alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Byron Hudson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American Pallet
Leasing, Inc. ("registrant"):

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date:  November 21, 2005

/s/ Byron Hudson
------------------------------
Byron Hudson
Chief Financial Officer
0350

#### BURNETT DUBOSE COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. J. G. STARNES, Respondent.

(324 S. E. (2d) 651)

Court of Appeals

*James E. Parham, Jr.,*Columbia, *for appellant.*

*Arthur D. Rich,*of *Rich, Simons & Maxwell,*Aiken, *for respondent.*

Heard Oct. 15, 1984.

Decided Dec. 31, 1984.

Gardner, Judge:

This is a suit on account by Burnett Dubose Company, Inc., (plaintiff) against J. G. Starnes (Starnes) in which it is alleged that Starnes purchased from the plaintiff $24,457.77 of merchandise between January 2,1980, and September 5,1980, and that a carrying charge in the amount of $9,809.75 had *197accrued on the indebtedness as of November 25,1981. Starnes admitted the principal indebtedness but denied that there was an agreement to pay a carrying charge of 1 *%%*per month on all past due accounts. On motion for summary judgment, the trial judge entered judgment for Starnes as to the carrying charges, holding that there was no contract in writing between the parties for these charges. The trial judge found the account to be an account stated and allowed only the legal rate of interest per Section 34-31-20, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, as amended. We disagree and reverse.

The statutory interest rate on. accounts stated prescribed by Section 34-31-20 is applicable only in the absence of a written agreement between the parties fixing a different rate of interest. *Turner Coleman, Inc. v. Ohio Construction and Engineering, Inc.,*272 S. C. 289, 251 S. E. (2d) 738 (1979). In the instant case, there is of record a copy of an invoice dated March 31, 1980, which is signed by Starnes and contains this: “A service charge of *1V2%*(18% per annum) will be added on all past due *accounts.”*(Emphasis ours.) We hold that this is a written agreement between the parties, signed by Starnes, that Starnes will pay *V/2%*per month interest on all past due accounts owed by him to the plaintiff. For this reason, the judgment below is reversed.

Reversed.

Sanders, C. J., and Goolsby, J., concur.
Pima Cotton 2022

Planted Acres by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Acres

Not Estimated

< 15,000

15,000 - 29,999

30,000 +
EX-10.23(a)



 Exhibit 10.23(a) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE 
 WILLIAM LYON HOMES 2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”) to the William Lyon Homes 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”), is adopted by William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), as of April 25, 2013. 
 RECITALS 
 A. Pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Plan, the Plan shall be
administered by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) as designated by the Board. Section 4.2 of the Plan further authorizes the Board, at any time and from time
to time, to exercise any and all rights and duties of the Committee, subject to certain limitations. 
 B. Section 12.1 of
the Plan provides that, among other things, the administrator may amend the Plan as it shall deem advisable, subject to any requirement for stockholder approval imposed by applicable law. 

C. The Board desires to exercise its rights under Section 4.2 of the Plan to act as administrator and amend the Plan pursuant to the
authority set forth under Section 12.1 of the Plan. 
 AMENDMENT 

1. Subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders, Section 3.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety
to read as follows: 
 “(a) Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 12.2, a total of 30,000,000
Shares shall be authorized for issuance under the Plan.” 
 2. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise
defined shall have the same meanings assigned to them in the Plan. Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 

3. This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws, and not the
laws relating to conflicts or choice of laws, of the State of Delaware applicable to agreements made and to be performed wholly within the State of Delaware. 
 * * * * * 
 I hereby certify that this Amendment No. 1 was adopted by the
Board of Directors on April 19, 2013 and by the stockholders of the Company on April 25, 2013. 
 Executed this 25th
day of April, 2013. 
  

	
	WILLIAM LYON HOMES
	
	/S/    COLIN T. SEVERN
	 Colin T. Severn

	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary



  
 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 27, 2009 

l0324 

Order 

 

March 27, 2009 

137960 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137960 

 COA: 287608 

Wayne CC: 07-009514-FH 

JOHNNY LEE BROWN, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J. (concurring). 

I concur in the order denying leave to appeal. I write separately only to note that 

this Court has not addressed defendant’s argument regarding the imposition of costs and 

fees because it is not properly before the Court. However, defendant may raise the issue 

in a motion for relief from judgment under MCR 6.508.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                      ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

               Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of June 30, 2003

         The following list of subsidiaries of Advanced Lighting Technologies,
Inc. indicates the jurisdiction of organization except for entities incorporated
in the State of Ohio:

ADLT Realty Corp. I, Inc.
Advanced Lighting Technologies Australia, Inc.
Deposition Sciences, Inc.
Lighting Resources International, Inc.
Microsun Technologies, Inc.
Venture Lighting International, Inc.

Advanced Lighting Technologies Canada, Inc., organized in Ontario
Advanced Lighting Technologies Europe Limited, organized in the United Kingdom
Advanced Lighting Technologies (NZ) Ltd., organized in New Zealand
APL Engineered Materials, Inc., an Illinois corporation
APL Japan Company, Ltd., organized in Japan
Ballastronix, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Lighting Resources Holdings Limited, organized in Mauritius
Lighting Resources Private Limited, organized in India
Parry Power Systems Limited, organized in the United Kingdom
Venture Lighting Europe, Ltd., organized in the United Kingdom
Venture Lighting India Limited, organized in India
Venture Lighting International, FZE, organized in Dubai, UAE
Venture Lighting International, SA Pty, organized in South Africa
Venture Lighting Power Systems - North America, Inc., organized in Nova Scotia
Advanced Lighting Technologies Asia Pte, Ltd., organized in Singapore
Venture Power Systems Private Ltd., organized in India
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3807 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3807

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an incentive for 
  expanding employment in rural areas by allowing employers the work 
        opportunity credit for hiring residents of rural areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 14, 2009

Mr. Roe of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an incentive for 
  expanding employment in rural areas by allowing employers the work 
        opportunity credit for hiring residents of rural areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Economic Stimulus for Rural 
Communities Act''.

SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT TO APPLY TO NEW EMPLOYEES WHO ARE 
              RESIDENTS OF RURAL AREAS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining members of targeted groups) is amended 
by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (H), by striking the 
period at the end of subparagraph (I) and inserting ``, or'', and by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(J) a rural area resident.''
    (b) Rural Area Resident.--Subsection (d) of section 51 of such Code 
is amended by redesignating paragraphs (11) through (13) as paragraphs 
(12) through (14), respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (10) 
the following new paragraph:
            ``(11) Rural area resident.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `rural area resident' 
                means, with respect to any period, any employee of the 
                employer if--
                            ``(i) substantially all of the services 
                        performed during such period by such employee 
                        for such employer are performed within an area 
                        determined by the Secretary of Agriculture to 
                        be a rural area, and
                            ``(ii) the principal place of abode of such 
                        employee while performing such services is 
                        within such an area.
                    ``(B) Termination.--Such term shall not include any 
                individual who begins work for the employer after the 
                date which is 5 years after the date of the enactment 
                of this paragraph.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to individuals who begin work for the employer after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3615 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a standard home 

office deduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 

Mr. SCHRADER (for himself, Mr. NUNES, Mr. KIND, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. BRIGHT, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK of Arizona, Mrs. 

HALVORSON, Mr. MANZULLO, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. SCHAUER, 

Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. CARNEY, Mr. HALL of New 

York, Mr. HIMES, Ms. KOSMAS, Ms. MARKEY of Colorado, Mr. PAUL, 

Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. MINNICK, Mr. PERRIELLO, and Mr. NYE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 

Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a standard home office deduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Office Deduc5 tion Simplification Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3615 IH

1 SEC. 2. STANDARD DEDUCTION FOR BUSINESS USE OF 

2 HOME. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 280A of 

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to disallow5 ance of certain expenses in connection with business use 

6 of home, rental of vacation homes, etc.) is amended by 

7 adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(7) STANDARD HOME OFFICE DEDUCTION.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an indi10 vidual that is allowed a deduction for the use of 

11 a home office because of a use described in 

12 paragraphs (1), (2), or (4) of this subsection, 

13 notwithstanding the limitations of paragraph 

14 (5), if such individual elects the application of 

15 this paragraph for the taxable year, such indi16 vidual shall be allowed a deduction equal to the 

17 standard home office deduction for the taxable 

18 year in lieu of the deductions otherwise allow19 able under this chapter for such taxable year by 

20 reason of being attributed to such use. 

21 ‘‘(B) STANDARD HOME OFFICE DEDUC22 TION AMOUNT.—For purposes of this para23 graph, the standard home office deduction is 

24 the lesser of— 

25 ‘‘(i) $1,500, or 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3615 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) the gross income derived from 

2 the individual’s trade or business for which 

3 such use occurs. 

4 ‘‘(C) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

5 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

6 year after 2010, the dollar amount in subpara7 graph (B)(i) shall be increased by an amount 

8 equal to— 

9 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

10 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de11 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal12 endar year in which the taxable year be13 gins, determined by substituting ‘2009’ for 

14 ‘1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 

15 Any increase determined under the preceding 

16 sentence shall be rounded to the nearest mul17 tiple of $100.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Appendix 4. FOB Data for Weiner Study

Variable Label Type Comments

ANIMLnumerica

l

Animal Number character NA

SEX Sex character NA

DOSEGP Dose Group numerical Values presented are 

in mg/kg; Letter 

designates protocol 

under which data were 

collected

PHASE Day character NA

DAY Time of 

Observation

numerical 2 Hr (A);4 Hr (B);

4 Hr (C); 8 Hr (D);

2 Hr (F); 4 Hr (G);

8 Hr (H); 4 Hr (I)

TEST Behavior/ 

Observation

character

EASE_OF_HANDLING_IN_HAND

NA

0

Code

NA

NA

1= 0 VEHICLE (All Protocols)

2= 25 B-CYF.(A);10 L-CYH.(B); 500 RESM.(C);10 TEFL.(D);

12.5 B-CYF(F);350 RESM.(G);15 ESFENV. (H);-65 CYPER.(I) 

3= 45 B-CYF.(A);20 L-CYH.(B);750 RESM.(C);15 TEFL.(D);

150 S-BIO.(F);12.5 DELTA (G)

4= 200 S-BIO.(A);100 CYPER.(B);25 DELTA(C);25 ESFEN.

5= 300 S-BIO.(A);150 CYPER.(B);35 DELTA(C);50 ESFEN.(D)

6= 15 FENPRO.(A); 200 PERM.(B);400 PYR.(C);40 BIFEN.(D)

7= 30 FENPRO.(A);250 PERM.(B); 800 PYR.(C); 55 BIFEN.(D)

SEE SCORING 

CRITERIA FOR 

MORE INFORMATION

POSTURE

CONVULSIONS_-_TONIC

CHROMODACRYORRHEA

PALPEBRAL_CLOSURE

FECES_CONSISTENCY

EASE_OF_REMOVAL

LACRIMATION

CONVULSIONS_-_CLONIC

TREMORS

BITING
Variable Label Type Comments

TEST (cont.) Observation character

MUCOUS_MEMBRANES_-_color

TIME_TO_FIRST_STEP_(seconds)

BIZARRE/STEREOTYPIC_BEHAVIOR

EYES_-_color

SKIN_-_color

EYE_PROMINENCE

RESPIRATORY_characterACTER

RED_DEPOSITS_-_mouth

CRUSTY_DEPOSITS_-_eyes

CRUSTY_DEPOSITS_-_nose

CRUSTY_DEPOSITS_-_mouth

RED_DEPOSITS_-_eyes

RED_DEPOSITS_-_nose

MUSCLE_TONE

MOBILITY

GAIT

TREMORS

GAIT_SCORE

AROUSAL

CONVULSIONS_-_CLONIC

CONVULSIONS_-_TONIC

BACKING

REARING

GROOMING

URINATION

DEFECATION

TOUCH_RESPONSE

APPROACH_RESPONSE

STARTLE_RESPONSE

PUPIL_RESPONSE

EYEBLINK_RESPONSE

TAIL_PINCH_RESPONSE

OLFACTORY_ORIENTATION

PALPEBRAL_CLOSURE

RESPIRATORY_RATE

SEE SCORING 

CRITERIA FOR 

MORE INFORMATION

FUR_APPEARANCE

Code

SALIVATION

PILOERECTION
Variable Label Type Comments

TEST (cont.) Observation character

HINDLIMB_EXTENSOR_STRENGTH

GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_FORE_TRIAL_1

GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_FORE_TRIAL_2

GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_FORE_TRIAL_3

GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_FORE_MEAN

GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_HIND_TRIAL_1

GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_HIND_TRIAL_2

GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_HIND_TRIAL_3

GRIP_STRENGTH_(g)_-_FORE/HINDLIMB_HIND_MEAN

ROTAROD_PERFORMANCE_(seconds)

HINDLIMB_FOOTSPLAY_(mm)_TRIAL_1

HINDLIMB_FOOTSPLAY_(mm)_TRIAL_2

HINDLIMB_FOOTSPLAY_(mm)_MEAN

BODY_TEMPERATURE_(degrees_F)

RESULT Result numerical SEE SCORING 

CRITERIA FOR 

MORE INFORMATION

CATEGORY Test Category 

For Data 

Collection

numerical SEE SCORING 

CRITERIA FOR 

MORE INFORMATION

SUBCAT Type Of 

Observations

numerical SEE SCORING 

CRITERIA FOR 

MORE INFORMATION

Code

FORELIMB_EXTENSION

Code (1-18) or Numerical Value

HINDLIMB_EXTENSION

AIR_RIGHTING_REFLEX

CATALEPSY_(seconds)

BODY_WEIGHT_(g)

1 = FOB1 [tests 1a-1f & 2a]

2 = FOB2 [tests 2b-2o & 3a-m & 4a-j]

3 = FOB3 [tests 5a-d & 6a-c])

1= Home Cage

2= Handling

3= Open Field

4=Sensory
1

Denied and Opinion Filed August 22, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-00979-CV

EX PARTE TRACY NIXON, RELATOR

Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-00-14691-T

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang and Brown

Opinion by Justice Lang

Before the Court is relator Tracy Nixon’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. On the 

record before the Court, we cannot conclude relator is entitled to relief. The record filed by 

relator does not include sufficient proof that relator is currently confined or restrained. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(D), 52.7(a). Although the appendix to the petition includes the trial court’s 

order for issuance of capias and relator’s unsworn statement that he is confined, neither provide 

the proof of present confinement required by rule 52. See, e.g., In re Miller, 05-14-01023-CV, 

2014 WL 3882317, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 7, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) 

(denying petition and holding that website print out from Collin County Sheriff’s Department 

insufficient to provide proof of confinement).
2

Moreover, the petition does not provide the Court with a sufficient record under which 

the Court could properly review the contempt order. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is not 

certified as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, does not include a properly 

authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from the proceeding at which the relator was 

held in contempt, and is supported by documents that are not authenticated as required by the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1),(2), 52.3(j), 52.3(k)(1)(A).

Because the record in an original proceeding is assembled by the parties, this Court strictly 

enforces the authentication requirements of rule 52 to ensure the integrity of the record. 

It is relator’s burden as the party seeking relief to provide the Court with a sufficient 

record. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Because he has 

not done so here, we must deny the petition without prejudice to filing a properly supported 

petition.

/S/ Douglas Lang

DOUGLAS LANG

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
                     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Robert C. Howell, Chief Financial Officer of Organetix, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 15, 2005

/s/ Robert C. Howell
------------------------
Robert C. Howell
Chief Financial Officer