alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3609 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the capital gain 

or loss treatment of the sale or exchange of mitigation credits earned 

by restoring wetlands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2009 

Mr. MELANCON (for himself and Mr. TANNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

the capital gain or loss treatment of the sale or exchange 

of mitigation credits earned by restoring wetlands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wetlands Conservation 

5 Investment Act of 2009’’. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3609 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF SALES OR EX2 CHANGES OF WETLAND MITIGATION CRED3 ITS AS LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAIN OR LOSS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part IV of subchapter P of chap5 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

6 by inserting after section 1257 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 1257A. GAINS OR LOSSES FROM SALES OR EX8 CHANGES OF WETLANDS MITIGATION CRED9 ITS. 

10 ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—Gain or loss attributable to 

11 the sale or exchange of a mitigation bank credit by the 

12 sponsor of the mitigation bank who earned such credit 

13 shall be considered the sale or exchange of a capital asset 

14 held for more than 1 year. 

15 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, the 

16 terms ‘mitigation bank’ and ‘mitigation bank credit’ have 

17 the respective meanings given such terms by part 332 of 

18 title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations.’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 for part IV of subchapter P of chapter 1 of such Code 

21 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 

22 1257 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 1257A. Gains or losses from sales or exchanges of wetlands mitigation 

credits.’’. 

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

24 this section shall apply with respect to sales or exchanges 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3609 IH

1 of mitigation banking credits occurring before, on, or after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Hassan M. Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: May 9, 2005 |  | /s/HASSAN M. AHMEDHassan M. Ahmed Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### Samuel Glass *et al.,*plaintiffs in error, *vs.*George E. Clark, defendant in error.

A bill was filed against G. E. Clark and G. *'W.*Morgan, as tenants in common, to enjoin the erection of a mill-dam and to abate the same, -and the mill pond, as a nuisance. The injunction was'refused by the chancellor, and the bill is still pending. In the meantime, another bill was filed against Clark, individually, charging that the dam had been washed away, that complainants had agreed for value with the counsel for Clark, and by Clark’s authority, that a decree might be taken on the first bill, perpetually enjoining the defendants from erecting the dam ; that Clark was disregarding the said agreement, and was repairing and erecting the dam, and that Morgan had no"further interest in the mill, having sold to Clark. The last bill prayed for a specific performance of the contract with Clark, and in the meantime for an injunction against him. It appeared on the hearing of this second application for an injunction that Morgan’s interest in the property had been assigned as a homestead for his wife and children :

*Held,*that the chancellor was not in error in refusing the injunction, as Morgan was not a party, the more especially as the testimony was conflicting as to Clark being the sole owner.

Injunction. Party. Specific performance. Before Judge Clark. Sumter county. At Chambers. September 21st, 1874.

The facts of this case are sufficiently reported in the' above head-note.

R. F. Lyon ; Hawkins & Hawkins *;*Jack Brown, for plaintiffs in error.

N. A. Smith ; C. T. Goode, for defendant.

Trippe, Judge.

' The second bill was against Clark individually. The contract it seeks to enforce was made with Clark. That contract involved a disposition of the case made by the first bill to which Morgan was a party. Morgan had a right to. be heard ujbon the question as to his interest. .It furthermore appeared that Morgan’s interest in the property had been assigned as a *381homestead for his wife and children. The testimony was also conflicting upon the point as to Clark being the sole owner. Surely, a specific performance of a contract with Clark, and a decree under that contract restraining Morgan from the use of property in which the original bill charged he had an interest, and to which bill he was a party, could not be granted, unless .Morgan was a party to the proceedings in which such a decree was sought. Under this view, and more especially as there was contradictory testimony as to Clark’s having the title to the whole property, and that, too, without a right on the part of Morgan to be heard, we cannot say there was error in the refusal of the injunction prayed for.

Judgment affirmed.
# Red Bulls to Deploy to the Middle East

/ Published Feb. 6, 2024

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. - Family and friends of more than 550 Red Bull Soldiers gathered Feb. 1 for a departure ceremony honoring the Minnesota National Guard’s 34th Infantry Division “Red Bulls” and their upcoming deployment to the Middle East.

The Red Bulls will spend nearly 10 months away from their homes supporting Operation Spartan Shield. The unit will train in Texas before heading overseas.

The Red Bulls will take over for the California National Guard’s 40th Infantry Division, becoming Task Force Spartan, comprising active Army and National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve units. Through Operation Spartan Shield, Task Force Spartan maintains a U.S. military posture in Southwest Asia, strengthening defense relationships and partner capacity.

“You know that each and every day your warriors walk out the door, it’s a risk,” said Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. “But what I can assure you is, there is no better trained, better equipped, and better ready unit in the world to take on this mission than the 34th Infantry Division.”

Spanning 216 communities throughout Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, North Dakota, South Dakota, Virginia, Colorado, California, Florida, Louisiana, Maryland, New Jersey and Texas, the Red Bull Soldiers will make their way to Fort Cavazos, Texas, for a month of pre-mobilization training. They return home from the Middle East in December.

“Thank you to the families, friends, civilian employers and community members who have come here today to support their Citizen-Soldier,” said Army Maj. Gen. Charles Kemper, the 34th Infantry Division’s commanding general.

The Red Bulls previously deployed in support of Operation Spartan Shield in 2018-19. More than half of the service members deploying this year have previously deployed.

“This mission is well suited for the highly capable Citizen-Soldiers of the 34th Infantry Division. Our ranks contain teachers, engineers, police officers, doctors, lawyers, accountants, mechanics, and dozens of other professions,” said Kemper. “This diverse civilian skill set adds to our capability as an infantry division headquarters.”

Units supporting the Spartan Shield mission provide aviation, logistics, force protection and information management capabilities and facilitate theater security cooperation activities such as key leader engagements, joint exercises, conferences, symposia, humanitarian assistance, and disaster response planning.

Maj. Gen. Johanna Clyborne, the Minnesota National Guard’s assistant adjutant general for Army, offered some advice for the deploying Soldiers.

“Stay connected and make time to engage with your family; communication helps your family know that you are OK,” said Clyborne. “Remain flexible; it is not uncommon to have a change in your primary position. Deployments, they come with missions, but goals add to your personal growth and journey.”
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, HassanM. Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: August 2, 2007 |                                   |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ HASSAN M. AHMED                    |
|                      | Hassan M. Ahmed                        |
|                      | *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                      | *(Principal Executive Officer)*        |

 

----
### StormKlear EPA Case Study

Project: Morehead Road Improvements,

Cabarrus County, NC

Owner: NCDOT

Contractor: Granite Contracting LLC, Concord, NC

Product: StormKlear DPS Segmented Socks

Dose Rate: 5 mg/L

Description: This was a $4.2M TIV project awarded to Granite Contracting LLC, Concord, NC, in June 2010

to reconstruct Morehead Road to four lanes East of its current location. It also included a pedestrian

‐

vehicle overpass. Because of the exposed area and clay soils, turbidity posed potential problems during

normal rain events. StormKlear DPS Segmented Socks were installed directly on top of 8’ single net

excelsior matting in a channel; 12” x 10’ excelsior logs were used as check structures. The DBP

‐ 2100 was

installed just after the 1 st check, and the GelFloc after the 2 nd check; the 3 rd section was for settling and

additional filtration. Samples were then taken during a 1” rain event in early February 2011.

Results – Influent: 1195 NTU; After 3 rd Check w/ settling: 42 NTU

Residual Biopolymer Test: Negative
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of In Full Affect,  Inc., on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2002 as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Daniel L. Hodges, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 

22, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00245-CV

____________

IN RE ZAHIR QUERISHI, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 86707

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On March 8, 2012, relator Zahir Querishi filed a petition for writ of mandamus in 

this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code § 22.221 ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. In the petition, 

relator asks this court to order the respondent, Chris Daniel, Harris County District Clerk, 

to forward a copy of the order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus to relator.

This court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas 

Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the 

courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in the 

court of appeals’ district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals’ 
2

jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. Because the petition for writ of mandamus 

is directed toward a district clerk and is not necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction, 

we have no jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(b)(1).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Boyce.
gpre-20130331 Q1 Exhibit 10.2(e)



		

			 

		




		
			Exhibit 10.2(e)
		

		
			 
		

		
			REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE
		

			
					
						$35,000,000

					
					
						 

					
					
						April 26, 2013

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				



		
			FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  Green Plains Trade Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“GTRADE”), and each Person joined as a Borrower from time to time (each a “Borrower”, and collectively, the “Borrowers”), hereby promise to pay, jointly and severally, to the order of Bank of America (“Lender”), at the office of Agent (as defined below) at the address set forth in the Loan Agreement (as defined below) or at such other place as Agent may from time to time designate to any Borrower in writing: (i) at the end of the Term or (ii) earlier as provided in the Loan Agreement, the lesser of the principal sum of Thirty Five Million Dollars ($35,000,000) or such lesser sum which then represents such Lender’s Revolving Commitment Percentage of the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Revolving Advances made or extended to any Borrower by Lender pursuant to Section 2.1(a) of the Loan Agreement, in lawful money of the United States of America in immediately available funds, together with interest on the principal hereunder remaining unpaid form time to time, at the rate or rates from time to time in effect under the Loan Agreement.
		

		
			THIS REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE is pursuant to the terms of that certain Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of the date hereof (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”), by and among the Borrowers, the various financial institutions named therein or which hereafter become a party thereto as lenders and PNC Bank, National Association in its capacity as agent for Lenders (in such capacity, “Agent”) and in its capacity as a Lender.  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings provided in the Loan Agreement.
		

		
			 
		

		
			[Bank of America chose not to execute a Revolving Credit Note in reliance on the executed Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of the date hereof.]
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the Annual Report of Westell Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


/s/ E. Van Cullens
-----------------------------
E. Van Cullens
Chief Executive Officer
July 29, 2003

/s/ Nicholas C. Hindman
-----------------------------
Nicholas C. Hindman
Chief Financial Officer
July 29, 2003
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 99.2



                         SHELBOURNE PROPERTIES III, INC.

                  FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelbourne Properties III, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date: August 19, 2002                     /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                          ______________________
                                              Michael L. Ashner
                                              Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 19, 2002                     /s/ Carolyn Tiffany
                                          ______________________
                                              Carolyn Tiffany
                                              Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Shmuel Arvatz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd.
This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit accompanying such Report and shall not be deemed filed
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


Date: November 13, 2003               By:  /s/ Shmuel Arvatz
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name: Shmuel Arvatz
                                          Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


                                      -36-
## Williams , Rene e (OST) J)f)cU 4 /V)7^/^CTV^ f^ f5^ f Subject : FW : Chisan aEssentia l Ai r

Origina l Messag e From : joejean@gci.ne t [mailto:joejean@gci.net ] Sent : Thursday , Apri l 08 , 201 0 12:4 4 PM To : Little , Cynthi a M(DOT ) Subject : Chisan a Essentia l Ai r Cindi e Littl e DOT&P F Dea r Ms . Little , Than k yo u fo r th e opportunit yt o voic e m ysuppor t t o retai nChisan a i nth e Essentia l Ai r Servic e Program . Regardles s o f size , mos t outlyin g Alaska ncommunitie s ar e dependen t upo n thi s service . Chisan a i s especiall ydependen t sinc e ther e i s n o wate r acces s andonl ylimite d overlandaccess , vi a snowmachine , durin g a fe wo f th e winte r months . Becaus e i t i s a Wrangel l

- St . Elia s Nationa l Preserv e inholding , ther e i s n o chanc e o f improvin g tha t access . Th e resident s themselve s provid e th e runwaywinte r maintenanc e whic hallow s fo r th e us e o f whee l rathe r tha nsk i planes . Th e program

provide s th e mean s fo r th e communit yt o surviv e andi s vita l t o th e familie s tha t liv e there . Than k you r fo r you r consideration . DosephM . Smit h Bo x3435 3 Duneau , Alask a 9980 3
**Exhibit 13.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F ofPerusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk.(the “Company”) for the yearly period endedDecember 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Arwin Rasyid, President Director of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge:          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Arwin Rasyid           Name: Arwin Rasyid Title:    President DirectorDate: July 14, 2005
Attachment 5 

References 

1) Department of Defense Instruction 6400.09, “DoD Policy on Integrated Primary 

Prevention of Self-Directed Harm and Prohibited Abuse or Harm,” 11 September 

2020 

2) Department of Defense Instruction 1020.03, “Harassment Prevention and Response 

in the Armed Forces,” 29 December 2020 

3) Public Law 117-81, “Sec 549B. Primary prevention workforce,” 27 December 2021 

4) NGB Memorandum, “Integrated Prevention Workforce Implementation Guidance,” 

28 April 2022 

5) USECDEF Memorandum, “Execution of the Department of Defense Prevention Plan 

of Action 2.0 (2022-2024),” 27 May 2022 

6) Department of Defense Instruction 6400.11, “DoD Integrated Primary Prevention 

Policy for Prevention Workforce and Leaders,” Change 1, 20 December 2022, 

Effective 4 April 2023 

7) USECDEF Memo, “Actions to Address and Prevent Sexual Assault and Sexual 

Harassment in the Military”, 04 April 2023