1.txt Oct. 26, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2018 nonroad 

source inventory in SMOKE 

IDA format

MANEVU OTB Nonroad V3_1 State Summary.xls Oct. 23, 2006 Spreadsheet with state totals by 

pollutant for all nonroad 

sources, NONROAD model 

sources, and aircraft, 

locomotives, and commercial 

marine vessels

MANEVU OTB Nonroad V3_1 State SCC Summary.xls Oct. 23, 2006 Spreadsheet with SCC totals by 

state and pollutant for all 

nonroad sources, NONROAD 

model sources
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-6

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-2a All Nonroad Sources

OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 276,773 282,788 288,061 303,764

DE 68,782 74,856 76,491 80,646

DC 18,845 20,746 21,306 22,429

ME 153,424 163,782 165,273 166,679

MD 437,400 497,276 513,737 550,795

MA 461,514 504,400 516,019 546,373

NH 130,782 142,318 143,804 147,544

NJ 704,396 753,916 777,069 831,880

NY 1,233,968 1,349,439 1,388,406 1,474,727

PA 931,978 1,031,816 1,058,256 1,119,247

RI 73,013 80,228 82,113 87,195

VT 62,248 68,360 69,003 70,074

Total 4,553,124 4,969,925 5,099,538 5,401,353

0

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000

1,250,000

1,500,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-7

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-2b NONROAD Model Sources

OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 274,388 280,253 285,415 300,931

DE 65,954 71,877 73,397 77,356

DC 18,775 20,671 21,229 22,350

ME 148,555 158,715 160,043 161,215

MD 424,777 482,312 497,806 532,970

MA 448,399 490,895 501,684 530,686

NH 128,572 139,288 140,655 144,191

NJ 692,548 741,792 764,424 818,519

NY 1,219,309 1,333,923 1,372,164 1,457,277

PA 903,168 1,003,480 1,029,045 1,088,614

RI 71,573 78,764 80,607 85,618

VT 61,732 67,802 68,421 69,456

Total 4,457,748 4,869,771 4,994,890 5,289,186

0

250,000

500,000

750,000

1,000,000

1,250,000

1,500,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-8

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-2c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources

OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 2,385 2,535 2,646 2,833

DE 2,828 2,979 3,094 3,290

DC 70 75 77 79

ME 4,868 5,067 5,230 5,464

MD 12,624 14,964 15,931 17,825

MA 13,116 13,505 14,335 15,687

NH 2,211 3,030 3,149 3,353

NJ 11,849 12,124 12,645 13,361

NY 14,660 15,516 16,242 17,450

PA 28,810 28,336 29,211 30,633

RI 1,440 1,464 1,506 1,577

VT 516 558 582 618

Total 95,375 100,154 104,648 112,167

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-9

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-3a All Nonroad Sources

OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 17 18 19 21

DE 5 6 6 7

DC 2 3 3 3

ME 11 13 14 15

MD 28 31 33 36

MA 28 31 33 36

NH 9 10 11 12

NJ 43 45 47 52

NY 79 89 94 103

PA 55 62 66 73

RI 4 4 5 5

VT 5 5 6 6

Total 287 317 337 369

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-10

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-3b NONROAD Model Sources

OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 17 18 19 21

DE 5 6 6 6

DC 2 3 3 3

ME 11 13 14 15

MD 28 31 33 36

MA 28 31 33 36

NH 9 10 11 12

NJ 43 45 47 52

NY 79 89 94 103

PA 55 62 66 73

RI 4 4 5 5

VT 5 5 6 6

Total 287 318 335 369

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-11

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-3c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources

OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 0 0 0 0

DE 0 0 0 0

DC 0 0 0 0

ME 0 0 0 0

MD 0 0 0 0

MA 0 0 0 0

NH 0 0 0 0

NJ 0 0 0 0

NY 0 0 0 0

PA 0 0 0 0

RI 0 0 0 0

VT 0 0 0 0

Total <1 <1 <1 <1

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-12

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-4a All Nonroad Sources

OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 25,460 21,512 19,316 16,233

DE 16,227 15,439 15,081 14,631

DC 3,571 2,981 2,620 1,815

ME 9,820 8,500 7,752 6,543

MD 37,472 31,762 29,058 24,257

MA 42,769 35,703 32,118 27,040

NH 9,912 8,485 7,624 6,344

NJ 63,479 52,703 48,234 41,166

NY 109,878 94,186 85,852 72,400

PA 103,824 76,105 67,818 55,771

RI 5,002 4,022 3,470 2,723

VT 4,217 3,452 2,992 2,262

Total 431,631 354,850 321,935 271,185

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-13

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-4b NONROAD Model Sources

OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 17,897 14,849 12,811 9,784

DE 5,798 4,755 4,108 2,966

DC 3,066 2,561 2,221 1,444

ME 8,229 6,957 6,211 4,970

MD 27,789 23,431 20,839 15,745

MA 30,047 24,606 21,274 16,096

NH 8,150 6,749 5,893 4,583

NJ 43,515 34,447 30,416 23,594

NY 78,648 66,645 58,900 45,400

PA 62,265 49,982 42,571 30,797

RI 4,564 3,624 3,066 2,294

VT 4,170 3,403 2,941 2,205

Total 294,138 242,009 211,252 159,877

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-14

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-4c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources

OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 7,563 6,663 6,505 6,449

DE 10,428 10,684 10,973 11,665

DC 505 420 399 371

ME 1,592 1,543 1,541 1,573

MD 9,683 8,331 8,219 8,512

MA 12,722 11,097 10,844 10,944

NH 1,763 1,736 1,731 1,761

NJ 19,964 18,256 17,818 17,572

NY 31,230 27,541 26,952 27,000

PA 41,559 26,123 25,247 24,974

RI 438 398 404 429

VT 47 49 51 57

Total 137,493 112,841 110,683 111,308

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-15

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-5a All Nonroad Sources

OTB/OTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 1,952 1,642 1,532 1,236

DE 1,021 947 940 897

DC 310 235 209 135

ME 1,437 1,367 1,301 1,086

MD 4,936 4,353 4,191 3,814

MA 3,531 2,964 2,768 2,246

NH 1,058 944 881 698

NJ 5,495 4,539 4,233 3,489

NY 9,605 8,050 7,425 5,830

PA 9,738 8,501 8,112 6,949

RI 500 435 414 348

VT 530 476 439 331

Total 40,114 34,453 32,445 27,059

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-16

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-5b NONROAD Model Sources

OTB/OTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 1,713 1,407 1,295 987

DE 570 456 414 301

DC 298 226 200 127

ME 1,204 1,119 1,039 797

MD 3,119 2,534 2,321 1,782

MA 2,887 2,370 2,176 1,640

NH 947 834 769 581

NJ 4,285 3,424 3,143 2,411

NY 8,339 6,871 6,248 4,624

PA 6,282 5,282 4,839 3,574

RI 403 337 314 244

VT 518 462 425 316

Total 30,565 25,321 23,182 17,385

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-17

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-5c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources

OTB/OTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 239 235 237 249

DE 451 491 526 596

DC 12 9 9 8

ME 233 248 262 289

MD 1,817 1,819 1,870 2,032

MA 644 594 592 606

NH 111 110 112 117

NJ 1,210 1,115 1,090 1,078

NY 1,266 1,179 1,177 1,206

PA 3,456 3,219 3,273 3,375

RI 97 98 100 104

VT 12 14 14 15

Total 9,549 9,132 9,263 9,674

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-18

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-6a All Nonroad Sources

OTB/OTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 1,794 1,508 1,408 1,135

DE 926 856 849 808

DC 299 216 192 124

ME 1,329 1,238 1,177 978

MD 4,357 3,806 3,653 3,301

MA 3,226 2,710 2,531 2,052

NH 965 861 802 634

NJ 4,997 4,113 3,829 3,143

NY 8,821 7,390 6,815 5,349

PA 8,440 7,274 6,900 5,808

RI 443 383 364 303

VT 486 436 402 303

Total 36,084 30,791 28,922 23,938

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-19

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-6b NONROAD Model Sources

OTB/OTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 1,578 1,296 1,193 911

DE 525 420 381 277

DC 288 208 184 117

ME 1,135 1,030 956 734

MD 2,870 2,333 2,137 1,641

MA 2,659 2,184 2,005 1,512

NH 872 768 708 536

NJ 3,951 3,154 2,896 2,223

NY 7,677 6,327 5,755 4,262

PA 5,784 4,866 4,459 3,296

RI 371 311 290 226

VT 477 426 391 292

Total 28,186 23,321 21,356 16,027

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-20

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-6c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources

OTB/OTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 216 212 215 224

DE 401 436 468 531

DC 11 8 8 7

ME 194 208 221 244

MD 1,487 1,473 1,516 1,660

MA 568 526 526 540

NH 94 93 94 98

NJ 1,047 959 933 920

NY 1,144 1,063 1,060 1,087

PA 2,656 2,408 2,441 2,512

RI 72 72 74 77

VT 9 10 11 11

Total 7,898 7,470 7,566 7,911

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-21

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-7a All Nonroad Sources

OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 2,087 887 711 815

DE 3,983 2,851 2,834 3,296

DC 375 66 9 5

ME 917 201 82 82

MD 7,942 1,638 706 577

MA 3,791 983 470 442

NH 891 310 218 246

NJ 15,686 3,508 1,253 832

NY 12,920 3,387 1,724 1,686

PA 7,915 1,659 667 607

RI 377 93 42 42

VT 372 68 15 13

Total 57,257 15,651 8,731 8,643

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-22

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-7b NONROAD Model Sources

OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 1,377 249 39 28

DE 513 90 12 8

DC 341 59 6 3

ME 772 132 24 19

MD 2,569 452 63 42

MA 2,428 429 66 47

NH 673 119 20 16

NJ 3,525 607 93 67

NY 6,966 1,208 182 130

PA 5,292 917 135 92

RI 336 60 10 7

VT 368 64 10 8

Total 25,159 4,387 661 467

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-23

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-7c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources

OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 711 638 672 787

DE 3,470 2,761 2,822 3,288

DC 34 7 3 2

ME 145 69 58 63

MD 5,372 1,186 643 535

MA 1,363 554 404 395

NH 218 191 198 230

NJ 12,161 2,901 1,160 765

NY 5,953 2,179 1,542 1,556

PA 2,623 742 532 515

RI 42 33 32 35

VT 5 4 5 5

Total 32,097 11,264 8,070 8,176

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-24

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-8a All Nonroad Sources

OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 33,880 24,910 22,657 20,694

DE 8,010 6,440 6,044 5,653

DC 2,073 1,559 1,438 1,369

ME 31,144 29,445 27,093 21,988

MD 56,330 43,260 40,266 37,969

MA 56,749 43,429 39,713 36,306

NH 22,377 19,651 17,933 15,003

NJ 83,919 62,920 57,769 53,625

NY 157,612 128,421 117,770 104,562

PA 102,331 84,744 78,630 69,956

RI 7,780 6,038 5,640 5,389

VT 10,548 10,105 9,304 7,566

Total 572,751 460,922 424,257 380,080

0

30,000

60,000

90,000

120,000

150,000

180,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-25

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-8b NONROAD Model Sources

OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 33,519 24,546 22,286 20,308

DE 7,531 5,943 5,533 5,115

DC 2,053 1,540 1,419 1,351

ME 30,741 29,030 26,669 21,547

MD 53,035 39,731 36,638 34,106

MA 54,836 41,473 37,706 34,185

NH 22,238 19,476 17,752 14,810

NJ 81,900 60,878 55,682 51,451

NY 155,475 126,265 115,553 102,224

PA 99,241 82,094 75,941 67,186

RI 7,699 5,956 5,556 5,302

VT 10,520 10,076 9,273 7,533

Total 558,788 447,006 410,009 365,117

0

30,000

60,000

90,000

120,000

150,000

180,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section4 – Nonroad Sources Page 4-26

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 4-8c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources

OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 361 364 371 386

DE 480 497 511 538

DC 20 19 19 18

ME 403 415 424 441

MD 3,295 3,529 3,628 3,863

MA 1,913 1,956 2,007 2,121

NH 139 175 181 193

NJ 2,019 2,042 2,087 2,174

NY 2,137 2,156 2,217 2,338

PA 3,090 2,650 2,689 2,770

RI 81 82 84 87

VT 27 29 31 33

Total 13,964 13,916 14,248 14,963

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009

2012

2018
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-1

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

5.0 BEYOND-ON-THE-WAY EMISSION INVENTORY

The States are considering additional control measures as part of their planning to achieve 

regional haze goals and to attain the ozone and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS). To accomplish this, many of the states will need to implement 

additional measures to reduce emissions. As such, the Ozone Transport Commission 

(OTC) undertook an exercise to identify a suite of additional control measures that could 

be used by the states in the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) in attaining their air quality 

goals. 

Based on the analyses conducted by various OTC Workgroups, the OTC Commissioners 

made several recommendations at the Commissioner’s meeting in Boston on June 7, 2006: 

• Memorandum of Understanding Among the States of the Ozone Transport 

Commission on a Regional Strategy Concerning the Integrated Control of Ozone 

Precursors from Various Sources

• Resolution 06-02 of the Ozone Transport Commission Concerning Coordination 

and Implementation of Regional Ozone Control Strategies for Certain Source 

Categories

• Statement of the Ozone Transport Commission Concerning Multi-Pollutant 

Emission Control of Electric Generating Units

• Resolution 06-03 of the Ozone Transport Commission Concerning Federal 

Guidance and Rulemaking for Nationally-Relevant Ozone Control Measures

The Commissioners recommended that States consider emission reductions from the 

following source categories: 

• Consumer Products

• Portable Fuel Containers

• Adhesives and Sealants Application 

• Diesel Engine Chip Reflash

• Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt Paving

• Asphalt Production Plants

• Cement Kilns

• Glass Furnaces

• Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional (ICI) Boilers

• Regional Fuels

• Electric Generating Units (EGUs)

This suite of controls for the above source categories constitutes a “beyond-on-the-way” 

(BOTW) scenario to be used in modeling ozone, fine particles, and regional haze in the 

OTR and MANE-VU regions. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-2

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

For the MANE-VU modeling inventory, each state was asked to complete a matrix to 

identify which of the above source category control measures to include and in which years 

the control measure should be applied. This section documents the emission reductions 

anticipated to result from the implementation of the above control measures based on the 

state recommendations for measures to include for each state, source category, and 

projection year. There are five subsections discussing the control measure and emission 

reductions for the five source category sectors: nonEGU point sources, area sources, 

EGUs, onroad mobile sources, and nonroad mobile sources. 

5.1 NONEGU POINT SOURCES

This Section describes the analysis of the control measures to reduce emissions from nonEGU point sources. The control measures included in this analysis reduce emissions for 

the following pollutants and nonEGU point source categories: 

• NOx measures: asphalt production plants; cement kilns; glass and fiberglass 

furnaces; low sulfur heating oil for commercial and institutional units; and ICI

boilers (natural gas, #2 fuel oil, #4/#6 fuel oil, and coal); 

• Primary PM10 and PM2.5 measure: commercial heating oil;

• SO2 measures: commercial heating oil and ICI boilers (#2 fuel oil, #4/#6 fuel oil, 

and coal); and 

• VOC measure: adhesives and sealants application; 

For the MANE-VU modeling inventory, each state was asked to complete a matrix to 

identify which nonEGU control measures to include and in which years the control 

measure should be applied. Table 5.1 summarizes the staff recommendations for NOx 

control measures to include in the BOTW regional modeling inventory for non-EGU 

source categories (except ICI boilers). Table 5.2 summarizes the staff recommendations 

for NOx emission reductions for ICI boilers. Tables 5.3 and 5.4 summarize the staff 

recommendations for control measures to include in the BOTW regional modeling 

inventory for SO2 and VOC emissions, respectively. The following subsections describe 

the emission reductions anticipated for each of the control measures.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-3

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5.1 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – NOx Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Asphalt 

Production Plants Cement Kilns

Glass and 

Fiberglass 

Furnaces

Commercial & 

Institutional

Heating Oil

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No Yes

DE No No No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No No

DC Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Yes Yes

ME No No No Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A No Yes Yes

MD No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

MA No No No N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

NH No No No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No Yes

NJ No Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A No Yes Yes 2 No 2 Yes Yes

NY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 2 Yes 3 No 3 Yes Yes

PA No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

RI No No No N/A N/A N/A No No No No Yes Yes

VT No No No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No No

Yes - Include emission reductions from control measure in modeling inventory

No - Do not include emission reduction from control measure in modeling inventory

N/A – No facilities of this type located in the state

1) New York specified that a 40 percent NOx reduction from cement kilns should be used.

2) New Jersey specified a 20 percent NOx reduction from glass furnaces in 2012 and a 35 percent 

reduction in 2018. 

3) New York specified a 70 percent NOx reduction from glass furnaces beginning in 2009.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-4

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5.2 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – NOx Emissions from ICI Boilers

ICI Boilers

< 25 mmBTU/hour

ICI Boilers

25-50 mmBtu/hour

ICI Boilers

50-100 

mmBtu/hour

ICI Boilers

100-250 

mmBtu/hour

ICI Boilers

>250 mmBtu/hour

(see note 7)

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT Yes Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 No 1 No No

DE No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes 4 Yes 4 No 4 No No

DC No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

ME No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

MD No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No

MA No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

NH No No No Yes Yes 5 Yes 5 Yes 5 Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 Yes 5 No 5 No No

NJ Yes Yes 2 Yes 2 No 2 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No

NY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No

PA No No 3 No 3 No 3 No 3 No 3 No 3 No 3 No 3 No 3 No 6 No 6 No 6 No No

RI No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

VT No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Yes - Include emission reductions from control measure in modeling inventory

No - Do not include emission reduction from control measure in modeling inventory

N/A – No facilities of this type located in the state

1) Connecticut is now pursuing adoption of model rule for boilers of all sizes at major and non-major sources

2) New Jersey specified a 5 percent reduction in 2009, 10 percent in 2012, and 10 percent in 2018

3) Pennsylvania specified no reductions since sources already covered by statewide NOx RACT regulation

4) Delaware is developing regulation for ICI boilers greater than 200 mmBtu/hour – no plans for regulating 

smaller units

5) New Hampshire specified a 40 percent reduction for 25-50 mmBtu/hour boilers, and a 10 percent reduction for 

natural gas-fired 100-250 mmBtu/hour boilers

6) Pennsylvania specified no reductions since sources in the 5-county Philadelphia area are already covered by the 

Small Sources of NOx regulation and do not plan on expanding the regulation outside of the corridor at this 

time

7) Resolution 06-02 specified the reduction for > 250mmBtu/hour boilers to be the “same as EGUs of similar 

size.” The OTC Commissioners have not yet recommended an emission rate or percent reduction for EGUs. 

As a result, no reductions for ICI boilers > 250 mmBtu/hour were included in the BOTW inventory. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-5

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5.3 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – SO2 Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Commercial & 

Institutional

Heating Oil

ICI Boilers 

(low sulfur fuel)

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT No No Yes No No No

DE No No No No No No

DC No Yes Yes No No No

ME No Yes Yes No No No

MD No Yes Yes No No No

MA No Yes Yes No No No

NH No No Yes No No No

NJ No Yes Yes No No No

NY No Yes Yes No No No

PA No Yes Yes No No No

RI No Yes Yes No No No

VT No No No No No No

Yes - Include emission reductions from control measure in modeling inventory

No - Do not include emission reduction from control measure in modeling inventory
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-6

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5.4 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – VOC Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Adhesives and 

Sealants 

Application

State 2009 2012 2018

CT Yes Yes Yes

DE Yes Yes Yes

DC Yes Yes Yes

ME Yes Yes Yes

MD Yes Yes Yes

MA Yes Yes Yes

NH No Yes Yes

NJ No No 1 No 1

NY

1

Yes Yes Yes

PA Yes Yes Yes

RI Yes Yes Yes

VT No No No

Yes - Include emission reductions from control measure in modeling inventory

No - Do not include emission reduction from control measure in modeling inventory

1) New Jersey indicated that the reductions from the adhesives and sealants application 

control measure should only apply to area source - no reductions for point sources (SCC 4-

02-007-xx) were included due to inventory double-counting issues, not due to rule change 

issues. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-7

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

5.1.1 Adhesives and Sealants Application

The OTC 2006 model rule for adhesives and sealants is based on the reasonably available 

control technology (RACT) and best available retrofit control technology (BARCT) 

determination by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) developed in 1998. 

Adhesive and sealant emission sources are classified as both point sources and area 

sources. About 96 percent of adhesive and sealant VOC emissions in the OTC states fall 

into the area source category. The remaining four percent of the VOC emissions are 

included in the point source inventory.

The emission reduction benefit estimation methodology is based on information developed 

and used by CARB for their RACT/BARCT determination in 1998. For point sources, we 

first identified those sources that were applying adhesives and sealants (using the source 

classification code of 4-02-007-xx, adhesives application). Next, we reviewed the 

MANEVU inventory to determine whether these sources had existing capture and control 

systems. Most of the sources did not have control information in the NIF database. 

However, several sources reported capture and destruction efficiencies in the 70 to 99 

percent range, with a few sources reporting capture and destruction efficiencies of 99+ 

percent. Sources with existing control systems that exceeded an 85 percent overall capture 

and destruction efficiency would comply with the OTC 2006 model rule provision for addon air pollution control equipment; therefore, no additional reductions were calculated for 

these sources. For point sources without add-on control equipment, we used the 64.4 

percent reduction based on the CARB determination. 

5.1.2 Asphalt Production Plants

In Resolution 06-02, the OTC Commissioners recommended that OTC member states 

pursue as necessary and appropriate state-specific rulemakings or other implementation 

methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies that 

would result in about a 35 percent reduction in NOx emissions. The reductions estimated 

for this category only include emissions included in the MANE-VU point source emission 

inventory. Only emissions from major point sources are typically included in the MANEVU point source database. Emissions from non-major sources are not explicitly contained 

in the area source inventory; rather, the emissions from non-major asphalt plants are likely 

lumped together in the general area source industrial and commercial fuel use category. 

Therefore, there is some uncertainty regarding the actual reductions that will occur as since 

minor sources are not specifically identified in the MANE-VU inventory.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-8

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

5.1.3 Cement Kilns

In Resolution 06-02, the OTC Commissioners recommended that OTC member states 

pursue as necessary and appropriate state-specific rulemakings or other implementation 

methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies that 

would result in about a 60 percent reduction in NOx emissions from uncontrolled levels. 

Cement kilns were already included in Phase I of the NOx

5.1.4 Glass and Fiberglass Furnaces

SIP call. Emission reductions 

resulting from the NOx SIP call were accounted for in the 2009 OTB inventory. For the 

cement kilns in Maryland and New York, a default control efficiency value of 25 percent 

was applied to account for the reductions expected from the NOx SIP call. For the cement 

kilns in Pennsylvania, the state provided their best estimates of the actual control 

efficiency expected for each kiln after the NOx SIP Call. There is a cement kiln in Maine, 

but it is not subject to the NOx SIP call. To calculate the additional reductions from the 

OTC 2006 Control Measure, MACTEC back calculated uncontrolled emissions from the 

2009 base year inventory based on the controls applied to account for the NOx SIP Call. 

Once the uncontrolled emissions were calculated, MACTEC applied the 60 percent 

emission reduction guideline recommended by the OTC Commissioners, except for the 

kilns in New York. Staff from New York indicated that a 40 percent emission reduction 

should be used for modeling purposes.

In Resolution 06-02, the OTC Commissioners recommended that OTC member states 

pursue as necessary and appropriate state-specific rulemakings or other implementation 

methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies that

would result in about an 85 percent reduction in NOx emissions from uncontrolled levels. 

The NOx emission reduction benefit was calculated by applying an 85 percent reduction to 

the projected 2009 base inventory, except in New Jersey and New York. New Jersey 

specified a 20 percent NOx reduction from glass furnaces in 2012 and a 35 percent 

reduction in 2018. New York specified a 70 percent NOx reduction from glass furnaces 

beginning in 2009. The estimated 85% reductions does not take into account existing 

controls at the facilities. The OTC states are currently working with the glass industry to 

obtain additional data to better identify the controls already in place. This will allow for a 

better calculation of the emission reduction benefits.

5.1.5 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers

In Resolution 06-02, the OTC Commissioners recommended that OTC member states 

pursue as necessary and appropriate state-specific rulemakings or other implementation 

methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies for ICI 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-9

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

boilers based on guidelines that varied by boiler size and fuel type. Specifically, the 

following guidelines were provided:

NOx Reduction from 2009 Base Emissions by Fuel Type

Boiler Size

(mmBtu/hour) Natural Gas #2 Fuel Oil #4/#6 Fuel Oil Coal

< 25 10 10 10 10

25 to 50 50 50 50 50*

50 to 100 10 10 10 10*

100 to 250 75 40 40 40*

>250 **   ** 

* Resolution 06-02 did not specify a percent reduction for coal; for modeling purposes, the same percent 

reduction specified for #4/#6 fuel oil was used for coal

** Resolution 06-02 specified the reduction for > 250mmBtu/hour boilers to be the “same as EGUs of similar 

size.” The OTC Commissioners have not yet recommended an emission rate or percent reduction for 

EGUs. As a result, no reductions for ICI boilers > 250 mmBtu/hour were included in the BOTW inventory.

Since the above guidelines vary by boiler size and fuel type, the specific percent reduction 

applied to an individual source depends on the SCC and design capacity of the source. The 

SCC identifies the fuel type, while the design capacity identifies the boiler size. In many 

cases, the design capacities in the MANE-VU NIF database were missing. MACTEC used 

the following hierarchy in filling in gaps where design capacities were missing.

• Use the design capacity field from the NIF EU table, if available;

• Use the design capacities provided by State/local agencies to fill in the data gaps 

(Allegheny County, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, Philadephia 

County);

• Use design capacity as reported either the Unit Description field in the NIF EU 

table or the Process Description field from the NIF EP table, if available;

• Use design capacity from the source’s Title V permit, if the Title V permit was online; 

• Use the SCC description to determine the design capacity (for example, SCC 1-02-

006-01 describes a >100 mmBtu/hr natural gas-fired boiler, SCC 1-02-006-02 

describes a 10-100 mmBtu/hr natural gas-fired boiler)

After performing this gap-filling exercise, MACTEC was able to assign over 97 percent of 

the NOx emissions to a specific boiler size range. For the remaining sources where 

MACTEC could not determine the boiler size (which accounted for only 3 percent of the 

NOx emissions), MACTEC assumed that these boilers were < 25 mmBtu/hr.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-10

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

5.1.6 Commercial and Institutional Heating Oil

The BOTW control measure for heating oil is based on NESCAUM’s report entitled “Low 

Sulfur Heating Oil in the Northeast States: An Overview of Benefits, Costs and 

Implementation Issues.” NESCAUM estimates that reducing the sulfur content of heating 

oil from 2,500 ppm to 500 ppm lowers SO2 emissions by 75 percent, PM emissions by 80 

percent, NOx emissions by 10 percent. The 500 ppm sulfur heating oil is not expected to 

available on a widespread basis until 2012 at the earliest. These percent reductions were 

applied to commercial distillate oil category (SCC 1-03-005-xx and 1-05-002-05). These 

percent reductions were applied based on the state’s recommendations in the matrix which 

identifies control measures to include and in which years the control measure should be 

accounted for in the modeling inventory.

5.1.7 BOTW NonEGU Point Source NIF, SMOKE, and Summary Files

The Version 3.1 file names and descriptions delivered to MARAMA are shown in Table 5-

5.

Table E-1 shows the anticipated percent reductions by SCC and year for the nonEGU point 

source BOTW control measures. 

5.1.8 BOTW NonEGU Point Source Emission Summaries

Emission summaries by state, year, and pollutant are presented in Tables 5-6 through 5-12

for CO, NH3, NOx, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, SO2, and VOC, respectively. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-11

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-5 BOTW NonEGU Point Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

File Name Date Description

MANEVU_BOTW2009_NonEGU_NIFV3_1.mdb Dec. 4, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2009 BOTW 

nonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU_BOTW2012_NonEGU_NIFV3_1.mdb Dec. 4, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2012 BOTW 

nonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU_BOTW2018_NonEGU_NIFV3_1.mdb Dec. 4, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2018 BOTW 

nonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU_BOTW2009_NonEGU_IDAV3_1.txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2009 BOTW 

nonEGU source inventory in 

SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU_BOTW2012_NonEGU_IDAV3_1.txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2012 BOTW 

nonEGU source inventory in 

SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU_BOTW2018_NonEGU_IDA3V_1.txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3.1 of 2018 BOTW 

nonEGU source inventory in 

SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU OTB BOTW NonEGU V3_1 State 

Summary.xls

Nov. 22, 2006 Spreadsheet with state totals by 

pollutant for all nonEGU 

sources 

MANEVU OTB BOTW NonEGU V3_1 State SCC 

Summary.xls

Dec. 4, 2006 Spreadsheet with SCC totals by 

state and pollutant for all 

nonEGU sources.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-12

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-6 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual CO Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 2,157 2,251 2,251 2,306 2,306 2,415 2,415

DE 8,812 9,037 9,037 8,748 8,748 8,651 8,651

DC 247 283 283 299 299 327 327

ME 9,043 10,147 10,147 10,467 10,467 11,433 11,433

MD 94,536 104,012 104,012 111,174 111,174 141,342 141,342

MA 10,793 12,027 12,027 12,552 12,552 13,426 13,426

NH 774 858 858 871 871 907 907

NJ 8,209 10,076 10,076 10,806 10,806 12,244 12,244

NY 53,259 61,411 61,411 65,541 65,541 78,876 78,876

PA 105,815 116,430 116,430 121,251 121,251 140,908 140,908

RI 1,712 1,764 1,764 1,821 1,821 1,927 1,927

VT 220 250 250 254 254 267 267

Total 295,577 328,546 328,546 346,090 346,090 412,723 412,723

No BOTW controls were considered for CO.

0

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

125,000

150,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-13

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-7 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DE 153 145 145 138 138 134 134

DC 4 5 5 5 5 5 5

ME 700 796 796 809 809 859 859

MD 305 347 347 366 366 410 410

MA 462 510 510 521 521 563 563

NH 37 46 46 50 50 60 60

NJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NY 1,027 1,081 1,081 1,128 1,128 1,296 1,296

PA 1,170 1,307 1,307 1,363 1,363 1,591 1,591

RI 58 64 64 68 68 68 68

VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3,916 4,301 4,301 4,448 4,448 4,986 4,986

No BOTW controls were considered for NH3.

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-14

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-8 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NOx Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 6,773 7,236 6,820 7,465 7,047 7,921 7,501

DE 4,372 4,076 4,076 4,135 4,135 4,246 4,246

DC 480 548 548 577 577 627 627

ME 12,108 14,285 12,914 14,661 13,183 15,753 14,137

MD 21,940 19,401 16,015 20,399 16,819 22,797 18,888

MA 18,292 20,603 20,047 21,372 20,768 23,040 22,301

NH 1,188 1,384 1,120 1,394 1,131 1,435 1,169

NJ 15,812 16,498 16,463 17,091 15,901 18,805 17,464

NY 34,253 33,648 28,529 34,586 29,256 37,133 31,305

PA 89,136 89,932 76,215 93,526 72,779 103,137 79,186

RI 2,308 2,449 2,449 2,471 2,471 2,442 2,442

VT 386 462 462 460 460 466 466

Total 207,048 210,522 185,658 218,137 184,527 237,802 199,732

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-15

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-9 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 990 1,035 1,035 1,058 1,058 1,106 1,104

DE 1,820 1,486 1,486 1,475 1,475 1,487 1,487

DC 157 178 178 186 182 198 194

ME 6,120 7,088 7,088 7,133 7,114 7,496 7,477

MD 4,739 4,797 4,797 5,040 5,039 5,828 5,827

MA 4,212 5,006 5,006 5,088 5,004 5,314 5,227

NH 918 1,084 1,084 1,097 1,097 1,129 1,129

NJ 3,439 4,205 4,205 4,417 4,412 4,959 4,953

NY 5,072 5,221 5,221 5,444 5,395 6,098 6,048

PA 23,282 25,169 25,169 26,307 26,258 29,516 29,466

RI 296 333 333 331 318 330 316

VT 235 267 267 272 272 296 296

Total 51,280 55,869 55,869 57,848 57,624 63,757 63,524

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-16

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-10 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 822 871 871 894 894 939 937

DE 1,606 1,256 1,256 1,245 1,245 1,254 1,254

DC 128 145 145 152 149 164 161

ME 4,899 5,675 5,675 5,690 5,678 5,935 5,922

MD 2,772 2,861 2,861 3,011 3,010 3,503 3,501

MA 2,953 3,554 3,554 3,574 3,510 3,660 3,594

NH 857 1,008 1,008 1,021 1,021 1,052 1,052

NJ 2,947 3,588 3,588 3,764 3,760 4,234 4,230

NY 3,355 3,535 3,535 3,688 3,646 4,161 4,117

PA 12,360 13,578 13,578 14,159 14,114 15,878 15,831

RI 180 200 200 198 188 194 184

VT 198 226 226 229 229 246 246

Total 33,077 36,497 36,497 37,625 37,444 41,220 41,029

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-17

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-11 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 2,438 2,528 2,528 2,567 2,567 2,644 2,596

DE 35,706 7,117 7,117 7,401 7,401 7,610 7,610

DC 618 707 707 735 533 780 554

ME 14,412 18,656 18,656 18,492 18,393 18,794 18,692

MD 34,193 34,223 34,223 35,373 35,342 38,921 38,886

MA 14,766 18,185 18,185 18,442 17,305 18,955 17,778

NH 2,436 3,099 3,099 3,098 3,098 3,114 3,099

NJ 9,797 7,141 7,141 7,234 7,196 7,855 7,816

NY 58,227 62,922 62,922 64,484 64,432 67,545 67,491

PA 88,259 90,735 90,735 93,441 93,206 99,924 99,681

RI 2,651 3,163 3,163 3,182 3,018 3,164 3,000

VT 874 1,182 1,182 1,147 1,147 1,127 1,127

Total 264,377 249,658 249,658 255,596 253,638 270,433 268,330

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-18

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-12 NonEGU Point Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual VOC Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 4,604 4,114 4,111 4,152 4,149 4,230 4,227

DE 4,645 2,987 2,981 2,311 2,305 1,993 1,987

DC 69 72 72 75 75 85 85

ME 4,477 4,740 4,740 4,985 4,985 5,709 5,708

MD 5,676 5,297 5,279 5,578 5,559 6,301 6,279

MA 7,794 8,381 8,273 9,061 8,940 10,564 10,418

NH 1,459 1,060 1,005 1,132 1,069 1,294 1,219

NJ 13,318 16,702 16,702 17,621 17,621 19,915 19,915

NY 9,933 10,157 10,141 10,750 10,732 12,354 12,333

PA 36,326 35,875 35,548 38,162 37,795 44,537 44,085

RI 1,898 1,640 1,628 1,695 1,683 1,812 1,799

VT 1,079 1,254 1,238 1,365 1,347 1,730 1,707

Total 91,278 92,279 91,718 96,887 96,260 110,524 109,762

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-19

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

5.2 AREA SOURCES

This Section describes the analysis of the OTC and MANE-VU control measures to reduce 

emissions from area sources. The control measures included in this analysis reduce 

emissions for the following pollutants and area source categories: 

• NOx measures: ICI boilers (natural gas, #2 fuel oil, #4/#6 fuel oil, and coal) and 

residential and commercial home heating oil; 

• Primary PM10 and PM2.5 measures: residential and commercial home heating oil; 

• SO2 measures: residential and commercial home heating oil, and ICI boilers 

(distillate oil).

• VOC measures: adhesives and sealants, emulsified and cutback asphalt paving, 

consumer products, and portable fuel containers; 

For the MANE-VU modeling inventory, each state was asked to complete a matrix identify 

which control measures to include and in which years the control measure should be 

applied. Tables 5.13, 5.14, and 5.15 summarize the staff recommendations for control 

measures to include in the BOTW regional modeling inventory for NOx, SO2, and VOC 

respectively. The following subsections describe the emission reductions anticipated for 

each of the area source control measures.

5.2.1 Adhesives and Sealants

The OTC 2006 model rule for adhesives and sealants is based on the reasonably available 

control technology (RACT) and best available retrofit control technology (BARCT) 

determination by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) developed in 1998. 

Adhesive and sealant emission sources are classified as both point sources and area 

sources. About 96 percent of adhesive and sealant VOC emissions in the OTC states fall 

into the area source category. The remaining four percent of the VOC emissions are 

included in the point source inventory.

The emission reduction benefit estimation methodology for area sources is based on 

information developed and used by CARB for their RACT/BARCT determination in 1998. 

CARB estimates that the total industrial adhesive and sealant emissions in California to be 

about 45 tons per day (tpd). Solvent-based adhesive and sealant emissions are estimated to 

be about 35 tpd of VOC and water-based adhesive and sealant emissions are about 10 tpd 

of VOC. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-20

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5.13 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW 

Regional Modeling – NOx Area Sources

ICI Boilers

< 25 mmBTU/hour

ICI Boilers

25-50 mmBtu/hour

ICI Boilers

50-100 mmBtu/hour

Residential and 

Commercial 

Home Heating Oil

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes

DE No No No No No No No No No No No No

DC No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

ME No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

MD No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

MA No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

NH No No No No No No No No No No No Yes

NJ No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

NY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

PA No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

RI No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

VT No 1 No No No No No No No No No No No

Yes - Include emission reductions from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventory

No - Do not include emission reduction from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventory
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-21

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5.14 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures 

to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling – SO2 Area Sources

ICI Boilers

< 25 mmBTU/hour

ICI Boilers

25-50 mmBtu/hour

ICI Boilers

50-100 mmBtu/hour

Residential Home 

Heating Oil

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT No No No No No No No No No No No Yes

DE No No No No No No No No No No No No

DC No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

ME No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

MD No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

MA No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

NH No No No No No No No No No No No Yes

NJ No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

NY No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

PA No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

RI No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

VT No 1 No No No No No No No No No No No

Yes - Include emission reductions from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventory

No - Do not include emission reduction from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventory
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-22

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5.15 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures 

to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling – VOC Area Sources

Adhesives and 

Sealants

Emulsified and 

Cutback Asphalt 

Paving

Consumer Products Portable Fuel 

Containers

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

DE Yes Yes Yes No No 2 No 2 Yes 2 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

DC Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

ME Yes Yes Yes No No 3 No 3 Yes 3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

MD Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

MA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

NH No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

NJ Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

NY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

PA Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

RI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

VT No 1 No No No No No No No No No No No

Yes - Include emission reductions from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventory

No - Do not include emission reduction from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventory

1) Vermont indicated that the modeling inventory should not reflect anything beyond the 2002 OTC 

control level for these source categories in Vermont. 

2) Delaware’s existing asphalt paving regulations are more stringent than the OTC 2006 control 

measure.

3) Maine has not yet determined whether to include emission reductions from the OTC 2006 control 

measure for asphalt paving. Maine’s inventory includes emissions only from cutback asphalt; no 

emissions are reported for emulsified asphalt.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-23

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

CARB estimated that emission reductions achieved by statewide compliance with the VOC 

limits in the RACT/BARCT determination will range from approximately 29 to 35 tpd 

(CARB 1998, pg. 18). These emission reductions correspond to a 64.4 to 77.8 percent 

reduction from uncontrolled levels. For OTC modeling purposes, we used the lower end 

of this range (i.e., 64.4 percent reduction) to estimate the emission benefit for area sources 

due to the OTC 2006 model rule. 

5.2.2 Asphalt Paving

The OTC current guideline for asphalt paving calls for a complete ban on the use of 

cutback asphalt during the ozone season and limits the VOC content of emulsified asphalt 

to two percent or less. The proposal is still under evaluation. A 20 percent reduction in 

emissions from emulsified asphalt was assumed for the modeling inventory. 

The current regulations in all MANE-VU states generally ban the use of cutback asphalt 

during the ozone season. In some states, there are a few exemptions from the ban that 

allow for the use of cutback during the ozone season. It has not yet been determined 

whether states will modify their cutback asphalt rules to eliminate the exemptions. Since 

the VOC emissions from the use of cutback asphalt during the ozone season are generally 

very small, MACTEC assumed that there will be no additional emission reductions from 

the use of cutback asphalt during the ozone season.

The emission reductions resulting from the two percent VOC content limit on emulsified 

asphalt depend on the baseline VOC content of emulsified asphalt. The baseline VOC 

content may range from 0 to 12 percent. New Jersey used a VOC content of 8 percent in 

their baseline emission calculations (based on the 8 percent limit in their current rule). 

Reducing the VOC content to 2 percent in New Jersey will result in a 75 percent reduction. 

Delaware already bans the use of emulsified asphalt that contains any VOC, so there is no 

reduction in Delaware. Several other states used an average VOC content of 2.5 percent 

when developing their emission inventory. Thus, reducing the average VOC content from 

2.5 percent to 2.0 percent results in a 20 percent reduction in VOC emissions. For States 

that did not supply a baseline VOC content for asphalt paving, we used the 20 percent 

reduction in VOC emissions from emulsified asphalt paving during the ozone season. 

5.2.3 Consumer Products

The OTC 2006 model rule will modify the OTC 2001 model rule based on amendments 

adopted by CARB in July 2005. The emission reduction benefit estimation methodology 

is based on information developed by CARB. CARB estimates 6.05 tons per day of VOC 

reduced from their July 2005 amendments (CARB 2004, pg. 8), excluding the benefits 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-24

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

from the two products (anti-static products and shaving gels) with compliance dates in 

2008 or 2009. This equates to about 2,208 tons per year. The population of California as 

of July 1, 2005 is 36,132,147 (Census 2006). On a per capita basis, the emission reduction 

from the CARB July 2005 amendments equals 0.122 lbs/capita. 

Since the OTC’s 2006 control measure is very similar to the CARB July 2005 amendments 

(with the exclusion of the anti-static products and shaving gel 2008/2009 limits), the per 

capita emission reductions are expected to be the same in the OTR. The per capita factor 

after the implementation of the OTC 2001 model rule is 6.06 lbs/capita (Pechan 2001, pg. 

8). The percentage reduction from the OTC’s 2006 control measure was computed as 

shown below:

Current OTC Emission Factor = 6.06 lbs/capita

Benefit from CARB 2005 amendments = 0.122 lbs/capita

Percent Reduction =

=

100%*(1 - (6.06 – 0.122)/6.06)

2.0%

The 2.0% reduction will be applied to all states except Vermont, which indicated that they 

do not want the modeling inventory to reflect anything beyond the 2002 OTC control level 

for consumer products in Vermont. 

5.2.4 Portable Fuel Containers

The OTC 2006 model rule will modify the OTC 2001 model rule based on amendments 

adopted by CARB in 2006. Estimated emission reductions were based on information 

compiled by CARB to support their recent amendments. CARB estimated that PFC 

emissions in 2015 will be 31.9 tpd in California with no additional controls or amendments 

to the 2000 PFC rules. CARB further estimates that the 2006 amendment will reduce 

emission from PFCs by 18.4 tpd in 2015 in California compared to the 2000 PFC 

regulations. Thus, at full implementation, the expected incremental reduction is 

approximately 58 percent, after an estimated 75 percent reduction from the original 2000 

rule (CARB later adjusted the reduction to 65 percent due to unanticipated problems with 

spillage from the new cans). 

The OTC calculations assume that States will adopt the rule by July 2007 and will provide 

manufacturers one year from the date of the rule to comply. Thus, new compliant PFCs 

will not be on the market until July 2008. Assuming a 10-year turnover to compliant cans, 

only 10 percent of the existing inventory of PFCs will comply with the new requirements 

in the summer of 2009. Therefore, only 10 percent of the full emission benefit estimated 

by CARB will occur by 2009 – the incremental reduction will be about 5.8 percent in 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-25

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

2009. In 2012, there will be a 40 percent turnover to compliant cans, resulting in an 

incremental reductions of about 23.2 percent. By 2018, the will be 100 percent penetration 

to compliant PFCs, resulting in an incremental reduction of 58 percent in 2018.

The emission reductions from the 2006 OTC PFC model rule were calculated only for the 

emissions accounted for in the area source inventory. Additional benefits (not estimated 

for this report) would be expected from equipment refueling vapor displacement and 

spillage that is accounted for in the nonroad inventory.

5.2.5 Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers

In Resolution 06-02, the OTC Commissioners recommended that OTC member states 

pursue as necessary and appropriate state-specific rulemakings or other implementation 

methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies for ICI 

boilers based on guidelines that varied by boiler size and fuel type. Specifically, the 

following guidelines were provided:

NOx Reduction from 2009 Base Emissions by Fuel Type

Boiler Size

(mmBtu/hour) Natural Gas #2 Fuel Oil #4/#6 Fuel Oil Coal

< 25 10 10 10 10

25 to 50 50 50 50 50*

50 to 100 10 10 10 10*

100 to 250 75 40 40 40*

>250 **   ** 

* Resolution 06-02 did not specify a percent reduction for coal; for modeling purposes, the same percent 

reduction specified for #4/#6 fuel oil was used for coal

** Resolution 06-02 specified the reduction for > 250mmBtu/hour boilers to be the “same as EGUs of similar 

size.” The OTC Commissioners have not yet recommended an emission rate or percent reduction for 

EGUs. As a result, no reductions for ICI boilers > 250 mmBtu/hour were included in the BOTW inventory.

Since the above guidelines vary by boiler size and fuel type, the specific percent reduction 

applied to an area source category depends on the SCC and design capacity of the source. 

The SCC identifies the fuel type (for example, SCC 21-02-004-xxx describes distillate oilfired industrial boilers, SCC 21-02-006-xxx describes natural gas-fired industrial boilers). 

The area source inventory does not contain any information on the sizes of the units 

included in the inventories. To apportion area source emissions to the boiler size ranges 

listed above, MACTEC used data from the Characterization of the U.S. 

Industrial/Commercial Boiler Population (May 2005, Oak Ridge National Laboratory). 

We used the national estimates of boiler capacity by size from Table ES-1 of the Oak 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-26

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Ridge report to calculate the percentage of total boiler capacity in each size range. Since 

the Oak Ridge report distinguished between industrial boilers and commercial/institutional 

boilers, we developed separate profiles for industrial boilers and for 

commercial/institutional boilers. We used these boiler size profiles to calculate weighted 

average percent reductions industrial boilers by fuel type and commercial/institutional 

boilers by fuel type. 

5.2.6 Residential and Commercial Heating Oil

The BOTW control measure for heating oil is based on NESCAUM’s report entitled “Low 

Sulfur Heating Oil in the Northeast States: An Overview of Benefits, Costs and 

Implementation Issues.” NESCAUM estimates that reducing the sulfur content of heating 

oil from 2,000 ppm to 500 ppm lowers SO2 emissions by 75 percent, PM emissions by 80 

percent, NOx emissions by 10 percent. The 500 ppm sulfur heating oil is not expected to 

available on a widespread basis until 2012 at the earliest. These percent reductions were 

applied to residential distillate oil category (SCC 21-04-004-xxx) and commercial distillate 

oil category (SCC 21-03-004-xxx). These percent reductions were applied based on the 

state’s recommendations in the matrix which identifies control measures to include and in 

which years the control measure should be accounted for in the modeling inventory.

5.2.7 BOTW Area Source NIF, SMOKE, and Summary Files

The Version 3 file names and descriptions delivered to MARAMA are shown in Table 5-

16.

Table E-1 shows the anticipated percent reductions by SCC and year for the nonEGU point 

source BOTW control measures. 

5.2.8 BOTW Area Source Emission Summaries

Emission summaries by state, year, and pollutant are presented in Tables 5-17 through 5-

23 for CO, NH3, NOx, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, SO2, and VOC, respectively. 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-27

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-16 BOTW Area Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

File Name Date Description

MANEVU_BOTW2009_Area_NIFV3_2.mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2009 BOTW 

area source NIF inventory

MANEVU_BOTW2012_Area_NIFV3_2.mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2012 BOTW 

area source NIF inventory

MANEVU_BOTW2018_Area_NIFV3_2.mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2018 BOTW 

area source NIF inventory

MANEVU_BOTW2009_Area_IDAV3_2.txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2009 BOTW 

area source inventory in 

SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU_BOTW2012_Area_IDAV3_2.txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2012 BOTW 

area source inventory in 

SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU_BOTW2018_Area_IDA3V_2.txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3.2 of 2018 BOTW 

area source inventory in 

SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU OTB BOTW Area V3_2 State Summary.xls Nov. 8, 2006 Spreadsheet with state totals by 

pollutant for all area sources 

MANEVU OTB BOTW Area V3_2 State SCC 

Summary.xls

Nov. 8, 2006 Spreadsheet with SCC totals by 

state and pollutant for all area 

sources.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-28

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-17 Area Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual CO Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 70,198 65,865 65,865 63,874 63,874 59,797 59,797

DE 14,052 15,395 15,395 15,233 15,233 14,864 14,864

DC 2,300 2,417 2,417 2,460 2,460 2,512 2,512

ME 109,223 102,743 102,743 99,877 99,877 94,181 94,181

MD 141,178 143,653 143,653 144,233 144,233 144,649 144,649

MA 137,496 132,797 132,797 130,255 130,255 125,205 125,205

NH 79,647 76,504 76,504 75,319 75,319 73,038 73,038

NJ 97,657 90,432 90,432 88,048 88,048 83,119 83,119

NY 356,254 336,576 336,576 327,118 327,118 307,659 307,659

PA 266,935 266,887 266,887 264,012 264,012 257,396 257,396

RI 8,007 8,007 8,007 8,026 8,026 8,024 8,024

VT 43,849 42,683 42,683 42,172 42,172 41,283 41,283

Total 1,326,796 1,283,959 1,283,959 1,260,627 1,260,627 1,211,727 1,211,727

No BOTW controls were considered for CO.

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-29

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-18 Area Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 5,318 5,208 5,208 5,156 5,156 5,061 5,061

DE 13,279 13,316 13,316 13,328 13,328 13,342 13,342

DC 14 16 16 16 16 17 17

ME 8,747 10,453 10,453 11,116 11,116 12,312 12,312

MD 25,834 31,879 31,879 34,222 34,222 38,155 38,155

MA 18,809 19,131 19,131 19,275 19,275 19,552 19,552

NH 2,158 2,466 2,466 2,584 2,584 2,789 2,789

NJ 17,572 19,457 19,457 20,154 20,154 21,435 21,435

NY 67,422 81,626 81,626 87,116 87,116 96,078 96,078

PA 79,911 98,281 98,281 105,418 105,418 117,400 117,400

RI 883 945 945 972 972 1,025 1,025

VT 9,848 12,156 12,156 13,062 13,062 14,580 14,580

Total 249,795 294,934 294,934 312,419 312,419 341,746 341,746

No BOTW controls were considered for NH3.

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-30

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-19 Area Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NOx Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 12,689 13,173 12,245 13,342 12,389 13,388 11,795

DE 2,608 2,821 2,821 2,913 2,913 3,014 3,014

DC 1,644 1,961 1,961 2,081 2,052 2,259 2,229

ME 7,360 7,477 7,477 7,486 7,095 7,424 7,036

MD 15,678 16,858 16,858 17,315 17,007 18,073 17,746

MA 34,281 35,732 35,732 36,331 35,321 37,187 36,199

NH 10,960 11,879 11,879 12,055 12,055 12,430 12,180

NJ 26,692 24,032 24,032 23,981 21,976 23,660 21,684

NY 98,803 106,375 95,190 107,673 92,935 108,444 93,639

PA 47,591 50,162 50,162 50,793 49,773 50,829 49,829

RI 3,886 4,149 4,149 4,260 4,112 4,397 4,249

VT 3,208 3,419 3,419 3,429 3,429 3,430 3,430

Total 265,400 278,038 265,925 281,659 261,057 284,535 263,030

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-31

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-20 Area Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM10-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 48,281 48,970 48,970 49,004 49,004 49,479 48,734

DE 13,039 13,928 13,928 14,236 14,236 14,844 14,844

DC 3,269 3,511 3,511 3,605 3,547 3,825 3,762

ME 168,953 175,979 175,979 179,689 179,004 189,619 188,928

MD 95,060 105,944 105,944 110,141 109,829 117,396 117,066

MA 192,860 198,668 198,668 200,692 200,215 204,922 204,456

NH 43,328 46,060 46,060 47,187 47,187 49,801 49,544

NJ 61,601 61,684 61,684 61,284 60,916 60,880 60,519

NY 369,595 382,124 382,124 385,925 383,234 392,027 389,385

PA 391,897 421,235 421,235 432,844 431,787 454,970 453,934

RI 8,295 8,962 8,962 9,244 8,976 9,797 9,514

VT 56,131 60,521 60,521 62,465 62,465 66,916 66,916

Total 1,452,309 1,527,586 1,527,586 1,556,316 1,550,400 1,614,476 1,607,602

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-32

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-21 Area Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM25-PRI Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 14,247 13,766 13,766 13,517 13,517 13,033 12,366

DE 3,204 3,387 3,387 3,403 3,403 3,426 3,426

DC 805 860 860 879 827 917 860

ME 32,774 33,026 33,026 33,189 32,576 33,820 33,201

MD 27,318 28,923 28,923 29,508 29,228 30,449 30,153

MA 42,083 43,121 43,121 43,186 42,820 43,438 43,080

NH 17,532 17,965 17,965 18,050 18,050 18,316 18,087

NJ 19,350 18,590 18,590 18,271 17,924 17,653 17,313

NY 87,154 87,576 87,576 87,260 85,011 86,422 84,211

PA 74,925 79,169 79,169 80,728 79,775 83,570 82,637

RI 2,064 2,184 2,184 2,232 1,996 2,316 2,068

VT 11,065 11,482 11,482 11,652 11,652 12,059 12,059

Total 332,521 340,049 340,049 341,875 336,779 345,419 339,461

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-33

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-22 Area Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 12,418 12,581 12,581 12,604 12,604 12,184 3,398

DE 1,588 1,599 1,599 1,602 1,602 1,545 1,545

DC 1,337 1,487 1,487 1,541 499 1,632 522

ME 13,149 13,776 13,776 13,846 4,897 13,901 4,940

MD 12,393 13,685 13,685 14,074 8,762 14,741 9,118

MA 25,488 25,961 25,961 26,029 8,414 25,570 8,357

NH 7,072 7,463 7,463 7,470 7,470 7,421 3,118

NJ 10,744 10,672 10,672 10,697 4,435 10,510 4,374

NY 130,409 139,589 139,589 140,154 98,160 141,408 100,452

PA 63,679 67,535 67,535 67,446 49,212 66,363 48,475

RI 4,557 5,024 5,024 5,189 1,316 5,398 1,368

VT 4,087 4,646 4,646 4,687 4,687 4,764 4,764

Total 286,921 304,018 304,018 305,339 202,058 305,437 190,431

0

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

125,000

150,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-34

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table 5-23 Area Sources

OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual VOC Emission Projections 

(tons per year)

2002

2009 

OTB/W

2009 

BOTW

2012 

OTB/W

2012 

BOTW

2018 

OTB/W

2018 

BOTW

CT 87,302 75,693 73,738 73,560 71,249 71,274 68,395

DE 15,519 14,245 13,794 13,943 13,408 13,744 13,066

DC 6,432 5,420 5,300 5,352 5,144 5,255 4,991

ME 100,621 91,910 90,869 91,667 90,457 92,410 90,866

MD 120,254 110,385 107,527 108,067 104,400 110,046 104,615

MA 162,145 148,625 145,059 145,674 140,848 140,558 134,963

NH 65,370 63,069 61,860 63,356 61,913 64,368 62,649

NJ 167,882 147,617 143,089 143,752 138,646 139,626 134,089

NY 507,292 462,811 451,669 456,856 443,940 457,421 440,892

PA 240,785 228,444 219,733 230,393 219,897 243,421 230,011

RI 31,402 26,695 26,572 25,548 25,315 23,561 23,305

VT 23,265 24,068 24,068 24,635 24,634 26,198 26,197

Total 1,528,269 1,398,982 1,363,278 1,382,803 1,339,851 1,387,882 1,334,039

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

550,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT

Emissions (tpy)

2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTW
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Section 5 – Beyond-On-The-Way Emission Inventory Page 5-35

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

5.3 Nonroad Mobile Sources

In the June 2007 MOU, the OTC Commissioners recommended that states pursue statespecific rulemakings for one nonroad source categories – portable fuel containers. The 

OTC 2006 control measure for portable fuel containers will result in addition VOC 

emission reduction from the refueling of nonroad equipment. However, these reductions 

could not be estimated due to resource and time constraints.

5.4 Electric Generating Units

In the June 2008 Statement on EGUs, the OTC Commissioners directed OTC staff to 

complete an evaluation and recommendations for a program beyond CAIR that includes 

strategies to address the base, intermediate and peak load emissions. No specific emission 

reduction targets were identified. States specified that no additional reductions from EGUs 

be included in the BOTW inventory.

5.5 Onroad Mobile Sources

In Resolution 06-02, the OTC Commissioners recommended that the OTC member states 

pursue a region fuel program consistent with the Energy Act of 2005. No specific 

emission reduction targets were identified. States specified that no additional reductions 

from onroad mobile sources be included in the BOTW inventory. 

In the June 2007 MOU, the OTC Commissioners recommended that states pursue statespecific rulemakings to implement a mandatory diesel engine chip reflash program. It is 

our understanding that the emission reductions from the diesel engine chip reflash program 

are already accounted for in MANE-VU’s OTB emission inventory.
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix A – Non EGU Point Source Growth Factors Page A-1

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Appendix A – NonEGU Point Source Growth Factors

Table A-1 Connecticut Growth Factors by SIC Code

SIC GF_02_09 GF_02_12 GF_02_18 CTDOL_CAT

0181 1.0019 1.0027 1.0042 Agricultural, Crop Production

1422 0.9400 0.9143 0.8629 Mining

1429 0.9400 0.9143 0.8629 Mining

2051 0.9355 0.9079 0.8526 Manufacturing, Food

2096 0.9355 0.9079 0.8526 Manufacturing, Food

2261 0.9254 0.8934 0.8295 Manufacturing, Textile Product Mills

2262 0.9254 0.8934 0.8295 Manufacturing, Textile Product Mills

2284 0.9254 0.8934 0.8295 Manufacturing, Textile Product Mills

2298 0.9254 0.8934 0.8295 Manufacturing, Textile Product Mills

2434 1.0679 1.0969 1.1551 Manufacturing, Wood Products

2522 1.0435 1.0621 1.0994 Manufacturing, Furniture & Related

2541 1.0679 1.0969 1.1551 Manufacturing, Wood Products

2621 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2631 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2652 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2653 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2672 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2673 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2711 0.8386 0.7695 0.6312 Manufacturing, Printing & Related Activ

2752 0.8386 0.7695 0.6312 Manufacturing, Printing & Related Activ

2754 0.8386 0.7695 0.6312 Manufacturing, Printing & Related Activ

2759 0.8386 0.7695 0.6312 Manufacturing, Printing & Related Activ

2821 1.1024 1.1464 1.2342 Manufacturing, Chemical

2833 1.1024 1.1464 1.2342 Manufacturing, Chemical

2869 1.1024 1.1464 1.2342 Manufacturing, Chemical

2875 1.1024 1.1464 1.2342 Manufacturing, Chemical

3052 0.9591 0.9416 0.9066 Manufacturing, Plastic & Rubber Product

3069 0.9591 0.9416 0.9066 Manufacturing, Plastic & Rubber Product

3081 0.9591 0.9416 0.9066 Manufacturing, Plastic & Rubber Product

3086 0.9591 0.9416 0.9066 Manufacturing, Plastic & Rubber Product

3087 0.9591 0.9416 0.9066 Manufacturing, Plastic & Rubber Product

3272 0.9841 0.9772 0.9636 Manufacturing, Miscellaneous

3312 0.8713 0.8162 0.7059 Manufacturing, Primary Metal

3351 0.8713 0.8162 0.7059 Manufacturing, Primary Metal

3357 0.8713 0.8162 0.7059 Manufacturing, Primary Metal

3423 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3429 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3444 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3469 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3471 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3479 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3497 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3562 0.8778 0.8254 0.7206 Manufacturing, Machinery
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix A – Non EGU Point Source Growth Factors Page A-2

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SIC GF_02_09 GF_02_12 GF_02_18 CTDOL_CAT

3569 0.8778 0.8254 0.7206 Manufacturing, Machinery

3579 0.8452 0.7788 0.6461 Manufacturing, Computer & Electronic Eq

3634 0.9149 0.8784 0.8054 Manufacturing, Electrical Equipment, Ap

3675 0.9149 0.8784 0.8054 Manufacturing, Electrical Equipment, Ap

3714 0.9705 0.9578 0.9326 Manufacturing, Transportation Equipment

3721 0.9705 0.9578 0.9326 Manufacturing, Transportation Equipment

3724 0.9705 0.9578 0.9326 Manufacturing, Transportation Equipment

3728 0.9705 0.9578 0.9326 Manufacturing, Transportation Equipment

3731 0.9705 0.9578 0.9326 Manufacturing, Transportation Equipment

3827 0.9841 0.9772 0.9636 Manufacturing, Miscellaneous

3949 0.9841 0.9772 0.9636 Manufacturing, Miscellaneous

3951 0.9841 0.9772 0.9636 Manufacturing, Miscellaneous

4226 1.0921 1.1316 1.2106 Transportation & Warehousing, Warehousi

4911 0.9550 0.9358 0.8972 Utilities

4922 0.9550 0.9358 0.8972 Utilities

4924 0.9550 0.9358 0.8972 Utilities

4931 1.1439 1.2056 1.3290 Waste Management & Remediation Services

4952 1.1439 1.2056 1.3290 Waste Management & Remediation Services

4953 1.1439 1.2056 1.3290 Waste Management & Remediation Services

4961 0.9550 0.9358 0.8972 Utilities

5171 1.0605 1.0864 1.1382 Wholesale Trade, Nondurable Goods

6036 1.0569 1.0814 1.1302 Finance & Insurance

6512 1.0197 1.0282 1.0451 Real Estate & Rental & Leasing

6513 1.0197 1.0282 1.0451 Real Estate & Rental & Leasing

7389 1.0569 1.0814 1.1302 Finance & Insurance

8051 1.0824 1.1177 1.1883 Health Care & Social Assistance, Nursin

8062 1.0583 1.0833 1.1334 Health Care & Social Assistance, Hospit

8063 1.0583 1.0833 1.1334 Health Care & Social Assistance, Hospit

8211 1.0642 1.0918 1.1468 Educational Services

8221 1.0642 1.0918 1.1468 Educational Services

8631 1.0642 1.0918 1.1468 Educational Services

8734 1.1189 1.1699 1.2718 Professional, Scientific, and Technical

9223 1.0185 1.0264 1.0423 Government

9511 1.0185 1.0264 1.0423 Government

9621 1.0185 1.0264 1.0423 Government

9711 1.0185 1.0264 1.0423 Government

3900 0.9841 0.9772 0.9636 Manufacturing, Miscellaneous

5093 1.0527 1.0754 1.1206 Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods

4200 0.9871 0.9815 0.9705 Transportation & Warehousing, Truck Tra
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix A – Non EGU Point Source Growth Factors Page A-3

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table A-2 Non-EGU Point Source Growth Factors by SCC Code

See Electronic File: MANE-VU_NonEGU_gf_scc.xls

This table contains 12,791 records with NonEGU point source growth factors by county and SCC. 

The format for the tables is as follows: 

Column A – County FIPS code

Column B – Source Classification Code (SCC)

Column C – EGAS_02_09 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column D – AEO5_02_09 this is the DOE AEO 2005 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column E – ST_02_09 this is the state-supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column F – GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2009 (it 

is the state-supplied factor, if available; if no state-supplied factor, then it is the AEO2005 

factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column G – EGAS_02_12 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column H – AEO5_02_12 this is the DOE AEO 2005 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column I – ST_02_12 this is the state-supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column J – GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2012 (it 

is the state-supplied factor, if available; if no state-supplied factor, then it is the AEO2005 

factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column K – EGAS_02_18 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018

Column J – AEO5_02_18 this is the DOE AEO 2005 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018

Column M– ST_02_18 this is the state-supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018 

Column N – GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2012 (it 

is the state-supplied factor, if available; if no state-supplied factor, then it is the AEO2005 

factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column O – SCC description
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-1

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Appendix B – NonEGU Point Source Control Factors

Table B-1 NonEGU Emission Units Affected by the NOx SIP Call Phase I

FIPS SITE ID Facility Name EU ID

Ozone 

Season

Allowance

(tpy)

Prorated 

Annual 

Emissions

(tpy)

Unit

Description

09003 1509 PRATT & WHITNEY DIV UTC P0049 11 26 FT-8 COGENERATION GAS 

TURBINE

09011 0604 PFIZER INC P0001 33 79 BLR B&W FM140-97 #8

09011 0604 PFIZER INC R0012 31 74 BLR CE #5 (101-4)

09011 3102 SPRAGUE PAPERBOARD INC R0003 75 180 BLR B&W PFI-22-0 #1

24001 001-0011 WESTVACO FINE PAPERS 1 500 1200 001-0011-3-0018

24001 001-0011 WESTVACO FINE PAPERS 2 440 1056 001-0011-3-0019

25009 1190138 GENERAL ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT 03 29 68 BOILER #3-

BABCOCK+WILCOX PPL-2897 

DUAL FUEL EV99-3

25009 1190138 GENERAL ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT 05 24 58 TURBINE #1-GE G5301 DUAL 

FUEL BLDG 99-8

25017 1191844 MIT 02 132 317 TURBINE #1-ABB GT10 

DUEL FUEL(EXHAUST TO 

HRSG)

25025 1190507 TRIGEN BOSTON ENERGY 01 47 113 BOILER #1-

BABCOCK+WILCOX 

HSB8477A DUAL FUEL

25025 1190507 TRIGEN BOSTON ENERGY 02 47 113 BOILER #2-

BABCOCK+WILCOX 

JSB8477B DUAL FUEL

25025 1190507 TRIGEN BOSTON ENERGY 03 47 113 BOILER #3-

FOSTER+WHEELER SC DUAL 

FUEL

25025 1190507 TRIGEN BOSTON ENERGY 04 47 113 BOILER #4-

BABCOCK+WILCOX 

HSB8608A DUAL FUEL

36031 5154800008 INTERNATIONAL PAPER 

TICONDEROG

POWERH 227 545 EMISSION UNIT

36055 8261400205 KODAK PARK DIVISION U00015 1721 4130 EMISSION UNIT

36091 5412600007 INTERNATIONAL PAPER 

HUDSON RIV

UBOILR 124 298 EMISSION UNIT

42003 4200300022 SHENANGO INC. 005 13 31 BOILER #9, NATURAL GAS

42017 420170306 EXELON GENERATION 

CO/FAIRLESS

043 2 5 POWER HOUSE BOILER NO. 3
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-2

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITE ID Facility Name EU ID

Ozone 

Season

Allowance

(tpy)

Prorated 

Annual 

Emissions

(tpy)

Unit

Description

42017 420170306 EXELON GENERATION 

CO/FAIRLESS

044 73 175 POWER HOUSE BOILER NO. 4

42017 420170306 EXELON GENERATION 

CO/FAIRLESS

045 61 146 POWER HOUSE BOILER NO. 5

42045 420450016 KIMBERLY CLARK PA 

LLC/CHESTER

034 2 5 

42045 420450220 FPL ENERGY MH50 LP/MARCUS 

HOOK

031 82 197 COGENERATION UNIT - ABB 

TYPE B

42047 420470005 WEYERHAEUSER/JOHNSONBURG 

MILL

040 85 204 BOILER #81

42047 420470005 WEYERHAEUSER/JOHNSONBURG 

MILL

041 86 206 BOILER #82

42091 420910028 MERCK & CO/WEST POINT 039 101 242 COGEN II GAS TURBINE

42101 4210101551 SUNOCO CHEMICALS (FORMER 

ALLIE

052 86 206 BL-703: BOILER #3

42131 421310009 PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER 

PROD CO

035 203 482 WESTINGHOUSE 251B12

42133 421330016 PH GLATFELTER CO/SPRING 

GROVE

034 146 350 #4 POWER BOILER
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-3

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table B-2 Cement Kilns Affected by the NOx SIP Call Phase I

FIPS SITE ID Facility Name EU ID

Control 

Factor

Unit

Description

24013 013-0012 LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT 39 25.00 013-0012-6-0256 013-0012-6-0256

24021 021-0013 ESSROC CEMENT 21 25.00 021-0013-6-0465 021-0013-6-0465

24021 021-0013 ESSROC CEMENT 22 25.00 021-0013-6-0466 021-0013-6-0466

24043 043-0008 INDEPENDENT CEMENT/ST. 

LAWEREN

24 25.00 043-0008-6-0495 043-0008-6-0495

36001 4012400001 LAFARGE BUILDING MATERIALS INC 041000 25.00 EMISSION UNIT

36039 4192600021 ST LAWRENCE CEMENT CORPCATSKIU00K18 25.00 EMISSION UNIT

36113 5520500013 GLENS FALLS LEHIGH CEMENT 0UKILN 25.00 EMISSION UNIT

42011 420110039 LEHIGH CEMENT CO /EVANSVILLE 121 70.00 PORTLAND CEMENT KILN #1

42011 420110039 LEHIGH CEMENT CO /EVANSVILLE 122 70.00 PORTLAND CEMENT KILN #2

42019 420190024 ARMSTRONG CEMENT & SUPPLY 101 16.00 NO.1 KILN

42019 420190024 ARMSTRONG CEMENT & SUPPLY 121 16.00 NO.2 KILN

42073 420730024 CEMEX INC/WAMPUM CEMENT PLT 226 12.50 

42073 420730024 CEMEX INC/WAMPUM CEMENT PLT 227 0.00 

42073 420730024 CEMEX INC/WAMPUM CEMENT PLT 228 12.70 

42073 420730026 ESSROC/BESSEMER 501 8.00 

42073 420730026 ESSROC/BESSEMER 502 8.00 

42077 420770019 LAFARGE CORP/WHITEHALL PLT 101 12.28 K-2 KILN

42077 420770019 LAFARGE CORP/WHITEHALL PLT 114 100.00 K-3 KILN

42095 420950006 HERCULES CEMENT CO 

LP/STOCKERT

102 6.88 NO. 1 CEMENT KILN

42095 420950006 HERCULES CEMENT CO 

LP/STOCKERT

122 6.88 NO. 3 CEMENT KILN

42095 420950012 KEYSTONE PORTLAND 

CEMENT/EAST

101 27.00 CEMENT KILN NO. 1

42095 420950012 KEYSTONE PORTLAND 

CEMENT/EAST

102 27.00 CEMENT KILN NO. 2

42095 420950045 ESSROC/NAZARETH LOWER CEMENT 142 41.00 

42095 420950045 ESSROC/NAZARETH LOWER CEMENT 143 41.00 

42095 420950127 ESSROC/NAZARETH CEMENT PLT 3 101 41.00 

42095 420950127 ESSROC/NAZARETH CEMENT PLT 3 102 41.00 

42095 420950127 ESSROC/NAZARETH CEMENT PLT 3 103 41.00 

42095 420950127 ESSROC/NAZARETH CEMENT PLT 3 104 41.00 

42133 421330060 LEHIGH CEMENT CO/YORK 

OPERATION

200 27.00 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-4

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table B-3 Large IC Engines Affected by the NOx SIP Call Phase II

FIPS SITE ID Facility Name EU ID

Control 

Factor

Unit

Description

24027 027-0223 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE 1 80.00 027-0223-5-0054 boiler

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 101 80.00 ENGINE #1 (2000 BHP)

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 102 80.00 ENGINE #2 (2000 BHP)

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 103 80.00 ENGINE #3 (2000 BHP)

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 104 80.00 ENGINE #4 (2000 BHP)

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 105 80.00 ENGINE #5 (2000 BHP)

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 106 80.00 ENGINE #6 (2000 BHP)

42029 420290047 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS/FRAZER 

ST

741 80.00 #11 I-C GAS COMPRESSOR 

ENGINE

42029 420290047 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS/FRAZER 

ST

742 80.00 #12 I-C GAS COMPRESSOR 

ENGINE

42029 420290047 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS/FRAZER 

ST

743 80.00 #13 I-C GAS COMPRESSOR 

ENGINE

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 101 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #1

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 101 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #1

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 101 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #1

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 101 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #1

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 102 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #2

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 102 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #2

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 102 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #2

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 102 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #2

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 103 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #3

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 103 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #3

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 103 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #3

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 103 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #3

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 104 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #4

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 104 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #4

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 104 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #4

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 104 90.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #4

42105 421050005 TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO/313 P111 80.00 3,000HP KVT-512 ENGINE

42105 421050005 TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO/313 P112 80.00 2,000HP GMVH-10C ENGINE

42133 421330053 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS/STATION 1 036 80.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #4

42133 421330053 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS/STATION 1 037 80.00 COOPER-BESSEMER ENGINE #5
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-5

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

B-4 NonEGU Control Factors for Post-2002 MACT Categories

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

20100102 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100202 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100702 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100802 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100902 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200102 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200104 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200202 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200204 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200301 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200501 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200702 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200706 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200902 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201001 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201002 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201012 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201014 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201602 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201702 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20300101 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20300301 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

30400101 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400102 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400103 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400104 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400105 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400106 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400107 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400108 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400109 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400110 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400111 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400112 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400113 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400114 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400115 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400116 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400117 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400118 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400120 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400121 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400130 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400131 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400132 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400133 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400150 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400160 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400199 PM10-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30500301 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-6

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30500302 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500303 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500304 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500305 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500306 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500307 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500308 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500309 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500310 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500311 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500312 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500313 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500314 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500315 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500316 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500317 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500318 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500319 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500321 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500322 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500330 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500331 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500332 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500333 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500334 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500335 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500340 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500342 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500350 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500351 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500355 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500360 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500361 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500370 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500397 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500398 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500399 PM10-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30501601 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501602 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501603 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501604 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501605 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501606 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501607 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501608 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501609 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501610 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501611 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501612 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501613 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501614 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501615 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-7

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30501616 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501617 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501618 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501619 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501620 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501621 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501622 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501623 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501624 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501625 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501626 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501627 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501628 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501629 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501630 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501631 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501632 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501633 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501640 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501650 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501660 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501699 PM10-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30400101 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400102 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400103 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400104 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400105 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400106 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400107 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400108 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400109 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400110 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400111 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400112 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400113 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400114 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400115 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400116 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400117 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400118 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400120 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400121 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400130 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400131 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400132 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400133 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400150 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400160 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400199 PM25-PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30500301 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500302 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500303 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-8

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30500304 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500305 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500306 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500307 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500308 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500309 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500310 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500311 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500312 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500313 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500314 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500315 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500316 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500317 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500318 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500319 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500321 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500322 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500330 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500331 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500332 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500333 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500334 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500335 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500340 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500342 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500350 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500351 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500355 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500360 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500361 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500370 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500397 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500398 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500399 PM25-PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30501601 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501602 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501603 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501604 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501605 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501606 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501607 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501608 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501609 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501610 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501611 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501612 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501613 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501614 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501615 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501616 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501617 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-9

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30501618 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501619 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501620 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501621 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501622 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501623 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501624 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501625 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501626 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501627 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501628 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501629 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501630 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501631 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501632 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501633 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501640 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501650 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501660 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501699 PM25-PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

20100101 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20100102 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100201 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20100202 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100702 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100802 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100902 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200101 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20200102 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200103 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20200104 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200201 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20200202 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200203 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20200204 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200209 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20200301 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200501 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200702 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200706 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200902 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201001 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201002 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201012 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201014 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201602 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201702 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20300101 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20300102 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20300109 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20300202 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20300203 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-10

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

20300209 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20300301 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20300701 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

30100501 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100502 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100503 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100504 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100506 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100507 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100508 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100509 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100510 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100599 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30101005 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101013 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101014 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101023 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101026 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101027 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101028 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101033 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101034 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101035 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101036 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101037 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101045 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101046 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101047 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101050 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101051 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101052 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101053 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101054 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101055 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101061 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101062 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101063 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101064 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101073 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101074 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101075 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101076 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101077 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-11

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30101080 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101085 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101086 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101087 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101099 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101827 VOC 55.700 OOO Polymers and Resins III

30101837 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101880 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101881 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101882 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101883 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101884 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101885 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101890 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101891 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101892 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101893 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101894 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101899 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30103201 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103202 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103203 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103204 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103205 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103299 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103301 VOC 64.820 MMM Pesticide Active Ingredient

30103311 VOC 64.820 MMM Pesticide Active Ingredient

30103312 VOC 64.820 MMM Pesticide Active Ingredient

30103399 VOC 64.820 MMM Pesticide Active Ingredient

30103901 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

30103902 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

30103903 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

30105001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105101 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105105 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105108 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105110 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105112 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105114 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105116 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105118 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105120 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105122 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105124 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105130 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110003 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110004 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110005 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110080 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110099 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30111103 VOC 43.900 QQQQQ Friction Products Manufacturing
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-12

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30111199 VOC 43.900 QQQQQ Friction Products Manufacturing

30113001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30113003 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30113004 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30113005 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30113006 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30113007 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30201901 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201902 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201903 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201904 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201905 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201906 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201907 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201908 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201909 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201911 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201912 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201913 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201914 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201915 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201916 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201917 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201918 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201919 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201920 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201921 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201923 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201925 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201926 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201927 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201930 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201931 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201932 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201933 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201935 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201939 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201941 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201942 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201945 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201949 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201950 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201960 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201997 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201998 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201999 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30203404 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203405 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203406 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203407 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203410 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203415 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-13

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30203420 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203421 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203422 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203423 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203424 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203504 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203505 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203506 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203507 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203510 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203530 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203531 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203532 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203533 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203534 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203535 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203536 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203540 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30300303 VOC 50.000 CCCCC Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, Battery St

30300304 VOC 50.000 CCCCC Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, Battery St

30400301 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400302 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400303 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400304 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400305 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400310 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400314 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400315 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400316 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400317 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400318 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400319 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400320 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400321 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400322 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400325 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400330 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400331 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400332 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400333 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400340 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400341 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400342 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400350 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400351 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400352 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400353 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400354 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400355 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400356 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400357 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400358 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-14

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30400360 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400370 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400371 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400398 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400399 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30500101 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500102 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500103 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500104 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500105 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500106 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500107 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500108 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500110 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500111 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500112 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500113 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500114 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500115 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500116 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500117 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500118 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500119 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500120 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500121 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500130 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500131 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500132 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500133 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500134 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500135 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500140 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500141 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500142 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500143 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500144 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500145 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500146 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500147 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500150 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500151 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500152 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500153 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500154 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500198 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500199 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30501201 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501202 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501203 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501204 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501205 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501206 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-15

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30501207 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501208 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501209 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501211 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501212 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501213 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501214 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501215 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501221 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501222 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501223 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501224 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501299 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30600201 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries (FCC)

30600202 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries (FCC)

30600301 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries (FCC)

30600402 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries (FCC)

30600901 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600902 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600903 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600904 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600905 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600906 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600999 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30601001 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30601101 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30601201 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30601301 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30601401 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30609901 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30609902 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30609903 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30609904 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30609905 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30610001 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30688801 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30688802 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30688803 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30688804 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30688805 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30700103 VOC 7.020 MM Comustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, and Sulf

30700104 VOC 7.020 MM Comustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, and Sulf

30700106 VOC 7.020 MM Comustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, and Sulf

30700110 VOC 7.020 MM Comustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, and Sulf

30700602 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700604 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700606 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700607 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700608 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700610 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700611 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700621 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-16

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30700625 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700626 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700628 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700629 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700630 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700631 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700632 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700635 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700640 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700651 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700655 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700661 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700701 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700702 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700703 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700704 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700705 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700706 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700707 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700708 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700709 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700710 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700711 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700712 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700713 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700714 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700715 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700716 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700717 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700718 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700720 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700725 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700727 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700730 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700734 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700735 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700736 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700737 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700740 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700744 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700746 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700747 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700750 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700752 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700753 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700756 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700757 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700760 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700762 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700763 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700766 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700767 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-17

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30700769 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700770 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700771 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700780 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700781 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700783 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700785 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700788 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700789 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700790 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700791 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700792 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700793 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700798 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700799 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700921 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700923 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700925 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700927 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700931 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700932 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700933 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700934 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700935 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700936 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700937 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700939 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700940 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700950 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700960 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700971 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700980 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700981 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700982 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700983 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700984 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701001 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701008 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701009 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701010 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701015 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701020 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701030 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701040 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701053 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701054 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701055 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701057 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701199 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

30800101 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800102 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800103 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-18

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

30800104 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800105 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800106 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800107 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800108 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800109 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800110 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800111 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800112 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800113 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800114 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800115 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800116 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800117 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800120 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800121 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800122 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800123 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800124 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800125 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800126 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800127 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800128 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800129 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800130 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800131 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800132 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800133 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800197 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800198 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800199 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800701 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800702 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800703 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800704 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800705 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800720 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800721 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800722 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800723 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800724 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800799 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30801001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

31401001 VOC 43.900 QQQQQ Friction Products Manufacturing

31401002 VOC 43.900 QQQQQ Friction Products Manufacturing

31401501 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401503 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401504 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401510 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401511 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401512 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401513 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-19

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

31401514 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401515 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401516 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401517 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401518 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401525 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401530 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401531 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401540 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401541 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401550 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401551 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401552 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401553 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401560 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401561 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401562 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401563 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401570 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401571 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31604001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

31604002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

31604003 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

32099997 VOC 38.900 TTTT Leather Finishing Operations

32099998 VOC 38.900 TTTT Leather Finishing Operations

32099999 VOC 38.900 TTTT Leather Finishing Operations

40201101 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201103 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201104 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201105 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201111 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201112 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201113 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201114 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201115 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201116 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201121 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201122 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201197 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201198 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201199 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201201 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201210 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201301 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201303 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201304 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201305 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201310 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201320 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201330 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201399 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201601 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-20

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

40201602 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201603 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201604 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201605 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201606 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201607 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201608 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201609 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201619 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201620 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201621 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201622 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201623 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201624 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201625 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201626 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201627 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201628 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201629 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201630 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201631 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201632 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201699 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201702 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201703 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201704 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201705 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201706 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201721 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201722 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201723 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201724 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201725 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201726 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201727 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201728 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201729 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201731 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201732 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201733 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201734 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201735 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201736 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201737 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201738 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201739 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201799 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201801 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201802 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201803 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201804 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201805 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-21

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

40201806 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201807 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201899 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40202001 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202002 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202003 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202004 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202005 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202010 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202011 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202012 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202013 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202014 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202015 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202020 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202021 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202022 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202023 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202024 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202025 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202031 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202032 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202033 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202034 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202035 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202036 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202037 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202038 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202039 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202099 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202101 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202103 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202104 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202105 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202106 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202107 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202108 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202109 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202110 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202111 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202117 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202118 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202131 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202132 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202133 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202140 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202199 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202201 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202202 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202203 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202204 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202205 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-22

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

40202206 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202207 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202208 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202209 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202210 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202211 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202212 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202213 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202214 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202215 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202220 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202229 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202230 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202239 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202240 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202249 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202250 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202259 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202270 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202280 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202299 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202501 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202502 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202503 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202504 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202505 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202510 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202511 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202512 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202515 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202520 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202521 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202522 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202523 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202524 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202525 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202531 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202532 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202533 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202534 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202535 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202536 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202537 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202542 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202543 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202544 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202545 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202546 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202599 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202601 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202602 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202603 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-23

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

40202604 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202605 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202606 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202607 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202699 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40388801 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

40388802 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

40388803 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

40388804 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

40388805 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

40399999 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

50400101 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400102 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400103 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400104 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400150 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400151 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400201 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400202 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410001 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410002 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410003 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410004 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410005 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410010 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410020 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410021 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410022 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410030 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410040 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410101 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410110 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410111 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410112 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410120 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410121 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410122 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410123 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410124 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410210 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410211 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410212 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410213 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410214 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410215 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410216 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410310 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410311 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410312 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410313 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410314 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410321 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-24

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

50410322 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410405 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410406 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410407 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410408 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410409 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410420 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410510 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410511 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410512 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410513 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410514 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410520 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410521 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410522 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410523 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410524 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410525 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410530 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410531 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410532 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410533 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410534 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410535 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410536 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410537 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410538 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410539 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410540 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410541 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410542 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410543 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410560 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410561 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410562 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410563 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410564 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410565 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410610 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410620 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410621 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410622 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410623 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410640 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410641 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410642 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410643 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410644 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410645 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410710 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410711 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410712 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-25

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

50410720 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410721 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410722 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410723 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410724 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410725 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410726 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410740 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410760 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410761 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410762 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410763 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410764 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410765 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410766 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410780 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50480001 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50482001 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50482002 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50482599 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50490004 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

62540001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540022 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540023 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540024 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540025 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540040 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540041 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540042 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540050 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62580001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582002 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582501 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582502 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582503 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582599 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64130001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130101 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130110 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130111 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130112 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130125 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130201 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130210 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-26

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

64130211 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130225 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64180001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64182001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64182002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64182599 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64420001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420013 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420014 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420015 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420016 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420022 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420031 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420032 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420033 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420034 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420040 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420041 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420042 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430013 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430014 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430015 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430016 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-27

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

64430017 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431013 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431014 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431015 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431016 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431017 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450013 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450014 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450022 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450031 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450032 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450033 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450034 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450035 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450036 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450040 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450041 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450042 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450050 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450051 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450052 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450053 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450060 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450061 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450062 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64520001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520023 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520031 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520032 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520041 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-28

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

64521011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521023 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521041 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610031 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610032 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610041 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610050 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610101 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610110 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610111 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610112 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610120 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610121 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610122 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610130 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610131 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610132 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610140 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610141 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610142 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610143 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610150 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610201 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610210 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610211 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610212 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610220 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610221 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610222 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610230 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610231 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610232 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610240 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610241 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610242 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610250 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610301 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610310 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610311 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-29

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

64610312 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610320 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610321 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610322 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610330 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610331 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610332 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610340 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610350 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615023 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620013 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620016 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620017 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620018 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620026 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620027 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620031 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620032 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620033 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620034 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620035 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620036 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620037 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620038 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630016 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630026 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630035 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-30

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

64630041 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630042 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630050 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630051 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630052 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630053 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630080 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630081 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630082 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630083 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631016 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631026 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631050 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631051 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631052 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631053 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631080 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631081 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631082 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631083 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632016 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632041 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632042 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632050 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632051 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632052 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632053 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632080 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632081 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632082 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632083 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64680001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64682001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64682002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64682501 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64682502 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64682599 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-31

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

64820010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64821001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64821010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64822001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64822010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64823001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64823010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64824001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64824010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64880001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64882001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64882002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64882599 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64920001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920013 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920022 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920031 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920032 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920033 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920034 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930031 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930035 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930040 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930041 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930045 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930050 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931022 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931031 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931032 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931040 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931041 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931050 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-32

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART MACT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION

64980001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64982001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64982002 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64982599 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

65135001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

65140001 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140010 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140011 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140012 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140013 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140014 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140015 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140016 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140017 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140018 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140030 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

68430001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68430010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68430011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68430020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68430030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68430031 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68430032 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445013 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445101 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445201 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68510001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68510010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68510011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68580001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68582001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68582002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68582599 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-33

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table B-5 NonEGU Source Shutdowns

FIPS SITE ID FACILTY NAME EU ID UNIT DESCRIPTION

10003 1000300021 SUNCO INC R M 001 BOILER #1

10003 1000300021 SUNCO INC R M 002 BOILER #2

10003 1000300021 SUNCO INC R M 003 BOILER #3

10003 1000300016 MOTIVA ENTERPRISES LLC 072 METHANOL PLT HTR 41-H-1

10003 1000300004 WILMINGTON PIECE DYE CO ALL ALL

10003 1000300032 GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION ALL ALL

10003 1000300074 METACHEM PRODUCTS LLC ALL ALL

10003 1000300127 VPI FILM LLC ALL ALL

10003 1000300129 LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC ALL ALL

10003 1000300350 KANEKA DELAWARE CORPORATION ALL ALL

25001 1200202 PARTYLITE WORLDWIDE ALL ALL

25001 1200614 BOURNE LANDFILL ALL ALL

25003 1170002 ADVANCED INFORMATION ALL ALL

25003 1170005 CATAMOUNT PELLET FUE ALL ALL

25003 1170048 SPRAGUE NORTH ADAMS ALL ALL

25003 1170056 BERKSHIRE GAS STOCKB ALL ALL

25003 1170078 MACDERMID GRAPHIC AR ALL ALL

25003 1170091 LANE CONSTRUCTION CO ALL ALL

25005 1200009 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS ALL ALL

25005 1200031 CONDEA VISTA CO ALL ALL

25005 1200036 ELKAY REVERE CORP ALL ALL

25005 1200037 AEROVOX INCORPORATED ALL ALL

25005 1200065 ROSEMAR SILVER COMPA ALL ALL

25005 1200080 ATTLEBORO REFINING C ALL ALL

25005 1200116 STEDRO TEXTILES ALL ALL

25005 1200138 CLIFTEX CORPORATION ALL ALL

25005 1200169 PAUL DEVER STATE SCH ALL ALL

25005 1200209 PHARMACY SERVICE COR ALL ALL

25005 1200216 BRISTOL COUNTY JAIL ALL ALL

25005 1200235 SEA WATCH INTERNATIO ALL ALL

25005 1200393 OLSONS GREENHOUSES ALL ALL

25005 1200468 AA WILL MATERIALS-FR ALL ALL

25005 1200498 CRAPO HILL LANDFILL ALL ALL

25005 1200510 KREW INCORPORATED ALL ALL

25005 1200513 AEROVOX INCORPORATED ALL ALL

25005 1200542 LALLY COLUMN CORP ALL ALL

25005 1200673 HOMELAND BUILDERS ALL ALL

25005 1200824 JUSTIN CLOTHING CO ALL ALL

25005 1200880 VELVET DRIVE TRANSMI ALL ALL
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-34

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITE ID FACILTY NAME EU ID UNIT DESCRIPTION

25005 1192308 INTERSTATE MAT & RUB ALL ALL

25009 1210057 COASTAL METAL FINISH ALL ALL

25009 1210058 AMESBURY CHAIR ALL ALL

25009 1210075 HAMPSHIRE FABRICS ALL ALL

25009 1210099 WASTE MANAGEMENT HUN ALL ALL

25009 1210110 CUSTOM INDUSTRIES IN ALL ALL

25009 1210114 SAGAMORE INDUSTRIAL ALL ALL

25009 1210143 LABELS INC ALL ALL

25009 1210154 NEWARK ATLANTIC PAPE ALL ALL

25009 1210208 TEK COATING COMPANY ALL ALL

25009 1210209 NATIONAL NORTHEAST ALL ALL

25009 1210223 STARENSIER INC ALL ALL

25009 1210400 SANMINA CORPORATION ALL ALL

25009 1210401 COVANTA HAVERHILL IN ALL ALL

25009 1210404 TEKE FURNITURE RESTO ALL ALL

25009 1190756 PERMAIR LEATHERS INC ALL ALL

25009 1190842 SLB SNACKS INC ALL ALL

25009 1190983 SALEM OIL & GREASE C ALL ALL

25009 1191036 JCR ELECTRONICS ALL ALL

25009 1195900 LEPAGES INC ALL ALL

25013 0420008 DELUXE FINANCIAL ALL ALL

25013 0420010 FRYE COPYSYSTEMS INC ALL ALL

25013 0420013 JAHN FOUNDRY CORPORA ALL ALL

25013 0420052 APW/WRIGHT LINE ALL ALL

25013 0420130 KODAK POLYCHROME GRA ALL ALL

25013 0420175 FIBERMARK DSI ALL ALL

25013 0420218 SPRINGFIELD PRINTING ALL ALL

25013 0420252 KODAK POLYCHROME GRA ALL ALL

25013 0420528 NATIONAL METAL INDUS ALL ALL

25015 0420060 BERKSHIRE GAS HATFIE ALL ALL

25015 0420105 INDUSTRIAL POWER SER ALL ALL

25015 0420170 TECHALLOY COMPANY IN ALL ALL

25015 0420424 MAGNAT MACHINETECH I ALL ALL

25015 0420463 INDUSTRIAL PROP OF E ALL ALL

25015 0420540 GENERAL CABLE CORP ALL ALL

25015 0420614 REXAM IMAGE PRODUCTS ALL ALL

25017 1210013 MERRIMACK MAGNETICS ALL ALL

25017 1210050 MAJILITE MFG INC ALL ALL

25017 1210064 FINISH UNLIMITED INC ALL ALL

25017 1190080 MASS BROKEN STONE CO ALL ALL

25017 1210127 USM CORPORATION ALL ALL
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-35

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITE ID FACILTY NAME EU ID UNIT DESCRIPTION

25017 1210147 UMASS LOWELL-RESIDEN ALL ALL

25017 1210182 JOAN FABRICS CORP ALL ALL

25017 1190203 SC WAKEFIELD 200 ALL ALL

25017 1190212 OLYMPUS SPECIALTY HO ALL ALL

25017 1190258 ROYAL INSTITUTIONAL ALL ALL

25017 1210334 T&T INDUSTRIAL ALL ALL

25017 1190465 PRINTED CIRCUIT CORP ALL ALL

25017 1190611 GEORGE MEADE FOUNDRY ALL ALL

25017 1190734 NEW ENGLAND CONFECTI ALL ALL

25017 1180794 SCHOTT CML FIBEROPTI ALL ALL

25017 1190984 SUNGARD AVAILABILITY ALL ALL

25017 1191008 RAYTHEON SYSTEMS CO ALL ALL

25017 1191217 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CO ALL ALL

25017 1191267 AGFA DIVISION OF BAY ALL ALL

25017 1191351 MIT EDUCATIONAL FACI ALL ALL

25017 1191389 LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPA ALL ALL

25017 1191534 SWISSTRONICS INCORPO ALL ALL

25017 1191653 FOCAL INCORPORATED ALL ALL

25017 1191668 LEE PRODUCTS COMPANY ALL ALL

25017 1191735 TYCO ELECTRONICS COR ALL ALL

25017 1191897 GENZYME CORPORATION ALL ALL

25017 1194001 WF WOOD INC ALL ALL

25017 1194010 RR DONNELLEY & SONS ALL ALL

25017 1214012 PERFORMANCE CORRUGAT ALL ALL

25021 1190246 SOUTHWOOD COMMUNITY ALL ALL

25021 1190313 INNOVATIVE MEMBRANE ALL ALL

25021 1180359 BEVILACQUA PAVING CO ALL ALL

25021 1200515 FOXBOROUGH REALTY AS ALL ALL

25021 1200616 PLAINVILLE GENERATIN ALL ALL

25021 1190670 RAYTHEON ELECTRONIC ALL ALL

25021 1190714 TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL ALL ALL

25021 1190962 NIDEC AMERICA CORPOR ALL ALL

25021 1191562 BARCLAY HOUSE THE ALL ALL

25021 1191726 MWRA QUINCY PS ALL ALL

25021 1192130 CURRY WOODWORKING IN ALL ALL

25021 1199000 MEDFIELD STATE HOSPI ALL ALL

25023 1200637 FRANKLIN FIXTURES IN ALL ALL

25023 1200698 CRANBERRY GRAPHICS I ALL ALL

25023 1192101 GTR FINISHING CORPOR ALL ALL

25023 1192109 ALGER CORPORATION TH ALL ALL

25023 1192210 IMPERIA CORPORATION ALL ALL
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix B – Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B-36

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITE ID FACILTY NAME EU ID UNIT DESCRIPTION

25023 1199994 TEST-RADIUS-FITZGERA ALL ALL

25025 1190035 BOSTON WATER & SEWER ALL ALL

25025 1190057 NEPONSET RIVER VALLE ALL ALL

25025 1190101 UNIFIRST CORP ALL ALL

25025 1190357 DAMRELL EWER PARTNER ALL ALL

25025 1190478 WINTHROP COMMUNITY H ALL ALL

25025 1190649 ZAPCO READVILLE COGE ALL ALL

25025 1190808 PUBLIC HEALTH COMMUN ALL ALL

25025 1191551 BEACON CAPITAL PARTN ALL ALL

25025 1191566 NEW ENGLAND TRAWLER ALL ALL

25025 1191621 FEDERAL MOGUL FRICTI ALL ALL

25025 1191662 EQUITY OFFICE ALL ALL

25025 1191956 CHANNEL CENTER:PARCE ALL ALL

25025 1195596 SYNTHON IND INCORPOR ALL ALL

25027 1180010 CANTERBURY TOWERS ALL ALL

25027 1180014 ER BUCK CHAIR COMPAN ALL ALL

25027 1180029 GENERAL ELECTRIC FIT ALL ALL

25027 1180091 ANGLO FABRICS COMPAN ALL ALL

25027 1180100 ZAPCO ENERGY TACTICS ALL ALL

25027 1180111 CINCINATTI MILACRON ALL ALL

25027 1180114 NEW ENGLAND PLATING ALL ALL

25027 1180129 GF WRIGHT STEEL & WI ALL ALL

25027 1180132 STANDARDFOUNDRY ALL ALL

25027 1180174 WORCESTER TOOL & STA ALL ALL

25027 1180203 WORCESTER COUNTY HOS ALL ALL

25027 1180244 HI TECH METALS & FIN ALL ALL

25027 1180340 GHM INDUSTRIES INC ALL ALL

25027 1180353 ADVANCED MICROSENSOR ALL ALL

25027 1180355 NEWARK AMERICA ALL ALL

25027 1180373 ZYGO TERAOPTIX ALL ALL

25027 1180389 ETHAN ALLEN-DUDLEY ALL ALL

25027 1180439 INLAND PAPERBOARD & ALL ALL

25027 1180484 NELMOR COMPANY ALL ALL

25027 1180518 JAMESBURY INCORPORAT ALL ALL

25027 1180556 M&H TIRE CO INC ALL ALL

25027 1180568 CROFT CORPORATION ALL ALL

25027 1180796 LINCOLN PLAZA CENTER ALL ALL

25027 1180994 COZ PLASTICS INC ALL ALL

25027 1181045 WORCESTER TAPER PIN ALL ALL

33011 3301100093 BATESVILLE MANUFACTURING ALL ALL

33015 3301500058 VENTURE SEABROOK ALL ALL
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix C – Area Source Growth Factors Page C-1

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Appendix C – Area Source Growth Factors

Table C-1 Area Source Growth Factors by SCC Code

See Electronic File: MANE-VU_Area_gf_scc.xls

This table contains records with area source growth factors by county and SCC. The format for the 

tables is as follows: 

Column A – County FIPS code

Column B – Source Classification Code (SCC)

Column C – EGAS_02_09 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column D – AEO5_02_09 this is the DOE AEO 2005 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column E – ST_02_09 this is the state-supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column F – GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2009 (it 

is the state-supplied factor, if available; if no state-supplied factor, then it is the AEO2005 

factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column G – EGAS_02_12 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column H – AEO5_02_12 this is the DOE AEO 2005 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column I – ST_02_12 this is the state-supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column J – GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2012 (it 

is the state-supplied factor, if available; if no state-supplied factor, then it is the AEO2005 

factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column K – EGAS_02_18 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018

Column J – AEO5_02_18 this is the DOE AEO 2005 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018

Column M– ST_02_18 this is the state-supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018 

Column N – GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2012 (it 

is the state-supplied factor, if available; if no state-supplied factor, then it is the AEO2005 

factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column O – SCC description
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-1

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Appendix D – Area Source Control Factors

Table D-1 Area Source Control Factors for 2001 OTC VOC Model Rules

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

AIM Coatings

09 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural 

Coatings;Surface Coating

09 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

10 2401002000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings 

- Solvent-based;Surface Coating

10 2401003000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings 

- Water-based;Surface Coating

10 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

10 2401102000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings- Solve;Surface Coating

10 2401103000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings- Water;Surface Coating

11 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural 

Coatings;Surface Coating

11 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

11 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

11 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose 

Coatings;Surface Coating

23 2401001000 VOC 29.50 29.50 29.50 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural 

Coatings;Surface Coating

23 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

23 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

23 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose 

Coatings;Surface Coating

24 2401002000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings 

- Solvent-based;Surface Coating

24 2401003000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings 

- Water-based;Surface Coating

24 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

24 2401008999 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Solvents: NEC;Traffic Markings;Surface 

Coating

24 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

24 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose 

Coatings;Surface Coating

25 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural 

Coatings;Surface Coating

25 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

25 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-2

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

25 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose 

Coatings;Surface Coating

33 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural 

Coatings;Surface Coating

33 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

33 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

33 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose 

Coatings;Surface Coating

34 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural 

Coatings;Surface Coating

34 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

34 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

34 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose 

Coatings;Surface Coating

36 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural 

Coatings;Surface Coating

36 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

42 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural 

Coatings;Surface Coating

42 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

42 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

42 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose 

Coatings;Surface Coating

44 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural 

Coatings;Surface Coating

44 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

50 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural 

Coatings;Surface Coating

50 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic 

Markings;Surface Coating

50 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial 

Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

50 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose 

Coatings;Surface Coating

Consumer Products

09 2465000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All 

Products/Processes;Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Consumer

10 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Personal Care 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

10 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-3

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

10 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Automotive 

Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Consumer and Commerc

10 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and 

Related Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

10 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and 

Sealants;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

10 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

10 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous 

Products (Not Otherwise 

Covered);Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

11 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Personal Care 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

11 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

11 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Automotive 

Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Consumer and Commerc

11 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and 

Related Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

11 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and 

Sealants;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

11 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

11 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous 

Products (Not Otherwise 

Covered);Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

23 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Personal Care 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

23 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

23 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Automotive 

Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Consumer and Commerc

23 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and 

Related Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

23 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and 

Sealants;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-4

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

23 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

23 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous 

Products (Not Otherwise 

Covered);Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

24 2465000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All 

Products/Processes;Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Consumer

25 2460000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All 

Processes;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

33 2460000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All

Processes;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

34 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Personal Care 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

34 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

34 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Automotive 

Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Consumer and Commerc

34 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and 

Related Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

34 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and 

Sealants;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

34 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

34 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous 

Products (Not Otherwise 

Covered);Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

34 2465000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All 

Products/Processes;Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Consumer

36 2460000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All 

Processes;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

42 2465000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All 

Products/Processes;Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Consumer

44 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Personal Care 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

44 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

44 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Automotive 

Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Consumer and Commerc
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-5

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

44 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and 

Related Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

44 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and 

Sealants;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

44 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

44 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous 

Products (Not Otherwise 

Covered);Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

50 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Personal Care 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

50 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

50 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Automotive 

Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Consumer and Commerc

50 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and 

Related Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

50 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and 

Sealants;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

50 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related 

Products;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

50 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous 

Products (Not Otherwise 

Covered);Miscellaneous Non-industrial: 

Consumer and Commerc

Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing

09 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

10 2401005500 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Surface Preparation Solvents;Auto Refinishing: 

SIC 7532;Surface Coating

10 2401005600 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Primers;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface 

Coating

10 2401005700 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Top Coats;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface 

Coating

10 2401005800 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Clean-up Solvents;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

11 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

23 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

24 2401005000 VOC 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-6

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

25 2401005000 VOC 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

33 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

34 2401005000 VOC 19.00 19.00 19.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

36 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

42 2401005000 VOC 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

44 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

50 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 

7532;Surface Coating

Solvent Cleaning Operations

09 2415000000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Processes/All 

Industries;Degreasing

23 2415000000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Processes/All 

Industries;Degreasing

23 2415030000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Electronic and Other 

Elec. (SIC 36): All Processes;Degreasing

23 2415045000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous 

Manufacturing (SIC 39): All 

Processe;Degreasing

23 2415065000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Repair Services 

(SIC 75): All Processes;Degreasing

23 2415300000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Industries: Cold 

Cleaning;Degreasing

25 2415000000 VOC 7.00 7.00 7.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Industries: Cold 

Cleaning;Degreasing

33 2415000000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Industries: Cold 

Cleaning;Degreasing

34 2415000000 VOC 17.00 17.00 17.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Processes/All 

Industries;Degreasing

36 2415020000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Fabricated Metal 

Products (SIC 34): All Processes;Degreasing

36 2415025000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial Machinery 

and Equipment (SIC 35): All P;Degreasing

36 2415035000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Transportation 

Equipment (SIC 37): All Processes;Degreasing

36 2415045000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous 

Manufacturing (SIC 39): All 

Processe;Degreasing

36 2415055000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Automotive Dealers 

(SIC 55): All Processes;Degreasing

36 2415060000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous Repair 

Services (SIC 76): All Proces;Degreasing

44 2415000000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Processes/All 

Industries;Degreasing
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-7

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

Portable Fuel Containers

09 2501060300 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential & 

Com;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

10 2501011010 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Vapor Losses;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

10 2501011011 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

10 2501011012 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

10 2501011015 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Spillage;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

10 2501011016 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

10 2501012010 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Vapor Losses;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

10 2501012011 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

10 2501012012 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

10 2501012015 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Spillage;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

10 2501012016 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

11 2501011011 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

11 2501011012 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

11 2501011016 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

11 2501012011 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

11 2501012012 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-8

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

Storage

11 2501012016 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

23 2501060300 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential & 

Com;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

24 2501011011 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

24 2501011012 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

24 2501011016 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

24 2501012011 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

24 2501012012 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

24 2501012016 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

25 2501011000 VOC 18.8 41.3 75.0 ;;

25 2501012000 VOC 18.8 41.3 75.0 ;;

33 2501060300 VOC 26.3 48.8 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential & 

Com;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

34 2501000120 VOC 33.8 56.3 75.0 Gasoline;All Storage Types: Breathing 

Loss;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

36 2501011011 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

36 2501011012 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

36 2501011016 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers: 

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

36 2501012011 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

36 2501012012 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-9

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

36 2501012016 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers: 

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product 

Storage

42 2501060300 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential & 

Com;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

44 2501060300 VOC 18.8 41.3 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential & 

Com;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

50 2501060300 VOC 18.8 41.3 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential & 

Com;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-10

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table D-2 Area Source Control Factors for On-Board Vapor Recovery

FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

09001 2501060101 VOC 23.81 28.57 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09001 2501060102 VOC 23.81 28.57 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09003 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09003 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09005 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09005 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09007 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09007 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09009 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09009 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09011 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09011 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09013 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09013 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09015 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

09015 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

10001 2501060100 VOC 40.54 48.65 56.76 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

10003 2501060100 VOC 40.54 48.65 56.76 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

10005 2501060100 VOC 40.54 48.65 56.76 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

11001 2501060100 VOC 40.54 48.65 56.76 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23001 2501060100 VOC 53.68 67.65 79.41 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23003 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23005 2501060100 VOC 28.57 33.33 42.86 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23007 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23009 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23011 2501060100 VOC 53.68 67.65 79.41 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23013 2501060100 VOC 53.68 67.65 79.41 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23015 2501060100 VOC 53.68 67.65 79.41 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23017 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23019 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23021 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23023 2501060100 VOC 28.57 33.33 42.86 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23025 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23027 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23029 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23031 2501060100 VOC 28.57 33.33 42.86 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24001 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-11

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

24003 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24005 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24009 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24011 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24013 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24015 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24017 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24019 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24021 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24023 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24025 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24027 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24029 2501060100 VOC 53.53 68.24 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24031 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24033 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24035 2501060100 VOC 53.53 68.24 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24037 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24039 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24041 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24043 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24045 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24047 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24510 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

25001 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25003 2501060102 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25005 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25007 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25009 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25011 2501060102 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25013 2501060102 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25015 2501060102 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25017 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25019 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25021 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25023 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25025 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

25027 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

33001 2501060100 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33003 2501060100 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33005 2501060100 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33007 2501060100 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-12

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

33009 2501060100 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33011 2501060100 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33013 2501060100 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33015 2501060100 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33017 2501060100 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33019 2501060100 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34001 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34003 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34005 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34007 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34009 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34011 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34013 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34015 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34017 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34019 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34021 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34023 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34025 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34027 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34029 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34031 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34033 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34035 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34037 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34039 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34041 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36001 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36003 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36005 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36007 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36009 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36011 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36013 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36015 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36017 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36019 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36021 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36023 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36025 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36027 2501060100 VOC 53.80 67.72 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36029 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36031 2501060100 VOC 53.57 67.86 79.76 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36033 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36035 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36037 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36039 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36041 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36043 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36045 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-13

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

36047 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36049 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36051 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36053 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36055 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36057 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36059 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36061 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36063 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36065 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36067 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36069 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36071 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36073 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36075 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36077 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36079 2501060100 VOC 53.80 67.72 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36081 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36083 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36085 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36087 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36089 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36091 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36093 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36095 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36097 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36099 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36101 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36103 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36105 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36107 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36109 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36111 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36113 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36115 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36117 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36119 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36121 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36123 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

42001 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42003 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42005 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 39.13 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42007 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42009 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42011 2501060101 VOC 26.09 34.78 39.13 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42013 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-14

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

Stations

42015 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42017 2501060102 VOC 30.43 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42019 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42021 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42023 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42025 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42027 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42029 2501060102 VOC 30.43 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42031 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42033 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42035 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42037 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42039 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42041 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42043 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42045 2501060102 VOC 30.43 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42047 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42049 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42051 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42053 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42055 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42057 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42059 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42061 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42063 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42065 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42067 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42069 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42071 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42073 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-15

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

Stations

42075 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42077 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42079 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42081 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42083 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42085 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42087 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42089 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42091 2501060102 VOC 30.43 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42093 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42095 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42097 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42099 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42101 2501060102 VOC 30.43 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42103 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42105 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42107 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service

Stations

42109 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42111 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42113 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42115 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42117 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42119 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42121 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42123 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42125 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42127 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42129 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42131 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

42133 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-16

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

Stations

44001 2501060000 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Total: All Gasoline/All Processes;Gasoline Service Stations

44003 2501060000 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Total: All Gasoline/All Processes;Gasoline Service Stations

44005 2501060000 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Total: All Gasoline/All Processes;Gasoline Service Stations

44007 2501060000 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Total: All Gasoline/All Processes;Gasoline Service Stations

44009 2501060000 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Total: All Gasoline/All Processes;Gasoline Service Stations

50001 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50001 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50001 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50003 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50003 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50003 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50005 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50005 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50005 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50007 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50007 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50007 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50009 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50009 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50009 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50011 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50011 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50011 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50013 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50013 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50013 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50015 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50015 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50015 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50017 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50017 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50017 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50019 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50019 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50019 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50021 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-17

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018 SCC Description

Stations

50021 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50021 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50023 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50023 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50023 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50025 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50025 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50025 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50027 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50027 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service 

Stations

50027 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix D –Area Source Control Factors Page D-18

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table D-3 Area Source Growth/Control Factors for Residential Wood Combustion

Growth and Control Factor

SCC SCC Description Assumptions

2002-

2009

2002-

2012

2002-

2018

2104008000 Total: Woodstoves and Fireplaces 1 - 0.01056*(Year-2002)

(Assumes 19.4% fireplaces 

71.6%old woodstoves

9.1%new woodstoves)

0.926 0.894 0.831

2104008001 Fireplaces: General Increase 1%/yr: 1 + 0.01*(Year-2002) 1.070 1.100 1.160

2104008002 Fireplaces: Insert; non-EPA 

certified

Decrease 2%/yr: 1 - 0.02*(Year-2002) 0.860 0.800 0.680

2104008003 Fireplaces: Insert; EPA certified; 

non-catalytic

Increase 2%/yr: 1 + 0.02*(Year-2002) 1.140 1.200 1.320

2104008004 Fireplaces: Insert; EPA certified; 

catalytic

Increase 2%/yr (same as 2104008003) 1.140 1.200 1.320

2104008010 Woodstoves: General Decrease 2%/yr (same as 2104008002) 0.860 0.800 0.680

2104008030 Catalytic Woodstoves: General Increase 2%/yr (same as 2104008003) 1.140 1.200 1.320

2104008050 Non-catalytic Woodstoves: EPA 

certified

Increase 2%/yr (same as 2104008003) 1.140 1.200 1.320

2104008051 Non-catalytic Woodstoves: NonEPA certifiedDecrease 2%/yr (same as 2104008002) 0.860 0.800 0.680

2104008052 Non-catalytic Woodstoves: Low 

Emitting

Increase 2%/yr (same as 2104008003) 1.140 1.200 1.320

2104008053 Non-catalytic Woodstoves: Pellet 

Fired

Increase 2%/yr (same as 2104008003) 1.140 1.200 1.320
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-1

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table E-1 NonEGU BOTW Control Factors for Adhesives and Sealants Application, 

Asphalt Production Plants, Cement Kilns, and Glass/Fiberglass Furnaces

FIPS SITEID EU ID

PROCESS 

ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

Control Measure: Adhesives and Sealants Application

09003 6484 R0131 01 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

09003 6484 R0132 01 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

09015 0647 P0085 01 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10001 1000100004 003 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10001 1000100004 005 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10001 1000100004 005 3 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10001 1000100004 005 4 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10001 1000100004 005 5 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10003 1000300365 002 2 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10003 1000300365 002 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

23001 2300100076 003 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24003 003-0250 232 01F232 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24003 003-0250 232 01S232 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24005 005-2407 17 01F17 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24005 005-2407 17 01S17 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025-0006 45 01F45 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025-0006 45 01S45 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025-0423 5 01F5 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025-0423 5 01S5 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025-0423 6 01F6 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025-0423 6 01S6 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025-0423 7 01F7 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025-0423 7 01S7 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24045 045-0082 12 01F12 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24045 045-0082 12 01S12 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200077 12 0108 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200100 23 0111 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200100 26 0114 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200100 28 0116 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200101 08 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200101 09 0108 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200101 10 0109 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200101 11 0110 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200101 12 0111 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200183 07 0203 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200388 04 0104 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200388 05 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200388 05 0205 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200509 04 0104 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200585 02 0102 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200673 07 0107 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-2

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITEID EU ID

PROCESS 

ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

25005 1200707 08 0106 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200851 11 0110 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1190683 03 0103 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1190690 09 0108 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210026 15 0115 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210046 01 0101 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210083 05 0104 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210093 09 0209 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210110 01 0101 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210212 30 0321 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210212 30 0721 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210212 32 0322 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210212 32 0622 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210212 32 0922 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210276 03 0102 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210332 01 0101 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210332 02 0102 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210332 03 0103 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210341 10 0110 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1211013 07 0105 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1211013 08 0306 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1211013 33 0331 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1211013 72 0259 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1211013 89 0253 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420145 16 0112 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420213 01 0201 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420260 02 0102 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420265 06 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420561 01 0101 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420798 05 0105 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420821 10 0106 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25015 0420558 01 0101 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 02 0102 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 03 0103 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 04 0104 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 05 0105 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 06 0106 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 07 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 08 0108 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 09 0109 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190355 05 0101 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 04 0104 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 08 0106 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 11 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 20 0110 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 24 0111 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 28 0112 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-3

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITEID EU ID

PROCESS 

ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

25017 1190424 32 0213 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 37 0117 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190429 06 0106 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190560 02 0101 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190560 23 0106 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190585 08 0104 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190585 17 0106 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190692 09 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190692 10 0108 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190692 11 0108 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190953 04 0104 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190999 11 0111 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190999 11 0211 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190999 13 0313 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191104 03 0103 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191192 05 0104 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191296 26 0116 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191296 27 0117 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191471 04 0103 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191564 08 0108 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191844 53 0135 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191844 53 0335 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1192051 12 0107 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1192051 26 0115 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210036 03 0103 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210036 05 0104 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210036 07 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 01 0101 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 02 0102 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 03 0103 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 04 0104 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 04 0204 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 05 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 05 0205 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 06 0106 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 06 0206 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 09 0109 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 10 0110 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210912 02 0202 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1190319 04 0103 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1190319 11 0111 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1190569 23 0215 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1192106 03 0103 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1192121 07 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1192131 03 0103 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1192491 07 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1192491 08 0108 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-4

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITEID EU ID

PROCESS 

ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

25021 1200125 55 0146 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1200125 56 0147 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1200127 10 0209 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1200228 04 0203 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1200452 04 0102 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 11 0107 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 12 0108 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 19 0109 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 23 0109 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 25 0109 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 26 0109 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192203 01 0101 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192237 08 0102 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192436 09 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1200177 05 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1200637 04 0104 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1200637 07 0105 40200707 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25025 1191397 05 0106 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25025 1191397 06 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180025 01 0301 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180115 17 0209 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180115 25 0311 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180115 36 0117 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180115 39 0118 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180115 77 0251 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180225 04 0104 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180265 05 0205 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180310 03 0203 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180310 03 0303 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180505 07 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180505 23 0123 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180998 27 0111 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180998 30 0113 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1200856 12 0110 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1200856 13 0111 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33011 3301100076 004 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33011 3301100076 005 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33011 3301100076 009 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33017 3301700010 001 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33017 3301700010 002 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36063 9290900018 ADHES1 HM1FP 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36069 8329900028 000005 WABFP 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36103 1473000001 EI0001 E10EI 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36103 1473000001 U00002 103FP 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36115 5533000016 U00011 SL2FP 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36117 8543600007 1MLDRB SC3FP 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36117 8543600007 2KLZRS SC2FP 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-5

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITEID EU ID

PROCESS 

ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

42001 420010009 103 1 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42013 420130480 101 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42017 420171041 101 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190029 104 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190029 105 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 3 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 4 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 5 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 6 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42035 420350429 P105 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42035 420350429 P106 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42039 420390013 106 1 40200707 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42039 420390014 102 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42039 420390014 103 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42039 420390014 104 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42039 420390014 105 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42045 420450954 121 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42055 420550022 100 1 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42055 420550022 101 1 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610016 104 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610016 105 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 101 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 101 4 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 101 6 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 102 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 102 4 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 102 6 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 103 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 103 4 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42069 420690023 107 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42069 420690023 108 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42071 420710802 102 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42071 420710804 102 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 101 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 101 2 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 102 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 102 2 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 103 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 104 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 105 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42081 420810039 113 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42081 420810559 P104 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42091 420910826 002 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42097 420970001 105 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42097 420970001 201 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-6

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITEID EU ID

PROCESS 

ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

42097 420970001 202 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42097 420970034 104 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42097 420970034 105A 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210101591 004 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 005 10 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 005 11 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 005 12 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 006 5 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 007 6 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 008 14 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 009 7 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210103217 010 2 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42109 421090001 113 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42109 421090001 140 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42119 421190477 P101 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42129 421290071 105 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42129 421290311 101 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42133 421330034 103 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42133 421330055 101 1 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42133 421330055 101 2 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44003 AIR1438 8 8 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44007 AIR1859 2 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44007 AIR3850 1 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44007 AIR537 2 2 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44009 AIR594 7 7 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

50005 9 4 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

Control Measure: Asphalt Production Plants

34001 70003 U101 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70003 U101 OS2 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70003 U12 OS0 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70003 U13 OS0 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70003 U6 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70015 U401 OS1601 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70015 U401 OS2101 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70015 U401 OS401 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34007 50373 U11 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34007 50373 U6 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34009 73014 U9 OS3 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34009 73014 U9 OS7 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34013 05005 U2 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34015 55261 U4 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34017 11171 U2 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34021 60031 U6 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34023 15129 U7 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34025 20022 U1 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34025 20023 U2 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34025 20025 U26 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-7

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITEID EU ID

PROCESS 

ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

34025 20025 U3 OS2 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34027 25009 U13 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34027 25009 U2 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34027 25268 U100 OS101 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34027 25268 U1601 OS1601 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34027 25268 U1601 OS1602 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78010 U1500 OS1501 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78010 U1500 OS1502 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78010 U1601 OS1601 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78010 U900 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78012 U101 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78014 U2 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30005 U100 OS113 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30005 U2300 OS2301 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30005 U2300 OS2332 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30085 U100 OS201 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30085 U100 OS901 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30085 U100 OS903 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 35014 U100 OS113 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 35014 U100 OS2301 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 36009 U1000 OS1201 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 36009 U1000 OS1202 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 36009 U1000 OS1301 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 36009 U1000 OS1401 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34037 83008 U4 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

36081 2630200138 D00001 P01FP 30500251 NOX 35.00 35.00 35.00

36085 2640300031 3ADRYR 302FP 30500251 NOX 35.00 35.00 35.00

36119 3550800247 1MIXER 001FP 30500205 NOX 35.00 35.00 35.00

Control Measure: Cement Kilns

23013 2301300028 001 1 30500706 NOX 60.00 60.00 60.00

24013 013-0012 39 01S39 30500606 NOX 46.67 46.67 46.67

24021 021-0013 21 01S21 30500706 NOX 46.67 46.67 46.67

24021 021-0013 22 01S22 30500706 NOX 46.67 46.67 46.67

24043 043-0008 24 01S24 30500606 NOX 46.67 46.67 46.67

36001 4012200004 U00002 OX1FP 30501202 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012200004 U00003 FZ1FP 30501204 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012200004 U00003 FZ2FP 30501204 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012200004 U00003 SS1FP 30501206 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012200004 U00012 OX2FP 30501202 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012200004 U00013 FC2FP 30501204 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012400001 041000 K12FP 30500706 NOX 20.00 20.00 20.00

36039 4192600021 U00K18 00CEP 30500706 NOX 20.00 20.00 20.00

36113 5520500013 0UKILN G02FP 30500606 NOX 20.00 20.00 20.00

42019 420190024 101 4 30500706 NOX 0.00 52.38 52.38

42019 420190024 121 4 30500706 NOX 0.00 52.38 52.38

42073 420730024 226 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 54.29 54.29

42073 420730024 227 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 60.00 60.00
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-8

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITEID EU ID

PROCESS 

ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

42073 420730024 228 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 54.18 54.18

42073 420730026 501 1 30500706 NOX 0.00 56.52 56.52

42073 420730026 502 1 30500706 NOX 0.00 56.52 56.52

42077 420770019 101 2 30500606 NOX 0.00 54.40 54.40

42079 420790013 101 1 30501201 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790013 102 1 30501201 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790013 103 1 30501204 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790013 104 1 30501204 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790060 104 1 30501301 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42095 420950006 102 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 57.04 57.04

42095 420950006 122 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 57.04 57.04

42095 420950012 101 2 30500706 NOX 0.00 45.21 45.21

42095 420950012 102 2 30500706 NOX 0.00 45.21 45.21

42095 420950045 142 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42095 420950045 143 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42095 420950127 101 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42095 420950127 102 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42095 420950127 103 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42095 420950127 104 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42133 421330060 200 4 39000602 NOX 0.00 45.21 45.21

Control Measure: Glass and Fiberglass Furnaces

24510 510-0285 10 01S10 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

25027 1200856 04 0304 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

25027 1200856 05 0304 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

34005 45982 U6 OS0 39999991 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75475 U1 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75475 U3 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75475 U35 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75475 U37 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75475 U5 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75503 U2 OS1001 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75503 U3 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75503 U4 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75503 U5 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U12 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U143 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U144 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U146 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U150 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U151 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U6 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75506 U1 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75506 U1 OS3 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34023 18070 U1 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34033 65499 U1 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34033 65499 U2 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34033 65499 U3 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-9

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITEID EU ID

PROCESS 

ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

36001 4010300016 KILNSG 10BEI 39001399 NOX 20.00 20.00 20.00

36001 4010300016 KILNSG KNFFP 39001399 NOX 20.00 20.00 20.00

36001 4012200004 EI0001 E20EI 39000689 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36011 7055200004 AFURNC FRNFP 30501402 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36015 8070400036 000001 O1AFP 30501402 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36069 8320500041 UFURNC FURFP 30501403 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36089 6403000002 U00001 101FP 30501401 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36089 6403000002 U00003 300FP 30501416 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36101 8460300008 PCCTNK GL2FP 30501416 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

42003 4200300164 003 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300164 007 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300164 008 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300165 P01 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300165 P02 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300165 P04 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300227 003 1 30590003 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300227 003 2 30590003 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300342 002 1 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300342 002 3 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42007 420070012 103 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42007 420070012 104 1 30501408 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42007 420070012 105 1 30501408 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42007 420070022 102 1 30501799 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42027 420270021 P101 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42027 420270021 P102 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42027 420270021 P102 3 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42027 420270021 P103 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42031 420310009 102 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42031 420310009 S105A 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42039 420390012 101 1 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42039 420390012 102 1 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42041 420410013 101 1 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42041 420410013 102 1 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42045 420450041 101 1 30501410 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42051 420510020 101 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42051 420510020 102 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42065 420650003 110 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42065 420650007 103 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42065 420650007 104 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790008 101 1 30501704 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790008 102 1 30501704 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790008 103 1 30501701 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790018 101 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790018 101 2 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790018 102 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790018 102 2 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790018 103 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-10

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPS SITEID EU ID

PROCESS 

ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

42083 420830002 101 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42083 420830002 201 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42083 420830006 101 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42083 420830006 102 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42083 420830006 103 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42095 420950047 101A 3 30501701 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42095 420950047 103A 3 30501701 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42117 421170020 P109 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42117 421170020 P124 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42117 421170020 P127 1 30501408 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42125 421250001 107 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42125 421250001 107 3 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42129 421290233 101 2 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42129 421290233 102 2 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42129 421290553 101 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42133 421330066 104 3 30501414 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-11

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table E-2 NonEGU BOTW Control Factors for ICI Boilers

Boiler Size Range (mmBtu/hour)

< 25 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 250 >250

SCC CF0_25 CF25_50 CF50_100 CF100_250 CF250 SCC_L4 SCC_L3

10200104 10 50 10 40 0 Traveling Grate (Overfeed) Stoker Anthracite Coal

10200202 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200203 10 50 10 40 0 Cyclone Furnace Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200204 10 50 10 40 0 Spreader Stoker Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200205 10 50 10 40 0 Overfeed Stoker Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200206 10 50 10 40 0 Underfeed Stoker Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200212 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Tangential) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200222 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Subbituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200401 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 6 Oil Residual Oil

10200402 10 50 10 40 0 10-100 Million Btu/hr ** Residual Oil

10200403 10 50 10 40 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr ** Residual Oil

10200404 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 5 Oil Residual Oil

10200405 10 50 10 40 0 Cogeneration Residual Oil

10200501 10 50 10 40 0 Grades 1 and 2 Oil Distillate Oil

10200502 10 50 10 40 0 10-100 Million Btu/hr ** Distillate Oil

10200503 10 50 10 40 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr ** Distillate Oil

10200504 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 4 Oil Distillate Oil

10200505 10 50 10 40 0 Cogeneration Distillate Oil

10200601 10 50 10 75 0 > 100 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10200602 10 50 10 75 0 10-100 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10200603 10 50 10 75 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10200604 10 50 10 75 0 Cogeneration Natural Gas

10200701 10 50 10 75 0 Petroleum Refinery Gas Process Gas

10200704 10 50 10 75 0 Blast Furnace Gas Process Gas

10200707 10 50 10 75 0 Coke Oven Gas Process Gas

10200710 10 50 10 75 0 Cogeneration Process Gas

10200799 10 50 10 75 0 Other: Specify in Comments Process Gas

10200802 10 50 10 40 0 All Boiler Sizes Petroleum Coke

10200901 10 10 10 10 10 Bark-fired Boiler Wood/Bark Waste

10200902 10 10 10 10 10 Wood/Bark-fired Boiler Wood/Bark Waste
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-12

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Boiler Size Range (mmBtu/hour)

< 25 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 250 >250

SCC CF0_25 CF25_50 CF50_100 CF100_250 CF250 SCC_L4 SCC_L3

10200903 10 10 10 10 10 Wood-fired Boiler - Wet Wood (>=20% moisture) Wood/Bark Waste

10200904 10 10 10 10 10 Bark-fired Boiler (< 50,000 Lb Steam) ** Wood/Bark Waste

10200905 10 10 10 10 10 Wood/Bark-fired Boiler (< 50,000 Lb Steam) ** Wood/Bark Waste

10200906 10 10 10 10 10 Wood-fired Boiler (< 50,000 Lb Steam) ** Wood/Bark Waste

10200907 10 10 10 10 10 Wood Cogeneration Wood/Bark Waste

10200908 10 10 10 10 10 Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture) Wood/Bark Waste

10201001 10 50 10 75 0 Butane Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)

10201002 10 50 10 75 0 Propane Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)

10201003 10 50 10 75 0 Butane/Propane Mixture: Specify Percent Butane in Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)

10300101 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal Anthracite Coal

10300102 10 50 10 40 0 Traveling Grate (Overfeed) Stoker Anthracite Coal

10300103 10 50 10 40 0 Hand-fired Anthracite Coal

10300203 10 50 10 40 0 Cyclone Furnace (Bituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300206 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300207 10 50 10 40 0 Overfeed Stoker (Bituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300208 10 50 10 40 0 Underfeed Stoker (Bituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300209 10 50 10 40 0 Spreader Stoker (Bituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300225 10 50 10 40 0 Traveling Grate (Overfeed) Stoker (Subbituminous C Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300226 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom Tangential (Subbitumin Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300401 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 6 Oil Residual Oil

10300402 10 50 10 40 0 10-100 Million Btu/hr ** Residual Oil

10300403 10 50 10 40 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr ** Residual Oil

10300404 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 5 Oil Residual Oil

10300501 10 50 10 40 0 Grades 1 and 2 Oil Distillate Oil

10300502 10 50 10 40 0 10-100 Million Btu/hr ** Distillate Oil

10300503 10 50 10 40 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr ** Distillate Oil

10300504 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 4 Oil Distillate Oil

10300601 10 50 10 75 0 > 100 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10300602 10 50 10 75 0 10-100 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10300603 10 50 10 75 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10300701 10 50 10 75 0 POTW Digester Gas-fired Boiler Process Gas

10300799 10 50 10 75 0 Other Not Classified Process Gas
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-13

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Boiler Size Range (mmBtu/hour)

< 25 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 250 >250

SCC CF0_25 CF25_50 CF50_100 CF100_250 CF250 SCC_L4 SCC_L3

10300811 10 50 10 75 0 Landfill Gas Landfill Gas

10300901 10 10 10 10 0 Bark-fired Boiler Wood/Bark Waste

10300902 10 10 10 10 0 Wood/Bark-fired Boiler Wood/Bark Waste

10300903 10 10 10 10 0 Wood-fired Boiler - Wet Wood (>=20% moisture) Wood/Bark Waste

10300908 10 10 10 10 0 Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture) Wood/Bark Waste

10301002 10 50 10 75 0 Propane Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)

10301003 10 50 10 75 0 Butane/Propane Mixture: Specify Percent Butane in Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-14

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table E-3 Area Source BOTW Control Factors for Adhesives and Sealants Application, 

Asphalt Paving, Consumer Products, and Portable Fuel Containers

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

Control Measure: Adhesives and Sealants

09 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

11 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

23 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

34 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

Control Measure: Asphalt Paving

09 2461022000 VOC 20.00 20.00 20.00

24 2461022000 VOC 20.00 20.00 20.00

25 2461022000 VOC 20.00 20.00 20.00

33 2461022000 VOC 20.00 20.00 20.00

34 2461022000 VOC 75.00 75.00 75.00

36 2461022000 VOC 20.00 20.00 20.00

42 2461022000 VOC 0.00 20.00 20.00

Control Measure: Consumer Products

09 2465000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460100000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460200000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460400000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460500000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460600000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460800000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460900000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460100000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460200000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460400000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460500000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460600000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460800000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460900000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460100000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460200000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460400000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460500000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460600000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460800000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-15

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

23 2460900000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

24 2465000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

25 2460000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

33 2460000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

34 2465000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

36 2460000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

42 2465000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460100000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460200000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460400000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460500000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460600000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460800000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460900000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

Control Measure: Portable Fuel Containers

09 2501060300 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501011010 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501011011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501011012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501011015 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501011016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501012010 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501012011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501012012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501012015 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501012016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501011011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501011012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501011016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501012011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501012012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501012016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

23 2501060300 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501011011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501011012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501011016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501012011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501012012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501012016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

25 2501011000 VOC 0.00 23.20 58.00

25 2501012000 VOC 0.00 23.20 58.00

33 2501060300 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

34 2501000120 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

36 2501011011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

36 2501011012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

36 2501011016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

36 2501012011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-16

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

36 2501012012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

36 2501012016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

42 2501060300 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

44 2501060300 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00
Final TSD for MANE-VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007

Appendix E – BOTW Source Control Factors Page E-17

MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

Table E-4 Area Source BOTW Control Factors for ICI Boilers

SCC

Control 

Factor SCC_L4 SCC_L3 SCC_L2

2102001000 18.9 Total: All Boiler Types Anthracite Coal Industrial

2102002000 18.9 Total: All Boiler Types Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal

Industrial

2102004000 18.9 Total: Boilers and IC 

Engines

Distillate Oil Industrial

2102005000 18.9 Total: All Boiler Types Residual Oil Industrial

2102006000 18.9 Total: Boilers and IC 

Engines

Natural Gas Industrial

2102007000 18.9 Total: All Boiler Types Liquified Petroleum Gas 

(LPG)

Industrial

2102008000 10.0 Total: All Boiler Types Wood Industrial

2102011000 10.0 Total: All Boiler Types Kerosene Industrial

2103001000 19.5 Total: All Boiler Types Anthracite Coal Commercial/Institutional

2103002000 19.5 Total: All Boiler Types Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal

Commercial/Institutional

2103004000 19.5 Total: Boilers and IC 

Engines

Distillate Oil Commercial/Institutional

2103004001 19.5 Distillate Oil Commercial/Institutional

2103004002 19.5 Distillate Oil Commercial/Institutional

2103005000 19.5 Total: All Boiler Types Residual Oil Commercial/Institutional

2103006000 19.5 Total: Boilers and IC 

Engines

Natural Gas Commercial/Institutional

2103007000 19.5 Total: All Combustor 

Types

Liquified Petroleum Gas 

(LPG)

Commercial/Institutional

2103008000 10.0 Total: All Boiler Types Wood Commercial/Institutional

2103011000 10.0 Total: All Combustor 

Types

Kerosene Commercial/Institutional
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

Documentation of 2018 Emissions from Electric Generating Units 

in the Eastern United States for 

MANE-VU’s Regional Haze Modeling

Revised Final Draft 

28 April 2008 

Prepared for: 

Mid-Atlantic / Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) 

Prepared by: 

Alpine Geophysics, LLC 

387 Pollard Mine Road 

Burnsville, NC 28714 

Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA) 

8900 LaSalle Road 

Suite 636 

Towson, MD 21286 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

Alpine Geophysics, LLC (Alpine), was under contract with the Mid-Atlantic Regional Air 

Management Association (MARAMA) to assist in the revision, analysis, and adjustment of 

emission inventories and associated factors necessary to provide data and inputs required for air 

quality analyses and state implementation plan (SIP) submittals. 

Greg Stella of Alpine prepared a final draft of this document for MANE-VU/MARAMA under 

Work Order #7 of the MANE-VU Future Year Emissions Inventory Umbrella Contract. This 

work was supported by funds provided to MARAMA by the Ozone Transport Commission 

(OTC) through their memorandum of agreement. OTC's funding for this work was provided by 

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement XA 97318101. 

MARAMA further revised Section 5 of the document after receipt of Mr. Stella’s final work 

product. MARAMA provided text and tables to reflect emissions inventory analysis that 

continued after the expiration of Alpine’s contract. 

Special recognition is given to Julie McDill, MARAMA’s project manager, who initiated the 

collection and aggregation of documentation used to prepare this report. Ms. McDill and Susan 

Wierman, MARAMA’s Executive Director provided analytical and editorial contributions to the 

preparation of this document, and Patrick Davis of MARAMA and Dr. John Graham of 

NESCAUM contributed to emissions inventory data analysis and summaries. 

This report was prepared for use by the MANE-VU States and does not necessarily represent the 

position of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 1

2 PREPARATION OF EGU FORECASTS ........................................................................... 2

2.1 EGU FORECAST METHODS DOCUMENT ............................................................................... 3

2.2 THE INTEGRATED PLANNING MODEL (IPM) ........................................................................ 4

2.3 U.S. EPA USE OF IPM ......................................................................................................... 4

2.3.1 EPA’s Base Case 2004 ............................................................................................................................ 5

2.3.2 EPA CAIR Case ....................................................................................................................................... 6

2.3.3 EPA’s CAIR Modeling Limitations .......................................................................................................... 6

2.4 RPO USE OF IPM – PHASE I ................................................................................................ 7

2.5 RPO ADJUSTMENTS TO IPM – PHASE II .............................................................................. 8

2.6 STATE RESULTS – PHASE II .................................................................................................. 9

2.7 MANE-VU SPONSORED CAIR PLUS IPM MODELING ...................................................... 11

3 POST PROCESSING OF IPM OUTPUT ......................................................................... 12

3.1 USE OF SMOKE EMISSIONS PROCESSING MODEL ............................................................. 12

3.2 PREPARING IPM OUTPUT FOR USE IN SMOKE MODEL ..................................................... 12

3.2.1 IPM to NIF ............................................................................................................................................. 13

3.3 STATE RESULTS – PHASE II AUGMENTED .......................................................................... 18

3.4 NIF TO IDA ....................................................................................................................... 18

4 MODIFICATIONS BY OTHER REGIONS .................................................................... 20

4.1 EMISSION CONTROL MODIFICATIONS WITHIN VISTAS, MRPO, AND CENRAP ............... 20

4.2 EMISSION FACTOR AND CONTROL MODIFICATIONS FOR VISTAS EMISSION SOURCES ..... 20

4.3 EMISSION INVENTORY REPLACEMENT WITHIN WRAP DOMAIN ........................................ 21

4.4 ELIMINATING DOUBLE COUNTING OF EGU UNITS ............................................................ 21

4.5 PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM PHASE II ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS ............................. 22

4.6 REVISED RESULTS – VISTAS BASE G2 ADJUSTMENT ....................................................... 24

5 ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENTS BY NORTHEASTERN STATES AND MODELERS 

FOR REGIONAL HAZE SIP MODELING ................................................................... 26

5.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 26

5.2 BEST AVAILABLE RETROFIT TECHNOLOGY (BART) ......................................................... 26

5.3 MANE-VU STATE MODIFICATIONS OF IPM RESULTS ...................................................... 26

5.4 MANE-VU EGU STRATEGY ............................................................................................. 27

5.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF MANE-VU CONTROL STRATEGY FOR KEY EGUS .......................... 28

5.6 STATE RESULTS – NORTHEASTERN STATE ADJUSTMENTS ................................................. 30

6 EGU PREPARATION TIMELINE ................................................................................... 33

7 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 34
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

LIST OF TABLES 

Table 1. State Level Fuel Use and Emission Summary; 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f.xls. 10 

Table 2. SCC Default Heat Content and Stack Parameters from IPM to NIF Conversion. 15 

Table 3. EPA-Approved Emission Factor File for CO, VOC, filterable PM, and NH3. 16 

Table 4. EPA-approved condensable PM emission factor assignment. 17 

Table 5. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f with Pollutant 

Augmentation. Modeling file ida_egu_18_basef_2453605.txt from VISTAS 

BaseF. (fossil-only) 19 

Table 6. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTAS Base G Modeling file 

ptinv_egu_2018_11sep2006.txt. Based on 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f with adjustments 

from VISTAS, MRPO, and WRAP. 23 

Table 7. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTAS Base G2 Modeling file 

egu_18_vistas_g2_20feb2007.txt. Based on 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f with 

adjustments from VISTAS, MRPO, and WRAP. 25 

Table 8. Comparison of Regional SO2 Emissions Estimates (1000 tons per year) 

 29 

Table 9. State Level 2018 Emission Summary; March 2008 MANE-VU EGU Modeling 

Inventory 31

LIST OF APPENDICES 

Appendix A. Top Electric Generating Emission Points Contributing to Visibility 

Impairment in MANE-VU in 2002 34 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

1 

1 INTRODUCTION 

1.1 Background 

Development of an emissions inventory is an important foundation for performing regional scale 

atmospheric modeling for regulatory air quality management. The accuracy of the atmospheric 

model’s prediction of air quality depends, in part, on the accurate representation of emissions 

from a variety of source sectors including point, area, non-road, on-road and biogenic sources. 

Electric generating units (EGUs) are an important point source sector and are often considered 

for controls to meet air quality objectives. Therefore, it is especially important to accurately 

represent and document EGU emissions and associated characteristics in a regulatory modeling 

application. This report is intended to describe the development of future year EGU emission 

estimates for use in Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) 2018 regional haze 

modeling. 

This document synthesizes information from several documents that already describe parts of the 

process of preparing emissions estimates and provides information not yet included in other 

documents. It covers the following: preparation of the inter-Regional Planning Organization 

(RPO) Integrated Planning Model® (IPM) runs commonly referred to as the Visibility 

Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS) IPM runs, the postprocessing of those runs to create Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) input 

files, the modification of those files to reflect state estimates of emissions, and the adjustments 

made by MANE-VU modelers to maintain the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) cap. It also 

provides background information about preparing EGU forecasts and related work by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

2 

2 PREPARATION OF EGU FORECASTS 

Emission projections for point sources are dependent upon changes in source level activity, the 

emission factors or installed controls. The approach taken to project point source emissions 

depends on the level of detail necessary in the projection year file. Changes in point source 

emissions are accounted for by a combination of growth, control, and retirement rates. Growth 

rates are applied to estimate the overall change in activity, while retirement rates are applied to 

estimate the decrease in emissions activity from existing sources. Retirement (and replacement 

of these sources with new sources) must be considered because regulations affecting new sources 

may differ from those affecting existing sources. 

The projection year control factor accounts for both changes in emission factors due to 

technology improvements and new levels of control required by regulations. The control factor 

accounts for three variables: regulation control, rule effectiveness, and rule penetration. 

Control factors are closely linked to the type of emission process (identified by Source 

Classification Code (SCC)) and secondarily to the type of industry identified by Standard 

Industrial Classification (SIC). Point source projections should account for Federal, State, and 

local regulations affecting these categories. 

A complicating factor is the requirement for emission offsets in nonattainment areas through 

New Source Review requirements. This may be accounted for by 1) restricting growth under the 

assumption that it will be offset; 2) applying reductions to selected source categories to account 

for the emission growth which must be offset; or 3) selecting the individual sources, based on a 

cost analysis, from which offsets are likely to come. 

When projecting Electricity Generating Unit (EGU) emissions in the Eastern United States, 

emission trading should be considered. There are three general approaches to performing 

projections while accounting for such trading schemes. The first option is to optimize control 

levels across the domain based on the cost of alternative controls. The second option is to survey 

individual sources to determine how they will comply (will they apply controls and sell or buy 

allowances) and use this as the basis for the future year control level. The third option is to apply 

the control level used to establish the budget to all affected sources and ignore which sources 

may choose to buy or sell credits/allowances. 

Other factors which must be considered include programs, such as fuel switching, designed to 

provide source flexibility in meeting future air quality requirements. Fuel switching refers to 

instances where a unit historically burned one primary fuel, such as coal, and under a "fuel 

switching" program the unit would burn an alternate fuel, such as natural gas, during a certain 

period of time and may switch back to the "historic" fuel for some or all of the year. Fuel 

switching is often done in cases where sources average their emissions to meet federal mandates. 

Fuel switching may also be used as a seasonal compliance strategy (e.g., switching from residual 

fuel oil to natural gas in order to reduce NOx emissions during the ozone season. The variation in 

emissions over the course of the year caused by fuels switching must be calculated properly in 

projections. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

3 

Repowering is another example of a planned change in emission rates which should be 

considered. In this case, the unit may be switching entirely from coal to natural gas or may be 

completing a major modification which would lower the emission rate. 

Spatial allocation is another factor which must be considered, particularly if air quality modeling 

will be performed using the projection. For point sources, important questions are which 

facilities will retire and where new growth will occur. Changes in land use patterns may also 

impact the location of point source emissions. As undeveloped and rural areas become suburban 

and urban areas, the number of point sources in that area will increase. 

As can be seen from the discussion above, any number of complicating issues can lead to 

emission forecasts which may differ from user to user. An inconsistent decision made between 

two parties can lead to significant differences in growth, control, or placement of emissions from 

point source forecasts. For this reason, the RPOs made a conscious decision to utilize consistent 

forecasting methods for EGU emissions, as they are one of the most significant contributors to 

regional haze in the United States. This decision, to coordinate on the projection of EGU source 

emissions, led to the preparation of an EGU forecast methods document from which a 

coordinated decision was made on methods to develop EGU emissions in future years. 

2.1 EGU Forecast Methods Document 

Early in the planning process there was a joint agreement by the RPOs to work together to 

develop future year EGU emissions estimates based on the use of the Integrated Planning 

Model® (IPM). The decision to use IPM modeling resulted in part on a study of EGU forecast 

methods by E.H. Pechan and Associates, Inc. (Pechan) for the Midwest Regional Planning 

Organization (MRPO) (Pechan, 2004), which recommended IPM as a viable methodology. 

Although IPM results were available from work conducted by EPA to support their rulemaking 

for the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), the RPOs concluded that certain model inputs needed 

to be revised. Thus, the RPOs decided to work together to hire contractors to conduct new IPM 

modeling and to post-process the IPM results. This section describes the recommendation to use 

IPM. 

The Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) sought contractor assistance in 

reviewing emissions inventory growth for existing and new EGUs (Pechan, 2004). Because the 

results of EGU emission forecasts are used in urban or regional scale air quality modeling 

exercises to estimate future year air pollutant concentrations, growth methods are needed to 

supply model-ready emission model inputs. The purpose of LADCO’s project was to begin to 

examine EGU growth methods. 

The primary pollutants of interest were sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), 

particulate matter (PM), ammonia (NH3), and mercury (Hg). Projection years of interest included 

2009 (the approximate time for ozone and PM2.5 attainment) and 2018 (a longer term regional 

haze planning horizon). The geographic area of interest was the eastern half of the United States 

(to capture the trading issues affecting the Midwest States). 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

4 

This 2004 Pechan report provided a detailed evaluation of three EGU growth modeling methods 

of interest to the LADCO States for consideration in developing its own approach. These 

evaluations addressed the following attributes of each modeling approach: 

• Description of primary analytical modeling methods; 

• Geographic areas of application; 

• Advantages; and 

• Disadvantages. 

The material in this evaluation was intended to be used to determine which of the currently 

available modeling approaches might be best suited for use by the LADCO States (and other 

RPOs) for future state implementation plan (SIP) and air dispersion modeling work. The models 

evaluated in this report included the IPM, the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS), and 

the Electric Power Market Model (EPMM). 

Based on the conclusions and summary of the report (Pechan, 2004), the four participating RPOs 

(MANE-VU, MRPO, VISTAS, and the Central Regional Air Planning Association, CENRAP) 

decided to use IPM as the tool for forecasting EGU emissions. 

2.2 The Integrated Planning Model (IPM) 

IPM was developed by ICF Consulting, Inc. (ICF) and used to support public and private sector 

clients. This model is a multi-regional, dynamic, deterministic linear programming model of the 

U.S. electric power sector. It provides forecasts of least-cost capacity expansion, electricity 

dispatch, and emission control strategies for meeting energy demand and environmental, 

transmission, dispatch, and reliability constraints. It can be used to evaluate the cost and 

emissions impacts of proposed policies to limit emissions of SO2, NOx, carbon dioxide (CO2), 

and Hg from the electric power sector. The IPM model was a key analytical tool used by EPA in 

developing CAIR and the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR). 

Among the factors that make IPM particularly well suited to model multi-emissions control 

programs are (1) its ability to capture complex interactions among the electric power, fuel, and 

environmental markets; (2) its detail-rich representation of emission control options 

encompassing a broad array of retrofit technologies along with emission reductions through fuel 

switching, changes in capacity mix and electricity dispatch strategies; and (3) its capability to 

model a variety of environmental market mechanisms, such as emissions caps, allowances, 

trading, and banking. IPM's ability to capture the dynamics of the allowance market and its 

provision of a wide range of emissions reduction options are particularly important for assessing 

the impact of multi-emissions environmental policies like CAIR and CAMR. 

2.3 U.S. EPA Use of IPM 

The U.S. EPA uses IPM to analyze the projected impact of environmental policies on the electric 

power sector in the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

5 

2.3.1 EPA’s Base Case 2004 

The EPA’s Base Case 2004 (EPA, 2005a) served as the starting point against which EPA 

compared various policy scenarios. It is a projection of electricity sector activity that takes into 

account federal and state air emission laws and regulations whose provisions were either in effect 

or enacted and clearly delineated at the time the base case was finalized in August 2004. 

Regulations mandated under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA), but whose 

provisions have not yet been finalized, were not included in the base case. These include: 

• Measures to Implement Ozone and Particulate Matter (PM) Standards: EPA Base Case 

2004 predates and so does not include the provisions of CAIR, the primary federal 

regulatory measure for achieving the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) 

for ozone (8-hour standard of 0.08 ppm) and fine particles (24-hour average of 65 ug/m3 

or less and annual mean of 15 ug/m3 for particles of diameter 2.5 micrometers or less, 

i.e., PM2.5). EPA Base Case 2004 was used to evaluate policy alternatives which 

ultimately resulted in CAIR. The final CAIR was issued on March 10, 2005. EPA Base 

Case 2004 includes measures to implement ozone and particulate matter standards to the 

extent that some of the state regulations included in EPA Base Case 2004 contain 

measures to bring non-attainment areas into attainment. Individual permits issued by 

states in response to ozone and particulate matter standards are not captured in the base 

case. 

• Mercury Regulations on Electric Steam Generating Units: EPA Base Case 2004 

predates both CAMR, which was issued by EPA on March 15, 2005 and the “Maximum 

Achievable Control Technology” (MACT) standards, which were scheduled to be 

promulgated by December 15, 2004, but, pending litigation, have been superseded by 

CAMR. Consequently, this base case does not include any federal regulatory measures 

for mercury control. (CAMR was vacated in 2008.) 

• Clean Air Visibility Rules: On July 1, 1999, EPA issued Regional Haze Regulations to 

meet the national goal for visibility established in Section 169A of the CAAA, which 

calls for “prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of 

visibility in Class I areas (156 national parks and wilderness areas), which impairment 

results from manmade air pollution.” The regulations required states to submit revised 

SIPs that (1) establish goals that provide for reasonable progress towards achieving 

natural visibility conditions at Class I areas, (2) adopt a long-term control strategy that 

includes such measures as are necessary to achieve the reasonable progress goals, and (3) 

require Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for sources in listed source 

categories placed in operation between 1962 and 1977. 

In effect, EPA Base Case 2004 offered a snapshot projection of the electric sector assuming that 

the only future environmental regulations were those with provisions known at the time that the 

base case assumptions were finalized. While not necessarily an accurate reflection of what would 

actually occur, this assumption ensured that the base case was policy neutral with respect to 

future environmental policies. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

6 

2.3.2 EPA CAIR Case 

On January 30, 2004, EPA proposed CAIR, which set emission reduction requirements for 29 

States and the District of Columbia. Those emission reduction requirements were based on 

achieving highly cost-effective emission reductions from large electricity generating units. 

While EPA believed that the modeling it initially performed for the January 2004 proposal 

provided a reasonable estimate of the impact of requiring highly cost-effective emission 

reductions from electricity generating units, it did not exactly model the proposed control region. 

For both SO2 and NOx, EPA used modeling assumptions that differed slightly from the January 

2004 CAIR proposal. For SO2 in particular, EPA modeled the program assuming a cap on 

national emissions rather than in the 29 States proposed. Although EPA believed the modeling 

done at that time provided a reasonable approximation of the impacts of the original CAIR, 

because 92 percent of the SO2 emissions in the 48 contiguous States occur in the 28 States that 

were covered by the proposal, EPA completed additional analysis. This additional analysis 

examined the effect of covering the geographic region proposed in the January 30, 2004 proposal 

using the NOx emissions cap and a close approximation of the SO2 cap proposed for CAIR (EPA, 

2005a). 

For the supplemental proposal, EPA performed refined modeling of the emission reduction 

requirements proposed on January 30, 2004. In this refined modeling, EPA modeled the exact 

control regions for both SO2 and NOx, as proposed. 

2.3.3 EPA’s CAIR Modeling Limitations 

The U.S. EPA’s modeling was based on its best judgment for various input assumptions that 

were uncertain, particularly assumptions for future fuel prices and electricity demand growth 

(EPA, 2004). In addition, modeling using IPM did not take into account the potential for 

advancements in the capabilities of pollution control technologies for SO2 and NOx removal as 

well as reductions in their costs over time. 

Retirement Ratios: EPA issued a CAIR supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking that 

proposed two alternatives for how the SO2 reduction target would be achieved. The proposal 

took comment on implementing the reduction requirements in the second phase either by using a 

2.86 to 1 ratio (which would match the 65 percent SO2 reduction target) of acid rain allowances 

to emissions, or alternatively, by implementing the reductions using a 3 to 1 ratio (for 

administrative simplicity) and then letting States create and distribute additional allowances 

equal to the surplus created by the 3 to 1 ratio to achieve the proposed 65 percent reduction. In 

either case, the effective cap on SO2 emissions from the power sector would be the same. 

Modelers assumed a 3 to 1 Title IV allowance retirement ratio for 2015 and beyond to implement 

the reductions in the proposed control region. The model did not add back the 130,000 tons of 

SO2 from over-compliance that would result from this ratio. Therefore, in this modeling, EPA 

analyzed slightly greater SO2 emission reductions than required by the proposal. This assumption 

was made for modeling simplicity and was expected to result in a slight overestimate of costs for 

the proposal and of the emissions reductions achieved. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

7 

BART: The EPA did not incorporate any best achievable retrofit technology (BART) modeling 

in this analysis. BART would achieve reductions in non-CAIR States and had the potential to 

mitigate leakage issues. 

Demand Response: EPA’s 2004 CAIR case includes a demand response to increased gas prices 

but not electricity prices. In the model, increased gas prices would prompt the public to curtail 

their use of gas and encourage them to seek substitutes. However, no provision for demand 

response was included for electricity prices. If demand had been allowed to change in response 

to increasing prices of electricity,, one can assume that consumers would have reduced their 

demand for electricity, lowering electricity prices and reducing generation and emissions to some 

extent. 

