alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Readiness inspection provides vital training 

/ Published Dec. 26, 2019

CHANNEL ISLANDS AIR NATIONAL GUARD STATION, Port Hueneme, Calif. – Members of the 146th Airlift Wing, California Air National Guard, tested their ability to survive and operate in simulated base attack scenarios during a three-day exercise.

A Wing Inspection Team (WIT) provided scenarios and simulations while evaluating the wing's ability to operate. Scenarios included quick and correct responses to simulated CBRN Defense (Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense), SOF (Special Operations Forces), and cyberattacks.

"For many wing members, this was their first exposure to this type of scenario, so those functional skills will need time and practice to become refined. That's the true purpose of these exercises," said Air National Guard Senior Master Sgt. Marc Trujillo, installation emergency manager for the 146 AW.

"I believe we are going to be very capable of performing the primary tasking in a contested, degraded environment," he said. "In every training environment, you discover there are some areas needing improvement, and we have done that, but the exercise was beneficial in demonstrating to new Airmen the application of what we practice every year," said Trujillo.

Trujillo operated as the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) manager, overseeing operations and information flow inside the EOC so  leaders could make informed decisions and recommendations to the wing commander.

As the wing's most senior subject matter expert in CBRN, Trujillo also effectively provided critical information to WIT members to ensure realistic scenarios for participants during the November exercise.

"In preparation for the exercise, he gave the WIT a really good idea of what to look for during the inspection," said Air National Guard 2nd Lt. Terri De Guzman, director of inspections for the 146th AW.

"He is a nationally recognized emergency response manager and is a regional chair for our region with decades of experience in the field," De Guzman said. "To say he is a very high-valued asset in regards to training our Airmen is an understatement."

Readiness exercises used to involve multiple wings lasting a week and including around-the-clock operations. However, changes in U.S. Air Force training and evaluations for these exercises shifted around six years ago.

Military bases in the Air National Guard are now expected to perform these exercises annually, giving Trujillo and the Airmen more time to hone their training for the 146 AW's evaluation next November.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Linens 'n Things, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Norman Axelrod
---------------------------------
NORMAN AXELROD
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Linens 'n Things, Inc.

March 18, 2004



/s/ William T. Giles
---------------------------------
WILLIAM T. GILES
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Linens 'n Things, Inc.

March 18, 2004


                                       24
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3716 

To make certain adjustments to the price analysis of propane prepared 

by the Secretary of Commerce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2009 

Mr. STUPAK (for himself and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To make certain adjustments to the price analysis of propane 

prepared by the Secretary of Commerce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. 

4 Section 9(a) of the Propane Education and Research 

5 Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 6408(a)) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘price of consumer grade propane to a composite’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘average price of consumer grade propane to all 

8 end users to an equally weighted composite’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3716 IH

1 SEC. 2. UPDATED PRICE ANALYSIS. 

2 Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 

3 of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall prepare and 

4 make available to the public a propane price analysis re5 flecting the amendment made by section 1. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2(a)
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 (ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 In
connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Holli C. Nichols,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
 
 Date:
      May 7, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      HOLLIC.NICHOLSHolli
      C. Nichols
                  Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
SOUTH DAKOTA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (SDARNG) DRINKING 

WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

West Camp Rapid, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army 

National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water 

Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the 

American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to 

ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: August 2020

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect

Future Testing Event: August 2023

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: South Dakota National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 605-737-6721

Office E-mail Address: ng.sd.sdarng.list.pao@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
# Nevada National Guard keeps watch over New Year’s Eve celebrations

/ Published Dec. 31, 2017

LAS VEGAS, Nev. - With New Year’s Eve only hours away, Nevada National Guard Soldiers and Airmen made their final preparations for the largest domestic mobilization operation in Nevada Guard history here in Nevada’s largest city – the host of one of the nation’s biggest New Year’s Eve celebrations.

America's Party is the free New Year's Eve event held on the Las Vegas Strip put together by Las Vegas Events and the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority.

The mission to keep Las Vegas safe and secure during New Year’s has been deemed Operation Silver Phalanx by the Nevada Guard and it includes about 360 Soldiers and Airmen on state active duty orders. It is a joint operation overseen by the Nevada Department of Emergency Management and prominently features the Nevada Guard and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.

 Officials stressed there is no specific, credible threat to the Las Vegas Strip or downtown Las Vegas or any other site in southern Nevada. The Guardsmen will supplement first responders in the event of any contingency during the New Year’s celebration that annually draws hundreds of thousands of attendees.

 With the October Route 91 Harvest country music festival shooting prominent in the minds of Nevadans, Gov. Brian Sandoval requested the Nevada Guard deploy several hundred Soldiers and Airmen to support Metro policemen and other agencies and ensure security in downtown Las Vegas and on The Strip as well as at McCarran International Airport and other various visible locations around Sin City and the Silver State.

 “Everyone wants to come to Las Vegas to have a good time,” said Brig. Gen. William Burks, the Nevada Guard’s Adjutant General. “Our mission is for our Nevada Guardsmen to keep Nevadans safe. Everyone who comes to visit Nevada is a Nevadan for a day, so we are going to keep them safe.”

 According to Las Vegas officials, an estimated 330,000 people will descend upon Las Vegas this weekend to ring in the New Year.

 Beginning Dec. 29, visitors flying into McCarran International Airport began seeing Guardsmen patrol the concourse alongside Metro police officers.

 Kathy Taylor, of Henderson, Nevada, was at the airport to pick up a friend and noted the increase in police and the armed National Guardsmen.

 “It’s good to see,” Taylor said. “Especially knowing they are around for New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day.”

 “In Vegas, we get people arriving from all over the world,” Taylor said. “It’s good to see local people are protecting us. They know the area, they know the people and that makes me happy.”

 Nevada Guard security support during the New Year’s holiday has been a familiar sight in Las Vegas for many years. The Nevada Guard has conducted exercises and operations with southern Nevada law enforcement agencies for more than a decade at New Year’s.

 “We are very familiar with this mission. We have done this mission in various forms for more than ten years,” Burks said. “My advice to all is just to have a good time and keep it safe.”
#### *Ex parte*JAMES G. KING.

*Error io Rock county.*

In proceedings under the statute for partition of real estate, the petitioner may bring a writ of error to reverse the judgment; and if the proceedings are erroneous, the judgment will be reversed, that the errors may be corrected.

James G.,King filed his petition in the Rock District Court, praying for the partition of certain lands lying in Rock county. The commissioners appointed by the (jourt, made partition of lands which did not correspond with the petition, and some of which was not embraced in it; and tho division was not made according to law or the respective interests of the parties. The mistake was not discovered, either by tbe court or counsel, during the term, and tho report of the commissioners was confirmed and judgment entered accordingly. King, the petitioner, brought this writ of error to reverse the judgment, in order to have the proceedings perfected in the court below.

WiiitOjNT, for King,

briefly stated the case, and showed that the errors had arisen purely through mistake; that there was no opposition to the petition, and that it was for the benefit of all persons interested to reverse the judgment, that the District Court may be enabled to make partition of the premises described in the petition, according to law. ,

*47Chief Justice Dunn

delivered the following opinion of the court ¡

In this case the petitioner, James G. King, filed his petition for the partition of certain real estate situate in the county of Rock, in the District Court of Rock county, at October term of said court, A. D. 1841. At said term commissioners were appointed to make partition of the land described in said petition. At the April term of said court, 1842, the said commissioners made their report to the said court, in which they gave the same quartet section of land to two persons entire, and not by moiety, and one quarter section to the petitioner which was not described in his petition. The District Court rendered judgment, that partition he made of the premises according to said report.

It is unnecessary to perplex this question with reasons, as it is obvious that the report was defective and erroneous, and consequently the judgment of the court thereon; which must have arisen from the usual hurry of business at the close of a protracted term of court, when the same strict and minute examination of lengthy reports is not made, as when there is more time and less press of business.

The judgment of the District Court is therefore reversed, and the case remanded to the said District Court for such further proceedings therein as may be legal and proper.

Whiton, for King.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE ESTATE OF:

ETHEL LADINE SWEZY STAMNITZ,

DECEASED.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00081-CV

Appeal from the

Probate Court No. 2

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2006-P00369-2)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is an interlocutory appeal of an order rendered on February 19,

2008, by the Probate Court No. 2, El Paso County, Texas. Appellant now asks this Court to dismiss

this appeal with prejudice for the reason that the parties have agreed to certain facts making this

appeal moot. Appellee has not objected to the motion, and there is no indication that this Court’s

dismissal would prevent Appellee from seeking relief to which she would otherwise be entitled. 

See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1). We therefore grant the motion and dismiss the appeal with prejudice.

Because the motion to dismiss is silent as to how to share costs, the costs will be taxed against

Appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

KENNETH R. CARR, Justice

October 23, 2008

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 19, 2011 

1012 

Order 

 

October 19, 2011 

142763 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142763 

 COA: 293580 

Kent CC: 09-001515-FC 

GEORGE MICHAEL GRESHAM, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 MARILYN KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley      Act of 2002**

**(i)**
**(ii)**

|                                   | **WESTSTAR                FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION** |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                                       |   |
|                                   |                                                       |   |
| Date:                November 10, 2006 | By:                                                        | /s/                Randall C. Hall |
|                                   |                                                       |   |
|                                   |                                                       | Randall                C. Hall |
|                                   |                                                       | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial |
|                                   |                                                       | and                Principal Accounting Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>            
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-04-1999
<CASH>                                         307,719
<SECURITIES>                                    61,299
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,125
<INVENTORY>                                     27,673
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               559,307
<PP&E>                                         235,733
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 718,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,420
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           961
<OTHER-SE>                                     436,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   718,867
<SALES>                                        777,097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               777,097
<CGS>                                          644,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  759,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,559)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,910
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,828
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Airspan Networks, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the period ended October 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),





I,
      Eric
      Stonestrom, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 13, 2006




By:  /s/
              ERIC STONESTROMEric
                Stonestrom
              *Chief
                Executive Officer*





**A
      signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Airspan Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Airspan Networks, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Sonic Innovations, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Samuel L. Westover, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen
L. Wilson, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ SAMUEL L. WESTOVERSamuel L. WestoverPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2006/s/ STEPHEN L. WILSONStephen L. WilsonSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryMay 10, 2006


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION

I, David C. Bloom, Chief Executive Officer of Chelsea
Property Group, Inc., the sole general partner of CPG Partners, L.P. ("the OP"),
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as
follows:

|1. | The annual report on Form 10-K of the OP for the year ended December 31,
2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the OP.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this
12th day of March, 2004.

| | /s/ David C. Bloom
David C. Bloom
Chief Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Chelsea Property Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Chelsea Property Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.