Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 19691 

Local 268, Sheet Metal Workers 

International Association, AFL–CIO 

(the Union) Located in Caseyville, IL 

[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 

2015–05; Application No. L–11794] 

Exemption 

The restrictions of sections 

406(a)(1)(A), 406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1), and 

406(b)(2) of the Act, shall not apply to 

the sale by the Fund of certain improved 

real property located at 2727 N. 89th 

Street, Caseyville, IL 62232 (the 

Building), to the Union (the Sale), 

provided that the following conditions 

have been met: 

(a) The Sale is a one-time transaction 

for cash; 

(b) At the time of the Sale, the Fund 

receives the greater of either: (1) 

$110,226.48; or (2) the fair market value 

of the Building, as established by a 

qualified independent appraiser (the 

Appraiser), as described in condition 

(c), as of the date of Sale; 

(c) Before the date of Sale, an 

Appraiser who satisfies the 

Department’s definition of ‘‘qualified 

independent appraiser’’ will be retained 

by the Independent Fiduciary on behalf 

of the Fund without any involvement of 

the Union or any other party to the 

covered transactions or any planned 

future transactions, and will conduct a 

full, independent Appraisal (the 

Appraisal) of the Building for purposes 

of the Sale that complies in all respects 

with applicable appraisal standards; 

(d) A qualified independent fiduciary 

(the Independent Fiduciary), acting on 

behalf of the Fund, represents the 

Fund’s interests for all purposes with 

respect to the Sale, and: (1) Determines, 

among other things, that it is in the best 

interest of the Fund to proceed with the 

Sale; and (2) reviews and approves the 

purchase price and methodology used 

by the Appraiser in its Appraisal; 

(e) The Fund pays no fees, 

commissions or other expenses 

associated with the Sale; and 

(f) The terms and conditions of the 

Sale are at least as favorable to the Fund 

as those obtainable in an arm’s-length 

transaction with an unrelated third 

party. 

Written Comments 

The Department invited all interested 

persons to submit written comments 

and/or requests for a public hearing 

with respect to the notice of proposed 

exemption, published on December 30, 

2014, at 79 FR 78486. All comments and 

requests for hearing were due by 

February 13, 2015. During the comment 

period, the Department received no 

comments and no requests for a hearing 

from interested persons. Accordingly, 

after giving full consideration to the 

entire record, the Department has 

decided to grant the exemption. The 

complete application file (Application 

No. L–11794), including all 

supplemental submissions received by 

the Department, is available for public 

inspection in the Public Disclosure 

Room of the Employee Benefits Security 

Administration, Room N–1515, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. 

For a more complete statement of the 

facts and representations supporting the 

Department’s decision to grant this 

exemption, refer to the notice of 

proposed exemption published on 

December 30, 2014, at 79 FR 78486. 

For Further Information Contact: Mr. 

Scott Ness of the Department, telephone 

(202) 693–8561. (This is not a toll-free 

number.) 

General Information 

The attention of interested persons is 

directed to the following: 

(1) The fact that a transaction is the 

subject of an exemption under section 

408(a) of the Act and/or section 

4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve 

a fiduciary or other party in interest or 

disqualified person from certain other 

provisions to which the exemption does 

not apply and the general fiduciary 

responsibility provisions of section 404 

of the Act, which among other things 

require a fiduciary to discharge his 

duties respecting the plan solely in the 

interest of the participants and 

beneficiaries of the plan and in a 

prudent fashion in accordance with 

section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does 

it affect the requirement of section 

401(a) of the Code that the plan must 

operate for the exclusive benefit of the 

employees of the employer maintaining 

the plan and their beneficiaries; 

(2) These exemptions are 

supplemental to and not in derogation 

of, any other provisions of the Act and/ 

or the Code, including statutory or 

administrative exemptions and 

transactional rules. Furthermore, the 

fact that a transaction is subject to an 

administrative or statutory exemption is 

not dispositive of whether the 

transaction is in fact a prohibited 

transaction; and 

(3) The availability of these 

exemptions is subject to the express 

condition that the material facts and 

representations contained in the 

application accurately describes all 

material terms of the transaction which 

is the subject of the exemption. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

April, 2015. 

Lyssa E. Hall, 

Director of Exemption Determinations, 

Employee Benefits Security Administration, 

U.S. Department of Labor. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08301 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–29–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of March 16, 2015 through March 

20, 2015. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. a significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. the sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. a significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. there has been a shift in production 

by such workers’ firm or subdivision to 

a foreign country of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles which 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

19692 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 

are produced by such firm or 

subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. the country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. the country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. there has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) the workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) either— 

(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and 

the component parts it supplied for the 

firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) a loss or business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

None. 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

85,717, California Redwood Company, 

Korbel, California. December 9, 2013 

85,810, Innopad Technology, Inc., 

Wilmington, Massachusetts. March 

18, 2015 

85,817, Schneider Electric USA, Inc., 

Salt Lake City, Utah. March 18, 2015 

85,821, Maverick Tube Corporation DBA 

Tenaris, Conroe, Texas. February 2, 

2014 

85,841, Bradken Inc., Chehalis, 

Washington. March 18, 2015 

85,843, Sabic Innovative Plastics, 

Washington, West Virginia. February 

17, 2014 

85,844, A Schulman, Inc., Stryker, Ohio. 

February 19, 2014 

85,848, Heritage Home Group LLC, 

Lenoir, North Carolina. February 23, 

2014 

85,851, Bose Corporation, Blythewood, 

South Carolina, March 10, 2014 

85,860, Coherent, Inc., Santa Clara, 

California. March 2, 2014 

85,863, Tejas Mfg. Co., San Angelo, 

Texas. February 27, 2014 

85,866, Panasonic Disc Manufacturing 

Corporation of America (PDMC), 

Torrance, California. March 4, 2014 

85,879, Triumph Composite Systems, 

Spokane, Washington. March 12, 

2014 

85,830, Woodbridge Ventures LLC, 

Lansing, Michigan. February 12, 2014 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

85,806, Premier Tech Chrones, 

Montgomery, Alabama. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

85,797, Revett Mining Company, Inc., 

Troy, Montana. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

85,799, Comprehensive Logistics, Inc., 

Lansing, Michigan. 

85,811, Chancellors, Master & Scholrs, 

West Nyack, New York. 

85,814, Grape Solar, Inc., Eugene, 

Oregon. 

85,829, Sony Puerto Rico, Inc., 

Guaynabo, Puerto Rico. 

85,831, Carefusion, Albuquerque, New 

Mexico. 

85,833, Milestone Systems, Inc., 

Burnsville, Minnesota. 

85,858, Transcend Services, Inc., 

Atlanta, Georgia. 

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

85,709, Brammo, Inc., Talent, Oregon. 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of March 16, 

2015 through March 20, 2015. These 

determinations are available on the 

Department’s Web site www.tradeact/ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 19693 

taa/taa_search_form.cfm under the 

searchable listing of determinations or 

by calling the Office of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888– 

365–6822. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of 

March 2015. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08317 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Eligibility To 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Office of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221 (a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 

The petitioners or any other persons 

showing a substantial interest in the 

subject matter of the investigations may 

request a public hearing, provided such 

request is filed in writing with the 

Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than April 23, 2015. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments regarding the 

subject matter of the investigations to 

the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than April 23, 2015. 

The petitions filed in this case are 

available for inspection at the Office of 

the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, Employment and Training 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of 

March 2015. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

APPENDIX 

14 TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 3/9/15 AND 3/13/15 

TA–W Subject firm (petitioners) Location Date of 

institution 

Date of 

petition 

85866 ............. Panasonic Disc Manufacturing Corporation of America (PDMC) (Company) Torrance, CA ......... 03/09/15 03/04/15 

85867 ............. Day & Zimmermann, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ................................................... Parsons, KS ........... 03/09/15 03/06/15 

85868 ............. Honeywell Safety Products (Company) .......................................................... Cranston, RI .......... 03/10/15 03/10/15 

85869 ............. ProTeam, Inc. (Company) .............................................................................. Boise, ID ................ 03/10/15 03/09/15 

85870 ............. Maidenform/HanesBrands (Workers) ............................................................. Fayetteville, NC ..... 03/11/15 03/10/15 

85871 ............. Multiband USA (Workers) ............................................................................... Richmond, KY ........ 03/11/15 03/10/15 

85872 ............. Concurrent Manufacturing Solutions, LLC (Company) .................................. Ozark, MO ............. 03/11/15 03/10/15 

85873 ............. John Deere & Company (EW/TCAO) (Workers) ............................................ Waterloo, IA ........... 03/11/15 03/05/15 

85874 ............. Central Missouri Plastics (State/One-Stop) .................................................... Lee’s Summit, MO 03/11/15 03/09/15 

85875 ............. Archer Daniels Midland Cocoa (Workers) ...................................................... Hazelton, PA .......... 03/11/15 03/08/15 

85876 ............. Sensor Switch (Company) .............................................................................. Wallingford, CT ...... 03/12/15 03/11/15 

85877 ............. FTE Automotive USA Inc. (Company) ........................................................... Auburn Hills, MI ..... 03/12/15 03/12/15 

85878 ............. MicroTelecom Systems LLC (State/One-Stop) .............................................. Uniondale, NY ....... 03/13/15 03/12/15 

85879 ............. Triumph Composite Systems (Union) ............................................................ Spokane, WA ......... 03/13/15 03/12/15 

[FR Doc. 2015–08312 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of March 9, 2015 through March 

13, 2015. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. the sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. there has been a shift in production 

by such workers’ firm or subdivision to 

a foreign country of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles which 

are produced by such firm or 

subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES