Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Notices 21263 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2Commissioner F. Scott Kieff did not participate 

in this investigation. 

8100, Salt Lake City, Utah 84138; 

telephone (801) 524–3781; facsimile 

(801) 524–3807; email at gknowles@

usbr.gov at least five (5) days prior to the 

call. Any written comments received 

will be provided to the AMWG 

members. 

Public Disclosure of Comments 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: March 30, 2015. 

Glen Knowles, 

Chief, Adaptive Management Group, 

Environmental Resources Division, Upper 

Colorado Regional Office, Salt Lake City, 

Utah. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08923 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4332–90–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–459 and 731– 

TA–1155 (Review)] 

Commodity Matchbooks From India; 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)), that revocation of the 

countervailing duty order and 

antidumping duty order on commodity 

matchbooks from India would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on November 3, 2014 (79 FR 

65186) and determined on February 6, 

2015 that it would conduct expedited 

reviews (80 FR 9480, February 23, 

2015). 

The Commission completed and filed 

its determinations in these reviews on 

April 6, 2015. The views of the 

Commission are contained in USITC 

Publication 4525 (April 2015), entitled 

Commodity Matchbooks from India: 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–459 and 

731–TA–1155 (Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 2, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08826 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 701–TA–530 

(Preliminary)] 

Supercalendered Paper From Canada; 

Determination 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigation, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), 

that there is a reasonable indication that 

an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

of supercalendered paper, provided for 

in subheading 4802.61.30 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States, that are alleged to be 

subsidized by the government of 

Canada.2

Commencement of Final Phase 

Investigation 

Pursuant to section 207.18 of the 

Commission’s rules, the Commission 

also gives notice of the commencement 

of the final phase of its investigation. 

The Commission will issue a final phase 

notice of scheduling, which will be 

published in the Federal Register as 

provided in section 207.21 of the 

Commission’s rules, upon notice from 

the Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Commerce’’) of an affirmative 

preliminary determination in the 

investigation under section 703(b) of the 

Act, or, if the preliminary determination 

is negative, upon notice of an 

affirmative final determination in that 

investigation under section 705(a) of the 

Act. Parties that filed entries of 

appearance in the preliminary phase of 

the investigation need not enter a 

separate appearance for the final phase 

of the investigation. Industrial users, 

and, if the merchandise under 

investigation is sold at the retail level, 

representative consumer organizations 

have the right to appear as parties in 

Commission antidumping and 

countervailing duty investigations. The 

Secretary will prepare a public service 

list containing the names and addresses 

of all persons, or their representatives, 

who are parties to the investigation. 

Background 

On February 26, 2015, the Coalition 

for Fair Paper Imports, which is an ad 

hoc association of U.S. producers that 

includes Madison Paper Industries, Inc., 

Madison, ME and Verso Corp., 

Memphis, TN, filed a petition with the 

Commission and Commerce, alleging 

that an industry in the United States is 

materially injured or threatened with 

material injury by reason of subsidized 

imports of supercalendered paper from 

Canada. Accordingly, effective February 

26, 2015, the Commission, pursuant to 

section 703(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. 1671b(a)), instituted 

countervailing duty investigation No. 

701–TA–530 (Preliminary). 

Notice of the institution of the 

Commission’s investigation and of a 

public conference to be held in 

connection therewith was given by 

posting copies of the notice in the Office 

of the Secretary, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

and by publishing the notice in the 

Federal Register of March 5, 2015 (80 

FR 12036). The conference was held in 

Washington, DC, on March 19, 2015, 

and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission made this 

determination pursuant to section 

703(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1671b(a)). It completed and filed 

its determination in this investigation 

on April 14, 2015. The views of the 

Commission are contained in USITC 

Publication 4529 (April 2015), entitled 

Supercalendered Paper from Canada: 

Investigation No. 701–TA–530 

(Preliminary). 

By order of the Commission. 

Dated: April 14, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08882 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

Meeting of the CJIS Advisory Policy 

Board 

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of Investigation 

(FBI), Department of Justice. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES