alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 6417

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SHEDRICK OWEN GRAVES, a/k/a Shedrick Graves, a/k/a Shadrick Graves , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Rebecca Beach Smith , Senior District Judge. ( 4:06

- cr - 00112

- RBS

- TEM

1 )

Submitted : March 19, 2021 Decided: July 2, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge , and MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

. Chief Judge Gregory dissents.

Shedrick Owen Graves, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Shedri ck Owen Graves appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) and § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 . We have reviewed the record and find no

rever sible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Graves , No. 4:06

- cr - 00112

- RBS

- TEM

- 1 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 17 , 2020 & entered Mar. 18, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
1 

# Exhibit C:

SteadiDrone MAVRIK X8 Features and Specifications

Photo: SteadiDrone MAVRIK X8TM2 

# SteadiDrone MAVRIK X8 TM

FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS

Aircraft Type:

Multi Rotor X8 Formation

Description:

The MAVRIK X8TMis a Multirotor, in the X8 format for redundancy and increased payload, the MAVRIK

features a Rapid Deploy Frame TM, and an integrated gimbal for a variety of payloads.

Key Features:

The SteadiDrone MAVRIK X8TM Key Features include...

 Highest quality carbon fiber and aluminum constructed 'Rapid Deploy' folding airframe

 Fully adjustable rail supported brushless gimbal system powered by 32bit AlexMos

 Gimbal supports huge range of cameras and is fully adjustable for short or longer lenses

 180 Degrees gimbal tilt angle, from facing over 90° straight down to 90° straight up, ideal for

inspection work

 Adjustable rail supported battery bay for mounting different size batteries, on top or bottom

 High strength impact resistant top dome cover with integrated LED, Safety Switch and USB

interface

 Removable airframe hatch for easy access to all electronics with no tools required!

 Quick release landing gear legs with clip on holder that setup in seconds, again no tools needed

 Vibration damping rail system that can be setup for different camera/payload weights

 Vibration damping motor mount system for high frequency motor vibration reduction

 Airframe side panel enclosures ensure electronics are protected and hidden

Advanced GPS Features:

 3DR PixHawk® GPS Flight controller with advanced GPS Features

 'Follow Me' Have the MAVRIKTM follow you or your subject around

 'Loiter' Accurate GPS position and altitude hold modes keep your drone where you want it

 'Return to Home' With a flip of the switch have the drone return home and land autonomously

 Advanced Waypoint navigation, mission planning and more!

Physical Specifications:

 Dimensions open (LxWxH; mm) 500mm x 775mm x 205 mm

 Dimensions Folded (LxWxH; mm) 585mm x 220mm x 115mm

 Diagnal length: 814mm

 Weight of Airframe: 1300g3  Weight RTF exc LiPo : 2650g

 Weight RTF inc LiPo : 3650g

 Weight MAX Payload: 2000g (sUAS), 800g (gimbal)

 Weight MAX AUW : 4950g

Flight Envelope Specifications:

 Max forward speed: 18 m/s

 Max Climb rate: 9 m/s

 Max decent rate: 6 m/s

 Max Radio Range: 1500m

 Min operating temperature: 23 degrees F

 Max operating temperature: 122 degrees F

 Max operating wind: 11 m/s

 Flight time: less than 25 min*

Specs listed for standard RTF (APC Props)

Carbon Props +/= 20

‐ 30% increase in flight time

Duration and payloads may differ depending on ASL, temps etc.4 

# SteadiDrone MAVRIK X8 TM

PRODUCT BROCHURE567
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Sonic Innovations, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Samuel L. Westover, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael
M. Halloran, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ SAMUEL L. WESTOVERSamuel L. WestoverChairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay 11, 2009




/s/ MICHAEL M. HALLORANMichael M. HalloranVice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 11, 2009


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                    STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIOS



                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         PREDECESSOR                              SUCCESSOR
                                           --------------------------------------    --------------------------------------
                                                                          Nine         Three
                                                                         Months        Months
                                                                         Ended         Ended
                                                                      September 30,  December 31,
                                              1993          1994          1995          1995          1996          1997
                                           ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
                                                                    (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                        <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES                   28,804        31,356        16,963         1,778        (2,373)        9,623
FIXED CHARGES (EXCLUDING                        1,773         2,597         3,707         5,926        27,502        22,621
                                           ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
CAPITALIZED INTEREST)                          30,577        33,953        20,670         7,704        25,129        32,244


DIVIDED BY:                                     1,773         2,597         3,707         5,926        27,627        22,931
FIXED CHARGES                                    17.2x         13.1x          5.6x          1.3x           .9x          1.4x
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

19193 

Title 3— 

The President 

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 69 / April 10, 2015 Documents / Presidential Documents 

Notice of April 8, 2015 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Somalia 

On April 12, 2010, by Executive Order 13536, I declared a national emergency 

pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 

1701–1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 

security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the deterioration of the security situation and the persistence of violence in Somalia, 

acts of piracy and armed robbery at sea off the coast of Somalia, which 

have repeatedly been the subject of United Nations Security Council resolutions, and violations of the arms embargo imposed by the United Nations 

Security Council. 

On July 20, 2012, I issued Executive Order 13620 to take additional steps 

to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13536 

in view of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2036 of February 

22, 2012, and Resolution 2002 of July 29, 2011, and to address: exports 

of charcoal from Somalia, which generate significant revenue for al-Shabaab; 

the misappropriation of Somali public assets; and certain acts of violence 

committed against civilians in Somalia, all of which contribute to the deterioration of the security situation and the persistence of violence in Somalia. 

Because the situation with respect to Somalia continues to pose an unusual 

and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the 

United States, the national emergency declared on April 12, 2010, and 

the measures adopted on that date and on July 20, 2012, to deal with 

that emergency, must continue in effect beyond April 12, 2015. Therefore, 

in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 

U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared 

in Executive Order 13536. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

April 8, 2015. [FR Doc. 2015–08420 

Filed 4–9–15; 08:45 am] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PRESDOCSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 -0057 IN THE MATTER OF: D.A.T. A Youth. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 15, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 11 2021

08/11/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0057
? b

b

b 8

6 œ

> œ> œ> œ. > Allegro

f

œ œ

> œ> nœ.

> bœ œ

> œ> œ> œ> œ>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m.100, 2nd beat

fi

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ. œ J

œ œ Jœ 5

P

œ Jœ œ J

œ œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ J

œ œ J

œ

? b

b

b

œ Jœ œ

. œ. œ. œ J

œ nœ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ 13

P

œ Jœ œ J

œ œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ J

œ œ Jœ œ J

œ œ

. œ

. œ

. œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

? b

b

b

 ̇. œ J

œ œ Jœ 21

P

œ Jœ œ J

œ œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ J

œ œ Jœ œ J

œ œ

. œ

. œ

. œ J

œ œ Jœ

f

 ̇. œ Jœ œ Jœ 29

P

œ Jœ œ

. œ. œ.

? b

b

b

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ J

œ nœ

. œ. œ

.  ̇.  ̇. œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.

J

œ

‰ ‰

œ.

P

œ Jœ œ Jœ 37œ Jœ œ J

œ œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ J

œ œ J

œ

? b

b

b

œ Jœ œ

. œ. œ. œ J

œ nœ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ 45

P

œ Jœ œ J

œ œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ J

œ œ Jœ œ J

œ œ

. œ

. œ

. œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

? b

b

b

 ̇. œ J

œ œ Jœ 53

P

œ Jœ œ J

œ œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ J

œ œ Jœ œ J

œ œ

. œ

. œ

. œ J

œ œ Jœ

f

 ̇. œ Jœ œ Jœ 61

P

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Official Song of the National Guard Bureau

1st Trombone

Words and Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

40th Army Band, VTARNG

? b

b

b

œ Jœ œ

. œ. œ. œ J

œ œ Jœ œ J

œ nœ

. œ. œ

.  ̇.  ̇. œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.

J

œ

‰ ‰

œ.

P

œ Jœ œ Jœ 69œ Jœ œ J

œ œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇.

? b

b

b

œ Jœ œ J

œ œ Jœ œ

. œ. œ. œ J

œ nœ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ œ Jœ 77

P

œ Jœ œ

J

œ œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ J

œ œ Jœ œ J

œ œ

. œ

. œ

. œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

? b

b

b

 ̇. œ J

œ œ Jœ 85

P

œ Jœ œ J

œ œ

J

œ œ

. œ. œ.  ̇. œ J

œ œ Jœ œ J

œ œ

. œ

. œ

. œ J

œ œ Jœ

f

 ̇. œ Jœ œ Jœ 93

P

œ Jœ œ

. œ. œ. œ J

œ œ Jœ

? b

b

b

œ Jœ nœ

. œ. œ

.  ̇.  ̇. œ J

œ œ

. œ. œ. fi J

œ

‰ ‰ Œ.

Ceremonial version,

from m.4

‰ œ

- œ

- œ œ œ 101 -

F

œ J

œ œ J

œ œ. œ. œ œ

- œ

- œ

J

œ

- œ œ œ

- œ œ œ

-

? b

b

b

œ

- œ œ œ œ œ œ J

œ œ J

œ œ. J

œ ‰ ‰ ‰ œ

- œ

- œ œ œ 109 - œ J

œ œ J

œ œ. œ œ

- œ

- œ. J

œ

‰ ‰ œ

- œ œ œ œ œ œ

-

œ œ œ œ œ

? b

b

b

œ J

œ œ J

œ J

œ

‰ ‰ Œ. ‰ œ

- œ

- œ œ œ 117 - œ J

œ œ J

œ œ. œ. œ œ

- œ

- œ

J

œ

- œ

-

œ œ œ œ œ œ

- œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ

? b

b

b

œ. Jœ ‰ ‰ ‰ œ

> œ

> >œ. 125 œ.

J

œ

‰ ‰ ‰ œ

> œ

>>œ. J

œ

‰ ‰

>œ. œ

> œ

> œ

> œ

>

J

œ

>

ƒ

œ

>

J

œ

> œ. > > ̇.

sfp

 ̇.  ̇. Jœ

^

‰ ‰ Œ.

ƒ

2 ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

-1st Trombone-
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3773 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3773

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the first-time 
             homebuyer tax credit, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2009

   Ms. Edwards of Maryland (for herself, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Broun of 
Georgia, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Van Hollen, and Mr. LoBiondo) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the first-time 
             homebuyer tax credit, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (h) of section 36 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 1, 2009'' and 
inserting ``June 1, 2010''.
    (b) Election To Treat Purchase in Prior Year.--Subsection (g) of 
section 36 of such Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``December 1, 2009'' and inserting 
        ``January 1, 2010'', and
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``In the case of a 
        purchase of a principal residence after December 31, 2009, and 
        before June 1, 2010, a taxpayer may elect to treat such 
        purchase as made on December 31, 2009, for purposes of this 
        section (other than the preceding sentence and subsections (c) 
        and (f)(4)(D)).''.
    (c) Extension of Waiver of Recapture.--Subparagraph (D) of section 
36(f)(4) of such Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``December 1, 2009'' and inserting ``June 
        1, 2010'', and
            (2) by striking ``in 2009'' in the heading and inserting 
        ``after 2008''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to residences purchased after November 30, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR

. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40717 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. HERBERT LIMBI VILLAGRAN Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-134-ALL
Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Herbert Limbi Villagran appeals the sentenc e imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for transportation of illegal aliens by means of a motor vehicle for private financial gain. Villagran argues that the district court erred in increasing his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6) after finding that the offense “involved intentionally or recklessly creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person.” The question whether a defendant’s conduct creates a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 16, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40717

2 is a legal question, and therefore is reviewed de novo. U nited States v. SolisGarcia, 420 F.3d 511, 514 (5th Cir. 2005). The record reflects that Villagran was driving a tractor trailer carrying five illegal aliens. Three of the five aliens were inside of a box under the bunk of the sleeping compartment. The box under the bunk was not intended for human travel. Because the aliens were in a closed compartment, the aliens could not easily communicate with the driver of the vehicle. Moreover, if the tractor trailer had been involved in an accident, no one would think to look for injured passengers in thecompartment under the bunk. Given that three of the five aliens that Villagran concealed under the bunk in thesleeper compartment faced a greater risk than ordinary passengers traveling without seatbelts, the district court’sadjustment under § 2L1.1(b)(6) wasnoterror. Id. at 516 (5th Cir. 2005).AFFIRMED.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 6 03 01

MARK MULLER , Plaintiff

–

Appell ant,

versus MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY; JOHN/JANE DOES, 1−10,

Defendant s

– Appell ees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi No. 1:17

- CV

- 339

Before DAVIS , SMITH , and COSTA , Circuit Judges

. P ER CURIAM : *

Mark Muller sued his former employer, Mississip p i Power Company, for age discriminati on under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 7, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-60301 Document: 00515260869 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2020No. 19

- 60301

2 retaliatory discharge under Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the employer on both claims. Muller appeals, and we affirm.
The district court issued an impressive eigh teen

- page Memorandum Opinion and Order explaining the reasons for the summary judgment. On the retaliation claim, the court concluded that Muller was not engaged in protected activity in making the particular statements for which he alleges he was
retalia ted against. The court concluded that “Muller has failed to show that a reasonable person could have believed that the incidents he opposed violated Title VII.” As for age discrimination, the district court opined that references to Muller’s age were not direct evidence of discrimination because, inter alia , the conversations “occurred after the decision had been made to terminate Muller.” The court concluded that “Mississippi Power has pr ovided a legitimate, non

discriminatory reason for termination.” For example, the court noted that “Mu l ler breached confidentiality” and “was loud, angry, and disrespectful toward management when he was confronted about the breach.”

We have reviewed th e briefs, pertinent parts of the record, and the applicable law. We have heard the oral arguments of counsel. There is no error, reversible or otherwise. The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essen

tially for the reasons carefully given by the district cour t. Case: 19-60301 Document: 00515260869 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/07/2020
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1466

CAROLYN R. STURGILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-96-127-B) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 14, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carolyn R. Sturgill, Appellant Pro Se. David Marcellus Frazier, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Carolyn R. Sturgill appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sturgill v. Apfel, Comm’r of Soc. Sec. , No. CA-96-127-B (W.D. Va. Feb. 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3871 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3871

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 5-[[4-
   (acetylamino)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]azo]-6-amino-4-hydroxy-, 
                            monosodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 5-[[4-
   (acetylamino)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]azo]-6-amino-4-hydroxy-, 
                            monosodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-NAPHTHALENESULFONIC ACID, 5-[[4-(ACETYLAMINO)-2-
              (TRIFLUOROMETHYL)PHENYL]AZO]-6-AMINO-4-HYDROXY-, 
              MONOSODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Naphthalenesulfon                                                  31/2011.......
                        ic acid, 5-[[4-
                        (acetylamino)-2-
                        (trifluoromethyl)
                        phenyl]azo]-6-
                        amino-4-hydroxy-,
                        monosodium salt.
                        (CAS No. 75198-93-
                        5) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```