alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection
with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson, Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)
the Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
 applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
 the dates and for the periods indicated.  Date:
 November 6, 2008
By:
/s/ BRUCE
 A. WILLIAMSONBruce A. WilliamsonChairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive
Officer
Order 2014-4-31

Served: April 29, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 29th day of April, 2014

Joint Application of 

AIR TAHITI NUI; 

SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE;

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.;

KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART 

 MAATSCHAPPIJ N.V.; and

ALITALIA-COMPAGNIA AEREA 

 ITALIANA S.P.A.

for Approval of and Antitrust Immunity for Alliance 

Agreements under 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308 and 41309

Docket DOT-OST-2013-0077

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION

In this proceeding, Air Tahiti Nui (“Air Tahiti Nui”), Société Air France (“Air France”), Delta 

Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”), Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (“KLM”), and Alitalia 

Compagnia Aerea Italiana S.p.A. (“Alitalia”) (together, the “Joint Applicants”) sought a grant of 

antitrust immunity to operate a transatlantic immunized alliance. By Order 2014-3-17, issued on 

March 28, 2014, we tentatively concluded that approval of the Joint Applicants’ request for 

antitrust immunity was not required by the public interest. The Joint Applicants filed a timely 

response to Order 2014-3-17, moving to dismiss their application without prejudice.

In light of the above, the Department dismisses, without prejudice, the application filed by the 

Joint Applicants in Docket DOT-OST-2013-0077. 

ACCORDINGLY:

1. We grant the April 18, 2014, Joint Motion of the Applicants to Dismiss, submitted by Air 

Tahiti Nui, Société Air France, Delta Air Lines, Inc., Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V., 

and Alitalia Compagnia Aerea Italiana S.p.A. in this docket;
2

2. We will serve this order on all parties on the service list in this docket.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary for Aviation

and International Affairs

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00213-CV

EATX COFFEE, LLC,

Appellant

v.

TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION,

Appellee

From the 345th District Court, Travis County, Texas

Trial Court No. D-1-GN-15-005355

The Honorable Gisela D. Triana, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is 

REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings. It is 

ORDERED that appellant, EATX Coffee, LLC, recover its costs of this appeal from appellee, 

Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission.

SIGNED December 7, 2016.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 10:42 AM

To: 'ceb@smemaine.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Schandler, Andrea (FAA) ; Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha

(FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information



### February 20, 2015

Mr. Charles Burnham Special Projects Coordinator Sevee & Maher Engineers, Inc.

4 Blanchard Road

P.O. Box 85A Cumberland Center, ME 04021

Dear Mr. Burnham:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1008). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the prop osed UAS operation. The description should include

the size and include the aircraft’s manual.

 Provide description of proximity to airports.

 Describe the process used to document UAS discrepanc ies and the corrective acti on taken in the aircraft record. Examples of processes incl ude (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its UAS and ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the petitioner has elected to maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by March 6, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst2 Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 24, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 24, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0159. SOUTHERN RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT, INC., d/b/a 

INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES A/K/A BUCKHEAD IHOP v. 

ROBERTA CABAN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

14EV001507
EXHIBIT 32.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wrap-N-Roll USA, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Cliff Halling, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act  of  1934;  and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of the Company.




                 By:       /s/ Cliff Halling
                            Name:  Cliff Halling
                            Title:    Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Chief Financial  Officer

                           Dated:  November 14, 2003
​

EXHIBIT 13.1​

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Eni SpA, a company incorporated under the laws of Italy (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)

the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

​

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

​

Date: April 6, 2018

/s/ CLAUDIO DESCALZI

​

Claudio DescalziTitle: Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated by reference with any filing under the Securities Act.

E-27

---
See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4. 1

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-035-CV

NINA CIULLA, INDIVIDUALLY APPELLANTS

AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF 

SALVATORE CIULLA, AN

INCAPACITATED PERSON AND 

ANN CIULLA, AS NEXT FRIEND 

FOR NICHOLE CIULLA, 

ELIZABETH CIULLA AND 

ANTHONY CIULLA, MINOR

CHILDREN

V.

STEVE HAWKINS CUSTOM APPELLEE

HOMES, INC., A/K/A STEVE 

HAWKINS CONSTRUCTION 

COMPANY, INC., A/K/A STEVE 

HAWKINS BUILDERS

------------

FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------
The amended final judgment states that it “specifically does not dispose 2

of any of Plaintiff’s claims against . . . Paul Moss, individually and d/b/a Paul

Moss Framing.”

2

Appellants Nina Ciulla, individually and as next friend for Salvatore Ciulla,

an incapacitated person, and Ann Ciulla, as next friend for Nichole Ciulla,

Elizabeth Ciulla, and Anthony Ciulla, minor children, attempt to appeal from a

trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Steve Hawkins

Custom Homes, Inc., a/k/a Steve Hawkins Construction Company, Inc., a/k/a

Steve Hawkins Builders. On February 5, 2008, we notified Appellants that we

were concerned that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal

because the order granting summary judgment in favor of Steve Hawkins

Custom Homes, Inc., a/k/a Steve Hawkins Construction Company, Inc., a/k/a

Steve Hawkins Builders is a partial summary judgment that does not dispose of

all parties in the case, and it does not appear to be an appealable interlocutory

order. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 192–93 (Tex. 2001).

We noted that Appellants’ settlement of their claims against David Horton,

individually and d/b/a David Horton Framing, is reflected in the trial court’s April

13, 2007 “Amended Final Judgment as to Plaintiffs and David Horton,

Individually and d/b/a David Horton Framing,” but their claims against Paul

Moss, individually and d/b/a Paul Moss Framing, appear to still be pending. We

2
3

stated that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless

Appellants or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed within ten days a

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal or a copy of a signed order

or judgment finalizing the case in the trial court. No response or additional

signed order or judgment has been filed.

The record reflects that Appellants’ claims against Paul Moss, individually

and d/b/a Paul Moss Framing, have not yet been disposed of. Accordingly,

because there is no final judgment or appealable interlocutory order, it is the

opinion of the court that this case should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 13, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000791067
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PTSP I-C
                                     
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                    33,065
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             70,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         103,622
<PP&E>                                 3,639,734
<DEPRECIATION>                         3,464,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           359,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     13,520
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               332,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             359,321
<SALES>                                  467,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         470,909
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            472,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              (1,446)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Magnum Hunter Resources,
Inc.  on Form S-4 of our report  dated March 14, 1997 (April 30, 1997 as to Note
16), appearing in the Prospectus,  which is part of this Registration Statement,
and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
July 11, 1997
A SITKA ECONOMIC DEVELOP:MENT ASSOCIATION 

329 Harbor Drive, Suite 212 ' Sitka, Alaska 99835 ~:' {91)7}747,-~60 • fax (907) 747-7588 www.sitka.net 

November 13, 2014 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket OST ~ 1998-4899 

t. ·~ q_ LJ 

The Sitka Economic Development Association strongly supports Alaska Airlines application for 

the Essential Air Service program for Southeast Alaska in order to serve the communities of 

Cordova, Yakutat, Gustavus, Petersburg, and Wrangell. In Southeast Alaska we cannot drive to a 

regional airport as there are no roads connecting our communities. 

Cordova, Yakutat, Gustavus, Petersburg, and Wrangell are small communities in Southeast 

Alaska that rely on EAS to provide basic transportation needs for residents to conduct business, 

seek healthcare, and visit family in other communities. The primary industries (those that bring 

new money into the economy) in Southeast Alaska rely heavily on reliable air service. The , 

industries include: fishing, tourism, mining, and government. 

For example, Petersburg, and Cordova are major commercial fi.shing ports that rely on the 

service provided by Alaska Airlines. In 2013 Cordova and Petersburg ranked as the 7th and 12th 

most productive seafood ports in the United States based on the value of their harvests. In 

addition, all of these communities have sport fishing lodges and charter fishing operations that 

rely on Alaska Airlines to serve their customers. These businesses would not exist without 

reliable air service. 

To lose EAS service would be disastrous to the regions primary industries and the economy of 

Southeast Alaska. 

We therefore fully support Alaska Airlines application for Essential Air Service for Southeast 

Alaska. 

Sincerely, 

Garry A. White, Executive Director
Exhibit 12.1



                SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF DEBT-TO-EQUITY RATIO
                            (Dollars in Thousands)




                                                      July 31,
                                             -------------------------
                                                   2007           2006
                                             ----------     ----------

          Total debt                         $1,660,600     $1,527,661

          Stockholders' equity               $  387,753     $  390,379

          Debt-to-equity ratio                      4.3            3.9
                                                    ===            ===


                                       48
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6053

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LANCE BISHOP STEGLICH, a/k/a Robert Rock,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief

District Judge. (3:00-cr-00063-jpj-9)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lance Bishop Steglich, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lance Bishop Steglich appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his second motion for reduction of 

sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Steglich, No. 3:00-cr-00063-jpj-9 (W.D. 

Va. Dec. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3614 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3614

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS 
UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 
1958.
    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to extend 
temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration'', 
approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most 
recently amended by section 1 of Public Law 111-43 (123 Stat. 1965), is 
amended by striking ``September 30, 2009'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``October 31, 2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on September 29, 2009.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
2022 AFSAM

The National Guard Infantry Team Match

RT3170

SHOOTER SCORE ROST # TEAM_ID STATE/COUNTRY 

BAROST RED 555 1

1 CPL ROWAN, RYAN 103 AA UK

2 SSG CATT, KEVIN 101 AA UK

3 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 102 AA UK

4 WO1 DOUGLAS, JIM 100 AA UK

ALL GUARD (CHARLIE) 526 2

1 SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 132 AI CO

2 MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 139 AJ UT

3 MSG JACKSON, JEREMY L 127 AG NM

4 SGT THOMPSON, COLBY R 143 AK OK

USAR 509 3

1 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 115 AD

2 HUGHES, DEVIN 113 AD

3 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 114 AD

4 SFC WALSH, THOMAS M 112 AD UT

ALL GUARD (BRAVO) 491 4

1 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 162 BB CO

2 SGT NICKERSON, MAXIM E 147 AL VT

3 SFC CAPPS, JOSEPH A 122 AF AR

4 SFC LOVE, COLTON L 163 BB IL

BAROST WHITE 474 5

1 CW2 HOWARD, CHRIS 108 AC UK

2 CPL HAMILTON, JAMES 110 AC UK

3 CW2 WADDINGTON, JOHN 109 AC UK

4 LCPL GUIVER, HARRY 111 AC UK

BAROST BLUE 464 6

1 SSG GORDON, COLIN 118 AE UK

2 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 117 AE UK

3 MAJ ROSIE, LANCE 116 AE

4 SSG HAZELTON, JONATHON 119 AE UK

ALL GUARD (ALPHA) 405 7

1 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 123 AF AR

2 SSG FULMER, MICAH N 133 AI CO

3 SGT HALL, HOWARD H 129 AH CA

4 SFC VARGAS, ERIK J 128 AH CA

Monday, March 28, 2022 Page 1 of 2 Time printed: 17:41:34
SHOOTER SCORE ROST # TEAM_ID STATE/COUNTRY 

NETHERLANDS 220 8

1 CPL POOT, MARTIN 107 AB NETHERLANDS

2 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 106 AB NETHERLANDS

3 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX L 104 AB NETHERLANDS

4 SGT SMIT, ANDREW J 105 AB NETHERLANDS

Monday, March 28, 2022 Page 2 of 2 Time printed: 17:41:34
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE> 
<S>                                           <C> 
Learning Tree International USA, Inc.         (U.S.)
Learning Tree International, K.K.             (Japan)
Learning Tree International Ltd.              (United Kingdom)
Learning Tree International S.A.              (France)
Learning Tree International AB                (Sweden)
Learning Tree Publishing AB                   (Sweden)
Learning Tree International Inc.              (Canada)
Learning Tree International Ltd.              (Hong Kong)
Advanced Technology Marketing, Inc.           (U.S.)
Systems for Business and Industry, Inc.       (U.S.)
Technology for Business and Industry, Inc.    (U.S. Virgin Islands)
</TABLE>
# New Jersey Airmen support homes for veterans

/ Published Dec. 28, 2020

VINELAND, N.J. – Ten New Jersey Air National Guard Airmen from the 108th Wing and 177th Fighter Wing are activated and helping out at the Veterans Memorial Home as the staff continues to battle COVID-19.

The Airmen are conducting rapid COVID-19 testing for staff, which nets results in about 15 minutes, making sure N95 masks for staff fit properly and assisting with life enrichment for residents.

"Being part of the state's response to COVID has been exceptionally rewarding," said Capt. Sara Kucharski, a physician assistant with the 177th Fighter Wing who coordinates infection control for three New Jersey veterans' homes and two veterans' havens. "We have worked tirelessly with the state, as well as jointly with our fellow New Jersey Army Guard Soldiers, to help the fight against this invisible enemy."

COVID-19 protocols continue to restrict access to the veterans' homes. To keep connected with residents, families are relying on technology.

"This has been one of the most rewarding missions I've been a part of," said Tech. Sgt. John Walker, a medic with the 108th Medical Group. "We support our veterans who are at the age when they need a different type of support. I've been working in the life enrichment section helping to coordinate virtual visits and assisting with incoming donations, as well as soothing and comforting some of the family members who are struggling with not being able to see their loved ones."

"It feels pretty awesome to be a part of this mission," said Staff Sgt. Amy Amakihe, a medic with the 108th. "Being here at Christmas, and to be able to talk with the residents and to bring a smile to their faces, means a lot. I'm happy to help in any way that I can."

A total of 26 Soldiers and Airmen are activated and assisting at the three New Jersey veterans' homes.
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

104) ll-K-(B)-93 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

p.i 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:51 AM Sheet 104 of 325 
P.2 

P' 

II-K-(B)-93 

^ 

REVISED N0X CONTROL TECHNOLOGY COST ALGORITHMS 

Letter from T. Hogan, EEA to R. Short, EPA:EAB 

October 26, 1982 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-93