alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Choctaw Airman takes pride in Native American heritage

/ Published Nov. 30, 2021

ST. JOSEPH, Mo. – “Hailto, Chahta sia Hoke,” said Master Sgt. Sarah Linthacum, the 139th Airlift Wing equal opportunity adviser. That is the greeting in the language of her heritage.

Linthacum is a Choctaw Native American from Oklahoma. She enlisted in the active-duty Air Force in 1999 and eight years later transferred to the National Guard.

Linthacum says her heritage has a major influence in her service as an Airman and her daily life.

“I think a lot of my patriotism is definitely owed to the fact that I just feel a love for the land,” she said.

Linthacum’s Choctaw blood derives from her mother. Throughout history, the Choctaw women held positions of power and their opinions were highly valued.

“The Choctaw tribes have always been a matriarchal society. The matriarchal bloodlines were considered most important,” she said.

Linthacum preserves some practices and traditions to celebrate her heritage, including basket weaving, playing stickball, practicing natural horsemanship with her horse, and learning the Choctaw language. She is also teaching her youngest daughter some language and history.

She says her heritage is a major part of who she is.

“America is our land and our home,” she said. “And my people have been here since basically the beginning, and I feel very, very proud.”
Exhibit 10.2

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
 STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
 EQUITY PLAN

 

WHEREAS, Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Starwood Property Trust, Inc. Equity Plan (the “Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9(d) of the Plan, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company may amend the Plan; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board finds it desirable and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to amend the Plan to (i) increase the number of shares (“Shares”) of the Company’s common stock reserved for the grant of awards under the Plan from 3,112,500 Shares to 6,000,000 Shares; (ii) clarify the prohibitions on the repricing of stock options and stock appreciation rights; and (iii) remove the restriction that no more than an aggregate of 50,000 Shares may be subject to awards granted to the Company’s chief financial officer and/or chief compliance officer.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that, effective as of March 26, 2013, the Plan hereby is amended as follows:

 

1. The last sentence of the second paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan hereby is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 

“Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, except as provided in the second paragraph of Section 5, neither the Board nor the Committee shall, without obtaining the approval of the Company’s stockholders, (i) reduce the purchase or base price of any previously granted Option or SAR, (ii) cancel any previously granted Option or SAR in exchange for another Option or SAR with a lower purchase or base price or (iii) cancel any previously granted Option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award if the purchase or base price of such Option or SAR exceeds the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of such cancellation, in each case other than in connection with a Change of Control.”

 

2. Subject to obtaining the approval of the Company’s shareholders, the first sentence of the first paragraph of Section 5 of the Plan hereby is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 

“The maximum number of shares of Stock reserved for the grant of Awards under the Plan on or after January 1, 2013 shall be equal to 6,000,000, less any shares of common stock issued or subject to awards granted under the Company’s Manager Equity Plan on or after January 1, 2013, subject to adjustment as provided herein.”

 

3. The second sentence of the first paragraph of Section 5 of the Plan hereby is deleted in its entirety.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed this 27th day of March, 2013.

 

	
 
    	
STARWOOD   PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Andrew J. Sossen
MICHAEL RODGERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-0679

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 6, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mallory D. Cooper, Judge.

Christopher J. Anderson, Court-Appointed Counsel, Fourth Judicial Circuit, 

Neptune Beach, for Appellant,

Michael Rodgers, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
Tanknology-NDE  International,  Inc. financial  statements as of the nine months
ended September 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1

       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                  0
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                  15,008,426
<ALLOWANCES>                    1,472,177
<INVENTORY>                       594,038
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               14,814,593
<PP&E>                         19,215,515
<DEPRECIATION>                 13,117,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 28,216,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          10,472,799
<BONDS>                        15,984,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                            1,640
<OTHER-SE>                         16,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   28,216,687
<SALES>                        44,513,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               44,513,355
<CGS>                          33,044,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   8,377,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,243,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 1,960,051
<INCOME-TAX>                      260,253
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             1,699,798
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,699,798
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.07
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Director, Principal and Principal Executive Officer of C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                | Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
|--------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                |                                                      
|                | By:                                                  
|                |                                                      
|                |                                                      
|                | By:                                                  
|                |                                                      
|                |                                                      
|                | By:                                                  
|                |                                                      
|                |                                                      
|Date:           |                                                      
|August 20, 2003 | By:                                                  
|                |                                                      
|                |                                                      
|                |
Request for Information Jude M. Chastain (FAA-2015-3329) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Chastain:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-3329).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date 

listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by December 15, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 7:54 AM 

To: juddchastain@gmail.com
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 15, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00323-CV

RICHARD POWELL, Appellant

V.

YOEN NAVARETTE CARDENAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1012724

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 27, 2014. The notice of 

appeal was filed April 25, 2014. To date, our records show that appellant has not 

paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in 

civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for 

establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. ' 51.207. 
2

On June 5, 2014, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing fee 

on or before June 20, 2014, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not 

paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has 

failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within 

specified time). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.
---

MOEN AND COMPANYCHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

|Securities Commission Building       |            |                             
|------------------------------------ | ---------- | ----------------------------
|PO Box 10129                         | Telephone: | (604) 662-8899              
|Suite 1400  701 West Georgia Street | Fax:       | (604) 662-8809              
|Vancouver, British Columbia          | Email:     | moenandcompany@attcanada.net
|Canada V7Y 1C6                       |            |                             
|                                     |            |                             

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REVIEW REPORT

To the Directors and Shareholders of 
  Online Innovation, Inc. (A Delaware Corporation)
  (A Development Stage Company)

We have reviewed the accompanying Balance Sheets of Online Innovation, Inc.
  (A Delaware Corporation) (A Development Stage Company) as of September 30, 2003
  and September 30, 2002, and the Statements of Income, Retained Earnings (Deficit),
  Cash Flows and Stockholders Equity for the three month periods then ended.
  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and
making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Moen and Company

(Signed)

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 
  November 10, 2003

---
yrs. Violet S. C.scanhil.1, Chir!f 

3lviaion of Child. :ielfare 

cnpltol milding 

.:u;tin, l!oxss 

Ear 3%. G.roonhill: 

boordin hose, or child ylocin: aTemy, 

or other ploco for the c3ra Or OuStOdy Of 

chilir~en uni&r firt~sl year-c of age f or 

rl10 f~hzll solioilt fcnGs in this Ststc for 

e11y SCCll place or institution, sli;?ll obti?in an c~~vx.1 lionace frost the Statci 

l;oord of llaalth , vhich lScnns~ Shall bo 

iscu.ed without fw?, 2~~1 un~dor such rccsonable end uniform ruler: rrud reguLationa a3
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE0 4360A159
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF SILVER ROSE DEVELOPMENT,  INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE
RELATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### Sanborn *v.*Sanborn.

Costs, ordered as a condition of a continuance, may be properly included, by order of court, in an execution issued for tbe costs of tbe action.

If tbe title of a plaintiff fails, and he does not discontinue bis action at once, be is liable for the subsequent costs.

This was a writ of entry to foreclose a mortgage. At tbe last February term the action was continued, upon condition that tbe plaintiff should pay tbe costs of tbe term, and tax none. Tbe costs were not paid. At tbe present term, it appearing that since tbe last term tbe plaintiff’s title to tbe demanded premises bad failed, by *307reason of tbe payment of tbe mortgage debt in satisfaction of an execution issuing upon a judgment therefor, in Grafton county, tbe court directed judgment for tbe defendant for tbe costs of tbe February term, according to the order of tbe court at that term, and for the costs .of tbe present term since tbe plaintiff’s title wholly failed; to which direction tbe plaintiff excepted; and judgment having been rendered agreeably to said direction, tbe plaintiff filed this bill of exceptions, which was allowed by tbe court.

*Tenney 8?*Mason, for the plaintiff.

*Pike $ Barnard,*for tbe defendant.

Bell, C. J.

Tbe court are of opinion that questions relating to tbe allowance of costs are not open to revision at tbe law terms, unless tbe question is referred to tbe law term by the presiding justice at tbe trial term. But, if the question were open, we think tbe decision of tbe court below was correct. "Where the title of tbe plaintiff fails, and be does not discontinue bis process at once, be is clearly liable for tbe subsequent costs. Being liable to an execution for such costs, we entertain no doubt that it was proper to add tbe costs ordered as tbe terms of a continuance at tbe previous term. They are costs to which be is by law entitled, and for which such process may be issued as tbe court may deem suitable, tbe court having tbe general power to mould their process as tbe equities of tbe cases before them may require.

The ordinary process at common law for neglecting to comply with any order of court, is an attachment for contempt. We are unable to see any good reason why an execution may not be issued upon an order of court for the payment of money, as well as upon a more formal judgment. Tbe remedy by writ of execution is preferable for both parties, in point of expense and trouble.

*Exceptions overruled*— Judgment *affirmed.*
----

|          (1)     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|      (2)          | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November      14 , 2008 | By:    | /s/       Kyle      Kennedy                                         |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   | Kyle      Kennedy                                                        |   |
|                                      |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08590]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-20-2015]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 50--Long Beach, California; Notification 
of Proposed Production Activity; Mercedes Benz USA, LLC; (Accessorizing 
Motor Vehicles); Long Beach, California

    The Port of Long Beach, grantee of FTZ 50, submitted a notification 
of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of Mercedes 
Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA), located in Long Beach, California. The 
notification conforming to the requirements of the regulations of the 
FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on March 24, 2015.
    The MBUSA facility is located within Site 41 of FTZ 50. The 
facility is used for accessorizing passenger motor vehicles. Pursuant 
to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ activity would be limited to the specific 
foreign-status materials and components and specific finished products 
described in the submitted notification (as described below) and 
subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board.
    Production under FTZ procedures could exempt MBUSA from customs 
duty payments on the foreign status components used in export 
production. On its domestic sales, MBUSA would be able to choose the 
duty rate during customs entry procedures that applies to passenger 
motor vehicles (duty rate-2.5%) for the foreign status components noted 
below. Customs duties also could possibly be deferred or reduced on 
foreign status production equipment.
    The components sourced from abroad include: Plastic door sills and 
strips; wheel rim locks; metal door sills and strips; memory cards; 
navigation systems and related parts; entertainment systems; wiring 
sets and harnesses; storage compartments; spoilers; and, cup holders 
(duty rate ranges from free to 5%).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary at the 
address below. The closing period for their receipt is May 26, 2015.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
FTZ Board's Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Pierre Duy at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c7c45495e5e49026859556c585e4d4849024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eebe878b9c9c8bc0aa9b97ae9a9c8f8a8bc0898198">[email protected]</span></a> 
or (202) 482-1378.

    Dated: April 7, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08590 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>