# APPENDIX A-1

United States Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality System Quick Look: Pennsylvania (1999-2008) (provided in electronic form only)

Bureau of Air Quality Department of Environmental Protection

## This page blank for copying purposes.UNITES STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

QUICKLOOK CRITERIA PARAMETERS

Oct. 15, 2009 Report Request ID: 685338 Report Code: AMP450

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID: VSH

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA
Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

42 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

CRITERIA 88101 7

SELECTED OPTIONS

EVENTS PROCESSING

MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

YES SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 Order Column

PARAMETER_CODE

STATE_CODE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

POC

DATES

EDT_ID

GLOBAL DATES

1999 Start Date End Date

2008 TribalOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 1 of 45 EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES

EDT DESCRIPTION

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 NO EVENTS

EVENTS EXCLUDED

EVENTS INCLUDED

EXCEPTIONAL EVENTS EXCLUDED

NATURAL EVENTS EXCLUDED

EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED

EXCEPTIONAL EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED

NATURAL EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDEDOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 2 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-001-0001

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0021

0021

0021

0021 Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Adams

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

NARSTO SITE -

ARENDTSVILLE

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7 1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002 118

118

118

118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

118

118

118 44.9

54.1

60.9

50.6

61.6

43.5

47.3

47.9

43.1

45.2

62.2

37.1

54.2

54.4 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

34.0

36.5

36.0

38.9

36.5

36.3

35.8

33.6

30.7

30.5

31.7

34.1

41.7

41.4 268

311

349

332

330

358

348

360

330

340

75

255

341

347 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

41.1

46.1

45.5

50.3

45.8

43.3

46.7

43.7

39.7

41.1

31.7

35.5

49.4

51.7 36.5

43.0

43.0

45.3

42.2

40.3

45.2

39.5

38.3

38.7

31.5

35.3

47.7

48.4 35.2

39.2

39.5

44.2

41.5

39.5

38.0

36.2

32.6

31.3

30.2

35.1

46.0

45.1 13.12*

13.02*

14.06

12.63

13.56

13.68

13.56

11.82

12.31

11.45

16.23*

15.63*

16.58

15.33 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 3 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0008

42-003-0021 1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021 Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

BAPC 301 39TH

STREET BLDG

#7

GLADSTONE

HIGH SCHOOL 2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 63.9

52.1

60.5

55.1

50.7

39.7

58.2

36.8

39.1

37.5

64.3 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

5

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

35.9

38.3

42.5

37.6

39.8

30.3

38.3

35.7

33.2

35.0

39.1 352

348

358

357

341

352

57

59

55

58

82 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

59.2

47.4

60.4

51.5

47.7

38.3

38.3

35.7

33.2

35.0

39.1 41.0

44.1

53.8

49.3

45.9

35.2

27.8

28.6

31.6

32.0

38.8 39.5

43.9

48.1

43.1

45.7

34.6

27.7

27.7

31.0

29.4

35.2 15.20

15.46

15.82

14.40

14.89

12.87

16.21

13.82

15.47

13.03

16.57* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 4 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0021

42-003-0021

42-003-0021

42-003-0021

42-003-0021

42-003-0021

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021 Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny GLADSTONE

HIGH SCHOOL

GLADSTONE

HIGH SCHOOL

GLADSTONE

HIGH SCHOOL

GLADSTONE

HIGH SCHOOL

GLADSTONE

HIGH SCHOOL

GLADSTONE

HIGH SCHOOL

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 35.0

57.0

49.0

54.9

53.8

57.7

60.5

78.5

98.6

69.6

101.7

94.0

100.3 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

33.7

56.3

40.2

30.7

39.7

35.1

49.3

64.2

63.9

59.9

66.6

68.5

69.6 99

108

115

108

108

112

190

328

337

355

359

350

355 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

33.7

56.3

43.3

40.0

44.6

38.3

58.4

71.1

90.2

63.4

85.2

82.2

84.9 33.1

40.7

40.2

30.7

39.7

35.1

58.0

70.2

81.0

62.6

80.4

71.5

83.1 32.9

40.7

36.2

28.1

36.4

34.7

49.3

68.6

71.9

61.9

76.1

71.3

77.8 14.85*

15.81*

14.55

14.56

14.10

15.35

18.80*

20.92

23.05

20.30

20.21

20.66

21.41 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 5 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0064

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067 1

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021 Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Liberty

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

2743
Washington

Blvd

OLD OAKDALE

ROAD, SOUTH

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE

ROAD, SOUTH

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE

ROAD, SOUTH

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE 2006

2007

2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 100.7

61.7

70.8

85.6

52.3

56.9

59.2

56.4

34.2

50.5

49.7 Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

58.4

54.7

50.0

84.2

49.9

49.3

47.7

37.0

32.0

37.0

47.6 345

359

358

54

60

57

55

71

83

98

105 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

82.1

58.7

66.9

84.2

49.9

49.3

47.7

37.0

32.0

37.0

47.6 68.0

58.7

63.2

63.7

48.6

42.7

46.5

28.6

32.0

32.6

37.0 60.6

58.0

62.7

48.2

48.5

41.0

46.2

28.0

30.7

32.4

31.6 19.03

18.88

17.00

23.18*

17.73

19.60

17.98

14.98*

14.09*

14.04*

12.31* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 6 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0067

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0093 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021 Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

McCandless
Township

McCandless
Township

McCandless
Township

McCandless
Township Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny ROAD, SOUTH

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE

ROAD, SOUTH

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE

ROAD, SOUTH

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE

ROAD, SOUTH

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE

ROAD, SOUTH

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE

ROAD, SOUTH

FAYETTE

OLD OAKDALE

ROAD, SOUTH

FAYETTE

PEARCE MILL

ROAD NORTH

PARK

PEARCE MILL

ROAD NORTH

PARK

PEARCE MILL

ROAD NORTH

PARK

PEARCE MILL

ROAD NORTH

PARK 2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 52.0

47.2

48.9

29.3

43.6

30.8

26.3

33.9

37.9

57.9 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

42.1

42.2

34.1

28.6

42.4

25.5

26.3

33.9

37.9

52.5 99

101

110

98

98

108

17

43

48

56 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

42.1

42.2

37.0

28.6

42.4

30.5

22.4

32.8

36.0

52.5 37.7

35.6

34.1

28.0

40.7

25.5

20.8

31.7

35.0

29.4 29.9

30.3

32.8

27.8

37.6

24.7

20.5

29.7

33.4

25.4 13.23*

13.00*

14.22

11.14*

13.47*

10.77

11.99*

14.49*

14.87*

13.63 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 7 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0093

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0095 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021 McCandless
Township

McCandless
Township

McCandless
Township

McCandless
Township

McCandless
Township

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Coraopolis Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny PEARCE MILL

ROAD NORTH

PARK

PEARCE MILL

ROAD NORTH

PARK

PEARCE MILL

ROAD NORTH

PARK

PEARCE MILL

ROAD NORTH

PARK

PEARCE MILL

ROAD NORTH

PARK

1000 BEAVER

GRADE RD

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER

GRADE RD

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER

GRADE RD

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER

GRADE RD

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER

GRADE RD

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER

GRADE RD

CORAOPOLIS PA 2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 56.6

47.2

50.7

37.2

39.6

54.2

31.1

38.4

50.0

53.7

46.7 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

56.6

47.2

50.7

37.2

32.9

54.2

31.1

38.4

46.2

38.6

46.6 50

48

49

46

55

27

36

45

55

53

52 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

30.5

43.6

41.3

28.6

32.9

30.3

27.5

31.7

46.2

38.6

46.6 26.6

32.7

27.8

27.2

28.7

29.0

25.5

30.2

30.2

30.2

31.0 26.1

31.7

25.4

20.0

27.5

25.9

22.4

30.1

29.3

28.3

30.2 13.96*

12.28*

14.44*

11.50*

13.02

15.63*

13.38*

15.33*

13.63*

15.71

13.26 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 8 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0095

42-003-0097

42-003-0097

42-003-0116

42-003-0116

42-003-0116

42-003-0116

42-003-0116 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021 Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Coraopolis

Not in a city

Not in a city

Stowe
(Township of)

Stowe
(Township of)

Stowe
(Township of)

Stowe
(Township of)

Stowe
(Township of) Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny 1000 BEAVER

GRADE RD

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER

GRADE RD

CORAOPOLIS PA

1000 BEAVER

GRADE RD

CORAOPOLIS PA

BEAVER ROAD

LEETSDALE

BEAVER ROAD

LEETSDALE

405 WHEELER

AVE, MCKEES

ROCKS, PA

15132

405 WHEELER

AVE, MCKEES

ROCKS, PA

15132

405 WHEELER

AVE, MCKEES

ROCKS, PA

15132

405 WHEELER

AVE, MCKEES

ROCKS, PA

15132

405 WHEELER

AVE, MCKEES

ROCKS, PA

15132 2005

2006

2007

1999

2000

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 45.2

47.2

40.7

46.8

39.3

60.1

35.7

53.2

40.5

59.9 Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

37.0

36.7

32.8

46.8

39.3

50.0

33.2

51.7

38.4

42.9 56

53

56

18

38

84

94

107

107

108 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

37.0

36.7

32.8

25.9

32.2

50.0

33.2

51.7

38.4

45.9 27.9

36.6

28.8

25.2

27.3

34.2

32.0

44.5

36.4

42.9 27.7

29.3

28.2

24.5

27.0

32.8

31.3

37.6

33.1

37.8 14.67

12.38

13.64

21.20*

15.22*

16.99*

15.39*

15.59*

14.20

15.28 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 9 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0116

42-003-0116

42-003-0131

42-003-0131

42-003-0131

42-003-0131

42-003-0131

42-003-0133

42-003-0133 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021 Stowe
(Township of)

Stowe
(Township of)

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny 405 WHEELER

AVE, MCKEES

ROCKS, PA

15132

405 WHEELER

AVE, MCKEES

ROCKS, PA

15132

WAVE

POOL,SOUTH

PARK, SOUTH

PARK TWP, PA

WAVE

POOL,SOUTH

PARK, SOUTH

PARK TWP, PA

WAVE

POOL,SOUTH

PARK, SOUTH

PARK TWP, PA

WAVE

POOL,SOUTH

PARK, SOUTH

PARK TWP, PA

WAVE

POOL,SOUTH

PARK, SOUTH

PARK TWP, PA

5118 DORRIS

DRIVE,

ELIZABETH

5118 DORRIS

DRIVE, 2004

2005

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2003

2004 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 57.6

54.8

67.4

36.4

40.6

48.6

16.2

53.9

61.1 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

45.5

39.3

67.4

36.4

40.6

33.0

16.2

53.9

36.1 112

106

25

48

50

51

6

49

58 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

47.9

44.1

36.0

33.2

35.3

33.0

12.1

35.6

36.1 45.5

39.3

33.4

32.7

33.3

27.3

11.4

29.9

35.6 40.4

33.5

31.4

31.7

32.2

25.5

10.7

28.9

33.5 14.68*

16.15

17.93*

14.48*

14.85*

13.51

9.98*

14.44

13.52 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 10 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-0133

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008

42-003-1008 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021 Elizabeth

Harrison
Township

Harrison
Township

Harrison
Township

Harrison
Township

Harrison
Township

Harrison
Township

Harrison
Township

Harrison
Township

Harrison
Township

Harrison Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny ELIZABETH

5118 DORRIS

DRIVE,

ELIZABETH

PACIFIC &

IDAHO AVE,

NATRONA

PACIFIC &

IDAHO AVE,

NATRONA

PACIFIC &

IDAHO AVE,

NATRONA

PACIFIC &

IDAHO AVE,

NATRONA

PACIFIC &

IDAHO AVE,

NATRONA

PACIFIC &

IDAHO AVE,

NATRONA

PACIFIC &

IDAHO AVE,

NATRONA

PACIFIC &

IDAHO AVE,

NATRONA

PACIFIC &

IDAHO AVE,

NATRONA

PACIFIC & 2005

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 27.7

70.8

42.4

60.2

57.0

55.9

49.4

50.8

44.4

51.8

41.3 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

27.7

40.3

41.6

48.1

46.2

41.9

45.4

41.3

37.8

39.9

32.1 49

81

102

99

120

111

85

118

103

111

107 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

27.3

40.3

41.6

48.1

53.3

44.5

45.4

41.5

38.9

43.9

39.2 25.6

40.3

38.4

39.9

46.2

41.9

38.5

41.3

37.8

39.9

32.1 25.1

39.6

37.1

38.9

41.9

36.5

36.9

37.8

31.3

38.4

31.4 14.04

17.45*

16.09*

16.11*

16.09

15.50

15.02*

15.95

14.03

15.06

13.39 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 11 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021 Township

North

Braddock

North

Braddock

North

Braddock

North

Braddock

North

Braddock

North

Braddock

North

Braddock

North

Braddock

North

Braddock

North

Braddock Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny IDAHO AVE,

NATRONA

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK 1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 68.9

40.8

57.2

59.3

65.3

54.8

60.9

41.5

50.0

38.4 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

39.7

39.7

51.7

41.9

50.4

38.3

38.6

38.1

43.7

36.3 79

88

109

114

104

107

111

104

110

105 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

39.7

39.7

51.7

42.2

50.4

44.2

39.6

40.0

47.0

37.3 38.8

36.9

44.7

41.9

38.3

38.3

38.6

38.1

43.7

36.3 36.1

36.5

41.7

41.3

36.0

37.0

37.0

36.4

43.1

36.2 17.69*

16.45*

17.09*

16.92

16.80*

15.79

17.16

15.03

16.38

14.15 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 12 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-1301

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-3007

42-003-9002

42-003-9002 2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0021 North

Braddock

North

Braddock

North

Braddock

North

Braddock

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Clairton

Springdale

Springdale Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny 600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

600 ANDERSON

ST, N.

BRADDOCK

501 Waddell

Ave

501 Waddell

Ave

501 Waddell

Ave

501 Waddell

Ave

501 Waddell

Ave

501 Waddell

Ave

501 Waddell

Ave

501 Waddell

Ave

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR 2005

2006

2007

2008

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 61.5

41.7

42.5

38.5

47.2

51.6

59.3

43.2

57.3

38.7

40.4

40.6

72.8

33.4 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

61.5

39.5

35.4

37.7

44.5

50.4

58.8

39.8

30.9

35.8

35.0

34.6

72.8

33.4 50

56

53

56

55

56

60

55

57

59

55

58

43

51 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

37.5

39.5

35.4

37.7

44.5

50.4

58.8

39.8

30.9

35.8

35.0

34.6

38.0

32.8 36.0

37.8

33.5

36.3

37.9

39.8

37.0

36.2

29.1

29.1

31.8

30.7

34.2

32.6 32.5

30.2

31.5

30.9

36.5

37.5

30.7

33.1

27.6

28.4

30.0

29.3

31.5

32.0 18.24*

15.45

16.73

14.21

18.65*

16.00

17.02

13.80

16.36

14.49

15.11

13.32

16.48*

14.76 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 13 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-003-9002

42-003-9002

42-003-9002

42-003-9002

42-003-9002

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0021

0021

0021

0021

0021

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Springdale

Springdale

Springdale

Springdale

Springdale

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Allegheny

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver HIGH, COLFAX

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX

& BUTLER

SPRINGDALE JR

HIGH, COLFAX

& BUTLER

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 41.9

56.7

58.6

45.6

50.6

45.5

61.7

58.4

55.4

43.6 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

41.9

52.8

33.4

41.4

38.8

43.6

49.3

37.7

33.8

43.0 51

55

57

57

55

99

102

119

115

119 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

33.4

52.8

33.4

41.4

38.8

43.6

50.0

46.2

35.2

43.1 32.7

34.3

31.0

32.3

27.9

36.7

49.3

37.7

33.8

43.0 32.6

28.8

29.1

32.2

26.1

35.7

42.4

35.9

32.2

42.9 14.84*

13.92*

15.95

12.49

14.88

16.14*

17.19*

15.26

15.67

15.38 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 14 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-007-0014 1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver

Beaver EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY 2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 61.9

41.1

38.9

37.2

18.1

35.6

9.9

24.2

18.1

51.4

47.8 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

51.8

37.0

38.2

31.2

18.1

35.6

9.9

24.2

18.1

51.4

33.6 109

107

99

114

6

10

1

2

3

48

53 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

53.6

39.0

38.2

32.4

17.8

33.6

9.0

14.3

30.4

33.6 51.8

37.0

37.6

31.2

12.8

20.4

6.4

28.1

33.3 39.5

33.5

36.4

30.4

11.6

18.0

28.0

31.0 18.30

14.87

15.72*

13.69

11.53*

16.25*

9.90*

16.60*

12.93*

16.64*

15.00 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 15 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-007-0014

42-007-0014

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

42-011-0009

42-011-0009 2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Beaver Falls

Beaver Falls

Reading

Reading

Reading

Reading

Reading

Reading

Reading Beaver

Beaver

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

EIGHT STREET

AND RIVER

ALLEY

UGI CO

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT

ST

UGI CO

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT

ST

UGI CO

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT

ST

UGI CO

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT

ST

UGI CO

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT

ST

UGI CO

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT

ST

UGI CO

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT 2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 36.3

36.9

36.3

55.2

55.2

52.4

76.1

41.2

45.7 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

35.3

36.9

35.7

37.5

43.0

48.5

45.0

33.1

39.4 58

48

91

113

120

108

119

114

118 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

35.3

30.9

35.7

47.4

44.0

48.5

46.5

37.5

43.0 31.2

29.3

32.5

37.5

43.0

48.5

45.0

33.1

39.4 30.2

28.5

30.4

37.2

42.5

40.3

44.5

33.1

38.1 16.55

14.26*

13.51*

16.87

16.49

16.66*

16.14

15.64

16.80 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 16 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-011-0009

42-011-0010

42-011-0010

42-011-0011

42-011-0011

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-017-0012

42-021-0011

42-021-0011 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Reading

Reading

Reading

Not in a city

Not in a city

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Bristol

Johnstown

Johnstown Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

Berks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Bucks

Cambria

Cambria ST

UGI CO

MONGANTOWN RD

AND PROSPECT

ST

503 NORTH 6TH

STREET

503 NORTH 6TH

STREET

1059 Arnold

Road

1059 Arnold

Road

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

ROCKVIEW LANE

MILLER AUTO

SHOP 1

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO

SHOP 1

MESSENGER ST 2006

2006

2007

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 36.9

49.5

43.6

36.5

36.5

33.3

39.3

47.9

49.7

55.9

39.8

37.7

38.6

37.3

37.5

52.6

38.3 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

36.9

39.4

43.6

33.9

28.4

32.8

38.4

38.5

37.2

39.6

29.9

35.4

34.2

35.0

30.9

31.0

34.1 43

71

47

60

116

67

100

117

110

113

108

110

104

103

103

80

101 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

31.9

39.4

36.2

33.9

30.4

32.8

38.4

42.5

40.6

40.9

30.4

37.1

38.2

35.9

36.7

31.0

35.4 31.4

35.1

28.1

33.7

28.4

30.2

36.6

38.5

37.2

39.6

29.9

35.4

34.2

35.0

30.9

30.7

34.1 31.0

33.3

26.5

28.1

27.4

28.0

35.7

33.2

37.0

37.4

28.7

35.3

32.5

30.5

29.6

29.3

30.4 12.17*

14.87*

13.26*

15.28*

12.48

12.00*

13.64*

14.47

14.15

14.42

13.04*

14.34

12.15*

13.02*

12.66*

14.78*

15.34* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 17 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-021-0011

42-027-0100

42-027-0100 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

Johnstown

State College

State College Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Cambria

Centre

Centre MILLER AUTO

SHOP 1

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO

SHOP 1

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO

SHOP 1

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO

SHOP 1

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO

SHOP 1

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO

SHOP 1

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO

SHOP 1

MESSENGER ST

MILLER AUTO

SHOP 1

MESSENGER ST

PENN STATE

UNIVERSITY -

ARBORETUM

SITE

PENN STATE

UNIVERSITY -

ARBORETUM

SITE 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 42.8

54.3

54.7

52.4

44.9

41.6

36.3

36.4

39.7

53.5 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

40.1

46.6

36.8

36.2

43.2

39.0

34.6

32.2

34.0

41.4 112

120

116

116

118

116

108

122

70

311 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

42.1

54.2

40.9

37.7

44.1

39.3

34.7

32.6

34.0

47.3 40.1

46.6

36.8

36.2

43.2

39.0

34.6

32.2

31.3

47.1 39.4

40.2

36.3

34.9

39.6

33.4

33.5

31.9

25.6

46.0 15.85

16.09

15.46

14.42

16.80

14.78

14.42*

13.86

11.71*

13.72 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 18 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-027-0100

42-029-0100

42-029-0100 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 State College

State College

State College

State College

State College

State College

State College

Not in a city

Not in a city Centre

Centre

Centre

Centre

Centre

Centre

Centre

Chester

Chester PENN STATE

UNIVERSITY -

ARBORETUM

SITE

PENN STATE

UNIVERSITY -

ARBORETUM

SITE

PENN STATE

UNIVERSITY -

ARBORETUM

SITE

PENN STATE

UNIVERSITY -

ARBORETUM

SITE

PENN STATE

UNIVERSITY -

ARBORETUM

SITE

PENN STATE

UNIVERSITY -

ARBORETUM

SITE

PENN STATE

UNIVERSITY -

ARBORETUM

SITE

NEW GARDEN

AIRPORT -

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN

AIRPORT - 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2002

2003 118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

118 93.7

62.5

48.1

49.1

43.5

44.2

37.6

54.9

73.1 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

36.4

35.4

37.8

39.7

31.7

33.1

29.7

33.7

38.5 260

344

348

344

352

358

359

110

118 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

51.3

44.0

45.5

48.6

39.7

41.2

35.9

33.8

42.2 42.2

43.7

44.9

42.4

39.5

36.3

35.0

33.7

38.5 39.4

43.4

40.7

42.1

39.2

36.2

32.9

33.7

37.7 11.78*

13.56

13.33

13.39

11.38

11.93

10.79

14.61

15.57 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 19 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-029-0100

42-029-0100

42-029-0100

42-029-0100

42-029-0100

42-041-0100

42-041-0100

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

42-041-0101 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Carlisle

Carlisle

Carlisle

Carlisle

Carlisle Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN

AIRPORT -

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN

AIRPORT -

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN

AIRPORT -

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN

AIRPORT -

TOUGHKENAMON

NEW GARDEN

AIRPORT -

TOUGHKENAMON

210 NORTH

MIDDLESEX

ROAD

210 NORTH

MIDDLESEX

ROAD

IMPERIAL

COURT

IMPERIAL

COURT

IMPERIAL

COURT

IMPERIAL

COURT

IMPERIAL

COURT 2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 40.5

41.2

41.6

42.2

38.5

54.7

59.4

65.5

53.2

66.7

55.4

43.1 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

32.7

33.7

38.3

38.1

32.0

37.3

52.4

36.1

41.5

41.6

39.1

40.1 101

93

92

92

102

289

86

260

344

349

343

345 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

38.9

33.7

38.3

38.1

36.7

41.4

52.4

45.0

51.8

47.0

45.2

43.0 32.7

33.3

31.2

32.9

32.0

40.2

49.0

43.3

47.5

46.5

43.1

42.5 30.6

33.0

31.1

30.6

28.7

39.7

48.6

38.2

47.1

43.5

39.8

42.1 14.25*

15.87*

12.59*

14.07*

13.68*

13.97*

17.55*

14.30

14.35

15.31

15.13

14.93 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 20 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

42-041-0101

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Carlisle

Carlisle

Carlisle

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg Cumberland

Cumberland

Cumberland

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin IMPERIAL

COURT

IMPERIAL

COURT

IMPERIAL

COURT

1833 UPS

DRIVE

HARRISBURG

PA

1833 UPS

DRIVE

HARRISBURG

PA

1833 UPS

DRIVE

HARRISBURG

PA

1833 UPS

DRIVE

HARRISBURG

PA

1833 UPS

DRIVE

HARRISBURG

PA

1833 UPS

DRIVE

HARRISBURG

PA

1833 UPS

DRIVE

HARRISBURG 2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

145

145 53.3

43.5

46.0

49.7

65.9

61.7

52.6

70.9

55.7

52.1 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

33.3

35.3

33.7

39.7

45.8

47.7

40.1

41.5

35.5

40.1 335

329

355

244

283

350

348

336

354

338 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

43.8

37.7

42.4

43.5

58.5

58.6

52.5

56.7

46.7

49.9 42.9

36.8

36.8

40.7

49.4

52.0

48.9

48.5

45.9

42.9 34.8

36.5

36.7

40.4

47.9

50.5

45.8

47.1

43.8

41.0 13.00

13.70

13.03

14.39*

15.69*

16.50

14.50

16.18

15.66

15.51 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 21 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-043-0401

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Harrisburg

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester Dauphin

Dauphin

Dauphin

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware PA

1833 UPS

DRIVE

HARRISBURG

PA

1833 UPS

DRIVE

HARRISBURG

PA

1833 UPS

DRIVE

HARRISBURG

PA

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST & 2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008 145

145

145

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 51.9

41.6

43.7

37.2

46.9

47.2

58.1

64.4

38.8

40.9

38.6

37.4

36.5 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

37.0

35.6

34.3

35.9

36.2

39.5

31.9

37.8

30.5

37.0

36.7

34.5

28.6 346

335

347

94

112

118

115

115

113

110

102

96

105 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

48.0

39.9

43.2

35.9

44.9

42.7

40.1

40.5

37.5

40.1

38.0

34.5

35.0 44.5

37.9

39.8

31.6

36.2

39.5

31.9

37.8

30.5

37.0

36.7

34.0

28.6 43.8

37.1

38.7

29.3

34.2

38.8

30.7

37.0

30.5

36.9

31.9

33.6

28.2 13.95

14.28

13.18

13.12*

15.99

15.86

14.73

15.29

15.02

16.51

13.99*

14.45

13.84 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 22 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-045-0002

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003 2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Chester

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Delaware

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

FRONT ST &

NORRIS ST

10TH AND

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND

MARNE STREETS 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

145 26.2

20.0

11.6

36.1

13.2

39.5

38.6

31.9

39.5

30.5

37.5

49.3

52.8

46.4

38.7 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

26.2

20.0

11.6

36.1

13.2

39.3

32.9

26.1

28.2

30.5

28.2

37.5

42.9

29.7

32.5 6

2

2

13

2

51

52

56

51

38

59

264

299

265

357 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

19.7

7.6

11.6

34.5

4.4

39.3

32.9

26.1

28.2

27.6

28.2

41.5

49.9

38.0

37.1 14.6

21.5

36.1

27.4

25.8

26.8

24.6

27.3

40.2

44.7

32.1

36.1 8.2

15.7

35.8

26.9

25.3

25.8

23.6

26.1

38.9

44.6

31.8

35.9 13.25*

13.80*

11.60*

23.71*

8.80*

16.91*

14.41

15.02

14.09*

12.62*

13.99*

13.83*

13.21*

12.56*

11.88 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 23 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-049-0003

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton Erie

Erie

Erie

Erie

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna 10TH AND

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND

MARNE STREETS

10TH AND

MARNE STREETS

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON 2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004 145

145

145

145

118

118

118

118

118

145 72.3

37.0

41.1

64.9

58.0

43.1

49.3

54.2

57.9

47.2 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

40.7

30.2

35.1

28.8

29.7

31.5

36.7

42.7

33.8

31.2 338

296

316

341

259

343

337

344

342

343 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

48.0

36.0

40.2

35.2

39.8

39.0

43.0

53.4

48.3

36.5 47.5

33.0

39.8

34.2

37.4

38.9

39.8

50.2

41.4

33.1 44.6

32.9

38.1

32.6

31.2

33.0

39.5

46.8

38.8

33.0 14.35

11.32*

12.06

10.72

11.00*

11.67

12.73

12.45

12.46

11.60 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 24 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-069-2006

42-071-0007

42-071-0007 1

1

1

1

2

2

2

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Scranton

Lancaster

Lancaster Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lackawanna

Lancaster

Lancaster GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

GEORGE ST

TROOP AND

CITY OF

SCRANTON

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM 2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001

2003

1999

2000 145

145

145

145

118

118

118

118

118 49.9

47.4

44.4

38.2

21.2

16.4

8.2

46.1

67.2 Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

32.8

28.7

32.0

27.7

21.2

16.4

8.2

38.2

47.4 341

333

334

349

4

4

3

89

98 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

42.2

38.3

40.4

35.2

14.8

15.3

5.7

38.2

47.4 40.8

35.6

36.6

32.9

10.4

10.6

5.5

34.5

47.0 38.5

34.1

35.6

28.0

9.0

6.0

33.6

41.1 12.49

10.61

11.28

10.06

12.70*

11.78*

6.47*

15.64*

18.22* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 25 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 58.4

51.3

71.6

43.6

57.5

55.8

42.9

42.8 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

42.1

40.2

51.5

35.5

45.2

34.9

39.6

35.0 114

115

119

120

121

117

117

114 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

49.9

47.8

55.7

35.9

49.0

41.0

41.3

39.2 42.1

40.2

51.5

35.5

45.2

34.9

39.6

35.0 40.2

35.5

46.9

35.4

41.2

34.5

37.2

34.7 17.11

16.15

17.62

16.64

18.19

14.11

15.40

13.93 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 26 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-071-0007

42-077-0004

42-077-0004

42-077-0004

42-077-0004 2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Allentown

Allentown

Allentown

Allentown Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lancaster

Lehigh

Lehigh

Lehigh

Lehigh HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

ABRAHAM

LINCOLN JR

HIGH

GROFFTOWN RD

STATE

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER

AVE

STATE

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER

AVE

STATE

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER

AVE

STATE

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER 2000

2001

2002

2003

1999

2000

2001

2002 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 29.3

33.7

15.9

25.2

35.0

57.2

70.5

50.1 Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

29.3

33.7

15.9

25.2

31.5

38.2

42.8

38.9 10

5

1

2

185

322

317

318 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

25.6

26.9

9.5

34.6

46.3

55.0

45.0 22.2

20.2

32.0

44.0

54.7

42.4 17.4

9.6

31.5

43.6

54.4

41.3 15.51*

17.42*

15.90*

17.35*

11.89*

14.26

15.10*

13.15* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 27 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-077-0004

42-077-0004

42-077-0004

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

42-079-1101

42-079-1101 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Allentown

Allentown

Allentown

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre

Wilkes-Barre Lehigh

Lehigh

Lehigh

Luzerne

Luzerne

Luzerne

Luzerne

Luzerne

Luzerne

Luzerne AVE

STATE

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER

AVE

STATE

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER

AVE

STATE

HOSPITAL REAR

1600 HANOVER

AVE

CHILWICK &

WASHINGTON

STS

CHILWICK &

WASHINGTON

STS

CHILWICK &

WASHINGTON

STS

CHILWICK &

WASHINGTON

STS

CHILWICK &

WASHINGTON

STS

CHILWICK &

WASHINGTON

STS

CHILWICK & 2003

2004

2005

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005 118

145

145

118

118

118

118

118

145

145 69.3

53.6

55.4

50.6

43.0

52.6

44.2

69.6

45.5

48.4 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

36.6

35.9

36.7

32.8

32.9

37.4

28.2

35.1

30.8

31.5 307

358

351

252

345

347

293

350

347

356 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

46.4

42.1

47.7

50.4

42.8

49.3

39.2

61.9

36.9

41.4 44.9

39.6

45.8

40.0

41.1

46.7

37.8

41.4

36.3

38.4 44.2

37.2

44.6

37.8

34.5

39.5

36.9

40.9

35.6

36.9 15.02*

14.03

14.48

12.54*

12.65

13.71

11.99*

13.06

12.21

13.01 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 28 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-085-0100

42-091-0013 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Farrell

Norristown Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Mercer

Montgomery WASHINGTON

STS

PA518 (NEW

CASTLE ROAD)

& PA418

PA518 (NEW

CASTLE ROAD)

& PA418

PA518 (NEW

CASTLE ROAD)

& PA418

PA518 (NEW

CASTLE ROAD)

& PA418

PA518 (NEW

CASTLE ROAD)

& PA418

PA518 (NEW

CASTLE ROAD)

& PA418

PA518 (NEW

CASTLE ROAD)

& PA418

PA518 (NEW

CASTLE ROAD)

& PA418

PA518 (NEW

CASTLE ROAD)

& PA418

STATE ARMORY

- 1046

BELVOIR RD 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999 118

118

118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118 34.9

55.0

50.5

54.9

39.3

53.2

38.6

42.0

40.2

35.3 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

30.3

43.9

36.6

35.4

34.5

39.0

30.7

34.9

30.3

31.3 53

310

327

331

346

340

302

335

334

78 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

30.3

51.0

49.6

53.3

37.7

46.9

35.4

41.8

33.7

31.3 29.9

46.2

39.9

47.1

36.9

45.9

34.2

40.9

33.0

30.2 28.1

45.9

39.1

38.8

35.1

42.6

33.7

36.8

32.8

29.8 14.72*

15.07*

14.02

13.77

13.37

14.09

11.84*

13.16

11.61

13.02* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 29 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-091-0013

42-095-0025

42-095-0025 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Norristown

Freemansburg

Freemansburg Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Montgomery

Northampton

Northampton STATE ARMORY

- 1046

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY

- 1046

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY

- 1046

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY

- 1046

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY

- 1046

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY

- 1046

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY

- 1046

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY

- 1046

BELVOIR RD

STATE ARMORY

- 1046

BELVOIR RD

WASHINGTON &

CAMBRIA STS.

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON &

CAMBRIA STS.

FREEMANSBURG 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 39.6

59.0

49.7

64.0

39.3

35.2

39.0

39.7

37.2

36.0

52.3 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

31.5

47.6

36.8

37.5

28.8

32.0

36.4

30.1

23.7

31.3

37.3 106

115

118

111

102

86

109

112

109

180

298 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

37.5

49.7

37.4

43.9

29.3

32.0

36.6

35.7

30.3

34.7

44.0 31.5

47.6

36.8

37.5

28.8

31.5

36.4

30.1

23.7

32.5

40.9 30.0

38.0

33.6

33.6

27.0

30.3

29.9

28.2

23.5

31.3

39.0 13.47*

14.88

13.60

13.86

12.00*

12.48*

12.05

13.09

11.66

12.85*

13.69* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 30 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-095-0025

42-099-0301

42-099-0301 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Freemansburg

Not in a city

Not in a city Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Northampton

Perry

Perry WASHINGTON &

CAMBRIA STS.

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON &

CAMBRIA STS.

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON &

CAMBRIA STS.

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON &

CAMBRIA STS.

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON &

CAMBRIA STS.

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON &

CAMBRIA STS.

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON &

CAMBRIA STS.

FREEMANSBURG

WASHINGTON &

CAMBRIA STS.

FREEMANSBURG

ROUTE 34

LITTLE

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

ROUTE 34

LITTLE

BUFFALO STATE

PARK 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001 118

118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

118 73.5

59.7

65.9

54.5

55.9

42.7

46.2

40.4

34.2

35.1 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

42.9

40.9

37.0

35.2

36.2

38.3

37.9

33.1

30.2

33.7 317

334

351

351

348

342

347

360

110

116 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

61.7

46.5

49.9

41.6

48.1

41.0

42.7

40.1

32.0

34.7 55.7

46.2

47.4

39.4

45.9

40.4

40.4

39.2

30.2

33.7 50.9

46.2

45.5

38.5

44.4

39.6

39.9

37.4

26.4

31.5 15.33

14.10

14.31

13.71

14.20

12.75

13.31

12.26

12.34

12.57 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 31 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-099-0301

42-099-0301

42-099-0301

42-099-0301

42-101-0003

42-101-0003

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861 Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia Perry

Perry

Perry

Perry

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia ROUTE 34

LITTLE

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

ROUTE 34

LITTLE

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

ROUTE 34

LITTLE

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

ROUTE 34

LITTLE

BUFFALO STATE

PARK

COMM HEALTH

SERVICES 500

S BROAD

STREET

COMM HEALTH

SERVICES 500

S BROAD

STREET

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB 2002

2003

2004

2005

2005

2006

1999

2000

2001 118

118

118

118

120

120

120

000

000 47.2

58.7

35.4

36.4

29.1

31.7

50.5

48.0

48.9 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

36.9

34.5

27.9

29.0

29.0

28.8

38.9

41.2

40.2 115

109

121

118

62

111

233

285

325 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

40.8

38.0

28.2

29.0

29.0

29.1

46.9

46.7

48.2 36.9

34.5

27.9

29.0

27.9

28.8

42.3

45.4

45.9 33.6

31.8

27.4

28.2

27.0

27.8

40.4

42.5

45.5 13.22

13.09*

12.23

13.12

14.35*

10.47*

14.64*

14.93*

16.47 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 32 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0004

42-101-0014 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

1 0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861 Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia 1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

1501 E

LYCOMING AVE

AMS LAB

ROXY WATER

PUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2006

2007

2008

2002 120

000

000

000

145

145

145

120

000

145

120 53.9

58.6

50.2

48.3

42.0

40.9

40.8

40.3

35.6

39.8

30.2 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

39.7

39.9

34.3

35.9

37.9

35.4

34.5

35.5

35.6

33.4

30.2 331

322

335

268

275

332

354

57

47

54

16 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

45.4

51.5

40.1

47.8

40.8

38.9

40.1

35.5

31.8

33.4

27.1 43.3

48.0

38.2

39.1

40.5

37.6

38.1

28.0

26.3

21.9

24.2 43.2

40.7

37.6

37.0

40.0

36.9

37.7

28.0

26.0

20.9

24.2 14.38

14.80

13.89

14.21*

13.48*

13.74

13.01

13.22

14.07*

12.51

14.54* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 33 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0014

42-101-0014

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

42-101-0020

42-101-0020 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861 Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia ROXY WATER

PUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS

ROXY WATER

PUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS

FORD RDBELMONT AVE

WATER TREAT

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE

WATER TREAT

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE

WATER TREAT

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE

WATER TREAT

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE

WATER TREAT

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE

WATER TREAT

PLANT

FORD RDBELMONT AVE

WATER TREAT 2003

2004

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005 120

120

120

120

120

120

120

120

120 60.7

15.3

40.3

41.9

46.7

53.8

48.4

41.5

33.4 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

39.3

15.3

29.8

31.8

36.1

34.4

39.3

29.3

33.4 73

5

81

91

104

116

108

110

19 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

39.3

12.7

29.8

31.8

37.7

39.7

39.9

40.1

26.5 34.4

11.1

29.8

26.9

36.1

34.4

39.3

29.3

21.3 31.6

10.8

28.9

26.7

34.3

31.6

35.1

29.0

21.3 13.25*

11.12*

13.30*

14.71*

15.39*

13.76

13.67

13.88*

15.51* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 34 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0024

42-101-0027 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861 Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia PLANT

GRANT-ASHTON

ROADS PHILA

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON

ROADS PHILA

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON

ROADS PHILA

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON

ROADS PHILA

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON

ROADS PHILA

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON

ROADS PHILA

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON

ROADS PHILA

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON

ROADS PHILA

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON

ROADS PHILA

NE AIRPORT

GRANT-ASHTON

ROADS PHILA

NE AIRPORT

S W CORNER 1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000 120

120

120

120

120

120

000

145

145

145

120 35.9

40.1

51.8

52.8

55.6

50.1

48.2

46.9

40.8

39.4

56.8 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

32.5

37.5

37.1

33.7

38.7

33.4

35.8

34.7

33.5

30.5

56.8 64

95

118

113

108

333

229

255

321

356

47 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

32.5

37.5

39.6

38.2

40.9

41.1

44.8

42.6

40.4

38.2

37.3 28.3

32.2

37.1

33.7

38.7

37.7

38.4

39.0

35.6

37.2

36.1 26.0

27.5

35.1

33.7

32.7

37.6

36.1

36.1

34.9

34.7

33.8 12.95*

14.66*

14.62

13.66

13.19*

12.78

12.93*

12.40*

12.85*

11.99

23.40* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 35 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861 Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia BROAD AND

BUTLER

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING 1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006 120

120

120

120

120

120

120

145 41.8

42.7

46.8

58.8

56.5

38.4

40.0

63.0 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

33.3

39.0

39.6

36.2

42.3

31.5

39.4

38.5 76

91

108

106

70

108

85

199 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

33.3

39.0

40.1

38.7

42.3

37.7

39.4

48.0 32.4

34.2

39.6

36.2

38.3

31.5

36.9

41.8 32.1

31.4

37.1

34.5

36.9

30.0

32.9

38.5 15.53*

17.14*

16.98

15.57*

16.13*

14.39*

15.06*

15.52* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 36 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0047

42-101-0052

42-101-0055

42-101-0057

42-101-0057

42-101-0057

42-101-0057

42-101-0136 1

1

4

4

1

1

1

1

4

4

1 0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861 Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

500 SOUTH

BROAD STREET

- PARKING

LOT(CHS

1439 EAST

PASSYUNK

AVENUE

24TH & RITNER

STREETS

240 Spring

Garden Street

240 Spring

Garden Street

240 Spring

Garden Street

240 Spring

Garden Street

AMTRAK, 5917

ELMWOOD 2007

2008

2007

2008

2002

2008

2007

2008

2007

2008

1999 145

145

145

145

120

145

145

145

145

145

120 45.8

41.9

44.5

40.7

50.5

43.8

35.5

43.9

27.8

42.0

38.5 Y 0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

35.2

32.8

38.4

33.4

36.6

34.5

33.1

32.8

27.8

32.6

34.4 303

356

172

347

79

331

108

350

4

342

103 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

40.0

38.7

39.7

39.5

36.6

41.4

34.0

40.1

17.7

39.0

34.8 39.7

37.6

38.4

38.8

31.2

40.4

33.1

36.7

14.3

36.8

34.4 37.5

36.9

38.4

35.6

30.6

38.0

28.3

34.6

10.0

36.2

32.2 14.37*

13.50

14.86*

13.21

13.14

13.49

12.04*

13.29

17.45*

12.93

14.54* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 37 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-101-0136

42-125-0005

42-125-0005 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0861

0851

0851 Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Charleroi

Charleroi Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Washington

Washington AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917

ELMWOOD

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917

ELMWOOD

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917

ELMWOOD

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917

ELMWOOD

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917

ELMWOOD

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917

ELMWOOD

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917

ELMWOOD

AVENUE

AMTRAK, 5917

ELMWOOD

AVENUE

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

1999

2000 000

000

120

120

120

000

145

145

118

118 49.2

52.9

57.3

56.1

45.0

35.2

44.6

38.5

35.5

36.5 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

39.0

46.0

37.0

35.6

29.5

31.2

37.7

31.7

33.2

36.0 282

334

329

296

347

237

249

294

73

111 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

48.9

52.1

57.2

49.0

36.1

34.3

41.7

37.5

33.2

36.0 44.6

50.4

46.3

44.9

33.6

31.9

38.5

33.8

33.1

36.0 41.7

49.2

44.0

37.4

33.2

31.6

38.2

33.5

28.7

35.4 14.81*

16.69

13.97

14.03*

12.73

14.23*

13.14*

13.33*

15.44*

15.27* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 38 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 45.0

89.2

54.1

54.7

51.6

35.5

48.2

45.1 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

44.4

45.4

35.6

35.4

36.4

31.6

40.9

27.2 115

118

118

116

117

119

114

114 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

44.5

48.2

40.7

38.1

37.6

33.2

45.0

29.0 44.4

45.4

35.6

35.4

36.4

31.6

40.9

27.2 41.8

43.3

33.0

33.0

35.0

30.9

40.1

24.5 15.90

15.88

14.89

13.99

16.36

14.42

15.51

13.03 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 39 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005

42-125-0005 2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi

Charleroi Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01

WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

CHARLER01 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 31.2

14.1

18.4

11.0

14.6

52.8

36.2

41.0

45.8 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

31.2

14.1

18.4

11.0

14.6

52.8

32.7

40.5

29.7 3

3

1

1

3

49

55

56

54 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

13.2

7.4

8.9

30.0

32.7

40.5

29.7 12.0

7.2

7.6

29.3

30.5

34.3

28.8 28.7

29.7

33.7

24.3 21.90*

9.03*

18.40*

11.00*

11.43*

16.70*

14.39

16.54

13.47 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 40 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-0200

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington WASTE

TREATMENT

PLANT

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

MCCARRELL AND

FAYETTE STS

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS

CREEK ROAD 1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 49.2

38.2

47.7

52.0

54.1

47.1

46.5

37.1

43.9

29.3

42.5

37.0

51.2 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

42.4

33.3

38.9

37.2

33.4

34.0

33.1

33.0

37.9

25.6

38.1

30.5

37.6 77

111

116

118

116

119

120

107

118

110

261

340

316 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

42.4

34.1

39.9

48.2

42.7

37.3

36.5

34.2

39.7

28.4

42.2

32.6

49.3 39.2

33.3

38.9

37.2

33.4

34.0

33.1

33.0

37.9

25.6

41.9

32.5

46.0 29.2

32.0

36.6

36.7

33.0

29.5

30.2

31.5

36.1

25.6

40.0

32.3

45.6 14.58*

15.16

15.85

14.49

14.74

14.14

15.88

13.08*

14.83

12.27

12.98*

13.20

14.43* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 41 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-125-5001

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Not in a city

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Washington

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS

CREEK ROAD

HILLMAN STATE

PARK - KINGS

CREEK ROAD

DONOHOE ROAD

- PENN DOT

MAINT DIST

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD

- PENN DOT

MAINT DIST

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD

- PENN DOT

MAINT DIST

BLDG 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001 118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

118

118 44.7

54.4

45.1

57.2

47.9

64.1

39.2

60.5

39.0

47.1 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

36.7

33.9

36.0

39.2

39.3

41.2

26.4

37.5

37.2

44.1 265

328

347

346

277

343

320

69

100

116 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

44.1

53.0

44.5

49.4

41.0

60.2

32.0

37.5

37.2

45.3 40.7

40.1

40.8

46.4

39.6

44.6

30.6

31.0

36.2

44.1 39.1

35.4

39.4

43.3

39.5

42.2

29.7

30.7

33.7

43.9 13.21*

13.40

13.21

14.23

11.94*

13.79

11.30*

14.90*

15.78*

16.11 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 42 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-129-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

Greensburg

York

York

York

York Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

Westmoreland

York

York

York

York DONOHOE ROAD

- PENN DOT

MAINT DIST

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD

- PENN DOT

MAINT DIST

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD

- PENN DOT

MAINT DIST

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD

- PENN DOT

MAINT DIST

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD

- PENN DOT

MAINT DIST

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD

- PENN DOT

MAINT DIST

BLDG

DONOHOE ROAD

- PENN DOT

MAINT DIST

BLDG

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST. 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

1999

2000

2001

2002 118

118

145

145

145

145

145

118

118

118

118 56.3

54.7

59.3

53.2

38.8

45.1

35.4

51.6

50.9

52.7

71.9 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

40.0

34.8

39.0

38.7

33.5

38.2

29.2

34.9

41.1

41.3

47.3 113

114

118

115

120

115

114

96

117

109

116 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

47.1

39.1

49.6

44.3

36.5

43.2

32.7

34.9

42.7

41.7

52.8 40.0

34.8

39.0

38.7

33.5

38.2

29.2

34.3

41.1

41.3

47.3 37.8

33.5

33.3

38.7

32.9

37.1

25.4

33.1

37.8

38.9

45.6 14.96

15.32

14.92

16.81

14.32

15.26

12.67

15.40*

16.55

16.62

17.09 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 43 of 45 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Pennsylvania Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008

42-133-0008 1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2 0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851

0851 York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York

York HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST.

HILL ST. 2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2000

2001

2002

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008 118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

118 71.5

56.7

58.4

37.9

45.4

37.0

28.3

40.0

12.6

16.5

55.8

35.1

34.3

33.3 Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

47.0

35.9

39.4

33.2

37.0

32.3

28.3

40.0

12.6

16.5

43.3

33.2

28.8

32.1 111

111

112

112

119

113

2

6

1

3

52

53

58

56 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

48.0

37.5

45.5

35.3

37.9

33.1

17.6

22.4

15.1

43.3

33.2

28.8

32.1 47.0

35.9

39.4

33.2

37.0

32.3

22.2

4.1

30.4

31.5

27.9

25.7 46.2

34.1

38.4

33.0

36.5

30.2

11.6

29.7

28.6

27.6

23.4 17.36

16.54

18.12

14.04

15.68

13.64

22.95*

18.18*

12.60*

9.95*

17.82*

14.48

14.96

13.06 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 44 of 45 88101

88101

88101

88101 000

118

120

145 MULTIPLE METHODS

R & P Model 2025 PM2.5 Sequential w/WINS
Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS
R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler MULTIPLE METHODS

GRAVIMETRIC

GRAVIMETRIC

Gravimetric PARAMETER METHOD

CODE COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD METHODS USED IN THIS REPORTOct. 15, 2009

Note: The * indicates that the mean does
not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 45 of 45 PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT

PQAO AGENCY DESCRIPTION

0021

0851

0861 Allegheny County,PA Health Department
Pennsylvania Department Of Environmental Protection
Philadelphia Air Management Services

# APPENDIX A-2

United States Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality System: PM2.5 Qu arterly Data (1999 – 2008) (provided in electronic form only)

Bureau of Air Quality Department of Environmental Protection

## This page blank for copying purposes.1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)001 0001 NARSTO SITE -ARENDTSVILLE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.89000 60 67 N2 0 12.07949 78 86 Y3 0 17.53793 58 63 N4 0 10.98056 72 78 Y003 0008 BAPC 301 39THSTREET BLDG#70021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.08182 11 100 Y2 0 22.63333 3 13 N3 0 17.47000 20 73 N4 0 13.74146 41 45 N0021 GLADSTONEHIGH SCHOOL0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.83000 10 33 N2 0 18.32000 25 83 Y3 0 19.26364 22 68 N4 0 15.88400 25 77 Y0064 2743Washington Blvd0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 16.49250 40 59 N2 0 18.71132 53 58 N3 0 20.34200 50 54 N4 0 19.64681 47 51 N0067 OLD OAKDALEROAD, SOUTHFAYETTE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 2 0 14.65238 21 78 Y3 0 17.57308 26 84 Y4 0 12.72500 24 77 Y0093 PEARCE MILLROAD NORTHPARK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 5.20000 1 50 N2 0 10.95000 6 33 N3 0 17.72000 5 33 N4 0 14.08000 5 33 N1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)00951000 BEAVERGRADE RDCORAOPOLISPA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.11667 6 55N2 0 16.62500 8 53N3 0 21.27000 10 67N4 0 10.50000 3 20N0097BEAVER ROADLEETSDALE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 26.96667 3 20N3 0 21.90000 5 33N4 0 14.73000 10 67N0116405 WHEELERAVE, MCKEESROCKS, PA151320021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.51765 17 57N2 0 18.07778 18 57N3 0 20.04167 24 77Y4 0 15.33200 25 83Y0131WAVEPOOL,SOUTHPARK, SOUTHPARK TWP, PA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 8.98000 5 30N2 0 18.59091 11 73N3 0 29.03333 6 40N4 0 15.13333 3 20N1008PACIFIC &IDAHO AVE,NATRONA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.12143 14 81Y2 0 18.16923 26 87Y3 0 22.98750 16 52N4 0 16.52800 25 77Y1301600 ANDERSONST, N.BRADDOCK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 15.88333 6 24N2 0 15.71250 24 80Y3 0 21.22609 23 74N4 0 17.95000 26 83Y1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)9002SPRINGDALEJR HIGH,COLFAX &BUTLER0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.79091 11 73N2 0 17.06923 13 87Y3 0 23.71000 10 67N4 0 13.35556 9 60N0110009UGI COMONGANTOWNRD ANDPROSPECT ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.36923 13 43N2 0 12.44583 24 80Y3 0 16.02143 28 90Y4 0 14.21538 26 87Y0170012ROCKVIEWLANE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 8.42308 13 43N2 0 12.61765 17 57N3 0 13.45882 17 55N4 0 13.50000 20 67N0210011MILLER AUTOSHOP 1MESSENGERST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.47333 15 50N2 0 16.95909 22 73N3 0 18.02857 21 68N4 0 12.65000 22 73N04304011833 UPSDRIVEHARRISBURGPA0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.53390 59 66N2 0 13.39870 77 85Y3 0 17.57051 78 85Y4 0 13.04667 30 33N1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0450002FRONT ST &NORRIS ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 9.98667 15 50N2 0 12.35600 25 83Y3 0 16.30000 27 87Y4 0 13.84815 27 90Y049000310TH ANDMARNESTREETS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.37778 9 30N2 0 12.05000 10 33N3 0 15.40000 3 10N4 0 10.66250 16 53N0692006GEORGE STTROOP ANDCITY OFSCRANTON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 8.53143 35 39N2 0 10.47887 71 78Y3 0 14.62346 81 88Y4 0 10.36667 72 78Y0710007ABRAHAMLINCOLN JRHIGHGROFFTOWNRD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.54667 15 50N2 0 14.42857 28 93Y3 0 16.20455 22 71N4 0 16.37917 24 80Y0770004STATEHOSPITALREAR 1600HANOVER AVE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 8.37778 18 20N2 0 11.89747 79 87Y3 0 14.63182 22 24N4 0 12.66667 66 72N1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0791101CHILWICK &WASHINGTONSTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.37111 45 50N2 0 11.59531 64 70N3 0 16.23117 77 84Y4 0 11.97121 66 72N0910013STATEARMORY - 1046BELVOIR RD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.92667 15 50N2 0 13.21111 18 60N3 0 15.82500 20 65N4 0 12.11200 25 83Y0950025WASHINGTON& CAMBRIASTS.FREEMANSBURG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.98889 18 20N2 0 11.76420 81 89Y3 0 15.23871 31 34N4 0 13.41200 50 54N10100041501 ELYCOMING AVEAMS LAB0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.63714 35 39N2 0 13.51154 52 57N3 0 16.22895 76 83Y4 0 15.19000 70 76Y0020FORD RDBELMONT AVEWATER TREATPLANT0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.76667 6 13N2 0 10.98947 19 60N3 0 15.45000 28 90Y4 0 13.99286 28 93Y0024GRANTASHTONROADS PHILANE AIRPORT0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.02000 5 17N2 0 14.40000 6 20N1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)3 0 12.98400 25 81Y4 0 12.40357 28 93Y0047500 SOUTHBROAD STREET- PARKINGLOT(CHS0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 14.16000 10 33N2 0 14.81538 13 43N3 0 16.24444 27 87Y4 0 16.91154 26 87Y0136AMTRAK, 5917ELMWOODAVENUE0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 14.37000 30 33N2 0 12.36842 38 42N3 0 15.14074 27 29N4 0 16.26250 89N1250005CHARLER01WASTETREATMENTPLANT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.64500 20 67N2 0 17.07619 21 70N3 0 17.93684 19 61N4 0 14.11538 13 43N0200MCCARRELLAND FAYETTESTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.01579 19 63N2 0 15.25882 17 57N3 0 18.60000 26 84Y4 0 13.45333 15 50N5001HILLMANSTATE PARK -KINGS CREEKROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 9.57750 40 44N2 0 14.31528 72 79Y3 0 16.49342 76 83Y4 0 11.51781 73 79Y1999 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):1999 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)1290008DONOHOEROAD - PENNDOT MAINTDIST BLDG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.15000 12 40N2 0 15.83500 20 67N3 0 18.78846 26 84Y4 0 12.81818 11 37N1330008HILL ST.0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.69524 21 70N2 0 14.89286 28 93Y3 0 15.98182 22 71N4 0 15.04000 25 83Y2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)001 0001 NARSTO SITE -ARENDTSVILLE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.49744 78 86 Y2 0 13.78101 79 87 Y3 0 13.81493 67 73 N4 0 11.97241 87 95 Y003 0008 BAPC 301 39THSTREET BLDG#70021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.41250 72 79 Y2 0 14.50909 22 24 N3 0 16.83333 84 91 Y4 0 16.78312 77 84 Y0021 GLADSTONEHIGH SCHOOL0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.41923 26 77 Y2 0 15.97500 24 73 N3 0 15.88929 28 87 Y4 0 14.11429 21 63 N0064 2743Washington Blvd0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 20.27841 88 97 Y2 0 21.86479 71 78 Y3 0 20.83837 86 93 Y4 0 20.68072 83 90 Y0067 OLD OAKDALEROAD, SOUTHFAYETTE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.48947 19 55 N2 0 14.93913 23 70 N3 0 14.39643 28 84 Y4 0 15.53846 13 43 N0093 PEARCE MILLROAD NORTHPARK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.32500 12 75 Y2 0 17.25000 10 67 N3 0 14.12308 13 87 Y2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)4 0 13.25000 8 53N00951000 BEAVERGRADE RDCORAOPOLISPA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.82222 9 56N2 0 14.82500 12 73N3 0 11.18750 8 53N4 0 14.67143 7 47N0097BEAVER ROADLEETSDALE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.95000 12 75Y2 0 17.17000 10 67N3 0 14.82500 8 53N4 0 13.92500 8 53N0116405 WHEELERAVE, MCKEESROCKS, PA151320021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.24615 26 81Y2 0 16.94167 24 73N3 0 17.35000 20 55N4 0 14.02083 24 77Y0131WAVEPOOL,SOUTHPARK, SOUTHPARK TWP, PA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.20000 15 94Y2 0 16.25000 10 67N3 0 14.68571 14 93Y4 0 15.78889 9 60N1008PACIFIC &IDAHO AVE,NATRONA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 15.22000 25 77Y2 0 17.10952 21 67N3 0 16.35161 31 90Y4 0 15.69600 25 73N1301600 ANDERSONST, N.BRADDOCK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 15.98400 25 77Y2 0 14.71333 15 47N3 0 17.61852 27 84Y2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)4 0 17.47619 21 67N9002SPRINGDALEJR HIGH,COLFAX &BUTLER0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.90833 12 75Y2 0 14.09231 13 80Y3 0 13.73571 14 93Y4 0 17.30000 12 80Y0070014EIGHT STREETAND RIVERALLEY0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.01600 25 81Y2 0 15.78621 29 97Y3 0 16.18125 16 52N4 0 17.58966 29 97Y2 7 1 0 16.23333 3 19N3 0 6.83333 3 20N0110009UGI COMONGANTOWNRD ANDPROSPECT ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 18.59643 28 90Y2 0 15.58889 27 90Y3 0 15.16000 30 97Y4 0 18.12500 28 93Y0170012ROCKVIEWLANE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.41429 21 68N2 0 13.17241 29 97Y3 0 12.70000 25 74N4 0 16.26000 25 83Y0210011MILLER AUTOSHOP 1MESSENGERST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.30000 17 55N2 0 17.16667 27 90Y3 0 15.82903 31 100 Y4 0 15.07692 26 87Y2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0270100PENN STATEUNIVERSITY -ARBORETUMSITE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.72667 15 75Y2 0 12.86923 26 83Y3 0 11.70000 10 29N4 0 10.53158 19 63N0410100210 NORTHMIDDLESEXROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.35952 42 70N2 0 14.55747 87 96Y3 0 14.01798 89 97Y4 0 14.94225 71 77Y04304011833 UPSDRIVEHARRISBURGPA0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 18.24462 65 71N2 0 13.43704 54 59N3 0 15.33288 73 79Y4 0 15.74396 91 99Y0450002FRONT ST &NORRIS ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.36667 27 87Y2 0 17.49643 28 93Y3 0 15.49667 30 97Y4 0 15.60741 27 90Y2 7 1 0 8.20000 16N2 0 20.40000 2 13N3 0 19.70000 17N4 0 4.70000 2 13N049000310TH ANDMARNESTREETS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.68750 16 52N2 0 14.41667 12 33N2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)3 0 12.92500 12 39N4 0 13.93684 19 63N0692006GEORGE STTROOP ANDCITY OFSCRANTON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.88837 86 95Y2 0 11.89259 81 89Y3 0 13.35000 86 93Y4 0 10.56222 90 98Y2 7 2 0 15.00000 3 20N3 0 10.40000 17N0710007ABRAHAMLINCOLN JRHIGHGROFFTOWNRD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 19.64815 27 87Y2 0 16.52857 21 70N3 0 16.47500 28 90Y4 0 20.21364 22 73N2 7 1 0 19.80000 2 13N2 0 14.33333 3 20N3 0 15.40000 17N4 0 12.52500 4 27N0770004STATEHOSPITALREAR 1600HANOVER AVE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.48590 78 86Y2 0 14.11757 74 81Y3 0 13.94824 85 92Y4 0 13.49176 85 92Y0791101CHILWICK &WASHINGTONSTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.18736 87 96Y2 0 12.40824 85 93Y3 0 14.52381 84 91Y4 0 11.48090 89 97Y2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0850100PA518 (NEWCASTLE ROAD)& PA4180851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 2 0 17.77500 12 40N3 0 12.43750 16 52N4 0 13.94000 25 77Y0910013STATEARMORY - 1046BELVOIR RD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.11818 22 71N2 0 13.88077 26 87Y3 0 12.68929 28 90Y4 0 14.20333 30 100 Y0950025WASHINGTON& CAMBRIASTS.FREEMANSBURG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.05714 63 69N2 0 13.07083 72 79Y3 0 13.50471 85 92Y4 0 13.14103 78 85Y0990301ROUTE 34LITTLEBUFFALOSTATE PARK0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.49200 25 81Y2 0 12.68621 29 97Y3 0 12.24643 28 90Y4 0 11.91786 28 93Y10100041501 ELYCOMING AVEAMS LAB0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 17.22656 64 70N2 0 13.16042 48 53N3 0 14.20230 87 95Y4 0 15.11744 86 93Y0020FORD RDBELMONT AVEWATER TREATPLANT0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.62593 27 87Y2 0 15.89000 10 33N2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)3 0 13.91724 29 94Y4 0 15.42000 25 83Y0024GRANTASHTONROADS PHILANE AIRPORT0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.81481 27 87Y2 0 16.82500 12 40N3 0 13.42258 31 100 Y4 0 15.56000 25 83Y0027S W CORNERBROAD ANDBUTLER0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 2 0 21.66667 15 50N3 0 19.42903 31 100 Y4 0 29.10000 1 25N0047500 SOUTHBROAD STREET- PARKINGLOT(CHS0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 16.27778 27 87Y2 0 18.97143 7 23N3 0 15.44333 30 97Y4 0 17.87778 27 90Y0136AMTRAK, 5917ELMWOODAVENUE0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 16.88167 60 66N2 0 12.98431 51 56N3 0 14.95349 86 93Y4 0 14.40588 85 92Y1250005CHARLER01WASTETREATMENTPLANT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.85217 23 74N2 0 16.49000 30 100 Y3 0 16.12414 29 94Y4 0 15.62069 29 97Y2 7 1 0 12.60000 2 13N3 0 31.20000 17N2000 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2000 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0200MCCARRELLAND FAYETTESTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.23333 24 77Y2 0 15.91379 29 97Y3 0 16.50000 31 100 Y4 0 15.97407 27 90Y5001HILLMANSTATE PARK -KINGS CREEKROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.32386 88 97Y2 0 14.32824 85 93Y3 0 14.77059 85 92Y4 0 13.35854 82 89Y1290008DONOHOEROAD - PENNDOT MAINTDIST BLDG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.65769 26 81Y2 0 16.63214 28 93Y3 0 15.99130 23 74N4 0 16.85652 23 77Y1330008HILL ST.0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 17.31034 29 94Y2 0 15.95714 28 93Y3 0 15.75484 31 100 Y4 0 17.17931 29 97Y2 7 1 0 17.60000 16N2 0 28.30000 17N2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)001 0001 NARSTO SITE -ARENDTSVILLE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.77079 89 99 Y2 0 16.23103 87 96 Y3 0 16.54186 86 93 Y4 0 10.68391 87 95 Y003 0008 BAPC 301 39THSTREET BLDG#70021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 15.43953 86 96 Y2 0 17.40330 91 100 Y3 0 20.17865 89 97 Y4 0 13.28533 75 82 Y0021 GLADSTONEHIGH SCHOOL0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.27333 30 90 Y2 0 17.98276 29 87 Y3 0 17.00400 25 73 N4 0 13.97083 24 68 N0064 2743Washington Blvd0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 19.44824 85 94 Y2 0 25.60000 90 99 Y3 0 25.62111 90 98 Y4 0 21.53889 72 78 Y0067 OLD OAKDALEROAD, SOUTHFAYETTE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.88462 26 77 Y2 0 15.08333 24 74 N3 0 16.38667 30 90 Y4 0 12.78889 18 55 N0093 PEARCE MILLROAD NORTHPARK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.59091 11 73 N2 0 14.05625 16 100 Y3 0 16.85000 14 93 Y2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)4 0 13.97143 7 47N00951000 BEAVERGRADE RDCORAOPOLISPA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.37500 12 80Y2 0 17.85000 10 63N3 0 16.93846 13 87Y4 0 13.15000 10 60N0116405 WHEELERAVE, MCKEESROCKS, PA151320021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.67857 28 87Y2 0 17.47143 28 87Y3 0 18.19259 27 80Y4 0 12.01667 24 68N0131WAVEPOOL,SOUTHPARK, SOUTHPARK TWP, PA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.77143 14 93Y2 0 15.29333 15 94Y3 0 18.73000 10 67N4 0 12.59091 11 73N1008PACIFIC &IDAHO AVE,NATRONA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.48929 28 87Y2 0 18.03846 26 74N3 0 18.32917 24 73N4 0 13.56667 21 61N1301600 ANDERSONST, N.BRADDOCK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 15.70400 25 73N2 0 19.45000 30 90Y3 0 17.47857 28 83Y4 0 15.73077 26 71N3007501 Waddell Ave 0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.53077 13 87Y2 0 21.77333 15 94Y3 0 20.58000 15 100 Y2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)4 0 17.73333 12 73N9002SPRINGDALEJR HIGH,COLFAX &BUTLER0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.20667 15 93Y2 0 12.74286 14 88Y3 0 17.70000 12 80Y4 0 14.70000 10 67N0070014EIGHT STREETAND RIVERALLEY0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.49286 28 93Y2 0 16.91071 28 90Y3 0 21.81429 21 70N4 0 14.54800 25 81Y2 7 1 0 19.20000 2 13N2 0 20.65000 2 13N3 0 9.50000 3 20N4 0 15.66667 3 20N0110009UGI COMONGANTOWNRD ANDPROSPECT ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 19.49000 30 100 Y2 0 16.53226 31 100 Y3 0 16.18214 28 93Y4 0 13.76452 31 100 Y0170012ROCKVIEWLANE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.90000 29 97Y2 0 15.07419 31 100 Y3 0 13.79615 26 87Y4 0 13.12903 31 100 Y2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0210011MILLER AUTOSHOP 1MESSENGERST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.99630 27 90Y2 0 16.92903 31 100 Y3 0 18.25833 24 80Y4 0 13.21000 30 97Y0270100PENN STATEUNIVERSITY -ARBORETUMSITE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.59873 79 88Y2 0 13.54737 76 84Y3 0 15.62286 70 76Y4 0 11.09651 86 93Y0410100210 NORTHMIDDLESEXROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 17.55465 86 99Y0101IMPERIALCOURT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.10000 3 100 Y2 0 16.83750 88 97Y3 0 15.86145 83 90Y4 0 12.40000 86 93Y04304011833 UPSDRIVEHARRISBURGPA0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 18.09545 88 98Y2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)2 0 16.89659 88 97Y3 0 17.12874 87 95Y4 0 13.86207 87 95Y0450002FRONT ST &NORRIS ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 17.40000 30 100 Y2 0 17.63000 30 97Y3 0 16.08214 28 93Y4 0 12.31667 30 97Y2 7 3 0 20.00000 17N4 0 7.60000 17N049000310TH ANDMARNESTREETS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.34384 73 81Y2 0 15.18375 80 88Y3 0 14.06744 43 47N4 0 10.73529 68 74N0692006GEORGE STTROOP ANDCITY OFSCRANTON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.17841 88 98Y2 0 13.11023 88 97Y3 0 14.01463 82 89Y4 0 10.60759 79 86Y2 7 2 0 6.00000 16N3 0 16.40000 17N4 0 12.95000 2 13N2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0710007ABRAHAMLINCOLN JRHIGHGROFFTOWNRD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 21.74138 29 97Y2 0 17.63667 30 97Y3 0 14.80741 27 90Y4 0 14.26429 28 90Y2 7 1 0 9.60000 17N3 0 26.95000 2 13N4 0 15.70000 2 13N0770004STATEHOSPITALREAR 1600HANOVER AVE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 16.91910 89 99Y2 0 14.89770 87 96Y3 0 16.39481 77 84Y4 0 12.19063 64 70N0791101CHILWICK &WASHINGTONSTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.08023 86 96Y2 0 13.68864 88 97Y3 0 14.97619 84 91Y4 0 12.10899 89 97Y0850100PA518 (NEWCASTLE ROAD)& PA4180851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.85128 78 87Y2 0 15.55402 87 96Y3 0 17.69875 80 87Y4 0 12.16923 65 71N2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0910013STATEARMORY - 1046BELVOIR RD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.82333 30 100 Y2 0 14.95806 31 100 Y3 0 16.74231 26 87Y4 0 11.98214 28 90Y0950025WASHINGTON& CAMBRIASTS.FREEMANSBURG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 17.24648 71 79Y2 0 14.53820 89 98Y3 0 15.69600 75 82Y4 0 13.82317 82 89Y0990301ROUTE 34LITTLEBUFFALOSTATE PARK0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.39310 29 97Y2 0 13.47241 29 94Y3 0 13.98966 29 97Y4 0 10.42759 29 90Y10100041501 ELYCOMING AVEAMS LAB0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 18.66029 68 76Y2 0 16.00361 83 91Y3 0 16.14000 90 98Y4 0 15.07738 84 91Y0020FORD RDBELMONT AVEWATER TREATPLANT0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 17.14762 21 70N2 0 15.52414 29 94Y3 0 16.36429 28 93Y2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)4 0 12.53462 26 84Y0024GRANTASHTONROADS PHILANE AIRPORT0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 16.42667 30 100 Y2 0 14.48214 28 90Y3 0 15.30690 29 97Y4 0 12.27097 31 100 Y0047500 SOUTHBROAD STREET- PARKINGLOT(CHS0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 19.69200 25 83Y2 0 17.33333 27 87Y3 0 16.25000 26 87Y4 0 14.66333 30 97Y0136AMTRAK, 5917ELMWOODAVENUE0861 PhiladelphiaAirManagementServices1 7 1 0 19.05844 77 86Y2 0 16.80617 81 89Y3 0 16.25165 91 99Y4 0 14.62471 85 92Y1250005CHARLER01WASTETREATMENTPLANT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.11429 28 93Y2 0 17.21935 31 100 Y3 0 19.87692 26 87Y4 0 12.38333 30 97Y2 7 1 0 10.65000 2 13N4 0 7.40000 17N0200MCCARRELLAND FAYETTESTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.68966 29 97Y2 0 16.92258 31 100 Y2001 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2001 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)3 0 20.01154 26 87Y4 0 11.76667 30 97Y5001HILLMANSTATE PARK -KINGS CREEKROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.01124 89 99Y2 0 15.46941 85 93Y3 0 19.20000 76 83Y4 0 11.02727 66 72N1290008DONOHOEROAD - PENNDOT MAINTDIST BLDG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.29667 30 100 Y2 0 17.33103 29 94Y3 0 19.16897 29 97Y4 0 12.64643 28 90Y1330008HILL ST.0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 18.64667 30 100 Y2 0 18.24800 25 81Y3 0 16.32000 25 83Y4 0 13.25862 29 94Y2 7 2 0 17.00000 2 13N3 0 19.35000 4 27N2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)001 0001 NARSTO SITE -ARENDTSVILLE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.17297 74 82 Y2 0 12.68721 86 95 Y3 5 17.15663 83 93 Y4 0 10.51461 89 97 Y003 0008 BAPC 301 39THSTREET BLDG#70021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.36941 85 94 Y2 0 16.10602 83 91 Y3 0 19.82159 88 96 Y4 0 13.01209 91 99 Y0021 GLADSTONEHIGH SCHOOL0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.46333 30 87 Y2 0 15.93448 29 87 Y3 0 18.57407 27 81 Y4 0 12.21724 29 90 Y0064 2743Washington Blvd0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 18.14070 86 96 Y2 0 22.05055 91 100 Y3 0 25.16593 91 99 Y4 0 15.82529 87 95 Y0067 OLD OAKDALEROAD, SOUTHFAYETTE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 9.21429 28 83 Y2 0 12.12174 23 70 N3 0 17.48889 27 81 Y4 0 10.41111 27 84 Y0093 PEARCE MILLROAD NORTHPARK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.57857 14 93 Y2 0 14.51538 13 87 Y3 0 20.13571 14 81 Y4 0 9.29333 15 100 Y2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)00951000 BEAVERGRADE RDCORAOPOLISPA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.33571 14 93Y2 0 15.56364 11 73N3 0 17.66250 16 100 Y4 0 10.94286 14 93Y0116 405 WHEELERAVE, MCKEESROCKS, PA151320021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.31667 30 87 Y2 0 14.23333 24 77 Y3 0 18.08519 27 84 Y4 0 13.14615 26 81 Y0131 WAVEPOOL,SOUTHPARK, SOUTHPARK TWP, PA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.10714 14 93 Y2 0 14.86923 13 87 Y3 0 18.40000 12 75 Y4 0 10.65000 12 80 Y1008 PACIFIC &IDAHO AVE,NATRONA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.57419 31 90 Y2 0 18.04286 28 83 Y3 0 20.05333 30 90 Y4 0 12.68710 31 97 Y1301 600 ANDERSONST, N.BRADDOCK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 15.14667 30 87 Y2 0 16.28889 27 83 Y3 0 21.90714 28 84 Y4 0 14.33793 29 90 Y3007 501 Waddell Ave 0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.55000 14 93 Y2 0 15.17333 15 100 Y3 0 21.88462 13 81 Y4 0 14.39286 14 93 Y2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)9002SPRINGDALEJR HIGH,COLFAX &BUTLER0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.07143 14 93Y2 0 15.26364 11 73N3 0 18.62500 16 100 Y4 0 10.72857 14 93Y0070014EIGHT STREETAND RIVERALLEY0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.83571 28 93 Y2 0 13.50690 29 97 Y3 0 20.87742 31 100 Y4 0 12.80645 31 100 Y2 7 1 0 9.90000 1 7 N011 0009 UGI COMONGANTOWNRD ANDPROSPECT ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.19333 30 100 Y2 0 15.76111 18 60 N3 0 19.05172 29 94 Y4 0 16.61935 31 100 Y017 0012 ROCKVIEWLANE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.68462 26 87 Y2 0 12.23448 29 97 Y3 5 15.83929 28 94 Y4 0 14.83704 27 87 Y021 0011 MILLER AUTOSHOP 1MESSENGERST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.95357 28 93 Y2 0 15.95000 30 100 Y3 0 21.63548 31 100 Y4 0 13.83871 31 100 Y027 0100 PENN STATEUNIVERSITY -ARBORETUMSITE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.41212 66 73 N2 0 13.41818 77 85 Y3 0 13.58148 54 59 N2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)4 0 9.71905 63 68N0290100NEW GARDENAIRPORT -TOUGHKENAMON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.63077 26 87Y2 0 13.19231 26 87Y3 0 17.02593 27 87Y4 0 14.60323 31 100 Y0410101IMPERIALCOURT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.56404 89 99Y2 0 15.23333 78 86Y3 5 17.21685 89 100 Y4 0 12.39659 88 96Y04304011833 UPSDRIVEHARRISBURGPA0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.77674 86 96Y2 0 13.95169 89 98Y3 5 18.33256 86 97Y4 0 12.95402 87 95Y0450002FRONT ST &NORRIS ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.32069 29 97Y2 0 14.24643 28 93Y3 5 16.20714 28 94Y4 0 15.14667 30 97Y2 7 2 0 11.60000 17N3 0 11.60000 16N049000310TH ANDMARNESTREETS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.83429 70 78Y2 0 13.04839 62 68N3 0 17.45854 82 89Y4 0 10.47882 85 92Y0692006GEORGE STTROOP ANDCITY OFSCRANTON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.46667 90 100 Y2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)2 0 12.63000 90 99Y3 5 15.85595 84 96Y4 0 9.83000 80 87Y0710007ABRAHAMLINCOLN JRHIGHGROFFTOWNRD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.95862 29 97Y2 0 15.43103 29 97Y3 0 18.94643 28 90Y4 0 15.27241 29 94Y2 7 2 0 15.90000 17N0770004STATEHOSPITALREAR 1600HANOVER AVE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.68537 82 91Y2 0 11.41500 60 66N3 5 15.81724 87 99Y4 0 12.67865 89 97Y0791101CHILWICK &WASHINGTONSTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.28072 83 92Y2 0 11.69189 74 81Y3 5 14.03878 49 55N4 0 9.95862 87 95Y0850100PA518 (NEWCASTLE ROAD)& PA4180851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.68765 81 90Y2 0 11.85067 75 82Y3 0 18.59419 86 93Y4 0 12.93647 85 92Y0910013STATEARMORY - 1046BELVOIR RD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.61000 30 100 Y2 0 12.85185 27 90Y3 5 15.20667 30 100 Y4 0 13.73548 31 100 Y2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0950025WASHINGTON& CAMBRIASTS.FREEMANSBURG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.57143 84 93Y2 0 12.10345 87 96Y3 5 17.58947 76 87Y4 0 13.12759 87 95Y0990301ROUTE 34LITTLEBUFFALOSTATE PARK0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.00690 29 97Y2 0 13.11111 27 90Y3 0 18.28621 29 94Y4 0 11.46000 30 97Y10100041501 ELYCOMING AVEAMS LAB0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 14.16625 80 89Y2 0 12.76190 84 92Y3 5 17.11154 78 87Y4 0 13.46629 89 97Y0014ROXY WATERPUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 4 0 14.53750 16 100 Y0020FORD RDBELMONT AVEWATER TREATPLANT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.62222 27 90Y2 0 13.39333 30 100 Y3 5 15.24643 28 94Y4 0 13.76774 31 100 Y0024GRANTASHTONROADS PHILANE AIRPORT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.66897 29 97Y2 0 12.69000 30 100 Y3 5 14.85714 28 94Y4 0 14.42692 26 84Y2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0047500 SOUTHBROAD STREET- PARKINGLOT(CHS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 15.45385 26 87Y2 0 15.13182 22 73N3 5 15.80714 28 94Y4 0 15.90333 30 97 Y0052 1439 EASTPASSYUNKAVENUE0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.40000 9 90 Y2 0 13.58333 30 100 Y3 5 14.29000 30 100 Y4 0 11.27000 10 100 Y0136 AMTRAK, 5917ELMWOODAVENUE0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.76133 75 83 Y2 0 13.56548 84 92 Y3 5 15.85233 86 96 Y4 0 12.68690 84 91 Y125 0005 CHARLER01WASTETREATMENTPLANT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.64000 30 100 Y2 0 18.51667 30 100 Y3 0 21.66071 28 90 Y4 0 11.69667 30 97 Y2 7 2 0 18.40000 1 7 N0200 MCCARRELLAND FAYETTESTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.40345 29 97 Y2 0 14.47857 28 93 Y3 0 20.69677 31 100 Y4 0 12.36667 30 97 Y5001 HILLMANSTATE PARK -KINGS CREEKROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 9.91867 75 83 Y2 0 14.46481 54 59 N2002 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2002 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)3 0 17.78793 58 63N4 0 10.68590 78 85Y1290008DONOHOEROAD - PENNDOT MAINTDIST BLDG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.00400 25 80Y2 0 14.84444 27 90Y3 0 20.80000 30 97Y4 0 12.20968 31 100 Y1330008HILL ST.0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.93929 28 87Y2 0 16.67778 27 90Y3 0 19.55667 30 97Y4 0 18.19355 31 100 Y2 7 2 0 12.60000 17N2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)001 0001 NARSTO SITE -ARENDTSVILLE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.64079 76 84 Y2 0 13.59659 88 97 Y3 0 16.25000 76 83 Y4 0 10.75556 90 98 Y003 0008 BAPC 301 39THSTREET BLDG#70021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.31548 84 93 Y2 0 14.43444 90 99 Y3 0 18.71023 88 96 Y4 0 13.35778 90 98 Y0021 GLADSTONEHIGH SCHOOL0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.67826 23 77 Y2 0 13.78276 29 97 Y3 0 18.97692 26 81 Y4 0 10.81667 30 90 Y0064 2743Washington Blvd0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 17.11163 86 96 Y2 0 19.47033 91 100 Y3 0 22.97667 90 98 Y4 0 21.26630 92 100 Y0067 OLD OAKDALEROAD, SOUTHFAYETTE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.43077 26 87 Y2 0 12.64286 28 93 Y3 0 18.84211 19 61 N4 0 9.02308 26 83 Y0093 PEARCE MILLROAD NORTHPARK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.44167 12 80 Y2 0 15.56429 14 93 Y3 0 17.79000 10 63 N4 0 10.05000 14 93 Y2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)00951000 BEAVERGRADE RDCORAOPOLISPA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 15.80833 12 80 Y2 0 15.31667 12 80 Y3 0 21.26000 15 94 Y4 0 10.45714 14 93 Y0116405 WHEELERAVE, MCKEESROCKS, PA151320021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 15.20769 26 87 Y2 0 14.65926 27 90 Y3 0 20.40357 28 87 Y4 0 10.84074 27 80 Y0131WAVEPOOL,SOUTHPARK, SOUTHPARK TWP, PA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 9.98333 6 86 Y01335118 DORRISDRIVE,ELIZABETH0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.54000 5 83 Y2 0 15.72667 15 100 Y3 0 20.67143 14 88 Y4 0 9.83333 15 100 Y1008PACIFIC &IDAHO AVE,NATRONA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.92800 25 83 Y2 0 14.37778 27 90 Y3 0 20.96207 29 87 Y4 0 11.74667 30 90 Y1301600 ANDERSONST, N.BRADDOCK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 15.31500 20 67 N2 0 15.88571 28 93 Y3 0 22.12333 30 90 Y4 0 13.86154 26 80 Y3007501 Waddell Ave 0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 17.02667 15 100 Y2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)2 0 17.55714 14 93 Y3 0 21.30625 16 100 Y4 0 12.19333 15 100 Y9002 SPRINGDALEJR HIGH,COLFAX &BUTLER0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 15.06923 13 87 Y2 0 17.03077 13 87 Y3 0 20.34375 16 100 Y4 0 11.37333 15 100 Y007 0014 EIGHT STREETAND RIVERALLEY0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.01000 30 100 Y2 0 14.43077 26 87 Y3 0 19.71379 29 94 Y4 0 13.54000 30 100 Y2 7 2 0 24.20000 1 7 N3 0 9.00000 1 6 N011 0009 UGI COMONGANTOWNRD ANDPROSPECT ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 17.89655 29 97 Y2 0 15.64667 30 100 Y3 0 17.09667 30 97 Y4 0 13.93000 30 100 Y017 0012 ROCKVIEWLANE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.79667 30 100 Y2 0 14.27600 25 83 Y3 0 15.46552 29 94 Y4 0 13.12759 29 97 Y021 0011 MILLER AUTOSHOP 1MESSENGERST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.89000 30 100 Y2 0 14.60000 29 97 Y2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)3 0 21.00000 27 87 Y4 0 12.36000 30 100 Y027 0100 PENN STATEUNIVERSITY -ARBORETUMSITE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.47176 85 94 Y2 0 12.69506 81 89 Y3 0 16.03372 86 93 Y4 0 11.02174 92 100 Y029 0100 NEW GARDENAIRPORT -TOUGHKENAMON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 16.97667 30 100 Y2 0 15.41333 30 100 Y3 0 16.47500 28 90 Y4 0 13.41333 30 100 Y041 0101 IMPERIALCOURT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 16.19773 88 98 Y2 0 14.52000 80 88 Y3 0 16.92247 89 97 Y4 0 13.61087 92 100 Y043 0401 1833 UPSDRIVEHARRISBURGPA0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 17.30685 73 81 Y2 0 14.94157 89 98 Y3 0 17.57386 88 96 Y4 0 14.90349 86 93 Y045 0002 FRONT ST &NORRIS ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.57931 29 97 Y2 0 15.43704 27 90 Y3 0 17.14828 29 94 Y4 0 12.98667 30 100 Y2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)2 7 1 0 34.50000 17 N2 0 36.10000 17 N3 0 12.61667 6 38 N4 0 11.62000 5 33 N049000310TH ANDMARNESTREETS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.04713 87 97 Y2 0 12.34310 58 64 N3 0 14.92597 77 84 Y4 0 9.90465 43 47 N0692006GEORGE STTROOP ANDCITY OFSCRANTON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.21444 90 100 Y2 0 11.76444 90 99 Y3 0 15.28953 86 93 Y4 0 10.57237 76 83 Y2 7 2 0 5.50000 17 N3 0 8.20000 16 N4 0 5.70000 17 N0710007ABRAHAMLINCOLN JRHIGHGROFFTOWNRD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 20.71034 29 97 Y2 0 16.47667 30 100 Y3 0 17.62667 30 97 Y4 0 15.68000 30 100 Y2 7 2 0 25.20000 17 N3 0 9.50000 16 N0770004STATEHOSPITALREAR 1600HANOVER AVE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.57105 76 84 Y2 0 14.85303 66 73 N3 0 16.30000 83 90 Y4 0 13.34268 82 89 Y2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)0791101CHILWICK &WASHINGTONSTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.95333 90 100 Y2 0 12.38636 88 97 Y3 0 15.64000 90 98 Y4 0 11.24268 82 89 Y0850100PA518 (NEWCASTLE ROAD)& PA4180851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.21839 87 97 Y2 0 12.92346 81 89 Y3 0 16.16026 78 85 Y4 0 11.77647 85 92 Y0910013STATEARMORY - 1046BELVOIR RD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.48966 29 97 Y2 0 13.60435 23 77 Y3 0 15.58333 30 97 Y4 0 11.74828 29 97 Y0950025WASHINGTON& CAMBRIASTS.FREEMANSBURG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.91548 84 93 Y2 0 13.37889 90 99 Y3 0 15.25730 89 97 Y4 0 12.70227 88 96 Y0990301ROUTE 34LITTLEBUFFALOSTATE PARK0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.64000 30 100 Y2 0 14.54286 28 93 Y3 0 15.41724 29 94 Y4 0 9.77273 22 73 N2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)10100041501 ELYCOMING AVEAMS LAB0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 16.66250 72 80 Y2 0 13.59079 76 84 Y3 0 15.52927 82 89 Y4 0 13.41413 92 100 Y0014ROXY WATERPUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 11.90909 11 37 N2 0 14.47333 15 50 N3 0 15.03846 26 84 Y4 0 11.58095 21 70 N0020FORD RDBELMONT AVEWATER TREATPLANT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.74167 24 80 Y2 0 13.57500 28 93 Y3 0 15.62963 27 87 Y4 0 11.74138 29 97 Y0024GRANTASHTONROADS PHILANE AIRPORT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.00476 21 70 N2 0 12.31250 24 80 Y3 0 15.84348 23 74 N4 0 11.59500 40 87 Y0047500 SOUTHBROAD STREET- PARKINGLOT(CHS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 16.52667 15 50 N2 0 16.83889 18 60 N3 0 15.79130 23 74 N4 0 15.35000 14 47 N0136AMTRAK, 5917ELMWOODAVENUE0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 16.07778 63 70 N2 0 13.22899 69 76 Y3 0 14.47037 81 88 Y2003 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2003 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)4 0 12.33253 83 90 Y125 0005 CHARLER01WASTETREATMENTPLANT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.30000 29 97 Y2 0 14.59643 28 93 Y3 0 20.75806 31 100 Y4 0 10.90333 30 100 Y2 7 2 0 11.00000 1 7 N0200 MCCARRELLAND FAYETTESTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.72500 28 93 Y2 0 14.68214 28 93 Y3 0 20.11667 30 97 Y4 0 10.43000 30 100 Y5001 HILLMANSTATE PARK -KINGS CREEKROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.81494 87 97 Y2 0 14.32535 71 78 Y3 0 17.16914 81 88 Y4 0 10.29888 89 97 Y129 0008 DONOHOEROAD - PENNDOT MAINTDIST BLDG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.73000 30 100 Y2 0 14.31034 29 97 Y3 0 20.82500 28 90 Y4 0 11.42593 27 90 Y133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 18.18621 29 97 Y2 0 17.79130 23 77 Y3 0 19.34667 30 94 Y4 0 14.11034 29 97 Y2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)001 0001 NARSTO SITE -ARENDTSVILLE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.64505 91 100 Y2 0 13.79545 88 97 Y3 0 18.39667 90 98 Y4 0 10.87865 89 97 Y003 0008 BAPC 301 39THSTREET BLDG#70021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.68778 90 99 Y2 0 14.89884 86 95 Y3 0 21.65778 90 98 Y4 0 12.61098 82 89 Y0021 GLADSTONEHIGH SCHOOL0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.65385 26 77 Y2 0 13.62308 26 83 Y3 0 21.00333 30 90 Y4 0 11.10000 26 83 Y0064 2743Washington Blvd0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 16.68000 90 99 Y2 0 20.71591 88 97 Y3 0 26.30111 90 98 Y4 0 18.95854 82 89 Y0067 OLD OAKDALEROAD, SOUTHFAYETTE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.21852 27 81 Y2 0 12.65926 27 87 Y3 0 18.70000 25 74 N4 0 10.40909 22 70 N0093 PEARCE MILLROAD NORTHPARK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 7.93333 12 80 Y2 0 12.60909 11 73 N3 0 18.14667 15 94 Y4 0 10.45000 10 67 N2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)00951000 BEAVERGRADE RDCORAOPOLISPA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 9.46154 13 87 Y2 0 12.77857 14 93 Y3 0 19.85385 13 81 Y4 0 10.93333 12 80 Y0116405 WHEELERAVE, MCKEESROCKS, PA151320021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.21290 31 94 Y2 0 13.60357 28 93 Y3 0 21.71333 30 87 Y4 0 11.19130 23 73 N01335118 DORRISDRIVE,ELIZABETH0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.55333 15 100 Y2 0 12.96667 15 100 Y3 0 20.63750 16 100 Y4 0 9.91667 12 80 Y1008PACIFIC &IDAHO AVE,NATRONA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.45714 21 65 N2 0 13.36250 16 50 N3 0 20.46129 31 90 Y4 0 12.79412 17 53 N1301600 ANDERSONST, N.BRADDOCK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.13200 25 77 Y2 0 15.53077 26 83 Y3 0 21.84667 30 90 Y4 0 13.65769 26 83 Y3007501 Waddell Ave 0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.03846 13 87 Y2 0 13.08571 14 93 Y3 0 17.81333 15 94 Y4 0 13.26154 13 87 Y2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)9002SPRINGDALEJR HIGH,COLFAX &BUTLER0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 9.30769 13 87 Y2 0 12.05333 15 100 Y3 0 17.76250 16 100 Y4 0 10.83846 13 87 Y0070014EIGHT STREETAND RIVERALLEY0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.95806 31 100 Y2 0 15.40690 29 97 Y3 0 20.99032 31 100 Y4 0 12.15714 28 93 Y2 7 2 0 12.93333 3 20 N0110009UGI COMONGANTOWNRD ANDPROSPECT ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.99032 31 100 Y2 0 17.29310 29 93 Y3 0 17.35385 26 84 Y4 0 13.91071 28 93 Y0170012ROCKVIEWLANE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.42000 30 97 Y2 0 14.59333 30 100 Y3 0 13.82174 23 74 N4 0 11.34400 25 83 Y0210011MILLER AUTOSHOP 1MESSENGERST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.06774 31 100 Y2 0 13.75769 26 87 Y3 0 21.06333 30 97 Y4 0 10.77931 29 97 Y0270100PENN STATEUNIVERSITY -ARBORETUMSITE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.55930 86 95 Y2 0 13.52921 89 98 Y3 0 17.60989 91 99 Y2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)4 0 9.60976 82 89 Y029 0100 NEW GARDENAIRPORT -TOUGHKENAMON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.57333 30 97 Y2 0 15.59310 29 97 Y3 0 15.56957 23 74 N4 0 13.25263 19 63 N041 0101 IMPERIALCOURT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.39024 82 90 Y2 0 15.06941 85 93 Y3 0 18.57907 86 93 Y4 0 12.48333 90 98 Y043 0401 1833 UPSDRIVEHARRISBURGPA0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.15778 90 99 Y2 0 15.56705 88 97 Y3 0 18.67079 89 97 Y4 0 13.25287 87 95 Y045 0002 FRONT ST &NORRIS ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.33103 29 94 Y2 0 17.23214 28 93 Y3 0 16.52222 27 87 Y4 0 12.00690 29 97 Y2 7 2 0 4.40000 1 7 N4 0 13.20000 1 7 N049 0003 10TH ANDMARNESTREETS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.77033 91 100 Y2 0 12.32088 91 100 Y3 0 14.51477 88 96 Y4 0 8.92529 87 95 Y069 2006 GEORGE STTROOP ANDCITY OFSCRANTON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.45172 87 96 Y2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)2 0 11.98315 89 98 Y3 0 14.38202 89 97 Y4 0 9.58846 78 85 Y071 0007 ABRAHAMLINCOLN JRHIGHGROFFTOWNRD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 16.74839 31 100 Y2 0 16.51429 28 93 Y3 0 18.50323 31 100 Y4 0 14.81000 30 100 Y077 0004 STATEHOSPITALREAR 1600HANOVER AVE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.11294 85 93 Y2 0 15.09444 90 99 Y3 0 16.63152 92 100 Y4 0 11.28242 91 99 Y079 1101 CHILWICK &WASHINGTONSTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.91348 89 98 Y2 0 13.12738 84 92 Y3 0 15.01868 91 99 Y4 0 9.79398 83 90 Y085 0100 PA518 (NEWCASTLE ROAD)& PA4180851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.93333 84 92 Y2 0 12.87701 87 96 Y3 0 18.03371 89 97 Y4 0 10.65233 86 93 Y091 0013 STATEARMORY - 1046BELVOIR RD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.95161 31 100 Y2 0 14.41667 30 100 Y3 0 11.10000 14 45 N4 0 11.54444 27 90 Y2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)0950025WASHINGTON& CAMBRIASTS.FREEMANSBURG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.68636 88 97 Y2 0 14.14167 84 92 Y3 0 16.43444 90 98 Y4 0 11.57079 89 97 Y0990301ROUTE 34LITTLEBUFFALOSTATE PARK0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.00323 31 100 Y2 0 12.29000 30 100 Y3 0 16.00333 30 97 Y4 0 9.61667 30 100 Y10100041501 ELYCOMING AVEAMS LAB0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.53523 88 97 Y2 0 15.44133 75 82 Y3 0 14.69639 83 90 Y4 0 11.90449 89 97 Y0014ROXY WATERPUMP STA EVADEARNLEY STS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 11.12000 5 30 N0020FORD RDBELMONT AVEWATER TREATPLANT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.45172 29 94 Y2 0 15.53448 29 97 Y3 0 15.35333 30 97 Y4 0 12.20000 22 73 N0024GRANTASHTONROADS PHILANE AIRPORT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.54198 81 89 Y2 0 14.20227 88 97 Y3 0 14.29773 88 96 Y4 0 10.08947 76 83 Y2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)0047500 SOUTHBROAD STREET- PARKINGLOT(CHS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 14.22174 23 74 N2 0 15.37586 29 97 Y3 0 15.25484 31 100 Y4 0 12.70800 25 83 Y0136AMTRAK, 5917ELMWOODAVENUE0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.84023 87 96 Y2 0 14.04024 82 90 Y3 0 13.51209 91 99 Y4 0 10.51954 87 95 Y1250005CHARLER01WASTETREATMENTPLANT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.70000 29 94 Y2 0 13.73000 30 100 Y3 0 20.51000 30 97 Y4 0 11.00741 27 90 Y2 7 1 0 8.25000 2 13 N4 0 14.60000 17 N0200MCCARRELLAND FAYETTESTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.53226 31 100 Y2 0 13.54333 30 100 Y3 0 20.23333 30 97 Y4 0 11.25357 28 93 Y5001HILLMANSTATE PARK -KINGS CREEKROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.38659 82 90 Y2 0 13.51573 89 98 Y3 0 19.47111 90 98 Y4 0 9.46512 86 93 Y1290008DONOHOEROAD - PENNDOT MAINTDIST BLDG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.07333 30 97 Y2004 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2004 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)2 0 14.69655 29 97 Y3 0 22.02069 29 94 Y4 0 10.90667 30 100 Y133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 16.90333 30 97 Y2 0 16.65769 26 87 Y3 0 18.66538 26 84 Y4 0 13.91724 29 97 Y2 7 2 0 15.80000 2 13 N3 0 4.10000 1 6 N2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)0010001NARSTO SITE -ARENDTSVILLE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.81412 85 94 Y2 0 12.74889 90 99 Y3 0 18.25287 87 95 Y4 0 10.40465 86 93 Y0030008BAPC 301 39THSTREET BLDG#70021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.80337 89 99 Y2 0 15.35730 89 98 Y3 0 20.71630 92 100 Y4 0 13.40795 88 96 Y2 7 1 0 13.81333 15 100 Y2 0 14.88462 13 87 Y3 0 23.11333 15 100 Y4 0 13.02143 14 88 Y0021GLADSTONEHIGH SCHOOL0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.91071 28 93 Y2 0 14.98889 27 87 Y3 0 22.00333 30 100 Y4 0 11.48519 27 87 Y00642743Washington Blvd0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 16.28409 88 98 Y2 0 22.26444 90 99 Y3 0 26.00440 91 99 Y4 0 21.10116 86 93 Y2 7 1 0 16.04000 15 100 Y2 0 17.33636 11 73 N3 0 32.01538 13 87 Y4 0 27.33333 15 94 Y0067OLD OAKDALEROAD, SOUTHFAYETTE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.32308 26 87 Y2 0 13.95000 28 90 Y2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)3 0 20.35172 29 93 Y4 0 10.25556 27 87 Y0093 PEARCE MILLROAD NORTHPARK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.66154 13 87 Y2 0 13.82727 11 73 N3 0 23.65833 12 80 Y4 0 9.63077 13 81 Y0095 1000 BEAVERGRADE RDCORAOPOLISPA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.79286 14 93 Y2 0 14.49231 13 87 Y3 0 21.55000 14 93 Y4 0 9.83333 15 94 Y0116 405 WHEELERAVE, MCKEESROCKS, PA151320021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.81739 23 77 Y2 0 16.42414 29 94 Y3 0 21.68214 28 93 Y4 0 12.66154 26 84 Y0133 5118 DORRISDRIVE,ELIZABETH0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.53571 14 93 Y2 0 12.61538 13 87 Y3 0 20.50769 13 87 Y4 0 9.51111 9 82 Y1008 PACIFIC &IDAHO AVE,NATRONA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.78667 30 100 Y2 0 15.60345 29 94 Y3 0 21.90000 30 100 Y4 0 13.51724 29 94 Y1301 600 ANDERSONST, N.BRADDOCK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.38966 29 97 Y2 0 16.85862 29 94 Y2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)3 0 23.89655 29 97 Y4 0 13.49583 24 77 Y2 7 1 0 15.32308 13 87 Y2 0 14.43571 14 93 Y3 0 28.13333 9 60 N4 0 15.05000 14 88 Y3007 501 Waddell Ave 0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.13333 15 100 Y2 0 14.24615 13 87 Y3 0 24.35714 14 93 Y4 0 12.71333 15 94 Y9002 SPRINGDALEJR HIGH,COLFAX &BUTLER0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.95385 13 87 Y2 0 14.00769 13 87 Y3 0 21.32143 14 93 Y4 0 11.24667 15 94 Y007 0014 EIGHT STREETAND RIVERALLEY0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.50741 27 90 Y2 0 18.67241 29 94 Y3 0 23.30357 28 93 Y4 0 16.73600 25 81 Y2 7 1 0 14.61429 14 93 Y2 0 17.70000 14 93 Y3 0 20.16000 10 67 N4 0 14.08000 10 63 N011 0009 UGI COMONGANTOWNRD ANDPROSPECT ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 18.65556 27 90 Y2 0 13.21290 31 100 Y3 0 20.06207 29 97 Y4 0 15.27742 31 100 Y017 0012 ROCKVIEWLANE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.45556 27 90 Y2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)2 0 11.57857 28 90 Y3 0 17.62800 25 83 Y4 0 13.71000 30 97 Y021 0011 MILLER AUTOSHOP 1MESSENGERST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.10667 30 100 Y2 0 15.66000 30 97 Y3 0 24.68621 29 97 Y4 0 12.74138 29 94 Y027 0100 PENN STATEUNIVERSITY -ARBORETUMSITE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.60805 87 97 Y2 0 12.23140 86 95 Y3 0 17.78272 81 88 Y4 0 10.93000 90 98 Y029 0100 NEW GARDENAIRPORT -TOUGHKENAMON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 17.05714 14 47 N2 0 13.15000 20 65 N3 0 19.63929 28 93 Y4 0 13.61935 31 100 Y041 0101 IMPERIALCOURT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.66049 81 90 Y2 0 12.94835 91 100 Y3 0 18.64886 88 96 Y4 0 12.46471 85 92 Y043 0401 1833 UPSDRIVEHARRISBURGPA0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 16.23704 81 90 Y2 0 14.00390 77 85 Y3 0 18.72333 90 98 Y4 0 13.06444 90 98 Y045 0002 FRONT ST &NORRIS ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 16.85714 28 93 Y2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)2 0 14.04400 25 81 Y3 0 19.21667 30 100 Y4 0 15.93333 27 87 Y2 7 1 0 17.99286 14 93 Y2 0 11.93077 13 87 Y3 0 20.97143 14 93 Y4 0 16.76000 10 63 N049 0003 10TH ANDMARNESTREETS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.82333 90 100 Y2 0 14.80805 87 96 Y3 0 17.64512 82 89 Y4 0 11.14304 79 86 Y069 2006 GEORGE STTROOP ANDCITY OFSCRANTON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.36538 78 87 Y2 0 11.83846 91 100 Y3 0 16.36778 90 98 Y4 0 10.39512 82 89 Y071 0007 ABRAHAMLINCOLN JRHIGHGROFFTOWNRD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 21.30000 30 100 Y2 0 14.29667 30 97 Y3 0 21.06333 30 100 Y4 0 16.09355 31 97 Y077 0004 STATEHOSPITALREAR 1600HANOVER AVE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.74268 82 91 Y2 0 12.50353 85 93 Y3 0 17.75652 92 100 Y4 0 12.91196 92 100 Y2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)0791101CHILWICK &WASHINGTONSTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.00556 90 100 Y2 0 12.56364 88 97 Y3 0 16.81739 92 100 Y4 0 10.66860 86 93 Y0850100PA518 (NEWCASTLE ROAD)& PA4180851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.06047 86 96 Y2 0 13.37442 86 95 Y3 0 17.39877 81 88 Y4 0 12.50805 87 95 Y0910013STATEARMORY - 1046BELVOIR RD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.82500 28 93 Y2 0 9.58000 15 48 N3 0 12.74167 12 40 N4 0 12.77419 31 100 Y0950025WASHINGTON& CAMBRIASTS.FREEMANSBURG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.79268 82 91 Y2 0 12.32706 85 93 Y3 0 17.63444 90 98 Y4 0 13.03187 91 99 Y0990301ROUTE 34LITTLEBUFFALOSTATE PARK0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.30370 27 90 Y2 0 11.42258 31 100 Y3 0 17.63000 30 100 Y4 0 10.12667 30 97 Y1010003COMM HEALTHSERVICES 500S BROADSTREET0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 4 0 14.35000 62 93 Y2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)00041501 ELYCOMING AVEAMS LAB0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.22727 55 61 N2 0 13.06230 61 67 N3 0 17.25897 78 85 Y4 0 13.28243 74 80 Y0020FORD RDBELMONT AVEWATER TREATPLANT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 15.50526 19 83 Y0024GRANTASHTONROADS PHILANE AIRPORT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.68378 37 41 N2 0 10.75556 54 59 N3 0 16.25672 67 73 N4 0 12.01690 71 77 Y0047500 SOUTHBROAD STREET- PARKINGLOT(CHS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 16.99474 19 63 N2 0 12.03571 28 90 Y3 0 18.90769 26 87 Y4 0 12.30833 12 39 N0136AMTRAK, 5917ELMWOODAVENUE0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.56512 86 96 Y2 0 11.40225 89 98 Y3 0 19.05517 29 32 N4 0 12.90909 33 36 N1250005CHARLER01WASTETREATMENTPLANT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.97143 28 93 Y2 0 16.32857 28 90 Y3 0 24.15333 30 100 Y4 0 11.96774 31 100 Y2 7 1 0 13.11538 13 87 Y2 0 14.38462 13 87 Y2005 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2005 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean(Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteriaInd(Qrtrly)3 0 26.76250 8 53 N4 0 12.55333 15 94 Y0200 MCCARRELLAND FAYETTESTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.68667 30 100 Y2 0 16.01724 29 94 Y3 0 22.07667 30 100 Y4 0 11.74516 31 100 Y5001 HILLMANSTATE PARK -KINGS CREEKROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.61034 87 97 Y2 0 14.91136 88 97 Y3 0 19.22439 82 89 Y4 0 11.18764 89 97 Y129 0008 DONOHOEROAD - PENNDOT MAINTDIST BLDG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.62069 29 97 Y2 0 17.54000 30 97 Y3 0 23.11071 28 93 Y4 0 12.96786 28 90 Y133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 19.15862 29 97 Y2 0 15.65000 28 90 Y3 0 21.71786 28 93 Y4 0 15.97037 27 87 Y2 7 1 0 24.60000 11 73 N2 0 12.66923 13 87 Y3 0 20.83571 14 93 Y4 0 13.17857 14 88 Y2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)001 0001 NARSTO SITE -ARENDTSVILLE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 9.32159 88 98 Y2 0 10.79333 90 99 Y3 0 16.87333 90 98 Y4 0 10.27935 92 100 Y003 0008 BAPC 301 39THSTREET BLDG#70021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.60118 85 94 Y2 0 13.27528 89 98 Y3 0 20.18901 91 99 Y4 0 12.54130 92 100 Y2 7 1 0 13.28000 15 100 Y2 0 12.39333 15 100 Y3 0 17.20000 14 93 Y4 0 12.38667 15 94 Y0064 2743Washington Blvd0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.86353 85 94 Y2 0 17.89333 90 99 Y3 0 22.38659 82 89 Y4 0 20.98523 88 96 Y2 7 1 0 17.56667 15 100 Y2 0 11.89167 12 80 Y3 0 24.01111 18 93 Y4 0 17.45333 15 94 Y0067 OLD OAKDALEROAD, SOUTHFAYETTE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 9.60870 23 77 Y2 0 9.51538 26 87 Y3 0 16.39286 28 90 Y4 0 9.05714 21 65 N0093 PEARCE MILLROAD NORTHPARK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.37143 14 93 Y2 0 9.85000 6 40 N3 0 16.37692 13 87 Y2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)4 0 9.40769 13 81Y00951000 BEAVERGRADE RDCORAOPOLISPA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.01538 13 87Y2 0 10.96923 13 87Y3 0 18.21538 13 87Y4 0 10.30714 14 88Y1008PACIFIC &IDAHO AVE,NATRONA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.87407 27 90Y2 0 14.30000 23 77Y3 0 18.31786 28 90Y4 0 11.62800 25 81Y1301600 ANDERSONST, N.BRADDOCK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.70435 23 77Y2 0 14.91111 27 90Y3 0 19.78462 26 84Y4 0 12.73929 28 90Y2 7 1 0 14.76429 14 93Y2 0 13.63846 13 87Y3 0 20.42143 14 93Y4 0 12.98000 15 94Y3007501 Waddell Ave 0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.92667 15 100 Y2 0 13.50667 15 100 Y3 0 19.15714 14 93Y4 0 12.36000 15 94Y0070014EIGHT STREETAND RIVERALLEY0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.06552 29 97Y2 0 13.34643 28 93Y3 0 17.57083 24 77Y4 0 14.48846 26 84Y2 7 1 0 15.84667 15 100 Y2 0 10.24167 12 80Y2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)3 0 17.57692 13 87Y4 0 16.34615 13 81Y0110009UGI COMONGANTOWNRD ANDPROSPECT ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.05333 30 100 Y2 0 9.29231 13 87Y0010503 NORTH 6THSTREET0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 2 0 16.93333 12 80Y3 0 15.34286 28 90Y4 0 12.33226 31 100 Y0170012ROCKVIEWLANE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.73333 27 90Y2 0 9.95652 23 77Y3 0 13.72174 23 74N4 0 11.18387 31 100 Y0210011MILLER AUTOSHOP 1MESSENGERST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.08571 28 93Y2 0 13.65385 26 87Y3 0 19.42903 31 100 Y4 0 12.97097 31 100 Y0270100PENN STATEUNIVERSITY -ARBORETUMSITE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 9.21705 88 98Y2 0 10.33333 90 99Y3 0 15.36818 88 96Y4 0 10.58605 86 93Y0290100NEW GARDENAIRPORT -TOUGHKENAMON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.67273 11 37N2 0 12.71786 28 93Y3 0 14.10833 24 77Y4 0 11.85862 29 94Y2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0410101IMPERIALCOURT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.83951 81 90Y2 0 11.04762 84 92Y3 0 15.93125 80 87Y4 0 13.19333 90 98Y04304011833 UPSDRIVEHARRISBURGPA0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.90930 86 96Y2 0 11.81154 78 86Y3 0 17.24022 92 100 Y4 0 13.82333 90 98Y0450002FRONT ST &NORRIS ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.05172 29 97Y2 0 12.99231 26 87Y3 0 15.27407 27 87Y4 0 13.64000 20 65N2 7 1 0 16.41429 14 93Y2 0 13.06923 13 87Y3 0 16.40000 13 87Y4 0 11.77500 12 75Y049000310TH ANDMARNESTREETS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.86667 57 63N2 0 10.73333 90 99Y3 0 14.21429 63 68N4 0 9.46047 86 93Y0692006GEORGE STTROOP ANDCITY OFSCRANTON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 9.37778 90 100 Y2 0 9.57297 74 81Y3 0 13.73409 88 96Y4 0 9.75802 81 88Y2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0710007ABRAHAMLINCOLN JRHIGHGROFFTOWNRD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.34000 30 100 Y2 0 12.53103 29 97Y3 0 14.72500 28 90Y4 0 13.86000 30 97Y0850100PA518 (NEWCASTLE ROAD)& PA4180851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.55366 82 91Y2 0 9.49623 53 58N3 0 16.26341 82 89Y4 0 11.03529 85 92Y0910013STATEARMORY - 1046BELVOIR RD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.02500 28 93Y2 0 11.10000 28 93Y3 0 14.12000 25 81Y4 0 10.96786 28 90Y0950025WASHINGTON& CAMBRIASTS.FREEMANSBURG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.06404 89 99Y2 0 11.12841 88 97Y3 0 16.05385 91 99Y4 0 11.74730 74 80Y1010003COMM HEALTHSERVICES 500S BROADSTREET0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.20941 85 94Y2 0 8.73846 26 29N00041501 ELYCOMING AVEAMS LAB0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.36456 79 88Y2 0 11.98485 66 73N3 0 17.02708 48 52N2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)4 0 12.53049 82 89Y2 7 1 0 16.50667 15 100 Y2 0 10.40714 14 93Y3 0 15.60000 12 80Y4 0 10.35000 16 100 Y0024GRANTASHTONROADS PHILANE AIRPORT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 11.51765 34 38N2 0 10.56286 70 77Y3 0 16.17042 71 77Y4 0 11.33625 80 87Y0047500 SOUTHBROAD STREET- PARKINGLOT(CHS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 14.44500 40 44N2 0 14.56567 67 74N3 0 18.03556 45 49N4 0 15.04043 47 51N0136AMTRAK, 5917ELMWOODAVENUE0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 11.96809 47 52N2 0 12.05600 50 55N3 0 16.29114 79 86Y4 0 12.25068 73 79Y1250005CHARLER01WASTETREATMENTPLANT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.93000 30 100 Y2 0 13.97241 29 97Y3 0 19.25484 31 100 Y4 0 12.50345 29 94Y2 7 1 0 13.87143 14 93Y2 0 13.02308 13 87Y3 0 19.15333 15 100 Y4 0 11.51538 13 81Y2006 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2006 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0200MCCARRELLAND FAYETTESTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.92333 30 100 Y2 0 10.90556 18 60N3 0 18.71290 31 100 Y4 0 11.77143 28 90Y5001HILLMANSTATE PARK -KINGS CREEKROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 8.62766 47 52N2 0 11.70000 78 86Y3 0 17.39701 67 73N4 0 10.03882 85 92Y1290008DONOHOEROAD - PENNDOT MAINTDIST BLDG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.29000 30 100 Y2 0 13.77333 30 100 Y3 0 20.41000 30 97Y4 0 11.78667 30 97Y1330008HILL ST.0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.08214 28 90Y2 0 13.18276 29 97Y3 0 16.14000 25 81Y4 0 12.75667 30 97Y2 7 1 0 17.50000 14 93Y2 0 11.39167 12 80Y3 0 16.65833 12 80Y4 0 12.36000 15 94Y2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)001 0001 NARSTO SITE -ARENDTSVILLE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 9.72532 79 88 Y2 0 11.94051 79 87 Y3 0 15.88444 90 98 Y4 0 11.69512 82 89 Y003 0008 BAPC 301 39THSTREET BLDG#70021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 11.82976 84 93 Y2 0 14.88095 84 92 Y3 0 20.30000 86 93 Y4 0 12.54023 87 95 Y2 7 1 0 12.29333 15 100 Y2 0 12.31538 13 87 Y3 0 22.16923 13 87 Y4 0 15.10000 14 93 Y0064 2743Washington Blvd0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.15795 88 98 Y2 0 18.63667 90 99 Y3 0 25.15824 91 99 Y4 0 17.57111 90 98 Y2 7 1 0 19.02857 14 93 Y2 0 14.65714 14 93 Y3 0 25.09333 15 100 Y4 0 19.63571 14 93 Y0067 OLD OAKDALEROAD, SOUTHFAYETTE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.27895 19 63 N2 0 13.40400 25 80 Y3 0 19.46429 28 90 Y4 0 10.72692 26 87 Y0093 PEARCE MILLROAD NORTHPARK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 9.67333 15 100 Y2 0 10.50000 12 80 Y2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)3 0 19.35000 14 93Y4 0 12.57143 14 93Y00951000 BEAVERGRADE RDCORAOPOLISPA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 10.95714 14 93Y2 0 9.89231 13 87Y3 0 20.79333 15 100 Y4 0 12.90000 14 93Y1008PACIFIC &IDAHO AVE,NATRONA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.78519 27 87Y2 0 14.55185 27 90Y3 0 19.68333 30 97Y4 0 13.22593 27 90Y1301600 ANDERSONST, N.BRADDOCK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.55926 27 90Y2 0 15.18148 27 90Y3 0 21.62000 30 97Y4 0 15.15769 26 87Y2 7 1 0 14.47857 14 93Y2 0 12.30000 13 87Y3 0 23.60000 13 87Y4 0 16.55385 13 87Y3007501 Waddell Ave 0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.36429 14 93Y2 0 13.02857 14 93Y3 0 21.18571 14 93Y4 0 13.84615 13 87Y0070014EIGHT STREETAND RIVERALLEY0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.32500 28 93Y2 0 16.30714 28 93Y3 0 17.97857 14 45N4 0 15.28276 29 97Y2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)2 7 1 0 13.38667 15 100 Y2 0 14.70769 13 87 Y3 0 20.32667 15 100 Y4 0 17.76667 15 100 Y011 0010 503 NORTH 6THSTREET0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 16.67333 30 100 Y2 0 9.85294 17 85 Y0011 1059 ArnoldRoad0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 3 0 15.62258 31 100 Y4 0 14.94483 29 97 Y017 0012 ROCKVIEWLANE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.06800 25 83 Y2 0 12.83333 27 90 Y3 0 13.02609 23 74 N4 0 13.15714 28 93 Y021 0011 MILLER AUTOSHOP 1MESSENGERST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.97333 30 100 Y2 0 13.58000 20 67 N3 0 17.47857 28 90 Y4 0 13.65667 30 100 Y027 0100 PENN STATEUNIVERSITY -ARBORETUMSITE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.07640 89 99 Y2 0 11.85055 91 100 Y3 0 15.49111 90 98 Y4 0 10.28750 88 96 Y2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0290100NEW GARDENAIRPORT -TOUGHKENAMON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.68077 26 87Y2 0 13.31000 20 67N3 0 14.40476 21 68N4 0 13.87200 25 83Y0410101IMPERIALCOURT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.12692 78 87Y2 0 12.79765 85 93Y3 0 16.53103 87 95Y4 0 13.34684 79 86Y04304011833 UPSDRIVEHARRISBURGPA0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.97625 80 89Y2 0 13.65227 88 97Y3 0 16.73529 85 92Y4 0 13.74512 82 89Y0450002FRONT ST &NORRIS ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.33913 23 77Y2 0 14.68000 25 83Y3 0 16.41200 25 81Y4 0 13.37826 23 77Y2 7 1 0 13.42308 13 87Y2 0 12.42667 15 100 Y3 0 16.75333 15 100 Y4 0 17.49231 13 87Y2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)049000310TH ANDMARNESTREETS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.30667 75 83Y2 0 13.10706 85 93Y3 0 13.98701 77 84Y4 0 10.82405 79 86Y0692006GEORGE STTROOP ANDCITY OFSCRANTON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 8.99213 89 99Y2 0 10.57442 86 95Y3 0 14.65227 88 96Y4 0 10.91690 71 77Y0710007ABRAHAMLINCOLN JRHIGHGROFFTOWNRD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 16.63103 29 97Y2 0 14.20333 30 100 Y3 0 15.92000 30 97Y4 0 14.83571 28 93Y0850100PA518 (NEWCASTLE ROAD)& PA4180851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.55814 86 96Y2 0 14.11786 84 92Y3 0 15.91463 82 89Y4 0 12.03373 83 90Y2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0910013STATEARMORY - 1046BELVOIR RD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.91724 29 97Y2 0 12.45333 30 100 Y3 0 15.10000 27 87Y4 0 12.90769 26 87Y0950025WASHINGTON& CAMBRIASTS.FREEMANSBURG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.97753 89 99Y2 0 11.61519 79 87Y3 0 16.35281 89 97Y4 0 13.28667 90 98Y10100041501 ELYCOMING AVEAMS LAB0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.63023 86 96Y2 0 13.20429 70 77Y3 0 15.14651 86 93Y4 0 12.96333 90 98Y2 7 1 0 12.12500 12 80Y2 0 11.41000 10 67N3 0 17.64545 11 73N4 0 15.11429 14 93Y0024GRANTASHTONROADS PHILANE AIRPORT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.05172 87 97Y2 0 12.75690 58 64N3 0 14.87674 86 93Y4 0 11.73444 90 98Y0047500 SOUTHBROAD STREET- PARKINGLOT(CHS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 14.49296 71 79Y2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)2 0 13.04915 59 65N3 0 16.40000 84 91Y4 0 13.55056 89 97Y4 7 3 0 15.90476 84 91Y4 0 13.81364 88 96Y0057240 SpringGarden Street0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 3 0 10.95556 18 20N4 0 13.12778 90 98Y4 7 4 0 17.45000 4 100 Y0136AMTRAK, 5917ELMWOODAVENUE0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.60000 75 83Y2 0 13.38000 65 71N3 0 14.36111 72 78Y4 0 12.99268 82 89Y1250005CHARLER01WASTETREATMENTPLANT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.63462 26 87Y2 0 15.46897 29 97Y3 0 22.32333 30 97Y4 0 12.62759 29 97Y2 7 1 0 13.00833 12 80Y2 0 14.19333 15 100 Y3 0 23.92143 14 93Y4 0 15.02667 15 100 Y0200MCCARRELLAND FAYETTESTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.73667 30 100 Y2 0 15.37857 28 93Y3 0 20.47097 31 100 Y4 0 11.72759 29 97Y2007 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2007 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)5001HILLMANSTATE PARK -KINGS CREEKROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 9.71724 87 97Y2 0 14.17284 81 89Y3 0 19.83837 86 93Y4 0 11.42472 89 97Y1290008DONOHOEROAD - PENNDOT MAINTDIST BLDG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.14643 28 93Y2 0 16.03793 29 97Y3 0 21.21724 29 94Y4 0 11.62069 29 97Y1330008HILL ST.0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.68276 29 97Y2 0 15.13000 30 100 Y3 0 17.16000 30 97Y4 0 14.73000 30 100 Y2 7 1 0 13.70000 13 87Y2 0 13.06667 15 100 Y3 0 16.46000 15 100 Y4 0 16.60667 15 100 Y2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)001 0001 NARSTO SITE -ARENDTSVILLE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.20723 83 91 Y2 0 12.65926 81 89 Y3 0 12.98427 89 97 Y4 0 7.94368 87 95 Y003 0008 BAPC 301 39THSTREET BLDG#70021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.65843 89 98 Y2 0 11.83563 87 96 Y3 5 16.38471 85 92 Y4 0 10.60330 91 99 Y2 7 1 0 12.86429 14 88 Y2 0 11.04000 15 100 Y3 5 17.92000 15 100 Y4 0 10.29286 14 93 Y0064 2743Washington Blvd0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.16333 90 99 Y2 0 17.37889 90 99 Y3 0 20.68202 89 97 Y4 0 15.77191 89 97 Y2 7 1 0 14.82857 14 88 Y2 0 18.02857 14 93 Y3 0 26.00000 14 93 Y4 0 13.04615 13 87 Y0067 OLD OAKDALEROAD, SOUTHFAYETTE0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 9.90800 25 81 Y2 0 9.83571 28 93 Y3 0 14.62500 28 90 Y4 0 8.69630 27 90 Y1008 PACIFIC &IDAHO AVE,NATRONA0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 13.63077 26 84 Y2 0 10.87143 28 93 Y3 0 17.02000 30 97 Y2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)4 0 12.04783 23 77Y1301600 ANDERSONST, N.BRADDOCK0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 14.02917 24 77Y2 0 13.64800 25 83Y3 0 17.86552 29 94Y4 0 11.05185 27 90Y2 7 1 0 14.14286 14 88Y2 0 13.64286 14 93Y3 0 18.62857 14 93Y4 0 10.43571 14 93Y3007501 Waddell Ave 0021 AlleghenyCounty,PAHealthDepartment1 7 1 0 12.63571 14 88Y2 0 11.70714 14 93Y3 0 18.56667 15 100 Y4 0 10.38667 15 100 Y0070014EIGHT STREETAND RIVERALLEY0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.38710 31 100 Y2 0 12.24231 26 87Y3 0 16.62143 28 90Y4 0 11.51379 29 97Y2 7 1 0 14.25385 13 81Y2 0 12.30000 10 67N3 0 18.99231 13 87Y4 0 11.49167 12 80Y01100111059 ArnoldRoad0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.10357 28 90Y2 0 11.75517 29 97Y3 0 13.12143 28 90Y4 0 9.95806 31 100 Y2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0170012ROCKVIEWLANE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.50769 26 84Y2 0 13.14444 18 60N3 0 12.73448 29 94Y4 0 10.26333 30 100 Y0210011MILLER AUTOSHOP 1MESSENGERST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.51290 31 100 Y2 0 12.93000 30 100 Y3 0 16.67097 31 100 Y4 0 10.32667 30 100 Y0270100PENN STATEUNIVERSITY -ARBORETUMSITE0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.66703 91 100 Y2 0 10.43333 90 99Y3 0 13.07912 91 99Y4 0 7.97701 87 95Y0290100NEW GARDENAIRPORT -TOUGHKENAMON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 16.27619 21 68N2 0 13.49600 25 83Y3 0 14.34828 29 94Y4 0 10.60741 27 90Y0410101IMPERIALCOURT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 14.78764 89 98Y2 0 12.97273 88 97Y3 0 13.96932 88 96Y4 0 10.40667 90 98Y04304011833 UPSDRIVEHARRISBURGPA0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.39195 87 96Y2 0 13.09048 84 92Y2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)3 0 13.83516 91 99Y4 0 10.40471 85 92Y0450002FRONT ST &NORRIS ST0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.17200 25 81Y2 0 14.52000 25 83Y3 0 14.27037 27 87Y4 0 11.39643 28 93Y2 7 1 0 14.26667 15 94Y2 0 13.54545 11 73N3 0 16.83333 12 80Y4 0 11.70000 13 87Y049000310TH ANDMARNESTREETS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 11.79667 90 99Y2 0 10.15795 88 97Y3 0 13.30123 81 88Y4 0 7.61098 82 89Y0692006GEORGE STTROOP ANDCITY OFSCRANTON0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.57407 81 89Y2 0 10.17778 90 99Y3 0 11.64457 92 100 Y4 0 7.82791 86 93Y0710007ABRAHAMLINCOLN JRHIGHGROFFTOWNRD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 17.10323 31 100 Y2 0 12.78621 29 97Y3 0 14.32143 28 90Y4 0 11.50385 26 83Y0850100PA518 (NEWCASTLE ROAD)& PA4180851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.14167 72 79Y2 0 10.42809 89 98Y3 0 14.42024 84 91Y4 0 9.45169 89 97Y2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)0910013STATEARMORY - 1046BELVOIR RD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.57241 29 94Y2 0 10.87778 27 90Y3 0 12.89667 30 97Y4 0 10.29565 23 77Y0950025WASHINGTON& CAMBRIASTS.FREEMANSBURG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.63407 91 100 Y2 0 12.05506 89 98Y3 0 13.10444 90 98Y4 0 10.26000 90 98Y10100041501 ELYCOMING AVEAMS LAB0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.24943 87 96Y2 0 14.33721 86 95Y3 0 14.28652 89 97Y4 0 10.14783 92 100 Y2 7 1 0 12.96250 16 100 Y2 0 11.23846 13 87Y3 0 14.52308 13 87Y4 0 11.31667 12 80Y0024GRANTASHTONROADS PHILANE AIRPORT0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 12.50889 90 99Y2 0 12.47701 87 96Y3 0 13.54318 88 96Y4 0 9.42857 91 99Y0047500 SOUTHBROAD STREET- PARKINGLOT(CHS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 14.37667 90 99Y2 0 14.39059 85 93Y3 0 14.74615 91 99Y4 0 10.47444 90 98Y4 7 1 0 14.00110 91 100 Y2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)2 0 13.93750 80 88Y3 0 14.37045 88 96Y4 0 10.53636 88 96Y005524TH & RITNERSTREETS0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.90411 73 88Y2 0 15.07349 83 91Y3 0 14.42289 83 90Y4 0 10.57500 92 100 Y0057240 SpringGarden Street0861 Philadelphia AirManagementServices1 7 1 0 13.53778 90 99Y2 0 14.63407 91 100 Y3 0 14.69091 77 84Y4 0 10.29891 92 100 Y4 7 1 0 13.29518 83 91Y2 0 13.84556 90 99Y3 0 14.37442 86 93Y4 0 10.19880 83 90Y1250005CHARLER01WASTETREATMENTPLANT0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.72500 28 90Y2 0 11.93333 30 100 Y3 0 16.76429 28 90Y4 0 10.70714 28 93Y2 7 1 0 14.10769 13 81Y2 0 10.90000 15 100 Y3 0 18.41667 12 80Y4 0 10.45000 14 93Y0200MCCARRELLAND FAYETTESTS0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 13.00357 28 90Y2 0 11.26538 26 87Y3 0 14.94333 30 97Y4 0 9.86923 26 87Y2008 Pennsylvania Quarterly PM 2.5 Monitoring DataExtracted from the US EPA Air Quality System (AQS) Discoverer Systemhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/aqsdiscover/Summary Year (Quarterly):2008 Parameter Desc:Pm2.5 - Local Conditions State Abbr:PA State Code:42County Code Site ID Street Address Support AgencyCodeAgency Desc POC Dur Code SummQrtrExcptnlData TypeIDArithmeticMean (Qrtrly)Count ofObs(Qrtrly)Percent ofObs (Qrtrly)SummCriteria Ind(Qrtrly)5001HILLMANSTATE PARK -KINGS CREEKROAD0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 10.21250 88 97Y2 0 11.17284 81 89Y3 0 15.22188 64 70 N4 0 8.60575 87 95 Y129 0008 DONOHOEROAD - PENNDOT MAINTDIST BLDG0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 12.70645 31 100 Y2 0 12.10000 26 87 Y3 0 16.24074 27 87 Y4 0 9.64000 30 100 Y133 0008 HILL ST. 0851 PennsylvaniaDepartment OfEnvironmentalProtection1 7 1 0 15.61200 25 81 Y2 0 13.81786 28 93 Y3 0 14.66552 29 94 Y4 0 10.44839 31 100 Y2 7 1 0 14.86250 16 100 Y2 0 10.92308 13 87 Y3 0 14.91429 14 93 Y4 0 11.53846 13 87 Y

# A. Introduction

This document describes the methodology used by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to develop inventories of air pollutants emitted as required by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule (CERR) (40 CFR Part 51, Subpart A). The 2002 inventory will also be the base year inventory for State Impl ementation Plan (SIP) revision development for PM 2.5 

### , 8- hour ozone and regional haze.

The CERR requires the Commonwealth to report actual emissions for the following pollutants: sulfur oxides, volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, lead and lead compounds, primary PM 2.5 

### , primary PM 10 

### , and ammonia (40 CFR 51.15(a)). The CERR lists primary PM as an optional pollutant for reporting purposes. The CE RR does not require the submission of hazardous air pollutant emissions data.

Emissions from point sources are reported for 65 of the Commonwealth’s 67 counties. Point source emissions from sources located in Allegheny County are reported directly to EPA by the Allegheny County Health Department. Point source emissions from sources located in Philadelphia Counties are reported directly by the Philadelphia County H ealth Department, Air Management Services.

The annual emission inventory must be temporally resolved to provide seasonal data for air quality modeling purposes. Temporal adjustments to the annual inventory are made because of seasonal differences in the rate of emissions or activity, or to apportion emissions to a particular season or day. For the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) emissions inventory, VOC, NO

x 

### , and CO emissions are reported as actual annual and actual summer weekday. Summer weekday emissions are defined as an average day’s emissions for a typical summer day during the ozone season.
For the PM 2.5 

### NAAQS and regional haze rule emission inve ntories, direct emissions (including condensibles) of PM10 and PM 2.5 

### , and the precursor VOC, NO

x 

### , SOx, and NH3 are reported as actual
annual data.

For the ozone SIP inventories, rule effectiveness and rule penetration are applied. Rule effectiveness reflects the ability of a regulatory program to achieve all the emission reductions that could have been achieved by full compliance with the applicable regulations at all sources at all times. Rule penetration is an estimate of the extent to which a regulation covers emissions from an area source category for a specified control area. Rule penetration is applied to the control efficiency for a regulation to account for less than 100 percent coverage of the emissions for an area source category. Because the inventory was developed prior to EPA’s issuance of the November, 2005 revision to the rule effectiveness guidance, Commonwealth followed the previous EPA guidan ce and assumed an 80% rule effectiveness for applicable sources unless specified to the contrary.



# B. Point Sources

A point source is a stationary, identifiable source of air pollution that usually emits the air pollutants through a stack or vent. A facility contains one or more point sources and is not limited to industrial facilities. Examples of an air pollution facility are steel mills, oil refineries, electric generating facilities, and coal preparation plants. A non-industrial facility may contain a large boiler or other air pollution

source.



## 1

### The data for the 2002 and 2004 sulfur oxides, vola tile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, lead and lead compounds, primary PM 2.5 

### , primary PM 10 

### , and ammonia point source emission inventory is derived from the Pennsylvania Air Information Management System (AIMS). AIMS sources are identified and inventoried by Pennsylva nia regional air quality offices through permitting operations and regional and central office field inspecti ons and surveys. The AIMS system is designed to include all point source emission categories as required by the CERR.

The AIMS database is linked to the Department ’s eFACTS (Environment Facility, Application, Compliance Tracking System) database. This allows Department-wide sharing of data for all program areas. In addition, the public is provided better access to the information through the Department’s
Internet website.

The point source inventories for Allegheny and Phila delphia Counties will be prepared by the Allegheny County Health Department and the Philadelphia Coun ty Health Department, respectively. The two county agencies will submit their point source emissi on inventories directly to EPA’s National Emission Inventory as required by the CERR. The county agenci es will also provide their point source data to the Department in order that effective State Impl ementation Plan preparation may be undertaken.

Paper Submittal of Inventory Data Annually, facilities complete worksheets for each source that operated and emitted pollutants for the year. Data required for processes include monthly material throughputs, days and weeks the sources operated, material processed, maximum throughput per hour, and correct Source Classification Code (SCC) number. In addition to these process data, combustion unit data must include fuel used, fuel
characteristics such as sulfur content and Btu. For ea ch source, an estimate of total criteria and hazardous pollutant emissions must be supplied, along with th e estimation method. If emissions are estimated using anything other than emissions f actors from SCC codes, methodology must be provided. In addition to emissions estimates for each piece of equipment, site emissions are required. If there is equipment that is too small for individual reporting, emissions from this equipment will be reflected in the site total.

After the facilities provide these data, DEP reviewers input the data into the AIMS system. At this time, the system may create an error message if emissions are significantly different from those expected, based upon emissions factors and throughputs. At this point , the reviewer must determine if the estimate is accurate and may either override the error message or contact the facility for corrections, which are then input by the reviewer.



## After all data are entered, reports are generated to show comparis ons between emissions years. If there are significant differences, reviewers must determine why emissions are different. Explanations may include changes in producti on or change in material input. Once all discrepancies have been corrected or explaine d, the data are accepted, and the inventory is considered complete.

Instructions Available DEP has developed instructions for companies to complete the annual inventory submission, which describes the database fields in the AIMS/eFACTS syst em. This document is revised annually to reflect any new guidance for the applicable reporting year.

Information on the emission inventory reporting system can be found at: www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/airwaste/aq/emission/Emission_Inventory.htm . Instructions for the system are attached.



## 2

# INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE ANNUAL EMISSIONS
REPORTING FORMS

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Edward G. Rendell, Governor Kathleen McGinty, Secretary Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Departm ent of Environmental Protection

2700-BK-DEP1936 Rev. 12/2005

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Table of Contents

1. Background

..................................................................................................................... ................................... 1

1.1 Annual Emission Statemen t (AES) Background:

................................................................................... 1

1.2 Electronic Re porting:

.......................................................................................................... ...................... 2
1.2.1 W e b-based Reporting Form s

...................................................................................................... ......... 2
1.2.2 eXtensible M a rkup Language (XM L )

............................................................................................... .. 2

2. Helpful Re sources

.............................................................................................................. ................................ 3

2.1 Check-Lists For Common Errors

.................................................................................................. .......... 3

2.1.1 Facility Info rm ation

........................................................................................................... .................. 3
2.1.2 Sub Facility In form ation

....................................................................................................... ............... 3
2.1.3 Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)

................................................................................................ ........ 3

2.2 AP-42 and FIRE

................................................................................................................. ....................... 4

2.3 Industry-Specific Em ission Factors

............................................................................................. ............ 5

2.4 Standard Industrial Classification and Nort h American Industry Classification System

.................. 5

2.5 Small Business Assistance

.................................................................................................................. 5

3. Instructions For Determining Wh ich Facilities Belong In AIMS/eFACTS For Inventory Purposes

........ 6

3.1 Title V Fa cilitie s

............................................................................................................. ............................ 6

3.2 Non-Title V Facilit ies

......................................................................................................... ........................ 7
3.2.1 Facilities Inventoried for Em i ssion Statem ent Purposes

...................................................................... 7
3.2.2 Facilities Inventoried for Perm it Ca p Com p liance Cer tification

......................................................... 8
3.2.3 Facilities Inventoried for State Im plem entation Planning Purposes

.................................................... 9

4. Commonly Asked Questions Abou t Inventory Reporting

........................................................................... 10

5. Elaboration On Worksheet Co ntents, For A ll Firm-Pl ants

......................................................................... 12

5.1 Throughputs For Each Source

.................................................................................................... ........... 12

5.2 Operating Schedules For Each Source

............................................................................................ ...... 12

5.3 Emission Es timates

............................................................................................................. ..................... 13

5.4 Fuel Analysis

.................................................................................................................. .......................... 13

5.5 Surface Coating (Paint, Glue, Ink) Analysis

.................................................................................... ..... 13

5.6 Control Devices

................................................................................................................ ........................ 13

5.7 Stacks

......................................................................................................................... ............................... 13

5.8 Haz a rdous Air Pollutants

....................................................................................................... ................ 14

5.9 Site Polluta nt Summary

......................................................................................................... ................. 14

6. Confidentiality

................................................................................................................ ................................. 15

7. Certification of Data Accura cy for Emission Statement

.......................................................................... .... 15

8. Extensions Beyond March 1

...................................................................................................... ..................... 15

9. DEP Contact Listings

........................................................................................................... ........................... 16

9.1 Contact Listing, Norristow n - Region I (Southeast)

............................................................................. 16

9.2 Contact Listing, Wilkes-Barre - Region II (Northeast)

........................................................................ 17

DEP Bureau of Air Quality - i - October 2005

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons

9.3 Contact Listing, Harrisburg - Region III (Southcentral)

..................................................................... 18

9.4 Contact Listing, Williamsport - Region IV (Northcentral)

.................................................................. 19

9.5 Contact Listing, Pittsburgh - Region V (Southw e st)

............................................................................ 1 9

9.6 Contact Listing, Meadville - Region VI (Northwest)

............................................................................ 2 0

9.7 Contact Listing, Philadelphi a Air Management Services

.................................................................... 22

9.8 Contact Listing, Allegheny County Health Department

...................................................................... 22

10. Calculation Method Co des For Emissions

......................................................................................... ........... 23

11. Reliability Codes For Emissions

................................................................................................ ..................... 24

12. Abbreviation s/Acronyms

......................................................................................................... ....................... 25

13. Table A: Haz a rdous Air Pollutants (112 [b]) Sorted Alphabetically by Pollutant Name

........................ 26

14. Table B: Haz a rdous Air Pollutants (112 [b]) So rted by Chemical Abstract Service Number

................ 31

15. Table C: Compounds As Listed In 112(b)

........................................................................................ ............ 35

Appendix A WORKSHEET FOR A NEW FACILITY

................................................................................ 36

Appendix B WORKSHEET FOR MISCELLANEOUS SOURCE EMISSIONS

....................................... 38

Appendix C WORKSHEET FOR NEW CO MBUSTION UNITS

............................................................... 39

Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES

................................................................................. 43

Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS

......................................................................... 48

Appendix F WORKSHEET FOR NEW CO NTROL DEVICES

................................................................. 54

Appendix G WORKSHEET FOR NEW STACKS

........................................................................................ 55

Appendix H WORKSHEET FOR NEW FUEL MATERIAL LOCATIONS

.............................................. 56

Appendix I WORKSHEET FOR CHANGES TO EX ISTING STACKS OR CONTROL DEVICES

... 5 8

Appendix J CERTIFICATION OF DATA ACCURACY

.......................................................................... 60

These instructions were prepared by: Carrie E. Eastman Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality, Harrisburg
717-783-5974 ceastman@state.pa.us

Note: This booklet contains the instructions for filling out the Annual Emission Statement. These instructions have been prepared to assist the owner/operators to report their emissions data. These instructions are not regulations. The Department reserves the right to modify
these instructions as needed. Please save this booklet for future reference. If you have questions about the Annual Emission Statement, please contact your Regional Air Quality

s t aff.

This booklet is available electronically via the Internet. Access the DEP Web site at www.depweb.state.pa.us , Keyword: "Emission Inventory."

DEP Bureau of Air Quality Page ii December 2005

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons 

# 1. Background

1.1 Annual Emission Statement (AES) Background:

The Annual Emission Statement (AES) requests information to satisfy several regulatory requirements. These requirements include Title V permitting, the Annual Inventory, and Emission Statements, as well as other regulations that are part of the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Title V regulation is found in the Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 127. The Annual Inventory regulation is found in the Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 135.1-135.5. The Emission Statem ent regulation is found in Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 135.21. The Emission Statement information is due March 1. The Annual Inventory information is due March 1 or within 60 days of the date the facility’s owner/operator is notified by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) that the facility is subjec t to Annual Inventory, whichever is later. DEP has chosen March 1 as the collective deadline to avoi d having to request Emission Statement and Annual Inventory information separately.

When a facility’s owner/operator provides the AES to the appropriate DEP regional office, the information is entered, either automatically or manually depending on the reporting method, into DEP’s computer database. This database is called the Air Information Management Syst em / environment, Facility, Application, Compliance Tracking System (AIMS/eFACTS) . The Regional Air Quality (RAQ) staff review the submission for incorrect or missing data before the data is accepted into AIMS/eFACTS. For a facility that has not been entered in AIMS/eFACTS in previous years, the RAQ staff first creates a map showing the connections between the sub facilities being tracked, the control devices and the stacks. Worksheets for owners/operators of facilities that have never previously reported, or for new sub facilities, are included in these Instructions, and are also available from the DEP website or from RAQ staff. For a facility that has previously been entered, a skeleton consisting of the map and unchanging sub facility information, such as rated capacities, has been copied over from the previous year.

Once the operating schedules, throughputs, and facility emission estimates have been entered, AIMS/eFACTS calculates the emissions using Sub Facility Classification Code (SCC) factors. If the AIMS/eFACTS and facility estimates do not match, the RAQ staff may work with the facility’s owner/operator to determine if corrections are needed. AIMS/eFACTS can contain multiple emission estimates for a specific pollutant from a specific piece of equipment. Acceptable calculation methods include stack tests, Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) data, material balance calculat ions, and industry-specific emission factors, to list some examples. CEM data is usually the most reliable and should be used before any other method.

Some uses for AIMS/eFACTS data include Emissi ons Reductions Credits, Open Market Trading, regulation evaluation, the State Implementation Plan and modeling. A variety of standard and custom reports can be run on AIMS/eFACTS by DEP staff. AIMS/eFACTS data is provided to the federal National Emission Inventory (NEI) database and to other state agencies and the public upon request (See Chapter VI. Confidentiality).

Lab samples are also logged into AIMS/eFACTS and linked to the appropriate plant and sub facility. AIMS/eFACTS also contains permit, emission fee, compliance, stack test and Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) information.

This booklet is available electronically via Internet. Access the DEP Web Site at http://www.depweb.state.pa.us , Keyword: Emission Inventory."

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 1 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 1.2 Electronic Reporting:

Detailed electronic reporting information such as upcoming training (when scheduled) and registration f o r m s a r e a v a i l a b l e f r o m t h e D E P w e b s i t e a t h t t p : / / w w w

. d e p w e b

. s t a t e

. p a

. u s , Keyword: "Emission Inventory." C o n t a c t C a r r i e E a s t m a n a t 7 1 7

- 7 8 3

- 5 9 7 4 o r t h r o u g h e l e c t r o n i c m a i l a t c e a s t m a n @ s t a t e

. p a

. u s to request electronic reporting information, including registration forms to request access to the services.



## 1.2.1 Web-based Reporting Forms

The Bureau of Air Quality’s (BAQ’s) web-based reporting application is called AES*Online

. AES*Online allows a facility’s owner/operator to enter data on an Internet web site through an ordinary web browser. AES*Online users no longer need to fill out paper forms. Facility users log in to a series of secure screens and enter their facility’s inventory data. AES*Online automatically fills in fields where applicable from the previous year’s submission and also checks the data as it is entered to insure accuracy. Additionally, AES*Online includes the ability to add notes to the data and exchange correspondence with RAQ staff. AES*Online provides a unique navigation system to allow t he user to move between screen forms with ease. After the RAQ staff review the submission, entries that need clarification are highlighted by the system so that the facility user can immediately verify the data without having to scroll through unnecessary screens. Data is automatically saved as each screen form is completed to prevent loss of data if the Internet connection is broken.

AES*Online requires Internet access. If your data m anagement system is maintained in spreadsheets or databases, you may want to explore the entirely automated eX tensible Markup Language (X ML) option instead of AES*Online

.



## 1.2.2 eXtensible Markup Language (XML)

X M L provides a common language that allows dissimilar computer systems to share data. X M L surrounds each piece of data with tags, similar to the way a web browser displays a page from the Internet. Software, called a parser, uses these tags to interpret the data. Many different software companies offer parsers, for a variety of prices. An X M L parser is bundled into Windows 2003. X M L uses a Document Type Definition (DTD) to establish the data content and tags for a specific file or document. BAQ has developed a DTD that defines the AES data and tags. A company that wishes to submit X M L data to BAQ must request a copy of the DTD and configure their parser to translate the BAQ DTD. Files in X M L format may be transferred on disk or over
the Internet. The X M L standards and sample files are available for download at http://www.depweb.state.pa.us , Keyword: "Emission Inventory."

Useful links for more information on X M L: http://www.w3.org http://msdn.Microsoft.com/xml/

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 2 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons 

# 2. Helpful Resources

2.1 Check-Lists For Common Errors

Some errors have a way of being repetitious. While the BAQ accepts responsibility for unclear instructions and other systemic errors, please complete this checklist before submitting your AES.

Comments and questions about the contents of the AES can be directed to Mike Rudawski at 717-783- 9 2 4 1 o r m r u d a w s k i @ s t a t e

. p a

. u s

.



## 2.1.1 Facility Information

• Is your tax ID (IRS #) valid?

• Are all the contacts on your forms correct?

• Is BAQ’s map of your sub facilities correct?

• Do you have any sub facilities not included in the map?



## 2.1.2 Sub Facility Information

• Are your units of measure correct? (AIMS/eFACTS aut omatically defaults to the units used last year.)

• Does your SCC match BAQ’s?

• Have you submitted throughput data by month for each sub facility?

• Have you included date effective and date end?

• How about days per week, total days, and total hours?

• If you have manually calc ulated your emissions, have y ou explained how y ou did it? (Please provide as many details as possible.)

• Does the Pollutant Summary page include all emissions?

• Does the summary page compare with the other emissions you have entered?



## 2.1.3 Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)

• Have you speciated your HAPs emissions by sub facility?

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 3 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 2.2 AP-42 and FIRE

AP-42 is a compilation of air pollutant emission factors containing the same factors used for sub Facility Classification Codes (SCCs). AP-42 uses factors for gener al sub facility categories. AP-42 contains a variety of methods for calculating emissions for any given sub facility type. The Bureau of Air Quality currently uses version 6.23 from October 2000. The AP-42 series is available in several media. AP-42 is available free

o n l i n e a t w w w

. e p a

. g o v / t t n / c h i e f / a p 4 2 / i n d e x

. h t m l

The Factor Information REtrieval (FIRE) database contains emission estimation factors for criteria and hazardous air pollutants. FIRE factors are very specific for sub facility type. FIRE offers sub facility specific factors, and does not provide multiple calculation methods ranked by preference. More information about F I R E m a y b e o b t a i n e d a t w w w

. e p a

. g o v / t t n / c h i e f / s o f t w a r e / f i r e / i n d e x

. h t m l

.
Please note: If comparing factors in FIRE against AP-42, the FIRE factors should take precedence because the FIRE version is more recent.

Paper copies of AP-42 may be obtained from the Government Printing Office (GPO) in Washington, DC. Orders must be prepaid (except for other federal agencies or college bookstores). The stock number for the 5th edition of AP-42 (“Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors; Volume I: Stationary Point And Area Sub Facilities”) is S/N 055-000-00500-1. Supplement A is S/N 055-000-00551-6. Supplement B is S/N 055- 000-00565-6. The Government Printing Office can be contacted for current pricing at:

US GPO Superintendent of Documents P.O. Box 371954 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
www.gpo.gov phone 866-512-1800

fax 202-512-2250

Mail orders must include a check or money order made out to the “Superintendent of Documents”.

The Air CHIEF compact disc (CD-ROM), with AP-42 and other hazardous air pollutant emission estimation reports and databases, can be purchased from t he Government Printing Office. The item number is S/N 055-000-00643-1.

For further information on Air CHIEF and other aspects of emission estimation, call U.S. EPA’s Info CHIEF help line at 919-541-1000 during regular office hours, Eastern Time. The CHIEF web page is www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ . EPA does not have the staff or the structure to provide engineering support.

If you have factor needs, new data, questions, or suggestions for U.S. EPA, please send them to this address:

AP-42 Team (MD 14) Emission Factor and Inventory Group Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 4 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 2.3 Industry-Specific Emission Factors

Industry groups have also developed emission factors. You may want to contact your group to obtain any factors that exist.



# 2.4 Standard Industrial Classification and North American Industry Classification System

The U.S. Bureau of Census has replaced its Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system with the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). SICs have been converted to the 2002 version of the NAICS codes in AIMS/eFACTS where possible. In some cases, a conversion was not possible. The NAICS is also required by the IRS, and your financial department may have this information for you.

NAICS information is available from a federal websit e. Copies are available for download or purchase. G o t o h t t p : / / w w w

. c e n s u s

. g o v / e p c d / w w w / n a i c s

. h t m l or the NAICS link on BAQ’s web site at http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/airwaste/aq/emission/Emission_Inventory.htm



# 2.5 Small Business Assistance

The Environmental Management Assistance Program (E MAP) is a program in Pennsylvania designed to help small businesses understand and comply with environmental regulations and identify pollution prevention and energy efficiency opportunities. There are four ways to request assistance from EMAP: Call

r e g u l a t i o n s

. 8 7 7

- a s k

- e m a p

, v i s i t t h e w e b s i t e a t w w w

. a s k e m a p

. o r g

, s e n d a n e m a i l t o q u e s t i o n s @ a s k e m a p

. o r g

o r c o n t a c t y o u r l o c a l S m a l l B u s i n e s s D e v e l o p m e n t C e n t e r ( c h e c k w w w

. p a s b d c

. o r g for the center nearest you). Services such as site visits and permit reviews are confidential and provided at no charge. Business names and addresses will not be released to any regulatory agency.

The DEP Small Business Ombudsman, Jeanne Dworetzky, helps businesses locate sources of funding to install equipment and process changes which result in pollution prevention or energy efficiency. She can also represent small business interests to DEP. Jeanne Dworetzky can be reached at 717-772-5942 or jdworetsky@state.pa.us.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 5 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 3. Instructions For Determining Which Facilities Belong In AIMS/eFACTS For Inventory Purposes

These guidelines are a synthesis of the inventory requirements of Title V, the Annual Inventory, Emission Statements and other regulations that are part of the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Title V regulation is found in the Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 127. The Annual Inventory regulation is found in the Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 135.1-135.5. The Emission Statement regulation is found in Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 135.21. The definition of the term “Title V Facility” can be found in the Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 121.1. Exempt ions from state operating permits can be found at www.depweb.state.pa.us , Keyword: "Air Permits". Search for document number 275-2101-003 Plan Approval and Operating Permit Exemption List (pdf file in t he eLibrary). For information on permitting, contact the Bureau of Air Quality’s Division of Permits at717-787- 717-787-4325.

Owners/operators of facilities that wish to generate or trade Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs) will need to document emissions. The AES is one way to docum ent emissions. All owners/operators of facilities have the option of submitting the AES for ERC purposes. If the facility’s owner/operator does not submit the AES, the facility’s owner/operator should at least maintain sufficient production records to be able to reconstruct emissions for ERC purposes and for audits.

The emissions from any facility that is not required to submit annual inventory forms are captured in the area source inventory, which is calculated using dem ographics and emission factors. For information on area source inventory, contact the Bureau of Air Quality’s Division of Air Information at 717-787-9702.

Any emissions that are below the source reporting thresholds for facilities that are subject to the annual inventory w ill be calculated by BAQ using emission factors. Owners/operators of facilities have the option of submitting emission estimates for emissions below the sub facility thresholds if the facility’s estimate is better than the factor-generated numbers.



# 3.1 Title V Facilities

All owners/operators of Title V facilities must complete the AES. Owners/operators of Title V facilities are subject to the Annual Emission Statement because by definition they exceed the reporting thresholds in the Emission Statement and SIP regulations. Inventory in formation from Title V facilities is used for emission fee purposes and, in combination with other information, to demonstrate compliance. The RAQ staff determine which sub facilities will appear on the AIMS/eFACTS reporting forms. In some cases, the facility’s owner/operator and RAQ staff may agree to treat multiple pieces of related equipment as one sub facility in the Title V permit. The facility’s owner/operator must provide operating schedules and throughputs for all sub facilities on the forms. NOx, SOx, VOC, PM10, PM2.5, ammonia (NH 3 

### ) and CO emissions of 1.0 ton per year or more per sub facility must be reported on a sub facility by sub facility basis. Report to the nearest hundredth (0.00) of a ton.

All HAPs must be reported. HAPs must be reported individually (speciated). Any HAP emissions greater than 0.5 ton per speciated HAP per sub facility per year must be reported on a sub facility by sub facility basis. Report to the nearest hundredth (0.00) of a ton. Sub facility-by-sub facility speciated reporting of HAPs is required for Maximum Achievable Control Tec hnology (MACT) purposes. In cases where HAPs are also VOCs or particulates, do not subtract the HAP em ission estimates from the VOC or particulate emission estimates. The subtraction will be dealt with by BAQ’s AIMS/eFACTS database.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 6 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



### Based upon the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 112 (C) (6), certain pollutants are of special concern. For these HAPs of special concern, owners/operator s of facilities should report any emissions above the following thresholds: Polychlorobiphenols (PCB) 0.01 tons/yr per sub facility Mercury (Hg) 0.01 tons/yr per sub facility Lead (Pb) 0.01 tons/yr per sub facility Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 tons/yr per sub facility
Dioxins 0.00001 tons/yr or 0.02 pounds/yr per sub facility
Furans 0.00001 tons/yr or 0.02 pounds/yr per sub facility

As all HAPs must be reported and as some sub facilities are considered insignificant and not included on the reporting forms, use the “Other Sub Facility” block on the reporting forms to reconcile the facility totals with individual sub facility estimates.



# 3.2 Non-Title V Facilities

Owners/operators of Non-Title V facilities may be required to complete the AES for several reasons: the Emission Statement regulation, permit cap compliance certification and State Implementation Plan (SIP) purposes. DEP may also request inventory information fr om any facility, per the Pennsylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 135. The Emission Statement, permit caps and SIP are discussed in paragraphs 1-3 below.



## 3.2.1 Facilities Inventoried for Emission Statement Purposes

The Emission Statement regulation is found in Penns ylvania Code, Title 25, Chapter 135.21. Owners or operators of facilities that are located in Bucks, C hester, Delaware, or Montgomery Counties that emits or have a potential to emit 25 tons or more per year of VOC or 25 tons or more per year of 

## NO x 

### are required owner/operator to report. Owners or operators of facilities located in the remainder of the Commonwealth that emits or has a potential to emit 50 tons or more per year of VOC or 100 tons or more per year of 

## NO x 

### mus t complete the AES. Facilities that emit less than 25 tons per y ear of either oxides of nitrogen or VOC and that are on the exemption list in Section 3.2.1.1 of this document do not have to complete the AES.

Ow ners or operators of facilities located in Allegheny or Philadelphia Counties should contact the county agency listed in Sections 9.7 and 9.8 for reporting instructions.

Owners/operators of Non-Title V facilities subject to the Emission Statement regulation must report throughputs and operating schedules for all sub facilities in AIMS/eFACTS. In addition, these owners/operators of facilities must report VOC and NOx actual emissions of 1.0 TPY or more per sub facility. Emissions less than 1.0 ton per year do not have to be reported. Report to the nearest hundredth (0.00) of a ton. All emissions must be reported sub facility by sub facility, not as facility totals. The emission estimates for other pollutants will be calculated by Air Quality’s AIMS/eFACTS database using emission factors. The facility’s owner/operator has the option of reporting emission estimates for other pollutants if the facility’s owner/operator’s estimates are better than the factor-based calculations. These facilities may also be required to report HAPs. Please refer to Section 3.1 of this document.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 7 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



## 3.2.1.1. Emission St atement Exemptions

The following list of exemptions was published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 23, Number 17, pages 1994-95 on April 24, 1993:

• Non-Industrial Surface Coating: 3⁄4 Architectural 3⁄4 Automotive Refinishing

• Other Solvent Use 3⁄4 Electronics and Electrical Degreasing 3⁄4 Other Manufacturing Degreasing 3⁄4 Automotive Repair Cold Cleaning Degreasing 3⁄4 Manufacturing Cold Cleaning Degreasing 3⁄4 Dry cleaning 3⁄4 Graphic Arts

• Surface Coatings 3⁄4 Flatwood Products 3⁄4 Furniture & Fixtures 3⁄4 Electrical Insulation 3⁄4 Metal Cans 3⁄4 Miscellaneous Finished Products 3⁄4 Machinery & Equipment 3⁄4 Appliances 3⁄4 New Motor Vehicles 3⁄4 Marine 3⁄4 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 3⁄4 Maintenance 3⁄4 Other Special Coatings

• Waste Management Practices 3⁄4 Publicly-Owned Treatment Works 3⁄4 Landfills 3⁄4 Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities

• Small Stationary Fossil Fuels* 3⁄4 Fuel Oil Combustion 3⁄4 Coal Combustion 3⁄4 Gas Combustion

• Miscellaneous Sub Facilities 3⁄4 On-Site Incineration (does not include open burning) 3⁄4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks

*The sizes of sm all stationary fossil fuel sources are defined by Chapter 127.14, Perm it Exem ptions.



## 3.2.2 Facilities Inventoried for Permit Cap Compliance Certification

Some owners/operators of facilities have taken permit restrictions in order to avoid major status and a federally enforceable permit. Also, a facility may have a sub facility cap for other reasons. The method of demonstrating cap compliance is addressed in the permit. The AES may be used to demonstrate cap compliance.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 8 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



## 3.2.3 Facilities Inventoried for St ate Implementation Planning Purposes

Owners/operators of synthetic minor facilities are subject to the inventory and must complete the AIMS/eFACTS reporting forms if actual VOC emissions are greater than or equal to 10 TPY for the facility. This VOC threshold was established to meet EPA’s ozone planning requirements. The facility’s owner/operator must report annually. Owners/operators of synthetic minor facilities subject to the inventory must report throughputs and operating schedules for all sub facilities on the AIMS/eFACTS reporting forms. In addition, these owners/operators of facilities must report VOC actual emissions as a facility total. Report to the nearest hundredth of a ton. The emission estimates for other pollutants will be calculated by Air Quality’s AIMS/eFACTS database using emission factors. The facility’s owner/operator has the option of reportingemission estimates for other pollutants if the facility’s owner/operator’s estimates are better than the factorbased calculations.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 9 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 4. Commonly Asked Questions About Inventory Reporting

Nitrogen oxide (NO) is listed on the Title V pollutant list. Fees are paid for nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are reported for inventory but are actually NO2. Should the Title V NO be reported as NO, as NO2, or as NOx?

Report NO
x 

### as NO 2



### .

If a facility ’ s ow ner/operator has completed some emission estimates incorrectly before receiving these instructions, does the facility ’ s ow ner/operator need to go back and fix them? If so, w hen?

Yes. Incorrectly com p leted facility em ission estim a tes should be corrected as soon as possible by notifying the RAQ staff.

Which sub facilities must be tracked and reported for inventory ?

Owners/operators of facilities are responsible for reporting on any sub facilities identified by RAQ staff. If a sub facility does not appear on the preprinted form s or web site, the sub facility is not autom atically

exem pted from reporting. For the purposes of Title V fees, owners/operators of facilities m u st provide em ission estim a tes and pay fees on all sub facilities covered by the regulations, whether or not the sub facilities appear on the AES. Any owners/operators of facilities that are applying for synthetic m i nor status m u st docum ent all

param eters that they agree to cap in their application. These caps are in place from the tim e the synthetic

m i nor application was subm itted. Therefore, any facility’ s owner/operator that has applied for a synthetic m i nor
perm i t and has agreed to cap production m u st docum ent com p liance with the caps. The AES is one m e thod of
docum enting com p liance. Please contact your RAQ staff for m o re inform ation on docum enting com p liance. Blank reporting form s for sub facilities not currently in AIMS/eFACTS are included in this Instruction booklet, and m a y also be downloaded from the DEP web site or obtained from RAQ staff.

If a sub facility is missing from the AES, did the facility ’ s ow ner/operator have to report any HAPs, including fugitives, emitted from the missing sub facilities?

If applicable requirem ents (such as BAT) exist for the sub facility, the sub facility m u st be added to AIMS/eFACTS so that sub facility-specific HAPS can be reported. If applicable requirem ents do not exist, the facility’ s owner/operator m u st report all HAPS but can report the HAPs as speciated facility totals.

Please clarify the current and future policies on aggregating small, similar sub facilities.

Any aggregation of sm all sim ilar sub facilities will have to be done via the perm i t. Please contact your RAQ staff to discuss aggregating sub facilities.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 10 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



### If a facility w as in the 2002 baseline inventory w i th significant emissions, but has now changed processes so that the facility is not subject to the AES under the current guidance, w hat should the facility ’ s ow ner/operator do?

The facility’ s owner/operator will not have to report the AES. The facility will not be deleted from the AIMS/eFACTS database because DEP needs to m a intain all em ission inform ation from previous years in case the facility generates Em ission Reduction Credits (ERCs). Also, deletion would cause the facility to disappear from the baseline inventory. The facility will be left in the AIMS/eFACTS database and m a rked as not subject to the AES. EPA has adopted new National Am bient Air Quality Standards for ozone and fine particulates. The
EPA im plem entation rules for these pollutants establish 2002 as the new baseline inventory year. Facility owners/operators should review their 2002 inventory to determ i ne whether they should report. Please contact RAQ staff if you need to be added to the 2002 inventory.

What version of the Source Classification Codes (SCCs) should be used?

Use version 6.23 from October 2000. Inform ation can be found at www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/software/fire/index.htm l

.

Will DEP request inventory information for previous operating y ears from companies that have been operating since 1990 but have not reported previously ?

Yes, these com panies will need to be added to the 1990 baseline inventory and other periodic inventories. The RAQ staff will notify the com panies of the inform ation needed.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 11 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 5. Elaboration On Worksheet Contents, For All Firm-Plants

5.1 Throughputs For Each Source

Throughputs must be tracked and reported in monthly increments for each sub facility. If an operating schedule changes during a month, y ou must provide a throughput for each operating schedule in effect that month . Monthly throughputs are required to accommodate various data reports generated from AIMS/eFACTS, such as quarterly reporting with a December start date, or quarterly percentages.

Note: If there is not enough space provided on the preprinted forms to submit all operating schedules and throughputs and/or new SCCs, use the form WORKSHEET FOR ADDITIONAL OPERATING SCHEDULES FOR EXISTING SUB FACILITY/SCCs, OR ADDITIONAL SUB FACILITY/SCCs FOR EX ISTING SUB FACILITIES.



# 5.2 Operating Schedules For Each Source

DEP recognizes that owners/operators of facilities may change operating schedules during the year. Owners/operators of primary facilities must provide at least one operating schedule for each sub facility. Owners/operators of primary facilities may provide multiple operating schedules per sub facility if an operating schedule changes significantly during the year. Exam ples of significant changes could be a piece of equipment shut down for more than two weeks or a change from 1 shift to 2 or 3 (and vice versa). Consult with RAQ staff for guidance. Keep in mind that worst-case production numbers will yield worst-case emissions numbers when emissions are calculated in AIMS/eFACTS using SCCs.

For each sub facility operating schedule, the facility’s owner/operator must provide:

1. Start date of the operating schedule, 2. End date of the operating schedule.



## Additionally, for each operating schedule 2 of the following 3 must be provided:

1. Total hours the sub facility operated during that particular operating schedule, 2. Total days the sub facility operated during that particular operating schedule, and 3. Average days per week the sub facility operated during that particular operating schedule.

If you are trying to report a shutdown period for a sub facility, you end the current operating schedule when the shutdown occurs and start a new operating schedul e when the shutdown is over. For example, if your plant were shut down from Ju ly 1 to July 15, you would have:

Operating schedule 1: Date effective = January 1 Date end = June 30 Operating schedule 2: Date effective = July 16 Date end = December 31

Note: If there is not enough space provided on the preprinted form s to subm it all operating schedules and throughputs and/or new SCCs, contact your DEP regional office.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 12 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 5.3 Emission Estimates

Owners/operators of facilities must provide an estimate of the tons of NOx, VOC, PM10, PM2.5, SO X 

### , NH 3 

### and CO emitted per year for each sub facility within the plant. See Section 5.8 of this document for HAP reporting.

Owners/operators of facilities must also indicate the method used to calculate the emissions. Calculation Method Codes are listed in the back of the instructions. Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) data is the most reliable for emission estimates and should be used when available.



# 5.4 Fuel Analysis

Percent sulfur, percent ash and Btu content must be reported for all fuels. Report zeros where appropriate. Check with the DEP contact for your county or your RAQ staff to determine the analytical results that must be reported.



# 5.5 Surface Coating (Paint, Glue, Ink) Analysis

Percent water, coating density, and total volatile content must be reported for all water- and solventbased coatings used. If possible, include a list of all coatings and their associated analyses with your submission. Some DEP regions provide VOC worksheets to aid reporting. Contact your RAQ staff for the preferred reporting format.



# 5.6 Control Devices

The owners/operators of new facilities and previously unreported sub facilities must report control efficiencies for every pollutant controlled by a control device. These pollutants may include VOCS, NO X 

### , SO X 

### , CO, PM 10, PM2.5 and NH 3 

### . If the primary control system does not capture 100 percent of the sub facility emissions, both a fugitive emission point and a regular stack should be reported. Capture and control are not the same. A device may control 90 percent of the captured VOCs but capture only 80 percent of the VOCs generated by the sub facility.

If your facility’s owner/operator is planning to add, m odify, or remove control devices, your RAQ staff should be notified prior to the change.



# 5.7 Stacks

The owners/operators of new facilities and previously unreported sub facilities must report stack inside diameter, height, exhaust flow in ACFM, exhaust velocity in meters or feet per second, exhaust temperature, exhaust percent moisture and the direction of stack discharge. Stack information is requested on all forms except the WORKSHEET FOR A NEW FIRM-PLANT and the WORKSHEET FOR NEW FUEL MATERIAL LOCATIONS.

Note: If your facility’s owner/operator is planning to add, modify, or remove stacks, your DEP inspector should be notified prior to the change and the form WORKSHEET FOR NEW STACKS or the WORKSHEET FOR CHANGES TO EX ISTING CONTROL DEVICES OR STACKS FOR EX ISTING SUB FACILITYS should be submitted.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 13 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 5.8 Hazardous Air Pollutants

Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) estimates are required for certain plants. Please refer to Chapter III. Guidance For Determining Which Facilities Belong in AIMS/eFACTS For Inventory Purposes for more information. All HAPs that must be reported are listed in Chapters X II to X V I. A calculation method is required with the HAP estimates. Refer to Chapter X I., Calculation Method Codes For Emissions. Additional information can be found in the Pennsylvania Code, Chapter 121.1 under "Title V regulated air pollutants". You must use the reporting form provided in the Appendix or with your preprinted input forms.

There are de m i nim u s levels for HAP reporting. If the total HAP emissions from a facility are less than one (1) ton per year per HAP, the facility’s owner/operator is not required to report Haps. However, if the facility has over one (1) ton per year of any HAP that Hap needs to be reported for each sub facility that emits that specific HAP. For example, a facility has 1.5 t ons per year of benzene emissions from three sub facilities and 0.75 tons per year of toluene emissions. The three sub facilities emit 1 ton, 950 pounds and 50 pounds of toluene respectively. The facility’s owner/operator must report the three sources of benzene

All HAPs must be reported. HAPs must be reported individually (speciated). Any HAP emissions greater than 0.5 ton per speciated HAP per sub facility per year must be reported on a sub facility by sub facility basis. Report to the nearest hundredth of a ton. Sub facility by sub facility speciated reporting of HAPs is required for Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) purposes.

In some cases HAPs are also VOCs or particulates, such as trichloroethylene. Do not subtract the HAP emission estimates from the VOC or particulate em ission estimates. The subtraction will be dealt with by Air Quality’s AIMS/eFACTS database.

Based upon the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 112 (C) (6), certain pollutants are of special concern.

For these HAPs of special concern, owners/operat ors of facilities should report any emissions above the following thresholds: Polychlorobiphenols (PCB) 0.01 TPY per sub facility Mercury (Hg) 0.01 TPY per sub facility Lead (Pb) 0.01 TPY per sub facility Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 TPY per sub facility
Dioxins 0.00001 TPY per sub facility
Furans 0.00001 TPY per sub facility

As all HAPs must be reported and as some sub facilities are considered insignificant and not included on the reporting forms, use the “Other Sub Facility” block on the reporting forms to reconcile the facility totals with individual sub facility estimates.



# 5.9 Site Pollutant Summary

The form summarizes the annual emissions of NO X 

### , SO X 

### , VOC, PM10, PM 2.5, NH 3 

### and CO for the facility. You must use the reporting form provided in the Appendix or with your preprinted input forms.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 14 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons 

# 6. Confidentiality

Confidential status must be requested in a letter to the DEP regional office annually

. The letter must specify the sub facilities and information that are affected, and the reasons for needing confidentiality. Confidentiality is discussed in Section 13.2 of the Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act. Only throughputs and operating schedules can be treated as confidential in AIMS/eFACTS. Confidential throughputs and operating schedules are not provided in basic reports requested by the public and agencies other than EPA. Confidential throughputs and operating schedules are not provided to EPA.



# 7. Certification of Data Accuracy for Emission Statement

This form must be completed annually by the owners/operators of facilities that are subject to the Emission Statement regulation. You must use the form provided in the Appendix or with your preprinted input forms. If you are using the form in the Appendix, make sure to fill in your Primary Facility ID (assigned by DEP) in the space at the top of the form.



# 8. Extensions Beyond March 1

As per 25 Pa. Code Section 135.3(c) a facility’s owner/operator may request an extension of time from the Department for the filing of the annual emission inv entory, and the Department may grant the extension for reasonable cause. Extension requests should be made in writing to the RAQ contact listed in these Instructions. Include the reason for the request and the expected date by which the inventory report will be submitted.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 15 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 9. DEP Contact Listings

Please return the completed forms to the appropriate RAQ representative from the follow i ng contact listing. If y ou have questions about the forms, please call y our RAQ representative.



# 9.1 Contact Listing, Norristown - Region I (Southeast)

Contact County

James Rebarchak Southeast Regional Office 2 East Main Street Norristown, PA 19401 (484) 250-7503 Montgomery County

Kevin McLemore Southeast Regional Office 2 East Main Street Norristown, PA 19401 (484) 250-7502250-5900 Chester County Delaware County

Kevin McLemore Southeast Regional Office 2 East Main Street Norristown, PA 19401 (484) 250-7502 Chester County Delaware County

Shawn Mountain Southeast Regional Office 2 East Main Street Norristown, PA 19401 (484) 250-7504 Bucks County

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 16 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 9.2 Contact Listing, Wilkes-Barre - Region II (Northeast)

Contact County

Roger Bellas Northeast Regional Office Two Public Square Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711-0790 (570) 826-2464 Lackawanna County Luzerne County Pike County Monroe County (except:

Schuylkill County Susquehanna County Wayne County Wyoming County Stroudsburg East Stroudsburg Stroud Ross Hamilton Township)

Peter DiSabella Northeast Regional Office Two Public Square Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711-0790 (610) 826-2345 Lehigh County Northampton County Monroe County (partial): Stroudsburg East Stroudsburg Hamilton Township Ross Stroud

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 17 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 9.3 Contact Listing, Harrisburg - Region III (Southcentral)

Contact County

Frederick Heagy Southcentral Regional Office 909 Elmerton Ave. Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 705-4886 Cumberland County Dauphin County Lebanon County Perry County

Susan Foster York District Office 150 Roosevelt Avenue, Suite 200 York, PA 17401-3381 (717) 771-4481 Adams County Franklin County York County

Dave Bonga Lancaster District Office 1661 Old Philadelphia Pike Lancaster, PA 17602 (717) 390-2360 Berks County Lancaster County

Richard Roller Altoona District 3001 Fairway Drive Altoona, PA 16602 (814) 946-7294 Bedford County Blair County Fulton County Juniata County Huntington County Mifflin County

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 18 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 9.4 Contact Listing, Williamsport - Region IV (Northcentral)

Contact County

Muhammad Zaman Northcentral Regional Office 208 West Third Street Suite 101 Williamsport, PA 17701 (570) 327-0512 Bradford County Cameron County Centre County Clearfield County Clinton County Columbia County Lycoming County Montour County Northumberland County Potter County Snyder County Sullivan County Tioga County Union County



# 9.5 Contact Listing, Pittsburgh - Region V (Southwest)

Contact County

Keith Gratzmiller Pittsburgh Regional Office 400 Waterfront Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4745 (412) 442-4000 Armstrong County Beaver County Greene County Washington County

Dan Haney Greensburg District Office RR2, Box 603-C, Route 819S Greensburg, PA 15601-9802 (724) 925-5415 Cambria County Fayette County Indiana County Somerset County Westmoreland County

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 19 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 9.6 Contact Listing, M eadville - Region VI (Northwest)

Contact County Tow nship/Borough

Staci Gustafson Northwest Regional Office 230 Chestnut Street Meadville, PA 16335-3481 (814) 332-6940 Crawford County Erie County Mercer County (partial): Deer Creek Township Delaware Township Fairview Township Fredonia Borough French Creek Township Greene Township Greenville Borough Hempfield Township Jamestown Borough Lake Township Mill Creek Township New Lebanon Borough New Vernon Township Otter Creek Township Perry Township Pymatuning Township Salem Township Sandy Creek Township Sandy Lake Borough Sandy Lake Township Sheakleyville Borough Stoneboro Borough Sugar Grove Township West Salem Township

Venango County (partial): Canal Township Cooperstown Borough French Creek Township Jackson Township Oakland Township Plum Township Sugarcreek Borough Utica Borough

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 20 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons


# 9.6 Contact Listing, Meadville - Region VI (Northwest) (continued)

Contact County Tow nship/Borough

Lori McNabb 121 North Mill Street New Castle, PA 16101 Butler County Lawrence County Mercer County (partial): Clark Boro Coolspring Township
East Lackawannock Township
Farrell Findley Township Grove City Borough Hermitage Hickory Township Jackson Center Jackson Township Jefferson Township Lackawannock Township Liberty Township
Merc er Pine Township Sharon Sharpsville Borough Shenango Township South Pymatuning Township Springfield Township West Middlesex Borough Wheatland Borough Wilmington Township Wolf Creek Township Worth Township

Venango County (partial): Barkeyville Borough Clinton Township Clintonville Borough Emlenton Borough Franklin Borough Irwin Township Mineral Township Polk Sandycreek Township Scrubgrass Township Victory Township

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 21 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons


# 9.6 Contact Listing, Meadville - Region VI (Northwest) (continued)

Contact County Tow nship/Borough

David Bubbenmoyer Northwest Regional Office 230 Chestnut Street, Meadville, PA 16335 (814) 723-3273 Clarion County Elk County Forest County Jefferson County McKean County Warren County Venango County (partial): Allegheny Township Cherrytree Township Cornplanter Township Cranberry Township Oil City Oil Creek Township Pinegrove Township Pleasantville Borough President Township Richland Township Rockland Township Rouseville Borough



# 9.7 Contact Listing, Philadelphia Air M a nagement Services

Contact

Assistant Director of Engineering Department of Public Health Air Management Services 321 University Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19104 (215) 875-5678



# 9.8 Contact Listing, Allegheny County Health Department

Contact

Allegheny County Health Department Bureau of Air Pollution Control 301 39th Street Pittsburgh, PA 15201 (412) 578-8133

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 22 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 10. Calculation Method Codes For Emissions

These codes are assigned by the facility’s owner/operator and describe the method used to calculate the emission estimates. Codes 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 are assigned within AIMS/eFACTS and should not be assigned by the facility’s owner/operator.

CODE AIMS DESCRIPTION

1 DEP Stack Test

2 Company Stack Test Approved by DEP

3 Other Company Test Approved by DEP

9 S e e C o m m e n t

10 Company SCC Factor

11 Company Material Balance

12 Company Efficiency of Control Device

13 Company VOC Calculation

14 Continuous Emission Monitoring

1 5 A P

- 4 2

16 Company-Calculated Site Emission

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 23 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 11. Reliability Codes For Emissions

Reliability codes are assigned by the RAQ staff or AIMS/eFACTS. The codes are provided in the instructions for informational purposes only . The following list is arranged in order of most reliable method of calculation to least reliable. Codes A, B, C, D, E and U are assigned by AIMS/eFACTS and describe the reliability of the SCC used.

C O D E DESCRIPTION

CEM

BST

ST

DVC

CVC

MMB

ME

RE

EMB

COM

A

B

C

D

E

SITE

U

NA Continuous Emission Monitoring

Best Stack Test

Stack Test

DEP VOC Calculation

Company VOC Calculation

Measured Material Balance

Measured Efficiency

Rated Efficiency

Estimated Material Balance

See Comment

A Rated Factor

B Rated Factor

C Rated Factor

D Rated Factor

E Rated Factor

Site-Level Manual Emission

U Unrated Factor

N/A For Plant Total

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 24 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 12. Abbreviations/Acronyms

Abbreviation/Acrony m Definition

ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute

A C T A c t u a l

AIMS Air Information Management System (BAQ’s database module of eFACTS)

AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System (EPA’s database)
BAQ Bureau of Air Quality

BTU British thermal units

CAS Chemical abstract service

C D Control d e v i c e C O Carbon m o n o x i d e C U Combustion u n i t

DEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

eFACTS environment, Facility, Application, Compliance Tracking System

EHS Extremely Hazardous Substance

EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

FML Fuel material location

FUEL MAT LOC Fuel material location

H g M e r c u r y
I N I n c i n e r a t o r
I N C I n c i n e r a t o r MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology

M B T U Thousand B t u
M M B T U Million B t u

NAICS North American Industrial Classification System

N O x Nitrogen o x i d e s

P b L e a d

P C B P o l y c h l o r o b i p h e n o l s
P 0 0 0 General p a r t i c u l a t e
PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter

PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter

POM Polycyclic Organic Matter

P R P r o c e s s
PTE RAQ Potential to Emit Regional Air Quality

SCC Sub Facility Classification Code

SCFM Standard cubic feet per minute

SIC Standard Industrial Classification

S O x Sulfur o x i d e s
TPY Tons per Year

VOC Volatile organic compounds

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 25 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 13. Table A: Hazardous Air Pollutants (112 [b]) Sorted Alphabetically by Pollutant Name

CAS POLLUTANT ( A l

phabet i c al By Pol l u t ant N

a me)

7 5 0 7 0 A c e t a l d e h y d e

6 0 3 5 5 A c e t a m i d e

7 5 0 5 8 A c e t o n i t r i l e

9 8 8 6 2 A c e t o p h e n o n e

5 3 9 6 3 2

- A c e t y l a m i n o f l u o r e n e

1 0 7 0 2 8 A c r o l e i n

7 9 0 6 1 A c r y l a m i d e

7 9 1 0 7 A c r y l i c a c i d

1 0 7 1 3 1 A c r y l o n i t r i l e

1 0 7 0 5 1 A l l y l c h l o r i d e

9 2 6 7 1 4

- A m i n o b i p h e n y l

6 2 5 3 3 A n i l i n e

9 0 0 4 0 o

- A n i s i d i n e

1 3 3 2 2 1 4 A s b e s t o s

71432 Benzene (including Benzene from gasoline)

9 2 8 7 5 B e n z i d i n e

9 8 0 7 7 B e n z o t r i c h l o r i d e

1 0 0 4 4 7 B e n z y l c h l o r i d e

9 2 5 2 4 B i p h e n y l

1 1 7 8 1 7 B i s ( 2

- e t h y l h e x y l ) p h t h a l a t e ( D E H P )

5 4 2 8 8 1 B i s ( c h l o r o m e t h y l ) e t h e r

7 5 2 5 2 B r o m o f o r m

1 0 6 9 9 0 1

, 3

- B u t a d i e n e

1 5 6 6 2 7 C a l c i u m c y a n a m i d e

1 3 3 0 6 2 C a p t a n

6 3 2 5 2 C a r b a r y l

7 5 1 5 0 C a r b o n d i s u l f i d e

5 6 2 3 5 C a r b o n t e t r a c h l o r i d e

4 6 3 5 8 1 C a r b o n y l s u l f i d e

1 2 0 8 0 9 C a t e c h o l

1 3 3 9 0 4 C h l o r a m b e n

5 7 7 4 9 C h l o r d a n e

7 7 8 2 5 0 5 C h l o r i n e

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 26 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons

CAS POLLUTANT ( A l

phabet i c al By Pol l u t ant N

a me)

7 9 1 1 8 C h l o r o a c e t i c a c i d

5 3 2 2 7 4 2

- C h l o r o a c e t o p h e n o n e

1 0 8 9 0 7 C h l o r o b e n z e n e

5 1 0 1 5 6 C h l o r o b e n z i l a t e

6 7 6 6 3 C h l o r o f o r m

107302 Chloromethyl methyl ether

1 2 6 9 9 8 C h l o r o p r e n e ( 2

- c h l o r o

- 1

, 3

- b u t a d i e n e )

1319773 Cresols/Cresylic acid (isomers and mixture)

9 5 4 8 7 o

- C r e s o l

1 0 8 3 9 4 m

- C r e s o l

1 0 6 4 4 5 p

- C r e s o l

9 8 8 2 8 C u m e n e ( I s o p r o p y l b e n z e n e )

94757 2,4-D, salts,esters (Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)

7 2 5 5 9 D D E ( p

, p

- D i c h l o r o d i p h e n y l d i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e )

3 3 4 8 8 3 D i a z o m e t h a n e

1 3 2 6 4 9 D i b e n z o f u r a n s

9 6 1 2 8 1

, 2

- D i b r o m o

- 3

- c h l o r o p r o p a n e

8 4 7 4 2 D i b u t y l p h t h a l a t e

1 0 6 4 6 7 1

, 4

- D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e

9 1 9 4 1 3

, 3

- D i c h l o r o b e n z i d i n e

111444 Dichloroethyl ether (B is(2 chloroethyl)ether)

5 4 2 7 5 6 1

, 3

- D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e ( m i x t u r e )

6 2 7 3 7 D i c h l o r v o s

1 1 1 4 2 2 D i e t h a n o l a m i n e

1 2 1 6 9 7 N

, N

- D i m e t h y l a n i l i n e

6 4 6 7 5 D i e t h y l s u l f a t e

1 1 9 9 0 4 3

, 3

- D i m e t h o x y b e n z i d i n e

6 0 1 1 7 D i m e t h y l a m i n o a z o b e n z e n e

1 1 9 9 3 7 3

, 3

- D i m e t h y l b e n z i d i n e

79447 Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride

6 8 1 2 2 D i m e t h y l f o r m a m i d e

5 7 1 4 7 1

, 1

- D i m e t h y l h y d r a z i n e

1 3 1 1 1 3 D i m e t h y l p h t h a l a t e

7 7 7 8 1 D i m e t h y l s u l f a t e

534521 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, and salts

5 1 2 8 5 2

, 4

- D i n i t r o p h e n o l

1 2 1 1 4 2 2

, 4

- D i n i t r o t o l u e n e

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 27 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons

CAS POLLUTANT ( A l

phabet i c al By Pol l u t ant N

a me)

1 2 3 9 1 1 1

, 4

- D i o x a n e ( 1

, 4

- D i e t h y l e n e o x i d e )

1 2 2 6 6 7 1

, 2

- D i p h e n y l h y d r a z i n e

1 0 6 8 9 8 E p i c h l o r o h y d r i n ( 1

- c h l o r o

- 2

, 3

- e p o x y p r o p a n e )

106887 1,2-Epoxybutane (1,2-Butylene oxide)

1 4 0 8 8 5 E t h y l a c r y l a t e

1 0 0 4 1 4 E t h y l b e n z e n e

51796 Ethyl carbamate (Urethane)

75003 Ethyl chloride (Chloroethane)

106934 Ethylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)

107062 Ethylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloroethane)

1 0 7 2 1 1 E t h y l e n e g l y c o l

151564 Ethylene imine (Aziridine)

7 5 2 1 8 E t h y l e n e o x i d e

9 6 4 5 7 E t h y l e n e t h i o u r e a

75343 Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-Dichloroethane)

5 0 0 0 0 F o r m a l d e h y d e

7 6 4 4 8 H e p t a c h l o r

1 1 8 7 4 1 H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e

8 7 6 8 3 H e x a c h l o r o b u t a d i e n e

7 7 4 7 4 H e x a c h l o r o c y c l o p e n t a d i e n e

6 7 7 2 1 H e x a c h l o r o e t h a n e

8 2 2 0 6 0 H e x a m e t h y l e n e 1

, 6

- d i i s o c y a n a t e

6 8 0 3 1 9 H e x a m e t h y l p h o s p h o r a m i d e

1 1 0 5 4 3 H e x a n e

3 0 2 0 1 2 H y d r a z i n e

7 6 4 7 0 1 0 H y d r o c h l o r i c a c i d

7664393 Hydrogen fluoride (Hydrofluoric acid)

1 2 3 3 1 9 H y d r o q u i n o n e

7 8 5 9 1 I s o p h o r o n e

58899 Lindane (gamma hexachlorocyclohexane) (all isomers)

1 0 8 3 1 6 M a l e i c a n h y d r i d e

6 7 5 6 1 M e t h a n o l

7 2 4 3 5 M e t h o x y c h l o r

74839 Methyl bromide (Bromomethane)

74873 Methyl chloride (Chloromethane)

71556 Methyl chloroform (1,1,1-Trichloroethane)

78933 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone)

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 28 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons

CAS POLLUTANT ( A l

phabet i c al By Pol l u t ant N

a me)

6 0 3 4 4 M e t h y l h y d r a z i n e

74884 Methyl iodide (Iodomethane)

108101 Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) (Hexone)

6 2 4 8 3 9 M e t h y l i s o c y a n a t e

8 0 6 2 6 M e t h y l m e t h a c r y l a t e

1634044 Methyl tert butyl ether

1 0 1 1 4 4 4

, 4

- M e t h y l e n e

- b i s ( 2

- c h l o r o a n i l i n e )

75092 Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)

101688 Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI)

1 0 1 7 7 9 4

, 4

- M e t h y l e n e d i a n i l i n e

9 1 2 0 3 N a p h t h a l e n e

9 8 9 5 3 N i t r o b e n z e n e

9 2 9 3 3 4

- N i t r o b i p h e n y l

1 0 0 0 2 7 4

- N i t r o p h e n o l

7 9 4 6 9 2

- N i t r o p r o p a n e

6 8 4 9 3 5 N

- N i t r o s o

- N

- m e t h y l u r e a

6 2 7 5 9 N

- N i t r o s o d i m e t h y l a m i n e

5 9 8 9 2 N

- N i t r o s o m o r p h o l i n e

5 6 3 8 2 P a r a t h i o n

8 2 6 8 8 P e n t a c h l o r o n i t r o b e n z e n e ( Q u i n t o b e n z e n e )

8 7 8 6 5 P e n t a c h l o r o p h e n o l

1 0 8 9 5 2 P h e n o l

1 0 6 5 0 3 p

- P h e n y l e n e d i a m i n e

7 5 4 4 5 P h o s g e n e

7 8 0 3 5 1 2 P h o s p h i n e

7 7 2 3 1 4 0 P h o s p h o r u s

8 5 4 4 9 P h t h a l i c a n h y d r i d e

1 3 3 6 3 6 3 P o l y c h l o r i n a t e d biphenyls (PCB's) (Aroclors)

1 1 2 0 7 1 4 1

, 3

- P r o p a n e s u l t o n e

5 7 5 7 8 b e t a P r o p i o l a c t o n e

1 2 3 3 8 6 P r o p i o n a l d e h y d e

1 1 4 2 6 1 P r o p o x u r ( B a y g o n )

78875 Propylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloropropane)

7 5 5 6 9 P r o p y l e n e o x i d e

75558 1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl aziridine)

9 1 2 2 5 Q u i n o l i n e

1 0 6 5 1 4 Q u i n o n e ( 1

, 4

- b e n z o q u i n o n e )

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 29 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons

CAS POLLUTANT ( A l

phabet i c al By Pol l u t ant N

a me)

1 0 0 4 2 5 S t y r e n e

9 6 0 9 3 S t y r e n e o x i d e

1746016 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo p dioxin

7 9 3 4 5 1

, 1

, 2

, 2

- T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 2 7 1 8 4 T e t r a c h l o r o e t h y l e n e ( P e r c h l o r o e t h y l e n e )

7 5 5 0 4 5 0 T i t a n i u m t e t r a c h l o r i d e

1 0 8 8 8 3 T o l u e n e

9 5 8 0 7 2

, 4

- T o l u e n e d i a m i n e

5 8 4 8 4 9 2

, 4

- T o l u e n e d i i s o c y a n a t e

9 5 5 3 4 o

- T o l u i d i n e

8001352 Toxaphene (chlorinated camphene)

1 2 0 8 2 1 1

, 2

, 4

- T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e

7 9 0 0 5 1

, 1

, 2

- T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

7 9 0 1 6 T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

9 5 9 5 4 2

, 4

, 5

- T r i c h l o r o p h e n o l

8 8 0 6 2 2

, 4

, 6

- T r i c h l o r o p h e n o l

1 2 1 4 4 8 T r i e t h y l a m i n e

1 5 8 2 0 9 8 T r i f l u r a l i n

5 4 0 8 4 1 2

, 2

, 4

- T r i m e t h y l p e n t a n e

1 0 8 0 5 4 V i n y l a c e t a t e

593602 Vinyl bromide (bromoethene)

7 5 0 1 4 V i n y l c h l o r i d e

75354 Vinylidene chloride (1,1-Dichloroethylene)

1330207 Xylenes (isomers and mixture)

9 5 4 7 6 o

- X y l e n e s

1 0 8 3 8 3 m

- X y l e n e s

1 0 6 4 2 3 p

- X y l e n e s

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 30 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 14. Table B: Hazardous Air Pollutants (112 [b]) Sorted by Chemical Abstract Service Number

CAS POLLUTANT (by Chem ical Abstract Service Num ber)

5 0 0 0 0 F o r m a l d e h y d e
5 1 2 8 5 2

, 4

- D i n i t r o p h e n o l
51796 Ethyl carbamate (Urethane)

5 3 9 6 3 2

- A c e t y l a m i n o f l u o r e n e 5 6 2 3 5 C a r b o n t e t r a c h l o r i d e 5 6 3 8 2 P a r a t h i o n 5 7 1 4 7 1

, 1

- D i m e t h y l h y d r a z i n e 5 7 5 7 8 b e t a P r o p i o l a c t o n e 5 7 7 4 9 C h l o r d a n e 58899 Lindane (gamma hexachlorocyclohexane) (all isomers)

5 9 8 9 2 N

- N i t r o s o m o r p h o l i n e 6 0 1 1 7 D i m e t h y l a m i n o a z o b e n z e n e 6 0 3 4 4 M e t h y l h y d r a z i n e 6 0 3 5 5 A c e t a m i d e 6 2 5 3 3 A n i l i n e 6 2 7 3 7 D i c h l o r v o s 6 2 7 5 9 N

- N i t r o s o d i m e t h y l a m i n e 6 3 2 5 2 C a r b a r y l
6 4 6 7 5 D i e t h y l s u l f a t e 6 7 5 6 1 M e t h a n o l
6 7 6 6 3 C h l o r o f o r m 6 7 7 2 1 H e x a c h l o r o e t h a n e 6 8 1 2 2 D i m e t h y l f o r m a m i d e 71432 Benzene (including Benzene from gasoline)
71556 Methyl chloroform (1,1,1-Trichloroethane)

7 2 4 3 5 M e t h o x y c h l o r 7 2 5 5 9 D D E ( p

, p

- D i c h l o r o d i p h e n y l d i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e )
74839 Methyl bromide (Bromomethane)
74873 Methyl chloride (Chloromethane)
74884 Methyl iodide (Iodomethane)
75003 Ethyl chloride (Chloroethane)

7 5 0 1 4 V i n y l c h l o r i d e 7 5 0 5 8 A c e t o n i t r i l e 7 5 0 7 0 A c e t a l d e h y d e 75092 Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)

7 5 1 5 0 C a r b o n d i s u l f i d e 7 5 2 1 8 E t h y l e n e o x i d e 7 5 2 5 2 B r o m o f o r m 75343 Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-Dichloroethane)
75354 Vinylidene chloride (1,1-Dichloroethylene)

7 5 4 4 5 P h o s g e n e 75558 1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl aziridine)

7 5 5 6 9 P r o p y l e n e o x i d e 7 6 4 4 8 H e p t a c h l o r

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 31 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons

CAS POLLUTANT (by Chem ical Abstract Service Num ber)

7 7 4 7 4 H e x a c h l o r o c y c l o p e n t a d i e n e 7 7 7 8 1 D i m e t h y l s u l f a t e 7 8 5 9 1 I s o p h o r o n e 78875 Propylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloropropane)
78933 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone)

7 9 0 0 5 1

, 1

, 2

- T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e 7 9 0 1 6 T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e 7 9 0 6 1 A c r y l a m i d e 7 9 1 0 7 A c r y l i c a c i d

7 9 1 1 8 C h l o r o a c e t i c a c i d

7 9 3 4 5 1

, 1

, 2

, 2

- T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e 79447 Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride

7 9 4 6 9 2

- N i t r o p r o p a n e 8 0 6 2 6 M e t h y l m e t h a c r y l a t e 8 2 6 8 8 P e n t a c h l o r o n i t r o b e n z e n e ( Q u i n t o b e n z e n e )
8 4 7 4 2 D i b u t y l p h t h a l a t e 8 5 4 4 9 P h t h a l i c a n h y d r i d e 8 7 6 8 3 H e x a c h l o r o b u t a d i e n e 8 7 8 6 5 P e n t a c h l o r o p h e n o l
8 8 0 6 2 2

, 4

, 6

- T r i c h l o r o p h e n o l
9 0 0 4 0 o

- A n i s i d i n e 9 1 2 0 3 N a p h t h a l e n e 9 1 2 2 5 Q u i n o l i n e 9 1 9 4 1 3

, 3

- D i c h l o r o b e n z i d i n e 9 2 5 2 4 B i p h e n y l
9 2 6 7 1 4

- A m i n o b i p h e n y l
9 2 8 7 5 B e n z i d i n e 9 2 9 3 3 4

- N i t r o b i p h e n y l
94757 2,4-D, salts,esters (Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
9 5 4 7 6 o

- X y l e n e s 9 5 4 8 7 o

- C r e s o l
9 5 5 3 4 o

- T o l u i d i n e 9 5 8 0 7 2

, 4

- T o l u e n e d i a m i n e 9 5 9 5 4 2

, 4

, 5

- T r i c h l o r o p h e n o l
9 6 0 9 3 S t y r e n e o x i d e 9 6 1 2 8 1

, 2

- D i b r o m o

- 3

- c h l o r o p r o p a n e 9 6 4 5 7 E t h y l e n e t h i o u r e a 9 8 0 7 7 B e n z o t r i c h l o r i d e 9 8 8 2 8 C u m e n e ( I s o p r o p y l b e n z e n e )
9 8 8 6 2 A c e t o p h e n o n e 9 8 9 5 3 N i t r o b e n z e n e 1 0 0 0 2 7 4

- N i t r o p h e n o l
1 0 0 4 1 4 E t h y l b e n z e n e 1 0 0 4 2 5 S t y r e n e 1 0 0 4 4 7 B e n z y l c h l o r i d e 1 0 1 1 4 4 4

, 4

- M e t h y l e n e

- b i s ( 2

- c h l o r o a n i l i n e )
101688 Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI)
1 0 1 7 7 9 4

, 4

- M e t h y l e n e d i a n i l i n e 1 0 6 4 2 3 p

- X y l e n e s 1 0 6 4 4 5 p

- C r e s o l

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 32 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons

CAS POLLUTANT (by Chem ical Abstract Service Num ber)

1

, 4

- D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 0 6 5 0 3
1 0 6 5 1 4
106887 1 0 6 4 6 7

p

- P h e n y l e n e d i a m i n e Q u i n o n e ( 1

, 4

- b e n z o q u i n o n e ) 1,2-Epoxybutane (1,2-Butylene oxide)
1 0 6 8 9 8 E p i c h l o r o h y d r i n ( 1

- c h l o r o

- 2

, 3

- e p o x y p r o p a n e )
106934 Ethylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)
1 0 6 9 9 0 1

, 3

- B u t a d i e n e 1 0 7 0 2 8 A c r o l e i n A l l y l c h l o r i d e 107062
1 0 7 1 3 1
1 0 7 2 1 1 E t h y l e n e g l y c o l Chloromethyl methyl ether
1 0 8 0 5 4
108101
1 0 8 3 1 6
1 0 8 3 8 3
1 0 8 3 9 4
1 0 8 8 8 3
1 0 8 9 0 7
1 0 8 9 5 2
1 1 0 5 4 3
1 1 1 4 2 2
111444 Dichloroethyl ether (B is(2 chloroethyl)ether)
1 1 4 2 6 1 P r o p o x u r ( B a y g o n )
B i s ( 2

- e t h y l h e x y l ) p h t h a l a t e ( D E H P )
H e x a c h l o r o b e n z e n e 1 0 7 0 5 1 Ethylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloroethane)
A c r y l o n i t r i l e

107302
V i n y l a c e t a t e Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) (Hexone)
M a l e i c a n h y d r i d e

m

- X y l e n e s

m

- C r e s o l
T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z e n e P h e n o l
H e x a n e D i e t h a n o l a m i n e

1 1 7 8 1 7
1 1 8 7 4 1
1 1 9 9 0 4 3

, 3

- D i m e t h o x y b e n z i d i n e 1 1 9 9 3 7
1 2 0 8 0 9
1 2 0 8 2 1
1 2 1 1 4 2 2

, 4

- D i n i t r o t o l u e n e 1 2 1 4 4 8 T r i e t h y l a m i n e N

, N

- D i m e t h y l a n i l i n e

1 2 3 3 1 9
1 2 3 3 8 6 P r o p i o n a l d e h y d e 3

, 3

- D i m e t h y l b e n z i d i n e C a t e c h o l
1

, 2

, 4

- T r i c h l o r o b e n z e n e

1 2 1 6 9 7
1 2 2 6 6 7 1

, 2

- D i p h e n y l h y d r a z i n e H y d r o q u i n o n e

1 2 3 9 1 1 1

, 4

- D i o x a n e ( 1

, 4

- D i e t h y l e n e o x i d e )
1 2 6 9 9 8 C h l o r o p r e n e ( 2

- c h l o r o

- 1

, 3

- b u t a d i e n e )
1 2 7 1 8 4 T e t r a c h l o r o e t h y l e n e ( P e r c h l o r o e t h y l e n e )
1 3 1 1 1 3 D i m e t h y l p h t h a l a t e 1 3 2 6 4 9 D i b e n z o f u r a n s 1 3 3 0 6 2 C a p t a n 1 3 3 9 0 4 C h l o r a m b e n 1 4 0 8 8 5 E t h y l a c r y l a t e 151564 Ethylene imine (Aziridine)
1 5 6 6 2 7 C a l c i u m c y a n a m i d e H y d r a z i n e 3 3 4 8 8 3 D i a z o m e t h a n e 4 6 3 5 8 1 C a r b o n y l s u l f i d e 3 0 2 0 1 2

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 33 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons

CAS POLLUTANT (by Chem ical Abstract Service Num ber)

5 1 0 1 5 6 C h l o r o b e n z i l a t e 5 3 2 2 7 4 2

- C h l o r o a c e t o p h e n o n e 534521 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, and salts
5 4 0 8 4 1 2

, 2

, 4

- T r i m e t h y l p e n t a n e 5 4 2 7 5 6 1

, 3

- D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e ( m i x t u r e )

5 4 2 8 8 1 B i s ( c h l o r o m e t h y l ) e t h e r 5 8 4 8 4 9 2

, 4

- T o l u e n e d i i s o c y a n a t e 593602 Vinyl bromide (bromoethene)
6 2 4 8 3 9 M e t h y l i s o c y a n a t e 6 8 0 3 1 9 H e x a m e t h y l p h o s p h o r a m i d e 6 8 4 9 3 5 N

- N i t r o s o

- N

- m e t h y l u r e a 8 2 2 0 6 0 H e x a m e t h y l e n e 1

, 6

- d i i s o c y a n a t e 1 1 2 0 7 1 4 1

, 3

- P r o p a n e s u l t o n e 1319773 Cresols/Cresylic acid (isomers and mixture)
1330207 Xylenes (isomers and mixture)
1 3 3 2 2 1 4 A s b e s t o s 1 3 3 6 3 6 3 P o l y c h l o r i n a t e d biphenyls (PCB's) (Aroclors)
1 5 8 2 0 9 8 T r i f l u r a l i n 1634044 Methyl tert butyl ether
1746016 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo p dioxin

7 5 5 0 4 5 0 T i t a n i u m t e t r a c h l o r i d e 7 6 4 7 0 1 0 H y d r o c h l o r i c a c i d
7664393 Hydrogen fluoride (Hydrofluoric acid)

7 7 2 3 1 4 0 P h o s p h o r u s 7 7 8 2 5 0 5 C h l o r i n e 7 8 0 3 5 1 2 P h o s p h i n e 8001352 Toxaphene (chlorinated camphene)

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 34 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# 15. Table C: Compounds As Listed In 112(b)

Compound Name Antimony Compounds Arsenic Compounds (inorganic including arsine) Beryllium Compounds Cadmium Compounds Chromium Compounds Cobalt Compounds
Coke Oven Emissions
Cyanide Compounds 1

Fine mineral fibers 3

Glycol ethers 2 Lead Compounds Manganese Compounds Mercury Compounds Nickel Compounds
Polycyclic Organic Matter 4

Radionuclides (including radon) 5 Selenium Compounds



### Note: Unless otherwise specified, “Glycol ethers” and all listings above that contain the word “compounds” are defined as including any unique chemical s ubstance that contains the named chemical (i.e., antimony, arsenic, etc.) as part of that chemical’s infrastructure.

1 

### X ’ CN where X = H’ or any other group where a formal dissociation may occur. For example, KCN or Ca(CN) 2



### .

2 

### Includes mono- and di-ethers of ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol R(OCH2CH2) n 

### -OR’ where

n = 1, 2, or 3 R = alkyl or aryl groups R’ = R, H, or groups which, when removed, yield glycol ethers with the structure: R(OCH2CH2) n 

### -OH. Polymers are excluded from the glycol category.

3 

### Includes mineral fibers emissions from facilities manufacturing or processing glass, rock, or slag fibers (or other mineral derived fibers) of average diameter 1 micrometer or less.

4 

### Includes organic compounds with more than one benzene ring, and which have a boiling point greater than or equal to 100 o 

### C.

5 

### A type of atom that spontaneously undergoes radioactive decay.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 35 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix A WORKSHEET FOR A NEW FACILITY

D a t e * : F o r Y e a r * : T a x I D / P l a n t C o d e * :

F a c i l i t y N a m e * : P r i m a r y F a c i l i t y I D * :

R e g i o n * : C o u n t y * : M u n i c i p a l i t y * :

S I C * : N A I C S :

Contact Ty pe Nam e Address Telephone

Firm*

Location

Corporate

Fee

Inspection

Permit

Responsible Offic i al

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 36 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix A WORKSHEET FOR A NEW FACILITY (cont’d)

Location Information

L a t i t u d e * : UTM E l e v a t i o n : N o r t h :

L o n g i t u d e * : C o o r d i n a t e s Z o n e : E a s t :

Fuel Use Summary *

Type Total Use Type Total Use

Pollutant Summary *

(Sum of Individual and Miscellaneous Sub Facilities) Emission Estimates (0.00 Tons/Year)

A m m o n i a P M 1 0

C O P M 2

. 5

L e a d SO X



### NO X 

### V O C

*Indi cat es a requi red fi el d

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 37 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix B WORKSHEET FOR MISCELLANEOUS SOURCE EMISSIONS

Date*: ____________________ For Year*: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code*: _________________

Facility Name*: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID*: _________________

Other Miscellaneous Sub Facility Emi ssions (Criteria/HAPs/Non-Criteria)

Sub Facility (optional name) Pollutant CAS Amount (0.00) Calc Method

Note : Most criteria pollutants and HAPs need to be reported if greater than 0.5 TPY. The following pollutants need to be reported if greater than the amount listed:

Polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs) 0.01 TPY Mercury (Hg) 0.01 TPY
Lead (Pb) 0.01 TPY Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 TPY
Dioxins 0.02 Lbs/Yr
Furans 0.02 Lbs/Yr
*Indi cat es a requi red fi el d

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 38 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix C WORKSHEET FOR NEW COMBUSTION UNITS

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________

Unit Name:

Descript i on:

Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:

DEP Permit No.: Connected to FML(s)?:



## Actual Emission Estimates (Tons/Yr) fo r Emission Fees and Emission Statements

Pollutant CAS Emission Amt (0.00 TPY) Calculation Method

C O

L e a d

NH 3



### N O X

P M 1 0

P M 2

. 5

S O X

V O C

Additional Pollutants (enter HAPs individually):

NOTE: Most Criteria pollutants and HAPS need to be reported if greater than 0.5 TPY. The following pollutants need to be reported if greater t han the amounts listed:

Polychlorobiphenols (PCB) 0.01 TPY Mercury (Hg) 0.01 TPY
Lead (Pb) 0.01 TPY Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 TPY
Dioxins (submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr
Furans (submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 39 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix C WORKSHEET FOR NEW COMBUSTION UNITS (cont’d)

First Fuel Burned:

________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr:

_________________________ SCC, if known:

________________ _____________________________________________________ FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft 3 

### : ____________

SCHEDULE 1

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

SCHEDULE 2

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

2 nd 

### Fuel Burned:

________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr:

_________________________

SCC, if known:

________________ _____________________________________________________ FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft 3 

### : ____________

SCHEDULE 1

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

SCHEDULE 2

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 40 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix C WORKSHEET FOR NEW COMBUSTION UNITS (cont’d)

First Control Device
Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate (gal/min): DEP ID number? Is Material Collected/ Land filled on Site?

Pollutant Control Efficiencies

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other)



## Second Control Device
Type (Bughouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate (gal/min): DEP ID number? Is Material Collected Land filled on Site?

Pollutant Control Efficiencies

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other)

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 41 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix C WORKSHEET FOR NEW COMBUSTION UNITS (cont’d)

First Stack

Inside Diameter: Height:

Flow Volume ACFM: Veloc i ty (m/s ec ): Distance to Nearest Property Line:

Temperature °F: Mois ture %: DEP ID Number?

Stack Discharge Type: ________

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward

Z = Fugitive Emissions



## Second Stack

Inside Diameter: Height:

Flow Volume ACFM: Veloc i ty (m/s ec ): Distance to Nearest Property Line:

Temperature °F: Mois ture %: DEP ID Number?

Stack Discharge Type: ________

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward

Z = Fugitive Emissions

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 42 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________

Process Name:

Descript i on:

Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:

DEP Permit No.: Connected to FML(s)?:

Actual Emission Estimates (Tons/Yr) fo r Emission Fees and Emission Statements

Pollutant CAS Emission Amt (0.00 TPY) Calculation Method

C O

L e a d

NH 3



### N O X

P M 1 0

P M 2

. 5

S O X

V O C

Additional Pollutants (enter HAPs individually):

NOTE: Most Criteria pollutants and HAPS need to be reported if greater than 0.5 TPY. The following pollutants need to be reported if greater t han the amounts listed:

Polychlorobiphenols (PCB) 0.01 TPY Mercury (Hg) 0.01 TPY
Lead (Pb) 0.01 TPY Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 TPY
Dioxins (Submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr
Furans (Submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 43 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES (cont’d)

First Material Processed or Produced:

_____________________________________________________ SCC, if known:

________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr:

_________________________ SCHEDULE 1

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

SCHEDULE 2

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

2nd Material Processed or Produced:

_____________________________________________________ SCC, if known:

________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr:

_________________________ SCHEDULE 1

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

SCHEDULE 2

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 44 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES (cont’d)

First Fuel Burned:

________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr:

_________________________ SCC, if known:

________________ _____________________________________________________ FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft 3 

### : ____________

SCHEDULE 1

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

SCHEDULE 2

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

2 nd 

### Fuel Burned:

________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr:

_________________________

SCC, if known:

________________ _____________________________________________________ FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft 3 

### : ____________

SCHEDULE 1

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

SCHEDULE 2

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 45 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES (cont’d)

First Control Device
Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate (gal/min): DEP ID number? Is Material Collec t ed/ Landfilled on Site?

Pollutant Control Efficiencies

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other)



## Second Control Device
Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate (gal/min): DEP ID number? Is Material Collec t ed/ Landfilled on Site?

Pollutant Control Efficiencies

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other)

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 46 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix D WORKSHEET FOR NEW PROCESSES (cont’d)

First Stack

Inside Diameter: Height:

Flow Volume ACFM: Veloc i ty (m/s ec ): Distance to Nearest Property Line:

Temperature °F: Mois ture %: DEP ID Number?

Stack Discharge Type: ________

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward

Z = Fugitive Emissions



## Second Stack

Inside Diameter: Height:

Flow Volume ACFM: Veloc i ty (m/s ec ): Distance to Nearest Property Line:

Temperature °F: Mois ture %: DEP ID Number?

Stack Discharge Type: ________

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward

Z = Fugitive Emissions

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 47 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________

Incinerator Name:

Descript i on:

Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:
Incinerator Capacity: Primary Burner Capacity: Secondary Burner Capacity:

Incinerator Class: Waste Type (see back): DEP Permit No.:

Exhaust Flow(ACFM): Exhaust Temp: Exhaust Moisture (%):

Exhaust CO2 (%): Connected to FML(s)?

Actual Emission Estimates (Tons/Yr) for Emission Fees and Emission Statements:

Pollutant CAS Emis s i on Amt (0.00 TPY) Calculation Method

C O

L e a d

NH 3



### N O X

P M 1 0

P M 2

. 5

S O X

V O C

Additional Pollutants (enter HAPs individually):

NOTE: Most Criteria pollutants and HAPS need to be reported if greater than 0.5 TPY. The following pollutants need to be reported if greater t han the amounts listed:

Polychlorobiphenols (PCB) 0.01 TPY Mercury (Hg) 0.01 TPY
Lead (Pb) 0.01 TPY Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) 0.01 TPY
Dioxins (Submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr
Furans (Submit Lbs/Yr only) 0.02 Lbs/Yr

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 48 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS (cont’d)

Primary Material Incinerated

_____________________________________________________ SCC, if known:

________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr:

_________________________ SCHEDULE 1

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

SCHEDULE 2

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

Secondary Material Incinerated

_____________________________________________________ SCC, if known:

________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr:

_________________________ SCHEDULE 1

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

SCHEDULE 2

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 49 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS (cont’d)

First Fuel Burned:

________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr:

_________________________ SCC, if known:

________________ _____________________________________________________ FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft 3 

### : ____________

SCHEDULE 1

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

SCHEDULE 2

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

2 nd 

### Fuel Burned:

________________ Maximum Throughput/Hr:

_________________________

SCC, if known:

________________ _____________________________________________________ FML? (y/n) ___ % Sulfur: _________ % Ash: __________ BTU/lb-gal-ft 3 

### : ____________

SCHEDULE 1

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

SCHEDULE 2

Date Effective: Monthly Throughput in (Units):

Date End: JAN: ___________ FEB: ___________ MAR: __________

Total Days: APR: ___________ MAY: __________ JUN: __________

Total Hours: JUL: ___________ AUG: ___________ SEP: ___________

Days per Week: OCT: ___________ NOV: ___________ DEC: ___________

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 50 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS (cont’d)

First Control Device
Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate (gal/min): DEP ID number? Is Material Collec t ed/ Landfilled on Site?

Pollutant Control Efficiencies

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other)

Second Control Dev i ce Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate (gal/min): DEP ID number? Is Material Collec t ed/ Landfilled on Site?

Pollutant Control Efficiencies

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other)

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 51 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS (cont’d)

First Stack

Inside Diameter: Height:

Flow Volume ACFM: Veloc i ty (m/s ec ): Distance to Nearest Property Line:

Temperature °F: Mois ture %: DEP ID Number?

Stack Discharge Type: ________

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward

Z = Fugitive Emissions

Second Stack

Inside Diameter: Height:

Flow Volume ACFM: Veloc i ty (m/s ec ): Distance to Nearest Property Line:

Temperature °F: Mois ture %: DEP ID Number?

Stack Discharge Type: ________

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward

Z = Fugitive Emissions

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 52 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix E WORKSHEET FOR NEW INCINERATORS (cont’d)

INCINERATOR CLASS CODES

Class I Portable packaged incinerators having a bur ning rate up to but not including 100 pounds per hour of Type 0 or Type 1 waste or 75 pounds per hour of Type 2 or Type 3 waste. Class II Flue fed single chamber incinerators capable of burning Type 0 or Type 1 waste at the rate of 100 pounds or more per hour or Type 2 waste at the rate of 75 pounds or more per hour. New installations of these units ar e not acceptable to the Department. Class IIA Chute fed multi-chamber incinerators suit able for burning Type 0 and Type 1 waste at the rate of 100 pounds or more per hour. Class III Direct fed incinerators suitable for burni ng Type 0 and Type 1 waste at the rate of 100 pounds or more per hour or Type 2 waste at the rate of 75 pounds or more per hour. Class IV Incinerators suitable for burning Type 3 waste at the rate of 75 pounds or more per hour. Class V Municipal incinerators suitabl e for burning a combination of wastes. Class VI Crematory and pathological incinerators suit able for burning Type 4 waste at the rate of 25 pounds or more per hour. Class VII Special incinerators designed to burn Type 5, Ty pe 6, Type 7 or special wastes at the rate of 25 pounds or more per hour. Class CA Controlled air incinerators designed to burn waste from institutional, commercial and industrial operation.

INCINERATOR WASTE TYPE CODES

Trash : a mixture of highly combustible waste such as paper, cardboard cartons, wood boxes, and combustible floor sweepings from commercial and industrial activities containing up to 10% by -weight of plastic bags, coated paper, laminated paper, treated corrugated cardboard, o ily rags and plastic or rubber scraps.

Rubbish : a mixture of combustible waste such as paper, ca rdboard cartons, wood scrip, foliage and combustible floor sweepings from domestic, commercial, and i ndustrial activities containing up to 20% by-weight of restaurant or cafeteria waste, but little or no treated papers, plastic or rubber wastes.

Refuse : consisting of approximately an even mixture of rubbish and garbage by-weight.

Garbage : consisting of animal and vegetable uses from cafeteri as, hotels, hospitals, mark ets, and like installations.

Rem a ins : human and/or animal consisting of carcasses, organs and solid organic wastes from hospitals, laboratories, abattoirs, animal pounds and similar sub facilities.

By -prod : gaseous, liquid, or semi-liquid, such as tar, paints, solvents, sludge, fumes, etc ., from industrial operations.

Solids : by-product waste such as rubber, plastics, wood waste, etc., from industrial operations.

Sludge : the accumulated settled solids deposited from sewage.

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 53 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix F WORKSHEET FOR NEW CONTROL DEVICES

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________

First Control Dev i ce Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate (gal/min): DEP ID number? Is Material Collec t ed/ Landfilled on Site?

Pollutant Control Efficiencies

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other)

Second Control Device
Type (Baghouse, ESP, etc.): Manufacturer: Model: Date Ins t alled:

Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate (gal/min): DEP ID number? Is Material Collec t ed/ Landfilled on Site?

Pollutant Control Efficiencies

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other)

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 54 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix G WORKSHEET FOR NEW STACKS

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________

S t ack 1

Company Designation: Base Elevation (Ft):

Inside Diameter: Height:

Flow Volume ACFM: Veloc i ty (m/s ec ):

Temperature °F: Mois ture %: DEP ID Number?

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening

Stack Discharge Type: ________ W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward

Z = Fugitive Emissions

Latitude* (to 0.0 seconds): Longitude* (to 0.0 seconds):

Latitude (to 0.0 seconds): Longitude (to 0.0 seconds):

M e t h o d : H o r i z o n t a l Accu r a c y : G e o m e t r i c T y p e :

Horizontal Reference Datum: Reference Point:

S t ack 2

Company Designation: Base Elevation (Ft):

Inside Diameter: Height:

Flow Volume ACFM: Veloc i ty (m/s ec ):

Temperature °F: Mois ture %: DEP ID Number?

S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening

Stack Discharge Type: ________ W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward

Z = Fugitive Emissions

Latitude (to 0.0 seconds): Longitude (to 0.0 seconds):

M e t h o d : H o r i z o n t a l Accu r a c y : G e o m e t r i c T y p e :

Horizontal Reference Datum: Reference Point:

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 55 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix H WORKSHEET FOR NEW FUEL MATERIAL LOCATIONS

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________

Please identify all locations that store fuel used by more than one air pollution sub facility or Control Device in the emissions year. The reason we are identifying fuel locations is to associate the characteri stics of the fuel (%Sulfur, %Ash, Btu) once with the fuel location, instead of multiple time s with each sub facility fed by the fuel location. Rules for creating fuel locations are:

1. Create a fuel location only if it supplies fuel to more than one sub facility in an emissions year. If a sub facility is fed by its own fuel location, enter the fuel characteristics with its f uel record in your operations data.
2. A fuel location can store only one type of fuel in an emissions year.
3. If it changed the fuel stored during the year, create a separate fuel lo cation for each of the fuels used.
4. A sub facility can be fed a specific f uel from only one fuel location in a year.

Fuel Material Location 1

Company Name: Fuel Type:

Storage Capacity: Date Ins t alled:

Sub Facilities Fed By This location

Fuel Analyses for Reporting Year

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 56 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix H WORKSHEET FOR NEW FUEL MATERIAL LOCATIONS (cont’d)

Fuel Material Location 2

Company Name: Fuel Type:

Storage Capacity: Date Ins t alled:

Sub Facilities Fed By This location

Fuel Analyses for Reporting Year

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

Fuel Material Location 3

Company Name: Fuel Type:

Storage Capacity: Date Ins t alled:

Sub Facilities Fed By This location

Fuel Analyses for Reporting Year

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

%ASH: %Sulfur : BTU: Units ( lb-gal-c uft): Date Sampled:

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 57 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons



# Appendix I WORKSHEET FOR CHANGES TO EXISTING STACKS OR CONTROL DEVICES

Date: ____________________ For Year: _______________ Tax ID/Plant Code: _________________

Facility Name: _________________________________________ Primary Facility ID: _______________

DEP ID of First Stack: ______________

Enter only changed characteristics

Inside Diameter: Height:

Flow Volume ACFM: Veloc i ty (m/s ec ): Distance to Nearest Property Line:

Temperature °F: Mois ture %:

Stack Discharge Type: ________ S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward

Z = Fugitive Emissions

Notes:

DEP ID of Second Stack: ______________

Enter only changed characteristics

Inside Diameter: Height:

Flow Volume ACFM: Veloc i ty (m/s ec ): Distance to Nearest Property Line:

Temperature °F: Mois ture %:

Stack Discharge Type: ________ S = Vertical Unobstructed Opening

W = Vertical Weather Cap or Similar Obstruction

X = Horizontal or Nearly Horizontal

Y = Downward or Nearly Downward

Z = Fugitive Emissions

Notes:

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 58 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emi ssi ons Invent o ry Report i ng Inst ruct i ons 

# Appendix I WORKSHEET FOR CHANGES TO EXISTING STACKS OR CONTROL DEVICES (cont’d)

DEP ID of First Control Device: _________________

Enter only changed characteristics
Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate (gal/min): Is Material Collected/ Landfilled on Site?

Pollutant Control Efficiencies

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other)

Notes:

DEP ID of Second Control Device: _________________

Enter only changed characteristics
Pressure Drop (in/water): Scrubber Flow Rate (gal/min): Is Material Collected Landfilled on Site?

Pollutant Control Efficiencies

Pollutant Efficiency % Sub Facility (mfr rating, calculated, other)

Notes:

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 59 - D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 5

### 2005 Emissions Inventory Reporting Instructions

DEP Bureau of Air Quality

- 

### 60 - December 2005 

# Appendix J CERTIFICATION OF DATA ACCURACY

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ACT 

# CERTIFICATION OF DATA ACCURACY

FOR COMPANIES SUBJECT TO EMISSION STATEMENT REGULATION

Firm-Plant Code (federal tax ID + plant code assigned by DEP):

AFS Number (AIRS ID assigned by DEP):

Primary Facility ID (assigned by DEP):

Company Name:

Plant Address:



### I,

__________________________ _ , certify under penalty of law as provided in 18 Pa. C.S. §4904 and Section 9(b)(2) of the Air Pollution Control Act, 35 P.S., §4009(b)(2) that I am a company officer or plant manager or authorized representative of the facility identified above, authorized to make this affidavit. I further certify that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information contained in this Emission Statement are true, accurate, and complete.

Signature:

Name:

(Print or Type)

Title:

(Print or Type)

Date:

# PECHAN

5528

- B Hempstead Way Springfield, VA 22151

703

- 813

- 6700 telephone

703

- 813

- 6729 facsimile

3622 Lyckan Parkway

Suite 2002

Durham, NC 27707

919

- 493

- 3144 telephone

919

- 493

- 3182 facsimile

P.O. Box 1575 Shingle Springs, CA 95682

5 30

- 672

- 0441 telephone

530

- 672

- 0504 facsimile 

# P ENNSYLVANIA 

# 2002

A REA 

# S OURCE 

# C RITERIA



# A IR 

# P OLLUTANT 

# E MISSION



# E STIMATION 

# M ETHODS

Prepared for:

Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality

P.O. Box 2357 Harrisburg, PA 1 7105

- 2357

Prepared by:

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 3622 Lyckan Parkway

Suite 2002

Durham, NC 27707

Contract No. SP3580003990

Work Order 9

February 2004

Pechan Rpt. No. 04.02.006/9420.109

### iii 

## CONTENTS

Page
AREA SOURCE DEFINITION

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 1
METHODS FOR ESTIMATING AREA SOURCE ACTIVITY AND EMISSIONS

................................ .................. 1 Control Efficiency (CE)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 3 Rule Penetration (RP)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 3 Rule Effectiveness (RE)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 3
Seasonal Emission Calculations

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 4
Point Source Subtractions

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 5
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION

– ANIMAL HUSBANDRY

................................ ................................ ................ 9
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION

– CROPS (Fertilizer Application) (14 SCCs)

................................ ...................... 9 ARCHITECTURAL SURFACE COATING (SCC 2401001000)

................................ ................................ ................ 9 ASPHALT PAVING (2 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 10 AUTOMOTIVE REFINISHING (SCC 2401005000)

................................ ................................ ................................ . 12 BAKERIES (SCC 2302050000)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 13 BREWERIES (SCC 2302070001)

................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 14 COAL COMBUSTION (6 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 16
COMMERCIAL AND CONSU MER SOLVENT USE (SCC 2465000000)

................................ .............................. 20 COMMERCIAL COOKING (5 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 21 COMPOSTING (3 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 22 DEGREASING (4 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 23 DRY CLEANERS (SCC 2420000370)

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 24 ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES (SCC 2401060000)

................................ ................................ ................................ .... 25 ELECTRICAL INSULATION (SCC 2401065000)

................................ ................................ ................................ .... 26 FACTORY FINISHED WOOD (SCC 2401015000)

................................ ................................ ................................ .. 27 FOREST FIRES (SCC 2810001000)

................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 27 FUEL OIL COMBUSTION (3 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 28 GASOLINE MARKETING (5 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 32 GRAPHIC ARTS (SCC 2425000000)

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 36 HIGH PERFORMANCE INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE SOLVENT (SCC 2401100000)

................................ ... 36 KEROSENE (2 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 37 LANDFILLS (SCC 2620030000)

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 40 MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT (SCC 2401055000)

................................ ................................ ........................... 41 MARINE COATING (SCC 2401080000)

................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 42 METAL CANS (SCC 2401040000)

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 42
METAL FURN ITURE AND FIXTURES (SCC 2401025000)

................................ ................................ ................... 43 MISCELLANEOUS FINISHED METAL (SCC 2401050000)

................................ ................................ .................. 44 MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING (SCC 2401090 000)

................................ ................................ ................ 45 NATURAL GAS AND LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS (LPG) (4 SCCs)

................................ ............................... 45 OPEN BURNING (5 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 51 OTHER SPECIAL PURPOSE COATING (SCC 2401200000)

................................ ................................ ................. 54 OTHER TRANSPORTATION (SCC 2401085000)

................................ ................................ ................................ ... 55
PESTICIDE APPLICATION (SCC 2461800000)

................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 56 PORTABLE GASOLINE CONTAINERS (SCC 2501060300)

................................ ................................ .................. 56 REFRIGERANT LOSSES (SCC 2399010000)

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 58 PUBLIC OWNED TREATMENT WORKS (3 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ............................... 59 RESIDENTIAL WOOD COMBUSTION (7 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ ... 60 SOLID WASTE INCINERATION (2 SCCs)

................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 61 STRUCTURE FIRES (SCC 2810030000)

................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 64 TRAFFIC LINE PAINTING (SCC 2401008000)

................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 65 WINERIES (SCC 2302070005)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 66 WOOD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING (SCC 2401020000)

................................ ................................ .............. 67
APPENDIX A: REFERENCES

................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 1

### iv [This page intentionally left blank.]

### 1 

## AREA SOURCE DEFINITION

For emission inventory development purposes, the term “area sources” traditionally refers to
stationar y air pollutant emission sources that are not inventoried at the facility

- level. While point sources are inventoried individually, area sources are typically inventoried at the county level ( Introduction to Area Source Emission Inventory Development Volum e III: Chapter 1 ). 1



## http://www. epa.gov/ttn/chief/cerr/index.html Gasoline stations and dry cleaning establishments are often treated as both point and area sources. The main reason they are not exclusively treated as point sources is that the effort required to gather data and estimate emissions for each individual facility is very great, while emissions per facility are generally small. For these sources, a cut

- off point, typically based on annual emissions, usually defines the distinction between point and area. The Consolidated Emissions Reporti ng Rule (CERR) specifies reporting criteria air pollutant (CAP) thresholds for point and area sources, which vary depending on the pollutant and the attainment status of a county (see ).

Individual emissions sources are grouped with other like sources into source categories. These source categories are grouped in such a way that they can be estimated collectively using one methodology. Most area sourc e categories do not have an analogue in the point source inventory. Pesticide use and commercial/consumer product use are such examples. The boundaries of the individual activities associated with these sources are often hard to determine or are, at best

, arbitrary. Even within a point source facility, some activities occur that are more easily treated as area source emissions. Some emissions associated with surface coating operations such as equipment cleaning, for example, can be more practically esti mated using area source methods even though other surface coating operations may be reported as part of the point source inventory.

METHODS FOR ESTIMATING AREA SOURCE ACTIVITY AND EMISSIONS

Area source emissions are generally estimated by multiplying an emission factor by some known indicator or collective activity for each area source category at the county level. Several methodologies are available for estimating area source activity levels and emissions. For this 2002 area source inventory, estimates were derived by (1) treating area sources as point sources, (2) obtaining county

- level activity data, (3) apportioning national or statewide activity data to counties, (4) use of per capita emission factors, and (5) use of per employee emission factors. Each approach has distinct advantages and disadvantages as discussed below.

Small sources that would normally be treated as area sources may be handled as point sources for several reasons. First, county level activity data may not be readily determinabl e for certain source categories. Municipal landfills provide an example of this situation.

For some source categories, county activity estimates were available. For example, monthly wine production data for 2002 were available by county from the Pennsyl vania Liquor Control

### 2 

## Board. If county activity data were not available, Commonwealth totals were apportioned to counties using data for a surrogate of the emissions activity. For example, the quantity of highway gasoline consumed in the Commonwealth was apportioned to the county level on the basis of vehicle miles traveled per county. Residential, commercial, and industrial fuel combustion were other categories that were handled in this manner. The major drawbacks of this approach are that additional da ta and resources are needed to apportion activity levels to the local level, and accuracy is lost in the process. If Commonwealth level data were not available, then
national data were used in a similar manner.

Sources in certain area source categories w ere not only numerous and diffuse, but were too difficult to inventory by any of the above procedures. As an example, solvent evaporation from consumer and commercial products such as waxes, aerosol products and window cleaners cannot be routinely determi ned by DEP. In addition, it would be resource

- intensive to develop and implement a survey that would yield such information. Per capita or per employee emission factors are used to estimate emissions for these source categories. The use of per capita em ission factors is based on the assumption that, for a given source category, emission activity can be reasonably associated with population. This assumption is valid over broad areas for certain categories such as Architectural Surface Coating and solvent evaporation from Consumer and
Commercial Products.

For categories that rely on a per capita emission factor, county population estimates for 2002
were obtained from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. W hen emissions are calculated from per employee emission factors, county

- level employment data for 2002 were estimated from a combination of two sources. Because county employment data for 2002 will not be available
from the Bureau of the Census’ County Business Patterns (CBP) until April 2004, 2001 data for
th e appropriate North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes were obtained
from the 2001 CBP 2 

## and projected to 2002 using the Commonwealth

- level 2001 to 2002 employment change for the appropriate NAICS codes. The Commonwealth

- level employme nt data were obtained at the NAICS code level from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 3



## In some cases, the Census does not report the number of employees in the separate counties within the Commonwealth for each category were employ ment value for a parti cular NAICS code/county combination because available ,but , of confidentiality concerns. In these cases, the Census provides employment data as a range (e.g., between 20 and 99 employees) , the . When a precise number of employees was not available from C BP, an initial estimate was developed
based on the mid

- point of the reported range (e.g., 60 employees was used for the 20 to 99 employment range). For a given NAICS code, the mid

- point estimates were then adjusted up or down to yield the Commonwealth

- lev el employment for that NAICS code as reported in the CBP. The adjustments were computed by first calculating the difference between the
Commonwealth

- level CBP employment and the total of the employment values for counties for which actual employment value s were reported in the CBP. The resulting value represents employment for the counties for which the CBP reports an employment range value. This value was then divided by the sum of the mid

- point employment estimates for the counties for which employment was reported as a range. The resulting ratio was multiplied by the mid

- point

### 3 

## estimates to yield the final county employment estimates. The calculation spreadsheets provide each of the steps used in this estimation procedure.

Control Efficiency (CE)

Co ntrol efficiency is the emission reduction percentage associated with a control device, process change or reformulation. Control efficiencies can vary widely by source within an area source category. Area source control efficiency values represent the we ighted average control for the
category.

Rule Penetration (RP)

Because lower

- emitting sources within a source category may not be covered by a regulation, it is important to reflect the extent to which total source category emissions are affected. Rule penetration represents the percentage of total source category emissions that are affected by a regulation.

Rule Effectiveness (RE)

Rule effectiveness is a factor used to adjust the control efficiency to account for failures and
uncertainties that affect the actual performance of the control. For example, control equipment performance may be adversely affected by age of the equipment, lack of maintenance, or improper use. With the exception of Federal regulations, a default RE value of 80 percent was

ap plied when information was not available to substantiate the true RE value. 1 

## An RE of 100 percent was applied to all Federal regulations that require national compliance.

The RE factor is applied to the esti mated control efficiency in the calculation of emissions from a source. The formula for the application of CE, RP, and RE is displayed below:

Uncontrolled Emissions = 50 pounds per day Control Efficiency = 90 percent
Rule Penetration = 60 percent
Rule Effectiveness = 80 percent

Controlled Emissions = Uncontrolled Emissions × (1

– CE/100 × RP/100 × RE/100)

Controlled Emissions = 50 × (1

– 0.9 × 0.6 × 0.8) = 50 × (1

– 0.432) = 28.4 pounds per day

An RE and/or RP value can substantially increase emissi on estimates when high control efficiencies are involved. For example, if RP was not applied in the above example (equivalent to a 100 percent RP assumption), then estimated emissions are:

Controlled Emissions = 50 × (1

– 0.9 × 0.8) = 50 × (1

– 0.72) = 1 4 pounds per day.

### 4 

## Seasonal Emission Calculations

Area source emissions are typically prepared first on an annual basis because activity data are generally only available on an annual basis. The recently promulgated Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) requires States to submit county

- level area source CAP emission inventories to EPA for three temporal periods: annual, summer season work weekday, and winter season work weekday (the latter for carbon monoxide and particulate matter emissions only) . Summer season work weekday emission inventories are needed to support planning for ozone NAAQS attainment. The summer season refers to the peak ozone season months of June, July, and August. Winter season work weekday emission inventories are used to support carbon monoxide (CO) NAAQS attainment planning. The winter season refers to January, February, and December of the same year (e.g., 2002).

Seasonal emission estimates are calculated by adjusting the annual inventory to reflect activity during the summer and winter season. Summer work weekday and winter work weekday emissions are calculated by multiplying annual emissions by the appropriate allocation factor. For most source categories, summer and winter work weekday allocation factors were devel oped from default monthly and weekly profiles available from EPA’s Emissions Modeling ClearingHouse (EMCH). 4



## The EMCH provides 807 different monthly profiles and 45 different weekly profiles. The first step in developing summer allocation factors was t o compute summer monthly ratios by dividing the sum of the June, July, and August monthly profile values by the total of the twelve monthly profile values. Winter monthly ratios were calculated in a similar manner, except monthly profile values for Januar y, February, and December were incorporated into the calculation. Weekday profile values were computed by dividing the sum of the Monday through Friday weekly profile values by the total profile value for the entire week.

Summer work weekday allocation f actors were calculated by multiplying the summer monthly ratios by the appropriate weekday ratio and then dividing the result by 65 (the number of work weekdays in the summer of 2002). In a like manner, winter work weekday allocation factors were computed by multiplying winter monthly ratios by the appropriate weekday ratio and dividing by 65 (the number of work weekdays in the winter of 2002).

These allocation factors were then matched to area source classification codes (SCCs) via a
crosswalk between SC Cs and temporal profiles available from EPA’s EMCH. Annual emissions for each SCC/county/pollutant combination were then multiplied by the appropriate summer work weekday allocation factor to yield summer work weekday emissions. Winter work weekday emiss ions were calculated for categories emitting CO and/or PM. Similar to the summer calculations, annual CO and PM emissions were multiplied by the appropriate winter work weekday allocation factor to yield winter work weekday emissions.

For source categori es for which actual monthly/seasonal activity data were available (e.g., Residential Natural Gas Combustion, Structure Fires, and Wineries), summer and winter season allocation factors were calculated from the available activity data. The following presen ts

### 5 

## sample calculations performed to develop the summer work weekday allocation factor for Bakeries. The individual source category methodology sections present the calculations performed to compute each category’s seasonal emission estimates.

SAMPLE CALC ULATION OF SUMMER SEASON WORK WEEKDAY ALLOCATION FACTOR:

Bakeries (SCC 2302050000)

25

. 0 996 83 83 83 Values Profile Monthly of Total Value) Profile August Value Profile July Value Profile (June

= + +

= + +

= Ratio Season Summer

715

. 0 1000 143 143 143 143 143

= + + + +

= = Values Weekly of Sum Values Profile Friday through Monday of Sum Ratio Weekday



## Summer Work Weekday Allocation Factor = 0.25 × 0.715 ÷ 65 = 0.00275

For source categories for which actual seasonal emi ssions activity data were available (e.g., Residential Natural Gas Combustion, Structure Fires, and Wineries), the summer and winter season allocation factors were developed from these activity data.

Point Source Subtractions

Source categories can appear in both the area source and point source inventory. For example, emissions from large dry cleaning establishments may be included in the point source inventory, while emissions from smaller dry cleaners (below some specified cutoff) are included in the a rea source inventory. When a point source inventory and an area source inventory include emissions from the same process, the area source emission estimates are adjusted to avoid double

- counting. Although many area source categories (e.g., Architectural Surface Coating) do not have companion point source categories, there are many source categories in the area source inventory for which emissions are reported in the Pennsylvania point source inventory (see Table 1). For these source categories, point sou rce emissions are subtracted from total emission estimates to yield area source emissions. Ideally, this adjustment would occur in the area source emission calculation by subtracting point source emission activity (throughput) from total emission activity as shown below.



# ( ) ( ) Activity Source Point Activity Total Activity Source Area

− =

### 6 

## However, the Pennsylvania point source inventory does not report throughput for most sources. Therefore, it was necessary to calculate the point source subtractions using total and point source
emission estimates as identified below.



# ( ) ( )

p p p 

### Emissions Source Point Emissions Total Emissions Area

− =



## where: p = pollutant

Separate point source inventories were developed for Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and for all other counties. Except for ammonia and lead, the Allegheny inventory reports annual emissions for all pollutants included in the area source inventory. These pollutants are also missing from the Philadelphia County annual inventory. Unlike the Allegheny inventory, the Philadelphia County inventory does not report PM emissions on a filt erable and condensable basis, but rather on a primary basis. The inventory for the remaining counties reports annual emissions for the same pollutants as the Philadelphia County inventory, with the exception of primary PM 2.5 

## (PM25

- PRI), which is not repor ted for the remaining counties. Given the different ways in which PM emissions are reported in the 2002 Pennsylvania point source inventory, it was necessary to develop PM emissions on a consistent basis to facilitate the point source
subtractions. There fore, for Allegheny County, Pechan summed the condensable and the
filterable PM emissions to obtain PM10

- PRI and PM25

- PRI emission values for use in the point
source subtractions.

Although the point source inventories also report winter and summer day emi ssions, these estimates were not used in the point source subtractions. The annual emission estimates were used in the subtractions because it is not clear if every point source facility that would have emissions during the summer/winter have these emissi ons reported in the inventory. For example, there are only 14 records with winter day NO
x 

## emissions in the point source inventory, while there are over 4,000 records with annual NO
x 

## emissions reported in the inventory.

To facilitate the point source subt ractions, the annual emission records for all point SCCs associated with an area source category were summed to the county level. Because PA DEP indicated that point source subtractions should be applied to the Machinery and Equipment Solvent Coating area source category by subtracting point source emission records associated with the combination of point SCCs 40202501, 40202502, and 40202599 and SIC code 3531, it was also necessary to compile county level annual emissions for these records. In addition, because these point SCCs are also associated with the Miscellaneous Finished Metals Surface Coating area source category, it was necessary to compile county

- level annual emissions for all point source records with these SCCs that are not associated with SI C code 3531.

The county

- level point source annual emissions were then subtracted from the area source category annual emissions using an area source category

- to

- point source category crosswalk developed for this project. Note that in keeping with EIIP gu idance, when the resulting area source emission estimate was negative, the area source emission value was set to zero. In addition, when the PM10

- PRI emission estimate resulted in a zero value, then the companion

### 7 

## PM25

- PRI emission estimate was set to zero for consistency. In addition to setting PM25

- PRI
emissions to zero when PM10

- PRI emissions were zero, we also set PM25

- PRI emissions to
PM10

- PRI emissions when PM25

- PRI emissions were greater than PM10

- PRI emissions, after the point source subtractions w ere performed. Finally, the summer and winter season work weekday emission estimates were updated by multiplying the revised annual emission estimate by the appropriate winter season and/or summer season work weekday allocation factors. The following pre sents sample point source NO
x 

## emission subtraction calculations for the Commercial/Institutional Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal Combustion category (SCC 2103002000).



# ( ) ( )

( ) ( )

tons tons

tons SCC for Emissions NOx Source Area ) (SCC tons

. ) (SCC tons

. Cnty Allegheny Emissions NOx Source Po year per tons Cnty Allegheny SCC for Emissions NOx Total Emissions NOx Po Emissions NOx Total SCC for Emissions NOx Source Area

9997

. 895 3028

. 158 3025

. 054

, 1 2103002000 10300208 2277 6 10300207 0751 152 ) ( int 3025

. 054

, 1 ) ( 2103002000 int 2103002000

= − = + = = − =



## The following individual sections describe the annual and seasona l emission estimation methodology for each area source category. Each section contains a brief description of the source category, identifies whether the category’s emission estimates were subject to point source emission subtractions, and presents sample emission calculations (point source subtractions are not included in these sample calculations). All referenced sources are displayed in Appendix A.

### 8 

## Table 1. Area Source Inventory Categories with Point Source Emission Subtractions

SCC SCC1DESC SCC3DESC SCC6DESC SCC8DESC

2102001000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Industrial Anthracite Coal Total: All Boiler Types

2102002000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Industrial Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal Total: All Boiler Types

2103001000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Anthracite Coal Total: All Boiler Types

2103002000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal Total: All Boiler Types

2103004000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Com mercial/Institutional Distillate Oil Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2103005000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Residual Oil Total: All Boiler Types

2103006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Natural Ga s Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2103007000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion Commercial/Institutional Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Total: All Combustor Types

2302050000 Industrial Processes Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20 Bakery Products Total

230207 0001 Industrial Processes Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20 Fermentation/Beverages Breweries

2401015000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Factory Finished Wood: SIC 2426 thru 242 Total: All Solvent Types

2401020000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating W ood Furniture: SIC 25 Total: All Solvent Types

2401025000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Metal Furniture: SIC 25 Total: All Solvent Types

2401040000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Metal Cans: SIC 341 Total: All Solvent Types

2401050000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Miscellaneous Finished Metals: SIC 34

- (341 + 3498) Total: All Solvent Types

2401055000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Machinery and Equipment: SIC 35 Total: All Solvent Types

2401060000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coat ing Large Appliances: SIC 363 Total: All Solvent Types

2401070000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Motor Vehicles: SIC 371 Total: All Solvent Types

2401080000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Marine: SIC 373 Total: All Solvent Types

2401085000 Sol vent Utilization Surface Coating Railroad: SIC 374 Total: All Solvent Types

2401090000 Solvent Utilization Surface Coating Miscellaneous Manufacturing Total: All Solvent Types

2415200000 Solvent Utilization Degreasing All Industries: Conveyerized Degreas ing Total: All Solvent Types

2415300000 Solvent Utilization Degreasing All Industries: Cold Cleaning Total: All Solvent Types

2420000370 Solvent Utilization Dry Cleaning All Processes Special Naphthas

2425000000 Solvent Utilization Graphic Arts All Proc esses Total: All Solvent Types

2501060053 Storage and Transport Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage Gasoline Service Stations Stage 1: Balanced Submerged Filling

2501060101 Storage and Transport Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage Gasoline Servic e Stations Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled

2501060102 Storage and Transport Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage Gasoline Service Stations Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled

2601010000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery On

- site Inciner ation Industrial Total

2601020000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery On

- site Incineration Commercial/Institutional Total

2620030000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery Landfills Municipal Total

2630020010 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery Landfills Wastewater Treatment Processes Total

### 9 

## AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION

– ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
Emissions from livestock production come from such activities as confinement, manure handling and storage, and land application of manure. Biogenic emission source calculations were derived from EPA’s BEIS inventory system.

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION

– CROPS (Fertilizer Application) (14 SCCs)
(Anhydrous Ammonia SCC 2801700001, Aqueous Ammonia SCC 2801700002, Nitrogen Solutions SCC 2801700003, Urea SCC 2801700004, Ammo nium Nitrate SCC 2801700005, Ammonium Sulfate SCC 2801700006, Ammonium Thiosulfate SCC 2801700007, N

- P

- K (multi

- grade nutrient fertilizers) SCC 2801700010, Calcium Ammonium Nitrate SCC 2801700011, Potassium Nitrate SCC 2801700012, Diammonium Phosphate SCC 2801700013, Monoammonium Phosphate SCC 2801700014, Liquid Ammonium Polyphosphate SCC 2801700015, Misc. Fertilizers SCC 2801700099)

Emissions from crops are primarily due to spreading of various fertilizers. Fertilizers spread on
fields that contribute to ammonia emissions include anhydrous ammonia, aqueous ammonia, nitrogen solutions, urea, ammonium nitrate, calcium ammonia, and ammonium sulfate. Biogenic emission source calculations were derived from EPA’s BEIS inventory system.

ARCHITECTURAL SURFACE C OATING (SCC 2401001000)

Architectural surface coatings are used by homeowners and painting contractors to coat the interior and exterior of buildings and other structures. The coatings are applied by spray, brush, or roller and dry or cure at ambient cond itions. The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evaporation of the paint and cleanup solvents. Each county’s emissions are calculated using a per capita emission factor and U.S. Bureau of the Census 2002 population
data. The Federal architectural surface coating regulations call for a 20 percent reduction in the solvent content of architectural surface coatings manufactured after September 1999. 5 

## Therefore, a 20 percent CE is applied in the 2002 inventory.

The emission factor that i s used in this effort differs from that used for the 1999 area source inventory. The new per capita emission factor was calculated using the Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) methods for this category. National solvent

- and water

- based
coatin g per capita use factors were first calculated from 2002 national paint shipments 6 

## and 2002 national population data. 7 

## These factors were then combined with information on the average volatile organic compound (VOC) content of these coatings to calculate per capita emission
factors as follows:

Water

- Based = 0.74 pounds VOC/gallon 8 6 

## × 589,527,000 gallons /288,368,698 people 7 

## = 1.5128 pounds VOC/person/year

Solvent

- Based = 3.87 pounds VOC/gallon 8 

## × 119,914,000 gallons 6 

## /288,368,698 people 7 

## = 1.6093 pounds VOC/person/year

### 10 

## Final composite emission factor = 1.5128 + 1.6093 = 3.1 221 pounds VOC/person/year

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:



# ( ) ( )      

⋅ ⋅ − = 100 100 100 1 RE RP CE Population Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual



## where:

Emission Factor = 3.1221 lbs VOC/person/year Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County) 7


## CE (Control Efficiency) = 20% 5


## RP (Rule Penetration) = 100% RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 100%



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per pounds Emissions VOC Annual people
year person lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

9069

. 1585 2000

1 823

. 813

, 171

, 3 100 100

100 100

100 20 1 904

, 269

, 1 1221

. 3

=        

⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor
Summer work weekd ay allocation factor = 0.00356 9


### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 1585.9069 × 0.00356 = 5.6484 tons VOC per day



## ASPHALT PAVING (2 SCCs)

There are two types of asphalt used for road paving and repair: cutback asphalt and emulsified asphalt. VOC emiss ions result primarily from the curing of the applied material. The following sections describe the two types of asphalt and identify the methods used to estimate emissions for each type.

Cutback Asphalt (SCC 2461021000)

Cutback asphalt is used as a pave ment sealant, a tack coat, and a bonding agent between layers of paving material. Cutback asphalt is prepared by blending or “cutting back” asphalt cement with various blends of petroleum distillates. Emissions from cutback asphalt paving occur during th e curing of the road surface when petroleum distillates evaporate.

Annual VOC emissions from cutback asphalt paving were computed from information obtained from the Pennsylvania Association of Asphalt Material Applicators (PAMA) on the amount of

### 11 

## cutback a sphalt applied in 2002 and the VOC content and density of the asphalt. 10 

## In addition, it was assumed that 100 percent of cutback asphalt contained diluent and that 70 percent of the diluent evaporates. 11 

## County emissions were estimated by multiplying State emissions by the ratio of the each county’s bituminous paved lane mileage by the State’s bituminous paved lane mileage. 12 

## Based on the State regulation prohibiting use of cutback asphalt during summer months, there are no summer season work weekday emissi ons estimated for cutback asphalt. 13



## Emulsified Asphalt (SCC 2461022000)

Emulsified asphalt is a type of liquefied road surfacing material that is used in some of the same applications as cutback asphalt. However, instead of blending asphalt cement with petroleum distillates, emulsified asphalt uses a blend of water with an emulsifier.

Annual VOC emissions from emulsified asphalt paving were computed from information obtained from the Pennsylvania Association of Asphalt Material Applicators on the amoun t of emulsified asphalt applied in 2002, the VOC content and density of the asphalt, and the percentage of emulsified asphalt containing diluent. 10 

## In addition, it was assumed that 100 percent of the
emulsif ied asphalt diluent evaporates. 11 

## County emissions were estimated by multiplying State emissions by the ratio of the each county’s bituminous paved lane mileage by the State’s bituminous paved lane mileage. 14 

## Annual emissions were allocated to the summer season work weekday based on information from PAMA that emulsified asphalt is only applied from March 1 through October 31. 15 

## In addition, it was assumed that asphalt use is evenly distributed during this pe riod and that paving is only performed on weekdays.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:



# ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

Miles Lane Paved Bituminous State Miles Lane Paved Bituminous County

x emissions VOC Statewide ns VOCEmissio Annual County g Evaporatin Diluent of Use Asphalt State Factor Emission Emissions Annual Statewide Density VOC Content VOC Factor Emission

= = =

% 2002



## where: Cutback Asphalt VOC Content = 35% 10


## Emulsified Asphalt VOC Content = 8% 10


## Cutback Asphalt VOC Density = 7.1 lbs/gallon 10


## Emulsified Asphalt VOC Density = 6.25 lbs/gallon 10


## 2002 PA Cutback Asphalt Use = 5,000,000 gallons 10


## 2002 PA Emulsified Asphalt Use = 15,000,000 gallons 10


## Bituminous Paved County Lane Miles = 2,538 miles (Allegheny) 14


## Bituminous Paved State Lane Miles = 83,227 miles 14


## % of Cutback Asphalt Diluent that Evaporates = 70% 11 

## % of Emulsified Asphalt Containing Diluent = 50% 10


## % of Emulsified Asphalt Diluent that Evaporates = 100% 11

### 12 

## Cutback Asphalt VOC Emissions Calculation :

year per VOC tons Emissions VOC Annual miles miles asphalt cutback gallons million
year gallon VOC tons

Emissions VOC Annual year per gallon per VOC tons lbs ton

year gallon VOC lbs

Factor Emission

6147

. 132 227

, 83 538

, 2 7

. 0 5 0012425

. 0 0012425

. 0 2000

1 1

. 7

35

. 0

= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = = ⋅ ⋅ =



### (Summer work weekday emi ssions are estimated as zero due to State prohibition on use during this period) 13



## Emulsified Asphalt VOC Emissions Calculation :

year per VOC tons Emissions VOC Annual miles miles asphalt emulsified gallons million
year gallon VOC tons

Emissions VOC Annual year per gallon per VOC tons lbs ton

year gallon VOC lbs

Factor Emission

1780

. 57 227

, 83 538

, 2 5

. 0 15 00025

. 0 00025

. 0 2000

1 25

. 6

08

. 0

= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = = ⋅ ⋅ =



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emiss ions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 3/8 (fraction of paving performed in the summer months) × 5/7 (fraction of paving performed on weekdays) ÷ 65 (number of weekdays in the summer) = 0.004125 15



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 57.1780 × 0.004125 = 0.2359 tons VOC per day



## AUTOMOTIVE REFINISHING (SCC 2401005000)

Automotive refinishing is the painting of worn or damaged automobiles, light trucks, and other
vehi cles. The coating of new cars, however, is considered in the point source inventory, and therefore not included in this inventory. The automotive refinishing VOC emission factor of 2.30 lb/person is based on EPA guidance. 16 

## A control efficiency of 60.94 p ercent for 2002 was computed by applying an incremental reduction of 38 percent 17 

## to 1999’s 37 percent 18 

## control efficiency based on the following calculation:

Efficiency Control Efficiency Control Efficiency Control Efficiency Control l Incrementa Efficiency Control

% 94

. 60 100 100 37 1 100 38 1 1 2002 100 100 1999 1 100 2002 1 1 2002

= ⋅              

−      

− − = ⋅              

−      

− − =



## SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

### 13 

# ( ) ( )      

⋅ ⋅ − = 100 100 100 1 RE RP CE Population Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual



## where:

E mission Factor =2.30 lbs VOC/person/year 16


## Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County) 7


## Control Efficiency = 60.94% 17 18



## Rule Penetration = 100% Rule Effectiveness = 100%



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per pounds Emissions VOC Annual people
year person lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

4282

. 570 2000

1 856

, 140

, 1 100 100

100 100

100

94

. 60 1 904

, 269

, 1 30

. 2

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00385 9 

### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 570.4282 × 0.00385 = 2.1940 tons VOC per day



## BAKERIES (SCC 2302050000)

Bakery emissions, primarily ethanol, result from yeast fermentation during the baking process of bread and bakery products. Ethanol is emitted through a vent with any combustion product gases.
Relevant NAICS codes for bakeries are 311811 and 311812.

County

- level VOC emissions were calculated using an employment

- based emission factor and
the number of NAICS code 311811 and 311 812 employees in each county. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 3 

## T he Bakeries emission factor is 0.11 tons VOC/employee/year

. 19 

## Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from
these em ission estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Employees)

where: Emission Factor = 0.11 tons VOC /employee/year 19 

## Employees = 1024 2 3 

## (Allegheny County)

### 14 

### ) 1024 ( 11

. 0

employees
year employee VOC tons

Emissions VOC Annual   

 

  

 

= 

## = 112.64 tons VOC per year

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocat ion factor=0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 112.64 × 0.00275 = 0.3098 tons VOC per day



## BREWERIES (SCC 2302070001)

Emissions of VOCs from breweries result from compounds such as ethanol, myrcene, e thyl acetate and higher alcohols resulting from the brewing process. There are two brewery emission factors, which differ based on facility production size (i.e., a smaller emission factor is used for facilities with more than 60,000 barrels production, a nd a larger factor for facilities producing 60,000 barrels or less).

Because facility

- level brewery production data were not available, it was necessary to estimate the amount of production in each county associated with small and large facilities. First , county

level beer production was estimated by apportioning State

- level production to counties based on
county

- level brewery employment. Total Pennsylvania beer production was obtained from the
Federal Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. 20

2 

## The numb er of brewery (NAICS code 31212) employees in 2002 was estimated by projecting 2001 county employment, obtained from
the 2001 County Business Patterns, to 2002 based on the 2002 to 2001 State

- level brewery

e mployment ratio, obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 3



## Based on the average Pennsylvania brewery production per employee (2,122 barrels) calculated from the data described above, it was assumed that all facilities in a county reporting fewer than 29 employees would contain only small breweries. The cutoff of 29 employees was chosen based on the observation that, assuming a constant per employee production rate, a brewery with 29 employees would prod uce approximately 61,500 barrels of beer. It was also assumed that a county with more than 29 brewery employees would have production by both small and large facilities. In lieu of actual data, it was assumed that 1 percent of these counties’ production is from small breweries, and 99 percent is from large breweries. Therefore, the small brewery emission factor was applied to 1 percent of the county’s beer production, while the large brewery emission factor was applied to 99 percent of the county’s produ ction. This 1 percent assumption appears reasonable given that this value results in statewide brewery emissions similar to those
estimated for 1996.

Since Pennsylvania’s brewery production data were available on a monthly basis, the statewide

summer mon th allocation factor was calculated using the ratio of summer beer production to the annual beer production. This was then converted to the summer work weekday allocation factor using weekday temporal allocation data from EPA’s Emissions Modeling Clearing house (EMCH). 4 20

### 15 

## SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:



# ( ) ( )        

= Employees State Employees County Production Statewide Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual

where: Small Brewery Emission Factor = 56.743 pounds of VOC/1000 barrels 21


## Larg e Brewery Emission Factor = 4.16791 pounds of VOC/1000 barrels 22


## Adams County Employees = 7 2 3


## Allegheny County Employees = 261 2 3


## 2002 PA Beer Production = 3,089,646 barrels 20



## Adams County (Small Breweries Only Assumption) Annual VOC Emissions :

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC lbs Emissions VOC Annual Employees State Employees County barrels barrels VOC lbs Emissions VOC Annual

4214

. 0 2000

1 8634

. 842 456

, 1 7 646

, 089

, 3 1000

743

. 56

= ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ =

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month beer production/annual beer production × weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer Summer work weekday all ocation factor = 856,549/3,089,646 × 0.715/65 = 0.00305 4 20


### Summer work weekday allocation factor=0.00305 Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.4214 × 0.00305 = 0.001285 tons VOC per day



## Allegheny County (Small and Large Breweries Assumption) Annual VOC Emissions :

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC lbs Emissions VOC Annual Employees State Employees County barrels barrels VOC lbs Employees State Employees County barrels barrels VOC lbs Emissions VOC Annual

2998

. 1 2000

1 5583

. 2599 456

, 1 261 646

, 089

, 3 1000

168

. 4 99

. 0 456

, 1 261 646

, 089

, 3 1000

743

. 56 01

. 0

= ⋅ =        

⋅ ⋅ ⋅ +        

⋅ ⋅ ⋅ =

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocatio n factor = summer month beer production/annual beer production × weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer Summer work weekday allocation factor = 856,549/3,089,646 × 0.715/65 = 0.00305 4 20


### Summer work weekday allocation factor=0.00305 Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 1.2998 × 0.00305 = 0.00396 tons VOC per day

### 16 

## COAL COMBUSTION (6 SCCs)

(Residential Anthracite SCC 2104001000, Residential Bituminous SCC 21040 02000, Commercial/Institutional Anthracite SCC 2103001000, Commercial/Institutional Bituminous SCC 2103002000, Industrial Anthracite SCC 2102001000, Industrial Bituminous SCC 2102002000)

This category covers emissions from the burning of coal by residenti al, and small commercial and industrial users. Coal combustion emissions were estimated for VOC, NO
x 

## , CO, Pb, PM, and
SO 2



## .

Residential coal consumption, in tons per dwelling unit, was estimated using the following equation:

Coal consumption per dwelling unit = 0.003874 e (7.6414

- (1000/heating degree days))



## Heating Degree Day (HDD) data were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. 23



## After estimating county

- level residential coal consumption per unit, emissions were calculated by multiplying these values by the number of coal

- burning dwelling units in each county The HDD of each county was assigned according to the town or city in the county or the nearest to wn or city of similar latitude for which data were available.

24 

## and the

em ission factor for each pollutant.

Year 2002 Commonwealth

- level commercial sector coal consumption (computed from the Energy Information Administration’s State Energy Data 2000 25 

## and Annual Coal Report 2002 26

2 

## ) was allocated to individual counties using the n umber of commercial sector facilities in each
county. County

- level emissions were then calculated by multiplying county coal consumption by the emission factor for the applicable CAP.

Industrial coal

- burni ng emissions were computed in a similar way to commercial/institutional emissions. However, county

- level industrial employment data (from County Business Patterns
and Current Employment Statistics ) were used to allocate coal consumption to individual

coun ties.

In some cases, CAP emission factors differ between anthracite and bituminous coal. Because anthracite is mined in the eastern half of the Commonwealth, while bituminous is mined in the western half, the emission calculations assume that eastern cou nties burn anthracite coal while
western counties burn bituminous coal.

For Commercial and Industrial sector categories, point source emissions, where present, were
subtracted from these initial emission estimates.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

### 17 

## Residential Coal Combustion :


# ( ) ( )

( ) ( )       ⋅ =

− 

## Units Dwelling Burning

- Coal e Units Dwelling Burning

- Coal of Number applicable if Content Ash Percent Factor Emission Pollutant Emissions Annual

HDD 

## 003874

. 0 ,

1000 6414

. 7



## where: VOC Emission Factor = 10 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 27

39 

## ; 10 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year

NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 3 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 27 

## ; 9.1 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39


## CO Emission Factor = 275 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 27 

## ; 275 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39


## Pb Emission Factor = 0.013182 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39



## PM10

- FIL Emission Factor = 10 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 27 

## ; 6.2 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39



## PM25

- FIL Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 27 

## × 13.38% ash

content =8.028 lbs/ton anthracite coal/y ear; 3.8 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39



## PM

- CON Emission Factor = 0.08 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 27 

## × 13.38% ash content =1.0704 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 1 .04 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39



## SO 2 

## Emission Factor = 39 lbs/ton anthracite coal/ year 27 

## × 0.89% sulfur content =34.71 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 31 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39 

## × 2.42% sulfur content = 75.02 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year Anthracite Coal Sulfur Content = 0.89% sulfur 27


## Bituminous Coal Sulfur Conten t = 2.42% sulfur 27



## Anthracite Coal Ash Content = 13.38% ash 27


## Number of Coal

- Burning Dwelling Units (Allegheny County) = 183 24



## e = natural base HDD = Heating Degree Days (Allegheny County) = 5,494 23



## VOC Emissions :



# ( ) ( )

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual unit dwelling coal tons e units dwelling
year coal ton VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

1539

. 6 2000 1 7791

. 307

, 12 003874

. 0 183 10

5494 1000 6414

. 7



### = ⋅ =  
 

 
 

   

 

   

 

= −



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.000110 4 23 

### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 6.1539 × 0.000110 = 0.000675 tons VOC per day

### 18 

## CO Emissions :



# ( ) ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual unit dwelling coal tons e units dwelling
year coal tons CO lbs

Emissions CO Annual

2320

. 169 2000

1 9245

. 463

, 338 003874

. 0 183 275

5494 1000 6414

. 7



### = ⋅ =    

   

  

 

  

 

= −



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.000110 4 23 

### Summer work weekday CO emi ssions = 169.2320 × 0.000110 = 0.01856 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor=0.00555 4 23 

### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 169.2320 × 0.00555 = 0.9389 tons CO per day



## Commercial/Institutional Coal Combustion :



# ( ) ( )        

= Facilities State of Number Facilities County of Number

n Consumptio Coal Factor Emission Pollutant Emissions Annual



## where: VOC Emission Factor = 0.07 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 28

39 

## ; 1.3 lbs/ton
bitum inous coal/year

NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 18 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 39 

## ; 33 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39



## CO Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 39 

## ; 11 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39


## Pb Emission Factor = 0.0089 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 39 

## ; 0.013182 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39



## SO 2 

## Emission Factor =39 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 39 

## × 0.89% sulfur content

= 34.7 1 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 38 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39 

## × 2.42% sulfur content = 91.96 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year

PM10

- FIL Emission Factor = 2.3 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 39 

## × 13.38% ash content = 30.774 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 13.2 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39



## PM25

- FIL Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 39 

## × 13.38% ash content = 8.028 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year; 4.6 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39



## PM

- CON Emission Factor = 0.08 lbs/ton anthracite coal/year 39 

## × 13.38% ash
content = 1.0704 lbs/ton anthracite coal/ year ; 1.04 lbs/ton bituminous coal/year 39

### 19 

## Anthracite Coal Sulfur Content = 0.89% 27



## B ituminous Coal Sulfur Content = 2.42% 27



## Anthracite Coal Ash Content = 13.38% ash 27


## Pennsylvania Coal Consumption = 512,636 tons 25 26


## Number of County Facilities (Allegheny County) = 24,654 2


## Number of Pennsylvania Facilities = 197,795 2



## Commercial/Institutional Coal Consumption : 25 26



### tons tons tons tons n Consumptio Commercial n Consumptio Coal State

636

, 512 000

, 742 000

, 587 000

, 648 n Consumptio l Residentia and Commercial 2000 n Consumptio l Residentia and Commercial 2002 2000

= ⋅ = ⋅ =



## VOC Emissions :

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual facilities state facilities county tons year coal

bituminous ton VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

5331

. 41 2000

1 2561

. 066

, 83 795

, 197 654

, 24 636

, 512 3

. 1

= ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ =



### Summer work weekday VOC emission s = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00170 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 41.5331 × 0.00170 = 0.0705 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual facilities state facilities county tons year coal

bituminous ton CO lbs

Emissions CO Annual

4342

. 351 2000

1 321

. 868

, 702 795

, 197 654

, 24 636

, 512 11

= ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ =



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00170 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 351 .4342 × 0.00170 = 0.5967 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00397 4



### Winter work weekday C O emissions = 351.4342 × 0.00397 = 1.3962 tons CO per day



## Industrial Coal Combustion :

### 20 

# ( ) ( )        

= Employees State of Number Employees County of Number

n Consumptio Coal Factor Emission Pollutant Emissions Annual



## The Industrial Coal Combustion emissions were calculated using the same emission factors as Commercial/Institutional Coal (see above).

where: Number of Allegheny County Employees =48,544 2 3


## Number of Pennsylvania Employees = 721,902 2 3


## Pennsylvania Coal Consumption = 42,900,812.75 tons 25 26



## Industrial Coal Consumption : 25 26



### tons tons tons tons Report) Coal nnual A n Consumptio Industrial Other Report) Coal (Annual n Consumptio Industrial Other Data Energy State from n Consumptio Industrial n Consumptio Coal State

75

. 812

, 900

, 42 000

, 498

, 3 000

, 121

, 3 000

, 083

, 48 ( 2000 2002 2000

= ⋅ = ⋅ =



## CO Emissions :

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual state in employees county in employees tons year coal

bituminous ton CO lbs

Emissions CO Annual

6603

. 866

, 15 2000

1 58

. 320

, 733

, 31 902

, 721 544

, 48 75

. 812

, 900

, 42 11

= ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ =



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00283 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 15,866.6603 × 0.00283 = 44.8538 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor

Winter work weekda y allocation factor = 0.00283 4


## Winter work weekday CO emissions = 15,866.6603 × 0.00283 = 44.8538 tons CO per day

COMMERCIAL AND CONSUMER SOLVENT USE (SCC 2465000000)

This source category covers household p roducts such as special naphthas, alcohols, carbonyls, and other organics that contain VOCs. There are no point sources associated with this category. County

- level emissions were calculated using a composite per capita emission factor (see table below) a nd U.S. Bureau of the Census population data. The emission factor represents pre

control emission rates. A CE of 20 percent 29 9 

## and an RP of 48.6 percent were applied to reflect the Federal Rule for consumer products. This yields a post

- control VOC emission factor of

### 21 

## 7.078 lbs per capita which was used in all emission calculations. Each county’s emissions are estimated per the sample calculations listed below.

SUBCATEGORY EMISSION FACTOR

Household Products 0.79 lbs/person /year
Personal Care Products 2.32 lbs/person/year
Automotive Aftermarket Products 1.36 lbs/person/year
Adhesives and Sealants 0.57 lbs/person/year

FIFRA

- Regulated Products 1.78 lbs/person/year Coatings and Related Products 0.95 lbs/person/year
Miscel laneous Products 0.07 lbs/person/year Total (Pre

- Control) 7.84 lbs/person/year

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:



# ( ) ( )      

⋅ ⋅ − = 100 100 100 1 RE RP CE Population Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual



## where: Emission Factor =7.84 lbs VOC/person/year 30


## Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County) 7


## CE (Control Efficiency) = 20% 29 

## RP (Rule Penetration) = 48.6% 9 

## RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 100%



## ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual people
year person VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

1598

. 4494 2000

1 557

. 319

, 988

, 8 100 100

100 6

. 48

100 20 1 904

, 269

, 1 84

. 7

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −   

 

  

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00274 9 

### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 4494.1598 × 0.00274 = 12.3128 tons VOC per day



## COMMERCIAL COOKING (5 SCCs)

Chain

- Dri ven (Conveyorized) Charbroilers SCC 2302002100; Under

- Fired Charbroilers SCC 2302002200; Flat Griddles SCC 2302002300; Clamshell Griddles SCC 2302002400; and Deep

Fat Fryers SCC 2302002500

Criteria pollutant annual emissions associated with commercial coo king were compiled from the 2002 nonpoint source National Emissions Inventory (NEI). 31 

## The 2002 NEI reports commercial cooking emissions in five SCCs, each of which represents a specific equipment type. Source

### 22 

## categories comprise emissions from all meat t ypes for a particular piece of equipment. The following types of meat are included: hamburger, steak, fish, pork, and chicken. Emissions for deep

- fat frying of french fries were also estimated. With the exception of deep

- fat frying of french fries, comm ercial cooking activity was developed from survey data obtained from a Public Research Institute (PRI) report on charbroiling activity estimation in the State of California. 32

31 

## Further details on the annual emission estimation methodology are available in t he forthcoming 2002 nonpoint source NEI documentation.

The NEI reports emissions for the following criteria pollutants: VOC, CO, PM10

- PRI, and
PM25

- PRI (note, however, that each pollutant is not reported for each equipme nt type). The sources of the commercial cooking criteria pollutant emission factors are documented in a report prepared for EPA. 33



## Because temporal allocation data were not developed for this category in the 2002 NEI, the default temporal data reported in the EMCH for SCC 2302002000 (Commercial Charbroiling) were applied to each commercial cooking SCC. 4 

## These data were used to estimate both summer season and winter season work weekday emission estimates.

SA MPLE SEASONAL CALCULATIONS (CHAIN

- DRIVEN CHARBROILERS):

Annual VOC emissions (Allegheny County) = 10.7792 tons VOC per year Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation fact or = 0.00275 4


## Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 10.7792 × 0.00275 = 0.0296 tons VOC per day

Annual PM10

- PRI emissions (Allegheny County) = 43.0837 tons VOC per year Winter work weekday PM10

- PRI emissions = annual PM10

- PRI emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4


## Winter work weekday PM10

- PRI emissions = 43.0837 × 0.00275 = 0.1185 tons VOC per day

COMPOST ING (3 SCCs)
(Biosolids SCC 2680001000, Mixed Waste 2680002000, Green Waste 2680030000) Composting refers to the use of both aerobic and anaerobic microbial processes to degrade waste materials for beneficial refuse. Compostable wastes include biosolids ( sewage sludge), manure, green waste ( e.g., landscape trimmings, grass clippings), and other biodegradable materials such as food waste. Composting produces emissions of NH 3 

## , VOC, and methane. Emissions for each county were estimated using a biosolids

- gene ration

- based emission factor 65 

## . Figures on material composted were obtained from BioCycle’s nationwide survey 34



## Each county’s emissions were estimated per the sample calculations below.

SAMPLE NH 3 

## EMISSION CAL CULATION:

### 23 

## Annual NH 3 

## Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Tons material composted)
Where:

Emissions Factor = 3.28 lbs NH 3 

## /ton Biosolids
2.81 lbs NH 3 

## /ton Mixed Waste
0.82 lbs NH 3 

## /ton Green Waste Tons Biosolids = 3,321.65 (Allegheny County)



# ( ) Biosolids tons year Biosolids ton NH lbs Emissions NH Annual 65

. 321

, 3 / 3 28

. 3 3      

=

Annual NH 3 

## Emissions = 10895.012 * lbs ton

2000

1 

## = 5.45 tons NH 3 

## / year

DEGREASING (4 SCCs)

(Auto Repair (Cold Cleaning) SCC 2415360000, Manufacturing (Cold Cleaning) SCC 2415300000, Elec tronics (Vapor/In

- Line) SCC 2415230000, Other (Vapor/In

- Line) SCC 2415200000)

Surface cleaning, also known as “degreasing”, includes the solvent cleaning or conditioning of metal surfaces and parts, fabricated plastics, electronic and electrical component s and other nonporous substrates. These cleaning processes are designed to remove foreign material, such as oils, grease, waxes and moisture, usually in the preparation for further treatment, such as painting, electroplating, galvanizing, anodizing or app lying conversion coatings. Three basic types of surface cleaning operations are currently used: cold cleaning, vapor cleaning, and in

- line or conveyorized cleaning, which can be either a cold or vapor cleaning process. VOC emission results from the evapo ration of solvents used in these processes.

Cold cleaning is a batch process in which solvents are applied at room temperature or slightly heated. Parts are immersed in a solvent, usually mineral spirits. Parts too large for immersion may be sprayed or wiped with a solvent. The primary cold cleaning application is cleaning of tools or metal parts at service and automotive repair stations and manufacturing facilities. Cold cleaning may incorporate covers or freeboards to limit the evaporative loss of so lvents.

In

- line cleaners use automated load systems (typically conveyors) to maintain a continuous feed to the cleaning unit. These units use both cold and vapor

- cleaning methods as described above, with the majority being halogenated solvent cleaning sy stems. These units are used for large

- scale operations and are usually enclosed except to the conveyor inlet or exit. A common application of
in

- line cleaners is cleaning printed circuit boards for the electronic and electrical component
industries.

The Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) developed the following population

- based methods for estimating degreasing emissions. Point source emissions, where present, were
subtracted from these emission estimates.

### 24 

## SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:



# ( ) ( )      

⋅ ⋅ − = 100 100 100 1 RE RP CE Population Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual



## where: Auto Repair (Cold Cleaning) VOC Emission Factor = 2.5 lbs VOC/person/year 35


## Manufacturing (Cold Cleaning) VOC Emission Factor = 1.1 lbs VOC/person/year 35


## Electronics (Vapor/I n

- Line) VOC Emission Factor = 0.21 lbs VOC/person/year 35


## Other (Vapor/In

- Line) VOC Emission Factor = 0.49 lbs VOC/person/year 35


## Population = 1,269,904 (Alleghen y County) 7


## Auto Repair Cold Cleaning CE (Control Efficiency) = 66% 36 

## Manufacturing Cold Cleaning CE (Control Efficiency) = 66% 36 

## Electronics Vapor/In

- Line CE (Control Efficiency ) = 63% 36 37 

## Other Vapor/In

- Line CE (Control Efficiency) = 63% 36 37 

## All Categories RP (Rule Penetration) = 100% All Categories RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 80%

A llegheny County Auto Repair (Cold Cleaning) VOC Emissions Calculation :



# ( )

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual people
year person VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

2434

. 749 2000 1 72

. 486

, 498

, 1 100 80

100 100

100 66 1 904

, 269

, 1 5

. 2

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −   

 

  

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions calculation for Allegheny County Auto Repair (Cold Cleaning): Degreasing (all categories) summer work weekday allocation fact or = 0.00385 9 

### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 749.2434 × 0.00385 = 2.8817 tons VOC per day



## DRY CLEANERS (SCC 2420000370)

Three types of dry cleaning operations are used: coin

- operated facilities using perchloroethylene (perc); commercial/industrial facilities using perc; and commercial/industrial facilities using VOC solvents. As perc is no longer considered a VOC, only co mmercial/industrial facilities using VOC solvents are considered for the area source inventory. The first two categories are not included in the baseline inventory. They are, however, retained for use in the modeling inventory as required by EPA guidance

.

### 25 

## Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates. Each county’s emissions were estimated per the sample calculations below using a per capita emission factor and US Census Bureau population data. The emission fact or was determined by the Department using 1990 survey data supplied by the industry (contacts with the Pennsylvania and Delaware Cleaners Association indicate that more recent data are not available). 38



## SAMP LE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Population)

where: Emission Factor = 0.15 lbs VOC/person/year 38


## Population = 1,269,904 (2002 Allegheny County) 7



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual people
year person lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

2428

. 95 2000

1 6

. 485

, 190 904

, 269

, 1 15

. 0

= ⋅ =   

 

  

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0028 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 95.2428 × 0.0028=0.2674 to ns VOC per day



## ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES (SCC 2401060000)

The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evaporation of the solvent used in the coating process in the manufacture of electrical appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, laundry e quipment, and electric housewares. Emissions for each county were estimated per the sample calculations below using an employment

- based emission factor and the number of employees in the NAICS codes, 333414, 335211, 335212, 335221, and 335228. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the B ureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)

. 3 

## Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number o f Employees)

where: Emission Factor = 463 lbs VOC/employee/year 16 

## Employees = 150 (Allegheny County) 2 3

### 26 

# ( )

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual employees
year employee lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

725

. 34 2000 1 450

, 69 150

463

= ⋅ =   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4


### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 34.725 x 0.00275=0.09 55 tons VOC per day



## ELECTRICAL INSULATION (SCC 2401065000)

The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evaporation of the solvent used in the insulation coatings applied to wire and cable. The emissions for each county were calculated

us ing an employment

- based emission factor and the number of employees in NAICS codes 331422, 331491, 335311, 335921 and 335929

. The number of employees in each county for
2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)

. 3 

## E ach county’s emissions were estima ted per the sample
calculations below.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where: Emission Factor = 290 lbs VOC/employee/year 16 

## Employees = 58 (Allegheny County ) 2 3



# ( )

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual employees
year employee lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

41

. 8 2000 1 16820 58

290

= ⋅ =   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation f actor = 0.00277 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 8.41 × 0.00277=0.0233 tons VOC per day

### 27 

## FACTORY FINISHED WOOD (SCC 2401015000)

The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evaporation of t he solvent used in the gluing and coating process. The emissions for each county were calculated using an employment

- based emission factor and the number of employees in NAICS codes 32192, 33711, 321211, 321212, 321213, 321911, 321918, 321992, and 321999. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtain ed from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)

. 3 

## Point source emissions, where present, were
subtracted from these emission estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Facto r)(Number of Employees)

where: Emission Factor = 131 lbs VOC/employee/year 16 

## Employees =615 (Allegheny County) 2 3



# ( )

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual employees
year employee lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

2825

. 40 2000 1 80565 615

131

= ⋅ =   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0028 4


### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 40.2825 x 0.00 28=0.1141 tons VOC per day



## FOREST FIRES (SCC 2810001000)

Forest fires in certain rural areas can produce very large, short

- term emissions of VOC, NO
x 

## , and CO, SO 2 

## , and particulates. The emissions for each county were calculated using an emission
factor from AP

- 42 39 

## or the 1999 National Emissions Inventory 40

39 

## and a loading factor from AP

42

. The number of acres burned was obtained from the Department of Conservation and
Natural Resources. 41 

## Each county’s emissions were estimated per the sample calculations below.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

Annual Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Loading Factor)(Acres Burned)

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 24 lbs VOC/ton of flora/ye ar 39

### 28 

## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 4 lbs NO
x 

## /ton of flora/year 39


## CO Emission Factor = 140 lbs CO/ton of flora/year 39



## Loa ding Factor = 11 tons of flora/acre 39



## Acres Burned = 3.85 acres (Westmoreland County) 41



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual burned acres
acre flora

of tons

year flora of ton VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

5082

. 0 2000

1 4

. 1016 85

. 3 11 24

= ⋅ =         

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0055 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.5082 × 0.0055=0.002795 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :



# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual burned acres
acre flora

of tons

year flora of ton CO lbs

Emissions CO Annual

9645

. 2 2000

1 5929 85

. 3 11 140

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0055 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 2.9645 × 0.0055=0.0163 tons CO per day

Winter work we ekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00056 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 2.9645 × 0.00056=0.0017 tons CO per day



## FUE L OIL COMBUSTION (3 SCCs)

(Residential Distillate Fuel Oil SCC 2104004000, Commercial/Institutional Distillate Fuel Oil SCC 2103004000, Commercial/Institutional Residual Fuel Oil SCC 2103005000)

Distillate and residual oil combustion sources, which emit VOC, NO
x 

## , CO, SO 2 

## , Pb, and PM are grouped into three categories: Commercial/Institutional, Residential, and Industrial. Industrial source emissions are captured in the point source inventory. For Commercial sector categories, point source emissions, whe re present, were subtracted from the emissions of the corresponding

### 29 

## county. Fuel oil emissions were calculated for each county using fuel use estimates derived by allocating Commonwealth consumption estimates from the Energy Information Administration

to individual counties . The county allocations were performed using data obtained from the County Business Patterns and the U.S. Census Bureau.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

Residential Distillate Fuel Oil :

Residential fuel oil usage was determined by alloc ating the total residential fuel oil use to each county. The residential fuel oil consumption was allocated by the ratio of dwelling units (DU) using distillate fuel oil in a county to the number of dwelling units burning distillate fuel oil in
the Common wealth. The following is the general equation for the calculation of usage for
residential sources of fuel oil combustion.


## ( )        

= DU Burning

- Oil

- Fuel State DU Burning

- Oil

- Fuel County Usage Oil Fuel Distillate l Residentia PA Usage Oil Fuel Annual



## where: PA Residential Distillate Fuel Use = 829,470 thousands of gallons 42


## 2000 County Fuel

- Oil

- Burning DUs = 8123 Dwelling Units (Allegheny County) 7



## 2000 State Fuel

- Oil

- Burning DUs = 1,217,155 Dwelling Units 7



## VOC E missions :

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual Units Dwelling Units Dwelling gallons of thousands gallons

VOC lbs Emissions VOC Annual

9375

. 1 2000 1 9784

. 3874 155

, 217

, 1 8123 470

, 829 1000

7

. 0

= ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ =



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.000165 4



### Summer work weekday VOC em issions = 1.9375 × 0.000165=0.000319 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :

year per CO tons pounds ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual Units Dwelling Units Dwelling gallons of thousands gallons

VOC lbs Emissions CO Annual

8392

. 13 2000 1 4173

. 678

, 27 155

, 217

, 1 8123 470

, 829 1000

5

= ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ =



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.000165 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 13.8392 × 0.000165=0.00228 tons CO per day

### 30 

### Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.000626 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 13.8392 × 0.00626=0.0866 tons CO per day



## Commercial/Institutional Distillate Fuel Oil :

The total amount of distillate fuel oil was apportioned to each county according to the number of commercial sector (i.e., SIC code 50

- 89) facilities. The number of commercial facilities in 2001 was used for this allocation because 2001 data were the last year available. 2 

## Total
Commonwealth u se was obtained from the Energy Information Administration

. 42 

## Each county’s emissions for commercial/institutional fuel oil combustion were estimated per the following sample calculations.



## ( ) ( )        

= Facilities State of Number Facilities County of Number Use Oil Fuel Distillate nal Institutio Commercial PA Factor Emission Emissions Annual /



## where:
VOC Emission Factor = 0.34 lbs/10 00 gallons/year 39



## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 20 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39


## CO Emission Factor = 5 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## SO 2 

## Emission Factor = 142 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39 

## × 0.3% sulfur content = 42.6 lbs/1000 gallons/year
PM10

- FIL Emission Factor = 1.08 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## P

M25

- FIL Emission Factor = 0.83 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## PM

- CON Emission Factor = 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39


## Lead Emission Factor = 0.001268 lbs/1000 gallons/yea r Error! Bookmark not defined. Distillate Fuel Sulfur Content = 0.3% 27


## County Facilities = 24,654 (Allegheny County) 2


## Commonwealth Facilities = 197,795 2


## PA Commercial/Institutional Distillate Fuel Oil Use = 301,554,000 gallons 42



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual Facilities Facilities gallons of thousands 301,554
year gallons lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

3898

. 6 2000 1 5656

. 779

, 12 795

, 197 654

, 24 1000 34

. 0

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=



### Sum mer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00170 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 6.3898 × 0.00170=0.0108 tons V OC per day



## CO Emissions :

### 31 

# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual Facilities Facilities gallons of thousands 301,554
year gallons lbsCO

Emissions CO Annual

9674

. 93 2000

1 7889

. 934

, 187 795

, 197 654

, 24 1000 5

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00170 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 93.9674 × 0.00170=0.1595 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.0040 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 93.9674 × 0.0040=0.3733 tons CO per day



## Commercial/Institutional Residual Fuel Oil :

The total amount of residual fuel oil was apportioned to each county according to the number of commercial facilities, which was obtain ed from County Business Patterns

. 2 

## The total
Commonwealth use was obtained from the Energy Information Administration

. 42 

## Each county’s
emissions for commercia l/institutional fuel oil combustion were estimated per the following sample calculations.



## ( ) ( )        

= Facilities State of Number Facilities County of Number Factor Emission Emissions Annual Use Oil Fuel Residual Commercial PA



## where: VOC Emission Factor = 1.13 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 55 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39


## CO Emission Factor = 5 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## SO 2 

## Emission Factor = 157 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39 

## × 1.05% sulfur content = 164.85 lbs/1000 gallons/year

PM10

- FIL Emission Factor = 5.17 lbs/1000 gallons/year × 0.19% ash content = 0.9823 lbs/1000 gallons/ year 39



## PM25

- FIL Emission Factor = 1.92 lbs/1000 gallo ns/year × 0.19% ash content = 0.3648 lbs/1000 gallons/ year 39



## PM

- CON Emission Factor = 1.5 lbs/1000 gallons/ year 39


## Lead Emission Factor = 0.00155 lbs/1000 gallon s/ year Error! Bookmark not defined. Residual Fuel Sulfur Content = 1.05% 43


## County Facilities = 24,654 (Allegheny County) 2


## Commonwealth Facilities = 197,795 2



## PA Commercial/Institutional Residual Fuel Oil Use = 16,597,000 gallons 42

### 32 

## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual Facilities Facilities gallons of thousands 16,597
year gallons VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

1688

. 1 2000 1 6534

. 2337 795

, 197 654

, 24 1000 13

. 1

= ⋅ =        

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emi ssions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00170 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 1.1688 × 0.00170= 0.00198 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :



# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual Facilities Facilities gallons of thousands 16,597
year gallons CO lbs

Emissions CO Annual

1718

. 5 2000

1 5991

. 343

, 10 795

, 197 654

, 24 1000 5

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00170 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 5.1718 × 0.00170=0.00 878 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.0040 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 5.1718 × 0.0040 = 0.0205 tons CO per day



## GASOLINE MARKETING (5 SCCs)

(Stage I SCC 2501060053, Stage II Uncontrolled SCC 2501060101, Stage II Controlled SCC 2501060102, Underground Storage Tank Breathing and Emptying SCC 2501060201, Truck Transit SCC 2505030120)

Gasoline marketing involves the operations typically associated with transporting gasoline from refineries to final consumption in gasoline

- powered vehicles. Evaporative emissions of VOCs occur at all points in the distribution process. The operations t hat were inventoried as area sources are gasoline dispensing outlets and gasoline tank trucks in transit. Bulk terminals and outlets are inventoried as point sources. VOC emissions result from the following sources: 1)

### 33 

## Stage I (tank truck unloading into underground storage tanks), 2) Stage II (vehicle fueling), 3) Underground Storage Tank Breathing and Emptying, and 4) Truck Transit.

Each category’s AP

- 42 emission factor is based on the average daily throughput that was calculated from monthly data obta ined from the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue Bureau of Motor Fuel Taxes. The vehicle miles traveled (VMT), which were obtained from Dan Szekeres of the Baker Corporation 44 

## , was used to apportion the gasoline throughput to each county.
Control efficien cy (CE), rule penetration (RP), and rule effectiveness (RE) factors were applied to Stage I for each county to reflect the application of vapor balance systems. A RE factor was applied to Stage II to each regulated county. CE, RP, and RE factors were app lied to Underground Storage Tank Breathing to reflect the application of pressure relief valves. There were no point sources for this source category. Each county’s emissions were estimated per the following sample calculations.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALC ULATIONS:

Stage I : 

# ( ) ( )        

= VMT Annual State VMT Annual County Sales Gasoline Annual State Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual



## where: Emission Factor = 1.92 lbs VOC/1000 gallons 39 

## State Annual Gasoline Sales = 5,238,145,337 gallons/year 45


## County Annual VMT = 8,836,074,725 m iles (Allegheny County) 44 

## State Annual VMT = 97,021,666,321 m iles 44 

## Control Efficiency (CE) = 96% 46 47


## Rule Penetration (RP) = 96% 46 47 

## Rule Effectiveness (RE ) = 80%

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual miles miles
day gallons
gallons VOC lbs Emissions VOC Annual

3185

. 120 2000 1 0855

. 637

, 240 100 80

100 96

100 96 1 321

, 666

, 021

, 97 725

, 074

, 836

, 8 337

, 145

, 238

, 5

1000

92

. 1

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −                        

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month gasoline sales/annual gasoline sales × weekday ratio/number of weekdays i n summer Summer work weekday allocation factor = 1,370,092,015/5,238,145,337 × 0.8333/65 = 0.00335 4 45



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 120.3185 × 0.00335 = 0.4035 tons VOC per day



## Stage II :

Vehicle refueling VOC emissions are estimated using MOBILE6.2

- based emission factors; 48

45 

## monthly gasoline sales estimates; and county

- level, annual vehicle miles traveled ( VMT)
data. 44 

## MOBILE6.2 provided monthly, emission factors for each county in Pennsylvania.

### 34 

## MOBILE6.2 input files were set up to model refueling emission factors in a manner similar to
that used for calculat ing onroad mobile source emissions for 2002. For each county, twelve monthly scenarios were modeled, along with an ozone season scenario and a winter scenario. These scenarios used the same 2002 monthly temperature and fuel inputs that were used in

prepa ring onroad mobile source emissions. Each input file also called upon the external county

specific age distribution file developed for 2002. No speed information or I/M program information was modeled, as these are not needed in the refueling calculation s.

Stage II control program information was included for the counties with controls based on program information regarding control efficiency from Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania counties with Stage II controls are Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Bucks, But ler, Chester, Delaware, Fayette, Montgomery, Philadelphia, Washington, and Westmoreland. 49 

## Vehicle

- specific emission factors were then obtained in the database output format of MOBILE6.2. Using the fuel economy data and VMT fraction data contained in the MOBILE6.2 output files, the gram per mile emission factors were first converted to gram per gallon emission factors. These gram per gallon emission factors were then weighted according to the VMT fraction of each gasoline vehicle type to obtain monthly, c ounty

- specific gram per gallon emission factors weighted for all gasoline vehicle types.

VMT data were used to allocate monthly Pennsylvania gasoline sales to each county. These are the same gasoline sales figures that are used to estimate Stage I emis sions. The MOBILE6.2 emission factors were then multiplied by the corresponding gasoline sales data to estimate refueling emissions. The VOC emissions calculations provide emissions at the county level for
each month of 2002.



# ( ) ( )        

= VMT State VMT County Sales Gasoline State Monthly Factor Emission VOC Emissions VOC June Allegheny



## wh ere: Allegheny County June Emission Factor = 1.027 grams/gallon 48


## PA June Gasoline Consumption =443,778,938 gallons 45


## Allegheny County 2002 VMT = 8,836,074,725 miles 44


## PA 2002 VMT = 97,021,666,321 miles 44



# ( )



# ∑

= = = ⋅ ⋅ =                

=

VOC tons Emissions County Allegheny Monthly Emissions VOC County Allegheny Annual VOC tons lb ton

g lb VOC g Emissions VOC June Allegheny miles miles gallons gallon VOC g Emissions VOC June Allegheny

8276

. 573 7546

. 45 2000

1

59

. 453 1 1

. 615

, 507

, 41 321

, 666

, 021

, 97 725

, 074

, 836

, 8 938

, 778

, 443 027

. 1



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month gasoline sales/annual gasoline sales × weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer

### 35 

### Summer work weekday allocation factor = 1,370,092,015/5,238,145,337 × 0.715/65 = 0.00288 4 45



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 573.8276 × 0.00288 = 1.6510 tons VOC per day



## Underground Storage Tank Breathing and Emptying :



# ( ) ( )        

= VMT Annual State VMT Annual County Sales Gasoline Annual State Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual



## where:

Emissio n Factor = 1.0 lbs VOC/1000 gallons 39 

## State Annual Gasoline Sales = 5,238,145,337 gallons/year 45 

## County Annual VMT = 8,836,074,725 m iles (Allegheny County) 44



## S tate Annual VMT = 97,021,666,321 m iles 44 

## Control Efficiency (CE) = 90% 46 50 

## Rule Penetration (RP) = 96% 46 50 

## Rule Effectiveness (RE) = 80%

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual miles miles
day gallons
gallons

VOC lbs Emissions VOC Annual

6572

. 73 2000 1 4698

. 314

, 147 100 80

100 96

100 90 1 321

, 666

, 021

, 97 725

, 074

, 836

, 8 337

, 145

, 238

, 5

1000

0

. 1

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −                        

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month gasoline sales/annual gasoline sales × weekday ratio/number of weekday s in summer Summer work weekday allocation factor = 1,370,092,015/5,238,145,337 × 0.715/65 = 0.00288 4 45



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 73.6572 × 0.00288 = 0.2119 tons VOC per day



## Truck Transit :



# ( ) ( )        

= VMT Annual State VMT Annual County Sales Gasoline Annual State Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual



## where: Emission Factor = 0.06 lbs VOC/1000 gallons 39 

## State Annual Gasoline Sales = 5,238,145,337 gallons/year 45 

## County Annu al VMT = 8,836,074,725 m iles (Allegheny County) 44 

## State Annual VMT = 97,021,666,321 m iles 44



## (The emission factor is based on the assumption that gasoline delivery is via single trips and

acc ounts for both full and empty truck travel.)

### 36 

### year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual miles miles
day gallons
gallons VOC lbs Emissions VOC Annual

3116

. 14 2000 1 2831

. 623

, 28 321

, 666

, 021

, 97 725

, 074

, 836

, 8 337

, 145

, 238

, 5

1000

06

. 0

= ⋅ =                        

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month gasoline sales/annual gasoline sales × weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer Summer work weekday allocation factor = 1,370,092,015/5,238,145,337 × 0.8333/65 = 0.00335 4 45



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 14.3116 × 0.00335 = 0.04799 tons VOC per day



## GRAPHIC ARTS (SCC 2425000000)

Graphic arts include operations that are involved in the printing of newspapers, magazines, books, and other printed material. Emissions of VOCs result from evapo ration of solvents used in inks and cleaning. The emissions for each county were calculated using a per capita emission factor and U.S. Census Bureau population data. Point source emissions, where present, were
subtracted from these emission estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Population)

where: Emission Factor = 1.3 lbs VOC/person/year 16 

## Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County) 7



### year per VOC tons 825.4376 lbs ton year per VOC s ound p ,650,875.2 Emissions VOC Annual people
year person VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

= ⋅ = ⋅ =

2000 1 1 904

, 269

, 1 3

. 1



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0028 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emiss ions = 825.4376 × 0.0028=2.2904 tons VOC per day



## HIGH PERFORMANCE INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE SOLVENT (SCC 2401100000)

The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evaporation of solvents from surface coating of objects and materials that may e xist in extreme conditions. There were no point sources. The emissions for each county were calculated using a per capita emission factor

### 37 

## and U.S. Census Bureau population data. Each county’s emissions were estimated per the following sample calculation s.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS: 

# ( ) ( )      

⋅ ⋅ − = 100 100 100 1 RE RP CE Population Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual



## where: Emission Factor = 0.8 lbs VOC/person/year 16 

## Population = 1,269,904 people (Allegheny County) 7


## CE (Control Efficiency) = 20% 5 

## RP (Rule Penetration) = 100% RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 100%



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual people
year person VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

3693

. 406 2000

1 56

. 738

, 812 1 904

, 269

, 1 8

. 0

100 100
100 100
100 20



### = ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ ⋅ =

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday a llocation factor = 0.00356 9 

### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 406.3693 × 0.00356=1.4473 tons VOC per day



## KEROSENE (2 SCCs)

(Residential Kerosene SCC 2104011000, Commercial/Institutional Kerosene SCC 2103011000)

Kerosen e combustion sources, which emit VOC, NO
x 

## , CO, SO 2 

## , and PM are grouped into two area source categories: Commercial/Institutional and Residential (all Industrial sector kerosene emissions are assumed to be included in the point source inventory). Emission s were calculated for each county using emission factors and Energy Information Administration fuel use information. The EIA kerosene consumption data are reported for each State. Commonwealth consumption was allocated to counties using data obtained fro m the County Business Patterns
and the U.S. Census Bureau.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

Residential Kerosene :

The emissions for residential kerosene combustion were determined by allocating total residential kerosene consumption in the Commonwealth to each c ounty. This allocation was performed using the ratio of dwelling units (DU) heating with kerosene in a county to the number of dwelling units heating with kerosene in the Commonwealth. The following is the general equation used to calculate emissions fro m residential kerosene combustion.

### 38 

## ( ) ( )        

− −

= DU g urnin B e Kerosen State DU urning B e Kerosen County Usage Oil Fuel Kerosene l Residentia PA Factor Emission Emissions Annual



## where: VOC Emission Factor = 0.7 lbs/1000 gallons/year 27



## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 17.4 lbs/1000 gallons/year 27


## CO Emission Factor = 4.8 lbs/1000 gallons/year 27



## SO 2 

## Emission Factor = 41.1 lbs/1000 gallons/year 27



## PM10

- FIL Emission Factor = 1.08 lbs/1000 gallon s/year 39



## PM25

- FIL Emission Factor = 0.83 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## PM

- CON Emission Factor = 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39


## PA Residential Kerosene Fuel Use = 83,366 thousands of gallons 42


## 2000 County Kerosene

- Burning DUs = 8123 Dwelling Units (Allegheny County) 7



## 2000 State Ker osene

- Burning DUs = 1,217,155 Dwelling Units 7



## VOC Emissions :

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual Units Dwelling Units Dwelling gallons of thousands gallons

VOC lbs Emissions VOC Annual

1947

. 0 2000 1 4553

. 389 155

, 217

, 1 8123 366

, 83 1000

7

. 0

= ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ =



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allo cation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions =0.1947 × 0.00275=0.000536 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :

year per CO tons pounds ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual Units Dwelling Units Dwelling gallons of thousands gallons

VOC lbs Emissions CO Annual

3353

. 1 2000 1 5503

. 2670 155

, 217

, 1 8123 366

, 83 1000

8

. 4

= ⋅ = ⋅ ⋅ =



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 1.3353 × 0.00275=0.00367 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissi ons × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 1.3353 × 0.00275=0.00367 tons CO per day



## Commercial/Institutional Kerosene :

### 39 

## Th e total amount of fuel oil was apportioned to each county according to the number of commercial facilities, which was obtained from County Business Patterns

. 2 

## The total
Commercial/Institutional kerosene cons umption in the Commonwealth was obtained from the Energy Information Administration. 42 

## The emission factors used for Commercial/Institutional
Kerosene were the same as those used for Commercial/ Institutiona l Distillate Fuel Oil as per EIIP guidance. Each county’s emissions for commercial/institutional fuel oil combustion were estimated per the following sample calculations.



# ( ) ( )        

= Facilities State of Number Facilities County of Number Use Kerosene Commercial PA Factor Emission Emissions Annual



## where: VOC Emission Factor = 0.34 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 20 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39


## CO Emission Factor = 5 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## SO 2 

## Emission Fa ctor = 142 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39 

## × 0.3% sulfur content = 42.6 lbs/1000 gallons/year
PM10

- FIL Emission Factor = 1.08 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## PM25

- FIL Emission Factor = 0.83 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## PM

- CON Emission Factor = 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39


## Kerosene Sulfur Content = 0.3% 27


## County Commercial Sector Facilities = 24,654 (Allegheny County) 2


## Commonwealth Commercial Sector Facilities = 197,795 2



## Commercial/Institutional Keros ene Oil Use = 16,290 thousands of gallons 42



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual Facilities Facilities gallons of thousands 16,290
year gallons lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

3452

. 0 2000 1 3544

. 690 795

, 197 654

, 24 1000 34

. 0

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday alloca tion factor = 0.00283 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.3452 × 0.00283 = 0.000976 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :

### 40 

# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual Facilities Facilities gallons of thousands 16,290
year gallons lbsCO

Emissions CO Annual

0761

. 5 2000

1 2703

. 10152 795

, 197 654

, 24 1000 5

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00283 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 5.0761 × 0.00283 = 0.0143 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emis sions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00283 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 5.0761 × 0.00283 = 0.0143 tons CO per day



## LANDFILLS (SCC 2620030000)

Municip al solid waste landfills receive primarily household and/or commercial waste. The VOC emissions from landfills are produced by volatilization, chemical reaction, and biological decomposition of refuse material.

The emissions were calculated using the t otal amount of refuse in Pennsylvania’s municipal solid waste landfills, not the landfills’ capacity. Since landfills continue to emit VOCs long after they are closed (at least 20 years), data from active and inactive landfills were collected.

For active landfills, data from page two of the 2002 “Annual Facility Capacity Report” for each landfill were collected. In particular, Total Waste Accepted was needed for the final emissions
calculation.

Several landfills that were included in the 1996 Pennsylvan ia area source inventory were not included in the compilation of 2002 facility reports provided by PA DEP. After confirming with PA DEP that these landfills are inactive (in a few cases the landfills had merely been renamed), the 1996 Total Waste Accepted data for these now

- closed landfills were incorporated into the 2002 inventory.

Total Waste Accepted was summed at the county level to calculate the total landfill emissions in each county. The emissions estimate was adjusted for precipitation. Each cou nty’s emissions were estimated per the following sample calculation.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATION:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Precipitation Adjustment Factor)(Tons of Waste)

### 41 

## where: Emission Factor = 13.6 tons VOC/1,000,000 tons of waste Precipitation Adjustment Factor = 2.6 Amount of Waste = 19,422,841.6 tons of waste (Allegheny County)



# ( ) ( )

year per VOC tons Emissions VOC Annual waste of tons year waste tons VOC tons

Emissions VOC Annual

7917

. 686 6

. 841

, 422

, 19 6

. 2 000

, 000

, 1 6

. 13

=   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation f actor = 0.00275 4


### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 686.7917 × 0.00275 = 1.8887 tons VOC per day



## MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT (SCC 2401055000)

The VOC emissions from this source category result from the evapor ation of the solvent used in the coating process in manufacturing facilities, such as engines, turbines, farm and garden equipment, computers, and office machinery. The emissions for each county were calculated using an employment

- based emission factor an d employee data from NAICS Codes 333 (except 333314 and 333315), 33271, 332991, 332997, 3341, and 336391. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 using the
ratio of 2002 total Commonwea lth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)

. 3 

## Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from the Machinery and Equipment category emissi on estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 77 lbs VOC /employee/year 16 

## Employees = 4944 employees (Allegheny County) 2 3



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual employees
year employee VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

344

. 190 2000

1 688

, 380 4944

77

= ⋅ =   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00277 4

### 42 

### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 190.344 × 0.00277 = 0.5282 tons VOC per day



## MARINE COATING (SCC 2401080000)

This source category includes ship and boat building and repairing. The emissions we re calculated using an employment

- based emission factor and employee data from NAICS code 33661. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business

Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)

. 3 

## Each county’s emissions were estimated per the following sample calculations below. Point sourc e emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where: Emission Factor = 308 lbs VOC /employee/year 16 

## Employees = 52 employees (Allegheny County) 2 3



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual Employees
year Employee lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

008

. 8 2000

1 016

, 16 52

308

= ⋅ =   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0028 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 8.008 × 0.0028 = 0.0222 tons VOC per day



## METAL CANS (SCC 2401040000)

This source category includes the m anufacturing of metal cans, barrels, drums, kegs, and pails. The emissions from point sources, where present, were subtracted from the emissions of the corresponding county. The emissions for each county were calculated per the calculation below using an employment

- based emission factor and employee data from NAICS Codes 332431 and 332439. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business

Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)

. 3 

## Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATION:

### 43 

## Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where: Emission Factor = 6,029 lbs VOC/employee/year 16 

## Employees =48 employees (Allegheny County) 2 3



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual Employees
year Employee lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

696

. 144 2000

1 392

, 289 48 029

, 6

= ⋅ =   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0028 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 144.696 × 0.0028 = 0.4015 tons VOC per day



## METAL FURNITURE AND FIXTURES (SCC 2401025000)

This source category includes manufacturing metal household and office furniture, such as beds, cabinets, desks, bookcases, and chairs. The emissions for each county were calculated per the sample calculations below using an employment

- based emission factor and employee data for NAICS codes 337121, 337124, 337214, and 337215. The number of employees in each county
for 2001 was ob tained from County Business Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 3 

## Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from
these emission estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where: Emission Factor = 1, 597 lbs VOC /employee/year 16 

## Employees = 487 employees (Allegheny County) 2 3

### 44 

# ( )

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual employees
year employee lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

8695

. 388 2000 1 739

, 777 487 597

, 1

= ⋅ =   

 

  

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC e missions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0028 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 388.8695 × 0.0028 = 1.0790 tons VOC per day



## MISCELLA NEOUS FINISHED METAL (SCC 2401050000)

This source category includes facilities which enamel, lacquer, and/or varnish metals. The emissions for each county were calculated per the sample calculations below using an employment

- based emission factor and emp loyee data from NAICS Codes 332812, 339911, 339912, and 339914. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Com monwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)

. 3 

## Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates.

SAMPLE V OC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where: Emission Factor = 2,877 lbs VOC/employee/year 16 

## Employees = 683 employees (Allegheny County) 2 3



# ( )

year per VOC tons pounds ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual employees
year employee VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

4955

. 982 2000 1 991

, 964

, 1 683

2877

= ⋅ =   

 

  

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0028 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 982.4955 × 0.0028 = 2.7262 tons VOC per day

### 45 

## MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING (SCC 2401090000)

This source category includes establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing products not
classif ied in any other group such as jewelry, silverware, musical instruments, dolls, toys, games, pens, pencils, buttons, brooms, and caskets. The emissions for each county were calculated per the sample calculations below using a per capita emission factor an d U.S. Census Bureau population data. Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission
estimates.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Population)

where:
Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs VOC/ person/year 16 

## Population =1,269,904 (Allegheny County) 7



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual people
year person VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

9712

. 380 2000

1 4

. 942

, 761 904

, 269

, 1 6

. 0

= ⋅ =    

 

   

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation facto r Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0028 4



### Summer work weekday VOC Emissions = 380.9712 × 0.0028 = 1.0633 tons VOC per day



## NATURAL GAS AND LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS (LPG) (4 SCCs)

(Residential Natural Gas SCC 2104006000, Commercial/Institutional Natural Gas SCC 2103006000, Residential LPG SCC 2104007000, Commercial/Institutional LPG SCC 2103007000)

Natural gas and LPG are used in residential, commercial/institutional, and industrial facilities.
Industr ial natural gas and LPG consumption is considered to be covered in the point source inventory. Area source natural gas and LPG emissions were estimated using fuel consumption
data and AP

- 42 emission factors. Because monthly natural gas consumption data w ere available, these data were used in developing the summer and winter season work weekday allocation factors. Consumption data were apportioned according to the number of dwelling units heating with natural gas/LPG, which was available from U.S. Census Bureau data (for residential sources), and according to the number of commercial sector facilities, obtained from County Business Patterns (for commercial/institutional sources). Commercial and Residential LPG consumption was not available for 2002; there fore, the 2001 consumption was grown to 2002 by

### 46 

## applying the ratio of 2002 Commercial/Residential propane sales in Pennsylvania to 2001 Commercial/Residential propane sales in the Commonwealth. Commercial LPG consumption in
2001 was obtained from the Ener gy Information Administration’s State Energy Data 2001

. Propane sales for 2001 and 2002 were obtained from Petroleum Marketing Annual. 51 52 

## Each county’s emissions were estimated using the sample calculations below. For Commercial sector categories, point sources, where present, were subtracted from the emissions of the corresponding county.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

Natural Gas :

Residential Natural Gas : 

# ( ) ( )

        ⋅ =

Units Dwelling State Burning

- Gas

- Natural Units Dwelling County Burning

- Gas

- Natural n Consumptio Gas Natural esidential StatewideR Factor Emission Emissions Annual



## where: VOC Emission Factor = 5.5 lbs/MMcf (million cubic feet)/year 39



## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 94 lbs/MMcf/year 39


## CO Emission Factor = 40 lbs/MMcf/year 39



## SO 2 

## Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs/MMcf/year 39



## PM10

- FIL Emission Factor = 1.9 lbs/MMcf/year 39



## PM25

- FIL Emission Factor =1.9 lbs/MMcf/year 39



## PM

- CON Emission Fa ctor =5.7 lbs/MMcf/year 39


## Pb Emission Factor = 0.0005 lbs/MMcf/year 39


## Residential Natural Gas Consumption = 237,640 MMcf 53


## County Dwelling Units Heating with Na tural Gas = 474,292 (Allegheny County) 7


## State Dwelling Units Heating with Natural Gas = 2,452,941 units 7



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual units dwelling state units dwelling county MMcf
year MMcf lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

3604

. 126 2000

1 7666

. 720

, 252 941

, 452

, 2 292

, 474 640

, 237 5

. 5

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=



### Summer wor k weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.000783 54



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 126.3604 × 0.000783 = 0.0989 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :

### 47 

# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual units dwelling state units dwelling county MMcf
year MMcf VOC lbs

Emissions CO Annual

9846

. 918 2000

1 211

. 969

, 837

, 1 941

, 452

, 2 292

, 474 640

, 237 40

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.000783 54



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 918.9846 × 0.000783 = 0.7196 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor =0.00526 54



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 918.9 846 × 0.00526 = 4.8370 tons CO per day



## Commercial/Institutional Natural Gas :



# ( ) ( )        

= Units Commercial State Units Commercial County

n Consumptio Gas Natural Commercial PA Factor Emission Emissions Annual



## where: VOC Emission Factor = 5.5 lbs/MMcf (million cubic feet)/year 39



## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 100 lbs/M Mcf/year 39


## CO Emission Factor = 84 lbs/MMcf/year 39



## SO 2 

## Emission Factor = 0.6 lbs/MMcf/year 39



## PM10

- FIL Emission F actor = 1.9 lbs/MMcf/year 39



## PM25

- FIL Emission Factor = 1.9 lbs/MMcf/year 39



## PM

- CON Emission Factor = 5.7 lbs/MMcf/year 39


## Pb Emission Factor = 0.0005 lbs/MMcf/year 39


## Commercial Natural Gas Consumption = 148,346 MMcf 53


## County Commercial Sector Facilities = 24,654 (Allegheny County) 2


## Commonwealth Commercial Sector Facilities = 197,795 2



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual units commercial state units commercial county MMcf
year MMcf lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

8488

. 50 2000

1 5786

. 697

, 101 795

, 197 654

, 24 346

, 148 5

. 5

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emission s × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor =0.00125 55



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 50.8488 × 0.00125 = 0.0634 tons VOC per day

### 48 

## CO Emissions :



# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual units commercial state units commercial county MMcf
year MMcf lbsCO

Emissions CO Annual

5997

. 776 2000

1 382

. 199

, 553

, 1 795

, 197 654

, 24 346

, 148 84

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00125 55



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 776.5997 × 0.00125 = 0.9683 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emiss ions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor =0.00478 55



### Winter work weekday CO emissions =776.5997 × 0.00478 = 3.7121 tons CO per day



## LPG :

Residen tial LPG :


# ( ) ( )

       

− − ⋅ =

Units Dwelling State Burning LPG Units Dwelling County Burning LPG n Consumptio LPG l Residentia Factor Emission Emissions Annual



## where: VOC Emission Factor = 0.5 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 14 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## CO Emission Facto r = 1.9 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## SO 2 

## Emission Factor = 0.1 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39 

## × 0.54 grains/100 cubic feet = 0.054 lbs/1000 gallons/year
PM10

- FIL Emission F actor = 0.4 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## PM25

- FIL Emission Factor = 0.4 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## PM

- CON Emission Factor = 0.506 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39


## Residential LPG Sulfur Content = 0.54 grains/100 cubic feet 27


## Residential LPG Consumption = 157,014,873.6 gallons 25 51 52


## County Dwelling Units Heating with LPG = 4317 units (Allegheny County) 7


## Commonwealth Dwelling Units Heating with LP G = 145,254 units 7



## Residential LPG Consumption Calculation : 25 51 52

### 49 

### LPG gallons barrel gallons LPG barrels thousand

. LPG barrels thousand day per LPG gallons thousand day per LPG gallons thousand

. LPG barrels thousand

. n Consumptio Propane PA n Consumptio Propane PA

n Consumptio LPG l Residentia n Consumptio LPG l Residentia

6

. 873

, 014

, 157 1 42 449 3738 449

. 3738 9

. 765 8 822 92024 3479 2001 2002 ) 2001 ( 2002

= ⋅ = ⋅ = ⋅ =



## Data Sources for Residential LPG Consumption Calculation: 2001 Residential LPG Consumption 25


## 2002 PA Propane Consumption 51



## 200 1 PA Propane Consumption 43



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual units dwelling county units dwelling county gallons
year gallons lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

1666

. 1 2000

1 2687

. 2333 254

, 145 317

, 4 6

. 873

, 014

, 157 1000 5

. 0

= ⋅ =        

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0 .00275 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 1.1666 × 0.00275 = 0.00321 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :



# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual units dwelling county units dwelling county gallons
year gallons VOC lbs

Emissions CO Annual

4332

. 4 2000

1 4209

. 8866 254

, 145 317

, 4 6

. 873

, 014

, 157 1000 9

. 1

= ⋅ =        

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday al location factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 4.4332 × 0.00275 = 0.0122 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter w ork weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 4.4332 × 0.00275 = 0.0122 tons CO per day



## Commercial/Institutional LPG :

### 50 

# ( ) ( )        

= Units Commercial State Units Commercial County

n Consumptio LPG Commercial Factor Emission Emissions Annual



## where: VOC Emission Factor = 0.5 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 14 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39


## CO Emission Factor = 1.9 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## SO 2 

## Emission Factor = 0.1 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39 

## × 0.54 grains/100 cubic feet = 0.054 lbs/1000 gallons/year
PM10

- FIL Emission Factor = 0.4 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## PM25

- FIL Emission Factor = 0.4 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39



## PM

- CON Emission Factor = 0.506 lbs/1000 gallons/year 39


## Commercial/Institutional LPG Sulfur Content = 0.54 grains/100 cubic feet 27


## Commercial LPG Consumption = 1,380,620.1 gallons 25 51 52 

## (computed in the same manner as Residential LPG Consumption above) County Commercial Facilities = 24,654 (Allegheny County) 2



## Commonwealth C ommercial Facilities = 197,795 units 2



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual units commercial state units commercial county gallons
year gallons lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

0430

. 0 2000

1 0431

. 86 795

, 197 654

, 24 1

. 620

, 380

, 1 1000 5

. 0

= ⋅ =        

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation f actor = 0.0028 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.0430 × 0.0028 = 0.000122 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :



# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual units commercial state units commercial county gallons
year gallons lbsCO

Emissions CO Annual

1635

. 0 2000

1 9640

. 326 795

, 197 654

, 24 1

. 620

, 380

, 1 1000 9

. 1

= ⋅ =        

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work week day allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0028 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = 0.1635 × 0.0028 = 0.000462 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × wi nter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.0028 4

### 51 

### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 0.1635 × 0.0028 = 0.000462 tons CO per day



## OPEN BURNING (5 SCCs)

(Residential Municipal Solid Waste Open Burning SCC 2610030000; Residential Leaf Open Burning SCC 2610000100; Residential Brush Open Burning SCC 2610000400; Commercial/Institutional Open Burning SCC 2610020000, Industrial Open Burning SCC 2610010000)

Open burning can be done i n open drums or baskets, in fields and yards, and in large open dumps or pits. Materials commonly disposed of in this manner include municipal waste, auto body components, landscape refuse, agricultural field refuse, wood refuse, bulky industrial refuse, and leaves. For emission inventory purposes, Open Burning is divided into five categories: Residential Municipal Solid Waste (MSW); Residential Leaf; Residential Brush; Commercial/Institutional; and Industrial.

Criteria pollutant annual emissions associ ated with three of the Residential Open Burning categories (i.e., MSW, Leaf, and Brush) were compiled from an inventory prepared for the Mid

Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE

- VU). 56 

## Because the MANE

- VU estimates were prepared at the Census tract le vel, it was necessary to aggregate these estimates to the county

level. In many cases, it was necessary to develop a county

- level RP value by weighting MANE

VU inventory Census tract level RP values by Census tract emissions. Seasonal emission
estimates were calculated from the annual estimates using the temporal allocation profiles developed in the MANE

- VU inventory project.

Annual emission estimates for Commercial/Institutional and Industrial Open Burning were calculated in this project using AP

- 42 emi ssion factors and population and employment based emission activity loading factors. 16 39 

## U.S. Census Bureau population data were used in the
Residential and Commercial/Institutional calculations, while the number of Manufacturing employees (NAICS 31

- 33) was used for the Industrial category. The 2001 Manufacturing sector employment data from County Business Patterns 2 

## was grown to 2002 using the ratio of the 2002 Pennsylvania Manufacturing sector employment to the 2001 Pennsylvania Manufacturing sector employment obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 3 

## Seasona l Commercial/Institutional and Industrial emission estimates were developed by applying temporal allocation profiles from
EPA’s EMCH to the annual emission estimates. 4 

## Commercial/Institutional and Industrial Open Burning are prohibited in the Commonwealth. An 80 percent RE value was applied to each county’s Commercial/Institutional and Industrial emissions to reflect less than 100 percent compliance with the burning ban. 57 

## For the Industrial and Commercial s ector source categories, point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates.

The following provides samples of the emission calculations performed in this effort for each of the five open burning categories.

SAMPLE CALCU LATIONS:

### 52 

## Residential MSW Open Burning :

(See MANE

- VU inventory report for discussion of annual emission calculations) 56



## Annual VOC emissions (Allegheny County) = 0.3823 tons VOC per year

Summer work weekda y VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0021 56



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.3823 × 0.0021 = 0.0008 tons VOC per day



## Ann ual PM10

- PRI emissions (Allegheny County) = 1.6979 tons VOC per year Winter work weekday PM10

- PRI emissions = annual PM10

- PRI emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.0021 56



### Winter work weekday PM10

- PRI emissions = 1.6979 × 0.0021 = 7.2489 tons VOC per day



## Residential Leaf Open Burning :

(See MANE

- VU inventory report for discussion of annual emission calculations) 56



## Because the summer and winter season work weekday allocation factors for leaf burning are 0, summer season work weekday and winter season work weekday emissions are 0.

Residential Brush Open Burning :

(See MANE

- VU inventory report for discussion of annual emission calculations) 56



## Annual VOC emissions (Allegheny County) = 0.2263 tons VOC per year Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.0005 56



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.2263 × 0.0005 = 0.0001 tons VOC per day



## Annual PM10

- PRI emissions (Allegheny County) = 0.235 tons VOC per year Winter work weekday P M10

- PRI emissions = annual PM10

- PRI emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.0017 56



### Winter work weekday PM10

- PRI emissions = 0.235 × 0.0017 = 0.00004 tons VOC per day



## Commercial/Institutional Open Burning :



# ( ) ( ) ( )      

⋅ ⋅ − = 100 100 100 1 RE RP CE Population Factor Loading Factor Emission Emissions Annual

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 30 lbs VOC/ton waste/year 39

### 53 

## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 6 lbs NO
x 

## /ton waste/year 39


## CO Emission Factor = 85 lbs CO/ton waste/year 39


## Loading Factor = 24 tons waste/1000 people 39


## Population = 94,437 people ( Adams County

– th is is non

- air basin county) 7


## CE (Control Efficiency) = 100% 57 

## RP (Rule Penetration) = 100% RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 80% 57



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual people

, people

waste tons

year waste ton VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

7995

. 6 2000

1 928

. 598

, 13 100 80

100 100

100 100 1 437 94 1000 24 30

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −        
  

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 6.79 95 × 0.00275 = 0.0187 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :



# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual people

, people

waste tons

year waste ton CO lbs

Emissions CO Annual

2651

. 19 2000

1 296

. 530

, 38 100 80

100 100

100 100 1 437 94 1000 24 85

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −        
  

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions =19.2651 × 0.00275 = 0.0530 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 19.2651 × 0.00275 = 0.0530 tons CO per day



## Industrial Open Burning :



# ( ) ( ) ( )      

⋅ ⋅ − = 100 100 100 1 RE RP CE Employees Factor Loading Factor Emission Emissions Annual



## where: Emission Factors are the same as for Commercial/Institutional Open Burning Loading Factor = 160 tons waste/1000 employees 39

### 54 

## Employees = 8,216 employees ( Adams County

– this is non

- air basin county) 2 3


## Control Efficiency = 100% 57



## Rule Penetration = 100% Rule Effectiveness = 80% 57



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual employees employees waste tons

year waste ton VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

9437

. 3 2000

1 36

. 7887 100 80

100 100

100 100 1 8216 1000 160 30

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −        

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 3.9437 × 0.00275 = 0.0108 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :



# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual employees employees waste tons

year waste ton CO lbs

Emissions CO Annual

1738

. 11 2000

1 52

. 347

, 22 100 80

100 100

100 100 1 8216 1000 160 85

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −        

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions =11.1738 × 0.00275 = 0.0307 tons CO per da y

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 11.1738 × 0.00275 = 0.0307 tons CO per day



## OTHER SPECIAL PURPOSE COATING (SCC 2401200000)

This category includes special purpose coatings used for applications such as maintenance operations at industrial and other facilities, auto refinishing, traffic paints, marine finishes, an d aerosol sprays. Note that this category covers those specific coating processes not already included in other source categories (e.g., High Performance Industrial Maintenance Coatings). Emissions for this category were estimated using a per capita emis sion factor and U.S. Bureau of the Census population data. Each county’s emissions were calculated per the following sample
calculations.

### 55 

## SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS: 

# ( ) ( )      

⋅ ⋅ − = 100 100 100 1 RE RP CE Population Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 0.8 lbs VOC/person/year 16 

## Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County) 7


## Control Efficiency = 20% 5



## Rule Penetration = 100% Rule Effectiveness = 100%



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual people
year person VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

3693

. 406 2000

1 56

. 738

, 812 100 100

100 100

100 20 1 904

, 269

, 1 8

. 0

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00356 9 

### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 406.3693 × 0.00356 = 1.4473 tons VOC per day



## OTHER TRANSPORTATION (SCC 2401085000)

This source category includes the finishing of vehicles and vehicle parts not included in other source categories (note that area source emissions were not estimated for the Motor Vehicle Surface Coating categor y because all Pennsylvania automobile assembly plants are assumed to be included in the point source inventory). The emissions for each county were calculated per the sample calculations below using an employment

- based emission factor and employee data fr om NAICS Codes 33633, 33634, 33635, 333924, 336312, 336322, 336399, 336411, 336413, and 33651. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was obtained from County Business

Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 us ing the ratio or 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 3 

## Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emissi on estimates. Note that emissions for this category are reported using the Railroad SCC because there is no “Other Transportation”
SCC.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 35 lbs VOC/employee/year 16 

## Employees = 2556 employees (Allegheny County) 2 3

### 56 

# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual employees
year employee VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

73

. 44 2000

1 460

, 89 2556 35

= ⋅ =   

 

  

 

=

Summer work wee kday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00287 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 44.73 × 0.00287 = 0.1282 tons VOC per day



## PESTICIDE APPLICATION (SCC 2461800000)

Pesticides, which contain petroleum solvents and synthetic organic ingredients, are used to kill or retard the growth of insects, rodents, fungi, weeds, or microorganisms. The bulk of pesticide application is asso ciated with agriculture and, therefore, occurs in rural areas. The VOC emissions for each county were estimated using an emission factor based on the number of harvested acres. Harvested acreage data were obtained from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’ s National Agricultural Statistics Service. 58



## SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Acres Harvested)

where:

VOC Emission Factor = 3.5 lbs VOC /acre harvested/year 16 

## Acres Harvested = 10,527.2490 acres harvested (Allegheny County) 58



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual harvested acres year harvested acres VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

4227

. 18 2000

1 3716

. 845

, 36 2490

. 527

, 10 5

. 3

= ⋅ =    

 

   

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00277 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 18.4227 × 0.00277 = 0.0510 tons VOC per day



## PORTABLE GASOLINE CONTAINERS (SCC 2501060300)

This category covers emissions from residential and commercial sector p ortable gasoline containers. This category accounts for permeation, diurnal, transport, spillage, and vapor

### 57 

## displacement emissions. Permeation, diurnal, and transport emissions are based on daily gasoline container throughput data. Gasoline throughput f or 2002 was estimated based on gas container population and use data obtained from a California Air Resources Board survey. 59 

## The year 2002 residential container population was estimated from the county

- level number of occupied housing units. 60 

## For countie s for which 2002 occupied housing units data were not available, 2000 year housing units data 61

7 

## were projected to 2002 based on county population growth rates. The year 2002 commercial container population w as estimated from the number
of commercial sector businesses. 62 

## County

- level nonroad equipment gasoline consumption
estimates were obtained from the NONROAD model. 63



## County

- level year 2002 housing unit, commercial facility, and gasoline throughput data w ere then used in the emission calculation procedures described in Control Measure Development Support Analysis of Ozone Transport Commission Model Rules. 9 

## For the permeation, diurnal, and transport emission processes, these procedures result in daily emission estimates for both residential and commercial. These emissions were converted to annual emissions by multiplying by 214 days based on the assumption that nonroad equipment is fueled via gas containers

p rimarily between April and October. The resulting annual emission estimates were then added to the spillage and vapor displacement annual emissions estimates, which were developed from annual NONROAD model gasoline consumption data, to yield total portabl e gasoline container annual emissions for each county. Summer season work weekday allocation factors were developed from the NONROAD model temporal allocations and applied to the annual emissions estimates to obtain summer season workday emissions. 63



## SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATION:

For Allegheny County :

days 214 Emissions Daily Emissions VOC Transport and Diurnal,

, Permeation Annual × = 

# ∑

where (calculated using Ozone Transport Commission methods): Allegheny Residential Permeation VOC Emissions = 299,065.1043 g/day

A llegheny Residential Diurnal VOC Emissions = 2,582,567.049 g/day Allegheny Residential Transport VOC Emissions = 141,733.9079 g/day Allegheny Commercial Permeation VOC Emissions = 41,816.3711 g/day Allegheny Commercial Diurnal VOC Emissions = 408,285.9064 g/day Allegheny Commercial Transport VOC Emissions = 255,584.0428 g/day

Annual Permeation, Diurnal, and Transport VOC Emissions = 3,729,052.382 g/day × 214 Annual Permeation, Diurnal, and Transport VOC Emissions = 798,017,209.6 g/year

Total Annual Emiss ions = Annual Permeation, Diurnal, and Transport Emissions + Annual Spillage Emissions + Annual Vapor Displacement Emissions

where: Spillage VOC Emissions = 307,338,392.7 g/year Vapor Displacement VOC Emissions = 93,509,532.4 g/year

### 58 

## Total Annual Emission s = 798,017,209.6 g/year + 307,338,392.7 g/year + 93,509,532.4 g/year

Total Annual Emissions = 1,198,865,134.7 g/year ×
g ton

74

. 184

, 907 1



## = 1,321.5226 tons/year

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allo cation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month proportion × weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.3600 × 0.692/65 = 0.00383 63 

### Summer work weekday VOC emission s = 1321.5226 × 0.00383 = 5.0639 tons VOC per day



## REFRIGERANT LOSSES (SCC 2399010000)
This source category covers industrial refrigerant losses from refrigeration equipment used in such industries as ice cream manufacturing, meat packing plants, ice manufa cturing, and refrigerated warehousing. Losses occur in both the normal use of refrigeration systems and during malfunctions. Emissions for each county were estimated using an employment

- based
emission factor 64

, 65 

## and the number of employees in the following NAICS codes: 311611, 311612, 311613, 311615, 311512

- 311514, 31152, 311411, 311412, 311421

- 311423, 31181, 31132, 31133, 31211

- 31213, 31171, 312113, 311991, 311999, 325211, 49312, 311612, 42281, 42282. The number of employees in each county was obtained from County Business Patterns 66


## and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Each county’s emissions were estimated per the sample calculations be low.

SAMPLE NH 3 

## EMISSION CALCULATION:
Annual NH 3 

## Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Number of Employees in Sector)

Where:
Emission Factor = 30 lbs NH 3 

## / employee/ year Employees = 8265 (Allegheny County)



# ( ) employees
year employee NH lbs Eissions NH Annual 8265 / 3 30 3      

≡

Annual NH 3 

## Emissions = 247,950 pounds NH 3 

## per year * lbs ton

2000

1 

## = 123.975 tons NH 3 

## / year

### 59 

## PORTABLE GAS CONTAINERS

This category covers emissions from portable gas container use, both commercial and
residential. Emission estimates account for permeation, diurnal, transport

- spillage, spillage, and vapor displacement emissions. Estimated use data is based on survey information from the California Air Resources Board. The number of housing units is
used as an indicator for residential containers. The number of commercial bus inesses expected to have at least one gas container is used to estimate commercial use. Emissions for 1996 were taken from estimates developed for the analysis of the OTC Model Rules 29



## . Emissions were then projected to 1999 using population as the growth indicato PUBLIC OWNED TREATMENT WORKS (3 SCCs)

Public Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) are wastewater treatment plants typically owned by municipalities. Emissions are calculated for three POTW processes: POTW Wastewater Treatment Processes (SCC 2630020010 ), POTW Biosolids Processes (SCC 2630020020), and Biosolids Land Application (SCC 2630050000). Biosolids are recyclable solid, semisolid, or liquid untreated residue from sewage treatment in a wastewater treatment plant.

Although both VOC and NH 3 

## emissio ns result from each of the three processes included in this category, VOC emissions are only estimated for POTW Wastewater Treatment Processes (SCC 2630020010) because of the lack of VOC emission factors for the other processes. Annual NH 3 

## emission estima tes were taken from an on

- going Mid

- Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE

- VU) inventory development project. As part of this Pennsylvania inventory effort, annual VOC emissions were estimated for the POTW Wastewater Treatment Processes category using the MANE

- VU project Pennsylvania emission activity data (total POTW flow) and an AP

42 sewage treatment emission factor. 28 

## Summer season work weekday emissions were calculated for each process using a summer season work weekday allocation factor based on EIIP temporal allocation guidance. 1



## Year 2000 POTW flow data for Pennsylvania facilities were obtained from the EPA Office of Wastewater Management’s year 200 0 Clean Watersheds Needs Survey. 67

7 

## Year 2002 wastewater flow was estimated from the county population change between 2000 and 2002. Year 2000 statewide biosolids generation was obtained from BioCycle 2000. 68

7 

## Facility

- level biosolids production was estimated based on allocating State generation using facility

- level wastewater flow rates. Year 2002 biosolids generation was estimated by applying Bureau of Census county population growth rates to year 2000 gene ration. Land application of total biosolids generation was calculated by multiplying total generation by 55 percent, which represents the percentage of total Pennsylvania biosolids generation applied to lan d. 68 

## Further information on the annual emission estimation methods for the processes in this category will be available in a forthcoming report prepared for MANE

- VU. Where present, point source emissions we re subtracted from the

### 60 

## emissions of the corresponding county. Each county’s emissions were calculated per the following sample calculations.

SAMPLE VOC CALCULATIONS:



# ( ) ( ) Flow Wastewater County Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual =

where: Emission Factor = 8.9 lbs VOC/millions of gallons flow Flow = 75,290.54 million gallons (Allegheny County)



# ( )

VOC tons lbs ton lbs Emissions VOC Annual lbs gallons 6 E year gallons

million VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

04

. 335 2000

1 81

. 085

, 670 81

. 085

, 670 54

. 290

, 75 9

. 8

=        

= =   

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00385 1



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 335.04 × 0.00385 = 1.2899 tons VOC per day



## SAMPLE NH 3 

## CALCULATION: 

# ( ) 2000 / EF x G NH3 Emissions NH3 Annual =

Where: G = Annual amount of wastewater processed (MMgal) = 75,290 (Allegheny Co.)

EF NH3 

## = Ammonia emission fac tor of 0.027 lb/ MMgal (Pechan, 2004a) 64



## Annual NH 3 

## Emissions = 

# ( ) 2000 / 3 027

. 0 290

, 75 NH lb x MMgal = 1.016415 Tons NH 3



## RESIDENTIAL WOOD COMBUSTION (7 SCCs)

(Fireplaces: Without Inserts SCC 2104008001; Fireplaces: Inserts

- Catalytic, non

- EPA

- certified SCC 2104008002; Fireplaces: Inserts

- Non

- catalytic, EPA

- certified SCC 2104008003; Fireplaces: Inserts

- Catalytic, EPA

- certified SCC 2104008004; Woodstoves

- Conventional SCC 2104008010; Woodstoves

- Catalytic SCC 2104008030; and Woodstoves

- Non

- catalytic SCC 2104008050)

### 61 

## Criteria pollutant annual emissions associated with residential heating with wood were compiled from the 2002 nonpoint source National Emissions Inventory (NEI). 31 

## The 2002 NEI reports residential wood combustion emissions in seven SCCs, each of which representing a specific combustion equipment type. The NEI reports emissions for the following criteria pollutants: VOC, NO
x 

## , CO, SO 2 

## , PM10

- PRI, and PM25

- PRI. The N EI residential wood combustion emission estimation methodology is based on the national population of each equipment type and an estimate of the amount of wood burned in each type of equipment. The national wood combustion estimates by equipment type were then allocated to counties using a number of steps. These steps incorporated information on heating degree days by climate zone, and the urban/rural designation and number of single

- family detached homes in each county. Further details on the
annual emi ssion estimation methodology are available in a forthcoming 2002 nonpoint source
NEI document. 31



## The majority of the residential wood combustion emission factors were obtained from EPA's AP

42 document. 39 

## County

- level seasonal throughput percentages developed for the 2002 NEI were applied in this effort to estimate winter season work weekday emissions (no residential wood combustion activity was allocated to summer season mon ths).

SAMPLE SEASONAL CALCULATION (FIREPLACES WITHOUT INSERTS):

Annual PM10

- PRI emissions (Allegheny County) = 59.8205 tons VOC per year Winter work weekday PM10

- PRI emissions = annual PM10

- PRI emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor


## Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.0044 Winter work weekday VOC emissions = 59.8205 × 0.0044 = 0.2632 tons VOC per day

PORTABLE GAS CONTAINERS

This category covers emissions from portable gas container use, both commercial and
residential. Emission estimat es account for permeation, diurnal, transport

- spillage, spillage, and vapor displacement emissions. Estimated use data is based on survey information from the California Air Resources Board. The number of housing units is
used as an indicator for residen tial containers. The number of commercial businesses expected to have at least one gas container is used to estimate commercial use. Emissions for 1996 were taken from estimates developed for the analysis of the OTC Model Rules 29



## . Emissions were then pr ojected to 1999 using population as the growth indicato SOLID WASTE INCINERATION (2 SCCs)

(Commercial/Institutional Solid Waste Incineration SCC 2601020000, Industrial Solid Waste Incineration SCC 2601010000)

### 62 

## Solid waste may consist of any discarded solid materials from commercial or industrial sources. The materials may be combustible or noncombustible, and are often burned to reduce bulk, unless direct burial is either available or practical. The resulting pollutants for the purpose of this inventory ar e VOC, NO
x 

## , and CO. On

- site incineration is the confined burning of waste leaves, landscape refuse, or other refuse or rubbish. Slash and large scale agricultural open burning are not included in this emission category.

The emissions for each county wer e estimated per the sample calculations below using emission factors and loading factors from AP

- 42, population data from the U.S. Census Bureau, and employee data from County Business Patterns . Point source emissions, where present, were
subtracted from these emission estimates.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS:

Commercial/Institutional Solid Waste Incineration :

Annual Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Loading Factor)(Population)

where: VOC Emission Factor = 9.8 lbs VOC/ton waste burned/year 39



## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 3.7 lbs NO
x 

## /ton waste burned/year 39 

## CO Emission Factor = 37 lbs CO/ton waste burned/year 39 

## Loading Factor = 54 tons/1000 people 39 

## Population = 1,269,904 people (Allegheny County) 7



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual people

, , people

waste tons

year burned waste ton lbsVOC

Emissions VOC Annual

0166

. 336 2000

1 1968

. 033

, 672 904 269 1 1000 54 8

. 9

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 336.0166 × 0.00275 = 0.9240 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :

### 63 

# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual people

, , people

waste tons

year burned waste ton CO lbs

Emissions CO Annual

6341

. 1268 2000

1 192

. 268

, 537

, 2 904 269 1 1000 54 37

= ⋅ =        
  

 

  

 

=

Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emission s × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions =1268.6341 × 0.00275 = 3.4887 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = ann ual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 1268.6341 × 0.00275 = 3.4887 tons CO per day



## Industrial Solid Waste Incineration :

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Loading Factor)(Number of Employees)

where:
Emission Factors are the same as noted above Loading Factor = 560 tons/1000 employees 39 

## Employees = 48,544 employees (Al legheny County) 2 3



## VOC Emissions :



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual employees 48,544 employees burned waste tons

year burned waste ton VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

2047

. 133 2000

1 472

. 409

, 266 1000 560 8

. 9

= ⋅ =        

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

S ummer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 133.2047 × 0.00275 = 0.3663 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :



# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual employees 48,544 employees burned waste tons

year burned waste ton CO lbs

Emissions CO Annual

9158

. 502 2000

1 68

. 831

, 005

, 1 1000 560 37

= ⋅ =        

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = annu al CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor

### 64 

### Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Summer work weekday CO emissions =502.9158 × 0.00275 = 1.3830 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO em issions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.00275 4



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 502.9158 × 0.00275 = 1.3830 tons CO per day



## STRUCTURE FIRES (SCC 2810030000)

Building fires can produce short

- term emissions of VOC, NO
x 

## , CO, and PM. Structure fire emissions were estimated using emission factors, a loading factor, and a default number of fires per capita (note that PM10

- FIL, PM25

- FIL, and PM

- CON emission factors were not available). Population data were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau. Each county’s emissions were calculated per the following sample calculations.

Annual Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Loading Factor)(Per Capita # of F ires)(Population)

where: VOC Emission Factor = 11 lbs VOC/ton material burned/year 16



## NO
x 

## Emission Factor = 1.4 lbs NO
x 

## /ton material burned/year 16



## CO Emission Factor = 60 lbs CO/ton material burned/year 16 

## Loading Factor = 1.15 tons material/fire 69


## Per Capita Number of Fires = 0.0018 fires/person 70


## Population = 1,269,904 (Allegheny County) 7



## VOC Emissions :



## ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual people
person fires
fire

material tons

year material

tons VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

4560

. 14 2000

1 168

. 912

, 28 904

, 269

, 1 0018

. 0 15

. 1 11

= ⋅ =                

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002427 71



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 14.4560 × 0.002427 = 0.03509 tons VOC per day



## CO Emissions :

### 65 

# ( )

year per CO tons lbs ton year per CO pounds Emissions CO Annual people
person fires
fire

material tons

year material

ton CO lbs

Emissions CO Annual

8514

. 78 2000

1 7342

. 702

, 157 904

, 269

, 1 0018

. 0 15

. 1 60

= ⋅ =                

   

 

   

 

=



### Summer work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.002427 71



### Summer work weekday CO emissions =7 8.8514 × 0.002427 = 0.1914 tons CO per day

Winter work weekday CO emissions = annual CO emissions × winter work weekday allocation factor Winter work weekday allocation factor = 0.003126 71



### Winter work weekday CO emissions = 78.8514 × 0.003126 = 0.2465 tons CO per day



## TRAFFIC LINE PAINTING (SCC 2401008000)

Traffic paints are used to mark pavement in applications such as dividing lines for traffic lanes, parking space markings, crosswalks, and arrows. The mark ings are usually applied by Commonwealth or local highway maintenance crews. VOC emissions result from the evaporation of organic solvents during and shortly after application of the marking paint. Each county’s emissions were calculated per “Alternative Method Three” described in the EIIP emission estimation guidance document for this category. 72 

## The calculation uses a national per capita emission factor based on 2002 data for national traffic paint consumption and U.S. population. Control efficiency, r ule penetration, and rule effectiveness factors were incorporated
into the final calculation.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:



# ( ) ( ) ( )      

⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ = 100 100 100 1 RE RP CE Population Factor Usage Capita Per Factor Emission Emissions VOC Annual



### Population U.S. 2002 n Consumptio Paint Traffic National 2002 Factor Usage Capita Per =



## National per Capita Usage Factor = 39,397,000 gallons 73 7 

## /288,368,698 people National per Capita Usage Factor = 0.1366 gallons/person

where: Emission Factor = 3.36 lbs VOC/gallon 72


## National per Capita Usage Factor = 0.1366 gallons/person Population =1,269,904 (Allegheny County) 7


## CE (Control Efficiency) = 20% 5 

## RP (Rule Penetration) = 100% RE (Rule Effectiveness) = 100%

### 66 

# ( ) ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC pounds Emissions VOC Annual people person gallons
year gallon VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

1767

. 233 2000

1 4473

. 353

, 466 100 100

100 100

100 20 1 904

, 269

, 1 / 1366

. 0 36

. 3

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −   

 

  

 

=



### Summer work wee kday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00356 9 

### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 233.1767 × 0.00356 = 0.8305 tons VOC per day



## TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES (TSDF’S)

This source category applies to industrial wastewater and hazardous waste which is generated in many industry types and sizes and include general waste categories such as contaminated wastewaters, spent solvent re siduals, still bottoms, spent catalysts, electroplating wastes, metal contaminated sludges, degreasing solvents, leaded tank bottoms, separator sludges, and off

specification chemicals. These wastes are generated at an industrial site and treated, stored and/or disposed either on

- site at the industrial facility or off

- site at a commercial facility. Operations involved in treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous wastes include impoundment and tanks, land treatment, landfills and waste piles, transfer an d handling operation, injection wells, incinerators, and organic compound removal devices.

The VOC emission estimates for this source category were developed by E.H. Pechan

company. 26 

## The estimates were derived from EPA Emissions Standard Division estim ates. A growth factor , based on 1990 population and 1999 population projections , was applied to adjust
for 1999 estimates.

WINERIES (SCC 2302070005)

Winery emissions result from the entrainment of ethanol by carbon dioxide during wine
fermentation. F actors affecting ethanol emissions are handling techniques, temperature, process equipment design, and fermenting parameters. Other sources of emissions from the wine making process are blending, transferring, racking and storing of the wine.

Emissions were determined using 2002 county

- level wine production data provided by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB). 74 

## Because monthly production data were available, these data were used to develop the seasonal allocation factors for this category. Th e emission
factors for both red and white wines were obtained from AP

- 42. 75 

## Since the emission factors for the two types of wines are different, but wine type production data are no longer available, wine production in the Commonwealth was assumed to be 60 percent white wine and 40 percent red
wine. 76 

## Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates. Each county’s emissions were estimated per the following sample calculations.

SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULATIONS:

### 67 

## Annua l VOC Emissions = (0.6 × White Wine Emission Factor + 0.4 × Red Wine Emission Factor) × (2002 Total Wine Production)

where: White Wine Emission Factor = 1.80873 lbs VOC/1000 gallons white wine/year 75



## Red Wine Emission Fact or = 4.6236 lbs VOC/1000 gallons red wine/year 75 

## 2002 Total Wine Production = 8.270 thousand gallons (Adams County) 74


## 2002 Summer Wine Production = 3.000 thousand gallons (Adam s County) 74


## White Wine Production Factor = 60% of wine produced 76 

## Red Wine Production Factor = 40% of wine produced 76



# ( )

year per VOC tons lbs ton year per VOC lbs Emissions VOC Annual gallons thousand gallons lbs
gallons lbs Emissions VOC Annual

0121

. 0 2000

1 2698

. 24 270

. 8 1000 6236

. 4 4

. 0 1000 80873

. 1 6

. 0

= ⋅ =        

⋅ +

⋅ =

Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer work weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = summer month wine production/annual wine production × weekday ratio/number of weekdays in summer

Summer work weekday allocation factor = 3.000/8.270 × 0.715/65 = 0.00399 (Adams County) 4 74



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 0.0121 × 0.00399 = 0.0000484 tons VOC per day



## WOOD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING (SCC 2401020000)

This source category includes establishments engaged in the manufacture of wood home or office furniture. VOC emissions result from the evaporation of solvents used in the finish coats and cleanup proced ures. Point source emissions, where present, were subtracted from these emission estimates. Each county’s emissions were calculated according to the sample calculations below using a per employee emission factor and the number of employees in NAICS codes 337122, 337127, 337129, 337211, and 337212. The number of employees in each county for 2001 was
obtained from County Business Patterns 2 

## and grown to 2002 using the ratio of 2002 total Commonwealth employees to 2001 total Commonwealth employees obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 3



## A 30 percent reduction in VOC emissions was assumed based on a RACT

- based regulation. 77



## SAMPLE VOC EMISSION CALCULA TION:

Annual VOC Emissions = (Emission Factor)(Employees)(30% Control Efficiency Reduction)

### 68 

## where: Emission Factor = 1,311 lbs VOC/employee/year 78


## Employees = 256 employees (Allegheny County) 2 3


## Control Efficiency = 30% 77



## Rule Penetration = 100% Rule Effectiveness = 80%



# ( )

year per VOC tons

. lbs ton year per VOC pounds

. , Emissions VOC Annual employees
year employee VOC lbs

Emissions VOC Annual

5341 127 2000

1 16 068 255 100 80

100 100

100 30 1 256 1311

= ⋅ =      

⋅ ⋅ −   

 

  

 

=



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = annual VOC emissions × summer wo rk weekday allocation factor Summer work weekday allocation factor = 0.00277 4



### Summer work weekday VOC emissions = 127.5341 × 0.00277 = 0.3539 tons VOC per day

### A

- 1 

# APPENDIX A: REFERENCES

1 

### Eastern Research Group, Inc., “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area Sources, Chapter 1, Introduction to Area Source Emission Inventory Development (Revised Final),” prepared for the Area Sources Committee, Emission Inventory Improvement Program, January 2001. (Note: Because this inventory was prepared prior to November 2005, the Commonwealth did not apply the rule effectivness guidance found in

EPA

- 454/P

- 05

- 001)
2 

### U.S . Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, County Business Patterns 2001, Pennsylvania , available

from http://www.census.gov/epcd/cbp/view/cbpview.html. 2003 , accessed October 200 3.

3 

### U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics , available from http://www.bls.gov/cew/home.htm

, accessed November 2003.

4 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Temporal Allocation Data, ” Emissions Modeling Clearinghouse,
available from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/temporal/ , accessed November 2003.

5 

### 63 FR 48848, 1998: Federal Register , "National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Architectural Coatings, Final Rule, Volume 63, Number 176, September 11, 1998.

6 

### U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 

## “ Table 2: 2002 Architectural Coating Shipments,” Current Industrial Reports, Paint and Allied Produc ts: 2002 , available from http://www.census.gov/industry/1/ma325f02.pdf ), accessed October 2003.

7 

### U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, “County Population Estimates Data Sets,” av ailable from http://eire.census.gov/popest/estimates_dataset.php , accessed November 2003.

8 

### Eastern Research Group, “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, A rea Sources, Chapter 3, Architectural Surface Coating,” prepared for the Area Sources Committee, Emission Inventory Improvement Program, November 1995.

9 

### E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., Control Measure Development Support Analysis of Ozone Transport Commi ssion
Model Rules , prepared for the Ozone Transport Commission, March 2001.

10 

### Glen Heilman, Pennsylvania Association of Asphalt Material Applicators, personal communication with Andrea Ramsey, E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., February 2004.

11 

### Eastern Resear ch Group, Inc., “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area Sources, Chapter 17, Asphalt Paving (Revised Final),” prepared for the Area Sources Committee, Emission Inventory Improvement Program, January 2001.

12 

### Dan Szekeres, Michael Baker Corporation, personal communication with Andy Bollman, E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., December 2003.

13 

### 25 Pa. Code Section 129.64, “Cutback Asphalt Paving,” available from http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.64.html , accessed February 2004.

14 

### Dan Szekeres, Michael Baker Corporation, personal communication with Andy Bollman, E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., December 2003.

15 

### Steve Fulk, Pennsylvan ia Association of Asphalt Material Applicators, personal communication with Andrea Ramsey, E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., February, 2004.

16 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Procedures for the Preparation of Emission Inventories for Carbon Monoxide and Precursors of Ozone, Volume 1, General Guidance for Stationary Sources , EPA

- 450/4

- 91

- 016, May 1991.

17 

### 25 Pa. Code Section 129.75, “ Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing.” available from http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.75.html , accessed January 2004.

18 

### 63 FR 48806, 1998: Federal Register , “National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Automobile

R efinish Coatings, Final Rule,” Volume 63, Number 176, September 11, 1998.

19 

### Lucy Adams, Radian Corporation, memorandum to SIP inventory preparers and EPA Regions, “ VOC Emissions
from Bakeries ,” prepared under contract to the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA Contract No. 68

- D0

- 0125), April 24, 1992.

20 

### Monthly statewide beer production data from Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, available from http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/stats/02stats/02beerstats.htm , accessed December 2003.

21 

### Brewery emission factor is the sum of individual brewery process emission factors found in Table 4

- 2 of Emission Factor Documentation for AP

- 42 Section 9.12.1: Malt Beverages, Final Report , prepared by Midwest Research

### A

- 2 Institute October 1996 and available from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch09/bgdocs/b9s12

- 1.pdf , accessed
Febr uary 2004.

22 

### Brewery emission factor is the sum of individual brewery process emission factors found in Table 4

- 3 of Emission Factor Documentation for AP

- 42 Section 9.12.1: Malt Beverages, Final Report , prepared by Midwest Research
Institute October 1996 a nd available from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch09/bgdocs/b9s12

- 1.pdf , accessed February 2004.

23 

### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Climatological Data: Pennsyl vania July

- December 2002 (Volume 107, Numbers 07

- 12), published by National Climatic Data Center, 2003.

24 

### U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, "Table H40

- House Heating Fuel Type", Census 2000: Summary File 3 , [Data file], March 2003.

25 

### U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, State Energy Data, Pennsylvania , available from www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/main_pa.html. 2003 , accessed November 2003.

26 

### U.S. Department of Energy, E nergy Information Administration, Annual Coal Report 2002, DOE/EIA

- 0584 (2002), 2003

. 27 

### Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., “Final Summary of the Development and Results of a Methodology for Calculating Area Source Emissions from R esidential Fuel Combustion,” prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, September 2002.

28 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Factor Information Retrieval Data System (FIRE) 6.23 , October 2000.

29 

### 63 F R 48819, 1998: Federal Register , “National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Consumer Products, Final Rule,” Volume 63, Number 176, September 11, 1998.

30 

### Eastern Research Group, “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volum e III, Area Sources, Chapter 6, Solvent Cleaning,” prepared for the Area Sources Committee, Emission Inventory Improvement Program, September 1997.

31 

### E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., “Documentation for the 2002 Nonpoint Source National Emission Inventory fo r Criteria and Hazardous Air Pollutants ,” prepared for Emission Factor and Inventory Group, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2002inventory.html , (fo rthcoming).

32 

### Public Research Institute, “Charbroiling Activity Estimation, Draft Report,” prepared for California Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board, March 2003.

33 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Pl anning and Standards, “Methods for Developing a National Emission Inventory for Commercial Cooking Processes: Technical Memorandum,” prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., September 2003.

34 

### BioCycle, 2000. “2000 BioCycle National Survey

– Solid Waste Composting Trends in the U.S.”, BioCycle,
November 2000.

35 

### Eastern Research Group, ““Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area Sources, Chapter 5, Consumer and Commercial Solvent Use,” prepared for the Area Sources Committe e, Emission Inventory Improvement Program, August 1996.

36 

### 25 Pa. Code Section 129.63, “ Degreasing Operations,” available from http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s12 9.63.html , accessed January 2004.

37 

### Federal Register , “Subpart T

— National Emission Standards for Halogenated Solvent Cleaning,” Volume 59, Number 2331, December 2, 1994.

38 

### The Pennsylvania Dry Cleaners Association disclosed that 1.8 million pounds of VOCs were emitted in Pennsylvania in 1990 from dry cleaning operations. Emission Factor = Total VOC emitted ÷ Pennsylvania Population = 1.8 million lbs VOC ÷ 11.88 million people (1990 census) = 0.15 lbs VOC/person/year

39 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources , AP

- 42, Fifth Edition, January 1995.

40 

### E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., “ Documentation for the Draft 1999 National Emi ssions Inventory (Version 3.0) for Criteria Air Pollutants and Ammonia: Area Sources,” prepared for Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emission Factor and Inventory Group, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March 2003. Available from ftp://ftp.epa.gov/pub/EmisInventory/draftnei99ver3/criteria/documentation/area/ardoc_99nei_draftv3_0303.pdf

, accessed February 2004.

41 

### Sta n Piorkowski, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Forestry, personal communication with PJ Disclafani, E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., December 2003.

### A

- 3 42 

### U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Fuel Oil and Kerosene Sales, 2002 , available
from http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/fuel_oil_and_kerosene_sales/foks.html

, accessed
November 2003.

43 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, median sulfur content reported in the 1999 National Emissions Inventory,
available from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/c hief/net/1999inventory.html#final3crit , accessed October 2003.

44 

### Dan Szekeres, Michael Baker Corporation, personal communication with Maureen Mullen, E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., February 2004.

45 

### Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, Bureau of Motor Fue l Taxes, “Monthly Report of Gallons” for 2002, provided by Paul Sload, December 2003.

46 

### 25 Pa. Code Section 129.60, “ Bulk Gasoline Plants,” available from http://www.pacode.com/s ecure/data/025/chapter129/s129.60.html , accessed February 2004.

47 

### 25 Pa. Code Section 129.61, “Small Gasoline Storage Tank Control (Stage I Control),” available from http://www. pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.61.html , accessed February 2004.

48 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “User’s Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile Source Emission Factor Model,” EPA420

- R

- 02

- 028, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Offi ce of Transportation and Air Quality, October 2002.

49 

### 25 Pa. Code Section 129.82. “Control of VOCs from Gasoline Dispensing Facilities (Stage II),” available from http://www.pac ode.com/secure/data/025/chapter129/s129.82.html , accessed February 2004.

50 

### 25 Pa. Code Section 129.59. “ Bulk Gasoline Terminals,” available from http://www.pacode.com/secure/dat a/025/chapter129/s129.59.html , accessed February 2004.

51 

### U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Marketing Annual 2001 , available
from http://tonto.eia.d oe.gov/FTPROOT/petroleum/048701.pdf , accessed November 2003.

52 

### U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Marketing Annual 2002, available
from http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/petroleum_marketing_annual/pma.html , accessed
November 2003.

53 

### U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, “Pennsylvania Natural Gas Long Summary,”

a vailable from http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_spa_a_d.htm . accessed November 2003.

54 

### U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, “Pennsylvania Natural Gas Residential Consumption,” available from http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n3010pa2M.htm , accessed November 2003.

55 

### U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, “ Natural Gas Deliveries to Commercial Consumers in Pennsylvania,” available from http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n3020pa2M.htm , accessed
November 2003.

56 

### E.H. Pechan & Associates, In c., “Open Burning in Residential Areas, Emissions Inventory Development Report,” prepared for Mid

- Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union, January 31, 2004.

57 

### Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, “Summary of the Methodology Used to Determine

Vo latile Organic Compounds, Nitrogen Oxides, and Carbon Monoxide Emissions by Source Type for Calendar Year 1999 in Pennsylvania,” no date reported.

58 

### U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, “Agricultural Statistics Database , Crops County Data,” available from http://www.nass.usda.gov:81/ipedb/ , accessed October 2003.

59 

### California Air Resources Board, Public Meeting to Consider Approval of California’s Portable Gasoline

Cont ainer Emissions Inventory , September 1999.

60 

### U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2002 American Community Survey , available from http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Products/Profiles/Si ngle/2002/ACS/PA.htm , accessed February 2004.

61 

### U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census 2000 , available from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable?_bm=y&

- geo_id=04000US42&

- _box_head_nbr=GCT

- H6&

- ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&

- _lang=en&

- redoLog=false&

- format=ST

- 2&

- mt_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_GCTH6_US9&

- _sse=o n , accessed February 2004.

62 

### Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., MarketPlace CD

- ROM, Jan.

- Mar., 2002, April 2002.

63 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Draft NONROAD2002a, [Computer software]. Available June 16, 2003 at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/nonroadmdl.htm

. 64 

### Pechan. Estimating Ammonia Emissions from Anthropogenic Sources

– Draft Report, prepared for the US EPA, Emissions Inventory Improvement Program, prepared by E.H.Pechan & Ass o ciates, Inc.
March 2004.

### A

- 4 65 

### Pechan. Technical Memorandum: MANE

- VU 2002 Ammonia Emissions Inventory for Miscellaneous Sources

– Final, prepared for MARAMA by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. March, 2004.

66 

### U.S. Department of Commerce, Burea u of the Census, County Business Patterns 2001, Pennsylvania, available from http://www.census.gov/epcd/cbp/view/cbpview.html. 2003 , accessed October 2003.

67 

### U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, “Clean Watersheds Needs Survey 2000,” Office of Wastewater Management, available from http://cfpub.epa.gov/cwns/ , accessed December 2003.

68 

### JG Press, Inc. “2000 Biocycle National Survey

– Solid Waste Composting Trends in the U.S.” BioCycle, Vol. 41 Issue 11, November 2000

. 69 

### Eastern Research Group, “Emission Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area Sources, Chapter 18, Structure Fires,” prepared for Area Sources Committee, Emis sion Inventory Improvement Program, January 2001.

70 

### National Fire Protection Association, Fire Loss in the United States During 2002 , September 2003.

71 

### U.S. Fire Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Fire Data Center, Fire in the Un ited
States: 1987

- 1996 , August 1999, available from http://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/fius11th.pdf

, accessed December 2003.

72 

### Eastern Research Group, “Emiss ion Inventory Improvement Program, Document Series, Volume III, Area Sources, Chapter 14, Traffic Markings” prepared for Area Sources Committee, Emission Inventory Improvement Program, May 1997.

73 

### U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census , Current Industrial Reports: Paint and Allied Products:
2002 , MA325F(02)

- 1, July 2003.

74 

### Susan Rose, Office of Planning and Policy Management, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, personal communication with PJ Disclafani, E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., December 200 3.

75 

### From Table 9.12.2

- 1 of emission factor documentation for AP

- 42 Section 9.12.2 Wines and Brandy , October 1995, available from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch09/final/c9s12

- 2. pdf , accessed February 2004.

76 

### Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board figures showing Pennsylvania wine production in 1990.

77 

### 30 Pa.B 2995, 2000: Pennsylvania Bulletin , "Surface Coating Processes," Volume 30, Number 24, Harrisburg, PA, June 10, 2000.

78 

### “Short List” of AMS SCCs and Emission Factors. July 1992.

# Development of Emission Projections
For 2009, 2012, and 2018 For NonEGU Point, Area, and Nonroad Source s In the MANE

- VU Region Final Report February , 2007

## About MARAMA

The Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association is a n associ ation of ten state and local
air pollution control agencies. MARAMA's mission is to streng t hen the skills and capabilities of
member agencies and to help them work together to prevent and reduce air pollution impacts in

the Mid

- Atlantic Region.

MARAMA pro vides cost

- effective approaches to regional collaboration by pooling resources to
develop and analyze data, share ideas, and train staff to implement common requirements.

The following State and Local governments are MARAMA members: Delaware, the District of
Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia,
Philadelphia, and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.

For copies of this report contact:

MARAMA

Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association

711 West 40 th



## Sui te 312 Street

Baltimore, MD 21211
phone 410.467.0170

fax 410.467.1737

http://www.marama.org/

About MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc.

MACTEC, Inc. is a leader in the engineering, environmental and remedial construction

industr ies. MACTEC provides premier management, technical, and professional services to help
clients successfully manage complex businesses, projects, and facilities. MACTEC Federal
Programs, Inc. is a division of MACTEC that provides these same services tailor ed to meet the
unique needs of government agencies, including state/local agencies and federal agencies.

# Development of Emission Projections

for 2009

, 2012 , and 2018

f or NonEGU Point, Area, and Nonroad Sources

i n the MANE

- VU Region

Final Technical Suppo rt Document

Prepared for:

Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA)

Prepared by:

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc.

February 28

, 200 7

______________________ ______________________

Edward Sabo Douglas A. Toothman

Principal Scientist Principal EngineerFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Page i

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# Table of Contents

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMAR Y

................................ ................................ ................................ . 1

- 1

2.0 NONEGU POINT SOU RCES

................................ ................................ ............................ 2

- 1

2.1 INITIAL 2002 POINT SOURCE EMISSION INVENTORY

................................ ..... 2

- 1

2.2 NONEGU POINT SOURCE GROWTH FACTORS

................................ .................. 2

- 3

2.2.1 EGAS 5.0 Growth Factors

................................ ................................ ....................... 2

- 3

2.2.2 AEO2005 Growth Factors

................................ ................................ ....................... 2

- 4

2.2.3 State Specific Growth Factors

................................ ................................ ................. 2

- 5

2.2.3.1 Connecticut

................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 2

- 5

2.2.3.2 Delaware

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 2

- 5

2.2.3.3 District of Columbia

................................ ................................ ........................ 2

- 5

2.2.3.4 Maine

................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 2

- 5

2.2.3.5 Maryland

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 2

- 6

2.2.3.6 Massachusetts

................................ ................................ ................................ .. 2

- 6

2.2.3.7 New Hampshire

................................ ................................ ............................... 2

- 6

2.2.3.8 New Jersey

................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 2

- 6

2.2.3.9 New York

................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 2

- 6

2.2.3.10 Pennsylvania

................................ ................................ ................................ .... 2

- 6

2.2.3.11 Rhode Island

................................ ................................ ................................ .... 2

- 7

2.2.3.12 Vermont

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 2

- 7

2.3 NONEGU POINT SOURCE CONTROL FACTORS

................................ ................. 2

- 7

2.3.1 NOx SIP Call Phase I

................................ ................................ .............................. 2

- 8

2.3.2 NOx SIP Call Phase II

................................ ................................ ............................. 2

- 8

2.3.3 NOx RACT in 1

- hour Ozone SIPs

................................ ................................ ............ 2

- 8

2.3.4 NOx OTC 2001 Model Rule for ICI Boil ers

................................ ............................ 2

- 9

2.3.5 2

- , 4

- , 7

- , and 10

- year MACT Standards

................................ ................................ . 2

- 9

2.3.6 Combustion Turbine and RICE MACT

................................ ................................ .. 2

- 10

2.3.7 Industrial Boiler/Process Heater MACT

................................ ............................... 2

- 10

2.3.8 Refinery Enforcement Initiative

................................ ................................ ............. 2

- 10

2.3.9 Source Shutdowns

................................ ................................ ................................ .. 2

- 12

2.3.10 State Specific Control Factors

................................ ................................ ........... 2

- 12

2.4 NONEGU POINT SOURCE QA/QC REVIEW

................................ ........................ 2

- 12

2.5 NONEGU POINT SOURCE NIF AND SMOKE FILES

................................ ........... 2

- 14

2.6 NONEGU POINT SOURCE EMISSION SUMMARIES

................................ ......... 2

- 14

3.0 AREA SOURCES

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 3

- 1Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Page ii

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 3.1 INITIAL 2002 AREA SOURCE EMISSION INVENTORY

................................ ...... 3

- 1

3.2 AREA SOURCE GROWTH FACTORS

................................ ................................ ..... 3

- 2

3.2.1 EGAS 5.0 Growth Factors

................................ ................................ ....................... 3

- 3

3.2.2 AEO2005 Growth Factors

................................ ................................ ....................... 3

- 3

3.2.3 State Specific Growth Factors

................................ ................................ ................. 3

- 4

3.2.3.1 Connecticut

................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 3

- 4

3.2.3.2 Delaware

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 3

- 4

3.2.3.3 District of Columbia

................................ ................................ ........................ 3

- 5

3.2.3.4 Maine

................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 3

- 5

3.2.3.5 Maryland

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 3

- 5

3.2.3.6 Massachusetts

................................ ................................ ................................ .. 3

- 5

3.2.3.7 New Hampshire

................................ ................................ ............................... 3

- 5

3.2.3.8 New Jersey

................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 3

- 5

3.2.3.9 New York

................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 3

- 5

3.2.3.10 Pennsylvania

................................ ................................ ................................ .... 3

- 6

3.2.3.11 Rhode Island

................................ ................................ ................................ .... 3

- 6

3.2.3.12 Vermont

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 3

- 6

3.3 AREA SOURCE CONTROL FACTORS

................................ ................................ .... 3

- 6

3.3.1 OTC 2001 VOC M odel Rules

................................ ................................ ................... 3

- 7

3.3.2 On

- Board Vapor Recovery

................................ ................................ .................... 3

- 10

3.3.3 Post

- 2002 Area Source Controls in New Jersey

................................ .................... 3

- 11

3.3.4 Residential Wood Combustion

................................ ................................ ............... 3

- 12

3.4 AREA SOURCE QA/QC REVIEW

................................ ................................ .......... 3

- 12

3.5 AREA SOUR CE NIF, SMOKE AND SUMMARY FILES

................................ ....... 3

- 13

3.6 AREA SOURCE EMISSION SUMMARIES

................................ ............................ 3

- 13

4.0 NONROAD SOURCES

................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 4

- 1

4.1 NONROAD MODEL SOURCES

................................ ................................ ................ 4

- 1

4.2 AIRCRAFT, COMMERCIAL MARINE, AND LOCOMOTIVES

............................ 4

- 2

4.2.1 Ma ryland Non

- NONROAD Source Emissions

................................ ......................... 4

- 3

4.2.2 DC Locomotive Emissions

................................ ................................ ....................... 4

- 4

4.2.3 Logan (Boston) Airport Emissions

................................ ................................ .......... 4

- 4

4.3 NONROAD QA/QC REVIEW

................................ ................................ .................... 4

- 4

4.4 NONROAD NIF, SMOKE, AND SUMMARY FILES

................................ ............... 4

- 5

4.5 NONROAD EMISSION SUMMARIES

................................ ................................ ..... 4

- 5

5.0 BEYOND

- ON

- THE

- WAY EMISSION INVENTO RY

................................ .................... 5

- 1

5.1 NONEGU POINT SOURCES

................................ ................................ ..................... 5

- 2Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Page iii

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 5.1.1 Adhesives and Sealants Application

................................ ................................ ........ 5

- 7

5.1.2 Asphalt Production Plants

................................ ................................ ....................... 5

- 7

5. 1.3 Cement Kilns

................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 5

- 8

5.1.4 Glass and Fiberglass Furnaces

................................ ................................ ............... 5

- 8

5.1.5 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers

................................ ................... 5

- 8

5.1.6 Commercial and Institutional Heating Oil

................................ ............................ 5

- 10

5.1.7 BOTW NonEGU Point Source NIF, SMOKE, and Summary Files

....................... 5

- 10

5.1.8 BOTW NonEGU Point Source Emission Summaries

................................ ............. 5

- 10

5.2 AREA SOURCES

................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 5

- 19

5.2. 1 Adhesives and Sealants

................................ ................................ .......................... 5

- 19

5.2.2 Asphalt Paving

................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 5

- 23

5.2.3 Consumer Products

................................ ................................ ................................ 5

- 23

5.2.4 Portable Fuel Containers

................................ ................................ ...................... 5

- 24

5.2.5 Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers

................................ .......................... 5

- 25

5.2.6 Residentia l and Commercial Heating Oil

................................ .............................. 5

- 26

5.2.7 BOTW Area Source NIF, SMOKE, and Summary Files

................................ ........ 5

- 26

5.2.8 BOTW Area Source Emission Summ aries

................................ ............................. 5

- 26

5.3 N ONROAD 

## M OBILE 

## S OURCES



## ................................ ................................ ...................... 5

- 35

5.4 E LECTRIC 

## G ENERATING 

## U NITS



## ................................ ................................ ................... 5

- 35

5.5 O NROAD 

## M OBILE 

## S OURCES



## ................................ ................................ ........................ 5

- 35

List of Appendices

Appendix A

- NonEGU Point Source Growth Factors
Appendix B

- NonEGU Point Source Control Factors
Appendix C

- Area Source Growth Factors
Appendix D

- Area Sou rce Control Factors
Appendix E

– BOTW NonEGU Point and Area S ource Control FactorsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Page iv

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## List of Tables

Figure 1

- 1 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual CO Emissions

Table 1

- 1 Summary of MANE

- VU Area, NonEGU, and Nonroad Emission Inventory by Pollutant, Sector , and Year

Table 2

- 1 NonEGU Point Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

Table 2

- 2 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections

Table 2

- 3 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections

Table 2

- 4 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW An nual NOx Emission Projections

Table 2

- 5 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections

Table 2

- 6 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emission Projections

Table 2

- 7 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections

Ta ble 2

- 8 NonEGU Point Source OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections

Table 3

- 1 Adoption Matrix for 2001 OTC Model Rules

Table 3

- 2 Rule Penetration and Control Efficiency Values for 2001 OTC Model Rule for

PFCs

Table 3

- 3 Area Source NIF, IDA, and Summary F ile Names

Table 3

- 4 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections

Table 3

- 5 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections

Table 3

- 6 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections

Table 3

- 7 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Pro jections

Table 3

- 8 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emission Projections

Table 3

- 9 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections

Table 3

- 10 Area Source OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections

Table 4

- 1 Nonroad Source NIF, IDA, and Summary Fil e Names

Table 4

- 2 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections

Table 4

- 2 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections

Table 4

- 2 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projecti ons Table 4

- 3 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual NH3 E mission Projections

Table 4

- 3 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections

Table 4

- 3 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW

Annual NH3 Emission Projectio ns Table 4

- 4 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections

Table 4

- 4 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections

Table 4

- 4c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projectio nsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Page v

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## List of Tables (cont.)

Table 4

- 5 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections

Table 4

- 5 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections

Table 4

- 5 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OT B/OTW

Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections

Table 4

- 6 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emission Projections

Table 4

- 6 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emission Projections

Table 4

- 6 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Ves sel Sources OTB/OTW

Annual PM25

- PRI Emission Projections

Table 4

- 7 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections

Table 4

- 7 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections

Table 4

- 7 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW

Annual SO2 Emission Projections

Table 4

- 8 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections

Table 4

- 8 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections

Table 4

- 8 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Vessel Sources OTB/OTW

Annual VOC Emission Projections

Table 5

- 1 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW Regiona l Modeling

– NOx Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Table 5

- 2 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW Regiona l Modeling

– NOx Emissions from ICI Boilers

Table 5

- 3 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW Regiona l Modeling

– SO2 Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Table 5

- 4 State Staff Recommendations for Control M easures to Include in BOTW Regiona l Modeling

– VOC Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Table 5

- 5 BOTW NonEGU NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

Table 5

- 6 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual CO Emission Projections

Table 5

- 7 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/ OTW and BOTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections

Table 5

- 8 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NOx Emission Projections

Table 5

- 9 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM10 Emission Projections

Table 5

- 10 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW A nnual PM2.5 Emission Projections

Table 5

- 11 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections

Table 5

- 12 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual VOC Emission ProjectionsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Page vi

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## List of Tables (cont.)

Table 5

- 13 State Staff Recommendatio ns for Control Measures to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling

– NOx Emissions from Area Sources

Table 5

- 14 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling

– SO2 Emissions from Area Sources

Table 5

- 15 State Staff Recomme ndations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling

– VOC Emissions from Area Sources

Table 5

- 16 BOTW Area Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

Table 5

- 17 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual CO Emission Projections

Table 5

- 18 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections

Table 5

- 19 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NOx Emission Projections

Table 5

- 20 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM10 Emission Projections

Table 5

- 21 Area Point Sources OTB/ OTW and BOTW Annual PM2.5 Emission Projections

Table 5

- 22 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections

Table 5

- 23 Area Point Sources OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual VOC Emission ProjectionsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Page vii

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## List of Figures

Figure 1

- 1 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual CO Emissions Figure 1

- 2 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual NH3 E missions Figure 1

- 3 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual NOx Emissions Figure 1

- 4 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual SO2 Emissions Figure 1

- 5 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual PM10 Emissions Figure 1

- 6 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual PM2.5 Emissions Figure 1

- 7 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual VOC EmissionsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Page viii

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# A cronyms and Abbreviations

Acronym Description

AEO Annual Energy Outlook

BOTW Beyond

- on

- the

- Way emission controls

CAI R Clean Air Interstate Rule

EGAS 5.0 Economic Growth Analysis System Version 5.0

EGU Electric Generating Unit

EIA Energy Information Agency

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

IDA Inventory Data Analyzer (data format used by SMOKE modeling system )

IPM Integrated Planning Model

MANE

- VU Mid

- Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union

MARAMA Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association

MOBILE6 U.S. EPA’s emission model for onroad sources

NESCAUM Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management

N H 3 Ammonia

NIF3.0 National Emission Inventory Input Format Version 3.0

NMIM National Mobile Inventory Model

NONROAD U.S. EPA’s emission model for certain types of nonroad equipment

NO x Oxides of nitrogen

OTB/OTW On

- the

- Books/On

- the

- Way

OTC Ozone Tra nsport Commission

PM10

- PRI Particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter that includes both the
filterable and condensable components of particulate matter

PM25

- PRI Particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter that i ncludes both
the filterable and condensable components of particulate matter

SIC Standard Industrial Classification code

SIP State Implementation Plan

SCC Source Classification Code



## SMOKE Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions Modeling System

SO2 Sul fur dioxide

VOC Volatile organic compoundsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 1

– Executive Summary Page 1

- 1

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report was prepared for the Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association
(MARAMA) as part of an effort to assist states in develo ping State Implementation Plans (SIPs)

for ozone , fine particles, and regional haze

. It describes the data sources, methods, and results

for emission forecast s f or three years , three emission sectors, two emission control scenarios;
seven pollutants, and 11 states plus the District of Columbia . The followin g is a summary of the
future year inventories that were developed :

• The three projection years are 2009, 2012, and 2018.

• The three source sectors are non

- Electric Generating Units (non

- EGUs), area sources,
and nonroad mobile sources. (Note: under separate efforts, MANE

- VU prepared E GU
project ions using the Integrated Planning Model {IPM} and onroad mobile source
projections using the SMOKE emission modeling system).

• The two emission control scenarios are : a) a combined “on

- the

- books /on

- the

- way ”
(OTB/W) con trol strategy accounting for emission control regulations already in place as

well as emission control regulations that are not yet finalized but are likely to achieve
additional reductions by 2009; and b ) a “ beyond

- on

- the

- way” (BOTW) scenarios to

account for controls from potential new regulations that may be necessary to meet
attainment and other regional air quality goals.

• The seven pollutants are sulfur dioxide ( SO2 ), oxides of nitrogen ( NOx ), volatile organic
compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), part iculate matter less than or equal to 10
microns in diameter that includes both the filterable and condensable components of
particulate matter (PM10

- PRI), particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in

diameter that includes both the filterable an d condensable components of particulate
matter (PM25

- PRI), and ammonia (NH3).

• The states are those that comprise the Mid

- Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE

VU) region. In addition to the District of Columbia, the 11 MANE

- VU states are
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey,
New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

T he results of the emission projections are s ummarized in Table 1

- 1 and Figures 1

- 1 to 1

- 7

. Section 2 of this report describes how t he nonEGU OTB/W emission projections were made.
Section 3 describes the methods for the area source emission projections. Section 4 describes the
methods for the nonroad section, including sources accounted for by the NONROAD model as
well as aircraft, l ocomotives, and marine vessels. Section 5 describes the development of the
BOTW emission projections.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 1

– Executive Summary Page 1

- 2

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 1

- 1 Summary of MANE

- VU Area, NonEGU, and Nonroad Emission Inventory by Pollutant, Sector, and Year Annual Emissions (tons per year)

Pollutant Sector 2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CO Area 1,326,796 1,283,959 1,283,959 1,260,627 1,260,627 1,211,727 1,211,727

NonEGU 295,577 328,546 328,546 346,090 346,090 412,723 412,723

Nonroad 4,553,124 4,969,925 4,96 9,925 5,099,538 5,099,538 5,401,353 5,401,353

6,175,497 6,582,430 6,582,430 6,706,255 6,706,255 7,025,803 7,025,803

NH3 Area 249,795 294,934 294,934 312,419 312,419 341,746 341,746

NonEGU 3,916 4,301 4,301 4,448 4,448 4,986 4,986

Nonroad 287 31 7 317 337 337 369 369

253,998 299,552 299,552 317,204 317,204 347,101 347,101

NOx Area 265,400 278,038 265,925 281,659 261,057 284,535 263,030

NonEGU 207,048 210,522 185,658 218,137 184,527 237,802 199,732

Nonroad 431,631 354,850 354,850 321,93 5 321,935 271,185 271,185

904,079 843,410 806,433 821,731 767,519 793,522 733,947

PM10 Area 1,452,309 1,527,586 1,527,586 1,556,316 1,550,400 1,614,476 1,607,602

NonEGU 51,280 55,869 55,869 57,848 57,624 63,757 63,524

Nonroad 40,114 34,453 34,4 53 32,445 32,445 27,059 27,059

1,543,703 1,617,908 1,617,908 1,646,609 1,640,469 1,705,292 1,698,185

PM2.5 Area 332,521 340,049 340,049 341,875 336,779 345,419 339,461

NonEGU 33,077 36,497 36,497 37,625 37,444 41,220 41,029

Nonroad 36,084 30,79 1 30,791 28,922 28,922 23,938 23,938

401,682 407,337 407,337 408,422 403,145 410,577 404,428

SO2 Area 286,921 304,018 304,018 305,339 202,058 305,437 190,431

NonEGU 264,377 249,658 249,658 255,596 253,638 270,433 268,330

Nonroad 57,257 15,651 1 5,651 8,731 8,731 8,643 8,643

608,555 569,327 569,327 569,666 464,427 584,513 467,404

VOC Area 1,528,269 1,398,982 1,363,278 1,382,803 1,339,851 1,387,882 1,334,039

NonEGU 91,278 92,279 91,718 96,887 96,260 110,524 109,762

Nonroad 572,751 460,9 22 460,922 424,257 424,257 380,080 380,080

2,192,298 1,952,183 1,915,918 1,903,947 1,860,368 1,878,486 1,823,881

OTB/W

– on

- the

- books/way scenario; BOTW

– beyond

- on

- the

- way scenarioFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 1

– Executive Summary Page 1

- 3

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Figure 1

- 1 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual CO Emissions (to ns per year)

0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000

2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWTons/Year 

### Nonroad

NonEGU

Area



## Figure 1

- 2 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual NH3 Emissions (tons per year)

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000

2002 2009

OTB/W 2009

BOTW 2012

OTB/W 2012

BOTW 2018

OTB/W 2018

BOTWTons/Year 

### Nonroad

NonEGU

AreaFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 1

– Executive Summary Page 1

- 4

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Figure 1

- 3 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual NOx Emissions (tons per year)

0 250,000 500,000 750,000 1,000,000

2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWTons/Year 

### Nonroad

NonEGU

Area



## Figure 1

- 4 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual SO2 Emissions (ton s per year)

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000

2002 2009

OTB/W 2009

BOTW 2012

OTB/W 2012

BOTW 2018

OTB/W 2018

BOTWTons/Year 

### Nonroad

NonEGU

AreaFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 1

– Executive Summary Page 1

- 5

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Figure 1

- 5 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual PM10 Emissions (tons per year)

0 400,000 800,000 1,200,000 1,600,000 2,000,000

2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWTons/Year 

### Nonroad

NonEGU

Area



## Figure 1

- 6 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual PM2.5 Emissions (tons per year)

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000

2002 2009

OTB/W 2009

BOTW 2012

OTB/W 2012

BOTW 2018

OTB/W 2018

BOTWTons/Year 

### Nonroad

NonEGU

AreaFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 1

– Executive Summary Page 1

- 6

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Figure 1

- 7 2002 Base Year, OTB/OTW AND BOTW Annual VOC Emissions (t ons per year)

0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000

2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWTons/Year 

### Nonroad

NonEGU

AreaFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 1

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# 2.0 NONEGU POINT SOURCES

Under ideal circumstances, all stationary sources would be considered point sources for
purposes of emission inventories. In practical applications, however, only sources that
emit more than a specified cutoff lev el of pollutant are considered point sources. In
general, the MANE

- VU point source inventory includes only major sources (i.e., those
required to obtain a Title V operating permit). Some states may include additional
stationary sources that emit below th e major source thresholds.

For emission projection purposes, the point source inventory is divided into two sub

sectors

– the Electric Generating Unit (EGU) sector and the non

- EGU sector

– because

different projections methods are used for these two sector s. For EGUs, MANE

- VU used
the Integrated Planning Model (IPM) to project future generation as well as to calculate the
impact of future control programs on future emission levels

.

The procedures for projectin g emissions for non

- EGUs are described in thi s section. W e

started with the MANE

- VU 2002 point source emission inventory , which contains data for
both EGUs and nonEGUs. We implemented a procedure to split the 2002 point source
inventory into two components

– and EGU inventory for those units accoun ted for in IPM,
and a nonEGU inventory for those point sources not accounted for in IPM. For the

nonEGU sources, we first applied growth factors to account for changes in economic
activity. Next, we applied control factors to account for future emission reductions from

on

- the

- books (OTB) control regulations and on

- the

- way (OTW) control regulations . The
OTB control scenario accounts for post

- 2002 emission reductions from promulgated

federal, State, local, and site

- specific control programs as of Ju ne 15

, 200 5 . The OTW
control scenario accounts for proposed (but not final) control programs that are reasonably
anticipated to result in post

- 2002 emission reductions. We then conducted a series of
quality assurance steps to ensure the development of complete, accurate, and consistent

emission inventories. We provided the inventories in three formats

– the National
Emission Inventory Input Format (NIF), SMOKE Inventory Data Analyzer (IDA) format,
and SMOKE growth/control packets. We also prepared emission sum mary tables by state
and pollutant. Each of these activities is discussed in this section.

2.1 INITIAL 2002 POINT SOURCE EMISSION INVENTORY

The starting point for the nonEGU projections was Version 3 of the MANE

- VU 2002 point
source emission inventory ( MANE

- VU _2002_Pt_Version 3_040706. MDB). Since this
file contains both EGUs and nonEGU point sources, and EGU emissions are projected
using the IPM, it was necessary to split the 2002 point source file into two components.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 2

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## The first component contains those em ission units accounted for in the IPM forecasts. The
second component contains all other point sources not accounted for in IPM.

The MANE

- VU 2002 point source inventory contains a cross

- reference table (xwalk
{ MANE

- VU }) that matches IPM emission unit iden tifiers (ORISPL plant code and BLRID
emission unit code) to MANE

- VU NIF emission unit identifiers (FIPSST state code,
FIPSCNTY county code, State Plant ID, State Point ID). Initially, we used this cross

reference table to split the point source file into the EGU and nonEGU components. When

there was a match between the IPM ORISPL/BLRID and the MANE

- VU emission unit ID,
the unit was assigned to the EGU inventory; all other emission units were assigned to the
nonEGU inventory. The exception to this rule wa s for the State of New York. The cross

reference table only contained matches at the plant level, not the emission unit level. So

for New York EGUs accounted for in IPM, all emission units at a plant were assigned to

the MANE

- VU EGU file (including ancil lary emission units not accounted for in IPM).

After performing this initial splitting of the MANE

- VU point source inventory into EGU
and nonEGU components, we prepared several ad

- hoc QA/QC queries to verify that there

was no double

- counting of emissions in the EGU and nonEGU inventories:

• We reviewed the IPM parsed files { VISTASII_PC_1f_AllUnits_2009 (To
Client).xls and VISTASII_PC_1f_AllUnits_2018 (To Client).xls } to identify EGUs
accounted for in IPM. We compared this list of emission units to the nonE GU
inventory derived from the MANE

- VU cross

- reference table to verify that units

accounted for in IPM were not double

- counted in the nonEGU inventory . As a
result of this comparison, we made a few adjustments in the cross

- reference table to

add emission u nits for four plants to ensure these units accounted for in IPM were moved to the EGU inventory.

• We reviewed the nonEGU inventory to identify remaining emission units with an
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code of “4911 Electrical Services” or

So urce Classification Code of “1

- 01

- xxx

- xx External Combustion Boiler, Electric
Generation”. We compared the list of sources meeting these selection criteria to
the IPM parsed file to ensure that these units were not double

- counted.

• We compared the number of records for each NIF table in the original 2002 point

source file to the 2002 EGU and 2002 nonEGU files. We determined that the sum

of the number of records in the EGU file and the number of records in the nonEGU
file equaled the number of records in t he original 2002 point source file.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 3

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## • We compared the emissions by pollutant and state in the original 2002 point source

file to the 2002 EGU file and 2002 nonEGU files. We determined that the sum of

the emissions in the EGU file and the emissions in the no nEGU file equaled the

emissions in the original 2002 point source file.

As a result of this procedure, we created separate sets of NIF tables for 2002 for EGUs
(i.e., units accounted for in IPM) and nonEGUs. The nonEGU set of 2002 NIF tables were

used in all subsequent projections for 2009/2012/2018.

After release of Version 3 of the MANE

- VU 2002 inventory, New Jersey discovered that
fugitive emissions from petroleum refineries were missing from Version 3. New Jersey
supplied MACTEC with the emission unit identifiers for the fugitive releases, and the
appropriate records were added to the 2002 NIF files.. MACTEC used these revised
fugitive estimates for projecting emissions to 2009/2012/2018.

2.2 NONEGU POINT SOURCE GROWTH FACTORS

The nonEGU growth factors we re developed using three sets of data:

• The U.S. EPA’s E conomic Growth and Analysis System Version 5.0 (E GAS 5.0 )
using the d efault SCC c onfiguration . EGAS 5.0 generates growth factors from
REMI’s 53 Sector Policy Insight Model Version 5.5, the U.S. D epart ment of
Energy (DOE) Annual Energy Outlook 2004 (AEO2004) fuel use projections , and

national vehicle mile travel projections from EPA’s MOBILE 4.1 Fuel Combustion

Model;

• The DOE’s Annual Energy Outlook 2005 (AEO2005) fuel consumption forecasts

were used t o replace the AEO2004 forecasts that are used as the default values in

EGAS 5.0 ; and

• State

- supplied population, employment, and other emission projection data.

The priority for applying these growth factors was to first use the state

- supplied projection

da ta (if available). If no state

- supplied data are available, then we use d the AEO2005
projection factors for fuel consumption sources

. If data from these two sources were not
available, we use d the EGAS 5.0 default SCC configuration. Appendix A lists the
nonEGU point source growth factors used for this study.

2.2.1 EGAS 5.0 Growth Factors

EGAS is an EPA

- developed economic and activity forecast tool that provides credible
growth factors for developing emission inventory projections

. Growth factors areFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 4

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## generated using n ational

- and regional

- economic forecasts. For nonEGUs, the primary
economic activity data sets in EGAS 5.0 are :

• 

## State

- specific growth rates from the Regional Economic Model, Inc. (REMI)
Policy Insight® model, version 5.5. The REMI socioeconomic d ata (output by
industry sector, population, farm sector value added, and gasoline and oil
expenditures) are available by 4

- digit SIC code at the State level.

• 

## Energy consumption data from the DOE’s E nergy I nformation Administration’s
(EIA) Annual Energy Outlook 2004, with Projections through 2025 for use in
generating growth factors for non

- EGU fuel combustion sources. These data
include regional or national fuel

- use forecast data that were mapped to specific

SCCs for the non

- EGU fuel use sectors (e.g., commercial coal, industrial natural
gas). Growth factors are reported at the Census division level. These Census
divisions represent a group of States (e.g., the South Atlantic division includes

Delaware, the District of Columbia , and Maryland; the Middle Atlantic division
includes New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania; the New England division
includes Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and

Vermont ). Although one might expect different growth rates in each of these

States du e to unique demographic and socioeconomic trends, all States within each
division received the same growth rate.

EGAS uses these economic activity datasets and a set of cross

- reference files to generate
growth factors by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code, Source Classification
Code (SCC), or Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) codes. Growth
factors for 2009, 2012, and 2018 were calculated using 2002 as the base year at the State
and SCC level. County

- specific growth factors are not av ailable in EGAS 5.0.

There were several SCCs in the MANE

- VU 2002 inventory that are not included in the
EGAS 5.0 files. As a result, EGAS did not generate growth factors for those SCCs.
MACTEC assigned growth factors for the missing SCCs by assigning a s urrogate SCC that
best represented the missing SCC.

2.2.2 AEO2005 Growth Factors

The default version of EGAS 5.0 uses the DOE’s AEO2004 forecasts. We replaced these
data with the more recent AEO2005 forecasts to improve the emissions growth factors
produced. Using ACCESS, we created a copy of the “DOE EGAS 5” dataset. The dataset
includes three tables. One table contains the projection data values from 2001

- 2025. The

other two tables are the MACT and SCC crosswalk tables. The crosswalk tables are linkedFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 5

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## t o the projection table via a “model code”. Using the copy of AEO2004 data, we updated
the corresponding projection tables with data from the AEO2005 located at:

http://www.eia.doe.gov /oiaf/aeo/supplement/supref.html 

## . Using the data and descriptions from
the new tables, we matched the projection data to the appropriate model codes and then

built a table identical to the DOE EGAS 5 dataset with the new 2005 AEO data. The
resulting AC CESS dataset contains a projection data table with the exact same structure as
the original except with the new data. The SCC and MACT crosswalks did not require any
updates since the model code assignments were not changed in the new data table.

2.2.3 State Sp ecific Growth Factors

In addition to the growth data described above, we received growth projections from

several MANE

- VU states to be used instead of the default EGAS or AEO2005 growth
factors. The following paragraphs describe the growth factors used fo r each state.

2.2.3.1 

## Connecticut

C onnecticut provided state

- level employment

- based growth factors for various SIC
categories derived from CT Department of Labor (CTDOL) projections. For many
manufacturing sectors, employment is projected to decline, indicating the likelihood of
reduced activity levels and emissions for those sectors. Associated growth factors are less

than one. To ensure consistency within a facility, CTDEP indicated that the employment

based growth factors be used wherever possible, as match ed by SIC. MACTEC used the
growth factors by SIC code for all sources in CT, including those fuel combustion sources
that would otherwise have been projected using the AEO2005 forecasts.

2.2.3.2 

## Delaware

Delaware provided state

- level employment data from the Depa rtment of Labor by NAICS
codes for 2002 and 2012. We used these data to calculate the growth factor from 2002 to
2012 and interpolated these data to derive growth factors for 2009 and 2018 . We matched
these industry NAICS groupings to SCC codes in order to create SCC specific growth

factors for non

- EGU point sources.

2.2.3.3 

## District of Columbia

DC indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the enhancement
of using the DOE’s 2005 Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion sources.

2.2.3.4 

## Maine

Maine indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors and the DOE’s 2005
Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion sources.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 6

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

### 2.2.3.5 

## Maryland

Maryland provided growth factors by SCC for all counties in the State. These growth

factors were derived from a variety source sources, including the MWCOG Cooperative
Forecast 7.0, the BMC Round 6A Cooperative Forecast (prepared by the MD Dept. of
Planning, May 2004), and EGAS 5.0.

2.2.3.6 

## Massachusetts

Massachusetts also provided a link to employment projections for 2000

- 2010 for very
narrow occupational categories that are not directly correlated with SIC or SCC codes.
Since we could not match the occupational titles in the Massachusetts employment
projections with SIC or SCC codes, MACTEC use d the EGAS 5.0 gro wth factors (with the
AEO2005 enhancement for combustion sources) for projecting emissions from nonEGU

sources.

2.2.3.7 

## New Hampshire

New Hampshire indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the

enhancement of using the DOE’s 2005 Annua l Energy Outlook data for combustion

sources.

2.2.3.8 

## New Jersey

New Jersey indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the

enhancement of using the DOE’s 2005 Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion

sources.

2.2.3.9 

## New York

New York provid ed county

- level employment data for 12 counties in the New York City
metro area for 2002, 2009, 2012, and 2018. The employment projections are for broad
industry categories not directly correlated with SIC or SCC codes. Since we could not

match the 12

- co unty employment projections with SIC or SCC codes, MACTEC used the
EGAS 5.0 growth factors (with the AEO2005 enhancement for combustion sources) for
projecting emissions from nonEGU sources for both the 12

- county area and all other

counties in the state.

2.2.3.10 

## Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania provided total employment projections for a subset of counties. These
employment projections do not have enough detail regarding specific industrial groupings
to be correlated with SIC or SCC codes. MACTEC used the EGAS 5.0 gro wth factorsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 7

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## (with the AEO2005 enhancement for combustion sources) for projecting emissions from

nonEGU sources

2.2.3.11 

## Rhode Island

Rhode Island provided state

- level employment data from the Department of Labor and
Training by 3

- digit NAICS codes for 2002 and 2012 . We used these data to calculate the
growth factor from 2002 to 2012 and interpolated these data to derive growth factors for

2009 and 2018 . We matched these industry NAICS groupings to SCC codes in order to
create SCC specific growth factors for non

- EG U point sources.

2.2.3.12 

## Vermont

Vermont indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the

enhancement of using the DOE’s 2005 Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion

sources.

2.3 NONEGU POINT SOURCE CONTROL FACTORS

The following sections docu ment how the OTB/OTW c ontrol factor s were developed for

the MANE

- VU future year inventories. We developed control factors to estimate emission

reductions that will result from on

- the

- books regulations that will result in post

- 2002

emission reductions and proposed regulations or actions that will result in post

- 2002

emission reductions. Control factors were developed for the following national

, regional

,
or state control measures:

• NOx SIP Call Phase I (NOx Budget Trading Program)

• NOx SIP Call Phase II

• NOx RACT in 1

- hour Ozone SIPs

• NOx OTC 2001 Model Rule for ICI Boilers

• 2

- , 4

- , 7

- , and 10

- year MACT Standards

• Combustion Turbine and RICE MACT

• Industrial Boiler/Process Heater MACT

• Refinery Enforcement Initiative

• Source Shutdowns

In addition , states provide d specific control measure information about specific sources or
regulatory programs in their state. We used the state

- specific data to the extent it was

available.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 8

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 2.3.1 NOx SIP Call Phase I

Compliance with the NOx SIP Call in the Ozone Transport Commission (O TC) states was
scheduled for May 1, 2003. The requirements applied to all MANE

- VU states except Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. While the program applies primarily to electric
generating units (EGUs), the NOx SIP C all applies to non

- EGUs such as large industrial

boilers and turbines

. The NOx SIP Call did not mandate which sources must reduce
emissions; rather, it required states to meet an overall emission budget and gave them
flexibility to develop control strategies to meet that budget. All s tates in the MAN E

- V U
region affected by the NOx SIP C all chose to meet their NOx SIP Call requirements by
participating in the NOx Budget Trading Program. We reviewed the available state rules
and guidance documents to determine the affected nonEGU sources and ozone season NOx

allowances for each source

. Future year emissions for non

- EGU boilers/turbines were
capped at the allowance levels

. Since t he allowances are given in terms of tons per ozone
season (5 months May to September) , we calculate d annual emissi ons by multiplying the

ozone season allowances by a factor of 12 (annual) / 5 (ozone season)

. Table B

- 1

identifies those units included in the NOx SIP Call Phase I budget program

.

Cement kilns were also included in Phase I of the NO
x



## 2.3.2 NOx SIP Call Phase II SIP call. There is a cement kiln in
Maine, but it is not subject to the NOx SIP call. For the cement kilns in Maryland and
New York, a default control efficiency value of 25 percent was applied. For the cement
kilns in Pennsylvania, the state provided their best estimates o f the actual control
efficiency expected for each kiln after the NOx SIP Call. Table B

- 2 identifies the cement
kilns affected by the NOx SIP Call.

The final Phase II NO x SIP C all rule was promulgated on April 21, 2004. States had un til
April 21, 2005, to submit SIPs meeting the Phase II NOx budget requirements. The Phase

II rule applies to large IC engines, which are primarily used in pipeline transmission
service at compressor stations. We have identified affected units using the same methodology a s was used by EPA in the proposed Phase II rule (i.e., a large IC engine is
one that emitted, on average, more than 1 ton per day during 2002). The final rule reflects
a control level of 82 percent for natural gas

- fired IC engines and 90 percent for diesel or
dual fuel categories. Pennsylvania identified large IC engines affected by the rule. Table

B

- 3 identifies those units included in the NOx SIP Call Phase II.

2.3.3 NOx RACT in 1

- hour Ozone SIPs

Emission reductions requirements from NOx reasonably available control technology
(RACT) requirements in 1

- hour Ozone SIP areas were implemented in or prior to 2002

.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 9

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## These reductions should already be accounted for in the MANE

- VU 2002 inventory since
the 2002 inventory was based on 2002 actual em issions which includes any reductions due

to NOx RACT

.

2.3.4 NOx OTC 2001 Model Rule for ICI Boilers

The Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) developed control measures for industrial,
commercial, and institutional (ICI) boilers in 2001. Information about the pro posed OTC
NOx emission limits by fuel type and size range was obtained from Table I I I

- 1 of Control
Measure Development Support Analysis of Ozone Transport Commission Model Rules
( E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.

, March 31, 2001 )

. Information about the emiss ion limits
contained in the existing state rules (prior to adoption of the OTC 2001 model rule) were

obtained from Tables III

- 2 through III

- 9 of the Pechan document. Information about the
emission limits contained in the current state rules (as they exist ed in June 2006) were
obtained from the individual states regulations. The percent reduction for ICI boilers was
estimated by state, fuel type, and size range by comparing the current state emission limits
(as they existed in June 2006) with the state emi ssion limits as they existed in 2001.
Pennsylvania adopted the OTC 2001 model rule in five southeastern counties (Bucks,
Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia) for boilers in the 100 to 250 million
Btu/hour range. New Jersey adopted the OTC 200 1 model rule for natural gas

- fired boilers
with a maximum heat rate of at least 100 million Btu/hour. For other states, it did not
appear that the emission limits in 2006 had changed from the emission limits in 2001.

2.3.5 2

- , 4

- , 7

- , and 10

- year MACT Standards

Maximum achievable control technology (MACT) requirements were also applied , as documented in the report entitled Control Packet D evelopment and Data Sources, da ted
July 14, 2004 (available at http://www.epa.gov/air/interstateairquality/pdfs/Non

EGU_nonpoint_Control_Development.pdf 

## ). The point source MACTs and associated
emission reductions were designed from Federal Register (FR) notices and discus sions
with EPA’s Emission Standards Division (ESD) staff. These MACT requirements apply
only to units located at a major source of hazardous air pollutants (HAP)

. We did not apply reductions for MACT standards with an initial compliance date of 200 2 or e arlier,
assuming that the effects of these controls are already accounted for in the inventories
supplied by the States. Emission reductions w ere applied only for MACT standards with
an initial compliance date of 200 3 or greater.

Because the MANE

- VU inv entory does not identify HAP major sources, the reductions
from post

- 2002 MACT standards were applied on a more general scale to all sources with
certain SCCs. Every source with an SCC determined to be affected by a post

- 2002 MACTFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 10

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## standard was assigned an incremental percent reduction for the applicable MACT standard.

Table B

- 4 shows the SCCs affected and the incremental control efficiencies applied for

post

- 2002 MACT standards.

2.3.6 Combustion Turbine and RICE MACT

The MANE

- VU projection inventory does not in clude the NOx co

- benefit effects of the
MACT regulations for Gas Turbines or stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion
Engines, which EPA estimates to be small compared to the overall inventory.

2.3.7 Industrial Boiler/Process Heater MACT

EPA anticipates anci llary reductions in PM and SO2 as a result of the Industrial
Boiler/Process Heater MACT standard. The MACT applies to industrial, commercial, and

institutional units firing solid fuel (coal, wood, waste, biomass) which ha ve a design
capacity greater than 10 mmBtu/hr and are located at a major source of hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) . The boiler design capacity field in many cases was missing from the

MANE

- VU emission inventory. In lieu of boiler design capacity, we identified boilers
with the following S CCs that emitted greater than 10 tons/year of either SO2 or PM10

• 1

- 02

- 001

- xx Industrial, Anthracite Coal

• 1

- 02

- 002

- xx Industrial, Bituminous/subbituminous Coal

• 1

- 02

- 008

- xx Industrial, Petroleum Coke

• 1

- 02

- 009

- xx Industrial, Wood/Bark Waste

• 1

- 03

- 001

- xx C ommercial/Institutional, Anthracite Coal

• 1

- 03

- 002

- xx Commercial/Institutional, Bituminous/subbituminous Coal

• 1

- 03

- 009

- xx Commercial/Institutional, Wood/Bark Waste

• 3

- 90

- 002

- 89 In

- Process Fuel Use, Bituminous Coal

• 3

- 90

- 002

- 99 In

- Process Fuel Use, Bitumin ous Coal

• 3

- 90

- 008

- 89 In

- Process Fuel Use, Coke

• 3

- 90

- 008

- 99 In

- Process Fuel Use, Coke

• 3

- 90

- 009

- 99 In

- Process Fuel Use, Wood

For these sources, we applied the average MACT control efficiencies of 4% for SO2 and

40% for PM.

2.3.8 Refinery Enforcement Initiative

Both EPA and State/local agencies have negotiated (or are in the process of negotiating)

Consent Decrees t hat will require significant investment in pollution control technology
and will result in significant emission reductions in the future. There are eight refineries in

the MANE

- VU inventory impacted by the settlements. The five major refinery processes
that are affected by the judicial settlements are:Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 11

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## • Fluid Catalytic Cracking Units (FCCUs) and Fluid Coking Units (FCUs )

• Process Heaters and Boilers

• Fla re Gas Recovery

• Leak Detection and Repair

• Be n zene/Wastewater

As part of the development of the Assessment of Control Technology Options for

Petrol eu m Refineries in the Mid

- Atlantic Region (Draft Final, October 2006), MACTEC

coordinated with State and local agencies to develop estimates of future year emissions
based upon the settlements and recent permits that implement the provisions of those

settlements.

For FCCUs/FCUs, the Consent Decree control requirements generally require the
installation of wet gas scrubbers for SO2 control. Some of the units have already been
permitted to include the control requirements. In those cases, specific emission limits for
SO2 have already been established and were used as the best estimate of emission in 2009.

In cases where specific emission limitation have not yet been specified in permits, a 90
percent SO2 control efficiency was assumed as a conservative estimate of the SO2
reductions from the installation of a wet gas scrubber.

For NOx control at FCCUs/FCUs, the C onsent Decrees require selective catalytic
reduction (SCR), selective non

- catalytic reduction (SCNR), or optimization studies to
reduce NOx emissions. Some of the units have already been permitted to include the
control requirements. In those cases, spec ific emission limits for NOx have already been
established and were used as the best estimate of emission in 2009. In cases where specific
emission limitation have not yet been specified in permits, a 90 percent NOx control
efficiency was assumed for SCR, and a 60 percent reduction was assumed from the

installation of SNCR.

For SO2 emissions from boilers/heaters, the control requirements generally require the
elimination of burning solid/liquid fuels . We identified all boilers and heaters at the eight

aff ected refineries that burn solid or liquid fuels. For these units, we set the SO2 emissions
to zero in the future year inventories.

For NOx emissions from boilers/heaters, control requirements generally apply to units
greater than 40 million British th ermal units (MMBtu) per hour capacity or larger. In
many cases, the consent decrees establish NO x 

## emission reduction objectives across a

number of refineries that are owned by the same firm. Therefore, the companies have
some discretion in deciding which individual boilers/heaters to control as well as the
control techniques to apply. Also, the consent decrees have various phase

- in dates which
make it difficult to determine the exact date when the reductions will be fully realized. AsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 12

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## part of the develo pment of the Assessment of Control Technology Options for Petrol e um Refineries in the Mid

- Atlantic Region (Draft Final, October 2006), MACTEC coordinated
with State and local agencies to develop estimates of future year emissions based upon the

settlements and recent permits that implement the provisions of those settlements.

Heater/boiler NO x controls for the units to which they are applied were determined to be
equivalent to meeting a 0.04 lbs per million Btu NO x emission rate. Meeting this emission

red uction requirement is expected to provide an average NO x emission reduction of 50

percent from 2002 levels in 2009

.

The Consent Decrees also included enhanced LDAR programs (e.g., reducing the defined
leak concentration, increasing the monitoring frequency , other requirements. Our best
estimate is a 50% reduction in VOC emissions as a result of implementing enhanced
LDAR programs similar to those required in the recent Consent Decrees. This is based on
a study ( http://www.rti.org/pubs/ertc_enviro_2002_final1.pdf ) that estimated an enhanced
LDAR program could result in a 50% reduction in fugitive VOCs.

T he settlements are expected to produce additional SO2, NOx, and VOC emission

reducti ons for flare gas recovery and wastewater operations. T hese emission reductions
were not quantified as they are expected to produce less significant changes in the MANE

VU inventory because of the magnitude and uncertainty associated with the emissions

fr om these units in the 2002 MANE

- VU inventory

.

2.3.9 S ource Shutdowns

A few states indicated that significant source shutdowns have occurred since 2002 and that
emissions from these sources should not be included in the future year inventories. These

sources are identified in Table B

- 5

.

2.3.10 State Specific Control Factors

Delaware provided reductions expected from the Maritrans lightering operation. VOC

emissions are projected to be reduced by 34.8% by 2009, 69.3% by 2012, and 79.2% by

2018.

2.4 NONEGU POINT SOURCE QA /Q C REVIEW

Throughout the inventory development process, quality assurance steps were performed to
ensure that no double counting of emissions occurred, and to ensure that a full and
complete inventory was developed. Quality assurance was an important com ponent to the
inventory development process and MACTEC performed the following QA steps on the
nonEGU point source component of the MANE

- VU future year inventories:Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 13

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 1. State agencies reviewed the draft growth and control factors in the summer of
2005. Change s based on these comments were implemented in the files.

2. Compared, at the emission unit

- level, emissions from the IPM parsed files and

the MANE

- VU NIF files to verify that the splitting of the MANE

- VU point
source inventory into the EGU and nonEGU sectors did not result in any double
county of emissions or cause units to be missing from both inventories.

3. SCC level emission summaries were prepared and evaluated to ensure that
emissions were consistent and that there were no missing sources. Tier
comparisons (by pollutant) were developed between the revised 2002 base year
inventory and the 2009/2012/2018 projection inventories.

4. State level emission summaries were prepared and evaluated to ensure that

emissions were consistent and reasonable. The summaries inc luded base year
2002 emissions, 2009/2012/2018 projected emissions accounting only for
growth, 2009/2012/2018 projected emissions accounting for both growth and

emission reductions from OTB and OTW controls.

5. Emission inventory files in NIF format were prov ided for state agency review
and comment. Changes based on these comments were implemented.

6. All final files were run through EPA’s Format and Content checking software.

7. Version numbering was used for all inventory files developed. The version
numbering p rocess used a decimal system to track major and minor changes.
For example, a major change would result in a version going from 1.0 to 2.0 for
example. A minor change would cause a version number to go from 1.0 to 1.1.
Minor changes resulting from large ly editorial changes would result in a change
from 1.00 to 1.01 for example.

Final QA checks were run on the revised projection inventory data set to ensure that all
corrections provided by the S/L agencies and stakeholders were correctly incorporated into
the S/L inventories and that there were no remaining QA issues that could be addressed
during the duration of the project. After exporting the inventory to ASCII text files in NIF
3.0, the EPA QA program was run on the ASCII files and the QA output was r eviewed to
verify that all QA issues that could be addressed were resolvedFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 14

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 2.5 NONEGU POINT SOURCE NIF AND SMOKE FILES

The Version 3 file names and descriptions delivered to MARAMA are shown in Table 2

- 1.

2.6 NONEGU POINT SOURCE EMISSION SUMMARIES

Emission summ aries by state, year, and pollutant are presented in Tables 2

- 2 through 2

- 8
for CO, NH3, NOx, PM10

- PRI, PM25

- PRI, SO2, and VOC, respectively.

Table 2

- 1 NonEGU Point Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

File Name Date Description

MANEVU _OTB2009_Non EGU_ NIFV 3_1 .mdb Dec. 4, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 20 09 OTB
NonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU _OTB2012_NonEGU_ NIFV 3_1 .mdb Dec

. 4, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 201 2 OTB
NonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU _OTB2018_NonEGU_ NIFV 3_1 .mdb De c

. 4, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2018 OTB
Non EGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU _OTB2009_NonEGU_IDA V 3_1 .txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2009 OTB
NonEGU source inventory in
SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU _OTB2012_NonEGU_IDA V 3_1 .txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2012 OTB
NonEGU source inventory in
SMOKE IDA form at

MANEVU _OTB2018_NonEGU_IDA 3 V

_ 2 .txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2018 OTB
NonEGU source inventory in
SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU OTB BOTW NonEGU V 3_1 State Summary.xls Nov. 22, 2006 Spreadsheet with state totals by pollutant for all NonEGU

sources

MANEVU OTB BOTW NonEGU V 3_1 State SCC Summary.xls Dec

. 4, 2006 Spreadsheet with SCC totals by state and pollutant for all
NonEGU sources.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 15

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 2

- 2 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 2, 157 2,251 2,306 2,415

DE 8,812 9,037 8,748 8,651

DC 247 283 299 327

ME 9,043 10,147 10,467 11,433

MD 94,536 104,012 111,174 141,342

MA 10,793 12,027 12,552 13,426

NH 774 858 871 907

NJ 8,209 10,076 10,806 12,244

NY 53,259 61,411 65,541 78,876

PA 1 05,815 116,430 121,251 140,909

RI 1,712 1,764 1,821 1,927

VT 220 250 254 267

Total 295,577 328,546 346,090 412,724

0 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 16

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 2

- 3 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 0 0 0 0

DE 153 145 138 134

DC 4 5 5 5

ME 700 796 809 859

MD 305 347 366 410

MA 462 510 521 563

NH 37 46 50 60

NJ 0 0 0 0

NY 1,027 1,081 1,128 1,296

PA 1,170 1,307 1,363 1,591

RI 58 64 68 68

VT 0 0 0 0

Total 3,916 4,301 4,448 4,986

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 17

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 2

- 4 NonEGU P oint Sources OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 6,773 7,236 7,465 7,921

DE 4,372 4,076 4,135 4,246

DC 480 548 577 627

ME 12,108 14,285 14,661 15,753

MD 21,940 19,401 20,399 22,797

MA 18,292 20,603 21,372 23,040

NH 1,188 1,384 1,394 1,435

NJ 15,812 16,498 17,091 18,805

NY 34,253 33,648 34,586 37,133

PA 89,136 89,932 93,526 103,137

RI 2,308 2,449 2,471 2,442

VT 386 462 460 466

Total 207,048 210,522 218,137 237,802

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 18

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 2

- 5 NonEGU Point S ources OTB/OTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 990 1,035 1,058 1,106

DE 1,820 1,486 1,475 1,487

DC 157 178 186 198

ME 6,120 7,088 7,133 7,496

MD 4,739 4,797 5,040 5,828

MA 4,212 5,006 5,088 5,314

NH 918 1,084 1,097 1,129

NJ 3,439 4,205 4,417 4,959

NY 5,072 5,221 5,444 6,098

PA 23,282 25,169 26,307 29,516

RI 296 333 331 330

VT 235 267 272 296

Total 51,280 55,869 57,848 63,757

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 19

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 2

- 6 NonEGU Point Sources
OTB/OTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emissio n Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 822 871 894 939

DE 1,606 1,256 1,245 1,254

DC 128 145 152 164

ME 4,899 5,675 5,690 5,935

MD 2,772 2,861 3,011 3,503

MA 2,953 3,554 3,574 3,660

NH 857 1,008 1,021 1,052

NJ 2,947 3,588 3,7 64 4,234

NY 3,355 3,535 3,688 4,161

PA 12,360 13,578 14,159 15,878

RI 180 200 198 194

VT 198 226 229 246

Total 33,077 36,497 37,625 41,220

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 20

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 2

- 7 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 2,438 2,528 2,567 2,644

DE 35,706 7,117 7,401 7,610

DC 618 707 735 780

ME 14,412 18,656 18,492 18,794

MD 34,193 34,223 35,373 38,921

MA 14,766 18,185 18,442 18,955

NH 2,436 3,099 3,098 3,114

NJ 9,797 7,141 7,234 7,856

NY 58,227 62,922 64,484 67,545

PA 88,259 90,735 93,441 99,924

RI 2,651 3,163 3,182 3,164

VT 874 1,182 1,147 1,127

Total 264,377 249,658 255,596 270,434

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 2

– NonEGU Point Sources Page 2

- 21

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 2

- 8 NonEGU Point Sources OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 4,604 4,114 4,152 4,230

DE 4,645 2,987 2,311 1,993

DC 69 72 75 85

ME 4,477 4,740 4,985 5,709

MD 5,676 5,297 5,578 6,301

MA 7,794 8,381 9,061 10,564

NH 1,459 1,060 1,132 1,294

NJ 13,318 16,702 17,621 19,915

NY 9,933 10,157 10,750 12,354

P A 36,326 35,875 38,162 44,537

RI 1,898 1,640 1,695 1,812

VT 1,079 1,254 1,365 1,730

Total 91,278 92,279 96,887 110,524

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 1

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# 3.0 AREA SOURCES

The area source sector is comprised of stationary sources that are small and numerous, and

that have not been inve ntoried individually as specific point, mobile, or biogenic sources.
Individual sources are typically grouped with other like sources into area source categories
and the emissions are calculated on a county

- by

- county basis. Area source categories

include residential/commercial/industrial fuel combustion; small industrial processes;
solvent utilization (such as architectural coatings and consumer products); petroleum
product storage and transport (such as gasoline service stations); waste disposal; and

agr icultural activities.

The procedures for projecting emissions for area sources are described in this section. We

started with the MANE

- VU 2002 area source emission inventory. We first applied growth
factors to account for changes in population and econ omic activity. Next, we applied

control factors to account for future emission reductions from on

- the

- books (OTB) control
regulations and on

- the

- way (OTW) control regulations. The OTB control scenario
accounts for post

- 2002 emission reductions from promu lgated federal, State, local, and

site

- specific control programs as of June 15, 2005. The OTW control scenario accounts for
proposed (but not final) control programs that are reasonably anticipated to result in post

2002 emission reductions. We then cond ucted a series of quality assurance steps to ensure the development of complete, accurate, and consistent emission inventories. We provided

the inventories in three formats

– the National Emission Inventory Input Format (NIF),
SMOKE Inventory Data Analyze r (IDA) format, and SMOKE growth/control packets. We
also prepared emission summary tables by state and pollutant. Each of these activities is

discussed in this section.

3.1 INITIAL 2002 AREA SOURCE EMISSION INVENTORY

The starting point for the area source projections was Version 3 of the MANE

- VU 2002
area source emission inventory ( MANE

- VU _2002_ Area _040 6 06. MDB). There were two
updates to this version of the 2002 inventory in response to requests from the District of

Columbia and Massachusetts. These chan ges, described in the following paragraphs, were
used in preparing the 2009/2012/2018 projections.

After release of Version 3 of the MANE

- VU 2002 inventory, the District of Columbia
discovered a gross error in the 2002 residential, non

- residential and road way construction.
They requested that the following values be used for the 2002 base year and as the basis
for the 2009/2012/2018 projections:Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 2

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

### SCC Pollutant Code 2002 Annual Emissions (tpy)

2311010000 PM10

- PRI 8.2933

PM25

- PRI 1.6587

2311020000 PM10

- P RI 486.1951

PM25

- PRI 97.239

2311030000 PM10

- PRI 289.8579

PM25

- PRI 57.9716



## After release of Version 3 of the MANE

- VU 2002 inventory, Massachusetts revis ed their
inventory of area source heating oil emissions due to two changes: (1) SO2 emission

facto rs were adjusted for the sulfur content from 1.0 to 0.03 ; and (2) use of the latest DOE

EIA 2002 fuel use data instead of the previous version used 2001. These two changes
significantly altered the 2002 SO2 emissions for area source heating oil combustion

. Massachusetts provided revised 2002 PE and EM tables, which MACTEC used in
preparing the 2009/2012/2018 projection inventories.

3.2 AREA SOURCE GROWTH FACTORS

The area source growth factors were developed using three sets of data:

• The U.S. EPA’s E conomic Gr owth and Analysis System Version 5.0 (E GAS 5.0 )
using the d efault SCC c onfiguration . EGAS 5.0 generates growth factors from
REMI’s 53 Sector Policy Insight Model Version 5.5, the U.S. D epartment of
Energy (DOE) Annual Energy Outlook 2004 (AEO2004) fuel us e projections , and

national vehicle mile travel projections from EPA’s MOBILE 4.1 Fuel Combustion
Model;

• The DOE’s Annual Energy Outlook 2005 (AEO2005) fuel consumption forecasts
were used to replace the AEO2004 forecasts that are used as the default valu es in

EGAS 5.0 ; and

• State

- supplied population, employment, and other emission projection data.

The priority for applying these growth factors was to first use the state

- supplied projection
data (if available). If no state

- supplied data are available, then we use d the AEO2005
projection factors for fuel consumption sources

. If data from these two sources were not

available, we use d the EGAS 5.0 default SCC configuration. Appendix C lists the area
source growth factors used for this study.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 3

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 3.2.1 EGAS 5.0 Growth Factors

EGAS is an EPA

- developed economic and activity forecast tool that provides credible
growth factors for developing emission inventory projections

. Growth factors are
generated using n ational

- and regional

- economic forecasts. For nonEGUs, the prima ry economic activity data sets in EGAS 5.0 are :

• 

## State

- specific growth rates from the Regional Economic Model, Inc. (REMI)
Policy Insight® model, version 5.5. The REMI socioeconomic data (output by
industry sector, population, farm sector value added, and gasoline and oil
expenditures) are available by 4

- digit SIC code at the State level.

• 

## Energy consumption data from the DOE’s E nergy I nformation Administration’s
(EIA) Annual Energy Outlook 2004, with Projections through 2025 for use in
generating growth factors for non

- EGU fuel combustion sources. These data
include regional or national fuel

- use forecast data that were mapped to specific

SCCs for the non

- EGU fuel use sectors (e.g., commercial coal, industrial natural
gas). Growth factors are reported at the Census division level. These Census
divisions represent a group of States (e.g., the South Atlantic division includes
Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Maryland; the Middle Atlantic division
includes New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania; the N ew England division
includes Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and
Vermont). Although one might expect different growth rates in each of these
States due to unique demographic and socioeconomic trends, all States within each
division received the same growth rate.

EGAS uses these economic activity datasets and a set of cross

- reference files to generate
growth factors by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code, Source Classification
Code (SCC), or Maximum Achievable Contr ol Technology (MACT) codes. Growth
factors for 2009, 2012, and 2018 were calculated using 2002 as the base year at the State
and SCC level. County

- specific growth factors are not available in EGAS 5.0.

There were several SCCs in the MANE

- VU 2002 inventor y that are not included in the
EGAS 5.0 files. As a result, EGAS did not generate growth factors for those SCCs.
MACTEC assigned growth factors for the missing SCCs by assigning a surrogate SCC that
best represented the missing SCC.

3.2.2 AEO2005 Growth Fact ors

The default version of EGAS 5.0 uses the DOE’s AEO2004 forecasts. We replaced these
data with the more recent AEO2005 forecasts to improve the emissions growth factorsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 4

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## produced. Using ACCESS, we created a copy of the “DOE EGAS 5” dataset. The datase t includes three tables. One table contains the projection data values from 2001

- 2025. The

other two tables are the MACT and SCC crosswalk tables. The crosswalk tables are linked
to the projection table via a “model code”. Using the copy of AEO2004 dat a, we updated
the corresponding projection tables with data from the AEO2005 located at:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/supplement/supref.html 

## . Using the data and descriptions from
the new tables, we matched the projection data to the appropriate model codes and then

built a table identical to the DOE EGAS 5 dataset with the new 2005 AEO data. The
resulting ACCESS dataset contains a projection data table with the exact same structu re as the original except with the new data. The SCC and MACT crosswalks did not require any
updates since the model code assignments were not changed in the new data table.

3.2.3 State Specific Growth Factors

In addition to the growth data described above, we received growth projections from

several MANE

- VU states to be used instead of the default EGAS or AEO2005 growth
factors. The following paragraphs describe the area source growth factors used for each

state.

3.2.3.1 

## Connecticut

Connecticut provided state

- level population projections for 2009, 2012, and 2018. We
created growth factors for those SCCs that are population based using the state

- supplied
data. Connecticut also provided state

- level employment projections for industry categories
analogous to 2

- digit S IC codes. Projections were provided for 2009, 2012, and 2018. We
matched these industry groupings to SCC codes in order to create SCC specific growth

factors for area sources. Emissions from area source f uel combustion were projected using

the AEO2005 f orecasts.

3.2.3.2 

## Delaware

Delaware provided county

- level population projections ( Delaware Population Consortium Annual
Population Projections , Oct 18, 2001 Version 2001.0 ) for 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020. We
interpolated these data to get growth factors for projection from 2002 to 2009, 2012, and 2018 for
those SCCs that are population based. Delaware also provided state

- level employment data by
NAICS codes for 2002 and 2012. We interpolated values for 2009 and 2018. We matched these
industry groupings to SCC codes in order to create SCC specific growth factors for selected area

sources. 

## Emissions from area source fuel combustion were projected using the AEO2005

forecasts.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 5

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

### 3.2.3.3 

## District of Columbia

DC provided local growth factors for projecting emissions fro m 2002 to 2009, 2012, and
2018 for all area source SCCs except fuel combustion sources. Emissions from area
source fuel combustion were projected using the AEO2005 forecasts.

3.2.3.4 

## Maine

Maine indicated that it preferred to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors and t he DOE’s 2005
Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion sources.

3.2.3.5 

## Maryland

Maryland provided growth factors by SCC for all counties in the State. These growth
factors were derived from a variety source sources, including the MWCOG Cooperative

Forecast 7. 0, the BMC Round 6A Cooperative Forecast (prepared by the MD Dept. of
Planning, May 2004), and EGAS 5.0.

3.2.3.6 

## Massachusetts

Massachusetts provided county

- level population data for the years 2000, 2010, and 2020.
We interpolated these data to get growth facto rs for projection from 2002 to 2009, 2012,
and 2018 for those SCCs that are population based. Massachusetts also provided growth
factors for several SCCs based on employment data for the years 2000 and 2010. We
interpolated these data to get growth facto rs for projection from 2002 to 2009, 2012, and
2018. Massachusetts agreed on the use of the AEO2005 forecasts for projecting emissions

from area source fuel combustion.

3.2.3.7 

## New Hampshire

New Hampshire agreed to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the enhan cement of
using the DOE’s 2005 Annual Energy Outlook data for combustion sources.

3.2.3.8 

## New Jersey

New Jersey provided growth factors for most SCCs for all counties in the State. When

state

- specific growth factors were not available, we used the AEO2005 forec asts for
projecting emissions from area source fuel combustion and EGAS default factors for any
remaining categories.

3.2.3.9 

## New York

New York provided county

- level population data for 2002 and projections/growth factors for 2009,

2012, and 2018. We used these growth factors for those SCCs that are population based. W 

## e usedFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 6

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## the AEO2005 forecasts for projecting emissions from area source fuel combustion and
EGAS default factors for any remaining categories.

3.2.3.10 

## Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania provided county

- level popu lation data for 2000 and projections for 2010 and
2020. We interpolated these data to get growth factors for projectin g from 2002 to 2009,

2012, and 2018 for those SCCs that are population based. Pennsylvania also provided
general employment data for 21 counties or area for 2000 and projections for 2010 and
2020. We interpolated these data to get growth factors for projecting from 2002 to 2009,
2012, and 2018 for nine area source categories identified by Pennsylvania. For all other

area source categorie s , we used the AEO2005 forecasts for projecting emissions from area
source fuel combustion and EGAS default factors for any remaining categories.

3.2.3.11 

## Rhode Island

Rhode Island provided county

- level population projections for 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015,

and 2020. We interpolated these data to get growth factors for projection from 2002 to
2009, 2012, and 2018 for those SCCs that are population based. Rhode Island provided

state

- level employment data from the Department of Labor and Training by 3

- digit NAICS

code s for 2002 and 2012. We used these data to calculate the growth factor from 2002 to
2012 and interpolated these data to derive growth factors for 2009 and 2018 . We matched
these industry NAICS groupings to SCC codes in order to create SCC specific growth

factors for area sources. Rhode Island agreed on the use of the AEO2005 forecasts for
projecting emissions from area source fuel combustion.

3.2.3.12 

## Vermont

Vermont agreed to use the EGAS 5.0 growth factors, with the enhancement of using the

DOE’s 2005 Annual En ergy Outlook data for combustion sources.

3.3 AREA SOURCE CONTROL FACTORS

We developed control factors to estimate emission reductions that will result from on

- the

books regulations that will result in post

- 2002 emission reductions and proposed
regulations or actions that will result in post

- 2002 reductions. Control factors were
developed for the following national or regional control measures:

• OTC VOC Model Rules

• Federal On

- board Vapor Recovery

• New Jersey Post

- 2002 Area Source Controls

• Residential Woodstove NSPSFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 7

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 3.3.1 OTC 2001 VOC Model Rules

Most of the MANE

- VU States have adopted (or will soon adopt) the Ozone Transport
Commission (OTC) model rules for five area source VOC categories: consumer products,

architectural and industrial maintenance (AIM) coatings, p ortable fuel containers, mobile
equipment repair and refinishing (MERR) , and solvent cleaning. Information on the
percent reduction anticipated by each model rule w as obtained from Table II

- 6 of Control
Measure Development Support Analysis of Ozone Transp ort Commission Model Rules
( E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.

, March 31, 2001 )

. This set of model rules will be referred

to as the “OTC 2001 model rules” in this document. Information as to whether a particular
state has adopted (or will soon adopt) a parti cular measure was obtained form the Status
Report on OTC States’ Efforts to Promulgate Regulations Based on OTC Model Rules (As
of June 1, 2005, as posted on the OTC web site). For all categories

, except portable fuel

containers (see discussion below) , we assumed that the rules would be fully implemented
by all states by 2009

For consumer products, the 2001 OTC model rule was estimated to provide a 14.2 percent

VOC emissions reductions from the Federal Part 59 rule. Most, but not all, states in the

O TR have adopt ed the OTC 2001 model rule for consumer products

. For this inventory, it

was assumed that all OTC states would adopt the 2001 OTC model rule prior to 2009.
Thus, the 14.2 percent control factor was applied uniformly to all states in the 2009, 2012,
and 2018 projection inventories. . Some states had already adopted some the OTC 2001 Model Rules

in 2002 or already had similar rules in place in 2002. T he 2002 emission inventory for

those states already reflected the emission reductions expected from the OTC 2001 Model
Rule level of control. For those states and categories, no incremental reductions were
applied for to the future year projections, as indicated Table 3

- 1.

For AIM coatings, the 2001 OTC model rule was estimated to provide a 31 percen t VOC
emissions reduction from the Federal Part 59 rule. Most, but not all, states in the O TR

have adopt ed the OTC 2001 model rule for AIM coatings

. For this inventory, it was
assumed that all OTC states would adopt the 2001 OTC model rule prior to 2009. Thus,
this control factor was applied uniformly to all states, with one exception. Maine adopted

the OTC model rule with an alternative VOC content limit for varnishes and interior wood
clear and semitransparent wood stains. As a result, Maine estimate d that reductions from
AIM coatings should be modeled using a 29.5 percent control factor instead of the 31
percent estimated for the OTC 2001 model rule.

For portable fuel containers, the 2001 OTC model rule was estimated to provide a 75
percent reductio n in VOC emissions at the end of an assumed 10

- year phase

- in period asFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 8

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 3

- 1 Adoption Matrix for 2001 OTC Model Rules

State Consumer
Products AIM Coatings Portable Fuel
Containers Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing Solvent Cleaning

CT Yes Yes Y es Yes Yes

DE Yes Yes Yes Yes No

DC Yes Yes Yes Yes No

ME Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

MD Yes Yes Yes No No

MA Yes Yes Yes No * (7%)

NH Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

NJ Yes Yes Yes Yes ** (17%)

NY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

PA Yes Yes Yes No No

RI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

VT Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Yes

– apply incremental reductions in future years

No

– OTC Model Rule reductions already accounted for in 2002 inventory; no incremental reductions applied to future years. 

## * MA is amending i ts existing Solvent/Degreasing rule and anti cipates a 7% reduction from 2002 levels

. 

## ** NJ amended i ts existing Solvent/Degreasing rule and anticipates a 17% reduction from 2002 levels



## older non

- compliant containers are replaced with new compliant containers. The rule
penetration (RP) depends on t he assumed PFC estimated useful life and how quickly old

non

- compliant containers are replaced with new compliant containers. For the 2001 OTC

m odel r ule, the turnover from old to new containers is expected to be 10 percent per year.

The MANEVU states ha ve adopted the OTC 2001 model rule at different times, so the rule
penetration will vary by State depending upon when the rule became effective in a given
state. For example, compliant containers were required in Pennsylvania beginning on
January 1, 2003. By the 2009 ozone season, there will be a 6.5 year turnover period for
compliant PFCs in Pennsylvania. By contrast, compliant containers in New Jersey were
not required until January 1, 2005. Thus, by the 2009 ozone season, there will be a 4.5

year tur nover period for compliant PFCs. Table 3.2 shows the effective date for compliant
containers by state, along with the rule penetration factors and overall control efficiency.
There are different rule penetration factors for the three inventory years beca use of the
increased penetration of compliant containers into the marketplace. By 2018, 100 percent
compliance is assumed.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 9

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 3

- 2 Rule Penetration and Control Efficiency Values for
2001 OTC Model Rule for PFCs

Rule Compliance

Date States with thi s Compliance

Date Control Efficiency
(%) Rule

Penetration
(%) Overall Control Efficiency
(%)

Control Factor for 2009 Inventory

2003 MD, NY, PA 75 65 48.8

2004 CT, DE, DC, ME 75 55 41.3

2005 NJ 75 45 33.8

2006 NH 75 35 26.3

2007* MA, RI, VT 75 25 18.8

Control Factor for 20 12 In ventory

2003 MD, NY, PA 75 9 5 71.3

2004 CT, DE, DC, ME 75 8 5 63.8

2005 NJ 75 7 5 56.3

2006 NH 75 6 5 48.8

2007* MA, RI, VT 75 5 5 41.3

Control Factor for 20 18 Inventory

2003 MD, NY, PA 75 100 75.0

2004 CT, DE, DC, ME 75 100 75.0

2005 NJ 75 100 75.0

2006 NH 75 100 75.0

2007* MA, RI, VT 75 100 75.0



## * The 2001 OTC model rule is not yet effective . It was assumed to become effective January 1, 2007 for
the MANEVU modeling inventory. Massachusetts’ rule actually will not bec ome effective until 2009 and is
based only on the OTC 2006 model rule; Massachusetts will not adopt the OTC 2001 model rule.



## The emission reductions from the 2001 OTC PFC model rule were calculated only for the

emissions accounted for in the area source in ventory. Additional benefits (not estimated
for this report) would be expected from equipment refueling vapor displacement and
spillage that is accounted for in the nonroad inventory.

For mobile equipment repair and refin ishing , the 2001 OTC model rule wa s estimated to
provide a 38 percent VOC emissions reductions from the Federal Part 59 rule (35% for
paint application and 3% for cleaning operations)

. Most, but not all, states in the O TR

have adopt ed the OTC 2001 model rule for MERR or already had simila r rules in effect inFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 10

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 2002

. For this inventory, it was assumed that all OTC states would adopt the 2001 OTC
model rule prior to 2009 or have similar rules in effect. For those states (MD, MA, PA)
that had similar rules in effect in 2002 or earlier, no inc remental reductions were applied
since it was assumed that the effects of the state rule were already accounted for in the
2002 inventory. New Jersey indicated that a 19 percent control factor should be used for
VOC emissions from MERR in New Jersey. For all other states, the OTC 2001 Model

Rule control factor of 38 percent was applied.

For solvent cleaning, the 2001 OTC model rule was estimated to provide a 66 percent

VOC emissions reductions. Most, but not all, states in the O TR have adopt ed the OTC

20 01 model rule for solvent cleaning or already had similar rules in effect in 2002

. For
this inventory, it was assumed that all OTC states would adopt the 2001 OTC model rule
prior to 2009 or have similar rules in effect. For those states (DE, DC, MD, PA, VT) that
had similar rules in effect in 2002 or earlier, no incremental reductions were applied since
it was assumed that the effects of the state rule were already accounted for in the 2002
inventory. Massachusetts indicated that some portion of the red uctions resulting from the
OTC 2001 model rule were already accounted for in their 2002 emissions , but that the state
anticipated an additional 7 percent reduction from anticipated amendments. New Jersey
indicated that a 17 percent control factor should b e used for VOC emissions from solvent
cleaning in New Jersey. For all other states (CT, ME, NH, NY, RI), the OTC 2001 Model
Rule control factor of 66 percent was applied.

Table D

- 1 in Appendix D shows the anticipated percent reductions by state, SCC, and year from implementation of the OTC 2001 VOC Model Rules.

3.3.2 On

- Board Vapor Recovery

The U.S. EPA issued regulations requiring onboard vapor recovery (ORVR) standards for

the control of vehicle refueling emissions in 1994. ORVR works by routing refueling

v apors to a carbon canister on the vehicle and are expected to achieve from 95

- 98 percent
reduction in VOC emissions for those vehicles equipped with ORVR. ORVR is required

to be installed on some new light

- duty gasoline vehicles in 1998, and all new light

- and

medium

- duty automobiles and trucks will be required to have ORVR installed by 2006.

For the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, E.H. Pechan made estimates of emission
reductions as they grow over time due to increased rule penetration. The follow ing

discussion describes how the on

- board vapor recovery control factors were developed
(email from Maureen Mullen, E.H. Pechan):Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 11

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## “Onroad refueling control factors were calculated based on the percentage difference between the projection year (2007, 2008, 2009, 2012, and 2018) MOBILE6 refueling emission factors and the 2002 MOBILE6 refueling emission factors.

MOBILE6 emission factors were calculated at January and July temperature and fuel conditions. July emission factors were used as the surrogate for the five

- month ozone season (May through September) and the January emission factors were used as the surrogates for the remaining seven months. Temperatures modeled were the January and July average daily monthly maximum and minimum temperatures for ea ch State,
based on 30

- year average temperature data, as used in EPA’s second Section 812 Prospective analysis. Within a State, MOBILE6 input files were created for each unique combination of: January and July RVP, RFG, oxygenated fuel, and Stage II

contro l programs. Fuel data was based on 2002 data, also as used in the Section 812 analysis. Information on Stage II control programs and control efficiencies were provided by EPA, as included in the draft 2002 NEI. Using these same temperature inputs, fuel inputs, and Stage II control inputs (where applicable), Pechan calculated MOBILE6 emission factors for calendar years 2002, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2012, and
2018.

The resulting MOBILE6 emission factors were first weighted according to the default
MOBILE6 VMT mi x to determine the weighted average refueling emission factor for all gasoline vehicle types. The resulting January and July emission factors were weighted together according to the number of days in the seven

- month season (212 days) and the five

- month oz one season (153). After this was done for all of the modeled years and State or sub

- State areas, the overall control efficiency for refueling, due to fleet turnover, was calculated based on the percentage difference between the 2002 and corresponding proj ection year emission factors. These control efficiencies were then assigned to individual counties, based on the mapping of fuel and Stage II control parameters to those modeled in the MOBILE6 files.”

These projections were made on a county

- by

- county basi s

. Table D

- 2 shows the
anticipated percent reductions by county, SCC, and year.

3.3.3 Post

- 2002 Area Source Controls in New Jersey

New Jersey made gasoline transfer provision amendments at N.J.A.C. 7:27

- 16.3 . The
Stage I portion of the amendments are expected to result in emissions reductions of 23.2
percent from the 2002 baseline. This is based on a control efficiency of 29 percent and a
rule effectiveness of 80 percent. The State II portion of the amendments are already
incorporated into the inventory thro ugh the MOBILE6 inputs.

New Jersey also made amendments to ICI boiler provisions at N.J.A.C. The a mendments
require a ny ICI boiler has a maximum gross heat input rate of at least 5 mmBTU/hour,
whether or not it is located at a major NO x 

## facility, to condu ct annual tune

- ups. In the
support documentation for this rule amendment, New Jersey estimated that the tune

- ups would result in a 25 percent reduction in NOx emissions.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 12

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 3.3.4 Residential Wood Combustion

Control factors were evaluated to account for the replac ement of retired woodstoves that
emit at pre

- new source performance standard (NSPS) levels. We used EPA’s latest
methodology provided by Marc Houyoux of EPA/OAQPS. This methodology uses a combination growth and control factor and is based on activity not pollutant. The growth

and control are accounted for in a single factor the SCCs split out the controlled and

uncontrolled equipment . The control is indirectly incorporated based on which stove is
used. The combined growth and control rates are as follo ws:

• Fireplaces increase 1%/yr

• Old woodstoves (non

- EPA certified) decrease 2%/yr

• New woodstoves (EPA certified) increase 2%/yr

The data to support these rates were collected as part of the woodstove change

- out program development in OAQPS. Table D

- 3 show s the anticipated percent changes by SCC and

year.

3.4 AREA SOURCE QA/QC REVIEW

Throughout the inventory development process, quality assurance steps were performed to
ensure that no double counting of emissions occurred, to ensure that a full and complete

i nventory was developed for MANE

- VU, and to make sure that projection calculations
were working correctly. Quality assurance was an important component to the inventory
development process and MACTEC performed the following QA steps on the area source

comp onents of the 2009/2012/2018 projection inventories:

1. State agencies reviewed the draft growth and control factors in the summer of
2005. Changes based on these comments were implemented in the files.

2. SCC level emission summaries were prepared and evaluate d to ensure that
emissions were consistent and that there were no missing sources. Tier
comparisons (by pollutant) were developed between the revised 2002 base year
inventory and the 2009/2012/2018 projection inventories.

3. Emission inventory files in NIF fo rmat were provided for state agency review
and comment. Changes based on these comments were implemented.

4. All final files were run through EPA’s Format and Content checking software.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 13

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 3.5 AREA SOURCE NIF, SMOKE AND SUMMARY FILES

The Version 3 file names and descriptions delivered to MARAMA are shown in Table 3

- 3.

3.6 AREA SOURCE EMISSION SUMMARIES

Emission summaries by state, year, and pollutant are presented in Tables 3

- 4 through 3

- 10
for CO, NH3, NOx, PM10

- PRI, PM25

- PRI, SO2, and VOC, respectively.

Table 3

- 3 Area Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

File Name Date Description

MANEVU _OTB2009_ Area

_ NIFV3_ 2 .mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 20 09 OTB area

source NIF inventory

MANEVU _OTB2012_ Area

_ NIFV3_ 2 .mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 201 2 OTB area

so urce NIF inventory

MANEVU _OTB2018_ Area

_ NIFV3_ 2 .mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 2018 OTB area

source NIF inventory

MANEVU _OTB2009_ Area _IDA V3_ 2 .txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 2009 OTB area source inventory in SMOKE
IDA format

MANEVU _OTB2012_ Area _IDA V3_ 2 .txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 2012 OTB area source inventory in SMOKE
IDA format

MANEVU _OTB2018_ Area _IDA 3 V

_ 2 .txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 2018 OTB area source inventory in SMOKE
IDA format

MANEVU OTB BOTW Area V3_ 2 State Summary.xls Nov. 8, 2006 Spreadsheet with state totals by pollutant for all area sources

MANEVU OTB BOTW Area V3_ 2 State SCC Summary.xls Nov. 8, 2006 Spreadsheet with SCC totals by state and pollutant for all area

sources

.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 14

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 3

- 4 Area Sources
OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Pr ojections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 70,198 65,865 63,874 59,797

DE 14,052 15,395 15,233 14,864

DC 2,300 2,417 2,460 2,512

ME 109,223 102,743 99,877 94,181

MD 141,178 143,653 144,233 144,649

MA 137,496 132,797 130,255 125,205

NH 79,647 76,504 75,319 73,038

NJ 97,657 90,432 88,048 83,119

NY 356,254 336,576 327,118 307,659

PA 266,935 266,887 264,012 257,396

RI 8,007 8,007 8,026 8,024

VT 43,849 42,683 42,172 41,283

Total 1,326,796 1,283,959 1,260,627 1,211,727

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 15

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 3

- 5 Area Sources OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 5,318 5,208 5,156 5,061

DE 13,279 13,316 13,328 13,342

DC 14 16 16 17

ME 8,747 10,453 11,116 12,312

MD 25,834 31,879 34,222 38,155

MA 18,809 19,131 19,275 19,552

NH 2,158 2,466 2,584 2,789

NJ 17,572 19,457 20,154 21,435

NY 67,422 81,626 87,116 96,078

PA 79,911 98,281 105,418 117,400

RI 883 945 972 1,025

VT 9,848 12,156 13,062 14,580

Total 249,795 294,934 312,419 341,746

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 16

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 3

- 6 Area So urces OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 12,689 13,173 13,342 13,388

DE 2,608 2,821 2,913 3,014

DC 1,644 1,961 2,081 2,259

ME 7,360 7,477 7,486 7,424

MD 15,678 16,858 17,315 18,073

MA 34,281 35,732 36,331 37,187

NH 10,960 11,879 12,055 12,430

NJ 26,692 24,032 23,981 23,660

NY 98,803 106,375 107,673 108,444

PA 47,591 50,162 50,793 50,829

RI 3,886 4,149 4,260 4,397

VT 3,208 3,419 3,429 3,430

Total 265,400 278,038 281,659 284,535

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 17

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 3

- 7 Area Sources
OTB/OTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 48,281 48,970 49,004 49,479

DE 13,039 13,928 14,236 14,844

DC 3,269 3,511 3,605 3,825

ME 168,953 175,979 179,689 189,619

MD 95,060 105,944 110, 141 117,396

MA 192,860 198,668 200,692 204,922

NH 43,328 46,060 47,187 49,801

NJ 61,601 61,684 61,284 60,880

NY 369,595 382,124 385,925 392,027

PA 391,897 421,235 432,844 454,970

RI 8,295 8,962 9,244 9,797

VT 56,131 60,521 62,465 66,916

Total 1,452 ,309 1,527,586 1,556,316 1,614,476

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 18

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 3

- 8 Area Sources
OTB/OTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 14,247 13,766 13,517 13,033

DE 3,204 3,387 3,403 3,426

DC 805 860 879 917

ME 32,774 33,026 33, 189 33,820

MD 27,318 28,923 29,508 30,449

MA 42,083 43,121 43,186 43,438

NH 17,532 17,965 18,050 18,316

NJ 19,350 18,590 18,271 17,653

NY 87,154 87,576 87,260 86,422

PA 74,925 79,169 80,728 83,570

RI 2,064 2,184 2,232 2,316

VT 11,065 11,482 11,652 12,059

Total 332,521 340,049 341,875 345,419

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 19

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 3

- 9 Area Sources OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 12,418 12,581 12,604 12,184

DE 1,588 1,599 1,602 1,545

DC 1,337 1,487 1,541 1,632

ME 13, 149 13,776 13,846 13,901

MD 12,393 13,685 14,074 14,741

MA 25,488 25,961 26,029 25,570

NH 7,072 7,463 7,470 7,421

NJ 10,744 10,672 10,697 10,510

NY 130,409 139,589 140,154 141,408

PA 63,679 67,535 67,446 66,363

RI 4,557 5,024 5,189 5,398

VT 4,087 4 ,646 4,687 4,764

Total 286,921 304,018 305,339 305,437

0 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 3

– Area Sources Page 3

- 20

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 3

- 10 Area Sources OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 87,302 75,693 73,560 71,274

DE 15,519 14,245 13,943 13,744

DC 6,432 5,420 5,35 2 5,255

ME 100,621 91,910 91,667 92,410

MD 120,254 110,385 108,067 110,046

MA 162,145 148,625 145,674 140,558

NH 65,370 63,069 63,356 64,368

NJ 167,882 147,617 143,752 139,626

NY 507,292 462,811 456,856 457,421

PA 240,785 228,444 230,393 243,421

RI 31,402 26,695 25,548 23,561

VT 23,265 24,068 24,635 26,198

Total 1,528,269 1,398,982 1,382,803 1,387,882

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 550,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2012 OTB/W

2018 OTB/WFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 1

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# 4.0 NONROAD SOURCES

The nonroad source sector is comprised o f nonroad engines included in EPA’s
NONROAD model, as well as other nonroad engines n ot accounted for in the NONROAD

model , including aircraft, commercial marine vessels, and locomotive engines. The
sections that follow describe the projection process used to develop 2009/2012/2018
nonroad projection estimates for sources found in the NON ROAD model and those
sources estimated outside of the model (locomotives, airplanes and commercial marine
vessels).

4.1 NONROAD MODEL SOURCES

NONROAD model source categories include equipment such as recreational boats and

watercraft; recreational vehicles; fa rm, industrial, mining, and construction machinery ; and
lawn and garden equipment. Also included are a ircraft ground support equipment and rail
maintenance equipment . These equipment types are powered by engines using diesel,
gasoline, compressed natural gas (CNG), and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).

EPA released a revised version of NONROAD during December 2005 called NONROAD
2005. EPA’s National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) is a consolidated modeling
system that incorporates the NONROAD and MOBILE mo dels, along with a county
database of inputs. EPA also released an updated version of NMIM called NMIM2005,
which incorporates the NONROAD2005 model.

MACTEC utilized the NMIM2005 model to develop projections for nonroad engines

included in the NONROAD20 05 model. Projected emission estimates were calculated
using NMIM default data. Prior to starting the NMIM2005 runs, MACTEC confirmed
with U.S. EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) that the database used
for fuel sulfur content, gas Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) values and reformulated fuel
programs was current and up to date for the MANE

- VU region. The information received
from OTAQ indicated that these values were the most current.

NMIM2005 runs were then developed for each projection year . These included 2009,
2012 and 2018. Emission calculations were made at the monthly level and consolidated to
provide annual values. This enabled monthly temperatures and changes in reformulated
gas to be captured by the program.

The NMIM/NONROAD2005 results in NIF 3.0, and ran EPA’s QA checker program to
verify that the NIF 3.0 files were properly constructed.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 2

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 4.2 AIRCRAFT, COMMERCIAL MARINE, AND LOCOMOTIVES

Since aircraft, commercial marine vessels, and locomotives are not included in the

NONROAD model, emission projections for these sources were developed separately.
The starting point for the emission projections was Version 3 of the MANE

- VU 2002
Nonroad emission inventory ( Documentation of the MANE

- VU 2002 Nonroad Sector
Emission Inventory, Version 3, Draft Technical Memorandum , March 2006).

MACTEC’s approach to developing emission projections for these sources was to use
combined growth and control factors developed from emission projections for U.S. EPA’s
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) developmen t effort. MACTEC obtained emission
projections developed for the CAIR rule. We then calculated the combined growth and
control factors by determining the ratio of emissions between 2002 and each of the

MANE

- VU projection years (2009, 2012, and 2018). Th e CAIR emissions were available
for 2001, 2010, 2015 and 2020. Thus, we developed intermediate year estimates using
linear interpolation between the actual CAIR years and the MANE

- VU years.

Using this approach we developed State/county/SCC/pollutant gro wth/control factors for
use in projecting the MANE

- VU base year data to the year of interest. These values were
then used to multiply times the base year value to obtain the projected values. Since the
development of the CAIR factors included both growth and controls, no separate control
factors were developed for these sources except where exceptions to this method were used
for States that requested alternative growth/control methods (see below).

Once the CAIR factors were developed, MACTEC compared the SCCs contained in the
CAIR inventory with those used in MANE

- VU. In some cases there were differences. In
cases where a similar SCC in the CAIR inventory could be assigned to the SCC in the

MANE

- VU inventory the State/County/SCC/pollutant growth and con trol factor for the
substitute was assigned to the MANE

- VU SCC. If no corresponding county SCC

substitution could be found, a State or MANE

- VU regional average value for the substitute
SCC was developed and assigned for use in projecting emissions. The s ubstitution scheme

was to use State values first, then MANE

- VU regional values if the State value couldn’t be

used.

This projection method was used with three exceptions. These exceptions were: 1)
Maryland sources, 2) DC locomotive growth and controls an d 3) Logan (Boston) airport.
Each of these sources used alternative growth and/or controls provided by the States or
developed from current Federal rules for these sources (applies to controls only). Each of

these is discussed below.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 3

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 4.2.1 Maryland Non

- NONROAD Source Emissions

Maryland indicated that they would prefer to use EGAS growth factors coupled with
Federal controls to determine projected emissions for these source categories. Maryland
provided EGAS growth factors for use with these categories. Contro l values were
developed based on Federal rules that were on the books.

For CMV, controls were developed based on data contained in Table 1.1

- 2 of the
document “Final Regulatory Support Document: Control of Emissions from New Marine
Compression

- Ignition Eng ines at or Above 30 Liters per Cylinder,” EPA420

- R

- 03

- 004,
January 2003. Values in that table were interpolated to develop emission estimates with

and without controls for the MANE

- VU years (and base year) and then control factors

were calculated for thos e values. Only Category 3 marine engines were identified in the
Maryland inventory and thus only NOx controls for those engines were developed.

For locomotives, control factors for different types of locomotives were developed using

Tables 6

- 2 through 6

- 5 of the document “Locomotive Emission Standards: Regulatory
Support Document,” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile
Sources, April 1998. Since these tables only showed PM controls, we assumed the same

level of control for both PM

- 10 and PM

- 2.5. Controls for VOC, NOx and PM were
developed using these tables.

In addition to engine specification controls for both CMV and locomotives, we also
developed control factors resulting from changes to diesel fuel sulfur contents. The die sel
fuel sulfur regulations were utilized to develop controls for SO2 and PM due solely to
changing fuel sulfur requirements. Data from Tables 3.1

- 6a and 3.4

- 8a of the document
“Final Regulatory Analysis: Control of Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Engines,”

EPA420

- R

- 04

- 007, May 2004 were used to develop control levels created due to changes
in fuel sulfur content. In cases where there were controls due to both engine technology
and fuel sulfur reduction, we added the control efficiencies together to create a combined
control efficiency. All control values are considered to be “additive”. In other words, the
controls applied are above those found in the base year. Thus the controls were used on
the base year emission values without back

- calculation to dete rmine uncontrolled levels

since the controls are in addition to those controls.

The control values were then applied along with the growth factors to the base year
emissions for Maryland to produce the required emission projections.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 4

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 4.2.2 DC Locomotive Emissions

The District of Columbia emission contact provided MACTEC with alternative growth
factors for locomotive emissions. The growth factors provided were:

2002

- 2009 6.9%
2002

- 2012 9.9%
2002

- 2018 13.7%

Since the CAIR factors were combined growth and controls, the control factors developed
for locomotives for Maryland (based on Federal control programs) were used to apply
controls to the DC locomotive emissions. As was the case for Maryland, the control
factors were “additive” and were used on the base year emission without back

- calculating
uncontrolled emissions since the control levels were relative to controls in place for 2002.

4.2.3 Logan (Boston) Airport Emissions

Massachusetts supplied historic and future year projections of operations at Logan Airport.
The data covered the period 2000

- 201 0. Since only one year of the period required for

MANE

- VU projections was included in that interval (2009), MACTEC developed
estimates for 2012 and 2018 from those data by linear interpolation. Two linear
interpolations were developed. The first used th e entire data set (2000

- 2010) to develop a
linear projection for 2012 and 2018 and a second using just the 2002

- 2010 data. For the
final growth factors, MACTEC used the average of the two. These growth factors were
then applied to commercial aircraft ope rations for Suffolk County (FIPS = 25025). The
growth factors developed were:

2002

- 2009 1.184
2002

- 2012 1.22
2002

- 2018 1.33

No controls that would come on board for aircraft for the projection years were identified
from a review of Federal programs.

4.3 NONROAD QA/QC REVIEW

Throughout the inventory development process, quality assurance steps were performed to
ensure that no double counting of emissions occurred, to ensure that a full and complete
inventory was developed for MANE

- VU, and to make sure that projection calculations

were worki ng correctly. MACTEC performed the following QA steps on nonroad source
projection inventories: (1) All final files (NONROAD only) were run through EPA’s
Format and Content checking software; SCC level emission summaries were prepared and

evaluated to ens ure that emissions were consistent with the 2002 projections and that there
were no missing source categories or geographical areas.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 5

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 4.4 NON ROAD NIF , SMOKE, AND S UMMARY FILES

The Version 3 .1 file s delivered to MARAMA are shown in Table 4

- 1.

4.5 NONROAD EMISSION SU MMARIES

Table 4

- 2 a shows the CO emissions by state and year for the entire nonroad sector. Table

4

- 2 b presents the CO emission results for NONROAD model equipment only. Table 4

- 2 c presents the CO emission results for only the aircraft, commercial marine vessel, and
locomotive categories. Tables 4

- 3 to 4

- 8 present the emission results for the other criteria
pollutants of interest.

Table 4

- 1 Nonroad Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

File Name Date Description

MANEVU _OTB2009_ NR

_ NIFV3_ 1 .mdb Oct. 2 3 , 2006 Version 3. 1 of 20 09 nonroad

source NIF inventory

MANEVU _OTB2012_ NR

_ NIFV3_ 1 .mdb Oct. 23 , 2006 Version 3. 1 of 201 2 nonroad

source NIF inventory

MANEVU _OTB2018_ NR

_ NIFV3_ 1 .mdb Oct. 23 , 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2018 nonroad

source NIF inventory

MANEVU _OTB 2009_ NR _IDA V3_ 1 .txt Oct. 26 , 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2009 nonroad source inventory in SMOKE
IDA format

MANEVU _OTB2012_ NR _IDA V3_ 1 .txt Oct. 26 , 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2012 nonroad source inventory in SMOKE
IDA format

MANEVU _OTB2018_ NR _IDA 3 V

_ 1 .txt Oct. 26 , 2006 Ve rsion 3. 1 of 2018 nonroad source inventory in SMOKE
IDA format

MANEVU OTB Nonroad V3_1 State Summary.xls Oct. 23, 2006 Spreadsheet with state totals by pollutant for all nonroad sources, NONROAD model sources, and aircraft, locomotives, and commercial

mar ine vessels

MANEVU OTB Nonroad V3_1 State SCC Summary.xls Oct. 23, 2006 Spreadsheet with SCC totals by state and pollutant for all nonroad sources, NONROAD
model sourcesFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 6

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 2 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections (tons per y ear)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 276,773 282,788 288,061 303,764

DE 68,782 74,856 76,491 80,646

DC 18,845 20,746 21,306 22,429

ME 153,424 163,782 165,273 166,679

MD 437,400 497,276 513,737 550,795

MA 461,514 504,400 516,019 546,373

NH 130,782 142 ,318 143,804 147,544

NJ 704,396 753,916 777,069 831,880

NY 1,233,968 1,349,439 1,388,406 1,474,727

PA 931,978 1,031,816 1,058,256 1,119,247

RI 73,013 80,228 82,113 87,195

VT 62,248 68,360 69,003 70,074

Total 4,553,124 4,969,925 5,099,538 5,401,353

0 250,000 500,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,500,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 7

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 2 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 274,388 280,253 285,415 300,931

DE 65,954 71,877 73,397 77,356

DC 18,775 20,671 21,229 22,350

ME 148,555 158,715 160,043 161,21 5

MD 424,777 482,312 497,806 532,970

MA 448,399 490,895 501,684 530,686

NH 128,572 139,288 140,655 144,191

NJ 692,548 741,792 764,424 818,519

NY 1,219,309 1,333,923 1,372,164 1,457,277

PA 903,168 1,003,480 1,029,045 1,088,614

RI 71,573 78,764 80,607 85,618

VT 61,732 67,802 68,421 69,456

Total 4,457,748 4,869,771 4,994,890 5,289,186

0 250,000 500,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,500,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 8

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 2 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources OTB/OTW Annual CO Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 2,385 2,535 2,646 2,833

DE 2,828 2,979 3,094 3,290

DC 70 75 77 79

ME 4,868 5,067 5,230 5,464

MD 12,624 14,964 15,931 17,825

MA 13,116 13,505 14,335 15,687

NH 2,211 3,030 3,149 3,353

NJ 11,849 12,124 12,645 13,361

NY 14,660 15,516 16,242 17,450

PA 28,810 28,3 36 29,211 30,633

RI 1,440 1,464 1,506 1,577

VT 516 558 582 618

Total 95,375 100,154 104,648 112,167

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 9

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 3 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 17 18 19 21

DE 5 6 6 7

D C 2 3 3 3

ME 11 13 14 15

MD 28 31 33 36

MA 28 31 33 36

NH 9 10 11 12

NJ 43 45 4 7 5 2

NY 79 89 94 103

PA 55 62 66 73

RI 4 4 5 5

VT 5 5 6 6

Total 287 317 33 7 3 69

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 10

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 3 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 17 18 19 21

DE 5 6 6 6

DC 2 3 3 3

ME 11 13 14 15

MD 28 31 33 36

MA 28 31 33 36

NH 9 10 11 12

NJ 43 45 47 52

NY 79 89 94 103

PA 55 62 66 73

RI 4 4 5 5

VT 5 5 6 6

Total 287 318 335 369

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 11

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 3 c Ai rcraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources OTB/OTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 0 0 0 0

DE 0 0 0 0

DC 0 0 0 0

ME 0 0 0 0

MD 0 0 0 0

MA 0 0 0 0

NH 0 0 0 0

NJ 0 0 0 0

NY 0 0 0 0

PA 0 0 0 0

RI 0 0 0 0

VT 0 0 0 0

Total <1 <1 < 1 <1

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 12

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 4 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 25,460 21,512 19,316 16,233

DE 16,227 15,439 15,081 14,631

DC 3,571 2,981 2,620 1,815

ME 9,820 8,500 7,752 6,543

MD 37,472 31,762 29,058 24,257

MA 42,769 35,703 32,118 27,040

NH 9,912 8,485 7,624 6,344

NJ 63,479 52,703 48,234 41,166

NY 109,878 94,186 85,852 72,400

PA 103,824 76,105 67,818 55,771

RI 5,002 4,022 3,470 2,723

VT 4,217 3,452 2,992 2,262

Total 431,631 354,850 321,935 271,185

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 13

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 4 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 17,897 14,849 12,811 9,784

DE 5,798 4,755 4,108 2,966

DC 3,066 2,561 2,221 1,444

ME 8,229 6,957 6,211 4,970

MD 27,789 23,431 20,839 15,745

MA 30,047 24,606 21,274 16,096

NH 8,150 6,749 5,893 4,583

NJ 43,515 34,447 30,416 23,594

NY 78,648 66,645 58,900 45,400

PA 62,265 49,982 42,571 30,797

RI 4,564 3,624 3,066 2,294

VT 4,170 3,403 2,941 2,205

Total 294,138 242,009 211,252 159,877

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 14

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 4 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources OTB/OTW Annual NOx Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 7,563 6,663 6,505 6,449

DE 10 ,428 10,684 10,973 11,665

DC 505 420 399 371

ME 1,592 1,543 1,541 1,573

MD 9,683 8,331 8,219 8,512

MA 12,722 11,097 10,844 10,944

NH 1,763 1,736 1,731 1,761

NJ 19,964 18,256 17,818 17,572

NY 31,230 27,541 26,952 27,000

PA 41,559 26,123 25,247 24,97 4

RI 438 398 404 429

VT 47 49 51 57

Total 137,493 112,841 110,683 111,308

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 15

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 5 a All Nonroad Sources
OTB/OTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 1,952 1,642 1,532 1,236

DE 1,021 947 940 897

D C 310 235 209 135

ME 1,437 1,367 1,301 1,086

MD 4,936 4,353 4,191 3,814

MA 3,531 2,964 2,768 2,246

NH 1,058 944 881 698

NJ 5,495 4,539 4,233 3,489

NY 9,605 8,050 7,425 5,830

PA 9,738 8,501 8,112 6,949

RI 500 435 414 348

VT 530 476 439 331

Total 4 0,114 34,453 32,445 27,059

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 16

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 5 b NONROAD Model Sources
OTB/OTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 1,713 1,407 1,295 987

DE 570 456 414 301

DC 298 226 200 127

ME 1,204 1,119 1,039 797

MD 3,1 19 2,534 2,321 1,782

MA 2,887 2,370 2,176 1,640

NH 947 834 769 581

NJ 4,285 3,424 3,143 2,411

NY 8,339 6,871 6,248 4,624

PA 6,282 5,282 4,839 3,574

RI 403 337 314 244

VT 518 462 425 316

Total 30,565 25,321 23,182 17,385

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 17

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 5 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources
OTB/OTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 239 235 237 249

DE 451 491 526 596

DC 12 9 9 8

ME 233 248 262 289

MD 1,817 1,819 1,870 2,032

MA 644 594 592 606

NH 111 110 112 117

NJ 1,210 1,115 1,090 1,078

NY 1,266 1,179 1,177 1,206

PA 3,456 3,219 3,273 3,375

RI 97 98 100 104

VT 12 14 14 15

Total 9,549 9,132 9,263 9,674

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 18

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 6 a All Nonroad Sources
OTB/OTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 1,794 1,508 1,408 1,135

DE 926 856 849 808

DC 299 216 192 124

ME 1,329 1,238 1,177 978

MD 4,357 3,806 3,653 3,301

MA 3,226 2,710 2,531 2,052

NH 965 861 802 634

NJ 4,997 4,113 3,829 3,143

NY 8,821 7,390 6,81 5 5,349

PA 8,440 7,274 6,900 5,808

RI 443 383 364 303

VT 486 436 402 303

Total 36,084 30,791 28,922 23,938

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 19

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 6 b NONROAD Model Sources
OTB/OTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 1,578 1,296 1,193 911

DE 525 420 381 277

DC 288 208 184 117

ME 1,135 1,030 956 734

MD 2,870 2,333 2,137 1,641

MA 2,659 2,184 2,005 1,512

NH 872 768 708 536

NJ 3,951 3,154 2,896 2,223

NY 7,677 6,327 5,755 4,262

PA 5,784 4,866 4,459 3,296

RI 371 311 290 226

V T 477 426 391 292

Total 28,186 23,321 21,356 16,027

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 20

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 6 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources
OTB/OTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 216 212 215 224

DE 401 436 468 531

DC 11 8 8 7

ME 194 208 221 244

MD 1,487 1,473 1,516 1,660

MA 568 526 526 540

NH 94 93 94 98

NJ 1,047 959 933 920

NY 1,144 1,063 1,060 1,087

PA 2,656 2,408 2,441 2,512

RI 72 72 74 77

VT 9 10 11 11

Total 7,898 7,470 7,566 7,911

0 1,000 2,000 3,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 21

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 7 a All No nroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 2,087 887 711 815

DE 3,983 2,851 2,834 3,296

DC 375 66 9 5

ME 917 201 82 82

MD 7,942 1,638 706 577

MA 3,791 983 470 442

NH 891 310 218 246

NJ 15,6 86 3,508 1,253 832

NY 12,920 3,387 1,724 1,686

PA 7,915 1,659 667 607

RI 377 93 42 42

VT 372 68 15 13

Total 57,257 15,651 8,731 8,643

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 22

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 7 b NONROAD Model Sources OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 20 12 2018

CT 1,377 249 39 28

DE 513 90 12 8

DC 341 59 6 3

ME 772 132 24 19

MD 2,569 452 63 42

MA 2,428 429 66 47

NH 673 119 20 16

NJ 3,525 607 93 67

NY 6,966 1,208 182 130

PA 5,292 917 135 92

RI 336 60 10 7

VT 368 64 10 8

Total 25,159 4,387 661 467

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 23

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 7 c Aircraft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources OTB/OTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 711 638 672 787

DE 3,470 2,761 2,822 3,288

DC 34 7 3 2

ME 145 69 58 63

MD 5,372 1,186 643 535

MA 1,363 554 404 395

NH 218 191 198 230

NJ 12,161 2,901 1,160 765

NY 5,953 2,179 1,542 1,556

PA 2,623 742 532 515

RI 42 33 32 35

VT 5 4 5 5

Total 32,097 11,264 8,070 8,176

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 24

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 8 a All Nonroad Sources OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projec tions (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 33,880 24,910 22,657 20,694

DE 8,010 6,440 6,044 5,653

DC 2,073 1,559 1,438 1,369

ME 31,144 29,445 27,093 21,988

MD 56,330 43,260 40,266 37,969

MA 56,749 43,429 39,713 36,306

NH 22,377 19,651 17, 933 15,003

NJ 83,919 62,920 57,769 53,625

NY 157,612 128,421 117,770 104,562

PA 102,331 84,744 78,630 69,956

RI 7,780 6,038 5,640 5,389

VT 10,548 10,105 9,304 7,566

Total 572,751 460,922 424,257 380,080

0 30,000 60,000 90,000 120,000 150,000 180,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 25

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 8 b NONROAD Model Sources
OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 33,519 24,546 22,286 20,308

DE 7,531 5,943 5,533 5,115

DC 2,053 1,540 1,419 1,351

ME 30,741 29,030 26,669 21,547

MD 53,035 39,731 36,638 34,106

MA 54,836 41,473 37,706 3 4,185

NH 22,238 19,476 17,752 14,810

NJ 81,900 60,878 55,682 51,451

NY 155,475 126,265 115,553 102,224

PA 99,241 82,094 75,941 67,186

RI 7,699 5,956 5,556 5,302

VT 10,520 10,076 9,273 7,533

Total 558,788 447,006 410,009 365,117

0 30,000 60,000 90,000 120,000 150,000 180,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007
Section 4

– Nonroad Sources Page 4

- 26

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## T able 4

- 8 c Airc raft, Locomotive, and Commercial Marine Sources
OTB/OTW Annual VOC Emission Projections (tons per year)

State 2002 2009 2012 2018

CT 361 364 371 386

DE 480 497 511 538

DC 20 19 19 18

ME 403 415 424 441

MD 3,295 3,529 3,628 3,863

MA 1,913 1,956 2,0 07 2,121

NH 139 175 181 193

NJ 2,019 2,042 2,087 2,174

NY 2,137 2,156 2,217 2,338

PA 3,090 2,650 2,689 2,770

RI 81 82 84 87

VT 27 29 31 33

Total 13,964 13,916 14,248 14,963

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000



### CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009

2012

2018Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 1

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# 5.0 BEYOND

- ON

- THE

- WAY EMISSION INVENTORY

The States are considering addit ional control measures as part of their planning to achieve
regional haze goals and to attain the ozone and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). To accomplish this, m any of the states will need to implement

additional measures to reduce e missions. As such, the Ozone Transport Commission
(OTC) undertook an exercise to identify a suite of additional control measures that could
be used by the states in the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) in attaining their ai r quality
goals

.

Based on the anal yses conducted by various OTC Workgroups, the OTC Commissioners
made several recommendations at the Commissioner’s meeting in Boston on June 7, 2006 :

• Memorandum of Understanding Among the States of the Ozone Transport Commission on a Regional Strategy Co ncerning the Integrated Control of Ozone Precursors from Various Sources

• Resolution 06

- 02 of the Ozone Transport Commission Concerning Coordination and Implementation of Regional Ozone Control Strategies for Certain Source Categories

• Statement of the Ozone Transport Commission Concerning Multi

- Pollutant Emission Control of Electric Generating Units

• Resolution 06

- 03 of the Ozone Transport Commission Concerning Federal Guidance and Rulemaking for Nationally

- Relevant Ozone Control Measures

The Commissioners re commended that States consider emission reductions from the
following source categories:

• Consumer Products

• Portable Fuel Containers

• Adhesives and Sealants Application

• Diesel Engine Chip Reflash

• Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt Paving

• Asphalt Production Pla nts

• Cement Kilns

• Glass Furnaces

• Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional (ICI) Boilers

• Regional Fuels

• Electric Generating Units (EGUs)

This suite of controls for the above source categories constitutes a “ beyond

- on

- the

- way”
(BOTW) scenario to be used in m odeling ozone, fine particles, and regional haze in the

OTR and MANE

- VU region s

.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 2

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## For the MANE

- VU modeling inventory, each state was asked to complete a matrix to
identify which of the above source category control measures to include and in which years

t he control measure should be applied . This section documents the emission reductions
anticipated to result from the implementation of the above control measures based on the

state recommendations for measures to include for each state , source category, an d
projection year. There are five subsections discussing the control measure and emission
reductions for the five source category sectors: nonEGU point sources, area sources,

EGUs, onroad mobile sources, and nonroad mobile sources.

5.1 N ONEGU POINT SOURCES

T his Section describes the analysis of the control measures to reduce emissions from non

EGU point sources. The control measures included in this analysis reduce emissions for
the following pollutants and nonEGU point source categories:

• NOx m easures: asp halt production plants; cement kilns; glass and fiberglass
furnaces; low sulfur heating oil for commercial and instit ut ional units; and ICI
boilers (natural gas, #2 fuel oil, #4/#6 fuel oil, and coal);

• Primary PM10 and PM2.5 m easure: commercial heating oi l;

• SO2 m easures: commercial heating oil and ICI boilers ( #2 fuel oil, #4/#6 fuel oil,

and coal ) ; and

• VOC m easure: adhesives and sealants application;

For the MANE

- VU modeling inventory, each state was asked to complete a matrix to identify which nonEGU control measures to include and in which years the control

measure should be applied . Table 5. 1 summarize s the staff recommendations for NOx
control measures to include in the BOTW regional modeling inventory for non

- EGU

source categories ( except ICI boil ers )

. Table 5.2 summarizes the staff recommendations

for NOx emission reductions for ICI bo i lers. Tables 5.3 and 5. 4 summarize the staff
recommendations for control measures to include in the BOTW regional modeling
inventory for SO2 and VOC emissions, re spectively. The following subsections describe
the emission reductions anticipated for each of the control measures.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 3

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5. 1 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling

– NOx Emissions from NonEGU Point Sourc es

Asphalt
Production Plants Cement Kilns Glass and Fiberglass
Furnaces Commercial &
Institutional Heating Oil

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No Yes

DE No No No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No No

DC Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Yes Yes

ME No No No Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A No Yes Yes

MD No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

MA No No No N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

NH No No No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No Yes

NJ No Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A No Yes Yes 2 

### No 2 

### Yes Yes

NY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 2 

### Yes 3 

### No 3 

### Yes Yes

PA No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

RI No No No N/A N/A N/A No No No No Yes Yes

VT No No No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No No

Y es

- Include emission reductions from control measure in modeling inventory
No

- Do not include emission reduction from control measure in modeling inventory
N/A

– No facilities of this type located in the state 1) New York specified that a 40 percent NOx red uction from cement kilns should be used. 2) New Jersey specified a 20 percent NOx reduction from glass furnaces in 2012 and a 35 percent
reduction in 2018. 3) New York specified a 70 percent NOx reduction from glass furnaces beginning in 2009.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 4

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5. 2 St ate Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling

– NOx Emissions from ICI Boilers

ICI Boilers

< 25 mmBTU/hour ICI Boilers

25

- 50 mmBtu/hour ICI Boilers

50

- 100
mmBtu/hour ICI Boilers

100

- 250
mmBtu/hour ICI Boilers

>250 m mBtu/hour (see note 7)

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT Yes Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### Yes 1 

### No 1 

### No No

DE No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes 4 

### Yes 4 

### No 4 

### No No

DC No No No No No No N o No No No No No No No No

ME No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

MD No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No

MA No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

NH No No No Yes Yes 5 

### Yes 5 

### Yes 5 

### Yes Yes Yes Yes 5 

### Yes 5 

### No 5 

### No No

NJ Yes Yes 2 

### Ye s 2 

### No 2 

### Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No

NY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No

PA No No 3 

### No 3 

### No 3 

### No 3 

### No 3 

### No 3 

### No 3 

### No 3 

### No 3 

### No 6 

### No 6 

### No 6 

### No No

RI No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

VT No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Yes

- Include emission reductions from control measure in modeling inventory
No

- Do not include emission reduction from control measure in modeling inventory
N/A

– No facilities of this type located in the state 1) Connecticut is now pursuing adoption of model rule for boilers of all sizes at major and non

- major sources 2) New Jersey specified a 5 percent reduction in 2009, 10 percent in 2012, and 10 percent in 2018 3) Pennsylvania specified no reductions since sources already covered by statew ide NOx RACT regulation 4) Delaware is developing regulation for ICI boilers greater than 200 mmBtu/hour

– no plans for regulating
smaller units 5) New Hampshire specified a 40 percent reduction for 25

- 50 mmBtu/hour boilers, and a 10 percent reduction for natural gas

- fired 100

- 250 mmBtu/hour boilers 6) Pennsylvania specified no reductions since sources in the 5

- county Philadelphia area are already covered by the Small Sources of NOx regulation and do not plan on expanding the regulation outside of the corri dor at this
time 7) Resolution 06

- 02 specified the reduction for > 250mmBtu/hour boilers to be the “same as EGUs of similar size.” The OTC Commissioners have not yet recommended an emission rate or percent reduction for EGUs. As a result, no reductions f or ICI boilers > 250 mmBtu/hour were included in the BOTW inventory.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 5

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5. 3 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling

– SO2 Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Commercial &

Institutional Heating Oil ICI Boilers
(low sulfur fuel)

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT No No Yes No No No

DE No No No No No No

DC No Yes Yes No No No

ME No Yes Yes No No No

MD No Yes Yes No No No

MA No Yes Yes No No No

NH No No Yes No No No

NJ No Yes Yes No No No

NY No Yes Yes No No No

PA No Yes Yes No No No

RI No Yes Yes No No No

VT No No No No No No

Yes

- Include emission reductions from control measure in modeling inventory

No

- Do not include emission reduction from control measure in modeling inventoryFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 6

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Ta ble 5. 4 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling

– VOC Emissions from NonEGU Point Sources

Adhesives and
Sealants Application

State 2009 2012 2018

CT Yes Yes Yes

DE Yes Yes Yes

DC Yes Yes Yes

ME Yes Yes Yes

MD Yes Yes Yes

MA Yes Yes Yes

NH No Yes Yes

NJ No No 1 

### No 1



### NY 1



### Yes Yes Yes

PA Yes Yes Yes

RI Yes Yes Yes

VT No No No

Yes

- Include emission reductions from control measure in modeling inventory
No

- Do not include emission reduction from cont rol measure in modeling inventory

1) New Jersey indicated that the reductions from the adhesives and sealants application control measure should only apply to area source

- no reductions for point sources (SCC 4

- 02

- 007

- xx) were included due to inventory doubl e

- counting issues, not due to rule change
issues

.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 7

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 5.1.1 Adhesives and Sealants Application

The OTC 2006 model rule for adhesives and sealants is based on the reasonably available
control technology (RACT) and best available retrofit control technology (BA RCT)
determination by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) developed in 1998.
Adhesive and sealant emission sources are classified as both point sources and area
sources. About 96 percent of adhesive and sealant VOC emissions in the OTC states fall
into the area source category. The remaining four percent of the VOC emissions are
included in the point source inventory.

The emission reduction benefit estimation methodology is based on information developed
and used by CARB for their RACT/BARCT determ ination in 1998. For point sources, we
first identified those sources that were applying adhesives and sealants (using the source

classification code of 4

- 02

- 007

- xx, adhesives application). Next, we reviewed the
MANEVU inventory to determine whether thes e sources had existing capture and control

systems. Most of the sources did not have control information in the NIF database.

However, s everal sources reported capture and destruction efficiencies in the 70 to 99

percent range , with a few sources report i ng capture and destruction efficiencies of 99+
percent. Sources with existing control systems that exceed ed an 85 percent overall capture
and destruction efficiency would compl y with the OTC 2006 model rule provision for add

on air pollution control equip ment; therefore, no additional reductions were calculated for
these sources. For point sources without add

- on control equipment, we used the 64.4
percent reduction based on the CARB determination.

5.1.2 Asphalt Production Plants

In Resolution 06

- 02, t he OTC Co mmissioners recommended that OTC member states
pursue as necessary and appropriate state

- specific rulemakings or other implementation
methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies that
would result in about a 35 percen t reduction in NOx emissions. The reductions estimated
for this category only include emissions included in the MANE

- VU point source emission
inventory. Only emissions from major point sources are typically included in the MANE

VU point source database. Emissions from non

- major sources are not explicitly contained
in the area source inventory ; rather, t he emissions from non

- major asphalt plants are likely
lumped together in the general area source industrial and commercial fuel use category.

Therefore, there is some uncertainty regarding the actual reductions that will occur as since

minor sources are not specifically identified in the MANE

- VU inventory

.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 8

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 5.1.3 Cement Kilns

In Resolution 06

- 02, t he OTC Commissioners recommended that OTC member states

pursue as necessary and appropriate state

- specific rulemakings or other implementation

methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies that
would result in about a 60 percent reduction in NOx emissions from uncontrolled levels.

C ement kilns were al ready included in Phase I of the NO
x



## 5.1.4 Glass and Fiberglass Furnaces SIP call. Emission reductions
resulting from the NOx SIP call were accounted for in the 2009 OTB inventory. For the
cement kilns in Maryland and New York, a default control efficiency value of 25 pe rcent was applied to account for the reductions expected from the NOx SIP call. For the cement
kilns in Pennsylvania, the state provided their best estimates of the actual control
efficiency expected for each kiln after the NOx SIP Call. There is a cemen t kiln in Maine,
but it is not subject to the NOx SIP call. To calculate the additional reductions from the

OTC 2006 Control Measure, MACTEC back calculated uncontrolled emissions from the
2009 base year inventory based on the controls applied to account for the NOx SIP Call.
Once the uncontrolled emissions were calculated, MACTEC applied the 60 percent
emission reduction guideline recommended by the OTC Commissioners , except for the

kilns in New York

. Staff from New York indicated that a 40 percent emis sion reduction
should be used for modeling purposes.

In Resolution 06

- 02, t he OTC Commissioners recommended that OTC member states
pursue as necessary and appropriate state

- specific rulemakings or other implementation

methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies that
would result in about an 85 percent reduction in NOx emissions from uncontrolled levels.
The NOx emission reduction benefit was calculated by applying an 85 percent reduction to the projected 2009 base inventory, except in New Jersey and New York. New Jersey
specified a 20 percent NOx reduction from glass furnaces in 2012 and a 35 percent
reduction in 2018. New York specified a 70 percent NOx reduction from glass furnaces

be ginning in 2009. The estimated 85% reductions does not take into account existing

controls at the facilities

. The OTC states are currently working with the glass industry to
obtain additional data to better identify the controls already in place. This w ill allow for a

better calculation of the emission reduction benefits.

5.1.5 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers

In Resolution 06

- 02, the OTC Commissioners recommend ed that OTC member states
pursue as necessary and appropriate state

- specific rulema kings or other implementation
methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies for ICIFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 9

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## boilers based on guidelines that varied by boiler size and fuel type. Specifically, the
following guidelines were provided:

NOx Redu ction from 200 9 Base Emissions by Fuel Type

Boiler Size (mmBtu/hour) Natural Gas #2 Fuel Oil #4/#6 Fuel Oil Coal

< 25 10 10 10 10

25 to 50 50 50 50 50*

50 to 100 10 10 10 10*

100 to 250 75 40 40 40*

>250 **   ** 

* Resolution 06

- 02 did not specif y a percent reduction for coal; for modeling purposes, the same percent reduction specified for #4/#6 fuel oil was used for coal

** Resolution 06

- 02 specified the reduction for > 250mmBtu/hour boilers to be the “same as EGUs of similar

size.” The OTC Com missioners have not yet recommended an emission rate or percent reduction for EGUs. As a result, no reductions for ICI boilers > 250 mmBtu/hour were included in the BOTW inventory.



## Since the above guidelines vary by boiler size and fuel type, the specifi c percent reduction
applied to an individual source depends on the SCC and design capacity of the source. The
SCC identifies the fuel type, while the design capacity identifies the boiler size. In many
cases, the design capacities in the MANE

- VU NIF data base were missing. MACTEC used
the following hierarchy in filling in gaps where design capacities were missing.

• Use the design capacity field from the NIF EU table, if available;

• Use the design capacities provided by State/local agencies to fill in the da ta gaps (Allegheny County, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, Philadephia
County);

• Use design capacity as reported either the Unit Description field in the NIF EU
table or the Process Description field from the NIF EP table, if available;

• Use desi gn capacity from the source’s Title V permit, if the Title V permit was on

line;

• Use the SCC description to determine the design capacity (for example, SCC 1

- 02

- 006

- 01 describes a >100 mmBtu/hr natural gas

- fired boiler, SCC 1

- 02

- 006

- 02

describes a 10

- 100 mmBtu/hr natural gas

- fired boiler)

After performing this gap

- filling exercise, MACTEC was able to assign over 97 percent of
the NOx emissions to a specific boiler size range. For the remaining sources where
MACTEC could not determine the boiler size (whic h accounted for only 3 percent of the
NOx emissions), MACTEC assumed that these boilers were < 25 mmBtu/hr.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 10

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 5.1.6 Commercial and Institutional Heating Oil

The BOTW control measure for heating oil is based on NESCAUM’s report entitled “Low
Sulfur Heating Oil in t he Northeast States: An Overview of Benefits, Costs and
Implementation Issues.” NESCAUM estimates that reducing the sulfur content of heating
oil from 2,500 ppm to 500 ppm lowers SO2 emissions by 75 percent, PM emissions by 80
percent, NOx emissions by 10 percent. The 500 ppm sulfur heating oil is not expected to
available on a widespread basis until 2012 at the earliest. These percent reductions were
applied to commercial distillate oil category (SCC 1

- 03

- 005

- xx and 1

- 05

- 002

- 05 ). These
percent reductio ns were applied based on the state’s recommendations in the matrix which
identifies control measures to include and in which years the control measure should be
accounted for in the modeling inventory.

5.1.7 BOTW NonEGU Point Source NIF, SMOKE, and Summary Files

The Version 3 .1 file names and descriptions delivered to MARAMA are shown in Table 5

- 5

.

Table E

- 1 shows the anticipated percent reductions by SCC and year for the nonEGU point

source BOTW control measures.

5.1.8 BOTW NonEGU Point Source Emission Summaries

Emi ssion summaries by state, year, and pollutant are presented in Tables 5

- 6 through 5

- 1 2
for CO, NH3, NOx, PM10

- PRI, PM25

- PRI, SO2, and VOC, respectively.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 11

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 5 BOTW NonEGU Point Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

File Name Date Description

MAN EVU_BOTW2009_ NonEGU _NIFV3_ 1 .mdb Dec. 4, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 20 09 BOTW
nonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU _BOTW2012_NonEGU_ NIFV3_ 1 .mdb Dec. 4, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 201 2 BOTW
nonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU _BOTW2018_NonEGU_ NIFV3_ 1 .mdb Dec. 4, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2018 BOTW
nonEGU source NIF inventory

MANEVU _BOTW2009_NonEGU_IDA V3_ 1 .txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2009 BOTW
nonEGU source inventory in
SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU _BOTW2012_NonEGU_IDA V3_ 1 .txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2012 BOTW
nonEGU source in ventory in
SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU _BOTW2018_NonEGU_IDA 3 V

_ 1 .txt Nov. 22, 2006 Version 3. 1 of 2018 BOTW
nonEGU source inventory in
SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU OTB BOTW NonEGU V3_ 1 State Summary.xls Nov. 22, 2006 Spreadsheet with state totals by pollutant for a ll nonEGU

sources

MANEVU OTB BOTW NonEGU V3_ 1 State SCC Summary.xls Dec. 4, 2006 Spreadsheet with SCC totals by state and pollutant for all
nonEGU sources.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 12

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 6 NonEGU Point Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual CO Emission Projections (tons per year )

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 2,157 2,251 2,251 2,306 2,306 2,415 2,415

DE 8,812 9,037 9,037 8,748 8,748 8,651 8,651

DC 247 283 283 299 299 327 327

ME 9,043 10,147 10,147 10,467 10,467 11,433 11,433

MD 94, 536 104,012 104,012 111,174 111,174 141,342 141,342

MA 10,793 12,027 12,027 12,552 12,552 13,426 13,426

NH 774 858 858 871 871 907 907

NJ 8,209 10,076 10,076 10,806 10,806 12,244 12,244

NY 53,259 61,411 61,411 65,541 65,541 78,876 78,876

PA 105,815 11 6,430 116,430 121,251 121,251 140,908 140,908

RI 1,712 1,764 1,764 1,821 1,821 1,927 1,927

VT 220 250 250 254 254 267 267

Total 295,577 328,546 328,546 346,090 346,090 412,723 412,723

No BOTW controls were considered for CO.

0 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 13

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 7 NonEGU Point Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DE 153 145 145 138 138 134 134

DC 4 5 5 5 5 5 5

ME 700 796 796 809 809 859 859

MD 305 34 7 347 366 366 410 410

MA 462 510 510 521 521 563 563

NH 37 46 46 50 50 60 60

NJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NY 1,027 1,081 1,081 1,128 1,128 1,296 1,296

PA 1,170 1,307 1,307 1,363 1,363 1,591 1,591

RI 58 64 64 68 68 68 68

VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3,916 4,301 4,301 4,448 4,448 4,986 4,986

No BOTW controls were considered for NH3.

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW
2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 14

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 8 NonEGU Point Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NOx Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 6,773 7,236 6,820 7,465 7,047 7,921 7,501

DE 4,372 4,076 4,076 4,135 4,135 4,246 4,246

DC 480 548 548 577 577 627 627

ME 12,108 14,285 12,914 14,661 13,183 15,753 14,137

MD 21,940 19,401 16,015 20,399 16,819 22,797 18,888

MA 18,292 20,603 20,047 21,372 20,768 23 ,040 22,301

NH 1,188 1,384 1,120 1,394 1,131 1,435 1,169

NJ 15,812 16,498 16,463 17,091 15,901 18,805 17,464

NY 34,253 33,648 28,529 34,586 29,256 37,133 31,305

PA 89,136 89,932 76,215 93,526 72,779 103,137 79,186

RI 2,308 2,449 2,449 2,471 2,471 2,44 2 2,442

VT 386 462 462 460 460 466 466

Total 207,048 210,522 185,658 218,137 184,527 237,802 199,732

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 15

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 9 NonEGU Point Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 990 1,035 1,035 1,058 1,058 1,106 1,104

DE 1,820 1,486 1,486 1,475 1,475 1,487 1,487

DC 157 178 178 186 182 198 194

ME 6,120 7,088 7,088 7,133 7,114 7,496 7,477

MD 4,739 4,797 4,797 5,040 5,039 5,828 5,827

MA 4,212 5,006 5,006 5,088 5,004 5,314 5,227

NH 918 1,084 1,084 1,097 1,097 1,129 1,129

NJ 3,439 4,205 4,205 4,417 4,412 4,959 4,953

NY 5,072 5,221 5,221 5,444 5,395 6,098 6,048

PA 23,282 25,169 25,169 26,307 26,258 29,516 29,466

RI 296 333 333 331 318 330 316

VT 235 267 267 272 272 296 296

Total 51,280 55,869 55,869 57,848 57,624 63,757 63,524

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 16

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 10 NonEGU Point Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2 018
BOTW

CT 822 871 871 894 894 939 937

DE 1,606 1,256 1,256 1,245 1,245 1,254 1,254

DC 128 145 145 152 149 164 161

ME 4,899 5,675 5,675 5,690 5,678 5,935 5,922

MD 2,772 2,861 2,861 3,011 3,010 3,503 3,501

MA 2,953 3,554 3,554 3,574 3,510 3,660 3,594

NH 857 1,008 1,008 1,021 1,021 1,052 1,052

NJ 2,947 3,588 3,588 3,764 3,760 4,234 4,230

NY 3,355 3,535 3,535 3,688 3,646 4,161 4,117

PA 12,360 13,578 13,578 14,159 14,114 15,878 15,831

RI 180 200 200 198 188 194 184

VT 198 226 226 229 229 246 246

T otal 33,077 36,497 36,497 37,625 37,444 41,220 41,029

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 17

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 11 NonEGU Point Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 2,438 2,528 2,528 2,56 7 2,567 2,644 2,596

DE 35,706 7,117 7,117 7,401 7,401 7,610 7,610

DC 618 707 707 735 533 780 554

ME 14,412 18,656 18,656 18,492 18,393 18,794 18,692

MD 34,193 34,223 34,223 35,373 35,342 38,921 38,886

MA 14,766 18,185 18,185 18,442 17,305 18,955 17,77 8

NH 2,436 3,099 3,099 3,098 3,098 3,114 3,099

NJ 9,797 7,141 7,141 7,234 7,196 7,855 7,816

NY 58,227 62,922 62,922 64,484 64,432 67,545 67,491

PA 88,259 90,735 90,735 93,441 93,206 99,924 99,681

RI 2,651 3,163 3,163 3,182 3,018 3,164 3,000

VT 874 1, 182 1,182 1,147 1,147 1,127 1,127

Total 264,377 249,658 249,658 255,596 253,638 270,433 268,330

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 18

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 12 NonEGU Point Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual VOC Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 201 8
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 4,604 4,114 4,111 4,152 4,149 4,230 4,227

DE 4,645 2,987 2,981 2,311 2,305 1,993 1,987

DC 69 72 72 75 75 85 85

ME 4,477 4,740 4,740 4,985 4,985 5,709 5,708

MD 5,676 5,297 5,279 5,578 5,559 6,301 6,279

MA 7,794 8,381 8,273 9,061 8 ,940 10,564 10,418

NH 1,459 1,060 1,005 1,132 1,069 1,294 1,219

NJ 13,318 16,702 16,702 17,621 17,621 19,915 19,915

NY 9,933 10,157 10,141 10,750 10,732 12,354 12,333

PA 36,326 35,875 35,548 38,162 37,795 44,537 44,085

RI 1,898 1,640 1,628 1,695 1,683 1,812 1,799

VT 1,079 1,254 1,238 1,365 1,347 1,730 1,707

Total 91,278 92,279 91,718 96,887 96,260 110,524 109,762

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 19

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 5.2 A REA SOURCES

This Section describes the analysis of the OTC and MANE

- VU control measures to reduce

emissions from area sources . The control measures included in this analysis reduce

emissions for the following pollutants and area source categories:

• NOx m easures: ICI boilers (natural gas, #2 fuel oil, #4/#6 fuel oil, and coal) and
residential and commercial home heating oil;

• Primary PM10 and PM2.5 m easures: residential and commercial home heating oil;

• SO2 m easures: residential and commercial home heating oil, and ICI bo ilers
(distillate oil)

.

• VOC measures: adhesives and sealants, emulsified and cutback asphalt paving,
consumer produc ts, and portable fuel containers;

For the MANE

- VU modeling inventory, each state was asked to complete a matrix identify
which control measures to include and in which years the control measure should be

a pplied . Tables 5. 13 , 5. 14 , and 5. 15 summarize th e staff recommendations for control
measures to include in the BOTW regional modeling inventory for NOx, SO2, and VOC
respectively . The following subsections describe the emission reductions anticipated for

each of the area source control measures.

5.2.1 Adhesi ves and Sealants

The OTC 2006 model rule for adhesives and sealants is based on the reasonably available
control technology (RACT) and best available retrofit control technology (BARCT)
determination by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) developed i n 1998.
Adhesive and sealant emission sources are classified as both point sources and area
sources. About 96 percent of adhesive and sealant VOC emissions in the OTC states fall
into the area source category. The remaining four percent of the VOC emiss ions are
included in the point source inventory.

The emission reduction benefit estimation methodology for area sources is based on
information developed and used by CARB for their RACT/BARCT determination in 1998.

CARB estimates that the total industrial adhesive and sealant emissions in California to be
about 45 tons per day (tpd). Solvent

- based adhesive and sealant emissions are estimated to

be about 35 tpd of VOC and water

- based adhesive and sealant emissions are about 10 tpd

of VOC.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 20

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5. 13 St ate Staff Recommendations for Control Measures to Include in BOTW
Regional Modeling

– NOx Area Sources

ICI Boilers

< 25 mmBTU/hour ICI Boilers

25

- 50 mmBtu/hour ICI Boilers

50

- 100 mmBtu/hour Residential and
Commercial Home Heating Oil

State 2009 2012 20 18 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes

DE No No No No No No No No No No No No

DC No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

ME No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

MD No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

MA No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

NH No No No No No No No No No No No Yes

NJ No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

NY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

PA No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

RI No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

VT No 1 

### No No No No No No No No No No No

Yes

- Include emission reductions from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventory

No

- Do not include emission reduction from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventoryFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 21

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5. 14 State Staff Recommendations for Control Measures

to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling

– SO2 Area Sources

ICI Boilers

< 25 mmBTU/hour ICI Boilers

25

- 50 mmBtu/hour ICI Boilers

50

- 100 mmBtu/hour Residential Home Heating Oil

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT No No No No No No No No No No No Yes

DE No No No No No No No No No No No No

DC No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

ME No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

MD No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

MA No No No N o No No No No No No Yes Yes

NH No No No No No No No No No No No Yes

NJ No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

NY No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

PA No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

RI No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes

VT No 1 

### No No No No No No No No No No No

Yes

- Include emission reductions from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventory

No

- Do not include emission reduction from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventoryFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 22

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5. 15 State Staff Recommendations for Control M easures

to Include in BOTW Regional Modeling

– VOC Area Sources

Adhesives and
Sealants Emulsified and
Cutback Asphalt Paving Consumer Products Portable Fuel
Containers

State 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018 2009 2012 2018

CT Yes Yes Yes Ye s Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

DE Yes Yes Yes No No 2 

### No 2 

### Yes 2 

### Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

DC Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

ME Yes Yes Yes No No 3 

### No 3 

### Yes 3 

### Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

MD Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

MA Yes Yes Ye s Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

NH No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

NJ Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

NY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

PA Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

RI Yes Yes Y es Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

VT No 1 

### No No No No No No No No No No No

Yes

- Include emission reductions from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling inventory
No

- Do not include emission reduction from OTC 2006 control measure in modeling invento ry 1) Vermont indicated that the modeling inventory should not reflect anything beyond the 2002 OTC
control level for these source categories in Vermont. 2) Delaware’s existing asphalt paving regulations are more stringent than the OTC 2006 control

measure. 3) Ma ine has not yet determined whether to include emission reductions from the OTC 2006 control measure for asphalt paving. Maine’s inventory includes emissions only from cutback asphalt; no emissions are reported for emulsified asphalt.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 23

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## CARB estimated tha t emission reductions achieved by statewide compliance with the VOC
limits in the RACT/BARCT determination will range from approximately 29 to 35 tpd
(CARB 1998, pg. 18). These emission reductions correspond to a 64.4 to 77.8 percent

reduction from uncont rolled levels. For OTC modeling purposes, we used the lower end
of this range (i.e., 64.4 percent reduction) to estimate the emission benefit for area sources

due to the OTC 2006 model rule.

5.2.2 Asphalt Paving

The OTC current guideline for asphalt paving ca lls for a complete ban on the use of
cutback asphalt during the ozone season and limits the VOC content of emulsified asphalt

to two percent or less. The proposal is still under evaluation. A 20 percent reduction in
emissions from emulsified asphalt was assumed for the modeling inventory

.

The current regulations in all MANE

- VU states generally ban the use of cutback asphalt
during the ozone season. In some states, there are a few exemptions from the ban that
allow for the use of cutback during the ozon e season. It has not yet been determined
whether states will modify their cutback asphalt rules to eliminate the exemptions. Since
the VOC emissions from the use of cutback asphalt during the ozone season are generally
very small, MACTEC assumed that the re will be no additional emission reductions from
the use of cutback asphalt during the ozone season.

The emission reductions resulting from the two percent VOC content limit on emulsified
asphalt depend on the baseline VOC content of emulsified asphalt. The baseline VOC
content may range from 0 to 12 percent. New Jersey used a VOC content of 8 percent in
their baseline emission calculations (based on the 8 percent limit in their current rule )

. Reducing the VOC content to 2 percent in New Jersey will res ult in a 75 percent reduction.
Delaware already bans the use of emulsified asphalt that contains any VOC, so there is no
reduction in Delaware. Several other states used an average VOC content of 2.5 percent
when developing their emission inventory. Thu s, reducing the average VOC content from
2.5 percent to 2.0 percent results in a 20 percent reduction in VOC emissions. For States
that did not supply a baseline VOC content for asphalt paving, we used the 20 percent

reduction in VOC emissions from emulsi fied asphalt paving during the ozone season.

5.2.3 Consumer Products

The OTC 2006 model rule will modify the OTC 2001 model rule based on amendments
adopted by CARB in July 2005. The emission reduction benefit estimation methodology

is based on information de veloped by CARB. CARB estimates 6.05 tons per day of VOC
reduced from their July 2005 amendments (CARB 2004, pg. 8), excluding the benefitsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 24

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## from the two products ( anti

- static products and shaving gels) with compliance dates in
2008 or 2009. This equates to about 2,208 tons per year. The population of California as
of July 1, 2005 is 36,132,147 (Census 2006). On a per capita basis, the emission reduction
from the CARB July 2005 amendments equals 0.122 lbs/capita.

Since the OTC’s 2006 control measure is very similar to the CARB July 2005 amendments
(with the exclusion of the anti

- static products and shaving gel 2008/2009 limits), the per
capita emission reductions are expected to be the same in the OTR. The per capita factor
after the implementation of the OTC 2001 model rule is 6.06 lbs/capita (Pechan 2001, pg.
8). The percentage reduction from the OTC’s 2006 control measure was computed as

shown below:

Current OTC Emission Factor = 6.06 lbs/capita

Benefit from CARB 2005 amendments = 0.122 lbs/capita

Percent Reduction =

= 100%*(1

- (6.06

– 0.122)/6.06)

2.0%

The 2.0% reduction will be applied to all states except Vermont, which indicated that they
do not want the modeling inventory to reflect anything beyond the 2002 OTC control level
for consumer pro ducts in Vermont.

5.2.4 Portable Fuel Containers

The OTC 2006 model rule will modify the OTC 2001 model rule based on amendments
adopted by CARB in 2006. Estimated emission reductions were based on information
compiled by CARB to support their recent amendment s. CARB estimated that PFC
emissions in 2015 will be 31.9 tpd in California with no additional controls or amendments

to the 2000 PFC rules. CARB further estimates that the 2006 amendment will reduce
emission from PFCs by 18.4 tpd in 2015 in California c ompared to the 2000 PFC
regulations. Thus, at full implementation, the expected incremental reduction is
approximately 58 percent, after an estimated 7 5 percent reduction from the original 2000

rule (CARB later adjusted the reduction to 65 percent due to unanticipated problems with
spillage from the new cans)

.

The OTC calculations assume that States will adopt the rule by July 2007 and will provide
manufacturers one year from the date of the rule to comply. Thus, new compliant PFCs

will not be on the mar ket until July 2008. Assuming a 10

- year turnover to compliant cans,
only 10 percent of the existing inventory of PFCs will comply with the new requirements
in the summer of 2009. Therefore, only 10 percent of the full emission benefit estimated
by CARB w ill occur by 2009

– the incremental reduction will be about 5.8 percent inFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 25

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 2009. In 2012, there will be a 40 percent turnover to compliant cans, resulting in an
incremental reductions of about 23.2 percent. By 2018, the will be 100 percent penetration

to compliant PFCs, resulting in an incremental reduction of 58 percent in 2018.

The emission reductions from the 2006 OTC PFC model rule were calculated only for the
emissions accounted for in the area source inventory. Additional benefits (not estimated

fo r this report) would be expected from equipment refueling vapor displacement and
spillage that is accounted for in the nonroad inventory.

5.2.5 Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers

In Resolution 06

- 02, the OTC Commissioners recommended that OTC member sta tes pursue as necessary and appropriate state

- specific rulemakings or other implementation
methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies for ICI
boilers based on guidelines that varied by boiler size and fuel type. Sp ecifically, the
following guidelines were provided:

NOx Reduction from 200 9 Base Emissions by Fuel Type

Boiler Size (mmBtu/hour) Natural Gas #2 Fuel Oil #4/#6 Fuel Oil Coal

< 25 10 10 10 10

25 to 50 50 50 50 50*

50 to 100 10 10 10 10*

100 to 250 75 4 0 40 40*

>250 **   ** 

* Resolution 06

- 02 did not specify a percent reduction for coal; for modeling purposes, the same percent

reduction specified for #4/#6 fuel oil was used for coal

** Resolution 06

- 02 specified the reduction for > 250mmBtu/hour b oilers to be the “same as EGUs of similar

size.” The OTC Commissioners have not yet recommended an emission rate or percent reduction for EGUs. As a result, no reductions for ICI boilers > 250 mmBtu/hour were included in the BOTW inventory.



## Since the ab ove guidelines vary by boiler size and fuel type, the specific percent reduction
applied to an area source category depends on the SCC and design capacity of the source.
The SCC identifies the fuel type (for example, SCC 21

- 02

- 004

- xxx describes distillate oil

fired industrial boilers, SCC 21

- 02

- 006

- xxx de scribes natural gas

- fired industrial boiler s ).
The area source inventory does not contain any information on the sizes of the units
included in the inventories. To apportion area source emissions to the b oiler size ranges

listed above, MACTEC used data from the Characterization of the U.S.
Industrial/Commercial Boiler Population ( May 2005

, Oak Ridge National Laboratory ).

We used the national estimates of b oiler capacity by size from Table ES

- 1 of the OakFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 26

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Ridge report to calculate the percentage of total boiler capacity in each size range. Since
the Oak Ridge report distinguished between industrial boilers and commercial/institutional
boilers, we developed separate profiles for industrial boilers and for

c ommercial/institutional boilers. We used these boiler size profiles to calculate weighted
average percent reductions industrial boilers by fuel type and commercial/institutional
boilers by fuel type.

5.2.6 Residential and Commercial Heating Oil

The BOTW contr ol measure for heating oil is based on NESCAUM’s report entitled “Low
Sulfur Heating Oil in the Northeast States: An Overview of Benefits, Costs and
Implementation Issues.” NESCAUM estimates that reducing the sulfur content of heating
oil from 2, 0 00 ppm t o 500 ppm lowers SO2 emissions by 75 percent, PM emissions by 80
percent, NOx emissions by 10 percent. The 500 ppm sulfur heating oil is not expected to
available on a widespread basis until 2012 at the earliest. These percent reductions were
applied to residential distillate oil category (SCC 21

- 04

- 004

- xxx) and commercial distillate
oil category (SCC 21

- 03

- 004

- xxx). These percent reductions were applied based on the

state’s recommendations in the matrix which identifies control measures to include and i n which years the control measure should be accounted for in the modeling inventory.

5.2.7 BOTW Area Source NIF, SMOKE, and Summary Files

The Version 3 file names and descriptions delivered to MARAMA are shown in Table 5

- 16

.

Table E

- 1 shows the anticipated perce nt reductions by SCC and year for the nonEGU point

source BOTW control measures.

5.2.8 BOTW Area Source Emission Summaries

Emission summaries by state, year, and pollutant are presented in Tables 5

- 17 through 5

- 23 for CO, NH3, NOx, PM10

- PRI, PM25

- PRI, SO2, and VOC, respectively.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 27

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 16 BOTW Area Source NIF, IDA, and Summary File Names

File Name Date Description

MANEVU_BOTW2009_Area_NIFV3_2.mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 20 09 BOTW

area source NIF inventory

MANEVU _BOTW2012_Area_ NIFV3_ 2 .mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 201 2 BOTW

area source NIF inventory

MANEVU _BOTW2018_Area_ NIFV3_ 2 .mdb Nov. 9, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 2018 BOTW

area source NIF inventory

MANEVU _BOTW2009_Area_IDA V3_ 2 .txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 2009 BOTW

area source inventory in
SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU _BOTW2012_Area_IDA V3_ 2 .txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 2012 BOTW

area source inventory in
SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU _BOTW2018_Area_IDA 3 V

_ 2 .txt Nov. 20, 2006 Version 3. 2 of 2018 BOTW

area source inventory in
SMOKE IDA format

MANEVU OTB BOTW A rea V3_ 2 State Summary.xls Nov. 8, 2006 Spreadsheet with state totals by pollutant for all area sources

MANEVU OTB BOTW Area V3_ 2 State SCC Summary.xls Nov. 8, 2006 Spreadsheet with SCC totals by state and pollutant for all area

sources.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 28

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 17 A rea Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual CO Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 70,198 65,865 65,865 63,874 63,874 59,797 59,797

DE 14,052 15,395 15,395 15,233 15,233 14,864 14,864

D C 2,300 2,417 2,417 2,460 2,460 2,512 2,512

ME 109,223 102,743 102,743 99,877 99,877 94,181 94,181

MD 141,178 143,653 143,653 144,233 144,233 144,649 144,649

MA 137,496 132,797 132,797 130,255 130,255 125,205 125,205

NH 79,647 76,504 76,504 75,319 75,3 19 73,038 73,038

NJ 97,657 90,432 90,432 88,048 88,048 83,119 83,119

NY 356,254 336,576 336,576 327,118 327,118 307,659 307,659

PA 266,935 266,887 266,887 264,012 264,012 257,396 257,396

RI 8,007 8,007 8,007 8,026 8,026 8,024 8,024

VT 43,849 42,683 42 ,683 42,172 42,172 41,283 41,283

Total 1,326,796 1,283,959 1,283,959 1,260,627 1,260,627 1,211,727 1,211,727

No BOTW controls were considered for CO.

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 29

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 18 Area Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NH3 Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2 009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 5,318 5,208 5,208 5,156 5,156 5,061 5,061

DE 13,279 13,316 13,316 13,328 13,328 13,342 13,342

DC 14 16 16 16 16 17 17

ME 8,747 10,453 10,453 11,116 11,116 12,312 12,312

MD 25,834 31,879 31,879 34,222 34,222 38,155 38,155

MA 18,809 19,131 19,131 19,275 19,275 19,552 19,552

NH 2,158 2,466 2,466 2,584 2,584 2,789 2,789

NJ 17,572 19,457 19,457 20,154 20,154 21,435 21,435

NY 67,422 81,626 81,626 87,116 87,116 96,078 96,078

PA 79,911 98,28 1 98,281 105,418 105,418 117,400 117,400

RI 883 945 945 972 972 1,025 1,025

VT 9,848 12,156 12,156 13,062 13,062 14,580 14,580

Total 249,795 294,934 294,934 312,419 312,419 341,746 341,746

No BOTW controls were considered for NH3.

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 30

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 19 Area Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual NOx Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 12,689 13,173 12,245 13,342 12,389 13,388 11,795

DE 2,608 2,821 2,821 2,913 2,913 3,014 3,014

DC 1,644 1, 961 1,961 2,081 2,052 2,259 2,229

ME 7,360 7,477 7,477 7,486 7,095 7,424 7,036

MD 15,678 16,858 16,858 17,315 17,007 18,073 17,746

MA 34,281 35,732 35,732 36,331 35,321 37,187 36,199

NH 10,960 11,879 11,879 12,055 12,055 12,430 12,180

NJ 26,692 24,032 24,032 23,981 21,976 23,660 21,684

NY 98,803 106,375 95,190 107,673 92,935 108,444 93,639

PA 47,591 50,162 50,162 50,793 49,773 50,829 49,829

RI 3,886 4,149 4,149 4,260 4,112 4,397 4,249

VT 3,208 3,419 3,419 3,429 3,429 3,430 3,430

Total 265,400 278, 038 265,925 281,659 261,057 284,535 263,030

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 31

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 20 Area Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM10

- PRI Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 48,281 48,970 48,970 49,004 49,004 49,479 48,734

DE 13,039 13,928 13,928 14,236 14,236 14,844 14,844

DC 3,269 3,511 3,511 3,605 3,547 3,825 3,762

ME 168,953 175,979 175,979 179,689 179,004 189,619 188,928

MD 95,060 105,944 105,944 110,141 109,829 117,396 117,066

MA 192,860 198,668 198, 668 200,692 200,215 204,922 204,456

NH 43,328 46,060 46,060 47,187 47,187 49,801 49,544

NJ 61,601 61,684 61,684 61,284 60,916 60,880 60,519

NY 369,595 382,124 382,124 385,925 383,234 392,027 389,385

PA 391,897 421,235 421,235 432,844 431,787 454,970 45 3,934

RI 8,295 8,962 8,962 9,244 8,976 9,797 9,514

VT 56,131 60,521 60,521 62,465 62,465 66,916 66,916

Total 1,452,309 1,527,586 1,527,586 1,556,316 1,550,400 1,614,476 1,607,602

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 32

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 21 Area Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual PM25

- PRI Emission P rojections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 14,247 13,766 13,766 13,517 13,517 13,033 12,366

DE 3,204 3,387 3,387 3,403 3,403 3,426 3,426

DC 805 860 860 879 827 917 860

ME 32,774 33,026 33,026 3 3,189 32,576 33,820 33,201

MD 27,318 28,923 28,923 29,508 29,228 30,449 30,153

MA 42,083 43,121 43,121 43,186 42,820 43,438 43,080

NH 17,532 17,965 17,965 18,050 18,050 18,316 18,087

NJ 19,350 18,590 18,590 18,271 17,924 17,653 17,313

NY 87,154 87,576 87,576 87,260 85,011 86,422 84,211

PA 74,925 79,169 79,169 80,728 79,775 83,570 82,637

RI 2,064 2,184 2,184 2,232 1,996 2,316 2,068

VT 11,065 11,482 11,482 11,652 11,652 12,059 12,059

Total 332,521 340,049 340,049 341,875 336,779 345,419 339,461

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 33

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 22 Area Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual SO2 Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 12,418 12,581 12,581 12,604 12,604 12,184 3,398

DE 1,588 1,599 1,599 1,602 1,602 1,545 1 ,545

DC 1,337 1,487 1,487 1,541 499 1,632 522

ME 13,149 13,776 13,776 13,846 4,897 13,901 4,940

MD 12,393 13,685 13,685 14,074 8,762 14,741 9,118

MA 25,488 25,961 25,961 26,029 8,414 25,570 8,357

NH 7,072 7,463 7,463 7,470 7,470 7,421 3,118

NJ 10,744 10,672 10,672 10,697 4,435 10,510 4,374

NY 130,409 139,589 139,589 140,154 98,160 141,408 100,452

PA 63,679 67,535 67,535 67,446 49,212 66,363 48,475

RI 4,557 5,024 5,024 5,189 1,316 5,398 1,368

VT 4,087 4,646 4,646 4,687 4,687 4,764 4,764

Total 286, 921 304,018 304,018 305,339 202,058 305,437 190,431

0 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002 2009 OTB/W 2009 BOTW 2012 OTB/W 2012 BOTW 2018 OTB/W 2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 34

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table 5

- 23 Area Sources
OTB/OTW and BOTW Annual VOC Emission Projections (tons per year)

2002 2009
OTB/W 2009
BOTW 2012
OTB/W 2012
BOTW 2018
OTB/W 2018
BOTW

CT 87,302 75,693 73,738 73,560 71, 249 71,274 68,395

DE 15,519 14,245 13,794 13,943 13,408 13,744 13,066

DC 6,432 5,420 5,300 5,352 5,144 5,255 4,991

ME 100,621 91,910 90,869 91,667 90,457 92,410 90,866

MD 120,254 110,385 107,527 108,067 104,400 110,046 104,615

MA 162,145 148,625 145,0 59 145,674 140,848 140,558 134,963

NH 65,370 63,069 61,860 63,356 61,913 64,368 62,649

NJ 167,882 147,617 143,089 143,752 138,646 139,626 134,089

NY 507,292 462,811 451,669 456,856 443,940 457,421 440,892

PA 240,785 228,444 219,733 230,393 219,897 243, 421 230,011

RI 31,402 26,695 26,572 25,548 25,315 23,561 23,305

VT 23,265 24,068 24,068 24,635 24,634 26,198 26,197

Total 1,528,269 1,398,982 1,363,278 1,382,803 1,339,851 1,387,882 1,334,039

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 550,000

CT DE DC ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VTEmissions (tpy) 2002

2009 OTB/W

2009 BOTW

2012 OTB/W

2012 BOTW

2018 OTB/W

2018 BOTWFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projection s February 28, 2007
Section 5

– Beyond

- On

- The

- Way Emission Inventory Page 5

- 35

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## 5.3 Nonroad Mobile Sources

In the June 2007 MOU, the OTC Co mmissioners recommended that states pursue state

specific rulemakings for one nonroad source categories

– portable fuel containers

. The
OTC 2006 control measure for portable fuel containers will result in addition VOC

emission reduction from the refuelin g of nonroad equipment. However, these reductions

could not be estimated due to resource and time constraints.

5.4 Electric Generating Units

In the June 2008 Statement on EGUs, the OTC Commissioners directed OTC staff to
complete an evaluation and recommendat ions for a program beyond CAIR that includes
strategies to address the base, intermediate and peak load emissions. No specific emission
reduction targets were identified. States specified that no additional reductions from EGUs

be included in the BOTW in ventory.

5.5 Onroad Mobile Sources

In Resolution 06

- 02, the OTC Commissioners recommended that the OTC member states
pursue a region fuel program consistent with the Energy Act of 2005. No specific
emission reduction targets were identified. States specified that no additional reductions
from onroad mobile sources be included in the BOTW inventory.

In the June 2007 MOU, the OTC Commissioners recommended that states pursue state

specific rulemakings to implement a mandatory diesel engine chip reflash program. It is
our understanding that the emission reductions from the diesel engine chip reflash program
are already accounted for in MANE

- VU’s OTB emission inventory.Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix A

– Non EGU Point Source Growth Factors Page A

- 1

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# Appendix A

– NonEGU Point Source Growth Factors

Table A

- 1 Connecticut Growth Factors by SIC Code

SIC GF_02_09 GF_02_12 GF_02_18 CTDOL_CAT

0181 1.0019 1.0027 1.0042 Agricultural, Crop Production

1422 0.9400 0.9143 0.8629 Mining

1429 0.9400 0.9143 0.8629 Mining

2051 0.9355 0.9079 0.8526 Manufacturing, Food

2096 0.9355 0.9079 0.8526 Manufactur ing, Food

2261 0.9254 0.8934 0.8295 Manufacturing, Textile Product Mills

2262 0.9254 0.8934 0.8295 Manufacturing, Textile Product Mills

2284 0.9254 0.8934 0.8295 Manufacturing, Textile Product Mills

2298 0.9254 0.8934 0.8295 Manufacturing, Textile Prod uct Mills

2434 1.0679 1.0969 1.1551 Manufacturing, Wood Products

2522 1.0435 1.0621 1.0994 Manufacturing, Furniture & Related

2541 1.0679 1.0969 1.1551 Manufacturing, Wood Products

2621 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2631 0.8706 0.8152 0.70 43 Manufacturing, Paper

2652 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2653 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2672 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2673 0.8706 0.8152 0.7043 Manufacturing, Paper

2711 0.8386 0.7695 0.6312 Manufacturing , Printing & Related Activ

2752 0.8386 0.7695 0.6312 Manufacturing, Printing & Related Activ

2754 0.8386 0.7695 0.6312 Manufacturing, Printing & Related Activ

2759 0.8386 0.7695 0.6312 Manufacturing, Printing & Related Activ

2821 1.1024 1.1464 1.2342 M anufacturing, Chemical

2833 1.1024 1.1464 1.2342 Manufacturing, Chemical

2869 1.1024 1.1464 1.2342 Manufacturing, Chemical

2875 1.1024 1.1464 1.2342 Manufacturing, Chemical

3052 0.9591 0.9416 0.9066 Manufacturing, Plastic & Rubber Product

3069 0.9591 0.9416 0.9066 Manufacturing, Plastic & Rubber Product

3081 0.9591 0.9416 0.9066 Manufacturing, Plastic & Rubber Product

3086 0.9591 0.9416 0.9066 Manufacturing, Plastic & Rubber Product

3087 0.9591 0.9416 0.9066 Manufacturing, Plastic & Rubber Product

3272 0.9841 0.9772 0.9636 Manufacturing, Miscellaneous

3312 0.8713 0.8162 0.7059 Manufacturing, Primary Metal

3351 0.8713 0.8162 0.7059 Manufacturing, Primary Metal

3357 0.8713 0.8162 0.7059 Manufacturing, Primary Metal

3423 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufa cturing, Fabricated Metal

3429 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3444 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3469 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3471 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3479 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3497 0.9150 0.8786 0.8057 Manufacturing, Fabricated Metal

3562 0.8778 0.8254 0.7206 Manufacturing, MachineryFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix A

– Non EGU Point Source Growth Factors Page A

- 2

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

### SIC GF_02_09 GF_02_12 GF_02_18 CTDOL_CAT

3569 0.8778 0.8254 0.7206 Manufacturing, Machinery

3579 0.8452 0.7788 0.6461 M anufacturing, Computer & Electronic Eq

3634 0.9149 0.8784 0.8054 Manufacturing, Electrical Equipment, Ap

3675 0.9149 0.8784 0.8054 Manufacturing, Electrical Equipment, Ap

3714 0.9705 0.9578 0.9326 Manufacturing, Transportation Equipment

3721 0.9705 0.9 578 0.9326 Manufacturing, Transportation Equipment

3724 0.9705 0.9578 0.9326 Manufacturing, Transportation Equipment

3728 0.9705 0.9578 0.9326 Manufacturing, Transportation Equipment

3731 0.9705 0.9578 0.9326 Manufacturing, Transportation Equipment

382 7 0.9841 0.9772 0.9636 Manufacturing, Miscellaneous

3949 0.9841 0.9772 0.9636 Manufacturing, Miscellaneous

3951 0.9841 0.9772 0.9636 Manufacturing, Miscellaneous

4226 1.0921 1.1316 1.2106 Transportation & Warehousing, Warehousi

4911 0.9550 0.9358 0.897 2 Utilities

4922 0.9550 0.9358 0.8972 Utilities

4924 0.9550 0.9358 0.8972 Utilities

4931 1.1439 1.2056 1.3290 Waste Management & Remediation Services

4952 1.1439 1.2056 1.3290 Waste Management & Remediation Services

4953 1.1439 1.2056 1.3290 Waste Man agement & Remediation Services

4961 0.9550 0.9358 0.8972 Utilities

5171 1.0605 1.0864 1.1382 Wholesale Trade, Nondurable Goods

6036 1.0569 1.0814 1.1302 Finance & Insurance

6512 1.0197 1.0282 1.0451 Real Estate & Rental & Leasing

6513 1.0197 1.0282 1. 0451 Real Estate & Rental & Leasing

7389 1.0569 1.0814 1.1302 Finance & Insurance

8051 1.0824 1.1177 1.1883 Health Care & Social Assistance, Nursin

8062 1.0583 1.0833 1.1334 Health Care & Social Assistance, Hospit

8063 1.0583 1.0833 1.1334 Health Care & Social Assistance, Hospit

8211 1.0642 1.0918 1.1468 Educational Services

8221 1.0642 1.0918 1.1468 Educational Services

8631 1.0642 1.0918 1.1468 Educational Services

8734 1.1189 1.1699 1.2718 Professional, Scientific, and Technical

9223 1.0185 1.02 64 1.0423 Government

9511 1.0185 1.0264 1.0423 Government

9621 1.0185 1.0264 1.0423 Government

9711 1.0185 1.0264 1.0423 Government

3900 0.9841 0.9772 0.9636 Manufacturing, Miscellaneous

5093 1.0527 1.0754 1.1206 Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods

4200 0 .9871 0.9815 0.9705 Transportation & Warehousing, Truck TraFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix A

– Non EGU Point Source Growth Factors Page A

- 3

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table A

- 2 Non

- EGU Point Source Growth Factors by S C C Code

See Electronic File : MANE

- VU _NonEGU_gf_scc.xls

This table contains 12,791 records with NonEGU point source growth factors by county an d SCC.

The format for the tables is as follows:

Column A

– County FIPS code

Column B

– Source Classification Code (SCC)

Column C

– EGAS_02_09 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column D

– AEO5_02_09 this is the DOE AEO 2005 fact or for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column E

– ST_02_09 this is the state

- supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column F

– GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2009 (it

is the state

- supplied factor, if avai lable; if no state

- supplied factor, then it is the AEO2005
factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column G

– EGAS_02_12 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column H

– AEO5_02_12 this is the DOE AEO 20 05 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column I

– ST_02_12 this is the state

- supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column J

– GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2012 (it

is the state

- supplied factor, if available; if no state

- supplied factor, then it is the AEO2005
factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column K

– EGAS_02_18 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018

Column J

– AEO5_02_18 this is the DOE AEO 2005 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018

Column M

– ST_02_18 this is the state

- supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018

Column N

– GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2012 (it

is the state

- supplied f actor, if available; if no state

- supplied factor, then it is the AEO2005
factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column O

– SCC descriptionFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 1

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# Appendix B

– NonEGU Point Source Control Factors

Table B

- 1 NonEGU Emission Units A ffected by the NOx SIP Call Phase I

FIPS SITE ID Facility Name EU ID Ozone
Season
Allowance (tpy) Prorated
Annual
Emissions (tpy) Unit Description

09003 1509 PRATT & WHITNEY DIV UTC P0049 11 26 FT

- 8 COGENERATION GAS
TURBINE

09011 0604 PFIZER INC P0001 33 79 BLR B&W FM140

- 97 #8

09011 0604 PFIZER INC R0012 31 74 BLR CE #5 (101

- 4)

09011 3102 SPRAGUE PAPERBOARD INC R0003 75 180 BLR B&W PFI

- 22

- 0 #1

24001 001

- 0011 WESTVACO FINE PAPERS 1 500 1200 001

- 0011

- 3

- 0018

24001 001

- 0011 WESTVACO FINE PA PERS 2 440 1056 001

- 0011

- 3

- 0019

25009 1190138 GENERAL ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT 03 29 68 BOILER #3

- BABCOCK+WILCOX PPL

- 2897
DUAL FUEL EV99

- 3

25009 1190138 GENERAL ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT 05 24 58 TURBINE #1

- GE G5301 DUAL
FUEL BLDG 99

- 8

25017 1191844 MIT 02 132 317 TURBINE #1

- ABB GT10 DUEL FUEL(EXHAUST TO HRSG)

25025 1190507 TRIGEN BOSTON ENERGY 01 47 113 BOILER #1

- BABCOCK+WILCOX
HSB8477A DUAL FUEL

25025 1190507 TRIGEN BOSTON ENERGY 02 47 113 BOILER #2

- BABCOCK+WILCOX
JSB8477B DUAL FUEL

25025 1190507 TRIGEN BOSTON ENERGY 03 47 113 BOILER #3

- FOSTER+WHEELER SC DUAL
FUEL

25025 1190507 TRIGEN BOSTON ENERGY 04 47 113 BOILER #4

- BABCOCK+WILCOX
HSB8608A DUAL FUEL

36031 5154800008 INTERNATIONAL PAPER
TICONDEROG POWERH 227 545 EMISSION UNIT

36055 8261400205 KODAK PARK DIVISION U00015 1721 4130 EMISSION UNIT

36091 5412600007 INTERNATIONAL PAPER
HUDSON RIV UBOILR 124 298 EMISSION UNIT

42003 4200300022 SHENANGO INC. 005 13 31 BOILER #9, NATURAL GAS

42017 420170306 EXELON GENERATION
C O/FAIRLESS 043 2 5 POWER HOUSE BOILER NO. 3Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 2

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID Facility Name EU ID Ozone
Season
Allowance (tpy) Prorated
Annual
Emissions (tpy) Unit Description

42017 420170306 EXELON GENERATION
CO/FAIRLESS 044 73 175 POWER HOUSE BOILER NO. 4

42017 420170306 EXELON GENERATION
CO/FAIRLESS 045 61 146 POWER HOUSE BOILER NO. 5

42045 420450016 KIMBERLY CLARK PA
LLC/CHESTER 034 2 5

42045 420450220 FPL ENERGY MH50 LP/MARCUS
HOOK 031 82 197 COGENERATION UNIT

- ABB

TYPE B

42047 420470005 WEYERHAEUSER/JOHNSONBURG

MILL 040 85 204 BOILER #81

42047 420470005 WEYERHAEUSER/JOHNSONBURG

MILL 041 86 206 BOILER #82

42091 420910028 MERCK & CO/WEST POINT 039 101 242 COGEN II GAS TURBINE

42101 4210101551 SUNOCO CHEMICALS (FORMER
ALLIE 052 86 206 BL

- 703: BOILER #3

42131 421310009 PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER
PROD CO 035 203 482 WESTINGHOUSE 251B12

42133 421330016 PH GLATFELTER CO/SPRING
GROVE 034 146 350 #4 POWER BOILERFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 3

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table B

- 2 Cement Kilns Affected by the NOx SIP Call Phase I

FIPS SITE ID Facility Name EU ID Control
Factor Unit Description

24013 013

- 0012 LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT 39 25.00 013

- 0012

- 6

- 0256 0 13

- 0012

- 6

- 0256

24021 021

- 0013 ESSROC CEMENT 21 25.00 021

- 0013

- 6

- 0465 021

- 0013

- 6

- 0465

24021 021

- 0013 ESSROC CEMENT 22 25.00 021

- 0013

- 6

- 0466 021

- 0013

- 6

- 0466

24043 043

- 0008 INDEPENDENT CEMENT/ST.
LAWEREN 24 25.00 043

- 0008

- 6

- 0495 043

- 0008

- 6

- 0495

36001 4 012400001 LAFARGE BUILDING MATERIALS INC 041000 25.00 EMISSION UNIT

36039 4192600021 ST LAWRENCE CEMENT CORP

CATSKI U00K18 25.00 EMISSION UNIT

36113 5520500013 GLENS FALLS LEHIGH CEMENT 0UKILN 25.00 EMISSION UNIT

42011 420110039 LEHIGH CEMENT CO /EVA NSVILLE 121 70.00 PORTLAND CEMENT KILN #1

42011 420110039 LEHIGH CEMENT CO /EVANSVILLE 122 70.00 PORTLAND CEMENT KILN #2

42019 420190024 ARMSTRONG CEMENT & SUPPLY 101 16.00 NO.1 KILN

42019 420190024 ARMSTRONG CEMENT & SUPPLY 121 16.00 NO.2 KILN

4 2073 420730024 CEMEX INC/WAMPUM CEMENT PLT 226 12.50

42073 420730024 CEMEX INC/WAMPUM CEMENT PLT 227 0.00

42073 420730024 CEMEX INC/WAMPUM CEMENT PLT 228 12.70

42073 420730026 ESSROC/BESSEMER 501 8.00

42073 420730026 ESSROC/BESSEMER 502 8.00

42077 420770019 LAFARGE CORP/WHITEHALL PLT 101 12.28 K

- 2 KILN

42077 420770019 LAFARGE CORP/WHITEHALL PLT 114 100.00 K

- 3 KILN

42095 420950006 HERCULES CEMENT CO
LP/STOCKERT 102 6.88 NO. 1 CEMENT KILN

42095 420950006 HERCULES CEMENT CO
LP/STOCKERT 122 6.88 NO. 3 CEMENT KILN

42095 420950012 KEYSTONE PORTLAND
CEMENT/EAST 101 27.00 CEMENT KILN NO. 1

42095 420950012 KEYSTONE PORTLAND
CEMENT/EAST 102 27.00 CEMENT KILN NO. 2

42095 420950045 ESSROC/NAZARETH LOWER CEMENT 142 41.00

42095 420950045 ESS ROC/NAZARETH LOWER CEMENT 143 41.00

42095 420950127 ESSROC/NAZARETH CEMENT PLT 3 101 41.00

42095 420950127 ESSROC/NAZARETH CEMENT PLT 3 102 41.00

42095 420950127 ESSROC/NAZARETH CEMENT PLT 3 103 41.00

42095 420950127 ESSROC/NAZARETH CEMENT PLT 3 104 41.00

42133 421330060 LEHIGH CEMENT CO/YORK
OPERATIO N 200 27.00Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 4

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table B

- 3 Large IC Engines Affected by the NOx SIP Call Phase II

FIPS SITE ID Facility Name EU ID Control
Factor Unit Description

24027 027

- 0223 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE 1 80.00 027

- 0223

- 5

- 0054 boiler

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 101 80.00 ENGINE #1 (2000 BHP)

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 102 80.00 ENGINE #2 (2000 BHP)

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 103 80.00 ENGINE #3 (2000 BHP)

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 104 80.00 ENGINE #4 (2000 BHP)

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 105 80.00 ENGINE #5 (2000 BHP)

42005 420050015 DOMINION TRANS INC/SOUTH BEND 106 80.00 ENGINE #6 (2000 BHP)

4202 9 420290047 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS/FRAZER
ST 741 80.00 #11 I

- C GAS COMPRESSOR
ENGINE

42029 420290047 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS/FRAZER
ST 742 80.00 #12 I

- C GAS COMPRESSOR
ENGINE

42029 420290047 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS/FRAZER
ST 743 80.00 #13 I

- C GAS COMPRESSOR

E NGINE

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 101 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #1

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 101 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #1

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 101 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGIN E #1

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 101 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #1

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 102 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #2

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 102 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #2

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 102 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #2

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 102 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #2

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 103 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #3

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 103 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #3

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 103 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #3

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 103 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE # 3

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 104 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #4

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 104 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #4

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 104 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #4

42063 420630018 PA STATE SYS OF HIGHER ED/INDI 104 90.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #4

42105 421050005 TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO/313 P111 80.00 3,000HP KVT

- 512 ENGINE

42105 421050005 TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO/313 P112 80.00 2,000HP GMVH

- 10C ENGINE

4213 3 421330053 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS/STATION 1 036 80.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #4

42133 421330053 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS/STATION 1 037 80.00 COOPER

- BESSEMER ENGINE #5Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 5

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## B

- 4 NonEGU Control Factors for Post

- 2002 MACT Categories

SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

20100102 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100202 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100702 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100802 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ R eciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100902 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200102 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200104 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200202 N OX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200204 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200301 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200501 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Eng ines

20200702 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200706 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200902 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201001 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Interna l Combustion Engines

20201002 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201012 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201014 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201602 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Recip rocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201702 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20300101 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20300301 NOX 17.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

30400101 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400102 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400103 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400104 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400105 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR S econdary Aluminum Production

30400106 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400107 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400108 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400109 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminu m Production

30400110 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400111 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400112 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400113 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30 400114 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400115 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400116 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400117 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400118 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400120 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400121 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400130 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400131 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secon dary Aluminum Production

30400132 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400133 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400150 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400160 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Pr oduction

30400199 PM10

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30500301 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural ClayFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 6

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30500302 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500303 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500304 PM1 0

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500305 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500306 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500307 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500308 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500309 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500310 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500311 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500312 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30 500313 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500314 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500315 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500316 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500317 PM10

- PRI 45.100 J JJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500318 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500319 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500321 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500322 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structura l Clay

30500330 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500331 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500332 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500333 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500334 PM10

- PR I 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500335 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500340 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500342 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500350 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500351 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500355 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500360 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500361 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

305003 70 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500397 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500398 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500399 PM10

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30501601 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501602 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501603 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501604 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501605 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501606 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501607 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501608 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501609 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501610 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501611 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA L ime Manufacturing

30501612 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501613 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501614 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501615 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime ManufacturingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 7

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30501616 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Li me Manufacturing

30501617 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501618 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501619 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501620 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501621 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lim e Manufacturing

30501622 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501623 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501624 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501625 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501626 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501627 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501628 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501629 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501630 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501631 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501632 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501633 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501640 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501650 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501660 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime M anufacturing

30501699 PM10

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30400101 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400102 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400103 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400104 PM 25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400105 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400106 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400107 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400108 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RR R Secondary Aluminum Production

30400109 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400110 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400111 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400112 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Alum inum Production

30400113 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400114 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400115 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400116 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400117 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400118 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400120 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400121 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400130 PM25

- P RI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400131 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400132 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400133 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400150 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Se condary Aluminum Production

30400160 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30400199 PM25

- PRI 90.000 RRR Secondary Aluminum Production

30500301 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500302 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structur al Clay

30500303 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural ClayFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 8

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30500304 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500305 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500306 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500307 PM25

- P RI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500308 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500309 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500310 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500311 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick an d Structural Clay

30500312 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500313 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500314 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500315 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500 316 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500317 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500318 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500319 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500321 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJ J Brick and Structural Clay

30500322 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500330 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500331 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500332 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural C lay

30500333 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500334 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500335 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500340 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500342 PM25

- PRI 4 5.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500350 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500351 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500355 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500360 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and St ructural Clay

30500361 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500370 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500397 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500398 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30500399 PM25

- PRI 45.100 JJJJJ Brick and Structural Clay

30501601 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501602 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501603 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501604 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

305 01605 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501606 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501607 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501608 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501609 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

3050 1610 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501611 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501612 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501613 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501614 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501 615 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501616 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501617 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime ManufacturingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 9

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30501618 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501619 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

305016 20 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501621 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501622 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501623 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501624 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

3050162 5 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501626 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501627 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501628 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501629 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501630 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501631 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501632 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501633 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501640 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501650 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501660 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

30501699 PM25

- PRI 28.000 AAAAA Lime Manufacturing

20100101 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20100102 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combusti on Engines

20100201 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20100202 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100702 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20100802 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Comb ustion Engines

20100902 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200101 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20200102 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200103 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Tu rbines

20200104 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200201 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20200202 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200203 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20200204 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200209 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20200301 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200501 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engin es
20200702 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200706 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20200902 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201001 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201002 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201012 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201014 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20201602 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Recipro cating Internal Combustion Engines

20201702 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20300101 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

20300102 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20300109 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stat ionary Combustion Turbines

20300202 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20300203 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion TurbinesFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 10

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

20300209 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

20300301 VOC 40.000 ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion E ngines

20300701 VOC 0.250 YYYY Stationary Combustion Turbines

30100501 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100502 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100503 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100504 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100506 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100507 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100508 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100509 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30100510 VOC 26.100 YY Generic M ACT (Carbon Black)

30100599 VOC 26.100 YY Generic MACT (Carbon Black)

30101005 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemica l Production and Proc

30101012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101013 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101014 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101015 VOC 66.200 FFFF M isc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101023 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

301010 25 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101026 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101027 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101028 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Product ion and Proc

30101030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101033 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101034 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101035 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Orga nic Chemical Production and Proc

30101036 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101037 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101045 VOC 66 .200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101046 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101047 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101050 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and P roc
30101051 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101052 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101053 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101054 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemi cal Production and Proc

30101055 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101061 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101062 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101063 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101064 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101073 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101074 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

3010 1075 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101076 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101077 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and ProcFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 11

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30101080 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Produ ction and Proc

30101085 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101086 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101087 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101099 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Or ganic Chemical Production and Proc

30101827 VOC 55.700 OOO Polymers and Resins III

30101837 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30101880 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101881 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexib le Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101882 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101883 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101884 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101885 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101890 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101891 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101892 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam F abrication Ope

30101893 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101894 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30101899 VOC 67.400 MMMMM Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Ope

30103201 VOC 87.400 UUU Petrol eum Refineries

30103202 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103203 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103204 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103205 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103299 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30103301 V OC 64.820 MMM Pesticide Active Ingredient

30103311 VOC 64.820 MMM Pesticide Active Ingredient

30103312 VOC 64.820 MMM Pesticide Active Ingredient

30103399 VOC 64.820 MMM Pesticide Active Ingredient

30103901 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

3010390 2 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

30103903 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

30105001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105101 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105105 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105108 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105110 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105112 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105114 VO C 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105116 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105118 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105120 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production a nd Proc

30105122 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105124 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30105130 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic C hemical Production and Proc

30110003 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110004 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110005 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110080 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30110099 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30111103 VOC 43.900 QQQQQ Friction Products ManufacturingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 12

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30111199 VOC 43.900 QQQQQ Friction Products Manufacturing

30113001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30113003 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30113004 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30113005 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30113006 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30113007 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

30201901 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201902 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for V egetable Oil Produ

30201903 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201904 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201905 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201906 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solv ent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201907 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201908 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201909 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201911 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201912 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201913 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201914 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201915 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201916 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201917 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201918 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extra ction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201919 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201920 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201921 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201923 VOC 38.69 0 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201925 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201926 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201927 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201930 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201931 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201932 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201933 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201935 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201939 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201941 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201942 VOC 38.690 GGGG So lvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201945 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201949 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201950 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

3020196 0 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201997 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201998 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Produ

30201999 VOC 38.690 GGGG Solvent Extraction for Vegetabl e Oil Produ

30203404 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203405 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203406 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203407 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203410 VO C 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203415 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional YeastFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 13

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30203420 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203421 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203422 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufactur ing Nutritional Yeast

30203423 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203424 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203504 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203505 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

3 0203506 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203507 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203510 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203530 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203531 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203532 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203533 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203534 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203535 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritiona l Yeast

30203536 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30203540 VOC 12.500 CCCC Manufacturing Nutritional Yeast

30300303 VOC 50.000 CCCCC Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, Battery St

30300304 VOC 50.000 CCCCC Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, Bat tery St

30400301 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400302 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400303 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400304 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400305 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Stee l Foundries

30400310 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400314 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400315 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400316 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400317 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400318 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400319 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400320 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400321 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400322 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400325 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400330 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400331 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400332 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400333 VOC 40.000 EEEEE I ron and Steel Foundries

30400340 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400341 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400342 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400350 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400351 VOC 40.000 EEE EE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400352 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400353 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400354 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400355 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400356 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400357 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400358 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel FoundriesFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 14

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30400360 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400370 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400371 VOC 40 .000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400398 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30400399 VOC 40.000 EEEEE Iron and Steel Foundries

30500101 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500102 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphal t Roofing

30500103 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500104 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500105 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500106 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Ro ofing

30500107 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500108 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500110 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500111 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofin g
30500112 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500113 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500114 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500115 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

3 0500116 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500117 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500118 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500119 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500 120 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500121 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500130 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500131 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500132 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500133 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500134 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500135 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500140 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500141 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500142 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500143 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500144 VOC 28.0 00 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500145 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500146 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500147 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500150 VOC 28.000 L LLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500151 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500152 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500153 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500154 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500198 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30500199 VOC 28.000 LLLLL Asphalt Process and Asphalt Roofing

30501201 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501202 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501203 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501204 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501205 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501206 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Form ed Fiberglass Mat ProductionFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 15

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30501207 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501208 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501209 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501211 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed F iberglass Mat Production

30501212 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501213 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501214 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501215 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiber glass Mat Production

30501221 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501222 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501223 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30501224 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglas s Mat Production

30501299 VOC 74.000 HHHH Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

30600201 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries (FCC)

30600202 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries (FCC)

30600301 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries (FCC)

30600402 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries (FCC)

30600901 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600902 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600903 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600904 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600905 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refin eries

30600906 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30600999 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30601001 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30601101 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30601201 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30601301 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30601401 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30609901 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30609902 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30609903 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30609904 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30609905 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30610001 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30688801 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30688802 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30688803 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30688804 VOC 87.400 UUU P etroleum Refineries

30688805 VOC 87.400 UUU Petroleum Refineries

30700103 VOC 7.020 MM Comustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, and Sulf

30700104 VOC 7.020 MM Comustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, and Sulf

30700106 VOC 7.020 MM Comustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, a nd Sulf

30700110 VOC 7.020 MM Comustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, and Sulf

30700602 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700604 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700606 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Produ cts

30700607 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700608 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700610 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700611 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

307 00621 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood ProductsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 16

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30700625 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700626 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700628 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700629 VO C 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700630 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700631 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700632 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700635 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700640 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700651 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700655 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700661 VOC 41.200 DDDD Pl ywood and Composite Wood Products

30700701 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700702 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700703 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700704 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood an d Composite Wood Products

30700705 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700706 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700707 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700708 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Compos ite Wood Products

30700709 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700710 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700711 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700712 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700713 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700714 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700715 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700716 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Product s
30700717 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700718 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700720 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700725 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700 727 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700730 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700734 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700735 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700736 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700737 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700740 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700744 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700746 VOC 41.200 D DDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700747 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700750 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700752 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700753 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plyw ood and Composite Wood Products

30700756 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700757 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700760 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700762 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700763 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700766 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700767 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood ProductsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 17

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30700769 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composit e Wood Products

30700770 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700771 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700780 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700781 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood P roducts

30700783 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700785 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700788 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700789 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700790 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700791 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700792 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700793 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

3070079 8 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700799 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700921 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700923 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700925 VOC 41 .200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700927 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700931 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700932 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700933 VOC 41.200 DDD D Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700934 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700935 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700936 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700937 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywoo d and Composite Wood Products

30700939 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700940 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700950 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700960 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Co mposite Wood Products

30700971 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700980 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700981 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700982 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700983 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30700984 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701001 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701008 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Pro ducts

30701009 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701010 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701015 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701020 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

3 0701030 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701040 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701053 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701054 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701055 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701057 VOC 41.200 DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products

30701199 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

30800101 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800102 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tir e Manufacturing

30800103 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire ManufacturingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 18

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

30800104 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800105 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800106 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800107 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800108 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800109 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800110 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800111 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800112 VOC 47.600 XXXX Ru bber Tire Manufacturing

30800113 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800114 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800115 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800116 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800117 VOC 47.600 XXX X Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800120 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800121 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800122 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800123 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800124 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800125 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800126 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800127 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800128 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800129 VOC 47 .600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800130 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800131 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800132 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800133 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800197 VO C 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800198 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800199 VOC 47.600 XXXX Rubber Tire Manufacturing

30800701 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800702 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800703 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800704 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800705 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800720 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800721 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800722 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800723 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800724 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30800799 VOC 70.000 WWWW Reinforced Plastics

30801001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

31401001 VOC 43.900 QQQQQ Friction Products Manu facturing

31401002 VOC 43.900 QQQQQ Friction Products Manufacturing

31401501 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401503 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401504 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401510 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

314015 11 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401512 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401513 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat ManufacturingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 19

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

31401514 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401515 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401516 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufac turing

31401517 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401518 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401525 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401530 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401531 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401540 VOC 35.790 VVV V Boat Manufacturing

31401541 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401550 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401551 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401552 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401553 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401560 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401561 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401562 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401563 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401570 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufacturing

31401571 VOC 35.790 VVVV Boat Manufactur ing

31604001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

31604002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

31604003 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

32099997 VOC 38.900 TTTT Leather Finishing O perations

32099998 VOC 38.900 TTTT Leather Finishing Operations

32099999 VOC 38.900 TTTT Leather Finishing Operations

40201101 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201103 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201104 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201105 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201111 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201112 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201113 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201114 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201115 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201116 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201121 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Print ing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201122 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201197 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201198 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201199 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating , & Dyeing

40201201 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201210 VOC 60.170 OOOO Fabric Printing, Coating, & Dyeing

40201301 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201303 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201304 VOC 8 2.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201305 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201310 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201320 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201330 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201399 VOC 82.050 JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating

40201601 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface CoatingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 20

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

40201602 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201603 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201604 V OC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201605 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201606 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201607 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201608 V OC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201609 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201619 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201620 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201621 V OC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201622 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201623 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201624 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201625 V OC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201626 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201627 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201628 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201629 V OC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201630 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201631 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201632 VOC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201699 V OC 66.730 IIII Auto and Light Trucks Surface Coating

40201702 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201703 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201704 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201705 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201706 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201721 VOC 70.830 KK KK Metal Can

40201722 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201723 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201724 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201725 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201726 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201727 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201728 VOC 70.830 KKKK M etal Can

40201729 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201731 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201732 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201733 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201734 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201735 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201736 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201737 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201738 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201739 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201799 VOC 70.830 KKKK Metal Can

40201801 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201802 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201803 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal C oil

40201804 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201805 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal CoilFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 21

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

40201806 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201807 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40201899 VOC 53.060 SSSS Metal Coil

40202001 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202002 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202003 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202004 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202005 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202010 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202011 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202012 VOC 73.070 RRRR Met al Furniture

40202013 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202014 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202015 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202020 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202021 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202022 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal F urniture

40202023 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202024 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202025 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202031 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202032 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202033 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furni ture

40202034 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202035 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202036 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202037 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202038 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202039 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202099 VOC 73.070 RRRR Metal Furniture

40202101 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202103 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202104 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202105 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202106 VOC 74. 000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202107 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202108 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202109 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202110 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202111 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wo od Building Products

40202117 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202118 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202131 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202132 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202133 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202140 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202199 VOC 74.000 QQQQ Wood Building Products

40202201 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202202 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202203 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

402 02204 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202205 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts CoatingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 22

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

40202206 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202207 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202208 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202209 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202210 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202211 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202212 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202213 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202214 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Pa rts Coating

40202215 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202220 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202229 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202230 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202239 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

402 02240 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202249 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202250 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202259 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202270 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202280 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202299 VOC 77.000 PPPP Plastic Parts Coating

40202501 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202502 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202503 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202504 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202505 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202510 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202511 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202512 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202515 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202520 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202521 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202522 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

4020252 3 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202524 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202525 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202531 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202532 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Meta l Parts and Products

40202533 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202534 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202535 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202536 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

402025 37 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202542 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202543 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202544 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202545 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Met al Parts and Products

40202546 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202599 VOC 47.930 MMMM Misc. Metal Parts and Products

40202601 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202602 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202603 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating ManufacturingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 23

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

40202604 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202605 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202606 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40202607 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manuf acturing

40202699 VOC 66.200 HHHHH Misc. Coating Manufacturing

40388801 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

40388802 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

40388803 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

40388804 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

4038880 5 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

40399999 VOC 65.630 UUU Petroleum Refineries

50400101 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400102 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400103 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400104 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediat ion

50400150 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400151 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400201 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50400202 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410001 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410002 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410003 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410004 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410005 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410010 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410020 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410021 VOC 50.080 GGG GG Site Remediation

50410022 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410030 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410040 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410101 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410110 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410111 VOC 50 .080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410112 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410120 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410121 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410122 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410123 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

5041012 4 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410210 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410211 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410212 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410213 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410214 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410215 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410216 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410310 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410311 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410312 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410313 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Reme diation

50410314 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410321 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site RemediationFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 24

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

50410322 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410405 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410406 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410407 VOC 50.080 GGGGG S ite Remediation

50410408 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410409 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410420 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410510 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410511 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410512 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410513 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410514 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410520 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410521 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410522 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410523 VO C 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410524 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410525 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410530 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410531 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410532 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

504 10533 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410534 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410535 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410536 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410537 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410538 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediat ion

50410539 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410540 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410541 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410542 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410543 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410560 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410561 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410562 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410563 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410564 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410565 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410610 VOC 50.080 GGG GG Site Remediation

50410620 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410621 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410622 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410623 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410640 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410641 VOC 50 .080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410642 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410643 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410644 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410645 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410710 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

5041071 1 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410712 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site RemediationFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 25

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

50410720 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410721 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410722 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410723 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410724 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410725 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410726 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410740 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410760 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410761 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Reme diation

50410762 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410763 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410764 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410765 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410766 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50410780 VOC 50.080 GGGGG S ite Remediation

50480001 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50482001 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50482002 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50482599 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

50490004 VOC 50.080 GGGGG Site Remediation

62540001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540022 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540023 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540 024 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540025 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540040 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540041 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62540042 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose P roducts

62540050 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62580001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582002 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582501 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582502 VOC 62.900 UU UU Cellulose Products

62582503 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

62582599 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64130001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130 011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130101 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130110 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Produc tion and Proc

64130111 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130112 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130125 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130201 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Org anic Chemical Production and Proc

64130210 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and ProcFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 26

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

64130211 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64130225 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131001 VOC 6 6.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64131030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chem ical Production and Proc

64132010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132025 VOC 66.200 FFF F Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64132030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

641 33011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64133030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Prod uction and Proc

64180001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64182001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64182002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64182599 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. O rganic Chemical Production and Proc

64420001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420013 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Prod ucts

64420014 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420015 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420016 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420022 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420031 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420032 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420033 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420034 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420040 VO C 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420041 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64420042 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Product s
64430012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430013 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430014 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430015 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64430016 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose ProductsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 27

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

64430017 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cel lulose Products

64430030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431013 VOC 6 2.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431014 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431015 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431016 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431017 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64431030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450013 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450014 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellul ose Products

64450020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450022 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450031 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450032 VOC 62.9 00 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450033 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450034 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450035 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450036 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450040 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

644 50041 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450042 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450050 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450051 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450052 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450053 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450060 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450061 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64450062 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64520001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Ch emical Production and Proc

64520011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520022 VOC 66.200 F FFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520023 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520031 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

6 4520032 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64520041 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Pr oduction and Proc

64521010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and ProcFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 28

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

64521011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521023 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64521041 V OC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610031 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610032 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610041 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610050 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610101 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610110 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610111 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610112 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610120 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610121 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610122 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610130 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610131 VOC 66.200 FFFF Mis c. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610132 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610140 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610141 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610142 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610143 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610150 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610201 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Productio n and Proc

64610210 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610211 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610212 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610220 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organi c Chemical Production and Proc

64610221 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610222 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610230 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610231 VOC 66.2 00 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610232 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610240 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610241 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Pro c
64610242 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610250 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610301 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610310 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemica l Production and Proc

64610311 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and ProcFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 29

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

64610312 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610320 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610321 VOC 66.200 FFFF M isc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610322 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610330 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610331 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

646103 32 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610340 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64610350 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Product ion and Proc

64615010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Orga nic Chemical Production and Proc

64615021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615023 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64615030 VOC 66 .200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and P roc
64620013 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620016 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620017 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemi cal Production and Proc

64620018 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620021 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620026 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620027 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

6462 0030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620031 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620032 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620033 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Produ ction and Proc

64620034 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620035 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620036 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64620037 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Or ganic Chemical Production and Proc

64620038 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630016 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630026 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630035 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Che mical Production and Proc

64630040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and ProcFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 30

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

64630041 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630042 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630050 VOC 66.200 FF FF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630051 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630052 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630053 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64 630080 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630081 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630082 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64630083 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Pro duction and Proc

64631001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631012 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631016 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631025 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631026 VO C 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631050 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production a nd Proc

64631051 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631052 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631053 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631080 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic C hemical Production and Proc

64631081 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631082 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64631083 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632015 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632016 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632040 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical P roduction and Proc

64632041 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632042 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632050 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632051 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc . Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632052 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632053 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632080 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632081 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632082 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64632083 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64680001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64682001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64682002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64682501 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64682502 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64682599 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and ProcFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 31

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

64820010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64821001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64821010 VOC 66.20 0 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64822001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64822010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64823001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64823010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64824001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64824010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64880001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64882001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64882002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64882599 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

64920001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Ce llulose Products

64920010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920013 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920022 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920031 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920032 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920033 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64920034 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellu lose Products

64930021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930031 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930035 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930040 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930041 VOC 62. 900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930045 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64930050 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931010 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931011 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64 931012 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931020 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931021 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931022 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931030 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931031 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulos e Products

64931032 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931040 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931041 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64931050 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose ProductsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 32

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. SCC PLLTCODE CE_MACT SUBPART M ACT CATEG ORY DESCRIPTION

64980001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64982001 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64982002 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

64982599 VOC 62.900 UUUU Cellulose Products

65135001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

65140001 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140010 VOC 44.500 YY G eneric MACT (Cyanide)

65140011 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140012 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140013 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140014 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140015 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140016 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140017 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140018 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

65140030 VOC 44.500 YY Generic MACT (Cyanide)

68430001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Pro c
68430010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68430011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68430020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68430030 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemica l Production and Proc

68430031 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68430032 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445010 VOC 66.200 FFFF M isc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445013 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445020 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445022 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

684451 01 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68445201 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68510001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68510010 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Product ion and Proc

68510011 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68580001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68582001 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Proc

68582002 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Orga nic Chemical Production and Proc

68582599 VOC 66.200 FFFF Misc. Organic Chemical Production and ProcFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 33

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table B

- 5 NonEGU Source Shutdowns

FIPS SITE ID FACILTY NAME EU ID UNIT DESCRIPTION

10003 1000300021 SUNCO INC R M 001 BOILER #1

10003 1000300021 S UNCO INC R M 002 BOILER #2

10003 1000300021 SUNCO INC R M 003 BOILER #3

10003 1000300016 MOTIVA ENTERPRISES LLC 072 METHANOL PLT HTR 41

- H

- 1

10003 1000300004 WILMINGTON PIECE DYE CO ALL ALL

10003 1000300032 GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION ALL ALL

1000 3 1000300074 METACHEM PRODUCTS LLC ALL ALL

10003 1000300127 VPI FILM LLC ALL ALL

10003 1000300129 LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC ALL ALL

10003 1000300350 KANEKA DELAWARE CORPORATION ALL ALL

25001 1200202 PARTYLITE WORLDWIDE ALL ALL

25001 1200614 BOURNE LAN DFILL ALL ALL

25003 1170002 ADVANCED INFORMATION ALL ALL

25003 1170005 CATAMOUNT PELLET FUE ALL ALL

25003 1170048 SPRAGUE NORTH ADAMS ALL ALL

25003 1170056 BERKSHIRE GAS STOCKB ALL ALL

25003 1170078 MACDERMID GRAPHIC AR ALL ALL

25003 1170091 LANE CON STRUCTION CO ALL ALL

25005 1200009 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS ALL ALL

25005 1200031 CONDEA VISTA CO ALL ALL

25005 1200036 ELKAY REVERE CORP ALL ALL

25005 1200037 AEROVOX INCORPORATED ALL ALL

25005 1200065 ROSEMAR SILVER COMPA ALL ALL

25005 1200080 ATTLEBORO R EFINING C ALL ALL

25005 1200116 STEDRO TEXTILES ALL ALL

25005 1200138 CLIFTEX CORPORATION ALL ALL

25005 1200169 PAUL DEVER STATE SCH ALL ALL

25005 1200209 PHARMACY SERVICE COR ALL ALL

25005 1200216 BRISTOL COUNTY JAIL ALL ALL

25005 1200235 SEA WATCH INTERNATIO ALL ALL

25005 1200393 OLSONS GREENHOUSES ALL ALL

25005 1200468 AA WILL MATERIALS

- FR ALL ALL

25005 1200498 CRAPO HILL LANDFILL ALL ALL

25005 1200510 KREW INCORPORATED ALL ALL

25005 1200513 AEROVOX INCORPORATED ALL ALL

25005 1200542 LALLY CO LUMN CORP ALL ALL

25005 1200673 HOMELAND BUILDERS ALL ALL

25005 1200824 JUSTIN CLOTHING CO ALL ALL

25005 1200880 VELVET DRIVE TRANSMI ALL ALLFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 34

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID FACILTY NAME EU ID UNIT DESCRIPTION

25005 1192308 INTERSTATE MAT & RUB ALL ALL

25009 1210057 COASTAL METAL FINISH ALL ALL

25009 1210058 AMESBURY CHAIR ALL ALL

25009 1210075 HAMPSHIRE FABRICS ALL ALL

25009 1210099 WASTE MANAGEMENT HUN ALL ALL

25009 1210110 CUSTOM INDUSTRIES IN ALL ALL

25009 1210114 SAGAMORE INDUSTRIAL ALL ALL

25009 1210143 LABELS INC ALL ALL

25009 1210154 NEWARK ATLANTIC PAPE ALL ALL

25009 1210208 TEK COATING COMPANY ALL ALL

25009 1210209 NATIONAL NORTHEAST ALL ALL

25009 1210223 STARENSIER INC ALL ALL

25009 1210400 SANMINA CORPORATION ALL ALL

25009 1210401 COVANTA HAVERHILL IN ALL ALL

25009 1210404 TEKE FURNITURE RESTO A LL ALL

25009 1190756 PERMAIR LEATHERS INC ALL ALL

25009 1190842 SLB SNACKS INC ALL ALL

25009 1190983 SALEM OIL & GREASE C ALL ALL

25009 1191036 JCR ELECTRONICS ALL ALL

25009 1195900 LEPAGES INC ALL ALL

25013 0420008 DELUXE FINANCIAL ALL ALL

25013 04 20010 FRYE COPYSYSTEMS INC ALL ALL

25013 0420013 JAHN FOUNDRY CORPORA ALL ALL

25013 0420052 APW/WRIGHT LINE ALL ALL

25013 0420130 KODAK POLYCHROME GRA ALL ALL

25013 0420175 FIBERMARK DSI ALL ALL

25013 0420218 SPRINGFIELD PRINTING ALL ALL

25013 042025 2 KODAK POLYCHROME GRA ALL ALL

25013 0420528 NATIONAL METAL INDUS ALL ALL

25015 0420060 BERKSHIRE GAS HATFIE ALL ALL

25015 0420105 INDUSTRIAL POWER SER ALL ALL

25015 0420170 TECHALLOY COMPANY IN ALL ALL

25015 0420424 MAGNAT MACHINETECH I ALL ALL

2501 5 0420463 INDUSTRIAL PROP OF E ALL ALL

25015 0420540 GENERAL CABLE CORP ALL ALL

25015 0420614 REXAM IMAGE PRODUCTS ALL ALL

25017 1210013 MERRIMACK MAGNETICS ALL ALL

25017 1210050 MAJILITE MFG INC ALL ALL

25017 1210064 FINISH UNLIMITED INC ALL ALL

250 17 1190080 MASS BROKEN STONE CO ALL ALL

25017 1210127 USM CORPORATION ALL ALLFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 35

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID FACILTY NAME EU ID UNIT DESCRIPTION

25017 1210147 UMASS LOWELL

- RESIDEN ALL ALL

25017 1210182 JOAN FABRICS CORP ALL ALL

25017 1190203 SC WAKEFIELD 200 ALL ALL

25017 1190212 OLYMPUS SPECIALTY HO ALL ALL

25017 1 190258 ROYAL INSTITUTIONAL ALL ALL

25017 1210334 T&T INDUSTRIAL ALL ALL

25017 1190465 PRINTED CIRCUIT CORP ALL ALL

25017 1190611 GEORGE MEADE FOUNDRY ALL ALL

25017 1190734 NEW ENGLAND CONFECTI ALL ALL

25017 1180794 SCHOTT CML FIBEROPTI ALL ALL

25017 1190984 SUNGARD AVAILABILITY ALL ALL

25017 1191008 RAYTHEON SYSTEMS CO ALL ALL

25017 1191217 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CO ALL ALL

25017 1191267 AGFA DIVISION OF BAY ALL ALL

25017 1191351 MIT EDUCATIONAL FACI ALL ALL

25017 1191389 LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPA ALL ALL

25017 1191534 SWISSTRONICS INCORPO ALL ALL

25017 1191653 FOCAL INCORPORATED ALL ALL

25017 1191668 LEE PRODUCTS COMPANY ALL ALL

25017 1191735 TYCO ELECTRONICS COR ALL ALL

25017 1191897 GENZYME CORPORATION ALL ALL

25017 1194001 WF WOOD INC ALL ALL

250 17 1194010 RR DONNELLEY & SONS ALL ALL

25017 1214012 PERFORMANCE CORRUGAT ALL ALL

25021 1190246 SOUTHWOOD COMMUNITY ALL ALL

25021 1190313 INNOVATIVE MEMBRANE ALL ALL

25021 1180359 BEVILACQUA PAVING CO ALL ALL

25021 1200515 FOXBOROUGH REALTY AS ALL ALL

25021 1200616 PLAINVILLE GENERATIN ALL ALL

25021 1190670 RAYTHEON ELECTRONIC ALL ALL

25021 1190714 TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL ALL ALL

25021 1190962 NIDEC AMERICA CORPOR ALL ALL

25021 1191562 BARCLAY HOUSE THE ALL ALL

25021 1191726 MWRA QUINCY PS ALL ALL

2 5021 1192130 CURRY WOODWORKING IN ALL ALL

25021 1199000 MEDFIELD STATE HOSPI ALL ALL

25023 1200637 FRANKLIN FIXTURES IN ALL ALL

25023 1200698 CRANBERRY GRAPHICS I ALL ALL

25023 1192101 GTR FINISHING CORPOR ALL ALL

25023 1192109 ALGER CORPORATION TH AL L ALL

25023 1192210 IMPERIA CORPORATION ALL ALLFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Project ions February 28, 2007 Appendix B

– Non EGU Point Source Control Factors Page B

- 36

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID FACILTY NAME EU ID UNIT DESCRIPTION

25023 1199994 TEST

- RADIUS

- FITZGERA ALL ALL

25025 1190035 BOSTON WATER & SEWER ALL ALL

25025 1190057 NEPONSET RIVER VALLE ALL ALL

25025 1190101 UNIFIRST CORP ALL ALL

25025 1190357 DAMRELL EWER PARTNER AL L ALL

25025 1190478 WINTHROP COMMUNITY H ALL ALL

25025 1190649 ZAPCO READVILLE COGE ALL ALL

25025 1190808 PUBLIC HEALTH COMMUN ALL ALL

25025 1191551 BEACON CAPITAL PARTN ALL ALL

25025 1191566 NEW ENGLAND TRAWLER ALL ALL

25025 1191621 FEDERAL MOGUL FR ICTI ALL ALL

25025 1191662 EQUITY OFFICE ALL ALL

25025 1191956 CHANNEL CENTER:PARCE ALL ALL

25025 1195596 SYNTHON IND INCORPOR ALL ALL

25027 1180010 CANTERBURY TOWERS ALL ALL

25027 1180014 ER BUCK CHAIR COMPAN ALL ALL

25027 1180029 GENERAL ELECTRIC F IT ALL ALL

25027 1180091 ANGLO FABRICS COMPAN ALL ALL

25027 1180100 ZAPCO ENERGY TACTICS ALL ALL

25027 1180111 CINCINATTI MILACRON ALL ALL

25027 1180114 NEW ENGLAND PLATING ALL ALL

25027 1180129 GF WRIGHT STEEL & WI ALL ALL

25027 1180132 STANDARDFOUN DRY ALL ALL

25027 1180174 WORCESTER TOOL & STA ALL ALL

25027 1180203 WORCESTER COUNTY HOS ALL ALL

25027 1180244 HI TECH METALS & FIN ALL ALL

25027 1180340 GHM INDUSTRIES INC ALL ALL

25027 1180353 ADVANCED MICROSENSOR ALL ALL

25027 1180355 NEWARK AMER ICA ALL ALL

25027 1180373 ZYGO TERAOPTIX ALL ALL

25027 1180389 ETHAN ALLEN

- DUDLEY ALL ALL

25027 1180439 INLAND PAPERBOARD & ALL ALL

25027 1180484 NELMOR COMPANY ALL ALL

25027 1180518 JAMESBURY INCORPORAT ALL ALL

25027 1180556 M&H TIRE CO INC ALL ALL

25027 1180568 CROFT CORPORATION ALL ALL

25027 1180796 LINCOLN PLAZA CENTER ALL ALL

25027 1180994 COZ PLASTICS INC ALL ALL

25027 1181045 WORCESTER TAPER PIN ALL ALL

33011 3301100093 BATESVILLE MANUFACTURING ALL ALL

33015 3301500058 VENTURE SEABROOK AL L ALLFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix C

– Area Source Growth Factors Page C

- 1

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# Appendix C

– Area Source Growth Factors

Table C

- 1 Area Source Growth Factors by S C C Code

See Electronic File: MANE

- VU

_ Area _gf_scc.xls

This table contains records with area source growth factors by county and SCC. The format for the

tables is as follows:

Column A

– County FIPS code

Column B

– Source Classification Code (SCC)

Column C

– EGAS_02_09 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column D

– AEO5_02_09 this is the DOE AEO 2005 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Colu mn E

– ST_02_09 this is the state

- supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2009

Column F

– GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2009 (it

is the state

- supplied factor, if available; if no state

- supplied factor, then it is the AEO2005
factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column G

– EGAS_02_12 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column H

– AEO5_02_12 this is the DOE AEO 2005 factor for projecting from 2002 to 20 12

Column I

– ST_02_12 this is the state

- supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2012

Column J

– GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2012 (it

is the state

- supplied factor, if available; if no state

- supplied facto r, then it is the AEO2005
factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column K

– EGAS_02_18 this is the EGAS 5.0 factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018

Column J

– AEO5_02_18 this is the DOE AEO 2005 factor for projecting from 200 2 to 2018

Column M

– ST_02_18 this is the state

- supplied factor for projecting from 2002 to 2018

Column N

– GF_02_09 this is the final factor actually used for projecting from 2002 to 2012 (it

is the state

- supplied factor, if available; if no state

- supplie d factor, then it is the AEO2005
factor; if no AEO2005 factor, then it is the default EGAS 5.0 factor)

Column O

– SCC descriptionFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 1

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

# Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors

Table D

- 1 Area Source Control Factors for 2001 OTC VOC Model Rules

FIPSST SCC PLLT CODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

AIM Coating s

09 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings;Surface Coating

09 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coa ting
10 2401002000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings

- Solvent

- based;Surface Coating

10 2401003000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings

- Water

- based;Surface Coating

10 240100800 0 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
10 2401102000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial Maintenance Coatings

- Solve;Surface Coating

10 2401103000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial Maintenance Coatings

- Water;Surface Coating

11 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings;Surface Coating

11 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;S urface Coating
11 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

11 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose Coatings;Surface Coating

23 2401001000 V OC 29.50 29.50 29.50 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings;Surface Coating

23 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
23 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Indus trial Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

23 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose Coatings;Surface Coating

24 2401002000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings

- Solvent

- bas ed;Surface Coating

24 2401003000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings

- Water

- based;Surface Coating

24 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
24 2401008999 VOC 31 .00 31.00 31.00 Solvents: NEC;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
24 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

24 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Specia l Purpose Coatings;Surface Coating

25 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings;Surface Coating

25 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
25 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial Maintenance Coatings;Surface CoatingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 2

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPSST SCC PLLT CODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

25 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose Coatings;Surface Coating

33 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings;Surface Coating

33 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
33 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

33 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose Coatings;Surface Coating

34 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings;Surface Coating

34 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
34 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

34 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Speci al Purpose Coatings;Surface Coating

36 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings;Surface Coating

36 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
42 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings;Surface Coating

42 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
42 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industr ial Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

42 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose Coatings;Surface Coating

44 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings;Surface Coating

44 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
50 2401001000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Architectural Coatings;Surface Coating

50 2401008000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All So lvent Types;Traffic Markings;Surface Coating
50 2401100000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial Maintenance Coatings;Surface Coating

50 2401200000 VOC 31.00 31.00 31.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Other Special Purpose Coatings;Su rface Coating

Consumer Products

09 2465000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Products/Processes;Miscellaneous Non

industrial: Consumer
10 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Personal Care Products;Misc ellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

10 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and CommercFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 3

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPSST SCC PLLT CODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

10 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All A utomotive Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Non

industrial: Consumer and Commerc

10 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and Related Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

10 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and Sealants;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

10 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Co mmerc

10 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous Products (Not Otherwise Covered);Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc
11 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Personal Care
Prod ucts;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

11 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

11 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Ty pes;All Automotive Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Non

industrial: Consumer and Commerc

11 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and Related Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

11 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and Sealants;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

11 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consum er and Commerc

11 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous Products (Not Otherwise Covered);Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc
23 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Personal Care Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

23 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

23 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All S olvent Types;All Automotive Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Non

industrial: Consumer and Commerc

23 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and Related Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

23 24 60600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and Sealants;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and CommercFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 4

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPSST SCC PLLT CODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

23 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industria l:
Consumer and Commerc

23 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous Products (Not Otherwise Covered);Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc
24 2465000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Products/Processes;Miscellaneous Non

industrial: Consumer
25 2460000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Processes;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc
33 2460000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Processes;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc
34 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Personal Care Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

34 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

34 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Automotive Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Non

industrial: Consumer and Commerc

34 2460500000 V OC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and Related Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

34 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and Sealants;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

34 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

34 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous Products (Not Otherwise Covered);Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc
34 2465000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Products/Processes;Miscellaneous Non

industrial: Consumer
36 2460000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Processes;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc
42 2465000000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Products/Processes;Miscellaneous Non

industrial: Consumer
44 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solven t Types;All Personal Care Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

44 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

44 2460400000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Automotive Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Non

industrial: Consumer and CommercFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 5

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPSST SCC PLLT CODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

44 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and Related Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consum er and Commerc

44 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and Sealants;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

44 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related Products;Miscel laneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

44 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous Products (Not Otherwise Covered);Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc
50 2460100000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: A ll Solvent Types;All Personal Care Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

50 2460200000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Household Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

50 2460400000 VOC 14. 20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Automotive Aftermarket Products;Miscellaneous Non

industrial: Consumer and Commerc

50 2460500000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Coatings and Related Products;Miscellaneous Non

- industria l:
Consumer and Commerc

50 2460600000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All Adhesives and Sealants;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

50 2460800000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;All FIFRA Related
Produc ts;Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

50 2460900000 VOC 14.20 14.20 14.20 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous Products (Not Otherwise Covered);Miscellaneous Non

- industrial:
Consumer and Commerc

Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishin g

09 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

10 2401005500 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Surface Preparation Solvents;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

10 2401005600 VOC 38.00 38.00 3 8.00 Primers;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating
10 2401005700 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Top Coats;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating
10 2401005800 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Clean

- up Solvents;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

11 2 401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

23 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

2 4 2401005000 VOC 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 Total: A ll Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface CoatingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 6

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPSST SCC PLLT CODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

2 5 2401005000 VOC 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

33 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC
7532 ;Surface Coating

34 2401005000 VOC 19.00 19.00 19.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

36 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

42 2401005000 VOC 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

44 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

50 2401005000 VOC 38.00 38.00 38.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Coating

Solvent Cleaning Operations

09 2415000000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Processes/All Industries;Degreasing

23 2415000000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Processes/All Industries;Degreasing

23 2415030000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Electronic and Other Elec. (SIC 36): All Processes;Degreasing

23 2415045000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous Manufacturing (SIC 39): All Processe;Degreasing
23 2415065000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Auto Repair Services (SIC 75): All Processes;Degreasing

23 2415300000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Industries: Cold Cleaning;Degreasing

2 5 2415 0 00000 VOC 7 .00 7 .00 7 .00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Industries: Cold Cleaning;Degreasing

33 2415 0 00000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Industries: Cold Cleaning;Degreasing

3 4 2415000000 VOC 17 .00 17 .00 17 .00 Total: All Solve nt Types;All Processes/All Industries;Degreasing

36 2415020000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Fabricated Metal Products (SIC 34): All Processes;Degreasing

36 2415025000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Industrial Machi nery and Equipment (SIC 35): All P;Degreasing

36 2415035000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Transportation Equipment (SIC 37): All Processes;Degreasing

36 2415045000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous
Manufa cturing (SIC 39): All Processe;Degreasing
36 2415055000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Automotive Dealers (SIC 55): All Processes;Degreasing

36 2415060000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;Miscellaneous Repair
Services (SIC 76): All Proces;Degreasing

44 2415000000 VOC 66.00 66.00 66.00 Total: All Solvent Types;All Processes/All Industries;DegreasingFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 7

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPSST SCC PLLT CODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

Portable Fuel Containers

09 2501060300 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential &

Co m;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

10 2501011010 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Vapor Losses;Portable Containers:
Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

10 2501011011 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers:

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

10 2501011012 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers:
Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

10 2501011015 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Spillage;Portable Containers:

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Stora ge

10 2501011016 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers:

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

10 2501012010 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Vapor Losses;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

10 2501012011 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

10 2501012012 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers:
Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

10 2501012015 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Spil lage;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

10 2501012016 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

11 2501011011 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Permeation;Portable Contain ers: Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

11 2501011012 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers:

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

11 2501011016 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers:
Residential;Petr oleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

11 2501012011 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

11 2501012012 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Pro ductFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 8

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPSST SCC PLLT CODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description
Storage

11 2501012016 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

23 2501060300 VOC 41.3 63.8 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential &
Com;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

24 250 1011011 VOC 48.8 71.3 75 .0 Permeation;Portable Containers:

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

24 2501011012 VOC 48.8 71.3 75 .0 Diurnal;Portable Containers:

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

24 2501011016 VOC 48.8 71.3 75 .0 Transport;Portable Containers:

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

24 2501012011 VOC 48.8 71.3 75 .0 Permeation;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

24 2501012012 VOC 48.8 71.3 75 .0 Diurnal;Portab le Containers:
Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

24 2501012016 VOC 48.8 71.3 75 .0 Transport;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

25 2501011000 VOC 18.8 41.3 75.0 ;;

25 2501012000 VOC 18.8 41.3 75.0 ; ;

33 2501060300 VOC 26.3 48.8 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential &
Com;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

34 2501000120 VOC 33.8 56.3 75 .0 Gasoline;All Storage Types: Breathing
Loss;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

36 2501011011 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers:
Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

36 2501011012 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containers:

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

36 2501011016 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Trans port;Portable Containers:

Residential;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

36 2501012011 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Permeation;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

36 2501012012 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Diurnal;Portable Containe rs: Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
StorageFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 9

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPSST SCC PLLT CODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

36 2501012016 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Transport;Portable Containers:

Commercial;Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Storage

42 2501060300 VOC 48.8 71.3 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential &

Com;Petr oleum and Petroleum Product Storage

44 2501060300 VOC 18.8 41.3 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential &
Com;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage

50 2501060300 VOC 18.8 41.3 75.0 Total;Portable Containers: Residential &
Com;Petroleum and Petroleu m Product StorageFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 10

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table D

- 2 Area Source Control Factors for On

- Board Vapor Recovery

FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

09001 2501060101 VOC 23.81 28.57 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09001 2501060102 VOC 23.81 28.57 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09003 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09003 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09005 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09005 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled; Gasoline Service
Stations
09007 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09007 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09009 2501060 101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09009 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09011 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Di splacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09011 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09013 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Se rvice
Stations
09013 2501060102 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09015 2501060101 VOC 23.81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
09015 2501060102 VOC 23. 81 33.33 38.10 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
10001 2501060100 VOC 40.54 48.65 56.76 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

10003 2501060100 VOC 40.54 48.65 56.76 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

10005 2501060100 VOC 40.54 48.65 56.76 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

11001 2501060100 VOC 40.54 48.65 56.76 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23001 2501060100 VOC 53.68 67.65 79.41 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23003 250 1060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23005 2501060100 VOC 28.57 33.33 42.86 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23007 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23009 2501060 100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23011 2501060100 VOC 53.68 67.65 79.41 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23013 2501060100 VOC 53.68 67.65 79.41 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23015 2501060100 VOC 53.68 67.65 79.41 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23017 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23019 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23021 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23023 2501060100 VOC 28.57 33.33 42.86 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23025 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23027 2501060100 VOC 53.8 0 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23029 2501060100 VOC 53.80 68.35 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

23031 2501060100 VOC 28.57 33.33 42.86 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24001 2501060100 VOC 54.24 6 8.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service StationsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 11

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

24003 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24005 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24009 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24011 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24013 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24015 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43 .48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24017 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24019 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24021 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24023 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24025 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24027 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Sta ge 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24029 2501060100 VOC 53.53 68.24 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24031 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24033 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2 : Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24035 2501060100 VOC 53.53 68.24 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24037 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24039 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: To tal;Gasoline Service Stations

24041 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24043 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24045 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total; Gasoline Service Stations

24047 2501060100 VOC 54.24 68.36 80.23 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

24510 2501060100 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

25001 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displaceme nt Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25003 2501060102 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25005 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Statio ns 25007 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25009 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25011 2501060102 VOC 38.24 50.00 55. 88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25013 2501060102 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25015 2501060102 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled; Gasoline Service
Stations
25017 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25019 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25021 250106010 2 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25023 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25025 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displa cement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
25027 2501060102 VOC 38.24 47.06 55.88 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
33001 2501060100 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33003 250106010 0 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33005 2501060100 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33007 2501060100 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service StationsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 12

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

33009 2501060100 VO C 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33011 2501060100 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33013 2501060100 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33015 2501060100 VOC 38 .24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33017 2501060100 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

33019 2501060100 VOC 53.75 68.13 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34001 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34003 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34005 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34007 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47. 22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34009 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34011 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34013 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34015 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34017 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34019 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.3 3 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34021 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34023 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34025 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 S tage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34027 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34029 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34031 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34033 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34035 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34037 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34039 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

34041 2501060100 VOC 38.89 47.22 58.33 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36001 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Tota l;Gasoline Service Stations

36003 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36005 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36007 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Ga soline Service Stations

36009 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36011 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36013 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoli ne Service Stations

36015 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36017 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36019 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline S ervice Stations

36021 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36023 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36025 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Servi ce Stations

36027 2501060100 VOC 53.80 67.72 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36029 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36031 2501060100 VOC 53.57 67.86 79.76 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service S tations

36033 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36035 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36037 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stati ons
36039 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36041 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36043 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36045 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service StationsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 13

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

36047 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36049 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

360 51 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36053 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36055 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36057 2 501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36059 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36061 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36063 25010 60100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36065 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36067 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36069 250106010 0 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36071 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36073 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36075 2501060100 VO C 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36077 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36079 2501060100 VOC 53.80 67.72 79.75 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36081 2501060100 VOC 34 .48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36083 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36085 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36087 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36089 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36091 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36093 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68. 57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36095 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36097 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36099 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36101 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36103 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36105 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.0 0 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36107 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36109 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36111 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 S tage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36113 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36115 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36117 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36119 2501060100 VOC 34.48 41.38 51.72 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36121 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

36123 2501060100 VOC 54.29 68.57 80.00 Stage 2: Total;Gasoline Service Stations

42001 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42003 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42005 2 501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 39.13 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42007 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42009 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2 : Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42011 2501060101 VOC 26.09 34.78 39.13 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42013 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasol ine ServiceFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 14

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

Stations

42015 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42017 2501060102 VOC 30.43 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42019 2501060102 V OC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42021 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42023 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displac ement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42025 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42027 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Servi ce Stations
42029 2501060102 VOC 30.43 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42031 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42033 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42035 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42037 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement L oss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42039 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42041 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stat ions
42043 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42045 2501060102 VOC 30.43 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42047 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42049 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42051 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Con trolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42053 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42055 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
420 57 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42059 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42061 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42063 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42065 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontroll ed;Gasoline Service
Stations
42067 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42069 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42071 25 01060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42073 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline ServiceFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 15

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

Stations

42075 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stag e 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42077 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42079 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Ga soline Service
Stations
42081 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42083 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42085 2501060 101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42087 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42089 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42091 2501060102 VOC 30.43 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42093 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42095 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42097 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42099 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42101 2501060102 VOC 30.43 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42103 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacem ent Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42105 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42107 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42109 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42111 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42113 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42115 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42117 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement L oss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42119 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42121 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stat ions
42123 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42125 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42127 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42129 2501060102 VOC 26.09 34.78 43.48 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42131 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncon trolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
42133 2501060101 VOC 53.98 68.75 80.11 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline ServiceFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 16

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

Stations

44001 2501060000 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Total: All Gasoline/All Processes;Gasoline Service Stations

44003 250 1060000 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Total: All Gasoline/All Processes;Gasoline Service Stations

44005 2501060000 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Total: All Gasoline/All Processes;Gasoline Service Stations

44007 2501060000 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Total: All Gasoli ne/All Processes;Gasoline Service Stations

44009 2501060000 VOC 38.24 50.00 55.88 Total: All Gasoline/All Processes;Gasoline Service Stations

50001 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50001 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50001 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50003 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacemen t Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50003 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50003 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50005 250106010 1 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50005 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50005 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spil lage;Gasoline Service Stations

50007 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50007 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50007 25 01060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50009 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50009 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss /Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50009 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50011 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50011 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50011 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50013 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;G asoline Service
Stations
50013 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50013 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50015 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 5 7.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50015 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50015 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50017 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50017 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50017 2501060103 VOC 37.14 4 8.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50019 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50019 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50019 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50021 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline ServiceFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 17

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SCC PLLTCODE CE _2009 CE _2012 CE _2018 SCC Description

Stations

50021 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50021 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50023 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stati ons 50023 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50023 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50025 2501060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displa cement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50025 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50025 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service Stations

50027 2501 060101 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50027 2501060102 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled;Gasoline Service
Stations
50027 2501060103 VOC 37.14 48.57 57.14 Stage 2: Spillage;Gasoline Service StationsFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix D

– Area Source Control Factors Page D

- 18

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table D

- 3 Area Source Growth/ Control Factors for Residential Wood Combustion

Growth and Control Factor

SCC SCC Description Assumptions 2002

- 2009 2002

- 2012 2002

- 2018

2104008000 Total: Woodstoves and Fireplaces 1

- 0.01056*(Year

- 2002) (Assumes 19.4% fireplaces
71.6%old woodstoves 9.1%new woodstoves) 0.926 0.894 0.831

2104008001 Fireplaces: General Increase 1%/yr: 1 + 0.01*(Year

- 2002) 1.070 1.100 1.160

2104008002 Fireplaces: Insert; non

- EPA
certified Decrease 2% /yr: 1

- 0.02*(Year

- 2002) 0.860 0.800 0.680

2104008003 Fireplaces: Insert; EPA certified;

non

- catalytic Increase 2%/yr: 1 + 0.02*(Year

- 2002) 1.140 1.200 1.320

2104008004 Fireplaces: Insert; EPA certified; catalytic Increase 2%/yr (same as 2104008003) 1.1 40 1.200 1.320

2104008010 Woodstoves: General Decrease 2%/yr (same as 2104008002) 0.860 0.800 0.680

2104008030 Catalytic Woodstoves: General Increase 2%/yr (same as 2104008003) 1.140 1.200 1.320

2104008050 Non

- catalytic Woodstoves: EPA
certified Increas e 2%/yr (same as 2104008003) 1.140 1.200 1.320

2104008051 Non

- catalytic Woodstoves: Non

EPA certified Decrease 2%/yr (same as 2104008002) 0.860 0.800 0.680

2104008052 Non

- catalytic Woodstoves: Low Emitting Increase 2%/yr (same as 2104008003) 1.140 1.200 1.320

2104008053 Non

- catalytic Woodstoves: Pellet
Fired Increase 2%/yr (same as 2104008003) 1.140 1.200 1.320Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 1

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table E

- 1 NonEGU BOTW Control Factors for Adhesives and Sealants Application,
Asphalt Production Plants, Cement Kilns, and Glass/Fiberglass F urnaces

FIPS SITE ID EU ID PROCESS
ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018
Control Measure: Adhesives and Sealants Application

09003 6484 R0131 01 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

09003 6484 R0132 01 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

09015 0647 P0085 01 402 00701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10001 1000100004 003 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10001 1000100004 005 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10001 1000100004 005 3 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10001 1000100004 005 4 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10001 1 000100004 005 5 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10003 1000300365 002 2 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10003 1000300365 002 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

23001 2300100076 003 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24003 003

- 0250 232 01F232 40200701 VOC 64.4 0 64.40 64.40

24003 003

- 0250 232 01S232 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24005 005

- 2407 17 01F17 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24005 005

- 2407 17 01S17 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025

- 0006 45 01F45 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025

- 0006 45 01S45 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025

- 0423 5 01F5 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025

- 0423 5 01S5 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025

- 0423 6 01F6 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025

- 0423 6 01S6 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025

- 0423 7 01F7 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24025 025

- 0423 7 01S7 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24045 045

- 0082 12 01F12 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24045 045

- 0082 12 01S12 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200077 12 0108 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200100 23 0111 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200100 26 0114 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200100 28 0116 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200101 08 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200101 09 0108 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200101 10 0109 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200101 11 0110 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200101 12 0111 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200183 07 0203 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1 200388 04 0104 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200388 05 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200388 05 0205 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200509 04 0104 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200585 02 0102 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200673 07 0107 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 2

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID EU ID PROCESS
ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

25005 1200707 08 0106 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25005 1200851 11 0110 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1190683 03 0103 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1190690 09 0108 40200710 VO C 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210026 15 0115 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210046 01 0101 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210083 05 0104 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210093 09 0209 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210110 01 01 01 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210212 30 0321 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210212 30 0721 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210212 32 0322 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210212 32 0622 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210212 32 0922 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210276 03 0102 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210332 01 0101 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210332 02 0102 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1210332 03 0103 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.4 0 64.40

25009 1210341 10 0110 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1211013 07 0105 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1211013 08 0306 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1211013 33 0331 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1211013 72 0259 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25009 1211013 89 0253 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420145 16 0112 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420213 01 0201 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420260 02 0102 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420265 06 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420561 01 0101 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420798 05 0105 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25013 0420821 10 0106 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25015 0420558 01 0101 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

250 17 1180795 02 0102 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 03 0103 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 04 0104 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 05 0105 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 06 0106 40200706 VOC 64.40 64 .40 64.40

25017 1180795 07 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 08 0108 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1180795 09 0109 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190355 05 0101 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 04 0104 4020070 1 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 08 0106 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 11 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 20 0110 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 24 0111 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 2 8 0112 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 3

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID EU ID PROCESS
ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

25017 1190424 32 0213 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190424 37 0117 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190429 06 0106 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190560 02 0101 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

2 5017 1190560 23 0106 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190585 08 0104 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190585 17 0106 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190692 09 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190692 10 0108 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190692 11 0108 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190953 04 0104 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190999 11 0111 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190999 11 0211 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1190999 13 0313 40200 710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191104 03 0103 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191192 05 0104 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191296 26 0116 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191296 27 0117 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191471 04 0103 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191564 08 0108 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191844 53 0135 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1191844 53 0335 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1192051 12 0107 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1192051 26 0115 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210036 03 0103 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210036 05 0104 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210036 07 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 01 0101 40200701 VOC 64.4 0 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 02 0102 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 03 0103 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 04 0104 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 04 0204 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 05 0105 402 00701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 05 0205 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 06 0106 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 06 0206 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210373 09 0109 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 12103 73 10 0110 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25017 1210912 02 0202 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1190319 04 0103 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1190319 11 0111 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1190569 23 0215 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.4 0

25021 1192106 03 0103 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1192121 07 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1192131 03 0103 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1192491 07 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1192491 08 0108 40200701 VOC 64 .40 64.40 64.40Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 4

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID EU ID PROCESS
ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

25021 1200125 55 0146 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1200125 56 0147 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1200127 10 0209 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1200228 04 0203 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25021 1200452 04 0102 4 0200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 11 0107 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 12 0108 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 19 0109 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 23 0109 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 119 2198 25 0109 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192198 26 0109 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192203 01 0101 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192237 08 0102 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1192436 09 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64 .40

25023 1200177 05 0105 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1200637 04 0104 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25023 1200637 07 0105 40200707 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25025 1191397 05 0106 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25025 1191397 06 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180025 01 0301 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180115 17 0209 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180115 25 0311 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180115 36 0117 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180115 39 0118 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180115 77 0251 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180225 04 0104 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180265 05 0205 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180310 03 0203 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1 180310 03 0303 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180505 07 0107 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180505 23 0123 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180998 27 0111 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1180998 30 0113 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1200856 12 0110 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25027 1200856 13 0111 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33011 3301100076 004 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33011 3301100076 005 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33011 3301100076 009 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33017 3301700010 001 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33017 3301700010 002 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36063 9290900018 ADHES1 HM1FP 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36069 8329900028 000005 WABFP 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36103 1473000001 EI0001 E10EI 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36103 1473000001 U00002 103FP 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36115 5533000016 U00011 SL2FP 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36117 8543600007 1MLDRB SC3FP 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36117 8543600007 2KLZRS SC2FP 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 5

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID EU ID PROCESS
ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

42001 420010009 103 1 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42013 420130480 101 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42017 420171041 101 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190029 104 1 40200701 VOC 64. 40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190029 105 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 3 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 4 40 200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 5 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42019 420190090 102 6 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42035 420350429 P105 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42035 420350429 P106 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42039 42 0390013 106 1 40200707 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42039 420390014 102 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42039 420390014 103 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42039 420390014 104 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42039 420390014 105 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 6 4.40

42045 420450954 121 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42055 420550022 100 1 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42055 420550022 101 1 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610016 104 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610016 105 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 101 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 101 4 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 101 6 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 102 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 102 4 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 102 6 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 103 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42061 420610032 103 4 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42069 420690023 107 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42069 420690023 108 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42071 420710802 102 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42071 420710804 102 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 101 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 101 2 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 102 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 102 2 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 103 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 104 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42077 420770071 105 1 40200710 V OC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42081 420810039 113 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42081 420810559 P104 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42091 420910826 002 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42097 420970001 105 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42097 420970001 2 01 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 6

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID EU ID PROCESS
ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

42097 420970001 202 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42097 420970034 104 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42097 420970034 105A 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210101591 004 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

4 2101 4210102051 005 10 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 005 11 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 005 12 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 006 5 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 007 6 40200712 VO C 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 008 14 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210102051 009 7 40200712 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42101 4210103217 010 2 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42109 421090001 113 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42109 421090001 140 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42119 421190477 P101 1 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42129 421290071 105 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42129 421290311 101 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42133 421330034 103 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42133 421330055 101 1 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42133 421330055 101 2 40200706 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44003 AIR1438 8 8 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44007 AIR1859 2 2 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44007 AIR3850 1 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44007 AIR537 2 2 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44009 AIR594 7 7 40200710 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

50005 9 4 1 40200701 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40
Control Measure: Asphalt Production Plants

34001 70003 U101 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70003 U101 OS2 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70003 U12 OS0 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70003 U13 OS0 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70003 U6 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70015 U401 OS1601 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70015 U 401 OS2101 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34001 70015 U401 OS401 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34007 50373 U11 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34007 50373 U6 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34009 73014 U9 OS3 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34009 730 14 U9 OS7 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34013 05005 U2 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34015 55261 U4 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34017 11171 U2 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34021 60031 U6 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34023 15129 U7 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34025 20022 U1 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34025 20023 U2 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34025 20025 U26 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 7

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID EU ID PROCESS
ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

34025 20025 U3 OS2 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34027 25009 U13 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34027 25009 U2 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34027 25268 U100 OS101 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34027 25268 U1601 OS1601 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34027 25268 U1601 OS1602 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 780 10 U1500 OS1501 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78010 U1500 OS1502 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78010 U1601 OS1601 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78010 U900 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78012 U101 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34029 78014 U2 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30005 U100 OS113 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30005 U2300 OS2301 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30005 U2300 OS2332 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30085 U100 OS201 30500207 N OX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30085 U100 OS901 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34031 30085 U100 OS903 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 35014 U100 OS113 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 35014 U100 OS2301 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 36009 U1000 OS1201 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 36009 U1000 OS1202 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 36009 U1000 OS1301 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34035 36009 U1000 OS1401 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

34037 83008 U4 OS1 30500207 NOX 0.00 35.00 35.00

36081 2630200138 D00001 P01FP 30500251 NOX 35.00 35.00 35.00

36085 2640300031 3ADRYR 302FP 30500251 NOX 35.00 35.00 35.00

36119 3550800247 1MIXER 001FP 30500205 NOX 35.00 35.00 35.00

Control Measure: Cement Kilns

23013 2301300028 001 1 30500706 NOX 60. 00 60.00 60.00

24013 013

- 0012 39 01S39 30500606 NOX 46.67 46.67 46.67

24021 021

- 0013 21 01S21 30500706 NOX 46.67 46.67 46.67

24021 021

- 0013 22 01S22 30500706 NOX 46.67 46.67 46.67

24043 043

- 0008 24 01S24 30500606 NOX 46.67 46.67 46.67

36001 4012200004 U00002 OX1FP 30501202 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012200004 U00003 FZ1FP 30501204 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012200004 U00003 FZ2FP 30501204 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012200004 U00003 SS1FP 30501206 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012200004 U00012 OX2FP 30501202 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012200004 U00013 FC2FP 30501204 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36001 4012400001 041000 K12FP 30500706 NOX 20.00 20.00 20.00

36039 4192600021 U00K18 00CEP 30500706 NOX 20.00 20.00 20.00

36113 5520500013 0UKILN G02FP 30 500606 NOX 20.00 20.00 20.00

42019 420190024 101 4 30500706 NOX 0.00 52.38 52.38

42019 420190024 121 4 30500706 NOX 0.00 52.38 52.38

42073 420730024 226 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 54.29 54.29

42073 420730024 227 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 60.00 60.00Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 8

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID EU ID PROCESS
ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

42073 42073002 4 228 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 54.18 54.18

42073 420730026 501 1 30500706 NOX 0.00 56.52 56.52

42073 420730026 502 1 30500706 NOX 0.00 56.52 56.52

42077 420770019 101 2 30500606 NOX 0.00 54.40 54.40

42079 420790013 101 1 30501201 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

4207 9 420790013 102 1 30501201 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790013 103 1 30501204 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790013 104 1 30501204 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790060 104 1 30501301 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42095 420950006 102 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 57.0 4 57.04

42095 420950006 122 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 57.04 57.04

42095 420950012 101 2 30500706 NOX 0.00 45.21 45.21

42095 420950012 102 2 30500706 NOX 0.00 45.21 45.21

42095 420950045 142 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42095 420950045 143 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42095 420950127 101 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42095 420950127 102 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42095 420950127 103 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42095 420950127 104 1 30500606 NOX 0.00 32.20 32.20

42133 421330060 200 4 3900 0602 NOX 0.00 45.21 45.21
Control Measure: Glass and Fiberglass Furnaces

24510 510

- 0285 10 01S10 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

25027 1200856 04 0304 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

25027 1200856 05 0304 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

34005 45982 U6 OS 0 39999991 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75475 U1 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75475 U3 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75475 U35 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75475 U37 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75475 U5 OS1 30 501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75503 U2 OS1001 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75503 U3 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75503 U4 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75503 U5 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U12 OS1 3059 9999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U143 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U144 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U146 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U150 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U151 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75505 U6 OS1 30599999 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75506 U1 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34011 75506 U1 OS3 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34023 18070 U1 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34033 65499 U1 OS1 305014 01 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34033 65499 U2 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00

34033 65499 U3 OS1 30501401 NOX 0.00 20.00 20.00Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 9

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID EU ID PROCESS
ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

36001 4010300016 KILNSG 10BEI 39001399 NOX 20.00 20.00 20.00

36001 4010300016 KILNSG KNFFP 39001399 NOX 20.00 20.00 20.00

36001 4 012200004 EI0001 E20EI 39000689 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36011 7055200004 AFURNC FRNFP 30501402 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36015 8070400036 000001 O1AFP 30501402 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36069 8320500041 UFURNC FURFP 30501403 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36089 640300000 2 U00001 101FP 30501401 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36089 6403000002 U00003 300FP 30501416 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

36101 8460300008 PCCTNK GL2FP 30501416 NOX 70.00 70.00 70.00

42003 4200300164 003 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300164 007 1 3050140 4 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300164 008 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300165 P01 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300165 P02 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300165 P04 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 42003 00227 003 1 30590003 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300227 003 2 30590003 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300342 002 1 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42003 4200300342 002 3 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42007 420070012 103 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42007 420070012 104 1 30501408 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42007 420070012 105 1 30501408 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42007 420070022 102 1 30501799 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42027 420270021 P101 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42027 420270021 P102 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42027 420270021 P102 3 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42027 420270021 P103 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42031 420310009 102 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42031 420310009 S105A 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42039 4203900 12 101 1 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42039 420390012 102 1 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42041 420410013 101 1 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42041 420410013 102 1 30501403 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42045 420450041 101 1 30501410 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42051 420510020 101 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42051 420510020 102 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42065 420650003 110 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42065 420650007 103 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42065 420650007 104 1 30501402 NOX 85.0 0 85.00 85.00

42079 420790008 101 1 30501704 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790008 102 1 30501704 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790008 103 1 30501701 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790018 101 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790018 101 2 305 01402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790018 102 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790018 102 2 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42079 420790018 103 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 10

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. FIPS SITE ID EU ID PROCESS
ID SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

42083 420830002 101 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42083 42083 0002 201 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42083 420830006 101 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42083 420830006 102 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42083 420830006 103 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42095 420950047 101A 3 30501701 NOX 85.00 85.00 85. 00

42095 420950047 103A 3 30501701 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42117 421170020 P109 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42117 421170020 P124 1 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42117 421170020 P127 1 30501408 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42125 421250001 107 1 30501404 N OX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42125 421250001 107 3 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42129 421290233 101 2 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42129 421290233 102 2 30501404 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42129 421290553 101 1 30501402 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00

42133 421330066 10 4 3 30501414 NOX 85.00 85.00 85.00Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 11

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table E

- 2 NonEGU BOTW Control Factors for ICI Boilers

Boiler Size Range (mmBtu/hour)

< 25 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 250 >250

SCC CF0_25 CF25_50 CF50_100 CF100_250 CF250 SCC_L4 SCC_L3

10200104 10 50 10 40 0 Tr aveling Grate (Overfeed) Stoker Anthracite Coal

10200202 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200203 10 50 10 40 0 Cyclone Furnace Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200204 10 50 10 40 0 Spreader Stoker Bituminous/Subbi tuminous Coal

10200205 10 50 10 40 0 Overfeed Stoker Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200206 10 50 10 40 0 Underfeed Stoker Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200212 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Tangential) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200 222 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Subbituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10200401 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 6 Oil Residual Oil

10200402 10 50 10 40 0 10

- 100 Million Btu/hr ** Residual Oil

10200403 10 50 10 40 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr ** R esidual Oil

10200404 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 5 Oil Residual Oil

10200405 10 50 10 40 0 Cogeneration Residual Oil

10200501 10 50 10 40 0 Grades 1 and 2 Oil Distillate Oil

10200502 10 50 10 40 0 10

- 100 Million Btu/hr ** Distillate Oil

10200503 10 50 10 40 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr ** Distillate Oil

10200504 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 4 Oil Distillate Oil

10200505 10 50 10 40 0 Cogeneration Distillate Oil

10200601 10 50 10 75 0 > 100 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10200602 10 50 10 75 0 10

- 100 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10200603 10 50 10 75 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10200604 10 50 10 75 0 Cogeneration Natural Gas

10200701 10 50 10 75 0 Petroleum Refinery Gas Process Gas

10200704 10 50 10 75 0 Blast Furnace Gas Process Gas

10200707 10 50 10 75 0 Coke Oven Gas Process Gas

10200710 10 50 10 75 0 Cogeneration Process Gas

10200799 10 50 10 75 0 Other: Specify in Comments Process Gas

10200802 10 50 10 40 0 All Boiler Sizes Petroleum Coke

10200901 10 10 10 10 10 Bark

- fired Boiler Wood/Bark Waste

10200902 10 10 10 10 10 Wood/Bark

- fired Boiler Wood/Bark WasteFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 12

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. Boiler Size Range (mmBtu/hour)

< 25 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 250 >250

SCC CF0_25 CF25_50 CF50_100 CF100_250 CF250 SCC_L4 SCC_L3

10200903 10 10 10 10 10 Wood

- fired Boiler

- Wet Wood (>=20% moisture) Wood/Bark Waste

10200904 10 10 10 10 10 Bark

- fired Boiler (< 50,000 Lb Steam) ** Wood/Bark Waste

10200905 10 10 10 10 10 Wood/Bark

- fire d Boiler (< 50,000 Lb Steam) ** Wood/Bark Waste

10200906 10 10 10 10 10 Wood

- fired Boiler (< 50,000 Lb Steam) ** Wood/Bark Waste

10200907 10 10 10 10 10 Wood Cogeneration Wood/Bark Waste

10200908 10 10 10 10 10 Wood

- fired Boiler

- Dry Wood (<20% moistur e) Wood/Bark Waste

10201001 10 50 10 75 0 Butane Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)

10201002 10 50 10 75 0 Propane Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)

10201003 10 50 10 75 0 Butane/Propane Mixture: Specify Percent Butane in Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)

10300101 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal Anthracite Coal

10300102 10 50 10 40 0 Traveling Grate (Overfeed) Stoker Anthracite Coal

10300103 10 50 10 40 0 Hand

- fired Anthracite Coal

10300203 10 50 10 40 0 Cyclone Furnace (Bituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Co al

10300206 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300207 10 50 10 40 0 Overfeed Stoker (Bituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300208 10 50 10 40 0 Underfeed Stoker (Bituminous Coal) Bitumi nous/Subbituminous Coal

10300209 10 50 10 40 0 Spreader Stoker (Bituminous Coal) Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300225 10 50 10 40 0 Traveling Grate (Overfeed) Stoker (Subbituminous C Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300226 10 50 10 40 0 Pulverized Coal : Dry Bottom Tangential (Subbitumin Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal

10300401 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 6 Oil Residual Oil

10300402 10 50 10 40 0 10

- 100 Million Btu/hr ** Residual Oil

10300403 10 50 10 40 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr ** Residual Oil

10300404 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 5 Oil Residual Oil

10300501 10 50 10 40 0 Grades 1 and 2 Oil Distillate Oil

10300502 10 50 10 40 0 10

- 100 Million Btu/hr ** Distillate Oil

10300503 10 50 10 40 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr ** Distillate Oil

10300504 10 50 10 40 0 Grade 4 Oil Distil late Oil

10300601 10 50 10 75 0 > 100 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10300602 10 50 10 75 0 10

- 100 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10300603 10 50 10 75 0 < 10 Million Btu/hr Natural Gas

10300701 10 50 10 75 0 POTW Digester Gas

- fired Boiler Process Gas

10300799 10 50 10 75 0 Other Not Classified Process GasFinal TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 13

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. Boiler Size Range (mmBtu/hour)

< 25 25 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 250 >250

SCC CF0_25 CF25_50 CF50_100 CF100_250 CF250 SCC_L4 SCC_L3

10300811 10 50 10 75 0 Landfill Gas Landfill Gas

10300901 10 10 10 10 0 Bark

- fired Boiler Wood/Bark Waste

10300902 10 10 10 10 0 Wood/Bark

- fired Boiler Wood/Bark Waste

10300903 10 10 10 10 0 Wood

- fired Bo iler

- Wet Wood (>=20% moisture) Wood/Bark Waste

10300908 10 10 10 10 0 Wood

- fired Boiler

- Dry Wood (<20% moisture) Wood/Bark Waste

10301002 10 50 10 75 0 Propane Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)

10301003 10 50 10 75 0 Butane/Propane Mixture: Specify Perc ent Butane in Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG)Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 14

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table E

- 3 Area Source BOTW Control Factors for Adhesives and Sealants Application,
Asphalt P aving , C onsumer Products , and Portable Fuel Containers

FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

Control Measure : Adhesives and Sealants

09 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

10 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

11 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

23 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

24 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

25 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

33 24400 20000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

34 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

36 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

42 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40

44 2440020000 VOC 64.40 64.40 64.40
Control Measure: Asphalt Paving

09 2461022000 VOC 20.00 20.00 20.00

24 246102 2000 VOC 20.00 20.00 20.00

25 2461022000 VOC 20.00 20.00 20.00

33 2461022000 VOC 20.00 20.00 20.00

34 2461022000 VOC 75.00 75.00 75.00

36 2461022000 VOC 20.00 20.00 20.00

42 2461022000 VOC 0.00 20.00 20.00

Control Measure: Consumer Products

09 24650 00000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460100000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460200000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460400000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460500000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460600000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460800000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

10 2460900000 VOC 2.00 2.0 0 2.00

11 2460100000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460200000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460400000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460500000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460600000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460800000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

11 2460900000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460100 000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460200000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460400000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460500000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460600000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

23 2460800000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 15

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

### FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

23 2460900000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

24 2465000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

25 2460000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

33 2460000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

34 2465000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

36 2460000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

42 2465000000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460100000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460200000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 246040000 0 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460500000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460600000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460800000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

44 2460900000 VOC 2.00 2.00 2.00

Control Measure: Portable Fuel Containers

09 2501060300 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501011010 VOC 5 .80 23.20 58.00

10 2501011011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501011012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501011015 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501011016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501012010 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501012011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501012012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501012015 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

10 2501012016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501011011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501011012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501011016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501012011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

11 2501012012 VOC 5.80 23.2 0 58.00

11 2501012016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

23 2501060300 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501011011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501011012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501011016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501012011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

24 2501012012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58 .00

24 2501012016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

25 2501011000 VOC 0.00 23.20 58.00

25 2501012000 VOC 0.00 23.20 58.00

33 2501060300 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

34 2501000120 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

36 2501011011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

36 2501011012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

36 2501011016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

36 2501012011 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 16

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

### FIPSST SCC PLLTCODE CE_2009 CE_2012 CE_2018

36 2501012012 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

36 2501012016 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

42 2501060300 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00

44 2501060300 VOC 5.80 23.20 58.00Final TSD for MANE

- VU Emission Projections February 28, 2007 Appendix E

– BOTW Source Control Factors Page E

- 17

MACTEC Federal Programs , Inc. 

## Table E

- 4 Area Source BOTW Control F actors for ICI Boilers

SCC Control
Factor SCC_L4 SCC_L3 SCC_L2

2102001000 18.9 Total: All Boiler Types Anthracite Coal Industrial

2102002000 18.9 Total: All Boiler Types Bituminous/Subbituminous
Coal Industrial

2102004000 18.9 Total: Boilers and IC Eng ines Distillate Oil Industrial

2102005000 18.9 Total: All Boiler Types Residual Oil Industrial

2102006000 18.9 Total: Boilers and IC Engines Natural Gas Industrial

2102007000 18.9 Total: All Boiler Types Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) Industrial

2102008 000 10.0 Total: All Boiler Types Wood Industrial

2102011000 10.0 Total: All Boiler Types Kerosene Industrial

2103001000 19.5 Total: All Boiler Types Anthracite Coal Commercial/Institutional

2103002000 19.5 Total: All Boiler Types Bituminous/Subbituminou s Coal Commercial/Institutional

2103004000 19.5 Total: Boilers and IC Engines Distillate Oil Commercial/Institutional

2103004001 19.5 Distillate Oil Commercial/Institutional

2103004002 19.5 Distillate Oil Commercial/Institutional

2103005000 19.5 Tota l: All Boiler Types Residual Oil Commercial/Institutional

2103006000 19.5 Total: Boilers and IC Engines Natural Gas Commercial/Institutional

2103007000 19.5 Total: All Combustor Types Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) Commercial/Institutional

2103008000 10. 0 Total: All Boiler Types Wood Commercial/Institutional

2103011000 10.0 Total: All Combustor Types Kerosene Commercial/Institutional

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08



# Documentation of 2018 Emissions fr om Electric Generating Units
in the Eastern United States for MANE-VU’s Regional Haze Modeling

Revised Final Draft

28 April 2008

Prepared for:

Mid-Atlantic / Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU)

Prepared by:

Alpine Geophysics, LLC

387 Pollard Mine Road Burnsville, NC 28714

Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Mana gement Association (MARAMA)
8900 LaSalle Road
Suite 636 Towson, MD 21286

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Alpine Geophysics, LLC (Alpine), was under c ontract with the Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA) to assist in the revision, analysis, and adjustment of
emission inventories and a ssociated factors necessary to provi de data and inputs required for air quality analyses and state implemen tation plan (SIP) submittals.

Greg Stella of Alpine prepar ed a final draft of this doc ument for MANE-VU/MARAMA under
Work Order #7 of the MANE-VU Future Year Em issions Inventory Umbrel la Contract. This work was supported by funds provided to MARAMA by the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) through their memora ndum of agreement. OTC's funding for this work was provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen cy under assistance agreement XA 97318101.

MARAMA further revised Section 5 of the document after receipt of Mr. Stella ’s final work product. MARAMA provided text and tables to reflect emissions inventory analysis that continued after the expiration of Alpine’s contract.

Special recognition is given to Julie McDill, MARAMA’s project manage r, who initiated the collection and aggregation of documentation used to prepare this report. Ms. McDill and Susan Wierman, MARAMA’s Executive Direct or provided analytical and ed itorial contributions to the preparation of this document, and Patrick Davis of MARAMA and Dr. John Graham of
NESCAUM contributed to em issions inventory data analysis and summaries.

This report was prepared for use by the MANE- VU States and does not necessarily represent the position of the U.S. Enviro nmental Protection Agency.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 B ACKGROUND 

## ...................................................................................................................... 1

2 PREPARATION OF EGU FORECASTS ........................................................................... 2

2.1 EGU F ORECAST 

## M ETHODS 

## D OCUMENT 

## ............................................................................... 3
2.2 T HE 

## I NTEGRATED 

## P LANNING 

## M ODEL 

## (IPM) ........................................................................ 4
2.3 U.S. EPA U SE OF 

## IPM ......................................................................................................... 4

2.3.1 EPA’s Base Ca se 20 04 .......................................................................................................... .................. 5
2.3.2 EPA CAIR Case ................................................................................................................. ...................... 6
2.3.3 EPA’s CAIR Modeling Limitations ............................................................................................... ........... 6 

## 2.4 RPO U SE OF 

## IPM

– P HASE 

## I ................................................................................................ 7
2.5 RPO A DJUSTMENTS TO 

## IPM

– P HASE 

## II .............................................................................. 8
2.6 S TATE 

## R ESULTS



## – P HASE 

## II .................................................................................................. 9
2.7 MANE-VU S PONSORED 

## CAIR P LUS 

## IPM M ODELING 

## ...................................................... 11

3 POST PROCESSING OF IPM OUTPUT ......................................................................... 12

3.1 U SE OF 

## SMOKE E MISSIONS 

## P ROCESSING 

## M ODEL 

## ............................................................. 12
3.2 P REPARING 

## IPM O UTPUT FOR 

## U SE IN 

## SMOKE M ODEL 

## ..................................................... 12

3.2.1 IPM to NIF .................................................................................................................... ......................... 13 

## 3.3 S TATE 

## R ESULTS



## – P HASE 

## II A UGMENTED 

## .......................................................................... 18
3.4 NIF TO 

## IDA ....................................................................................................................... 18

4 MODIFICATIONS BY OTHER REGIONS .................................................................... 20

4.1 E MISSION 

## C ONTROL 

## M ODIFICATIONS WITHIN 

## VISTAS, MRPO, AND 

## CENRAP ............... 20
4.2 E MISSION 

## F ACTOR AND 

## C ONTROL 

## M ODIFICATIONS FOR 

## VISTAS E MISSION 

## S OURCES 

## ..... 20
4.3 E MISSION 

## I NVENTORY 

## R EPLACEMENT WITHIN 

## WRAP D OMAIN 

## ........................................ 21
4.4 E LIMINATING 

## D OUBLE 

## C OUNTING OF 

## EGU U NITS 

## ............................................................ 21
4.5 P RELIMINARY 

## R ESULTS FROM 

## P HASE 

## II A DDITIONAL 

## M ODIFICATIONS 

## ............................. 22
4.6 R EVISED 

## R ESULTS



## – VISTAS B ASE 

## G2 A DJUSTMENT 

## ....................................................... 24

5 ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENTS BY NORT HEASTERN STATES AND MODELERS
FOR REGIONAL HAZE SIP MODELING ................................................................... 26

5.1 I NTRODUCTION 

## .................................................................................................................. 26
5.2 B EST 

## A VAILABLE 

## R ETROFIT 

## T ECHNOLOGY 

## (BART) ......................................................... 26
5.3 MANE-VU S TATE 

## M ODIFICATIONS OF 

## IPM R ESULTS 

## ...................................................... 26
5.4 MANE-VU EGU S TRATEGY 

## ............................................................................................. 27
5.5 I MPLEMENTATION OF 

## MANE-VU C ONTROL 

## S TRATEGY FOR 

## K EY 

## EGU S 

## .......................... 28
5.6 S TATE 

## R ESULTS



## – N ORTHEASTERN 

## S TATE 

## A DJUSTMENTS 

## ................................................. 30

6 EGU PREPARATION TIMELINE ................................................................................... 33

7 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 34

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. State Level Fuel Use and Emissi on Summary; 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f.xls. 10

Table 2. SCC Default Heat Content and Stack Pa rameters from IPM to NIF Conversion. 15

Table 3. EPA-Approved Emission Factor File for CO, VOC, filte rable PM, and NH 3 

## . 16

Table 4. EPA-approved condensable PM emi ssion factor assignment. 17

Table 5. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f with Pollutant Augmentation. Modeling file ida_egu_18_basef_2453605.txt from VISTAS BaseF. (fossil-only) 19

Table 6. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTAS Base G Modeling file ptinv_egu_2018_11sep2006.txt. Based on 2018 VI STASII_PC_1f with adjustments from VISTAS, MRPO, and WRAP. 23

Table 7. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTAS Base G2 Modeling file egu_18_vistas_g2_20feb2007.txt. Based on 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f with adjustments from VISTAS, MRPO, and WRAP. 25

Table 8. Comparison of Regional SO 2 

## Emissions Estimates (1000 tons per year)
29

Table 9. State Level 2018 Emission Summary; March 2008 MANE-VU EGU Modeling Inventory 31

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A. Top Electric Generating Emission Po ints Contributing to Visibility Impairment in MANE-VU in 2002 34

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

1 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Development of an emissions inventory is an important foundation for performing regional scale atmospheric modeling for regulatory air quality management. The accuracy of the atmospheric model’s prediction of air quality depends, in part , on the accurate representation of emissions from a variety of source sectors including point, area, non-road, on-road and biogenic sources. Electric generating units (EGUs) are an important point source s ector and are often considered for controls to meet air quality objectives. Theref ore, it is especially im portant to accurately represent and document EGU emissions and associ ated characteristics in a regulatory modeling application. This report is intended to describe the development of fu ture year EGU emission
estimates for use in Mid-Atla ntic/Northeast Visibility Uni on (MANE-VU) 2018 regional haze modeling.

This document synthesizes information from severa l documents that already describe parts of the process of preparing e missions estimates and provides inform ation not yet included in other
documents. It covers the follow ing: preparation of the inter-Regional Pl anning Organization (RPO) Integrated Planning Model ® 

## (IPM) runs commonly refe rred to as the Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southe ast (VISTAS) IPM runs, the postprocessing of those runs to cr eate Sparse Matrix Operator Ke rnel Emissions (SMOKE) input files, the modification of those fi les to reflect state estimates of emissions, and the adjustments made by MANE-VU modelers to maintain the Clean Air Inters tate Rule (CAIR) cap. It also provides background information a bout preparing EGU forecasts and related work by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

2 2 PREPARATION OF EGU FORECASTS

Emission projections for point sources are depend ent upon changes in source level activity, the
emission factors or inst alled controls. The approach taken to project point source emissions depends on the level of detail n ecessary in the projection year file. Changes in point source emissions are accounted for by a combination of gr owth, control, and reti rement rates. Growth rates are applied to estimate the ov erall change in activity, while retirement rates are applied to estimate the decrease in emissions activity fro m existing sources. Retir ement (and replacement
of these sources with new sources ) must be considered because re gulations affecting new sources may differ from those affecting existing sources.

The projection year control f actor accounts for both changes in emission factors due to technology improvements and new levels of contro l required by regulations . The control factor accounts for three variables: regulation control, rule effectiveness, and rule penetration.

Control factors are closely linked to the type of emi ssion process (identified by Source Classification Code (SCC)) and s econdarily to the type of indus try identified by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC). Point source projections should acc ount for Federal, State, and local regulations affect ing these categories.

A complicating factor is the requirement for emission offsets in nonattainment areas through New Source Review requirements. This may be accounted for by 1) restricting growth under the assumption that it will be offs et; 2) applying reductions to sel ected source categories to account for the emission growth which must be offset; or 3) selecting the individual sources, based on a cost analysis, from which offsets are likely to come.

When projecting Electri city Generating Unit (EGU) emissions in the Eastern United States, emission trading should be considered. There are three general approaches to performing projections while accounting for such trading sche mes. The first option is to optimize control
levels across the domain based on the cost of alte rnative controls. The second option is to survey individual sources to determine how they will co mply (will they apply c ontrols and sell or buy allowances) and use this as the basis for the future year control level. The third option is to apply
the control level used to establ ish the budget to all a ffected sources and i gnore which sources may choose to buy or sell credits/allowances.

Other factors which must be considered include programs, such as fuel switching, designed to provide source flexibility in meeting future ai r quality requirements. Fu el switching refers to
instances where a unit historical ly burned one primary fuel, such as coal, and under a "fuel switching" program the unit would burn an alternate fuel, such as natural gas, during a certain period of time and may switch back to the "historic" fuel for so me or all of the year. Fuel switching is often done in cases where sources aver age their emissions to meet federal mandates. Fuel switching may also be used as a seasonal compliance stra tegy (e.g., switching from residual fuel oil to natural gas in orde r to reduce NOx emissions during th e ozone season. The variation in emissions over the course of the year caused by fuels switching must be calculated properly in projections.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

3 Repowering is another example of a planned change in emission rates which should be considered. In this case, the uni t may be switching enti rely from coal to na tural gas or may be completing a major modification whic h would lower the emission rate.

Spatial allocation is another factor which must be considered, particularly if air quality modeling will be performed using the projection. For poi nt sources, important questions are which
facilities will retire and wher e new growth will occur. Changes in land use patterns may also impact the location of point s ource emissions. As undeveloped and rural areas become suburban and urban areas, the number of point sources in that area will increase.

As can be seen from the disc ussion above, any number of comp licating issues can lead to emission forecasts which may diffe r from user to user. An incons istent decision made between two parties can lead to significan t differences in growt h, control, or placemen t of emissions from point source forecasts. For this reason, the RPOs made a conscious decision to utilize consistent forecasting methods for EGU emissions, as they ar e one of the most signi ficant contributors to regional haze in the United States. This decision, to coordinate on the projection of EGU source emissions, led to the preparat ion of an EGU forecast met hods document from which a
coordinated decision was made on methods to develop EGU emissions in future years.

2.1 EGU Forecast Methods Document

Early in the planning process there was a joint agreement by the RPOs to work together to develop future year EGU emissions estimates based on the use of the Integrated Planning
Model ® 

## (IPM). The decision to use IP M modeling resulted in part on a study of EGU forecast methods by E.H. Pechan and Associates, In c. (Pechan) for the Midwest Regional Planning Organization (MRPO) (Pechan, 2004), which r ecommended IPM as a viable methodology. Although IPM results were availa ble from work conducte d by EPA to support their rulemaking for the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), the RP Os concluded that certain model inputs needed to be revised. Thus, the RPOs decided to work t ogether to hire contract ors to conduct new IPM modeling and to post-process the IPM results. Th is section describes the recommendation to use
IPM.

The Lake Michigan Air Direct ors Consortium (LADCO) sought contractor assistance in reviewing emissions inventory growth for existing and new EG Us (Pechan, 2004). Because the
results of EGU emission forecasts are used in urban or regional scale air quality modeling exercises to estimate future y ear air pollutant con centrations, growth methods are needed to supply model-ready emission mode l inputs. The purpose of LADCO’ s project was to begin to examine EGU growth methods.

The primary pollutants of intere st were sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

## ), oxides of nitrogen (NO
x 

## ), particulate matter (PM), ammonia (NH 3 

## ), and mercury (Hg). Projecti on years of interest included 2009 (the approximate ti me for ozone and PM 2.5 

## attainment) and 2018 (a longer term regional haze planning horizon). The geographi c area of interest was the easte rn half of the United States (to capture the trading issues affecting the Midwest States).

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

4 This 2004 Pechan report provided a detailed eval uation of three EGU grow th modeling methods
of interest to the LADCO States for consid eration in developing its own approach. These evaluations addressed the following a ttributes of each modeling approach:

• Description of primary an alytical modeling methods; • Geographic areas of application; • Advantages; and • Disadvantages.

The material in this evaluation was intended to be used to determine which of the currently available modeling approaches mig ht be best suited for use by the LADCO States (and other RPOs) for future state implementation plan (SIP ) and air dispersion mode ling work. The models evaluated in this report included the IPM, th e National Energy Modeli ng System (NEMS), and the Electric Power Market Model (EPMM).

Based on the conclusions and summary of the re port (Pechan, 2004), the four participating RPOs (MANE-VU, MRPO, VISTAS, and the Central Regional Air Pl anning Association, CENRAP)
decided to use IPM as the tool for forecasting EGU emissions.

2.2 The Integrated Planning Model (IPM)

IPM was developed by ICF Consu lting, Inc. (ICF) and used to s upport public and private sector
clients. This model is a mult i-regional, dynamic, deterministic linear programming model of the U.S. electric power sector . It provides forecasts of least-co st capacity expansion, electricity dispatch, and emission control strategies fo r meeting energy dema nd and environmental, transmission, dispatch, and reliab ility constraints. It can be us ed to evaluate the cost and emissions impacts of proposed pol icies to limit emissions of SO 2 

## , NO
x 

## , carbon dioxide (CO 2 

## ), and Hg from the electric power s ector. The IPM model was a key anal ytical tool used by EPA in developing CAIR and the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR).

Among the factors that make IP M particularly well suited to model multi-emissions control programs are (1) its ability to capture complex interactions among the electric power, fuel, and environmental markets; (2) it s detail-rich representation of emission control options encompassing a broad array of re trofit technologies along with emission reductions through fuel switching, changes in capacity mix and electricity dispatch strategies; and (3) its capability to model a variety of environmental market mech anisms, such as emissions caps, allowances, trading, and banking. IPM's ability to capture th e dynamics of the allowance market and its provision of a wide range of emissions reduction options are particularly important for assessing the impact of multi-emissions envir onmental policies like CAIR and CAMR.

2.3 U.S. EPA Use of IPM

The U.S. EPA uses IPM to analy ze the projected impact of enviro nmental policies on the electric power sector in the 48 contiguous stat es and the District of Columbia.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

5 2.3.1 EPA’s Base Case 2004

The EPA’s Base Case 2004 (EPA, 2005a) served as the starting point against which EPA compared various policy scenarios. It is a projecti on of electricity sector activity that takes into
account federal and state air emissi on laws and regulations whose provi sions were either in effect or enacted and clearly delineat ed at the time the base case was finalized in August 2004. Regulations mandated under the Clean Air Ac t Amendments of 1990 (CAAA), but whose provisions have not yet been finalized, were not included in the base case. These include:

• Measures to Implement Ozone and Particulate Matter (PM) Standards : EPA Base Case 2004 predates and so does not include the pr ovisions of CAIR, the primary federal regulatory measure for achievi ng the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone (8-hour standard of 0.08 ppm) and fi ne particles (24-hour average of 65 ug/m3 or less and annual mean of 15 ug/m3 for part icles of diameter 2.5 micrometers or less, i.e., PM 2.5 

## ). EPA Base Case 2004 was used to evaluate policy a lternatives which ultimately resulted in CAIR. The final CA IR was issued on March 10, 2005. EPA Base Case 2004 includes measures to implement ozone and particulate matt er standards to the
extent that some of the state regulations included in EPA Base Ca se 2004 contain measures to bring non-attainment areas into attainment. Individua l permits issued by states in response to ozone a nd particulate matter standards are not captured in the base

case.

• Mercury Regulations on Elect ric Steam Generating Units: EPA Base Case 2004 predates both CAMR, which was issued by EPA on March 15, 2005 and the “Maximum Achievable Control Technology” (MACT) st andards, which were scheduled to be promulgated by December 15, 2004, but, pending li tigation, have been superseded by CAMR. Consequently, this base case does not include any federal regulatory measures for mercury control. (CAM R was vacated in 2008.)

• Clean Air Visibility Rules: On July 1, 1999, EPA issued Regional Haze Regulations to meet the national goal for visibility estab lished in Section 169A of the CAAA, which calls for “prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in Class I areas (156 national parks and wild erness areas), which impairment results from manmade air pollution.” The regul ations required states to submit revised SIPs that (1) establish goals that provide for reasonable progre ss towards achieving natural visibility conditions at Class I areas, (2) adopt a long-term control strategy that includes such measures as are necessary to achieve the reasonable progress goals, and (3) require Best Available Retrofit Technolog y (BART) for sources in listed source categories placed in operation between 1962 and 1977.

In effect, EPA Base Case 2004 offe red a snapshot projection of th e electric sector assuming that the only future environmental regu lations were those with provisi ons known at the time that the base case assumptions were finali zed. While not necessarily an accu rate reflection of what would actually occur, this assumption ensured that th e base case was policy neutral with respect to future environmental policies.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

6 2.3.2 EPA CAIR Case

On January 30, 2004, EPA proposed CAIR, which set emission reduction requirements for 29
States and the District of Columbia. Those emission reduction requirements were based on achieving highly cost-effective emission reduction s from large electricity generating units.

While EPA believed that the modeling it initially perform ed for the January 2004 proposal provided a reasonable estimate of the impact of requiring hi ghly cost-effective emission reductions from electricity generating units, it did not exactly model the proposed control region.
For both SO 2 

## and NO
x 

## , EPA used modeling assumptions that differed slightly from the January 2004 CAIR proposal. For SO 2 

## in particular, EPA modeled th e program assuming a cap on
national emissions rather than in the 29 St ates proposed. Although EPA believed the modeling done at that time provided a r easonable approximation of the im pacts of the original CAIR, because 92 percent of the SO 2 

## emissions in the 48 contiguous Stat es occur in the 28 States that were covered by the proposal, EPA completed a dditional analysis. This additional analysis
examined the effect of coveri ng the geographic region proposed in the January 30, 2004 proposal using the NO
x 

## emissions cap and a clos e approximation of the SO 2 

## cap proposed for CAIR (EPA, 2005a).

For the supplemental proposal, EPA performed refined modeling of th e emission reduction requirements proposed on January 30, 2004. In this refined modeling, EPA modeled the exact control regions for both SO 2 

## and NO
x 

## , as proposed.

2.3.3 EPA’s CAIR Modeling Limitations

The U.S. EPA’s modeling was based on its best judgment for various input assumptions that were uncertain, particularly assu mptions for future fuel prices and electricity demand growth (EPA, 2004). In addition, modeling using IPM did not take in to account the potential for advancements in the capabilities of pollution control t echnologies for SO 2 

## and NO
x 

## removal as
well as reductions in their costs over time.

Retirement Ratios: EPA issued a CAIR supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking that proposed two alternat ives for how the SO 2 

## reduction target would be achieved. The proposal took comment on implementing the reduction requirements in the s econd phase either by using a 2.86 to 1 ratio (which woul d match the 65 percent SO 2 

## reduction target) of acid rain allowances to emissions, or alternatively, by implemen ting the reductions usi ng a 3 to 1 ratio (for administrative simplicity) and then letting Stat es create and distribute additional allowances equal to the surplus created by the 3 to 1 ratio to achieve the proposed 65 percent reduction. In either case, the effective cap on SO 2 

## emissions from the power s ector would be the same.

Modelers assumed a 3 to 1 Title IV allowance retirement ratio for 2015 and beyond to implement the reductions in the proposed control region. The model did not add back the 130,000 tons of
SO 2 

## from over-compliance that woul d result from this ratio. Ther efore, in this modeling, EPA analyzed slightly greater SO 2 

## emission reductions than required by the proposal. This assumption was made for modeling simplicity and was expected to result in a slight ov erestimate of costs for the proposal and of the emissions reductions achieved.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

7 BART: The EPA did not incorporate any best achievable retrofit technology (BART) modeling in this analysis. BART would achieve reductions in non-CAIR St ates and had the potential to mitigate leakage issues.

Demand Response: EPA’s 2004 CAIR case includes a demand response to increased gas prices but not electricity prices. In th e model, increased gas prices w ould prompt the public to curtail their use of gas and encourage them to seek substitutes. However, no provision for demand response was included for electric ity prices. If demand had been allowed to change in response to increasing prices of electri city,, one can assume that cons umers would have reduced their demand for electricity, lowering el ectricity prices and reducing generation and emissions to some

extent.

State Rules: Only some State adopted rules were inco rporated into EPA’s modeling framework. A list of the State Multi-pollutant regulations used in IPM 2.1, IPM 2.1.6, and IPM 2.1.9 can be located in Appendix 3-2 of EP A’s Standalone Docu mentation for EPA Base Case 2004 (v.2.1.9) Using the Integrated Planning Model (EPA, 2005a).

Because of the limitations noted above, the RPOs decided to in itiate their own IPM modeling based on the EPA’s latest update of the IPM input framework, called IPM 2.1.9. EPA completed the input framework for IP M 2.1.9 in March of 2003.

2.4 RPO Use of IPM – Phase I

In August 2004, VISTAS contracted with ICF to run IPM to provide revised utility forecasts for
2009 and 2018 under two future scenarios – Base Case and CAIR Case (ICF, 2004). The Base Case represented the current operation of the pow er system under laws and regulations as known at the time the run was made, including those that come into force in the study horizon. The
CAIR Case was the Base Case with the proposed CAIR rule s uperimposed. Run results were parsed at the unit level fo r the 2009 and 2018 run years.

In August 2004, MRPO contracted with Pechan to post-proce ss the VISTAS’ IP M outputs to provide the (National Emission In ventory Input Format) NIF format ted emission files needed for the regional inventory. The IPM output files were delivered by ICF to VISTAS in November 2004 and the post-processed data files were deliv ered by Pechan to the MRPO in December
2004.

These IPM runs (VISTAS_CAIR_2) and the NIF file s that were generated from the parsed data sets are commonly referred to as the Phase I In ter-RPO runs. The Phase I runs were ultimately not used in RPO modeling of regional haze, as further revisions to the inputs were necessary once CAIR was adopted.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

8 2.5 RPO Adjustments to IPM – Phase II

On March 10, 2005, EPA issued the final CAIR . A consortium of RPOs , (MANE-VU, VISTAS, MRPO, and CENRAP) conduc ted another round of IPM modeli ng which reflected changes to control assumptions based on the final CAIR as well as additional change s to model inputs based on state and local agency and st akeholder comments. Several conf erence calls were conducted in the spring of 2005 among the participating RP Os to discuss and provide comments on IPM assumptions related to six main topics: power system operation, generating resources, emission control technologies, set-up parameters, financia l assumptions, and fuel assumptions. Based on these discussions, VISTAS sponsored a new se t of IPM runs to reflect the final CAIR requirements as well as certain ch anges to IPM assumptions that we re agreed to by the RPOs. ICF performed the following four runs using IPM dur ing the summer of 2005. This set of IPM
runs is referred to as the VISTAS Ph ase II analysis or Inter-RPO v.2.1.9 runs.

• Base Case with EPA 2.1.9 coal, gas, and oil price assumptions (VISTASII_BC_1Z1).

• Base Case with EPA 2.1.9 coal and gas supply curves adju sted for the U.S. Energy
Information Administration’s most recent Annual Energy Outlook (AEO 2005) reference case price and volume relationships (VISTASII_BC_2Y).

• Strategy Case with EPA 2.1.9 coal, gas and oil price assumptions (VISTASII_PC_1f).

• Strategy Case with EPA 2.1.9 coal and ga s supply curves adjusted for AEO 2005 reference case price and volume re lationships (VISTASII_PC_2C).

The above runs were parsed for 2009 and 2018 run years. The output taken from the Strategy Case with EPA 2.1.9 coal, gas, a nd oil price assumptions (VISTAS II_PC_1f) is also referred to
as the Inter-RPO CAIR Case IPM 2.1.9 and is the basis for discussion in the remainder of this
report.

The Phase II scenarios were based on VISTAS Phase I and EPA IPM 2.1.9 assumptions (EPA, 2005b). Additional changes that were implemented in the above four runs are summarized below and in associated documentation (ICF, 2007):

• Unadjusted AEO 2005 elect ricity demand projections were used. (U.S. EPA runs were adjusted to reflect reduced demand due to vol untary conservation projects sponsored by U.S. EPA)

• Gas supply curves were adjusted for AEO 2005 reference case price and volume relationships. The EPA 2.1.9 gas supply curves were scaled such that IPM solved for AEO 2005 gas prices when the power sector gas demand in IP M is consistent with AEO 2005 power sector gas demand projections.

• The coal supply curves used in EPA 2.1.9 were scaled such that the average mine mouth coal prices that the IPM was solving in aggr egated coal supply regions were comparable to AEO 2005. Coal grades and supply re gions contained in AEO 2005 and EPA 2.1.9 were not directly comparable. An iterative approach was used to obtain comparable results. The coal transportation matrix was not updated with Energy Information Administration (EIA) assumptions due to si gnificant differences between the EPA 2.1.9 and EIA AEO 2005 coal supply and coal demand region configurations.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

9 • The cost and performance of new units we re updated to AEO 2005 reference case levels.

• The run years 2008, 2009, 2012, 2015, 2018, 2020 and 2026 were modeled.

• The AEO 2005 life extension costs for fossi l and nuclear units were incorporated.

• The extensive NEEDS comments provided by VISTAS, MRPO, CENRAP and MANEVU were incorporated into th e Phase I NEEDS input file.

• MANE-VU’s comments in regards to the north east state regulations were incorporated.

• Northeast Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) were modeled based on the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative analysis. A single RPS cap was modeled for MA, RI, NY, NJ, MD, and CT. These states c ould buy credits from NY or from the PJM Interconnection and New England model regions.

• Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) and Scr ubber Feasibility Limits : No limits were applied in 2008, 2009 and 2010 to the capacity for installing these emissions controls.

• The Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR) was not modeled.

• Modelers assumed a Title IV SO 2 

## Bank for 2007 of 4.98 million tons.

• The investments required under the Illinois Power, Mirant and First Energy NSR settlements (as identified during spring 2005) were incorporated in the above runs.

For the Phase II inter-RPO set of IPM runs, ICF generated two different pa rsed files for each of the two scenarios. One file includes all fuel burning units (fossil, biomass, landfill gas) as well as non-fuel burning units (hydro, wind, etc.). The second file contains just the fossil-fuel burning units (e.g., emissions from biomass and landfill gas are omitted). In all RPOs the fossil-only file was used for modeling. This is consistent with EPA, since EPA used the fossil only results for CAIR analyses.

2.6 State Results – Phase II

Table 1 presents unmodified State level fuel use and emission results from the 2018 Inter-RPO
CAIR Case IPM v. 2.1.9 fossi l-only parsed file (VISTASII_PC _1f). Note that IPM produces only NO
x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions estimates.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

10 Table 1. State Level Fuel Use and Emission Su mmary; 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f .xls. (fossil only)

State RPO Summer Annual Summer NOx Annual NOx Annual SO2
Connecticut MANE-VU 62.1572 142.7141 1,521 3,418 6,697 Delaware MANE-VU 41.9472 92.7542 5,485 12,341 35,442

District Of Columbia MANE-VU 2.0774 4.8716 49 103 83 Maine MANE-VU 21.8494 49.8748 804 1,827 5,436 Maryland MANE-VU 195.3393 437.8991 6,832 14,709 28,065 Massachusetts MANE-VU 188.0653 433.3227 8,004 18,157 17,486 New Hampshire MANE-VU 32.4638 73.8699 1,393 3,089 7,469 New Jersey MANE-VU 140.8000 304.7240 6,432 13,636 32,495
New York MANE-VU 282.4272 669.0821 10,926 24,376 51,445 Pennsylvania MANE-VU 687.1446 1,540.1322 36,329 82,881 135,946

Rhode Island MANE-VU 15.1701 40.0407 244 576 55

Vermont MANE-VU 1.3677 3.0597 74 105 35 MANE-VU Total 1,670.8093 3,792.3450 78,093 175,219 320,651
Alabama VISTAS 605.2513 1,329.1117 19,416 41,715 190,029
Florida VISTAS 831.5942 1,813.5433 26,620 56,506 139,526 Georgia VISTAS 687.9659 1,530.2279 26,228 56,180 178,196 Kentucky VISTAS 494.6026 1,121.9188 27,904 64,099 229,596 Mississippi VISTAS 211.7079 443.3923 4,269 8,895 27,226
North Carolina VISTAS 431.1262 984.5996 25,412 57,774 102,217 South Carolina VISTAS 326.3757 749.2039 20,240 46,318 118,584
Tennessee VISTAS 300.8087 672.6405 13,348 29,873 112,343 Virginia VISTAS 305.6546 710.9991 18,443 43,144 80,602 West Virginia VISTAS 477.7910 1,080.9570 22,556 51,208 124,464 VISTAS Total 4,672.8781 10,436.5940 204,435 455,711 1,302,784
Illinois MRPO 564.3359 1,281.6624 31,214 71,234 241,136 Indiana MRPO 665.8976 1,534.4126 40,820 95,376 376,864 Michigan MRPO 537.6731 1,257.6784 42,629 98,685 398,562 Ohio MRPO 773.6334 1,785.3989 35,888 83,129 215,501
Wisconsin MRPO 303.7451 691.5260 19,794 45,701 155,369 MRPO Total 2,845.2851 6,550.6783 170,345 394,124 1,387,433
Arkansas CENRAP 211.9455 479.1864 14,836 33,097 82,605
Iowa CENRAP 238.7101 548.7369 22,252 51,119 147,305
Kansas CENRAP 213.4288 465.8685 37,207 83,333 81,486 Louisiana CENRAP 225.6282 481.9880 14,240 30,432 74,263
Minnesota CENRAP 175.6582 388.8279 17,940 41,029 85,847 Missouri CENRAP 416.5504 918.5720 34,350 77,660 280,887
Nebraska CENRAP 113.8064 255.2901 22,524 50,781 73,629 Oklahoma CENRAP 357.5522 745.1097 36,695 76,048 113,680
Texas CENRAP 1,710.8244 3,236.6605 79,449 153,837 339,433 CENRAP Total 3,664.1040 7,520.2400 279,493 597,336 1,279,135
Arizona WRAP 442.6160 1,022.0551 36,168 81,858 60,640 California WRAP 602.8505 1,403.6297 10,464 23,767 5,447 Colorado WRAP 215.1782 486.7281 31,074 70,171 87,163

Idaho WRAP 14.5575 34.1372 309 718 0
Montana WRAP 88.4363 200.1442 17,034 38,504 22,066
Nevada WRAP 179.3334 408.0758 20,978 47,404 31,172 New Mexico WRAP 155.2294 344.7868 32,965 74,010 52,917
North Dakota WRAP 131.5025 297.0199 31,745 71,711 108,645 Oregon WRAP 109.6842 255.3128 4,968 11,330 10,034
South Dakota WRAP 16.3929 36.8730 6,457 14,574 12,085 Utah WRAP 146.1278 330.1164 26,905 60,782 37,819 Washington WRAP 155.7190 362.9219 11,625 26,379 12,236 Wyoming WRAP 202.3566 457.1643 35,935 81,182 40,265 WRAP Total 2,459.9843 5,638.9652 266,628 602,390 480,488 National Total 15,313.0609 33,938.8226 998,994 2,224,779 4,770,490 Fuel Use (TBtu) Emissions (Tons)

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

11 2.7 MANE-VU Sponsored CAIR Plus IPM Modeling

Using the IPM Phase II RPO modeli ng platform MANE-VU contracted with ICF to evaluate the impact of both tightening the SO 2 

## and NO
x 

## CAIR caps and to expand th e CAIR region to include the electricity generating sector in additional stat es the Eastern United Stat es. As part of this analysis, ICF developed a new Base Case th at implemented EPA’s CAIR, CAMR and CAVR policies and a Policy Case with lower SO 2 

## and NO
x 

## CAIR caps in an extended region. The new Base Case was developed for co mparison to the Policy Case. Th e model assumptions and data used in this analysis are somewhat different than those in the RPO Phase II analysis and are
described in Section B of the project report (ICF, 2007). Neither the base or policy cases from the CAIR Plus project were used in subsequent SIP modeling.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

12 3 POST PROCESSING OF IPM OUTPUT

3.1 Use of SMOKE Emission s Processing Model

On behalf of MANE-VU, NESCAUM modelers us ed an emissions processing model to prepare data produced by the IPM model for use in air quality and visibility modeling. The Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emis sions (SMOKE) Modeling System is an emissions processing system designed to create gridde d, speciated, hourly emissions fo r input into a variety of air quality models, such as EPA’s Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model and Regional Modeling System for Aerosols and Deposition (REMSAD) (Houyoux, et. al., 2000). SMOKE supports area, biogenic, mobile (both onroad and nonroad), and point source emissions processing for criteria, particul ate, and toxic pollutants. Fo r biogenic emissions modeling, SMOKE uses the Biogeni c Emission Inventory System, vers ion 2.3 (BEIS2) and version 3.09 and 3.12 (BEIS3). SMOKE is also integrated with the onroad emissions model MOBILE6.

The sparse matrix approach used throughout SM OKE permits rapid and fl exible processing of emissions data. Flexible processing comes from splitting the processing steps of inventory growth, controls, chemical speciation, tempor al allocation, and spatial allocation into independent steps whenever possi ble. The results from these step s are merged together in the final stage of processing using vector-matrix multipli cation. It allows individual steps (such as adding a new control strategy, or processing for a different grid) to be performed and merged without having to redo all of th e other processing steps. Indi vidual emission scenarios were simulated for MANE-VU using the SMOKE Modeling System.

The Northeast States for Coor dinated Air Use Management (N ESCAUM), on behalf of MANEVU and its participating States, c onducted regional air quality si mulations for calendar year 2002 and several future periods (NESCAUM, 2008). This work was directed at satisfying a number of goals under the Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP), including a contribution assessment, a pollution apportionment for 2018, and the evaluation of visibility be nefits of control measures being considered for achieving reasonable progres s goals and establishing a long-term emissions management strategy for MANE-VU Class I areas. The modeling tool s utilized for these analyses include the Fifth-Genera tion NCAR / Penn State Mesoscale Model ( 

## MM5), SMOKE, CMAQ and REMSAD, and incorporat e tagging features that allow for the tracking of individual source regions or measures. Thes e tools have been evaluated a nd found to perform adequately relative to U.S. EPA modeling guidance.

As described below, in orde r for NESCAUM to process the Electric Generating Unit (EGU) emissions generated by the Integrated Planning Model ® 

## (IPM) procedures noted above, a series of intermediate steps were requi red to get the activit y and emission data in to the appropriate format for SMOKE processing.

3.2 Preparing IPM Output for Use in SMOKE Model

IPM can produce projections at the re gional, state, plant, or unit leve l. Data must be parsed to provide the unit level informati on required for chemical trans port modeling. Parsing involves

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

13 developing detailed unit le vel information from the model’s proj ections at the model plant level. ICF parsed the VISTASII_PC_1f data for use by the RPOs.

Further post-processing of IPM pa rsed output is needed to prep are the files for use by the SMOKE emissions processi ng model. The following sections de scribe the intermediate steps necessary to make these conversions. The first st ep is the augmentation of the IPM parsed output
files to include additional unit level character istics and pollutant estimates necessary for one atmosphere modeling. This step converts the IPM parsed data f iles into EPA’s National Emission Inventory Input Format (NIF). The second step is the additional conversion of these NIF files into the Inventory Data Analyzer (IDA) format required by the SMOKE emissions processor.

3.2.1 IPM to NIF

After running IPM, ICF provided an initial spreadsheet file c ontaining unit-level records for
both: (1) “existing” units (those currently in ope ration during the modeled base year) and (2) committed/planned or new generic aggregat es (new generic units expected to come
online or identified as needed to meet electric generation demand in a geographic area).

IPM parsed file records in clude unit and fuel type da ta; existing, retrofit (for SO 2 

## and NO
x 

## ), and separate NO
x 

## control information; annual SO 2 

## and NO
x 

## emissions and heat input; summer season (May-September) NO
x 

## and heat input; July day NO
x 

## and heat input; coal h eat input by coal type; nameplate capacity megawatt (MW), and State FIPS codes (Federal Information Processing codes used to identify geogra phic areas). Existing units also had county FIPS code, a unique plant identifier (ORISPL) and unit ID (also called boiler ID) (BLRID); gene ric units did not have
these data.

The processing of IPM parsed data to NIF format included estimating emissions not generated by IPM and adding control efficiencies, stack parame ters, latitude-longitude coordinates, and State identifiers (plant ID, point ID, stack ID, pro cess ID) from a series of lookup tables or by matching to individual units as configured in base year 2002 emission files (Pechan, 2005). Additionally, new generic units created by IPM we re sited in a county and given appropriate IDs. This processing is describe d in more detail below.

Generic Units: The new generic units and associated da ta were prepared by transforming the generic aggregates into units similar in size and fu el to existing units in terms of the available data. Generic aggregates were split into sma ller generic units based on their unit types and capacity. Each generic unit was provided a dummy ORIS unique plant and boiler ID, and were given a county FIPS code based on an algorithm that si ted each generic unit by assigning a sister plant that is in a county based on its attainment/nonattainment stat us. Within a State, existing plants (in county then ORIS plant c ode order) in attainment counties were used first as sister sites to new generic units (to obtain county locati on), followed by existing plants in PM nonattainment counties, followed by existing plants in 8-hour oz one nonattainment counties. No
States identified counties that should not be considered when siting new generic units, so this process was identical to the one used for EPA IPM post-pr ocessing under CAIR.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

14 SCCs were assigned to existing units using un it/fuel/firing/bottom ty pe data. SCCs were assigned to generic units using unit and fuel type information. Latitude-longitude coordinates were assigned, first using the EP A-provided data files, secondl y using an in-house contractor developed latitude-longitude file, and lastly us ing county centroids. These additional location files were only used when the data were not provi ded in the original 2002 base year files. Stack parameters were then assigned to each unit, fi rst using the EPA-provided data files, secondly using an in-house stack parameter file based on previous EIA-767 data, and lastly using an EPA
June 2003 SCC-based default stack parameter file. These data we re only used when the data were not provided in the 2002 base year files.

IPM does not calculate emissions for all pollutants necessary for regional haze modeling. Therefore additional data were required to estimate VOC, CO, filterable primary PM 10 

## and

PM 2.5 

## , PM condensable, and NH 3 

## emissions. Thus, ash and sulfur contents were assigned by first using 2002 EIA-767 values for existing units or SCC-based defaults; filterable PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## efficiencies were obt ained from the 2002 EGU NEI that were based on 2002 EIA-767 control data and the PM Calculator pr ogram (a default of 99.2 percent is used for coal units if necessary); fuel use was back calculated from the given heat input and a default SCC-based heat content; and emission factors were obtained from an EPA-approved emission factor file based on
AP-42 emission factors. Table 2 presents the SCC-based defa ult heat content and stack parameters used when actual data were not available. Table 3 (wor ksheet sccemfac100704 from MRPOpostprocdatafiles.xls, Pechan 2005) reflects emission factor s used to develop emission estimates of CO, VOC, filterable PM, and NH 3



## .

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

15 Table 2. SCC Default Heat Content and Stack Pa rameters from IPM to NIF Conversion.

Heat Content Height Diameter Temp Velocity SCC Fuel (Btu/SCC Unit) (ft) (ft) (degrees F) (ft/s)

10100201 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 603.2 19.8 281.2 76.5

10100202 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 509.7 14.6 226.0 62.0

10100203 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 491.6 16.6 278.4 80.5

10100204 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 225.0 0.6 67.2 2.4

10100211 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

10100212 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 445.6 17.4 275.2 77.6

10100217 Bituminous Coal 23.4286 399.3 10.8 245.6 40.1

10100221 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 983.0 22.8 350.0 110.0

10100222 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 468.5 16.0 254.7 65.6

10100223 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 446.8 15.9 308.0 93.6

10100224 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 255.5 10.0 251.3 15.3

10100226 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 495.8 18.9 259.2 91.2

10100238 Subbituminous Coal 17.8870 600.0 22.5 315.0 78.0 10100301 Lignite Coal 12.9149 427.5 22.3 232.8 74.2 10100302 Lignite Coal 12.9149 483.5 21.0 229.4 92.4 10100303 Lignite Coal 12.9149 462.0 21.7 271.3 72.5 10100317 Lignite Coal 12.9149 326.7 12.3 326.7 74.7

10100601 Natural Gas 1023.8846 263.9 10.3 236.0 46.9

10100801 Coke 27.4376 371.3 5.5 122.4 20.4

10102018 Waste Coal 12.0929 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

20100201 Natural Gas 1023.8846 62.0 10.0 585.3 61.3

20100301 Gasified Coal 1023.8846 62.0 10.0 585.3 61.3 Stack Parameters

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

16 Table 3. EPA-Approved Emission Factor File for CO, VOC, filte rable PM, and NH 3



## .

SCC FUEL COEF VOCEF PM10EF PM25EF NH3EF PMFLAG

10100201 BIT 0.5000 0.0400 2.6000 1.4800 0.030 A

10100202 BIT 0.5000 0.0600 2.3000 0.6000 0.030 A
10100203 BIT 0.5000 0.1100 0.2600 0.1100 0.030 A

10100204 BIT 5.0000 0.0500 13.2000 4.6000 0.030

10100211 BIT 0.5000 0.0400 2.6000 1.4800 0.030 A

10100212 BIT 0.5000 0.0600 2.3000 0.6000 0.030 A

10100217 BIT 18.0000 0.0500 12.4000 1.3640 0.030
10100221 SUB 0.5000 0.0400 2.6000 1.4800 0.030 A

10100222 SUB 0.5000 0.0600 2.3000 0.6000 0.030 A

10100223 SUB 0.5000 0.1100 0.2600 0.1100 0.030 A

10100224 SUB 5.0000 0.0500 13.2000 4.6000 0.030
10100226 SUB 0.5000 0.0600 2.3000 0.6000 0.030 A

10100238 SUB 18.0000 0.0500 16.1000 4.2000 0.030

10100301 LIG 0.2500 0.0700 1.8170 0.5214 0.030 A

10100302 LIG 0.6000 0.0700 2.3000 0.6600 0.030 A

10100303 LIG 0.6000 0.0700 0.8710 0.3690 0.030 A
10100317 LIG 0.1500 0.0300 12.0000 1.4000 0.030

10100601 NG 84.0000 5.5000 1.9000 1.9000 3.200

10100801 PC 0.6000 0.0700 7.9000 4.5000 0.397 A

10102018 WC 0.1500 0.0300 12.0000 1.4000 0.030
20100201 NG 83.8628 2.1477 1.9380 1.9380 6.560

20100301 IGCC 34.6500 2.2050 11.5500 11.5500 6.560

Notes:
1. SCCs beginning with 101002 (coal), 101003 (coal), 101008 (coke), or 101020 (waste coal), emission factors in LB/TON; SCCs beginning with 101006 (natural gas), 201002 (natural gas), or 201003 (IGCC), emission factors are in LB/E6FT3. 2. If PMFLAG = 'A', then multiply ash content with PM emission factor.

Source: Table derived from work sheet sccemfac100704 from MRPOpostpr ocdatafiles.xls, Pechan 2005.



## Condensable PM: To estimate total pr imary PM emissions, additional calculations were
conducted to derive condensable PM emissions from these sources. In MANE VU and VISTAS
PM condensable emissions were calculated based on factors derived from AP-42 defaults. In
MRPO no condensable emissions were estimated or included in the inventory. (Janssen, 2008) Table 4 (worksheet pmcdef fro m MRPOpostprocdatafiles.xls, Pechan 2005) shows these PM
condensable emission fact ors and SCC assignments.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

17 Table 4. EPA-Approved Condensable PM Emission Factor Assignment.

SCC PMCDEF (LB/E6BTU)

10100201, 10100202, 10100203, 10100211, 10100212, 10100221, 10100222, 10100223, 10100226, 10100301, 10100302, 10100303 0.0200 2



### 10100201, 10100202, 10100203, 10100211, 10100212, 10100221, 10100222,

10100223, 10100226, 10100301, 10100302, 10100303 1 

### (0.1 * sulfur content - 0.03) 3



### 10100204, 10100224 0.0400 10100217, 10100238, 10100317, 10102018 0.0100

10100601 0.0057
10100801 0.0100 20100201, 20100301 0.0047

Notes: 1. If the emission factor is less than 0.01, then it is set equal to 0.01.

2. AND there is either an SO 2 

### FGD or a PM scrubber (for MRPO post-processing); or AND there is an SO 2 

### wet FGD (for EPA post-processing).
3. AND there is any PM control other than a scrubber and there is no SO 2 

### control (for MRPO post-processing); or AND there is any control other than an SO 2 

### wet FGD (for EPA post-processing).

Source: Table derived from worksheet pmcdef from MRPOpostprocdataf iles.xls, Pechan 2005.



## Additional Pollutants : As noted above, in processing IPM parsed data to convert it to NIF format, emissions of additional pollutants were estimated. Emissions for 28 temporal-pollutant
combinations were estimated since there are seven pollutants (VOC, CO, primary PM 10 

## and

PM 2.5 

## , NH 3 

## , SO 2 

## and NO
x 

## ) and four temporal periods (annua l, summer season, winter season, July day).

Crosswalk Match to 2002 Inventory : The final step in the IPM to NIF conversion process was to
match the IPM unit IDs with the identifiers in the base year 2002 inventory for existing EGUs. A
crosswalk file was used to obtai n FIPS State and county, plant ID (within State and county), and point ID. If the FIPS St ate and county, plant ID and point ID were in the 2002 base year NIF tables, then the process ID a nd stack ID were obtained from th e NIF; otherwise, defaults, described above, were used.

The post-processed files were then provided in NIF 3.0 format. Two sets of tables were developed : “NIF files” for IPM units that had a crosswalk ma tch and were in the 2002 base year inventory, and “NoNIF files” fo r IPM units that were not in th e 2002 base year inventory (which included existing units with or wi thout a crosswalk match as well as generic units). Two special cases relating to the crosswalk match were handled as follows:

1. One-to-many match: At a given plant, if one IPM boiler ID was matched to more than one point ID, the boiler data were put on the first point ID records; records from the other point IDs were delete d from the relevant tables.

2. Many-to-one match: At a given plant, if more than one IPM boiler ID was matched to one point ID, all the boilers’ emissions (tons), th roughput (really heat input in MMBtu), and capacity (MW) were summed (“summed boiler”) and put on that point

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

18 ID’s records in the relevant tables. Th e values for stack parameters and latitudelongitude values were those from the first r ecord summed.

3.3 State Results – Phase II Augmented

Summarizing the results of the estimation of a dditional pollutants, Tabl e 5 presents additional pollutant augmented State level emission result s from the 2018 Inter-RPO CAIR Case IPM v. 2.1.9 fossil-only parsed file (VIS TASII_PC_1f with pollutant au gmentation; found in modeling
file ida_egu_18_basef_2453605.txt from VISTAS BaseF). A comparison of RPO totals for SO 2 

## and NO
x 

## shows that these are the same as presented in Table 1.

3.4 NIF to IDA

The main purpose of the SMOK E conversion task was to conve rt EGU emission inventories provided in NIF format into th e IDA format required by the SMOKE model for the criteria pollutants VOC, NO
x 

## , CO, SO 2 

## , PM 10 

## , PM 2.5 

## , and NH 3 

## . Annual and seasonal emissions were taken directly from the NIF structured inventor ies with no alternate temporal calculations performed (e.g., estimate seasonal emissions from annua l or annual from seasonal). The temporal
allocation module of the SMOKE e missions processor was intended to be used to further define temporal distribution of these emissions.

No quality assurance (QA) related to the reported values in the NIF files was conducted (e.g., it was assumed that reported emission levels we re correct) and therefore the QA focus was to maintain the integrity of the mass files in the conversion to IDA.

Each set of NIF structured data had a unique set of relational ta bles necessary to maintain the information required in each source sector ba sed on its reporting requ irements. Conversion scripts to read the information from each of thes e relational data sets and convert them to the IDA structures required by this task were impl emented by Alpine (Alp ine, 2006). Prior to and after the conversion from NIF to IDA, a list of emission summary reports was developed to check that the emissions input into the conversi on process were the same as output into the IDA
formatted files.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

19 Table 5. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTAS II_PC_1f with Pollutant Augmentation. Modeling file ida_egu_18_basef_2453605.txt from VISTAS Base F. (fossil-only)

State RPO NOx SO2 VOC CO PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3 Connecticut MANE-VU 3,418 6,697 145 9,837 959 927 341
Delaware MANE-VU 12,341 35,442 117 1,183 2,950 2,438 76

District Of Columbia MANE-VU 103 83 5 154 104 99 12
Maine MANE-VU 1,827 5,436 53 4,057 296 279 139 Maryland MANE-VU 14,709 28,065 575 11,831 8,253 6,433 435
Massachusetts MANE-VU 18,157 17,486 484 13,860 3,918 3,233 1,059 New Hampshire MANE-VU 3,089 7,469 73 1,697 2,268 2,156 124 New Jersey MANE-VU 13,636 32,495 352 7,611 4,017 3,515 564 New York MANE-VU 24,376 51,445 758 22,242 11,031 9,343 1,472 Pennsylvania MANE-VU 82,881 135,946 1,920 41,445 31,580 23,756 1,790 Rhode Island MANE-VU 576 55 42 1,627 157 156 127

Vermont MANE-VU 105 35 3 117 26 25 9 MANE-VU Total 175,218 320,651 4,528 115,659 65,558 52,360 6,148
Alabama VISTAS 41,714 190,029 1,599 27,888 20,401 15,936 2,009 Florida VISTAS 56,506 139,526 2,027 58,982 24,804 18,403 3,948 Georgia VISTAS 56,180 178,196 1,940 33,040 25,929 19,087 2,374 Kentucky VISTAS 64,099 229,596 1,623 17,103 24,659 18,813 782 Mississippi VISTAS 8,895 27,226 511 12,228 7,270 4,358 918 North Carolina VISTAS 57,774 102,217 1,232 14,386 31,797 26,551 847
South Carolina VISTAS 46,318 118,584 932 11,263 26,740 22,629 793
Tennessee VISTAS 29,873 112,343 922 7,391 15,008 12,988 449 Virginia VISTAS 43,144 80,602 863 16,482 19,652 17,300 881 West Virginia VISTAS 51,208 124,464 1,447 12,946 23,538 16,968 721 VISTAS Total 455,711 1,302,784 13,096 211,709 219,798 173,034 13,722
Illinois MRPO 71,233 241,136 2,229 17,868 32,650 30,132 1,152
Indiana MRPO 95,376 376,864 2,105 19,416 35,082 27,835 1,274 Michigan MRPO 98,685 398,562 1,623 17,522 38,902 34,276 1,091
Ohio MRPO 83,129 215,501 2,254 23,832 42,754 33,323 1,773 Wisconsin MRPO 45,701 155,369 1,101 11,901 15,629 14,246 626 MRPO Total 394,124 1,387,432 9,312 90,539 165,016 139,813 5,915
Arkansas CENRAP 33,097 82,605 696 11,429 3,897 3,326 814
Iowa CENRAP 51,119 147,305 770 8,759 10,033 8,615 569 Kansas CENRAP 83,333 81,486 798 7,203 8,520 6,807 461
Louisiana CENRAP 30,432 74,263 660 11,043 3,966 3,590 919 Minnesota CENRAP 41,029 85,847 674 5,563 8,162 7,034 343
Missouri CENRAP 77,660 280,887 1,579 13,165 18,456 16,769 800 Nebraska CENRAP 50,781 73,629 450 3,590 2,296 1,915 217
Oklahoma CENRAP 76,048 113,680 1,008 28,182 5,561 4,840 1,355
Texas CENRAP 153,837 339,433 4,988 102,583 38,952 31,631 6,424 CENRAP Total 597,336 1,279,135 11,622 191,518 99,842 84,528 11,902
Arizona WRAP 81,858 60,640 1,170 29,037 11,515 9,644 2,189 California WRAP 23,767 5,447 1,496 56,188 5,442 5,337 4,402
Colorado WRAP 70,171 87,163 667 12,139 4,751 4,166 609 Idaho WRAP 718 0 36 1,398 113 113 109
Montana WRAP 38,504 22,066 326 3,035 7,217 4,636 193 Nevada WRAP 47,404 31,172 479 9,862 5,244 4,315 750
New Mexico WRAP 74,010 52,916 554 5,991 13,435 7,637 388 North Dakota WRAP 71,711 108,645 784 9,937 5,670 4,757 324 Oregon WRAP 11,330 10,034 276 9,322 1,311 1,305 722 South Dakota WRAP 14,574 12,085 110 536 362 297 33
Utah WRAP 60,782 37,819 423 3,523 6,459 4,881 211 Washington WRAP 26,379 12,236 451 11,848 3,780 3,192 898 Wyoming WRAP 81,182 40,265 678 5,672 8,537 7,116 341 WRAP Total 602,389 480,488 7,449 158,487 73,834 57,395 11,170 National Total 2,224,778 4,770,490 46,007 767,912 624,049 507,129 48,857 Augmented Pollutants IPM Generated Annual Emissions (Tons)

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

20 4 MODIFICATIONS BY OTHER REGIONS

4.1 Emission Control Modifications within VISTAS, MRPO, and CENRAP

State and local agencies and i nvited stakeholders from VISTAS , MRPO, and CENRAP reviewed
the results of the Inter-RPO Phase II set of IPM runs. These stakeholders primarily reviewed and
commented on the IPM results with respect to IPM decisions on NO
x 

## post-combustion controls
and SO 2 

## scrubbers and provided additional in formation on when and where new SO 2 

## and NO
x 

## controls were planned to come online based on the best availa ble data from state rules, enforcement agreements, compliance plans, pe rmits, and discussions /commitments from individual companies. They also reviewed the IPM results to verify that known and existing
controls and emission rates were properly reflected in th e IPM runs. After considering comments, adjustments to the IPM results were ma de to specific units using any new information they had as part of the permitting process or ot her contact with the industry that indicated which
units would install controls as a result of CAIR and when these new controls would come on-line (MACTEC, 2007; MRPO 2006; ENVIRO N 2007).

As described in the following sec tion, some entities specified change s to the controls assigned by
IPM to reflect their best estimates of emission control levels. These changes typically involved either 1) adding selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or scrubber controls to units where IPM did not predict SCR or scrubber contro ls, or 2) removing IPM-assigned SCR or scrubber controls at units where the commenting entity indicated there we re no firm plans for cont rols at those units.

At this point in the process MANE-VU decided not to make any changes to the northeastern state IPM output regardless of state knowledge of discrepancies with actual conditions. MANE-VU determined that IPM provided a reasonable estimate of the imp act of the CAIR cap and trade program consistent with methods used by EPA, and planners were concerned that adjustments
would not reflect the allocation of ALL allowed emissions under CAIR.

In MANE-VU’s final modeling, many of the cha nges made by the other RPOs were included, but due to the timing of the release of revised data, the location with respect to the modeling domain, and need to progress with modeling, MANE-VU did not incorporate changes reflected
in the final CENRAP EGU files.

4.2 Emission Factor and Cont rol Modifications for VI STAS Emission Sources

VISTAS reviewed the PM and NH 3 

## emissions from its States’ EGUs provided after the original
IPM to NIF conversation conducted for the RPOs a nd identified significantly higher emissions in
2009/2018 than in 2002. VISTAS determined this conversion used a set of PM and NH 3 

## emission factors that we re “the most recent EPA approved uncontrolled emissi on factors” for estimating 2009/2018 EGU emissions but were most likely not the same e mission factors used by States for estimating thes e emissions in 2002. Thus, the emission increase from 2002 to 2009/2018 was simply an artifact of the change in emission fact ors, not anything to do with changes in activity or control t echnology application. During th is review, VISTAS additionally
identified an inconsistent use of SCCs for de termining emission factors between the base and future years.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

21 Documentation (Alpine, 2005a, b) indicates that VISTAS adjusted the 2 002 base year emissions inventory to account for these discrepancies in base year and future year PM and NH 3 

## emission factor use. Using the latest “EPA-approved” uncontrolled emi ssion factors by SCC, Alpine
utilized data collected under EPA’s Consolidat ed Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) or data reported by VISTAS. Al pine used reported annual heat in put, fuel throughput, heat, ash, and
sulfur content to estimate annual uncontrolled e missions for units identified as output by IPM. This step was conducted for non-CEM pollutants (CO, VOC, PM, and NH 3 

## ) only. For PM emissions, the condensable component of emissi ons was calculated and added to the resulting PM primary estimations. The resulting emissions we re then adjusted by any control efficiency factors reported in the CERR or VISTAS data collection effort . The second adjustment was to the future year inventories. Al pine updated the SCCs in the futu re year inventory to assign the same base year SCC. Using the same methods as describe d for the 2002 revisions, those nonIPM generated pollutants we re estimated using IPM predicted fu el characteristics and base year 2002 SCC assignments.

In addition to the changes to the emission factor assignments, SCC, and IPM-assigned controls, VISTAS also specified other changes to the IPM results or converted IPM to NIF files. Comments on changes in stack parameters from the 2002 inventory were implemented in the
converted files for the 2018 invent ory. Changes to stack parameters were also made in cases
where new controls were scheduled to be in stalled. In cases where an emission unit was projected to have an SO 2 

## scrubber by 2018, some States were able to provide revised stack parameters for some units based on design feat ures for the new control system. Other units projected to install scrubbers by 2018 were not far enough along in the design process to have specific design details. For those units, VIST AS made the following assumptions: 1) the scrubber is a wet scrubber; 2) k eep the current stack height the same; 3) keep the current flow rate the same, and 4) change the stack exit te mperature to 169 degrees F (this is the virtual temperature derived from a wet temperatur e of 130 degrees F) (M ACTEC, 2007). VISTAS determined that exit temperature (wet) of 130 degrees F +/- 5 degrees F is representative of different size units and wet scrubber technology.

4.3 Emission Inventory Replacem ent within WRAP Domain

During the development of their EGU emission forecast, the western states RPO (WRAP)
conducted an exercise where IPM was not used to prepare emission estimates from EGU sources. Using capacity f actor adjustments and emission cont rol assumptions, WRAP developed
a forecast of EGU emissions based on its initia l 2002 base year inventory (ERG, 2006). This revised forecast was used by many of the RPOs and replaced the emissions generated for the domain by IPM. This change by WRAP is refl ected in the difference in State emission totals
between Tables 5 and 6. As WRAP is outside the MANE VU modeling do main, this change was not reflected in MANE-VU modeling. MANE-VU did not change its boundary conditions to reflect this change.

4.4 Eliminating Double Counting of EGU Units

An additional set of procedures was used by MANE-VU and VISTAS to avoid double counting of EGU emissions in the 2018 point sour ce inventory (MACTEC, 2006, 2007). Since each

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

22 RPO’s 2002 emissions inventor y file contained both EGUs and non-EGU point sources, and EGU emissions were projected using IPM, it wa s necessary to split the 2002 point source file into two components. The first component cont ained those emission units accounted for in the IPM forecasts. The second component contained a ll other point sources not accounted for in
IPM.

As described in the previous section, 2018 NIF files for EGUs were prepared from the IPM parsed files. All IPM matched uni ts were initially removed from the 2018 point source inventory
to create the non-EGU inventor y (which was projected to 2018 using non-EGU growth and control factors). This was done on a unit-by-un it basis based on a cross-reference table that
matched IPM emission unit iden tifiers (ORISPL plant code a nd BLRID emission unit code) to NIF emission unit identifiers (FIPSST state co de, FIPSCNTY county code, State Plant ID, State Point ID). When there was a match between th e IPM ORISPL/BLRID a nd the emission unit ID, the unit was assigned to the EGU inventory; a ll other emission units were assigned to the nonEGU inventory.

If an emission unit was contained in the NI F files created from the IPM output, the corresponding unit was removed fro m the initial 2018 point source inventory. For VISTAS, the NIF 2018 EGU files from the IPM pars ed files were then merged with the non-EGU 2018 files to create a complete 2018 point source scenario.

Next, several ad-hoc QA/QC queries were done to verify that there was no double-counting of
emissions in the EGU an d non-EGU inventories:

• The IPM parsed files were reviewed to identif y EGUs accounted for in IPM. This list of emission units was compared to the non-E GU inventory derived from the IPM-NIF crossreference table to verify that units accounted for in IPM were not double-counted in the non-EGU inventory. As a result of this comparison, a few ad justments were made in the
cross-reference table to add emission units fo r plants to ensure these units accounted for in IPM were moved to the EGU inventory.

• The non-EGU inventory was further reviewed to identify remaining emission units with
an Standard Industrial Classi fication (SIC) code of “4911 El ectrical Services” or Source
Classification Code of “1-01-xxx-xx Extern al Combustion Boiler, Electric Generation”. The list of sources meeting these selection crit eria were compared to the IPM parsed file
to ensure that these units were not double-counted.

• VISTAS invited various stake holder groups to review the 20 18 point source inventory to verify whether there was any double countin g of EGU emissions. In some instances, corrections were provided where an emission unit was double counted.

4.5 Preliminary Results fr om Phase II Additi onal Modifications

Table 6 summarizes the Base G emissions invent ory for EGUs, presenting State level emission
results from the 2018 Inter-RPO CAIR Case IP M v. 2.1.9 parsed file modified by VISTAS,

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

23 MRPO, and WRAP per the methods noted in the a bove sections. Note that no changes occurred
to the MANE-VU state emissions as a result of these changes.

Table 6. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTAS Base G Modeling file ptinv_egu_2018_11sep2006.txt. Based on 2018 VISTASII_ PC_1f (fossil-only) with adjustments from VISTAS, MRPO, and WRAP.

State RPO NOx SO2 VOC CO PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3
Connecticut MANE-VU 3,418 6,697 145 9,836 959 927 341 Delaware MANE-VU 12,341 35,442 117 1,183 2,950 2,438 76

District Of Columbia MANE-VU 103 83 5 154 104 99 12 Maine MANE-VU 1,827 5,436 53 4,057 296 279 139 Maryland MANE-VU 14,709 28,065 575 11,831 8,253 6,433 435 Massachusetts MANE-VU 18,157 17,486 484 13,860 3,917 3,233 1,059 New Hampshire MANE-VU 3,089 7,469 73 1,697 2,268 2,156 124 New Jersey MANE-VU 13,636 32,495 352 7,611 4,017 3,515 564
New York MANE-VU 24,376 51,445 758 22,242 11,031 9,343 1,471 Pennsylvania MANE-VU 82,881 135,946 1,919 41,446 31,580 23,756 1,790
Rhode Island MANE-VU 576 55 42 1,627 157 156 127

Vermont MANE-VU 105 35 3 117 26 25 9 MANE-VU Total 175,219 320,651 4,528 115,660 65,558 52,360 6,148
Alabama VISTAS 62,860 135,782 1,620 21,611 7,385 4,380 1,033
Florida VISTAS 56,827 133,037 1,857 42,573 9,287 6,288 2,665 Georgia VISTAS 69,308 226,477 1,805 35,584 18,217 11,319 1,676 Kentucky VISTAS 59,740 211,225 1,344 12,125 6,194 4,067 436 Mississippi VISTAS 10,455 15,143 1,055 11,822 7,007 6,853 545
North Carolina VISTAS 56,526 96,402 1,147 16,376 32,676 26,014 608 South Carolina VISTAS 50,068 87,202 860 13,078 28,110 24,454 578
Tennessee VISTAS 30,008 112,353 886 7,126 15,861 13,321 241 Virginia VISTAS 60,615 109,391 921 14,017 13,505 11,757 553 West Virginia VISTAS 51,177 115,322 1,382 11,896 6,344 3,643 177 VISTAS Total 507,583 1,242,334 12,877 186,205 144,586 112,094 8,513
Illinois MRPO 71,233 241,136 2,229 17,868 32,649 30,132 1,152 Indiana MRPO 95,376 351,858 2,105 19,416 35,081 27,835 1,274 Michigan MRPO 78,605 288,006 1,623 17,521 38,902 34,276 1,091 Ohio MRPO 83,129 215,501 2,254 23,832 42,753 33,322 1,772
Wisconsin MRPO 45,701 155,369 1,101 11,901 15,629 14,246 626 MRPO Total 374,044 1,251,871 9,311 90,539 165,015 139,812 5,915
Arkansas CENRAP 33,097 82,605 696 11,429 3,897 3,326 814
Iowa CENRAP 51,119 147,305 770 8,758 10,033 8,615 569
Kansas CENRAP 83,333 81,486 798 7,203 8,520 6,807 461 Louisiana CENRAP 30,432 74,263 660 11,043 3,966 3,590 919
Minnesota CENRAP 41,029 85,847 674 5,563 8,162 7,035 343 Missouri CENRAP 77,660 280,887 1,579 13,165 18,456 16,769 799
Nebraska CENRAP 50,781 73,629 450 3,590 2,296 1,914 217
Oklahoma CENRAP 76,048 113,680 1,008 28,182 5,561 4,840 1,355
Texas CENRAP 153,837 339,433 4,988 102,581 38,952 31,630 6,424 CENRAP Total 597,336 1,279,135 11,622 191,515 99,842 84,527 11,901
Arizona WRAP 59,774 55,941 724 17,806 2,811 634 630 California WRAP 17,537 1,528 2,558 31,173 1,219 1,059 0 Colorado WRAP 77,113 60,914 1,465 18,939 3,138 307 537
Idaho WRAP 2,236 1,683 50 3,283 335 87 0
Montana WRAP 44,733 31,303 565 11,818 1,796 247 13
Nevada WRAP 54,300 22,118 1,570 10,598 4,230 768 903 New Mexico WRAP 32,925 17,796 695 10,976 794 627 43
North Dakota WRAP 82,741 152,828 909 13,647 3,958 2,645 383 Oregon WRAP 15,742 15,096 474 5,753 1,288 323 219
South Dakota WRAP 17,681 13,522 118 689 247 217 52 Utah WRAP 76,136 41,394 597 17,150 4,637 2,000 1,350 Washington WRAP 16,884 7,011 249 4,008 1,474 1,027 12 Wyoming WRAP 104,142 96,745 1,147 18,871 10,445 7,411 404 WRAP Total 601,942 517,879 11,122 164,711 36,371 17,353 4,547 National Total 2,256,124 4,611,869 49,460 748,629 511,371 406,146 37,024 Annual Emissions (Tons)

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

24 4.6 Revised Results – VISTAS Base G2 Adjustment

VISTAS further refined their fu ture predictions based on furthe r state input. The resulting modeling file was called the Base G2 inventory. Table 7 presents State level emission results
from the Base G2 2018 Inter-RPO CAIR Case IPM v. 2.1.9 parsed fi le modified by VISTAS.

Some states specified changes to the controls a ssigned by IPM to reflect their best estimates of
emission control levels. These ch anges typically involved either 1) adding selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or scrubber cont rols to units where IPM did not predict SCR or scrubber controls, or 2) removing IPM- assigned SCR or scrubber controls at units where the commenting entity indicated their were no firm plans for cont rols at those units. These changes were based
on those states’ best available information a bout where and when emi ssions controls were expected to be installed, as well as informati on concerning IPM-predicte d plant closures that were deemed unlikely to occur. In comparing Table 7 with Table 6, it can be seen that the changes included in the Base G2 i nventory were requested by the st ates of Florida, Georgia, and
North Carolina.

Note that no changes were made at this time by the MANE-VU states. The net effect of these changes was to reduce emissions of SO 2 

## relative to either Table 5 or Table 6.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

25 Table 7. State Level Emission Summary; 2018 VISTAS Base G2 Modeling file egu_18_vistas_g2_20feb2007.txt. Based on 2018 VISTASII_PC_1f (fossil-only) with adjustments from VIST AS, MRPO, and WRAP.

State RPO NOx SO2 VOC CO PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3
Connecticut MANE-VU 3,418 6,697 145 9,836 959 927 341 Delaware MANE-VU 12,341 35,442 117 1,183 2,950 2,438 76

District Of Columbia MANE-VU 103 83 5 154 104 99 12 Maine MANE-VU 1,827 5,436 53 4,057 296 279 139 Maryland MANE-VU 14,709 28,065 575 11,831 8,253 6,433 435 Massachusetts MANE-VU 18,157 17,486 484 13,860 3,917 3,233 1,059 New Hampshire MANE-VU 3,089 7,469 73 1,697 2,268 2,156 124 New Jersey MANE-VU 13,636 32,495 352 7,611 4,017 3,515 564 New York MANE-VU 24,376 51,445 758 22,242 11,031 9,343 1,471 Pennsylvania MANE-VU 82,881 135,946 1,919 41,446 31,580 23,756 1,790 Rhode Island MANE-VU 576 55 42 1,627 157 156 127

Vermont MANE-VU 105 35 3 117 26 25 9 MANE-VU Total 175,219 320,651 4,528 115,660 65,558 52,360 6,148
Alabama VISTAS 62,860 135,782 1,620 21,611 7,385 4,380 1,033 Florida VISTAS 58,341 139,200 1,904 42,947 9,355 6,331 2,665 Georgia VISTAS 69,308 75,051 1,805 35,584 18,217 11,319 1,676 Kentucky VISTAS 59,740 211,225 1,344 12,125 6,194 4,067 436 Mississippi VISTAS 10,455 15,143 1,055 11,822 7,007 6,853 545 North Carolina VISTAS 56,526 102,680 1,147 16,376 32,676 26,014 608 South Carolina VISTAS 50,068 87,202 860 13,078 28,110 24,454 578 Tennessee VISTAS 30,008 112,353 886 7,126 15,861 13,321 241 Virginia VISTAS 60,615 109,391 921 14,017 13,505 11,757 553 West Virginia VISTAS 51,177 105,932 1,382 11,896 6,344 3,643 177 VISTAS Total 509,098 1,093,959 12,923 186,579 144,654 112,137 8,513
Illinois MRPO 71,233 241,136 2,229 17,868 32,649 30,132 1,152 Indiana MRPO 95,376 351,858 2,105 19,416 35,081 27,835 1,274 Michigan MRPO 78,605 288,006 1,623 17,521 38,902 34,276 1,091 Ohio MRPO 83,129 215,501 2,254 23,832 42,753 33,322 1,772 Wisconsin MRPO 45,701 155,369 1,101 11,901 15,629 14,246 626 MRPO Total 374,044 1,251,871 9,311 90,539 165,015 139,812 5,915 Arkansas CENRAP 33,097 82,605 696 11,429 3,897 3,326 814 Iowa CENRAP 51,119 147,305 770 8,758 10,033 8,615 569 Kansas CENRAP 83,333 81,486 798 7,203 8,520 6,807 461 Louisiana CENRAP 30,432 74,263 660 11,043 3,966 3,590 919 Minnesota CENRAP 41,029 85,847 674 5,563 8,162 7,035 343 Missouri CENRAP 77,660 280,887 1,579 13,165 18,456 16,769 799 Nebraska CENRAP 50,781 73,629 450 3,590 2,296 1,914 217 Oklahoma CENRAP 76,048 113,680 1,008 28,182 5,561 4,840 1,355 Texas CENRAP 153,837 339,433 4,988 102,581 38,952 31,630 6,424 CENRAP Total 597,336 1,279,135 11,622 191,515 99,842 84,527 11,901 Arizona WRAP 59,774 55,941 724 17,806 2,811 634 630 California WRAP 17,537 1,528 2,558 31,173 1,219 1,059 0 Colorado WRAP 77,113 60,914 1,465 18,939 3,138 307 537 Idaho WRAP 2,236 1,683 50 3,283 335 87 0 Montana WRAP 44,733 31,303 565 11,818 1,796 247 13 Nevada WRAP 54,300 22,118 1,570 10,598 4,230 768 903 New Mexico WRAP 32,925 17,796 695 10,976 794 627 43 North Dakota WRAP 82,741 152,828 909 13,647 3,958 2,645 383 Oregon WRAP 15,742 15,096 474 5,753 1,288 323 219 South Dakota WRAP 17,681 13,522 118 689 247 217 52 Utah WRAP 76,136 41,394 597 17,150 4,637 2,000 1,350 Washington WRAP 16,884 7,011 249 4,008 1,474 1,027 12 Wyoming WRAP 104,142 96,745 1,147 18,871 10,445 7,411 404 WRAP Total 601,942 517,879 11,122 164,711 36,371 17,353 4,547 National Total 2,257,639 4,463,494 49,506 749,003 511,439 406,189 37,024 Annual Emissions (Tons)

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

26 5 ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENTS BY NORT HEASTERN STATES AND MODELERS
FOR REGIONAL HAZE SIP MODELING

5.1 Introduction

MANE VU used the G2 inventory as the basis for further adjustments to incorporate MANE-VU state changes and also to represent the MANE VU control strategy for key EGUs. These modifications resulted in a) SO 2 

## emissions reductions at one MA NE-VU EGU source subject to Best Available Retrofit Technolog y (BART) requirements, 2) e missions increases in MANE-VU
to reflect states’ best es timates that some sources predicted by IPM to be closed would continue to operate and information about where and when emission controls would or would not be installed, 3) SO 2 

## emissions reductions at key EGUs (or alternative facilities) to reflect the MANE-VU EGU strategy, and 4) increases in SO 2 

## emissions to estimate th e effect of emissions trading under the CAIR program. Each of these is explained below.

5.2 Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART)

To assess the impacts of the implementation of the BART provisions of the Regional Haze Rule, NESCAUM included estimated reductions anticipa ted for BART-eligible facilities not covered by CAIR in the MANE-VU region in the 2018 CMAQ modeling analysis. A survey of state staff indicated that eight units would likely be cont rolled under BART alone. State-provided potential control technologies and levels of control for these sources we re incorporated into the 2018 emission inventory projections used in MANE-VU’s March 2008 mo deling run (NESCAUM, 2008b). The eight BART-eligible un its included one EGU point source, which is located in Maine (Wyman Station).

5.3 MANE-VU State Modifica tions of IPM Results

Previously, during development of the Base G and Base G2 inventories, MANE-VU states had relied on the RPO IPM model results (Base F) w ithout revisions. In 2007, the MANE-VU states decided that they should revise the estimates, as other RPOs had done, to reflect their best estimates of future source opera tions and controls. State and re gional staff reviewed and revised the IPM results with respect to when and where new SO 2 

## controls were planned to come online. Modifications were based on state rules, enfo rcement agreements, compliance plans, permits,
and commitments from indi vidual companies. States reviewed the IPM results to verify that known and existing controls and e mission rates were properly reflect ed in the IPM results. In addition, states noted that some units predicte d by IPM to close were very unlikely to cease operation.

The net effect of these adjustments was an increase in SO 2 

## emissions in the MANE-VU region as
a whole. In Delaware SO 2 

## emissions decreased due to controls on a major source. Emissions in Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Rhode Island, and Vermont remained the same as predicted by RPO IPM 2.1.9 (B ase F). Emi ssions of SO 2 

## in other MANE-VU states increased. No changes were made in e missions of other pollutants.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

27 5.4 MANE-VU EGU Strategy

MANE-VU states have recognized that SO 2 

## emissions from power plan ts are the single largest contributing sector to visibility impairment in the North east’s Class I areas . Sulfate formed through atmospheric processes from SO 2 

## emissions are responsible for over half the mass and approximately 70-80 percent of the extinction on the worst visibility days (NESCAUM, 2006a, and b). The emissions from pow er plants dominate the SO 2 

## inventory.

A modeling analysis was conducted to identify thos e EGUs with the greates t impact on visibility in MANE-VU. As part of the MANE VU Contribution Assessment, two MANE-VU modeling centers undertook CALPUFF modeling to identify th e top 100 stacks that im pacted three of the
MANE VU Class I areas in the base year, 2002. These three ar eas are Acadia, Brigantine and Lye Brook. Details of the modeling are pr ovided in Appendix D of the Contribution Assessment. (NESCAUM, 2006a) The 100 top stacks fo r each Class I area are listed in Tables 10 and 20 from Appendix D “Dispersion Model T echniques” of the Contribution Assessment.

The two modeling centers used 2002 U.S. EPA Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) data reported by the power companies, which is stack based rather than emission unit based. A power plant may have several stacks. Each stack may vent emissions from one or more units at the plant. The two modeling centers also used di fferent meteorological data—one
used data from the MM5 model and the other used National Weather Service observation-based meteorology.

There are differences between re sults from the two centers because of the differences in meteorological input data and also because of rounding when summing annual emissions. As a result the MM5-based modeling identified some stacks as being in the top 100 impacting a
MANE-VU Class I area that were not identified by the obser vation-based modeling, and vice versa. For purposes of identifying key stack s, all stacks on either list were included.

MARAMA combined the lists of the top 100 E GU stacks in Tables 10 and 20 from Appendix D
of the Contribution Assessment a nd eliminated both duplications a nd stacks that were outside the MANE-VU consultation area. (The consultation area includes stat es contributing at least 2% of
the sulfate monitored at MANE-VU Class I areas in 2002.) This process resulted in 167 unique stacks impacting one or more of the three MANE -VU Class I areas. The use of stacks rather
than units or facilities was chosen as more cons istent with the results of the modeling presented
in the Contribution Assessment. The Contri bution Assessment Appendix D tables did not identify the units or facilities that were m odeled, only providing a CEMS Identification number.
MARAMA used information contai ned in IPM input files to matc h up the plant name and type where the stack was located. The resulting list of 167 stacks is found in Appendix A of this
report.

MANE-VU asked states in the consultation ar ea to pursue 90 percent control on all units emitting from those stacks by 2018. MANE-VU recognized that this level of control may not be
feasible in all cases. NESCAUM modelers inco rporated State comment s gathered during the

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

28 inter-RPO consultation process in es timating the impact of this stra tegy on visibility at Class I areas. This process is desc ribed below in Section 5.5.

5.5 Implementation of MANE-VU Co ntrol Strategy for Key EGUs

As part of the MANE-VU strategy to improve visibility, MANE-V U asked states to pursue a 90 percent reduction in SO 2 

## emissions from the 167 EGU stacks id entified as described in Section 5.4 and listed in Appendix A. MARAMA gather ed information from MANE-VU, MRPO, and VISTAS states and regional staf f to obtain information about an ticipated emissions changes.

State and local agencies and individual stak eholders from MANE-VU, MRPO and VISTAS
reviewed and revised the IP M results with respect to controls planned to come online. They also
reviewed the IPM results to ve rify that known and existing cont rols and emission rates were properly reflected in the IPM runs. In addition, commenters noted that some units predicted by
IPM to be shutdown would not shutdown.

Adjustments to the IPM results we re made to specific units usi ng information states had obtained as part of the permitting process or other cont act with the industry that indicated which units
would install controls as a re sult of CAIR and when these ne w controls would come on-line (Koerber, 2007; VISTAS 2007). In general, the changes at specific EGUs provided by VISTAS reflected their Base G2 inventory, and, as di scussed with MRPO, the changes NESCAUM made
to emissions from sources in the MRPO were c onsistent with sources where controls were predicted in EPA’s IPM 3.0 run for 2018, since MRPO modeling re lied on IPM 3.0. In addition to the 167 stacks, MANE-VU incorporated further corrections to source em issions as requested by VISTAS states at the follo wing locations: North Caroli na (Cliffside), South Carolina (Jefferies), Kentucky (Spurlock), and Vi rginia (Chesapeake and Clinch River). .

NESCAUM determined the desired emissions leve ls for the 167 key stacks based on a 90 percent
reduction in continuous emissions monitoring data from 2002. This established a target emissions level for the region fr om those stacks. NE SCAUM compared these levels with the information provided by the states for those sources. In each region, predicted 2018 emissions exceeded the target level. Therefore, emissions reductions from other sources were considered in order to meet the target emissions reductions for the regi on.(both within MANE-VU and in other RPOs). This resulted in a net decrease in emissions in all three a ffected RPOs. Emissions
of SO 2 

## would have decreased by over 14,000 tons per year in MANE-VU, over 304,000 tons per year in the Midwest, and over 197,000 tons per year in th e VISTAS region.

However, MANE-VU planners r ecognized that CAIR allows emissions trading, and that
reductions at one unit could be o ffset increases at another unit within the CAIR region. Because
most states do not restrict tr ading, MANE-VU decided that emi ssions should be increased to represent the implementation of the strategy for the 167 stacks within the limits of the CAIR program. Therefore, NESCAUM in creased the emissions from states subject to the CAIR cap and trade program. For MANE-VU, 75,809 tons were added back, leaving total regional emissions from the MANE-VU regi on greater than the original Inter-RPO IPM-based estimate but consistent with state projections. The rema ining 440,541 tons added back were allocated to

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

29 VISTAS and MRPO based on the fraction of their contribution to the total SO 2 

## emissions. The additional emissions correspond to an increase of 20.5 percent, with a total of 223,856 tons added to MRPO and 216,685 added to VISTAS.

Table 8 shows the emissions diffe rence between the results of two IPM runs and the modeling inventories used by three Regional Planning Or ganizations (RPOs). VI STAS used Base G2, MANE-VU used the March 2008 Modeling Inventory, and MR PO used IPM 3.0..

Table 8. Comparison of Regional SO 2 

## Emissions Estimates. (1000 tons per year)

MANE-VU MRPO VISTAS TOTAL

RPO 2.1.9 (VISTASII_PC_1f) (fossil only) 321 1,387 1,303 3,011
Reductions made by VISTAS and MRPO (Base G2) 0 -136 -209 -344

Net additional changes made by MANE-VU 66 24 222 311

MANE-VU March 2008 Modeling Inventory (fossil only) 387 1,276 1,316 2,978

MANE-VU minus RPO 2.1.9 (negative numbers mean MANE-VU's modeling inventory was less than RPO 2.1.9) 66 -112 13 -33

EPA 3.0 (fossil only) 421 1,328 1,458 3,207

RPO 2.1.9 minus EPA 3.0 (negative number means RPO 2.1.9 was less than EPA 3.0) -100 59 -155 -196

MANE-VU 3/08 minus EPA 3.0 (negative numbers mean MANE-VU's modeling inventory was less than EPA 3.0) -34 -53 -142 -229



## The intent of the MANE-VU modelers’ final EGU emissions adjustments was to retain the same level of emissions as predicted by the RPO CAIR IPM run for the three re gions together, but to modify the locations of the em issions to better reflect the st ates’ estimates and to achieve reductions at the 167 stacks identifie++d as impor tant contributors to regional haze at MANEVU Class I areas. As s hown in Table 8, above, the MANE-VU adjustments resulted in total emissions from the three regions being less than the SO 2 

## emissions predicted by the RPO 2.1.9 IPM run but greater than emissions in the G2 inventory used by VISTAS modelers. In both the MANE-VU and VISTAS regions, the MANE-VU Modeling Inventory is greater than the
VISTAS/Inter-RPO IPM r un and in MRPO it is smaller. Resu lts from IPM 3.0 also are provided for comparison, and are uniformly greater than the MANE-VU Modeling I nventory for EGUs.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

30 All future EGU emissions esti mates involve uncertainty. MA NE-VU believes its process of adding back emissions resulted in a reasonable, conservative estimate of the implementation of the MANE-VU request for a 90% re duction at key EGU facilities.

5.6 State Results – Northeas tern State Adjustments

Table 9 presents State level emi ssion results as modified by th e Northeastern States per the
methods noted in the above sections. This tabl e summarizes the input da ta used in the MANEVU 2018 March 2008 Modeling run as documented in NESCAUM’s 2018 Visibility Projections report dated March 2008.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

31 Table 9. State Level 2018 Emission Summary; March 2008 MANE-V U EGU Modeling Inventory. (See next page for file names.)

State RPO NOx SO2 VOC CO PM-10 PM-2.5 NH3
Connecticut MANE-VU 3,418 6,697 145 9,836 959 927 341 Delaware MANE-VU 12,341 10,941 117 1,183 2,950 2,438 76

District Of Columbia MANE-VU 103 83 5 154 104 99 12 Maine MANE-VU 1,827 6,806 53 4,057 296 279 139 Maryland MANE-VU 14,709 43,764 575 11,831 8,253 6,433 435 Massachusetts MANE-VU 18,157 45,941 484 13,860 3,917 3,233 1,059 New Hampshire MANE-VU 3,089 10,766 73 1,697 2,268 2,156 124 New Jersey MANE-VU 13,636 15,918 352 7,611 4,017 3,515 564 New York MANE-VU 24,376 74,587 758 22,242 11,031 9,343 1,471 Pennsylvania MANE-VU 82,881 170,992 1,919 41,446 31,580 23,756 1,790 Rhode Island MANE-VU 576 55 42 1,627 157 156 127

Vermont MANE-VU 105 35 3 117 26 25 9 MANE-VU Total 175,219 386,584 4,528 115,660 65,558 52,360 6,148
Alabama VISTAS 62,860 163,567 1,620 21,611 7,385 4,380 1,033 Florida VISTAS 58,341 167,685 1,903 42,946 9,355 6,330 2,665 Georgia VISTAS 69,308 90,408 1,805 35,584 18,217 11,319 1,676 Kentucky VISTAS 59,740 255,559 1,344 12,125 6,194 4,067 436 Mississippi VISTAS 10,455 18,241 1,055 11,822 7,007 6,853 545 North Carolina VISTAS 56,526 126,042 1,147 16,376 32,676 26,014 608 South Carolina VISTAS 50,068 105,436 860 13,078 28,110 24,454 578 Tennessee VISTAS 30,008 135,344 886 7,126 15,861 13,320 241 Virginia VISTAS 60,615 125,849 921 14,017 13,505 11,757 553 West Virginia VISTAS 51,177 127,609 1,382 11,896 6,344 3,643 177 VISTAS Total 509,098 1,315,740 12,922 186,579 144,653 112,137 8,512
Illinois MRPO 71,233 208,832 2,229 17,868 32,649 30,132 1,152 Indiana MRPO 95,376 403,473 2,105 19,416 35,081 27,835 1,274 Michigan MRPO 78,605 213,066 1,623 17,521 38,902 34,276 1,091 Ohio MRPO 83,129 353,293 2,254 23,832 42,753 33,322 1,772 Wisconsin MRPO 45,701 96,934 1,101 11,901 15,629 14,246 626 MRPO Total 374,044 1,275,598 9,311 90,539 165,015 139,812 5,915 Arkansas CENRAP 33,097 82,605 696 11,429 3,897 3,326 814 Iowa CENRAP 51,119 147,305 770 8,758 10,033 8,615 569 Kansas CENRAP 83,333 81,486 798 7,203 8,520 6,807 461 Louisiana CENRAP 30,432 74,263 660 11,043 3,966 3,590 919 Minnesota CENRAP 41,029 85,847 674 5,563 8,162 7,035 343 Missouri CENRAP 77,660 280,887 1,579 13,165 18,456 16,769 799 Nebraska CENRAP 50,781 73,629 450 3,590 2,296 1,914 217 Oklahoma CENRAP 76,048 113,680 1,008 28,182 5,561 4,840 1,355 Texas CENRAP 153,837 339,433 4,988 102,581 38,952 31,630 6,424 CENRAP Total 597,336 1,279,135 11,622 191,515 99,842 84,527 11,901 Arizona WRAP 59,774 55,941 724 17,806 2,811 634 630 California WRAP 17,537 1,528 2,558 31,173 1,219 1,059 0 Colorado WRAP 77,113 60,914 1,465 18,939 3,138 307 537 Idaho WRAP 2,236 1,683 50 3,283 335 87 0 Montana WRAP 44,733 31,303 565 11,818 1,796 247 13 Nevada WRAP 54,300 22,118 1,570 10,598 4,230 768 903 New Mexico WRAP 32,925 17,796 695 10,976 794 627 43 North Dakota WRAP 82,741 152,828 909 13,647 3,958 2,645 383 Oregon WRAP 15,742 15,096 474 5,753 1,288 323 219 South Dakota WRAP 17,681 13,522 118 689 247 217 52 Utah WRAP 76,136 41,394 597 17,150 4,637 2,000 1,350 Washington WRAP 16,884 7,011 249 4,008 1,474 1,027 12 Wyoming WRAP 104,142 96,745 1,147 18,871 10,445 7,411 404 WRAP Total 601,942 517,879 11,122 164,711 36,371 17,353 4,547 National Total 2,257,639 4,774,936 49,505 749,003 511,439 406,188 37,023 Annual Emissions (Tons)

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

32 Files used in preparing Table 9 include fo r CENRAP and WRAP, the VISTAS Base G2 Modeling file (egu_18_vistas_g2_20feb2007.txt.), and the following additional files:

MANE-VU: EGU2018_MANEVUv3_nonSO2.ida EGU2018_MANEVU_SO2_non167plus.ida EGU2018_MANEVU_SO2_167plus.ida
VISTAS: EGU2018_VISTASG2_SO2_non167plus_CAIR
addback.ida EGU2018_VISTASG2_SO2_167plus_CAIRadd
back.ida EGU2018_VISTASG2_nonSO2.ida MRPO: EGU2018_MWRPO_SO2_167plus_CAIRaddback.
ida EGU2018_MWRPO_SO2_non167p_non65_CAIR
addback.ida EGU2018_MWRPO_SO2_65_CAIRaddback.ida EGU2018_MWRPO_nonSO2.ida

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

33 6 EGU PREPARATION TIMELINE

The following section provides a chronological revi ew of the events and milestones that occurred during the preparation of EGU emission forecasts in support of regional haze SIP preparation.

2004

• VISTAS/MRPO sponsor first IPM 2.1.6 runs for 2018 (Phase I)

• Phase I (VISTAS_CAIR_2) results released
2005

• RPOs move to IPM 2.1.9 (Phase II)

• Revisions to NEEDS input file and global para meters submitted by RPOs for revised runs

• Phase II (VISTAS_II_PC _1f) results released

• IPM parsed to NIF and NIF to SMOKE IDA format conversion occurs

• Initial RPO adjustments and modifications of IPM results

• RPOs share IPM 2.1.9 inputs and configuration from Phase II with EPA

• EPA releases IPM 2.1.9 results of CAIR/CAMR modeling
2006

• Additional RPO control and modeling file adjustments to Phase II runs

• RPOs simulate 2018 forecast year to support regional haze SIP submittals

• RPOs work with EPA to configure NEEDS 3.0 for next round of EPA modeling

• EPA releases IPM 2006 revised projections

• RPOs identify potential control measures and estimate benefits for meeting reasonable progress goals

• Additional RPO control and modeling file adjustments to Phase II runs
2007

• RPOs analyze cost and other factors associated with potential control measures

• RPOs coordinate with EPA on inputs and runs of IPM 3.0

• EPA releases IPM 3.0 results of revised CAIR/CAMR/CAVR modeling

• Interstate and inter-regional consultation regarding potential control measures

• MANE-VU states agree to pursue several control measures

• RPOs begin regional modeling to assess visibility impacts of controls
2008

• RPOs model to determine progress goals for regional haze SIP

• States finalize regional haze SIPs

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

34 7 REFERENCES

Alpine Geophysics, LLC, 2005a

. EGU Emission Facto rs and Emission Fa ctor Assignment

, technical memorandum prepar ed for VISTAS EGU Speci al Interest Workgroup, 2005.

Alpine Geophysics, LLC, 2005b

. Emission Factor/Rate Developm ent for IPM Post-Processing

, technical memorandum prep ared for VISTAS EGU Sp ecial Interest Workgroup.

Alpine Geophysics, LLC, 2006

. Future Year Emissions Inventor ies, Draft Work Assignment #1, Technical Memorandum - Task 1, prepared for MARAMA, 2006.

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., 2004. Electricity Generating Unit (EGU) Growth Modeling Method Task 2 Evaluation – Final Report, prepared for Lake Mi chigan Air Directors Consortium, 2004.

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., 2005

. LADCO IPM Model Parsed File Post-Processing Methodology and File Preparation (J anuary 2005) – Technical Memorandum , prepared for Lake Michigan Air Direct ors Consortium, 2005.

ENVIRON, 2007. Technical Support Document for CE NRAP Emissions and Air Quality Modeling to Support Regional Haze State Implementation Plans , prepared for Central Regional Air Planning Association.

EPA, 2004

. Analysis in Support of the Clean Air Inte rstate Rule Using th e Integrated Planning
Model , Technical Support Docume nt for the Final Clean Air Interstate Rule, 2004.

EPA, 2005a

. Modeling of Control Costs, Emissions, and C ontrol Retrofits for Cost Effectiveness and Feasibility Analyses , Technical Support Document for the Final Clean Air Interstate Rule,
2005.

EPA, 2005b

. Standalone Documentation for EPA Base Case 2004 (V.2.1.9) Using the Integrated Planning Model , EPA 430-R-05-011. Available at http: //www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/epaipm/past-modeling.html#version2004

.

ERG, 2006

. WRAP Point and Area Source Emissions Projections for the 2018 Base Case Inventory, Version 1 , prepared for Emission Inventory Workgroup, 2006.

Houyoux , M.; Vukovich, J.; Brandmeyer, J., 2000. Spar se Matrix Operator Kernal Emissions Modeling System (SMOKE) Us er Manual, Version 1.1.2 Draf t, MCNC-North Carolina Supercomuting Center Environmental Programs.

ICF Resources, LLC., 2005. Future Year Electricity Genera ting Sector Emission Inventory Development Using the Integrated Planning Mode l (IPM®) in Support of Fine Particulate Mass and Visibility Modeling in the VISTAS and Midwest RPO Regions , prepared for VISTAS, 2005.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

35 ICF Resources, LLC., 2007

. Comparison of CAIR and CAIR Plus Proposal using the Integrated Planning Model (IPM®) , prepared for MARAMA.

Koerber, 2007. Personal and electronic communication from Mark Janssen to Julie McDill, MARAMA and Andy Bodnari k, New Hampshire DEP.

MACTEC, 2006

. Development of Emission Projecti ons for 2009, 2012, and 2018 for NonEGU Point, Area, and Nonroad Sources in the MANE-VU Region , prepared for MARAMA.

MACTEC, 2007

. Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018, Emission Inventories for VISTAS , prepared for VISTAS, 2007.

MRPO, 2006 . Personal and electronic communication fr om Mark Janssen to Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics, LLC., 2006.

NESCAUM, 2006a

. Contributions to Regional Haze in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic U.S

., Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, Boston, MA, 2006a.

NESCAUM, 2006b

. The Nature of the Fine Particle and Regional Haze Air Quality Problems in the MANE-VU Region: A Co nceptual Description , Available at: http://www.nescaum.org/documents/2006-1102-pm-con ceptual-model.pdf/, Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, Boston, MA, 2006b.

NESCAUM, 2008a

. MANE-VU Modeling for Reasonable Pr ogress Goals Model performance evaluation, pollution apportionment, and control measure benefits , prepared for MANE-VU,
2008a.

NESCAUM, 2008b

. 2018 Visibility Projections , prepared for MANE-VU.

VISTAS, 2007. Electronic communication from Doris Mc Leod 11/7/2007.

Janssen, 2008. Personal communication fr om Mark Janssen 3/28/2008.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

36 Appendix A

TOP ELECTRIC GENERATING EMISSION POINTS CONTRIBUTING TO
VISIBILITY IMPA IRMENT IN MA NE-VU IN 2002

For each of three MANE-VU Class I Areas the 100 Electric Generating Unit (EGU) stacks with the most significant imp act on visibility impairment were identified by Calpuff modeling conducted by two modeling centers. 1 

## Many of these stacks have a regional impact and therefore significantly impact more than one Class I Ar ea. When the “Top Impacting” stacks are aggregated into a single group th ere are 167 individual “Top Impact ing” stacks identified. The map on the following page indicat es the location of the 167 stac ks, and the tabl e following the map provides identifying information, emissions used in the Calpuff modeling, and predicted impacts. The following informati on may be found in the listed co lumns of the following table:
1. Row Number (1 through 167)
2. CEMS Unit ID: an arbitrary number identifying the CEMS unit
3. ORIS ID: a standard identificati on number associated with each unit
4. Acadia MM5: The rank of this source based on its predicted sulfate ion annual impact on Acadia in 2002 using meteorologi cal data from the MM5 model. (A blank in columns 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 indicates th is source was not among the top 100 for this Class I area as predicted by the indicated model.)
5. Acadia VTDEC: The rank of this source in terms of its predicted sulfate ion annual impact on Acadia in 2002 using National Weather Service data.

6. Brig MM5: The rank of this source in terms of its predicted sulfate ion annual impact on Brigantine in 2002 using meteorologi cal data from the MM5 model.
7. Brig VTDEC: The rank of this source in terms of its predicte d sulfate ion annual impact on Brigantine in 2002 using National Weather Service data.
8. Lye MM5: The rank of this source in terms of its predicted sulfate ion annual impact on Lye Brook in 2002 using meteorologi cal data from the MM5 model.
9. Lye VTDEC: The rank of this source in te rms of its predicted sulfate ion annual impact on Lye Brook in 2002 using National Weather Service data.
10. MM5 2002 SO 2 

## Tons per Year: Emi ssions calculated from CE MS data and used by modelers who used the MM5 generated meteorological data
11. VTDEC 2002 SO 2 

## Tons per Year: Emissions calcu lated from CEMS data and used by modelers who used the national weathe r service generated meteorological data
12. Plant Number (1 through 105): The 167 stacks are located at 105 plants.
13. Plant Name—table is in alphabetical order by plant within each state
14. Plant Type: coal fired or oil/g as fired electric generating units
15. State Name—table is in al phabetical order by state
16. State Code

1 

### For more information and detailed modeling results, see Appendix D: Source Dispersion Model Methods, in
NESCAUM 2006a.

## DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/08

37 Figure A-1 . Top 167 US Electric Gene rating Facility Stacks A ffecting MANE-VU Class I
Areas in 2002.DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/0838

Row number CEMS Unit ORIS ID Acadia MM5 Acadia VTDEC Brig MM5 Brig VTDEC Lye MM5 Lye VTDEC MM5 2002 S02 TPY VTDEC 2002 SO2 TPY Plant Name Plant Type State Name State Code1 D005935 59390 54 2,138 2,136 1 EDGE MOOR O/G Steam Delaware 102 D005941 594 95 3,742 2 INDIAN RIVER Coal Steam Delaware 103 D005942 594 74 3,760 2 INDIAN RIVER Coal Steam Delaware 104 D005943 594 84 44 4,686 4,682 2 INDIAN RIVER Coal Steam Delaware 105 D005944 594 69 21 7,390 7,384 2 INDIAN RIVER Coal Steam Delaware 106 D007031LR 703 79 86 75 38,520 38,486 3 BOWEN Coal Steam Georgia 137 D007032LR 703 72 89 61 68 37,289 37,256 3 BOWEN Coal Steam Georgia 138 D007033LR 703 71 99 74 64 63 94 43,067 43,029 3 BOWEN Coal Steam Georgia 139 D007034LR 703 69 95 86 58 60 89 41,010 40,974 3 BOWEN Coal Steam Georgia 1310 D00709C02 709 84 75 89 71 47,591 47,549 4 HARLLEE BRANCH Coal Steam Georgia 1311 D00861C01 861 28 96 65 46 62 42,355 42,318 5 COFFEEN Coal Steam Illinois 1712 D010011 1001 53 28,876 28,851 6 CAYUGA Coal Steam Indiana 1813 D010012 1001 95 46 68 26,016 25,992 6 CAYUGA Coal Steam Indiana 1814 D00983C01 983 52 19,922 7 CLIFTY CREEK Coal Steam Indiana 1815 D00983C02 983 54 18,131 7 CLIFTY CREEK Coal Steam Indiana 1816 D0099070 990 55 10070 37 29,801 29,774 8 ELMERW STOUT O/G Steam Indiana 1817 D06113C03 6113 30 48 14 43 22 41 71,182 71,119 9 GIBSON Coal Steam Indiana 1818 D06113C04 6113 44 70 97 83 73 83 27,848 27,823 9 GIBSON Coal Steam Indiana 1819 D01008C01 1008 73 10047 24,109 24,087 10 R GALLAGHER Coal Steam Indiana 1820 D01008C02 1008 98 55 23,849 23,828 10 R GALLAGHER Coal Steam Indiana 1821 D06166C02 6166 62 44 30 81 33 57 51,708 51,663 11 ROCKPORT Coal Steam Indiana 1822 D00988C03 98877 15,946 12 TANNERS CREEK Coal Steam Indiana 1823 D00988U4 98814 29 52 34 7 1945,062 45,022 12 TANNERS CREEK Coal SteamIndiana 1824 D01010C05 1010 4332 12 28 31 1760,747 60,693 13 WABASH RIVER Coal SteamIndiana 1825 D067054 6705 34 60 34 44 73 40,118 40,082 14 WARRICK Coal Steam Indiana 1826 D06705C02 6705 92 75 96 27,895 14 WARRICK Coal Steam Indiana 1827 D01353C02 1353 38 30 15 26 85 29 41,545 41,508 15 BIG SANDY Coal Steam Kentucky 21DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/0839

Row number CEMS Unit ORIS ID Acadia MM5 Acadia VTDEC Brig MM5 Brig VTDEC Lye MM5 Lye VTDEC MM5 2002 S02 TPY VTDEC 2002 SO2 TPY Plant Name Plant Type State Name State Code28 D01384CS1 1384 22 58 21,837 21,817 16 COOPER Coal Steam Kentucky 2129 D01355C03 1355 21 51 99 68 52 38,104 38,070 17 E W BROWN Coal Steam Kentucky 2130 D060182 6018 83 39 12,083 18 EAST BEND Coal Steam Kentucky 2131 D01356C02 1356 93 71 88 50 59 25,646 25,623 19 GHENT Coal Steam Kentucky 2132 D060411 6041 61 18,375 20 H L SPURLOCK Coal Steam Kentucky 2133 D060412 6041 53 91 98 20,491 20,473 20 H L SPURLOCK Coal Steam Kentucky 2134 D013644 1364 81 7,185 21 MILL CREEK Coal Steam Kentucky 2135 D013782 1378 87 20,245 22 PARADISE Coal Steam Kentucky 2136 D013783 1378 76 10011 84 55 42 46,701 46,660 22 PARADISE Coal Steam Kentucky 2137 D015074 1507 781,170 23 WILLIAM F WYMAN O/G Steam Maine 2338 D006021 602 90 38 10020,014 19,996 24 BRANDON SHORES Coal Steam Maryland 2439 D006022 602 99 29 99 19,280 19,263 24 BRANDON SHORES Coal Steam Maryland 2440 D015521 1552 63 17,782 17,767 25 C P CRANE Coal Steam Maryland 2441 D015522 1552 68 14,274 14,262 25 C P CRANE Coal Steam Maryland 2442 D01571CE2 1571 42 47 1 4 20 28 48,566 48,522 26 CHALK POINT Coal Steam Maryland 2443 D01572C23 1572 73 79 47 45 69 32 32,188 32,159 27 DICKERSON Coal Steam Maryland 2444 D015543 1554 77 10,084 10,07528 HERBERT A WAGNER O/G Steam Maryland 2445 D015731 1573 67 50 16 12 56 38 36,82336,790 29 MORGANTOWN Coal Steam Maryland 2446 D015732 1573 59 53 10 13 51 39 30,78830,761 29 MORGANTOWN Coal Steam Maryland 2447 D016191 1619 37 80 9,252 9,244 30 BRAYTON POINT Coal Steam Massachusetts 2548 D016192 1619 35 66 8,889 8,881 30 BRAYTON POINT Coal Steam Massachusetts 2549 D016193 1619 4 14 65 56 79 19,325 19,308 30 BRAYTON POINT Coal Steam Massachusetts 2550 D015991 1599 5 3665 13,014 13,002 31 CANALO/G Steam Massachusetts 2551 D015992 1599 7 2774 8,980 8,97131 CANAL O/G SteamMassachusetts 2552 D016061 1606 48 5,249 32 MOUNT TOM Coal Steam Massachusetts 2553 D016261 1626 85 3,430 33 SALEM HARBOR Coal Steam Massachusetts 2554 D016263 1626 91 78 4,971 4,966 33 SALEM HARBOR Coal Steam Massachusetts 25DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/0840

Row number CEMS Unit ORIS ID Acadia MM5 Acadia VTDEC Brig MM5 Brig VTDEC Lye MM5 Lye VTDEC MM5 2002 S02 TPY VTDEC 2002 SO2 TPY Plant Name Plant Type State Name State Code55 D016264 1626 32 252,880 2,878 33SALEM HARBOR O/G SteamMassachusetts 2556 D016138 1613 94 4,376 34 SOMERSET Coal Steam Massachusetts 2557 D01702C09 1702 96 4,565 35 DAN E KARN Coal Steam Michigan 2658 D01733C12 1733 49 24 80 80 45 22 46,081 46,040 36 MONROE Coal Steam Michigan 2659 D01733C34 1733 27 26 76 26 27 39,362 39,327 36 MONROE Coal Steam Michigan 2660 D017437 1743 91 15,805 37 ST CLAIR Coal Steam Michigan 2661 D017459A 1745 76 61 18,341 18,324 38 TRENTON CHANNEL Coal Steam Michigan 2662 D023641 2364 2 57 9,356 9,348 39 MERRIMACK Coal Steam New Hampshire 3363 D023642 2364 1 17 99 28 87 19,453 19,435 39 MERRIMACK Coal Steam New Hampshire 3364 D080021 8002 45 745,033 5,028 40NEWINGTON O/G Steam New Hampshire 3365 D023781 2378 81 2 15 9,747 9,738 41 B L ENGLAND Coal Steam New Jersey 3466 D024032 2403 6397 25 50 40 4418,785 18,768 42 HUDSON O/G Steam New Jersey 3467 D024081 2408 95 8,076 43 MERCER Coal Steam New Jersey 3468 D024082 2408 60 5,675 43 MERCER Coal Steam New Jersey 3469 D02549C01 2549 64 41 42 72 25,343 25,320 44 C R HUNTLEY Coal Steam New York 3670 D02549C02 2549 99 12,317 44 C R HUNTLEY Coal Steam New York 3671 D024804 248071 7,720 45DANSKAMMER O/G SteamNew York 3672 D02554C03 2554 33 51 62 27 51 30,151 30,125 46 DUNKIRK Coal Steam New York 3673 D02526C03 2526 78 14,929 47 WESTOVER Coal Steam New York 3674 D025276 2527 80 12,650 48 GREENIDGE Coal Steam New York 3675 D025163 2516 967,359 49 NORTHPORT O/G Steam New York 3676 D025945 2594 76 1,74750 OSWEGO O/G Steam New York 3677 D02642CS2 2642 91 14,086 51 ROCHESTER 7 Coal Steam New York 3678 D080061 8006 93 3,81752 ROSETON O/G Steam New York 3679 D080062 8006 88 2,84052 ROSETON O/G Steam New York 3680 D080421 8042 13 1218 5 10 34 57,820 57,769 53 BELEWSCREEK Coal Steam North Carolina 3781 D080422 8042 23 1532 10 15 49 45,296 45,256 53 BELEWS CREEK CoalSteam North Carolina 3782 D027215 2721 98 45 87 39 97 85 19,145 19,128 54 CLIFFSIDE Coal Steam North Carolina 3783 D027133 2713 61 14,460 55 L V SUTTON Coal Steam North Carolina 37DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/0841

Row number CEMS Unit ORIS ID Acadia MM5 Acadia VTDEC Brig MM5 Brig VTDEC Lye MM5 Lye VTDEC MM5 2002 S02 TPY VTDEC 2002 SO2 TPY Plant Name Plant Type State Name State Code84 D027093 2709 97 9,390 56 LEE Coal Steam North Carolina 3785 D027273 2727 10040 48 75 84 26,329 26,305 57 MARSHALL Coal Steam North Carolina 3786 D027274 2727 89 39 83 51 66 82 27,308 27,284 57 MARSHALL Coal Steam North Carolina 3787 D06250C05 6250 60 59 35 37 27,395 27,371 58 MAYO Coal Steam North Carolina 3788 D027121 2712 59 12,031 12,020 59 ROXBORO Coal Steam North Carolina 3789 D027122 2712 82 41 54 23 94 29,337 29,310 59 ROXBORO Coal Steam North Carolina 3790 D02712C03 2712 56 37 57 24 21 78 30,776 30,749 59 ROXBORO Coal Steam North Carolina 3791 D02712C04 2712 88 72 47 47 22,962 22,941 59 ROXBORO Coal Steam North Carolina 3792 D0283612 2836 55 2048 89 29 35 41,432 41,395 60AVON LAKE Coal Steam Ohio 3993 D028281 2828 29 9 31 30 24 8 37,307 37,274 61 CARDINAL Coal Steam Ohio 3994 D028282 2828 56 20,598 20,580 61 CARDINAL Coal Steam Ohio 3995 D028283 2828 80 15,372 61 CARDINAL Coal Steam Ohio 3996 D028404 2840 3 1 6 2 2 3 87,801 87,724 62 CONESVILLE Coal Steam Ohio 3997 D02840C02 2840 84 73 81 63 22,79122,771 62 CONESVILLE Coal Steam Ohio 3998 D028375 2837 86 5635 70 35,970 35,938 63 EASTLAKE Coal Steam Ohio 3999 D081021 8102 23 71 59 95 18,207 18,191 64 GEN J M GAVIN Coal Steam Ohio 39100 D081022 8102 78 12,333 12,322 64 GEN J M GAVIN Coal Steam Ohio 39101 D028501 2850 36 67 39 53 45 30,798 30,771 65 J M STUART Coal Steam Ohio 39102 D028502 2850 24 65 40 49 98 46 28,698 28,673 65 J M STUART Coal Steam Ohio 39103 D028503 2850 26 72 62 27,968 27,944 65 J M STUART Coal Steam Ohio 39104 D028504 2850 20 77 45 52 88 54 27,343 27,319 65 J M STUART Coal Steam Ohio 39105 D060312 6031 67 77 90 19,517 19,500 66 KILLEN STATION Coal Steam Ohio 39106 D02876C01 2876 40 7 3 9 30 10 72,593 72,529 67 KYGER CREEK Coal Steam Ohio 39107 D028327 2832 65 28 59 22 48 20 46,991 46,950 68 MIAMI FORT Coal Steam Ohio 39108 D02832C06 2832 60 43 64 23,694 23,673 68 MIAMI FORT Coal Steam Ohio 39109 D028725 2872 74 92 78 90 36 30,079 30,052 69 MUSKINGUM RIVER Coal Steam Ohio 39110 D02872C04 2872 6 19 13 6 19 15 83,134 83,060 69 MUSKINGUM RIVER Coal Steam Ohio 39111 D02864C01 2864 70 56 61 63 49 24 35,193 35,162 70 R E BURGER Coal Steam Ohio 39DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/0842

Row number CEMS Unit ORIS ID Acadia MM5 Acadia VTDEC Brig MM5 Brig VTDEC Lye MM5 Lye VTDEC MM5 2002 S02 TPY VTDEC 2002 SO2 TPY Plant Name Plant Type State Name State Code112 D07253C01 7253 89 58 57 33 30,977 30,949 71 RICHARD GORSUCH Ohio 39113 D028665 2866 82 53 19,796 19,779 72 W H SAMMIS Coal Steam Ohio 39114 D028667 2866 57 16 42 41 41 16 33,601 33,572 72 W H SAMMIS Coal Steam Ohio 39115 D02866C01 2866 97 54 93 96 92 30 24,649 24,627 72 W H SAMMIS Coal Steam Ohio 39116 D02866C02 2866 69 92 50 26,022 25,999 72 W H SAMMIS Coal Steam Ohio 39117 D02866M6A 2866 85 58 19,564 19,546 72 W H SAMMIS Coal Steam Ohio 39118 D060191 6019 93 72 60 21,496 73 W H ZIMMER Coal Steam Ohio 39119 D028306 2830 46 38 70 40 12 69 30,466 30,439 74 WALTER C BECKJORD Coal Steam Ohio 39120 D031782 3178 77 63 81 16,484 16,469 75 ARMSTRONG Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42121 D031403 3140 31 34 9 46 18 18 38,801 38,767 76 BRUNNER ISLAND Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42122 D03140C12 3140 52 46 49 69 25 23 29,736 29,709 76 BRUNNER ISLAND Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42123 D082261 8226 25 21 33 42 36 9 40,268 40,232 77 CHESWICK Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42124 D03179C01 3179 16 10 5 8 5 4 79,635 79,565 78 HATFIELD'S FERRY Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42125 D031221 3122 11 6 26 38 17 14 45,754 45,714 79 HOMER CITY Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42126 D031222 3122 9 4 37 92 13 11 55,216 55,167 79 HOMER CITY Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42127 D031361 3136 8 2 4 14 6 1 87,434 87,357 80 KEYSTONE Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42128 D031362 3136 18 3 8 19 8 2 62,847 62,791 80 KEYSTONE Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42129 D03148C12 3148 71 84 17,214 81 MARTINS CREEK Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42130 D031491 3149 19 8 35 7 1 6 60,242 60,188 82 MONTOUR Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42131 D031492 3149 15 5 21 20 3 5 50,276 50,232 82 MONTOUR Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42132 D031131 3113 82 9,674 83 PORTLAND Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42133 D031132 3113 36 93 14,294 83 PORTLAND Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42134 D03131CS1 3131 54 31 79 32 65 22,344 22,324 84 SHAWVILLE Coal Steam Pennsylvania 42135 D033193 3319 10011,045 85 JEFFERIES O/GSteam SouthCarolina 45136 D033194 3319 90 8711,838 85 JEFFERIESO/G Steam South Carolina 45137 D03297WT1 3297 68 61 17,671 86 WATEREE Coal Steam South Carolina 45138 D03297WT2 3297 83 73 17,199 86 WATEREE Coal Steam South Carolina 45139 D03298WL1 3298 35 94 37 25,170 25,148 87 WILLIAMS Coal Steam South Carolina 45DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE—4/28/0843

Row number CEMS Unit ORIS ID Acadia MM5 Acadia VTDEC Brig MM5 Brig VTDEC Lye MM5 Lye VTDEC MM5 2002 S02 TPY VTDEC 2002 SO2 TPY Plant Name Plant Type State Name State Code140 D062491 6249 58 82 17,920 88 WINYAH Coal Steam South Carolina 45141 D03403C34 3403 85 20,314 89 GALLATIN Coal Steam Tennessee 47142 D03405C34 3405 39 19,368 90 JOHN SEVIER Coal Steam Tennessee 47143 D03406C10 3406 10 11 27 33 4 43 104,523 104,431 91 JOHNSONVILLE Coal Steam Tennessee 47144 D03407C15 3407 64 87 66 67 76 37,308 37,274 92 KINGSTON Coal Steam Tennessee 47145 D03407C69 3407 48 98 91 82 91 38,645 38,611 92 KINGSTON Coal Steam Tennessee 47146 D038033 3803 55 9,49393 CHESAPEAKE Coal Steam Virginia 51147 D038034 3803 9416 10,806 93 CHESAPEAKE Coal Steam Virginia 51148 D037974 3797 90 9,293 94 CHESTERFIELD Coal Steam Virginia 51149 D037975 3797 88 44 27 86 19,620 19,602 94 CHESTERFIELD Coal Steam Virginia 51150 D037976 3797 66 18 7 3 34 66 40,570 40,534 94 CHESTERFIELD Coal Steam Virginia 51151 D03775C02 3775 47 16,674 95 CLINCH RIVER Coal Steam Virginia 51152 D038093 3809 52 64 29 10,477 10,468 96 YORKTOWN Coal Steam Virginia 51153 D03809CS0 3809 96 43 19 17 62 21,219 21,201 96 YORKTOWN Coal Steam Virginia 51154 D039423 3942 79 10,126 97 ALBRIGHT Coal Steam West Virginia 54155 D039431 3943 51 23 20 32 16 13 42,385 42,348 97 FORT MARTIN Coal Steam West Virginia 54156 D039432 3943 50 22 22 31 14 12 45,850 45,809 97 FORT MARTIN Coal Steam West Virginia 54157 D039353 3935 41 33 28 11 64 26 42,212 42,174 98 JOHN E AMOS Coal Steam West Virginia 54158 D03935C02 3935 17 42 43 1 11 21 63,066 63,010 98 JOHN E AMOS Coal Steam West Virginia 54159 D03947C03 3947 86 62 55 57 25 38,575 38,541 99 KAMMER Coal Steam West Virginia 54160 D03936C02 3936 98 15,480 15,467 100 KANAWHA RIVER Coal Steam West Virginia 54161 D03948C02 3948 58 13 17 36 9 7 55,405 55,356 101 MITCHELL Coal Steam West Virginia 54162 D062641 6264 75 49 50 18 77 40 42,757 42,719 102 MOUNTAINEER Coal Steam West Virginia 54163 D03954CS0 3954 68 24 25 23 67 20,130 20,112 103 MT STORM Coal Steam West Virginia 54164 D0393851 3938 79 97 12,948 12,936 104 PHILIP SPORN Coal Steam West Virginia 54165 D03938C04 3938 94 26,451 26,427 104 PHILIP SPORN Coal Steam West Virginia 54166 D060041 6004 66 8331 21,581 21,562 105 PLEASANTS Coal Steam West Virginia 54167 D060042 6004 8892 20,550 20,532 105 PLEASANTS Coal Steam West Virginia 54

### Final Report

Future Year Electricity Generating Sector Emission Inventory Development Using the

Integrated Planning Model (IPM ® 

### ) in Support of Fine Particulate Mass and Visibility
Modeling in the VISTAS and Midwest RPO Regions

Prepared for

Visib ility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the South east (VISTAS)

Prepared by
ICF Resources, L.L.C. 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031

April 2005

### Table of Contents

Table of Cont ents

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 2 A. Overview

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 3 B. Modeling Assumptions

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 3 C. Analysis Resul ts

................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 5 1. Emissions

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 5 2. Projected Costs

................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 5 3. Projected Control Te chnology Retrofits

................................ ................................ .............. 6 4. Projected Generation Mix

................................ ................................ ................................ ... 6 5. Projected Coal Production for the Electric Power Sector

................................ .................... 6 6. Projected Retail Electricity Prices

................................ ................................ ....................... 7 7. Projected Fuel Price Impacts

................................ ................................ .............................. 7
D. Li mitations of Analysis

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 8 E. Appendix

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 9
1. Changes made to the NEEDS NODA Database for the VISTAS Analysis

...................... 9 Table A1 Changes made to NO
x 

### Post Combustion Control Installations on Existing Units 10 Table A2 Changes made to NO
x 

### Emission Rates (lbs/MMBtu)

................................ .......... 11 Table A3 Changes made to SO 2 

### Scrubber Installations on Existing Units

......................... 15 Table A4 Changes made to SO 2 

### Emission Rate Limits (lbs/MM Btu)

................................ .. 16 Table A5 Changes made to Particulate Matter (PM) Control Installations on Existing Units

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 18 Table A6 Changes made to Sum mer Net Dependable Capacity (MW)

.............................. 19 Table A7 Changes made to Heat Rate (Btu/kWh)

................................ ............................. 20 Table A8 Changes made to Unit ID

................................ ................................ ................... 21 Table A9 Duke and Progress Energy SO 2 

### Control Plan for North Carolina Clean Smokestacks Rule

................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 22 Table A10 Duke and Progress Energy NO
x 

### C ontrol Plan for North Carolina Clean Smokestacks Rule

................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 23
2. Emission Results

................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 24 Table A11 State Level Base Case NO
x 

### Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

............... 25 Table A12 State Level Base Case SO 2 

### Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

............... 27 Table A13 State Level CAIR Case NO
x 

### Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

............... 29 Table A14 State Level CAIR Case SO 2 

### Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

............... 31 3. G eneration Results

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 33 Table A15 State Level Base Case Generation by Season (GWh)

................................ ..... 34 Table A16 State Level CAIR Case Generation by Season (GWh)

................................ ..... 36 4. Cost Results

................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 38 Table A17 FOM Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

................................ .............. 39 Table A18 VOM Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

................................ .............. 40 Table A19 Fuel Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

................................ ............... 41 Table A20 Capital Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

................................ ........... 42

### A. Overview

In order to model regional haze, visibility and other air quality issues, Visibility Improvement
State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS) awarded a contract to ICF R esources, L.L.C. (ICF) in August 2004, seeking ICF’s services to generate future year emission inventory for the electric generating sector of the contiguous United States using the Integrated Planning
Mode l (IPM ®



### IPM is a dynamic linear optimization model that can be used to examine air pollution control policies for various pollutants throughout the contiguous U.S. for the entire electric power system. The dynamic nature of IPM enables the projection o f the behavior of the power system over a specified future period. The optimization logic determines the least

- cost means of meeting electric generation and capacity requirements while complying with specified constraints including air pollution regulation s, transmission bottlenecks , and plant

- specific operational constraints. The versatility of IPM allows users to specify which constraints to exercise and populate IPM with their own datasets. )

.

This report s ummarizes the analysis that ICF has performed in g enerating the f uture y ear

e lectricity g enerating s ector e mission i nventory by u sing IPM (hereafter, the analysis is referred to as the VISTAS analysis). The model assumptions and data used in this analysis are presented in Section B and the Appendix. The r esults are presented in Section C and the analysis limitations are presented in Section D.

Since the modeling is based on the EPA’s prior analyses for which detailed public documentation is available, we have summarized only the incremental changes that w ere proposed by VISTAS and MRPO as part of this analysis. For detailed documentation on EPA’s prior modeling using IPM, please visit www.epa.gov/airmarkets/epa

- ipm

.

B. Modeling Assumptions

The VIST AS analysis is based on the USEPA Modeling Applications Using IPM (V.2.1.6). As per the analytical needs of VISTAS and MRPO, the following changes were made to the underlying assumptions in the US EPA Base Case (V2.1.6) in th is analysis:

i) The underlying database in the VISTAS analysis is US EPA’s National Electric Energy Data System (NEEDS 1 

### ) NODA Database, with changes based upon the comments and technical
directions from VISTAS and MRPO’s stakeholders . The changes focused on existing
installations of NO
x 

### , SO 2 

### and particulate matter (PM) controls, NO
x 

### emission rates

, SO 2

1 

### The NEEDS database contains the existing and planned/committed unit data in EPA modeling applications of IPM. NEEDS includes basic geographic, operating, air e missions, and other data on these generating units. For data sources underlying NEEDS and description of fields as well as the documentation on EPA Modeling Applications Using IPM (V.2.1.6), please visit website http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/epa

- ipm/index. html emission limits, capacity of existing units, heat rate and unit identifications of selected units in the VISTAS and MRPO regions. These changes are summarized in detail in Appendix 1.

### ii) The analysis covers the p eriod between 2007 and 2030. To make the model size and run

time tractable , IPM is run for a number of selected years with in the study horizon known as run
years

. Each run year represents several calendar years in the study horizon

, and all calendar years within the study horizon are mapped to their representative run years. Although results are only reported for the run years, IPM takes into account all years in the study horizon while developing the projections . Table 1 summarizes the mapping between the run years and the calendar years. Model results are available for all run years ; t he last run year (2026) results are

, however, not recommended to be used because of end

- year effects.

Table 1: IPM Run Years
Run Year Calendar Year s 2007 2007

- 2007
200 9 2008

- 2009
2010 2010

- 2012
2015 2013

- 2017
2018 2018

- 2018
2020 2019

- 2022
2026 2023

- 2030

iii) The Duke Power and Progress Energy SO 2 

### and NO
x



### i v ) The CAIR rule implemented as part of this analysis is broadly consistent with the Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 51, et al. Supplemental Proposal for the Rule to

Reduce Interstate Tra nsport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone (Clean Air Interstate Rule), proposed o n June 10, 2004. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan , Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin are the states affected by the CAIR SO control technology investment strategies for complying with North Carolina’s Clean Smoke stacks Rule were explicitly hardwired in the analysis.

2 

### and the CAIR annual NO
x 

### policies starting 2010. Conne cticut is affected by an ozone season NO
x 

### policy. The CAIR plants affected by the annual NO
x 

### policy are capped at 1.6 million tons starting 2010 and 1.33 million tons starting 2015. The power plants affected by the CAIR SO 2 

### policy have to surrender 2 Title IV SO 2 

### allowances for every
ton of SO 2 

### emitted starting 2010 and 3 Title IV SO 2 

### allowances for every ton of SO 2 

### emitted starting 2015.

### C. Analysis Results

ICF ran IPM under two future scenarios

– Base Case and CAIR Case. The Base Case represents the cur rent operation of the power system under currently known laws and regulations, including those that come into force in the study horizon. The CAIR Case is the Base Case with the proposed CAIR rule superimposed. The run results were parsed at the unit

level for the 2009 and 2018 run years. Appendix 2 summarizes the SO 2 

### and NO
x



### 1. Emissions emission results on a state level. The following paragraphs discuss the results from the two runs.

Table 2 presents the emissions from the Base Case and the CAIR Case i n the VISTAS analysis.

Table 2: SO 2 

### and NO x 

### Emissions from the Electric Power Sector (Million Tons)

Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

CAIR Affected Region SO 2 

### 9.1 8.2 5.3 4.1

NO x * 

### 2.9 3.0 2.8 1.4

VISTAS States SO 2 

### 3.44 2.96 2.28 1.42

NO x 

### 1.09 1.09 1.07 0.44

Midwest RPO States SO 2 

### 3.05 2.61 1.51 1.33

NO x 

### 0.83 0.88 0.83 0.34 

### *Note: Excludes Connecticut

In the CAIR region, compared with the Base Case, SO 2 

### emissions would be reduced by 3.8 million tons in 2009 and by 4.1 million tons in 2018. The NO
x



### Total projected state

- level emissions for SO emissions would be cut by 1.6 million tons annually in 2018, compared with the Base Case.

2 

### and NO
x



### 2. Projected Costs for both the Base Case and the CAIR
Case are included in Tables A11 , A12, A13, and A 14 in the Appendix.

For the proposed CAIR region, the analysis projects the annualized incremental cost for the US to be $2.1 billion in 2009 and $3.6 billion in 2018. This represents a 3.3% increase in production

cost in 2009 and a 4.6% incr ease in 2018 over the base case. The production cost as projected by IPM includes the capital costs of new investment decisions, fuel costs and the operation and maintenance costs of power plants. The marginal costs of emission reductions (allowance prices ) in the CAIR case are shown in Table 3.

### Table 3: Marginal Costs of Emission Reductions in CAIR Case (1999 $)

2009 2018

Marginal Cost ($/ton) SO 2 

### 700 1,100

NO
x 

### 1,500 1,700

**3. Projected Control Technology Retrofits**

In the VISTAS analysis, the propo sed CAIR policy requires the installation of an additional 67
GW of SO 2 

### scrubbers and an additional 35 GW of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) on existing coal capacity by 2018 (see Table 4). The pool of existing SCR ’s that are used during

the ozone seas on in the NO
x



### Table 4: Pollution Control Installations by Technology in 2018 (GW) SIP call region in the Base Case are allowed to operate year

round in the CAIR Case

.

Technology Base Case (Cumulative) CAIR Case (Cumulative)
Scrubber 19 86
SCR 33 67

**4. Projected Generation Mix** 

Table 5 shows the generation mix under the proposed CAIR policy. Coal

- fired generation and natural gas

- fired generation are projected to remain relatively unchanged due to the phased

- in nature of the proposed CAIR.

Relative to th e Base Case, in 2009, 2.7 GW of coal

- fired capacity is projected to be uneconomic to maintain ( approximately 1%) and 90 MW of coal

- fired capacity is projected to repower to natural gas in the CAIR Case

.

Table 5: National Generation Mix ( Bk Wh ’s )

Generating Fuel
Use 2009 2018
Base Case CAIR Case Base Case CAIR Case
Coal 2,115 2,072 2,219 2,154 Oil/Natural Gas 821 862 1,301 1,364
Other 1,197 1,197 1,196 1,194

**5. Projected Coal Production for the Electric Power Sector**

Coal production for electricity g eneration is expected to increase with or without the proposed CAIR (Table 6). The reductions in emissions from the power sector will be met through the installation of pollution controls for SO 2 

### and NO
x 

### .

### Table 6: Coal Production in the Electric Power Se ctor (Million Tons) Supply

Area 2009 2018
Base Case CAIR Case Base Case CAIR Case Appalachia 327 296 297 306
Interior 182 184 189 212

West 528 545 611 550
National 1,038 1,025 1,096 1,067

**6. Projected Retail Electricity Prices**

National average re tail electricity price s in the CAIR Case are projected to increase 2.4 percent in 2009 and 1.6 percent in 2018

. Table 7 and Table 8 summarize the national and regional level retail electricity prices. These estimates were developed using the Retail Electri city Price Model

.

Table 7: National Average Retail Electricity Prices ( 1999 Mills/kWh )
Base Case CAIR Case Percent Change
2009 59.4 60.9 2.4%


### 2018 63.2 64.3 1.6% 

### Source: Retail Electricity Price Model as documented in http://www.epa.gov/clearskies/ tech_sectiong.pdf

Retail electricity prices by NERC region are in Table 8

Table 8: Retail Electricity Prices by NERC Region ( 1999 Mills/kWh)

Power Primary States Included Base Case CAIR Case Region 2009 2018 2009 2018
ECAR OH,MI,IN,KY,WV,PA 51.3 56.7 53.8 58.7 

### ERCOT TX 53.0 65.0 54.8 65.3 

### MAAC PA,NJ,MD,DC,DE 56.9 69.3 59.5 71.6 

### MAIN IL,MO,WI 51.9 60.3 53.6 61.7 

### MAPP MN,IA,SD,ND,NE 54.6 49.4 54.7 49.8 

### NY NY 80.0 88.1 81.8 89.6 

### NE VT,NH,ME,MA,CT,RI 73.8 82.8 75.4 83.5 

### FRCC FL 70.8 68.8 71.7 69.6 

### STV VA,NC,SC,GA,AL,MS,TN,AR,LA 56.4 54.1 57.4 55.3 

### SPP KS,OK,MO 52.8 57.4 53.7 58.0 

### PNW WA,OR,ID 50.1 48.0 50.6 48.0 

### RM MT,WY,CO,UT,NM,AZ,NV,ID 61.5 65.1 62.1 65.2 

### CALI CA 96.8 98.2 97.6 98.3 

### Source: Retail Electricity Price Model as documented in
htt p://www.epa.gov/clearskies/tech_sectiong.pdf

**7. Projected Fuel Price Impacts**

The impacts of the CAIR on mine mouth coal prices and natural gas prices at the Henry Hub are summarized in Table 9.

### Table 9: Average Coal Mine Mouth and Henry Hub Natural G as Prices ( 1999$/MMBtu)

Fuel Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

Coal 0.62 0.55 0.60 0.55

Natural Gas 2.77 2.97 2.9 2.99

D . Limitations of Analysis

VISTAS modeling using IPM is based on various economic and engineering input assumptions

that are inherently uncertain, such as assumptions for future fuel prices, electricity demand growth and the cost and performance of control technologies. As configured, IPM does not take into account demand response (i.e., consumer reaction to changes in elec tricity prices).

### E . Appendix

**1. Changes made to the NEEDS NODA Database for the VISTAS Analysis** 

NEED S NODA is the most recent version of the NEEDS database that EPA has made public. It

contains existing and planned/committed generation unit data in the co ntiguous United States. In Appendix 1, the changes suggested by VISTAS and MRPO stakeholders are presented side by side against the values in the original NEEDS NODA for comparison. For d escription of the items changed, please visit website http://www.epa. gov/airmarkets/epa

- ipm/index.html

.Table A 1 Changes made to NO x Post Combustion Control Installations on Existing Units

Plant Name Unique ID Post Combustion
NO x Control (NEEDS NODA) Post Combustion
NO x Control

(VISTAS) Data Source*

ASHEVILLE 2706_B_1 SNCR None Progress Energy **

BARRY 3_B_1 SNCR None Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_2 SNCR None Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_3 SNCR None Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_4 SNCR None Southern Company
Barry 3_G_A1 None SCR Southern Company
Barry 3_G_A2ST None SCR S outhern Company

MT STORM 3954_B_3 None SCR NC

- WV

- SC

PLEASANTS 6004_B_1 None SCR NC

- WV

- SC

PLEASANTS 6004_B_2 None SCR NC

- WV

- SC

Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_3 None SCR Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_3CT None SCR Southern Company

Victor J Danie l Jr 6073_G_4CT None SCR Southern Company

* Data Source shows the name s of sheets in NEEDS

- NODA

- VISTAS

- Aug18Rev.xls , provided by Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.
** Progress Energy Compliance Plan for NC Clean Smokestack s Rule shows the existing NO x control a s AEFLGR

and not SNCR



## .Table A2 Changes made to NO x Emission Rates (lbs/MMBtu)

Plant Name Unique ID Mode1
Rate ** (VISTAS) Mode2
Rate ** (VISTAS) Mode3
Rate ** (VISTAS) Mode4
Rate ** (VISTAS) Data Source*
GREENE CO UNTY 10_B_1 0.718 0.718 0.468 0.468 Southern Company
GREENE COUNTY 10_B_2 0.416 0.416 0.380 0.380 Southern Company Greene County 10_G_GT10 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company Greene County 10_G_GT2 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company
Greene C ounty 10_G_GT3 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company Greene County 10_G_GT4 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company Greene County 10_G_GT5 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company Greene County 10_G_GT6 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company
Gree ne County 10_G_GT7 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company Greene County 10_G_GT8 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company Greene County 10_G_GT9 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company
CROSS 130_B_1 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 SC
CROSS 130_B_2 0.100 0.1 00 0.100 0.100 SC
EATON 2046_B_1 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company
EATON 2046_B_2 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company
EATON 2046_B_3 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company
Chevron Oil 2047_G_1 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company
Che vron Oil 2047_G_2 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company
Chevron Oil 2047_G_3 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company
Chevron Oil 2047_G_4 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company
Chevron Oil 2047_G_5 0.064 0.064 0.064 0.064 Southern Company
SWEATT 2048_B_1 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company
SWEATT 2048_B_2 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company
Sweatt 2048_G_A 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company
JACK WATSON 2049_B_1 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company
JACK WATSON 2049_B_2 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company
JACK WATSON 2049_B_3 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company
JACK WATSON 2049_B_4 0.470 0.470 0.415 0.415 Southern Company
JACK WATSON 2049_B_5 0.590 0.590 0.415 0.415 Southern Company
Jack Watson 2049_G_A 0.880 0.8 80 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
E C GASTON 26_B_1 0.473 0.473 0.473 0.473 Southern Company
E C GASTON 26_B_2 0.473 0.473 0.473 0.473 Southern Company
E C GASTON 26_B_3 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 Southern Company
E C GASTON 26_B_4 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 S outhern Company
E C GASTON 26_B_5 0.429 0.060 0.429 0.060 Southern Company
E C Gaston 26_G_GT4 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
ASHEVILLE 2706_B_1 0.491 0.319 0.491 0.319

- CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_5 0.294 0.070 0.294 0.070 NC

- WV

- SC
BARRY 3_B_1 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 Southern Company
BARRY 3_B_2 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 Southern Company
BARRY 3_B_3 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 Southern Company
BARRY 3_B_4 0.290 0.290 0.290 0.290 Southern Company
BARRY 3_B_5 0.380 0.380 0.380 0.380 Southern Company
Barr y 3_G_A1 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company Barry 3_G_A1CT 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company Barry 3_G_A1ST 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company Barry 3_G_A2C1 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company Barry 3_G_A2C2 0.013 0.013 0.013 0 .013 Southern Company Barry 3_G_A2ST 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company
W S LEE 3264_B_1 0.393 0.393 0.250 0.250 NC

- WV

- SC
W S LEE 3264_B_2 0.415 0.415 0.250 0.250 NC

- WV

- SC
W S Lee 3264_G_4 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 SC
W S Lee 3264_G_5 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 SC
W S Lee 3264_G_6 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 SC
MCMEEKIN 3287_B_MC 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 SCPlant Name Unique ID Mode1
Rate ** (VISTAS) Mode2
Rate ** (VISTAS) Mode3
Rate ** (VISTAS) Mode4
Rate ** (VISTAS) Data Source*
M1

MCMEEKIN 3287_B_MC
M2 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 SC
MT STORM 3954_B_3 0.604 0.060 0.604 0.060 NC

- WV

- SC
JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_1 0.275 0.060 0.275 0.060 Southern Company
JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_2 0.247 0.060 0.247 0.060 Southern Company
JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_3 0.306 0.070 0.306 0.070 Southern Company
JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_4 0.275 0.070 0.275 0.070 Southern Company
PLEASANTS 6004_B_1 0.302 0.060 0.302 0.060 NC

- WV

- SC
PLEASANTS 6004_B_2 0.335 0.060 0.335 0.060 NC

- WV

- SC
WANSLEY 6052_B_1 0.405 0.070 0.405 0.070 Southern Company
WANSLEY 6052_B_2 0.390 0.070 0.390 0.070 Southern Company Wansley 6052_G_5A 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Compan y VICTOR J DANIEL JR. 6073_B_1 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310 Southern Company
VICTOR J DANIEL JR. 6073_B_2 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 Southern Company
Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_3 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_3C
T 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_3S
T 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company
Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_4 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Victor J Daniel Jr 6073_G_4C
T 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company

Victor J Da niel Jr 6073_G_4S
T 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Southern Company
MCINTOSH 6124_B_1 0.613 0.613 0.410 0.410 Southern Company

McIntosh 6124_G_CT
1 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh 6124_G_CT
2 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh 61 24_G_CT
3 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh 6124_G_CT
4 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh 6124_G_CT
5 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh 6124_G_CT
6 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh 6124_G_CT
7 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company

McIntosh 6124_G_CT
8 0.090 0.090 0.090 0.090 Southern Company
WINYAH 6249_B_1 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 SC
WINYAH 6249_B_2 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 SC
WINYAH 6249_B_3 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 SC
WINYAH 6249_B_4 0.1 20 0.120 0.120 0.120 SC
SCHERER 6257_B_1 0.450 0.450 0.150 0.150 Southern Company
SCHERER 6257_B_2 0.450 0.450 0.150 0.150 Southern Company
SCHERER 6257_B_3 0.300 0.300 0.150 0.150 Southern Company
SCHERER 6257_B_4 0.300 0.300 0.150 0.150 Southern Comp any Wilson 6258_G_5A 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
Wilson 6258_G_5B 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
Wilson 6258_G_5C 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
Wilson 6258_G_5D 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
Wilson 6258_G_5 E 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
Wilson 6258_G_5F 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
Wilson 6258_G_IC1 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
CRIST 641_B_2 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company
CRIST 641_B_3 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 Southern Company
CRIST 641_B_4 0.400 0.400 0.240 0.240 Southern CompanyPlant Name Unique ID Mode1
Rate ** (VISTAS) Mode2
Rate ** (VISTAS) Mode3
Rate ** (VISTAS) Mode4
Rate ** (VISTAS) Data Source*
CRIST 641_B_5 0.400 0.400 0.240 0.240 Southern Company
CRIST 641_B_7 0.482 0.060 0.482 0.060 Southern Company
SCHOLZ 642_B_1 0.540 0.540 0.320 0.320 Southern Company
SCHOLZ 642_B _2 0.570 0.570 0.320 0.320 Southern Company
SMITH 643_B_1 0.490 0.490 0.240 0.240 Southern Company
SMITH 643_B_2 0.410 0.410 0.410 0.410 Southern Company Lansing Smith 643_G_CT1 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
GADSDEN 7_B_1 0.544 0.544 0.544 0 .544 Southern Company
GADSDEN 7_B_2 0.544 0.544 0.544 0.544 Southern Company
Atkinson 700_G_5A 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company
Atkinson 700_G_5B 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company

BOWEN 703_B_1BL
R 0.405 0.070 0.405 0.070 Southern Company

BOWEN 703_B_2BL
R 0.405 0.070 0.405 0.070 Southern Company

BOWEN 703_B_3BL
R 0.409 0.070 0.409 0.070 Southern Company

BOWEN 703_B_4BL
R 0.419 0.070 0.419 0.070 Southern Company
Bowen 703_G_6 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
HAMMOND 708_B_1 0.800 0.800 0.410 0.410 Southern Company
HAMMOND 708_B_2 0.800 0.800 0.410 0.410 Southern Company
HAMMOND 708_B_3 0.800 0.800 0.410 0.410 Southern Company
HAMMOND 708_B_4 0.404 0.070 0.404 0.070 Southern Company
HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_1 0.800 0.800 0.519 0.51 9 Southern Company
HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_2 0.800 0.800 0.374 0.374 Southern Company
HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_3 0.800 0.800 0.381 0.381 Southern Company
HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_4 0.800 0.800 0.381 0.381 Southern Company
JACK MCDONOUGH 710_B_MB1 0.450 0.450 0.23 0 0.230 Southern Company
JACK MCDONOUGH 710_B_MB2 0.450 0.450 0.230 0.230 Southern Company Jack McDonough 710_G_3A 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company Jack McDonough 710_G_3B 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 Southern Company
MCMANUS 715_B_1 0.310 0.310 0.3 10 0.310 Southern Company
MCMANUS 715_B_2 0.310 0.310 0.310 0.310 Southern Company
McManus 715_G_3A 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
McManus 715_G_3B 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
McManus 715_G_3C 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Com pany McManus 715_G_4A 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
McManus 715_G_4B 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
McManus 715_G_4C 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
McManus 715_G_4D 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
McManus 715_G_ 4E 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
McManus 715_G_4F 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
McManus 715_G_IC1 3.200 3.200 3.200 3.200 Southern Company
MITCHELL 727_B_3 0.625 0.625 0.625 0.625 Southern Company
Mitchell 727_G_4A 0.880 0.880 0.8 80 0.880 Southern Company
Mitchell 727_G_4B 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
Mitchell 727_G_4C 0.880 0.880 0.880 0.880 Southern Company
* Data Source shows the name s of sheets in NEEDS

- NODA

- VISTAS

- Aug18Rev.xls , provided by Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories. “SC” reflects the spreadsheet CopyofSCIPMdata.xls. Rate changes include VISTAS interpretation of stakeholder submitted data.



### **
Mode 1 Rate ( Uncontrolled Base Rate )

– This emission rate reflects current confi guration of combustion controls. If a post combustion NO
x 

### control such as a SCR or a SNCR exists, it is assumed that it is not operating.
Mode 2 Rate ( Controlled Base Rate )

– This emission rate reflects current configuration of combustion
controls . If a po st combustion NO
x 

### control such as a SCR or a SNCR exists, it is assumed that it is operating.

### Mode 3 Rate ( Uncontrolled Policy Rate )

– This emission rate reflects a state of the art configuration of combustion controls. If a post combustion NO
x 

### control suc h as a SCR or a SNCR exists, it is assumed that it is not operating.
Mode 4 Rate ( Controlled Policy Rate )

– This emission rate reflects a state of the art configuration of combustion controls. If a post combustion NO
x 

### control such as a SCR or a SNCR exists , it is assumed that it is operating.

For more details on the development of these rates please refer to 

## http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/epa

- ipm/section3powsysop.pdfTable A 3 Chang es made to SO 2 Scrubber Installations on Existing Units

Plant Name Unique ID Wet/DryScrubber (NEEDS NODA) Wet/DryScrubber (VISTAS) Data Source*

NORTH BRANCH POWER STATION 7537_B_1A Dry Scrubber

- NC

- WV

- SC

NORTH BRANCH POWER STATION 7537_B_1B Dry Scrubbe r

- NC

- WV

- SC

Morgantown Energy Facility 10743_G_GEN1 Dry Scrubber

- NC

- WV

- SC

* Data Source shows the name of sheets in NEEDS

- NODA

- VISTAS

- Aug18Rev.xls , provided by Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.Table A 4 Changes ma de to SO 2 Emission Rate Limits (lbs/MMBtu)

Plant Name Unique ID SO 2 Rate (NEEDS NODA) SO 2 Rate (VISTAS) Data Source*

GREENE COUNTY 10_B_1 4.000 1.197 Southern Company

GREENE COUNTY 10_B_2 4.000 1.197 Southern Company

EATON 2046_B_1 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

EATON 2046_B_2 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

EATON 2046_B_3 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

SWEATT 2048_B_1 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

SWEATT 2048_B_2 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_1 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_2 4.800 0.001 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_3 4.800 0.001 Southern Com pany

JACK WATSON 2049_B_4 4.800 0.885 Southern Company

JACK WATSON 2049_B_5 4.800 0.885 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_1 3.800 1.667 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_2 3.800 1.667 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_3 3.800 1.667 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_4 3.800 1.667 Southern Company

E C GASTON 26_B_5 3.800 1.667 Southern Company

BUCK 2720_B_5 2.300 1.630 NC

- WV

- SC

BUCK 2720_B_6 2.300 1.630 NC

- WV

- SC

BUCK 2720_B_7 2.300 1.630 NC

- WV

- SC

BUCK 2720_B_8 2.300 1.630 NC

- WV

- SC

BUCK 2720_B_9 2.300 1.630 NC

- WV

- SC

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_1 2.300 2.200 NC

- WV

- SC

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_2 2.300 2.200 NC

- WV

- SC

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_3 2.300 2 .200 NC

- WV

- SC

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_4 2.300 2.200 NC

- WV

- SC

CLIFFSIDE 2721_B_5 2.300 2.200 NC

- WV

- SC

DAN RIVER 2723_B_1 2.300 1.810 NC

- WV

- SC

DAN RIVER 2723_B_2 2.300 1.810 NC

- WV

- SC

DAN RIVER 2723_B_3 2.300 1.810 NC

- WV

- SC

BARRY 3_B_1 1.800 1.197 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_2 1.800 1.197 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_3 1.800 1.197 Southern Company

BARRY 3_B_4 1.800 1.197 Southern C ompany

BARRY 3_B_5 1.800 1.197 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_1 1.800 0.795 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_2 1.80 0 0.795 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_3 1.800 0.795 Southern Company

JAMES H MILLER JR 6002_B_4 1.800 0.795 Southern Company

VICTOR J DANIEL JR. 6073_B_1 4.800 0.885 Southern Company

VICTOR J DANIEL JR. 6073_B_2 4.800 0.885 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_1 1.200 0.796 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_2 1.200 0.796 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_3 1.200 0.796 Southern Company

SCHERER 6257_B_4 1.200 0.796 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_2 0.740 0.001 Southern CompanyPlant Name Unique ID SO 2 Rate (NEEDS NODA) SO 2 Rate (VISTAS) Data Source*

CRIST 641_B_3 0.740 0.001 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_4 5.9 00 1.197 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_5 5.900 1.197 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_6 5.900 1.197 Southern Company

CRIST 641_B_7 5.900 1.197 Southern Company

SCHOLZ 642_B_1 6.170 1.200 Southern Company

SCHOLZ 642_B_2 6.170 1.200 Southern Company

SMITH 643_B_1 6.170 1.197 Southern Company

SMITH 643_B_2 6.170 1.197 Southern Company

GADSDEN 7_B_1 4.000 2.500 Southern Company

GADSDEN 7_B_2 4.000 2.500 Southern Company

BOWEN 703_B_1BLR 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_1 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_2 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_3 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HAMMOND 708_B_4 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRA NCH 709_B_1 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_2 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_3 4.580 1.66 7 Southern Company

HARLLEE BRANCH 709_B_4 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

JACK MCDONOUGH 710_B_MB1 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

JACK MCDONOUGH 710_B_MB2 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

MCMANUS 715_B_1 3.159 2.620 Southern Company

MCMANUS 715_B_2 3.159 2.620 Southern Company

MITCHELL 727_B_3 4.580 2.500 Southern Company

YATES 728_B_Y2BR 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

YATES 728_B_Y3BR 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

YATES 7 28_B_Y4BR 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

YATES 728_B_Y5BR 4.580 1.667 Southern Company

KRAFT 733_B_1 4.580 1.270 Southern Compa ny

KRAFT 733_B_2 4.580 1.270 Southern Company

KRAFT 733_B_3 4.580 1.270 Southern Company

KRAFT 733_B_4 0.800 0.001 Southern Company

RIVERSIDE 734_B_11 2.632 0.001 Southern Company

RIVERSIDE 734_B_12 3.159 0.001 Southern Company

RIVERSIDE 734_B_4 2.632 0.001 Southern Company

RIVERSIDE 734_B_5 2.632 0.001 Southern Company

RIVERSIDE 734_B_6 2.632 0.001 Southern Company

GORGAS 8_B_10 4.000 1.667 Southern Company

GORGAS 8_B_6 4.000 2.500 Southern Company

GORGAS 8_B_7 4.000 2.500 Southern Company

GORGAS 8_B_8 4.000 1.667 Southern Company

GORGAS 8_B_9 4.000 1.667 Southern Company

• Data Source shows the names of sheets in NEEDS

- NODA

- VISTAS

- Aug18Rev.xls, provided by Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor f or Emissions Inventories.Table A 5 Changes made to Particulate Matter (PM) Control Installations on Existing Units

Plant Name Unique ID PM Control (NEEDS NODA) PM Control (VISTAS) Data Sources *

G G ALLEN 2718_B_3 Hot

- side ESP Cold

- side ESP NC

- WV

- SC

G G ALLEN 2718_B_5 Hot

- side ESP Cold

- side ESP NC

- WV

- SC

WESTON 4078_B_3 Hot

- side ESP + Fabric Filter Fabric Filter Wisconsin
* Data Sources shows the name of sheets in NEEDS

- NODA

- VISTAS

- Aug18Rev.xls , provided by Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.Table A 6 Changes made to Summer Net Dependable Capacity (MW)

Plant Name Unique ID Capacity (NEEDS NODA) Capacity (VISTAS) Data Source*

VACA_SC_Combined Cycle 077_C_077 1317 807 SC

CRIST 641_B_1 24 0 ** Southern Company
Lansing Smith A274_G_A274 500 530 Southern Company

Atkinson 700_G_5A 32 15.3 Southern Company

Atkinson 700_G_5B 32 15.3 Southern Company
Dahlberg 7709_G_10 75 80 Southern Company
Dahlberg 7709_G_9 75 80 Southern Company

FRANKLIN A7840_G_A331 570 63 0 Southern Company

Mill Creek A294_G_A294 320 326.8 NC

- WV

- SC

Mill Creek A295_G_A295 240 245.1 NC

- WV

- SC

Mill Creek A296_G_A296 80 81.7 NC

- WV

- SC

SCE&G Hardeeville 3286_C_2 170 SC

SCE&G Hardeeville 3286_C_ 3 170 SC

SCE&G Hardeeville 3286_C_ 4 170 SC

C ross 3 130_C_3 660 SC

* Data Source shows the name of sheets in NEEDS

- NODA

- VISTAS

- Aug18Rev.xls , provided by Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories. “SC” reflects the spreadsheet CopyofSCIPMdata.xls.

** Zero capacity denotes t hat the unit was retired in 2002.Table A 7 Changes made to Heat Rate (Btu/kWh)

Plant Name Unique ID ORIS Code BGCI Unit ID Heat Rate (NEEDS NODA) Heat Rate (VISTAS) Data Source*

ALLEN S KING 1915_B_1 1915 B 1 8879 9229 Minnesota

* Data Source shows the name of sheets in NEEDS

- NODA

- VISTAS

- Aug18Rev.xls , provided by Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.Table A 8 Changes made to Unit ID

Plant Name Unique ID ORIS Code BGCI Unit ID (NEEDS NODA) Unit ID (VISTAS) Data Source*

Tal bot County Energy A397_G_A397 7916 G 397 1 Oglethorpe
Talbot County Energy A398_G_A398 7916 G 398 2 Oglethorpe
Talbot County Energy A399_G_A399 7916 G 399 3

- 4 Oglethorpe
Talbot County Energy A400_G_A400 7916 G 400 5

- 6 Oglethorpe

Mill Creek A294_G_A294 7981 G 294 1

- 4 NC

- WV

- SC

Mill Creek A295_G_A295 7981 G 295 5

- 7 NC

- WV

- SC

Mill Creek A296_G_A296 7981 G 296 8 NC

- WV

- SC

* Data Source shows the name of sheets in NEEDS

- NODA

- VISTAS

- Aug18Rev.xls , provided by Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissi ons Inventories.Table A9 Duke and Progress Energy SO 2 Control Plan for North Carolina Clean Smokestacks Rule

Unit Technology Operation Date Company

Asheville 1 Scrubber 2005 Progress Energy

Asheville 2 Scrubber 2006 Progress Energy
Cape Fear 5 Scrubb er 2012 Progress Energy
Cape Fear 6 Scrubber 2011 Progress Energy
Mayo 1 Scrubber 2008 Progress Energy

Roxboro 1 Scrubber 2009 Progress Energy

Roxboro 2 Scrubber 2007 Progress Energy

Roxboro 3 Scrubber 2007 Progress Energy

Roxboro 4 Scrubber 2007 Pro gress Energy

Sutton 3 Scrubber 2012 Progress Energy

Allen 1 Scrubber 2011 Duke Power

Allen 2 Scrubber 2011 Duke Power

Allen 3 Scrubber 2011 Duke Power

Allen 4 Scrubber 2012 Duke Power

Allen 5 Scrubber 2012 Duke Power

Belews Creek 1 Scrubber 2008 Duk e Power

Belews Creek 2 Scrubber 2008 Duke Power

Cliffside 5 Scrubber 2009 Duke Power

Marshall 1 Scrubber 2007 Duke Power

Marshall 2 Scrubber 2007 Duke Power

Marshall 3 Scrubber 2006 Duke Power

Marshall 4 Scrubber 2006 Duke Power Source: Gregory Ste lla, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Inventories.Table A 10 Duke and Progress Energy NO x Control Plan for North Carolina Clean Smokestacks Rule

Unit Technology Operation Date Company

Asheville 1 SCR 2009 Progress Energy

Lee 2 ROFA 2007 Progress Energy

Lee 3 SCR 2010 Progress Energy

Sutton 2 ROFA 2006 Progress Energy

Allen 1 SNCR 2003 Duke Power

Allen 2 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Allen 3 SNCR 2005 Duke Power

Allen 4 SNCR 2006 Duke Power

Allen 5 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Belews Creek 1 SCR 2003 Duke P ower
Belews Creek 2 SCR 2004 Duke Power

Buck 3 SNCR 2009 Duke Power

Buck 4 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Buck 5 SNCR 2006 Duke Power

Buck 6 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Cliffside 1 SNCR 2009 Duke Power

Cliffside 2 SNCR 2009 Duke Power

Cliffside 3 SNCR 2008 Duke Pow er
Cliffside 4 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Cliffside 5 SCR 2002 Duke Power

Dan River 1 SNCR 2009 Duke Power

Dan River 2 SNCR 2009 Duke Power

Dan River 3 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Marshall 1 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Marshall 2 SNCR 2006 Duke Power

Marshall 3 SNCR 2 005 Duke Power

Marshall 4 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Riverbend 4 SNCR 2007 Duke Power

Riverbend 5 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Riverbend 6 SNCR 2008 Duke Power

Riverbend 7 SNCR 2007 Duke Power Source: Gregory Stella, VISTAS Technical Advisor for Emissions Invento ries.**2. Emission Results**

Tables A11 , A12, A13 and A1 4 present the Base Case and the CAIR Case N O x and S O 2 emissions by state and

season in 2009 and 2018 run years.Table A11 State L evel Base Case NO x Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

NO x Emissio n (Base Case) Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

C AIR Affected States

Alabama 97.93 100.12 34.06 34.89

Arkansas 23.92 24.68 19.73 19.96

District Of Columbia 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.05

Delaware 6.09 7.30 2.78 3.42

Florida 80.78 86.48 67.84 72.61

Geo rgia 92.95 94.65 38.95 34.29

Iowa 39.67 47.64 30.90 36.59

Illinois 101.87 119.29 27.74 37.91

Indiana 176.21 183.22 61.12 61.74

Kansas 46.35 50.19 36.58 39.32
Kentucky 131.21 132.43 47.76 49.80

Louisiana 27.55 28.46 22.92 23.26

Massachusetts 9 .80 11.69 5.64 8.74
Maryland 48.93 50.40 9.07 9.88
Michigan 80.77 85.49 35.64 34.26

Minnesota 39.60 44.65 30.21 34.14

Missouri 84.20 86.01 33.32 30.67
Mississippi 20.98 21.97 17.68 18.21

North Carolina 40.99 39.94 25.74 24.73
New Jersey 10.93 13.57 4.76 5.79

New York 31.75 30.74 18.00 18.79

Ohio 221.12 234.60 50.99 47.99
Pennsylvania 139.63 144.99 58.57 54.52

South Carolina 33.44 35.53 17.06 19.70

Tennessee 88.26 88.30 18.75 24.15

Texas 91.74 91.77 92.76 102.30
Virginia 44.06 37. 63 21.15 19.35

Wisconsin 44.08 44.81 35.52 35.59
West Virginia 146.12 147.16 27.86 23.37

Total 2

, 000.92 2

, 083.74 893.12 926.01

Non C AIR States

Arizona 43.51 45.10 35.05 35.71

California 21.46 18.71 13.13 12.91

Colorado 38.20 39.43 30.04 30.90

Connecticut 3.56 4.49 2.63 2.81

Idaho 0.85 0.76 0.65 0.34

Maine 1.03 1.04 0.81 0.82

Montana 21.40 21.42 16.92 17.01

North Dakota 39.97 39.97 31.67 31.67

Nebraska 27.26 27.49 21.75 21.96
New Hampshire 1.33 1.65 0.74 1.18

New Mexico 40.80 40. 90 32.70 32.97

Nevada 18.94 21.12 10.94 16.55

Oklahoma 41.56 41.86 36.02 38.41NO x Emissio n (Base Case) Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018
Oregon 7.54 7.79 5.89 6.07

Rhode Island 0.29 0.32 0.23 0.30

South Dakota 8.10 8.11 6.44 6.44

Utah 33.87 33.83 26.88 26.43

Vermont 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02
Washington 16.48 14.94 12.19 11.79
Wyoming 45.24 45.24 35.93 35.93

Total 411.39 414.19 320.62 330.23

National Total 2

, 412.31 2

, 497.93 1

, 213.74 1

, 256.23Table A1 2 State Level Base Case SO 2 Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

SO 2 Emission (Base Case) Winter Sum mer

2009 2018 2009 2018

C AIR Affected States

Alabama 279.95 209.76 185.64 165.55

Arkansas 45.95 45.95 36.49 36.49

District Of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Delaware 22.94 26.88 15.11 17.45

Florida 122.20 120.04 97.19 95.45 Georgia 328.97 310. 23 253.11 243.79

Iowa 86.91 101.85 66.32 78.32

Illinois 215.50 242.21 130.41 177.13

Indiana 434.76 300.46 291.49 228.01

Kansas 45.06 47.83 36.59 37.99
Kentucky 279.82 241.21 203.42 188.21

Louisiana 55.29 55.29 43.92 43.92

Massachusetts 9.55 1 0.21 2.21 6.86
Maryland 179.99 187.19 129.98 143.59
Michigan 219.48 227.46 160.86 177.17

Minnesota 52.19 53.20 39.47 39.43

Missouri 153.41 158.24 110.96 119.58
Mississippi 47.72 47.72 37.90 37.90

North Carolina 109.66 80.15 72.83 53.68

New Je rsey 31.74 19.49 22.99 14.08

New York 100.81 89.14 48.13 53.50

Ohio 860.12 647.74 584.09 460.62
Pennsylvania 525.90 503.94 359.82 361.58

South Carolina 93.19 99.82 70.44 79.21

Tennessee 274.69 184.91 161.76 138.75

Texas 221.74 231.04 184.26 188 .83
Virginia 133.86 103.85 87.09 77.75

Wisconsin 87.01 85.93 69.31 67.53
West Virginia 349.02 274.96 249.54 208.00

Total 5

, 367.45 4

, 706.71 3

, 751.31 3

, 540.37

Non C AIR States

Arizona 33.81 28.38 26.85 22.54

California 3.64 3.64 2.88 2.88

Color ado 51.13 51.13 40.59 40.61

Connecticut 3.62 3.62 2.85 2.85

Idaho 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02

Maine 3.01 3.01 2.42 2.42

Montana 11.32 12.90 8.95 10.28

North Dakota 74.59 74.54 58.98 58.94

Nebraska 39.52 39.92 31.48 31.63
New Hampshire 5.20 4.62 2.26 2.98

New Mexico 29.49 29.49 23.42 23.42

Nevada 12.09 13.32 6.14 10.25

Oklahoma 65.56 65.56 52.08 52.08SO 2 Emission (Base Case) Winter Sum mer

2009 2018 2009 2018
Oregon 5.67 5.67 4.50 4.50

Rhode Island 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

South Dakota 6.74 6.74 5.35 5.35

Utah 29.65 20.86 23.43 15.04

Vermont 0.02 0. 02 0.01 0.01
Washington 6.63 6.65 5.15 5.17
Wyoming 41.73 28.93 33.14 22.98

Total 423.46 399.05 330.53 313.96

National Total 5

, 790.90 5

, 105.76 4

, 081.84 3

, 854.33Table A1 3 State L evel CAIR Case NO x Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

NO x Emission (CAIR Case) Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

C AIR Affected States

Alabama 96.01 21.06 36.32 18.89

Arkansas 24.01 17.81 19.73 14.41

District Of Columbia 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.04

Delaware 4.92 3.86 0.92 3.01

Florida 80.05 30.71 67.84 28.83 Georgia 88.13 33.33 31.30 32.22

Iowa 39.36 23.69 30.64 16.83

Illinois 108.01 38.49 33.62 30.78

Indiana 174.47 49.88 64.17 37.28

Kansas 46.51 17.41 36.48 14.84
Kentucky 129.41 36.28 47.90 28.43

Louisiana 27.80 16.91 22.92 14.01

Massachusetts 10.03 8. 38 6.43 6.23
Maryland 46.83 7.76 11.25 6.58
Michigan 80.25 39.64 35.94 30.88

Minnesota 40.35 21.80 30.79 17.02

Missouri 82.31 50.25 36.39 27.68
Mississippi 20.98 5.68 17.78 5.11

North Carolina 40.69 33.56 26.50 26.49
New Jersey 11.08 6.73 4.2 7 5.64

New York 25.18 22.18 19.25 17.99

Ohio 214.10 47.83 43.53 34.32
Pennsylvania 129.93 42.08 54.03 33.21

South Carolina 34.01 20.39 16.20 16.00

Tennessee 87.13 15.77 17.44 16.68

Texas 91.58 82.32 92.49 90.41
Virginia 39.54 23.15 23.53 17.1 5

Wisconsin 41.88 21.25 33.52 16.56
West Virginia 145.07 24.52 29.50 17.70

Total 1

, 959.60 762.79 890.73 625.24

Non C AIR States

Arizona 43.50 45.11 35.04 35.68

California 20.40 18.52 13.00 12.91

Colorado 38.14 39.55 30.05 30.88

Connecticut 3. 90 5.06 3.00 3.50

Idaho 0.85 0.78 0.65 0.34

Maine 1.03 1.08 0.76 0.85

Montana 21.40 21.42 16.98 17.01

North Dakota 38.73 39.97 29.27 31.76

Nebraska 27.43 27.52 21.83 22.08
New Hampshire 0.97 1.71 0.75 1.35

New Mexico 40.80 40.92 32.70 32.98

Nevada 19.96 22.36 11.06 17.60

Oklahoma 41.64 42.42 36.06 40.57NO x Emission (CAIR Case) Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018
Oregon 7.54 7.79 5.89 6.07

Rhode Island 0.29 0.34 0.21 0.30

South Dakota 8.10 8.11 6.44 6.45

Utah 33.87 33.83 26.86 26.43

Vermont 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
Washington 16.48 14.94 12.1 9 11.78
Wyoming 45.24 45.24 35.93 35.93

Total 410.29 416.69 318.68 334.51

National Total 2

, 369.89 1

, 179.48 1

, 209.41 959.75Table A14 State L evel CAIR Case SO 2 Emissions by Season (Thousand Tons)

SO 2 Emission (CAIR Case) Winter Summer

2009 2018 20 09 2018

C AIR Affected States

Alabama 190.85 125.61 124.00 100.91

Arkansas 45.95 45.95 36.49 36.49

District Of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Delaware 16.78 9.84 5.14 7.09

Florida 110.87 70.51 89.28 56.09 Georgia 244.73 117.05 149.70 104.56

Iow a 89.51 97.92 68.86 71.77

Illinois 141.81 149.61 93.99 113.51

Indiana 200.81 182.52 140.39 139.08

Kansas 44.63 40.60 35.76 32.84
Kentucky 197.05 127.58 145.63 98.20

Louisiana 34.59 18.80 27.47 14.93

Massachusetts 10.70 9.48 2.93 6.73
Maryland 41.64 14.40 25.23 10.01
Michigan 216.30 221.63 157.75 174.22

Minnesota 45.46 47.48 35.48 35.41

Missouri 148.86 151.22 110.16 118.11
Mississippi 47.72 28.96 37.90 23.00

North Carolina 80.70 41.41 51.49 36.93
New Jersey 19.09 11.35 15.17 8.65

New York 57.16 26.70 37.60 20.71

Ohio 259.36 122.94 144.93 88.31
Pennsylvania 128.67 74.04 77.16 57.49

South Carolina 85.48 85.74 58.09 66.81

Tennessee 168.50 53.32 111.44 50.29

Texas 216.76 195.36 178.90 159.08
Virginia 89.83 66.57 51.09 49.68

Wisconsin 83.88 78.63 66.32 62.03
West Virginia 154.15 64.86 92.70 47.07

Total 3

, 171.82 2

, 280.08 2

, 171.02 1

, 789.98

Non C AIR States

Arizona 33.81 28.38 26.85 22.54

California 3.64 3.64 2.88 2.88

Colorado 50.79 51.16 40.28 40.61

Connecticut 3 .62 3.62 2.58 2.85

Idaho 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02

Maine 3.01 3.01 2.10 2.42

Montana 11.32 13.00 9.01 10.33

North Dakota 71.08 74.54 54.63 59.20

Nebraska 39.82 39.92 31.63 31.70
New Hampshire 0.92 4.47 0.70 3.52

New Mexico 29.49 29.49 23.42 23.42

Nevada 12.90 14.33 6.23 11.09

Oklahoma 65.56 65.56 52.08 52.08SO 2 Emission (CAIR Case) Winter Summer

2009 2018 20 09 2018
Oregon 5.67 5.67 4.50 4.50

Rhode Island 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

South Dakota 6.74 6.74 5.35 5.35

Utah 29.65 20.86 23.35 15.04

Vermont 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01
Washington 6.11 6.65 4.80 5. 17
Wyoming 39.68 28.93 31.52 22.98

Total 413.87 400.02 321.96 315.72

National Total 3

, 585.68 2

, 680.10 2

, 492.97 2

, 105.71**3. Generation Results**
Tables A15 and A16 present the generation in the Base Case and the CAIR Case by state and season in 2009 an d 2018 run years.Table A15 State L evel Base Case Generation by Season (GWh)

Base Case Generation Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

C AIR Affected States

Alabama 89,306 107,340 71,273 89,828

Arkansas 27,458 35,937 27,331 29,377

District Of Colum bia

- 70

- 113

Delaware 3,688 4,873 2,754 4,030

Florida 103,348 140,092 91,525 117,000 Georgia 93,099 103,667 73,028 86,929

Iowa 26,718 32,128 20,016 23,757

Illinois 111,860 120,671 79,329 91,331

Indiana 78,544 86,210 57,036 65,667

Kansas 26, 507 27,819 21,332 22,583
Kentucky 61,480 62,605 46,396 48,451

Louisiana 35,891 48,346 35,855 38,090

Massachusetts 31,527 37,098 22,173 27,421
Maryland 31,487 33,118 22,747 26,002
Michigan 61,566 75,353 45,410 54,723

Minnesota 27,529 31,431 21,1 04 23,976

Missouri 51,304 54,766 38,644 42,737
Mississippi 20,631 32,250 24,165 29,593

North Carolina 72,173 77,731 54,210 58,315
New Jersey 31,669 38,312 26,922 29,698

New York 86,175 90,403 66,311 69,245

Ohio 98,345 111,448 69,610 80,018

Pe nnsylvania 129,591 140,974 93,686 101,509

South Carolina 57,536 66,909 47,731 54,364

Tennessee 57,630 59,073 40,526 43,453

Texas 175,132 192,596 176,889 210,649
Virginia 44,517 55,805 34,038 42,987

Wisconsin 37,353 40,072 29,408 31,217

West Vir ginia 60,407 61,029 45,922 47,604

Total 1,732,468 1,968,124 1,385,371 1,590,666

Non C AIR States

Arizona 68,796 84,020 58,556 66,427

California 153,862 193,482 115,891 148,755

Colorado 24,277 29,820 17,665 22,200

Connecticut 18,145 20,347 12,832 13,661

Idaho 6,535 6,859 5,123 4,814

Maine 4,510 4,554 3,259 3,284

Montana 14,651 15,017 11,972 12,277

North Dakota 15,999 15,999 12,683 12,688

Nebraska 17,523 17,985 14,926 15,717
New Hampshire 19,201 18,995 14,611 14,436

New Mexico 16,508 1 7,492 13,485 14,417

Nevada 21,432 24,996 15,590 20,097

Oklahoma 42,002 45,145 36,058 40,794Base Case Generation Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018
Oregon 34,193 37,710 25,959 28,498

Rhode Island 2,822 3,045 1,865 2,474

South Dakota 5,103 5,116 4,200 4,210

Utah 18,558 18,525 14,807 14,561

Vermont 3,328 3,284 2,102 1,985
Washington 61,086 64,342 43,874 47,400
Wyoming 24,650 24,627 19,574 19,555

Total 573,182 651,360 445,030 508,249

National Total 2,305,650 2,619,484 1,830,401 2,098,915Table A16 State L evel CAIR Case Generation by Season (GWh)

CAIR Case Generation Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018

CAIR Affected States

Alabama 94,570 114,813 74,254 91,185

Arkansas 28,520 38,336 27,342 30,538

District Of Columbia

- 164 27 140

Delaware 4,109 4,888 1,395 3,816

Florida 103,047 134,673 91,525 114,079 Georgia 90,975 106,074 68,713 87,944

Iowa 26,654 32,155 20,160 22,069

Illinois 113,576 118,442 83,009 91,406

Indiana 77,812 85,811 59,219 64,105

Kansas 26,553 25,090 21,262 21,729
Kentucky 60,623 61,425 45,949 47, 837

Louisiana 39,178 47,708 35,792 37,296

Massachusetts 32,086 35,865 22,315 26,056
Maryland 30,432 33,919 22,226 26,140
Michigan 61,409 77,361 45,712 55,464

Minnesota 28,657 31,549 22,190 24,725

Missouri 50,909 54,005 38,878 43,636
Mississip pi 20,654 38,386 26,053 31,804

North Carolina 72,011 76,972 54,051 59,626
New Jersey 32,728 37,732 26,430 30,620

New York 86,621 90,452 67,306 70,406

Ohio 94,457 109,773 66,893 80,432
Pennsylvania 125,813 135,339 93,940 100,257

South Carolina 5 9,092 67,948 47,929 54,154

Tennessee 57,255 55,011 40,017 42,531

Texas 174,956 188,405 176,614 205,557
Virginia 42,300 55,560 34,556 41,982

Wisconsin 37,205 41,005 28,850 31,286
West Virginia 59,826 59,948 43,305 46,823

Total 1,732,029 1,958,80 6 1,385,910 1,583,642

Non C AIR States

Arizona 68,764 84,088 58,527 66,182

California 153,862 193,060 115,905 148,764

Colorado 23,897 29,789 17,750 22,086

Connecticut 17,851 20,146 12,783 13,817

Idaho 6,535 6,907 5,123 4,809

Maine 4,510 5,032 3 ,213 3,605

Montana 14,651 15,018 11,996 12,275

North Dakota 15,380 15,999 11,862 12,738

Nebraska 17,566 18,061 14,947 15,816
New Hampshire 18,921 19,856 14,663 15,201

New Mexico 16,514 17,636 13,485 14,519

Nevada 21,896 25,564 15,641 20,582

O klahoma 42,459 50,227 36,383 45,539CAIR Case Generation Winter Summer

2009 2018 2009 2018
Oregon 34,193 37,678 25,959 28,474

Rhode Island 2,822 3,032 1,651 2,410

South Dakota 5,103 5,116 4,200 4,220

Utah 18,558 18,525 14,796 14,561

Vermont 3,328 3,446 2,102 2,096
Washington 61,086 64,281 43,874 47 ,356
Wyoming 24,650 24,627 19,574 19,555

Total 572,547 658,087 444,434 514,605

National Total 2,304,577 2,616,893 1,830,343 2,098,247**4**

**. Cost Results** 
Tables A17, A18, A19 and A20 present the fixed operation and maintenance cost (FOM), variable oper ation and maintenance cost (VOM), fuel cost and the capital cost in the Base Case and the CAIR Case by IPM model region and season in 2009 and 2018 run years respectively.Table A17 FOM Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

FOM Cost by Region Base Ca se CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

AZNM 999.8 1,173.9 999.8 1,173.9

CALI 1,399.3 1,767.7 1,397.1 1,767.6

DSNY 554.3 365.1 559.0 386.4

ECAO 3,163.2 3,282.9 3,310.1 3,583.2

ENTG 1,172.8 1,351.0 1,177.5 1,361.8

ERCT 1,905.2 2,084.9 1,905.2 2,097.9

FRCC 1,500.1 1,570.0 1,504.2 1,595.8

LILC 71.1 89.7 79.1 92.5

MACE 1,712.7 1,859.8 1,698.8 1,850.0

MACS 474.3 504.5 503.3 548.3

MACW 843.0 961.8 849.6 989.5

MANO 2,462.9 2,942.4 2,466.9 2,949.6

MAPP 1,282.3 1,352.2 1,276.4 1,347.3

MECS 525 .5 625.8 525.5 631.5

NENG 1,230.3 1,246.7 1,233.3 1,247.1

NWPE 512.5 539.5 518.4 545.3

NYC 145.0 162.1 145.0 167.5

PNW 906.4 988.3 906.4 988.1

RMPA 295.2 305.0 295.5 305.3

SOU 1,490.9 1,674.5 1,510.6 1,777.1

SPPN 477.7 564.3 477.7 566.9

SPP S 651.9 715.0 656.3 722.2

TVA 1,380.2 1,469.9 1,384.2 1,508.4

UPNY 726.7 792.6 713.3 782.1

VACA 2,764.7 3,099.6 2,756.4 3,096.6

WUMS 461.8 494.1 461.8 495.5

National Total 29,109.7 31,983.2 29,311.5 32,577.6Table A18 VOM Cost by IPM Model Regio n (Million 1999$)

VOM Cost by Region Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

AZNM 301.4 349.7 301.3 349.7

CALI 525.1 677.9 523.7 677.6

DSNY 41.0 34.1 41.4 51.4

ECAO 1,218.5 1,316.6 1,378.1 1,883.4

ENTG 158.6 195.1 170.2 228.0

ERCT 493.4 602. 5 492.9 621.6

FRCC 303.2 404.1 307.8 466.1

LILC 24.9 39.5 24.4 33.6

MACE 140.5 166.4 137.6 174.4

MACS 70.6 83.1 97.8 141.1

MACW 188.1 203.1 226.7 300.4

MANO 313.9 359.5 335.8 408.4

MAPP 306.1 337.8 309.5 353.1

MECS 146.3 181.0 145.8 211.6

NENG 174.5 205.0 176.8 205.3

NWPE 235.2 249.6 236.7 252.7

NYC 12.1 25.5 12.1 30.0

PNW 93.3 126.3 93.3 126.0

RMPA 117.5 128.0 117.2 127.9

SOU 409.5 512.1 431.8 720.1

SPPN 147.0 158.1 147.4 161.5

SPPS 201.2 231.2 204.0 242.3

TVA 286.2 312.0 290.1 400.3

UPNY 81.8 90.4 85.0 91.1

VACA 570.6 679.9 602.2 720.4

WUMS 110.0 138.3 111.4 143.2

National Total 6,670.4 7,807.0 7,001.0 9,121.3Table A19 Fuel Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

Fuel Cost by Region Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

AZNM 2,231.5 2,884.8 2,296.0 2,912.2

CALI 3,804.4 5,249.7 3,883.0 5,266.9

DSNY 512.8 531.4 537.3 642.6

ECAO 5,452.7 6,207.7 5,346.3 5,844.2

ENTG 1,700.8 2,398.6 1,817.2 2,388.2

ERCT 4,950.1 5,835.0 5,121.9 5,812.3

FRCC 2,979.2 4,480.9 3,045.0 4,282.9

LILC 400.7 530.3 407.5 454.6

MACE 1,106.4 1,453.7 1,195.5 1,461.6

MACS 528.2 599.7 502.4 599.4

MACW 1,039.5 1,258.4 1,039.9 1,176.8

MANO 2,073.1 2,192.0 2,133.0 2,158.4

MAPP 1,560.0 1,666.6 1,561.8 1,676.2

MECS 1,070.6 1,322.5 1,075.2 1,434.1

NENG 1,868.1 2,291.3 1,915.8 2,297.8

NWPE 679.2 643.8 687.8 659.6

NYC 313.2 459.5 326.0 512.2

PNW 1,078.6 1,326.2 1,126.8 1,333.3

RMPA 429.3 596.2 426.8 595.4

SOU 3,933.6 5,195.6 4,146.3 5,399.1

SPPN 678.0 731.7 683.1 726.5

SPPS 1,908.5 2,197.0 1,952.0 2,287.2

TVA 1,633.0 1,868.4 1,675.8 1,972.9

UPNY 599.3 758.0 655.3 703.8

VACA 3,057.0 3,800.8 3,135.3 3,928.7

WUMS 625.4 748.5 632.9 732.9

National Total 46,213.0 57,228.2 47,325.9 57,259.8Table A20 Capital Cost by IPM Model Region (Million 1999$)

Capital Cost by Region Base Case CAIR Case

2009 2018 2009 2018

AZNM 0.0 114.8 0.0 114.8

CALI 375.3 1287.1 454.1 1290.4

DSNY 0.0 0.7 0.0 73.3

ECAO 97.2 226.9 505.9 1164.9

ENTG 3.3 4.4 10.3 36.7

ERCT 0 .9 978.4 0.6 1029.3

FRCC 13.3 455.4 25.2 540.3

LILC 54.0 167.9 62.4 143.9

MACE 4.2 22.1 4.2 33.8

MACS 18.2 134.0 94.7 261.9

MACW 0.0 0.3 80.9 162.8

MANO 2.7 21.6 35.4 71.3

MAPP 52.9 52.9 52.9 68.7

MECS 0.0 212.4 0.0 237.9

NENG 76.3 160.0 87.3 163.9

NWPE 0.0 23.0 0.0 23.0

NYC 0.0 103.9 0.0 137.1

PNW 5.5 183.8 5.5 182.2

RMPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

SOU 4.6 412.9 55.5 770.0

SPPN 5.3 28.0 5.3 51.0

SPPS 0.0 142.9 12.2 171.8

TVA 0.0 10.4 11.8 135.2

UPNY 0.0 4.1 11.6 23.2

VACA 232.6 6 47.5 221.1 667.1

WUMS 10.3 138.8 10.2 149.8

National Total 956.6 5

, 534.2 1,747.2 7

, 704.1