alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Alexander Rose *vs.*John and A. Hamilton.

June. 1787.

Case xxxiv,

a. b. p. 128,

On application foe injunction, opposition may be made on the merits, as they are disclosed by the bill: Nothing extraneous to be admitted.

On reading this bilí, and on some contention arising relative to entering into the merits thereof, the court ruled, that upon an application for an injunction, the merits may be entered into without answer filedj but the adverse solicitor is in his opposition to confine himself to the allegations in the bill, and cannot produce any extraneous or foreign matter in proof, until the answer be brought in. The merits of this case being argued by the solicitors, Mr. Drayton and Mr. Read, it w'as decreed ib,at the bill be dismissed with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3624 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3624

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ban the use of the 
        arsenic compound known as roxarsone as a food additive.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2009

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ban the use of the 
        arsenic compound known as roxarsone as a food additive.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Poison-Free Poultry Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. BAN ON USE OF ARSENIC COMPOUND KNOWN AS ROXARSONE AS FOOD 
              ADDITIVE.

    (a) Ban.--Section 409 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
(21 U.S.C. 348) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(k) Ban on Use of Arsenic Compound Roxarsone.--The arsenic 
compound known as roxarsone--
            ``(1) shall not be subject to section 201(s)(4); and
            ``(2) is deemed to be an unsafe food additive within the 
        meaning of this section.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment to Definition of Animal Feed.--Section 
201(w) of such Act (21 U.S.C. 321(w)) is amended by inserting after 
``such paragraph or section,'' the following: ``and in section 
409(k),''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


We, Tim Bumgarner and Byron Hudson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of our knowledge, the Quarterly Report of American Pallet Leasing, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents
in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
American Pallet Leasing, Inc.



                  By:      /s/ Tim Bumgarner
                           ---------------------------------------
                           Tim Bumgarner, Chief Executive Officer


                  By:      s/ Byron Hudson
                           ---------------------------------------
                           Byron Hudson, Chief Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00396-CR

Todd S. PERDOK,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CR-8186

Honorable George H. Godwin, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 20, 2010

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal by withdrawing his notice of appeal. 

The motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Westell Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge: 

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

 

/s/ E. VAN CULLENS  

E. Van Cullens

Chief Executive Officer 

June 14, 2006

 

/s/NICHOLAS C. HINDMAN, Sr.

Nicholas C. Hindman, Sr.

Chief Financial Officer 

June 14, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc., (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 2, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JON A.
DELUCA            
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: April 2, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    CHARLES S. WIESENHART
JR.
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

HoBorable Y. 0. ruTera 

sooretary or Mate 

All&in, Tafu 

of faur letter or 

011 ~IWTI this dea& 

allah supplies being 

for D~~tribuldora a0 

0s yori6amas. we uldorstad 

631 repmsentatire would not 

r~tual17 ~l%e the wss but would 

g o lic it o r deraa na l o a 4 them o n to 

the o r fio ia ale r the o o mp a nin y M o d00 a mI th a t o o ntr a oTtOe Ul4 b e wep a r ed a na a r a o ufboy a the o ffiwrr 
523 

2omra8l~Y* O.ROWar8 -Page 2 

0f fd8tribuid~ a0 ~etr01~8 mtmm0s 

in x0h0 cwtwhg the a0 0e th084 

proaPotf4, hot that aoturl aeiiry os 

tltew podwta T07da be ma8 in Toxu, 

aLthor b7 mhlpont or the pwaalet8 fw?m 

mxlco Into TOXW or by ulo dalivery of 

wah pro&tot8 out ot storage attho 

plamt of Erstarn Statea Petroleuai Co, 

P-Y- se further d%rotala umt it lAl 

contemplated that nut of the orders 

takem by suoh representative Toula bo 

order0 plawd by persons or compazlise 

doing buoinoss ti statoe (in the United 

Statss) other than T~xns, but that eoxm 

csales aml deliveries would be mde to 

p3roon6 or com~eslooatedinTexai3 

anll that som of such asliveries ta Texas citiews c&N bo ando from the storagii at tic3 plant OP. Zaastm Strrtos P&2%- 

leum Cozqany in Tams. 

*The bbdcan Cworapltnt througliits 

Yloa-Consul, 6r. Fldenaio Sorio B., ;Izs 

asked tbisdspartmentrhefhor the cow 

pany Till bTe t0 f&O Od 8 pQ2Zdt t0 do 

buahmwlninretam. 

Article 1629 of the Reviuod Civil Statutes 

pmidw I 

m&g corporatfoa for peeuaiary 

p-of%, excspt LB a%roinaFter FOTidOd, OSp;aniWd Or OrWt%d UndOX' 

tha lws of my other State, or of 

any territory of the United Stotss, 

or of any Bxlnlofpa1ity of sud.l state 

or territory or of any foraigu goTernmt, dcipdits, ae- 
524 

olring to truwaot or soliait bus* 

lnTcuas,orto establish ageneral sr 

2zz-%~r&~&s2?;a:::1 

duly wrtaiui oopy Of its artio1os of 

i.ncorporatlon) and tJLareupon suah orriolal shall issue to suoh corporation a 

permit to trmnmwt businefJo In thio 

State for a period o? ten year8 fro8 

the date of w riling suoh articles of 

lnaorporatbion. If suoh corporation Is 

created for me than on0 purpose, the 

perdt cn7 be limited to one cc more 

pzrposes .’ 

It is plain iron: your ststzmont that Distribnidora de Petroleos yerioanos Contemplates doing buslness in foras uithln the n@+oing of the above-quoted 

Article, cum%, ther%Pore, ia requirea to 0bta.l.n a parsdt 

to transaot bueiness ln this' Btate. 

xt is lsinnteria1 that the ctoolt of this corporation ls ouned by the Uoxlosa Gwemamxt, the mtatute takes 

M IIOtd.00 Or StOCk OmOrShip, it iS CiOlW3Rl~ On17 Tith 

the oorporata donioile. The permit statute4 applies to 

- corporatians orgadaal or Orsatod under the lat#af * 

forei@ L;overnaent, sorersipt~ Or Elimiolpality.s 

The foreign co 

xcr 

Sti01~a0iogb~ina88inthi~ 

Staku&8ralauful pe t is subjwt to ooit in our 

State oourts8 cnea without a pmadt it would be subjwt 

to t&u3 juriediotioal sf our eo-urt to the cixtent of peport7 

ounedbythe corporrtinnrit!dn the jurimi.%Ctbm of the 

state, whet&w juriodlotion for poreanal j~nt ma 

be obtained or no&
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonic Innovations, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew G. Raguskus, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sonic Innovations, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                       
|----- |  | ----------------------
|      |  | /s/ ANDREW G. RAGUSKUS
|Name: |  | Andrew G. Raguskus    
|Date: |  | August 9, 2004        



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Sonic Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by Sonic Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AFS-10-201-E 

Jul 12 2010 

Mr. Daniel Waters 

Chief Instructor 

Falcon Aviation Academy 

95 East Aviation Way 

Newnan, GA 30263 

Dear Mr. Waters: 

This is in response to your letter dated March 1, 2010, petitioning the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Falcon Aviation Academy (Falcon Aviation) for an 

exemption from part 141, appendix E, of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. 

The FAA finds that your request is based on the premise that additional pilot training, in 

particular for an airline transport pilot (ATP) certificate, is beneficial. Since you are not 

requesting relief from the ATP practical test eligibility requirements, your objective to provide 

additional part 141 pilot training to ATP standards can be accomplished under § 141.57 – 

Special curricula. Therefore, an exemption is not needed. If you do not wish to pursue 

approval of a part 141 special curriculum, then you should consider providing pilot training to 

ATP standards outside of part 141 under part 61. 

The FAA will take no further action on your petition and Docket No. FAA-2010-0283 is 

being closed. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brad Pearson 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Resolve Staffing,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 1, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Cristino L. Perez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Cristino L. Perez
--------------------------
Cristino L. Perez
Chief Financial Officer
August 4, 2003
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS I N TH E ES TAT E OF: E T HE L L AD I

NE S W E ZY S T AM NITZ, DECEASED. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 08 -0 00 81 -C V

Appea l from the Probate Court No. 2 of El Paso County , Texas (TC# 2006-P00369-2)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Pending be fore the Court i s an i n t erlocutory appea l of an orde r re ndere d on Fe bruar y 19, 20 08 , b y the Pr ob a te Cou rt No

. 2, El Pa so County , Te xas. Ap pe lla nt no w a sk s th is C ou rt

to d ism iss thi s a pp e a l w ithpr e

jud ic e fo r t

he re a so n th a t th e pa

rt ie s h a ve a greed to cert a in f a c ts m a kin g thi s appea l moot. Appellee has not objec ted to the motion, and there is no indication that this Court’s dismiss al would pre vent Appell ee from seeking relief to which she would other wise be e ntitled. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)( 1). We there fore g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l with prejudice. B e c a us e the mot ion

to di sm iss is s ile nt a s to ho w t o s ha re c os ts, the c os ts w ill be ta xed a g a ins t Appellant. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(d).

KENNET H R. CARR, J ustice October 23, 2008 B e f o r e C h e w , C

. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d C a r r , JJ.
# W. Va. National Guard trains with multi-national forces 

/ Published Oct. 1, 2018

HOHENFELS, Germany - National Guard service members from 119th Sapper Engineer Company, 1092nd Engineer Battalion, based in Moundsville, West Virginia, trained on war-fighting and combat engineer tactics at the 7th Army Training Command's Joint Multinational Readiness Center in Hohenfels, Germany on Sept. 26, alongside NATO allies and partners participating in Saber Junction 18.

 Saber Junction 18 is the 173rd Airborne Brigade's combat training center certification exercise, taking place on the Grafenwoehr and Hohenfels training areas from Sept. 4 - Oct. 1, 2018. The U.S. Army Europe-directed exercise is designed to assess the readiness of the brigade to accomplish two objectives: conduct unified land operations in a joint, combined environment, and to promote interoperability with nearly 5,500 participating allies and partner nations.

 "For this mission, we were part of the opposing force to the 173rd Airborne Infantry Brigade Combat Team." said Sgt. Jacob Robinson, a team leader, 119th Sapper Company. "We had to protect an airfield from the Americans using it for resupply purposes. It trained us on our tasks as engineers, building obstacles, laying minefields, supporting fighting positions - , always on our secondary mission as infantrymen."

 Robinson is one of several combat engineers on his first overseas training mission. He and others elaborated on what engineers bring to the table during the exercise.

 "We're multi-purpose," said Sgt. Ashli Richards, a team leader, 119th Sapper Engineer Company. "A lot of the military can use the engineers for their operations, such as being able to identify a minefield, recommending an alternate route the unit can take on their way somewhere, and clearing obstacles with demolitions if need be."

 Richards is one of the first female Soldiers in West Virginia to attend and graduate the Combat Engineer Course at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. She and many of the Soldiers in the engineering company had their first experience working with multi-national military forces in an overseas training environment.

 Capt. Bryan Pauley, commander, 119th Sapper Co., said working with the Bulgarian and Ukrainian light infantry forces fostered cooperation, firmness and collaboration on their methods of war fighting.

 "Their leaders have different leadership styles," said Pauley. "I found myself saying, ‘That's a good idea, and have you maybe thought of this?' I said things like, ‘Hey that's a great plan, I'll bet we can improve on that.' They picked up on that quickly and they were always thankful and our fighting side by side with them as riflemen fostered better ways for us to help them protect themselves and ourselves."

 Coming up next for the engineering company will be a rotation at the Joint Readiness Training Center at Fort Polk, Louisiana, in 2019.

 "I hope what we've learned here as a unit becomes a new standard, a new benchmark to get better," said Pauley. "We want to build on this first time overseas training experience, so the next time we are overseas, either here or somewhere else, we are even more ready."
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE

Appellate case name: General Metal Fabricating Corporation, G. M. F. Leasing Inc., and 

Arnold Curry v. John Stergiou and Main Marine Repair and Industrial 

Cleaning Co.

Appellate case number: 01-11-00460-CV

Trial court case number: 0000900

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

The Court requests that John Stergiou and Main Marine Repair and Industrial Cleaning 

Co. respond to the “Further Motion for Rehearing En Banc” filed by General Metal Fabricating 

Corp., GMF Leasing, Inc., and Arnold Curry. The response is due fifteen days from the date of 

this notice.

Clerk’s signature: /s/ Christopher A. Prine

Date: June 19, 2013
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Wayne R.
Hellman and/or Steven C. Potts his attorney-in-fact, with the power of
substitution, for him in his capacity as director of Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc., to sign the Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year
ending on June 30, 2001, and any amendments thereto, and to file the same with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorney-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

SIGNATURE                           TITLE                          DATE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Francis H. Beam                 Director               September 28, 2001
------------------------------
Francis H. Beam

/s/  John E. Breen                  Director               September 28, 2001
------------------------------
John E. Breen

/s/  John R. Buerkle                Director               September 28, 2001
------------------------------
John R. Buerkle

/s/  Theodore A. Filson             Director               September 28, 2001
------------------------------
Theodore A. Filson

/s/ Louis S. Fisi                   Director               September 28, 2001
------------------------------
Louis S. Fisi

/s/  John Gonzalez                  Director               September 28, 2001
------------------------------
John Gonzalez

/s/  Wayne R. Hellman               Director               September 28, 2001
------------------------------
Wayne R. Hellman

/s/  Thomas K. Lime                 Director               September 28, 2001
------------------------------
Thomas K. Lime

/s/  Alan J. Ruud                   Director               September 28, 2001
------------------------------
Alan J. Ruud

/s/  A Gordon Tunstall              Director               September 28, 2001
------------------------------
A Gordon Tunstall
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of SPACEHAB, Incorporated, a Washington
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10K for the year ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dr. Shelley
A. Harrison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. (S) 1350), that to my
knowledge:

     (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Dr. Shelley A. Harrison
---------------------------
Dr. Shelley A. Harrison
Chief Executive Officer
September 16, 2002