alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1797

CHUKWUJINDU VICTOR MBAKPUO,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States; 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: March 4, 2011 Decided: March 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Liam Ge, Columbia, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West,

Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Assistant 

Director, Francis W. Fraser, Office of Immigration Litigation, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chukwujindu Victor Mbakpuo, a native and citizen of 

Nigeria, petitions for review an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the 

immigration judge’s orders denying his application for 

cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) (2006), the

application for voluntary departure and his motion to 

reconsider. We dismiss the petition for review.

In an appeal of an administrative decision to grant or 

deny cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229b(b), this 

court has jurisdiction only over constitutional claims and 

questions of law. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (D) (2006); see

Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 479-80 (4th Cir. 2006) (holding 

that, under § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (D), court has no jurisdiction 

over any aspects of denial of relief under § 1229b except 

constitutional claims or questions of law); Obioha v. Gonzales, 

431 F.3d 400, 405 (4th Cir. 2005) (“It is quite clear that the 

gatekeeper provision bars our jurisdiction to review a decision 

of the B[oard] to actually deny a petition for cancellation of 

removal or the other enumerated forms of discretionary 

relief.”). Mbakpuo’s application was denied as a matter of 

discretion and because he failed to show his removal would be an 

exceptional and extreme hardship to his United States born 

children. We conclude that Mbakpuo has failed to identify any 
3

substantive error of law or constitutional claim regarding the 

discretionary denial of relief. Thus, we do not have 

jurisdiction to review the order. 

With regard to voluntary departure, this court does 

not have jurisdiction to review the denial of an order for 

voluntary departure, except for claims involving a 

constitutional error or an error of law. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1229c(f)(2006); Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 193 (4th 

Cir. 2004). Mbakpuo has failed to identify any such error. 

Therefore, we dismiss the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
# Vermont TAG meets with President of State Partner Senegal

/ Published Dec. 16, 2022

WASHINGTON - A Vermont National Guard delegation met with the president of Senegal and the African Union in Washington Dec. 12.

Maj. Gen. Gregory Knight, adjutant general of Vermont, sat down with Senegal President Macky Sall, who was attending the U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit, to discuss the almost 15-year partnership between Vermont and Senegal. Sall also heads the African Union.

“The partnership with Senegal is as strong as ever. It was truly an honor to sit down and chat with President Sall about all the great things we have done together and all the great things on the horizon,” Knight said. “There is so much we can offer each other.”

Sall praised the partnership, citing efforts to develop a tactical training center in Thies and domestic emergency management response, including the physical security and stockpile management program.

The president said he was optimistic about increased multilateral opportunities with the Vermont Guard’s other partner countries, North Macedonia and Austria.

Knight and Sall also discussed a medical readiness exercise scheduled early next year, when Vermont  Guardsmen and Senegalese medical professionals will provide care in military and civilian clinics and hospitals. 

Vermont has sent personnel to Senegal several times since the signing of the State Partnership Agreement in 2008. 

Knight expressed enthusiasm about expanding the relationship beyond military cooperation and fostering civilian-to-civilian relationships.

“The goal is a whole-of-society partnership. The connections and the opportunities to learn from each other are where we have seen incredible value on the military side,” Knight said. “Expanding this partnership to the civilian world would maximize the benefits of the State Partnership Program for both Vermont and Senegal.”

The State Partnership Program, administered by the National Guard Bureau, is an innovative, cost-effective security cooperation program that connects the National Guard with the militaries of partner nations. Vermont has paired with North Macedonia since 1993, Senegal since 2008, and Austria since 2021.
PUERTO RICO ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (PRARNG) DRINKING 

WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at Fort 

Allen, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army National Guardprovided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), a 

federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the American public. 

The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to ensure the EPA HA 

or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: June 2021

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect

Future Testing Event: September 2021

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Puerto Rico National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 787-289-1400

Office E-mail Address: ng.pr.prarng.mbx.ngpr-pao@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128780 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver (64) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, RICHARD G. SMITH, JR., Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 128780 

 COA: 251773 
 Bay CC: 03-003286-CZ

DOUGLAS C. SMITH, Individually, as Trustee, 

and as Personal Representative of the Estate of 

Joyce Smith, SARAH J. SMITH-LUBARSKY, 

CARL H. SMITH, III, ESTATE OF RICHARD

G. SMITH, SR., RICHARD G. SMITH 

REVOCABLE TRUST, JOYCE SMITH 

REVOCABLE TRUST, THRUSHWOODSMITH FAMILY JOINT TRUST, WEE 

HOUSE-SMITH FAMILY JOINT TRUST, 

ALBERT C. HICKS, and SMITH & BROOKER, 

P.C., 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of 

December 27, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the 

order was entered erroneously. 

CAVANAGH, J., not participating. 

l0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KAVIN M AURIC E R

HODES, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. R . SAILER ; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-55989 D.C . No. 2:08-c v-06419-DDPDTB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia De a n D. Pre ge rson, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 22, 2014 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, C ANB Y, a nd C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s . C a lifornia sta te prisone r Kavin M a

uric e R hode s a ppe a l s pro sefrom

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt on theple a dings in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging de libe rat e indiffe re nc e to his serious m e dic a l ne e ds. W e re vie w de novo. Ow e ns v . K aise r Found. He a lth Plan, Inc
. , 244 F.3d 708, 713 (9th C ir. 2001). W e a ffirm . 

# FIL ED JUL 30 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d R

hode s’ s a c tion be c a

use R hode s fa ile d to a l le ge fa c ts suffic ie nt to show tha t de fe nda nts we re de libe rate ly

indiffe re nt to his ha nd injury . Se eJ

e t t v . Pe nne r , 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th C ir. 2006) (to de m onstra

te de libe rate indiffe re nc e , the prisone r m ust show “ a

purpose ful a c t or fa ilure to re spond to a

prisone r’ s pa in or possible m e d ic a l ne e d ” and “ ha

rm c a use d by the indiffe re nc e ” ); c

f. K e e n a n v . Hall , 83 F.3d 1083, 1092 (9th C ir. 1996) (“ [V] e rba l ha

ra ssm e nt ge ne ra lly

doe s not viola

te the Eighth Ame ndm e nt.” ). The distric t c ourt did not a buse its discre tion by

de c lining to exe rc i se supple m e nta l jurisdic tion over R hode s’ s sta

te la w c la im s. Se eOv ev . Gw i nn , 264 F.3d 817, 821, 826 (9th C ir. 2001) (se tting forth sta nda rd of re vie w a

nd e xpla ining that “ [a ] c ourt m a

y de c lineto e xe rc ise supple m e nta l jurisdic t ion ove r re late d sta te la w c la im s onc e it ha s dismisse d a ll c la im s ove r whic h it ha s original jurisdic tion” (c ita tion a nd inte rna l quota

tion m arks omitte d)). AFFIRM E D.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2999 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services, any officer or 

employee of the Department of Health and Human Services, and States 

from requiring COVID–19 vaccination as a condition of eligibility for 

benefits or assistance under the Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2021 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

any officer or employee of the Department of Health 

and Human Services, and States from requiring COVID– 

19 vaccination as a condition of eligibility for benefits 

or assistance under the Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP 

programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2999 IS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING COVID–19 VAC2 CINATION AS A CONDITION OF ELIGIBILITY 

3 FOR BENEFITS OR ASSISTANCE UNDER THE 

4 MEDICARE, MEDICAID, OR CHIP PROGRAMS. 

5 Neither the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

6 nor any officer or employee of the Department of Health 

7 and Human Services (or, if applicable, the chief executive 

8 officer of a State or any officer or employee of a State 

9 or a State Medicaid or CHIP agency) shall establish or 

10 enforce any requirement that an individual receive a 

11 COVID–19 vaccine as a condition of the individual receiv12 ing benefits or assistance under any of the following pro13 grams: 

14 (1) The Medicare program under title XVIII of 

15 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.). 

16 (2) The Medicaid program under title XIX of 

17 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.). 

18 (3) The Children’s Health Insurance Program 

19 under title XXI of the Social Security Act (42 

20 U.S.C. 1397aa et seq.). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Bell,TierenyFrom:Sent:HaroldPeterson<harold.peterson2@gmail.com>Tuesday,June23,201511:41AMTo:Bell,TierenySubject:Fwd:MaildeliveryfailedThecommentonthisbouncedemailhasalreadyclosed.Iampastingmycommentbelowthissentenceandabovethebouncemessageinthehopeitwillstillbereceived.Regards,-HaroldMynameisHaroldPeterson,andIamanenvironmentalscientistspecializinginairpollution,particularlyozone,nitrogenoxides,andparticulatematter.Iamwritingtosupportthisdocketaswritten.SinceallsitesintheKnoxvilleareaaremeasuringvaluesbelow0.075ppmitisclearthemetro areaisinattainmentofthe20088-hourozonestandard.IamsomewhatsuspiciousofthelargeprojecteddecreasesinNOxfromroadsources,giventhatvehicletrafficwillalmostcertainlybeincreasingthroughoutthemodeledtimeperiod.Itseemslikelythatsmaller(andinmymindmoreprobable)reductionsinNOxfromroadsources,andhencefromallsourcessincetheprimarytotalreductionisfromroadsources,willstillresultincontinuedattainmentoftheozonestandardgiventhatcurrentNOxemissionsareresultinginozoneattainment.Ihavenofurthercommentsregardingthisdocket.Sincerely,HaroldPeterson----------Forwardedmessage----------From:MailDeliverySystem<MAILER-DAEMON@genkdca-smmi05.gseg.att.com>Date:Sat,Jun6,2015at5:02PMSubject:MaildeliveryfailedTo:harold.peterson2@gmail.comThismessagewascreatedautomaticallybymaildeliverysoftware.Amessagethatyouhavesentcouldnotbedeliveredtooneormorerecipients.Thisisapermanenterror.Thefollowingaddressfailed:<r4-arms@epa.gov>:5505.1.1<R4-ARMS@epa.gov>:Recipientaddressrejected:UserunknowninrelayrecipienttableIncludedisacopyofthemessageheader:Received:fromunknown[209.85.220.182](EHLOmail-gk0-fl82.google.com)bygenkdca-smmiOS.gseg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.1-0)overTLSsecuredchannelwithESMTPidedd63755.0.1565816.00-442.2989863.genkdca-smmi05.gseg.att.com(envelope-from<harold.peterson2@gmaiI.com>);1Sat,06Jun201522:02:06+0000(UTC)Received:byqkhq76withSMTPidq76so58752083qkh.2for<R4-ARMS@epa.gov>;Sat,06Jun201515:02:06-0700(PDT)DKIM-Signature:v=l;a=rsa-sha256;c=relaxed/relaxed;d=gmail.com;s=20120113;h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;bh=HD3wEJ8Rt6YQqglSW9oVWcPygdohwnCoes4Qid5aLAw=;b=xYLG1bJhY5tFjzuYDi0UeyhDHJtKOIQfWKVRtes82HBJUhLYSPKhqprOZLb2qRVTcOnXtXdiEvQ8Q1zAKA1h9plp+XDQRiXifrBStMZBQTz+UuSZpPxdPJ7rw9ewg8p6TPqKOIQzzE9aBJsyYt8uiXtLMByEGgS7/J1dhntle615WOXLbWgf02u2f6jtSfXvAxHuGkDf+wZHJ3bo9tOwvVwlVdVb78DjMO/bpBC03kcvAkk2LfUZc9YsOw51nTHg9gOIKGnNY3RVWCFmapiSCLqA7HpC8yZ+QH6RELqw4PDcbevZ80ipbaRvfin6UlwzPCxHIK8rEUmPn1rYQMyyeAgMIME-Version:1.0X-Received:by10.55.20.17withSMTPide17mr18758811qkh.I02.1433628126224;Sat,06Jun201515:02:06-0700(PDT)Received:by10.96.156.134withHTTP;Sat,6Jun201515:02:06-0700(PDT)Date:Sat,6Jun201517:02:06-0500Message-10:<CAM2jOQqNhGTfSBPyVplZOrQu2RHDrP08cs02yhKdyV8VnndLQ@mail.gmail.com>SubjectDocket10No.EPA-R04-0AR-2014-0870From:HaroldPeterson<harold.peterson2@grnail.com>To:R4-ARMS<R4-ARMS@cpa.gov>Content-Type:multipart/alternative;boundary=OO1a1144d2683425c00517e08f982
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Bureau of Labor Statistics

The Bureau of Labor Statistics Data Users Advisory Committee will meet on Tuesday June 9, 2015. The meeting will be held in the Postal Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC.

The Committee provides advice to the Bureau of Labor Statistics from the points of view of data users from various sectors of the U.S. economy, including the labor, business, research, academic, and government communities, on technical matters related to the collection, analysis, dissemination, and use of the Bureau's statistics, on its published reports, and on the broader aspects of its overall mission and function.

The meeting will be held in Meeting Rooms 1, 2, and 3 of the Postal Square Building Conference Center. The schedule and agenda for the meeting are as follows:

8:30 a.m. Registration

9:00 a.m. Commissioner's welcome and review of agency developments

9:45 a.m. Ethics Briefing

10:15 a.m. New Data Products in OEUS

11:15 a.m. Occupational Requirements Survey status and outputs

1:15 p.m. Chart packages with news releases

1:45 p.m. K-12 pages

2:30 p.m. New inputs to PPI industry indexes

3:45 p.m. Report on Stakeholders Surveys

4:45 p.m. Future topics and meeting wrap-up

The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the meeting should be directed to Kathy Mele, Data Users Advisory Committee, on 202.691.6102. Individuals who require special accommodations should contact Ms. Mele at least two days prior to the meeting date.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of April 2015.

Kimberly D. Hill,

Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

[FR Doc. 2015-08378 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
EXHIBIT 32.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael A. Knox, the Chief Financial Officer of Resolve  Staffing,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A  of the  Company  for the  fiscal
      quarter ended  September 30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


Dated: November 19, 2004



                                         _/s/ Michael A. Knox
                                         ------------------------------
                                         Name: Michael A. Knox
                                         Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08209]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Availability of Funds and Funding Opportunity 
Announcement for YouthBuild

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA). Funding Opportunity 
Number: FOA-ETA-15-05

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration (ETA), U.S. 
Department of Labor (DOL or Department), announces the availability of 
approximately $76 million in grant funds authorized by the YouthBuild 
provisions of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) (Pub. 
L. 113-128). DOL will award grants through a competitive process to 
organizations to oversee the provision of education, occupational 
skills training, and employment services to disadvantaged youth in 
their communities while performing meaningful work and service to their 
communities. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2015, DOL hopes to serve approximately 
4,950 participants during the grant period of performance, with 
approximately 76 projects awarded across the country. Individual grants 
will range from $700,000 to $1.1 million and require an exact 25 
percent match from applicants, using sources other than federal 
funding. The grant period of performance for this FOA is 40 months, 
including a four-month planning period.
    The complete FOA and any subsequent FOA amendments in connection 
with this solicitation are described in further detail on ETA's Web 
site at http://www.doleta.gov/grants/ or on http://www.grants.gov. The 
Web sites provide application information, eligibility requirements, 
review and selection procedures, and other program requirements 
governing this solicitation.

DATES: The closing date for receipt of applications under this 
announcement is June 5, 2015. Applications must be received no later 
than 4:00:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kia Mason, 200 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Room N-4716, Washington, DC 20210; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff929e8c9091d194969ebf9b9093d1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cea3afbda1a0e0a5a7af8eaaa1a2e0a9a1b8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Grant Officer for this FOA is Steven A. Rietzke.

    Signed April 6, 2015 in Washington, DC.
Eric D. Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer/Division Chief, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-08209 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>