alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos
333-153283, 333-130018, 333-114164, 333-105318, 333-105317, 333-101320, 333-100763, 333-43574,
333-57782, 333-79573, 333-79553, 333-56905, 333-39747 and 333-28725) of Advent Software, Inc. of our report dated
March 12, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
March 12, 2009

---



QuickLinks
Premanufacture Notice (PMN) for P-05-0774

A pubic copy of the sanitized PMN for these substances is not 

available.

For further information on obtaining a copy of this document 

contact:

Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control Division (7405M), 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,

Environmental Protection Agency,

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20460-0001

Telephone: 202-564-9232

Email: Moss.Kenneth@epa.gov
# dep

west virginia d epart m en t o f env i ro n mental protect i on Exec uti v e O f

fi ce 60 1 5 7 th S T SE C harle s to n , WV 2 4 304 E arl R ay Tomblin , Go v ernor R an dy C
. Hu ff

m an , Cabi net Sec ret ary

dep . w v. go v March 14 , 2011 Mr. Shawn M. Garvin ( 3RAOO) Regional Administrator US EP A Region 3 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia , PA 19103-2029 Re: Maintenance Plan Updates for Fi v e W es t Virginia 1997 Ozone M aintenance Plan s
Dear A dministrator G arvi n: Th e State of West Virgi nia i s requesting that EPA appro v e re v ision s to the 8-hour o z one maintenance plans for the fi v e West Virginia 1997 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Areas , includin g Charleston , Huntin g ton , Parkersburg , Weirton and Wheeling. Thes e re v isions simply reallocate emissions from the e x istin g " s afety margin s " in each of the maintenance plans to increase the av ailable motor v ehi c le emi s s ion budgets (MV EB ) f or highway v ehi c l e s. These revisions do not establish budgets for air quality standard s o ther than the 1997 8-hour ozone standard (e.g. , not the 2008 8-hour ozon e standard or particulate matter standards). The MVEBs are being increased in anticipation of mandatory use ofEPA ' s most recently approved highway vehi c le emissions model , the Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) , in future transportation conformity determinations
. Preliminary use of the new model indicates that emission esti mates can be considerably di f ferent than simi l ar calculations using MOBILE6.2, which was used to create th e origin al MVEBs. Although the indi v idual maintenance plans w ere ori g inally submitted to EP A and appro v ed s eparately from on e another , these re v isions hav e been bundled together into one document because similar chan g e s are being made to all o f the plans , and to reduce the procedural burden on both the state and EP A. If EP A cannot appro v e one or more of the re v isions , w e ask that the remainder be processed and appro v ed on their indi v idual merits.
G ce : l Y, ~

~ ~ 

### Cabinet Secretary enclosures Promoting a healthy environment

.
Hawaii National Guard all-hazards response team earns validation
 
  By Air Force Staff Sgt. Carolyn Viss
  BELLOWS AIR FORCE STATION, Hawaii - Members of the Army and Air Force Hawaii National Guard all-hazards response team stood up a chemical, biological, nuclear, high-yield explosive enhanced response force Dec. 13 through 18 here to be evaluated by Joint Interagency Training and Education Center officials. The CERF team was validated after six days of setup and training scenarios, in which the total-force team responded to a simulated dirty bomb detonation containing sarin gas and had to conduct search and extraction, decontamination, and medical treatment on the "victims" of the scenario. "This exercise we're going through is evaluation of the team to be sure they meet standards set by the National Guard Bureau as far as responding to the disaster and treating the casualties that come out of the disaster," said Col. Stanley Sato, the 154th Medical Group commander. The CERF has been around since 2004 and is evaluated biennially, Sato said. Going through the validation together is particularly valuable since the Army's team changes when a whole unit deploys, whereas the Air Force medical team has remained much the same for six years and through three exercises, he said. "The Guard's primary mission is homeland defense; typically, we've responded to earthquakes, floods (and) storm cleanup," Sato said. "We've never had any incident with weapons of mass destruction in Hawaii like they did in the Oklahoma City bombing, but anything that might happen to the homeland, we would be there." Originally, there were 12 teams set up in nine Federal Emergency Management Agency regions, and Hawaii is a strategic location because of its isolation in the Pacific, he said. "Typically, local first responders would come out, like firefighters, paramedics, police, ... but when they get overwhelmed, they would call in the CERF," Sato explained. "[We] can never be too ready to respond. With a mass-casualty disaster, the local EMS system can be overwhelmed in a matter of hours." If a disaster occurs, the Guard could be called up by the governor to respond immediately. Additionally, Guard members could be sent to another state in an other-than-federal status, supporting not only Hawaii, but another state or territory, said Capt. Aaron Blanchard, the Hawaii National Guard CERF task force operations officer. "We enjoy being out here," he said. "It's a tough week for everybody, but we definitely stand ready to support civil authorities in a disaster. We've done it before, and we're ready to do it again."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 59 DB 2020 (No. 43 RST 2020)

:

ALLISON HEDGES BACELLI : Attorney Registration No. 306981

: 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2020, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated June 24, 2020, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Allison Hedges Bacelli, who has been on Inactive Status, has never been suspended or 

disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and 

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, 

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The 

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall 

be paid by the Petitioner.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS I ci AUSTIN

Honorable 

### I.L. chandl,er county maitor Montague County Montague, Texas Dear 

### Sir:

Your request 

### for oplnf rule ooneiaerea by this 

### dspar qusat as r0ima: 

### E fromyourretitle to rsoeive The case

### dioh I The sherlrr a two case8 aga 

# this

mm paid 

### stlceCouxt.

our dollars eaoh.,- that has beeCcolr a numbsr or years.

OaQes, to be taxed against the deimaant on conviotlon: "1. 

### For exeouting 

### aahhvtrarrant Or arre6t or 

### oaplas,or i-king arrestwft.hout warrant, twodollars."

### t Honorable I. L. 

### ohandlor- Page 8. I I In answer 

### toyour t3p60iri0 question we reepeotiullp

advise that it 18 our opinion that 

### 8hsrirrrr and oonstablse am 

### 0ntitha to a ree 

### 0r $2.00 ror each 18 asmsanor oaaea. TP arrert 

### Ma0 inmir- (Thlmor oourse ino u BI legal arrsate made In Justioa Court orlmlnal oaesa.) In this oonneotion we are enoloelng herewith a oopy of Opinion No. 0-ll00 of this de

## partmatrhioh may be helpful in various raot situations v&ioh you may hare b&ore you. to& very truly

k.TTOFBGtY

GEli- OF TEXAS
2023 AFSAM

Close Quarter Battle

RI3010

SHOOTER SCORE ROST # STATE/COUNTRY 

1 SSG CATT, KEVIN 122 UK 179

2 WO1 DOUGLAS, JAMES 120 UK 177

3 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 110 ND 175

4 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 108 AR 173

5 SFC WILLIS, RICHARD 135 KY 172

6 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 119 CO 171

7 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 138 UK 166

8 SSG GORDON, COLIN 136 UK 161

9 GYSGT RANTON, CHAD W 101 VA 158

10 SGT FLEITAS, NICKOLAS 103 157

11 SSG FULMER, MICAH N 116 CO 157

12 SSG STEWART, JUDE O 100 VA 156

13 LCPL BURGESS, MARCUS 129 UK 154

14 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 132 HI 153

15 SGT MULLER, SHAUN P 102 VA 153

16 SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 152 CO 152

17 CPL FILGATE, MICHAEL 130 UK 151

18 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 133 CO 151

19 1SG CAPPS, JOSEPH A 111 AR 149

20 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 134 ID 149

21 LCPL FERGUSON, ANDREW 128 UK 149

22 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 121 UK 148

23 SGT COLGAN, JOHNATHON 139 UK 146

24 CPL BUSSTRA, MARTIJN 114 NETHERLANDS 146

25 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX 113 NETHERLANDS 142

26 SFC PHELPS, STEFAN S 106 VA 142

27 MAJOR ROSIE, LANCE 123 UK 140

28 SFC ARCHAMBAULT, MAX 117 VT 139

29 SGT SMIT, ANDREW 140 NETHERLANDS 139

30 E5 DUERR, DAVID C 107 CA 138

31 CFN PICKLES, JOSHUA 131 UK 138

32 SFC KEENOM, DAVID D 141 TN 137

33 CPL ROWAN, BRIAN 137 UK 136

34 PVT DOPPERT, SANTINO 112 NETHERLANDS 135

35 SFC STAATS, JOHN A 118 AR 133

36 CW4 KNOTE, ANDY T 124 KY 132

37 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 142 130

38 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 115 NETHERLANDS 123

39 SFC GODEL, JASON W 125 TX 123

40 E-5 LUSH, TRAVIS C 105 VA 118

41 CPT PANTOJA, LUIS 126 KS 115

42 SGT MARLAR, SAMUEL A 143 MA 99

43 SFC BOLANOS, STEVEN L 104 CA 95

Page 1 of 2 Time printed: 5/3/2023 8:07:58 PM
SHOOTER SCORE ROST # STATE/COUNTRY 

44 SPC GADZIK, TIMOTHY J 127 IL 93

Page 2 of 2 Time printed: 5/3/2023 8:07:58 PM
#### WILLIAM ROBERTS, *Plaintiff in*Error, *vs.*EDMUND DELANEY, *Defendant in Error.*

ERROR TO THE EOND DU LAO CIRCUIT COURT.

Either party may notice a cause for trial, after it is at issue. It is then tried in its order.

The failure of the plaintiff to notice his cause for trial is not at any time a cause for non-suit.

This was an action of assumpsit,. brought in the Circuit Court for Fond du Lac county, by the plaintiff* in error against the defendant in error. ■

On the 1st day of January, 1853, the plaintiff filed his declaration, containing a special count upon a receipt given by defendant to plaintiff, as a special deputy sheriff, and also containing the common money counts. To which the defendant, on the 22d day of January, filed, a demurrer to the first count, and a plea of the general issue to the remaining counts.. At the succeeding April term of said court, the defendant, by his counsel, moved for judgment against the plaintiff, as in case of nonsuit, for want of a notice of trial, and during the pendency thereof, the plaintiff’s counsel offered to proceed to trial forthwith, which said offer the court refused, and allowed the motion. Judgment of nonsuit was thereupon rendered against the plaintiff, to reverse which this writ of error is brought.

*R. P.*Eaton, for the plaintiff in error.

*E. 8. Bragg,*for the defendant in error.

*383
      *By the*Court,

Whitow, C. J.

It appears by the "bill of exceptions, that this case was at issue on the 22d of January, 1858, and that a judgment of non-suit was entered at the succeeding term, on motion of the defendant, for want of a notice of trial by the plaintiff; the plaintiff objecting to the judgment and offering to go to trial on the merits.

We think this judgment erroneous.- Under our practice, (in the absence of any statute or rule on the subject,) either party may notice a cause for trial after it is at issue, and have it placed on the calendar. It is tried in its order, and is no more in the control of the plaintiff than of the defendant.

Allusion was made, at the argument, to the former practice in the State of New York, by which the court was authorized to non-suit the. plaintiff, unless he noticed the cause for trial, and brought it to a hearing at the first term after it was at issue. But it appears that this was in consequence of a provision of their statute.

We have no such statute, and in the absence of any, cannot follow their practice.

Judgment reversed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RICCO LEE BROWN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-30311

D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00026-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 23, 2014** 

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Ricco Lee Brown appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 55-month term of supervised released imposed upon revocation of supervised

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Brown contends that the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable

FILED

OCT 1 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
sentence because the new supervised release term is greater than necessary to

satisfy the goals of sentencing. He argues that the 55-month term is punitive and

does not serve the purpose of rehabilitation. We review for abuse of discretion, see

United States v. Collins, 684 F.3d 873, 887 (9th Cir. 2012), and find none. The

supervised release term is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including

Brown’s repeated breaches of the court’s trust. See United States v. Miqbel, 444

F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2006) (at a revocation sentencing, the court may sanction

the violator for his breach of the court’s trust).

AFFIRMED.

2 13-30311
Exhibit 32.1


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Ronald Heineman, the Chief Executive Officer of Resolve Staffing, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the fiscal
      quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated: June 28, 2005



/s/ Ronald Heineman
---------------------
Name: Ronald Heineman
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of In Full Affect,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Daniel
L. Hodges,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                    Corporate Organization of NCO Group, Inc.


           NCO Group, Inc.
           Pennsylvania corporation

                            Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries

           NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
           Pennsylvania corporation

           NCO Funding, Inc.
           Delaware corporation

           Management Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
           New York corporation

           NCO Teleservices, Inc.
           Pennsylvania corporation

           NCO Financial Systems of MI, Inc.
           Michigan corporation

           CRWF Acquisition, Inc.
           Pennsylvania corporation

           K&K Acquisition, Inc.
           Pennsylvania corporation

           CC Services, Inc.
           Pennsylvania corporation

           NCO Financial Systems of NC, Inc.
           North Carolina corporation

          Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of NCO Financial Systems of NC, Inc.


           Goodyear & Associates, Inc.
           North Carolina corporation
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonic Innovations, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen L. Wilson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sonic Innovations, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  | /s/ STEPHEN L. WILSON
|----- |  | ---------------------
|Name: |  | Stephen L. Wilson    
|Date: |  | November 14, 2003    



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Sonic Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by Sonic Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                         Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Rudy 45 (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the periods ending October 31, 2004,  January 31, 2005 and April
30,  2005,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Sonia Farrell,  President of the Company,  certify, to
the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of
2002, that:

            i.    The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            ii.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Rudy 45 and will
be retained by Rudy 45 and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.

Dated:  November 11, 2005

                                            /S/ SONIA FARRELL
                                            --------------------------
                                            Name:  Sonia Farrell
                                            Title: President
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-K Annual Report of Eldorado Resorts LLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. (collectively, the
"Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 24, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/GENE R. CARANOGene R. Carano, Chief Financial Officer
of Eldorado Capital Corp.
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
FARM-EX108-ActionrePensionPlanImputedIncome




Exhibit 10.8


ACTION OF THE
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE FARMER BROS. CO.
QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLANS


Farmer Bros. Co. Retirement Plan


The undersigned members of the Administrative Committee, having the authority to act on the matter set forth below, hereby approve the following:


WHEREAS, Section 10.01 of the Farmer Bros. Co. Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) permits amendments to the Plan from time to time. 


WHEREAS, this Committee deems it appropriate to amend the Plan as set forth below. 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended effective as of December 6, 2012, as follows:


The definition of the term “Compensation” in Section 1.02 is amended by changing the ninth paragraph to read as follows: “Compensation shall exclude imputed income for auto allowance or company-paid life insurance;  provided that such exclusion shall not apply to, and therefore such imputed income shall be included in the Compensation of, any  Participant whose Annuity Starting Date is on or before October 1, 2013.”


BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Amendment replaces the earlier amendment to Section 1.2 of the Plan dated December 6, 2012.
 
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Company, and the individuals who have been properly delegated authority for the administration of the Plan, are hereby authorized to do such other things as may be necessary or advisable to give effect to the foregoing resolutions.


Dated: March 18, 2013
	
		
	





/s/ H. Gomez
Title: VP & Controller
	





/s/  Tom Mattei, Jr
Title: VP & Corporate Counsel

	





/s/ L.P. Quiggle
Title: VP Human Resources
	





/s/ Mike H. Keown
Title: President & CEO

	 
	 









-1-