19964 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices 

1See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip from the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 72624 (December 8, 

2014) (Preliminary Results). 

2See ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, 

Sheet and Strip from the United Arab Emirates (A– 

520–803); Case Briefof JBF RAK, LLC,’’ dated 

January 14, 2015 and ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate 

(PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United 

ArabEmirates: Petitioners’ Case BriefCite briefs’’ 

dated January 15, 2015. 

3See ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, 

Sheet and Strip from the United Arab Emirates (A– 

520–803); Rebuttal Brief of JBF RAK, LLC,’’ dated 

January 20, 2015. 

4See Memorandum to Mark Hoadley, ‘‘Final 

Analysis Memorandum for JBF RAK LLC,’’ April 7, 

2015. 

5The Department applied the assessment rate 

calculation method adopted in Antidumping 

Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average 

Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 

FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). 

152. Zhejiang Changxing Guangming Special 

Refractory Material Foundry, Co., Ltd. 

153. Zhejiang Deqing Jinlei Refractory Co., 

Ltd. 

154. Zhejiang Huzhou Fuzilin Refractory 

Metals Group Co., Ltd. 

155. Zhengzhou Annec Industrial Co., Ltd. 

156. Zhengzhou Huachen Refractory Co., Ltd. 

157. Zhengzhou Huawei Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

158. Zibo Lianzhu Refractory Materials Co., 

Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08591 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–520–803] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab 

Emirates: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 8, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film (PET 

Film) from the United Arab Emirates.1

This review covers one producer/

exporter of subject merchandise, JBF 

RAK LLC (JBF). Based on our analysis 

of the comments and information 

received, we made changes to the 

Preliminary Results, which are 

discussed below. The final weightedaverage dumping margin is listed below 

in the section titled ‘‘Final Results of 

Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective Date: April 14, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4261. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 8, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results. 

Since the Preliminary Results, the 

following events have taken place: The 

Department received timely case briefs 

from JBF on January 14, 2015, and from 

DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi 

Polyester Film, Inc., and SKC, Inc., 

(collectively, Petitioners) on January 15, 

2015.2 JBF filed a timely rebuttal brief 

on January 20, 2015.3

Period of Review 

The period of review is November 1, 

2012, through October 31, 2013. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or primed 

polyethylene terephthalate film (PET 

Film), whether extruded or co-extruded. 

Excluded are metallized films and other 

finished films that have had at least one 

of their surfaces modified by the 

application of a performance-enhancing 

resinous or inorganic layer more than 

0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is 

roller transport cleaning film which has 

at least one of its surfaces modified by 

application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR 

latex. Tracing and drafting film is also 

excluded. PET Film is classifiable under 

subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, our 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by parties in the case 

and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, from 

Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United 

Arab Emirates: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results’’ 

(Decision Memorandum), dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted 

by, this notice. A list of the issues 

addressed in the Decision Memorandum 

is appended to this notice. The Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is available electronically via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Services System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov, and it is available to 

all parties in the Central Records Unit 

of the main Commerce Building, Room 

7046. In addition, a complete version of 

the Decision Memorandum is also 

accessible on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Decision Memorandum and 

the electronic versions of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we made 

adjustments to our margin calculations 

for JBF. Specifically, we have made 

adjustments for commissions JBF 

received in the home and U.S. markets, 

we have adjusted JBF’s finance expense 

ratio, and we have adjusted the 

materials cost to account for certain 

inputs JBF purchased from an affiliated 

party.4 A complete discussion of these 

adjustments and changes can be found 

in the Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period of November 1, 2012, through 

October 31, 2013: 

Producer or 

exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent ad valorem) 

JBF RAK LLC ....... 11.49 

Disclosure 

We will disclose to interested parties 

the calculations performed in 

connection with these final results 

within five days of the publication of 

this notice, consistent with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review.5 The 

Department intends to issue appropriate 

assessment instructions directly to CBP 

15 days after the date of publication of 

these final results of review. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices 19965 

6See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 7See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

8 Id.; see also Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic 

of China and the United Arab Emirates: 

Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value for 

the United Arab Emirates, 73 FR 66595, 66596 

(November 10, 2008). 9 Id. 

1See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic 

of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 

(September 1, 2010). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 51958 

(September 2, 2014). 

For assessment purposes we 

calculated importer-specific, ad valorem 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the examined sales to the total 

entered value of those same sales.6 We 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003.7 This clarification applies 

to entries of subject merchandise during 

the period of review produced by 

companies under review in these final 

results for which the reviewed 

companies did not know their 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States. In such instances, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the all-others rate of 4.05 percent from 

the less-than-fair-value investigation if 

there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.8

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of these final results, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) For 

the company covered by this review, the 

cash deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

listed above in the section ‘‘Final 

Results of Review;’’ (2) for merchandise 

exported by producers or exporters not 

covered in this review but covered in a 

previously completed segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the final results for the 

most recent period in which that 

producer or exporter participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review or in any previous segment of 

this proceeding, but the producer is, 

then the cash deposit rate will be that 

established for the producer of the 

merchandise in these final results of 

review or in the final results for the 

most recent period in which that 

producer participated; and (4) if neither 

the exporter nor the producer is a firm 

covered in this review or in any 

previously completed segment of this 

proceeding, then the cash deposit rate 

will be 4.05 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the less than fair value 

investigation.9 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice is the only reminder to 

parties subject to the administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred which will result in the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h). 

Dated: April 7, 2015. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

Issues in the Decision Memorandum 

Comment 1: Adjustments for Commissions in 

U.S. Dollars Rather than Local Currency 

Comment 2: Financing Expense Ratio is Not 

Supported by Information on the Record 

Comment 3: The Financing Expense Ratio 

Does Not Include All Elements of 

Financing 

Comment 4: Differences in Prices Paid to 

Affiliated and Unaffiliated Suppliers in 

Material Cost Adjustments 

Comment 5: Commissions to Offset Normal 

Value 

[FR Doc. 2015–08581 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–844] 

Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From Taiwan: Rescission, in 

Part, of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective date: April 14, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alice Maldonado or David Crespo, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4682 and (202) 

482–3693, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 1, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (Department) 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on narrow 

woven ribbons with woven selvedge 

(narrow woven ribbons) from Taiwan.1

On September 2, 2014, the Department 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order, covering the 

period September 1, 2013, through 

August 31, 2014.2 On September 30, 

2014, the Department received a timely 

request for an antidumping duty 

administrative review from the 

petitioner, Berwick Offray LLC, and its 

wholly-owned subsidiary Lion Ribbon 

Company, Inc. (the petitioner), for the 

following companies: (1) A-Madeus 

Textile Ltd. (A-Madeus); (2) Cheng 

Hsing Ribbon Factory (Cheng Hsing); (3) 

Fujian Rongshu Industry Co., Ltd. 

(Fujian Rongshu); (4) Guangzhou 

Complacent Weaving Co., Ltd. 

(Guangzhou Complacent); (5) Hen Hao 

Trading Co. Ltd. a.k.a. Taiwan Tulip 

Ribbons and Braids Co. Ltd. (Hen Hao); 

(6) King Young Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

(King Young); (7) Roung Shu Industry 

Corporation (Roung Shu); (8) Xiamen 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES