alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and statement of income found on pages F-2 & F-3 of
the company's Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 1996 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          40,138
<SECURITIES>                                    32,467
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,912
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,559
<PP&E>                                           7,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,432
<BONDS>                                         74,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,349
<SALES>                                         33,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,158
<CGS>                                           12,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,492)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,879
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54





</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08325]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9020-4]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible: Office of Federal Activities, General Information 
(202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 03/30/2015 Through 04/03/2015
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20150092, Final EIS, BOP, KS, Leavenworth Federal Correctional 
Institution and Federal Prison Camp, Review Period Ends: 05/11/2015, 
Contact: Issac Gaston 202-514-6470.
EIS No. 20150093, Draft EIS, FERC, CA, Hydropower Licenses--Merced 
River Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2179-043) and Merced Falls 
Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2467-020), Comment Period Ends: 05/29/
2015, Contact: Matt Buhyoff 202-502-6824.
EIS No. 20150094, Final EIS, FERC, AL, Martin Dam Hydroelectric 
Project, FERC Project No. 349-173, Review Period Ends: 05/11/2015, 
Contact: Stephen Bowler 202-502-6861.
EIS No. 20150095, Draft EIS, FTA, WA, Federal Way Link Extension, 
Comment Period Ends: 05/26/2015, Contact: James Saxton 206-220-7954.
EIS No. 20150096, Draft EIS, NPS, HI, Kalaupapa National Historical 
Park Draft General Management Plan, Comment Period Ends: 06/08/2015, 
Contact: Erika Stein Espaniola 808-567-6802.
EIS No. 20150097, Second Final Supplement, USFS, UT, Ogden Ranger 
District Travel Plan Revision, Review Period Ends: 05/14/2015, Contact: 
Sendi Kalcic 435-755-3633.
EIS No. 20150098, Draft EIS, USMC, DC, Multiple Projects in Support of 
Marine Barracks in Washington, DC, Comment Period Ends: 05/26/2015, 
Contact: Katherine Childs 202-685-0164.
EIS No. 20150099, Final Supplement, BR, ND, Northwest Area Water Supply 
Project, Review Period Ends: 05/11/2015, Contact: Alicia Waters 701-
221-1206.
EIS No. 20150100, Final EIS, AFS, WA, Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National 
Forest Invasive Plant Treatment, Review Period Ends: 05/26/2015, 
Contact: Phyllis Reed 360-436-2332.
EIS No. 20150101, Final EIS, BLM, CO, Grand Junction Field Office 
Proposed Resource Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 05/11/2015, 
Contact: Christina Stark 970-244-3027.
EIS No. 20150102, Draft EIS, USACE, OH, Western Lake Erie Basin, 
Blanchard River Watershed Study, Comment Period Ends: 05/26/2015, 
Contact: Michael Pniewski 1-888-833-6390.

    Dated: April 7, 2015.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2015-08325 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Xinhua Wu,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Basic Empire  Corporation  and will be retained by Basic Empire
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                                   Date: November 13, 2007

                                                    By:  /s/ Xinhua Wu
                                                         -------------
                                                             Xinhua Wu
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### Streeter vs. Frank.

Justice’s Cotjet — Process.—Whenever the statute prescribes a form for any writ, that form must be strictly followed, especially by justices of the peace.'

(4 Chand., 93.)

ERROR to the County Court for *Jefferson*County.

*Frank*brought an action of replevin against *Streeter*for the wrongful taking and detention of certain personal property, and *Streeter*who was a constable, justified such taking and detention under an execution issued on a judgment rendered in justice’s court against *Frank*and in favor of one Cole, and in his hands as such officer.

*387After the plaintiff had rested his case the defendant offered in evidence the execution upon which he relied, and it appeared that the words found in the statutory form “ excepting such as the law exempts,” were omitted from the execution. The plaintiff’s evidence showed that the property seized was claimed by him as exempt, and tended to show that it was exempt."

The plaintiff objected to the execution on account of the omission of the words “ excepting such as the law exempts,” and the court sustained the objection. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment, and the defendant sued out a writ of error.

*T. & J.*Prentiss, for plaintiff in error,

argued that the statute gives no form for executions issued from courts of record, and is merely directory in giving the form of a justice’s execution ; it does not say that it *shall be*in that form, but that it *may be.*R. ;S., ch. 88, § 190. A substantial compliance with what the law directs in an execution is all that is necessary. 2 Ala., 68; U. S. Digest, 741, § 69; Rev. Stat., ch. 100, § 19.

*Mall & Newhall,*for defendant in error,

argued that the execution was not good; that it must follow the statute except as to verbal and literal variances, and if it materially vary from the forms, prescribed by statute, it will not protect the officer. 1 U. S. Dig., 10, § 285 ; 2 id., 815, § 2; 10 Mass., *856; 8*id., 198 ; 11 id., 276 ; Oowen & Hill’s Notes, 1007-8 ; Ohitty Con., 693 ; R. S., ch. 88, § 187-9.

Larrabee, J.

"We affirm this judgment on the sole ground that the execution under which the defendant *Streeter*justified, was not in conformity with the statute. Whenever the statute prescribes a form for any writ, that form must be strictly followed, and certainly by justices of the peace. We do not decide any other point in the cause.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vapor Fuel Technologies, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September  30, 2003, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, C. Thomas Davis,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ C. Thomas Davis
C. Thomas Davis
Chief Executive Officer
January 13, 2004



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Timothy G. Conley, as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 15, 2004



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ TIMOTHY G. CONLEY                                
|Timothy G. Conley                                    
|Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer



This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
[Present, Chancellors Rutledge, Marshall and James.}

MAY, 1803.

#### Francis Henderson and Wife, and the Trustees for his Wife, *vs.*Henry Laurens, Executor of Henry Laurens, deceased.

Interest on legacy decreed to be paid at 5 per cent, according to the will ofthe testator, till the time ofthe payment fixed by the will. After that at *7*per cent, according to the interest of the country.

The principal ofthe legacy not to be raised till the further order of the Court.

*4002*per annum to be paid to complainants wife according to deed of separation. And if a further provision of 3001. per annum should fail in England, the same to he paid out of the estate here.

THE bill was filed by complainants for the recovery of a legacy bequeathed by Henry Laurens (formerly president of Congress) to his grand daughter, Frances Lau-rens, the only child of his eldest son, Col. John Laurens, deceased. He directed that the legacy should be paid her, on attaining 21 years, or day of marriage; and should bear an interest of five per cent.

She bas attained 21 years of age; and also married the complainant, Francis Henderson, from whom she has since been separated by a deed mutually entered into, by which it was stipulated that the sum of 400/. sterling should be secured to her annually. The bill was to procure the payment of the legacy above mentioned.

The cause was argued, and Chancellor Rutledge delivered the decree of the Court.

It is ordered that it be referred to the master to state an<l settle the arrears of interest due to complainants wife, when she became entitled to her legacy, under the will of her grand father; calculating interest at the rate of 5 per cent, agreeable to his will, to that time. That be do allow If per cent, interest on the principal of the legacy from the time it became due; and *7*per cent, also on the arrears of the annual interest. That so much of the annual interest *171of the legacy as shall be sufficient to make .up the sum of 400/. per' annum, agreed to be secured to the complainant’s wife by the deed of separation, shall be remitted to her in half yearly payments by defendant; and the remainder of the interest accruing annually on the legacy, shall be paid by defendant to complainant, Francis Píen- ^ r derson. If the funds m England, which secures to complainant’s wife the sum of 300/. per annum, shall at any time fail to produce that sum, it shall be made good out of the estate of complainant in this country. That the testator having expressly charged the estate devised by him to the defendant with payment of the legacies contained in his will, and it not being necessary at present to raise the principal of the legacy bequeathed to complainant’s wife, the court will not now direct it to be done; but if the defendant shall fail to comply with the foregoing^ order, as is therein directed, the complainants may apply by petition to the court, in which case, if it shall be expedient, the defendant will then be ordered to raise the said legacy forthwith. The costs to be paid by the defendant.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Michael S. Liss, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 9, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 67 (Wednesday, April 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds--Change in State of 
Incorporation Arch Reinsurance Company

AGENCY: Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Fiscal Service Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 5 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2014 Revision, published July 1, 2014, at 79 FR 37398.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that Arch Reinsurance 
Company (NAIC#10348) has redomesticated from the state of Nebraska to 
the state of Delaware effective September 15, 2014. Federal bond-
approving officials should annotate their reference copies of the 
Treasury Department Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2014 Revision, to 
reflect this change.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/suretyBnd/surety_home.htm.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Surety Bond 
Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6D22, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: March 11, 2015.
Kevin McIntyre,
Manager, Financial Accounting and Services Branch, Bureau of the Fiscal 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-08048 Filed 4-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
#### DOWNER, Complainant, Appellant, *vs.*STAINES, Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL nr EQTJITX PROM THE LANE CHtOUIT COURT.

The illegibility of a bill of complaint is not a canse of demurrer. The proper remedy is to move to strike the bill from the flies.

DemubbeR to a bill of complaint on tbe ground that the bill was illegible. The demurrer was sustained, the bill dismissed, and the complainant appealed.

*By the*Court,

Whitoít, O. J.

The sole cause of demurrer to the bill of complaint is, that it is illegible. We do not think this a ground of demurrer. If the fact alleged as a cause of demurrer exists, the defendant should have moved in the court below to strike the bill from the files.
March 24 , 2015

Mr. Marc Parmelee

19409 Leisure Lane

Lago Vista, TX 78645

Dear Mr. Parmelee :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your Feb ruary 3 , 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 029 5 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR fr om which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to proces s your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure