alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|=                                                                    |                              
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Household Finance Corporation                                       
|Household Revolving Home Equity Loan                                
|Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates - Series 1995-2
|P & S Agreement Date:              Nov 1, 1995                      
|Original Settlement Date:           Nov 21, 1995                    
|Cusip Number of Class A-1 Certificates:     441919AG2               
|Cusip Number of Class A-2 Certificates:     N/A                     
|Original Sale Balance:             $637,660,000                     
|=                                                                    |                              
|                                                                     |                              
|                                                                     |                              
|                                                                     |                              
|                                                                     | Sum of 1/20/2000 - 12/20/2000
|2000 AGGREGATE PAYMENTS                                             
|                                                                     |                              
|Distribution Date                                                    | Total 2000 (1)               
|                                                                     |                              
|Class A-1 Interest Distributed                                       | 7,399,130.60                 
|Investor Principal Distribution A-1                                  | 41,422,983.97
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB of
Weststar Financial Services Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented
therein.

                                    WESTSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Date: May 4, 2004               By: /s/ Randall C. Hall
                                    --------------------------------------------

                                    Randall C. Hall
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    and Principal Accounting Officer


                                                                              26
Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) Business Environmental Leadership Council (BELC) EPA Webinar -- June 5, 2

Reid Harvey, CAMD, OAP & Kevin Culligan, SPPD, OAQPS

First Name Last Name Company

Wendy Graham Air Products

Mike Palazzolo Alcoa

Ben Squires Alcoa

Harold Reed American Water

Tom DePonty AREVA

Kaj Jensen Bank of America

Dave Pogue CBRE

Bruce Wilcoxon ConocoPhillips

Malcolm Fawcett ConocoPhillips

Ann Loomis Dominion

Paula Hamel Dominion

Lenny Dupuis Dominion

Gregory Ryan DTE Energy

Karen Britto DTE Energy

Kevin Leahy Duke Energy

Dan Weiss Duke Energy

Richard Kunkel Duke Energy

Jackie Carney Exelon

Audrey Lyke Exelon

Bill Brady Exelon

Larry Boggs GE

John Oldi GE

Ryan Murray GE Aviation

Cameron Pratt Holcim (US)
Erika GuerrA Holcim (US)

Svetlana Zenkin HP

Edan Dionne IBM

Stephen Harper Intel

Jennifer Layke Johnson Controls

Sandy Taft National Grid

Christine Milligan National Grid

Gideon Katsh National Grid

Brian Marrs NRG

William Chernicoff Toyota

Andrea Howell Weyerhaeuser

Steve Woock Weyerhaeuser Company
s Environmental Leadership Council (BELC) EPA Webinar -- June 5, 2014

Questions Asked

Q: is there a 6 percent cap on nuclear?

Q: Are states required to include some of each of the 4 building blocks in their plans, or if 

they can meet their state goal without increasing RE or EE is that permitted?

Q: We are all trying to examine the measures to meet your state's goal. When doing the 

calculation, are all generation sources, except hydro, eligible to be in the demoninator - 

all coal, gas, nuclear, RE and EE?

Q: What was EPA's rationale for setting rate-based goals for each state instead of massbased goals? Are the equivalent mass-based goals for each state provided in the 

technical support documents?

Q: Just to add to Ann Loomis' question....what about a nuclear plant whose license 

expires in 2025?

Q: Another question. For states that have achieved significant emissions between 2005 

and 2012 (the baseline), does the rule allow states to credit these early reduction 

activities?

Q: On the point that this was a bottom up calculation ... so they looked at what was 

feasible/plaubible for tech deployment during that time, these state numbers were teh 

outcome of that analysis.

Q: On the bill question (8% ee reducing bills). Is that 8% based on what is already

happening re ee trends, or based on what they think is additional ee?

Q: You say that states can average over time to meet target-- I assume the 2030 targert? 

And I have read stories today suggesting that most of reductions are front loaded. Why

are those stories incorrect? 
Q: Could we have a more detail explanation of how the costs of the rule where 

calculated? what models were used? 

Q: Separate from the previous offset question, use of biomass is tentatively addressed by

EPA in the preamble as potentially being considered as qualifying for CO2 emission 

reduction pending the finalization of the Accounting Framework, if I have captured that 

accurately. How is EPA going to add that into the proposed rule once the Framework is 

issued?
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF LINDA BRYSON


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

      In connection with the Periodic Report of Quantum Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
 I, Michael Kelleher, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
 ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: January 6, 2006                      By: /s/ Michael Kelleher
                                                 -------------------
                                                   Michael Kelleher
                                                   President
*Georgetown.*

Heard before Chancellor Desaussure.

#### Stukes and others *vs.*Alexander Collins and wife, administrators of Skinner.

CASE

An executor selling on a credit the personal estate of the deceased, and not taking personal security from tiie purchaser, as prescribed, by the order of the court of ordinary, is liable for the debt, in case of the insolvency of the purchaser, but such insolvency must be established, before the executor’s estate is made absolutely liable.

The principal question in this case, is upon the allcg-ed liability of Skinner’s estate to make good a debt due to the estate of Mary Ridgcll, of which he was executor. Skinner as executor applied to the ordinary for leave to sell the personal estate of his testator. The ordinary gave leave to sell on the terms proposed in the petition, to wit, that the sale should be on a credit of twelve months, the purchasers giving bon.d with sufficient peiv *208sonal security. At the sale,' James Magill became, a: purchaser to the amount of 1191. 4s. and gave his bond dated 7th of March, 1797, to George Skinner as executor*, payable in less than a twelve month, but without any security to the *bond;*Skinner kept the bond and no suit was brought on it till his death, which occurred in 1801. The bond has been in the hands of his administratrix ever since, and no suit has been brought upon it *-,*hut she swears in her answer that she has always been ready and willing to give up the bond to the complainants, who were entitled to Mary Sidgell’s estate.

*207FEB’Y. 1812

*208The complainant refuses to receive the bond, allodg-ing that Skinner by taking the bond without personal security had made himself liable, and that Magill was insolvent; but no proof of insolvency was adduced. There can be no doubt upon this statement of facts, that the estate of Skinner will be bound for the amount of this bond, if Magiil’s estate should really prove to be *insolvent;*for the executor by taking the bond without requiring persorial security, as the terms of sale prescribed, made himself liable. But how liable ? I apprehend only in case any injury should result from his neglect: some proof should he furnished of that injury; none has been shewn. I think therefore the bond should be sued, and the insolvency ascertained before resort is had to Skinner’s estate.

It is therefore ordered and decreed that the bond be delivered up to the complainants with proper authority to sue the same, and if the money cannot be obtained by reason of the insolvency of Magill, or of his being out of the reach of the justice of the country, or of his estate being wasted, that the estate of Skinner in the hands of his administratrix shall be liable for the payment of the debt.

At the sale Skinner himself became purchaser of part of the personal estate, which has never been paid for. It is ordered and decreed, that the administratrix account with the complainants for the amount of his purchase with interest. The costs to be paid by the defendant.

There was no appeal from this decree.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Linda Bryson, Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Companies, Inc. certify
 that:

(1) I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-QSB of Quantum Companies,
Inc;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this periodic report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this periodic
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this periodic report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this periodic report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this periodic report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of the date within 90 days prior to filing date of this
     periodic report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)presented in this periodic report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

(6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
periodic report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 11, 2005                   /s/ Linda Bryson
                                                      -----------------
                                                       Linda Bryson
                             Chief Financial Officer
22121

#### Richard E. JACOBS, David H. Jacobs, Dominic A. Visconsi, R. F. Coffin, Edward H. Crane, and Anthony W. Weigand, co-partners doing business under the firm name and style of JVJ Columbia Joint Venture, Appellants, v. William K. HARMAN and Janice P. Harman, Respondents.

(316 S. E. (2d) 146)

Supreme Court

*18
      *William C. Stork*of *Barnes, Stork, Herlong, Wolff & Reyner,*Columbia, *for appellants.*

*W. Ralph Garris,*Columbia, *for respondents.*

May 30, 1984.

Per Curiam:

The appellant partnership initiated this action for specific performance of an option to purchase real estate. The trial judge denied the appellant’s Motion to Strike portions of the respondent’s Answer and overruled the appellant's objections to the repondent’s Requests for Admissions.

The parties assert that this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal from the denial of the Motion to Strike because it is in the nature of a demurrer. *Thomas v. Colonial Stores, Inc.,*236 S. C. 95, 113 S. E. (2d) 337 (1960). The *Thomas*rule does not apply to this equitable action for specific performance. The trial judge can best determine what is relevant in equity cases aféer introduction of the evidence. *Smith v. Heyward,*110 S. C. 148, 96 S. E. 289 (1918); *Pelfrey v. Bank of Greer,*270 S. C. 691, 244 S. E. (2d) 315 (1978).

The order overruling the objections to the Requests for Admissions is also not appealable before final judgment. *See Pendergrass v. Martin,*275 S. C. 413, 272 S. E. (2d) 172 (1980).

We, accordingly, dismiss the appeal without prejudice to raise the issue at trial.

Dismissed.
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Executive Officer Salaries 
 Effective April 1, 2013 

 

					
	 Executive Officer
	 	 Title
	 	 Annual Salary
(effective

April 1, 2013)

	 Ali, Syed B.
	 	President & CEO	 	$375,000
	 Chadwick, Arthur D.
	 	CFO & VP Finance and Admin	 	$300,000
	 Jain, Anil K.
	 	Corporate VP IC Design	 	$300,000
	 Pangrazio, Vincent P.
	 	SVP & General Counsel	 	$285,000
# A SITKA ECONOMIC DEVELOP:MENT ASSOCIATION 329 Harbor Drive, Suite 212 ' Sitka, Alaska 99835**~:' {91)7}747,-~60**  • fax (907) 747-7588 www.sitka.net November 13, 2014 

### Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 Docket OST**~** 1998-4899 t.**·~** q_ LJ

The SitkaEconomic DevelopmentAssociation strongly supports AlaskaAirlines application for the Essential Air Service program for Southeast Alaska in orderto serve the communities of Cordova, Yakutat, Gustavus, Petersburg, and Wrangell. In Southeast Alaska we cannot drive to a regional airport asthere are no roads connecting our communities. Cordova, Yakutat, Gustavus, Petersburg, and Wrangell are small communities in Southeast Alaskathat rely on EAS to provide basic transportation needs for residents to conduct business, seek healthcare, and visit family in other communities. The primary industries (those that bring new money into the economy) in Southeast Alaskarely heavily onreliable air service. The , industries include: fishing, tourism, mining, and government. For example, Petersburg, and Cordova are major commercial fi.shing ports that rely on the service provided by Alaska Airlines. In2013 Cordova and Petersburg ranked as the 7thand 12th most productive seafood ports in theUnited Statesbased onthe value oftheirharvests. In addition, all ofthese communities have sport fishing lodges and charter fishing operations that rely on Alaska Airlines to serve their customers. These businesses would not exist without reliable air service. To lose EAS service would bedisastrous to the regions primary industries and the economy of Southeast Alaska. We therefore fully supportAlaska Airlines application for Essential Air Service for Southeast Alaska. Sincerely,

Garry A. White, Executive Director
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Hassan M. Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/HASSAN M. AHMEDHassan M. AhmedChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule cotnains summary financial informatoin extracted from the Audited
consolidated Financial Stateents of AlphaNet Solutions, Inc. as of December 31,
 1999 and for the 12-month period ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                        U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 16,485
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                    29,989
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,533
<INVENTORY>                                     49,322
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,860
<PP&E>                                           7,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,021
<SALES>                                        136,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,563
<CGS>                                          110,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                       794
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,142
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18<F1>


<FN>
<F1>
This amount is in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement No. 128.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

          - [F.C.S.C. Meeting and Hearing Notice No. 04-15]

The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its regulations (45 CFR 503.25) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of open meetings as follows:

*Thursday, April 16, 2015:*                     10:00 a.m.—Oral hearing on Objection to Commission's Proposed Decision in Claim No. IRQ-I-012. 11:30 a.m.—Issuance of Proposed Decisions in claims against Libya.                

*Status:*                     Open                

All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: Patricia M. Hall, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street NW., Suite 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6975.

Brian M. Simkin,

Chief Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-07873 Filed 4-2-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-BA-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ronald Heineman,  the Chief Executive Officer of Resolve Staffing,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A  of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter  ended March 31, 2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated: March 23, 2005


/s/ Ronald Heineman
------------------------------
Name: Ronald Heineman
Title: Chief Executive Officer