alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2005
- 0161 FROM : Scott Christian, Environmental Engineer, OAR/OTAQ/CI SD SUBJEC T: Meeting notes for cellulosic biofuel waiver credits discussion DATE: November 12, 2009 Location : EPA offices Attendees : On phone Scot t Christian, EPA Jim Redding, Renewable Fuels Assn Samantha Slater, Renewable Fuels Assn Sandra Franco, Renewable Fuels Assn Wes Golson, Coskata Loula Merkel, Coskata Eric Gockel NES Bio Chris Hessler, representing Iogen
We discussed the invitee’s comme nts that were provided to the docket on the cellulosic biofuel waiver credits provision.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

 

Subsidiariesof the Registrant

 

Sanchez Software Limited, a DelawareCorporation

Sanchez Computer Associates International,Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Sanchez FSC, Inc., a Barbados Corporation

Sanchez Computer Associates, PolskaSp.z.o.o., a Polish Company

Sanchez Data Systems, Inc., formerlye-PROFILE, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

e-PROFILE Holdings, Inc., a DelawareCorporation

Sanchez Advisors, LLC, a Delaware Corporation

Sanchez Computer Associates Limited, a UnitedKingdom Company

Sanchez Computer Associates Pty Limited, anAustralian Company

Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc., SpectraSecurities Software, Inc., a Canadian Company
|       (3)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|       (4)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 23, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Seth      Shaw   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Seth      Shaw                      |   |
|                    |   | Chief      Financial Officer        |   |
|                    |   |                                |   |
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J ULY 3, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 15 61 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 4 :1 1- cr-0 00 39 -RH-WCS-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A,
Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ver su s ROBERT BRUCE GREEN, JR., Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t forth e North ern Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (J ul y 3, 2 01 2) Befo re CARNES, WILSON andANDERSON, Circu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Gwend ol yn S pi ve y , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Ro be rt B ru ce Gree n, J r., in th isdi rectap pe al , has m ov edto wit hd raw fro m fur th er re pr es en ta ti on of t he ap pe ll an t, an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o And er s v. C al if or ni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2 d 4 93 (19 67 ). Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of t he en ti re re co rdrev eal s t ha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andGreen ’s con vi ct io ns an d se nt en ces are AFFIRMED .

2
OHIO ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (OHARNG) DRINKING WATER 

PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Camp James A. Garfield (formerly known as Camp Ravenna), does not contain PFOS/PFOA 

above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army National Guard-provided drinking water complies with 

the standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the 

quality of drinking water supplied to the American public. 

Test Date: September 2017

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect

Future Testing Event: None

History: From 1941 to spring of 1993 potable water was provide at the then Ravenna Army 

Ammunition Plant by on site water treatment of groundwater. The water treatment plant was 

closed in early 1993. Buildings 1037, 1034, and F-6 were connect to two groundwater wells in 

September 1993. Two additional wells were drilled in October 2010 and buildings 1067 and 

1068 were connected to these wells. In May 2017 all four wells were tested for PFOS/PFOA 

with results published in September 2017. All the buildings were connected to potable water 

from an off-post municipal purveyor in 2018 and the wells subsequently closed in July 2021.

Type of Drinking Water System: Purchased from Portage County Water Resources owned 

(off-post municipal water purveyor)

For Questions Contact: Ohio National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 614-336-4499

Office E-mail Address: ng.oh.oharng.mbx.pao@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
# Minnesota Guard's adjutant general meets with Croatian counterparts

/ Published Sept. 27, 2013

KARLOVAC, Croatia - Maj. Gen. Richard Nash, adjutant general of the Minnesota National Guard, met with Brig. Gen. Dragutin Repinc and other Croatian leaders Wednesday at the Croatian Ministry of Defense.

"Maj. Gen. Nash is spending this week with Croatian government and military officials to discuss defense security goals and capabilities between the Minnesota National Guard and Croatian Armed Forces," said Army Lt. Col. Guy Konietzko, Minnesota National Guard International Affairs Officer."

"Minnesota and Croatia have been partnered since 1996 through the National Guard Bureau State Partnership Program." With more than 100 military-to-military engagements we have established a history of shared concepts, ideas and lessons learned in support of security cooperation objectives and Department of Defense policy goals," said Konietzko."

"The State Partnership Program links a unique component of the Department of Defense - a state's National Guard - with the armed forces or equivalent of a partner country in a cooperative, mutually beneficial relationship," said Army Maj. Gen. Richard Nash, Adjutant General of the Minnesota National Guard.

Croatia gained membership into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in 2009 and was accepted into the European Union on July 1, 2013.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000               
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                        1,571          
<SECURITIES>                    360   
<RECEIVABLES>                10,675
<ALLOWANCES>                    134
<INVENTORY>                       0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             13,468  
<PP&E>                      219,726
<DEPRECIATION>               (9,329)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              231,670  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         9,298
<BONDS>                     187,864  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       1 
<COMMON>                         29
<OTHER-SE>                   32,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>231,670  
<SALES>                      20,680 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             20,680
<CGS>                        12,102  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                17,213  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               (155)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            4,758 
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (1,136)    
<INCOME-TAX>                   (432)  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               0     
<DISCONTINUED>                    0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>              (1,384)         
<CHANGES>                         0     
<NET-INCOME>                 (2,108)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.19)    
        



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of deCODE genetics, Inc.(the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned , Kari Stefansson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Registrant, and Lance Thibault, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|                             |   | /s/ Kari  Stefansson                             |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Kari Stefansson                                  |
|                        |   | Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated: March 14,  2007 |   |                                             |
|                        |   | /s/  Lance Thibault                              |
|                        |   | Lance Thibault                                   |
|                        |   | Chief Financial  Officer and Treasurer           |
| Dated: March 14, 2007  |   |                                             |

 

----
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.3


                         SHELBOURNE PROPERTIES III, INC.
                          FORM 10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 2002


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelbourne Properties III,
Inc., (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.

Date:  November 13, 2002                             /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     Michael L. Ashner
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


Date:  November 13, 2002                             /s/ Carolyn B. Tiffany
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     Carolyn B. Tiffany
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ANTHONEE PATTERSON,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH SHELTON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 362 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# South Carolina Air Guard Supports Operation Healthy Delta

/ Published June 22, 2023

SIKESTON, Mo. – Airmen from the South Carolina Air National Guard’s 169th Fighter Wing participated in Operation Healthy Delta, providing free medical, dental and vision care to several thousand people in Missouri and Illinois June 9-23.

Operation Healthy Delta is an Innovative Readiness Training program sponsored by the Department of Defense to leverage the strength of joint forces and establish relationships in local communities.

At three sites in Missouri and Illinois, the IRT offered no-cost health care, dental care, physical therapy, prescriptions, behavioral health, and optometry services that provided next-day glasses.

More than 270 service members from the Air Force, Space Force, Army and Air National Guard, Army and Air Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and the U.S. Public Health Service participated in Operation Healthy Delta. The service members served more than 2,000 patients and performed more than 17,000 procedures valued at more than $1.6 million.

Food service specialists assigned to the 132nd Wing, Iowa National Guard, and 131st Bomb Wing, Missouri National Guard, prepared more than 11,000 hot meals to keep the providers fed and nourished.

The IRT program enabled service members to connect and empower people in underserved communities.

Along with building relationships, military personnel exercised skill sets and gained experiences uncommon to their traditional unit duties.

U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Julia Coleman, a dental administrator assigned to the 169th Medical Group, was the noncommissioned officer in charge of the dental clinic at one of the Missouri IRT sites.

“When working in a joint environment, there are several operations and techniques other branches do that we may not get to do,” said Coleman.

U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Mike Klingshirn, a public health officer with the 169th Medical Group, agreed.

“We don’t always get to see the farm-to-table process when things enter our military installations,” said Klingshirn. “This mission has offered us the opportunity to see public health from a wider scope.”

He hopes his team of Airmen see the significance in mitigating potential crises that could impact the biological and structural safety of the SCANG.

U.S. Air Force Master Sgt. Terra Davila, a noncommissioned officer in charge of the command support staff assigned to the 169th Operations Group and the first sergeant at a Missouri IRT site, said the experience had grown her perspective on leadership.

“Leadership is not just about the job but also taking care of your people,” said Davila.
REGISTRATION 83222-7 Vol.1
# 4 Air National Guard Locations Chosen for C-130J Upgrades

/ Published Sept. 15, 2023

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Air Force selected four National Guard Airlift Wings as the preferred locations to receive C-130J Super Hercules to replace their aging C-130Hs, pending environmental assessments.

Eight C-130J aircraft will be used to recapitalize the C-130H fleet at each location: the 103rd Airlift Wing (Hartford, Connecticut), 120th Airlift Wing (Great Falls, Montana), 133rd Airlift Wing (Minneapolis, Minnesota), and 182nd Airlift Wing (Peoria, Illinois).

This important series upgrade means that pilots and loadmasters will have new flight qualification requirements, since this is considered switching to a different aircraft. Any excess in manpower due to this shift will be repurposed through the Air National Guard corporate process and will vary by location. 

The Air National Guard will examine each individual unit receiving the upgraded airframe to assess when they can begin to receive the new platform.

The Air Force will conduct an environmental impact analysis at each location, expected to be completed in fiscal year 2025 before a final decision.

“C-130 aircraft are critical assets that our Minnesota Air National Guard use to transport cargo and passengers, whether it is in support of missions abroad or offering support here at home during times of floods, hurricanes, and other emergencies,” said Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.

The C-130J includes the latest avionics, a longer expected life span, better fuel efficiency and performance, increased cargo capacity, and better logistical support.

The 133rd Airlift Wing currently operates eight C-130H3 model aircraft that are more than 25 years old.

“This is a monumental step forward for Minnesota and the Minnesota National Guard,” said Maj. Gen. Shawn Manke, Minnesota National Guard’s adjutant general. “This important announcement will modernize the 133rd Airlift Wing, ensuring our Air Guard service members remain at the forefront of the future fight.”

The Connecticut National Guard said its Airmen, noncommissioned officers and officers worked diligently to prepare for the fleet upgrade at Bradley Air National Guard Base.

“As one of the oldest Air National Guard units in the country, the Flying Yankees have a tradition of excellence dating back to World War I and the advent of aviation,” the Connecticut National Guard announced. “The unit, having just celebrated their centennial anniversary, is now well postured to be relevant to Connecticut’s economy and the United States’ national defense well into the future.”

The Illinois National Guard also applauded the decision on social media.

“On behalf of wing commander Col. (Rusty) Ballard, we are thrilled to announce that the 182nd Airlift Wing has been selected as a preferred location to receive the C-130J Hercules aircraft mission.“--The Minnesota, Illinois and Connecticut National Guard contributed to this story.
#### John Hackenhull, plaintiff in error, *vs.*John R. Westbrook, defendant in error.

1. A mortgage on real property must be foreclosed in the county where the property lies, and where the judgment of foreclosure is granted in the county of the mortgagor’s residence, which is not in the county where the land is situated, the claimant of the land under a levy of the mortgage A fa., may raise the objection on the trial of the claim.

2. When the court on the trial of a claim case rejects the plaintiff’s *fi. fa.,*it is error to allow a verdict to be taken for the claimant. The plaintiff’s case should be dismissed.

Mortgage. Jurisdiction. Claim. Practice in the Superior Court. Before Judge Knight. Forsyth Superior Court. April Term, 1873.

Robert M. Barrett executed a mortgage to John Hackenhull on two lots of land lying in Forsyth county, and on one lot in Dawson county. The mortgage was recorded and foreclosed in the latter county. The execution based on said foreclosure was levied on the two lots situated in Forsyth county. To this property a claim was interposed by John R. West-brook. Upon the trial of the issue thus formed, the court, on motion of counsel for claimant, excluded the mortgage/. *fa.*upon the ground that the superior court of Dawson county had no jurisdiction of proceedings .to foreclose as against the two lots situated in Forsyth. To this ruling plaintiff excepted.

*286The court then directed the jury to return a verdict for the claimant, and plaintiff again excepted.

Error is assigned upon each of the aforesaid grounds of exception.

Wier Boyd, for plaintiff in error.

Jasper N. Dorsey, for defendant.

Trippe, Judge.

1. The court below committed no error in holding that a mortgage on land must be foreclosed in the county where the land lies. This was the provision of the act of 1799, Cobb Digest 570, and is transferred to the Code, section 3962. This being so, the claimant in this case had the right to object to the mortgage *fi. fa.*issued from the superior court of Dawsou county and to the proceeding to foreclose in that county, when the land claimed was situate in the county of Forsyth. If the judgment or record showed that the court rendering the judgment did not have jurisdiction of the subject matter, any person whose rights would be affected could, at any time, make the objection : Code, sections 3594, 3596. .

2. But it was error in the court after the rejection of tbe^/L *fa.*to direct the jury to render a verdict for the claimant. In *Baker vs. Shepherd,*37 *Georgia,*12, it was held “that when the court rejected the *plaintiff’sJi. fa.*when offered in evi-' denee in a claim case, it was error to allow a verdict to be taken for the claimant. The court should have dismissed plaintiff’s ease.”

For this reason and on this ground the judgment is reversed.
2023 AFSAM

Rapid Pistol CQB

PI2040

SHOOTER SCORE ROST # STATE/COUNTRY 

1 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 119 CO 199

2 CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 133 CO 196

3 GYSGT RANTON, CHAD W 101 VA 196

4 SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 152 CO 193

5 SFC WILLIS, RICHARD 135 KY 190

6 MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 108 AR 189

7 1SG CAPPS, JOSEPH A 111 AR 184

8 SSG FULMER, MICAH N 116 CO 183

9 SFC STAATS, JOHN A 118 AR 181

10 MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 134 ID 181

11 SFC KEENOM, DAVID D 141 TN 181

12 SFC ARCHAMBAULT, MAX 117 VT 178

13 SFC GODEL, JASON W 125 TX 176

14 SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 110 ND 175

15 WO1 DOUGLAS, JAMES 120 UK 173

16 SGT SMITH, ANDREW 140 NETHERLANDS 172

17 MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 138 UK 164

18 SGT FLEITAS, NICKOLAS 103 162

19 MAJ URICK, GRANT M 132 HI 162

20 LCPL BURGESS, MARCUS 129 UK 160

21 CPL ROWAN, BRIAN 137 UK 157

22 MAJOR ROSIE, LANCE 123 UK 156

23 SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 121 UK 155

24 SSG STEWART, JUDE O 100 VA 154

25 E-5 LUSH, TRAVIS C 105 VA 153

26 CW4 KNOTE, ANDY T 124 KY 153

27 SFC PHELPS, STEFAN S 106 VA 150

28 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX 113 NETHERLANDS 149

29 MAJ CONNERS, THOMAS J 142 149

30 CPT PANTOJA, LUIS 126 KS 149

31 SGT COLGAN, JOHNATHON 139 UK 148

32 SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 119 CO 146

33 CPL FILGATE, MICHAEL 130 UK 144

34 SFC BOLANOS, STEVEN L 104 CA 142

35 LCPL FERGUSON, ANDREW 128 UK 141

36 SGT MULLER, SHAUN P 102 VA 140

37 CPL BUSSTRA, MARTIJN 114 NETHERLANDS 134

38 E5 DUERR, DAVID C 107 CA 133

39 SSG CATT, KEVIN 122 UK 132

Page 1 of 2 Time printed: 5/2/2023 5:45:35 PM
SHOOTER SCORE ROST # STATE/COUNTRY 

40 CFN PICKLES, JOSHUA 131 UK 129

41 SPC GADZIK, TIMOTHY J 127 IL 127

42 SSG GORDON, COLIN 136 UK 126

43 MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 115 NETHERLANDS 112

44 SGT MARLAR, SAMUEL A 143 MA 107

45 PVT DOPPERT, SANTINO 112 NETHERLANDS 102

Page 2 of 2 Time printed: 5/2/2023 5:45:35 PM
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OLXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of SPACEHAB,Incorporated (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”),I, Brian K. Harrington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           the report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/Brian K. Harrington                |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian K. Harrington, Senior Vice      |
| President and Chief Financial Officer |
| December 3, 2007                      |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany thereport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as is not tobe incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

 

----