alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3593 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3593

 To amend the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 to 
  extend by one year the operation of Radio Free Asia, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2009

 Mr. Royce (for himself and Ms. Ros-Lehtinen) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 to 
  extend by one year the operation of Radio Free Asia, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF OPERATION OF RADIO FREE ASIA.

    Section 309(f) of the United States International Broadcasting Act 
of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6208(f)) is amended by striking ``2009'' and 
inserting ``2010''.
                                 <all>
```
Elements 

• Identify Chemical, Biological, 

Radiological, and Nuclear 

agents and substances, assess 

current and projected 

consequences, advise on 

response measures and assist 

with requests for additional 

support 

• Operations mandated by law

• Receive more than 600 hours of 

high-tech training by agencies 

such as Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, Dept. of 

Energy, Dept. of Justice, and the 

Environmental Protection 

Agency

• 55 CSTs are located in each 

state and U.S. territory and 

Washington D.C.; two in CA

• 53 certified CSTs, remaining 

two in certification program as 

of July 1, 2008. 

• Alert and on standby 24/7/365 

• Deployable within 90 minutes 

(advance team); main body 

deployable within three hours 

• Operates specialized equipment 

including a specialized/secure 

communications vehicle 

(Unified Command Suite), and a 

mobile analytical laboratory 

system with a full suite of 

chemical, biological, and 

radiological analysis equipment 

Example of CST Operations: 

• 2001 World Trade Center 

response, Space Shuttle 

Columbia recovery, Salt Lake 

City Winter Olympics, 

Hurricane Katrina recovery, and 

various National and State 

Special Security events. 

Funding: 

• Federally resourced, trained, 

equipped, and sustained, yet 

state controlled 

Broad range capabilities at a moment’s notice 

Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team (WMD CST) Mission:

Assesses hazards, advises civil authorities, and facilitates military support 

during emergencies and incidents of suspected weapons of mass destruction or 

other disasters. In addition, the CST advises civilian responders on appropriate 

actions through on-site testing and expert consultation, and assists and 

facilitates in the arrival of follow-on state and federal military forces. 

Overview: The Adjutant General either employs the WMD CST to support the 

state response under the direction of the governor or to support another state’s 

response under a supported governor. 

The WMD CST is comprised of 22 full-time, Title 32 AGR Army and Air 

National Guard personnel divided into six sections: command, operations, 

communications, administration/logistics, medical/analytical, and survey. Each 

unit is staffed by 14 Army Military Occupational Skills and/or 57 Air Force 

Specialty Codes. 

Units assigned transport includes a command vehicle, operations trailer, a 

communications vehicle called the Unified Command Suite (which provides a 

broad spectrum of secure communications capabilities), an Analytical 

Laboratory System vehicle (containing a full suite of analysis equipment to 

support the characterization of the hazard) and general purpose vehicles. The 

WMD CST normally deploys using its assigned vehicles, or can be airlifted as 

required. 

Learn More: http://www.ngb.army.mil/features/HomelandDefense/cst/factsheet.html

For more information contact NGB Public Affairs (Media Desk) 703-607-2584 

Current as of 17 July, 2008
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 03, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 03, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0049. COOK SALES, INC. v. CONCRETE ENTERPRISES, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2019CV0023
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER

Cause No

. 01

- 11

- 00545

- CV ; Lawrence S. Oleksy, Appellant v. Farmers Insurance Exchange,

Appellee

On appeal from Trial Court Ca se No. 08

- DCV

- 165626 , in the 400 th District Court of Fort Bend County , Texas.

This case was previously set for submission without oral argument on October 9 , 2012. This case is hereby removed from the October 9 , 2012 submission docket, and the Court requests that the parties provide supplemental briefing in accordance with this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.7 (“A brief may be amended or supplemented whenever justice requires, on whatever

reasonable terms the co urt may prescribe.”).

The Court requests briefing on the following issues :

1. T he effect, if any, of N.Y. V EH

. & T RAF

. L AW § 2229 (“Snowmobile, not a motor vehicle”) , and any other relevant related provision of the New York Vehicle and Traffic Law, on the parties’ arguments pertaining to construction and application

in this case of the recreational vehicle exclusion to the motor

- vehicle exception in
the homeowner’s ins urance policy at issue;

2. Whether the issues raised in the parties’ motions for summ ary judgment permit this Court to consider the effect, if any, of section 2229 of the New York Vehicle

and Traffic Law on the construction of the homeowner’s insurance policy provisions at issue

, see T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 166a(c) ; and

3. In light of the procedural posture of this summary

- judgment appeal, what dispositions this Court may properly consider.

Olesky’s supplemental brief is due on October 22, 2012. Farmers Insurance Exchange’s supplemental brief is due November 5, 2012. Olesky’s reply brief, if any, is due November 19, 2012. The Court requests that supplemental brief s be no longer than 10 pages and address only

the issues identified in this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

Acting individually

Date: October 8, 2012
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Wayne R.
Hellman and/or Louis S. Fisi his attorney-in-fact, with the power of
substitution, for him in his capacity as director of Advanced Lighting
Technologies, Inc., to sign the Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year
ending on June 30, 1998, and any amendments thereto, and to file the same with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorney-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE                                   TITLE                                       DATE
---------                                   -----                                       ----
<S>                                         <C>                                         <C>
/s/ Francis H. Beam                         Director                                    September 28, 1998
-----------------------------
Francis H. Beam

/s/ John R. Buerkle                         Director                                    September 28, 1998
-----------------------------
John R. Buerkle

/s/ Theodore A. Filson                      Director                                    September 28, 1998
-----------------------------
Theodore A. Filson

/s/ Louis S. Fisi                           Director                                    September 28, 1998
-----------------------------
Louis S. Fisi

/s/ Susumu Harada                           Director                                    September 28, 1998
-----------------------------
Susumu Harada

/s/ Wayne R. Hellman                        Director                                    September 28, 1998
-----------------------------
Wayne R. Hellman

/s/ Alan J. Ruud                            Director                                    September 28, 1998
-----------------------------
Alan J. Ruud

/s/ A Gordon Tunstall                       Director                                    September 28, 1998
-----------------------------
A Gordon Tunstall
</TABLE>
Mr. 0. W. McStay 

Executive Secretary 

State Board of Barber 

512 Sam Houston State 

Austin, Texas 7070: 

Dear Mr. McStay: 

You ask: 

March 24. 1976 

Examiners 

Office Bldg. 

Opinion No. H-801 

Re: Right of Board of 

Barber Examiners to refuse 

renewal of barber's 

license on grounds of 

his incarceration. 

Does the State Board of Barber Examiners 

have the right to refuse a licensee's 

application for renewal of his barber's 

license if he is incarcerated at the time 

the application is made? 

Section 21 of article 8407a, V.T.C.S., the Texas Barber 

Law, reads: 

The board [of barber examiners] shall 

either refuse to issue orto renew, or 

shall suspend or revoke any certificate 

of registration for any one of, or a 

combination of the following causes: 

(A) Gross malpracticet 

(B) Continued practice by a 

person knowingly having an infectious 

or contagious disease; 

(C) Advertising by means of knowingly making false or deceptive statements; 

(D) Advertising, practicing, or 

attempting to practice under another's 

trade name or another's name; 

p. 3380 
The Honorable 0. W. McStay - page 2 (H-801) 

(E) Habitual drunkenness or habitual 

addiction to the use of morphine, cocaine, 

or other habit-forming drugs; 

(F) The commission of any of the offenses 

described in Section 24 of this Act; 

(G) No certificate shall be issued or 

renewed, unless and until each applicant 

shall present a health certificate from a 

regular practicing medical doctor showing 

that the applicant is free from any kind of 

infectious or contagious diseases, tuberculosis, communicable diseases, and free 

from the use of any kind of morphine, 

cocaine, or other habit-forming drug, or 

a habitual drunkard and that said applicant 

shall make affidavit to said medical examiner that all of the said facts are true. 

"Incarceration" is not a synonym for "conviction." It 

can occur when the person incarcerated is guilty of nothing. 

See U.S. v. Mills, 434 F.Zd 266 (8th Cir. 1970). --A 

A licensing agency for a business or profession is 

not empowered to make standards which are different from or 

inconsistent with those of the controlling statute, even 

though they may be reasonable and may be administered reasonably. Bloom v. Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists, 

492 S.W~6b(Tex.up.73);urphy v. MitteEtadt, 199 

S.W.Zd 470 (Tex.Sup. 1947). Cf. Texas KateBoard Examiners 

~ all ~~,4~~~si~~c~~x~~u~~~~l~ 

z -'Article 8407a specifies the eight broad reason; 

the Board of Barber Examiners may assign for refusing to 

renew a barber's license and "suffering incarceration" is 

not one of the enumerated reasons. Nor is incarceration an 

"offense" under section 24 as incorporated by paragraph F of 

section 21. Of course, a person's incarceration may provide 

notice to the Board that one of the eight may be applicable. 

p. 3381
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Zhilin Li,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Basic Empire  Corporation  and will be retained by Basic Empire
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                                     Date: November 13, 2007

                                                     By:  /s/ Zhilin Li
                                                          -------------
                                                              Zhilin Li
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Roebling  Financial  Corp,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the
"Report")  as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof, we, Frank J. Travea,  III,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,  and
Janice A. Summers,  Senior Vice  President,  Chief  Operating  Officer and Chief
Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/Frank J. Travea, III                       /s/Janice A. Summers
-------------------------------------         ----------------------------------
Frank J. Travea, III                          Janice A. Summers
President and Chief Executive Officer         Senior Vice President, Chief
                                                Operating Officer and Chief
                                                Financial Officer




May 10, 2004
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 RTI International Metals, Inc. 
 Board of Directors Compensation Program 

Effective April 25, 2013 
  

	 	•	 	 Target annual compensation is $150,000 for non-employee directors other than the Chairman and $240,000 for the non-employee Chairman and shall be paid
50% in restricted stock and 50% in cash. 


  

	 	•	 	 In addition to the target compensation set forth above, the following annual cash premiums will be paid for chairing the following standing committees:



  

	 	•	 	 Audit Committee: $20,000 


  

	 	•	 	 Compensation Committee: $20,000 


  

	 	•	 	 Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee: $10,000 


  

	 	•	 	 There will be no per meeting fees paid for regular board or committee meetings. However, meeting fees for extraordinarily frequent meetings of the
Board or Committees (whether standing or ad hoc) required to consider transactions or other special circumstances, as determined by the Chairman, in the amount of $1,000 per meeting may be awarded. Special meeting fees shall not be paid to either
the non-employee Chairman or to any employee who is also a director serving on such committee. The cash portion of annual target compensation, committee chair premiums, and any special meeting fees are payable in cash quarterly.



  

	 	•	 	 Restricted stock will be awarded at beginning of a plan year (commencing with annual shareholders’ meeting) and vest at end of plan year. Partial
vesting for directors who leave before their term is up will be at discretion of the Compensation Committee upon recommendation of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. 



 

	 	•	 	 Restricted stock will be held in custody by RTI until restriction is terminated and then a certificate, free of all restrictions, shall be issued in
the director’s name (or a trust as he or she shall designate). Directors shall be entitled to vote the shares of restricted stock upon grant at the beginning of the plan year. 



Adopted by the Board of Directors: April 25, 2013 
 Stock Ownership Guidelines 
 Each non-employee director is expected to own, at a minimum, shares of
RTI common stock equal to three (3) times their annual retainer. This level of ownership is to be achieved within three years from the approval of this proposal for existing directors and five years of first joining the Board for new directors
elected after the approval of this proposal. Once a Director reaches this level of stock ownership, the Director will remain in compliance of this expectation, regardless of market fluctuations, as long as the Director does not sell shares at a time
when the aggregate value is less than the expected level. 
 Adopted by the Board of Directors: July 27, 2007
* Honorable Jesse E. Eschbach, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

1 In an order filed with the clerk on August 29, 1994, the panel granted the defendants' petition for rehearing. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Nos. 93-8905, 93-9165. Linda L. HARRELL, Individually, as Personal Repr esentative, and as Surviving Spouse of Larry Gene Harrell, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. DECATUR COUNTY, GA., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Jan. 10, 1995. Appeal from the United States Di strict Court for the Middle District of Georgia (No. 91-59-THOM). J. Robert Elliott, District Judge. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before HATCHETT and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH * , Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: Our previous panel opinion reported at 22 F.3d 1570 (11th Cir.1994) is hereby VACATED. 1 After rehearing this case, which included the consideration of supplemental briefs and additional oral argument, we now affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment in all respects. We affirm for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina's dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F.3d at 1577-1581, and this court's recent decision in Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, 28 F.3d 1146 (1994) (en banc), which the panel did not have the benefit of at the time we released our opinion in Harrell. AFFIRMED. ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring: I agree with this court's decision to affirm th e district court's grant of summary judgment on the question of qualified immunity for Deputy Morri s in his individual capacity for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina's dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F.3d at 1577-1580 and this court's recentdecision in Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, 28 F.3d 1146 (11th Cir.1994) (en banc). I write separately to emphasize that we affirm the distri ct court's grant of summary judgment with respect to the claims against Deputy Morris in his official capacity, Sheriff Phillips in his individual and official capacities, Decatur County, and the Decatur County Commissioners because of our determination that Harrell was not deprived of a ny constitutional rights for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina's dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F.3d at 1580-81.
FORM 8-K


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549



                                 CURRENT REPORT

                Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
                              Exchange Act of 1934


                                December 14, 1998
                                 Date of Report



                                AJAY SPORTS, INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


                  Delaware             0-18204             39-1644025
                ---------------        -----------        --------------
               (State or other         (Commission       (I.R.S. Employer
                jurisdiction of         file number)     Identification Number)
                incorporation or
                organization)


         1501 E. Wisconsin Street
         Delavan, WI                                             53115
         ----------------------------------------                ------
         (Address of Principal Executive Offices)              (Zip Code)


   Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (414) 728-5521


                                       N/A
                    --------------------------------------------
          Former name or former address, if changed from last report


<PAGE>


 ITEM 5:  Other Events

     On December 14, 1998, Ajay Sports,  Inc. (the "Registrant")  announced that
its Board of  Directors  has  extended  the  expiration  date of the Ajay Sports
publicly traded common stock warrants until June 30, 1999. The warrants were set
to expire on December 31, 1998  had they not been  extended.  As a result of the
1-for-6 reverse split of the Company's common stock in August 1998, the exercise
of six  warrants  allows the holder to purchase one share of the common stock of
Ajay Sports for $6.00 per share. The warrants are traded  over-the-counter under
the symbol "AJAYW".


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

 Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  the
 Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
 undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


 Date: December 15, 1998

                                AJAY SPORTS, INC.


 
                                  By s\Robert R. Hebard
                                    --------------------------
                                   Robert R. Hebard, Secretary
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 1 36

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)