alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of slabsdirect.com, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  March  31,  2004 as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  date  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)   The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

August 25, 2004               By: /s/ Steven Bruk
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Steven Bruk
                                  President, Principal Executive
                                  Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
                                  Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Forgotten  Investments
Company, Inc., on Form 10- QSB for the period ending September 30, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  Daniel L.  Hodges,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF

VYYO INC.



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vyyo Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Davidi Gilo, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Arik Levi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of his knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Davidi Gilo        
|Davidi Gilo            
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 14, 2005      
|                       
|/s/ Arik Levi          
|Arik Levi              
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2005
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3807 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an incentive for 

expanding employment in rural areas by allowing employers the work 

opportunity credit for hiring residents of rural areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 14, 2009 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an incentive for expanding employment in rural areas 

by allowing employers the work opportunity credit for 

hiring residents of rural areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Economic Stimulus 

5 for Rural Communities Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3807 IH

1 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT TO APPLY TO NEW 

2 EMPLOYEES WHO ARE RESIDENTS OF RURAL 

3 AREAS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining members of 

6 targeted groups) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end 

7 of subparagraph (H), by striking the period at the end 

8 of subparagraph (I) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding 

9 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(J) a rural area resident.’’ 

11 (b) RURAL AREA RESIDENT.—Subsection (d) of sec12 tion 51 of such Code is amended by redesignating para13 graphs (11) through (13) as paragraphs (12) through 

14 (14), respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (10) 

15 the following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(11) RURAL AREA RESIDENT.— 

17 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘rural area 

18 resident’ means, with respect to any period, any 

19 employee of the employer if— 

20 ‘‘(i) substantially all of the services 

21 performed during such period by such em22 ployee for such employer are performed 

23 within an area determined by the Secretary 

24 of Agriculture to be a rural area, and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3807 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) the principal place of abode of 

2 such employee while performing such serv3 ices is within such an area. 

4 ‘‘(B) TERMINATION.—Such term shall not 

5 include any individual who begins work for the 

6 employer after the date which is 5 years after 

7 the date of the enactment of this paragraph.’’. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

10 the employer after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1120

In Re: J. HAROLD SMITH, 

 Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(8:85-cr-00166-GRA-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 28, 2009 

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

J. Harold Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

J. Harold Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus 

seeking an order compelling the district court to rule on his 

motion and seeking recusal of the district court judge. 

Our review of the district court’s docket sheet 

reveals that the court has ruled on Smith’s motion. 

Accordingly, because the district court recently decided Smith’s 

case, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3638 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3638

            For the relief of Jorge-Alonso Chehade-Zegarra.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 2009

Mr. McDermott introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            For the relief of Jorge-Alonso Chehade-Zegarra.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JORGE-ALONSO CHEHADE-ZEGARRA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Jorge-Alonso Chehade-
Zegarra shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Jorge-Alonso Chehade-Zegarra enters 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Jorge-Alonso Chehade-Zegarra, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Jorge-Alonso 
Chehade-Zegarra shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3228 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase the knowledge 

and skills of principals and school leaders regarding early childhood education. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2021 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. ROMNEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase 

the knowledge and skills of principals and school leaders 

regarding early childhood education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Creating Early Child5 hood Leaders Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. 

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) Since principals and school leaders have the 

9 second largest in-school impact on student achieveVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:10 Nov 19, 2021 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3228.IS S3228

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3228 IS

1 ment (after teachers), a principal or school leader’s 

2 knowledge has a substantial impact on the teachers 

3 and students under the principal or school leader’s 

4 supervision. 

5 (2) Principals and school leaders are increas6 ingly being asked to supervise teachers and children 

7 in pre-kindergarten programs, yet school leaders 

8 often do not have training in early childhood edu9 cation. 

10 (3) Given the critical development that occurs 

11 in a child’s early life and the impacts of this develop12 mental period on later life outcomes, understanding 

13 the standards of early childhood education is par14 ticularly important. 

15 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to ensure 

16 that principals and school leaders are able to effectively 

17 support teachers in providing pre-kindergarten students 

18 with developmentally appropriate instruction. 

19 SEC. 3. SCHOOL LEADER TRAINING REGARDING EARLY 

20 CHILDHOOD EDUCATION. 

21 Section 202(f)(1)(B) of the Higher Education Act of 

22 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1022a(f)(1)(B)) is amended— 

23 (1) by striking clause (v) and inserting the fol24 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3228 IS

1 ‘‘(v) engage and involve parents, com2 munity members, the local educational 

3 agency, businesses, providers of early child4 hood education programs, and other com5 munity leaders, to leverage additional re6 sources to improve student academic 

7 achievement;’’; 

8 (2) in clause (vi), by striking the period at the 

9 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(vii) understand child development, 

12 social and emotional development, develop13 mentally appropriate behavioral interven14 tions and supports, and effective instruc15 tional leadership skills for children from 

16 birth through age 8, in order to effectively 

17 manage and support developmentally ap18 propriate early childhood education pro19 grams.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) EG&G Defense Materials, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. DACA87-89-C-0076 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60276
Terry L. Elling, Esq. Elizabeth N. Jochum, Esq.

Holland & Knight LLP Tysons Comer, VA Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Travis P. Sommer, JA

Trial Attorney SUMMARY BINDING DECISION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WILSON By ADR agreement approved by the Board on 6 April 2016, the parties requested that this appeal be decided by a "bench decision" at the conclusion ofthe ADR proceeding. This summary decision will only address the reasonableness and allowability ofappellant's compensation cost at issue in this appeal. The parties had also requestedthat the Board address whetherthe government's claim for contract years 2004 and 2005 is barred by the applicable statute oflimitations. However, at the hearing, appellant concededthat the statute oflimitations was not applicable in the instant appeal (tr. 1/9). This decision has no value as precedent, cannotbe cited in any other proceeding and cannot be appealed. Itmay not be set aside except for fraud. DECISION The Board finds that appellant's compensation costs for contract years,2004 and 2005 are reasonable and allowable. Accordingly, the appeal is sustained. Dated: 10 May 2016

OWEN C. WILSON Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 60276, Appeal ofEG&G Defense Materials, Inc., rendered in conformancewiththe Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of TS Electronics,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), I, Keith P. Boyd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 9, 2005
                                                     /S/ KEITH P. BOYD
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Keith P. Boyd
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


         The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Precision Standard, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 58205 

) 

Under Contract No. SPM4A7-08-M-9187 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Nancy M. Camardo, Esq. 

Kevin M. Cox, Esq. 

Camardo Law Firm, P.C. 

Auburn, NY 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq. 

DLA Chief Trial Attorney 

Edward R. Murray, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

DLA Aviation 

Richmond, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The disputes which are the subject of the appeal having been settled, the appeal is 

hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement is 

not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within 90 days 

of the date of this Order. 

Dated: 2 December 2016 ~/ i:J~ L~O'SULLIVAN Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58205, Appeal of Precision Standard, 

Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7516

WAYNE STEVEN EVANS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EARL BESHEARS, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA94-2407-WN)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Steven Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to

appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Evans v. Beshears, No. CA-94-2407-WN (D. Md. Aug. 21, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 99.2



                          SHELBOURNE PROPERTIES II, INC.

                  FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelbourne Properties II, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date: August 19, 2002                     /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                          ______________________
                                              Michael L. Ashner
                                              Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 19, 2002                     /s/ Carolyn Tiffany
                                          ______________________
                                              Carolyn Tiffany
                                              Chief Financial Officer
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 1/6/97

TENTH CIRCUIT

EUGENE T. FOUST,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

MARY ANN JOHNSON FOUST, and

MARGARET ANN JOHNSON, an alleged

deprived child,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY; ORAL

ROBERTS; RICHARD ROBERTS; CLARENCE

BOYD; MICHAEL YOAKUM; SCOTT SMITH;

GARY L. GIBSON; LARRY JOHNSON; and

GINA M. CHOROST,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-5046

(D.C. No. 92-C-909-C)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY, EBEL and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Mr. Foust is a pro se civil litigant. Mr. Foust filed this action and appealed

an adverse decision granting defendants summary judgment. We affirmed in an

unpublished decision. See Foust v. Oral Roberts University, No. 93-5169 (10th

Cir. Apr. 5, 1994).

Mr. Foust then returned to district court and filed a motion to remand this

case to the state court system. The district court denied the motion, and Mr. Foust

now appeals.

The law of the case bars this appeal. The decision of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

WADE BRORBY

United States Circuit Judge
#### In the Matter of Joseph Hayden et al., Respondents, v Thomas Tallman, as Trustee of Village of Hamburg, et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[773 NYS2d 723]

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Edward A. Rath, Jr., J.), entered November 12, 2002. The order denied respondents’ motion for leave to reopen and renew a hearing.

It is hereby ordered that said appeals be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed without costs *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.