Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 19073 

7See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

8For a full discussion of this clarification, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

9See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, 

Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden, 70 FR 39734 

(July 11, 2005). 

1A/k/a Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga Stationery 

Company, Ltd., and Beijing Dixon Stationery 

Company. 

2See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of Initiation and 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 80 FR 10457 (February 26, 

2015) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying 

memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Order on 

Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of 

China: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review Requested by the Dixon 

Ticonderoga Companies’’ dated February 18, 2015 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

3See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased 

Pencils from the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 

66909 (December 28, 1994) (Order). 

4See Certain Cased Pencils From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Determination To 

Revoke Order In Part; 2010–2011, 78 FR 42932 (July 

18, 2013) (Revocation) and accompanying issues 

and decision memorandum (IDM). 

written briefs, within 120 days after the 

date of publication of this notice, unless 

extended, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, the Department 

shall determine and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. If CP Kelco’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis in 

the final results of this review, we will 

calculate an importer-specific 

assessment rate on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of antidumping 

duties calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales and the total entered 

value of such sales in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If CP Kelco’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of review, or an importer-specific rate is 

zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to dumping margins.7

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003.8 This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by CP Kelco 

for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States. In such instances, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction. 

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 15 days after publication of the 

final results of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication as provided 

by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for CP Kelco Oy will 

be the rate established in the final 

results of this administrative review 

except if the rate is de minimis within 

the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for merchandise exported by 

manufacturers or exporters not covered 

in this review but covered in a prior 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recent period in which the 

manufacturer or exporter participated; 

(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

in this review, a prior review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value 

investigation but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 6.65 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.9 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 2, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of The Order 

Methodology 

Fair Value Comparisons 

Product Comparisons 

Determination of Comparison Margins 

Results of Differential Pricing Analysis 

Date of Sale 

U.S. Price 

Export Price 

Constructed Export Price 

U.S. Sample Sales 

Normal Value 

Home Market Viability as Comparison 

Market 

Calculation of NV Based On Comparison 

Market Prices 

Home Market Sample Sales 

Cost of Production Analysis 

Level of Trade Analysis 

CEP Offset 

Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Constructed Value 

Currency Conversion 

Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2015–08210 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–827] 

Certain Cased Pencils From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On February 26, 2015, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the notice of 

initiation and the preliminary results of 

the changed circumstances review 

(CCR) of the antidumping duty order on 

certain cased pencils (pencils) from the 

People’s Republic of China (PRC), in 

which the Department preliminarily 

determined that Beijing FILA Dixon 

Stationery Co., Ltd.1 (Beijing Dixon), as 

currently structured under its new 

business license, is the successor-ininterest to Beijing Dixon.2 For these 

final results, the Department continues 

to find that Beijing Dixon is the 

successor-in-interest to Beijing Dixon as 

that entity existed at the time the 

Department revoked the order 3 with 

respect to Beijing Dixon.4 Accordingly, 

the Revocation of the antidumping duty 

Order with respect to Beijing Dixon 

continues to apply to Beijing Dixon as 

currenly structured. 

DATES: Effective: April 9, 2015. 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
19074 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 

5See Order. 

6See Revocation and accompanying IDM. 

7See letter from Beijing Dixon to the Department 

dated November 27, 2014, ‘‘Request for Changed 

Circumstances Review pursuant to 19 CFR 351.216 

on behalf of Dixon Ticonderoga Company.’’ 

8See Prelilminary Results and Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

9For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4. 10See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 10457. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sergio Balbontin, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–6478. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 28, 1994, the 

Department published the Order on 

pencils from the PRC.5 On July 18, 2013, 

the Department revoked the Order on 

pencils from the PRC with respect to 

pencils exported by Beijing Dixon.6

On November 27, 2014, Beijing Dixon 

requsted that the Department conduct a 

CCR pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

19 CFR 351.216(b), and 19 CFR 351.221, 

to determine whether it is the successorin-interest to Beijing Dixon for purposes 

of the Order.7 On February 26, 2015, the 

Department concurrently initiated and 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

CCR of the antidumping duty Order on 

pencils exported by Beijing Dixon.8 We 

invited comments from interested 

parties, but no party commented on the 

Preliminary Results or requested a 

hearing. This CCR is being conducted in 

accordance with section pursuant to 

section 751(b) of the Act, 19 CFR 

351.216, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

includes pencils from the PRC. Pencils 

are currently classifiable under 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheading 

9609.1010. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written product description is 

dispositive.9

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

Because no interested parties 

submitted comments on the 

Department’s Preliminary Results, and 

because there is no other information or 

evidence on the record that calls into 

question the Preliminary Results, the 

Department adopts the reasoning and 

findings of fact outlined in the 

Prelilminary Results and Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum, and determines 

that Beijing Dixon is the successor-ininterest to Beijing Dixon at the time of 

the Revocation.10

Application of the Revocation of the 

Order 

As explained in the Preliminary 

Resuts and the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, the Revocation of the 

antidumping duty Order with respect to 

Beijing Dixon, as that entity existed at 

the time of Revocation, continues to 

apply to Beijing Dixon as currenly 

structured. 

Instructions to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection 

As a result of this determination, the 

Department finds that entries of subject 

merchandise exported by Beijing Dixon 

as currently structured should receive 

the same antidumping duty treatment 

with respect to cased pencils as its 

predecessor-in-interest. Accordingly, 

the Department will continue to instruct 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 

liquidate entries for Beijing Dixon 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

See 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to 

comply with the regulations and the 

terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. See 19 CFR part 354. 

These final results of administrative 

review are issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(e). 

Dated: April 3, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08221 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Proposed Information Collection; 

Comment Request; Pacific Islands 

Region Coral Reef Ecosystems Permit 

Form 

AGENCY: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork and 

respondent burden, invites the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on 

proposed and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before June 8, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental 

Paperwork Clearance Officer, 

Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 

14th and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230 (or via the 

Internet at JJessup@doc.gov). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the information collection 

instrument and instructions should be 

directed to Walter Ikehara, (808) 725– 

5175 or Walter.Ikehara@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

This request is for extension of a 

current information collection. 

National Marine Fisheries Service 

(NMFS) requires, as codified under 50 

CFR part 665, any person (1) fishing for, 

taking, retaining, or using a vessel to 

fish for Western Pacific coral reef 

ecosystem management unit species in 

the designated low-use Marine 

Protected Areas, (2) fishing for any of 

these species using gear not specifically 

allowed in the regulations, or (3) fishing 

for, taking, or retaining any Potentially 

Harvested Coral Reef Taxa in the coral 

reef ecosystem regulatory area, to obtain 

and carry a permit. A receiving vessel 

owner must also have a transshipment 

permit for at-sea transshipment of coral 

reef ecosystem management unit 

species. The permit application form 

provides basic information about the 

permit applicant, vessel, fishing gear 

and method, target species, projected 

fishing effort, etc., for use by NMFS and 

the Western Pacific Fishery 

Management Council in determining 

eligibility for permit issuance. The 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES