alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit_10-1.htm










Exhibit 10.1


 





 



	  	
Fahn Kanne & Co.


	  	
Head Office


	  	
Levinstein Tower


	  	
23 Menachem Begin Road


	  	
Tel-Aviv 66184, ISRAEL


	  	
P.O.B. 36172, 61361


	  	  
	  	
T +972 3 7106666


	  	
F +972 3 7106660


	  	
www.gtfk.co.il







 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-l (No. 333-128028) of Ituran Location and Control Ltd. of our reports dated May 24, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.


 





 


FAHN KANNE & CO.


Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)


 


Tel-Aviv, Israel


May 24, 2010







Certified Public Accountants


Fahn Kanne & Co. is the Israeli member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3660 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3660

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to promote tax parity 
      between the residential and business fuel cell tax credits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2009

Mr. Wu (for himself and Mrs. Bono Mack) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to promote tax parity 
      between the residential and business fuel cell tax credits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fuel Cell Tax Parity Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF CREDIT FOR RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENT 
              PROPERTY.

    (a) Maximum Credit Conformed to Business Credit.--
            (1) In general.--Paragraph (1) of section 25D(b) of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``$500'' 
        and inserting ``$1,500''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Subparagraph (A) of section 
        25D(e)(4) of such Code is amended by striking ``$1,667'' and 
        inserting ``$5,000''.
    (b) Removal of Principal Residence Requirement for Qualified Fuel 
Cell Property Expenditures.--Paragraph (3) of section 25D(d) of such 
Code is amended by striking ``used as a principal residence (within the 
meaning of section 121) by the taxpayer'' and inserting ``used as a 
residence by the taxpayer''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER15-861-000; EL15-53-000]

                    By order issued in this proceeding on March 16, 2015,[1]                                          the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission directed its staff to convene a technical conference to develop a record regarding issues related to imbalance energy price spikes experienced in PacifiCorp's balancing authority areas subsequent to PacifiCorp's full activation in the California Independent System Operator Corporation's Energy Imbalance Market, and to facilitate the development of a long-term solution. Parties wishing to file post-technical conference comments should do so on or before April 23, 2015.                

Dated: April 8, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp.,*                         150 FERC ¶ 61,191 (2015).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2015-08558 Filed 4-14-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40129

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GEORGE ANTHONY KNOTTS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-182-5

Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent George Anthony Knotts has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Knotts has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed 

to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Knotts’s claim of ineffective assistance 

of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40129 Document: 00512871666 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2014
No. 14-40129

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. 

denied, 135 S. Ct. 123 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Knotts’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Counsel’s alternative motion for leave to withdraw is 

DENIED as moot.

2

 Case: 14-40129 Document: 00512871666 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/16/2014
ã 8

6 Œ. x.

Allegro

f

Œ. x. !

For ceremonial version,

jump to m.100, 2nd beat

fi

J

x ‰ ‰ Œ.

choke

5 8 13 8 21 8 T.29

F

! T.

ã ! T. T. T. J

x ‰ ‰ Œ.

choke

37 8 45 8 53 8 T.61

F

! T.

ã ! T. T. T. J

x ‰ ‰ Œ.

choke

69 8 77 8 85 8 T.93

F

! T.

ã ! T. T. T. fi

J

x ‰ ‰ Œ.

Ceremonial version,

from m.4

choke

x. x. 101

P

x. x. x. x. T. x. x. x. x. x. x. T.

ã x. x. 109

x. x. x. x. T. x. x. x. x. x. x. T. x. x. 117x. x. x. x. T. x. x.

ã x. x. x. x. T. x. x. 125

F

T. x. x. T. x. x. x. x. T.

f

2

J

x ‰ ‰ Œ.

f choke

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Official Song of the National Guard Bureau Percussion 2

Crash Cymbals

Words and Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

40th Army Band, VTARNG
Exhibit 99.01

INSIGNIA SOLUTIONS PLC

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Insignia Solutions plc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark E. McMillan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/MARK E. MCMILLANMark E. McMillan
Chief Executive Officer
April 15, 2003 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Insignia Solutions plc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Linda C. Potts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/LINDA C. POTTSLinda C. Potts
Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2003 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Thomas F. Duszynski, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB/A of Absolute Waste Services, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this report;

Date:     August 5, 2005


                                           By:  /s/  Thomas F. Duszynski
                                              --------------------------------
                                                     Thomas F. Duszynski,
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Carroll A. Wallace, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this 10-Q Report of Exabyte Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated: November 20, 2006

/s/ CARROLL A. WALLACE                                      

Carroll A. Wallace

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Isaiah Arnold, plaintiff in error, vs. The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

To sustain the charge of marrying the wife of another, it is necessary to establish (he marriage either by the record thereof, or by the admission of the defendant, or by the testimony of some one who saw the ceremony performed, or by such other evidence as will clearly establish the fact. It must also be shown that the defendant knew, at the time of the marriage, that the woman was the wife of another.

Criminal Law. Marrying the wife of another. Before Judge Strozer. Mitchell Superior Court, May Term, 1874.

H. Morgan, by K. II. Clark, for plaintiff in error.

B. B. Bower, solicitor general, for the state.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The defendant was indicted in the county of Mitchell for “marrying the wife of another,” and on the trial thereof was found guilty by the jury. A motion was made for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and without evidence, contrary to law and the charge of the court, and because the court erred in charging the jury “that the living together as man and wife of the defendant and the woman charged to be the wife of another, was an admission of marriage,” when such evidence did not prove the consummation of the marriage in Mitchell county. The court overruled the motion for a new trial, and the defendant excepted. The 4532d section of the Code declares that “if any man or woman, being unmarried, shall *knowingly*marry the wife or husband of another person, such man or woman shall, on conviction, be punished by imprisonment and labor in the penitentiary for any time not less than one year nor longer than three years.” The offense with which the defendant was charged consists in marrying Malinda, the wife of Sam. Thomas, *knowing*that she was his wife. On the *575trial of criminal cases of this description, the marriage of the defendant to the wife of another should be proved, either by the record of his marriage or by the admission of the defendant as to the fact of his marriage, or by the testimony of some one who saw him married, or by such other competent evidence as will clearly and satisfactorily establish the fact of' his marriage, as alleged in the indictment. General reputation or report that he was married is not sufficient to authorize a conviction. The fact that he was actually married to the wife of another must be proved. It must also be proved that the defendant *knew*at the time he married Malinda Thomas that she was the wife of Sam. Thomas. The evidence in the record is not sufficient, in our judgment, under the law, to prove the fact of the marriage of the defendant to Malinda Thomas, nor does the evidence establish the fact that the defendant *knew*that she was the wife of Sam. Thomas at the time of the alleged marriage, and therefore the verdict was contrary to law. In the view we have taken of this case we express no opinion whether the alleged marriage was consummated in Mitchell county, under the evidence in the record, or not.

Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                                      PIXAR

                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                    1994             1995           1996
                                                                  --------         -------        -------
<S>                                                               <C>              <C>            <C>
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding:
     Preferred stock                                                20,000              --             --
     Common stock                                                   10,000          31,202         38,632
Number of common and common equivalent shares
     issued in accordance with Staff Accounting
     Bulletin No. 83                                                 9,669           7,024             --
Common stock equivalents                                                --           2,124          8,357
                                                                  --------         -------        -------

Total shares used in computing net income (loss) per share          39,669          40,350         46,989
                                                                  ========         =======        =======

Net income (loss)                                                 $ (2,372)        $ 1,627        $25,319
                                                                  ========         =======        =======

Net income (loss) per share                                       $  (0.06)        $  0.04        $  0.54
                                                                  ========         =======        =======

Pro forma net income (loss) data (unaudited):
     Income (loss) before taxes as reported                       $ (2,371)        $ 1,747
     Pro forma income taxes*                                             1              90
                                                                   --------         -------

      Pro forma net income (loss)                                 $ (2,372)        $ 1,657
                                                                  ========         =======

      Pro forma net income (loss) per share**                     $  (0.06)        $  0.04
                                                                  ========         =======
</TABLE>


----------
*   Computed assuming Pixar had been a C corporation since the beginning of
    those respective periods, and fully subject to federal and state income
    taxes.

**  Pro forma net income (loss) per share is not materially different from
    actual net income (loss) per share.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Superclick,   Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic  Report"),
I, Todd M. Pitcher,  Interim Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. the Periodic  Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly  presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  September 13, 2005               /s/ Todd M. Pitcher
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name  Todd M. Pitcher
                                         Title Interim Chief Financial Officer
                                               And Principle Accounting Officer
#### Hampton *vs.*Snipes.

CASE xxix

B. B. p. 83.

Defendant decreed _ to to complain-aa<i ^ rents.

It was decreed, that the defendant do forthwith execute titles to the complainant, in fee simple, for the house and lot mentioned in the pleadings: *That he account with hin before the master for what rent he has received on ac-court of the premises from the time he dispossessed the com-plai-uM of them,*(which it is referred to the master to state and report,) and that the costs of this suit be paid by the defendant.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 29, 2019

No. 04-19-00422-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.L., A CHILD,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-PA-01252

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal of the trial court’s June 4, 2019 order terminating appellant

Dad’s parental rights, Appellant’s brief was due to be filed with this court on August 8, 2019. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). After this court granted Dad’s first motion for extension of time to 

file the brief, it was due on August 28, 2019. On once-extended due date, Dad filed a second 

motion—for a five-day extension of time to file his brief.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on September 3, 2019. Any 

further motion for extension of time to file the brief is discouraged. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2 

(directing courts of appeals to dispose of parental rights termination suits “[w]ithin 180 days of 

the date the notice of appeal is filed”). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of August, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 10.16
                       NEW FORM OF CHANGE IN CONTROL

Michael Czinege

Rohan St. George

David L. Goebel

David R. Parsley

Carin Stutz

Stanley M. Sword

Rebecca R. Tilden