alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

                    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on Thursday, April 9, 2015, in Multi-Purpose Room LL-006 at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will open at 9 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's Web site at                     *www.sec.gov.*

On March 18, 2015, the Commission issued notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 33-9739), indicating that the meeting is open to the public (except during portions of the meeting reserved for meetings of the Committee's subcommittees), and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a quorum of the Commission may attend the meeting.

The agenda for the meeting includes: Remarks from Commissioners; nomination of candidates for officer positions and election of officers; a discussion of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's investor behavior survey results; a discussion of background checks as a means to address elder financial abuse (which may include a recommendation); a discussion of proxy access and staff review of Rule 14a-8(i)(9) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (which may include a recommendation); an update on the SEC proxy voting roundtable; an update on the recommendations of the SEC Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies; and nonpublic subcommittee meetings.

For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

 Dated: April 2, 2015.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-08020 Filed 4-3-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE CODE 8011-01-P
Final Notes July 9, 2010 

### Steam Study Data Review Notes Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen EPA Method 351.2 (1993 ) ( Semi

- Automated Colorimetry )

1. If the sample was suspected to have nitrate concentrations greater than or equal to 10 times the TKN concentration, the sample should be diluted and reanalyzed

.

2. S amples should be placed in a digestor at 1 4 0°C for at least one hour, the temperature
should be reset to 380°C to heat for 1.5 hours, and 380°C should be maintained for 30 minutes (351.2/11.5)

. 1

3. A utomated continuous flow analysis equipment should be used to analyze samples (351.2/6.4)

. Indicate any deviations noted in the lab’s dig estion procedures.

4. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 5 times the analyte concentration in the laboratory reagent blank, report the result as a nondetect. List all affected samples:

5. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 10 times but greater than 5 times the analyte concentration in the laboratory reagent blank, report the result as an estimated value . List all affected samples:

1 Note: TestAmerica found that digesting initially at 140°C rather than 160°C as EPA method 351.2 requires produced better results by reducing splattering and overheating. The time increment was increased to ensure complete evaporation of water before in creasing the temperature to 380°C.
# Oregon-Vietnam partnership enhances skills; helps Soldiers find friends across the world

/ Published Oct. 2, 2014

HANOI, Vietnam – Ten domestic emergency and response experts from the Oregon National Guard’s CBRNE Enhanced Response Force Package (CERFP) participated in a series of informational and practical exchanges, Sept. 21–28, in Hanoi, Vietnam.

Nine Citizen-Soldiers from the Oregon Army National Guard’s 224th Engineer Company, and one Citizen-Airman from the Oregon Air National Guard’s 142nd Fighter Wing traveled halfway across the world to train with, learn from and engage with Vietnamese engineers of the 249th Engineer Brigade, Vietnam People’s Army, through Oregon’s State Partnership Program with Vietnam’s National Committee for Search and Rescue (VINASARCOM). The training includes a variety of search and rescue scenarios including rappelling, rescue hoist operations, casualty extraction and rigging.

The week-long exchange not only brought together search and extraction experts from two nations, but also forged friendships to last a lifetime.

“The Oregon SPP with Vietnam is an incredible opportunity for our Citizen-Soldiers to conduct foreign relations training with Vietnam, said Capt. Thanh Vo, 224th Engineer Company commander. “Where in the past we were fighting on opposite sides, today we are exchanging skills to better improve our capabilities to save our fellow countrymen’s lives.”

Facing temperatures in the high 90’s and low 100’s, with humidity so thick you could cut it with a knife, this group of Oregonians continued to not only provide top notch training, but also find the time throughout the day to make personal connections with the 74 Vietnamese engineers they worked with.

“The joint training environment that we worked in with the Vietnamese was beneficial to our Soldiers,” Vo continued. “It provided the opportunity to not only work with people outside of the National Guard, but to learn and train with Soldiers from an entirely different culture.”

Vo said the skills the Oregon Guardsmen learned in bridging communication barriers and creating relationships is key to solidifying the National Guard as a component of the United States’ international presence.

The Oregon National Guard formally began a partnership with Vietnam’s VINASARCOM in November of 2012 through the National Guard State Partnership Program.
ex10_5.htm


  
Exhibit 10.5


 


Director Compensation Program


 


Effective May 1, 2010, directors who are not employees of the Company or its subsidiaries are entitled to receive:


 



	
  

	
·

	
annual director compensation to each member of National Patent’s Board of Directors of (i) $25,000, paid in quarterly installments of $6,250 (except the Vice Chairman of National Patent’s Board of Directors who is to receive annual director compensation of $35,000, paid in quarterly installments of $8,750) and (ii) a one-time grant of an option to purchase 100,000 shares of Company common stock ; The option is to have an exercise price of fair market value on the date of grant, vest over three years, in approximately one-third increments each year commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and have a term of ten years;







 



	
  

	
·

	
$1,500 in cash for each meeting of the Board of Directors and for each committee meeting attended in person and $750 in cash for each Board of Directors or Board committee meeting attended by means of conference telephone connection;







 



	
  

	
·

	
annual compensation of $5,000, paid in quarterly installments of $1,250, to each member of the Audit Committee (except the Chairman of the Audit Committee who is to receive annual compensation of $10,000), plus $750 in cash for each meeting of the Audit Committee attended in person and $500 in cash for each meeting of the Audit Committee attended by telephone, except that the per meeting attendance fee is reduced to $500 for attendance at any Audit Committee meeting held on the same day as a regular or special meeting of the Board; and







 



	
  

	
·

	
annual compensation of $2,500, paid in quarterly installments of $625, to each member of the Compensation Committee and each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (except the Chairman of each such Committee, who is to receive annual compensation of $5,000), plus $750 in cash for each meeting of the Audit Committee attended in person and $500 in cash for each meeting of the Audit Committee attended by telephone, except that the per attendance meeting fee is reduced to $500 for attendance at any Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meeting held on the same day as a regular or special meeting of the Board.







 


At the option of each director, up to half of the sums designated above as “annual director compensation” may be paid in Company common stock; provided that (1) the option to receive Company common stock is exercisable by notice to the Company at anytime prior to the payment of one or more quarterly payments of the annual compensation and (2) common stock issued in lieu of annual compensation is valued at the average between the closing bid and ask price on the day prior to the date upon which the annual compensation became payable and (3) all right, title and interest in and to common stock issued will vest in the receiving director upon issuance and (4) payment in common stock will only be available if such payment may be made without registration or other similar actions and in compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3707 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude combat zone 

compensation of members of the Armed Forces from employment taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2009 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

combat zone compensation of members of the Armed 

Forces from employment taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Armed Forces Tax 

5 Relief Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF COMBAT ZONE COMPENSATION OF 

7 MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FROM EM8 PLOYMENT TAXES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 3121(i) 

10 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to service 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3707 IH

1 in the uniformed services) is amended by adding at the 

2 end the following new sentence: ‘‘The term ‘wages’ shall 

3 not include remuneration for active service performed in 

4 a month for which such individual is entitled to the bene5 fits of section 112 (relating to certain combat zone com6 pensation of members of the Armed Forces of the United 

7 States) to the extent remuneration for such service is ex8 cludable from gross income under such section.’’. 

9 (b) SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUNDS HELD HARM10 LESS.—There is hereby appropriated (out of any money 

11 in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated) for each fiscal 

12 year to each fund under the Social Security Act an amount 

13 equal to the reduction in the transfers to such fund for 

14 such fiscal year by reason of the amendment made by sub15 section (a). 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 this section shall apply with respect to service performed 

18 after December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF AP P EALS, T HIRD DISTRICT, AT AUST IN NO. 03-14-00357- CV Ernest Wayne Rials, Appellan t

v. Lin da Kather ine Rials, App ellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F LAMP ASAS CO UNTY, 27TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. 183 99, H ONO RAB LE JO HN GAUNTT, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A ND U M O PI N I O N The parties have filed a joi nt motion to dismi s s t h e appeal. Acc ording ly , we gr ant the motion and dismiss the appe al. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed on Agree d Motion Filed: Jul y

16, 2014
Exihibit 99.01
CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Malahat Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
 of the Company.


Dated June 19, 2003

/s/ Jake Neufeld
-------------

Jake Neufeld
President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             170
<SECURITIES>                                    10,059
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                        75
<INVENTORY>                                      1,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,964
<PP&E>                                           1,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                     569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74 
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,602
<SALES>                                          9,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,075
<CGS>                                            4,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,316)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (594)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,722)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3769 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3769

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain synthetic 
                            filament yarns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2009

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain synthetic 
                            filament yarns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SYNTHETIC FILAMENT YARNS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain synthetic filament 
yarns) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State ofConnecticut and

Pfizer Inc.

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order No. 8093C

Modification No.3

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Pfizer Inc.

('Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order

No. 8093C and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further modify said

modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ('Regulations) are hereby

replaced with May I, 20 IO.

2. Any references to October Ist with respect to the date by which the Respondents shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits ('DERCS) and/or allowances

for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31,

2010.

4. All references to September I, 2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September I, 2009.

5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 8093C and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent

shall comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and Order No. 8093C, as

modified, shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street· Hartford, CT 06106-5127

http://www.ct.gov/dep

All Equal Opportuniry Emp/oyer
·..

Pfizer Inc. 2 Trading Agreement and Order No. 8093C

Modification No.3

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

Pfizer Inc. ,

Signature: ~tl~-t"~

Name: Cme/O--' .4 )1", ke,vj'''' J ff

Title: iEx~(v-/v~ 2\~c+cr) f.{'Je.T

Date: ~rl I /"", 2001

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

~,&f- Director

Engineering and Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management

"";.'
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Steve Jobs, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Pixar on Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 1, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Pixar.



By:

/s/    STEVE JOBSName:  Steve Jobs Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




I, Simon T.
Bax, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Pixar on Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 1, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Pixar.



By:

/s/    SIMON T. BAXName:  Simon T. Bax Title:  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### *A. P. and L. T. Brown*vs. *Isaac A. Wood. Same*vs. *William Ashley.*

A deoree for the specific delivery of slaves, and an account for their hire, without any f order as to the costs, entitles the plaintiff to costs under tho 33 Rule of Court.

*Before*Dargan, Ch., *at Barnwell, February,*1854.

These were bills for the specific delivery of slaves. By the decree of Wardlaw, Ch., at February Sittings, 1853, the defendants were ordered to deliver up the slaves, and account for their hire ; and on appeal, the decree was affirmed. (Vide ante p. 155.) The Commissioner reported the sums due„by the defendants, respectively, for hire, and no exception was taken to the report. His Honor confirmed the report, and ordered each party to pay his own costs. From this order, the plaintiffs appealed on the ground, that the question as to costs was settled, in effect, by the circuit decree of Wardlaw, Ch., and the affirmation of the same by the Court of Appeals.

*Owens,*for appellants.

*Aldrich, Bellinger,*contra.

*360The opinion of the Court was delivered .by

Dunkin', Ch.

Since *Muse*vs. *Peay,*Dud. Eq. 236, it has been well settled that, when no direction is given with respect to costs, they shall follow the event of the suit. This is the construction given to the 33 rule of Court. 1 Des. Rep. 62. See *Higginbottam*vs. Peyton, 4 Rich. Eq. 314.

The plaintiffs filed their bill for the specific delivery of slaves, and their right was contested bjr the defendants. The bill was sustained by the Circuit Court, the right of the plaintiffs affirmed, and the defendants decreed to deliver up the slaves and account for their hire, without any order as to the costs. On appeal from this decree, the judgment was affirmed. This entitled the plaintiffs to costs, under the rule stated. The account for hire was merely incidental. If a bill had been filed to foreclose a mortgage given to secure a bond, and the validity of either had been contested, and a decree passed for the plaintiff, this would entitle him to costs, although a reference to the Commissioner might have been directed to calculate the interest on the bond.

It is ordered and decreed, that so much of the decretal order as directs each party to pay their own costs, be set aside; and that the plaintiffs have leave to enforce their decree for the amount thereof, together with their costs.

Johnston, Dargan and Wardlaw, CC., concurred.

*Decretal order set aside.*