State Rules: Only some State adopted rules were incorporated into EPA’s modeling framework. 

A list of the State Multi-pollutant regulations used in IPM 2.1, IPM 2.1.6, and IPM 2.1.9 can be 

located in Appendix 3-2 of EPA’s Standalone Documentation for EPA Base Case 2004 (v.2.1.9) 

Using the Integrated Planning Model (EPA, 2005a). 

Because of the limitations noted above, the RPOs decided to initiate their own IPM modeling 

based on the EPA’s latest update of the IPM input framework, called IPM 2.1.9. EPA completed 

the input framework for IPM 2.1.9 in March of 2003. 

2.4 RPO Use of IPM – Phase I 

In August 2004, VISTAS contracted with ICF to run IPM to provide revised utility forecasts for 

2009 and 2018 under two future scenarios – Base Case and CAIR Case (ICF, 2004). The Base 

Case represented the current operation of the power system under laws and regulations as known 

at the time the run was made, including those that come into force in the study horizon. The 

CAIR Case was the Base Case with the proposed CAIR rule superimposed. Run results were 

parsed at the unit level for the 2009 and 2018 run years. 

In August 2004, MRPO contracted with Pechan to post-process the VISTAS’ IPM outputs to 

provide the (National Emission Inventory Input Format) NIF formatted emission files needed for 

the regional inventory. The IPM output files were delivered by ICF to VISTAS in November 

2004 and the post-processed data files were delivered by Pechan to the MRPO in December 

2004. 

These IPM runs (VISTAS_CAIR_2) and the NIF files that were generated from the parsed data 

sets are commonly referred to as the Phase I Inter-RPO runs. The Phase I runs were ultimately 

not used in RPO modeling of regional haze, as further revisions to the inputs were necessary 

once CAIR was adopted. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

8 

2.5 RPO Adjustments to IPM – Phase II 

On March 10, 2005, EPA issued the final CAIR. A consortium of RPOs, (MANE-VU, VISTAS, 

MRPO, and CENRAP) conducted another round of IPM modeling which reflected changes to 

control assumptions based on the final CAIR as well as additional changes to model inputs based 

on state and local agency and stakeholder comments. Several conference calls were conducted in 

the spring of 2005 among the participating RPOs to discuss and provide comments on IPM 

assumptions related to six main topics: power system operation, generating resources, emission 

control technologies, set-up parameters, financial assumptions, and fuel assumptions. Based on 

these discussions, VISTAS sponsored a new set of IPM runs to reflect the final CAIR 

requirements as well as certain changes to IPM assumptions that were agreed to by the RPOs. 

ICF performed the following four runs using IPM during the summer of 2005. This set of IPM 

runs is referred to as the VISTAS Phase II analysis or Inter-RPO v.2.1.9 runs. 

• Base Case with EPA 2.1.9 coal, gas, and oil price assumptions (VISTASII_BC_1Z1). 

• Base Case with EPA 2.1.9 coal and gas supply curves adjusted for the U.S. Energy 

Information Administration’s most recent Annual Energy Outlook (AEO 2005) reference 

case price and volume relationships (VISTASII_BC_2Y). 

• Strategy Case with EPA 2.1.9 coal, gas and oil price assumptions (VISTASII_PC_1f). 

• Strategy Case with EPA 2.1.9 coal and gas supply curves adjusted for AEO 2005 

reference case price and volume relationships (VISTASII_PC_2C). 

The above runs were parsed for 2009 and 2018 run years. The output taken from the Strategy 

Case with EPA 2.1.9 coal, gas, and oil price assumptions (VISTASII_PC_1f) is also referred to 

as the Inter-RPO CAIR Case IPM 2.1.9 and is the basis for discussion in the remainder of this 

report. 

The Phase II scenarios were based on VISTAS Phase I and EPA IPM 2.1.9 assumptions (EPA, 

2005b). Additional changes that were implemented in the above four runs are summarized below 

and in associated documentation (ICF, 2007): 

• Unadjusted AEO 2005 electricity demand projections were used. (U.S. EPA runs were 

adjusted to reflect reduced demand due to voluntary conservation projects sponsored by 

U.S. EPA) 

• Gas supply curves were adjusted for AEO 2005 reference case price and volume 

relationships. The EPA 2.1.9 gas supply curves were scaled such that IPM solved for 

AEO 2005 gas prices when the power sector gas demand in IPM is consistent with AEO 

2005 power sector gas demand projections. 

• The coal supply curves used in EPA 2.1.9 were scaled such that the average mine mouth 

coal prices that the IPM was solving in aggregated coal supply regions were comparable 

to AEO 2005. Coal grades and supply regions contained in AEO 2005 and EPA 2.1.9 

were not directly comparable. An iterative approach was used to obtain comparable 

results. The coal transportation matrix was not updated with Energy Information 

Administration (EIA) assumptions due to significant differences between the EPA 2.1.9 

and EIA AEO 2005 coal supply and coal demand region configurations. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

9 

• The cost and performance of new units were updated to AEO 2005 reference case levels. 

• The run years 2008, 2009, 2012, 2015, 2018, 2020 and 2026 were modeled. 

• The AEO 2005 life extension costs for fossil and nuclear units were incorporated. 

• The extensive NEEDS comments provided by VISTAS, MRPO, CENRAP and MANEVU were incorporated into the Phase I NEEDS input file. 

• MANE-VU’s comments in regards to the northeast state regulations were incorporated. 

• Northeast Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) were modeled based on the Regional 

Greenhouse Gas Initiative analysis. A single RPS cap was modeled for MA, RI, NY, NJ, 

MD, and CT. These states could buy credits from NY or from the PJM Interconnection 

and New England model regions. 

• Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) and Scrubber Feasibility Limits: No limits were 

applied in 2008, 2009 and 2010 to the capacity for installing these emissions controls. 

• The Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR) was not modeled. 

• Modelers assumed a Title IV SO2 Bank for 2007 of 4.98 million tons. 

• The investments required under the Illinois Power, Mirant and First Energy NSR 

settlements (as identified during spring 2005) were incorporated in the above runs. 

For the Phase II inter-RPO set of IPM runs, ICF generated two different parsed files for each of 

the two scenarios. One file includes all fuel burning units (fossil, biomass, landfill gas) as well as 

non-fuel burning units (hydro, wind, etc.). The second file contains just the fossil-fuel burning 

units (e.g., emissions from biomass and landfill gas are omitted). In all RPOs the fossil-only file 

was used for modeling. This is consistent with EPA, since EPA used the fossil only results for 

CAIR analyses. 

2.6 State Results – Phase II 

Table 1 presents unmodified State level fuel use and emission results from the 2018 Inter-RPO 

CAIR Case IPM v. 2.1.9 fossil-only parsed file (VISTASII_PC_1f). Note that IPM produces 

only NOx and SO2 emissions estimates. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

10 

Table 1. State Level Fuel Use and Emission Summary; 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f.xls. (fossil only) 

State RPO Summer Annual Summer NOx Annual NOx Annual SO2

Connecticut MANE-VU 62.1572 142.7141 1,521 3,418 6,697

Delaware MANE-VU 41.9472 92.7542 5,485 12,341 35,442

District Of Columbia MANE-VU 2.0774 4.8716 49 103 83

Maine MANE-VU 21.8494 49.8748 804 1,827 5,436

Maryland MANE-VU 195.3393 437.8991 6,832 14,709 28,065

Massachusetts MANE-VU 188.0653 433.3227 8,004 18,157 17,486

New Hampshire MANE-VU 32.4638 73.8699 1,393 3,089 7,469

New Jersey MANE-VU 140.8000 304.7240 6,432 13,636 32,495

New York MANE-VU 282.4272 669.0821 10,926 24,376 51,445

Pennsylvania MANE-VU 687.1446 1,540.1322 36,329 82,881 135,946

Rhode Island MANE-VU 15.1701 40.0407 244 576 55

Vermont MANE-VU 1.3677 3.0597 74 105 35

MANE-VU Total 1,670.8093 3,792.3450 78,093 175,219 320,651

Alabama VISTAS 605.2513 1,329.1117 19,416 41,715 190,029

Florida VISTAS 831.5942 1,813.5433 26,620 56,506 139,526

Georgia VISTAS 687.9659 1,530.2279 26,228 56,180 178,196

Kentucky VISTAS 494.6026 1,121.9188 27,904 64,099 229,596

Mississippi VISTAS 211.7079 443.3923 4,269 8,895 27,226

North Carolina VISTAS 431.1262 984.5996 25,412 57,774 102,217

South Carolina VISTAS 326.3757 749.2039 20,240 46,318 118,584

Tennessee VISTAS 300.8087 672.6405 13,348 29,873 112,343

Virginia VISTAS 305.6546 710.9991 18,443 43,144 80,602

West Virginia VISTAS 477.7910 1,080.9570 22,556 51,208 124,464

VISTAS Total 4,672.8781 10,436.5940 204,435 455,711 1,302,784

Illinois MRPO 564.3359 1,281.6624 31,214 71,234 241,136

Indiana MRPO 665.8976 1,534.4126 40,820 95,376 376,864

Michigan MRPO 537.6731 1,257.6784 42,629 98,685 398,562

Ohio MRPO 773.6334 1,785.3989 35,888 83,129 215,501

Wisconsin MRPO 303.7451 691.5260 19,794 45,701 155,369

MRPO Total 2,845.2851 6,550.6783 170,345 394,124 1,387,433

Arkansas CENRAP 211.9455 479.1864 14,836 33,097 82,605

Iowa CENRAP 238.7101 548.7369 22,252 51,119 147,305

Kansas CENRAP 213.4288 465.8685 37,207 83,333 81,486

Louisiana CENRAP 225.6282 481.9880 14,240 30,432 74,263

Minnesota CENRAP 175.6582 388.8279 17,940 41,029 85,847

Missouri CENRAP 416.5504 918.5720 34,350 77,660 280,887

Nebraska CENRAP 113.8064 255.2901 22,524 50,781 73,629

Oklahoma CENRAP 357.5522 745.1097 36,695 76,048 113,680

Texas CENRAP 1,710.8244 3,236.6605 79,449 153,837 339,433

CENRAP Total 3,664.1040 7,520.2400 279,493 597,336 1,279,135

Arizona WRAP 442.6160 1,022.0551 36,168 81,858 60,640

California WRAP 602.8505 1,403.6297 10,464 23,767 5,447

Colorado WRAP 215.1782 486.7281 31,074 70,171 87,163

Idaho WRAP 14.5575 34.1372 309 718 0

Montana WRAP 88.4363 200.1442 17,034 38,504 22,066

Nevada WRAP 179.3334 408.0758 20,978 47,404 31,172

New Mexico WRAP 155.2294 344.7868 32,965 74,010 52,917

North Dakota WRAP 131.5025 297.0199 31,745 71,711 108,645

Oregon WRAP 109.6842 255.3128 4,968 11,330 10,034

South Dakota WRAP 16.3929 36.8730 6,457 14,574 12,085

Utah WRAP 146.1278 330.1164 26,905 60,782 37,819

Washington WRAP 155.7190 362.9219 11,625 26,379 12,236

Wyoming WRAP 202.3566 457.1643 35,935 81,182 40,265

WRAP Total 2,459.9843 5,638.9652 266,628 602,390 480,488

National Total 15,313.0609 33,938.8226 998,994 2,224,779 4,770,490

Fuel Use (TBtu) Emissions (Tons)
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

11 

2.7 MANE-VU Sponsored CAIR Plus IPM Modeling 

Using the IPM Phase II RPO modeling platform MANE-VU contracted with ICF to evaluate the 

impact of both tightening the SO2 and NOx CAIR caps and to expand the CAIR region to include 

the electricity generating sector in additional states the Eastern United States. As part of this 

analysis, ICF developed a new Base Case that implemented EPA’s CAIR, CAMR and CAVR 

policies and a Policy Case with lower SO2 and NOx CAIR caps in an extended region. The new 

Base Case was developed for comparison to the Policy Case. The model assumptions and data 

used in this analysis are somewhat different than those in the RPO Phase II analysis and are 

described in Section B of the project report (ICF, 2007). Neither the base or policy cases from 

the CAIR Plus project were used in subsequent SIP modeling. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

12 

3 POST PROCESSING OF IPM OUTPUT 

3.1 Use of SMOKE Emissions Processing Model 

On behalf of MANE-VU, NESCAUM modelers used an emissions processing model to prepare 

data produced by the IPM model for use in air quality and visibility modeling. The Sparse 

Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) Modeling System is an emissions processing 

system designed to create gridded, speciated, hourly emissions for input into a variety of air 

quality models, such as EPA’s Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model and 

Regional Modeling System for Aerosols and Deposition (REMSAD) (Houyoux, et. al., 2000). 

SMOKE supports area, biogenic, mobile (both onroad and nonroad), and point source emissions 

processing for criteria, particulate, and toxic pollutants. For biogenic emissions modeling, 

SMOKE uses the Biogenic Emission Inventory System, version 2.3 (BEIS2) and version 3.09 

and 3.12 (BEIS3). SMOKE is also integrated with the onroad emissions model MOBILE6. 

The sparse matrix approach used throughout SMOKE permits rapid and flexible processing of 

emissions data. Flexible processing comes from splitting the processing steps of inventory 

growth, controls, chemical speciation, temporal allocation, and spatial allocation into 

independent steps whenever possible. The results from these steps are merged together in the 

final stage of processing using vector-matrix multiplication. It allows individual steps (such as 

adding a new control strategy, or processing for a different grid) to be performed and merged 

without having to redo all of the other processing steps. Individual emission scenarios were 

simulated for MANE-VU using the SMOKE Modeling System. 

The Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), on behalf of MANEVU and its participating States, conducted regional air quality simulations for calendar year 2002 

and several future periods (NESCAUM, 2008). This work was directed at satisfying a number of 

goals under the Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP), including a contribution assessment, a 

pollution apportionment for 2018, and the evaluation of visibility benefits of control measures 

being considered for achieving reasonable progress goals and establishing a long-term emissions 

management strategy for MANE-VU Class I areas. The modeling tools utilized for these 

analyses include the Fifth-Generation NCAR / Penn State Mesoscale Model (MM5), SMOKE, 

CMAQ and REMSAD, and incorporate tagging features that allow for the tracking of individual 

source regions or measures. These tools have been evaluated and found to perform adequately 

relative to U.S. EPA modeling guidance. 

As described below, in order for NESCAUM to process the Electric Generating Unit (EGU) 

emissions generated by the Integrated Planning Model® (IPM) procedures noted above, a series 

of intermediate steps were required to get the activity and emission data into the appropriate 

format for SMOKE processing. 

3.2 Preparing IPM Output for Use in SMOKE Model 

IPM can produce projections at the regional, state, plant, or unit level. Data must be parsed to 

provide the unit level information required for chemical transport modeling. Parsing involves 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

13 

developing detailed unit level information from the model’s projections at the model plant level. 

ICF parsed the VISTASII_PC_1f data for use by the RPOs. 

Further post-processing of IPM parsed output is needed to prepare the files for use by the 

SMOKE emissions processing model. The following sections describe the intermediate steps 

necessary to make these conversions. The first step is the augmentation of the IPM parsed output 

files to include additional unit level characteristics and pollutant estimates necessary for one 

atmosphere modeling. This step converts the IPM parsed data files into EPA’s National Emission 

Inventory Input Format (NIF). The second step is the additional conversion of these NIF files 

into the Inventory Data Analyzer (IDA) format required by the SMOKE emissions processor. 

3.2.1 IPM to NIF 

After running IPM, ICF provided an initial spreadsheet file containing unit-level records for 

both: 

(1) “existing” units (those currently in operation during the modeled base year) and 

(2) committed/planned or new generic aggregates (new generic units expected to come 

online or identified as needed to meet electric generation demand in a geographic 

area). 

IPM parsed file records include unit and fuel type data; existing, retrofit (for SO2 and NOx), and 

separate NOx control information; annual SO2 and NOx emissions and heat input; summer season 

(May-September) NOx and heat input; July day NOx and heat input; coal heat input by coal type; 

nameplate capacity megawatt (MW), and State FIPS codes (Federal Information Processing 

codes used to identify geographic areas). Existing units also had county FIPS code, a unique 

plant identifier (ORISPL) and unit ID (also called boiler ID) (BLRID); generic units did not have 

these data. 

The processing of IPM parsed data to NIF format included estimating emissions not generated by 

IPM and adding control efficiencies, stack parameters, latitude-longitude coordinates, and State 

identifiers (plant ID, point ID, stack ID, process ID) from a series of lookup tables or by 

matching to individual units as configured in base year 2002 emission files (Pechan, 2005). 

Additionally, new generic units created by IPM were sited in a county and given appropriate IDs. 

This processing is described in more detail below. 

Generic Units: The new generic units and associated data were prepared by transforming the 

generic aggregates into units similar in size and fuel to existing units in terms of the available 

data. Generic aggregates were split into smaller generic units based on their unit types and 

capacity. Each generic unit was provided a dummy ORIS unique plant and boiler ID, and were 

given a county FIPS code based on an algorithm that sited each generic unit by assigning a sister 

plant that is in a county based on its attainment/nonattainment status. Within a State, existing 

plants (in county then ORIS plant code order) in attainment counties were used first as sister sites 

to new generic units (to obtain county location), followed by existing plants in PM 

nonattainment counties, followed by existing plants in 8-hour ozone nonattainment counties. No 

States identified counties that should not be considered when siting new generic units, so this 

process was identical to the one used for EPA IPM post-processing under CAIR. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

14 

SCCs were assigned to existing units using unit/fuel/firing/bottom type data. SCCs were 

assigned to generic units using unit and fuel type information. Latitude-longitude coordinates 

were assigned, first using the EPA-provided data files, secondly using an in-house contractor 

developed latitude-longitude file, and lastly using county centroids. These additional location 

files were only used when the data were not provided in the original 2002 base year files. Stack 

parameters were then assigned to each unit, first using the EPA-provided data files, secondly 

using an in-house stack parameter file based on previous EIA-767 data, and lastly using an EPA 

June 2003 SCC-based default stack parameter file. These data were only used when the data 

were not provided in the 2002 base year files. 

IPM does not calculate emissions for all pollutants necessary for regional haze modeling. 

Therefore additional data were required to estimate VOC, CO, filterable primary PM10 and 

PM2.5, PM condensable, and NH3 emissions. Thus, ash and sulfur contents were assigned by first 

using 2002 EIA-767 values for existing units or SCC-based defaults; filterable PM10 and PM2.5

efficiencies were obtained from the 2002 EGU NEI that were based on 2002 EIA-767 control 

data and the PM Calculator program (a default of 99.2 percent is used for coal units if 

necessary); fuel use was back calculated from the given heat input and a default SCC-based heat 

content; and emission factors were obtained from an EPA-approved emission factor file based on 

AP-42 emission factors. Table 2 presents the SCC-based default heat content and stack 

parameters used when actual data were not available. Table 3 (worksheet sccemfac100704 from 

MRPOpostprocdatafiles.xls, Pechan 2005) reflects emission factors used to develop emission 

estimates of CO, VOC, filterable PM, and NH3. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

15 

Table 2. SCC Default Heat Content and Stack Parameters from IPM to NIF Conversion. 

Heat Content Height Diameter Temp Velocity

SCC Fuel (Btu/SCC Unit) (ft) (ft) (degrees F) (ft/s)

10100201 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 603.2 19.8 281.2 76.5

10100202 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 509.7 14.6 226.0 62.0

10100203 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 491.6 16.6 278.4 80.5

10100204 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 225.0 0.6 67.2 2.4

10100211 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

10100212 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 445.6 17.4 275.2 77.6

10100217 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 399.3 10.8 245.6 40.1

10100221 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 983.0 22.8 350.0 110.0

10100222 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 468.5 16.0 254.7 65.6

10100223 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 446.8 15.9 308.0 93.6

10100224 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 255.5 10.0 251.3 15.3

10100226 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 495.8 18.9 259.2 91.2

10100238 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 600.0 22.5 315.0 78.0

10100301 Lignite Coal 12.9149 427.5 22.3 232.8 74.2

10100302 Lignite Coal 12.9149 483.5 21.0 229.4 92.4

10100303 Lignite Coal 12.9149 462.0 21.7 271.3 72.5

10100317 Lignite Coal 12.9149 326.7 12.3 326.7 74.7

10100601 Natural Gas 1023.8846 263.9 10.3 236.0 46.9

10100801 Coke 27.4376 371.3 5.5 122.4 20.4

10102018 Waste Coal 12.0929 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

20100201 Natural Gas 1023.8846 62.0 10.0 585.3 61.3

20100301 Gasified Coal 1023.8846 62.0 10.0 585.3 61.3

Stack Parameters
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

16 

Table 3. EPA-Approved Emission Factor File for CO, VOC, filterable PM, and NH3. 

SCC FUEL COEF VOCEF PM10EF PM25EF NH3EF PMFLAG

10100201 BIT 0.5000 0.0400 2.6000 1.4800 0.030 A

10100202 BIT 0.5000 0.0600 2.3000 0.6000 0.030 A

10100203 BIT 0.5000 0.1100 0.2600 0.1100 0.030 A

10100204 BIT 5.0000 0.0500 13.2000 4.6000 0.030

10100211 BIT 0.5000 0.0400 2.6000 1.4800 0.030 A

10100212 BIT 0.5000 0.0600 2.3000 0.6000 0.030 A

10100217 BIT 18.0000 0.0500 12.4000 1.3640 0.030

10100221 SUB 0.5000 0.0400 2.6000 1.4800 0.030 A

10100222 SUB 0.5000 0.0600 2.3000 0.6000 0.030 A

10100223 SUB 0.5000 0.1100 0.2600 0.1100 0.030 A

10100224 SUB 5.0000 0.0500 13.2000 4.6000 0.030

10100226 SUB 0.5000 0.0600 2.3000 0.6000 0.030 A

10100238 SUB 18.0000 0.0500 16.1000 4.2000 0.030

10100301 LIG 0.2500 0.0700 1.8170 0.5214 0.030 A

10100302 LIG 0.6000 0.0700 2.3000 0.6600 0.030 A

10100303 LIG 0.6000 0.0700 0.8710 0.3690 0.030 A

10100317 LIG 0.1500 0.0300 12.0000 1.4000 0.030

10100601 NG 84.0000 5.5000 1.9000 1.9000 3.200

10100801 PC 0.6000 0.0700 7.9000 4.5000 0.397 A

10102018 WC 0.1500 0.0300 12.0000 1.4000 0.030

20100201 NG 83.8628 2.1477 1.9380 1.9380 6.560

20100301 IGCC 34.6500 2.2050 11.5500 11.5500 6.560

Notes:

1. SCCs beginning with 101002 (coal), 101003 (coal), 101008 (coke), or 101020 (waste coal), 

emission factors in LB/TON; SCCs beginning with 101006 (natural gas), 201002 (natural gas), 

or 201003 (IGCC), emission factors are in LB/E6FT3.

2. If PMFLAG = 'A', then multiply ash content with PM emission factor.

Source: Table derived from worksheet sccemfac100704 from MRPOpostprocdatafiles.xls, Pechan 2005. 

Condensable PM: To estimate total primary PM emissions, additional calculations were 

conducted to derive condensable PM emissions from these sources. In MANE VU and VISTAS 

PM condensable emissions were calculated based on factors derived from AP-42 defaults. In 

MRPO no condensable emissions were estimated or included in the inventory. (Janssen, 2008) 

Table 4 (worksheet pmcdef from MRPOpostprocdatafiles.xls, Pechan 2005) shows these PM 

condensable emission factors and SCC assignments. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

17 

Table 4. EPA-Approved Condensable PM Emission Factor Assignment. 

SCC PMCDEF (LB/E6BTU)

10100201, 10100202, 10100203, 10100211, 10100212, 10100221, 10100222, 

10100223, 10100226, 10100301, 10100302, 10100303 0.02002

10100201, 10100202, 10100203, 10100211, 10100212, 10100221, 10100222, 

10100223, 10100226, 10100301, 10100302, 10100303 1 (0.1 * sulfur content - 0.03)3

10100204, 10100224 0.0400

10100217, 10100238, 10100317, 10102018 0.0100

10100601 0.0057

10100801 0.0100

20100201, 20100301 0.0047

Notes:

1. If the emission factor is less than 0.01, then it is set equal to 0.01.

2. AND there is either an SO2 FGD or a PM scrubber (for MRPO post-processing); or AND there is an SO2 wet FGD 

(for EPA post-processing).

3. AND there is any PM control other than a scrubber and there is no SO2 control (for MRPO post-processing); or 

AND there is any control other than an SO2 wet FGD (for EPA post-processing).

Source: Table derived from worksheet pmcdef from MRPOpostprocdatafiles.xls, Pechan 2005. 

Additional Pollutants: As noted above, in processing IPM parsed data to convert it to NIF 

format, emissions of additional pollutants were estimated. Emissions for 28 temporal-pollutant 

combinations were estimated since there are seven pollutants (VOC, CO, primary PM10 and 

PM2.5, NH3, SO2 and NOx) and four temporal periods (annual, summer season, winter season, 

July day). 

Crosswalk Match to 2002 Inventory: The final step in the IPM to NIF conversion process was to 

match the IPM unit IDs with the identifiers in the base year 2002 inventory for existing EGUs. A 

crosswalk file was used to obtain FIPS State and county, plant ID (within State and county), and 

point ID. If the FIPS State and county, plant ID and point ID were in the 2002 base year NIF 

tables, then the process ID and stack ID were obtained from the NIF; otherwise, defaults, 

described above, were used. 

The post-processed files were then provided in NIF 3.0 format. Two sets of tables were 

developed : “NIF files” for IPM units that had a crosswalk match and were in the 2002 base year 

inventory, and “NoNIF files” for IPM units that were not in the 2002 base year inventory (which 

included existing units with or without a crosswalk match as well as generic units). Two special 

cases relating to the crosswalk match were handled as follows: 

1. One-to-many match: At a given plant, if one IPM boiler ID was matched to more 

than one point ID, the boiler data were put on the first point ID records; records from 

the other point IDs were deleted from the relevant tables. 

2. Many-to-one match: At a given plant, if more than one IPM boiler ID was matched 

to one point ID, all the boilers’ emissions (tons), throughput (really heat input in 

MMBtu), and capacity (MW) were summed (“summed boiler”) and put on that point 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

18 

ID’s records in the relevant tables. The values for stack parameters and latitudelongitude values were those from the first record summed. 

3.3 State Results – Phase II Augmented 

Summarizing the results of the estimation of additional pollutants, Table 5 presents additional 

pollutant augmented State level emission results from the 2018 Inter-RPO CAIR Case IPM v. 

2.1.9 fossil-only parsed file (VISTASII_PC_1f with pollutant augmentation; found in modeling 

file ida_egu_18_basef_2453605.txt from VISTAS BaseF). A comparison of RPO totals for SO2

and NOx shows that these are the same as presented in Table 1. 

3.4 NIF to IDA 

The main purpose of the SMOKE conversion task was to convert EGU emission inventories 

provided in NIF format into the IDA format required by the SMOKE model for the criteria 

pollutants VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, PM10, PM2.5, and NH3. Annual and seasonal emissions were 

taken directly from the NIF structured inventories with no alternate temporal calculations 

performed (e.g., estimate seasonal emissions from annual or annual from seasonal). The temporal 

allocation module of the SMOKE emissions processor was intended to be used to further define 

temporal distribution of these emissions. 

No quality assurance (QA) related to the reported values in the NIF files was conducted (e.g., it 

was assumed that reported emission levels were correct) and therefore the QA focus was to 

maintain the integrity of the mass files in the conversion to IDA. 

Each set of NIF structured data had a unique set of relational tables necessary to maintain the 

information required in each source sector based on its reporting requirements. Conversion 

scripts to read the information from each of these relational data sets and convert them to the 

IDA structures required by this task were implemented by Alpine (Alpine, 2006). Prior to and 

after the conversion from NIF to IDA, a list of emission summary reports was developed to 

check that the emissions input into the conversion process were the same as output into the IDA 

formatted files. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

19 

Table 5. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f with Pollutant Augmentation. 

Modeling file ida_egu_18_basef_2453605.txt from VISTAS Base F. (fossil-only) 

State RPO NOx SO2 VOC CO PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3

Connecticut MANE-VU 3,418 6,697 145 9,837 959 927 341

Delaware MANE-VU 12,341 35,442 117 1,183 2,950 2,438 76

District Of Columbia MANE-VU 103 83 5 154 104 99 12

Maine MANE-VU 1,827 5,436 53 4,057 296 279 139

Maryland MANE-VU 14,709 28,065 575 11,831 8,253 6,433 435

Massachusetts MANE-VU 18,157 17,486 484 13,860 3,918 3,233 1,059

New Hampshire MANE-VU 3,089 7,469 73 1,697 2,268 2,156 124

New Jersey MANE-VU 13,636 32,495 352 7,611 4,017 3,515 564

New York MANE-VU 24,376 51,445 758 22,242 11,031 9,343 1,472

Pennsylvania MANE-VU 82,881 135,946 1,920 41,445 31,580 23,756 1,790

Rhode Island MANE-VU 576 55 42 1,627 157 156 127

Vermont MANE-VU 105 35 3 117 26 25 9

MANE-VU Total 175,218 320,651 4,528 115,659 65,558 52,360 6,148

Alabama VISTAS 41,714 190,029 1,599 27,888 20,401 15,936 2,009

Florida VISTAS 56,506 139,526 2,027 58,982 24,804 18,403 3,948

Georgia VISTAS 56,180 178,196 1,940 33,040 25,929 19,087 2,374

Kentucky VISTAS 64,099 229,596 1,623 17,103 24,659 18,813 782

Mississippi VISTAS 8,895 27,226 511 12,228 7,270 4,358 918

North Carolina VISTAS 57,774 102,217 1,232 14,386 31,797 26,551 847

South Carolina VISTAS 46,318 118,584 932 11,263 26,740 22,629 793

Tennessee VISTAS 29,873 112,343 922 7,391 15,008 12,988 449

Virginia VISTAS 43,144 80,602 863 16,482 19,652 17,300 881

West Virginia VISTAS 51,208 124,464 1,447 12,946 23,538 16,968 721

VISTAS Total 455,711 1,302,784 13,096 211,709 219,798 173,034 13,722

Illinois MRPO 71,233 241,136 2,229 17,868 32,650 30,132 1,152

Indiana MRPO 95,376 376,864 2,105 19,416 35,082 27,835 1,274

Michigan MRPO 98,685 398,562 1,623 17,522 38,902 34,276 1,091

Ohio MRPO 83,129 215,501 2,254 23,832 42,754 33,323 1,773

Wisconsin MRPO 45,701 155,369 1,101 11,901 15,629 14,246 626

MRPO Total 394,124 1,387,432 9,312 90,539 165,016 139,813 5,915

Arkansas CENRAP 33,097 82,605 696 11,429 3,897 3,326 814

Iowa CENRAP 51,119 147,305 770 8,759 10,033 8,615 569

Kansas CENRAP 83,333 81,486 798 7,203 8,520 6,807 461

Louisiana CENRAP 30,432 74,263 660 11,043 3,966 3,590 919

Minnesota CENRAP 41,029 85,847 674 5,563 8,162 7,034 343

Missouri CENRAP 77,660 280,887 1,579 13,165 18,456 16,769 800

Nebraska CENRAP 50,781 73,629 450 3,590 2,296 1,915 217

Oklahoma CENRAP 76,048 113,680 1,008 28,182 5,561 4,840 1,355

Texas CENRAP 153,837 339,433 4,988 102,583 38,952 31,631 6,424

CENRAP Total 597,336 1,279,135 11,622 191,518 99,842 84,528 11,902

Arizona WRAP 81,858 60,640 1,170 29,037 11,515 9,644 2,189

California WRAP 23,767 5,447 1,496 56,188 5,442 5,337 4,402

Colorado WRAP 70,171 87,163 667 12,139 4,751 4,166 609

Idaho WRAP 718 0 36 1,398 113 113 109

Montana WRAP 38,504 22,066 326 3,035 7,217 4,636 193

Nevada WRAP 47,404 31,172 479 9,862 5,244 4,315 750

New Mexico WRAP 74,010 52,916 554 5,991 13,435 7,637 388

North Dakota WRAP 71,711 108,645 784 9,937 5,670 4,757 324

Oregon WRAP 11,330 10,034 276 9,322 1,311 1,305 722

South Dakota WRAP 14,574 12,085 110 536 362 297 33

Utah WRAP 60,782 37,819 423 3,523 6,459 4,881 211

Washington WRAP 26,379 12,236 451 11,848 3,780 3,192 898

Wyoming WRAP 81,182 40,265 678 5,672 8,537 7,116 341

WRAP Total 602,389 480,488 7,449 158,487 73,834 57,395 11,170

National Total 2,224,778 4,770,490 46,007 767,912 624,049 507,129 48,857

IPM Generated Augmented Pollutants

Annual Emissions (Tons)
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

20 

4 MODIFICATIONS BY OTHER REGIONS 

4.1 Emission Control Modifications within VISTAS, MRPO, and CENRAP 

State and local agencies and invited stakeholders from VISTAS, MRPO, and CENRAP reviewed 

the results of the Inter-RPO Phase II set of IPM runs. These stakeholders primarily reviewed and 

commented on the IPM results with respect to IPM decisions on NOx post-combustion controls 

and SO2 scrubbers and provided additional information on when and where new SO2 and NOx

controls were planned to come online based on the best available data from state rules, 

enforcement agreements, compliance plans, permits, and discussions/commitments from 

individual companies. They also reviewed the IPM results to verify that known and existing 

controls and emission rates were properly reflected in the IPM runs. After considering 

comments, adjustments to the IPM results were made to specific units using any new information 

they had as part of the permitting process or other contact with the industry that indicated which 

units would install controls as a result of CAIR and when these new controls would come on-line 

(MACTEC, 2007; MRPO 2006; ENVIRON 2007). 

As described in the following section, some entities specified changes to the controls assigned by 

IPM to reflect their best estimates of emission control levels. These changes typically involved 

either 1) adding selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or scrubber controls to units where IPM did 

not predict SCR or scrubber controls, or 2) removing IPM-assigned SCR or scrubber controls at 

units where the commenting entity indicated there were no firm plans for controls at those units. 

At this point in the process MANE-VU decided not to make any changes to the northeastern state 

IPM output regardless of state knowledge of discrepancies with actual conditions. MANE-VU 

determined that IPM provided a reasonable estimate of the impact of the CAIR cap and trade 

program consistent with methods used by EPA, and planners were concerned that adjustments 

would not reflect the allocation of ALL allowed emissions under CAIR. 

In MANE-VU’s final modeling, many of the changes made by the other RPOs were included, 

but due to the timing of the release of revised data, the location with respect to the modeling 

domain, and need to progress with modeling, MANE-VU did not incorporate changes reflected 

in the final CENRAP EGU files. 

4.2 Emission Factor and Control Modifications for VISTAS Emission Sources 

VISTAS reviewed the PM and NH3 emissions from its States’ EGUs provided after the original 

IPM to NIF conversation conducted for the RPOs and identified significantly higher emissions in 

2009/2018 than in 2002. VISTAS determined this conversion used a set of PM and NH3

emission factors that were “the most recent EPA approved uncontrolled emission factors” for 

estimating 2009/2018 EGU emissions but were most likely not the same emission factors used 

by States for estimating these emissions in 2002. Thus, the emission increase from 2002 to 

2009/2018 was simply an artifact of the change in emission factors, not anything to do with 

changes in activity or control technology application. During this review, VISTAS additionally 

identified an inconsistent use of SCCs for determining emission factors between the base and 

future years. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

21 

Documentation (Alpine, 2005a, b) indicates that VISTAS adjusted the 2002 base year emissions 

inventory to account for these discrepancies in base year and future year PM and NH3 emission 

factor use. Using the latest “EPA-approved” uncontrolled emission factors by SCC, Alpine 

utilized data collected under EPA’s Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) or data 

reported by VISTAS. Alpine used reported annual heat input, fuel throughput, heat, ash, and 

sulfur content to estimate annual uncontrolled emissions for units identified as output by IPM. 

This step was conducted for non-CEM pollutants (CO, VOC, PM, and NH3) only. For PM 

emissions, the condensable component of emissions was calculated and added to the resulting 

PM primary estimations. The resulting emissions were then adjusted by any control efficiency 

factors reported in the CERR or VISTAS data collection effort. The second adjustment was to 

the future year inventories. Alpine updated the SCCs in the future year inventory to assign the 

same base year SCC. Using the same methods as described for the 2002 revisions, those nonIPM generated pollutants were estimated using IPM predicted fuel characteristics and base year 

2002 SCC assignments. 

In addition to the changes to the emission factor assignments, SCC, and IPM-assigned controls, 

VISTAS also specified other changes to the IPM results or converted IPM to NIF files. 

Comments on changes in stack parameters from the 2002 inventory were implemented in the 

converted files for the 2018 inventory. Changes to stack parameters were also made in cases 

where new controls were scheduled to be installed. In cases where an emission unit was 

projected to have an SO2 scrubber by 2018, some States were able to provide revised stack 

parameters for some units based on design features for the new control system. Other units 

projected to install scrubbers by 2018 were not far enough along in the design process to have 

specific design details. For those units, VISTAS made the following assumptions: 1) the 

scrubber is a wet scrubber; 2) keep the current stack height the same; 3) keep the current flow 

rate the same, and 4) change the stack exit temperature to 169 degrees F (this is the virtual 

temperature derived from a wet temperature of 130 degrees F) (MACTEC, 2007). VISTAS 

determined that exit temperature (wet) of 130 degrees F +/- 5 degrees F is representative of 

different size units and wet scrubber technology. 

4.3 Emission Inventory Replacement within WRAP Domain 

During the development of their EGU emission forecast, the western states RPO (WRAP) 

conducted an exercise where IPM was not used to prepare emission estimates from EGU 

sources. Using capacity factor adjustments and emission control assumptions, WRAP developed 

a forecast of EGU emissions based on its initial 2002 base year inventory (ERG, 2006). This 

revised forecast was used by many of the RPOs and replaced the emissions generated for the 

domain by IPM. This change by WRAP is reflected in the difference in State emission totals 

between Tables 5 and 6. As WRAP is outside the MANE VU modeling domain, this change was 

not reflected in MANE-VU modeling. MANE-VU did not change its boundary conditions to 

reflect this change. 

4.4 Eliminating Double Counting of EGU Units 

An additional set of procedures was used by MANE-VU and VISTAS to avoid double counting 

of EGU emissions in the 2018 point source inventory (MACTEC, 2006, 2007). Since each 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

22 

RPO’s 2002 emissions inventory file contained both EGUs and non-EGU point sources, and 

EGU emissions were projected using IPM, it was necessary to split the 2002 point source file 

into two components. The first component contained those emission units accounted for in the 

IPM forecasts. The second component contained all other point sources not accounted for in 

IPM. 

As described in the previous section, 2018 NIF files for EGUs were prepared from the IPM 

parsed files. All IPM matched units were initially removed from the 2018 point source inventory 

to create the non-EGU inventory (which was projected to 2018 using non-EGU growth and 

control factors). This was done on a unit-by-unit basis based on a cross-reference table that 

matched IPM emission unit identifiers (ORISPL plant code and BLRID emission unit code) to 

NIF emission unit identifiers (FIPSST state code, FIPSCNTY county code, State Plant ID, State 

Point ID). When there was a match between the IPM ORISPL/BLRID and the emission unit ID, 

the unit was assigned to the EGU inventory; all other emission units were assigned to the nonEGU inventory. 

If an emission unit was contained in the NIF files created from the IPM output, the 

corresponding unit was removed from the initial 2018 point source inventory. For VISTAS, the 

NIF 2018 EGU files from the IPM parsed files were then merged with the non-EGU 2018 files to 

create a complete 2018 point source scenario. 

Next, several ad-hoc QA/QC queries were done to verify that there was no double-counting of 

emissions in the EGU and non-EGU inventories: 

• The IPM parsed files were reviewed to identify EGUs accounted for in IPM. This list of 

emission units was compared to the non-EGU inventory derived from the IPM-NIF crossreference table to verify that units accounted for in IPM were not double-counted in the 

non-EGU inventory. As a result of this comparison, a few adjustments were made in the 

cross-reference table to add emission units for plants to ensure these units accounted for 

in IPM were moved to the EGU inventory. 

• The non-EGU inventory was further reviewed to identify remaining emission units with 

an Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code of “4911 Electrical Services” or Source 

Classification Code of “1-01-xxx-xx External Combustion Boiler, Electric Generation”. 

The list of sources meeting these selection criteria were compared to the IPM parsed file 

to ensure that these units were not double-counted. 

• VISTAS invited various stakeholder groups to review the 2018 point source inventory to 

verify whether there was any double counting of EGU emissions. In some instances, 

corrections were provided where an emission unit was double counted. 

4.5 Preliminary Results from Phase II Additional Modifications 

Table 6 summarizes the Base G emissions inventory for EGUs, presenting State level emission 

results from the 2018 Inter-RPO CAIR Case IPM v. 2.1.9 parsed file modified by VISTAS, 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

23 

MRPO, and WRAP per the methods noted in the above sections. Note that no changes occurred 

to the MANE-VU state emissions as a result of these changes. 

Table 6. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTAS Base G Modeling file 

ptinv_egu_2018_11sep2006.txt. Based on 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f (fossil-only) with adjustments 

from VISTAS, MRPO, and WRAP. 

State RPO NOx SO2 VOC CO PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3

Connecticut MANE-VU 3,418 6,697 145 9,836 959 927 341

Delaware MANE-VU 12,341 35,442 117 1,183 2,950 2,438 76

District Of Columbia MANE-VU 103 83 5 154 104 99 12

Maine MANE-VU 1,827 5,436 53 4,057 296 279 139

Maryland MANE-VU 14,709 28,065 575 11,831 8,253 6,433 435

Massachusetts MANE-VU 18,157 17,486 484 13,860 3,917 3,233 1,059

New Hampshire MANE-VU 3,089 7,469 73 1,697 2,268 2,156 124

New Jersey MANE-VU 13,636 32,495 352 7,611 4,017 3,515 564

New York MANE-VU 24,376 51,445 758 22,242 11,031 9,343 1,471

Pennsylvania MANE-VU 82,881 135,946 1,919 41,446 31,580 23,756 1,790

Rhode Island MANE-VU 576 55 42 1,627 157 156 127

Vermont MANE-VU 105 35 3 117 26 25 9

MANE-VU Total 175,219 320,651 4,528 115,660 65,558 52,360 6,148

Alabama VISTAS 62,860 135,782 1,620 21,611 7,385 4,380 1,033

Florida VISTAS 56,827 133,037 1,857 42,573 9,287 6,288 2,665

Georgia VISTAS 69,308 226,477 1,805 35,584 18,217 11,319 1,676

Kentucky VISTAS 59,740 211,225 1,344 12,125 6,194 4,067 436

Mississippi VISTAS 10,455 15,143 1,055 11,822 7,007 6,853 545

North Carolina VISTAS 56,526 96,402 1,147 16,376 32,676 26,014 608

South Carolina VISTAS 50,068 87,202 860 13,078 28,110 24,454 578

Tennessee VISTAS 30,008 112,353 886 7,126 15,861 13,321 241

Virginia VISTAS 60,615 109,391 921 14,017 13,505 11,757 553

West Virginia VISTAS 51,177 115,322 1,382 11,896 6,344 3,643 177

VISTAS Total 507,583 1,242,334 12,877 186,205 144,586 112,094 8,513

Illinois MRPO 71,233 241,136 2,229 17,868 32,649 30,132 1,152

Indiana MRPO 95,376 351,858 2,105 19,416 35,081 27,835 1,274

Michigan MRPO 78,605 288,006 1,623 17,521 38,902 34,276 1,091

Ohio MRPO 83,129 215,501 2,254 23,832 42,753 33,322 1,772

Wisconsin MRPO 45,701 155,369 1,101 11,901 15,629 14,246 626

MRPO Total 374,044 1,251,871 9,311 90,539 165,015 139,812 5,915

Arkansas CENRAP 33,097 82,605 696 11,429 3,897 3,326 814

Iowa CENRAP 51,119 147,305 770 8,758 10,033 8,615 569

Kansas CENRAP 83,333 81,486 798 7,203 8,520 6,807 461

Louisiana CENRAP 30,432 74,263 660 11,043 3,966 3,590 919

Minnesota CENRAP 41,029 85,847 674 5,563 8,162 7,035 343

Missouri CENRAP 77,660 280,887 1,579 13,165 18,456 16,769 799

Nebraska CENRAP 50,781 73,629 450 3,590 2,296 1,914 217

Oklahoma CENRAP 76,048 113,680 1,008 28,182 5,561 4,840 1,355

Texas CENRAP 153,837 339,433 4,988 102,581 38,952 31,630 6,424

CENRAP Total 597,336 1,279,135 11,622 191,515 99,842 84,527 11,901

Arizona WRAP 59,774 55,941 724 17,806 2,811 634 630

California WRAP 17,537 1,528 2,558 31,173 1,219 1,059 0

Colorado WRAP 77,113 60,914 1,465 18,939 3,138 307 537

Idaho WRAP 2,236 1,683 50 3,283 335 87 0

Montana WRAP 44,733 31,303 565 11,818 1,796 247 13

Nevada WRAP 54,300 22,118 1,570 10,598 4,230 768 903

New Mexico WRAP 32,925 17,796 695 10,976 794 627 43

North Dakota WRAP 82,741 152,828 909 13,647 3,958 2,645 383

Oregon WRAP 15,742 15,096 474 5,753 1,288 323 219

South Dakota WRAP 17,681 13,522 118 689 247 217 52

Utah WRAP 76,136 41,394 597 17,150 4,637 2,000 1,350

Washington WRAP 16,884 7,011 249 4,008 1,474 1,027 12

Wyoming WRAP 104,142 96,745 1,147 18,871 10,445 7,411 404

WRAP Total 601,942 517,879 11,122 164,711 36,371 17,353 4,547

National Total 2,256,124 4,611,869 49,460 748,629 511,371 406,146 37,024

Annual Emissions (Tons)
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

24 

4.6 Revised Results – VISTAS Base G2 Adjustment 

VISTAS further refined their future predictions based on further state input. The resulting 

modeling file was called the Base G2 inventory. Table 7 presents State level emission results 

from the Base G2 2018 Inter-RPO CAIR Case IPM v. 2.1.9 parsed file modified by VISTAS. 

Some states specified changes to the controls assigned by IPM to reflect their best estimates of 

emission control levels. These changes typically involved either 1) adding selective catalytic 

reduction (SCR) or scrubber controls to units where IPM did not predict SCR or scrubber 

controls, or 2) removing IPM-assigned SCR or scrubber controls at units where the commenting 

entity indicated their were no firm plans for controls at those units. These changes were based 

on those states’ best available information about where and when emissions controls were 

expected to be installed, as well as information concerning IPM-predicted plant closures that 

were deemed unlikely to occur. In comparing Table 7 with Table 6, it can be seen that the 

changes included in the Base G2 inventory were requested by the states of Florida, Georgia, and 

North Carolina. 

Note that no changes were made at this time by the MANE-VU states. The net effect of these 

changes was to reduce emissions of SO2 relative to either Table 5 or Table 6. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

25 

Table 7. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTAS Base G2 Modeling file 

egu_18_vistas_g2_20feb2007.txt. Based on 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f (fossil-only) with 

adjustments from VISTAS, MRPO, and WRAP. 

State RPO NOx SO2 VOC CO PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3

Connecticut MANE-VU 3,418 6,697 145 9,836 959 927 341

Delaware MANE-VU 12,341 35,442 117 1,183 2,950 2,438 76

District Of Columbia MANE-VU 103 83 5 154 104 99 12

Maine MANE-VU 1,827 5,436 53 4,057 296 279 139

Maryland MANE-VU 14,709 28,065 575 11,831 8,253 6,433 435

Massachusetts MANE-VU 18,157 17,486 484 13,860 3,917 3,233 1,059

New Hampshire MANE-VU 3,089 7,469 73 1,697 2,268 2,156 124

New Jersey MANE-VU 13,636 32,495 352 7,611 4,017 3,515 564

New York MANE-VU 24,376 51,445 758 22,242 11,031 9,343 1,471

Pennsylvania MANE-VU 82,881 135,946 1,919 41,446 31,580 23,756 1,790

Rhode Island MANE-VU 576 55 42 1,627 157 156 127

Vermont MANE-VU 105 35 3 117 26 25 9

MANE-VU Total 175,219 320,651 4,528 115,660 65,558 52,360 6,148

Alabama VISTAS 62,860 135,782 1,620 21,611 7,385 4,380 1,033

Florida VISTAS 58,341 139,200 1,904 42,947 9,355 6,331 2,665

Georgia VISTAS 69,308 75,051 1,805 35,584 18,217 11,319 1,676

Kentucky VISTAS 59,740 211,225 1,344 12,125 6,194 4,067 436

Mississippi VISTAS 10,455 15,143 1,055 11,822 7,007 6,853 545

North Carolina VISTAS 56,526 102,680 1,147 16,376 32,676 26,014 608

South Carolina VISTAS 50,068 87,202 860 13,078 28,110 24,454 578

Tennessee VISTAS 30,008 112,353 886 7,126 15,861 13,321 241

Virginia VISTAS 60,615 109,391 921 14,017 13,505 11,757 553

West Virginia VISTAS 51,177 105,932 1,382 11,896 6,344 3,643 177

VISTAS Total 509,098 1,093,959 12,923 186,579 144,654 112,137 8,513

Illinois MRPO 71,233 241,136 2,229 17,868 32,649 30,132 1,152

Indiana MRPO 95,376 351,858 2,105 19,416 35,081 27,835 1,274

Michigan MRPO 78,605 288,006 1,623 17,521 38,902 34,276 1,091

Ohio MRPO 83,129 215,501 2,254 23,832 42,753 33,322 1,772

Wisconsin MRPO 45,701 155,369 1,101 11,901 15,629 14,246 626

MRPO Total 374,044 1,251,871 9,311 90,539 165,015 139,812 5,915

Arkansas CENRAP 33,097 82,605 696 11,429 3,897 3,326 814

Iowa CENRAP 51,119 147,305 770 8,758 10,033 8,615 569

Kansas CENRAP 83,333 81,486 798 7,203 8,520 6,807 461

Louisiana CENRAP 30,432 74,263 660 11,043 3,966 3,590 919

Minnesota CENRAP 41,029 85,847 674 5,563 8,162 7,035 343

Missouri CENRAP 77,660 280,887 1,579 13,165 18,456 16,769 799

Nebraska CENRAP 50,781 73,629 450 3,590 2,296 1,914 217

Oklahoma CENRAP 76,048 113,680 1,008 28,182 5,561 4,840 1,355

Texas CENRAP 153,837 339,433 4,988 102,581 38,952 31,630 6,424

CENRAP Total 597,336 1,279,135 11,622 191,515 99,842 84,527 11,901

Arizona WRAP 59,774 55,941 724 17,806 2,811 634 630

California WRAP 17,537 1,528 2,558 31,173 1,219 1,059 0

Colorado WRAP 77,113 60,914 1,465 18,939 3,138 307 537

Idaho WRAP 2,236 1,683 50 3,283 335 87 0

Montana WRAP 44,733 31,303 565 11,818 1,796 247 13

Nevada WRAP 54,300 22,118 1,570 10,598 4,230 768 903

New Mexico WRAP 32,925 17,796 695 10,976 794 627 43

North Dakota WRAP 82,741 152,828 909 13,647 3,958 2,645 383

Oregon WRAP 15,742 15,096 474 5,753 1,288 323 219

South Dakota WRAP 17,681 13,522 118 689 247 217 52

Utah WRAP 76,136 41,394 597 17,150 4,637 2,000 1,350

Washington WRAP 16,884 7,011 249 4,008 1,474 1,027 12

Wyoming WRAP 104,142 96,745 1,147 18,871 10,445 7,411 404

WRAP Total 601,942 517,879 11,122 164,711 36,371 17,353 4,547

National Total 2,257,639 4,463,494 49,506 749,003 511,439 406,189 37,024

Annual Emissions (Tons)
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

26 

5 ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENTS BY NORTHEASTERN STATES AND MODELERS 

FOR REGIONAL HAZE SIP MODELING 

5.1 Introduction 

MANE VU used the G2 inventory as the basis for further adjustments to incorporate MANE-VU 

state changes and also to represent the MANE VU control strategy for key EGUs. These 

modifications resulted in a) SO2 emissions reductions at one MANE-VU EGU source subject to 

Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements, 2) emissions increases in MANE-VU 

to reflect states’ best estimates that some sources predicted by IPM to be closed would continue 

to operate and information about where and when emission controls would or would not be 

installed, 3) SO2 emissions reductions at key EGUs (or alternative facilities) to reflect the 

MANE-VU EGU strategy, and 4) increases in SO2 emissions to estimate the effect of emissions 

trading under the CAIR program. Each of these is explained below. 

5.2 Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) 

To assess the impacts of the implementation of the BART provisions of the Regional Haze Rule, 

NESCAUM included estimated reductions anticipated for BART-eligible facilities not covered 

by CAIR in the MANE-VU region in the 2018 CMAQ modeling analysis. A survey of state staff 

indicated that eight units would likely be controlled under BART alone. State-provided potential 

control technologies and levels of control for these sources were incorporated into the 2018 

emission inventory projections used in MANE-VU’s March 2008 modeling run (NESCAUM, 

2008b). The eight BART-eligible units included one EGU point source, which is located in 

Maine (Wyman Station).

5.3 MANE-VU State Modifications of IPM Results 

Previously, during development of the Base G and Base G2 inventories, MANE-VU states had 

relied on the RPO IPM model results (Base F) without revisions. In 2007, the MANE-VU states 

decided that they should revise the estimates, as other RPOs had done, to reflect their best 

estimates of future source operations and controls. State and regional staff reviewed and revised 

the IPM results with respect to when and where new SO2 controls were planned to come online. 

Modifications were based on state rules, enforcement agreements, compliance plans, permits, 

and commitments from individual companies. States reviewed the IPM results to verify that 

known and existing controls and emission rates were properly reflected in the IPM results. In 

addition, states noted that some units predicted by IPM to close were very unlikely to cease 

operation. 

The net effect of these adjustments was an increase in SO2 emissions in the MANE-VU region as 

a whole. In Delaware SO2 emissions decreased due to controls on a major source. Emissions in 

Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Rhode Island, and Vermont remained the same as 

predicted by RPO IPM 2.1.9 (Base F). Emissions of SO2 in other MANE-VU states increased. 

No changes were made in emissions of other pollutants. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

27 

5.4 MANE-VU EGU Strategy 

MANE-VU states have recognized that SO2 emissions from power plants are the single largest 

contributing sector to visibility impairment in the Northeast’s Class I areas. Sulfate formed 

through atmospheric processes from SO2 emissions are responsible for over half the mass and 

approximately 70-80 percent of the extinction on the worst visibility days (NESCAUM, 2006a, 

and b). The emissions from power plants dominate the SO2 inventory. 

A modeling analysis was conducted to identify those EGUs with the greatest impact on visibility 

in MANE-VU. As part of the MANE VU Contribution Assessment, two MANE-VU modeling 

centers undertook CALPUFF modeling to identify the top 100 stacks that impacted three of the 

MANE VU Class I areas in the base year, 2002. These three areas are Acadia, Brigantine and 

Lye Brook. Details of the modeling are provided in Appendix D of the Contribution 

Assessment. (NESCAUM, 2006a) The 100 top stacks for each Class I area are listed in Tables 

10 and 20 from Appendix D “Dispersion Model Techniques” of the Contribution Assessment. 

The two modeling centers used 2002 U.S. EPA Continuous Emission Monitoring System 

(CEMS) data reported by the power companies, which is stack based rather than emission unit 

based. A power plant may have several stacks. Each stack may vent emissions from one or 

more units at the plant. The two modeling centers also used different meteorological data—one 

used data from the MM5 model and the other used National Weather Service observation-based 

meteorology. 

There are differences between results from the two centers because of the differences in 

meteorological input data and also because of rounding when summing annual emissions. As a 

result the MM5-based modeling identified some stacks as being in the top 100 impacting a 

MANE-VU Class I area that were not identified by the observation-based modeling, and vice 

versa. For purposes of identifying key stacks, all stacks on either list were included. 

MARAMA combined the lists of the top 100 EGU stacks in Tables 10 and 20 from Appendix D 

of the Contribution Assessment and eliminated both duplications and stacks that were outside the 

MANE-VU consultation area. (The consultation area includes states contributing at least 2% of 

the sulfate monitored at MANE-VU Class I areas in 2002.) This process resulted in 167 unique 

stacks impacting one or more of the three MANE-VU Class I areas. The use of stacks rather 

than units or facilities was chosen as more consistent with the results of the modeling presented 

in the Contribution Assessment. The Contribution Assessment Appendix D tables did not 

identify the units or facilities that were modeled, only providing a CEMS Identification number. 

MARAMA used information contained in IPM input files to match up the plant name and type 

where the stack was located. The resulting list of 167 stacks is found in Appendix A of this 

report. 

MANE-VU asked states in the consultation area to pursue 90 percent control on all units 

emitting from those stacks by 2018. MANE-VU recognized that this level of control may not be 

feasible in all cases. NESCAUM modelers incorporated State comments gathered during the 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

28 

inter-RPO consultation process in estimating the impact of this strategy on visibility at Class I 

areas. This process is described below in Section 5.5. 

5.5 Implementation of MANE-VU Control Strategy for Key EGUs 

As part of the MANE-VU strategy to improve visibility, MANE-VU asked states to pursue a 90 

percent reduction in SO2 emissions from the 167 EGU stacks identified as described in Section 

5.4 and listed in Appendix A. MARAMA gathered information from MANE-VU, MRPO, and 

VISTAS states and regional staff to obtain information about anticipated emissions changes. 

State and local agencies and individual stakeholders from MANE-VU, MRPO and VISTAS 

reviewed and revised the IPM results with respect to controls planned to come online. They also 

reviewed the IPM results to verify that known and existing controls and emission rates were 

properly reflected in the IPM runs. In addition, commenters noted that some units predicted by 

IPM to be shutdown would not shutdown. 

Adjustments to the IPM results were made to specific units using information states had obtained 

as part of the permitting process or other contact with the industry that indicated which units 

would install controls as a result of CAIR and when these new controls would come on-line 

(Koerber, 2007; VISTAS 2007). In general, the changes at specific EGUs provided by VISTAS 

reflected their Base G2 inventory, and, as discussed with MRPO, the changes NESCAUM made 

to emissions from sources in the MRPO were consistent with sources where controls were 

predicted in EPA’s IPM 3.0 run for 2018, since MRPO modeling relied on IPM 3.0. In addition 

to the 167 stacks, MANE-VU incorporated further corrections to source emissions as requested 

by VISTAS states at the following locations: North Carolina (Cliffside), South Carolina 

(Jefferies), Kentucky (Spurlock), and Virginia (Chesapeake and Clinch River). . 

NESCAUM determined the desired emissions levels for the 167 key stacks based on a 90 percent 

reduction in continuous emissions monitoring data from 2002. This established a target 

emissions level for the region from those stacks. NESCAUM compared these levels with the 

information provided by the states for those sources. In each region, predicted 2018 emissions 

exceeded the target level. Therefore, emissions reductions from other sources were considered 

in order to meet the target emissions reductions for the region.(both within MANE-VU and in 

other RPOs). This resulted in a net decrease in emissions in all three affected RPOs. Emissions 

of SO2 would have decreased by over 14,000 tons per year in MANE-VU, over 304,000 tons per 

year in the Midwest, and over 197,000 tons per year in the VISTAS region. 

However, MANE-VU planners recognized that CAIR allows emissions trading, and that 

reductions at one unit could be offset increases at another unit within the CAIR region. Because 

most states do not restrict trading, MANE-VU decided that emissions should be increased to 

represent the implementation of the strategy for the 167 stacks within the limits of the CAIR 

program. Therefore, NESCAUM increased the emissions from states subject to the CAIR cap 

and trade program. For MANE-VU, 75,809 tons were added back, leaving total regional 

emissions from the MANE-VU region greater than the original Inter-RPO IPM-based estimate 

but consistent with state projections. The remaining 440,541 tons added back were allocated to 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

29 

VISTAS and MRPO based on the fraction of their contribution to the total SO2 emissions. The 

additional emissions correspond to an increase of 20.5 percent, with a total of 223,856 tons 

added to MRPO and 216,685 added to VISTAS. 

Table 8 shows the emissions difference between the results of two IPM runs and the modeling 

inventories used by three Regional Planning Organizations (RPOs). VISTAS used Base G2, 

MANE-VU used the March 2008 Modeling Inventory, and MRPO used IPM 3.0.. 

Table 8. Comparison of Regional SO2 Emissions Estimates. 

(1000 tons per year) 

 MANE-VU MRPO VISTAS TOTAL 

RPO 2.1.9 (VISTASII_PC_1f) (fossil only) 321 1,387 1,303 3,011 

Reductions made by 

VISTAS and MRPO (Base G2) 0 -136 -209 -344 

Net additional changes made 

by MANE-VU 66 24 222 311 

MANE-VU March 2008 Modeling 

Inventory (fossil only) 387 1,276 1,316 2,978 

MANE-VU minus RPO 2.1.9 

(negative numbers mean 

MANE-VU's modeling inventory 

was less than RPO 2.1.9) 66 -112 13 -33 

EPA 3.0 (fossil only) 421 1,328 1,458 3,207 

RPO 2.1.9 minus EPA 3.0 

(negative number means RPO 

2.1.9 was less than EPA 3.0) -100 59 -155 -196 

MANE-VU 3/08 minus EPA 3.0 

(negative numbers mean 

MANE-VU's modeling inventory 

was less than EPA 3.0) -34 -53 -142 -229 

The intent of the MANE-VU modelers’ final EGU emissions adjustments was to retain the same 

level of emissions as predicted by the RPO CAIR IPM run for the three regions together, but to 

modify the locations of the emissions to better reflect the states’ estimates and to achieve 

reductions at the 167 stacks identifie++d as important contributors to regional haze at MANEVU Class I areas. As shown in Table 8, above, the MANE-VU adjustments resulted in total 

emissions from the three regions being less than the SO2 emissions predicted by the RPO 2.1.9 

IPM run but greater than emissions in the G2 inventory used by VISTAS modelers. In both the 

MANE-VU and VISTAS regions, the MANE-VU Modeling Inventory is greater than the 

VISTAS/Inter-RPO IPM run and in MRPO it is smaller. Results from IPM 3.0 also are provided 

for comparison, and are uniformly greater than the MANE-VU Modeling Inventory for EGUs. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

30 

All future EGU emissions estimates involve uncertainty. MANE-VU believes its process of 

adding back emissions resulted in a reasonable, conservative estimate of the implementation of 

the MANE-VU request for a 90% reduction at key EGU facilities. 

5.6 State Results – Northeastern State Adjustments 

Table 9 presents State level emission results as modified by the Northeastern States per the 

methods noted in the above sections. This table summarizes the input data used in the MANEVU 2018 March 2008 Modeling run as documented in NESCAUM’s 2018 Visibility Projections

report dated March 2008. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

31 

Table 9. State Level 2018 Emission Summary; March 2008 MANE-VU EGU Modeling 

Inventory. (See next page for file names.) 

State RPO NOx SO2 VOC CO PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3

Connecticut MANE-VU 3,418 6,697 145 9,836 959 927 341

Delaware MANE-VU 12,341 10,941 117 1,183 2,950 2,438 76

District Of Columbia MANE-VU 103 83 5 154 104 99 12

Maine MANE-VU 1,827 6,806 53 4,057 296 279 139

Maryland MANE-VU 14,709 43,764 575 11,831 8,253 6,433 435

Massachusetts MANE-VU 18,157 45,941 484 13,860 3,917 3,233 1,059

New Hampshire MANE-VU 3,089 10,766 73 1,697 2,268 2,156 124

New Jersey MANE-VU 13,636 15,918 352 7,611 4,017 3,515 564

New York MANE-VU 24,376 74,587 758 22,242 11,031 9,343 1,471

Pennsylvania MANE-VU 82,881 170,992 1,919 41,446 31,580 23,756 1,790

Rhode Island MANE-VU 576 55 42 1,627 157 156 127

Vermont MANE-VU 105 35 3 117 26 25 9

MANE-VU Total 175,219 386,584 4,528 115,660 65,558 52,360 6,148

Alabama VISTAS 62,860 163,567 1,620 21,611 7,385 4,380 1,033

Florida VISTAS 58,341 167,685 1,903 42,946 9,355 6,330 2,665

Georgia VISTAS 69,308 90,408 1,805 35,584 18,217 11,319 1,676

Kentucky VISTAS 59,740 255,559 1,344 12,125 6,194 4,067 436

Mississippi VISTAS 10,455 18,241 1,055 11,822 7,007 6,853 545

North Carolina VISTAS 56,526 126,042 1,147 16,376 32,676 26,014 608

South Carolina VISTAS 50,068 105,436 860 13,078 28,110 24,454 578

Tennessee VISTAS 30,008 135,344 886 7,126 15,861 13,320 241

Virginia VISTAS 60,615 125,849 921 14,017 13,505 11,757 553

West Virginia VISTAS 51,177 127,609 1,382 11,896 6,344 3,643 177

VISTAS Total 509,098 1,315,740 12,922 186,579 144,653 112,137 8,512

Illinois MRPO 71,233 208,832 2,229 17,868 32,649 30,132 1,152

Indiana MRPO 95,376 403,473 2,105 19,416 35,081 27,835 1,274

Michigan MRPO 78,605 213,066 1,623 17,521 38,902 34,276 1,091

Ohio MRPO 83,129 353,293 2,254 23,832 42,753 33,322 1,772

Wisconsin MRPO 45,701 96,934 1,101 11,901 15,629 14,246 626

MRPO Total 374,044 1,275,598 9,311 90,539 165,015 139,812 5,915

Arkansas CENRAP 33,097 82,605 696 11,429 3,897 3,326 814

Iowa CENRAP 51,119 147,305 770 8,758 10,033 8,615 569

Kansas CENRAP 83,333 81,486 798 7,203 8,520 6,807 461

Louisiana CENRAP 30,432 74,263 660 11,043 3,966 3,590 919

Minnesota CENRAP 41,029 85,847 674 5,563 8,162 7,035 343

Missouri CENRAP 77,660 280,887 1,579 13,165 18,456 16,769 799

Nebraska CENRAP 50,781 73,629 450 3,590 2,296 1,914 217

Oklahoma CENRAP 76,048 113,680 1,008 28,182 5,561 4,840 1,355

Texas CENRAP 153,837 339,433 4,988 102,581 38,952 31,630 6,424

CENRAP Total 597,336 1,279,135 11,622 191,515 99,842 84,527 11,901

Arizona WRAP 59,774 55,941 724 17,806 2,811 634 630

California WRAP 17,537 1,528 2,558 31,173 1,219 1,059 0

Colorado WRAP 77,113 60,914 1,465 18,939 3,138 307 537

Idaho WRAP 2,236 1,683 50 3,283 335 87 0

Montana WRAP 44,733 31,303 565 11,818 1,796 247 13

Nevada WRAP 54,300 22,118 1,570 10,598 4,230 768 903

New Mexico WRAP 32,925 17,796 695 10,976 794 627 43

North Dakota WRAP 82,741 152,828 909 13,647 3,958 2,645 383

Oregon WRAP 15,742 15,096 474 5,753 1,288 323 219

South Dakota WRAP 17,681 13,522 118 689 247 217 52

Utah WRAP 76,136 41,394 597 17,150 4,637 2,000 1,350

Washington WRAP 16,884 7,011 249 4,008 1,474 1,027 12

Wyoming WRAP 104,142 96,745 1,147 18,871 10,445 7,411 404

WRAP Total 601,942 517,879 11,122 164,711 36,371 17,353 4,547

National Total 2,257,639 4,774,936 49,505 749,003 511,439 406,188 37,023

Annual Emissions (Tons)
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

32 

Files used in preparing Table 9 include for CENRAP and WRAP, the VISTAS Base G2 

Modeling file (egu_18_vistas_g2_20feb2007.txt.), and the following additional files: 

MANE-VU: 

EGU2018_MANEVUv3_nonSO2.ida 

EGU2018_MANEVU_SO2_non167plus.ida 

EGU2018_MANEVU_SO2_167plus.ida 

VISTAS: 

EGU2018_VISTASG2_SO2_non167plus_CAIR

addback.ida 

EGU2018_VISTASG2_SO2_167plus_CAIRadd

back.ida 

EGU2018_VISTASG2_nonSO2.ida 

MRPO: 

EGU2018_MWRPO_SO2_167plus_CAIRaddback.

ida 

EGU2018_MWRPO_SO2_non167p_non65_CAIR

addback.ida 

EGU2018_MWRPO_SO2_65_CAIRaddback.ida 

EGU2018_MWRPO_nonSO2.ida 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

33 

6 EGU PREPARATION TIMELINE 

The following section provides a chronological review of the events and milestones that occurred 

during the preparation of EGU emission forecasts in support of regional haze SIP preparation. 

2004 

• VISTAS/MRPO sponsor first IPM 2.1.6 runs for 2018 (Phase I) 

• Phase I (VISTAS_CAIR_2) results released 

2005 

• RPOs move to IPM 2.1.9 (Phase II) 

• Revisions to NEEDS input file and global parameters submitted by RPOs for revised runs 

• Phase II (VISTAS_II_PC_1f) results released 

• IPM parsed to NIF and NIF to SMOKE IDA format conversion occurs 

• Initial RPO adjustments and modifications of IPM results 

• RPOs share IPM 2.1.9 inputs and configuration from Phase II with EPA 

• EPA releases IPM 2.1.9 results of CAIR/CAMR modeling 

2006 

• Additional RPO control and modeling file adjustments to Phase II runs 

• RPOs simulate 2018 forecast year to support regional haze SIP submittals 

• RPOs work with EPA to configure NEEDS 3.0 for next round of EPA modeling 

• EPA releases IPM 2006 revised projections 

• RPOs identify potential control measures and estimate benefits for meeting reasonable progress 

goals 

• Additional RPO control and modeling file adjustments to Phase II runs 

2007 

• RPOs analyze cost and other factors associated with potential control measures 

• RPOs coordinate with EPA on inputs and runs of IPM 3.0 

• EPA releases IPM 3.0 results of revised CAIR/CAMR/CAVR modeling 

• Interstate and inter-regional consultation regarding potential control measures 

• MANE-VU states agree to pursue several control measures 

• RPOs begin regional modeling to assess visibility impacts of controls 

2008 

• RPOs model to determine progress goals for regional haze SIP 

• States finalize regional haze SIPs 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

34 

7 REFERENCES 

Alpine Geophysics, LLC, 2005a. EGU Emission Factors and Emission Factor Assignment, 

technical memorandum prepared for VISTAS EGU Special Interest Workgroup, 2005.

Alpine Geophysics, LLC, 2005b. Emission Factor/Rate Development for IPM Post-Processing, 

technical memorandum prepared for VISTAS EGU Special Interest Workgroup.

Alpine Geophysics, LLC, 2006. Future Year Emissions Inventories, Draft Work Assignment #1, 

Technical Memorandum - Task 1, prepared for MARAMA, 2006. 

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., 2004. Electricity Generating Unit (EGU) Growth Modeling 

Method Task 2 Evaluation – Final Report, prepared for Lake Michigan Air Directors 

Consortium, 2004. 

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., 2005. LADCO IPM Model Parsed File Post-Processing 

Methodology and File Preparation (January 2005) – Technical Memorandum, prepared for Lake 

Michigan Air Directors Consortium, 2005. 

ENVIRON, 2007. Technical Support Document for CENRAP Emissions and Air Quality 

Modeling to Support Regional Haze State Implementation Plans, prepared for Central Regional 

Air Planning Association. 

EPA, 2004. Analysis in Support of the Clean Air Interstate Rule Using the Integrated Planning 

Model, Technical Support Document for the Final Clean Air Interstate Rule, 2004. 

EPA, 2005a. Modeling of Control Costs, Emissions, and Control Retrofits for Cost Effectiveness 

and Feasibility Analyses, Technical Support Document for the Final Clean Air Interstate Rule, 

2005. 

EPA, 2005b. Standalone Documentation for EPA Base Case 2004 (V.2.1.9) Using the Integrated 

Planning Model, EPA 430-R-05-011. Available at http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/epaipm/past-modeling.html#version2004. 

ERG, 2006. WRAP Point and Area Source Emissions Projections for the 2018 Base Case 

Inventory, Version 1, prepared for Emission Inventory Workgroup, 2006. 

Houyoux, M.; Vukovich, J.; Brandmeyer, J., 2000. Sparse Matrix Operator Kernal Emissions 

Modeling System (SMOKE) User Manual, Version 1.1.2 Draft, MCNC-North Carolina 

Supercomuting Center Environmental Programs. 

ICF Resources, LLC., 2005. Future Year Electricity Generating Sector Emission Inventory 

Development Using the Integrated Planning Model (IPM®) in Support of Fine Particulate Mass 

and Visibility Modeling in the VISTAS and Midwest RPO Regions, prepared for VISTAS, 2005. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

35 

ICF Resources, LLC., 2007. Comparison of CAIR and CAIR Plus Proposal using the 

Integrated Planning Model (IPM®), prepared for MARAMA. 

Koerber, 2007. Personal and electronic communication from Mark Janssen to Julie McDill, 

MARAMA and Andy Bodnarik, New Hampshire DEP. 

MACTEC, 2006. Development of Emission Projections for 2009, 2012, and 2018 for NonEGU 

Point, Area, and Nonroad Sources in the MANE-VU Region, prepared for MARAMA. 

MACTEC, 2007. Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018, Emission 

Inventories for VISTAS, prepared for VISTAS, 2007. 

MRPO, 2006. Personal and electronic communication from Mark Janssen to Gregory Stella, 

Alpine Geophysics, LLC., 2006. 

NESCAUM, 2006a. Contributions to Regional Haze in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic U.S., 

Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, Boston, MA, 2006a. 

NESCAUM, 2006b. The Nature of the Fine Particle and Regional Haze Air Quality Problems in 

the MANE-VU Region: A Conceptual Description, Available at: 

http://www.nescaum.org/documents/2006-1102-pm-conceptual-model.pdf/, Northeast States for 

Coordinated Air Use Management, Boston, MA, 2006b. 

NESCAUM, 2008a. MANE-VU Modeling for Reasonable Progress Goals Model performance 

evaluation, pollution apportionment, and control measure benefits, prepared for MANE-VU, 

2008a. 

NESCAUM, 2008b. 2018 Visibility Projections, prepared for MANE-VU. 

VISTAS, 2007. Electronic communication from Doris McLeod 11/7/2007. 

Janssen, 2008. Personal communication from Mark Janssen 3/28/2008. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

36 

Appendix A 

TOP ELECTRIC GENERATING EMISSION POINTS CONTRIBUTING TO 

VISIBILITY IMPAIRMENT IN MANE-VU IN 2002 

For each of three MANE-VU Class I Areas the 100 Electric Generating Unit (EGU) stacks with 

the most significant impact on visibility impairment were identified by Calpuff modeling 

conducted by two modeling centers.1

 Many of these stacks have a regional impact and therefore 

significantly impact more than one Class I Area. When the “Top Impacting” stacks are 

aggregated into a single group there are 167 individual “Top Impacting” stacks identified. The 

map on the following page indicates the location of the 167 stacks, and the table following the 

map provides identifying information, emissions used in the Calpuff modeling, and predicted 

impacts. The following information may be found in the listed columns of the following table: 

1. Row Number (1 through 167) 

2. CEMS Unit ID: an arbitrary number identifying the CEMS unit 

3. ORIS ID: a standard identification number associated with each unit 

4. Acadia MM5: The rank of this source based on its predicted sulfate ion annual 

impact on Acadia in 2002 using meteorological data from the MM5 model. (A blank 

in columns 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 indicates this source was not among the top 100 for this 

Class I area as predicted by the indicated model.) 

5. Acadia VTDEC: The rank of this source in terms of its predicted sulfate ion annual 

impact on Acadia in 2002 using National Weather Service data. 

6. Brig MM5: The rank of this source in terms of its predicted sulfate ion annual impact 

on Brigantine in 2002 using meteorological data from the MM5 model. 

7. Brig VTDEC: The rank of this source in terms of its predicted sulfate ion annual 

impact on Brigantine in 2002 using National Weather Service data. 

8. Lye MM5: The rank of this source in terms of its predicted sulfate ion annual impact 

on Lye Brook in 2002 using meteorological data from the MM5 model. 

9. Lye VTDEC: The rank of this source in terms of its predicted sulfate ion annual 

impact on Lye Brook in 2002 using National Weather Service data. 

10. MM5 2002 SO2 Tons per Year: Emissions calculated from CEMS data and used by 

modelers who used the MM5 generated meteorological data 

11. VTDEC 2002 SO2 Tons per Year: Emissions calculated from CEMS data and used 

by modelers who used the national weather service generated meteorological data 

12. Plant Number (1 through 105): The 167 stacks are located at 105 plants. 

13. Plant Name—table is in alphabetical order by plant within each state 

14. Plant Type: coal fired or oil/gas fired electric generating units 

15. State Name—table is in alphabetical order by state 

16. State Code 

 

1

 For more information and detailed modeling results, see Appendix D: Source Dispersion Model Methods, in 

NESCAUM 2006a. 
DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

37 

Figure A-1. Top 167 US Electric Generating Facility Stacks Affecting MANE-VU Class I 

Areas in 2002. 
DRAFT—DO NOT 

38 

Row number 

CEMS Unit 

ORIS ID 

Acadia MM5 

Acadia VTDEC 

Brig MM5 

Brig VTDEC 

Lye MM5 

Lye VTDEC 

MM5 2002 S02 TPY 

VTDEC 2002 SO2 

TPY 

Plant Name 

Plant Type 

1 D005935 593 90 54 2,138 2,136 1 EDGE MOOR O/G Steam 2 D005941 594 95 3,742 2 INDIAN RIVER Coal Steam 3 D005942 594 74 3,760 2 INDIAN RIVER Coal Steam 4 D005943 594 84 44 4,686 4,682 2 INDIAN RIVER Coal Steam 5 D005944 594 69 21 7,390 7,384 2 INDIAN RIVER Coal Steam 6 D007031LR 703 79 86 75 38,520 38,486 3 BOWEN Coal Steam 7 D007032LR 703 72 89 61 68 37,289 37,256 3 BOWEN Coal Steam 8 D007033LR 703 71 99 74 64 63 94 43,067 43,029 3 BOWEN Coal Steam 9 D007034LR 703 69 95 86 58 60 89 41,010 40,974 3 BOWEN Coal Steam 

10 D00709C02 709 84 75 89 71 47,591 47,549 4 HARLLEE BRANCH Coal Steam 11 D00861C01 861 28 96 65 46 62 42,355 42,318 5 COFFEEN Coal Steam 12 D010011 1001 53 28,876 28,851 6 CAYUGA Coal Steam 13 D010012 1001 95 46 68 26,016 25,992 6 CAYUGA Coal Steam 14 D00983C01 983 52 19,922 7 CLIFTY CREEK Coal Steam 15 D00983C02 983 54 18,131 7 CLIFTY CREEK Coal Steam 16 D0099070 990 55 10

0 

70 37 29,801 29,774 8 ELMER W STOUT O/G Steam 

17 D06113C03 6113 30 48 14 43 22 41 71,182 71,119 9 GIBSON Coal Steam 18 D06113C04 6113 44 70 97 83 73 83 27,848 27,823 9 GIBSON Coal Steam 19 D01008C01 1008 73 10

0 

47 24,109 24,087 10 R GALLAGHER Coal Steam 

20 D01008C02 1008 98 55 23,849 23,828 10 R GALLAGHER Coal Steam 21 D06166C02 6166 62 44 30 81 33 57 51,708 51,663 11 ROCKPORT Coal Steam 22 D00988C03 988 77 15,946 12 TANNERS CREEK Coal Steam 23 D00988U4 988 14 29 52 34 7 19 45,062 45,022 12 TANNERS CREEK Coal Steam 24 D01010C05 1010 43 32 12 28 31 17 60,747 60,693 13 WABASH RIVER Coal Steam 25 D067054 6705 34 60 34 44 73 40,118 40,082 14 WARRICK Coal Steam 26 D06705C02 6705 92 75 96 27,895 14 WARRICK Coal Steam 27 D01353C02 1353 38 30 15 26 85 29 41,545 41,508 15 BIG SANDY Coal Steam 
DRAFT—DO NOT 

39 

Row number 

CEMS Unit 

ORIS ID 

Acadia MM5 

Acadia VTDEC 

Brig MM5 

Brig VTDEC 

Lye MM5 

Lye VTDEC 

MM5 2002 S02 TPY 

VTDEC 2002 SO2 

TPY 

Plant Name 

Plant Type 

28 D01384CS1 1384 22 58 21,837 21,817 16 COOPER Coal Steam 29 D01355C03 1355 21 51 99 68 52 38,104 38,070 17 E W BROWN Coal Steam 30 D060182 6018 83 39 12,083 18 EAST BEND Coal Steam 31 D01356C02 1356 93 71 88 50 59 25,646 25,623 19 GHENT Coal Steam 32 D060411 6041 61 18,375 20 H L SPURLOCK Coal Steam 33 D060412 6041 53 91 98 20,491 20,473 20 H L SPURLOCK Coal Steam 34 D013644 1364 81 7,185 21 MILL CREEK Coal Steam 35 D013782 1378 87 20,245 22 PARADISE Coal Steam 36 D013783 1378 76 10

0 

11 84 55 42 46,701 46,660 22 PARADISE Coal Steam 

37 D015074 1507 78 1,170 23 WILLIAM F WYMAN O/G Steam 38 D006021 602 90 38 10

0 

20,014 19,996 24 BRANDON SHORES Coal Steam 

39 D006022 602 99 29 99 19,280 19,263 24 BRANDON SHORES Coal Steam 40 D015521 1552 63 17,782 17,767 25 C P CRANE Coal Steam 41 D015522 1552 68 14,274 14,262 25 C P CRANE Coal Steam 42 D01571CE2 1571 42 47 1 4 20 28 48,566 48,522 26 CHALK POINT Coal Steam 43 D01572C23 1572 73 79 47 45 69 32 32,188 32,159 27 DICKERSON Coal Steam 44 D015543 1554 77 10,084 10,075 28 HERBERT A WAGNER O/G Steam 45 D015731 1573 67 50 16 12 56 38 36,823 36,790 29 MORGANTOWN Coal Steam 46 D015732 1573 59 53 10 13 51 39 30,788 30,761 29 MORGANTOWN Coal Steam 47 D016191 1619 37 80 9,252 9,244 30 BRAYTON POINT Coal Steam 48 D016192 1619 35 66 8,889 8,881 30 BRAYTON POINT Coal Steam 49 D016193 1619 4 14 65 56 79 19,325 19,308 30 BRAYTON POINT Coal Steam 50 D015991 1599 5 36 65 13,014 13,002 31 CANAL O/G Steam 51 D015992 1599 7 27 74 8,980 8,971 31 CANAL O/G Steam 52 D016061 1606 48 5,249 32 MOUNT TOM Coal Steam 53 D016261 1626 85 3,430 33 SALEM HARBOR Coal Steam 54 D016263 1626 91 78 4,971 4,966 33 SALEM HARBOR Coal Steam 
DRAFT—DO NOT 

40 

Row number 

CEMS Unit 

ORIS ID 

Acadia MM5 

Acadia VTDEC 

Brig MM5 

Brig VTDEC 

Lye MM5 

Lye VTDEC 

MM5 2002 S02 TPY 

VTDEC 2002 SO2 

TPY 

Plant Name 

Plant Type 

55 D016264 1626 32 25 2,880 2,878 33 SALEM HARBOR O/G Steam 56 D016138 1613 94 4,376 34 SOMERSET Coal Steam 57 D01702C09 1702 96 4,565 35 DAN E KARN Coal Steam 58 D01733C12 1733 49 24 80 80 45 22 46,081 46,040 36 MONROE Coal Steam 59 D01733C34 1733 27 26 76 26 27 39,362 39,327 36 MONROE Coal Steam 60 D017437 1743 91 15,805 37 ST CLAIR Coal Steam 61 D017459A 1745 76 61 18,341 18,324 38 TRENTON CHANNEL Coal Steam 62 D023641 2364 2 57 9,356 9,348 39 MERRIMACK Coal Steam 63 D023642 2364 1 17 99 28 87 19,453 19,435 39 MERRIMACK Coal Steam 64 D080021 8002 45 74 5,033 5,028 40 NEWINGTON O/G Steam 65 D023781 2378 81 2 15 9,747 9,738 41 B L ENGLAND Coal Steam 66 D024032 2403 63 97 25 50 40 44 18,785 18,768 42 HUDSON O/G Steam 67 D024081 2408 95 8,076 43 MERCER Coal Steam 68 D024082 2408 60 5,675 43 MERCER Coal Steam 69 D02549C01 2549 64 41 42 72 25,343 25,320 44 C R HUNTLEY Coal Steam 70 D02549C02 2549 99 12,317 44 C R HUNTLEY Coal Steam 71 D024804 2480 71 7,720 45 DANSKAMMER O/G Steam 72 D02554C03 2554 33 51 62 27 51 30,151 30,125 46 DUNKIRK Coal Steam 73 D02526C03 2526 78 14,929 47 WESTOVER Coal Steam 74 D025276 2527 80 12,650 48 GREENIDGE Coal Steam 75 D025163 2516 96 7,359 49 NORTHPORT O/G Steam 76 D025945 2594 76 1,747 50 OSWEGO O/G Steam 77 D02642CS2 2642 91 14,086 51 ROCHESTER 7 Coal Steam 78 D080061 8006 93 3,817 52 ROSETON O/G Steam 79 D080062 8006 88 2,840 52 ROSETON O/G Steam 80 D080421 8042 13 12 18 5 10 34 57,820 57,769 53 BELEWS CREEK Coal Steam 81 D080422 8042 23 15 32 10 15 49 45,296 45,256 53 BELEWS CREEK Coal Steam 82 D027215 2721 98 45 87 39 97 85 19,145 19,128 54 CLIFFSIDE Coal Steam 83 D027133 2713 61 14,460 55 L V SUTTON Coal Steam 
DRAFT—DO NOT 

41 

Row number 

CEMS Unit 

ORIS ID 

Acadia MM5 

Acadia VTDEC 

Brig MM5 

Brig VTDEC 

Lye MM5 

Lye VTDEC 

MM5 2002 S02 TPY 

VTDEC 2002 SO2 

TPY 

Plant Name 

Plant Type 

84 D027093 2709 97 9,390 56 LEE Coal Steam 85 D027273 2727 10

0 

40 48 75 84 26,329 26,305 57 MARSHALL Coal Steam 

86 D027274 2727 89 39 83 51 66 82 27,308 27,284 57 MARSHALL Coal Steam 87 D06250C05 6250 60 59 35 37 27,395 27,371 58 MAYO Coal Steam 88 D027121 2712 59 12,031 12,020 59 ROXBORO Coal Steam 89 D027122 2712 82 41 54 23 94 29,337 29,310 59 ROXBORO Coal Steam 90 D02712C03 2712 56 37 57 24 21 78 30,776 30,749 59 ROXBORO Coal Steam 91 D02712C04 2712 88 72 47 47 22,962 22,941 59 ROXBORO Coal Steam 92 D0283612 2836 55 20 48 89 29 35 41,432 41,395 60 AVON LAKE Coal Steam 93 D028281 2828 29 9 31 30 24 8 37,307 37,274 61 CARDINAL Coal Steam 94 D028282 2828 56 20,598 20,580 61 CARDINAL Coal Steam 95 D028283 2828 80 15,372 61 CARDINAL Coal Steam 96 D028404 2840 3 1 6 2 2 3 87,801 87,724 62 CONESVILLE Coal Steam 97 D02840C02 2840 84 73 81 63 22,791 22,771 62 CONESVILLE Coal Steam 98 D028375 2837 86 56 35 70 35,970 35,938 63 EASTLAKE Coal Steam 99 D081021 8102 23 71 59 95 18,207 18,191 64 GEN J M GAVIN Coal Steam 

100 D081022 8102 78 12,333 12,322 64 GEN J M GAVIN Coal Steam 101 D028501 2850 36 67 39 53 45 30,798 30,771 65 J M STUART Coal Steam 102 D028502 2850 24 65 40 49 98 46 28,698 28,673 65 J M STUART Coal Steam 103 D028503 2850 26 72 62 27,968 27,944 65 J M STUART Coal Steam 104 D028504 2850 20 77 45 52 88 54 27,343 27,319 65 J M STUART Coal Steam 105 D060312 6031 67 77 90 19,517 19,500 66 KILLEN STATION Coal Steam 106 D02876C01 2876 40 7 3 9 30 10 72,593 72,529 67 KYGER CREEK Coal Steam 107 D028327 2832 65 28 59 22 48 20 46,991 46,950 68 MIAMI FORT Coal Steam 108 D02832C06 2832 60 43 64 23,694 23,673 68 MIAMI FORT Coal Steam 109 D028725 2872 74 92 78 90 36 30,079 30,052 69 MUSKINGUM RIVER Coal Steam 110 D02872C04 2872 6 19 13 6 19 15 83,134 83,060 69 MUSKINGUM RIVER Coal Steam 111 D02864C01 2864 70 56 61 63 49 24 35,193 35,162 70 R E BURGER Coal Steam 
DRAFT—DO NOT 

42 

Row number 

CEMS Unit 

ORIS ID 

Acadia MM5 

Acadia VTDEC 

Brig MM5 

Brig VTDEC 

Lye MM5 

Lye VTDEC 

MM5 2002 S02 TPY 

VTDEC 2002 SO2 

TPY 

Plant Name 

Plant Type 

112 D07253C01 7253 89 58 57 33 30,977 30,949 71 RICHARD GORSUCH 113 D028665 2866 82 53 19,796 19,779 72 W H SAMMIS Coal Steam 114 D028667 2866 57 16 42 41 41 16 33,601 33,572 72 W H SAMMIS Coal Steam 115 D02866C01 2866 97 54 93 96 92 30 24,649 24,627 72 W H SAMMIS Coal Steam 116 D02866C02 2866 69 92 50 26,022 25,999 72 W H SAMMIS Coal Steam 117 D02866M6A 2866 85 58 19,564 19,546 72 W H SAMMIS Coal Steam 118 D060191 6019 93 72 60 21,496 73 W H ZIMMER Coal Steam 119 D028306 2830 46 38 70 40 12 69 30,466 30,439 74 WALTER C BECKJORD Coal Steam 120 D031782 3178 77 63 81 16,484 16,469 75 ARMSTRONG Coal Steam 121 D031403 3140 31 34 9 46 18 18 38,801 38,767 76 BRUNNER ISLAND Coal Steam 122 D03140C12 3140 52 46 49 69 25 23 29,736 29,709 76 BRUNNER ISLAND Coal Steam 123 D082261 8226 25 21 33 42 36 9 40,268 40,232 77 CHESWICK Coal Steam 124 D03179C01 3179 16 10 5 8 5 4 79,635 79,565 78 HATFIELD'S FERRY Coal Steam 125 D031221 3122 11 6 26 38 17 14 45,754 45,714 79 HOMER CITY Coal Steam 126 D031222 3122 9 4 37 92 13 11 55,216 55,167 79 HOMER CITY Coal Steam 127 D031361 3136 8 2 4 14 6 1 87,434 87,357 80 KEYSTONE Coal Steam 128 D031362 3136 18 3 8 19 8 2 62,847 62,791 80 KEYSTONE Coal Steam 129 D03148C12 3148 71 84 17,214 81 MARTINS CREEK Coal Steam 130 D031491 3149 19 8 35 7 1 6 60,242 60,188 82 MONTOUR Coal Steam 131 D031492 3149 15 5 21 20 3 5 50,276 50,232 82 MONTOUR Coal Steam 132 D031131 3113 82 9,674 83 PORTLAND Coal Steam 133 D031132 3113 36 93 14,294 83 PORTLAND Coal Steam 134 D03131CS1 3131 54 31 79 32 65 22,344 22,324 84 SHAWVILLE Coal Steam 135 D033193 3319 10

0 

 11,045 85 JEFFERIES O/G Steam 

136 D033194 3319 90 87 11,838 85 JEFFERIES O/G Steam 137 D03297WT1 3297 68 61 17,671 86 WATEREE Coal Steam 138 D03297WT2 3297 83 73 17,199 86 WATEREE Coal Steam 139 D03298WL1 3298 35 94 37 25,170 25,148 87 WILLIAMS Coal Steam 
DRAFT—DO NOT 

43 

Row number 

CEMS Unit 

ORIS ID 

Acadia MM5 

Acadia VTDEC 

Brig MM5 

Brig VTDEC 

Lye MM5 

Lye VTDEC 

MM5 2002 S02 TPY 

VTDEC 2002 SO2 

TPY 

Plant Name 

Plant Type 

140 D062491 6249 58 82 17,920 88 WINYAH Coal Steam 141 D03403C34 3403 85 20,314 89 GALLATIN Coal Steam 142 D03405C34 3405 39 19,368 90 JOHN SEVIER Coal Steam 143 D03406C10 3406 10 11 27 33 4 43 104,523 104,431 91 JOHNSONVILLE Coal Steam 144 D03407C15 3407 64 87 66 67 76 37,308 37,274 92 KINGSTON Coal Steam 145 D03407C69 3407 48 98 91 82 91 38,645 38,611 92 KINGSTON Coal Steam 146 D038033 3803 55 9,493 93 CHESAPEAKE Coal Steam 147 D038034 3803 94 16 10,806 93 CHESAPEAKE Coal Steam 148 D037974 3797 90 9,293 94 CHESTERFIELD Coal Steam 149 D037975 3797 88 44 27 86 19,620 19,602 94 CHESTERFIELD Coal Steam 150 D037976 3797 66 18 7 3 34 66 40,570 40,534 94 CHESTERFIELD Coal Steam 151 D03775C02 3775 47 16,674 95 CLINCH RIVER Coal Steam 152 D038093 3809 52 64 29 10,477 10,468 96 YORKTOWN Coal Steam 153 D03809CS0 3809 96 43 19 17 62 21,219 21,201 96 YORKTOWN Coal Steam 154 D039423 3942 79 10,126 97 ALBRIGHT Coal Steam 155 D039431 3943 51 23 20 32 16 13 42,385 42,348 97 FORT MARTIN Coal Steam 156 D039432 3943 50 22 22 31 14 12 45,850 45,809 97 FORT MARTIN Coal Steam 157 D039353 3935 41 33 28 11 64 26 42,212 42,174 98 JOHN E AMOS Coal Steam 158 D03935C02 3935 17 42 43 1 11 21 63,066 63,010 98 JOHN E AMOS Coal Steam 159 D03947C03 3947 86 62 55 57 25 38,575 38,541 99 KAMMER Coal Steam 160 D03936C02 3936 98 15,480 15,467 100 KANAWHA RIVER Coal Steam 161 D03948C02 3948 58 13 17 36 9 7 55,405 55,356 101 MITCHELL Coal Steam 162 D062641 6264 75 49 50 18 77 40 42,757 42,719 102 MOUNTAINEER Coal Steam 163 D03954CS0 3954 68 24 25 23 67 20,130 20,112 103 MT STORM Coal Steam 164 D0393851 3938 79 97 12,948 12,936 104 PHILIP SPORN Coal Steam 165 D03938C04 3938 94 26,451 26,427 104 PHILIP SPORN Coal Steam 166 D060041 6004 66 83 31 21,581 21,562 105 PLEASANTS Coal Steam 167 D060042 6004 88 92 20,550 20,532 105 PLEASANTS Coal Steam 
Final Report

Future Year Electricity Generating Sector Emission Inventory Development Using the 

Integrated Planning Model (IPM®) in Support of Fine Particulate Mass and Visibility 

Modeling in the VISTAS and Midwest RPO Regions

Prepared for

Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS)

Prepared by

ICF Resources, L.L.C.

9300 Lee Highway

Fairfax, VA 22031

April 2005
Table of Contents

Table of Contents....................................................................................................................... 2

A. Overview ............................................................................................................................... 3

B. Modeling Assumptions........................................................................................................... 3

C. Analysis Results .................................................................................................................... 5

1. Emissions........................................................................................................................... 5

2. Projected Costs.................................................................................................................. 5

3. Projected Control Technology Retrofits .............................................................................. 6

4. Projected Generation Mix................................................................................................... 6

5. Projected Coal Production for the Electric Power Sector.................................................... 6

6. Projected Retail Electricity Prices....................................................................................... 7

7. Projected Fuel Price Impacts.............................................................................................. 7

D. Limitations of Analysis ........................................................................................................... 8

E. Appendix ............................................................................................................................... 9

1. Changes made to the NEEDS NODA Database for the VISTAS Analysis ...................... 9

Table A1 Changes made to NOx Post Combustion Control Installations on Existing Units 10

Table A2 Changes made to NOx Emission Rates (lbs/MMBtu)..........................................11

Table A3 Changes made to SO2 Scrubber Installations on Existing Units .........................15

Table A4 Changes made to SO2 Emission Rate Limits (lbs/MMBtu)..................................16

Table A5 Changes made to Particulate Matter (PM) Control Installations on Existing Units

..........................................................................................................................................18

Table A6 Changes made to Summer Net Dependable Capacity (MW)..............................19

Table A7 Changes made to Heat Rate (Btu/kWh) .............................................................20

Table A8 Changes made to Unit ID ...................................................................................21

Table A9 Duke and Progress Energy SO2 Control Plan for North Carolina Clean 

Smokestacks Rule.............................................................................................................22

Table A10 Duke and Progress Energy NOx Control Plan for North Carolina Clean 

Smokestacks Rule.............................................................................................................23

2. Emission Results...............................................................................................................24

Table A11 State Level Base Case NOx Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)...............25

Table A12 State Level Base Case SO2 Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)...............27

Table A13 State Level CAIR Case NOx Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)...............29

Table A14 State Level CAIR Case SO2 Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)...............31

3. Generation Results ...........................................................................................................33

Table A15 State Level Base Case Generation by Season (GWh) .....................................34

Table A16 State Level CAIR Case Generation by Season (GWh).....................................36

4. Cost Results......................................................................................................................38

Table A17 FOM Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)..............................................39

Table A18 VOM Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)..............................................40

Table A19 Fuel Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)...............................................41

Table A20 Capital Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)...........................................42
A. Overview

In order to model regional haze, visibility and other air quality issues, Visibility Improvement 

State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS) awarded a contract to ICF Resources, 

L.L.C. (ICF) in August 2004, seeking ICF’s services to generate future year emission inventory 

for the electric generating sector of the contiguous United States using the Integrated Planning 

Model (IPM®

IPM is a dynamic linear optimization model that can be used to examine air pollution control 

policies for various pollutants throughout the contiguous U.S. for the entire electric power 

system. The dynamic nature of IPM enables the projection of the behavior of the power system 

over a specified future period. The optimization logic determines the least-cost means of 

meeting electric generation and capacity requirements while complying with specified 

constraints including air pollution regulations, transmission bottlenecks, and plant-specific 

operational constraints. The versatility of IPM allows users to specify which constraints to 

exercise and populate IPM with their own datasets. 

). 

This report summarizes the analysis that ICF has performed in generating the future year 

electricity generating sector emission inventory by using IPM (hereafter, the analysis is referred 

to as the VISTAS analysis). The model assumptions and data used in this analysis are 

presented in Section B and the Appendix. The results are presented in Section C and the 

analysis limitations are presented in Section D. 

Since the modeling is based on the EPA’s prior analyses for which detailed public 

documentation is available, we have summarized only the incremental changes that were 

proposed by VISTAS and MRPO as part of this analysis. For detailed documentation on EPA’s 

prior modeling using IPM, please visit www.epa.gov/airmarkets/epa-ipm. 

B. Modeling Assumptions 

The VISTAS analysis is based on the USEPA Modeling Applications Using IPM (V.2.1.6). As 

per the analytical needs of VISTAS and MRPO, the following changes were made to the 

underlying assumptions in the US EPA Base Case (V2.1.6) in this analysis:

i) The underlying database in the VISTAS analysis is US EPA’s National Electric Energy Data 

System (NEEDS1

) NODA Database, with changes based upon the comments and technical 

directions from VISTAS and MRPO’s stakeholders. The changes focused on existing 

installations of NOx, SO2 and particulate matter (PM) controls, NOx emission rates, SO2

 1 The NEEDS database contains the existing and planned/committed unit data in EPA modeling 

applications of IPM. NEEDS includes basic geographic, operating, air emissions, and other data 

on these generating units. For data sources underlying NEEDS and description of fields as well 

as the documentation on EPA Modeling Applications Using IPM (V.2.1.6), please visit website 

http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/epa-ipm/index.html

emission limits, capacity of existing units, heat rate and unit identifications of selected units in 

the VISTAS and MRPO regions. These changes are summarized in detail in Appendix 1.
ii) The analysis covers the period between 2007 and 2030. To make the model size and run 

time tractable, IPM is run for a number of selected years within the study horizon known as run 

years. Each run year represents several calendar years in the study horizon, and all calendar 

years within the study horizon are mapped to their representative run years. Although results 

are only reported for the run years, IPM takes into account all years in the study horizon while 

developing the projections. Table 1 summarizes the mapping between the run years and the 

calendar years. Model results are available for all run years; the last run year (2026) results are,

however, not recommended to be used because of end-year effects.

Table 1: IPM Run Years 

Run Year Calendar Years

2007 2007-2007

2009 2008-2009

2010 2010-2012

2015 2013-2017

2018 2018-2018

2020 2019-2022

2026 2023-2030

iii) The Duke Power and Progress Energy SO2 and NOx

iv) The CAIR rule implemented as part of this analysis is broadly consistent with the 

Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 51, et al. Supplemental Proposal for the Rule to 

Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone (Clean Air Interstate Rule), 

proposed on June 10, 2004. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, 

Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, 

Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, 

Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin are the 

states affected by the CAIR SO

control technology investment 

strategies for complying with North Carolina’s Clean Smokestacks Rule were explicitly 

hardwired in the analysis.

2 and the CAIR annual NOx policies starting 2010. Connecticut 

is affected by an ozone season NOx policy. The CAIR plants affected by the annual NOx policy 

are capped at 1.6 million tons starting 2010 and 1.33 million tons starting 2015. The power 

plants affected by the CAIR SO2 policy have to surrender 2 Title IV SO2 allowances for every 

ton of SO2 emitted starting 2010 and 3 Title IV SO2 allowances for every ton of SO2 emitted 

starting 2015.
C. Analysis Results

ICF ran IPM under two future scenarios – Base Case and CAIR Case. The Base Case 

represents the current operation of the power system under currently known laws and 

regulations, including those that come into force in the study horizon. The CAIR Case is the 

Base Case with the proposed CAIR rule superimposed. The run results were parsed at the unit 

level for the 2009 and 2018 run years. Appendix 2 summarizes the SO2 and NOx

1. Emissions

emission 

results on a state level. The following paragraphs discuss the results from the two runs.

Table 2 presents the emissions from the Base Case and the CAIR Case in the VISTAS analysis. 

Table 2: SO2 and NOx Emissions from the Electric Power Sector (Million Tons)

Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

CAIR Affected Region

SO2 9.1 8.2 5.3 4.1

NOx

* 2.9 3.0 2.8 1.4

VISTAS States 

SO2 3.44 2.96 2.28 1.42

NOx 1.09 1.09 1.07 0.44

Midwest RPO States

SO2 3.05 2.61 1.51 1.33

NOx 0.83 0.88 0.83 0.34

*Note: Excludes Connecticut

In the CAIR region, compared with the Base Case, SO2 emissions would be reduced by 3.8 

million tons in 2009 and by 4.1 million tons in 2018. The NOx

Total projected state-level emissions for SO

emissions would be cut by 1.6 

million tons annually in 2018, compared with the Base Case.

2 and NOx

2. Projected Costs

for both the Base Case and the CAIR 

Case are included in Tables A11, A12, A13, and A14 in the Appendix.

For the proposed CAIR region, the analysis projects the annualized incremental cost for the US 

to be $2.1 billion in 2009 and $3.6 billion in 2018. This represents a 3.3% increase in production 

cost in 2009 and a 4.6% increase in 2018 over the base case. The production cost as projected 

by IPM includes the capital costs of new investment decisions, fuel costs and the operation and 

maintenance costs of power plants. The marginal costs of emission reductions (allowance 

prices) in the CAIR case are shown in Table 3. 
Table 3: Marginal Costs of Emission Reductions in CAIR Case (1999 $)

2009 2018

Marginal Cost ($/ton)

SO2 700 1,100

NOx 1,500 1,700

3. Projected Control Technology Retrofits

In the VISTAS analysis, the proposed CAIR policy requires the installation of an additional 67 

GW of SO2 scrubbers and an additional 35 GW of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) on 

existing coal capacity by 2018 (see Table 4). The pool of existing SCR’s that are used during 

the ozone season in the NOx

Table 4: Pollution Control Installations by Technology in 2018 (GW)

SIP call region in the Base Case are allowed to operate yearround in the CAIR Case.

Technology

Base Case

(Cumulative)

CAIR Case 

(Cumulative)

Scrubber 19 86

SCR 33 67

4. Projected Generation Mix 

Table 5 shows the generation mix under the proposed CAIR policy. Coal-fired generation and 

natural gas-fired generation are projected to remain relatively unchanged due to the phased-in 

nature of the proposed CAIR.

Relative to the Base Case, in 2009, 2.7 GW of coal-fired capacity is projected to be uneconomic 

to maintain (approximately 1%) and 90 MW of coal-fired capacity is projected to repower to 

natural gas in the CAIR Case. 

Table 5: National Generation Mix (BkWh’s)

Generating Fuel 

Use

2009 2018

Base Case CAIR Case Base Case CAIR Case

Coal 2,115 2,072 2,219 2,154

Oil/Natural Gas 821 862 1,301 1,364

Other 1,197 1,197 1,196 1,194

5. Projected Coal Production for the Electric Power Sector 

Coal production for electricity generation is expected to increase with or without the proposed 

CAIR (Table 6). The reductions in emissions from the power sector will be met through the 

installation of pollution controls for SO2 and NOx. 
Table 6: Coal Production in the Electric Power Sector (Million Tons)

Supply 

Area

2009 2018

Base Case CAIR Case Base Case CAIR Case

Appalachia 327 296 297 306

Interior 182 184 189 212

West 528 545 611 550

National 1,038 1,025 1,096 1,067

6. Projected Retail Electricity Prices 

National average retail electricity prices in the CAIR Case are projected to increase 2.4 percent 

in 2009 and 1.6 percent in 2018. Table 7 and Table 8 summarize the national and regional level 

retail electricity prices. These estimates were developed using the Retail Electricity Price Model. 

Table 7: National Average Retail Electricity Prices (1999 Mills/kWh)

Base Case CAIR Case Percent Change

2009 59.4 60.9 2.4%

2018 63.2 64.3 1.6%

Source: Retail Electricity Price Model as documented in 

http://www.epa.gov/clearskies/tech_sectiong.pdf

Retail electricity prices by NERC region are in Table 8

Table 8: Retail Electricity Prices by NERC Region (1999 Mills/kWh)

Power

Primary States Included

Base Case CAIR Case

Region 2009 2018 2009 2018

ECAR OH,MI,IN,KY,WV,PA 51.3 56.7 53.8 58.7

ERCOT TX 53.0 65.0 54.8 65.3

MAAC PA,NJ,MD,DC,DE 56.9 69.3 59.5 71.6

MAIN IL,MO,WI 51.9 60.3 53.6 61.7

MAPP MN,IA,SD,ND,NE 54.6 49.4 54.7 49.8

NY NY 80.0 88.1 81.8 89.6

NE VT,NH,ME,MA,CT,RI 73.8 82.8 75.4 83.5

FRCC FL 70.8 68.8 71.7 69.6

STV VA,NC,SC,GA,AL,MS,TN,AR,LA 56.4 54.1 57.4 55.3

SPP KS,OK,MO 52.8 57.4 53.7 58.0

PNW WA,OR,ID 50.1 48.0 50.6 48.0

RM MT,WY,CO,UT,NM,AZ,NV,ID 61.5 65.1 62.1 65.2

CALI CA 96.8 98.2 97.6 98.3

Source: Retail Electricity Price Model as documented in 

http://www.epa.gov/clearskies/tech_sectiong.pdf

7. Projected Fuel Price Impacts 

The impacts of the CAIR on mine mouth coal prices and natural gas prices at the Henry Hub are 

summarized in Table 9. 
Table 9: Average Coal Mine Mouth and Henry Hub Natural Gas Prices (1999$/MMBtu)

Fuel

Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

Coal 0.62 0.55 0.60 0.55

Natural Gas 2.77 2.97 2.9 2.99

D. Limitations of Analysis 

VISTAS modeling using IPM is based on various economic and engineering input assumptions 

that are inherently uncertain, such as assumptions for future fuel prices, electricity demand 

growth and the cost and performance of control technologies. As configured, IPM does not take 

into account demand response (i.e., consumer reaction to changes in electricity prices). 
E. Appendix 

1. Changes made to the NEEDS NODA Database for the VISTAS Analysis

NEEDS NODA is the most recent version of the NEEDS database that EPA has made public. It 

contains existing and planned/committed generation unit data in the contiguous United States. 

In Appendix 1, the changes suggested by VISTAS and MRPO stakeholders are presented side 

by side against the values in the original NEEDS NODA for comparison. For description of the 

items changed, please visit website http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/epa-ipm/index.html.
Table A1 Changes made to NOx Post Combustion Control Installations on Existing Units

Plant Name Unique ID Post Combustion 

NOx Control

(NEEDS NODA)

Post Combustion 

NOx Control 

(VISTAS)

Data Source*

ASHEVILLE 2706_B_1 SNCR None Progress Energy **

BARRY 3_B_1 SNCR None Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_2 SNCR None Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_3 SNCR None Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_4 SNCR None Southern Company

Barry 3_G_A1 None SCR Southern Company

Barry 3_G_A2ST None SCR Southern Company

MT STORM 3954_B_3 None SCR NC-WV-SC

PLEASANTS 6004_B_1 None SCR NC-WV-SC

PLEASANTS 6004_B_2 None SCR NC-WV-SC

Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_3 None SCR Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_3CT None SCR Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_4CT None SCR Southern Company

* Data Source shows the names of sheets in NEEDS-NODA-VISTAS-Aug18Rev.xls, provided by Gregory Stella, 

VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.

** Progress Energy Compliance Plan for NC Clean Smokestacks Rule shows the existing NOx control as AEFLGR

and not SNCR.
Table A2 Changes made to NOx Emission Rates (lbs/MMBtu)

Plant Name Unique ID

Mode1 

Rate**

(VISTAS)

Mode2 

Rate**

(VISTAS)

Mode3 

Rate**

(VISTAS)

Mode4 

Rate**

(VISTAS) Data Source*

GREENE COUNTY 10_B_1 0.718 0.718 0.468 0.468 Southern Company

GREENE COUNTY 10_B_2 0.416 0.416 0.380 0.380 Southern Company

Greene County 10_G_GT10 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

Greene County 10_G_GT2 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

Greene County 10_G_GT3 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

Greene County 10_G_GT4 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

Greene County 10_G_GT5 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

Greene County 10_G_GT6 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

Greene County 10_G_GT7 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

Greene County 10_G_GT8 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

Greene County 10_G_GT9 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

CROSS 130_B_1 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 SC

CROSS 130_B_2 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 SC

EATON 2046_B_1 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company

EATON 2046_B_2 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company

EATON 2046_B_3 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company

Chevron Oil 2047_G_1 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

Chevron Oil 2047_G_2 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

Chevron Oil 2047_G_3 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

Chevron Oil 2047_G_4 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

Chevron Oil 2047_G_5 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.064 Southern Company

SWEATT 2048_B_1 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company

SWEATT 2048_B_2 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company

Sweatt 2048_G_A 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_1 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_2 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_3 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_4 0.470 0.470 0.415 0.415 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_5 0.590 0.590 0.415 0.415 Southern Company

Jack Watson 2049_G_A 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_1 0.473 0.473 0.473 0.473 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_2 0.473 0.473 0.473 0.473 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_3 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_4 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_5 0.429 0.060 0.429 0.060 Southern Company

E C Gaston 26_G_GT4 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

ASHEVILLE 2706_B_1 0.491 0.319 0.491 0.319 -

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_5 0.294 0.070 0.294 0.070 NC-WV-SC

BARRY 3_B_1 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_2 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_3 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_4 0.290 0.290 0.290 0.290 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_5 0.380 0.380 0.380 0.380 Southern Company

Barry 3_G_A1 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Barry 3_G_A1CT 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Barry 3_G_A1ST 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Barry 3_G_A2C1 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Barry 3_G_A2C2 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Barry 3_G_A2ST 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

W S LEE 3264_B_1 0.393 0.393 0.250 0.250 NC-WV-SC

W S LEE 3264_B_2 0.415 0.415 0.250 0.250 NC-WV-SC

W S Lee 3264_G_4 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 SC

W S Lee 3264_G_5 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 SC

W S Lee 3264_G_6 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 SC

MCMEEKIN 3287_B_MC 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 SC
Plant Name Unique ID

Mode1 

Rate**

(VISTAS)

Mode2 

Rate**

(VISTAS)

Mode3 

Rate**

(VISTAS)

Mode4 

Rate**

(VISTAS) Data Source*

M1

MCMEEKIN

3287_B_MC

M2 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 SC

MT STORM 3954_B_3 0.604 0.060 0.604 0.060 NC-WV-SC

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_1 0.275 0.060 0.275 0.060 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_2 0.247 0.060 0.247 0.060 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_3 0.306 0.070 0.306 0.070 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_4 0.275 0.070 0.275 0.070 Southern Company

PLEASANTS 6004_B_1 0.302 0.060 0.302 0.060 NC-WV-SC

PLEASANTS 6004_B_2 0.335 0.060 0.335 0.060 NC-WV-SC

WANSLEY 6052_B_1 0.405 0.070 0.405 0.070 Southern Company

WANSLEY 6052_B_2 0.390 0.070 0.390 0.070 Southern Company

Wansley 6052_G_5A 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

VICTOR J DANIEL JR. 6073_B_1 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310 Southern Company

VICTOR J DANIEL JR. 6073_B_2 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_3 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr

6073_G_3C

T 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr

6073_G_3S

T 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_4 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr

6073_G_4C

T 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr

6073_G_4S

T 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

MCINTOSH 6124_B_1 0.613 0.613 0.410 0.410 Southern Company

McIntosh

6124_G_CT

1 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh

6124_G_CT

2 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh

6124_G_CT

3 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh

6124_G_CT

4 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh

6124_G_CT

5 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh

6124_G_CT

6 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh

6124_G_CT

7 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh

6124_G_CT

8 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

WINYAH 6249_B_1 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 SC

WINYAH 6249_B_2 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 SC

WINYAH 6249_B_3 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 SC

WINYAH 6249_B_4 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 SC

SCHERER 6257_B_1 0.450 0.450 0.150 0.150 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_2 0.450 0.450 0.150 0.150 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_3 0.300 0.300 0.150 0.150 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_4 0.300 0.300 0.150 0.150 Southern Company

Wilson 6258_G_5A 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

Wilson 6258_G_5B 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

Wilson 6258_G_5C 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

Wilson 6258_G_5D 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

Wilson 6258_G_5E 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

Wilson 6258_G_5F 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

Wilson 6258_G_IC1 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_2 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_3 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_4 0.400 0.400 0.240 0.240 Southern Company
Plant Name Unique ID

Mode1 

Rate**

(VISTAS)

Mode2 

Rate**

(VISTAS)

Mode3 

Rate**

(VISTAS)

Mode4 

Rate**

(VISTAS) Data Source*

CRIST 641_B_5 0.400 0.400 0.240 0.240 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_7 0.482 0.060 0.482 0.060 Southern Company

SCHOLZ 642_B_1 0.540 0.540 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

SCHOLZ 642_B_2 0.570 0.570 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

SMITH 643_B_1 0.490 0.490 0.240 0.240 Southern Company

SMITH 643_B_2 0.410 0.410 0.410 0.410 Southern Company

Lansing Smith 643_G_CT1 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

GADSDEN 7_B_1 0.544 0.544 0.544 0.544 Southern Company

GADSDEN 7_B_2 0.544 0.544 0.544 0.544 Southern Company

Atkinson 700_G_5A 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

Atkinson 700_G_5B 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

BOWEN

703_B_1BL

R 0.405 0.070 0.405 0.070 Southern Company

BOWEN

703_B_2BL

R 0.405 0.070 0.405 0.070 Southern Company

BOWEN

703_B_3BL

R 0.409 0.070 0.409 0.070 Southern Company

BOWEN

703_B_4BL

R 0.419 0.070 0.419 0.070 Southern Company

Bowen 703_G_6 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_1 0.800 0.800 0.410 0.410 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_2 0.800 0.800 0.410 0.410 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_3 0.800 0.800 0.410 0.410 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_4 0.404 0.070 0.404 0.070 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_1 0.800 0.800 0.519 0.519 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_2 0.800 0.800 0.374 0.374 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_3 0.800 0.800 0.381 0.381 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_4 0.800 0.800 0.381 0.381 Southern Company

JACK MCDONOUGH 710_B_MB1 0.450 0.450 0.230 0.230 Southern Company

JACK MCDONOUGH 710_B_MB2 0.450 0.450 0.230 0.230 Southern Company

Jack McDonough 710_G_3A 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

Jack McDonough 710_G_3B 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

MCMANUS 715_B_1 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310 Southern Company

MCMANUS 715_B_2 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310 Southern Company

McManus 715_G_3A 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

McManus 715_G_3B 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

McManus 715_G_3C 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

McManus 715_G_4A 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

McManus 715_G_4B 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

McManus 715_G_4C 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

McManus 715_G_4D 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

McManus 715_G_4E 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

McManus 715_G_4F 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

McManus 715_G_IC1 3.200 3.200 3.200 3.200 Southern Company

MITCHELL 727_B_3 0.625 0.625 0.625 0.625 Southern Company

Mitchell 727_G_4A 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

Mitchell 727_G_4B 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

Mitchell 727_G_4C 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company

* Data Source shows the names of sheets in NEEDS-NODA-VISTAS-Aug18Rev.xls, provided by Gregory Stella, 

VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories. “SC” reflects the spreadsheet CopyofSCIPMdata.xls. Rate 

changes include VISTAS interpretation of stakeholder submitted data.

