Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility 

Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 

Latitude: 21o

22’15” N 

Longitude: 157o

53’33” W 

HDOH Facility ID No. 9-102271 

HDOH Release ID No. 99051, 010011, 020028 

April 2010 

Prepared by: 

TEC Inc. 

1003 Bishop St. Suite 1505 

Pauahi Tower 

Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 

Prepared for: 

Commander 

Navy Region Hawaii 

Environmental Department, Code N45 

850 Ticonderoga Street, Suite 110 

Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860-5101 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

i 

Table of Contents 

Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i

Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1

1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8

1.1      Project Objective ....................................................................................................... 8

1.2      Previous Reports ....................................................................................................... 8

1.3      Background ............................................................................................................... 9

1.3.1      Site Description ............................................................................................ 9

1.3.2      Facility Information ..................................................................................... 9

1.3.3      UST Information .......................................................................................... 9

1.4      Previous Environmental Investigations .................................................................... 9

1.5      Regulatory Updates ................................................................................................. 12

1.6      RHMW05 Installation ............................................................................................. 12

2.0 Sample Collection and Analyses ....................................................................................... 13

2.1      Monitoring Well Purging ........................................................................................ 13

2.2      Groundwater Sample Collection ............................................................................. 13

2.3      Groundwater Sample Analyses ............................................................................... 14

3.0       Groundwater Sample Analytical Results ........................................................................... 14

3.1      January, February, and March 2010 Sample Analytical Results ............................ 14

3.2      Groundwater Contaminant Trend ........................................................................... 16

3.3      Results of Oil/Water Interface Measurements ........................................................ 18

3.4      Groundwater Status ................................................................................................. 19

4.0 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................ 23

5.0 References .......................................................................................................................... 27

List of Tables 

Table 1 Analytical Results for Quarterly Groundwater Sampling Release Response Report ..15 

Table 2 Oil/Water Interface Measurements ..............................................................................19 

Table 3 Action Levels for Compounds of Concern ..................................................................20 

Table 4 Results Categories and Responses to Groundwater Monitoring Results .....................20 

List of Figures 

Figure 1 TPH Trends in Groundwater, Round 18 (Jan. 26/27, Feb. 23, and March 30, 2010) ..25 

Figure 2 PAH Trends in Groundwater, Round 18 (Jan. 26/27, Feb. 23, and March 30, 2010) .26 

List of Appendices 

Appendix A – Laboratory Analytical Reports 

Appendix B – January, February, and March 2010 TPH-DRO Results Memorandum 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

1 

Executive Summary 

This quarterly groundwater monitoring report presents the results of groundwater sampling 

conducted on January 26 and 27, 2010 and resample events at RHMW02 on February 23, 2010 

and again on March 30, 2010 at the United States (US) Navy Bulk Fuel Storage Facility at Red 

Hill, Oahu, Hawaii (the Facility). The sampling and reporting was conducted by TEC Inc. (TEC) 

for the Fleet and Industrial Supply Center (FISC) at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. This report is part of 

a series of quarterly groundwater monitoring reports provided by the US Navy to the State of 

Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) in accordance with HDOH’s release response 

requirements. Currently, there are 18 active and 2 inactive, 12.5 million gallon, field-constructed 

underground storage tanks (USTs) located at the Facility. 

Background 

In 2002, the US Navy installed a groundwater monitoring well (currently named RHMW01) into 

the basal aquifer, directly located between RHMW02 and US Navy Well 2254-01, within the 

lower access tunnel. Groundwater samples from this well indicated that petroleum from the 

Facility has migrated to the basal aquifer (AMEC, 2002). In 2005, the US Navy began quarterly 

monitoring of the aquifer to protect their drinking water resource associated with the US Navy 

Well 2254-01. US Navy Well 2254-01 is located approximately 3,000 feet down-gradient from 

the Facility USTs and provides approximately 24% of the potable water to the Pearl Harbor 

Water System (PHWS). 

By September 2005, the US Navy had installed two more groundwater monitoring wells 

(RHMW02 and RHMW03) within the Facility UST system, a background groundwater 

monitoring well (RHMW04) located north of UST tank 20 and adjacent to the US Navy Firing 

Range, and a groundwater monitoring well within the US Navy Well 2254-01 infiltration gallery 

(RHMW2254-01). 

All five wells were sampled twice as part of a comprehensive environmental investigation and 

risk assessment (TEC, 2006). For this investigation, groundwater samples were analyzed for 

petroleum constituents and compared against HDOH Drinking Water Environmental Action 

Levels (EALs) (HDOH, July 2005). In addition, a three-dimensional (3-D) groundwater model 

was developed to produce site-specific risk-based levels (SSRBLs) for compounds of concern. 

The results of this modeling effort indicated that Jet Propulsion (JP)–5 fuel presented the biggest 

risk to the US Navy water supply, due to its mobility and toxicity. Finally, the model 

determined that a non-aqueous plume (free product) of JP-5 would need to migrate to within 

1,100 feet of the US Navy Well 2254-01 infiltration gallery for HDOH EALs to be exceeded 

within the gallery. Based on this, free-product must be observed in RHMW01 for EALs to be 

exceeded at the US Navy Well 2254-01. 

In April 2009, another groundwater monitoring well (RHMW05) was installed within the lower 

access tunnel between RHMW01 and US Navy Well 2254-01. It was installed to identify the 

extent of contaminant migration before it reaches US Navy Well 2254-01 (see Figure 1). 

 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

2 

During the summer and fall of 2008, HDOH updated their EALs, which resulted in significant 

changes to the action levels associated with methylnaphthalenes. The HDOH Drinking Water 

toxicity EAL for these compounds was 240 micrograms per liter (g/L). This concentration 

assumed that methylnaphthalenes were not human carcinogens. Once evidence emerged and 

was accepted by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) that methylnaphthalenes 

are carcinogenic to humans, HDOH adopted more rigorous EALs of 4.7 g/L for 1-

methylnaphthalene and 24 g/L for 2-methylnaphthalene (HDOH, 2008). 

The HDOH Drinking Water EAL for naphthalene was also updated during this process. 

Previously, HDOH based their naphthalene EAL on USEPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation 

Goal (USEPA PRG) of 6.2 g/L, which is associated with a non-cancer Hazard Index of 1. In 

deference to the California Department of Public Health’s Drinking Water Notification Levels, 

(HDOH, 2008) HDOH updated their naphthalene drinking water EAL to 17 g/L. 

Finally, the HDOH Drinking Water EAL for TPH-DRO was increased from 100 g/L to 210 

g/L, although the Groundwater Gross Contamination EAL for TPH-DRO remains 100 g/L. 

Groundwater Protection Plan 

In 2008, the US Navy completed the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Final Groundwater 

Protection Plan (TEC, 2008), which specified SSRBLs and various required actions based on the 

category status (i.e., categories 1 through 4) of each groundwater monitoring well. In 2009, the 

Plan was revised to account for ongoing changes, such as the installation of monitoring well 

RHMW05. The main objective of the Plan is to protect the groundwater quality of US Navy 

Well 2254-01, which provides potable water to the PHWS. This is accomplished by comparing 

petroleum concentrations in the Facility wells to established SSRBLs and taking appropriate 

action. A secondary, but important objective of the Plan is to identify leaking USTs by 

evaluating increasing concentration trends, or the presence of free product in one or more 

groundwater monitoring wells. This quarterly report compares observed water quality to these 

established categories and associated actions. 

Current Results 

On January 26 through 27, 2010, five groundwater samples (i.e., RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05 and RHMW2254-01), along with the required quality control samples 

(duplicate, matrix spike, spike duplicate, and trip blank) were collected for analysis. Samples 

were analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) quantified as Diesel-Range Organics 

(DRO) and Gasoline Range Organics (GRO), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Polynuclear 

Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), and dissolved lead. Due to elevated concentrations of TPHDRO at RHMW02, additional samples were collected on February 23, 2010 and March 30, 2010 

and analyzed for TPH-DRO. 

TPH-DRO

TPH-DRO was detected at 312 (μg/L) in RHMW01, 2,770 μg/L (i.e., the average of normal and 

duplicate samples) in RHMW02, and at 2,060 μg/L in RHMW05. TPH-DRO was not detected 

above the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) in RHMW03 and RHMW2254-01. The 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

3 

HDOH Drinking Water EAL and SSRBL for TPH-DRO are 210 μg/L and 4,500 μg/L, 

respectively. 

TPH-GRO

For TPH-GRO the HDOH Drinking Water EAL is 100 μg/L. In samples RHMW01, RHMW03, 

RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01 TPH-GRO was not observed above the laboratory MDL (i.e., 30 

μg/L). In the regular and duplicate samples from RHMW02, TPH-GRO was detected at an 

average of 40.2F μg/L [F indicates that the compound was identified, but the concentration was 

above the MDL and below the reporting limit (RL), therefore is considered an estimate]. 

Other Parameters above HDOH Drinking Water EALs

In RHMW02, the average concentrations between the normal and duplicate sample of 

naphthalene and 1-methylnaphthalene were 20.4 μg/L and 8.65 μg/L, respectively. This is above 

the HDOH Drinking Water EALs of 17 μg/L for naphthalene, and 4.7 μg/L for 1-

methylnaphthalene. 

Trend Analysis 

The following is a discussion of compounds that exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs during 

two or more recent consecutive sampling events, thus establishing a trend: 

 

RHMW01

At RHMW01, concentrations of TPH-DRO have been greater than the HDOH Drinking Water 

EAL since September 2005, but less than 25 percent of the SSRBL of 4,500 g/L. TPH-DRO 

had exhibited a decreasing trend since October 2008 with the lowest concentration (i.e., 248 

μg/L) recorded in July 2009. Since July 2009, this trend began increasing with 299F μg/L and 

312F μg/L detected in October 2009 and January 2010, respectively. 

RHMW02

From September 2005 through February 2009, TPH-DRO exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water 

EAL and was greater than 50 percent of the SSRBL (estimated solubility limit of 4,500 g/L). 

However, there has been a decreasing trend since the SSRBL was exceeded in October 2008 to 

below 50 percent of the SSRBL in May and July 2009. However, since increasing above 50 

percent of the SSRBL in October 2009, TPH-DRO continued exhibiting an increasing trend 

through January 2010. In January 2010, TPH-DRO increased to an average of 2,770 μg/L. This 

prompted resample events in February 2010 when TPH-DRO increased to an average of 7,780 

μg/L, above the SSRBL and again in March 2010 when TPH-DRO averaged 2,490 μg/L. It is 

important to note that in January and February 2010 tentatively identified compounds (TICs) 

apparently not associated with petroleum from the Facility were detected at significant 

concentrations in RHMW02. However, TICs were not observed at significant concentrations for 

the March 2010 sampling event. After subtracting the TICs from the January and February 2010 

results, TPH-DRO was detected at an average of 1,925 μg/L and 3,200 μg/L, respectively (see 

Appendix B). 

For other parameters, 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene have almost consistently 

averaged concentrations above HDOH Drinking Water EALs (i.e., 4.7 g/L and 24 g/L, 

respectively) since September 2005. However, a significantly decreasing trend since October 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

4 

2008 has since brought these concentrations below the HDOH Drinking Water EALs. In January 

2010, 1-methylnaphthalene increased above the HDOH Drinking Water EAL to an average 

concentration of 8.645 μg/L, after decreasing to the lowest concentration of any round in 

October 2009 (i.e., 3.245 g/L). In January 2010, although not exceeding the HDOH Drinking 

Water EAL, 2-methylnaphthalene increased to an average concentration of 3.25 g/L after 

decreasing in October 2009. Naphthalene has exhibited a historical trend similar to 2-

methylnaphthalene at RHMW02. However, in October 2009 and January 2010, naphthalene 

increased to an averaged 21.65 g/L and 20.4 g/L, respectively, greater than the HDOH 

Drinking Water EAL of 17 g/L. 

RHMW03

At RHMW03, historically, concentrations of TPH-DRO have fluctuated around the HDOH 

Drinking Water EAL, but have been significantly lower than corresponding values observed at 

RHMW01 and RHMW02. However, during the last four sampling events (i.e., May 2009, July 

2009, October 2009, and January 2010), TPH-DRO was not detected above the laboratory MDL. 

These results represent a continuing decreasing trend for TPH-DRO that has existed since 

October 2008. 

RHMW05

At RHMW05 there is an increasing trend for TPH-DRO. The January 2010 concentration was 

2,060 μg/L, a significant increase as compared with the October 2009 concentration of 673 μg/L. 

The January 2010 concentration is greater than the HDOH EAL, but less than 50 percent of the 

SSRBL for TPH-DRO. However, as with RHMW02, TICs apparently not associated with 

petroleum from the Facility were detected at significant concentrations in RHMW05. After 

subtracting the TICs from the January 2010 results, TPH-DRO was estimated at a concentration 

of 541 μg/L (see Appendix B). 

US Navy Well 2254-01

At RHMW2254-01, no compounds have been detected above the laboratory MDLs since trace 

concentrations of TPH-GRO and 2-methylnaphthalene were observed in the February and May 

2009 events. However, in January 2010 naphthalene was detected at 0.0375F μg/L via EPA 

Method 8270C SIM, just above the laboratory MDL (i.e., 0.0326 μg/L) and below the HDOH 

EAL (i.e., 17 μg/L). 

Current Groundwater Status 

To date, there is no observation of a trend (i.e., two or more consecutive events) of light-non 

aqueous phased liquids (LNAPL), otherwise known as free product, on groundwater in any of 

the Facility monitoring wells. 

US Navy Well 2254-01

Although a trace concentration of naphthalene was detected at RHMW2254-01 during the 

January 2010 sampling event, it does not place the well into the Category 1 status. Because no 

contamination trend (i.e., two or more consecutive events of detectable concentrations) has been 

established, RHMW2254-01 located at US Navy Well 2254-01, does not meet the Category 1 

definition. 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

5 

RHMW03

Based upon the January 2010 sampling event, RHMW03 is not eligible for any category status 

change since no compounds were detected above the laboratory MDLs. 

Category 1 Status Locations

There are no Category 1 status locations based upon the January 2010 event. 

Category 2 Status Locations

RHMW01 

The January 2010 sampling event indicates that RHMW01 should remain in Category 2 status. 

This is because the TPH-DRO concentration increased to 312F g/L and is greater than the 

HDOH Drinking Water EAL (210 g/L), but less than half the SSRBL of 4,500 g/L (estimated 

solubility limit of JP-5). 

RHMW05

Based upon the January 2010 sampling event, RHMW05 should remain in a Category 2 status. 

TPH-DRO in RHMW05 (i.e., 2,060 μg/L) is above the drinking water EAL of 210 μg/L and has 

been showing an increasing trend over the last four rounds. However, TICs apparently not 

associated with petroleum from the Facility were detected at significant concentrations in 

RHMW05. After subtracting the TICs, TPH-DRO was estimated at a concentration of 541 μg/L 

(see Appendix B). 

 

Category 2 for RHMW01 and RHMW05 requires: 

1. Quarterly reports to be sent to HDOH; and 

2. Initiation of a leak determination program to identify if tanks are leaking. 

Category 3 Status Locations

RHMW02 

Results from the January 2010 sampling event and the resample events in February and March 

2010 indicate that RHMW02 is in Category 3 status. This is because TPH-DRO, after 

subtracting the TICs apparently not associated with petroleum from the Facility, is greater than 

the HDOH Drinking Water EAL (210 g/L), and is between one half and the established SSRBL 

value of 4,500 g/L (estimated solubility limit of JP-5). Specifically, the maximum observed 

TPH-DRO concentration among the January 2010 and February 2010 sampling efforts occurred 

during the re-sampling of RHMW02 on Feburary 23, 2010 with concentrations of 3,470 g/L 

and 2,930 g/L (duplicate). These concentrations were corrected by removing apparently nonfuel related compounds from the TPH-DRO total concentration (see Appendix B). The March 

2010 re-sampling results did not contain large concentrations of apparently non-fuel related TIC 

compounds. The March 2010 TPH-DRO concentrations of 2,630 g/L and 2,350 g/L 

(duplicate) provide an average TPH-DRO concentration 2,490 g/L (Appendix B). 

In addition, the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 17 g/L for naphthalene was exceeded in 

January 2010 [i.e., 20.4 g/L (the average of normal and duplicate samples)]. 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

6 

Category 3 response at RHMW02 requires: 

1. Send quarterly reports to HDOH; 

2. Initiation of a leak determination program to identify if tanks are leaking; 

3. Increase free product monitoring frequency to once per month (if concentrations 

increasing); 

4. Notify HDOH verbally within 7 days and follow with written notification in 30 days; 

5. Remove sampling pumps, measure product in pertinent wells with interface probe, reinstall pumps if product is not detected; and 

6. Immediately evaluate tanks for leaks. 

 

Category 4 Status Locations

There are no Category 4 status locations. 

Conclusions and Recommendations 

There is no indication of an immediate threat of disruption to drinking water resources of the US 

Navy Well 2254-01 as a result of the January and February 2010 data. However, a trace 

concentration of naphthalene was detected just above the laboratory MDL, but significantly less 

than the HDOH drinking water EAL at RHMW2254-01. The increasing TPH-DRO 

concentrations at RHMW05 are of significant concern. This well is less than 700 feet from the 

east end of the US Navy Well 2254-01 infiltration gallery. The TPH-DRO concentration in this 

well was nearly 50 percent of the SSRBL prior to a re-quantification that adjusted the 

concentration by removing apparently non-fuel related TIC compounds from the TPH-DRO total 

concentration (Appendix B). If the total TPH-DRO concentration at RHMW05 had been from 

fuel-related compounds, there could be a high probability of contamination at some point 

entering the infiltration gallery. It is recommended that future quarterly analytical results be 

closely assessed at RHMW05, since its non-TIC adjusted concentrations exhibit an increasing 

contaminant trend for TPH-DRO (i.e., 200 μg/L in May 2009, 491μg/L in July 2009, 673 μg/L 

in October 2009, and 2,060 μg/L in January 2010). In addition, consideration should be given to 

performing a more detailed analytical assessment of the contamination found in this well (and 

other wells) such as having future samples analyzed using the Massachusetts Department of 

Environmental Protection (MADEP) analytical methods in addition to TPH-GRO and TPH-DRO 

analytical methods. 

With the exception of RHMW03 and RHMW2254-01, compound concentrations for all the other 

monitoring wells (i.e., RHMW01, RHMW02, and RHMW05) are exhibiting increasing 

contaminant trends for TPH-DRO relative to the concentrations observed in October 2009. 

Current results from RHMW01 are still at concentration levels within the historical range. 

However, results from RHMW02 and RHMW05 have been exhibiting significant increases (i.e., 

for the non-TIC adjusted concentrations). After a thorough analysis of the analytical results from 

RHMW02 and RHMW05, TICs apparently not attributed to petroleum from the Facility 

contributed to a significant increase of TPH-DRO during January and February 2010 (see 

Appendix B). After subtracting these TICs, the estimated TPH-DRO concentrations in 

RHMW02 and RHMW05 remain within the historical range. 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

7 

Quarterly groundwater sampling for TPH-DRO, TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, and dissolved lead 

should continue at the Facility until such time that data indicates that a different monitoring plan 

is warranted. 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

8 

1.0 Introduction

This report presents the results of the 18th groundwater sampling event, conducted in January 

2010 and resample events at RHMW02 in February and March 2010 at the Red Hill Fuel Storage 

Facility, Oahu, Hawaii (hereafter referred to as “the Facility”). The Facility consists of 18 active 

and two inactive underground storage tanks (USTs) operated by the Fleet and Industrial Supply 

Center (FISC), Pearl Harbor. The groundwater sampling and analysis event is part of a 

groundwater monitoring program for the UST site in response to past UST releases, previous 

environmental investigations, and recommendations from the State of Hawaii Department of 

Health (HDOH). 

1.1 Project Objective 

This groundwater sampling project was performed to evaluate the presence of chemicals of 

potential concern in groundwater underlying the Facility. The project was conducted to ensure 

the Navy remains in compliance with HDOH UST release response requirements as described in 

Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) 11-281 Subchapter 7, Release Response Action. The 

groundwater sampling program followed the procedures described in Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage 

Facility Groundwater Protection Plan [TEC Inc. (TEC), 2008 updated in 2009], also referred to 

as “the Plan”. 

This groundwater sampling event was conducted by TEC under United States (US) Navy 

Contract Number N47408-04-D-8514, Task Order No. 54. 

1.2 Previous Reports 

The following groundwater monitoring reports were previously submitted to the HDOH: 

1. Groundwater Sampling Report, First Quarter 2005 (submitted April 2005); 

2. Groundwater Sampling Report, Second Quarter 2005 (submitted August 2005); 

3. Groundwater Sampling Report, Third Quarter 2005 (submitted November 2005); 

4. Groundwater Sampling Report, Fourth Quarter 2005 (submitted February 2006); 

5. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2006 (submitted September 2006); 

6. Groundwater Monitoring Results, December 2006 (submitted January 2007); 

7. Groundwater Monitoring Results, March 2007 (submitted May 2007); 

8. Groundwater Monitoring Results, June 2007 (submitted August 2007); 

9. Groundwater Monitoring Results, September 2007 (submitted October 2007); 

10. Groundwater Monitoring Results, January 2008 (submitted March 2008); 

11. Groundwater Monitoring Results, April 2008 (submitted May 2008); 

12. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2008 (submitted October 2008); 

13. Groundwater Monitoring Results, October and December 2008 (submitted February 

2009); 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

9 

14. Groundwater Monitoring Results, February 2009 (submitted May 2009); 

15. Groundwater Monitoring Results, May 2009 (submitted July 2009); 

16. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2009 (submitted September 2009); and 

17. Groundwater Monitoring Results, October 2009 (submitted December 2009). 

1.3 Background 

The following sections provide a description of the site and information on the Facility and USTs. 

1.3.1 Site Description 

The Facility is located in Red Hill, Oahu, Hawaii. Land adjacent to the north of the Facility is 

occupied by Halawa Correctional Facility and private businesses. Land to the south and west of 

the Facility includes the Coast Guard Reservation. Moanalua Valley is located east of the 

Facility (Dawson, 2006). 

The Navy Public Works Department operates a potable water infiltration tunnel approximately 

1,550 feet hydraulically down-gradient from the Facility (Dawson, 2006). The US Navy Well 

2254-01 is located approximately 3,000 feet down-gradient (west) of the Facility and provides 

approximately 24% of the potable water to the Pearl Harbor Water System (PHWS), which 

serves approximately 52,200 military consumers (TEC, 2008). 

1.3.2 Facility Information 

The Facility consists of 18 active and two inactive USTs operated by Navy FISC Pearl Harbor. 

Each UST has a capacity of 12.5 million gallons. The bottom of the USTs is located 

approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer (Dawson, 2006). 

1.3.3 UST Information 

The USTs were constructed in the early 1940s. The tanks were fabricated from steel and 

currently contain Jet Propulsion (JP)–5 fuel, JP-8, and F-76 (diesel marine fuel). Previously, 

several tanks stored Navy Special Fuel Oil, Navy Distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor 

gasoline. Each tank measures approximately 245 feet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The 

upper domes of the tanks lie at depths varying between approximately 100 feet and 200 feet 

below the existing ground surface (TEC, 2006). 

1.4 Previous Environmental Investigations 

1998 to 2001: From 1998 to 2001, the Navy conducted an investigation at the Facility to assess 

potential releases from the fuel storage USTs and piping systems. In February 2001, the Navy 

installed a one-inch diameter RHMW01 (previously known as MW-V1D) to monitor for 

contamination of the basal aquifer underlying the Facility. The well was installed and completed 

at approximately 100 feet below grade within the lower access tunnel. At the time of well 

completion, depth to water in RHMW01 was measured at 86 feet below grade (Dawson, 2006). 

In February 2001, groundwater samples collected from RHMW01 contained total petroleum 

hydrocarbons (TPH) concentrations ranging from 883 micrograms per liter (g/L) to 1,050 g/L 

and total lead ranging from 10.4 g/L to 15 g/L. The maximum total lead concentration in the 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

10 

samples was equal to the primary drinking water standard of 15 g/L for lead and exceeded the 

HDOH Tier 1 groundwater action level of 5.6 g/L (Dawson, 2006). 

2005 – Groundwater Sampling: The Navy began quarterly groundwater sampling at existing 

monitoring wells in 2005. Dawson Group, Inc. collected groundwater samples from RHMW01 

and the Red Hill Navy Pump Station (US Navy Well 2254-01) in February, June, September, and 

December 2005. 

Samples collected in February and June 2005 were not filtered in the field prior to analysis for 

lead. Analytical results for samples collected from RHMW01 indicated concentrations of total 

lead were above the HDOH Tier 1 action level of 5.6 g/L. The results were not considered 

appropriate for risk assessment since the sample had not been filtered. In addition, lead was not 

a component of fuels from the tanks near RHMW01. Lead may have been part of the Facility 

construction material (TEC, 2007). Previous sampling efforts showed elevated lead when 

analyzed as unfiltered samples. Subsequent efforts where the lead samples were filtered has 

resolved this issue. 

Samples were filtered in September and December 2005, and dissolved lead concentrations were 

below the HDOH Tier 1 action level. Concentrations of all other contaminants of potential 

concern were below HDOH Tier 1 action levels. 

2005 – Site Investigation: As part of a site investigation, TEC installed three groundwater 

monitoring wells at the Facility between June and September 2005. Well RHMW02 was 

installed in the lower access tunnel near Tanks 5 and 6. Well RHMW03 was installed in the 

lower access tunnel near Tanks 13 and 14. Well RHMW04 was installed north of UST tank 20 

to provide geochemistry for water moving through the basal aquifer beneath the Facility. Wells 

RHMW02 and RHMW03 were completed to depths of approximately 125 feet below the tunnel 

floor, and well RHMW04 was completed to a depth of approximately 300 feet below ground 

surface outside the tunnel. Groundwater samples were collected from the three newly installed 

wells and two existing wells (RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01) in September 2005. 

Naphthalene and trichloroethylene were detected in samples collected from RHMW02 at 

concentrations greater than the HDOH Tier 1 action levels. Lead was detected in the sample 

collected from RHMW01 at a concentration greater than the HDOH Tier 1 action level; 

however, the sample was not filtered in the field prior to analysis. Analytical results for filtered 

samples obtained by Dawson during the same period indicated concentrations of dissolved lead 

were below the HDOH Tier 1 action level. 

2006 – Site Investigation: Dedicated sampling pumps were installed in five wells (RHMW01, 

RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW04, and US Navy Well 2254-01). TEC collected groundwater 

samples from the wells in July 2006. The groundwater samples were analyzed for petroleum 

constituents. Naphthalene was detected in samples collected from RHMW02 at concentrations 

above the HDOH Tier 1 action level. 

In September 2005, with concurrence from the HDOH, the Navy decided to use the newer 

HDOH Environmental Action Levels (EALs) for the Red Hill Site Investigation and Risk 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

11 

Assessment project. The EALs provide action levels for more chemicals, and are more useful 

for conducting screening risk assessments. Since the HDOH (HDOH May 2005) Policy Letter 

stated that the two sets of action levels should not be mixed, the Tier 1 screening levels presented 

in HAR Section 11-281-78 would no longer be used to evaluate environmental impact at the 

Facility. 

2006 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected in December 2006. 

Analytical results indicated the following: 

 No chemicals were detected in groundwater from US Navy Well 2254-01 or RHMW03; 

 TPH as diesel range organics (TPH-DRO) was detected in groundwater above the HDOH 

Drinking Water EALs in RHMW01; and 

 TPH as gasoline range organics (TPH-GRO), TPH-DRO, and naphthalene were detected 

in groundwater above the HDOH Drinking Water EALs in RHMW02. 

2007 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected in March, June, and 

September 2007. Analytical results indicated the following: 

 No chemicals were detected above HDOH Drinking Water EALs at US Navy Well 

2254-01; 

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01 during all three 

sampling events; 

 TPH-GRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 in March; 

 TPH-DRO and naphthalene exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 during 

all three sampling events; 

 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene exceeded the HDOH Groundwater Gross 

Contamination EAL at RHMW02 during all three sampling events; and 

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW03 in June. 

2008 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected in January, April, July, 

and October 2008. Analytical results indicated the following: 

 No chemicals were detected above HDOH Drinking Water EALs at US Navy Well 

2254-01; 

 Trace detections of 1-methylnaphthalene and naphthalene prompted a resample event in 

December at US Navy Well 2254-01, no chemicals were detected above the MDL; 

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01 during all four sampling 

events; 

 TPH-GRO did not exceed HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02; 

 TPH-DRO, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene exceeded 

HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02. Additionally, the SSRBL of 4,500 g/L for 

TPH-DRO was exceed in the October sampling event; and 

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW03 during all four sampling 

events. 

2009 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected in February, May, July, 

and October 2009. Analytical results indicated the following: 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

12 

 No chemicals have been detected above HDOH Drinking Water EALs at US Navy Well 

2254-01; 

 Trace TPH-GRO at US Navy Well 2254-01 was detected above the laboratory MDL and 

significantly below the laboratory reporting limit and HDOH EAL, in February and May 

2009; 

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01 during all four sampling 

events; 

 TPH-GRO has not exceed HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02; 

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 during all four sampling 

events; 

 Naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene exceeded HDOH Drinking 

Water EALs at RHMW02 in February 2009, however only 1-methylnaphthalene 

exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EALs in May and July 2009 and only naphthalene 

exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL in October 2009; 

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW03 in February, but not in 

May, July, or October; and 

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EAL at RHMW05 during the July and 

October 2009 sampling events. 

1.5 Regulatory Updates 

During the summer and fall of 2008, HDOH updated their EALs, which resulted in significant 

changes to the action levels associated with methylnaphthalenes. The drinking water toxicity 

EAL for these compounds was 240 g/L. This concentration presumed that methylnaphthalenes 

were non-carcinogenic. Evidence that they are human carcinogens has now been accepted by the 

US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). As a result, HDOH adopted more rigorous 

EALs of 4.7 g/L for 1-methylnaphthalene and 24 g/L for 2-methylnaphthalene, corresponding 

to a residential tap water scenario, and a 1 in a million cancer risk (HDOH, 2008). 

The drinking water EAL for naphthalene has also been updated during this process. Previously, 

HDOH based their naphthalene EAL on USEPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goal 

(USEPA PRG) of 6.2 g/L, which is associated with a non-cancer Hazard index (HI) of 1. The 

US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) generally considers a Hazard quotient (HQ) of 

1.0 or less to be acceptable. For multiple chemicals or fractions at an exposure point (e.g. for a 

monitoring well) a HI is calculated by summing the HQs. HDOH has updated their naphthalene 

drinking water EAL to 17 g/L, in deference to the California Department of Public Health’s 

Drinking Water Notification Levels, a Hazard Index of 2.7 (HDOH, 2008). 

Finally, the HDOH Drinking Water EAL for TPH-DRO was increased from 100 g/L to 210 

g/L, although the HDOH Groundwater Gross Contamination EAL for TPH-DRO remains 100 

g/L. 

1.6 RHMW05 Installation 

In April 2009, a new groundwater monitoring well, RHMW05, was installed by TEC under US 

Navy Contract Number N47408-04-D-8514, Task Order No. 54. RHMW05 is located within the 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

13 

lower access tunnel between RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01(located at the US Navy Well 2254-

01). It was installed to identify the extent of contaminant migration prior to contaminants 

reaching the infiltration gallery at the US Navy Well 2254-01. 

2.0 Sample Collection and Analyses 

Field activities relating to groundwater sample collection were conducted on January 26 and 27, 

2010. Groundwater samples were collected from four monitoring wells located inside the 

Facility lower access tunnel and one monitoring well located at the Red Hill Navy Pump Station. 

Sampling and analysis were conducted according to Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2009). A total of eight samples were collected as follows: 

 one environmental sample from RHMW2254-01 (i.e., located at the US Navy Well 

2254-01), RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05; 

 one duplicate sample from RHMW02 (sampled as RHMWA01 and reported as 

RHMW02D); and 

 one matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate from RHMW2254-01. 

Due to elevated TPH-DRO concentrations in RHMW02, additional samples were collected on 

February 23, 2010 and March 30, 2010. During February and March, two samples were 

collected for TPH-DRO as follows: 

 one environmental sample from RHMW02; and 

 one duplicate sample from RHMW02 (sampled as RHMWA01 and reported as 

RHMW02D). 

2.1 Monitoring Well Purging

All monitoring wells were purged prior to sampling. Well purging was considered complete 

when no less than three successive water quality parameter measurements had stabilized within 

approximately 10 percent. Field parameters were measured at regular intervals during well 

purging and included pH, temperature, specific conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity. 

During the February 2010 resample of RHMW02, the field parameters measured were limited to 

pH and turbidity as a result of a faulty water quality analyzer. Well purging was considered 

complete when greater than three well volumes had been purged. Purge water was collected and 

disposed in the Facility oil/water separator system. 

2.2 Groundwater Sample Collection 

Each monitoring well was sampled immediately following purging. All wells were sampled 

directly from their dedicated bladder pump system, except for RHMW02 and RHMW05. 

RHMW02 and RHMW05 were sampled using disposable bailers. Samples were placed into 

sampling containers with appropriate preservatives [i.e., hydrochloric acid (HCl) for volatile 

organic analysis, nitric acid (HNO3) for dissolved lead]. Dissolved lead samples were filtered in 

the field and placed in preserved bottles. Sample containers were labeled with the date, sample 

identification number, type of analysis, and sampler’s name. The containers were placed on ice 

in sample coolers and transported under chain-of-custody procedures to the certified laboratory 

for analysis. 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

14 

2.3 Groundwater Sample Analyses 

Groundwater samples were analyzed by SGS Environmental Service, Inc. in Anchorage, Alaska 

for TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO by EPA Method 8015B, VOCs by EPA Method 8260B, PAHs by 

EPA Method 8270C SIM, and dissolved lead by EPA Method 6020. 

3.0 Groundwater Sample Analytical Results 

This section provides a summary of analytical results for groundwater samples collected from 

four monitoring wells located in the lower access tunnel of the Facility and one monitoring well 

located at the Red Hill Navy Pump Station. Duplicate sample results from monitoring well 

RHMW02 are reported in this document as RHMW02D. A summary of groundwater analytical 

results for TPH-DRO, TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, and dissolved lead is included in Table 1. 

Complete analytical laboratory reports are provided in Appendix A. 

3.1 January, February, and March 2010 Sample Analytical Results 

Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH-DRO, TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, and dissolved 

lead, with the exception of the February and March 2010 re-sampling efforts at RHMW02 where 

only TPH-DRO was analyzed. The results for each groundwater monitoring well are discussed 

below. 

RHMW01

TPH-DRO at 312F μg/L exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EALs of 210 μg/L. 

Concentrations of 2-methylnaphthalene, acenaphthene, flourene, naphthalene, and phenanthrene 

were detected at 0.0559 μg/L, 0.0372F μg/L, 0.0384F μg/L, 0.33 μg/L, and 0.0204F μg/L, 

respectfully (Table 1). All of these concentrations are below the HDOH EALs for each 

constituent. No other constituents were detected above the laboratory MDL. 

RHMW02

TPH-DRO, TPH-GRO, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, acenaphthene, fluoranthene, 

flourene, and naphthalene were detected in RHMW02. In January 2010, TPH-DRO was 

detected at RHMW02 in the normal and duplicate samples at 2,130 μg/L and 3,410 μg/L, 

respectively. During the resample event in February 2010, TPH-DRO was detected in the 

normal and duplicate samples at 8,650 μg/L and 6,910 μg/L, respectively. These results 

exceeded the HDOH EAL of 210 μg/L, and the site-specific risk based level (SSRBL) of 4,500 

μg/L. However, after a thorough analysis of the analytical data, tentatively identified 

compounds (TICs) that are apparently not attributed to fuel from the Facility were contributing to 

elevated TPH-DRO concentrations. Adjusted concentrations (i.e., not including increases from 

TICs) for TPH-DRO are estimated at 1,740 μg/L and 2,110 μg/L, from the normal and duplicate 

samples from January 2010, respectively; and 3,470 μg/L and 2,930 μg/L, from the normal and 

duplicate samples from February 2010, respectively (see Appendix B). The March 2010 resampling results did not contain large concentrations of apparently non-fuel related TIC 

compounds. The March 2010 TPH-DRO concentrations of 2,630 g/L and 2,350 g/L 

(duplicate) provide an average TPH-DRO concentration of 2,490 g/L (Appendix B). 
Page 1 of 1

Table 1. Analytical Results for Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Release Response Report (January 26 - 27, February 23, and March 31, 2010)

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii

Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL

TPH as DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS 210 100 312 F 165 440 2130 161 430 3410 169 449 ND U 165 440 2060 169 449 ND U 160 426 8650 165 440 6910 163 435 2630 172 460 2350 167 444

TPH as GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS 100 100 ND U 30 100 42.3 F 30 100 38.1 F 30 100 ND U 30 100 ND U 30 100 ND U 30 100 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 4.7 10 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 9.03 0.165 0.549 8.26 0.17 0.568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 0.0207 F 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 24 10 0.0559 0.0167 0.0556 3.85 0.165 0.549 2.65 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 0.0246 F 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

ACENAPHTHENE 370 20 0.0372 F 0.0167 0.0556 0.247 0.0165 0.0549 0.231 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

ACENAPHTHYLENE 240 2000 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

ANTHRACENE 1800 22 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

BENZO(a)ANTHRACENE 0.092 4.7 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

BENZO(a)PYRENE 0.2 0.81 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

BENZO(b)FLUORANTHENE 0.092 0.75 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

BENZO(g,h,i)PERYLENE 1500 0.13 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

BENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE 0.92 0.4 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

CHRYSENE 9.2 1 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

DIBENZ(a,h)ANTHRACENE 0.0092 0.52 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

FLUORANTHENE 1500 130 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 0.0209 F 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 0.019 F 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

FLUORENE 240 950 0.0384 F 0.0167 0.0556 0.144 0.0165 0.0549 0.122 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

INDENO(1,2,3-c,d)PYRENE 0.092 0.095 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

NAPHTHALENE 17 21 0.33 0.0344 0.111 17.3 0.341 1.1 15.7 0.352 1.14 ND U 0.0333 0.108 ND U 0.0356 0.115 0.0375 F 0.0326 0.105 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

PHENANTHRENE 240 410 0.0204 F 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 0.0182 F 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

PYRENE 180 68 ND U 0.0167 0.0556 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.017 0.0568 ND U 0.0161 0.0538 ND U 0.0172 0.0575 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.52 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 200 970 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.067 500 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 5 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 2.4 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE (TCP) 0.6 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 70 3000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 0.04 10 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) 0.0065 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 600 10 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 0.15 7000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 5 10 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 180 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 75 5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

ACETONE 22000 20000 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

BENZENE 5 170 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 0.22 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

BROMOFORM 100 510 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

BROMOMETHANE 8.7 50000 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 520 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

CHLOROBENZENE 100 50 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

CHLOROETHANE 8600 16 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

CHLOROFORM 70 2400 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

CHLOROMETHANE 1.8 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 70 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 0.43 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.16 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

ETHYLBENZENE 700 30 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 0.86 6 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

M,P-XYLENE (SUM OF ISOMERS) 10000 20 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

METHYL ETHYL KETONE (2-BUTANONE) 7100 8400 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE) 2000 1300 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

METHYLENE CHLORIDE 4.8 9100 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

NAPHTHALENE 17 21 ND U 0.62 2 31.5 0.62 2 9.3 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

STYRENE 100 10 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) 5 170 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

TOLUENE 1000 40 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 100 260 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) 5 310 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

VINYL CHLORIDE 2 3400 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

XYLENES, TOTAL 10000 20 ND U 1 2 ND U 1 2 ND U 1 2 ND U 1 2 ND U 1 2 ND U 1 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

6020 LEAD 15 50000 ND U 0.31 1 1.53 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

PAHs - Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons MDL - Method detection limit

VOCs - Volatile organic compounds RL - Reporting limit

UG/L - Micrograms per Liter TPH - Total petroleum hydrocarbons 

Q - Data qualifier ND - Indicates that the compound was not detected above the stated method detection limit

U - Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected at or above the stated limit NA - not analyzed

F - Indicates that the compound was identified but the concentration was above the MDL and below the RL

- Result exceeds one or both HDOH EALs

1

2

January 26, 2010 January 26, 2010 January 27, 2010 January 27, 2010

Final Drinking Water Action Levels for Human Toxicity, Table D-3a, Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with 

Contaminated Soil and Groundwater , HDOH, 2009

Groundwater Gross Contamination Action Levels, Table G-1, Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with 

Contaminated Soil and Groundwater , HDOH, 2009

January 26, 2010

8015B (Petroleum)

8270C SIM 

(PAHs)

8260B 

(VOCs)

RHMW02DUG/L

January 27, 2010 February 23, 2010 February 23, 2010

RHMW05

UG/L

RHMW2254-01

UG/L

RHMW02

UG/L

RHMW02

UG/L

RHMW02D

UG/L

RHMW03

UG/L Method

HDOH Drinking Water 

EALs1

for Human Toxicity 

UG/L

HDOH Groundwater 

Gross Contamination 

EALs2

UG/L

Chemical

RHMW01

UG/L

RHMW02 RHMW02DUG/L UG/L

March 30, 2010 March 30, 2010
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

16 

TPH-GRO was detected above the laboratory MDL of 30 μg/L in the normal and duplicate 

samples (i.e., 42.3F μg/L and 38.1F μg/L, respectively). Naphthalene was analyzed by USEPA 

Method 8270C SIM and USEPA Method 8260B. USEPA Method 8260B produced the highest 

naphthalene concentrations, which averaged 20.4 μg/L from the normal and duplicate sample 

(HDOH Drinking Water EAL is 17 μg/L). In addition, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-

methylnaphthalene, acenaphthene, and flourene were detected at average concentrations of 8.645 

μg/L, 3.25 μg/L, 0.239 μg/L, and 0.133 μg/L, respectively (Table 1). Fluoranthene was only 

detected in the duplicate sample at 0.0209F μg/L. All of these concentrations are below the 

HDOH EALs for each constituent, except for 1-methylnaphthalene (HDOH Drinking Water 

EAL is 4.7 μg/L). The only other constituent detected above the laboratory MDL was dissolved 

lead in the normal sample only, at a concentration of 1.53 μg/L 

 (HDOH Drinking Water EAL is 15 μg/L). 

RHMW03

No parameters were detected above the laboratory MDLs in RHMW03 (Table 1). 

RHMW05

TPH-DRO was detected at a concentration of 2,060 μg/L. This concentration exceeds the 

HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 210 μg/L and the HDOH Groundwater Gross Contamination 

EAL of 100 μg/L. However, TICs apparently not associated with petroleum from the Facility 

were detected at significant concentrations in RHMW05. After subtracting the TICs, TPH-DRO 

was estimated at a concentration of 541 μg/L (see Appendix B). 

In addition, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, fluoranthene, and phenanthrene were 

detected above the laboratory MDL at 0.0207F μg/L, 0.0246F μg/L, 0.019F μg/L, and 0.0182F 

μg/L, respectively. All of these concentrations are below the HDOH EALs for each constituent 

(Table 1). 

US Navy Well 2254-01

Naphthalene was detected at 0.0375F μg/L, just above the laboratory MDL and below the 

HDOH drinking water EAL of 17 μg/L (Table 1). 

3.2 Groundwater Contaminant Trend 

Groundwater samples have been collected and analyzed by TEC since September 2005. Figure 1 

shows TPH trends in groundwater at the Facility. Figure 2 shows PAH trends in groundwater at 

the Facility. In these figures, open icons (without data) represent locations where the compounds 

being analyzed were not detected. 

The following is a discussion of compounds that exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs during 

two or more recent consecutive sampling events, thus establishing a trend: 

 

RHMW01

At RHMW01, concentrations of TPH-DRO have been greater than the HDOH Drinking Water 

EAL since September 2005, but less than 25 percent of the SSRBL of 4,500 g/L. TPH-DRO 

had exhibited a decreasing trend since October 2008 with the lowest concentration (i.e., 248 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

17 

μg/L) recorded in July 2009. Since July 2009, this trend began increasing with 299F μg/L and 

312F μg/L detected in October 2009 and January 2010, respectively. 

RHMW02

At RHMW02, from September 2005 through March 2009, TPH-DRO exceeded the HDOH 

Drinking Water EAL and was greater than 50 percent of the SSRBL (estimated solubility limit of 

4,500 g/L). Specifically, the concentration of TPH-DRO was relatively stable at RHMW02 

until July 2008, ranging from 2,250 to 2,995 μg/L. However, during the July and October 2008 

sampling events, these average concentrations increased. The July 2008 average concentration 

was 4,055 μg/L and the October 2008 average concentration was 5,420 μg/L. Both of these 

values were significantly above the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 210 μg/L, with the October 

2008 average also exceeding the SSRBL of 4,500 μg/L. 

However, TPH-DRO at RHMW02 has shown a decreasing trend from October 2008 through 

July 2009. During this period, TPH-DRO remained above the HDOH Drinking Water EAL, but 

was below 50 percent of the SSRBL of 4,500 μg/L. In October 2009, TPH-DRO began an 

increasing trend greater than 50 percent of the SSRBL which continued through February 2010 

when it exceeded the SSRBL. It is important to note that in January and February 2010, TICs 

apparently not associated with petroleum from the Facility were detected at significant 

concentrations. After subtracting the TICs from these results, the January 2010 TPH-DRO 

average shows a slight decrease from the October 2009 event. However, the February 2010 resampling event showed an increased average of 3,200 μg/L (Appendix B), exceeding the HDOH 

Drinking Water EAL and being over 50 percent of the SSRBL. The TPH-DRO concentration 

averaged 2,490 μg/L during the March 2010 re-sampling event when unlike during January and 

February, TICs were not observed at significant concentrations (Appendix B). 

