alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 of our report dated January 28, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule of Exabyte Corporation as of December 31, 2004 and for the year then ended, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement.

/s/  Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC

Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC

Denver, Colorado

April 15, 2005
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ellen B.Richstone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: August 8, 2005 | /s/ ELLEN  B. RICHSTONE         |
|----------------------|---------------------------------|
|                 | Ellen B. Richstone              |
|                 | *Chief Financial Officer * |
|                 | *(Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----
----

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  (1)  |  The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|  (2)  |  The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company.  |

|  */s/                Ronald Heineman*    |  */s/                Scott Horne*        |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|  Ronald                Heineman          |  Scott                Horne              |
|  Chief                Executive Officer  |  Chief                Financial Officer  |
|  Dated:                May 15, 2006      |  Dated:                May 15, 2006      |
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Richard J. Gaynor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|Date: May 8, 2008 |  | /s/RICHARD J. GAYNORRichard J. Gaynor Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
StormKlear EPA Case Study

Project: Morehead Road Improvements,

Cabarrus County, NC

Owner: NCDOT

Contractor: Granite Contracting LLC, Concord, NC

Product: StormKlear DPS Segmented Socks

Dose Rate: 5 mg/L

Description: This was a $4.2M TIV project awarded to Granite Contracting LLC, Concord, NC, in June 

to reconstruct Morehead Road to four lanes East of its current location. It also included a pedestria

vehicle overpass. Because of the exposed area and clay soils, turbidity posed potential problems du

normal rain events. StormKlear DPS Segmented Socks were installed directly on top of 8’ single net

excelsior matting in a channel; 12” x 10’ excelsior logs were used as check structures. The DBP‐2100 

installed  just after the 1st check, and the GelFloc after the 2nd check; the 3rd section was for settling 

additional filtration. Samples were then taken during a 1” rain event in early February 2011.

Results – Influent: 1195 NTU; After 3rd Check w/ settling:  42 NTU

Residual Biopolymer Test: Negative
22115

#### Peggy COPELAND, Respondent, v. The HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SPARTANBURG, S. C., Appellant.

(316 S. E. (2d) 408)

Supreme Court

*9*T. E. Walsh*and *William E. Walsh*of *Gaines & Walsh,*Spartanburg, *for appellant.*

*Albert V Smith*of *Turnipseed, Holland & Smith,*Spartan-burg, *for respondent.*

May 24, 1984.

Littlejohn, Chief Justice:

The plaintiff-respondent, Peggy Copeland, brings this action against The Housing Authority of Spartanburg, South Carolina. She alleges that she is entitled to recover damages because of the negligence of the defendant in failing to repair a gas furnace which emitted flames causing her furniture to be burned. The trial judge overruled the Demurrer of the City in effect overruling the doctrine of sovereign immunity. We reverse.

We hold that this doctrine of sovereign immunity is still applicable in South Carolina. If the law is to be changed, such change should come from the legislature. We reaffirmed this doctrine in *Belue v. The City of Spartanburg,*276 S. C. 381, 280 S. E. (2d) 49 (1981). The Demurrer should have been sustained and the order of the lower court is

Reversed.

Gregory, J., and J. Woodrow Lewis, as Acting Associate Justice, concur.

Harwell, Justice

(dissenting).

The trial court was correct in overruling the demurrer and I would affirm. The doctrine of sovereign immunity has outlived its usefulness and should be abolished. I agree with the dissent in *Belue v. The City of Spartanburg,*276 S. C. 381, 280 S. E. (2d) 49 (1981).

Ness, J., concurs.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 
 THIS ASSIGNMENT
OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT dated April 26, 2013, is made by and between Wheeler Interests, LLC a Virginia limited liability company, (“Assignor”), and WHLR-JENKS, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (“Assignee”).

 Background: 

A. Wheeler Interests, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company and WHLR-JENKS, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company previously
entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 24, 2013 (the “Agreement”), with respect to the purchase of a shopping center located in Jenks, Oklahoma and located at 446 South Elm Street; 

B. Assignor desires to assign the Agreement to Assignee. 
 Agreement: 
 For and in consideration of the mutual promises herein,
Assignor herby assigns all of its rights and delegates all of its obligations under the Agreement to Assignee, including all rights to any earnest money deposit or other payment, and Assignee hereby accepts the assignment of the rights of Assignor
under the Agreement and assumes all of the obligations and liabilities of Assignor under the Agreement. 
 (Signature Page
Follows) 







 In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the
26th day of April, 2013. 

ASSIGNOR: 
 Wheeler Interests, LLC 

a Virginia limited liability company 
  

			
	 	 	/s/ Jon S. Wheeler
		 	By Jon S. Wheeler, its Managing Member

 ASSIGNEE: 

WHLR-JENKS, LLC 
 a Virginia limited liability
company 
  

			
	 	 	/s/ Jon S. Wheeler
		 	By Jon S. Wheeler, its Manager
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Sonic Innovations, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Samuel L. Westover, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael
M. Halloran, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ SAMUEL L. WESTOVERSamuel L. WestoverPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 8, 2007/s/ MICHAEL M. HALLORANMichael M. HalloranVice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 8, 2007


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4201-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2015-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4201-DR), dated November 3, 2014, and related determinations.

# DATES: 

*Effective Date:*                         March 3, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Hawaii is hereby amended to include Public Assistance (Categories A and C-G) in the following area determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of November 3, 2014.

Hawaii County for Public Assistance [Categories A and C-G] (already designated for emergency protective measures [Category B], under the Public Assistance program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2015-08318 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. § 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Otix Global, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Samuel L. Westover,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael M. Halloran,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Samuel
      L. WestoverSamuel
      L. WestoverChairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2010/s/ Michael
      M. HalloranMichael
      M. HalloranVice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 13, 2010




This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# General Commissions Son Where He Commissioned Decades Earlier

/ Published Dec. 18, 2023

BOISE, Idaho - Brig. Gen. Ryan Robinson returned to the Idaho State Capitol Dec. 15 to administer the commissioning oath to the Idaho Army National Guard’s newest officer: his son, 2nd Lt. Benjamin Robinson.

Like his father, the lieutenant will begin his career in the Idaho Army National Guard after graduating from Boise State University's ROTC program and commissioning inside the state capitol. While in college, both Soldiers served as the Bronco Battalion's cadet commander.

“It means a lot,” the general said. “It’s great to see the next generation come up into the Guard family. I’m proud of Ben’s accomplishments, dedication and willingness to serve.”

Second Lt. Robinson’s dad wasn’t the only familiar face at his commissioning ceremony. After completing the oath, he accepted his first salute from his grandfather, Air Force veteran Thomas Robinson, who also gave Ryan his first salute in 1996 upon his own graduation and commissioning.

Second Lt. Robinson will serve as a quartermaster officer for the 116th Cavalry Brigade Combat Team’s G Company, 145th Brigade Support Battalion. He has drilled with the unit since November as a member of the Simultaneous Membership Program, which allows National Guard members to drill with a unit while completing ROTC.

Robinson said his decision to join the Idaho Army National Guard was based on more than just following in his dad’s footsteps.

“I wanted to serve but also pursue a career in mechanical engineering and stay in Idaho,” he said.

Robinson will put his mechanical engineering degree to good use at a Boise-based drone company.

“I’m honored to accept my commission from the Army and to begin my career, both on the Army side and on the civilian side,” he said.

Since commissioning himself, Brig. Gen. Robinson has successfully managed dual careers. He serves as the Idaho National Guard’s director of the joint staff and as a corporate finance officer in his civilian job. He deployed twice to Iraq in support of combat operations and has held commands at multiple echelons.
*Present*— Chancellors Rutledge, Hutson, and Mathe.ws.

#### Exparte H. C. Flagg and Rachel his wife.

DECEMBER. 1789.

CASE LV.

n. i). p. 216.

Court refused to exone-toys.

A petition was presented by general Pinckney, pray* ing that the petitioners might he appointed guardians of the persons and estates of the infant children of the petitioner Rachel, by a former marriage. On motion ordered, that the prayer of the petition be granted so far as respects the guardianship of the persons of the infants, .Rut the court refused its aid to exonerate and acquit H, Allston, surviving executor of W. Allston, jun. deceased* of his care and direction of the said infants’ estate.
|   | (1)    | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)    | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  May 15, 2018 | By:    | /s/ Kyle Kennedy                                                                                                                                      |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | KyleKennedy                                                                                                                                                |   |
|                           |   | President,ChiefExecutive Officer and Chairman of the Board(PrincipalExecutive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and acting PrincipalAccounting Officer) |   |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2018

No. 04-18-00091-CR

Brandon Edward COLEMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9600

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellate counsel’s motions to withdraw are GRANTED. Since appellant is indigent, 

new appellate counsel must be appointed. It is therefore ORDERED that these appeals are

ABATED to the trial court. See Duncan v. State, 653 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) 

(holding that appellate courts may abate appeals so that trial court can assure appellant has 

effective assistance of counsel). The trial court is ORDERED to appoint new appellate counsel 

and to cause the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record in each of these appeals no 

later than July 2, 2018, containing documentation of such appointment. After the supplemental 

clerk’s records are filed, the appeals will be reinstated on the docket of this court, and a new 

deadline will be set for the filing of appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion for extension of time 

to file appellant’s brief is MOOT.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of June, 2018.
___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

MEMORANDUM

DATE: September 18, 2015

TO: EPA Region 9 Rulemaking File for the BAAQMD NSR SIP Submittal

FROM: Shaheerah Kelly, EPA, Region 9, Air Division, Permits Office

SUBJECT: September 18, 2015 Conference Phone Call regarding the EPA Proposed Limited 

Approval and Limited Disapproval of Regulation 2, Rules 1 & 2

ATTENDEES

• Gerardo Rios, EPA Region 9, Air Division

• Kerry Drake, EPA Region 9, Air Division

• Laura Yannayon, EPA Region 9, Air Division

• Shaheerah Kelly, EPA Region 9, Air Division

• Ann Lyons, Region 9, Office of Regional Counsel

• Sandy Crockett, BAAQMD Counsel’s Office

SUMMARY

1. 40 CFR 51.160(a) and (b) – The District’s rule must include provisions that ensure new and 

modified sources will not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS. 

BAAQMD asked: What are guidelines or targets for analysis to answer question about 

whether a source will interfere with the NAAQS? Modeling for all sources? If so, what is the 

appropriate cutoff for modeling?

2. 40 CFR 51.307 – The current rule uses a 100-km distance threshold, but does not consider 

projects at distances beyond 100 km that “may have an impact” on Class I areas. 

Determination of whether analysis is necessary should be done in consultation with the 

Federal Land Manager (FLM). EPA recommended that BAAQMD look at rules for other air 

districts such as South Coast rule 1303. Bay Area strongly expressed that they wanted 

definitive rule guidelines. There are no definitive guidelines. They could look at using a 

distance threshold or a Q/D threshold per the FLM FLAG guidance.

ATTACHMENTS

• None
Table of Contents

  **UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION****Washington, D.C. 20549** **Form 20-F**   **o** **REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g)    OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** **OR** **þ** **ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**   **For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005** **o** **TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** **OR** **o** **SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF    THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**   **Date of event requiring this shell company report ****Commission file number 1-14406** **Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero)****P.T. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk.**(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)**Telecommunications Indonesia****(a state-owned public limited liability company)**(Translation of Registrant’s name into English) **Republic of Indonesia**(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)**Jalan Japati, 1****Bandung 40133****Indonesia****(62) (22) 452-1510****(62) (21) 521-5109***(Address of Registrant’s principal executive offices)          Securitiesregistered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) ofthe Act.   **Title of** **Name of each exchange****Each class** **on which registered**       American Depositary Shares representing Series B Shares,