^^M 
Departments of the Army and the Air Force 

National Guard Bureau 

Washington 25, D. C, 30 June I960 

To THE SECRETARIES OF THE ARMY AND AIR FORCE: 

The Annual Report of the Chief, National Guard Bureau, for the fiscal year ending 30 

June 1960, is respectfully submitted. 

Twenty years ago the German armed forces had overwhelmed half of Europe; and our 

relations with Japan were worsening. In this uneasy world situation, the President saw fit to 

order our National Guard units into active duty, ostensibly for a year of training. Many in 

the National Guard recognized early at that time that a world conflict was probable, and they 

prepared for the war which was to postpone their return to civilian life until a bloody worldwide conflict had ended. 

The transformation of the National Guard in the past twenty years has been as revolutionary as the changes in the weapons systems. The Army National Guard and Air National 

Guard organization in each of the fifty states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia has 

kept pace-with the missions and requirements of the Active Army and Active Air Force. We 

are able to report continuation and substantial expansion of the mission which the National 

Guard is performing for the active services, as well as substantial progress toward the goals 

of maximum mobilization readiness. Yet, the six keys to this progress have remained the 

same: Strength—Training—Officer Standards—Facilities—Equipment—and Technicians. 

Progress, rather than change, is the theme of this report. The status of the National Guard 

at the close of the fiscal year is shown broadly at the beginning. The body of the report, in 

illustrated narrative, contains a more detailed accounting. The appendixes provide statistics 

and tabulated data, including State obligations of Federal funds appropriated for the National 

Guard by the Congress of the United States. 

The progress reflected in this report was possible only with the assistance and cooperation 

of all individuals, staffs, and agencies concerned: The President and Congress of the United 

States; the Departments of Defense, Army and Air Force; and the Governors and military 

departments of the several States, Puerto Rico, and District of Columbia. Their support is 

acknowledged with appreciation. 

Also acknowledged are the great scientific and technological advances which serve to 

strengthen our national defense structure. But man remains the ultimate weapon. The progress of the National Guard from the muskets of 1636 to the mortars of 1940 to the missiles 

of 1960 has been possible only by reason of the personal sacrifices and devoted efforts of the 

individual members of the National Guard—civilians in peace and soldiers in war, through 

the years the custodians of our country's security and honor. 
Major General DONALD W. MCGOWAN 

Chief, National Guard Bureau 

Major General WINSTON P. WILSON 

Deputy Chief, National Guard Bureau 

and Assistant Chief for Air National Guard 

Major General CLAYTON P. KERR 

Assistant Chief for Army National Guard 
ft ANNUAL REPORT ft 

OF THE 

CHIEF, NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 

FISCAL YEAR I960 

YOUR NATIONAL GUARD 

"AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE FIRST LINE DEFENSES' 

ON LAND 

IN THE AIR 

GUARDING THE NATION 

REPORTS CONTROL SYMBOL CONG- 1011 
CONTENTS 

Page 

Part I—The Big Picture 5 

Personnel 6 

Organization 7 

Training g 

Equipment 9 

Facilities 10 

Part II—Mission, Organization & Administration. . . 11 

Mission 11 

Organization 12 

Management 13 

Legislation 15 

Information and Recruiting 17 

Trophies and Awards 20 

Regulations 20 

State Emergencies 21 

Army-Air Force Support 23 

Part III—Army National Guard 25 

Comptroller 26 

Appropriations 26 

Funding 26 

Obligations 26 

Adjustments 26 

Technicians 27 

Finance 27 

Reports Control 27 

Personnel 28 

Strength 28 

Procurement 29 

Personnel Actions 29 

Six Months Training Input 29 

Reserve Officers Personnel Act 29 

State Strength 30 

National Guard Register 32 

Pay Grades E8 and E9 32 

Medical 32 

Personnel 32 

Units 32 

Examinations 32 

Reports of Investigation 33 

Civilian Medical Care 33 

Miscellaneous 33 

Organization and Training 33 

Units 33 

Special Forces 33 

Air Defense 34 

Training Criteria 34 

Combat Training 35 

Armory Training 36 

Field Training 36 

Annual Inspections 37 

School Program 37 

A viation 38 

Arm\ Advisors 38 

Types of ARNG Aircraft 39 

Logistics 40 

Equipment 40 

Excess Property 41 

Maintenance 42 

Maintenance and Operating Supplies 42 

Installations 43 

Construction Requirements 43 

State Matching Funds 44 

Armory Construction Obligations 44 

Non-Armory Construction 44 

Real Property 44 

Page 

Repairs and Utilities 45 

Field Training Installations 45 

Army Area Conferences 45 

Part IV—Air National Guard 46 

Foreword 46 

Comptroller 47 

Personnel 47 

Strength 47 

Procurement 48 

Air Technicians 48 

Proficiency Testing 48 

Officer Promotions 49 

Officer Effectiveness Reports 49 

Warrant Officer Positions 49 

Promotion to Pay-Grade E-8 49 

Retirement Records 49 

Medical 50 

Organization 50 

New Units Proposed 51 

Advisors 51 

C-II9 Modification 51 

Manning Revisions 51 

Nuclear Program 52 

Medical Seminar 52 

Operations and Training 52 

Organization 52 

Communications Unit Changes 53 

Training (General) • 54 

Air Base Training 54 

Field Training 54 

School Training 55 

Supplemental Training 55 

Operational Readiness 56 

Flying Hours 56 

Flying Safety 56 

Joint Exercises 57 

Air Defense Alert 57 

Firepower Exercises 57 

Tactical Reconnaisance 57 

Wide Awake 58 

Materiel 58 

Supply 58 

Aircraft Inventory 59 

Vehicles 59 

Aircraft Maintenance 59 

Budget and Requirements 60 

Civil Engineering 60 

New Construction 61 

Major Repair and Modification 61 

Maintenance and Operations 61 

Navigational Aids and Traffic Control 61 

Control Tower Structures 62 

Present Facilities 62 

Appendixes: 

A. Chiefs—National Guard Bureau & 

Predecessor Orgs 65 

B. State Adjutants General 65 

C. U. S. Property & Fiscal Officers 66 

D. Officers on Duty in the N. G. B 66 

E. Trophies and Awards 68 

F. Regulations 70 

G. Special Air Guard Projects 74 

H. Air Nat'l Guard Force Structure 74 

I. Air Nat'l Guard Personnel Charts 75 

J. Army Nat'l Guard—Obligations 

K. Air Nat'l Guard—Obligations 
THE BIG PICTURE 

The "Guard" Dollar 

OPERATIONAL MISSIONS MOBILIZATION TRAINING STATE SERVICE 

^A. J^fl BC--

/4riwy National Guard 

$151,760,000 

235,801,000 

23,219,000 

$410,780,000 

Operations & Maintenance 

Personnel 

Facilities 

A ir National Guard 

$169,000,000 

48,000,000 

16,440,000 

$233^40,000 

Congress appropriated $644.2 million for the Army and Air National Guard in Fiscal Year 1960. 

While a substantial sum, this represents less than two percent of the entire FY '60 Department of Defense appropriation. 

Yet, through the unique Federal-State partnership which characterizes the National Guard, these annual appropriations 

have made possible the development and maintenance of a significant portion of U. S. military strength, not only to augment 

the active Army and Air Force in time of national peril, but to perform essential service in peacetime as well. 

The following five pages give the overall view, the "big picture" of the Army and Air Guard. 

5 
PERSONNEL 

ARMY 

400,000 OFFICERS AND MEN—trained 

and ready . . . nearly V2 the size of the 

active Army 

100,000 NEW ENLISTEES ANNUALLY— 

with prior active service or for 6 

months active duty training 

70'; REENLISTMENTS ANNUALLY— 

a proud organization with a 300-year 

history 

20,700 FULL-TIME TECHNICIANS—the hard core 

of professionals .. . for maintenance—for 

training—for administration 

AIR 

71,000 OFFICERS AND MEN—trained . . . 

ready now to fight side-by-side with 

the active Air Force 

11,450 NEW ENLISTMENTS ANNUALLY 

—including skilled active Air Force 

veterans 

84'; REENLISTMENTS—highest of any 

military force in the nation 

13,200 FULL-TIME TECHNICIANS—keeping equipment and aircraft ready for 

instant action 

6 
TRAINING 

ARMY 

380,000 BASICALLY TRAINED (95r;)— 

all recruits with prior service or 6 

months Army training . . . over 80% 

of officers with active service. 

UNIT TRAINING ONLY—Individual 

training—a thing of the past .. . all 

units now on team level 

12,300 ATTENDING SCHOOLS—maintaining proficiency, qualifying for promotion . . . standards identical with 

active Army 

44,000 TAKING ARMY EXTENSION 

COURSES 

90r; ATTENDANCE—at weekly and at 

annual field training 

AIR 

OVER 95r; BASICALLY TRAINED—a 

ready now force, requiring all non 

prior service men to take basic training with the Air Force 

JET INSTRUMENT COURSE—operated 

entirely by the Air National Guard 

. . . 224 graduated this year 

SCHOOLING—over 2,300 officers and 

airmen completed service and technical schools in '60 . . . Air Guardsmen abreast of the times 

OVER 90% ATTENDED weekly unit training and annual field training 

7 
ORGANIZATION 

ARMY 

4,400 UNITS IN 2,600 COMMUNITIES— 

a local force, ready for any emergency . . . dispersed to withstand 

nuclear attack 

PENTOMICALLY ORGANIZED—-light, 

mobile, hard-hitting . . . ready to fight 

on nuclear or conventional battlefields 

21 INFANTRY & 6 ARMORED DIVISIONS—nearly twice the number of 

active Army divisions . . . many close 

to combat readiness 

52 NIKE MISSILE BATTERIES—operational and on-site—part of ARADCOM—defending against attack 24 

hours every day 

AIR 

546 TRAINED UNITS 

22 COMBAT WINGS, WITH .. . 40 Air 

Defense Squadrons—36 Tactical 

Fighter & Reconnaissance Squadrons 

ELEMENTS OF 20 Fighter Interceptor 

Squadrons and 4 Aircraft Control & 

Warning Squadrons are daily augmenting the active Air Force defense coverage. 

2 TRANSPORT WINGS WITH 

6 Heavy Transport Squadrons 

PLUS 

10 Support Flying Squadrons 

s 
EQUIPMENT 

ARMY 

51.5 BILLION INVENTORY—including 

some of the Army's latest items . . . 

modern equipment for effective training. 

2,850 TANKS 

2,200 OTHER TRACKED VEHICLES 

66,000 WHEELED VEHICLES 

915 AIRCRAFT 

2,400 ARTILLERY PIECES 

AIR 

$1.7 BILLION INVENTORY .. . all that's 

needed for instant action. 

2,269 AIRCRAFT F-lOOs 

F102s 

F-104s 

r-^nri 

C-97s 

RB-57s 

C-119s 

RF-84FS 
FACILITIES 

ARMY 

1,839 ADEQUATE ARMORIES 

939 MAINTENANCE SHOPS 

59 WAREHOUSE COMPLEXES 

51 SHOP HANGARS 

Army and Air Guard units are self-sufficient.—In their armories, their shops and at their air bases—they 

are capable of instant mobilization. 

AIR 

109 HANGARS 

93 FLYING FIELDS 

41 NON-FLYING INSTALLATIONS—including: 

Aircraft Control & Warning Sites 

Communications Squadron Sites 

10 
MISSION 

ORGANIZATION, AND 

ADMINISTRATION 

•••••••••••••••••••••••• • 

Mission of the National Guard 

The National Guard is rooted in the concept of the 

privilege and responsibility of our able-bodied citizens to 

be ready at all times to bear arms for the common defense. 

The drafters of the Constitution recognized the importance of this concept by empowering the Congress to "provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia." 

National military policy subsequently enacted into law 

has served to enhance the availability and improve the 

readiness of the National Guard as a Federal reserve 

force. The general policy stated in current law (32 USC 

102) is quoted: 

"In accordance with the traditional military policy 

of the United States, it is essential that the strength 

and organization of the Army National Guard and the 

Air National Guard as an integral part of the first line 

defenses of the United States be maintained and assured at all times. Whenever Congress determines 

that more units and organizations are needed for the 

national security than are in the regular components 

of the ground and air forces, the Army National 

Guard of the United States and the Air National 

Guard of the United States, or such parts or them as 

are needed, together with such units of other reserve 

components as are necessary for a balanced force, 

shall be ordered to active Federal duty and retained as 

long as so needed." 

While its Federal reserve potential has been strengthened, the National Guard of each State remains constitutionally a State-administered military force. The dual 

State-Federal missions are set forth in National Guard 

Regulation No. 45: 

"a. State—To provide units organized, equipped, 

and trained to function efficiently at existing strength 

in the protection of life and property and the preservation of peace, order, and public safety under competent orders of Federal or State authorities. 

"b. Federal—To provide trained units and qualified individuals available for active duty in time of war 

or national emergency in support of the Army's war 

plans and at such other times as the national security 

may require augmentation of the active forces." 

How the Army National Guard fits into and supports 

the Army Mission as "an integral part of the first line 

11 
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

"AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE FIRST LINE DEFENSES" 

defenses" is shown in this next chart. 

At top is shown the Army's world-wide commitments, 

such as in Europe, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and 

Korea. 

Next are the Army forces deployed in defense of the 

continental United States and those awaiting early deployment overseas. These include Air Defense Missile 

units, the Strategic Army Corps (STRAC), the Strategic 

Army Force (STRAF) to replace STRAC, and the support base for the entire Army. 

Below we see how organizations of the Army National 

Guard comprise an integral part of these first line defenses. 

First, ARNG Nike Ajax batteries engage with units of the 

active Army in 'round-the-clock defenses of key industrial 

areas. Next, ARNG units round out the Strategic Army 

Force. Third are shown the remaining Nike Ajax units, 

and fourth, the six Guard Divisions making up the Ready 

Reserve STRAF which would replace STRAF as those 

units replace STRAC divisions deploying overseas. Next 

are the 9 Infantry and Armored Guard Divisions of the 

Contingency Force which stand ready to reconstitute the 

Ready Reserve STRAF, and finally, the remaining 12 

Combat divisions and the non-divisional units needed for 

full mobilization of the Army. 

CH OF STAFF CH OF STAFF 

ACSRC AFCRF 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

"AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE FIRST LINE DEFENSES" 

Similarly, the Air National Guard fits into and supports 

U. S. Air Force missions as shown on the above chart. 

At the top are the Air Force's world-wide commitments, 

such as NATO, SEATO. Middle East, and the Far East. 

Next are shown the gaining commands to which ANG 

units are assigned upon mobilization. These include the 

Air Defense Command (ADC), Tactical Air Command 

(TAC), Military Air Transport Service (MATS), Alaskan 

Air Command (AAC), and Air Materiel Command 

(AMC). In addition, the Hawaii ANG is committed to 

the Pacific Air Forces and one ANG communications unit 

is committed to the Air University at Maxwell Air Force 

Base, Alabama. 

The bottom line reflects the types of units comprising 

the ANG force structure. As the arrows indicate, some 

ANG units are serving in peacetime as integral elements 

of active Air Force commands. For example, 21 ANG 

interceptor squadrons maintain aircraft on runway alert 

full time under ADC control. ANG tactical squadrons 

perform peacetime missions for TAC. ANG heavy transports carry cargo for MATS. Air Guard GEEIA squadrons 

handle communications construction projects on USAF 

missile sites and other bases. 

The National Guard Bureau is both a staff and an 

operating agency. As this chart shows, it is a joint Bureau 

of the Departments of the Army and the Air Force. The 

Chief, National Guard Bureau reports to the Secretaries 

of the Army and the Air Force through the respective 

Chiefs of Stalf and is the principal staff advisor on National Guard affairs. 

As an operating agency, the National Guard Bureau is 

the channel of communication between the States and the 

Departments of the Army and the Air Force. 

National Guard Bureau 

CHIEF 

NGB 

12 
NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 

ORGANIZATION CHART 

CHIEF, NOB 

< DEPUTY C/NGB f ^ 

1 

ADMIN 

OFFICE 

1 

PUB 

AFFAIRS 

rLEGAlTl 

ADVISOR | 

' POLICY | 

a LIAISONJ 

The organization of the National Guard Bureau is 

shown on this chart. The offices of the Assistant Chief 

National Guard Bureau, Army, and the Assistant Chief 

National Guard Bureau, Air. are similarly organized. The 

Administrative Office and the Offices of the Legal Adviser, 

Public Affairs, and Policy and Liaison advise and assist 

the Chief, National Guard Bureau on both Army and Air 

matters, 

Major General Winston P. Wilson, Deputy Chief of the 

National Guard Bureau, and Assistant Chief of the National Guard Bureau, Air, was designated as Acting Chief 

of the Bureau effective 1 June 1959, and continued to 

serve until 20 July 1959. On that day. Major General 

Donald W. McGowan was sworn in as Chief of the National Guard Bureau. General McGowan had served as 

Chief, Army Division, National Guard Bureau, since 1 

November 1955 and previously as Commanding Generalof the 50th Armored Division, New Jersey Army National 

Guard. From 20 July 1959 to 21 October 1959, Colonel 

Charles Southward served as Acting Assistant Chief, National Guard Bureau, Army. On 21 October 1959, 

Major General Clayton Price Kerr was sworn in as Assistant Chief of the National Guard Bureau, Army. General 

Kerr was formerly the Commanding General of the 49th 

Armored Division, Texas Army National Guard. 

The function of the National Guard Bureau is to formulate and administer a program for the development and 

maintenance of Army and Air National Guard units in 

the several States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and 

the District of Columbia, in accordance with the general 

policy and the dual State and Federal missions prescribed 

in law and regulations. 

The Chief of the National Guard Bureau is appointed 

by the President, with the consent of the Senate, from a 

list of National Guard officers recommended by the respective Governors, for a term of four years, and is eligible 

to succeed himself. The grade authorized for this position 

is major general. 

The former Chiefs of the National Guard Bureau and 

its predecessor organizations (Division of Militia Affairs, 

1908-1916, and Militia Bureau, 1916-1933) are listed in 

Appendix A. A roster of officers on duty in the National 

Guard Bureau as of 30 June 1960 is attached as Appendix D. Appendices B and C, respectively, show the State 

Adjutants General and United States Property and Fiscal 

Officers as of 30 June 1960. 

Management Improvement 

INVENTORY MANAGEMENT 

The Inventory Management Plan of the Army National 

Guard includes two major facets: Standardized stock 

control for item accounting based upon the established 

Army Field Supply System, and Financial Inventory 

Accounting (F1A), implemented by the ARNG in FY 

1958. 

These two management tools are enabling the ARNG 

to achieve optimum balance between resources and minimum essential requirements. 

The accompanying chart shows the warehouse inventory 

picture from September 1957, the beginning of FIA, 

through 30 June 60 in terms of the stockagc objective in 

relation to the actual stock level. Through 30 June 1958 

and 30 June 1959, there were progressive reductions. 

As of 30 June 1960 the stockage objective was further 

reduced to $15,100,000 and the stock level to 

$14,600,000. 

The criteria for stockage, being based upon recurring 

demands, does not allow excess inventory to accumulate. 

Like well-founded commercial enterprises, success in inventory management is largely measured by the turnover. 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

WAREHOUSE INVENTORY 

{OPERATING SUPPLIES) 

BEGINNING FIA 

30 SEP 57 

13 
Slow moving or dead items serve only to increase costs of 

operations. 

For the three year period reflected on the chart, stockage 

objectives were reduced by $9,500,000 and warehouse 

inventories were down $17,000,000. The $15,100,000 

stock objective is approaching validity. 

DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS PROPERTY 

Disposal of surplus property, both in warehouses and at 

unit level, continued to be a major factor in the ARNG 

Supply Management Program during the year. 

The need for disposal resulted principally from obsolescense and ordinary wear and tear as well as from the recent reorganization. 

During the year property worth $147,800,000 was disposed of or redistributed. This represented 81.4 percent 

of the total excesses. 

As shown in the adjoining chart, property worth 

$20,600,000, or 14 percent, was utilized within the 

ARNG. 

Another $86,000,000, or 58 percent, was utilized by 

other Department of the Army Agencies; $9,500,000, or 

7 percent, was transferred to other Federal and State 

Agencies, and $31,400,000. or 21 percent was turned over 

to the Property Disposal Officers. 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

DISPOSITION OF EXCESS PROPERTY 

($147.8 MILLION IN FY I960) 

UTILIZED BY OTHER DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AGENCIES 

$86 3 

UTILIZED WITHIN ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

$20 6'""' 

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 

In March 1960 the Bureau initiated a financial management procedure in which States submitted FY 1961 State 

operating budgets to support their programs under the 

appropriations National Guard Personnel, Army, and 

Operation and Maintenance, ARNG. Guidance was provided to assist States in developing their annual program 

and funding requirements. Based upon review of these 

State operating budgets, annual funding programs were 

authorized. 

This procedure has provided a sound basis for financial 

management through initial review and subsequent quarterly analysis. States are now required to plan all phases 

of their program for the year, as compared to partial 

planning in prior years. This is expected to reduce significantly the number of funding adjustments and allotment 

documents issued to States. 

PAY VOUCHER SYSTEM 

During FY 1960, the ARNG made an extensive study 

of a new Military Pay Voucher System. This system provides individual vouchers, as opposed to a listing on a 

single payroll. Each Guardsman would receive a copy of 

his voucher with complete information as to entitlement 

and actual pay. The system is an adaptation of the active 

Army Military Pay Voucher with minor variations to meet 

particular needs of the ARNG and would provide uniformity between the active Army and ARNG which is 

desirable for mobilization purposes. In addition, the new 

pay system would spread the workload throughout the pay 

period and would eliminate several printed forms. In 

search of further improvement, the ARNG is now testing 

the mechanical preparation of these pay vouchers on electronic bookkeeping machines. 

AIR RESERVE FORCES MANAGEMENT 

PLAN 

A detailed study by the Air Force on effective and improved utilization of Reserve Forces resulted in a new Air 

Reserve Forces Management Plan. The plan, which was 

to be implemented on 1 July 1960, transfers responsibility 

of training and inspection from the Continental Air 

Command (CONAC) to the various major Air Force 

commands to which our units have D-Day assignments. 

This new concept provides a directly integrated effort between Air National Guard units and the gaining major 

commands. The ANG welcomes this plan in that it places 

responsibility directly with the gaining commands while 

simultaneously promoting simplification of administrative 

and communication practices. It is expected that this plan 

will also improve reaction time of ANG units. Active Air 

Force commanders have, likewise, accepted this plan with 

complete enthusiasm and sincere objectivity. 

KEY PUNCH REPORTS 

During FY 1960, key-punch machines were installed at 

each ANG base. Quarterly monetary inventory reports, 

expense reports, and trial balance reports are now submitted to the Bureau on punch cards, which have greatly 

facilitated the consolidation of these reports. The keypunch machines are also used to prepare requisitions for 

supplies obtained from depots and for reporting unit 

operational readiness under a new abbreviated quarterly 

report established during the past year. 

14 
TECHNICIAN MANNING 

As a result of imposed budgetary limitations during FY 

60 it was necessary to effect a reduction in the Air Technician Manning. During this same period the ANG experienced the acquisition of more complex weapon systems. To meet the additional workload generated by these 

complex systems under an austere work force, it was vital 

to develop work procedures, standards, and measurements 

that could be uniformly applied throughout the air technician program and which would provide, through management improvements, greater utilization of limited manSeveral bills directly affecting the National Guard were 

enacted into law by the 86th Congress during fiscal year 

1960. Following is a summary of the important aspects 

of this legislation: 

APPROPRIATIONS 

Public Law 86-166—the Department of Defense Appropriation Act for.fiscal year 1960. Included National 

Guard Personnel, Army, and National Guard Personnel, 

Air Force; Operation and Maintenance, Army National 

Guard, and Operation and Maintenance, Air National 

Guard. 

Public Law 86-275—appropriations for the Department of Defense military construction for fiscal year 1960. 

Included Military Construction, Army National Guard 

and Military Construction, Air National Guard. 

Public Law 86-500—the military construction act of 

1960. It authorizes the Department of Defense to establish or develop facilities for the reserve forces, as listed 

in the act. Included are Army National Guard armory and 

non-armory and Air National Guard facilities. 

CONSTRUCTION 

Public Law 86-149, the military construction act of 

1959, authorized the Department of Defense to establish 

or develop facilities for the reserve forces, as listed in the 

act. Included are Army National Guard armory and nonarmory facilities, and Air National Guard facilities. 

A number of bills of importance to the National Guard 

were still pending in the 86th Congress on 30 June 1960. 

They included: 

CLAIMS 

H.R. 5435 and S. 1764, identical bills, to authorize the 

Secretary of the Army or the Secretary of the Air Force 

power authorized. To achieve these objectives, boards of 

air technicians were appointed to examine and analyse, 

existing operations and management techniques with the 

aim of developing improved work standards which could 

be applied throughout the system in support of essential 

tasks. The recommendations submitted by these boards 

served as a basis for new work standards and procedures 

and resulted in obtaining greater utilization of the work 

force in being. Such standards and procedures are flexible 

and will continue to be applied as the change in the ANG 

program dictates. 

PERSONNEL 

Public Law 86-197, for the purposes of the Reserve 

retirement law credits the periods served in the National 

Guard after June 14, 1933, during which a person was in 

a federally recognized status, but before appointment .or 

enlistment was effected in a Reserve Component (National Guard of the United States, Army National Guard 

of the United States, or Air National Guard of the United 

States). 

Public Law 86-260 broadened the categories of those 

eligible for burial in national cemeteries to include members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces, the 

Army National Guard, the Air National Guard, and the 

Reserve Officers Training Corps if death occurs: (1) while 

on active duty for training or performing full-time training 

duty, (2) while performing authorized travel to or from 

such duty or training, or (3) while hospitalized or undergoing treatment at the expense of the United States for 

injury or disease contracted or incurred while on such 

duty, performing such travel or training, or undergoing 

such hospitalization or treatment; the surviving spouse, 

minor children and, in the discretion of the Secretary of 

the Army, unmarried adult children of such persons also 

to be eligible for burial in national cemeteries. 

Public Law 86-599 provided the necessary technical and 

substantive amendments to the Reserve Officer Personnel 

Act of 1954 which is the basis for promotion and elimination for members of the Reserve components of the Armed 

Forces. 

to pay claims against the United States for damage to, or 

loss of, real property, including damage or loss incident 

to use and occupancy; for damage to, or loss of, personal 

property, including property bailed to the United States or 

the National Guard, and for personal injury or death 

caused by a member of the Army National Guard or the 

Air National Guard while such member is engaged in 

Legislation Enacted 

Pending Legislation 

15 
training or duty under sections 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 

of title 32, United States Code, or under any other provision of law for which such member is entitled to pay 

under section 301 of title 37, and while acting within the 

scope of his employment. Similar authority is contained 

with respect to claims resulting from activities within the 

scope of employment of those National Guard civilian 

employees whose hire is authorized under section 709 of 

title 32, United States Code. The bill also provided for 

the time in which such claims may be filed, and contained 

other limitations. The payment authorized under the bill, 

as amended, was limited to $5,000. with a proviso that 

any amount over and above $5,000 may be referred to 

the Congress for its consideration (Approved 13 September 1960, Public Law 86-740). 

ORGANIZATION 

H.R. 3361, a bill to provide for the statutory organization of the National Guard Bureau. 

PERSONNEL 

H.R. 3356. a bill to clarify the status of members of 

the National Guard performing "additional training or 

duty with or without pay" authorized by the Secretary of 

the Army or of the Air Force, or instructing at National 

Guard schools or attending such a school where all of 

the instructors are members of the National Guard not in 

active Federal service. Members of the National Guard 

are entitled to hospital benefits, medical care, and compensation for injury incurred or disease contracted during 

authorized training only if that training is itself authorized 

by one of the sections of title 32, expressly referred to in 

sections 318, 319, or 320 of title 32, United States Code. 

H.R. 3357, a bill to amend section 303(c) of the Career 

Compensation Act of 1949 to provide that the term 

"permanent station" may also include the home of a 

member upon order to, call to, or relief from active duty, 

active duty for training, or full-time duty performed under 

the provisions of sections 316, 502, 504, or 505 of title 

32, United States Code. Enactment would permit payment of temporary duty per diem allowances to such 

members. 

H.R. 3363, a bill to provide a flexible enlistment program to the National Guard to permit the appropriate service Secretaries to promulgate regulations whereby nonprior-service personnel could enlist for any specified period 

of not less than 3 years, prior service personnel could 

enlist for a specified period of not less than 1 year, and 

reenlistments could be authorized for any specified period, 

except for persons whose last service was in one of the 

three highest enlisted grades who could also be authorized 

to enlist for any unspecified period on a career basis; to 

authorize extensions of an enlistment, at the request of 

the member, for any period not less than 6 months; to 

continue the present authority of the President to extend 

enlistments in the National Guard for 6 months following 

termination of a national emergency declared by Congress; 

and to permit enlistments, reenlistments, and extensions of 

enlistments as Reserves of the Army or Reserves of the Air 

Force as appropriate to be concurrent with enlistments, 

reenlistments, and extensions in the Army National Guard 

or Air National Guard, assuring that all members of the 

National Guard will have a corresponding Reserve status. 

H.R. 3364, a bill to grant the same hospital and medical 

care, pay and allowances, and other benefits now provided 

for members of ;he reserve components who contract or 

aggravate a disease in line of duty while proceeding directly 

to or from, or performing inactive duty training or active 

duty for 30 days or less as are now provided for individuals while on duty for more than 30 days. Enactment of 

this bill would provide the same medical care and other 

benefits to members injured en route to or from inactive 

duty training as if they had been performing that duty. 

H.R. 3370 and S. 239, similar bills, to modernize and 

clarify sections 326-333 of title 32, United States Code, 

with respect to a system of courts-martial for the National 

Guard not in Federal service; and to permit the States to 

adopt their own codes of military justice. 

H.R. 5040, a bill to extend to members of the National 

Guard who perform 3 to 6 months of active duty for 

training the same reemployment rights available to members of the Ready Reserve performing the same type and 

length of training; and to adjust the time period within 

which leave of absence rights must be asserted after the 

performance of inactive duty for training other than an 

initial period of 6 months of active duty for training, and 

after being examined for induction. (Approved 12 July 

1960, Public Law 86-632). 

H.R. 8212, a bill to amend the provision of law pertaining to physical examinations for members of the Reserve components so as to eliminate the requirement for 

physical examination for members of the Standby Reserve 

and permit the appropriate Secretary to prescribe regulations governing physical examinations for such members; 

and to authorize, under regulations proposed by the 

appropriate Secretary, commissioned officers of the Army 

National Guard of the United States or the Air National 

Guard of the United States, whether or not on active duty, 

to be designated as competent authority to order members 

of the Army National Guard of the United States or the 

Air National Guard of the United States to active duty, 

or take other actions with respect to the Federal status 

or members of those components. (Approved 7 July 

1960, Public Law 86-603). 

TECHNICIANS 

H.R. 3352, a bill to remove the present requirement 

that not more than 15 National Guard civilian caretakers 

U, 
may be employed at a single maintenance or storage pool, 

which would also repeal the provision that permits only 

one officer below the grade of major to be so employed. 

The requirement has been suspended in recent years by 

recurring provisions in annual appropriation acts for the 

Department of Defense. 

H.R. 4083 and S. 165, identical bills, to exempt from 

income tax the cost-of-living allowances paid to certain 

caretakers and clerks employed by the National Guard 

outside the continental United States or in Alaska. 

TRAINING 

H.R. 3355, S. 1027, H.R. 6318, and S. 1708, similar 

bills, to permit the training of State defense forces authorized by subsection 109(c) of title 32, United States Code, 

at Federal expense during the time of war, or of national 

emergency declared by the President or the Congress, or 

whenever the National Guard is in the active Federal 

service; to permit uniforms, arms, ammunition, and equipment, surplus to the needs of the United States, to be given 

to such defense forces; and to assign administration of the 

program, under regulations to be prescribed by the President, to the Chief, National Guard Bureau, the National 

Guard Bureau to be the channel of communication between all Federal departments and agencies, and the several States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Canal 

Zone, and the District of Columbia in matters pertaining 

to such forces. 

UNITED STATES PROPERTY AND 

FISCAL OFFICERS 

H.R. 5082, a bill to provide for the appointment of a 

person to perform the statutory and assigned duties of the 

United States property and fiscal officer in the event of the 

latter's death, incapacity, or absence. 

Information And Recruiting Program 

The annual information program of the National Guard 

Bureau is designed to accomplish two ends: ( 1 ) stimulate 

enlistments and thereby maintain the Guard at its approved 

strength, and (2) keep the public informed of the missions 

and accomplishments of the Guard. Some of the program 

is carried out on a national level. For the most part, however, the National Guard Bureau concentrates its efforts 

on providing materials and guidance to help the several 

States conduct their own recruiting and publicity programs. 

While the total authorized strength of the National 

Guard remained at 472,000 throughout fiscal year 1960, 

intensive recruiting efforts were necessary to provide replacements for personnel lost through attrition. Particular 

emphasis was placed on recruiting veterans and obligors. 

Continuing efforts were devoted to assisting the States in 

conducting public information and community relations 

programs. To illustrate the traditional militia role of the 

Guard and its current readiness, the chosen theme of the 

program was "Up-to-the-Minute Men, Defending America . . . Your National Guard." 

Approximately $400,000 from Federal appropriations 

was spent on the program during fiscal year 1960. Most 

of that amount was applied in contracting with a commercial advertising agency for the development and production of printed and graphic materials distributed to the 

States, as well as recorded radio programs and filmed 

television shows designed to be placed with stations to 

obtain free public service support for the National Guard. 

PRINTED MATERIAL 

During the year a variety of graphic materials was 

produced based on the "Up-to-the-Minute Men" theme. 

The theme was introduced by means of 5,000 24-sheet 

billboard posters which were shipped to the several States. 

In addition, 75,000 transit car cards based on the billboard art were produced for public display. In order to 

emphasize recruiting, the message printed on the transit 

car cards was "Join America's Up-to-the-Minute Men." 

A smaller, vertical version of the basic poster, for display 

in store windows and on counters, was produced on both 

glossy paper stock and easel-mounted board stock in 

quantities of 55,000 and 15,000, respectively. 

As a special project, 90,000 posters were furnished the 

U.S. Post Office for use on all its trucks during the month 

17 
NATIONAL GUARD 

75.000 POST OFFICE VEHICLES 

in ross the nation displayed this poster during February I960. 

Up-to-the-Minute Men 

Defending Americ 

• . 

fc 

YOUR 

NATIONAL GUARD 

of February. As another special project, 3.000 truck 

banners were distributed prior to Christmas for use on 

National Guard trucks carrying U.S. Mail during the holiday rush, bearing the message. "Season's Greetings! Helping Santa. Your National Guard." These banners were 

printed in two colors on drill cloth and distributed to the 

States based on the number of trucks loaned to post offices. 

Other printing projects during fiscal year I960 included 

the revision of two valuable booklets and the production 

of kits intended for special information programs 

• The "Bab] Booklet." containing baby pictures with 

humorous captions aimed at recruiting veterans and 

obligors, was reprinted to fulfill a request from the Department of the Army for 100,000 copies of a National Guard 

publication that could be made available to obligated 

reservists upon their separation from active duty. 

• A new version o\ the "lak e Six" booklet telling about 

the si\ months active duty for training program, was prepared, with a press run of 500.(100 copies 

• Special Kits were developed to help the States publicize 

the annual observance of Mustei Day during the Washington's Birthda) period. Press kits were mailed to 10.500 

daily and weekly newspapers. Radio and TV kits were 

mailed to 4,050 radio and television stations, A supplementary kit was produced for National Guard project 

officers, to guide them in arranging for coverage at the 

local unit level. 

• \ business and industry kit was prepared—for distribution during fiscal year 1961 to at least 3.000 business and 

industry leaders nationwide. This material was planned 

as part of a continuing effort to obtain greater employer 

support for employees who are members of the National 

Guard. Supplementary feature stories and illustrations 

were offered to information media controlled by business 

and industry leaders, to publicize the missions and capabilities of the National Guard. 

HISTORICA L PAINTING S 

During the past fiscal year, planning was begun on the 

"National Guard in Action" art series. This project will 

ultimately provide a series of oil paintings to depict heroic 

incidents in the history of the National Guard. Reproductions will be distributed to the States. During fiscal year 

I960, artists qualified in the military field were interviewed 

and production details were carefully screened. The several States were asked to submit recommendations on 

suitable subject matter and the Chief. National Guard 

Bureau, appointed a special committee to review the 

recommendations 

DISPLAYS 

The circulation to the States of eight large National 

Guard displays (si\ Army and two Air) highlighting the 

activities and contributions of the National Guard was 

continued. The displays are primarily for use at State and 

county fairs, festivals, and other public events drawing 

large crowds, 

RADI O 

In the area of broadcasting, the National Guard Bureau 

continued to develop high quality programs starring some 

of the Nation's leading entertainers and employing the 

latest broadcasting techniques. Each of the programs 

included commercials aimed at recruiting or public information objectives and was distributed for free public 

service presentation bj radio stations. 

The outstanding event of the year in radiobroadcasting 

was the success of "Radio Operation 52." which provided 

a 15-minute show for each week in the >ear to a total of 

more than 1,800 radio stations 1 his effort marked the 

first time that the Guard's radio programming extended 

over an entire year. 

["went) of the 52 shows were in the "1 et's Go I'o Town" 

scnes starring Mindv Carson with Sammy Rave; \bbe 

lane with \aviei Cugat. Connie Francis with Mitchell 

IS 
^ 

EVER-POPULAR 

Guy Lombardo completed his 12 th year of 

public service broadcasting for Air Guard. 

BUD WILKINSON, 

head coach of U. of 

Oklahoma, narrated 

new TV show, "Inside 

Basketball." 

Ayrcs; Bobby Darin with Ray Block; and Tony Bennett 

with Larry Elgart. 

"The Bob Crosby Show" was a series of 12 programs 

featuring Bob Crosby, the Bobcats, announcer Don 

Wilson, and as guest stars the Four Preps, the DeCastro 

Sisters, Connie Francis, and Rosemary Clooney. 

Two series of eight each were "The George Hamilton 

IV Show" and "Andy Williams Sings." The former, with 

George Hamilton IV as master of ceremonies, was produced in a country -and western format. Andy Williams' 

new show was a 15-minute version of his popular 5-minute 

National Guard show of past seasons. 

A band music finale marked the conclusion of "Operation 52" with four shows called, "Keep in Step with the 

Guard." Maestro Paul Lavalle played the role of National 

Guard host and introduced the music of the U.S. Army 

Field Band and the U.S. Air Force Band. Lieutenant 

Colonel Chester Whiting, a former Massachusetts Guardsman, led the Army Field Band in two shows and Colonel 

George S. Howard conducted the U.S. Air Force Band in 

the other two shows. The music included marches, dance 

numbers, and specialty arrangements. 

Now almost an Air Guard institution, "Lombardoland, 

U.S.A." was continued for the ninth consecutive year. 

Featuring the highly popular Guy Lombardo, this series 

of 48 half-hour shows was broadcast by more than 250 

stations of the Mutual Broadcasting System. 

In connection with Muster Day, the National Guard 

was featured on NBC's "Monitor" and such popular programs as "Queen for a Day." 

TELEVISION 

In the field of television, two principal efforts were made 

to widen the audience of National Guard programs. One 

production of the year was a series of 10 country and 

western 15-minute television programs. Named "Community Jamboree," the programs feature such top names 

in country and western music as Jim Reeves, Ferlin Husky, 

Ernest Tubb, and Faron Young. Also during the year, 

production was begun on "Inside Basketball" with Bud 

Wilkinson, modeled on the famous coach's other popular 

shows for the Guard, "Inside Football," and "Inside 

Sports." Featuring the 1960 United States Olympic 

Basketball team, it was filmed at West Point where the 

championship team prepared for the 1960 games. As in 

his other "Inside" sports features, Coach Wilkinson covers 

the fundamentals and fine points, with the country's finest 

athletes demonstrating how it's done. 

Another television highlight of the year was the development of "animated commercials" for public service 

presentation on the nation's television stations. The "commercials" were produced as 60, 20, and 10-second 

announcements. The technique, relatively new in the 

field, consists of animated cartoons superimposed on actual 

photographs. The National Guard production was hailed 

as a significant achievement by Broadcasting magazine. 

MEDIA RELATIONS 

In June, the National Guard Bureau convened a committee of State Public Information Officers to develop 

plans for creating a wider understanding of the missions 

and requirements of the Army National Guard. 

As another important part of the Guard's public information activities, the Office of Public Affairs, National 

Guard Bureau, provided a wide range of services to keep 

the general public informed about the National Guard 

and its activities. News releases, speeches, periodical and 

encyclopedia articles, and other material were cleared or 

released through the Department of the Army, Air Force, 

and Defense. Information activities also included liaison 

with members of Congress, military and other Federal 

government agencies, and State and local officials, to provide answers to inquiries on virtually all aspects of National Guard organization, personnel, installations, equipment, and operations. 

Other activities of the Office of Public Affairs included 

the maintenance of historical documents for use in information programs and as an aid to scholars and military 

writers, the supervision of the heraldic and insignia programs of the Army and Air National Guard, and the 

promulgation of information relating to policy in the fields 

of insignia and historical material. 

19 
Trophies And Awards 

The trophies and awards program, designed to inspire 

a wholesome spirit of rivalry among individuals and units 

of the National Guard, also provides valuable training 

incentives. It stimulates interest in perfecting proficiency 

with individual weapons and in achieving a high standard 

of efficiency in training and maintenance. Presentations 

are made annually by the Chief of the National Guard 

Bureau and sponsoring agencies to outstanding personnel 

and units in both the Army National Guard and the Air 

National Guard. 

The National Guard Bureau coordinates National 

Guard participation in activities conducted under this program. Pamphlets, bulletins and letters announcing winIn the administration of National Guard affairs. National 

Guard Regulations and Air National Guard Regulations 

govern the National Guard when not in Federal service. 

These regulations announce the approved policies of the 

Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force 

pertaining to the Army and Air National Guard. Additionally, certain Army Regulations and Air Force Regulations govern the Army and Air National Guard when 

ners are published after each competition. Supplementary 

information is made available for release to the press. 

The newest addition to the Trophies and Awards Program is the Erickson Trophy, named for Major General 

Edgar C. Erickson (Ret) who served as Chief, National 

Guard Bureau from June 1953 to May 1959. This trophy 

will be awarded annually to the Distinguished Graduate 

of each of the Officer Candidate courses conducted at the 

U.S. Army Infantry School and the U.S. Army Artillery 

and Missile School, as well as the Distinguished Graduate 

of each of the State Officer Candidate Schools. The Trophy 

is a replica of the "Sons of Liberty" bowl designed and 

executed by Paul Revere, and is ail appropriate tie to the 

prc-Revolution history of the National Guard. The original Erickson Trophy will be permanently displayed in 

the Milton A. Reckord Lounge of the National Guard 

Association Memorial Building in Washington, D. C. Each 

Distinguished Graduate will receive a smaller facsimile of 

the trophy. Additionally, the names of the recipients will 

be permanently recorded on parchment displayed with the 

original trophy. 

The following trophies and awards arc described in 

Appendix E: 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

I he National Guard Association Trophy. Pershing 

Trophy and National Guard (State) Trophy 

The National Rifle Association Trophy 

The Chief, National Guard Bureau's Trophies 

The Military Police Team Pistol Trophy 

The Eisenhower Trophy 

The U.S. Army Air Defense Commander's Trophy 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

The Earl T. Ricks Memorial Trophy 

The National Guard Association Trophy (Air) 

The SpaatZ Trophy 

The Winston P. Wilson Trophy 

The Air Force Association Outstanding Airman 

Award 

specifically applied by the Chief. National Guard Bureau. 

During the fiscal year, the Chief. National Guard 

Bureau, has revised a number of existing regulations and 

issued some new regulations, covering administration, 

personnel, organization, operations, finance, training, and 

logistical matters, and in addition NGB Pamphlets and Air 

National Guard letters which amplify the regulations. A 

detailed resume is contained in Appendix F. 

Regulations 

20 
State Emergencies 

As in the past, the National Guard of the several States 

responded in State and local emergencies during fiscal 

year 1960. Reports have retlected the Guard's participation in rescue and relief missions, civil disorders, flood and 

disaster duty. The cost of these activities was borne entirely 

by the States. Accounts of typical emergencies follow: 

SEARCH AND RESCUE 

Twenty-four members of the 160th Armor Group 

searched for 15 hours in a swampy area of Monroe 

County, Ga., before locating a lost man and his young 

nephew. The Georgia Guardsmen were ordered out in the 

early evening and searched all night before finding the 

pair near noon the following day. 

Iowa's National Guard was called upon in 1959 to 

rescue two men whose small boat had been swept over a 

dam on the Cedar River. Before the local sheriff had called 

the Guard aviation unit at Boone, efforts had been underway for 6 hours to reach the two victims who clung to some 

steel pilings in the foamy turbulence below the dam. Lieutenant Colonel Milford L. Juhl. Aviation Officer of the 

34th Division, completed the 2-hour helicopter flight from 

Boone to the damsite just before sundown. It took him 

only five minutes to make the two flights necessary to get 

the men ashore. The victims suffered only severe sunburn. 

In an editorial, the Cedar Rapids Gazette commented that 

one of the most impressive things about it, in retrospect, 

is that the State not only had a helicopter available for 

such service, but of more importance it also had a pilot 

eminently qualified to perform such a tricky and delicate 

maneuver. 

MERCY MISSIONS 

Members of the 734th Ordnance Battalion, Iowa 

ARNG, converted one of the unit's armament repair vans 

as an ambulance in order to aid a polio victim. The victim, a young woman, had to be transported from Des 

Moines to Iowa City for treatment. The large vehicle was 

stripped of its repair equipment to make room for the 

patient, her iron lung, and three members of a hospital 

staff. The Guardsmen also rigged an electric generator on 

the van to power the respirator. 

A mercy flight by the Colorado ANG probably saved 

the life of a woman in Casper, Wyoming, where the drugs 

needed for her recovery could not be obtained locally. 

The nearest source of the drugs was Denver, Colorado, 

home of the 120th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron. The 

squadron was notified when it was discovered that regular 

delivery means could not procure the drugs in time. The 

Guardsmen flew the drugs to Casper in a T-33 jet trainer, 

winning new respect for the Guard in the region. 

EXPLOSIONS AND FIRES 

Early one morning in August, a shattering explosion destroyed most of the downtown section of Roseburg. Oregon, and provided a grim opportunity for the local unit to 

demonstrate its value to the devastated community. A 

small rubbish fire was started near a truck which was 

parked waiting an early morning delivery of its 6'/2-ton 

cargo of high explosives. The fire reached the truck and 

the force of the resulting blast hurled the largest remaining 

21 
part of the truck, an axle, for eight blocks. Only a few 

walls remained standing in the six blocks around the blast 

site. Extensive damage was caused in an additional 20-

block perimeter. Although the explosion occurred at a 

few minutes past 1 a.m., half the Guardsmen of Company 

D, 2d Battle Group, 186th Infantry, were on hand at the 

armory 30 minutes after the explosion. The Guardsmen 

at once began to patrol the area to prevent looting and to 

search for the dead and injured. 

During the day, two more units of the 2d Battle Group 

were placed on State active duty; Company B of Cottage 

Grove, and Company C, Grants Pass. The Battle Group 

established operating headquarters and the armory was 

set up to feed rescue personnel and to serve as an emergency aid station. Guard units around the State furnished 

generators, automobiles to replace damaged police ears, 

radios and bedding. More than 200 Guardsmen on duty 

worked in shifts around the clock lor S days. Oregon's 

Senator Richard L. Neuberger praised the efforts of the 

Guardsmen on the floor of the U.S. Senate a few days 

later. 

Members of Baltimore's 104th Tactical Fighter Squad 

roil were involved in two disaster actions in less than 10 

days. Thirty-five members of the squadron went to the 

crash scene of a civilian airliner which had exploded in 

flight. The Guardsmen removed the victims, gathered 

baggage, and maintained radio communications with the 

scene. 

Eight days later, when an explosion roared through a 

paint hangar in the Martin Company, 21 Guardsmen from 

the squadron rushed immediately to the scene. The Martin 

Company lies just across the highway from Reckord Field 

where the 104th is stationed. The blast had wrecked the 

hull of a Navy seaplane, and flames, fed by solvents, 

threatened to destroy the entire hangar. The Guardsmen, 

who were the first to arrive on the scene, risked their lives 

to free trapped workmen and subdue the lire with foam. 

Five employees of the Martin Company were killed and 

three injured, but the Guardsmen were credited with saving others and preventing the destruction of the hangar. 

More than half the Guardsmen suffered burns or minor 

injuries. The Martin Company recommended all of the 

Guardsmen for Air Force Exceptional Service Awards in 

recognition of their heroic action. 

CIVIL DISORDERS 

North Carolina Guardsmen were a calming influence in 

the emotion packed strike at the cotton mills of Henderson. 

North Carolina. Before the Guardsmen were called out, 

there had been dynamiting and sniping by phantom riflemen. The strong feelings of the local citizens made it a 

difficult and unpleasant task for the Guardsmen. But 

their unofficious manner and calm efficiency subdued the 

unlawful activity almost immediately. 

I he strike had continued for 6 months before 300 

Guardsmen were called to active State duty. For the next 

three months, a total of 1,500 North Carolina Guardsmen 

served in Henderson. During the 2 weeks when the Army 

Guardsmen were scheduled for field training, members of 

the ANG of North Carolina assumed the duty to allow the 

Army Guardsmen to attend the summer field training at 

full strength. State officials had high praise for the conduct of the Guardsmen during the long and difficult period. 

Minnesota Guardsmen were ordered to active State 

duty in Albert Lea after a 6-week strike resulted in violence and vandalism. Three companies of the 2d Battle 

Group. 135th Infantry, were called out beginning on 

December 10. The Headquarters Company of Mankato and 

Company C of Rochester went on duty first as Governor 

Orville Freeman declared martial law throughout the whole 

county. A few days later. Company E of Faribault reported 

to bring the on-duty strength to 275. 

Thus the Guardsmen found themselves in the emotional 

atmosphere surrounding the strikebound Wilson and Company packing plant. Until the Guardsmen reported, tension in the community had mounted to the critical point. 

Windows had been smashed, cars overturned, and rock 

throwing crowds caused concern for the safety of the people embroiled in the controversy. However, when the 

businesslike Guardsmen appeared with bayonets fixed, the 

violence ended, and Guardsmen concentrated on restoring 

order to the community. Under the influence of the 

ARNG, tensions eased and the plant was reopened 16 

days after the appearance of the Guard. By the 4th of 

January, the last remaining Guardsmen were released and 

special deputy sheriffs took over. 

AIRPLAN E CRAS H 

A 48-hour field problem of three ARNG medical units 

suddenly turned int.) the real thing last summer when an 

Army plane crashed in their training area. The plane, 

carrying members of an active Army unit, had crashed 

on the Ft. Carson, Colorado, reservation immediately after 

takeoff. The Guardsmen gave the victims first aid and 

helped evacuate them in helicopters. Within a half hour 

the injured soldiers were in the hospital. The Colorado 

Guardsmen were members of the 928th Ambulance Company of Burlington, and the 217th Medical Battalion and 

947th Clearing Company of Denver. 

MANHUNTS 

When a siege by police failed to rout a berserk killer, 

the Pennsylvania ARNG provided a tank to enable lawmen to reach the deranged man's rural hideaway near 

Uniontown. The unusual duty began after the frenzied 

man unaccountably killed four persons and wounded five 

others, including two infants. Before the Governor was 

called on for assistance, the man's gunfire had held off 

22 
police for 9 hours. Although ordered to leave any shooting up to the civil authorities, the Guard contribution 

proved to be the key to the deadlock. The tankers, all 

members of the 28th Infantry Division, employed a typical 

infantry support tactic—they slowly drove the tank up to 

the house shielding the police who followed foot-soldier 

fashion. When they were close enough, the police lobbed 

tear gas and incendiary bombs into the house, routing its 

occupant. He was shot down by police as he tried to 

reach his automobile. The tank and crew were from 

Connellsville's Troop B, 1st Reconnaissance Squadron, 

103d Armor. 

Twenty-five minutes after city officials of Taunton, Massachusetts, called on the local Guard unit for aid in capturing an escaped ps'ychopath, 16 Guardsmen reported to 

the Chief of Police. Less than an hour and a half later, 

a group of five patrolling Guardsmen captured the hatchetarmed mental patient. A total of 71 officers and men of 

the local unit, Battery B, 2d Automatic Weapons Battalion, 211th Artillery, responded within an hour of the 

first call. 

VOLCANIC ERUPTION 

Hawaii Guardsmen were called out in January as a new 

volcano erupted on the eastern tip of Hawaii, the largest 

island of the 50th State. First, an earthquake near the 

communities of Kapoho and Warm Springs caused a crack 

in the earth's surface. For over a month, lava and debris 

poured from the fissure resulting in the destruction of the 

two coastal communities. 

As soon as the new volcanic activity was noted, the 2d 

Battle Group, 299th Infantry, was called out to aid Civil 

Defense officials. The Guardsmen helped establish a 

rescue center at the nearby town of Pahoa and led the 

evacuation of Kapoho and Warm Springs before the molten 

lava engulfed the communities entirely. Using their trucks 

and busses, Guardsmen moved personal possessions and 

livestock to safety. They also set up a radio network when 

power and communications lines were wiped out. In addition, Army and Air National Guard planes flew government officials and scientists to and from the scene. The 

Battle Group remained on duty for 33 days before the 

emergency ceased, and one plane of the Hawaii Army 

National Guard continued to patrol the area for an additional 8 days to detect any further activity. 

HURRICANE 

When Hurricane Gracie smashed into the coastline of 

South Carolina, it found the members of the 1st Battle 

Group, 118th Infantry, already alerted and standing by 

for emergency duty. Including reinforcements from other 

Guard units, a total of more than 1,000 South Carolina 

Guardsmen were on duty when the storm ended. With 

winds up to 125 miles per hour, the Guardsmen kept on 

duty, sheltering and feeding victims, directing traffic, 

guarding homes, providing water supplies, and clearing 

wreckage from the streets. Others set up road blocks 

near fallen power lines, hauled in emergency supplies, set 

up communications after the phone system was knocked 

out, and set up kitchens for rescue workers. 

ANIMAL EMERGENCY FOOD DROP 

An estimated 50,000 sheep and thousands of cattle were 

saved by New Mexico Guardsmen when a mid-December 

snowstorm piled up in drifts as high as 12 feet. Shortly 

after the snow had stopped falling, the State Adjutant 

General ordered an ANG haylift to provide the isolated 

herds with food. Using one plane to scout for livestock 

and the State's C-45 as the drop plane, over 60 tons of 

hay were delivered to the hungry animals. 

Later, the New Mexico ARNG took over to finish the 

job. Using Guard trucks, the citizen soldiers battled 

through the heavy drifts to open trails to ranch houses and 

bring in more feed for the herds. 

In these and many other instances, the National Guard 

continued to uphold its great tradition of service to State 

and community. 

Active Army and Air Force Support 

Never has the National Guard received such close and 

sustained support from the active Army and Air Force as 

in the years since the end of the Korean War. The Guard 

has become, in fact, an integral part of our Nation's defense team and no effort has been spared to bring our 

units up to an unprecedented level of readiness. Much has 

23 
been asked of the Guard during this period, but much has 

been given in return. 

ARM Y NATIONA L GUAR D 

"One Army" has been more than just a platitude. When 

General Maxwell D. Taylor, as Army Chief of Staff, said 

that "the Army National Guard, the Army Reserve, and 

the active Army make up a single integrated Army with 

a single task to perform," he was expressing in practical 

terms the essence of this concept. 

In the area of direct support, the active Army contributes both manpower and equipment throughout the year 

to the Guard. More than 2,600 highly qualified active 

Army advisors are assigned year-round to our units, and 

training evaluators are assigned to every unit during annual 

field training. Army recruiters have been helpful in filling 

our manpower requirements whenever assistance is requested by the States. In addition, thousands of Guardsmen attend active Army service schools each year and 

many thousands more take extension courses conducted 

by these schools. A principal reason for the success of 

our State-operated officer candidate schools is the fact that 

all lesson plans and examinations are prepared by the U.S. 

Army Infantry School at Fort Benning, Georgia. The 

Army supplies the Guard with all its ammunition requirements, and provides heavy equipment from its inventory 

without reimbursement and augments it with additional 

equipment during annual field training. 

Not all support, however, can be measured in terms of 

man hours and equipment. In recent years, the policy of 

both the Army and Air Force has been to assign to the 

Guard vital roles in the day-to-day missions of the active 

establishment, thereby further integrating the Guard into 

the defense team and providing most realistic training. 

Selected units of the ARNG have been earmarked for 

earliest deployment with the Army's Strategic Army Force. 

Guard NIKE units are filling an active role round-theclock in the active Air Defenses of the Nation. ARNG 

aircraft maintenance units are supporting flying elements 

of the U.S. Army Reserve. 

And in the winter of 1960, for the first time in history, 

an Artillery battalion of the Utah National Guard was airlifted to Puerto Rico to take part in joint Army-Air Force 

maneuvers. 

With the accession of heavy air-transport in the Air 

National Guard, the National Guard, Army and Air, is 

now especially well-suited for this type of "flight and fight" 

operation. 

AIR NATIONAL GUAR D 

General Thomas D. White, U.S. Air Force Chief of 

Staff, has said: "Our Air Reserve Forces represent more 

than backup—they are first string players on the Air 

Force team!" 

As in the case of the Army, the Air Force has been 

backing up these words with advisors, recruiting support, 

school facilities, and modern equipment that includes such 

late-model aircraft as the F-100, the F-102 and the F-104. 

And, like the Army, the Air Force has been taking 

steps wherever possible to integrate the Air Guard even 

more into the "Air Force team." Air defense units of 

the Air National Guard stand 24-hour-a-day runway alert 

in key areas of the U.S., ready to "scramble" their jets on 

a moment's notice. Heavy transport squadrons are daily 

flying their huge C-97 Stratofreighters, carrying essential 

cargo to overseas bases for the Military Air Transport 

System. 

And during FY I960, one of the most far-reaching 

reorganizations in Air National Guard history was completed. ANG units are now assigned to the various Air 

Force commands under which they will operate upon 

mobilization. This reorganization completely integrates 

our units into the major Air Force commands. 

4 
ARMY 

NATIONAL GUARD 

•••••••••••••••••••***** * 

Foreword 

By law, (32 USC 102) the National Guard is "an integral part of the first line defenses." Significant steps 

toward more fully implementing the intent of that language 

have been realized. In October 1959, Secretary of the 

Army Brucker announced the "One Army" concept. He 

said in part, ". . . There must be complete acceptance 

of the concept that the Active Army, the Army Reserve, 

and the Army National Guard constitute one dynamic 

team, each member—each arm, service, and component 

—an indispensable military element of our defense; each 

member playing an essential role in an organization which 

has but one purpose, one mission, and one reason for 

existence—to be poised and ready to meet any military 

challenge to our national security." 

While Army Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor 

also stated: ". . . It must be remembered that the Army 

National Guard, the Army Reserve, and the active Army 

make up a single integrated Army with a single task to 

perform. All elements must fall into place on M-Day to 

form a balanced structure of combat-ready units and individuals. Many of the units required will be provided by 

the Army National Guard. Their missions are recorded in 

approved war plans just as specifically as arc those of 

active Army units." 

25 
Thus, not only by law, but in the minds and hearts of 

all who serve in the active Army, in the Guard, and in 

the Reserve, we arc one team—with one mission. 

During FY 1960, every aspect of the Army Guard program moved forward. With 400,000 officers and men all 

in unit training; with $1.5 billion as our equipment inventory; with over 1,800 adequate armories; with approximately 20,700 professional trained technicians; with 95 

percent individuals basically trained; with more training 

hours; with all this and much more—we look back with 

pride and ahead with anticipation to the achievement of 

greater preparedness and the performance of more vital 

service to our Nation. 

Comptroller Functions 

The Congress appropriated $386,661,000 for support 

of the Army National Guard during FY 1960. An additional $900,000 was provided for appropriation reimbursements to make a total of $387,561,000 in available funds. 

These funds were included in two appropriations rather 

than in one as in previous years. As in the past, however, 

a separate third appropriation was made for the construction of armory and non-armory facilities. 

APPROPRIATIONS 

Fiscal Yeal I960 

Appropriation 

Appropriated Reimbrirsemi ni 

National Guard 

Personnel, Army $234,961,000 $840,000 

Operation and 

Maintenance. ARNG 151,700.000 60.000 

Military-Construction, ARNG 23,219,000 

Total 

Vvailable 

$235,801,000 

151.760.000 

See Summary 

Statement, Military 

Construction. ARNG. 

These funds were for support of "an average strength 

of not less than 400,000" and an input of 62,000 Army 

National Guard trainees into the six months active duty 

training program. 

FUNDING 

An apportionment of $234,301,000 was made under 

the "National Guard Personnel, Army" appropriation. 

The Bureau of the Budget withheld the balance of 

$1,500,000 in legal reserve due to anticipated savings in 

subsistence and officer pay costs. 

The full amount of $151,760,000 was apportioned 

under the "Operation and Maintenance, ARNG" appropriation. 

Throughout FY 1960 the National Guard Bureau continued to issue to the States both maximum annual funding programs at the budget program level and quarterly 

allotments at the appropriation level. This procedure facilitated the States' administration of funds and provided the 

flexibility required to promote the effective management 

of resources. 

OBLIGATIONS 

l )bliKations 

FY I'Hid 

National Guard Personnel. Army__ .$232,265,680 

Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard ... 150.964,260 

Military Construction. Army National Guard 16.629.063 

State funding programs were 99.3 percent obligated, as compared 

with 99.5 percent in fiscal years 1958 and 1959. 

A table, by State and Department of the Army Agencies, of appropriated funds obligated during fiscal year 

1960 is attached as Appendix J. 

SUMMARY STATEMENT, MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION, ARNG 

(No year appropriation) 

Funds available from Fiscal year 1959 . $ 6,960,868 

Fiscal year 1960 appropriation _. _ 23,219.000 

Total available in Fiscal year 1960 $30,179,868 

Obligations in Fiscal year 1960 16,629.063 

Funds available for Fiscal year 1961 $13,550,805 

PROGRAM AND FUNDING 

ADJUSTMENTS 

During the last quarter of FY 1960, it was determined 

that obligations incurred for pay and allowances of air 

defense technicians attending annual service practice and 

troop and package training were properly chargeable to 

the "National Guard Personnel, Army" appropriation. 

As a result, obligations were transferred in May 1960 

from the "Operation and Maintenance, ARNG" appropriation. This additional fund requirement was absorbed 

within the overall availability of the "National Guard 

Personnel, Army" appropriation. Funds unobligated 

under the "Operation and Maintenance, ARNG" appropriation, as a result of this transfer, were used for logistical 

support and payment of revised Army-Air Force wage 

board locality schedules issued during fiscal year 1960. 

:<» 
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD TECHNICIANS 

A HARD PROFESSIONAL CORE-ESSENTIAL TO MOBILIZATION READINESS 

TECHNICIANS 

This chart depicts the vital role of Army National Guard 

technicians. Daily,, in all phases of our program—employed in units, shops, air defense sites and U.S. Property 

and Fiscal Offices in each State—they are our hard professional core, essential to mobilization readiness. 

They number approximately 20,700 officers and men. 

The chart shows some of the more important aspects of 

the Guard program in which they are intimately involved; 

the maintenance of strength, weekly and annual field training, care of $1.5 billion in equipment, unit training, and of 

course, the operational air defense mission. 

The technician makes these and other essential aspects 

of our program go. Their vital role in the overall readiness 

posture of the Guard cannot be overstated. In accordance 

with Army policy, every technician dollar relates directly 

to the maintenance of Federal equipment, the mobilization 

training of units, and the day-to-day administration of the 

Guard. 

ARNG Technician 

Program (7500) 

ARNG Air Defense 

Technician Program (7600) 

TOTAL 

Number 

30 J<••> 59 

17.217 

2,312 

19,529 

Employed 

30 Jin. 80 

16.904 

3.774 

20.678 

Man Venn 

KV I960 

16,850 

2,489* 

19.339 

Obligations 

$ 92,005,243 

15.198.257 

$107,203,500 

° Not include d in thes e 2,1H>) civilian ma n years ar e 51 8 military ma n \iars 

accomplished by Air Defense Technicians while attending resident courses nt 

instruction at Army Service Schools. 

Obligations include social security payments for ARNG 

technicians in 47 States and Puerto Rico, as well as for 

Air Defense technicians in 12 States. In addition, Wage 

Board increases authorized through 30 June 1960, step-ingrade increases for technicians, and differential pay of 

$1,268,021 are included. 

FINANCE ACTIVITIES 

The Army Audit Agency continued the internal-type 

auditing of Federal funds and property administered by 

U.S. Property and Fiscal Officers. Under this type of 

auditing, findings of these comprehensive examinations 

apply Federal standards and are reported in detail to 

State authorities, the National Guard Bureau, and interested offices of the Department of the Army. Such audits 

reflect procedural deficiencies and have resulted in improved operations within the States. The Bureau uses 

these findings as a basis for continued management 

improvements. 

The Bureau continued to review reports of survey 

appeals and made recommendations for relief when 

warranted. 

During the year, a nationwide test of a modified active 

Army pay voucher system was conducted in the Army 

Guard which resulted in adoption of the system for ARNG 

payments. The Bureau developed the detailed procedures 

necessary to implement the modified pay voucher system 

throughout ARNG. 

REPORTS CONTROL 

The Chief, National Guard Bureau, was granted reports 

control jurisdiction by the Comptroller of the Army over 

all reports initiated or implemented by NGB and prepared by the several States. 

During FY 1960, three reports were initiated, one was 

rescinded, and one NGB report was combined with a 

Continental Army Command report and is now under the 

jurisdiction of that command. 

27 
Personnel 

MILITARY STRENGTH 

The strength of the active Army National Guard on 30 

June 1960 was 401,765, in 4,386 federally recognized 

units. The chart shows the authorized and actual strengths 

from Fiscal '57 through Fiscal '60. 
PROCUREMENT (OFFICERS AND 

WARRANT OFFICERS) 

A slight reduction in officer strength was due principally to the continuation of selective criteria initiated 

during FY 1958 to improve the quality of the young 

officer corps of the Army Guard. This policy was further 

revised on 1 January 1960. In order to qualify for Federal recognition, the service experience of officers and 

former officers of a component other than Army or Marine 

Corps must now be commensurate with their new duties 

in the ARNG. 

Warrant Officer strength continued to drop as a result 

of limitations placed on appointments during the first half 

of FY 1960. This action was taken to insure that the 

assigned Warrant Officer strength did not exceed the total 

number authorized. 

PROCUREMENT (ENLISTED PERSONNEL) 

The following chart depicts the FY 1960 procurement 

of enlisted men by source. Losses were 98,500; gains 

101,600; a net gain of 3,100. As shown, the first two 

categories of gain, the RFA 6 Month Trainees, are by far 

our most important source of manpower—68 percent of 

the total. 

FY '60 ENLISTED GAINS AND LOSSES 

LOSSES 98,500 

GAINS 

1. Enlisted in '60 and take 6 in '60 53,800 

2. Enlisted in '60 and take 6 in '61 15,300 

3. Veterans 9,600 

4. RFA Obligors 7,100 

5. Transferred from Inactive National Guard. 3,000 

6. Enlisted from other Reserve Components. . 9.200 

7. Other 3,600 

TOTAL GAINS 101,600 

NET GAIN 3,100 

PERSONNEL ACTIONS 

Only 1.1 percent of completed State enlistment applications were rejected by the Bureau this fiscal year as compared to 1.2 percent rejected during FY 1959. This low 

rejection rate indicates the continued careful screening by 

recruiting personnel, unit commanders, and other State 

authorities. 

The table below is a resume of officer and warrant officer personnel actions for FY 1959 and 1960. Federal 

recognitions and transfers and reassignments increased 

significantly. 

I'Y l'li!) FY I960 

Federal recognitions 8.842 12,365 

Transfers and reassignments 13.593 34,494 

Transfers to Inactive Nat'l Guard 1,261 993 

Separations 5,508 4,443 

INPUT TO SIX MONTHS TRAINING 

The FY 1960 Six Months Training Input program was 

63,000. Some 63,603 actually entered this highly effective program. Since its inception in FY 1956, the ARNG 

has enlisted 205,491 to "Take 6" and 140,637 have completed training and returned to their units. 

RESERVE OFFICER PERSONNEL ACT 

Although the Reserve Officers Personnel Act (ROPA) 

will not be effective until FY 1961, the Bureau and the 

several States initiated impact studies in FY 1960. ' 

Prior to ROPA, an ARNG officer could be considered 

for promotion only when there was a unit vacancy. Under 

the provisions of ROPA, each officer will be mandatorily 

considered for promotion as soon as he has served a 

designated number of years in each grade. One of the 

important qualifications for promotion is that the officer 

must meet the military educational requirements for the 

next higher grade. 

During Calendar Year 1961, all officers who meet the 

time-in-grade requirements will be mandatorily considered 

for promotion by various boards throughout the country. 

Those officers who do not meet the military educational 

requirements for promotion can remain in the Guard for 

one year. After that, they will again be considered for 

promotion, and if not then qualified, will be separated. A 

2<> 
I STATE 

(% OF PRIORIT1 

cr 

u. 

z 

z 

— i 

-J 

UJ 

u 

_l 

_l 

— 

I 

< H ZJ 

X 

u 

— ^ 

< o 

— 

—) 

z 

< _l 

u. 

> 

z 

o C/> 

=— S < 0-

V 

z 

_l 

o 

o 

Q 

z < o 

to 

in 

<r S 

OVER PRIORITY AGGREGATE 

P.R. 

MINN 

DEL 

ILL 

UTAH 

1 ,333 

750 

249 

980 

345 

MICH 

IDAHO 

N.J. 

FLA 

N.M. 

684 

182 

766 

358 

154 

WIS 

PA 

N.Y. 

COL 

IND 

501 

726 

947 

100 

361 

GA 

MASS 

N.C. 

VT 

S.C. 

290 

444 

163 

16 

25 

9,374 

This chart shows Army National Guard strength by 

State. The priority aggregate strength is indicated by the 

"O" line and the actual 30 June '60 strength is shown as a 

percentage above or below that priority aggregate. 

30 
STRENGTHS 

AGGREGATE -3 0 JUNE '60) 

UNDER PRIORITY AGGREGATE 

NEB 

MISS 

WYO 

ALA 

MD 

— ^ 

or < 

14 

56 

14 

227 

104 

< 

X E 

ARI 

R.I. 

ARK 

HAW 

TEX K AN OKLA 

68 

66 

220 

105 

575 

z 

z 

UJ 

1-

< > 

KAN 

OKLA 

TENN 

W. VA. 

OHIO OHIO IOWA 

209 

235 

370 

131 

659 

LLI 

o * 

I OWA 

ORE 

KY 

S.D. 

VA 

< 

C/l > 

339 

310 

285 

259 

541 CONN 

D.C. 

CONN 

D.C. 

MO 

LA 

WASH 

O < 

2 -1 

463 

170 

813 

815 

614 

X 

in 

< i 

CALIF 

NEV 

ME 

MONT 

N.H. 

ALAS 

N.D. 

> 

LU UJ 

Z 2 

2 

12 

hz 

o 

2 

,353 

94 

438 

370 

423 

326 

558 

,224 N.H. ALAS 

a 

z 

-15 

-20 

31 
recent survey of all ARNG officers indicated that 56 percent of company grade officers and 46 percent of field 

grade officers must attend or complete extension courses 

of an Army Service School to meet the military educational requirements for promotion. 

From these facts, it is apparent that the attritive and 

mandatory consideration provisions of ROPA will produce an increase in the number of officers who will apply 

for enrollment in Branch Basic, Advanced, and Command 

and General Staff courses, cither resident at Service 

Schools or at home, through extension course study. The 

Commanding General, CONARC, is assisting the Guard 

and the Army Reserve to overcome this problem. He has 

directed each Army Service School to develop a combination resident and non-resident program at company and 

field grade level. This should help solve our problem, but 

increasing numbers will still be required to attend resident 

courses at Service Schools. 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD REGISTER 

The I January 1960 edition of the Official Army National Guard Register was distributed to the field during 

the early part of May 1960. This volume of over 1.100 

pages contained the names, and biographical, educational, 

and service data of about 40,325 ARNG officers and 

warrant officers, printed at a cost of $5,135. 

PAY GRADES E-8 AND E-9 

For FY 1960, a total of 871 grade E-8 spaces (first 

sergeant and master sergeant) were allocated to the States 

to be filled on a "best qualified" basis. By 30 June 1960, 

there were 833 E-8s in the ARNG. For FY 1961, spaces 

for E-8s were increased to 4,065. Concurrently promotion authority was broadened to permit consideration of 

all personnel qualified to fill TOE E-8 (NCO) positions. 

Allocation of E-9 spaces to the States will be made on 

1 October 1962. 

Medical Activities 

PERSONNEL 

The shortage of Medical Corps and Nurse Corps officers in the ARNG continued during FY 1960. However, 

percentage gains toward authorized strengths have been 

made despite an increase in TOE authorizations. At the 

same time, the surplus of Dental Corps and Medical 

Service Corps officers created by the recent reorganization 

has been reduced. The allotment of six dental detachments (team KJ) has permitted the retention of Dental 

Corps officers who otherwise would have been lost due 

to the reorganization. 

Actual Strength on 30 June 

Medical Corps 

Dental Corps 

Nurse Corps 

Medical 

Service Corps 

TOTAL 

1958 

643 

214 

31 

1,281 

1959 

721 

222 

41 

1,234 

I960 

847 

204 

56 

880 

30 June 

Authorized 

1,708 

211 

438 

954 

1960 

' ; Actual 

Authorized 

49.5 

96.6 

12.7 

92.2 

UNITS 2,169 2,218 1,987 3,311 60.0 

The number of federally recognized ARNG medical 

units was reduced from 247 to 170 in FY 1960, due to 

the reorganization which eliminated the medical detachment from many new TOEs and including the detachment 

as a medical section of headquarters units. 

FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED MEDICAL 

UNITS 

Medical detachments (organic) 

Medical companies (organic) 

Medical battalions, Hq & 

Hq detachments (organic) 

Medical companies (separate) 

Medical battalions, Hq & 

Hq detachments (separate) 

Evacuation hospitals 

Mobile army surgical hospitals 

Dental detachments (KJ) 

TOTALS 

MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS 

The constant and increasing surveillance to assure that 

ARNG personnel are medically fit for appointment or 

1959 

126 

54 

27 

20 

6 

10 

4 

0 

247 

I960 

42 

54-

27 

19 

8 

9 

5 

6 

170 

32 
enlistment, and remain fit for duty, is reflected by the following numbers of medical examinations reviewed: 

Purpoae ot examination 

Initial federal recognition, promotion, etc 

Army Aviation training or flight status 

Periodic and school 

Enlistment (questionable cases only) 

Fiscal Vciir 

1959 I960 

11.926 14,622 

253 308 

8,972 11.004 

5,247 5,253 

In addition, 17,318 statements in lieu of medical examinations were reviewed for evidence of medical defects. 

an increase of 2,008 over FY 1959. 

REPORTS OF INVESTIGATION 

A total of 3,655 reports of investigations for injury or 

disease related to training were processed in FY 1960. 

This decrease of 459 from FY 1959 is attributed to more 

experienced personnel and a better safety program. 

CIVILIAN MEDICAL CARE 

During FY 1960, $429,363 was expended for medical 

examinations and medical care in civilian facilities compared to $343,705 in FY 1959, reflecting both the increased cost of medical care and the increased number of 

examinations. 

MISCELLANEOUS 

There were no particular problems in medical supply. 

Immunization against poliomyelitis for ARNG personnel 

under age 40 was made a requirement in October 1959. 

Organization and Training 

TROOP UNITS ORGANIZATION 

The Army National Guard, as of 30 June 1960. consisted of 4,386 federally recognized units of company or 

detachment size, organized into Infantry, Armor, Artillery, 

and Other as indicated by the accompanying chart. 

The 4,386 federally recognized units represent a decrease of 1 1 1 units, or 2.5 percent below the 30 June 1959 

total of 4,497. 

On 21 October 1959. the ARNG completed a nationwide reorganization to the Pentomic concept—more than 

one year ahead of schedule. There were 4,479 units in the 

revised troop basis on 30 J une 1960. Authority was 

granted to organize 4,423 units; of these, 4,386 have been 

federally recognized. 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ORGANIZATION 

400.00 0 STRENGTH AND 450 0 UNITS 

t 21 INF DIVS 

11 BATTLE GROUPS 

2 SEP BNS f 

9 4 MSL S AIR DEF ARTY BN: 

5 6 FLD ARTY BNS 

6 ARMORED DIVISIONS 

8 ARMORED CAV REGTS 

8 TANK BNS 

B BATTALIONS (T/S) 

MAJOR HD0S 

SEP COS a DETS 

SPECIAL FORCES 

As part of the reorganization. Special Forces Units are 

for the first time included in the ARNG Troop Structure. 

In their combat role, these units infiltrate by air, sea, or 

land into hostile areas and organize the indigenous personnel for the conduct of guerrilla warfare. Eighty units were 

organized in five States. They were initially organized as 

individual Operating Detachments; later in the year a consolidation into larger groups was effected, providing a 

stronger command and administrative structure within 

each State. By 30 June 1960 these units were manned 

by approximately 1,000 Guardsmen. 

Training and readiness of these units progressed substantially during the year. An increasing number are qualified as parachutists. Units trained in their special combat 
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

ON-SITE AIR DEFENSE (NIKE) BNS 

^&*fl^^r ' 

1 

* • . _ 

2& 

W 

roles at Fc 

1960 annu 

rt Bragg Special Forces Tr 

al field training. 

lining 

J| 

x§3&i 

*, *^v •**" 

Center during 

AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY 

All air defense artillery objectives for FY 1960 were 

achieved or exceeded. By 30 June 1960, 52 NIKE-AJAX 

firing batteries were operational on site: in Los Angeles, 

. _ NEW TOR* 

FALO^f CITY 

•gWILAOCLW/* 

San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Norfolk, Washington-Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York City, 

and Boston. Eight additional NIKE-AJAX batteries had 

completed training at the U.S. Air Defense Center and 

were on-site preparatory to becoming operational. Four 

NIKE-HERCULES batteries had completed training at 

the U.S. Air Defense Center and were located in Hawaii 

on temporary sites with a limited operational capability. 

All other units were in the preparatory or school training 

phase of the program. 

As indicated on the map, the program provides for 34 

missile battalions organized in 15 States. Some 82 firing 

batteries are programmed to become operational on-site in 

16 defended areas. The two battalions in Hawaii are 

NIKE-HERCULES; all others are NIKE-AJAX. 

TRAINING 

Criteria 

The Army National Guard conducts training in accordance with criteria established by Headquarters, 

CONARC. These criteria were set forth in the appropriate annexes of the CONARC Training Directive dated 

1 July 1958, which also establishes the following objectives. 

a. Individuals. To insure that personnel are properly 

prepared to perform individual duties required upon 

mobilization, the following objectives pertain: 

(1) To train all personnel in the fundamentals of combat operations. 

(2) To develop and qualify personnel in all grades to 

perform duties which reasonably may be assigned to them 

both in peace and combat. 

(3) To develop and qualify all personnel in their TOE 

assignment. 

(4) To develop personnel as efficient instructors. 

(5) To develop a fully qualified individual to fill each 

34 
bring all units to such a state of training that a minimum 

of post mobilization training will be required prior to 

their being considered combat ready. 

Combat Training 

The general status of ARNG training on 31 December 

1960 is depicted on the "Arrow" graph. 

As indicated, an Infantry Battle Group of an Infantry 

Division undergoes a 36-week training program in attaining readiness for overseas deployment. The training program for units of Infantry and Armored Divisions arc 

comparable. Non-divisional units require less time. 

TRAINING FOR COMBAT 

(INFANTRY BATTLE GROUP) 

key NCO and specialist cadre position listed in the TOE. 

(6) To maintain standards of mental and physical fitness necessary for active duty. 

(7) To indoctrinate all individuals in the Code of 

Conduct. 

The chart shows ARNG individual training progress 

from FY 1957 through FY 1960. As shown, by 30 June 

1960, 95 percent of all officers and men were basically 

trained. Of those, 60 percent were prior servicemen or 

6 month trainees. The vital importance of the 6 month 

training program to this training progress is evident. 

ARMY NAT'L GUARD 

INDIVIDUAL TRAINING PROGRESS 

/ FY 57 FY 58 FY59 FY60 

404.000 422l0O0 40000 0 400.000 40000 0 

b. Units. Consistent with planned mobilization, two 

overall training objectives apply: First, to train each unit 

to the maximum degree of proficiency, starting with the 

squad or comparable unit, and progressing to larger units 

as the smaller elements become proficient; and second, to 

ADVANCED UNIT 

TRAINING 

(6 WKS) 

L -' MOBILIZATION 

r < OBJECTIVE 

BASIC UNIT 

TRAINING 

: (7 WKS) -I <CYgO LEVEL 

ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL 

TRAINING 

(8 WKS) 

BASIC COMBAT 

TRAINING 

(INDIVIDUAL) 

(8 WKS) 

UNIT 

TNG 

IND 

TNG 

The 6 Month Active Duty Training Program made it 

possible for the entire Army Guard to initiate basic unit 

training in October 1958. At the end of 1960, generally, 

ARNG units had attained a training status equivalent to 

the completion of 2 weeks of basic unit training or 1X of 

the total 36 weeks training program. 

The training objective is to reduce to a minimum the 

post-mobilization training requirement. Generally, the 

mobilization objective is to complete 26 weeks of the total 

36 weeks required, prior to mobilization. 

35 
Armory Training 

All ARNG members participated in 48 paid assemblies 

during FY I960. Multiple (8-hour) training assemblies 

accounted for 35 percent of the total. Multiple training 

assemblies are two 4-hour assemblies within one day, as 

a substitute for two regular 2-hour armory training assemblies. For FY 1960, the number of multiple training 

assemblies increased 28.5 percent over FY 1959. 

Funds for subsistence to support training assemblies 

were authorized on the basis of 52<* per trainee per meal. 

The percentage of officers, warrant officers, and enlisted 

men participating in armory training showed a slight decrease from the previous year. However, the decrease is 

insignificant and not indicative of a trend. Percentages of 

attendance at armory training during the past 2 years are 

shown below. 

Paid Armory Training 

Attendance Percentages 

(Excludes Constructive Attendance) 

Fisca l Year Fiscal Year 

I'lii) I96 0 

Officers and warrant officers 

Enlisted men 

96.4 

89.3 

95.8 

88.7 

Annual Field Training 

During 1960, approximately 330,000 Guardsmen, representing about 95 percent of ARNG paid drill strength, 

attended annual field training at 96 sites located throughout the several States and the Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico. Seventy-two percent trained at 62 federally owned 

and operated training sites, and twenty-eight percent at 

34 State-owned and operated sites. During this annual 

15-day field training, all federally recognized ARNG units 

performed unit training as prescribed in appropriate Army 

training programs. 
Active Army evaluation teams inspected the training 

and administration of all ARNG units. Reports of these 

daily inspections are used as a basis for corrective action 

and unit evaluation. Ratings for 1960 are shown below. 

TRAINING EVALUATION 

(FIELD TRAINING) 

ANNUAL GENERAL INSPECTIONS 

Copies of 4,370- reports of annual general inspections, 

which contain the rating awarded each unit at its annual 

armory inspection, were submitted to the Bureau for 

review. These inspections are conducted for the respective 

Army Area Commanders by officers detailed as inspectors 

general. Their general purpose is to ascertain whether 

equipment issued to the National Guard is being maintained correctly, proper quantities of equipment are on 

hand, units are properly organized, officers and enlisted 

personnel are qualified, records are properly maintained, 

and training is conducted as prescribed. All federally 

recognized ARNG units are inspected annually. Results 

of these armory inspections for the past five fiscal years are 

shown below. 

ANNUAL GENERAL INSPECTIONS 

[ARMORY TRAINING) 

SCHOOL PROGRAM 

The ARNG School Program is designed to provide progressive military education and appropriate practical training for officers and enlisted men. School training augments 

and reinforces armory training and annual field training. 

It enables personnel to perform efficiently in all positions 

of leadership, and in applying current tactics, techniques, 

and doctrine. Graduates return to their units and instruct 

other personnel. 

The Army National Guard school program consists of 

three principal facets: Army Service Schools and their 

Army extension courses, Army Area Schools, and Officer 

Candidate Schools. 

a. Service Schools. The principal activity is the Army 

Service School Program. Here priority is given to the 

training of newly commissioned second lieutenants in their 

Basic Branch Course, attendance of field grade officers at 

Branch Advanced Courses, and the Command and General Staff College for senior commanders and their staffs. 

Service schooling is also provided for enlisted personnel 

to insure their professional and technical progress. During 

FY 1960, 8,132 officers and men attended Service School 

courses which varied in length from one week to ten 

months. The planned input was exceeded by 1 I percent 

due primarily to the necessity for retraining personnel 

whose branch of service changed under ARNG. reorganization. 

b. Army Area Schools. Army Area Schools primarily 

provide basic enlisted specialist courses such as those for 

auto mechanics, clerks, and cooks. 

c. Officer Candidate Schools. That part of the School 

Program of which we are most proud is the Officer Candidate Schools. There are three officer candidate programs. 

An enlisted man may attend: 

(1) The 22-week active Army Officer Candidate Course. 

(2) A special 1 1-week Officers Candidate Course conducted by the active Army at Fort Benning, Georgia, and 

Fort Sill, Oklahoma. 

(3) A Department of Army accredited State Officer 

Candidate School. 

By 30 June 1960, 42 States and the District of Columbia had organized a State Officer Candidate School. The 

Army Infantry School prescribes the standards, provides 

the lesson material, and grades all examinations for these 

State schools. Calendar year 1960 enrollment in State 

Officer Candidate Schools approximated 2,400 cadets. 

d. Army Extension Courses. Officer and enlisted personnel continue to take full advantage of the Army Service 

School Extension Course Program. More than 30,000 

officers were actively engaged in this program during the 

year. In addition, approximately 13,000 enlisted men were 

enrolled in pre-commission extension courses. Although 

these latter courses no longer qualify an individual for a 

commission, enlisted personnel continue to participate for 

37 
self-education on selected subjects such as Map and Aerial 

Photograph Reading, Combat Intelligence, and Platoon 

Tactics. 

ARMY AVIATION 

a. Personnel. During FY I960, the number of ARNG 

aviators on flying status increased from 1.260 to 1,382, 

a net gain of 122 toward the current authorization of more 

than 3.000. Primary sources of aviator procurement 

were: 

(1) Guardsmen graduated from the U.S. Army Aviation School. 

(2) Recruitment of former rated officers of other 

services. 

b. Flying Hours. ARNG aircraft flying hours totaled 

160,342. This is an increase of 19,610 hours over FY 

1959. Approximately 35 percent of this time was accomplished during the annual field training periods. 

c. Schooling. Army service schools and civilian contract schools were used for training both officers and enlisted men in various aircraft maintenance skills and in 

primary, tactical, and advanced flying. During the year, 

77 individuals completed Army primary flight courses, 96 

completed the rotary wing qualification course, 1 14 completed the contract instrument flying course, 13 officers 

completed advanced technical courses, and 278 enlisted 

men completed aircraft maintenance courses. 

d. Other A total of 102 Army Guardsmen were on 

non-crew member flying status as of 30 June 1960. 

This included 3 flight surgeons and 99 aircraft maintenance supervisors. 

The accompanying chart shows 3-year growth in pilots 

and aircraft. 

ARMY ADVISORS 

As of 30 June 1960, 1,056 ARNG advisor spaces were 

filled by active Army officers. This number, 23 less than 

that assigned on 30 June 1959, represented 95.0 percent 

ARMY NAT'L GUARD AVIATION 

of the total minimum requirement. 

Status of Army National Guard Advisor 

Positions 30 June I960 

Branch 

Total 

Infantry 

Artillery 

Armor 

Engineer 

Ordnance 

Signal 

Medical 

Transportation 

Military Police 

Quartermaster 

Adjutant General 

A H (II Cuidm 

1215 

228 

446 

156 

72 

91 

97 

49 

51 

12 

8 

5 

c.S 

« = £ 

0 = : 

Y.s.X. 

1111 

228 

397 

146 

71 

65 

84 

46 

51 

10 

8 

5 

If 

1056 

255 

361 

156 

71 

52 

60 

38 

45 

10 

6 

2 

95.0 

111.8 

90.9 

106.8 

100.0 

80.0 

71.4 

82.6 

88.2 

100.0 

75.0 

40.0 

Major 

()omrr| 

Author 

1195 

313 

408 

171 

66 

64 

66 

39 

49 

12 

7 

— 

\ 0 

107.6 

137.3 

102.8 

117.1 

93.0 

98.5 

78.6 

84.8 

96.1 

120.0 

87.5 

— 

Although most branches were manned at acceptable 

levels, the shortages in Artillery, Ordnance, and Signal 

are of primary concern from a training standpoint. Continued shortages in these areas are anticipated due to the 

impending loss of a large number of field grade officers 

and the inability of the Army to support all CONUS stabilized positions. The Army Officers Assignment Directorate is endeavoring to meet ARNG requirements from 

the qualified personnel available and in accordance with 

Department of the Army priority for ARNG advisor duty. 

Of further significance are the lower authorizations established by the Army Commanders as related to the numbers authorized by current regulations. 

As indicated on the accompanying chart, the minimum 

number of Army advisors required by the National Guard 

Bureau within AR 61 1-50 and RCTB 60 authorization is 

shown as 100 percent; the percentage of advisors assigned 

by the bars; and the authorizations by Army Commanders 

are indicated by the tick marks. 

ARMY ADVISORS 

[30JUN 60) 

38 

BRANCH 

INFANTRY 

ARTILLERY 

ENGINEER 

ORDNANCE 

SIGNAL 

TRANS 

MIL POLICE 

QM 

AG 

lUfA L 

R'j*T 

K2I 

397 

146 

71 

66 

84 

46 

91 

10 

8 

5 

lll l 

O n 25 % 50 % 78 % 

A C " 

^•••^••^••B A 

1 A 

•4" 

A 

i 1 

100% I1BK, 

u 

1 

k 

A 

HjTHOftl 

BEO'-IRCD 

A 

137% 

ED 
Types of ARNG Aircraft 

H-19 Chickasaw H-13 Sioux H-21 Shawnee 

JB "*^_ 

L-23 Seminole 

YH-40 (H-UIA) Iroquois 

H-34 Choctaw 

L-20 Beaver 
istics 

EQUIPMENT 

The Bureau received very limited quantities of new 

equipment for distribution to ARNG units during FY 

1960. Redistribution of major items to meet the requirements of new or reorganized units continued throughout 

the year. Shortages of some types of equipment had an 

adverse effect on certain training. 

Engineer. Sufficient quantities of shop equipment, 

electrical repair equipment, and 10 and 20-ton crane 

shovels were made available to satisfy the training requirements of Engineer units. I he shortage of bridging equipment and medium and heavy tractors were a deterrent to 

the training program. 

Ordnance. A limited quantity of 155-mm and 8-in. 

towed howitzers, 2'/4-ton dump trucks, 5-ton truck tractors, 40-mm self-propelled guns, 106-mm recoilless rilles 

ami light tanks were made available for distribution. 

Army National Guard units had 76 percent of the required number of Ordnance items on hand on 30 June 
1960. However, the shortage of armored personnel carriers, recoilless ritles, self-propelled artillery, and some 

types of wheeled vehicles continued to hamper effective 

training. 

The program to exchange M47 tanks for the more 

modern M48s which commenced in FY 1958 was virtually 

complete in FY I960. 

Quartermaster. The balance of the Army Green uniforms required to completely uniform the ARNG were 

procured during the year. Sufficient quantities of combat 

boots and field uniforms (OG 107) were procured to 

provide each enlisted man. where required by the States. 

with the full allowance (2 pair combat boots and 3 sets 

summer field uniforms). The overcoats (OG 107) on 

hand are less than half of the national requirements. Only 

20 percent of the winter work uniforms (OG 108.) have 

been provided to meet requirements of even the 30 Northern States. Two poplin shirts were provided each enlisted 

man for wear with the Army Green (AG 44) uniforms. 

The Bureau continued to screen clothing and items of 

individual equipment reported excess by the States and 

applied these assets against the needs of other States. 

Signal. Limited quantities of World War II type radiorelay and terminal equipment were made available as 

substitutes for authorized area communications equipment. 

The shortage of central office sets, radar, and those communication items for Corps and Field Army communications systems pose the most serious training equipment 

problems facing the ARNG. 

Transportation. Floating marine equipment required 

by the Transportation Corps marine units in the States pf 

Washington and Wisconsin was provided during the year. 

The ARNG aircraft inventory on 30 June 1960 included 

645 fixed wing aircraft, 270 reconnaissance type helicopters, and 40 Might simulators. This represents a loss 

of \4 fixed wing and a gain of 86 helicopters during the 

fiscal year shown by the "Army National Guard Aviation" 

Chart. 

DISPOSITION OF EXCESS PROPERTY 

ARNG activities reported property with a value of 

$122,216,328 as excess during FY I960. An additional 

$59,381,055 in excess property was carried over from the 

previous fiscal year for a total of $ 18 1.597.383. Disposal 

was made of $147,857,043 in excess property during FY 

I960, leaving $33,470,340 carried over into FY 1961. 

The following table shows in detail the disposition of 

excess property during FY 1960, which is graphically 
represented in the "Disposition of Excess Property" Chart 

on page 14. 

DISPOSITION OF EXCESS AND SURPLUS 

PROPERTY IN FISCAL YEAR 1960 

Withdrawn by preparing installation 

Redistributed within Department of Army 

Returned to Depot Stock 

Transferred to Department of the Navy 

Transferred to Department of the Air Force 

Transferred to Agencies outside Department of 

Defense with reimbursement 

Transferred to Agencies outside Department of 

Defense without reimbursement 

Transferred to PDO 

Transferred to Foreign Governments 

Other transfers 

Destroyed by Property Officers 

Determined to be Surplus 

Other Inventory decreases 

TOTAL 

Exc ess and Surplus 

$ 20,604,568 

13,981,183 

72,335,111 

254,722 

1,022,493 

61,302 

2,638,934 

31,422,307 

65,980 

4,740 

5,465,703 

$147,857,043 

MAINTENANCE 

Progress continued during FY 60 in equipment maintenance. The continued training program and provision 

of additional facilities resulted in improved maintenance 

as reflected in the inspection ratings. 

Maintenance was again an important part of the Army 

Area conferences conducted by the Bureau in the six 

Army areas during September, October, November, and 

December 1959. These conferences were attended by 

maintenance personnel from each State, Army Area headquarters, supporting technical services and depots, and 

the Bureau. Policies, programs, and problems were 

discussed. 

NGR 76 and NGB Pamphlet 76-1 developed by a special board of general officers and state maintenance officers, 

have greatly assisted the field in day-to-day management, 

repair, and servicing of ARNG equipment. This board 

also reviewed personnel patterns and made recommendations which were placed in effect during the last quarter 

of the year. Final personnel adjustments are scheduled 

for completion by 1 March 1961. 

Organizational Maintenance 

Continued emphasis on the requirement for organizational integrity with command responsibility resulted in 

greatly improved organizational maintenance. Commanders were aided by the construction of additional 

organizational maintenance shops and administrative 

storage compounds. As of 30 June 1960, 869 such shops 

and storage compounds were authorized. An estimated 

218 shops are yet to be constructed. 

Field Maintenance 

Workload in the combined field maintenance shops continued to increase. This was due to ARNG reorganization, 

increase in equipment density, exchange and receipt of 

"not ready for issue" equipment, and continued requirement for modification work orders. 

Maintenance and Operating 

Supplies 

As reported by the States, the cost of maintenance and 

operating supplies consumed during the year was approximately $8,516,000. This was an increase of 10 percent 

over FY 1959. This increase was due to aging of equipment, issue of additional equipment, changes in troop 

requirements, and receipt of "not ready for issue" equipment. 
Installations 

During FY 1960, approximately $16.6 million was 

obligated by the various States as the Federal contribution 

supporting construction of ARNG armory and non-armory 

facilities. This Federal support has been available each 

year since 1952 under the provisions of the National Defense Facilities Act of 1950. Facilities placed under contract in FY I960 are as follows: 

NON-ARMORY 

ARMORY 

Total Armory Projects 

Complete Armories 

Expansions 

Conversions 

Rehabilitations 

Tolal Armory Obligations 

105 

14 

7 

2 

128 

$15,667,531 

Total Non-Armory Projects 

USPFO Offices 

Tng. Facilities 

Warehouses 

Shop Hangars 

Organizational Maint. Shops 

Total Non-Armory Obligations 

TOTAL 

3 

1 

1 

1 

5 

11 

S 461.532 

$16,629,063 

CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 

A complete State-by-State study conducted in 1959, 

based on ARNG reorganization to the new Pentomic concept determined that there was an overall requirement 

for 2,732 armory facilities to adequately house all units. 

43 
As shown below, by 30 June 1960, 893 of this requirement remained for future construction. 

TOTAL ARMORY FACILITIES 

30 JUNE 60 

2732 

729 

ADEQUATE 

(STATE OWNED) 

FED CONSTD REMAIN ROMT 

FY 61 FWD 

A breakdown of the 893 remaining requirement for 

construction in FY 1961 and future years is also shown 

below. 

ARMORY PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 

FY 1961 FORWARD 

TOTAL RQMT 

FISCAL 61 FORWARD 

Approximately $239 million is the total Federal contribution required for the armory construction program. 

Of this, Congress has appropriated $143.2 million through 

FY 1960, leaving 95.8 million as the remaining appropriation requirement for FY 1961 and future years. 

STATE MATCHING FUNDS 

Under existing legislation the States must provide a 

minimum of 25 percent of the cost of armory construction 

in addition to providing a suitable site at no cost to the 

Federal Government. As of 30 June 1960, "State Matching Funds" in excess of $17.5 million were available. To 

fully utilize this amount of State funds, a Federal contribution in excess of $52.5 million would be required. 

ARMORY CONSTRUCTION 

OBLIGATIONS 

The chart below shows armory construction obligations 

under the provisions of the National Defense Facilities Act 

of 1950, as amended, from FY 1953 through FY 1960. 

ARMORY CONSTRUCTION OBLIGATIONS 

26 7M; 

f 

I7.5M ' 

•'•" >T 

.3IM, 

I5.7M 

, M < 

' 5 3 '54 '55 '56 '57 '58 '5 9 '6 0 

NON-ARMORY CONSTRUCTION 

Also under the provisions of the National Defense 

Facilities Act of 1950, approximately $22.0 million has 

been obligated for non-armory construction. This includes: 

36 Combined Field Maintenance Shops 

106 Organizational Maintenance Shops 

20 Warehouses 

15 U.S. Property and Fiscal Offices 

33 Shop Hangars 

Troop Facilities at Field Training Sites 

REAL PROPERTY 

The Bureau renders all possible assistance to the States 

in licensing appropriate Federally owned facilities and in 

leasing certain types of privately owned facilities for 

ARNG use. 

Through FY 1960 the ARNG was utilizing the following facilities: 

154 Federally owned installations under license 

221 Privately owned facilities under Federal lease, 

including: 

64 Army Advisor Offices 

69 Target Range sites 

75 Liaison Plane facilities 

4 Armory facilities for former SCARWAF* 

Units 

* Special category Army with Air Force units transferred back 

to Army National Guard control I March 1956. 

44 
The Bureau screened excess federally owned real properties with the States, advising and assisting them in the 

acquisition of such properties when required by the 

ARNG. 

REPAIRS AND UTILITIES 

Approximately $2,893,000 was obligated under service 

contract agreements with the States to maintain and operate 17,208,000 square feet of armory, organizational 

maintenance shop, combined field maintenance shop, aviation shop hangar, warehouse, and USPFO office space 

including supporting site facilities. 

Approximately $174,200 was obligated to maintain and 

repair 1 17 small arms firing ranges. 

Approximately $3,562,000 was obligated to support 

major repair, minor new construction, alteration and improvement of ARNG logistical and annual field training 

site facilities. This included the establishment of 50 new 

administrative storage compounds and the construction 

of 92 organizational maintenance shops for storage and 

maintenance of vehicle equipment at battalion level. 

FIELD TRAINING INSTALLATIONS 

Approximately $4,230,300 was obligated to support the 

opening, operating and closing of annual field training sites 

used by the ARNG. Of this amount $916,500 was obligated for 30 State controlled training sites and $3,313,800 

for 64 federally controlled training sites, as follows: 

FEDERALLY CONTROLLED 

INSTALLATIONS 

Fort McClellan. Ala. 

Fort Richardson. Alaska 

Fort Chaffee. Ark. 

Fort Huachuca, Ariz. 

Benicia Arsenal, Calif. 

Camp Irvin, Calif. 

Camp Roberts, Calif. 

Fort McArthur. Calif. 

Fort Ord, Calif. 

Los Angeles Defense Missile 

Sites, Calif. 

San Francisco Defense 

Missiles Sites, Calif. 

Sharpe General Depot. Calif. 

Sierra Ordnance Depot, Calif. 

Fort Carson, Colo. 

Stratford-Bridgeport Defense 

Missile Site. Conn. 

Atlanta General Depot, Ga. 

Fort Benning, Ga. 

Fort Gordon. Ga. 

Fort Stewart, Ga. 

Savannah River Project, Ga. 

Schofield Barracks. Hawaii 

Chicago Defense Missile Sites, 

III. 

Granite City Engr. Depot, 

Granite City, 111. 

Fort Riley, Kansas 

Camp Breckinridge, Ky. 

Fort Knox, Ky. 

Callender Field. La. 

Camp Leroy Johnson. La. 

Fort Polk, La. 

Baltimore. Md-Washington, 

D. C. Defense Missile Sites 

Fort Holabird, Md. 

Fort Meade, Md. 

Boston, Mass. Providence, R. I. 

Defense Missile Sites 

Camp Wellfleet. Mass. 

Fort Devens. Mass. 

Detroit Defense Missile 

Mich. 

Selfridge AFB. Mich. 

Camp Drum. N. Y. 

Niagara-Buffalo Defense 

sile Sites. N. Y. 

New York City Defense 

sile Sites. N. Y. 

Fort Bragg, N. C. 

Cleveland Defense Missile Site, 

Ohio 

Fort Sill, Okla. 

Sites, 

MisMisIndiantown Gap Military Reservation. Pa. 

Letterkenny Ordnance Depot. 

Elbertson. Pa. 

New Cumberland General Depot. Pa. 

Philadelphia Defense Missile 

Sites, Pa. 

Pittsburgh Defense Missile 

Sites, Pa. 

Salinas Training Area. P. R. 

Fort Jackson, S. C. 

Fort Campbell, Tenn. 

Fort Bliss. Tex. 

Fort Hood, Tex. 

Camp A. P. Hill. V», 

Fort Belvoir. Va. 

Fort Eustis. Va. 

Fort Lee, Va. 

Norfolk Defense Missile Sites, 

Va. 

Fort Storey. Va. 

Fort Lewis. Wash. 

Seattle Defense Missile Sites, 

Wash. 

Yakima Firing Center. Wash. 

Camp McCoy. Wis. 

Milwaukee Defense Missile 

Sites, Wis. 

STATE CONTROLLED INSTALLATIONS 

Camp Robinson, Ark. 

Camp Ribicoff. Conn. 

Bethany Beach. Del. 

Gowen Field. Idaho 

Palisades, Idaho 

Camp Dodge, Iowa 

Frankfort. Ky. 

Camp Keyes, Maine 

Camp Curtis Guild, Mass. 

Camp Grayling. Mich. 

Camp Ripley, Minn. 

Camp Shelby. Miss. 

Jefferson Barracks, Mo. 

Fort William Henry Harrison. 

Mont. 

Camp Ashland. Nebr. 

Camp Dwinell. N. H. 

New Jersey Training Center 

Sea Girt, N. J. 

Camp Smith, N. Y. 

Camp Grafton. No. Dakota 

Camp Perry. Ohio 

Camp Rilea. Ore. (formerly 

Camp Clatsop) 

Fort Varnum. R. I. 

Camp Rapid, S. Dakota 

Camp Mabry, Tex. 

Camp Williams, Utah 

State Military Reservation, Va. 

Camp Johnson, Vt. 

Camp Murray. Wash. 

C .imp Dawson, W. Va. 

Camp Guernsey, Wyo. 

Army Area Conferences 

The Bureau conducted fruitful conferences in each 

Army Area for the fifth consecutive year. In addition to 

the Adjutant General and his key staff officers from each 

State, representatives from the Army Area and from industry participated. In these conferences the Bureau conveyed directly to the States the most current information 

concerning personnel management, organization and training, armory construction, supply, maintenance, army aviation, and budgeting and funding. 

These conferences also provided the important opportunity to discuss State problems with responsible State 

officials. 

45 
AIR 

NATIONAL GUARD 

•••••••••••••••••••••••• • 

THE 

NATI )NAL GUARD 

WITH THE 

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE 

FOREWORD 

The Air National Guard is in formation with the 

United States Air Force because we: 

a. Use the same supply system as the Air Force. 

b. Train under the same exacting standards. 

c. Fly the same aircraft as many like regular units, and 

d. Attend the same technical and service schools. 

To effectively carry out our assigned mission, we must 

not only be "In Formation" but we must stay "In Formation" with USAF. 

To provide an even closer relationship between USAF 

and ANG, a new plan for management of the Air Reserve 

Forces was developed during the year. Under this new 

plan, responsibility for supervision of training and inspections is assigned to the major Air Force commands 

under which ANG units would serve in an emergency. 

(See Management Improvements.) 

As one reviews the following pages relating to the ANG 

program it is quite evident that the past year will be 

recorded as another period of continued progress and 

success in the ANG. 

• Operational readiness has shown a steady rate of 

improvement. 

• Conversions to more modern and complex aircraft, 

such as the F-100, F-102, F-104, and C-97, have 

been met with great skill, determination, and effectiveness. 

• Reorganizations have been accomplished to realign 

ANG unit structures to conform to like active Air 

Force units. 

• Military manning and training objectives are being 

advanced to the maximum extent possible within 

financial resources capability. 

• The facilities program continues to show improvement. 

• In general, the Air Guard has moved forward on all 

fronts. 

46 
Comptroller Functions 

In FY I960 the appropriation structure for the Air 

National Guard changed from one single appropriation 

which included Major Procurement, Military Construction, Operation and Maintenance, and Military Personnel, 

to three separate appropriations. The new appropriations 

structure includes Military Construction, ANG; Operation 

and Maintenance, ANG; and National Guard Personnel, 

Air Force. Major procurement requirements, formerly 

incorporated in the single ANG appropriation, were included in the Major Procurement appropriation of the 

active Air Force. This change in appropriation structure 

precluded the transfer of funds between programs which 

had been possible under the single appropriation. 

Under this new structure Congress appropriated funds 

totaling $233,440,000, of which 97.5 percent was obligated. A breakout by appropriation and obligation, as of 

30 June I960, is as follows: 

Program Appropriated Obligations 

TOTAL 

Military Construction. ANG ' 

Operation and Maintenance, ANG ' 

National Guard Personnel. AF-

$233,440,000 $227,580,822 

16,440,000 11,453,802 

169,000,000 168,236.533 

48,000,000 47.890.4X7 

1

 No year funds, unobligated balance available for lubiequent yean. 

- One year funds. 

The original FY 1960 budget estimate as submitted 

provided for conversions of 4 squadrons to Century series 

aircraft, 1 squadron to F-89H, 6 to F-89J, and 8 to 

F-86L's for a total of 19 conversions. However there were 

"^^•••^aw 

5 conversions to Century series aircraft instead of 4 and 

in addition 6 squadrons were converted to C-97s making 

a total of 26 conversions instead of 19, an increase of 7 

more than budgeted for. 

These conversions to higher performance and more 

modern and complex aircraft resulted in a more costly 

operation. However, this was offset by a reduction in 

costs of aircraft fuel and lubricants, as well as maintenance spares, spare parts, and supplies which come with 

the aircraft. Therefore it was possible to make minor 

adjustments within the programs to absorb the costs of 

the 7 additional conversions. 

Personnel 

MILITARY STRENGTH 

On 30 June 1960, the federally recognized strength of 

the Air National Guard was 70,820. This figure was 

approximately 2 percent short of the programmed fiscal 

year end strength of 72,000. Total strength decreased 

174 below that of 30 June 1959; officer strength increased 

97, airman strength decreased 271. 

For comparison purposes, ANG personnel strengths 

for FY 1946 through FY 1960 are shown below. 

ANG PERSONNEL GROWTH 

TO , 

60 

Z 

'i SO 

g 4 0 

Z 

30 , 

47 

* > , 

10 

71,000 

58,000 

1948 SO M 54 56 

FISCAL YEARS , 
PROCUREMENT OF MILITARY 

PERSONNEL 

Approximately 93 percent of the officers procured to 

fill existing vacancies during the year came from four 

sources: Air Force Reserve, direct commission of ANG 

airmen, professional individuals from civil life, and the 

ANG Aviation Cadet Program. 

The decrease in airman strength was primarily due to 

more selective recruitment during FY I960 and elimination of personnel with sub-standard drill attendance 

records prior to field training during the last two months 

of the fiscal year. Again this year, there has been a trend 

toward enlisting older non-prior service airmen. Airmen 

gains (non-prior, by age group, and prior service) are 

shown below for FYs 1956 through 1960. 

PERCENT 

OF 

GAINS 

ANG AIRMEN GAINS FY 56-F Y 60 

LEGEND 

NONPRIOR SERVICE 

AGE GROUP 

17-18 1/2 Q 

18 i/2 & OVER CS 

PRIOR SERVICE Q i 

f] 

m 

In FY 1956, only one of seven non-prior service recruits 

was over 18 V2 years old, but by FY 1959 six out of seven 

were over I8V2. This age group change began after draft 

deferment was extended in 1957 from ages 17-18'/2 to 

17-25. As a result of recruiting older, more stable airmen, 

the attrition rate dropped from 23 percent in Fiscal Year 

1956 to 19 percent in Fiscal Year 1960. 

During the year 80 percent of the airmen whose enlistments had expired reenlisted without a break in service. 

ANG reenlistment rates compared with those of the active 

Air Force establishment are shown below for FYs 1957 

through 1960. 

A N G AIRMEN REENLISTMENT RATES 

p«rc«nt 

90 

ao 

70 

60 

50 

40 

80% 78% 

ANG 

USAF 

80% 

49% 62% 48% 

NOTE: For additional data regarding ANG officer and 

airman personnel, such as: grade distribution (assigned 

vs authorized); average age of personnel by grade; average years of service by grade, and airmen losses by type 

and grade, see appendix. 

AIR TECHNICIANS 

THE AIR TECHNICIAN 

1$ our diamond btcause 

RESPONSIBL E 

PRODUCTIV E 

CAPABL E 

,.£& 

ANG technicians continued their high level of accomplishment. During the year all States were restricted to 

98 percent employment of their authorization. Budget 

and manpower space limitations imposed by Department 

of Defense resulted in a decrease in the number employed 

from 13,342 on 30 June 1959 to 13, 158 on 30 June 1960. 

Personnel have been realigned and the emphasis placed 

in the critical areas. Below is shown the Air Technician 

support as of 30 June 1960. 19% of the 71,000 Air 

Guardsmen are technicians. 

ANG AIR TECHNICIAN SUPPORT 

TOTAL PERSONNEL OF 71,000 

AIRCRAFT 

MAINTENANCE 

SUPPORT^ 

ADM. SUPPORT 

V / 

65% 35% 

-19%-

AIRMAN PROFICIENCY TESTING 

Airman Proficiency Tests (APTs) measure technical 

job-knowledge and are used in conjunction with other 

48 

1958 1959 1960 
criteria for upgrading to the next higher skill level of airmen specialties. 

In FY 60, APTs were administered to 12,095 airmen. 

There has been a significant decline in percentage of passing scores for APTs administered during the past 3 years. 

Frequent reorganizations, many resulting in complete 

change of mission and equipment, and accelerated effort 

to raise combat readiness are partially accountable for 

this decline. These factors have resulted in premature testing of airmen being cross-trained into a new specialty. 

Through concentrated effort to ascertain causes in local 

situations and providing specialized guidance, results are 

expected to improve in the forthcoming year. 

Other Testing. Various other personnel research tests 

are utilized by the ANG for determining qualifications of 

applicants for commissioning, selection of qualified persons for enlistment, initial classification of airmen, and 

progression of airmen from the 7 to 9 level of the Air 

Force Specialty Code (AFSC). During FY 1960, new 

editions of the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test and the 

Airman Qualifying Examination, used for screening officer 

and airman applicants, were implemented. Qualification 

on the USAF Supervisory Examination is required for 

progression from the 7 fo the 9 level of the AFSC, which is 

prerequisite to promotion to pay grades E-8 or E-9. During FY 1960, 1,032 supervisory examinations were administered, and qualifying scores were achieved on 67.2 

percent. 

OFFICER PROMOTIONS 

During FY 1960, eight colonels were appointed to 

brigadier general, all for tenure of office for duty as 

Assistant Adjutant General. 

Unit vacancy promotions to the grade of major and 

lieutenant colonel remained frozen due to strength overages in these grades. This suspension has been in force 

since 1 July 1955, but will be relieved by legislation which 

became effective on 30 June 60 (ROPA). Authorized 

vacancies in the grades of colonel and captain were filled 

by promotion of qualified officers. 

Action of the 1960 mandatory selection boards resulted in the following selections and deferments: 

Deferred 

1st 2d 

Considered Selected Time Time 

TOTAL 639 557 70 12 

1st Lt to captain Board not held during Fiscal Year 1960 

Captain to major 410 377 27 6 

Major to lieutenant 

colonel 229 180 43 6 

The accompanying chart provides comparison on mandatory selection and deferment of ANG officers during 

fiscal years 1959 and 1960. 

OFFICER EFFECTIVENESS REPORTS 

A concentrated effort was made during FY 1959 and 

MANDATORY PROMOTION AND DEFERRED OFFICER COMPARISON 

M M M FY 59 AND FY 60 w „„ 

FY 1960 to improve the quality of effectiveness reports on 

Air National Guard officers. Emphasis was placed on 

closer observation by the rating officer and the preparation 

of objective, fully justified, and well organized reports. 

Cooperation of the States in this effort was reflected in 

more realistic effectiveness reporting and rating trends 

which compare more favorably with those of the active 

Air Force. It is believed that improved quality of Air 

National Guard reports has contributed directly to reducing ROPA promotion deferrals among ANG officers to a 

rate approximately equal to that for Reserve of the Air 

Force officers on extended active duty. This project was 

scheduled to be continued in FY 1961. 

WARRANT OFFICER POSITIONS 

During FY 60 Warrant Officer Air Force Specialty 

Codes (AFSC) were deleted from the manning documents. 

As a result all Warrant Officers currently assigned have 

been converted to company grade AFSCs. The various 

states have until 31 December 1960 to assign Warrant 

Officers to existing vacant company grade positions. 

PROMOTION OF AIRMEN TO PAY 

GRADE E-8 

The first promotions to pay grade E-8 were effected during FY I960. Of the 1604 E-8 and E-9 positions authorized the Air National Guard, 360 spaces were filled 

by promotion of qualified airmen to pay grade E-8. Due 

to time in-grade requirements, no airmen were eligible for 

promotion to pay grade E-9 during this year. 

RETIREMENT RECORDS 

In the past, individuals who applied for retirement were 
subjected to long delays while Headquarters USAF collected data upon which to base retirement eligibility. To 

reduce this waiting time, as well as to assure that an 

individual is credited with service which he has performed, the Bureau instituted during FY 1960 a program 

of emphasis on correct preparation and distribution of 

retirement records for ANG officers. Also, a series of 

conferences were held on the subject of airmen retirement 

records. As a result, each State began a campaign to complete retirement records of airmen under its jurisdiction. 

Most States completed this project by the end of FY 1960. 

A new unit was established in the Bureau's Air Personnel 

Division to control and assure continued correctness of 

officer retirement records. 

Medical Activities 

Significant progress was made during the year toward 

enhancing the operational capability of the Air National 

Guard Medical Service. The high level of interest and 

participation in the program, esprit de corps, and major 

advancements that have been realized are the end product 

of positive actions to provide the medical units and elements with active missions and modern facilities. This has 

played an important part in attracting into the program the 

desired calibre of well-motivated professional personnel. 

On an overall basis, Medical Service manning and combat operational capabilities have progressed beyond the 

minimum Ready Reserve requirements. Factors contributing to this improvement include: (1) a higher ratio of 

officers assigned, (2) continued emphasis on the program 

for modernizing medical facilities, (3) procurement of 

the necessary diagnostic and therapeutic equipment and 

supplies, (4) a broadening of the scope of the medical 

functions and responsibilities, and (5) a raising of the 

professional and technical capabilities of personnel and 

units through formal and unit training programs. 

ORGANIZATION 

The ANG Medical Service is organized to provide 

medical personnel and units trained and equipped to operAIR NATIONAL GUARD MEDICAL SERVICE 

EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL STATUS 

BY GAINING COMMANDS 

OPERATIONAL READINESS CAPABILITY 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD MEDICAL SERVICE UNITS 

PERCENT 

100 

TACTICAL USAF AEROMEDICAL 

HOSPITALS DISPENSARIES EVACUATION 

#0/ R OF 73 % DUE TO ACFT MODIFICATION & TNG OUOTAS 

AVAILABLE FOR AEROMCOICAL CREWS 

50 
ate medical facilities in support of ANG operational needs 

including aeromedical evacuation. 

The Medical Service is comprised of 65 units and 42 

elements, made up as follows: 

Units: 11 tactical hospitals, 48 USAF dispensaries, 1 

aeromedical transport group, 5 aeromedical transport 

squadrons. 

Elements serve with the following ANG units: 19 with 

tactical fighter and reconnaissance squadrons, 4 with troop 

carrier squadrons, 1 with air transport squadron (light), 2 

with tactical control groups, 9 with AC&W squadrons, 

and 7 with AC&W flights. 

NEW UNITS PROPOSED 

During the past year the ANG developed and demonstrated its capability to accept increased Medical Service 

responsibilities and requirements if current or future wartime planning should warrant such action. To this end, 

a proposed plan was submitted to the Surgeon General, 

USAF, indicating ANG resources and capabilities, and our 

desire to actively participate in a program toward meeting 

total requirements in the medical support areas. The proposed plan was favorably received, and it was indicated 

that initially 3,000 additional personnel spaces would be 

allocated to the ANG in order to organize medical units 

necessary for mobilization requirements. The Surgeon 

General designated a project officer to work with the ANG 

in effecting necessary changes in programs, manpower allocations and budgetary requirements. 

The two wings of tactical fighters converted to air transport wings, heavy, during the year have an aeromedical 

evacuation capability. Therefore Headquarters USAF concurred in a proposal to fulfill aeromedical evacuation requirements by authorizing one aeromedical transport 

squadron for each air transport wing, heavy. The aeromedical evacuation squadrons were programmed for 

activation and organization in fiscal year 1961. 

MEDICAL ADVISERS 

Requirements were submitted to Headquarters USAF 

for aeromedical evacuation adviser personnel for the aeromedical transport groups and the two air transport wings, 

heavy. As of 30 June 1960 these requirements had been 

approved by Hq USAF but had not been incorporated in 

manning authorizations for the gaining command, the 

Military Air Transport Service (MATS). Efforts are 

being made to assign qualified personnel to adviser positions as soon as possible. 

C-119 MODIFICATION 

The C-119 aircraft currently assigned to the ANG's 

five aeromedical transport squadrons do not fully meet 

minimum requirements for the aeromedical evacuation of 

patients. In order to perform the emergency evacuation of 

patients arid to conduct necessary training for medical 

crews, modification was begun on one aircraft in each 

squadron. The modification includes measures to reduce 

noise and vibration, and installation of snap-in airline . 

seats, toilets, and inflight food facilities. It is anticipated 

that this project will be completed early in the second 

quarter of FY 1961. 

MANNING REVISIONS 

Manning authorizations were revised for USAF' dispensaries, tactical hospitals, and medical elements organic 

to separate tactical air transport and troop carrier squadrons. The revisions were designed to fulfill medical supMEOICAL SERVICE MANNING LEVELS - BY CATEGORIES 

PERCENT 

100 

MC DC MSC AFNC VC AH TOTAL 
port operational needs, and where indicated, to eliminate 

authorization for non-essential personnel. 

NUCLEAR CASUALTY PROGRAM 

The Department of Defense and the Air Force Medical 

Materiel Program for Nuclear Casualties was implemented 

in the ANG during the year. Instructions were issued 

regarding the scope of training that will be accomplished 

for nonmedical care, commonly known as the "Buddy 

system." Phase I Medical Materiel for the above program 

was being procured, and it was planned to complete the 

equipping program in FY 1961 for all ANG flying bases. 

In addition, arrangements were made to procure training 

kits to be used with this program. 

MEDICAL SEMINAR 

The Second Medical Seminar was held 20-21 April 

1960, in conjunction with the ANG Commanders Conference at Ellington AFB, Texas. Considering that ANG 

Medical Service personnel must make arrangements for 

the care of their private practices, the attendance of 73 

officers from ANG units, plus representatives from TAC 

and MATS, was considered excellent. Presentations included progress in overall operational capability, manning 

and equipping requirements, utilization of allocated funds 

for medical support, modification and modernization of 

medical facilities, and future programming and operational objectives. Participants discussed major problem 

areas and contributed valuable suggestions toward solutions. These seminars have afforded Medical Service personnel an opportunity to become more familiar with the 

operational requirements and problems of the U.S. Air 

Force and ANG, and have made significant contributions 

toward improvements in program management. 

Operations and Training 

ORGANIZATION 

As of 30 June 1960 the Air National Guard consisted 

of 546 federally recognized units, 21 less than on 30 June 

1959. This reduction resulted from conversions noted 

below. 

The ANG tactical organization, as of 30 June 1960. 

consisted of 24 wings and 92 flying squadrons. See 

appendix H. 

1. Twenty-six ANG squadrons changed aircraft types 

during the year. These conversions ranged from relatively 

minor transitions—such as from the F-86D interceptor to 

the improved F-86L—to conversions unprecedented in 

ANG history from single engine jet fighters to global fourengine heavy transports. (See Par. 2 below.) The following table summarizes these conversions: 

AIRCRAFT CONVERSIONS FY 1960 

No. Conversions 

6 

5 

!>,><• Unit 

Ftr Intercep Sq 

Tac Ftr Sq 

Air Trans Sq (Heavy) 

:: :: : 

Air Trans Sq (L 

Tac Recon Sq 

: 

grit) 

A/C 

F-86D to F-86L 

F-89D to F-89J 

F-89H to F-89J 

F-94C to F-89J 

F-89DtoF-89H 

F-86LtoF-102A 

F-86LtoF-104A 

F-86HtoF-100C 

F-86HtoC-97 

F-86LtoC-97 

F-86D to C-97 

F-89HtoC-97 

C-47toC-123J 

RB-57B to RB-57A 

26 

2. Included in the above conversions, California's 146th 

Tactical Fighter Wing, and its 115th and 195th Tactical 

Fighter Squadrons and Oklahoma's 125th Fighter Interceptor Squadron, were redesignated Air Transport, Heavy. 

Minnesota's 133d Air Defense Wing and its 109th Fighter 

Interceptor Squadron, New Hampshire's 133d Fighter 

Interceptor Squadron, and New York's 139th Tactical 

Fighter Squadron, were redesignated Air Transport, Heavy. 

The fighter-type support structure of these units was 

retained pending development of manning documents for 

C-97 units. 

3. The 116th Fighter Interceptor Wing, Georgia, was 

reorganized to a structure compatible with other units in 

the Air Defense Command. 

4. The 1 17th Tactical Reconnaissance Wing, Alabama, 

the 123d Tactical Reconnaissance Wing, Kentucky, and 

52 
W^^^^im^'' '' -•^r-^^^^-M^^ 

the 127th Tactical Reconnaissance Wing. Michigan, were 

reorganized to the latest approved Tactical Air Command 

(TAC) organizational structure. 

5. Five tactical fighter wings were also reorganized to 

the new TAC organizational structure. They are the 108th, 

New Jersey; 113th, District of Columbia; 121st, Ohio; 

122d, Indiana, and 131st, Missouri. 

6. A new program for communications-electronics units 

was approved in the 3d quarter of FY 1960. This program 

is to be implemented in the 2d quarter of FY 1961, after 

completion of 1960 field training. All units and locations 

are retained in the new program with some changes in 

missions and gaining commands. 

COMMUNICATIONS UNIT CHANGES 

The new force structure changed the old by deleting 

one tactical control group and adding one communications 

group and four GEEIA units, which take their name from 

USAF's Ground Electronics Engineering Installation 

Agency. The planned activation of two Airways and Air 

Communications Service (AACS) mobile units, mentioned in last year's report, was abandoned in light of new 

requirements. As part of the new structure, one Air Force 

Reserve GEEIA unit at Tinker AFB, Oklahoma, will be 

transferred to the Oklahoma ANG. The remaining three 

GEEIA units being added to the existing 1 1 differ from the 

rest in that their primary role is to meet the emergency 

tactical operations requirement of an overseas command. 

The new communications-electronics force structure 

totals 75 units. 

53 
UNIT MISSION EQUIPMENT ANG COMMUNICATIONS UNITS 

30 IUNE 1959 VS 30 JUNE 1960 

COMMENTS 

The Unit Mil 

showed ; 

Equipment are a 

^^^^^^ ^ «e from 78 to 85% 

during the period of 30 June 1959 to 

30 June I960 for all Co: 

Units. 

TRAINING 

The Air National Guard unit and individual training 

program is divided into four major categories: air base, 

field, school, and supplemental training. School training 

includes pilot and navigator, basic military, and technical. 

AIR BASE TRAINING 

Forty-eight unit training assemblies are authorized annually for the conduct of air base training. Approximately 

8,100 officers and 56,200 airmen participated in the program at their home stations during the fiscal year, with a 

participation average of 95 percent of assigned officers 

and 90 percent of assigned airmen. All personnel on flying 

status were authorized 36 additional inactive duty flying 

training periods, to meet annual flying proficiency requirements and combat crew qualification. 

Training aids and devices were provided to the maximum extent possible to support the training programs. As 

rapidly as they became available, synthetic aircraft instrument trainers and flight simulators were assigned to tactical 

flying bases. In addition, USAF mobile training detachments were assigned to ANG units which converted to a 

new type of aircraft during the fiscal year. These detachments were assigned for periods of I to 6 months, depending upon the complexity of new aircraft. 

FIELD TRAINING 

Approximately 8,100 officers and 57,000 airmen participated in the annual 15-day field training exercises during the fiscal year, for an average attendance of 95 percent of the assigned officer strength and 9 1 percent of the 

assigned airmen strength. 

Twenty-three flying units remained at home station for 

field training, since most of the tactical fighter and air 

defense units either had adequate ranges available adjacent 

to their home station or were in an aircraft conversion 

status. Certain aeromedical units trained at home station 

near their Air Force advisory unit permitting ANG aeromedical transport aircrews to participate as crew members 

on Air Force aeromedical transport missions. 
Lack of an adequate range complex for tactical lighter 

units located in the northeastern United States required 

many units to operate through ANG held training sites 

or other bases located at a considerable distance from 

their home station in order to accomplish tactical weapons 

employment training. The National Guard Bureau continued its efforts to acquire an adequate range complex in 

the northeastern United States. 

The annual active duty for training of tactical control 

and communications groups placed emphasis on system 

deployment and wartime roles. All GFFIA squadrons performed training in installing outside plant facilities at Air 

Force bases. The two Communications Maintenance 

squadrons sent out teams for training at Air Force depots 

and at active Air Force AC'&W sites. 

Major gaining commands continued to furnish advisory 

teams to assist ANG units during their annual field training by providing guidance in latest tactics and procedures 

used by the active Air Force. Also, gaining commands 

provided instructor aircrews and ground support personnel 

to ANG units converting to Century series aircraft to 

accelerate the transition program for these units. 

SCHOOL TRAINING 

All non-prior service airmen were required, as a condition of enlistment, to complete USAF basic military training. In February I960, the duration of USAF basic military training was reduced from 9 to X weeks. 

The ANG continued to make progress in its pilot and 

navigator training programs, which in general consist of 

undergraduate flying training and advanced Hying training 

conducted by the Air Force for ANG officers and aviation 

cadets. 

Adequate spaces were provided in the Air Force Hying 

schools for the advanced training of all ANG lighterinterceptor pilots, and tactical lighter reconnaissance pilot 

trainees were given advanced training at Air Force Hying 

training schools following their graduation from basic flying training. Further qualification training in the mission 

aircraft was conducted by the parent ANG unit. Pilot 

trainees were also provided concentrated instrument training at the ANG Jet Instrument School. 

The ANG Jet Instrument School continued operation 

throughout the year. The student body was comprised of 

recent basic pilot graduates and pilots from jet units who 

had not recently attended a formal instrument Might course. 

Various familiarization courses, civilian factory courses, 

and special training courses were also made available to 

Air Guardsmen. It should be noted that adjustments in 

the training program during the year were required as a 

result of accelerated conversions to F-102, F-104. and 

C-97 aircraft by certain ANG units. Listed below are the 

number of individuals completing training in Fiscal Year 

I960 and who were in training as of 30 June I960 by various categories of training programs. 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

SCHOOL TRAINING 

Type of training 

Officer technical training 

Prior service airmen technical training 

Non-prior-scrvice airmen technical 

training 

Voluntary extended training program 

Eight weeks basic military training 

Pilot training 

Navigator training 

ANG Jet Instrument School 

rOTAL 

Completed 

ti aininjl 

during 

fiscal scar 

I960 

950 

1,363 

1.605 

234 

6.822 

69 

45 

224 

1 1,312 

In training 

as ,.f 

30 June 1960 

162 

517 

813 

94 

1.891 

33 

31 

12 

3.553 

SUPPLEMENTAL TRAINING 

Tactical reconnaissance units accomplished aerial photography missions for USAF, while aeromedical transportaircrews participated as crew members on USAF aeromedical transport missions, and troop carrier aircrews Hew 

long-range overwater navigation and cruise control missions. Aircrews were authorized a maximum of S days of 

active duty for training in order to accomplish these 

missions. 

To prepare for the smooth integration of ANG and the 

active military establishment in the event of a national 

emergency, the commander of each tactical Hying, aeromedical transport, troop carrier, tactical control, communications, and Airways and Air Communications Service unit was authorized to attend a 1-week orientation 

tour with his mobilization gaining command for the purpose of learning mobilization mission requirements. Also 

at these orientation periods, commanders become familiar 
with the latest operational equipment and receive indoctrination in current tactical concepts and operation procedures. 

Eight-day accelerated pilot transition periods were 

authorized for all tactical pilots in units which coin cited 

to new types of tactical aircraft and for all newly assigned 

pilots not qualified in their unit's primary mission aircraft. 

I hese concentrated transition periods are a vital safety 

factor in the initial operation of new aircraft and decrease 

considerably the time required for pilots to attain an operational readiness status. 

OPERATIONAL READINESS 

The most important product of ANG training and equipment is operational readiness. Operational readiness is a 

measurement of relative capability—the degree to which 

a unit is manned, equipped, and trained for the performance of its primary mission. In coordination with the 

gaining major Air Force commands. ANG has established 

realistic goals against which to measure progress toward 

major elements of operational readiness. These elements 

are aircraft ready, aircrew ready, personnel oilier than aircrews ready, and nun equipment ready. The goals on 

30 June 1959 vs. 30 June 1960, are shown on the accompanying charts. 

These scores show continued progress by our units. 

despite 26 aircraft model conversions during the year. 

Such conversions depress a unit's readiness to practically 

nothing because they must start from scratch with new 

training programs, checking out in new aircraft, and procuring new equipment. 

The latest scores indicate a high state of readiness, and 

the accelerated rate at which ANG units reached these 

peaks clearly demonstrates the adaptability and aggressive 

capability of our personnel. These achievements demonstrate the strengths that keep the Air National Guard a 

first line clement of defense. 

I l l Milium (Mi l HtllCIl FLTIHE SDIIIONS OPfllTIIIIL IEIIINESS 

II III! 1)5) is II III! Dil 

Pirelli 

m i -

ls 

Slh 

FLYING HOURS 

During FY I960, the ANG flew a total of 442,101 living hours of which 354,359 were Mown in jet aircraft and 

87,742 hours in reciprocating engine aircraft. This represented 97.1 percent of the flying hours programmed. 

Flying hours were retarded during the months of January 

and February due to extremely poor flying weather and 

icy runways over a section of the country. Another reason 

for the shortfall was the conversion of six F-86 squadrons 

to C-97 aircraft. 

FLYING SAFETY 

The ANG major accident rate for FY I960 was 11.7 

for each 100,000 flying hours completed, as compared 

with the previous low of 17.1 in FY 1959. (See chart.) 

The three lowest monthly rates were 6.1, zero, and 5.1 in 

December 1959. January 1960, and April I960 respectively. Major factors contributing to the ANG's improved 

Hying safety record include increased supervisory controls 

and the recognition by the supervisor of his responsibility, 

and the increased individual pilot proficiency and personal 

recognition of the entire theme and intent of the ANG 

flying safety program. Additional factors in improving the 

living safety record are the annual Flight Safety and Commanders Conference conducted by the Bureau's Assistant 

Chief for ANG; the increased number of flight safety 

survey teams made available by Headquarters USAF, and 

the high utilization of additional flying training periods. 

Headquarters USAF has awarded Hying safet) awards 

to four ANG squadrons for achievement of an outstanding 

safety record in preventing aircraft accidents. During the 

6-month period ending 31 December 1959, the two ANG 

squadrons selected as recipients of the Air Force highest 

peace-time safety award were the 112th Tactical Fighter 

Squadron, Toledo, Ohio, and the 125th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron. Tulsa, Oklahoma. The 112th, employing F-84Fs. had flown more than 3,055 flying hours during 

A I R NAII0NA L GUARD 

AIRCRAF T ACCIDEN T RATE 

PER 100 COOFLYINC HOURS 

100i9 0 -

56 
the award period and over 11.500 accident-free hours 

since its last major accident in July 1956. The 125th. 

Hying F-86Ls. had compiled more than 3,035 accidentfree hours for the same period and more than 14.850 Hying 

hours since its last major accident in July 1957. 

For the six months ending 30 June 1960, USAF awards 

went to the 134th Fighter Interceptor Squadron. Burlington. Vermont, and the 183d Aeromedical Transport 

Squadron. Jackson. Mississippi. 

Vermont's 134th squadron, operating F-89s. flew more 

than 2.800 hours without accident during the period, and 

had accumulated more than 15.000 jet hours since its last 

accident in November 1956. The 183d, flying C-119s, 

logged 1.600 accident-free hours in the award period, and 

some 15,000 hours since its last mishap in March 1956. 

JOINT EXERCISES 

Although ANG programs provide a maximum of formal 

training, the final training payoff comes from joint exercises conducted with the active military establishment. 

These are peacetime mission requirements of the active 

forces which can be performed as a by-product of ANG 

training programs for only a token increase in cost. They 

provide the most realistic training possible, while at the 

same time performing constructive and vital missions. 

The following are examples of ANG participation in joint 

exercises. 

A IR DEFENS E ALER T 

During FY 1960. 21 squadrons participated in the ANG 

Air Defense Alert Program. Seven of these squadrons 

performed alert coverage on a 24-hour schedule and 14 

squadrons on a 14-hour daylight basis. All the squadrons 

except one in Hawaii were located in the continental 

United States. 

These squadrons, which are located in certain strategically vital areas, provide aircraft, aircrews, and support personnel to augment ADC. During their duty tours, 

aircrews are on a 5-minute runway alert to intercept unidentified and potentially hostile aircraft. Valuable training benefits are realized by units engaged in these missions 

while they are at the same time contributing to defense of 

the United States. 

No. Hours Flown \ hei Number 

(

.ii ADC Alert Scramble* Intercept! 

FY 1960 22,037 14,465 22,945 

Total Since 1954 132.2.17 77.633 151.111 

In addition, 4 AC&W squadrons continued their roundthe-clock participation in the active air defense network. 

Two, at Salt Lake City, Utah, and Denver, Colorado, were 

in the zone of interior, and two continued to provide the 

sole radar air defenses in Hawaii. 

FIREPOWER EXERCISES 

The ANG demonstrated its capability to provide tactical 

air support by performing firepower exercises at various 

Army locations during the year. These exercises, showing 

the tactical air firepower available to ground forces, are 

a part of Army command school programs. In addition 

to the live ordnance training received by the ANG and 

the Army, TAC is able to observe and evaluate ANG 

tactical units in action. 

TACTICAL RECONNAISSANCE 

The Air Force has a continuing requirement for current 

photographic coverage of certain domestic urban areas 

and installations. This photography is utilized to produce 

area and installation analysis reports in the bomb damage 

assessment intelligence plan that would be utilized in the 
event of enemy attack. ANG tactical reconnaissance units, 

in conjunction with Ninth Air Force, provided the required 

photography and analysis reports for this project. These 

units also provided high priority photography for the Tactical Air Command throughout the year. 

WIDE AWAKE 

A requirement exists to periodically evaluate the tactical 

capability of the air defense system in the zone of interior. 

To provide a realistic means of evaluating commands other 

than ADC that have aircraft capable of simulating an 

enemy strike force (Faker aircraft) and run missions 

against strategic United States targets, ADC levied a requirement on the ANG to provide aircraft from tactical 

fighter and tactical reconnaissance squadrons. The requirement is for 42 aircraft and aircrews each month, for nine 

months, at an average of three days per month. 

For details on these joint exercises, see Appendix. 

Air Materiel 

SUPPLY 

The assignment of certain Air National Guard units 

under the Military Air Transport Service (MATS) as 

gaining command was a test of the supply "know how" of 

operating personnel. Close liaison with MATS kept redistribution of related equipment and supplies flowing 

smoothly. 

The conversion of certain fighter squadrons to more 

modern and complex aircraft proved the supply support 

systems to be adequate. Although there was no significant 

curtailment of flying due to equipment shortage, a limited 

number of jet engine field maintenance items and special 

testing equipment were in short supply. As of 30 June 

1960, these critical items were on procurement. 

UNIT MISSION EQUIPMENT ANG TACTICAL FLYING UNITS 

30 IUME 1959 <S 31 HIKE 19ft 

Tho Unit Moslon Eqoipaent •hmwd 

• docrtuo trcm 92* In FT 59 to 

88J In FT 60. TtUa dvcrsua v u 

attj-lbatad to tho eoHrwoion of & 

•l|tmll I t 

Overall, the ANG had on hand 88 percent of its training mission equipment at the close of the fiscal year. 

Although this was a drop of 4 percent from last year, it 

was considered good in light of the many aircraft conversions and mission changes. 

After better than a year of use, the IBM punch card 

machine has proven its worth in ANG supply activities. 

Not only has it greatly reduced the time factor for initiating 

requisitions but, being compatible with depot machine 

systems, it has also reduced the time needed to process 

materiel for depot support. In addition, these machines 

have been used in accounting, personnel, and maintenance 

activities. Complete base mechanization will be tested at 

one base commencing in the next fiscal year. If the mechanization system appears suitable it will be tested at one or 

more remote bases for positive determination of its applicability to the Air Guard. 

The program for equipping units with needed communications-electronics equipment progressed very adequately 

during the year. Realignment of authorizations consistent 

with revised requirements and resultant redistribution of 

equipment assets did much to facilitate the training processes. A considerable amount of communications-electronics equipment was added to the ANG inventory from 

active establishment resources and from surplus assets of 

the Government. 

Most ANG communications-electronics units benefited 

by receipt of either additional equipments or modernization of existing assets. Plans were initiated to further realign equipment authorizations and assets in keeping with 

the new communications-electronics force structure that 

becomes effective 1 October I960. 

Property audits and inspections continued to indicate 

58 
excellent supply management in the field. Project Count, 

the Air Force-wide fencc-to-fcnce inventory, was completed and an inventory accuracy of 97 percent was 

achieved by the Air Guard. 

Throughout the year, regional conferences were used 

to help forestall supply problems. These conferences were 

held jointly with maintenance personnel, the largest users 

of the supply system end product. 

AIRCRAFT INVENTORY 

At the end of FY 1960, the ANG aircraft inventory 

totaled 2,269 compared to 2,420 at the beginning of the 

year. Most of the reduction was in F-86D, F-86H, and 

F-89D models. A change in mission of 6 fighter squadrons to air transport squadrons equipped with C-97 

models was responsible primarily for the decrease in the 

jet inventory. During the year, numbers of Century series 

aircraft increased with assignment of F-102s and F-104s to 

the Air Guard. 

VEHICLES 

The trend toward improvement in vehicle inventory 

control continued at a rapid pace during FY 1960. This 

progress was due to aggressive interest on the part of 

organizations concerned and their better grasp of the 

intricacies of the vehicle supply and reporting system. 

Approximately $2,000,000 worth of vehicles were acquired during this period, including a high proportion of 

direct aircraft support vehicles (e.g., the MC-1 vacuum 

sweeper, MB-4 aircraft towing tractor and the AF/S32R-2 

aircraft fuel servicing tank trucks), in addition to general 

purpose vehicles which were urgently needed as replacements. 

The number of vehicles authorized remained consistent 

compared with the preceding year, while assets increased 

due to initial issue receipts and added emphasis on factual 

inventory reporting. As of 30 June 1960, the ANG vehicle 

inventory was approximately 8,000. 

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 

Depot level aircraft maintenance support during FY 

1960 was conducted within three categories. 

1. In Place Maintenance: Contract field teams traveled 

to units and worked on certain aircraft "in place." This 

new concept of depot level support resulted in • substantial savings. Aircraft affected were F-86s, C-45s, F/RF84Fs, F-89s and RB-57s. 

2. Depot Maintenance: Only one type aircraft—the 

SA-16—was flown to an Air Materiel Command depot 

for modification and or repair. 

3. Contractor Maintenance: Both T-33 and F-100A 

aircraft received modification and or repair at a contractor 

facility. 

The work in all categories included compliance with 

outstanding technical orders, required accessory replace-
ment and special inspections, corrosion control, gaining 

access to items or areas requiring treatment or replacement, and sheet metal and electrical work beyond the 

capability of individual units. 

A total of 1,694 aircraft received depot level maintenance under the three categories during fiscal year 1960. 

Armament and electronic modifications were made on 

a majority of aircraft, designed to update and increase their 

mission capability. For example, several F-100 squadrons 

were modified for the Sidewinder missile (GAR-8) while 

RB-57 aircraft were modified for installation of an instrument landing and omni-directional navigation system 

(ARN-14-18 or ARN-31). Non-availability of components for the tactical air navigation (ARN-21 ) modification impeded this program; however, the equipment was 

expected to become available within the first 9 months of 

FY 1961. 

Civil Er 

Accomplishment of the Air National Guard mission 

requires facilities for tactical flying units, training sites, and 

support facilities. On 30 June 1960, the ANG was utilizing 

93 flying fields and 41 non-flying installations located in 

each State, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. 

New ANG facilities are constructed only when existing 

suitable facilities are not available. The accompanying 

photos show two examples of ANG facilities. At Salt Lake 

City, Utah, the Air Guard uses a former USAF installation. At Kelly AFB, Texas, new facilities have been constructed according to standard plans developed by the 

National Guard Bureau and tailored to the mission and 

equipment of individual units. 

BUDGET AND REQUIREMENTS 

During FY 1960, continued emphasis was placed on 

improving the Unit Requirements List (URL) system. 

This system was designed for developing, collecting, and 

consolidating data to show authorized requirements, current inventory, and related information pertaining to ANG 

unit mission equipment as authorized by the Bureau. The 

URL System, as established by ANGR 67-83, requires 

the reporting of day-to-day changes by operating units 

using electrical accounting machine cards and provided the 

Bureau with up-to-date records of requirements and 

assets at all times. Improvement in the key-punching of 

the cards has resulted from the changing of the card 

format and establishing a new NGB Form 74. New procedures were introduced to enable reporting units to 

reduce the number of cards used, thereby lessening to some 

degree the work load in maintaining unit and Bureau card 

files. 
NEW CONSTRUCTION 

The FY 1960 construction program was based on the 

continued modification and expansion of the ANG base 

structure to keep pace with more modern jet aircraft and 

changing missions. Major projects accomplished included 

six runway installations plus two overruns and one barrier, 

five hangars, two AC&W buildings, two apron expansions, 

two engine buildup shops, one control tower, a general 

purpose shop, an automotive maintenance shop, and a 

paint, oil, and dope storage building. 

Real estate upon which ANG units are located is furnished either by the various States on a long term lease at 

nominal cost or by license on installations owned by the 

Federal government. 

ANG major construction is accomplished in cooperation with the Department of the Army's Corps of Engineers, and the Department of the Navy's Bureau of Yards 

and Docks. 

Federal funds are used for construction of ANG facilities as provided for in Chapter 133, Title 10, U.S. Code. 

The Congress annually authorizes projects on a line-item 

basis, and appropriates funds for them. Unlike funds 

appropriated for operations and maintenance and for personnel, which must be expended within the fiscal year. 

appropriations for construction projects may be carried 

over to succeeding years. Of the total amount of Federal 

appropriations for ANG construction remaining, authority 

was granted in Fiscal Year 1960 to proceed with projects 

representing an estimated total cost of $14,400,000, and 

construction action was initiated on projects representing 

an estimated total cost of $12,900,000. 

In addition to the actual construction, advance planning 

was authorized for $7,200,000 of anticipated construction 

for Fiscal Year 1961. Advance planning in the form of 

design and surveys has proven to be the most effective 

and efficient method of developing an orderly and sound 

construction program. Through such planning the considerations of lead time and use of available manpower 

receive more recognition, and better use is made of available labor and materials. 

MAJOR REPAIR AND MODIFICATION 

In FY I960, 442 major repair and modification projects 

were accomplished at existing facilities on 107 installations. The total cost was $2,882,482. The work included 

under this program was generated by conversions to more 

modern aircraft, along with more complex support equipment. Included also were requirements to make possible 

more efficient methods of operation and the need to 

modernize aging facilities. This program allows unit commanders to modify or alter existing facilities. 

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 

The maintenance of the facilities and the operation of 

utilities systems at ANG bases were accomplished by service contracts and agreements between the Federal Government and the various States, Puerto Rico and the District 

of Columbia. Under the terms of these contracts and 

agreements, the Federal Government defrayed 75 percent 

of the actual cost except for permanent field training sites 

where the entire funding was accomplished by the Federal 

Government. The total cost to the federal Government 

in FY 1960 for maintaining and operating ANG installations was $6,753,928. 

NAVIGATIONAL AIDS AND AIR 

TRAFFIC CONTROL 

At the beginning of the fiscal year, it appeared that the 

lack of adequate ground navigational aid environments 

would limit the operational training capability of some 

ANG flying units. By the end of the year, however, the 

situation had improved considerably due to activation of 

VORTAC (Tactical VHF Omni Range) or TACAN 

(Tactical Air Navigation) facilities at the majority of 

ANG bases. Slippage in the airborne modification program and conversion of six jet units to conventional type 

aircraft also reduced the urgency of the requirement for 

certain new ground navigational aids. In addition, the 

Federal Aviation Agency and the military establishments 

provided a number of other navigational aids such as 

surveillance radar, instrument landing systems, and ultra 

high frequency direction finding (UHF DF) radio sefs at 

ANG bases and have programmed additional facilities for 

the next year. The ANG also procured and installed 

TVOR (terminal very high frequency omni radio range) 

at Dobbins AFB, Georgia, and a fixed dual TACAN facility at the Permanent Training Site at Volk Field, Wisconsin. Both facilities will be commissioned early in Fiscal 

Year 1961. In addition, a UHF DF was installed at Volk 

Field. The ANG continued to operate control tower facilities at five ANG bases with air technicians. 
CONTROL TOWER STRUCTURES 

The USAF Ground Electronics Equipment Installation 

Agency (GEEIA) completed the installation of communications-electronics equipment components in control 

towers at Martinsburg, West Virginia, and Hutchinson, 

Kansas. A new control tower structure was placed under 

construction contract at Springfield. Ohio, bids were solicited for a new tower at the Phelps Collins Airport. Michigan, training site, and architects began the design of a new 

tower for Congarec Air Base, South Carolina. A TACAN 

building was completed at the Volk Field Permanent 

Training Site. 

PRESENT FACILITIES 

A. Flying Facilities 93 

Municipal Fields 71 

State 2 

Air Force Bases 13 

Private 2 

Navy Bases 5 

93* 

38 Joint Use (Navy. AF. Res.) 

B. Non-Flying Bases 

AC&W—Radio Relay—etc. 41 
APPENDIXES 

•••••••••••••••••••••••• • 

Appendix A 

CHIEF OF: 

DIVISION OF MILITIA AFFAIRS - - - - 1908-1916 

MILITIA BUREAU 1916-1933 

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 1933-

CoL Erasmus M. Weaver 1908-191 1 

Brig. Gen. Robert K. Evans 191 1-1912 

Maj. Gen. Albert L. Mills 1912-1916 

Maj. Gen. William A. Mann 1916-1917 

Maj. Gen. Jessie Mel. Carter 1917-1918 

Brig. Gen. John W. Heavey (Acting) 1918-1919 

Maj. Gen. Jessie Mel. Carter 1919-1921 

Maj. Gen. George C. Rickards 1921-1925 

Maj. Gen. Creed C. Hammond 1925-1929 

Col. Ernest R. Redmond (Acting) 1929-1929 

Maj. Gen. William G. Everson 1929-1931 

Maj. Gen. George E. Leach 1931-1935 

Col. Herold J. Weiler (Acting) 1935-1936 

Col. John 

Ma 

Ma 

Ma 

Ma 

Ma 

Ma 

Ma 

Ma 

Ma 

Ma 

Ma 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

F. Williams (Acting) 1936-1936 

Albert H. Blanding 1936-1940 

John F. Williams 1940-1944 

John F. Williams (Acting) 1944-1946 

Butler B. Miltonberger 1946-1947 

Kenneth F. Cramer 1947-1950 

Raymond H. Fleming (Acting) 1950-1951 

Raymond H. Fleming 1951-1953 

Earl T. Ricks (Acting) 1953-1953 

Edgar C. Erickson 1953-1959 

Winston P. Wilson (Acting) 1959-1959 

Donald W. McGowan 1959-

Appendix B 

STATE ADJUTANTS GENERAL 

Alabama 

Alaska 

Arizona 

Arkansas 

California 

Colorado 

Connecticut 

Delaware 

District of 

Columbia 

Florida 

Georgia 

Hawaii 

Idaho 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

Maine 

Maryland 

Maj. Gen. 

Brig. Gen 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

(Com. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

Maj. Gen. 

. Henry V. Graham 

. Thomas P. Carroll 

. John C. Wilson 

. Sherman T. dinge r 

. Earle M. Jones 

. Joe C. Moffitt 

Frederick G. Reincke 

Joseph J. Scannell 

William H. Abcndroth 

Gen.) 

Mark W. Lance 

George J. Hearn 

Fred W. Makinncy 

John E. Walsh 

Leo M. Boyle 

John W. McConncIl 

Fred C. Tandy 

Joe Nickell 

Arthur Y. Lloyd 

Raymond F. Hufft 

Edwin W. Heywood 

Milton A. Reckord 

30 June 1960 

Massachusetts 

Michigan 

Minnesota 

Mississippi 

Missouri 

Montana 

Nebraska 

Nevada 

New Hampshire 

New Jersey 

New Mexico 

New York 

North Carolina 

North Dakota 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

Oregon 

Pennsylvania 

Puerto Rico 

Rhode Island 

South Carolina 

South Dakota 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Ma 

Maj 

Maj 

Ma 

Ma 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Ma 

Ma 

Ma; 

Maj 

Ma 

Maj 

Brk 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gene 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

. Gen. 

William H. Harrison, Jr. 

Ronald D. McDonald 

Joseph E. Nelson 

William P. Wilson 

Albert D. Shcppard 

:ral. Spencer H. Mitchell 

Lyle A. Welch 

James A. May 

Francis B. McSwincy 

James F. Cantwell (C of S) 

John P. Jolly 

A. C. OHara, (CofS) 

Capus M. Waynick 

Heber L. Edwards 

Loren G. Windom 

Roy W. Kenny 

Alfred E. Hintz 

Anthony J. D. Biddle 

Juan Cesar Cordero 

Daniel S. T. Hinman 

Frank D. Pinckncy 

Homer E. Jensen 

(-5 
Tennessee 

Texas 

Utah 

Vermont 

Virginia 

Alabama 

Alaska 

Arizona 

Arkansas 

California 

Colorado 

Connecticut 

Delaware 

District of 

Columbia 

Florida 

Georgia 

Hawaii 

Idaho 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

Maine 

Maryland 

Massachusetts 

Michigan 

Minnesota 

Mississipp i 

Missouri 

Maj. Gen. George H. Butler 

Maj. Gen. Kearie L. Berry 

Maj. Gen. Maxwell E. Rich 

Maj. Gen. Francis W. Billado 

Maj. Gen. Paul M. Booth 

Washington 

West Virginia 

Wisconsin 

Wyoming 

Maj. Gen ' Haskett 

Maj. Gen. William E. Blake 

Maj Gen. Ralph J. Olson 

Maj. Gen. Rhodolph L Esmay 

Appendix C 

U.S. PROPERTY AND FISCAL OFFICERS 

30 June I960 

Col. Clinton L. Adams 

Col. Charles W. Casper 

Lt. Col. Michael E. Curry 

Capt. Clyde L. Price 

Lt. Col. Connie M. Hobbs 

Lt. Col. George J. Williams 

Col. Edward D. Walsh 

Col. John B. Grier 

Lt. Col. Fletcher F. Bernsdorff 

Col. Julian F. Pfaff 

Lt. Col. Charles S. Thompson. Jr. 

Col. Clark G. Johnson 

Col. Carl L. Isenberg 

Col. Gerald B. Lahey 

Col. Norwood R. Hughes 

Lt. Col. Russell E. Law 

Maj. Edwin J. Pease 

Maj. Willis R. Hodges 

Lt. Col. Joseph A. Holliday 

Col. Theodore E. Leu in 

Lt. Col. Irvin E. Ebaugh 

Col. John F. Kane 

Col. Jay 1. Nowlen 

Lt. Col. Dean K. Torney 

Col. Sherman B. Anderson 

Lt. Col. James J. Mayes 

Montana 

Nebraska 

Nevada 

New Hampshire 

New Jersey 

New Mexico 

New York 

North Carolina 

North Dakota 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

Oregon 

Pennsylvania 

Puerto Rico 

Rhode Island 

South Carolina 

South Dakota 

Tennessee 

Texas 

Utah 

Vermont 

Virginia 

Washington 

West Virginia 

Wisconsin 

Wyoming 

Maj. Harry W. Thode 

Harp. A Dahigren 

Maj. Earl A. Edmunds 

Lt. Col. Arthur F. Hanson 

Col. Frank E. Hanlon 

Lt. Col. Robert H. Moser 

Lt. Col. Kenneth L. Buscher 

Col. Thomas B. Longest 

Lt. Col. Leroy A Landom 

Col. Raymond Strasburger 

Col RossH Routh 

Lt. Col. W illiam H. Adams 

Lt. Col. Clair J. StoufTer 

Lt. Col. Tulio L. Diaz-Ramirez 

Lt. Col. John C. W all 

Col. Grover C. Cooper. Jr. 

Lt. Col. Carl J. Schieferstein 

Lt. Col. Mitchell A. Marshall 

Col. Howard R Clew is 

Lt. Col. Joe E. Whitesides 

Lt. Col. Frank S. Isham 

Lt. Col. Harold S. Price 

Lt. Col. Albert G. Hagen 

Col. Othal V. Knipp 

Col. Malvin P. W ang 

lenrj W. Lloyd 

Appendix D 

OFFICERS DETAILED TO DUTY IN 

THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 

30 June 1960 

McGowan, Donald W., Maj. Gen . ARNGUS. Chief. Ator. Llo\d G . Col . ARNGUS. Chief. Office of Policy 

NGB. and Liaison. 

Wilson. Winston P.. Maj. Gen.. USAF. Deput) Chief. Blackman, Robert D . Mai., USAF. Assistant Lea l 

NGB. . . . 

Terrill. Robert S.. Col.. USAF. Executive, NGB. " Us °

r 

Brown. John G. C , Lt. Col., USA. Assistant Executive. Connor. James R . Lt. Col.. ARNGUS. Chief. Office of 

NGB. Public Affairs (TDY at school). 

66 
Haygood, Herman R., Maj., USAF, Chief, Administrative 

Office. 

Scholin, Allan R., Lt. Col., USAF, Acting Chief, Office 

of Public Affairs. 

Office of the Assistant Chief, National Guard 

Bureau, for Army National Guard 

Kerr, Clayton P., Maj. Gen., ARNGUS, Assistant Chief. 

NGB, Army. 

Greenlief, Francis S., Col., ARNGUS, Executive. 

Piddington, Thomas C, Lt. Col., ARNGUS, Assistant 

Executive. 

Ahee, Joe, Col., Armor, USA, Chief, Organization and 

Training Division. 

Anderson, Allen O., Maj., Armor, USAR, Training 

Branch. Organization and Training Division. 

Badger, Ralph R., Lt. Col., Inf., ARNGUS, Chief, Planning, Program and Budget Branch, Installations 

Division. 

Beelman, Glenn T., Col., Inf., USA, Chief, Logistics 

Division. 

Boatwright, Charles C, Lt. Col., AGC, ARNGUS, Chief, 

Officer Branch, Personnel Division. 

Briggs, Richard F., Lt. Col., Armor, USA, Chief, Training Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Brockway, Ronald S., Lt. Col., CE, USAR, Deputy Chief, 

Installations Division. 

Campbell, John E., Lt. Col.. Arty., USA, Chief, Air 

Defense Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Dicks, Arthur E., Lt. Col., SC, ARNGUS, Chief, Supply 

and Accounting Branch, Logistics Division. 

Dunn, Thomas M., Jr., Capt., TC, USA, Maintenance and 

Services Branch, Logistics Division. 

French, Keith A., Lt. Col., Arty.. USAR, Chief. Army 

Aviation Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Holter, Howard H., Maj., MSC, ARNGUS, Supply and 

Accounting Branch, Logistics Division. 

Jacques, William R., Maj., Inf., ARNGUS, Chief, Organization, Mobilization, and Army Adviser Branch 

Organization and Training Division. 

Jctmore, Clinton N. Jr., Capt., FC USA, Chief, Finance 

and Accounting Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Kibler, George N., Col., CE, USA, Chief, Installations 

Division. 

McGuire, Elmer L., Maj., Ord., ARNGUS, Chief, Maintenance and Services, Logistics Division. 

Metcalfe, Charles G., Col., FC, USA, Chief, Comptroller 

Division. 

Morley, Harrison A., Maj., Armor, USA, Army Aviation 

Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Morse, Herbert E., Maj., Inf., USA, Organization, Mobilization, and Army Advisers Branch, Organization and 

Training Division. 

Novy, James F., Lt. Col., AGC, USA, Chief, Enlisted 

Branch, Personnel Division. 

Orlob, August L„ Maj., Arty., ARNGUS, Training 

Branch. Organization and Training Division. 

Persell, Robert A., Col., AGC, USA, Chief, Personnel 

Division. 

Ross, Fred L., Lt. Col., Arty., USA, Deputy Chief. Organization and Training Division. 

Roughsedge, Walter L., Lt. Col., QMC, ARNGUS, 

Deputy Chief, Logistics Division. 

Ruhe, Joseph G., Maj., MC, USA, Army Surgeon. 

Sibley, James E., Lt. Col., Inf., ARNGUS, Supply and 

Accounting Branch, Logistics Division. 

Sisson, Edward A., Jr., Maj., Arty., ARNGUS, Air Defense Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Walton, Charles F., Maj., AGC, USAR. Officers Branch. 

Personnel Division. 

Winfield, Floyd A., Maj., Arty., ARNGUS, Organization, 

Mobilization, and Army Advisers Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Wingatc, Clifton B., Lt. Col., Inf., ARNGUS, Chief, Army 

Technician Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Office of the Assistant Chief, National Guard 

Bureau, for Air 

Wilson, Winston P., Maj. Gen., USAF, Assistant Chief, 

National Guard Bureau, for Air. 

Lichty, Benjamin W., Col., USAF, Executive. 

Crider, Edward O., Maj., USAF, Assistant Executive. 

Aubrey, Carl L., Col., USAF, Chief, Operations Branch, 

Operations and Training Division. 

Autrey, Marius M., Maj., USAF, Operations Branch. 

Operations and Training Division. 

Battison, William J., Col., USAF, Chief, Civil Engineering 

Division. 

Bell, Buron G., Maj., USAF, Operations Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Carigan, William E., Jr., Maj., USAF, Supply Branch, 

Materiel Division. 

Clayton, Benjamin H., Maj., USAF, Operations Branch. 

Operations and Training Division. 

Cooper, Peter G., Maj., USAF, Supply Branch, Materiel 

Division. 

Davis, Silas E., Jr., Capt., USAF, Training Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Deneke, William L., Maj., USAF, Chief, Maintenance and 

Operations Branch, Civil Engineering Division. 

Everett, Patrick C, Maj., USAF, Training Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Faris, Thomas B„ Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Military Personnel Branch, Personnel Division. 

Goodc, John W., Capt., USAF, Programs and Manpower 

Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Goodnight, Elmer K., Maj., USAF, Accounting and 

bl 
Finance Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Greene, Harold C, Ma]., USAF, CommunicationsElectronics and Weather Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Hanley, Lloyd G., Col., USAF, Chief, Materiel Division. 

Higgins, Raymond J., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Personnel 

Division. 

Hogg, Roy B., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Management and 

Analysis Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Hook, Fred G., Col., USAF, Chief, Operations and Training Division. 

Hornung, Ernest L., Maj., USAF, Maintenance Branch, 

Materiel Division. 

Hughes, Arthur G., Jr., Maj., USAF, Rated Personnel and 

Special Activities Branch, Personnel Division. 

Hunter, James E., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Training 

Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Konin, David H., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Communications-Electronics and Weather Branch, Operations 

and Training Division. 

Lakin, Robert K., Maj., USAF, Chief, Programs and 

Real Property Branch, Civil Engineering Division. 

Loveland, Albert C, Maj., USAF, Maintenance Branch, 

Materiel Division. 

McQueen, Max B., Col., USAF, Air Surgeon. 

Malnassy, Ernest, Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Supply Branch, 

Materiel Division. 

Meis, Joe F., Col., USAF, Comptroller Division. 

Metcalf, Curtis N., Lt. Col., USAF, Training Branch, 

Operations and Training Division. 

Miller, Glenn A., Capt., USAF, Operations Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Oberschmid, Robert E., Maj., USAF, Maintenance 

Branch, Materiel Division. 

O'Donnell, Robert A., Maj., USAF, Chief, Budget Branch, 

Comptroller Division. 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

NATIONAL GUARD ASSOCIATION TROPHY, 

PERSHING TROPHY AND NATIONAL GUARD 

(STATE) TROPHY. This competition is based on the 

highest figure of merit attained by Army National Guard 

units in accomplishing prescribed qualification firing of 

assigned individual weapons. The National Guard Association Trophy is awarded annually to the unit attaining 

the highest figure of merit of all competing teams; the 

Pershing Trophy is awarded annually to the unit attaining 

the highest figure of merit in each Army Area; and the 

National Guard (State) Trophy is awarded annually to the 

unit attaining the highest figure of merit in each State. In 

Paulk, James W., Jr., Maj., USAF, Chief, Budget and 

Requirements Branch, Materiel Division. 

Pizzo, Philip J., Maj., USAF, Engineering Branch, Civil 

Engineering Division. 

Ries, Raymond P., Capt., USAF, Military Personnel 

Branch, Personnel Division. 

Ringley, Howard D., Maj., USAF, CommunicationsElectronics and Weather Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Robb, Stewart W., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Maintenance 

Branch, Materiel Division. 

Rowland, Clifton A., Maj., USAF, Accounting and 

Finance Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Seabolt, Robert H., Capt., USAF, Programs and Manpower Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Sims, Ardath M., Maj., USAF, Maintenance Branch, 

Materiel Division. 

Streidl, Edward O, Lt. Col., USAF, Office of the Air 

Surgeon. 

Sussky, Ira M., Lt. Col., USAF, Training Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Swanson, Harold A., Maj., USAF, Operations Branch, 

Operations and Training Division. 

Taylor, Irving E., Jr., Capt., USAF, Accounting and 

Finance Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Walters, Joseph C, Lt. Col., USAF, Deputy Chief, Civil 

Engineering Division. 

Watts, David H., CWO, USAF, Military Personnel 

Branch, Personnel Division. 

White, George G., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Programs and 

Manpower Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Wibom, Francis C, Lt. Co!., USAF, Chief, Accounting 

and Finance Branch. 

1959, units from 28 states entered this competition. The 

National winner was Company D, 1st Battle Group, 156th 

Infantry, Louisiana Army National Guard. Complete list 

of winners was published in NGB PAM 44-2. 

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION TROPHY. This 

trophy is awarded annually to the team representing an 

Army National Guard unit which attains the highest score 

in all the States in .22 caliber rifle "postal matches." The 

underlying purpose of this competition is to encourage the 

Appendix E 

68 
formation of competitive matches between leagues formed 

in each State with the winning team in each league being 

eligible to shoot for the National Rifle Association Trophy. 

In 1960, this trophy was won by the 613th Ordnance 

Company (DS), Hawaii Army National Guard. Complete 

list of winners was published in NGB PAM 44-3. 

THE CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD 

BUREAU'S TROPHIES. This competition consists of 

three indoor rifle matches conducted by the National Rifle 

Association for the National Guard Bureau, utilizing .22 

caliber weapons. The matches consist of a unit team 

match, a battalion or equivalent team match, and an individual match. In 1960, 200 units entered teams in the 

Unit Team Match, 56 teams entered the Battalion Team 

Match, and 273 entries were received for the Individual 

Match. Respective winners of these matches were Headquarters and Headquarters Company, Combat Command 

B, 48th Armored Division, Georgia ARNG; Special 

Troops Battalion, Hawaii ARNG; and Sfc Joseph C. 

Roark, 665th Ordnance Company (GS), South Dakota 

ARNG. Complete list of winners was published in NGB 

PAM 44-4. 

MILITARY POLICE TEAM PISTOL TROPHY. 

This competition consists of a caliber .45 pistol match, 

sponsored by the Military Police Association. Entries are 

restricted to Military Police units of the Army National 

Guard. The trophy is permanently displayed in the Military Police Corps Museum at Fort Gordon, Georgia, and 

a replica is furnished the winning team for permanent 

retention. The winning team in 1959 was the 120th Military Police Company, Hawaii Army National Guard. Complete list of winners was published in NGB PAM 44-5. 

THE EISENHOWER TROPHY. This trophy was presented to 50 units in 1959. Named in honor of General 

of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower, it is awarded each 

calendar year to an outstanding company-size unit of the 

Army National Guard in each State. Complete list of 

winners was published in NGB PAM 44-6. 

UNITED STATES ARMY AIR DEFENSE COMMANDERS TROPHY. The Army Air Defense Commander's Trophy is awarded each December to the most 

outstanding Army National Guard on-site missile battalion. 

In fiscal year 1960, 1st Missile Battalion, 202d Artillery, 

Illinois Army National Guard, was the winner of the second annual trophy over elements of 32 eligible combat 

ready Army National Guard battalions in 14 States. The 

trophy is a cup which is replaced by permanent plaques for 

each firing battery as the cup is passed on to subsequent 

winners. The winner is determined on the basis of ratings 

achieved by the various battalions in operational readiness 

inspections, command maintenance inspections, annual 

service practice scores, and the Annual General Inspections. 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

EARL T. RICKS MEMORIAL TROPHY. Named for 

Major General Earl T. Ricks, former Deputy Chief of the 

National Guard Bureau and Chief of the Air Force Division, this trophy is awarded to Air National Guard pilots 

in competition which emphasizes flight planning, high 

speed cruise control, and tactical proficiency. The trophy 

is a large silver replica of the Washington Monument, surmounted by a bronze jet airplane and mounted on a silver 

base. The winner of the event held on 2 September 1959 

was selected from a field of 10 pilots competing in the 

850 mile course from Memphis, Tennessee to Miami, 

Florida. He was Captain Donald K. Reid, 171 Tactical 

Reconnaissance Squadron, Michigan Air National Guard. 

NATIONAL GUARD ASSOCIATION TROPHY 

(AIR). This trophy, presented for the first time in fiscal 

year 1960, will be awarded each year to the Air National 

Guard units judged most operationally ready in each major 

aircraft grouping. The criteria used are aircrew readiness, 

readiness of other than aircrew personnel, operational 

readiness of aircraft, accident rates and flying safety programs. The winning units for fiscal year 1960, by type 

aircraft groupings were: 

199 Fighter Interceptor Sq., Hawaii (F86 D/L) 

114 Fighter Group, South Dakota (F89) 

104 Tactical Fighter Group, Massachusetts (F86H) 

108 Tactical Fighter Wing, New Jersey (84F) 

*160 Tac Recon Sq, Alabama (RF84F) 

* 153 Tac Recon Sq, Mississippi (RF84F) 

*184 Tac Recon Sq, Arkansas (RF84F) 

130 Troop Car Sq (Tac Support), West Virginia (SA 

16) 

*Tied 

SPAATZ TROPHY. This trophy, named for General 

Carl Spaatz, former Chief of Staff of the United States Air 

Force, is awarded each year to the most outstanding Air 

National Guard tactical flying unit and remains in the 

permanent possession of the winning unit. Units are 

69 
judged on the basis of their tactical, technical, administative and logistical efficiency. The trophy is a large silver 

globe, surmounted by a modernistic aircraft and mounted 

on a silver base. If two Air National Guard units are tied 

for first place with a perfect score of 1000 points, each 

wins the trophy. A second highest scoring unit receives an 

engraved silver and mahogany plaque. An engraved bronze 

plaque is awarded to the third place winner. 

First place winners: 

141 Tactical Fighter Sq., New Jersey 

163 Tactical Fighter Sq., Indiana 

Second place winner: 

195 Tactical Fighter Sq., California 

Third place winner: 

153 Tac Recon Sq., Mississippi 

WINSTON P. WILSON TROPHY. This trophy, a 

ADMINISTRATION 

NGR 2-2 (Military Publications) was revised completely 

to prescribe publication policies related to unit libraries. 

These policies concern development and maintenance of 

publications stockrooms, an alphabetical distribution formula, bulk requirements of publications and blank forms 

for units alerted for active military service, supply of 

publications to State officer candidate schools and to newly 

activated, reorganized, or redesignated TOE units, and 

instructions for preparation and submission of DA Form 

12 (Requisition for Initial Distribution of Publications 

and Elank Forms). 

NGB PAM 2-1-1 (Publications—National Guard 

Bureau) lists current NGB publications, provides an alphabetical index of subjects covered by NGRs and NGB 

Pamphlets, and lists all regulations and pamphlets rescinded or superseded in the past year. 

NGB PAM 16-1 (United States Property and Fiscal 

Officer—Duties and Responsibilities) outlines general 

responsibilities of the USPFO for each State, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and District of Columbia. 

NGR 57 (Reports—Morning Report) was changed to 

eliminate requirements for assignment of unit code 

numbers to State OCS units or any branches thereof; 

eliminate the statement by authenticating officers regarding persons enlisted or reenlisted; reduce the exceslarge silver urn surmounted by an American eagle, is 

engraved with the inscription: "The Winston P. Wilson 

Trophy awarded for year-round Excellence in the Performance of the Air National Guard All-Weather Defense 

Mission." In addition there is engraved the insignia of 

the National Guard Bureau and the donors, i.e., Lockheed 

Aircraft Corporation; North American Aviation Company; and Northrop Aircraft Corporation. The winner for 

fiscal year 1960 was the 133 Fighter Group (AD), Minnesota Air National Guard. 

AIR FORCE ASSOCIATION OUTSTANDING AIRMAN AWARD. The award, an engraved bronze plaque, 

is presented each year to the most outstanding Air National Guard airman, and remains in his permanent possession. The winner for fiscal year 1960 was Staff Sergeant 

Clarence E. Cunningham, a flight engineer of the 130th 

Troop Carrier Squadron, Charleston, West Virginia. 

sive use of DA Form 1 or copies thereof, by providing 

for substantiating performance of equivalent training by 

certificate and furnishing the Army Advisor a copy of DA 

Form 1 in lieu of a No. 1 copy of the form; reduce the 

"time factor" involved in manual processing of monthly 

morning reports by prescribing inclusion of aggregate 

total strength in "Strength Section"; prescribe additional 

sample remarks for accounting for ARNG personnel who 

enter and return from six months active duty for training 

and their accountability during such training; and provide 

that all copies of morning reports for the Chief, NGB, be 

forwarded to the State adjutant general for transmission 

to the Bureau in bulk. 

NGR 83 (Mail—Official Mail) was revised to implement provisions of AR 341-106 for the ARNG, permitting activities of the federally recognized ARNG to use 

official mail marking procedures adopted by Department 

of the Army. 

PERSONNEL 

NGR 10 (Personnel Identification (Identification Cards)) 

was revised to modify provisions of AR 606-5 for the 

ARNG and prescribe procedures for issue of DD Form 

2A (Res) (red) Identification Card to members of the 

ARNG not on active duty and provide a means of identification for qualified dependents of such members entitled 

to certain privileges. 

Appendix F 

Revisions, changes and new regulations published 

during FY 1960: 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

70 
NGR 26 (Reserve and Service Obligations—Deferments and Exemptions Screening) was changed to prescribe that enlisted personnel with a reserve obligation 

may be assigned to the inactive ARNG for a period not 

to exceed six months, or for the unexpired term of current 

enlistment, whichever is sooner; that individuals who 

enlisted prior to age 18'/2 years and who fail to participate 

satisfactorily will be reported to local boards for priority 

induction; and to rescind the requirement for the annual 

submission of DD Form 44 (Military Status of Individual). 

NGB PAM 51-1 (Technicians—Manning and Grade 

Criteria for Maintenance Technicians) provides a single 

document of instruction for computing required ARNG 

maintenance technician spaces. 

NGR 52 (Technicians—Payment and Accounting Procedures) was changed to provide procedures for payment 

of differential pay to technicians who attend service 

schools in their military status as now prescribed by NGR 

51. 

NGR 62 (Medical Service) was changed to provide that 

personnel on the Temporary Disability Retirement List 

be transferred to the Army Reserve when laws of the 

State prohibit their retention in the inactive ARNG 

beyond expiration of their term of service; bring all references to ARs and DA Forms up to date; permit USPFOs 

to settle vouchers for civilian medical care up to $500; 

make ARNG requirements for immunizations the same 

for active forces; and provide current instructions pertaining to initiation of new immunization forms. 

Commissioned Officers 

NGR 20-2 (Federal Recognition) was revised completely to effect the following major changes: (1) eliminate qualification for Federal recognition in the grade of 

second lieutenant by completion of the Army PreCommission Extension Course and accrual of two years 

creditable service to include six months active duty or 

active duty for training, or in lieu of active service completion of a leadership or NCO course; (2) limit the 

crediting of prior service toward extending maximum age 

for Federal recognition to prior service in the same or 

higher grade that has been accrued in a component of 

the U. S. Army only; (3) include evidence of a favorable 

National Agency Check prior to being boarded for a 

certificate of eligibility; (4) require specific documents to 

establish constructive credit entitlement as allied papers 

to support application for Federal recognition of medical 

and dental officers, and applicants for the Army Nurse 

Corps and Army Medical Specialist Corps; (5) incorporate requirement for draft age applicants to execute a 

statement of understanding; (6) include procedures for 

retirement of technical waivers; and (7) establish specific 

qualifications for Federal recognition of State adjutants 

general. 

NGR 20-3 (Promotion) was changed to specify that 

State adjutants general who are candidates for Federal 

recognition must have been duly appointed to the position 

of State adjutant general in a grade as prescribed by laws 

and regulations of the State, not to exceed major general. 

NGR 20-5 (Appointment and Requirements for Federal 

Recognition of Army National Guard Officers Assigned to 

Selective Service Section, State Headquarters and Headquarters Detachments) was revised to provide that Selective Service Officers must complete Special Subcourse A 

(Emergency Telecommunications) as a professional requirement, and that officers initially assigned to the 

Selective Service Section in grades above second lieutenant 

may be given a technical waiver in the same manner as 

provided for other officers changing branch. 

Enlisted 

NGR 25-1 (Enlistment and Reenlistment) was changed 

to permit dual membership in ARNG and ROTC of 

members of the Senior Division, Army ROTC, provided 

the number of such individuals does not exceed 5 percent 

of unit authorized maximum strength and is within the 

State quota announced annually by the Chief, NGB. 

NGR 25-3 (Discharge and Separation) was revised 

mainly to consolidate several changes in the existing regulation, and to provide authority to concurrently discharge 

personnel from both ARNG and Army Reserve due to 

hardship; detailed procedures for various types of discharge; procedures relative to NGB Form 22; for utilization of the Army Discharge Review Board for appeals 

regarding the class of discharge awarded; and that members of the Senior Division, ROTC, in both basic and 

advanced course, who fail to attend drill and who are not 

authorized constructive attendance, will be discharged 

from the Army National Guard and reverted to USAR 

control. 

ORGANIZATION 

NGR 15 (Organization) was changed to clarify strength 

authorizations resulting from ARNG reorganization. 

NGB PAM 15-1 (Army National Guard—Units Allotted to the States) shows type and location of ARNG 

units allotted to each State. 

TRAINING 

NGR 44 (Trophies and Awards) was revised primarily 

to bring provisions of this regulation into line with current 

organization, and authorized equipment and training requirements, and to add three new awards: NGA All 

National Guard Rifle Team and All National Guard Pistol 

71 
Team awards and the U. S. Army Air Defense Commanders Trophy. 

NGB PAM 45-4 describes administrative procedures for 

conduct of annual field training for ARNG units. 

NGB PAM 45-5 (Schedule of Classes for ARNG Personnel) announces class schedules for courses of instruction conducted at Army Service Schools which arc 

appropriate for ARNG personnel. 

NGR 48 (Inspections) was changed to clarify and 

reduce the number of required command inspections; and 

to prescribe use of USCONARC Form 914 (Training 

Evaluation Report, Reserve Components of the Army) in 

lieu of NGB Form 115. 

NGR 95-1 (Army Aviation—Selection and Processing 

for Warrant Officer Flight Training) Implements provisions 

of AR 135-20 (RESERVE COMPONENTS—Selection 

of Volunteers for Training as Rotary Wing Aviators) for 

the ARNG. It prescribes procedures for selection of 

ARNG personnel, not on active duty, to attend the Warrant Officer Rotary Wing Aviator Course and, upon 

successful completion, for appointment and Federal recognition of enlisted personnel as warrant officers. 

NGR 95-2 (Operations—Ferrying Army National 

Guard Aircraft) Prescribes procedures to be used for 

ordering ARNG aviators to active duty for training in 

Federal status for the purpose of ferrying aircraft. 

LOGISTICS 

NGR 70 (Transportation—Troops, Materiel, and Supplies) was revised to prescribe ARs applicable to ARNG 

transportation. 

NGR 75-2 (Federal Property—Supply and Accounting 

Procedures) was revised to provide a basic regulation 

prescribing policies for supply and accounting of Federal 

property. Major changes include: (1) a revised NGB 

Form 30 which simplifies and improves the ARNG 

property accounting system so that operation of the office 

of the USPFO will now more closely parallel similar operations of the active Army, mobilization clearance for 

Army National Guard units will be simplified, units will 

conduct self-inventories, the USPFO will not be required 

to "ship" property to units on formal documentation upon 

mobilization, and administrative workload at unit level is 

reduced; (2) requirement for an informal record on 

reportable items in each State showing the quantity in 

current distribution; (3) deletion of requirements for 

serial number files in the offices of the USPFO; (4) a 

change in designation of "unit jacket file" to "Field 

Auditor Control File;" (5) deletion of the requirement to 

transfer accountability for property on Memorandum 

Receipt when USPFOs are changed; (6) changes in the 

period of absence of unit responsible officer from four 

months to three months for the purpose of authorizing 

waiver on formal transfer of responsibility, and in requirements for inventories and hand receipts; and (7) provision 

for sub-property accounts in shops, to insure proper 

control of recoverable items issued and dropped from 

accountable records. 

NGB PAM 75-2-1 (Office of the USPFO) contains 

detailed accounting procedures for that office. 

NGB PAM 75-2-3 (Units and Activities) contains detailed accounting procedures for ARNG units. 

NGR 75-5 (Federal Property—Financial Inventory 

Accounting) was revised to reflect dropping "In Use" 

inventory from basic records and reporting forms used in 

ARNG Financial Inventory Accounting System. 

NGB PAM 75-5-1 (Financial Inventory Accounting 

Procedures) prescribes uniform accounting procedures and 

records required for accumulation of financial data for 

supply management reports and statement of inventory 

transactions. 

NGB PAM 75-9-1 (Record of Engineer Equipment 

Requiring Repair Parts Support) provides instructions and 

procedures for reporting requirements for repair parts 

support on Engineer equipment. 

NGB PAM 76-2 (Controlled Cannibalization of Equipment) prescribes procedures to establish controlled cannibalization points as a source of supply for low mortality 

repair parts. 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

ADMINISTRATION 

A NCR 174-1 (Reports Control—ANG Reports Control Systems) provides an administrative means of control 

over the number of reports an ANG unit must submit to 

higher headquarters. New reports must be approved by 

NGB and assigned a control symbol. Certain reports, 

including vouchers, weather reports, and Inspector General reports are exempt. 

FINANCE 

A NGR 173-01 (Finance—ANG Civilian Personnel) 

covers travel allowance for civilian personnel (air technicians), and prescribes procedures for submitting claims 

covering pay and allowances due deceased air technicians. 

PERSONNEL 

ANGR 31-01 (Preparation, Maintenance and Disposition of Certain Military Personnel Records) furnishes 

supplementary instructions to AFMs 35-9 and 35-12 on 

the requirement for and management of military personnel 

records of ANG officers and airmen. 

ANGR 35-02 (Selective Assignment of Qualified Reservist) Published in consonance with revision of AFR 

45-30, which it modifies for ANG use. No change in 

policy was effected. 

72 
ANGR 35-03B (Screening of ANG Personnel) modifies 

the basic regulation which provides for screening and 

annual records review. It implements DoD Directive 

1200.12 providing for identification and disposition of key 

Federal employees who would not be available for active 

Federal service in event of mobilization. 

A NCR 35-05A (Personnel Strength Program) amends 

the basic regulation on the personnel strength program by 

deleting all references to CONAC, in line with the new 

Reserve Forces Management Plan; clarifies certain aspects 

of basic regulation in determining required maintenance 

strength for augmented units, and Federal recognition 

status of airmen who enlist in non-federally recognized 

units. 

ANGR 36-011 (Classification of Officers) modifies 

AFM 36-1 for ANG use in officer classification, but effects 

no major change in classification policies. 

ANGR 36-012 (Federal Recognition of Warrant Officer 

Appointments) was revised to restrict acceptance of warrant officers to those already appointed as Reserve warrant 

officers of the Air Force, in keeping with the Air Force 

decision to phase out the warrant officer program. 

ANGR 36-013A (Federal Recognition in ANG and 

Promotion as a Reserve Warrant Officer of the Air Force) 

amends the basic regulation to preclude permanent Reserve promotion as a warrant officer based on temporary 

promotion received on active duty; deletes the requirement 

for holding a Federal Recognition Board for warrant 

officer promotions, since they are in all instances selected 

by a central board in the same manner as commissioned 

officers who are mandatorily promoted. 

ANGR 36-10 (Training Performance and Training 

Report) changes dates of submission for annual training 

performance reports to 31 August for lieutenants and 

warrant officers, 30 September for majors and captains, 

and 31 October for colonels and lieutenant colonels; provides more specific instructions for preparing training 

performance reports and includes philosophy behind 

effectiveness reporting and evaluation. 

ANGR 39-9A (Enlistment and Reenlistment in the 

ANG and as a Reserve of the Air Force) deletes the requirement for obtaining waivers in cases of minor traffic 

violations before enlistment or reenlistment can be accomplished; specifies that reenlistment for a 1 year period must 

be accomplished on the date following discharge, and 

tightens dependency restrictions for airmen of the lower 

grades; brings references within the basic regulation up to 

date; and provides format for availability certificate which 

must be obtained by Federal employees. 

ANGR 39-10 (Enlisted Personnel—Discharge) was 

revised to reflect the standardized discharge criteria published in DoD Directive 1332.14, 14 January 1959. 

Separate reasons for discharge were reduced in number, 

with many being placed under the general heading of 

"Convenience of the Government." 

ANGR 39-29 (Enlisted Personnel—Promotion and 

Demotion of Airmen) standardizes minimum eligibility requirements for promotion of airmen; establishes time-ingrade requirements as well as total years service requirement for progression to certain grades, and provides for 

accelerated promotion of especially qualified noncommissioned officers, not to exceed one-half of one percent of 

total assigned airman strength within any fiscal year. 

ORGANIZATION 

ANGR 23-01 (Organization—State Headquarters) was 

revised to change the manning guide attachment for 

Headquarters, State ANG. 

OPERATIONS AND TRAINING 

ANGR 55-6 (Operations—ANG Operational Readiness 

Reports) was revised to include a series of changes previously published, and to establish a new quarterly report 

on IBM cards by the highest military organization on a'hy 

one base as a means of reviewing over-all base readiness. 

ANGR 50-02A (Training—Unit Training Assemblies) 

changes rate of subsistence authorized at unit training 

assemblies and prescribes additional conditions in which 

subsistence is authorized. 

ANGR 52-2 (Training—On-lhe-Job Training) makes 

applicable AFR 52-2 pertaining to on-the-job training; 

and includes special ANG policies relating to participation 

in OJT. 

ANGR 123-1 (Inspection) modifies AFR 123-1, relating to the inspection system, and makes it applicable to 

ANG units. 

MATERIEL 

ANGR 66-04 (Maintenance Engineering—Technical 

Order Compliance Reporting for Propulsion Units) establishes ground rules and reporting procedures for accomplishing technical order compliance on aircraft propulsion 

units. 

ANGL 66-12 (Maintenance Engineering—Vehicle 

Management and Maintenance) implements AFM 66-12 

for ANG with modifications. 

ANGR 67-44 (Supply—Project Night Life (WRM)) 

provides for prestocking of Project AF-GEN-1-50 OPR 

Equipment and Supplies (WRM) at ANG Bases. 

ANGR 67-83 (Supply—Unit Requirements List) establishes a system for developing, collecting, and consolidating 

data to show authorized requirements, current inventory, 

and related information pertaining to authorized ANG 

unit equipment. 

ANGR 77-03 (Motor Vehicles—Vehicle Requirements, 

Redistribution and Disposition) provides policies and procedures regarding supply, disposition, and redistribution 

of vehicles. 

ANGR 77-1 (Motor Vehicles—Inventory Control and 

Reporting) establishes a uniform procedure for inventory 

control and reporting of vehicles. 

73 
Appendix G 

Special Projects FY i960 

WIDE AWAKE AND EYE OPENER 

FOR ADC 

November 

November 

1959 

1959 

9 December 1959 

16-17 January 1960 

11-13 March 1960 

29 April-1 May 1960 

4—RB-57 

12—F-84 

12—RF-84 

8—RB-57 

6—F-86H 

6—F-84F 

6—RF-84F 

18—T-33 

4—RB-57 

8—F-86H 

12—T-33 

8—RB-57 

12—RB-57 

15—T-33 

SPECIAL MISSIONS FOR TAC 

Firepower Demonstrations at Army Schools using 16 to 20 

F-84Fs and required support: 

17 October 1959 Fort Sill 

30 January 1960 Fort Sill 

4 February 1960 Fort Knox 

11 February 1960 Fort Lewis 

8 April 1960 Fort Bragg 

7 May 1960 Fort Sill 

Minute Man 1959—simulating 

RF-84Fs 11-18 July 1959 

122dTFW (Indiana) 

131st TFW (Missouri) 

121st TFW (Ohio) 

113th TFW (Massachusetts) 

107th TFW (New York) 

122d TFW (Indiana) 

BDA mission deploying 22 

SPECIAL MISSIONS FOR 

HEADQUARTERS USAF 

1. ANG placed second in the world-wide USAF gunnery meet 

at Tyndall AFB Fla., October 1959. 

2. ANG provided 200 aircraft days for photo coverage for TAC 

in support of USAF Photo Almanac using RF-84Fs and RB-57s. 

FLIGHTS AT REQUEST OF 

TAC FOR US ARMY 

Quick Switch (Special Forces US Army) 

14-21 November 1959 6—SA-16 

Air Exfiltration (US Army Special Warfare) 

21-22 September 1959 4—SA-16 

Little Bear (Photo flights in support of USARAL 

cold-weather exercise) 

10-24 February 1960 6—RB-57 

SPECIAL PROJECTS AT 

REQUEST OF CONAC 

Photo coverage of troop carrier drop zones. Approximately 60 

nights on an as-required basis 27 October 1959 through 30 June 

1960. 

Appendix H 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD FORCE STRUCTURE 

FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED UNITS 

30 JUNE 1960 

FIGHTER INTERCEPTOR 

AIR DEFENSE 

U W,n,» 

30 Group* 

40 Squadron* 

COMBAT FLYING ORGANIZATION 

TACTICAL FIGHTER 

T Wing* 

5 Groups 

22 Squldro u 

TACTICAL. RECON 

4 Wing. 

1 Group 

14 Squadron* 

TROOP CARRIER 

4 SquidrOn* 

4 Air Baa* Squadron* 

AIR TRANSPORT (HEAVY) 

2 Win*;. 

4 Group* 

b Squadron* 

NON TACTICAL. FLTTNG ORGANIZATIONS 

AEROMEDICAL 

1 Group 

•> Trantpor t Squadron* 

1 Ait Bat * Squadron (Aaroroad) 

1 USAT Di*p (Atroaud) 

AIR TRANSPORT 

(ftedlua) 

I Squadron 

GROUND SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS 

COMMUNICATIONS 

3 Conun 

16 Coiwa . 

U GEEIA 

Gp. Hq. 

Sqd*. 

5 Radio Relay Sqd*. 

1 Com m Sq (Spacl 

TAC. 

3 Ti t 

3 Ta x 

CON 

Con. 

Con. 

V 

C p . 

Sqd 

21 ACltW Unit* 

ACfcW 

2 Squadron* 

9 night * 

WEATHER 

)0 Flight* 
Appendix I 

HTHOUS 

GEN 

^-.05 

ANG OFFICER GRADE DISTRIBUTION 

AUTHORIZED VS ASSIGNED 

30 JUNE I960 

J 

COL 

ASSIGNED 

i 

mi 

_BI LT COL MAJ CAPT 

1 

1 

4.0 

LT E 

ANG OFFICERS-AGE 

(1 

AVERAGE AGE 

50 40 30 20 10 

T^^Z 

AND YE< 

0 JUNE I96C 

GEN 

COL 

LT COL 

MAJ 

CAPT 

1ST LT 

2ND LT 

W/0 

RS OF SERVICE ) 

AVERAGE TEARS OF SERVICE 

5 10 IS 20 H 

I 

ANG AIRMEN GRADE DISTRIBUTION 

SO JUNE I960 

CM/SOT SM/SOT M/SST T/S6T S/SGT A/1C A/2C A/JC A/B 

ANG AIRMEN-AGE AND YEARS OF SERVICE 

(30 JUNE I960) 

AVERAGE AGE AVERAGE TEARS OF SERVICE 

SM/SGT 

M/SGT 

T/SGT 

S/SGT 

A/1C 

A/2C 

A/3C 

A/B 

HHHHHH H 

• 

• 

AIRMEN LOSSES-F Y I96 0 

LOSSES TO LOSSES BY GRAPE 

REG COMP 

RES COMP 

OTHER THAN 

AIR FORCE 

4 4 % 

ACCEPT COMMISSION 

75 
ANG PERSONNEL ON FLYING STATUS 

BY AVERAGE YEARS SERVICE 

wnr „ . 30 JUNE I960 

OFFICERS AIRMEN 

" 20 '5 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 2S 

SEN 

COL 

LTCOL 

MAJ 

CAPT 

1ST LT 

2ND LT 

SM/SGT 

M/SGT 

T/SGT 

S/SGT 

A/1C 

A/2C 

A/3C 

A/B 

— 

• H 

1 

1 

GRADE DISTRIBUTION OF ANG PILOTS BY TYPE 

30 JUNE I960 

GEN COL LTCOt. MAJ CAPT 1ST LT 2NDLT 

76 
Axaj nationa l Guard, I960 

M M 

Apportioned tg Statea — Tota l 

1 . Alabama 

2 . Alaska 

3 Ariiona 

» . >rt.n» l 

5. Californi a 

8 . Delaware 

9 . Ettatrlct of ColuabU 

1 1 . Oaorsla 

1 2 . Hawaii 

1 }. Idaho 

15. Indiana 

1 6. Iova 

1 7 . Xanaaa 

19 totltlana 

?o. m m 

2 1 . drylan d 

2 2 . Maatachuaett. 

l b , Minneaota 

25. Hiit'.mp) : 

2 6 . Hleeourl 

2 6 . Nebraake 

2 9 . Davaria 

3 0 . Ne<i ilanpshire 

3 1 . KitoH l 

J2. MM N 

33- Sav York 

Ja, north Carollr a 

35. north Dakota 

36. Ohio 

37. Oklahoma 

38. Oregon 

39- Tannaylfam . 

• 0 . Fu:rto Rico 

fcjy Rhode Itlanri 

»2. South Carolina 

U . Tannaenc 

* 6 . Utah 

1.7. Varaont 

a > . Haahilnfton 

5 0 . M M Vlr.lnl . 

5 1 . WKconaln 

5 2 . WyOBlna 

—<..--7»,. , 

Ct.laf of Engineer. 

Chief, nationa l Cuari Buraau 

Chief Slfna l Office r 

Chief or Staff 

finance and Accounts Office , u. 8 . Arm 

Tha fluartar—atar Oenar.) 

The Surfeon General 

Second Aray 

Tr.lrd Arav 

fourth Aray 

— nn t ATM , 

lin k Ar q 

U„AMI.XH 

UBARAX 

OUHOMI I 

• IMOMI 

Gr«r,l Tota l 

{al l approPrl.tlon. ) 

400.40*23 5 

329.71*98 8 

1 1.38*62 1 

i5ja^? i 

1.98*75 3 

R«<60 5 

17.635.6 1 8 

2.3 1 6.90 3 

4637,54 0 

£600.45 9 

1.465,6 1 9 

4."M H 

8,333.34 0 

5,092.54 3 

3,378,44 7 

9.8 1 *83 4 

J.2 36.13 0 

3.1 4 f..0? l 

3,1 3 2.43 * 

3.B83.49 1 

5.708,32 5 

3.407.49 6 

T.J 3 3. 32 1 

11.277,28 9 

9,775.90 0 

7.664,36 3 

*2B*69 0 

6.285.05 4 

2.590,76 2 

3,207.07 1 

1.063.22 2 

£388,08 7 

12,193,05 3 

3.365.82 1 

21.295.92 3 

7.440,78 1 

229*93 6 

10, « 7 3, a 7 1 

5.213.44 3 

4.5H7.41 2 

14.03*58 2 

3.1 1 4.03 8 

2507.41 5 

6,833.37 4 

3.03*31 , 

9,417,2 3 1 

3.66254 5 

2.678,02 0 

7.71 1.08 3 

6.526.93 2 

4,246,54 2 

7.684,59 2 

1.85*26 9 

70.625.24 7 

2 0 7,70 3 

59.974.33 4 

3.30 0 

1.625,84 1 

2.377.22 6 

1.257,81 5 

2 7.9 3 2 

10.0 0 0 

81*81 9 

835.33 3 

914,44 1 

6 17, .if, 7 

5 32.3 2 9 

19.22 4 

3 2.52 1 

1 10.57 1 

7*72 2 

•SS. 

232.265.680 

,nmu. 

u.i.. . 

,..»<>.. 15.152 , 

1.5150 , 

..2,1.5 0 

1551.2 . 

,..»» ll.Sl l . 

15.7.55 7 

*,50.5, 7 

1,7105 0 

,.521.. 5 

122*5, 5 

.1.155 , 

19.7.057 

IIKH I 

..901.. 0 

5.25107 , 

i.39a,. ! 

1,.,.,. , 

1„0.,2 7 

.9.1.. , 

.151,7 , 

1.I7.M . 

I»U< | 

M.17 , S 

1..2161 7 

,.0,1,. "«« < 

1,50.5, 9 

,.«,,.,7 . 

I1.997.MS 

1 1 1 w • 

,.0,O.. „ 

6.291.070 

1,50.,, , 

15.172 0 

7.5.15. 5 

J.,.1.055 

1.2,1.5 ! 

1.57.91 , 

M6I.72 5 

55.191 5 

2.005.15, 

..507..2 , 

1.91., . 

2.72*,2 . 

. 7 . ,.5. . 

59.5.0.. 52 

51.51., , 

155127 , 

,100 0 

,1,7 , 

.1,5 . 

1 „ . 

for Training 

ran 

4U132.702 

4UI3270 2 

1.887.52 1 

162587 

23*82 , 

898.570 

1.901.250 

259.319 

622000 

270.640 

18*803 

341.238 

1.13 1.0 73 

392.5 . 

334.490 

1.12*7,0 

1,01*972 

747.737 

831.101 

473.0.1 

771.040 

362172 

97*79 9 

1.42*498 

1.029.377 

910.H09 

1.14*577 

945.688 

260,896 

36 7,208 

87.252 

210.988 

1.098.092 

337.636 

292120 5 

906.763 

234.374 

1.-9*214 

741.002 

.57,180 

1.46*996 

74*84 7 

283.67. 

_ ._ .672788 

40*69 2 

2.0,5.262 

441.990 

31*75 7 

,85.840 

617.7,9 

304.942 

1.0,3.47. 

182747 

_ 

Pay and Allowancea, 

Active Duty For 

Tralnlne,

 ro t I a

 * 

federal Btntua 

7012 

12614134 

12291.040 

51*66 1 

104,400 

19*303 

67*35 , 

, , 1.16 7 

232828 

, 0 7.7 8 8 

7 1.860 

1 7 5.2', 9 

185,295 

423.461 

i etu i 

41*87 9 

1 I 4. 1 4 3 

213.873 

11*24 ) 

63,526 

1 19.S64 

132733 

304.333 

212962 

4 8 1.14 2 

2 5 7. 7 6 , 

201.861 

151203 

155,294 

1 1 1,9 1 8 

52878 

61.894 

547,594 

135.213 

844,830 

201,698 

1 00.4B0 

41 0.303 

252983 

182668 

345.685 

2 0 7.035 

1 37.702 

19*41 3 

,21.347 

25 1.971 

t 62606 

96.978 

2 67.017 

) 1 1.128 

1 ,238 1 

281.315 

6 1.4 76 

323.094 

23.333 

57.607 

79.20, 

9*74 7 

4*43 7 

2 2 t 6 ? 

2698 

Tnlnlni 

7013 

10247*96 6 

10247*96 6 

5.944.994 

6 6 a 4 6 2 

21 79.28, 

5,1 ,0.446 

1. 4 4 7.1 8 0 

75*97 6 

457,77 , 

1.33*280 

2385.45 , 

987.B92 

81*29 1 

3.152,596 

2613.703 

1.7 9 7.55 0 

1.662256 

I.I 3*07 * 

2.020.C30 

74*18 2 

1.762992 

3,62 1.994 

2867,767 

2334.893 

2680,09 , 

2053.42 1 

61*37 6 

85*78 8 

,85,642 

664.335 

3.617.048 

84*42 7 

6.920,91 0 

271*04 7 

601.077 

3. 7 2 * 7 I 4 

1.890.759 

1.487,45, 

4,66*41 1 

1.912963 

695,834 

2454.91 4 

I f 1.483 

264262 1 

1.164,457 

T 7 3,2 , 3 

2022,8 0 

1.45*734 

793,174 

3.1 1*474 

4?*9H 6 

• 

pay »nd MlovanMa. 

j.ctue Duty 

For Trslnlnc, 

Fe1«r*l Statua 

701U 

33.32*774 

33.32^774 

33.32*774 

-»- . 

3.67*833 

3.594.245 

5a592 

32082 

23.626 

34.648 

20.481 

5.903 

34.242 

1&9S0 

26*>4 9 

4*86 2 

2 1 3,39 l 

23.217 

4 1,74 | 

19,396 

*66 7 

33.328 

32677 

10*04 9 

,4 1,702 

6*69 2 

33.699 

2*80 3 

1 35.432 

2*695 

15.524 

1*220 

,28 , 1 

102133 

1 5.71 9 

29*27 8 

2 3.70 0 

2*89 8 

19*44 2 

4*27 0 

5*86 6 

21*72 4 

42717 

2 1.323 

1*799 

2*39 2 

14 2.302 

71.0, t 

1*30 . 

11*73 0 

.0*28 3 

7,984 

82588 

9,723 

23.680 

17,323 

12.9 4 

1*08 1 

2.653 

an 2102060 -- Hatlona 

• 

Filer. 1 Sta-ua 

7122 

6,2 9*30 8 

6,295.508 

*2,9,90 8 

-

, 

si^si'aj 

55.79 , 

291.501 

»«• , M 6 

, 5 2 

• to,B O 

2AiJM . 

,,007 . 

5.596 

3 8 3 

7 7 0 

1.946 

*74 9 

1.0 4 6 

7 5 8 

9 ASH. 

*47 0 

1.8,8 

1,921 

29 5H 

*715 

2342 

914,1 

7 9 * 

2 0 0 

13.282 

9 0 , 

512. . 

5Si«i__ 

, 
• 

1 Tb* National Ouard 

6,1 63.1 77 

7.8 4 1.72 4 

342,570 

38.484 

40119? 

4 8,003 

1 17.316 

4 7.82 6 

4.701 

92.300 

20498 9 

72.807 

63.624 

9*68 8 

I617B 9 

7131 3 

1 1 9,488 

7 1.726 

149,199 

70.947 

294,307 

27479 4 

48169 8 

194,329 

1 t 4.758 

15,193 

36.263 

234.688 

4 4.781 

274.338 

13 1.940 

83.741 

361.798 

1 61.9 71 

44.333 

156.894 

7 1,634 

3 3 7,86 7 

t«U9 9 

74912 

162.929 

U&ftl l 

56,497 

193.429 

38.521 

326.493 

314.991 

10.000 

1.047 

9 9 9 

216 

Faderal stutu. 

8,877.756 

8.877.736 

8.877,756 

1 

Individual Clot hin» 

7051 

9,767,270 

6,079.048 

477.013 

94.299 

5 0,041 

98.405 

303.639 

1930 8 

9 7,05 8 

33.642 

19.734 

86.032 

?0*17 ? 

13.864 

83.127 

. 203.91 1 

1 33.669 

68.940 

77.918 

9 1.6 76 

157.303 

9 1.797 

137,963 

196,149 

1194 8 1 

170,083 

86.592 

32.439 

46.040 

1 6.737 

32.825 

3 17.398 

48.394 

426.149 

199.234 

40,699 

184.421 

92.019 

2 79.154 

8980 9 

26.241 

146,113 

42.418 

156.892 

192.188 

74.798 

13 7.59 1 

109.579 

4a64 3 

83.132 

17.766 

2.692,222 

386.209 

2.306.013 

DritTtteU Clothing 

federal Statua 

7052 

7.596.769 

7.996,769 

7.996.769 

Tot.l 

2102065 

150.964.260 

139.899,463 

3.964.023 

753.111 

850.594 

«'. 3 0 7, B 4 3 

8.A4Z.077 

1.002.792 

1.77*202 

1.334.973 

717.34 9 

2.371163 

It•400 1 

1747.813 

1.626,492 

maoo3 

1076.43 3 

i.oe\i?.i 

1.86*14 2 

149100 3 

1.404*7 1 

3.499,840 

4.908,800 

133110 9 

3.497.379 

1940.10 9 

1.305.524 

1.243.984 

689,79 0 

1.154.180 

5.376.736 

1.541054 

8.341.124 

1916,52 1 

1.1 4149 0 

4.21 1.738 

1.953.423 

6.139.289 

1.576,596 

1.294.213 

1381B9 6 

1.240.91 1 

i 8 3~o\22 8 

5.861.026 

1.644592 

1.210,080 

3.616.795 

3.791.679 

1.224.397 

t t *> 4.I1 4 

9 79.573 

1 1.064.799 

10 7, 70S 

1137.439 

1300 

1.621841 

4 1.992 

1.257.819 

27.932 

736.332 

7 6 1.974 

8 4 7. 9 4 1 

35192 9 

50 7.? 14 

1 5,??4 

319 2 1 

107.ft57 

70.722 

7111 

1.226,047 

1.226.047 

. ,.226.04, 

Racroltlng and 

Publicity 

711? 

399,794 

39*79 4 

59179 4 

Araory Dril l 

7211 

73148 1 

212 1 0 

1 3 8 

1.9 9 7 

1 8 8 

9 2 

7 9 8 

3 3 8 

8 8 

1.26 1 

2 7 1 

4 0 6 

8 6 3 

1 3 

1 4 6 

6 0 

1 7 4 

1 8 9 

2 2 7 

1 1 4 

6 9 2 

7 1 

4 7 3 

6 0 4 

9 2 8 

8 9 2 

2 1 8 

1.674 

95 

9 2 3 

1.702 

1.989 

170 

5 4 2 

190 

1.001 

93 

178 

2 2 7 

234 

60S 

3 8 7 

710,27 1 

170 0 

130 0 

2.980 

94,112 

14 1.390 

1 96.219 

153,678 

8 3.531 

4.232 

29,934 

2.265 

9.3*0 

Field Trsinlrif: 

96106 6 

61129 9 

? 5. ? J 0 

6.000 

1 0 3 9 

1**1 * 

347 1 9 

181 7 

4.770 

4,096 

1.014 

4,813 

?fl,335 

1 1.968 

9.617 

1 1,59 1 

7.105 

113 6 

1139 2 

17.241 

3179 3 

1442 7 

124 6 

1488 9 

1422 3 

36.147 

8,021 

2466 8 

1444 5 

149 1 

1431 3 »"« 

16.339 

194 6 

114 7 

2100 6 

2140 2 

177 7 

Ltl f 

141 9 

349.81 1 

36.918 

-.9.7,3 

97.169 

4 1.7 01, 

75,496 

6 1.646 

4992 

2.587 

1012 

1574 

• 

8,1 54.204 

7.058,95 1 

31 4.959 

1 1 1.984 

4 1.532 

94,638 

31 9,920 

3130 6 

6499 1 

70.750 

2 1,9 9 9 

1 in.? 3 8 

E00.4TI 

351310 

7427 1 

1 48,576 

9123 8 

1 78,* 92 

79,571 

12 7.5 82 

224.87 2 

1 96.248 

1 5 7.40 0 

56,173 

12 7.313 

66.096 

251.75 1 

11105 0 

14153 6 

32.206 

44.999 

1 38,167 

69.906 

12450 0 

2C4I4 9 

84.772 

B 4.800 

10'*,-JO 9 

7450 2 

3 3410 5 

49,961 

1.09125 3 

1.07a3O1 

24.992 

AKHY 

' 

T»U 

1516,36 7 

65,636 , 

271.0 . 

30..6 5 . 

52.3, , 

15631 0 

55617 7 

3071 3 

.5.72 3 

2*54 1 

19627 1 

Mil l 

53.126 

1,5.86 , 

1768. 0 

1 311067 

.0*7. 6 

,37.10 , 

1,7.0. , 

11489 4 

229.06 * 

2 4 1.49 

1311 4 

• 

5.3. . , 

13...I , 

2THH— 

^ir — 

.27,2 , 

".tZ 

U7.6I 2 

...,„ 

1,0.030 

1

 SSJ -

112.131 

, 

M 

4986,857 

47.2..6 3 

157.61, 

8.7.3 

33,23, 

107.186 

12141 , 

31.10 

.«, 362 . 

" 10.170 

75.36, 

131,I I 

96308 

128.195 

95287 

120.98' 

67.3,6 

.7.,, . 

.,.2. 8 

,:r ,03.0,2 

159.. 85 

,1,6. 6 

77.75. 

37.0,0 

F?6B3 

60.65. 

201.696 

wan , 

—!T^ — 

,09.7, 6 

—{^ — 

96.771 

62.,. 9 

6 1.328 

.2,13." 

,5, 0 

2.439 . 

2.439 . 
MiMY NATIONAL GUAItll IlKLIGAriONS 

• 

4.85 7 

246 3 

.7. 3 

„>. 

i.,.. 

<«.- . 

t » . 

Cm E»< t i n 

»•" 

•»" ' 

»"-- * • 

Other Operating 

Suppllai and 

Iqulp-tn t 

1.654.55 0 

745.26 5 

1 7,9 8 7 

6.23 1 

5.39 5 

9,80 0 

5 6, 1 0 6 

520 1 

10.2 4 1 

3, MO 

t.36 3 

| (1. = 1 4 

1 7.6 9 9 

1(1 1 

7.6 4 5 • 

29.25 4 

9.73 5 

9,57 1 

1 1,8 3 9 

10.41 2 

1 2.08 0 

32.12 3 

1 1.766 

19,55 5 

23.86 7 

1 At * 1 

22.42 3 

» " • 

K: ,7,0,: 0 

>"" bsi> .107 , 

•»l » 

Eiiii S i = — 

5SI» 

4?^ 

ftHf— 

eaMi— 

11.13 -

,3,37 0 

44,39 4 

111 4 

2.B4 0 

5.60 7 

24.52 0 

6.69 0 

21.36 1 

B.6, 4 

15.30 0 

6,8 8 4 

19,17 0 

14.37 9 

4.97 8 

15.86 9 

909.26 5 

20,26 3 

888.91 5 

8 7 

— * . 

0.780.20 6 

2.487.80 4 

3*.J O 

27.4. 8 

27.75 5 

,03.7 . 

.Ill , 

,-,0 , 

.0.02 4 

.an . 

,,..•.„ 

36.72 8 

36.7, 2 

,7.23 , 

'"" 

16.99 4 

,7.10 3 

44.23, 

47.H 7 

W ! > 

.,..0 , 

1(114 

37.4, 7 

44.41 . 

24.43 1 

417. 7 

492.40 2 

1 2 0 

2 9 0 

13.17 , • 

1(4! 

Technician* 

54.716,56 3 

54.718,56 3 

'. li , J.80 0 

2 •>£ 3 4 0 

332.18 9 

1,12127 7 

3.0 2 it 3 1 4 

471.67 2 

784.87 2 

523.52 5 

19*,«90 

1.414 il l 

5 9 1.01 1 

565.20 8 

1.313.06 9 

1.249.70 3 

8 6 7.56 4 

807.66 5 

9 9 9.29 3 

469,78 2 

1 4 5,3 • 1 

1.922.25 5 

1.416,51 8 

M 5 l.34 t 

1.432.90 6 

41Z80 2 

2 3 4.46 8 

458.4 1 5 

£ 1 17.45 8 

375,78 5 

834.61 2 

736.82 1 

30A99Z 

1.294.06 5 

562.34 5 

1.37a59 B 

A , r\ . ,. • 

f 54. 8 7 1 

454,62 1 

1.308.57 0 

llf.S H 

U. S. Propertjr 

and 'laca l Offic e 

T*eluilcl*r,e 

1 3.759,76 1 

1J.75y.76 1 

3 9 7.00 0 

1 43.52 6 

.'H'C I 

635,83 8 

142.6 1 1 

213.22 9 

1 51.83 8 

1 23.60 3 

274,96 3 

281.13 5 

1 79.42 5 

358.01 4 

.'"4.0-- 6 

242.23 9 

1 9 5.16 7 

249.64 6 

220,30 3 

359,19 4 

319,75 5 

••Ob.rjf, 

307.06 3 

1 6 1.95 8 

1 0 7,1 0 0 

1 75.97 5 

41 4.21 6 

1 36.53 7 

422.05 4 

235.23 1 

4 4 5.03 7 

I h 15 I i 

1 75.50 8 

[•0.04 3 

• 58.63 4 

294.64 1 

531.05 9 

1 8 1.74 9 

U1.793 — 

284.03 6 

1 66.73 8 

2 7 7,8 6 6 

137.491 

1 

PUArl mintmiri M 

Technlcinn* 

2J.52U.27 7 

23.32(127 7 

160.57 4 

41 3.70 7 

1.1 1 7,16 9 

336.27 9 

4 Ilit S I 

37a54 B 

785.34 1 

550.07 1 

292.19 0 

3 6 1.604 

26Q.63 6 

322.S9 6 

653,40 5 

457,65 4 

526.20 8 

703.46 7 

316.65 3 

176.05 9 . 

249.0B B 

1.051.83 8 

210,32 4 

148.63 8 

If (H I 

259.02 4 

IHSIf l 

4 17.75 5 

1 « & 11 3 

45*55 3 

I.H&T U 

" 2 3B.95- I 

585,15 6 

2 5 0,30 6 

370.87 0 

206,637 

accord Deetlrwitlon 

Froo Depoti 

2067,13 8 

i 0 6 7,1 3 8 

• 

. 

*'"|3'c£lS,"

i

* 

3.31 3.80 6 

3.313,80 6 

793.83 1 

mm 

yoTLToT 

(BUTTl 

Repair*, em) 

Utilitle e 

7.545,65 5 

7.545.65 5 

J 1,(99 

1 1 4.04 8 

95.12 5 

1 46.10 9 

305.02 9 

76.03 5 

••111 1 

A4\2$2 

224.44 1 

583.06 0 

3 2 7,5 0 7 

71.111 

77,1 H 

167,14 6 

261.54 4 

IftSt l 

1 '0.21 4 

BH.S0 3 

75.S6S 

13.90 4 

4 7.30 6 

22.69 3 

40.24 3 

S82.08 6 

1 9 7.33 2 

93.5B5 

231.20 3 

8 1 , S 3 2 

1 2 7,90 1 

Other RMllltlM , 

Renta, and 

Restorations 

2 4 7,7 9 9 

1 4. 6 7 4 

233.12 5 

204,00 9 

29.12 0 

-

Operationa l Coat* 

15.532.51 8 

15.51fa.52 9 

2.2 9 1.65 3 

1 19.19 9 

1 7. 4 3 8 

1.07H36 3 

i 

1.049,04 6 

1,368,64 6 

131780 

I.2&S.B44 

39,08 9 

MCttU O 

T9.9TS -

l.l 5 1.15 9 

15.98 9 

15,71 2 

J 
-

• 

4 H»lnl.n.nce «r>4 

M I I oumi. . 

DilT I 

1 627.67 1 

•*••* 

3*6 1 7 

60.02 5 

5128 2 

46.40 0 

mm 

• "S£sB 3 

7*30 7 

103.95 4 

I.42 B 

7.50 0 

7.50 0 

• 

Operat:. . ,-.rrlyp ,.9 ^ 

Tota l 

2102020 

439.36 3 

42*36 3 

1 4.50 0 

4.71 2 

3.16 5 

2.05 4 

1.72 0 

*"* 

i~5~.27 1 

( C M 

3.44 1 

171 8 

18.60 2 

8,02 0 

l£32 4 

1158 0 

5T5TT — 

729 6 

1.186 

4.S6 6 

1 100 0 

£30 0 

2TT3B2 

TTT79 

496 6 

23.70 0 

~ " 16.98 7 

5,10 0 

22.80 1 

l l o • 

140* 0 

7.7 7 5 

2.20 0 

6.50 0 

5,67 6 

*77 7 

105 6 

6.13 3 

4.57 5 

16.1 8 6 

£65 0 

Kertlcel Service* 1 

Non-Amy P.clllti e 

Ei^ H NadtH n 

•*Wtl « Agent 

42*36 3 

429,36 3 

1 4.5O0 

8 7 6 

4.71 2 

116 5 

£094 

£16 0 

7 9 ) 

1 4.81 9 

1 £45 8 

144 1 

171 8 

18.60 2 

8.02 0 

1 ?. 1? 4 

1 158 0 

5>8 ? 

7.2 9 6 

1.18 6 

4.30 n 

1 100 0 

£30 0 

20.38 2 

1434 9 

4.96 6 

2170 0 

t 0.OB 7 

5.10 0 

2£B0 1 

1 8 0 

10.06 0 

7.7 7 5 

£20 0 

6.50 0 

5.67 6 

477 7 

105 6 

6,1 3 3 

4.57 5 

16.18 6 

£65 0 

toFTOIrlatlon 21X2083 -

HllH«r y Construction, Amy National Qu^ni 

Total 

21X20B5 

P 

1 6.6 2*0 6 3 

1 c. f t%9i 1 

1 1S9.599 

6 3 7 

)P«» l 

9*16 9 

1 7 1.90 1 

208.73 1 

328.30 8 

110.53 1 

101268 

604.05 5 

43*76 0 

247.33 6 

547.71 9 

2S&49 9 

l!I9? l ~ 

557. iT i 

1.902 

J0**J S 

832.9. « 

5**49 3 

'Si'? * 

'26.29 5 1 

55.60 5 

146.96 3 

mm 

S1191 1 

376.40 4 

3711 

56£70 2 

1 26.10 1 

1.027.90 8 

11.14 6 

U 7.74 2 

39^57 6 

1.595.07 7 

23£17f c 

1 35.89 4 

8511 

15. 6 67.5 3 1 

15,667.53 1 

16*59 9 

374.26 7 

,,.,., "*'" 

-1.03 4 

328,50 . 

173.4. 5 

,05.65 . 

M O W 

2319. 4 

555.61 9 

• & -

236.49 9 

133.93 . 

527.(1 4 

1.75 5 

275,5 0 

551.55 9 

361., J 

756.73 9 

72. 5 4 5 

,.94 6 

,46.96 3 

26.,9 9 

• • . . • 

5 7 t . O . 

lin n 

1,6.10 , 

TM 

147.74 2 

398,57 6 

1.39195 7 

16119 3 

.35,89 4 

FMlllU H 

Rational Oiarfl 

851? 

961.53 2 

9 6 1.532 

69.81 2 

1 6 7 

6.76 2 

-£39 0 

79.1 2 0 

84.14 1 

24*14 2 

1 4 4 

13179 3 

1,05 9 

1.75 0 

5165 9 

f 

no 

11.165 

20LI2 0 

6198 3 

Appropriation 2iirao96 — 

KUltarjr Conitruetlon, Arrey Heaen e 

Tota l 

21X20% 

1 1 1.86 9 

1 1 1.86 9 

5.90 6 

105.96 3 

• 

USAF AnaOTle. 

8611 

1 1 1,86 9 

1 1 1.86 9 

5.90 6 

105.96 3 

Exr 

40U400.23 5 

329.774.98 8 

M.5.5.62 , 

2.55052 , 

6.25*60 '•»*'» 5 

17.655.6, 5 

15,6.90 3 

.637.54 0 

2.600.,5 9 

,.665.6, 3 

.946.4, 6 

6.555.5. 0 

5.092.5. 3 

357,,. 7 

9..,9.55 6 

7.23635 0 

5.1 45.02 1 

3555.49 , 

5.70.52 5 

1407.4, 6 

7.25352 . 

,,.277.28 , 

9.7 75.90 0 

6.2.505 4 

2.59076 2 

1.065.22 2 

1556.0. 7 

,1,5305 5 

3565..2 I 

2..295.9J 5 

7.4407, , 

2.256.95 6 

1U67347 I 

5.2,5.44 3 

<5.7.,4 2 

511.05 . 

1507.4, 5 

6..53.57 4 

30365, 6 

KS 

4.246.54 2 

7.684.59 2 

1.05*26 9 

7^625,24 7 

""« 

5*974,33 4 

1.625,84 1 

£377.22 6 ' 

'.257.B1 5 

91*44 1 

5Z5T T 

Arory nationa l GiiaiM, i96 0 

Crxnd Tota l 

Apportioned to State e . . Tota l 

1 - Alabana 

10. Flor'.rln 

1 6. IOv» 

1 7 . «4tBHi . 

M . Loulalan . 

2 1 . HM1 « 

22. K»»cbuMlt. . 

2

U

- Klneefota. 

B?. M'salaatppl 

2 " . IllaFllt l 

2 9 . itevad. 

1 0 . Hev HinciMr t 

J l . Hew Jer.e y 

i 2 - Hew Mexico 

W . He- Torn 

— * . north Carolina. 

15. North Dakota 

16- Ohio 

" • Oklahoma 

» . 0TM M 

—12.—p"""""-"' - t 

'•O. Puerto m 7 n ^ 

lii:—Btoi e mun i 

W . South Carol!, , 

h i . """fr """i n 

—itlj— Tennea.e e _ 

k j , Texa. 

K . Utah 

'•I. Ytrani.L . 

•»a. Vlralnl . 

» 9 . MaaMn.t.,,., 

5 0 . Heat Virgini a 

5 1 . Wl.con.j n 

5 2 . Wvpalr... 

Unapportlonad to state ) - - Tota l 

rhi.r nt in,m>. r , __ _ 

Chief. National Guard Bursaii, 

Chief Sl^na.. orrlra r 

Chief of stafr 

rinano* anrt Account, rafflata. u. s . Am / 

The Mtj^t M r, rrlrl | 

The Cuartermaator len-mj , 

Jta-SuTMo n Oenrra l 

•ai m truji 

aaMOafl Aray 

fourt h Ar- v 

nrt h Ar^r 

Sixt h Array 

HrJIfllifTll 

USABAL 

aw nu 
Air National Guard. I960 

Grand total 

Allocated to States - total. 

1. Alabama 

2. Alaska 

3* Arizona 

4. Arkansas 

5. California 

6. Colorado 

7, Connecticut 

8. Delaware 

9. District of Columbia 

10. Florida 

11. Georgia 

12. Hawaii 

13. Idaho 

14. Illinois 

15. Indiana 

16. Iowa 

17. Kansas 

18. Kentucky 

19. Louisiana 

20. Maine 

21. Maryland 

ZZ. Massachusetts 

23. Michigan 

24. Minnesota 

25. Mississippi 

26. Missouri 

27* Montana 

28. Nebraska 

29. Nevada 

30. New Hampshire 

31. New Jersey 

32. New Mexico 

33. New York 

3*. North Carolina 

35. North Dakota 

36. Ohio 

37. Oklahoma 

38. Oregon 

39. Pennsylvania 

40. Puerto Rico 

41. Rhode Island 

42. south Carolina 

43. South Dakota 

4%. Tennessee 

45. Texas 

46. Utah 

47. Vermont 

48. Virginia 

49. Washington 

50. West Virginia 

51. Wisconsin 

52. Wyoming 

Allocated to commands - total. 

National Guard Bureau 

Directorate or Administrative 

Services 

Air Materiel Command 

Yards and Docks , Bureau of 

Lackland AFB, Texas 

Office of Chief of Engineer* 

Continental Air Command 

Military Air Transport Service 

Alaskan Air Command 

Air Training Command 

Grand 

Total 

1227.585.948 

114,090,759 

2,480,315 

744,161 

2,847,175 

1,787,827 

6,279,898 

2,501,430 

1,636,240 

1,018,290 

1,808,641 

1,231,359 

3,696,753 

2,847,991 

1,465,423 

3,135,386 

2,281,557 

2,467,026 

1,863,045 

1,293,661 

1,218,286 

1,338,234 

1,738,172 

3,016,854 

3,383,506 

2,698,893 

1,866,513 

2,764,741 

1,472,846 

1,076,475 

1,140,326 

1,080,414 

2,898,200 

1,131,822 

6,248,803 

1,131,075 

1,335,971 

4,955,850 

2.433,394 

1,600,108 

4,159,404 

1,403,269 

1,009,498 

1,210,855 

1.315,793 

3,232,169 

4,113,703 

1,820,255 

1,030,919 

902,834 

1,871,716 

1,722,602 

3,201,32? 

1.179,754 

113,495.189 

99,100,069 

19,4j0 

2.732,995 

1,049,769 

886,627 

9,356,994 

133,982 

168,921 

465 

45,937 

ANG Construction-Appropriation 

57X3830 

Total 

111,454,420 

1,033,857 

5.550 

-0-

-0-

128,155 

140,000 

3,041 

322,172 

1,600 

48,997 

4.652 

132,740 

2,000 

244,950 

10,420,563 

13,800 

1,049,769 

9,356,994 

Advance 

Project 

Planning 

310 

•630,904 

148,022 

5,550 

140,000 

472 

2,000 

482,882 

13,800 

1,185 

467,897 

ANG 

Construction 

320 

$10,823,516 

885,835 

128,155 

3,041 

321,700 

1,600 

48,997 

4,652 

132,740 

244,950 

9,937,681 

1,048,584 

8,889,097 

APPENDIX 1 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD ( 

5703840 

Total 

I 168,240,012 

96,056,290 

2,095,728 

701,161 

2,304,978 

1,556,872 

5.135,070 

2,104,28? 

1,388,938 

859,449 

1,491,673 

1,099,360 

2,935,028 

2,311,524 

1,246,443 

2,769,931 

1,972,629 

2,023,762 

1,612,259 

1,128,220 

1,074,092 

1,073,612 

1,499,183 

2,525,464 • 

2,933,896 

2,207,843 

1.553,462 

2,350,527 

1,133,445 

912,081 

944,352 

900,147 

2,573,421 

1,013,273 

5.248,343 

984,967 

1,092,315 

4,114,769 

2,007,823 

1,227,108 

3,763,155 

1,066,483 

843,003 

1,041,354 

958,056 

2,792,524 

3,668,359 

1.550,256 

844,088 

784,512 

1,400,841 

1,527,224 

2,655,655 

1.053,345 

72,183,722 

69,109,828 

19,430 

2,719,195 

119,946 

168,921 

465 

•-5,937 

ANG 

Operation of 

Aircraft 

410 

•46,028,000 

. 

46,028,000 

46,028,000 
APPENDIX 

TIONAL GUARD 

< 

1BLIGATI0NS 

ANG Operations and Training-Appropriation 

ration of 

•craft 

410 

,,028,000 

6,028,000 

i 

6,028,000 

Logistical 

Support 

1,30 

122,957,098 

• 

22,957,098 

22,937,668 

19, 430 

Training 

Support 

440 

J98.702.797 

95,62'*, 817 

2,079,598 

700,161 

2,295,789 

1,543,972 

5,110,396 

2,099,823 

1,386,252 

855,651 

1,487,978 

1,094,213 

2,921,521 

2,307,665 

1,240,69? 

2,758,174 

1,963,225 

2,015,136 

1,605,469 

1,118,290 

1,071,474 

1,070,666 

1,495,298 

2,514,798 

2,922,828 

2,202,606 

1,538,145 

2,341,034 

1,127,155 

910,485 

937,710 

896,797 

2,556,848 

1,010,785 

5,226,979 

980,562 

1,087,029 

4,084,267 

1,998,269 

1,222,371 

3,740,421 

1,059,986 

837,284 

1,037,245 

953,470 

2,783,806 

3,654,244 

1,546,639 

841,592 

780,561 

1,392,813 

1,521,812 

2,643,072 

1,051,754 

3,077,980 

25,851 

2,716,860 

119,946 

168,921 

465 

45,937 

Medical 

Support 

470 

.455,860 

431,473 

16,130 

1,000 

9,189 

12,900 

24,674 

4,464 

2,686 

3,798 

3,695 

5,1*7 

13,507 

3,859 

5,744 

11,757 

9,404 

8,626 

6,790 

9,930 

2,618 

2,946 

3,885 

10,666 

11,068 

5,237 

15,317 

9,493 

6,290 

1,596 

6,642 

3,350 

16,573 

2,488 

21,364 

4,405 

5,286 

30,502 

9,554 

4,737 

22,734 

6,497 

5,719 

4,109 

4,586 

8,718 

14,115 

3.617 

2,496 

3,951 

8,028 

5,412 

12,583 

1,591 

24,387 

24,387 

Service 

Wide 

Support 

480 

196,257 

96,257 

93,922 

2,335 

ANG Personnel-Appropriation 

5703850 

Total 

•47,891,517 

17,000,613 

379,037 

43,000 

542,197 

230,955 

1,016,673 

257,143 

247,302 

158,841 

316,968 

131,999 

758,684 

214,295 

218,980 

365,455 

307,328 

394,267 

250,786 

165,441 

144,194 

264,622 

238,989 

491,390 

449,610 

491,050 

313,051 

414,214 

339,401 

164,394 

191,323 

180,267 

324,779 

118,549 

1,000,460 

146,108 

243,656 

841,081 

425,571 

373,000 

396,249 

->=',,o46 

166,495 

169,501 

357,737 

437,645 

445,344 

269,999 

186,831 

118,322 

225,925 

195,378 

545,672 

126,409 

30,890,904 

29,990,241 

886,627 

14,036 

ANG 

Personnel 

520 

$47,891,517 

17,000,613 

379,037 

43,000 

542,197 

230,955 

1,016,673 

257,143 

247,302 

158,841 

316,968 

131,999 

758,684 

214,295 

218,980 

365,455 

307,328 

394,267 

250,786 

165,441 

144,194 

264,622 

238,989 

491,390 

449,610 

491,050 

313,051 

414,214 

339,401 

164,394 

191,323 

180,267 

324,779 

118,549 

1,000,460 

146,108 

243,656 

841,081 

425,571 

373,000 

396,249 

204,046 

166,495 

169,501 

357,737 

437,645 

445.J44 

269,999 

186,831 

118,322 

225,925 

195,378 

545,672 

126,409 

30,890,904 

29,990,241 

886,627 

14,036 

Grand 

Total 

»227,585,948 

114,090,759 

2,480,315 

744,161 

2,847,175 

1,787,827 

6,279,898 

2,501,430 

1,636,240 

1,018,290 

1,808,641 

1,231,359 

3,696,753 

2,847,991 

1,465,423 

3.135,386 

2,281,557 

2,467,026 

1,863,045 

1,293,661 

1,218,286 

1,338,234 

1,738,172 

3,016,854 

3,383,506 

2,698,893 

1,866,513 

2,764,741 

1,472,846 

1,076,475 

1,140,326 

1,080,414 

2,898,200 

1,131,822 

6,248,803 

1,131,075 

1,335.971 

4,955,850 

2,433,394 

1,600,108 

4,159,404 

1,403,269 

1,009,498 

1,210,855 

1,315,793 

3,232,169 

4,113,703 

1,820,255 

1,030,919 

902,834 

1,871,716 

1,722,602 

3,201,327 

1,179,754 

113,495,189 

99,100,069 

19,430 

2,732,995 

1,049,769 

886,627 

9,356,994 

133,982 

168,921 

465 

45,937 

Air National Guard, I960 

Grand total 

Allocated to States - total. 

1. Alabama 

2. Alaska 

3. Arizona 

4. Arkansas 

5. California 

6. Colorado 

7. Connecticut 

8. Delaware 

9. District 0/ Columbia 

10. Florida 

11. Georgia 

12. Hawaii 

13. Idaho 

14. Illinois 

15. Indiana 

16. Iowa 

17. Kansas 

18. Kentucky 

19. Louisiana 

20. Maine 

21. Maryland 

22. Massachusetts 

23. Michigan 

24. Minnesota 

25. Mississippi 

26. Missouri 

27. Montana 

28. Nebraska 

29. Nevada 

30. New Hampshire 

31. New Jersey 

32. New Mexico 

33. New York 

34. North Carolina 

35. North Dakota 

36. Ohio 

37. Oklahoma 

38. Oregon 

39. Pennsylvania 

40. Puerto Rico 

41. Rhode Island 

42. South Carolina 

43. South Dakota 

44. Tennessee 

45. Texas 

46. Dtah 

47. Vermont 

48. Virginia 

49. Washington 

50. West Virginia 

51. Wisconsin 

52. Wyoming 

allocated to commands - total. 

National Guard Bureau 

Directorate of 

Administrative Services 

Air Materiel Command 

Yards and Docks , Bureau of 

Lackland AFB, Texas 

Office of Chief of Engineeis 

Continental Air Command 

Military Afc* Transport Svce 

Alaskan Air Command 

Air Training Command 

({Jani the Guard 

' Wxlian in 'Peace, Soliier in War. . . of security ani honor, for three centuries 

I haie been the custodian, I am the Quari. &Q^BfH^. 

I rias riith Washington in the iim forests, fought the riily riarrior, ani riatchei 

the iark night Son1 to the morning. • -tf#*fc' 'At Concori's briige, I firei the fateful 

shot heari 'muni the riorli. '<iS8*~ / blei on junker Hill '*&>*' My footprints 

markei the snoris at Valley "Forge. '*$&&: / pullei a mufflei oar on the barge that 

briigei the icy 'Delaware. ^Siie.* 1 stooi riith Washington on the sun-irenchei heights 

of ]forktorin. • «r*t»-- / sari the sriori surrenierei . . . I am the Quari. ,-<<fittf 

/ pullei the trigger that loosei the long rifle's ha-ioc at Neri> Orleans. ••*$$*• Ohese 

things I kneW-I rias there! -4&&± I sari both siies of the War betrieen the StatesI rias there! '-«**«*-• Ohe hill a[ San Jmn fejf the fury of my charge. 'Stffitm' Ohe 

far plains ani mountains of the Philippines echoei to my shout. .. On the Mexican 

borier I stooi.. .1 am the Quari. '<etjlk~ Ohe iark forest of the Argonne blazei riith 

my barrage, '-qtern^ Chateau Ohierry crumblei to my cannonaie. ' <SflKs-" Unier 

the arches of victory I marchei in legion -I rias there! '-*****--• / am the Quari. 

I boriei briefly on the grim Corregiior, then sari the light of liberation shine on the faces 

of my comraies. ' •&$«:-' Ohrough the jungle ani on the beaches, I fought the enemy, beat, 

batterei ani broke him. •<£%&- I raisei our banner to the serene air on Okinaria- I 

scramblei oier Normaniy's beaches-I rias there!... I am the Quari. 'OJIiBe^ Across 

the 38th Parallel 1 maie my stani. -«*»*-• / fieri MIQ Alley - I rias there!... 

I am the Quari. 4&Q£fi$g*. 

.^oliier in riar, civilian in peace... I am the Quari. ^Q^itit. 

I rias at Johnstorin, rihere the raging riaters boomei iorin the falley. • •Tjftrr • 

I crailei the crying chili in my arms ani sari the terror leaie her eyes. ' 433ge-~ / molei 

through smoke ani flame at Oexas City. -AffOse-' Ohe stricken kneri the comfort of 

my skill. '^SUK^ I iroppei the fooi that fei the starring beast on the frozen fielis of the 

riest ani through the toriering irifts I ploughei to rescue the maroonei. '^fCPfrc-' I ha-fe 

facei forriari to the tornaio, the typhoon, ani the horror of the hurricane ani flooi -

these things I knori-I rias there!... 1 am the Quari. Qttte- / hale brought a more 

abuniant, a fuller, a finer life to our youth. *&&m^ Whereter a strong arm ani faliant 

spirit must iefeni the Nation, in peace or riar, rihereier a chili cries, or a rioman 

rieeps in time of iisaster, there 1 stani... I am the Quari. "48Sfc-' Tor three centuries 

a soliier in riar, a civilian in peace- of security ani honor, I am the custoiian, nori ani 

forever. ..Iam the Quari. '^^(Sgs.