alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas R. Schacht, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Learning Tree International, Inc.



|                       |  |        |  |                           
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------
|Date: December 8, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/    NICHOLAS R.
SCHACHT
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Nicholas R. Schacht       
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 21, 2010 

Order 

 

September 21, 2010 

139350 (68) 

CONNIE COLAIANNI, 

Plaintiff-Appellant/ 

Cross-Appellee, 

 SC: 139350 

v COA: 282587 

 Oakland CC: 2003-051245-NO 

STUART FRANKEL DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, INC., and K-F LAND 

COMPANY, LLC IV, 

Defendants-Appellees/ 

Cross-Appellants. 

_________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Negligence Section of the State 

Bar of Michigan for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is considered, and it is 

GRANTED.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   NAME                                       JURISDICTION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  ---------------
<S>                                                                          <C>
Apex Data, Inc.............................................................  Delaware
SMART Modular Technologies (Europe) Limited................................  United Kingdom
SMART Modular Technologies (UK) Ltd........................................  United Kingdom
SMART Modular Technologies FSC, Inc........................................  Barbados
SMART Modular Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd................................  India
SMART Modular Technologies (PR), Inc.......................................  California
SMART Modular Technologies (Australia) Pty. Ltd............................  Australia
RISQ Modular Systems, Inc..................................................  California
SMART Modular Technologies (Deutschland) GmbH..............................  Germany
SMART Modular Technologies (Puerto Rico), Inc..............................  Cayman Islands
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
                         CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT

I, Michael Kelleher, President of Quantum Companies, Inc. certify that:


(1) I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-QSB of Quantum Companies,
Inc;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this periodic report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this periodic
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this periodic report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this periodic report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this periodic report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of the date within 90 days prior to filing date of this
     periodic report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)presented in this periodic report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

(6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
periodic report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 Dated: August 4, 2005      /s/ Michael Kelleher
                                              --------------------
                                                Michael Kelleher
                                                President
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY – 0210426.004.05

FROM: David Green, RTI International

DATE OF CONTACT: June 9, 2010

ORGANIZATION CONTACTED:

U. S. Coast Guard

Participants:

Tom Pellison, U. S. Coast Guard

Steve Shedd, U. S. EPA/OAQPS

Karen Schaffner, RTI, International

David Green, RTI, International

SUMMARY OF CONTACT

The purpose of the conference call was to discuss the use of submerged fill in marine 

vessel loading. Mr. Pellison stated that the Coast Guard regulations in 46 CFR 153.282 

currently require submerged fill for vessels loading flammable commodities, to prevent 

explosions. These regulations have been in force since 1966 or earlier. Loading of noncombustible materials might not be subject to this rule but since the same vessels would 

be used for combustible and non-combustible materials, the vessels would be equipped 

with submerged fill piping. In addition, these vessels are filled through the same piping 

used for unloading so the piping would have to extend close to the bottom of the tank. 

The filling lines can be up to 6 inches in radius. Mr. Pellison said that ships loading very 

heavy (non-volatile) materials (Grade E) might also be exempt from submerged fill, but 

that emissions from loading these materials would be negligible.
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Zhilin
Li,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Basic Empire  Corporation  and will be retained by Basic Empire
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                                     Date: August 5, 2008

                                                     By: /s/ Zhilin Li
                                                         -------------
                                                         Zhilin Li
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.14
                       PREVIOUS FORM OF CHANGE IN CONTROL

Louis A. Kaucic

James W. Kirkpatrick

Douglas D. Waltman
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 72 (Wednesday, April 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 20218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08554]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator or Foreign 
Utility Company Status

Old Mill Solar, L.L.C.....................  EG15-36-000
Joliet Battery Storage LLC................  EG15-38-000
West Chicago Battery Storage LLC..........  EG15-39-000
Baffin Wind LLC...........................  EG15-40-000
RE Barren Ridge 1 LLC.....................  EG15-41-000
RE Tranquillity LLC.......................  EG15-42-000
RE Roserock LLC...........................  EG15-43-000
Malaga Power, LLC.........................  EG15-44-000
Goshen Wind, LP...........................  FC15-5-000
 

    Take notice that during the month of March 2015, the status of the 
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign 
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's 
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a).

