alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3230 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3230

 To require the establishment of a working group to evaluate the food 
    safety threat posed by beef imported from Brazil, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2021

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the establishment of a working group to evaluate the food 
    safety threat posed by beef imported from Brazil, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WORKING GROUP ON BEEF IMPORTED FROM BRAZIL.

    (a) Establishment of Working Group.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall 
        establish a working group--
                    (A) to evaluate the food safety threat posed by 
                beef and beef products imported from Brazil; and
                    (B) to make recommendations to the Secretary with 
                respect to whether the importation of beef and beef 
                products from Brazil into the United States should be 
                permitted.
            (2) Membership.--The Secretary shall ensure that the 
        working group established under paragraph (1) includes--
                    (A) experts on food safety; and
                    (B) representatives of U.S. Customs and Border 
                Protection and other Federal agencies with 
                responsibilities relating to international trade.
    (b) Temporary Suspension of Imports.--Beef and beef products 
imported from Brazil may not enter the United States during the 
period--
            (1) beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) ending on the date on which the working group 
        established under subsection (a)(1) submits to the Secretary 
        the recommendations required by subparagraph (B) of that 
        subsection.
                                 <all>
```
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


Contact:    Steven F. Groth, Chief Financial Officer
            (212) 599-8000



        FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION CALLS ITS 4.5%
        CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED NOTES FOR REDEMPTION
        ---------------------------------------------


NEW YORK, NY:  July 25, 2002 - Financial Federal Corporation
("FIF"  -  NYSE)  announced today that  it  is  calling  for
redemption   all   $91,188,000  of  its   outstanding   4.5%
convertible subordinated notes.  Holders of the  notes  have
until the redemption date of August 16, 2002 to present  and
surrender  their notes.  Holders have the option to  receive
cash  equal  to  101.929% of the principal amount  of  their
notes (includes a 1.929% call premium) plus accrued interest
to,  but  excluding, the redemption date or 33.16 shares  of
the  Company's  common stock for each  $1,000  of  principal
amount  of their notes (a conversion price of $30.15625  per
share).


Financial   Federal  Corporation  specializes  in  financing
industrial  and  commercial  equipment  through  installment
sales  and  leasing programs for manufacturers, dealers  and
end  users  nationwide.  For additional information,  please
visit the Company's website at www.financialfederal.com.


This document contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform  Act  of
1995  and are subject to risks and uncertainties that  could
cause   actual  results  to  differ  materially  from  those
contained  in the forward-looking statements.   Readers  are
referred  to the most recent reports on Forms 10-K and  10-Q
filed  by  the  Company  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission that identify such risks and uncertainties.


                             ###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          25,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,570
<PP&E>                                           4,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,135
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,736
<SALES>                                          7,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,819
<CGS>                                            2,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,088)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley      Act of 2002**

**(i)**
**(ii)**

|                                | **WESTSTAR                FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION** |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |                                                       |   |
|                                |                                                       |   |
| Date:                August 8, 2006 | By:                                                        | /s/                Randall C. Hall |
|                                |                                                       |   |
|                                |                                                       | Randall                C. Hall |
|                                |                                                       | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial |
|                                |                                                       | and                Principal Accounting Officer |
# Úřední věstník C 27/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 27 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 6625. ledna 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 27

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 6625. ledna 2023

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informace |
| | INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE |
| | Evropská komise |
| 2023/C 27/01 | Směnné kurzy vůči euru – 24. ledna 2023 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

2023/C 27/01

Směnné kurzy vůči euru – 24. ledna 2023

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

IV Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

| 25.1.2023 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2023

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 27/1

---

Směnné kurzy vůči euru (1)

24. ledna 2023

(2023/C 27/01)

1 euro =

| | měna | směnný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | americký dolar | 1,0858 |
| JPY | japonský jen | 141,47 |
| DKK | dánská koruna | 7,4399 |
| GBP | britská libra | 0,88368 |
| SEK | švédská koruna | 11,0995 |
| CHF | švýcarský frank | 1,0053 |
| ISK | islandská koruna | 156,10 |
| NOK | norská koruna | 10,7193 |
| BGN | bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | česká koruna | 23,874 |
| HUF | maďarský forint | 397,33 |
| PLN | polský zlotý | 4,7130 |
| RON | rumunský lei | 4,9171 |
| TRY | turecká lira | 20,4234 |
| AUD | australský dolar | 1,5470 |
| CAD | kanadský dolar | 1,4517 |
| HKD | hongkongský dolar | 8,5014 |
| NZD | novozélandský dolar | 1,6743 |
| SGD | singapurský dolar | 1,4337 |
| KRW | jihokorejský won | 1 341,60 |
| ZAR | jihoafrický rand | 18,7687 |
| CNY | čínský juan | 7,3642 |
| IDR | indonéská rupie | 16 259,05 |
| MYR | malajsijský ringgit | 4,6448 |
| PHP | filipínské peso | 59,122 |
| RUB | ruský rubl | |
| THB | thajský baht | 35,609 |
| BRL | brazilský real | 5,6164 |
| MXN | mexické peso | 20,4603 |
| INR | indická rupie | 88,6235 |

měna

směnný kurz

USD

americký dolar

1,0858

JPY

japonský jen

141,47

DKK

dánská koruna

7,4399

GBP

britská libra

0,88368

SEK

švédská koruna

11,0995

CHF

švýcarský frank

1,0053

ISK

islandská koruna

156,10

NOK

norská koruna

10,7193

BGN

bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

česká koruna

23,874

HUF

maďarský forint

397,33

PLN

polský zlotý

4,7130

RON

rumunský lei

4,9171

TRY

turecká lira

20,4234

AUD

australský dolar

1,5470

CAD

kanadský dolar

1,4517

HKD

hongkongský dolar

8,5014

NZD

novozélandský dolar

1,6743

SGD

singapurský dolar

1,4337

KRW

jihokorejský won

1 341,60

ZAR

jihoafrický rand

18,7687

CNY

čínský juan

7,3642

IDR

indonéská rupie

16 259,05

MYR

malajsijský ringgit

4,6448

PHP

filipínské peso

59,122

RUB

ruský rubl

THB

thajský baht

35,609

BRL

brazilský real

5,6164

MXN

mexické peso

20,4603

INR

indická rupie

88,6235

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenční směnné kurzy jsou publikovány ECB.

---
<PAGE> 1


            Report of Independent Public Accountants


To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated financial statements of Household
Finance Corporation (the "Company") and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and have issued our report thereon dated
January 14, 2000.  We have not audited any financial statements
of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to
December 31, 1999, or performed any audit procedures subsequent
to the date of our report on those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that
caused us to believe that the Company was not in compliance with
any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or conditions of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated November
1, 1995, in conjunction with the Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset
Backed Certificates Series 1995-2 insofar as they relate to
accounting matters.  It should be noted, however, that our audit
was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such
noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of the
Company's system of internal accounting controls over the
Company's home equity loan portfolio, including those loans
serviced under the Agreement to the extent we considered
necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally
accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with these standards,
the purpose of our study and evaluation, which included obtaining
an understanding of the accounting systems, was to determine the
nature, timing and extent of the auditing procedures necessary
for expressing an opinion on the financial statements.  Our study
and evaluation also took into consideration certain of the
criteria and audit requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits of
Non-Supervised Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing
and Urban Development.  However, certain procedures included in
the audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans being
serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records relating
to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that, in our
opinion, Section 3.10 of the Agreement required us to report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the
Board of Directors and management of the Company and should not
be used for any other purpose.



Chicago, Illinois
January 14, 2000
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7726

FLOYD JOYNER, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CARL EDWARD EASON, JR., Judge,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:14-cv-01147-LO-IDD)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Joyner, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Joyner, Sr., appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that 

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Joyner v. Eason, 

No. 1:14-cv-01147-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2014). We deny 

Joyner’s motions to appoint counsel and for bail or release 

pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7643

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HUMBERTO DIMAS-GARCIA, a/k/a Tito,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (2:10-cr-01104-RMG-8; 2:14-cv-01069-RMG)

Submitted: April 28, 2015 Decided: May 5, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Humberto Dimas-Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nicholas 

Bianchi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Peter Thomas 

Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South 

Carolina, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Humberto Dimas-Garcia seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Dimas-Garcia has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Doane Pet Care Company (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I,
Philip K. Woodlief, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ PHILIP K. WOODLIEF
Philip K. WoodliefVice President and Chief Financial OfficerDoane Pet Care CompanyMarch 11, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> 
(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. 

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation     General Partner

/S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________Name: Kelly TucekTitle: Vice President of the General Partner and         principal financial officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.Date: March 26, 2004
10.1 EMA Amendment




Exhibit 10.1


Amendment to the
EMPLOYEE MATTERS AGREEMENT
by and between
CONOCOPHILLIPS and PHILLIPS 66,
dated as of April 26, 2012


WHEREAS, ConocoPhillips, a Delaware corporation (“COP”), and Phillips 66, a Delaware corporation (“Phillips 66”), entered into that certain Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of  April 26, 2012 (the “EMA”); and


WHEREAS, COP and Phillips 66 reserved the right under Section 13.9 to amend the EMA by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of COP and Phillips 66;


NOW, THEREFORE, COP and Phillips 66 do hereby amend Section 5.2(b)(v) of the EMA, effective December 5, 2012, by replacing the fourth and fifth sentences thereof with the following two sentences which shall read as follows:


“Such earnings or losses shall be determined by combining (x) the actual rate of return of the COP Pension Plan for the period commencing on the Distribution Date and ending on the last date prior to the Final Transfer Date for which actual performance data is available from the COP Pension Plan trustee (the “Latest Actual Performance Date”), and (y) the estimated rate of return of the COP Pension Plan (the “Estimated Return”)  for the period commencing on the day following the Latest Actual Performance Date and ending on the date that is as close as administratively practicable to the Final Transfer Date.   The Estimated Return shall be based on the following amounts:  (1)  actual market value of assets for the COP Pension Plan as of the Latest Actual Performance Date; (2) daily market values from the COP Pension Plan trustee for those assets that are directly held in custody by the trustee; (3) daily market values from commingled funds that provide daily valuation for fund units owned by the COP Pension Plan; and (4) estimated daily market values for commingled funds that do not provide daily valuation for fund units owned by the COP Pension Plan, with such estimated daily market values based on the performance of the benchmark index for that specific commingled fund.”  




[Signature Page Follows]

Page 1 of 2




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COP and Phillips 66 have each caused this Amendment to be executed in their names by a duly authorized officer as of the date first written above.




	
			
	CONOCOPHILLIPS

	By:
	/s/ J.W. Sheets

	 
	Name:
	J.W. Sheets

	 
	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	PHILLIPS 66

	By:
	/s/ Brian Wenzel

	 
	Name:
	Brian Wenzel 

	 
	Title:
	VP & Treasurer






                

Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

h0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148059

STATE TREASURER,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148059

COA: 318131

Genesee CC: 12

- 099423

- CZ

DAVID K. HUTCHESON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we ar e not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
12:00 P.M.

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

April Crop Production

Executive Summary

Lance Honig, Chief

Crops Branch

April 10, 2018
USDA-NASS

4-10-18

Field Crops Fruit & Nuts Specialty Crops

Citrus

Contents
USDA-NASS

4-10-18

Objective Measurement Row Count

Survey Type Field Measurement Field Observation

Crops Included Oranges Oranges, Grapefruit, Late 

Tangerines and Tangelos

Sample Size 804 Groves 78,741 Rows

Collection Period March 19-26 March 27-28

Survey Overview

Florida Citrus
USDA-NASS

4-10-18

April 2018 Crop Production

% Change % Change

From From

Crop Unit April Previous Previous

2018 Forecast Season 

Production

Oranges Mil Tons 3.90 +0.3 -23.4

Grapefruit Thou Tons 558 +5.3 -20.1

Tangerines & 

Mandarins Thou Tons 877 -0.6 -15.1

Lemons Thou Tons 872 +0.2 -1.6
13.7

9.82

13.0

12.2 12.4

11.5

12.9

9.25 9.02

7.63

10.1

9.13

8.24

8.91 8.98

8.27

6.77

6.35 6.09

5.09

3.90

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

Million Tons

Orange Production

United States

USDA-NASS

4-10-18
USDA-NASS

4-10-18

Release Date Report Title

April 20 Cattle on Feed

April 27 Agricultural Prices

May 1 CAIR: Cotton System, Fats & Oils, Flour Millings, and Grain

Crushings

May 10 Cotton Ginnings - Annual

Crop Production

Upcoming Reports
USDA NASS Data Users’ 

Meeting

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

University of Chicago – Gleacher Center 

450 North Cityfront Plaza Drive 

Chicago, Illinois 60611 

312-464-8787

USDA-NASS

4-10-18
USDA-NASS

4-10-18
United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

202-720-2127

800-727-9540

nass@nass.usda.gov