alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WRI-2013.03.31-10Q-Exh102






EXHIBIT 10.2


March 11, 2013




FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE




This Fourth Amendment to Promissory Note (this "Amendment") is to be effective as of the close of business March 11, 2013, or as otherwise stated herein.


WHEREAS, the undersigned are parties to that certain Promissory Note (as the same has been and may be hereafter renewed, amended, modified, or extended, the "Note") dated as of March 12, 2009 in the original amount of $12,910,386.14, made by WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS ("Weingarten"), a Texas  real estate investment trust, and payable to the order of RELIANCE TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the Master Nonqualified Plan Trust under the Weingarten Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Weingarten Realty Investors Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan ("Reliance"); and


WHEREAS, the scheduled maturity date of the Note is March 12, 2013; and


WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the maturity date under the Note to a date one year from the date of its currently-scheduled maturity; and


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Note to reflect this change and desire to memorialize the outstanding balance due under the Note as of March 11, 2013;


NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed:


1.    The second paragraph of the Note  shall be revised to be and read as follows:


"The entire unpaid balance of the Note, including accrued interest, shall be due and payable March 12, 2014."


		
	2.
	As of the close of business March 11, 2013, the balance due under the Note, including accrued interest, is $9,827,144.95.




In all other respects, the Note is hereby ratified and confirmed.


This instrument may be executed by the parties individually or in combination, in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument.  Individuals authorized to enter into this amendment on  behalf of Weingarten are identified on Exhibit A hereto.









1










	
		
	RELIANCE TRUST COMPANY

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/Wade Fox

	Its (Title):
	Sr. Vice President

	Date:
	2-5-2013










	
		
	WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/Stephen C. Richter

	Its (Title):
	Executive VP/CFO

	Date:
	2-1-13









2






Exhibit   A


Individuals Authorized to Enter into the Fourth Amendment to Promissory Note on behalf of Weingarten




Andrew M. Alexander
Stephen C. Richter





3
MISSISSIPPI ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (MSARNG) DRINKING 

WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Camp McCain Training Center, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, 

Army National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking 

Water Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to 

the American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water 

to ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: November 2022

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect

Future Testing Event: November 2025

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Mississippi National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 601-313-6148

Office E-mail Address: ng.ms.msarng.list.public-affairs@army.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42805

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

SANDY KEVIN NANNEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 678

Filed: October 28, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Steven J. Hippler, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of thirty years with five years 

determinate for arson, and concurrent unified sentence of seven years with two 

years determinate for malicious injury to property, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Eric D. Fredericksen, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Sandy Kevin Nanney was found guilty of one count of arson in the third degree; two 

counts of malicious injury to property (one a felony and one a misdemeanor); and a persistent 

violator enhancement. Idaho Code §§ 18-804. 18-7001(2), 18-7001, and 19-2514. The district 

court sentenced Nanney to a unified sentence of thirty years with five years determinate for the 

arson charge, and a concurrent unified sentence of seven years with two years determinate for the 

malicious injury to property charges. Nanney appeals asserting that the district court abused its 

discretion by imposing excessive sentences.
2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Nanney’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of and for the period covered   by the      Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      March 19, 2010 | /s/      Michael Moore          |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                       |                            |
|                       | Michael      Moore              |
|                       |                            |
|                       | Principal      FinancialOfficer |

----
XRM-EX10.1_2013.3.31-Q! Director agreement




Exhibit 10.1




Xerium Technologies, Inc. 
Non-Management Director Compensation Policy
Non-management directors receive an annual retainer of $112,000, which will be paid pursuant to the Xerium Technologies, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Stock Unit Plan. Under the plan, 50% of the retainer will be paid in the form of a grant of deferred stock units. Non-management directors will be given the opportunity to elect to receive the remainder of such retainer in deferred stock units or in cash. Please see the Directors’ Deferred Stock Unit Plan for additional information. 
Each of the chairs of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee also receive additional cash compensation at an annual rate of $10,000 per year, and the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Lead Independent Director, if there is one, each receive additional cash compensation at an annual rate of $5,000 per year. If the Chairman of the Board is a non-management director, then he or she will receive additional cash compensation at an annual rate of $55,000 per year.  Directors are also reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses for attending board and committee meetings.
----

| (1)     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:   August 20, 2012 | By:    | /s/  Kyle Kennedy                                                                                                           |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | Kyle Kennedy                                                                                                                     |   |
|                               |   | President,Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer and acting Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
ex10-30.htm


Exhibit 10.30


 



Sales contract of Industrial and Mineral Products


 


                      Contract No._____


Seller: Shanxi Yinyan Energy Development Co.,Ltd                           Address


Purchaser: Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon black Co., Ltd                        Date: 01/01/2008







1. Product name, price, delivery time and quantity


 



	
Product Name

	
Trademark

	
Model

	
Manufa-cuturer

	
Unit

	
Quantity

	
Price


(RMB)

	
Amount


(RMB)

	
Remarks


	
Coal Tar

	  	  	  	
Ton

	
900

	
2300

	  	
1.The price in this agreement is current market price2. There is 17% tax included in the price.3. The quantity is decided by the number actually occurred.


	
Total

	  	  	  





 


2. Quality Standard: YB/T5075-93


3. The conditions and duration of which supplier is responsible for: Within 2 days after the pickup of goods


4. Packaging standards, supply and recycle of packaging materials


5. Random spare, number and supply method of accessories


6. Reasonable wear and tear and method of calculation: It shall be based on the weights calculated from seller


7. Proprietary rights of the products are transferred upon the completion of the weighting, but proprietary rights belong to the sellers if the purchaser fails to make the payment.


8. Place and means of delivery: Delivered to the designated place


9. Means of transport, expense for transport and related items


10. Acceptance criteria, methods, date and period: the Quality Standard: YB/T5075-93, dispute shall be settled through negotiation.


11. Installation and test of equipment set


12. Means, date and place of settlement: The price is subject to the market condition, and the quantity is determined by the actual number occurred.


13. Means of guaranty (the guaranty agreement could be made in addition to this one )


14. The condition of termination of this contract


15. Default responsibility: It shall be settled according to the contract law of PRC


16. The means of dispute solution: It shall be settled through negotiation, or mediated by the business and administrative regulators,or go for


a. arbitration


b. lawsuit


17. The contract valid period: From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008


18. Other unspecified issues shall be settled through negotiation.


 



	
Supplier:


Company Name (Seal):


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent :


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:

	
Buyer:


Company Name:


Company Address:


Legal Representative:


Entrusted  agent:


Telephone:


Opening  bank:


Bank Account:


Zip Code:

	
Attestation:


 


 


 


Attestation Organization


Manager


 


Date:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3707 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3707

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude combat zone 
   compensation of members of the Armed Forces from employment taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2009

  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude combat zone 
   compensation of members of the Armed Forces from employment taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Armed Forces Tax Relief Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF COMBAT ZONE COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES FROM EMPLOYMENT TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 3121(i) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to service in the uniformed services) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``The term 
`wages' shall not include remuneration for active service performed in 
a month for which such individual is entitled to the benefits of 
section 112 (relating to certain combat zone compensation of members of 
the Armed Forces of the United States) to the extent remuneration for 
such service is excludable from gross income under such section.''.
    (b) Social Security Trust Funds Held Harmless.--There is hereby 
appropriated (out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated) for each fiscal year to each fund under the Social 
Security Act an amount equal to the reduction in the transfers to such 
fund for such fiscal year by reason of the amendment made by subsection 
(a).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to service performed after December 31, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20011-20012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation

[RR83550000, 156R5065C6, RX.59389832.1009676]


Addition to the Quarterly Status Report of Water Service, 
Repayment, and Other Water-Related Contract Actions

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of an additional proposed contract 
action pending through December 2015. This notice is in addition to the 
Quarterly Status Report of Water Service, Repayment, and Other Water-
Related Contract Actions which was published in the Federal Register on 
January 20, 2015 (80 FR 2727).

ADDRESSES: Information pertaining to the additional contract proposal 
may be obtained by calling or writing the Pacific Northwest Region, 
Bureau of Reclamation, Ephrata Field Office, P.O. Box 815, Ephrata, 
Washington 98823; telephone (509) 754-0227.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Kelly, Reclamation Law 
Administration Division, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, 
Colorado 80225-0007; telephone 303-445-2888.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following information is added to the 
list of proposed or amendatory contract actions in the Pacific 
Northwest Region:
    10. East Columbia Basin Irrigation District (District), Columbia 
Basin Project, Washington: Long-term contract to renew master water 
service contract No. 14-06-100-9165, as supplemented, to authorize the 
District to deliver a base quantity of up to 90,000 acre-feet of 
Columbia Basin Project water annually to up to 30,000 First Phase 
Continuation Acres located within the District, and continue delivery 
of additional water to land irrigated under the District's repayment 
contract during the peak period of irrigation water use annually.
    Except for the above addition, the January 20, 2015, Federal 
Register notice remains the same.


[[Page 20012]]


    Dated: March 3, 2015.
Roseann Gonzales,
Director, Policy and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-08596 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4332-90-P
H. R. 3663 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine 

An Act 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to delay the date on which the 

accreditation requirement under the Medicare Program applies to suppliers of 

durable medical equipment that are pharmacies. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MEDICARE DME ACCREDITATION DEADLINE FOR CERTAIN PHARMACIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1834(a)(20)(F)(i) of the Social Security 

Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(20)(F)(i)) is amended by inserting before 

the semicolon the following: ‘‘, except that the Secretary shall not 

require under this clause pharmacies to obtain such accreditation 

before January 1, 2010’’. 

(b) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as affecting the application of an accreditation requirement 

for pharmacies to qualify for bidding in a competitive acquisition 

area under section 1847 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

1395w–3). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 21
 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
    
    State of Incorporation1) Spacehab Government Services
    
    Colorado2) Space Media Incorporated
    
    Delaware3) Space Portal, Inc.
    
    Delaware4) Spacehab Microgravity Sciences, Inc.
    
    Delaware5) Spacehab Orbital Transportation, Inc.
    
    Delaware6) Astrogenetix Corporation
    
    Delaware7) Airward Corporation
    
    Delaware8) 1st Detect Corporation
    
    Delaware9) Derma Systems, Inc.
    
    Delaware10) Spacetech, Inc.
    
    Delaware11) Astrotech Space Operations, Inc.
    
    Delaware12) Astrotech Florida Holdings, Inc.
    
    Florida
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-432 and 731-TA-1024-1028 (Second Review) and AA1921-188 (Fourth Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (“PC strand”) from India, the antidumping duty orders on PC strand from Brazil, India, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand, as well as the antidumping duty finding on PC strand from Japan, would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on November 3, 2014 (79 FR 65246) and determined on February 6, 2015, that it would conduct expedited reviews (80 FR 9747, February 24, 2015).

                    The Commission completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on April 10, 2015. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4527 (April 2015), entitled                     *Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-432 and 731-TA-1024-1028 (Second Review) and AA1921-188 (Fourth Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: April 10, 2015.

Lisa R. Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2015-08671 Filed 4-14-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P