    Dated: April 8, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08554 Filed 4-14-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DALLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,708
<SECURITIES>                                    33,585
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,650
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,828
<PP&E>                                          18,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           126
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,982
<SALES>                                         40,704
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,194
<CGS>                                            7,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   977
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    148
<INCOME-TAX>                                        47
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                101
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       101
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
762 October 25, 2023 No. 561

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

In the Matter of A. O., a Youth. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent,

v. A. O., Appellant. Malheur County Circuit Court 21JU05711; A178476

Erin K. Landis, Judge. On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed September 19, 2023. Opinion filed September 13, 2023. 328 Or App 187. Christa Obold Eshleman and Youth, Rights & Justice filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and Pagan, Judge.
PER CURIAM Reconsideration allowed; former nonprecedential decision reissued as precedential opinion; reversed and remanded.Cite as 328 Or App 762 (2023) 763

PER CURIAM Youth appeals a judgment finding him within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court because he committed acts that, if he were an adult, would constitute minor in posses

sion of alcohol, a Class B violation. ORS 471.430. 1 The court found youth within its jurisdiction after applying a “pre

ponderance of the evidence” standard of proof. Although a “violation proceeding” conducted pursuant to ORS 153.076 requires that the state need only prove “the charged viola

tion by a preponderance of the evidence,” the parties agree that that is not the case in a juvenile delinquency proceed

ing. Moreover, the parties agree that the trial court plainly erred in applying the incorrect standard. We agree and accept the state’s concession. Under ORS 419C.400(2), “[t]he facts alleged in the petition showing the youth to be within the jurisdiction of the court as provided in ORS 419C.005, unless admitted, must be established beyond a reasonable doubt.” There is no provision in the juvenile code for applying a lesser standard where the act committed by the youth otherwise would be considered a violation rather than a crime. We exercise our discretion to correct the error, given the gravity of the error. Reconsideration allowed; former nonprecedential decision reissued as precedential opinion; reversed and remanded.

1 This opinion originally issued as a nonprecedential memorandum disposi

tion. State v. A. O. , 328 Or App 107 (2023) (nonprecedential memorandum opin

ion). Pursuant to ORAP 6.25(1)(f) and 10.30(1)(e), youth has requested that we reconsider the opinion solely for the purpose of changing that designation and reissuing it as a precedential opinion. We agree that this opinion should be desig

nated as precedential. Other than this footnote and the disposition of the motion being added to the tagline, this opinion is identical to the nonprecedential one that previously issued.
Order entered September 23, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01098 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 01100 - CR JOHN WESLEY PATTERSO N III, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 416 - 82554 - 05 , 416 - 82555 - 05



### O RDER The Court GRANTS appellant’s September 19, 2014 motion to extend time to file his motion for rehearing. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due by MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2014 . Any response by the State is due by MONDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2014

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to John Wesley Patterson III, TDCJ No. 1375031, Eastham Unit, 2665 Prison Road No. 1, Lovelady, Texas 75851. We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of t his order, by electronic transmission, to the Collin County District Attorney’s Office. /s/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
15681

#### BOYKIN v. CAPEHART *ET AL.*

(31 S. E. (2d), 506)

*295
      *Mr. Henry Savage,*Jrof Camden, S. C., and *Mr. C. T. Graydon,*of Columbia, S. C., Counsel for Appellant,

*296
      *Messrs. Robinson & Robinson, and Messrs.*Thomas> *Cain & Black,*all of Columbia, S. C., Counsel for Respondents

October 3, 1944.

PER CURIAM.

The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Bellinger correctly disposed of all issues involved in the case. The decree of the Circuit Court, the order refusing a new trial, and the order confirming the survey and plat of the boundary line, set forth fully the history of the litigation. We are in accord with the reasoning and conclusions of Judge Bellinger in his decree and orders, and affirm the judgment of the lower Court.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Baker and Messrs. Associate Justices Fishburne,-StukEs^ Tayeor, and Oxner concur.
|       (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|       (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:       May 20,      2008 | By:    | /s/ Seth Shaw                                                            |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   | Seth      Shaw                                                                |   |
|                                |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer (principal      executive officer) |   |
|                                |   |                                                                          |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         116,668
<SECURITIES>                                 1,227,228
<RECEIVABLES>                                  866,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,904)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          21,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,009)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,357,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           477
<OTHER-SE>                                     611,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,357,986
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               469,408
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               183,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,379
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                    66,154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             96,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.07
        

</TABLE>
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 42 44



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/13 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 13 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.50 N 76.81 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
> 
> (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
> 
> (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.

|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                            
|------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | General Partner                                                      
|       |                                                                      
|By:    | /S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________                  
|       |                                                                      
|Name:  | Kelly Tucek                                                          
|Title: | Vice President of the General Partner and                            
|       | principal financial officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.
|Date:  | August 11, 2005
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00451-CR

Warren Duray Joiner, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 81059, THE HONORABLE STEVEN J. DUSKIE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Warren Duray Joiner has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The 

motion is signed by both appellant and his attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Accordingly, 

we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Smith, and Theofanis

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 11, 2024

Do Not Publish