alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001021810
<NAME>                        InteliData Technologies Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                                      8,496
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (523)
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           10,558
<PP&E>                                      3,898
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,350)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             11,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       4,194
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                       38
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               11,281
<SALES>                                     2,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           10,416
<CGS>                                         460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           12,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (69)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,121)
<DISCONTINUED>                              3,226
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,895)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.11)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6699

EDWARD HOWARD NORRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-01-616-AM)

Submitted: September 6, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Howard Norris, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Kathleen Beatty

Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward Howard Norris seeks to appeal the district court’s

order granting the Respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissing

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the

reasoning of the district court that Norris has not made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See

Norris v. Baskerville, No. CA-01-616-AM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 18,

2002 & entered Apr. 19, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 23


               Consent of Independent Accountants


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Old Guard Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8
(File No. 333-46175) of our reports dated February 20, 1998, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Old Guard Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.



                              COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



One South Market Square
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 30, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           48430
<SECURITIES>                                   3596883
<RECEIVABLES>                                   484099
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     233446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                797344
<PP&E>                                           31260
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1204377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           676848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       3596883
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1204377
<SALES>                                         861893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                861893
<CGS>                                           559198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   559198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 48517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               48517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  15402
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     15402
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION****OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Waung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:                 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|        |   |                                                   | Date: June 24, 2009                              |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |        |
|        |   |                                                   | By: /s/Frank Waung                               |   |   |
|        |   |           |        Frank Waung |   |   |
|        |   |                                                   | Chief Financial Officer                     |   |   |
Opinion issued July 25, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00771-CV

———————————

HEATHER HUGHES, Appellant

V.

PETER GIAMMANCO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-26459

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). The parties have agreed that each will bear his or her 

own appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). 
2

Accordingly, we grant the unopposed motion and dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (d), 43.2(f). We further vacate our May 30, 2019 

judgment. We do not withdraw our opinion issued on May 30, 2019. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(c) (“In dismissing a proceeding, the appellate court will determine 

whether to withdraw any opinion it has already issued.”). We dismiss all other 

pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Landau.
EXHIBIT 31.2

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Carroll A. Wallace, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this 10-Q Report of Exabyte Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated: May 12, 2005

| /s/ CARROLL A. WALLACE |
|------------------------|

Carroll A. Wallace

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# State Partnership Directors Share Tips on Adriatic Partnerships

/ Published Feb. 28, 2024

ATLANTIC CITY AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, N.J. - State Partnership Program directors of the state National Guards partnered with the Adriatic charter nations shared best practices during a conference hosted by the New Jersey National Guard at the National Aerospace Research and Technology Park Jan. 23-24.

The New Jersey National Guard is partnered with Albania, the Maryland Guard with Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Minnesota Guard with Croatia, the Maine Guard with Montenegro, and the Vermont Guard with North Macedonia.

“As state National Guard SPP directors, we have worked closely together for years,” said U.S. Army Lt. Col. Kevin Murphy, New Jersey SPP director. “It’s rare, though, that we can all get into the same room to share best practices and discuss how we can support each other.”

U.S. Army Maj. Patrick Enriquez, Vermont SPP director, described a Western Balkans regional cybersecurity exercise as an example of the programs’ interoperability.

“There are certainly times in a region like the Adriatic five region or the Balkans where we can pool resources, we can leverage one another’s expertise, and in many cases, create multilateral events to support strategic priorities for the combatant command,” said Enriquez.

“We’re trying to integrate our efforts for better efficiency, getting more done with less,” Murphy said. “We’re trying to get after it ourselves and do some integration before we get into the very, very big exercises.”

One of the large-scale exercises ahead includes U.S. European Command’s “DEFENDER-Europe 2025.” 

“Being able to collaborate and speak to other SPP directors that have been doing the job, getting their best practices, is very, very helpful,” said U.S. Army Maj. Elise Dent, incoming SPP director for Maryland.

Murphy said he hopes to continue the conference annually, rotating between A-5 partner states. This would include Ohio and Iowa National Guard representatives, who are partners with the A-5 observer states Serbia and Kosovo, respectively, and could not attend this year due to scheduling conflicts.

The Department of Defense State Partnership Program is managed and administered by the National Guard Bureau. It supports the security cooperation objectives of the United States and the geographic combatant commands by developing enduring relationships with partner countries and carrying out activities to build partner capacity, improve interoperability, and enhance U.S. access and influence while increasing the readiness of U.S. and partner forces. 

The program began in 1993 with 13 partners and has grown to 100 partner nations.
OVERVIEW

s฀46!฀PLANS฀TO฀ELIMINATE฀ALL฀WET฀ASH฀AND฀GYPSUM฀

storage in the TVA system and convert its 11 

operating coal-fired power plants to dry storage. 

s฀4HE฀CONVERSION฀PLAN฀WAS฀DEVELOPED฀FOLLOWING฀THE฀

$ECEMBER฀฀฀ASH฀SPILL฀AT฀+INGSTON฀&OSSIL฀0LANT

s฀4HE฀GOALS฀ARE฀TO฀INSTALL฀STATE
OF
THE
ART฀EQUIPMENT฀

to ensure safety and regulatory compliance and 

to position TVA as an industry leader in the 

management of ash and gypsum.

PROGRAM DETAILS

s฀3IX฀WET฀mY
ASH฀AND฀฀WET฀BOTTOM
ASH฀STORAGE฀

processes will be converted to dry storage.

s฀&OUR฀GYPSUM฀DEWATERING฀PROCESSES฀WILL฀BE฀INSTALLED

s฀.EW฀ASH฀DISPOSAL฀FACILITIES฀WILL฀BE฀DEVELOPED฀TO฀

handle future plant operations.

s฀%IGHTEEN฀EXISTING฀ASH฀AND฀GYPSUM฀PONDS฀WILL฀BE฀

closed and capped according to EPA guidelines.

s฀3TORAGE฀FACILITIES฀THAT฀WOULD฀BE฀CONSIDERED฀A฀

high risk in the highly unlikely event that they 

might fail will be converted first. (Independent 

evaluations have not shown any TVA storage 

facility in danger of failing.)

s฀46!฀EXPECTS฀THE฀CONVERSION฀PROGRAM฀TO฀COST฀

$1.5 to $2 billion and take eight to 10 years to 

complete.

s฀!DDITIONAL฀DISPOSAL฀FACILITIES฀WILL฀BE฀DEVELOPED฀TO฀

handle future plant operations. 

CONVERSIONS PLANNED FOR EACH TVA 

FOSSIL PLANT

Allen฀NEAR฀-EMPHIS฀4.฀฀UNITS฀฀-7	

s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Bull Run฀NEAR฀/AK฀2IDGE฀4.฀฀UNIT฀฀-7	

s฀'YPSUM฀DEWATERING

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Colbert฀NORTHWEST฀OF฀-USCLE฀3HOALS฀!,฀฀UNITS฀

1,350 MW)

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Cumberland฀NORTHWEST฀OF฀.ASHVILLE฀4.฀฀UNITS฀

2,600 MW)

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Gallatin฀NORTHEAST฀OF฀.ASHVILLE฀฀UNITS฀฀-7	

s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

John Sevier฀NEAR฀2OGERSVILLE฀4.฀฀UNITS฀฀-7	

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Johnsonville NEAR฀7AVERLY฀4.฀฀UNITS฀฀-7	

s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Kingston฀NEAR฀+INGSTON฀4.฀฀UNITS฀฀-7	

s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

s฀'YPSUM฀DEWATERING

Paradise฀NORTHWEST฀OF฀(OPKINSVILLE฀+9฀฀UNITS฀

฀-7	

s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

s฀'YPSUM฀DEWATERING

Shawnee฀NEAR฀0ADUCAH฀+9฀฀UNITS฀฀-7	

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

Widows Creek฀NEAR฀3TEVENSON฀!,฀฀UNITS฀

1,969 MW)

s฀7ET฀mY฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

s฀7ET฀BOTTOM฀ASH฀TO฀DRY฀STORAGE

s฀'YPSUM฀DEWATERING

TVA’s Conversion of Wet Ash 

and Gypsum to Dry Storage
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08186]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision for the Trunk 
Highway 41 River Crossing Tier I Final Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 16, 2015, the Minnesota Division of the FHWA signed 
the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Trunk Highway 41 River Crossing 
Tier I Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). The ROD states the 
FHWA decision to declare the modified Alternative C-2 corridor as the 
selected alternative. The selected alternative involves the 
construction of a new east-west freeway connection between US 169 and 
US 212 within the modified Alternative C-2 corridor. The selected 
alternative is the environmentally-preferred alternative.
    The Tier I FEIS was made available to the public on December 12, 
2014, through an NOA in the Federal Register (79 FR 73890) with a 
comment period that ended on January 12, 2015. See For Further 
Information Contact to request a copy of the ROD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Forst, Environmental 
Specialist, Federal Highway Administration, Minnesota Division, 380 
Jackson Street, Ste. 500, Saint Paul, MN 55101, (651) 291-6110.

    Authority:  40 CFR 1505.2

    Issued on: March 31, 2015.
David J. Scott,
Acting Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-08186 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         42,638
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,814
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    271,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               355,408
<PP&E>                                         246,523
<DEPRECIATION>                                 67,084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 560,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,515
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       391
<OTHER-SE>                                     323,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   560,844
<SALES>                                        1,066,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,066,194
<CGS>                                          639,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  365,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             83
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                61,905
<INCOME-TAX>                                   23,843
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            38,062
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   38,062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.94
        


</TABLE>
FALKOR DSLR X8 Octocopter Manual

Falkor 1 is a folding coaxial octocopter based on the Gryphon Dynamcs frame designed to fly full size DLSR camera on the Freefly Systems Movi M5 stabilizer. It is a dual operator system with a full HD downlink for the camera operator, and a on screen display data-link for the pilot based on the DJI A2 professional flight controller. Octocopters have additional payload capacity and built in redundancy for continued flight with loss of up to 2 motors, propellers, ESCs, dual battery redundancy no exposed circuitry and weather resistance electronics for increased safety.

SPECS:

Dimensions: 57 inches in X configuration Power: 8 electric motors Propellers: 18 inch Max Speed: 40mph Max takeoff weight: 35lbs Falkor Serial #: FK001 FAA N#: Not assigned Year: 2014 Max Payload : 13lbs Takeoff Configuration: Vertical Takeoff and Landing

Industry components used: Frame: Gryphon Dynamics Octocopter frame (see Appendix D for build manual). Flight controller: DJI A2 (see appendix C for operating instructions) Flight Radio: Futaba 14SGH (see appendix H for operating instructions) On Screen display and data downlink: DJI IOSD Mark 2 (See appendix F for operating instructions) Camera Gimbal: Freefly System Movi M5 (see appendix I for operating instructions) Camera control radio: Spektrum DX7 (see appendix G for operating instructions) HD Downlink:Connex by Amimon (see appendix K for operating instructions)

FALKOR Aerials, 1074 Sunshine Canyon Drive, Boulder, Colorado. falkoraerials.com 303.249.8423
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2007 JOHN PAUL TURNER, a/k/a Pops, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE BUSH, U.S. President and Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces; TIM KAINE, Virginia Governor and Commander of the Virginia Army National Guard; JOHN ROBERTS, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00526-sgw) Submitted: February 2, 2007 Decided: February 28, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. Bush , No. 7:06-cv-00526-sgw (W.D. Va. Aug. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED