# Patent

## Title
Wireless energy transfer in lossy environments

## Abstract

Described herein are improved configurations for a wireless power transfer for electronic devices that include at least one source magnetic resonator including a capacitively-loaded conducting loop coupled to a power source and configured to generate an oscillating magnetic field and at least one device magnetic resonator, distal from said source resonators, comprising a capacitively-loaded conducting loop configured to convert said oscillating magnetic fields into electrical energy, wherein at least one said resonator has a keep-out zone around the resonator that surrounds the resonator with a layer of non-lossy material.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims the benefit of the following U.S. Provisional Application, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety: U.S. App. No. 61/152,390 filed Feb. 13, 2009.
This application is a continuation-in-part U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/567,716 filed Sep. 25, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/567,716 claims the benefit of the following U.S. Patent Applications, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety; U.S. App. No. 61/100,721 filed Sep. 27, 2008; U.S. App. No. 61/108,743 filed Oct. 27, 2008; U.S. App. No. 61/147,386 filed Jan. 26, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/152,086 filed Feb. 12, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/178,508 filed May 15, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/182,768 filed Jun. 1, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/121,159 filed Dec. 9, 2008; U.S. App. No. 61/142,977 filed Jan. 7, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/142,885 filed Jan. 6, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/142,796 filed Jan. 6, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/142,889 filed Jan. 6, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/142,880 filed Jan. 6, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/142,818 filed Jan. 6, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/142,887 filed Jan. 6, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/156,764 filed Mar. 2, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/143,058 filed Jan. 7, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/163,695 filed Mar. 26, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/172,633 filed Apr. 24, 2009; U.S. App. No. 61/169,240 filed Apr. 14, 2009, and U.S. App. No. 61/173,747 filed Apr. 29, 2009.
This application is a continuation-in-part of the following U.S. Patent Applications, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/639,489 filed Dec. 16, 2009; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/647,705 filed Dec. 28, 2009.


BACKGROUND
Field
This disclosure relates to wireless energy transfer, also referred to as wireless power transmission.
Description of the Related Art
Energy or power may be transferred wirelessly using a variety of known radiative, or far-field, and non-radiative, or near-field, techniques. For example, radiative wireless information transfer using low-directionality antennas, such as those used in radio and cellular communications systems and home computer networks, may be considered wireless energy transfer. However, this type of radiative transfer is very inefficient because only a tiny portion of the supplied or radiated power, namely, that portion in the direction of, and overlapping with, the receiver is picked up. The vast majority of the power is radiated away in all the other directions and lost in free space. Such inefficient power transfer may be acceptable for data transmission, but is not practical for transferring useful amounts of electrical energy for the purpose of doing work, such as for powering or charging electrical devices. One way to improve the transfer efficiency of some radiative energy transfer schemes is to use directional antennas to confine and preferentially direct the radiated energy towards a receiver. However, these directed radiation schemes may require an uninterruptible line-of-sight and potentially complicated tracking and steering mechanisms in the case of mobile transmitters and/or receivers. In addition, such schemes may pose hazards to objects or people that cross or intersect the beam when modest to high amounts of power are being transmitted. A known non-radiative, or near-field, wireless energy transfer scheme, often referred to as either induction or traditional induction, does not (intentionally) radiate power, but uses an oscillating current passing through a primary coil, to generate an oscillating magnetic near-field that induces currents in a near-by receiving or secondary coil. Traditional induction schemes have demonstrated the transmission of modest to large amounts of power, however only over very short distances, and with very small offset tolerances between the primary power supply unit and the secondary receiver unit. Electric transformers and proximity chargers are examples of devices that utilize this known short range, near-field energy transfer scheme.
Therefore a need exists for a wireless power transfer scheme that is capable of transferring useful amounts of electrical power over mid-range distances or alignment offsets. Such a wireless power transfer scheme should enable useful energy transfer over greater distances and alignment offsets than those realized with traditional induction schemes, but without the limitations and risks inherent in radiative transmission schemes.
SUMMARY
There is disclosed herein a non-radiative or near-field wireless energy transfer scheme that is capable of transmitting useful amounts of power over mid-range distances and alignment offsets. This inventive technique uses coupled electromagnetic resonators with long-lived oscillatory resonant modes to transfer power from a power supply to a power drain. The technique is general and may be applied to a wide range of resonators, even where the specific examples disclosed herein relate to electromagnetic resonators. If the resonators are designed such that the energy stored by the electric field is primarily confined within the structure and that the energy stored by the magnetic field is primarily in the region surrounding the resonator. Then, the energy exchange is mediated primarily by the resonant magnetic near-field. These types of resonators may be referred to as magnetic resonators. If the resonators are designed such that the energy stored by the magnetic field is primarily confined within the structure and that the energy stored by the electric field is primarily in the region surrounding the resonator. Then, the energy exchange is mediated primarily by the resonant electric near-field. These types of resonators may be referred to as electric resonators. Either type of resonator may also be referred to as an electromagnetic resonator. Both types of resonators are disclosed herein.
The omni-directional but stationary (non-lossy) nature of the near-fields of the resonators we disclose enables efficient wireless energy transfer over mid-range distances, over a wide range of directions and resonator orientations, suitable for charging, powering, or simultaneously powering and charging a variety of electronic devices. As a result, a system may have a wide variety of possible applications where a first resonator, connected to a power source, is in one location, and a second resonator, potentially connected to electrical/electronic devices, batteries, powering or charging circuits, and the like, is at a second location, and where the distance from the first resonator to the second resonator is on the order of centimeters to meters. For example, a first resonator connected to the wired electricity grid could be placed on the ceiling of a room, while other resonators connected to devices, such as robots, vehicles, computers, communication devices, medical devices, and the like, move about within the room, and where these devices are constantly or intermittently receiving power wirelessly from the source resonator. From this one example, one can imagine many applications where the systems and methods disclosed herein could provide wireless power across mid-range distances, including consumer electronics, industrial applications, infrastructure power and lighting, transportation vehicles, electronic games, military applications, and the like.
Energy exchange between two electromagnetic resonators can be optimized when the resonators are tuned to substantially the same frequency and when the losses in the system are minimal. Wireless energy transfer systems may be designed so that the “coupling-time” between resonators is much shorter than the resonators' “loss-times”. Therefore, the systems and methods described herein may utilize high quality factor (high-Q) resonators with low intrinsic-loss rates. In addition, the systems and methods described herein may use sub-wavelength resonators with near-fields that extend significantly longer than the characteristic sizes of the resonators, so that the near-fields of the resonators that exchange energy overlap at mid-range distances. This is a regime of operation that has not been practiced before and that differs significantly from traditional induction designs.
It is important to appreciate the difference between the high-Q magnetic resonator scheme disclosed here and the known close-range or proximity inductive schemes, namely, that those known schemes do not conventionally utilize high-Q resonators. Using coupled-mode theory (CMT), (see, for example, Waves and Fields in Optoelectronics, H. A. Haus, Prentice Hall, 1984), one may show that a high-Q resonator-coupling mechanism can enable orders of magnitude more efficient power delivery between resonators spaced by mid-range distances than is enabled by traditional inductive schemes. Coupled high-Q resonators have demonstrated efficient energy transfer over mid-range distances and improved efficiencies and offset tolerances in short range energy transfer applications.
The systems and methods described herein may provide for near-field wireless energy transfer via strongly coupled high-Q resonators, a technique with the potential to transfer power levels from picowatts to kilowatts, safely, and over distances much larger than have been achieved using traditional induction techniques. Efficient energy transfer may be realized for a variety of general systems of strongly coupled resonators, such as systems of strongly coupled acoustic resonators, nuclear resonators, mechanical resonators, and the like, as originally described by researchers at M.I.T. in their publications, “Efficient wireless non-radiative mid-range energy transfer”, Annals of Physics, vol. 323, Issue 1, p. 34 (2008) and “Wireless Power Transfer via Strongly Coupled Magnetic Resonances”, Science, vol. 317, no. 5834, p. 83, (2007). Disclosed herein are electromagnetic resonators and systems of coupled electromagnetic resonators, also referred to more specifically as coupled magnetic resonators and coupled electric resonators, with operating frequencies below 10 GHz.
This disclosure describes wireless energy transfer technologies, also referred to as wireless power transmission technologies. Throughout this disclosure, we may use the terms wireless energy transfer, wireless power transfer, wireless power transmission, and the like, interchangeably. We may refer to supplying energy or power from a source, an AC or DC source, a battery, a source resonator, a power supply, a generator, a solar panel, and thermal collector, and the like, to a device, a remote device, to multiple remote devices, to a device resonator or resonators, and the like. We may describe intermediate resonators that extend the range of the wireless energy transfer system by allowing energy to hop, transfer through, be temporarily stored, be partially dissipated, or for the transfer to be mediated in any way, from a source resonator to any combination of other device and intermediate resonators, so that energy transfer networks, or strings, or extended paths may be realized. Device resonators may receive energy from a source resonator, convert a portion of that energy to electric power for powering or charging a device, and simultaneously pass a portion of the received energy onto other device or mobile device resonators. Energy may be transferred from a source resonator to multiple device resonators, significantly extending the distance over which energy may be wirelessly transferred. The wireless power transmission systems may be implemented using a variety of system architectures and resonator designs. The systems may include a single source or multiple sources transmitting power to a single device or multiple devices. The resonators may be designed to be source or device resonators, or they may be designed to be repeaters. In some cases, a resonator may be a device and source resonator simultaneously, or it may be switched from operating as a source to operating as a device or a repeater. One skilled in the art will understand that a variety of system architectures may be supported by the wide range of resonator designs and functionalities described in this application.
In the wireless energy transfer systems we describe, remote devices may be powered directly, using the wirelessly supplied power or energy, or the devices may be coupled to an energy storage unit such as a battery, a super-capacitor, an ultra-capacitor, or the like (or other kind of power drain), where the energy storage unit may be charged or recharged wirelessly, and/or where the wireless power transfer mechanism is simply supplementary to the main power source of the device. The devices may be powered by hybrid battery/energy storage devices such as batteries with integrated storage capacitors and the like. Furthermore, novel battery and energy storage devices may be designed to take advantage of the operational improvements enabled by wireless power transmission systems.
Other power management scenarios include using wirelessly supplied power to recharge batteries or charge energy storage units while the devices they power are turned off, in an idle state, in a sleep mode, and the like. Batteries or energy storage units may be charged or recharged at high (fast) or low (slow) rates. Batteries or energy storage units may be trickle charged or float charged. Multiple devices may be charged or powered simultaneously in parallel or power delivery to multiple devices may be serialized such that one or more devices receive power for a period of time after which other power delivery is switched to other devices. Multiple devices may share power from one or more sources with one or more other devices either simultaneously, or in a time multiplexed manner, or in a frequency multiplexed manner, or in a spatially multiplexed manner, or in an orientation multiplexed manner, or in any combination of time and frequency and spatial and orientation multiplexing. Multiple devices may share power with each other, with at least one device being reconfigured continuously, intermittently, periodically, occasionally, or temporarily, to operate as wireless power sources. It would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that there are a variety of ways to power and/or charge devices, and the variety of ways could be applied to the technologies and applications described herein.
Wireless energy transfer has a variety of possible applications including for example, placing a source (e.g. one connected to the wired electricity grid) on the ceiling, under the floor, or in the walls of a room, while devices such as robots, vehicles, computers, PDAs or similar are placed or move freely within the room. Other applications may include powering or recharging electric-engine vehicles, such as buses and/or hybrid cars and medical devices, such as wearable or implantable devices. Additional example applications include the ability to power or recharge autonomous electronics (e.g. laptops, cell-phones, portable music players, household robots, GPS navigation systems, displays, etc), sensors, industrial and manufacturing equipment, medical devices and monitors, home appliances and tools (e.g. lights, fans, drills, saws, heaters, displays, televisions, counter-top appliances, etc.), military devices, heated or illuminated clothing, communications and navigation equipment, including equipment built into vehicles, clothing and protective-wear such as helmets, body armor and vests, and the like, and the ability to transmit power to physically isolated devices such as to implanted medical devices, to hidden, buried, implanted or embedded sensors or tags, to and/or from roof-top solar panels to indoor distribution panels, and the like.
In one aspect, disclosed herein is a system including a source resonator having a Q-factor Q1 and a characteristic sizex1, coupled to a power generator with direct electrical connections; and a second resonator having a Q-factor Q2 and a characteristic size x2, coupled to a load with direct electrical connections, and located a distance D from the source resonator, wherein the source resonator and the second resonator are coupled to exchange energy wirelessly among the source resonator and the second resonator in order to transmit power from the power generator to the load, and wherein √{square root over (Q1Q2)} is greater than 100.
Q1 may be greater than 100 and Q2 may be less than 100. Q1 may be greater than 100 and Q2 may be greater than 100. A useful energy exchange may be maintained over an operating distance from 0 to D, where D is larger than the smaller of x1 and x2. At least one of the source resonator and the second resonator may be a coil of at least one turn of a conducting material connected to a first network of capacitors. The first network of capacitors may include at least one tunable capacitor. The direct electrical connections of at least one of the source resonator to the ground terminal of the power generator and the second resonator to the ground terminal of the load may be made at a point on an axis of electrical symmetry of the first network of capacitors. The first network of capacitors may include at least one tunable butterfly-type capacitor, wherein the direct electrical connection to the ground terminal is made on a center terminal of the at least one tunable butterfly-type capacitor. The direct electrical connection of at least one of the source resonator to the power generator and the second resonator to the load may be made via a second network of capacitors, wherein the first network of capacitors and the second network of capacitors form an impedance matching network. The impedance matching network may be designed to match the coil to a characteristic impedance of the power generator or the load at a driving frequency of the power generator.
At least one of the first network of capacitors and the second network of capacitors may include at least one tunable capacitor. The first network of capacitors and the second network of capacitors may be adjustable to change an impedance of the impedance matching network at a driving frequency of the power generator. The first network of capacitors and the second network of capacitors may be adjustable to match the coil to the characteristic impedance of the power generator or the load at a driving frequency of the power generator. At least one of the first network of capacitors and the second network of capacitors may include at least one fixed capacitor that reduces a voltage across the at least one tunable capacitor. The direct electrical connections of at least one of the source resonator to the power generator and the second resonator to the load may be configured to substantially preserve a resonant mode. At least one of the source resonator and the second resonator may be a tunable resonator. The source resonator may be physically separated from the power generator and the second resonator may be physically separated from the load. The second resonator may be coupled to a power conversion circuit to deliver DC power to the load. The second resonator may be coupled to a power conversion circuit to deliver AC power to the load. The second resonator may be coupled to a power conversion circuit to deliver both AC and DC power to the load. The second resonator may be coupled to a power conversion circuit to deliver power to a plurality of loads.
In another aspect, a system disclosed herein includes a source resonator having a Q-factor Q1 and a characteristic size x1, and a second resonator having a Q-factor Q2 and a characteristic size x2, and located a distance D from the source resonator; wherein the source resonator and the second resonator are coupled to exchange energy wirelessly among the source resonator and the second resonator; and wherein √{square root over (Q1Q2)} is greater than 100, and wherein at least one of the resonators is enclosed in a low loss tangent material.
In another aspect, a system disclosed herein includes a source resonator having a Q-factor Q1 and a characteristic size x1, and a second resonator having a Q-factor Q2 and a characteristic size x2, and located a distance D from the source resonator; wherein the source resonator and the second resonator are coupled to exchange energy wirelessly among the source resonator and the second resonator, and wherein √{square root over (Q1Q2)} is greater than 100; and wherein at least one of the resonators includes a coil of a plurality of turns of a conducting material connected to a network of capacitors, wherein the plurality of turns are in a common plane, and wherein a characteristic thickness of the at least one of the resonators is much less than a characteristic size of the at least one of the resonators.
Throughout this disclosure we may refer to the certain circuit components such as capacitors, inductors, resistors, diodes, switches and the like as circuit components or elements. We may also refer to series and parallel combinations of these components as elements, networks, topologies, circuits, and the like. We may describe combinations of capacitors, diodes, varactors, transistors, and/or switches as adjustable impedance networks, tuning networks, matching networks, adjusting elements, and the like. We may also refer to “self-resonant” objects that have both capacitance, and inductance distributed (or partially distributed, as opposed to solely lumped) throughout the entire object. It would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that adjusting and controlling variable components within a circuit or network may adjust the performance of that circuit or network and that those adjustments may be described generally as tuning, adjusting, matching, correcting, and the like. Other methods to tune or adjust the operating point of the wireless power transfer system may be used alone, or in addition to adjusting tunable components such as inductors and capacitors, or banks of inductors and capacitors.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. In case of conflict with publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned or incorporated herein by reference, the present specification, including definitions, will control.
Any of the features described above may be used, alone or in combination, without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Other features, objects, and advantages of the systems and methods disclosed herein will be apparent from the following detailed description and figures.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B depict exemplary wireless power systems containing a source resonator and device resonator separated by a distance.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram that shows an exemplary resonator.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram that shows an exemplary resonator in the presence of a “loading” object.
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram that shows an exemplary resonator in the presence of a “perturbing” object.
FIG. 5 is a plot of efficiency, η, vs. strong coupling factor, U=κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}=k√{square root over (QsQd)}.
FIG. 6A is a schematic circuit diagram of one example of a resonator; FIG. 6B is a schematic diagram that shows one example of a capacitively-loaded inductor loop magnetic resonator; FIG. 6C is a schematic diagram that shows a self-resonant coil with distributed capacitance and inductance; FIG. 6D is a schematic diagram that shows electric and magnetic field lines associated with an exemplary magnetic resonator; and FIG. 6E is a schematic diagram that shows one example of an electric resonator.
FIG. 7 is a plot of the “quality factor”, Q (solid line), as a function of frequency, for an exemplary resonator that may be used for wireless power transmission at MHz frequencies.
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram that shows a resonator structure with its characteristic size, thickness and width indicated.
FIG. 9A and FIG. 9B are schematic diagrams that show exemplary inductive loop elements.
FIG. 10A and FIG. 10B are schematic diagrams that show two examples of trace structures formed on printed circuit boards and used to realize the inductive element in magnetic resonator structures.
FIG. 11A is a schematic diagram that shows a perspective view of a planar magnetic resonator; FIG. 11B is a schematic diagram that shows a perspective view of a two planar magnetic resonator with various geometries; and FIG. 11C is a schematic diagram that shows a perspective view of a two planar magnetic resonators separated by a distance D.
FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram showing a perspective view of an example of a planar magnetic resonator.
FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram showing a perspective view of a planar magnetic resonator arrangement with a circular resonator coil.
FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram showing a perspective view of an active area of a planar magnetic resonator.
FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram showing an application of the wireless power transfer system with a source at the center of a table powering several devices placed around the source.
FIG. 16A is a schematic diagram that shows a 3D finite element model of a copper and magnetic material structure driven by a square loop of current around the choke point at its center; and FIG. 16B is a schematic diagram that shows the interaction, as indicated by the calculated magnetic field streamlines, between two of the structures shown in FIG. 16A.
FIG. 17 is a schematic diagram that shows an equivalent circuit representation of a magnetic resonator including a conducting wire wrapped N times around a structure, possibly containing magnetically permeable material.
FIG. 18 is a plot that shows a Finite Element Method (FEM) simulation of two high conductivity surfaces above and below a disk composed of lossy dielectric material, in an external magnetic field of frequency 6.78 MHz.
FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram that shows a magnetic resonator with a lossy object in its vicinity completely covered by a high-conductivity surface.
FIG. 20 is a schematic diagram that shows a magnetic resonator with a lossy object in its vicinity partially covered by a high-conductivity surface.
FIG. 21 is a schematic diagram that shows a magnetic resonator with a lossy object in its vicinity placed on top of a high-conductivity surface.
FIG. 22 is a schematic diagram that shows a completely wireless projector.
FIG. 23 is a set of plots that show the magnitude of the electric and magnetic fields along a line that contains the diameter of a circular loop inductor and along the axis of the loop inductor.
FIG. 24A is a schematic diagram that shows a magnetic resonator and its enclosure along with a necessary but lossy object placed in the corner of the enclosure, as far away from the resonator structure as possible; and FIG. 24B is a schematic diagram that shows a magnetic resonator and its enclosure along with a necessary but loss object placed in the center of the surface enclosed by the inductive element in the magnetic resonator.
FIG. 25 is a schematic diagram that shows a magnetic resonator with a high-conductivity surface above it and a lossy object, which may be brought into the vicinity of the resonator, but above the high-conductivity sheet.
FIG. 26A shows an axially symmetric FEM simulation of a thin conducting (copper) cylinder or disk (20 cm in diameter, 2 cm in height) exposed to an initially uniform, externally applied magnetic field (gray flux lines) along the z-axis; and FIG. 26B shows the same structure and externally applied field as in FIG. 26A, except that the conducting cylinder has been modified to include a 0.25 mm layer of magnetic material (not visible) with μ′r=40, on its outside surface.
FIG. 27 is a schematic diagram that shows an axially-symmetric view of a variation of the system shown in FIG. 26A and FIG. 26B, in which only one surface of the lossy material is covered by a layered structure of copper and magnetic materials.
FIG. 28A is a schematic diagram that shows a matching circuit including an indirect coupling to a high-Q inductive element.
FIG. 28B is a schematic diagram that shows a magnetic resonator that includes a conductor loop inductor and a tunable impedance network.
FIG. 28C is a schematic diagram that shows a matching circuit directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element.
FIG. 28D is a schematic diagram that shows symmetric matching circuit directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and driven anti-symmetrically (balanced drive).
FIG. 28E is a schematic diagram that shows a matching circuit directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and connected to ground at a point of symmetry of the main resonator (unbalanced drive).
FIG. 29A and FIG. 29B are schematic diagrams that show two matching circuits transformer-coupled (i.e. indirectly or inductively) to a high-Q inductive element; FIG. 29C is a Smith chart that shows the complex impedances (arising from L and R of the inductive element) that may be matched to an arbitrary real impedance Z0 by the matching circuit of FIG. 29B in the case ωL2=1/ωC2.
FIGS. 30A-30F are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including capacitors in series with Z0. FIG. 30G is a Smith chart showing the complex impedances that may be matched by the matching circuits of FIGS. 30A-30F. FIGS. 30H-30M are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including inductors in series with Z0.
FIGS. 31A-31C are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including capacitors in series with Z0. FIG. 31D is a Smith chart showing the complex impedances that may be matched by the matching circuits of FIGS. 31A-31C. FIGS. 31E-31G are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including inductors in series with Z0.
FIGS. 32A-32C are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including capacitors in series with Z0. FIG. 32D is a Smith chart showing complex impedances that may be matched by the matching circuits of FIGS. 32A-32C. FIGS. 32E-32G are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including inductors in series with Z0.
FIGS. 33A-33F are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including capacitors in parallel with Zo. FIG. 33G is a Smith chart showing the complex impedances that may be matched by the matching circuits of FIGS. 33A-33F. FIGS. 33H-33M are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including inductors in parallel with Zo.
FIGS. 34A-34C are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including capacitors in parallel with Z0. FIG. 34D is a Smith chart showing the complex impedances that may be matched by the matching circuits of FIGS. 34A-34C. FIGS. 34E-34G are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including inductors in parallel with Z0.
FIGS. 35A-35C are schematic diagrams that show matching circuits directly coupled to a high-Q inductive element and including capacitors in parallel with Z0. FIGS. 35D-35F are Smith charts showing the complex impedances that may be matched by the matching circuits of FIGS. 35A-35C, respectively.
FIGS. 36A-36D are schematic diagrams of networks of fixed and variable capacitors designed to produce an overall variable capacitance with finer tuning resolution and some with reduced voltage on the variable capacitor.
FIGS. 37A and 37B are schematic diagrams that show networks of fixed capacitors and a variable inductor designed to produce an overall variable capacitance.
FIG. 38 is a schematic diagram that shows a wireless power transmission system.
FIG. 39 is a schematic diagram that shows an exemplary wirelessly powered device.
FIG. 40 is a schematic diagram that shows the source of an exemplary wireless power transfer system.
FIG. 41 is a schematic diagram of a magnetic resonator that includes port parameter measurement circuitry that may be configured to measure certain electrical signals and may measure the magnitude and phase of signals.
FIG. 42 is a schematic diagram of a magnetic resonator where the tunable impedance network is realized with voltage controlled capacitors.
FIG. 43 is a schematic diagram that shows an end-to-end wireless power transmission system in which both the source and the device contain port measurement circuitry and a processor.
FIG. 44 is a schematic diagram that shows an end-to-end wireless power transmission system in which only the source contains port measurement circuitry and a processor.
FIG. 45 is a schematic diagram that shows an end-to-end wireless power transmission system in which both the source and the device contain port measurement circuitry but only the source contains a processor.
FIG. 46 is a schematic diagram that shows an end-to-end wireless power transmission system in which only the source contains port measurement circuitry and a processor.
FIG. 47 is a schematic diagram that shows coupled magnetic resonators whose frequency and impedance may be automatically adjusted using algorithms implemented using a processor or a computer.
FIG. 48 is a schematic diagram that shows a varactor array.
FIG. 49 is a schematic diagram that shows a device (laptop computer) being wirelessly powered or charged by a source, where both the source and device resonator are physically separated from, but electrically connected to, the source and device.
FIG. 50A is a schematic diagram that shows a wirelessly powered or charged laptop application where the device resonator is inside the laptop case and is not visible.
FIG. 50B is a schematic diagram that shows a wirelessly powered or charged laptop application where the resonator is underneath the laptop base and is electrically connected to the laptop power input by an electrical cable.
FIG. 50C is a schematic diagram that shows a wirelessly powered or charged laptop application where the resonator is attached to the laptop base.
FIG. 50D is a schematic diagram that shows a wirelessly powered or charged laptop application where the resonator is attached to the laptop display.
FIG. 51 is a schematic diagram that shows rooftop PV panels with wireless power transfer.
FIG. 52A is a schematic diagram showing routing of individual traces in four layers of a layered PCB; FIG. 52B is a schematic diagram showing routing of individual traces and via connections.
FIG. 53A is a schematic diagram showing routing of individual traces in four layers of a layered PCB with one of the individual traces highlighted to show its path through the layer; FIG. 53B is a schematic diagram showing routing of conductor traces and via connection with one of the conductor traces highlighted to show its path through the layers for the stranded trace.
FIG. 54A and FIG. 54B are a schematic diagrams showing examples of alternative routing of individual traces.
FIG. 55 is a schematic diagram showing routing of individual traces in one layer of a PCB.
FIG. 56 is a schematic diagram showing routing direction between conducting layers of a PCB.
FIG. 57 is a schematic diagram showing sharing of via space of two stranded traces routed next to each other.
FIGS. 58A-58D are schematic diagrams showing cross-sectional views of stranded traces in PCBs with various feature sizes and aspect ratios.
FIG. 59A is a plot of wireless power transfer efficiency between a fixed size device resonator and differently sized source resonators as a function of separation distance; and FIG. 59B is a schematic diagram of the resonator configuration used for generating the plot in FIG. 59A.
FIG. 60A is a plot of wireless power transfer efficiency between a fixed size device resonator and differently sized source resonators as a function of lateral offset; and FIG. 60B is a schematic diagram of the resonator configuration used for generating the plot in FIG. 60A.
FIG. 61 is a schematic diagram of a conductor arrangement of an exemplary system embodiment for wireless power transfer.
FIG. 62 is a schematic diagram of another conductor arrangement of an exemplary system embodiment for wireless power transfer.
FIG. 63 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary system embodiment of a source comprising an array of equally sized resonators.
FIG. 64 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary system embodiment of a source comprising an array of multi-sized resonators.
FIGS. 65A-65C are schematic diagrams of an exemplary embodiment of an adjustable size source comprising planar resonator structures.
FIGS. 66A-66D are schematic diagrams showing wireless power transfer systems with an adjustable source size.
FIG. 67A and FIG. 67B are schematic diagrams showing resonators with different keep out zones.
FIG. 68 is a schematic diagram showing a resonator with a symmetric keep out zone.
FIG. 69 is a schematic diagram showing a resonator with an asymmetric keep out zone.
FIG. 70 is a schematic diagram showing an application of wireless power transfer.
FIG. 71A and FIG. 71B are schematic diagrams showing arrays of resonators used to reduce lateral and angular alignment dependence between the source and device in a wireless power transfer system.
FIG. 72 is a plot of resonator efficiency as a function of resonator displacement showing the effect of resonator orientation.
FIG. 73A and FIG. 73B are schematic diagrams showing lateral and angular misalignments between resonators.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION
As described above, this disclosure relates to coupled electromagnetic resonators with long-lived oscillatory resonant modes that may wirelessly transfer power from a power supply to a power drain. However, the technique is not restricted to electromagnetic resonators, but is general and may be applied to a wide variety of resonators and resonant objects. Therefore, we first describe the general technique, and then disclose electromagnetic examples for wireless energy transfer.
Resonators
A resonator may be defined as a system that can store energy in at least two different forms, and where the stored energy is oscillating between the two forms. The resonance has a specific oscillation mode with a resonant (modal) frequency, f, and a resonant (modal) field. The angular resonant frequency, ω, may be defined as ω=2πf, the resonant wavelength, λ, may be defined as λ=c/f, where c is the speed of light, and the resonant period, T, may be defined as T=1/f=2π/ω. In the absence of loss mechanisms, coupling mechanisms or external energy supplying or draining mechanisms, the total resonator stored energy, W, would stay fixed and the two forms of energy would oscillate, wherein one would be maximum when the other is minimum and vice versa.
In the absence of extraneous materials or objects, the energy in the resonator 102 shown in FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B may decay or be lost by intrinsic losses. The resonator fields then obey the following linear equation:




  
    
      
        da
        ⁡
        
          (
          t
          )
        
      
      dt
    
    =
    
      
        -
        
          i
          ⁡
          
            (
            
              ω
              -
              
                i
                ⁢
                
                  
                
                ⁢
                Γ
              
            
            )
          
        
      
      ⁢
      
        a
        ⁡
        
          (
          t
          )
        
      
    
  
  ,




where the variable a(t) is the resonant field amplitude, defined so that the energy contained within the resonator is given by |a(t)|2. Γ is the intrinsic energy decay or loss rate (e.g. due to absorption and radiation losses).

The Quality Factor, or Q-factor, or Q, of the resonator, which characterizes the energy decay, is inversely proportional to these energy losses. It may be defined as Q=ω*W/P, where P is the time-averaged power lost at steady state. That is, a resonator 102 with a high-Q has relatively low intrinsic losses and can store energy for a relatively long time. Since the resonator loses energy at its intrinsic decay rate, 2Γ, its Q, also referred to as its intrinsic Q, is given by Q=ω/2Γ. The quality factor also represents the number of oscillation periods, T, it takes for the energy in the resonator to decay by a factor of e.
As described above, we define the quality factor or Q of the resonator as that due only to intrinsic loss mechanisms. A subscript index such as Q1, indicates the resonator (resonator 1 in this case) to which the Q refers. FIG. 2 shows an electromagnetic resonator 102 labeled according to this convention. Note that in this figure, there are no extraneous objects or additional resonators in the vicinity of resonator 1.
Extraneous objects and/or additional resonators in the vicinity of a first resonator may perturb or load the first resonator, thereby perturbing or loading the Q of the first resonator, depending on a variety of factors such as the distance between the resonator and object or other resonator, the material composition of the object or other resonator, the structure of the first resonator, the power in the first resonator, and the like. Unintended external energy losses or coupling mechanisms to extraneous materials and objects in the vicinity of the resonators may be referred to as “perturbing” the Q of a resonator, and may be indicated by a subscript within rounded parentheses, ( ). Intended external energy losses, associated with energy transfer via coupling to other resonators and to generators and loads in the wireless energy transfer system may be referred to as “loading” the Q of the resonator, and may be indicated by a subscript within square brackets, [ ].
The Q of a resonator 102 connected or coupled to a power generator, g, or load 302, l, may be called the “loaded quality factor” or the “loaded Q” and may be denoted by Q[g] or Q[l], as illustrated in FIG. 3. In general, there may be more than one generator or load 302 connected to a resonator 102. However, we do not list those generators or loads separately but rather use “g” and “l” to refer to the equivalent circuit loading imposed by the combinations of generators and loads. In general descriptions, we may use the subscript “l” to refer to either generators or loads connected to the resonators.
In some of the discussion herein, we define the “loading quality factor” or the “loading Q” due to a power generator or load connected to the resonator, as δQ[l], where, 1/δQ[l]≡1/Q[l]−1/Q. Note that the larger the loading Q, δQ[l], of a generator or load, the less the loaded Q, Q[l], deviates from the unloaded Q of the resonator.
The Q of a resonator in the presence of an extraneous object 402,p, that is not intended to be part of the energy transfer system may be called the “perturbed quality factor” or the “perturbed Q” and may be denoted by Q(p), as illustrated in FIG. 4. In general, there may be many extraneous objects, denoted as p1, p2, etc., or a set of extraneous objects {p}, that perturb the Q of the resonator 102. In this case, the perturbed Q may be denoted Q(p1+p2+ . . . ) or Q({p}). For example, Q1(brick+wood) may denote the perturbed quality factor of a first resonator in a system for wireless power exchange in the presence of a brick and a piece of wood, and Q2({office}) may denote the perturbed quality factor of a second resonator in a system for wireless power exchange in an office environment.
In some of the discussion herein, we define the “perturbing quality factor” or the “perturbing Q” due to an extraneous object, p, as δQ(p), where 1/δQ(p)≡1/Q(p)−1/Q. As stated before, the perturbing quality factor may be due to multiple extraneous objects, p1, p2, etc. or a set of extraneous objects, {p}. The larger the perturbing Q, δQ(p), of an object, the less the perturbed Q, Q(p), deviates from the unperturbed Q of the resonator.
In some of the discussion herein, we also define Θ(p)≡Q(p)/Q and call it the “quality factor insensitivity” or the “Q-insensitivity” of the resonator in the presence of an extraneous object. A subscript index, such as Θ1(p), indicates the resonator to which the perturbed and unperturbed quality factors are referring, namely, Θ1(p)≡Q1(p)/Q1.
Note that the quality factor, Q, may also be characterized as “unperturbed”, when necessary to distinguish it from the perturbed quality factor, Q(p), and “unloaded”, when necessary to distinguish it from the loaded quality factor, Q[l]. Similarly, the perturbed quality factor, Q(p), may also be characterized as “unloaded”, when necessary to distinguish them from the loaded perturbed quality factor, Q(p)[l].
Coupled Resonators
Resonators having substantially the same resonant frequency, coupled through any portion of their near-fields may interact and exchange energy. There are a variety of physical pictures and models that may be employed to understand, design, optimize and characterize this energy exchange. One way to describe and model the energy exchange between two coupled resonators is using coupled mode theory (CMT).
In coupled mode theory, the resonator fields obey the following set of linear equations:




  
    
      
        da
        m
      
      ⁡
      
        (
        t
        )
      
    
    dt
  
  =
  
    
      
        -
        
          i
          ⁡
          
            (
            
              
                ω
                m
              
              -
              
                i
                ⁢
                
                  
                
                ⁢
                
                  Γ
                  m
                
              
            
            )
          
        
      
      ⁢
      
        
          a
          m
        
        ⁡
        
          (
          t
          )
        
      
    
    +
    
      i
      ⁢
      
        
          ∑
          
            n
            ≠
            m
          
        
        ⁢
        
          
            κ
            mn
          
          ⁢
          
            
              a
              n
            
            ⁡
            
              (
              t
              )
            
          
        
      
    
  




where the indices denote different resonators and κmn, are the coupling coefficients between the resonators. For a reciprocal system, the coupling coefficients may obey the relation κmn=κnm. Note that, for the purposes of the present specification, far-field radiation interference effects will be ignored and thus the coupling coefficients will be considered real. Furthermore, since in all subsequent calculations of system performance in this specification the coupling coefficients appear only with their square, κmn2, we use κmn to denote the absolute value of the real coupling coefficients.

Note that the coupling coefficient, κmn, from the CMT described above is related to the so-called coupling factor, kmn, between resonators m and n by kmn=2κmn/√{square root over (ωmωn)}. We define a “strong-coupling factor”, Umn, as the ratio of the coupling and loss rates between resonators m and n, by Umn=κmn/√{square root over (ΓmΓn)}=kmn√{square root over (QmQn)}.
The quality factor of a resonator m, in the presence of a similar frequency resonator n or additional resonators, may be loaded by that resonator n or additional resonators, in a fashion similar to the resonator being loaded by a connected power generating or consuming device. The fact that resonator m may be loaded by resonator n and vice versa is simply a different way to see that the resonators are coupled.
The loaded Q's of the resonators in these cases may be denoted as Qm[n] and Qn[m]. For multiple resonators or loading supplies or devices, the total loading of a resonator may be determined by modeling each load as a resistive loss, and adding the multiple loads in the appropriate parallel and/or series combination to determine the equivalent load of the ensemble.
In some of the discussion herein, we define the “loading quality factor” or the “loading Qm” of resonator m due to resonator n as δQm[n], where 1/δQm[n]≡1/Qm[n]−1/Qm. Note that resonator n is also loaded by resonator m and its “loading Qn” is given by 1/δQn[m]≡1/Qn[m]−1/Qn.
When one or more of the resonators are connected to power generators or loads, the set of linear equations is modified to:



  
    
      
        
          da
          m
        
        ⁡
        
          (
          t
          )
        
      
      dt
    
    =
    
      
        
          -
          
            i
            ⁡
            
              (
              
                
                  ω
                  m
                
                -
                
                  i
                  ⁢
                  
                    
                  
                  ⁢
                  
                    Γ
                    m
                  
                
              
              )
            
          
        
        ⁢
        
          
            a
            m
          
          ⁡
          
            (
            t
            )
          
        
      
      +
      
        i
        ⁢
        
          
            ∑
            
              n
              ≠
              m
            
          
          ⁢
          
            
              κ
              mn
            
            ⁢
            
              
                a
                n
              
              ⁡
              
                (
                t
                )
              
            
          
        
      
      -
      
        
          κ
          m
        
        ⁢
        
          
            a
            m
          
          ⁡
          
            (
            t
            )
          
        
      
      +
      
        
          
            2
            ⁢
            
              κ
              m
            
          
        
        ⁢
        
          
            s
            
              +
              m
            
          
          ⁡
          
            (
            t
            )
          
        
      
    
  




  
    
      
    
    ⁢
    
      
        
          
            s
            
              -
              m
            
          
          ⁡
          
            (
            t
            )
          
        
        =
        
          
            
              
                2
                ⁢
                
                  κ
                  m
                
              
            
            ⁢
            
              
                a
                m
              
              ⁡
              
                (
                t
                )
              
            
          
          -
          
            
              s
              
                +
                m
              
            
            ⁡
            
              (
              t
              )
            
          
        
      
      ,
    
  



where s+m(t) and s−m(t) are respectively the amplitudes of the fields coming from a generator into the resonator m and going out of the resonator m either back towards the generator or into a load, defined so that the power they carry is given by |s+m(t)|2 and |s−m(t)|2. The loading coefficients κm relate to the rate at which energy is exchanged between the resonator m and the generator or load connected to it.

Note that the loading coefficient, κm, from the CMT described above is related to the loading quality factor, δQm[l], defined earlier, by δQm[l]=ωm/2κm.
We define a “strong-loading factor”, Um[l], as the ratio of the loading and loss rates of resonator m, Um[l]=κm/Γm=Qm/δQm[l].
FIG. 1A shows an example of two coupled resonators 1000, a first resonator 102S, configured as a source resonator and a second resonator 102D, configured as a device resonator. Energy may be transferred over a distance D between the resonators. The source resonator 102S may be driven by a power supply or generator (not shown). Work may be extracted from the device resonator 102D by a power consuming drain or load (e.g. a load resistor, not shown). Let us use the subscripts “s” for the source, “d” for the device, “g” for the generator, and “1” for the load, and, since in this example there are only two resonators and κsd=kds, let us drop the indices on κsd, ksd, and Usd, and denote them as κ, k, and U, respectively.
The power generator may be constantly driving the source resonator at a constant driving frequency, f, corresponding to an angular driving frequency, ω, where ω=2πf.
In this case, the efficiency, η=|s−d|2/|s+s|2, of the power transmission from the generator to the load (via the source and device resonators) is maximized under the following conditions: The source resonant frequency, the device resonant frequency and the generator driving frequency have to be matched, namely

ωs=ωd=ω.

Furthermore, the loading Q of the source resonator due to the generator, δQs[g], has to be matched (equal) to the loaded Q of the source resonator due to the device resonator and the load, Qs[dl], and inversely the loading Q of the device resonator due to the load, δQd[l], has to be matched (equal) to the loaded Q of the device resonator due to the source resonator and the generator, Qd[sg], namely

δQs[g]=δQs[dl] and δQd[l]=δQd[sg].

These equations determine the optimal loading rates of the source resonator by the generator and of the device resonator by the load as





  
    U
    
      d
      ⁡
      
        [
        l
        ]
      
    
  
  =
  
    
      
        κ
        d
      
      ⁢
      
        /
      
      ⁢
      
        Γ
        d
      
    
    =
    
      
        
          Q
          d
        
        ⁢
        
          /
        
        ⁢
        δ
        ⁢
        
          
        
        ⁢
        
          Q
          
            d
            ⁡
            
              [
              l
              ]
            
          
        
      
      =
      
        
          
            1
            +
            
              U
              2
            
          
        
        =
        
          
            
              1
              +
              
                
                  (
                  
                    κ
                    ⁢
                    
                      /
                    
                    ⁢
                    
                      
                        
                          Γ
                          s
                        
                        ⁢
                        
                          Γ
                          d
                        
                      
                    
                  
                  )
                
                2
              
            
          
          =
          
            
              
                Q
                s
              
              ⁢
              
                /
              
              ⁢
              δ
              ⁢
              
                
              
              ⁢
              
                Q
                
                  s
                  ⁡
                  
                    [
                    g
                    ]
                  
                
              
            
            =
            
              
                
                  κ
                  s
                
                ⁢
                
                  /
                
                ⁢
                
                  Γ
                  s
                
              
              =
              
                
                  U
                  
                    s
                    ⁡
                    
                      [
                      g
                      ]
                    
                  
                
                .
              
            
          
        
      
    
  




Note that the above frequency matching and Q matching conditions are together known as “impedance matching” in electrical engineering.

Under the above conditions, the maximized efficiency is a monotonically increasing function of only the strong-coupling factor, U=κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}=k√{square root over (QsQd)}, between the source and device resonators and is given by, η=U2/(1+√{square root over (1+U2)})2, as shown in FIG. 5. Note that the coupling efficiency, η, is greater than 1% when U is greater than 0.2, is greater than 10% when U is greater than 0.7, is greater than 17% when U is greater than 1, is greater than 52% when U is greater than 3, is greater than 80% when U is greater than 9, is greater than 90% when U is greater than 19, and is greater than 95% when U is greater than 45. In some applications, the regime of operation where U>1 may be referred to as the “strong-coupling” regime.
Since a large U=κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}=(2κ/√{square root over (ωsωd)})√{square root over (QsQd)} is desired in certain circumstances, resonators may be used that are high-Q. The Q of each resonator may be high. The geometric mean of the resonator Q's, √{square root over (QsQd)} may also or instead be high.
The coupling factor, k, is a number between 0≦k≦1, and it may be independent (or nearly independent) of the resonant frequencies of the source and device resonators, rather it may be determined mostly by their relative geometry and the physical decay-law of the field mediating their coupling. In contrast, the coupling coefficient, κ=k√{square root over (ωsωd)}/2, may be a strong function of the resonant frequencies. The resonant frequencies of the resonators may be chosen preferably to achieve a high Q rather than to achieve a low Γ, as these two goals may be achievable at two separate resonant frequency regimes.
A high-Q resonator may be defined as one with Q>100. Two coupled resonators may be referred to as a system of high-Q resonators when each resonator has a Q greater than 100, Qs>100 and Qd>100. In other implementations, two coupled resonators may be referred to as a system of high-Q resonators when the geometric mean of the resonator Q's is greater than 100, √{square root over (QsQd)}>100.
The resonators may be named or numbered. They may be referred to as source resonators, device resonators, first resonators, second resonators, repeater resonators, and the like. It is to be understood that while two resonators are shown in FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B, and in many of the examples below, other implementations may include three (3) or more resonators. For example, a single source resonator 102S may transfer energy to multiple device resonators 102D or multiple devices. Energy may be transferred from a first device to a second, and then from the second device to the third, and so forth. Multiple sources may transfer energy to a single device or to multiple devices connected to a single device resonator or to multiple devices connected to multiple device resonators. Resonators 102 may serve alternately or simultaneously as sources, devices, or they may be used to relay power from a source in one location to a device in another location. Intermediate electromagnetic resonators 102 may be used to extend the distance range of wireless energy transfer systems. Multiple resonators 102 may be daisy chained together, exchanging energy over extended distances and with a wide range of sources and devices. High power levels may be split between multiple sources 102S, transferred to multiple devices and recombined at a distant location.
The analysis of a single source and a single device resonator may be extended to multiple source resonators and/or multiple device resonators and/or multiple intermediate resonators. In such an analysis, the conclusion may be that large strong-coupling factors, Umn, between at least some or all of the multiple resonators is preferred for a high system efficiency in the wireless energy transfer. Again, implementations may use source, device and intermediate resonators that have a high Q. The Q of each resonator may be high. The geometric mean √{square root over (QmQn)} of the Q's for pairs of resonators m and n, for which a large Umn is desired, may also or instead be high.
Note that since the strong-coupling factor of two resonators may be determined by the relative magnitudes of the loss mechanisms of each resonator and the coupling mechanism between the two resonators, the strength of any or all of these mechanisms may be perturbed in the presence of extraneous objects in the vicinity of the resonators as described above.
Continuing the conventions for labeling from the previous sections, we describe k as the coupling factor in the absence of extraneous objects or materials. We denote the coupling factor in the presence of an extraneous object, p, as k(p), and call it the “perturbed coupling factor” or the “perturbed k”. Note that the coupling factor, k, may also be characterized as “unperturbed”, when necessary to distinguish from the perturbed coupling factor k(p).
We define δk(p)≡k(p)−k and we call it the “perturbation on the coupling factor” or the “perturbation on k” due to an extraneous object, p.
We also define β(p)≡k(p)/k and we call it the “coupling factor insensitivity” or the “k−insensitivity”. Lower indices, such as β12(p), indicate the resonators to which the perturbed and unperturbed coupling factor is referred to, namely β12(p)≡k12(p)/k12.
Similarly, we describe U as the strong-coupling factor in the absence of extraneous objects. We denote the strong-coupling factor in the presence of an extraneous object, p, as U(p), U(p)=k(p)√{square root over (Q1(p)Q2(p))}, and call it the “perturbed strong-coupling factor” or the “perturbed U”. Note that the strong-coupling factor U may also be characterized as “unperturbed”, when necessary to distinguish from the perturbed strong-coupling factor U(p). Note that the strong-coupling factor U may also be characterized as “unperturbed”, when necessary to distinguish from the perturbed strong-coupling factor U(p).
We define δU(p)≡U(p)−U and call it the “perturbation on the strong-coupling factor” or the “perturbation on U” due to an extraneous object, p.
We also define Ξ(p)≡U(p)/U and call it the “strong-coupling factor insensitivity” or the “U-insensitivity”. Lower indices, such as Ξ12(p), indicate the resonators to which the perturbed and unperturbed coupling factor refers, namely Ξ12(p)≡U12(p)/U12.
The efficiency of the energy exchange in a perturbed system may be given by the same formula giving the efficiency of the unperturbed system, where all parameters such as strong-coupling factors, coupling factors, and quality factors are replaced by their perturbed equivalents. For example, in a system of wireless energy transfer including one source and one device resonator, the optimal efficiency may calculated as η(p)=[U(p)/(1+√{square root over (1+U(p)2)})]2. Therefore, in a system of wireless energy exchange which is perturbed by extraneous objects, large perturbed strong-coupling factors, Umn(p), between at least some or all of the multiple resonators may be desired for a high system efficiency in the wireless energy transfer. Source, device and/or intermediate resonators may have a high Q(p).
Some extraneous perturbations may sometimes be detrimental for the perturbed strong-coupling factors (via large perturbations on the coupling factors or the quality factors). Therefore, techniques may be used to reduce the effect of extraneous perturbations on the system and preserve large strong-coupling factor insensitivities.
Efficiency of Energy Exchange
The so-called “useful” energy in a useful energy exchange is the energy or power that must be delivered to a device (or devices) in order to power or charge the device. The transfer efficiency that corresponds to a useful energy exchange may be system or application dependent. For example, high power vehicle charging applications that transfer kilowatts of power may need to be at least 80% efficient in order to supply useful amounts of power resulting in a useful energy exchange sufficient to recharge a vehicle battery, without significantly heating up various components of the transfer system. In some consumer electronics applications, a useful energy exchange may include any energy transfer efficiencies greater than 10%, or any other amount acceptable to keep rechargeable batteries “topped off” and running for long periods of time. For some wireless sensor applications, transfer efficiencies that are much less than 1% may be adequate for powering multiple low power sensors from a single source located a significant distance from the sensors. For still other applications, where wired power transfer is either impossible or impractical, a wide range of transfer efficiencies may be acceptable for a useful energy exchange and may be said to supply useful power to devices in those applications. In general, an operating distance is any distance over which a useful energy exchange is or can be maintained according to the principles disclosed herein.
A useful energy exchange for a wireless energy transfer in a powering or recharging application may be efficient, highly efficient, or efficient enough, as long as the wasted energy levels, heat dissipation, and associated field strengths are within tolerable limits. The tolerable limits may depend on the application, the environment and the system location. Wireless energy transfer for powering or recharging applications may be efficient, highly efficient, or efficient enough, as long as the desired system performance may be attained for the reasonable cost restrictions, weight restrictions, size restrictions, and the like. Efficient energy transfer may be determined relative to that which could be achieved using traditional inductive techniques that are not high-Q systems. Then, the energy transfer may be defined as being efficient, highly efficient, or efficient enough, if more energy is delivered than could be delivered by similarly sized coil structures in traditional inductive schemes over similar distances or alignment offsets.
Note that, even though certain frequency and Q matching conditions may optimize the system efficiency of energy transfer, these conditions may not need to be exactly met in order to have efficient enough energy transfer for a useful energy exchange. Efficient energy exchange may be realized so long as the relative offset of the resonant frequencies (|ωm−ωn|/√{square root over (ωmωn)}) is less than approximately the maximum among 1/Qm(p), 1/Qn(p) and kmn(p). The Q matching condition may be less critical than the frequency matching condition for efficient energy exchange. The degree by which the strong-loading factors, Um[l], of the resonators due to generators and/or loads may be away from their optimal values and still have efficient enough energy exchange depends on the particular system, whether all or some of the generators and/or loads are Q-mismatched and so on.
Therefore, the resonant frequencies of the resonators may not be exactly matched, but may be matched within the above tolerances. The strong-loading factors of at least some of the resonators due to generators and/or loads may not be exactly matched to their optimal value. The voltage levels, current levels, impedance values, material parameters, and the like may not be at the exact values described in the disclosure but will be within some acceptable tolerance of those values. The system optimization may include cost, size, weight, complexity, and the like, considerations, in addition to efficiency, Q, frequency, strong coupling factor, and the like, considerations. Some system performance parameters, specifications, and designs may be far from optimal in order to optimize other system performance parameters, specifications and designs.
In some applications, at least some of the system parameters may be varying in time, for example because components, such as sources or devices, may be mobile or aging or because the loads may be variable or because the perturbations or the environmental conditions are changing etc. In these cases, in order to achieve acceptable matching conditions, at least some of the system parameters may need to be dynamically adjustable or tunable. All the system parameters may be dynamically adjustable or tunable to achieve approximately the optimal operating conditions. However, based on the discussion above, efficient enough energy exchange may be realized even if some system parameters are not variable. In some examples, at least some of the devices may not be dynamically adjusted. In some examples, at least some of the sources may not be dynamically adjusted. In some examples, at least some of the intermediate resonators may not be dynamically adjusted. In some examples, none of the system parameters may be dynamically adjusted.
Electromagnetic Resonators
The resonators used to exchange energy may be electromagnetic resonators. In such resonators, the intrinsic energy decay rates, Γm, are given by the absorption (or resistive) losses and the radiation losses of the resonator.
The resonator may be constructed such that the energy stored by the electric field is primarily confined within the structure and that the energy stored by the magnetic field is primarily in the region surrounding the resonator. Then, the energy exchange is mediated primarily by the resonant magnetic near-field. These types of resonators may be referred to as magnetic resonators.
The resonator may be constructed such that the energy stored by the magnetic field is primarily confined within the structure and that the energy stored by the electric field is primarily in the region surrounding the resonator. Then, the energy exchange is mediated primarily by the resonant electric near-field. These types of resonators may be referred to as electric resonators.
Note that the total electric and magnetic energies stored by the resonator have to be equal, but their localizations may be quite different. In some cases, the ratio of the average electric field energy to the average magnetic field energy specified at a distance from a resonator may be used to characterize or describe the resonator.
Electromagnetic resonators may include an inductive element, a distributed inductance, or a combination of inductances with inductance, L, and a capacitive element, a distributed capacitance, or a combination of capacitances, with capacitance, C. A minimal circuit model of an electromagnetic resonator 102 is shown in FIG. 6A. The resonator may include an inductive element 108 and a capacitive element 104. Provided with initial energy, such as electric field energy stored in the capacitor 104, the system will oscillate as the capacitor discharges transferring energy into magnetic field energy stored in the inductor 108 which in turn transfers energy back into electric field energy stored in the capacitor 104.
The resonators 102 shown in FIG. 6B, FIG. 6C and FIG. 6D may be referred to as magnetic resonators. Magnetic resonators may be preferred for wireless energy transfer applications in populated environments because most everyday materials including animals, plants, and humans are non-magnetic (i.e., μr≈1), so their interaction with magnetic fields is minimal and due primarily to eddy currents induced by the time-variation of the magnetic fields, which is a second-order effect. This characteristic is important both for safety reasons and because it reduces the potential for interactions with extraneous environmental objects and materials that could alter system performance.
FIG. 6D shows a simplified drawing of some of the electric and magnetic field lines associated with an exemplary magnetic resonator 102B. The magnetic resonator 102B may include a loop of conductor acting as an inductive element 108 and a capacitive element 104 at the ends of the conductor loop. Note that this drawing depicts most of the energy in the region surrounding the resonator being stored in the magnetic field, and most of the energy in the resonator (between the capacitor plates) stored in the electric field. Some electric field, owing to fringing fields, free charges, and the time varying magnetic field, may be stored in the region around the resonator, but the magnetic resonator may be designed to confine the electric fields to be close to or within the resonator itself, as much as possible.
The inductor 108 and capacitor 104 of an electromagnetic resonator 102 may be bulk circuit elements, or the inductance and capacitance may be distributed and may result from the way the conductors are formed, shaped, or positioned, in the structure. For example, the inductor 108 may be realized by shaping a conductor to enclose a surface area, as shown in FIG. 6B, FIG. 6C, and FIG. 6D. This type of resonator 102 may be referred to as a capacitively-loaded loop inductor. Note that we may use the terms “loop” or “coil” to indicate generally a conducting structure (wire, tube, strip, etc.), enclosing a surface of any shape and dimension, with any number of turns. In FIG. 6B, the enclosed surface area is circular, but the surface may be any of a wide variety of other shapes and sizes and may be designed to achieve certain system performance specifications. As an example to indicate how inductance scales with physical dimensions, the inductance for a length of circular conductor arranged to form a circular single-turn loop is approximately,




  
    L
    =
    
      
        μ
        0
      
      ⁢
      
        x
        ⁡
        
          (
          
            
              ln
              ⁢
              
                
                  8
                  ⁢
                  x
                
                a
              
            
            -
            2
          
          )
        
      
    
  
  ,




where μ0 is the magnetic permeability of free space, x, is the radius of the enclosed circular surface area and, a, is the radius of the conductor used to form the inductor loop. A more precise value of the inductance of the loop may be calculated analytically or numerically.

The inductance for other cross-section conductors, arranged to form other enclosed surface shapes, areas, sizes, and the like, and of any number of wire turns, may be calculated analytically, numerically or it may be determined by measurement. The inductance may be realized using inductor elements, distributed inductance, networks, arrays, series and parallel combinations of inductors and inductances, and the like. The inductance may be fixed or variable and may be used to vary impedance matching as well as resonant frequency operating conditions.
There are a variety of ways to realize the capacitance required to achieve the desired resonant frequency for a resonator structure. Capacitor plates 110 may be formed and utilized as shown in FIG. 6B, or the capacitance may be distributed and be realized between adjacent windings of a multi-loop conductor 114, as shown in FIG. 6C. The capacitance may be realized using capacitor elements, distributed capacitance, networks, arrays, series and parallel combinations of capacitances, and the like. The capacitance may be fixed or variable and may be used to vary impedance matching as well as resonant frequency operating conditions.
It is to be understood that the inductance and capacitance in an electromagnetic resonator 102 may be lumped, distributed, or a combination of lumped and distributed inductance and capacitance and that electromagnetic resonators may be realized by combinations of the various elements, techniques and effects described herein.
Electromagnetic resonators 102 may be include inductors, inductances, capacitors, capacitances, as well as additional circuit elements such as resistors, diodes, switches, amplifiers, diodes, transistors, transformers, conductors, connectors and the like.
Resonant Frequency of an Electromagnetic Resonator
An electromagnetic resonator 102 may have a characteristic, natural, or resonant frequency determined by its physical properties. This resonant frequency is the frequency at which the energy stored by the resonator oscillates between that stored by the electric field, WE, (WE=q2/2C, where q is the charge on the capacitor, C) and that stored by the magnetic field, WB, (WB=Li2/2, where i is the current through the inductor, L) of the resonator. In the absence of any losses in the system, energy would continually be exchanged between the electric field in the capacitor 104 and the magnetic field in the inductor 108. The frequency at which this energy is exchanged may be called the characteristic frequency, the natural frequency, or the resonant frequency of the resonator, and is given by ω,




  ω
  =
  
    
      2
      ⁢
      π
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      f
    
    =
    
      
        
          1
          LC
        
      
      .
    
  




The resonant frequency of the resonator may be changed by tuning the inductance, L, and/or the capacitance, C, of the resonator. The resonator frequency may be design to operate at the so-called ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) frequencies as specified by the FCC. The resonator frequency may be chosen to meet certain field limit specifications, specific absorption rate (SAR) limit specifications, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) specifications, electromagnetic interference (EMI) specifications, component size, cost or performance specifications, and the like.
Quality Factor of an Electromagnetic Resonator
The energy in the resonators 102 shown in FIG. 6A—FIG. 6E may decay or be lost by intrinsic losses including absorptive losses (also called ohmic or resistive losses) and/or radiative losses. The Quality Factor, or Q, of the resonator, which characterizes the energy decay, is inversely proportional to these losses. Absorptive losses may be caused by the finite conductivity of the conductor used to form the inductor as well as by losses in other elements, components, connectors, and the like, in the resonator. An inductor formed from low loss materials may be referred to as a “high-Q inductive element” and elements, components, connectors and the like with low losses may be referred to as having “high resistive Q's”. In general, the total absorptive loss for a resonator may be calculated as the appropriate series and/or parallel combination of resistive losses for the various elements and components that make up the resonator. That is, in the absence of any significant radiative or component/connection losses, the Q of the resonator may be given by, Qabs,




  
    
      Q
      abs
    
    =
    
      
        ω
        ⁢
        
          
        
        ⁢
        L
      
      
        R
        abs
      
    
  
  ,




where ω, is the resonant frequency, L, is the total inductance of the resonator and the resistance for the conductor used to form the inductor, for example, may be given by Rabs=lρ/A, (l is the length of the wire, ρ is the resistivity of the conductor material, and A is the cross-sectional area over which current flows in the wire). For alternating currents, the cross-sectional area over which current flows may be less than the physical cross-sectional area of the conductor owing to the skin effect. Therefore, high-Q magnetic resonators may be composed of conductors with high conductivity, relatively large surface areas and/or with specially designed profiles (e.g. Litz wire) to minimize proximity effects and reduce the AC resistance.

The magnetic resonator structures may include high-Q inductive elements composed of high conductivity wire, coated wire, Litz wire, ribbon, strapping or plates, tubing, paint, gels, traces, and the like. The magnetic resonators may be self-resonant, or they may include external coupled elements such as capacitors, inductors, switches, diodes, transistors, transformers, and the like. The magnetic resonators may include distributed and lumped capacitance and inductance. In general, the Q of the resonators will be determined by the Q's of all the individual components of the resonator.
Because Q is proportional to inductance, L, resonators may be designed to increase L, within certain other constraints. One way to increase L, for example, is to use more than one turn of the conductor to form the inductor in the resonator. Design techniques and trade-offs may depend on the application, and a wide variety of structures, conductors, components, and resonant frequencies may be chosen in the design of high-Q magnetic resonators.
In the absence of significant absorption losses, the Q of the resonator may be determined primarily by the radiation losses, and given by, Qrad=ωL/Rrad, where Rrad is the radiative loss of the resonator and may depend on the size of the resonator relative to the frequency, ω, or wavelength, λ, of operation. For the magnetic resonators discussed above, radiative losses may scale as Rrad ̃(x/λ)4 (characteristic of magnetic dipole radiation), where x is a characteristic dimension of the resonator, such as the radius of the inductive element shown in FIG. 6B, and where λ=c/f, where c is the speed of light and f is as defined above. The size of the magnetic resonator may be much less than the wavelength of operation so radiation losses may be very small. Such structures may be referred to as sub-wavelength resonators. Radiation may be a loss mechanism for non-radiative wireless energy transfer systems and designs may be chosen to reduce or minimize Rrad. Note that a high-Qrad may be desirable for non-radiative wireless energy transfer schemes.
Note too that the design of resonators for non-radiative wireless energy transfer differs from antennas designed for communication or far-field energy transmission purposes. Specifically, capacitively-loaded conductive loops may be used as resonant antennas (for example in cell phones), but those operate in the far-field regime where the radiation Q's are intentionally designed to be small to make the antenna efficient at radiating energy. Such designs are not appropriate for the efficient near-field wireless energy transfer technique disclosed in this application.
The quality factor of a resonator including both radiative and absorption losses is Q=ωL/(Rabs+Rrad) Note that there may be a maximum Q value for a particular resonator and that resonators may be designed with special consideration given to the size of the resonator, the materials and elements used to construct the resonator, the operating frequency, the connection mechanisms, and the like, in order to achieve a high-Q resonator. FIG. 7 shows a plot of Q of an exemplary magnetic resonator (in this case a coil with a diameter of 60 cm made of copper pipe with an outside diameter (OD) of 4 cm) that may be used for wireless power transmission at MHz frequencies. The absorptive Q (dashed line) 702 increases with frequency, while the radiative Q (dotted line) 704 decreases with frequency, thus leading the overall Q to peak 708 at a particular frequency. Note that the Q of this exemplary resonator is greater than 100 over a wide frequency range. Magnetic resonators may be designed to have high-Q over a range of frequencies and system operating frequency may set to any frequency in that range.
When the resonator is being described in terms of loss rates, the Q may be defined using the intrinsic decay rate, 2Γ, as described previously. The intrinsic decay rate is the rate at which an uncoupled and undriven resonator loses energy. For the magnetic resonators described above, the intrinsic loss rate may be given by Γ=(Rabs+Rrad)/2L, and the quality factor, Q, of the resonator is given by Q=ω/2Γ.
Note that a quality factor related only to a specific loss mechanism may be denoted as Qmechanism, if the resonator is not specified, or as Q1,mechanism, if the resonator is specified (e.g. resonator 1). For example, Q1,rad is the quality factor for resonator 1 related to its radiation losses.
Electromagnetic Resonator Near-Fields
The high-Q electromagnetic resonators used in the near-field wireless energy transfer system disclosed here may be sub-wavelength objects. That is, the physical dimensions of the resonator may be much smaller than the wavelength corresponding to the resonant frequency. Sub-wavelength magnetic resonators may have most of the energy in the region surrounding the resonator stored in their magnetic near-fields, and these fields may also be described as stationary or non-propagating because they do not radiate away from the resonator. The extent of the near-field in the area surrounding the resonator is typically set by the wavelength, so it may extend well beyond the resonator itself for a sub-wavelength resonator. The limiting surface, where the field behavior changes from near-field behavior to far-field behavior may be called the “radiation caustic”.
The strength of the near-field is reduced the farther one gets away from the resonator. While the field strength of the resonator near-fields decays away from the resonator, the fields may still interact with objects brought into the general vicinity of the resonator. The degree to which the fields interact depends on a variety of factors, some of which may be controlled and designed, and some of which may not. The wireless energy transfer schemes described herein may be realized when the distance between coupled resonators is such that one resonator lies within the radiation caustic of the other.
The near-field profiles of the electromagnetic resonators may be similar to those commonly associated with dipole resonators or oscillators. Such field profiles may be described as omni-directional, meaning the magnitudes of the fields are non-zero in all directions away from the object.
Characteristic Size of an Electromagnetic Resonator
Spatially separated and/or offset magnetic resonators of sufficient Q may achieve efficient wireless energy transfer over distances that are much larger than have been seen in the prior art, even if the sizes and shapes of the resonator structures are different. Such resonators may also be operated to achieve more efficient energy transfer than was achievable with previous techniques over shorter range distances. We describe such resonators as being capable of mid-range energy transfer.
Mid-range distances may be defined as distances that are larger than the characteristic dimension of the smallest of the resonators involved in the transfer, where the distance is measured from the center of one resonator structure to the center of a spatially separated second resonator structure. In this definition, two-dimensional resonators are spatially separated when the areas circumscribed by their inductive elements do not intersect and three-dimensional resonators are spatially separated when their volumes do not intersect. A two-dimensional resonator is spatially separated from a three-dimensional resonator when the area circumscribed by the former is outside the volume of the latter.
FIG. 8 shows some example resonators with their characteristic dimensions labeled. It is to be understood that the characteristic sizes 802 of resonators 102 may be defined in terms of the size of the conductor and the area circumscribed or enclosed by the inductive element in a magnetic resonator and the length of the conductor forming the capacitive element of an electric resonator. Then, the characteristic size 802 of a resonator 102, xchar, may be equal to the radius of the smallest sphere that can fit around the inductive or capacitive element of the magnetic or electric resonator respectively, and the center of the resonator structure is the center of the sphere. The characteristic thickness 804, tchar, of a resonator 102 may be the smallest possible height of the highest point of the inductive or capacitive element in the magnetic or capacitive resonator respectively, measured from a flat surface on which it is placed. The characteristic width 808 of a resonator 102, wchar, may be the radius of the smallest possible circle through which the inductive or capacitive element of the magnetic or electric resonator respectively, may pass while traveling in a straight line. For example, the characteristic width 808 of a cylindrical resonator may be the radius of the cylinder.
In this inventive wireless energy transfer technique, energy may be exchanged efficiently over a wide range of distances, but the technique is distinguished by the ability to exchange useful energy for powering or recharging devices over mid-range distances and between resonators with different physical dimensions, components and orientations. Note that while k may be small in these circumstances, strong coupling and efficient energy transfer may be realized by using high-Q resonators to achieve a high U, U=k√{square root over (QsQd)}. That is, increases in Q may be used to at least partially overcome decreases in k, to maintain useful energy transfer efficiencies.
Note too that while the near-field of a single resonator may be described as omni-directional, the efficiency of the energy exchange between two resonators may depend on the relative position and orientation of the resonators. That is, the efficiency of the energy exchange may be maximized for particular relative orientations of the resonators. The sensitivity of the transfer efficiency to the relative position and orientation of two uncompensated resonators may be captured in the calculation of either k or κ. While coupling may be achieved between resonators that are offset and/or rotated relative to each other, the efficiency of the exchange may depend on the details of the positioning and on any feedback, tuning, and compensation techniques implemented during operation.
High-Q Magnetic Resonators
In the near-field regime of a sub-wavelength capacitively-loaded loop magnetic resonator (x<<λ), the resistances associated with a circular conducting loop inductor composed of N turns of wire whose radius is larger than the skin depth, are approximately Rabs=√{square root over (μoρω/2)}·Nx/a and Rrad=π/6·ηoN2 (ωx/c)4, where ρ is the resistivity of the conductor material and ηo≈120πΩ is the impedance of free space. The inductance, L, for such a N-turn loop is approximately N2 times the inductance of a single-turn loop given previously. The quality factor of such a resonator, Q=ωL/(Rabs+Rrad), is highest for a particular frequency determined by the system parameters (FIG. 4). As described previously, at lower frequencies the Q is determined primarily by absorption losses and at higher frequencies the Q is determined primarily by radiation losses.
Note that the formulas given above are approximate and intended to illustrate the functional dependence of Rabs, Rrad and L on the physical parameters of the structure. More accurate numerical calculations of these parameters that take into account deviations from the strict quasi-static limit, for example a non-uniform current/charge distribution along the conductor, may be useful for the precise design of a resonator structure.
Note that the absorptive losses may be minimized by using low loss conductors to form the inductive elements. The loss of the conductors may be minimized by using large surface area conductors such as conductive tubing, strapping, strips, machined objects, plates, and the like, by using specially designed conductors such as Litz wire, braided wires, wires of any cross-section, and other conductors with low proximity losses, in which case the frequency scaled behavior described above may be different, and by using low resistivity materials such as high-purity copper and silver, for example. One advantage of using conductive tubing as the conductor at higher operating frequencies is that it may be cheaper and lighter than a similar diameter solid conductor, and may have similar resistance because most of the current is traveling along the outer surface of the conductor owing to the skin effect.
To get a rough estimate of achievable resonator designs made from copper wire or copper tubing and appropriate for operation in the microwave regime, one may calculate the optimum Q and resonant frequency for a resonator composed of one circular inductive element (N=1) of copper wire (ρ=1.69·10−8 Ωm) with various cross sections. Then for an inductive element with characteristic size x=1 cm and conductor diameter a=1 mm, appropriate for a cell phone for example, the quality factor peaks at Q=1225 when f=380 MHz. For x=30 cm and a=2 mm, an inductive element size that might be appropriate for a laptop or a household robot, Q=1103 at f=17 MHz. For a larger source inductive element that might be located in the ceiling for example, x=1 m and a=4 mm, Q may be as high as Q=1315 at f=5 MHz. Note that a number of practical examples yield expected quality factors of Q≈1000-1500 at λ/x≈50-80. Measurements of a wider variety of coil shapes, sizes, materials and operating frequencies than described above show that Q's>100 may be realized for a variety of magnetic resonator structures using commonly available materials.
As described above, the rate for energy transfer between two resonators of characteristic size x1 and x2, and separated by a distance D between their centers, may be given by κ. To give an example of how the defined parameters scale, consider the cell phone, laptop, and ceiling resonator examples from above, at three (3) distances; D/x=10, 8, 6. In the examples considered here, the source and device resonators are the same size, x1=x2, and shape, and are oriented as shown in FIG. 1B. In the cell phone example, ω/2κ=3033, 1553, 655 respectively. In the laptop example, ω/2κ=7131, 3651, 1540 respectively and for the ceiling resonator example, ω/2κ=6481, 3318, 1400. The corresponding coupling-to-loss ratios peak at the frequency where the inductive element Q peaks and are κ/Γ=0.4, 0.79, 1.97 and 0.15, 0.3, 0.72 and 0.2, 0.4, 0.94 for the three inductive element sizes and distances described above. An example using different sized inductive elements is that of an x1=1 m inductor (e.g. source in the ceiling) and an x2=30 cm inductor (e.g. household robot on the floor) at a distance D=3 m apart (e.g. room height). In this example, the strong-coupling figure of merit, U=κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)}=0.88, for an efficiency of approximately 14%, at the optimal operating frequency of f=6.4 MHz. Here, the optimal system operating frequency lies between the peaks of the individual resonator Q's.
Inductive elements may be formed for use in high-Q magnetic resonators. We have demonstrated a variety of high-Q magnetic resonators based on copper conductors that are formed into inductive elements that enclose a surface. Inductive elements may be formed using a variety of conductors arranged in a variety of shapes, enclosing any size or shaped area, and they may be single turn or multiple turn elements. Drawings of exemplary inductive elements 900A-B are shown in FIG. 9A-FIG. 9B. The inductive elements may be formed to enclose a circle, a rectangle, a square, a triangle, a shape with rounded corners, a shape that follows the contour of a particular structure or device, a shape that follows, fills, or utilizes, a dedicated space within a structure or device, and the like. The designs may be optimized for size, cost, weight, appearance, performance, and the like.
These conductors may be bent or formed into the desired size, shape, and number of turns. However, it may be difficult to accurately reproduce conductor shapes and sizes using manual techniques. In addition, it may be difficult to maintain uniform or desired center-to-center spacings between the conductor segments in adjacent turns of the inductive elements. Accurate or uniform spacing may be important in determining the self capacitance of the structure as well as any proximity effect induced increases in AC resistance, for example.
Molds may be used to replicate inductor elements for high-Q resonator designs. In addition, molds may be used to accurately shape conductors into any kind of shape without creating kinks, buckles or other potentially deleterious effects in the conductor. Molds may be used to form the inductor elements and then the inductor elements may be removed from the forms. Once removed, these inductive elements may be built into enclosures or devices that may house the high-Q magnetic resonator. The formed elements may also or instead remain in the mold used to form them.
The molds may be formed using standard CNC (computer numerical control) routing or milling tools or any other known techniques for cutting or forming grooves in blocks. The molds may also or instead be formed using machining techniques, injection molding techniques, casting techniques, pouring techniques, vacuum techniques, thermoforming techniques, cut-in-place techniques, compression forming techniques and the like.
The formed element may be removed from the mold or it may remain in the mold. The mold may be altered with the inductive element inside. The mold may be covered, machined, attached, painted and the like. The mold and conductor combination may be integrated into another housing, structure or device. The grooves cut into the molds may be any dimension and may be designed to form conducting tubing, wire, strapping, strips, blocks, and the like into the desired inductor shapes and sizes.
The inductive elements used in magnetic resonators may contain more than one loop and may spiral inward or outward or up or down or in some combination of directions. In general, the magnetic resonators may have a variety of shapes, sizes and number of turns and they may be composed of a variety of conducing materials.
The magnetic resonators may be free standing or they may be enclosed in an enclosure, container, sleeve or housing. The magnetic resonators may include the form used to make the inductive element. These various forms and enclosures may be composed of almost any kind of material. Low loss materials such as Teflon, REXOLITE, styrene, and the like may be preferable for some applications. These enclosures may contain fixtures that hold the inductive elements.
Magnetic resonators may be composed of self-resonant coils of copper wire or copper tubing. Magnetic resonators composed of self resonant conductive wire coils may include a wire of length l, and cross section radius a, wound into a helical coil of radius x, height h, and number of turns N, which may for example be characterized as N=√{square root over (l2−h2)}/2πx.
A magnetic resonator structure may be configured so that x is about 30 cm, h is about 20 cm, a is about 3 mm and N is about 5.25, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the magnetic resonator may drive the resonator at a resonant frequency, f, where f is about 10.6 MHz. Where x is about 30 cm, h is about 20 cm, a is about 1 cm and N is about 4, the resonator may be driven at a frequency, f, where f is about 13.4 MHz. Where x is about 10 cm, h is about 3 cm, a is about 2 mm and N is about 6, the resonator may be driven at a frequency, f, where f is about 21.4 MHz.
High-Q inductive elements may be designed using printed circuit board traces. Printed circuit board traces may have a variety of advantages compared to mechanically formed inductive elements including that they may be accurately reproduced and easily integrated using established printed circuit board fabrication techniques, that their AC resistance may be lowered using custom designed conductor traces, and that the cost of mass-producing them may be significantly reduced.
High-Q inductive elements may be fabricated using standard PCB techniques on any PCB material such as FR-4 (epoxy E-glass), multi-functional epoxy, high performance epoxy, bismalaimide triazine/epoxy, polyimide, Cyanate Ester, polytetraflouroethylene (Teflon), FR-2, FR-3, CEM-1, CEM-2, Rogers, Resolute, and the like. The conductor traces may be formed on printed circuit board materials with lower loss tangents.
The conducting traces may be composed of copper, silver, gold, aluminum, nickel and the like, and they may be composed of paints, inks, or other cured materials. The circuit board may be flexible and it may be a flex-circuit. The conducting traces may be formed by chemical deposition, etching, lithography, spray deposition, cutting, and the like. The conducting traces may be applied to form the desired patterns and they may be formed using crystal and structure growth techniques.
The dimensions of the conducting traces, as well as the number of layers containing conducting traces, the position, size and shape of those traces and the architecture for interconnecting them may be designed to achieve or optimize certain system specifications such as resonator Q, Q(p), resonator size, resonator material and fabrication costs, U, U(p), and the like.
As an example, a three-turn high-Q inductive element 1001A was fabricated on a four-layer printed circuit board using the rectangular copper trace pattern as shown in FIG. 10A. The copper trace is shown in black and the PCB in white. The width and thickness of the copper traces in this example was approximately 1 cm (400 mils) and 43 μm (1.7 mils) respectively. The edge-to-edge spacing between turns of the conducting trace on a single layer was approximately 0.75 cm (300 mils) and each board layer thickness was approximately 100 μm (4 mils). The pattern shown in FIG. 10A was repeated on each layer of the board and the conductors were connected in parallel. The outer dimensions of the 3-loop structure were approximately 30 cm by 20 cm. The measured inductance of this PCB loop was 5.3 μH. A magnetic resonator using this inductor element and tunable capacitors had a quality factor, Q, of 550 at its designed resonance frequency of 6.78 MHz. The resonant frequency could be tuned by changing the inductance and capacitance values in the magnetic resonator.
As another example, a two-turn inductor 1001B was fabricated on a four-layer printed circuit board using the rectangular copper trace pattern shown in FIG. 10B. The copper trace is shown in black and the PCB in white. The width and height of the copper traces in this example were approximately 0.75 cm (300 mils) and 43 μm (1.7 mils) respectively. The edge-to-edge spacing between turns of the conducting trace on a single layer was approximately 0.635 cm (250 mils) and each board layer thickness was approximately 100 μm (4 mils). The pattern shown in FIG. 10B was repeated on each layer of the board and the conductors were connected in parallel. The outer dimensions of the two-loop structure were approximately 7.62 cm by 26.7 cm. The measured inductance of this PCB loop was 1.3 μH. Stacking two boards together with a vertical separation of approximately 0.635 cm (250 mils) and connecting the two boards in series produced a PCB inductor with an inductance of approximately 3.4 μH. A magnetic resonator using this stacked inductor loop and tunable capacitors had a quality factor, Q, of 390 at its designed resonance frequency of 6.78 MHz. The resonant frequency could be tuned by changing the inductance and capacitance values in the magnetic resonator.
The inductive elements may be formed using magnetic materials of any size, shape thickness, and the like, and of materials with a wide range of permeability and loss values. These magnetic materials may be solid blocks, they may enclose hollow volumes, they may be formed from many smaller pieces of magnetic material tiled and or stacked together, and they may be integrated with conducting sheets or enclosures made from highly conducting materials. Wires may be wrapped around the magnetic materials to generate the magnetic near-field. These wires may be wrapped around one or more than one axis of the structure. Multiple wires may be wrapped around the magnetic materials and combined in parallel, or in series, or via a switch to form customized near-field patterns.
The magnetic resonator may include 15 turns of Litz wire wound around a 19.2 cm×10 cm×5 mm tiled block of 3F3 ferrite material. The Litz wire may be wound around the ferrite material in any direction or combination of directions to achieve the desire resonator performance. The number of turns of wire, the spacing between the turns, the type of wire, the size and shape of the magnetic materials and the type of magnetic material are all design parameters that may be varied or optimized for different application scenarios.
High-Q Magnetic Resonators Using Magnetic Material Structures
It may be possible to use magnetic materials assembled to form an open magnetic circuit, albeit one with an air gap on the order of the size of the whole structure, to realize a magnetic resonator structure. In these structures, high conductivity materials are wound around a structure made from magnetic material to form the inductive element of the magnetic resonator. Capacitive elements may be connected to the high conductivity materials, with the resonant frequency then determined as described above. These magnetic resonators have their dipole moment in the plane of the two dimensional resonator structures, rather than perpendicular to it, as is the case for the capacitively-loaded inductor loop resonators.
A diagram of a single planar resonator structure is shown in FIG. 11A. The planar resonator structure is constructed of a core of magnetic material 1121, such as ferrite with a loop or loops of conducting material 1122 wrapped around the core 1121. The structure may be used as the source resonator that transfers power and the device resonator that captures energy. When used as a source, the ends of the conductor may be coupled to a power source. Alternating electrical current flowing through the conductor loops excites alternating magnetic fields. When the structure is being used to receive power, the ends of the conductor may be coupled to a power drain or load. Changing magnetic fields induce an electromotive force in the loop or loops of the conductor wound around the core magnetic material. The dipole moment of these types of structures is in the plane of the structures and is, for example, directed along the Y axis for the structure in FIG. 11A. Two such structures have strong coupling when placed substantially in the same plane (i.e. the X,Y plane of FIG. 11A). The structures of FIG. 11A have the most favorable orientation when the resonators are aligned in the same plane along their Y axis.
The geometry and the coupling orientations of the described planar resonators may be preferable for some applications. The planar or flat resonator shape may be easier to integrate into many electronic devices that are relatively flat and planar. The planar resonators may be integrated into the whole back or side of a device without requiring a change in geometry of the device. Due to the flat shape of many devices, the natural position of the devices when placed on a surface is to lay with their largest dimension being parallel to the surface they are placed on. A planar resonator integrated into a flat device is naturally parallel to the plane of the surface and is in a favorable coupling orientation relative to the resonators of other devices or planar resonator sources placed on a flat surface.
As mentioned, the geometry of the planar resonators may allow easier integration into devices. Their low profile may allow a resonator to be integrated into or as part of a complete side of a device. When a whole side of a device is covered by the resonator, magnetic flux can flow through the resonator core without being obstructed by lossy material that may be part of the device or device circuitry.
The core of the planar resonator structure may be of a variety of shapes and thicknesses and may be flat or planar such that the minimum dimension does not exceed 30% of the largest dimension of the structure. The core may have complex geometries and may have indentations, notches, ridges, and the like. Geometric enhancements may be used to reduce the coupling dependence on orientation and they may be used to facilitate integration into devices, packaging, packages, enclosures, covers, skins, and the like. Two exemplary variations of core geometries are shown in FIG. 11B. For example, the planar core 1131 may be shaped such that the ends are substantially wider than the middle of the structure to create an indentation for the conductor winding. The core material may be of varying thickness with ends that are thicker and wider than the middle. The core material 1132 may have any number of notches or cutouts 1133 of various depths, width, and shapes to accommodate conductor loops, housing, packaging, and the like.
The shape and dimensions of the core may be further dictated by the dimensions and characteristics of the device that they are integrated into. The core material may curve to follow the contours of the device, or may require non-symmetric notches or cutouts to allow clearance for parts of the device. The core structure may be a single monolithic piece of magnetic material or may be composed of a plurality of tiles, blocks, or pieces that are arranged together to form the larger structure. The different layers, tiles, blocks, or pieces of the structure may be of similar or may be of different materials. It may be desirable to use materials with different magnetic permeability in different locations of the structure. Core structures with different magnetic permeability may be useful for guiding the magnetic flux, improving coupling, and affecting the shape or extent of the active area of a system.
The conductor of the planar resonator structure may be wound at least once around the core. In certain circumstances, it may be preferred to wind at least three loops. The conductor can be any good conductor including conducting wire, Litz wire, conducting tubing, sheets, strips, gels, inks, traces and the like.
The size, shape, or dimensions of the active area of source may be further enhanced, altered, or modified with the use of materials that block, shield, or guide magnetic fields. To create non-symmetric active area around a source once side of the source may be covered with a magnetic shield to reduce the strength of the magnetic fields in a specific direction. The shield may be a conductor or a layered combination of conductor and magnetic material which can be used to guide magnetic fields away from a specific direction. Structures composed of layers of conductors and magnetic materials may be used to reduce energy losses that may occur due to shielding of the source.
The plurality of planar resonators may be integrated or combined into one planar resonator structure. A conductor or conductors may be wound around a core structure such that the loops formed by the two conductors are not coaxial. An example of such a structure is shown in FIG. 12 where two conductors 1201,1202 are wrapped around a planar rectangular core 1203 at orthogonal angles. The core may be rectangular or it may have various geometries with several extensions or protrusions. The protrusions may be useful for wrapping of a conductor, reducing the weight, size, or mass of the core, or may be used to enhance the directionality or omni-directionality of the resonator. A multi wrapped planar resonator with four protrusions is shown by the inner structure 1310 in FIG. 13, where four conductors 1301, 1302, 1303, 1304 are wrapped around the core. The core may have extensions 1305,1306,1307,1308 with one or more conductor loops. A single conductor may be wrapped around a core to form loops that are not coaxial. The four conductor loops of FIG. 13, for example, may be formed with one continuous piece of conductor, or using two conductors where a single conductor is used to make all coaxial loops.
Non-uniform or asymmetric field profiles around the resonator comprising a plurality of conductor loops may be generated by driving some conductor loops with non-identical parameters. Some conductor loops of a source resonator with a plurality of conductor loops may be driven by a power source with a different frequency, voltage, power level, duty cycle, and the like all of which may be used to affect the strength of the magnetic field generated by each conductor.
The planar resonator structures may be combined with a capacitively-loaded inductor resonator coil to provide an omni-directional active area all around, including above and below the source while maintaining a flat resonator structure. As shown in FIG. 13, an additional resonator loop coil 1309 comprising of a loop or loops of a conductor, may be placed in a common plane as the planar resonator structure 1310. The outer resonator coil provides an active area that is substantially above and below the source. The resonator coil can be arranged with any number of planar resonator structures and arrangements described herein.
The planar resonator structures may be enclosed in magnetically permeable packaging or integrated into other devices. The planar profile of the resonators within a single, common plane allows packaging and integration into flat devices. A diagram illustrating the application of the resonators is shown in FIG. 14. A flat source 1411 comprising one or more planar resonators 1414 each with one or more conductor loops may transfer power to devices 1412,1413 that are integrated with other planar resonators 1415,1416 and placed within an active area 1417 of the source. The devices may comprise a plurality of planar resonators such that regardless of the orientation of the device with respect to the source the active area of the source does not change. In addition to invariance to rotational misalignment, a flat device comprising of planar resonators may be turned upside down without substantially affecting the active area since the planar resonator is still in the plane of the source.
Another diagram illustrating a possible use of a power transfer system using the planar resonator structures is shown in FIG. 15. A planar source 1521 placed on top of a surface 1525 may create an active area that covers a substantial surface area creating an “energized surface” area. Devices such as computers 1524, mobile handsets 1522, games, and other electronics 1523 that are coupled to their respective planar device resonators may receive energy from the source when placed within the active area of the source, which may be anywhere on top of the surface. Several devices with different dimensions may be placed in the active area and used normally while charging or being powered from the source without having strict placement or alignment constraints. The source may be placed under the surface of a table, countertop, desk, cabinet, and the like, allowing it to be completely hidden while energizing the top surface of the table, countertop, desk, cabinet and the like, creating an active area on the surface that is much larger than the source.
The source may include a display or other visual, auditory, or vibration indicators to show the direction of charging devices or what devices are being charged, error or problems with charging, power levels, charging time, and the like.
The source resonators and circuitry may be integrated into any number of other devices. The source may be integrated into devices such as clocks, keyboards, monitors, picture frames, and the like. For example, a keyboard integrated with the planar resonators and appropriate power and control circuitry may be used as a source for devices placed around the keyboard such as computer mice, webcams, mobile handsets, and the like without occupying any additional desk space.
While the planar resonator structures have been described in the context of mobile devices it should be clear to those skilled in the art that a flat planar source for wireless power transfer with an active area that extends beyond its physical dimensions has many other consumer and industrial applications. The structures and configuration may be useful for a large number of applications where electronic or electric devices and a power source are typically located, positioned, or manipulated in substantially the same plane and alignment. Some of the possible application scenarios include devices on walls, floor, ceilings or any other substantially planar surfaces.
Flat source resonators may be integrated into a picture frame or hung on a wall thereby providing an active area within the plane of the wall where other electronic devices such as digital picture frames, televisions, lights, and the like can be mounted and powered without wires. Planar resonators may be integrated into a floor resulting in an energized floor or active area on the floor on which devices can be placed to receive power. Audio speakers, lamps, heaters, and the like can be placed within the active are and receive power wirelessly.
The planar resonator may have additional components coupled to the conductor. Components such as capacitors, inductors, resistors, diodes, and the like may be coupled to the conductor and may be used to adjust or tune the resonant frequency and the impedance matching for the resonators.
A planar resonator structure of the type described above and shown in FIG. 11A, may be created, for example, with a quality factor, Q, of 100 or higher and even Q of 1,000 or higher. Energy may be wirelessly transferred from one planar resonator structure to another over a distance larger than the characteristic size of the resonators, as shown in FIG. 11C.
In addition to utilizing magnetic materials to realize a structure with properties similar to the inductive element in the magnetic resonators, it may be possible to use a combination of good conductor materials and magnetic material to realize such inductive structures. FIG. 16A shows a magnetic resonator structure 1602 that may include one or more enclosures made of high-conductivity materials (the inside of which would be shielded from AC electromagnetic fields generated outside) surrounded by at least one layer of magnetic material and linked by blocks of magnetic material 1604.
A structure may include a high-conductivity sheet of material covered on one side by a layer of magnetic material. The layered structure may instead be applied conformally to an electronic device, so that parts of the device may be covered by the high-conductivity and magnetic material layers, while other parts that need to be easily accessed (such as buttons or screens) may be left uncovered. The structure may also or instead include only layers or bulk pieces of magnetic material. Thus, a magnetic resonator may be incorporated into an existing device without significantly interfering with its existing functions and with little or no need for extensive redesign. Moreover, the layers of good conductor and/or magnetic material may be made thin enough (of the order of a millimeter or less) that they would add little extra weight and volume to the completed device. An oscillating current applied to a length of conductor wound around the structure, as shown by the square loop in the center of the structure in FIG. 16A and FIG. 16B may be used to excite the electromagnetic fields associated with this structure.
Quality Factor of the Structure
A structure of the type described above may be created with a quality factor, Q, of the order of 1,000 or higher. This high-Q is possible even if the losses in the magnetic material are high, if the fraction of magnetic energy within the magnetic material is small compared to the total magnetic energy associated with the object. For structures composed of layers conducting materials and magnetic materials, the losses in the conducting materials may be reduced by the presence of the magnetic materials as described previously. In structures where the magnetic material layer's thickness is of the order of 1/100 of the largest dimension of the system (e.g., the magnetic material may be of the order of 1 mm thick, while the area of the structure is of the order of 10 cm×10 cm), and the relative permeability is of the order of 1,000, it is possible to make the fraction of magnetic energy contained within the magnetic material only a few hundredths of the total magnetic energy associated with the object or resonator. To see how that comes about, note that the expression for the magnetic energy contained in a volume is Um=∫VdrB(r)2/(2μr,μ0), so as long as B (rather than H) is the main field conserved across the magnetic material-air interface (which is typically the case in open magnetic circuits), the fraction of magnetic energy contained in the high-μr region may be significantly reduced compared to what it is in air.
If the fraction of magnetic energy in the magnetic material is denoted by frac, and the loss tangent of the material is tan δ, then the Q of the resonator, assuming the magnetic material is the only source of losses, is Q=1/(frac×tan δ). Thus, even for loss tangents as high as 0.1, it is possible to achieve Q's of the order of 1,000 for these types of resonator structures.
If the structure is driven with N turns of wire wound around it, the losses in the excitation inductor loop can be ignored if N is sufficiently high. FIG. 17 shows an equivalent circuit 1700 schematic for these structures and the scaling of the loss mechanisms and inductance with the number of turns, N, wound around a structure made of conducting and magnetic material. If proximity effects can be neglected (by using an appropriate winding, or a wire designed to minimize proximity effects, such as Litz wire and the like), the resistance 1702 due to the wire in the looped conductor scales linearly with the length of the loop, which is in turn proportional to the number of turns. On the other hand, both the equivalent resistance 1708 and equivalent inductance 1704 of these special structures are proportional to the square of the magnetic field inside the structure. Since this magnetic field is proportional to N, the equivalent resistance 1708 and equivalent inductance 1704 are both proportional to N2. Thus, for large enough N, the resistance 1702 of the wire is much smaller than the equivalent resistance 1708 of the magnetic structure, and the Q of the resonator asymptotes to Qmax=ωLμ/Rμ.
FIG. 16A shows a drawing of a copper and magnetic material structure 1602 driven by a square loop of current around the narrowed segment at the center of the structure 1604 and the magnetic field streamlines generated by this structure 1608. This exemplary structure includes two 20 cm×8 cm×2 cm hollow regions enclosed with copper and then completely covered with a 2 mm layer of magnetic material having the properties μ′r=1,400, μ′′r=5, and σ=0.5 S/m. These two parallelepipeds are spaced 4 cm apart and are connected by a 2 cm×4 cm×2 cm block of the same magnetic material. The excitation loop is wound around the center of this block. At a frequency of 300 kHz, this structure has a calculated Q of 890. The conductor and magnetic material structure may be shaped to optimize certain system parameters. For example, the size of the structure enclosed by the excitation loop may be small to reduce the resistance of the excitation loop, or it may be large to mitigate losses in the magnetic material associated with large magnetic fields. Note that the magnetic streamlines and Q's associated with the same structure composed of magnetic material only would be similar to the layer conductor and magnetic material design shown here.
Electromagnetic Resonators Interacting with Other Objects
For electromagnetic resonators, extrinsic loss mechanisms that perturb the intrinsic Q may include absorption losses inside the materials of nearby extraneous objects and radiation losses related to scattering of the resonant fields from nearby extraneous objects. Absorption losses may be associated with materials that, over the frequency range of interest, have non-zero, but finite, conductivity, σ, (or equivalently a non-zero and finite imaginary part of the dielectric permittivity), such that electromagnetic fields can penetrate it and induce currents in it, which then dissipate energy through resistive losses. An object may be described as lossy if it at least partly includes lossy materials.
Consider an object including a homogeneous isotropic material of conductivity, σ and magnetic permeability, μ. The penetration depth of electromagnetic fields inside this object is given by the skin depth, δ=√{square root over (2/ωμσ)}. The power dissipated inside the object, Pd, can be determined from Pd=∫V drσ|E|2=∫Vdr|J|2/σ where we made use of Ohm's law, J=σE, and where E is the electric field and J is the current density.
If over the frequency range of interest, the conductivity, σ, of the material that composes the object is low enough that the material's skin depth, δ, may be considered long, (i.e. δ is longer than the objects' characteristic size, or δ is longer than the characteristic size of the portion of the object that is lossy) then the electromagnetic fields, E and H, where H is the magnetic field, may penetrate significantly into the object. Then, these finite-valued fields may give rise to a dissipated power that scales as Pd ̃σVol|E|2, where Vol is the volume of the object that is lossy and |E|2 is the spatial average of the electric-field squared, in the volume under consideration. Therefore, in the low-conductivity limit, the dissipated power scales proportionally to the conductivity and goes to zero in the limit of a non-conducting (purely dielectric) material.
If over the frequency range of interest, the conductivity, σ, of the material that composes the object is high enough that the material's skin depth may be considered short, then the electromagnetic fields, E and H, may penetrate only a short distance into the object (namely they stay close to the ‘skin’ of the material, where δ is smaller than the characteristic thickness of the portion of the object that is lossy). In this case, the currents induced inside the material may be concentrated very close to the material surface, approximately within a skin depth, and their magnitude may be approximated by the product of a surface current density (mostly determined by the shape of the incident electromagnetic fields and, as long as the thickness of the conductor is much larger than the skin-depth, independent of frequency and conductivity to first order) K(x, y) (where x and y are coordinates parameterizing the surface) and a function decaying exponentially into the surface: exp(−z/δ)/δ (where z denotes the coordinate locally normal to the surface): J(x,y,z)=K(x,y)exp(—z/δ)/δ. Then, the dissipated power, Pd, may be estimated by,

Pd=vdr|J(r)|2/σ≅(sdxdy|K(x,y)|2)(0∞dz exp(2z/δ)/(σδ2))=√{square root over (μω/8σ)}(sdxdy|K(x,y)|2)

Therefore, in the high-conductivity limit, the dissipated power scales inverse proportionally to the square-root of the conductivity and goes to zero in the limit of a perfectly-conducting material.
If over the frequency range of interest, the conductivity, σ, of the material that composes the object is finite, then the material's skin depth, δ, may penetrate some distance into the object and some amount of power may be dissipated inside the object, depending also on the size of the object and the strength of the electromagnetic fields. This description can be generalized to also describe the general case of an object including multiple different materials with different properties and conductivities, such as an object with an arbitrary inhomogeneous and anisotropic distribution of the conductivity inside the object.
Note that the magnitude of the loss mechanisms described above may depend on the location and orientation of the extraneous objects relative to the resonator fields as well as the material composition of the extraneous objects. For example, high-conductivity materials may shift the resonant frequency of a resonator and detune it from other resonant objects. This frequency shift may be fixed by applying a feedback mechanism to a resonator that corrects its frequency, such as through changes in the inductance and/or capacitance of the resonator. These changes may be realized using variable capacitors and inductors, in some cases achieved by changes in the geometry of components in the resonators. Other novel tuning mechanisms, described below, may also be used to change the resonator frequency.
Where external losses are high, the perturbed Q may be low and steps may be taken to limit the absorption of resonator energy inside such extraneous objects and materials. Because of the functional dependence of the dissipated power on the strength of the electric and magnetic fields, one might optimize system performance by designing a system so that the desired coupling is achieved with shorter evanescent resonant field tails at the source resonator and longer at the device resonator, so that the perturbed Q of the source in the presence of other objects is optimized (or vice versa if the perturbed Q of the device needs to be optimized).
Note that many common extraneous materials and objects such as people, animals, plants, building materials, and the like, may have low conductivities and therefore may have little impact on the wireless energy transfer scheme disclosed here. An important fact related to the magnetic resonator designs we describe is that their electric fields may be confined primarily within the resonator structure itself, so it should be possible to operate within the commonly accepted guidelines for human safety while providing wireless power exchange over mid range distances.
Electromagnetic Resonators with Reduced Interactions
One frequency range of interest for near-field wireless power transmission is between 10 kHz and 100 MHz. In this frequency range, a large variety of ordinary non-metallic materials, such as for example several types of wood and plastic may have relatively low conductivity, such that only small amounts of power may be dissipated inside them. In addition, materials with low loss tangents, tan Δ, where tan Δ=∈′′/∈′, and ∈′′ and ∈′ are the imaginary and real parts of the permittivity respectively, may also have only small amounts of power dissipated inside them. Metallic materials, such as copper, silver, gold, and the like, with relatively high conductivity, may also have little power dissipated in them, because electromagnetic fields are not able to significantly penetrate these materials, as discussed earlier. These very high and very low conductivity materials, and low loss tangent materials and objects may have a negligible impact on the losses of a magnetic resonator.
However, in the frequency range of interest, there are materials and objects such as some electronic circuits and some lower-conductivity metals, which may have moderate (in general inhomogeneous and anisotropic) conductivity, and/or moderate to high loss tangents, and which may have relatively high dissipative losses. Relatively larger amounts of power may be dissipated inside them. These materials and objects may dissipate enough energy to reduce Q(p) by non-trivial amounts, and may be referred to as “lossy objects”.
One way to reduce the impact of lossy materials on the Q(p) of a resonator is to use high-conductivity materials to shape the resonator fields such that they avoid the lossy objects. The process of using high-conductivity materials to tailor electromagnetic fields so that they avoid lossy objects in their vicinity may be understood by visualizing high-conductivity materials as materials that deflect or reshape the fields. This picture is qualitatively correct as long as the thickness of the conductor is larger than the skin-depth because the boundary conditions for electromagnetic fields at the surface of a good conductor force the electric field to be nearly completely perpendicular to, and the magnetic field to be nearly completely tangential to, the conductor surface. Therefore, a perpendicular magnetic field or a tangential electric field will be “deflected away” from the conducting surface. Furthermore, even a tangential magnetic field or a perpendicular electric field may be forced to decrease in magnitude on one side and/or in particular locations of the conducting surface, depending on the relative position of the sources of the fields and the conductive surface.
As an example, FIG. 18 shows a finite element method (FEM) simulation of two high conductivity surfaces 1802 above and below a lossy dielectric material 1804 in an external, initially uniform, magnetic field of frequency f=6.78 MHz. The system is azimuthally symmetric around the r=0 axis. In this simulation, the lossy dielectric material 1804 is sandwiched between two conductors 1802, shown as the white lines at approximately z=±0.01 m. In the absence of the conducting surfaces above and below the dielectric disk, the magnetic field (represented by the drawn magnetic field lines) would have remained essentially uniform (field lines straight and parallel with the z-axis), indicating that the magnetic field would have passed straight through the lossy dielectric material. In this case, power would have been dissipated in the lossy dielectric disk. In the presence of conducting surfaces, however, this simulation shows the magnetic field is reshaped. The magnetic field is forced to be tangential to surface of the conductor and so is deflected around those conducting surfaces 1802, minimizing the amount of power that may be dissipated in the lossy dielectric material 1804 behind or between the conducting surfaces. As used herein, an axis of electrical symmetry refers to any axis about which a fixed or time-varying electrical or magnetic field is substantially symmetric during an exchange of energy as disclosed herein.
A similar effect is observed even if only one conducting surface, above or below, the dielectric disk, is used. If the dielectric disk is thin, the fact that the electric field is essentially zero at the surface, and continuous and smooth close to it, means that the electric field is very low everywhere close to the surface (i.e. within the dielectric disk). A single surface implementation for deflecting resonator fields away from lossy objects may be preferred for applications where one is not allowed to cover both sides of the lossy material or object (e.g. an LCD screen). Note that even a very thin surface of conducting material, on the order of a few skin-depths, may be sufficient (the skin depth in pure copper at 6.78 MHz is  ̃20 μm, and at 250 kHz is  ̃100 μm) to significantly improve the Q(p) of a resonator in the presence of lossy materials.
Lossy extraneous materials and objects may be parts of an apparatus, in which a high-Q resonator is to be integrated. The dissipation of energy in these lossy materials and objects may be reduced by a number of techniques including:

    
    
        by positioning the lossy materials and objects away from the resonator, or, in special positions and orientations relative to the resonator.
        by using a high conductivity material or structure to partly or entirely cover lossy materials and objects in the vicinity of a resonator
        by placing a closed surface (such as a sheet or a mesh) of high-conductivity material around a lossy object to completely cover the lossy object and shape the resonator fields such that they avoid the lossy object.
        by placing a surface (such as a sheet or a mesh) of a high-conductivity material around only a portion of a lossy object, such as along the top, the bottom, along the side, and the like, of an object or material.
        by placing even a single surface (such as a sheet or a mesh) of high-conductivity material above or below or on one side of a lossy object to reduce the strength of the fields at the location of the lossy object.
    
    


FIG. 19 shows a capacitively-loaded loop inductor forming a magnetic resonator 102 and a disk-shaped surface of high-conductivity material 1802 that completely surrounds a lossy object 1804 placed inside the loop inductor. Note that some lossy objects may be components, such as electronic circuits, that may need to interact with, communicate with, or be connected to the outside environment and thus cannot be completely electromagnetically isolated. Partially covering a lossy material with high conductivity materials may still reduce extraneous losses while enabling the lossy material or object to function properly.
FIG. 20 shows a capacitively-loaded loop inductor that is used as the resonator 102 and a surface of high-conductivity material 1802, surrounding only a portion of a lossy object 1804, that is placed inside the inductor loop.
Extraneous losses may be reduced, but may not be completely eliminated, by placing a single surface of high-conductivity material above, below, on the side, and the like, of a lossy object or material. An example is shown in FIG. 21, where a capacitively-loaded loop inductor is used as the resonator 102 and a surface of high-conductivity material 1802 is placed inside the inductor loop under a lossy object 1804 to reduce the strength of the fields at the location of the lossy object. It may be preferable to cover only one side of a material or object because of considerations of cost, weight, assembly complications, air flow, visual access, physical access, and the like.
A single surface of high-conductivity material may be used to avoid objects that cannot or should not be covered from both sides (e.g. LCD or plasma screens). Such lossy objects may be avoided using optically transparent conductors. High-conductivity optically opaque materials may instead be placed on only a portion of the lossy object, instead of, or in addition to, optically transparent conductors. The adequacy of single-sided vs. multi-sided covering implementations, and the design trade-offs inherent therein may depend on the details of the wireless energy transfer scenario and the properties of the lossy materials and objects.
Below we describe an example using high-conductivity surfaces to improve the Q-insensitivity, Θ(p), of an integrated magnetic resonator used in a wireless energy-transfer system. FIG. 22 shows a wireless projector 2200. The wireless projector may include a device resonator 102C, a projector 2202, a wireless network/video adapter 2204, and power conversion circuits 2208, arranged as shown. The device resonator 102C may include a three-turn conductor loop, arranged to enclose a surface, and a capacitor network 2210. The conductor loop may be designed so that the device resonator 102C has a high Q (e.g., >100) at its operating resonant frequency. Prior to integration in the completely wireless projector 2200, this device resonator 102C has a Q of approximately 477 at the designed operating resonant frequency of 6.78 MHz. Upon integration, and placing the wireless network/video adapter card 2204 in the center of the resonator loop inductor, the resonator Q(integrated) was decreased to approximately 347. At least some of the reduction from Q to Q(integrated) was attributed to losses in the perturbing wireless network/video adapter card. As described above, electromagnetic fields associated with the magnetic resonator 102C may induce currents in and on the wireless network/video adapter card 2204, which may be dissipated in resistive losses in the lossy materials that compose the card. We observed that Q(integrated) of the resonator may be impacted differently depending on the composition, position, and orientation, of objects and materials placed in its vicinity.
In a completely wireless projector example, covering the network/video adapter card with a thin copper pocket (a folded sheet of copper that covered the top and the bottom of the wireless network/video adapter card, but not the communication antenna) improved the Q(integrated) of the magnetic resonator to a Q(integrated+copper pocket) of approximately 444. In other words, most of the reduction in Q(integrated) due to the perturbation caused by the extraneous network/video adapter card could be eliminated using a copper pocket to deflect the resonator fields away from the lossy materials.
In another completely wireless projector example, covering the network/video adapter card with a single copper sheet placed beneath the card provided a Q(Integrated+copper sheet) approximately equal to Q(integrated+copper pocket). In that example, the high perturbed Q of the system could be maintained with a single high-conductivity sheet used to deflect the resonator fields away from the lossy adapter card.
It may be advantageous to position or orient lossy materials or objects, which are part of an apparatus including a high-Q electromagnetic resonator, in places where the fields produced by the resonator are relatively weak, so that little or no power may be dissipated in these objects and so that the Q-insensitivity, Θ(p), may be large. As was shown earlier, materials of different conductivity may respond differently to electric versus magnetic fields. Therefore, according to the conductivity of the extraneous object, the positioning technique may be specialized to one or the other field.
FIG. 23 shows the magnitude of the electric 2312 and magnetic fields 2314 along a line that contains the diameter of the circular loop inductor and the electric 2318 and magnetic fields 2320 along the axis of the loop inductor for a capacitively-loaded circular loop inductor of wire of radius 30 cm, resonant at 10 MHz. It can be seen that the amplitude of the resonant near-fields reach their maxima close to the wire and decay away from the loop, 2312, 2314. In the plane of the loop inductor 2318, 2320, the fields reach a local minimum at the center of the loop. Therefore, given the finite size of the apparatus, it may be that the fields are weakest at the extrema of the apparatus or it may be that the field magnitudes have local minima somewhere within the apparatus. This argument holds for any other type of electromagnetic resonator 102 and any type of apparatus. Examples are shown in FIG. 24A and FIG. 24B, where a capacitively-loaded inductor loop forms a magnetic resonator 102 and an extraneous lossy object 1804 is positioned where the electromagnetic fields have minimum magnitude.
In a demonstration example, a magnetic resonator was formed using a three-turn conductor loop, arranged to enclose a square surface (with rounded corners), and a capacitor network. The Q of the resonator was approximately 619 at the designed operating resonant frequency of 6.78 MHz. The perturbed Q of this resonator depended on the placement of the perturbing object, in this case a pocket projector, relative to the resonator. When the perturbing projector was located inside the inductor loop and at its center or on top of the inductor wire turns, Q(projector) was approximately 96, lower than when the perturbing projector was placed outside of the resonator, in which case Q(projector) was approximately 513. These measurements support the analysis that shows the fields inside the inductor loop may be larger than those outside it, so lossy objects placed inside such a loop inductor may yield lower perturbed Q's for the system than when the lossy object is placed outside the loop inductor. Depending on the resonator designs and the material composition and orientation of the lossy object, the arrangement shown in FIG. 24B may yield a higher Q-insensitivity, Θ(projector), than the arrangement shown in FIG. 24A.
High-Q resonators may be integrated inside an apparatus. Extraneous materials and objects of high dielectric permittivity, magnetic permeability, or electric conductivity may be part of the apparatus into which a high-Q resonator is to be integrated. For these extraneous materials and objects in the vicinity of a high-Q electromagnetic resonator, depending on their size, position and orientation relative to the resonator, the resonator field-profile may be distorted and deviate significantly from the original unperturbed field-profile of the resonator. Such a distortion of the unperturbed fields of the resonator may significantly decrease the Q to a lower Q(p), even if the extraneous objects and materials are lossless.
It may be advantageous to position high-conductivity objects, which are part of an apparatus including a high-Q electromagnetic resonator, at orientations such that the surfaces of these objects are, as much as possible, perpendicular to the electric field lines produced by the unperturbed resonator and parallel to the magnetic field lines produced by the unperturbed resonator, thus distorting the resonant field profiles by the smallest amount possible. Other common objects that may be positioned perpendicular to the plane of a magnetic resonator loop include screens (LCD, plasma, etc), batteries, cases, connectors, radiative antennas, and the like. The Q-insensitivity, Θ(p), of the resonator may be much larger than if the objects were positioned at a different orientation with respect to the resonator fields.
Lossy extraneous materials and objects, which are not part of the integrated apparatus including a high-Q resonator, may be located or brought in the vicinity of the resonator, for example, during the use of the apparatus. It may be advantageous in certain circumstances to use high conductivity materials to tailor the resonator fields so that they avoid the regions where lossy extraneous objects may be located or introduced to reduce power dissipation in these materials and objects and to increase Q-insensitivity, Θ(p). An example is shown in FIG. 25, where a capacitively-loaded loop inductor and capacitor are used as the resonator 102 and a surface of high-conductivity material 1802 is placed above the inductor loop to reduce the magnitude of the fields in the region above the resonator, where lossy extraneous objects 1804 may be located or introduced.
Note that a high-conductivity surface brought in the vicinity of a resonator to reshape the fields may also lead to Q(cond. surface)<Q. The reduction in the perturbed Q may be due to the dissipation of energy inside the lossy conductor or to the distortion of the unperturbed resonator field profiles associated with matching the field boundary conditions at the surface of the conductor. Therefore, while a high-conductivity surface may be used to reduce the extraneous losses due to dissipation inside an extraneous lossy object, in some cases, especially in some of those where this is achieved by significantly reshaping the electromagnetic fields, using such a high-conductivity surface so that the fields avoid the lossy object may result effectively in Q(p+cond. surface)<Q(p) rather than the desired result Q(p+cond. surface)>Q(p).
As described above, in the presence of loss inducing objects, the perturbed quality factor of a magnetic resonator may be improved if the electromagnetic fields associated with the magnetic resonator are reshaped to avoid the loss inducing objects. Another way to reshape the unperturbed resonator fields is to use high permeability materials to completely or partially enclose or cover the loss inducing objects, thereby reducing the interaction of the magnetic field with the loss inducing objects.
Magnetic field shielding has been described previously, for example in Electrodynamics 3rd Ed., Jackson, pp. 201-203. There, a spherical shell of magnetically permeable material was shown to shield its interior from external magnetic fields. For example, if a shell of inner radius a, outer radius b, and relative permeability μr, is placed in an initially uniform magnetic field H0, then the field inside the shell will have a constant magnitude, 9μrH0/[(2μr+1)(μr+2)−2(a/b)3(μr−1)2], which tends to 9H0/2μr(1−(a/b) if μr>>1. This result shows that an incident magnetic field (but not necessarily an incident electric field) may be greatly attenuated inside the shell, even if the shell is quite thin, provided the magnetic permeability is high enough. It may be advantageous in certain circumstances to use high permeability materials to partly or entirely cover lossy materials and objects so that they are avoided by the resonator magnetic fields and so that little or no power is dissipated in these materials and objects. In such an approach, the Q-insensitivity, Θ(p), may be larger than if the materials and objects were not covered, possibly larger than 1.
It may be desirable to keep both the electric and magnetic fields away from loss inducing objects. As described above, one way to shape the fields in such a manner is to use high-conductivity surfaces to either completely or partially enclose or cover the loss inducing objects. A layer of magnetically permeable material, also referred to as magnetic material, (any material or meta-material having a non-trivial magnetic permeability), may be placed on or around the high-conductivity surfaces. The additional layer of magnetic material may present a lower reluctance path (compared to free space) for the deflected magnetic field to follow and may partially shield the electric conductor underneath it from the incident magnetic flux. This arrangement may reduce the losses due to induced currents in the high-conductivity surface. Under some circumstances the lower reluctance path presented by the magnetic material may improve the perturbed Q of the structure.
FIG. 26A shows an axially symmetric FEM simulation of a thin conducting 2604 (copper) disk (20 cm in diameter, 2 cm in height) exposed to an initially uniform, externally applied magnetic field (gray flux lines) along the z-axis. The axis of symmetry is at r=0. The magnetic streamlines shown originate at z=∞, where they are spaced from r=3 cm to r=10 cm in intervals of 1 cm. The axes scales are in meters. Imagine, for example, that this conducing cylinder encloses loss-inducing objects within an area circumscribed by a magnetic resonator in a wireless energy transfer system such as shown in FIG. 19.
This high-conductivity enclosure may increase the perturbing Q of the lossy objects and therefore the overall perturbed Q of the system, but the perturbed Q may still be less than the unperturbed Q because of induced losses in the conducting surface and changes to the profile of the electromagnetic fields. Decreases in the perturbed Q associated with the high-conductivity enclosure may be at least partially recovered by including a layer of magnetic material along the outer surface or surfaces of the high-conductivity enclosure. FIG. 26B shows an axially symmetric FEM simulation of the thin conducting 2604A (copper) disk (20 cm in diameter, 2 cm in height) from FIG. 26A, but with an additional layer of magnetic material placed directly on the outer surface of the high-conductivity enclosure. Note that the presence of the magnetic material may provide a lower reluctance path for the magnetic field, thereby at least partially shielding the underlying conductor and reducing losses due to induced eddy currents in the conductor.
FIG. 27 depicts a variation (in axi-symmetric view) to the system shown in FIG. 26A and FIG. 26B where not all of the lossy material 2708 may be covered by a high-conductivity surface 2706. In certain circumstances it may be useful to cover only one side of a material or object, such as due to considerations of cost, weight, assembly complications, air flow, visual access, physical access, and the like. In the exemplary arrangement shown in FIG. 27, only one surface of the lossy material 2708 is covered and the resonator inductor loop is placed on the opposite side of the high-conductivity surface.
Mathematical models were used to simulate a high-conductivity enclosure made of copper and shaped like a 20 cm diameter by 2 cm high cylindrical disk placed within an area circumscribed by a magnetic resonator whose inductive element was a single-turn wire loop with loop radius r=11 cm and wire radius a=1 mm. Simulations for an applied 6.78 MHz electromagnetic field suggest that the perturbing quality factor of this high-conductivity enclosure, δQ(enclosure), is 1,870. When the high-conductivity enclosure was modified to include a 0.25 cm-thick layer of magnetic material with real relative permeability, μ′r=40, and imaginary relative permeability, μ′′r=10−2, simulations suggest the perturbing quality factor is increased to δQ(enclosure+magnetic material)=5,060.
The improvement in performance due to the addition of thin layers of magnetic material 2702 may be even more dramatic if the high-conductivity enclosure fills a larger portion of the area circumscribed by the resonator's loop inductor 2704. In the example above, if the radius of the inductor loop 2704 is reduced so that it is only 3 mm away from the surface of the high-conductivity enclosure, the perturbing quality factor may be improved from 670 (conducting enclosure only) to 2,730 (conducting enclosure with a thin layer of magnetic material) by the addition of a thin layer of magnetic material 2702 around the outside of the enclosure.
The resonator structure may be designed to have highly confined electric fields, using shielding, or distributed capacitors, for example, which may yield high, even when the resonator is very close to materials that would typically induce loss.
Coupled Electromagnetic Resonators
The efficiency of energy transfer between two resonators may be determined by the strong-coupling figure-of-merit, U=κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}=(2κ/√{square root over (ωsωd)})√{square root over (QsQd)}. In magnetic resonator implementations the coupling factor between the two resonators may be related to the inductance of the inductive elements in each of the resonators, L1 and L2, and the mutual inductance, M, between them by κ12=ωM/2√{square root over (L1L2)}. Note that this expression assumes there is negligible coupling through electric-dipole coupling. For capacitively-loaded inductor loop resonators where the inductor loops are formed by circular conducting loops with N turns, separated by a distance D, and oriented as shown in FIG. 1B, the mutual inductance is M=π/4·μoN1N2(x1x2)2/D3 where x1, N1 and x2, N2 are the characteristic size and number of turns of the conductor loop of the first and second resonators respectively. Note that this is a quasi-static result, and so assumes that the resonator's size is much smaller than the wavelength and the resonators' distance is much smaller than the wavelength, but also that their distance is at least a few times their size. For these circular resonators operated in the quasi-static limit and at mid-range distances, as described above, k=2κ√{square root over (ω1ω2)} ̃(√{square root over (x1x2)}/D)3. Strong coupling (a large U) between resonators at mid-range distances may be established when the quality factors of the resonators are large enough to compensate for the small k at mid-range distances
For electromagnetic resonators, if the two resonators include conducting parts, the coupling mechanism may be that currents are induced on one resonator due to electric and magnetic fields generated from the other. The coupling factor may be proportional to the flux of the magnetic field produced from the high-Q inductive element in one resonator crossing a closed area of the high-Q inductive element of the second resonator.
Coupled Electromagnetic Resonators with Reduced Interactions
As described earlier, a high-conductivity material surface may be used to shape resonator fields such that they avoid lossy objects, p, in the vicinity of a resonator, thereby reducing the overall extraneous losses and maintaining a high Q-insensitivity Θ(p+cond. surface) of the resonator. However, such a surface may also lead to a perturbed coupling factor, k(p+cond. surface), between resonators that is smaller than the perturbed coupling factor, k(p) and depends on the size, position, and orientation of the high-conductivity material relative to the resonators. For example, if high-conductivity materials are placed in the plane and within the area circumscribed by the inductive element of at least one of the magnetic resonators in a wireless energy transfer system, some of the magnetic flux through the area of the resonator, mediating the coupling, may be blocked and k may be reduced.
Consider again the example of FIG. 19. In the absence of the high-conductivity disk enclosure, a certain amount of the external magnetic flux may cross the circumscribed area of the loop. In the presence of the high-conductivity disk enclosure, some of this magnetic flux may be deflected or blocked and may no longer cross the area of the loop, thus leading to a smaller perturbed coupling factor k12(p+cond. surfaces). However, because the deflected magnetic-field lines may follow the edges of the high-conductivity surfaces closely, the reduction in the flux through the loop circumscribing the disk may be less than the ratio of the areas of the face of the disk to the area of the loop.
One may use high-conductivity material structures, either alone, or combined with magnetic materials to optimize perturbed quality factors, perturbed coupling factors, or perturbed efficiencies.
Consider the example of FIG. 21. Let the lossy object have a size equal to the size of the capacitively-loaded inductor loop resonator, thus filling its area A 2102. A high-conductivity surface 1802 may be placed under the lossy object 1804. Let this be resonator 1 in a system of two coupled resonators 1 and 2, and let us consider how U12(object+cond. surface) scales compared to U12 as the area As 2104 of the conducting surface increases. Without the conducting surface 1802 below the lossy object 1804, the k-insensitivity, β12(object), may be approximately one, but the Q-insensitivity, Θ1(object), may be small, so the U-insensitivity Ξ12(object) may be small.
Where the high-conductivity surface below the lossy object covers the entire area of the inductor loop resonator (As=A), k12(object+cond. surface) may approach zero, because little flux is allowed to cross the inductor loop, so U12(object+cond. surface) may approach zero. For intermediate sizes of the high-conductivity surface, the suppression of extrinsic losses and the associated Q-insensitivity, Θ1(object+cond. surface), may be large enough compared to Θ1(object), while the reduction in coupling may not be significant and the associated k-insensitivity, β12(object+cond. surface), may be not much smaller than β12(object), so that the overall U12(object+cond. surface) may be increased compared to U12(object). The optimal degree of avoiding of extraneous lossy objects via high-conductivity surfaces in a system of wireless energy transfer may depend on the details of the system configuration and the application.
We describe using high-conductivity materials to either completely or partially enclose or cover loss inducing objects in the vicinity of high-Q resonators as one potential method to achieve high perturbed Q's for a system. However, using a good conductor alone to cover the objects may reduce the coupling of the resonators as described above, thereby reducing the efficiency of wireless power transfer. As the area of the conducting surface approaches the area of the magnetic resonator, for example, the perturbed coupling factor, k(p), may approach zero, making the use of the conducting surface incompatible with efficient wireless power transfer.
One approach to addressing the aforementioned problem is to place a layer of magnetic material around the high-conductivity materials because the additional layer of permeable material may present a lower reluctance path (compared to free space) for the deflected magnetic field to follow and may partially shield the electric conductor underneath it from incident magnetic flux. Under some circumstances the lower reluctance path presented by the magnetic material may improve the electromagnetic coupling of the resonator to other resonators. Decreases in the perturbed coupling factor associated with using conducting materials to tailor resonator fields so that they avoid lossy objects in and around high-Q magnetic resonators may be at least partially recovered by including a layer of magnetic material along the outer surface or surfaces of the conducting materials. The magnetic materials may increase the perturbed coupling factor relative to its initial unperturbed value.
Note that the simulation results in FIG. 26A and FIG. 26B show that an incident magnetic field may be deflected less by a layered magnetic material and conducting structure than by a conducting structure alone. If a magnetic resonator loop with a radius only slightly larger than that of the disks shown in FIG. 26A and FIG. 26B circumscribed the disks, it is clear that more flux lines would be captured in the case illustrated in FIG. 26B than in FIG. 26A, and therefore k(disk) would be larger for the case illustrated in FIG. 26B. Therefore, including a layer of magnetic material on the conducting material may improve the overall system performance. System analyses may be performed to determine whether these materials should be partially, totally, or minimally integrated into the resonator.
As described above, FIG. 27 depicts a layered conductor 2706 and magnetic material 2702 structure that may be appropriate for use when not all of a lossy material 2708 may be covered by a conductor and/or magnetic material structure. It was shown earlier that for a copper conductor disk with a 20 cm diameter and a 2 cm height, circumscribed by a resonator with an inductor loop radius of 11 cm and a wire radius a=1 mm, the calculated perturbing Q for the copper cylinder was 1,870. If the resonator and the conducting disk shell are placed in a uniform magnetic field (aligned along the axis of symmetry of the inductor loop), we calculate that the copper conductor has an associated coupling factor insensitivity of 0.34. For comparison, we model the same arrangement but include a 0.25 cm-thick layer of magnetic material with a real relative permeability, μ′r=40, and an imaginary relative permeability, μ′′r=10−2. Using the same model and parameters described above, we find that the coupling factor insensitivity is improved to 0.64 by the addition of the magnetic material to the surface of the conductor.
Magnetic materials may be placed within the area circumscribed by the magnetic resonator to increase the coupling in wireless energy transfer systems. Consider a solid sphere of a magnetic material with relative permeability, μr, placed in an initially uniform magnetic field. In this example, the lower reluctance path offered by the magnetic material may cause the magnetic field to concentrate in the volume of the sphere. We find that the magnetic flux through the area circumscribed by the equator of the sphere is enhanced by a factor of 3μr/(μr+2), by the addition of the magnetic material. If μr>>1, this enhancement factor may be close to 3.
One can also show that the dipole moment of a system comprising the magnetic sphere circumscribed by the inductive element in a magnetic resonator would have its magnetic dipole enhanced by the same factor. Thus, the magnetic sphere with high permeability practically triples the dipole magnetic coupling of the resonator. It is possible to keep most of this increase in coupling if we use a spherical shell of magnetic material with inner radius a, and outer radius b, even if this shell is on top of block or enclosure made from highly conducting materials. In this case, the enhancement in the flux through the equator is




  
    
      3
      ⁢
      
        
          μ
          r
        
        ⁡
        
          (
          
            1
            -
            
              
                (
                
                  a
                  b
                
                )
              
              3
            
          
          )
        
      
    
    
      
        
          μ
          r
        
        ⁡
        
          (
          
            1
            -
            
              
                (
                
                  a
                  b
                
                )
              
              3
            
          
          )
        
      
      +
      
        2
        ⁢
        
          (
          
            1
            +
            
              
                1
                2
              
              ⁢
              
                
                  (
                  
                    a
                    b
                  
                  )
                
                3
              
            
          
          )
        
      
    
  
  .




For μr=1,000 and (a/b)=0.99, this enhancement factor is still 2.73, so it possible to significantly improve the coupling even with thin layers of magnetic material.

As described above, structures containing magnetic materials may be used to realize magnetic resonators. FIG. 16A shows a 3 dimensional model of a copper and magnetic material structure 1600 driven by a square loop of current around the choke point at its center. FIG. 16B shows the interaction, indicated by magnetic field streamlines, between two identical structures 1600A-B with the same properties as the one shown in FIG. 16A. Because of symmetry, and to reduce computational complexity, only one half of the system is modeled. If we fix the relative orientation between the two objects and vary their center-to-center distance (the image shown is at a relative separation of 50 cm), we find that, at 300 kHz, the coupling efficiency varies from 87% to 55% as the separation between the structures varies from 30 cm to 60 cm. Each of the example structures shown 1600 A-B includes two 20 cm×8 cm×2 cm parallelepipeds made of copper joined by a 4 cm×4 cm×2 cm block of magnetic material and entirely covered with a 2 mm layer of the same magnetic material (assumed to have μr=1,400+j5). Resistive losses in the driving loop are ignored. Each structure has a calculated Q of 815.
Electromagnetic Resonators and Impedance Matching
Impedance Matching Architectures for Low-Loss Inductive Elements
For purposes of the present discussion, an inductive element may be any coil or loop structure (the ‘loop’) of any conducting material, with or without a (gapped or ungapped) core made of magnetic material, which may also be coupled inductively or in any other contactless way to other systems. The element is inductive because its impedance, including both the impedance of the loop and the so-called ‘reflected’ impedances of any potentially coupled systems, has positive reactance, X, and resistance, R.
Consider an external circuit, such as a driving circuit or a driven load or a transmission line, to which an inductive element may be connected. The external circuit (e.g. a driving circuit) may be delivering power to the inductive element and the inductive element may be delivering power to the external circuit (e.g. a driven load). The efficiency and amount of power delivered between the inductive element and the external circuit at a desired frequency may depend on the impedance of the inductive element relative to the properties of the external circuit. Impedance-matching networks and external circuit control techniques may be used to regulate the power delivery between the external circuit and the inductive element, at a desired frequency, f.
The external circuit may be a driving circuit configured to form an amplifier of class A, B, C, D, DE, E, F and the like, and may deliver power at maximum efficiency (namely with minimum losses within the driving circuit) when it is driving a resonant network with specific impedance Z*o, where Zo may be complex and * denotes complex conjugation. The external circuit may be a driven load configured to form a rectifier of class A, B, C, D, DE, E, F and the like, and may receive power at maximum efficiency (namely with minimum losses within the driven load) when it is driven by a resonant network with specific impedance Z*o, where Zo may be complex. The external circuit may be a transmission line with characteristic impedance, Zo, and may exchange power at maximum efficiency (namely with zero reflections) when connected to an impedance Z*o. We will call the characteristic impedance Zo of an external circuit the complex conjugate of the impedance that may be connected to it for power exchange at maximum efficiency.
Typically the impedance of an inductive element R+jX, may be much different from Z*o. For example, if the inductive element has low loss (a high X/R), its resistance, R, may be much lower than the real part of the characteristic impedance, Z0, of the external circuit. Furthermore, an inductive element by itself may not be a resonant network. An impedance-matching network connected to an inductive element may typically create a resonant network, whose impedance may be regulated.
Therefore, an impedance-matching network may be designed to maximize the efficiency of the power delivered between the external circuit and the inductive element (including the reflected impedances of any coupled systems). The efficiency of delivered power may be maximized by matching the impedance of the combination of an impedance-matching network and an inductive element to the characteristic impedance of an external circuit (or transmission line) at the desired frequency.
An impedance-matching network may be designed to deliver a specified amount of power between the external circuit and the inductive element (including the reflected impedances of any coupled systems). The delivered power may be determined by adjusting the complex ratio of the impedance of the combination of the impedance-matching network and the inductive element to the impedance of the external circuit (or transmission line) at the desired frequency.
Impedance-matching networks connected to inductive elements may create magnetic resonators. For some applications, such as wireless power transmission using strongly-coupled magnetic resonators, a high Q may be desired for the resonators. Therefore, the inductive element may be chosen to have low losses (high X/R).
Since the matching circuit may typically include additional sources of loss inside the resonator, the components of the matching circuit may also be chosen to have low losses. Furthermore, in high-power applications and/or due to the high resonator Q, large currents may run in parts of the resonator circuit and large voltages may be present across some circuit elements within the resonator. Such currents and voltages may exceed the specified tolerances for particular circuit elements and may be too high for particular components to withstand. In some cases, it may be difficult to find or implement components, such as tunable capacitors for example, with size, cost and performance (loss and current/voltage-rating) specifications sufficient to realize high-Q and high-power resonator designs for certain applications. We disclose matching circuit designs, methods, implementations and techniques that may preserve the high Q for magnetic resonators, while reducing the component requirements for low loss and/or high current/voltage-rating.
Matching-circuit topologies may be designed that minimize the loss and current-rating requirements on some of the elements of the matching circuit. The topology of a circuit matching a low-loss inductive element to an impedance, Z0, may be chosen so that some of its components lie outside the associated high-Q resonator by being in series with the external circuit. The requirements for low series loss or high current-ratings for these components may be reduced. Relieving the low series loss and/or high-current-rating requirement on a circuit element may be particularly useful when the element needs to be variable and/or to have a large voltage-rating and/or low parallel loss.
Matching-circuit topologies may be designed that minimize the voltage rating requirements on some of the elements of the matching circuit. The topology of a circuit matching a low-loss inductive element to an impedance, Z0, may be chosen so that some of its components lie outside the associated high-Q resonator by being in parallel with Z0. The requirements for low parallel loss or high voltage-rating for these components may be reduced. Relieving the low parallel loss and/or high-voltage requirement on a circuit element may be particularly useful when the element needs to be variable and/or to have a large current-rating and/or low series loss.
The topology of the circuit matching a low-loss inductive element to an external characteristic impedance, Z0, may be chosen so that the field pattern of the associated resonant mode and thus its high Q are preserved upon coupling of the resonator to the external impedance. Otherwise inefficient coupling to the desired resonant mode may occur (potentially due to coupling to other undesired resonant modes), resulting in an effective lowering of the resonator Q.
For applications where the low-loss inductive element or the external circuit, may exhibit variations, the matching circuit may need to be adjusted dynamically to match the inductive element to the external circuit impedance, Z0, at the desired frequency, f. Since there may typically be two tuning objectives, matching or controlling both the real and imaginary part of the impedance level, Z0, at the desired frequency, f, there may be two variable elements in the matching circuit. For inductive elements, the matching circuit may need to include at least one variable capacitive element.
A low-loss inductive element may be matched by topologies using two variable capacitors, or two networks of variable capacitors. A variable capacitor may, for example, be a tunable butterfly-type capacitor having, e.g., a center terminal for connection to a ground or other lead of a power source or load, and at least one other terminal across which a capacitance of the tunable butterfly-type capacitor can be varied or tuned, or any other capacitor having a user-configurable, variable capacitance.
A low-loss inductive element may be matched by topologies using one, or a network of, variable capacitor(s) and one, or a network of, variable inductor(s).
A low-loss inductive element may be matched by topologies using one, or a network of, variable capacitor(s) and one, or a network of, variable mutual inductance(s), which transformer-couple the inductive element either to an external circuit or to other systems.
In some cases, it may be difficult to find or implement tunable lumped elements with size, cost and performance specifications sufficient to realize high-Q, high-power, and potentially high-speed, tunable resonator designs. The topology of the circuit matching a variable inductive element to an external circuit may be designed so that some of the variability is assigned to the external circuit by varying the frequency, amplitude, phase, waveform, duty cycle, and the like, of the drive signals applied to transistors, diodes, switches and the like, in the external circuit.
The variations in resistance, R, and inductance, L, of an inductive element at the resonant frequency may be only partially compensated or not compensated at all. Adequate system performance may thus be preserved by tolerances designed into other system components or specifications. Partial adjustments, realized using fewer tunable components or less capable tunable components, may be sufficient.
Matching-circuit architectures may be designed that achieve the desired variability of the impedance matching circuit under high-power conditions, while minimizing the voltage/current rating requirements on its tunable elements and achieving a finer (i.e. more precise, with higher resolution) overall tunability. The topology of the circuit matching a variable inductive element to an impedance, Z0, may include appropriate combinations and placements of fixed and variable elements, so that the voltage/current requirements for the variable components may be reduced and the desired tuning range may be covered with finer tuning resolution. The voltage/current requirements may be reduced on components that are not variable.
The disclosed impedance matching architectures and techniques may be used to achieve the following:
To maximize the power delivered to, or to minimize impedance mismatches between, the source low-loss inductive elements (and any other systems wirelessly coupled to them) from the power driving generators.
To maximize the power delivered from, or to minimize impedance mismatches between, the device low-loss inductive elements (and any other systems wirelessly coupled to them) to the power driven loads.
To deliver a controlled amount of power to, or to achieve a certain impedance relationship between, the source low-loss inductive elements (and any other systems wirelessly coupled to them) from the power driving generators.
To deliver a controlled amount of power from, or to achieve a certain impedance relationship between, the device low-loss inductive elements (and any other systems wirelessly coupled to them) to the power driven loads.
Topologies for Preservation of Mode Profile (High-Q)
The resonator structure may be designed to be connected to the generator or the load wirelessly (indirectly) or with a hard-wired connection (directly).
Consider a general indirectly coupled matching topology such as that shown by the block diagram in FIG. 28A. There, an inductive element 2802, labeled as (R,L) and represented by the circuit symbol for an inductor, may be any of the inductive elements discussed in this disclosure or in the references provided herein, and where an impedance-matching circuit 2402 includes or consists of parts A and B. B may be the part of the matching circuit that connects the impedance 2804, Z0, to the rest of the circuit (the combination of A and the inductive element (A+(R,L)) via a wireless connection (an inductive or capacitive coupling mechanism).
The combination of A and the inductive element 2802 may form a resonator 102, which in isolation may support a high-Q resonator electromagnetic mode, with an associated current and charge distribution. The lack of a wired connection between the external circuit, Z0 and B, and the resonator, A+(R,L), may ensure that the high-Q resonator electromagnetic mode and its current/charge distributions may take the form of its intrinsic (in-isolation) profile, so long as the degree of wireless coupling is not too large. That is, the electromagnetic mode, current/charge distributions, and thus the high-Q of the resonator may be automatically maintained using an indirectly coupled matching topology.
This matching topology may be referred to as indirectly coupled, or transformer-coupled, or inductively-coupled, in the case where inductive coupling is used between the external circuit and the inductor loop. This type of coupling scenario was used to couple the power supply to the source resonator and the device resonator to the light bulb in the demonstration of wireless energy transfer over mid-range distances described in the referenced Science article.
Next consider examples in which the inductive element may include the inductive element and any indirectly coupled systems. In this case, as disclosed above, and again because of the lack of a wired connection between the external circuit or the coupled systems and the resonator, the coupled systems may not, with good approximation for not-too-large degree of indirect coupling, affect the resonator electromagnetic mode profile and the current/charge distributions of the resonator. Therefore, an indirectly-coupled matching circuit may work equally well for any general inductive element as part of a resonator as well as for inductive elements wirelessly-coupled to other systems, as defined herein. Throughout this disclosure, the matching topologies we disclose refer to matching topologies for a general inductive element of this type, that is, where any additional systems may be indirectly coupled to the low-loss inductive element, and it is to be understood that those additional systems do not greatly affect the resonator electromagnetic mode profile and the current/charge distributions of the resonator.
Based on the argument above, in a wireless power transmission system of any number of coupled source resonators, device resonators and intermediate resonators the wireless magnetic (inductive) coupling between resonators does not affect the electromagnetic mode profile and the current/charge distributions of each one of the resonators. Therefore, when these resonators have a high (unloaded and unperturbed) Q, their (unloaded and unperturbed) Q may be preserved in the presence of the wireless coupling. (Note that the loaded Q of a resonator may be reduced in the presence of wireless coupling to another resonator, but we may be interested in preserving the unloaded Q, which relates only to loss mechanisms and not to coupling/loading mechanisms.)
Consider a matching topology such as is shown in FIG. 28B. The capacitors shown in FIG. 28B may represent capacitor circuits or networks. The capacitors shown may be used to form the resonator 102 and to adjust the frequency and/or impedance of the source and device resonators. This resonator 102 may be directly coupled to an impedance, Z0, using the ports labeled “terminal connections” 2808. FIG. 28C shows a generalized directly coupled matching topology, where the impedance-matching circuit 2602 includes or consists of parts A, B and C. Here, circuit elements in A, B and C may be considered part of the resonator 102 as well as part of the impedance matching 2402 (and frequency tuning) topology. B and C may be the parts of the matching circuit 2402 that connect the impedance Z0 2804 (or the network terminals) to the rest of the circuit (A and the inductive element) via a single wire connection each. Note that B and C could be empty (short-circuits). If we disconnect or open circuit parts B and C (namely those single wire connections), then, the combination of A and the inductive element (R,L) may form the resonator.
The high-Q resonator electromagnetic mode may be such that the profile of the voltage distribution along the inductive element has nodes, namely positions where the voltage is zero. One node may be approximately at the center of the length of the inductive element, such as the center of the conductor used to form the inductive element, (with or without magnetic materials) and at least one other node may be within A. The voltage distribution may be approximately anti-symmetric along the inductive element with respect to its voltage node. A high Q may be maintained by designing the matching topology (A, B, C) and/or the terminal voltages (V1, V2) so that this high-Q resonator electromagnetic mode distribution may be approximately preserved on the inductive element. This high-Q resonator electromagnetic mode distribution may be approximately preserved on the inductive element by preserving the voltage node (approximately at the center) of the inductive element. Examples that achieve these design goals are provided herein.
A, B, and C may be arbitrary (namely not having any special symmetry), and V1 and V2 may be chosen so that the voltage across the inductive element is symmetric (voltage node at the center inductive). These results may be achieved using simple matching circuits but potentially complicated terminal voltages, because a topology-dependent common-mode signal (V1+V2)/2 may be required on both terminals.
Consider an ‘axis’ that connects all the voltage nodes of the resonator, where again one node is approximately at the center of the length of the inductive element and the others within A. (Note that the ‘axis’ is really a set of points (the voltage nodes) within the electric-circuit topology and may not necessarily correspond to a linear axis of the actual physical structure. The ‘axis’ may align with a physical axis in cases where the physical structure has symmetry.) Two points of the resonator are electrically symmetric with respect to the ‘axis’, if the impedances seen between each of the two points and a point on the ‘axis’, namely a voltage-node point of the resonator, are the same.
B and C may be the same (C=B), and the two terminals may be connected to any two points of the resonator (A+(R,L)) that are electrically symmetric with respect to the ‘axis’ defined above and driven with opposite voltages (V2=−V1) as shown in FIG. 28D. The two electrically symmetric points of the resonator 102 may be two electrically symmetric points on the inductor loop. The two electrically symmetric points of the resonator may be two electrically symmetric points inside A. If the two electrically symmetric points, (to which each of the equal parts B and C is connected), are inside A, A may need to be designed so that these electrically-symmetric points are accessible as connection points within the circuit. This topology may be referred to as a ‘balanced drive’ topology. These balanced-drive examples may have the advantage that any common-mode signal that may be present on the ground line, due to perturbations at the external circuitry or the power network, for example, may be automatically rejected (and may not reach the resonator). In some balanced-drive examples, this topology may require more components than other topologies.
In other examples, C may be chosen to be a short-circuit and the corresponding terminal to be connected to ground (V=0) and to any point on the electric-symmetry (zero-voltage) ‘axis’ of the resonator, and B to be connected to any other point of the resonator not on the electric-symmetry ‘axis’, as shown in FIG. 28E. The ground-connected point on the electric-symmetry ‘axis’ may be the voltage node on the inductive element, approximately at the center of its conductor length. The ground-connected point on the electric-symmetry ‘axis’ may be inside the circuit A. Where the ground-connected point on the electric-symmetry ‘axis’ is inside A, A may need to be designed to include one such point on the electrical-symmetric ‘axis’ that is electrically accessible, namely where connection is possible.
This topology may be referred to as an ‘unbalanced drive’ topology. The approximately anti-symmetric voltage distribution of the electromagnetic mode along the inductive element may be approximately preserved, even though the resonator may not be driven exactly symmetrically. The reason is that the high Q and the large associated R-vs.-Z0 mismatch necessitate that a small current may run through B and ground, compared to the much larger current that may flow inside the resonator, (A+(R,L)). In this scenario, the perturbation on the resonator mode may be weak and the location of the voltage node may stay at approximately the center location of the inductive element. These unbalanced-drive examples may have the advantage that they may be achieved using simple matching circuits and that there is no restriction on the driving voltage at the V1 terminal. In some unbalanced-drive examples, additional designs may be required to reduce common-mode signals that may appear at the ground terminal.
The directly-coupled impedance-matching circuit, generally including or consisting of parts A, B and C, as shown in FIG. 28C, may be designed so that the wires and components of the circuit do not perturb the electric and magnetic field profiles of the electromagnetic mode of the inductive element and/or the resonator and thus preserve the high resonator Q. The wires and metallic components of the circuit may be oriented to be perpendicular to the electric field lines of the electromagnetic mode. The wires and components of the circuit may be placed in regions where the electric and magnetic field of the electromagnetic mode are weak.
Topologies for Alleviating Low-Series-Loss and High-Current-Rating Requirements on Elements
If the matching circuit used to match a small resistance, R, of a low-loss inductive element to a larger characteristic impedance, Z0, of an external circuit may be considered lossless, then IZo2Zo=IR2R⇄IZoIR=√{square root over (R/Zo)} and the current flowing through the terminals is much smaller than the current flowing through the inductive element. Therefore, elements connected immediately in series with the terminals (such as in directly-coupled B, C (FIG. 28C)) may not carry high currents. Then, even if the matching circuit has lossy elements, the resistive loss present in the elements in series with the terminals may not result in a significant reduction in the high-Q of the resonator. That is, resistive loss in those series elements may not significantly reduce the efficiency of power transmission from Z0 to the inductive element or vice versa. Therefore, strict requirements for low-series-loss and/or high current-ratings may not be necessary for these components. In general, such reduced requirements may lead to a wider selection of components that may be designed into the high-Q and/or high-power impedance matching and resonator topologies. These reduced requirements may be especially helpful in expanding the variety of variable and/or high voltage and/or low-parallel-loss components that may be used in these high-Q and/or high-power impedance-matching circuits.
Topologies for Alleviating Low-Parallel-Loss and High-Voltage-Rating Requirements on Elements
If, as above, the matching circuit used to match a small resistance, R, of a low-loss inductive element to a larger characteristic impedance, Z0, of an external circuit is lossless, then using the previous analysis,

|VZo/Vload|=|IZoZo/IR(R+jX)|≈√{square root over (R/Zo)}·Zo/X=√{square root over (Zo/R)}/(X/R),

and, for a low-loss (high-X/R) inductive element, the voltage across the terminals may be typically much smaller than the voltage across the inductive element. Therefore, elements connected immediately in parallel to the terminals may not need to withstand high voltages. Then, even if the matching circuit has lossy elements, the resistive loss present in the elements in parallel with the terminals may not result in a significant reduction in the high-Q of the resonator. That is, resistive loss in those parallel elements may not significantly reduce the efficiency of power transmission from Z0 to the inductive element or vice versa. Therefore, strict requirements for low-parallel-loss and/or high voltage-ratings may not be necessary for these components. In general, such reduced requirements may lead to a wider selection of components that may be designed into the high-Q and/or high-power impedance matching and resonator topologies. These reduced requirements may be especially helpful in expanding the variety of variable and/or high current and/or low-series-loss components that may be used in these high-Q and/or high-power impedance-matching and resonator circuits.

Note that the design principles above may reduce currents and voltages on various elements differently, as they variously suggest the use of networks in series with Z0 (such as directly-coupled B, C) or the use of networks in parallel with Z0. The preferred topology for a given application may depend on the availability of low-series-loss/high-current-rating or low-parallel-loss/high-voltage-rating elements.
Combinations of Fixed and Variable Elements for Achieving Fine Tunability and Alleviating High-Rating Requirements on Variable Elements
Circuit Topologies
Variable circuit elements with satisfactory low-loss and high-voltage or current ratings may be difficult or expensive to obtain. In this disclosure, we describe impedance-matching topologies that may incorporate combinations of fixed and variable elements, such that large voltages or currents may be assigned to fixed elements in the circuit, which may be more likely to have adequate voltage and current ratings, and alleviating the voltage and current rating requirements on the variable elements in the circuit.
Variable circuit elements may have tuning ranges larger than those required by a given impedance-matching application and, in those cases, fine tuning resolution may be difficult to obtain using only such large-range elements. In this disclosure, we describe impedance-matching topologies that incorporate combinations of both fixed and variable elements, such that finer tuning resolution may be accomplished with the same variable elements.
Therefore, topologies using combinations of both fixed and variable elements may bring two kinds of advantages simultaneously: reduced voltage across, or current through, sensitive tuning components in the circuit and finer tuning resolution. Note that the maximum achievable tuning range may be related to the maximum reduction in voltage across, or current through, the tunable components in the circuit designs.
Element Topologies
A single variable circuit-element (as opposed to the network of elements discussed above) may be implemented by a topology using a combination of fixed and variable components, connected in series or in parallel, to achieve a reduction in the rating requirements of the variable components and a finer tuning resolution. This can be demonstrated mathematically by the fact that:

If x|total|=x|fixed|+x|variable|,

then Δx|total|/x|total|=Δx|variable|/(x|fixed|+x|variable|)

and Xvariable/Xtotal=Xvariable/(Xfixed+Xvariable)

where x|subscript| is any element value (e.g. capacitance, inductance), X is voltage or current, and the “+sign” denotes the appropriate (series-addition or parallel-addition) combination of elements. Note that the subscript format for x|subscript|, is chosen to easily distinguish it from the radius of the area enclosed by a circular inductive element (e.g. x, x1, etc.).

Furthermore, this principle may be used to implement a variable electric element of a certain type (e.g. a capacitance or inductance) by using a variable element of a different type, if the latter is combined appropriately with other fixed elements.
In conclusion, one may apply a topology optimization algorithm that decides on the required number, placement, type and values of fixed and variable elements with the required tunable range as an optimization constraint and the minimization of the currents and/or voltages on the variable elements as the optimization objective.
EXAMPLES
In the following schematics, we show different specific topology implementations for impedance matching to and resonator designs for a low-loss inductive element. In addition, we indicate for each topology: which of the principles described above are used, the equations giving the values of the variable elements that may be used to achieve the matching, and the range of the complex impedances that may be matched (using both inequalities and a Smith-chart description). For these examples, we assume that Z0 is real, but an extension to a characteristic impedance with a non-zero imaginary part is straightforward, as it implies only a small adjustment in the required values of the components of the matching network. We will use the convention that the subscript, n, on a quantity implies normalization to (division by) Z0.
FIG. 29A-FIG. 29C show two examples of a transformer-coupled impedance-matching circuit, where the two tunable elements are a capacitor and the mutual inductance between two inductive elements. If we define respectively X2=ωL2 for FIG. 29A and X2=ωL2-1/ωC2 for FIG. 29B, and X≡ωL, then the required values of the tunable elements are:



  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      1
      
        X
        +
        
          RX
          
            2
            ⁢
            n
          
        
      
    
  




  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      M
    
    =
    
      
        
          
            Z
            o
          
          ⁢
          
            R
            ⁡
            
              (
              
                1
                +
                
                  X
                  
                    2
                    ⁢
                    n
                  
                  2
                
              
              )
            
          
        
      
      .
    
  



For the topology of FIG. 29B, an especially straightforward design may be to choose X2=0. In that case, these topologies may match the impedances satisfying the inequalities:

Rn>0, Xn>0,

which are shown by the area enclosed by the bold lines on the Smith chart of FIG. 29C.

Given a well pre-chosen fixed M, one can also use the above matching topologies with a tunable C2 instead.
FIG. 30A-FIG. 30F show six examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are capacitors, and FIG. 30H-FIG. 30M show six examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are one capacitor and one inductor. For the topologies of FIG. 30A-FIG. 30C and FIG. 30H-FIG. 30J, a common-mode signal may be required at the two terminals to preserve the voltage node of the resonator at the center of the inductive element and thus the high Q. Note that these examples may be described as implementations of the general topology shown in FIG. 28C. For the symmetric topologies of FIG. 30D-FIG. 30F and FIG. 30K-FIG. 30M, the two terminals may need to be driven anti-symmetrically (balanced drive) to preserve the voltage node of the resonator at the center of the inductive element and thus the high Q. Note that these examples may be described as implementations of the general topology shown in FIG. 28D. It will be appreciated that a network of capacitors, as used herein, may in general refer to any circuit topology including one or more capacitors, including without limitation any of the circuits specifically disclosed herein using capacitors, or any other equivalent or different circuit structure(s), unless another meaning is explicitly provided or otherwise clear from the context.
Let us define respectively Z=R+jωL for FIG. 30A, FIG. 30D, FIG. 30H and FIG. 30K, Z=R+jωL+1/jωC3 for FIG. 30B, FIG. 30E, FIG. 30I and FIG. 30L, and Z=(R+jωL)∥(1/jωC3) for FIG. 30C, FIG. 30F, FIG. 30J and FIG. 30M, where the symbol “∥” means “the parallel combination of”, and then R≡Re{Z}, X≡Im{Z}. Then, for FIG. 30A-FIG. 30F the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:




  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      
        X
        -
        
          
            
              
                X
                2
              
              ⁢
              
                R
                n
              
            
            -
            
              
                R
                2
              
              ⁡
              
                (
                
                  1
                  -
                  
                    R
                    n
                  
                
                )
              
            
          
        
      
      
        
          X
          2
        
        +
        
          R
          2
        
      
    
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        2
      
    
    =
    
      
        
          R
          n
        
        ⁢
        ω
        ⁢
        
          
        
        ⁢
        
          C
          1
        
      
      
        1
        -
        
          X
          ⁢
          
            
          
          ⁢
          ω
          ⁢
          
            
          
          ⁢
          
            C
            1
          
        
        -
        
          R
          n
        
      
    
  
  ,




and these topologies can match the impedances satisfying the inequalities:

Rn≦1, Xn≧√{square root over (Rn(1−Rn))}

which are shown by the area enclosed by the bold lines on the Smith chart of FIG. 30G. For FIG. 30H-FIG. 30M the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:





  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      
        X
        +
        
          
            
              
                X
                2
              
              ⁢
              
                R
                n
              
            
            -
            
              
                R
                2
              
              ⁡
              
                (
                
                  1
                  -
                  
                    R
                    n
                  
                
                )
              
            
          
        
      
      
        
          X
          2
        
        +
        
          R
          2
        
      
    
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        L
        2
      
    
    =
    
      -
      
        
          
            1
            -
            
              X
              ⁢
              
                
              
              ⁢
              ω
              ⁢
              
                
              
              ⁢
              
                C
                1
              
            
            -
            
              R
              n
            
          
          
            
              R
              n
            
            ⁢
            ω
            ⁢
            
              
            
            ⁢
            
              C
              1
            
          
        
        .
      
    
  




FIG. 31A-FIG. 31C shows three examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are capacitors, and FIG. 31E-FIG. 31G show three examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are one capacitor and one inductor. For the topologies of FIG. 31A, FIG. 31B, FIG. 31C, FIG. 31E, FIG. 31F and FIG. 31G, the ground terminal is connected between two equal-value capacitors, 2C1, (namely on the axis of symmetry of the main resonator) to preserve the voltage node of the resonator at the center of the inductive element and thus the high Q. Note that these examples may be described as implementations of the general topology shown in FIG. 28E.
Let us define respectively Z=R+jωL for FIG. 31A and FIG. 31E, Z=R+jωL+1/jωC3 for FIG. 31B and FIG. 31F, and Z=(R+jωL)∥(1/jωC3) for FIG. 31C and FIG. 31G, and then R≡Re{Z}, X≡Im{Z}. Then, for FIG. 31A-FIG. 31C the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:




  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      
        X
        -
        
          
            1
            2
          
          ⁢
          
            
              
                
                  X
                  2
                
                ⁢
                
                  R
                  n
                
              
              -
              
                
                  R
                  2
                
                ⁡
                
                  (
                  
                    4
                    -
                    
                      R
                      n
                    
                  
                  )
                
              
            
          
        
      
      
        
          X
          2
        
        +
        
          R
          2
        
      
    
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        2
      
    
    =
    
      
        
          R
          n
        
        ⁢
        ω
        ⁢
        
          
        
        ⁢
        
          C
          1
        
      
      
        1
        -
        
          X
          ⁢
          
            
          
          ⁢
          ω
          ⁢
          
            
          
          ⁢
          
            C
            1
          
        
        -
        
          
            R
            n
          
          2
        
      
    
  
  ,




and these topologies can match the impedances satisfying the inequalities:




  
    
      R
      n
    
    ≤
    1
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      X
      n
    
    ≥
    
      
        
          
            R
            n
          
          
            1
            -
            
              R
              n
            
          
        
      
      ⁢
      
        (
        
          2
          -
          
            R
            n
          
        
        )
      
    
  




which are shown by the area enclosed by the bold lines on the Smith chart of FIG. 31D. For FIG. 31E-FIG. 31G the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:




  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      
        X
        +
        
          
            1
            2
          
          ⁢
          
            
              
                
                  X
                  2
                
                ⁢
                
                  R
                  n
                
              
              -
              
                
                  R
                  2
                
                ⁡
                
                  (
                  
                    4
                    -
                    
                      R
                      n
                    
                  
                  )
                
              
            
          
        
      
      
        
          X
          2
        
        +
        
          R
          2
        
      
    
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        L
        2
      
    
    =
    
      -
      
        
          
            1
            -
            
              X
              ⁢
              
                
              
              ⁢
              ω
              ⁢
              
                
              
              ⁢
              
                C
                1
              
            
            -
            
              
                R
                n
              
              2
            
          
          
            
              R
              n
            
            ⁢
            ω
            ⁢
            
              
            
            ⁢
            
              C
              1
            
          
        
        .
      
    
  




FIG. 32A-FIG. 32C show three examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are capacitors, and FIG. 32E-FIG. 32G show three examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are one capacitor and one inductor. For the topologies of FIG. 32A, FIG. 32B, FIG. 32C, FIG. 32E, FIG. 32F and FIG. 32G, the ground terminal may be connected at the center of the inductive element to preserve the voltage node of the resonator at that point and thus the high Q. Note that these example may be described as implementations of the general topology shown in FIG. 28E.
Let us define respectively Z=R+jωL for FIG. 32A, Z=R+jωL+1/jωC3 for FIG. 32B, and Z=(R+jωL)∥(1/jωC3) for FIG. 32C, and then R≡Re{Z}, X≡Im{Z}. Then, for FIG. 32A-FIG. 32C the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:




  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      
        X
        -
        
          
            
              
                
                  X
                  2
                
                ⁢
                
                  R
                  n
                
              
              -
              
                2
                ⁢
                
                  
                    R
                    2
                  
                  ⁡
                  
                    (
                    
                      2
                      -
                      
                        R
                        n
                      
                    
                    )
                  
                
              
            
            
              4
              -
              
                R
                n
              
            
          
        
      
      
        
          X
          2
        
        +
        
          R
          2
        
      
    
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        2
      
    
    =
    
      
        
          R
          n
        
        ⁢
        ω
        ⁢
        
          
        
        ⁢
        
          C
          1
        
      
      
        1
        -
        
          X
          ⁢
          
            
          
          ⁢
          ω
          ⁢
          
            
          
          ⁢
          
            C
            1
          
        
        -
        
          
            R
            n
          
          2
        
        +
        
          
            
              R
              n
            
            ⁢
            X
            ⁢
            
              
            
            ⁢
            ω
            ⁢
            
              
            
            ⁢
            
              C
              1
            
          
          
            2
            ⁢
            
              (
              
                1
                +
                k
              
              )
            
          
        
      
    
  
  ,




where k is defined by M′=−kL′, where L′ is the inductance of each half of the inductor loop and M′ is the mutual inductance between the two halves, and these topologies can match the impedances satisfying the inequalities:

Rn≦2, Xn≧√{square root over (2Rn(2−Rn))}

which are shown by the area enclosed by the bold lines on the Smith chart of FIG. 32D. For FIG. 32E-FIG. 32G the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:





  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      
        X
        +
        
          
            
              
                
                  X
                  2
                
                ⁢
                
                  R
                  n
                
              
              -
              
                2
                ⁢
                
                  
                    R
                    2
                  
                  ⁡
                  
                    (
                    
                      2
                      -
                      
                        R
                        n
                      
                    
                    )
                  
                
              
            
            
              4
              -
              
                R
                n
              
            
          
        
      
      
        
          X
          2
        
        +
        
          R
          2
        
      
    
  
  ,




In the circuits of FIG. 30A-FIG. 30M, FIG. 31A-FIG. 31G and FIG. 32A-FIG. 32G, the capacitor, C2, or the inductor, L2, is (or the two capacitors, 2C2, or the two inductors, L2/2, are) in series with the terminals and may not need to have very low series-loss or withstand a large current.
FIG. 33A-FIG. 33F show six examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are capacitors, and FIG. 33H-FIG. 33M show six examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are one capacitor and one inductor. For the topologies of FIG. 33A, FIG. 33B, FIG. 33C, FIG. 33H, FIG. 33I and FIG. 33J, a common-mode signal may be required at the two terminals to preserve the voltage node of the resonator at the center of the inductive element and thus the high Q. Note that these examples may be described as implementations of the general topology shown in FIG. 28C, where B and C are short-circuits and A is not balanced. For the symmetric topologies of FIG. 33D, FIG. 33E, FIG. 33F, FIG. 33K, FIG. 33L and FIG. 33M, the two terminals may need to be driven anti-symmetrically (balanced drive) to preserve the voltage node of the resonator at the center of the inductive element and thus the high Q. Note that these examples may be described as implementations of the general topology shown in FIG. 28D, where B and C are short-circuits and A is balanced.
Let us define respectively Z=R+jωL for FIG. 33A, FIG. 33D, FIG. 33H and FIG. 33K, Z=R+jωL+1/jωC3 for FIG. 33B, FIG. 33E, FIG. 33I and FIG. 33L, and Z=(R+jωL)∥(1/jωC3) for FIG. 33C, FIG. 33F, FIG. 33J and FIG. 33M, and then R≡Re{Z}, X≡Im{Z}. Then, for FIG. 33A-FIG. 33F the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:




  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      1
      
        X
        -
        
          
            Z
            o
          
          ⁢
          
            
              
                R
                n
              
              ⁡
              
                (
                
                  1
                  -
                  
                    R
                    n
                  
                
                )
              
            
          
        
      
    
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        2
      
    
    =
    
      
        1
        
          Z
          o
        
      
      ⁢
      
        
          
            1
            
              R
              n
            
          
          -
          1
        
      
    
  
  ,




and these topologies can match the impedances satisfying the inequalities:

Rn≦1, Xn≧√{square root over (Rn(1−Rn))}

which are shown by the area enclosed by the bold lines on the Smith chart of FIG. 33G. For FIG. 35H-FIG. 35M the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:





  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      1
      
        X
        +
        
          
            Z
            o
          
          ⁢
          
            
              
                R
                n
              
              ⁡
              
                (
                
                  1
                  -
                  
                    R
                    n
                  
                
                )
              
            
          
        
      
    
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        L
        2
      
    
    =
    
      
        
          Z
          o
        
        
          
            
              1
              
                R
                n
              
            
            -
            1
          
        
      
      .
    
  




FIG. 34A-FIG. 34C show three examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are capacitors, and FIG. 34E-FIG. 34G show three examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are one capacitor and one inductor. For the topologies of FIG. 34A, FIG. 34B, FIG. 34C, FIG. 34E, FIG. 34F and FIG. 34G, the ground terminal is connected between two equal-value capacitors, 2C2, (namely on the axis of symmetry of the main resonator) to preserve the voltage node of the resonator at the center of the inductive element and thus the high Q. Note that these examples may be described as implementations of the general topology shown in FIG. 28E.
Let us define respectively Z=R+jωL for FIG. 34A and FIG. 34E, Z=R+jωL+1/jωC3 for FIG. 34B and FIG. 34F, and Z=(R+jωL)∥(1/jωC3) for FIG. 34C and FIG. 34G, and then R≡Re{Z}, X≡Im{Z}. Then, for FIG. 34A-FIG. 34C the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:




  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      1
      
        X
        -
        
          
            Z
            o
          
          ⁢
          
            
              
                1
                -
                
                  R
                  n
                
              
              
                R
                n
              
            
          
          ⁢
          
            (
            
              2
              -
              
                R
                n
              
            
            )
          
        
      
    
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        2
      
    
    =
    
      
        1
        
          2
          ⁢
          
            Z
            o
          
        
      
      ⁢
      
        
          
            1
            
              R
              n
            
          
          -
          1
        
      
    
  
  ,




and these topologies can match the impedances satisfying the inequalities:





  
    
      R
      n
    
    ≤
    1
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      X
      n
    
    ≥
    
      
        
          
            R
            n
          
          
            1
            -
            
              R
              n
            
          
        
      
      ⁢
      
        (
        
          2
          -
          
            R
            n
          
        
        )
      
    
  




which are shown by the area enclosed by the bold lines on the Smith chart of FIG. 34D. For FIG. 34E-FIG. 34G the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:





  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      1
      
        X
        +
        
          
            Z
            o
          
          ⁢
          
            
              
                1
                -
                
                  R
                  n
                
              
              
                R
                n
              
            
          
          ⁢
          
            (
            
              2
              -
              
                R
                n
              
            
            )
          
        
      
    
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        L
        2
      
    
    =
    
      
        
          2
          ⁢
          
            Z
            o
          
        
        
          
            
              1
              
                R
                n
              
            
            -
            1
          
        
      
      .
    
  




FIG. 35A-FIG. 35C show three examples of directly-coupled impedance-matching circuits, where the two tunable elements are capacitors. For the topologies of FIG. 35A-FIG. 35C, the ground terminal may be connected at the center of the inductive element to preserve the voltage node of the resonator at that point and thus the high Q. Note that these examples may be described as implementations of the general topology shown in FIG. 28E.
Let us define respectively Z=R+jωL for FIG. 35A, Z=R+jωL+1/jωC3 for FIG. 35B, and Z=(R+jωL)∥(1/jωC3) for FIG. 35C, and then R≡Re{Z}, X≡Im{Z}. Then, the required values of the tunable elements may be given by:




  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        1
      
    
    =
    
      2
      
        
          X
          ⁡
          
            (
            
              1
              +
              a
            
            )
          
        
        -
        
          
            
              Z
              o
            
            ⁢
            
              R
              ⁡
              
                (
                
                  4
                  -
                  
                    R
                    n
                  
                
                )
              
            
            ⁢
            
              (
              
                1
                +
                
                  a
                  2
                
              
              )
            
          
        
      
    
  
  ,
  
    

  
  ⁢
  
    
      ω
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        C
        2
      
    
    =
    
      2
      
        
          X
          ⁡
          
            (
            
              1
              +
              a
            
            )
          
        
        +
        
          
            
              Z
              o
            
            ⁢
            
              R
              ⁡
              
                (
                
                  4
                  -
                  
                    R
                    n
                  
                
                )
              
            
            ⁢
            
              (
              
                1
                +
                
                  a
                  2
                
              
              )
            
          
        
      
    
  
  ,




where





  a
  =
  
    
      R
      
        
          2
          ⁢
          
            Z
            o
          
        
        -
        R
      
    
    ·
    
      k
      
        1
        +
        k
      
    
  




and k is defined by M′=kL′, where L′ is the inductance of each half of the inductive element and M′ is the mutual inductance between the two halves. These topologies can match the impedances satisfying the inequalities:




  
    
      
        
          
            
              R
              n
            
            ≤
            2
          
          &
        
        ⁢
        
          2
          γ
        
      
      ≤
      
        R
        n
      
      ≤
      4
    
    ,
    
      

    
    ⁢
    
      
        X
        n
      
      ≥
      
        
          
            
              
                R
                n
              
              ⁡
              
                (
                
                  4
                  -
                  
                    R
                    n
                  
                
                )
              
            
            ⁢
            
              (
              
                2
                -
                
                  R
                  n
                
              
              )
            
          
          
            2
            -
            
              γ
              ⁢
              
                
              
              ⁢
              
                R
                n
              
            
          
        
      
    
    ,
    
      

    
    ⁢
    where
  




  
    γ
    =
    
      
        
          1
          -
          
            6
            ⁢
            k
          
          +
          
            k
            2
          
        
        
          1
          +
          
            2
            ⁢
            k
          
          +
          
            k
            2
          
        
      
      ≤
      1
    
  



which are shown by the area enclosed by the bold lines on the three Smith charts shown in FIG. 35D for k=0, FIG. 35E for k=0.05, and FIG. 35F for k=1. Note that for 0<k<1 there are two disconnected regions of the Smith chart that this topology can match.

In the circuits of FIG. 33A-FIG. 33M, FIG. 34A-FIG. 34G and FIG. 35A-FIG. 35F, the capacitor, C2, or the inductor, L2, is (or one of the two capacitors, 2C2, or one of the two inductors, 2L2, are) in parallel with the terminals and thus may not need to have a high voltage-rating. In the case of two capacitors, 2C2, or two inductors, 2L2, both may not need to have a high voltage-rating, since approximately the same current flows through them and thus they experience approximately the same voltage across them.
For the topologies of FIG. 30A-FIG. 30M, FIG. 31A-FIG. 31G, FIG. 32A-FIG. 32G, FIG. 33A-FIG. 33M, FIG. 34A-FIG. 34G and FIG. 35A-FIG. 35F, where a capacitor, C3, is used, the use of the capacitor, C3, may lead to finer tuning of the frequency and the impedance. For the topologies of FIG. 30A-FIG. 30M, FIG. 31A-FIG. 31G, FIG. 32A-FIG. 32G, FIG. 33A-FIG. 33M, FIG. 34A-FIG. 34G and FIG. 35A-FIG. 35F, the use of the fixed capacitor, C3, in series with the inductive element may ensure that a large percentage of the high inductive-element voltage will be across this fixed capacitor, C3, thus potentially alleviating the voltage rating requirements for the other elements of the impedance matching circuit, some of which may be variable. Whether or not such topologies are preferred depends on the availability, cost and specifications of appropriate fixed and tunable components.
In all the above examples, a pair of equal-value variable capacitors without a common terminal may be implemented using ganged-type capacitors or groups or arrays of varactors or diodes biased and controlled to tune their values as an ensemble. A pair of equal-value variable capacitors with one common terminal can be implemented using a tunable butterfly-type capacitor or any other tunable or variable capacitor or group or array of varactors or diodes biased and controlled to tune their capacitance values as an ensemble.
Another criterion which may be considered upon the choice of the impedance matching network is the response of the network to different frequencies than the desired operating frequency. The signals generated in the external circuit, to which the inductive element is coupled, may not be monochromatic at the desired frequency but periodic with the desired frequency, as for example the driving signal of a switching amplifier or the reflected signal of a switching rectifier. In some such cases, it may be desirable to suppress the amount of higher-order harmonics that enter the inductive element (for example, to reduce radiation of these harmonics from this element). Then the choice of impedance matching network may be one that sufficiently suppresses the amount of such harmonics that enters the inductive element.
The impedance matching network may be such that the impedance seen by the external circuit at frequencies higher than the fundamental harmonic is high, when the external periodic signal is a signal that can be considered to behave as a voltage-source signal (such as the driving signal of a class-D amplifier with a series resonant load), so that little current flows through the inductive element at higher frequencies. Among the topologies of FIG. 30A-FIG. 30M, FIG. 31A-FIG. 31G, FIG. 32A-FIG. 32G, FIG. 33A-FIG. 33M, FIG. 34A-FIG. 34G and FIG. 35A-FIG. 35F, those which use an inductor, L2, may then be preferable, as this inductor presents a high impedance at high frequencies.
The impedance matching network may be such that the impedance seen by the external circuit at frequencies higher than the fundamental harmonic is low, when the external periodic signal is a signal that can be considered to behave as a current-source signal, so that little voltage is induced across the inductive element at higher frequencies. Among the topologies of FIG. 30A-FIG. 30M, FIG. 31A-FIG. 31G, FIG. 32A-FIG. 32G, FIG. 33A-FIG. 33M, FIG. 34A-FIG. 34G and FIG. 35A-FIG. 35F, those which use a capacitor, C2, are then preferable, as this capacitor presents a low impedance at high frequencies.
FIG. 36A-FIG. 36D show four examples of a variable capacitance, using networks of one variable capacitor and the rest fixed capacitors. Using these network topologies, fine tunability of the total capacitance value may be achieved. Furthermore, the topologies of FIG. 36A, FIG. 36C and FIG. 36D, may be used to reduce the voltage across the variable capacitor, since most of the voltage may be assigned across the fixed capacitors.
FIG. 37A and FIG. 37B show two examples of a variable capacitance, using networks of one variable inductor and fixed capacitors. In particular, these networks may provide implementations for a variable reactance, and, at the frequency of interest, values for the variable inductor may be used such that each network corresponds to a net negative variable reactance, which may be effectively a variable capacitance.
Tunable elements such as tunable capacitors and tunable inductors may be mechanically-tunable, electrically-tunable, thermally-tunable and the like. The tunable elements may be variable capacitors or inductors, varactors, diodes, Schottky diodes, reverse-biased PN diodes, varactor arrays, diode arrays, Schottky diode arrays and the like. The diodes may be Si diodes, GaN diodes, SiC diodes, and the like. GaN and SiC diodes may be particularly attractive for high power applications. The tunable elements may be electrically switched capacitor banks, electrically-switched mechanically-tunable capacitor banks, electrically-switched varactor-array banks, electrically-switched transformer-coupled inductor banks, and the like. The tunable elements may be combinations of the elements listed above.
As described above, the efficiency of the power transmission between coupled high-Q magnetic resonators may be impacted by how closely matched the resonators are in resonant frequency and how well their impedances are matched to the power supplies and power consumers in the system. Because a variety of external factors including the relative position of extraneous objects or other resonators in the system, or the changing of those relative positions, may alter the resonant frequency and/or input impedance of a high-Q magnetic resonator, tunable impedance networks may be required to maintain sufficient levels of power transmission in various environments or operating scenarios.
The capacitance values of the capacitors shown may be adjusted to adjust the resonant frequency and/or the impedance of the magnetic resonator. The capacitors may be adjusted electrically, mechanically, thermally, or by any other known methods. They may be adjusted manually or automatically, such as in response to a feedback signal. They may be adjusted to achieve certain power transmission efficiencies or other operating characteristics between the power supply and the power consumer.
The inductance values of the inductors and inductive elements in the resonator may be adjusted to adjust the frequency and/or impedance of the magnetic resonator. The inductance may be adjusted using coupled circuits that include adjustable components such as tunable capacitors, inductors and switches. The inductance may be adjusted using transformer coupled tuning circuits. The inductance may be adjusted by switching in and out different sections of conductor in the inductive elements and/or using ferro-magnetic tuning and/or mu-tuning, and the like.
The resonant frequency of the resonators may be adjusted to or may be allowed to change to lower or higher frequencies. The input impedance of the resonator may be adjusted to or may be allowed to change to lower or higher impedance values. The amount of power delivered by the source and/or received by the devices may be adjusted to or may be allowed to change to lower or higher levels of power. The amount of power delivered to the source and/or received by the devices from the device resonator may be adjusted to or may be allowed to change to lower or higher levels of power. The resonator input impedances, resonant frequencies, and power levels may be adjusted depending on the power consumer or consumers in the system and depending on the objects or materials in the vicinity of the resonators. The resonator input impedances, frequencies, and power levels may be adjusted manually or automatically, and may be adjusted in response to feedback or control signals or algorithms.
Circuit elements may be connected directly to the resonator, that is, by physical electrical contact, for example to the ends of the conductor that forms the inductive element and/or the terminal connectors. The circuit elements may be soldered to, welded to, crimped to, glued to, pinched to, or closely position to the conductor or attached using a variety of electrical components, connectors or connection techniques. The power supplies and the power consumers may be connected to magnetic resonators directly or indirectly or inductively. Electrical signals may be supplied to, or taken from, the resonators through the terminal connections.
It is to be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that in real implementations of the principles described herein, there may be an associated tolerance, or acceptable variation, to the values of real components (capacitors, inductors, resistors and the like) from the values calculated via the herein stated equations, to the values of real signals (voltages, currents and the like) from the values suggested by symmetry or anti-symmetry or otherwise, and to the values of real geometric locations of points (such as the point of connection of the ground terminal close to the center of the inductive element or the ‘axis’ points and the like) from the locations suggested by symmetry or otherwise.
EXAMPLES
System Block Diagrams
We disclose examples of high-Q resonators for wireless power transmission systems that may wirelessly power or charge devices at mid-range distances. High-Q resonator wireless power transmission systems also may wirelessly power or charge devices with magnetic resonators that are different in size, shape, composition, arrangement, and the like, from any source resonators in the system.
FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B show high level diagrams of two exemplary two-resonator systems. These exemplary systems each have a single source resonator 102S or 104S and a single device resonator 102D or 104D. FIG. 38 shows a high level block diagram of a system with a few more features highlighted. The wirelessly powered or charged device 2310 may include or consist of a device resonator 102D, device power and control circuitry 2304, and the like, along with the device 2308 or devices, to which either DC or AC or both AC and DC power is transferred. The energy or power source for a system may include the source power and control circuitry 2302, a source resonator 102S, and the like. The device 2308 or devices that receive power from the device resonator 102D and power and control circuitry 2304 may be any kind of device 2308 or devices as described previously. The device resonator 102D and circuitry 2304 delivers power to the device/devices 2308 that may be used to recharge the battery of the device/devices, power the device/devices directly, or both when in the vicinity of the source resonator 102S.
The source and device resonators may be separated by many meters or they may be very close to each other or they may be separated by any distance in between. The source and device resonators may be offset from each other laterally or axially. The source and device resonators may be directly aligned (no lateral offset), or they may be offset by meters, or anything in between. The source and device resonators may be oriented so that the surface areas enclosed by their inductive elements are approximately parallel to each other. The source and device resonators may be oriented so that the surface areas enclosed by their inductive elements are approximately perpendicular to each other, or they may be oriented for any relative angle (0 to 360 degrees) between them.
The source and device resonators may be free standing or they may be enclosed in an enclosure, container, sleeve or housing. These various enclosures may be composed of almost any kind of material. Low loss tangent materials such as Teflon, REXOLITE, styrene, and the like may be preferable for some applications. The source and device resonators may be integrated in the power supplies and power consumers. For example, the source and device resonators may be integrated into keyboards, computer mice, displays, cell phones, etc. so that they are not visible outside these devices. The source and device resonators may be separate from the power supplies and power consumers in the system and may be connected by a standard or custom wires, cables, connectors or plugs.
The source 102S may be powered from a number of DC or AC voltage, current or power sources including a USB port of a computer. The source 102S may be powered from the electric grid, from a wall plug, from a battery, from a power supply, from an engine, from a solar cell, from a generator, from another source resonator, and the like. The source power and control circuitry 2302 may include circuits and components to isolate the source electronics from the power source, so that any reflected power or signals are not coupled out through the source input terminals. The source power and control circuits 2302 may include power factor correction circuits and may be configured to monitor power usage for monitoring accounting, billing, control, and like functionalities.
The system may be operated bi-directionally. That is, energy or power that is generated or stored in a device resonator may be fed back to a power source including the electric grid, a battery, any kind of energy storage unit, and the like. The source power and control circuits may include power factor correction circuits and may be configured to monitor power usage for monitoring accounting, billing, control, and like functionalities for bi-directional energy flow. Wireless energy transfer systems may enable or promote vehicle-to-grid (V2G) applications.
The source and the device may have tuning capabilities that allow adjustment of operating points to compensate for changing environmental conditions, perturbations, and loading conditions that can affect the operation of the source and device resonators and the efficiency of the energy exchange. The tuning capability may also be used to multiplex power delivery to multiple devices, from multiple sources, to multiple systems, to multiple repeaters or relays, and the like. The tuning capability may be manually controlled, or automatically controlled and may be performed continuously, periodically, intermittently or at scheduled times or intervals.
The device resonator and the device power and control circuitry may be integrated into any portion of the device, such as a battery compartment, or a device cover or sleeve, or on a mother board, for example, and may be integrated alongside standard rechargeable batteries or other energy storage units. The device resonator may include a device field reshaper which may shield any combination of the device resonator elements and the device power and control electronics from the electromagnetic fields used for the power transfer and which may deflect the resonator fields away from the lossy device resonator elements as well as the device power and control electronics. A magnetic material and/or high-conductivity field reshaper may be used to increase the perturbed quality factor Q of the resonator and increase the perturbed coupling factor of the source and device resonators.
The source resonator and the source power and control circuitry may be integrated into any type of furniture, structure, mat, rug, picture frame (including digital picture frames, electronic frames), plug-in modules, electronic devices, vehicles, and the like. The source resonator may include a source field reshaper which may shield any combination of the source resonator elements and the source power and control electronics from the electromagnetic fields used for the power transfer and which may deflect the resonator fields away from the lossy source resonator elements as well as the source power and control electronics. A magnetic material and/or high-conductivity field reshaper may be used to increase the perturbed quality factor Q of the resonator and increase the perturbed coupling factor of the source and device resonators.
A block diagram of the subsystems in an example of a wirelessly powered device is shown in FIG. 39. The power and control circuitry may be designed to transform the alternating current power from the device resonator 102D and convert it to stable direct current power suitable for powering or charging a device. The power and control circuitry may be designed to transform an alternating current power at one frequency from the device resonator to alternating current power at a different frequency suitable for powering or charging a device. The power and control circuitry may include or consist of impedance matching circuitry 2402D, rectification circuitry 2404, voltage limiting circuitry (not shown), current limiting circuitry (not shown), AC-to-DC converter 2408 circuitry, DC-to-DC converter 2408 circuitry, DC-to-AC converter 2408 circuitry, AC-to-AC converter 2408 circuitry, battery charge control circuitry (not shown), and the like.
The impedance-matching 2402D network may be designed to maximize the power delivered between the device resonator 102D and the device power and control circuitry 2304 at the desired frequency. The impedance matching elements may be chosen and connected such that the high-Q of the resonators is preserved. Depending on the operating conditions, the impedance matching circuitry 2402D may be varied or tuned to control the power delivered from the source to the device, from the source to the device resonator, between the device resonator and the device power and control circuitry, and the like. The power, current and voltage signals may be monitored at any point in the device circuitry and feedback algorithms circuits, and techniques, may be used to control components to achieve desired signal levels and system operation. The feedback algorithms may be implemented using analog or digital circuit techniques and the circuits may include a microprocessor, a digital signal processor, a field programmable gate array processor and the like.
The third block of FIG. 39 shows a rectifier circuit 2404 that may rectify the AC voltage power from the device resonator into a DC voltage. In this configuration, the output of the rectifier 2404 may be the input to a voltage clamp circuit. The voltage clamp circuit (not shown) may limit the maximum voltage at the input to the DC-to-DC converter 2408D or DC-to-AC converter 2408D. In general, it may be desirable to use a DC-to-DC/AC converter with a large input voltage dynamic range so that large variations in device position and operation may be tolerated while adequate power is delivered to the device. For example, the voltage level at the output of the rectifier may fluctuate and reach high levels as the power input and load characteristics of the device change. As the device performs different tasks it may have varying power demands. The changing power demands can cause high voltages at the output of the rectifier as the load characteristics change. Likewise as the device and the device resonator are brought closer and further away from the source, the power delivered to the device resonator may vary and cause changes in the voltage levels at the output of the rectifier. A voltage clamp circuit may prevent the voltage output from the rectifier circuit from exceeding a predetermined value which is within the operating range of the DC-to-DC/AC converter. The voltage clamp circuitry may be used to extend the operating modes and ranges of a wireless energy transfer system.
The next block of the power and control circuitry of the device is the DC-to-DC converter 2408D that may produce a stable DC output voltage. The DC-to-DC converter may be a boost converter, buck converter, boost-buck converter, single ended primary inductance converter (SEPIC), or any other DC-DC topology that fits the requirements of the particular application. If the device requires AC power, a DC-to-AC converter may be substituted for the DC-to-DC converter, or the DC-to-DC converter may be followed by a DC-to-AC converter. If the device contains a rechargeable battery, the final block of the device power and control circuitry may be a battery charge control unit which may manage the charging and maintenance of the battery in battery powered devices.
The device power and control circuitry 2304 may contain a processor 2410D, such as a microcontroller, a digital signal processor, a field programmable gate array processor, a microprocessor, or any other type of processor. The processor may be used to read or detect the state or the operating point of the power and control circuitry and the device resonator. The processor may implement algorithms to interpret and adjust the operating point of the circuits, elements, components, subsystems and resonator. The processor may be used to adjust the impedance matching, the resonator, the DC to DC converters, the DC to AC converters, the battery charging unit, the rectifier, and the like of the wirelessly powered device.
The processor may have wireless or wired data communication links to other devices or sources and may transmit or receive data that can be used to adjust the operating point of the system. Any combination of power, voltage, and current signals at a single, or over a range of frequencies, may be monitored at any point in the device circuitry. These signals may be monitored using analog or digital or combined analog and digital techniques. These monitored signals may be used in feedback loops or may be reported to the user in a variety of known ways or they may be stored and retrieved at later times. These signals may be used to alert a user of system failures, to indicate performance, or to provide audio, visual, vibrational, and the like, feedback to a user of the system.
FIG. 40 shows components of source power and control circuitry 2302 of an exemplary wireless power transfer system configured to supply power to a single or multiple devices. The source power and control circuitry 2302 of the exemplary system may be powered from an AC voltage source 2502 such as a home electrical outlet, a DC voltage source such as a battery, a USB port of a computer, a solar cell, another wireless power source, and the like. The source power and control circuitry 2302 may drive the source resonator 102S with alternating current, such as with a frequency greater than 10 kHz and less than 100 MHz. The source power and control circuitry 2302 may drive the source resonator 102S with alternating current of frequency less than less than 10 GHz. The source power and control circuitry 2302 may include a DC-to-DC converter 2408S, an AC-to-DC converter 2408S, or both an AC-to-DC converter 2408S and a DC-to-DC 2408S converter, an oscillator 2508, a power amplifier 2504, an impedance matching network 2402S, and the like.
The source power and control circuitry 2302 may be powered from multiple AC-or-DC voltage sources 2502 and may contain AC-to-DC and DC-to-DC converters 2408S to provide necessary voltage levels for the circuit components as well as DC voltages for the power amplifiers that may be used to drive the source resonator. The DC voltages may be adjustable and may be used to control the output power level of the power amplifier. The source may contain power factor correction circuitry.
The oscillator 2508 output may be used as the input to a power amplifier 2504 that drives the source resonator 102S. The oscillator frequency may be tunable and the amplitude of the oscillator signal may be varied as one means to control the output power level from the power amplifier. The frequency, amplitude, phase, waveform, and duty cycle of the oscillator signal may be controlled by analog circuitry, by digital circuitry or by a combination of analog and digital circuitry. The control circuitry may include a processor 2410S, such as a microprocessor, a digital signal processor, a field programmable gate array processor, and the like.
The impedance matching blocks 2402 of the source and device resonators may be used to tune the power and control circuits and the source and device resonators. For example, tuning of these circuits may adjust for perturbation of the quality factor Q of the source or device resonators due to extraneous objects or changes in distance between the source and device in a system. Tuning of these circuits may also be used to sense the operating environment, control power flow to one or more devices, to control power to a wireless power network, to reduce power when unsafe or failure mode conditions are detected, and the like.
Any combination of power, voltage, and current signals may be monitored at any point in the source circuitry. These signals may be monitored using analog or digital or combined analog and digital techniques. These monitored signals may be used in feedback circuits or may be reported to the user in a variety of known ways or they may be stored and retrieved at later times. These signals may be used to alert a user to system failures, to alert a user to exceeded safety thresholds, to indicate performance, or to provide audio, visual, vibrational, and the like, feedback to a user of the system.
The source power and control circuitry may contain a processor. The processor may be used to read the state or the operating point of the power and control circuitry and the source resonator. The processor may implement algorithms to interpret and adjust the operating point of the circuits, elements, components, subsystems and resonator. The processor may be used to adjust the impedance matching, the resonator, the DC-to-DC converters, the AC-to-DC converters, the oscillator, the power amplifier of the source, and the like. The processor and adjustable components of the system may be used to implement frequency and/or time power delivery multiplexing schemes. The processor may have wireless or wired data communication links to devices and other sources and may transmit or receive data that can be used to adjust the operating point of the system.
Although detailed and specific designs are shown in these block diagrams, it should be clear to those skilled in the art that many different modifications and rearrangements of the components and building blocks are possible within the spirit of the exemplary system. The division of the circuitry was outlined for illustrative purposes and it should be clear to those skilled in the art that the components of each block may be further divided into smaller blocks or merged or shared. In equivalent examples the power and control circuitry may be composed of individual discrete components or larger integrated circuits. For example, the rectifier circuitry may be composed of discrete diodes, or use diodes integrated on a single chip. A multitude of other circuits and integrated devices can be substituted in the design depending on design criteria such as power or size or cost or application. The whole of the power and control circuitry or any portion of the source or device circuitry may be integrated into one chip.
The impedance matching network of the device and or source may include a capacitor or networks of capacitors, an inductor or networks of inductors, or any combination of capacitors, inductors, diodes, switches, resistors, and the like. The components of the impedance matching network may be adjustable and variable and may be controlled to affect the efficiency and operating point of the system. The impedance matching may be performed by controlling the connection point of the resonator, adjusting the permeability of a magnetic material, controlling a bias field, adjusting the frequency of excitation, and the like. The impedance matching may use or include any number or combination of varactors, varactor arrays, switched elements, capacitor banks, switched and tunable elements, reverse bias diodes, air gap capacitors, compression capacitors, BZT electrically tuned capacitors, MEMS-tunable capacitors, voltage variable dielectrics, transformer coupled tuning circuits, and the like. The variable components may be mechanically tuned, thermally tuned, electrically tuned, piezo-electrically tuned, and the like. Elements of the impedance matching may be silicon devices, gallium nitride devices, silicon carbide devices and the like. The elements may be chosen to withstand high currents, high voltages, high powers, or any combination of current, voltage and power. The elements may be chosen to be high-Q elements.
The matching and tuning calculations of the source may be performed on an external device through a USB port that powers the device. The device may be a computer a PDA or other computational platform.
A demonstration system used a source resonator, coupled to a device resonator, to wirelessly power/recharge multiple electronic consumer devices including, but not limited to, a laptop, a DVD player, a projector, a cell-phone, a display, a television, a projector, a digital picture frame, a light, a TV/DVD player, a portable music player, a circuit breaker, a hand-held tool, a personal digital assistant, an external battery charger, a mouse, a keyboard, a camera, an active load, and the like. A variety of devices may be powered simultaneously from a single device resonator. Device resonators may be operated simultaneously as source resonators. The power supplied to a device resonator may pass through additional resonators before being delivered to its intended device resonator.
Monitoring, Feedback and Control
So-called port parameter measurement circuitry may measure or monitor certain power, voltage, and current, signals in the system and processors or control circuits may adjust certain settings or operating parameters based on those measurements. In addition to these port parameter measurements, the magnitude and phase of voltage and current signals, and the magnitude of the power signals, throughout the system may be accessed to measure or monitor the system performance. The measured signals referred to throughout this disclosure may be any combination of the port parameter signals, as well as voltage signals, current signals, power signals, and the like. These parameters may be measured using analog or digital signals, they may be sampled and processed, and they may be digitized or converted using a number of known analog and digital processing techniques. Measured or monitored signals may be used in feedback circuits or systems to control the operation of the resonators and/or the system. In general, we refer to these monitored or measured signals as reference signals, or port parameter measurements or signals, although they are sometimes also referred to as error signals, monitor signals, feedback signals, and the like. We will refer to the signals that are used to control circuit elements such as the voltages used to drive voltage controlled capacitors as the control signals.
In some cases the circuit elements may be adjusted to achieve a specified or predetermined impedance value for the source and device resonators. In other cases the impedance may be adjusted to achieve a desired impedance value for the source and device resonators when the device resonator is connected to a power consumer or consumers. In other cases the impedance may be adjusted to mitigate changes in the resonant frequency, or impedance or power level changes owing to movement of the source and/or device resonators, or changes in the environment (such as the movement of interacting materials or objects) in the vicinity of the resonators. In other cases the impedance of the source and device resonators may be adjusted to different impedance values.
The coupled resonators may be made of different materials and may include different circuits, components and structural designs or they may be the same. The coupled resonators may include performance monitoring and measurement circuitry, signal processing and control circuitry or a combination of measurement and control circuitry. Some or all of the high-Q magnetic resonators may include tunable impedance circuits. Some or all of the high-Q magnetic resonators may include automatically controlled tunable impedance circuits.
FIG. 41 shows a magnetic resonator with port parameter measurement circuitry 3802 configured to measure certain parameters of the resonator. The port parameter measurement circuitry may measure the input impedance of the structure, or the reflected power. Port parameter measurement circuits may be included in the source and/or device resonator designs and may be used to measure two port circuit parameters such as S-parameters (scattering parameters), Z-parameters (impedance parameters), Y-parameters (admittance parameters), T-parameters (transmission parameters), H-parameters (hybrid parameters), ABCD-parameters (chain, cascade or transmission parameters), and the like. These parameters may be used to describe the electrical behavior of linear electrical networks when various types of signals are applied.
Different parameters may be used to characterize the electrical network under different operating or coupling scenarios. For example, S-parameters may be used to measure matched and unmatched loads. In addition, the magnitude and phase of voltage and current signals within the magnetic resonators and/or within the sources and devices themselves may be monitored at a variety of points to yield system performance information. This information may be presented to users of the system via a user interface such as a light, a read-out, a beep, a noise, a vibration or the like, or it may be presented as a digital signal or it may be provided to a processor in the system and used in the automatic control of the system. This information may be logged, stored, or may be used by higher level monitoring and control systems.
FIG. 42 shows a circuit diagram of a magnetic resonator where the tunable impedance network may be realized with voltage controlled capacitors 3902 or capacitor networks. Such an implementation may be adjusted, tuned or controlled by electrical circuits and/or computer processors, such as a programmable voltage source 3908, and the like. For example, the voltage controlled capacitors may be adjusted in response to data acquired by the port parameter measurement circuitry 3802 and processed by a measurement analysis and control algorithm subsystem 3904. Reference signals may be derived from the port parameter measurement circuitry or other monitoring circuitry designed to measure the degree of deviation from a desired system operating point. The measured reference signals may include voltage, current, complex-impedance, reflection coefficient, power levels and the like, at one or several points in the system and at a single frequency or at multiple frequencies.
The reference signals may be fed to measurement analysis and control algorithm subsystem modules that may generate control signals to change the values of various components in a tunable impedance matching network. The control signals may vary the resonant frequency and/or the input impedance of the magnetic resonator, or the power level supplied by the source, or the power level drawn by the device, to achieve the desired power exchange between power supplies/generators and power drains/loads.
Adjustment algorithms may be used to adjust the frequency and/or impedance of the magnetic resonators. The algorithms may take in reference signals related to the degree of deviation from a desired operating point for the system and output correction or control signals related to that deviation that control variable or tunable elements of the system to bring the system back towards the desired operating point or points. The reference signals for the magnetic resonators may be acquired while the resonators are exchanging power in a wireless power transmission system, or they may be switched out of the circuit during system operation. Corrections to the system may be applied or performed continuously, periodically, upon a threshold crossing, digitally, using analog methods, and the like.
FIG. 43 shows an end-to-end wireless power transmission system. Both the source and the device may include port measurement circuitry 3802 and a processor 2410. The box labeled “coupler/switch” 4002 indicates that the port measurement circuitry 3802 may be connected to the resonator 102 by a directional coupler or a switch, enabling the measurement, adjustment and control of the source and device resonators to take place in conjunction with, or separate from, the power transfer functionality.
The port parameter measurement and/or processing circuitry may reside with some, any, or all resonators in a system. The port parameter measurement circuitry may utilize portions of the power transmission signal or may utilize excitation signals over a range of frequencies to measure the source/device resonator response (i.e. transmission and reflection between any two ports in the system), and may contain amplitude and/or phase information. Such measurements may be achieved with a swept single frequency signal or a multi-frequency signal. The signals used to measure and monitor the resonators and the wireless power transmission system may be generated by a processor or processors and standard input/output (I/O) circuitry including digital to analog converters (DACs), analog to digital converters (ADCs), amplifiers, signal generation chips, passive components and the like. Measurements may be achieved using test equipment such as a network analyzer or using customized circuitry. The measured reference signals may be digitized by ADCs and processed using customized algorithms running on a computer, a microprocessor, a DSP chip, an ASIC, and the like. The measured reference signals may be processed in an analog control loop.
The measurement circuitry may measure any set of two port parameters such as S-parameters, Y-parameters, Z-parameters, H-parameters, G-parameters, T-parameters, ABCD-parameters, and the like. Measurement circuitry may be used to characterize current and voltage signals at various points in the drive and resonator circuitry, the impedance and/or admittance of the source and device resonators at opposite ends of the system, i.e. looking into the source resonator matching network (“port 1” in FIG. 43) towards the device and vice versa.
The device may measure relevant signals and/or port parameters, interpret the measurement data, and adjust its matching network to optimize the impedance looking into the coupled system independently of the actions of the source. The source may measure relevant port parameters, interpret the measurement data, and adjust its matching network to optimize the impedance looking into the coupled system independently of the actions of the device.
FIG. 43 shows a block diagram of a source and device in a wireless power transmission system. The system may be configured to execute a control algorithm that actively adjusts the tuning/matching networks in either of or both the source and device resonators to optimize performance in the coupled system. Port measurement circuitry 3802S may measure signals in the source and communicate those signals to a processor 2410. A processor 2410 may use the measured signals in a performance optimization or stabilization algorithm and generate control signals based on the outputs of those algorithms. Control signals may be applied to variable circuit elements in the tuning/impedance matching circuits 2402S to adjust the source's operating characteristics, such as power in the resonator and coupling to devices. Control signals may be applied to the power supply or generator to turn the supply on or off, to increase or decrease the power level, to modulate the supply signal and the like.
The power exchanged between sources and devices may depend on a variety of factors. These factors may include the effective impedance of the sources and devices, the Q's of the sources and devices, the resonant frequencies of the sources and devices, the distances between sources and devices, the interaction of materials and objects in the vicinity of sources and devices and the like. The port measurement circuitry and processing algorithms may work in concert to adjust the resonator parameters to maximize power transfer, to hold the power transfer constant, to controllably adjust the power transfer, and the like, under both dynamic and steady state operating conditions.
Some, all or none of the sources and devices in a system implementation may include port measurement circuitry 3802S and processing 2410 capabilities. FIG. 44 shows an end-to-end wireless power transmission system in which only the source 102S contains port measurement circuitry 3802 and a processor 2410S. In this case, the device resonator 102D operating characteristics may be fixed or may be adjusted by analog control circuitry and without the need for control signals generated by a processor.
FIG. 45 shows an end-to-end wireless power transmission system. Both the source and the device may include port measurement circuitry 3802 but in the system of FIG. 45, only the source contains a processor 2410S. The source and device may be in communication with each other and the adjustment of certain system parameters may be in response to control signals that have been wirelessly communicated, such as though wireless communications circuitry 4202, between the source and the device. The wireless communication channel 4204 may be separate from the wireless power transfer channel 4208, or it may be the same. That is, the resonators 102 used for power exchange may also be used to exchange information. In some cases, information may be exchanged by modulating a component a source or device circuit and sensing that change with port parameter or other monitoring equipment.
Implementations where only the source contains a processor 2410 may be beneficial for multi-device systems where the source can handle all of the tuning and adjustment “decisions” and simply communicate the control signals back to the device(s). This implementation may make the device smaller and cheaper because it may eliminate the need for, or reduce the required functionality of, a processor in the device. A portion of or an entire data set from each port measurement at each device may be sent back to the source microprocessor for analysis, and the control instructions may be sent back to the devices. These communications may be wireless communications.
FIG. 46 shows an end-to-end wireless power transmission system. In this example, only the source contains port measurement circuitry 3802 and a processor 2410S. The source and device may be in communication, such as via wireless communication circuitry 4202, with each other and the adjustment of certain system parameters may be in response to control signals that have been wirelessly communicated between the source and the device.
FIG. 47 shows coupled electromagnetic resonators 102 whose frequency and impedance may be automatically adjusted using a processor or a computer. Resonant frequency tuning and continuous impedance adjustment of the source and device resonators may be implemented with reverse biased diodes, Schottky diodes and/or varactor elements contained within the capacitor networks shown as C1, C2, and C3 in FIG. 47. The circuit topology that was built and demonstrated and is described here is exemplary and is not meant to limit the discussion of automatic system tuning and control in any way. Other circuit topologies could be utilized with the measurement and control architectures discussed in this disclosure.
Device and source resonator impedances and resonant frequencies may be measured with a network analyzer 4402A-B, or by other means described above, and implemented with a controller, such as with Lab View 4404. The measurement circuitry or equipment may output data to a computer or a processor that implements feedback algorithms and dynamically adjusts the frequencies and impedances via a programmable DC voltage source.
In one arrangement, the reverse biased diodes (Schottky, semiconductor junction, and the like) used to realize the tunable capacitance drew very little DC current and could be reverse biased by amplifiers having large series output resistances. This implementation may enable DC control signals to be applied directly to the controllable circuit elements in the resonator circuit while maintaining a very high-Q in the magnetic resonator.
C2 biasing signals may be isolated from C1 and/or C3 biasing signals with a DC blocking capacitor as shown in FIG. 47, if the required DC biasing voltages are different. The output of the biasing amplifiers may be bypassed to circuit ground to isolate RF voltages from the biasing amplifiers, and to keep non-fundamental RF voltages from being injected into the resonator. The reverse bias voltages for some of the capacitors may instead be applied through the inductive element in the resonator itself, because the inductive element acts as a short circuit at DC.
The port parameter measurement circuitry may exchange signals with a processor (including any required ADCs and DACs) as part of a feedback or control system that is used to automatically adjust the resonant frequency, input impedance, energy stored or captured by the resonator or power delivered by a source or to a device load. The processor may also send control signals to tuning or adjustment circuitry in or attached to the magnetic resonator.
When utilizing varactors or diodes as tunable capacitors, it may be beneficial to place fixed capacitors in parallel and in series with the tunable capacitors operating at high reverse bias voltages in the tuning/matching circuits. This arrangement may yield improvements in circuit and system stability and in power handling capability by optimizing the operating voltages on the tunable capacitors.
Varactors or other reverse biased diodes may be used as a voltage controlled capacitor. Arrays of varactors may be used when higher voltage compliance or different capacitance is required than that of a single varactor component. Varactors may be arranged in an N by M array connected serially and in parallel and treated as a single two terminal component with different characteristics than the individual varactors in the array. For example, an N by N array of equal varactors where components in each row are connected in parallel and components in each column are connected in series may be used as a two terminal device with the same capacitance as any single varactor in the array but with a voltage compliance that is N times that of a single varactor in the array. Depending on the variability and differences of parameters of the individual varactors in the array additional biasing circuits composed of resistors, inductors, and the like may be needed. A schematic of a four by four array of unbiased varactors 4502 that may be suitable for magnetic resonator applications is shown in FIG. 48.
Further improvements in system performance may be realized by careful selection of the fixed value capacitor(s) that are placed in parallel and/or in series with the tunable (varactor/diode/capacitor) elements. Multiple fixed capacitors that are switched in or out of the circuit may be able to compensate for changes in resonator Q's, impedances, resonant frequencies, power levels, coupling strengths, and the like, that might be encountered in test, development and operational wireless power transfer systems. Switched capacitor banks and other switched element banks may be used to assure the convergence to the operating frequencies and impedance values required by the system design.
An exemplary control algorithm for isolated and coupled magnetic resonators may be described for the circuit and system elements shown in FIG. 47. One control algorithm first adjusts each of the source and device resonator loops “in isolation”, that is, with the other resonators in the system “shorted out” or “removed” from the system. For practical purposes, a resonator can be “shorted out” by making it resonant at a much lower frequency such as by maximizing the value of C1 and/or C3. This step effectively reduces the coupling between the resonators, thereby effectively reducing the system to a single resonator at a particular frequency and impedance.
Tuning a magnetic resonator in isolation includes varying the tunable elements in the tuning and matching circuits until the values measured by the port parameter measurement circuitry are at their predetermined, calculated or measured relative values. The desired values for the quantities measured by the port parameter measurement circuitry may be chosen based on the desired matching impedance, frequency, strong coupling parameter, and the like. For the exemplary algorithms disclosed below, the port parameter measurement circuitry measures S-parameters over a range of frequencies. The range of frequencies used to characterize the resonators may be a compromise between the system performance information obtained and computation/measurement speed. For the algorithms described below the frequency range may be approximately +/−20% of the operating resonant frequency.
Each isolated resonator may be tuned as follows. First, short out the resonator not being adjusted. Next minimize C1, C2, and C3, in the resonator that is being characterized and adjusted. In most cases there will be fixed circuit elements in parallel with C1, C2, and C3, so this step does not reduce the capacitance values to zero. Next, start increasing C2 until the resonator impedance is matched to the “target” real impedance at any frequency in the range of measurement frequencies described above. The initial “target” impedance may be less than the expected operating impedance for the coupled system.
C2 may be adjusted until the initial “target” impedance is realized for a frequency in the measurement range. Then C1 and/or C3 may be adjusted until the loop is resonant at the desired operating frequency.
Each resonator may be adjusted according to the above algorithm. After tuning each resonator in isolation, a second feedback algorithm may be applied to optimize the resonant frequencies and/or input impedances for wirelessly transferring power in the coupled system.
The required adjustments to C1 and/or C2 and/or C3 in each resonator in the coupled system may be determined by measuring and processing the values of the real and imaginary parts of the input impedance from either and/or both “port(s)” shown in FIG. 43. For coupled resonators, changing the input impedance of one resonator may change the input impedance of the other resonator. Control and tracking algorithms may adjust one port to a desired operating point based on measurements at that port, and then adjust the other port based on measurements at that other port. These steps may be repeated until both sides converge to the desired operating point.
S-parameters may be measured at both the source and device ports and the following series of measurements and adjustments may be made. In the description that follows, Z0 is an input impedance and may be the target impedance. In some cases Z0 is 50 ohms or is near 50 ohms. Z1 and Z2 are intermediate impedance values that may be the same value as Z0 or may be different than Z0. Re{value} means the real part of a value and Im{value} means the imaginary part of a value.
An algorithm that may be used to adjust the input impedance and resonant frequency of two coupled resonators is set forth below:

    
    
        1) Adjust each resonator “in isolation” as described above.
        2) Adjust source C1/C3 until, at ωo, Re{S11}=(Z1+/−∈Re) as follows:
        
            If Re{S11 @ ωo}>(Z1+∈Re), decrease C1/C3. If Re{S11 @ ωo}<(Zo−∈Re), increase C1/C3.
        
        
        3) Adjust source C2 until, at ωo, Im{S11}=(+/−∈Im) as follows:
        
            If Im{S11 @ ωo}>∈Im, decrease C2. If Im{S11 @ ωo}<−∈Im, increase C2.
        
        
        4) Adjust device C1/C3 until, at ω0, Re{S22}=(Z2+/−∈Re) as follows:
        
            If Re{S22 @ ωo}>(Z2+∈Re), decrease C1/C3. If Re{S22 @ ωo}<(Zo−∈Re), increase C1/C3.
        
        
        5) Adjust device C2 until, at ωo, Im{S22}=0 as follows:
        
            If Im{S22 @ ωo}>∈Im, decrease C2. If Im{S22 @ ωo}<−∈Im, increase C2.
        
        
    
    


We have achieved a working system by repeating steps 1-4 until both (Re{S11}, Im{S11}) and (Re{S22}, Im{S22}) converge to ((Z0+/−∈Re), (+/−∈Im)) at ωo, where Z0 is the desired matching impedance and ωo is the desired operating frequency. Here, ∈Im represents the maximum deviation of the imaginary part, at ωo, from the desired value of 0, and ∈Re represents the maximum deviation of the real part from the desired value of Z0. It is understood that ∈Im and ∈Re can be adjusted to increase or decrease the number of steps to convergence at the potential cost of system performance (efficiency). It is also understood that steps 1-4 can be performed in a variety of sequences and a variety of ways other than that outlined above (i.e. first adjust the source imaginary part, then the source real part; or first adjust the device real part, then the device imaginary part, etc.) The intermediate impedances Z1 and Z2 may be adjusted during steps 1-4 to reduce the number of steps required for convergence. The desire or target impedance value may be complex, and may vary in time or under different operating scenarios.
Steps 1-4 may be performed in any order, in any combination and any number of times. Having described the above algorithm, variations to the steps or the described implementation may be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. The algorithm outlined above may be implemented with any equivalent linear network port parameter measurements (i.e., Z-parameters, Y-parameters, T-parameters, H-parameters, ABCD-parameters, etc.) or other monitor signals described above, in the same way that impedance or admittance can be alternatively used to analyze a linear circuit to derive the same result.
The resonators may need to be retuned owing to changes in the “loaded” resistances, Rs and Rd, caused by changes in the mutual inductance M (coupling) between the source and device resonators. Changes in the inductances, Ls and Ld, of the inductive elements themselves may be caused by the influence of external objects, as discussed earlier, and may also require compensation. Such variations may be mitigated by the adjustment algorithm described above.
A directional coupler or a switch may be used to connect the port parameter measurement circuitry to the source resonator and tuning/adjustment circuitry. The port parameter measurement circuitry may measure properties of the magnetic resonator while it is exchanging power in a wireless power transmission system, or it may be switched out of the circuit during system operation. The port parameter measurement circuitry may measure the parameters and the processor may control certain tunable elements of the magnetic resonator at start-up, or at certain intervals, or in response to changes in certain system operating parameters.
A wireless power transmission system may include circuitry to vary or tune the impedance and/or resonant frequency of source and device resonators. Note that while tuning circuitry is shown in both the source and device resonators, the circuitry may instead be included in only the source or the device resonators, or the circuitry may be included in only some of the source and/or device resonators. Note too that while we may refer to the circuitry as “tuning” the impedance and or resonant frequency of the resonators, this tuning operation simply means that various electrical parameters such as the inductance or capacitance of the structure are being varied. In some cases, these parameters may be varied to achieve a specific predetermined value, in other cases they may be varied in response to a control algorithm or to stabilize a target performance value that is changing. In some cases, the parameters are varied as a function of temperature, of other sources or devices in the area, of the environment, at the like.
Applications
For each listed application, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill-in-the-art that there are a variety of ways that the resonator structures used to enable wireless power transmission may be connected or integrated with the objects that are supplying or being powered. The resonator may be physically separate from the source and device objects. The resonator may supply or remove power from an object using traditional inductive techniques or through direct electrical connection, with a wire or cable for example. The electrical connection may be from the resonator output to the AC or DC power input port on the object. The electrical connection may be from the output power port of an object to the resonator input.
FIG. 49 shows a source resonator 4904 that is physically separated from a power supply and a device resonator 4902 that is physically separated from the device 4900, in this illustration a laptop computer. Power may be supplied to the source resonator, and power may be taken from the device resonator directly, by an electrical connection. One of ordinary skill in the art will understand from the materials incorporated by reference that the shape, size, material composition, arrangement, position and orientation of the resonators above are provided by way of non-limiting example, and that a wide variation in any and all of these parameters could be supported by the disclosed technology for a variety of applications.
Continuing with the example of the laptop, and without limitation, the device resonator may be physically connected to the device it is powering or charging. For example, as shown in FIG. 50A and FIG. 50B, the device resonator 5002 may be (a) integrated into the housing of the device 5000 or (b) it may be attached by an adapter. The resonator 5002 may (FIG. 50B-FIG. 50D) or may not (FIG. 50A) be visible on the device. The resonator may be affixed to the device, integrated into the device, plugged into the device, and the like.
The source resonator may be physically connected to the source supplying the power to the system. As described above for the devices and device resonators, there are a variety of ways the resonators may be attached to, connected to or integrated with the power supply. One of ordinary skill in the art will understand that there are a variety of ways the resonators may be integrated in the wireless power transmission system, and that the sources and devices may utilize similar or different integration techniques.
Continuing again with the example of the laptop computer, and without limitation, the laptop computer may be powered, charged or recharged by a wireless power transmission system. A source resonator may be used to supply wireless power and a device resonator may be used to capture the wireless power. A device resonator 5002 may be integrated into the edge of the screen (display) as illustrated in FIG. 50D, and/or into the base of the laptop as illustrated in FIG. 50C. The source resonator 5002 may be integrated into the base of the laptop and the device resonator may be integrated into the edge of the screen. The resonators may also or instead be affixed to the power source and/or the laptop. The source and device resonators may also or instead be physically separated from the power supply and the laptop and may be electrically connected by a cable. The source and device resonators may also or instead be physically separated from the power supply and the laptop and may be electrically coupled using a traditional inductive technique. One of ordinary skill in the art will understand that, while the preceding examples relate to wireless power transmission to a laptop, that the methods and systems disclosed for this application may be suitably adapted for use with other electrical or electronic devices. In general, the source resonator may be external to the source and supplying power to a device resonator that in turn supplies power the device, or the source resonator may be connected to the source and supplying power to a device resonator that in turn supplies power to a portion of the device, or the source resonator may internal to the source and supplying power to a device resonator that in turn supplies power to a portion of the device, as well as any combination of these.
In some systems, the source, or source resonator may be movable or active and may track, follow, or attach to the source or source resonator. For a movable device it may be preferable to maintain alignment between the source resonator and the device resonator to maximize power transfer efficiency. As a device moves a source or a source resonator may track the position of the device or device resonator and adjust its position to ensure optimum or improved alignment. The device tracking by the source may be automatic. A source may include sensors for determining the position of the device and means for adjusting its position, such as by actuators, motors, magnets, and the like. The source may sense the position of the device by measuring power efficiency, magnetic fields, signals generated by the device, optical recognition, and the like. In some embodiments the source may partially attach to the device. A source and device may include magnets which attach the source and device together. A magnetic attachment may be functional through a supporting structure such as a table. The magnetic attachment will attach the source through the supporting structure making a freely movable source to follow the device as it moves. For example, continuing with the laptop example, a source mounted on a freely movable structure may be mounted under a supporting structure such as a table surface, dock, box, and the like. A laptop, with a magnetic attachment placed on top of the table surface will attract the source below the supporting structure and result in proper alignment. Furthermore, as the laptop with the device resonator is moved, or slid on top of the supporting structure, the freely movable source and source resonator may follow the device resonator of the laptop due to the magnetic attraction between the source and the device without requiring active movement mechanisms. In some embodiments, a combination of active and passive movement mechanisms may be used, such that for example, move the source into initial alignment with the device whereupon magnetic attachment means ensures that the source may passively follow the device as it moves.
A system or method disclosed herein may provide power to an electrical or electronics device, such as, and not limited to, phones, cell phones, cordless phones, smart phones, PDAs, audio devices, music players, MP3 players, radios, portable radios and players, wireless headphones, wireless headsets, computers, laptop computers, wireless keyboards, wireless mouse, televisions, displays, flat screen displays, computer displays, displays embedded in furniture, digital picture frames, electronic books, (e.g. the Kindle, e-ink books, magazines, and the like), remote control units (also referred to as controllers, game controllers, commanders, clickers, and the like, and used for the remote control of a plurality of electronics devices, such as televisions, video games, displays, computers, audio visual equipment, lights, and the like), lighting devices, cooling devices, air circulation devices, purification devices, personal hearing aids, power tools, security systems, alarms, bells, flashing lights, sirens, sensors, loudspeakers, electronic locks, electronic keypads, light switches, other electrical switches, and the like. Here the term electronic lock is used to indicate a door lock which operates electronically (e.g. with electronic combo-key, magnetic card, RFID card, and the like) which is placed on a door instead of a mechanical key-lock. Such locks are often battery operated, risking the possibility that the lock might stop working when a battery dies, leaving the user locked-out. This may be avoided where the battery is either charged or completely replaced by a wireless power transmission implementation as described herein.
Here, the term light switch (or other electrical switch) is meant to indicate any switch (e.g. on a wall of a room) in one part of the room that turns on/off a device (e.g. light fixture at the center of the ceiling) in another part of the room. To install such a switch by direct connection, one would have to run a wire all the way from the device to the switch. Once such a switch is installed at a particular spot, it may be very difficult to move. Alternately, one can envision a ‘wireless switch’, where “wireless” means the switching (on/off) commands are communicated wirelessly, but such a switch has traditionally required a battery for operation. In general, having too many battery operated switches around a house may be impractical, because those many batteries will need to be replaced periodically. So, a wirelessly communicating switch may be more convenient, provided it is also wirelessly powered. For example, there already exist communications wireless door-bells that are battery powered, but where one still has to replace the battery in them periodically. The remote doorbell button may be made to be completely wireless, where there may be no need to ever replace the battery again. Note that here, the term ‘cordless’ or ‘wireless’ or ‘communications wireless’ is used to indicate that there is a cordless or wireless communications facility between the device and another electrical component, such as the base station for a cordless phone, the computer for a wireless keyboard, and the like. One skilled in the art will recognize that any electrical or electronics device may include a wireless communications facility, and that the systems and methods described herein may be used to add wireless power transmission to the device. As described herein, power to the electrical or electronics device may be delivered from an external or internal source resonator, and to the device or portion of the device. Wireless power transmission may significantly reduce the need to charge and/or replace batteries for devices that enter the near vicinity of the source resonator and thereby may reduce the downtime, cost and disposal issues often associated with batteries.
The systems and methods described herein may provide power to lights without the need for either wired power or batteries. That is, the systems and methods described herein may provide power to lights without wired connection to any power source, and provide the energy to the light non-radiatively across mid-range distances, such as across a distance of a quarter of a meter, one meter, three meters, and the like. A ‘light’ as used herein may refer to the light source itself, such as an incandescent light bulb, florescent light bulb lamps, Halogen lamps, gas discharge lamps, fluorescent lamps, neon lamps, high-intensity discharge lamps, sodium vapor lamps, Mercury-vapor lamps, electroluminescent lamps, light emitting diodes (LED) lamps, and the like; the light as part of a light fixture, such as a table lamp, a floor lamp, a ceiling lamp, track lighting, recessed light fixtures, and the like; light fixtures integrated with other functions, such as a light/ceiling fan fixture, and illuminated picture frame, and the like. As such, the systems and methods described herein may reduce the complexity for installing a light, such as by minimizing the installation of electrical wiring, and allowing the user to place or mount the light with minimal regard to sources of wired power. For instance, a light may be placed anywhere in the vicinity of a source resonator, where the source resonator may be mounted in a plurality of different places with respect to the location of the light, such as on the floor of the room above, (e.g. as in the case of a ceiling light and especially when the room above is the attic); on the wall of the next room, on the ceiling of the room below, (e.g. as in the case of a floor lamp); in a component within the room or in the infrastructure of the room as described herein; and the like. For example, a light/ceiling fan combination is often installed in a master bedroom, and the master bedroom often has the attic above it. In this instance a user may more easily install the light/ceiling fan combination in the master bedroom, such as by simply mounting the light/ceiling fan combination to the ceiling, and placing a source coil (plugged into the house wired AC power) in the attic above the mounted fixture. In another example, the light may be an external light, such as a flood light or security light, and the source resonator mounted inside the structure. This way of installing lighting may be particularly beneficial to users who rent their homes, because now they may be able to mount lights and such other electrical components without the need to install new electrical wiring. The control for the light may also be communicated by near-field communications as described herein, or by traditional wireless communications methods.
The systems and methods described herein may provide power from a source resonator to a device resonator that is either embedded into the device component, or outside the device component, such that the device component may be a traditional electrical component or fixture. For instance, a ceiling lamp may be designed or retrofitted with a device resonator integrated into the fixture, or the ceiling lamp may be a traditional wired fixture, and plugged into a separate electrical facility equipped with the device resonator. In an example, the electrical facility may be a wireless junction box designed to have a device resonator for receiving wireless power, say from a source resonator placed on the floor of the room above (e.g. the attic), and which contains a number of traditional outlets that are powered from the device resonator. The wireless junction box, mounted on the ceiling, may now provide power to traditional wired electrical components on the ceiling (e.g. a ceiling light, track lighting, a ceiling fan). Thus, the ceiling lamp may now be mounted to the ceiling without the need to run wires through the infrastructure of the building. This type of device resonator to traditional outlet junction box may be used in a plurality of applications, including being designed for the interior or exterior of a building, to be made portable, made for a vehicle, and the like. Wireless power may be transferred through common building materials, such as wood, wall board, insulation, glass. brick, stone, concrete, and the like. The benefits of reduced installation cost, re-configurability, and increased application flexibility may provide the user significant benefits over traditional wired installations. The device resonator for a traditional outlet junction box may include a plurality of electrical components for facilitating the transfer of power from the device resonator to the traditional outlets, such as power source electronics which convert the specific frequencies needed to implement efficient power transfer to line voltage, power capture electronics which may convert high frequency AC to usable voltage and frequencies (AC and/or DC), controls which synchronize the capture device and the power output and which ensure consistent, safe, and maximally efficient power transfer, and the like.
The systems and methods described herein may provide advantages to lights or electrical components that operate in environments that are wet, harsh, controlled, and the like, such has outside and exposed to the rain, in a pool/sauna/shower, in a maritime application, in hermetically sealed components, in an explosive-proof room, on outside signage, a harsh industrial environment in a volatile environment (e.g. from volatile vapors or airborne organics, such as in a grain silo or bakery), and the like. For example, a light mounted under the water level of a pool is normally difficult to wire up, and is required to be water-sealed despite the need for external wires. But a pool light using the principles disclosed herein may more easily be made water sealed, as there may be no external wires needed. In another example, an explosion proof room, such as containing volatile vapors, may not only need to be hermetically sealed, but may need to have all electrical contacts (that could create a spark) sealed. Again, the principles disclosed herein may provide a convenient way to supply sealed electrical components for such applications.
The systems and methods disclosed herein may provide power to game controller applications, such as to a remote handheld game controller. These game controllers may have been traditionally powered solely by batteries, where the game controller's use and power profile caused frequent changing of the battery, battery pack, rechargeable batteries, and the like, that may not have been ideal for the consistent use to the game controller, such as during extended game play. A device resonator may be placed into the game controller, and a source resonator, connected to a power source, may be placed in the vicinity. Further, the device resonator in the game controller may provide power directly to the game controller electronics without a battery; provide power to a battery, battery pack, rechargeable battery, and the like, which then provides power to the game controller electronics; and the like. The game controller may utilize multiple battery packs, where each battery pack is equipped with a device resonator, and thus may be constantly recharging while in the vicinity of the source resonator, whether plugged into the game controller or not. The source resonator may be resident in a main game controller facility for the game, where the main game controller facility and source resonator are supplied power from AC ‘house’ power; resident in an extension facility form AC power, such as in a source resonator integrated into an ‘extension cord’; resident in a game chair, which is at least one of plugged into the wall AC, plugged into the main game controller facility, powered by a battery pack in the game chair; and the like. The source resonator may be placed and implemented in any of the configurations described herein.
The systems and methods disclosed herein may integrate device resonators into battery packs, such as battery packs that are interchangeable with other battery packs. For instance, some portable devices may use up electrical energy at a high rate such that a user may need to have multiple interchangeable battery packs on hand for use, or the user may operate the device out of range of a source resonator and need additional battery packs to continue operation, such as for power tools, portable lights, remote control vehicles, and the like. The use of the principles disclosed herein may not only provide a way for device resonator enabled battery packs to be recharged while in use and in range, but also for the recharging of battery packs not currently in use and placed in range of a source resonator. In this way, battery packs may always be ready to use when a user runs down the charge of a battery pack being used. For example, a user may be working with a wireless power tool, where the current requirements may be greater than can be realized through direct powering from a source resonator. In this case, despite the fact that the systems and methods described herein may be providing charging power to the in-use battery pack while in range, the battery pack may still run down, as the power usage may have exceeded the recharge rate. Further, the user may simply be moving in and out of range, or be completely out of range while using the device. However, the user may have placed additional battery packs in the vicinity of the source resonator, which have been recharged while not in use, and are now charged sufficiently for use. In another example, the user may be working with the power tool away from the vicinity of the source resonator, but leave the supplemental battery packs to charge in the vicinity of the source resonator, such as in a room with a portable source resonator or extension cord source resonator, in the user's vehicle, in user's tool box, and the like. In this way, the user may not have to worry about taking the time to, and/or remembering to plug in their battery packs for future use. The user may only have to change out the used battery pack for the charged battery pack and place the used one in the vicinity of the source resonator for recharging. Device resonators may be built into enclosures with known battery form factors and footprints and may replace traditional chemical batteries in known devices and applications. For example, device resonators may be built into enclosures with mechanical dimensions equivalent to AA batteries, AAA batteries, D batteries, 9V batteries, laptop batteries, cell phone batteries, and the like. The enclosures may include a smaller “button battery” in addition to the device resonator to store charge and provide extended operation, either in terms of time or distance. Other energy storage devices in addition to or instead of button batteries may be integrated with the device resonators and any associated power conversion circuitry. These new energy packs may provide similar voltage and current levels as provided by traditional batteries, but may be composed of device resonators, power conversion electronics, a small battery, and the like. These new energy packs may last longer than traditional batteries because they may be more easily recharged and may be recharging constantly when they are located in a wireless power zone. In addition, such energy packs may be lighter than traditional batteries, may be safer to use and store, may operate over wider temperature and humidity ranges, may be less harmful to the environment when thrown away, and the like. As described herein, these energy packs may last beyond the life of the product when used in wireless power zones as described herein.
The systems and methods described herein may be used to power visual displays, such as in the case of the laptop screen, but more generally to include the great variety and diversity of displays utilized in today's electrical and electronics components, such as in televisions, computer monitors, desktop monitors, laptop displays, digital photo frames, electronic books, mobile device displays (e.g. on phones, PDAs, games, navigation devices, DVD players), and the like. Displays that may be powered through one or more of the wireless power transmission systems described herein may also include embedded displays, such as embedded in electronic components (e.g. audio equipment, home appliances, automotive displays, entertainment devices, cash registers, remote controls), in furniture, in building infrastructure, in a vehicle, on the surface of an object (e.g. on the surface of a vehicle, building, clothing, signs, transportation), and the like. Displays may be very small with tiny resonant devices, such as in a smart card as described herein, or very large, such as in an advertisement sign. Displays powered using the principles disclosed herein may also be any one of a plurality of imaging technologies, such as liquid crystal display (LCD), thin film transistor LCD, passive LCD, cathode ray tube (CRT), plasma display, projector display (e.g. LCD, DLP, LCOS), surface-conduction electron-emitter display (SED), organic light-emitting diode (OLED), and the like. Source coil configurations may include attaching to a primary power source, such as building power, vehicle power, from a wireless extension cord as described herein, and the like; attached to component power, such as the base of an electrical component (e.g. the base of a computer, a cable box for a TV); an intermediate relay source coil; and the like. For example, hanging a digital display on the wall may be very appealing, such as in the case of a digital photo frame that receives its information signals wirelessly or through a portable memory device, but the need for an unsightly power cord may make it aesthetically unpleasant. However, with a device coil embedded in the digital photo frame, such as wrapped within the frame portion, may allow the digital photo frame to be hung with no wires at all. The source resonator may then be placed in the vicinity of the digital photo frame, such as in the next room on the other side of the wall, plugged directly into a traditional power outlet, from a wireless extension cord as described herein, from a central source resonator for the room, and the like.
The systems and methods described herein may provide wireless power transmission between different portions of an electronics facility. Continuing with the example of the laptop computer, and without limitation, the screen of the laptop computer may require power from the base of the laptop. In this instance, the electrical power has been traditionally routed via direct electrical connection from the base of the laptop to the screen over a hinged portion of the laptop between the screen and the base. When a wired connection is utilized, the wired connection may tend to wear out and break, the design functionality of the laptop computer may be limited by the required direct electrical connection, the design aesthetics of the laptop computer may be limited by the required direct electrical connection, and the like. However, a wireless connection may be made between the base and the screen. In this instance, the device resonator may be placed in the screen portion to power the display, and the base may be either powered by a second device resonator, by traditional wired connections, by a hybrid of resonator-battery-direct electrical connection, and the like. This may not only improve the reliability of the power connection due to the removal of the physical wired connection, but may also allow designers to improve the functional and/or aesthetic design of the hinge portion of the laptop in light of the absence of physical wires associated with the hinge. Again, the laptop computer has been used here to illustrate how the principles disclosed herein may improve the design of an electric or electronic device, and should not be taken as limiting in any way. For instance, many other electrical devices with separated physical portions could benefit from the systems and methods described herein, such as a refrigerator with electrical functions on the door, including an ice maker, a sensor system, a light, and the like; a robot with movable portions, separated by joints; a car's power system and a component in the car's door; and the like. The ability to provide power to a device via a device resonator from an external source resonator, or to a portion of the device via a device resonator from either external or internal source resonators, will be recognized by someone skilled in the art to be widely applicable across the range of electric and electronic devices.
The systems and methods disclosed herein may provide for a sharing of electrical power between devices, such as between charged devices and uncharged devices. For instance a charged up device or appliance may act like a source and send a predetermined amount of energy, dialed in amount of energy, requested and approved amount of energy, and the like, to a nearby device or appliance. For example, a user may have a cell phone and a digital camera that are both capable of transmitting and receiving power through embedded source and device resonators, and one of the devices, say the cell phone, is found to be low on charge. The user may then transfer charge from the digital camera to the cell phone. The source and device resonators in these devices may utilize the same physical resonator for both transmission and reception, utilize separate source and device resonators, one device may be designed to receive and transmit while the other is designed to receive only, one device may be designed to transmit only and the other to receive only, and the like.
To prevent complete draining the battery of a device it may have a setting allowing a user to specify how much of the power resource the receiving device is entitled to. It may be useful, for example, to put a limit on the amount of power available to external devices and to have the ability to shut down power transmission when battery power falls below a threshold.
The systems and methods described herein may provide wireless power transfer to a nearby electrical or electronics component in association with an electrical facility, where the source resonator is in the electrical facility and the device resonator is in the electronics component. The source resonator may also be connected to, plugged into, attached to the electrical facility, such as through a universal interface (e.g. a USB interface, PC card interface), supplemental electrical outlet, universal attachment point, and the like, of the electrical facility. For example, the source resonator may be inside the structure of a computer on a desk, or be integrated into some object, pad, and the like, that is connected to the computer, such as into one of the computer's USB interfaces. In the example of the source resonator embedded in the object, pad, and the like, and powered through a USB interface, the source resonator may then be easily added to a user's desktop without the need for being integrated into any other electronics device, thus conveniently providing a wireless energy zone around which a plurality of electric and/or electronics devices may be powered. The electrical facility may be a computer, a light fixture, a dedicated source resonator electrical facility, and the like, and the nearby components may be computer peripherals, surrounding electronics components, infrastructure devices, and the like, such as computer keyboards, computer mouse, fax machine, printer, speaker system, cell phone, audio device, intercom, music player, PDA, lights, electric pencil sharpener, fan, digital picture frame, calculator, electronic games, and the like. For example, a computer system may be the electrical facility with an integrated source resonator that utilizes a ‘wireless keyboard’ and ‘wireless mouse’, where the use of the term wireless here is meant to indicate that there is wireless communication facility between each device and the computer, and where each device must still contain a separate battery power source. As a result, batteries would need to be replaced periodically, and in a large company, may result in a substantial burden for support personnel for replacement of batteries, cost of batteries, and proper disposal of batteries. Alternatively, the systems and methods described herein may provide wireless power transmission from the main body of the computer to each of these peripheral devices, including not only power to the keyboard and mouse, but to other peripheral components such as a fax, printer, speaker system, and the like, as described herein. A source resonator integrated into the electrical facility may provide wireless power transmission to a plurality of peripheral devices, user devices, and the like, such that there is a significant reduction in the need to charge and/or replace batteries for devices in the near vicinity of the source resonator integrated electrical facility. The electrical facility may also provide tuning or auto-tuning software, algorithms, facilities, and the like, for adjusting the power transfer parameters between the electrical facility and the wirelessly powered device. For example, the electrical facility may be a computer on a user's desktop, and the source resonator may be either integrated into the computer or plugged into the computer (e.g. through a USB connection), where the computer provides a facility for providing the tuning algorithm (e.g. through a software program running on the computer).
The systems and methods disclosed herein may provide wireless power transfer to a nearby electrical or electronics component in association with a facility infrastructure component, where the source resonator is in, or mounted on, the facility infrastructure component and the device resonator is in the electronics component. For instance, the facility infrastructure component may be a piece of furniture, a fixed wall, a movable wall or partition, the ceiling, the floor, and the source resonator attached or integrated into a table or desk (e.g. just below/above the surface, on the side, integrated into a table top or table leg), a mat placed on the floor (e.g. below a desk, placed on a desk), a mat on the garage floor (e.g. to charge the car and/or devices in the car), in a parking lot/garage (e.g. on a post near where the car is parked), a television (e.g. for charging a remote control), a computer monitor (e.g. to power/charge a wireless keyboard, wireless mouse, cell phone), a chair (e.g. for powering electric blankets, medical devices, personal health monitors), a painting, office furniture, common household appliances, and the like. For example, the facility infrastructure component may be a lighting fixture in an office cubical, where the source resonator and light within the lighting fixture are both directly connected to the facility's wired electrical power. However, with the source resonator now provided in the lighting fixture, there would be no need to have any additional wired connections for those nearby electrical or electronics components that are connected to, or integrated with, a device resonator. In addition, there may be a reduced need for the replacement of batteries for devices with device resonators, as described herein.
The use of the systems and methods described herein to supply power to electrical and electronic devices from a central location, such as from a source resonator in an electrical facility, from a facility infrastructure component and the like, may minimize the electrical wiring infrastructure of the surrounding work area. For example, in an enterprise office space there are typically a great number of electrical and electronic devices that need to be powered by wired connections. With utilization of the systems and methods described herein, much of this wiring may be eliminated, saving the enterprise the cost of installation, decreasing the physical limitations associated with office walls having electrical wiring, minimizing the need for power outlets and power strips, and the like. The systems and methods described herein may save money for the enterprise through a reduction in electrical infrastructure associated with installation, re-installation (e.g., reconfiguring office space), maintenance, and the like. In another example, the principles disclosed herein may allow the wireless placement of an electrical outlet in the middle of a room. Here, the source could be placed on the ceiling of a basement below the location on the floor above where one desires to put an outlet. The device resonator could be placed on the floor of the room right above it. Installing a new lighting fixture (or any other electric device for that matter, e.g. camera, sensor, etc., in the center of the ceiling may now be substantially easier for the same reason).
In another example, the systems and methods described herein may provide power “through” walls. For instance, suppose one has an electric outlet in one room (e.g. on a wall), but one would like to have an outlet in the next room, but without the need to call an electrician, or drill through a wall, or drag a wire around the wall, or the like. Then one might put a source resonator on the wall in one room, and a device resonator outlet/pickup on the other side of the wall. This may power a flat-screen TV or stereo system or the like (e.g. one may not want to have an ugly wire climbing up the wall in the living room, but doesn't mind having a similar wire going up the wall in the next room, e.g. storage room or closet, or a room with furniture that blocks view of wires running along the wall). The systems and methods described herein may be used to transfer power from an indoor source to various electric devices outside of homes or buildings without requiring holes to be drilled through, or conduits installed in, these outside walls. In this case, devices could be wirelessly powered outside the building without the aesthetic or structural damage or risks associated with drilling holes through walls and siding. In addition, the systems and methods described herein may provide for a placement sensor to assist in placing an interior source resonator for an exterior device resonator equipped electrical component. For example, a home owner may place a security light on the outside of their home which includes a wireless device resonator, and now needs to adequately or optimally position the source resonator inside the home. A placement sensor acting between the source and device resonators may better enable that placement by indicating when placement is good, or to a degree of good, such as in a visual indication, an audio indication, a display indication, and the like. In another example, and in a similar way, the systems and methods described herein may provide for the installation of equipment on the roof of a home or building, such as radio transmitters and receivers, solar panels and the like. In the case of the solar panel, the source resonator may be associated with the panel, and power may be wirelessly transferred to a distribution panel inside the building without the need for drilling through the roof. The systems and methods described herein may allow for the mounting of electric or electrical components across the walls of vehicles (such as through the roof) without the need to drill holes, such as for automobiles, water craft, planes, trains, and the like. In this way, the vehicle's walls may be left intact without holes being drilled, thus maintaining the value of the vehicle, maintaining watertightness, eliminating the need to route wires, and the like. For example, mounting a siren or light to the roof of a police car decreases the future resale of the car, but with the systems and methods described herein, any light, horn, siren, and the like, may be attached to the roof without the need to drill a hole.
The systems and methods described herein may be used for wireless transfer of power from solar photovoltaic (PV) panels. PV panels with wireless power transfer capability may have several benefits including simpler installation, more flexible, reliable, and weatherproof design. Wireless power transfer may be used to transfer power from the PV panels to a device, house, vehicle, and the like. Solar PV panels may have a wireless source resonator allowing the PV panel to directly power a device that is enabled to receive the wireless power. For example, a solar PV panel may be mounted directly onto the roof of a vehicle, building, and the like. The energy captured by the PV panel may be wirelessly transferred directly to devices inside the vehicle or under the roof of a building. Devices that have resonators can wirelessly receive power from the PV panel. Wireless power transfer from PV panels may be used to transfer energy to a resonator that is coupled to the wired electrical system of a house, vehicle, and the like allowing traditional power distribution and powering of conventional devices without requiring any direct contact between the exterior PV panels and the internal electrical system.
With wireless power transfer significantly simpler installation of rooftop PV panels is possible because power may be transmitted wirelessly from the panel to a capture resonator in the house, eliminating all outside wiring, connectors, and conduits, and any holes through the roof or walls of the structure. Wireless power transfer used with solar cells may have a benefit in that it can reduced roof danger since it eliminates the need for electricians to work on the roof to interconnect panels, strings, and junction boxes. Installation of solar panels integrated with wireless power transfer may require less skilled labor since fewer electrical contacts need to be made. Less site specific design may be required with wireless power transfer since the technology gives the installer the ability to individually optimize and position each solar PV panel, significantly reducing the need for expensive engineering and panel layout services. There may not be need to carefully balance the solar load on every panel and no need for specialized DC wiring layout and interconnections.
For rooftop or on-wall installations of PV panels, the capture resonator may be mounted on the underside of the roof, inside the wall, or in any other easily accessible inside space within a foot or two of the solar PV panel. A diagram showing a possible general rooftop PV panel installation is shown in FIG. 51. Various PV solar collectors may be mounted in top of a roof with wireless power capture coils mounted inside the building under the roof. The resonator coils in the PV panels can transfer their energy wirelessly through the roof to the wireless capture coils. The captured energy from the PV cells may be collected and coupled to the electrical system of the house to power electric and electronic devices or coupled to the power grid when more power than needed is generated. Energy is captured from the PV cells without requiring holes or wires that penetrate the roof or the walls of the building. Each PV panel may have a resonator that is coupled to a corresponding resonator on the interior of the vehicle or building. Multiple panels may utilize wireless power transfer between each other to transfer or collect power to one or a couple of designated panels that are coupled to resonators on the interior of the vehicle of house. Panels may have wireless power resonators on their sides or in their perimeter that can couple to resonators located in other like panels allowing transfer of power from panel to panel. An additional bus or connection structure may be provided that wirelessly couples the power from multiple panels on the exterior of a building or vehicle and transfers power to one or a more resonators on the interior of building or vehicle.
For example, as shown in FIG. 51, a source resonator 5102 may be coupled to a PV cell 5100 mounted on top of roof 5104 of a building. A corresponding capture resonator 5106 is placed inside the building. The solar energy captured by the PV cells can then be transferred between the source resonators 5102 outside to the device resonators 5106 inside the building without having direct holes and connections through the building.
Each solar PV panel with wireless power transfer may have its own inverter, significantly improving the economics of these solar systems by individually optimizing the power production efficiency of each panel, supporting a mix of panel sizes and types in a single installation, including single panel “pay-as-you-grow” system expansions. Reduction of installation costs may make a single panel economical for installation. Eliminating the need for panel string designs and careful positioning and orienting of multiple panels, and eliminating a single point of failure for the system.
Wireless power transfer in PV solar panels may enable more solar deployment scenarios because the weather-sealed solar PV panels eliminate the need to drill holes for wiring through sealed surfaces such as car roofs and ship decks, and eliminate the requirement that the panels be installed in fixed locations. With wireless power transfer, PV panels may be deployed temporarily, and then moved or removed, without leaving behind permanent alterations to the surrounding structures. They may be placed out in a yard on sunny days, and moved around to follow the sun, or brought inside for cleaning or storage, for example. For backyard or mobile solar PV applications, an extension cord with a wireless energy capture device may be thrown on the ground or placed near the solar unit. The capture extension cord can be completely sealed from the elements and electrically isolated, so that it may be used in any indoor or outdoor environment.
With wireless power transfer no wires or external connections may be necessary and the PV solar panels can be completely weather sealed. Significantly improved reliability and lifetime of electrical components in the solar PV power generation and transmission circuitry can be expected since the weather-sealed enclosures can protect components from UV radiation, humidity, weather, and the like. With wireless power transfer and weather-sealed enclosures it may be possible to use less expensive components since they will no longer be directly exposed to external factors and weather elements and it may reduce the cost of PV panels.
Power transfer between the PV panels and the capture resonators inside a building or a vehicle may be bidirectional. Energy may be transmitted from the house grid to the PV panels to provide power when the panels do not have enough energy to perform certain tasks such. Reverse power flow can be used to melt snow from the panels, or power motors that will position the panels in a more favorable positions with respect to the sun energy. Once the snow is melted or the panels are repositioned and the PV panels can generate their own energy the direction of power transfer can be returned to normal delivering power from the PV panels to buildings, vehicles, or devices.
PV panels with wireless power transfer may include auto-tuning on installation to ensure maximum and efficient power transfer to the wireless collector. Variations in roofing materials or variations in distances between the PV panels and the wireless power collector in different installations may affect the performance or perturb the properties of the resonators of the wireless power transfer. To reduce the installation complexity the wireless power transfer components may include a tuning capability to automatically adjust their operating point to compensate for any effects due to materials or distance. Frequency, impedance, capacitance, inductance, duty cycle, voltage levels and the like may be adjusted to ensure efficient and safe power transfer
The systems and methods described herein may be used to provide a wireless power zone on a temporary basis or in extension of traditional electrical outlets to wireless power zones, such as through the use of a wireless power extension cord. For example, a wireless power extension cord may be configured as a plug for connecting into a traditional power outlet, a long wire such as in a traditional power extension cord, and a resonant source coil on the other end (e.g. in place of, or in addition to, the traditional socket end of the extension The wireless extension cord may also be configured where there are source resonators at a plurality of locations along the wireless extension cord. This configuration may then replace any traditional extension cord where there are wireless power configured devices, such as providing wireless power to a location where there is no convenient power outlet (e.g. a location in the living room where there's no outlet), for temporary wireless power where there is no wired power infrastructure (e.g. a construction site), out into the yard where there are no outlets (e.g. for parties or for yard grooming equipment that is wirelessly powered to decrease the chances of cutting the traditional electrical cord), and the like. The wireless extension cord may also be used as a drop within a wall or structure to provide wireless power zones within the vicinity of the drop. For example, a wireless extension cord could be run within a wall of a new or renovated room to provide wireless power zones without the need for the installation of traditional electrical wiring and outlets.
The systems and methods described herein may be utilized to provide power between moving parts or rotating assemblies of a vehicle, a robot, a mechanical device, a wind turbine, or any other type of rotating device or structure with moving parts such as robot arms, construction vehicles, movable platforms and the like. Traditionally, power in such systems may have been provided by slip rings or by rotary joints for example. Using wireless power transfer as described herein, the design simplicity, reliability and longevity of these devices may be significantly improved because power can be transferred over a range of distances without any physical connections or contact points that may wear down or out with time. In particular, the preferred coaxial and parallel alignment of the source and device coils may provide wireless power transmission that is not severely modulated by the relative rotational motion of the two coils.
The systems and methods described herein may be utilized to extend power needs beyond the reach of a single source resonator by providing a series of source-device-source-device resonators. For instance, suppose an existing detached garage has no electrical power and the owner now wants to install a new power service. However, the owner may not want to run wires all over the garage, or have to break into the walls to wire electrical outlets throughout the structure. In this instance, the owner may elect to connect a source resonator to the new power service, enabling wireless power to be supplied to device resonator outlets throughout the back of the garage. The owner may then install a device-source ‘relay’ to supply wireless power to device resonator outlets in the front of the garage. That is, the power relay may now receive wireless power from the primary source resonator, and then supply available power to a second source resonator to supply power to a second set of device resonators in the front of the garage. This configuration may be repeated again and again to extend the effective range of the supplied wireless power.
Multiple resonators may be used to extend power needs around an energy blocking material. For instance, it may be desirable to integrate a source resonator into a computer or computer monitor such that the resonator may power devices placed around and especially in front of the monitor or computer such as keyboards, computer mice, telephones, and the like. Due to aesthetics, space constraints, and the like an energy source that may be used for the source resonator may only be located or connected to in the back of the monitor or computer. In many designs of computer or monitors metal components and metal containing circuits are used in the design and packaging which may limit and prevent power transfer from source resonator in the back of the monitor or computer to the front of the monitor or computer. An additional repeater resonator may be integrated into the base or pedestal of the monitor or computer that couples to the source resonator in the back of the monitor or computer and allows power transfer to the space in front of the monitor or computer. The intermediate resonator integrated into the base or pedestal of the monitor or computer does not require an additional power source, it captures power from the source resonator and transfers power to the front around the blocking or power shielding metal components of the monitor or computer.
The systems and methods described herein may be built-into, placed on, hung from, embedded into, integrated into, and the like, the structural portions of a space, such as a vehicle, office, home, room, building, outdoor structure, road infrastructure, and the like. For instance, one or more sources may be built into, placed on, hung from, embedded or integrated into a wall, a ceiling or ceiling panel, a floor, a divider, a doorway, a stairwell, a compartment, a road surface, a sidewalk, a ramp, a fence, an exterior structure, and the like. One or more sources may be built into an entity within or around a structure, for instance a bed, a desk, a chair, a rug, a mirror, a clock, a display, a television, an electronic device, a counter, a table, a piece of furniture, a piece of artwork, an enclosure, a compartment, a ceiling panel, a floor or door panel, a dashboard, a trunk, a wheel well, a post, a beam, a support or any like entity. For example, a source resonator may be integrated into the dashboard of a user's car so that any device that is equipped with or connected to a device resonator may be supplied with power from the dashboard source resonator. In this way, devices brought into or integrated into the car may be constantly charged or powered while in the car.
The systems and methods described herein may provide power through the walls of vehicles, such as boats, cars, trucks, busses, trains, planes, satellites and the like. For instance, a user may not want to drill through the wall of the vehicle in order to provide power to an electric device on the outside of the vehicle. A source resonator may be placed inside the vehicle and a device resonator may be placed outside the vehicle (e.g. on the opposite side of a window, wall or structure). In this way the user may achieve greater flexibility in optimizing the placement, positioning and attachment of the external device to the vehicle, (such as without regard to supplying or routing electrical connections to the device). In addition, with the electrical power supplied wirelessly, the external device may be sealed such that it is water tight, making it safe if the electric device is exposed to weather (e.g. rain), or even submerged under water. Similar techniques may be employed in a variety of applications, such as in charging or powering hybrid vehicles, navigation and communications equipment, construction equipment, remote controlled or robotic equipment and the like, where electrical risks exist because of exposed conductors. The systems and methods described herein may provide power through the walls of vacuum chambers or other enclosed spaces such as those used in semiconductor growth and processing, material coating systems, aquariums, hazardous materials handling systems and the like. Power may be provided to translation stages, robotic arms, rotating stages, manipulation and collection devices, cleaning devices and the like.
The systems and methods described herein may provide wireless power to a kitchen environment, such as to counter-top appliances, including mixers, coffee makers, toasters, toaster ovens, grills, griddles, electric skillets, electric pots, electric woks, waffle makers, blenders, food processors, crock pots, warming trays, induction cooktops, lights, computers, displays, and the like. This technology may improve the mobility and/or positioning flexibility of devices, reduce the number of power cords stored on and strewn across the counter-top, improve the washability of the devices, and the like. For example, an electric skillet may traditionally have separate portions, such as one that is submersible for washing and one that is not submersible because it includes an external electrical connection (e.g. a cord or a socket for a removable cord). However, with a device resonator integrated into the unit, all electrical connections may be sealed, and so the entire device may now be submersed for cleaning. In addition, the absence of an external cord may eliminate the need for an available electrical wall outlet, and there is no longer a need for a power cord to be placed across the counter or for the location of the electric griddle to be limited to the location of an available electrical wall outlet.
The systems and methods described herein may provide continuous power/charging to devices equipped with a device resonator because the device doesn't leave the proximity of a source resonator, such as fixed electrical devices, personal computers, intercom systems, security systems, household robots, lighting, remote control units, televisions, cordless phones, and the like. For example, a household robot (e.g. ROOMBA) could be powered/charged via wireless power, and thus work arbitrarily long without recharging. In this way, the power supply design for the household robot may be changed to take advantage of this continuous source of wireless power, such as to design the robot to only use power from the source resonator without the need for batteries, use power from the source resonator to recharge the robot's batteries, use the power from the source resonator to trickle charge the robot's batteries, use the power from the source resonator to charge a capacitive energy storage unit, and the like. Similar optimizations of the power supplies and power circuits may be enabled, designed, and realized, for any and all of the devices disclosed herein.
The systems and methods described herein may be able to provide wireless power to electrically heated blankets, heating pads/patches, and the like. These electrically heated devices may find a variety of indoor and outdoor uses. For example, hand and foot warmers supplied to outdoor workers such as guards, policemen, construction workers and the like might be remotely powered from a source resonator associated with or built into a nearby vehicle, building, utility pole, traffic light, portable power unit, and the like.
The systems and methods described herein may be used to power a portable information device that contains a device resonator and that may be powered up when the information device is near an information source containing a source resonator. For instance, the information device may be a card (e.g. credit card, smart card, electronic card, and the like) carried in a user's pocket, wallet, purse, vehicle, bike, and the like. The portable information device may be powered up when it is in the vicinity of an information source that then transmits information to the portable information device that may contain electronic logic, electronic processors, memory, a display, an LCD display, LEDs, RFID tags, and the like. For example, the portable information device may be a credit card with a display that “turns on” when it is near an information source, and provide the user with some information such as, “You just received a coupon for 50% off your next Coca Cola purchase”. The information device may store information such as coupon or discount information that could be used on subsequent purchases. The portable information device may be programmed by the user to contain tasks, calendar appointments, to-do lists, alarms and reminders, and the like. The information device may receive up-to-date price information and inform the user of the location and price of previously selected or identified items.
The systems and methods described herein may provide wireless power transmission to directly power or recharge the batteries in sensors, such as environmental sensors, security sensors, agriculture sensors, appliance sensors, food spoilage sensors, power sensors, and the like, which may be mounted internal to a structure, external to a structure, buried underground, installed in walls, and the like. For example, this capability may replace the need to dig out old sensors to physically replace the battery, or to bury a new sensor because the old sensor is out of power and no longer operational. These sensors may be charged up periodically through the use of a portable sensor source resonator charging unit. For instance, a truck carrying a source resonator equipped power source, say providing  ̃kW of power, may provide enough power to a  ̃mW sensor in a few minutes to extend the duration of operation of the sensor for more than a year. Sensors may also be directly powered, such as powering sensors that are in places where it is difficult to connect to them with a wire but they are still within the vicinity of a source resonator, such as devices outside of a house (security camera), on the other side of a wall, on an electric lock on a door, and the like. In another example, sensors that may need to be otherwise supplied with a wired power connection may be powered through the systems and methods described herein. For example, a ground fault interrupter breaker combines residual current and over-current protection in one device for installation into a service panel. However, the sensor traditionally has to be independently wired for power, and this may complicate the installation. However, with the systems and methods described herein the sensor may be powered with a device resonator, where a single source resonator is provided within the service panel, thus simplifying the installation and wiring configuration within the service panel. In addition, the single source resonator may power device resonators mounted on either side of the source resonator mounted within the service panel, throughout the service panel, to additional nearby service panels, and the like. The systems and methods described herein may be employed to provide wireless power to any electrical component associated with electrical panels, electrical rooms, power distribution and the like, such as in electric switchboards, distribution boards, circuit breakers, transformers, backup batteries, fire alarm control panels, and the like. Through the use of the systems and methods described herein, it may be easier to install, maintain, and modify electrical distribution and protection components and system installations.
In another example, sensors that are powered by batteries may run continuously, without the need to change the batteries, because wireless power may be supplied to periodically or continuously recharge or trickle charge the battery. In such applications, even low levels of power may adequately recharge or maintain the charge in batteries, significantly extending their lifetime and usefulness. In some cases, the battery life may be extended to be longer than the lifetime of the device it is powering, making it essentially a battery that “lasts forever”.
The systems and methods described herein may be used for charging implanted medical device batteries, such as in an artificial heart, pacemaker, heart pump, insulin pump, implanted coils for nerve or acupressure/acupuncture point stimulation, and the like. For instance, it may not be convenient or safe to have wires sticking out of a patient because the wires may be a constant source of possible infection and may generally be very unpleasant for the patient. The systems and methods described herein may also be used to charge or power medical devices in or on a patient from an external source, such as from a bed or a hospital wall or ceiling with a source resonator. Such medical devices may be easier to attach, read, use and monitor the patient. The systems and methods described herein may ease the need for attaching wires to the patient and the patient's bed or bedside, making it more convenient for the patient to move around and get up out of bed without the risk of inadvertently disconnecting a medical device. This may, for example, be usefully employed with patients that have multiple sensors monitoring them, such as for measuring pulse, blood pressure, glucose, and the like. For medical and monitoring devices that utilize batteries, the batteries may need to be replaced quite often, perhaps multiple times a week. This may present risks associated with people forgetting to replace batteries, not noticing that the devices or monitors are not working because the batteries have died, infection associated with improper cleaning of the battery covers and compartments, and the like.
The systems and methods described herein may reduce the risk and complexity of medical device implantation procedures. Today many implantable medical devices such as ventricular assist devices, pacemakers, defibrillators and the like, require surgical implantation due to their device form factor, which is heavily influenced by the volume and shape of the long-life battery that is integrated in the device. In one aspect, there is described herein a non-invasive method of recharging the batteries so that the battery size may be dramatically reduced, and the entire device may be implanted, such as via a catheter. A catheter implantable device may include an integrated capture or device coil. A catheter implantable capture or device coil may be designed so that it may be wired internally, such as after implantation. The capture or device coil may be deployed via a catheter as a rolled up flexible coil (e.g. rolled up like two scrolls, easily unrolled internally with a simple spreader mechanism). The power source coil may be worn in a vest or article of clothing that is tailored to fit in such a way that places the source in proper position, may be placed in a chair cushion or bed cushion, may be integrated into a bed or piece of furniture, and the like.
The systems and methods described herein may enable patients to have a ‘sensor vest’, sensor patch, and the like, that may include at least one of a plurality of medical sensors and a device resonator that may be powered or charged when it is in the vicinity of a source resonator. Traditionally, this type of medical monitoring facility may have required batteries, thus making the vest, patch, and the like, heavy, and potentially impractical. But using the principles disclosed herein, no batteries (or a lighter rechargeable battery) may be required, thus making such a device more convenient and practical, especially in the case where such a medical device could be held in place without straps, such as by adhesive, in the absence of batteries or with substantially lighter batteries. A medical facility may be able to read the sensor data remotely with the aim of anticipating (e.g. a few minutes ahead of) a stroke, a heart-attack, or the like. When the vest is used by a person in a location remote from the medical facility, such as in their home, the vest may then be integrated with a cell-phone or communications device to call an ambulance in case of an accident or a medical event. The systems and methods described herein may be of particular value in the instance when the vest is to be used by an elderly person, where traditional non-wireless recharging practices (e.g. replacing batteries, plugging in at night, and the like) may not be followed as required. The systems and methods described herein may also be used for charging devices that are used by or that aid handicapped or disabled people who may have difficulty replacing or recharging batteries, or reliably supplying power to devices they enjoy or rely on.
The systems and methods described herein may be used for the charging and powering of artificial limbs. Artificial limbs have become very capable in terms of replacing the functionality of original limbs, such as arms, legs, hands and feet. However, an electrically powered artificial limb may require substantial power, (such as 10-20 W) which may translate into a substantial battery. In that case, the amputee may be left with a choice between a light battery that doesn't last very long, and a heavy battery that lasts much longer, but is more difficult to ‘carry’ around. The systems and methods described herein may enable the artificial limb to be powered with a device resonator, where the source resonator is either carried by the user and attached to a part of the body that may more easily support the weight (such as on a belt around the waist, for example) or located in an external location where the user will spend an adequate amount of time to keep the device charged or powered, such as at their desk, in their car, in their bed, and the like.
The systems and methods described herein may be used for charging and powering of electrically powered exo-skeletons, such as those used in industrial and military applications, and for elderly/weak/sick people. An electrically powered exo-skeleton may provide up to a 10-to-20 times increase in “strength” to a person, enabling the person to perform physically strenuous tasks repeatedly without much fatigue. However, exo-skeletons may require more than 100 W of power under certain use scenarios, so battery powered operation may be limited to 30 minutes or less. The delivery of wireless power as described herein may provide a user of an exo-skeleton with a continuous supply of power both for powering the structural movements of the exo-skeleton and for powering various monitors and sensors distributed throughout the structure. For instance, an exo-skeleton with an embedded device resonator(s) may be supplied with power from a local source resonator. For an industrial exo-skeleton, the source resonator may be placed in the walls of the facility. For a military exo-skeleton, the source resonator may be carried by an armored vehicle. For an exo-skeleton employed to assist a caretaker of the elderly, the source resonator(s) may be installed or placed in or the room(s) of a person's home.
The systems and methods described herein may be used for the powering/charging of portable medical equipment, such as oxygen systems, ventilators, defibrillators, medication pumps, monitors, and equipment in ambulances or mobile medical units, and the like. Being able to transport a patient from an accident scene to the hospital, or to move patients in their beds to other rooms or areas, and bring all the equipment that is attached with them and have it powered the whole time offers great benefits to the patients' health and eventual well-being. Certainly one can understand the risks and problems caused by medical devices that stop working because their battery dies or because they must be unplugged while a patient is transported or moved in any way. For example, an emergency medical team on the scene of an automotive accident might need to utilize portable medical equipment in the emergency care of patients in the field. Such portable medical equipment must be properly maintained so that there is sufficient battery life to power the equipment for the duration of the emergency. However, it is too often the case that the equipment is not properly maintained so that batteries are not fully charged and in some cases, necessary equipment is not available to the first responders. The systems and methods described herein may provide for wireless power to portable medical equipment (and associated sensor inputs on the patient) in such a way that the charging and maintaining of batteries and power packs is provided automatically and without human intervention. Such a system also benefits from the improved mobility of a patient unencumbered by a variety of power cords attached to the many medical monitors and devices used in their treatment.
The systems and methods described herein may be used to for the powering/charging of personal hearing aids. Personal hearing aids need to be small and light to fit into or around the ear of a person. The size and weight restrictions limit the size of batteries that can be used. Likewise, the size and weight restrictions of the device make battery replacement difficult due to the delicacy of the components. The dimensions of the devices and hygiene concerns make it difficult to integrate additional charging ports to allow recharging of the batteries. The systems and methods described herein may be integrated into the hearing aid and may reduce the size of the necessary batteries which may allow even smaller hearing aids. Using the principles disclosed herein, the batteries of the hearing aid may be recharged without requiring external connections or charging ports. Charging and device circuitry and a small rechargeable battery may be integrated into a form factor of a conventional hearing aid battery allowing retrofit into existing hearing aids. The hearing aid may be recharged while it is used and worn by a person. The energy source may be integrated into a pad or a cup allowing recharging when the hearing is placed on such a structure. The charging source may be integrated into a hearing aid dryer box allowing wireless recharging while the hearing aid is drying or being sterilized. The source and device resonator may be used to also heat the device reducing or eliminating the need for an additional heating element. Portable charging cases powered by batteries or AC adaptors may be used as storage and charging stations.
The source resonator for the medical systems described above may be in the main body of some or all of the medical equipment, with device resonators on the patient's sensors and devices; the source resonator may be in the ambulance with device resonators on the patient's sensors and the main body of some or all of the equipment; a primary source resonator may be in the ambulance for transferring wireless power to a device resonator on the medical equipment while the medical equipment is in the ambulance and a second source resonator is in the main body of the medical equipment and a second device resonator on the patient sensors when the equipment is away from the ambulance; and the like. The systems and methods described herein may significantly improve the ease with which medical personnel are able to transport patients from one location to another, where power wires and the need to replace or manually charge associated batteries may now be reduced.
The systems and methods described herein may be used for the charging of devices inside a military vehicle or facility, such as a tank, armored carrier, mobile shelter, and the like. For instance, when soldiers come back into a vehicle after “action” or a mission, they may typically start charging their electronic devices. If their electronic devices were equipped with device resonators, and there was a source resonator inside the vehicle, (e.g. integrated in the seats or on the ceiling of the vehicle), their devices would start charging immediately. In fact, the same vehicle could provide power to soldiers/robots (e.g. packbot from iRobot) standing outside or walking beside the vehicle. This capability may be useful in minimizing accidental battery-swapping with someone else (this may be a significant issue, as soldiers tend to trust only their own batteries); in enabling quicker exits from a vehicle under attack; in powering or charging laptops or other electronic devices inside a tank, as too many wires inside the tank may present a hazard in terms of reduced ability to move around fast in case of “trouble” and/or decreased visibility; and the like. The systems and methods described herein may provide a significant improvement in association with powering portable power equipment in a military environment.
The systems and methods described herein may provide wireless powering or charging capabilities to mobile vehicles such as golf carts or other types of carts, all-terrain vehicles, electric bikes, scooters, cars, mowers, bobcats and other vehicles typically used for construction and landscaping and the like. The systems and methods described herein may provide wireless powering or charging capabilities to miniature mobile vehicles, such as mini-helicopters, airborne drones, remote control planes, remote control boats, remote controlled or robotic rovers, remote controlled or robotic lawn mowers or equipment, bomb detection robots, and the like. For instance, mini-helicopter flying above a military vehicle to increase its field of view can fly for a few minutes on standard batteries. If these mini-helicopters were fitted with a device resonator, and the control vehicle had a source resonator, the mini-helicopter might be able to fly indefinitely. The systems and methods described herein may provide an effective alternative to recharging or replacing the batteries for use in miniature mobile vehicles. In addition, the systems and methods described herein may provide power/charging to even smaller devices, such as microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), nano-robots, nano devices, and the like. In addition, the systems and methods described herein may be implemented by installing a source device in a mobile vehicle or flying device to enable it to serve as an in-field or in-flight re-charger, that may position itself autonomously in proximity to a mobile vehicle that is equipped with a device resonator.
The systems and methods described herein may be used to provide power networks for temporary facilities, such as military camps, oil drilling setups, remote filming locations, and the like, where electrical power is required, such as for power generators, and where power cables are typically run around the temporary facility. There are many instances when it is necessary to set up temporary facilities that require power. The systems and methods described herein may enable a more efficient way to rapidly set up and tear down these facilities, and may reduce the number of wires that must be run throughout the faculties to supply power. For instance, when Special Forces move into an area, they may erect tents and drag many wires around the camp to provide the required electricity. Instead, the systems and methods described herein may enable an army vehicle, outfitted with a power supply and a source resonator, to park in the center of the camp, and provide all the power to nearby tents where the device resonator may be integrated into the tents, or some other piece of equipment associated with each tent or area. A series of source-device-source-device resonators may be used to extend the power to tents that are farther away. That is, the tents closest to the vehicle could then provide power to tents behind them. The systems and methods described herein may provide a significant improvement to the efficiency with which temporary installations may be set up and torn down, thus improving the mobility of the associated facility.
The systems and methods described herein may be used in vehicles, such as for replacing wires, installing new equipment, powering devices brought into the vehicle, charging the battery of a vehicle (e.g. for a traditional gas powered engine, for a hybrid car, for an electric car, and the like), powering devices mounted to the interior or exterior of the vehicle, powering devices in the vicinity of the vehicle, and the like. For example, the systems and methods described herein may be used to replace wires such as those are used to power lights, fans and sensors distributed throughout a vehicle. As an example, a typical car may have 50 kg of wires associated with it, and the use of the systems and methods described herein may enable the elimination of a substantial amount of this wiring. The performance of larger and more weight sensitive vehicles such as airplanes or satellites could benefit greatly from having the number of cables that must be run throughout the vehicle reduced. The systems and methods described herein may allow the accommodation of removable or supplemental portions of a vehicle with electric and electrical devices without the need for electrical harnessing. For example, a motorcycle may have removable side boxes that act as a temporary trunk space for when the cyclist is going on a long trip. These side boxes may have exterior lights, interior lights, sensors, auto equipment, and the like, and if not for being equipped with the systems and methods described herein might require electrical connections and harnessing.
An in-vehicle wireless power transmission system may charge or power one or more mobile devices used in a car: mobile phone handset, Bluetooth headset, blue tooth hands free speaker phone, GPS, MP3 player, wireless audio transceiver for streaming MP3 audio through car stereo via FM, Bluetooth, and the like. The in vehicle wireless power source may utilize source resonators that are arranged in any of several possible configurations including charging pad on dash, charging pad otherwise mounted on floor, or between seat and center console, charging “cup” or receptacle that fits in cup holder or on dash, and the like.
The wireless power transmission source may utilize a rechargeable battery system such that said supply battery gets charged whenever the vehicle power is on such that when the vehicle is turned off the wireless supply can draw power from the supply battery and can continue to wirelessly charge or power mobile devices that are still in the car.
The plug-in electric cars, hybrid cars, and the like, of the future need to be charged, and the user may need to plug in to an electrical supply when they get home or to a charging station. Based on a single over-night recharging, the user may be able to drive up to 50 miles the next day. Therefore, in the instance of a hybrid car, if a person drives less than 50 miles on most days, they will be driving mostly on electricity. However, it would be beneficial if they didn't have to remember to plug in the car at night. That is, it would be nice to simply drive into a garage, and have the car take care of its own charging. To this end, a source resonator may be built into the garage floor and/or garage side-wall, and the device resonator may be built into the bottom (or side) of the car. Even a few kW transfer may be sufficient to recharge the car over-night. The in-vehicle device resonator may measure magnetic field properties to provide feedback to assist in vehicle (or any similar device) alignment to a stationary resonating source. The vehicle may use this positional feedback to automatically position itself to achieve optimum alignment, thus optimum power transmission efficiency. Another method may be to use the positional feedback to help the human operator to properly position the vehicle or device, such as by making LED's light up, providing noises, and the like when it is well positioned. In such cases where the amount of power being transmitted could present a safety hazard to a person or animal that intrudes into the active field volume, the source or receiver device may be equipped with an active light curtain or some other external device capable of sensing intrusion into the active field volume, and capable of shutting off the source device and alert a human operator. In addition, the source device may be equipped with self-sensing capability such that it may detect that its expected power transmission rate has been interrupted by an intruding element, and in such case shut off the source device and alert a human operator. Physical or mechanical structures such as hinged doors or inflatable bladder shields may be incorporated as a physical barrier to prevent unwanted intrusions. Sensors such as optical, magnetic, capacitive, inductive, and the like may also be used to detect foreign structures or interference between the source and device resonators. The shape of the source resonator may be shaped such to prevent water or debris accumulation. The source resonator may be placed in a cone shaped enclosure or may have an enclosure with an angled top to allow water and debris to roll off. The source of the system may use battery power of the vehicle or its own battery power to transmit its presence to the source to initiate power transmission.
The source resonator may be mounted on an embedded or hanging post, on a wall, on a stand, and the like for coupling to a device resonator mounted on the bumper, hood, body panel, and the like, of an electric vehicle. The source resonator may be enclosed or embedded into a flexible enclosure such as a pillow, a pad, a bellows, a spring loaded enclosure and the like so that the electric vehicle may make contact with the structure containing the source coil without damaging the car in any way. The structure containing the source may prevent objects from getting between the source and device resonators. Because the wireless power transfer may be relatively insensitive to misalignments between the source and device coils, a variety of flexible source structures and parking procedures may be appropriate for this application.
The systems and methods described herein may be used to trickle charge batteries of electric, hybrid or combustion engine vehicles. Vehicles may require small amounts of power to maintain or replenish battery power. The power may be transferred wirelessly from a source to a device resonator that may be incorporated into the front grill, roof, bottom, or other parts of the vehicle. The device resonator may be designed to fit into a shape of a logo on the front of a vehicle or around the grill as not to obstruct air flow through the radiator. The device or source resonator may have additional modes of operation that allow the resonator to be used as a heating element which can be used to melt of snow or ice from the vehicle.
An electric vehicle or hybrid vehicle may require multiple device resonators, such as to increase the ease with which the vehicle may come in proximity with a source resonator for charging (i.e. the greater the number and varied position of device resonators are, the greater the chances that the vehicle can pull in and interface with a diversity of charging stations), to increase the amount of power that can be delivered in a period of time (e.g. additional device resonators may be required to keep the local heating due to charging currents to acceptable levels), to aid in automatic parking/docking the vehicle with the charging station, and the like. For example, the vehicle may have multiple resonators (or a single resonator) with a feedback system that provides guidance to either the driver or an automated parking/docking facility in the parking of the vehicle for optimized charging conditions (i.e., the optimum positioning of the vehicle's device resonator to the charging station's source resonator may provide greater power transfer efficiency). An automated parking/docking facility may allow for the automatic parking of the vehicle based on how well the vehicle is coupled.
The power transmission system may be used to power devices and peripherals of a vehicle. Power to peripherals may be provided while a vehicle is charging, or while not charging, or power may be delivered to conventional vehicles that do not need charging. For example, power may be transferred wirelessly to conventional non-electric cars to power air conditioning, refrigeration units, heaters, lights, and the like while parked to avoid running the engine which may be important to avoid exhaust build up in garage parking lots or loading docks. Power may for example be wirelessly transferred to a bus while it is parked to allow powering of lights, peripherals, passenger devices, and the like avoiding the use of onboard engines or power sources. Power may be wirelessly transferred to an airplane while parked on the tarmac or in a hanger to power instrumentation, climate control, de-icing equipment, and the like without having to use onboard engines or power sources.
Wireless power transmission on vehicles may be used to enable the concept of Vehicle to Grid (V2G). Vehicle to grid is based on utilizing electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) as distributed energy storage devices, charged at night when the electric grid is underutilized, and available to discharge back into the grid during episodes of peak demand that occur during the day. The wireless power transmission system on a vehicle and the respective infrastructure may be implemented in such a way as to enable bidirectional energy flow—so that energy can flow back into the grid from the vehicle—without requiring a plug in connection. Vast fleets of vehicles, parked at factories, offices, parking lots, can be viewed as “peaking power capacity” by the smart grid. Wireless power transmission on vehicles can make such a V2G vision a reality. By simplifying the process of connecting a vehicle to the grid, (i.e. by simply parking it in a wireless charging enabled parking spot), it becomes much more likely that a certain number of vehicles will be “dispatchable” when the grid needs to tap their power. Without wireless charging, electric and PHEV owners will likely charge their vehicles at home, and park them at work in conventional parking spots. Who will want to plug their vehicle in at work, if they do not need charging? With wireless charging systems capable of handling 3 kW, 100,000 vehicles can provide 300 Megawatts back to the grid—using energy generated the night before by cost effective base load generating capacity. It is the streamlined ergonomics of the cordless self charging PHEV and electric vehicles that make it a viable V2G energy source.
The systems and methods described herein may be used to power sensors on the vehicle, such as sensors in tires to measure air-pressure, or to run peripheral devices in the vehicle, such as cell phones, GPS devices, navigation devices, game players, audio or video players, DVD players, wireless routers, communications equipment, anti-theft devices, radar devices, and the like. For example, source resonators described herein may be built into the main compartment of the car in order to supply power to a variety of devices located both inside and outside of the main compartment of the car. Where the vehicle is a motorcycle or the like, devices described herein may be integrated into the body of the motorcycle, such as under the seat, and device resonators may be provided in a user's helmet, such as for communications, entertainment, signaling, and the like, or device resonators may be provided in the user's jacket, such as for displaying signals to other drivers for safety, and the like.
The systems and methods described herein may be used in conjunction with transportation infrastructure, such as roads, trains, planes, shipping, and the like. For example, source resonators may be built into roads, parking lots, rail-lines, and the like. Source resonators may be built into traffic lights, signs, and the like. For example, with source resonators embedded into a road, and device resonators built into vehicles, the vehicles may be provided power as they drive along the road or as they are parked in lots or on the side of the road. The systems and methods described herein may provide an effective way for electrical systems in vehicles to be powered and/or charged while the vehicle traverses a road network, or a portion of a road network. In this way, the systems and methods described herein may contribute to the powering/charging of autonomous vehicles, automatic guided vehicles, and the like. The systems and methods described herein may provide power to vehicles in places where they typically idle or stop, such as in the vicinity of traffic lights or signs, on highway ramps, or in parking lots.
The systems and methods described herein may be used in an industrial environment, such as inside a factory for powering machinery, powering/charging robots, powering and/or charging wireless sensors on robot arms, powering/charging tools and the like. For example, using the systems and methods described herein to supply power to devices on the arms of robots may help eliminate direct wire connections across the joints of the robot arm. In this way, the wearing out of such direct wire connections may be reduced, and the reliability of the robot increased. In this case, the device resonator may be out on the arm of the robot, and the source resonator may be at the base of the robot, in a central location near the robot, integrated into the industrial facility in which the robot is providing service, and the like. The use of the systems and methods described herein may help eliminate wiring otherwise associated with power distribution within the industrial facility, and thus benefit the overall reliability of the facility.
The systems and methods described herein may be used for underground applications, such as drilling, mining, digging, and the like. For example, electrical components and sensors associated with drilling or excavation may utilize the systems and methods described herein to eliminate cabling associated with a digging mechanism, a drilling bit, and the like, thus eliminating or minimizing cabling near the excavation point. In another example, the systems and methods described herein may be used to provide power to excavation equipment in a mining application where the power requirements for the equipment may be high and the distances large, but where there are no people to be subjected to the associated required fields. For instance, the excavation area may have device resonator powered digging equipment that has high power requirements and may be digging relatively far from the source resonator. As a result the source resonator may need to provide high field intensities to satisfy these requirements, but personnel are far enough away to be outside these high intensity fields. This high power, no personnel, scenario may be applicable to a plurality of industrial applications.
The systems and methods described herein may also use the near-field non-radiative resonant scheme for information transfer rather than, or in addition to, power transfer. For instance, information being transferred by near-field non-radiative resonance techniques may not be susceptible to eavesdropping and so may provide an increased level of security compared to traditional wireless communication schemes. In addition, information being transferred by near-field non-radiative resonance techniques may not interfere with the EM radiative spectrum and so may not be a source of EM interference, thereby allowing communications in an extended frequency range and well within the limits set by any regulatory bodies. Communication services may be provided between remote, inaccessible or hard-to-reach places such as between remote sensors, between sections of a device or vehicle, in tunnels, caves and wells (e.g. oil wells, other drill sites) and between underwater or underground devices, and the like. Communications services may be provided in places where magnetic fields experience less loss than electric fields.
The systems and methods described herein may enable the simultaneous transmission of power and communication signals between sources and devices in wireless power transmission systems, or it may enable the transmission of power and communication signals during different time periods or at different frequencies. The performance characteristics of the resonator may be controllably varied to preferentially support or limit the efficiency or range of either energy or information transfer. The performance characteristics of the resonators may be controlled to improve the security by reducing the range of information transfer, for example. The performance characteristics of the resonators may be varied continuously, periodically, or according to a predetermined, computed or automatically adjusted algorithm. For example, the power and information transfer enabled by the systems and methods described herein may be provided in a time multiplexed or frequency multiplexed manner. A source and device may signal each other by tuning, changing, varying, dithering, and the like, the resonator impedance which may affect the reflected impedance of other resonators that can be detected. The information transferred as described herein may include information regarding device identification, device power requirements, handshaking protocols, and the like.
The source and device may sense, transmit, process and utilize position and location information on any other sources and/or devices in a power network. The source and device may capture or use information such as elevation, tilt, latitude and longitude, and the like from a variety of sensors and sources that may be built into the source and device or may be part of a component the source or device connect. The positioning and orientation information may include sources such as global positioning sensors (GPS), compasses, accelerometers, pressure sensors, atmospheric barometric sensors, positioning systems which use Wi-Fi or cellular network signals, and the like. The source and device may use the position and location information to find nearby wireless power transmission sources. A source may broadcast or communicate with a central station or database identifying its location. A device may obtain the source location information from the central station or database or from the local broadcast and guide a user or an operator to the source with the aid of visual, vibrational, or auditory signals. Sources and devices may be nodes in a power network, in a communications network, in a sensor network, in a navigational network, and the like or in kind of combined functionality network.
The position and location information may also be used to optimize or coordinate power delivery. Additional information about the relative position of a source and a device may be used to optimize magnetic field direction and resonator alignment. The orientation of a device and a source which may be obtained from accelerometers and magnetic sensors, and the like, for example, may be used to identify the orientation of resonators and the most favorable direction of a magnetic field such that the magnetic flux is not blocked by the device circuitry. With such information a source with the most favorable orientation, or a combination of sources, may be used. Likewise, position and orientation information may be used to move or provide feedback to a user or operator of a device to place a device in a favorable orientation or location to maximize power transmission efficiency, minimize losses, and the like.
The source and device may include power metering and measuring circuitry and capability. The power metering may be used to track how much power was delivered to a device or how much power was transferred by a source. The power metering and power usage information may be used in fee based power delivery arrangements for billing purposes. Power metering may be also be used to enable power delivery policies to ensure power is distributed to multiple devices according to specific criteria. For example, the power metering may be used to categorize devices based on the amount of power they received and priority in power delivery may be given to those having received the least power. Power metering may be used to provide tiered delivery services such as “guaranteed power” and “best effort power” which may be billed at separate rates. Power metering may be used to institute and enforce hierarchical power delivery structures and may enable priority devices to demand and receive-more power under certain circumstances or use scenarios.
Power metering may be used to optimize power delivery efficiency and minimize absorption and radiation losses. Information related to the power received by devices may be used by a source in conjunction with information about the power output of the source to identify unfavorable operating environments or frequencies. For example, a source may compare the amount of power which was received by the devices and the amount of power which it transmitted to determine if the transmission losses may be unusually or unacceptably large. Large transmission losses may be due to an unauthorized device receiving power from the source and the source and other devices may initiate frequency hopping of the resonance frequency or other defensive measures to prevent or deter unauthorized use. Large transmission losses may be due to absorption losses for example, and the device and source may tune to alternate resonance frequencies to minimize such losses. Large transmission losses may also indicate the presence of unwanted or unknown objects or materials and the source may turn down or off its power level until the unwanted or unknown object is removed or identified, at which point the source may resume powering remote devices.
The source and device may include authentication capability. Authentication may be used to ensure that only compatible sources and devices are able to transmit and receive power. Authentication may be used to ensure that only authentic devices that are of a specific manufacturer and not clones or devices and sources from other manufacturers, or only devices that are part of a specific subscription or plan, are able to receive power from a source. Authentication may be based on cryptographic request and respond protocols or it may be based on the unique signatures of perturbations of specific devices allowing them to be used and authenticated based on properties similar to physically unclonable functions. Authentication may be performed locally between each source and device with local communication or it may be used with third person authentication methods where the source and device authenticate with communications to a central authority. Authentication protocols may use position information to alert a local source or sources of a genuine device.
The source and device may use frequency hopping techniques to prevent unauthorized use of a wireless power source. The source may continuously adjust or change the resonant frequency of power delivery. The changes in frequency may be performed in a pseudorandom or predetermined manner that is known, reproducible, or communicated to authorized device but difficult to predict. The rate of frequency hopping and the number of various frequencies used may be large and frequent enough to ensure that unauthorized use is difficult or impractical. Frequency hopping may be implemented by tuning the impedance network, tuning any of the driving circuits, using a plurality of resonators tuned or tunable to multiple resonant frequencies, and the like.
The source may have a user notification capability to show the status of the source as to whether it is coupled to a device resonator and transmitting power, if it is in standby mode, or if the source resonator is detuned or perturbed by an external object. The notification capability may include visual, auditory, and vibrational methods. The notification may be as simple as three color lights, one for each state, and optionally a speaker to provide notification in case of an error in operation. Alternatively, the notification capability may involve an interactive display that shows the status of the source and optionally provides instructions on how to fix or solve any errors or problems identified.
As another example, wireless power transfer may be used to improve the safety of electronic explosive detonators. Explosive devices are detonated with an electronic detonator, electric detonator, or shock tube detonator. The electronic detonator utilizes stored electrical energy (usually in a capacitor) to activate the igniter charge, with a low energy trigger signal transmitted conductively or by radio. The electric detonator utilizes a high energy conductive trigger signal to provide both the signal and the energy required to activate the igniter charge. A shock tube sends a controlled explosion through a hollow tube coated with explosive from the generator to the igniter charge. There are safety issues associated with the electric and electronic detonators, as there are cases of stray electromagnetic energy causing unintended activation. Wireless power transfer via sharply resonant magnetic coupling can improve the safety of such systems.
Using the wireless power transfer methods disclosed herein, one can build an electronic detonation system that has no locally stored energy, thus reducing the risk of unintended activation. A wireless power source can be placed in proximity (within a few meters) of the detonator. The detonator can be equipped with a resonant capture coil. The activation energy can be transferred when the wireless power source has been triggered. The triggering of the wireless power source can be initiated by any number of mechanisms: radio, magnetic near field radio, conductive signaling, ultrasonics, laser light. Wireless power transfer based on resonant magnetic coupling also has the benefit of being able to transfer power through materials such as rock, soil, concrete, water, and other dense materials. The use of very high Q coils as receivers and sources, having very narrow band response and sharply tuned to proprietary frequencies, further ensure that the detonator circuits cannot capture stray EMI and activate unintentionally.
The resonator of a wirelessly powered device may be external, or outside of the device, and wired to the battery of the device. The battery of the device may be modified to include appropriate rectification and control circuitry to receive the alternating currents of the device resonator. This can enable configurations with larger external coils, such as might be built into a battery door of a keyboard or mouse, or digital still camera, or even larger coils that are attached to the device but wired back to the battery/converter with ribbon cable. The battery door can be modified to provide interconnection from the external coil to the battery/converter (which will need an exposed contact that can touch the battery door contacts.
Stranded Printed Circuit Board Traces
As described in previous sections, high-Q inductive elements in magnetic resonators may be formed from litz wire conductors. Litz wires are bundles of thinner, insulated wires woven together in specially designed patterns so that the thinner individual wires do not occupy the same radial position within the larger bundle over any significant length. The weave pattern and the use of multiple smaller diameter wires effectively increases the skin depth and decreases the AC resistance of the wire over a range of frequencies.
High-Q inductive elements in magnetic resonators may also be formed from printed circuit board (PCB) traces. Printed circuit board traces may have a variety of attractive features including accurate reproducibility, easy integration, and cost effective mass-production. In this section, we disclose low AC resistance stranded PCB traces, comprising multiple narrower insulated traces, potentially distributed over multiple board layers, that do not maintain fixed positions within the weave pattern, and that may be fabricated using standard fabrication techniques. The AC resistance of these stranded traces may be determined by the number, the size, and the relative spacing of the narrower individual traces in the designed weave pattern, as well as by the number of board layers on which the weave patterns are printed and interconnected. Individual trace insulation may be provided by air, by circuit board materials, by coatings, by flexible sheets, by cured materials, and the like.
In embodiments, stranded trace weave patterns for PCB fabrication may be designed to be easily reproducible and scalable, as well as to achieve high individual trace densities. The achievable trace density may be determined by the narrowness of the individual traces, by the geometry of the weave pattern, and by the need to incorporate other, potentially larger structures or features, such as “vias” for example, in the weave pattern. In embodiments, methods and designs that place all the vias or through-holes used to connect individual traces between multiple layers of a PCB may be preferably placed on the outer perimeters of the multi-trace weave pattern. The outer location of the vias enables easy scaling and replication of the pattern as well as tight and uniform individual trace placement and density since the normally larger feature sized vias are not used within the weave pattern itself, potentially disrupting the uniformity of the pattern and the density of the weave.
As used in the description of this section, the term ‘stranded trace’ means a conductor formed from a group of multiple smaller or narrower individual traces, trace segments, or wires. In this section we describe techniques for routing individual traces on a multilayer PCB to form stranded traces that have a lower AC resistance than a solid conductor trace of equivalent size would have.
The braiding of the individual traces on the layered PCB board may be accomplished by routing each individual trace of a stranded trace in a specific pattern such that it undulates across and through the various layers of the PCB. The weave pattern of the individual traces may be designed so that all the individual traces in a stranded trace have substantially the same impedance. That is, an alternating current applied to the stranded trace will flow in substantially equal amounts in each of the individual traces. Because the current may be distributed uniformly across the strands, the AC resistance may be reduced. Note that the stranded conductor may be optimally designed for minimized resistance for specific AC frequencies. In embodiments, system trade-offs such as number and size of individual traces, numbers of layers of the PCB, connection complexities, board space, and the like, may be considered to determine the optimum weave pattern and design.
In this section we may discuss examples which utilize a layered PCB board with a specific number of layers. The specific number of layers in an example is used to clarify the methods and designs and should not be considered as limiting. The methods and designs can be extended and scaled to PCBs with more or fewer layers.
In this section we may discuss and describe examples which refer to specific layered PCB technologies or implementations. All of the techniques, methods, algorithms, and implementations described herein may be generic and may be applicable to a wide range of layered printed circuit board technologies and implementations including flex circuit boards and the like.
The method of routing individual traces to form a stranded trace comprises routing individual traces or segments of traces on different layers of a PCB and varying the relative location of each individual trace or segment within the resulting stranded trace. Each individual trace of a stranded trace may alter its position on each PCB layer, or the individual trace may alternate between two or more positions within a pattern on different PCB layers. It may be preferable that each individual trace of a stranded trace undulate through all the various layers of the layered PCB.
In layered PCB technologies, traces may be routed through to different conductor or PCB layers with vias or through-holes. The dimensions of the vias may be larger than the possible minimum dimensions of the individual traces, the minimum spacing between individual traces, or the skin depth of AC currents at the frequencies of interest. In embodiments, the designed weave patterns and routing methods may be realized by placing the vias on the outside edges or the exterior of the stranded traces or weave patterns. In embodiments, it may be possible to pack the individual traces as closely as feasible given the fabrication constraints on the individual traces and trace spacing and still achieve AC resistance values suitable for high-Q inductive elements.
The methods and designs for forming stranded traces on a PCB may comprise a specific routing of individual conductor traces on each layer and specific routing between each layer of the PCB.
The routing methods and designs may be illustrated and described with an example shown in FIG. 52A and FIG. 52B which demonstrates some of the main characteristics of the methods and designs. FIG. 52A and FIG. 52B depict an exemplary weave pattern for individual traces that may be formed on each layer of a four layer printed circuit board. Connecting the individual traces across the four layers of the board may form a stranded trace comprising seven individual traces. These seven individual traces may be arranged in the pattern shown and may be repeated to the desired length of the stranded trace. The individual traces on each layer are depicted by the black lines in FIG. 52A and the vias are represented by the black dots on either side of the traces. FIG. 52A depicts the individual layers of conductors side by side for clarity. In a PCB, the four layers are stacked, one on top of the other, and separated by the insulator layers of the PCB. The vias on the sides of the stranded conductor may be shared through (or across) all of the layers. For this exemplary embodiment, the first bottom via 5201 in FIG. 52A is the same via when the layers are stacked on top of one another. The two numbers next to each via represent the layers with individual traces that are connected by that via. For example, the first bottom via 5201, which is labeled as 4-1 connects the individual trace segments on the fourth conducting layer and the first conducting layer that are connected to that via.
FIG. 52B shows an isometric three dimensional view of the pattern from FIG. 52A. Individual traces on each layer are depicted with black lines and the connections made by the vias between the layers are depicted with dashed and dotted lines. The four layers of patterns in this example are stacked on top one another. The spacing and scale of the layers, as well as the separation between individual traces on each layer have been exaggerated to improve the clarity of the figure. The vias connect individual trace segments between two layers. In this example, all individual trace segments from each layer traverse the width of the stranded trace and are routed with the vias to an adjacent layer.
A stranded trace may be flanked by rows of vias on both sides of the weave pattern. On each PCB layer, the individual traces may traverse the width of the effective stranded trace. Each individual trace segment may be routed from a via on one side of the stranded trace to a via on the other side of the stranded trace. On each PCB layer, each routed individual trace may be routed from a via that connects that individual trace to an individual trace on another PCB layer. The individual traces may be routed in a manner such that they traverse the width of the effective stranded trace and also traverse a distance with respect to the axis of the stranded trace. The axis of the stranded trace is the virtual line that runs along the length of the stranded trace and is parallel to the rows of vias that flank the stranded trace. The axis of an exemplary stranded trace is illustrated in FIG. 52A with an arrow 5203.
In embodiments, each individual trace may be routed in effectively a substantially diagonal direction with respect to the axis of the stranded trace. In each conducting layer of the PCB, the individual traces may be routed in substantially the same direction. In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 52A and FIG. 52B, all the individual traces of Layer 1 may be routed in a substantially diagonal direction from the vias on one side of the stranded trace to the vias on the other side. At the vias, the individual traces may be routed to another layer of the PCB. All of the individual traces from a layer may be routed to another layer, with a similar, different, translated, reversed and the like, weave pattern at the vias. On the next layer, the individual traces may again be routed, for example, in a substantially diagonal pattern, from the vias on one side of the stranded trace to the vias on the other side of the stranded trace and so on to other layers. This pattern may continue until the individual traces have traversed all or some of the conducting layers of the PCB, whereupon the individual traces may return to the starting conducing layer or an intermediate conducting layer. The individual traces may undulate in such a manner for any number of cycles, depending on the weave pattern, the number of conducting layers in the PCB, the desired length of the stranded trace, and the like. In embodiments, the end points of the stranded traces may be designed to reside of the top and/or bottom layers of the PCBs so they are accessible for easy connection to other circuit elements or conductors.
In embodiments, on each sequential conductor layer, individual traces may be routed in a substantially diagonal direction with respect to the axis of the stranded trace. In embodiments, on each subsequent conductor layer, individual conductor traces may be routed in a substantially orthogonal direction to that of the previous conductor layer. This pattern can be seen in FIG. 52A and FIG. 52B. The individual traces in Layer 1 are routed in a substantially diagonal direction traversing the stranded trace from left to right in the Figure. In the subsequent layer, Layer 2, the individual traces are routed in a substantially diagonal direction that is substantially orthogonal to the conductor traces of Layer 1, and are routed from right to left of the stranded trace.
The routing or path of one individual conductor trace through the various conductor layers may be more easily distinguishable in FIG. 53A, where the path of one of the individual traces is highlighted by a dotted black line. Starting with the bottom via 5201, that connects Layer 4 and Layer 1, the individual trace is routed from the left side of the stranded trace to a via on the right side that connects Layer 1 and Layer 2. In this exemplary embodiment, all the individual traces on Layer 1 are routed from vias that connect Layer 4 and Layer 1 and a via that connects Layer 1 and Layer 2. The individual trace is routed to Layer 2 by the via and routed right to left in Layer 2 to a via that connects Layers 2 and 3. On Layer 2 the individual trace is routed to a via that connects Layers 3 and 4. On Layer 4 the individual trace is routed to a via that connects Layers 4 and 1, bringing the individual trace back to the first layer. The pattern can be repeated as many times as required for a specific length of the stranded trace.
An isometric view of the routing or path of one individual conductor trace through the conductor layers of one example embodiment is depicted in FIG. 53B. The path of one of the individual traces is highlighted by a thick black line. The individual trace traverses the width of the stranded trace on each layer from one via on one side of the stranded trace to a via on the other side of the stranded trace. The individual trace is routed to other layers by the vias. After traversing all of the four layers the individual trace returns to the starting layer and the pattern continues.
While the example routing patterns shown in FIG. 52A-FIG. 52B and FIG. 53A-FIG. 53B feature 90 degree angles in the individual traces that form the weave pattern, and is based on a rectilinear routing pattern for the individual traces, various other weave and routing patterns may be used. In exemplary embodiments, other weave and routing patterns may yield individual trace patterns that may be along substantially diagonal directions with respect to the axis of the stranded trace. For example, the individual traces may bend at shallower angles (such as 45 degrees) to help reduce the gap between traces. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to make each individual trace a slanted straight line connected directly between two vias. In other embodiments, various curves of the individual traces may be used when the stranded trace does not follow a straight line path along the circuit board, but turns or loops in a direction, for example. Several alternative exemplary diagonal weave and routing patterns for individual traces are shown in FIG. 54A and FIG. 54B, but many other patterns can be derived. In some applications some of the diagonal routing methods may be preferable. For example, for the routing shown in FIG. 54A, the individual traces are straight lines which may be preferable because it may result in the shortest overall conductor length while maintaining consistent spacing between adjacent individual traces. In embodiments, the weave pattern may differ between some or all of the conductor layers in a PCB. For the exemplary stranded trace shown in FIG. 52A and FIG. 52B, the weave pattern on the even layers differs from the weave pattern on the odd layers. In the exemplary stranded trace shown in FIG. 52A and FIG. 52B the individual traces are routed a distance of four vias in the direction of the axis of the stranded trace in the odd layers while only a distance of three vias in the even layers.
As exemplified in FIG. 52A and FIG. 52B, the scheme of the present invention concentrates the vias on either side of the array or group of individual traces. Thus, the vias (which may have larger minimum feature sizes than traces and gaps between traces) do not take up space within or between the individual traces. This arrangement of the vias may lead to a higher overall density of traces and therefore to a lower AC resistance per cross-sectional area.
The exemplary routed structures described above can be generalized for stranded traces that comprise a various number of conducting layers of a layered PCB as well as various numbers of individual traces. The general characteristics of the routing method may be characterized by an integer N, representing the number of conductor layers, and an integer M, representing the number of individual conductor traces that make up the stranded trace.
For the designs and methods disclosed here, it may be preferable to have an even number of conductor layers. For some specific weave and routing patterns vias that connect traces on two layers may be used. A stranded trace with N conductor layers should have N types of vias connecting the different layers if each via connects only two layers. Each type of via is distinguished or differentiated by the layers that it connects. If each via connects only two layers, for an individual conductor to traverse all of the N layers of a PCB board, there should be N types of vias in the stranded trace. Preferably, there may be N/2 types of vias on either side of the stranded trace, arranged in a fixed repeating order. In the exemplary pattern shown in FIG. 52A and FIG. 52B, of the four types of vias, two types of vias, those that connect Layers 4 and 1 and Layers 2 and 3 are located only on one side of the stranded trace while the other two types of vias, those that connect Layers 1 and 2 and Layers 3 and 4 are located on the other side of the stranded trace. On each layer, an individual trace may preferably be routed in a substantially diagonal direction with respect to the axis of the stranded trace such that it has a displacement of a distance equivalent to at least N/2 vias. All individual conducting traces on a layer may have the same displacement in the axis of the stranded trace.
The number of individual traces that make make-up a stranded trace may be at least partially determined by the total displacement, sometimes characterized by the number of vias that are passed by, that an individual trace makes after traveling through all the conductor layers of a PCB. If the displacement, after all the layers have been traversed, is D vias, then the stranded trace may be comprised of up to D/(N/2) individual traces. This relationship can be seen in the example in FIG. 53A and FIG. 53B. The individual trace represented by the dotted line is displaced a distance equivalent to 14 vias along the axis of the stranded trace after traversing through all of the conductor layers. Since the example had N=4 layers, the total number of individual conductors that make up the stranded conductor is M=14/2=7.
A stranded trace can be optimized by considering the number of individual traces included in the strand. The larger the number of individual traces, the longer each individual trace spends on any one layer which may reduce the effectiveness of the weaving pattern on reducing skin/proximity effects.
If the number of individual traces and the number of conductor layers are chosen appropriately, it may be possible to ensure that each individual trace will be displaced the same distance in each layer along the axis of the stranded conductor. A sufficient condition for this to occur is to choose M(N/2) such that it is divisible by N and to choose M such that (M/2)mod(N/2) and N/2 are co-prime where “mod” is the modulo operation.
FIG. 55 shows another example of a partial pattern of weaved individual traces of the proposed methods. The figure depicts the individual traces of the first layer of a ten layer stranded trace design. The ten layer stranded trace consists of 136 separate conductors. The parameters of the stranded trace may allow complete symmetry in all ten layers of the stranded conductor. Each conductor layer pattern may be a translated mirror image of the previous layer. That is, the pattern of traces on odd-numbered layers may be the same pattern as the first layer translated in such a way that the ends of the individual trace segments are connected to the correct vias. The patterns for the even-numbered layers can be recovered by reflection symmetry and similar translations for this example.
FIG. 56 is a cross-sectional view representing the conducting layers of a multi-layered PCB. The individual trace segments on each layer (not visible), and therefore the currents they conduct, may flow primarily into the page but they have an additional sideways displacement along each layer, as indicated by the horizontal arrows in the figure. This horizontal displacement enables each trace to move from one side of the weave pattern on a given layer to the opposite side of the weave pattern. Once an individual trace segment reaches the edge of the weave pattern on a particular layer, it is connected by a via (indicated by vertical arrows) to another trace segment on the next layer of the board and makes its way back across the weave pattern in the opposite direction. This pattern repeats itself so that each individual trace spends an approximately equal amount of time at each position along the cross-section of the weave pattern. Alternatively, the individual traces may be routed between the layers in a non-sequential manner. Any permutation of the order of layers may be used. It may be preferable that each individual trace follow the same order or permutation of layers in a strand of traces. Note that the pattern may be continued by connecting trace segments on the bottom layer to trace segments on the top layer, or by routing the traces up and down following the alternate permutations described above.
Preferably, the cross-sectional dimensions of the individual traces that make up the stranded trace on a PCB are small enough (preferably smaller than one skin-depth δ=√{square root over (2/ωμrμ0σ))} that they render the losses induced by one individual trace or segment on its neighbors small compared to the losses of an isolated individual trace or segment (which for an individual trace smaller than a skin-depth will be close to the direct current (DC) losses). The braiding of the strands helps to ensure that all the strands may have substantially the same impedance, so that if the same voltage is applied across the bundled strands (i.e., the strands are driven in parallel), the strands may individually conduct substantially the same current. Because the AC current may be distributed uniformly across the strands, the AC resistance may be minimized further.
As an illustration of the above, finite element analysis simulations were performed on stranded traces made of individual copper traces of square cross-section, driven at 250 kHz. The simulations were performed on stranded traces that have varying aspect ratios as well different dimensions of the individual conductors. The cross sections of the stranded traces, showing the cross-section of the individual traces in gray are shown in FIG. 58A-FIG. 58D. At this frequency, the skin depth of pure copper is  ̃131 μm. If we arrange individual traces that are 152 μm×152 μm in cross-section 5801 (a little larger than one skin depth) into a square array of 8 layers such that the gap between nearest traces both along and between the layers is 76 μm as in FIG. 58A, we find that the resistance per meter of a stranded trace conductor braided similarly to the pattern in FIG. 52A and FIG. 52B may be 18.7 mΩ/m, which is 64% higher than the DC resistance per length of this structure, 11.4 mΩ/m. By contrast, the resistance per length of this structure if the traces are not braided, or all parallel to the axis of the stranded trace is 31.2 mΩ/m, nearly 3 times the DC value.
If we make the individual traces of the stranded trace 76 μm×76 μm in cross section 5802 and arrange them into a square array of 16 layers such that the gap between traces is 38 μm as in FIG. 58B (the overall cross-section being thus essentially unchanged from the previous example), we find that the AC resistance of a braided structure may be 13.2 mΩ/m, about 16% higher than the DC value.
In the case where the cross-sectional dimensions of the traces cannot be made much smaller than the skin-depth (e.g., because of limitations in manufacturing), the proximity losses may be reduced by increasing the aspect ratio of the individual traces. The aspect ratio in this context is the effective width of the stranded conductor on a single trace divided by the thickness of the stack of conducting and insulating layers that make up the stranded trace. In some cases, the thickness of the stranded trace is given roughly by the thickness of the PCB. Simulations show that if the aspect ratio of the strand of 152 μm×152 μm traces described above is changed so that there are twice as many trace segments on each layer, but half as many layers as depicted in FIG. 58C, the AC resistance at 250 kHz may be reduced from 18.7 mΩ/m to 16.0 mΩ/m. For the structure with 76 μm×76 μm traces, again keeping the number of individual conductors the same, but reducing the thickness of the structure by a factor of two as depicted in FIG. 58D lowers the AC resistance from 13.2 mΩ/m to 12.6 mΩ/m. The DC resistance per length in both cases is 11.4 mΩ/m. In embodiments, the preferable aspect ratio of the stranded trace may be application dependent. In embodiments, a variety of factors may be considered in determining the best weave patterns for specific high-Q inductive element designs.
A benefit of the proposed approach is that the vias used in the stranded traces may perforate the board completely. That is, there is no need for partial vias or buried vias. Using vias that perforate the board completely may simplify the manufacturing process. For example, several boards can be stacked together and perforated at the same time. Partial vias, or vias that go through only a few consecutive layers of a PCB typically require perforation prior to assembly of the individual layers. Likewise, buried vias, or vias that connect or go through some internal layers of a PCB require perforation and preparation prior to assembly of the outer layers of the PCB during manufacturing.
Another benefit of the methods and designs described herein is that the location of vias at the outer edges of the weave pattern may allow for smaller separations between multi-turn or higher density stranded trace patterns. When two stranded traces run near each other on a PCB, or when a single stranded trace is shaped, patterned, folded, turned, and/or routed so that different sections of the stranded trace run near each other on the PCB, the separation between these traces may be reduced by reusing or interspacing the nearby vias. For example, FIG. 57 shows the top layer of a PCB with two stranded traces 5701, 5702 that share the same row of vias wherein, for clarity, the vias of the right stranded trace 5702 are depicted as white filled circles while the vias of the left stranded trace 5701 are depicted as black circles. The vias 5703 between the two stranded traces 5701, 5702, are all in the same row and there is substantially no spacing between the two stranded traces. With the use of buried or blind vias, which individually do not traverse or go through the whole thickness or all the layers of a PCB may be stacked on top of each other and the density of the routing of the individual conductor traces can be further increased since the spacing between the vias may not need to be increased to accommodate the vias of an adjacent stranded trace.
It will be clear to those skilled in the art that many changes and modifications can be made to the examples shown within the spirit of the invention. For example, although through vias which perforate the PCB may be used with the methods, blind vias or buried vias may also be used. It may be possible to have more than one via stacked on top of another, and one via location may be used to connect more than two sets of conductor layers together which may be used to increase the density of the conductor traces in the stranded trace. Likewise, although examples use vias that connected only two board (conductor) layers together, the routing method may be modified such that each conductor trace is routed on multiple layers simultaneously. Other modification in the spirit of the proposed methods may include routing individual conductor traces from one via to multiple vias, routing from multiple vias to one via on each layer, using multiple conductor traces to route from one via to another on each conductor layer, or any combination thereof.
In some embodiments it may be beneficial to misalign the conductor traces between the layers to ensure that the traces all present substantially the same impedance.
The stranded traces may be useful in a large diverse set of applications and may serve as a substitute in any application that typically used traditional braided litz wire. The stranded trace may be routed in a loop or loops of various shapes and dimensions to create a coil that may be used in magnetic field power transfer systems such as traditional induction based power transfer systems or near-field magnetic resonance power transfer systems. In some embodiments and applications where the stranded trace may be used as part of a resonator, the trace dimensions, aspect ratio, routing pattern, and the like may be chosen and optimized to maximize the Q of the resonator. In embodiments, the resonant frequency of the high-Q resonator may be chosen to take advantage of specific weave patterns and/or stranded trace designs.
In embodiments, the PCB stranded trace loops may be routed such that a core of magnetic material may be placed in the middle of the loop to create a cored loop. The PCB may have a number of cutouts, channels, pockets, mounts, or holes to accommodate a core.
In embodiments, the PCB of the stranded trace may further be used to carry and integrate other electronics or electronic components. Electronics to power or drive a resonator formed by the stranded trace may be located on the same PCB as the traces.
Adjustable Source Size
The efficiency of wireless power transfer methods decreases with the separation distance between a source and a device. The efficiency of wireless power transfer at certain separations between the source and device resonators may be improved with a source that has an adjustable size. The inventors have discovered that the efficiency of wireless power transfer at fixed separations can be optimized by adjusting the relative size of the source and device resonators. For a fixed size and geometry of a device resonator, a source resonator may be sized to optimize the efficiency of wireless power transfer at a certain separations, positions, and/or orientations. When the source and device resonators are close to each other, power transfer efficiency may be optimized when the characteristic sizes or the effective sizes of the resonators are similar. At larger separations, the power transfer efficiency may be optimized by increasing the effective size of the source resonator relative to the device resonator. The source may be configured to change or adjust the source resonator size as a device moves closer or further away from the source, so as to optimize the power transfer efficiency or to achieve a certain desired power transfer efficiency.
In examples in this section we may describe wireless power transfer systems and methods for which only the source has an adjustable size. It is to be understood that the device may also be of an adjustable size and achieve many of the same benefits. In some systems both the source and the device may be of an adjustable size, or in other systems only the source, or only the device may be of an adjustable size. Systems with only the source being of an adjustable size may be more practical in certain situations. In many practical designs the device size may be fixed or constrained, such as by the physical dimensions of the device into which the device resonator must be integrated, by cost, by weight, and the like, making an adjustable size device resonator impractical or more difficult to implement. It should be apparent to those skilled in the art, however, that the techniques described herein can be used in systems with an adjustable size device, an adjustable size source, or both.
In this section we may refer to the “effective size” of the resonator rather than the “physical size” of the resonator. The physical size of the resonator may be quantified by the characteristic size of the resonator (the radius of the smallest circle than encompasses an effectively 2-D resonator, for example). The effective size refers to the size or extent of the surface area circumscribed by the current-carrying inductive element in the resonator structure. If the inductive element comprises a series of concentric loops with decreasing radii, connected to each other by a collection of switches, for example, the physical size of the resonator may be given by the radius of the largest loop in the structure, while the effective size of the resonator will be determined by the radius of the largest loop that is “switched into” the inductor and is carrying current.
In some embodiments, the effective size of the resonator may be smaller than the physical size of the resonator, for example, when a small part of the conductor comprising the resonator is energized. Likewise, the effective size of the resonator may be larger than the physical size of the resonator. For example, as described below in one of the embodiments of the invention, when multiple individual resonators with given physical sizes are arranged to create a resonator array, grid, multi-element pattern, and the like, the effective size of the resonator array may be larger than the physical size of any of the individual resonators.
The relationship between wireless power transfer efficiency and source-device resonator separation is shown in FIG. 59A. The plot in FIG. 59A shows the wireless power transfer efficiency for the configuration shown in FIG. 59B where the source 5902 and device 5901 capacitively loaded conductor loop resonators are on axis 5903 (centered) and parallel to each other. The plot is shown for a fixed size 5 cm by 5 cm device resonator 5901 and three different size source resonators 5902, 5 cm×5 cm, 10 cm×10 cm and 20 cm×20 cm for a range of separation distances 5906. Note that the efficiency of wireless power transfer at different separations may depend on the relative sizes of the source and device resonators. That is, the size of the source resonator that results in the most efficient wireless power transfer may be different for different separations between the source and the device resonators. For the configuration captured by the plot in FIG. 59A, for example, at smaller separations the efficiency is highest when the source and device resonators are sized to be substantially equal. For larger separations, the efficiency of wireless power transfer is highest when the source resonator is substantially larger than the device resonator.
The inventors have discovered that for wireless power transfer systems in which the separation between the source and device resonators changes, there may be a benefit to a source that can be configured to have various effective resonator sizes. As a device is brought closer to or further away from the source, the source resonator may change its effective resonator size to optimize the power transfer efficiency or to operate in a range of desired transfer efficiencies. Such adjustment of the effective resonator size may be manual or automatic and may be part of the overall system control, tracking, operating, stabilization and optimization architectures.
A wireless power transfer system with an adjustable source size may also be beneficial when all devices that are to be powered by the source do not have similarly sized device resonators. At a fixed separation between a source and a device, devices with two different sizes of device resonators may realize maximum transfer efficiency for different sized source resonators. Then, depending on the charging protocols and the device power requirements and hierarchies, the source may alter its size to preferentially charge or power one of the devices, a class of devices, all of the devices, and the like.
Furthermore, an additional benefit from an adjustable size source may be obtained when a single source may be required to simultaneously power multiple devices. As more devices require power, the spatial location or the area circumscribed by the source resonator or the active area of the source resonator may need to change. For example, if multiple devices are positioned in an area but are separated from each other, the source may need to be enlarged in order to energize the larger area that includes all the multiple devices. As the number of devices requiring power changes, or their spatial distribution and locations change with respect to the source, an adjustable size source may change its size to change the characteristics and the spatial distribution of the magnetic fields around the source. For example, when a source is required to transfer power to a single device, a relatively smaller source size with the appropriate spatial distribution of the magnetic field may be used to achieve the desired wireless power transfer efficiency. When the source is required to transfer power to multiple devices, a larger source size or a source with a different spatial distribution of the magnetic field may be beneficial since the devices may be in multiple locations around the source. As the number of devices that require power changes, or their distributions or power requirements change, an adjustable size source may change its size to adjust, maximize, optimize, exceed, or meet its operating parameters and specifications.
Another possible benefit of an adjustable source size may be in reducing power transfer inefficiencies associated with uncertainty or variability of the location of a device with respect to the source. For example, a device with a certain lateral displacement relative to the source may experience reduced power transfer efficiencies. The plot in FIG. 60A shows the wireless power transfer efficiency for the configuration shown in FIG. 60B where the source 6002 and device 6001 capacitively loaded conductor loop resonators are parallel to each other but have a lateral offset 6008 between their center axes 6006, 6005. The plot in FIG. 60A shows power transfer efficiency for a 5 cm×5 cm device resonator 6001 separated from a parallel oriented 5 cm×5 cm source resonator 6002 (bold line) or a 20 cm×20 cm source resonator 6002 (dotted line) by 2 cm 6008. Note that at a lateral offset 6007 of approximately 5 cm from the 5 cm×5 cm source resonator (from the center of the device resonator to the center of the source resonator), there is a “dead spot” in the power transfer efficiency. That is, the transfer efficiency is minimized or approaches zero at a particular source-device offset. The dashed line in FIG. 60A shows that the wireless power transfer efficiency for the same device at the same separation and same lateral offset but with the source size adjusted to 20 cm by 20 cm may be greater than 90%. The adjustment of the source size from 5 cm×5 cm to 20 cm×20 cm moves the location of the “dead spot” from a lateral offset of approximately 5 cm to a lateral offset of greater than 10 cm. In this example, adjusting the source size increases the wireless power transfer efficiency from almost zero to greater than 90%. Note that the 20 cm×20 cm source is less efficient transferring power to the 5 cm×5 cm device resonator when the two resonators are on axis, or centered, or are laterally offset by less than approximately 2 to 3 cm. In embodiments, a change in source size may be used to move the location of a charging or powering dead spot, or transfer efficiency minimum, allowing greater positioning flexibility for and/or higher coupling efficiency to, a device.
In some embodiments, a source with an adjustable size may be implemented as a bank of resonators of various sizes that are selectively driven by a power source or by power and control circuitry. Based on predetermined requirements, calculated requirements, from information from a monitoring, sensing or feedback signal, communication, and the like, an appropriately sized source resonator may be driven by a power source and/or by power and control circuitry and that size may be adjusted as the requirements or distances between the source and the device resonators change. A possible arrangement of a bank of differently sized resonators is shown in FIG. 61 which depicts a bank of three differently sized resonators. In the example of FIG. 61, the three resonators 6101, 6102, 6103 are arranged concentrically and coupled to power and control circuitry 6104. The bank of resonators may have other configurations and arrangements. The different resonators may be placed side by side as in FIG. 62, arranged in an array, and the like.
Each resonator in a multi-size resonator bank may have its own power and control circuitry, or they each may be switched in and selectively connected to one or more power and control circuits by switches, relays, transistors, and the like. In some systems, each of the resonators may be coupled to power and control circuitry inductively. In other systems, each of the resonators may be coupled to power and control circuitry through additional networks of electronic components. A three resonator configuration with additional circuitry 6201, 6202, 6203 is shown in FIG. 62. In some systems, the additional circuitry 6201, 6202, 6203 may be used for impedance matching between each of the resonators 6101, 6102, 6103 and the power and control circuitry 6204. In some systems it may be advantageous to make each of the resonators and its respective additional circuitry have the same effective impedance as seen from the power and control circuitry. It some embodiments the effective impedance of each resonator and additional impedance matching network may be matched to the characteristic impedance of the power source or the power and control circuitry. The same effective impedance for all of the resonators may make switching between resonators in a resonator bank easier, more efficient, or quicker and may require less tuning or tunable components in the power and control circuitry.
In some embodiments of the system with a bank of multi-sized resonators, the additional circuitry 6201, 6202, 6203 may also include additional transistors, switches, relays, and the like, which disable, deactivate, or detune a resonator when not driven or powered by the power and control circuitry. In some embodiments of the system, not all of the resonators in a resonator bank of a source may be powered or driven simultaneously. It such embodiments of the system, it may be desirable to disable, or detune the non-active resonators to reduce energy losses in power transfer due to energy absorption by the unpowered resonators of the source. The unpowered resonators of the source may be deactivated or detuned from the resonant frequency of the other resonators by open circuiting, disrupting, grounding, or cutting the conductor of the resonator. Transistors, switches, relays and the like may be used to selectively open or close electrical paths in the conductor part of a resonator. An unpowered resonator may be likewise detuned or deactivated by removing or adding capacitance or inductance to the resonator with switches, transistors, relays, and the like. In some embodiments, the natural state of individual resonators may be to be detuned from the system operating frequency and to use signals or power from the drive signal to appropriately tune the resonator as it is activated in the bank.
In some embodiments of a system of a source with a bank of multi-sized resonators, multiple resonators may be driven by one or more power and control circuits simultaneously. In some embodiments of the system powered resonators may be driven out of phase to extend or direct the wireless power transfer. Constructive and destructive interference between the oscillating magnetic fields of multiple resonators driven in-phase or out of phase or at any relative phase or phases may be used to create specific “hotspots” or areas of concentrated magnetic energy. In embodiments, the position of these hotspots may be variable and may be moved around to achieve the desired wireless power transfer efficiencies to devices that are moving around or to address devices at different locations, orientations, and the like. In embodiments, the multi-sized source resonator may be adjusted to implement a power distribution and/or sharing algorithm and/or protocol.
In some embodiments of a bank of multi-sized resonators, the resonators may all have substantially similar parameters and characteristics despite the differences in their size. For example, the resonators may all have similar impedance, resonant frequency, quality factor, wire gauge, winding spacing, number of turns, power levels, and the like. The properties and characteristics of the resonators may be within 20% of their values.
In other embodiments of a bank of multi-sized resonators, the resonators may have non-identical parameters and characteristics tailored or optimized for the size of each resonator. For example, in some embodiments the number of turns of a conductor for the larger resonator may be less than for the smallest resonator. Likewise, since the larger resonator may be intended for powering devices that are at a distance from the resonator, the unloaded impedance of the large resonator may be different than that of the small resonator that is intended for powering devices that are closer to the resonator to compensate for the differences in effective loading on the respective resonators due to the differences in separation. In other embodiments, the resonators may have different or variable Q's, they may have different shapes and thicknesses, they may be composed of different inductive and capacitive elements and different conducting materials. In embodiments, the variable source may be custom designed for a specific application.
In other embodiments, a source with an adjustable size may be realized as an array or grid of similarly sized resonators. Power and control circuitry of the array may selectively drive one or more resonators to change the effective size of the resonator. For example, a possible configuration of a grid of resonators is shown in FIG. 63. A grid of similarly sized resonators 6301 may be arranged in a grid and coupled to one or more power and control circuits (not shown). Each of the resonators 6301 of the array can be individually powered or any number of the resonators may be powered simultaneously. In the array, the effective size of the resonator may be changed by controlling the number, location, and driving characteristics (e.g. drive signal phase, phase offset, amplitude, and the like) of the powered resonators. For example, for the array of resonators in FIG. 63, the effective size of the resonator may be controlled by changing which individual resonators of the array are powered. The resonator may power only one of the resonators resulting in an effective resonator size 6304 which is equal to the size of one of the individual resonators. Alternatively, four of the individual resonators in the upper left portion of the array may be energized simultaneously creating an effective resonator size 6303 that may be approximately twice the size of each of the individual resonators. All of the resonators may also be energized simultaneously resulting in an effective resonator size 6302 that may be approximately three (3) times larger than the physical size each of the individual resonators.
In embodiments, the size of the array of individual resonators may be scaled to any size. In larger embodiments it may be impractical to have power and control circuitry for every individual resonator due to cost, wiring constraints, and the like. A switching bar of a cross-switch may be used to connect any of the individual resonators to as few power and control circuits as needed.
In embodiments of the array of individual resonators, the pattern of the individual energized resonators may be modified or optimized. The shape of the effective resonator may be rectangular, triangular, square, circular, or any arbitrary shape.
In embodiments of arrays of resonators, which resonators get energized may depend on the separation or distance, the lateral offset, the orientation, and the like, between the device resonator and the source resonator. The number of resonators that may be driven may, for example, depend on the distance and/or the orientation between the device resonators and the source resonators, the number of device resonators, their various power requirements, and the like. The location of the energized resonators in the array or grid may be determined according to the lateral position of the device with respect to the source. For example, in a large array of smaller individual resonators that may cover a floor of a room or a surface of a desk, the number of energized resonators may change as the distance between the device and the floor or desk changes. Likewise, as the device is moved around a room or a desk the location of the energized resonators in the array may change.
In another embodiment, an adjustable size source resonator may be realized with an array of multi-sized resonators. Several small equally sized resonators may be arranged to make a small assembly of small resonators. The small array may be surrounded by a larger sized resonator to make a larger assembly. The larger assembly may itself be arranged in an array forming a yet larger array with an even larger resonator that may surround the larger array which itself may be arranged in an array, and so on. In this arrangement, the source resonator comprises resonators of various physical sizes distributed throughout the array. An example diagram of an arrangement of resonators is shown in FIG. 64. Smaller resonators 6401 may be arranged in two by two arrays and surrounded by another resonator with a larger physical size 6402, forming an assembly of resonators. That assembly of resonators may be arranged in a two by two array and surrounded by a resonator with an even larger physical size 6403. The pattern can be repeated to make a larger array. The number of times each resonator or assembly of resonators is repeated may be configured and optimized and may or may not be symmetric. In the example of FIG. 64, each resonator and assembly may be repeated in a two by two array, but any other dimension of array may be suitable. Note that the arrays may be circular, square, rectangular, triangular, diamond shaped, and the like, or any combination of shapes and sizes. The use of multi-sized resonators in an array may have a benefit in that it may not require that multiple resonators be energized to result in a larger effective resonator. This feature may simplify the power and control circuitry of the source.
In embodiments, an adjustable source size may also be realized using planar or cored resonator structures that have a core of magnetic material wrapped with a capacitively loaded conductor, examples of which are shown in FIG. 11A-FIG. 11C, FIG. 12 and FIG. 13 and described herein. In one embodiment, as depicted in FIG. 65A, an adjustable source may be realized with a core of magnetic material 6501 and a plurality of conductors 6502, 6503, and 6504 wrapped around the core such that the loops of the different conductors do not overlap. The effective size of the resonator may be changed or adjusted by energizing a different number of the conductors. A larger effective resonator may be realized when several adjacent conductors are driven or energized simultaneously.
Another embodiment of an adjustable size source with a cored resonator is shown in FIG. 65B where a core of magnetic material 6505 is wrapped with a plurality of overlapping conductors 6506, 6507, 6508. The conductors may be wrapped such that each extends a different distance across the magnetic core 6505. For example, for the resonator in FIG. 65B, conductor 6508 covers the shortest distance or part of the core 6505 while conductors 6507 and 6506 each cover a longer distance. The effective size of the resonator may be adjusted by energizing a different conductor, with the smallest effective size occurring when the conductor that covers the smallest distance of the magnetic core is energized and the largest effective size when the conductor covering the largest distance of the core is energized. Each of the conductors may be wrapped to achieve similar inductances, impedances, capacitances, and the like. The conductors may all be the same length with the covering distance modified by changing the density or spacing between the multiple loops of a conductor. In some embodiments, each conductor may be wrapped with equal spacing thereby requiring conductors of different lengths for each winding. In other embodiments the number of conductors and the wrapping of each conductor may be further optimized with non constant or varying wrapping spacing, gauge, size, and the like.
Another embodiment of an adjustable size source with a cored resonator is shown in FIG. 65C where multiple magnetic cores 6509, 6510, 6511 are gapped, or not touching, and wrapped with a plurality of conductors 6512, 6513, 6514. Each of the magnetic cores 6509, 6510, 6511 is separated with a gap 6515, 6516 and a conductor is wrapped around each magnetic core, extending past the gap and around the adjacent magnetic core. Conductors that do not span a gap between two magnetic cores, such as the conductor 6513 in FIG. 65C, may be used in some embodiments. The effective size of the resonator may be adjusted by simultaneously energizing a different number of the conductors wrapped around the core. The conductors that are wrapped around the gaps between the magnetic cores may be energized guiding the magnetic field from one core to another extending the effective size of the resonator.
As those skilled in the art will appreciate, the methods and designs depicted in FIG. 65A-FIG. 65C may be extended to planar resonators and magnetic cores having various shapes and protrusions which may enable adjustable size resonators with a variable size in multiple dimensions. For example, multiple resonators may be wrapped around the extensions of the core shaped as in FIG. 13, enabling an adjustable size resonator that has a variable size in two or more dimensions.
In embodiments an adjustable size source resonator may comprise control and feedback systems, circuits, algorithms, and architectures for determining the most effective source size for a configuration of devices or objects in the environment. The control and feedback systems may use a variety of sensors, communication channels, measurements, and the like for determining the most efficient source size. In embodiments data from sensors, measurement circuitry, communication channels and the like may be processed by a variety of algorithms that select the appropriate source size.
In embodiments the source and device may comprise a wireless communication channel such as Bluetooth, WiFi, near-field communication, or modulation of the magnetic field which may be used to communicate information allowing selection of the most appropriate or most efficient source size. The device, for example, may communicate received power, current, or voltage to the source, which may be used by the source to determine the efficiency of power transfer. The device may communicate its position or relative position which may be used to calculate the separation distance between the source and device and used to determine the appropriate size of the source.
In embodiments the source may measure parameters of the resonator or the characteristics of the power transfer to determine the appropriate source size. The source may employ any number of electric or electronic sensors to determine parameters of various resonators or various configurations of source resonators of the source. The source may monitor the impedance, resistance, resonant frequency, the magnitude and phase of currents and voltages, and the like, of each configuration, resonator, or size of the source. These parameters, or changes in these parameters, may be used by the source to determine the most effective source size. For example, a configuration of the source which exhibits the largest impedance difference between its unloaded state and present state may be the most appropriate or the most efficient for the state of the system.
The operating parameters and the size of the source may be changed continuously, periodically, or on demand, such as in response to a request by the device or by an operator of the system. A device may request or prompt the source to seek the most appropriate source size during specific time intervals, or when the power or voltage at the device drops below a threshold value.
FIG. 66A-FIG. 66C depict a possible way a wireless power transfer system may use an adjustable source size 6604 comprising two different sized resonators 6601, 6605 during operation in several configurations and orientations of the device resonator 6602 in one possible system embodiment. When a device with a small resonator 6602 is aligned and in close proximity, the source 6604 may energize the smaller resonator 6605 as shown in FIG. 66A. When a device with a small resonator 6602 is aligned and positioned further away, the source 6604 may energize the larger resonator 6601 as shown in FIG. 66B. When a device with a small resonator 6602 is misaligned, the source 6604 may energize the larger resonator 6602 as shown in FIG. 66C. Finally, when a device with a large resonator 6602 is present, the source 6604 may energize the larger resonator 6601 as shown in FIG. 66D to maximize the power transfer efficiency.
In embodiments an algorithm for determining the appropriate source size may be executed on a processor, gate array, or ASIC that is part of the source, connected to the source, or is in communication with the source. In embodiments, the algorithm may sequentially energize all, or a subset of possible source configurations or sizes, measure operating characteristics of the configurations and choose the source size with the most desirable characteristics.
Wireless Power Transfer with Immersed Resonators
In embodiments, wireless power transfer systems may be designed to operate when one, two or more resonators are immersed in liquids, slurries, mud, ice, salt solutions, and the like, embedded in materials or surrounded by materials that may be lossy, and/or electrically conducting. In embodiments, power may be transferred wirelessly between one or more resonators that are under water, underground, in streams, in pavement, in cement, in slurries, in mud, in mixtures of materials, in pools of any type of liquid or viscous materials, in wells such as water wells, gas wells, oil wells and the like.
In embodiments, the source and/or device resonators of the wireless power transfer systems may be designed to reduce the magnitude of the electric field in or at lossy or conducting materials or objects that may be in the regions surrounding the resonators, especially those materials and regions nearest to the resonator, so as to achieve a desirable perturbed Q. In embodiments, enclosures with certain dimensions and positions relative to the conducting loops and electrical components of magnetic resonators may be used to improve the perturbed Q relative to an enclosure-free implementation. Such enclosures may support higher perturbed Q resonators in immersed resonator applications by providing spacing between locations where the electric field strength is relatively high and where the lossy or conducting materials may be located. For example, in applications where the resonator may be immersed in water, salt water, oil, gas, or other lossy materials, it may be beneficial to package a magnetic resonator to ensure a minimum separation distance between the lossy materials and the electrical components of the resonator.
The packaging, structure, materials, and the like of the resonator may be designed to provide a spacing or “keep away” zone from the conducting loops in the magnetic resonator. In some embodiments the keep away zone may be less than a millimeter around the resonator. In other embodiments the keep away zone may be less than 1 cm or less than 10 cm around the resonator. In embodiments the size of the keep away zone may depend on the levels of power transferred, the lossiness of the surrounding material, operating frequency of the resonator, size of the resonator, and the like. In embodiments, the size of the keep away zone may be restricted by physical constraints of the application and the keep away zone may be designed such that the perturbed Q of the resonator due to the lossy material outside of the keep away zone is at least 50% of the unperturbed Q of the resonator. In embodiments, the keep away zone may be designed such that the perturbed Q of the resonator is greater than 1% of the unperturbed Q.
In embodiments the keep away zone around the resonator may be provided by packaging that surrounds the resonator and may also surround the power and control circuitry of the resonator. Preferably the packaging may be constructed from non-lossy materials such as certain plastics, composites, plastic composites, Teflon, Rexolite, ABS, ceramics, stone, and the like. The resonator and circuitry may be encased in such packaging or the packaging may provide an outer barrier with another non-lossy material filling the keep away zone within the packaging. Alternatively, the keep-away zone inside the packaging may comprise vacuum, air, gas, sand, and the like. In embodiments the keep away zone may be provided by the components of the resonator or the circuitry. In embodiments the elements of the resonators and circuitry may provide a sufficient keep away zone for some applications, or the components of a resonator may be chosen to naturally provide for a large enough keep away zone. For example, in some applications the electrical insulation on a conductor of a resonator may provide a suitable keep away zone and may not require additional separation. Diagrams of a resonator 6704 with packaging 6702 providing a keep away 6710 zone around the resonator are shown in FIG. 67A and FIG. 67B. A resonator 6704 may be completely surrounded by an enclosure 6702 that provides separation and a keep away zone as shown in FIG. 67A. In other embodiments the packaging 6702 may surround and follow the shape of the resonator 6704 to provide a keep away zone around the inside and outside edges of a resonator as shown in FIG. 67B.
In an exemplary embodiment, depicted in FIG. 68, a 15 cm×15 cm×5 mm slab of magnetic material 6804 excited at 100 kHz by 10 6806 turns of conductors evenly spaced by 1 cm wound along one of the longer dimensions and immersed in a medium 6808 with resistivity ρ=0.2 Ω-m was modeled in a finite element analysis to show the effect of adding a keep away zone. When there was no keep away zone, the perturbing Q due to the lossy medium was 66. With the addition of a keep away zone 6802 shaped like a parallelepiped extending 1 cm from each face of the magnetic material, the perturbing Q was raised to 86. When the shortest distance between the magnetic material 6804 and the edge of the keep away zone 6802 was increased to 2.5 cm, the perturbing Q was calculated to be 119, and when this distance was increased to 10 cm, the perturbing Q improved to 318.
In embodiments the keep away zone may not provide for a uniform keep away zone around the resonator but may be non uniform and may be larger or thicker in areas of the resonator that may have larger external electrical fields which may be near the capacitors or near the conductor windings or near the corners of the resonator, for example. This may be illustrated by extending the example above, and exploiting the fact that the electric field may be largest along the directions transversing the magnetic moment of the structure. As depicted in FIG. 69, if the keep away zone along the magnetic moment of the resonator is reduced from 10 cm to 1 cm while the keep away zone along all other directions is kept at 10 cm, the perturbing Q is reduced from 318 to 255, while the volume occupied by the resonator and the keep away zone 6802 is reduced by more than 51% compared to the case where the keep away zone was 10 cm all around the resonator.
In embodiments, the resonant frequencies of the wireless power transfer system may be chosen to improve the perturbed Q of the system. For example, even though the intrinsic Q of an exemplary resonator may improve at higher frequencies, the perturbed Q may decrease at higher frequencies. Therefore, in exemplary embodiments, it may be preferable to choose operating frequencies that are lower than the frequency corresponding to the maximized intrinsic Q. In embodiments, the operating frequency may be chosen to be two to ten times lower than the optimum-Q frequency. In other embodiments, the operating frequency may be chosen to be 10 to 100 times lower than the optimum-Q frequency. In yet other embodiments, the operating frequency may be chosen to be one hundred to ten thousand times lower than the optimum-Q frequency. In embodiments, the operating frequency may be between 100 kHz and 500 kHz. In other embodiments, the operating frequency may be chosen to be between 10 kHz and 100 kHz. In yet other embodiments, the operating frequency may be between 500 kHz and 30 MHz.
In an exemplary embodiment, a capacitively-loaded conducting loop resonator with a loop radius of 15 cm, a resonant frequency of 100 kHz, and surrounded by a fluid with resistivity p=30 Ω-m was modeled to show the impact of resonator and enclosure design on perturbed Q. The modeled embodiment is shown in FIG. 67A. The capacitively-loaded conducting loop 6704 is enclosed in a box 6702 filled with air 6708. The spacing between the outer edge of the conducting loop or coil 6704 in FIG. 67A and the outer edge of the enclosure 6702 is the keep away zone. This spacing 6708 may be filled with air, it may be filled by the enclosure material itself, and/or it may be filled by preferably non-lossy materials such as plastic, composites, plastic composites, ceramics, stone, air, gas, sand, and the like. In embodiments, the loss tangent for the enclosure material may be low enough that it does not perturb the Q of the resonator. In embodiments, the loss tangent of the material may be low enough that it improves the perturbed Q of the enclosed resonator relative to the perturbed Q when the resonator is immersed directly in surrounding materials.
For the exemplary system shown in FIG. 67A, the intrinsic Q of the resonators increased as the number of turns of the resonator coil increased. However, the perturbed Q of the resonators decreased as the number of turns increased. The perturbed Q could be increased by increasing the size of the keep out zone 6710 between the edges of the coil 6704 and the edges of the enclosure 6702. In this exemplary embodiment, the perturbed Q of the 4-turn resonator was improved by more than a factor of two (2), for keep out zones larger than 1 cm, and approached its intrinsic Q when the spacing exceeded approximately 2.5 cm. Therefore, enclosures with keep out zones greater than 1 cm may enable efficient wireless power transfer even when the source and device resonators are immersed in or may be in the vicinity of lossy materials.
Some applications for wireless power transfer where at least one of the resonators is immersed in some material other than air may be currently enabled using directly wired solutions. For example, electrical wires may run along the bottom of a pond, through building materials, down a well shaft, through the hull of a boat, and the like. However, these wires, and the connectors that may be used to provide electrical continuity across different segments of the wiring may be prone to failure and may be expensive and/or difficult to replace when they do fail. In addition, they may be difficult or impossible to install because of positional and rotational uncertainties in the installation process and because that process may compromise the integrity of the structures that support the resonators. Wireless power transfer may be advantageous in these applications because it may accommodate gaps between the energy sources and the energy consuming devices or connections, thereby eliminating the need for wiring or electrical connectors in places where such wiring or connectors may be stressed, dangerous, or failure prone.
FIG. 70 shows an exemplary embodiment of a wireless power transfer system for an underwater sensor application. In this example, a wireless power source 7008 is housed in an annular housing 7004 that surrounds tubing 7002 that may house the wiring used to supply power from a remote generator to the source as well as being used to guide the source resonator 7008 to the general vicinity of the underwater sensor 7010. This tubing 7002 may be made from a variety of materials including steel, plastic, rubber, metal, and the like and may contain a variety of electronic components, strength members, tubes, valves, conduits and the like. The source 7008 may be used to wirelessly transfer power to a device resonator 7012 that may be coupled to a sensor 7010. In embodiments, multiple sensors may be arranged at different locations and depths and the wireless power source 7008 may be flexibly positioned to address multiple sensors simultaneously or one at a time.
FIG. 71A and FIG. 71B show two exemplary embodiments of capacitively-loaded conducting loop source resonators, one comprising magnetic materials (FIG. 71B), situated in a rotationally symmetric enclosure 7004. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 71B, the resonators may have dipole moments that are aligned either parallel to the tubing, defined here as the z-axis (i.e. resonator 7104), or parallel to the x-axis or y-axis (i.e. resonator 7104 and 7110 respectively) depending on the orientation of the conductor loop 7106 that is wrapped around the core of magnetic material 7108. In this exemplary embodiment, the highest energy transfer efficiency may be realized when the similarly-sized source and device resonators have z-directed dipole moments and the resonators are aligned. However, for this dipole orientation, the efficiency may vary through zero at relatively small translational misalignments of these resonators, as shown in FIG. 72, before recovering and falling off with larger offsets. If both resonators are y-directed, the maximum coupling efficiency may not be as high as for the z-oriented dipoles, but the transfer efficiency only goes to zero when the resonators are relatively far apart. A resonator that comprises orthogonally wrapped capacitively-loaded conducting loops, and can be modeled as having both z-directed and y-directed dipoles as shown in FIG. 12, may yield the highest transfer efficiencies over a range of operating scenarios. In embodiments, the orthogonal loops may be used simultaneously, or a selector or switch may be used to select between y-directed and z-directed dipole resonators to achieve the optimum performance. Note that different system considerations may impact which type of resonator is comprised by the source resonator and the device resonator.
When the source or device resonators are installed, positioned or activated, there may be uncertainty in the offset and rotation of the source resonators relative to the device resonators. Exemplary positional and rotational uncertainties are depicted in FIG. 73A and FIG. 73B. Source 7008 and device 7012 resonators may have rotational misalignment as shown in FIG. 73A or lateral or vertical misalignment as shown in FIG. 73B. For single resonator designs, misalignment of resonators may decrease the efficiency of power transfer. In embodiments, the source and device resonator sizes and materials and the alignment of their dipole moments relative to their physical dimensions may be chosen to maximize the range of positional and rotational misalignments over which sufficiently efficient energy transfer may be realized.
In other embodiments, the potential reduced efficiency associated with positional and rotational uncertainty may be unacceptable. In those embodiments, a number of source resonators may be incorporated in a housing, increasing the probability that at least one of those source resonators is located close enough to the device resonator to yield adequate performance. Exemplary implementations of such a source array are shown in FIG. 71A and FIG. 71B. Multiple resonators may be arranged in a circular fashion in an annular housing 7004 such that a resonator is located every several degrees around the housing such that regardless of the rotational uncertainty at least one source and device may have partial alignment. In addition multiple circular arrangements of resonators may be combined to increase the vertical height of the resonator array. An increase in vertical length of a source may increase the system's ability to tolerate vertical misalignments (along the z axis). In embodiments, the outer radius of the annular housing may be increased to increase the system's ability to tolerate horizontal misalignments (along the y-axis). Note that a variety of source resonator designs and array patterns may be used to implement this concept. The array patterns that are shown here are not meant to be limiting in any way. An array may comprise capacitively loaded loop resonators (FIG. 71A). An array may comprise planar resonators. In some embodiments planar resonators comprising a conductor wrapped around a core of magnetic material may be used. In an array of planar resonators the conductors of some resonators may be wrapped in orthogonal directions for different resonators as depicted in FIG. 71B.
In addition, the enclosure housing the resonators may be any shape and size and may be application specific. In some applications, the enclosures may be shaped as cubes, rectangular boxes, bulbs, balls, cylinders, sheets, and the like, and may be hollow, solid, or may comprise different materials in their centers. In embodiments, the primary housing and array design considerations may be housing strength, size, appearance, steerability, controllability, water, wind or earth resistance, and the like.
In embodiments, the multiple source resonators may be connected via switches so that after the source resonator array is installed or positioned, only one, or a few of the source resonators may be energized to achieve wireless power transfer. The system monitoring and control capabilities discussed herein may be used to determine which source resonators may be energized and included in the wireless power transfer system. In embodiments, the Q of the unused resonators may be spoiled or reduced to minimize interactions between these resonators and the energized resonators. The resonator Q's may be altered by remotely controllable switches, fuses, connections, and the like.
Note that the designs described above for source resonators may also be for device resonators.
In embodiments, a variety of resonator designs for wireless power transfer may be selected. In an exemplary well drilling application, the source and device resonators may comprise capacitively-loaded conducting loops with air cores or with cores that comprise magnetic materials, as shown in FIG. 68. The resonators may include conducting surfaces to redirect and/or guide the resonator fields to reduce the impact of steel or metallic tubing, structures, instruments, casings, and the like. The conducting surfaces and magnetic materials may be shaped to follow the form of certain well structures, such as being bowed outward to conform to the circular tubing and casings that may run up the center of the well. In embodiments, the surface of the magnetic material closest to structures made of metal or steel may comprise a layer of a higher conductivity material so as to reduce losses due to eddy currents on lossier structures. The shapes and sizes of the conducting materials may be the same as for the magnetic materials, or they may be different. In embodiments, conducting layers may conform to the surface of the magnetic materials or to the inside surfaces of an enclosure or to a feature that has been built into the enclosure. In embodiments, conducting layers may be attached to magnetic materials or separate from them. In embodiments, field shaping may be used to direct resonator fields away for lossy materials or structures and/or to direct or guide resonator fields towards other resonators in the power transfer system. In embodiments, capacitively-loaded conducting loops wrapped around magnetic materials such as shown in FIG. 11A-FIG. 11C, FIG. 12, FIG. 13, FIG. 14, FIG. 16A and FIG. 16B may be selected for transferring power from a main borehole in a well to a lateral borehole.
Note that a wireless transfer system for immersed resonator applications may comprise any combination of resonators, enclosures, arrays, electronics, monitoring and control methods as described herein. In embodiments, device resonators may also be installed in arrays, with a subset of the available resonators selected for the wireless power transfer system.
While the invention has been described in connection with certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art and are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure, which is to be interpreted in the broadest sense allowable by law.
All documents referenced herein are hereby incorporated by reference.

## Claims

1. A wireless power source for transferring power to a wirelessly chargeable mobile electronic device, the wireless power source comprising:
a source magnetic resonator comprising a capacitively-loaded conducting loop configured to generate an oscillating magnetic field to transfer wireless power to a device magnetic resonator of the electronic device, wherein the source magnetic resonator has an unperturbed source quality factor QS; and
material positioned to space lossy material from at least a portion of the conducting loop and thereby form a keep-out zone,
wherein the keep-out zone enables the source magnetic resonator to have a perturbed source quality factor, QS,perturbed, that is at least 50% of the unperturbed source quality factor QS when the lossy material is positioned immediately outside the keep-out zone.

2. The power source of claim 1, wherein the keep-out zone extends for a distance of more than 0.25 mm outward from the source magnetic resonator.

3. The power source of claim 1, wherein a maximum dimension of the keep-out zone is approximately 1.0% greater than a characteristic size of the source magnetic resonator.

4. The power source of claim 1, wherein a maximum dimension of the keep-out zone is approximately 0.1% greater than a characteristic size of the source magnetic resonator.

5. The power source of claim 1, wherein the source magnetic resonator further comprises a magnetic material.

6. The power source of claim 1, wherein the unperturbed source quality factor QS is greater than 100.

7. The power source of claim 1, further comprising source power and control circuitry coupled to the source magnetic resonator, wherein the keep-out zone extends beyond at least one surface of the source power and control circuitry.

8. The power source of claim 1, wherein the material forming the keep-out zone is a layer of material positioned to cover at least one side of the conducting loop.

9. The power source of claim 8, wherein the capacitively-loaded conducting loop of the source magnetic resonator is built on a printed circuit board (PCB).

10. The power source of claim 9, wherein the layer of material forming the keep-out zone and the printed circuit board are on opposite sides of the capacitively-loaded conducting loop.

11. The power source of claim 8, wherein the material forming the keep-out zone is insulation material on the conducting loop.

12. The power source of claim 1, wherein the lossy material has a non-zero, but finite conductivity.

13. The power source of claim 1, wherein the perturbed source quality factor, QS,perturbed is at least 50% of the unperturbed source quality factor QS when the lossy material spans the outside of the keep-out zone.

14. The power source of claim 13, wherein the perturbed source quality factor, QS,perturbed is at least 50% of the unperturbed source quality factor QS when the lossy material spans the outside of the keep-out zone and the lossy material has a resistivity of 0.2 ohms·meters at the frequency of the oscillating magnetic field.

15. The power source of claim 1, wherein the keep-out zone extends from the conducing loop by less than 1 cm.

16. The power source of claim 1, further comprising packaging for the source magnetic resonator, and wherein the material forming the keep-out zone is part of the packaging.

17. The power source of claim 1, wherein the material forming the keep-out zone comprises plastics, composites, plastic composites, Teflon, Rexolite, ABS, or ceramics.

18. The power source of claim 1, wherein the unperturbed source quality factor QS corresponds to the intrinsic quality factor of the source resonator.

19. A module for use in a wireless power system, the module comprising:
a magnetic resonator comprising a capacitively-loaded conducting loop built on a printed circuit board, wherein the magnetic resonator has an intrinsic quality factor Q greater than 100; and
a layer of insulating material positioned to cover the capacitively-loaded conducting loop and space lossy material from the conducting loop to thereby form a keep-out zone,
wherein the keep-out zone extends from the conducting loop by less than 1 cm and enables the magnetic resonator to have a perturbed quality factor, Qperturbed, that is at least 50% of the intrinsic quality factor Q when the lossy material is positioned immediately outside the keep-out zone and covers the keep-out zone.

20. The module of claim 19, wherein the perturbed quality factor, Qperturbed, is at least 50% of the intrinsic quality factor Q when the lossy material is positioned immediately outside the keep-out zone, covers the keep-out zone, and has a resistivity of 0.2 ohms·meters at the resonant frequency of the magnetic resonator.