 

For other parameters, the average concentration for 1-methylnaphthalene (i.e., 8.645 g/L) 

exhibited an increase from an October 2009 concentration that was less than the HDOH Drinking 

Water EAL of 4.7 g/L. Naphthalene had shown an increasing trend since its lowest 

concentration in May 2009. In January 2010, naphthalene in RHMW02 (i.e., 20.4 μg/L) 

exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 17 μg/L, but slightly decreased relative to the 

October 2009 concentration (i.e., 21.65 μg/L). 

RHMW03

At RHMW03, historically, concentrations of TPH-DRO have fluctuated around the HDOH 

Drinking Water EAL, but have been significantly lower than corresponding values observed at 

RHMW01 and RHMW02. However, during the last four sampling events (i.e., May 2009, July 

2009, October 2009, and January 2010), TPH-DRO was not detected above the laboratory MDL. 

These results represent a continuing decreasing trend for TPH-DRO that has existed since 

October 2008. 

RHMW05

At RHMW05 there is an increasing trend for TPH-DRO over the last four sampling rounds. The 

January 2010 concentration was 2,060 μg/L, an increase as compared with the October 2009 

concentration of 673 μg/L. The January 2010 concentration is greater than the HDOH EAL, but 

less than 50 percent of the SSRBL for TPH-DRO. However, as with RHMW02, TICs apparently 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

18 

not associated with petroleum from the Facility were detected at significant concentrations in 

RHMW05. After subtracting the TICs from the January 2010 results, TPH-DRO was estimated 

at a concentration of 541 μg/L (see Appendix B). 

US Navy Well 2254-01

At US Navy Well 2254-01, no compounds have been detected above the laboratory MDLs since 

trace concentrations of TPH-GRO and 2-methylnaphthalene that were observed in the February 

and May 2009. However, in January 2010, naphthalene was detected at 0.0375F μg/L via EPA 

Method 8270C SIM, just above the laboratory MDL (i.e., 0.0326 μg/L) and below the HDOH 

EAL (i.e., 17 μg/L). 

3.3 Results of Oil/Water Interface Measurements 

The presence and thickness of light-non aqueous phased liquids (LNAPL), otherwise known as 

free product, released from the USTs is monitored at the Facility (see Table 2). Static water 

levels and fuel thickness is measured to a precision of ± 0.01 feet. 

In January 2008, fuel was measured in monitoring wells RHMW01 and RHMW02 at a thickness 

of < 0.01 ft, but has not been observed in other monitoring wells. Measurements to determine 

the presence and thickness of fuel were conducted at RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and 

RHMW05 prior to the January 2010 sampling round. At the end of February and March, 

subsequent rounds of oil/water interface measurements were conducted. Since January 2008, no 

free product has been observed in any of these wells. 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

19 

Table 2. Oil/Water Interface Measurements 

            

Date 

RHMW01 RHMW02 RHMW03 RHMW05 

SWL 

(ft) 

LNAPL 

(ft) 

SWL 

(ft) 

LNAPL 

(ft) 

SWL 

(ft) 

LNAPL 

(ft) 

SWL6 

(ft) 

LNAPL 

(ft) 

 January 2008 17.74 < 0.01 18.78 < 0.01 NT1 NT1 ---- ---- 

 July 2008 19.04 0.00 18.91 0.00 18.86 0.00 ---- ---- 

October 2008 18.61 0.00 18.56 0.00 18.82 0.00 ---- ---- 

November 2008 18.50 0.00 18.45 0.00 18.51 0.00 ---- ---- 

January 2009 19.28 0.00 19.22 0.00 19.27 0.00 ---- ---- 

February 2009 NT2 NT2 18.66 0.00 18.75 0.00 ---- ---- 

March 2009 18.59 0.00 18.57 0.00 18.67 0.00 ---- ---- 

May 20093 18.69 0.00 18.64 0.00 18.72 0.00 NT5 NT5

May 2009 18.91 0.00 18.86 0.00 18.90 0.00 NT5 NT5

July 20094 18.66 0.00 18.59 0.00 18.64 0.00 18.63 0.00 

August 2009 18.37 0.00 18.30 0.00 18.47 0.00 18.21 0.00 

September 2009 18.20 0.00 18.17 0.00 18.24 0.00 18.11 0.00 

October 2009 18.17 0.00 18.14 0.00 18.24 0.00 18.10 0.00 

November 2009 18.50 0.00 18.45 0.00 18.50 0.00 18.47 0.00 

December 2009 18.29 0.00 18.26 0.00 18.31 0.00 18.19 0.00 

January 2010 18.05 0.00 18.01 0.00 18.09 0.00 17.97 0.00 

February 2010 18.17 0.00 18.12 0.00 18.17 0.00 18.12 0.00 

March 2010 17.88 0.00 17.86 0.00 17.93 0.00 17.76 0.00 

SWL - Static water level, elevation above mean sea level 

LNAPL - Light Non-Aqueous Phased Liquid, fuel product on groundwater attributed to the Facility 

ft - Feet 

NT - Not Taken 1

 - The January 2008 measurement at RHMW03 was not taken due to equipment malfunction 2 - During the February 2009 measurements, RHMW01 was inaccessible due to extensive work being conducted at Tank 02 3

 - The measurements scheduled for April 2009 were postponed until May 6, 2009 due to RHMW05 drilling activities 4

 – The June 2009 measurements were skipped due to the installation of dedicated oil/water interface probes 5 - Oil/water interface measurements were not taken at RHMW05 until the installation of the oil/water interface probe was completed 6 – Elevation at RHMW05 is estimated from the difference between RHMW01 and RHMW05 during a survey conducted in January 2010 

---- - Time period prior to the installation of RHMW05 

Oil/water interface measurements were not taken in April 2008 

3.4 Groundwater Status 

Constituents of concern are defined as petroleum-related chemicals that have been observed in 

the groundwater samples above the HDOH EALs. In accordance with the Red Hill Bulk Fuel 

Storage Facility Final Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008), Table 3 defines the 

constituents of concern in groundwater at the Facility and the SSRBLs and updated EALs for 

each (HDOH 2008). 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

20 

Table 3. Action Levels for Constituents of Concern 

Chemical EAL (μg/L) SSRBL (μg/L) 

Petroleum Mixtures 

TPH-DRO 210 4,500 

TPH-GRO 100 4,500 

Semi-Volatile Compounds 

1-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 NA 

2-Methylnaphthalene 24 NA 

Naphthalene 17 NA 

NA – Not applicable or not determined 

SSRBLs are applicable at RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 

EALs are applicable at US Navy Well 2254-01 

In addition, the Plan defines four results categories of groundwater status for the Facility, based 

on concentrations of constituents of concern in RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05 

and the US Navy Well 2254-01, and requires specific responses when these categories are 

observed during quarterly groundwater sampling. Table 4 describes each of the four results 

categories and identifies response actions to be taken in accordance with the Plan. 

 Table 4. Results Categories and Response Actions to Changes in Groundwater Status 

Results Category RHMW02 

RHMW03 or 

RHMW05* 

RHMW01 US Navy Pumping 

Well 2254-01 

Results Category 1: Result above 

detection limit but below drinking 

water EAL and trend for all 

compounds stable or decreasing 

A A A,D,M,E 

Results Category 2: Trend for any 

compound increasing or drinking 

water EAL exceeded 

A, B A, B A,B,C,D,E,F,G,K, 

L,O 

Results Category 3: Result 

Between 1/10X SSRBL and 

SSRBL for benzene, or between 

1/2X SSRBL and SSRBL for TPH 

A,B,G,H,I,J A,B,E,G,H,I,J A,B,C,D,E,F,G,I,J,

K,L,O 

Results Category 4: Result 

Exceeding any SSRBL or 

petroleum product observed 

A,C,D,E,F,I,J, 

K,M,N 

A,C,D,E,F,I, 

J,K,M,N,O 

A,C,D,E,F,G,I,J,K,

L,O 

*RHMW05 was installed in April 2009 and has been subsequently been added to this Table. 

Specific Responses: 

A. Send quarterly reports to HDOH 

B. Begin program to determine the source of leak 

C. Notify HDOH verbally within 1 day and follow with written notification in 30 days 

D. Notify FISC Chain of Command within 1 day 

E. Send Type 1 Report (see box below) to HDOH 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

21 

F. Send Type 2 Report (see box below) to HDOH 

G. Increase monitoring frequency to once per month (if concentrations increasing) 

H. Notify HDOH verbally within 7 days and follow with written notification in 30 days 

I. Remove sampling pumps, measure product in pertinent wells with interface probe, re-install 

pumps if product is not detected. 

J. Immediately determine leaking tank 

K. Collect samples from nearby Halawa Deep Monitoring Well (2253-03) and OWDF MW01 

L. Provide alternative water source at 2254-01 

M. Prepare for alternative water source at US Navy Well 2254-01 

N. Re-measure for product every month with reports to HDOH 

O. Install additional monitoring well downgradient 

Report Types 

HDOH Type 1 Report 

 Re-evaluate Tier 3 Risk Assessment/groundwater model results 

 Proposal to HDOH on a course of action 

HDOH Type 2 Report 

 Proposal for groundwater treatment 

Free Product Measurements

In response to the previous Category 3 status at RHMW02, free product measurements have 

been collected at the Facility monitoring wells (Table 2). To date, there is no trend (i.e., two or 

more consecutive events) of fuel presence on groundwater at any of these wells. 

US Navy Well 2254-01

Although a trace concentration of naphthalene was detected at US Navy Well 2254-01 during the 

January 2010 sampling event, it does not place the well into the Category 1 status. Because no 

contamination trend (i.e., two or more consecutive events of detectable concentrations) has been 

established, US Navy Well 2254-01 does not meet the Category 1 definition. 

RHMW03

Based upon the January 2010 sampling event, RHMW03 is not eligible for any category status 

change since no compounds were detected above the laboratory MDLs. 

Category 1 Status Locations

There are no Category 1 status locations based upon the January 2010 event. 

Category 2 Status Locations

RHMW01 

The January 2010 sampling event indicates that RHMW01 should remain in Category 2 status. 

This is because the TPH-DRO concentration of 312F g/L is greater than the HDOH Drinking 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

22 

Water EAL (210 g/L), but less than half the SSRBL of 4,500 g/L (estimated solubility limit of 

JP-5). 

RHMW05

Based upon the January 2010 sampling event RHMW05 should remain in a Category 2 status. 

TPH-DRO in RHMW05 (i.e., 2,060 μg/L) is above the drinking water EAL of 210 μg/L and has 

been showing an increasing trend over the last four rounds. However, as with RHMW02, TICs 

apparently not associated with petroleum from the Facility were detected at significant 

concentrations in RHMW05. After subtracting the TICs from the January 2010 results, TPHDRO was estimated at a concentration of 541 μg/L which still exceeds the drinking water EAL 

(Appendix B). 

 

Category 2 for RHMW01 and RHMW05 requires: 

1. Quarterly reports to be sent to HDOH; and 

2. Initiation of a leak determination program to identify if tanks are leaking. 

Category 3 Status Locations

RHMW02 

Results from the January 2010 sampling event and the resample event in February 2010 indicate 

that RHMW02 remains in Category 3 status. This is because TPH-DRO, after subtracting the 

TICs apparently not associated with petroleum from the Facility, is greater than the HDOH 

Drinking Water EAL (210 g/L), and is between one half and the established SSRBL value of 

4,500 g/L (estimated solubility limit of JP-5). Specifically, the maximum observed TPH-DRO 

TICs adjusted concentration among the January 2010 and February 2010 sampling efforts 

occurred during the February 2010 effort with adjusted concentrations of 3,470 g/L and 2,930 

g/L (duplicate) (Appendix B). However, TPH-DRO averaged 2,490 μg/L during the March 

2010 re-sampling event when unlike during January and February, TICs were not observed at 

significant concentrations (Appendix B). 

In addition, the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 17 g/L for naphthalene was exceeded in 

January 2010 [i.e., 20.4 g/L (the average of normal and duplicate samples)]. 

Category 3 response at RHMW02 requires: 

1. Send quarterly reports to HDOH; 

2. Initiation of a leak determination program to identify if tanks are leaking; 

3. Increase free product monitoring frequency to once per month (if concentrations 

increasing); 

4. Notify HDOH verbally within 7 days and follow with written notification in 30 days; 

5. Remove sampling pumps, measure product in lower access tunnel wells with interface 

probe, re-install pumps if product is not detected; and 

6. Immediately evaluate tanks for leaks. 

 

Category 4 Status Locations

There are no Category 4 status locations. 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

23 

4.0 Summary and Conclusions 

Summary

There is no indication of an immediate threat of disruption to drinking water resources of the US 

Navy Well 2254-01 as a result of the January and February 2010 data. However, a trace 

concentration of naphthalene was detected just above the laboratory MDL, but significantly less 

than the HDOH drinking water EAL at RHMW2254-01. The increasing TPH-DRO 

concentrations at RHMW05 are of significant concern. This well is less than 700 feet from the 

east end of the US Navy Well 2254-01 infiltration gallery. The TPH-DRO concentration in this 

well was nearly 50 percent of the SSRBL prior to a re-quantification that adjusted the 

concentration by removing apparently non-fuel related TIC compounds from the TPH-DRO total 

concentration (Appendix B). If the total TPH-DRO concentration at RHMW05 had been from 

fuel-related compounds, there could be a high probability of contamination at some point 

entering the infiltration gallery. 

With the exception of RHMW03 and RHMW2254-01, compound concentrations for all the other 

monitoring wells (i.e., RHMW01, RHMW02, and RHMW05) are exhibiting increasing 

contaminant trends for TPH-DRO relative to the concentrations observed in October 2009. 

Current results from RHMW01 are still at concentration levels within the historical range. 

However, results from RHMW02 and RHMW05 have been exhibiting significant increases (i.e., 

for the non-TIC adjusted concentrations). After a thorough analysis of the analytical results from 

RHMW02 and RHMW05, TICs apparently not attributed to petroleum from the Facility 

contributed to a significant increase of TPH-DRO during January and February 2010 (see 

Appendix B). After subtracting these TICs, the estimated TPH-DRO concentrations in 

RHMW02 and RHMW05 remain within the historical range. 

Conclusions/Recommendations

 To date, there is no trend (i.e., two or more consecutive events) of fuel presence on 

groundwater at the Facility wells (Table 2). In fact, fuel on the groundwater has been 

observed only once (i.e., in January 2008 in RHMW01 and RHMW02 at less than 0.01 

ft.). It is recommended that the Facility continue regular monitoring of Facility wells for 

the presence of fuel on groundwater. 

 The concentration of TPH-DRO measured in the newest monitoring well, RHMW05, in 

January 2010 (i.e., 2,060 g/L) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL, but was less 

than half of the SSRBL. RHMW05 is located between RHMW01 and the US Navy Well 

2254-01. It is recommended that future quarterly analytical results be closely assessed at 

RHMW05, since its non-TIC adjusted concentrations exhibit an increasing contaminant 

trend for TPH-DRO (i.e., 200 μg/L in May 2009, 491μg/L in July 2009, 673 μg/L in 

October 2009, and 2,060 μg/L in January 2010). 

 RHMW01 and RHMW02 are exhibiting increasing contaminant trends, however, when 

adjusted for apparently non-fuel related TICs are still at concentration levels within the 

historical range. It is recommended that quarterly monitoring of the Facility wells 

continue so that overall groundwater quality trends may be established/observed and 

proactive action taken if the groundwater quality shows greater evidence of deterioration. 
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

24 

 The US Navy Well 2254-01 is not imminently threatened at this time; however, 

monitoring should continue to evaluate the extent of contaminant migration from upgradient locations. 

 Do a more detailed analytical assessment of the contamination found in RHMW05 (and 

other wells) such as having future samples analyzed using the MADEP analytical 

methods in addition to TPH-GRO and TPH-DRO analytical methods. 

 The following activities are in process to monitor and/or clarify the groundwater 

contamination situation at the Facility: 

1. Re-evaluate risk assessment and groundwater model (TEC, 2007) to ensure both 

are valid and protective of human health and the environment under the existing 

conditions; 

2. Continue monthly free product measurements at RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, and RHMW05; 

3. Continue to collect samples from nearby Halawa Deep Monitoring Well (2253-

03), OWDF MW01, and RHMW04 to assess regional groundwater trends; 

4. Prepare for alternative water source at US Navy Well 2254-01, if appropriate. 

5. Continue quarterly groundwater monitoring of Facility wells for TPH-DRO, TPHGRO, VOCs, PAHs, and lead until such time that new data indicates that a 

different monitoring program is warranted. 
The HDOH toxicity EALs were updated in •TPH DRO Residential Tap Water EAL is 21•TPH-DRO Residential Tap Water EAL is 21•TPH-GRO Residential Tap Water EAL is 10(HDOH, 2008).
The HDOH toxicity EALs were updated in • Naphthalene Residential Tap Water EAL 

1 th l hth l R id ti l T W t 

• 1-methylnaphthalene 

Residential Tap 

Wat

• 2- methylnaphthalene Residential Tap Wa(HDOH, 2008).
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility April 2010 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

27 

5.0 References 

AMEC. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Investigation Report, Prepared for NAVFAC 

Pacific, August 2002. 

Dawson Group, Inc. Fourth Quarter 2005 Groundwater Sampling Report, Red Hill Fuel 

Storage Facility, Hawaii. February 2006. 

Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 281, Subchapter 7. 

HDOH. Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and 

Groundwater, Summary Lookup Tables. March 2009. 

HDOH. Use of May 2005 Environmental Action Levels (“EALs”) at Leaking Underground 

Storage Tank Sites. Memo. July 2005. 

HDOH. Evaluation of Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and 

Groundwater. Summer 2008 (updated October 2008). 

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP). Implementation of the 

MADEP VPH/EPH Approach. Final Policy, October 2002 

The Environmental Company, Inc. and AMEC. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Work Plan, 

Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. June 2005. 

TEC, Inc. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final – Addendum Planning Documents, Pearl 

Harbor, Hawaii. May 2006. 

TEC, Inc. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Technical Report, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. 

August 2007. 

TEC, Inc. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Pearl 

Harbor, Hawaii. January 2008 revised in December 2009. 
Appendix A 

Laboratory Analytical Reports 
APPENDIX 

A-1 

 Laboratory Analytical Results 

January 26 - 27, 2010 
SGS Work Order:

Contents:

Cover Page

Case Narrative

Final Report Pages

Quality Control Summary Forms

Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms

Project:

Client:

SGS North America Inc.

 Alaska Division

Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by: 

Note:

Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the 

SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference.

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1100328

1 of 93
Case Narrative

THEENVC The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1100328 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Customer:

Project:

SGS North America Inc.

Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition.

1100328005 PS RHMW02-WG18

DRO by 8015C - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present.

1100328006 PS RHMWA01-WG18

DRO by 8015C - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present.

1100328008 PS RHMW05-WG18

DRO by 8015C - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present.

1100328003 BMSD RHMW2254-WG18 MSD

8270D SIM - MS recovery is outside of QC criteria for fluoranthene (biased high). Refer to LCS for accuracy.

947960 LCS VXX/20449]

8260B - LCS recovery for 1,1-dichloroethane does not meet QC criteria (biased high). This analyte was not 

detected above the PQL in the associated samples.

947961 LCSD VXX/20449

8260B - LCSD recovery for 1,1-dichloroethane, cis-1,3-dichloropropene and methyl-t-butyl ether does not meet QC 

criteria (biased high). These analytes were not detected above the PQL in the associated samples.

947963 CCV VMS/11094]

8260B - CCV recovery for 1,1-dichloroethane does not meet QC criteria (biased high). This analyte was not 

detected above the PQL in the associated samples.

2 of 93
Laboratory Analytical Report

Project:

Client:

Workorder No.:

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1100328

Certification:

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, 

both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data 

sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and 

the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory.

1003 Bishop Street,

Pauahi Tower Suite 1550

Honolulu, HI 96813

Attn: Rick Adkisson

T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768

Jennifer Serna

Project Manager

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please 

contact your SGS Project Manager.

SGS No rth Americ a Inc . En vir onmenta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com Member of SG S Group

3 of 93
Enclosed are the analytical results associated with the above work order. If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any 

other assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 907-562-2343. All work is provided under SGS general terms and conditions 

(<http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm>), unless other written agreements have been accepted by both parties. 

SGS maintains a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program. A copy of our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this 

program, is available at your request. The laboratory certification numbers are AK00971 (DW Chemistry & Microbiology) & UST-005 (CS) for 

ADEC and AK100001 for NELAP (RCRA methods: 1020A, 1311, 3010A, 3050B, 3520C, 3550C, 5030B, 5035B, 6010B, 6020, 7470A, 7471B, 

8021B, 8081B, 8082A, 8260B, 8270D, 8270D-SIM, 9040B, 9045C, 9056A, 9060A, AK101 and AK102/103). Except as specifically noted, all 

statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP and, when applicable, the National Environmental 

Laboratory Accreditation Program and other regulatory authorities. The following descriptors or qualifiers may be found in your report:

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits.

! Surrogate out of control limits.

B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample.

CCV Continuing Calibration Verification

CL Control Limit

D The analyte concentration is the result of a dilution.

DF Dilution Factor

DL Detection Limit (i.e., maximum method detection limit)

E The analyte result is above the calibrated range.

F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the DL

GT Greater Than

ICV Initial Calibration Verification

J The quantitation is an estimation.

JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation.

LCS(D) Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate)

LOD Limit of Detection (i.e., 2xDL)

LOQ Limit of Quantitation (i.e., reporting or practical quantitation limit)

LT Less Than

M A matrix effect was present.

MB Method Blank

MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate)

ND Indicates the analyte is not detected.

Q QC parameter out of acceptance range.

R Rejected

RPD Relative Percent Difference

U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.

Note: Sample summaries which include a result for "Total Solids" have already been adjusted for moisture content.

All DRO/RRO analyses are integrated per SOP.

Print Date: 2/10/2010

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

4 of 93
SAMPLE SUMMARY

Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Project Name: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Workorder No.: 1100328

Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method

8270 PAH SIM Semi-Vol GC/MS Liq/Liq ext. 8270D SIMS

AFCEE 3.1 8260 (W) SW8260B

Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS SW6020

DRO by 8015C (W) SW8015C

GRO (W) SW8015C

Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Sample ID Cross Reference

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID

1100328001 RHMW2254-WG18

1100328002 RHMW2254-WG18 MS

1100328003 RHMW2254-WG18 MSD

1100328004 RHMW03-WG18

1100328005 RHMW02-WG18

1100328006 RHMWA01-WG18

1100328007 RHMW01-WG18

1100328008 RHMW05-WG18

1100328009 TB01-WG18

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

5 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW2254-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 5 MMS6300 MXX22713

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL

Analytical Batch: MMS6300

Analytical Method: SW6020

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:21

Prep Batch: MXX22713

Prep Method: SW3010A

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328001-G

Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

6 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW2254-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 30.0 ug/L 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 95.2 50-150 % 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9854

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:28

Prep Batch: VXX20443

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328001-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

7 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW2254-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 0.320 U 0.426 0.160 mg/L 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

5a Androstane <surr> 87.1 50-150 % 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 940 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC9100

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 19:56

Prep Batch: XXX22248

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328001-J

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

8 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW2254-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 1.50 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 0.300 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 0.940 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

9 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW2254-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 101 73-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene-d8 <surr> 99.7 80-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 103 76-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

10 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW2254-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VMS11094

Analytical Method: SW8260B

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 17:00

Prep Batch: VXX20449

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328001-D

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

11 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW2254-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328001 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 09:20

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Acenaphthene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluorene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Phenanthrene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Anthracene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluoranthene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Pyrene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Chrysene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Naphthalene 0.0375 J 0.105 0.0326 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

1-Methylnaphthalene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0316 U 0.0526 0.0158 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 115 50-126 % 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 950 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS5285

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 13:56

Prep Batch: XXX22249

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328001-H

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

12 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW03-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 5 MMS6300 MXX22713

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL

Analytical Batch: MMS6300

Analytical Method: SW6020

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:43

Prep Batch: MXX22713

Prep Method: SW3010A

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328004-G

Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

13 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW03-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 30.0 ug/L 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 95.3 50-150 % 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9854

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 12:41

Prep Batch: VXX20443

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328004-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

14 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW03-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 0.330 U 0.440 0.165 mg/L 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

5a Androstane <surr> 92.6 50-150 % 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC9100

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 20:59

Prep Batch: XXX22248

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328004-J

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

15 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW03-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 1.50 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 0.300 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 0.940 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

16 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW03-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 101 73-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene-d8 <surr> 99.1 80-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 102 76-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

17 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW03-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VMS11094

Analytical Method: SW8260B

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 17:31

Prep Batch: VXX20449

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328004-D

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

18 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW03-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328004 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 11:00

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Acenaphthene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluorene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Phenanthrene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Anthracene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluoranthene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Pyrene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Chrysene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Naphthalene 0.0666 U 0.108 0.0333 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

1-Methylnaphthalene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0322 U 0.0538 0.0161 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 110 50-126 % 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 930 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS5285

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 15:34

Prep Batch: XXX22249

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328004-H

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

19 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW02-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 1.53 1.00 0.310 ug/L 5 MMS6300 MXX22713

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL

Analytical Batch: MMS6300

Analytical Method: SW6020

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:45

Prep Batch: MXX22713

Prep Method: SW3010A

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328005-G

Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

20 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW02-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 42.3 J 100 30.0 ug/L 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 111 50-150 % 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9854

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 13:19

Prep Batch: VXX20443

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328005-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

21 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW02-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 2.13 0.430 0.161 mg/L 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

5a Androstane <surr> 90.8 50-150 % 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 930 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC9100

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 21:20

Prep Batch: XXX22248

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328005-J

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

22 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW02-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Butylbenzene 3.49 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Propylbenzene 5.48 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 1.50 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 0.300 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 0.940 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

23 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW02-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

sec-Butylbenzene 5.10 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Naphthalene 31.5 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

tert-Butylbenzene 0.920 J 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 3.73 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 101 73-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene-d8 <surr> 98.1 80-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 104 76-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

24 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW02-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VMS11094

Analytical Method: SW8260B

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 18:02

Prep Batch: VXX20449

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328005-D

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

25 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW02-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328005 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 16:30

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Acenaphthene 0.247 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluorene 0.144 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Phenanthrene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Anthracene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluoranthene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Pyrene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Chrysene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0330 U 0.0549 0.0165 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Naphthalene 17.3 1.10 0.341 ug/L 10 XMS5287 XXX22249

1-Methylnaphthalene 9.03 0.549 0.165 ug/L 10 XMS5287 XXX22249

2-Methylnaphthalene 3.85 0.549 0.165 ug/L 10 XMS5287 XXX22249

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 111 50-126 % 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS5285

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:07

Prep Batch: XXX22249

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328005-H

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS5287

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 02/03/10 12:45

Prep Batch: XXX22249

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328005-H

Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

26 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMWA01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 5 MMS6300 MXX22713

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL

Analytical Batch: MMS6300

Analytical Method: SW6020

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:47

Prep Batch: MXX22713

Prep Method: SW3010A

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328006-G

Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

27 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMWA01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 38.1 J 100 30.0 ug/L 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 112 50-150 % 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9854

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 13:38

Prep Batch: VXX20443

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328006-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

28 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMWA01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 3.41 0.449 0.169 mg/L 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

5a Androstane <surr> 83.1 50-150 % 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 890 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC9100

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 21:41

Prep Batch: XXX22248

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328006-J

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

29 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMWA01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Butylbenzene 4.42 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Propylbenzene 6.48 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 1.50 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 0.300 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 0.940 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

30 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMWA01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

sec-Butylbenzene 6.42 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Naphthalene 9.30 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

tert-Butylbenzene 1.19 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 4.54 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 106 73-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene-d8 <surr> 98.7 80-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 103 76-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

31 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMWA01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VMS11094

Analytical Method: SW8260B

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 18:33

Prep Batch: VXX20449

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328006-D

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

32 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMWA01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328006 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 12:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Acenaphthene 0.231 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluorene 0.122 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Phenanthrene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Anthracene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluoranthene 0.0209 J 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Pyrene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Chrysene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0340 U 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Naphthalene 15.7 1.14 0.352 ug/L 10 XMS5287 XXX22249

1-Methylnaphthalene 8.26 0.568 0.170 ug/L 10 XMS5287 XXX22249

2-Methylnaphthalene 2.65 0.0568 0.0170 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 112 50-126 % 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 880 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS5285

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:39

Prep Batch: XXX22249

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328006-H

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 880 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS5287

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 02/03/10 13:17

Prep Batch: XXX22249

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328006-H

Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

33 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 5 MMS6300 MXX22714

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL

Analytical Batch: MMS6300

Analytical Method: SW6020

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 17:15

Prep Batch: MXX22714

Prep Method: SW3010A

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328007-L

Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

34 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 30.0 ug/L 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 98.2 50-150 % 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9854

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 13:57

Prep Batch: VXX20443

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328007-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

35 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 0.312 J 0.440 0.165 mg/L 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

5a Androstane <surr> 92.7 50-150 % 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC9100

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 22:02

Prep Batch: XXX22248

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328007-J

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

36 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 1.50 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 0.300 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 0.940 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

37 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 101 73-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene-d8 <surr> 100 80-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 102 76-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

38 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VMS11094

Analytical Method: SW8260B

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 19:04

Prep Batch: VXX20449

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328007-D

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

39 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328007 Collection Date/Time: 01/27/10 15:40

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Acenaphthene 0.0372 J 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluorene 0.0384 J 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Phenanthrene 0.0204 J 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Anthracene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluoranthene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Pyrene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Chrysene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Naphthalene 0.330 0.111 0.0344 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

1-Methylnaphthalene 0.0334 U 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0559 0.0556 0.0167 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 121 50-126 % 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 900 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS5285

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 17:11

Prep Batch: XXX22249

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328007-H

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

40 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW05-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

DL DF

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 5 MMS6300 MXX22713

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL

Analytical Batch: MMS6300

Analytical Method: SW6020

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:49

Prep Batch: MXX22713

Prep Method: SW3010A

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:00 Container ID:1100328008-G

Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

41 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW05-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 30.0 ug/L 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 96.9 50-150 % 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9854

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:23

Prep Batch: VXX20443

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328008-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

42 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW05-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 2.06 0.449 0.169 mg/L 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

5a Androstane <surr> 88.5 50-150 % 1 XFC9100 XXX22248

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 890 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC9100

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 22:23

Prep Batch: XXX22248

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 10:20 Container ID:1100328008-J

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

43 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW05-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 1.50 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 0.300 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 0.940 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

44 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW05-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 99.6 73-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene-d8 <surr> 99.7 80-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 105 76-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

45 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW05-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VMS11094

Analytical Method: SW8260B

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 19:36

Prep Batch: VXX20449

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328008-D

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

46 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: RHMW05-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328008 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 17:15

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

DL DF

Acenaphthylene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Acenaphthene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluorene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Phenanthrene 0.0182 J 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Anthracene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Fluoranthene 0.0190 J 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Pyrene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Chrysene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0344 U 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Naphthalene 0.0712 U 0.115 0.0356 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

1-Methylnaphthalene 0.0207 J 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0246 J 0.0575 0.0172 ug/L 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 120 50-126 % 1 XMS5285 XXX22249

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 870 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS5285

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 17:44

Prep Batch: XXX22249

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 11:20 Container ID:1100328008-H

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

47 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: TB01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328009 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 08:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

DL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 30.0 ug/L 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 101 50-150 % 1 VFC9854 VXX20443

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9854

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 02/01/10 14:42

Prep Batch: VXX20443

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/01/10 09:00 Container ID:1100328009-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

48 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: TB01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328009 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 08:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 1.50 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 0.300 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 0.940 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

49 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: TB01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328009 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 08:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 1.00 ug/L 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 101 73-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

Toluene-d8 <surr> 98.1 80-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 108 76-120 % 1 VMS11094 VXX20449

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

50 of 93
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 2/10/2010 8:51 am

Client Sample ID: TB01-WG18

SGS Ref. #: 1100328009 Collection Date/Time: 01/26/10 08:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 01/29/10 11:45

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

DL DF

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VMS11094

Analytical Method: SW8260B

Analysis Date/Time: 02/02/10 16:28

Prep Batch: VXX20449

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 02/02/10 11:17 Container ID:1100328009-B

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

51 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947654 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22248

SW3520C

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units

Analysis

DL Date

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics 0.300 U 0.400 0.150 mg/L 02/02/10

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> 93.2 60-120 % 02/02/10

Instrument

Method

Batch XFC9100

SW8015C

HP 7890A FID SV E F

52 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947711 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22249

SW3520C

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units

Analysis

DL Date

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Acenaphthylene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Acenaphthene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Fluorene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Phenanthrene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Anthracene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Fluoranthene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Pyrene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Benzo(a)Anthracene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Chrysene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Naphthalene 0.0620 U 0.100 0.0310 ug/L 02/02/10

1-Methylnaphthalene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0300 U 0.0500 0.0150 ug/L 02/02/10

Surrogates 

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 109 50-126 % 02/02/10

Instrument

Method

Batch XMS5285

8270D SIMS

HP 6890/5973 MS SVQA

53 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947747 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20443

SW5030B

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008, 1100328009

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units

Analysis

DL Date

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics 60.0 U 100 30.0 ug/L 02/01/10

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 96.8 50-150 % 02/01/10

Instrument

Method

Batch VFC9854

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCA

54 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947859 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

MXX22713

SW3010A

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328008

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units

Analysis

DL Date

Metals by ICP/MS

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Instrument

Method

Batch MMS6300

SW6020

Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3

55 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947864 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

MXX22714

SW3010A

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328007

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units

Analysis

DL Date

Metals by ICP/MS

Lead 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Instrument

Method

Batch MMS6300

SW6020

Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3

56 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947959 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

SW5030B

02/02/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008, 1100328009

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units

Analysis

DL Date

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

57 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947959 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

SW5030B

02/02/2010

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units

Analysis

DL Date

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

Benzene 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 02/02/10

Toluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Ethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

n-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 02/02/10

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 02/02/10

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

4-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Chlorobenzene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 02/02/10

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 02/02/10

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

4-Isopropyltoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 02/02/10

n-Propylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Styrene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Dibromomethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Acetone 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 02/02/10

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 02/02/10

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 02/02/10

Methyl-t-butyl ether 3.00 U 5.00 1.50 ug/L 02/02/10

Tetrachloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Dibromochloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 02/02/10

1,3-Dichloropropane 0.240 U 0.400 0.120 ug/L 02/02/10

1,2-Dibromoethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Carbon tetrachloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 02/02/10

Chloroform 0.600 U 1.00 0.300 ug/L 02/02/10

Bromobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Chloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Bromomethane 1.88 U 3.00 0.940 ug/L 02/02/10

Bromochloromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Vinyl chloride 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Chloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

sec-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Bromodichloromethane 0.300 U 0.500 0.150 ug/L 02/02/10

58 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947959 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

SW5030B

02/02/2010

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units

Analysis

DL Date

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

2-Butanone (MEK) 6.20 U 10.0 3.10 ug/L 02/02/10

Methylene chloride 2.00 U 5.00 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10

Trichlorofluoromethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

P & M -Xylene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 02/02/10

Naphthalene 1.24 U 2.00 0.620 ug/L 02/02/10

o-Xylene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Bromoform 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1-Chlorohexane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

tert-Butylbenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

2-Chlorotoluene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Trichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

2,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,1-Dichloropropene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.620 U 1.00 0.310 ug/L 02/02/10

Xylenes (total) 2.00 U 2.00 1.00 ug/L 02/02/10

Surrogates 

1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 103 73-120 % 02/02/10

Toluene-d8 <surr> 100 80-120 % 02/02/10

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 105 76-120 % 02/02/10

Instrument

Method

Batch VMS11094

SW8260B

HP 5890 Series II MS1 VJA

59 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947712 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22249

SW3520C

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Acenaphthylene LCS 0.403 81 ( 50-101 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Acenaphthene LCS 0.406 81 ( 45-93 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Fluorene LCS 0.421 84 ( 50-98 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Phenanthrene LCS 0.434 87 ( 50-104 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Anthracene LCS 0.437 87 ( 55-105 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Fluoranthene LCS 0.512 102 ( 58-109 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Pyrene LCS 0.491 98 ( 56-105 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo(a)Anthracene LCS 0.523 105 ( 55-120 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chrysene LCS 0.464 93 ( 56-109 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene LCS 0.481 96 ( 45-120 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[k]fluoranthene LCS 0.493 99 ( 56-112 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[a]pyrene LCS 0.507 101 ( 57-110 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene LCS 0.456 91 ( 55-111 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene LCS 0.461 92 ( 54-113 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene LCS 0.439 88 ( 49-116 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Naphthalene LCS 0.354 71 ( 44-89 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

1-Methylnaphthalene LCS 0.385 77 ( 42-92 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

2-Methylnaphthalene LCS 0.363 73 ( 45-89 ) 0.5 ug/L 02/02/2010

Surrogates 

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> LCS 103 ( 50-126 ) 02/02/2010

60 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947712 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22249

SW3520C

02/01/2010

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Batch

Method

Instrument

XMS5285

8270D SIMS

HP 6890/5973 MS SVQA

61 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947748 Lab Control Sample

947749 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20443

SW5030B

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008, 1100328009

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics LCS 198 99 ( 79-108 ) 200 ug/L 02/01/2010

LCSD 185 93 7 (< 20 ) 200 ug/L 02/01/2010

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> LCS 100 ( 50-150 ) 02/01/2010

LCSD 98 2 02/01/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9854

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCA

62 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947860 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

MXX22713

SW3010A

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328008

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Metals by ICP/MS

Lead LCS 1030 103 ( 80-120 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

MMS6300

SW6020

Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3

63 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947865 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

MXX22714

SW3010A

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328007

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Metals by ICP/MS

Lead LCS 1020 102 ( 80-120 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

MMS6300

SW6020

Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3

64 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947960 Lab Control Sample

947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

SW5030B

02/02/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008, 1100328009

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

65 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947960 Lab Control Sample

947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

SW5030B

02/02/2010

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

Benzene LCS 31.2 104 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.3 108 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Toluene LCS 32.1 107 ( 77-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.3 111 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Ethylbenzene LCS 32.1 107 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.9 110 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

n-Butylbenzene LCS 35.9 120 ( 80-124 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 37.0 123 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,4-Dichlorobenzene LCS 32.3 108 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.4 115 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dichloroethane LCS 33.2 111 ( 80-129 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.2 114 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene LCS 34.1 114 ( 80-128 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 35.9 120 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

4-Chlorotoluene LCS 34.5 115 ( 79-128 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 36.6 122 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chlorobenzene LCS 32.0 107 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.7 109 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) LCS 94.8 105 ( 69-134 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 96.6 107 2 (< 20 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene LCS 34.8 116 ( 80-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 31.7 106 9 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

4-Isopropyltoluene LCS 34.6 115 ( 80-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 36.6 122 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene LCS 35.3 118 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 36.6 122 * 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

n-Propylbenzene LCS 34.0 113 ( 80-129 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 35.8 119 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

66 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947960 Lab Control Sample

947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

SW5030B

02/02/2010

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

Styrene LCS 32.7 109 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.6 112 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dibromomethane LCS 33.0 110 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.5 112 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene LCS 32.7 109 ( 80-124 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.5 115 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene LCS 32.3 108 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 35.0 117 8 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Acetone LCS 80.9 90 ( 50-135 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 81.7 91 1 (< 20 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane LCS 32.6 109 ( 76-123 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.5 115 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane LCS 33.1 110 ( 73-130 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 35.0 117 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Methyl-t-butyl ether LCS 53.2 118 ( 80-120 ) 45 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 55.2 123 * 4 (< 20 ) 45 ug/L 02/02/2010

Tetrachloroethene LCS 32.0 107 ( 79-122 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.5 108 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dibromochloromethane LCS 28.9 96 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 30.4 101 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,3-Dichloropropane LCS 33.2 111 ( 80-121 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.8 116 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dibromoethane LCS 32.2 107 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.8 109 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Carbon tetrachloride LCS 32.1 107 ( 80-126 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.2 111 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane LCS 33.5 112 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

67 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947960 Lab Control Sample

947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

SW5030B

02/02/2010

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

LCSD 35.1 117 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chloroform LCS 31.6 105 ( 80-124 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.2 107 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromobenzene LCS 31.7 106 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.1 110 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chloromethane LCS 32.7 109 ( 67-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.0 113 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,3-Trichloropropane LCS 30.8 103 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.6 109 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromomethane LCS 27.1 90 ( 30-140 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 30.9 103 13 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromochloromethane LCS 29.4 98 ( 77-129 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 29.4 98 0 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Vinyl chloride LCS 29.0 97 ( 72-145 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 29.2 97 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dichlorodifluoromethane LCS 31.8 106 ( 62-153 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.6 109 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chloroethane LCS 29.7 99 ( 67-133 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 30.1 100 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

sec-Butylbenzene LCS 34.2 114 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 35.9 120 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromodichloromethane LCS 34.4 115 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 35.5 118 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1-Dichloroethene LCS 27.5 92 ( 76-130 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 28.4 95 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

2-Butanone (MEK) LCS 94.0 104 ( 66-136 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 94.8 105 1 (< 20 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

68 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947960 Lab Control Sample

947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

SW5030B

02/02/2010

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

Methylene chloride LCS 27.4 91 ( 63-131 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 28.3 94 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Trichlorofluoromethane LCS 29.4 98 ( 68-145 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 29.8 99 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

P & M -Xylene LCS 66.2 110 ( 80-120 ) 60 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 67.7 113 2 (< 20 ) 60 ug/L 02/02/2010

Naphthalene LCS 31.8 106 ( 75-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.7 112 6 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

o-Xylene LCS 31.4 105 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.8 109 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromoform LCS 29.4 98 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 31.0 103 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1-Chlorohexane LCS 48.6 108 ( 70-125 ) 45 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 49.3 109 1 (< 20 ) 45 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene LCS 34.2 114 ( 80-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 36.0 120 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

tert-Butylbenzene LCS 33.1 110 ( 80-122 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.7 116 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,1-Trichloroethane LCS 32.9 110 ( 80-122 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.0 110 0 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1-Dichloroethane LCS 37.9 126 ( 80-120 ) * 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 38.8 129 * 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

2-Chlorotoluene LCS 34.0 113 ( 80-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 35.7 119 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Trichloroethene LCS 33.0 110 ( 80-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.7 112 2 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene LCS 33.2 111 ( 79-132 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.6 112 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

69 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947960 Lab Control Sample

947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

SW5030B

02/02/2010

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

1,2-Dichlorobenzene LCS 31.9 106 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.2 114 7 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

2,2-Dichloropropane LCS 33.6 112 ( 80-132 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.5 112 0 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Hexachlorobutadiene LCS 31.5 105 ( 77-125 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.7 109 4 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) LCS 34.0 113 ( 80-121 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.3 114 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dichloropropane LCS 35.3 118 ( 80-121 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 36.3 121 3 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1-Dichloropropene LCS 34.1 114 ( 80-122 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.3 114 1 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,2-Trichloroethane LCS 32.1 107 ( 77-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 33.9 113 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,3-Dichlorobenzene LCS 32.7 109 ( 80-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 34.5 115 5 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene LCS 30.5 102 ( 77-120 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 32.6 109 7 (< 20 ) 30 ug/L 02/02/2010

Xylenes (total) LCS 97.6 108 ( 80-120 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

LCSD 100 112 3 (< 20 ) 90 ug/L 02/02/2010

Surrogates 

1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> LCS 99 ( 73-120 ) 02/02/2010

LCSD 100 0 02/02/2010

Toluene-d8 <surr> LCS 97 ( 80-120 ) 02/02/2010

LCSD 96 2 02/02/2010

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> LCS 102 ( 76-120 ) 02/02/2010

LCSD 102 1 02/02/2010

70 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947960 Lab Control Sample

947961 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

SW5030B

02/02/2010

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

Batch

Method

Instrument

VMS11094

SW8260B

HP 5890 Series II MS1 VJA

71 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

947982 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22248

SW3520C

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328001, 1100328004, 1100328005, 1100328006, 1100328007, 1100328008

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics LCS 4.84 97 ( 75-125 ) 5 mg/L 02/02/2010

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> LCS 98 ( 60-120 ) 02/02/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

XFC9100

SW8015C

HP 7890A FID SV E F

72 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

947866 Matrix Spike

947867 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1100319001

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

MXX22714

3010 H20 Digest for Metals ICP-MS

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100328007

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Metals by ICP/MS

Lead MS (0.620) U 985 99 ( 80-120 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010

MSD 1010 101 3 (< 15 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

MMS6300

SW6020

Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3

73 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike

1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

MXX22713

3010 H20 Digest for Metals ICP-MS

02/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

Lead BMS (0.620) U 1050 105 ( 80-120 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 1010 101 4 (< 15 ) 1000 ug/L 02/02/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

MMS6300

SW6020

Perkin Elmer Sciex ICP-MS P3

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics BMS (60.0) U 462 103 ( 79-108 ) 450 ug/L 02/01/2010

BMSD 468 104 1 (< 20 ) 450 ug/L 02/01/2010

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> BMS 51.1 102 ( 50-150 ) 02/01/2010

BMSD 51.4 103 1 02/01/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9854

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCA

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics BMS (0.320) U 5.06 92 ( 75-125 ) 5.49 mg/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 4.56 84 11 (< 30 ) 5.43 mg/L 02/02/2010

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> BMS .104 95 ( 50-150 ) 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.0947 87 10 02/02/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

XFC9100

SW8015C

HP 7890A FID SV E F

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

74 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike

1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

Volatiles Extraction AFCEE 3.1 8260 (

02/02/2010

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

Benzene BMS (0.240) U 28.8 96 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 29.0 97 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Toluene BMS (0.620) U 29.8 99 ( 77-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.2 104 5 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Ethylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 30.3 101 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.8 103 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

n-Butylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 33 110 ( 80-124 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 34.5 115 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,4-Dichlorobenzene BMS (0.300) U 30.9 103 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.1 107 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dichloroethane BMS (0.300) U 30.6 102 ( 80-129 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.7 102 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 31.6 105 ( 80-128 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 33.0 110 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

4-Chlorotoluene BMS (0.620) U 32 107 ( 79-128 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 33.8 113 6 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chlorobenzene BMS (0.300) U 29.9 100 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.1 104 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) BMS (6.20) U 96.2 107 ( 69-134 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 86.9 97 10 (< 20 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BMS (0.620) U 31.7 106 ( 80-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.1 104 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

4-Isopropyltoluene BMS (0.620) U 32.3 108 ( 80-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 33.8 113 5 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BMS (0.300) U 33.2 111 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 33.2 111 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

n-Propylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 31.6 105 ( 80-129 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.9 110 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Styrene BMS (0.620) U 29.9 100 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.6 102 3 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dibromomethane BMS (0.620) U 30.6 102 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.7 102 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BMS (0.620) U 30.8 103 ( 80-124 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.3 108 5 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BMS (0.620) U 31.4 105 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.8 109 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Acetone BMS (6.20) U 83.7 93 ( 50-135 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 81.4 90 3 (< 20 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BMS (0.300) U 32.6 109 ( 76-123 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.4 108 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

75 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike

1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

Volatiles Extraction AFCEE 3.1 8260 (

02/02/2010

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BMS (1.24) U 33.4 111 ( 73-130 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 33.3 111 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Methyl-t-butyl ether BMS (3.00) U 51.7 115 ( 80-120 ) 45.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 50.5 112 2 (< 20 ) 45.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Tetrachloroethene BMS (0.620) U 29.3 98 ( 79-122 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.3 101 3 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dibromochloromethane BMS (0.300) U 27.7 92 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 28.9 96 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,3-Dichloropropane BMS (0.240) U 31.7 106 ( 80-121 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.9 110 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dibromoethane BMS (0.620) U 30.8 103 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.6 105 3 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Carbon tetrachloride BMS (0.620) U 30.2 101 ( 80-126 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.1 100 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane BMS (0.300) U 31.4 105 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.3 108 3 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chloroform BMS (0.600) U 29.2 97 ( 80-124 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 29.3 98 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromobenzene BMS (0.620) U 29.8 99 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.8 103 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chloromethane BMS (0.620) U 31.9 106 ( 67-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.3 104 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,3-Trichloropropane BMS (0.620) U 30.4 101 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.7 102 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromomethane BMS (1.88) U 31.1 104 ( 30-140 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.6 105 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromochloromethane BMS (0.620) U 27 90 ( 77-129 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 27.7 92 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Vinyl chloride BMS (0.620) U 26.9 90 ( 72-145 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 26.7 89 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dichlorodifluoromethane BMS (0.620) U 30 100 ( 62-153 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.0 100 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chloroethane BMS (0.620) U 27.1 90 ( 67-133 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 27.3 91 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

sec-Butylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 31.7 106 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 33.2 111 5 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromodichloromethane BMS (0.300) U 32.3 108 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.6 109 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1-Dichloroethene BMS (0.620) U 26.2 87 ( 76-130 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 25.8 86 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

76 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike

1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

Volatiles Extraction AFCEE 3.1 8260 (

02/02/2010

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

2-Butanone (MEK) BMS (6.20) U 98.5 109 ( 66-136 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 92.6 103 6 (< 20 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Methylene chloride BMS (2.00) U 26 87 ( 63-131 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 26.4 88 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Trichlorofluoromethane BMS (0.620) U 26.9 90 ( 68-145 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 26.9 90 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

P & M -Xylene BMS (1.24) U 61.3 102 ( 80-120 ) 60.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 63.5 106 4 (< 20 ) 60.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Naphthalene BMS (1.24) U 32.6 109 ( 75-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 33.0 110 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

o-Xylene BMS (0.620) U 29.3 98 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.4 101 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Bromoform BMS (0.620) U 29.3 98 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 29.9 100 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1-Chlorohexane BMS (0.620) U 44.8 99 ( 70-125 ) 45.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 46.1 102 3 (< 20 ) 45.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 31.9 106 ( 80-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 33.4 111 5 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

tert-Butylbenzene BMS (0.620) U 30.8 103 ( 80-122 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.1 107 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,1-Trichloroethane BMS (0.620) U 30.5 102 ( 80-122 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.3 101 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1-Dichloroethane BMS (0.620) U 34.5 115 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 34.9 116 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

2-Chlorotoluene BMS (0.620) U 31.9 106 ( 80-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 33.1 110 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Trichloroethene BMS (0.620) U 30.2 101 ( 80-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.5 102 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BMS (0.620) U 30.9 103 ( 79-132 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.6 102 1 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dichlorobenzene BMS (0.620) U 30.2 101 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.4 105 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

2,2-Dichloropropane BMS (0.620) U 31.4 105 ( 80-132 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.4 105 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Hexachlorobutadiene BMS (0.620) U 29.2 97 ( 77-125 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.6 105 8 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) BMS (0.620) U 31.3 104 ( 80-121 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.4 108 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2-Dichloropropane BMS (0.620) U 32.2 107 ( 80-121 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.7 109 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

77 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike

1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX20449

Volatiles Extraction AFCEE 3.1 8260 (

02/02/2010

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

1,1-Dichloropropene BMS (0.620) U 31 103 ( 80-122 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.0 103 0 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,1,2-Trichloroethane BMS (0.620) U 31.2 104 ( 77-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 31.8 106 2 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,3-Dichlorobenzene BMS (0.620) U 30.8 103 ( 80-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 32.0 107 4 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene BMS (0.620) U 30.1 100 ( 77-120 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.9 103 3 (< 20 ) 30.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Xylenes (total) BMS (2.00) U 90.6 101 ( 80-120 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 93.9 104 4 (< 20 ) 90.0 ug/L 02/02/2010

Surrogates 

1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> BMS 29.8 99 ( 73-120 ) 02/02/2010

BMSD 28.9 96 3 02/02/2010

Toluene-d8 <surr> BMS 28.9 96 ( 80-120 ) 02/02/2010

BMSD 29.4 98 2 02/02/2010

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> BMS 30.9 103 ( 76-120 ) 02/02/2010

BMSD 30.9 103 0 02/02/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

VMS11094

SW8260B

HP 5890 Series II MS1 VJA

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

78 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike

1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22249

3520 Liquid/Liquid Ext for 8270 SIM

02/01/2010

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Acenaphthylene BMS (0.0316) U .459 87 ( 50-101 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.423 80 8 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Acenaphthene BMS (0.0316) U .448 85 ( 45-93 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.399 75 12 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Fluorene BMS (0.0316) U .469 89 ( 50-98 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.437 82 7 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Phenanthrene BMS (0.0316) U .469 89 ( 50-104 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.459 86 2 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Anthracene BMS (0.0316) U .488 93 ( 55-105 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.484 91 1 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Fluoranthene BMS (0.0316) U .562 107 ( 58-109 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.585 110* 4 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Pyrene BMS (0.0316) U .539 102 ( 56-105 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.549 103 2 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo(a)Anthracene BMS (0.0316) U .543 103 ( 55-120 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.568 107 5 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Chrysene BMS (0.0316) U .457 87 ( 56-109 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.495 93 8 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene BMS (0.0316) U .466 89 ( 45-120 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.539 101 15 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[k]fluoranthene BMS (0.0316) U .442 84 ( 56-112 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.523 98 17 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[a]pyrene BMS (0.0316) U .467 89 ( 57-110 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.565 106 19 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene BMS (0.0316) U .482 92 ( 55-111 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.527 99 9 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene BMS (0.0316) U .495 94 ( 54-113 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.538 101 8 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BMS (0.0316) U .48 91 ( 49-116 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.500 94 4 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Naphthalene BMS 0.0375 J .387 67 ( 44-89 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.366 62 6 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

1-Methylnaphthalene BMS (0.0316) U .424 81 ( 42-92 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.407 77 4 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

2-Methylnaphthalene BMS (0.0316) U .389 74 ( 45-89 ) 0.526 ug/L 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.377 71 3 (< 30 ) 0.532 ug/L 02/02/2010

Surrogates 

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> BMS .56 106 ( 50-126 ) 02/02/2010

BMSD 0.577 108 3 02/02/2010

79 of 93
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 02/10/2010 8:51

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

1100328002 Billable Matrix Spike

1100328003 Billable Matrix Spike Dup.

1100328001

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22249

3520 Liquid/Liquid Ext for 8270 SIM

02/01/2010

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Batch

Method

Instrument

XMS5285

8270D SIMS

HP 6890/5973 MS SVQA

80 of 93
81 of 93
82 of 93
83 of 93
84 of 93
85 of 93
86 of 93
87 of 93
88 of 93
89 of 93
90 of 93
91 of 93
92 of 93
93 of 93
APPENDIX 

A-2 

 Laboratory Analytical Results 

February 23, 2010 
SGS Work Order:

Contents:

Cover Page

Case Narrative

Final Report Pages

Quality Control Summary Forms

Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms

Project:

Client:

SGS North America Inc.

 Alaska Division

Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by: 

Note:

Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the 

SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference.

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1100658
CASE NARRATIVE Print Date: 3/4/2010

Workorder No.: 1100658

Project Name: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Lab Sample ID

Sample Comments

Sample Type Client Sample ID

Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition.

1100658001

AK102 - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present.

PS RHMW02-WG18B

1100658002

AK102 - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present.

PS RHMWA01-WG18B

SG S N o rth A m eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l D ivision 200 W e st Potter D rive A nc hora ge A K 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w w w .us.sgs.com M em ber of SG S Group
Laboratory Analytical Report

Project:

Client:

Workorder No.:

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1100658

Certification:

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, 

both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data 

sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and 

the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory.

1003 Bishop Street,

Pauahi Tower Suite 1550

Honolulu, HI 96813

Attn: Rick Adkisson

T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768

Jennifer Serna

Project Manager

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please 

contact your SGS Project Manager.

SGS No rth Americ a Inc . En vir onmenta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com Member of SG S Group
Enclosed are the analytical results associated with the above work order. If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any 

other assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 907-562-2343. All work is provided under SGS general terms and conditions 

(<http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm>), unless other written agreements have been accepted by both parties. 

SGS maintains a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program. A copy of our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this 

program, is available at your request. The laboratory certification numbers are AK00971 (DW Chemistry & Microbiology) & UST-005 (CS) for 

ADEC and AK100001 for NELAP (RCRA methods: 1020A, 1311, 3010A, 3050B, 3520C, 3550C, 5030B, 5035B, 6010B, 6020, 7470A, 7471B, 

8021B, 8081B, 8082A, 8260B, 8270D, 8270D-SIM, 9040B, 9045C, 9056A, 9060A, AK101 and AK102/103). Except as specifically noted, all 

statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP and, when applicable, the National Environmental 

Laboratory Accreditation Program and other regulatory authorities. The following descriptors or qualifiers may be found in your report:

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits.

! Surrogate out of control limits.

B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample.

CCV Continuing Calibration Verification

CL Control Limit

D The analyte concentration is the result of a dilution.

DF Dilution Factor

DL Detection Limit (i.e., maximum method detection limit)

E The analyte result is above the calibrated range.

F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the DL

GT Greater Than

ICV Initial Calibration Verification

J The quantitation is an estimation.

JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation.

LCS(D) Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate)

LOD Limit of Detection (i.e., 2xDL)

LOQ Limit of Quantitation (i.e., reporting or practical quantitation limit)

LT Less Than

M A matrix effect was present.

MB Method Blank

MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate)

ND Indicates the analyte is not detected.

Q QC parameter out of acceptance range.

R Rejected

RPD Relative Percent Difference

U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.

Note: Sample summaries which include a result for "Total Solids" have already been adjusted for moisture content.

All DRO/RRO analyses are integrated per SOP.

Print Date: 3/4/2010

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group
SAMPLE SUMMARY

Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Project Name: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Workorder No.: 1100658

Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method

DRO by 8015C (W) SW8015C

Print Date: 3/4/2010 4:07 pm

Sample ID Cross Reference

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID

1100658001 RHMW02-WG18B

1100658002 RHMWA01-WG18B

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 3/4/2010 4:07 pm

Client Sample ID: RHMW02-WG18B

SGS Ref. #: 1100658001 Collection Date/Time: 02/23/10 10:25

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 02/24/10 11:00

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 8.65 0.440 0.165 mg/L 1 XFC9119 XXX22334

5a Androstane <surr> 81.3 50-150 % 1 XFC9119 XXX22334

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC9119

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 03/02/10 01:29

Prep Batch: XXX22334

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 03/01/10 10:05 Container ID:1100658001-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 3/4/2010 4:07 pm

Client Sample ID: RHMWA01-WG18B

SGS Ref. #: 1100658002 Collection Date/Time: 02/23/10 12:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 02/24/10 11:00

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 6.91 0.435 0.163 mg/L 1 XFC9119 XXX22334

5a Androstane <surr> 89.3 50-150 % 1 XFC9119 XXX22334

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 920 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC9119

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 03/02/10 01:50

Prep Batch: XXX22334

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 03/01/10 10:05 Container ID:1100658002-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 03/04/2010 16:07

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

950630 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22334

SW3520C

03/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100658001, 1100658002

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units

Analysis

DL Date

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics 0.300 U 0.400 0.150 mg/L 03/02/10

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> 91.7 60-120 % 03/02/10

Instrument

Method

Batch XFC9119

SW8015C

HP 7890A FID SV E F
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 03/04/2010 16:07

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

950633 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22334

SW3520C

03/01/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1100658001, 1100658002

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics LCS 4.09 82 ( 75-125 ) 5 mg/L 03/02/2010

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> LCS 94 ( 60-120 ) 03/02/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

XFC9119

SW8015C

HP 7890A FID SV E F




APPENDIX 

A-3 

 Laboratory Analytical Results 

March 30, 2010 
SGS Work Order:

Contents:

Cover Page

Case Narrative

Final Report Pages

Quality Control Summary Forms

Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms

Project:

Client:

SGS North America Inc.

 Alaska Division

Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by: 

Note:

Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the 

SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference.

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1101343

1 of 14
CASE NARRATIVE Print Date: 4/8/2010

Workorder No.: 1101343

Project Name: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Lab Sample ID

Sample Comments

Sample Type Client Sample ID

Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition.

1101343001

AK102 - The pattern is consistent with a weathered middle distillate.

PS RHMW02-WG18C

1101343002

AK102 - The pattern is consistent with a weathered middle distillate.

PS RHMWA01-WG18C

SG S N o rth A m eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l D ivision 200 W e st Potter D rive A nc hora ge A K 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w w w .us.sgs.com M em ber of SG S Group

2 of 14
Laboratory Analytical Report

Project:

Client:

Workorder No.:

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1101343

Certification:

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, 

both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data 

sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and 

the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory.

1003 Bishop Street,

Pauahi Tower Suite 1550

Honolulu, HI 96813

Attn: Rick Adkisson

T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768

Jennifer Serna

jennifer.serna@sgs.com

Project Manager

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please 

contact your SGS Project Manager.

SGS No rth Americ a Inc . En vir onmenta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com Member of SGS Group

3 of 14
Enclosed are the analytical results associated with the above work order. If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any 

other assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 907-562-2343. All work is provided under SGS general terms and conditions 

(<http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm>), unless other written agreements have been accepted by both parties. 

SGS maintains a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program. A copy of our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this 

program, is available at your request. The laboratory certification numbers are AK00971 (DW Chemistry & Microbiology) & UST-005 (CS) for 

ADEC and AK100001 for NELAP (RCRA methods: 1020A, 1311, 3010A, 3050B, 3520C, 3550C, 5030B, 5035B, 6010B, 6020, 7470A, 7471B, 

8021B, 8081B, 8082A, 8260B, 8270D, 8270D-SIM, 9040B, 9045C, 9056A, 9060A, AK101 and AK102/103). Except as specifically noted, all 

statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP and, when applicable, the National Environmental 

Laboratory Accreditation Program and other regulatory authorities. The following descriptors or qualifiers may be found in your report:

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits.

! Surrogate out of control limits.

B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample.

CCV Continuing Calibration Verification

CL Control Limit

D The analyte concentration is the result of a dilution.

DF Dilution Factor

DL Detection Limit (i.e., maximum method detection limit)

E The analyte result is above the calibrated range.

F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the DL

GT Greater Than

ICV Initial Calibration Verification

J The quantitation is an estimation.

JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation.

LCS(D) Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate)

LOD Limit of Detection (i.e., 2xDL)

LOQ Limit of Quantitation (i.e., reporting or practical quantitation limit)

LT Less Than

M A matrix effect was present.

MB Method Blank

MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate)

ND Indicates the analyte is not detected.

Q QC parameter out of acceptance range.

R Rejected

RPD Relative Percent Difference

U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.

Note: Sample summaries which include a result for "Total Solids" have already been adjusted for moisture content.

All DRO/RRO analyses are integrated per SOP.

Print Date: 4/8/2010

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

4 of 14
SAMPLE SUMMARY

Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Project Name: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Workorder No.: 1101343

Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method

DRO by 8015C (W) SW8015C

Print Date: 4/8/2010 5:29 pm

Sample ID Cross Reference

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID

1101343001 RHMW02-WG18C

1101343002 RHMWA01-WG18C

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

5 of 14
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 4/8/2010 5:29 pm

Client Sample ID: RHMW02-WG18C

SGS Ref. #: 1101343001 Collection Date/Time: 03/30/10 10:25

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 03/31/10 11:14

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 2.63 0.460 0.172 mg/L 1 XFC9145 XXX22440

5a Androstane <surr> 86.7 50-150 % 1 XFC9145 XXX22440

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 870 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC9145

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 04/07/10 16:23

Prep Batch: XXX22440

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 04/02/10 09:55 Container ID:1101343001-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

6 of 14
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 4/8/2010 5:29 pm

Client Sample ID: RHMWA01-WG18C

SGS Ref. #: 1101343002 Collection Date/Time: 03/30/10 12:05

Project ID: 3354-003 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 03/31/10 11:14

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result LOQ/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

DL DF

Diesel Range Organics 2.35 0.444 0.167 mg/L 1 XFC9145 XXX22440

5a Androstane <surr> 89 50-150 % 1 XFC9145 XXX22440

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 900 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC9145

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 04/07/10 16:44

Prep Batch: XXX22440

Prep Method: SW3520C

Prep Date/Time: 04/02/10 09:55 Container ID:1101343002-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: LCE

SGS No rth Am eric a Inc . En vir onm enta l Division 200 W e st Potter D rive Anc hora ge AK 99518 t(907 )562.2343 f( 907)561 .5301 w ww.us.sgs.com M ember of SG S Group

7 of 14
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 04/08/2010 17:30

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

954865 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22440

SW3520C

04/02/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1101343001, 1101343002

Parameter Results LOQ/CL Units

Analysis

DL Date

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics 0.300 U 0.400 0.150 mg/L 04/07/10

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> 76.6 60-120 % 04/07/10

Instrument

Method

Batch XFC9145

SW8015C

HP 7890A FID SV E F

8 of 14
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 04/08/2010 17:30

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

954867 Lab Control Sample

954869 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

3354-003 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

XXX22440

SW3520C

04/02/2010

QC results affect the following production samples:

1101343001, 1101343002

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics LCS 3.94 79 ( 75-125 ) 5 mg/L 04/07/2010

LCSD 4.10 82 4 (< 20 ) 5 mg/L 04/07/2010

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> LCS 84 ( 60-120 ) 04/07/2010

LCSD 87 4 04/07/2010

Batch

Method

Instrument

XFC9145

SW8015C

HP 7890A FID SV E F

9 of 14
10 of 14
11 of 14
12 of 14
13 of 14
14 of 14
Appendix B 

January, February, and March 2010 TPH-DRO Results 

Memorandum 
 April 19, 2010 

January 2010 Sampling Event at the Red Hill Facility 

TPH-DRO at RHMW02 

The January 2010 total petroleum hydrocarbon, diesel range organics (TPH-DRO) results at RHMW02 

were significantly impacted by two large peaks identified by the laboratory as caprolactam and DEET. 

These tentatively identified compound (TIC) peaks were reported as part of the TPH-DRO result because 

according to the analytical method, all peaks within the diesel range must be quantified. However, these 

TICs are apparently unrelated to Red Hill Bulk Fuels Storage Facility (Facility) stored fuels. Caprolactam 

is a monomer used to produce “Nylon 6” and is found in plastics and possibly in paints and floor polishes. 

DEET is a pesticide commonly used as an insect repellent. 

Neither of these TIC compounds was detected as part of the laboratory extraction or instrument quality 

control process (e.g., method blanks, instrument blanks, and laboratory control spikes). Also, 

caprolactam and DEET are not used or found in the SGS laboratory that performed the analysis. 

Therefore, the TICs are not laboratory introduced contaminants. In addition, the same field personnel 

performed the January sampling and their sampling approach was identical to that used in previous 

Facility sampling events. Furthermore, the field personnel were extremely careful and cognizant not to 

introduce any contaminants to the collected and/or shipped samples. Consequently, it is not believed that 

the TICs were introduced via the analytical or sampling/shipping process. 

As shown in Table 1, these two significant TIC peaks (i.e., identified by the laboratory as caprolactam 

and DEET) contributed significantly to the reported TPH-DRO results. Although the TPH-DRO 

analytical method requires that all peaks in the diesel range be quantified for the “officially reported” 

TPH-DRO result, Table 1 estimates what the respective TPH-DRO concentrations would have been 

without the two TIC peaks. The reprocessing or re-quantification results were provided by the laboratory. 

These “adjusted concentrations” more closely represent what would be anticipated with normal and 

duplicate samples. 
Table 1 – January 2010 RHMW02 Analytical Results** 

January 2010 

Results 

Official TPH-DRO Result 

(g/L) 

Estimated TPH-DRO Result 

without the two TIC peaks 

included (g/L) 

RHMW02 2,130 1,740 

RHMW02D 

(duplicate sample) 

3,410 2,110 

Table 1 Note: ** TICs are “tentatively identified” compounds. The TPH-DRO analytical method is not 

specific (i.e., is designed to quantify any and all organic compounds within the diesel range). By scanning 

the TPH-DRO extract via GC/MS, unknown peaks have been “tentatively identified” (i.e., without the 

benefit of “neat” standards and the use of specific methods designed to accurately quantify the particular 

TIC peaks “identified”). Therefore, although the TICs are believed to be the “identified” compounds, there 

is some inherent uncertainty associated with this identification process. This uncertainty is why the 

“officially reported” TPH-DRO result must quantify all the organic compounds within the TPH-DRO 

range. 

 

In summary, these TICs from the January 2010 sampling event are apparently not attributable to stored 

fuels at the Facility, they are not laboratory contaminants, and it is unlikely that they were introduced by 

the sampling/shipping process. 

TPH-DRO at RHMW05

Similar to RHMW02, the January 2010 TPH-DRO result for RHMW05 was significantly impacted by 

two large peaks identified by the laboratory as caprolactam and DEET. These TIC peaks were reported as 

part of the TPH-DRO result because according to the analytical method, all peaks within the diesel range 

must be quantified. However as mentioned above, these TICs are apparently unrelated to Facility stored 

fuels. Caprolactam is a monomer used to produce “Nylon 6” and is found in plastics and possibly in 

paints and floor polishes. DEET is a pesticide commonly used as an insect repellent. 

As with RHMW02, neither of these TIC compounds was detected as part of the laboratory extraction or 

instrument quality control process (e.g., method blanks, instrument blanks, and laboratory control spikes). 

Also, caprolactam and DEET are not used or found in the SGS laboratory that performed the analysis. 

Therefore, the TICs are not laboratory introduced contaminants. In addition, the same field personnel 

performed the January sampling and their sampling approach was identical to that used in previous 

Facility sampling events. Furthermore, the field personnel were extremely careful and cognizant not to 

introduce any contaminants to the collected and/or shipped samples. Consequently, it is not believed that 

the TICs were introduced via the analytical or sampling/shipping process. 

As shown in Table 2, these two significant TIC peaks contributed significantly to the reported TPH-DRO 

results. Although the TPH-DRO analytical method requires that all peaks in the diesel range be 

quantified for the “officially reported” TPH-DRO result, Table 2 estimates what the respective TPH-DRO 

concentrations would have been without the two TIC peaks. The reprocessing or re-quantification results 

were provided by the laboratory. 
Table 2 – January 2010 RHMW05 Analytical Results** 

January 2010 

Results 

Official TPH-DRO Result 

(g/L) 

Estimated TPH-DRO Result 

without the two TIC peaks 

included (g/L) 

RHMW05 2,060 541 

Table 2 Note: ** TICs are “tentatively identified” compounds. The TPH-DRO analytical method is not 

specific (i.e., is designed to quantify any and all organic compounds within the diesel range). By scanning 

the TPH-DRO extract via GC/MS, unknown peaks have been “tentatively identified” (i.e., without the 

benefit of “neat” standards and the use of specific methods designed to accurately quantify the particular 

TIC peaks “identified”). Therefore, although the TICs are believed to be the “identified” compounds, there 

is some inherent uncertainty associated with this identification process. This uncertainty is why the 

“officially reported” TPH-DRO result must quantify all the organic compounds within the TPH-DRO 

range. 

 

In summary, these TICs from the January 2010 sampling event are apparently not attributable to stored 

fuels at the Facility, they are not laboratory contaminants, and it is unlikely that they were introduced by 

the sampling/shipping process. 

February 2010 Re-sampling Event at the Red Hill Facility 

TPH-DRO at RHMW02

Per the Facility Groundwater Protection Plan, because of the January 2010 results for RHMW02, the 

monitoring well was re-sampled in February 2010 for TPH-DRO. The February 2010 TPH-DRO results 

for RHMW02 were significantly impacted by three relatively large TIC peaks. The first peak (i.e., likely 

caprolactum) provided the largest TIC contribution toward the “officially reported” TPH-DRO 

concentration. The second peak was initially thought to be DEET, but following additional analyses, was 

identified to likely be dodecanoic acid. The third TIC peak was not able to be identified, even after 

subsequent analyses. 

These three TIC peaks were reported as part of the TPH-DRO result because according to the analytical 

method, all peaks within the diesel range must be quantified. Caprolactam is a monomer used to produce 

“Nylon 6” and would be found in plastics and possibly in paints and floor polishes. Dodecanoic acid is 

not used or found in the SGS laboratory and was not found as part of the laboratory quality control 

process (e.g., instrument and method blanks), thus is not a laboratory contaminant. The third TIC peak 

that contributed to the “officially reported” TPH-DRO concentration could not be identified, even given 

subsequent analyses. 

Chromatograms from the February laboratory data depict the two TIC peaks (i.e., identified as 

caprolactam and dodecanoic acid) that apparently are unrelated to Facility stored fuels and the third 

unknown TIC compound. The three peaks are summarized on the chromatograph as follows: 

 The first peak marked (~2 minutes) should be caprolactam/nylon6. This is the largest TIC peak 

and is the major TIC contributor to the “officially reported” TPH-DRO result. 

 The second peak marked (~4 minutes) was initially thought to be DEET, but following 

subsequent analysis was identified as likely to be dodecanoic acid. 
 The third peak marked (~6.6 minutes) is an unidentified/unknown compound (i.e., not identifiable 

following an 8270 analytical method TIC library search). This peak was also present on the 

chromatograms for the January 2010 TPH-DRO sample results, but was much smaller and did not 

significantly influence the “officially reported” January TPH-DRO results. 

Note that none of these three TIC peaks appear as part of the associated laboratory quality control process 

(e.g., method blanks and instrument blanks). 

Table 3 depicts the “official reported” TPH-DRO results that include all three TIC peaks described above. 

Table 3 also estimates what the TPH-DRO results would be in the event that the three TIC peaks (i.e., 

likely caprolactam, dodecanoic acid, and an unknown compound) were not present. This reprocessing or 

re-quantification of the chromatograms was performed by the laboratory. 

Table 3 – February 2010 RHMW02 Analytical Results** 

February 2010 

Results 

Official TPH-DRO 

Result (g/L) 

Estimated TPH-DRO Result 

without the three major TIC peaks included

(g/L) 

RHMW02 8,650 3,470 

RHMW02D 

(duplicate sample) 

6,910 2,930 

Table 3 Note: ** TICs are “tentatively identified” compounds. The TPH-DRO analytical method is not 

specific (i.e., is designed to quantify any and all organic compounds within the diesel range). By scanning 

the TPH-DRO extract via GC/MS, unknown peaks have been “tentatively identified” (i.e., without the 

benefit of “neat” standards and the use of specific methods designed to accurately quantify the particular 

TIC peaks “identified”). Therefore, although the TICs are believed to be the “identified” compounds, there 

is some inherent uncertainty associated with this identification process. This uncertainty is why the 

“officially reported” TPH-DRO result must quantify all the organic compounds within the TPH-DRO 

range. 

In summary, for the February analytical results, the first two TICs (and possibly the third TIC) are 

apparently not attributable to stored fuels at the Facility and they are likely not laboratory contaminants. 

Also, it is believed that none of these three TIC peaks have been significant contaminants of past Facility 

TPH-DRO reported concentrations prior to the January and February 2010 sampling events. In addition, 

the same field personnel performed the February sampling and their sampling approach was identical to 

that used in previous Facility sampling events. Furthermore, the field personnel were extremely careful 

and cognizant not to introduce any contaminants to the collected and/or shipped samples. Consequently, 

TEC does not believe that the TICs were introduced via the analytical or sampling/shipping process. 

One identifiable variable that occurred during the January and February sampling events that was not true 

with earlier rounds was the ongoing process of dismantling/removing temporary PVC collection pipelines 

and the demobilization of various equipment and supplies from the tunnel complex. It is unclear how or 

if these occurrences may have had any effect/influence on the January and February 2010 TPH-DRO 

results. 
March 2010 Re-sampling Event at the Red Hill Facility 

TPH-DRO at RHMW02

Per the Facility Groundwater Protection Plan, because of the February 2010 results for RHMW02, the 

monitoring well was re-sampled in March 2010 for TPH-DRO. These sampling results (normal and 

duplicate samples) did not show large concentrations of the TICs described above that are apparently nonfuel related. Furthermore, the TPH-DRO concentrations more closely approximate the levels that have 

been historically observed from RHMW02. Table 4 presents the RHMW02 TPH-DRO March 2010 

results. 

Table 4 – March 2010 RHMW02 Analytical Results 

March 2010 Results Official TPH-DRO Result 

(g/L) 

RHMW02 2,630 

RHMW02D (duplicate 

sample) 

2,350 

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments on my cell phone at 865-742-2181. 

Sincerely, 

Rick Adkisson 

TEC, Project Manager