alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1989-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement  of  operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,317
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  420,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               421,583
<PP&E>                                         8,460,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,838,964)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,106,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,350
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,953,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,106,437
<SALES>                                        268,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               268,262
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  175,235<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                45,553
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            45,553
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   45,553
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


We, James Crigler and Byron Hudson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of American Pallet Leasing, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents
in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
American Pallet Leasing, Inc.




         By:   /s/ James Crigler
               -------------------------------
               James Crigler, Chief Executive Officer


         By:   s/ Byron Hudson
               -------------------------------
               Byron Hudson, Chief Financial Officer


Dated: November 21, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2657 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2657

 To amend the Small Business Act to define the term ``State'' for the 
 purposes of the microloan program carried out under that Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 2021

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Small Business Act to define the term ``State'' for the 
 purposes of the microloan program carried out under that Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Northern Mariana Islands 
Entrepreneurship Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. MICROLOAN PROGRAM DEFINITIONS.

    Section 7(m)(11) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)(11)) 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking ``and'' at the 
        end;
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(E) the term `State' means each of the several 
                States of the United States, the District of Columbia, 
                the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States 
                Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
                Mariana Islands, and American Samoa.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Social Security Administration

          - [Docket No. SSA-2014-0053]

# AGENCY:

Social Security Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Social Security Ruling; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Social Security Administration published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 18, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015-05680, on page 14217, in the first column, in section “D,” in the second sentence, delete “and dimethyl sulfoxide”.                    

Faye I. Lipsky,

Director, Office of Regulations and Reports Clearance Social Security Administration.

[FR Doc. 2015-08136 Filed 4-8-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20496-20497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08906]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. and its 
Continuation on Thursday, April 23, 2015 at the Conclusion of the Open 
Meeting.

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109 
(formerly 2 U.S.C. 437g). Matters concerning participation in civil 
actions or proceedings or arbitration. Information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse 
effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.
* * * * *

[[Page 20497]]


PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-08906 Filed 4-14-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit
32.1
 Chief
Executive and Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18U.S.C.,SECTION
1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
undersigned President and Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Global Immune
Technologies Inc., (the “Company”), herby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Dated
      February 6, 2009
                
                /s/ Donald PerksCEO
      and CFO
Exhibit 10.2

ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN  RICHARD G. LUBIC AND USA BROADBAND, INC.

This
Management Service Agreement is by and between DL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Nevada corporation ("DL"), and USA BROADBAND, INC., a Delaware corporation
("USA"), and is an Addendum to the Employment Agreement dated January 17, 2003 by and between RICHARD G. LUBIC ("LUBIC") and USA BROADBAND, INC., a Delaware corporation ("USA") and its
various subsidiaries currently existing or to be formed including Cable California SA de CV, a Mexican corporation.

LUBIC
shall also be appointed as Chairman of the Board of Directors of USA.

A
copy of the Employment Agreement between USA and LUBIC is attached.

This
Agreement for services of LUBIC shall be for a period of three (3) years with all compensation for said Management Services (Employment Agreement) to be paid to:



($250,000
per annum payable twice monthly on the 1st and 15th day of the month @ $10,417.00 twice for a total management payment of $20,833.33 per month).

Note:
Any services performed by Lubic prior to the funding of USA in an amount of no less than $1 million shall be compensated by payment to DL Communications, Inc. of the sum of
$2,500 per day, plus any [illegible] business expenses.

Payment
shall commence upon USA receiving additional funding in an amount of no less than $1 million.

Dated
this 12th day February, 2003.

|DL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
a Nevada corporation |  | USA BROADBAND, INC.,
a Delaware corporation
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|By:                                           |  | /s/RICHARD G. LUBIC                        
|                                              |  | Richard G. Lubic                           

---

QuickLinks
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 7 -00667 -CR

M ar ti n Tor r e s , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-04 -10 0229 , HO NORAB LE WI LF ORD F LOW ERS , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Ap pe lla nt’ s c ourt -a

pp ointe d att or

ne y fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ingthat th e a pp e a l is frivolous and without merit. The brief mee ts the require ments of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1 9 6 7 ) , b y p r e s e n ti n g a p r o f e s s io n a l e v a lu a ti o n o f th e r e c o r d d e mo n s tr a ti n g w h y th ere are no
ar guable g rounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); H i g h v . Stat e , 57 3 S. W.2 d 8 07 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 48 5 S.W. 2d 55 3 (T e x. Cr im. App . 1 97 2) ; Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)
. Appellant rec eived a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate r ecor d and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed. We have r eviewe d the re cord a nd counsel’s br ief a

nd ag ree that the a

p p e a l is frivolous
and wi tho ut m e ri t. We fi nd no thi ngin t

he re c or d th a t mi g ht a

rgua bly su pp or t th e a pp e a l.2

Se e Bl e ds oev . S

tate , 17 8 S .W .3 d 8 24 , 8 26 -2 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 05 ). Couns e l’ s mo tio n to withdraw is g rante d.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and He nson Affir med Filed: Jul y

31, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08260]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Chatter Box Call Center Ltd., Euro Group of 
Companies, Inc., and Golden Century Resources Limited; Order of 
Suspension of Trading

April 7, 2015.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Chatter Box Call Center Ltd. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended December 31, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Euro Group of Companies, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended June 30, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Golden Century Resources Limited because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended March 31, 2012.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended 
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 7, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. 
EDT on April 20, 2015.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08260 Filed 4-7-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# Alaska, Mongolia State Partnership Program medal designated, retroactively awarded

/ Published Dec. 6, 2011

CAMP DENALI, Alaska - Alaska Guard members are now eligible for the State Partnership Program Ribbon as a result of a successful partnership with the Republic of Mongolia through the National Guard State Partnership Program.

