alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3717 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require a provider of a 

commercial mobile service or an IP-enabled voice service to provide call 

location information concerning the user of such a service to law enforcement agencies in order to respond to a call for emergency services 

or in an emergency situation that involves the risk of death or serious 

physical harm. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2009 

Mr. TIAHRT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require a 

provider of a commercial mobile service or an IP-enabled 

voice service to provide call location information concerning the user of such a service to law enforcement 

agencies in order to respond to a call for emergency 

services or in an emergency situation that involves the 

risk of death or serious physical harm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kelsey Smith Act’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3717 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRED DISCLOSURE OF CALL LOCATION INFOR2 MATION. 

3 Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

4 U.S.C. 201) is amended by inserting after section 222 the 

5 following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 222A. REQUIRED DISCLOSURE OF CALL LOCATION IN7 FORMATION. 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 222, at 

9 the request of a law enforcement agency, a telecommuni10 cations carrier shall provide call location information con11 cerning the user of a commercial mobile service (as such 

12 term is defined in section 332(d)) or the telecommuni13 cation device of the user of an IP-enabled voice service 

14 (as such term is defined in section 7 of the Wireless Com15 munications and Public Safety Act of 1999 (47 U.S.C. 

16 615b)) to a public safety answering point, emergency med17 ical service provider or emergency dispatch provider, pub18 lic safety, fire service, or law enforcement official, or hos19 pital emergency or trauma care facility, in order to re20 spond to the user’s call for emergency services or to re21 spond to an emergency situation that involves the risk of 

22 death or serious physical harm. 

23 ‘‘(b) HOLD HARMLESS.—No cause of action shall lie 

24 in any court against any provider of a commercial mobile 

25 service or an IP-enabled voice service, its officers, employ26 ees, or agents for providing call location information under 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3717 IH

1 subsection (a) while acting in good faith and in accordance 

2 with this section and any regulations promulgated pursu3 ant to this section. 

4 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—For the purpose of this section, 

5 the terms ‘customer proprietary network information’, 

6 ‘public safety answering point’, and ‘emergency services’ 

7 have the meanings for such terms as defined in section 

8 222.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3663 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3663

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to delay the date on 
which the accreditation requirement under the Medicare Program applies 
     to suppliers of durable medical equipment that are pharmacies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MEDICARE DME ACCREDITATION DEADLINE FOR CERTAIN 
              PHARMACIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1834(a)(20)(F)(i) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(20)(F)(i)) is amended by inserting before the 
semicolon the following: ``, except that the Secretary shall not 
require under this clause pharmacies to obtain such accreditation 
before January 1, 2010''.
    (b) Construction.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as 
affecting the application of an accreditation requirement for 
pharmacies to qualify for bidding in a competitive acquisition area 
under section 1847 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-3).

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3663

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to delay the date on 
which the accreditation requirement under the Medicare Program applies 
     to suppliers of durable medical equipment that are pharmacies.
```
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT TO

THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of March 11, 2013, by and between CVR ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and JOHN J. LIPINSKI (the “Executive”).

 

The Company and the Executive are parties to a Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”).  The parties hereto desire to amend the Employment Agreement as provided herein.

 

1.             Exclusivity.  The last sentence of Section 1.3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“The provisions of this Section 1.3 shall not be construed to prevent Executive from: (i) investing Executive’s personal, private assets as a passive investor in such form or manner as will not require any active services on the part of Executive in the management or operation of the affairs of the companies, partnerships, or other business entities in which any such passive investments are made; (ii) serving on the board of directors of one or more companies, provided such service does not conflict with the Executive’s duties and obligations to the Company and such service is approved by the chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company; or (iii) serving on the board of directors for Thumbs Up Enterprises Limited and its affiliated companies.”

 

2.             Ratify Agreement.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement will remain unamended and in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  The amendments provided herein will be limited precisely as drafted and will not constitute an amendment of any other term, condition or provision of the Agreement.

 

3.             Cross References.  References in the Agreement to “Agreement”, “hereof”, “herein”, and words of similar import are deemed to be a reference to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

 

4.             Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original and all of which constitute one agreement that is binding upon each of the parties, notwithstanding that all parties are not signatories to the same counterpart.

 

[signature page follows]

 











 

The parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

 

CVR ENERGY, INC.

 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   Stanley A. Riemann
    	
 
    	
/s/   John J. Lipinski
    
	
Name: Stanley A. Riemann
    	
 
    	
John   J. Lipinski
    
	
Title: Chief Operating Officer
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

[Signature Page for Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement]
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 
 Exhibit A 
 Performance Cash Award Notice 

 

					
	 A.     Participant:
	 	  
	 	
			
	 B.     Grant Date: 
	 	February 20, 2013	 	
			
	 C.     Performance Period:
	 	1/1/2013 through 12/31/2015	 	
			
	 D.     Aggregate Target Award Value: 
	 	  
	 	
			
	 E.     Performance Measures:
	 		 	

  

	 	1.	Relative Total Stockholder Return: L-3’s TSR compared to the returns of a comparison group of companies (see Appendix 1). “TSR” means, with
respect to a particular company for particular time period, the total stockholder return as reported by Bloomberg L.P. (or, if Bloomberg L.P. ceases to report such information, such other reporting service as shall be designated by the Committee).
This measure will be assessed by determining L-3’s relative percentile positioning on TSR versus companies included in the comparison group. 

 Portion of Aggregate Target Award Value for this Performance Measure: 100% 

Performance Scale: 
  

									
	 Performance
 Levels
	  	Relative
TSR	 	  	Award
Multiplier	 
	 Maximum
	  	 	> 74th percentile	  	  	 	200	% 
		  	 	63rd percentile	  	  	 	150	% 
	 Target
	  	 	50th percentile	  	  	 	100	% 
	 Threshold
	  	 	40th percentile	  	  	 	50	% 
	 Below Threshold
	  	 	< 40th percentile	  	  	 	0	% 

 In the event that the level of actual performance exceeds the Threshold and falls between two of the
stated performance levels listed above, the Award Multiplier will be calculated on a straight-line basis between the two stated Award Multipliers for those performance levels. 







 Appendix 1 
 The companies included for the Relative Total Stockholder Return assessment are those listed below. 
  

					
	 	  	 Company
	  	Ticker
	 1.
	  	ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC	  	ATK
	 2.
	  	BAE SYSTEMS PLC (ADR)	  	BAESY
	 3.
	  	CACI INTERNATIONAL INC	  	CACI
	 4.
	  	EXELIS INC	  	XLS
	 5.
	  	GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP	  	GD
	 6.
	  	HARRIS CORP	  	HRS
	 7.
	  	HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INC	  	HII
	 8.
	  	LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP	  	LMT
	 9.
	  	MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORP	  	MANT
	 10.
	  	NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP	  	NOC
	 11.
	  	RAYTHEON CO	  	RTN
	 12.
	  	ROCKWELL COLLINS INC	  	COL
	 13.
	  	SAIC	  	SAI
	 14.
	  	TEXTRON INC	  	TXT
	 15.
	  	URS CORP	  	URS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Federal Maritime Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

April 13, 2015; 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

800 N. Capitol Street NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

The first portion of the meeting will be held in Open Session; the second in Closed Session.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Closed Session

1. Staff Report on Rules, Rates, and Practices Relating to Detention, Demurrage, and Free Time for Containerized Imports and Exports Moving Through Selected U.S. Ports

2. Discussion on Congestion at U.S. Ports and Major Carrier Alliances Presented by Commissioner Khouri

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-08184 Filed 4-6-15; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3768 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain untwisted filament 

yarns. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

untwisted filament yarns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN UNTWISTED FILAMENT YARNS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.91 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain untwisted filament yarns) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3768 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                        1,705
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                76,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                  4,996
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             86,611
<PP&E>                                       13,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                4,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               97,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        42,141
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                  12,836
<COMMON>                                         24
<OTHER-SE>                                   25,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 97,189
<SALES>                                     121,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            121,237
<CGS>                                        90,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                90,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (6)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (1,994)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (4,695)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (4,695)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.21)



</TABLE>
#### Peter Barnes, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

The verdict being sustained *by the*evidence, the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

New trial. ' Before Judge'Hopkins. Fulton Superior Court. October Term, 1873.

A report of this case is unnecessary.

Thrasher & Thrasher, for plaintiff in error.

John T. Glenn, solicitor general, for the state.

*144Warner, Chief Justice.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of burglary in the night, and on the trial was found guilty by the jury. A motion was made for a new trial, which was overruled, and the defendant excepted. The only grounds for a new trial insisted on here are that the verdict was contrary to law, that the verdict was contrary to Che evidence, and without evidence to support it. In looking through the evidence contained in the record, we find that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict under the law, therefore the verdict was not contrary to law, nor contrary to the evidence, or without evidence to support it. ' The twelve jurors who passed on the facts, as proved by the witnesses on the trial, were quite as competent to do so as this court, and in contemplation of the law, better qualified to do so. ■ *

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                         Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Rudy 45 (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the periods ending October 31, 2004,  January 31, 2005 and April
30,  2005,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof (the "Report"),  I, Pearl Asencio,  Principal  Accounting  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  to the best of my  knowledge,  pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            i.    The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            ii.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Rudy 45 and will
be retained by Rudy 45 and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.

Dated:  November 11, 2005

                                             /S/ PEARL ASENCIO
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name:  Pearl Asencio
                                             Title: Principal Accounting Officer
Soybeans 2022

Harvested Acres by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Acres

Not Estimated

< 10,000

10,000 - 24,999

25,000 - 49,999

50,000 - 99,999

100,000 - 149,999

150,000 +
0 !NAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTAAliED

PR 20-0004

IN RE PETITION OF DAVID M. BEATON FOR

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN

THE BAR OF MONTANA

APR 14 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

0 R r5T1V i‘liontan

David M. Beaton has petitioned this Court for reinstatement to active status in the

State Bar of Montana. Beaton voluntarily chose inactive status on April 9, 2010, and has

been inactive since then. Therefore, given the length of time Beaton has been on inactive

status,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner shall submit to an investigation by the

Commission on Character and Fitness. Petitioner shall comply with the character and

fitness process and timely produce information and documentation as requested by the

Commission. The Commission will investigate Petitioner's character and fitness in

accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the Commission on Character and Fitness. The

Commission may, in its discretion, conduct a limited investigation. The Commission will

advise the Court whether the Petitioner has been certified, conditionally certified, or denied

certification. If the Commission denies certification, the Commission will issue written

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a decision pursuant to Section 5(c)(6) of the Rules

of Procedure of the Commission on Character and Fitness. If the Petitioner is certified or

conditionally certified by the Commission on Character and Fitness, the Petitioner shall be

admitted to the active practice of law in Montana upon payment of appropriate dues and

fees and penalties to the State Bar of Montana.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if admitted, within six months of admission to

the active practice of law, Petitioner shall submit to the Board of Continuing Legal

Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, MT 59624, proof of attendance at thirty hours of

approved Continuing Legal Education to be credited to the time Petitioner was on inactive

status.

04/14/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0004
The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this I LI day of April, 2020.

Chief Justice

•

2

L licef4j1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 22, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 22, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0164. KENTARA BERNARD v. DUANE BERNARD.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2015265358
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19632-19633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08456]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1969]

Expansion of Subzone 116B; Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, 
Inc., Port Arthur and Jefferson County, Texas

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite

[[Page 19633]]

and encourage foreign commerce, and for other purposes,'' and 
authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant to qualified 
corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or 
adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR part 400) provide for the 
establishment of subzones for specific uses;
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zone of Southeast Texas, Inc., grantee 
of Foreign-Trade Zone 116, has made application to the Board to expand 
Subzone 116B on behalf of Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc., to 
include as Site 5 a pipeline that extends from the subzone's Site 4 in 
Nederland to Site 1 in Port Arthur, Texas (FTZ Docket B-85-2014, 
docketed 11-25-2014);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (79 FR 71831, 12-02-2014) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's memorandum, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby approves the expansion of Subzone 
116B on behalf of Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc., as 
described in the application and Federal Register notice, subject to 
the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of April 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08456 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```