alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3801 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3801

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the increased 
first-time homebuyer credit and waiver of requirement to repay, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 13, 2009

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the increased 
first-time homebuyer credit and waiver of requirement to repay, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First-Time Homebuyer Credit 
Continuation Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (h) of section 36 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 1, 2009'' and 
inserting ``December 1, 2010''.
    (b) Extension of Waiver of Recapture Subparagraph.--Subparagraph 
(D) of section 36(f)(4) of such Code is amended by striking ``December 
1, 2009'' and inserting ``December 1, 2010''.
    (c) Election To Treat Purchase in Prior Year.--Subsection (g) of 
section 36 of such Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``December 1, 2009'' and inserting 
        ``January 1, 2010'', and
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``In the case of 
        such a purchase after December 31, 2009, and before December 1, 
        2010, a taxpayer may elect to treat such purchase as made on 
        December 31, 2009, for purposes of this section (other than the 
        preceding sentence and subsections (c) and (f)(4)(D)).''.
    (d) Coordination With Similar District of Columbia Credit.--
Paragraph (4) of section 1400C(e) of such Code is amended by striking 
``December 1, 2009'' and inserting ``January 1, 2010''.
    (e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to residences purchased after November 30, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3767 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

170 North Main Street in Smithfield, Utah, as the ‘‘W. Hazen Hillyard 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 170 North Main Street in Smithfield, Utah, 

as the ‘‘W. Hazen Hillyard Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. W. HAZEN HILLYARD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 170 North Main Street in Smith6 field, Utah, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘W. 

7 Hazen Hillyard Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3767 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘W. Hazen Hillyard 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold a meeting on April 22, 2015, 10:00 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

*Portion open to the public:*

(1) Executive Committee Reports

The person to contact for more information is Martha P. Rico, Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

Dated: April 6, 2015.

Martha P. Rico,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-08143 Filed 4-6-15; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3704 

To authorize a Department of Veterans Affairs major medical facility lease 

in Atlanta, Georgia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2009 

Mr. DEAL of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize a Department of Veterans Affairs major 

medical facility lease in Atlanta, Georgia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY 

4 LEASE, ATLANTA, GEORGIA. 

5 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may carry out a 

6 major medical facility lease for a Specialty Care Clinic in 

7 Atlanta, Georgia, in an amount not to exceed $5,172,000. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1850, as adopted pursuant to Section 9096 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct, I, Grant Miller, certify that:

 

To the best ofmy knowledge and belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2003 by USA Broadband, Inc.and to which this certification is appended fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the informationcontained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of USA Broadband, Inc.

 
| /s/ GRANT  MILLER        |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

1

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

ROBERT T. MCALLISTER, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

No. 12-1387 

(D.C. No. 1:11-CR-00283-PAB-1) 

(D. Colo.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, KELLY and HARTZ, Circuit Judges. 

 

 This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the 

appeal waiver contained in defendant Robert T. McAllister’s plea agreement. The 

defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of fraud. Pursuant to the plea agreement, 

McAllister waived his right to appeal his conviction or sentence, provided the 

sentence was within the statutory maximum authorized by law and did not upwardly 

 

* This panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the 

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The 

case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment 

is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, 

and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent 

with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

December 5, 2012

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
- 2 - 

depart from the sentencing guideline range. The district court sentenced McAllister 

to 78 months’ imprisonment, the low end of the guideline range. Nevertheless, 

McAllister filed a notice of appeal. 

 The government filed its motion to enforce the plea agreement pursuant to 

United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). 

McAllister has chosen not to file a response. 

 We have reviewed the motion and the record, and agree that McAllister’s 

proposed appeal falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, that he knowingly and 

voluntarily waived his appellate rights, and that enforcing the waiver would not result 

in a miscarriage of justice. See id. at 1325 (describing the factors this court considers 

when determining whether to enforce a waiver of appellate rights). 

 Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to enforce the plea agreement and 

DISMISS the appeal. 

 Entered for the Court 

 Per Curiam
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7451

DAYYAN ATTA BEY EX REL DERICK SEALEY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. RONALD D. MYERS, Superintendent; RALPH NORTHAM, Governor , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Anthony John Trenga , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 01074

- AJT

- JFA )

Submitted : April 4, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Dayyan Atta Bey ex rel Derick Sealey , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Derick Sealey appea ls the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition for failure to comply with its prior order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We review a district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of
discretion. Balla rd v. Carlson , 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Sealey v. Myers , No. 1:18

- cv
- 01074

- AJT

- JFA (E.D. Va. filed N ov. 1 3 , 2018 & entered Nov. 14, 2018 ). We deny as unnecessary a certificate of appealability
and deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage *de novo,* or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 4, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

1. *First Business Financial Services, Inc.,* Madison, Wisconsin; to engage *de novo* in certain community development activities by making a qualifying community welfare investment in a fund of funds, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(12)(i).

