alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2
                                                                     (1999 10-K)


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-1326 on Form S-3, dated February 13, 1996, related to the Dividend
Reinvestment Plan; No. 33-80847 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related to
the 1989 Executive Stock Option Plan; No. 33-80851 on Form S-8, dated December
28, 1995, related to the 1989 Directors' Stock Option Plan; No. 33-80857 on Form
S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related to the 1989 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan; No. 33-80859 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related to the 1994
Executive Stock Plan; No. 33-80861 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related
to the 1994 Directors' Stock Option Plan; and No. 33-80863 on Form S-8, dated
December 28, 1995, related to the First Northern Savings Bank, S.A. 401(k)
Savings Plan and the related Prospectuses constituting a part thereof of our
report dated January 22, 1999, with respect to the 1997 and 1998 consolidated
financial statements of First Northern Capital Corp. included in the annual
report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.




                                                      Ernst & Young LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 20, 2000
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000493

26-SEP-2013

08:56 AM
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Wayne R.
Hellman and/or Louis S. Fisi his attorney-in-fact, with the power of
substitution, for him in his capacity as director of Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc., to sign the Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year
ending on June 30, 1997, and any amendments thereto, and to file the same with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection herewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

SIGNATURE                           TITLE                    DATE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Wayne R. Hellman                Director                September 29, 1997
---------------------
Wayne R. Hellman

/s/ Louis S. Fisi                   Director                September 29, 1997
---------------------
Louis S. Fisi

/s/ Theodore A. Filson              Director                September 29, 1997
---------------------
Theodore A. Filson

/s/ Francis H. Beam                 Director                September 29, 1997
---------------------
Francis H. Beam

/s/ Susumu Harada                   Director                September 29, 1997
---------------------
 Susumu Harada

/s/ A Gordon Tunstall               Director                September 29, 1997
---------------------
A Gordon Tunstall



                                       39
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00334-CV

NOVIEMBRE DONN HILL, Appellant

V.

JIMMY WAYNE HILL, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 97th District 

Court

of Montague County (2019-0165M-CV)

October 24, 2019

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 10.31 -AOSL 3.31.2013 10Q




Exhibit 10.31


ALPHA AND OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED




AMENDED FY 2013 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN


The following is a summary of the operation of the Executive Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) established by Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (the “Company”) for Fiscal Year 2013, as amended on February 12, 2013.


Participants


Executive officers and Vice Presidents.


Performance Bonus


Participants are eligible to receive a bonus based on the level of attainment of pre-specified corporate performance goals. The Company's compensation committee establishes the performance goals to be attained. 


Performance Goals


The corporate performance goals for Fiscal Year 2013 are revenue and operating income (after bonus payout). The amount of bonus earned is based 50% on revenue achieved and 50% on the non-GAAP operating income (as determined by the management of the Company) achieved; however, a minimum of 80% of the target performance goal must be achieved for payout under that performance goal and no bonus will be paid under either performance goal if a minimum of 80% of the non-GAAP operating income target is not achieved. 


Target Bonus Awards


The Company's compensation committee establishes the bonuses payable based on the level of attainment of the corporate performance goals. The target bonuses for each named executive officer for Fiscal Year 2013 are as follows: Chief Executive Officer: 100% of base salary; Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Sales: 60% of base salary; Chief Accounting Officer: 40% of base salary. Based on level of performance attained, actual bonus payouts can range from 100% to 200% of base salary for the Chief Executive Officer; 60% to 120% of base salary for the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Sales; and 40% to 100% of base salary for the Chief Accounting Officer.


Payment of Bonus


A portion of the bonus is payable following the end of the first 6 months of Fiscal Year 2013 based on achievement of performance goals for such semi-annual period. The bonus payable based on full-year performance is then reduced by the bonus amount paid with respect to such semi-annual period. In the event that Company performance declines in the second half of the year such that no annual bonus would be payable for the fiscal year based on fiscal year performance, the participant is not required to repay any bonus payment received based on the performance for the first 6 months of the fiscal year. The participant must remain in employment with the Company through the last day of the performance periods to receive a bonus for that period.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 23, 2016

Order 

Clerk

March 23, 2016

151719(58)

DANIEL KEMP,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 151719

v COA: 319796

Wayne CC: 13-008264-NF

FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Coalition Protecting Auto NoFault to participate as amicus curiae and file an amicus brief is GRANTED. An amicus

brief will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before May 13, 2016.
Order entered October 24, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01105-CV

KATHY BRADY, Appellant

V.

ANITA KANE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-00890-B

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Robin N. Washington’s request for an extension of 

time to file the record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s record be filed no 

later than November 2, 2018.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF DOANE PET CARE COMPANY
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in connection with the accompanying annual report on Form
10-K of Doane Pet Care Company for the year ended January 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), the undersigned officer of Doane Pet
Care Company hereby certifies that: 1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of the operations of Doane Pet Care Company. Date: April 1, 2005 /s/ PHILIP K. WOODLIEFPhilip K. WoodliefVice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Doane Pet Care Company A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Doane
Pet Care Company and will be retained by Doane Pet Care Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exhibit_10-2.htm










Exhibit 10.2


 


 





 



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





 


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-l (No. 333-128028) of lturan Location and Control Ltd. of our reports dated February 17, 2010 relating to the financial statements and management reports on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Teleran Holding Ltda. February 17, 2010., included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.







 



		 





Terco Grant Thornton 


Independent Auditors 


May 20, 2010
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Educap, Inc. v. Joanna Sanchez

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 01033

- CV

Trial court case number: 980350

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

Acting for the En Banc Court

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland

, Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

A majority of the justices of the Court voted to deny the motion for en banc reconsideration.

Justice Sharp not participating.

Date: Septem ber 4, 2013
Peanuts 2022

Harvested Acres by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Acres

Not Estimated

< 3,000

3,000 - 9,999

10,000 - 14,999

15,000 - 19,999

20,000 - 29,999

30,000 +
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Scott D. Josey, certify that:     (1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Mariner Energy, Inc.;     (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. (Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986);     c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     (5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007              /s/ Scott D. Josey   Scott D. Josey,   Chairman of the Board,Chief Executive Officer and President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854221
<NAME>                        Enex Oil & Gas Income Program IV Series 3 LP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         16970
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24380
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               41350
<PP&E>                                         2880645
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2833625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 88370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          74011
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     14359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   88370
<SALES>                                        80760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               80760
<CGS>                                          49266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  49266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               29273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2221
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
NO. 12-14-00347-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JARED DAVID MCEWEN, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 114TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, Jared David McEwen, pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of a 

controlled substance. Appellant, his counsel, and counsel for the State signed an agreed 

punishment recommendation. The trial court certified that this “is a plea bargain case, and the 

defendant has NO RIGHT OF APPEAL[.]” The trial court’s certification is signed by the trial 

court, Appellant, and Appellant’s counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) limits a defendant’s right to appeal in a plea 

bargain case when he pleads guilty and his punishment does not exceed the punishment 

recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

Under those circumstances, the defendant may appeal only (1) matters raised by written motion 

and ruled on before trial or (2) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. Id. 

Here, the trial court sentenced Appellant in accordance with the agreed recommendation 

by the State. The trial court did not give Appellant permission to appeal, and granted the sole 

pretrial motion filed by Appellant. Therefore, we conclude that the trial court’s certification is 

supported by the record and Appellant has no right to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal 

“without further action.” See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Opinion delivered December 17, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 17, 2014

NO. 12-14-00347-CR

JARED DAVID MCEWEN,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 114th District Court 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114-0781-14)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3609 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3609

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the capital gain 
or loss treatment of the sale or exchange of mitigation credits earned 
                         by restoring wetlands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2009

  Mr. Melancon (for himself and Mr. Tanner) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the capital gain 
or loss treatment of the sale or exchange of mitigation credits earned 
                         by restoring wetlands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wetlands Conservation Investment Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF SALES OR EXCHANGES OF WETLAND 
              MITIGATION CREDITS AS LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAIN OR LOSS.

    (a) In General.--Part IV of subchapter P of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after section 
1257 the following new section:

``SEC. 1257A. GAINS OR LOSSES FROM SALES OR EXCHANGES OF WETLANDS 
              MITIGATION CREDITS.

    ``(a) General Rule.--Gain or loss attributable to the sale or 
exchange of a mitigation bank credit by the sponsor of the mitigation 
bank who earned such credit shall be considered the sale or exchange of 
a capital asset held for more than 1 year.
    ``(b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the terms 
`mitigation bank' and `mitigation bank credit' have the respective 
meanings given such terms by part 332 of title 33 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part IV of 
subchapter P of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 1257 the following new item:

``Sec. 1257A. Gains or losses from sales or exchanges of wetlands 
                            mitigation credits.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to sales or exchanges of mitigation banking credits 
occurring before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
First Amendment to 2009 Stock Option Agreement


EXHIBIT 4.2




FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE

HEAT BIOLOGICS, INC. 2009 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




This First Amendment fo the Heat Biologics, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is effective September 2, 2010.




WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Heat Biologics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) has adopted and the stockholders of the Company have approved the Plan; and




WHEREAS, the Board has approved this amendment of the Plan in order to allow for the early exercise of stock options granted under the Plan.




NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:




1.

The following paragraph shall be inserted as paragraph 5(g) of the Plan:




“(g)

Early Exercise of Option.  The Board may provide, in its sole discretion, that any Option may be exercisable pursuant to an early exercise provision in such Option, provided that the Shares received upon such early exercise shall be subject to a restricted stock agreement in a form acceptable to the Board. The Board may amend any previously granted Option to provide for the early exercise of such Option by inclusion of a paragraph substantially in the form of the following as a new paragraph 3(c) of the applicable stock option agreement:




3(c)

Early Exercise.  The Participant may elect to exercise this Option or any portion thereof before it is fully vested and hold such Shares subject to the provisions of a Summary of Restricted Stock Purchase, Early Exercise of Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, Early Exercise of Stock Option in substantially in the form approved pursuant to the Plan.




No Option shall be eligible for early exercise unless and until the Board specifically provides for such rights.”




2.

Except as amended herein, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.




[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]














IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies that the foregoing First Amendment of the Hear Biologics, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company.







				
	 
	HEAT BIOLOGICS, INC.

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:

	/s/ Jeffrey Wolf

	 

	 
	 
	Jeffrey Wolf, Chief Executive Officer

	 

































Heat Biologics, Inc.

First Amendment of the Heat Biologics, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan

· Signature Page ·