alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, HassanM. Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: November 8, 2005 | /s/ HASSAN  M. AHMED                                                                            |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Hassan M. Ahmed                                                                                 |
|                        | *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the  Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

Learning Tree International USA, Inc. (U.S.) 

Technology For Business & Industry, Inc. (U.S.) 

Learning Tree International, K.K. (Japan) 

Learning Tree International Ltd. (United Kingdom) 

Learning Tree Limited(United Kingdom) 

Learning Tree International S.A. (France) 

Learning Tree International AB (Sweden) 

Learning Tree Publishing AB (Sweden) 

Learning Tree International Inc. (Canada) 

Learning Tree International Ltd. (Hong Kong) 

Advanced Technology Marketing, Inc. (U.S.) 

System for Business and Industry,Inc. (U.S.)
#### At a meeting in the chambers of the honourable judge Mathews.—William Wightman and Sarah his wife *vs.*Joseph and Charles Brown, executors of Joseph Brown, deceased.

*JULY*1790.

case eyii.

a. b. p. 253.

Injunction to restrain exe-committing11 waste or sel-Imp estate testator.

See note of chancellor Mathews, on his brief.’

The bill was for an account and settlement of an cs-tate. — On motion of Mr. Pringle, solicitor for complain-aihs, and cause shewn in support thereof, it is ordered, that an injunction do issue *to restrain the defendants from committing waste and selling or disposing of any of the rem aining part of the testator’s real estate,*until the further “ †, . *J*, order ot this court.

The court afterwards decreed, that the executors should account and pay over to complainant and his "wife, wTho was a legatee, what should appear to be due to them, an<^ ordered a reference to the master for that purpose: And that the executors (who were the testator’s sons and devisees) should sell as much of the real estate of their testator as would be sufficient to pay the legacy, in preference to the private creditors of the executors and de-visees, who were much embarrassed in their affairs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                          29,557
<SECURITIES>                                   119,491
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                       298
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          40,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       220,397
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,806
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,307
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,119
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                     358
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
February 1809.

case hi.

#### Gibson and others *vs.*Broadfoot.

(Tried before Chancellor Rutledge and decree pronounced by him

February 10, 1809.]

So much of the award as exceeded the submission., set aside.

THIS is a motion on the part of complainant, to set aside the award of arbitrators, so far as it relates to the ship Connecticut, for that the arbitrators exceeded their authority in determining on this subject, which was not submitted to them, and have determined contrary to law.

I have perused the bill in this case, and find that the matters in controversy between the parties are merely relative to the co-partnership concerns ,• and the ship Connecticut is not at all noticed in either of the bills. The order of the court refers the controversies of the parties to arbitrators. They both, in their letters to the arbitrators, expressly inform them that the business respecting the Connecticut is not referred to them, but will be submitted separately. The arbitrators have nevertheless decided on the subject. I have perused all-the letters which were written by Messrs. McLure and Robertson ; those of Mr. W. Broadfoot, in the first instance, wrhen the vessel was sent to Liverpool, wherein W. Gibson & Co. were directed to sell her if a certain price could be obtained; and the letters from W. Gibson & Co. to defendant, then in London, on the subject of an ad*12venture to Buenos Ayres in this vessel, if a license could be obtained for that *purpose; but I*do not find a single word in them which can make complainants liable to be charged as part owners or as anyway concerned in her : on the other hand, in the letter from W. Gibson & Co. in 1806, when it was found impracticable to obtain a license, they acquainted defendant that she could not be considered as belonging to the new concern. Defendant was to commence in January, 1807. After the notice arbitrators had received from both complainant and defendant, that this vessel would be the subject of another submission, it appears to me that they have exceeded the powers delegated to them by the order of *reference;*and therefore, that part of the award should be set aside.

[There was no appeal from this decree.]
RE

1 ‐ HF

顕倒m

ea 野担

ec e

y n 8 3
ur

nd

RP

s r co

8 3 s s 0 0

\壱次
l i

1 ) ce l i ce l -

2 0 0 h雛 c e o o

o f 2 0

0 0

1i tr 〇 〇

EC o o c e 9 9

Th 正鵠a a I]
8 3

S S

mm

m 魚

dy

s s cc d P

of

e c ri

of

e c ri

udy ec l i by c e

It o f dy

i l

0 0

AJn f S

24 24

礒鉱 2 9

0 0

of s s c e
8 3

1 i

e c l i of

a正

ef

by

- 1 d b

ec

c e e c upp
8 3

RP RA

肛則

萩肛

K顕 8 3

s s 魚m

魚mne c c

( 1 ( 1

0 0

o o

0 0 nu

0 0 nv

nv 0 0

ce og l i l 1 i l ' I ECD G l i

pp

1 l ( 1 i l

0 0 Ph o o

ab

1 1 0 0

of 0 5 ti

ac 9 9
8 3

dy 0 0

×p 0 0

×p ne 24

0 0

1 )

ea

c e c e e C un

〆u比 〆u

〆u e 5 メM 24 o f

rn度 ti

i l

t s i l

s s

r s e c

〆u 〆u化

ゑu 24 ' '

rn ti ti o f A4 nu

c e ! l o f a a

e c

S e

pp o f

e c
MM

l -

( 1

魚m ce

Pu

t t

C e

8 3 8 3

c e

8 5 1 l

ト4 nzo a 0 0

7 7

7 7

nz 1 1 0 6 6

1 1

5 5

mm
8 3

t)

2 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0
8 3

l l

ec

rnn l i d by
8 3

up l i ZE RA

nu

9 9 9 6

of

a of

e c ee 3 a

s s mmH 24 s s

r s 1i

o o

A4 1 O

i 1

s s

i l o o

S o l i i li i l

hy l f S o nk ov

c e nk

S o

d by

i l

age c

c e

ab

e c a o xp
ce of

n虹n

e c

山m

魚m

皿m

mm
r s of

(t of a of

0 0 0

of s s i l e e ce 1 l

ti

ce

o o

Tn 9 9 o o

0 0

r s

0 o d d t t

0 0 of

i l e e

s s

o f o f

ce

ca of c e by 1 l

s s of ea

o f

ee - 1

o f
of

r1 ak by

) )

of m 魚

s s

hエ

un v切 o o e c l 一 1 9 9 灯u

e c i l i of

e e l i
8 3

og

c e

hy nz 0 0

Tn 3 3

3 3

47

5 8

nz 0 7 0 6 6

7 0

(t / t

s s of

k 十

ir 自負

o g

o g e c

ww n v 6 7 nv on
pp

PP

c e

ee

e c AE

ph

ce

c e

nz

pu

hy

Pu

Pu
C e

1 【

2 6

1 1

9 5 44

3 8

7 7

5 6

l 1 0 6

1 l 0 5

5 5

du

( t - t。 )

0 6

ト4

][

e e
0 0 0 0 6 0 o o

自転
d y N

f e e n t e I , 0 0

K N O T o n e c

7 8 9

4 4 2 9 9

2 5 6 8

4 4 3 7 2 6

3 5 3 4

3 8 8

1 1

0 0

2 3

o k O N a k a

e f e n c e p e t e - . 0 0

K N O T t C o

2 6 9 9 3

2 3 7 6 1 1

3 3 8 7 1 1 7 8

0 5 0 7 2

5 2 5 5 3

0 4 6 9

2 8 8

2 3

p e mo O N a k a

m - t e I , 0 0

K N a H t C o n c

5 5 5 8 0 0

o k o N

e s m ‐ t e 0 0

N O a H t C o n c

5 5 6 9 8 8 0 O

6 9 o o

o m o k o N a k a y 。

P L C n c f f e n o d

J u l .
y N 8 3

a n n o p e t e J u - . 0 8

K N h t o n

e c

C h f o o n c o e P L

D a t e J u I . Z 多
4 0

2 0

4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

S a

0 0
0 0

- -

0 0 0 0 0 5 0

8 3

eC m m
" - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6 0

... - - 【 一 - 【 - - - - ...~

- ... ... ... . .

0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 KG

l i
丸 い

認番

基準 質評

理事

造等

規化学物 験並 化学物

定す

2 2

造産

試験 学物 機構 留米事業所 び2東

試験施 県久 米市 字下 6 0

解度 縮度試験 数試
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001002175
<NAME>                        LABTEC INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                          768,150
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   17,889,858
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     10,661,758
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                31,116,443
<PP&E>                          2,329,880
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,444,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  46,968,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           16,181,262
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        69,036
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    46,968,389
<SALES>                         64,273,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                64,273,410
<CGS>                           40,657,361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   40,657,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              3,516,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (6,041,871)
<INCOME-TAX>                   (1,370,471)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (4,671,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                (270,754)
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                   (4,942,154)
<EPS-BASIC>                  (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (0.99)



</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CORDIS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2012-1647

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 10-CV-0039, Judge Sue L. 

Robinson.

______________________ 

Decided: May 13, 2013

______________________ 

CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR., Sidley Austin, LLP, of 

Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him 

on the brief were DAVID T. PRITIKIN, WILLIAM H.

BAUMGARTNER, JR., and ANTHONY BALKISSOON. Of counsel was LINDA R. FRIEDLIEB. 

MATTHEW M. WOLF, Arnold & Porter LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on 
2 CORDIS CORP. v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. 

the brief were EDWARD HAN, JOHN E. NILSSON and SETH I.

HELLER. 

______________________ 

Before O'MALLEY, SCHALL, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. 

We affirm the judgment of the district court without 

opinion. We vacate, however, the portion of the district 

court’s decision “nullifying” (invalidating) dependent 

claims 14–16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,547,817. See Cordis 

Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp., 868 F. Supp. 2d 342, 356-

57 (D. Del. 2012).

AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Technical Information Service


National Technical Information Service Advisory Board

AGENCY: National Technical Information Service.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the next meeting of the National 
Technical Information Service Advisory Board (the Advisory Board), 
which advises the Secretary of Commerce and the Director of the 
National Technical Information Service (NTIS) on policies and 
operations of the Service.

DATES: The Advisory Board will meet on Friday, April 24, 2015 from 
10:00 a.m. to approximately 2:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Advisory Board will be held in Room 116 of the NTIS 
Facility at 5301 Shawnee Road, Alexandria, Virginia 22312. Please note 
admittance instructions under the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 
this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bruce Borzino, (703) 605-6405, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6507070a171f0c0b0a250b110c164b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b29292439312225240b253f2238652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NTIS Advisory Board is established by 
Section 3704b(c) of Title 15 of the United States Code. The charter has 
been filed in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.).
    The meeting will focus on a review of NTIS performance and 
accomplishments in the first half of Fiscal Year 2015. A final agenda 
and summary of the proceedings will be posted at NTIS Web site as soon 
as they are available (http://www.ntis.gov/about/advisorybd.aspx).
    The NTIS Facility is a secure one. Accordingly persons wishing to 
attend should call the NTIS Visitors Center, (703) 605-6040, to arrange 
for admission no later than Monday, April 20, 2015. If there are 
sufficient expressions of interest, up to one-half hour will be 
reserved for public comments during the session. Questions from the 
public will not be considered by the Board but any person who wishes to 
submit a written question for the Board's consideration should mail or 
email it to the NTIS Visitor Center, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e98b8686829a9d869b8ca9879d809ac78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33515c5c5840475c4156735d475a401d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>, not later than 
Monday, April 20, 2015.

    Dated: April 7, 2015.
Bruce Borzino,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2015-08390 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7677

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DONALD L. JONES, JR., Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CR-95-17, CA-98-13-1) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald L. Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donald L. Jones, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jones , Nos. CR95-17; CA-98-13-1 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 9, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salary.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Paul R. Daoust, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Bryce Chicoyne, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our best knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report,
nor is it to be deemed to be filed for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: August 16, 2010



/s/ Paul R. DaoustPaul R. DaoustPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date:
August 16, 2010



/s/ Bryce ChicoyneBryce Chicoyne Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION

I, Kelly Tucek, Vice President, certify that:

- I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.;  
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  
- The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

> - designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
- evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
- disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

- The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> - all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
- any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation      General Partner
/S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________Name: Kelly TucekTitle: Vice President of the General Partner and          principal financial officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.Date: March 26, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates II L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 17, 2009 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.