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 25, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-07170 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 SEPTEMBER 29, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-12956 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-20964-PAS-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

DAWIS GONZALEZ,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(September 29, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Maria Elena Pérez, appointed counsel for Dawis Gonzalez in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel has correctly assessed the relative merit of this appeal from the

judgment and commitment order entered in June 17, 2010. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw from representing Gonzalez in his direct appeal is

GRANTED, and the convictions and sentences imposed in the June order are

AFFIRMED. Nevertheless, because the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter

an amended judgment and commitment order on September 8, 2010, while the

present appeal was pending, the judgment in this case is VACATED. The matter

is now REMANDED for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to

consider the government’s motion to reduce Gonzalez’s sentences, and to re-enter

the amended judgment if it deems that action appropriate. See United States v.

Russell, 776 F.2d 955, 956 (11th Cir. 1985) (holding that the district court lacked

jurisdiction to entertain, during the pendency of an appeal, a motion filed pursuant

to a prior version of Rule 35(b)); see also United States v. Turchen, 187 F.3d 735,

743 (7th Cir. 1999) (reaching the same conclusion with respect to a motion filed

pursuant to the current version of Rule 35(b)).

2
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 24.1


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes 
and appoints each of Glenn P. Dickes, Joseph P. Page, Christopher M.R. Phillips
and Barry F. Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
PANAVISION INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the 
Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the 
undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to 
the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in 
connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with 
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including 
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any 
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority 
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be 
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-
in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may 
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 16th 
day of March 1999.

                                          /s/ RONALD O. PERELMAN
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Ronald O. Perelman
# RECEJ\/

UNITED STATES OFAMERICA 

## FEB 2 7

## 2017 DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION 

## HEARING OCi(; OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

MICHAEL HUERTA, ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Complainant,



### v. AERO TECH, LLC Respondent. ) ) ) DOKETNo.: FAA -2016-4270 ) ) Case No. 2015WA910115 ) ) FAAEnforcementTeam: Western ) ) Judge: Douglas M. Rawald ) ) ) )

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY

As a reminder, the undersigned will be out ofthe office from approximately February 13 until mid to late April. Ifcommunications with the FAA are necessary during this time period please contact JeffKamberg, the undersigned's assistant, at 425-227-2925. Respectfully submitted,

Kyle Lomazow Enforcement Division- Western Team 1601 Lind Ave, SW Renton, WA 98057-3356 Email: kyle.Jomazow@faa.gov Telephone: (425) 227-2007 (main) (425) 227.-1847 (direct). (425) 227-1007 (fax)I hereby certifY that the foregoing Notice ofUnavailability has been served viafacsimile, and First-Class Mail, to the following:

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 FAX: (202) 267-1293
The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Adruinistrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 FAX: (202)-366-7536 Stephen Doerr, Respondent's Counsel DOERR & KNUDSON, PA 212 WestFirst Street Portales, NM 88130 TEL: (575)-359-1289 Fax: (575) 359-1289

Datedthis 3rd day ofFebruary, 2017.

JeffKa:r:



# Leg:echuicia~ 425-227-2925 Jefferey.kamberg@faa.gov Enforcement Division National Enforcement Program Western Team Federal Aviation Administration Renton, Washington
2
Hydrology Days 2007



### Effectiveness of Erosion and Sediment Control Practices for

Forest Roads

Kelli Jo Rehder and John D. Stednick

Watershed Science Program, Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO

Abstract. Increased demands for land access for management, recreation, and other uses gave rise to increased ro ad development rates on Federal lands.

Past road construction methods were often unrestricted, until destructive landslides and water quality degradation could no longer be ignored. In order to minimize road construction and maintenance effects on aquatic resources, Best Management Practices (BMPs) were developed; BMPs are methods designed to control or eliminate the effects of nonpoint source (NPS) pollution. In regards to road constr uction, BMPs address the affects of erosional processes and sedimentation.

The National Forest Service has de veloped a set of 28 BMPs (Best Management Practices for Nonpoint Source Management) for road construction, maintenance, and obliteration. The efficiency of BMPs has been assessed by implementation of the measure, not the success of the measure in reducing sediment production. Therefore an assessment on the usefulness of the measures was needed. A literature review and synthesis on the effectiveness of each BMP measure was conducted. The BMPs are designed for application at the national level, but the efficiency of many BMPs varied by region, therefore few conclusive st atements could be made. However, effectiveness was shown for all revegetation efforts on hillslopes, obliteratedroads, and stream crossings. Outsloping road surfaces were found to outperform insloped roads in regards to sediment production. Water bars were shown to be effective at controlling road drainage, and lastly, gravel/rock road surfacing was found to reduce sediment from unpaved roads. As a result of the region variability for BMP effectiveness, individual states’ list of forest road BMPs should be consulted before any road-related activity is undertaken.