alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bank Leumi USA, Respondent, v Peter Agati, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[774 NYS2d 499]

*293Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered May 5, 2003, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff bank’s motion for an order of attachment authorizing seizure of defendant-appellant guarantor’s personal property up to a value of $450,000, including, but not limited to, the property listed in appellant’s July 2000 personal financial statement, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to authorize seizure of only those items of personal property identified in the July 2000 financial statement, without prejudice to plaintiffs seeking to expand the scope of the attachment upon further identification of appellant’s personal property, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Order, denominated a judgment, same court and Justice, entered May 13, 2003, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment against appellant on the issue of appellant’s liability on the subject guarantee, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no merit to appellant’s claim that under UCC 9-207, he was relieved of liability on his guarantee by plaintiffs failure to act in a commercially reasonable manner in connection with the borrower’s voluntary sale of an item of collateral. According to appellant, plaintiff knew, prior to the sale, that the borrower was insolvent, yet opted not to fully satisfy the borrower’s debt out of the proceeds of the sale. The argument overlooks that UCC 9-207 requires that the secured party be in “possession or control” of the collateral. Although the sale here was part of a plan worked out between the borrower and plaintiff to reduce the former’s debts to the latter, including that guaranteed by appellant, plaintiff had no duty to appellant, under either the loan documents or the guarantee, the latter of which contained a broad and all encompassing consent to plaintiffs release of security, to collect more of the proceeds realized at the sale than it did *(see Chemical Bank v PIC Motors Corp.,*87 AD2d 447, 452-453 [1982], *affd*58 NY2d 1023 [1983]; *Chemical Bank v Nemeroff,*233 AD2d 239 [1996]). Accordingly, plaintiff was properly granted summary judgment against appellant on the issue of liability. However, concerning the attachment, the motion court *294erred in tracking the provision of the guarantee which, upon the borrower’s default and plaintiff’s unsatisfied demand for payment, gives plaintiff a lien against all of appellant’s property “of every description” *(see*CPLR 7102 [c]; UCC 9-108 [a]-[c]). Accordingly, we modify to limit the attachment to the personal property identified in appellant’s July 2000 financial statement. We note that such financial statement was provided to plaintiff for the purposes of the loan extended to the borrower. We have considered appellant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.
#### De Brahm and others *vs.*Executors of Fenwick.

*osevz.*

Reg. book, p. 34.

The comí ordered e/iíite devised to r soil, to he sold, Co *p:y*legacies charged cr. il; mid if; re-hebarse late for 'properly taiei awry }<y the legatee *nvi.*devisee,

Ordered that the master’s report be confirmed, except in the following particulars. Several unimportant particulars are stated in the order, but there were two of a peculiar kind which merit notice. The testator had left a large estate-, and a numerous family, consisting of a widow and many children, some of whom were adults,, and some of them minors. During the- troubles and confusion of the war, Thomas anil Edward Fenwick, two of the testator’s sons and legatees, had taken and removed come of the negroes of the estate, and appropriated and disposed of them to their own use. They then went and remained out of the jurisdiction of the court. '

Upon this part of the case the court ordered, *<'*that so much of Thomas Fenwick’s estate (under his father’s will) be sold as will be sufficient to satisfy the proportion that is to be raised ant of it to pay the portions of Mu sisters, charged on it by their father’s will, *and to ampini-sate the loss the estate*of *the testator has sustained fnj ?iapv<‘$ and other property taken away by*him» Ordered that the master do enquire and ascertain the loss the estate lias met with by Edward Fenwick’s having taken away some of the negroes, and other property belonging to the said caíate, and report thereon next March.”
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3147 

To provide members of the reserve components access to the Tour of Duty 

system. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2021 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Ms. ERNST) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide members of the reserve components access to 

the Tour of Duty system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reservists Opportunity 

5 Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO TOUR OF DUTY SYSTEM. 

7 (a) ACCESS.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year 

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec10 retary of the Army shall ensure, subject to paraVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:03 Nov 04, 2021 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3147.IS S3147

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3147 IS

1 graph (2), that a member of the reserve components 

2 of the Army may access the Tour of Duty system 

3 using a personal internet-enabled device. 

4 (2) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary of the Army 

5 may restrict access to the Tour of Duty system on 

6 personal internet-enabled devices if the Secretary de7 termines such restriction is necessary to ensure the 

8 security and integrity of information systems and 

9 data of the United States. 

10 (b) TOUR OF DUTY SYSTEM DEFINED.—In this sec11 tion, the term ‘‘Tour of Duty system’’ means the online 

12 system of listings for opportunities to serve on active duty 

13 for members of the reserve components of the Army and 

14 through which such a member may apply for such an op15 portunity, known as ‘‘Tour of Duty’’, or any successor to 

16 such system. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
=============================================================================
Household Finance Corporation
Household Revolving Home Equity Loan 
Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates - Series 1995-2
P & S Agreement Date:              Nov 1, 1995
Original Settlement Date:           Nov 21, 1995
Series Number of Class A-1 Certificates:     441919AG2
Series Number of Class A-2 Certificates:     N/A
Original Sale Balance:             $637,660,000
=============================================================================

                                                         Total 1996 (1)
                                                    Sum of 1/22/96 - 12/20/96
                                                       Distribution Dates




Total Investor Distribution                             $161,643,852.21

Investor Interest Distribution Class A-1                 $34,813,141.58

Investor Principal Distribution Class A-1               $126,830,710.63


(1) These amounts represent cash distributions paid by the trust during the   
1996 distribution period.  As such, they do not represent the economic
accrual of interest for tax purposes.
14306

#### SIKES v. LAWRENCE *ET AL.*

(186 S. E., 926))

Before Johnson, J., Beaufort,

June, 1935.

*Messrs. Wm. N. Levin*and *W. Brantley Harvey,*for appellant,

*Messrs. Randolph Murdaugh*and *John P. Wise,*for respondents,

June 8, 1936.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

This case is founded upon the same circumstances and occurrences upon which the case of *Nancy A. Cravens v. Lawrence*(S. C.), 186 S. E., 269, is founded. The same motion *236for removal to the Federal Court’ was made and a similar order was made by Judge Johnson, and the appeal is upon the same grounds. It follows that the action of this Court in the *Cravens case*is decisive of this appeal.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of this Court is that the order appealed from is reversed.

This opinion was written as a result of a rehearing in this case and is substituted for the opinion of the Court heretofore filed, which is ordered withdrawn.

Mr. Ci-iiee Justice Stabeer and Messrs. Justices Carter, Baker and Fishburne concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, May 14, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Theresa Singleton at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3329.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be held Thursday, May 14, 2015, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Theresa Singleton. For more information please contact: Theresa Singleton at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3329, TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1509—National Office, Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The agenda will include a discussion on various letters, and other issues related to written communications from the IRS.

Dated: April 7, 2015.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2015-08437 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00178-CV

WANDELL REID, Appellant

V.

DOW CORNING CORPORATION, DOW CORNING WRIGHT 

CORPORATION, FRANK J. GEROW MD, THOMAS D. CRONIN MD, 

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, and 

BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, Appellees

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1992-25394D

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order signed January 29, 2013. On March 27, 

2013, appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher and McCally.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly report of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Zhilin Li,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Basic Empire  Corporation  and will be retained by Basic Empire
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                                      Date: November 8, 2006

                                                      By: /s/ Zhilin Li
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3593 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3593

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 to 
   extend by one year the operation of Radio Free Asia, and for other 
                                purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF OPERATION OF RADIO FREE ASIA.
    Section 309(f) of the United States International Broadcasting Act 
of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6208(f)) is amended by striking ``2009'' and 
inserting ``2010''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00172-CV

J-W POWER COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

DUVAL COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-19-210

Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the May 10, 2021 judgment is 

AFFIRMED. We ORDER appellant J-W Power Company to pay the costs of this appeal.

SIGNED March 16, 2022.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
November 16, 2015

Attn: U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operation s West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590
RE: STEVEN LIGHTCAP JR AND AARON BAUM OF ELITE DRON E SERVICES LLC. REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91 .7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom 3 and Blade 350 QX3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 11 2-95) Addendum- I would like to add the following UAS to m y exemption, DJI INSPIRE ONE, DJI S900, DJI S1000. To be included with my origina l UAS's DJI PHANTOM 3, and BLADE 350QX3. These UAS's will be used for Aerial Photography and Videography, Inspection and Patrolling, Agriculture Documenting, Wildlife and F orestry Monitoring, Surveying, Search and Rescue, Disaster and catastrophe events, Motion Picture Filming, Aerial Imaging/Mapping, Cinematography, Roof Inspections. All of the rules set by the FAA will be followed wi th extreme precaution to the safety of the public. All pre-flight checklist will be excute d. All UAS's will be used in accordance with the FAA rules and regulations. Thank you for y our time and please call me with any questions.

Steven Lightcap Jr - Operator Elite Drone Services LLC 11532 Crescent Pines Blvd. Clermont, FL 34711 352-267-9132

1EliteDroneServices@yahoo.com

Aaron Baum - Operator Elite Drone Services LLC 352-572-9993 EliteDroneServices@yahoo.com

2
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Innovation,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marlene
  C. Schluter, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2004

//s// Marlene C. Schluter
  Marlene C. Schluter, Director, 
  Principal Financial Officer

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB of
Weststar Financial Services Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented
therein.

                                    WESTSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Date: November 12, 2003         By: /s/   Randall C. Hall
                                    --------------------------------------------

                                    Randall C. Hall
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    and Principal Accounting Officer


                                                                              26
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  August 9, 2010








/s/ Frank Waung


---------------------


Name: Frank Waung


Title: Chief Financial Officer


(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| (1)     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:   August 19, 2016 | By:    | /s/  Kyle Kennedy                                                                                                                                        |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | Kyle Kennedy                                                                                                                                                  |   |
|                               |   | President,Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and acting Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40120 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JORGE IVAN TORRES-REYNOSO, also known as Adolfo Adrian Torres, also known as Crispin Pacheco, also known as Juan Raymundo Torres, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-99-CR-287-1

-------------------- August 23, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Ivan Torres-Reynoso has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Torres has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’sNo. 00-40120 -2- motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.