alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### iqVn^ "TVs;s v<\(x:v\ Co<N^gfy\'. ft*agc_ay^HSto^\o^ 

## : ______mi^^5^s^

_ lOraill" XJ^^n^—V^^V^^-^^Syv^ V\\X (^Wjux.c^^_\_^oqu£_^ O-v^*- ^oV»

_ ^* <- v - ^ rW».Afiosta,£leir

_3__x \a^c_e<N^ q-m\ _< v. (^^vV-V Vqool-x^v Vq VsMQ. wo^ \VC"g (YV>^vOc XP*^S-*S Ga-u^cV QV-oJc-s Ol^v^ca q-jx--". VsVf-^ *> >Q-^N-C_VZ^ *S-^AyvA OiioV f^xN&b^A: GjAN \N<.s«S> CSl-Vn^A VjONav-C^\ S

_\^±__^jG_vsi owl \j_: •VS>^A.^\ Q CiO^C^ -_^Kg\.C>LX<>^. ,Vo V^g- ^ m-^ KaS^COc- __i__»Q___v V^a-^R, \_t- <_vo r>>s.eV. y^Va ^_\ ^-JL 

### ;______, _o_. u3<N\-g. \_ \\s^ fv.oX^c. \^g>yj. <y\y 7N^

### X^Vj^--.\^*s»->r-W>ivo^-^-0-^s,-- - ___ . ... - , rjll\.^ey>8!s^^ 

### „0*3-_5^S?^SnNov_j Ai^ NT CC^\s^_\o_o^\y^£^._&*j*oalJ3&_..."^r£>_. VolQoc nstma <f<;i3vv< vj^vSxx. (XjQ£&*±-*-=-*-*- 

### •tsL 

## ^HuikJbft£mjck5_ .itBkWfiS (Loft- (Lqj*. (V_o. os-m-frvr-u-'Cft,

• (
# Michigan Guard, Liberia Partner on NCO Academy in West Africa

/ Published March 6, 2024

MONROVIA, Liberia – Instructors from the Michigan National Guard’s 177th Regional Training Institute assessed an instructor “dry-run” led by the Armed Forces of Liberia Feb. 19 to March 4 as the West African nation edges closer to standing up its own Noncommissioned Officer Academy.

The instructors convened at Camp Ware, Liberia, home of the AFL’s Armed Forces Training Command, to refine their curriculum development, administration and presentation skills. At follow-on meetings at Barclay Training Center in central Monrovia, Brig. Gen. Davidson Forleh, AFL chief of staff, thanked the U.S. instructors for exchanging knowledge with AFL counterparts.

“You could take the instructors from the AFL right now and run a professional military education course anywhere in the world,” said U.S. Army 1st Sgt. Brian Brace, State Partnership Program desk officer for the Michigan National Guard. “The Liberian instructors are passionate, knowledgeable and invested; they believe in what they are doing.”

Michigan and Liberia have partnered for 15 years under the Department of Defense National Guard Bureau SPP. The AFL was completely rebuilt after a devastating civil war ended in 2003. For this “new” AFL, developing a self-sufficient NCO Academy has been a long-term goal.

U.S. Army 1st Sgt. Derren Mazza, an instructor with the 177th RTI, began working with the AFL instructors in late 2022.

“From my first visit here 18 months ago, the AFL instructors have come light-years from where they started,” Mazza said. 

The AFL’s motto is “A Force for Good.” During 10 years of support, from 2013 to 2023, the Liberian military lived up to this creed for the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali. The AFL gained a reputation for adhering to human rights and the law of war, ideals the U.S. government has worked hard to embed into Liberia’s military institutions. The Michigan National Guard played a role in Liberia’s Security Sector Reform through the U.S. AFRICOM-sponsored Operation Onward Liberty.

“Michigan and Liberia have come a long way together; even after 15 years, this partnership continues to show its value,” said AFL Command Sgt. Maj. Cooper Manqueh. “We thank our partners for helping us develop tools for building strong NCOs because the NCO corps is the backbone of a strong army.”

In their meetings with AFL leadership, the 177th RTI instructors also presented several courses of action to launch the AFL’s first Basic Leader Course at Camp Ware. As the AFL’s NCO Academy gains momentum, the facility has the long-term potential to become a regional hub for enlisted professional military education in West Africa.

AFL 1st Sgt. Austin Doe, an AFTC instructor, said the vision for the AFL’s NCO Academy is clear: “We’re refining today’s NCOs to be the leaders of tomorrow,” he said.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS(A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITEDSTATES CODE)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Darrell Borne, the ChiefFinancial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Sciele Pharma, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of myknowledge, that:

 

This QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| July 31, 2008 | By:      | /s/ DARRELL BORNE                                     |
|--------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|               |     | Name:**Darrell  Borne                                 |
| * *           | * * | *Executive Vice President, Chief Financial  Officer,* |
| * *           | * * | *Secretary and Treasurer*                             |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Sciele Pharma, Inc. and will beretained by Sciele Pharma, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Cristino L. Perez, the Chief Financial Officer of Resolve Staffing, Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB/A  of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter  ended June 30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated: August 28, 2003



                                      /s/ Cristino L. Perez
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Name: Cristino L. Perez
                                      Title: Chief Financial Officer
To: File From: Elizabeth Kohl, DOE GC-71 Date: June 26, 2009 Re: Ex parte discussion on rare earth phosphors

On May 27, 2009, Mahima Gupta and Robert Carm ichael of Navigant Consulting spoke via phone with Dudley Kingsnorth, Indu strial Mineral Company of Au stralia. Ms. Gupta and Mr. Carmichael asked Mr. Kingsnorth about the supply of rare earth phosphors as it relates to the final rule for general service fluoresce nt and incandescent reflector lamps.

Mr. Kingsnorth related that th e major issue in phosphor suppl y is China, which has been successful in creating a monopoly. They have very large supplies of rare earth, relative to

elsewhere in the world. He didn’t believe the physical av ailability of the ra re earth phosphor was the issue, rather it was China’s market positi on. He thought cost incr eases in phosphors would not dramatically increase the cost of lamps and noted the large portion of the cost is from energy and chemical processing costs, which wouldn’t cha nge. He thought alternatives to China sources were unlikely in the near term. He noted that terbium prices have come way down, while yttrium and europium have held their valu e a little better since the peak in prices in 2008. He said more and more of the processing of the rare earth ore is going to China.

End of conversation.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                      ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

               SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF JUNE 30, 2004

      The following list of subsidiaries of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
indicates the jurisdiction of organization except for entities incorporated in
the State of Ohio:

ADLT Realty Corp. I, Inc.
Advanced Lighting Technologies Australia, Inc.
Deposition Sciences, Inc.
H & F Five, Inc.
Lighting Resources International, Inc.
Venture Lighting International, Inc.

Advanced Lighting Technologies Europe Limited, organized in the United Kingdom
Advanced Lighting Technologies (NZ) Ltd., organized in New Zealand
Advanced Lighting Technologies Asia Pte, Ltd., organized in Singapore
APL Engineered Materials, Inc., an Illinois corporation
APL Japan Company, Ltd., organized in Japan
Ballastronix, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Lighting Resources Holdings Limited, organized in Mauritius
Narva Lighting Limited, organized in the United Kingdom
Parry Power Systems Limited, organized in the United Kingdom
Unison Fiber Optic Lighting Systems LLC, organized in Delaware
Venture Lighting Europe, Ltd., organized in the United Kingdom
Venture Lighting India Limited, organized in India
Venture Lighting International, FZE, organized in Dubai, UAE
Venture Lighting International, SA Pty, organized in South Africa
Venture Lighting Power Systems - North America, Inc., organized in Nova Scotia
Venture Power Systems Private Ltd., organized in India
#### Brown vs. Pratt and another.

Appeal — Affidavit. — Where the statute required that an affidavit for an appeal from justice’s court should state that “ *the appeal*is made in good faith,” etc., an affidavit stating that “ *the arpplieation*for an appeal is made in good faith,” etc., is insufficient and fatally defective.

(4 Chand., 32.)

*306ERROR to tbe County Court for *Columbia*County.

Action on tbe case before a justice of tbe peace, and tbe plaintiff bad a verdict and judgment for one hundred dollars, and costs. Tbe defendants appealed to the county court for Sauk county, and upon trial a verdict was found for the defendants, which was set aside and a new trial granted. The venue was changed to Columbia county, and a motion was then made to dismiss the appeal for insufficiency of the affidavit for appeal, it stating that the defendants’ “ application in this suit for an appeal is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.” The court denied the motion, and the trial proceeded, when after the close of the plaintiff’s testimony, on motion of the defendants, the court nonsuited the plaintiff, and he brought a writ of error.

*W. H. Clark,*for plaintiff in error.

Collins, *Smith & Kissam,*for defendants in error.

Larrabee, J.

The affidavit made and filed with the justice was not the one required by the statute. In all cases of appeal from a justice, the affidavit must be *“*that the *appeal*is made in good faith,” etc., and not that “ the *application*for an appeal is made,” etc.

The county court should have granted the motion to dismiss, for this reason.

The judgment is therefore reversed, upon this ground. We do not deem it necessary to investigate the cause further.

Judgment reversed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40460 Conference Calendar

ROI LE' SHILOH-BRYANT, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:98-CV-37

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The district court dismissed as time-barred the federal habeas petition filed by Roi Le’ Shiloh-Bryant (Texas prisoner No. 354415), but it granted Shiloh-Bryant a certificate of appealability (COA) as to the issue whether the 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) limitations period had been tolled by the pendency of Shiloh-Bryant’s state habeas application, which was filed during the one-year grace period following the April 24, 1996,No. 98-40460 -2- effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). See Flanagan v. Johnson , 154 F.3d 196, 201 (5th Cir. 1998). Based on the facts determined by the district court, Shiloh-Bryant’s federal petition is timely if the statute of limitations was tolled by § 2244(d)(2) during the one-year grace period. This court having now resolved the tolling issue in Shiloh-Bryant’s favor, the district court’s denial of federal habeas relief is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings. See Fields v. Johnson , 159 F.3d 914, 914 (5th Cir. 1998). VACATED AND REMANDED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Moshe BenBassat, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
March 31, 2001 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd.


                                    By:    /s/ MOSHE BENBASSAT
                                           -------------------
                                    Name:  Moshe BenBassat
                                    Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                         PAGE 32
Exhibit 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Cash Technologies, Inc.
Los Angeles, California

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration
statement  No.  333-413536  on  Form  S-3,  the  registration   statements  (No.
333-117252  and  333-90680)  on  Form  SB-2  and  the  registration   statements
(333-114789, Nos. 333-90664, 333-125630,  333-131070, 333-132892, and 333-72654)
and on Form S-8 of our report dated August 17, 2005 relating to the consolidated
financial  statements of Cash Technologies,  Inc. as of May 31, 2005 and for the
year then ended,  which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.
Our report contains an explanatory  paragraph  regarding Cash Technologies Inc's
ability to continue as a going concern.

Los Angeles, California
September 13, 2006
FILED IN COURT OFAPPEALS

12th Court of Appeals District

CATHY S. LUSK, C

FILE COPY

RE: Case No. 15-0141 DATE: 8/14/2015

COA #: 12-13-00005-CV TC#: 2012-876-A

STYLE: THE GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPITAL, INC.

v. RONALD HASTEN AND CHARLENE HASTEN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas denied the motion

for rehearing of the above-referenced petition for

review.

HS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354

TYLER, TX 75702
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50204 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Saul Contreras**

**- Roman,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 473

- 1

Before **King, Costa,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges.
**Per Curiam :**  * Saul Contreras

- Roman appeals his sentence of 46 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release, which the district court imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. He asserts that the enhancement of his sentence based on his prior conviction pursuant

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circum stances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 29, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50204 Document: 00515957731 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/29/2021No. 21

- 50204

2 to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)( 2 ), which increased the statutory maximum term of imprisonment, is unconstitutional because his prior conviction is treated as a sentencing factor rather than an element of the offense that must be all eged in the indictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He concedes that the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for further review. The Government moves for summary affirmance, asserting tha t Contreras

Roman ’s argument is foreclosed. The parties are correct that Contreras

- Roman ’s assertion is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Roj as
- Luna , 522 F.3d 502, 505

- 06 (5th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is **DENIED** as unnecessary, and the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-50204 Document: 00515957731 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/29/2021
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 8154** 

JAMES DALLAS GOODSON, SR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARK; LOUIS B. C EI; D. A. BRAXTON; MR. YOUNCE, D.O.C. , Defendant s - Appellee s .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 7 :12

- cv - 00 415

- SGW

- RSB )

Submitted : April 25, 2013 Decided: April 29, 2013

Before AGEE and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
James Dallas Goodson, Sr. , Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia , for Appellee s . Unpublished opinions are not bin ding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Dallas Goodson, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order dismissing without prejudice his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (200 6 ). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

– 46 (1949). T he order Goodson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order because it is possible for him to cure the pleading deficiencies in the complaint that were identified by the district
court. See Domino Sugar Co rp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

– 67 (4th Cir. 1993 ) . Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
be fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
# Florida Guard members part of final "New Dawn" air mission

/ Published Dec. 21, 2011

KUWAIT CITY - As the remaining military forces in Iraq crossed the Iraqi border into Kuwait early morning Dec. 18, Soldiers from the Florida National Guard's 1st Battalion, 111th Aviation Regiment were right there with them.

Their mission: provide security for the ground convoys from the air, ensuring all U.S. service members exited Iraq safely.

"I am extremely proud of the Soldiers of the 1st Battalion, 111th Aviation Regiment, and all of our Soldiers and Airmen who have served in Iraq since 2003," said Air Force Maj. Gen. Emmett R. Titshaw Jr., the adjutant general of the Florida National Guard. "It is fitting that since Florida Guardsmen played a key role in the beginning hours of this conflict that we would also be there to close the mission and bring our service members back safely."

About 45 aircraft were involved in the operation at any given time, including Air Force and Navy fighters and command and control aircraft, tankers and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in addition to the 1-111th aircraft and the Army aircraft supporting several military commanders involved in the operation.

Soldiers of the unit's Headquarters and Headquarters Company and Company A conducted convoy clearance operations for the 3rd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division as they brought the last of their equipment and approximately 500 Soldiers from Contingency Operating Base Adder in Talil, Iraq, to the Khabari border crossing in Kuwait.

Soldiers from Company B conducted air movement operations from Udairi Army Air Field to Basra. They were also on hand as a quick reaction force, if needed, to bring Soldiers in for additional support if the convoy was attacked.

Soldiers from Company C were available to provide medical evacuation support. This marked one of the final missions of their deployment as the unit transitions back to the U.S. in the coming weeks.

After all of the Florida National Guard aviators landed, Army Gen. Lloyd Austin, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, held a press conference announcing all troops were out of Iraq and Operation New Dawn was complete.

These Florida National Guard Soldiers will stand in history as the last Army aviation unit to fly combat missions in support of Operation New Dawn, he said.

Three of the Florida pilots: Army Capt. Scott Riley, Chief Warrant Officer 4 Christopher Tenaro and Chief Warrant Officer 4 Ray Freeman have the distinction of being part of the first National Guard aviation unit deployed to Iraq in 2004 as well as the last National Guard aviation unit to depart Iraq in 2011.

As the war in Iraq ends, Soldiers from Company C are making their way back to the U.S. and to their families after deploying from Florida in early February.

Other Florida National Guard Soldiers from the 1st Battalion, 111th Aviation Regiment who deployed in late August will continue their deployment in Kuwait until they return to their families sometime in 2012.