alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Green  Clover  Luck
Corporation.,  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Daniel L. Hodges, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: September 4, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08293]



[[Page 19328]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center For Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Academic Research Enhancement: Healthcare Delivery and 
Methodologies.
    Date: May 7, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: JW Marriott New Orleans, 614 Canal Street, New Orleans, 
LA 70130.
    Contact Person: Rebecca Henry, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3158, MSC 7770, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
1717, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbd3ded5c9c2c9c9fbd6dad2d795d5d2d395dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f39b969d818a8181b39e929a9fdd9d9a9bdd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; PAR13-132: Understanding and Promoting Health Literacy.
    Date: May 8, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: JW Marriot New Orleans, 614 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 
70130.
    Contact Person: Rebecca Henry, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3158, MSC 7770, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
1717, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#563e3338242f2424163b373f3a78383f3e78313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="355d505b474c47477558545c591b5b5c5d1b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 7, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-08293 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 10.1



EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



September 24, 2004



VIA FACSIMILE and MAIL



Dr. David C. Collins

2814 Motor Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90064



Dear David:



As we discussed, I informed the Compensation Committee that you had told me
that you wanted to exercise your option under Section 3 of your employment agreement to extend the term of your employment for three years. Under the circumstances, the Committee has decided to waive any requirement that your notice be in writing,
and accordingly the term of your employment agreement is now extended until September 30, 2007.



Very truly yours,/s/    THEODORE E.
GUTHTheodore E. Guth




TEG:lh

cc: W. Mathew Juechter
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Jeffrey Williams, Chief Financial Officer of eGene. Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report (the "Quarterly Report") on
Form 10-QSB of the Company.

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report.

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly
Report.

     4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

          a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is
being prepared;

          b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and

          c)   Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.

     5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company's auditors and the Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated: May 11, 2005            By: /s/ Jeffrey Williams
                                   Jeffrey Williams
                                   Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applebee's  International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended June 29, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and dates indicated  below,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended and (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: July 30, 2003                By: /s/ Lloyd L. Hill
    ---------------------             ---------------------------------------
                                      Lloyd L. Hill
                                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applebee's  International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended June 29, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and dates indicated  below,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: July 30, 2003                By: /s/ Steven K. Lumpkin
    ---------------------            ----------------------------------------
                                     Steven K. Lumpkin
                                     Chief Financial Officer
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact:  Carol DiRaimo,
          Vice President of Investor Relations
          (913) 967-4109

           Applebee's International Reports February Comparable Sales

OVERLAND  PARK,  KAN.,  February  21,  2006 --  Applebee's  International,  Inc.
(Nasdaq:APPB)  today reported  comparable  sales for the four-week  period ended
February 19, 2006.

System-wide  domestic  comparable  sales  increased 0.1 percent for the February
period,  and comparable sales for domestic franchise  restaurants  increased 0.7
percent.  Comparable  sales  for  company  restaurants  decreased  1.5  percent,
reflecting a decrease in guest traffic of  approximately  5.0 percent,  combined
with a higher average check.  The negative  impact of more severe winter weather
this year on February  comparable  sales is  estimated to be  approximately  3.0
percent for company restaurants,  1.0 to 1.5 percent for franchise  restaurants,
and 1.5 to 2.0 percent system-wide.

System-wide  comparable  sales for the  quarter-to-date  period through February
(eight weeks) have increased 3.2 percent,  with company and franchise restaurant
comparable sales up 1.8 percent and 3.6 percent, respectively.

Applebee's International,  Inc., headquartered in Overland Park, Kan., develops,
franchises and operates  restaurants under the Applebee's  Neighborhood  Grill &
Bar brand,  the largest casual dining  concept in the world.  As of February 19,
2006, there were 1,817 Applebee's restaurants operating system-wide in 49 states
and  15   international   countries.   Additional   information   on  Applebee's
International can be found at the company's website (www.applebees.com).

                                      # # #
(491D-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration )4 CFR Part 39 

### 2-.010 

## -0 2-2-

## C) [Docket No. FAA-lOO9-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-llS-AD] R1N 212D-AA64 Ainvorthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400. -401, and -402 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: Wepropose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing amvorthiness information (MeAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: Certain main landing gear components have experienced premature failure during certification testing. Revision has been made to the DHC-8-400 Maintenance Requirements Manual, Airworthiness Limitation Items, to incorporate the revised safe life limits forthe main landing gear lock actuator assembly, retraction actuator assembly rod end and piston, and the upper bearing inthe main landing gear shock strut assembly. Failure ofthese components could adversely affect the structural integrity ofthe main landing gear. 

### . 

## ~, uTING SVMIIOL

AN/I\- 10 I

UflNGSYMOO

OUHN(iSVMBOl

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe conditio ATE described inthe MeAl. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [insert date 4S days aller date ofpublication intbe FEDERAL REGISTER]. SYMBOLDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR ParI 39 (4910-t3-P] ror<cu U<C'S ItOUfl>lG'V""",- ANE-171 

# .~ CYaies 

### II. ANE-171 [Docket No. FAA-2009_xx***; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-l IS-ADI RIN 2120-AA64 ANE-171 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400, -401, and -402 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ,~(lSVMIlOL ANE-170

" INOS "00. llQUlllCSV....:ll. LGB-AEG listed above. This proposed AD results frommandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MCAI) originated byan aviation authority ofanothcr country to identify ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM).

and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe SUMMARY: Wepropose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) fortheproducts

condition as: Certain main landing gear components have experienced premature failure during certification testing. Revision has been made to the DHC-8AOO Maintenance Requirements Manual, Airworthiness Limitation Items, to incorporate therevised safe lifelimits forthemain landing gear lock actuator assembly, retraction actuator assembly rod end and piston, and the upper bearing inthe main landing gear shock strut assembly. Failure ofthese components could adversely affect the structural integrity ofthe main landing gear. RO\JlINC SYMUOI.

'N'TIAlSl>H"

The proposed AD would require actions thatare intended to address the unsafe condition 

### ,.,,"~ described inthe MCAL DATES: We must receive comment') onthis proposed AD by [insert date 45 days after date ofpublication inthe FEDERAL REGISTER].
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    Exhibit 4.48

   SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT ON PROCUREMENT OF TELKOM-2 SATELLITE NO.K.TEL
                   66/HK.920/UTA-00/2004, DATED 31 MARCH 2004

<TABLE>
<S>                     <C>
Parties:                1.  TELKOM; and

                        2.  Orbital Sciences Corporation ("CONTRACTOR").

Preceding Agreements:   1.  Main agreement - No.K.TEL.191/HK.810/UTA-00/2002
                            dated 24 October 2002;

                        2.  Amendment No. 1 - No.K.TEL.260/HK.820/UTA-00/2003
                            dated 15 December 2003.

Amended Provisions:     1.  The parties agree to change some provisions
                            regarding satellite performance specification,
                            communication subsystem performance specification,
                            BUS subsystem performance specification, AMCS
                            performance specification and ground system price
                            breakdown;

                        2.  The parties agree that the changes do not effect
                            the price or delivery requirements.
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50111

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALEJANDRO DE LOS SANTOS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:08-CR-467-1

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alejandro De Los Santos, federal prisoner # 19024-280, appeals the 

denial of an “Agreed Motion for a Sentence Reduction,” under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2), relative to the sentence he received following his conviction for of 

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with 

intent to distribute marijuana. De Los Santos based his motion on Amendment 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50111 Document: 00513786265 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2016
No. 16-50111

2

782 to the Guidelines, which had the effect of retroactively lowering most drugrelated base offense levels by two levels.

De Los Santos asserts that the district court improperly relied entirely 

on its determination that he had perjured himself at trial and did not consider 

that De Los Santos had already received a sentencing enhancement for 

obstruction of justice and also failed to satisfy its obligation to review anew the 

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. De Los Santos contends that the § 3553(a) factors 

support granting his motion, particularly because as a first-time non-violent 

offender, he poses no danger to public.

We review De Los Santos’s arguments for plain error, as he did not 

present them to the district court. See United States v. Jones, 596 F.3d 273, 

276 (5th Cir. 2010). De Los Santos has not shown error. The court correctly 

recognized that he was eligible for a reduction; however, it denied the motion 

as a matter of discretion, noting that De Los Santos had a serious jury trial at 

which he gave perjured testimony, which was appropriate for the court to 

consider in denying the motion. See Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 826-

27 (2010); 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1). Also, the district court had before it De Los 

Santos’s arguments in favor of a sentence reduction and gave due consideration 

to the § 3582(c)(2) motion. See United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1010 

(5th Cir. 1995).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-50111 Document: 00513786265 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2016
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6499

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MAURICIO LOPEZ HOWELL, a/k/a LoBo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CR-94-56, CA-00-296-5-H)

Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mauricio Lopez Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Jane J. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mauricio Lopez Howell seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See Jones v.

Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751 (1983); United States v. Fisher, 58 F.3d

96, 100 (4th Cir. 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 07, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0195. JONES LANG LASALLE OPERATIONS, LLC et al. v. DAN JOHNSON.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16EV002713
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Edmonds, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 814]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered June 27, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea *204of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 51⁄2 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion without a hearing. In response to defendant’s allegation that he was lawfully minding his business and that his arrest “without a warrant” lacked probable cause, the People submitted proof that at the time of defendant’s arrest there had existed an outstanding warrant for his arrest for violation of parole. Additionally, both the felony complaint and the voluntary disclosure form clearly stated that all the officers involved in the arrest were from the Warrant Section. In view of this information, defendant’s failure to controvert that he was apprehended pursuant to the outstanding warrant resulted in a failure to allege a legal ground for suppression, or to raise a factual issue requiring a hearing *(see*CPL 710.60 [3]; *People v Mendoza,*82 NY2d 415 [1993]; *People v Howell, 2*AD3d 258 [2003]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 137 (Monday, July 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 42119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18205]

[[Page 42119]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday, August 19, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-18205 Filed 7-14-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```