** 

Mode 1 Rate (Uncontrolled Base Rate) – This emission rate reflects current configuration of combustion 

controls. If a post combustion NOx control such as a SCR or a SNCR exists, it is assumed that it is not 

operating.

Mode 2 Rate (Controlled Base Rate) – This emission rate reflects current configuration of combustion

controls. If a post combustion NOx control such as a SCR or a SNCR exists, it is assumed that it is 

operating.
Mode 3 Rate (Uncontrolled Policy Rate) – This emission rate reflects a state of the art configuration of 

combustion controls. If a post combustion NOx control such as a SCR or a SNCR exists, it is assumed 

that it is not operating.

Mode 4 Rate (Controlled Policy Rate) – This emission rate reflects a state of the art configuration of 

combustion controls. If a post combustion NOx control such as a SCR or a SNCR exists, it is assumed 

that it is operating.

For more details on the development of these rates please refer to 

http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/epa-ipm/section3powsysop.pdf
Table A3 Changes made to SO2 Scrubber Installations on Existing Units

Plant Name Unique ID Wet/DryScrubber

(NEEDS NODA)

Wet/DryScrubber

(VISTAS)

Data Source*

NORTH BRANCH POWER 

STATION

7537_B_1A Dry Scrubber - NC-WV-SC 

NORTH BRANCH POWER 

STATION

7537_B_1B Dry Scrubber - NC-WV-SC 

Morgantown Energy Facility 10743_G_GEN1 Dry Scrubber - NC-WV-SC 

* Data Source shows the name of sheets in NEEDS-NODA-VISTAS-Aug18Rev.xls, provided by Gregory Stella, 

VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.
Table A4 Changes made to SO2 Emission Rate Limits (lbs/MMBtu)

Plant Name Unique ID SO2 Rate (NEEDS 

NODA)

SO2 Rate (VISTAS) Data Source*

GREENE COUNTY 10_B_1 4.000 1.197 Southern Company

GREENE COUNTY 10_B_2 4.000 1.197 Southern Company

EATON 2046_B_1 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

EATON 2046_B_2 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

EATON 2046_B_3 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

SWEATT 2048_B_1 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

SWEATT 2048_B_2 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_1 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_2 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_3 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_4 4.800 0.885 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_5 4.800 0.885 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_1 3.800 1.667 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_2 3.800 1.667 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_3 3.800 1.667 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_4 3.800 1.667 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_5 3.800 1.667 Southern Company

BUCK 2720_B_5 2.300 1.630 NC-WV-SC

BUCK 2720_B_6 2.300 1.630 NC-WV-SC

BUCK 2720_B_7 2.300 1.630 NC-WV-SC

BUCK 2720_B_8 2.300 1.630 NC-WV-SC

BUCK 2720_B_9 2.300 1.630 NC-WV-SC

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_1 2.300 2.200 NC-WV-SC

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_2 2.300 2.200 NC-WV-SC

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_3 2.300 2.200 NC-WV-SC

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_4 2.300 2.200 NC-WV-SC

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_5 2.300 2.200 NC-WV-SC

DAN RIVER 2723_B_1 2.300 1.810 NC-WV-SC

DAN RIVER 2723_B_2 2.300 1.810 NC-WV-SC

DAN RIVER 2723_B_3 2.300 1.810 NC-WV-SC

BARRY 3_B_1 1.800 1.197 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_2 1.800 1.197 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_3 1.800 1.197 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_4 1.800 1.197 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_5 1.800 1.197 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_1 1.800 0.795 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_2 1.800 0.795 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_3 1.800 0.795 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_4 1.800 0.795 Southern Company

VICTOR J DANIEL JR. 6073_B_1 4.800 0.885 Southern Company

VICTOR J DANIEL JR. 6073_B_2 4.800 0.885 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_1 1.200 0.796 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_2 1.200 0.796 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_3 1.200 0.796 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_4 1.200 0.796 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_2 0.740 0.001 Southern Company
Plant Name Unique ID SO2 Rate (NEEDS 

NODA)

SO2 Rate (VISTAS) Data Source*

CRIST 641_B_3 0.740 0.001 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_4 5.900 1.197 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_5 5.900 1.197 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_6 5.900 1.197 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_7 5.900 1.197 Southern Company

SCHOLZ 642_B_1 6.170 1.200 Southern Company

SCHOLZ 642_B_2 6.170 1.200 Southern Company

SMITH 643_B_1 6.170 1.197 Southern Company

SMITH 643_B_2 6.170 1.197 Southern Company

GADSDEN 7_B_1 4.000 2.500 Southern Company

GADSDEN 7_B_2 4.000 2.500 Southern Company

BOWEN 703_B_1BLR 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_1 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_2 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_3 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_4 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_1 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_2 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_3 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_4 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

JACK MCDONOUGH 710_B_MB1 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

JACK MCDONOUGH 710_B_MB2 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

MCMANUS 715_B_1 3.159 2.620 Southern Company

MCMANUS 715_B_2 3.159 2.620 Southern Company

MITCHELL 727_B_3 4.580 2.500 Southern Company

YATES 728_B_Y2BR 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

YATES 728_B_Y3BR 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

YATES 728_B_Y4BR 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

YATES 728_B_Y5BR 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

KRAFT 733_B_1 4.580 1.270 Southern Company

KRAFT 733_B_2 4.580 1.270 Southern Company

KRAFT 733_B_3 4.580 1.270 Southern Company

KRAFT 733_B_4 0.800 0.001 Southern Company

RIVERSIDE 734_B_11 2.632 0.001 Southern Company

RIVERSIDE 734_B_12 3.159 0.001 Southern Company

RIVERSIDE 734_B_4 2.632 0.001 Southern Company

RIVERSIDE 734_B_5 2.632 0.001 Southern Company

RIVERSIDE 734_B_6 2.632 0.001 Southern Company

GORGAS 8_B_10 4.000 1.667 Southern Company

GORGAS 8_B_6 4.000 2.500 Southern Company

GORGAS 8_B_7 4.000 2.500 Southern Company

GORGAS 8_B_8 4.000 1.667 Southern Company

GORGAS 8_B_9 4.000 1.667 Southern Company

• Data Source shows the names of sheets in NEEDS-NODA-VISTAS-Aug18Rev.xls, provided by Gregory Stella, VISTAS 

Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.
Table A5 Changes made to Particulate Matter (PM) Control Installations on Existing Units

Plant Name Unique ID PM Control (NEEDS NODA) PM Control (VISTAS) Data Sources *

G G ALLEN 2718_B_3 Hot-side ESP Cold-side ESP NC-WV-SC

G G ALLEN 2718_B_5 Hot-side ESP Cold-side ESP NC-WV-SC

WESTON 4078_B_3 Hot-side ESP + Fabric Filter Fabric Filter Wisconsin

* Data Sources shows the name of sheets in NEEDS-NODA-VISTAS-Aug18Rev.xls, provided by Gregory Stella, 

VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.
Table A6 Changes made to Summer Net Dependable Capacity (MW)

Plant Name Unique ID Capacity 

(NEEDS NODA)

Capacity 

(VISTAS)

Data Source*

VACA_SC_Combined Cycle 077_C_077 1317 807 SC 

CRIST 641_B_1 24 0 ** Southern Company

Lansing Smith A274_G_A274 500 530 Southern Company

Atkinson 700_G_5A 32 15.3 Southern Company

Atkinson 700_G_5B 32 15.3 Southern Company

Dahlberg 7709_G_10 75 80 Southern Company

Dahlberg 7709_G_9 75 80 Southern Company

FRANKLIN A7840_G_A331 570 630 Southern Company

Mill Creek A294_G_A294 320 326.8 NC-WV-SC

Mill Creek A295_G_A295 240 245.1 NC-WV-SC

Mill Creek A296_G_A296 80 81.7 NC-WV-SC

SCE&G Hardeeville 3286_C_2 170 SC

SCE&G Hardeeville 3286_C_3 170 SC

SCE&G Hardeeville 3286_C_4 170 SC

Cross 3 130_C_3 660 SC

* Data Source shows the name of sheets in NEEDS-NODA-VISTAS-Aug18Rev.xls, provided by Gregory Stella, 

VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories. “SC” reflects the spreadsheet CopyofSCIPMdata.xls.

** Zero capacity denotes that the unit was retired in 2002.
Table A7 Changes made to Heat Rate (Btu/kWh)

Plant Name Unique ID ORIS Code BGCI Unit ID Heat Rate

(NEEDS NODA)

Heat Rate 

(VISTAS)

Data Source*

ALLEN S KING 1915_B_1 1915 B 1 8879 9229 Minnesota

* Data Source shows the name of sheets in NEEDS-NODA-VISTAS-Aug18Rev.xls, provided by Gregory Stella, 

VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.
Table A8 Changes made to Unit ID

Plant Name Unique ID ORIS Code BGCI Unit ID (NEEDS 

NODA)

Unit ID 

(VISTAS)

Data Source*

Talbot County Energy A397_G_A397 7916 G 397 1 Oglethorpe

Talbot County Energy A398_G_A398 7916 G 398 2 Oglethorpe

Talbot County Energy A399_G_A399 7916 G 399 3-4 Oglethorpe

Talbot County Energy A400_G_A400 7916 G 400 5-6 Oglethorpe

Mill Creek A294_G_A294 7981 G 294 1-4 NC-WV-SC

Mill Creek A295_G_A295 7981 G 295 5-7 NC-WV-SC

Mill Creek A296_G_A296 7981 G 296 8 NC-WV-SC

* Data Source shows the name of sheets in NEEDS-NODA-VISTAS-Aug18Rev.xls, provided by Gregory Stella, 

VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.
Table A9 Duke and Progress Energy SO2 Control Plan for North Carolina Clean Smokestacks Rule

Unit Technology Operation Date Company

Asheville 1 Scrubber 2005 Progress Energy

Asheville 2 Scrubber 2006 Progress Energy

Cape Fear 5 Scrubber 2012 Progress Energy

Cape Fear 6 Scrubber 2011 Progress Energy

Mayo 1 Scrubber 2008 Progress Energy

Roxboro 1 Scrubber 2009 Progress Energy

Roxboro 2 Scrubber 2007 Progress Energy

Roxboro 3 Scrubber 2007 Progress Energy

Roxboro 4 Scrubber 2007 Progress Energy

Sutton 3 Scrubber 2012 Progress Energy

Allen 1 Scrubber 2011 Duke Power

Allen 2 Scrubber 2011 Duke Power

Allen 3 Scrubber 2011 Duke Power

Allen 4 Scrubber 2012 Duke Power

Allen 5 Scrubber 2012 Duke Power

Belews Creek 1 Scrubber 2008 Duke Power

Belews Creek 2 Scrubber 2008 Duke Power

Cliffside 5 Scrubber 2009 Duke Power

Marshall 1 Scrubber 2007 Duke Power

Marshall 2 Scrubber 2007 Duke Power

Marshall 3 Scrubber 2006 Duke Power

Marshall 4 Scrubber 2006 Duke Power

Source: Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.
Table A10 Duke and Progress Energy NOx Control Plan for North Carolina Clean Smokestacks Rule

Unit Technology Operation Date Company

Asheville 1 SCR 2009 Progress Energy

Lee 2 ROFA 2007 Progress Energy

Lee 3 SCR 2010 Progress Energy

Sutton 2 ROFA 2006 Progress Energy

Allen 1 SNCR 2003 Duke Power

Allen 2 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Allen 3 SNCR 2005 Duke Power

Allen 4 SNCR 2006 Duke Power

Allen 5 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Belews Creek 1 SCR 2003 Duke Power

Belews Creek 2 SCR 2004 Duke Power

Buck 3 SNCR 2009 Duke Power

Buck 4 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Buck 5 SNCR 2006 Duke Power

Buck 6 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Cliffside 1 SNCR 2009 Duke Power

Cliffside 2 SNCR 2009 Duke Power

Cliffside 3 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Cliffside 4 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Cliffside 5 SCR 2002 Duke Power

Dan River 1 SNCR 2009 Duke Power

Dan River 2 SNCR 2009 Duke Power

Dan River 3 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Marshall 1 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Marshall 2 SNCR 2006 Duke Power

Marshall 3 SNCR 2005 Duke Power

Marshall 4 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Riverbend 4 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Riverbend 5 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Riverbend 6 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Riverbend 7 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Source: Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.
2. Emission Results

Tables A11, A12, A13 and A14 present the Base Case and the CAIR Case NOx and SO2 emissions by state and 

season in 2009 and 2018 run years.
Table A11 State Level Base Case NOx Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

NOx Emission 

(Base Case)

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

CAIR Affected States

Alabama 97.93 100.12 34.06 34.89

Arkansas 23.92 24.68 19.73 19.96

District Of Columbia 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.05

Delaware 6.09 7.30 2.78 3.42

Florida 80.78 86.48 67.84 72.61

Georgia 92.95 94.65 38.95 34.29

Iowa 39.67 47.64 30.90 36.59

Illinois 101.87 119.29 27.74 37.91

Indiana 176.21 183.22 61.12 61.74

Kansas 46.35 50.19 36.58 39.32

Kentucky 131.21 132.43 47.76 49.80

Louisiana 27.55 28.46 22.92 23.26

Massachusetts 9.80 11.69 5.64 8.74

Maryland 48.93 50.40 9.07 9.88

Michigan 80.77 85.49 35.64 34.26

Minnesota 39.60 44.65 30.21 34.14

Missouri 84.20 86.01 33.32 30.67

Mississippi 20.98 21.97 17.68 18.21

North Carolina 40.99 39.94 25.74 24.73

New Jersey 10.93 13.57 4.76 5.79

New York 31.75 30.74 18.00 18.79

Ohio 221.12 234.60 50.99 47.99

Pennsylvania 139.63 144.99 58.57 54.52

South Carolina 33.44 35.53 17.06 19.70

Tennessee 88.26 88.30 18.75 24.15

Texas 91.74 91.77 92.76 102.30

Virginia 44.06 37.63 21.15 19.35

Wisconsin 44.08 44.81 35.52 35.59

West Virginia 146.12 147.16 27.86 23.37

Total 2,000.92 2,083.74 893.12 926.01

Non CAIR States

Arizona 43.51 45.10 35.05 35.71

California 21.46 18.71 13.13 12.91

Colorado 38.20 39.43 30.04 30.90

Connecticut 3.56 4.49 2.63 2.81

Idaho 0.85 0.76 0.65 0.34

Maine 1.03 1.04 0.81 0.82

Montana 21.40 21.42 16.92 17.01

North Dakota 39.97 39.97 31.67 31.67

Nebraska 27.26 27.49 21.75 21.96

New Hampshire 1.33 1.65 0.74 1.18

New Mexico 40.80 40.90 32.70 32.97

Nevada 18.94 21.12 10.94 16.55

Oklahoma 41.56 41.86 36.02 38.41
NOx Emission 

(Base Case)

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

Oregon 7.54 7.79 5.89 6.07

Rhode Island 0.29 0.32 0.23 0.30

South Dakota 8.10 8.11 6.44 6.44

Utah 33.87 33.83 26.88 26.43

Vermont 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02

Washington 16.48 14.94 12.19 11.79

Wyoming 45.24 45.24 35.93 35.93

Total 411.39 414.19 320.62 330.23

National Total 2,412.31 2,497.93 1,213.74 1,256.23
Table A12 State Level Base Case SO2 Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

SO2 Emission

(Base Case)

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

CAIR Affected States

Alabama 279.95 209.76 185.64 165.55

Arkansas 45.95 45.95 36.49 36.49

District Of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Delaware 22.94 26.88 15.11 17.45

Florida 122.20 120.04 97.19 95.45

Georgia 328.97 310.23 253.11 243.79

Iowa 86.91 101.85 66.32 78.32

Illinois 215.50 242.21 130.41 177.13

Indiana 434.76 300.46 291.49 228.01

Kansas 45.06 47.83 36.59 37.99

Kentucky 279.82 241.21 203.42 188.21

Louisiana 55.29 55.29 43.92 43.92

Massachusetts 9.55 10.21 2.21 6.86

Maryland 179.99 187.19 129.98 143.59

Michigan 219.48 227.46 160.86 177.17

Minnesota 52.19 53.20 39.47 39.43

Missouri 153.41 158.24 110.96 119.58

Mississippi 47.72 47.72 37.90 37.90

North Carolina 109.66 80.15 72.83 53.68

New Jersey 31.74 19.49 22.99 14.08

New York 100.81 89.14 48.13 53.50

Ohio 860.12 647.74 584.09 460.62

Pennsylvania 525.90 503.94 359.82 361.58

South Carolina 93.19 99.82 70.44 79.21

Tennessee 274.69 184.91 161.76 138.75

Texas 221.74 231.04 184.26 188.83

Virginia 133.86 103.85 87.09 77.75

Wisconsin 87.01 85.93 69.31 67.53

West Virginia 349.02 274.96 249.54 208.00

Total 5,367.45 4,706.71 3,751.31 3,540.37

Non CAIR States

Arizona 33.81 28.38 26.85 22.54

California 3.64 3.64 2.88 2.88

Colorado 51.13 51.13 40.59 40.61

Connecticut 3.62 3.62 2.85 2.85

Idaho 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02

Maine 3.01 3.01 2.42 2.42

Montana 11.32 12.90 8.95 10.28

North Dakota 74.59 74.54 58.98 58.94

Nebraska 39.52 39.92 31.48 31.63

New Hampshire 5.20 4.62 2.26 2.98

New Mexico 29.49 29.49 23.42 23.42

Nevada 12.09 13.32 6.14 10.25

Oklahoma 65.56 65.56 52.08 52.08
SO2 Emission

(Base Case)

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

Oregon 5.67 5.67 4.50 4.50

Rhode Island 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

South Dakota 6.74 6.74 5.35 5.35

Utah 29.65 20.86 23.43 15.04

Vermont 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01

Washington 6.63 6.65 5.15 5.17

Wyoming 41.73 28.93 33.14 22.98

Total 423.46 399.05 330.53 313.96

National Total 5,790.90 5,105.76 4,081.84 3,854.33
Table A13 State Level CAIR Case NOx Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

NOx Emission

(CAIR Case)

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

CAIR Affected States

Alabama 96.01 21.06 36.32 18.89

Arkansas 24.01 17.81 19.73 14.41

District Of Columbia 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.04

Delaware 4.92 3.86 0.92 3.01

Florida 80.05 30.71 67.84 28.83

Georgia 88.13 33.33 31.30 32.22

Iowa 39.36 23.69 30.64 16.83

Illinois 108.01 38.49 33.62 30.78

Indiana 174.47 49.88 64.17 37.28

Kansas 46.51 17.41 36.48 14.84

Kentucky 129.41 36.28 47.90 28.43

Louisiana 27.80 16.91 22.92 14.01

Massachusetts 10.03 8.38 6.43 6.23

Maryland 46.83 7.76 11.25 6.58

Michigan 80.25 39.64 35.94 30.88

Minnesota 40.35 21.80 30.79 17.02

Missouri 82.31 50.25 36.39 27.68

Mississippi 20.98 5.68 17.78 5.11

North Carolina 40.69 33.56 26.50 26.49

New Jersey 11.08 6.73 4.27 5.64

New York 25.18 22.18 19.25 17.99

Ohio 214.10 47.83 43.53 34.32

Pennsylvania 129.93 42.08 54.03 33.21

South Carolina 34.01 20.39 16.20 16.00

Tennessee 87.13 15.77 17.44 16.68

Texas 91.58 82.32 92.49 90.41

Virginia 39.54 23.15 23.53 17.15

Wisconsin 41.88 21.25 33.52 16.56

West Virginia 145.07 24.52 29.50 17.70

Total 1,959.60 762.79 890.73 625.24

Non CAIR States

Arizona 43.50 45.11 35.04 35.68

California 20.40 18.52 13.00 12.91

Colorado 38.14 39.55 30.05 30.88

Connecticut 3.90 5.06 3.00 3.50

Idaho 0.85 0.78 0.65 0.34

Maine 1.03 1.08 0.76 0.85

Montana 21.40 21.42 16.98 17.01

North Dakota 38.73 39.97 29.27 31.76

Nebraska 27.43 27.52 21.83 22.08

New Hampshire 0.97 1.71 0.75 1.35

New Mexico 40.80 40.92 32.70 32.98

Nevada 19.96 22.36 11.06 17.60

Oklahoma 41.64 42.42 36.06 40.57
NOx Emission

(CAIR Case)

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

Oregon 7.54 7.79 5.89 6.07

Rhode Island 0.29 0.34 0.21 0.30

South Dakota 8.10 8.11 6.44 6.45

Utah 33.87 33.83 26.86 26.43

Vermont 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02

Washington 16.48 14.94 12.19 11.78

Wyoming 45.24 45.24 35.93 35.93

Total 410.29 416.69 318.68 334.51

National Total 2,369.89 1,179.48 1,209.41 959.75
Table A14 State Level CAIR Case SO2 Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

SO2 Emission

(CAIR Case)

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

CAIR Affected States

Alabama 190.85 125.61 124.00 100.91

Arkansas 45.95 45.95 36.49 36.49

District Of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Delaware 16.78 9.84 5.14 7.09

Florida 110.87 70.51 89.28 56.09

Georgia 244.73 117.05 149.70 104.56

Iowa 89.51 97.92 68.86 71.77

Illinois 141.81 149.61 93.99 113.51

Indiana 200.81 182.52 140.39 139.08

Kansas 44.63 40.60 35.76 32.84

Kentucky 197.05 127.58 145.63 98.20

Louisiana 34.59 18.80 27.47 14.93

Massachusetts 10.70 9.48 2.93 6.73

Maryland 41.64 14.40 25.23 10.01

Michigan 216.30 221.63 157.75 174.22

Minnesota 45.46 47.48 35.48 35.41

Missouri 148.86 151.22 110.16 118.11

Mississippi 47.72 28.96 37.90 23.00

North Carolina 80.70 41.41 51.49 36.93

New Jersey 19.09 11.35 15.17 8.65

New York 57.16 26.70 37.60 20.71

Ohio 259.36 122.94 144.93 88.31

Pennsylvania 128.67 74.04 77.16 57.49

South Carolina 85.48 85.74 58.09 66.81

Tennessee 168.50 53.32 111.44 50.29

Texas 216.76 195.36 178.90 159.08

Virginia 89.83 66.57 51.09 49.68

Wisconsin 83.88 78.63 66.32 62.03

West Virginia 154.15 64.86 92.70 47.07

Total 3,171.82 2,280.08 2,171.02 1,789.98

Non CAIR States

Arizona 33.81 28.38 26.85 22.54

California 3.64 3.64 2.88 2.88

Colorado 50.79 51.16 40.28 40.61

Connecticut 3.62 3.62 2.58 2.85

Idaho 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02

Maine 3.01 3.01 2.10 2.42

Montana 11.32 13.00 9.01 10.33

North Dakota 71.08 74.54 54.63 59.20

Nebraska 39.82 39.92 31.63 31.70

New Hampshire 0.92 4.47 0.70 3.52

New Mexico 29.49 29.49 23.42 23.42

Nevada 12.90 14.33 6.23 11.09

Oklahoma 65.56 65.56 52.08 52.08
SO2 Emission

(CAIR Case)

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

Oregon 5.67 5.67 4.50 4.50

Rhode Island 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

South Dakota 6.74 6.74 5.35 5.35

Utah 29.65 20.86 23.35 15.04

Vermont 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01

Washington 6.11 6.65 4.80 5.17

Wyoming 39.68 28.93 31.52 22.98

Total 413.87 400.02 321.96 315.72

National Total 3,585.68 2,680.10 2,492.97 2,105.71
3. Generation Results

Tables A15 and A16 present the generation in the Base Case and the CAIR Case by state and season in 2009 and 

2018 run years.
Table A15 State Level Base Case Generation by Season (GWh)

Base Case Generation

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

CAIR Affected States

Alabama 89,306 107,340 71,273 89,828

Arkansas 27,458 35,937 27,331 29,377

District Of Columbia - 70 - 113

Delaware 3,688 4,873 2,754 4,030

Florida 103,348 140,092 91,525 117,000

Georgia 93,099 103,667 73,028 86,929

Iowa 26,718 32,128 20,016 23,757

Illinois 111,860 120,671 79,329 91,331

Indiana 78,544 86,210 57,036 65,667

Kansas 26,507 27,819 21,332 22,583

Kentucky 61,480 62,605 46,396 48,451

Louisiana 35,891 48,346 35,855 38,090

Massachusetts 31,527 37,098 22,173 27,421

Maryland 31,487 33,118 22,747 26,002

Michigan 61,566 75,353 45,410 54,723

Minnesota 27,529 31,431 21,104 23,976

Missouri 51,304 54,766 38,644 42,737

Mississippi 20,631 32,250 24,165 29,593

North Carolina 72,173 77,731 54,210 58,315

New Jersey 31,669 38,312 26,922 29,698

New York 86,175 90,403 66,311 69,245

Ohio 98,345 111,448 69,610 80,018

Pennsylvania 129,591 140,974 93,686 101,509

South Carolina 57,536 66,909 47,731 54,364

Tennessee 57,630 59,073 40,526 43,453

Texas 175,132 192,596 176,889 210,649

Virginia 44,517 55,805 34,038 42,987

Wisconsin 37,353 40,072 29,408 31,217

West Virginia 60,407 61,029 45,922 47,604

Total 1,732,468 1,968,124 1,385,371 1,590,666

Non CAIR States

Arizona 68,796 84,020 58,556 66,427

California 153,862 193,482 115,891 148,755

Colorado 24,277 29,820 17,665 22,200

Connecticut 18,145 20,347 12,832 13,661

Idaho 6,535 6,859 5,123 4,814

Maine 4,510 4,554 3,259 3,284

Montana 14,651 15,017 11,972 12,277

North Dakota 15,999 15,999 12,683 12,688

Nebraska 17,523 17,985 14,926 15,717

New Hampshire 19,201 18,995 14,611 14,436

New Mexico 16,508 17,492 13,485 14,417

Nevada 21,432 24,996 15,590 20,097

Oklahoma 42,002 45,145 36,058 40,794
Base Case Generation

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

Oregon 34,193 37,710 25,959 28,498

Rhode Island 2,822 3,045 1,865 2,474

South Dakota 5,103 5,116 4,200 4,210

Utah 18,558 18,525 14,807 14,561

Vermont 3,328 3,284 2,102 1,985

Washington 61,086 64,342 43,874 47,400

Wyoming 24,650 24,627 19,574 19,555

Total 573,182 651,360 445,030 508,249

National Total 2,305,650 2,619,484 1,830,401 2,098,915 
Table A16 State Level CAIR Case Generation by Season (GWh)

CAIR Case Generation

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

CAIR Affected States

Alabama 94,570 114,813 74,254 91,185

Arkansas 28,520 38,336 27,342 30,538

District Of Columbia - 164 27 140

Delaware 4,109 4,888 1,395 3,816

Florida 103,047 134,673 91,525 114,079

Georgia 90,975 106,074 68,713 87,944

Iowa 26,654 32,155 20,160 22,069

Illinois 113,576 118,442 83,009 91,406

Indiana 77,812 85,811 59,219 64,105

Kansas 26,553 25,090 21,262 21,729

Kentucky 60,623 61,425 45,949 47,837

Louisiana 39,178 47,708 35,792 37,296

Massachusetts 32,086 35,865 22,315 26,056

Maryland 30,432 33,919 22,226 26,140

Michigan 61,409 77,361 45,712 55,464

Minnesota 28,657 31,549 22,190 24,725

Missouri 50,909 54,005 38,878 43,636

Mississippi 20,654 38,386 26,053 31,804

North Carolina 72,011 76,972 54,051 59,626

New Jersey 32,728 37,732 26,430 30,620

New York 86,621 90,452 67,306 70,406

Ohio 94,457 109,773 66,893 80,432

Pennsylvania 125,813 135,339 93,940 100,257

South Carolina 59,092 67,948 47,929 54,154

Tennessee 57,255 55,011 40,017 42,531

Texas 174,956 188,405 176,614 205,557

Virginia 42,300 55,560 34,556 41,982

Wisconsin 37,205 41,005 28,850 31,286

West Virginia 59,826 59,948 43,305 46,823

Total 1,732,029 1,958,806 1,385,910 1,583,642

Non CAIR States

Arizona 68,764 84,088 58,527 66,182

California 153,862 193,060 115,905 148,764

Colorado 23,897 29,789 17,750 22,086

Connecticut 17,851 20,146 12,783 13,817

Idaho 6,535 6,907 5,123 4,809

Maine 4,510 5,032 3,213 3,605

Montana 14,651 15,018 11,996 12,275

North Dakota 15,380 15,999 11,862 12,738

Nebraska 17,566 18,061 14,947 15,816

New Hampshire 18,921 19,856 14,663 15,201

New Mexico 16,514 17,636 13,485 14,519

Nevada 21,896 25,564 15,641 20,582

Oklahoma 42,459 50,227 36,383 45,539
CAIR Case Generation

Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

Oregon 34,193 37,678 25,959 28,474

Rhode Island 2,822 3,032 1,651 2,410

South Dakota 5,103 5,116 4,200 4,220

Utah 18,558 18,525 14,796 14,561

Vermont 3,328 3,446 2,102 2,096

Washington 61,086 64,281 43,874 47,356

Wyoming 24,650 24,627 19,574 19,555

Total 572,547 658,087 444,434 514,605

National Total 2,304,577 2,616,893 1,830,343 2,098,247
4. Cost Results

Tables A17, A18, A19 and A20 present the fixed operation and maintenance cost (FOM), variable operation and 

maintenance cost (VOM), fuel cost and the capital cost in the Base Case and the CAIR Case by IPM model region 

and season in 2009 and 2018 run years respectively.
Table A17 FOM Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

FOM Cost by Region

Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

AZNM 999.8 1,173.9 999.8 1,173.9

CALI 1,399.3 1,767.7 1,397.1 1,767.6

DSNY 554.3 365.1 559.0 386.4

ECAO 3,163.2 3,282.9 3,310.1 3,583.2

ENTG 1,172.8 1,351.0 1,177.5 1,361.8

ERCT 1,905.2 2,084.9 1,905.2 2,097.9

FRCC 1,500.1 1,570.0 1,504.2 1,595.8

LILC 71.1 89.7 79.1 92.5

MACE 1,712.7 1,859.8 1,698.8 1,850.0

MACS 474.3 504.5 503.3 548.3

MACW 843.0 961.8 849.6 989.5

MANO 2,462.9 2,942.4 2,466.9 2,949.6

MAPP 1,282.3 1,352.2 1,276.4 1,347.3

MECS 525.5 625.8 525.5 631.5

NENG 1,230.3 1,246.7 1,233.3 1,247.1

NWPE 512.5 539.5 518.4 545.3

NYC 145.0 162.1 145.0 167.5

PNW 906.4 988.3 906.4 988.1

RMPA 295.2 305.0 295.5 305.3

SOU 1,490.9 1,674.5 1,510.6 1,777.1

SPPN 477.7 564.3 477.7 566.9

SPPS 651.9 715.0 656.3 722.2

TVA 1,380.2 1,469.9 1,384.2 1,508.4

UPNY 726.7 792.6 713.3 782.1

VACA 2,764.7 3,099.6 2,756.4 3,096.6

WUMS 461.8 494.1 461.8 495.5

National Total 29,109.7 31,983.2 29,311.5 32,577.6
Table A18 VOM Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

VOM Cost by Region

Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

AZNM 301.4 349.7 301.3 349.7

CALI 525.1 677.9 523.7 677.6

DSNY 41.0 34.1 41.4 51.4

ECAO 1,218.5 1,316.6 1,378.1 1,883.4

ENTG 158.6 195.1 170.2 228.0

ERCT 493.4 602.5 492.9 621.6

FRCC 303.2 404.1 307.8 466.1

LILC 24.9 39.5 24.4 33.6

MACE 140.5 166.4 137.6 174.4

MACS 70.6 83.1 97.8 141.1

MACW 188.1 203.1 226.7 300.4

MANO 313.9 359.5 335.8 408.4

MAPP 306.1 337.8 309.5 353.1

MECS 146.3 181.0 145.8 211.6

NENG 174.5 205.0 176.8 205.3

NWPE 235.2 249.6 236.7 252.7

NYC 12.1 25.5 12.1 30.0

PNW 93.3 126.3 93.3 126.0

RMPA 117.5 128.0 117.2 127.9

SOU 409.5 512.1 431.8 720.1

SPPN 147.0 158.1 147.4 161.5

SPPS 201.2 231.2 204.0 242.3

TVA 286.2 312.0 290.1 400.3

UPNY 81.8 90.4 85.0 91.1

VACA 570.6 679.9 602.2 720.4

WUMS 110.0 138.3 111.4 143.2

National Total 6,670.4 7,807.0 7,001.0 9,121.3
Table A19 Fuel Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

Fuel Cost by Region

Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

AZNM 2,231.5 2,884.8 2,296.0 2,912.2

CALI 3,804.4 5,249.7 3,883.0 5,266.9

DSNY 512.8 531.4 537.3 642.6

ECAO 5,452.7 6,207.7 5,346.3 5,844.2

ENTG 1,700.8 2,398.6 1,817.2 2,388.2

ERCT 4,950.1 5,835.0 5,121.9 5,812.3

FRCC 2,979.2 4,480.9 3,045.0 4,282.9

LILC 400.7 530.3 407.5 454.6

MACE 1,106.4 1,453.7 1,195.5 1,461.6

MACS 528.2 599.7 502.4 599.4

MACW 1,039.5 1,258.4 1,039.9 1,176.8

MANO 2,073.1 2,192.0 2,133.0 2,158.4

MAPP 1,560.0 1,666.6 1,561.8 1,676.2

MECS 1,070.6 1,322.5 1,075.2 1,434.1

NENG 1,868.1 2,291.3 1,915.8 2,297.8

NWPE 679.2 643.8 687.8 659.6

NYC 313.2 459.5 326.0 512.2

PNW 1,078.6 1,326.2 1,126.8 1,333.3

RMPA 429.3 596.2 426.8 595.4

SOU 3,933.6 5,195.6 4,146.3 5,399.1

SPPN 678.0 731.7 683.1 726.5

SPPS 1,908.5 2,197.0 1,952.0 2,287.2

TVA 1,633.0 1,868.4 1,675.8 1,972.9

UPNY 599.3 758.0 655.3 703.8

VACA 3,057.0 3,800.8 3,135.3 3,928.7

WUMS 625.4 748.5 632.9 732.9

National Total 46,213.0 57,228.2 47,325.9 57,259.8
Table A20 Capital Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

Capital Cost by Region

Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

AZNM 0.0 114.8 0.0 114.8

CALI 375.3 1287.1 454.1 1290.4

DSNY 0.0 0.7 0.0 73.3

ECAO 97.2 226.9 505.9 1164.9

ENTG 3.3 4.4 10.3 36.7

ERCT 0.9 978.4 0.6 1029.3

FRCC 13.3 455.4 25.2 540.3

LILC 54.0 167.9 62.4 143.9

MACE 4.2 22.1 4.2 33.8

MACS 18.2 134.0 94.7 261.9

MACW 0.0 0.3 80.9 162.8

MANO 2.7 21.6 35.4 71.3

MAPP 52.9 52.9 52.9 68.7

MECS 0.0 212.4 0.0 237.9

NENG 76.3 160.0 87.3 163.9

NWPE 0.0 23.0 0.0 23.0

NYC 0.0 103.9 0.0 137.1

PNW 5.5 183.8 5.5 182.2

RMPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

SOU 4.6 412.9 55.5 770.0

SPPN 5.3 28.0 5.3 51.0

SPPS 0.0 142.9 12.2 171.8

TVA 0.0 10.4 11.8 135.2

UPNY 0.0 4.1 11.6 23.2

VACA 232.6 647.5 221.1 667.1

WUMS 10.3 138.8 10.2 149.8

National Total 956.6 5,534.2 1,747.2 7,704.1