alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>










                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                          SHELBOURNE PROPERTIES I, INC.
                            FORM 10-Q MARCH 31, 2003


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelbourne Properties I Inc., (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.

Date:  May 14, 2003                                  /s/ Michael L. Ashner
         Michael L. Ashner                           ---------------------------
         Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 14, 2003                                  /s/ Carolyn B. Tiffany
         Carolyn B. Tiffany                          ---------------------------
         Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 12796-004]

                    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Ohio Ecological Services Field Office and West Virginia Field Office (FWS) requested a teleconference regarding Commission staff's March 11, 2015, request for formal consultation on the pink mucket pearly mussel (                    *Lampsilis abrupta*), eastern fanshell mussel (                    *Cyprogenia stegaria*), snuffbox mussel (                    *Epioblasma triquetra*), sheepnose mussel (                    *Plethobasus cyphyus*), and Indiana bat (                    *Myotis sodalis*) for the proposed R.C. Byrd Hydroelectric Project. The FWS requested a discussion of: (1) The Commission's hydropower licensing process; (2) the recent action listing the northern long-eared bat (                    *Myotis septentrionalis*) as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act; (3) FWS' information needs to complete section 7 consultation for listed bats and mussels; and (4) possible solutions to gathering the information needed by FWS.                

The teleconference will be held on Monday, April 20, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time). All local, state, and federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other interested parties are invited to participate by phone. Please call Andy Bernick at (202) 502-8660 by Monday, April 13, 2015, to RSVP and to receive specific instructions on how to participate.

Dated: April 3, 2015.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-08229 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Joe H. Martinez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-11-00904-CR

Trial court case number: 1289655

Trial court: 263rd District Court of Harris County

A supplemental clerk’s record that complies with our Order of Abatement has been filed. 

Accordingly, the appeal is reinstated. 

The record is complete, the briefs have been filed, and the case is set at issue.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 16, 2012
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Innovation,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marlene
  C. Schluter, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:                                                            | November
      12, 2004 | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | 
|                                                                 |                         | 
|/s//Marlene
      C. Schluter                                    |                        
|Marlene C. Schluter, Director,
      Principal Financial Officer |                        

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Airspan Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending September 28, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric Stonestrom, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

 

(1)    the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/ ERIC STONESTROM

Eric Stonestrom 

Chief Executive Officer 

November 12, 2003 

 

 

**A signedoriginal of this statements required by Section 906 has been provided to Airspan Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Airspan Networks, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
.'1. 
 Page 37 of 51
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S)1350

       (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of Dynegy
Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Bruce A. Williamson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: May 14, 2003

                                           /s/ Bruce A. Williamson
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Bruce A. Williamson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
J-A21003- 14

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court

. NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
LISA A. KETCHUM AND JEFFREY A. KETCHUM, H/W, AppellantS

v. GIANT FOOD STORES LLC, Appellee : : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 379 EDA 2014 Appeal from the Judgment Entered December, 17, 2013 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Civil Division at No(s): June Term, 2012 No. 002302 BEFORE: BOWES, OTT, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ. CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 I join the Majority Memorandum because it accurately sets forth Pennsylvania law. I write separately to reiterate what I have been ass erting for at least two decades - this law is fundamentally unfair to injur ed customers. Duff v.
Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. , No. GD- 01 -13235, 2002 WL 34098098 (Allegheny Cty. June 12, 2002) (Strassburger, J.); Landis v. Giant Eagle, Inc. , GD

91

– 7779, 142 PLJ 263 (1994) (Strassburger, J.), aff'd 440 Pa.Super. 658, 655 A.2d 1052 (1994) (unpublished memorandum).
As I noted in Duff : Where a customer has sustained injuries although neither the customer nor the store has behaved negligently, it woul d be more fair to hold the store responsible than to place t he risk on the consumer. Accidents such as these are foreseeable risks o f conducting this type of business, and commercial businesses a reJ-A21003- 14

- 2 -

in a far better financial position to absorb the cost b y spreading the risk among thousands of customers. Between these two innocent parties, fairness should require the store to pa y as a cost of operating its business.
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of In Full Affect,  Inc., on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003 as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Daniel L. Hodges, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(Team Agg of RI3250) 

2021 AFSAM

Combat Rifleman Team Match

RT3350 (agg of RI3250)

SHOOTER ROST # STATE\COUNTRY RI3250 TEAM SCORE 

1 ALL-GUARD ALPHA 1110- 64 Score - Vs 

1 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 118 277 18 AR - 2 SFC NOE, JOSEPH T 119 279 15 AR - 3 CPT MILLER, GARRETT E 117 282 21 AR - 4 SFC SWANSON, BRANDON N 100 272 10 WI - 2 ALL-GUARD (BRAVO) 1071- 52 Score - Vs 

1 SSG DEMENT, JERRY D 316 266 7 MO - 2 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 120 262 14 ND - 3 SFC BAUTISTA, MICHAEL R 125 260 15 ID - 4 SSG VARGAS, ERIK J 132 283 16 CA - 3 USAR GOLD 1062- 62 Score - Vs 

1 CW3 KNOTE, ANDY T 163 253 13 USAR - 2 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 160 259 12 USAR - 3 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 162 279 23 USAR - 4 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 161 271 14 USAR - 4 ALL-GUARD (CHARLIE) 1058- 54 Score - Vs 

1 SGT GRIFFETH, ALEXANDRA I 114 251 9 VA - 2 TSGT DANIEL, SCOTTY W 138 270 16 AR - 3 SSGT ROOK, GAVIN W 121 285 19 ND - 4 MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 108 252 10 UT - 5 USAR BLACK 1058- 49 Score - Vs 

1 SGT HUGHES, DEVIN E 158 271 19 USAR - 2 SFC GODEL, JASON W 156 251 10 USAR - 3 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 157 257 6 USAR - 4 SSG MORRIS, SEAN D 159 279 14 USAR - 6 AFSAM HONORS 954- 36 Score - Vs 

1 SGM MININO, ANTHONY A 167 236 5 USAR - 2 MSG BURDETTE, RODERICK II 165 238 8 USAR - 3 CSM BALL, MICHAEL E 166 210 5 USAR - 4 SSG ABEYTA, PATRICK M 164 270 18 USAR - Thursday, September 2, 2021 Page 1 of 1 Time printed: 18:38:59
aG

Life Cycle Cost Analysis

James E. McMahon

(JEMcMahon@LBL.gov)

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

U.S. DOE Workshop on Standards

for Distribution Transformers

November 1, 2000

11/01/00 1

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02GG
• Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis will consider

the tradeoff between increased purchase

price and decreased operating expenses for

more efficient designs compared to a

baseline.

• Total ownership cost (TOC) similarly

accounts for purchase and operating costs.

• Payback period is another expression of this

tradeoff.

11/01/00

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02GG
• INSTALLED OWNER COST:

the price paid by the purchaser for a

transformer

- installation costs will be included if they differ

with efficiency

• Possible data sources

- survey of current or recent purchase prices

- calculated =manufacturer costs plus markups

(manufacturer, distributor, installer)

11/01/00 3

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02GG
^zts: life Cycle Cost

r

• OPE^^ATING EXPENSE,

- energy and maintenance costs (annually)

- lifetime of the transformers (years)

- discount rate for calculating present value of

future operating expenses (e.g., 8% real)

• Possible approach and data sources

- annual energy consumption based on loading

- current and forecasted regional energy prices

- gather and analyze data on lifetimes, discount rates

11/01/00 4

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02GG
d

• LCC = P + [O/(1+r)t] where

+ P =Installed owner cost

+ 0 =Annual operating expense

+ r =Discount rate

+ t = years (sum over transformer lifetime)

11/01/00 5

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02GG
• LCC savings:

• LCC @ efficiency level above baseline - LCC @baseline

• Analyze a range of possible efficiency

improvements

• Efficiency levels corresponding to reduced

LCC (LCC savings) are generally considered

further

11/01/00 6

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02GG
EXAMPLE: LCC Results

aseline, and 3 efficiency options

Costs: fluorescent lamp ballasts (2F40 commercial)

Baseline

Cathode Cutout

q Electronic T12

q Electronic T8

Installed Annual energy Life cycle

11/01/00 7

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02GG
variability and UncertainC

• Objectives:

- Analysis of variability among purchasers and

operating conditions

- Rigorous treatment of uncertainty

• Technical Approach:

- Use distributions for each input, not point

estimates

- Commercial software

- User access via Web, training

11/01/00 8

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02GG
EXAMPILE (ballasts):

I.,CC savings with variatilit

k' :

0,000 Trials

.184 _, I 1841

0

Mean = $6

($150) ($75) $0 $75 $150

Certainty is 80.49% from $0 to +Infinity

11/01/00 9

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02GG
erpreting LCC -°sults

with van aG•iity

RESULTS

- Average LCC savings

- Percent with net savings (or with net cost)

• Importance analysis

- identify key inputs that contribute most to

uncertainty or variability

11/01/00 10

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 02GG
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CO REY LAVELL GRAHAM , Appel lant ,
v. Case No. 5 D 22

- 2666 LT Case No. 2013

- CF

- 045337

- A STATE O F F LORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed January 31, 2023 3. 800 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt for Brevard County , Tesha Ballou, Judge. Corey Lavell G raham, M ilton, pro se. No Appearanc e for Appellee.

PER CUR IAM. AFFIRMED. EDWARDS, EI SNAUGLE and EVA NDER, J J., c oncur.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)  August 3, 2004

MAGNUM HUNTER
RESOURCES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Nevada                                                         | 1-12508                 | 87-0462881                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ---------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (Commission File Number | (IRS Employer Identification No.)

600 East Las Colinas
Blvd., Suite 1100, Irving, Texas 75039(Address of principal
executive offices)        (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (972)
401-0752

(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)

Item 12. Results of Operations and
Financial Condition.

The
following information shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such a filing.

On
August 3, 2004, Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. reported its second quarter 2004 financial
results.

Item 7. Financial Statements and
Exhibits.

(c)
Exhibits

99.1 Press
Release, dated August 3, 2004.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

| | MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.BY:  /s/ Chris TongChris TongSr. Vice President and CFO
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:       August 3, 2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 5, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60628

Summary Calendar

 

VICTOR B. KEARLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J. STEWART PARRISH; JOHN DOES,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:03-CV-190-BN

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Victor B. Kearley, Mississippi prisoner #16946, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as

frivolous. Kearley’s claim that counsel’s actions in defending

him were done under color of state law, thereby making counsel

liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for ineffective assistance, is

without merit. Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312 (1981). Nor

has Kearley stated a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 conspiracy claim upon which
No. 03-60628

-2-

relief could be granted, as he has failed to plead the operative

facts upon which his claim is based. See Lynch v. Cannatella,

810 F.2d 1363, 1369-70 (5th Cir. 1987); see also Kane Enters. v.

MacGregor (USA) Inc., 322 F.3d 371, 374 (5th Cir. 2003).

Because Kearley did not allege in the district court that

the state public defender system was unconstitutional, this court

need not consider this claim. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder

Co., 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). Kearley’s argument that

the district judge lacked jurisdiction due to an administrative

order of reassignment to another judge is without merit. 

Kearley’s appeal is without merit and is therefore DISMISSED

as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal

as frivolous and the dismissal of the complaint by the district

court as frivolous both count as a strike for purposes of

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388

(5th Cir. 1996). Kearley is therefore CAUTIONED that once he

accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed in

forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

All outstanding motions are DENIED. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED; MOTIONS

DENIED.