alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP15-146-000]


Mountaineer Gas Company, LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory 
Order

    Take notice that on March 27, 2015, Mountaineer Gas Company, LLC 
pursuant to section 207(a)(2) of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 
385.207(a)(2) (2014) filed a petition for Declaratory Order requesting 
the Commission to declare that certain facilities (part of the ``SM-108 
System'') in Cabell and Putnam Counties, West Virginia, being acquired 
by Mountaineer from Columbia Gas Transmission Company, LLC, (Columbia) 
and reconfigured into Mountaineer's local distribution system are 
``local distribution'' facilities exempt from the Commission's NGA 
jurisdiction pursuant to section 1(b) of the NGA.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9fffcebfaf6d7d5d0d7dceaccc9c9d6cbcdf9dfdccbda97ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80c6c5d2c3cfeeece9eee5d3f5f0f0eff2f4c0e6e5f2e3aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2015.

    Dated: April 6, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08368 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ISSUED: November 16,2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . TMENT OF 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS f~~~~PORTATION WASHINGTON, DC 

tU\~ NOV \ 1 A 3: \ 0 

In The Matter Of: ) DOCKET OPERA\\ONS 

) Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 

Pacific International Skydiving Center ) 

) Case No. 2014WP130012 

Respondent ) 

SUBPOENA 

TO: Randy Pacheco 

68-615 Farrington Hwy 

Waialua, HI 96791 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(3), YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and 

testify at a hearing scheduled to begin at the following place, date, and time: 

1. Location: 

2. Date: 

3. Time: 

United States District Court, District of Hawaii 

300 Ala Moana Blvd. 

Honolulu, HI 96850 

December 13,2016 

9:00a.m. local time 

This subpoena is issued because the Respondent, Pacific International Skydiving Center, 

filed an application on November 12, 2016 requesting your presence to testify at this hearing. If 

you have any questions about the subpoena, you should contact the Respondent's counsel at the 

address and telephone number listed below. 

The provisions of 14 C.F .R. § 13 .228(b) allow you to file a motion to quash or modify this 

subpoena with the undersigned judge. The applicant shall describe, in detail, the basis for the 

application to quash or modify the subpoena including, but not limited to, a statement that the 

testimony is not relevant to the proceeding or that the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive. 

A motion to quash or modify the subpoena will stay the effect of the subpoena pending a 

decision by the undersigned judge on the motion. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.229, you are entitled to the same fees and mileage expenses as are 
paid to witnesses appearing in the courts of the United States. These fees shall be paid by the 

Respondent, the party at whose request you have been subpoenaed. 

If you fail or refuse to comply with this subpoena, a party may, in accordance with 14 C.F.R 

§ 13 .228( c), apply to the local federal district court to seek judicial enforcement of the subpoena. 

Subpoena issued at the request of: 

Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 

8900 SW 107th Avenue, Suite 203 

Miami, FL 33176 

TEL: 305-598-4841 

FAX: 305-598-4842 

Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 

7,.-:....___ 

DOUGLAS M. RA WALD 

Administrative Law Judge 

Subpoena, page 2
Test File
<PAGE>

                           [GRANT THORNTON LETTERHEAD]

The US Member Firm of 
Grant Thornton International


                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our reports dated February 26, 1999, accompanying the 
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report 
of Schlotzsky's, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 1998. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of 
said reports in the Registration Statements of Schlotzsky's, Inc. on Forms S-8
(File No. 333-57077, effective June 17, 1998 and File No. 333-37785, 
effective October 14, 1997 and File No. 333-03809, effective May 15, 1996).





/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
-------------------------------
GRANT THORNTON LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 31, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 5.1

                            Erwin Thompson & Hascheff
                                A Law Partnership
                       Including Professional Corporations


ONE EAST LIBERTY, SUITE 424                         TELEPHONE:  (702) 786-9494
POST OFFICE BOX 40817                              FACSIMILE:   (702) 786-1180
RENO, NEVADA 89504                                  E-MAIL:  erwin@renolaw.com
                                                    WWW:http://www.renolaw.com
THOMAS P. ERWIN
FRANK W. THOMPSON
PIERRE A. HASCHEFF
                                                              June 1, 1998

Financial Federal Corporation
400 Park Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, NY  10022

         Re:      Registration Statement on Form S-3

         We are acting as counsel for Financial Federal Corporation, a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of $115,000,000 aggregate principal amount
of 42% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2005 (the "Notes"), and such
indeterminate number of shares of Common Stock, $0.50 par value per share (the
"Common Stock"), of the Company, as may be required for issuance upon conversion
of the Notes (the "Conversion Shares"). The Notes and the Conversion Shares are
to be offered and sold by certain securityholders of the Company (the "Selling
Securityholders"). In this regard we have participated in the preparation of a
Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the Notes and the Conversion
Shares. (Such Registration Statement, as it may be amended from time to time, is
herein referred to as the "Registration Statement")

         We are of the opinion that the Notes have been duly authorized and are
binding obligations of the Company entitled to the benefits of the Indenture
dated as of April 15, 1998, between the Company and The First National Bank of
Chicago, as Trustee. We are of the further opinion that the Conversion Shares
have been duly authorized and, when issued by the Company upon conversion of the
Notes in accordance with the Indenture, will be legally issued, fully paid and
nonassessable.

         We consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5.1 to the
Registration Statement and to the use of our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Registration Statement and in the Prospectus included therein,
as originally filed or as subsequently amended or supplemented. In giving such
consent, we do not consider that we are "experts" within the meaning of such
term as used in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued thereunder, with
respect to any part of the Registration Statement, including this opinion as an
exhibit or otherwise.

                                          Very truly yours,



                                          /s/ ERWIN THOMPSON & HASCHEFF
                                          -----------------------------
                                          ERWIN THOMPSON & HASCHEFF
****

**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-102584 of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated March 12, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc. asof and for the year ended December 31, 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, “Goodwill and Other IntangibleAssets”, effective January 1, 2002) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, NJMarch 28, 2003
No. 2,320.

#### HENRY HANCOCK, Respondent, *v.*PIO PICO, Appellant.

Pkactice. — De:fadi.t.—where a defendant is personally served in the county in -which the action is brought, with the summons and copy of the complaint, and leaves the State without having prepared and verified an answer, and his attorneys do not answer for him, the Court is justified in rendering judgment by default, and in refusing to open the default.

Appeal from the District Court of the Seveuteeuth District, Los Angeles County.

The complaint in this case alleges that, in the month of October, A. D. 1861, the defendant collected and received as Trustee of the plaintiff, the sum of six thousand one hundred and twenty dollars, of which the defendant afterward, in the exercise of said trust, paid and expended the sum of five thousand dollars; that, in the month of January 1868, plaintiff demanded payment of the balance remaining in the hands of defendant amounting to one thousand one hundred and twenty dollars, and that defendant refused, and still now refuses to pay the same or any part thereof.

The other facts are stated in the opinion.

*Glassell, Ghapmcm, & Smith,*for Appellant.

*John B. Felton,*of Counsel.

*154
      *W. A. Cornwall*and *Chas. H. Larrabee,*for [Respondents.

Wallace, J.

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court, Temple, J., Cbockett, J., and [Rhodes, C. J., concurring:

A judgment by default having been rendered against tbe defendant in an action upon contract for tbe recovery of money, be made a motion to open tbe default, and from tbe order denying tbe motion be brings tbis appeal.

Tbe defendant was personally served, in tbe county in wbicb tbe action was brought, with tbe summons and copy of tbe complaint, wbicb was verified in tbe usual form. He retained attorneys, to whom be entrusted tbe defence of tbe case, and then left tbe State and went on a visit to the State of New York without having prepared and verified an answer. In bis absence bis attorneys did not verify it for him. Tbe result was a default for want of answer, and final judgment followed.

We think that tbe Court below did not err in refusing to open tbe default under these circumstances. There was neither surprise nor excusable neglect in tbe defendant leaving tbe State, and thus deliberately placing bis case in such a situation that no defence could be made for him. No excuse is pretended to be shown why be did so.

Judgment is affirmed with twenty per cent, damages.

Sprague, J., expressed no opinion.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
[PriceWaterhouseCoopers ehf Letterhead]



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-56996) of our report dated March 9, 2001 relating
to the financial statements, which appear in deCODE genetics, Inc.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


PricewaterhouseCoopers ehf
Reykjavik, Iceland
March 23, 2001


/s/ Valdimar Guonason                          /s/ Vignir R. Gislason
------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Valdimar Guonason                              Vignir R. Gislason
OVERVIEW

s฀46!฀PLANS฀TO฀ELIMINATE฀ALL฀WET฀ASH฀AND฀GYPSUM฀ storage in the TVA system and convert its 11 operating coal-fired power plants to dry storage. s฀4HE฀CONVERSION฀PLAN฀WAS฀DEVELOPED฀FOLLOWING฀THE฀ $ECEMBER฀฀฀ASH฀SPILL฀AT฀+INGSTON฀&OSSIL฀0LA NT s฀4HE฀GOALS฀ARE฀TO฀INSTALL฀STATE
OF
THE
ART฀EQUIPMENT฀ to ensure safety and regulatory compliance and to position TVA as an industry leader in the management of ash and gypsum.

PROGRAM DETAILS s฀3IX฀WET฀mY
ASH฀AND฀฀WET฀BOTTOM
ASH฀STORAGE฀ processes will be converted to dry storage. s฀&OUR฀GYPSUM฀DEWATERING฀PROCESSES฀WILL฀BE฀INSTALLE D s฀.EW฀ASH฀DISPOSAL฀FACILITIES฀WILL฀BE฀DEVELOPED฀TO฀ handle future plant operations. s฀%IGHTEEN฀EXISTING฀ASH฀AND฀GYPSUM฀PONDS฀WILL฀BE฀ closed and capped according to EPA guidelines. s฀3TORAGE฀FACILITIES฀THAT฀WOULD฀BE฀CONSIDERED฀A฀ high risk in the highly unlikely event that they might fail will be converted first. (Independent evaluations have not shown any TVA storage facility in danger of failing.) s฀46!฀EXPECTS฀THE฀CONVERSION฀PROGRAM฀TO฀COST฀ $1.5 to $2 billion and take eight to 10 years to complete. s฀!DDITIONAL฀DISPOSAL฀FACILITIES฀WILL฀BE฀DEVELOPED฀TO฀ handle future plant operations.

CONVERSIONS PLANNED FOR EACH TVA

FOSSIL PLANT
Allen ฀NEAR฀-EMPHIS฀4.฀฀UNITS฀฀-7 s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Bull Run

฀NEAR฀/AK฀2IDGE฀4.฀฀UNIT฀฀-7 s฀'YPSUM฀DEWATERING s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE Colbert ฀NORTHWEST฀OF฀-USCLE฀3HOALS฀!,฀฀UNITS฀ 1,350 MW) s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Cumberland

฀NORTHWEST฀OF฀.ASHVILLE฀4.฀฀UNITS฀ 2,600 MW) s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Gallatin ฀NORTHEAST฀OF฀.ASHVILLE฀฀UNITS฀฀-7 s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

John Sevier

฀NEAR฀2OGERSVILLE฀4.฀฀UNITS฀฀-7 s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Johnsonville NEAR฀7AVERLY฀4.฀฀UNITS฀฀-7 s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Kingston

฀NEAR฀+INGSTON฀4.฀฀UNITS฀฀-7 s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE s฀'YPSUM฀DEWATERING

Paradise ฀NORTHWEST฀OF฀(OPKINSVILLE฀+9฀฀UNITS฀ ฀-7 s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE s฀'YPSUM฀DEWATERING

Shawnee ฀NEAR฀0ADUCAH฀+9฀฀UNITS฀฀-7 s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Widows Creek

฀NEAR฀3TEVENSON฀!,฀฀UNITS฀ 1,969 MW) s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE s฀'YPSUM฀DEWATERING 

# TVA’s Conversion of Wet Ash and Gypsum to Dry Storage
Exhibit 99.4

Certification of the Principal  Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge,  (i) the Form 10-QSB of
Weststar  Financial  Services  Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended
March  31,  2005 (the  "Report"),  as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods  presented
therein.


                                    WESTSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Date: May 11, 2005              By: /s/   Randall C. Hall
                                    --------------------------------------------

                                    Randall C. Hall
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    and Principal Accounting Officer


                                                                              26
[LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP]






The Board of Directors
Big Foot Financial Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-57981) on Form S-8 of Big Foot Financial Corp. of our report dated July 26,
2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Big Foot Financial Corp.
and subsidiary as of June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2002, which report is incorporated
by reference in the June 30, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Big Foot
Financial Corp.



                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
September 20, 2002
#### William Keeler, Resp’t, *v.*Maria Dennis, Appl’t.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department,*

*Filed January,*1887.)

Pbactice — Opening default — Effect of refusal of application to POSTPONE TRIAL.

The right to set aside a default is not affected by the fact that the trial court refused to postpone the trial. The motion not being regarded as an appeal from that order.

Appeal from an order of the Monroe special term, opening a default taken at the Cayuga circuit, and setting aside the verdict there rendered and the judgment entered thereon.

*J.*<f *T. H. Courtney,*for appl’t; *A. P. Smith,*of counsel. *S. Hdwin Pay,*for *resp’t; II. V. Howland,*of counsel.

*480Smith, P. J.

The affidavits used for and against the motion to open the default presented a conflict in some respects which the special term was called on to decide, and as the decision cannot be said to be clearly against the weight of evidence, it is conclusive. Assuming as we must, therefore, that the moving affidavits are substantially true, a satisfactory case was made for granting the motion, the details of which it is not necessary to state.

The order made at the circuit refusing the plaintiff’s application to postpone the trial, does not stand in the way of the motion to open the default taken subsequently at the same circuit. The moving papers present some material facts in addition to those stated on the application to postpone. And it has been held that the right to set aside a default is not affected by the fact that the trial court refused to postpone the trial, the motion not being regarded as an appeal from that order. *Cahill*v. *Hilton, 3*1 Hun, 114; S. C. aff’d, 96 N. Y., 675.

The order should be affirmed with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Barker, Haight and Bradley, JJ., concur.

So ordered.
#### *EX PARTE E. H. Lyde and D. Mandeville, committee of C.*Mandeville, *a lunatic.*

The committee of a lunatic is entitled to five per cent, commissions for receiving and paying out the funds of the lunatic.

The only point decided in this case will be sufficiently understood from the following opinion of the Court of Appeals delivered by ’

*4Johnson, J.

The only question submitted to the Court, is whether the committee appointed by the Circuit Court to manage the estate of a lunatic, is entitled to compensation for their care and labor bestowed upon it ? And I am at a loss to conjecture how any doubt could arise about it. The 11th Sect, of the Act of 1745, which is preserved by Judge Brevard, (1 Brev. Dig. 392, Tit. Guardian and Ward) expressly allows to executors, administrators, guardians, and *trustees,*for their care, trouble and attendance in the execution of their trusts, *2\*peí-cent. for receiving, and *2\*per cent, for paying away all monies that may pass through their hands, in the management of the estate committed to them. And by 12th Sect, of the same Act (P. L. 202 — 3) they are authorized when they have had extraordinary trouble in the discharge of their duty, and are not satisfied with the allowance, to *bring*an *action in the*Court of Common Pleas, where they are entitled to recover an additional compensation not exceeding five per cent., in addition to the sum so allowed. Judge Grimke, it is true, has not retained the 11th Sect, of the Act, but the word “trustee” is used in the 12th Sect, in reference to it, *and it is*evident *that it was a mere*omission. The office of a committee of a lunatic is that of trustee. The duties to be performed ar.e those of trustee, and the invariable practice of the Court has been, to allow them, compensation. We are, therefore, very clearly of opinion that for ordinary care and trouble, this committee are entitled to the ordinary commissions, and if in the discharge of their duties, they are compelled to bestow extraordinary care and trouble, they will be entitled to bring their suit in the Common Pleas, to recover the additional compensation provided by the Act.

O’Neall and Harper, JJ. concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS ON PAGES TWO AND THREE
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,913,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,322,141
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,838,402)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,785,319
<PP&E>                                      23,694,008
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,832,588)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             132,759,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,179,662
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,135
<OTHER-SE>                                  74,671,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               132,759,381
<SALES>                                     14,815,504
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,938,416
<CGS>                                        4,403,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               41,930,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,246,398
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,279,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,871,193
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,525,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,346,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    3,819,592
<NET-INCOME>                                   526,437
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>