S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 1 

## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 2 - 0 8 - 0 3 5 - CV
NI NA CI ULL A, I ND I VI DU ALL Y APPE L L AN TS A N D A S N EX T FRI EN D O F S AL VAT OR E CI UL L A, AN I NC AP AC I T AT E D P E R S ON A ND ANN CI UL L A, AS NE XTF R I E ND F O R N IC H O L E C IU L L A , E L I Z AB E T H C I UL L A AN D ANT HON Y CI UL L A, M I NOR C H I LDR EN V. STEV E HA W KI N S C U STO M A PPELL EE H O M ES, I N C . , A / K/A STEV E HAW K I NS CO NS T R UC T I ON C O M PA N Y, I N C . , A / K/A STEV E HA W KI NS BUI L DERS

----- ----- --

FR O M THE 141STDI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- --Th e am ended f i nal j udg m entst at es t hati t “speci f i cal l y does not di spose 2 ofan y ofPl ai nt i f f ’ s cl ai m s a g a i ns t. . . Pau l M os s, i ndi vi dua l l y a nd d/ b/ a Pa ul M o s s F ra m i n g .” 2 A ppel l ant s N i na C i ul l a, i ndi vi dual l y and as nextf r i end f orSal vat or e C i ul l a, an i ncapaci t at ed per son, and A nn C i u ll a , a s nextf r i end f orN i chol e C i ul l a, El i z abe t h Ci ul l a, an d Ant honyCi ul l a, m i nor chi l dr en, at t em pt t o a ppe al f r om a t r i al co urtor dergr ant i ng s um m ary j udgm enti n f avo rofA ppe l l ee St eveH aw ki ns C u s to m H o m e s , I n c ., a /k /a S te v e H a w k i n s C o n s tru c ti o n C o m p a n y , I n c ., a /k /a S tev e H a w k i n s B u i l d e rs. O n F e b rua ry 5 , 2 0 0 8 , w e n o ti fi e d A p p e l l a n ts th a t w e
w er e concer ned t hat t hi s cour t m ay not have j ur i sdi ct i on ov e r th is appeal bec aus e t he or der gr ant i ng su m m ary j udgm ent i n f avo r of St ev e H a w ki ns C u s to m H o m e s , In c ., a /k /a S te v e H a w k i n s C o n s tru c ti o n C o m p a n y , In c ., a /k /a St eveH aw ki ns Bui l der s i s a part i al s um m ary j udgm entt hatdoe s notdi sp os e o f
a l l p a rti e s i n th e c a s e , a n d i t d o e s n o t a p p e a r to b e a n a p p e a l a b l e i n te rl o c u to ry
o rd e r. See L ehm annv. Har- Con Cor p. , 3 9 S .W .3 d 1 9 1 , 1 9 2

– 9 3 (T e x . 2 0 0 1 ). W e n ot ed t hatA ppe l l a n ts’ s et t l em entoft hei rcl ai m s aga i ns tD avi d Hort on, in d iv id u a llya n d d /b /a D a v id H o rt o n F r a m in g , is re f le c t e d in t h e t r ia l c o u rt ’s A p r il 13, 2007 “ A m end ed Fi nal Jud gm entast o Pl ai nt i f f s and D avi d Hort on, I ndi vi dua l l y a n d d/ b/ a Davi d Hort on F r am i ng, ” butt hei rcl ai m s aga i ns tPau l M os s, i ndi vi dua l l y a nd d/ b/ a Paul M os s Fr am i ng, app ea r t o st i l l be pe ndi ng. W e 23

st at ed t h a tt h e a p p e a l wo u l d b e d i s mi s s e d f o rwa n to fj u r i s d i c t i o n u n l ess A ppel l ant s orany part y desi r i ng t o conti nue t he appeal f i l ed w i t hi n t en days a
r esponse show i ng gr oun ds f orcont i nui ng t he appeal ora copy ofa si gned or der
orj udg m entf i nal i zi ng t he case i n th e t r i al court . N o r esponse oraddi t i onal si gne d or derorj udgm entha s bee n f i l ed. T h e r e c o r d r e f le c t s t h a t A p p e lla n t s ’ c la im s a g a in s t P a u l M o s s , in d iv id u a lly and d/ b/ a Paul M os s Fr am i ng, hav e not yet bee n di sp os ed of . A c c o r di ngl y, bec au s e t h e r e i s n o f i n a l j u d g me n to ra p p e a l a b l e i n t e r l o c u t o r yo r d e r , i ti s t he opi ni on oft he cou rtt hat t hi s ca ses houl d be di sm i ss ed f orw antofj ur i sd i ct i on. S ee T EX . R. A PP . P . 4 2 .3 (a ); 4 3 .2 (f).

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL D : HO LM A N , G A RD N ER, an d W A LKER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: M a r c h 13, 2008