alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-86-2014]


Production Activity Not Authorized; Foreign-Trade Zone 57--
Charlotte, North Carolina; Gildan Yarns, LLC; (Cotton, Cotton/Polyester 
Yarns); Salisbury, North Carolina

    On December 8, 2014, the Charlotte Regional Partnership, grantee of 
FTZ 57, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the 
Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Gildan Yarns, LLC, in 
Salisbury, North Carolina.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (79 FR 75532, 12-18-2014). Pursuant to 
Section 400.37, the FTZ Board has determined that further review is 
warranted and has not authorized the proposed activity. If the 
applicant wishes to seek authorization for this activity, it will need 
to submit an application for production authority, pursuant to Section 
400.23.

    Dated: April 8, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08592 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Marc C. Gordon Tamer B. Botros Leon Greenberg Professional Corporation Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2

(01 1947A ae
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-3303

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Michael James Kluge, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 1, 2012

 Filed: May 3, 2012

___________

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Kluge wassentenced to 30 yearsin prison after a jury found himguilty

of conspiracy to manufacture 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine; the trial

included the testimony of the conspiracy leader and seven coconspirators that Kluge

was part of a network of pseudoephedrine suppliers for the leader, who admitted

involvement in at least 350 grams of actual methamphetamine, see United States v.

Malloy, 614 F.3d 852, 855, 861-62 (8th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 3023

(2011). Kluge moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33

based on newly discovered evidence, undisclosed by the government, in the form of

a lab report analyzing the drugs seized from one of Kluge’s coconspirators. The
district court denied the motion and Kluge appeals, arguing that the evidence could

1

have been offered to show a general lack of purity of the methamphetamine the

conspiracy produced. 

Following careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. See United States

v. Duke, 255 F.3d 656, 659 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review). To justify a new

trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, Kluge needed to prove (1) the new

evidence was discovered after trial; (2) the failure to discover it before trial was not

attributable to a lack of due diligence; (3) the evidence was material and not merely

cumulative or impeaching; and (4) the new evidence would likely produce an

acquittal upon retrial. See United States v. Huggans, 650 F.3d 1210, 1225 (8th Cir.

2011), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1583 (2012). Even assuming the evidence in question

was material, should have been disclosed by the government, and was discovered

after trial through no lack of diligence, it was insufficient to warrant a new trial. See

id. at 1225-26 & n.8; Malloy, 614 F.3d at 855, 861-62. Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Northern District of Iowa.

-2-
Order filed February 25, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00024-CV

____________

TACHET L. WRIGHT, Appellant

V.

FOUNTAIN OAKS APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1146670

ORDER

This appeal is from a judgment signed January 7, 2020. Appellant filed a 

notice of appeal on January 7, 2020. Appellant filed a Statement of Inability to 

Afford Payment of Court Costs in the trial court. “A party who files a Statement of 

Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs cannot be required to pay costs except 

by order of the court as provided by this rule.” See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(a). 

Appellant has not been ordered to pay costs pursuant to Rule 145. 
The court reporter, Alexandra McDaniel, informed this court that appellant 

has not requested the reporter’s record be prepared and the trial court has not 

ordered that the record be prepared. We will consider and decide those issues that 

do not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of the date of 

this order, provides this court with proof that a request to prepare the reporter’s 

record has been made. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
#### *Geo. W. Smith vs. Cook*& *Norris.*

A bond given under the Trover Act of 1827, to the Sheriff, is not assignable; and the assignee of such a bond cannot sue, in his own name, on the bond.

*Before*Evans, J. *at Laurens, Fall*Term, 1841.

The plaintiff sued Cook in trover, who, with Norris, *the*other defendant, gave a bond for the delivery of the property, if the plaintiff recovered. The plaintiff did recover, and the property was not produced. The bond was taken to the Sheriff, under the Act of 1827, who assigned it to the plaintiff. The only question in the case was, whether the bond was assignable. The bond was payable to the Sheriff and his assigns ; and as it was given for the benefit of the plaintiff, the presiding Judge thought, and so decided, the action would lie.

The defendant moved for a non-suit, because the bond sued on was not assignable, so as to enable the assignee to sue on it, in his own name.

*59*Young,*for the motion. *Mr.*-, contra,

*Caria, per*

Evans, J.

By the common law, a bond was not assignable so as to authorize the assignee to bring an action in his own name. We have no general law, authorizing such actions. The Act of 1798 does not; for that, it has been decided, relates only to money bonds. In *Cobb vs.*Williams, 1 Hill, 375, the action was on a guardianship bond, given to the Commissioner in Equity, and by him assigned to the plaintiff. *Peck vs.*Glover, 1 N. & McC. was by the assignee of the Sheriff, on a prison bounds’ bond, where the defendant had been arrested on mesne process. In both these cases, it was decided, the action would not lie, because the bonds were not made assignable by any Act of the Legislature. In all cases, where the as-signee may sue in his own name, it is by virtue of some statutary regulation. The Act of 1827, under which this bond was taken, contains no such provision, and the action should have been in the Sheriff’s name. The motion for a non-suit is, therefore, granted.

J. J. EVANS.

We concur. J. S. Richardson, J. B. O’Neall, B. J. Earle, A. P. Butler.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19328-19329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning

[[Page 19329]]

individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: May 7, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Peter Zelazowski, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH 6100 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6902, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adddc8d9c8df83d7c8c1ccd7c2dadec6c4edc3c4c583cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="166673627364386c737a776c7961657d7f56787f7e38717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 7, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-08294 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Reclamation

          - [RR83550000, 156R5065C6, RX.59389832.1009676]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of an additional proposed contract action pending through December 2015. This notice is in addition to the Quarterly Status Report of Water Service, Repayment, and Other Water-Related Contract Actions which was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 20, 2015 (80 FR 2727).                    

# ADDRESSES:

Information pertaining to the additional contract proposal may be obtained by calling or writing the Pacific Northwest Region, Bureau of Reclamation, Ephrata Field Office, P.O. Box 815, Ephrata, Washington 98823; telephone (509) 754-0227.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle Kelly, Reclamation Law Administration Division, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, Colorado 80225-0007; telephone 303-445-2888.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following information is added to the list of proposed or amendatory contract actions in the Pacific Northwest Region:

10. East Columbia Basin Irrigation District (District), Columbia Basin Project, Washington: Long-term contract to renew master water service contract No. 14-06-100-9165, as supplemented, to authorize the District to deliver a base quantity of up to 90,000 acre-feet of Columbia Basin Project water annually to up to 30,000 First Phase Continuation Acres located within the District, and continue delivery of additional water to land irrigated under the District's repayment contract during the peak period of irrigation water use annually.

                    Except for the above addition, the January 20, 2015,                     **Federal Register**                     notice remains the same.                

      ( print page 20012)    
Dated: March 3, 2015.

Roseann Gonzales,

Director, Policy and Administration.

[FR Doc. 2015-08596 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4332-90-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2003 and as amended on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Hassan M. Ahmed, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|                      | /s/  Hassan M. Ahmed                                                                            |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Hassan  M. Ahmed                                                                                |
| Date:  June 10, 2005 | *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of  Directors (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

1

----
2021 AFSAM

Conaway Cup Challenge

CT5160

SHOOTER TEAM SCORE ROST # STATE\COUNTRY 

ALL-GUARD (ALPHA) 584 1

1 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 120 ND

2 SFC NOE, JOSEPH T 119 AR

3 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 118 AR

4 SFC SWANSON, BRANDON N 100 WI

ALL-GUARD (BRAVO) 546 2

1 SSG DEMENT, JERRY D 316 MO

2 SSG VARGAS, ERIK J 132 CA

3 SSGT ROOK, GAVIN W 121 ND

4 TSGT DANIEL, SCOTTY W 138 AR

USAR BLACK 506 3

1 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 162 USAR

2 SGT HUGHES, DEVIN E 158 USAR

3 SSG MORRIS, SEAN D 159 USAR

4 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 161 USAR

USAR GOLD 498 4

1 CW3 KNOTE, ANDY T 163 USAR

2 SFC GODEL, JASON W 156 USAR

3 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 157 USAR

4 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 160 USAR

ALL-GUARD (CHARLIE) 484 5

1 SFC BAUTISTA, MICHAEL R 125 ID

2 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 131 CO

3 MSG GREGSON, JACOB J 108 UT

4 MSG SMITH, MATTHEW B 136 AR

Saturday, September 4, 2021 Time printed: 08:44:17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.3




       Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
Financial Federal Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-3 ("Registration Statement") of Financial Federal
Corporation of our report dated September 30, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of Financial Federal Corporation and
subsidiaries ("Financial Federal") as of July 31, 2003 and 2002, and
the related consolidated income statements, statements of
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-
year period ended July 31, 2003, which report is included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Financial Federal for the year ended
July 31, 2003 and to the reference to our firm under the heading
"Experts" in the Registration Statement.  The consolidated statements
of stockholders' equity, income and cash flows of Financial Federal
Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended July 31, 2001 were
audited by other auditors who have ceased operations.  Those auditors
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements in
their report dated August 31, 2001.



/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
August 12, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6230

ANTONIO S. FLAX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusMICHELLE B. MITCHELL, Sheriff; JERRY MIDDLETON, Major; DON EDWARD PHILLIPS; GEORGE FISHER, Deputy Sheriff; DEPUTY SHERIFF PARRISH; SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND; ELLERY D. LUNDY, Deputy; MICHAEL EAMES, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-97-387) Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio S. Flax, Appellant Pro Se. Anton Joseph Stelly, THOMPSON, SMITHERS, NEWMAN & WADE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(c)(1), (c)(3) (1994). 2 PER CURIAM: Antonio S. Flax appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Flax v. Mitchell, No. CA-97-387 (E.D. Va. Jan. 20, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6230

ANTONIO S. FLAX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHELLE B. MITCHELL, Sheriff; JERRY MIDDLETON, Major; DON EDWARD PHILLIPS; GEORGE

FISHER, Deputy Sheriff; DEPUTY SHERIFF

PARRISH; SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF

RICHMOND; ELLERY D. LUNDY, Deputy; MICHAEL

EAMES, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-97-387)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio S. Flax, Appellant Pro Se. Anton Joseph Stelly, THOMPSON,

SMITHERS, NEWMAN & WADE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(c)(1), (c)(3) (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio S. Flax appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.* We

have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the magistrate judge. See Flax v. Mitchell, No. CA-97-387 (E.D.

Va. Jan. 20, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
OREGON ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (ORARNG) DRINKING WATER PFAS 

SNAPSHOT 

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at the 

Lane County AFRC, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army 

National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water 

Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the 

American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to 

ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: August 2023

PFOA + PFOS Results: 2.5 ppt

Future Testing Event: Summer 2025

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Oregon National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 971-355-3530

Office E-mail Address: OMD_PublicAffairs@omd.oregon.gov

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
2023 AFSAM

Conaway Cup Challenge

CT5120

SHOOTER TEAM SCORE ROST # STATE\COUNTRY 

ALL GUARD ALPHA 597 1

1 SSG FULMER, MICAH N 116 CO

2 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 108 AR

3 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 110 ND

4 1SG CAPPS, JOSEPH A 111 AR

ALL GUARD BRAVO 564 2

1 SFC ARCHAMBAULT, MAX 117 VT

2 SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 152 CO

3 SFC STAATS, JOHN A 118 AR

4 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 119 CO

USAR GOLD 557 3

1 SFC WILLIS, RICHARD 135 KY

2 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 134 ID

3 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 133 CO

4 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 132 HI

BAROST RED 542 4

1 SSG CATT, KEVIN 122 UK

2 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 121 UK

3 SGT COLGAN, JOHNATHON 139 UK

4 WO1 DOUGLAS, JAMES 120 UK

BAROST WHITE 539 5

1 LCPL BURGESS, MARCUS 129 UK

2 MAJOR ROSIE, LANCE 123 UK

3 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 138 UK

4 LCPL FERGUSON, ANDREW 128 UK

US MARINE CORPS 520 6

1 SGT FLEITAS, NICKOLAS 103

2 SGT MULLER, SHAUN P 102 VA

3 SSG STEWART, JUDE O 100 VA

4 GYSGT RANTON, CHAD W 101 VA

NETHERLANDS 452 7

1 PVT DOPPERT, SANTINO 112 NETHERLANDS

2 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX 113 NETHERLANDS

3 CPL BUSSTRA, MARTIJN 114 NETHERLANDS

4 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 115 NETHERLANDS Honors Only

Saturday, May 6, 2023 Page 1 of 2 Time printed: 17:24:52
SHOOTER TEAM SCORE ROST # STATE\COUNTRY 

COAST GUARD 364 8

1 E-5 LUSH, TRAVIS C 105 VA

2 SFC BOLANOS, STEVEN L 104 CA

3 E5 DUERR, DAVID C 107 CA

4 SFC PHELPS, STEFAN S 106 VA

Saturday, May 6, 2023 Page 2 of 2 Time printed: 17:24:52
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, Moshe BenBassat, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarter ended March 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
ClickSoftware Technologies Ltd..


                                    By:     /s/ MOSHE BENBASSAT
                                            -------------------
                                    Name:   Moshe BenBassat
                                    Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer







                                       31