alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                          1999 EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE PLAN
                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2



         THIS  AMENDMENT TO THE  APPLEBEE'S  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.  1999 EMPLOYEE
INCENTIVE PLAN (the "Plan") is made effective this 9th day of March, 2001.

         WHEREAS,  the Plan contains certain provisions  regarding the number of
shares of common stock available for awards; and

         WHEREAS,  at a regular  meeting of the Board of Directors held on March
9, 2001, the Board agreed to a revision of the Plan, as hereinafter set forth.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         1.   That  Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended to increase the number of
              shares available for grant from 530,000 to 730,000.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the  Plan has  been amended  as of the day and year
first above written.



                                       APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.




                                   By: _______________________________
                                Title: ______________________________


<PAGE>


                         APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                          1999 EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE PLAN
                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3



         THIS AMENDMENT TO THE  APPLEBEE'S  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.  1999  EMPLOYEE
INCENTIVE  PLAN (the "Plan") is made effective  this 13th day of December, 2001.

         WHEREAS,  the Plan contains certain provisions  regarding the number of
shares of common stock available for awards and the definition of  "Retirement";
and

         WHEREAS,  at a  regular  meeting  of the  Board  of  Directors  held on
December 13, 2001,  the Board agreed to a revision of the Plan,  as  hereinafter
set forth.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

         1.   Section  2  of  the  Plan  is  amended  to  delete  therefrom  the
              definition of the term  "Retirement"  as it currently  appears and
              insert in its place and stead the following:

                   "Retirement"  means a Termination of Service by reason of the
                   Employee's  retirement at or after the Employee  reach age 65
                   or as  otherwise  specifically  provided in the option  grant
                   agreement as determined by the Committee."

         2.   Section  4.1 of the Plan is  amended  to  increase  the  number of
              shares   available  for   grant  from   799,500   (post-split)  to
              1,099,500.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Plan has been  amended as of the day and year
first above written.



                                       APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.




                                   By: _______________________________
                                Title: ______________________________
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No.95-20916

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN MICHAEL COSCARELLI, also

known as Mike Coscarelli,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR-H-94-284-2

 

October 18, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Michael Coscarelli appeals his sentence following

conviction for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. He

argues that the district court erred in refusing to reduce his

offense level by one level for “timely” entering his guilty plea

and by imposing a three-level enhancement based on Coscarelli’s

role as a “manager” or “supervisor” in the offense. We have

reviewed Coscarelli’s arguments and the record and find that the
2

district court did not clearly err in refusing to grant the onelevel reduction and in imposing the three-level enhancement.

United States v. Williams, 74 F.3d 654, 656-57 (5th Cir. 1996);

United States v. Musquiz, 45 F.3d 927, 932-33 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 116 S. Ct. 54 (1995).

AFFIRMED.
& 8

6 œ.

> bœ.> Allegro

f

œ.

> #œ.> nœ> œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

#œ

>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m.100, 2nd beat fi

j

œ

v

‰ ‰ œ.

P

œ ‰ œ ‰

5

œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ.

& œ. œ. œ. œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ ‰

13

œ ‰ œ ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ œ œ

. œ. œ. œ ‰ œ œ œ

.

& œ ‰ œ ‰

21

œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰

œ œ œ

. œ. œ.

29

œ. œ.

& œ. œ. œ. œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ.

> œ ‰ œ.

> œ œ œ œ œ œ J

œ ‰ ‰ œ. œ ‰ œ ‰ 37œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ.

& œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ ‰

45

œ ‰ œ ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ œ œ

. œ. œ.

& œ ‰ œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ ‰

53

œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰

œ œ œ

. œ. œ.

61

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Official Song of the National Guard Bureau

Eb Baritone Saxophone Words and Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

40th Army Band, VTARNG

& œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ.

> œ ‰ œ.

> œ

- œ œ œ œ œ J

œ ‰ ‰ œ. œ ‰ œ ‰

69

œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰

& œ ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ ‰

77

œ ‰ œ ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ œ œ

.

& œ. œ. œ ‰ œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ ‰

85

œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰

œ œ œ

.

& œ. œ.

93

œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ œ œ

. œ ‰ œ.

> œ ‰ œ.

> œ

- œ œ œ œ œ fi

J

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>

Ceremonial version,

from m.4

F

œ ‰ œ ‰

101

œ ‰ œ ‰

& œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. œ

>œ>

œ

> œ

> ‰ œ ‰

109

œ ‰ œ ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ ‰ œ ‰

& œ ‰ œ œ œ œ. œ. jœ ‰ ‰ œ

>

œ

>

œ

> œ

> ‰ œ ‰

117

œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ œ œ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰ œ ‰

& œ ‰ œ

> œ> œ

>

f

>œ. œ. > 125

œ. > œ.

> œ.> œ.

> œ.

> œ>

œ

>

œ

> œ.

> œ.> œ.

> œ.>  ̇.

>

sfp

 ̇.  ̇. jœ

v

‰ ‰ Œ.

ƒ

2 ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

-Eb Baritone Saxophone-
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3633 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3633

  To allow the funding for the interoperable emergency communications 
 grant program established under the Digital Television Transition and 
 Public Safety Act of 2005 to remain available until expended through 
               fiscal year 2012, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 2009

  Ms. Harman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow the funding for the interoperable emergency communications 
 grant program established under the Digital Television Transition and 
 Public Safety Act of 2005 to remain available until expended through 
               fiscal year 2012, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLIC SAFETY INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS GRANTS.

    (a) Notwithstanding section 3006(a)(2) of the Digital Television 
Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 (47 U.S.C. 309 note), sums 
made available to administer the Public Safety Interoperable 
Communications Grant Program under section 309(j)(8)(E) of the 
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(8)(E)) shall remain 
available until expended, but not beyond September 30, 2012.
    (b) The period for performance of any investment approved under the 
Program as of the date of enactment of this Act shall be extended by 
one year, but not later than September 30, 2011, except that the 
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information may 
extend, on a case-by-case basis, the period of performance for any 
investment approved under the Program as of that date for a period of 
not more than 2 years, but not later than September 30, 2012. In making 
a determination as to whether an extension beyond September 30, 2011, 
is warranted, the Assistant Secretary should consider the circumstances 
that gave rise to the need for the extension, the likelihood of 
completion of performance within the deadline for completion, and such 
other factors as the Assistant Secretary deems necessary to make the 
determination.
                                 <all>
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OH NY R AC HMAN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71960 A ge nc yN o. A 043- 543- 914 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B e f o r e : G O O D W I N , W A L L A C E , a n dT H O M A S , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . J ohnyR a c hm a n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j ud ge’ s r em ov alorder. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. “ [W ] e r evi ew f orw he the rs ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s af i ndi ng byc l e a r , une qui voc a l a nd



# FI LED JAN 06 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71960 2 c o n v in c in g e v id e n c e th a t [ R a c h m a n ] ab a n d o n e dh is law f u l p e rm a n e n t r e s id e n c e in the U ni t ed S t at es . ” Kh o da g h o lia n v . A s h c r o ft , 33 5 F . 3d 10 03 , 10 06 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport ’ s the a ge nc y ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha tthe g o v ern m en tm eti t s b u rd en o f sh o w i n g th atR ach m an l ack eda co n t i n u o u s, un i nt errupt ed i nt ent i on t o return t o the U ni t ed S t at es du ri ng the ei gh tye ar s he l i ved in I n d o n e s ia . See Ch a v ez - Ra m i r ezv . I NS , 792 F . 2d 932, 937- 38 ( 9th C i r . 1986) ( s ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport e d f i ndi ng aba ndonm e ntof

l a w f ul pe rm a ne nt r e s i de nc e w he r e a l i e n s pe nttw o a nd aha l f y e a r s i n c ountryof

c i t i z e ns hi p a f

t e rthe e x ig e n c yw h ic h c au s e dh e rto r e tu rn h a dp a s s e d ) ; cf . Khodaghol i an , 33 5 F . 3d at 1007- 09. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
### Contacts. 

### With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response Transport Canada Helen Tsai 08/17/10 No objection.

613·952-4362

Bombardier Ruxandra Popescu 08/18/10 No objection. Aerospace 514-855-5001

x88384 Regional Airline Dave Lotterer 08124/10 Email Association 202-367-1252

lotterer@1raa.org

, 

# ~AA-2.-011 

# 0- \

# 037
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Sandro
      Natale, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated:
                August ____, 2008
            /s/
                Sandro NataleName:
                Sandro NataleTitle:
                President & Chief Executive
                Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60061 Summary Calendar

DAN MCGREW, Father and Next Friend of Kosher McGrew, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN F. WHITAKER, in his official and individual capacity; COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; COPIAH COUNTY, MS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:96-CV-61WS

- - - - - - - - - - December 8, 1997 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The plaintiff appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Copiah County, Mississippi, Deputy Sheriff John Whitaker; the Copiah County Sheriff’s Department; and Copiah County. We find no error in the district court’s consideration of Deputy Whitaker’s affidavit explaining his prior deposition testimony. See S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc. , 72 F.3dNo. 97-60061 -2- 489, 496 (5th Cir. 1996). Plaintiff’s false-arrest claims fail because Deputy Whitaker had probable cause to arrest Kosher
McGrew. See Fields v. City of South Houston, Tex. , 922 F.2d 1183, 1189 (5th Cir. 1991). The district court did not err by entering summary judgment as to the plaintiff’s claim of defamation. See Blake v. Gannett Company, Inc. , 529 So.2d 595, 602 (Miss. 1986).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3170 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3170

To ensure that nothing in Federal law, other than an explicit statement 
   in an Act of Congress, shall be construed to provide an executive 
 agency with the authority to mandate, or implement a mandate, that an 
individual be inoculated by a COVID-19 vaccine, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 4, 2021

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To ensure that nothing in Federal law, other than an explicit statement 
   in an Act of Congress, shall be construed to provide an executive 
 agency with the authority to mandate, or implement a mandate, that an 
individual be inoculated by a COVID-19 vaccine, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Forced Vaccination for COVID-19 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR EXECUTIVE AGENCIES TO ISSUE COVID-19 VACCINE 
              MANDATES.

    (a) In General.--Unless specifically stated in an Act of Congress, 
nothing in Federal law shall be construed to provide an executive 
agency with the authority to mandate, or implement a mandate, that an 
individual be inoculated by a COVID-19 vaccine, including a mandate 
that an individual either be inoculated by such a vaccine or agree to 
undergo periodic testing for COVID-19.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
to permit or otherwise authorize Congress or an executive agency to 
enact or otherwise impose a mandate described in subsection (a).
    (c) Definition of Executive Agency.--The term ``executive agency'' 
means an executive agency as defined in section 105 of title 5, United 
States Code, excluding the uniformed services as defined in section 
101(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
2022 AFSAM

Night CQB

RN2

SHOOTER SCORE-Vs ROST # STATE/COUNTRY 

1 WO1 DOUGLAS, JIM 100 UK 10 187 - 2 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 124 9 178 - 3 SSG FULMER, MICAH N 131 CO 12 176 - 4 SSG CATT, KEVIN 101 UK 12 176 - 5 SGT HALL, HOWARD H 135 California 8 175 - 6 CPL ROWAN, RYAN 103 UK 7 175 - 7 SFC WALSH, THOMAS M 112 UT 9 173 - 8 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 102 UK 8 172 - 9 MAJ ROSIE, LANCE 116 10 171 - 10 SGT NICKERSON, MAXIM E 134 VT 9 171 - 11 SFC VARGAS, ERIK J 132 CA 7 170 - 12 CW2 WADDINGTON, JOHN 109 UK 10 166 - 13 CPL HAMILTON, JAMES 110 UK 8 164 - 14 MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 133 Utah 5 164 - 15 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 114 6 162 - 16 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 128 Colorado 7 160 - 17 SSG HAZELTON, JONATHON 119 UK 2 157 - 18 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 117 UK 0 157 - 19 SFC SAGER?, DEVIN S 129 Colorado 4 156 - 20 HUGHES, DEVIN 113 14 153 - 21 SFC KEENOM, DAVID D 125 TN 2 153 - 22 CW2 HOWARD, CHRIS 108 UK 2 151 - 23 SFC CAPPS, JOSEPH A 122 AR 5 150 - 24 MSG JACKSON, JEREMY L 121 New Mexico 1 145 - 25 SSG GORDON, COLIN 118 UK 8 137 - 26 LCPL GUIVER, HARRY 111 UK 7 135 - 27 SGT THOMPSON , COLBY R 120 Oklahoma 1 135 - 28 MSG SCHULTZ, ROY 104 NETHERLANDS 0 134 - 29 SSG LOVE, COLTON L 123 IL 1 127 - 30 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 126 0 127 - 31 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX L 127 Netherlands 3 125 - 32 SGT SMIT, ANDREW J 105 NETHERLANDS 3 118 - 33 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 106 NETHERLANDS 3 116 - 34 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 115 0 116 - 35 CPL POOT, MARTIN 107 NETHERLANDS 0 42 - 36 SSG ABRAHAMS, JESSE K 130 PA 0 0 - Page 1 of 1 Time printed: 3/26/2022 5:33:53 PM
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wanda D. Dearth,  the Chief Executive Officer of Resolve Staffing,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements
      of Section  13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


Dated: May 20, 2003

                                              /S/ WANDA D. DEARTH
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Name: Wanda D. Dearth
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer





<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Anchor Lamina Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Roy M. Verstraete, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    ROY M.
VERSTRAETERoy M. Verstraete, President andChief Executive Officer




Dated: February 27, 2003
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Seligman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RADVision Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date: July 31, 2003

/s/David Seligman*
------------------
David Seligman
Chief Financial Officer

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.