Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 19633 

and encourage foreign commerce, and 

for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant to 

qualified corporations the privilege of 

establishing foreign-trade zones in or 

adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection ports of entry; 

Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15 

CFR part 400) provide for the 

establishment of subzones for specific 

uses; 

Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zone of 

Southeast Texas, Inc., grantee of 

Foreign-Trade Zone 116, has made 

application to the Board to expand 

Subzone 116B on behalf of Total 

Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc., to 

include as Site 5 a pipeline that extends 

from the subzone’s Site 4 in Nederland 

to Site 1 in Port Arthur, Texas (FTZ 

Docket B–85–2014, docketed 11–25– 

2014); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment has been given in the Federal 

Register (79 FR 71831, 12–02–2014) and 

the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s memorandum, and finds that 

the requirements of the FTZ Act and the 

Board’s regulations are satisfied; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

approves the expansion of Subzone 

116B on behalf of Total Petrochemicals 

& Refining USA, Inc., as described in 

the application and Federal Register 

notice, subject to the FTZ Act and the 

Board’s regulations, including Section 

400.13. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of 

April 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate 

Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

ATTEST: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08456 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1975] 

Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 106 

Under Alternative Site Framework 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) (15 

CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the 

establishment or reorganization of 

zones; 

Whereas, the Port Authority of Greater 

Oklahoma City, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 106, submitted an 

application to the Board (FTZ Docket B– 

57–2014, docketed 08–12–2014) for 

authority to expand the zone under the 

ASF to include a new magnet site 

(proposed Site 18) in Shawnee, 

Oklahoma, adjacent to the Oklahoma 

City Customs and Border Protection port 

of entry; 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (79 FR 48117, 08–15–2014) and 

the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendation of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and the 

Board’s regulations are satisfied; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to expand FTZ 106 

under the ASF is approved, subject to 

the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, 

including section 400.13, to the Board’s 

standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 

the zone, and to an ASF sunset 

provision for magnet sites that would 

terminate authority for Site 18 if not 

activated within the initial seven years 

from the month of approval. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of 

April 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate 

Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

ATTEST: Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08457 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1968] 

Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 174 

Under Alternative Site Framework, 

Tucson, Arizona 

Pursuant to its authority under the 

Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 

1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), 

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the 

Board) adopts the following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) (15 

CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the 

establishment or reorganization of 

zones; 

Whereas, Tucson Regional Economic 

Opportunities, grantee of Foreign-Trade 

Zone 174, has applied to the Board (FTZ 

Docket B–35–2011, docketed 05/23/

2011, amended 05/21/2014) for 

authority to expand FTZ 174 under the 

ASF to include additional magnet sites, 

adjacent to the Tucson, Arizona U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection port of 

entry; 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (76 FR 30907, 05/27/2011 and 

79 FR 31297, 06/02/2014) and the 

application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendation of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and the 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, in part; 

Now, Therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize FTZ 174 

under the ASF is approved as it pertains 

to the Red Rock Industrial Park 

(designated as Site 8) and the Sunshine 

Industrial Park (designated as Site 9), 

subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations, including section 400.13, to 

the Board’s standard 2,000-acre 

activation limit for the zone, and to an 

ASF sunset provision for magnet sites 

that would terminate authority for Site 

8 and Site 9 if not activated within five 

years from the month of approval. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of 

April 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate 

Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08444 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–805] 

Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy 

Steel Pipe From Mexico: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 9, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

circular welded non-alloy steel pipe 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

19634 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 

1See Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel 

Pipe From Mexico: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 73034 (December 9, 

2014) (Preliminary Results). 

2See ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 

of Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from 

Mexico: Post-Preliminary Results Decision 

Memorandum,’’ dated January 30, 2015. 

3See Preliminary Results. 

4The Department initiated an administrative 

review of both Productos Laminados and Prolamsa, 

Inc. separately. However, record information 

indicates that Prolamsa, Inc. is a wholly-owned U.S. 

subsidiary of Productos Laminados, and is an 

importer, not a producer, of subject merchandise. 

Also, during the course of this review, Productos 

Laminados submitted consolidated responses on 

behalf of itself and Prolamsa, Inc. For purposes of 

this Federal Register notice, references to Prolamsa 

pertain to Productos Laminados and Prolamsa, Inc. 

collectively. Otherwise, the two entities are 

referenced separately, where appropriate. 

5See Preliminary Results. 

6On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA Access’’) changed to AD and 

CVD Centralized Electronic Service System 

(‘‘ACCESS’’). The Web site location also changed 

from http://iaaccess.rade.gov to http://

access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing the 

references to the Regulations can be found at 79 FR 

69046 (November 20, 2014). 

from Mexico.1 The Department issued 

post-preliminary results of this 

administrative review on January 30, 

2015 (Post-Preliminary Results).2 Also, 

as a result of our partial rescission of 

this review, as discussed in the 

Preliminary Results, Productos 

Laminados, S.A. de C.V. (Productos 

Laminados) is the sole remaining 

respondent.3 4 The period of review 

(POR) is November 1, 2012, through 

October 31, 2013. 

Only one party submitted a case brief. 

No interested party submitted rebuttal 

briefs. Based on our analysis of the 

comment received, we made no changes 

to the margin calculations. Therefore, 

the final results of review do not differ 

from the Post-Preliminary Results. The 

final dumping margin is listed in the 

section below entitled, ‘‘Final Results of 

Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Davina Friedmann or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VI, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0698 and (202) 

482–0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 9, 2014, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary results of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain circular welded non-alloy 

steel pipe from Mexico for the period 

November 1, 2012, through October 31, 

2013.5

During this administrative review, the 

Department also conducted a concurrent 

scope review. As indicated in the final 

scope ruling, the Department found that 

certain black, circular tubing produced 

to ASTM A–513 by Productos 

Laminados meets the exclusion 

language for mechanical tubing in the 

scope of this antidumping duty order. 

Pursuant to the final scope ruling, the 

Department instructed Productos 

Laminados to submit a revised U.S. 

sales database incorporating the factors 

set forth in the scope ruling. Productos 

Laminados submitted its revised U.S. 

sales database on January 5, 2014. 

Consequently, on January 30, 2015, the 

Department issued the Post-Preliminary 

Results. The Department also placed on 

the record of this review the following 

memorandum: ‘‘Productos Laminados 

de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. and 

Prolamsa, Inc.—Analysis Memorandum 

for the Post-Preliminary Results of the 

2012/2013 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Circular 

Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from 

Mexico’’, dated January 30, 2015 (PostPreliminary Analysis Memo). Together, 

these memoranda explain the changes 

made to the Preliminary Results, 

yielding the revised margin for the postpreliminary results of review. 

In response to the Department’s 

invitation to comment on the 

preliminary and post-preliminary 

results of this review, one party, 

Prolamsa, filed a case brief on February 

9, 2015. No rebuttal briefs were 

submitted to the Department. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

circular welded non-alloy steel pipes 

and tubes. The merchandise covered by 

the order and subject to this review is 

currently classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) at subheadings: 7306.30.1000, 

7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 

7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 

7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, our written description of the 

scope of this proceeding is dispositive. 

A full description of the scope of the 

order is contained in the memorandum 

from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of 

the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Certain Circular Welded NonAlloy Steel Pipe from Mexico; 2012– 

2013’’ (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum), which is hereby 

adopted by this notice and incorporated 

herein by reference. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS).6 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov and available to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed 

Issues and Decision Memorandum and 

electronic versions of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by interested parties 

in this administrative review are listed 

as an attachment to this notice. We have 

analyzed all interested party comments. 

Based on our analysis of the comments 

received, the margin in the final results 

is unchanged from that presented in the 

Post-Preliminary Results. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine the following weightedaverage margin exists for the period 

November 1, 2012, through October 31, 

2013: 

Manufacturer/Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percent) 

Productos Laminados ............... 7.33 

Assessment 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 356.8(a), the Department intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

41 days after the date of publication of 

these final results of review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 19635 

7See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe 

From Mexico, 57 FR 42953 (September 17, 1992). 

1See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From Taiwan; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013, 79 FR 60449 (October 7, 2014) (Preliminary 

Results). 

2See the January 15, 2015, memorandum to Gary 

Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations 

through Irene Darzenta Tzafolias, Acting Director, 

Office II from David Crespo, Senior International 

Trade Compliance Analyst, entitled ‘‘Narrow 

Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.’’ 

3See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic 

of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 

FR 56982 (Sept. 17, 2010) (Order). 

4For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see the memorandum from James P. Maeder, 

Senior Director, Office I, Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. 

Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Continued 

publication date of these final results of 

administrative review, consistent with 

section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash 

deposit rate for Productos Laminados 

will be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this review, which is listed 

above; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not 

participating in this review, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate established from 

a completed segment of this proceeding 

for the most recent review period; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 32.62 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.7 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APOs) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 8, 2015. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of the Order 

Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: The Department Should Grant a 

CEP Offset Adjustment to Normal Value 

Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–08430 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–844] 

Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From Taiwan; Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 7, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the Preliminary 

Results of the third administrative 

review of the antidumping duty (AD) 

order on narrow woven ribbons with 

woven selvedge (NWR) from Taiwan.1

The review covers two producers/

exporters of the subject merchandise: 

King Young Enterprise Co., Ltd. and its 

affiliates, Ethel Enterprise Co., Ltd. and 

Glory Young Enterprise Co., Ltd., 

(collectively, King Young); and Hen Hao 

Trading Co. Ltd. a.k.a. Taiwan Tulip 

Ribbons and Braids Co. Ltd. (Hen Hao). 

The period of review (POR) is 

September 1, 2012, through August 31, 

2013. We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Results and, based upon our 

analysis of the comments, we continue 

to find that sales of subject merchandise 

to the United States have been made at 

prices below normal value (NV). The 

final dumping margins for the reviewed 

companies are listed below in the 

section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the 

Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective date: April 13, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Crespo or Alice Maldonado, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3693 and (202) 

482–4682, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 7, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results in the 

Federal Register. The Department 

conducted a sales verification of King 

Young at its offices in Taiwan from 

September 29 through October 3, 2014, 

and a cost verification from November 

12 through 16, 2014. In January 2015, 

we received case briefs from Berwick 

Offray LLC and its wholly-owned 

subsidiary Lion Ribbon Company, Inc. 

(the petitioner), King Young, and Morex 

Ribbon Corp. and Papillon Ribbon & 

Bow Inc., importers of subject 

merchandise. Also in January 2015, we 

received rebuttal briefs from the 

petitioner and King Young. On January 

15, 2015, the Department postponed the 

final results by 60 days.2 The 

Department has conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to this 

order 3 covers narrow woven ribbons 

with woven selvedge. The merchandise 

subject to this order is classifiable under 

the harmonized tariff schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) statistical 

categories 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030; 

5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject 

merchandise also may enter under 

subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20; 

5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00; 

5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10; 

5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80 

and under statistical categories 

5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080; 

5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. The 

HTSUS statistical categories and 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes; 

however, the written description of the 

merchandise covered by this order is 

dispositive.4

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES