alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Chuck French [French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 6:09 PM To: Higgins, Cortney Cc: Ann Johnson; Hancy, Cindy Wang; Erin Newman; Fred Talcott; Jan Tierney; Kelly Rimer; Mark Morris; Phil Mulrine; Marinshaw, Richard; Robin Langdon; Sara Ayres; Steve Fruh; Tim Benner; Tom Walton Subject: RE: EO 13563 Interagency Comments on Chromium RTR Attachments: E O 12866 CromiumElectroplatingSteelPickling 2060 - AQ60P Promulgation - 8 - 14 - 2012 - clean - 550pm.docx Hi Cortney, Attached is a slightly revised clean preamble/rule which incorporates a few small remaining edits that we discussed. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. Chuck French Phone: 919 - 541 - 7912 (See attached file: E O 12866 CromiumElectroplatingStee lPickling 2060 - AQ60P Promulgation - 8 - 14 - 2012 - clean - 550pm.docx)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUCE ALLEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

SCOTT KERNAN; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-56022

D.C. No. 

2:18-cv-02586-AB-RAO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 4, 2022 ** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges

Bruce Allen appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in

favor of the defendants in his civil rights action alleging deliberate indifference to

serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and

FILED

MAY 4 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 * * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d

1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

Summary judgment was proper for the defendants. There is no evidence that

the doctors knew of and disregarded an excessive risk to Allen’s health. See 

Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994) (setting forth the deliberate

indifference standard). Allen’s bare allegations and unqualified lay medical

opinions do not refute the defendants’ admissible evidence that they consistently

and extensively treated his symptoms and that he was not exhibiting symptoms of

Valley Fever for 19 months before the diagnosis. See Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S.

372, 380 (2007) (an assertion that is “blatantly contradicted by the record, so that

no reasonable jury could believe it” will not create a genuine issue of material fact

at summary judgment). At most, Allen presents a difference of opinion between

himself and the doctors about the testing that should have been done for his

symptoms. Such a difference of opinion does not rise to the level of deliberate

indifference. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 107 (1976); Toguchi, 391 F.3d at

1058; Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). 

AFFIRMED.

2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3606 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to make a technical correction to 

an amendment made by the Credit CARD Act of 2009. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 

Mr. WELCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to make a technical 

correction to an amendment made by the Credit CARD 

Act of 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit CARD Tech5 nical Corrections Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

7 Section 163(a) of the Truth in Lending Act (U.S.C. 

8 1666b(a)), as amended by section 106(b) of the Credit 

9 Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3606 IH

1 2009, is amended by inserting ‘‘a credit card account 

2 under’’ after ‘‘payment on’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2988 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2988

   To require any COVID-19 vaccine mandate issued by Congress or an 
     Executive agency to include informed parental consent for the 
    administration of a COVID-19 vaccine to a minor, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2021

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require any COVID-19 vaccine mandate issued by Congress or an 
     Executive agency to include informed parental consent for the 
    administration of a COVID-19 vaccine to a minor, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Parental Consent for Vaccination 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INFORMED PARENTAL CONSENT FOR COVID-19 VACCINATION.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Executive agency'' has 
the meaning given the term in section 105 of title 5, United States 
Code.
    (b) Requirement.--Any COVID-19 vaccine mandate issued by an Act of 
Congress or by an Executive agency shall require the written and 
informed consent of a legal guardian for the administration of a COVID-
19 vaccine to an individual under the age of 18 years old.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to allow for or otherwise authorize a COVID-19 vaccine 
mandate issued by an Act of Congress or by an Executive agency.
                                 <all>
```
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our reports dated March 1, 2002, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Schlotzsky's, Inc. on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of
Schlotzsky's, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-57077, effective June 17, 1998 and
File No. 333-37785, effective October 14, 1997 and File No. 333-03809, effective
May 15, 1996).


GRANT THORNTON LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 1, 2002
Exhibit 23.2



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-16115,  No. 333-16117,  No. 333-16121,  No.  333-44000,  No. 333-76631,  No.
333-93227,  and No.  333-68054 on Form S-8 and in  Registration  Statements  No.
333-85313,  No. 333-58202, and No. 333-75146 on Form S-3 of our report dated May
2, 2005,  relating  to  management's  report on the  effectiveness  of  internal
control over financial reporting appearing in this amendment to Annual Report on
Form 10-K of InteliData Technologies Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2004.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

McLean, Virginia
May 2, 2005
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:



(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;



(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.



|       |                                                                     
|------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                           
|       | General Partner                                                     
|       |                                                                     
|       |                                                                     
|By:    | /S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                                
|       |                                                                     
|Name:  | Brenda G. Gujral                                                    
|Title: | President of the General Partner and                                
|       | principal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P
|Date:  | May 11, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,094,774
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,395,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,776,598
<INVENTORY>                                  3,587,225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,900,391
<PP&E>                                       6,336,108
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,650,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,470,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,675,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       36,827,781
<PREFERRED>                                    341,711
<COMMON>                                         1,559
<OTHER-SE>                                (40,214,735)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,470,568
<SALES>                                     12,396,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,396,272
<CGS>                                        6,113,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,562,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,300,889)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,300,889)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,300,889)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.32)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wanda D. Dearth,  the Chief Executive Officer of Resolve Staffing,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A  of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter  ended June 30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated: August 28, 2003



                                       /s/ Wanda D. Dearth
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Name: Wanda D. Dearth
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Moshe BenBassat, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
September 30, 2001 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of ClickSoftware Technologies
Ltd.


                                    By:     /s/ MOSHE BENBASSAT
                                          ---------------------
                                    Name:   Moshe BenBassat
                                    Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                       33
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CTT International Distributors Inc.
      (“CTT”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Amit Sankhala, President, Chief Executive Officer of CTT and sole member of
      the
      Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of CTT.









/s/Amit
      Sankhala


Amit
      Sankhala


Chief
      Executive Officer




November
      10, 2006








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CTT International Distributors Inc.
      (“CTT”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Amit Sankhala, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of CTT, certify, pursuant
      to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of CTT.






/s/Amit
      Sankhala


Amit
      Sankhala


Chief
      Financial Officer




November
      10, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                            
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ BRUCE A. WILLIAMSON                    
|                   |  |     |  | Bruce A. Williamson Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Wayne Pastore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



Date: August 3, 2010/s/ WAYNE PASTORE Wayne Pastore Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 127838(21) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 127838 COA: 256770 Wayne CC: 95-004065-FC MEARL ELTON JONES, a/k/a JAMES E. JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of October 31, 2005 is considered, and it is DE NIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. See People v O’Donnell , 474 Mich 867 (2005).

d0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60245

Conference Calendar

 

AWA KALU,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION

SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Administrative Record No. A29 574 173

- - - - - - - - - -

August 28, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Awa Kalu filed a petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ final order of exclusion issued pursuant to

8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(2)(C) and 1182 (a)(2)(A)(i)(II). The

Immigration and Naturalization Service has filed a motion to

dismiss Kalu’s petition for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that

under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(b) an alien against whom a final order of
No. 96-60245

- 2 -

exclusion has been issued “may obtain judicial review of such

order by habeas corpus proceedings and not otherwise.” “Any

appeal from an exclusion proceeding . . . can only be brought by

a habeas corpus petition to the district court.” Delgado-Carrera

v. INS, 773 F.2d 629, 631 (5th Cir. 1985). Kalu’s petition for

review is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Kalu’s motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Kalu’s motions for

release pending review, and summary judgment are DENIED as moot.

IFP MOTION DENIED; OTHER MOTIONS DENIED AS MOOT; PETITION

DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAC01000 L10100000.XZ0000 15XL1109AF LXSIOVHD0000]


Notice of Public Meeting of the Central California Resource 
Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Central California 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: Business meetings will be held Thursday and Friday, April 23-24, 
2015, at the BLM Mother Lode Field Office, 5152 Hillsdale Circle, El 
Dorado Hills, CA. Members of the public are welcome to attend.
    On April 23, the RAC will meet from noon to 6 p.m. On April 24, the 
RAC will meet from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. Time for public comment is 
reserved from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. on April 24.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BLM Central California District 
Manager Este Stifel, (916) 978-4626; or BLM Public Affairs Officer 
David Christy, (916) 941-3146.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 12-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in the Central 
California District, which includes the Bishop, Bakersfield, Hollister, 
Ukiah and Mother Lode Field Offices. At this meeting, agenda topics 
will include an update on resource management issues by the Field 
Managers including Lake Berryessa, Coast Dairies, Point Arena and oil 
and gas. Additional ongoing business will be discussed by the council. 
All meetings are open to the public. Members of the public may present 
written comments to the council. Each formal council meeting will have 
time allocated for public comments. Depending on the number of persons 
wishing to speak, and the time available, the time for individual 
comments may be limited. The meeting is open to the public. Individuals 
who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretation and other reasonable accommodations, should contact the 
BLM as provided above.

    Dated: March 31, 2015.
Ruben Leal,
Associate District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2015-08254 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-40-P