"In order for Soldiers or Airmen of the Alaska National Guard to receive the ribbon, they must have deployed to the Republic of Mongolia or any other country with a Mongolian delegation in support of the SPP for a period of at least seven days including travel," said Army Maj. Wayne Don, the director of the Alaska State Partnership Program.

The Alaska National Guard SPPR is divided into three vertical sections of blue, gold and red, representing the significance of the partnership between Alaska and the Republic of Mongolia by representing the colors of each of their flags.

The blue represents the eternal skies expanding above both nations, the red symbolizes progress and prosperity and the gold signifies wealth.

"Soldiers and Airmen of the Alaska National Guard who meet the criteria to receive a ribbon, may be retroactively awarded," Don said. "We have been authorized to award the ribbon for service all the way back to September 2003, when the State Partnership Program began."

He added that Alaska National Guard members who traveled and participated in exercises in Mongolia are eligible to receive the ribbon because they have played an integral role in developing the relationship between the sister countries.

"To receive the ribbon retroactively, Soldiers and Airmen will need to provide documentation of their mission and trip," Don said.

"Orders, a manifest or roster, an agenda for the event that covers seven days would be the kinds of documentation we need to approve the award," he said. I'm hoping that we are able to award as many eligible Soldiers and Airmen the ribbon as possible. They've done the work and helped to make the State Partnership Program a success and deserve to get the ribbon."
22571

#### Elizabeth Ann SLATTON, Respondent v. John Calvin SLATTON, III, Appellant.

(345 S. E. (2d) 248)

Supreme Court

*129*Richard H. Warder*of *Warder and Steele,*Greenville, *for appellant.*

*O. W. Bannister, Jr.*of *Hill, Wyatt and Bannister,*Green-ville, *for respondent.*

Submitted Feb. 13, 1986.

Decided June 16, 1986.

*Per Curiam:*

This appeal is from a provision in the parties’ divorce decree requiring appellant husband to transfer possession and deliver title to a 1978 Gran Prix automobile to respondent wife. We reverse and remand.

Before wife filed petition for divorce in this case, husband transferred title to the automobile to his mother, Grace Slatton. Mrs. Slatton appeared as a witness at the final hearing in this matter but was not made a party to the action.

First, husband contends the family court was without subject matter jurisdiction to order disposition of the automobile because neither spouse held title to the automobile at the time the petition for divorce was filed. We disagree.

S. C. Code Ann. § 20-7-420(2) (1976) vests jurisdiction in the family court to settle the parties’ legal and equitable rights “to the real and personal property of the marriage.” The family court clearly had subject matter jurisdiction to determine whether the automobile was marital property and to determine the parties’ equitable rights therein.

Husband next asserts that Grace Slatton, titleholder to the automobile, was entitled to the opportunity to appear as a litigant and to offer evidence to protect *130her property interest. *Jeffords v. Hall,*276 S. C. 271, 277 S. E. (2d) 703 (1981). While this assertion is correct, Grace Slatton has not sought relief in her own behalf. This Court, however, will remand for a necessary party to be brought into an action even when that party has not requested relief. *See Midland Timber Co. v. Prettyman & Sons,*93 S. C. 13, 75 S. E. 1012 (1912).

A necessary party is one whose rights must be ascertained and settled before the rights of the parties to the action can be determined. *Simon v. Strock,*209 S. C. 134, 39 S. E. (2d) 209 (1946). It is mandatory that a necessary party be brought into the action. *Schroder v. Antipas,*214 S. C. 87, 51 S. E. (2d) 365 (1949); S. C. Code Ann. § 15-5-200 (1976).1 Because the evidence indicates Grace Slatton has a property interest in the automobile, we find she is a necessary party to this action.

Accordingly, we reverse the family court’s order requiring appellant husband to transfer possession and deliver title to the automobile. This matter is remanded to the family court to bring in Grace Slatton as a party and afford her the opportunity to appear as a litigant. See S. C. Code Ann. § 20-7-420(19) (1976).

Reversed and remanded.

1

 After the trial of this action, S. C. Code Ann. § 15-5-200 (1976) was repealed by Act No. 100 of 1985. See Rule 19, SCRCP.
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0082 Directorate ID : 2010 - SW - 036 - AD Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Model 412 and 412EP Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 115 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : This proposal is prompted by analysis of the high aft crosstube assemblies conducted as a result of recent field failures and corrosion problems of the affected crosstube assemblies. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 9,315 Labor per Helicopter ( 11 x $ 8 5 /work- hour) $ 935 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ Total US Fleet Cost $ 

### 79,030 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Pro cedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) 

### Project Engineer : Michael Kohner
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES EDWARD FARLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR94-321, CA-97-464-S)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Farley, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Farley, Nos. CR-94-321, CA-97-464-S (D. Md.

Feb. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40938 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ADOLFO GARCIA-BADILLO, also known as Guillermo Quintero-Valli Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-852-1 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adolfo Garcia-Badillo has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garcia-Badillo has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 19, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk