alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Deltic Timber Corporation
(the report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth D. Mann, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | (1) | the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerMarch 4, 2011




/s/Kenneth D. MannKenneth D. MannChief Financial OfficerMarch 4, 2011
.)

.

Hon. Stewart Hellman

CPiminelDistrict AttOPn8y Tarrent Cduntg Fort Worth, Texas opl.nlon NO. v-1343 Re: Authority of the County Treasurer to establish ti petty cash fund for .~ I ,:the purpose of cashing Dear Sir: jury warianta. '!; Yo~&~wquest for.our oplnloa 1s substsntlall~ as follows:

May the County Trees&P of ‘Parrant County establish andmaintain a potty cash fund for the purpose of~cashlngJuly warrants that have been Issuedby theDistrict Clerk and countersignedby the Traasuror? Article 2554,V.C.S., providea in part: "It shallbe the duty of the county treasurer upon the presentation to him of any waPrant, check, vouch4r, or order drawn by the proper authority, lf there be fund8 sufficient for the payment thereof on deposit in ,theaccount against which such war- .$a& is drawn, to endo-%ae upon the f6ce of such Fnstrumenthis order to pas the same to the payee named thoreln and to charae the same on his books to th i d hi

(Emphaalsazdo$. "On w ' h it is drawn." The county treasures is not authorized to draw a check upon th4 county deposltow and take up a warrant drawn by the proper authority. It 1s the duty of the county treasurer to endorse the warrant a8 prescrlbgdby Article 2554 and deliver It to the payso, and the payee should present the warrant to the deosltorg for payment. Att'y Gen. Op. O-4462 (1942). Further, there is no express or~implied authority forHon. StewartHollman, Page 2' (v-1343 1

the county treasurer to withdrawmoneys from the jury 

# L fund in the county depository.

The onlymethod ofpayiag jurywarrantsbeing that prescribed laArticle 2554, we agree.wlthgotithat -t~h8 county treasurer cannot establish a petty cash fund SOP thepurpose OS cashing jU??y WarPaQtS. SUMMARY ,r The county treasurer ofTarrant County ishot authorized to establish a potty cash fund SOP the purpose of cashing jury warrants. APPROVRD: YOUrS V8I'ytruly, J. C. Davis, Jr. PRICE DANIEL County AffairsDlvlslon Attornoy;General Jesse P. Luton, Jr. Reviewing Assistant CharlesD. Mathelk First Assistant Assistant RRR:wah
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION — NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

Nos. 00-2075 00-2259 JORGE MACIAS, Plaintiff, Appellee,

v. FURNITURE SERVICES, INC., ET AL., Defendants, Appellants.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jaime Pieras, Jr., Senior U.S. District Judge ] Before Selya, Boudin, and Lynch, Circuit Judges . Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth , with whom Re ppert, Kelly & Wohlgemuth, LLP was on brief, for appellants. Jul ian R. Rivera-Aspinall , with whom Rivera-Aspinall, Garriga & Fernandini, P.S.C. was on brief, for appellee.
April 25, 2001-2- Per Curiam . These appeals stem from a dispute between defendant-appellant Furniture Services, Inc. (FSI) and plaintiff-appellee Joseph Macias, formerly FSI's exclusive sales representat ive in Puerto Rico. When FSI terminated the arrangement, Macias invoked diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), and sued FSI (along with several related persons and firms) for damages in the federal district court.

The district court, acting withcommendable dispatch, set trial for June 19, 2000. In the period from June 9 to June 15, the court attempted to broker a settlement. The judge believed that his efforts had borne fruit, and, accordingly, entered a judgment of dismissal. The scheduled trial did not transpire. FSI promptly moved to vacate the judgment. Macias acquiesced and urged the court to restore the case to the trial calendar. The district judge nonetheless denied the motion to vacate. We have carefully considered the record, the parties' briefs, and the attorneys' statements during oral argument. We are persuaded that the district court, in good faith, misunderstood the representations of FSI's counsel, and that the court therefore entered judgment based on a mistaken premise. Ajudgment resting on a clear mistake of fact, seasonably called to the trial court's attention, cannot be allowed to stand.-3-

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand the case for trial.

Vacated and remanded . No costs .
762 October 25, 2023 No. 561

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF OREGON

In the Matter of A. O., 

a Youth.

STATE OF OREGON,

Respondent,

v.

A. O.,

Appellant.

Malheur County Circuit Court

21JU05711; A178476

Erin K. Landis, Judge.

On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed 

September 19, 2023. Opinion filed September 13, 2023. 328 

Or App 187.

Christa Obold Eshleman and Youth, Rights & Justice 

filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, 

Solicitor General, and Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant 

Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and 

Pagan, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; former nonprecedential decision 

reissued as precedential opinion; reversed and remanded.
Cite as 328 Or App 762 (2023) 763

PER CURIAM

Youth appeals a judgment finding him within the 

jurisdiction of the juvenile court because he committed acts 

that, if he were an adult, would constitute minor in possession of alcohol, a Class B violation. ORS 471.430.1

 The court 

found youth within its jurisdiction after applying a “preponderance of the evidence” standard of proof. Although a 

“violation proceeding” conducted pursuant to ORS 153.076 

requires that the state need only prove “the charged violation by a preponderance of the evidence,” the parties agree 

that that is not the case in a juvenile delinquency proceeding. Moreover, the parties agree that the trial court plainly 

erred in applying the incorrect standard. We agree and 

accept the state’s concession.

Under ORS 419C.400(2), “[t]he facts alleged in the 

petition showing the youth to be within the jurisdiction of 

the court as provided in ORS 419C.005, unless admitted, 

must be established beyond a reasonable doubt.” There is no 

provision in the juvenile code for applying a lesser standard 

where the act committed by the youth otherwise would be 

considered a violation rather than a crime. We exercise our 

discretion to correct the error, given the gravity of the error.

Reconsideration allowed; former nonprecedential 

decision reissued as precedential opinion; reversed and 

remanded.

1 This opinion originally issued as a nonprecedential memorandum disposition. State v. A. O., 328 Or App 107 (2023) (nonprecedential memorandum opinion). Pursuant to ORAP 6.25(1)(f) and 10.30(1)(e), youth has requested that we 

reconsider the opinion solely for the purpose of changing that designation and 

reissuing it as a precedential opinion. We agree that this opinion should be designated as precedential. Other than this footnote and the disposition of the motion 

being added to the tagline, this opinion is identical to the nonprecedential one 

that previously issued.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. ALEJ AN DRO Y LI Z AGU I RR E, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 50226 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 8 - c r - 0 3 0 5 8 - D MS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D a naM . S abr a w , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A l e j a ndr o Y l i z A gui rr e appe a l s f r om hi s c onvi c t i on f

orva r i ous drug o f f e n s e s . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. A gu i rr e c on t ends thatthe di stri ctcourt ’ s i nstruct i on t o the grand j ury v io la te d th e F if

th A m e n d m e n t b yim p r o p e r lylim itin g th e g r a n dju ry ’s d is c r e tio n . 

# FI LED MA R 09 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50226 2 T h i s co n t en t i o n fai l s b ecau se th e i n stru ct i o n s h ere su b st an t i al l y m i rro red th o se appr ove d i n U

n i ted S ta tes v. C o rtez-R i vera , 45 4 F . 3d 10 38 , 10 40 (9th C i r. 20 06 ), a nd U ni te d State s v . N

av arr o- V ar gas , 40 8 F . 3d 11 84 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( en banc). AF F I RME D.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3729 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3729

To amend section 31 of the Small Business Act with respect to awarding 
 contract opportunities to qualified HUBZone small business concerns, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2009

  Mr. Herger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 31 of the Small Business Act with respect to awarding 
 contract opportunities to qualified HUBZone small business concerns, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AWARDING CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES.

    Section 31(b)(2)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
657a(b)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3770 

To make technical corrections to subtitle A of title VII of the Consolidated 

Natural Resources Act of 2008, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Ms. BORDALLO (for herself, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. 

FALEOMAVAEGA, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. PIERLUISI, Mr. BOREN, Mr. 

WILSON of South Carolina, and Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, 

and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To make technical corrections to subtitle A of title VII of 

the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY. 

4 Not later than 30 days after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall submit 

6 to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of 

7 Representatives and the Committee on Energy and NatVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:29 Oct 09, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3770.IH H3770

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3770 IH

1 ural Resources of the Senate a report on the economic sit2 uation in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Is3 lands and the effect of the amendments made by subtitle 

4 A of title VII of the Consolidated Natural Resources Act 

5 of 2008 on the future economic situation of the Common6 wealth. 

7 SEC. 2. NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS VISITOR ENTRY 

8 PROGRAM TRANSITION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 705(b) 

10 of the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 (48 

11 U.S.C. 1806(b)), the amendments made by section 702(b) 

12 of such Act shall take effect on the date that is 1 year 

13 after the transition program effective date described in 

14 section 6(a) of Public Law 94–241 (48 U.S.C. 1806(a)) 

15 (as added by section 702(a) of the Consolidated Natural 

16 Resources Act of 2008). In a case in which the transition 

17 program effective date has been modified under paragraph 

18 (3) of such section 6(a) before the date of the enactment 

19 of this Act, such amendments shall take effect on the date 

20 that is 1 year after the modified date. 

21 (b) TREATMENT OF CNMI VISITOR ENTRY PRO22 GRAM.—During the 1-year period referred to in subsection 

23 (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall administer 

24 the visitor entry program of the Commonwealth of the 

25 Northern Mariana Islands consistent with the provisions 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3770 IH

1 of Commonwealth law governing the program that were 

2 in effect on the day before the commencement of such pe3 riod. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
SERVED : APRI L8 , 201 1 : -J^TMEN TO F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N; bPORlATiO M OFFIC EO FHEARING S ' ^'" i OPcRATlON S WASHINGTON , D C



### 'r:^ ../ R 

### ! i A!0 : 

### 2 2 INTH EMATTERO F DIAMON D AI RCHARTER , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10EA000 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2010-062 0 ORDE RO FCHIE FADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDG E In vie w o f

th e impendin g prospectiv e laps e i nFY201 1 appropriation s fundin g governmen t

operation s a s o f

Apri l 8 , 2011 , th e Departmen t ha s directe dtha t

al l employee s i n th e Offic e o f Hearing s wil l b e furloughe di nth e even t o f suc halapse . Accordingly , i nth e even t o f suc halapse , th e Offic e o f Hearing s wil l clos e o nFriday , Apri l 8 , 2011 , for th e duratio no f

th e shutdown . An y deadline , whethe r

se t b y regulatio no r

previou s order , i s suspende dan dextende dfo r th e duratio n o f

th e shutdown . S O ORDERED .

Ronni e A . Yoder / Chie f Administrativ e L a Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

### (CiviVlP . aCPlOE^ f

^ Federa l Aviatio n Administration I 80 0 fejj^jesndence Avenue , S.W . ^Washington , D C 2059 1 i Attention : Hearin g Docket Clerk , Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g Gregor y S . Winton , Respondent' s CourOt^'', ' ,Si ^ ^N ' i \ 

### iThe Aviaftio

n La w Fir m jOn e Res^M ^ Court , Suit

e 45 0 kockviMbi ^ 2085 0 I m ^ |pi|4-855 0 fA3C>-^P^4.252 5

- :-..•-•'.•• • a s 

### l^acharyM , Berman , Complainant' s Cow ^ Ikttomey , Offic e o f

th e Regiona

l Counse| , ^^fi^SiS i Administratio n I Aviati<aiPlaz a |amaica,N y U43 4 tEL ; 718-553-325 8 |AX : 718-995-569 9 th e HoniCttlibl

e Ronni e A . Yoder , I Chief Adjmnistrative La

w Judg e IJ.S . Dqialacasm

l o f Transportatio n . . Qffice of#6ttngs , M-20 , RoomElr2-32q ' ^ i t o Newftese y Avenue , S.E . lashing^ , D C 2059 0 U A2^^66-214 2 202^66-753 6

' Servic e i)i$t> y U.S . Mail . For servic e if i p A^tiQ n /^ll^iy^tnition , 600 Independenc e Ayefi^' 154t0591 ; ^kJ^cm : Hearing Docket Cleik , AG <
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Linens ’n Things Center, Inc. for the fiscal  year ended December 30, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Robert J. DiNicola, as Chief Executive Officer of Linens ’nThings Center, Inc., and Francis M. Rowan, as Chief FinancialOfficer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofhis knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Linens ’nThings Center, Inc.

 
| /s/ Robert J.  DiNicola |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| **Name:**               |   | Robert J. DiNicola |
| **Title:**              |   | Chairman and Chief |
|                    |   | Executive Officer |
| **Date:**               |   | March 26, 2007 |
| ** **              |   |   |
| ** **              |   |   |
| /s/ Francis M.  Rowan   |   |
| **Name:**               |   | Francis M. Rowan |
| **Title:**              |   | Senior Vice President and |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| **Date:**               |   | March 26, 2007 |
|                         |        |  |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick J. Caruso, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                     |  |  |  | 
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Date: January 26, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    NICK J.
CARUSO                                              
|                       |  |     |  | Nick J. Caruso Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynegy Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Dynegy Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of eGene, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report for the period ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Udo
Henseler, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Jeffrey
Williams, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated: May 11, 2005       By: /s/ Udo Henseler
                              Udo Henseler
                              Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
                              Officer

Dated: May 11, 2005       By: /s/ Jeffrey Williams
                              Jeffrey Williams
                              Chief Financial Officer
# Massachusetts Guardsman Wins CENTCOM Innovation Contest

/ Published Dec. 28, 2022

WASHINGTON - Before deploying this summer with his Massachusetts Army National Guard unit, Sgt. Mickey Reeve had little idea he’d be on a world tour just a few months later talking about innovation in the military.

However, that’s where he found himself after winning the U.S. Central Command’s Innovation Oasis contest this fall for his counter-unmanned aerial system training software.

The tool simulates U.S. military c-UAS operating systems allowing operators to train with adjustable scenarios and locations. The customizable trainer can be used by teams to sharpen reaction time, refine engagement drills and streamline communications.

“This tool will potentially have the ability to influence operators to become more proficient at their jobs, which could positively impact the mission and save lives,” Reeve said. “I think it is going to be a massive benefit to our organization.”

For CENTCOM, the contest was a way to find a practical idea to help the joint force and inspire change across the command.

“This program is about building a culture of innovation across all of CENTCOM,” said Gen. Michael Kurilla, commander of CENTCOM. “It’s about finding those great ideas hidden from view inside a squad, trapped inside of a ship, locked down in a cubicle in one of our bases, or tucked away in an aircraft hangar. We want to unlock, embrace, and then uplift those ideas and then implement them across the entire organization.”

Reeve came up with the winning idea while assigned to the Prince Sultan Air Base counter UAS team. Noticing a training gap within their simulators, he used his programming background to find a solution.

“I’m somebody that’s always had that work-oriented mindset, and I’m always craving that next thing to do,” he said. “This was a great opportunity for me to provide that outlet and to work on a solution that I found for my base.”

After seeing flyers for Innovation Oasis, he decided to enter and spent hours refining a functional prototype for his pitch. Thanks to the help from those around him, the Interim Platform Agnostic Counter-Unmanned Aircraft System Trainer was born.

“My team did a fantastic job of supporting me the entire way,” he said. “None of this would’ve been possible without them.”

CENTCOM awarded Reeve the Defense Meritorious Service Medal for winning Innovation Oasis. He also can attend the military school of his choice during the calendar year.

After the selection, Reeve went on a tour of Washington, D.C. and the Middle East to promote his idea and innovation throughout CENTCOM. 

“The ideas are out there and they’re good ideas,” he said. “We have a tremendous talent pool throughout our organization.”

Army Futures Command’s Software Factory will work on bringing Reeve’s idea to the field.

With the success of the first Innovation Oasis, CENTCOM is planning for another contest this spring.