20060 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices 

8 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. 

9 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22. 

10 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). 

11 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(1), (2) and (3). 

12 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. 

13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 

14 In approving the proposed rule change, the 

Commission considered the proposal’s impact on 

efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 

U.S.C. 78c(f). 

15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

settlement of securities transactions 

and, to the extent applicable, derivative 

agreements, contracts, and transactions 

and, in general, to protect investors and 

the public interest. 

The Commission finds that the 

proposed rule change is consistent with 

Section 17A of the Act 8 and the rules 

thereunder applicable to ICC, including 

the requirements of Rule 17Ad–22.9 The 

Commission believes that the part of the 

proposal separating the RR stress levels 

for the JTD and RRSR computations 

would use a more robust and 

quantitative driven approach for 

establishing the RR stress scenarios, 

resulting in more dynamic and 

appropriate estimations of the RR stress 

levels for RRSR purposes. The 

Commission finds that the incorporation 

of the Lehman Brothers default price 

scenarios into the computation of the 

Spread Response requirements 

enhances the anti-procyclical feature of 

ICC’s risk methodology. The 

Commission further finds that the 

proposed rule change that modifies the 

current GF allocation methodology to 

reflect the CPs’ total uncollateralized 

losses across all GF components 

regardless of the fluctuation of the CPs’ 

uncollateralized losses with respect to 

each GF component would result in 

more stable attributions of GF 

contributions to individual CP/client 

portfolios. Finally, the Commission 

finds that the proposed non-substantive 

and clarification changes are each 

designed to more accurately reflect 

ICC’s current practices. 

Therefore, the Commission believes 

that the proposal is designed to promote 

the prompt and accurate clearance and 

settlement of securities transactions and 

derivative agreements, contracts and 

transactions cleared by ICC and, in 

general, to protect investors and the 

public interest, consistent with Section 

17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 10 and Rules 

17Ad–22(b)(1), (2) and (3).11

IV. Conclusion 

On the basis of the foregoing, the 

Commission finds that the proposal is 

consistent with the requirements of the 

Act and in particular with the 

requirements of Section 17A of the 

Act 12 and the rules and regulations 

thereunder. 

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to 

Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,13 that the 

proposed rule change (File No. SR–ICC– 

2014–24) be, and hereby is, approved.14

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.15

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08455 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

Surrender of License of Small 

Business Investment Company 

Pursuant to the authority granted to 

the United States Small Business 

Administration under the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, as 

amended, under Section 309 of the Act 

and Section 107.1900 of the Small 

Business Administration Rules and 

Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to 

function as a small business investment 

company under the Small Business 

Investment Company License No. 03/

03–0252 issued to MidCap Financial 

SBIC, L.P., said license is hereby 

declared null and void. 

United States Small Business 

Administration. 

Dated: April 8, 2015. 

Javier E. Saade, 

Associate Administrator for Investment and 

Innovation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08504 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice: 9097] 

30-Day Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection: Evacuee Manifest and 

Promissory Note 

ACTION: Notice of request for public 

comment and submission to OMB of 

proposed collection of information. 

SUMMARY: The Department of State has 

submitted the information collection 

described below to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

approval. In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 we 

are requesting comments on this 

collection from all interested 

individuals and organizations. The 

purpose of this Notice is to allow 30 

days for public comment. 

DATE(S): Submit comments directly to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) up to May 14, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Direct comments to the 

Department of State Desk Officer in the 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs at the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB). You may submit 

comments by the following methods: 

• Email: oira_submission@

omb.eop.gov. You must include the DS 

form number, information collection 

title, and the OMB control number in 

the subject line of your message. 

• Fax: 202–395–5806. Attention: Desk 

Officer for Department of State. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Direct requests for additional 

information regarding the collection 

listed in this notice, including requests 

for copies of the proposed collection 

instrument and supporting documents, 

to Derek Rivers, Bureau of Consular 

Affairs, Overseas Citizens Services (CA/ 

OCS/PMO), U.S. Department of State, 

SA–17, 10th Floor, Washington, DC 

20036 or at RiversDA@state.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

• Title of Information Collection: 

Evacuee Manifest and Promissory Note. 

• OMB Control Number: 1405–0211. 

• Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

• Originating Office: Bureau of 

Consular Affairs, Overseas Citizens 

Services (CA/OCS). 

• Form Number: DS–5528. 

• Respondents: U.S. citizens, U.S. 

non-citizen nationals, lawful permanent 

residents, and third country nationals 

applying for emergency loan assistance 

during an evacuation. 

• Estimated Number of Respondents: 

525. 

• Estimated Number of Responses: 

525. 

• Average Hours per Response: 20 

minutes. 

• Total Estimated Burden: 175 hours. 

• Frequency: On Occasion. 

• Obligation to Respond: Required to 

Obtain Benefits. 

We are soliciting public comments to 

permit the Department to: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

information collection is necessary for 

the proper functions of the Department. 

• Evaluate the accuracy of our 

estimate of the time and cost burden for 

this proposed collection, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used. 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected. 

• Minimize the reporting burden on 

those who are to respond, including the 

use of automated collection techniques 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES