!13TH CONGRESS ) 

2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ( 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2015 

REPORT 

OF THE 

REPORT 

113-

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS 

[TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 

- ~ --+----~ , 2014.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House __________ __._,/ on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

-tFULL COiffi\11111!:1!: PRIHIJ 

113TH CONGRESS ) 

2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES l REPORT --+-C' 

113-"" \...._ ~ 

87-055 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2015 

REPORT 

OF THE 

COMMITTEE '.ON APPROPRIATIONS 

lTO ACCOMPANY H.R. 

, 2014.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House 

on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFJCg 

WASHINGTO;.I ; 2014 

---~ 

CONTENTS 

Bill Totals ............ .. ......................... . .......................... . Committee Budget Review Process ............................. . Introduction ., ...................................................................... . Funding Increases ................ . 

Committee Recommendations by Major Category ............... . Active, Reserve, and National Guard Military Personnel 

Operation and Maintenance ...................... , ..... . Procurement .............................................. . ................. . Research, Development, Test and Evaluation .................. . Defense Health Program ....................................................................... . Overseas Contingency Operations ..................... . Classified Programs ...................................................................... .. TITLE I. MILITARY PERSONNEL .................................... . Military Personnel Overview .. Summary of End Strength ............... . ....................................... . Overall Active End Strength ............. ............ .... . ............................. . Overall Selected Reserve End Strength ................................ .. Full-Time Support Strengths ............................................... . Reprogramming Guidance for Military Personnel Accounts 

Special Interest Items ................................................................................ .. Sexual Assault Prevention and Response ..................... .. ................... . Long-Term Temporary Duty Assignments .. .. ....................... . Permanent Change of Station Efficiencies .................... . Cultural Sensitivity Training ................................................................... . Handicapped Accessibility of Military Service Stations ................ . Personnel Transition Coordination ......................................................... . Minority Outreach and Officer Accessions . .. ............ .. Military Personnel, Anny ....................... ..... . ..................... .. ................ . Regtonally Ahgned Forces Language Capabtlity . .. ........................ .. Mthtary Family Housmg at Camp Humphreys ................. .. Mthtary Personnel, Navy .... .. .. . . .. ............... .. Military Personnel, Marine Corps . .. ................. . Military Personnel, Air Force .......................................................................... .. Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Force ................ .. ............... . Reserve Personnel, Anny ................... , .. .. Reserve Personnel, Navy 

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps ................................ . Reserve Personnel, Air Force ............................... . National Guard Personnel, Army ............................... . National Guard Personnel, Air Force ................... . TITLE II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ...................................... . Reprogramming Guidance for Operation and Maintenance Accounts 

Operation and Maintenance Budget Execution Data ................................. . Special Interest Items ............................ .. ............................. .. Readiness .............................. ..................... . ................ .. Service Audit Agency Validation .................................... .. ............... . Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair Budget Exhibits .............................. . Depot Maintenance ........................................................ .. Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization .............................. . Suicide Prevention Training and Outreach .......... Working Conditions in Bangladesh ......... Overestimation and Reporting of Civilian Workforce 

Operation and Maintenance Budget Documentation ............... . Operational Reserve ......... ,,,,.,,, .. , .... . . ..................... . 

(Ill) 

Page 

1 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

4 

5 

6 

6 

6 

7 

9 

9 

9 

9 

10 

10 

11 

11 

I2 

12 

13 

I3 

14 

14 

14 

18 

18 

18 

22 

26 

30 

30 

33 

36 

39 

42 

45 

49 

51 

52 

52 

52 

53 

54 

54 

54 

55 

55 

56 

56 

57 
IV 

Military Information Support Operations ................ . ................................ . Nuclear and Natural Disaster Response 

Performance Measures ......................... . Operation and Maintenance, Army .............................. . Cemeterial Expenses ... ... . ...... . ... , ............................... . Army Inventory Management System .......................................................... . Operation and Maintenance, Navy .................................. . Tire Successor Initiative ..................... . ........................ . Shipboard Lighting Systems ............ .................... . ............. . Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps ................................ .. Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force ............................... . Operation and Maintenance, Air Force ............................................................ . Air Force Flying Hour Metrics ..................................................................... .. Air Force Weapon System Sustainment ...................... .. ................. .. Air Education and Training Command Infrastructure ......................... .. Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide ...................................................... . Special Operations Command-Operation and Maintenance Funding .... . Special Operations Command-Flying Hours Restoration ..................... .. Special Operations Command-Budget Justification ................................ . Special Operations Command-Reprogramming Guidance ...................... . Special Operations Command-Use of Major Force Program~ll Funds . Special Operations Command-Oversight .................................................... . Special Operations Command-National Capital Region ........................... .. Special Operations Command-Suicide Prevention and Psychological 

Health ... . . ............ . ......................................................... .. Special Operations Command-Human Physical Performance Program 

Special Operations Command-Advanced Education Program 

Special Operations Command-Classified Adjustments ...................... . Energy Efficiency ..................... . Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit .......... .. Automated Continuous Evaluation System .............. . Overseas Military Installation Inventory ........................... .. Spare Parts Management ..................... ...................... . .................. . Transportable, Modular, Renewable Energy Platforms ................ .. National Security Education Program ..................................................... . Audit Readiness ........ . ............................................................. . Cloud Computing Services ........................ .................. . ......................... .. Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve .......................................... . Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve ......................................... . Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve ................. .. Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve ..... .. ............ . Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard 

Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard ... Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Account 

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces 

Environmental Restoration, Army ................................................................... . Environmental Restoration, Navy .................................................................... . Vieques and Culebra Environmental Restoration ....................... .. Environmental Restoration, Air Force .......................... . Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide ...................... . Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites 

Environmental Restoration Annual Report to Congress 

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid 

Humanitarian Mine Action Program .......... .......... .. ............. .. Cooperative Threat Reduction Account ......................................... .. Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund 

TITLE III. PROCUREMENT ............................................................................. .. Special Interest Items . ............................... .. ................... .. Reprogramming Guidance for Acquisition Accounts 

Reprogramming Reporting Requirements 

Funding Increases ............................... . Classified Annex ......... . High Mobility Engineer Excavator 

Tactical Power Sources .................... .. ................ .. Mobile User Objective System Terminals ..................... . ........................... . Aircraft. Procurement, Army .............................. .. ................................ . Army Aviation Restructure Initiative ................................. .. 

Page 

57 

58 

58 

58 

64 

64 

64 

73 

73 

73 

76 

76 

82 

82 

83 

83 

89 

89 

89 

90 

90 

91 

91 

92 

93 

93 

94 

94 

95 

95 

95 

95 

96 

96 

96 

97 

97 

100 

103 

106 

109 

112 

115 

115 

115 

115 

115 

116 

116 

116 

116 

116 

116 

117 

117 

119 

121 

121 

121 

121 

121 

122 

122 

122 

122 

126 
v 

Missile Procurement, Army ........................................ . Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army 

Procurement of Ammunition, Army .......................... .,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,, ....... . Other Procurement, Army ............................................................................... . Handheld Standoff Mine Detection System ................................. . Body Armor Modernization .................................... ,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,.,, .......... . Air and Missile Defense Planning and Control System .......................... .. High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle Modernization 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy ............ ,, ......................... . MH--£0R ................. . ......................... . EA-18G Aircraft. ........... ., ................................ . Weapons Procurement, Navy ......................................... . Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps 

Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy .................................................... .. Cruiser Modernization ............................ . Aircraft Carrier Refueling ....................... .. Littoral Combat Ship .................... . Other Procurement, Navy ........................... .. Procurement, Marine Corps ..... ................................. . ..................... . Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ............................. . CV-22 ............... ........ ....... . .................. . KC-10 ..................................... ................. ........................ . .................. . Missile Procurement, Air Force ......... .................. .. ................... .. Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle ................................... .. Global Positioning System III ....................................................................... . Preferred Munitions .......................... . ............................. .. Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ......................... .. .............. . Preferred Munitions ....................................................................... .. Other Procurement, Air Force .......................... . Procurement, Defense-Wide ............................................................................... . National Guard and Reserve Component Proportionate Funding ............. .. National Guard and Reserve Equipment Account 

Special Operations Command-C-146A 

Defense Production Act Purchases ................................................ .. Rare Earth Elements ................. .. TITLE IV. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION 

Special Interest Items ....................................................... . ................. .. Reprogramming Guidance for Acquisition Accounts .... .. Reprogramming Reporting Requirements 

Funding Increases ................. .. ......................................... . Classified Annex ................... ........................ .. ..................... . Lithium-Ion Batteries .......................................... . ....................... . Hybrid Airship Development ................................... .. Anti-Corrosion Efforts ........... .. ....................... . Explosive Ordnance Disposal .......................................................... .. Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Anny ................. .. Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle ............................ .. .................. . Network Integration Evaluation ................. . 

De~aded Visual Environment .................................................. . Po ymer Research Improvements ................................................................ . Advanced Concepts and Simulation ............. .. .............. . Testing of Virtual Training Systems ............................................ .. Army Net Zero Policy ........................... . ................................................ .. Lightweight Advanced Personnel Protection ................................. . Ammunition Management .. . ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . ................... . .......................... .. Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy ................... .. Amphibious Combat Vehicle ................................. . .............................. . Automated Test and Re-Test ...................................... .. Littoral Combat Ship Training ............................... .. Arctic Center of Excellence ............ . . ................................ . Wound Care Research Program ............... .. ....................... .. Automated Critical Care System ................................................. .. P-BA Open Architecture ............. ................. .. ................. . Aircrafl Systems Modernization ................................................................... . Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force .. .. ............... .. Global Hawk, U-2, and High Altitude ISR ....................................... .. Combat Rescue Helicopter ............... .. 

Pog• 

126 

129 

133 

137 

145 

145 

145 

145 

146 

153 

153 

153 

158 

162 

165 

165 

166 

166 

177 

182 

189 

189 

190 

194 

194 

194 

194 

197 

197 

202 

207 

207 

207 

208 

208 

209 

211 

211 

211 

211 

211 

212 

212 

212 

212 

213 

223 

223 

224 

224 

224 

224 

225 

225 

225 

225 

238 

238 

238 

238 

239 

239 

239 

240 

240 

251 

252 
VI 

Next Generation JSTARS ....................................... .. Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Survivability ................... .. Airborne Electronic Attack ................... .................................... . ................ . Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles ........................................................ . KC-46A ........................................................................... .. Beyond Line of Sight Command and Control ..................... . High Performance Computing ............ .................. . ....................... . Human Performance Monitoring .................... .. .............. . 

Liquid Rocket Engine Development Program .......................................... . Space Based Infrared System High ............................. . Air Force Technology Transfer Program ........................................... .. Global Positioning System Space Modernization Initiative ......................... . Global Positioning System User Equipment ....................... . ................... . Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide ......................... . Historicallf Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions 

Advanced nnovative Technologies ........................................................ . Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ..................... . .............. . Laser-Driven X-Ray Technology ................................................................. . Modeling and Simulation ........................................................................... .. Cybersecurity ................................................... . .................... . Human and Robot Collaboration ..................................... . Missile Defense Agency .............................................................................. .. Missile Defense Agency~Iron Dome ............................................................ . Missile Defense Agency-Cooperation with Universities ............ . Disabling and Neutralizing Weapons of Mass Destruction ................ . Additive Manufacturing ............... ..... . ..................... . Systems Engineering Research Center ....................... ,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,.,,, Conventional Prompt Global Strike .............................................................. . Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense ......... , ....... ,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, TITLE V. REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS ....................... . Defense Working Capital Funds ................................................ . TITLE VI. OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS ................ . 

DeJ~~~~;=~~i~Wufd!n~~·r~;·th·~··n~r~~~~-H~~~th·P~~-g.:~~-· ....................... . 

Carryover Authority ................................................... . ............................. . Electronic Health Record ............. ...... . ................... . Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program ............................... . Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research Programs ......................................... . Peer-Reviewed Prostate Cancer Research Program ....................... . Intelligent Prosthetics ................................ .. Prescription Drug Abuse ............................................. . Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy .................................................................... .. Childhood Trauma in Military Dependents ............. .. Air Force Military Acuity Model Training Program 

Trauma Clinical Research Repository .................... ................... . ............ .. Telemedicine .................... . Preservation of Muscle Mass During Immobilization Periods ..................... . 

Coc~fi~f:::~~ft}~i~~~s~~~ta.~~--~~~~~·~·1··~-~.~~~~~~~~.' .. ~.i-~.i-~~~~--~-~~~~~~-~-~~--~~~- Canine Therapy Research ................................ . ................ . Thermal Injury Prevention ................................................................ . Efficiency of Patient Care Delivery ................................................ . Military Mental Health Pilot Program .................. . Multi-Dis~linary Brain Research ........................................ . Access to ilitary Treatment Facilities ........................................ . Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities 

Budget Justification Material .................................................... .. National Guard State Plans ................................................................... . Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund .. .. Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund ............... .. .......................... . Support for International Sporting Competitions .......................................... .. Support for International Sporting Competitions ....................................... .. Office of the Inspector General . . .......................................................... . Office of the Inspector General ........ . ............................................... ,,,,,, TITLE VII. RELATED AGENCIES .. .. ................ . 

Page 

252 

253 

253 

253 

254 

254 

254 

254 

255 

255 

255 

256 

256 

256 

267 

267 

267 

267 

268 

268 

268 

268 

269 

270 

271 

271 

271 

271 

272 

275 

275 

277 

277 

281 

281 

281 

282 

283 

283 

284 

284 

284 

285 

285 

285 

286 

286 

286 

287 

287 

287 

287 

287 

288 

288 

288 

289 

289 

289 

290 

290 

290 

290 

291 

291 

293 
VII 

National and Military Intelligence Programs 

Classified Annex .............................................................................................. . Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund , ......... ,. Intelligence Community Management Account ................................................ . Wildlife Trafficking ........................... . ....... , .......... , .. ,,,,,,,,,,,,, .... .. TITLE VIII. GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................. . TITLE IX. OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS ...................... . Committee Recommendation ......................... ,,,,,,., ...... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .............. . General Provisions ... . ............................................................ . TITLE X ................................................................................................................... . HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ... . Changes in the Application of Existing Law ........................................... .. Appropriations not Authorized by Law ............ ....... . ............................... .. Transfer of Funds ................................... . .................. .. Rescissions .......................... ............... ... . . . . . . . . . . .. .. ............................ . Transfer of Unexpended Balances ..................................... . Directed Rule Making .......................... . .................... . Program Duplication ............................................................. . Statement of General Performance Goals and Objectives .............................. .. Compliance with Rule XIII, CL. 3(e) (Ramseyer Rule) ................................ . Earmark Disclosure Statement .......................................... .. ComQ_(_lrison with the Budget Resolution ............................... .. Five-Year Outlay Projections .................................. . ................ .. Financial Assistance to State and Local Governments 

Full Committee Votes 

Additional Views ....................................... . 

p,., 

293 

293 

293 

293 

294 

295 

305 

305 

305 

307 

307 

307 

318 

319 

321 

322 

322 

322 

322 

322 

322 

323 

323 

323 

323 

--

[.PUiolo '"QJUIIT'l!i:Jil J;laU~ 113TH CONGRESS} I REPORT 

2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 113-

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2015 

-f--, 2014.-Comrnitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN of New Jersey, from the Committee on 

Appropriations, submitted the following 

------

[To accompany H.R/---:----.. .. ----··· ··---~-N·-· ···-:-:--""7.--------

The Committee on Appropriations submits the following report in l ~ explanation of the accompanying bill making appropriations for the .........__ 

Department of Defense, and for other purposes, for the fiscal year ------· ending September 30, 2015. 

BILL TOTALS 

Appropriations for most military functions of the Department of 

Defense are provided for in the accompanying bill for fiscal year 

2015. This bill does not provide appropriations for military construction, military family housing, civil defense, and military nuclear warheads, for which requirements are considered in connection with other appropriations Acts. 

The President's fiscal year 2015 budget request for activities 

funded in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act totals 

$490,741,995,000 in new budget obligational authority for the base 

military bill. 

87-055 
/ 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND 

Title I - Military Personnel., .. 

T1tle II - Oper~ti~n and Maintenance. 

Title III - Procurement. , . , .. 

Title IV Research, Development, Test and 

Title V - Revolving and Hanagement Funds. 

Title VI - Other Department of Defense Progra~s .. 

Title VII -Related Agen<:ies.. . ... 

Title VIII - General Provisions (net) .......... . 

Tltle IX - Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). 

Total, Department of Defense. 

Scorekeeping adjustments ..... . 

T~tal Mandatory and discretionary. 

(~unts in Thousands) 

FV 2014 

Enacted 

565,093,629 

7,462,000 

572,555,629 

FY 2015 

Request 

570.700,995 

'Bi 11 

126,127,640 

-:64,631,636 

91,227.619 

63.362.890 

1,334,468 

33,795,719 

1,015,194 

958,4.52 

79,445,000 

563,698,620 

7,002,000 

Enacted 

·668 ,647 

1"4,761,912 

-1,633,481 

1"368, 149 

-911,959 

-1.239,447 

·27,035 

+3,737,641 

-5,581,942 

-1 '194,809 

-460,000 

-1,654,809 

Bill vs. 

Request 

-829,953 

-1,371,180 

+1,567,520 

-171.057 

+100,000 

-305,642 

-9,000 

+1,219,137 

+199.825 

+199,825 

"' 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

RECAPITULATION 

Title I - Military Personnel. 

Title II - Operation and Maintenance. 

Title III - Procurement. 

Title IV - Research, Development, Test and Evaluation. 

Title V - Revolving and Management Funds. 

Title VI - Other Department of Defense Programs .. 

Title VII - Related Agencies. 

Title VIII -General Provisions (net). 

Title IX - Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). 

Total, Department of Defense. 

Scorekeeping adjustments. 

Total mandatory and discretionary. 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014(report).rpd.t. -Filters: 1,0 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

128,796,287 

159,869,726 

92,861,300 

62,994,741 

2,246,427 

35,035,166 

1,042,229 

-2,779,189 

85,026,942 

FY 2015 

Request 

128,957,593 

166,002,818 

89,660,299 

63,533,947 

1,234,468 

34,101,361 

1,024,194 

-260,685 

79,445,000 

Bi 11 

128,127,640 

164,631,638 

91,227,819 

63,362,890 

1 '334' 468 

33,795,719 

1,015,194 

960,452 

79,445,000 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

-668,647 

+4,761 ,912 

-1,633,481 

•368' 149 

-911.959 

-1 ,239,447 

-27,035 

-f-3,739,641 

-5,581,942 

Bill vs. 

Request 

-829,953 

-1,371,180 

+1 ,567,520 

-171,057 

+100,000 

-305,642 

-9,000 

•1 '221 '137 

-------------· -------------- -------------- ----·--------· -------------- 565,093,629 563,698,995 563,900,820 -1,192,809 +201 ,825 

7,462,000 7,002,000 7,002,000 -460,000 

-------------- -------------- -------------- ------------ ----------- --- 572,555,629 570,700,995 570,902,820 -1,652,809 +201,825 

============== ============== ============== ============== ============== 

Defense 6/11/2014 10:21 AH Page: 14 
3 

COMMITTEE BUDGET REVIEW PROCESS 

During its review of the fiscal year 2015 budget request and execution of appropriations for fiscal year 2014, the Subcommittee on 

Defense held a total of thirteen hearings and eight formal briefings 

during the period from January 2014 to May 2014. Testimony received by the Subcommittee totaled 1,067 pages of transcript. Hearings were held in open session, except when the security classification of the material to be discussed presented no alternative but to 

conduct those hearings in executive or closed session. 

INTRODUCTION 

The Committee recommendation for the fiscal ~ear 20t5 Depart- A-4qo q~'3 ~20,000 -..... ment of ~efense base budget is $189,9 n,g~Q QQ , whiC is an in- \~ .\-10\ 1

"2-S 1000 J crease of $t~O,l\15,666 above the budget request. The Committee 

l recommendation for overseas contingency operations is 

$79,445,000,000. 

To reach the recommended level, the Subcommittee has reviewed 

in detail the budget request, and found areas and programs where 

reductions are possible without adversely impacting the warfighter 

or modernization and readiness efforts. Examples of such reductions include: programs which have been terminated or restructured since the budget was submitted, savings from favorable contract pricing adjustments, contract or schedule delays resulting in 

fiscal year 2015 savings, unjustified cost increases or funding requested ahead of need, anticipated or historical underexecution, rescissions of unneeded prior year funds, and reductions that are authorized in the pending National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2015. 

FUNDING INCREASES 

The Committee directs that the funding increases outlined in the 

tables for each appropriation account shall be provided only for the 

specific purposes indicated in the tables. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS BY MAJOR CATEGORY 

ACTIVE, RESERVE, AND NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY PERSONNEL 

In title I of the bill, the Committee recommends a total of 

$128,127,640,000 for active, reserve, and National Guard military 

personnel, a decrease of $829,953,000 below the budget request, 

and a decrease of $668,647,000 below the fiscal year 2014 enacted 

level. The Committee recommendation provides funding to increase 

basic pay for all military personnel by 1.8 percent, as authorized 

by current law, effective January 1, 2015. The Committee recommends full funding to support the requested end strength levels 

for active duty and Selected Reserve personnel. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

In title II of the bill, the Committee recommends a total of 

$164,631,638,000 for operation and maintenance support to the 

military Services and other Department of Defense entities, a decrease of $1,371,180,000 below the budget request, and an increase 

of $4,761,912,000 above the fiscal year 2014 enacted level. The recommended levels will robustly fund operational training programs 
4 

in fiscal year 2015. Requests for unit and depot-level maintenance, 

facilities sustainment, restoration and modernization, and base operations support program funding have been fully supported. 

PROCUREMENT 

In title III of the bill, the Committee recommends a total of 

$91,227,819,000 for procurement. 

Major initiatives and modifications include: 

$1,356,227,000 for the procurement of 87 UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters, an increase of $119,226,000 and eight aircraft above the 

President's request. $892,504,000 for the procurement of 32 CH-4 7 Chinook helicopters, the same as the President's request. $239,581,000 for the procurement of 19 improved, longer range 

MQ-1 unmanned aerial vehicles, an increase of $49,000,000 above 

the President's request. 

$532,605,000 for the procurement of 97 MSE missiles for the Patriot missile system, an increase of $148,000,000 above the President's request. 

$183,838,000 for the procurement of Patriot Missile modifications, an increase of $52,000,000 above the President's request. 

$664,087,000 for the procurement of WIN-T Ground Forces Tactical Networks, a decrease of $99,000,000 below the President's request. 

$125,711,000 for the procurement of Joint Tactical Radio Systems, a decrease of $50,000,000 below the President's request. $416,617,000 for the procurement of 55 UH-72A Lakota helicopters, the same as the President's request. 

$435,110,000 for the procurement of upgrades for the fourth brigade set of Strykers to double V-hulls, plus Stryker nuclear, biological, chemical reconnaissance vehicle fielding support, an increase of $50,000,000 above the President's request. 

$122,451,000 for the procurement of 40 M88A2 Improved Recovery Vehicles, an increase of $72,000,000 and 25 vehicles above the 

President's request. 

$1,018,547,000 for the procurement of twelve EA-18G Growler 

electronic attack aircraft, an increase of $975,000,000 and twelve 

aircraft above the President's request. 

$2,128,787,000 for the procurement of nine P-6A Poseidon multimission aircraft, an increase of $125,460,000 and one aircraft above 

the President's request. 

$809,057,000 for the l'rocurement of 27 UH-1Y/AH-1Z helicopters, an increase of $30,300,000 and one aircraft above the 

President's request. 

$5,843,108,000 for the procurement of 38 F-35 Lightning aircraft, an increase of $479,000,000 and four aircraft above the President's request: six short take-off and vertical landing variants for 

the Marine Corps, four carrier variants for the Navy, and 28 conventional variants for the Air Force. 

$14,256,361,000 for the procurement of six Navy ships, including 

two DDG-51 guided missile destroyers, two SSN-77 4 attack submarines, and two Littoral Combat Ships. $789,300,000 above the President's request for the advance procurement of material for the refueling of the USS George Washington (CVN-73). 
5 

$1,097,691,000 for the procurement of 14 CIHC/MC/KC-130J aircraft, the same as the President's request. 

$1,481,100,000 for the procurement of 19 MV-22 aircraft, a decrease of $5,900,000 below the President's request. 

$373,218,000 for the procurement of 24 MQ-9 Reaper unmanned 

aerial vehicles, an increase of $133,000,000 and 12 aircraft above 

the President's request. 

$1,582,685,000 for the procurement of seven KC-46 tanker aircraft, the same as the President's request. 

$1,346,046,000 for the procurement of three Evolved Expendable 

Launch Vehicles and infrastructure, a decrease of $35,000,000 

below the President's request. 

$350,972,000 for the Israeli Cooperative Program Iron Dome, 

$175,000,000 above the President's request. 

$100,000,000 for HMMWV modernization for the Army National 

Guard, an increase of $100,000,000 above the President's request. 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION 

In title IV of the bill, the Committee recommends a total of 

$63,362,890,000 for research, development, test and evaluation. 

Major initiatives and modifications include: 

$181,609,000 for the continued development of High Performance 

Computing, the same as the President's request. 

$320,177,000 for the continued development of modifications to 

Abrams, Bradley, and Stryker Vehicles, an increase of $25,000,000 

above the President's request. 

$849,277,000 for the continued development of the replacement 

for the Ohio class ballistic missile submarine, the same as the 

President's request. 

$146,200,000 for the continued development of the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft, a decrease of $47,000,000 below the 

President's request. 

$230,733,000 for the continued development of the Next Generation Jammer, a decrease of $16,123,000 below the President's request. 

$1,636,130,000 for the continued development of the F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter aircraft, a decrease of $4,976,000 below 

the President's request. 

$403,017,000 for the continued development of the Unmanned 

Carrier Based Strike System, the same as the President's request. 

$319,037,000 for the continued development of the Multi-mission 

Maritime Aircraft, an increase of $11,000,000 above the President's 

request. 

$913,728,000 for the development of a new penetrating bomber, 

the same as the President's request. 

$766,937,000 for the continued development of the Next Generation Aerial Refueling Aircraft, a decrease of $10,000,000 below the 

President's request. 

$73,088,000 for the development of a Next Generation JSTARS 

aircraft, the same as the President's request. 

$309,501,000 for the continued development of the Space Based 

Infrared Satellite and associated ground support systems, a decrease of $10,000,000 below the President's request. 
6 

$212,571,000 for the development of the Global Positioning System III operational control segment, the same as the President's request. 

$220,000,000 above the President's request to begin development 

of a domestically produced liquid rocket engine for space launch. 

$2,848,318,000 for the Defense Advanced Research Projects 

Agency, a decrease of $66,452,000 below the President's request. 

$268,842,000 for the Israeli Cooperative Programs, an increase of 

$172,039,000 above the President's request. 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

The Committee recommends a total of $31,634,870,000 for the 

Defense Health Program to support worldwide medical and dental 

services for active forces and other eligible beneficiaries. 

The Committee recommends funding to augment the request for 

enduring traumatic brain injury, psychological health, and wounded, ill and injured requirements. To address these challenges of the 

Defense Health Program, the Committee recommends the following: 

Traumatic brain injury and psychological health research , Peer-reviewed spinal cord research ......................... . 

Peer-reviewed orthopedic research ... ., ................................................ . 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

$125,000,000 

$30,000,000 

$30,000,000 

In title IX of the bill, the Committee recommends a total of 

$79,445,000,000 for overseas contingency operations. Despite a recent announcement from the Administration regarding plans for an 

enduring military presence in Afghanistan, no Overseas Contingency Operations budget request has been submitted, therefore this 

level of funding is subject to change. 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

As described elsewhere in this report, the Committee's budget review of classified programs is published in a separate, detailed, and 

comprehensive classified annex. Adjustments to the classified programs are addressed in the classified annex accompanying this 

report. 
TITLE I 

MILITARY PERSONNEL 

The fiscal year 2015 Department of Defense military personnel 

budget request totals $128,957,593,000. The Committee recommendation provides $128,127,640,000 for the military personnel 

accounts. The table below summarizes the Committee recommendations: 

(7) 
RECAPJTULATION 

HlLJTARV PERSONNEL, """ MILITARY PERSONNEL, '-IAVY. 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARH~E CORPS. 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE, 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARIIY. 

RESERVE PERSONNEL NA'I'I'. 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE. 

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARHY 

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

GA.AMD TOTAL, IULITARY PERSONNEL 

8 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHAHGE fR{)N 

REQUEST RECOHMEKOEO REQUEST 

" ,225,339 41 '163, 129 -41 ,610 

,, 489,440 27 '387. 344 -102,096 

" 919,103 " "' '" -133,672 

" 815,926 " 564 "' -251,584 

4S9, 130 304 "' -154 '" 1.663.034 I ,836,024 ·27 "' 

610,754 659,224 ., '530 

.675.518 1.652,148 ·23 370 

682,892 7,644,832 -38,260 

3,156,457 3,110,567 -45' 670 

------------ ------------ 128,957,593 128,127,640 -829,953 

.... ~ ....... ~ .. ==" "'""'"""'"'""""" """"""""""=" 
9 

MILITARY PERSONNEL OVERVIEW 

The Committee recommendation provides $128,127,640,000 for 

the military personnel accounts, which funds military pay and allowances, recruitment and retention initiatives, and overall quality 

of life programs for active duty, reserve, and National Guard personneL The recommendation fully supports the resource requirements needed to maintain the authorized end strength levels for 

fiscal year 2015. The Committee recommendation provides funding 

to increase basic pay for all military personnel by 1.8 percent as 

authorized by current law, effective January 1, 2015. The Committee continues to encourage constructive evaluations of recruitment and retention programs, bonus and special pay incentives, 

and personnel benefit programs for fiscal year 2015. The Committee remains supportive of programs intended to enhance the 

morale and quality of life of military personnel and their families. 

SUMMARY OF END STRENGTH 

The fiscal year 2015 budget request includes a decrease of 52,800 

in total end strength for the active forces and a decrease of 12,900 

in total end strength for the Selected Reserve as compared to the 

fiscal year 2014 authorized levels. The following tables summarize 

the Committee recommendations for end strength levels, both in 

the aggregate and for each active and Selected Reserve component. 

OVERALL ACTIVE END STRENGTH 

Fiscal year 2014 authorized ................... . .............................. . 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ..................................................... . Fiscal year 2015 recommendation ................................................... . Compared with fiscal year 2014 ....... .. ...................... . Compared with fiscal year 2015 budget request .................... .. 

OVERALL SELECTED RESERVE END STRENGTH 

Fiscal year 2014 authorized .......................................................... .. Fiscal year 2015 budget request .................................................... . Fiscal year 2015 recommendation ................................................ . Compared with fiscal year 2014 ............................................. .. Compared with fiscal year 2015 budget request ................ .. 

SUMMARY OF MILITARY PERSONNEL ENO STRENGTH 

frscal year 2015 

frscal year 

2014 Sud gel Commrttee Change from authorired request recommended requesl 

Actr~e Forces :End Strength) 

Army 520.000 490,000 490,000 

'""' 323,600 323,600 323,600 Manne Corps 190,200 184,100 184,100 

Air Force 327,600 310,900 310,900 

Total. Active Forces 1,361,400 1.308,600 1,308.600 

Guard and Reserve Forces (End Strength) 

Arm~ Reserve .. 205,000 202,000 202,000 

Navy Reserve . 59,100 57,300 57,300 

Marine Corps Reserve . 39,600 39,200 39,200 

Air Force Reser~e . 70,400 67,100 67.100 

Army National Guard . 354,200 350,200 350,200 

Air Natwnal Guard . 105,400 105,000 105.000 

1,361,400 

1,308,600 

1,308,600 

-52,800 

833,700 

820,800 

820,800 

-12,900 

Change hom 

ltstal year 

2014 

~ 30,000 

-6,100 

- 16.700 

-52,800 

-3,000 

-1,800 

-400 

-3,300 

-4.000 

-400 
10 

SUMMARY OF MILITARY PERSONNEL END STRENGTH-Conlinued 

Total, Selected Reserve . 

Total, Militaf'/ Personnel . 

F1scal year 

2014 authorired Budget 

request 

F1scal year 2015 

Commrttee Change from recommended r~quest 

833.700 820,800 820,800 

2,195,100 2,129,400 2,129,400 

FULL-TIME SUPPORT STRENGTHS 

Change hom liscal rear 

2014 

- 12,900 

- 65,700 

There are four categories of full-time support in the National 

Guard and reserve components: military technicians (dual status), 

Active Guard and Reserve, non-technician civilians, and active 

component personnel. 

Full-time support personnel organize, recruit, train, maintain, 

and administer the reserve components. Military technicians (dual 

status) directly support units and are critical to helping units 

maintain readiness and meet the wartime missions of the Army 

and Air Force. 

The following table summarizes the National Guard and reserve 

components full-time support end strengths: 

SUMMARY OF GUARD AND RESERVE FULL-TIME SUPPORT 

frscal year 2015 

Frscaltear 2014 Bll11get Commrttoo Change from Change from 

authomed frscal year request recommended request 2014 

Army Reserve· 

AGR .. 16,261 16,261 16,261 

le\:hnician~ 8,395 7,895 7,895 - 500 

Navy Reserve: 

AR. 10,159 9,973 9,973 -· 186 

Marine Corps Reserve: 

AR 2,261 2,261 2,261 

Air Force Reserve. 

AGR . 2.911 2.830 2,830 -81 

Techn1c1ans . l0.429 9.789 9,789 -640 

Army Nat1onal Guard: 

AGR .. 32,060 31,385 31,385 -675 

Techn1c1ans . 27.210 27,210 27,210 

Air Nat1onal Guard: 

AGR 14,734 14,704 14,704 -30 

Technic1ans 21.875 21,792 21,792 -83 

Totals 

AGR/AR . 78,386 77,414 77.414 -972 

Technicians 67.909 66,686 66,686 -1,223 

Total. Full" Time Support . 146,295 144,100 144,100 -2,195 

REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR MILITARY PERSONNEL ACCOUNTS 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit the 

Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414) for each of the fiscal year 

2015 appropriation accounts not later than 60 days after the enactment of this Act. The Secretary of Defense is prohibited from executing any reprogramming or transfer of funds for any purpose 
11 

other than originally appropriated until the aforementioned report 

is submitted to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to use the normal prior approval reprogramming procedures to transfer funds in 

the Services' military personnel accounts between budget activities 

in excess of $10,000,000. 

SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS 

Items for which additional funds have been provided or items for 

which funding has been reduced as shown in the project level tables or in paragraphs using the phrase "only for" or "only to" in the 

Committee report are congressional interest items for the purpose 

of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of these 

items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated amount 

specifically addressed in the Committee report. Below threshold 

reprogrammings may not be used to either restore or reduce funding from congressional interest items as identified on the DD Form 

1414. These items remain special interest items whether or not 

they are repeated in a subsequent conference report. 

SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE 

The Committee remains concerned by reports of sexual assaults 

being committed by those in key positions of trust, including sexual 

assault response coordinators, victim advocates, military recruiters, 

commanders, and military leaders. The Army recently conducted a 

review of personnel serving in key positions of trust, and almost 

600 soldiers currently serving in those positions were disqualified 

for infractions. While the Committee commends the Army for conducting such a review and holding soldiers accountable and urges 

the other Services to conduct similar comprehensive reviews, it remains disturbed that so many of the personnel currently serving 

should never have qualified for those duties. 

The Committee is also concerned by the persistently high prevalence of sexual assault at the military academies. The Committee 

believes that more must be done to institute best practices at the 

military academies, training bases, and recruiting commands to increase prevention efforts as well as to preclude perpetrators from 

serving in influential and sensitive occupations. While the Service 

Secretaries must be aggressive in prosecuting and punishing per· 

petrators of sexual assault, they must increase their efforts to pro· 

teet servicemembers from the threat of sexual assault in the first 

place. Further, commanders remain responsible for ensuring good 

order and discipline in their units and should be held responsible 

when crimes are committed under their watch. Recent allegations 

that commanders ignored reports of sexual assault or permitted inappropriate work environments in violation of Service sexual bar· 

assment and hazing policies is extremely concerning and must not 

be tolerated. 

The Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 provided an additional $25,000,000 to expand the Special Victims' 

Counsel (SVC) program to all Services. This program provides legal 

representatives to give advice and representation to sexual assault 

victims. The SVC helps navigate victims through the legal process 

and intervenes on a victim's behalf when appropriate. The Com-
12 

mittee understands that the Air Force SVC pilot program has 

shown success in assisting victims throughout the process and believes victims throughout the military will benefit by having access 

to a SVC. The Committee is pleased to learn that an expansion of 

the program is underway and it fully funds the budget request for 

the SVC program. 

The recommendation also includes a provision requested by the 

President to make funds available for the Services, including the 

National Guard and reserve components, to support high priority 

Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program requirements 

and activities, including the training and funding of personnel. In 

addition, the Committee fully funds the budget request for Sexual 

Assault Prevention and Response programs and encourages the 

Secretary of Defense and the Service Chiefs to do more to stop this 

destructive epidemic in the military. 

LONG-TERM TEMPORARY DUTY ASSIGNMENTS 

The report accompanying the House version of the Department 

of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 included language which expressed the Committee's concern related to reports 

of Services sending personnel on long-term temporary duty assignments (TDY) that do not comply with the regulations as stated in 

the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR). The JFTR states that 

long-term TDY assignments must be temporary in nature, of reasonable time duration, lower in cost than round-trip permanent 

change of station expenses, and not to exceed 180 consecutive days. 

The Committee continues to believe that the practice of sending personnel on extended TDYs that violate the JFTR would be both 

a waste of taxpayer resources and a violation of Department-wide 

rules and regulations. Further, the Committee is concerned that 

the Special Operations Command's (SOCOM) growing use of continuous rotational TDYs is being used to establish permanent persistent presences in countries overseas. The Committee understands that with limited exception, SOCOM currently lacks the 

legal authority to establish and maintain a permanent persistent 

presence globally and therefore questions whether the use of continuous rotational TDY s is being used in lieu of seeking the necessary legal authorities. The Committee also questions whether 

this practice violates the JFTR, limitations on billets in combatant 

command positions, requirements for dwell time, and Department 

and interagency policies and procedures regarding the establishment of permanent assignments overseas. 

The Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 directed 

the Secretary of Defense to evaluate the use of extended TDYs and 

to submit a report to the congressional defense committees on the 

practice and its compliance with the JFTR. The Committee directs 

the Secretary of Defense to include as part of his report a comprehensive look into SOCOM's use of continuous rotational TDYs. 

The Committee is currently waiting for the completion and release 

of the report and looks forward to reviewing its recommendations. 

PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION EFFICIENCIES 

The Consolidated Appropriations Acts for fiscal years 2013 and 

2014 recommended total reductions of almost $300,000,000 in the 
13 

Permanent Change of Station (PCS) budget activities for program 

efficiencies. In addition, the Consolidated Appropriations Act for 

fiscal year 2014 directed the Department of Defense Inspector General to conduct a review of the military personnel PCS program 

and to identify potential cost savings and efficiencies that could be 

implemented throughout the program. 

In its report, the Inspector General found that the Department 

of Defense, the United States Transportation Command, and the 

Services were taking a number of steps in response to congressional direction to find cost savings and efficiencies within the PCS 

program. These include using upgraded systems that better monitor moves to ensure they meet regulations regarding weight and 

cost requirements, implementing logistics efficiencies through regionalization and operations consolidations, and improving internal 

controls to increase fidelity of accounting data to identify areas for 

future cost savings. The Committee commends the Secretary of Defense and the Service Secretaries for their efforts to improve accountability and oversight and reduce waste in the PCS program. 

At the same time, the Inspector General found multiple areas 

where additional cost savings and efficiencies could be found. These 

include transferring financial responsibility and payment for nontemporary storage after the entitlement period has ended, establishing controls to ensure overpayments for shipping household 

goods are recouped by the Services, using less costly methods to 

ship and store domestic household goods weighing 1,000 pounds or 

less, reviewing policies regarding unlimited weight limits for local 

moves, reviewing policies regarding the use of certain flights for 

servicemember PCS travel, and implementing a statutory incentive 

for servicemembers to voluntarily reduce the weight of shipped 

goods. 

The Committee supports the findings of the Inspector General report and directs the Secretary of Defense and Service Secretaries 

to review and implement the recommendations as soon as possible. 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit a report 

on the status of implementation of the recommendations and the 

estimated cost savings associated with implementation to the congressional defense committees not later than 120 days after the enactment of this Act. 

CULTURAL SENSITIVITY TRAINING 

The Committee recognizes that the Department of Defense and 

the Services have multiple cultural sensitivity training programs 

for military personnel. The Committee believes that protecting 

servicemembers' rights regarding religious exercise and ethnic heritage is important. The Committee supports efforts to identify resource and personnel gaps that may exist in the Department of Defense Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity, as 

well as efforts to identify existing gaps in protections for new and 

prospective servicemembers. 

HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY OF MILITARY SERVICE STATIONS 

The Committee recognizes that while efforts to improve services 

for handicapped patrons on Department of Defense installations 

have been made, the layout and design of Army and Air Force Ex-
14 

change Service (AAFES) gas stations limits accessibility for many 

handicapped patrons. While some service stations have installed 

call buttons to allow patrons to ring for assistance, the buttons 

often are not clearly marked or are difficult to utilize. The Committee understands that AAFES is undertaking a pilot study to redesign and install new service call systems and encourages the continued efforts to improve handicapped accessibility. 

PERSONNEL TRANSITION COORDINATION 

As the Department of Defense reduces the size of the force, the 

Committee supports efforts to assist military personnel in 

leveraging their unique skills and experiences as they transition 

from military to civilian life. The Committee urges the Secretary of 

Defense, in partnership with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

state and local government representatives, non-governmental organization leaders, and private sector leaders, to continue efforts to 

increase employment opportunities for former servicemembers, including in fields related to disaster relief. 

MINORITY OUTREACH AND OFFICER ACCESSIONS 

Minorities remain underrepresented in the general officer ranks 

across the Services. To build a more diverse organization, the Committee supports efforts to conduct effective outreach and recruiting 

programs focused on increasing officer accessions in minority communities and encourages the Secretary of Defense and the Service 

Secretaries to support efforts to improve diversity in the military. 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ................................................. ,...... $40,787,967,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ... 41,225,339,000 

Committee recommendation ..................... ............................. 41,183,729,000 

Change from budget request ............................................ -41,610,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $41,183,729,000 

for Military Personnel, Army. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
15 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSA~DS) 

50 M!LlTARY PERSONNEL, ARMY 

100 ACTIVITY I PIW AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

150 BASIC PAY. 

200 RETIRED PA'I ACCRUAL. 

250 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING. 

300 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 

350 INCENTIVE PAYS 

400 SPECIAL PAYS 

450 ALLOWANC~S. 

500 SEPARATION PA'I. 

550 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX. 

600 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY I . 

650 ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNH 

700 BASIC PAY. 

750 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 

600 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR tiOUSING. 

850 lNCENTTVE PAYS. 

900 SPECIAL PAYS. 

950 ALLOWANCES 

1000 SEPARATION PAY. 

1050 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 

1100 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIYJTV :2. 

1150 ACTIVJTY J: PAY AND ALLOO.OANCES OF CADETS 

1200 ACAOEitY CADETS. 

1:250 ACT!VlT'( 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

1300 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE. 

1350 SUB$! STENCE ·til· KINO 

I 400 FAHIL Y SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEI'IENTAL ALLOWANCE 

I 450 TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 

BUDGET COMIIITTEE CHANGE FA~ 

REQUEST RECONMENDEO REQUEST 

6,T15,420 B,715,420 

'" "' 090 ... "' . 307 "' . 307 

279, "' "' "' 98, "' " "' 

"' "' 376 '007 ·2.000 

212,394 '" 394 

.. "' " . .. "' '069 511 ,069 

............ 

" 581 . 3B9 1:2,579 '" ·2,000 

" 019,805 13,019 BOO 

4,070.370 4,070 '" 4, 870 591 4' 870 "' 

'"' '" '"' "' .. , "' .. , "' ·1 ,000 

869' 004 "' 004 

320' 348 "' ,., 99B,015 '" "' ............ 

24.713,604 ,. 712,60~ ·1 .000 

78. 2JB 79.236 

1,284,943 1,264,643 

590 "' "' '" \. 31B 1 '" I ,681 '324 I ,881 '324 
16 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

1500 ACTIVITY 5, Pt:RMAMENT CMANGE OF STATION 

1 S50 ACCESSION TAAVEL. 

1600 TRAINING TRAVEL 

1650 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 

1700 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 

1750 SEPARATION TRAVEL. 

1900 TRAVEL OF ORGAMIZEO UNITS .. 

1900 TE~PORARY LODGING EXPENSE 

19~0 TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 

;?:OQC ACTIVIT\' 6: OTHER MlllTAIIY PERSONNEL COSTS 

2050 APPREHENSION OF MILITAIIV DESERTERS 

2100 INTEREST OH UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS. 

2150 DEATH GRATUITIES 

2200 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS. 

2250 EDUCATION O€NEFITS 

2300 ADOPTII)tl EXPENSES 

2360 RESERVE INCOME REPLACEI1E~T PROGRAM. 

2410 SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYHENTS 

2450 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC). 

2551) TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVIT\' 6. 

2600 LESS REIMBURSABLE$ 

2700 TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES. ARHY. 

6300 TOTAL. HlLlTAR'i PERSONNEL, ARNY. 

BUDGET COMMITIEE CHAIIGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

142' 048 140,648 -1 .400 

14~ ,951 144,951 

412,092 412,092 

758.069 758,069 

293. 377 293,377 

4.043 4.043 

10.997 10,997 

37.301 37.301 

------------ .!02.878 I ,801 .478 -1 ,400 

1 .033 1 ,033 

1 .339 1 ,338 

" . 700 " '700 

222,586 222,586 

"' "' 5.070 5.070 

'" '" 

"' . 068 '" ·'" 

" "' " "' 

"' '" 436.260 

-289 '" -289,352 

-37.210 

~1 .225.339 41.183,729 ·41 ,610 

41,225,339 41,183,729 
M-1 

17 

!XPLANA.llON OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

{In thouaanda af dol Ia,.] 

BA·1: PAY ANO ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

SPECIAL PAYS 

Pi'Oj&ded \lllderexeeutlcm 

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENUSTED 

PERSONNEL 

SPECIAL PAYS 

Projected undereJteO.Jtion 

BA.f: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAveL 

ACCESSION TRAVEL 

Unjustified Increase 

UNDISTRIBUTEO ADJUSTMENTS 

Unobligat&dfi.Jm!Xpended balances 

Funding exte•• to requirement 

...... 

Reqt~nl 

378,007 

462,722 

142,041 

Committee 

Re<rommended 

376,007 

·2.000 

461,722 

-1,000 

140,648 

-1,400 

-37,210 

-28,210 

~.000 

Changa from 

Reguut 

-2:,000 

-1,000 

-1,400 

-37,210 
18 

REGIONALLY ALIGNED FORCES LANGUAGE CAPABILITY 

The Committee supports efforts to improve foreign language capabilities for Army regionally aligned forces in order to increase 

soldiers' effectiveness when conducting joint operations and training and mentoring foreign military leaders. The Committee is concerned that an insufficient number of soldiers are receiving foreign 

language training and encourages the Secretary of the Army to review how many officers and non-commissioned officers with foreign 

language skills it needs to meet the regionally aligned forces requirement. 

MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING AT CAMP HUMPHREYS 

The Committee supports the agreement between the United 

States and the Republic of Korea to consolidate most U.S. forces at 

Camp Humphreys, Korea. The Commander of United States Forces 

Korea (USFK) currently has a requirement that 40 percent of the 

authorized command sponsored famHics must reside on-post to 

meet operational and force protection needs, but there is a significant shortage in planned on-post family housing as compared to 

the requirement. The Committee strongly supports efforts to increase the current and future inventory of on-post family housing 

to meet the command requirement and urges the Secretary of the 

Army, the Secretary of Defense, and the Commander of USFK to 

work together to find a solution that will satisfy the requirement 

in a fiscally responsible and sustainable manner. 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ................. ...... ............ $27,231,512,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .............................................. 27,489,440,000 

Committee recommendation . ..................... ................. 27,387,344,000 

Change from budget request . . . ................ -102,096,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $27,387,344,000 

for Military Personnel, Navy. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
19 

IDOLLAAS IN THOUSANDS) 

6400 M!LlTAI!Y PERSONNEL, NAVY 

6450 ACTIVITY 1 · f>A'I' AND ALLOWANCES OF (}ffiCER$ 

6500 BASIC PAY. 

6550 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL. 

6600 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING. 

6650 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE. 

6700 INCENTIVE PAYS 

6750 SPECIAL PAYS. 

6800 ALLOWANCES 

6850 SEPARATION PAY 

6900 SOCIAL SECURITY TAl(. 

5950 TOTAL. SUOGET ACTIVITY I 

7000 ACTIVITY 2 f>AY AND "LLOWANCES Of ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

7050 BASIC PAY. 

7100 RfTlRED PAY ACCRUAL. 

7200 INCENTTYE PII.YS 

7250 SPECIAL PAYS .. 

7300 ALLOWANCES. 

7350 SEPAAATlO"' P/W. 

7400 SOCIAl SECURITY TAX. 

7450 TOTAL, BUr;K;ET ACTIVITY 2, 

7500 ACTIVITY J· PAY ANO ALLOWANCES OF HIDSHIPHEN 

7550 HlOSH!PHEN 

7600 ACTIVITY 4 SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEl 

7650 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE, 

7700 SUBSISTENCE-IN·KIND. 

7150 FA11ll'l' SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEHENTAL ALLOWAtiCE, 

7800 TOTA.L, OUOGET ACTIVITY 4. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHA!IGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOHHEHDED REQUEST 

4,017,362 4,017,362 

1,255,535 1,255,535 

1.433.673 1 ,433 "' 184.566 '" '" 121 .na "' 220 

429,454 429' "' 1l3,982 "' "' 59.026 59.026 

305,463 305' 463 

1' 918.281 7,915,536 -745 

6,614,658 8.614,658 

2.695. 729 2,695, 72.9 

3,878,513 3,878,513 

104.072 104.0!2 

793,222 790,411 -2,611 

594,908 584' 1108 -10,000 

223' 362 223,362 

659.021 659.021 

17,563,465 17,550,674 -12,811 

" 003 78 ,1)93 

"' '" 759 '490 

'" 060 ., .060 

1.190.~56 1.190,556 
20 

(DOLlARS IM TMOUSANOSI 

7850 ACTIVITV 5 · PERHANENT Cf-IA~GE OF STATTON 

7900 ACCESSION Tlt\VEl. 

7950 TRAUHNG TRAVEL 

8000 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 

8050 ROTATIONAL TRAVEL 

8100 SEPARATION TRAVEL. 

8150 TRAVEL OF ORGAN12EO UNrTS,. 

0200 NON- TE~PORARY STORAGE. 

8250 TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE •. 

0300 OTHER. 

8350 TOTAl. bUOGET ACTIVITY 5. 

8400 ACTIVITY 8: OTHER IHLITARY PERSONNEL COSTS 

8~50 APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS 

8500 INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SEI!VICES SAVINGS 

8~50 DEATH GRATU!Tl[S 

8600 UNEI'IPLOYNFNT BFNEF!TS 

6650 EPUCAHON BENEFHS. 

9700 ADOPTION EXPENSES. 

8750 TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY. 

8800 PARTIAL OlSlOCATION ALLOWANCE 

0900 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINI'IG CORPS (ROTC). 

0950 JUNIOR ROTC 

9000 TOTAL. BUDGET ACTJVITY 6. 

0050 LESS REI"BURSABLES 

9100 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTHENT. 

9200 TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, ~AllY. 

1 1000 TOTAL, l'tlL!TARY PER$0NNEL, W.VY. 

BUDGET COMI'IITTEE CHANGE 

REQUEST RECOI'IMENIJ.EO REQUEST '"'"

'" "' 66,416 

.. ,., 98,5H 

"' '" 253,140 

"' ,252 271,2&2 

"' "' 133,912 

" ,489 41 ,469 

1 ,982 1 ,982 

6.708 6,708 

3,581 3,561 

---·--·-··-- 899.007 699,007 

" " 1 '664 1.664 

17,400 17,400 

112,881 , 12,681 

20. 495 20.495 

m m 

4,053 4,053 

" " 

" ,584 21 ,584 

" "' 12.312 

190.796 190.798 

·346. 792 -346,762 

• 88,640 ·88,540 

::::na:zn" ... "'""'""'""•" z~••=B•.,•=•B 

21.~69.440 27,JS7,J4• ·102,096 

27.469. 44{1 27,387,3H -102,096 

:::====:==== ===="""""~~" """"""""""'"" 
M·1 

21 

EXPL.ANAOON OF PROJECT I..EVEL. ADJUSTMENTS 

lin thoUMncil: of lfoU11'11! 

Budget Committee 

Rtlqunt Reeomm~Mct.d 

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OfFICERS 

SPECIAL PAYS 

NallY identified e~cee.a 1o ~?~(!Virement 

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED 

PERSONNEL 

SPECIAL PAYS 

Navy Identified e~oeu to requirement 

ALLOWANCES 

Navy Identified exoen to JeqUirement 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT 

UnobligeledNne~pended baJanoeJ 

429,454 

793,222 

594,908 

428,709 

-1-45 

790,411 

·2,811 

584,908 

-10,000 

-88,540 

-88.540 

-745 

-2,1111 

-10,000 
22 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ........... ...................... $12,766,099,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ......... ............................................. 12,919,103,000 

Committee recommendation .... .......................................... 12,785,431,000 

Change from budget request ........... ........................... - 133,672,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $12,785,431,000 

for Military Personnel, Marine Corps. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
23 

(DOLLARS It< THOUSANDS) 

12000 11lltTARV PERSONNEL, "AAIUE CORPS 

12050 ACHVJTY 1 PAY AND ALLO\oiANCES OF OFFICERS 

12100 BASIC PAY 

12150 RETIRED PAY 1\CCRU/\L 

12200 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOIJSJIIG,., 

12250 BASIC /I.LLOWMICE FOR SUBSISTENCE. 

12300 INCENTIVE PAYS 

123~0 SPECIAL PAYS 

12400 ALLOWANCES. 

12430 SEPARATION PAY. 

12500 SOCIAL SECURITY TA.X 

12550 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 

12tiUO ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALL()oLIINCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

12650 BASIC PAY 

12700 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL 

12750 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING. 

12800 INCENTIVE PAYS. 

1~650 SPECIAL PAYS 

12900 ALLOWANCES 

12950 SEPARATION PAY. 

1JOOO SOCJ,O.,L SECURlTI' TAX. 

13050 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVIT'/ 2. 

13100 ACTIVITY 4 SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED P'[RSONNEL 

13150 BASIC ALLO\oJANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 

1n00 SLIBSISTENCE-JN-KIND,. 

13250 FAMILY SUBSISTEtiCE SUPPLeMENTII.l ALLOWANCE. 

1 JJCC TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY .t. 

t'IUDGfT CD""lTTEE CHAPIG€ FR~ 

~EQliEST !!ECO"MHIDED REQUEST 

1,489,996 1,490,623 +627 

464' 468 484,468 

.f92, 488 492' 488 

63.449 63,449 

38.223 38,223 

5.927 5,92T 

32 '063 32.083 

13,593 1J. 593 

113,239 113,239 

2.713,468 2,714,093 +627 

4,825,078 4,831 ,139 

1.~02,784 1 ,502 '" 1 ,669 "' 1,869,844 

g. 946 9.946 

'" . 002 111.002 

'" "' 288.268 

" '" 64.343 

'" "' 368,511 

8,860 777 866,638 +6,061 

4~2,568 442. 559 

353, COB 353' 006 

" " 195' 575 785.~75 
24 

jrlOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

13350 ACTIVITY 5: PERI\ANENT CHIINGE OF STATION 

13400 ACCESSION TRAVEL 

13450 TRAINING TRAVEL 

13500 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 

13550 ROTATIONAL TRIIVEL 

13600 SEPARATlON TRAVU, 

t 3650 TRAVEL OF ORGAN !ZED UNITS. 

13700 NON- TEMPORAR'I' STORAGE. 

13750 TEHPOAARY LODGING EXPENSE. 

13800 OTI'\ER 

13850 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5. 

13900 ACTIVITY 6: OTHtR 11ILITAI!Y PERSONNEL COSTS 

13!150 APPREHENSION OF 1'\!LITARY DESERTERS. 

14000 HITEREST ON UNIFOR'IEtl SERVICES SAVINGS 

140~ DEATH GR.I.TUITIES. 

14100 UNEHPLOYHENT BEKEFITS 

14150 EDUCATION BENEFITS. 

14~00 ADOPTION E)(PENSES. 

14250 TRAHS?OIHATIOM SUBSIDY. 

14300 PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE. 

14400 JUNIOR ROTC 

14450 TOTAL, BUDGET .O.CTIYITY 6. 

14500 LESS REl"BURSilBL£5. 

14600 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMHH. 

14650 TOTAL ACTIVE FORCES. MARINE CORPS 

16000 TOTAL, MILITARY PERSOHHEL, ~ARIHE CORPS. 

BUDGET COHti!TTEE CHANGE FRO" 

REQUEST RECOHHENilED REQUEST 

4Q' 622 411,622 

27. 481 27,481 

168,432 16!L432 

99,931 99,931 

82,065 82,065 

"' "' 5,064 5,064 

11 ,841 11 ,841 

3.056 3,056 

448.277 ... m 

'" '" 

" " 11 ,400 " '"' 101,839 "' "' 7,000 7.000 

.. .. 1 '527 1 .527 

" " 3,910 910 

"' "' 126.460 

-25 "' ·25,452 

·140.360 -U0,-360 

E:O<c:0::>::02~=~ ""====:~:n= •"'""'n""""""' 

12,919.103 12.765,431 -133.672 

12,919.103 12.785,431 -133.612 
25 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

On th01.111nds of doll•rtl 

BA-1: PAV AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

BASIC PAY 

Marine Corps unturded requlremem ·Special Purpoae 

Martna Air Ground Task Foree- CENTCOM and 

SOUTH COM 

BA·2: PAY AND AU.OWANCES OF ENUSTED 

PERSONNEL 

BASIC PAY 

Manne Corps unfunded requlrem8nl- Special Purpose 

Marine Air Ground Ta&M Force- CENT COM and 

SOUTHCOM 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT 

UnobHgated/Unexpel'lded balsru:u 

1,489,996 

4,32!,078 

Committee 

Recommended 

1,490,623 

'" 

4,831,139 

6,001 

-140,380 

-140,360 

ChinliJII from 

... .-

8,061 

-140,$10 
26 

MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ........................ $28,519,993,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ........................ ................. 27,815,926,000 

Committee recommendation ... ....................... 27,564,362,000 

Change from budget request ................. ................... -251,564,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $27,564,362,000 

for Military Personnel, Air Force. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
27 

(DOLLARS IN T~USANOS) 

17000 I'IJLITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

17050 ACTIVITY 1 PAY ANO ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

17100 BASIC PAY. 

1T150 RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL. 

17200 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSHIG. 

17250 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR 5UBSISTENCE. 

17300 lHCENTIYE PA.V$ 

17350 SPECIAL PAYS 

17400 ALLOWANCES 

17450 SEPARATION P.-I.Y 

17500 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 

17550 TOToi.L, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 

17600 ACTIVITY 2 PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

17550 BASIC PAY. 

17700 RETJREO PAY ACCRUAL 

17750 BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 

1?800 INCENTJVE PAYS. 

17850 SPECIAL PAYS. 

17900 ALLOWANCES 

17950 SEPARATJOH P.IIY. 

18000 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 

18050 TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 2. 

18100 ACTlVITV 3 PIIY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS 

18150 ACMEMY CADETS. 

18200 ACTTVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL 

18250 BASIC AlLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE 

1 BJOO SUBSISTENCE ·IN· K INC. 

18350 FAHl L Y SUBSISTEIICE SUPPLEMENTAL AlLOWANCE. 

18400 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTI\IlTV 4 

BUOGET COMMlTTEE CHANGE FROH 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REOUE5T 

4,668 '" 4,809,266 ·59,000 

1. 450 '" 1,4~0,107 

.387 295 1.~67,29-5 

190,311 190,311 

212.316 212,376 

296. 799 296' 799 

125 .!24 125,724 

283' 092 283' 092 

355.558 355' 556 

8.969.526 e.910.52a ·59.000 

e.4oe.o84 B,JB8,5&-4 -19,500 

2,619,233 2.619,233 

3,386.412 386,412 

42.395 42, "395 

268' 538 "" 538 

564' 364 '" '380 

674,187 874' "' 643,063 '" '" ···-········ 16,804,276 " '"' '792 ·22.494 

70.159 '"' "' 

963' 785 '" '" 137,346 "' "' 

1 '101 ,1H 1 '101 ,\U 
28 

(OIJLLARS IN TH0U$AN0S) 

18450 ...C::TtVJTV 5; PER~ANEHT C~A!ICE 01' STATJON 

16500 ACCESSION TRAVEL.. 

1B550 TRAIIONC TRAVEL 

1B600 OPERATIONAL TRAVEL 

18650 ROlATJONAL TRAVEL 

19700 SEPARATION TRAVEL. 

10750 TRAVEL Or' ORGANJlED UNITS 

18800 NON· TEI\PORARY STORAGE. 

18850 TEIIPORARY LOOGING EXPENSE 

18950 TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 5. 

19000 ACTIVITY 6 OTHER 1\ILITARV PERSONNEL COSTS 

19050 APPREHENSION OF IIILTTARV DESERTERS. 

19100 INTEREST ON UN!FOR!1EO SERVICES SAVINGS 

19150 DEATH GRATI.IJT1ES 

19200 UNEIIPLOYIIENT BENEFITS. 

19300 EDUCATION 8ENEFITS., 

19350 ADOPTION EXPENSES. 

19400 TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY. 

19450 PARTIAL OISLDCATJOM ALLOWANCE. 

19550 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAHIJNG CORPS (ROTC). 

19600 JUNIOR ROTC. 

19650 TOTAL. SUDGET ACTIVITY 6 

19700 LESS REJI\8URSABLES 

19750 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTI\ENT 

19800 TD1AL. ACTtVE ~DRCES, AIR FORCE .. 

21000 T01AL. IHLITARY PERSOWifEL, lt!R FORCE. 

BUDGET COI\1\ITTEE CHANGE FROII 

REQUEST RECOI\1\ENDEO REilUES1 

97' 932 " "' 

" "' " "' 

"' "' "' "' ... '" 46~. 297 

"' '593 181 .~aJ 

6, 556 6.556 

22' 369 22,369 

30.261 30.261 

1.192,930 1' 192,930 

'" '" 3.073 3,073 

16,500 16,500 

48.842 48.842 

'" "' 

"' "' 2.013 2,018 

1 .883 1 ,883 

27,669 27 '66g 

1~. 796 " "' 116.823 '" '" ·438,704 • 438' 704 

-170,080 ·170. 080 

27.815.926 27.56'.362 ·251.564 

27.815,926 27,584,382 ·251 ,564 
•. , 

29 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[ln tnou .. na. of dollar.] 

BA-1; PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS 

B.A.Stc PAV 

Lower th1111 budglllled average &trength levels 

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED 

PEF'tSONN!l 

BASIC PAY 

lowef than budgeie<l average strength levels 

ALLOWANCES 

S&$ic mjtary tnlining llflelbe booit- tranafer to OM.AF 

SAG 31 B not properly accounted 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTlo'IENTS 

Unobligatitd./Unllxptlnded balances 

AWACS force &tnJeture program incraaae 

Budget 

Requewt 

4,668,216 

8,406,014 

564.364 

4,509,266 

·59.000 

8,388,584 

-19,500 

1561,380 

-2.984 

-170,080 

-194,980 

24,900 

Change from 

Reqii1Hit 

-49,000 

-18,500 

-2.984 

-170,080 
30 

INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE FORCE 

The Air Force has three missile wings, located at installations in 

Montana, Wyoming, and North Dakota, that are responsible for the 

nation's 450 nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). 

The nuclear mission remains critical to national security. Recently, 

during the process of investigating alleged drug use by airmen, evidence of widespread cheating by ICBM crewmembers on test material at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana was uncovered. A com· 

mand-directed investigation CCDI) discovered problems in the organizational culture and leadership that helped create an environment where crewmembers could compromise or fail to report the 

compromise of test material. The CDI team proposed recommendations in four areas that should be implemented across the enterprise: reforming organizational culture, empowering crew commanders, improving the quality and purpose of training, and reforming testing and evaluation. 

The Committee is extremely concerned with the cheating incidents, the rumors that toleration and acceptance of cheating is part 

of the missileer culture, and concerns that the ICBM mission is 

seen as a dead-end job within the Air Force. The Committee commends the Secretary of the Air Force and the Chief of Staff of the 

Air Force for their immediate response and recognition of the seriousness of this issue. The Committee is also concerned with reports 

of sub-par working conditions for missile crews, including aging 

and run-down facilities, a lack of opportunity for promotion within 

their Air Force Specialty Code, and a Jack of support by senior Air 

Force leadership. 

The Committee was disappointed to see that the operation and 

maintenance portion of the Nuclear Force Improvement Program, 

submitted as part of the Air Force unfunded priority list, failed to 

focus its priorities on items directly imJ?acting the ICBM crews. 

The Committee provides an additional $21,600,000 in Operation 

and Maintenance, Air Force for the Nuclear Force Improvement 

Program and directs the funding to be used for efforts that directly 

improve the quality of life and morale of the ICBM crews. This 

funding is a congressional special interest item. Further, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to submit a detailed 

spending plan to the congressional defense committees not Jess 

than 30 days prior to the obligation of these funds. The Committee 

continues to be supportive of efforts to directly improve the quality 

of life and morale of the ICBM crews and looks forward to working 

with the Secretary of the Air Force and the Chief of Staff of the 

Air Force to review additional proposals as they are recommended. 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation................................ $4,377,563,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ......................... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,................. 4,459,130,000 

Committee recommendation ..................................... ,.......... 4,304,159,000 

Change from budget request .. ,.,,,,,,,,,.............. -154,971,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,304,159,000 

for Reserve Personnel, Army. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
31 

(00Ll ... RS IN TI!OUSA.NDS) 

BUDGET COI1111TTEE CHANGE FROI'I 

REQIJI::ST RECOI'II'IENOfO REQUEST 

...................... 

23000 RESERVE PERSONNEL, AI.IMY 

23050 ACTIVIT\" 1: RESERVE COI'IPONENT TR/t!NTNG AND SUPPORT 

23100 P/1.'1 GRQUP A ~AIMING (15 O ... YS & DRILLS 24148) ,636, 798 1,571,693 -65, 100 

23150 PI\Y CROUP 8 TRAHI!NG (SACKF!Ll FOR ACTIVE O~TY) 49.481) <44.~90 -5,000 

23200 PAY GROUP F TRAINJ.~G (RECRUITS). 279 '040 236.048 -43,000 

23250 PAY GROUP P TRAJN!ilG (PIPELHIE RECRUITS) , , ,926 11 ,926 

23300 I'IOBJLIZATIDN TRAINING 5 '909 5,909 

23350 SCHOOL TRAINING. 161 '751 161 '751 

23400 SPECIAL TRAINING 176,210 "' "' 23450 AOI!lN!STRATION ii.NO SUPPORT. 2,006,97~ 006 "' 23500 EDUCATION BENEFtTS. 10,202 " '" 23550 HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSI'ilP 63' 622 " '" 23600 OTHER PROGRAI'IS 57.199 " "' 23650 TOTAL, BUPGET ACTIVTH 1 ' 459,130 346' 030 ·113, 100 

23800 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTIIENT . ., '" ·41.871 

24000 TOTAL RESERVE PERSONNEL. ARI'IY 4 .459. "' 4.304,1~9 ·154.971 

~===:;;;~~"'" """""~""'"=""" "U""""n•=-
M-1 

32 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT L.EV£l ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thou.anct. of dol..,_] 

Budgltt Committee 

R!!;9UH( Recommel'lded 

BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

PAY GROUP A TRAINING j15 DAYS tnd DRILLS 241.48) 1,636,798 1,571,698 

lnaetlve Dut"t Training· Pl'oieclatl undere:wcu1ion -39.000 

Individual Clothing and Uniforms- eXCNl to requil'ei'I'IM1 -15,300 

Trav11l, Annual Tltlinlng- excen to requirement -10,800 

PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE 

PUTY) 4i,490 44,4SO 

. Annual Trairoing. eJ«::e.Se to requirement -5.000 

PAY GROUP F TRAINING {RECRUITS) 279,04a 236,048 

Proje~ underexecution -4J.OOO 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT """1,671 

Unob~~ne.-pended balances -41,871 

Chang• fi'OOi 

R!9LIMI 

-85.100 

-!i,OGO 

-43,000 

... 1,871 
33 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation . .................... ................... $1,843,966,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .... .......................... 1,863,034,000 

Committee recommendation ...... 1,836,024,000 

Change from budget request . ............................ -27,010,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,836,024,000 

for Reserve Personnel, Navy. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
34 

(DOLLAR$ IN THOUSAifOS) 

BUDGET COHNITTEE CHANGE FROI1 

REQUEST RECOM11ENDEO REQUEST 

26000 RESERVE PERSONNEL, N/\VV 

26050 ACTIVITY 1 RESERVE COMP()NE~T TRAINING AND SUPPORT 

26HIO PAY GROUP .It TR.O.lNlNG (!5 OAVS & DRILLS 241481 595' 488 "' ... 26150 PAY GROUP 1'1 TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACT!V£ OUTYl 7. 286 "' 26200 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS). 57' 875 57,975 

26250 H081LIZATION TRAIN II-/G. 6,670 a ,670 

26300 SCHOOL TRAINING. 51 ,089 51 ,069 

26350 SPECIAL TRAUIING. 106,571 106,571 

26400 J\Of11NIST!V.TtON AND SUPPORT. . .. "' 987.427 . t .000 

264~0 EDUCATION BENEFTT$. '" "' 26500 HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP. 57,516 57,519 

265~0 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 1.863,034 1,862,034 ·1 ,000 

26600 UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT. -26.010 ·26,010 

27000 TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL. NAVY. 1,863.034 1 ,836,0H 
•. , 

35 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

(In thousands of !WI Ia~) 

B\.ldg•t Committee 

Regunt Recomm•nded 

BA·1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT t8U27 987,427 

Full TIIIHI Support Permanent Change or Stlltion • excesa 

to requllame111 -1,000 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT ·2i1,010 

Unobligstl!ld/Un&xpeoded balaJIQ!II ·26,010 

Chsngefrom 

R!,gUMt 

-1,000 

·21.010 
36 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .............................................. $655,109,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .... 670,754,000 

Committee recommendation ......................................... 659,224,000 

Change from budget request .......... .............. . ~ 11,530,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $659,224,000 for 

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
37 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

28000 RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS 

28050 ACTIVITY t RESERVE CO!If'OioiENT TRAINING AND SUPf'ORT 

21'1100 PAY GROUP A TRAI~ING (15 OAYS & DRILLS H!48) 

28150 PAY GROUP B TAAJH!NG (S.O.CKFILL FOR ACT OUTYI 

28200 PAY CROUP F TRAI~ING (RECRUITS). 

20300 MOSlLJZATION TRAINING. 

28350 SCKOOL TRAINUIC. 

26400 SPECIAL TRAINING. 

28450 ADHJN!STRATIOW AND SUPPORT. 

28500 PLATOON LEADER CLASS 

28550 EOUC,O,~lO~ I'IEWEFITS. 

28600 TOT.O.L, SUttOET ACTIVITY t . 

2!700 UNDISTRIBUTED AOJUSTI1ENT. 

28000 TOT.o.L, RESERVE PERSONNEL. HAII:INE CORPS. 

BUDGET COI'II'IlTTEE CHANGE FR~ 

~EaUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

237,581 "' "' 

" "' " "' 

"' '" 115,450 

2,579 2,579 

"' '" 24 '1!15 

15.726 15,728 

234. 244 234,244 

6,124 6. 124 

'" ,., 

670' 754 "" "' -750 

_,. ,., -10.780 

670' 754 6S9 224 -11, ~JO 
•. , 

38 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL. ADJUSTMENTS 

lin thous.and. of doll1r1) 

Budget Committee 

~l.lllllt Reoommended 

BA-1: RESERVe COMPONENT TRI\INING AND 

SUPPORT 

PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 116,200 115,450 

Pay Group F. Tra\ffll- Marine Corp1 Rnerve identified 

ei(C&t& to r&qulr&meo1 _,., 

UNDISTRIBUTI!:D ADJUSTMENT -10,780 

Unobligoted/UmJXPllllded balancei -10,780 

Cheng• trom 

R!:!ueet 

., .. 

-10,780 
39 

RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation . ............................... $1,723,159,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .......................... 1,675,518,000 

Committee recommendation .. .................. ............... 1,652,148,000 

Change from budget request ............... ............................................. -23,370,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,652,148,000 

for Reserve Personnel, Air Force. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
40 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

3DOOO ASSERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

30050 ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COfiPCitiEIH TRAINING AMO SUPPORT 

30100 PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24148). 

30150 PAY GROUP 8 TRAI~ING (Bo\CKFILL FOR ACTIVE 0\Jn'). 

30200 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRVITS) 

30250 PAY GROUP P TRAINl~G (PIPELINE RECRUITS), 

30300 ~OBILllATION TRAINING 

30350 SCHOOL TRAINING 

30400 SPECIAL TRAINING. 

30450 AOH!NlSTRATION AND SUPPORT, .. 

30500 EDUCATTON BENEFITS 

30~~0 HEALTH PROF'ESSIOH SCHOLARSHIP. , 

30600 OTHER PROGRMS ( ADIIIN & SUPPORT) . 

30650 TOTAL, BUDGET ACTJVIn' 1. 

307 SO UNDISTRIBUTED AOJUSTHENT, 

31000 TOTAL, IIESEI!IIE PERSONNEL, Alii FORCE 

BUDGET COIIHtTTH CHANGE FROH 

REQUEST RECOHHENOED REQUEST 

657,163 657' 163 

113,876 106,876 ·7 ,00() 

71 ,429 " .-zs 

1 ,681 , ,681 

"' "' 12'5.804 125.804 

229,201 229.201 

398.346 393 '446 ·4, 900 

13,785 13, 78S 

50' 794 58. 79~ 

5,038 5, 038 

·---·-·-·-· 1,075,519 ,663,6\8 -II ,900 

-11 ,470 -11 ,470 

···--·-----· 1,675,518 t,652,14S ·23.370 

"""""""""""" """""""""""" =======:==:= 
.. , 

41 

EXP~NATIQN Of PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In tnounnds of dolla,.) 

BA-1: RESEfW!; COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL. FOR ACTIVE 

DUTY) 

Project!Jd underexeculian 

~MINISTRAnON AND SUPPORT 

Reserve l~ve Program - eJtCttn kl requirement 

AGR Pay end Allowance- projec1ed vnderexeeullon 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT 

UI"IObligatedNn~~XpenMd balance5 

Budgot 

......... 

11!!1.8115 

39B,m 

Comm1U.Ua 

R&&ommBnded 

106,876 

-7.000 

393,.44& 

-3,400 

-1.500 

·11,470 

-11,470 

-7,otl0 

...,, 

·11,470 
42 

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ............ ..................... $7,776,498,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ......... ................ 7,682,892,000 

Committee recommendation ............... ....................... 7,644,632,000 

Change from budget request . . ................................ - 38,260,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $7,644,632,000 

for National Guard Personnel, Army. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
43 

I DOLLARS IN TtlOUSJ\NOS) 

BI,IOO£T COIIII!TTH CHANGE FROII 

REQUEST RJ:COI'IMENQ:I:O REO\IEST 

32000 ~J\T!ONAL GUARD PERSI)NNEL, AAMY 

32050 /ICHVITY 1: RESERVE COHPQNENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 

32100 f'AY GRQUP A TAAINl~G (16 OAYS 3 DRILLS 24H8J. 2,616 ,Oi!7 2,570.887 -45,200 

32150 PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) ~41 ,606 ~21.908 -19,700 

32200 PAY GROUP P TRIITNING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) 47,984 47.984 

32Z50 SCHOOL TRAINING. 347' "' 3H, 137 

32300 SPECIAL TRAINING m '" 433.207 

32350 ADHIIIISTRATIO~ AND SUPPORT 3.766 '1!24 766' 824 

32400 EDUCATION 8E~EF!TS. 30,267 30,267 

32450 TOTAL. BUDGET ,I,CTIVITY 1. 7,092,692 7,617,992 -64,900 

32600 UNDISTRIBUTED AOJUSTI!ENT. 26,640 +26' 640 

33000 TOTAL, NATHINAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARI'IY. 7,662.892 7.644.632 -38,260 
.... 

44 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENT$ 

[In thou .. rwn of dotla,.] 

Budgllt Com.,lttH 

R!;gllnl Recommended 

BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

PAY GROUP A TRAINING j1$ DAYS and DRILLS 24148) 2,6111,067 2,510,887 

Inactive Duty Training -project&<! underexecutlon -40,000 

Sub8istente. Annual Training and Inactive Duty Tralllingproject«:~ ul'ldere~ion -5,200 

PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 441,606 421.~6 

Individual Clothing aod Uniform Allowance e>eoess to 

reQuirement -19,700 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS 26,640 

UnobligatadfU~I!d ~lance~ ·18,360 

Fully fund lw(l Combat Training Canter rotation&· Army 

r91.1ueated transfer from OMA SAG 121 45,000 

Ch1ngefi'Om 

R119~t 

-46,200 

-19,71)0 

"'·"' 
45 

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ...................... $3,114,421,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ....................................................... 3,156,457,000 

Committee recommendation ............................... 3,110,587,000 

Change from budget request .. .......................................... -45,870,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,110,587,000 

for National Guard Personnel, Air Force. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
46 

(DOLLARS JN Tl10US .... NDS) 

BUOGfT CO~IHTTEE C"ANGE FRO~ 

REIJUI<ST Rf:COfolf'\ENDEO REQUEST 

34000 ~T[QNAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR F'ORCE 

34050 ACTIVIT'! 1 RESERIIE COMPONE~T TRAINING AND SUPPORT 

34100 PAY GROUP A TRAINHIG [15 OA.YS & DRILLS 241481 913,691 9t:l,691 

34150 PAY GROUP F TRAIMHIG (RECRUITS). 122,678 "' "' -6,500 

34200 P•I.Y GROUP P TRAlNUoiG (PIPELINE RECRUITS),. 5' 384 , .. 34250 SC\100L TAAI~tHG. 243' 888 2~3. 888 

34300 SPECIAL TRAINING. 168.222 188,222 

34350 A0l1JNISTRATION AND SUPPORT. 1 ,684,80[) 1,663,400 ·21. 400 

:)4400 WUCATION BfNEFITS 17.794 17. 79' 

344SO TOT"-l, BUOOET ACTIVITY 1. "' m 3,128,557 -27,900 

34700 UNOlSTRl BUTEO ADJUSTHENT. ·11,970 ·17,870 

35000 TOTAL. NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL. ATR FORCE 3,156,457 3,110,567 -45,870 

::::::===~· .. cc'"u"~~"""" '"'"'"'""'"'"•"'"'"" 
M·' 

47 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In tl'louundl or dol .. ,.] 

Budget Committee 

Reguet.t Recommended 

BA-t: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND 

SUPPORT 

PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) 121,678 116,178 

Projeded undereecution ·6.500 

AOMINlSTRATION AND SUPPORT 1,1184,800 1,663,400 

Full Time Pay and Allcrwances • projected underexeculion ·16,400 

Non-Prier 5ervlce Enlistmer~t Bonus- excen 10 reqUirement -5.000 

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT ·17,970 

Unobligated/I.Jnexpendfld balane~~s -17,970 

ChlllliJII fTOOI ....... 

.1,1100 

-21,400 

-17,970 

TITLE II 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

The fiscal year 2015 Department of Defense operation and maintenance budget request totals $166,002,818,000. The Committee 

recommendation provides $164,631,638,000 for the operation and 

maintenance accounts. The table below summarizes the Committee 

recommendations: 

(49) 
50 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

SUDGET COMIHTTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMtiEMOEP REQUEST 

··········· 

RECAPITULA llUN 

OPERATION HAlNTENANCE, ARMY. " 2~0. 140 32,671 . gao ·568.168 

OPERATION & t\AINTENANCE, NAVY. " 3\6,657 39,073 "' ·2.43 ,314 

OPE~ T1 ON & 1'\A I NTENANCE, MARINE CORPS, 909.487 984 080 +15' 193 

OPERATION & 1'\A!NTENANCE, AIR FORCE. 35. 331 '193 35 024 '60 ·307 033 

OPERATION & MAHHENMICE, DEFENSE-WIDE " ,198,23~ 30,896 '" ·301 .491 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARHY RESERVE 2. 490.569 2.535,808 . ., 037 

OPERATIOfJ & MAINTENANCE, HAW RESERVE. 007,100 1,011 ,827 •4 '727 

OPERATION & HAHHEMAI-ICE. KARINE CORPS RESEI!VE. 268.592 "' 485 •1 '903 

OPERATION & I'IA!NTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE. 3.015,84~ 2,989,214 ·26,628 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, A~MY NATIONAL GUARD 030.173 6.116,307 •85 534 

OPERATION & HAJHTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUIIRO 392,859 6,393,919 •1 '060 

OVERSEI>.S CONHNGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER ACCOUNT 5, 000 -5 000 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARH~O FORCES 13 "' 13,723 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION ARM'!'. 201 . 580 201.560 

ENVIRONMfiHAL RESTORATION, NAVV. , "' 2?7. 294 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCF. 40B '" 406. 716 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE -WIDE • "' ,., 

ENVIRONI'IENTAL RESTORATION, FORMERLY USED OEF. SITES. 20B 353 233,3!;3 •25,000 

OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER. AND CIVIC AID .. 10Q 000 103,000 +3 '000 

COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT. "' 100 365,108 

000 ACQUTSJTION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FUND. 212 "' 51 ,875 . , 61 ,000 

==~=~""""'""'""' ""'"'""'"""""""" =======:::=:: GRMO TOTAl. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 166,002,818 164,631.638 ·1 ,371 '180 

'~~==:=·~=~" ....... ,. .. ~ ....... ---·-··-~·-~ 
51 

REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

ACCOUNTS 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit the 

Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414) for each of the fiscal year 

2015 appropriation accounts not later than 60 days after the enactment of this Act. The Secretary of Defense is prohibited from executing any reprogramming or transfer of funds for any purpose 

other than originally appropriated until the aforementioned report 

is submitted to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to use the normal prior approval reprogramming procedures to transfer funds in 

the Services' operation and maintenance accounts between budget 

activities in excess of $15,000,000. In addition, the Secretary of Defense should follow prior approval reprogramming procedures for 

transfers in excess of $15,000,000 out of the following budget subactivities: 

Army: 

Maneuver units 

Modular support brigades 

Land forces operations support 

Force readiness operations support 

Land forces depot maintenance 

Base operations support 

Facilities sustainment, restoration, and modernization 

Navy: 

Mission and other flight operations 

Aircraft depot maintenance 

Mission and other ship operations 

Ship depot maintenance 

Facilities sustainment, restoration, and modernization 

Marine Corps: 

Depot maintenance 

Facilities sustainment, restoration, and modernization 

Air Force: 

Primary combat forces 

Combat enhancement forces 

Combat communications 

Facilities sustainment, restoration, and modernization 

Operating forces depot maintenance 

Mobilization depot maintenance 

Training and recruiting depot maintenance 

Administration and service-wide depot maintenance 

Air Force Reserve: 

Depot maintenance 

Air National Guard: 

Depot maintenance 

Finally, the Secretary of Defense should follow prior approval reprogramming procedures for transfers in excess of $15,000,000 into 

the following budget sub-activity: 

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard: 

Other personnel support/recruiting and advertising 

With respect to Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, proposed transfers of funds to or from the levels specified for defense 
52 

agencies in excess of $15,000,000 shall be subject to prior approval 

reprogramming procedures. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET EXECUTION DATA 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to continue to 

provide the congressional defense committees with quarterly budget execution data. Such data should be provided not later than 45 

days after the close of each quarter of the fiscal year, and should 

be provided for each 0-1 budget activity, activity group, and subactivity group for each of the active, defense-wide, reserve, and National Guard components. For each 0-1 budget activity, activity 

group, and sub-activity group, these reports should include the 

budget request and actual obligation amount, the distribution of 

unallocated congressional adjustments to the budget request, all 

adjustments made by the Department in establishing the Base for 

Reprogramming (DD Form 1414) report, all adjustments resulting 

from below threshold reprogrammings, and all adjustments resulting from prior approval reprogramming requests. 

SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS 

Items for which additional funds have been provided or items for 

which funding has been reduced as shown in the project level tables or in paragraphs using the phrase "only for" or "only to" in the 

Committee report are congressional interest items for the purpose 

of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of these 

items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated amount 

specifically addressed in the Committee report. Below threshold 

reprogrammings may not be used to either restore or reduce funding from congressional interest items as identified on the DD Form 

1414. These items remain special interest items whether or not 

they are repeated in a subsequent conference report. 

READINESS 

The Committee shares the concern of the Secretary of Defense 

and the Service Chiefs regarding reduced readiness levels across 

the military. A decade of war coupled with the impacts of sequestration and the current fiscal climate has limited the Services' ability to transition their focus from counter-insurgency operations to 

full spectrum training in preparation for future requirements. The 

Committee supports the Service Chiefs' commitment to improved 

readiness and recognizes that it will take time and stable budgets 

to restore full spectrum readiness. 

The Committee recommendation includes $1,000,000,000 in title 

VIII of the bill to be transferred to the operation and maintenance 

accounts for the active Services, the National Guard, and the reserve components, to be used only for improving military readiness. 

The funding is to be divided proportionately amongst the Services 

and the National Guard and reserve components, and shall be used 

only to improve readiness, including increased training, depot 

maintenance, and base operations support. None of the funding 

provided may be used for recruiting, marketing, or advertising programs. The Committee believes that as the Services continue to reduce personnel levels, they must become more efficient and effec-
53 

tive with the advertising and recruiting dollars provided in the 

base budget and should not use funds intended for readiness on increased advertising or recruiting efforts. Additional funds are also 

provided to the Army, Navy, and Air Force for depot maintenance 

in their respective depot maintenance sub-activity groups. 

The funding provided is a congressional special interest item. 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense and the Service 

Secretaries to submit a detailed spending plan by budget activity 

and sub-activity group to the congressional defense committees not 

less than 30 days prior to the obligation of these funds. 

SERVICE AUDIT AGENCY VALIDATION 

The Committee understands that in fiscal year 2014, the Secretary of Defense revised the guidance for reporting associated with 

section 2466 of title 10, United States Code, in a manner that suggests a renewed interest in enforcing intra-departmental policies on 

depot maintenance workloads and 50-50 reporting. However, this 

guidance, while more detailed in some ways than that issued in the 

r.ast, directs that the validation effort focus on the 50-50 data colection process instead of on the actual data. It also appears to give 

the Services additional flexibility to use reviewers other than those 

associated with their respective audit agencies to validate their respective processes prior to submission of the data to the Secretary 

of Defense. The Committee has two concerns with regard to the 

new guidance. First, the Committee considers a review of the 50-

50 data to be submitted to Congress as critical to ensuring compliance with section 2466. Second, given the results of past reviews, 

the Committee considers Service audit agency involvement in the 

validation of the submissions essential to ensuring the accuracy of 

the 50-50 report. 

The Committee directs each Service Secretary to submit a report 

to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days 

after the enactment of this Act on the respective Service plan to ensure that the Service audit agency is directly involved in the process of annually validating that the data submitted for the report 

to Congress on the Distribution of Department of Defense Depot 

Maintenance Workloads are accurate and complete, beginning with 

the report for fiscal years 2014 through 2016. The report produced 

by each Service Secretary shall provide details regarding the Service audit agency's plan to validate all data submitted for inclusion 

in future 50-50 reports, including a description of the approach 

that will be used to accomplish this data validation and a description of plans to review depot-level maintenance and repair workload estimates associated with contractor logistics support, interim 

contractor support, performance based logistics, and similar contractual arrangements. As a further means of enhancing the annual validation process, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to develop a standard set of data fields to guide the Services 

and defense agencies in their annual collection of data for the 50-

50 report and to establish a requirement that all depot maintenance expenditure data collected be retained at the Service or defense agency's headquarters for at least three years. Moreover, the 

Committee recommends that the Service Secretaries and the directors of the defense agencies work to automate their data collection 
RELEASE OF DETAINEES 

The Committee is deeply concerned with the Administration's handling of 

the recent transfer of five senior level Taliban leaders detained at United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. It is clear that the Department violated 

Section 1035 of the fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act, which 

requires a 30 day prior notification to the transfer of any detainees to a foreign 

country. While the debate of negotiating with terrorists will continue for some 

time, the violation of trust between the Department and Congress to use funds in 

violation of current law cannot be easily overlooked. In fact, the restriction on 

foreign transfers of detainees, which has been in place for five years, was modified 

in good faith on Congress' part just last year. Further, any notion that exigent 

circumstances prevented proper congressional notification rings hollow when the 

Administration clearly has been negotiating this transfer for several years. The 
Committee understands the unique nature of the events that led to this transfer, but 

believes that is exactly the reason why prior notification is so important. The 

decision to negotiate with terrorists for the release of prisoners is a dangerous 

precedent, one that has implications far beyond the Department of Defense, and 

one that Congress should have a voice in deciding. Therefore, to further clarify 

Congressional prerogatives which were ignored, the Committee includes a general 

provision which prohibits the Secretary from spending any funds in violation of 

Section 1035 ofthe fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act. 
54 

processes wherever possible to improve the auditability of their 

data and reduce the likelihood of human errors in the calculations. 

DEPOT-LEVEL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR BUDGET EXHIBITS 

The Committee remains frustrated with the quality of the annual 

budget justification materials related to the Department of Defense 

depot-level maintenance expenditures. The OP-30 budget exhibit 

provides useful details concerning the extent to which the operation 

and maintenance budget request meets the Services' requirements 

for depot-level maintenance and repair of end items. The OP-31 

budget exhibit provides insight regarding estimated orders for 

depot-level repairables (DLRs). The fiscal year 2015 budget request 

also includes the PB-45 budget exhibit, which some Services provide in lieu of the OP-30; this document provides additional useful 

information about methods of accomplishment of depot-level maintenance and repair workloads. What is missing, however, is an 

overarching document that summarizes the request for all depotlevel maintenance and repair workloads, regardless of whether the 

work pertains to end items or DLRs, and regardless of which appropriations account funds the work. 

Therefore, beginning with the fiscal year 2016 request, the Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to include, in addition to the documentation referenced above, an exhibit that provides a comprehensive view of depot-level maintenance and repair workloads for each of the Services in future budget requests. Each Service shall submit with its budget request an 

exhibit that summarizes funded requirements for its active, reserve, and Guard components, where applicable, which shows the 

full range of depot-level maintenance and repair workload, including all end items and DLRs. This budget exhibit shall display 

major maintenance activities and their method of accomplishment 

(including contractor logistics support, interim contractor support, 

other contract, and organic) by appropriations account for the prior 

year, current year, and budget year. The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) should ensure that these exhibits do not include expenditures for work other than depot-level maintenance 

and repair. 

DEPOT MAINTENANCE 

With the recent drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan, repair operations at the depots have increased as the Services rebalance for 

training and preparation for full-spectrum operations. The Committee is aware of the critical role that the depots play in maintaining readiness and recognizes that after a decade of war, capital investments and modernization of the repair facilities is required to 

support the reset of platforms needed for full-spectrum operations. 

Therefore, the Committee provides an additional $90,000,000 specifically for depot maintenance for the Army, Navy, and Air Force. 

FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 

The Committee has expressed concern for the last three fiscal 

years that base facility sustainment requirements are underfunded. 

The Committee believes that deferring this maintenance has a 
55 

long-term detrimental impact on both military readiness and the 

quality of life and work environment of servicemembers. The Committee provides an additional $720,000,000 to the facilities 

sustainment, restoration, and modernization programs to address 

the maintenance backlog for the active Services, the National 

Guard, and the reserve components. 

SUICIDE PREVENTION TRAINING AND OUTREACH 

Suicide remains an issue of concern in the Services, especially 

within the Guard and reserve components. Whereas 

servicemembers serving on active duty return from deployments to 

military bases which provide structured support networks, returning Guardsmen and reservists are frequently geographically isolated from their units and may not have the regular interactions 

with their peers and chain of command that their active duty counterparts experience. 

The Committee is aware of programs for the reserve components, 

such as the National Guard Psychological Health Program, to improve access to mental health providers, and the Committee recommendation fully funds the budget request for this program. The 

Committee recommendation provides additional funding for suicide 

prevention in the Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide account. In addition, the Committee recognizes the important role 

that programs such as Yellow Ribbon play in helping Guardsmen 

and reservists transition to civilian life upon returning from deployment. 

The Committee acknowledges the steps that the Services have 

taken to implement suicide prevention training and outreach efforts and to lower the rate of suicide among servicemembers but 

believes that more must be done to identify at-risk servicemembers 

and to improve prevention and outreach efforts. The Committee 

urges the Service Secretaries to continue to make suicide prevention a key priority and to regularly update the Committee on actions being taken. 

WORKING CONDITIONS IN BANGLADESH 

The Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 directed 

the Secretary of Defense to provide quarterly reports to the congressional defense committees that specify if any garments purchased by the military exchange system are manufactured in Bangladesh from suppliers that are not signatories or in compliance 

with the Accord for Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. The 

Committee is aware that there is a second organization of companies, the Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety, that is also concerned with ensuring compliance. The Committee supports the continued reporting on this issue and directs the Secretary of Defense 

to include in the quarterly submissions if any of the garments purchased by the military exchange system are manufactured in Bangladesh from suppliers that are not signatories or in compliance 

with either the Accord or the Alliance. 
56 

OVERESTIMATION AND REPORTING OF CIVILIAN WORKFORCE 

The fiscal year 2014 budget request substantially overestimated 

the number of civilians that would be employed by the Department 

of Defense during fiscal year 2014. The Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 used data provided by the Services 

and defense agencies to identify the actual civilian full time equivalents (FTE) that were recorded beginning in fiscal year 2014 and 

reduced funding in the operation and maintenance accounts based 

on this overestimation of civilian FTE levels. While the Committee 

supports a strong civilian workforce, the Department of the Army 

and the Department of the Air Force again substantially overestimated the number of civilians that would be employed during fiscal 

year 2015. For the Army and Air Force, including the reserve components but not the National Guard, the current fiscal year 2014 

estimate for civilian FTEs is well below what was provided for in 

the Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 and what 

is planned in the fiscal year 2015 budget request. As such, the 

Committee recommends reductions in fiscal year 2015 due to over~ 

estimation of civilian FTEs in these accounts. 

The Committee has not received the Department of the Navy's 

projected fiscal year 2015 average civilian FTE strength. Additionally, the Navy has not provided that data to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to enable it to complete its annual analysis of the Department of Defense civilian personnel budget request. Failure to provide information in a timely manner makes it 

difficult for the Committee and the GAO to conduct proper oversight. Therefore, the Committee again reduces the Navy, but not 

the Marine Corps, fiscal year 2015 request for civilian personnel 

commensurate with the Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal 

year 2014. 

To ensure that timely and accurate information is provided in future fiscal years, beginning in fiscal year 2016 the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to include the projected average civilian FTE strength as well as the civilian end strength in its quarterly end strength report. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET DOCUMENTATION 

While the Department of Defense and the Departments of the 

Army and the Air Force all provide average annual civilian salary 

by sub-activity group (SAG) in the personnel summary exhibit in 

the OP-5, the Department of the Navy does not provide this information. The Committee is aware that the Department of Defense 

Financial Management Regulation (FMR) does not require this 

data as part of the budget justification materials. The Committee 

recommends that the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) 

modify the FMR to require that this information be provided at the 

SAG level of detail as part of all operation and maintenance account budget justification submissions. Further, until the FMR is 

amended to require this information be included in the annual 

budget justification submissions, the Committee directs the Under 

Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and the Service Secretaries to 

provide the average annual civilian salary in the personnel sum-
57 

mary exhibit for each sub-activity group for each Service and agency. 

The Committee is disappointed that in many cases throughout 

the fiscal year 2015 budget justification materials, the Department 

of the Navy and the Department of Defense use the term "partially 

offset" rather than breaking out program changes by program increase and program decrease for every line item in the OP-5. This 

makes it difficult for the Committee to have full visibility over the 

changes occurring within programs. Therefore, beginning in fiscal 

year 2016, the Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense 

(Comptroller) and the Service Secretaries to fully display all increases and decreases at the SAG level in the OP-5 exhibits. 

Finally, in many of the workload exhibits in the operation and 

maintenance accounts, there is no accompanying explanation of the 

units of measurement. The Committee directs the Under Secretary 

of Defense (Comptroller) and the Service Secretaries to properly 

annotate the exhibits to specify the units of measurement presented in the display. 

OPERATIONAL RESERVE 

The Committee has previously expressed concern regarding the 

Army's support for maintaining an operational reserve. After reviewing the fiscal year 2015 budget request, the Committee remains concerned that the Army Reserve and the Army National 

Guard readiness accounts are significantly underfunded. The Committee believes that this will have an immediate and lasting impact 

on the Army National Guard and the Army Reserve's readiness 

that will be difficult to restore in future fiscal years. 

Significant taxpayer investment has been made to enable the 

Guard and reserve to become an integral part of the operational 

force. The Committee supports the enduring vision of an operational reserve and encourages all Services to continue resourcing 

and utilizing the Guard and reserve components as key members 

of the operational force. 

In addition to the $1,000,000,000 provided for increased military 

readiness described elsewhere in the Committee report, of which 

the Army Reserve and the Army National Guard will receive a proportional share, $135,000,000 is provided directly to the Army Reserve and the Army National Guard to be used specifically to further improve readiness of the operational reserve. The recommendation also includes $68,000,000 for the Army National 

Guard to fully fund two Combat Training Center rotations in fiscal 

year 2015 as scheduled. 

MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 

The Committee appreciates the attention that the Department 

has given to the Committee's concern that funding for military information support operations (MISO) activities only be used to fulfill core military activities rather than duplicate programs and activities more appropriately conducted by other departments and 

agencies. The Committee believes that significant progress has 

been made and appreciates the Department's efforts in this regard. 

The Committee notes that there are some specific issues that warrant further review which are detailed in the classified annex ac-
58 

companying the Committee report. The Committee looks forward to 

continuing to work with the Department to address these matters. 

The Committee recommendation reduces the base budget request 

for MISO funding by $15,000,000. The allocation of funds by combatant command and funding levels for certain programs is specifically delineated in the classified annex. The delineation of this 

funding is a congressional special interest item and any deviations 

from the allocations are subject to sections 8005, 8006, and 9002 

of this Act. 

The Secretary of Defense is also directed to submit a report to 

the House and Senate Appropriations Committees not later than 

30 days after the enactment of this Act that details the proposed 

execution of the funding provided for MISO programs. The report 

shall include the program name, activity, a description of service, 

target audience, goals and objectives, attribution, measures of effectiveness, prior year obligations and expenditures, and the estimated budget for the year of execution. This report, and the delineation of each program, project, and activity, shall serve as the 

basis for reprogramming in accordance with section 8006 of this 

Act. 

NUCLEAR A."'D NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE 

The Committee understands that differences between Department of Defense and civilian guidelines regarding nuclear or radiological event disaster response created challenges during Operation 

Tomadachi, which provided humanitarian assistance following the 

earthquake and the tsunami, and the subsequent release of radioactive material from the Fukushima nuclear reactor in Japan. The 

Committee understands that more uniform methodologies are being 

considered to eliminate confusion among responders and improve 

the decisionmaking process during such operations, and it encourages the Secretary of Defense to consider such proposals when reviewing guidelines for conducting nuclear, radiological, and natural 

disaster response and humanitarian assistance operations. 

PERFORMANCE MEASURES 

The Committee supports efforts to include performance measures 

in the budget justification documents. These performance measures 

should be result oriented and demonstrate how prior year investments show progress toward achieving performance goals. The 

Committee urges the Secretary of Defense to work with the Comptroller General of the United States to develop result oriented performance measures that will assist the Department in the implementation of its strategic guidance. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .. $30,768,069,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .. .................... ............... 33,240,148,000 

Committee recommendation . ...................... 32,671,980,000 

Change from budget request -568,168,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $32,671,980,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Army. The total amount rec-
59 

ommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
60 

(DOLLARS IN THCIUSANOS) 

OPERATION 1\NO MI\JNTENIINCE, ARMY 

BUDGET oi.CTIV!TY 1· OPERAT!NG FORCES 

lAND FORCES 

10 MIINEUVER UNITS 

20 1100l.ILAR SUPP{JRT BRIGADES .. 

30 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES. 

40 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 

50 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 

SO AVIATION ASSETS 

LAND FORCE$ READINESS 

70 FORCE REAOlNE$$ OPERATIONS SUP~ORT 

80 LAND FORCES S\'STEIIS READINESS. 

90 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE. 

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .• 

110 FACILITIES SUSTI>.IN11ENT, RESTORATHIN. & IIOOERNIZATION. 

120 ltANAGEHENT AND OPERATIOHAL HEADQUARTERS 

1~0 COMBATANT COMM!I.NDER"S CCRE OPERATT()I.IS .• 

170 COI'!BAT.O.NT C01111ANOEAS ANCILLARY Hl5S!ONS. 

TOTAL. BUaGET ACTIVITY 1 

BUOGH ACTIVITY 2: !'IOBILlZATJON 

ttOB!LlT'f OPERATIONS 

180 STRATEGIC HOBIL!TY 

190 oi.RMY PREPOSITIO'IEO STOCKS. 

200 lNDUSTR!IIL PREPAREDNESS 

TOT.O.L. B~DGET ACTIVITY 2. 

9UOGET CO"HlTTEE CHANGE FROit 

REQUEST RECOIIIIENOEO RtQUEST 

'"' '" 895,281 

" .990 61.990 

450.987 446. 094 ·2 903 

'" m s•s.773 

1 ,057 "' 1.057,453 

1 ,409 "' .330.347 -79.000 

592.334 3,494,765 ·97 .569 

411 ,388 411 .388 

1.001.232 1,031.232 

7.428.972 7,201.507 

2.066.434 2.245,577 +179,143 

411 .863 411.863 

179,399 179. 399 

432.281 432,281 

20.018,734 19.148.940 ·271.794 

316 776 316,776 

1&7 609 187.609 

6,463 6.463 

510,848 
61 

jOOLLARS IN HIOUSANOS) 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3; TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

ACCESSION TRAINING 

210 OFF~CER ACOYISJT!ON. 

:220 RECRUIT TRAINING 

230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING 

240 SENIOR RESERVE QF"FICH~S TRAIIIINO CORPS 

BASIC SKILL AND AOVANCED TRAINHIG 

250 SPECIAUZEO SKILL TRAINING. 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING 

270 PROFESSION!\'. DEVElOPMENT EDUCATION. 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT 

RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION 

290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 

300 EXA~ININU 

310 OFF· DUTY ANO VOLUNTARY EOUCA T lOll 

J20 Cl\/Tl JAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 

330 JUNIO~ RESERVE OFFICERS TRAJNIIIG CORPS 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACT!VlTY 3 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN I SERVICE\o/IOE ACTIV!YlES 

J41J SECURITY f'ROGRAKS. 

LGGISTICS OPERATIONS 

350 SERV!CEW!DE TRANSPORTATION. 

300 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES. 

370 LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES. 

3<10 A~t\UNITJON MANACiEt\ENT. 

BUDGET CO~t\ITTH CHANGE FFIOI'I 

REilVEST RECO~MENDED REQUEST 

12~' '" '" '" 

" "' " "' ·4,000 

" "' 35,735 -8,000 

"' '" 456' 563 

886' ~29 858.529 ·28.000 

890,070 690,070 

193,291 188,958 -4' 333 

552,359 552' 359 

466,927 468.927 

"' "' 188' 489 ·8.099 

205 "' 205. 782 

150' 571 150.571 

169,784 189,784 

-----·---·-- 4,3a6,93J 4,336,501 ~.432 

1.030,411 1,029,474 -931 

541 .en 541,877 

72:!.,2111 122,291 

602,034 602.034 

422,277 422,2H 
SERVICE\oi!DE SUPPORT 

390 AOHitllSTRAT!ON. 

~00 SERV!CEW!OE COMHUN!CATIONS 

"' MIINPOWER MANAGEMENT. 

"' OTHER PERSQI.INEL SUPPORT. 

"' OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT. 

"' ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVIT! ES. 

•50 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 

"' BASE OPERATICINS SUPPORT. 

SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS 

'" SUPPORT CIF NATO OPERATIONS. 

'" MISC. SUPPORT OF OTttER NATIONS. 

TQT,O.L, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 

62 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSAMCS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE I'RDH 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

'"' '" 403.031 -2' 405 

1 ,624 '" 1,624,742 

'" "' 289,171 

390.924 300.924 

'1 18.540 1 '123.440 +4,1100 

Ht ,234 241,234 

143,509 2<113,509 

200,615 200,615 

"' '" "' '" 

" "' " "' 8,323.633 8.32~ 191 ~~.sse 

OVERESTIIIATE 01' C !Vll IAN f'TE TARGETS -247, 500 -247. !!rOO 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. ~RtW .• 33,240,148 32.,671,980 
63 

EXI'I..ANAnON OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thou1anda of dolla"'] 

Budget Commlt11111 Change frOm 0-1 Requaat RKommeN:Iad 

11' MANeUVER UNITS 969,281 895,281 

·-

-74,000 

Unjusmied proQram !lmwlh ·74,000 

113 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE •50,987 448,084 ·2.903 

Remove one-time fiscal year 2014 ~oots for UnmaMed 

Aircratt Svstems · Raven -2,903 

"' AVIATION ASSETS 1,409,347 1,330,347 -79,000 

Untusutlad pro11ram 11•owth -79,000 

121 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 3,&92,334 3,494,7811 -97,569 

Forward based mode radar l)(ogram fully funded in 

Mis~le Defense Ao11ncv Dudaet -29,569 

Fully lund two Combat Training Center rota loons- Army 

l'l!Qo.l!l&ted transfer to OM.ARNG and MP,AANG -58,000 

123 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,001,232 1,031,232 30,000 

Program increese 30,000 

"' BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 7,428,972 7.201,507 -227,-4455 Ju!IIINcatton does 001 match summary ol price and 

program changes for ut1ll1ies 

Army Cemeteries- lranster to OM.AR not property 

-227.200 

accounled -265 

132 FACtUTII!.S SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND 

MOOERNIZATlON 2,086,434 2.24M17 179,1~ 

Arlington National Cern&t$ry funded in MiiiBIY 

Construe~ on and Ve-terane All airs ADoroonationa !Jill -25,000 

Program Increase 204,H3 

312 RECRUIT TRAINING 51,968 47,888 -4,000 

Excess to requlremenl -4,000 

313 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING 43,735 35,73~ -8.000 

Excess to reQuirement -8,000 

321 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 8&8,529 858,528 -28,000 

Excess to reoulrement -38,000 

LanQuaQt~ capa.bilil1118 prOflram 1ncreaae 10,000 

323 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EOUCAnON 193,291 188,9!!8 -4,333 

UlljUSI111eo:l prO!Jram QI'OWih -4,333 

332 EXAMINING 194,588 188,489 -6,089 

US MEPGOM test admin<s1ralors - unjusltlied program 

orowlh -6.099 

411 SECURITY PROGRAMS 1,030.411 1,029,474 -037 

Cybur rual1gnmaul ol funds -transfer to SAG 121 not 

oroP!I~~ act:ounted -937 

431 ADMINISTRATION 405,442 403,037 -2,405 

Ciyilien Workforce Transfonnallon - unjusl~led program 

QIOwlh -2,405 

'" OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT 1,118,540 1,123,440 4,900 

Armv ~uppon !c Cap!lol 4th 4,900 

OYERII!STIMATION OF CtVIliAN FTE TAFIGETS -247,500 -247,5011 
64 

CEMETERIAL EXPENSES 

The Committee notes that for the third year in a row, the fiscal 

year 2015 budget request includes $25,000,000 in the Operation 

and Maintenance, Army account to assist with the maintenance 

backlog at Arlington National Cemetery instead of requesting all 

funds within the Cemeterial Expenses, Army account. As stated in 

the reports accompanying the House versions of the Department of 

Defense Appropriations Acts for fiscal years 2013 and 2014, the 

Committee does not support the proposal to fund Arlington National Cemetery through separate accounts contained in two different appropriations bills. Split funding undermines the federal 

budgeting principles requiring expenditures to be charged against 

the same account each year, once an account has been identified 

for such purpose. The Committee rejects the proposal to fund 

cemeterial expenses in the Operation and Maintenance, Army account and instead provides funding to address tbe maintenance 

backlog at Arlington National Cemetery in the Cemeterial Expenses, Army account in the House-passed Military Construction 

and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2015. Further, tbe Committee directs that future budget requests include all 

funding proposed for Arlington National Cemetery within the 

Cemeterial Expenses, Army account. 

ARMY INVENTORY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 

The Committee recognizes tbe difficulty of efficiently managing 

the retrograde of equipment and material from Afghanistan to military installations overseas and in the United States. The Committee understands that problems also extend to the cataloging, inventorying, and tracking of equipment at domestic bases because 

much of the cataloging and tracking of the data plates and bar 

codes for this equipment is accomplished with pen and paper. This 

process is slow, expensive, and can lead to errors in which equipment is lost, left behind, or sent to the wrong destination. The 

Committee is aware that the Army is testing automated inventory 

tracking and management solutions to capture data plate and bar 

code information and supports further testing and evaluation to determine if these solutions can be cost effective and time saving replacements for the current systems. The Committee supports the 

Army's efforts to automate its inventory management activities and 

to achieve cost savings associated with modernized systems. [jEst rt lo"l J0 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY,.---------1~ ;Y 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ..................... $36,311,160,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .. ........................ 39,316,857,000 

Committee recommendation ..................... 39,073,543,000 

Change from budget request ...... ............... -243,314,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $39,073,543,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Navy. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
~P~zffi~8~H~B~~~8~H~~s~~~8~~~a~8~F~8ef~8R~:------------------------------------~ 

DEFENSE GENERA TOR AND RAIL EQUIPMENT CENTER AT HILL AIR FORCE BASE 

The Committee understands that the Defense Generator and Rail Equipment 

Center (DGRC), located at Hill Air Force Base (AFB), needs significant 

renovations to address deficiencies, including some necessary for improved health 

and safety. Further, while DGRC is currently located within the boundaries of Hill 

AFB, the Committee is aware that after completion of the enhanced use lease 

project DGRC could be located outside of the boundaries and if so, would be 

required to provide its own force protection which would increase operational 

costs. The Committee urges the Secretary of the Army to work with the Secretary 

of the Air Force and relevant state and local stakeholders to address concerns 

raised by the current DGRC location and to reach an agreement acceptable to all 

parties on the future status and location of the DGRC. The Committee is also 

concerned that obligating funds to perform non-safety related renovations of the 

DGRC before a consensus is reached would not be a good use of limited 

resources. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army to 

limit renovations to those required only for health and safety until such an 

agreement is reached and to keep the congressional defense committees informed 

of all safety-related renovations performed, as well as a justification for why the 

renovations are required. 
65 

(DOLLARS 1'1 THOUSANDS I 

8l100ET COHMITTH CHANGE FROH 

REQUEST RECIIHI'IENOED REQUEST 

OI"ERATJON AND MAINTENAJ.ICE, NAVY 

BUDGET llCTIVITY 1; OPERATING FORCES 

AIR OPERATIONS 

" 1\l$51011 AND OTHER FLIGI1T OPERATIONS 4,9H.202 4,732,371 -214 '" 20 !'LEfT AIR TRAIHHIO. 1 ,647 '" 1,637,608 ·" "' 

" AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA AND ENGINEERING SERVICES " '" 36,828 -222 

.. AIR OPERATIONS ANO SAFETY SUPPORT 96, I 39 93,647 ·2 "' 

" AIR SYSniiS SUPPORT 363,763 353' 763 -10,000 

" AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE. '" "' 824,770 +10.000 

" AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT " "' 35,312 . 182 

" AVIATION I OGISTICS "' "' 344. 239 -6,402 

SHIP OPERATTONS 

" IIISSION AND OT'iER SHIP OPERATIONS. '" m 665.379 

'" SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND TR ... lNING 711' "' 710,$44 -699 

'" Sl!lP DEPOT HAI~TENANCE "' ... "' ... ., ,060 

>20 SttlP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,339,077 1 ,JJI '" -1 '915 

CO~SAT COI'IMUNICATIONSISUPPORT 

130 COI'\B"T COf'l~llNICIITJONS. 708.834 '" 2~0 -~.364 

'" HECUONIC WARFARE " . ~99 " '" ·• 

'" SP ... CE SYSTEMS liND SURVEILLANCE "' ,038 "' "' . ., 

"' WIIRF ... RE TACTlCS "' "' "' '" -166 

"' OPERHIONI\L f'IETEOROLOGV AltO OCEANOGRAPHV. "" "' '" 219 -BQ7 

"' COI\81\T SUPPORT FORCES "' "' 68~. 500 . 2' 818 

"' EOU!Pf'IENT M.O.JNTE..,IlNCE 126,48E! 128,~69 -117 

209 DEPOT OPERI\TJONS SUPPORT 2,472 2,H2 

"' COM6/I.TANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS, 101 ,200 97,909 ·3.291 

"' COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT. 168.920 188,623 -297 
66 

{OOLLA~S IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMH[TTH CHAIOGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOHKENDED REQUEST 

·········--· 

WEAPONS SUPPORT 

230 CRUISE HISSILE "' '" 109,298 -1.113 

2<0 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE. 1 '172 "' , '165,945 -6,1118 

'" IN-SERVICE WEA.PQNS SYSTEHS SUPPORT "' "' 104' 139 

'" WEAPONS HAl NTENANCE 490.911 490,031 -880 

"' OTHER WEI\PON SYSTEMS SUPPORT 324,861 324,861 

BASE SUPPORT 

290 ENTERPRISE INFOR~ATION TECHNOLOGY. 936,743 936,442 ·3C1 

'" FACILIHES SUSTIIHII'1ENT, RESTORATION & ~OOERNil.O.TION 1 463,495 1,631,845 +148,350 

>00 BAS£ OPERAHIIIG SUPPORT. 4' 399' 667 4,357,369 -41 .278 

TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 31,619,15~ 31.466.700 -150,455 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: "OBILIZAHON 

RE ... OY RESERVE AND PREPOSlTIONlNG FORCES 

320 S~ilP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE 526' 926 528.908 ·20 

'" READY RESERVE FORCE 291.195 291.195 

ACTIVATIONS /INACTIVATIONS 

310 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONSIINACTIVIIT!D"'S., 6, 704 6. 704 

"' SHIP ACTIVA.TIONSili!ACTlVAT!ONS 251 . 536 251 ,513 ·25 

~OBILIZATIDN PREPAREDNESS 

3•0 FLEET liOSPTTAL PROGRA~ 124,)23 124,294 ·20 

'"' INDUSTRIAL READINESS 2, 323 2, 323 

"' COAST GUA~O SUPPORT 20. 3~J 20,333 

~OTAL, BUDGET ACT lVlTY 2 1,223.342 1,223,250 " 
67 

I DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUOCET COMIIITTEE CHANGE FRO"' 

REQUEST REC0Mf1ENDEO REQUEST 

BUDGET ACTlVITY 3 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

ACCESS TON TRATNU~G 

"' OFFICER ACOUlSJTION. "' '" 155,542 "' JSO RECRUJT TRAINING 6.863 8,840 " 390 RESERVE OFF"ICERS TRAIN!N<l CORPS 148,150 148,082 ... BIISIC Sll!LLS AND ADVANCED TI<AINING 

'" SPEC!AlllED SKILL TRAININIJ 601 ,501 600.489 -1 ,012 

"0 FLIGHT TRAI~HIG 8,239 B, 221 ., <20 PROFESSIONAL OEVELOPHENT EOLICAT!ON 164,214 165, "' +958 

"' TRAINING SUPPORT. 162,619 "' "' -403 

RECRUITHIG, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION 

'" RECRU!TlNG AND A.OVERTISING 230' 589 231 '418 •829 

'" Off·OUTY AND VOLUNTIIRY EDUCATION., 115,595 115.472 -123 

'" ClV!LTAM EOUC.O.HON AND TRAINING. " "' 7J "' ·• "' 

"' JUNIOR ROTC " ,664 " "' ., 

TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 3. 1. 737.254 1,730.220 -1.034 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: AC~IN & SERV!CEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

SERVICEWIOE SUPPORT 

.. o ADMltt!SlRATIDN 858,871 847,881 -10,990 

'" EXTERKAL RELATIONS .. 12,807 " "' .JO 

>00 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AltO PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. 119,863 "' ,., -620 

'" llll[TARY MANPOWER AltO PERSONNEL MNAOEMENT 356, 113 '" '" -1 .2~7 

"' OTHeR PERSONNEL SUPPORT. 255' 605 252. '" -3.•60 

"' SERVICEW!OE COHI'IUNlCAT\CtiS 339. 802 "' "' -324 
68 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT 

550 SERVICEWJOE TRANSPORTATTON 

570 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 

580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM M.A.N!IGEIIENT. 

590 HU~l, MECHANICAL At/0 ELECTRICAL SUPPORT 

600 COHBAT /WEAPONS SYSTE~S. 

610 $PACE AND HECTRONIC WAAFARE SVSHHS. 

SEC\JRTTY PROGRAMS 

620 101\VAL !NV~STIGATIVE SERVICE 

SUPPORT OF OTHER NA liONS 

S8n INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES. 

OTHER PROGR/111$ 

OT~ER PROGRAMS 

TOTAL BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL COMPENSATION HlRl"'G LAG. 

TOTAL. QPE~TION /1140 HAHITENANCE, NAVY. 

SUOGET COI'IIIlTTH CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOIIII~NDED R£0UEST 

172.103 172,203 

283 '621 214,603 .g ,018 

1,111 '464 1' 106,994 -4,470 

., "' 43' 232 

25 '689 25,670 ., 73.1$9 73,047 • 112 

548,640 543' 429 -5,211 

4 '713 4, 713 

531,324 529. 524 ·1 '800 

4, 737 106 4,699,60~ -37 301 

-48,450 -48,4~0 

39,316.S5T 39.073.543 -243,314 
69 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thouaanlle of doll1rs] 

Budvef CommiU.• Ct.nga from ,,_, 1'1~111 Recammendad ,......, 1AIA utSSION AND OTHER FUGHT OPERATIONS 4,1)47,202 4,?32,371 -214,831 

OvelliS!imalion o1 !lying hours ·82.701 

Fual ccats- unjus11l<&d grow111 -100,000 

Trsi1SilortaHon cos!s- unjust~u~d growth -20,000 

FTE - unjuslified growth ·12, 130 

,.,. FLEET AIR TRAINING 1,647,943 1,1537,808 ·10,135 

Tralmng- unjustified growth -9,951 

FTE - unjuslili&d growlh -194 

,..,. AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA AND ENGINEERING 37,050 311.628 -222 

FTE • ul'ltustlfied growth ·222 

, ...... "'11'1 OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT 96,139 93,847 ·2,492 

Other services· unjustHoed growll'l -2,2110 

Consol~t1cn ot OOI'Itract nrvlces- untustllied growth .,., 

1A4N AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT 363,763 353,763 ·10,000 

Progl'llm related angineerlng logistics- unjusmied growlh _, 0.000 

1A5& AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE et4.no 824,710 10,000 

Program increase 10,000 

, ... AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 36,494 36,312 .. ., FTE · ~nj~s~tled growth ·137 

Consolidation ol eootfact seovices · ~njualilled growth . ., 1AU. AVIATION LOGISTICS 3So.G41 344,239 ..... Consohdat•on ol contract 6EIIVIC&6 • ~n)YSiil•Bd ~rOwlh ·6,402 

1828 SHIP OPERAnONS SUPPORT AND TRAINING 7!1,243 710,544 ·1199 

FTE · unjuslllled growth ·699 

1848 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE 5,296,408 5,2117,468 1,060 

FTE: - unjustlliad grOWth -9,940 

Program '"'"'""s" 10,000 

1858 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,339,077 1,337,162 ·1,915 

FTE · UhjUSlii>BC growth ·1,'i115 

1C1C COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS '"'·"" 703,250 -5,384 

Shore suppor1 ·unjustified growth ·5,000 

FTE. unjuslilieo growth -304 

1C2C ELECTRONIC WARFARE ,..., 91,$91 • FTE ·unJustified growth . , 1C3C SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE 207,038 2De,lln ., FTE · unjustlffed growth ., 1C4C WARFARE TACTICS 432,715 432,549 .... FTE. ~njuelilied grow!h ·166 

1C5C OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 331,118 J37,219 ..., FTE ·unjustified growtl1 -897 
70 

Budget Committee Change lrQm 

0.1 Re!lu .. t ~-nded Re!r:!"' 

""" COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 892,318 ....... -2,$18 

Travel administration ·unjustified growth ·2,815 

1C7C EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 128,488 128,369 -117 

CI)I1Solidation of conirael sef'llicas unjustlfied growth ·117 

tCCH COtotBAT ANT COMMANOfAS CORE OPERATIONS 101,200 "·"' -3,291 

DISA foek! s&eurity op~rat•ons- untuslrt•eo:l growth -1.500 

Management and prolesskJr>al su~or1 services -

unj~stll1ed growth -1,470 

FTE • IIO)U811~1ld growth ·321 

tCCM COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 188,920 18$.623 ... , FTE - unjus~fted growth ·297 

1010 CAUlS! MISSILE 109,911 109,298 ~ .. Coosolidal10!1 ol contract services- unjus~fiet:J growth -613 

1020 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE 1,112,823 1,165,948 -8,878 

Equipment maint&n!lno:a by conlraC1 · un)us~fied grow1h ~.000 

FTE -unjustified gro>Mh .,, 

1D<D WEAPONS MAINTENANCe 490,911 490,031 ~" F'TE • UPlJU511~ed grow1h ., Consa~datlor\ of cant rae\ sorvtces • unjustilled growth ·862 

OSIT ENTERPRISE JNFOFIIIIATlON TECHNOI.OClV t315,743 936,442 ·301 

F'TE • UPljV81rl•eO growth ·301 

FACillnES 8US7AINMENT, RESTORATION .. 

BSM1 MOD~ANI2ATION 1,483,49& 1,531,845 148,350 

Program lr'K:reaoo 148,350 

BS$1 BASE OPERATlNQ SUPPtmT 4,3Qll,667 4,357,388 ·41,271 

Quahty of service initiative· unj~sllfled growth ·40,971 

FTE . un)vstlfle<l growth ·7,807 

Non-NIP AFRICOM svpport 7.500 

2A1F :SHIP PRfPOSITlONING AND SURGE 828,926 528,110& ., FTE - vnj~al•lleO growth ., 2B2G SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS 251,538 251,513 ... FTE - ~njustrhed growlt> ·25 

2C1H FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM 124,323 124,294 ·" F~E • lJnjustrhed growth ., 3A1J OFfiCER ACQUISITION 115U14 155,.542 ·612 

FTE ·unjustified growth ., 

3A2J RECRUIT TRAINING 8,663 8,840 ., FTE · UPlJUSblied growth ·23 
71 

Budgtl Commltt" change !rom 

()-1 A!!jU"I Recomrntnct.d ~uelrt 

,..,, RESERVE OFFtcERS TAot.lNINO CORPS 141,150 148,082 ... FTE • unju.stili111d grOW'Ih ·" 3B1K SPECIALIZED SKILl. TRAINING 601,!101 600,489 ·1,012 

FTE- unjustltied growth ·1,012 

3821( FLIGHT TAAIMNG ..... 8,221 ·18 

FTE • UIIJU&tilied growth ·18 

383K PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 164,214 165,170 

FTE • unjustllleC Qt'OW!h ., "' SOCOM advanc~d ~ducation program· tran~ler from 

OM.DW 1,613 

3B4K TRAINING SUPPORT 182,619 182,216 ..., ~ TE • UII)USII~Eid growth -403 

3C1L RECRUITING AND ADVERTISINO 230,!58$ 231,418 

FTE • UII)Uatilied <;~rOWlh -319 '" ~a¥al S..a Cadet Corps 1.148 

3C3L OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 115,585 115,472 ·123 

FTE • unjustltted groW1h -123 

3C4L CIVlUAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 79,606 73,118 ·6.481 

WoriOOrce- unju.stthd growtt1 ·5,900 

FTE -unjustified growth ""' 3C5L JUNIOR ROTC 41,664 ., .... ., FTE · unjustified growlh ·12 

4A1M ADMINISTRATION 858,871 847,881 -10,990 

Admln•9lreti~ll lunct·ons · unjusii!JIId grow!h -9,000 

FTE . unjuslll•lld grOWlh -1.9\10 

..... EXTfRNAL RELATIONS 12,801 1a,1n ·30 

FTE · unjuslilled growth ·30 

4A3M CIVIliAN MANPOWER AND P!RSONN£1. 11i,863 11U43 ~" f-lt · UOjU.,Iili~ gr()W11'l ·820 

..... MILITARY MANPOWER AND P£!RSONNEL 3~UI,113 3~.uo -1,241 

FTE · UOJUSI~IM growt/"1 -1.247 

.... OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 255.605 252,145 -3,415-0 

Navy Hi81ory and Hentage Command- unjustified growth -2,862 

FTE · unjusm•ed growtll .,., 

·- SEFIVICEWtDf COMMUNICATIONS 339,802 339,478 4>< FTE • unjustified growth -324 

4S2N PLANNING, ENG.INEERINO AND DESIGN 283,021 274.603 -9,o1& 

E~dllio'lllry mi$$loos program ofli(:e · unjustille(:l gro""h -7,490 

FTE · unjuslllied growth -1,528 
72 

Budget Comminee Chan~ rrom 

D·> Regu .. c Reccmmencled ReguMt 

.. , ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 1,111.464 1,100,994 -4,470 

FTE- unjusti!•ed gl(lwth -4.~70 

4B6N COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS :lB,~ 25,670 ... FTE · unju~ti!•ed growth ·" 4fi7N SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS 73,159 ,._,., ·112 

"' unjustified grow!h ·112 

"'" NAVAL INVESTIGAnVE SERVICE 548,640 1543,429 ·11,211 

Travel · unjustilkod growth ·3..350 FTE • unjustl!t&o:! growth ·1,861 

"" OTHER PROGRAMS 531,324 5211.524 -1.800 Classified adjwstmanl -1.800 

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL COMPENSATION HIRING LAG -48,4!0 -48,450 
73 

TIRE SUCCESSOR INITIATIVE 

The Defense Logistics Agency established the Tire Successor Initiative (TSI) to contract with a non-tire manufacturer for tire contract management. However, the Department of the Nayy received 

an exemption from TSI for their existing tire contract. As a result 

of the exemption, the existing Navy tire contract is administered 

by a tire manufacturer, creating a perception of a lack of competition. Now that the Navy's existing tire contracts are set to expire, 

the Committee directs the Secretary of the Nayy to administer tire 

procurement through the Tire Successor Initiative as administered 

by the Defense Logistics Agency. 

SHIPBOARD LIGHTING SYSTEMS 

The Nayy is researching how to increase light-emitting diode 

supply and vendor capacity, decrease costs, and rapidly field solid 

state lighting on ships. The lighting program replaces existing fixtures on various ship classes to continue the savings associated 

with more efficient lighting methods. The Committee encourages 

the Secretary of the Nayy to continue to replace outdated and inefficient fixtures and urges the Secretary of the Navy to update the 

lighting specification standards. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ........................... ............... $5,397,605,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ........................ 5,909,487,000 

Committee recommendation .... . ......... ,.,.,,,,.,,,,,,,,,, 5,984,680,000 

Change from budget request ............. ................... +75,193,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $5,984,680,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps. The total amount 

recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
74 

lPOlLAA$ I~ THOUSANDS) 

OPERATION AND HIIINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 

SUOGET ACTIVITY 1 OPERATING FORCES 

[XPEOJT!OtlARY FORC(S 

10 OPERATIONAL FORCES. 

20 FJELD LOI31STICS 

30 DEPOT IIIII NTENANCE. 

USIIC PRFPOSITIONING 

40 MARll!ME PREPOSITIONING 

60 FACJL!TJES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATlON & MOOfRWTZATIQN 

70 BASE OPERATlWG SUPPORT 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

ACCESSHlN TRAINING 

eo RECRUIT TRAINING, 

90 OFFICER ACCUISlTION. 

BASIC SKill$ AND ADVANCED TRAINING 

100 SPECIALIZED SKILLS TRAINING 

120 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 

130 TRAINING SUPPORT 

RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINIMG EDUCATION 

140 RECRUITING AND ADVERTlSING 

1~0 OfF.OUTY A.NO VOLUNTARY EOIJCH!ON. 

160 JUNIOR ROTC 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3. 

DUOGET ACTIVITY 4, .O.O~IN & !;FRVTCEOilOfO ACTlVlTIES 

SERVTCEWIOE SUPPORT 

180 SERVICEWTDE TRA!-ISPOIHATION, 

190 ADI1INISTRI\TIDN 

200 ACQU1SIT10N AtiO PROGRAI1 11ANAGEI1ENT. 

SECURITY PROGRAMS 

SECURITY PROGRAI1S 

TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 

C!VJLIAN PERSONNEL COI1PENSATION HIRING LAG. 

TCTAL, OPERATION AND MAINT~NANCL MARIN[ CORPS 

BUDGET CO~l TTEE CHANGE FROH 

REQUEST RECD'IMENOED REQUEST 

905,744 939,544 +33. ~00 

921.543 921 .543 

229,058 239,058 +10,000 

ar,aao 87,660 

sn.926 631,319 +5!,393 

' 9R3, "" 1 '983' ''" 4' !01 "' 4,802 ,,, •101 '193 

" m 18,227 

'" '" 

" "" " "' ., '" " "' 330,156 330,156 

161 ,752 161.752 

19,137 19,137 

23,277 23.277 

694,250 ~94.250 

36.359 36.359 

362 '606 362. eo a 

'" "' '" '" 

" 706 .. 706 

'" "' 51~. 188 

·26,000 -26.000 

5,909,487 5,964,660 +7.'3 '193 
75 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LE\fEl ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thounm:ts of dollars] 

1A1A OPERATIONAL FORCES 

Special Purpose Marin11 Air GI'OUI1d Ta$k Force for 

CENTCOM · Marine Corp$ unfunded requWt!men1 

Spacial Purpose Marine Alr Ground TaP: Foree f~;~r 

SOUTHCOM • Marme Corps unfunded I$CIVil'(lll"'l3flt 

1A3A DEPOT MAINTENANCE 

Program Increase 

FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATIOI>l & 

BSM1 MQOERNIZATION 

Program inerease 

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL COMPENSATION HIRING LAG 

905,1'U 

Committee 

Re«Jmmended 

839,544 

28.600 

5,200 

239,0d8 

10.000 

831,319 

57,393 

-26,000 

Change from 

Rlogunt 

33,800 

10,000 

57,393 

-26,000 
76 

SPECIAL PURPOSE MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE 

Since its inception, the Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task 

Force-Crisis Response teams have responded successfully in several locations in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility. Their missions have included supporting local security operations, acting as a quick reaction force, conducting limited offensive and defensive operations, providing tactical recovery of aircraft 

and personnel, providing limited humanitarian assistance, and conducting limited non-combatant evacuation operations missions. The 

Committee is highly supportive of the Commandant's plan to provide Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force support to all 

combatant commands and has provided funding to establish teams 

in the Central Command and the Southern Command areas of responsibility. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ...... ................... $33,248,618,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ............... 35,331,193,000 

Committee recommendation ...................................................... ,..... 35,024,160,000 

Change from budget request ........ ................. -307,033,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $35,024,160,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Air Force. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
77 

(OOLlA~S IN THOUSANDS) 

Sl!OGET C0111'1ITTEE CHANGE FROI1 

REQUEST RECOMMENOEO REQUEST 

OPERATION AIIO HAINTENANCE, AIR fORCE 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

AlR OPERATIONS 

" PRHIARY COP!BAT FORCES. 3,163,457 3,073,802 ·89,655 

" CO~BAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES. 1,694,339 1,689,320 -5,019 

30 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING 1. 579.178 1 .560 '" -18,630 

;o DEPOT MAINTENANCE ,, 119.522 6,051 '400 -68,122 

eo FACJL!Tl ES SUSTATNI'IENT. RESTORATTOIII & MOOERIHZATION 1,453,589 1,598,948 +145,3~9 

70 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 2,599,41!1 2.54!1,844 -49.575 

COMBAT RELATED OPERATIONS 

eo GLOBAL CJ! A.NO CI\RLY WARNING. 908.790 869' 894 -38,896 

90 OTHER COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROGRI\P!S. S$6,306 856' 306 

,00 TACTICAL INTELLIGEHCE AND SPECIAL ACTIVITIES. BOO, 689 800' 689 

SPACE OPERATIONS 

"' LAlJNCH FAC LLl TIES. 262.110 262.710 

'" SPACE CONTROL SYSTHIS. 397 '" 397,818 

'" COI18ATP.NT COMMANDERS DTR~CT IITSSION SlJPPORT. '" '640 652.840 ·19,000 

HO CMBAT.O.NT COHMANOERS CORE OPE~ATIONS "' "' ;1.3T .34& 

1"0TAL. BUOCET ACTJVIT'f 1 .20' 1165' cos 20.821 ,459 ·14~.546 
78 

(DOLLARS HI THOUSA"OS) 

BUDGET CO~~ITTEE CHANGE FROK 

RECUEST RECOI'II'IENDEO ~EDUEST 

BUOGEl ACTIVITY 2: I'IOBILIZATION 

H08ll!n' OPERATIONS 

'" AIRLIFT OPERATIONS. \.969,810 1,939,173 ·29,637 

'" HOBILJZATION PREPAREDNESS. 139, '" 125.670 -14,073 

'" DEPOT I'IA!NTEAANCE , '534 "0 1,549,560 +15.000 

HO FACILITIES SUSTAlNHENT, RESTORATION 8o MODERNIZATION 173 '627 "' 089 +\5,462 

"0 BASE SUPPORT 688' 801 '" '" TOTAL, BUDGET ACTl\'ITY 2. (,505,541 4,492,293 ·I 3,248 

RUCGfT ACTIVITY 3; TRAHilNG AND RECRUITHIG 

ACCESSION TRAINING 

,go OFFJCER ACQU!Sl TION, . 82,396 82.396 

200 RECRUIT TRAHH/OG. 1~.852 19,852 

"' RESERVE OFFICER TRAUIING CORPS iROTC). 76,134 76, '" 220 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 1'\0DERNIZATION 212,226 '" ... +21 ,223 

"' SASE SUPPORT (ACAOEHlfS ONLY) 759' 809 759.8011 

BASlC SKlLLS llNO ADVANCED TRAINING 

'" SI'ECJII.LIZEO S~lLL TRII.JNING. "' "' 3ti8, 157 

"' FLIGHT TRAINING '" 594 697' 594 

'" PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION. 2HI.441 21!'1,441 

"' TRAINING SUPPORT. 91 ,001 91 '001 

200 DEPOT MII.HYTENANCE. 315,688 316.688 

RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING A~D EDVCATTON 

'" RECRIJ!TING A.NO ADVERTISJNG 73,92{1 73,920 

000 EXAM I NJNG 3, ,,, '· '" 

'" OFF DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION. '" ,718 '" "' 

"' Cl>IJUAN EDUCATION II.ND TRAINING. ,., '" 147 '667 

"' JUNIOR ROTC " ,0 " '" TOl'AL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 3. 3,30D,974 "' "' +21,223 
79 

I DOLLARS 1~ TIWUSANOS) 

SUOGET hCTTVITY 4• ADH!~ & SERVICE\o/IOE ACTIVITIES 

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 

340 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS., 

350 TECH!!lCAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES. 

360 OEPOT KA!NTENMICE. 

370 FACILITIES SUSTAIHHE'IT. RESTOIIATlON & ~ODERtlllATION 

380 eASE SUPPORT. 

SERVJCEW!OE ACTIVITIES 

390 ADHINISTRATtON 

400 SERVJC£WIDE COHHUNlCATIONS. 

410 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES. 

4~0 CIVIL Alii PATROL CORPORATION. 

SECURITY PROGRAMS 

SECURITY PROGRAMS .• 

SUPPORT TO OTHER NATIONS 

~SO INTERNAH~J\l SUPPORT. 

TOTAL, E!UDGET ACTlV[TY 4. 

OVEREST!I'IATE OF CIVIliAN FTE TARGETS. 

AOJACS FORCE STRUCTURE PROGRAN INCREASE, 

NUCLEAR FORCE li'IPROVEMENT PROGRAI'I 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. AIR FORCE. 

6UOGE1 COHH l 1 TEE CHANGE FROH 

REQUEST RECOHH£~0£0 REOUEST 

' 

,003,513 

643' 449 

78,126 

247.677 

103.442 

587,234 

~06 640 

892 2~6 

24 961 

1,169,736 

92.419 

6,559,673 

997 "' 

'" '" 

" "' 272,445 

1,103,442 

597 234 

SOB 840 

B92. 256 

27,400 

1,152,280 

92,419 

556.011 

-224,000 

34,600 

21 ,BOO 

35,331,193 35,024.160 

.6, 134 

. 7,239 

+24' 768 

-17 476 

-3,662 

-2H,OOO 

+3., BOO 

+21 ,600 
80 

EXPLAH,t,TlON OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dol'-rwJ 

D-1 

011 A PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 

Travel · unjustified program growth 

Unjust,Had program growth 

DttC COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES 

Studies, Analysts. and Evaluations- unjustified program 

,~, 

Retain u-2 -tund5 requested lor div11SI11ure ear'y lo n!led 

0110 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT. MAINTAIN SKILLS) 

Travel- unju&tified program grow1h 

011 M DEPOT MAINTENANCE 

UnJUSI~ied program growth 

Program incr$ase 

Ott A FACIUTIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 

Program 1ncrease 

011Z BASE SUPPORT 

Aemol'l'l one-time fiscal )'f!Br 20t41undlng incr!!ase 

CMiian Pay Program · unjualitled program growth 

Foreign curr~~ncy lluctuation pricing requested as 

Program growlh lor 1.1tilities 

01:2A OLOBAL C31 AND EARLY WARNING 

CYBERCOM direct mlss,on suppor111ne ·unjustified growth 

Justltk:atlon d~s not match summary ot p~ce and 

program changes for other Intra-governmental purchQJusti(icalion does not match summary of price and 

program changes for Studies, AnAiysi~ and E11alualions 

OU.A COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 

SUPPORT 

Ctassllied program reduct•on 

021A AIRLIFT OPERAT10NS 

Justification does not match summary of pnc9 and 

program chan~s for Hying hour program 

Justlflcat•on does not match summary ot price and 

program changes for non-DWCF aoulpment 

021 D MOBILIZATION PFifPAREDNESS 

lnf!alton ~ncing requested as program groWih 

021 M DEPOT MAINTENA.NCE 

Program 1.-.crease 

021R FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION&. 

MODERNIZATION 

Ju~tilicatiM does not me.lch summary of prloe and 

program chang~ts lor civililll"' pa~ program 

Program •ncrease 

.... ,., 

Requnt 

3,163,4~7 

1.604,339 

1,!i78,178 

1,453,589 

2,599,419 

908,791) 

871,\WO 

1,988,810 

1,534,560 

173,627 

3,073,8(]2 

-14,655 

-75,000 

1,889,320 

·2,640 

-2.379 

1,5e0,!540 

-18,638 

6.051,400 

-83,122 

15,000 

1,5i8,848 

145,359 

2,!549,844 

-10.000 

-34.732 

-4,843 

888,804 

·9,507 

·14.000 

852.840 

·19.000 

1.939,173 

-13.187 

-16.450 

12$.1$70 

·H,073 

1,549,1160 

15,000 

189.08\l 

-1.900 

17,362 

-18,630 

-68,122 

14!5,359 

·3B,8i6 

·19,000 

-29,637 

·14,073 

15,000 
81 

!kxigo< Commlttlltl C~trom 

o-• !!!gUHI Recommended R•gue.t 

031 R FACtUnES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 212,226 233.449 21,223 

Program oncrease :?1,:;>23 

041A LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 1.(103,!513 997,379 -6,134 

lnllaton pricing requested a& program growth -6,134 

041 B TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTtVmES &43,449 6315.210 -7,239 

Dt:~len&e Fir~ance and Accounting Setvices rate 

adju$tment requealeo' a.s program growttl -7,239 

04tR FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION 1o 

MODERNIZATION 247,677 n2,44ll 24,768 

Program Increase 24,766 

..,, CIVIL AIR PATROL 24,981 27,400 2.419 

Clv11 Air Petrol· program Increase 2,419 

.,. SECURITY PROGRAMS 1,169,736 1,152,260 -17,476 

Justification does not match summary of Price and 

program cha!'ges lor coV111an pay program -13,976 

Classified adjustment -3,600 

OVERESTIMATION OF CIVILIAN fTE TARGETS ·224,000 ......... AWACS FORCE STRUCTURE PROGRAM INCREASE 34,800 ,., ... NUCLEAR FORCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 21,&00 21,600 
82 

AIR FORCE FLYING HOUR METRICS 

The Committee is concerned that the Air Force has not developed 

a cost effective, goal oriented, metric based program on which to 

base its flying hour requirements and annual funding request. In 

fiscal year 2015, the Air Force requests significant increases for air 

operations and states that the requested funding for flying hours 

is based on available funds rather than any stated requirement. 

Further, a review of execution of previous fiscal years' flying hour 

programs shows that the Air Force consistently underexecutes its 

flying hour program. In these fiscally constrained times, ensuring 

that every dollar is spent to its maximum effectiveness means that 

flying to the budget instead of the readiness requirement risks significant waste of taxpayer resources. In addition, the lack of objective criteria or performance goals makes conducting objective, data 

driven analysis by the Committee impossible. 

The Committee strongly supports robust funding for flying hours 

and other training required to achieve pilot competence, safety, and 

combat readiness, and recognizes that providing sufficient funding 

for the flying hour program to achieve these goals requires significant investment and resources. Therefore, the Committee directs 

the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the air operations program and to report to the congressional defense committees at the time of its fiscal year 2016 budget 

submission the results of this review. As part of the review of the 

flying hour program, the Committee directs the Secretary of the 

Air Force to consult with experts including, but not limited to, the 

Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness, the Director of Cost 

Assessment and Program Evaluation, and the leadership at the 

Federally Funded Research and Development Centers, in order to 

establish metrics and goals for the flying hour program which will 

directly relate the flying hours requested in the budget to a clear, 

requirement-based training curriculum which will leverage limited 

resources in order to achieve maximum readiness. The Committee 

further directs the Secretary of the Air Force to review and revise 

the budget justification materials for the flying hours sub-activity 

groups in order to improve the clarity and completeness of those 

materials in future fiscal years, beginning with the fiscal year 2016 

budget submission. 

AIR FORCE WEAPON SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT 

The lack of objective data-driven metrics for the flying hour program has budget implications throughout the Operation and Maintenance, Air Force account. Within the Weapon System 

Sustainment (WSS) program, funding requirements for flying hours 

and depot maintenance are interrelated and can vary significantly 

depending on the number of flying hours executed. While the Air 

Force states that the WSS program is managed as an "enterprise 

level concept" and claims to regularly review the program in the 

year of execution to determine the actual requirement, the type 

and number of systems being inducted or work being performed 

can vary tremendously between what was included in the budget 

justification materials and what is actually executed. 
83 

Further, while the Air Force has improved its effort to capture 

all funding requested for depot maintenance, including contractor 

logistics support, in the depot maintenance sub-activity groups 

(SAGs), it is not yet able to fully differentiate between flight-line 

activities, for which funding should be requested in the aircraft operations and mission support SAGs, and depot maintenance activities, for which funding should be requested in the depot maintenance SAGs. The Committee remains concerned that the lack of fidelity and quality of the WSS and depot maintenance justification 

materials prevents the Committee from conducting meaningful 

analysis or oversight of either program. The Air Force acknowledges that its current justification materials could be seen as misleading, and the Committee understands that the Air Force will attempt to provide more useful, complete, and meaningful justification material for the WSS program in future fiscal years. While the 

Committee recognizes that requirements can change due to unexpected changes in mission or requirements during the fiscal year, 

it also believes that the Jack of program goals and metrics for the 

flying hour program drives much of the lack of fidelity in funding 

requirements in other areas, including WSS and depot maintenance funding. In addition to the review of the budget justification 

materials for the flying hours SAGs directed in previous report language, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to review and revise the budget justification materials for the mission 

support and depot maintenance SAGs to improve the clarity and 

completeness of those materials in future fiscal years, beginning 

with the fiscal year 2016 budget submission. 

AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND INFRASTRUCTURE 

The Committee recognizes the important role that the Air Education and Training Command plays in recruiting, training, and 

educating airmen. The Committee understands that flooding and 

other infrastructure challenges have adversely impacted facilities, 

equipment, operations, and training for airmen and encourages the 

Secretary of the Air Force to take steps to address these deficiencies. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .. ..................... $31,450,068,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ............................ ,.,,,,,,,,,..... 31,198,232,000 

Committee recommendation .................. .................. 30,896,741,000 

Change from budget request . - 301,491,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $30,896,741,000, 

for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide. The total amount 

recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
84 

I DOLLARS JN HiOIJSAHOS) 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFEHSE·WIDE 

BUDGET ACTIVJTY 1; OPERATING FORCES 

10 JOINT CHIEFS OF $T,1.FF. 

20 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COIIIIANC. 

TOTAL. BUOGn ACTIVITY 1 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

30 DEFENSE ACOUtS!TION UNlVERSJTY 

40 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY 

50 SPECIAL OPERATIONS C0!1HAND 

TOTAL. PUOGET ACTIVITY 3. 

BUDGET ACTtV!TY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVIiJES 

60 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS 

80 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY 

90 OE'FENSE CONTRACT !1AHAGEHENT AGENCV 

'"' DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY. 

'" DEFENSE U~FORMAHON SYSTEHS AGE~CY 

no DEFENSE LtGAL SERVICES AG£NCY. 

uo DEFHISE LOGISTICS AGENCY 

'" DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVlTY. 

'" DEFENSE POW IH!SSUIG PERSONS OFFICE. 

HO DCFENSE SECUAlTY COOPERATION AGENCY 

'" DEFENSE SECUIUT'I' SERVtC€. 

200 DEFENSE TECH!iOLOGY SECURITY AGENCY. 

DEFENSE THREAT REOVCTION AGENCY. 

230 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTlVITY. 

Bl!OGET COMMlTTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMI'IEMDEO RECIUEST 

462.,107 431.607 ·30,5-00 

762.245 ~.645,029 -117,216 

.<.24, 352 ~.076,636 -147.716 

135,437 135,437 

90. 08~ 90.082 

371 . 620 360. 443 ·11,177 

587.139 575.962 -11 ,177 

119,888 154.888 +35. 000 

556,493 556. 493 

1. 340,374 1. 299.874 . 40, 500 

633. 300 650, "225 +16.925 

. 263.678 1.260,833 -2 645 

26,710 " '" 

'"' . 470 391 '470 +10,000 

'" 520 190,920 -3.700 

" "' 21.485 

, .. "' 514,189 -30.597 

532,930 "' "' -592 

32.797 32 '" 414,371 '" "' 2.566,424 2.561 "' -5,001) 
85 

(DOLlARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COII~ITIEE CHANGE FRill'! 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REOIIEST 

240 i'!!SSTLE DEFEMSE AGENCY 416,644 452' 242 •35,598 

260 OFFICE OF ECONOI'!IC A.OJUSTIIENT. 186,987 186,987 

270 OFfiCE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1 '891 '163 1,869,931 ·21 '232 

280 SPECIAL OPERATIONS CONMANO. 67 '915 01.915 ·6.000 

290 WASklNGTOM HEADQUARTERS SERVICES. "' '" '" "' -23,720 

OTHER PROGRMIS. 13.563 '" 13,417 "' -145,935 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVJTY 4. 15.386 '" 25,204, 14~ -182,598 

IIIPACT AID. 40.000 •40, QOO 

TOTAL, OPEAATION AND IIAINTE~AHCE, OEFENSE-WIOE 31' 196,232 30.896.741 -301 ,491 
o., 

86 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thou.•nd• or dollars] 

Budget 

Raquest 

1PL 1 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 

Headquarlers- unjus~fied growth 

•&2,101 

JOflll Staff InformatiOn l>letwork- unju$lifie<l growl~ 

Penlagon ROilseruali<m Managemeot Revolving FundJustifie.a~on does not rnelch ~ummary of prie<~ aM 

program change$ 

1PL2 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND 4,762,245 

Sese aupp.:lrl- transfer to FSRM 

Combat develop men! act•voties. das!l<fted adjustments 

Flight operalio;m9- AVFID and ISR operalion& ur.)ua111ie<l growth 

Fhght operations- USASOC unju&tified growlh 

Flight operahons • humen performance progrom consolidation 

Flight operations- famil'y readmen coordinators unauthOiized 

Flight operation a . restore flying hours for readiness training 

Other operali0111- MAR SOC COIIi!le!'BI eqvipment e~cess to need 

Other Ope<"alions- MAR SOC collate<al equipmenl aarly to n!ffld 

Other opefalion~ - USASOC collateral eQuip men! early to ~eed 

Other op!!fahons -,Ill' SOC col!aleral equipmenl~t<~rly lo need 

Other opera lions- AFSOC col!aleral BQ\JIPmoef11 earty lo need 

Other opei"Btklns- LISASOC fiscal YMr 2014 collateral 

equipment s~hedule delay 

Other opere lions- NAVSPECWARCOM fiscal yasr 201~ 

collater91 eqUipment schedule delay 

Other opera lions- FOSOV opera! ions unjustir>ed growth 

0111Bf operaliona- USASOC 4th bat1al1on re'lrucll.lring excess grOWih 

Olt1Bf operations- family readiness c;oordinators unauthorized 

Oth0f opera lions- human pel'formai\CII program· transfer to DHP 

Olhef opera lions- human performance program- 1ransfer tc OHRA 

Other opera lion$- human performance program- lransl~r 

to RDTE,N line 2l 

Other operation• • transl11• to FSRM 

Other operations- paychological operalion& e~cen 

COOIIBC\11< p!iOQ growth 

Other operations- unjustified growth 

Other operations- unjuallfled gi'JWth 

Dttler opera lions· SOCAF exoeM growth 

Other operation a . persistent Bf1t1Bgement rent, u1111tles, 

ICASS e~cen grOWih 

Other operations- regional security cooperalion cente" 

authonzation adjuslment 

011\ef operations- SOCOM NCR aulhorizat1on adJustmenl 

Ship opera11011S. manUme suppot1 ~esse! aulhcnzat1on adjiJstmenl 

Ship optir;Uions- NSW rive nne program restO<e reduction 

CommunK:<uion~- C4tAS ul'ljU$1ifled growth 

Ccmmumcati<Jns- HQ C4 SITEC UJ'\just•filld growth 

Cammumcations. SOF deployabl\1 nodes exces.s growth 

Ccmmunicalions . SOF tactical communications e~ceu growth 

lntelhgan~e- DCGS-SOF au1hOI'U:allon adjustment 

lntelligenC$. Ovil:an growth- transfer to PIA MIP 

lntelhgence- ~llS$ilied program unjustifwd 

lnlelligence · UllJUSllf•ed growth 

Intelligence. human performance program C008<llirJation 

Management/operational HQ -care c<Jalrtion restore reducl•on 

Operpt,ooel support- 4th Batlal1on transformation exOEiu growth 

431.607 

-15,000 

~.000 

-11.500 

4,645,029 

-3,213 

-51,520 

-2,718 

-1.313 

-t1,300 

·2,300 

124,729 

-2,908 

-2,602 

-2.538 

·3,797 

-918 

10.467 

5,321 

-2,123 

-6,220 

-2,700 

-14.800 

~.000 

.4,200 

·9.~72 

-3,000 

-9.937 

-9.214 

-2,000 

-7.000 

-~.000 

-20.298 

2.826 

·21,134 

-9,126 

.4,336 

·2.500 

-3.900 

·1,402 

.4,900 

-4,214 

.4,000 

2.2~9 

-5,300 

-30,500 

-117,216 
87 

Budget Committee Change from 

0·1 R&quell R&eomm&ndld Re!:jUetlt 

FSRM- transfer from olhM SAGs 12.,685 

Contr~d~ fur other services - 9111111ral reduclion -26,000 

JEV7 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND 371,620 :'I&O,U3 -11.117 

P~nional development. advanced educalian program -2,000 

unjustifi~ IJrowth 

Proleuional da~etopment • JSOU accredilallon -7,56<1 

unauthonzed 

Adva~ &d~calion prog111m- lral'\liFer to OM.N -1.613 

4GT3 Clvtl MIL1T.6.RY PROGRAMS 11'1,888 15-4,888 3!5,000 

Youth Cha~enge 10,000 

STARBASE 25,000 

4QTO DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 1,340,374 1,299,874 -40,$011 

Ci'liltan personnfll oompgnu~lioo- ju$1i~CIIIoOJ\ Qoes r'JQI -20.500 

match 11.ummary of price and program cr.a!lQBS 

Crvrlian per;onnel eompeMel1on tliringlag -20.000 

4GTB DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY 633,300 650,22!5 16,925 

De'lense CMitan Pe~onnel Advisory SeNK:e. unjustified -5,845 ,_ 

Civoli<lr~ P<~•sonnel compensation hiring lag -1.230 

SuiClde Prevent<on Oflica · progr11m ino;rea:;e 20.000 

Surc.de Prewmtooo · tran51eo' from SOCOM •.000 

4GT9 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY 1,t&3.678 1,280,833 -2,84$ 

Pentagon Res!Hvalion Management Revolving Fund - -2.~5 

JUsllflcatlon don not match s~..mmary of price and P'fOQram 

change 

4GTB OEFEI<ISE LOGISTICS AGENCY U1,410 391,470 10,000 

Procuremer1t Technical A$sistance Program 10,000 

ES11 OEFENSE MEOlA ACTIVITY 194,.520 190,820 -3.700 

CIVilian ll(lrsonnet r:;otl"lpeMBiiCin- juahfication r;lou not -3,700 

match aummary ol price and program changes 

4GTO OEFEtlSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY S44,786 514,1119 -30,597 

Adlf'ir>;atratlon expenee1- untuat;"ed growl!\ -2.500 

rettowahip programs· unjuet•fl11d growth -2.~ 

Gtob!ll S11runty CoopeniiiDn Managl!ml!nt lnforrrrafion 497 

CiYilian personnel compensallor>- justifiCBtlon does nl)l -5.200 

Global Securrt;r CDflli~ncy Fund· adju1tment fDr -30.000 

Warsaw lnitiatWII Fund/Partnership lor Peacu Program 10.000 

4GTI!: OfFENSE SECUtmY SERVICE 532,930 532.338 ., Cfvitian personfiE!I compensatloo hiring tag -592 

4GT J DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY 2,566,424 2,561,424 -5,000 

Consohdstion efforts- unjustlf111d growth -5.000 

011A MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 416,644 452,242 lMt& 

Trsnsler frorn RDTE.OW line 179 38.9QB 

Unjustified grow\h -1,<100 

4GHI OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1.8t1,183 1,8&9,931 -21,232 

Headquarters support tor othe' programs and initiatives- 430 

unjustified growth 
88 

Budget Committee Ch•n1111 from O-• R&qunt Recommended ... ~. 

Capital security cO$! sharing- l.l'lJU&tifiad growth -49.051 

Boards, Commis11ions and Ta1k Force- uoju~;tiFoed growth -1.365 

OSD Polley- unjustiHed growth -3,623 

OSD Complrol~r .. unjustl~ed grawlh -2,483 

OSD PerBOnnel and Readinoss - unlu&tlfted gmwih -3,100 

BRAC 2015 rounc:l planning and 8'fl!!>lyle$- eurty to need ~.800 

OSD AT&L. ROTE Over~;ghl- unju~Hfled grQW\11 -1.380 

Office ol Net Assessment- program Increase 20.000 

ASO SOUC prugrsm tncrease lot USSOCOM over~111hl 2.000 

Readiness environmental prcteclion lrllllatlve . progra'Tl 15,000 

Increase 

050 Comptrollar- audit rl!adinau program increase 0.000 

4GT1 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND 87,&15 81.915 -uoo Spedalired Skills Treining • Speoal Warfare Cer.ter ~-"" a•ce'IIS growth 

4GTQ WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES 810,982 587,262 -23,720 

Civilian t~ersonntl compenulion hiring lag •2.,520 

Facilitias- juaiiAcaHon does not malcto aummary of price -21.200 

and pri)Qram ehengee 

'"' OTHER PROGRAMS 13,563,834 13,417,899 ·14UJ5 

Clan1fi8d adjuslmenl -fo4.5.935 

IMPACT AID 40,000 40,!tGO 
89 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-QPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

FUNDING 

The Committee recommends a total of $5,087,384,000 for the 

Special Operations Command (SOCOM) operation and maintenance funding, an increase of $305,441,000, or six percent over the 

fiscal year 2014 enacted level. In addition, the recommendation 

transfers $32,000,000 originally requested within the SOCOM 

budget to other Department of Defense agencies better equipped to 

address the needs of the special operations community. The recommendation reflects the Committee's continued commitment to 

ensure that the necessary resources are provided to maintain and 

support the readiness of special operators. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-FLYING HOURS RESTORATION 

The Committee recommendation provides an increase of 

$124,729,000 above the request for the flying hour program of the 

Special Operations Command (SOCOM). The Committee is disappointed that, again this year, the fiscal year 2015 base budget 

for SOCOM proposes a reduction to baseline flying hours which 

would result in only 67 percent of the training requirement being 

met. The Committee is concerned that while the overall SOCOM 

budget request represents a nine percent increase over the fiscal 

year 2014 enacted level, flying hour requirements were not 

prioritized within the request but rather listed as SOCOM's top unfunded priority. With anticipated reductions in operational flying 

hours funded in the overseas contingency operations budget due to 

the Mghanistan drawdown, it is important that baseline SOCOM 

flying hours training be preserved to maintain pilot proficiency. 

Therefore, the Committee recommendation restores the proposed 

flying hours reduction and provides the full amount identified on 

SOC OM's unfunded priority list. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-BUDGET JUSTIFICATION 

The Committee is pleased with the progress made to address 

concerns regarding the annual congressional budget justification 

submission. The fiscal year 2015 budget submission was a marked 

improvement over previous years. The Committee appreciates that 

changes to the submission require a tremendous effort on the part 

of the staffs of the Comptroller, Special Operations for Financial 

Management (SOFM), the individual components, and the Under 

Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and they are to be commended 

for their work. 

After consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), the Committee agreed to a phased approach to conform the 

Special Operations Command <SOCOM) budget justification materials to the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation (FMR) Volume 2A, Chapter 3, as it applies to the Services. A 

two year transition was proposed to establish sub-activity groups 

and line item/program elements as part of the budget justification 

submission. The Committee appreciates that it received this level 

of detail informally from SOCOM during the fiscal year 2015 budget review process. The Committee directs that the fiscal year 2016 

submission delineate SOCOM's operation and maintenance budget 
90 

at this level of detail in the formal justification material. The Committee further directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) 

and the Comptroller, SOFM to consult with the Committee during 

development of the fiscal year 2016 budget submission on actions 

being taken to make these necessary changes not later than October 1, 2014. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE 

The Committee is concerned that the Special Operations Command (SOCOM) has not complied with longstanding Department of 

Defense regulations requiring submission of a prior approval reprogramming request prior to the initiation of a new start as it pertains to operation and maintenance programs. Over the last two 

years, SOCOM has initiated significant new programs, contracts, 

and activities that were not previously identified or explicitly justified in budget justification materials without submitting a reprogramming request for approval. SOCOM has also started programs and activities prior to receiving funding approval in the applicable appropriations Acts. 

The Committee understands that the characteristics of operation 

and maintenance programs are such that new starts do not occur 

with the same frequency as acquisition programs. However, there 

are new starts in operation and maintenance accounts and, as 

such, established reprogramming procedures must be followed. Specifically, Department of Defense Federal Management Regulation, 

Volume 3, Chapter 6, section 060903D states that for operation and 

maintenance accounts '~new starts would be significant new programs, contracts, or activities that have not been explicitly justified 

to the Congress in budget justification material." The Committee 

directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to review this 

matter and issue any necessary clarifying guidance to SOCOM and 

report actions taken to the Committee not later than 60 days after 

the enactment of this Act to ensure full compliance with established regulations. The Committee strongly encourages the Commander of SOCOM to consult with the Committee as necessary. 

Finally, the Committee notes that language is included elsewhere 

in the Committee report reminding the Secretary of Defense that 

reductions included in the project level tables are to be treated as 

congressional interest items and thus cannot be restored through 

the use of below threshold reprogramming actions. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-USE OF MAJOR FORCE PROGRAM-11 

FUNDS 

In fiscal year 2014, the Committee raised concerns regarding the 

Special Operations Command (SOCOM) use of Major Force Program-11 (MFP-11) funds for non-MFP-11 activities. MFP-11 funds 

are to be used only to acquire and/or develop special operations 

forces (SOF)-peculiar materiel, supplies, and/or services, rather 

than to supplement or supplant activities that are or should be provided by the military Services. The Committee's review of the report provided in accordance with the Consolidated Appropriations 

Act for fiscal year 2014 has raised concerns that SOCOM used a 

waiver process to use MFP-11 funds for otherwise ineligible activities in a manner inconsistent with existing Department of Defense 
91 

directives and regulations. The Committee appreciates the actions 

being taken by the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and 

the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low 

Intensity Conflict to revise the process used to grant waivers from 

the restrictions on the use of MFP-11 funds, including the requirement for quarterly notifications. The Committee directs the Under 

Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to submit a report not later 

than 60 days after the enactment of this Act that describes the revised process and to submit a quarterly report listing all waivers 

granted and the justification for each waiver. 

The Committee also directs the Under Secretary of Defense 

(Comptroller) to ensure that the fiscal year 2016 congressional 

budget justification clearly identifies and justifies all MFP-11 operation and maintenance funding for programs and activities for 

which the Services or other defense agencies previously had responsibility for funding, including those related to special operations, the justification for the use of MFP-11 funds, and/or the 

funds that would be transferred between the MFP-11 budget and 

other Major Force Program budgets and the justification for such 

transfers. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-QVERSIGHT 

Over the years, concerns have been raised regarding the ability 

of the Department of Defense to conduct the same level of oversight 

over Special Operations Command (SOCOM) activities and funding 

as is applied to the Services and other defense agencies. In an era 

of declining resources and when faced with difficult choices to preserve the most critical capabilities of the Department of Defense, 

vigorous oversight of all programs and activities is required. The 

Committee notes that at a time when the Services are facing significant reductions in their manpower and budget requests, 

SOCOM manpower and budget requests increase in fiscal year 

2015. The Committee appreciates the commitment of the Assistant 

Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict (ASD SOLIC) to provide oversight and looks forward to his recommendations for ways to improve the oversight of SOCOM. The 

Committee recommendation includes an increase of $2,000,000 

under the Office of the Secretary of Defense (Policy) for the Office 

of ASD SOLIC for additional staffing to provide necessary oversight. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION 

Subsequent to the fiscal year 2015 budget request submission, 

the Special Operations Command (SOCOM) notified the Committee 

that it no longer intended to pursue a waiver of section 8018 of the 

Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 in order to establish an additional SOCOM office in the Washington, D.C. area. 

Therefore, the Committee recommendation does not include 

$5,000,000 to establish a Special Operations Command-National 

Capital Region entity. 
92 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-8U!CIDE PREVENTION AND 

PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH 

The Committee understands the toll that more than a decade of 

war has taken on all servicemembers and their families, including 

special operators. The Committee has always made the care of all 

servicemembers and their families its highest priority, including 

the special operations community. 

The Committee is extremely concerned that the suicide rate for 

special operators has continued to increase since calendar year 

2010, and for the past two years the suicide rate within the special 

operations force has surpassed those of the Services. The Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 provided $17,800,000, 

the full amount requested by the Special Operations Command 

(SOCOM), under the Defense Health Program to accelerate the expansion of the embedded behavioral health program to the entire 

special operations community in an effort to address the psychological health of the force. 

While SOCOM has requested significant increases in both fiscal 

years 2014 and 2015 for the Command's Preservation of the Force 

and Family Initiative, the Committee notes that this initiative and 

the corresponding budget requests have been heavily focused on a 

human performance program. The human performance program 

has emphasized physical readiness with costly military construction and multi-year service contracts for physical therapists, 

strength and conditioning specialists, athletic trainers, and sports 

dieticians. At the same time, SOCOM has not requested funding 

for targeted suicide prevention programs. According to SOCOM, 

suicide prevention efforts have been minimal and met as unfunded 

requirements. Further, the Committee is aware that SOCOM only 

recently signed and promulgated a force-wide Suicide Prevention 

Policy Memorandum dated March 31, 2014. 

The Committee shares the concerns expressed in the Housepassed National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2015 regarding the current emphasis on the human performance program 

and agrees that suicide prevention and the psychological health of 

the force must be given the highest priority. Therefore, the Committee recommends a transfer of $18,800,000 from the amount requested for the human performance program to bolster the psychological health of the force as follows: $14,800,000 to the Defense 

Health Program for behavioral health and warrior care management, providing a total of $29,600,000; and $4,000,000 to the Office 

of Suicide Prevention to implement the recommendations of the review and report on suicide among members of the special operations forces as mandated in section 581 of the House-passed National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2015. 

The Committee also provides $1,200,000 for chaplain training, as 

requested, and expects that training emphasis will be placed on 

suicide prevention training and awareness efforts within the special operations community. 
93 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-HUMAN PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE 

PROGRAM 

The Committee recommends a total of $24,200,000 to support the 

physical training programs for the Special Operations Command 

(SOCOM). While the budget justification documentation included 

funding within multiple sub-activity groups for the human performance program, the Committee recommendation consolidates all 

funding for human performance contract personnel across the entire special operations force (SOF) enterprise within the other operations sub-activity group. The recommendation provides a total of 

$20,000,000 for the SOF enterprise for human performance contracts, an increase of $3,500,000 above the fiscal year 2014 enacted 

level. 

The Committee has long supported physical training programs to 

ensure that special operators are in tap physical condition to 

achieve their mission. As the Committee noted in fiscal year 2014, 

past training approaches used by SOCOM varied by component 

and were not scientifically based to address the unique requirements of special operators. Further, the training needs vary sigoificantly between special operators based on their mission set. In fiscal year 2007, at the request of SOC OM, the Committee began to 

fund the Tactical Athlete Program within the Department of the 

Navy to provide the necessary scientific research for each individual type of SOF operator in order to desigo appropriate physical 

training programs to meet those specialized needs. This approach 

was previously used by the Department of the Army to successfully 

develop a training program for the 101st Airborne Division. The 

Committee continues to believe that the completion of this research 

program for all SOF components and its corresponding results will 

provide research-based injury prevention and performance optimization solutions and will enable the design of training programs 

uniquely tailored to the needs of special operators in the most productive and cost effective manner possible. The Committee is disappointed that while SOCOM has publicly endorsed this research 

effort, it has not requested funds to complete the multi-year research programs being conducted for Air Force, Army, and Marine 

Corps special operations components. Therefore, the recommendation transfers $4,200,000 from SOCOM's human performance program to the Department of the Navy to complete these ongoing assessments. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-ADVANCED EDUCATION PROGRAM 

The fiscal year 2015 budget request includes $4,473,000 for Advanced Education programs for special operations forces (SOF), an 

increase of $3,4 73,000 over the fiscal year 2014 enacted level. The 

Committee supports professional military education opportunities 

for all servicemembers, including those in the SOF community. 

However, professional military education is a Service-managed and 

funded responsibility to ensure equitable opportunities for all 

servicemembers given that the Services are responsible for managing career promotion and command selection decisions. The Committee continues to question the request of the Special Operations 

Command (SOCOM) to use SOF funding to augment SOF partici-
94 

pation in established Service and civilian programs outside of the 

normal funding and selection process. The Committee also questions whether SOCOM's proposal to expand education programs to 

fellowship, doctorate, and executive programs with the private sec~ 

tor meets existing Department of Defense regulations. 

The Committee notes that the House-passed National Defense 

Authorization Act for fiscal year 2015 directs the Secretary of Defense to submit an assessment of SOCOM's master's degree requirements. The Committee believes that the results of that review 

will assist in providing a better understanding of SOF advanced 

education requirements, as well as how existing programs are addressing these requirements. 

Finally, the Committee is concerned that SOCOM began the establishment of several new programs in fiscal year 2013 prior to 

seeking and receiving the necessary congressional approvals for 

these programs. For example, SOCOM executed an agreement with 

the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) to provide Major Force Program-11 funds for expanded SOF participation when no funds were 

appropriated for this effort. This resulted in unnecessary stress and 

confusion on the part of the impacted servicemembers. Therefore, 

the Committee recommendation transfers $1,613,000 from the 

SO COM operation and maintenance account to the Naval Postgraduate School account to ensure appropriate program and budget 

oversight of NPS programs. Additionally, the Committee recommendation includes a reduction of $2,000,000 from the request 

based on concerns regarding duplication and unvalidated requirements. The remaining $860,000 is not to be obligated until 30 days 

after the congressional defense committees have received the Secretary's assessment as directed by the House-passed National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2015 and SOCOM has provided a spend plan for the use of the funds which explains the 

SOF-unique requirements for which no other Department of Defense or Service program exists. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-CLASSIFIED ADJUSTMENTS 

Further explanation and direction regarding the classified programs and recommendations for the Special Operations Command 

is contained in the classified annex accompanying this report. 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY 

The Committee is concerned about the perceived lack of progress 

on energy efficiency initiatives within the Department of Defense. 

Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 

180 days after the enactment of this Act on the energy use and energy efficiency projects at the Pentagon and the ten largest Department of Defense facilities. The report shall include, but is not limited to, an analysis of energy use at the Pentagon Reservation and 

the ten largest facilities; an accounting, including dates, of when 

energy audits and energy efficiency projects have been conducted 

at such facilities; and an accounting of energy savings projects that 

could be achieved by enacting a consistent, timely, and proper mechanical insulation maintenance program and upgrading mechanical insulation at such facilities. 
95 

COMMERCIAL JOINT MAPPING TOOLKIT 

The Committee is concerned with the ability of combatant commanders to exploit data provided by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) in environments with limited bandwidths. 

The Committee directs the Director of NGA, in coordination with 

the Under Secretary of Defense (Intelligence), to submit a report 

not later than 60 days after the enactment of this Act, to the congressional defense and intelligence committees, that details an acquisition strategy, which includes cost and schedule data, for a 

competitive Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit follow-on program 

that supports the combatant commands' requirements for exploitation and dissemination of NGA data in limited bandwidth operational environments. 

AUTOMATED CONTINUOUS EVALUATION SYSTEM 

The Committee understands that the Automated Continuous 

Evaluation System (ACES) was developed by the Defense Personnel Security Research Center and is the program that the Department of Defense and the Office of Management and Budget 

recommend as the enterprise solution for government-wide continuous personnel security evaluations. The Committee further understands that there is an Army pilot program on personnel security 

evaluation that is being used interchangeably with ACES. The 

Committee believes that these are two different programs and 

should be referred to as such. 

The Committee believes that the granting of a security clearance 

for Department of Defense personnel is an inherently governmental 

function of the Department of Defense. Therefore, the Committee 

directs the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 120 days after the enactment of this Act, on the feasibility and costs associated with the 

Department of Defense assuming the responsibilities of conducting 

security clearance investigation activities for all Department of Defense personnel. 

The Committee also encourages the Secretary of Defense to consider measures to optimize and streamline data sharing and best 

practices for continuous personnel security evaluations and threat 

analysis. 

OVERSEAS MILITARY INSTALLATION INVENTORY 

The Committee looks forward to receiving the Secretary of Defense's report on the inventory of United States military installations located overseas as directed in the explanatory statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 

2014. The Committee expects that the report will include an assessment of the requirements for overseas military force structure 

and infrastructure, an inventory of potentially excess infrastructure, and any opportunities for infrastructure consolidation. 

SPARE PARTS MANAGEMENT 

The Committee understands that the Department of Defense is 

implementing its Comprehensive Inventory Management Improvement Plan to address inefficiencies and unnecessary expenditures 
96 

in the management of spare parts. The Committee supports these 

efforts but continues to monitor the progress of implementation. 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 120 

days after the enactment of this Act on further implementation of 

the Comprehensive Inventory Management Improvement Plan. The 

report should include details of the efforts to strengthen demand 

forecasting, visibility of on-hand inventory, reviews of on-order excess inventory, and management of inventory held for economic 

and contingency reasons. Additionally, the report should include a 

summary of the efforts to establish a standardized set of supply 

chain and inventory management metrics to measure key attributes including materiel readiness, responsiveness, reliability, 

cost, and planning and precision of supply chain management operations. 

TRANSPORTABLE, MODULAR, RENEWABLE ENERGY PLATFORMS 

The Committee supports efforts by the Department of Defense to 

invest in cost-saving energy measures, including transportable, 

modular, renewable energy platforms that reduce the warfighter's 

reliance on traditional fuel supplies in theater. 

NATIONAL SECURITY EDUCATION PROGRAM 

The Committee understands that the National Security Education Program (NSEP) plays an important role in increasing the 

pool of cultural and linguistic experts in government, and it supports Department of Defense and other government agencies efforts 

to partner with higher education institutions to achieve the goals 

of the NSEP. The Committee believes that these efforts should continue to consider minority serving institutions, such as Historically 

Black Colleges and Universities, to ensure diversity within the intelligence community and to increase the number of analysts with 

proficiency in critical languages and cultural studies, including 

Chinese, Farsi, and Arabic. 

AUDIT READINESS 

By September 30, 2017, the Department of Defense is required 

to validate its financial statements as ready for audit. To prepare 

for this milestone, the Department has focused its efforts in two 

broad areas. First, processes, controls, and systems that produce 

budgetary information and support the Statement of Budgetary Resources have been strengthened. Second, the accuracy and reliability of management information in several critical areas, including military equipment and real property, has been improved. The 

Government Accountability Office highlighted remaining challenges 

associated with identifying and mitigating risks to achieving the 

goals of the Department's Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) effort in a May 2013 review. Successful implementation of the FIAR guidance by the Services and defense agencies, 

modernizing business information systems, and improving the financial management workforce are essential to preparing for the 

September 2017 milestone. Accordingly, the Committee provides 

$8,000,000 above the request for the Under Secretary of Defense 
97 

(Comptroller) to improve business and financial systems throughout the Department to achieve audit readiness. 

CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES 

The Committee supports the Department of Defense's investments in cloud computing services for the Joint Information Environment. The Committee is aware of many options for cloud computing services and payment strategies for users to purchase cloud 

computing services. In order to provide further insight into the Department's cloud computing strategy, the Committee directs the 

Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense to submit 

a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 90 

days after the enactment of this Act on the adoption and potential 

expansion of cloud computing within the Department, Services and 

defense agencies. The report shall include an update on the use of 

commercial cloud computing services in the Department of Defense, 

the current plans for the expansion of cloud computing, the purchasing and billing methodologies being proposed, an analysis of 

the costs, and if applicable, the savings associated with the utilization of cloud computing within the Department over the future 

years defense plan. 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .. ..... ...................... $2,940,936,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .................. .................. 2,490,569,000 

Committee recommendation . ............... 2,535,606,000 

Change from budget request +45,037,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,535,606,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve. The total amount 

recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
TRANSPORTATION COSTS FOR COMMISSARY GOODS 

The Committee supports the Defense Commissary system and the benefits it 

yields to servicemembers worldwide. Historically, the Department of Defense has 

subsidized the secondary transportation costs for commissary goods shipped 

overseas. The Committee now understands that the Defense Commissary Agency 

plans to re-compete the contracts for delivery of fresh ftuits and vegetables and 

will require that proposed prices for goods include secondary transportation costs, 

thereby passing the costs for these goods on to commissary customers. 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees on the proposed change in procurement and 

transportation policies for commissary goods. Further, the Committee directs that 

the cutTent policies and procedures associated with second destination shipping for 

commissaries cannot be modified until the report is delivered and the committees 

have 30 days to review and approve the proposed changes included in the report. 
98 

(DOLLARS I~ THOUSANDS) 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. ARI1Y RESERVE 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 OPERAT!NO FORCES 

LAND FORCES 

10 MANEUVER UN ITS. 

20 !'100ULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES. 

30 FCHHONS ABOVE BRIGADES 

40 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 

50 LAND FORCES OPERA liONS SUPPORT. 

60 AVIATION /t.SSETS. 

LAND FORCES REAOHIESS 

70 FORCES READ! NESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 

80 LAND FORCES SYSTEM R~ADINESS 

90 DEPOT MINTENANCE, 

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPQRT 

110 FACILlT[ES SUSTAINMENT. RESTORATION & !'IOOERNIZATION 

110 11ANAGEHENT ii.NO OPERATJONS HEADQUARTERS 

TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY I 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: AOI'IlN 11 SERVICEWIOE A.CTlVITIES 

AONJNISTRATION AND SERVICEWTOE ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 

140 AOMJHISTRATION. 

150 SERVICEWIOE COHI'IUMICATIONS 

160 PfRSOHNfl!fiNANCIAl ADMINISTRATJO~ 

170 RECRUITI~G AND ADVERTTSI~G 

TOTAL. BIJOGET ACTIVITY 4,. 

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS. 

RESTORE REAOINESS 

TOTAL, DPEAATlON AND MINTENANCE, ARMY fi:ESERVE. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST REC01111ENDED REQUEST 

15,200 15.200 

.502. 664 41Xl.27S -3' 369 

107,489 105,242 -2,247 

543' 989 530,162 

!2,963 64,463 -8.500 

360.082 360' 082 

72,491 12.491 

58 "' 58' 873 

"' '" "' "' 220 '" "' '457 

39.590 39 . .590 

Z,390.899 2.385.796 ·5, 103 

10,608 10,608 

" '" 17' 527 ·1 '060 

'" 6,681 

9' 192 9 '192 

" "' " "' 99,670 98,610 ·1 ,060 

. 13,000 -1~ ,aoo 

65,000 +65. 000 

2,4.90.569 2,535,606 +45,037 
99 

U:PLANAT10N OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

{In thouBincla of dallaral 

0-1 

113 ECHELONS ,t,BOVE BRIGADES 

Tra..e~ • un)ustrnec program growlh 

114 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 

Traver . unjustrfied program growth 

11!1 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 

Justitica1ion does not march summary of price ar"'d 

program changes lor drsabil•ty oompensation 

Travel· unjust~red program growlh 

Managemenr and prole6Sional svppol\ services· 

unrustitred growth 

Regror~al Training Sites-Medical ad~isory and assistance 

services contract · translar to SAG 121 nor pmperly 

accounrad 

116 AVIATION ASSETS 

F¥ng nour prog111m. r,mjuelillad program growlh 

132 FACIUTIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION 

Program increase 

43, ADMINISTRATION 

Travel- un)uslihod program growth 

OVERESTIMATION OF CIVILIAN FTE TAR~ US 

RESTORE REAOINf.SS 

Budget 

ReqUIIat 

502,564 

107,48t 

!43,98t 

72,9413 

228,597 

18,587 

Commlttu 

R.oomm•nded 

4t0,27tl 

·3.389 

105,242 

·2,247 

!530,162 

·2.860 

-1.604 

·3,522 

·5.841 

64,463 

·8.500 

251,4!7 

22.860 

17,527 

-1,060 

-13,800 

6~.000 

Change from 

Ropat 

-3,381 

-2,247 

·13,827 

-8,0100 

22,680 

-1.060 

·13,800 

8$,000 
100 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ..................... , ................ .................. $1,158,382,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ................. 1,007,100,000 

Committee recommendation .................. ......... 1,011,827,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +4,727,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,011,827,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve. The total amount 

recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
101 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATIOIII AND MAINTENANCE, NAV'i RESERVE 

BUDGET ACTtVlTV 1: OPERATING FORCES 

RESERVE AIR OPEAATIONS 

10 MISSION AND OTHEI! FLIGHT OPERATIONS. 

20 lNTERMEOIIITE MlNTENftHCE. 

40 1\IRCRo\FT DEPOT MAINTE~ANCE 

SO AIRCRI\FT DEPOT OPERA TlONS SUPPORT. 

60 AVIATION LOGISTICS. 

RESERVE SHIP OPERATIONS 

70 MISSION liND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS. 

60 StUP OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AND TRJ.l~!NG. 

90 St11P DEPOT IIAINTENANCE. 

RESERVI' COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 

100 COMBAT COHHU~ICATIONS. 

110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES. 

RESERVE WEM>QNS SUPPORT 

120 WEAPONS Hol.l~TENANCE 

130 ENTERP~lSE INFORMATION 1£CHNOLOGY 

BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 

140 FACiliTIES SUSTAINMENT RESTORATION i MODERNIZATION 

1~0 eASE OPERATING SUPPORT 

TOTAL. BUDGET ACTJVITV 1 

BUDGET ACTlVITY 4: ADHHI & SERVICEWIOE ACTIVITIES 

AOIHNJSTRATION AWO SERVJCEWIOE ACTIVITIES 

160 AO'IINISTRATl0'-1 

170 lllliTARY f1AHPOWER & PERSONNEL. 

180 SERVICEWIDE CO'Iro!UNlCAfJOHS 

190 ACOUISJHON AND PROGRAM HANAGEJ1ENT 

TOTAL. IIUOGET ACTIVITY 4 

SUOGEJ CQMM!TTH CHA"'GE FROH 

REQUEST RECO'I~ENOED REQUEST 

565' 842 "' '" 5. 948 ... 82.636 62.636 

"' '" 7,007 1,007 

'" 6, 1'30 

"' "' 4,571 4,571 

14,47"2 14,412 

119,056 119,056 

1 '852 1 ,852 

" ,,. 25.354 

.. "' 53' 098 +4 B27 

'" . 921 101 '921 

986,029 990,656 t4 827 

1 ,520 1 ,520 

1"2 .996 " "' 3,395 3,395 

3,158 3.158 

" ,071 21 ,071 

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL COHPENSATION HIRING LAG ·100 -100 

TOTAL, OPERATION ANO f1AlHTENANCE, NAllY RESERVE,. 1,007,100 1 ,011 ,827 +4,727 
102 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thDUH.ndll ol dojlal'll) 

0-< Reu::ommended 

FACIUTIESSUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

BSMR MODERNIZATION 

Program lncreue 

CIVIUAJ<f PERSONNEL COMPENSATION HIRING LAG 

48,271 1!3,098 

4,827 

·100 

Cl\ange from 

, ....... 

4,U27 

'" 
103 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ............ ......................... $255,317,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .... ........................ ............... 268,582,000 

Committee recommendation ........... ........................... 270,485,000 

Change from budget request ................... . ............................. , + 1,903,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $270,485,000 for 

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2015: 
104 

(DOLLARS IN ntOUSMDS) 

BUDGET CO~HITTH OIANGE FROII 

REQUEST RECOI'I~EMOEO IIEQUEST 

OPERATION Ar.IO IIAINTENANCE, MARINE CO~PS RES~RVE 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES 

EXPEOITJONARV FORCES 

10 OPE~TlNG FORCES 93 '093 93' 093 

20 DEPOT MlNTENIINCE. 16 ,377 18,377 

40 FACtllTIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & !'IODERr.llZATIO~ " "' 32. 155 +2' 923 

50 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT. '" "' 106.447 

----------- TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 247,149 250.072 +2,923 

8UDGrT ACTIVITY 4. ADMIN & SERVICEWrDE ACTIVITIES 

ADIIINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

70 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATIDN ,. '" 80 ADIIINISTRATION. " .831 " "' 90 R~CRUJTING AND ADVERTISING 8,688 8,668 

TOTAL, SIJOGET .O.CTIVITY 4 21 ,433 21 ,433 

ClVlllAN PERSONNEL COMPENSATION HIRING LAG -1 ,()20 -1 ,()20 

TOTAL. OPEIIATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE. 268.582 270,485 +1 ,903 
0"' 

BSM1 

105 

EXPLANATION Of PROJECT LEIIEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thouaandlo of dQII&'*] 

Budget CommittH 

Ragueot Recommendl'd 

FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MOOERNIZATION n.232 32,155 

Prog111m oneraase 2,92:! 

CMLIAN PERSONNEL COMPENSATION HIRING LAG -1,020 

Cl>ongo from 

-

2,i1U 

-1,020 
106 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ...................... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,................. $3,062,207,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ....................... ............................ 3,015,842,000 

Committee recommendation ...... ............................ 2,989,214,000 

Change from budget request ................................. ........................ -26,628,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,989,214,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2015: 
107 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

OPERATION AND ltA!NTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. OPERATING FOlKES 

AIR OPERATIONS 

10 PRIMARY C01'1BAT FORCES. 

20 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS. 

JO DEPOT ltAINTENAHCE. 

40 FACILlTIES SUSTAlNI'IENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 

50 BASf OPERATING SUPF'ORT. 

TOTAl, SUOG[T ACTIVITY 1. 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADI'IIN & SERVICEWIDE M:T!VITIES 

A01'11N!ST~ATION AND SERVICEW!OE ACTIVITIES 

60 ADI'Ilii!SUATION. 

70 ~ECRUITING AND ADVERTISING. 

BO HlllTARY MANPOWE:R ~NO PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. 

90 QTMER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 

BUCGET CC»1~1TTEE CHANGE F~DI'1 

REQUEST RECOMEIIOED REQUEST 

1,719,467 1,709,067 . 10,400 

211.132 208' 332 -2,800 

530,301 530. 301 

85.612 94' 239 <-8,S67 

367' 966 355' 839 -12,127 

----------- 2,914,538 897' 778 ·16' 760 

59.899 57,596 ·2 .303 

14.509 14.044 -485 

20.345 20,345 

6, 551 6.551 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4. -2,768 '"' '" 99.536 

OVERESTlltATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TI\RGe'TS. ·1' 100 ·7.100 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MINTENA~CE.. AIR FORCE RESERVE 3.015.642 2.989,214 ·26.626 
108 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thouaanda of doll1r11) 

Budgtl Committee 

R!Ciutlll Recommended 

011A PRIMARY COMB"T FORCES 

Juat~icallon c1oes not ma.«::ll summary ol price and 

program changes lor ctv;tian person net eompensahon 

011G MISSION SUPPORT OPERAOONS 

Justll!cation cloe:<~ not match $Ummary ol price and 

program change a lor civilian l)l:lri!Onnel eompensallon 

011R FACIUTIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION a MODERNIZATION 

Program Increase 

1111Z BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 

Unjustified progF.~m growth 

Inactive Duty Training Lodging· unjus1iliao' program 

growlh 

042A AOMINISTRATION 

Unjuslifl~~Jd program growltl 

042J RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 

Uniuslifiad program growth 

OVERESTIMATION Of CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS 

1,719,487 1,709,087 

-10,400 

211,132 208,332 

-2.800 

BU12 94,23& 

B.5e7 

36'1,966 355,8311 

·8,799 

-3.326 

59,899 57,5~ 

. ·2,303 

14,809 14,044 

·465 

•7,100 

Ch11nge from 

Rtoqt.l!!l 

·10,400 

·2,800 

8,ti67 

·12.127 

·2,3(13 

.... 

·1,100 
109 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation.......................................................... $6,857,530,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .... ................ 6,030,773,000 

Committee recommendation ................ ....................... 6,116,307,000 

Change from budget request ............. ........................................ +85,534,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,116,307,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2015: 
110 

(DOLLARS IN TKOUSA~DSI 

OPERATION AND ~AIIITEHANCE, ARHY NATION.-.L GUARD 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: Of'EI<ATHIG FORCES 

LIIND FORCES 

'0 I'!ANEUVER UNITS 

20 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES. 

30 EC~ELOHS ABOVE 8A!G,.DE 

40 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS,, 

50 LAND FORCES OPERA THINS SUPPORT. 

60 AVIATitm ASSETS 

LAND FORCES READ! NESS 

70 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 

BO lAND FORCES SYSTE~S READINESS 

90 LAND e·oACES DEPOT MAl ~TENANCE 

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT. 

110 FACILITIES SIJSTAINI'IENT, RESTORATIO~ & MODERNIZATION 

120 MAHAGEHENT AND OPERATIONAL hEADQUARTERS. 

TOTAl, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1. 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVIC~WIOE ACHV!T!ES 

ADMINISTRATION AAO SERVICEWIOE ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVI CEWI DE TRANSPORTATION 

150 ADI'IlNISTRI\TION. 

160 SERVICEWIOE CO~HUNICATIONS 

1 ?0 "'ANPQW€R MANAGEMENT. 

ISO RECRUITING A~O ADVERTISING 

140 REAL ESTATE 11ANAGEHENT. 

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 

UNJUST!nEO GROWTH FOR CJVILTAI< PERSONI<EL COI'1PENSATION 

COI'!BAT TRAU<ING CENTER ROTATIONS. 

RESTORE READINESS. 

TOTAL. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE. ARI\1' NATIONAL GUARD. 

BUDGET COI\ti!TTEE CHANGE FROH 

REQUEST RECOIIHENDED REQUEST 

660,6-48 

165,942 

7J3,800 

83.084 

22' 005 

920' 085 

660.867 

69 126 

138 263 

eo~ 517 

490 205 

672 140 

5,641.302 

6. 690 

37.372 

11,48~ 

274.085 

1. 765 

389 411 

6,030, 773 

660,648 

165,942 

733. BOO 

83' 084 

22,005 

920. 08!1 

680' 887 

68.552 

138,263 

787 '353 

539.226 

846.243 

5,646.088 

6, 690 

63.075 

37.372 

1 .197 

270' 823 

1. 765 

380,922 

.J. 703 

23' 000 

70,000 

6.116.307 

·11' 184 

•49.021 

·25,897 

+4' 786 

·S. 287 

.J. 262 

·8,549 

+23.000 

+85' 534 
111 

EXPL-'NATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

{In lhounrtd11 of doUa.-.) 

0·1 

122 LAND I'OFICES SYSTEMS REAOfNESS 

Juslliil::a11on does not match summary of price and 

program changes lor prlnllng and reproduction 

131 eASE OPERATION$ SUPPORT 

Remove on&·time fiscal y&ar 2014 funding increase 

Jus!Hicatlol1 does not match summery ot prrce and 

program changes lor travel 

132 FACILinES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZAnON 

Program oi'!Crease 

133 MANAOEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 

Justrlicatiol1 does not matcn summary ol price and 

program changlt& for ciYlhan par5oonel compensation 

433 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 

Offu:e olthe Deputy Ctliel of Staff· unjust•liOO program 

growth 

Suppli&s BJ1d male rialS· unjustiflecl program grO\'IIh 

434 RECRUmNG AND ADVERTISING 

M!lrk$ting al'ld Adven1slng programs · unjuslll!9d 

program growth 

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL COMPENSATION· 

UNJUSTIFIED PROGRAM GROWTH 

FULLY FUND TWO COMBAT TRAINING CENTER 

ROTATIONS· ARMY REQUESTED TRANSFER FROM 

OM,A SAG 121 

RESTOflE READINESS 

69,72t 

804,517 

1172,140 

.... 

214,045 

CQmmlttlltl 

Rt<:ommendea 

68.552 

-1.174 

7$7,353 

-10,000 

·7,164 

G39,226 

49,021 

846,243 

1,191 

·131 

-5.156 

270.823 

·3.262 

-3,703 

'"'" 

70,000 

·1,174 

·17,164 

·2!,887 

·5,287 

-3,262 

-3,703 

23,000 

70,000 
112 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ............. , ........................................... $6,392,304,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ..... ................ ................... 6,392,859,000 

Committee recommendation ................ ............... ................... 6,393,919,000 

Change from budget request ................... +1,060,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,393,919,000 

for Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2015: 
113 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSAND$) 

BUDGET COMI'HTTEE CHANGE FROit 

!!(QUEST RECOiti'IENOEO REQUEST ........... 

OPERATION AND 1\Al NTE"'ANCE, AIR NATIOJ.!AL GUARD 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 : OPERATING FORCES 

AIR OPERAT!ONS 

" AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS. 3,367,729 3,366,229 ·1 ,500 

" ltJSSION SUPPORT OPERAT[ONS. 716,295 707,095 . , 1 ,200 

" DEPOT IIAINTENANCE. 1,526.895 1,528,695 

" FACllrTIES SUSTAINKENT, RESTORATION & IIODERNIZATION 137,804 151 ,384 +\3, 760 

50 !lASE OPERATlN~ SUPPORT 581 .5~ 581,536 

TOTAL, BUDGH ACTIVI"N 1 6,333,859 6,334,919 +1 ,080 

Bl10GET ACTIVITY 4: A0111N & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

SERVICEWJCE ACTIVITIES 

60 ADitUilSTRATION .27,812 27,812 

" RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 31' 188 31 '188 

TOTAL. BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 S9, 000 59' 000 

~:::: ;::= .. ~-- .. ~~-~ ~~""'"~- ..... ,.~n•••u 

lOTAL. OHRAHON & MArNT£NANCE, ATR NATIONAL GUARD 6,392,859 6.393.919 +1 ,OBD 
114 

EXPl.ANATlON OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thouenda of doll11n1] 

0·1 

D1 1F AIRCRAfT OPEFIATIONS 

Budg&ljustof•catian doea not mak;h summary at pnca 

alld program chang~!!~ lor tlying hour program 

(111G MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 

Budget jusl~icatkJn does not match summary ol ~rice 

and program changes lor ciVihan personnel 

compens~tion 

011R FACILlTIES SUSTot.INMENT, RESTOMTION & 

MODERNIZATION 

Program Increase 

!11,387,729 

718,2:95 

137,604 

Committee 

Recommerlded 

-I ,500 

707,09!5 

-11,200 

1!1,364 

13,760 

Cn.nge lrom 

R'9"''" 

-1,$00 

·11.200 

13,760 
115 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER 

ACCOUNT 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ........................ . ............... . 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ... .................... $5,000,000 

Committee recommendation . . ............. . 

Change from budget request . -5,000,000 

The Committee recommends no funding for the Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Account. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED 

FORCES 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation . 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request , 

Committee recommendation .............................................. . 

Change from budget request .................. . 

$13,606,000 

13,723,000 

13,723,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $13,723,000 for 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ... .. ............................ . 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .................................................... . 

Committee recommendation ..... .................... . ........................ . 

Change from budget request ...... .. ............................................ . 

$298,815,000 

201,560,000 

201,560,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $201,560,000 for 

Environmental Restoration, Army. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ........................... . 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .................................................... .. 

Committee recommendation .......................................................... .. 

Change from budget request ....................................................... . 

$316,103,000 

277,294,000 

277,294,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $277,294,000 for 

Environmental Restoration, Navy. 

VIEQUES AND CULEBRA ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 

The Committee remains concerned about the pace of environmental restoration on the islands of Vieques and Culebra. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Navy, in coordination with the Secretary of the Army, to submit a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 60 days after the enactment of this Act detailing a plan and schedule for the completion of the clean-up of the contaminated areas of Vieques and 

Culebra. 

The Committee also notes that there are gaps in information 

about the types and amounts of ordnance used on Vieques and 

Culebra and potential links between such ordnance and present 

threats to public health. The Committee further directs the Secretary of the Navy, in coordination with the Secretary of the Army, 

to submit a report to the congressional defense committees not 

later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act that details the 

types of weapons deployed on these islands, as well as the estimated level of use of these types of ordnance at these two sites. Fi-
116 

nally, the Committee also urges the Secretary of Defense to make 

the relevant documents available to the public. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ...................... .. ...................... . Fiscal year 2015 budget request ...................................................... . Committee recommendation ............................................................. . Change from budget request ........................................ . 

$439,820,000 

408,716,000 

408,716,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $408,716,000 for 

Environmental Restoration, Air Force. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-WIDE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ....................................................... . Fiscal year 2015 budget request ................................. . 

Committee recommendation .................................................. , Change from budget request ........................ . 

$10,757,000 

8,547,000 

8,547,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $8,54 7,000 for 

Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, FORMERLY USED 

DEFENSE SITES 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation........................................ $287,443,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .. ........................ 208,353,000 

Committee recommendation ............................. 233,353,000 

Change from budget request +25,000,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $233,353,000 for 

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites. 

ENVJRO:;MENTAL RESTORATION ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS 

The Committee believes that improved oversight and management of the Department of Defense Environmental Restoration programs will yield continued benefits. The Committee awaits the 

completion and release of the Defense Environmental Program's 

Annual Report to Congress and looks forward to receiving and reviewing the report and the additional data required by the Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014. The Committee reminds the Secretary of Defense that the additional reporting requirements should be considered an ongoing annual requirement. 

OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .... ................ .... . .. . ........... $109,500,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request 100,000,000 

Committee recommendation ......................... ..................... 103,000,000 

Change from budget request .................... ............................ +3,000,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $103,000,000 for 

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid. 

HUMANITARIAN MINE ACTION PROGRAM 

Explosive remnants of war such as mines, unexploded ordnance, 

and small arms ammunition disrupt innocent civilian populations 

in unimaginable ways, including maiming, disfiguring, and possibly 

causing death. The Humanitarian Mine Action (HMA) program 

provides training and readiness-enhancing benefits to military 
117 

forces. The HMA program aids in the development skills for host 

country personnel to sustain their mine action programs after mili· 

tary trainers have redeployed. To enhance the effectiveness of this 

J?rogram, the Committee recommendation provides an increase of 

$3,000,000. 

COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ..................... . .............. .. Fiscal year 2015 budget request ..................................................... . 

Committee recommendation ...................... . Change from budget request ................................. . 

$500,455,000 

365,108,000 

365,108,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $365,108,000 for 

the Cooperative Threat Reduction Acco~n!!_t:.. -------------JI.! 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE 

DEVELOPMENT FUND 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ................. ................... $51,031,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .............. 212,875,000 

Committee recommendation .................................................... 51,875,000 

Change from budget request . ~ 161,000,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $51,875,000 for 

the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 
~~~ 

ASSISTANCE TO UKRAINE 

The Committee recognizes that the Department of Defense has been 

involved with assisting the people of Ukraine through funding provided in the 

Cooperative Threat Reduction Account. Additionally, the Committee notes the 

continued suffering of the Ukrainian people. The Committee therefore directs the 

/ 

1 /l 

I Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense committees 

not later than 60 days after the enactment of this Act describing additional 

assistance that the Deprutment may provide to Ukraine. 

TITLE III 

PROCUREMENT 

The fiscal year 2015 Department of Defense procurement budget 

request totals $89,660,299,000. The Committee recommendation 

provides $91,227,819,000 for the procurement accounts. The table 

below summarizes the Committee recommendations: 

(119) 
AIRCRAFT 

I!JSSJLES. 

SUI!I!ARY 

ARMY 

WEAPONS, TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES. 

AM HUH I Tl ON. 

OTHER 

TOTAL, ARMY 

AIRCRAFT. 

.,_EAPONS. 

AI'!HUNITlOH. 

SHIPS. 

OTHER. 

MAR! NE CO liPS .. 

TOTAL, NAVY .. 

AIRCRAFT. 

HJSSJL~S. 

o\HHUNIT!ON. 

OTHER 

TOTAL, AIR FORCE. 

DEFENSE-WI DE, 

NAVY 

AIR FORCE 

OEFEHSE·WIDE 

DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES. 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT 

120 

iOOLL"'RS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHA.NGE FRO'! 

REQUEST RECOKHENOED JI:EQUEST 

5,102,685 

1.017,483 

1,471,438 

1 ,031 '417 

4, 893 "' 

13,516 "' 

13,074,317 

3,217.945 

771 '945 

14,400,825 

5,975,828 

983.352 

30, 424,012 

11.~42,571 

4,590,506 

877,400 

" 566.016 

33 476,495 

4' 221 '437 

21.638 

5,295,957 

1. 217 

1. 703, "' 736 

1 '011 '477 

4' 8\2 234 

14,040 '" 

1A,054.523 

3,111 '931 

829,372 

14 256,361 

' 923,379 

927' 232 

------------

38 '902' 799 

12,046,941 

4,548,211 

648.200 

16,633,023 

33,874,375 

4,359,121 

51 ,638 

+193,272 

+200,000 

+232' 298 

-:.!0,000 

-81 ,400 

------------ +524,170 

1'980.206 

-106,014 

·142,573 

-1A4.284 

-52,449 

-56' 120 

+479 ,786 

+504 

-144 "' "' _,. 200 

•87 005 

<397 '880 

+136' 684 

+30.000 

89,660,299 91,227,819 +1,567,520 
121 

SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS 

Items for which additional funds have been provided or items for 

which funding has been reduced as shown in the project level tables or in paragraphs using the phrase "only for" or ''only to" in the 

Committee report are congressional interest items for the purpose 

of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of these 

items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated amount 

specifically addressed in the Committee report. Below threshold 

reprogrammings may not be used to either restore or reduce funding from congressional interest items as identified on the DD Form 

1414. These items remain special interest items whether or not 

they are repeated in a subsequent conference report. 

REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR ACQUISITION ACCOUNTS 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to continue to 

follow the reprogramming guidance as specified in the report accompanying the House version of the fiscal year 2008 Department 

of Defense Appropriations Act (House Report 110-279). Specifically, 

the dollar threshold for reprogramming funds will remain at 

$20,000,000 for procurement and $10,000,000 for research, development, test and evaluation. 

The Secretary shall continue to follow the limitation that prior 

approval reprogrammings are set at either the specified dollar 

threshold or 20 percent of the procurement or research, development, test and evaluation line, whichever is Jess. These thresholds 

are cumulative from the base for reprogramming value as modified 

by any adjustments. Therefore, if the combined value of transfers 

into or out of a procurement (P-1) or research, development, test 

and evaluation (R-1) line exceeds the identified threshold, the Secretary of Defense must submit a prior approval reprogramming to 

the congressional defense committees. In addition, guidelines on 

the application of prior approval reprogramming procedures for 

congressional special interest items are established elsewhere in 

this report. 

REPROGRAMMING REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 

The Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to continue to provide the congressional defense committees 

quarterly, spreadsheet-based DD Form 1416 reports for Service 

and defense-wide accounts in titles III and IV of this Act as required in the explanatory statement accompanying the Department 

of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2006. 

FUNDING INCREASES 

The Committee directs that the funding increases outlined in 

these tables shall be provided only for the specific purposes indicated in the tables. 

CLASSIFIED ANNEX 

Adjustments to the classified programs are addressed in a classified annex accompanying this report. 
122 

HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR 

The Committee recognizes the versatility and broad application 

that the High Mobility Engineer Excavator (HMEE) provides for 

the military. The HMEE offers full spectrum capability to accomplish standard engineer missions of survivability, mobility and 

counter-mobility, and the expanded mission of route clearance and 

breaching operations. The HMEE is transportable by C-130 and 

C-17 aircraft and is capable of operating at speeds of 60 miles per 

hour. It is a versatile engineer vehicle for expeditionary forces and 

for homeland support missions. The Committee urges the Service 

Secretaries to thoroughly review requirements for this vehicle for 

tactical operations as well as for National Guard dual use applications. 

TACTICAL POWER SOURCES 

Generators used by the Army and Marine Corps consume a large 

percentage of the fuel used in Mghanistan. The Committee is 

aware of the commitment by the Department of Defense to increase 

fuel efficiency and reduce costs. The Committee understands that 

the advanced medium power source generators may be more fuel 

efficient, reliable, lighter, and quieter than legacy tactical generators. The Committee commends the Army and the Marine Corps for 

pursuing advanced technology in the generation of tactical electricity. The Committee encourages the Secretaries of the Army and 

the Navy to continue to seek advances in tactical electric power. 

MOBILE USER OBJECTIVE SYSTEM TERMINALS 

The synchronization of ground terminals with the launch of satellites is a constant challenge for satellite communication systems. 

If the Department of Defense relies entirely upon acquisition of 

new terminals for the Mobile User Objective System (MUOS), the 

Department may not take advantage of the increased capability the 

MUOS constellation provides. The Committee supports the MUOS 

program and encourages the Secretary of Defense to consider the 

upgrade of existing communications terminals to accelerate the 

fielding of full MUOS capability to as many users as possible. 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation................................... $4,844,891,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request . ............................................ 5,102,685,000 

Committee recommendation ....................... 5,295,957,000 

Change from budget request ............................................... , +193,272,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $5,295,957,000 

for Aircraft Procurement, Army. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
MRCRAfT PlroCUREHEHT, AMY 

AI~AAFT 

~IXED WING 

UTIUTY F'!ll CARGO .oi.IRCRAFT 

A€~1A!. CQHNQ~ SEHSOR (ACS) (HIP] 

H0-1 UAV • 

R0-11 (IVoVEHl 

~OTARY 

HEL!COPHft, LIGHT UTJLJTY (LUH) 

A~-64 APACHE BLOCK lilA RfHAN. 

AH-64 .O.PAC~E 8Ltx:K IliA ~f~AN (~P-CY) 

" UH-60 BlACKHAWK (H~P) 

" UH-60 SlACKHI>MIC (H.,.,.) (AP-CY) 

" CN-41 HEUGOPHR 

" CH 41 HEUCOPTER JAP-C~). 

TOTAL. ~!RCR.O.FT 

HOOIF!C,TIOH (IF AIRCRAFT 

" H(l-1 PAYLOAO • UAS 

" GUARDRAIL NOO$ (MTP) 

" HUlTl SENSOR A8N RECON !HIP) 

" ~~·6• HOOS 

" CH ·•1 ~ARGO HEL!COPT£A HODS 

" ~TILITVIC~RCO Al~PU~E HOO$ 

" UTILITY HEliCOPTER HODS .. 

" Nfll/OIIK AND ~!SSIOH Pl.AN 

" CD~H$, IU.V $URl/EllLANC£ 

" G~ TH ROLLIJI' 

'" RD·7 U~V HODS 

TOTAL, HOOJFICAHO~ OF AIRCA.o.FT 

123 

(DOL~A~S IH T~OOSANOS) 

BIJOOET 

REOUEST 

QTY ~HOLII'IT 

13,017 

" 135.090 

.. 190' ~81 

1.964 

" 41G.6H 

" ~~~.00& 

U1,338 

" 1.231.001 

13~.138 

" 892,,0( 

102,361 

3.625.220 

25.&13 

lt,1!2 

q1,892 

IB1 ,8!9 

J2,092 

15.029 

78,515 

114.182 

115. 7G5 

54,277 

125.380 

888.126 

COMHinEE 

RECOHHE~DEO 

OTY """UHl 

IJ,GH 

" tlB.sgo 

" 2J&.5Bl 

3.964 

" ~16.611 

" 5n,oo9 

167.336 

"' 1,356.227 

132,138 

" O~l, 504 

102,JG1 

4.025,046 

20,913 

14,182 

131,89Z 

181,869 

Ji!,092 

~~ ,029 

H,5t5 

114.182 

115. Yi5 

54,277 

125.380 

ue.12e 

CH~NG£ FROH 

REQUEST QTY MOU~T 

·5 .(6,400 

H~.ooo 

•3 •79,000 

•8 •119.226 
SUP'PO!lT EOIJlP"EHT A~O <ACJL!TlES 

GROUIIO SUPPUIIT AVJONJCS 

" A!RCRAf7 SURVh'AB]llTV EOUJPMENT. 

;o SURVIV~BIL!TY C~ 

" C~\oiS. 

OHlER SUPPOHl 

" A~lOMlCS SUPI'ORT EOUJPMEMl 

" COIII!Oiol G~OlmD EQUIPMENT 

,. ~!IICRE._, lMHGRATED SYSTEMS,. 

" AIR TRAH!~ CONTROL 

" l~DUST~J.O.L FACILITIES .. 

" LAUNCHER :! n ROCKH .. 

TOTAL, SUPPORT £0\Jir>HENT AND fAC!llTHS., 

TOTAL, Al~IV.Ff PROC\IRE"ENT. MIIY 

124 

(001 lARS IN PtOUSAM:IS) 

BOOGET COH~ITTEE 

HEQUE5T Mi::CON"EIIOEO 

QTY ~~OUMT OTV ANOU~I 

65 45(1 v~ .059 

7 ,BOO 

107 364 eo,4ol 

6,647 &.947 

~g' 231 29.231 

'1,061 48,081 

12?.1Jl 127,132 

'.20~ 1 ,203 

"' 2.9J1 "' 2.931 

~6V.J39 382.785 

5,101.6~5 5 2~~-~57 

C~.o.IIGE f!ION 

~EOUEST 

QTY MOUH 

~32.1>09 

•7 .aoc 

-46.~63 

-&.M• 

+!93.272 

n~•••n•o•• ••••••••••~~n•••••• 
125 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thounnd1 of dolla~] 

P-1 

AERIAL COMMON SENSOR 

Fur'ld1ng ahead of need 

MQ-1 UAV 

PI"O{lram fncrease- Improved Gray Eagle with extended 

range 

7 AH-54 APACHE BLOCK lilA REMAN 

Program it'ICrease 

12 UH-60 BlACKHAWK (MYP) 

Program increa&e ortly lor tt>e Arrrr; National Guard 

SOC OM- Qperationalloss replacement 

29 AIRCRAF1" SURV!VABILITY EQUIPMENT 

Army req~.~ested transfer from line 31 

30 SURVIVABJLITYICOUNTER MEASURES 

Army requested transfer from ~ne 31 

31 COMMON MISSILE WARNING SYSTEM 

Army requasted translet to line 30 

Army r,que$1ed !lansfer to line 29 

Excess lc need 

Budgtt 

Requnt 

185,090 

190,581 

494.009 

1,%37,otJ1 

66,450 

107,364 

Committee 

Recomm~:~nded 

138,69(1 

.<16,400 

239,581 

49,000 

572,009 

78,000 

1,356,227 

11)3,026 

16.200 

99,0S9 

32,609 

7,800 

7,800 

80,401 

-7,600 

-32,1!09 

-6,554 

Change rrom 

........ 

-46,400 

49,000 

78,000 

119,226 

32.609 

7,800 

-46,963 
126 

ARMY AVIATION RESTRUCTURE INITIATIVE 

The Army's fiscal year 2015 budget request proposes a significant 

restructuring of Army aviation assets. Part of this proposal is to 

transfer all Apache helicopters from Army National Guard units to 

the active Army and to shift Blackhawk helicopters from the active 

Army to the Army National Guard. Another component of the proposal is to retire the Kiowa Warrior helicopter, including the TH67 helicopter, currently being used as the training platform for 

Army aviation. The Committee understands that the Army made 

this proposal primarily for affordability reasons. The Committee 

approves the proposal, with the exception of the transfer of Apache 

aircraft from the Army National Guard, as discussed in title VIII 

of this Act. With respect to the retirement of TH-67 aircraft, the 

Committee is extremely concerned about the impact on the rotary 

wing industrial base of placing such a large amount of excess airframes on the market. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense 

committees not later than 120 days after the enactment of this Act 

on the aircraft being retired as part of the Army proposal. This report should include the number of airframes being divested, the 

number of airframes being transferred to other government agencies, the number of airframes being offered for sale to other nations, the cost of divesting these aircraft, and the impact the divestiture of these airframes will have on the domestic rotary wing industrial base. Further, the Secretary of the Army is prohibited 

from divesting any aircraft until the report is submitted by the Secretary of Defense. 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .............. ....................... $1,549,491,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request . ........................ 1,017,483,000 

Committee recommendation .............................................................. 1,217,483,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +200,000,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,217,483,000 

for Missile Procurement, Army. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
~1551LE PI!OI:UREMENT J\RHY 

Ol~ER H:SSILES 

SURF.O.CE·TO·AIR MISSILE SYSTtM 

LOWER T:£R AIR ANO MIS$1lE OErEMSE (MDI 

NSF MJSSIU. 

HELLFI~E SYS SU~HA~V _. 

.O.HTI-TAN!UASSAULT MISSILE SYSTEM 

jJIV£LlH (AA~S-~) SlSlEH SUMMARY 

TOll 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY 

10\< 2 nSICH Si!~MHY (~P-CY) 

CUIOEO HLRS ROC~ET (~LAS! 

HLRS REilll,ED RANGE PRACTICE ROCXnS (F!f!PRI 

TOTAl, OTHER ~ISS! I ES 

HOiliFI::ATION OF MISSILES 

HOOIFICATIONS 

" PATRIOT HODS 

" SJL~R HODS 

" AVE~R HODS 

" rT.O.SITOW MDS .• 

" ML~$ /\ODS 

" Hl~ARS ~ODIFlCI,TIOHS 

TOTAL "ODlFlCAHO~ OF ~l!JSllES 

5PA~ES AND ~EPAlR PARTS 

" SPARES AND R!PA!R PAHTS. 

SUP!'O~T EOU1~~ENT A~O F~C!L!TJU 

.. AIR OEFENS[ TAAGHS 

" !H~S lESS T~AN $5 .0~ (HlSSJLE5) 

" PRCOOCT!ON BAS! SUPPORT 

WTAl SUPPO~I tOUJP~t~l ANO FArlUTIE5 .. 

TOT Ill. HISSILE PROCURnFH, ltRHY 

127 

{l'lOI.LA~S I~ T~OUSJoNOS) 

SUOOH COnnlTTH 

MEOUEST REC~MEHOEO 

OIY ~HDUNl OTY AMOUNT 

110.300 110,:WO 

" 3U.60S " 532.605 

4.452 4,452 

"' H ~&<! "' 71' ~6& 

1 .009 50.3SS ""' 50.368 

19,984 19,984 

'" 1H.H5 "' 127,1H 

2,994 ~1.274 2.994 21,U4 

795.796 94~' 7\ltl 

13!.33B 183.838 

1,155 1,355 

5,811 5,811 

1~,076 1g.a1a 

10.380 10,380 

6.008 6,00! 

IH.UO ?26,888 

36.930 36.930 

3.6H 3.657 

1 ,522 1,522 

4, 710 4,110 

8.889 9.68~ 

1,017,483 ,217,483 

CH.o.'ICE ~~0~ 

UQUEST 

QTY ~~OUHT 

., •U8 000 

•148 000 

•52.000 

•~2 .OliO 

·~oo.ouo 

~•~••••n .. • •••••••••••••~•<>•~• 
P·1 

MSE MISSILE 

Program rncrBase 

, PATRIOT MOOS 

Program increase· 

128 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In lhoosands of doll all!) 

Bud !lei Commlt\ae 

Requesl Recommended 

384,605 UZ,605 

'"e.ooo 

131,838 183,&38 

radar dig~al proceasors "·"" 

Change from 

Ftequnt 

148,000 

52,000 
129 

PROCUREMENT OF WEAPONS AND TRACKED COMBAT 

VEHICLES, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .............................................. $1,610,811,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .................... ............................... 1,471,438,000 

Committee recommendation .................... 1,703,736,000 

Change from budget request ............................................................. +232,298,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,703,736,000 

for Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army, 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
130 

IDOl' ARS I~ THn~~AIIOSI 

BUDGn COHHITHE CHA"Gl H!On 

R!:lli.IE&T RtCOHHENOEO RfDUIEST 

'" AMOUNT "" A~U~T on AHOUWT 

······································· 

PROCL'REHE~T OF W~TC\1. ARHY 

TRACKED COHBAT VEHICLES 

5T~~ER ~!:~TCLE J65.1 \(I ·J~, 110 ·~o.O<lo 

HODIFICATIO~ o;: TR'-C~ED COMBAT VEHICLES 

STI!Y~ER 1,11001 ~i.S8~ 39.683 

fiST VEHICLE (HOOI Z6.159 ~6 .159 

BRADLEY ~OGRM (Hot! I 101.5<JB 10/,SOS 

~OWITZER. H€0 SP H \5~HH HI 09A6 :noo1 4~ 411 ·~ ,411 

PALAIH~ PIPn '100 IH SfRV!Cf " -~7.400 " 247,400 

IHPROVEO "'-COYE~Y VEHICLE (n8BA~ HEftCUL~S). " 50.451 .. 122.451 .,. •72,000 

ASS.OULT BRIOG~ (1100) 2.413 2.473 

ARHOREO BREACHER VEHICCE 36.563 36, &83 

'" M6 FO'O HODS 1 _g)5 1.975 

" JOI~T MSAULT BRII'IGE 4Q,46l •;,462 

" n1 AIIAAHS !A~ (1100) 2H.on 731,023 

" ABRAM UPGR.ID£ f>ROGRAA. 120.000 +120.000 

SIJPPOf!T fCUIP~fNT MD FACILITIES 

" PROOUCTI(l!l BAS( SUPI'ORl (TC~-WTCV). ~.H8 G.~T6 

TOTAL. T~AC~EO COIII\.O.T VEHTCH5. 1.236. 31 ~ I ,'16.JH ·2~2,000 

WfA"<l"S ~"D 0TI1f~ C(lHBAT V~HICLES 

" !IO~TAR SYSTf"S ~ ,012 5.0H 

H X~l20 GREHME LAUHC~E~ 'IODUlE (GL~) 8.959 2~ ,390 a.gsg 28,3~ 

'" COHP~~~ StHl·AUTOMIJC SHIPH SVSTE~ "' "' ,. C~~BlNE .. ~8.~J4 29,366 -~.608 20,616 _,, .428 ·8.150 

" COMON RE~OHLY OPERAT€0 HEAPOHS STATI<»>. a.~~~ 8.~09 

" H.NDGUN 4,811 3.957 4. 811 J.9~1 
MOD OF W!AffiNS AND OTMH COMBAT VEH ,. MIH MOD~ 

" N4 CARBUE MOS 

" ~2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MOOS 

" N249 SAW MACHINE GUN 1\GOS 

" M240 MEDIUM MACHINE Glm MOOS. 

" SNJPH Rll'lES MOOIF!CAT!ONS 

" ~119 MODJFJC~T!O~S 

,, M16 ~I Fl[ 1'005 

" IIO!lTAA MOOIFIC.O.TION .. 

" HOOlf!CATIONS !.ES,S TIIA/<j H OH (lo'()CV·WTC\11 

SUPPORT EDUJPHUT AND FACIUTIES 

" ITEMS lfSS THMI $5 011 {lo'OCV·'•Hr.V) 

, PIWD\JCTION B.O.SE SUPPO~T (WOCY-WTCV). 

" INDUSTRIAL PREPAREO~!oSS. 

" SHALL A~S EOUJPII[NT (SOLDIER i:NH PRO<;) 

TOTAL, Wl:APOHS MD OniER COIIai\T VEHICLES 

lCTAL, PROCl!~Eft!~l Dr N!fC~. A~HY .. 

131 

(IIOLLA~S IN T•mUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REOOEST 

QTY '-"0\I~T 

15, 1~6 

J,446 

~5,2~6 

~- 546 

4.6J5 

4 019 

12,716 

1.952 

8.~03 

2,089 

2.005 

!.911 

"' 

1,552 

2!&, 124 

411 .~38 

COIIMinEE 

RECOIIHfNOE~ 

OTI" AMOUNT 

1a. •as 

6,445 

25,295 

5,546 

2,83& 

4.0H 

12 Jl e 

a,go3 

2.0~9 

1,005 

8,911 

,,. 

1,~82 

0!25.~22 

70l,n6 

CJUNC,~ ~RO" 

REQUEST 

QTV »OUNT 

•3,000 

-2.000 

-1 '9~2 

·9. 702 

+232. Z96 ••••••••n•• nn••n•OUOOOOOO*• 
132 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT Le\IEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thoutand~ or doll•raJ 

Com'l!ltlee 

P·1 

Budgei 

Request Rea om mended 

1 STRYKER VEHICLE 

Unlunded requirement- fourth OVH brigade set 

IMPROVED RECOVERY veHICLE (MBBA2 HERCULES) 

Program Increase 

13 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM 

Program Increase 

1$ CARBINE 

Army requusled trans far to RDTE,A line 86 

Army requested transfer to RDTI:.'.A line 70 

25 M4 CARBINE MODS 

Army requested transfer !rom line 31 

Army requestltd transfer from l1ne 28 

28 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MOOS 

Arrr-y reqo..ested tran~fer to ~ne 25 

31 M16 RIFLE MOOS 

Army requested lr!lnsfer to RDTE.A l1ne 70 

'""1Y ri!{1U<:"SlM transfer to line 25 

335,110 435,110 

50,000 

50,451 122,451 

72.000 

120,000 

120.000 

29,366 20,$16 

-6,702 

-2,048 

3,446 6 .... 6 

1,000 

2,000 

4,635 2,6J5 

-2.000 

1,952 

-95~ 

-1,000 

Cha11ge from 

R•qu"t 

!0,000 

72,000 

120,000 

-8,7M 

'·"' 

-2,[100 

-1,8112 
133 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation.... ................. $1,444,067,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .. .................................................... 1,031,477,000 

Committee recommendation . 1,011,477,000 

Change from budget request ................ -20,000,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,011,477,000 

for Procurement of Ammunition, Army. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
134 

( O!IU A~S IN THOUSANDS I 

AH~UNITJCN 

S~All/H~nlUH rM AMHI.Jl;JTI[)Ij 

CTG, 5.56HII. AU TYP€S 

en;, HANOG~N. All TYPES 

CTG, 50 CAL, All TYPES., 

CTG. 25H~ ~U T\'PES 

CTG. 30H~ ~Ll TYPES 

f!QRT~~ ~MHUNiliO~ 

60MM ~RT~R. AU TYPES 

10 81~~ fiORf~R. AU TYPES 

11 120M HO~TAA, ~Ll T\'PES 

TAN~ MHUN!11011 

12 CTG TMK >OSHM ~~D 120M~ ~ll. T'IPES 

ART!LlfHY A~H~lTll>N 

13 CTG, ~~TY 15Mlol AND 105HH· All TYPE'S 

14 MTJLLEIIY P~OJECTILE. ~~~HH. ~ll T\'PES 

1~ ARTllHRY PROPRLANTS, FUZE~ AND P~IHU~5. All TYP~$. 

ROCHTS 

U SHOUlOlR LAUNCH~O HUNITIOH5, All TYPE5 • 

:10 ROCKET, HYDRA 10, All TWES 

CTHE~ MHUNlTIOH 

21 OEHOliT!DN HUN!TlONS, All TYPtS .. 

22 GRENADES All TYPES .. 

23 SIGNAl$, All TYPU 

24 SlHULATO~S. ALL TYPES .. 

BUDGET COHHITYEE 

RECIIJEST ~COHHEK{)ED 

OT'" Af!QUNT QTV AIIOUNT 

J~,Q4J 

t2.H! ·~ ,418 

9.8~!.> 9.655 

29.104 2~,104 

6,181 

52,651 

4\,?42 41,7H 

42.433 

39.365 

101 .liDO 

3?' 155 ]7 .~55 

H .023 

'" "' 

,., "' :11,286 27,288 

22,899 

22, YSl n.1~1 

1,082 

1\,636 11 ,eJa 

Cf!AI!GE F~O~ 

R~OUEST 

OTi' MOU~T 

-20,000 
" 

" 

'" 

" 

'" 

" 

" 

" 

" 

~ISCEU,AIIEOUS 

AHIIl COIIPONENTS, All TYPE$ .. 

NON-llTHAl ~MUN!TJON, .O.LL TYPE5 

CAOIP.W AU TYPE:S 

IT~S LESS Tf!AH S5 HILLIO~ 

MPIIJNITION PECULIA~ EOUIPHENT. 

I'I~T !IESTINAIION IRANSPORTAl!ON (AHHO) 

CU)SEOVT Ll.l9ll1TIES. 

TOTAL, AH~UN!TlON . 

AHHUNIHON Pf!OOUCTIQN QASE SUPPO~T 

PR(lOUCT!ON BASE SUPPORT 

PRCVISJOW OF 11/0UST~IAL 'AClllllES 

135 

I~OUARS IN T~O\ISAMOS) 

GUOOH 

REQUEST 

OTY NOOU~T 

3,594 

S,430 

9.331 

14' 905 

14,349 

"' 

7&1, QOO 

148.092 

COHYEI/TlONAl HUNIT!ONS D~HlUTAR!UTlON, ALL .. 113.8~1 

AR~.S INITIATIVE 2.W4 

TOTAl. AHHUNITIOH PRODUCTION BJtSE SUPPORT 264,HT 

TOTAL, PROCUI!EHEHT OF AHHUNIT!OW. ;.RH¥,, 1,031,417 

COKHlnEE 

RECOKMEMDEO 

QTY MOUNT 

3.~94 

5.430 

8.337 

14,906 

14,349 

'" 

IH,OOO 

U8,0Q2 

113,691 

2,504 

254,417 

I ,011,477 

CHA~GE F~~ 

~EOUEST 

QTY AIIOU~T 

-20,000 

-20,000 

~•~••=•~•~•~ •n•..,•••••=-~---~-
136 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In 1ho..., .. nda of dona,.] 

ARTILL.ERV PROPELLANTS, FUZES ANC PRIMERS, ALL 

1& TYPES 

Funding ~hud of need 

Budget 

Re-q~t 

94,010 

Commlttfll 

Reo om mended 

74,010 

-20.000 

Change from 

Requeat 

-20,000 
137 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation . ................... $4,936,908,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request 4,893,634,000 

Committee recommendation ... 4,812,234,000 

Change from budget request . . ................ ........................... -81,400,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,812,234,000 

for Other Procurement, Army. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
138 

(DOllARS IH TfiOUSAHD!;) 

9UtiCET C~~lTTH CHI.~GE FIW~ 

REQUEST ROCO~"ENOED REQUEST 

"" ""OU"T on ANOOIIT "' ~MU"l 

OT~ER ~OCU!i:'ENENT A~"V 

T~CTICA~ AN~ SUPP<IRl VEHICLES 

T.O.CTICAL VEHICLES 

TACfiCAL TR.O.!LUSIOOLLY SET~- 7,987 7,987 

SfNlTI!A!l~RS, FLATBED: ''" ... FAHllY OF H~OIJH TACTICAL VEH (FHTV) so' 000 •50.000 

JOINT L!G~T T~CT!CAL VEHIClE "' 194.615 "' 164,615 

FlRETRiiCK5 I. ASSCX:I~TEO FlREFIGHTING EQOIPHE~ " 8.41~ " 8,415 

FMHY OF HEAYV TACTICAL VEHlCLES (FHTV) ... ~8 4:15 ... 7!,415 •50.~00 

PL5 ESP ... 69 26J ... 09' ~5J 

" TACTJCM WIIHUD VEH!Cl~ I'IIOTECT!O~ KITS m J~ n6 m J5,226 

" HOOTnCI,TlON OF IN SVC EQUIP ... " "' "' 6J. 113 " -6.000 

" ~1NE-~£STSTAH AHaUSH-PAO!ECTEO ~ODS u 731 ,. ,731 

MOM· T.O.CT!C.O.L VEHIClES 

.. H[h\IY ARKOR£0 SEDAN '" "' 

" PASSENGER CARRYl~G VEHJCUS " I J38 " 1.3J8 

,, OONTACTICAL VEHICLES. OTHER. " "' 11, IQ\ 

l(H~l. TACTICAl AHD SUPPORT V£HitltS .. ~55,eog s.r.ao9 +92.0~ 

COHMUNIC,\TJOMS AND ~lfCUONICS tOUTP!IENT 

COHM · JOINT t;:OHHUMICATJONS 

" WlN·T - GRO~O FORCES T.O.CTICAl NHWORK. \ ,?80 753,087 ... 664,0111 -1~11 -!i9.000 

" S!GNAL ~OOERNllHIOH PROORM .. 21.1$7 .. 21,\H 

" JOI~l INCIDENT SITE CD"~UN!CATl0N5 CAP.O.IIlt.TTV 1,1i15 7 .~15 

" JCSE ECU!PHENT [USRE0Cl»1). 5.440 5,440 

COHM • 9MHLlTE C(II1HUIHCATlONS 

" OEHNSC UITERJ>!Ii5E WIOEeANO SJITCOH SYSTEMS. " ltB.0~6 " 118,00~ 

,. TRA~SPO~TlSLE TACTIC~l CONMlwtl COHHUNICATIONS " 1l.~R9 " 1J,999 

" st!F TERM s.•H 6,49• 

" MAVSTAR GL08~L POSHIOIUNG SYSTE" (SPACE) 1.635 1.635 

" SMART· T I SHCE) 13,554 13.554 

" SCAMP (SPACE). H,U9 18,699 

" GLOML 6RDCST SVC · GPS. 2.M9 l ,849 
139 

(~OLLARS IN f~OUS..O.NCIS) 

BUD()<T ~011/I!TTEE CHANGE F~0/1 

~EOUEST RECI)IINUIPEO REQUEST 

"" MOUNT "" MOUNT = AH(II)NT 

COII/I - C3 3Y5TEI! 

COM • COMBAT C(II!IIUN!CATlONS 

" ENROUTE lllSS!(IN CON/lAND [fHC] 100 000 ~0. 000 -~0 .OIXl 

" JOINT UCHCAl ~AOIO $¥STEH 2.614 115 711 1,913 , 2~' 711 -781 -50.00C 

" HlO-rtH NET\ol(l~~~~G VEHICULAR AAOIO i~NV~) 9_6g2 4,6;2 -5.0DG 

" RAOIO TERMINAL ~U, MIPS lH(2) 

·~ 17,136 "" 11,136 

" AMC CRITICAL !HHS · OPA2 3.ae• U.0~9 J. 0~1 n.o~9 

" TRACTOR OESK 3.124 J, 124 

" SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT '" ... .. SOLOIU fNHAioiCEIIEWT P!IOORM CI)IIH!ELeCTROHICS . '" '" ., HCTICAL CO~/IUHIC.O.l!ONS ANO ~ROTECTIVE SYSHH .. . 8,344 l~.354 8,344 24,354 

., UHIFI~D COIIHAND SUIT~ 17,44~ 17,445 

" R-'010 JIIPROVED HF (COTS] F~HilY I .028 1 .02~ 

.. fAMILY Of liED C~ft fOil C0/1!1.1 CASUALTY CAAE "' 22,614 '" 22,614 

COH~ • INHlUGENCE CO~~ 

" 0 MITOHATIOH ARI;HlTECTURE I~!P]. I, 51~ 1 .~19 

" RESfi!VE !;~I~ ISO GPF EQUJPKENT '"' 11,H! '"' 12,478 

l~FOFIHATIOH SECU~ITY 

;o l~FO~HATION SVSTEH SECUR!TV PROO~AII ·!SSP. 2.11l 2,113 

" COHMUHJCA' IONS SECURITY (COtiS[C]. 2.150 S&.H8 2.150 89' 646 

CO~H · LONG ~AUL COHHUNICATIO~S 

" BASE SUPPORT COHHUN!CAT!ONS 28.913 29,~11 

COM- BASE COHHUHJCAT!ONS 

" JNFOROI~IIOH SYSTEMS 97.091 97.091 

" OEFE..SE ME$SACE SVSTfH JOH$) "' ,.. 

" E~EF!'GENCY MIIJ\GEHENT "'DERN!ZATION PRCG!IAH. ~- J~2 5.362 

" JNSMUATJQN INFC tNFFCASTRUCTURJ: "CD PROGRAM n,&e5 1;.;e5 
140 

(flO! I lUiS IN mDUS.6Ji!l$) 

SUOOH CO~~ITTEE CHANGE FROH 

R~IIUEST RECOHHENOEO iEQUEST 

ON A"OV~T '" ~H()I)NT m AHOU~T 

ELeCT EQUIP EUCT EQUIP • TACT \NT RU o,CT (T!~IU!o) 

" JHIC!9S-H (AJP) '" '" 

"' PROPHET GROUN!I (HIP) " ~'' ~95 " ~~.89~ 

" OC(;.S·A [HIP) ~.42J 128. <07 ? 4lJ 12H,~OI 

" JOJ~T UCTICAL GROl1

HD SH.TIO~ IJTAGS). 5. ~GB S,286 

" l~OJ,I,N (HlP). 12.614 12.614 

.. HOD OF 1~-S\IC EDUIP [lHTH SPf) [HIP) . 3.901 3,901 

" Cl HUHJNT AUTO R<PRllNG AND COLl[CHARCS)[HIP). "" r,Jn "" 1 ,JY2 

HfCT EQUIP • EUCTRO~IC HARFARE IEHJ .. LlGHTIOEIGH COUHHR MillAR 'IADAA . U.928 20 .32~ 

" AIR V!G!lAHCE (.0..\1) l.C>OO 7,000 

n COUHTERINTH llGE~ E: I SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES 1,285 1 .28S 

ELI'CT EI)IJJP TACTICAl SURY {TAC SU~I 

" SE~TINEL HODS "' H,J05 "' ~4.305 

" ~/GI<T \IISIOH DEVICES 9,700 160,901 9,100 !60,001 

" SIIALL TltCTlCAL OPTICAl RIFLE HOU~T£0 KL~F. 1.9~5 18,5:1~ 1.eJ~ 16.~20 

.. JNOl~ECT FIRE PROTECHON FAIHLV OF SYSTE~S "' 68.2&6 "' 58,296 

" ~~"I LV OF \IEAPON S!O~TS IFWS) '71~ 49.205 1,193 J~.20~ -~23 -15,000 

" MTILLERV ~CCIJAACY EQUIP. "' -.~96 "' 4,896 

" P~OFHH 3,\H 3, 115 

.. HOO OF I~·SVC EDUIP jf'IRI:FINOH RADAASl "· 186 4.1!8 

" JOlNT BATTlE OO~~AND • PLATfORH IJ6C·Pl. 2.6U &1 .!62 2.3~4 37,89< -288 ·10.000 

" JOINT EFnCTS TAilGtTI•~ SVSTE" (JHSl " U,460 " 17.45-0 

" ~00 OF IN-SERVICE EOUlPHE"T ILLDR) " 14.08~ " 14,085 

.. HORT.OR Fl ~E CONUOL SYSH~ "' 29,n•o '" 2~,040 

.. COUNTERFUE RADARS ,, 20i.OSO " 1$9,050 ., ·50,000 
141 

(OOLL.'.U I~ THOUS~MOS) 

ELECT EQUIP • TACHC,O.L C2 SYSTENS 

" 'IR£ SUPPORT CZ ~A~IlY, 

" AIR & NSl OEFE~SE PLA!j~!N~ & C'*TROL SYS tMD . 

" LIFE CYClE SOFTW.RE SUPPORT (LCSSJ 

.. "ElWR~ nANAGEIIE~T JNITIAL!U.1J(IN AND SHYJCE .. 

1~0 n~!dUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (HCS) 

'"' GlOBAL COHSAT SUPPORT SYSHH·ARIIY 

101 ;NTEGAATEO PERSONNH ANO PAV SYSHM-UIIY 

104 RECONI•IAISSP.NC€ A~D SURYEY!M6 Jm;nunENT SET 

E1.ECT EOIJ!P · /o.UTOMTJON 

105 AR~Y TAAINW~ 1\0otc~NIZAT!O"-

106 AUTO~AHD DATA PROCl'SSf"G FQUIPMENT 

107 GENERAL H'MD ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSHn 

106 HIG~ n~F CO"PUTl~G ~00 ~OOAAH 

110 U$fRVE COIIPOt/f~T AUTOMT!Ofj SYS (RC.O.S). 

H<CT EOUI~ - AUDIO VISUAL HS {.o.IVI 

111 JT[H~ USS THAA $~~ (5URVEY!HG EOU!Pn~HT) 

ELECT ~Q!JI~ SUPPORT 

1\J PROOUCTlDH BASE SUPPORT {C·E) 

Cl.O.SS!FHO PROG'VIH~ 

T~TAL. CMMUHICATJOH~ AND HECT~OHICS £0UIPHEHT . 

01HER SUPPORT ~QUJP"EMT 

CHEMICAL DEFfNSIVE EQU!PHENT 

\15 FA~ILY OF NON·LH~l ~WlPHEH (FNLE) 

118 ~ASE DEFENSE SVSTE"S (B0S). 

117 CB~H SOLDIER PROTECTlO~ 

8Rl0GlNG EOUIPHENI 

1111 T~CllCAL BRli>GlO/G 

120 TACTICAL BR1DG~. HOAT·RIBI!{IN. 

SUOO£T 

REOIJEST 

llfY MOUNT 

13.823 

27.174 

2.~08 

2\ 024 

. 3 ,14~ ~5.455 

11~.~00 

3~.970 

" 10., 13 

9,015 

155,2<3 

15.5111 

65.252 

17.&31 

" !,•31 

"' 3, 707 

J.2J9.J72 

'" 1.93Q 

1~.506 17.466 

5.44:! 

11 .013 

COM !liTHE 

RECOME~D£0 

OTY AIIOVIIT 

13.823 

27.374 

2 ,5Da 

21,524 

J, 748 g5.~55 

116.~00 

32.970 

" 10.113 

9,015 

,,~,223 

16,581 

65.252 

17.631 

" 5. ~37 

"' ).707 

2,990.372 

"' 1.930 

1(.5<15 11. 4tiB 

5.442 

11.013 

C~"GE F~OH 

REQUEST 

OTY A~UNT 

-24~.000 
142 

lOOUI.!IS TN T~I)U$1.1105) 

BIJOGH COMKITIEE CHANG~ F~ON 

REQI!EST I!ECOIIIIEIIDl'O RECUEST 

"' ~MOUNT m ·~~ ON MO\IIIl 

ENGINEER (NON·CONSTRIICTION) rOUlPIIENT 

1~1 GROIJND STANDOFF KIN( OHHTJ~ SVSTEII (GSTANIDS) 31,649 33,2~9 ·4,400 

1~2 ~USIIV IIOUNTEO OETECTlON SVSTEII (M~OS) .. 18.545 .. 16.545 

123 ROIIOTlC CON!IAT SUPPORT SYSHII .. 4.701 •• 701 

121 EOO ROBOTICS SVSTEIIS !1!'CAPITAli1ATION 8 346 ~. ).46 

>25 nPL05!YE ORON.I.NCE OISI'OSAL EQPIIT (£00 EQPH). "' •s.sse '" H.e.56 

12H REHOTE 0[110l!T!ON SYSHHS 4.485 4.48~ 

121 lTEIIS LESS THAN $5H, CQUNTERHINE EOUIPHENT. " ~.U38 " 4,939 

COti&AT SERVICE S\IPPOH ECIUTP~EIIT 

128 H[ATfRS AND ECU'S,. "' 9.235 "' ~' 2J5 

130 50\0lER ENIIANCE~ENT. 1.617 1.en 

131 PERSI)IINEL RECOVEI!V SUPI'ORT SYSTE~ [PRS$) .12,273 16, 7~8 12,273 16.729 

H2 GRDIJND SOLDIER SYSH~ . 3' ~81 ~4, OBI l.561 84,101 

134 fiELD FEEOl~C ECU!PIIEH .. "' 15, ng '" 15,179 

135 CAIII:.O A~Rl~L DEL 1. ~~~SO~~EL PARACHUTE SYSTEII I ,JM :!8, \Q4 ,lB! 28.194 

\37 fA/IllY OF ~NCR COIIIIAT ANO CO~SNI!CTIOM SHS "' 41,9H "' 41 ,987 

136 I'E~S LESS T~M H" IEIIG SPT) "' 2~.0~0 "' :!0,090 

PETROLEU~ EOUIP~EM' 

tJS QUALITY SURHILLA~CE EO\I!P~f~T. 1,43~ I. 0~5 

140 OIST~IBUTlOH SVSTEIIS, ~ETMOUUH & io!ATER "' ~o.6n "' 40,B92 

~EO! CAL €QUJPHEHT 

141 CO~SAT 9UPPORT IIEOJCAL . 2.388 46.957 2.3U 4~' ~57 

~AJNT€NMCE l:OUIPMEn 

142 ~08ILE MIII"Tt"AIICE EOUIPIIE~T SVSH~S ~ 23, TSS " 23.758 

143 !TEllS US$ T~AII $S 011 (IIA!NT !0) "' 2. 769 "' 2.789 

COIISTfiUCTlOK EOi/JPHENT 

H4 GI'..'.DER. ~MD IITZD, "" 6~4 I CCE) " 5,621 " 5,8:17 

14~ SCKAP!:RS, EA~TH~O~l~G " \4,926 " 14,926 

14T CO~PACTOA "' 4,348 "' l,Jl8 

148 HYDHAULIC EXCA~ATOR " 4.il6 " 4.9~9 

H9 fi!ACTOR, F~ll TRACXEO .. " 34,011 " J4 ,071 

1~0 All HRRA[~ CRAIIES 4,916 4,9J8 

151 PLANT, ASPHALT ~!XlMG. u. ... t5J EMHAMC£0 R~PlO AIRF!HO CD~STRI!CTlOH CAPoiJ'. 14.924 14.~24 

154 CONST EQIJ!P ESP, " 15,9]] " 1!.9J3 
~~~ IH"& LESS TAA~ 5~.0~ (CO~ST EOUIP) 

RAIL FLO.OT CONT.O.!~ERllAHON EQUI~E~T 

ISH AR.~Y WATERCRAFT ESP 

157 JHMS LESS TH.o.N 5~ OM [FLOAT/RAIL) 

GENERATORS 

1 &8 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EOIII~ME~T .. 

MlfRlll.l HANOl!IIG fOUIP"ENI 

160 FAMILY OF FOR~LlFTS 

TRATN!r.l(l ~QUIP~fNT 

161 C~I!AT TRAINING C~lfTERS SUPPORT 

182 TR.O.INJNC DEVICES, IIONSYSTEM. 

183 CLOS( CQ!IBJH T.O.CTICAL TRAINER . 

IM ~YlATION CCHOTNED ARMS T.O.CTICAL TRAINH [.INCA. 

185 GAMING HCHNOLOOY IN SUPPORT Of ARftY TI!AINIIIG. 

~UT -~VSURE AN1) DIG ECJUJPM[NT [THO) 

I Sol CAU!IllATIO• SETS E!IUI""ENT 

161 InECIV<TeO fl.l'.lLY OF UST EQUJP~ENT I!I'TE) 

165 T£SI EOUIP~~NI ~OOERNlZATIOft lH~OD). 

OTHER SUPPOiiT EQUJ!>HEIIT 

110 RAPID EllU!P9/NG SOlOIER SUPI'ORT EQUIPMENT 

171 PHVS!CAL SECURTT¥ SYSTE~S (OPAl) 

172 BASE LEVEl CO~'L EOOl!>HEftT . 

113 ~OOJFICATION CIF IN-SIK EQUIP~ENT (OPA-3) 

174 PROOUCT!OH ~SE ~PPORT (OTH) 

175 SPECl.OL <OUIPH~NT F~~ USJ:R TEST!~G 

115 MC CRJT !CAl HE PIS OPAJ. 

TOTAL, OTHER SVPPORT fOUIP~E"T. 

SPARE A~D REPAIR PAUS 

1~0 !Nlll~l SfA~ES. C&C. 

TOI~L >PARE ~NO RfP~lR ~ARTS . 

HMY NATIOHAl GIJMO HMf!W\1 f\CDERN(UTJQN PR<KlllA". 

TOTAL OTHER PROCU~E~E~T ARfiY .. 

143 

euoon 

REQUEST 

01"1' ~~OUIIT 

" 6.U9 

10,51)9 

2,166 

3,&82 115' 190 

'" 14,n7 

6~ .06~ 

" 101,295 

13,40& 

u.uo 

10.165 

~.126 

1 ,6S7 l7' 4&~ 

"' 15.061 

2,380 

30.686 

I .00& 

3 .~09 ~8' 55~ 

1 ,997 

25' ~94 

'" 12' ll75 

146.~11 

" 50,0Jl 

50. on 

~.S9J.~J4 

CO!I~ITTH 

RECO~~E~DEO 

QT'I MO~~T 

" 6,H9 

10,509 

l, 10ft 

3.&45 105,190 

"' 14,327 

e5.06l 

" 106.295 

13,408 

14,440 

10. IG~ 

~.726 

I .~57 37,482 

, 1e,oe1 

2.~60 

30,1;96 

1,008 

J,zog 93,559 

1,697 

25 3114 

'" 12,97~ 

I ,124,221 

" 50,032 

5U,UJ2 

100.000 

4,812,234 

C~ANG< r~Oft 

REQUEST 

OT'f A~OWT 

-n1 -10.000 

•5.000 

-1~.000 

·2~.400 

•100,000 

·81.400 

•••••••••••• •••n•••n~o~nooooo 
144 

EX"LANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

!In thounnds of dol'-111] 

Bud !Jill Committee ,_, r.quest Rec:ommended 

FAMILY OF MEotUM TACTICAL VI:HICLES !0,000 

Program increase 50.000 

FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES 28,425 78,428 

Pro!lr&m inc~sa 50,000 

" MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIPMENT 91,173 83,173 F urodong ahead ol nee<! -8,000 

" WI N-T • OROUNO FORCES TACTICAL NE'TWORK 763,087 66-4,087 Unobligated pnor yaar funds ·99,000 

30 ENROUTE MISSION COMMAND 100,000 80,000 

Funding ahead of need -20,000 

" JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM· HMS 175,711 125,711 Unoblogaled balance$ -50,000 

" MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO 9,692 4,8V2 

Fundmg ahead of need -5.000 

" FAMIL 'f OF WEAPON SIGHTS 49,205 34,201!i 

Funding ahead of need -15,000 

" JOINT BATT\.E COMMAND -PLATFORM 97,892 87,892 

Fundi!1g ahead ol need -10,000 

" COUNTERFIRE RADARS 209,060 159,050 

Funding ahead of naad -50,000 

"' GROUND STANOOFF MINE DETECTION SYSTEM 37,64$ 33,249 

Funding ahead of need -4.400 

158 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT 115,190 10&, 190 

Funding ahead"' n&ed -10.000 

162 TRAINING OEVICES, NONSYSTEM 1(l1,2tS 106,29& 

Pragram m~raase 5,000 

173 MODlFICATION OF IN.SVC EQUIPMENT 98,6&9 83,559 

Funo:Mg ahead of need -Hi.OOO 

ARMY NAnONAl GUARD HMMWV MOO PROGRAM 100,000 

Program •ocrease 100,000 

Change from 

Ftequn.t 

~0.1)00 

50,(100 

·8.000 

..99,000 

-20,000 

-!0,00{) 

~-"' 

-15,000 

·10,000 

-50,000 

-4,400 

-10,000 

5,000 

-15,000 

100,000 
145 

HANDHELD STANDOFF MINE DETECTION SYSTEM 

The Committee recognizes that the Army's AN/PSS-14 Handheld 

Standoff Mine Detection System is a cost effective and efficient 

method of providing a reliable handheld mine detection capability 

to the warfighter. The Committee commends the Army's efforts to 

improve the system's capability through the use of engineering 

change proposals, to seek cost effective mine detection devices, and 

to potentially achieve significant savings. 

BODY ARMOR MODERNIZATION 

The Committee recognizes that numerous lives have been saved 

by body armor. However, the Committee recalls the struggles involved with production, fielding, and maintenance of body armor 

kits at the beginning of the war in Iraq. The Committee directs the 

Secretary of the Army to develop a plan to replace and refurbish 

expired body armor, to modernize the body armor inventory 

through replenishment, and to ensure that the industrial base is 

able to continue the development and manufacture of more advanced body armor. Elements of the plan shall include the completion and issuance of the Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier 

study on the shelf-life of body armor, consistent with that study, 

a determination of the number of pieces of body armor in the inventory that have expired, the qualification by PEO Soldier of the 

progressively lighter body armor that is being developed for the Future Soldier Protection Systems program, a determination of the 

number of expired body armor pieces that should be replaced by 

the lighter body armor qualified by PEO Soldier or refurbished, a 

determination of the amount of body armor procurement (both replacement and refurbishment) required on an annual basis to ensure that the manufacturing base remains viable and is able to 

continue the development of more advanced body armor until the 

Future Soldier Protection Systems program is implemented, and a 

detailed schedule for the replacement or refurbishment of expired 

body armor in the inventory consistent with the PEO Soldier study 

and as discovered in the above determinations. 

AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE PLANNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM 

The air and missile defense planning and control system is an 

Army objective force system that provides integration of air and 

missile defense operations at all echelons. The Committee is aware 

that funding provided in the base budget for fiscal year 2015 will 

be used to buy five air defense and air space management cells. 

The Committee is concerned that the funding requested, which is 

double the amount provided in fiscal year 2014 and half the 

amount provided in fiscal year 2013, may be insufficient to support 

the software upgrades necessary to meet the needs of the air and 

missile defense theater aviation commands. The Committee urges 

the Secretary of the Army to review and stabilize the funding for 

this program. 

HIGH MOBILTTY MULTTPURPOSF. WHEELED VEHICLE MODERNIZATION 

The Committee recognizes that the National Guard has consistently included modernized High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled 
146 

Vehicles (HMMWV) among its top funding priorities. The Committee includes $100,000,000 above the request to modernize the 

aging National Guard HMMWV fleet to satisfy this requirement. In 

conducting fleet modernization, the Committee urges the Secretary 

of Defense to integrate advanced safety systems, including the application of emerging commercial technologies such as electronic 

control units and airbag technology, to improve the safety of these 

vehicles with respect to underbody blast, crash, or rollover events. 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation...... ....................... .................. $16,442,794,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .................. ................ 13,074,317,000 

Committee recommendation . 14,054,523,000 

Change from budget request ......... , ................... +980,206,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $14,054,523,000 

for Aircraft Procurement, Navy. The total amount recommended in 

this bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
I 

/ 

I 

I 

i 

I 

/ 

CO"BAT AIRCRAFT 

EA-18G 

JOINT STRI~E FIG~ER 

JSF STOVL 

JSf STOVl (AP·CY) 

V l2 I~€01U~ LIH) 

tQ v-n I~EOIU~ LIFT: (AP-CYI 

" 

" 

" 

" 

" 

.. 

" 

'" 

UH-1YiA~-1Z (ll"-CY) 

~H-60S I"YP) 

~H ·60R 

~H-EOII. (•P-CY). 

P-611. POSE lOON .. 

P-8.1. POSf!OON (J,P-CV) 

E·20 .O.OV ~.O.H~fYf. 

E-20 AOV NAIIJ(EYF [AP-CY) 

TOTAL, C0~8.0.T AI~CRAFT. 

! 

f 

' 

I 

I 

/ 

f 

l 

147 

(DOllARS IN THOUSANDS) 

I 

I 

BUOGET 

REOOEST 

QTY NiOONT 

"· 

,2?fl-410 

45.920 

" 

~.003.327 

4&.4!7 

619.G70 

ns 765 

8,7BS.GP3 

.. 

" 

" 

1.018,547 

8S5.65;l 

29.400 

200,410 

t4J,&85 

' 481.100 

·~. B20 

90~ ,057 

63,354 

188,$40 

H0,101 

106,686 

CHANGE ~RCI.II 

REQUEST 

OTI' AHOUNl 

•12 +975,000 

-5.900 

•10.300 

17.57< 

_,,. re9 

-63,781 

.. •125,460 

.. •62.401 

-~1 .217 

.. J11.&62 

\ 

\ 

\ 

\ 
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

15 

COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

EA-18G. 

JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 

JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 

JSF STOVL. 

JSF STOVL (AP-CY). 

V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT). 

' ' . ' ' . ' " . 

(AP-CY) 

V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) (AP-CY). 

UH-1Y/AH-1Z ... . . . . . . . . . 

UH-1Y/AH-1Z (AP-CY). ........ 

MH-60S (MYP) .. . . . . . . . . . . . 

MH-60R. . . . . . . . ' 

. ....... 

............ 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . 

.............. 

.... ' .... '.' 

16 MH-60R (AP-CY) ....................................... . 

17 P-BA POSEIDON ....... 

18 P-8A POSEIDON (AP-CY). 

19 E-20 ADV HAWKEYE. 

20 E-20 ADV HAWKEYE (AP-CY) ............................ . 

TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT .... 

detail gpo (PROC) (no line no) (DOC -Filters: I,G 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

2 

6 

19 

26 

8 

29 

43,547 

610,652 

29,400 

1,200,410 

143,885 

1,487,000 

45,920 

778' 757 

80 926 

210 209 

933,882 

106,686 

8 2,003,327 

48,457 

4 819,870 

225,765 

8,768,693 

DE PRDC 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

12 1,018,547 

4 865,652 

29,400 

6 1,200,410 

143 '885 

19 1,481,100 

45,920 

27 809,057 

63,354 

8 188,440 

29 870,101 

106,686 

9 2,128,787 

48,457 

5 902,271 

178 '488 

10,080,555 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

+12 +975,000 

+2 +255,000 

-5,900 

+1 +30,300 

-17,572 

-21 '769 

-63.781 

+1 +125,460 

+1 +82,401 

-47,277 

+1 ,311,862 

6/11/2014 10:03 AH Page: 14 
OTH€11 .O.!~F!AFT 

" KC·IJOJ 

" f!Q-4 TRlTOH (AP·CY) 

" HQ·B UAV 

TOTAL, OTHER AIRI:.RAFT. 

HDOIFJ~ATlON Of AJRCRAf'T 

" EA·G SEUES. 

" AEA sYSTEMS. 

,, .o.v-a snrE$. 

" ADVEftSARY 

" f·16 SHIES. 

" ~-·~ SHIES 

" ~-53 SERIES 

" SH-80 SlRIES 

" "·' SERIES 

" EP·l SERIES .. 

'" P·J SERIES 

" E 2 SEfi.IEO 

" HAI~ER AIC SERlE$ 

.. C·IJO SERIES .. 

" FEIISG 

.. CARGO/TIIAMSPCRT AIC URJU 

" E·6 SERIH 

.. EHCUTJVE HfliCGPTfRS $ERIES. 

148 

(DOLLARS I~ THOUSAIIOS) 

B\!OGET 

REQVHT 

QTY AIIOUIIT 

92.290 

3/.U~ 

40.6E3 

!T0.3i16 

IO,~J 

J4. rsa 

6&.472 

8.418 

B/9 177 

'"" JB 159 

108.8M 

45,033 

H.690 

2.623 

21, lOB 

12,608 

40,J7B 

.. , 

4.615 

212. ~7R 

71.328 

CQMHTTTE~ 

~ECOHHENOEO 

Q'N A"''UNT 

92,290 

e1.a1o 

39,603 

1&9,623 

10,1193 

44,168 

51,972 

8. "6 

638,0~0 

"" 38,619 

101,0M 

42,27J 

J< .BEIO 

2,82J 

21 .208 

12,61)!! 

35,~22 

''" 4,035 

19~.006 

sa, r2a 

Cw.t.NGE F~H 

REQUEST 

On' MO\JNT 

·l.DDD 

•29,225 

•1D,DDO 

·7,500 

-~3. H7 

·1.5•0 

. 7' 70~ 

·2.1M 

-~00 

3.200 
.. 

.. 

" 

" 

" 

" 

" 

" 

'" 

,. 

" 

" 

" 

" 

" 

., 

"" 

" 

.. 

.. 

,, 

" 

149 

{OOll~~S IN THOU~NDS) 

S~EC!M FI'!IQJECT AIFIC~T . 

T-~5 SERHS 

POIIER I'LAHT CHANGES .. 

JPATS SERIES 

CO~MOM fCft tQI.IIPnENT. 

CONM(Ifj AVIONICS CHA~GE$ 

CO~ft~ OEF<:~SWE WUPON SYSTEM .. 

!D SVSTEU .. 

P·B S~RI(S 

~AGTF EN FOR II.VIAT]~ 

M0-8 S<:~!ES. 

I«!- I SE~!ES. 

V-22 {TILT:MTOR ACI'Ti OSPREY 

F-35 STO~L SE~HS 

F 35 Cl/ SERIES. 

TOlAl, MOOlflCATlON OF MRCRAFl. 

AlRCAAFT SP.o.RES AND REPMR PAR13 

SP.I.RES ANO REPAIR PARTS 

~~~CR~FT SU9PWIT EOUIP"EU ~HO FII.CILIT!ES 

'O~~ON ORCUHO fOI!IPMENT 

A lRCRAFf INOI!STR!AL FII.ClL I rJ ES 

WAR (0NSUMA8l~S 

OTI!H P~fiO~tTTOM CHARGFS 

SPECIAL SUPPCRT EOU:PMEMT. 

FIRS' [)fS7!HATION HII.NSPOHAT!ON. 

TOTAL A!R'CRAH SUPPO~T EOU!P~EMI & FACILI! lOS .. 

TOUL. AIRCRAFT P~OC\IR~~ENT, NAVY 

BUDGET CO~~!TTEE 

REQU~ST RECO~~-M~EQ 

QTY -'"O~T QTY .V.OONT 

21.317 2\,ll7 

90.052 90.052 

19,09~ 19.~4 

I .085 1,08~ 

1 ~5 ,6'-'1 144,427 

157.531 151.~31 

t ,958 1 ,9sa 

38,880 38,680 

29,197 211,7117 

14,770 14,HO 

8.141 6. 7~1 

l.H~ 2,H2 

135.584 1~8.423 

285.986 209,811 

20,502 20,051 

2,374.201 2.198.021 

1 ,229.~51 1,064,811 

~16,355 39!,.88 

23.843 n,l:l-43 

·~.939 15,939 

5.630 S.SJO 

65.939 65,639 

"' 1 '760 

"' "' 511,507 

13,074' J 11 H,OH.52J 

C~AM!lE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AIIOUNT 

-II ,211 

-I.IM 

-16,091 

-451 

-IT~, 114 

-1&4.840 

-19.367 

.J;,an 

•980, 706 

•••n••••••• •••••••••••••••nu• 
150 

EXPL.ANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

(In lhouunda of dollar~ I 

Budget Committe& Change from ,_, FtoquHI Recommended Regunt 

EA-1BG 43,547 1,018,547 975,000 

Program 1ncrease !Welve aircra~ 975,000 

JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 610,652 665,652 255,000 

Pmgram increase- two a.rcraft 255,000 

V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) 1,487,000 1,<181,100 -&,900 

ECOgrcwlh -5,900 

" UH-1YIAH-1Z na.rsr 809,057 30,300 

ProQfam oncrease- one a1rcraf1 30,300 

" UH-1YIAH-1Z jAP..CY) 80,926 63,3&4 -11,572 UH·lY AP cost grDWih -14,600 

AH-1Z AP cost growlh -1.372 

Support funding carryover -1.600 

13 MH.&OS (MYP) 210.209 188,~ -21,7e9 

ShutdO'M'llur.ding ahead of !'leed -17.000 

EliCE~ss peculiar training equipment -<1.769 

" MH-60R 933,882 870,101 -tl3,781 

E~cesa ECO funding -6,581 

A•rframe pecu~a-r ground &upoorl equipment growtl\ -17,000 

AVIonics peculiar llround support equipment growth -28,000 

Pubs./lech data growttl -5,000 

Shutdown funding anead of need -1,600 

Suppo1'1lund1ng carryover -5.600 

" P-3A POSEIDON 2.003,327 2,12&.797 125,460 GFE eo&! grow1h -11.040 

Airlr&rl"l$ eon tract savmgs -13,000 

Support ll.lrldong carryover .... 500 

Program increa$e- one alrcrEI" 1S<ri.OOO 

" E-ZO AOII H ... WKEYE 819.1170 g[)2,271 112.401 MYP contract sav1ngs -30.000 

Airlrarl"'e cast growth -28.920 

GFE electron,cs co5l growth -2.188 

Olher GFE cost grow1h -2.241 

Av•on1cs pecul,~r ground s1.1ppon equipment co~t growth -15,000 

Support funding carryo-.ar .6,250 

Program oncrea~e- ooe alrcrall 167,000 

" f·W AO'J HAWKEYE (AP-CY) 225,785 178,488 -47,277 EOQMng lead eosl growth -47.277 

" MQ-4 TRITON (AP·CY) 37,445 67,670 30,225 RephaseAP :30.225 

" MQ-3 UA'J 40,61113 39,663 ·1,000 

Suppor1 funding carryover -1,01)1) 

" AEA SYSTEMS 34,768 44,768 10.000 

Program incrvase -low band transmiller l.lpgrades 10.000 
151 

Budgat CommlttH Change from 

P·1 Reque•t Re,;;ommend.d Request 

" AV-tl SERIES se,472 57,972 -7,500 

Liten•ng pod upgrade kit cost grQWif'l (OSIP 023-00) -7,500 

" F-18 SERIES 679,111 038,030 -43,147 

Non-recurring inslallation equipment grCWih (OSIP 1 t-99) -2,000 

Support Q(lUipmant and other support funding carryover 

(OSIP 11-99) -J,OOO 

ECP 904 inst&llatioo o:;q$1 growth (OSIP 11·99) -3,104 

Non-recurring ins.tallalion 8CIU1pr!le!'lt growlh (OSIP 21-00) -1.200 

ILS growth (OSIP 14-03) ·6.200 

Otl'ler support forward funded (OSIP 14-03.) -12,158 

ECP 6038 mdome A-kils ahead of need (OSIP 002-07) ·2,364 

Support equlpmanii\Jndtng pre~iously awoprialad (OSIP 

11-10) -3,501 

Data funding growth (OSIP 018-14) -9,600 

" H..SJ SERIES 38,1'9 36.61!il -1,,..0 

Ksp!On wiring in$lallation cost gtow1h (OSIP 003-06) -1,540 

" SH-60 SERIES 108.850 101,(164 -7,786 

Data li<1k A-k•t cosl growth (OSIP 009-07) ..S,OBS 

Other support growth (OSIP 009-07) -1,700 

" H·1 SERIES 45,033 42,213 ·2,160 

FOJII motoon yideo onataNation cost grOWih {OSIP 015-12) -1.000 

E'lrita star block liB kil contract ~av~ (OSIP 016-12) ·1.780 

.. C·130 SERIES 40,378 35,522 -4,856 

NAE ahead of need (OSIP 020-12) -1.106 

NRE ahaillJ of ne-ed (OSIP 019-\4) ·3,750 

.. C.A.RGO!TRANSPORT AJC SERIES 4,635 4,03~ «><> lnstaHabon cost grawrh (CNSIATM OSIF') ·60<> 

" E-6 SERIES 212,878 193,006 ·19,870 Ewceu S>IPPOrl fundong (OSIP 003--04) -3,150 

su;P mstallal•on cost gmwlh (OSIP OOJ-07) ·3,941 

Commlmk;litlons opgrad!l kil onstalla!ion ahead of naed 

(OSIP 012-0?) -4,145 

B1ock 1upgtade kit installation ahead of nlllld (OSIP 008-

10) -6,387 

FAB· T Ia~ production ooncurmncy (QSIP 010-12) -2.247 

.. EXECUTIVE HEt.ICOPTERS SERIES 71,328 61,128 ·3,200 

NRC restructure (OSIP 010-12) -3,200 

.. COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT 156,&44 144,427 ·11,211 

Tasting (OSIP 005-0B) -3.260 

AL0-214 install equipment 00$1 growth (OSIP 004·12) ·5.957 

Other s1opport growth (OSIP 004-12) ·2.000 

" V·22 (nL TIROTOR ACFT) OSPREY 135,584 128,423 .r,ue lnstallahon ah~ad of need (OSIP 022·01) -5,804 

Main landtng gear f"ll ~OJpprassion A-kots ah&ad of n&&d 

(OSIP 022·01) -1,352 
,_, 

63 F-35 STOVL SERIES 

B1oclc 31 upgrade krt cosl growth (OSIP 015-14) 

Concurrency re-pricing {OSIP 023-14) 

&4 F-35 CV SERIES 

Concurrency re-pricing {OSIP 024-14) 

65 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

JSF STOVL o;(Jsl gruwth 

Replenishmenl spares grow1h 

66 COMMON GROUNO EQUIPMENT 

TPS lransili¢'1 grOWih 

KC-130J Simulator upgrade C051 growth 

T --<~5 nigh! tra1ner upgrades conlracl delay 

CH-53E 1ra1nar upgrades C0!1tract delsy 

E-2/C-2 lralnar upgrades comracl delay 

152 

Budget 

Requ .. 1 

285,9611 

20,S02 

1.22V1!!11 

418,355 

Committee Chlm11e from 

Recommendlld ReQuee1 

209,877 -76,091 

·8,274 

87,817 

20,01!11 ~" -451 

1.084,611 -164,840 

-42,695 

-122,145 

398,488 ·19,887 

-1.156 

-2.721 

-8,397 

·4,101 

-3,492 
153 

MH-60R 

The Navy proposes to prematurely terminate the MH-60R helicopter production line in fiscal year 2016, despite the program 

being bound under a multi-year procurement contract, along with 

the Army's UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters. The rationale for this 

termination is due to force structure changes, partially driven by 

the decision to decrease the number of carrier air wings as a result 

of the Navy's decision to prematurely decommission the USS 

George Washington (CVN-73). As discussed elsewhere in this report, the Committee provides the required fiscal year 2015 funding 

to retain CVN-73, thus obviating that variable as a reason to prematurely terminate the MH-60R procurement program. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Navy to fully fund the remaining MH-60R helicopters as previously planned and fulfill the terms 

of the joint H-60 multi-year procurement with the Army. 

EA-18G AIRCRAFT 

The EA-18G aircraft provides the Navy, and the nation, with an 

unequaled airborne electronic attack capability. The Navy has recently conducted studies showing that the capability brought by the 

EA-18G aircraft increases with the addition of two aircraft per carrier based squadron. Due to an increasing electronic threat from 

the nation's adversaries, the Committee sees great value in a more 

capable airborne electronic attack presence. Therefore, to begin to 

increase the size of carrier based airborne electronic attack squadrons, the recommendation provides an additional $975,000,000 for 

the procurement of twelve EA-18G aircraft. 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ...................................... $3,009,157,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ....................................................... 3,217,945,000 

Committee recommendation .................... ... ................. ................... 3,111,931,000 

Change from budget request ......................... ............... -106,014,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,111,931,000 

for Weapons Procurement, Navy. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
OIH~R ~l$SllE$ 

Sli!AT~~I' HiSSl~ES 

TOHM~WK 

TACTICAL HlSSTLfS 

MRAAII 

SlOEWINOH. 

""' 

ST.O.HOARO HfSSIIf 

"" 11 STA~D 0~1= PRECISION GUHlEO HUNIT!OW 

12 .O.U!Al TARGHS 

13 OTHER ~!SS!lE SUPPORT 

~OD!FlCAT!OH or ~lSSlLES 

ESS~ 

SUPPORT EOUIPIIE~T AND FAClLlliES 

1~ W[APONS !HOUS!Ml.O.l f.O.ClllTIE$. 

~AVY 

154 

JOOll.o.MS IN THOUS.O.HilS! 

aUOGET 

REQ\JEST 

OH AMOUNT 

1. 190.•6~ 

5,671 

"' 

445.836 

3.295 

, 1 ~' 434 

111 '739 

i n sert- 15'1 Am 

'"' 

'" 

"' "' 

"' 

5.611 

1,171,619 

211,958 

&8.2d8 

108.H9 

4M .636 

ao. 1112 

1,810 

45,683 

114,434 

105,489 

:1,531 

206 '700 

73.211 

CHA~GE FROH 

KEOUEST 

OTY AIIOU~T 

·23,f>07 

·2J,507 

+71.100 

-32,165 

-11,000 

-2.363 

·5,000 

5.2SO 

-2,000 

-a.Js& 
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

BALLISTIC MISSILES 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

TRIDENT II MODS. 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 

2 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES. 

3 

4 

TOTAL, BALLISTIC MISSILES. 

OTHER MISSILES 

STRATEGIC MISSILES 

TOMAHAWK. . ................................ . 

TACTICAL MISSILES 

AMRAAM. . ........... . 

5 SIDEWINDER. 

6 JSOW .. 

7 STANDARD MISSILE ... 

8 RAM. 

11 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITION. 

12 AERIAL TARGETS ........... . 

13 OTHER MISS! LE SUPPORT ........ . 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

14 ESSM. .. .......... 

15 HARM MOOS. 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 

16 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES. 

17 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON .. 

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

18 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................ . 

TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES. 

detail gpo (PROC) (no line no)(DOC .. -Filters: I,G 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

1,190,455 

5' 671 

1 ' 196. 1 26 

100 194,258 

32 '165 

167 73,928 

200 130,759 

110 445,836 

90 80,792 

14 1 '81 0 

48,046 

3,295 

104 119,434 

111,739 

2,531 

208,700 

73,211 

1 '526 '504 

DE PROC 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

196 

167 

200 

11 0 

90 

14 

104 

1 '166 '948 

5,671 

1,172,619 

271,958 

68,248 

108,159 

434,836 

80,792 

1 '81 0 

45,683 

3,295 

114,434 

106,489 

2,531 

206,700 

73,211 

1,518,146 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

-23,507 

-23,507 

+96 +77,700 

-32,165 

-5,680 

-22,600 

-11 '000 

-2,363 

-5,000 

-5,250 

-2,000 

-8,358 

6/11/2014 10:03 AM Page: 17 
TORPEDOES ANO RHAHO EQUIPMENT 

TORPEDOES ANO RHATi'O EQUIP 

" SSTD 

" ~~·•S TO~PEDO 

" ASW TA.RGHS. 

" MK-~4 TORPEDO HODS 

HOC OF TORPEOOH A~D RHATEP fOU!P 

" MK-~8 HlRPfOO ADCAP 1'1005, 

" QUlCKSTRlKS MINE 

SU~ORT EQUIPMENT 

" TORPEDO SUPPORT EllUIP!lENT 

" ASW !lANCE SUPPORT 

DEST!IIATlON TRIINSPORT ... TION 

" FIRST OESTlNAHON TRANSPOir.ATUJtL 

TOTAL, '0~PEOOE9 ANO RELATED EQUIPHEIIT,. 

O!HH JoiUPO~S 

CUN$ AND OUH IIOUNTS 

" SIUll UHS AND WEAP<JNS .. 

MOOIFICV!ON OF GUMS AND GIIN HOONT$ 

" CI\IS "DOS 

" COAS f GUA~O \OEAI'O~~ 

,, GUN HOU~T ~00~ 

" A!R!!OilNE H!ME NEUTRAl.IZ~HO~ SHTEKS 

TOTAL O~HEII WOI'OoS .. 

" SPARES ~~D REPAIR H~TS. .. 

TOTAl, WtAP(IMS P~OCUREHENT, AAW 

155 

(~ I ~~S IN TH<li!SAI<OS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY ..... OVNT 

&.S62 

H,153 

i.515 

YB,!il28 

45.GiJ 

6 gee 

52.610 

J, 795 

J,e92 

236,1H 

13,740 

75,108 

15, 9~8 

62,551 

15,006 

184,953 

u.tU 

3.217.9<5 

COHM!TTH 

RECO~~END€0 

OTY AHOU~ 

5.1)62 

2.515 

58,255 

u.ae 

e.~ee 

50,010 

3. 79~ 

3,592 

113,151 

13.2.10 

12,258 

1l' 356 

59' 967 

15,006 

1TJ,82T 

H,\88 

3. ttl .~31 

CMAHG!i FROM 

REOlUEST 

OTY AMOUNT 

1 ~00 

"u •53 

·40.613 

·4,097 

~.600 

-6J,02J 

-2.8SO 

-S.S$2 

-2.68< 

-11.126 

-108,014 

zn:n• .... • u•••••••••~o .. uo: 
156 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thouunds of dolla111J 

,_, 

1 TRIOfNT II MOOS 

SPAL T kit cost growth 

Guodanc. hardware cc5l growth 

3 TOMAHAWK 

Suppo'\ tundong C<lfryv.oer 

Canoster con\rect s~vooga 

Program oncrease. 96 miSJJile~ 

~ AMR.U.M 

Unjustified re<:lvest 

5 SIDEWINDER 

Block II AUR costgro'Nih 

SvPpol1 f\Jnding carryover 

iJSOW 

AUR oost growth 

E~cess command and ll!unchltest ertd evaluation funding 

T elemete'll ahead of neeoi 

7 ST.t.NDARO MI9SILE 

Suppor1 fundlno;J Cllrryover 

lnstallal•on, ehacKout, ~nd traoni...g growth 

12 AERIAL TA.ROETS 

MSST 10f19 lead ahead of need 

Minion terget kit growth 

14 ESSM 

Support !vno:!ing caayover 

15 HARM MOOS 

AUR kit cost gi'C'Wih 

Tcohng and test eqvipment grow\h 

17 FLEET SATELLfTE COMM FOLLOW-ON 

Suppon 1\ir"ldlng cal'l)'over 

19 SSTO 

Suppon lund•ng growth 

Unfunded ootyear la1l 

20 MK-48 TORPEDO 

Suppo~ lur'ld•ng ah.ead of need 

U Ml<-54- TORPEDO MODS 

bcesa mod•ficallOI'1 krt •nslallalion ll.lr'ldi~Q 

Unju~lilied NRE 

MK-54 ~·I contrac1 &lio 

VLJ\ kll eonrracl 'illip 

23 MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP MOOS 

Cr~so~er oartery coolract s11p 

SuppOrt 1\jndlrlQ carryover 

Budget 

Requeti 

1,190,45& 

1&4,268 

32,165 

73,928 

130,759 

4'5,836 

<18,048 

111,738 

208,700 

e,682 

1-4,1-SJ 

t8,928 

-48,893 

Committee 

Reeommendecl 

1,U8,M8 

·917 

·22.500 

271,968 

-3,000 

·1.000 

81,700 

-32,165 

88,2<18 

-1,980 

-3,700 

108,1&9 

-6.600 

-6,000 

·10,000 

-434,838 

-10.000 

-1000 

.s,sn _,., 

·'2.000 

114,<13<1 

-5.000 

2:08,700 

-2.000 

5,062: 

·1.000 

.;oo 

·1<1, 1-53 

58,2-56 

·5,900 

·2.5~ 

-28,100 

-4,120 

<12,796 

-1.097 

-3,000 

Change from 

Requn.t 

-23,5(17 

77,700 

-32,1U 

-5,660 

·22,600 

-11,000 

-2.,363 

-5,250 

-2,000 

-1,600 

·14,163 

-4(1,873 
,_, 

2!i TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

Sul)pOrt fundi~ carryover 

H CIWS MODS 

Coast Guard CJWS 11head of need 

30 COAST GUARD WEAPONS 

MK-36 MOO 2 gun contract del a~ 

31 GUN MOUNT MOrn! 

tnstallatton funding ahaad oll'eed 

157 

Budg•l Committee Change from 

Raqueat R•enmm,nded Req~l 

52,670 50.070 ·2.&00 

-2,600 

75,108 ,.,.. ·%.8.!0 

·2.550 

18,9o4a 13,358 -6,692 

-6,592 

62,$51 61,H7 •%,684 

-2.684 
158 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, NAVY AND MARINE 

CORPS 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ..................... ................. $549,316,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ................ ................... 771,945,000 

Committee recommendation ................. 629,372,000 

Change from budget request ........ .,,,,,,,,,,,,,................... -142,573,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $629,372,000 for 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2015: 
P~OCURE~HI1' OF MKO, ~AllY & MRI~E CURl'S 

~ROC M~. ~AW 

HAllY AMPIUNIT!OH 

GENEI!Al PU~POSE BOHBS 

A TRIJORNE ~OCKHS, AU TYPES 

M~C~l~E GUN ""HUN!TION. 

P~ACTICE BOMBS 

CARTRIDGES & CART .O.CTUAHD DEVICES. 

AIR EXPENDMLE COUNT(RII[A$\IRES 

JATOS 

LUAP 

$ I~CN/54 GUN A~UNITIO~. 

'" lNH!II'IEOIHE CAl TBt~ GU~ ,_..HUNlTION 

" OTHER ~lP GUN AHHUNITIOH 

" SHALL .oJIHS I LANDING PARrY AMHO. 

" PV!iOTECHN!C AA0 OHOUTIQN .. 

" AHHU~If!O~ LESS TH~ S5 HllllON .. 

TOTAL, PROC MHO, NAVY .. 

159 

8\IOGET CO~HlnEE 

a~QUEST RECOME!IDEO 

QTY MO\IfH QTY NIOU"T 

107.069 ro. roo 

10.1116 87,418 

<0.284 20' 284 

26.701 26, 70! 

~l.!MI 50,66~ 

59.294 S!i,294 

2.166 

113 092 11~.092 

35.702 J~. 702 

36.~15 2.133 

41,906 10.118 

~~ '~15 ~0.535 

11.U2 11 .652 

4.H3 1.~7 

637.111 539,998 

Cf!MOE FROK 

~eauEST 

On' AIIOU~T 

-~e.JM 

-2.gsc 

-J,OOO 

-2.766 

-34.142 

11.190 

_, ,000 

-2.966 

-91.213 
P~OC AHHO, !WilliE CORPS 

H.lfllNE CO~PS A~U~Il!ON 

" SHALL A~HS AHHL)JjJT!ON .. 

'" ll~EA~ CNI.IiGES All TYPES., 

" 40 HH. All TYI'ES 

" ~OHH, All TYPH .. 

" 61HH, ALL TVF'fS .. 

" 1201111 All T'IPES. 

" GRENAOH AU TYPES 

" ROCt;£TS. ALL iYPES 

" ~RT!LLERV. ALL TV PES 

" f~H, A.LL T'IPES . 

" NON LET~ALS 

" M~ HOOERN!Z.O.Tl<IN. 

" IrE~S \.ESS THAN $5 Hlll!ON 

TOTAl., PF!IIC A~O. MARINE CORPS 

TOTAL. PRCCUREHENT OF AHHO. !UoVV & MRINE C<lRPS 

160 

aUDGH 

REQUEST 

QTY ~OU~T 

31. 70~ 

'" 13.630 

2-261 

1 .• 9E 

·~ .8&~ 

4.000 

16,853 

14 772 

9.972 

... 12 JlW 

" '" 

1H,734 

711 ,945 

CO~HJTHE 

RECOIIHEIIDEO QTY MOUNT 

31,708 

"' e.ges 

~' 281 

1.496 

7,14' 

3,000 

"' 12,066 

... 11 ,Jig 

11,178 

89.374 

629.37~ 

CHANG~ FF!IIH 

REQUEST QTY AI!(IUNT 

-6.865 

·1.711 

-I .000 

-18,308 

-~ .104 

-9,'i1i 

-1 .~00 

-•5,36C 

············- -142.Hl 

•~ .... *"~•·~ ~·••nn::n~:o:: .. : 
161 

EXPlANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dalla~l 

Budget Commlttft Ct..nge fi'Om 

P·l Roquo,.t Recommende-d R11q~.~•at 

1 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 107,069 70,700 ..36,389 

OireC1 a11ack rn~vlng targl!'t capability cost growlh -1,~2 

FMU-139 ~ontrect deiey -12.000 

Laser gUtded bomb tail kit contract del a~ -16.647 

Produc! mproveme~t pro~ram growth ~.000 

SUPPOrt lllnding carryover -2,2((1 

AIRBORNE ROCKETS, All TYPES 70,396 67,416 ·2,980 

Support lunding carrtaver -1,000 

APKWS contract savings -1,980 

' CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES 63,86& 60,866 ~.ooo 

F-1S OIFRS growl~ -1,000 

T-6Agrowlh -2.000 

JATOS 2,766 0 -2,761 

Progra~ delay -2.766 

10 INTfiUIIEOIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION 36,475 2,133 -34,342 

MK-2Q5 57MM contract delay -24,70<1 

MK-296 57MM ~ontract delay -9,636 

" OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION 43,901 30,116 -13,790 30MM c;onlracl dalay -13_790 

" SMALL ARMS 1o LANCING PARTY AMMO 51,535 60,636 -1,000 s~pport t~nd•ng carryc~er -1,000 

" AMMUNITION LESS THAN $6 MILLION 4,U3 1,507 -2,966 

LUU-19 paraH&rn centrad cia Ia~ -2.966 

" 40 MM, ALL TYPES 13,830 6,96~ .&,686 

C1 LAP ~;IS OOSI Qrowlh -B10 

~OMM pr~dice d~ylmghl LAP kil c:()f1tract delay -5,B55 

" 120MM, ALL TYPES 14,856 7,1U -7,111 

120MM white pho$phoroos AUR oomract delay -7,711 

" GRENADES, ALL TYPES '·"' :),000 •1,000 

66MM SSVL MK-1 contract delay -1,000 

" ROCKETS, ALL TYPES 16,853 "' -1&,308 

B3MM HEA comract delay -16,308 

" ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES 14,772 n,ou -2,70<1 

HE M795 explosi've rill growth -2,704 

" FUZE, ALL TYPES 9,972 -t,972 Prectsion guided fuze contract delay -9,972 

" AMMO MOOERNlZATION 12.319 11,318 -1,000 Program grow1h -1.000 
162 

SHIPBUJLDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation......................................... $15,231,364,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request 14,400,625,000 

Committee recommendation 14,256,361,000 

Change from budget request .......................... ,.,,,,, .................. -144,264,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $14,256,361,000 

for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
163 

jOOLLOJ!S I~ TKOUSAIIOS) 

S~!P8UilOING ~CONVERSION, NAVY 

OTHER W~RSHIP$ 

CAII:R I OR REPlACU!'Nl PIIOGRAM. 

¥!R!;JNJA ClASS SUBMARINC 

¥1R!;INIA Cl.O.SS SU8~ARI~E (AP-CVI 

DOG \ODD 

OOG-51 

LITTORAl COMBAT S~IP 

AMP~l810US SKIPS 

10 LP0-11. 

TOTAL. MPH!SIOU3 S~!PS . 

AUXILI-'.R!ES, CR.lFT, •ND P~IO~-YUR PIWGAAM COSTS 

18 ~Ot>flED TRAI~IIfli SHIP . 

\! MOORED T~AlNJNG SHIP (AP) 

Ill DIITFilfiNG 

19 SHIP TO S~ORE COIINECTOF! . 

20 LCAC SLEP 

TOTAL, ~U~lllAI<HS. CRAFT. M"O PRIOR·YEAR PIIIJGI!AM. 

TOTAL. 8HIP8Uli.DING & CONVERSIO". NAV"I' . 

BUOCn COKHlTlEE 

Rl:QUEST RECOMENOEO 

OTY AKOUNT QTY ANQUNT 

I ,300,000 

3,S53, ;>5' 

2,330.32& 

134.039 

,427,0'9 

11 635.G14 

12.M5 

4.~80 

46.246 

5,6 104 

1,001.285 

14,,00,82S 

~- 507' 175 

2.655. 785 

13~,039 

951,365 

11.750,2'7 

12,565 

2\1.093 

1J1,UB 

491.797 

123,233 

40,4&~ 

1.eo1,2as 

14,:156,351 

CHAHGE FRan 

RfU\I£Sf QTY AMOUNT 

H,8JO 

·BS,J67 

-4.590 

·5,_307 

-14~.284 
164 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

(In thouund• r:>l doUar11J 

P-1 

1 CARRIER REPI..ACEMENT PROGRAM 

CANES cost grow1h 

CANES syslam engmeenng grO\\IIh 

0Jg~el modulor riildoo cost growth 

IFF cost growth 

SPN..oi6 COS! grOW!h 

Technical engineenng serv1ces growth 

2 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE 

ProPu'ek:m equipment cost grow!h 

GFE eavings 

3 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE (AP.CV) 

PropulSion equ•pmenl ~ost grOWl~ 

~ CVN REPUELING OVERHAULSIAP.CY) 

PrograM 1ncrea&e. restore CVN-13 refuel<ng 

7 ODG·Ii1 

Main reductoon gear conlract SBV1''9' 

Toma~ewi< weapons ~~atem Olher oost growth 

SQQ-89 hardware excen to need 

9 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP 

Reduce one sl'lop 

15 JOINT HIO~ SPEED VESSEL 

Program closeoul ahead of need 

1B OUTFITTING 

LPD-26 oulfitting phas1ng 

AFSB-2 0\Jtfitt•ng phasing 

ODG"1001 outfinino phuing 

SSN-187 e~utfit\lng phasing 

SSN-788 t~ulfrtllng pha&•ng 

LCAC-78 ~nd 83 post delivery .snead of need 

AFSEI-1 post delivery ahead of need 

LCS-7 and e post dehery phasing 

SSN-766 post delivery ahea<l ol need 

SSN-7S7 po$1 delivery ahead of n~ed 

Budgti 

Raqunt 

1,300,000 

3,1i53.,2U 

~.J30.325 

0 

2.671,416 

1,427,1)49 

4,590 

t-48,104 

Committee 

Recommanded 

1,289,425 

-2.051 

-1.543 

-1,092 

-t.573 

-1,473 

-2,9<13 

3,507,175 

-42,700 

-3,379 

2,301,825 

·28.500 

491,100 

491.100 

2,65!i'.7B5 

-6.122 

-1 720 

-7.788 

1151,36! 

-475,683 

-4,590 

491,797 

-8.950 

-4.316 

-10,770 

-8,000 

-1.600 

·41 1 

-2,911 

-10.862 

-7,9~9 

_,., 

Ch~nga from 

Requ'"l 

-10,675 

-46,079 

·28,600 

491,100 

-54,307 
165 

CRUISER MODERNIZATION 

The Committee is pleased that the budget request did not pro· 

pose to retire seven Ticonderoga Class Guided Missile Cruisers as 

bad been proposed for the last two years. These cruisers have 

many years of additional service life remaining and with the Navy 

struggling to reach and maintain its requisite fleet size of 306 

ships, retiring these valuable assets early does not make sense. 

However, the Committee was disappointed that the most recent 

Navy proposal included a plan to lay-up eleven of these ships for 

an average of nine years, starting in fiscal year 2015. The Com· 

mittee is concerned that this long term lay-up will lead to decom· 

missioning some or all of these cruisers in the near future. While 

the Committee understands the rationale for the proposal, there is 

likely a more reasonable middle ground between continuing to op· 

erate the ships and decommissioning the ships. Therefore, the 

Committee agrees with a lay-up and modernization plan for the 

cruisers) with certain modifications. Instead of inducting all eleven 

cruisers at one time, the Secretary of the Navy is directed to induct 

no more than two cruisers per year into the phased modernization 

period, beginning with two cruisers being inducted in fiscal year 

2016. Further, the Secretary of the Navy is directed to allow no 

more than six cruisers in lay-up at any given time. Finally, the 

Secretary of the Navy is directed to ensure that the duration of the 

lay-up period be no longer than four years and that modernization 

equipment be ordered and placed on contract in the year prior to 

the ship entering its modernization period. The Committee believes 

this approach will maximize the use of the Navyls cruiser fleet 

while ensuring it is modernized and relevant for the duration of its 

service life. The Committee recognizes this approach comes with a 

cost and therefore adds $540,000,000 to the Ship Modernization, 

Operations, and Sustainment Fund, as outlined in title VIII of this 

bill. 

AIRCRAFT CARRIER REFUELING 

The Navy includes no funding in the fiscal year 2015 budget re· 

quest for the refueling of the aircraft carrier USS George Wash· 

ington (CVN-73). While the Secretary of the Navy explained this 

as a cost saving measure and a deferral of the actual refueling de· 

cision, the Committee believes it to be a shortsighted position since 

the Congress has already appropriated in excess of $500,000,000 

towards the effort. The George Washington will have half of its 

service life remaining after being refueled. Nearly $3,000,000,000 

was invested for the construction of the George Washington in 

1983, and the Committee believes that walking away from the 

George Washington halfway through its service life is shortsighted. 

The Committee is also concerned with the Navy's lack of budgetary 

discipline, sending a fiscally broken program to Congress for the 

second consecutive year. Last year, the Secretary of the Navy did 

not fully fund the procurement of the two submarines requested, 

forcing Congress to provide nearly $1,000,000,000 to fully fund the 

J?rogram. Again this year, the Committee must provide 

$789,300,000 to maintain the CVN-73 refueling schedule, despite 

the Navy's claim it can simply defer the decision to fiscal year 
166 

2016. Therefore, the Committee provides $789,300,000 to maintain 

the CVN-73 refueling schedule, and directs the Secretary of the 

Navy to fully fund the remaining cost of the CVN-73 refueling in 

fiscal year 2016. 

LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP 

The Committee is extremely concerned with statements made by 

the Secretary of Defense regarding the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS). 

While presenting the fiscal year 2015 budget, he expressed concerns as to whether LCS has the independent protection and firepower to operate and survive against a more advanced military adversary and emerging new technologies, especially in the Asia-Pacific region. The Secretary further stated that, in light of continued 

fiscal restraints, the Department of Defense must direct future 

shipbuilding resources toward platforms that can operate in every 

region along the full spectrum of conflict. The Secretary subsequently directed that the Navy not engage in new LCS contract negotiations beyond 32 ships and that it submit alternative proposals 

to procure a capable and lethal small surface combatant, generally 

consistent with the capabilities of a frigate. Within these alternative proposals, the Navy should consider a completely new design, existing ship designs, and a modified LCS design. Under the 

current plan, the Navy would purchase the 32nd LCS in fiscal year 

2018, a full four years after the very strong, worrisome statements 

made by the Secretary of Defense. The Committee believes that if 

the current LCS is not the correct small surface combatant of the 

future, the Navy should correct its course sooner rather than later 

and begin purchasing the correct ship well before fiscal year 2019. 

The Committee was surprised that the Secretary of Defense allowed so much time to pass before ensuring the correct small surface combatant begins construction. Therefore, the recommendation 

removes $476,000,000 and one ship from the request to minimize 

the number of ships being procured prior to the completion of the 

Navy's review while maintaining the industrial base. Additionally, 

the Secretary of the Navy is directed to include the results of the 

small surface combatant study into the shipbuilding plan in time 

to influence the procurement of small surface combatant ships in 

fiscal year 2016. 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ................ ........................... $5,572,618,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .................. 5,975,828,000 

Committee recommendation ................. .................. 5,923,379,000 

Change from budget request . ...................... ......................... - 52,449,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $5,923,379,000 

for Other Procurement, Navy. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
OTHER P110CU~EI!E~T, ~"' 

SNIPS SUPPORT EOUlPHfNT 

SHIP PROPULSIO~ EQUIPMENT 

LH·2SOO GAS tuRBINE. 

~LLISOM 501K GAS TURBI~E. 

NYBIIIO ELEtTR!C ORIYE {HEO] 

GEIIEAATDRS 

SUIII'A~E CO~BAHMT HHIE 

NAYIGATIOH EOOTPHE~T 

OTHER HA\II(;.IIl!ON EOUIPHENT . 

PERISCOPES 

SUB PERISCO!'ES I I"AG!NG EaUlP • 

OTHER SH!P90ARO EOUIPHENT 

DOG HOO. 

F!REflGH~ll«l EOU!P~EHT. 

COHHANO .O.HO COH1110L SWITCH91:1AR0. 

,, LHAILHO H!Dl!FE 

" LCC 19120 EHENOEO SERVICE LIFE 

" POLLUTION CO~TROL EOUIPHENT 

" SUSMIUNf. SUPPORT EOUJPHENT 

VI~Cllll~ CLASS SUPPORT EQUlPMENT. 

" LCS Cl~SS SUPPORT EOUlP~ENl 

" SU8HAAINE 8ATTEA!ES 

" LPC CL~SS SUPPOIH EOUlPHt:Nr, . 

'" OOG-1000 SUPPORT EOUIP<'1E~T 

" STIVIH~IC rl.oT~O~H 5UPI'\)~T EOV!e. 

'" DSSP EOUJPHEn . 

" LCAC .. 

" UNOE~HER [00 PRC~RAMS. 

" !TEllS LESS THAN S5 HILLIOH . 

" CHEII!C.O.L WARFARE DETECTORS 

" SUBKAAINE llF'E Slii'PORT SYSTE/1 . 

REACTO~ PLANT EOU!P~ENT 

" REACTOR POWER UHlTS .. 

" RE~CTOR COHPIJNENTS. 

167 

{Cn~LARS I~ THOU5AHOS) 

BUDGET 

HQUEST 

OTY ~~0\.I~T 

7 .82l 

2,155 

22, ?04 

29.120 

(5,431 

60,1170 

338 569 

H,4B6 

2,219 

17.928 

22.02& 

12.607 

10,492 

H.129 

36.206 

31. ~~2 

.9.0116 

l,9i6 

11. ~es 

5, ~18 

l.H8 

~8. 79J 

8!,146 

2,9J7 

8.385 

28&. 622 

COI!HlTlf~ 

RECO~HE~Df~ 

QlV A~O\JNT 

7,622 

(,155 

19,215 

26.664 

44,311 

57,221 

32~.219 

1~.466 

2,219 

U,048 

22.025 

10,148 

1\ ,81 ~ 

70,6811 

25.7~2 

:Mi.l~2 

.u.&e~ 

11.558 

5,519 

7.156 

52,706 

6,,172 

2.1Y.l7 

8,365 

295,2()0 

288,521 

CWAMGE FROH 

R-EQUEST 

QTY AHOU~T 

·3,7•9 

·4,677 

·1.000 

·9.075 

·5,976 

+29B.200 
~E~H ENQI~~ERI~ 

" D!YltiG All(] S"-LYAGE EIIUI~ENT 

S~AU BOI.TS 

" STANDARD BOATS 

IRA!NIH(l EOUI~E"T 

,, OTHH SHIPS TAAIMIHIJ EOUIPNHT. 

PRODUCTION fAC!~ITIES EQUIF~E~T 

" DPEF!.O.TUG FO!iCfS IPE 

O~fR S~lP SUPPORT 

" N~CLEAR AlTEAATIOIIS . 

" LCS 'IOOULtS. 

" LCS ~~~ N!SS!DH IIODULE$. 

" LCS ASW HlSS!DH IIOOULts 

" LCS S\JW HlSSIOil I!()OUlES. 

" REMOTE Hl~EHUNTUIG S~STE~ lAMS) 

LOGISTICS SUPPOitT 

TOT"l. SIUPS SUPPORT EOOIPNENT. 

CO"HLIHICAT!OOS AI!O HECli!ONICS COII!PNE'*"f 

SHIP SONARS ., SPO-I)B AAPAR .. 

" AN/SQQ·89 SURF ASiol CO/IBAT SYSTE~. 

" SS~ ACOUSTICS 

., UND€f!SE.O. IIARfAA!: SUPPORT fOOI~E~T .. 

SONA~ S\I!TCHES A~O TR"'HSD\JCE~S 

ASW HECTRONJC EDU !PMENT 

" SUB~AR!~E ACQU~TIC WA~rA~E SYSH~ 

., ss•o 

.. fi~E~ SU~~tlllMCE SYSTE~ 

.. su~r.o.ss 

.. TACllCA.l SUPPORT CE~TE~ 

UECTRO~IC W.ORFA.~E ECUlP~E~T 

" AHISlD·l2 .. 

RECONNAISSANCE Eti\IIPME~T 

" SHIP80AAO IW E~PLOIT. 

" AUTO~ATEO TDENTJFICATJON SYSH~ (A!S) 

SUeP!ARINE SU~EILLANCE EOUIPnONT 

~ SUSI-WilNE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT P~OG 

168 

BUDGET CON~ !nEE 

R£0\IEST RECO""ENOEO 

~TY ~OUNT Ill¥ MOU<tr 

10.&12 10,512 

IH,184 126,445 

11,152 17' 152 

311. ~09 39,409 

1H,Il9 118,129 

31.•13 31.311 

15.270 15.270 

2.729 

44.208 35.302 

42,H6 •2.276 

1 '702,157 1.008,684 

n.oo1 28,7JS 

79.802 76.802 

165.565 [&().932 

9.487 4,ee3 

11.~21 11,621 

••.221 n.n1 

12.0'1 12.0~1 

HO.&JI 170.6J1 

9.619 9.61[1 

,,_l90 1 •. 390 

2U,582 ID5.002 

124.962 12J.J62 

,.. ,.. 

45.362 Je. 9JB 

CII.'.NGE FRO~ 

REQUEST 

Ql\' l.nOUNl 

·5.096 

·2.H9 

+206.527 

-1,212 

·1.000 

-(.123 

-4.824 

.a,5ao 

·I.SIJO 

·B.•2• 
OTN~R S~JP HECTRO~lC EQUIP~€~ 

" COQPERATPiE """"G~ME~ CAPMIUH 

,. TRIJSTED /WFORMT/OH SYSTE~ (TIS) 

" NAVAl TACT!C.O.L COnNAND SU~J>ORT SVSH~ INn$$). 

" ATOLS 

" ~AVY CO~HMO AND CONTROL SYSTEH (NCCS). 

" ~~N~SWH~lNG S¥STEN REPLACE~ENT 

" NAVSTAR GPS R!;CE !VI':R$ (SPACJ:). 

" AR~EO FORCE$ AADIO AND TV 

•• STIUTEGIC PLATFOftH SUPPORT EQUIP 

TRAINING EOUJPHENT 

.. OTHER TIIAININCl fOUIPMENT . 

.O.VIATlON ElECTRClHIC EOU!PNBlT 

.. MATCAl$ . 

"' SNIPIIOMD AIR TRAFFIC CONTII!)l 

.. AUTO!'II\TIC CARRIER lANDING SYSTEH . 

.. NATlOH.O.L AIR 51'~CE SYSTE~ 

'" AIR ST.O.TION SLIPPORT EOOIPn~NT .. 

" HlCROI<AVE LANDING SYST(I\ 

" ID SYSTEMS. 

" TAC AIC HlSS!I)I! ~LANNING SY$[TI>IIPSI 

OTHE~ SHO~£ ElEC~O~IC EOUIPHENT 

" OEPLO\'ABLE JOINT COHHI\fiD AHO COIIT .. 

" TAD! X·~ .. 

" DCCS-H EDUIPHUT T~CTJC ... LIHCBILt. 

" DCGS-N 

" c.o.ns. 

" RAOJ ... C. 

'" CA~£5-UTFll 

" GPEH. 

" lNHG COH5AT SYSHN TEST FACJLilY. 

" EH! CO~TROL !HSTRUHEUAT!ON . 

.. ITEHS LOSS THAA $1 ~ILLION 

169 

8UOGH Clll!nlTTEE 

~EOOHT RlCO~ntNDlO 

QTY MOUNT QTY AMI\IIjT 

33.939 n.o~u 

"' '" 18, 1~2 \8,192 

16.766 16.768 

~.219 5.219 

42 \0~ 40,499 

IS 231 15,232 

4.5:14 4.~N 

~.l62 S.3B2 

4$,122 44, 0~8 

16,99Q 15,999 

g_l66 ~.366 

21 ,357 21 ,357 

26.639 26,@::19 

~ ,214 9,Z14 

13,902 1l,II01 

34,9g1 za,5•3 

1 J. 9~0 1J,9S(l 

1,205 ~ .105 

3,447 3,44T 

1&.7&6 1&,7&6 

23,849 23.649 

357,5!9 357,589 

!, 3~3 5,1S3 

6~.015 65.015 

8,2B4 6,284 

4,016 4,016 

4, IIJ 4,113 

4~.013 58.365 

CHANGE FRO~ 

REQUEST 

QTY A!IOU~T 

-\ ,&011 

-2,064 

-5,355 

3,190 

•13.312 
Slll~BO.o.RO COH.~UN!CATIONS 

" SlllPBDARD T.OCTICAL CO~H\!HICATIONS .. 

.. ~IP OOHHUNI(:ATICNS AUTOHAT!OII 

.. COMU~ICATIOHS lTEIIS UIIOER $~ 

S\JBMAA!ME COH~U~ICAHONS 

.. SUB~AA!HE B~O~CAST SUPP<lRT .. 

'" SUBMRIME COHHUHIC~TION EOU!PHENT 

SATELLITE COHHUNIC~T ION$ 

" $.0.THllTE COHHUNICAT IONS SYSTEMS 

" NAVY HULTIM"O HRH!N.O.l (NHT) 

SHORE' COHHU~IC~TIOHS 

" J(S COHHUN!CHIONS EOUIPHENT. 

" HECTIHCAL f'OWER SYST~S .. 

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 

" !N~O SYSHMS SECURIT¥ PROGRAM (lSSPI 

" H10 lNHL EXPLO!T.lTlOH TEM 

C~YPTOLOOlC EQ\J!PHE~T 

" CRYPTOLD'GIC COfiHUNICATlllHS EQUIP 

OT~R HECTRONlC SUPPORT 

.. CQI.!;T GUA.~D EQU!PftEWT . 

TOTJ,L, COftft\III!C.O.TlONS ~~b ELECTROIIlCS EQUIPMENT.. 

.O.VlHlOW SUPP'ORT EOUIP~E~T 

SCHCIBI!OYS 

I 00 SOHOB\IOY! • .o.LL TYPES 

.O.lRCAAFT SUPPORT EQUJP~EWl 

101 WUPO~S RANGE SUPPORT [OUIPMEWT. 

IOJ ~IRCRAFT L~UNCH I RECQUE~V EOUIP~ENT, 

106 ~!"TEOIWLOGICAL l:OUIP~ENT 

107 OTH~R PKOIOGI<APHlC EOIJJP"EMT. 

109 AIIIOOFUtE HJN[ COUNHRMEASURES. 

114 AUIATIIIN SUPPORT fCUJPN[WT. 

TIJTAl. ~VU.TIO~ SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

170 

BUDGET CO~MITTEE 

~fQU~ST RECOH~ENDEV 

QTY .o.HOUIIT QTY ~ftOU~T 

H,410 14.~10 

20.8JO 20.1130 

H,H5 ,._,.5 

11,057 11 ,061 

51 .e~~ 5~,9'4 

IJ,216 11 ,453 

272.078 233.411 

4,359 4,369 

I ,40~ 1,40:1 

110. 1es 11)9,266 

'" "' 11,502 11 .M2 

2,967 <,Q6T 

2. 326, 8(~ 2.2~9.:1~1 

1a2,94e 182,9(6 

47,944 41.944 

76,UJ 55.738 

12.515 12,575 

1. 41~ 1 ,41~ 

;!3,15< 23,152 

52.5&5 45,705 

397.270 JU,47~ 

C"--NGE FRDI1 

REOL.IEST 

QTY .0."0\IIIT 

-2,99& 

·1,500 

-87,554 

-<7. 795 
O~ONMCE SUPPO~T [QI/IP~£NT 

SHIP GUN S~STE/1 EQUIP~J;NT 

II~ S~IP GU~ SYSTEMS EOU!P~ENT. 

SMIP lllSSlLE SYSH~S EO\JIPHENT 

118 SHIP "lSSlLE SUPPORT EOIJIPHENT 

1<3 TD!\AIIA~K SUPPORT EO!JIP~E:~T 

FaH SUPPORT tOUIPHENT 

126 STI<.AHGIC "ISSI"E SYSTEHS EQUIP. 

AS\ol SVPPORT EOUIPHENT 

HT SS~ COIIBAT CONTROL SYSTEHS 

126 AS\1 5U!>PORT EQUIPH£NT 

OTili'R OROII.o.l;CE SIJPPORT EQU!PHENT 

1l2 EXPLOSIVE MON ... NCE DISPOSAL EQUIP, 

I 3l ITEHS LESS ltiM SS lllLLION 

OlltER EXf>£110ABLE O~ONAr.ICE 

131 TRAII/1/IG OE~JCE HOCS 

TOUL. ORON.I.HCE SUPPORT EQUIPI1EWT 

CIVIL EHG!IIEERtNO S\IPPORT EOUt~ENT 

136 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES. 

1JQ GEN£1\Al PURPOSE TRUCKS 

14D ~D~STRUCT!O~ & 'IAINHNANCE ED\llP. 

141 FIRE FIG"Tl~G f~UI~ENT 

14~ HCTICAl VE~IClES 

141 A~PHl810U! EOUIP~ENT. 

144 POclUTION CONTROL EOUIPMEN~ .. 

14~ lHHS U~OER $~ HH-LION 

14& PN'r'Sinl SHUR!H YfH1(1 fS 

TOTAL. ClHl EMClNEERl~C SuPPORT EOUIPHENT 

SUPPlY 3UPPORT ED\l1PHEHT 

147 MHRJALS HA~OlUC E0U1:PHENT 

143 OTHER SUPPLY SIJPF'ORT E0U1:PH~NT. 

149 fiRST OHTlhATION TIIANSP<lRTATION. 

150 S!'ECIAL PURPOSE SOJPPLY SYSTEHS. 

TOTAl, SUPPLY SUPPORT £0UlPMUl 

171 

SUOGET CO~~lTHE 

HEOOEST RfCO~~EI!OEO 

OTY ... ~OUNT OlV A"'GU~T 

5,572 5,572 

165 7~9 1<1:3,570 

61 462 60.062 

22~' 832 201.832 

56.020 60.80~ 

I. ~59 1.559 

:M,OI9 20.019 

II •• ~, 10,759 

e4,0ft0 1o,en 

OS2.164 531.449 

2' ~8~ ~.:28:2 

'" '" !,~4U 6,181 

H.G21 14,~21 

'" '" 8.187 e. 1e1 

2.~42 2,942 

17,$92 16,142 

1.117 1,171 

57.254 ~~-~2 

10,1117 10,937 

10,374 ti,e7• 

5,668 5,866 

90.~21 ~~.921 

117,900 61,200 

CHANGE FROIO 

REOIJEST 

OTY AMOUNT 

_, .400 

·28,000 

-5.216 

-13,408 

-70. n~ 

-2.762 

-3.700 

·51.000 

-54,700 
172 

IOOLLAAS IN THOUSANDS) 

PEitSOHNH '-"0 COHM.ONO SUPP(lRT ECU!PM~IIT 

TRAINING O~VICES 

151 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

COI'IM~~O SUPf>ORT EOUII'I'!E~T 

1~2 COI'IMA~D SOF'f>O~T WUII'I'!E~T 

153 <OliCATTDN SUPPORT EOUTP~ENI 

15~ ~£D!C~l SOPPO~T (QU!PIIf~T 

158 CHSII <QUIP/lENT 

159 (NVTRON~fNTAL SUPPORT EQUI~ENT , 

160 PHYSICAL S€CURIH EOUIPME~T 

161 ENTERPRISE INF()I{'Io'TlON TECIINOLOGY 

1ij4 NEXT CENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE 

TOT.O.L, Pl'RSON~H AND COM llANO SUP PORI EOU!PHENT. 

TOT.o.L, Ol~ER PIIOCUIIENENT NAW 

8UIIG€T 

REQUHT 

on .ONOU~T 

n.o4s 

2~. 208 

"' 

2.634 

3.513 

J.9H 

Y,636 

21.001 

~4.9F 

97,214 

116.1M 

386 JOI 

32~.08~ 

10,!47 

~.915,8~a 

COMITIEE 

IIHON~ENDEP 

On MIOUNT 

<2,045 

••. 208 

"" ~.634 

3,513 

3.~97 

9,636 

21.001 

go,gn 

61,J1.; 

10~. 16S 

J/2.301 

32~ .084 

10.847 

5,P23.3N 

CI(.I.HG[ FROH 

REQUEST 

On MOUNT 

-4,000 

-10,000 

-14,01)(1 
173 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[ln thv1.1aartda of dollaraJ 

,_, 

3 HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE 

E;cc:ess ln&lallalion funding 

Mod1fielltlon lunch!'lg ahea<:i of need 

4 SURFACECOMBATANTHM&E 

E~ctns lostallation funding 

3 O~ER NAVIOAnON EQUIPMENT 

ANNVSN-9 proeurement allea.d of noed 

& SUB I>ERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP 

Interim contractor B'-lOPOrl r:arryo~er 

E.-00511 1nstallat1on fund~ 

1 DOG MOD 

GEDMS engmeenng services funding carryover 

Excess OEOMS DSA fundirtg 

MCSIOCS engn..eerirlg serv1ces fund'"9 carryover 

Excess MCSIDCS DSA lundin9 

Ex<::e~s CEC onRIBIIelklt'lfund,ng 

10 LHAILHO MIDLIFE 

E~r:ess power management platform OSA 1un~i09 

E•eess HVAC DSA tundon11 

12 f>OLLUTIOIII CONTROL EQUIPMENT 

R-114 p~ocurement ahead of need 

13 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

SSN-21 HM&E modern~i!lliOn growlh 

14 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

Tl-02 installaijcn ~~~growth 

1~ LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

Ma1n propulsion diesel battle spare ahead of need 

Wete~ contraCIIkllay 

Wilier ,et co& I grcwlh 

16 SUBMARINE BATTERIES 

Suppol'l growth 

17 LPO CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

HM&.E mechenocal modoficatlons ehead of ~eed 

SWAN CANES procureme!'t ahead of need 

18 OOG·100ll SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

HM&E omprovement a heed or need 

23 UNDERWATER EOO PROGRAMS 

ProduCI•mpro~emenl gmwth 

MK-18 uuv retrofit ~>18 and aneolliary &qulpment contract 

delay 

8udgel 

Req""' 

29,120 

46,431 

60,t71l 

338,589 

17,828 

12,61l7 

16,4U 

74,119 

36,205 

37,352 

49,095 

l,t98 

58,7U 

Committee 

Recamm~nded 

19,278 

-1,926 

-1,500 

28,664 

-2,456 

44,311 

-1,120 

67,221 

-3,100 _,.,, 

324,21t 

-1272 

-900 

-7.500 

-2.091 

-'2 587 

14,048 

-2.480 

-1.400 

11,81~ 

-4.677 

70,189 

-3.440 

26,742 

-5,200 

-3.866 

-1.398 

36,352 

-1,000 

4<11,662 

-2.778 

-1,755 

-2.995 

52,708 

-1,000 

-5,075 

Chgng:e from 

R:eq~.~eal 

·3,4H 

-2,456 

-1,120 

-3,719 

-14,350 

-3,8&0 

-2,481 

-4,1577 

-3,440 

-11),484 

-1,000 

·2,996 

.S,IlU 
174 

Budget commltt.e Chang• from ,_, Requott Recommended RequHI 

24 ITEMS lESS THAN$& MILLION 88,748 &2,172 ·5,976 

Mactunery plant upgrade 1nstallaMn cost growth -5,976 

27 REACTOR POWER UNITS 298,200 298,200 

Program Increase- restore CVN-73 refvehng 298.200 

30 STANDARD BOATS 129,784 1H,446 -a,:ue Medium warl<boal C{lr>tract delay -1.776 

Larg8fo'oe protect•on boat conlracl ~lay -791 

7M RIB co~trect de Illy -m 

34 LCS MODULES 37,413 31,317 -8,096 

MPCE cost gro'Nih ·1,025 

MK-50 gun trajnmg 1ystem growth ·2,500 

SUW support and shipping coo\airJer cost grOWih ·2,570 

36 LC.S ASW MISSION MODULES 2,729 -2,728 

ASW contamere ahead ol11~ -2.729 

37 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES 44,208 36.302 -9,9011 

Gun mod~la cost growih -6,108 

Man~me &eCI.Inly modvta coat growth -2.798 

40 SPQ-98 RADAR 26,007 215,738 -1,272 

Penseope dt!tection ar.d disenm•n~~toon k•l co:~-t ~t•ow!h ·1,272 

41 ANISQQ-119 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM 7t,802 78,80~ -1,000 

CSSOT growth -1,000 

f2 SSN ACOUSTICS 16{;,65! 180,1il3~ -4,723 

Virginia class hull sensor grow1h -1,\23 

fB-34X ct~nlrad delily -3,600 

43 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 9,487 4,663 -4,124 

Sonar Window COI"~r~ct del a~ ... 924 

48 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM 24,221 22,121 -1,600 

CSA COI"Vers•on !!fowl~ -1,500 

51 ANISLQ-32 214,682 1 i6,002 -1S.,680 

Bloel< JT m$l~llalion funding ahead of need -6,450 

Blocl< 2 elecrronic support system cost growth -6.326 

SUpport tundmg ~rryover -2.602 

52 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT 124,862 123,352 -1,600 

SuPPOrt fl.lndmg carryover -1.500 

64 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG 45,H2 38,9J8 -8,424 

BPS-15118 support -1.1:37 

ICADF insl~ll~l!ioo coal growth 

BlQ-10 procuremenl ahead of need -6,983 "'"' 60 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 42,101 40,499 ·U09 

Aft dec~ equipment upgrade growth -1,000 

ANISQQ-32 •nlegreMn 0031 growth -609 

86 OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT 48,122 44.1)58 ·2,064 

Bm instellll\1011 k1t etlsl growth -2.064 
175 

SP5-73 recl1refresh cost growth 

E~cess ROAR tMtall&~ ~it funding 

Support fundin<;; carryovo 

Program increase- three R 

HOR anteMe cost growth 

Seawoll CSRR installat11m eo&t growt 

Los Angeles CSRR mcdifrca!IOn cost g 

91 SATElliTE COMMUNICAT10NS SYSTEMS 

Commerc•al broadband modlft<:altons ahead o 

92 NAVY MUL TIBANO TERMINAL 

Shrp term•nal procurement ahe!ld of nee<.J 

Termrnal cost gi'OI'IIh 

95 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 

COMSEC installation C0$1 growth 

Support fundrng c;urywt.r 

103 AIRCRAn SUPJ'ORT EQUIPMENT 

light•ng ECP growth 

ADMACS rnetellalton ahead of need 

Aviation d'ta waro~oi/S(I env~ron 

F~el systems array cost growth 

JHMCS cost growt'l 

ALIS produc.llan engmeeron "'"'" 

I( SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

TEIJIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP 

SSI mcremen1 \J relra&hlr!!des.gn (laundler) growth 

SSI•ncr&ment 8 (navigaiiOOI eng•ll!M!!nng and Mlsl phaSing 

I 

Budget 

Requast 

J.U01 

8,313 

"5,~3 

S1,U1 

152,156& 

166,769 

61,462 

229,132 

Committee 

Recommended 

28,543 

-2,135 

-1,323 

-2..900 

•J,19D 

13,312 

64,954 -2,1598 

·1,974 

43< 

490 

11,453 -1,766 

-1.765 

233,417 -38,869 

-26.400 

-10.259 

109,266 -1,501) 

-1.264 

-1.500 

6~.738 -:O,t-46 

-1.000 

-9.530 

-1,596 

-B,B19 

'5,70! ~ .... -2,385 

-22,1H 

-2,917 

-1,873 

60,062 

-1,400 

20i,832 

-3.000 

-25,000 

'-

!NSEHT IIi;•;-.~.,.- 1";b ,, 

A"1'f'r·,\~r~ FT-\-(1 r~ 
Budget Committee Change from 

P-1 Request Recommended Request 

72 ID SYSTEMS 34,901 28,543 -6,358 

MK-XII mode-5 procurement ahead of need -2,135 

TACAN upgrade procurement ahead of need -1,323 

Support funding carryover -2,900 

79 RADIAC 8,343 5,153 -3,190 

DT-702 dosimeter card contract delay -1,328 

APD contract delay -1,862 

84 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 45,053 58,365 13,312 

SPS-73 tech refresh kit cost growth -5,588 

Excess ROAR installation kit funding -1,700 

Support funding carryover -1,100 

Program increase - three ROAR upgrade kits 21,700 

90 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 67,852 64,954 -2,898 

HDR antenna cost growth -1,974 

Seawolf CSRR installation cost growth -434 

Los Angeles CSRR modification cost growth -490 

91 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 13,218 11,453 -1,765 

Commercial broadband modifications ahead of need -1,765 

92 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL 272,076 233,417 -38,659 

Ship terminal procurement ahead of need -28,400 

Terminal cost growth -10,259 

95 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 110,766 109,266 -1,500 

Support funding carryover -1,500 

103 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 76,683 55,738 -20,945 

Lighting ECP growth -1,000 

ADMACS installation ahead of need -9,530 

SRU(KU)-4 installation funding carryover -1,596 

SRU(KU)-4 procurement ahead of need -8,819 

114 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 52,555 45,705 -6,850 

Aviation data warehouse environment cost growth -2,385 

Fleet systems array cost growth -1,805 

JHMCS cost growth -2,160 

ALIS production engineering growth -500 

118 SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 165,769 143,570 -22,199 

Configuration engineering growth -2,000 

Support funding growth -2,202 

Surface combat systems center growth -7,000 

SSDS conversion kit cost growth -6,207 

SSDS covnersion kit installation cost growth -2,917 

SSDS conversion kit DSA ahead of need -1,873 

123 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 61,462 60,062 -1,400 

Support funding carryover -1,400 

126 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP 229,832 201,832 -28,000 

SSI increment 13 refresh/redesign (launcher) growth -3,000 

SSI increment 8 (navigation} engineering and test phasing -25,000 
176 

Budget Committee Change from 

P-1 Requnt RecDmmettded Requ-.t 

U7 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS 86,02il 80,1104 -15,216 

6881104 •n;tpUation eo•t growth ·5.216 

1» ITEMS LESS THAN U MilliON 11,251 10,759 ~" tndustrlaltacil•~es contract delay ~" 

138 TRAINING DEVICE MODS 84,080 70,872 ·13,408 

&riace rnioor rnoo:lifeatior\S Orowth ~.000 

CIATgrowth -4,500 

Submarin~ training device cost growth .<1,908 

140 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 8,9<19 6,187 -2,762 

Crane previously eppropriated -2,762 

US ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION 17,692 16,142 -1,450 

Emergency response truck cost growth -1,450 

148 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 10,374 6,674 .J,roo Navy cash program growlt1 ·3.700 

150 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS 90,921 39,921 -51,000 

Cta~ifo11d adju$tment -51,000 

160 PHYSICAl.. SECURITY EQUIPMENT 94,$&7 9o,&57 

1\ulomate-;j gates growth -4,000 ··"' 

164 NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE 118,165 108,186 ·10,~ 

NGEN 1~ refresh growth -10.000 
177 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ................ .................... .. ................ $1,240,958,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ....................... 983,352,000 

Committee recommendation .............................. 927,232,000 

Change from budget request ................ ................... -56,120,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $927,232,000 for 

Procurement, Marine Corps. The total amount recommended in the 

bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
" 

" 

" 

" 

Pl!QCUREKENT IIARINE CORPS 

WE:Ai'O~S AND CONBH VE~IClES 

TRACKED COH!MT VE"lCLES 

AAV7A1 PlP 

LAV PIP 

~~TILLERY A~O OTHER ~APOHS 

E~PEOtTJONA~Y ."IRE SUPPORT SYSTEM 

1~5M l!GHT'JEIGHl TOioEO WOWlllf.R .. 

H!Gil HQBTLTTY ARTILLERY ROCKET SVSHH. 

178 

(DOLLARS IS T~OUS.OMOS) 

BUOOET 

~EQIJEST 

QTY Jti!OUifT 

16.756 

n.na 

~. H2 

'-~J2 

19,474 

WE:APOIIS ANO CO'IQAT VEHICLES UNOER $' Htll!ON .. 7.250 

OT~ER SUPP{)RT 

HDOJF!CATIOH lOTS 21 ,909 

\IEAPOWS EHI!IliiC~HE~l PROGRAM. 3,108 

TOTAL, \;EAPONS MIO COHHAT HH!CLES .. 156.607 

GUIDED MISSILES -'MID EOOTPHEH 

GUIDED HISSil.ES 

GROUNO ftAS~O AIR OEFEMSE. 31,439 

JAVELIN '" fOLLOW ON 10 SIIAW 4,995 

ANTI-ARMOR WEAPO!jS SYSTtH-HE.I.I'Y (MW$-H). 1' 58!1 

OTHER $UPPIJ!Il 

~DlflCATlO~ ~ITS. s. 13• 

TOT~L, GUIDED ~ISSlLES AND EQ\JIP"E"T .. 43,500 

CQ~HJHE~ 

RECOM~ENOEO 

QTY A'IOUNT 

1~,3~5 

ae. ns 

"' 4,532 

111,~74 

7,2~ 

20.1!09 

3,208 

138,007 

30.339 

'" 

4,995 

1.5811 

~. 13. 

~2.400 

CHAIIGE HOft 

R~DL!EST 

OTY AftOU~T 

·11_000 

-5,100 

_, ,100 

-18,600 

-1' 100 
...................... ····- ·················-

CD~HUNlCAliONS AND ELECUOMICS EOUIPHENT 

COMHAHD AIIO COHTMl $Y5HHS 

" COIIIIAT OI'EI!I!TIONS CENTU. 

" COMON AV1AT10N C~i'IANO ANO CO~TRQL SYS 

~EPAU AND TEST EQUIAAEHT 

" REPAIR AHO TEST EDUIP!IE~T 

OTHER. SUPPr:RT (TH) 

" (OHBAT SUPPQRT SVSTEH 

COH~A~C AND CO~T~Ol 

" lTE~S UNDER SS ~llllO~ (COHH ~ HEC) 

'" AlR OPEF!AllONS C2 SVSTEH5 

R.O.OAR • EQUIPMENT INON-TH) ,, RADJ\R SYSHHS 

n G~OUfoi()JAlR T.O.SK OR.I~UEO RAO~R 

" RD-21 "~ 

:HTEUICOHH EOI.I!PHEHT {HOH·TSL) 

" F!RE SUPPOH SYSTE". 

" l~TELLICEHCE SUPf'<IRT EQUlf>ftENT • 

'" RQ-11 UAV 

" DCGS-KC 

OT~E~ C()II"•ElEC EQUIP"E~T (MON·THI 

" Ml~HT V!$!0M EQUIPMENT 

" NEXT GE~E"-ATIC* EUE~PI'IISE NEn.oi1K (NGENI 

OTHER SUPPORT (!ION· TEl) 

" COM~ON COKPUTE~ RESOURCES .. 

" CO~MA~Q POST SYSHMS 

" ~ADIO I;VSTEKS 

" CO"M SI<HC"IIIG I CONTROL SYSTEnS .. 

" COP~~'! I ElEC JNFRilS'RUCl\lRE S\JPP~T 

CLA$SIFJEO PIIOOIV.KS. 

TOTAL, C~KUMlCATIONS AN!! EUCf~O~ICS E!IUIPnENT 

179 

SUOGET COIInlTHE 

MEQIJOH RECDHII'Efi'DEO 

OTY IJIIJIINT OTY AIIOUNT 

CH~HGE F~OM 

~EQ\!EST 

aTY A~UHT 

············································· 

9,1T8 Y, lla 

12,;!72 12,211 

:.10.591 27 .~91 .],000 

i',J85 2,385 

,,205 4.205 

e 002 !,002 

19.595 I~, 925 -4,610 

U.230 Ql, 730 ·T ,500 

10 5es Ge. oss ·2,5~ 

11 .815(1 11.660 

·~.~40 42.550 _, ,190 

2.737 2.nr 

~.620 20.820 

9.798 7.338 ·2,46C 

2.013 2.073 

n.s1o 3l.&7Q 

36. 18E 3&,186 

U,4RA U.4~4 

72.9~~ 63.958 ·9,000 

43.J11 JT.817 -~.,00 

2.498 2,4D6 

692.H2 556.052 M.420 
SUPPORT VEHICLES 

AO!I!NJSnAT!YE VEHICLES 

" CGII~EF!<:IAL ~ASSEHGER VEHICLES. 

" CO!IH~RC!Al CAilGO nHICUS 

T.OCT!CAL VE~ICLE$ 

., ~14T TRUC~ HHI'.WV [MYP) 

.. ~01011 TAANSPO~T HODinCHIO!IS .. 

.. JOI!;T UGHT Tl,CTlCAL \ll'H!CL~ 

" F~NllY OF TACTICAL TAMLERS 

orH~II. sur,on .. llEHS LESS TH~N $5 ~IU.lON 

TOTAL, SUPPORT YEHICltS 

tHGl~EER ~NO IJTHER EOUIP!IE~T 

ENC!NEH AhD OTHER EOU!P!IE~T 

" ENV!RO"!IENl~L CONT~OL EQUIP ASSORT . 

" &ULK LIOU\0 EOUJPHENT. 

" CACTKAl FUH SYSHHS. 

'" ~OllER I'QU I F'HENT ASSORT tO 

" AHPI<IQIOUS SU!>PQRT £0UJPHJ:NT 

" lOP SYSTEHS 

MAHAllltS HANDI.IMG EOUIPMtHT 

" ~~YS!Cill SECURITY EQ~!Pl-IENT 

,. GMAISO~ ~OBILE E~GA EQIJI~ 

" "ATE~l~L ~AHOLI~ EOUIP . 

" F:AST OEST1~AH0~ TJIANSP(IIITATIOft 

~tHERAL P~OPE~Y 

" nAJHING DEVICES . 

" CONTAINER fAMILY . 

'" F~ll.Y Of CONSTRUCTION EOUIP~ENT .. 

0TH~A SUP90RT 

" ITCHS lESS THAN 15 MilliON .. 

T~TitL, E"GINEER AND OT~EA EQUIPMENT. 

" SPAAE5 AND REPAIR PARTS. 

TOTill, PROCURE'IElfl, liAR IN~ COR?S .. 

180 

IDDll~RS IN THDUS.o.HIIS) 

tiUOCU CO!I!IlTTEE 

R~OIJEST RECOH~ENDED 

01'1 MOUNT CrY ~~OU~T 

"' "' 11 ,03~ 11.0J5 

57 .<5~ 57' 2~5 

"" "' 1.~00 7.~00 

10.179 10.179 

11,023 11 ,023 

95,26~ ~8' 2ft~ 

... .. . 1 .2!8 1,258 

3.150 J, 750 

B 9~5 8.98~ 

4 ~18 ~.41~ 

6 528 6,S2B 

26 ~10 26,~10 

t 910 1 ,g10 

6.8~1 5.807 

'" '" 3.412 J,412 

, .~6~ t .662 

3.669 3.6&S 

4.272 ~.212 

!6,J01 76,301 

1S.l10 16,210 

981,352 9l7,232 

CHANG£ F~OH 

REQUEST 

OTY MWJU~T 

·56. 120 ·~~noun•~ ~nnnn<~•~u•-=•~ 

' 
,_, 

' 

' 

" 

" 

" 

" 

" 

,, 

" 

" 

181 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL AOJUSTMENTS 

[In thou111nde of do Ill~] 

Budget Committee 

ReqUHt Recommende-d 

A.AV7A1 PIP 16,756 15,356 

Productiot1 &ngillli!ering supper!- exooss growll'l -1-400 

lAY PIP 77,136 6S,736 

Reduce b~ st~ vehicle modifiClltions -11,000 

EXPEOI110NARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM !!i,742 .. , U!'jus!oflad program Ot•OW!h -6.100 

MODIFICATION I<ITS 21,909 20,809 

Pr~ram suppof'1 - e~ceu growth ·1,100 

GROUND BASED AIR DEfENSE 31,439 30,339 

SLEP contr11ct dele~ and unit cost increase -1.100 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 3[1,591 27,591 

Carryover of pnor y11ar lund& -3,000 

RADAR SYSTEMS 19,595 14,92S 

Suatainmenl . untustofied growth -4,670 

GROUND /AIR TAS!< ORIENTED RADAR 89,230 81,130 

Lot 2 systems e<"g•ne'i!fing- ucass growth -7.500 

RQ-21 UAS 70,54>5 6B,06!!i 

Product eng,neerlng rrupporl · exceH gi'OW!h ·2,500 

INT£lliGENCE SUf>PORT EQUIPMENT 44,340 42,5511 

Unil cosl increare -830 

Unil oosl•ncrease -960 

NIGHT ~SION EQUIPMENT 81,718 7,338 

Carryove-r of prior yeer funds ·2,460 

COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL $YSTEMS 71,956 63,956 

Unjus11fied program growth ·9,000 

COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT 43,311 37,817 

lnslallation costs . ellcess growth ·5.!!00 

Cllange from 

Re!:f:!Ht 

-1,400 

-11,000 

-5,100 

-1,100 

-1,100 

•• ooo 

-4,670 

-7,500 

-1,500 

·1,790 

·1,460 

·9,000 

·5,50(1 
182 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ...................................... $10,379,180,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ................................ . ..... ..... 11,542,571,000 

Committee recommendation ........... ........................................... 12,046,941,000 

Change from budget request ..................................... +504,370,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $12,046,941,000 

for Aircraft Procurement, Air Force. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
183 

[0011.-.RS I~ IHOUS.O.NDS] 

BUDGET Cf:IM"lTTEF ~EOOEST RECO~~ENOEO 

on MQUNT '" AMO~T A"OUNT 

.0.1~ FORCE 

" 3.551.0~6 " ., •224,000 

291,880 

3.844.92t +2U. 000 

1,~82,68~ 

482,396 

140,000 

HC-130J .. J32.024 

HC-I:WJ 50.000 

~C-130J. 1QQ,Q71 

MC-IJQJ, 60.000 ao, ooo 

lOT~l. ~IRLIFT l.!RCAAI'T 2,858,076 1.ase.016 

OTHf~ AUCRAFT 

HEliCOPTERS 

CV-2l OS~EY. 15,000 +1~.000 

~:SSION SUPOORT .O.IRCIO.AFT 

" ClVJL ~IR PATROl AIC 2.561 10.400 <7,83~ 

OTWER A.!RCRAH 

" TMGH OROUS " 98.576 

" AC 130J 

" RQ-4 UAII so.•n 

•• HQ-& . " " 3Tl,218 .. •133' 000 

TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT. 551,670 •155,636 
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

TACTICAL FORCES 

F-35. 

2 F-35 (AP-CY). 

TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT. 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

OTHER AIRLIFT 

3 KC-46A TANKER. 

4 C-130J. 

5 C-130J ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY). 

6 HC-130J. 

7 HC-130J. 

8 MC-130J. 

9 MC-130J ... 

TOTAL, AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT. 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

HELICOPTERS 

CV-22 OSPREY. 

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 

12 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C. 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

13 TARGET DRONES. 

17 AC-130J. 

16 RQ-4 UAV. 

18 MQ-9 .. 

TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT. 

detai 1 gpo (PROC) (no 1 i ne no)(OOC 

26 3,553,046 

291 ,880 

------------

3,844,926 

7 1,582,685 

7 482,396 

140,000 

4 332,024 

50,000 

2 190,971 

80,000 

------------ 2,858,076 

- Filters: I, G DE PROC 

COMMITTEE 

RECOMMENDED 

QTY AMOUNT 

28 3,777,046 

291,880 

------------

4,068,926 

7 1,582,685 

7 482,396 

140,000 

4 332,024 

50,000 

2 190,971 

80,000 

------------

2,858,076 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

QTY AMOUNT 

+2 +224,000 

----------------.--- +224,000 

--------------------

6/11/2014 10:03 AM Page: 31 
HODJFICATIC)Ij OF I~SERYIC~ AIRCRAFT 

STRATI:GJC .O.UICRAH 

" 8-;?A. 

,, a-•a. 

" ~-52 

" LARGE AJ~AAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES. 

TACHCAL Al~CRAFT 

" F-1 ~ 

" F-1~ 

" F·22A. 

" F-~5 ~OPHICATIOIIS 

" !~CREftE!(T 3. 2b . 

AT~LTFT AIIICAAFT 

" C-5. 

" c-:M 

" C-17A .. 

" C·:ll. 

" C·32A 

" C-31~. 

HAINER AIRCRAFT 

" ~l!O~R ~005 . 

" " 

'" ' ' T-l6 

184 

(OOLL'IRS IN THflUSA~OS) 

SUtiGET CO!I~JTIEE 

~EOOEST ~ECQ!1!1£10EO 

OTY A~UNT OTY MOUNT 

:ll.865 24,365 

140.25:1 140,252 

180.148 180.148 

13.159 13.159 

381.314 4U,3H 

12.336 9.0~2 

1 ~0, JOT 18'l,201 

IB7 ,&46 156,148 

~6' soo 2~-~0 

14.751 H,TJI 

331,466 331 .•66 

127.4~4 89' 394 

'" '" 3,n7 4, reT 

18,4~7 "' 

"' "' H,48! ,. ,480 

1,65{) 7,650 

34. 64~ 28,84& 

CHA~GE FRO" REO~~T 

OlY /IHO\INT 

·~· 

+111.000 

-31.500 

·38.100 

-4,(100 

·18.000 

-a,aoc 
OTHER AIRCRAfT 

.. KC·lOA (ATCA) . 

" C·12 

.. Vt-2!>1. MOP .. 

.. c -~0 

00 C-130 

" C130J H(!C$ .. 

" C-135 . 

" CO•PASS CAL-L KOOS 

" ~C-135. 

" ,., 

" E-•. 

" AIR60R~E WARNINO A~D Cl.INTROL- S'fSJEK .. 

" FAMILY OF BEYOHO LlHf·OF·S!GHT TFRHJNALS 

" "' 

" H-60 

" RO • 4 U.O.V HODS 

., HCIHC-!JO HOOJFJCJITIONS 

.. OTHER AIRCRAFT . 

"' HQ·l IIOCS 

.. ~-9 HODS 

.. cv-22 noes 

TOtAL, HOOlFlCATIO~ OF INSERVlCE AJRC~~FT 

"JRCAAFT SPARES oUIO REPAIR PARTS 

" IN!Tli\L SPARES/REPAIR PARTS 

lOlAL, .&.!RCAAH S~~RE9 ANO ~E~AU ~ARTS. 

185 

BUOGET CDKK!ITEE 

RfOIIEST RECOIIK~NOI:D 

CITY .t.IIOUMT OTY AHOUNT 

3~' ~13 71,~1~ 

1.960 1 ,9(;0 

1,072 , ,012 

1 -~92 3.292 

J5.seg 10i,671 

! 919 1,~19 

63.~69 63,568 

51.528 67.616 

152.748 16:!,3~6 

16 491 16,491 

l2.341 14.691 

180.284 191,284 

32,026 

9,237 8,237 

ea. 110 eo. no 

21,354 1-1 .364 

1,902 I .902 

32,106 J2,106 

4, 755 4,755 

155,445 155,445 

H,aH H,674 

2.8~4.21\ 2 789,743 

465,5&l 4611,:;e~ 

466,SU 4~6.:;e~ 

CH.o.HGE fRO~ 

R~!lUEST 

OTV A~OUHT 

·4,0~ 

+10.600 

-7,650 

+lt ,000 

·3l.0~5 
" 

" 

" 

" 

" 

.. 

" 

" 

" 

.. 

" 

.. 

" 

AJRC~F'T S~PPORT EQUIP!1EIIT Al!tl FACH.ITIES 

COIWJ~ SUPPORT EQUIPNEio'T 

AIRCiti.F=T REPLACEUNT Sl!PPORT EQUIP 

POST P~OOUC7JON SUPPO!H 

.. ,. 

S-~2. 

C·HA .. 

tv·n POST PRODIJCTION SUPPORT .. 

C-135 . 

F-15 POST PROOUCHON SUPPORT 

F-18 POST PRODUCTION SUPPOU 

f-22.0. 

OT~H AIR!;RAFT 

INDUSTRIAL PREHREONES:S 

!NOUSTR!AL P~EPM!:ONESS. 

WAR CONSUHABLES 

WAR COIISUHABLES 

OTHER P~OUCI!ON CMI!GtS 

OTHER PF!OOUCTION CIIAROES. 

186 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

euoc:;n 

~EQOEST 

OTi' MOUHT 

12.1170 

j•.793 

5,248 

20,\10 

IG,S31 

I.IU 

, .122 

10.994 

5,~29 

" 21.363 

a2.9oe 

, .o<J>.21e 

TOT ... L. AIRCRAFT SUPPOiiT EOI.IIPHENT AND FACiliTIES. 1,243.584 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAM ~9 380 

HHill. 1\IIICRIIFT ~OCIJR£~E~l, AIR I'O~CE 11,H2 ~11 

COII~ITIH 

RECOHIIE"DEO QTY ,o.IIOUNT 

l:?,470 

14,793 

~.249 

20.110 

16,gll 

4.4H 

I, 122 

9.&94 

5,929 

" :11 ,36l 

62,906 

' 001.ne 

<•2.584 

69,380 

12.04£.941 

CHAHGf F~D~ 

~EtiUEST 

QTY AHOUNT 

·I ,000 

-1,000 

•W4.370 ~~nn:oUU ••n::uO•u,..:::o:o 
187 

EXPLANAnoN OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In lhoutand• of dollar.] 

Budget Committee Chlm~;~e from ,_, Requeat Reo;ommend.cl RagtiHt 

F-35 3,553,046 3,717,04(1 3,717,046 

Add lw<lii"CrQH 224,000 

" CV-22 H!i,OOO 1!J,OOO 

CV-22 umque modlfica!Hlns 15.000 

" CIVIL AIR PATROL AIRCRAFT 2,561 10,400 7,$38 Program 111crease 7,838 

18 MQ-9 240,218 373,218 133,000 

Add 12aircraft 155,000 

Uni1 savin9s trom higher quanllt"!' -22,000 

20 B-2A 23,865 24,365 

EHF increment 1 field installs -2,000 '" 

Ej&clton seat saletylsustainability im11rovement program 2.500 

" F-15 387.314 493,314 111,000 

Joint Helmet Mounted Cue•!1g System- unjuattr.eo growlh 4,000 

In other govemmtm\ C051& 

AESA radars fen A.Jr National Guard 11!1.000 

" F-18 12,336 9.042 .J,Zt4 Falcon STAR ear1y to need -1 .29-t 

Adv;nced Data Transfer Equipment -2.000 

20 F-35 MOOS 187,646 156,146 -31,500 

Concurr~tney estimates -31,500 

" C-17A 127,494 89,3S4 -38,100 

E~<ecutoon !ldjvslm&nl -38.100 

" C-32A 8,787 4,787 -4,000 Wideband SATCOM- roq.,irement not defir.eO 4.000 

" C-37A 18.457 "' -18,000 

Wod111band SATCOM . rlllq\.loremt~nl not defined -18,000 

" T-38 34,546 28,845 -8,000 Pacer Ill Classic •nst~lllunds early to need -6,000 

" I<C-10A 34,313 17,513 43,200 CNS/ATM \o;its t~nd installs 43.200 

" c...o 7,292 3,292 -4,000 

Wideband SAT COM - rectuirement not defined 4.000 

" C-130 35,669 109,$71 73,802 

Propellef upgrade wooo T-56 3.5 engone mod1ficet10n 22,600 

C-130 Avionics Modernization program 35,800 

CNSIATM minomtze program -14,598 

,. RC-135 152,746 163.3-46 10,&00 

8a$elina program shortfall 10.600 
188 

,_, 

56 E-4 

Low FreQuency Transmk Syetem 

AEHF lerminai/PNVC fund9 early lc ne!td 

58 AWACS 

Program increase 

59 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE OF SIGHT TERMINALS 

FAB-T t~rmnal NRE fund8 early to need 

82 F-16 

Producl•cn line ,hlit<lowr>- unpblig~;~tfl'd pria< year funds 

Budget 

Re9ueat 

22,341 

160,284 

32,028 

10.994 

Committee Change from 

Recommended Requ•t 

14,691 -1,SSO 

-5,250 

-2.400 

191,284 31,000 

31,000 

0 ..J2,026 

-32,026 

'·"' ·1,000 

-1.000 
189 

CV-22 

The Air Force's fiscal year 2015 request does not include funds 

to procure additional CV-22 Osprey aircraft, and the Committee 

understands that the Air Force currently has no plans for future 

procurement of CV-22s. The last CV-22 will deliver in December 

2016 and leave the Air Force with a fleet of 50 aircraft, equivalent 

to what the Air Force has identified as the medium risk program 

of record. Future operational losses would require the Air Force to 

accept an increasing level of risk to the CV -22 mission. The Air 

Force already has suffered two such losses, one on overseas deploy· 

ment in April 2010, and one during a training mission in June 

2012. These lost aircraft were replaced with additional funds pro· 

vided by Congress. The Committee understands that while other 

variants of the V-22 will remain in production for some time, and 

that the variants possess a high degree of commonality, there are 

certain CV-22-unique modifications, such as the multi-mode radar, 

that are at risk of falling out of supply if the Air Force or foreign 

military sales do not generate additional orders for CV-22 aircraft. 

Therefore, the Committee recommendation includes an additional 

$15,000,000 to protect the CV-22 fleet against undue risk from diminishing manufacturing sources for unique parts and modifications. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to 

prioritize those end-items that have a long lead time for production 

and are at the greatest risk for loss of supply should those produc· 

tion lines shut down with the delivery of the last Air Force CV22 currently funded. The Committee directs the Secretary of the 

Air Force to submit a report to the House and Senate Appropria· 

tions C!liilmittees not later than 60 days after the enactment of this 

Act that details an expenditure plan for these funds. 

KC-10 

The Air Force has indicated that should spending limits con· 

tained in current law remain in force in fiscal year 2016, it will 

propose to retire the entire fleet of 59 KC-10 tanker aircraft by fiscal year 2020, saving an estimated $2,300,000,000 over the future 

years defense program. The Committee believes that eliminating 

the KC-10 fleet poses a serious risk to the Air Force's ability to 

carry out one of its stated core missions, that of providing global 

reach for the armed forces. The KC-10, with its ability to deliver 

150,000 pounds of fuel at a range of 4,400 nautical miles using 

both the boom and drogne methods, is a critical element of providing the air bridge to combatant commanders across the Atlantic 

and Pacific Oceans. 

The Committee urges the Secretary of the Air Force to be more 

forthcoming about the operational impact of retiring the KC-10 

fleet, a proposal which appears to be driven primarily by the Air 

Force's stated preference for "vertical cuts" that eliminate entire 

fleets and their associated infrastructure to achieve the requisite 

level of savings under current law and Department of Defense policy. Current acquisition plans for the KC-46 will not provide an 

adequate replacement for the KC-10, since the Air Force already 

plans to replace the older fleet of KC-135s with KC-46s on a one· 

for-one basis. The Committee notes that tbe House-passed National 
190 

Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2015 prohibits the Air 

Force from taking any action toward divestment of the KC-10 fleet 

and requires the Commander of the United States Transportation 

Command to submit an operational risk assessment and mitigation 

strategy to the congressional defense committees along with any 

proposal to divest the KC-10 fleet in the fiscal year 2016 budget. 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .... $4,446,763,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request 4,690,506,000 

Committee recommendation . 4,546,211,000 

Change from budget request ................. - 144,295,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,546,211,000 

for Missile Procurement, Air Force. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
191 

[OOUAMS IN T~OUS~HDSI 

BUDG~l COM!nEE 

~HlUfST RECOM~E~EO 

OT'f MOU~T OlY ~IIOUNT 

HISS!~E PROCUREHlNT, AIR FORCE 

BALUST!C HISSILES 

H!SSIU' ~~PIACE:HENT FQI.IlPHE:NT · U!LISHC 

HISSILE REPLACEHEHT EQ-BJ\UISHC. ao. 1n ao, 187 

OTHER H!SSIL.ES 

TACTICAL 

JOI~T AIR-SURFACE 5TMI00Ff Hl5SlLE (JASS~) '" J37 .~38 '" J37,4JB 

SlOE>IINpUI. [AI~· ~X I '"' 1lZ 995 "' 1J:>,!I9~ 

AH~M "" n&.Goo "' 329,600 

PREOATH ~EllflRE HlSSILE '"' J3 H78 "' J3:978 

SH~I.L O!AHETER ~0~8. "' 70.578 "' !8.047 

" PREFERRED ~UN!TIONS. 10.000 

lMOUSnJAL FI,CTLITIES 

lHOUSTR!AL PREPAAEOHESS/POUUTlOH PREVEHTIOII. "' "' TOTAL, Ol"ER H!SSILES 90~.238 862.707 

HOOJFICAT!O~ Of IHSI:IIVTCE HJSS!LfS 

ClASS IV 

HH 111 HOOif!C.O.TlOHS 28,H7 29.471 

" .O.G~-650 H~VFRTC~ "' "' 

" AOH-6911 kUH "' "' 

" AIR l.O.UNCH Clru!SE ~JSSJLE .. 1G,O!l IG.0&3 

" SHA\.l OJ.oJI[HR MI~S .. s,gH 6.~2· 

TOTAl, HOOlflCATlON OF INSeRI{[CE KISSHES. 52.0~1 52.051 

C~~NGF FROII 

REQIJEST QTV AHOUNT 

·62.531 

+10,000 

-41,531 
SPAAES -...o REPAIR P~RTS 

" !NJTIN,. SP~RESIREPJtJR PA.RTS 

liTHER SIJPPORT 

SPM:E PIWGR.O.IIS 

" .O.OVIINCED EHF 

" \llt:li:H .. ND GAPFILlU S.O.TEl.LH~S. 

" GPS Tl I !'.PACE S<GIIENl 

" Gl'S Ill SUCE SEGMENT (AP·CY) 

" SPACEBO!iNE EQ!!IP ICO"SEC) 

'" GLIIIIAL PDSI\JO!jJHG (SP ... CEI 

" DEf NEHDR01.0G!CAL SAT PROG (SP ... CE). 

" EVOL>'EO EXPEIID"-BLE LAUIICH nH I SPACE). 

" EVOlVED E~PEHDMLE lAUNCH VEH INFRJ\STROCTURE 

" SS!A ~IG~ !SPACE! 

SPECIAL PRO~RANS 

" 5PECI"l UPOAH PROGP..lHS. 

TOT.O.L, 01HE~ SUPF'URT., 

ClASSlFHO Pi!QGR~HS . 

TCTI>L, "lSSILE PROCUREHEMl, I>IR FORCL 

192 

(DOLlAAS 1~ THOU!N'.NDS) 

(SPI.Cf). 

BUDGH 

REQOJEST 

orv ~~ou~T 

57,366 

29~ .690 

J8,9il 

23~. 307 

~1.000 

16.201 

52,090 

81,000 

830.903 

150,HJ 

'~0.81~ 

80.119 

i,BH.6~8 

saa.ooo 

~.sg0,506 

CO~NlTIEE 

REC~"ENDED 

QT'I' I>HOU~ 

87,366 

298.8E10 

34.998 

235,397 

H,OOO 

10,50Q 

so.ooo 

18.000 

6:y:),90~ 

71S, 14S 

444,8a4 

GO. 11g 

1. ~·~ ,89-1 

818,000 

4.546.211 

CM~NGE FROM 

UQUEST 

QTY AIIQUNT 

-3.973 

•30,000 

·5.101 

-:1,090 

-9,000 

-35.00<1 

-6,000 

.~1.1e• 

·70,000 

.144, 21i~ 

•~•••••n•n ...... nn••=~••••• 
193 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thounnd• Dl dolle>W) 

Budget Committee Change from 

'·' Requ"t Re~omrnended Requee! 

SMALL DIAMETER BOMB 70,578 18,0.7 -62,$31 

SDB II Lot 2 deferral lor program deleys -52,531 

,. PREFERRED MUNITIONS 10,000 10,000 

Program increase - ptelerred mumtion~ 10,000 

" WIOEBANO OAPFILLER SATELLITES (SPACE) 38,971 34,998 .J,973 

Exceu launch suppo!'l -3,973 

" GPS lH SPACE SEGMENT ADVANCE PROCUREMENT 57,(100 87,000 :ro.ooo Addition91 lul'lds lor aovance procurement 30.000 

" SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) 18,201 10,1!00 -6,701 

Mamtam at fiscal year 2013\evel -5,701 

" GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) 82,090 50,000 -2,090 

E!IC6Ss contract suppo~ ·2,1)g0 

DEFENSe METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE PROGRAM 

" (SPACE) 87,000 78,000 -t,OOO 

E•cess growth -9,000 

EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE 

" (INFRASTRUCTURE) 760,143 715,143 -36,000 

Excess grOWTh -35.000 

24 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) 1150,684 444,884 -8,00(1 

Un1u,nl1ed suppor1 COlli,,...,~~~ ~= 

... CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS BBB,OOO 818,000 -70,000 

Classifoed adJUStment -70.000 
194 

EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE 

The Committee is concerned with the continued changes in the 

Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program. Therefore 

the Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to provide notification to the congressional defense committees of each change to 

the EELV acquisition plan and schedule as compared to the plan 

and schedule included in the budget submission for fiscal year 

2015. Each notification shall include an identification of the 

change, a national security rationale for the change, the impact of 

the change on the EELV block buy contract and launch manifest, 

the impact of the change on the opportunities for competition for 

certified EELV launch providers, and the costs or savings associated with the change. 

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III 

The budget request includes $57,000,000 for advance procurement of the Global Positioning System (GPS) III Space Segment to 

acquire long lead items for Space Vehicle 10, including atomic 

clocks and critical bus hardware. GPS III is an acquisition program 

based on efficiencies gained through larger, predictable buys with 

insertion of evolutionary capability improvements. However, the 

budget request reduces funding for future acquisitions to one satellite per year, increasing the overall life-cycle cost of the program. 

The Committee recommendation includes $87,000,000 for GPS III 

advance procurement, an increase of $30,000,000 above the budget 

request, to restore funding for future acquisitions at the level of 

two satellites per year. 

PREFERRED MUNITIONS 

The Committee understands that the Air Force projects shortfalls 

in certain munitions based upon current inventories, procurement 

plans, and expenditure rates. In order to support Air Force readiness, the Committee recommendation includes an additional 

$10,000,000 for preferred munitions. The Committee directs that 

these funds may be reclassified by the Secretary of the Air Force 

to other line items within this account as necessary to meet this 

intent. Not less than 15 days prior to reclassifying or obligating 

these funds, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide a report 

to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees detailing the 

specific use of these additional funds. 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ........................... $729,677,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ................ 677,400,000 

Committee recommendation .. ............................................ 648,200,000 

Change from budget request . ................ ........ .................... -29,200,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $648,200,000 for 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
" 

'" 

" 

" 

" 

195 

:DOLLARS l~ T~OUSAHOS) 

PROCUREnENl Of AnHUNITIOH AIR FORCE 

PI!OCUII.EnENT OF AHnO, AIR FORCE 

I!QC~ETS . 

CARTRTOG~S 

80~8S 

PRACT!CE B()MBS 

GENE~l PURPOSE BOHBS. 

JOINT DlRC(:T ATTI.CK HUNTT!ON 

PREFERUO ~UNJT!ONS 

HARE, JR ~JU·7S 

CADIPAO 

UPLOS!VE I)I!OINMCE DISPOSAl ([001 

SPARH A~O REP~IR PARTS 

~OO!flCAf!ONS . 

1H~S USS JH,o.rj ~~ 000,000 

fVZfS 

HARES . 

FUZES 

TOTAL. PROCURE~ENT Of AMMO AIR FORCE. 

~EAP<l"S 

SMLL .O.RHS. 

TOTAL, PROCIIRE~ENT Of AHnUNIT!O~, AIR FORCE 

BUDGH 

~EOU~ST 

QT'I' A~OU~T 

~.6911 

133.211 

31 .9~ 

H8,6H 

. 2,97J 101 ,400 

29.969 

G. ~25 

... 

\ 510 

4.n1 

ea. 101 

103.~17 

6~<.1~2 

24,648 

671,400 

C~MlTlEE 

RECOHME~OEO 

OTV .IJIOV~T 

t,696 

110,911 

30,098 

1~8.614 

2,e13 101,40\l 

10.000 

29.9M 

6.925 

"' 1,610 

~ .237 

36,10\ 

5~.417 

623' 552 

24.648 

648,200 

C~~~E F~I}M 

REOUEST 

QTY AIIOUn 

.;e.JOO 

·1 ,1100 

~to,ooo 

·19,000 

·29,20C 

·29,200 ••n~•••:n: •=-=•~•~•••••<••n•• 
196 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thounnde of dollera) 

p., 

2 CARTRIDGES 

5 56mm lrang+bht ~niusbfied cosl ~rowttl 

PGU-23/U U11JU5lihed requeat 

PGU-1316 unjustofied gl"()wlh 

PA:ACTICE BOMBS 

BDU-50 unit cost growth 

Mk-84 111ert un+t coat growth 

5A PREFERRED MUNITIONS 

Program 1ncraase. preferred mun11tons 

12 FUZES 

Hard large! ~o+d sen$ing fuze produC1oo fund~ ea~y to 

need 

Budget 

Request 

133,271 

31,998 

103,417 

CommlttQ 

R&commended 

114,971 

-2.750 

-9.650 

-5.900 

30.098 

·1.000 

-900 

10,000 

10,000 

84,417 

-19.000 

Changa from 

Requelt 

·18,300 

·1,900 

10,000 

-19,00() 
197 

PREFERRED MUNITIONS 

The Committee understands that the Air Force projects shortfalls 

in certain munitions based upon current inventories, procurement 

plans, and expenditure rates. In order to support Air Force readiness, the Committee recommendation includes an additional 

$10,000,000 for preferred munitions. The Committee directs that 

these funds may be reclassified by the Secretary of the Air Force 

to other line items within this account as necessary to meet this 

intent. Not less than 15 days prior to reclassifying or obligating 

these funds, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide a report 

to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees detailing the 

specific use of these additional funds. 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation . $16,572,754,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ....... ......... 16,566,018,000 

Committee recommendation . 16,633,023,000 

Change from budget request .. +67 ,005,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $16,633,023,000 

for Other Procurement, Air Force. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
OTHER PROC~EHE!fl. AIR FOt<CE 

VEHIC\IU.R EO.UlP!IENT 

~~SSEr.IGER C.O.~IHG ~EHICLES 

PASSENGEII: CAR~!~~ 1/EH!Cl.E .. 

tARGQ • \ITJLITY \IEHICLES 

~AMIL~ NEOIUM TACTICAl VtH]ClE 

CAP VEHICLES 

ITEMS LESS ~~~~ SOH (CA.~GO) 

SPECIAL P\IRPOSE I'I"HICLES 

$ECURITY AND TACTICAl VEHICLES 

!H"S LESS THAN S~ll (SPEC!Al]. 

FIRE FIGHJNG EOUlP"ENl 

FJ~ FJGHTJNG/CRASH RESCUE 1/£HJCL(S .. 

MTERI~LS HA~DLIHG EQUIPMENT 

!HHS LHS Tfii\T 15.000.000 

tASf HAINHNANCE SUPPORT 

RUIII<IH SNOW REHO\IAl I ClEANING EO.UIP. 

'" lTEHS LE:SS THAN $~H 

TOTAL, 1/EH[CIJLAA EOUIPHENT 

HECTRO~ICS ~NO HUCOHMUNICATIONS EQUIP 

COHN SECU~ITY Elli!IP~ENT(CO~SEC) 

" CO!ISEC EQUIP~ENT,. 

" MODIF!C.O.TION$ (C:>MS~C) 

INTHUGEIICE PI\OO~~~S 

" LNTELLIGEIICE T~l~ING EQUI~ft.T 

" INTELLIGfiiCl CO!!" EQUIP. 

,. MISSION PUNNING S~nENS . 

HECTRO~ICS PROGRAMS 

" Tli!oi.FHC COMTROL/U.NDING 

,. N.O.fl~.O.I. .O.!Rs.!'.O.CE SYSHH, 

" B.O.TTlE CONTROL SYSTEM • FIXED. 

ro THEAlER AIR CONTROL SYS l~PIW. 

" WEATHER OBSE"'".O.l!ON fORECAST 

" STRHEGTC COM~ANO .O.ND CONTROl. 

" CHEYENNE M•JNTAIN CO'IPLEX 

" T~C SI'SMlT SPT 

198 

(DOLLARS I~ T~OUSANOS) 

BVOG£T COli"JnH 

RECIIESI ~ECO!I!IENDE~ 

O.TY ~HOU~I OTV AIIO\IIif 

8.~:18 6.~28 

T ,6l9 1,639 

'" 1 '700 

, 1 027 ,, .027 

4,4H ~.447 

'" '" 

10,152 10,152 

15, '08 ·~. 103 

10.212 10,2H 

51,N9 !7 ,049 

123,616 124.555 

106,18~ 91!,162 

1.363 ',303 

~.832 2.632 

3;:,323 32,329 

!5,649 15.649 

42.21,)0 2~.&18 

6.333 8,333 

2, 703 2,706 

50,()33 50,033 

16.348 10,34& 

13!i,i84 139.964 

<0,1()1 20.101 

9.060 9,060 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST O.T'!' IJIOUMT 

·1.900 
SPECI~l COMM·ELECTRONICS PIWJECfS 

<T GtH[I!Al. INFORM.O.TlOH TECHNOLOGY. 

29 MOBiliTY COMMNO .o.NO COtH~Ol. 

" AIR I'ORC£ PHYSICAl. S~tURlTV SYSTEM 

" COMBH TI!AlHliiG RAHG~S-. 

" ~IWIHU~ ESSOITlAL EMERCEIICY COM" H. 

" Cl COUHTER"EMUR!:S 

,. GCSS·A~ 1'05. 

" 0£HIISE EnERPRlSE ACCOUHTING AND MGIIT .. 

" T~E~TE~ B.O.nlE ~GT C2 SYS 

" AIR OPEIIATJOHS CfiiTfR [MIC). 

AIR FOR(:E COMMUNICATIONS 

" UFO~HATIOH TIIANSPORT SVSTEHS 

" AFNfl 

OISA PROOR-\HS 

4l SPACE BASEO lA SEWSM PilOO SPACE 

44 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE 

45 ~UOCT DETECTION SYS (NOS) SPACE 

47 SPACEl!FT RA~GE HSTFH SPACE 

49 5PI.CE MOS SPACE 

50 COUNTEAS~ACE SVSTEH 

199 

(IXlllAR$ IN T~OUSANOS) 

BUOG<T COHnlnH 

Rl:OUEST RECOil/tENDED 

OfY AMOUNT DTV MOIJHT 

3g.100 Ja.1oo 

19.010 1&.010 

11,462 11. ~E2 

JT 41ti 37,428 

26,634 2e,u4 

1 .269 1 ,:i'6S 

11 .508 11,5()8 

l,ero 3.aro 

1~' 2Q8 ~~.2M 

9 .~~~ 9.~65 

:IS, l72 25,7H 

81,286 &I ,266 

121.226 ~,928 

16.342 16.342 

60.230 ~.230 

28.100 26.100 

2,075 2,075 

4.656 4,656 

54.e3o 54,630 

s~. nl 69.713 

41.355 41.355 

31.722 31.722 

61.603 l9.203 

CMANG'E FRO" 

AlQUtST 

QTY AIIOUNT 

·10.000 
O~OANlZA'li)Jt MD BASE 

" TACTICAL C·E ~OU!PMENT. 

" RADIO i:OU!PflENT 

" CCT\IIAUOJQ~!SUAL EQUIP~f_NT . 

;; a ... SE COM~ !NFRJ,ST~UCTUAf 

MOIFICATIONS 

" COM~ HECT "ODS 

TOTAL, ELECTROMJCS .o.ND TfLECOHHUNlCJ\TIOIIS EOU!P. 

CTliH B.o.!;E MJNTENANC! MD Sl.II'PO~~ EQUIP 

P[RS~.O.L SAFET~ MID RESCUE £0\IJP 

" NICNT VlSlON OOQSlES 

" ITEMS LESS THAA M.OOO.OOO !SAFETY] 

QEPOT PLANT • f\1\TU!ALS HAIWLlNG EO 

" ~fC~AN!lED n ... TEAl.O.L MANDL LNG. 

USE SUPPORT ~OUJPHENT 

" BASE PROCURED EQUlPMENT 

" CONHI<GENCY OPERATIONS 

" PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL TNVESTnENT. 

" 'IOBILlTY OOUI""EHT 

.. Jr[~' LES~ TIWI n~ (BASE SUPPORT) 

Sl't"CIJ\L ~UPPO!IT P~JEOS 

.. OAIIP 1!1:;135 

" OlSTRISIJHO GRO\I~D SYSHHS 

.. SPECI~l UPO~T[ PROGRAH 

'" O(HNSE SPACE RECONHAISSA.r.<CE Pl<OG!IA~. 

TOTAL. OTHER BASE '1AINHNAHCE A~O SUPf'O~T EQUIP 

SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS 

" SPARES AHO R~PAlH PARTS 

ClAf>SlF!EO PROGF!AHS 

TOHL O~IIH P~OtUREHEH. AIR FORCE. 

200 

8UOCET 

IIEOUE$1 

OTY ~"OUNT 

5D.J3~ 

!4,846 

3.6JS 

19.601 

105,3!111 

1,411 ,611 

12,577 

3' .209 

1.670 

U,l25 

16,744 

z.•as 

10.573 

5.4e2 

24.710 

2U~.I43 

5P.JIO 

n.Ma 

941.~16 

l2.81l 

13.g9o.1;e 

16.566.01& 

CO"M!TIH 

~tCOM"ENDED 

OTY MOUifl' 

5(),)3~ 

U,UG 

3,5JS 

79.&07 

56.398 

,J34.BlS 

12.~17 

31 .20~ 

7,&10 

14, I ~5 

16.7U 

2.4~5 

10.57) 

s.~s2 

2~.710 

21l6.14J 

537.370 

77.898 

9•7 .,6 

32.513 

14.>9J.U4 

16.533.0<3 

CM~"GE nOll 

AEQUUT Ql'f .O.'IOUNT 

-~9'.000 

-118.982 

•;>0).2dB 

•67 .005 

~=oo•~•~=~~• •••~•n••n .... uu< 
'"' 

' 

11 

11 

" 

" 

" 

" 

... 

201 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL .-.OJUSn.tENTS 

[In tnousandl of dotluw.] 

Budget Commltt.e 

Request Recommendltd 

CAP VEHICLES '" 1(1'00 

Progral'l" mcraa~ "' COMSEC EQUIPMENT 106,182 9U82 

VACM modermzation devices unit cost l)rowth -7.900 

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYSTEMS 42,200 25,818 

O-ILS P•O\Iram restructure lund$ early io need -16,382 

AFNET 122,22:1 90,928 

Excess grolli!h -31,300 

FAMIL V OF BEYOND LINE..OF..SIGHT TERMINALS 60,ZJD ~0.230 

FAB-T award/schadule delays -10,000 

COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM 61,803 39,203 

New star1 funds excess til need -22.400 

COMM ELECT MOOS 106,398 56,398 

HEMP protection sarty to need -49.000 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 13,990,196 14,193,444 

Clau•l•eo adJustment 203.248 

Change from 

Requnt 

"' 

-1,900 

-16,382 

·31,3IXI 

-1(1,000 

-22,400 

-49,000 

203.248 
202 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation $4,240,416,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ..... ................. ................... 4,221,437,000 

Committee recommendation ... ........................ 4,358,121,000 

Change from budget request ....................... ......................... +136,684,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,358,121,000 

for Procurement, Defense-Wide. The total amount recommended in 

the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
PI!OCURE~€NT, OEFEMSE ·WIDE 

""-JOR EQU!PI\EWT 

H~JOII EOUIPHENT, ow H~JOll EQU!PHE~T IT€1\S LESS Tll.ol~ $5H 

MAJOR EOUIPHENT, oc·~ 

MAJOR EDUIPHENT. 

MAJOR EOUIPH~NT. OHRA 

PE~SON~H A~INISTRATJON 

MJO~ EQUIPMENT, DISA 

IN~ORHATION SYSHHS SECU~IT'I 

, TnEPORT PAOGR.O.H 

" ITEMS LESS THi\11 S5H .. 

" HET CENTRIC ENTE~RISE SERVICES (WCES). 

" DEFENSE INFDRHATlON SV:Snn~ NFtwllRK 

" naER SECURJTV IN!TIHIVE 

" WMIH HOUSE COHHUNICH!OM .l,(l[NC¥ 

" SEMIO!l LHOE~SI<IP ENTERP~ISE 

'" JOINT INfCII"-'.Tli!M fN~JIIflqHfMT 

HAJOR EQUJPH[IIT, '" " H~OR EOOIPHEI(l 

MAJOR ElliJlPHEHT, D"~CT 

" ' • \;E~PON $V$TEM COST 

H~JO~ EOUIP~ENT, 000£~ 

" AUTOMATIONIECUCAT!ONAL S\IPPORT l Ll)(;lSTJCS. 

" VEHICLE$ .. 

HAJDR EOUJI'HEHT, DH(NS~ URfAT REOOCTJON AGUCY 

'" VEHlClES 

" DIHtR n,o.,roR EQIJI!'IIENT., 

MAJOII EQUIPMENT. OTSA 

" 1\AJDR (QU!PMENT. 

" AEGIS BHO Atli'AOCE PA'(ICUI!EHEn .. 

HAJOR EIJU!PHOIT, ·~ " THMC SVSTEH 

'" AEGIS 6HO 

" BHDS 1>11/TPY·l RMMRS 

" AEGIS AS~ORE Pt!ASE !ll 

" l~OH llOHl SVSTEH . 

203 

BUDGET 

REQUEST 

OTY ,...DUNT 

1 ,59~ 

~' 325 

ll.ZU 

10,491 

80,622 

14 H7 

1 .9:'1 

8D. U4 

e. 755 

n. 7Jl 

32.544 

13.300 

1,438 

11' 6~0 

1.269 

1,5(JO 

, 

1,6J8 

1.0J9 

88.8-40 

" 464.424 

, ~~,,4JD 

48. HO 

225,114 

175,972 

CO!IHITTH 

R~CDnHEMDEO 

OTY MOUIIT 

1,594 

4 ,3i'~ 

ll.U8 

10,491 

80,622 

H,U7 

1,921 

80.144 

a.1ss 

3J,l37 

32.~4 

1J.JO(I 

7,436 

, ,640 

I ,269 

'.500 

"' I.SJ~ 

1.039 

~8.MO 

,, 414,624 

" ~~.CSQ 

48.140 

225,114 

l50.i72 

~~~~~E fRDn 

REDliUT 

01'Y MOIJNT 

·49,SIJO 

'" •121),620 

•175,000 
WOR EOUIP~ENT. ~s,o, 

.. l~FORH.o.TlON SV5TEHS SECU~ITY PAOOIUH (!SSP). 

II.I.JOR ~QUJPHENT, '" ., MJOR EOUlP~fNT, '" N,I.JOR EQUIPMENT, 

.. HA.KIR EQUIPMENT. "' '" HI.JOR EQUIPHENT, 

.. MJOR EQOIPM(NT, ~· '"' TOTAL, IIAJOli. eoutr~ENT 

SPECI.o.t OPER.O.T]ONS COMMAND 

>,VJ.oTlON PROOR.I.HS ., HC-12 

.. WF AOTA~v Ill~ VKRA(I£5 AMD SUSTAI~HENT 

.. H~-60 SOl' HODER~IUTTOW P~OOFtA.H 

" MQN-STMOARO .O,Y)ATION 

" ~H-4? CHINOOK . 

" ~-11 UijH.t.JjNfD AERIAL VCHICLE 

" C~-12 SOF HOO!FICHION 

" •0-9 UN~AMHED ... ERIAl VEHICLE. 

" STUASLO. 

" PUC!SION STRIKE P.O.C'-"'E. 

'" ACIMC·IJ!IJ 

.. C·llO HOO!FlCATlONS .. 

SH!PIIUILO!NG 

" UW~fRW.o.t~R 5VSTE~S 

AH"'-!MlTIO~ PROGRAHS 

" SQF QRON.I.HCE ITE"S UHOER 55.00~.000 

204 

(I!Oll.A~S IN THOUSANDS) 

PUDGH OOM~ITIEE 

REQIJEST ~ECQIIMENO<O 

DrY AIIOUMT <IT'!' AHO\lNT 

3' 4~8 

43,708 

10, 7SJ 

29.599 

1,835.~7g 

40.500 

112.ne 

3.021 

46,2M 

22.230 

6, )g7 

l5.57S 

15.651 

I, ~00 

14~.9~ 

O~.IW 

J9.~6J 

<5' ~~g 

144' J36 

~3.448 

4J. 706 

10.783 

19.921 

J) '700 

27' ~30 

6.397 

25.~78 

12.893 

1,500 

G~, 130 

23, 7Cli 

1H.JJ6 

CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST 

OTY AHDUNT 

(0,500 

+16,800 

·•0.600 

-18.525 
OT~U PROCUREMENT Pfi.OGRAHS 

.. SOf I~TELLIG.E~CE SVSTEHS 

'" OCGS-SOF 

" OT~ER ITEHS UNOH $5,000,000. 

" SOF C0~9ATANT CRAFT SYSTINS .. 

" SPECIAl PROGRAMS 

" TACTICAL VEH!Ci.ES 

" \oi~IIR!OR $YSTEH$ UIIDER $5,00(],000 

" COII8.0.T HISSION ~EQUIRE~E~TS. 

" SO!' Gl08Al VIDEO SURVEILLMICE ACT!VITrES .. 

" SOF OI'E~ATIONAL EHIIANCE~ENfS INTELliGENCE .. 

.. SOF OPEIUITIONAL EHIIAHCENENT$, 

TOTAL, ~ECI.O.L OPERATIONS CllHHAW. 

CHEIIIC~LIIIOLDGICAL OfFENSE 

.. CHEHJC_.,L BIOLDGJ~Al SlTUAlJDNAl A\riAREKESS-. 

~ CD PROTECl!O~ A~~ ~A.ZAAD HlTTGATIOII. 

TOTM. CHEHJC~L! B[QLOGICAL OEFEHSE 

ClASS I''! ED PIIOGI!MS .. 

TOTAl, PRCli;IIMEKUT. DHE~S~·\110< 

205 

100LL~~S IN T~OUS.ONilS) 

euoon COMninEE REOU!ST RECO"~~IIDUI 

OTY A~DUIIT Q!Y A/IOU/IT 

CH.O.HG~ FRO/I 

REQUEST 

QTY A"'U~T 

··········-·-

81.001 1J, 395 ·1 ,tiD~ 

IT ,323 11.323 

a~. ss2 n.;.o2 -10.95~ 

ST,g37 51,931 

31,017 16.517 -14,51Xl 

63.13<1 63.1J• 

192,HS 192,448 

IP.9U 1~.984 

5. 0~' ~ .0<14 

31.126 ~.12$ -9,000 

HJ,849 131,110 _,,, 1l9 

I .524.435 1.'00,29~ -124,136 

170.131 170,137 

150,392 1,0.39;' 

320.52~ 320.529 

540.894 535.394 -5.000 

4,221.•31 (.358.121 •1J6.n• 

~n-n•~~•n n•~•••••n•• .. ••n 
206 

EXPLANATION Of PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thounn~ of dolt.re) 

Budg.t Committee Chango frl)l'f'l ,_, R•cr""i Re-eornmen(fed RequHt 

" THAAD SYSTEM 464,•424 414,624 -49,800 

lnte•ct~Ptors- unit co5i growth -35,200 

Dbsrnesc:ence and modl~catlons • un]u5tifitld growth -1.ol,600 

" AEGIS BMD 43~.-no 556,050 12M20 

SM-3 Block 18 edvai'!Ce procurement· unjustified requut -68,880 

SM-3 B~~ 18- 22addlllon&! imerooptor' 209,000 

F'roduct1on engineering support- carryover -19.500 

34 ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS ·IRON DOME 175,972 350,872 176,000 

Program in~rease 17~.000 

" INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) 3,448 23,448 20,000 Progrem •ncreaae 20,000 

" MC-12 4MOO -4CI,GOO 

Early to need ...;o.soo 

.. MH-60 SOF MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 3,021 19,821 16,800 

Operat1cnet k>&a replacement 18,800 

" NOH..STANOARD AVIATION 48,100 37,700 -10,&00 

Un)USH!il!d growth· ll.vFtO MC-12 Modlfoeatlon' -10.~00 

" MQ-9 UAV 1~,651 12,893 -2,7~9 

Unjustiied growlh -2.,755 

" PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE 14&,929 129,404 -16.~25 Fn~ial 'P''"- exoen growth ~.= 

Laf9e calib~r gun- und~r&~eculion -8,525 

" C-130 MODIFICATIONS 39,563 23,708 -15,656 

MC-130 TFTA- early1o need -12.1-49 

EC-130J CC!mman~o Solo- eany Fo need -3,709 

.. SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS 81.001 73,396 -7,606 

Sens~i.-e So9ht E~q:~lollalion- ewr=en gn.>wlh -7.606 

" SOF OTHER ITEMS UNDER SSM 8~.852 73,902 -10.9~ 

COllateral 9quipmant- schedule slip -7.744 

Collateral equipment- rucess to nee~ -1,620 

Joint operat1011al stock- unjustif•ed growth -260 

Cta&$ifo!K$ Coalition Global Network · unjus@ed grow1h -1.326 

" SPECIAL PROGRAMS 31,017 16,&17 -U,SOO 

Cla$aifoed adju$~ment -14.500 

" SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELUGENCE 38,12G 29,126 ~ .... CtaseiFoed adjustme'lt -9.000 

.. SOF OPERATIONAL fNiiANCEMENTS 243,84!1 231,110 -12,739 

Ciauifoed adlu,lmenl -1V39 

999 CLASSIFIEO PROGRAMS 540,894 5U,894 -5,000 

Ctass.f1ed adJustment -MOO 
207 

NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE COMPONENT PROPORTIONATE 

FUNDING 

The National Guard and reserve forces regularly receive less 

than a proportionate share of funding to resource their dual-use 

equipment needs. However, the role of the reserve components in 

providing fully equipped, trained, and ready forces in the Services' 

force generation models is essential. The Committee recommends 

that the Secretaries of the Army and the Air Force re-examine 

their funding and fielding plans for all National Guard equipment 

procurement and rebalance those plans to provide the Army and 

Air National Guards with the same new equipment when their active component counterparts field new equipment. 

NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT 

The Committee recommends $2,000,000,000 for the National 

Guard and Reserve Equipment Account in the Overseas Contingency Operations funds, to meet urgent equipment needs. 

This funding will allow the Guard and reserve components to 

procure high priority equipment that may be used for both their 

combat missions and their missions in support of state governors. 

This funding will allow the National Guard and reserve components to procure items such as emergency management training 

simulation; in-flight propeller balancing systems; SINCGAR ASIP 

radio enhancements; interoperable wideband network communications; global satellite communications on-the-move, and all necessary related hardware; C-130 propulsion system engine and propeller upgrades; electronic flight bags with tablet enabled interface; 

active electronically scanned array radars, wireless mobile mesh 

network systems; security and support mission equipment communications packages for UH-60 civil support communications; reduced size external crashworthy fuel systems; acoustic hailing devices; high mobility engineer excavators; mobile ad hoc network radios; and small arms simulation training systems. 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND-C-I46A 

The fiscal year 2015 budget request includes $37,700,000 for the 

Special Operations Command (SOCOM) as a new start to procure 

two additional C-146A aircraft. While the Committee recommendation includes the requested funds, the Committee directs that none 

of the funds may be obligated until 30 days after the Commander 

of SOCOM submits a report to the congressional defense committees that includes the validated requirement as defined by the geographic combatant commanders justifying the need for additional 

non-standard aviation (NSAV) platforms, an explanation as to why 

this requirement cannot be satisfied with existing SOCOM NSAV 

or Service platforms, an explanation of how these platforms are integrated in the SOCOM intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) way forward, the anticipated costs across the future 

years defense plan, the funding sources associated with this investment, and the impact that this investment will have on existing 

SOCOM NSAV and ISR platforms. 
208 

DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ....................... $60,135,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ................................ 21,638,000 

Committee recommendation ........................................... , 51,638,000 

Change from budget request .............................. +30,000,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $51,638,000 for 

Defense Production Act Purchases. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars) 

NEXT GENERATION STAR TRACKER SYSTEM .. 

READ OUT INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FOUNDRY IMPROVEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY 

SPACE QUALIFIED SOLAR CELL SUPflLY CHAIN . 

COMPLEMENTARY METAL OXIDE SEMICONDUCTOR fOCAL PlANE ARRAYS . 

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING FOR LIQUID ROCKET ENGINES 

CADMIUM ZINC TELLURIDE SUBSTRATES . 

ACTIVATED CARBON CAPACITY EXPANSION 

MODERNIZATION OF STEEL PLATE PRODUCTION . 

SCALE. UP OF GREEN ENERGETICS 

TRANSPARENT CERAMICS INITIATIVE 

PROGR,AM INCREASE . 

TOTAL. DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT . 

RARE EARTH ELEMENTS 

Budget 

request 

4,305 

2,639 

1,500 

1,690 

700 

1,591 

4,213 

2,000 

2.000 

1.000 

21,638 

Committee re~omrnended 

4,305 

2,639 

1,500 

1,690 

700 

1,591 

4.213 

2.000 

2,000 

1,000 

30,000 

51,638 

Change trom request 

30,000 

30.000 

The production of rare earth elements and minerals are critical 

to the natiods security in many ways. From incorporation in tools 

for the manufacture of various platforms and weapons systems to 

critical components within the platforms and weapons systems 

themselves, rare earth materials play a critical role. The Committee strongly encourages the Secretary of Defense to develop reliable domestic sources of these rare earth materials to meet the nation's strategic material requirements. 
TITLE IV 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION 

The fiscal year 2015 Department of Defense research, development, test and evaluation budget request totals $63,533,947,000. 

The Committee recommendation provides $63,362,890,000 for the 

research, development, test and evaluation accounts. The table 

below summarizes the Committee recommendations: 

(209) 
210 

(DOLLII.RS JN TKOUSA'-IOS) 

RECAPITUtATIOH 

RESEARCH, DEVELO~"ENT, TEST AND EVALUATIO~. "-RHV. 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, NAVY. 

RESEARCH. [)EVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUAHOrt AU!: FORCE. 

RESEARCH, OEVHOPIIENT, TEST AtiO EVALUATION, 

DEfENSE-WIDE. 

OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE 

GI!AN[I TOTAL, ROH.E. 

8UOGET COMHITHE CHA"'GE FROII 

REQUEST RECGHIIENDED REQUEST 

6,5!l3,8\18 6,120,000 +-128. 102 

16,2ll6,335 15,877,710 -388.566 

23,739.892' 23' ~38' 982 -300,910 

11;1' 766.064 n.on.11oo +311 ,816 

167' 736 248.238 +80 '500 

63,533,947 63,362,090 -171.057 

==========~= ,..,.,.,,..,~==== ~"''""•~•=:n: 
211 

SPECIAL INTEREST ITEMS 

Items for which additional funds have been provided or items for 

which funding has been reduced as shown in the project level tables or in paragraphs using the phrase "only for" or 110nly to" in the 

Committee report are congressional interest items for the purpose 

of the Base for Reprogramming (DD Form 1414). Each of these 

items must be carried on the DD Form 1414 at the stated amount 

specifically addressed in the Committee report. Below threshold 

reprogrammings may not be used to either restore or reduce funding from congressional interest items as identified on the DD Form 

1414. These items remain special interest items whether or not 

they are repeated in a subsequent conference report. 

REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR ACQUISITION ACCOUNTS 

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to continue to 

follow the reprogramming guidance as specified in the report accompanying the House version of the fiscal year 2008 Department 

of Defense Appropriations Act (House Report 110-279). Specifically, 

the dollar threshold for reprogramming funds will remain at 

$20,000,000 for procurement and $10,000,000 for research, development, test and evaluation. 

The Secretary shall continue to follow the limitation that prior 

approval reprogrammings are set at either the specified dollar 

threshold or 20 percent of the procurement or research, development, test and evaluation line, whichever is less. These thresholds 

are cumulative from the base for reprogramming value as modified 

by any adjustments. Therefore, if the combined value of transfers 

into or out of a procurement (P-1) or research, development, test 

and evaluation (R-1) line exceeds the identified threshold, the Secretary of Defense must submit a prior approval reprogramming to 

the congressional defense committees. In addition, guidelines on 

the application of prior approval reprogramming procedures for 

congressional special interest items are established elsewhere in 

this report. 

REPROGRAMMING REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 

The Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to continue to provide the congressional defense committees 

quarterly, spreadsheet-based DD Form 1416 reports for Service 

and defense-wide accounts in titles III and IV of this Act as required in the explanatory statement accompanying the Department 

of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2006. 

FUNDING INCREASES 

The Committee directs that the funding increases outlined in 

these tables shall be provided only for the specific purposes indicated in the tables. 

CLASSIFIED ANNEX 

Adjustments to the classified programs are addressed in a classified annex accompanying this report. 
212 

LITHIUM-JON BATTERIES 

The Committee supports the Department's investments in power 

generation and energy storage. In particular, the development and 

deployment of lithium-ion batteries is important to current and future Department platforms. The Committee understands that recent technology issues and concerns have slowed this development. 

Due to the capability increase lithium-ion batteries could potentially provide, the Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense 

to dedicate resources to further the development of these batteries. 

HYBRID AIRSHIP DEVELOPMENT 

The Secretary of Defense, in cooperation with the Secretary of 

the Air Force and the Commander of the United States Transportation Command, should work to solicit competitive bids for proofof-concept demonstrations of hybrid airships with global reach capabilities. Such efforts should be developed with a view to rapidly 

transition to full scale production hybrid airships for heavy lift. The 

Committee is aware that such airships can operate in areas without significant ground infrastructure, allowing the delivery of cargo 

directly to where it is needed, including areas far removed from air 

and sea ports and areas where infrastructure has been destroyed 

by natural disaster or conflict. 

ANTI-CORROSION EFFORTS 

The Committee understands that the Department of Defense continues to pursue an anti-corrosion program that is practical, affordable, and cost effective. The Department spends substantial 

amounts of money every year to prevent and mitigate corrosion on 

various platforms, equipment, and facilities. The Committee is 

aware that suppliers to the oil and gas industry use several different corrosion prevention materials to meet their anti-corrosion 

requirements. Additionally, other government agencies have made 

great strides in metallic coatings that may offer anti-corrosion 

properties and extend the service life of equipment and infrastructure. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to investigate these anti-corrosion activities and adapt them in the Department of Defense where possible. 

EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL 

Accidental detonation of unexploded ordnance has claimed the 

lives of a significant number of servicemembers. The Committee 

strongly supports efforts to develop, demonstrate, and field solutions and techniques to protect warfighters from accidental detonation of unexploded ordnance. Further, the Committee believes there 

is a need to develop environmentally sustainable, near 100 percent 

efficient Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) technologies and techniques for unexploded ordnance containing highly insensitive energetic materials, while at the same time minimizing the amount of 

energetic material required for successful EOD operations. Alternate EOD technologies and techniques will reduce the risk of increased range contamination with energetic materials and will potentially reduce the cost of restoring training ranges. Alternative 

technologies will also increase EOD safety on the battlefield by re-
213 

ducing the time required to address unexploded ordnance and promoting efficiency by decreasing the logistical burden of transporting and handling demolition ei'xpFlo:.:;s:.:;iv:.:e:::s:::.·------------4, 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, ARMY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ......................... . ...................... $7,126,318,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ........................ ................... 6,593,898,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................. 6,720,000,000 

Change from budget request ........................... ................................ +126,102,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,720,000,000 

for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2015: 
MULTISPECTRAL SIGNATURE MANAGEMENT 

The Committee is aware ofthe emerging threat posed by shortwave infrared 

detection systems that are increasingly available in the civilian marketplace and 

may be deployed by adversaries. In many cases, the passive signature 

management systems currently deployed by the Department of Defense do not 

provide adequate protection against these advanced sensors. In order to mitigate 

this increased vulnerability, the Committee recommends the development and 

procurement of passive multispectral protection, and encourages the Secretary of 

Defense to pursue domestically-produced, cost effective solutions that provide 

visual, near-infrared, thermal infrared, and broad-band radar threat mitigation 

capabilities. The Committee urges the Secretary of Defense to develop solutions 

that address the Department's demonstrated need for urban and aviation signature 

management systems, as well as to identifY a suitable replacement for outdated 

arctic signature management systems. 
214 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSA~OS) 

RUDGfl C(IMI'II TTEE CHANGE FR(IM 

REQUEST RECCIM"'ENOEO REQUEST 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARIIY 

BASIC RESEARCH 

IN·IiOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH 13,464 13,464 

OEFENSE RESEARCH SCW~CES 238,167 238,187 

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH HHTIATIVES, 69,808 69, BOB 

UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS. 102,737 102' 737 

............ TOTAL. BAS!t RESEARCH. 424,176 424,176 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

MTER IALS TECHNOLOGY. 28,006 29,008 

SENSORS !\NO ELECTRONIC SU~JVABIL!TY. 33.515 33,:115 

TRACTOR HIP 16,358 16,356 

AVIATION TECHNOLOGY 63' 433 63.433 

ELECTRONIC WARe-ARE TECHNOLOGY '" "' 18,502 

" !!l SS! LE TECHNOLOGY. " ... 56,194 +10.000 

" ADVANCED WEAPONS TECIINOLOGV. " "' 28.528 

" 1\DVANCED CONCEPTS "'NO SIMULATION. " "' 27,HS 

" COMBAT VEHICLE A~D AUT0110TJVE TECH'-'<ILOGY. 72' 863 72,683 

,. BALLISTICS TECH!IOLOGY 65.597 85,5~7 

" CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY •. 3,971 3,971 

" JOINT SERVICE SI1ALL ARMS PROGRAM. 6.653 6,653 

" WEAPOHS ANO HUNJT[QHS TECHNOLOGY. " 069 63.089 +25. 000 

" ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES. " "' 56' 435 

" NIGHT \IISlOM TECHNOLOGY 38.H5 36' 445 

" COUNTERMINE .!IY.!ITEH.!I " '" 25' 9311 

" HUHAN FACTO~S E~GINEE~!NG TECHNillOOY. " "' 23' 763 

22 E~IRONPIENTAL QUALITY TECHNOlOGY. 15.659 15,6S9 

" COHHANO. CONTROL. COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY. 33.817 33,817 

" COMPUTE~ AND SOFTWARE TECHNI)LOGY. 11), 764 10,764 

25 HI LITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY. " "' 63,311 

" t\ANPDWE~ I PE~SONNELITRA !NINO TECHNOLOGY " 295 23.295 

" WARFIGHTEII: TECHNOLOGY. 25,751 32.051 .. 6,300 

" 11EDICAL TECHNOLOGY 76.066 76' 066 

············ TOTAL. APPLIED RESEARCH. 862.611 9D3,911 +41 ,300 
215 

(DOLLARS IN THOLISANOS) 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHANGE FRO~ 

R~QUUT II:ECOI!~ENOEO REQUEST 

······-------- ........... 

AOVAHCEO TEC!INOLOGY DE\IELOPMENT 

" WARFJGIHER AOVAIICEO TECHNOLOGY, " '" 86,139 +1 ,000 

30 MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, 67,291 98,291 +31 ,000 

" AVIATION ADVANCED TECimOLOGV,. 98.990 98' 990 

" WEAPONS .WP IIUNlTIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 57.931 72,931 +15,000 

33 COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIIIE AOVA~CEO TECHNOLOGY. 110,031 110.031 

,. COI111AND, CONTitOL, COHIIUNICIITIONS ADVANCED TECHNO~OGV. 6.883 6,883 

" MANPO'<IER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING 1\0VIINCEO TECHNOLOGY. 13.580 13.580 

36 ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 44,!71 44,871 

" TRACTOR HIKE. 7 -~92 "' 

" NEXT GENERATJOH TRAINJMG & Sli11,1LAT!0N SYSTEIIS. 16,749 " "' 39 TRACTO~ ROSE. 14.463 14,483 

" COJ'IBATI,_G TERRORISJ'I. TECI!NOLOGY OE\IELOPIIENT. 24 '270 24,270 

" TRACTOR NAIL. 3,440 3, 440 

., TRACTOR EGGS., 2,406 2. 408 

.. EL£CTR()tjJC WARFARE TCCHMOLOGY, . 26.057 2B, 057 

" M !SSlLE AND ROCKET ADVA.IICED TECHNOLOGY. 44,057 U,957 

" TRACTOR CAGE. 11 '105 11' 105 

" HIGH PERFORJ'IANCE COJ'IPIJTlNO J'IQOERNIZATION PROGRAJ'I .. 181 ,609 1$1 .609 

" LAHOJ'IIIIE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 13,074 13,074 

" JOINT SERVICE $HA1.L o\RJ'I$ PROGRo\~ 7 ,J21 ! ,321 

50 NIGHT \llSlON ADVANCED TECHIIOLOGY. 44,138 44,138 

" ENVIRON"ENTAL QUALITV TECHNOLOGY OE"ONSTRATION$. 9.191 9.197 

" J'IJLPARY CNGINEERHIG AOVA~EO TECHNOLOGY 1T ,613 " '" 

" AOVAPICEO TACTICAL C011PUTER SCIENCE & SENSOR TECHNOLOGY. 39.164 39, , .. TOTAL, MWANCEO TECHNCLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 917,791 964' 791 +47 .ooo 
216 

{DOLLARS TN TH(lUSAWOS) 

OEI'IONSTAAT!O"' & VALIDATION 

54 ARI'IY I'IISSILE DEFENSE SYSTHIS INTEGRATION. 

55 ARMY MISSILE DE~ENSE SYSTEI'IS INTEGRATION iSPIICE). 

56 TANI( AND HEDIUH CALIBER AMMUNITION 

60 SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY 

61 T ... CTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM - AD 

62 N ICHT V] S [ON SYSTEHS ADVANCED D[VELOPH[NT. 

63 ENVIRONHENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLQG'I. 

!55 NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPI'IENT 

67 LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EOUJPIIENT • ADV DEV. 

69 MEDICAL SYSTEMS • foDV OEV. 

70 SOLDIER SYSTEMS • ADVANCED OEVELOPI'IENT 

7:2 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES. 

73 TECHNOLOGY HATURATtOH INITIATIVES. 

74 ASSURED POSIHONING, h'JWIGATION MiD THUNG (PNT). 

76 INDIRECT FIRE P~OTECTlON CAPABILITY INCREIIE~ 2·HIT~RC .. 

TOTAL. OEI!ONSTRATIOI<I I VALIDATION 

BUDGET COl! "'I TTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECD~!1EMOED REQUEST 

12, 7~7 

13' 999 

29.334 

9,602 

8,953 

3.052 

7,830 

2,954 

13.386 

23' 859 

6,830 

9,913 

74 740 

g ,930 

96. 177 

323 156 

12,797 

13,999 

29' 334 

II ,002 

8, 953 

3,052 

7,830 

2, 954 

13.388 

23,65~ 

9,830 

9.913 

74,740 

9,930 

71, I 77 

302' 556 

+1 ,400 

+3. 000 

-25.000 

-20.600 
217 

(DOLLARS !M THOUSAND$) 

ENGJNHIU MG & HANUFACTURING OEVELDPMEKT 

79 AIR(:RAFT AVIONICS. 

81 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DE\IELOPMEMT 

82 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO. 

83 ltiD-TIER NETlMORK!NG VEHICULAR RADIO. 

84 All SOURCE ANALYSTS SVSTEIL 

85 TRACTOR CAGE 

86 INFANTRY SUPf'(IRT WEAPONS. 

87 HEDIUH T.O.CT!CAL VEHICLES. 

86 JAVELlH, 

89 Fll~llY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES. 

90 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL. 

91 TACTICAL UNIV.HNED GRGUNO VEHICLE, 

92 NIGHT YlSlON SYSH"'S SOD. 

93 COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHli<G, AND EQUIPMENT 

94 NON-SYSTEM TRAINI'IG DEVICES SOD. 

96 AIR DEFENSE COKHANO. CONTROL AND INTELLIGEMCE ·SDO. 

97 CONSTRUCTIVE SIIIULATIOM SYSTHIS OEVELOPMEHT 

98 AUTOHATlC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT. 

99 DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SlHULATIONS (DIS) SOD. 

100 COMBINED ARIIS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE. 

101 BRJGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION ANO EVALUATION. 

102 WEAPONS AND HUNITII)NS SOD. 

BUDGET COIIH[TTEE CHANGE FROH 

REOOEST RECOI1MENOED REQUEST 

37.246 

6.002 

9,632 

9. 730 

5,532 

19.929 

27,684 

,,, 

4 '166 

12 913 

16 764 

6. 770 

65 333 

1 ,335 

8.945 

15,906 

4 ,3Q4 

11 ,064 

10,027 

105,279 

15.006 

57' 246 

5,002 

9,632 

9,130 

~.532 

19,929 

34,586 

4,166 

12 913 

16 764 

6,770 

65.333 

3, 035 

15,906 

4, 394 

11.084 

10.027 

42,430 

!05,219 

15,006 

+20,000 

+6' 702 

., '700 
218 

(OULLAI.::; IN IHUIJ::;IINIJ::;) 

103 LOGISTICS AND t.NGINEER EOlHPI'tENT SOD. 

104 COHHANO, CQND;:OL, COHHU~ICATIONS SYSTEMS - SDO 

lOS MEDICAL MTER!EL111EOICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EOU!PHENT. 

106 LANDHlNE WARFARE/eARFIIER SOD. 

108 ARPIY TACTICAL COHI'IAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE, 

109 AAOAA OEVELO~ENT 

111 FJREF]HDER. 

112 SOLDIER SYSTEMS WARRIOR DEHIVAL. 

113 ARTILLERY SYSTEHS. 

116 THFOFIHATIQH TECHNOLOGY OEIIELOPHENT. 

117 AR~Y INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEt! (A-II'tH. 

118 ARMORED IIULTI·PURPOSE VEHICLE. 

119 JOINT TACTICAL HETI<jORK CENTER (JTNC) 

120 JOINT TACTICAL HE'N{)Rk (JHI) 

121 COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CJRCI'I). 

122 WIN-T INCREMENT 3 - FULL NETWORkiNG. 

123 AMF JOIHT TA.CTICAL RADIO SYSSTEH. 

124 JOINT AIR- TO-GROUND MISSILE {JAGM). 

125 PIIC·2111SE 11ISSlLE. 

126 ARMY INTEGRA nO ~til. IINO 11JSSILE DEFENSE (o\IA/10). 

127 111\NNEO GROUND VEHICLE .. 

128 AERIAL CDI1110N SENSOR •. 

129 NATIONAL CAPAfiiLlTIES !NTE(iRATION. 

130 JOINT LI(;I;T TACTICAL VEHICLE ENG AND MANUFACTURING. 

131 AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQU1P11ENT,. 

132 PALADIN INTEGRATED 11ANAGEI1ENT (Pill). 

133 TROJAN - RH\2. 

134 ELECTRONIC WA~FARE DEVELOPMENT. 

TQT!I.l. ENGlNEERlNG & HANUFACTUIHtiG DEVELOPfl(NT .. 

8UflGfT COI'IMITTH CI-IAHGE FROf'l 

REOUEST RECOIIJ'IENDEO REQUEST 

4,433 

30.397 

51.70$ 

29,663 

5,2"24 

37.492 

6.157 

1 .912 

69,761 

136,465 

92.353 

B .440 

17 .999 

us ,409 

113.210 

6,662 

83.838 

35.009 

142,564 

49 160 

17 746 

15 212 

45 716 

10.041 

83. 300 

'" B. 961 

1.719.374 

24.581 

4. 433 

30.31H 

57' 705 

29,683 

"' 37 4!l2 

6,157 

t.9H 

89 781 

138 485 

92.353 

II, 440 

17.999 

145.409 

113,210 

e, 862 

BJ, BJB 

35.009 

152,584 

49, 160 

17,H8 

15,212 

45, 71B 

10.041 

83. 300 

'" 

6,961 

1. 757.776 

1"10,000 

+38. 402 
219 

(tliJLLA~S LN lltUUSII.Nmi) 

BIJOOET CO~MITTEE CliA.NGE FROI'I 

~EOUEST RECOI'II'IENOEO REQUEST 

----------------------- -------------

ROT&E ~ANAGf11ENT SUPPORT 

"' THREAT Sl11ULATOR DEVELOP11ENT. 18,062 18,06~ 

"' TAR(lET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT. 10.040 10.040 

"' IIAJOR T&E INVESTIIENT 60,317 60,317 

"' I!:AHO MI:IW\'0 CENTER. 20,612 20,612 

"' ARI'1'1 KWAJALETN ATOLL 176,041 176.041 

'" CONCEPTS EX,.ER!IIENTi\TIQ11 PROGRA/1. 19' 439 19.~39 

H2 ARI1V' T!ST FlANGES MID FACILlTlES .. 275' 025 HS,025 

'" ARI1Y HCHHICAL TEST INSTRU11ENTATrON AND TARGETS. 45.596 ~5,596 

"' SURVIVASI L:TY I LETHALITY AW.L YS!S. " 295 33.295 

"' AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION. 4, 700 4, 700 

"' 11ETEOROLOGlCIIL SIJF'PORT TO RDT&E IICTIVITIES 6, 413 8,413 

'" MATERIEL SYSTfiiS ANALYSIS 20 "' 20,746 

"' fXPLOJTATION OF FOREIGJ; ITEMS "' 7,015 

"' SUPPORT OF OPERAHO~AL TESTING .. "' 49,221 

"' ARM\' EVALUATfOII Cf!ITER. 55.039 ~5.039 

'" Sl~ULATlOil & MODELING FOR ACO. ROTS, $. TNG (SMART). 1, 12S 1.125 

"2 PROGAA~WlOE ACTIVITIES. 64, 1611 64,169 

'" TECHNICAL INFORHJ.TION ACTIVITIES. 32,319 32,319 

"' MUNITIONS STJ,NOAROtzATION, EFFECTIVENESS II NO SII~ETY. 49' 052 64.052 +111. 000 

"' ENVIRON~SNTAL QUALITY TECHioiDLOOV I'!GI'IT SUPPORT. 2, 612 2,612 

"' MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS lRESEAACH AND OEVELOPHENT) 49' 592 49,592 

-----·------ ----------· T()TAL, ROT&E IIAAAGEHENT SUPPORT, '.000 '" 1,015.~30 +Hi,OOO 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

"' 11LRS PRODUCE H1PROVE11EIIT PROGRAII. 17' 112 17' 112 

159 LOGISTICS AUTOMATION 3, 654 3,654 

150 BIOMETRIC ENABLI~G CAPo\BILITV (BEC). 1 ,332 1 ,332 

"' PATRIOT PRODUCT IIIPROVE11ENT. 152,991 152,991 

152 AER05TAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE. 54' 016 29,076 ·25 ,ooo 

"' AOV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SVSTEII 22,374 22,3H 

"' JOINT AUTOI1ATEO DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTE~. 24,371 2"4.371 

"' COI1BAT VEHICLE II'!PIIOVEMENT PF!OGRAHS 295.177 32"0, 177 +2S. 000 

"' MANEUV£R CONTROL SYSTE" 45' 092 45,092 

"' AIRCRAFT MOOTFTC.O.TIOioiSIPRODUCT JHP,WVEHENT PROGRAMS. 264,887 274,887 +10,000 
220 

8U0Gfl COI'IHITTEE CHANGf. FROJ'I 

REOUEST REt!»''HENOEtJ REQUEST 

"" AIRCRAFT ENGINE COHPQ,'!En IMPROVEMENT PROGI!AII "' '" 

"' DIGITTZII.TIOH 10,912 10,912 

'" I'HSS!LEIAJ~ DEFENSE PRODUCT HIPROVEMENT PI!OGRAI't 5,, 15 5,115 

"' OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT 111PROVEHENT PROGRAI'!S. 411,848 44,848 -5,000 

,, TRACTOR CARD 22,6111 22,691 

"' INTEGRATED SASE DEFENSE - OPERATIONAL SVST£11 OEV. 4,364 4,364 

'" MATEI:Il.-,LS HI\NDLING EOUIPHENT. '" '" m EM\IIRONIIEtHAL OUALTT\' TECHNOLOGY oPERATIONo\.L, '" 280 

"' LOWER TIER AlR AND IIISSJU DEFENSE (AHO) SYST£11. 78,758 76.758 

m GUIDED IIULTtPLE-LAUHCH ~OCKfT SYSTEM lGMLRSi. 45,377 45,377 

"" JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM. 10,209 10,209 

'" SECURITY AHO JNTHLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. 12,525 1~.525 

'"' JNFORHATION SYST£115 SECURITV PROGRAM 14,175 14,\75 

,., GLOBAL COIIB"T SUPPORT SYSTEM 4,527 4,527 

'" SAT COM Gfi:Ol/ND EJIIYlRONIIENT (SPACE). 11 ,011 11 ,011 

185 ~'"CCSIGLOBAL COMII.AMC AND CONTROL SYSTEM 2,151 2,151 

'" TACTICAL UNIIANNEC AEfi:IAL '.'~li!CLES. 22,870 22,870 

"' OISTRISUTED COIIIION OROUNDISURFACE SYSTEHS. 20,155 20,155 

"' M0·1 SKY \o/AIIfl:lOfl: A UAY /110· 1C GRAY EAGlt liAS I· 46.~T2 46,472 

'" VERTICAL l/115 16,389 16,389 

"' BIOMETRICS t"NABLEO INTELLIGENCE 1 ,974 1 ,974 

'" \o/It.-T INCREMENT 2 INITIAL NETWQRKINO 3. 249 3.249 

,.. END 1Hl1 I~DUSTfi:IAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES. 76,225 76' 225 

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEI!S CEYELOPIIENT 1.341,558 1,346,558 +5. 000 

CLASSIFIED Pfi:OGRI\,S, 4,802 4.002 

TOTAL, RESEAfi:CH, DEYE:U:IPI!E'fl. TEST & EYAL, 1\ll!i'l. 8,593,898 6.720,000 +126, 102 

"""""""""""" """~~="~u'"" z"""""""'"-=~ 
221 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVt:L ADJUSTMENTS 

On thouund& of doll•r.J 

Budget CommlttM Clllnge from 

.. , Request Recommended Request 

10 MISSILE TECHNOLOOV 46,194 5&,194 10,000 

Program increase 10,000 

17 WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY 36,069 63,089 25,000 

Program increue 25,000 

" WARFIOHTER TECHNOLOGY 25,751 32,051 

Program increase ,,300 '·"' 

" WARFIGHTER AOVMCED TECHNOLOGY 85,139 66,139 1,000 

Pro.gram increne 1,000 

3D MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 67,291 98,291 31,000 

Peer-rev1ewed neurotoxfn e~pcsure treatment Parilim.on's 

resaerch !6,000 

Peer-re~lewed neurofibromatosis re~arch 15,000 

" WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 57,931 72,931 15,000 Progr;,rn •ncreas<:~ 15,000 

" SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY 9,602 11,002 1,400 

Prcgrem increasa 1.<100 

70 SOLDIER SY5TEM:S ·ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 6,1130 UlO 3,000 

Army re(lue&ted 1rao1fer from INTCV. lioe 19 2,048 

Arm~ reQue&ted traoafer from INTCV hoe 31 "' INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY 

" INCREMENT 2 t6,177 71,177 ·26,000 

Funding anead of ne&d ·25.000 

79 AIRCRAFT AVIONICS 37,24& 57,241 :0,000 

Degraded Visual Environment UH-601. demooWetlon 20,000 

" INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS 27,884 34,58& 6,7(12 

Arm~ reoue~~ted tren~fer from WTCV line 19 6.702 

" COMBAT FEEDING, Cl.OTHING, AND EQUIPMENT 1,335 3.035 1,700 

Program rncrea&ll 1.700 

"' ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE 142,584 152,5&.4 10,000 

Covoter cyber vulrlefabrlilies 10.000 

MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND 

"' SAFETY 49,082 64,052 15,000 P<ogram rncrea~~e 15.000 

"' AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE 54,076 29,076 ·25.000 

Fundrnn ahead of neer;l ·25.000 
222 

Budget Committee Chang9 from ,_, RIIQUe.t R&comme!'lded Reque11 

"' COM8A T VEI-IICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 29~.177 320,177 2MOO Program In cruse- Stryker engin~ng eh$ngu 25.000 

AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 

"' PROGRAMS 264,887 274.837 10,000 

Program 1ncrease • Improved (\lrbjno l!ngine program 10,0:0 

m OTI-IER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 49,848 "",1148 -5,000 

Funding ahead of need -5,000 
223 

ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE 

The congressional defense committees have encouraged the Army 

to adopt or develop a replacement vehicle for the Mll3 series armored personnel carriers of Vietnam War vintage. The challenge is 

to replace the Mll3 series with a vehicle or vehicles capable of filling the M113 mission roles across the breadth and depth of the formations. Since any vehicles procured by the Army are likely to remain in service for 40 or more years, the Committee expects the 

Army to make choices based on merit and fiscal responsibility. 

When selecting a replacement, the Army must also consider the 

five missions performed by the Mll3 variants: general purpose, 

mortar carrier, mission command, medical evacuation, and medical 

treatment. Additionally, the Army should consider the full spectrum of evolving missions. The Committee notes that the Army has 

fielded a wheeled medical evacuation vehicle based on a wheeled 

combat vehicle and that it has served in combat as a component 

of the armored brigade combat teams. The Committee is aware 

that the Army is focusing on first replacing the 2,897 Mll3 series 

vehicles that are located in the brigade combat teams. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army to respond promptly 

to provide reports and briefings directed by the congressional defense committees, while advancing the program within funding limitations. The Committee recommendation provides $92,353,000, 

fully funding this effort in fiscal year 2015. 

In addition, the Committee directs the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act on existing wheeled and tracked combat vehicles 

that are used for medical purposes. The report should assess the 

speed, agility, mobility, survivability, patient comfort, and suitability of these vehicles for use by field medical personnel as well 

as the procurement and operation and support costs for these vehicles to determine their suitability as the medical evacuation variant of the Armored Multi-purpose Vehicle (AMPV) within the armored brigade combat team. This report shall compare the results 

of the assessment cited above to the current Army plans to develop, 

procure, and operate a new medical evacuation vehicle as part of 

the current AMPV program of record. In addition, this report shall 

include a separate section providing the independent views of the 

Army Surgeon General on the criteria outlined above and any other 

criteria deemed relevant by the Army Surgeon General. 

NETWORK INTEGRATION EVALUATION 

The Committee notes that the Army's Network Integration Evaluation (NIE) program has made substantial progress in enhancing 

its ability to assist in the delivery of successful network technologies. The Committee is aware that the Army NIE program has 

tested or evaluated secure tactical nodal software which is intended 

to provide a more efficient way to integrate tactical capabilities 

within the network. The Committee understands that the technology that is being incorporated into the Army's network operations has successfully completed the NIE process. The Committee 

urges the Secretary of the Army to continue to incorporate tech-
224 

nologies from small businesses in upcoming Army Network Integration Evaluations. 

DEGRADED VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 

The Committee is aware that many of the accidents involving 

Army helicopters that result in the loss of aircraft and personnel 

are attributable to flight operations in a degraded visual environment. Additionally, despite the improvements in pilot assist devices 

that are available on newer aircraft, a significant part of the helicopter fleet is older and does not have the upgrades to assist with 

the effects of a degraded visual environment. A 2009 Department 

of Defense study, updated in 2012, noted that 70 percent of fatalities and 80 percent of aircraft losses resulted from serious accidents that were not the result of hostile fire, but rather wire 

strikes, engine failures, and brownouts. The Committee understands that the Army has prepared to conduct operational field 

testing on various products to assist flight crews during situations 

of degraded visual environment. The Committee recommendation 

includes an additional $20,000,000 to support the Army's operational testing of counter degraded visual environment equipment. 

The Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 120 

days after the enactment of this Act on the Army's expenditure 

plan of the funds provided to assist the Army with the degraded 

visual environment challenge. 

POLYMER RESEARCH IMPROVEMENTS 

Polymers are becoming more easily manufactured1 less expensive 

to manufacture, and increasingly lightweight. State-of-the-art polymer materials can also result in improved ballistic perfonnance. 

Accordingly, the Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army 

to consider the application of polymers in the context of conducting 

ballistic research. 

ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION 

The Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining and 

improving the military decision making process. Proven skill in the 

decision making process has a large effect on performance in battle. 

Gaming, modeling, and simulation establish a reality factor which 

assists military leaders in preparation for all functions on the battlefield, including logistics. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army to focus research and development investments 

with institutions of higher education developing cognitive mapbased modeling and simulation tools to advance battlefield readiness of military planning for both tacticians and logisticians. 

TESTING OF VIRTUAL TRAINING SYSTEMS 

Live, virtual gaming has become a valuable component of the 

Army's training curriculum. Due to its adaptability, virtual gaming 

may provide potential cost savings, improved training experience, 

and enhanced readiness. However, the Committee is concerned 

that these virtual training systems lack consistent testing and evaluation. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Army to es-
225 

tablish standards and testing to ensure that these systems provide 

the warfighter with the best training experience possible. 

ARMY NET ZERO POLICY 

The Army's net zero energy, water, and waste policy requires installations to produce as much energy as they consume, limits 

freshwater consumption, restores the watersheds surrounding installations, and attempts to reduce, reuse, or recover waste streams 

to convert the waste to resources. The Committee supports the 

Army's net zero policy and strongly encourages the Secretary of the 

Army to develop and demonstrate technologies to advance the policy and enhance the sustainable operation of its industrial munitions base. 

LIGHTWEIGHT ADVANCED PERSONNEL PROTECTION 

The Committee is aware of progress being made at the Natick 

Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center to design 

and test lightweight advanced armor to better protect the warfighter, specifically the face and eyes. The Committee encourages 

the Secretary of the Army to explore the use of novel, high-performance, lightweight, transparent ballistic protection materials to 

continue the progress being made to better protect the warfighter. 

AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT 

The Army is the single manager for conventional ammunition 

(SMCA) for the entire Department of Defense. In this capacity, the 

Army ensures effective life cycle management of conventional ammunition, a role becoming more challenging as a result of declining 

resources and force structure reductions. The Committee believes 

the management of conventional ammunition could be assisted by 

the establishment of new generation munitions material and manufacturing technologies in the national technical industrial base. 

Further, the Committee believes that automated and streamlined 

munitions manufacturing and new ammunition technologies play a 

critical role to the Department of Defense as they will provide a 

sustaining, cost saving, flexible manufacturing capability for the 

nation's munitions well into the future. The Committee encourages 

the Secretary of the Army, as the SMCA, to equip the national 

technical industrial base with these new and emerging smart manufacturing and ammunition tec7<hrn"'o"l"'o..,·e"s"-.--------------\ 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, NAVY 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation . $14,949,919,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request 16,266,335,000 

Committee recommendation .. .................. 15,877,770,000 

Change from budget request -388,565,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $15,877,770,000 

for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2015: 
BA 1TLEFIELO MAPPING AND CHARTING 

The BuckEye and Joint Airbome Lidar Bathymetry Technical Center of 

Expertise (JALBTCX) provide valuable engineering, mapping, and charting 

infonnation to support planning, training, and operations to maintain maritime 

navigation. BuckEye provides imagery intelligence, geospatial intelligence, and 

geospatial foundation data for battlefield intelligence from manned and unmanned 

platforms over a range of altitudes, while JALBTCX provides coastal and 

underwater high resolution elevations and imagery which provides data fusion 

products required to help manage navigable waters of the United States. The 

Committee recognizes the military value these programs provide to combatant 

commanders and coalition and host nation forces, and expects that the President's 

budget request for Overseas Contingency Operations will request full funding for 

these important programs. 
226 

I DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

RESEAROI, DEVELOPMENT. TEST & EVAL ~AVY 

SASIC RESEARCH 

UJIJVERSJTY RESEARCfi IN!TIAHVES. 

IN-HOUSE LABORATORY UIOEPENOENT RESEARCH. 

DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES. 

TOTAL. BASIC RESEARCH 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH. 

FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED ~SEARCH. 

MARINE CORPS LIINDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY. 

COH!t!JN PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH 

WARHGHl ER SUSTAI N!tENT APPLl EO RESEARCH 

ELECTROit,.GNEHC SVSTEI1S APPLIED RESEARCH 

!0 OCEAN WARFIGHT!NG ENVIRONI'IENT APPLIED RESEARCH 

11 JOJtiT NON· LETHAL WEAPONS APPL !EO RESEARCH. 

12 UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 

13 FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES AO\IAt.ICED TECHIIDLOGV DEY. 

14 HJNE .O.NO EXPEDITIONI'IRY WARFARE APPLIED i"'ESEAII:CH. 

TOT.-.L, APPLIED RESEARCH. 

ADVANCED TECHifO~OGY OEVELOP~ENT 

1~ POWER PROJECTION 1\01/AHCEO TEC!iNO~OGY. 

16 FORCE PROTECTION AOI/AIIICEO TECHNOLOGY. 

17 EUCTROMAGNHIC SYSTEMS AO\III.NCEO TECMNOLCIGY. 

18 HAillNE CORPS ,0,0\IA~ED TEC~NOLOGY OEMD!.ISTilATtON (ATO) 

19 JOIHT NON·LEHIAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY OEVELOP11ENT 

20 FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEV 

21 WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 

22 UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 

23 NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AMO DEMONSTRATIONS 

24 HlN~ AMO EXPEOITIONARY WARFARE AOVAHCEO TECHNOLOGY. 

TOTAL, AO\IANCEO TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CKANGE fROH 

REQUEST RECOMI1ENOEO REQUEST 

113 908 

18 734 

443.697 

576,339 

95,753 

139.496 

45,831 

43,541 

46,923 

107,872 

45.388 

5,887 

66.880 

170 786 

32 526 

820 863 

25 831 

64.623 

118 397 

11 .506 

256 1H 

4,838 

'" 

000 

5~5.014 

113,908 

18,734 

443.697 

~76. 339 

95,753 

45,831 

46,923 

107,872 

65,388 

5,887 

86.880 

176,086 

32.526 

848,183 

37. 734 

25,831 

6~' 623 

128,397 

11. soe 

261.144 

40 538 

9, 98$ 

53. 956 

2,000 

635,714 

+20 '000 

+5 ,300 

+25. 300 

+5,000 

+40.700 
227 

(DClLLA~S IN THOUSANDS) 

DENONSTRAHON & VALJOATION 

25 AIRIOCUN TACTIC,I,L APPLICATIONS. 

26 AVIATION SURVIVABILITV. 

27 DEPLOYABLE JOINT CONMND AND CONTROL. 

28 AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS. 

211 ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPNEHT. 

30 TACTtC ... L AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE 

31 ADVANCED COI\SA T SVSTEI'IS TECHNOLOGY. 

32 SURFACE I.NO SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES. 

33 SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE 

34 CARRIER SYSTEIIS OEVEL~IIENT. 

35 PILOT FISH 

36 RETRACT LARCH. 

37 RETRACT JUNIPER 

36 RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL. 

JS SURFACE ASW 

40 ADVANCED SUBMARINE SVSTEII OEVELOPI'!ENT 

41 SUBMARINE TACHCAL WAAFARE SYSTEMS. 

42 SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN 

43 SHIP PRELINlN.t.RY DESIGN I. FEASIBILITY STUDIES .. 

44 AOVIIPICED NUCLEAR POI.£R SYSTEMS. 

45 ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEIIS .. 

46 CHALK EAGLE. 

47 liTTORAL C0"8AT SffiP (LCS). 

~6 C~8AT $'f'STEII JNTEORATION .. 

49 OIHO REPLACEMENT PROGRAII, 

SO LirTORAL CO"BAT SHIP (LCS) MISSION PACKAGES 

51 AI,ITOIIAT!C TUT AND RE-TEST. 

52 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS. 

53 MARINE CORPS ASSAUlT VEHICL~S. 

5~ HARINE CORPS GROUND COME!ATJSUPPORT S'f'STEM. 

BUOOET COMMITTEE CIIAHGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOHIIENOED REQUEST 

~0 '429 

~. 325 

2,991 

12 651 

"' 5.275 

1 ,648 

100 349 

52 781 

5.959 

148.865 

25.365 

BO.H7 

'" 

,oeo 

70.551 

a ,044 

23' 716 

499,961 

21 ,026 

542. 700 

88,734 

20,861 

8~9.217 

196,9~8 

8,115 

T.&OJ 

105,749 

1 ,342 

4, 325 

2,991 

12,651 

1. 782 

5,2Hi 

1 ,646 

83,158 

5, 959 

138,885 

25' 365 

72,477 

"' 1, OBD 

67.551 

8.0~4 

11,736 

~99. 981 

21 ,026 

542,700 

8&, 734 

20,881 

849 277 

188 648 

8' 115 

7.603 

105. H9 

1.H2 

·11 191 

-4 300 

·10,000 

-8,000 

·3.000 

·5,980 

·2 .ODD 

·28,300 
228 

(DOLLIIRS IN Tf-IOUSA~DS] 

55 JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE OEVELOPIIENT, 

~6 COOPERATIVE ENG~GEI'IEHT. 

57 OCEAN ENGINEERING TECH~L()(;Y DEVELOPMENT. 

58 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 

59 ~AVV ENERGY PROGRAM .. 

60 FAC1LlTTES IHPAOVEI'IEtiT. 

61 CHALK CORAL. 

62 NAVY LDO!ST!C PRODUCTIVITY. 

63 RETRACT MAPLE. 

64 LINK PLUMER!/\. 

65 RETRACT ELH. 

66 LINK EVERGREEN. 

67 SPEC I Ill PROCESSES. 

68 NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. 

69 LAND ATTACK TECWNOLOGY 

70 NONLETHAL WEAPONS. 

71 JOINT PRECISIO~ APPROACH AND LANDING SYSHHS .. 

73 DIRECTED ENERGY A~O ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS. 

7~ GEAALO R. FO~O CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER. 

75 REHOTE IIHIEHUNT!NG SYSTEM (RMS),. 

76 TACTICAL AIR OIRECT!ONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASUfi:ES. 

71 ASE SELF-PROTECTION oPTU11ZAHON,. 

78 LX (R) 

79 JOINT COUNTER RADHl CONTROLLED lED ELECTRONIC WARFARE. 

81 SPACE & ELECTROtiiC "'ARFARE (SE"'l ARCHIHCTUREIEMGINE 

82 OFFENSIVE ANTI·SIJRFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELDPI'tENT. 

83 JOINT liGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE ENGTNEERJHG/tiANVFACTURlNG. 

84 ASW SYSTEMS DEVELDPP1ENT - !'liP. 

85 ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPf'IEHT till'. 

TOT,O,L. DE~ONSTRATION 5 VALIDATION. 

BUDGeT COMMITTEE CHANGE ~ROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENDED REOUlST 

" ,399 21 '399 

" "' "· '" ·4,268 

1, 76-t ' 26< -1 ,500 

13.200 13 200 

69,415 55.393 -14,022 

2,588 2.588 

116.301 176, 3(}1 

3,073 3,073 

378,028 378.028 

212.096 "' '" •19,600 

-t2 ,233 " 233 

46. ~04 " "' 25,109 25.109 

9,659 9.6!19 

'" "' 40,912 35,627 -5,285 

54,89fi 41,898 -13,000 

58.898 52,698 -8,000 

43,613 43,613 

21 ,1 10 21 ,110 

~.s5r 5,657 

0,033 4,033 . .f,OOO 

36.859 30,859 ·6.000 

15,227 15,227 

22,393 22' 393 

202.939 161 ,939 

11.~80 9,450 ·2 .000 

6,495 6,495 

J32 "' 

4,591.812 4,398,38!1 ·195,446 
229 

(DOLLARS !~ THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET COIIIH TTEE CtlA'-IGE FROII 

~ECUEST RECOIII'IENDEO REQUEST 

ENCllNEERIIIG & I'IANUFACTUJUIIG OEVELOPIIENT 

" TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT., 2:), 153 25,153 

" OTHER HELO DEVHOPI'IENT. .. 15< 32' 035 -14,119 

" AY-68 AIRCRAFT ENG DEY, " "' 25,372 

" STANDARDS DEVELOPIIENT. 53,712 53.712 

" l'lULTt-lllSSIOH HELICOPTER UPORAOE OEYELQPIIENT. n ,434 11 .434 

" AIR/OCEAN EQU!PI'IENT ENGINEERING. 2' 16. 2,164 

" P-3 IIOOERIIIZATION PROORAH. 1. 710 1 '710 

93 WARF~E SUPPORT SYSTEM. 9.094 9,094 

" TACTICAL COIIIIANO SYSTEH. 70.249 62.HO -a' 108 

" ADVANCED HAW~EVE, "' ,., 1<46.200 -47,000 

" H-1 UPGRADES. .. , 115 •U,115 

" ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS. " "' 23.227 

" V-22A .. 61 '249 54' 249 ·1 .000 

" AIR CREW SVSTEIIS DEVELOPI'IENT. 15,014 15,014 

100 EA-18. 18.730 1&,730 

101 ELECTRONIC WARFARE OEVELOPI'IEHT. 28,742 211.H2 

10' VH·7lf• EXECUTIVE HElD OEVElOP~Eh'T. 388.086 388.086 

103 NEXT OENERATJON JAIIIIER (NGJ) 246.856 230.133 -16,123 

10< JOINT TACTICAl AAOIO S"STf~ - NAW (JTRS·NAVY) .. 7' t06 7' 106 

105 SURFACE C~BATAHT CO~AT SYSTEM ENGINEERHIG 168,112 179 "' -10,000 

106 LPO·H CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION .. "' "' 1" SIIALL 01AI1fTER 80118 (SOB). 71 ,8411 " .849 -10,000 

108 STANOARO IIISSllE I MPROVEHENTS. &3.1118 U.188 

"' AIRBORNE HCII 38.941 38,Q41 

"' H-'RlNE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE ELECTRONIC WARFARE 7' 832 7.832 

11' N-'VAL INTEGRAT£[1 FiRE CONTII:OL-COUNTER AIR SYSTEIIS ENG. 15.283 15,263 

112 FUTURE UNIIANNEO CARRIER-BASED STRIKE SYST£11. 403,017 403,011 

"' ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS. 20.409 20,4011 

"' SSN-666 A.NO TRIDENT IIODERNlZI\TlON. 71 .565 11 '585 

115 AIR CONTROL. 29.037 29,037 

"' StHP80ARO AVIATION 5YSTEI1S. 122.083 122,063 

118 ALWANCEO IIJSS!LE DEFENSE AAD"R (AHOR) SYSTEH 144.706 127,567 ·11.13& 

"' NEW DESIGN SSN 72.695 er.aas +15 000 
230 

(Dill LARS IN THOUSANO,\;) 

120 SUSAARl~E r"CHCAL WARFARE SYSTE" 

121 SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/LIVE FIRE TSE 

122 NAVY TACTic.A.l COIIPUTER RESOURCES. 

123 VIRGINIA PAYLOAD IIOOULE (VPH). 

124 MINE DEVELOPMENT 

125 L IGHTWEJGHT TORPEDO OEVELOPH~NT, , 

126 JOINT SERVICE f)(PLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPIIEMT. 

121 PEI!SONNEL, TIIA!NING, 511\UlATIO'-'. AND HUMN FACTORS. 

1~8 JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SVSTEH$ 

129 SHill SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & COIHROL). 

130 $HlP SELF DEFENSE (ENGA.GE: H"RD KILL). 

131 SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE SOFT K!LL!EW) 

132 lNTELLIGEm::E ENGHIEERING 

133 MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT 

134 NAVIGATION liD SYSTE/1. 

135 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER fJSF) EIIO. _ 

136 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER [J$1'). 

137 INFORHAT!ON TfCHNOLQGV OMLOPt!EMT 

131! lNFORIIAHON TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPI'IENT. 

139 CH-SJK. 

140 SHIP TO SMORE CONNECTOR (SSC). 

141 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND 111SS1LE (JAGM). 

142 11ULTI-HtSSlON HMITIHE AllltRAFT (11HA). 

143 000-1000. 

144 TACTICAL COHMNO SYSTEH - HIP .• 

145 TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SVSTEHS. 

146 SPECIAL APPLTCATIONS f>ROGAAH. 

TOTAL. ENGINEERING ! 1'1ANUFACTURING OEVELOPIIENT. 

BUOGET COIIIIJTTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOIIIIENOED REQUEST 

38,985 

48,470 

3,935 

132,602 

19,067 

25' 280 

8,985 

7,669 

4.400 

56' 889 

96' 937 

134,.5-64 

"' 8.287 

29' 504 

513.021 

516,456 

2.887 

86,317 

573.187 

87.815 

6' 300 

308.037 

202. 522 

1 ,011 

10.357 

23 '975 

5,419,108 

38,985 

48,470 

3,935 

132,602 

14,067 

35.280 

8,985 

7,869 

4,400 

56' 889 

81 ,937 

121 .339 

'" 27.287 

29' 504 

513,021 

516,456 

2.887 

66,317 

573.187 

55.026 

6,300 

319.037 

202,522 

1,!111 

10,357 

23' 975 

5,298,605 

-5,00(1 

+1!1,000 

-15,000 

-13.22S 

+19.000 

·12.789 

+11 .ooo 

-120,503 
231 

(UUli.AI!~ IN lllliU:>ANU::Oj 

ROUE IIANAGEIIENT SUPPORT 

147 THREAT STIIULA.TOR DEVELOPI'IEHT 

148 TAR[;eT SYSTEIIS OEVEL:}f>IIENT. 

149 MJOR UE INVESTMENT 

150 JOINT THEATER AIR A"'O HISSILf DEFENSE ORGANllATION. 

151 STUDIES .-.NO ANALYSIS SUPPORT • NAVY. 

152 CENTER FOR NAVAL Atli,LYSI:S. 

154 TECHNICAL INFORHAT!ON SERVICES. 

155 !'IANI\GEHENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT .. 

156 STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT. 

157 RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 

156 ROT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT, 

1~9 TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 

180 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY. 

161 NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC \oiARFARE I SEW) SUPPORT. 

152 SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT 

183 IIARINE CORPS PROGRM WIDE SUPPORT,. 

TOTAl ROUE 'IAIIIAGEHENT SUPPORT 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS OEVELOPI'IENT 

168 UNMAMNEO C0~8AT AIR VE~lClf ~UCAV) AOVANCEO COMPONENT 

169 MRJNE CORPS DATA SYSTEJ'tS 

170 CMRtER ONSOARO DEUVERY FOLLOW ON. 

tn STRATEGIC SUB I WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT 

173 SSBN SECURITY TECI-!NOlOGY PROGRAM. 

17~ SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARI'ARE DEVELOPHEIIT. 

175 NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUIHCATIONS. 

176 RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT),. 

177 F/A.\8 SQUADRONS. 

179 I'LEET TELECOMMUHICATtONS (TACTICAL). 

180 SURFACE SUPPORT. 

1111 TOHAHAWl( AltO TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (THPC). 

182 INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM. 

183 AHPHIBtO\IS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS. 

184 OROUHO/AIR TASK 0Rlf'"E0 RADAR. 

BUDGET COMMITTEE CHAHGE FROM 

REOUEST RECOMMENDED REQUEST 

45.272 

79.718 

123,993 

'. 960 

8, 296 

45 752 

'" 72 070 

"' 73 '033 

136,304 

336.286 

18 658 

505 

8,325 

11.866 

911 .151 

35 949 

e .873 

96.943 

30.057 

4.509 

13,676 

12,490 

76,216 

21.281 

2,678 

32.385 

39,371 

4.609 

99,106 

45,272 

86,718 

123,993 

4,960 

8,296 

12.070 

3,237 

13,033 

136,304 

336.286 

1a,esa 

2,50~ 

a. 325 

17 868 

~s. 9411 

8, 873 

114' 525 

30,057 

~. 509 

13,676 

9,480 

86,218 

27.261 

2, B7B 

27,685 

29,471 

4.609 

119,106 

-13,000 

·13,000 

·2,416 

·3,000 

+10.000 

·4 700 

·9,900 
232 

I DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUOGET COII~ITTEE CHANGE FROit 

REQI.IEST REC01111EiiOEO REQUEST 

--------------

'" CONSOliDATED TRAIHII'G SYSTEMS OEVELOP11ENT 39.922 39.922 

"' CRYPTOUlD !C 0 !RECT SUPPORT. l .157 1. 157 

'" ELECTRONIC IOARF.I.RE {EW) READIJ.IESS SUPPORT. " "' 16,567 -5,500 

'" MARH l IIPROVEIIENT. " "" 17. 420 

"' TACTICAL DATA LINKS. '" ,208 133,594 

"' SURFACE ASW COIIBAT SYSTEM JMTEGRATlOH, " "' 26' 366 

"' HK-48 ADCAP. " 952 2~.952 

'" AVJATIO+I !IIPROVEIIENTS. 108,936 75,037 -31 ,899 

'" OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR PO\o/ER SYSTEH$ 104,023 104,023 

"' ~RTNE CORPS COH~UNICAT!ONS SYSTEMS .. " "' 74,258 ·3 '140 

'" COI1t10H AVIATION COI'II\ANO AND CONTROL SYSTEI'I " "' 32.495 

"' MARINE CORPS GROUND CtJI\BATISUPPORTlNO ARIIS SYSTEMS 156,628 142,076 -1-4.550 

"' MR!NE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT. 20 '999 20.999 

"' USIIC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (HTP) 14,1T9 14,179 

200 TACTICAL Alii HlSSILES,. 47,258 47,258 

"' ADVANCED MEDIUII ~ANGE AU~- TO-AIR IIISSILE (AHRAAMI. 10' 210 10,210 

"' SATELLIH COHHIINICATIONS (SPACEI. 41 ,82!1 41 ,829 

"' CONSOLTOHEn AFLOAT NETI«lRK ENTERP~ISE SERVICES. 22, 7SO 22,780 

'" INFOFl:f'IATION SYSTEMS SECL/Fl:ITY PRO(;Fl:AI't. 23.053 23' 053 

"' 1.\0HCCS/OLOBAL COHIIANO AND CON"fROL SVSTHI '" '" 

"' NAVY f'IETEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (l'tETOC). "' 350 

"' JOINT HILITA~Y INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS,. 6, 166 6,166 

"' TACTICAL UNHIINNED AERIAL VEHICLES 8 '505 8,505 
233 

iOD~I.ARS U< TIIOUSAJtOS) 

216 DISTRIBUTED CDM~ON GROUND S'ISTEIISISURFACE $\'STEMS. 

217 DISTRIBUTED CGMIION GROUND SVSTEHSISURFACE SVSTEMS. 

218 RQ-4 UAV,. 

219 110-8 UAV. 

2:20 RQ-il UAV. 

222 SHALL !LEVEL II) TACTICAL UAS (STUASLO) 

:223 RQ-21A 

224 IWLH-lNTELLIGE~E SENSOR OEVHOPMENT 

225 UNMANNED AERIAL 5\'STEitS (UAS) PAYlOADS (111P). 

t28 I'IOOEllHG AND $li'!ULATJ011' SUPPORT, 

227 DEPOT "-'<!NTENANCE (NON-IF) 

228 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 

229 MilA IllitE TECIINOLOGY l liAR I TECH). 

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT,. 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY. 

BUDGET COIIIHTTH CHANGE !'ROt! 

REQUEST RECOIIIIENDED REQUEST 

11 ,613 

18,146 

498' 003 

47.294 

'" 4,813 

8,192: 

22.559 

2,000 

4. 719 

21. 168 

37. 169 

4,347 

123,344 

1 '162,684 

, 1 ,613 

18,146 

463.003 

.(3,294 

'" 4,813 

8,192 

16.864 

2, 000 

4. 719 

21. 18! 

37,169 

4,347 

1.991,128 

1 '162,684 

16,266,335 15.871,770 

-35,000 

-4.000 

·3.895 

. 386.566 
234 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

(In th<:>uund• <:~f dollars] 

Budget Comrt~lttH C~nge from 

·-· 

Requnt Recommeru:led RtcqUKt 

OCEAN WARFIGHTI"--Q ENVIRONMENT APPLIED 

" RI!SI!ARCH 4&,388 BS,JU: 20,000 

Program •ncrease- AGOR mk!-life reftl 20,000 

FUTURE. NAVAL CAPABILITI!S ADVANCED 

" TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 170,788 176,086 5,3(10 

Program rncr!!asa . eutomaled critical care &ystem 5.300 

FUTURE NAVAL CAPABIUTIES ADVANCED 

" TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT l6$,1U 281,144 8,000 Program increaie • ASW reeearch 5,000 

" WARFIGI-ITER PROTECTION ADVANCED TeCHNOLOGY 4,83& -'U3B 315,700 

Program increase -bone marrow regi~tl)' progrJm 31,500 

Tact1cal athlete program- transfer lrorr> OM.OW 4,200 

SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE 

" COUNTERMEASURES 100,34t 83,168 •17,191 SS0-94 tra•ner program groW'III -1.500 

Unmanned surl&ee vehicle developmell1 orogram delay -3,600 

Unma~ned surface vehicle euPPOrl program growth -1,000 

Unmanned surf11ce yehoele flig~\2 11head ol need -7,891 

LMQe diameter unmanned underw~~lef veh•ele wpi)Qrt 

PfDijram grOJW!h -3.200 

" SURFACE SHIP TORPEOO DEFENSE 62.781 48.411 

Program ex~t~:u!IQn -4,300 ""' 

" PILOT FISH 148,865 138,8455 ·10,000 

CIII!Stfied adjustment -\0,000 

" RETRACT JUNIPER 80,417 72,477 4,000 

Classtfr~d adtustment -8,000 

" AOVANCEO SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 70,551 87,551 -3,000 ste~lth fund•ng c!lrr;Qver -3.000 

" SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & fEAS1B1L!TY STUDIES 23,716 17,731 ·5,980 Program e~ecution -~.980 

" LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP U,734 86,734 ·2,000 

Supp<~r.tundlng growth -2.000 

" LlnORAl COMBAT SHIP MISSION PACKAGES 1116,t43 161,64t ·21,300 ManaQemenl fundi'"'" growth ·3,000 

Program e:«!culion -25.300 

" COOPERAliVE ENGAGEMENT 43,571 39,310 -4,268 Program execution -3,268 

Common arra~ ~lock antenna program grov<lh ·1,000 

" OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DeVELOPMENT 7,764 1,%64 -1,500 

Submarine reacue ays\em program delay -1.500 
235 

Budget Coll'tmlnee Ch•nge !rom 

R-1 R<tquHt R~teommended Flequnt 

.. NAVY ENEFIGV PROGRAM 6t,of1& &5,393 ·14,022 

Program eocu~on -5,611 

T9ctocal fueJs program WOW'h ·1.700 

0>r$eled ene']Y program growth -2.711 

Aircraft energy conservlll•on pr<J!Iram grow1h ~.000 

.. LINK f>LUMERIA '272,096 262,4fll -111,&00 

Clsalf!foe~ adj~tmenl -1!1.600 

" NONLETHAl. WEAPONS 40,912 n.m -$,215 

Program e.>cecutian -$.285 

71 JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS 54,896 41,896 ·13.000 

Program e~ecubon -13.000 

" DIRECTED ENERGY AHO ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS IIB,IK 52,198 -6,000 ~llllgun deveillpmenl excess suppcrt -6,000 

" ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION a, on 4,033 -4,000 

Program grow1h ~-"" 

" LX (AI 36,H9 30,658 .e,ooo l.)( (R] deveJopmeot program grcwth -6,000 

OFFENSIVE ANTI.SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON 

" DEVELOPMENT 202,83t 111,931 -41,000 

Sup[l<lrt coat growth -10,000 

Program d~ay -30,000 

lnerem$nlll ehe:ad ol neot(l -I ,000 

JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICl.! 

" ENGtNEERINGJMANUFACTURING 11,450 ..... •2,000 

PrOQr~m ma~agemem e:w~~SS 10 "'quirem~mt -2,000 

" OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT 46,1&4 3M35 ·14,11t H-$0 devel¢pmenl· PfQ9•am de~y -3,064 

E~eu11~e ~eliCQpler suwort progr!lffl growlh -5,000 

MH-XX ~h{lad of nee,; -0,055 

.. TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM 70,248 62,140 -1,108 

Program ax.eul10n -5,108 

54-bil arehllecture phasing -3,000 

" ADVANCED HAWKEYE 193,700 1U,200 -47,000 

ln-ft•ghl reluehng program ~s1ructure -27,000 

Tact•calte.f'90ting leehnology progre;m growth -5,000 

S>JWOrl hJnding growth -15,000 

" V-22A 61,249 54,!U9 -'/',000 

PrQgram growth -7.000 

'" NEXT GENERATION JAMMER 246,866 230,7:J3 ·16,123 

Program ex&Wtion -16,123 

SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM 

'" ENGINEERING 189,112 179,112 -10.000 

Sur1aca combatant development and inlegrat\orl suppol'l 

program growth ·10,000 
236 

Bud~ C:ommhtee Chan;. from ... Reqvn.t Aec:omrnended Reque1t 

'" SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SOB) 71,849 ,,..., -10,000 

Small d~amelll!< bOtl'b II ontegratio" prti!;IO"iim griiWih -10,000 

'" ADVANCED MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR SYSTEM 1U,70& 127,1561 ·17,130 Progrllfl'l e~ecvtion -17,13S 

"' NEW DESIGN SSN 72,$15 87,88& 115,1)(10 

Prog<em incree~ • 51T1all bVliiness technoiO!lY trtserlion 15.000 

"' MINE DEVELOPMENT 10,017 14,067 -&,000 

Mine De>.etopment program growth -5,000 

"' LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT 2.5,280 315,280 10,000 Program increase- smell bustr~ess technology tnsertooo IIJ,OOO 

'" SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) 9&,937 81,9!7 ·1fi,I)OO 

ESSM block II n&k reduction -15,000 

'" SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOfT KILUEW) U4.5e4 121,339 -13,226 SEWIP block 3 preliminary des~n contract delay -13.225 

"' MEDICAL OE\II!LOPMENT Ut7 27,287 18,000 

Program mcrn"- wound cere research \3,000 

Program increue. denUII reaearch 6.000 

1-40 SHIP TO 8HO~E CONNECTOR 67.116 5&,026 ·12,711 

Progr~m e~a<l\JIIon ·12.789 

142 MUL li-MISSIOH MAFUTIME ,ltiRCRAFT 308,037 319,037 11,000 

Sporal 2 government ~yatem$ engineering program growth •. ooo Program 1ncrene. small busirren technology on&erhon 1S.OOO 

148 TARGET SYSTEMS OEIIELOPMI!NT 79,718 66,718 ·13,000 

GQM-173A program Otley ·10.000 

BQM-177A progrem restructure -3,000 

172 STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT 9U43 94,625 -2,418 

Program exKV~on -12,418 

Progrem 1ncrea~~e • m1saile comjlcnent development 10.000 

"' RAPID TECHNOLOGY TAANSITION (RTT) 12:.410 ..... ~ .... TIPS program growth -3.000 

"' FIA-18 SQUADRON$' 76,211 86,216 10,000 

Program 1ncrane- dval mode B<iiT'slone rnlegrelicw"r 10.000 

TOMAH"WK AND TOMAHAWI< MISSION PLANNING 

"' CENTER 32,385 27,886 -4,700 

Taebcaltcrmf1a....t< AUR program grow1h -4,700 

"' INTt:GRATEO SURVEILLANCE S'ISTEM 3$,371 28,471 -9,900 

Clas.s.i~ed adjUStment ·9,900 

"' ELECTRONIC WARFARE READINESS SUPPORT 22.,067 18,567 -6,.500 

EW/10 countermaasure capabtlity program growth -5.500 

"' TACTlCAL DATA LINKS 151,208 133,594 ·17,514 

Prcgr~m execuloor -\7,614 
237 

Budgat Committee Change ft<lm 

••• Rt!qunt REH:ommanded Request 

"' AVIATION IM~OVEMENTS 10U36 76,037 ~1.819 F-135 improvements ellead of na<ild -31,8!19 

"' MARIJ.IE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS n,l&a 74,258 ·3,140 

AFATDS software dMopment sclladule slip ·1,3<10 

ANfTPS-69 support unjuati~ growth -1,800 

MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAli$UPPORnNG ARMS 

"' SYSTEMS 1u,u• 142,07e -14,550 

AAVauppot1 unjustified growth -1·4.~50 

'" RQ-4 UAV 498,003 463,003 -35.000 

Milestone C delay -35,000 

'" MQ-B UAV 47,294 43,Z&4 

Eng11'!eeni'IQ and technicel servoces progn1m IJrDwlh •.ooo "·"' ,,. MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT 22,1111!1 18,664 -3,695 

Program ex~~\Jiton -3,895 
238 

AMPHIBIOUS COMBAT VEHICLE 

The Committee is supportive of the Marine Corps' Amphibious 

Combat Vehicle (ACV) program, which is being developed to replace the rapidly aging Amphibious Assault Vehicle. However, the 

Committee is aware that the strategy for the ACV program is currently being revised due to a re-evaluation of requirements, estimated costs, and schedule, and that a contract award is unlikely 

to occur in fiscal year 2015. Therefore, the Committee recommends 

a rescission of $78,800,000 from the total $122,967,000 appropriated in the Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014, 

but recommends fully funding the fiscal year 2015 request of 

$105,749,000. This will allow the Marine Corps to immediately implement the ACV acquisition strategy once the path forward has 

been finalized, without unnecessarily reserving resources that 

could be used for higher priority items. The Committee will continue to support the ACV program as the strategy is refined in future budget submissions and looks forward to continuing discussions with the Marine Corps regarding the ACV program progress. 

AUTOMATED TEST AND RE-TEST 

The Committee recommends fully funding the Navy's request for 

$8,115,000 for the Automated Test and Re-test effort. According to 

a recent Navy report, funding for this program will continue 

throughout the future years defense plan. The Committee understands that this program will provide significant savings to many 

of the software intensive programs currently in use, as well as 

those in development, and looks forward to tracking the progress 

of this effort in future years as the Navy provides additional fundmg. 

LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP TRAINING 

Due to the small crew size and operational concept of the Littoral 

Combat Ship (LCS), the LCS Total System Training Architecture 

is a vital component to the success or failure of the LCS program. 

Limited at sea training opportunities will exist for the crews of the 

LCS so they need to maximize their shore based training to the 

greatest extent possible. As the training architecture is such an important component of the LCS program, the Committee is puzzled 

as to why the Navy has reduced the funding for this effort from the 

appropriated levels over the last several years. The budget justification material shows that nearly $100,000,000 has been removed from the LCS training system budget over the last three 

years. This large reduction could very possibly jeopardize the readiness of the LCS crews as they man ships and begin to take them 

to sea. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Navy 

to ensure the entire fiscal year 2015 appropriated amount of 

$19,547,000 is allocated towards the LCS Total System Training 

Architecture. 

ARCTIC CENTER OF EXCELLENCE 

The Navy's most recent Arctic Roadmap provides direction and 

recommendations to enhance the Navy's ability to operate in the 

arctic region. The roadmap recommended the establishment of an 
239 

Arctic Center of Excellence and the development of an arctic engagement plan focused on partnerships with other stakeholders in 

the arctic region, both public and private. The Committee believes 

that these recommendations go hand in hand since the Arctic Center of Excellence would support these partnerships. The Committee 

encourages the Secretary of the Navy to establish the Arctic Center 

of Excellence to support arctic-related training, operations, and scientific research. Further, the Secretary of the Navy is encouraged 

to consider locations for the Center that could bring together elements from public and private communities, including academia, 

who can contribute to advancing the nation's interests in the arctic 

reg10n. 

WOUND CARE RESEARCH PROGRAM 

The Committee recommends $13,000,000 for the wound care research program. The Committee is aware of the continued need to 

develop wound care technology to improve treatment for combat 

wounded servicemembers. The Committee is also aware of the challenges associated with treating wounds, particularly in combat environments, and the risk of developing bacteria, biofilms, and other 

infections. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Navy to 

research technologies that can prevent biofilm formulation, bacteria, and infections in combat wounds. 

AUTOMATED CRITICAL CARE SYSTEM 

Trauma care for Marines and sailors deployed in remote locations or on ships poses a serious challenge to Navy caregivers. The 

Committee is extremely concerned with the potential deterioration 

of these injured servicemembers while being stabilized, evacuated, 

or transported to a facility possessing high-level medical care. Coordinating and providing care while safely transporting injured patients with life threatening conditions strains medical personnel 

and other mission resources. Incorporation of state-of-the-art medical device technologies with automated decision controls may well 

mean the difference between life and death and will have a significant impact in medical care for both the military and civilian communities. The automated critical care system (ACCS) being developed by the Navy has the potential to be such an innovative medical device. The Committee fully supports the ACCS and provides 

an additional $5,300,000 to accelerate the development effort. 

P-8A OPEN ARCHITECTURE 

There are numerous benefits to utilizing open architecture in today's software intensive weapon systems. It enables low cost capability insertion, allows numerous capabilities to be supported by a 

common hardware set, and allows the sharing of information across 

different platforms. The Committee is aware of the Navy's ongoing 

effort to develop an open architecture system for the P-8A Poseidon multi-mission maritime aircraft. The Committee strongly encourages the Secretary of the Navy to continue this development effort and to incorporate open architecture into the P-8A as soon as 

possible. 
240 

AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION 

The Committee provides $10,000,000 as requested for aircraft 

systems modernization. The Committee is aware that a major modernization effort is the development of technology needed to support the transition of highly integrated photonics into naval aircraft systems. This funding will support requirements study, technology maturation, and system design and demonstration of general-purpose avionics networks. The Committee understands that 

this work will have a positive impact on life cycle costs associated 

with maintaining and upgrading networks aboard Navy aircraft. 

Accordingly, the Committee expects that this effort will continue to 

receive full funding in fiscal year 2016 and over the future years 

defense plan. 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, AIR 

FORCE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation . ............................ $23,585,292,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .................... .................. 23,739,892,000 

Committee recommendation ,,,,,,,,,,, ................. 23,438,982,000 

Change from budget request ....................... ................. -300,910,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $23,438,982,000 

for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force. The 

total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following 

program in fiscal year 2015: 
241 

(DOLLARS IN THOUS.o.ND$) 

RESEMI:CH, ot::VELOPHENT, TEST & EVAL, AIR FORCE 

BASIC RESEARCH 

DEFfJtSE RESEARCH SCIENCES. 

UNIVERSIT'!' RESEARCH INJTIATlVES. 

HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INI'l'IATIVES 

TOTAL, B.f.SIC RESEARCH. 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

MATERIALS. 

"-fP:DSPACE 'o'EHICLE TECHNOLOGIES 

HIJHAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH. 

AEROSPACE PROPULSION. 

.-.ERDSPACE SENSORS. 

SPACE TECHNOLOGY •• 

\0 CON'If.NTIONAL HUNITIONS 

11 DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOlOGY. 

12 DOMINANT lNFORHATION SCIENCES AND HETHOrlS. 

13 HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH 

TOTAl, APPLIED RESEARCH 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY OEVELOPHENT 

H AIW ... HCEO 1\ATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS 

15 SUSTAIN/lENT SCIENCE AND HCHNOlOOY {S&T) 

1~ ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS. 

17 AERDSP,.CE TECHNOLOGY OEV/0£110. 

1 B AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY. 

19 ELECTRONIC COHBAT TECHNOLOG'I. 

20 AOVoi.HCED S'"ACECAAFT TECHNOLOGY. 

21 11AUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (~555). 

22 HUMoi.H EFFECTIVENESS AOVAHCEO TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 

23 CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TEOiNOLOGV. 

24 ADVANCED WEI.P<»>S TECHNOLOOV •. 

25 I'!ANUFACTURlNG TECHNOLOGY PROGRAH. 

26 BATTLESPACE KtrOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT & DE,.ONSTRATION. 

TOTAL, AOVoi.JiCEO HCHNOLOO\' OEVELOPHEHT. 

BUOOET CO~HITTEE CHANGE FROH 

REIJUEST RECOHHENOED REQUEST 

314.482 

1~7 .0711 

12,9211 

105.680 

10~. 747 

81 ,1157 

172.550 

118.343 

98.229 

87,387 

125.1155 

1~7 .789 

37,4116 

1 ,081 '133 

32 177 

15,8(10 

34 '420 

91 .062 

124.238 

4T .602 

69,026 

14,0]1 

21 '788 

42' 048 

23,5~2 

42,772 

35,315 

593,817 

314.482 

127,079 

12.929 

454,490 

110.680 

105.747 

116,957 

172.550 

118,343 

91 .229 

87.387 

125' 95!1 

147' 789 

37 496 

1.094.133 

39.677 

15. BOO 

34.420 

91 ,082 

12(.236 

47,802 

63.026 

14.031 

21 '788 

42' 0~8 

23,542 

52.772 

35,315 

805.317 

+15,000 

·1 .ooo 

+13.000 

+7.500 

-1;1,000 

+10,000 

+11 .500 
242 

(O<IllARS IN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGt T COI"U TTH CI'!J\IIG£ FROII REQUEST ~ECIJIIIIHIOED REQUEST 

-----------------

AOVAifCEO COIIPONENT OEVELOI>ME"T 

" INTELLlGEHCE A.OV ... NCEO DEVELOPMENT. 5,408 5, 408 

" SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY 6,075 6, 075 

32 COI'\IJ.AT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY. 10,1180 10,980 

" NATO RESEARCH A"'O OEIIELOPMENT 2,392 2, 392 

" INTERitATTONAL $1l'11CE COOPEAAT!V£ R&D .• '" "' 

" SPACE PROTECTIOll PROGRAK (SPP) 32,313 30' 855 -I' 358 

" INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC HISSJLE 30' 885 JO,BBS 

" POLLUTION PRE\IEiffiON (DEH/VAL) 1. 798 1 '798 

" LONG RANGE STRIKE. 913,728 913,728 

" TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2.869 12.669 +10,000 

" WEAT11ER SATELLITE FOLLOW-ON. )9,901 39,901 

" F-35 '"' 4.~76 -~ ,916 

" TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM 59,004 59.004 

" NEXT GENERATION AIR OOIIINANCE 15,722 15.722 

" THREE DJIIENSIONAL LOUG·RAAGE AADAR 88,825 88,825 

" NAVSTAR GlOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEit (USER EQUIP11ENTI, 156.659 156.659 

-----·-····· TOTAL, ADVANCED CDitPDNENT DEVELOP/tENT 1 ,372' 166 1,37$,834 +3,666 
243 

(DOLL11RS IN THOUSANDS) 

ENG!NEERUG & MANUFACTURI!OG DEVELOPMENT 

59 SPE([ALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLTG!1T TRATNTt;G. 

60 ELECTRONIC \o/1\RFAAE OEVELOP11ENT. 

61 TACTICAL OATA METWORI(S ENTERPRISE. 

G2 PHYSICAL SECURITY EOUIPMENl .. 

63 SKALl OIMIETER SOHD (SOD). 

64 COUNTERSPACE SVSTEHS. 

85 SPACE SlTVATION AWARENESS SYSTEl'tS. 

66 SPACE FENCE 

e7 AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK 

68 SPACE &ASEO INFAARED SYSTEM (SB!RS) HIGH EMD 

es ARf'\AHENTIORONANCE OEYfLOP11ENT. 

70 SVBMUNJTIONS 

71 AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT. 

72 LlFE SUPPORT SYSTEHS 

n COMBAT TRA!N!~G RANGES 

?4 ROCKET ENGINE DEVELOPMENT (SPACE). 

75 F-35 - El'tO 

7e LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON 

79 ICBH FUZE MOOERNilAT!ON. 

eo JOINT TACTICAl NE"NORK CEIITER (JTNC), 

e1 F-22 IIODERIIIZAHON lNCREHENT 3.28. 

82 GROUND ATTACK \.JEAPQNS FUZE DEVELOPHENT, 

63 NOT GENERATlON AEI'!lAL REFUELING AIRCRAFT KC·46. 

B4 ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING 

65 CSIIR HH·60 RECAPITALIZATION. 

86 HC/HC-130 RECIIP RDT&E. 

87 AOVAI<ICED EHF "ILSATCOII (SPACE). 

88 POLAR ~llSATCOII fSPACE!. 

89 WIOEBAND GLOBAL SATCOII (SPACE) 

90 AIR AND SP,I,CE OPS CENT(R 10.2. 

91 8-2 DEFENSIVE IIANAGEMEKT SYSTEM. 

BUDGET COIIMITTEE CHAMGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMMENOEO REQUEST 

13 '324 

, ,965 

39 '110 

3, 926 

6$' 759 

23 746 

'" 214 131 

30' 667 

319 501 

31.112 

2' 543 

46 340 

'" 10,129 

563,037 

4,938 

59' 826 

" 173,647 

5,332 

778,937 

8,201 

7,497 

314,376 

103,652 

31 .~25 

85,938 

98.7ee 

13' 324 

1' 966 

39. 110 

3, 926 

68,759 

23,476 

9, 462 

200, \31 

30' 687 

309' 501 

31' 112 

2,543 

8,854 

10,1211 

220' 000 

563,037 

3. ~38 

29.828 

" 173,6~7 

5,332 

766,037 

8,201 

100,000 

7' 497 

298.038 

I 03 552 

23 925 

85 938 

98,768 

·270 

-14,000 

-10,000 

~220 '000 

·I .500 

-10,000 

-16.340 

-7,500 
244 

(DOLLARS JN THUUSANUS) 

112 NUCLEAR "'EAPDNS HOOEANIZATION. 

94 FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAJIIING. 

95 NEXTGEN JSTARS. 

TOTAL, ENGINEERING & HANIJFACTIJRTNG OEVHOPHENT. 

ADT&E f\I.NAGE11EHT SUPPORT 

97 THREAT SIIIULATOR DEVELOPMENT. 

98 IIAJOR T&E INVESTHENT .. 

99 RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE. 

101 INITIAL llPEAATtONAL TEST & EVALUATION. 

102 TEST AND EVALUATli)N SUPPORT. 

103 ROCKET SYSTEHS LAUNCH PROGRAII (SPACE). 

104 SPACE TEST PROGAAH (STP) 

105 FACiliTIES RESTORATION & !100ERNIZATION • TEST 5 EVAL. 

106 FACILITIES SUSTATNIIENT -TEST AND EVAUIATrON SUPPORT., 

107 REOUIAEHENTS ANALYSIS AND I'IATIJRAT!ON. 

\08 SPACE TEST AND TRA!NIHG RANGE DEVELOPMENT. 

110 SPACE AND HlSSlLE CENTER (SHC) CTVlltAN WORKFORCE 

111 ENTERPRISE lNFORHATION SERVICES (EISI 

112 ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

113 ElECTROIIIC ACQUISITION SERVICES ENVIRONMENT. 

11~ tJENERt\L Sl(ILL TRAINING 

TOTAL, ROT&E AANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

SUOGET COMl'IITTEE CHANGE FRO~ 

REQUEST RECO~l'IEMDEO REQUEST 

1118,357 193,357 .s ,000 

8,8]\ 8, 831 

73,088 73,088 

3,337.~19 3,560,809 +223' 390 

24.~18 24,418 

" "' 47,232 

JO .. , 30. ~·3 

" '" 12,266 

"' "' 889,509 

34. 384 34.384 

21 ,1(11 21,HI1 

48,1155 46' 955 

32 '965 32.'*'5 

13.850 13,650 

" "' 19.~12 

'" .727 177,800 ·3,92T 

4 '938 4.938 

18,844 18,6~4 

1 '425 1 ,425 

3, 790 3' 790 

1. 183, 199 I, 179.272 .J ,927 
245 

I DOLLARS IN T~USANOS) 

OPERATIONAL SYSTfMS DEVELOPMENT 

115 GPS Ill OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT 

111 WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE. 

118 JOINT DIRECT ATTACI< MUNITION, 

119 AIR FORCE INTEGRATED MlllTARY HUNAN RESOURCES SYSTE'I. 

120 ANTI· TMPER TECMNilLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY 

122 11-52 SOUAORONS. 

123 AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE 111SS1LE (ALCH). 

1 :1..4 S -111 SQUADRONS. 

125 B-2 SQUADRONS. 

126 M!NUTEHAM SQUAOII:ONS., 

127 STRAT VIAR PLANNING SYSTEM· USSTII.ATCOH. 

1.28 NIGHT FIST USSTRATCOH. 

130 REG!O"'ISECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER ""DERHIZAHON. 

131 SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRUCOII SPACE ACTIVITIES 

133 ~-9 UAV 

136 F-16 SQUADRON$ 

137 F-15E SIJIJADRONS. 

138 i'IAHNEO OESTRUCTlVE SUPPRESSION. 

13Q F-22 SllUAORONS .. 

140 F-35 SQU,.I.OIUINS. 

141 TACTICAL AIM IHSS!LES .. 

142 ADVANCED "EOIIJII RANGE AIR-TO-AIR I'!ISSILE IMRAA~). 

14~ F-15 EPAWSS. 

145 CO~BAT RESCUE AND RECOVER". 

146 i;O~Boi.T RESCUE PARARESCUE. 

147 A.F TENCAP 

HB PRECISION "-TTACK SYSTE~S PROCURE~ENT. 

149 COMPASS CA.LL 

150 AIRCR,O,FT ENGJNf CO~P<l'IENT lHPROVE~ENT PROGRAM 

BUDGET COIIItlTTEE CHANGE FROII 

REQUEST RECOIIIIEIIOED REQUEST 

299' 760 

2,46~ 

90.218 

34.81f. 

55,457 

"' 

5,353 

131 .~80 

139,109 

35' 603 

" 1,51:2 

3, 134 

170.396 

133.105 

261 ,969 

14,831 

156,662 

43' 666 

29.739 

82,195 

sa, 944 

5,095 

'" 5.812 

1 ,081 

14.411 

109,664 

299.760 

2.000 

2,.(69 

90.218 

34,815 

55.~57 

"' 4,353 

105,680 

139,109 

35' 603 

" 1 .522 

3,134 

170.396 

133,105 

251,989 

14,831 

151 ,362 

43.666 

29,739 

82,195 

ea,eH 

5.095 

'" 5.812 

1 .081 

14,411 

94, 177 

+2 .000 

-I ,000 

·25,900 

·10.000 

·15,487 
246 

(DOLLARS JN TI10U5""05] 

"' JOINT AU·TD·SURFACE STANDOFF IIISSILE !J.It.SSII). 

"' AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC). 

"' CONTROL AND REPt!RTJMG CENTER {CRC).,,, 

"' Alllfi0RNE WIIRNING AND CONTROL SYSTEI't (AWACS) 

'" TACTJCAL AIRBORNE CONTR<IL SVSTEH$ .. 

"' COIIBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEII ACTIVITIES .. 

'" TACTICAL AIR COkTROL PARTY··IIOO 

'" C2ISR TACTICAL OAU. liN!( 

'" OCAPES 

"' SEEK EAGLE. 

'" USAF IIODELING AltO Sli!ULATION 

"' W"RGAII!NG AND SIMULATION CENTERS. 

"' OJSTRTOUTEO TRAINING AND EXERCISES. 

'" IIISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 

"' CvtiER COIIIIANO ACTIVHIES. 

"' ,I,F OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIOHS 

111 AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 

1711 SPACE SUPERIORITY IHTELL IGENCE. 

180 E·48 NAHONAL AlRBOf!NE OPERATIONS CENTER {NAOC). 

181 11JN!ItUII ESSENTIAL EIIEROENCY COIII!Uif!CAHONS NET\o/ORK. 

182 INFORIIATtON SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRA!I., 

183 GLOBAL C0!19AT SUPPORT SVSTEM, 

185 MlLSATCOM TERMINALS. 

187 AIRBORNE SIGJI~T ENTERPRISE. 

190 GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC W.NAGE"£NT (GATM) .. 

193 SATELLITE CONTROL NET\o/CRK !SPACE). 

HI• WEATHER SeRVICE. 

BUDGET CO!IM!TTEE CHANGE FROfl 

REQUEST RECO!IMENOEO REQUEST 

16' 897 15,697 

., .066 •1 .oee 

"' '" 180.804 180,804 

3. 754 3. 754 

7.891 1' &91 

5,891 5,891 

I, 782 1 '782 

'" '" 23.844 23' 844 

16,723 18,723 

5,956 5, 956 

4,457 4, 457 

60.679 60.879 

67,057 67.057 

13.355 13,355 

5.576 5,576 

12,21& 10.897 _, '" 

28,776 1 '700 ·27 ,076 

81 ,035 81 "' 70 .• 97 10.497 

"' 892 

55' 208 49,950 _, "' 

"' , .. 106,78S 

4,157 4,157 

20.806 2D,806 

25,102 25. 1Cl2 
247 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSA~DS) 

BUDGET COI1!!1Hf€ CHANGE FR011 

REQUEST RECOIIIIENDED REQOEST 

... "' .......... 

'" AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, & LANDI Nil SYSTEH (ATC). 23,518 23,516 

"' AERIAL TARGETS 8,639 B. 639 

"' SECIJRIT'I' AMO l~YESTTGATJVE ACTIVITIES .. '" "' 200 ARI'\5 CONTROL l~PLE~ENTATION 13,222 13,222 

"' DEFENSE J[I!NT COI!NTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. '"' 360 

"' SPACE ANO lllSS!LE TEST IINO EVALUATION CENTER .. 3.6H 3,326 -3~6 

"' SPACE WARFARE CENTER. 2,480 2,071 -409 

208 IWTEGAATEO 8JI.OAOCAST SERVICE., '" 6.954 _, ,638 

209 SPACHJFT RANGE SYSTEH (SPACE). " "2 13,462 

2" DRAGON U·2. ~- 511 5,511 

2'2 AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SVSTEI'!S •. 26 "' 36,113 +10,000 

"' I'IANNEtl RECONIIAISSo\NCE SYSTEitS. " "' 13.516 

2>< OJSTRl8UTED COIIIION OROUNO/SURFACE SYSTEIIS. " 2" 27.265 

"' PREDATOR IJAV (J~IP). 1 ,378 1.378 

"' RQ-~ UAV 244,514 244,514 

"' NETWORK·CENTitiC COllo\BORATIVE TARGET (TIARA) 11 ,096 1l ,09fi 

"' COI'II'ION DATA LINK (COL) 36 "' 36, 137 

"' NATO AGS 232 '" 232' 851 

"' 5lJPPORT TO OCGS ENTERPRISE 20 "' 20,216 

"' GPS Ill SPACE SEGI'IENT 2" '" 212,571 

222 JSPOC I'I!SSION SYSTEM. 7:>.779 73,779 

223 RAPID C"BER ACQUISITION .. 4,102 4,102 

"' MUOET OOECTIOM SYSTEM (SPACE). 20' 468 20,488 

226 SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS 11 ,S96 11 '596 

"' CYBE.R Ot'ERATIONS TECHtiOLIJGY DEVELOPMENT •. 4,938 4,938 

226 SHARE!} EARLY WARNING (SE~<~). 1 .212 1 .212 

230 C-5 AlltllFT SQUI<ORONS. 38,773 38,773 

"' C-11 AIRCRAFT. " "' 83.773 

232 C ·130J PROGRAH. 26 "' 26,715 
248 

(DOLLARS HI THOlJS.O.NOS) 

BUDGET CDIIIIITTEE CliANI>E FROII 

RfOUEST RECOIII'IENDEO REQUEST 

----------" 

"' LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COU~TERIIEASURES (LAIRO\). ~.H:? 5,172 

"' I<C-105 "' 2,714 

"' OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT. " '" 27.784 

"' CV-22 " "' 38, 71g 

"' PRESIDENTIAL III!;!CRAFT REPLJICHIEIH (PAR),. " .ooa 1\ ,OOB 

23B SPECIAL TACTICS I COMBAT CONTROL. '"' 8, 405 

"' DEPOT IIAINTENANCE (NON-IF). 1 '407 1 '407 

'" LOGISTICS THFORMATIOM TECHNOLOOY (LCIG!TJ. "" '" 109.885 

'" SUPPORT SYSTEIIS DEVELOPIIENT. 18,209 16,209 

'" OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING '" '" , .. OTiiER PERSONNEl ACTIVITIES '" "' 

'" JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY 2.603 2,803 

"' C IVIL!AN COIIP[NSA liON PROGRAII 1 '589 1 .569 

"' PERSONNEL AOHINJSTRATJON. 5.028 5,026 

"' AlA FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY .. 1 394 1 ,394 

"' FAC ltl TIES OPE RAT ION- -AOIIINISTRATION. "' 3, 798 

'" FINANCIAL ~A.NAGEIIEHT lNFORKATlOH SYSTEI1S OEVHOPI1ENT. 107,314 87,314 ·20.000 

-·-··-····-· ·--········· TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SVSTEIIS DEVELQPIIENT .. 4,276.546 4,174.307 ·102,239 

CL,1,$S[I'"IED PROGRAI'IS .. 11,-U1,120 10,994,620 -446,300 

TOTAl,., RESEARCH, DEVELDPr!ENT. TEST & EVAL, AIR FORCE. . 23.739,892 23,438,962 ·300,910 
249 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[in tho~Junds of Qollare] 

Budget Commltitie Chen;e fi'Om ,_, R!9veat Reco;m~mended ~uest 

• MATERIALS 105,680 110,880 5,000 

Program increase 5,000 

HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH 61.957 96,9!57 1!5,000 

Program oncreau 15,000 

SPACE TECHNOLOGY 98,2.19 91,228 -7,000 

E•cess to need -7.000 

" ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS 32,177 39,$'1'1 7,501J Program Increase 7,500 

" ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY 60,026 63,026 -8,000 

E~cess to need ~.000 

" MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 42,772 !52,772 10.000 Program im;rease 10,000 

" SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) 32,313 3o.95!5 -1,3!58 E~cess to rutecl -1,358 

" TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 2,669 12,669 10,000 

?rGgram increase 10,000 

.. F-3!5- !MD 4,976 0 -4,i76 

Duplicate lundinc .-4,976 

.. COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS 23.746 23,4715 -270 

Mairllain fi.eal year 20141e~~el -270 

" SPACE FENCE 114,131 200.131 -14,000 

Program delay -14.000 

" SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIOM EMD 319,501 309,501 -10,000 

Wida fiald of \fleW test beds -10,000 

" LIQUIO ROCKET ENGINE DEVELOPMENT ISPACE) 220,000 220,000 

Develoo capacity 220.000 

" LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON 4,938 3,436 -1,1500 

E~eeution adjustment -1.500 

79 ICBM FIJZE MODERNIZATION 59,828 29,828 --30,000 

Exerut<on adjustment -30,000 

" KC-46 n&,e37 766,937 ·10,000 

Program deC!oote -10.000 

85 COMBAT RESCIJE HEUCOPTER 100,000 100,000 

Prcg~am increase only for Combal Rescue Helicopter 100,000 

" ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) 314,378 H8.038 -18,340 

SMI exceto growth -18,340 
250 

Budget Commlttft Chenge from 

·-· R~UU! Recommended ~Uell 

.. WIDEBANO GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) 31,426 23,926 -7,$00 

Re$iHerlCY funding exceu to need -7 000 

" NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION 198,357 1113.~7 ~ .... B!!l-12 tatlkil EMO ohaa.e 1 favorab\t! cost variances -5,000 

SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC] CIVILIAN 

110 WORKFORCE 1&1, 727 177,800 -3,1127 

Personnel cost' axce$S to neeo:l -3.927 

117 WIDE AReA SURVEILLANCE 0 2,000 .... Program ii'ICI'Eiese 2,000 

'" B-19 SQUADRONS 5,353 4.3$.3 -1.000 

Exec.,.inn ad)~stment ·1.000 

"' B-2 SQUADRONS 131,580 105,880 •2tl,900 

Fte>cible strike eJ~ect~~on delays -29.400 

Ejecl10fl seal &elelylsustainablllly improl'emenlprogrem 3,000 

"' F-15E SQUADRONS 261,969 261,969 -10,000 

E~e<:ution adjustment -10,000 

"' F-22 SQUADRONS 166,9$2 151,362 -6,&00 

Execlllion ecl)u$tment -5,600 

AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 

"' PROGRAM lOt,S$4 94,177 ·15,-437 

F 136 eng•ne pro11ram ·15,.4a7 

"' $PACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE 12,218 10,897 .1,U1 

Ma•nlai~ r.,cal year ~014 level -1,521 

E""B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER 

'" \NAOC) 28,778 '·"' ·27,078 

Low Frec;uency Transm11 Systom cosl and schadllle -~7.078 

·-

'" MILSATCOM TERMINALS 5UOS 49.950 -6,258 

E~cess to need· FAB·T downselecl deloly -5.~8 

206 SPACE ANO MISSILE TEST AND EVAt.UA'MON CENTER 3,8.74 3,328 _,., Maintain fiscal year 20141evei _,., 

207 SPACE WARFARE CENTER ,, ... '''" .... ~nl11in f•$(;111 year 20141evel ~09 

208 INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE 8,5!J'2 .... ·1,638 

Mainlam fiscalvear 2014 level -1,638 

212 AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 28,113 ~.113 10,000 

Wlde Area Motion Imagery proyram shortfaN 10,000 

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 

'" DEVELOPMENT 107,114 17.114 ·20,000 

E~ecu~cn adju&mern -20.000 

1199 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 11,4-41,120 10,9t4,8'20 ........ 300 

Cla:uified lldju~mef'll ..... 300 
251 

GLOBAL HAWK, U-2, AND HIGH ALTITUDE JSR 

The Air Force's fiscal year 2015 budget request proposes to retain the RQ-4 Global Hawk Block 30 fleet while preparing for the 

divestment of the U-2 fleet in fiscal year 2016. This proposal constitutes a reversal of the Air Force's previous position on the two 

platforms. The Air Force has explained that its reversal primarily 

is based on declining operation and sustainment costs for the Global Hawk, making it a more prudent long-term investment. The 

Committee views the U-2 and the Global Hawk Block 30 as complementary, rather than rival, systems for high altitude intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; at the same time, the 

Committee acknowledges that budget constraints in current law 

have driven the Air Force to choose between the two platforms. 

The Committee is concerned, however, by the Air Force's present 

plan to initiate and complete a precipitous drawdown of the U-2 

fleet in fiscal year 2016. The U-2 possesses flight performance, sensor, and other capabilities that the Global Hawk Block 30 does not 

presently have. Among these U-2 capabilities is carriage of the Optical Bar Camera (OBC), which provides vital imagery enabling 

American support of the Israel-Egypt peace treaty. The Air Force 

to date has not proposed a mitigating solution for the loss of the 

OBC capability after 2016. The Committee understands the Air 

Force is reviewing alternate options for divestment, including the 

option of a temporary mixed fleet of Global Hawks and U-2s beyond fiscal year 2016, in order to address these concerns. 

The Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 provided the Air Force with an additional $10,000,000 to conduct a 

study of the feasibility of adapting U-2 sensors or similar alternatives to the Block 30. The Committee believes that a favorable 

solution to improving the electro-opticaVinfrared capability of the 

Block 30 would involve a sensor that provides imagery intelligence 

comparable to or better than that provided by the SYERS-2 on the 

U-2, including National Image Interpretability Rating Scale score, 

range, field of regard, and area coverage; preserves the ability for 

simultaneous carriage of the synthetic aperture radar on the Block 

30; does not unduly compromise the availability of SYERS-2 units 

for U-2 missions in the event that the Air Force opts for a mixed 

fleet; minimizes the integration work necessary for adaptation to 

the Block 30 using the Sensor Interface Module; and can be developed and procured at a cost not exceeding the "parity" option identified as meeting Air Combat Command sensor attributes in the report of April 2013. The Committee understands that the ultimate 

solution will involve reasonable trade-offs between these parameters. 

In addition, the Committee believes that it is critical to invest in 

upgrades that will provide Block 30 with necessary weather avoidance and anti-icing capabilities; improved sensor capabilities are of 

less consequence if inclement weather remains a significant limiting factor on Block 30 operations, especially in the Pacific Command area of responsibility. 

To date, the Air Force has not presented the Committee with a 

requirements-driven, accountably resourced, and realistically 

scheduled plan for improving capabilities on the Global Hawk 
252 

Block 30 and mitigating the loss of U-2 capabilities such as the 

OBC after fiscal year 2016. The Committee directs the Secretary of 

the Air Force to present such a plan to the congressional defense 

committees prior to taking any action to divest the U-2 fleet. The 

Committee will review the progress of actions by the Air Force in 

this regard when the fiscal year 2016 budget request is submitted, 

and intends to take intervening action against full and immediate 

divestment of the U-2 fleet if such plans are not satisfactory. The 

Committee also notes that the House version of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2014 requires the Air Force 

to produce a transition plan and prohibits the Air Force from taking any steps toward retirement of the U-2. The Committee urges 

the Secretary of the Air Force to use previously apJ>ropriated funds 

to continue critical sustainment programs for the U-2 until divestment of the fleet is authorized by Congress. 

COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER 

The Committee fully supports the Air Force's decision to proceed 

with an acquisition program for a new Combat Rescue Helicopter 

(CRH) despite budget constraints. The CRH will replace the Air 

Force's rapidly aging fleet of HH-60 helicopters for the combat 

search and rescue mission. While the fiscal year 2015 request includes no additional funds for CRH, the Air Force has indicated to 

the Committee that the $333,558,000 provided in the Consolidated 

Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 is sufficient to fund the program through fiscal year 2015 given the adjustments the Air Force 

has made to extend the program schedule. The Committee is aware 

that the Air Force will need to rectify a $436,000,000 shortfall in 

the current future years defense plan to fully fund CRH development, but believes that this cost must be weighed against the considerable costs that likely would be incurred to extend the life of 

the HH-60 fleet should CRH be terminated. The Committee's recommendation includes $100,000,000 for CRH to partially address 

this shortfall and designates these funds as a congressional special 

interest item. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force 

to keep the Committee informed of the progress of the CRH program, including rates of obligation and expenditure. 

NEXT GENERATION JSTARS 

The Committee fully funds the Air Force request for $73,088,000 

to develop a next generation platform for the moving target indicator and battle management command and control (BMC2) missions currently performed by the E-SC JSTARS fleet. The Committee notes that while the program justification submitted with 

the fiscal year 2015 request appears to assume that the BMC2 system, sensor systems, communications systems, and air vehicle will 

be separately competed with the government as the lead system integrator, the Air Force presently is considering alternative acquisition strategies for the new system. Due to the reduction in capability that will result from the retirement of five operational 

JSTARS aircraft in fiscal year 2015, the Committee encourages the 

Secretary of the Air Force to adopt an acquisition strategy for a 

business jet-based integrated solution with mature technologies 

that is consistent with the completed analysis of alternatives, will 
253 

m1mmize development cost and schedule, field new aircraft ahead 

of first planned delivery date in fiscal year 2019, and provide an 

open system architecture to allow for competitively procured future 

upgrades. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to 

brief the congressional defense committees on its selected approach 

not later than 30 days following the approval of the acquisition 

strategy for the Next Generation JSTARS. 

CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY 

The Committee understands that the Joint Program Office (JPO) 

for the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) intends to conduct a live fire test 

and evaluation on a chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear 

decontamination system for the JSF in fiscal year 2016. The Committee regards this test as critical for ensuring that the JSF will 

meet the operational requirements document and be able to conduct missions in denied, high-threat environments. The Committee 

recommends that the JPO take appropriate steps, utilizing funds 

made available in this and previous appropriations for development 

of all three JSF variants, to accelerate this testing into fiscal year 

2015 and sustain the industrial base for the development and production of such decontamination systems. 

AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK 

The Committee fully funds the Air Force request of $25,000,000 

to fund analysis of alternatives (AoA) efforts within the Airborne 

Electronic Attack program, including $5,000,000 for the Non-Kinetic Counter-Electronics (NKCE) AoA. The Committee supports 

the Air Force's decision to incorporate the results of the CounterElectronics High Power Microwave Missile Project joint capability 

technology demonstration and correlated operational utility assessment into the NKCE AoA. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Air Force to begin its NKCE AoA effort as soon as 

possible, and directs the Secretary of the Air Force to report the 

results of the NKCE AoA, as well as the Next Generation Electronic Attack AoA and Counter-Integrated Air Defense System 

AoA, to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 

days after the approval of the respective reports. 

ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 

The Committee understands that the size of the United States 

Africa Command (AFRICOM) area of responsibility, when coupled 

with the paucity of base access and supporting infrastructure, 

places a premium on long range, long endurance intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets. The Committee is aware that 

the Air Force is currently flight testing a medium altitude, long endurance unmanned aerial vehicle with flexible multi-intelligence 

sensor and communications relay capabilities. The Committee encourages the Secretary of the Air Force to adopt a plan for these 

assets that would preserve their ability to be deployed if AFRICOM 

or any other combatant command that identifies an operational 

need for such capabilities. 
254 

KC-46A 

The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to continue 

to submit quarterly reports on any KC--46A contract modifications 

with a cost greater than or equal to $5,000,000, as directed by the 

explanatory statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2012. 

BEYOND LINE OF SIGHT COMMAND AND CONTROL 

In 2011, the Air Force requested additional funds to develop the 

beyond line of sight command and control architecture in response 

to a United States Central Command requirement, and the Committee supported this request. A portion of these funds was used 

to develop Tactical Airborne Communications Pods (TACPods) for 

use on unmanned aerial vehicles. The Air Force informed the Committee that the TACPods would be used to support the bi-directional movement of full motion video across common data link radios including thousands of ROVER terminals used by ground 

forces, and that the capability would be fielded within twelve 

months of receipt of funds. The Committee is concerned that the 

Air Force has not fielded this capability as planned, but instead 

has placed TACPods into storage while pursuing a possibly redundant program to provide a similar capability. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force, in coordination with the Secretary of the Navy and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, to provide a briefing to the Committee not later than November 1, 2014 on the existing and 

planned activities in support of beyond line of sight command and 

control for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems. 

HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING 

The Department of Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) 

modernization program supports solutions to the complex challenges faced by Department acquisition programs. The HPC program has invested considerable resources to develop and deploy engineering software applications to improve outcomes for weapon 

system acquisitions. The HPC program includes the Computational 

Research for Engineering Acquisition Tools and Environments 

(CREATE) initiative, a program with the potential to substantially 

reduce costs, shorten schedules, increase design and program flexibility, and improve overall acquisition program performance by 

speeding up systems integration while identifying and correcting 

design flaws prior to production. The Committee encourages the 

Secretary of Defense to institutionalize advances made by HPC 

pilot projects within the acquisition system by establishing through 

the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center a systems engineering capability for weapon system virtual prototyping-based HPC 

applications, including CREATE software. 

HUMAN PERFORMANCE MONITORING 

The Committee recognizes and supports Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) research in human performance monitoring, which 

is a key element of human-machine interface technology. Human 

monitoring is as important as equipment monitoring as the two 
255 

must perform in tandem at optimum levels for successful mission 

completion and personnel safety. The Committee encourages the 

Director of the AFRL to continue to research nano-bio manufacturing of materials and sensor devices that are capable of detecting 

biomarkers and other substances correlating to human body conditions such as stress, fatigue, and organ damage. 

LIQUID ROCKET ENGINE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 

The Committee believes that the United States should rely on 

domestically manufactured launch vehicles as the foundation for 

access to space and is concerned about the reliance of some national security space launches on rocket engines produced in Russia. Therefore, the Committee recommendation includes 

$220,000,000 to begin risk reduction and development of a nextgeneration liquid rocket engine that is manufactured in the United 

States, meets the requirements of the national security space community, and is ready for launch not later than fiscal year 2022 

using full and open competition. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Administrator of the 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration as practicable, to 

submit a report to the congressional defense and intelligence committees not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act that 

includes a risk reduction and development plan for a next-generation liquid rocket engine program. The report must analyze national security and civil space rocket engine development requirements, examine the costs and benefits of public-private partnerships for development of the engine, and estimate costs for development, procurement, and operations and maintenance for the life of 

the program. 

SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM HIGH 

The Committee supports the Air Force decision to review the 

overhead persistent infrared mission to lower costs, increase resilience, and achieve better mission performance. The Committee understands that the Department of Defense is conducting an Analysis of Alternatives to mitigate obsolescence and ensure resilient 

options beyond the current program of record. The Committee encourages quick completion of this review to ensure adequate time 

to start operational demonstrations as appropriate and directs the 

Secretary of the Air Force to brief the findings of the review to the 

congressional defense committees immediately upon completion. 

AIR FORCE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM 

The Committee recommends $10,000,000 above the request for a 

regionally focused technology transfer innovation pilot program. 

The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering to conduct a pilot program on public-private technology transfer ventures between Department of Defense 

research and development centers and regionally focused technology incubators, with the goal of increasing the commercialization of intellectual property developed in the Department's research 

and development enterprise in support of critical cross-service technological needs such as energetics, unmanned systems, and rapid 
256 

prototyping. Technology incubator partners should be selected 

through full and open competition emphasizing strong business 

plans, demonstrated expertise in mentorship and commercialization, and strong regional partnerships. 

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM SPACE MODERNIZATION INITIATIVE 

The budget request includes $32,900,000 for the Global Positioning System (GPS) III Space Modernization Initiative (SMI) to 

address issues related to design, systems, engineering, program 

management, obsolescence, and efficiencies for GPS satellites. The 

Committee recommendation includes full funding for the GPS III 

SMI but directs the Secretary of the Air Force to allocate 

$20,000,000 to study technological maturation, including the use of 

an alternative digital GPS payload, and risk reduction consistent 

with the GPS enterprise analysis of alternatives. 

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM USER EQUIPMENT 

The Military GPS User Equipment (MGUE) program provides Meade GPS receivers with improved capability to counter emerging 

threats and interference with fositioning, navigation, and timing 

capabilities, The Department o Defense will field MGUE receivers 

across a broad range of Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps 

platforms. The Committee understands that the Department is accelerating the implementation of M-code and supports those efforts. 

The Committee recommends $156,659,000, which fully funds the 

fiscal year 2015 request for MGUE, including technology development, platform integration, and system engineering and integration 

activities. The Committee supports the Air Force strategy of implementing a proactive, collaborative MGUE platform integration activity to mitigate risk, and encourages the Service Secretaries to 

procure MGUE receivers in fi1;s~ca~l!.y~e~a~r~2::;0~1~6~. ------------\ 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, 

DEFENSE-WIDE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ...... ................ $17,086,412,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .... 16,766,084,000 

Committee recommendation .... , ... ,......................... .................. 17,077,900,000 

Change from budget request . ........................................ +311,816,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $17,077,900,000 

for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide. 

The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 
EJECTION SEAT SAFETYISUSTAINABIL!TY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 

The Committee is concemed by Air Force data that indicate safety concerns 

with legacy ejection seat technology for aircrews using helmet mounted displays. 

The Committee recommendation includes $6,000,000 for improvements or 

replacement of legacy aircraft ejection seats that address documented safety 

concerns and requirements. In implementing this program, the Secretary of the Air 

Force should consider all technology used or approved in current Department of 

Defense programs to ensure that these ejection seat improvements or replacements 

are achieved through a full and open acquisition process. 
COST SHARING OF FORWARD-DEPLOYED NUCLEAR WEAPONS 

The United States currently provides the vast majority of the funding 

necessary to sustain forward-deployed nuclear weapons in Europe. In light of the 

growing costs of this mission, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to 

submit a rep011 to the congressional defense committees outlining the proportional 

contributions ofNATO members to the cost of sustaining forward-deployed 

nuclear weapons. This report should include the effects of NATO proportional 

cost-sharing on the Department's five year costs of maintaining forward-deployed 

nuclear weapons and shall be submitted not later than 180 days after the enactment 

of this Act. 
257 

(DOLLARS lN Tt<OUSAN!IS) 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPHENT, TEST & E\'AL, DEF"ENSE-WIOE 

BASIC RESEARCH DTRA UNIVERSITY $TR.o.TEGlC PARTNERSHIP BASIC RESEARCH. 

DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 

BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES. 

BASIC OPERATIONAL IIEOICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE. 

"'ATIOMAL OEH.NSE EPUCATTO"' PROOAAII 

tHSTORICALLY BLAC~ COlLEGES & UNIV (HIICU]. 

CHEIIJCAL AND BIOLOGIGJ\L DEFENSE PROGRM 

TDTAL, BASIC RESEARCH 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

JOINT HUNITIDNS TECHNOLOGY. 

9 IH011EDICAL TECHNOLOGY 

11 LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAJII 

12 APPLIED RESEARCH FOR ADVANCEMENT S&T PRIORIHES. 

13 lNFORHATlON foND COHI1UNICATIONS. TECHNOLOGY. 

15 BIOLCIGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE 

16 CHEIIICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAI\,. 

18 CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH. 

20 TACTICAL HCHNOLOGY. 

21 11AHRl,I.LS ,~oN() BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY. 

2:2 ELECTIWN !CS TECHNOLOGY. 

23 WEAPONS OF HASS DESTRUCT10tl DEFEAT TfCHHOlOGrES. 

24 SOFn.IARE fNCHIEERINll !NSTITLITE. 

25 SPECl,l.l OPERATIONS TECHNOlOG"¥ DEVELOPHENT. 

TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH. 

BUDGET CO""TTTEE CHANGE FROH 

REOUEST REC0!1HENOED REQUEST 

" "' H,776 

"' "' 312, "' 44' 564 " '" ·10,000 

49 '848 49.848 

(5' 468 155.488 .. ,0,000 

24,412 34,412 +10,000 

48, 2EII 48,261 

562,49~ 572.497 +10,000 

20.065 20,065 

"' "' 114.790 +2. 548 

" '815 41.815 -4,000 

" . 965 41 ,965 

'" "' 334.407 

.. '" 44,625 

22S.317 226,317 

15.000 15,000 

305.464 305,464 

160,369 11~0. 389 

179,203 179,203 

151. "' 151,737 

,, "' 9.156 

" "" 34,750 ·5,000 

1 ,692 "' 1,665.963 ·1L452 
258 

(OOLLARS TN THOUSANDS) 

BUDGET C011M ITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOMI'IE~OEO REQUEST 

···------------ -------······- ················-··-----

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY OEVELOPHENT 

26 J01NT 1'1\INITIONS ADVANCED TECH INSENSITIVE l'IUNtTIONS AD. 26 '688 '26.688 

27 SOl L IC ADVANCED OEVELGP~ENT, 8,862 8,682 

" CO.~BATINO TERRORI$11 TECHI«!LOGV SUPPGRT. 69,675 79,67,5 +10,000 

" fOREIGN COHP,I,RATIVE TESTING .. 30' 000 24' 000 -6,000 

" COUNTERPROL!FER!I.TION !NlT!ATIVES- PROLIF PREV '- DEf<EAT. 283 '694 291 ,694 +8,000 

" ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORHANCE ASSESSHENT 8,HI) 8,470 

" D{SCR!l'HNATION SE~SDR TECHNOLOGY. " no ~3.110 -2,000 

" WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY " 068 34,066 •20 ,000 

" AOVAKC£0 C41SR. 15,329 13.264 -2,045 

" ADVANCED RESEARCH 16.~64 16,584 

" JOlt!T OOO·OOE I'IUHITlOt/S TECHNOLOGY OEVELOP'IENT 19,335 19,J3!i 

38 AGILE TRAHSPO FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21) THEATER CA. 2, 544 2.:544 

" SPEClA.l PROGAA/t • ·110A TECHNOLOGY 51 ,033 40.433 • \0.600 

" ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTeMS .. 12~,723 129,723 

., SPACE PROGRAI'IS AHO TECHI'IOLOGY 179.863 179,663 

" ANAL \'TIC ASSESSMENTS. 12.000 12,000 

" ADVANCED INMOVATl't'E ANAL 'ISIS AND CONCEPTS. 80' 000 50,000 ·10.000 

" COt\ !'ION Kl Ll VEHICLE TECHNOLOG\'. 25.639 22,639 ·3 ,000 

" CHEMICAL AHO BIOLOGICAL OE!'·"EHSE PROGAA.'I • AOVANCEP DEV. 132,674 13~,674 

" JOI ~T ELECTRONIC AOVNjCEP TECHNOLOO\'. " '" 10,965 

" JOINT CAPABILIT\' TECHNOLOGI' OE~NSTRATIONS. '" . 960 '" '" • \0,000 

" OEFEHSE·WrDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOG\' PROG. 91 ,095 " ,095 

" EI1ERliiHG CAPA\IILITIES TECHNOLOGY OEVELOP11ENT 33, 71)1'1 3:'1, roe 

" GENERIC LOGISTICS R&O TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS .. 16,936 16,636 

" DEPLDYI'IENT AMO Ol 5TRl8UTlOH ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY .. 29,08-3 29,603 

" SHlATHllC ENVIRON~EI<TAL RF.SEARCH PROGRAM 57.796 51' 796 

" MICROELECTRONIC HCHNDlDGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT. 72,144 62,700 +10,556 

" JOINT \o/1\RFIGHTJNG PROGRAM. 7,405 5,40S -2.000 

" ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES 92 '246 92' 246 

" COMMNO, CONTROL AND CO~MUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 243.265 243. 265 

60XJ\ DEFENSE RAPID [NNOVATIDN PRilGRAM. 250. Ql)l) ..250,000 

" NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE 1ECNNOLOGY. 306.920 386.926 

" SENSOR TECH~OLOCY 312,821 312.821 
259 

(DOLLARS IN TllOtJSANDS) 

64 DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECM~LOGY OEVELOP~E~T 

65 SOFTWARE ENGINEUHNG INSTITUTE. 

66 QUICK REACTION SPECIA.L PROJECTS 

68 MODELING AND SlMULATtON MANAGEMENT OFFICE, 

71 TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOG'/. 

72 OPERATIONAL ENERG'i CAPABILlTY IMPROVEMENT. 

73 CWI'IO SYSTEI'tS,. 

74 SPECIAL OPERATIO!IS AiNANCEO TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .. 

TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. 

DEI'IONSTRATION & VALIDATION 

T7 NUt:LlAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIFtiENT. 

7g IOALKOFF 

BO ADVANCE SEKSOR APPLICATIONS PROGRAM. 

61 EMVJRON.IIE~TAL SECURITY TECHIIICAL CERTIF!C.O.TtON PROGRAM. 

82 BALLISTlC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT 

63 8ALLtST1C MISSILE DEFENSE MJOCOURSE OE>E'-ISE SEGMENT, 

64 CHEMICAL 1\NO BIOLOGICAL OEFENS£ PROGRAM 

6!> BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS 

86 BALLISHC MISSILE DEFENSE ENABUNG PROGIWIS. 

87 SPECIAL PROORAMS - ~CA. 

88 AEGIS 6~. 

89 SPACE SL!RVEILL.ANCE & TRACKING SYSTEM. 

90 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PI'«<GIWIS. 

91 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE C2811C. 

9~ BALLISTIC IIISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WAAFJGHTER SL!PPORT. 

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE INTERGRATION ANti OPERATIONS 

93 CENTER (MDIOC). 

94 REGARDING TRENCH. 

95 SEA SASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) .. 

96 ISRAELI COOPERATlVE PROGRAtiS., 

97 BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST .. 

98 6ALLISHC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS. 

99 i"IUIIANtTARJAN OEIIINING. 

100 COALtT!ON WARFARE. 

BL!DGET COIIIIITTEE CIWtGE FROII 

REQUEST RECOIIIIENOEO REQUEST 

10,692 

15,776 

89,319 

3,000 

91 '148 

31.800 

46 '066 

57.622 

2.933,402 

41 .012 

90, sse 

1~.518 

51 ,462 

299 598 

1 003,768 

179 236 

Jn .893 

410,863 

310,261 

929,208 

31 .348 

6,389 

443. 484 

46' 387 

58,530 

\6,199 

64,409 

96,803 

386,482 

485.294 

10,194 

10,139 

10,6&2 

15.776 

64,319 

3,000 

81 '148 

31 ,800 

48,066 

49,822 

173.313 

41,072 

90,558 

15,518 

51 .482 

292' 798 

1 047,188 

119' 236 

392.893 

398.249 

295' 261 

880,708 

31 .346 

6,389 

431,484 

46,387 

58.530 

16,1911 

84 '409 

288' 842 

350,582. 

446,794 

10,194 

10, 139 

-5,000 

-8,000 

+nH,911 

·1!.800 

1'43,400 

-12.614 

-1~.000 

.,2,000 

+172' 039 

·35,900 

·38 500 
260 

(DOLLARS IN THQUSAJoiOS) 

101 OEPARTt!ENT OF OEFfN$£ CORROSION PROGRAM. 

102 ADVANCED INI«lVIITIVE TECHNOLOOIES. 

103 DOD UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON OEVELQPMENT. 

104 WIDE AREA SIHI.VEI Lloi.NCE .. 

107 JOINT SYSTEMS HiTEBRATION. 

108 JOIHT FIRES INTEGRATION i Jfo!TEROPERABIL!TY TEAH. 

109 LAND-BASED 511-l (LS$1'13). 

110 AEGIS SM-3 BLOCK !!A. CO-DEVELOPMENT. 

113 SUPPORT TO NET\IORKS AND INFORMATlOK INTEGRATION. 

114 JOINT ELECTROHAGNETtC TECHNOLOGY (JET) Pli:OGRAt! 

115 CVBER SECURITY INITIATIVE. 

116 NUCLEAR At/0 CONVENTIONAL PliYSICAL SECURITY EQUJPIIENT 

117 PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPIIENT. 

TOTAL. DEMONSTRATION $ VALIDATION 

ENGINEERING & MAJoiUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 

118 CHEH!CA.l AND 6l0LOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRM. 

119 ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFnCE (AITS-JPO). 

120 JOINT TACTICAL JNFORKATIOII OJSTRIBUTIO~ SVSTEK (JTUlS}. 

121 WEAPONS OF 1'\ASS DESTRUCTION CEFfAT CAPA81LITIES 

122 1 IIFORIIATION TECHNOLOGY CEVI'.l0PHENT. 

1n HCI'IELANO PERSONNEL SECURITY HIITIAHVE. 

124 DEFENSE E~PORTABILITV PRDGRAII 

125 OUSD(C} IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES. 

126 DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEI'\S DE\IHOPI'IENT -'MD OEIIDNSTRATION. 

127 DCI'IO POLICY AND INTEGRAHON. 

128 DEFENSE AGE~Y INJTIATl\IES FINANCIAL SYSTEI'I. 

129 DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEII (ORAS). 

130 DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREIIENT CAPABILJTY. 

131 GLOBAL COIIBAT SUPPORT SVSTEII. 

132 DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORII.'.TJON HANAGEI'IENT (EElH) 

TOTAL, ENGINEER INO & HANUFACTURlNG DEVELOPMENT. 

BUDGET COI'IMllTEE CKANGE FROM 

REQUEST RECOf'IMENDED I!EQUEST 

2.907 

190.000 

3, Hl2 

53,000 

1,002 

7 '102 

123,444 

263,M5 

12.500 

2.656 

'" 7.936 

70. 762 

125' 160 

345' 8113 

25.459 

11.562 

6,887 

12,530 

"' 

"' 

15.326 

19.351 

41.465 

10,135 

14,241 

3,680 

532.075 

2.907 

110, oao 

3,102 

53.0(}0 

7,002 

7.102 

123,444 

263,695 

12,500 

2,656 

'" 7. 936 

90' 762 

6,171,885 

345, BB3 

25,459 

17,562 

6,867 

12,530 

"' 3,244 

6.500 

15,326 

111,351 

41 465 

10 135 

9.H6 

14,241 

3,660 

532,075 

+20,000 
261 

(DOLLARS Ul THOUSANDS) 

ROT&E IIANACEMENT SUPPORT 

133 DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (OARS) .. 

134 JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT. 

135 CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION IHVESTIIENT DEVELOPMENT. 

136 ASSES~ENTS AND EVAUJAT!ON$, 

136 JOINT MISSION EN\IIRONHEHT TEST CAPABILITY (JI'tETC). 

139 TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPOfn AND ANALYSIS .. 

\42 JOINT THEATER AIR 1\NO MISSILE DEFENSE ORGAIHZATIOH. 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAM USO(P). 

145 SYSTEI'IS ENGINEERING. 

146 STUDIES AND A~LYSIS SUPf'DRT. 

147 NUCLEAR 1'\ATTERS PHYSICAL SECURJTY, 

146 SUPPORT TQ NETWORK$ AND TNFORHATJOII JNTEGRATJON .. 

149 QENERAL SUPPORT TO USO (INTELLlGEHCE). 

150 CHEl't!CAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAII 

156 SHALL BUSINESS lr.I~OVATJON RESEARCH. 

159 Sl'tALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH/TECHNr!LOGY TRANSFER 

160 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS. 

161 DEFENSE TECH~ I CAL !NF01l:1'1ATTON CENTER (OTIC). 

162 R&D !N SUPPORT OF DOll E"'LISTIIENT. TESTI"'G & EVALUATIO"'. 

163 DEVflOPIIE~ TEST AND EVALUATION 

164 MNAGEIIENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH $ OEVELQPHENT) .. 

165 BUOGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSIIENTS. 

166 OPERATIONS SECURIT'!' (OPSEC) 

181 JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT. 

170 SUPPORT TO INFORI"IATlON OPERATfQr.tS (10) CAPABILITIES. 

112 CYB£R INTELLIGENCE. 

174 COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT ANO HAINING TRANSFORIIATJON. 

175 IIANAGEI'IENT HEADO\.IARTERS MDA. 

176 IIANAGEIIHIT HEADQUARTERS • WHS 

CLASS !Fl EO PROGRAMS 

TOTAL. ROT&E MA"'ACEMEIIT SUPPORT 

BUDGET COIIIIITTEE CKANGE FROH 

REQUEST RECOHIIEr.tOED REQUEST 

5,616 

~.092 

254 '503 

21 ,661 

27.162 

24.501 

43 176 

44,246 

2.665 

~' 366 

27 901 

'" 105.944 

'" 1. 634 

12,105 

50' 369 

6,452 

15, 167 

71 '362 

4, 100 

1 ,956 

10 321 

11 552 

6.746 

44.01)5 

36' 996 

'" 44.367 

667.676 

5,516 

3. 092 

159, 01)3 

21 661 

27 162 

24,501 

43.176 

100.000 

44,746 

2.665 

4,366 

27,901 

2,855 

11)5,944 

'" 

1 .634 

12,105 

50.369 

8.452 

111,187 

71 ,362 

4, ti)O 

1 .956 

10,321 

11 .552 

6, 746 

39 'oos 

44 367 

854.878 

-95,51)0 

+100,1)1)0 

''" 

+4,000 

·5.000 

·36.996 

·32.996 
262 

(OOLLI\fi:S lN TIIQUSANDS) 

OJ>EAATIONAL SYSTEIIS DE"ELO>'MENT 

176 ENTERPRISE SECURITY SVSTEII (ESS). 

1?9 REGHIIIAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACll 8 PARTNERSIIIP FOR PEoi.C 

180 OVERSEAS tiiJIIAN!TAR[AN A$$1STANCE SHARED ]NFORIIATION SV. 

\Sl INOUSTRli\L !lASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINHENT SUPPORT 

182 OPERATI!IHAL SYSTEMS OEVELOPHENT. 

183 GLOBAL THEATER SEC\JIUTV COOPERATION HANAGEIIENT. 

184 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEIIS D. 

185 JOINT HITfGRATTGN AND INTEROPERABJL!TY. 

166 PLANNING AND DECISION AID SVSTEI'I. 

187 C41 lNTEROPERABILlTY. 

169 JOINTiALLlEO COALITION INFORHATIQN SHARING. 

193 NATIONAL NlllTARV COPIIIANO SYSTEII-WIOE SUPPORT. .. 

194 DEFEIISE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGUIEERlNG & tfiiTECRATION. 

195 LONG HAUL COIIt\UNlC ... TIONS ([!CS). 

196 lllMIIIUH ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMIIUNlCArlCitiS t!EOORK. 

197 PUBLIC KEI' ltiFRASTRUCTURE (PKl) 

198 KEY MANAGEMENT HIFRASTRUCTURE (KMl) . 

199 JNFORHATlON SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAtl. 

200 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURIT'I' PROGRAM 

202 GLOB~L COHIIANO ANO CONTROL SYSTEII. 

203 JOINT SPECTRUII CENTER. 

204 NET·CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (t!CES). 

205 JOINT 1IUTARY OECEPTIO~ l~ITlAHVE. 

206 TELEPORT PROGRAM. 

208 SPECIAL APPLiCATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES. 

212 CVBER SECURITY INITIATIVE. 

21 3 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP J .. 

217 POLICY R&O PROGRI\I'IS. 

BUDGET CI»>IIITTEE CHANGE FROM 

REQuEST R€C(»>IIENOED RECUEST 

3.986 

1, 75C 

"' 14 778 

2,953 

10.350 

28.~96 

11 .968 

1 ,842 

63 '558 

931 

'" 9 '657 

2S. 365 

12,671 

32,698 

11 '304 

12~ 854 

33 793 

13 423 

J.n~ 

'" 

2.697 

19,294 

3,234 

6,646 

7,065 

3,988 

1, 75C 

"' 

14,178 

2. 953 

10.350 

28,496 

11 ,968 

1 ,842 

63,5M 

3,931 

'" 

9,657 

25.355 

12,671 

"' 

32,698 

,, ,304 

145,65~ 

33' 793 

13,423 

3, 774 

'" 

2,697 

15,794 

3,23~ 

8.8~6 

7.065 

+20,000 

·3,500 
263 

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

218 NET CENTRICITY 

221 DISTRIBUTED COI1~DN GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 

224 DlSTfi.JBUTEO COH~ON GROVNOISURFACE SYSTEMS 

229 INSIDER THREAT. 

230 HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAH. 

239 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS.,. 

240 LOGJST:CS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES. 

241 t\AIIAGEI1ENT HEADQUARTERS (JCS) 

243 RO· 11 UI.V 

245 SPECIAL OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEll, 

247 SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SVSTEIIS DEVELOPMENT. 

248 SOF OPERAT!ONAL ENHANCEMENlS 

252 WARRIOR SYSTEMS. 

253 SPECIAL PROGRA~. 

259 SOF TACTICAL Vf:HlCLES. 

262 SOF IIARITIHE SYSTEMS. 

26~ SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILL"HCE ACTlVJT1ES. 

26S SOF OPERATIONAL ENMMICEH[NT$ INTELLIGENCE. 

TOTAL, DPERATIONAL SYSTEtiS OEYELOPI"'ENT. 

999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS. 

DARPA UNDISTRU!UTEO REDUCTION .. 

TOTAL. RESEARCH. OEVEtOP~ENT, TEST & EVAL, OEF·WlOE 

BUOGH COI'IIIlTTEE CHANGE FROI'I 

REQUEST RECOIII'IENOED REQUEST 

~~. 964 23,984 

5, 286 5, 266 

J' 400 J, 400 

8,870 8.67Q 

2,110 2, 110 

22' 366 22.,366 

1 ,574 , ,574 

~' 409 4,409 

9. 702 1 ,314 -8,388 

259 -259 

'" "' 154.821 -9,412 

9.490 9,490 

75.253 70,069 

24,661 20,573 -~ ,066 

20' 906 20,906 

3,672 3,672 

57' 905 55,046 -2.859 

"' 3, 788 

" "' 15,225 -1 ,000 

913,557 8118.887 ·14,870 

3,118,502 3,257,402 +138,900 

-69,000 ·69,000 

16,766,084 17,077,900 ~31 1 ,818 
264 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thouund& of doll11nl'] 

Budge! Committe& cn.ngefrom ,_, Request R~K:ommended R1quut 

3 BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES ...... 34,56<1 -tc,ooo 

Program decrttU& -10.000 

NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM 4M38 Sl!,488 10,000 

Program inerana 10,000 

HISTORICALLY SLACK COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES 

{HBCUJ 2oi,412 34,412 10,000 

Program inCI'll~se 10,000 

810ME01CAL TfCHNOLOGY 112,242 114,790 

Pr1J9ram increno 2.548 '·"' 

" LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM !51,815 47,975 -4,000 

Program decreaaa -4.000 

" SOF TECHNOLOOV DEVELOPMENT 39,750 34,7110 ~.000 

SOF technoiO{Iy development. e~ceu growlh -5.000 

" COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 69,875 7U15 10,000 

Program mcreasa 10,000 

" FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING JO,DOO 24,000 -6,000 Program decrease -6,000 

COUNTERPROUFERATION INITIATIVES-

" PROLIFERATION PREVENTION & DEFEAT 283,6~ 291,694 8,000 

Program increase 6.000 

33 DISCRIMINATION SENSOR TECHNOLOGY 45,1t0 43,110 ·2.000 

UlljYSiifittd grQ\Yih -2,000 

" WEAPONS TECHNOlOGY 1,,088 34,068 20,000 Program increase· inlerceplor tll(:hnology 20,000 

" AOVANCEO C41SR 1!1,329 13,284 -2,045 Unjvstiliad growth -2.045 

" SPECIAL PROGRAM· MDA TECHNOLOGY 51,033 40,433 -10,$00 

un;us11~ad growth -to.eoo 

" ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS 80,000 00,<>00 ·10,000 

Program decreaSE! -10.000 

.. COMMON I<IL.\.. VEHIC\..E TECHNOLOGY 25,639 22,!139 ·3.000 

Program operati011s. unjustified reques1 ·3.000 

" JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 131,960 121,960 ·10,000 

Program deerease -10,000 

" MICROELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 12,1« 82,700 10,15!16 

Program increase 10,556 

" JOINT WARFIQHTING PROGRAM 7,<05 !.'0!1 ·2,000 

Program decrease -2.000 
265 

B~ctget Committee Cl\ilnge rrom ._, Requnt Reeornm..,ded ~q"""t 

60XX DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION FU'-10 250,000 2$0,000 

Pr0<4ram •flcrti&Se 250,000 

.. QUiCK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS 69,319 64,319 ~-""' Program decrease -5,000 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TE;CHNOLOGY 

,. DEVELOPMENT S7,82Z 49,822 -8,000 

Engil'leerong analysis· unjustified grow!h -8.000 

BALLISTiC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE 

" SEGMENT 299,.5'8 292,798 -6,800 

THAAD development progr~m support- unjustified growth ~.600 

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIOCO\JRSE DEFENSE 

" SEGMENT 1.003.788 1.~7.188 .f3, .. (}0 Program m11nagement · un,usUf<ed groW!~ -6,800 

Program mcrease .. CE-11 upgrades 43.000 

Program ill(;re11ee- stocl;pile reliBll~ily program •.ooo Program oncrease- commend launch equipment Md frre 

control u.o9radu 3.000 

.. BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ENABLING PROGRAM& 410,163 398,249 ·12,&14 

Syetem engineeri!'lgand int&gra~!ln . UlliU&Iitied growth -3,914 

Enabling test- transfer not llroP&rty acoounted -3,700 

lnteKigence end security- 1Jf'I/U$Ii~ed growth -3,100 

BMO Information man~gement ~ystam~ • un)u&hf•ed ,,_ -1,900 

" SPECIAL PFtOGRA.MS • MOA 310,261 295.261 ·15,000 

UnJustified growth -15,000 

" AEGIS BMD 929,21)& 88(1,708 -48,!00 

~is BMD 51 dflveiopmeni. !;0,91 growth -37.M 

Aegis testing re8ltuc1u~- excess to n~qulremenl -7,800 

S~&tem englneanng and lnt&gratlon • un)uilllled growth -3,700 

" BA.LLIST1C MISSILE OfFENSE C2BMC 443,48-4 431,484 -12,000 

Splrel 8.2·3- \Kljual111ed growl~ without baeelina -12,000 

" ISRAEU COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS 96,803 268,842 172,039 

Israeli Upper tier 20.3${1 

Israeli Arrow progl"'lm ~5.500 

Short rangE~ b<illistic rrUssHe delenst.~ 106,200 

" BMDT .. tll 386,482 350,582 -35.800 Flight test delays -35.900 

" BMO Targett 485,2')4 446,794 -38,500 

MR6M Type 3 test herdW8re -lack or juatmeation end 

scheclute delay a -26.500 

MRBM Type 112 test hardware· early to need -10,000 

"' ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 190.000 170,000 -20,0()(1 

Progrem decrease -20,000 
266 

Budget Committee Chang11 from 

R-1 Requut R&eommended ........ 117 PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT 70,782 to,7U 20,000 

Additional l&$1 for AHW 20,0:0 

13~ CE""RAL TEST & EVAL INVESTMENT DEVELoPMENT 264,&(13 159,003 ""'"" Program dacrene -15,000 

Electronrc warfare last ca~billty lran~fer to OTE IIOQ 3 -so,roo 

'"' CLASSIFIED PROGRAM USO{P) 100,000 100,000 

Claa~if•e<l ad)uSlment 100.000 

"' SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 44,246 44,746 

Program increase 500 "' 

'" OEYELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION 15,187 19,187 4,000 

Program in<:r1'1B5e <.000 

COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING 

'" TRAIIISFORMATION 44,005 39,005 -5.000 

Program dec~$e -5.000 

m MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS -MOA 36,H8 • -36,998 

Transfer to OM,OW -36.998 

, .. INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 125,8$4 1~,864 20,000 

Proglllm increase 20.000 

'" SPECIAL APf'LICATlONS FOR CONTINGENCIES 19,2'94 15,Tt4 ., .. Unjustified growth -3,500 

'" MQ-9UAV ,,702 1.314 .a.388 

Underexeeution ~.3!8 

U3 RQ.11 UAV "' • -259 

U<ljU5lifoed OIIW start _,., 

SPECIAL. OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS 

24!5 ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 164,233 164,8'21 .(1,412 

CommandO Sokl . new sl11rt -2,912 

Mi5aoon Tr<~lnong and Prep S~atems- unjustified growth -2.500 

C-130 TF r.edflr- undtrex.eulion ·4,000 

'" SOF OPERAnONAL. ENHANCEMENTS 7!5,263 70,089 -5,164 

Ctassif<11d adjustmoot ·5,164 

252 WARRIOR SYSTEMS 24.861 20,~73 -4,088 

Long Range MISO- e:reeas growth ~ .... 262 SOF MARITIME SYSTEMS 57,90~ 55,0<&6 ·2,859 

Ne)(l GeneraHon SurfiiCE! System- e!(C(I&l grOW1h -2,8!59 

'" $OF OPERATIONAL. E;NHANCEMENTS 1/tiTEL.UGENCE 16,22!5 15,225 -1,000 

Classified adjustment -1JMJO 

CLASSIFIE;D PROGRAMS 3,118,502 3,257,402 138,900 Cia5lllfied adjustment 138.900 

DARPA UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION -i9,000 

DARPA undistributed reduc1io~ -ti9,000 
267 

HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES AND MINORITY 

INSTITUTIONS 

The Committee includes additional funding for the Historically 

Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions program 

(HBCUIMI). The HBCUIMI program provides access to scientific 

and technical information products and services to faculty, staff, 

and students of Historically Black Colleges and Universities, American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities, Native 

American-Serving Nontribal Institutions, and other minority serving institutions. 

ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 

The Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) was created to identify, 

analyze, and accelerate capabilities to counter strategic adversaries 

and improve the posture for engaging future threats. As part of its 

mission, the SCO examines alternative strategies, explores multidomain solutions, builds partnerships across national security divides, analyzes cost effectiveness, risk and performance, develops 

prototypes to accelerate capabilities, and increases the operational 

options available to senior leadership. The Committee is aware 

that one of the capabilities the SCO is exploring is the early fielding of a smaller tactical electromagnetic railgun system for both 

land-based and ship-based railgun systems, and encourages this 

advancement. 

Additionally, a reduction to the Advanced Innovative Technologies demonstration and validation program element should be 

taken from programs other than ship-based guns and land-based 

guns for base defense. 

DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY 

Within its Biomedical Technology line, the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is encouraged 

to make resources available for the development of restorative 

products and technologies which may serve as an alternative to 

amputation. 

Additionally, the Committee supports the leadership initiatives 

at DARPA to better manage the execution of funds. DARPA's efficiency, financial execution, and ability to obligate funds have greatly improved. Therefore, as DARPA's efficiencies continue to improve, a non-prejudicial reduction of $69,000,000 will be determined, by program, at the discretion of the Director of DARPA. 

LASER-DRIVEN X· RAY TECHNOLOGY 

The Committee continues to place a high priority on research to 

address the threats of nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism. 

Therefore, the Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to 

maintain the fiscal year 2014 funding level in fiscal year 2015 to 

conduct research to speed development of laser-driven x-ray technologies that will bring this technology closer to the ultimate goal 

of a field demonstration of stand-off detection of shielded nuclear 

materials and other weapons of mass destruction. 
268 

MODELING AND SIMULATION 

The Committee recognizes the important contributions of the 

modeling and simulation industry in many sectors of the American 

economy, and in particular its applications in training warfighters. 

Modeling and simulation is effective in providing platforms to prepare warfighters and small unit leaders for rapid decision making 

in asymmetric and irregular combat. The Committee recognizes 

that modeling and simulation will continue to serve as a valuable 

and cost effective training method for every warfare specialty and 

maintenance area. The Committee believes that the Department of 

Defense should further harness the entrepreneurial and innovative 

spirit of industry, academia, and the government to facilitate the 

progress in state-of-the-art training by making greater use of modeling and simulation. The Committee encourages persistent and 

augmented use of modeling and simulation technology in scenariobased training, aggressive simulation technology research and development efforts, and active endeavors to substitute simulation for 

more expensive forms of training. 

CYBERSECURITY 

The Committee recognizes the importance of sustaining a robust 

cybersecurity research program within the Department of Defense, 

particularly as it relates to the interdisciplinary nature of cyber 

systems and the role of human behavior. The interdisciplinary cybersecurity research model can contribute to the development of 

novel approaches for risk assessment, which incorporate components of risk beyond computer science such as understanding risk· 

related fundamental properties of dynamic cyber threats; developing recognition capabilities for new cyber threats; and increasing 

resilience against attacks. Accordingly, the Committee encourages 

the Secretary of Defense to leverage information assurance and 

cyber defense research done through defense agencies, including 

the National Security Agency, as the Department plans and conducts interdisciplinary research to identify and close cybersecurity 

gaps. 

HUMAN AND ROBOT COLLABORATION 

The Committee recognizes the need to enhance manufacturing by 

flexibly assigning work to the human or machine most capable of 

performing a given task, and thereby reducing the need to invest 

in fixed heavy manufacturing equipment. Accordingly, the Committee urges the Secretary of Defense to increase resources available for the defense-wide manufacturing science and technology 

program to support formation of industry-university partnerships 

on a competitive basis to develop technologies and processes that 

utilize human and robot collaboration for large scale manufacturing. 

MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 

The Committee is pleased that in both the fiscal year 2014 and 

2015 budget requests the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) has refocused its efforts from far-term, conceptual programs to near-term 

programs that are necessary to defend the United States and its 
269 

allies from missile threats. The Committee believes that the discrimination of threats is paramount to improving the threat assessment and reliability of the ballistic missile defense system and supports programs designed to improve the discrimination capability of 

the ballistic missile defense system. 

The Committee supports the budget request for the development 

of the Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR); however, the 

Committee is concerned by the lack of details provided in the budget request submission. Therefore, the Committee directs the Director of the MDA to provide a report to the congressional defense 

committees not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act 

detailing the strategy for developing and procuring the LRDR. The 

report shall include the program's objectives and key parameters, 

a detailed schedule through full operational capability, and a cost 

estimate by fiscal year. 

The Committee also supports the budget request of $99,500,000 

for the re-designed exo-atmospheric kill vehicle (EKV) for the 

ground-based interceptor as part of the ground-based midcourse defense program. However, the budget request submission lacks details necessary for continued oversight of the program. Therefore, 

the Committee directs the Director of the MDA to provide a report 

to the congressional defense committees not later than 90 days 

after the enactment of this Act detailing the strategy for developing, procuring, and fielding the re-designed EKV. The report 

shall include the program's objectives and key parameters, a detailed schedule, and a cost estimate by fiscal year. The report shall 

also include any necessary legislative provisions that the Director 

of the MDA may require to fully implement the acquisition strategy 

for the EKV. 

MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY-IRON DOME 

The Committee recommends $350,972,000 for the Iron Dome 

short-range rocket defense system, an increase of $175,000,000 

above the budget request. 

Since fiscal year 2011, the Committee has supported the government of Israel by providing more than $720,000,000 for the Iron 

Dome system. With the fiscal year 2015 recommendation, that total 

will increase to more than $1,070,000,000. 

The Committee understands that there is a signed agreement between the Israeli and United States governments concerning the 

procurement of the Iron Dome system and the necessity for producing various components of the system in the United States. The 

Committee is also aware that the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) 

and the Israeli Missile Defense Organization (IMDO) formerly 

agreed to the United States providing $680 million between fiscal 

years 2012 and 2015 for the Iron Dome program. The Committee 

is concerned that the agreement does not cover the full amount 

that is recommended for fiscal year 2015. Given the significant 

American investment in this system, the Committee believes that 

co-production of parts and components should be accomplished in 

a way that will maximize American industry participation in interceptor and battery deliveries for Israel's defense needs. 

Therefore, the Committee directs that the Director of the MDA 

may not obligate or expend $175,000,000 of the amount rec-
270 

ommended in fiscal year 2015 until the Government of Israel submits a sufficiently detailed cost and schedule justification to the Director of the MDA and the Director approves it. The detailed cost 

and schedule justification must include a detailed timeline for obligation and expenditure of program funds received above the budget 

request for each fiscal year for which funds were appropriated; copies of signed and ratified contracts, sub-contracts, and teaming arrangements between Israeli and American industry for all Iron 

Dome co-production efforts; delivery to MDA of all technical data 

packages as accepted by American industry suppliers for co-production; and a common cost model of Iron Dome components, to be 

jointly developed and agreed upon by MDA and IMDO that includes recurring and non-recurring engineering costs, estimates for 

future buys, and actual costs beginning with fiscal year 2013, the 

required quantities for all components through fiscal year 2019, 

and component lead-times and delivery schedules. 

Additionally, the Committee expects that the Director of the 

MDA will ensure that Iron Dome operational data has been provided per previous commitments; that this additional funding be 

applied to the work share percentage for fiscal year 2015 funding 

between American and Israeli industry as proscribed under the recently signed Iron Dome procurement agreement; and, that the additional funds are required to meet Israeli defense needs. Any 

funds found to be in excess of Israel's justified and documented 

needs during fiscal year 2015 may be transferred to appropriations 

available for the procurement of weapons and equipment according 

to priority needs. 

The Committee also believes that if there is a request for Iron 

Dome funding for fiscal year 2016, the Director of the MDA must 

establish for the Committee how those funds will resolve details 

and agreements needed for American-based co-production of all-up 

rounds and cover the export of Iron Dome technology to American 

and Israeli allies, including co-production of parts, components, and 

all-up rounds of those exports. 

The Committee directs the Director of the MDA, in coordination 

with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics, to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than October 1, 2014, on the information provided 

in the required detailed cost and schedule justification, including 

the views of the Director and the Under Secretary on its sufficiency. 

MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY-COOPERATION WITH UNIVERSITIES 

The Committee commends the Director of the Missile Defense 

Agency (MDA) for working with universities to best leverage innovative breakthrough research and technologies for next generation 

ballistic missile defense capabilities. The Committee encourages 

the Director of the MDA to continue cooperating with universities 

and to establish a university affiliated research center. Such a center would consolidate core research and development capabilities in 

areas such as advanced interceptor propulsion systems and high fi. 

delity modeling and simulation and would potentially enhance the 

ability of the MDA to improve the ground-based midcourse defense 
271 

program, augment command and control systems, and increase 

overall mission assurance. 

DISABLING AND NEUTRALIZING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION 

The budget request includes $283,694,000 for Counterproliferation Initiatives-Proliferation Prevention and Defeat. The Committee recommendation provides $291,694,000, an increase of 

$8,000,000 above the budget request, to support the demonstration 

of technology solutions applicable to the Army and related Department of Defense organizations in addressing operations in subterranean environments. The Committee notes that the increased 

program funding will support a dedicated effort to mature prototypes and demonstrate capabilities in support of the Army to disable and neutralize weapons of mass destruction. 

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING 

The Committee is aware that additive manufacturing techniques 

and capabilities have the potential to lower the cost of maintaining 

aging weapon platforms. Currently, the Department of Defense 

uses additive manufacturing for design iteration, prototyping, tooling and fixtures, and for some noncritical parts. However, the Department eventually wants to use additive manufacturing to build 

aerospace parts. The Committee believes that the Department of 

Defense can utilize additive manufacturing improvements to save 

money in upfront manufacturing costs, improve fleet readiness by 

creating on-demand alternatives to the current parts supply chain, 

reduce parts certification and transition costs, and reduce costs 

with improved weapon systems parts. The Committee encourages 

the Secretary of Defense to research creative applications for additive manufacturing technology. 

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER 

The budget request includes $44,246,000 for Systems Engineering. The Committee recommendation provides $44,746,000, an increase of $500,000 above the budget request to support the Systems 

Engineering Research Center, a systems-oriented study to assess 

the current state of the Army's lethality capability and to provide 

actionable recommendations to transform it at the enterprise level. 

These recommendations should address multiple dimensions, including technologies, development and acquisition processes, personnel requirements, doctrine, structure and govemance, and infra· 

structure. The intent of these recommendations should have the cumulative intent to transform the Army's lethality capability. 

CONVENTIONAL PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE 

The Committee remains interested in the Department's development efforts for a conventional prompt global strike capability. 

Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Defense to 

submit a report to the congressional defense committees not later 

than 120 days after the enactment of this Act, on the Department's 

ability, or likelihood thereof, to field a conventional prompt global 

strike capability by fiscal year 2019. The report should incorporate 

findings from the recently completed conventional prompt global 
272 

strike land-based study. The report may include a classified annex 

if necessary. 

OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation . ................................ $246,800,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ............ ................................ 167,738,000 

Committee recommendation ..... . ................................... , ... , 248,238,000 

Change from budget request ...... ........................................... +80,500,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $248,238,000 for 

Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense. The total amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal 

year 2015: 
273 

(DOLLARS IN fHOU~.O.Nll!:>) 

OPEAATION.O.L TEST AND EVALUATION, OffftiSE 

RDTBE IIANAGEHBIT SUPPORT 

OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION. 

LlVE FIRE TESTING 

OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES. 

TOTAl, ROT&E KA~GEHENT SUPPORT. 

TOTAL. OPERATtOWIL TEST AHO EVALUATION, DEFENSE. 

BUDGET CDI"Il TTEE CHANGE fR~ 

REQUEST RECOHHEMOEO REQUEST 

" "' 14,S83 

" "' "· ,., ~8. 013 "' "' +60,500 

···--··---·· 167.736 248.238 +80,500 

167 '738 248. ~38 +80' 500 
274 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSIS 

Electronrc Warfare Test Capabrlity-transfer lrom 

RDTE,OW line l37 

48,013 

Commrttee recommended 

128,513 

80,500 

Change ffOm 

request 

80,500 
TITLE V 

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS 

DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ..... ........................ $1,649,214,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request .......................... ............................ 1,234,468,000 

Committee recommendation .. ......................... ................... 1,334,468,000 

Change from budget request ..... ................... ................. +100,000,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,334,468,000 

for the Defense Working Capital Funds accounts. The total amount 

recommended in the bill will provide the following pogram in fiscal 

year 2015: 

EXPLANATION Of PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands ol dollars] 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE . 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 

DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 

Program increase 

TOTAL, DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUNOS . 

(275) 

Budget 

request 

13.727 

61,717 

44,293 

1.114,731 

1,234.468 

Comm1ttee recommended 

13.727 

61,7[7 

44,293 

1.214,731 

100,000 

1.334,468 

Change hom request 

100,000 

100,000 

TITLE VI 

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation . ............... $32,699,158,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ....................................... 31,994,918,000 

Committee recommendation . ........................ 31,634,870,000 

Change from budget request ..................... ....................................... -360,048,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $31,634,870,000 

for the Defense Health Program. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 

(277) 
278 

(OOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 

8UOO~T COIIII!TTEE CHANGE FROH 

REQUEST RECO"HENOED ~EOUEST 

. ··-·------····------

DEFENSE. HEALTH PROGRAH 

OPEAATlOtl AND HAHITE~ANCE 

10 IN-HOUSE CARE 8.7~,086 8,680,090 -118.998 

20 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE. " 412.~99 \4.582. 044 ·630,555 

30 CONSOLIDATED HEAL Ttl SUPPORT 462,09(; 2,347,972 -114 '" 40 INfORMATION ~NAGEHENT. 1,557,347 1,534,096 ., "' 50 MNAGEHENT ACTIVITIES. 366,223 364.192 -~ ,031 

60 EOVCAT!ON liND TRAINING .. 750.866 738,475 -12,391 

70 BASE Q?ERAT!OHSICOMMUNJCJITIONS. 1,883,694 1.833,694 +1.50' 000 

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MINTENANCE. " ,, "' 30. oso' 563 ·951.348 

PROCURE/lENT 

180 INITIAL OUfFITTING. " '" 13,057 

170 RE.PLACE11ENT AND ~ODERN!2ATION '" '" 283.030 

1a0 THEATER HEDICAL JNFORHATION PROGRAM 3, 14~ 3, ,., 190 INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (IEHR) "' "' SUBTOTAL, PROCUREMENT .. 308,413 308,413 

RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EYALUATION 

!10 RESEARCH. 10,317 10,317 

'" EXPLORATORY O€VELOPMENT .. 49.015- 49.015 

'" ADVANCED OEYELOPMENT. 22.6,410 226,410 

"' DEIIONSTAATIONIVALIOAT10M., 97' 787 97.787 

"' ENGINEERING DEVELOPHENT. 217.898 217,898 

'" HAN/IGEHENT AND SUPPORT. 38' 075 38,075 

"' CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT 15.092 15,092 

'" UNOISnliBUTEO MEDICAL RESEARCH. 591 ,300 -t-591 ,300 

SUBTOTAL, RESEARCH DEVEL!lP!1ENT TEST AND EVALli ... TION 654. 594 1,245,894 +591 '300 

-------·--·- TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. J1,S9~.91B 31 '634' 610 -360,0~8 

==~s•n•••~• ••n~••""""'"' ""'~~'""'"'"'""'""' 
279 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT I.EVELAOJUSTMENTS 

[In tnousande of dollartl] 

IN-HOUSE CARE 

NiCOE satellites- growth overate ted In justtficatior. 

mater~ats 

FECA expenses· translt!r not propertv accounted 

Army iOOrltilied e•ceu 

Beneftt rsform pro!Klsal- unauthorized 

Benefit reform proposal- unauthorized 

SOC OM embedd!ld behaviGral health providers -transfer 

fromOM,OW 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE 

Histcric;:~l underexm:ution 

Ptlarmaceut,eal dr~.~gs- 8¢$$S growth 

Program eOjuetment to restore benefit ,D!'OPOSBI& 

Printing and reproductioo. e~cess growth 

Benelit reform proposal- Uflilulhonzed 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT 

Historical underexeC~.Jtion 

Program increase- woundecl wenior mmtary adapalille 

Spotts program 

Travel nuluction ·not praperly eccounted 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 

Other intra-go\lernm&nt purchne•- unju5tlfiBd grow1h 

Travel reduction· not property 8tcounted 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 

Reduct•on ,n CiVIlian FTE~ • not properly acccuntlld 

Travel reduct•on • ~ol proper!~ accounted 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING 

Trave• red\Jclion. not propert~ ~counted 

BASE OPERATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 

A1r Force FSRM for medic!ll faci•ilie& 

Army FSRM fOI' medicai 1acll•lles 

Nally FSRM lor 1'11@diCEII fac•lrti&S 

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAifotTENANCE 

PROCUREMENT 

RESEARCH AND OEVELOPM!"'T 

Peer-reviewed alcohol and substance abuse (tlaorders 

r~search 

Peer-reviewed ALS research 

Peer-re~•ewed etzhaimer researd1 

Peer-rev•ewed au~sm renarctl 

Peer-reviewed bone marrow failure Olsease re~;earch 

Peer-reviewed breast cancer research 

Pelilr-reviewed canc.r research 

Peer-re""ewed Ducllenne mu.eular dystrophy research 

Peer-revrewe:l gulf war illni!U re1ean:h 

Peer-r~viewed lung ~<~~ncer research 

B.711ii,086 

111,411,599 

1.557,341 

366,223 

750,866 

1,683,694 

31,031,1111 

308,413 

Committee 

Reeommended 

8,880,0110 

·'" -377 

-76,000 

-30.000 

·26.715 

14.800 

14,582,044 

-750,000 

·200.000 

180,000 

·2,555 

-~.000 

2,347,972 

-100.000 

5,000 

-19,124 

1,534,096 

·22.300 

-tl51 

364,192 

-770 

-1,261 

738,475 

·12.391 

1,833,894 

50,000 

50,000 

50,000 

30,080,583 

308,4U 

4.000 

7,500 

12,000 

6,000 

3,200 

120,000 

15,000 

3.200 

20,000 

10,500 

Change from 

lt891,1ttet 

-118,998 

·114,124 

-23,251 

·2,03t 

·12,391 

HiO,DOO 

-9!1,343 

0 
Peer-rev,ewttd multiple 1elerosis research 

Peer-re~oewed Dl1hapedic r&uerch 

Ptter-rev>ew8(1 ovant~n canc;~:~r r11search 

"'--revoew&d prostale ~ncer reeearch 

Peer-rev>eWed spinal cord research 

280 

Peer-revoew11d reoon&tl'uc1ive traneplani research 

PQ{!r-rev'llWed traumatic 111arn Injury and psychological 

health research 

Peer-reviewed tuberous scleroso8 compleJC research 

Peer-reviewed vision r9search 

Glob;l HIVIAIOS preventan 

HIV/A!O~ progrem Increase 

Joint warf1ghter medical research 

Therapeutk: &&rvlca dO{I training program 

TOTAL, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 654,594 

Committee Reeommem!ed 

5,000 

30,000 

20.000 

80,000 

30.000 

15.000 

125,000 

8,000 

10,000 

8,000 

12,900 

45,000 

3,000 

Chtoge from 

Reqll!llll 

691,300 
281 

REPROGRAMMING GUIDANCE FOR THE DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

The Committee remains concerned regarding the transfer of 

funds from the In-House Care budget sub-activity to pay for contractor-provided medical care. To limit such transfers and improve 

oversight within the Defense Health Program operation and maintenance account, the Committee includes a provision which caps 

the funds available for Private Sector Care under the TRICARE 

program subject to prior approval reprogramming procedures. The 

provision and accompanying report language included by the Committee should not be interpreted as limiting the amount of funds 

that may be transferred to the In-House Care budget sub-activity 

from other budget sub-activities within the Defense Health Program. In addition, the Committee continues to designate the funding for the In-House Care budget sub-activity as a congressional 

special interest item. Any transfer of funds from the In-House Care 

budget sub-activity into the Private Sector Care budget sub-activity 

or any other budget sub-activity will require the Secretary of Defense to follow prior approval reprogramming procedures for operation and maintenance funds. 

The Committee also remains concerned with continual reports 

that substantial amounts of funding are transferred from the Private Sector Care budget sub-activity without the submission of 

written notification as required by prior year Department of Defense Appropriations Acts. The Committee directs the Secretary of 

Defense to provide written notification to the congressional defense 

committees of cumulative transfers in excess of $10,000,000 out of 

the Private Sector Care budget sub-activity not later than fifteen 

days after such a transfer. Furthermore, the Committee directs the 

Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days after the enactment of this 

Act that delineates transfers of funds in excess of $10,000,000, and 

the dates any transfers occurred, from the Private Sector Care 

budget sub-activity to any other budget sub-activity groups for fiscal years 2012, 2013, and 2014. 

The Committee further directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense 

(Health Mfairs) to provide quarterly reports to the congressional 

defense committees on budget execution data for all of the Defense 

Health Program budget activities and to adequately reflect changes 

to the budget activities requested by the Services in future budget 

submissions. 

CARRYOVER AUTHORITY 

For fiscal year 2015, the Committee recommends one percent carryover authority for the operation and maintenance account of the 

Defense Health Program. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to submit a detailed spending 

plan for any fiscal year 2014 designated carryover funds to the congressional defense committees not less than 30 days prior to executing the carryover funds. 

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD 

The Committee has grown increasingly alarmed about the inability of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs to develop 
282 

and procure interoperable electronic health records. Despite the 

mandate for full interoperability included in the National Defense 

Authorization Act for fiscal year 2008 and significant funding investments, the two Departments still do not have electronic health 

record systems that are able to meaningfully exchange patient 

data. 

The Committee is deeply concerned with the lack of progress by 

the two Departments to achieve full interoperability and believes 

that there must be more cooperation throughout the two Departments to find, develop, and implement the best solution that will 

allow interoperability in a timely manner. The Committee understands that the two Departments have begun implementation of a 

temporary system that allows some administrators and clinicians 

to view and manipulate patient data; however, the number of providers that has access to this system is extremely limited at this 

point. Additionally, while this system is designed to improve interoperability in the near term, the Committee remains concerned 

about interoperability in the future, when each Department will 

have a different records system than what is currently in use. 

The Committee includes a provision that restricts the amount of 

funding that may be obligated for the Interagency Program Office 

(!PO), the Defense Healthcare Management Systems Modernization (DHMSM) program, and the Defense Information Management 

Exchange CDMIX) to 25 percent of the funding provided until the 

Secretary of Defense provides the House and Senate Appropriations Committees an expenditure plan that includes numerous reporting requirements. 

Furthermore, the Committee directs the IPO to continue to provide quarterly reports on the progress of interoperability between 

the two Departments to the House and Senate Subcommittees on 

Appropriations for Defense and the House and Senate Subcommittees on Appropriations for Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, 

and Related Agencies. 

The Committee reminds the Program Executive Officer (PEO) of 

the Defense Healthcare Management Systems (DHMS) to not lose 

sight of the ultimate goal of interoperability with the enhanced 

health record system of the Department of Veterans Affairs. The 

PEO DHMS, in conjunction with the director of the !PO, is directed 

to provide quarterly reports to the congressional defense committees on the cost and schedule of the program, to include milestones, 

knowledge points, and acquisition timelines, as well as quarterly 

obligation reports. The Committee further directs the PEO DHMS 

to continue briefing the House and Senate Defense Appropriations 

Subcommittees on a quarterly basis, coinciding with the report submission. 

JOINT WAR>'IGHTER MEDICAL RESEARCH PROGRAM 

The Committee recommendation includes $45,000,000 for the 

continuation of the joint warfighter medical research program. The 

funding shall be used to augment and accelerate high priority Department of Defense and Service medical requirements and to continue prior year initiatives that are close to achieving their objectives and yielding a benefit to military medicine. The funding shall 

not be used for new projects nor for basic research, and it shall be 
283 

awarded at the discretion of the Secretary of Defense following a 

review of medical research and development gaps as well as 

unfinanced medical requirements of the Services. Further, the 

Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act to the congressional defense committees which 

lists the projects that receive funding. The report should include 

the funding amount awarded to each project, a thorough description of each project's research, and the benefit the research will 

provide to the Department of Defense. 

PEER-REVIEWED CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAMS 

The Committee recommendation includes $120,000,000 for the 

peer-reviewed breast cancer research program, $80,000,000 for the 

peer-reviewed prostate cancer research program, $20,000,000 for 

the peer-reviewed ovarian cancer research program, $10,500,000 

for the peer-reviewed lung cancer research program, and 

$15,000,000 for the peer-reviewed cancer research program that 

would research cancers not addressed in the aforementioned programs currently executed by the Department of Defense. 

The funds provided in the peer-reviewed cancer research program are directed to be used to conduct research in the following 

areas: colo rectal cancer, genetic cancer research, kidney cancer, listeria vaccine for cancer, liver cancer, melanoma and other skin cancers, mesothelioma, pancreatic cancer, stomach cancer, and the link 

between scleroderma and cancer. 

The funds provided under the peer-reviewed cancer research program shall be used only for the purposes listed above. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) 

to provide a report not later than 180 days after the enactment of 

this Act to the congressional defense committees on the status of 

the peer-reviewed cancer research program. For each research 

area, the report should include the funding amount awarded, the 

progress of the research, and the relevance of the research to 

servicemembers and their families. 

The Committee continues to support the establishment of a task 

force to focus on research for metastasized cancer with a focus on 

clinical and translational research aimed at extending the lives of 

advanced stage and recurrent patients. The Committee directs the 

Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to submit a report 

to the congressional defense committees not later than 60 days 

after the enactment of this Act on the status of establishing such 

a task force. 

PEER-REVIEWED PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAM 

The Committee recommends $80,000,000 for the peer-reviewed 

prostate cancer research program. The Committee is aware that 

the pace of prostate cancer research may possibly be enhanced 

through the use of data derived from large patient studies that include long-term health records, bio-specimen repositories, and preexisting research. The Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to support research that applies 

state-of-the-art proteomic analysis, bioinformatics, and mathe-
284 

matical models to such data to improve disease classification, risk 

assessment, education, treatment, and management. 

INTELLIGENT PROSTHETICS 

The Committee recommends $30,000,000 for the peer-reviewed 

orthopedics research program. The Committee is aware that many 

of the injuries sustained by servicemembers in combat include multiple limb trauma and are often distinct from trauma typically seen 

in the civilian environment, thus requiring a unique solution set. 

The Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense 

(Health Affairs) to support research at the intersection of bioengineering, neuroscience, and rehabilitation to support neural 

interfaces to peripheral nerves and advanced prosthetics that deliver more functionality to amputees. 

PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE 

The Committee remains concerned with pain management prescription medication dependency among servicemembers. It is imperative that proper steps are taken to prevent overmedication and 

that treatment options are available for those facing possible addiction. The Committee recognizes that the Department of Defense 

currently provides a range of medication therapy management 

services at military treatment facilities. These services are desigoed to optimize therapy or the adherence to therapy between 

providers, pharmacists, and patients. The Committee directs the 

Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report 

not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act to the congressional defense committees detailing the progress of including 

pharmacists in the care team provided by the Patient Centered 

Medical Home (PCMH), the success rate of patients in properly adhering to medicine treatment and prescription levels, and if there 

have been cases in which the inclusion of a pharmacist in the 

PCMH has contributed to reducing the level of medication taken by 

patients who may have been overmedicating. 

HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY 

Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are the signature wounds of more than a decade of 

conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Since 2000, the military has accounted for more than 280,000 cases of traumatic brain injury and 

nearly 120,000 diagooses of new post-traumatic stress disorder. Patients suffering from these conditions are often prescribed various 

psychotropic drugs to ease their symptoms. These drugs often have 

negative side effects and carry the risk of leading to dependency. 

The Committee understands that the Department of Defense has 

studied the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an alternative 

treatment for servicemembers suffering from TBI and PTSD. 

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy involves breathing pure oxygen in a 

pressurized room which allows for the intake of more oxygen. The 

oxygen enters the bloodstream and stimulates the release of growth 

factors and stem cells, which, in turn, promote healing. The Committee understands that although private sector research has 

shown positive effects of using the therapy, the Department of De-
285 

fense has decided not to pursue its use, citing that clinical trials 

failed to show positive results. 

The Committee directs the Comptroller General of the United 

States to conduct a review and provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act on the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat 

TBI and PTSD. The report should include a review of the clinical 

trials completed by the Department of Defense, an assessment of 

the conclusions reached by the trials, an assessment of whether the 

trials were appropriately administered, and a review of private sector research on the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and whether 

those conclusions are similar or different from the Department of 

Defense study. 

CHILDHOOD TRAUMA IN MILITARY DEPENDENTS 

The Committee is concerned with the rise in outpatient mental 

health visits among children of active duty and reserve servicemembers. The Committee believes that it is imperative to develop 

efficient means to identify children at risk of deployment-related 

mental health issues and to provide tools, education, and guidance 

to the professionals and families caring for these children. It is also 

important that the proper steps are taken to prevent predictable 

mental health problems from manifesting in dependent children. 

The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to make the 

prevention of childhood trauma in military dependents a priority. 

AIR FORCE MILITARY ACUITY MODEL TRAINING PROGRAM 

The Committee understands that the Air Force Military Acuity 

Model has provided benefits such as more efficient and improved 

access to care. The Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary 

of Defense (Health Affairs) to consider expanding use of the model 

throughout the military health system. 

TRAUMA CLINICAL RESEARCH REPOSITORY 

Traumatic injuries continue to cause nearly all combat deaths, as 

well as many in the general civilian population. Numerous advances in trauma care have been achieved through the medical research undertaken by the Department of Defense; this life-saving 

impact of trauma research can be seen on the battlefield and in civilian trauma response. To capitalize on these important research 

investments, the Committee included $5,000,000 in the Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 to create a trauma 

clinical research repository accessible to both public and private researchers. With the projected decline in military funding as a result of the imminent end of combat operations, there remains an 

urgency to maintain the momentum on advances in trauma care 

and bridge the lessons learned from the military to civilian communities. The trauma clinical research repository will help breakthroughs in research lead to significant advances in treatment, particularly for battlefield injuries. Data shared in the trauma repository should be utilized for future research, such as studies to identify biomarkers of trauma-related organ dysfunction or studies on 

new life~saving pharmaceuticals. 
286 

The Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense 

(Health Affairs) and the Director of the Defense Health Agency to 

fully implement the trauma clinical research repository and to collaborate with other federal entities to create a task force to identify 

existing critical research gaps. Future research must focus on these 

gaps to supplement advances in care achieved over the past decade 

of combat operations, translate the lessons learned into the civilian 

community, and maintain the momentum in trauma research. 

TELEMEDICINE 

The Committee is aware of the advantages of using telemedicine 

to enhance medical care provided to servicemembers while at home 

or when deployed around the world. 

The use of telemedicine increases access to care, reduces patient 

and specialist travel, decreases lost work times, and saves money 

by avoiding referrals to the private sector. 

The Committee supports expanding telemedicine projects that 

can lower the cost of military health care and maintain the skill 

proficiencies of military medical personnel. The Committee encourages the Service Surgeons General to appropriately fund and expand telemedicine initiatives, particularly for beneficiaries at overseas military treatment facilities. 

PRESERVATION OF MUSCLE MASS DURING IMMOBILIZATION PERIODS 

The Committee believes that high-level motor performance and 

endurance is critical for servicemembers in combat. While servicemembers typically have above average skeletal muscle strength 

and relative resistance to fatigability, during long periods of immobilization, which can occur in theater, while traveling, or when 

recuperating from injuries, muscle de-training often occurs. The 

Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health 

Affairs) to support research on training that enhances muscle fitness and decelerates the process of muscle de-training. 

COOPERATION BETWEEN MILITARY MEDICAL FACILITIES, CIVILIAN 

HEALTHCARE FACILITIES, AND UNIVERSITIES 

The Committee recognizes the importance of cooperation between 

military medical facilities, universities, and other civilian partners 

to provide valuable medical trauma training to sustain the education of military medical providers. This training and real-life experience contributes to maintaining the capabilities of the National 

Guard Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Explosives 

Enhanced Response Force Packages, the National Guard Homeland 

Response Forces, and the Army Reserve Consequence Management 

Response Forces. 

The Committee encourages the Service Surgeons General and the 

Chief of the National Guard Bureau to continue to pursue trauma 

training with civilian partners in order to maintain unit medical 

readiness at optimum levels as military healthcare providers maintain their individual skills to respond effectively to emergency incidents. 
287 

CANINE THERAPY RESEARCH 

The Committee is aware of the potential benefits of canine therapy for treatment of servicemembers suffering from traumatic 

brain injuries (TBI) or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). 

While still experimental, canine therapy may be a promising alternative to pharmaceutical treatment. 

The Committee understands that the Department of Defense is 

currently studying if and why canines can help servicemembers 

cope with debilitating injuries and whether this treatment can be 

substantially utilized in the future. The Committee encourages the 

Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to continue this research to evaluate the effectiveness of canine therapy in treating 

servicemembers suffering from TBI and PTSD. 

THERMAL INJURY PREVENTION 

The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to establish 

standards to prevent thermal injuries caused by ground combat 

and tactical vehicles. Survivability enhancement efforts such as fire 

prevention, fire suppression, and fuel containment should continually be addressed in order to provide the best possible protection 

for servicemembers. 

EFFICIENCY OF PATIENT CARE DELIVERY 

The Committee understands the necessity of developing technologies to improve the efficiency of patient care in military treatment facilities. The Committee recognizes that, in the event of a 

mass casualty, military treatment facilities would experience a significant increase in patient volume. The ability to maximize efficiency and effectiveness of care would be critical to the management of an overwhelming surge in patient volume and intensity. 

The Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense 

(Health Affairs) to research the development of an automated resource management system to improve patient care, both in normal 

and emergency situations. 

MILITARY MENTAL HEALTH PILOT PROGRAM 

The Committee is pleased that the Secretary of Defense created 

a pilot program to improve efforts to treat servicemembers suffering from mental health disorders in the National Guard and reserve components through community partnerships. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense to expand this program 

to include additional community partners through a competitive 

and merit-based award process. 

MULTI-DISCIPLINARY BRAIN RESEARCH 

The Committee supports the pursuance of multi-disciplinary research toward translational medicine that may provide better diagnostic tools and treatment outcomes for servicemembers who suffer 

from traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, and 

other neurotrauma. The Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to support researchers, scientists, 

and health care professionals in this field and to encourage them 

to share their findings with the Department of Defense. With prop-
288 

er support, translational research in this field could lead to the integration of new treatments in military treatment facilities and 

could improve care in the near-term. 

ACCESS TO MILITARY TREATMENT FACILITIES 

The Committee is aware of unobligated balances remaining from 

funds appropriated in section 8110 of the Department of Defense 

Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2011. The Committee believes 

that these unobligated balances should be utilized for the purposes 

for which originally appropriated. Accordingly, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense committees not later than 60 days after the enactment of this Act on any remaining balances from funds appropriated in section 8110 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2011. The report shall include the amount 

of remaining balances and an execution plan for these funds that 

will improve access to the Department's military treatment facili~ 

ties. 

CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, 

DEFENSE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ................................................ . 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request 

Committee recommendation . . . .............................. .. 

Change from budget request ........................ . 

$1,004,123,000 

828,868,000 

828,868,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $828,868,000 for 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2015: 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .. 

PROCUREMENT .. 

[In thousands of dollars] 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION .. 

TOTAL, CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE . 

Budget Commrttee Changt! from 

request recommended request 

222,728 

10.227 

595,913 

828,868 

222.728 

10,227 

595,913 

828,868 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 

DEFENSE 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .................. $1,015,885,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request 820,687,000 

Committee recommendation ................. ................... ........................ 944,687,000 

Change from budget request ... ..................................... +124,000,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $944,687,000 for 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2015: 
NON-OPIOID PAIN MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT 

The Committee remains concerned with pain management prescription 

medication dependency and addiction among servicemembers. Many 

servicemembers have endured physical and emotional wounds associated with 

combat and have relied on prescription opioids, sometimes for years, to manage 

their pain. While over-prescription of narcotics is a problem that must be 

addressed, the Committee believes that all patients have the right to effective relief 

of both acute and chronic pain. Narcotic abuse requires a multi-pronged approach, 

but the development of non-narcotic pain relief strategies is an essential 

component. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary of 

Defense (Health Affairs) to establish a peer-reviewed research program to research 

and develop alternatives to opioid-based pain management. 
289 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budge! 

request 

COUNTER-NARCOTICS SUPPORT . 719,096 

Transfer to National Guard counter-drug proeram . 

Program Increase . 

DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM 101.591 

Young Marines-drug demand reduction . 

NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM . 

Transfer from counter-narcotics support . 

Program mcrease . 

TOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES. DEFENSE . 820,687 

Committee 

recDmmended 

669,631 

- 89,465 

40,000 

105,591 

4,000 

169,465 

89,465 

80,000 

944,687 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES 

Change from request 

-49,465 

4,000 

169,465 

124,000 

The Committee remains concerned about the continued decrease 

in funding for the Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 

Defense account. The efforts being funded in this account are instrumental in not just monitoring, detecting, and interdicting drug 

shipments on their way into the United States, but in providing intelligence support to track laundered drug money that often flows 

to transnational crime organizations. Drug trafficking remains a 

major source of funding for terrorist organizations and contributes 

to violence in parts of the United States and instability in many 

other countries. The Committee understands the unique capabilities that the Department of Defense has in supporting this mission, 

and recommends an additional $40,000,000 specifically for counternarcotics support. 

BUDGET JUSTIFICATION MATERIAL 

The Committee understands that the funding included in the 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense account is 

divided into three major categories of funding: counter-narcotics 

support, the drug demand reduction program, and the National 

Guard counter-drug program. The Committee recommends dividing 

the funding into three separate sub-activity groups to provide 

greater transparency and oversight of the program and its budget 

execution. In lieu of formal reprogramming guidance and restrictions, the Committee directs the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Counter-narcotics and Global Threats) to provide written notification to the congressional defense committees not less than 15 

days before transferring funding in excess of $5,000,000 between 

any lines. In addition, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to request funding for each separate sub-activity group under 

the Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense account in the fiscal year 2016 budget submission and subsequent 

budget years. 

NATIONAL GUARD STATE PLANS 

The Committee is disappointed that, for the third year in a row, 

the budget request underfunds the National Guard counter-drug 

program. The Committee recognizes the importance of the mission 

of the National Guard counter-drug program as a support organiza-
290 

tion to combatant commands and federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. To help address the lack of funding of this important program, the Committee recommends an additional 

$80,000,000 for fiscal year 2015. 

JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ........................................ . Fiscal year 2015 budget request ... .................... ................. $115,058,000 

Committee recommendation ....................................... ................ 65,464,000 

Change from budget request .................... ................. -49,594,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $65,464,000 for 

the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. The total 

amount recommended in the bill will provide the following program 

in fiscal year 2015: 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS 

Car["1over 

Elcess to need . 

CIVILIAN PERSONNEl 

MOBILIZATION DESIGNEES . 

[In thousands of dollars] 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIONS ..... 

FACILITIES .. 

TRAVEL . 

OTHER ISUpPUES) . 

TOTAL, JOINT lEO DEFEAT FUND 

Budget CDmm1ttee Change from request recommended request 

49,594 -49,594 

-10,000 

-39,594 

38,001 38,001 

6,683 6,683 

7,300 7,300 

12,032 12,032 

624 624 

824 824 

115,058 65,464 -49,594 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ................................................... .. Fiscal year 2015 budget request .... .................. ............................... $20,000,000 

Committee recommendation ........................... . Change from budget request ............................... - 20,000,000 

The Committee recommends no funding for the Joint Urgent 

Operational Needs Fund. 

SUPPORT FOR INTERNATIONAL SPORTING COMPETITIONS 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation . Fiscal year 2015 budget request .......... .................. $10,000,000 

Committee recommendation . . ................. 10,000,000 

Change from budget request ..................................................... .. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $10,000,000 for 

Support for International Sporting Competitions. 

SUPPORT FOR INTERNATIONAL SPORTING COMPETITIONS 

The Committee understands that the Support for International 

Sporting Competitions Fund is one way in which the Department 

of Defense helps support people with disabilities. The Support for 

International Sporting Competitions Fund proposed for fiscal year 

2015 is a no-year appropriation that provides $10,000,000 for continuing Department of Defense support to national and inter-
291 

national sporting events. In addition, the Committee is aware that 

funds remain available from the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2003. The Committee supports the request 

for fiscal year 2015 and expects the Secretary of Defense to allocate 

remaining prior year funds towards this effort. The Committee 

would entertain a reprogramming of funds if required for proper 

execution of these funds to fully support these events. 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .............. . Fiscal year 2015 budget request 

Committee recommendation ............................. . Change from budget request ................... .. ............ . 

$316,000,000 

311,830,000 

311,830,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $311,830,000 for 

the Office of the Inspector General. The total amount recommended 

in the bill will provide the following program in fiscal year 2015: 

EXPLANATION OF PROJECT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

PROCUREMENT 

[In thousands ol dollars] 

TOTAL, OFfiCE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL .. 

Budget CDmm~tee ChanRe from request recommended request 

310,830 

1.000 

311,830 

310,830 

1,000 

311,830 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

Since 2008, Congress has provided the Department of Defense 

Inspector General (DODIG) with additional funding to support increased audit, investigative, assessment, and evaluation capabilities, commonly referred to as the DODIG Growth Plan. The N ationa! Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2013 directed the 

DODIG to provide an updated requirements plan to establish future staffing objectives based on oversight needs and current budgetary realities. The Committee understands that the Inspector 

General is currently reviewing future DODIG funding requirements to support its ability to conduct robust oversight and reduce 

waste, fraud, and abuse in the Department. The Committee believes that the DODIG must have a robust and stable source of 

funding to operate effectively and efficiently, and it was pleased to 

see that the fiscal year 2015 budget supports stable funding for the 

DODIG compared to previous fiscal years. The Committee remains 

supportive of the revised DODIG funding requirement, which balances both current fiscal realities and its oversight needs, and it 

directs the Secretary of Defense to request full funding for the 

DO DIG in the fiscal year 2016 budget request and the future years 

defense plan. 

TITLE VII 

RELATED AGENCIES 

NATIONAL AND MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 

The National Intelligence Program and the Military Intelligence 

Program budgets funded in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act consist primarily of resources for the Director of National 

Intelligence including the Intelligence Community Management 

staff, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office, the National 

Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the 

intelligence services of the Departments of the Army, Navy, Air 

Force, and the CIA Retirement and Disability fund. 

CLASSIFIED ANNEX 

The Committee's budget review of classified programs is published in a separate, detailed, and comprehensive classified annex. 

The intelligence community, Department of Defense, and other organizations are expected to fully comply with the recommendations 

and directions in the classified annex accompanying the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2015. 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY RETIREMENT AND 

DISABILITY SYSTEM FUND 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation ........... . ...................................... . Fiscal year 2015 budget request .................................................... . Committee recommendation ............................................................ . Change from budget request .......................... ,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .... , 

$5I4,000,000 

514,000,000 

514,000,000 

This appropriation provides payments of benefits to qualified 

beneficiaries in accordance with the Central Intelligence Agency 

Retirement Act of 1964 for Certain Employees (P.L. 88--643), as 

amended by Public Law 94-522. This statute authorized the establishment of the CIA Retirement and Disability System for certain 

employees and authorized the establishment and maintenance of a 

fund from which benefits would be paid to those beneficiaries. 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $514,000,000 for 

the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System 

Fund. This is a mandatory account. 

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 

Fiscal year 2014 appropriation .......... $528,229,000 

Fiscal year 2015 budget request ...... ................................................ 510,194,000 

Comm1ttee recommendation .......................................... 501,194,000 

Change from budget request ......................................... ................... ~ 9,000,000 

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $501,194,000 for 

the Intelligence Community Management Account. 

(293) 
294 

The Committee understands that there is confusion within the 

Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) as to whether 

section 8105 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act for fiscal year 

2014 impacts or otherwise hinders the ability of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to take actions necessary to improve its budget processes by implementing capability-based budget formulation 

and execution. As the Committee has previously indicated to the 

ODNI, nothing in this section is intended to inhibit or otherwise 

preclude the CIA from continuing its ongoing efforts to implement 

an activity/capability-based budget as has been directed in the appropriations Acts. Nothing in this Act, Committee report, or classified annex accompanying the report, is intended to preclude, nor 

shall it be construed as precluding the CIA from conducting any 

further such activity or capability-based budget activities. 

WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING 

The Committee is concerned that wildlife poaching and trafficking, particularly of Mrican elephant ivory, can be used as a 

source of funding by terrorist organizations, extremist militias, and 

transnational organized crime syndicates in Central and Eastern 

Africa. The Committee encourages the Director of National Intelligence to work with American and international law enforcement 

and partner countries to share information and analysis on 

transnational criminal organizations, terrorist entities, corrupt officials, and others that facilitate illegal wildlife trafficking. 
TITLE VIII 

GENERAL PROVISIONS 

The accompanying bill includes 138 general provisions. Most of 

these provisions were included in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 and many have been included 

in the Defense Appropriations Acts for a number of years. A description of each provision follows. 

Section 8001 provides that no funds made available in this Act 

may be used for publicity or propaganda purposes not authorized 

by Congress. 

Section 8002 provides for conditions and limitations on the payment of compensation to, or employment of, foreign nationals. 

Section 8003 provides that no funds made available in this Act 

may be obligated beyond the end of the fiscal year unless expressly 

provided for a greater period of availability elsewhere in the Act. 

Section 8004 provides a 20 percent limitation on the obligation 

of certain funds provided in this Act during the last two months 

of the fiscal year. 

Section 8005 has been amended and provides for the general 

transfer authority of working capital funds to other military functions. 

Section 8006 has been amended and provides that the tables titled "Explanation of Project Level Adjustments" in the Committee 

report and classified annex shall be carried out in the manner provided by the tables to the same extent as if the tables were included in the text of this Act. 

Section 8007 provides for the establishment of a baseline for application of reprogramming and transfer authorities for the current 

fiscal year. 

Section 8008 provides for limitations on the use of transfer authority of working capital fund cash balances. 

Section 8009 provides that none of the funds appropriated in this 

Act may be used to initiate a special access program without prior 

notification to the congressional defense committees. 

Section 8010 has been amended and provides limitations and 

conditions on the use of funds made available in this Act to initiate 

multi-year contracts. 

Section 8011 provides for the use and obligation of funds for humanitarian and civic assistance costs under chapter 20 of title 10, 

United States Code. 

Section 8012 has been amended and provides that civilian personnel of the Department of Defense may not be managed on the 

basis of end strength or be subject to end strength limitations. 

Section 8013 prohibits funding from being used to influence congressional action on any matters pending before the Congress. 

(295) 
296 

Section 8014 prohibits compensation from being paid to any 

member of the Army who is participating as a full-time student 

and who receives benefits from the Education Benefits Fund when 

time spent as a full-time student is counted toward that member's 

service commitment. 

Section 8015 provides for the transfer of funds appropriated in 

title III of this Act for the Department of Defense Pilot MentorProtege Program. 

Section 8016 provides for the Department of Defense to purchase 

anchor and mooring chains manufactured only in the United 

States. 

Section 8017 has been amended and makes permanent the prohibition of funds made available to the Department of Defense from 

being used to demilitarize or dispose of certain surplus firearms 

and small arms ammunition or ammunition components. 

Section 8018 provides a limitation on funds being used for the relocation of any Department of Defense entity into or within the National Capital Region. 

Section 8019 has been amended and provides for incentive payments authorized by section 504 of the Indian Financing Act of 

1974 (25 U.S.C. 1544). 

Section 8020 provides that no funding for the Defense Media Activity may be used for national or international political or psychological activities. 

Section 8021 provides for the obligation of funds for purposes 

specified in section 2350j(c) of title 10, United States Code, in anticipation of receipt of contributions from the Government of Kuwait. 

Section 8022 has been amended and provides funding for the 

Civil Air Patrol Corporation. 

Section 8023 has been amended and prohibits funding from being 

used to establish new Department of Defense Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC), with certain limitations 

and reduces funding provided for FFRDCs. 

Section 8024 provides for the Department of Defense to procure 

carbon, alloy, or armor steel plate melted and rolled only in the 

United States and Canada. 

Section 8025 defines the congressional defense committees as 

being the Armed Services Committees of the House of Representatives and the Senate and the Subcommittees on Defense of the 

Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and 

the Senate. 

Section 8026 provides for competitions between private firms and 

Department of Defense depot maintenance activities for modification, depot maintenance, and repair of aircraft, vehicles, and vessels, as well as the production of components and other defense-related articles. 

Section 8027 has been amended and provides for revocation of 

blanket waivers of the Buy American Act upon a finding that a 

country has violated a reciprocal defense procurement memorandum of understanding by discriminating against products produced in the United States that are covered by the agreement. 

Section 8028 provides for the availability of funds contained in 

the Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility Investment 
297 

Recovery Account for purposes specified in section 2921(c)(2) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 1991. 

Section 8029 provides for the conveyance, without consideration, 

of relocatable housing units that are excess to the needs of the Air 

Force located at Grand Forks Air Force Base, Malmstrom Air Force 

Base, Mountain Home Air Force Base, Ellsworth Air Force Base, 

and Minot Air Force Base to Indian Tribes located in the states of 

Nevada, Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Oregon, 

Minnesota, and Washington. 

Section 8030 provides authority to use operation and maintenance appropriations to purchase items having an investment item 

unit cost of not more than $250,000. 

Section 8031 has been amended and prohibits the use of Working 

Capital Funds to purchase specified investment items. 

Section 8032 has been amended and provides that none of the 

funds appropriated for the Central Intelligence Agency shall remain available for obligation beyond the current fiscal year except 

for funds appropriated for the Reserve for Contingencies, the Working Capital Fund, or other programs as specified. 

Section 8033 provides that funds available for the Defense Intelligence Agency may be used for the design, development, and deployment of General Defense Intelligence Program intelligence 

communications and intelligence information systems. 

Section 8034 provides for the availability of funds for the mitigation of environmental impacts on Indian lands resulting from Department of Defense activities. 

Section 8035 requires the Department of Defense to comply with 

the Buy American Act, chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code. 

Section 8036 provides conditions under which contracts for studies, analyses, or consulting services may be entered into without 

competition on the basis of an unsolicited proposal. 

Section 8037 places certain limitations on the use of funds made 

available in this Act to establish Field Operating Agencies. 

Section 8038 places restrictions on converting to contractor performance an activity or function of the Department of Defense unless it meets certain guidelines provided. 

(RESCISSIONS) 

Section 8039 has been amended and provides for the rescission 

of $964,648,000 from the following programs: 

2013 Appropriations: 

Aircraft Procurement, Army: 

MQ-1 payload ................................ . 

Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army: 

Howitzer, SP 155 109A6 .................. . ........................ . 

Other Procurement, Army: 

Mid-tier networking vehicular radio ................. . Aircraft Procurement, Navy: 

RQ-4 UAV ......................... . Weapons Procurement, Navy: 

Standard missile .............. .. 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force: 

C-130 modifications ... 

MQ-IB modifications .............. .. MQ-IB spares ...................... .. 

MQ-9 ................................................................................. . 

$27,000,000 

5,000,000 

30,000,000 

47,200,000 

27.000,000 

12,500,000 

16,300,000 

4,500,000 

37,800,000 
298 

Missile Procurement, Air Force: 

Minuteman III modifications 

Missile support equipment ....................... . 2014 Appropriations: 

Other Procurement, Army: 

JTRS HMS radio ....................................................... . WIN-T increment 2 ............................................. . Aircraft Procurement, Navy: 

Aviation life support modifications .................................. .. Common electronic countermeasures ............................... . E-20 hawkeye ................................. . ............................ .. F/A-18E/F advance procurement ... .. ........................... . P-8A contract savings .................................................... . 

Wea~y~:sffl:du;:o~:~sN~~: ...................... ........................... . 

Rolling airframe missile .............................................. . Sidewinder ............................................................. . Standard missile ..................... .. Tomahawk obsolescence ..................................................... . Other Procurement, Navy: 

National airspace system ............. .. ................... . Aircraft Procurement, Air Force: 

A-10 .................. . ............ . MQ-IB spares ............................ . Missile Procurement, Air Force: 

Evolved expendable launch vehicle 

Minuteman III modifications ............................................. . Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army: 

Biometric enabled intelligence .......................................... .. 

7,100,000 

6,700,000 

100,000,000 

100,000,000 

6,267,000 

17,355,000 

30,000,000 

75,000,000 

43,000,000 

25,000,000 

5,036,000 

5,000,000 

46,400,000 

10,000,000 

1,505,000 

45,300,000 

2,100,000 

118,685,000 

2,500,000 

5,000,000 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy: 

~Atk~b~~~i~~f:~ ~~.~~~-~-~ .. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~~:~88;888 Marine Corps combat services support . 6,600,000 

Section 8040 prohibits funds made available in this Act from 

being used to reduce authorized positions for military technicians 

(dual status) of the Army National Guard, Air National Guard, 

Army Reserve, and Air Force Reserve unless such reductions are 

a direct result of a reduction in military force structure. 

Section 8041 prohibits funding from being obligated or expended 

for assistance to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea unless 

specifically appropriated for that purpose. 

Section 8042 provides for reimbursement to the National Guard 

and reserve when members of the National Guard and reserve provide intelligence or counterintelligence support to the combatant 

commands, defense agencies, and joint intelligence activities. 

Section 8043 prohibits funds from being used to reduce civilian 

medical and medical support personnel assigned to military treatment facilities below the September 30, 2003 level unless the Service Surgeons General certif'y to the congressional defense committees that it is a responsible stewardship of resources to do so. 

Section 8044 has been amended and prohibits the transfer of Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agencies drug interdiction and counter-drug activity funds to other agencies except as 

specifically provided in an appropriations law. 

Section 8045 prohibits funding from being used for the procurement of ball and roller bearings other than those produced by a domestic source and of domestic origin. 

Section 8046 prohibits funding from being used to purchase 

supercomputers which are not manufactured in the United States. 

Section 8047 prohibits funding made available in this or any 

other Act from being used to pay the salary of anyone who ap-
299 

proves or implements a transfer of administrative responsibilities 

or budgetary resources of any program, project, or activity financed 

by this Act to the jurisdiction of another Federal agency not financed by this Act without express authorization of the Congress. 

Section 8048 provides for prior congressional notification of article or service transfers to international peacekeeping organizations. 

Section 8049 prohibits funding from being used for contractor bonuses being paid due to business restructuring. 

Section 8050 provides for the transfer of funds to appropriations 

available for pay of military personnel in connection with support 

and services for eligible organizations and activities outside the Department of Defense. 

Section 8051 provides for the Department of Defense to dispose 

of negative unliquidated or unexpended balances for expired or 

closed accounts. 

Section 8052 provides conditions for the use of equipment of the 

National Guard Distance Learning Project on a space-available, reimbursable basis. 

Section 8053 provides for the availability of funds to implement 

cost effective agreements for required heating facility modernization in the Kaiserslautern Military Community, Landstuhl Army 

Regional Medical Center, and Ramstein Air Base, Germany. 

Section 8054 provides for the limitation on the use of funds appropriated in title IV to procure end-items for delivery to military 

forces for operational training, operational use, or inventory requirements. 

Section 8055 provides for a waiver of "Buy America" provisions 

for certain cooperative programs. 

Section 8056 prohibits funding from being used to support the 

training of members of foreign security forces who have engaged in 

gross violations of human rights. 

Section 8057 prohibits funding in this Act from being used for repairs or maintenance to military family housing units. 

Section 8058 provides obligation authority for new starts for advanced concept technology demonstration projects only after notification to the congressional defense committees. 

Section 8059 provides that the Secretary of Defense shall provide 

a classified quarterly report on certain matters as directed in the 

classified annex accompanying this Act. 

Section 8060 prohibits the use of funds made available to the Department of Defense to provide support to an agency that is more 

than 90 days in arrears in making payments to the Department of 

Defense for goods or services provided on a reimbursable basis. 

Section 8061 provides for the use of National Guard personnel to 

support ground-based elements of the National Ballistic Missile Defense System. 

Section 8062 prohibits the use of funds made available in this 

Act to transfer to any nongovernmental entity ammunition held by 

the Department of Defense that has a center-fire cartridge and is 

designated as 4'armor piercing" except for demilitarization purposes. 

Section 8063 provides for a waiver by the Chief of the National 

Guard Bureau or his designee for all or part of consideration in 

cases of personal property leases of less than one year. 
300 

Section 8064 provides for a limitation on funding from being used 

to support non-appropriated funds that purchase alcoholic beverages. 

Section 8065 has been amended and provides for the transfer of 

funds made available in this Act under Operation and Maintenance, Army to other activities of the Federal Government for clas· 

sified purposes. 

Section 8066 has been amended and provides for the forced 

matching of disbursements and obligations made by the Depart· 

ment of Defense in the current fiscal year. 

Section 8067 provides for the transfer of funds made available in 

this Act under Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide to the 

Department of State Global Security Contingency Fund. 

Section 8068 provides grant authority for the construction and 

furnishing of additional Fisher Houses to meet the needs of military family members when confronted with the illness or hospitalization of an eligible military beneficiary. 

Section 8069 has been amended and provides funding and transfer authority for the Israeli Cooperative Programs. 

Section 8070 prohibits funding from being obligated to modify 

command and control relationships to give Fleet Forces Command 

operational and administrative control of Navy forces assigned to 

the Pacific Fleet or to give United States Transportation Command 

operational and administrative control of certain aircraft. 

Section 8071 has been amended and provides for the funding of 

prior year shipbuilding cost increases. 

Section 8072 has been amended and provides that funds made 

available in this Act for intelligence activities are deemed to be spe· 

cifically authorized by Congress for purposes of section 504 of the 

National Security Act of 1947 until the enactment of the Intelligence Authorization Act for the current fiscal year. 

Section 8073 prohibits funding from being used to initiate a new 

start program without prior written notification. 

Section 8074 has been amended and provides that the budget of 

the President for the subsequent fiscal year sh~ll include separate 

budget justification documents for costs of the United States Armed 

Forces' participation in contingency operations for the military personnel, operation and maintenance, and procurement accounts. 

Section 8075 prohibits funding from being used for the research, 

development, test, evaluation, procurement, or deployment of nuclear armed interceptors of a missile defense system. 

Section 8076 provides the Secretary of Defense with the authority to make grants in the amounts specified. 

Section 8077 prohibits funding from being used to reduce or disestablish the operation of the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron of tbe Air Force Reserve. 

Section 8078 prohibits funding from being used for the integration of foreign intelligence information unless the information has 

been lawfully collected and processed during conduct of authorized 

foreign intelligence activities. 

Section 8079 provides that at the time members of reserve components of the armed forces are called or ordered to active duty, 

each member shall be notified in writing of the expected period 

during which the member will be mobilized. 
301 

Section 8080 provides for the use of current and expired Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy subdivisions to reimburse the Judgment Fund. 

Section 8081 prohibits funding from being used to transfer program authority relating to current tactical unmanned aerial vehicles from the Army and requires the Army to retain responsibility 

for and operational control of the MQ-1C unmanned aerial vehicle. 

Section 8082 provides funding under certain conditions for the 

Asia Pacific Regional Initiative Program for the purpose of enabling 

the Pacific Command to execute certain Theater Security Cooperation activities. 

Section 8083 has been amended and limits the availability of 

funding provided for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence beyond the current fiscal year, except for funds appropriated for research and technology, which shall remain available 

for the current and the following fiscal years. 

Section 8084 provides for the adjustment of obligations within 

the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy appropriation. 

Section 8085 has been amended and provides for the establishment of a baseline for application of reprogramming and transfer 

authorities for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for 

the current fiscal year. 

Section 8086 is new and prohibits changes to the Array Contracting Command-New Jersey without prior notification. 

Section 8087 provides for the transfer of funds by the Director 

of National Intelligence to other departments and agencies for the 

purposes of Government-wide information sharing activities. 

Section 8088 provides for limitations on funding provided for the 

National Intelligence Program to be available for obligation or expenditure through a reprogramming or transfer of funds in accordance with section 102A(d) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 

u.s.c. 403-1(d)). 

Section 8089 directs the Director of National Intelligence to submit a future-years intelligence program reflecting estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations. 

Section 8090 defines the congressional intelligence committees as 

being the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

House of Representatives, the Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the Senate, and the Subcommittees on Defense of the Committees 

on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate. 

Section 8091 directs the Department of Defense to continue to report incremental contingency operations costs for Operation Enduring Freedom or any other named operations in the Central Command area of operation on a monthly basis in the Cost of War Execution Report as required by Department of Defense Financial 

Management Regulation. 

Section 8092 provides the authority to transfer funding from operation and maintenance accounts for the Army, Navy, and Air 

Force to the central fund for Fisher Houses and Suites. 

Section 8093 provides that funds appropriated in this Act may be 

available for the purpose of making remittances and transfers to 

the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 
302 

Section 8094 provides that any agency recmvmg funds made 

available in this Act shall post on a public website any report required to be submitted by Congress with certain exceptions. 

Section 8095 prohibits the use of funds for federal contracts in 

excess of $1,000,000 unless the contractor agrees not to require, as 

a condition of employment, that employees or independent contractors agree to resolve through arbitration any claim or tort related 

to, or arising out of, sexual assault or harassment, including assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false 

imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or retention, and to 

certify that each covered subcontractor agrees to do the same. 

Section 8096 has been amended and provides funds for transfer 

to the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund. 

Section 8097 prohibits the Office of the Director of National Intelligence from employing more Senior Executive employees than 

are specified in the classified annex. 

Section 8098 prohibits funding from being used to pay a retired 

general or flag officer to serve as a senior mentor advising the Department of Defense unless such retired officer files a Standard 

Form 278 or successor form. 

Section 8099 provides for the purchase of heavy and light armed 

vehicles for the physical security of personnel or for force protection 

purposes up to a limit of $250,000 per vehicle. 

Section 8100 has been amended and provides grants through the 

Office of Economic Adjustment to support critical existing and enduring military installation and missions on Guam, as well as any 

potential Department of Defense growth. 

Section 8101 prohibits the Secretary of Defense from taking beneficial occupancy of more than 3,000 parking spaces to be provided 

by the BRAC 133 project unless certain conditions are met. 

Section 8102 requires monthly reporting of the civilian personnel 

end strength by appropriation account to the congressional defense 

committees. 

Section 8103 has been amended and prohibits funding to separate, or to consolidate from within, the National Intelligence Program budget from the Department of Defense budget. 

Section 8104 has been amended and provides the Director of National Intelligence with general transfer authority with certain limitations. 

Section 8105 has been amended and provides $540,000,000 to remain available in the Ship Modernization, Operations, and 

Sustainment Fund until September 30, 2021 for the purpose of 

manning, operating, sustaining, equipping, and modernizing Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruisers. 

ttion 8106 reduces the total amount appropriated in this Act 

by 17,188,888 to reflect savmgs due to favorable exchange rates. 

Section 8107 prohibits funding to transfer or release any individual detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba into the United States, 

its territories, or possessions. This language is identical to language enacted in Public Law 112-74. 

Section 8108 prohibits funding to modify any United States facility (other than the facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba) to house any 
303 

individual detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This language is 

identical to language enacted in Public Law 112-74. 

Section 8109 prohibits funding from being used to enter into contracts or agreements with corporations with unpaid tax liabilities. 

Section 8110 prohibits funding from being used to enter into contracts or agreements with a corporation that was convicted of a federal criminal violation in the past 24 months. 

Section 8,111 prohibits funding from being used to violate the 

Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000. 

Section 8112 prohibits funding from being used to violate the 

Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008. 

Section 8113 prohibits funding from being used to violate the 

War Powers Resolution Act. 

Section 8114 prohibits funds from being used to purchase or 

lease new light duty vehicles except in accordance with the Presidential Memorandum-Federal Fleet Performance. 

Section 8115 prohibits funds from being used to enter into a contract with a person or entity listed in the Excluded Parties List 

System/System for Award Management as having been convicted of 

fraud against the Federal Government. 

Section 8116 prohibits funds from being used to enter into a contract, memorandum of understanding, or cooperative agreement 

with, make a grant to, or provide a loan or loan guarantee to 

Rosoboronexport, except under certain conditions. 

Section 8117 prohibits the use of funds for the purchase of manufacture of a United States flag unless such flags are treated as covered items under section 2533a(b) of title 10, United States Code. 

Section 8118 has been amended and provides for the transfer of 

funds for purposes of high priority sexual assault prevention and 

response program requirements. 

Section 8119 prohibits the use of funds for certain activities in 

Afghanistan. 

Section 8120 provides that funds may be used to provide ex 

gratia payments to local military commanders for damage, personal 

injury, or death that is incident to combat operations in a foreign 

country. 

Section 8121 has been amended and prohibits the use of funds 

to conduct any environmental study related to Minuteman III silos. 

Section 8122 prohibits the use of funds to cancel the avionics 

modernization program of record for C-130 aircraft. 

Section 8123 has been amended and prohibits the use of funding 

to reduce the force structure at Lajes Field, Azores, Portugal. 

Section 8124 prohibits the use of operation and maintenance 

funds in contradiction to 49 U.S. Code Section 41106 pertaining to 

the Civil Reserve Air Fleet. 

Section 8125 prohibits the use of funds for flight demonstration 

teams outside of the United States. 

Section 8126 prohibits the use of funds providing certain missile 

defense information to the Russian Federation. 

Section 8127 prohibits the use of funds by the National Security 

Agency targeting American persons under authorities granted in 

the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. 
304 

Section 8128 is new and provides for the transfer of funds to the 

Maritime Administration for expenses related to the Ready Reserve 

Force. 

Section 8129 is new and provides for the transfer of up to 

$1,000,000 to the John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and Development Trust Fund. 

Section 8130 is new and provides $533,500,000 to fully fund an 

increase in basic pay for all military personnel by 1.8 percent as 

authorized by current law. 

Section 8131 is new and provides $244,700,000 for basic allowance for housing for military personnel. 

Section 8132 is new and prohibits the use of funds to reduce, convert, decommission, or otherwise move to nondeployed status any 

Minuteman III ballistic missile silo that contains a deployed missile. 

Section 8133 is new and prohibits the use of funds to divest E3 airborne warning and control system aircraft. 

Section 8134 is new and prohibits the use of funds to implement 

the Arms Trade Treaty until ratified by the Senate. 

Section 8135 is new and provides $139,000,000 to construct, renovate, repair, or expand elementary and secondary public schools 

on military installations. 

Section 8136 is new and prohibits the transfer of certain helicopters from the Army National Guard to the regular Army. 

Section 8137 is new and provides $1,000,000,000 for military 

readiness. 

Section 8138 is new and limits the availability of funds for activities authorized under Section 1208 of Public Law 112-81. 

Se-chon ~13q 1s new und proh1b 1ts +he use 

t

funds In con+ro.venhon of-6ec. 1035 #1~ Nahont:tl Derens~ thd-itlorJ1:4ho r1 Ac+--

-(1' sea.-/ Vj eav ?..ol'l. 

3ectJOt1 ~11-Jo 1s n€w anJpruh1 btts h1e liSe 

offunds.r-u 1W7plemei1f-cr7anql'stv ha1r . 

Stalloard:>.· and CfYOCl'liliJ·'J poldtPJ fgrfema.le Stn:o: 1\\f HIVe IS. 
TITLE IX 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 

In title IX, the Committee recommends total new appropriations 

of $79,445,000,000 as a placeholder for ongoing military operations 

in Afghanistan. Despite a recent announcement from the Administration regarding plans for an enduring military presence in Afghanistan, no Overseas Contingency Operations budget request has 

been submitted; therefore this level is subject to change. This new 

discretionary spending authority for the Department of Defense 

will provide the necessary resources for deployed servicemembers, 

including funding for personnel requirements, operational needs, 

new aircraft to replace combat losses, combat vehicle safety modifications, and maintenance of facilities and equipment. 

GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Title IX contains several general provisions, many of which extend or modify war-related authorities included in previous Acts. A 

brief description of the recommended provisions follows: 

Section 9001 provides that funds made available in this title are 

in addition to funds appropriated or otherwise made available for 

the Department of Defense for the current fiscal year. 

Section 9002 provides for general transfer authority within title 

IX. 

Section 9003 provides that supervision and administration costs 

associated with a construction project funded with appropriations 

available for operation and maintenance, the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund, or the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund may be 

obligated at the time a construction contract is awarded. 

Section 9004 provides for the procurement of passenger motor vehicles and heavy and light armored vehicles for use by military and 

civilian employees of the Department of Defense in the Central 

Command area of responsibility. 

Section 9005 has been amended and provides funding for the 

Commander's Emergency Response Program, with certain limitations. 

Section 9006 provides lift and sustainment resources to coalition 

forces supporting military and stability operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Section 9007 prohibits the establishment of permanent bases in 

Iraq or Afghanistan or United States control over Iraq oil resources. 

Section 9008 prohibits the use of funding in contravention of the 

United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. 

1305) 
306 

Section 9009 limits the obligation of funding for the Mghanistan 

Security Forces Fund until certain conditions have been met. 

Section 9010 provides for the purchase of items of a particular 

investment unit cost from funding made available for operation and 

maintenance. 

Section 9011 has been amended and provides funding for the operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq 

and security assistance teams. 

Section 9012 has been amended and restricts funds provided in 

operation and maintenance accounts for payments of Coalition Support Funds for reimbursement to the Government of Pakistan until 

certain conditions are met. 

Section 9013 prohibits the use of funds with respect to Syria in 

contravention of the War Powers Resolution. 

Section 9014 prohibits the use of funds in the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund for new construction projects. 

Sec,hon q 015 IS new OJid 11m1t5 the. obllqahon 

of fundtnq {vr CNtfs'(las Conhfl~u}q~ra.h011J 

1..mhl cer'fa1n condmons r1ove r5ten tne/:-. 
TITLE X 

Title X contains one new general provision. A brief description of 

the recommended provision follows: 

Section 10001 is new and provides that the amount by which 

new budget authority exceeds spending caps is $0. 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPORTING 

REQUIREMENTS 

The following items are included in accordance with various requirements of the Rules of the House of Representatives: 

CHANGES IN THE APPLICATION OF EXISTING LAW 

Pursuant to clause 3(1)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the following statements are submitted describing the effect of provisions in the accompanying bill which directly 

or indirectly change the application of existing law. 

Language is included in various parts of the bill to continue ongoing activities which require annual authorization or additional 

legislation, which to date has not been enacted. 

The bill includes a number of provisions which place limitations 

on the use of funds in the bill or change existing limitations and 

which might, under some circumstances, be construed as changing 

the application of law. 

The bill includes a number of provisions, which have been virtually unchanged for many years that are technically considered 

legislation. 

The bill provides that appropriations shall remain available for 

more than one year for some programs for which the basic authorizing legislation does not presently authorize each extended availability. 

In various places in the bill, the Committee has allocated funds 

within appropriation accounts in order to fund specific programs. 

Changes in the application of existing law found within appropriations headings: 

Language is included in various accounts placing a limitation on 

funds for emergencies and extraordinary expenses. 

Language is included that provides not more than $15,000,000 

for the Combatant Commander Initiative Fund. 

Language is included that provides not more than $36,000,000 

for emergencies and extraordinary expenses. 

Language is included that provides not less than $36,262,000 for 

the Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program, of which not less than $3,600,000 shall be available for centers. 

(307) 
308 

Language is included that makes available $8,881,000 for certain 

classified activities, allows such funds to be transferred between 

certain accounts, and exempts such funds from the investment item 

unit cost of items ceiling. 

Language is included that provides that any transfer authority 

provided under the heading "Operation and Maintenance, DefenseWide" shall be in addition to any other transfer authority provided 

in this Act. 

Language is included under the various Environmental Restoration accounts that provides that the Service Secretaries may transfer such funds for the purposes of the funds provided under such 

appropriations headings, and provides that such transfer authority 

shall be in addition to any other transfer authority provided in the 

Act. 

Language is included that provides for specific construction, acquisition, or conversion of vessels under the heading 1

'Shipbuilding 

and Conversion, Navy". 

Language is included under the heading "Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy" that provides funds for certain 

activities. 

Language is included under the heading "Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide" that provides 

$250,000,000 for the Defense Rapid Innovation Program and provides for the transfer of funds subject to certain requirements. 

Language is included that provides that not less than $8,000,000 

of funds provided under "Defense Health Program" shall be available for HIV/AIDS prevention education activities. 

Language is included that provides for the carry-over of one percent of the Operation and Maintenance account under the "Defense 

Health Program". 

Language is included that limits obligation of funds provided 

under the "Defense Health Program" that limits the obligation of 

funds provided for the Interagency Program Management Office, 

the Defense Healthcare Management Systems Modernization program, and the Defense Medical Information Exchange until submission and approval of an expenditure plan describing certain 

matters. 

Language is included that specifies the use of certain funds provided under "Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction". 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds 

under "Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities". Such transfer authority shall be in addition to other transfer authority provialed elsewhere in the Act. 

Language is included that makes funds available for certain purposes notwithstanding any other provision of law, under "Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund", 

Language is included under "Joint Improvised Explosive Device 

Defeat Fund" that provides for the transfer of such funds for the 

purposes of such fund to other appropriations accounts, provides 

that such transfer authority shall be in addition to any other transfer authority provided in the Act, and requires prior notification of 

such transfers. 

Language is included under "Support for International Sporting 

Competitions" providing for purposes of such funds. 
309 

Language is included that provides that no funds made available 

in this Act may be used for publicity or propaganda purposes not 

authorized by Congress. 

Language is included that provides for conditions and limitations 

on the payment of compensation to, or employment of, foreign nationals. 

Language is included that provides that no funds made available 

in this Act may be obligated beyond the end of the fiscal year unless express provision for a greater period of availability is provided 

elsewhere in this Act. 

Language is included that provides a 20 percent limitation on the 

obligation of funds provided in this Act during the last two months 

of the fiscal year with certain exceptions. 

Language is included that provides for general transfer authority. 

Language is included that provides for incorporation of project 

level tables. 

Language is included that provides for the establishment of a 

baseline for application of reprogramming and transfer authorities 

for fiscal year 2015 and prohibits certain reprogrammings until 

after submission of a report. 

Language is included that provides for limitations on the use and 

transfer authority of working capital fund cash balances. 

Language is included that provides that prohibits funds appropriated in this Act to initiate a special access program without 

prior notification to the congressional defense committees. 

Language is included that provides limitations and conditions on 

the use of funds made available in this Act to initiate multi-year 

contracts. 

Language is included that provides for the use and obligation of 

funds for humanitarian and civic assistance costs under Chapter 20 

of title 10, United States Code. 

Language is included that provides that civilian personnel of the 

Department may not be managed on the basis of end strength or 

be subject to end strength limitations, sets forth certain requirements related to end strength for the budget submission, and requires that Department of Army Science and Technology be managed based on budget availability. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used to influence congressional action on any matters pending before the Congress. 

Language is included that prohibits compensation from being 

paid to any member of the Army who is participating as a full-time 

student and who receives benefits from the Education Benefits 

Fund when time spent as a full-time student is counted toward 

that member's service commitment. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds appropriated in title III of this Act for the Department of Defense 

Pilot Mentor-Protege Program. 

Language is included that provides for the Department of Defense to purchase anchor and mooring chains manufactured only in 

the United States. 
310 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available to the 

Department of Defense from being used to demilitarize or dispose 

of surplus firearms. 

Language is included that provides a limitation on funds being 

used for the relocation of any Department of Defense entity into or 

within the National Capital Region. 

Language is included that provides for incentive payments authorized by section 504 of the Indian Financing Act of 197 4 (25 

u.s.c. 1544). 

Language is included that provides that no funds made available 

in this Act for the Defense Media Activity may be used for national 

or international political or psychological activities. 

Language is included that provides for the obligation of funds for 

purposes specified in section 2350j(c) of title 10, United States 

Code. 

Language is included that provides funding for the Civil Air Patrol Corporation. 

Language is included that provides for the number of staff years 

of technical effort that may be funded for defense Federally Funded 

Research and Development Centers. 

Language is included that provides for the Department of Defense to procure carbon, alloy, or armor steel plate melted and 

rolled only in the United States and Canada. 

Language is included that defines congressional defense committees as being the Armed Services Committees and the Subcommittees on Defense of the Committees on Appropriations of the House 

and Senate. 

Language is included that provides for competitions between private firms and Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Activities for modification, depot maintenance, and repair of aircraft, vehicles, and vessels, as well as the production of components and 

other Defense-related articles. 

Language is included that provides for revocation of blanket 

waivers of the Buy America Act upon a finding that a country has 

violated a reciprocal trade agreement by discriminating against 

products produced in the United States that are covered by the 

agreement. 

Language is included that provides for the availability of funds 

for purposes specified in section 292l(c)(2) of the 1991 National Defense Authorization Act, namely facility maintenance and repair 

and environmental restoration at military installations in the 

United States. 

Language is included that provides for the conveyance, without 

consideration, of relocatable housing units located at Grand Forks, 

Malmstrom, Mountain Home, Ellsworth, and Minot Air Force 

Bases to Indian Tribes that are excess to Air Force needs. 

Language is included that provides authority to use operation 

and maintenance appropriations to purchase items having an investment item unit cost of not more than $250,000. 

Language is included that prohibits the purchase of specified investment items within Working Capital Fund. 

Language is included that provides that none of the funds appropriated for the Central Intelligence Agency shall remain available 

for obligation beyond the current fiscal year except for funds appro-
311 

priated for the Reserve for Contingencies, the Working Capital 

Fund, or other certain programs authorized under section 503 of 

the National Security Act. 

Language is included that provides that funds available for the 

Defense Intelligence Agency may be used for intelligence communications and intelligence information systems for the Services, the 

Unified and Specified Commands, and the component commends. 

Language is included that provides that not less than 

$12,000,000 within "Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide" 

shall be for mitigation of environmental impacts on Indian lands. 

Language is included that provides for the Department of Defense to comply with the Buy American Act (chapter 83 of title 41, 

United States Code). 

Language is included that provides conditions under which contracts for studies, analyses, or consulting services may be entered 

into without competition on the basis of an unsolicited proposal. 

Language is included that provides for the limitations of funds 

made available in this Act to establish Field Operating Agencies. 

Language is included that provides grant authorities for the Department of Defense acting through the Office of Economic Adjustment. 

Language is included that provides for the limitations on the conversion of an activity or function of the Department of Defense to 

contractor performance. 

Language is included that provides for the rescission of previously appropriated funds. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used to reduce authorized positions for military 

technicians (dual status) of the Army National Guard, Air National 

Guard, Army Reserve, and Air Force Reserve unless such reductions are a direct result of a reduction in military force structure. 

Language is included that provides that none of the funds made 

available in this Act may be obligated or expended for assistance 

to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea unless appropriated 

for that purpose. 

Language is included that provides for reimbursement to the National Guard and reserve when members of the National Guard 

and reserve provide intelligence or counterintelligence support to 

the Combatant Commands, Defense Agencies, and Joint Intelligence Activities. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used to reduce civilian medical and medical support 

personnel assigned to military treatment facilities below the September 30, 2003, level unless the Service Surgeons General certify 

to the congressional defense committees that it is a responsible 

stewardship of resources to do so. 

Language is included that provides that Defense and Central Intelligence Agencies' drug interdiction and counter-drug activity 

funds may not be transferred to other agencies unless specifically 

provided in an appropriations law. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds appropriated by this Act for the procurement of ball and roller bearings 

other than those produced by a domestic source and of domestic origin. 
312 

Language is included that provides for the Department of Defense to purchase supercomputers manufactured only in the United 

States unless the Secretary certifies such acquisition must be made 

for national security purposes. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this or any other Act to transfer administrative responsibilities or budgetary resources of any program, project, or activity financed by this Act to the jurisdiction of another Federal agency not 

financed by this Act without expressed authorization of the Congress. 

Language is included that provides for prior congressional notification of article transfers to international peacekeeping organizations. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act for contractor bonuses from being paid due to business restructuring. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds to 

be used to support personnel supporting approved non-traditional 

defense activities. 

Language is included that provides for the Department of Defense to dispose of negative unliquidated or unexpended balances 

for expired or closed accounts. 

Language is included that provides conditions for the use of 

equipment of the National Guard Distance Learning Project on a 

space-available, reimbursable basis. 

Language is included that provides for the availability of funds 

provided by this Act to implement cost-effective agreements for required heating facility modernization in the Kaiserslautern Military Community, Germany. 

Language is included that provides for the limitation on the use 

of funds appropriated in title IV to procure end-items for delivery 

to military forces for operational training, operational use, or inventory requirements. 

Language is included that provides for a waiver of the "Buy 

America" provisions for certain cooperative programs. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act to support the training of members of foreign security forces who have engaged in gross violations of human rights. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act for repairs or maintenance to military family housing units. 

Language is included that provides obligation authority for new 

starts for advanced concept technology demonstration projects only 

after notification to the congressional defense committees. 

Language is included that provides that the Secretary of Defense 

shall provide a classified quarterly report on certain matters as directed in the classified annex accompanying this Act. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available to the Department of Defense to provide support to an agency 

that is more than 90 days in arrears in making payments to the 

Department of Defense for goods or services provided on a reimbursable basis. 
313 

Language is included that provides for the use of National Guard 

personnel to support ground-based elements of the National Ballistic Missile Defense System. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act to transfer to any nongovernmental entity ammunition held by the Department of Defense that has a center-fire cartridge and designated as '

4

armor piercing" except for demilitarization purposes. 

Language is included that provides for a waiver by the Chief, National Guard Bureau or his designee for all or part of consideration 

in cases of personal property leases of less than one year. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used to purchase alcoholic beverages. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds 

made available in this Act under "Operation and Maintenance, 

Army" to other activities of the Federal Government for classified 

purposes. 

Language is included that provides for the forced matching of 

disbursement and obligations made by the Department of Defense 

in fiscal year 2015. 

Language is included that provides a limitation of $200,000,000 

for transfer to the Department of State Global Security Contingency Fund, and set forth certain reporting requirements prior to 

such transfer. 

Language is included that provides grant authority for the construction and furnishing of additional Fisher Houses to meet the 

needs of military family members when confronted with the illness 

or hospitalization of an eligible military beneficiary. 

Language is included that provides funding and transfer authority for the Israeli Cooperative missile defense programs. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act to be obligated to modifY the command and control 

relationship to give the Fleet Forces Command administration and 

operations control of U.S. Naval Forces assigned to the Pacific 

Fleet. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds to 

properly complete prior year shipbuilding programs. 

Language is included that provides that funds made available in 

this Act are deemed to be specifically authorized by Congress for 

purposes of section 504 of the National Security Act of 1947 until 

enactment of the authorization Act. 

Language is included that prohibits the use of funds made available in this Act to initiate a new start program without prior written notification. 

Language is included that provides that the budget of the President for fiscal year 2015 shall include separate budget justification 

documents for costs of the United States Armed Forces' participation in contingency operations that contain certain budget exhibits 

as defined in the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used for the research, development, test, evaluation, 

procurement, or deployment of nuclear armed interceptors of a missile defense system. 
314 

Language is included that provides the Secretary of Defense dis· 

cretionary authority to make grants to the United Service Organizations and the Red Cross if he determines it to be in the national 

interest. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used to reduce or disestablish the operation of the 

53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron of the Air Force Reserve. 

Language is included that prohibits funds made available in this 

Act from being used for the integration of foreign intelligence information unless the information has been lawfully collected and processed during conduct of authorized foreign intelligence activities. 

Language is included that provides that at the time members of 

reserve components of the Armed Forces are called or ordered to 

active duty, each member shall be notified in writing of the expected period during which the member will be mobilized. 

Language is included that provides that the Secretary of Defense 

may transfer funds from any available Department of the Navy appropriation to any available Navy ship construction appropriation 

to liquidate costs caused by rate adjustments or other economic factors. 

Language is included that provides for the use of current and expired "Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy" subdivisions to reimburse the Judgment Fund. 

Language is included that prohibits the transfer of program authorities related to tactical unmanned aerial vehicles from the 

Army. 

Language is included that provides funding and authority for the 

Asia Pacific Regional Initiative program. 

Language is included that limits the obligation authority of funds 

provided for the Director of National Intelligence to the current fiscal year except for research and technology which shall remain 

available for the current and the following fiscal years. 

Language is included that provides for the adjustment of obligations within the "Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy" appropriation. 

Language is included that prohibits transfers of funds until the 

Director of National Intelligence submits a baseline for application 

of reprogramming and transfer authorities. 

Language is included that prohibits the realignment or personnel 

reductions for certain Army command sites within prior notification 

to the congressional defense committees. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of up to 

$20,000,000 of funds available for the Program Manager for Information Sharing Environment to be transferred to other departments and agencies for certain purposes. 

Language is included that sets forth reprogramming and transfer 

procedures for the National Intelligence Program. 

Language is included that provides that the Director of National 

Intelligence shall provide budget exhibits identifYing the five year 

future-years intelligence program. 

Language is included that defines the congressional intelligence 

committees. 

Language is included that directs the Department of Defense to 

report on the Cost of War Execution Report on a monthly basis. 
315 

Language is included that provides that funds from certain operation and maintenance accounts may be transferred to a central 

fund established pursuant to section 2493(d) of title 10, United 

States Code. 

Language is included that provides that funds may be used for 

the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 

Language is included that provides that agencies post congressionally directed reports on a public website. 

Language is included that provides limitations on the award of 

contracts to contractors that require mandatory arbitration for certain claims as a condition of employment or a contractual relationship. The Secretary is authorized to waive the applicability of these 

limitations for national security interests. 

Language is included that provides funds and transfer authority 

for the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Mfairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund. 

Language is included that provides a limitation on the number 

of senior executives employed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 

Language is included that provides a limitation on certain senior 

mentors unless such mentors make certain financial disclosures. 

Language is included that provides authority to purchase heavy 

and light armored vehicles notwithstanding price or other limitations on the purchase of passenger carrying vehicles. 

Language is included that provides availability of funds appropriated under "Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide" for activities related to the military buildup of Guam. 

Language is included that places limitations on the number of 

parking spaces provided by the BRAC 133 project, with certain 

waiver authorities. 

Language is included that requires the Secretary of Defense to 

provide quarterly reports on civilian personnel end strength. 

Language is included the places limitations on the use of funds 

to make certain modifications to the appropriations account structure or the allotment, obligation and disbursement processes. 

Language is included that provides transfer authority for the Director of National Intelligence for the National Intelligence Program. 

Language is included that provides funds and transfer authority 

for the purpose of manning, operating, sustaining, equipping, and 

modernizing certain guided missile cruisers subject to certain requirements. 

Language is included that prohibits funds to transfer or release 

certain individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba into the 

United States, its territories, or possessions. 

Language is included that prohibits funds to construct, acquire, 

or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or pos· 

sessions to house individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Language is included that places limitations on the provision of 

funds to any corporation with an unpaid Federal tax liability. 

Language is included that places limitations on the provision of 

funds to any corporation convicted of a felony criminal violation 

within the preceding 24 months. 
316 

Language is included that prohibits the Department of Defense 

from entering into certain agreements with Rosoboronexport with 

certain waiver authorities. 

Language is included that prohibits the purchase or manufacture 

of a United States flag uncles such flag is treated as a covered item 

under section 2533a(b). 

Language is included that provides funds and transfer authority 

to the Services to support high priority Sexual Assault Prevention 

and Response Program requirements and activities. 

Language is included that provides for the payment of ex gratia 

payments in certain circumstances subject to certain conditions. 

Language is included that limits force structure changes at Lajes 

Field, Azores, Portugal except in accordance with section 1048 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. 

Language is included that provides for the transfer of funds to 

the Ready Reserve Force for expenses related to the National Defense Reserve Fleet. 

Language is included that provides funds for transfer to the John 

C. Stennis Center for Public Service Development Trust Fund. 

Language is included that provides an additional appropriation 

and transfer authority for pay for military personnel. 

Language is included that provides for an additional appropriation and transfer authority for basic allowance for housing for military personnel. 

Language is included that sets forth certain reporting requirements related to airborne warning and control. 

Language is included that provides an additional appropriation 

and transfer authority for construction, renovation, repair, and expansion of public schools on military installations. 

Language is included that provides an additional appropriation 

and transfer authority for military readiness improvements. 

Language is included that requires certain notification on funds 

provided under section 1208 authorities, with a waiver for exigent 

circumstances. 

Language is included that requires the Chiefs of National Guard 

and Reserve components to submit the modernization priority assessment for their respective components to the congressional defense committees. 

Language is included that provides that funds made available in 

title IX are in addition to amounts appropriated or otherwise made 

available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015. 

Language is included that provides for transfer authority between appropriations made available in title IX. 

Language is included that provides for supervision and administration costs associated with overseas contingency operations. 

Language is included that provides authority to purchase passenger, heavy, and light armored vehicles notwithstanding price or 

other limitations on the purchase of passenger carrying vehicles for 

use in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. 

Language is included that provides funds and authority for the 

Commander's Emergency Response Program and establishes certain reporting requirements. 

Language is included that authorizes the use of funds to provide 

certain assistance to coalition forces supporting military and sta-
317 

bility operations in Afghanistan and establishes certain reporting 

requirements. 

Language is included that places limitations on the use of Afghanistan Security Forces Funds and requires certain certifications. 

Language is included that authorizes funds in title IX for the 

:purchase of items having an investment unit cost of up to 

$250,000, subject to certain conditions. 

Language is included that authorizes up to $150,000,000 under 

the heading "Operation and Maintenance" for the Office of Security 

Cooperation in Iraq and security assistance teams, and operations 

and activities authorized in the fiscal year 2015 National Defense 

Authorization, subject to written notice requirements. 

Language is included that provides for the rescission of previously appropriated funds. 

Language is included that places limitations on the use of Coalition Support Funds for the Government of Pakistan. 

l o.n3~Aa5e 1 s 1nc\\Jaed +ha.+ proh ,b 1+s the. use 

of ~nds opprapr1a.ff'd b~+t!IS Act 111 

Contravenhon of Sec. Jo35 of the Ncxhonal 

'Defense A-u+hontanofl tki- for frsrc.ti ~ear .to/4, 

~ant.ua.1t 1s 1nclud fd t-haf- proh1 bd-s the 

use o fd..nd5 h ,mpltrl'lenr~ cha-n5es t7l ha1r 

stan ands Qnd jfilt7wliV1J po/JC!f.J ftrr f(?tr7a!e 

sernc e m'lmbers. 

t-anquaJf; 16 mc/ud£d tha+-/ttrll+s the 

obltqa'47on of fw"tdmg frrr overseas ContJnJentlj 

~(a.hons unhl cer+-aJn rondthons ha 1e been tnef, 
318 

APPROPRIATIONS NOT AUTHORlZED BY LAW 

Purwanl to clouoe llll(1)"' rule XIII al 11>o Ruin or,,... House 01 Repr""e"'"''V<I•. tr.e folawlng ll~lflllllollle 

OPP"'"""'"''" '" INt occam~nyiog !Jil ""'""'oro nol oultJOOHO Dy IIW 

DFPARTMEIH OF DEFENSE 

M~!a"l' ?eraoonel. Army 

~jrll'l' ..... 0 ..... ~. '11..-y. 

Mi1llry l'<lr~<>MI1. Wl'll>ll Corpo 

MIIIIJory P..,.onntr~. p,,. force 

Ro"'""'e Peroonnol, Amll 

Ro......,Pe~l NOV)' 

Re......,. Persomal. Mattne Ccrpo 

Rn"""I'<I"I<!IVIei,IWFcrc8 

NIIIOI'IOI 0-o Plo<'$()jl~, ii""V 

No~anol G<*<! Perooef'\ei.l'l< FO<Ce 

Ooenoloon om Malnl""""""' ~tmy 

0--'"" ond """•nlllnon"". NIY}' 

Ol>O'I'olti<!O' and M•·o>~e<~once. Monr~e Corpo. 

o_.,~on ""d Moontenonce. A~ Force 

o-"'""" and MoiMIInon<:l!l. Deleo&&.~ .. 

Ollf;'II~Of'l lfld Moln!lnon<lll, Army R~e 

~~onW>CIMJitltentii(>!I,N&"l'Re.­

ep.raliOI'I- .,..,,.,,,,.,., Manoco ~'PI Ron""'• 

Op.ora!1on ,..,. MomM"""""· Air Foooe Rost<W 

Qpe"'l>on ond MoKIW.ItiOI "'"'Y N.OOOII Q.,.-.j 

o_.lio<> onG Moon-..once ""N1bCJII&j Gl>lrd 

u~~ S\JtM CW<t of AIPfl•lo l<>flho .o.rrn.<l faro .. 

En•......,....,llllol Romra~l)ll . .um1 

~"""'"""""'blll'losto<oi•M Na~ 

~n•>ranmenbol l'lnlonlian. ~~~Force 

En•iron- Rn.,..lion, D"'*" ... W>do 

En•irotll'l>""'tal I!UIO<Jt.,n. Former1y U!utd OSI_,M SMI 

O.o.-u• Humani!llrlln. ~..,, ond C•V•< Aid 

lr'iotilo "'"""""'""''·lonny P.-.:>OJ•e""'"' o1 w .. pon, ond Troc:lu!ocl Ccmr.ar verucle'l. 

-· Procurement ol Ammon~Jon . .o.mty 

Orner Prt>Curlmtnt. Arm~ 

Alroru Proo:uremem. ~a.-y 

w .... ~,,. P""'ureme-nt. N1vy 

Sl'l>l)ttuii•:!Lng arod C""vo.-t>n Noory 

DLnot Procure, om. 'lew 

"""'=""'"''nl. ~oriM' C"'~' 

Ai«;to~ PR>C\Jromont, Air Foret 

r.l•nilrt Pfo<;utll'ltent AttF(I(ca 

"""'"'"""'"' OIM>muMIOO. Air Forw ... 

Other P~monl, "'" farce 

Procuromonl, Doorwn••·WMI. 

R-<eh, O...lllopm..,t. r.,,, ""a Entuo1•0tl. Arm, R""''""· Oeololopm..,:, rnt end ~••klahOtl. tltvv 

AMelfCil. Oev~onl, Tulond e .. ~ua~on, ~~~ F<>roo 

"'-"""· O..,lllo""""'l. Tul an~ hoh.ootlan, CoolonM· ~~ 

0PM01100ol TO!ollrod Evoluollon. O.lonu 

DolenM Worl<"'{{ Cop;tol Fu!\d~ 

~lllionol 01r1er>oe SNI<fl Fund 

Defo""" Healll'l Program .. 

Cl'lf."""'" Agents am:l Murt11ions DNituctiOII. O.lenloO. 

DruQ lnl$rdio;tion oro! C<lun1Dr-Or1>11 II<:IMiou, O..nM. 

Ja"" tmpt<>¥1$Cd E"')o066>>e O.W~ Dol- Fu"d 

Olfico ol u.. rnspKIO< G-rel C....lrollnr.J;vot'IC!I Agency Reti~•nt•ncl 0 o.e..,.,. Sytlem Furo:! 

lntrllogor>eoCor<vnui'Wiylo4oni<Q-I/lctounl 

Tille IX.· Q........,o ~lo)ornettto IA<I Olhfll Allb'i!!Oel 

N•iiontl G..otd .,.; ~eoe,.... !'.quoprerrt 

[In ltoc!uun ... cf "GIItnj 

~ .. lao! vur or AuthoriDt!On in lnty- of •pproprll\lofla <Dmporod to com,.rtd to 

outhatlulk>n Lo .. l o..Chor\lodon In tlllo blll1011 201t 2011 

2014 (I) 

2tl14 f1) 

"1014 (1) 

1014 (1) 

2014 (I) 

"1014 (I) 

2014 (') 

zo,. ('] 2C14 (I] 

:;!(114 (1) 

2014 JHIP?1 

2014 40,404!.00~ 

201-i 8.3BU5Q 

2014 31.S<I0,2e1 

l014 l2,1M,412 

2014 1.207,2311 

2014 1,21l.5~2 

2o14 2eM17 

2014 3,1611.117 

i1014 7.10C,()89 

2014 B.5~,l04 

2014 IJ.Il«< 

2011 ne.&, 2014 ,,6.103 

)'(114 43S.e20 

2014 1D,~H 

<"014 217.44] 

2014 106759 

2014 519.1'11 

2014 5.026.~<6 

2014 I,J3-&.oa3 

2014 U02.Ue 

2014 1.455.6)7 

;!014 5.410,918 

2014 1r.an,1o3 

1014 3.110,143 

!CU S!l9.li7 

2014 14.734.03~ 

2o14 e.:i.'i:i1.<52 

2014 1.32UOl 

2011 11.nue1 2014 S,34J,<fl6 

20<4 ,,._ .. 2 

2014 t$.7U.B43 

2011 4.US.301 

2014 7,$54.132 

2014 15,661.621 

2011 2S.71e,e.oa 

2011 18_218,2&4 

2014 186.300 

?014 1.4H.~IQ 

2D14 618,5~ 

2014 32.931l.52f 

2014 1,057,123 

1011 !13a.~5 

2014 0 

2011 :we.ooo 

2014 N/A 

2014 NIA 

2011 aa n;,TBII 

;1014 <tQO,OOO 

40,1101,9111 

27,67,,!55 

12.U6,857 

2UU.96J 

• te3.$<~ 

t.a1$.S~ 

666.~911 

1JH.57i 

7,ij~,551 

3.1:)(1,181 

J$18V~& 

10,127.•02 

G,2116,757 

J7.4J6.701 

R30Ueli 

1,1"11,151 

1,21)0,]83 

2e6.561 

3.1~&.046 

7,102.113 

M75.&111 

13.606 

1ill,815 

316,103 

439.820 

·~.757 

262,443 

109,500 

528,455 

5.2315,!~3 

1.628.083 

1.54~.-

1.4e&,D37 

~.~67,751 

17.CIIVS4 

l,C17 11<08 

11i,OD0704 

U24Q24 

1,271 311 

1Q,IM.606 

6.2&7. llg 

7U ..... l 

1._7;\,4~7 

•.s:n.g~ 

7.K1,4e& 

15.:16S.JSi 

14.847,354 

11.685.538: 

~~.800 

1,MS.e27 

~ll6,700 

3~.57J.511:2 

1.057.123 

1.007.?62 

3<17,000 

514,000 

552.5J5 

85.766.9-lt 

1,500,000 

41.183,729 41i3.716 274,810 

27.:!87.34• ~11.411 ·U4.211 

11,785.431 124.•32 ·41,426 

27.~,3152 ·569.747 ·61&.801 

4,30•1.159 ·1526114 ·179.111<0 

1.8315.024 ·15.6!14 -39.51:1 

659.214 7.363 -8.275 

1.652.14.8 -91,017 ·D3,4l1 

7 ~ 632 -.44-4,145 ·31l,~315 

3_\1011117 ..&7.•28 -19,774 

32,871,!1e0 -3_750,158 -2.511.61$ 

3U7J.Ii4l ·Vall.11l0 ·1.05U59 

s,ge.o,880 -9C.n7 ·JH.on 

JS,Ql4 1eo --33<1,U5 -2 . .r4.~1 

30.196.741 -8&4,072 -UI).I.Il« 

2.S3-6.6~ .fil,IH -8SM45 

1.011.821 ·2 ..... 620 ·IU,468 

270.48-6 -$,6$2 3.112-4 

~~lril.~14 -372.$27 -I~UJ~ 

~.116,:)07 -1.~71.42• ·1165,8011 

6.19J.w1g -214.1107 -2n.CI8o 

13.723 2Cl7 117 

2<11,S.SO -13<1,)(11 -~7.255 

277.291 -~3.300 .:sa 801 

408.716 ·120.547 ·11104 

B,!-47 -2,681 -2210 

2ll,l53 -4, Ito ·;xi 090 

•oa.ooo ·S,H9 ~.60~ 

3e~.IQ8 ·1~,003 ·163.3-17 

5,29~.~57 .S1W,l~l 59.30<1 

1,217,•6) -39Uil6 -~IC.aotl 

1,101.736 -180.1170 11111,116 

1,01' 477 -685.291 -.45ol,l60 

~.812,23<1 -1.615.811 ·U5~.511 

H.Mo4,5;13 -3.483,801 ·3.0]8.261 

).11l.nl lD.!III S.U65 

82U12 ·41.17'1 85,268 

1U5e,l61 -~711,765 ·7 ..... 343 

~ Dn.l79 -!40,&12 -901.445 

927,232 -~~4,841 ·:W4.0T$ 

12,1)1e.9<11 712,042 1 186.336 

4,548,211 -to2.;1s -no.~oe 

... •. too <D.0041 ·D&-:142 

1&8ll.G:rl 441 ·1!6.474 

• 3~8.121 -71.214 ·U14.aew 

6720.000 ·1.61J.05~ ·1.241,4!!6 

15,817,770 ·1.109,ii& !011,41& 

2J .• l6,DI< ·1 678,110 ·1.&01.372 

11,C1T,WOO -2,02<,482 ·601.838 

248.231 U,D~ U:!O 

1.3)0.48C -181,T18 -2;1.35e 

0 -584-.636 -595,700 

3U34.&70 •1,227,3114 ·1,918.712 

ua.ue -472.t1! -ne.2s5 9 .... ,U7 ·1S8.678 -G3.075 

6U64 ·IJI.gso 65.4&<~ 

31<.830 ·38,491 -35,1711 

514,000 0 

SQ1,194 ·10.2U -81,3<11 

79.«5.000 -o.7&3906 ·8,323.$-lll 

2,000.000 iOO.OQC 

11 TM H 2014 ,\lol>onol o.lonH 1\ulltori:tal<>n ilrl J•ll'>ottzo• $1~.393.131.000 !of m1ltlar"V peroonnel 

H.....,- Tne bol "'ckrQeo..,.•1101 """"''""' Gilv""" ""'"'n m•~ or""'""' t>e II>&Clf•"lljy outhor"o:od111 '*'"· 
319 

TRANSFER OF FUNDS 

Pursuant to clause 3(1)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the following is submitted describing the transfer of funds provided in the accompanying bill. 

Language has been included under "Operation and Maintenance, 

Defense-Wide" which provides for the transfer of funds for certain 

classified activities. 

Language has been included under "Environmental Restoration, 

Army" which provides for the transfer of funds for environmental 

restoration, reduction and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of 

unsafe buildings and debris, or for similar purposes. 

Language has been included under "Environmental Restoration, 

Navy" which provides for the transfer of funds for environmental 

restoration, reduction and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of 

unsafe buildings and debris, or for similar purposes. 

Language has been included under "Environmental Restoration, 

Air Force" which provides for the transfer of funds for environmental restoration, reduction and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings and debris, or for similar purposes. 

Language has been included under "Environmental Restoration, 

Defense-Wide" which provides for the transfer of funds for environmental restoration, reduction and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings and debris, or for similar purposes. 

Language has been included under "Environmental Restoration, 

Formerly Used Defense Sites" which provides for the transfer of 

funds for environmental restoration, reduction and recycling of hazardous waste, removal of unsafe buildings and debris, or for similar 

purposes. 

Language has been included under "Research, Development, Test 

and Evaluation, Defense Wide" which provides for the transfer of 

funds for the Defense Rapid Innovation Program to appropriations 

for research, development, test and evaluation for specific purposes. 

Language has been included under "Drug Interdiction and 

Counter-Drug Activities, Defense" which provides for the transfer 

of funds to appropriations available to the Department of Defense 

for military personnel of the reserve components; for operation and 

maintenance; for procurement; and for research, development, test 

and evaluation for drug interdiction and counter-drug activities of 

the Department of Defense. 

Language has been included under "Joint Improvised Explosive 

Devise Defeat Fund" which provides for the transfer of funds to appropriations available to the Department of Defense for military 

personnel; for operation and maintenance; for procurement; for research, development, test and evaluation; and for defense working 

capital funds for purposes related to assisting United States forces 

in the defeat of improvised explosive devices. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8005" which provides for the transfer of working capital funds to 

other appropriations accounts of the Department of Defense for 

military functions. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8008" which provides for the transfer of funds between working 

capital funds and the "Foreigu Currency Fluctuations, Defense" ap-
320 

propriation and the "Operation and Maintenance" appropriation accounts. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8015" which provides for the transfer of funds from the Department of Defense Pilot Mentor-Protege Program to any other appropriation for the purposes of implementing a Mentor-Protege Program development assistance agreement. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8050" which provides for the transfer of funds from "Operation and 

Maintenance, Defense-Wide" to appropriations available for the pay 

of military personnel in connection with support and services of eligible organizations and activities outside the Department of Defense. 

Language has been included under >~General Provisions, Sec. 

8065" which provides for the transfer of funds from "Operation and 

Maintenance, Army" to other activities of the federal government. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8067" which provides for the transfer of funds available under "Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide'' to the Department of 

State "Global Security Contingency Fund". 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8069" which provides for the transfer of funds from "Procurement, 

Defense-Wide" and "Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, 

Defense-Wide" for the Israeli Cooperative Programs. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8071" which provides for the transfer of funds under the heading 

"Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy" to fund prior year shipbuilding cost increases. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8087" which provides for the transfer of funds appropriated in the 

Intelligence Community Management Account for the Program 

Manager for the Information Sharing Environment to other departments and agencies for the purposes of Government-wide information sharing activities. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8092" which provides for the transfer of funds from "Operation and 

Maintenance, Army", "Operation and Maintenance, Navy", and 

"Operation and Maintenance, Air Force" to the central fund established for Fisher Houses and Suites. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8093" which provides that funds appropriated by this Act may be 

made available for the purpose of making remittances to the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8096" which provides for the transfer of funds appropriated for operation and maintenance for the Defense Health Program to the 

Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs 

Medical Facility Demonstration Fund. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8104" which provides for the transfer of funds for the National Intelligence Program. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8105" which provides for the transfer of funds from the "Ship Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund" to appropriations 
321 

for military personnel; operations and maintenance; research, development, test and evaluation; and procurement only for certain 

purposes. 

Language has been included under uGeneral Provisions, Sec. 

8118" which provides for the transfer of funds from the Department of Defense to the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force, 

including Reserve and National Guard, to support high priority 

Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program requirements 

and activities. 

Language has been included under ''General Provisions, Sec. 

8128" which provides for the transfer of funds from "Operations 

and Maintenance, Navy" to the Ready Reserve Force, Maritime Ad· 

ministration account of the Department of Transportation for the 

expenses related to the National Defense Reserve Fleet. 

Language has been included under uGeneral Provisions, Sec. 

8129" which provides for the transfer of funds to the John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Development Trust Fund. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8130" which provides for the transfer of funds for pay for military 

personnel for purposes of fully funding the authorized military pay 

raise. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8131" which provides for the transfer of funds for basic allowance 

for housing for military personnel. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8135" which provides for the transfer of funds from "Operation and 

Maintenance, Defense-Wide" for transfer to the Secretary of Education to construct, renovate, repair, or expand elementary and secondary public schools on military installations. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

8137" which provides for the transfer of funds to the operation and 

maintenance accounts of the Army, Navy, Marine, and Air Force, 

including National Guard and reserve, for purposes of improving 

military readiness. 

Language has been included under title IX "Other Appropriations" which provides for the transfer of funds to Defense Health 

Program, Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund, Office of the Inspector General, and Defense Working Capital Fund. 

Language has been included under "General Provisions, Sec. 

9002" which provides for the authority to transfer funds between 

the appropriations or funds made available to the Department of 

Defense in title IX, subject to certain conditions. 

RESCISSIONS 

Pursuant to clause 3(!)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the following table is submitted describing the 

rescissions recommended in the accompanying bill: 

Aircraft Procurement Army. 201312015 

Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Arm~. 2013/2015 

Other Procurement, Army. 2013/2015 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy, 2013/2015 .. 

Weapons Procurement, Navy, 2013/2015 . 

Aircraft Procurement, A1r Force. 2013/2015 . 

$27,000,000 

5,000,000 

30,000,000 

47,200,000 

27.000,000 

71,100,000 
Mrss1le Procurement. An Force, 201312015 . 

Other Procurement. Army, 201412016. 

AiiCiaft Procurement. Navy, 201412016 .. 

Weapons Procurement. NaV')', 201412016 

Other Procurement. Nai/J', 201412016 .. 

i\1rcraft Procurement Air Force, 201412016 

Missile Procurement, Air Force. 201412016 . 

322 

Research, Development. Test and Evaluation, Army, 2014/2015 .. 

Research. Development. Test and Evaluation, Navy, 201412015 .. 

TRANSFER OF UNEXPENDED BALANCES 

13.800.000 

200,000,000 

171,622,000 

91,436.000 

1.505,000 

47,400,000 

121,185.000 

5,000.000 

105,400,000 

Pursuant to clause 3(1)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the bill contains a general provision which allows for the transfer of unexpended balances from the Operation 

and Maintenance and Military Personnel accounts to the "Foreign 

Currency Fluctuation, Defense" account to address shortfalls due to 

foreign currency fluctuation. 

DIRECTED RULE MAKING 

This bill does not contain any provision that specifically directs 

the promulgation or completion of a rule. 

PROGRAM DUPLICATION 

No provision of this bill establishes or reauthorizes a program of 

the Federal Government known to be duplicative of another Federal program, a program that was included in any report from the 

Government Accountability Office to Congress pursuant to section 

21 of Public Law 111-139, or a program related to a program identified in the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. 

STATEMENT OF GENERAL PERFORMANCE GOALS AND 

OBJECTIVES 

Pursuant to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the following is a statement of general performance goals and objectives for which this measure authorizes funding: 

The Committee on Appropriations considers program performance, including a program's success in developing and attaining 

outcome-related goals and objectives, in developing funding recommendations. 

COMPLIANCE WITH RULE Xlii, CL. 3(e) (RAMSEYER RULE) 

In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, the Committee notes that the accompanying bill does not propose to repeal or amend a statute or part 

thereof. 

EARMARK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Neither the bill nor the report contains any congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in 

Clause 9 of Rule XXI. 
323 

COMPARISON WITH THE BUDGET RESOLUTION 

Clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires an explanation of compliance with section 

308(a)(l)(A) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 

Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-344), as amended, which requires that 

the report accompanying a bill providing new budget authority contain a statement detailing how that authority compares with the 

reports submitted under section 302 of the Act for the most recently agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget for the fiscal 

year from the Committee's section 302(a) allocation. This information follows: ~ t ~ 

~[I~li~SE~ft~TMT~.~~tB~J------------~~( 32~ FIVE-YEAR OUTLAY PROJECTIONS 

In compliance with section 308(a)(l)(B) of the Congressional 

Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-

344), as amended, the following table contains five-year projections 

associated with the budget authority provided in the accompanying 

bill. 

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL 

GOVERNMENTS 

,..FULL 001•IP•H1YFEil 7f;l~E5 

II 

GsQrt 324- 3~ 

I 

~rt3Z3D-i) 

1 tJ S~/2..1" ADDtn~~ t. 1J1 Ew5 

.s 3l-... 3'-11 
(ID 

Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations 

to its subcommittees: Subcommittee on Defense 

Discretionary: 

General Purpose .................................................... . 

Overseas Contingency Operations 2/ .................... . 

Mandatory ................................................................... . 

1/ Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority. 

21 Overseas Contingency Operations/Global War on 

Terrorism 

------=-::-::-c::-:--:-:-:---:-:----'-[ l_n_m_illions of d:.=o.:::lla:::rs.::.JL--=-,---,=----

302(b) Allocation This Bill 

Budget Authority Outlays Budget Authority Outlays 

490,944 

79,445 

514 

522,774 

36,839 

514 

490,944 

79,445 

514 

1/ 522,774 

36,839 

514 
[In millions of dollars] 

Projection of outlays associated with the recommendation: 

2015 ............................................................. . 

2016 ............................................................. . 

2017 ............................................................. . 

2018 ............................................................. . 

2019 and future years .................................. . 

1/ Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority. 

Note: OCO is Overseas Contingency 

Operations/Global War on Terrorism 

Non-OCO 

1/ 319,129 

99,964 

36,482 

17,621 

13,352 

1/ 

oco 

36,839 

25,039 

I 0,096 

3,983 

2,416 
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 

In accordance with section 308(a)(l)(C) of the Congressional Budget and 

Impoundment Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-344), as amended, no new budget or 

outlays are provided by the accompanying bill for financial assistance to State and 

local governments. 
FULL COMMITTEE VOTES 

Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule Xlll of the House of Representatives, the results of 

each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to report, together with the names of those voting for and 

those voting against, are printed below: 

ROLL CALL NO. I 

Date: June I 0, 2014 

Measure: Defense Appropriations-Bill, FY 2015 

Motion by: Mr. Frelinghuysen 

Description of Motion: To prohibit funds from being used in contravention of Section 1035 of the Fiscal Year 

2014 National Defense Authorization Act, with associated report language, and withholding 85 percent of 

Overseas Contingency Operations funds until the Secretary provides a detailed spend plan for those funds, 

including the assurance that no funds will be used in contravention of Section I 035 of the Fiscal year 2014 

National Defense Authorization Act. 

Results: Adopted 33yeas to 13 nays 

Members Voting Yea 

Mr. Aderholt 

Mr. Amodei 

Mr. Calvert 

Mr. Carter 

Mr. Cole 

Mr. Crenshaw 

Mr. Cuellar 

Mr. Dent 

Mr. Diaz-Balart 

Mr. Fleischmann 

Mr. Fortenberry 

Mr. Frelinghuysen 

Ms. Granger 

Mr. Graves 

Dr. Harris 

Ms. Herrera Beutler 

Mr. Joyce 

Ms. Kaptur 

Mr. Kingston 

Mr. Latham 

Mrs. Lowey 

Mr. Owens 

Mrs. Roby 

Mr. Rogers 

Mr. Rooney 

Mr. Ryan 

Mr. Simpson 

Mr. Stewart 

Mr. Valadao 

Mr. Visclosky 

Mr. Wolf 

Mr. Womack 

Mr. Yoder 

Members Voting Nay 

Ms. DeLaura 

Mr. Farr 

Mr. Fattah 

Mr. Honda 

Ms. Lee 

Ms. McCollum 

Mr. Pastor 

Ms. Pingree 

Mr. Price 

Mr. Quigley 

Ms. Roybal-Allard 

Mr. Schiff 

Ms. Wasserman Schultz 
FULL COMMITTEE VOTES 

Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule X Ill of the House of Representatives, the results of 

each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to report, together with the names of those voting for and 

those voting against, are printed below: 

ROLL CALL NO. 2 

Date: June 10,2014 

Measure: Defense Appropriations Bill, FY 2015 

Motion by: Ms. Lee 

Description of Motion: To prohibit funds from being obligated or expended pursuant to the Authorization of 

Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of2002. 

Results: Defeated 17 yeas to 31 nays. 

Members Voting Yea 

Ms. DeLaura 

Mr. Farr 

Mr. Fallah 

Mr. Honda 

Ms. Kaptur 

Ms. Lee 

Mrs. Lowey 

Ms. McCollum 

Mr. Pastor 

Ms. Pingree 

Mr. Price 

Mr. Quigley 

Ms. Roybal-Allard 

Mr. Ryan 

Mr. Schiff 

Mr. Visclosky 

Ms. Wasserman Schultz 

Members Voting Nay 

Mr. Aderholt 

Mr. Amodei 

Mr. Bishop 

Mr. Calvert 

Mr. Carter 

Mr. Cole 

Mr. Crenshaw 

Mr. Cuellar 

Mr. Culberson 

Mr. Dent 

Mr. Diaz-Balart 

Mr. Fleischmann 

Mr. Fortenberry 

Mr. Frelinghuysen 

Ms. Granger 

Mr. Graves 

Dr. Harris 

Ms. Herrera Beutler 

Mr. Joyce 

Mr. Kingston 

Mr. Latham 

Mr. Owens 

Mrs. Roby 

Mr. Rogers 

Mr. Rooney 

Mr. Simpson 

Mr. Stewart 

Mr. Valadao 

Mr. Wolf 

Mr. Womack 

Mr. Yoder 
FULL COMMITTEE VOTES 

Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the House of Representatives, the results of 

each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to report, together with the names of those voting for and 

those voting against, are printed below: 

ROLL CALL NO. 3 

Date: June 10,2014 

Measure: Defense Appropriations Bill, FY 20 I 5 

Motion by: Ms. Lee 

Description of Motion: To require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National 

Intelligence, to submit a classified report, with an unclassified summary, no later than 180 days after 

enactment, and every I 80 days thereafter, on each activity that is being carried out pursuant to the 

Authorization for Use of Military Force. 

Results: Defeated 2 I yeas to 27 nays 

Members Voting Yea 

Mr. Cuellar 

Ms. DeLaura 

Mr. Farr 

Mr. Fattah 

Mr. Fortenberry 

Ms. Herrera Beutler 

Mr. Honda 

Ms. Kaptur 

Ms. Lee 

Mrs. Lowey 

Ms. McCollum 

Mr. Pastor 

Ms. Pingree 

Mr. Price 

Mr. Quigley 

Mr. Rooney 

Ms. Roybal-Allard 

Mr. Ryan 

Mr. Schiff 

Mr. Visclosky 

Ms. Wasserman Schultz 

Members Voting Nay 

Mr. Aderholt 

Mr. Amodei 

Mr. Bishop 

Mr. Calvert 

Mr. Carter 

Mr. Cole 

Mr. Crenshaw 

Mr. Culberson 

Mr. Dent 

Mr. Diaz-Balart 

Mr. Fleischmann 

Mr. Frelinghuysen 

Ms. Granger 

Mr. Graves 

Dr. Harris 

Mr. Joyce 

Mr. Kingston 

Mr. Latham 

Mr. Owens 

Mrs. Roby 

Mr. Rogers 

Mr. Simpson 

Mr. Stewart 

Mr. Valadao 

Mr. Wolf 

Mr. Womack 

Mr. Yoder 
. ,__ COMPARATIVE STATE~E·l~OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS 

...,, (Amounts in Thousands) 

'~ ·,~ 

TITLE I 

MILITARY PERSONNEL 

M1litary Personnel, Ar•y .. . 

Military Personnel, Navy ............. . 

Military Personnel, Marine Corps .. . 

Military Personnel, Air foTce ....•...... 

Reserve Personnel, Army ........... . 

Reserve Personnel, Navy .............. , .. , .•. 

Reserve Personnel. ~arine Corps, .... . 

Reserve Personnel, Air Force ...... . 

National Guard Personnel, Army,,.,, .. 

National Guard Personnel, Air Force .. 

Total, Title I, 

Operation 

Operation 

P'IAINTENANC£ 

AnayNa~vy. · · 

"· 

!i 

.\;. f;tj 

,jq~ :,; .... :)~ ~~ .,_,. -~ 

7' ~ !;P •-;;/ ~ c j);;: t<;j• 

&~ 

0 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

128,796,287 

FY 2015 

Request 

128,957,593 

:=:~::~======= :============= 

30.768,069 

36,311,160 

33,240,148 

39,316,857 

41 '183, 729 

27,387,344 

12,785,431 

27,564,362 

4,304, 15'3 

1 ,.836,024 

659' 224 

1 ,652,148 

7,644,632 

.110,587 

32,671.980 

39,073,543 

Bi 11 vs. 

Enacted 

+-395, 762 

+-155,832 

+-19,332 

-955,631 

-73,404 

-7,942 

+-4, 115 

-71.011 

·131,868 

-3,834 

·668,647 

8111 vs. 

Request 

-41,610 

-102,096 

-133,672 

-251 ,584 

-154,971 

-27.010 

_, 1,530 

-23,370 

·38,280 

-45,870 

-829,953 

-568,168 

-243,314 

"' "' .... 

• 
·--~ 

',~ 

~ 

~STATE,ENT COI'IFARATI ~- OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS 

(Amount~ in Thousands) 

Operation and Haintenance, ttar"ine Corps. 

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force .. ,, .. 

Operatlon and flaintenance, Defense-Wide ........ 

Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve. ..... Operation and naintenance, Na~y Reserve. ····· Operation and Haintenance, l'larine Corps Reserve. 

Operation and "aintenance, Air Force Reser~e ... 

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard. 

Operation and "aintenance. Air National Guard .. 

Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Account ... 

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed For 

Environmental Restoration, Arny ....... , .... Environmental Restoration. Navy ... .... Environmental Restoration, Air force. ............ Environmental Restoration, Defense-W · ..... 

Environmental Restoration, Forner Sites ... 

Overseas ~umanitarian, Oisaste ...... 

Cooperative Threat Reduct1o ........ .. ... Department of Defense Ac Workforce 

De~elopment Fund. ..... 

and maintenance ..... 

FV 2014 

Enacted 

--- 13,606 

298,815 

316,103 

439,820 

10,757 

2R7 ,443 

109,500 

500,455 

51,031 

,909,487 

35,331,193 

31,198,232 

2,490,569 

1,007' 100 

266,582 

3,015,842 

6.030,773 

6,392,859 

5,000 

,723 

20 ' 0 

277,29 

408,716 

8.547 

208,353 

100,000 

365' 106 

212,875 

Bill 

5,984,680 

35,024,160 

30,896,741 

2,535,606 

1,011,627 

270,485 

2,989,214 

6,116,307 

6,393,919 

---

51,875 

-------------- -----·------·- -------------- 159,869,726 166,002,818 164,631,638 

============== ======5~~s••~= ============== 

Bi 11 vs. 

Enacted 

+587,075 

+1,775,542 

-553,327 

-405,330 

-146,555 

+15,168 

-72,993 

·741.223 

+1 . 615 

---

+117 

-97,255 

-38,809 

-31 '104 

-2,210 

-54,090 

-6,500 

-135,347 

Bi 11 vs. 

Request 

+75' 193 

-307,033 

-301,491 

+45,037 

+4 '727 

.q '903 

-26,628 

""85,534 

+1 ,060 

-5,000 

+25,000 

-t-3,000 

-161,000 

------·------- -1,371,180 

"' "' "' 
TITLE III 

PROCUREMENT 

Aircraft Procurement, Armv. 

Missile Procure~ent, Ar~y. 

Procure.ent of Weapons and Tra~ked Combat Vehicles, 

Army... . .................. , . 

Procurement of A~~unitlon, Army. 

Other Procurement, Army. 

Aircraft Procure~ent, Navy. 

Weapons Procurement, Navy. 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps. 

Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy. 

Other ProcureNent, Navy .. , .•.•. ,.,. 

Procurement, Marine Corps .. 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ... ,. 

Hissne Pro~urement, Air Force ..... . 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force. 

Other Procuregent, Air Force ..... . 

Procurement, Defense-Wide ... . 

Defense Production Act Purchases 

Total, Tltle 

FOR 2014 A~D BUDGE1 REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOH~ENDED 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

FY 2015 

Request 

5,295,957 

1,217,483 

1.703.736 

1,011,477 

4,812,234 

14,054,523 

3,111,931 

629,372 

,256,361 

923.379 

232 

Bi 11 vs. 

Enacted 

+451,066 

·332,008 

+92 ,925 

-432,590 

-124,674 

-2,388,271 

+102,774 

+80,056 

-975,003 

•JSO, 761 

-313,726 

+1 ,667' 761 

+99,448 

-81 '477 

0,269 

' -··----------- ----···-······ -------------- ------------- 92,861,300 89,660,299 91,227,819 -1,633,481 

Bill vs. 

Request 

+193,272 

+200,000 

+232 '298 

·20,000 

·81,400 

+980,206 

-106,014 

·142,573 

-144,264 

-52,449 

-56,120 

+504,370 

-144,295 

-29,200 

+67,005 

+136,684 

+30,000 

"' "' "' 
-.""~ 

c ~~ 

OF NEW BUDGET ~UTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND A~OUNTS RECOMHENOEO lN THE BILL FOR 

TITLE IV 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPHENT, TEST ~NO EVALUATION 

Research, Cevelop•ent, Test and Evaluation, 

Research, DevelopNent, Test and 

Research. Development, Test and 

Research, DevelopMent, Test and 

Defense·Wide ..... 

Evaluation, 

Evaluation, 

Evaluation, 

~rmy,.,,.,. 

ilavy. 

Air Force. 

Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense, •... 

Total, T1t1e IV, Research, Develop~ent, Test and 

Evaluation ................................ . 

TITLE V 

REVOLVING AND HANAGEHENT FUNDS 

Defense Working Capital Funds 

National Defense Sealift Fund. 

Total, Title V, Revolving and 

(Amounts ln Thousands) 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

1,649,214 

597,213 

2,246,427 

FY 2015 

Request 

1.234,468 

1,23-4,468 

Bill 

1,334,468 

·406,318 

+927 ,851 

·'146,310 

·8,512 

+1,438 

+368,149 

Bill vs. 

Request 

+126, 102 

·388,565 

·300,910 

+311.816 

•ao.soo 

·171,057 

+100,000 

+100,000 

"' "' "" 
'""' 

TITLE Ill 

OTHE~ DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS 

Defense Health Progra~ 

Operation and maintenance. 

Procurement ........... - .. . Research, development, test and evaluation. 

Total, Defense Health Program 1/ ..... . 

Chemical Agents and "unitions Destruction, Defense: 

Operation and maintenance. 

Procurement. . . . . ........ . 

Research, development, test and evaluation. 

Total , Chemical Agents 2/ ... 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug 

Counter-narcotics support. 

Drug demand reduction program ... 

National Guard counter-drug 

Total, Counter-Drug 

FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BIL 

(Amounts in Tnou~ands) 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

FY 2015 

Request 

222.728 

10,227 

595.913 

-------------- -------------- 1,004,123 828,868 

1,015,885 

719,098 

101,591 

Enacted 

30,080,563 -624,432 

308,413 -133,351 

1,245,694 -306,505 

5111 YS. 

Reques,t 

-951 '348 

--- +591 '300 

-------------- -------····--· -------------- 31,634,870 -1,064,258 -360.048 

-175,844 

+8,859 

-6' 270 

------------- --------------

669,631 

10:5.591 

169,465 

··------------ -------------- -----········· ·············· 

1,015,885 820,657 944,687 -71' 198 

"' "' 00 
COMPARATIVE STATEnENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AI10UNTS RECOt111Et.IOED IN THE BILL FO_ 

Joint Improv1sed Explosive Devic~at Fund 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund:.~ 

Support for Internat1onal Sporting Co~pet 

Office of the Inspector General 11. 

Total, Title VI. Other Department 

Programs .......... , .. . 

TITLE VII 

RELATED AGENCIES 

Central Intelligence Agency Retire~ent and Disability 

Syste111 Fund ....•.•••••.•..................••.•.. 

Intelligence Co~~unity 11anagement Account (ICMA). 

Total, Title VII, Related agencies. 

TITLE VIII 

Additional transfer authori..u"l5ec.6005)., ... 

Indian Financing Ac::t in~ves {Sec.B019). 

FFRDC {Sec.B023). 

Rescissions (Sec. 

(Amounts 1n Thousands} 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

514,000 

528,229 

1,042,229 

(5,000,000) 

15.000 

·40,000 

-1,906,089 

FY 2015 

Request 

(5,000,000) 

-265,685 

+65,464 

+10,000 

•4,170 

Bill vs. 

Request 

-49,594 

-20,000 

33.795,719 -1,239,447 -305,642 

=~=~~:=~=~~~~: ============== ============== 

514,000 

501 '194 

(5,000,000) 

-40,000 

-964,648 

-27,035 -9.000 

-27,035 ·9,000 

"' "" tO 
-""--

~RATlVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 201~ AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND 

O&fl, Defense-wide tr~nsfer authorl~(Sec.B050) ..... 

Global Securit~ Contingency Fund (O&~fense-wide 

transfer) (Sec.8067) .......... . 

Fisher House Fou~dation (Sec.8068) .. 

National grants (Sec.8076). 

Shipbuilding & conversion funds, Navy 

ICMA transfer authority (Sec.8087) ... 

Fisher Hollse transfer authority (Sec. 8092) .. 

Defense Health O&M transfer authority (Sec.8096). 

Operation and Maintenance. Defense-Wide {Sec.8100) 

(transfer authon ty) .... 

Ship Modernization, Operations and 

Sustainment Fund (Sec.8105). 

Rescission. 

Superintendents review ..... , ...... . 

Revised econonmic assuMptions (Sec. 8106•-· 

Special Victi~s Program implenentation. 

General/Flag Officers .. 

Working Capital Fund excess cash 

National Defense Reserve Flee 

transfer authoritV) (Se 

John C. Stennis Center 

Development Fund (~ 

authority) (Sc~29) 

transfer 

Trillining and 

General Provisions .... 

(A3ounts in Thousands) 

FY 201-4 FY 2015 

Enacted Request 

(30.000) (30,000) 

(200,000) (200,000) 

4,000 4' 000 

--- 44' 000 

5,000 5' 000 

(:20,000) (20,000) 

(11 ,000) (11 .000) 

(146,857) (146,857) 

(80,596) (80,596) 

540,000 

a. oao 

-380,000 

1,000 

~ - ~547 ,100 

25,000 

-8.000 

-866,500 

{291,000) 

(1,000) (1 '000) 

···----------- ·-······-····· -------------· -2 '779' 189 -260.685 958,452 

============== ============== ============== 

Bi 11 vs. 

Enacted 

-3,000 

---

--- (+3, 770) 

(·38,804) 

-1,704,400 

... 1,920,000 

-1,000 

-167,100 

-25,000 

... a.ooo +866 '500 

(+291 ,000) 

~00) 

Bill vs. 

Request 

.. 4,000 

.. 44 ,000 

---

---

+540,000 

·547' 100 

--- ---------.-.-. 

"' "' 0 

~~-. 
TITLE IX 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (DCO) 31 

Military Personnel 

Military Pe:rsonnel, Anny (OCO)., .. 

Hi 1 itary Personnel, Navy (OCO). 

Mil'itary Personnel, !1arine Corps (OCO). 

Military Psrsonnel, A'ir Force (OCO). 

Reserve Personnel, Ar~~ (OCO), ... 

Reserve Personnel, Nav~ (OCO). 

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps (OCO). 

Reserve Personnel, ~ir Force (OCO). 

National Guard Personnel, Ar111y 1 .. 

National Guard Personnel, Air 

Mllitary Personnel (OCO). 

FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AI'IOUNTS REI 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

F'r' 2014 

Enacted 

832,862 

33,352 

20 '238 

15.134 

ZD ,432 

2.57,064 

6,919 

7,971,993 

Si 11 

5,100,000 

Bill vs. En<:~cted 

-5,449,726 

·558,344 

-777,922 

·832,862 

-33,352 

-20,238 

-15,134 

-20,432 

-257,064 

-6.919 

+-S,iOO,OOO 

Bill VS. 

Request 

+5' 100,000 

+5, 100,000 

"' "' >-' 

'- ~, 
r--

NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

Operation 

Operation & Maintenance, Ar11y (OCO) .. 

Operation & Ma1ntenance, Navv (OCD) •.••.. 

Operation & Maintenance, "arine Corps (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force (DCO) .•. 

Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide (OCO). 

Coalition support funds {OCO) .... , ....•. 

Operatic~ 8 Maintenance, Army Reserve (OCO). 

Operation & Ma1ntenance, Navy Reserve (OCO) .. 

Operation & Maintenance, Harine Corps Reserve (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, ArNy National Guard 

Operation & Halntenance, Air Nat1onal Guard 

Operation and Maintenance (OCO). 

Subtotal, Operation and 

Afghanistan 

Afghanistan 

Total, Maintenance .. , 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

63,471,402 

199,000 

4,726,720 

sa. 397,122 

FY 2015 

Request Bi 11 

58,675,000 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

-32,369,249 

-B,470,808 

-3,369,815 

-12,746,424 

-6,226,678 

(·1,257,000) 

-34,674 

-55' 700 

-12,534 

-32,849 

-130,471 

·22,200 

~58,675,000 

Bill VS. 

Request 

~58,675,000 

~58,675,000 

"' "' ., 

e" 
...... 

Procurement 

Aircraft Procurement, Army (OCO). 

M\sslle Procurement, Anny (OCO) ..... 

Procure~nt of A~munition, Army (OCO) ..... , .. 

Other Procurement, Ar~y (OCO).,. 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy (OCO). 

Weapons Procurement, Navy (OCO) .......... . 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps 

Procurement, Marine Corps (OCO).. .. .. . .. . 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force (OCO) .. ,, .. . 

Missile Procure~ent, Air Force (OCO). 

Procurement of A~unit1on, Air Force 

Other Procure~ent, Air Force (OCO) ... 

Procurement, Defense-Wide (OCO), 

National Guard and Reserve EQuiB 

Procurenent (OCO). 

Total, 

FOR 2014 ANO BUDGET REQUESTS 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

6,233,156 

B1ll 

12,220,000 

12,220,000 

Bill II'S, 

Enacted 

-669,000 

-128,645 

-190,900 

·653,902 

-211,176 

-86' 500 

-169,362 

-125,984 

-168,868 

-24,200 

-137,826 

-2,517,646 

_,28,947 

-1.000,000 

220,000 

Bill vs. Reqoest 

+12,220,000 

+12,220,000 

"' "' "' 

'-, 

·., 

., 
.. ., 

' 

COMPARATIVE STATEMEHT OF 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Ar~v 

(OCO) ..................................... . 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluatio~. Navy 

lOCO)... . .. .. .. .......... . 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, 

(OCO).. . . . . . . . ....... . 

Research, Develop~ent, Test 

Defense·Wide (OCO) .... 

Defense 

and 

Funds 

34, 

9,000 

78,208 

135,134 

264,910 

FY 2015 

Request Bill 

Bill vs. Enacted 

-13,500 

-34,426 

·9,000 

-78,208 

-135.134 

8111 vs. 

Request 

"' "' ,. 

-,_ 
,-. ~ ......... 

·,~ 

COHPAAA T IVE ~ENT OF NEW 

......... , 

BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AHOUNTS RECORHENDED IN THE 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

Nattonal Guard and Reserve Equip~~ent 

National Guard and Reserve Equipeent (OCO) .. 

Other Department of Defense Progra~s 

Defense Health PrograM: 

Operation and maintenance (OCO) .•.... 

Drug Interdictlon and Counter-Drug Activities. Oefense 

(OCO) ......... , .....................•.. Jofnt IED Defeat Fund (OCO) 21 .•.............•...• , .... , •. 

Off1ce of the Inspector General (OCO), ,, , ... Other (OCO),....... . .. , ••....•....... 

Total. Other Depart•ent of Defense 

TITLE IX General Provisions 

Additional transfer authority (OCO) 

Rescissions (OCO) (Sec.9013) .. 

Total. T1tle IX 

Net Grand Total . 

FY 201.q 

Enacted 

2.164.997 

(4,000,000) 

-140,370 

65,026,942 

FY 2015 

Request 

79,445,000 

., 

2,000,000 

79,445,000 

============== ============== ============== 565.093. 629 563,698,995 563.898.820 

8111 vs. 

Enacted 

~2.000,000 

-898,701 

-376,305 

-879,225 

-10,766 

+1 ,450,000 

-714,997 

==~~=~====~=== ============== ============== z:============ 

8111 vs. 

Request 

+2,000,000 

+1,450,000 

+1 ,450,000 

(+4,000,000) 

"' "' en 

""' ....... 
--

f 

STATEftENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 A~D BUDGET REQUESTS 

{Amounts in Thousands} 

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET 

Scorekeeping adjustments: 

lease of defense real property (perManent),.,. 

Disposal of defense real property (per~anent). 

OHP, 0&~ to DOD-VA Joint Incentive Fund: 

Defense function .. , .... . 

Non-defense function .... . 

DHP, 0&" to Jolnt DOD-VA Medical Facility 

Demonstration Fund: 

Defense function......... . ....... , ... . 

Non-defense funct1on.. . .... . 

O&H, Defense-wide transfer to 

Defense function. 

Non-defense function. 

Tricare accrual (permanent, indefi~e auth.) 41 . .. 

{OCO) 31 .... 

adjustments) ... 

Total discretionary .... 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

-50,000 

50,000 

7,258,000 

164,000 

7,462,000 

572' 555' 629 

(576,381,718) 

(-3,826,039) 

572,555,629 

FY 2015 

Request 

31,000 

8,000 

-15,000 

15,000 

31,000 

6,000 

-15,000 

15,000 

·146,857 

146.a57 

000 -30,000 

30~- 30,000 

6,963.000",._ 6,963,000 

.......... :::. ~-~ .... :::. 

7,002,000 

570,700.995 

(570,966,660) 

(-265,685) 

570,700,995 570,900.820 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

'+"1,000 

-2,000 

-3,770 

..-3,770 

'+"20,000 

-20.000 

·295,000 

-164,000 

-460.000 

Bill vs. 

Reque$t 

1"199,825 

(+896,788) 

==~:~~'·!!!~ ====~::!~;!::~ _, ,654, 1"199,825 

============= ============= 

..... 

"' "' "' 

' ""'~ ..,,,. 

-~-

~:. .. " 

""'-·· 
F NEW BUDGET AUTHORHY FOR 2014 ANO BUDGET REQUESTS AND 

Title I -Military Personnel ..... 

Title II ·Operation and Maintenance .. 

Title Ill - Procurement........... . ....... , . . .... . 

Title IV - Research, Oevelop~ent, Test and Evaluation .. 

Title V - Revolving and Management Funds .... Title VI -Other Department of Defense Programs. 

Title VII -Related Agencies ........... . 

Title VIII -General Provisions {net) .. . 

Title IX - Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) .. 

Total, Department of Defense .. 

Scorekeeping adjust~ents .. 

1/ Included in Budget under 0 ation and ~aintenance 

21 Included in Budget unde rocurement 

31 Global War on Terrori (GWOT) 41 Contr1butions to 0 rt~ent of Oefe~se Retiree 

725, P.l. 108-375) (CBO est) 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

565.093,629 

7,462,000 

572,555,629 570,700,995 

126,127,640 

164,631,638 

91,227,819 

63,362,890 

1,334,468 

33,795,719 

1 ,015,194 

958,452 

79,445,000 

Bi 11 vs. 

Enacted 

-668,647 

-t4, 761.912 

-1,633,481 

+368,149 

-911,959 

-1,239,447 

-27,035 

+3,737,641 

-5,581,942 

Bill vs. 

Request 

-829,953 

-1,371,180 

+1,567,520 

-171 ,057 

+100,000 

-305,642 

-9,000 

+1,219,137 

-------------- ---------·--·· .3.898,820 -1,194,809 +199,825 

,~2,000 -460,000 ------- ..... ·····--------- -------------- 570,900, -1,654,809 +199,825 

=~~~~======== ~============= ============== 

"· ... ~ 

~, 

..... ..,. ....._,, 

"" "" _, 

"""'"·· ' "'·· ""'"', -... "•''\-. 

--~ 

• 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

TITLE I 

MILITARY PERSONNEL 

Military Personnel, Army. 

Military Personnel, Navy. 

Military Personnel, Marine Corps. 

Military Personnel, Air Force .. 

Reserve Personnel, Army. 

Reserve Personnel, Navy. 

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps. 

Reserve Personnel, Air Force. 

National Guard Personnel, Army. 

National Guard Personnel, Air Force. 

Total, Title I, Military Personnel. 

TITLE II 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Operation and Maintenance, Army. 

Operation and Maintenance, Navy. 

GPO Oef hse_ba FY2014(report) .rpd.t. - Filters: I ,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

40,787,967 

27,231,512 

12,766,099 

28,519,993 

4,377,563 

1,843,966 

655,109 

1,723,159 

7,776,498 

3,114,421 

128 ,796 '287 

FY 2015 

Request 

41 ,225,339 

27,489,440 

12,919,103 

27,815,926 

4,459,130 

1,863,034 

670,754 

1,675,518 

7,682,892 

3,156,457 

128,957,593 

Bi 11 

41 '183, 729 

27,387,344 

12,785,431 

27,564,362 

4,304,159 

1,836,024 

659,224 

1,652,148 

7,644,632 

3,110,587 

128,127,640 

Bill liS. 

Enacted 

+395,762 

+155,832 

+19,332 

~955,631 

-73,404 

-7,942 

+4' 115 

-71 . 011 

-131,866 

-3,834 

-668,647 

Bi 11 liS. 

Request 

-41,610 

-102,096 

-133,672 

-251 '564 

-154 '971 

-27,010 

-11,530 

-23,370 

-38,260 

-45,870 

-829,953 

============== ============== ============== ============== ============== 

30,768,069 

36,311,160 

33,240,148 

39,316,857 

Defense 

32,671,980 

39,073,543 

+1 ,903.911 

+2,762,383 

6/11/2014 10:24 AM Page: 

-568,168 

-243,314 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps. 

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force 

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide 

Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve. 

Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve. 

Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve. 

Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve. 

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard. 

Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard. 

Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Account. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. 

Environmental Restoration, Army. 

Environmental Restoration, Navy. 

Environmental Restoration, Air Force .. 

Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide. 

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites .. 

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid. 

Cooperative Threat Reduction Account. 

Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce 

Development Fund. 

Total, Title II, Operation and maintenance .. 

GPO Oef hse_ba FY2014(report).rpd.t .. -Filters: I,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

5,397,605 

33,248,618 

31 ,450,068 

2,940,936 

1,158,382 

255,317 

3,062,207 

6,857,530 

6,392,304 

13,606 

298,815 

316,103 

439,820 

10,757 

287,443 

109,500 

500,455 

51' 031 

159,869,726 

FY 2015 

Request 

5,909,487 

35,331,193 

31,198,232 

2,490,569 

1.007,100 

268,582 

3,015,842 

6' 030 ,773 

6,392,859 

5,000 

13' 723 

201,560 

277' 294 

408,716 

8,547 

208,353 

100,000 

365,108 

212,875 

166,002,818 

Bill 

5,984,680 

35,024,160 

30,896,741 

2,535,606 

1,011,827 

270,485 

2,989,214 

6,116,307 

6,393,919 

13,723 

201,560 

277' 294 

408,716 

8,547 

233,353 

103,000 

365,108 

51,875 

164,631,638 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

+587,075 

+1 '775, 542 

-553,327 

-405,330 

-146,555 

+15, 168 

-72,993 

-741,223 

+1 ,615 

+117 

-97,255 

-38,809 

-31 '104 

-2,210 

-54,090 

-6,500 

-135,347 

+844 

+4,761,912 

Bill VS. 

Request 

+75,193 

-307,033 

-301,491 

+45,037 

+4 '727 

+1 ,903 

-26,628 

+85,534 

+1 ,060 

-5,000 

+25,000 

+3,000 

-161,000 

-1,371,180 

============== ============== ============== ============== ============== 

Defense 6/11/2014 10:24 AH Page: 2 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

TITLE II I 

PROCUREMENT 

Aircraft Procurement, Army. 

Missile Procurement, Army. 

Procurement of weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, 

Army. 

Procurement of Ammunition, Army. 

Other Procurement, Army. 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy. 

Weapons Procurement, Navy. 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps. 

Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy. 

Other Procurement, Navy. 

Procurement, Marine Corps. 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force. 

Missile Procurement, Air Force. 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force. 

Other Procurement, Air Force ..... . 

Procurement, Defense-Wide 

Defense Production Act Purchases 

Total, Title III, Procurement. 

GPO Def hse_ba FV2014(report).rpd.t. -Filters: I,O,G 

FV 2014 

Enacted 

4,844,891 

1 '549' 491 

1 '610 '811 

1,444,067 

4,936,908 

16,442,794 

3,009,157 

549,316 

15,231 ,364 

5,572,618 

1,240,958 

10,379,180 

4,446,763 

729,677 

16,572,754 

4,240,416 

60' 135 

FV 2015 

Request 

5,102,685 

1,017,483 

1,471,438 

1,031,477 

4,893,634 

13,074,317 

3,217,945 

771,945 

14,400,625 

5,975,828 

983,352 

11,542,571 

4,690,506 

677,400 

16,566,018 

4,221,437 

21,638 

Bi 11 

5,295,957 

1,217,483 

1,703,736 

1,011,477 

4,812,234 

14,054,523 

3,111,931 

629,372 

14,256,361 

5,923,379 

927' 232 

12,046,941 

4,546,211 

648,200 

16' 633' 023 

4,358,121 

51,638 

Bi 11 vs. 

Enacted 

+451,066 

-332,008 

+92,925 

-432,590 

-124,674 

-2,388,271 

+102,774 

+80,056 

-975,003 

+350,761 

-313,726 

+1,667,761 

+99,448 

-81,477 

+60, 269 

+117,705 

-8,497 

Bill vs. 

Request 

+193 1272 

+200,000 

+232,298 

-20,000 

-81,400 

+980,206 

-106,014 

-142,573 

-144,264 

-52,449 

-56,120 

+504,370 

-144,295 

-29,200 

+67,005 

+136,684 

+30,000 

-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 92,861,300 89,660,299 91,227,819 -1,633,481 +1,567,520 

Defense 6/11/2014 10:24 AM Page: 3 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts ln Thousands) 

TITLE IV 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army. 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy. 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force. 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, 

Defense Wide 

Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense. 

Total, Title IV, Research, Development, Test and 

Evaluation. 

TITLE V 

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS 

Defense Working Capital Funds. 

National Defense Sealift Fund. 

Total, Title V, Revolving and Management Funds. 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014(report).rpd.t. -Filters: I,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

7,126,318 

14,949,919 

23,585,292 

17,086,412 

246,800 

FY 2015 

Request 

6,593,898 

16,266,335 

23,739,892 

16,766,084 

167,738 

Bi 11 

6,720,000 

15,877,770 

23,438,982 

17' 077' 900 

248,238 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

-406,318 

+927,851 

-146,310 

-8,512 

+1,438 

Bill vs. 

Request 

+126,102 

-388,565 

-300,910 

-+-311 ,816 

+80,500 

-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------

62,994,741 63,533,947 63,362,890 +368,149 -171,057 

============== ============== ============== ============== ============== 

1,649,214 

597,213 

2,246,427 

1,234,468 

1,234,468 

Defense 

1,334,468 -314,746 +100,000 

-597,213 

1,334,468 -911,959 +100,000 

6/11/2014 10:24 AM Page: 4 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

TITLE VI 

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS 

Defense Health Program 

Operation and maintenance. 

Procurement. 

Research, development, test and evaluation. 

Total, Defense Health Program 1/. 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense: 

Operation and maintenance. 

Procurement .. 

Research, development, test and evaluation. 

Total, Chemical Agents 2/ .. 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense 

Counter-narcotics support. 

Drug demand reduction program. 

National Guard counter-drug program. 

Total, Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug 

Activities, Defense. 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014 (report) . rpd. t. - Fi 1 ters: I , 0, G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

30,704,995 

441 '764 

1,552,399 

FY 2015 

Request 

31,031 ,911 

308,413 

654,594 

Bill 

30,080,563 

308,413 

1,245,894 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

-624.432 

-133,351 

-306,505 

-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------

32' 699' 158 31,994,918 31,634,870 -1,064,288 

398 '572 222,728 2221728 -175,844 

1,368 10,227 10,227 +8,859 

604 '183 595,913 595,913 -8,270 

Bill vs. 

Request 

-951 '348 

+591 ,300 

-360,048 

-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- ---------- 1,004,123 828,868 828,868 -175,255 

1,015,885 --- --- -1,015,885 

719,096 669,631 +669,631 -49,465 

101 '591 105,591 +105,591 +4,000 

169,465 +169,465 +169,465 

-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------

1,015,885 820,687 944,687 -71,196 +124,000 

Defense 6/11/2014 10:24 AM Page: 5 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund. 

Support for International Sporting Competitions 1/. 

Office of the Inspector General 1/. 

Total, Title VI, Other Department of Defense 

Programs. 

TITLE VII 

RELATED AGENCIES 

Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability 

System Fund. 

Intelligence Community Management Account (ICHA). 

Total, Title VII, Related agencies. 

TITLE VIII 

GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Additional transfer authority (Sec.8005). 

Indian Financing Act incentives (Sec.8019}. 

FFRDC (Sec.8023). 

Rescissions (Sec.8039). 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014(report).rpd.t. -Filters: I,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

316,000 

35,035,166 

514' 000 

528,229 

1,042,229 

FY 2015 

Request 

115,058 

20,000 

10,000 

311,830 

34,101,361 

514,000 

510,194 

1,024,194 

Bi 11 

65,464 

1 0' 000 

311,830 

33,795,719 

514' 000 

501,194 

1 ,015,194 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

+65,464 

+10,000 

-4 '170 

-1,239,447 

-27,035 

-27,035 

Bill vs 

Request 

-49,594 

-20 000 

-305,642 

-9,000 

-9,000 

============== ============== ============== ============== ============== 

(5,000,000) 

15' 000 

-40,000 

-1,906,089 

(5,000,000) 

-265,685 

Defense 

(5,000,000) 

-15,000 

-40,000 -40,000 

-964,648 +941,441 -698,963 

6/11/2014 10:24 AM Page; 6 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

O&M, Defense-wide transfer authority (Sec.8050). 

Global Security Contingency Fund (O&H, Defense-wide 

transfer) (Sec.8067). 

Fisher House Foundation (Sec.8068). 

National grants (Sec.8076). 

Shipbuilding & conversion funds, NaYy (Sec.8080). 

ICMA transfer authority (Sec.8087) .. 

Fisher House transfer authority (Sec.8092). 

Defense Health O&H transfer authority (Sec.8096). 

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide (Sec.8100) 

(transfer authority). 

Ship Modernization, Operations and 

Sustainment Fund (Sec.8105). 

Rescission. 

Superintendents review 

Revised econonmic assumptions (Sec. 8106). 

Special Victims Program implementation .. 

General/Flag Officers. 

Working Capital Fund excess cash balances. 

National Defense Reserve Fleet (O&H, Navy 

transfer authority) (Sec 8128). 

John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and 

Development Fund (O&H, Navy transfer 

authority)(Sec.8129). 

Total, Title VIII, General Provisions. 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014(report) .rpd.t. -Filters: I,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

(30,000) 

(200,000) 

4,000 

44,000 

8,000 

(20,000) 

(11 '000) 

(143,087) 

(119,400) 

2,244,400 

-1,920,000 

1 '000 

-380,000 

25,000 

-8,000 

-866,500 

FY 2015 

Request 

(30,000) 

(200,000) 

---

--- 5,000 

(20,000) 

(11 ,000) 

(146,857) 

(80,596) 

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(291,000) 

(1 ,000) 

Bill 

(30,000) 

(200,000) 

4,000 

44,000 

5,000 

(20,000) 

(11 ,000) 

(146,857) 

(80, 596) 

540,000 

--- -545,100 

---

---

---

(291,000) 

(1. 000) 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

---

--- -3,000 

(+3,770) 

(-38,804) 

-1,704,400 

+1 ,920,000 

-1,000 

-165,100 

-25,000 

+8,000 

+866,500 

(+291 ,000) 

(+1,000) 

Bill vs. 

Request 

+4,000 

+44,000 

+540,000 

-545,100 

-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -2,779,189 -260,685 960,452 +3,739,641 +1,221,137 

============== ============== ============== ============== ============== 

Defense 6/11/2014 10:24 AM Page: 7 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

TITLE IX 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS {OCO) 3/ 

Military Personnel 

Military Personnel, Army (OCO). 

Military Personnel, Navy (OCO). 

Military Personnel, Marine Corps (OCO) .. 

Military Personnel, Air Force (OCO). 

Reserve Personnel, Army (OCO). 

Reserve Personnel , Navy (OCO). 

Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps (OCO) .. 

Reserve Personnel, Air Force (OCO). 

National Guard Personnel, Army (OCO) ........ . 

National Guard Personnel, Air Force (OCO). 

Military Personnel (OCO). 

Total, Military Personnel. 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014(report).rpd.t. -Filters: I,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

5,449,726 

558' 344 

777' 922 

832,862 

33,352 

20,238 

15' 134 

20.432 

257,064 

6,919 

7,971,993 

Defense 

FY 2015 

Request Bill 

5,100,000 

5,100,000 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

-5,449,726 

-558,344 

-777,922 

-832,862 

-33,352 

-20,238 

-15.134 

-20,432 

-257,064 

-6,919 

+5.100,000 

-2,871,993 

Bill vs. 

Request 

+5,100,000 

+5,100,000 

6/11/2014 10:24 AH Page: 8 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

Operation and Maintenance 

Operation & Maintenance, Army (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance. Marine Corps {OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance. Air Force (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide (OCO). 

Coalition support funds (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve {OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard (OCO). 

Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard (OCO). 

Operation and Maintenance (OCO). 

Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance. 

Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund (OCO). 

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (OCO). 

Total, Operation and Maintenance. 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014 (report) . rpd. t. - Fi 1 ters: I , 0, G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

32,369,249 

8,470,808 

3,369,815 

12,746,424 

6,226,678 

(1 ,257 ,000) 

34 '674 

55,700 

12,534 

32,849 

130,471 

22,200 

63,471,402 

199,000 

4,726,720 

66,397,122 

Defense 

FY 2015 

Request Bi 11 

58,675,000 

56,675,000 

56,675,000 

Bi 1l vs 

Enacted 

-32,369,249 

-8,470,808 

-3,369,815 

-12,746,424 

-6,226,678 

(-1 ,257,000) 

-34,674 

-55,700 

-12,534 

-32,849 

-130,471 

-22,200 

+58,675,000 

-4,796,402 

-199,000 

-4,726,720 

-9,722,122 

Bill vs. 

Request 

+56,675,000 

+56,675,000 

+58,675,000 

6!11!2014 10:24 AM Page: 9 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

Procurement 

Aircraft Procurement, Army (OCO). 

Missile Procurement, Army (OCO). 

Procurement of Ammunition, Army (OCO). 

Other Procurement, Army (OCO). 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy (OCO) 

Weapons Procurement, Navy (OCO). 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps (OCO). 

Procurement, Harine Corps (OCO). 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force (OCO). 

Missile Procurement, Air Force (OCO) .. Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force (OCO). 

Other Procurement, Air Force {OCO). 

Procurement, Defense-Wide (OCO). 

National Guard and Reserve Equipment (OCO) .. 

Procurement (OCO). 

Total, Procurement. 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014(report).rpd.t .. -Filters: I,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

669' 000 

128,645 

190,900 

653,902 

211 '176 

86,500 

169,362 

125,984 

188,868 

24,200 

137,826 

2,517,846 

128 '947 

1,000,000 

6' 233' 156 

Defense 

FY 2015 

Request Bill 

12,220,000 

12' 220' 000 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

-669,000 

-128,645 

-190,900 

-653,902 

-211,176 

-86,500 

-169,362 

-125,984 

-188,868 

-24,200 

-137,826 

-2,517,846 

-128,947 

-1,000,000 

+12,220,000 

+5,986,844 

Bill vs. 

Request 

+12,220,000 

+12,220,000 

6111/2014 10:24 AM Page: 10 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army 

(OCO). 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy 

(OCO). 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force 

(0~). 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, 

Defense-Wide (OCO). 

Total, Research, Development, Test and 

Evaluation. 

Revolving and Management Funds 

Defense Working Capital Funds (OCO) .. 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014(report).rpd.t. -Filters: I,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

13,500 

34.426 

9' 000 

78,208 

135' 134 

264,910 

Defense 

FY 2015 

Request Bi 11 

Bi 11 vs. 

Enacted 

-13,500 

-34,426 

-9,000 

-78,208 

-135,134 

-264,910 

6/11/2014 10:24 AM Page: 11 

Bill vs. Request 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

National Guard and Reserve Equipment 

National Guard and Reserve Equipment (OCO}. 

Other Department of Defense Programs 

Defense Health Program: 

Operation and maintenance {OCO}. 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense 

(OCO). 

Joint IED Defeat Fund (OCO) 2/. 

Office of the Inspector General (OCO}. 

Other (OCO). 

Total, Other Department of Defense Programs. 

TITLE IX General Provisions 

Additional transfer authority (OCO) (Sec.9002). 

Rescissions (OCO) (Sec.9013). 

Total, Title IX 

Net Grand Total . 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014(report).rpd.t. -Filters: I,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

898 '701 

376' 305 

879,225 

1 0 ,766 

2,164,997 

(4,000,000) 

-140,370 

85,026,942 

565,093,629 

FY 2015 

Request 

79,445,000 

563,698,995 

Defense 

Bi 11 

2,000,000 

1,450,000 

1,450,000 

(4,000,000) 

79,445,000 

563,900,820 

Bill vs 

Enacted 

+2,000,000 

-898,701 

-376,305 

-879,225 

-10,766 

+1 ,450,000 

-714,997 

+140,370 

-5,581,942 

-1,192,809 

Bill vs. 

Request 

+2,000,000 

+1,450,000 

+1,450,000 

(+4,000,000) 

+201,825 

6/11/2014 10:24 AM Page: 12 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET RECAP 

Scorekeeping adjustments: 

Lease of defense real property (permanent). 

Disposal of defense real property (permanent). 

DHP, O&M to DOD-VA Joint Incentive Fund: 

Defense function. 

Non-defense function. 

DHP, O&M to Joint DOD-VA Medical Facility 

Demonstration Fund: 

Defense function. 

Non-defense function. 

O&M, Defense-wide transfer to Department of State: 

Defense function. 

Non-defense function 

Tricare accrual (permanent, indefinite auth.) 4/. 

(OCO) 3/. 

Total, scorekeeping adjustments .. 

Adjusted total (includ. scorekeeping adjustments). 

Appropriations. 

Rescissions. 

Total mandatory and discretionary. 

GPO Def hse_ba FY2014(report).rpd.t. -Filters: I,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

30,000 

10,000 

-15,000 

15,000 

-143,087 

143,087 

-50' 000 

50,000 

7. 258' 000 

164,000 

7,462,000 

572,555.629 

(576,381 ,718) 

(-3,826,089) 

572,555,629 

FY 2015 

Request 

31,000 

8,000 

-15,000 

15,000 

-146,857 

146,857 

-30,000 

30,000 

6,963,000 

7,002,000 

570,700,995 

(570,966,680) 

(-265.685) 

570,700,995 

Defense 

Bill 

31,000 

8,000 

-15,000 

15,000 

-146,857 

146,857 

-30,000 

30,000 

6,963,000 

7,002,000 

570,902,820 

(571,867,468} 

(-964.648) 

570,902,820 

Bill vs. 

Enacted 

+1 ,000 

-2,000 

-3.770 

+3, 770 

+20,000 

-20,000 

-295,000 

-164,000 

-460,000 

-1,652,809 

(-4,514,250) 

(+2,861,441) 

-1,652,809 

Bill vs. 

Request 

+201 ,825 

(+900,768) 

(-698.963) 

+201,825 

6/11/2014 10:24 AM Page; 13 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR 2014 AND BUDGET REQUESTS AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR 2015 

(Amounts in Thousands) 

RECAPITULATION 

Title I - Military Personnel. 

Title II Operation and Maintenance. 

Title III - Procurement. 

Title IV - Research, Development, Test and Evaluation. 

Title V - Revolving and Management Funds. 

Title VI Other Department of Defense Programs. 

Title VII Related Agencies. 

Title VIII - General Provisions (net). 

Title IX - Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). 

Total, Department of Defense. 

Scorekeeping adjustments. 

Total mandatory and discretionary .. 

1/ Included in Budget under Operation and Maintenance 

21 Included in Budget under Procurement 

31 Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) 

4/ Contributions to Department of Defense Retiree 

Health Care Fund (Sec. 725, P.L. 108-375)(CBO est) 

GPO Oef hse~ba FY2014(report).rpd.t. -Filters: I,O,G 

FY 2014 

Enacted 

128,796,287 

159,869,726 

92,861,300 

62,994,741 

2,246,427 

35' 035' 166 

1,042,229 

-2,779,189 

85,026,942 

FY 2015 

Request 

128,957,593 

166' 002' 818 

89,660,299 

63,533,947 

1,234,468 

34,101,361 

1,024,194 

-260,685 

79,445,000 

Bill 

128,127,640 

164,631 ,638 

91,227,819 

63,362,890 

1,334,468 

33,795,719 

1,015,194 

960,452 

79,445,000 

Bi 11 vs. 

Enacted 

-668,647 

+4,761 ,912 

-1 ,633,481 

+368' 149 

-911 ,959 

-1,239,447 

-27,035 

+3,739,641 

-5,581 ,942 

Bill vs. 

Request 

-829,953 

-1,371,180 

+1,567,520 

-171,057 

+100,000 

-305,642 

-9,000 

+1,221,137 

-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 565' 093 '629 563,698,995 563,900,820 -1,192,809 +201,825 

7,462,000 7,002,000 7,002,000 -460,000 

-------------- -------------- ------------ ------------·- -----------·-- 572' 555 '629 570,700,995 570,902,820 -1,652,809 +201 ,825 

============== ============== ============== ============== ============== 

Defense 6/11/2014 10:24 AM Page: 14 
ADDITIONAL VIEWS 

FISCAL YEAR 2015 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL 

With this bill, the Committee has carried out its Constitutional 

responsibility to recommend the appropriations necessary to provide for the 

common defense of our Nation. The Committee did this in a collegial and 

bipartisan fashion consistent with its longstanding traditions. 

The base portion of this bill provides $490,751,963,000 in new budget 

authority covering all Department of Defense (DoD) and Intelligence 

Community functions except for Military Construction and Family Housing. 

This is $201,825,000 above the President's request, and $4,109,363,000 

above last year's enacted level. 

This bill provides the support required for our national security and the 

protection of U.S. interests at home and abroad. It provides stability for our 

military personnel, maintains readiness, and preserves the industrial base. 

The Committee continues to support efforts on sexual assault 

prevention and response, supporting high priority Sexual Assault Prevention 

and Response Program requirements, including training and funding of 

personnel, as requested. 

Funding is provided above the President's budget request for traumatic 

brain injury and psychological health research, suicide prevention outreach 

programs, and several other invaluable medical programs. The bill and report 

also carry language aimed at increasing cooperation between the 

Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs in their ongoing efforts to 

develop interoperable electronic health records. 

Continuing problems in DoD's strategic forces are also addressed. 

While it is disappointing that the Air Force included improvements in this 

area as unfunded priorities, this shortfall is addressed. 

The bill emphasizes maintaining the readiness of US armed forces, one 

of the most important priorities expressed by the Services' secretaries and 

Chiefs of Staff. The bill provides $1,000,000,000 above the request to fill gaps 

in key readiness programs, including $135,000,000 for the Army Reserve and 

Army National Guard. The bill also invests in programs vital to rebuilding and 

Page 1 uf'4 
resetting the force after nearly thirteen years of conflict. Examples include 

additional funding for facility sustainment and modernization, and depot 

maintenance. 

There is a focus on the important work of meeting the fiscal year 2017 

deadline for achieving fully auditable financial statements. The measure 

provides $8,000,000 above the request for the Undersecretary of Defense 

(Comptroller) to make business and financial system improvements 

throughout the Department. 

One other area of the bill we would like to highlight is the funding 

increase for the Humanitarian Mine Action program. Albeit a small program, 

its mission is of immense value. All too often, innocent civilians are the 

victims of explosive remnants of war. It is only right to share our military's 

expertise with host nations on the detection, clearance, disposal, and 

demilitarization of explosive ordnance. 

With regards to the industrial base, the legislation retains important 

Buy America provisions that were omitted from the budget request. Several 

other provisions and initiatives are aimed at securing our industrial base, 

including $220,000,000 to establish a program for the domestic development 

of a next-generation liquid fueled rocket engine. 

While the bill includes essential funding and legislative provisions, there 

are some reasons for concern as well. Fundamentally, these concerns have 

little to do with the detailed work of the Committee. Rather, these concerns 

reflect Congress' continued failure to confront the Defense Department's longterm fiscal challenges. In the fiscal year 2015 budget request, the Defense 

Department proposed significant initiatives to modify military pay, streamline 

TRICARE, and retire several weapons systems. These initiatives were 

proposed for DoD to stay under the fiscal year 2015 budget cap, provide for 

future flexibility, and meet the objectives of the US national security strategy. 

In this constrained fiscal environment, DoD indicates that growing 

compensation and health care costs will limit the Department's ability to fund 

readiness requirements in the future. From a historical perspective, the 

Department has seen health care costs grow from 4 percent of the 

Department's base budget in 1990 to almost 10 percent in 2012. Since 

TRICARE's establishment, Congress has also dramatically limited beneficiary 
contributions. DoD has taken steps internally to manage these costs. But 

these measures alone are insufficient to curb the expected increase in health 

care costs in the coming years. We look forward to recommendations that the 

Department of Defense may put forward in the fiscal year 2016 budget 

request to manage the growth of military compensation. 

DoD must also begin to retire aging and underperforming weapons 

systems to free resources needed for development and fielding of new 

systems. Unless DoD continues to enhance its weaponry, we risk losing the 

technological edge that US forces rely upon. Major systems proposed for 

retirement or termination in this request include: the A-1 0 Close Air Support 

(CAS) aircraft, the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior helicopter, the U-2 surveillance 

aircraft, seven E-3 AWACS aircraft, and the Ground Combat Vehicle. 

With few exceptions, these proposals have gained no traction within 

Congress. Most were excluded or were subject to language prohibiting or 

postponing their start in the recently passed National Defense Authorization 

Act. This is not to suggest that the Administration is uniformly correct in 

these proposals. Nor does this view dismiss the impacts of many of these 

initiatives. However, the alternative of staying the course and hoping for 

some fiscal relief in fiscal year 2016 is simply unrealistic. The sooner 

Congress reaches the consensus required to make the difficult decisions that 

are essential to deal with the reality of finite resources, the better we can 

provide for our national defense. 

In addition to the lack of congressional action on these proposals, the 

Administration undercut its own efforts by programming spending levels 

above the Budget Control Act (BCA) in fiscal years 2016 through 2019, by 

submitting the Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative, and also by 

submitting unfunded priority lists. 

Finally, and perhaps most important, is the problem faced by the 

Committee on funding for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). The 

Committee has been placed in a very difficult position in its deliberations on 

the fiscal year 2015 budget request, having to defend a $79,445,000,000 

"place holder". Recent decisions on the post-2014 troop levels in Afghanistan 

clear up the major policy issue that held back a detailed budget request. 

Unfortunately, the clarity gained was quickly muddled by the proposed $5 

billion Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund and the $1 billion European 

Page 3 of if' --
Reassurance Initiative. At a time when many in Congress are rightfully 

looking to limit what is an eligible expense in OCO and shift activities to the 

base budget, these new proposals further complicate the Committee's task. 

Clarity must be brought to the opaque nature of OCO. 

Although this bill leaves a number oflong-term issues unresolved, its 

consideration is necessary and timely. Moreover, the process for preparing 

this bill, and the recommendations it contains were done in a deliberate and 

thoughtful manner. As such, this bill upholds the best traditions of the 

Committee.