alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofIndependent Asset Management Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

November 6, 2006
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30392

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUDY B. ALLBRITTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:03-CR-10025-1

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Judy B. Allbritton was convicted after a jury trial on four

counts of making false entries in a bank book, in violation of

18 U.S.C. § 1005, and four counts of misapplication of monies, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656. Allbritton did not file a timely

notice of appeal. Instead, she filed several post-judgment

motions seeking extensions of time to file a notice of appeal,

reconsideration of the district court’s denial of an extension of

time, and an out-of-time appeal. The district court denied each

of Allbritton’s post-judgment motions. She then filed a notice
No. 05-30392

-2-

of appeal purporting to appeal from the district court’s orders

but has not briefed the denial of her motions. Allbritton’s

notice of appeal was not timely as to any of the district court’s

orders. The appeal is therefore dismissed for failure to comply

with the rule requiring a timely notice of appeal. See Burnley

v. City of San Antonio, 470 F.3d 189, 192 n.1 (5th Cir. 2006);

FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### Rosario Romero, Respondent, v City of New York, Respondent, and Rong Chen Mo et al., Appellants.

[774 NYS2d 735]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Rong Chen Mo and Cui Juan He appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), dated June 16, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The plaintiff tripped and fell on a sidewalk abutting the property of the appellants, Rong Chen Mo and Cui Juan He. An abutting landowner will not be held liable to a pedestrian passing by on a public sidewalk unless the landowner created the defective condition or caused the defect to occur because of some special use *(see Kaufman v Silver,*90 NY2d 204 [1997]; *Dos Santos v Peixoto,*293 AD2d 566 [2002]; *Gaynor v City of New York,*259 AD2d 733 [1999]).

Here, the appellants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that they neither created the alleged defective condition nor caused the defect to occur because of some special use *(see Ivanyushkina v City of New York,*300 AD2d 544 [2002]; *Winberry v City of New York,*257 AD2d 618 [1999]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defect was caused by the appellants’ special use of the sidewalk as a driveway *(see Ivanyushkina v City of New York, supra; Winberry v City of New York, supra).*Accordingly, the *658Supreme Court should have granted the appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3808 

To require any Federal or State court to recognize any notarization made 

by a notary public licensed by a State other than the State where 

the court is located when such notarization occurs in or affects interstate 

commerce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 14, 2009 

Mr. ADERHOLT (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, 

and Mr. CASTLE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require any Federal or State court to recognize any 

notarization made by a notary public licensed by a State 

other than the State where the court is located when 

such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interstate Recognition 

5 of Notarizations Act of 2009’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3808 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF NOTARIZATIONS IN FEDERAL 

2 COURTS. 

3 Each Federal court shall recognize any lawful notari4 zation made by a notary public licensed or commissioned 

5 under the laws of a State other than the State where the 

6 Federal court is located if— 

7 (1) such notarization occurs in or affects inter8 state commerce; and 

9 (2)(A) a seal of office, as symbol of the notary 

10 public’s authority, is used in the notarization; or 

11 (B) in the case of an electronic record, the seal 

12 information is securely attached to, or logically asso13 ciated with, the electronic record so as to render the 

14 record tamper-resistant. 

15 SEC. 3. RECOGNITION OF NOTARIZATIONS IN STATE 

16 COURTS. 

17 Each court that operates under the jurisdiction of a 

18 State shall recognize any lawful notarization made by a 

19 notary public licensed or commissioned under the laws of 

20 a State other than the State where the court is located 

21 if— 

22 (1) such notarization occurs in or affects inter23 state commerce; and 

24 (2)(A) a seal of office, as symbol of the notary 

25 public’s authority, is used in the notarization; or 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3808 IH

1 (B) in the case of an electronic record, the seal 

2 information is securely attached to, or logically asso3 ciated with, the electronic record so as to render the 

4 record tamper-resistant. 

5 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. 

6 In this Act: 

7 (1) ELECTRONIC RECORD.—The term ‘‘elec8 tronic record’’ has the meaning given that term in 

9 section 106 of the Electronic Signatures in Global 

10 and National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7006). 

11 (2) LOGICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH.—Seal infor12 mation is ‘‘logically associated with’’ an electronic 

13 record if the seal information is securely bound to 

14 the electronic record in such a manner as to make 

15 it impracticable to falsify or alter, without detection, 

16 either the record or the seal information. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00161- CR NO. 03-05-00162- CR NO. 03-05-00163- CR Ro be r t A nt honyWe dm e r , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URTS OF BELL CO UNTY, 27TH & 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS NOS . 56346 , 56650 & 5665 1, HO NORAB LE RICK M ORRI S, JUDGE PRESI DING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Robert Anthony

Wedmer see ks to appea l from judg ments of conviction for violating a pr ote c tiv e or de r. Th e tr ia l c ourt ha s c e rt if ie d, and the re c or d c on fi rm s, that th e se are ple a ba rg a in case s and Wedmer ha s no rig ht of appe al. SeeTex. R. A p p . P. 25.2(a)( 2). The a ppeals a re dismiss ed. Se eid . rule 25.2(d) .

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces B . A. Smith and Pemberton Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: April 19, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
----

|     (1)          | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     (2)     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:       August 14 , 2008 | By:    | /s/       Christopher      Gilcher |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | Christopher      Gilcher                |   |
|                               |   | Chief      Financial Officer            |   |

----
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos 333-130018,
333-114164, 333-105318, 333-105317, 333-101320, 333-100763, 333-43574, 333-57782, 333-79573,
333-79553, 333-56905, 333-39747 and 333-28725) and on Form S-3 (Nos 333-79659, 333-58659,
333-48513, 333-66120, 333-19601 and 333-67546) of Advent Software, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial
statements and management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
San Jose, California
March 31, 2006

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonic Innovations, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen L. Wilson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sonic Innovations, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                      
|----- |  | ---------------------
|      |  | /s/ STEPHEN L. WILSON
|Name: |  | Stephen L. Wilson    
|Date: |  | August 9, 2004       



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Sonic Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by Sonic Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### *W. L. Wallace and Wife*vs. *John Gill et al.*

In oases of partition, the costs are usually to be paid out of the property, or by the parties, according to their interests.

Plaintiff being entitled to one-seventh of two-thirds of a tract of land, filed his bill for partition thereof: on the return of the Commissioners, the whole estate was ordered to be vested in one of the defendants, and “the costs to be paid out of the estate.” *Held,*that plaintiff was liable for only one-seventh of two-thirds of the costs.

The bill in this case was filed for partition of a tract of land. The intestate left a widow, entitled to one-third of the land, and seven children, (of whom plaintiff's wife was one, and John Gill, the defendant, another,) each entitled to one-seventh of two-thirds. A writ of partition was issued ; and the Commissioners recommended that the whole estate be vested in John Gill, on his paying, <fcc. The return was confirmed, and the “ costs ordered to be paid out of the estate.”

The Commissioner taxed the costs, and required the plaintiff to pay only one-seventh of two-thirds thereof. The defendant, John Gill, insisted that plaintiff was bound to pay one-half; and at York, June sittings, 1831, made the question before Johnston, Ch., who confirmed the Commissioner’s taxation. The defendant appealed. .

*Williams,*for appellant.

*Mills,*contra.

*142The opinion of thé Court was delivered by

O’Neall, J.

In cases of partition, the costs are usually to be paid out of the property to be partitioned, or by the parties according to their interests.

In the case before us, the whole property has been assigned to the defendant, and the complainant is entitled to receive only one-seventh of two-thirds of the assessed value. His share of the costs must be in the ratio of his. interest. It was said, in the argument, that' the defendant, before the bill was filed, purchased the interests of the other distributees. If this be so, he is liable to the whole of the costs except the complainant’s share: if it be not, he will be entitled to deduct, from each dis-tributee’s share of the assessed value of the land, his or her share of the costs, before he pays over the amount to him or her. This will be, as to himself and his co:defendants, paying the costs out of the land according to their interests.

It is ordered and decreed, that Chancellor Johnston’s decree be confirmed. .

JOHNSON and Martin, JJ., concurred.

*Appeal dismissed.*
OKLAHOMA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (OKARNG) DRINKING 

WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Camp Gruber, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army National 

Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act 

(SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the American 

public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to ensure the 

EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: August 2020

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory's ability to detect

Future Testing Event: August 2023

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Oklahoma National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 405-228-5037

Office E-mail Address: ng.ok.okarng.list.staff-pao@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION

I, Brenda G. Gujral, President, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

> - designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
- evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
- disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> - all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
- any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation      General Partner
 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                               

Name: Brenda G. GujralTitle: President of the General Partner and          principal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P

Date: November 12, 2003
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10741

Summary Calendar

__________________

DONNA JEAN SCOTT BOZEMAN,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DON EDGEWORTH, Physician,

 Defendant-Appellee,

and

JERRY WOOD,

 Defendant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CV-410-A

- - - - - - - - - -

March 20, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donna Jean Scott Bozeman appeals the district court's grant

of summary judgment in favor of Don Edgeworth. Bozeman filed a

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that

Edgeworth denied her essential medical treatment while she was

incarcerated as a pretrial detainee at the Tarrant County Jail.
No. 95-10741

-2-

We have reviewed the record and Bozeman's brief and perceive

no reversible error. Accordingly, the decision of the district

court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

                              STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Darryl Cohen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ocean
West Holding Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(a)     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A Amendment No. 2 of the Company for
        the quarter ended September 30, 2005, to which this certification
        accompanies (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and


(b)     the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.

Dated: October 10, 2006

                                            /s/ Darryl Cohen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Darryl Cohen,
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                            Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ocean West Holding
Corporation and will be retained by Ocean West Holding Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.