alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Children’s Internet, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sholeh
      Hamedani, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ SHOLEH HAMEDANISholeh Hamedani,Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial OfficerAugust
                20, 2007
**EXHIBIT 32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonic Innovations Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen L. Wilson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sonic Innovations, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | d)     | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                           |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | e)     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc. |

 

|   | /s/ STEPHEN L. WILSON |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|   |                       |   |
| Name:  | **Stephen L. Wilson** |   |
|   |                  |   |
| Date:  | **August 14, 2003**   |   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sonic Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by Sonic Innovations,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40164 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JORGE HERNANDEZ-RAMOS, also known as Jorge Perez-Hernandez Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-1196-ALL
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge Hernandez-Ramos raisesarguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The appellant's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and thejudgment ofthe district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   334,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (334,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.02


</TABLE>
# Longtime partners Illinois National Guard and Poland complete exercise

/ Published Oct. 7, 2014

ORZYSZ, Poland - Soldiers from the Illinois Army National Guard's 33rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team (33rd IBCT) in Urbana, Illinois, and the 244th Digital Liaison Detachment in Chicago, participated in the largest multi-national military training exercise in Polish history, Sept. 24 to Oct. 4.

Anaconda 14 involved nearly 13,000 Soldiers from nine nations throughout the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and was conducted at various sites throughout Poland. The 33rd IBCT participated in the event through a tactical operation center exercise from the Orzysz training area. The brigade worked closely with the 12th Mechanized Division from the Polish Army, as well as brigades from Lithuania and the Czech Republic.

Maj. Gen. Marek Mecherzynski, the commanding officer of the Polish Army's 12th Mechanized Division, said the exercise tested unified operations between the nations involved. 

"The goals of the exercise were achieved on all levels," said Mecherzynski during the closing ceremony of the exercise.

The Illinois National Guard partnered with Poland more than 20 years ago in what is now called the State Partnership Program.

 During the exercise, the 33rd IBCT helped the brigade expand on that partnership. Col. Mark Jackson of Frankfort, Illinois, 33rd IBCT commander, said the Illinois Soldiers learned lessons involving the partnership.

 "We took away some integration experience with other national organizations and countries," Jackson said.

 The exercise also gave the brigade a chance to collaborate with the 2nd Brigade Combat Team (BCT), 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) as two Soldiers from the 101st worked with the 33rd IBCT. 

Jackson believes the first test of this new partnership went very well.

 "I think we got great dividends," Jackson said. "I like the way they just found themselves naturally integrated even though they hadn't worked with us before."

Capt. Corey Wilson, the assistant operations officer for the 2nd BCT, 101st Airborne, worked with Soldiers from the 33rd IBCT. He said it was his first time working with a National Guard brigade and he can see the advantage of the partnership between the two brigades.

 "I think both parties will benefit a lot," Wilson said.

 Wilson said working with the 33rd IBCT increased his knowledge and respect for the National Guard.

 This event marks the end of Jackson's command of the 33rd IBCT. Following the exercise, Jackson relinquished command of the 33rd IBCT to the new commander, Col. Henry S. Dixon of Chicago. "It was bittersweet," Jackson said. "What a great one to go out on."
SERVED: MARCH 30, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF WEBGISTIX CORPORATION DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0208 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013S070031) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List. 

# 7-

, ............- 

### (_ / 

# ------ / . / / Ronnie A. Yodet ./ ChiefAdministrative L Judge",....

_....... 

## _,.,.. Attachment

- Service List ·;·.SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl0001

Webgistix Corporation, Respondent Attn: President 127 EastWarm Springs Rd Las Vegas, NV 89119 Webgistix Corporation, Respondent Attn: President 880 Wigwam Parkway Ste. 120 Henderson, NV 89014 Patrick G. Byrne, Respondent's Counsel Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5958 TEL: 702-784-5201 FAX: 702-784-5252 ONE COPY

Rashawn Rich George, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ASO-7 Federal Aviation Administration, SouthernRegion 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 DocketNo. FAA-2015-0208 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### 2 \ t

# i I , l

# ~ 

# I l 

### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

2
SOUTH CAROLINA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (SCARNG) DRINKING 

WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

McCrady Training Site does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army 

National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water 

Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the 

American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to 

ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Dates: March 2021

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect

Future Testing Event: August 2023

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: South Carolina National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 803-299-5304

Office Contact Form:i https://www.scguard.ng.mil/Contact-Us/

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location

i Submit a contact form through https://www.scguard.ng.mil/Contact-Us/ to send an email to the South Carolina National 

Guard State Public Affairs Office
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. HECTOR TRINIDAD, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 237 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 17th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1126 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 29)11-1-15 1 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 2

Printed 4/18/20089:58:22 AM

Sheet 29of 1823 . 2 

# /9-^naxj^jr-/^ / ,federa l cRegiste r/. ;

y,iA:^^ioJl^!.f

Mqnday,SJulyi;29!,i-1985 - /•iNotices ^ £30791 ^

'ma y mak

e their' ^ 

### •• • :'i '&\i.iaia&^iskj^ ^eai*v i '•va^I?. i-ni-iffiPMjnj^nfl-m-ttgF n an d atrPMfi

d i-vK&ptyWltFfiP' V - s^fdi8ajMf4ifo'.n ^ pwaaea ; 

# *_ . ...mmmim}..

___ ^ ^te^g^^^^w^nayellieirjisgdriima i 

## #Ifcndt ^ L#£,(CCQ ?

inolexoeiedtiien i



### _ _i-;on*»,ey^.th£e£y^ ^ go , 3«^fe ^'-^•^'-qroiHaHiirauuiui'Ui.icuusir e

afeyaiheasuramien v 'a^/%athe-criteria

. diroug h •,prpgrama<)

f th e Agenc y and th e States ^ r ^ , . „„ ^ V a^Th e AgencyJ s considerin g development s T ^ : > ;,an d .approva

l of method s fo ra%f&JJy -a.; , ba>ii^iJH0^ye^1a

t^'j^b^^^A^^onc d eyeiy we e Y?^ f P.W^Y^^;/' a •'measurementsu^ ^ •SF' . ran once-ey e -'^J i - S --.aa^i,- i \- f aa—^•?•^••^fa-^iaar'.La -'£*• :

. : .Impact s ;;: l;metals' c /becaus e _____._

___,._.._____

___._. . .. . i _ . „_.__ __ T ^.__

j __.__„., > _ ; _._ - , i _. Vft _-,_„ T . J . , ;....„..,.......,......,.,.,...... . ........... . • -'/c a r oxidatibi i 'states ; an d p ] .thes e ciiteriii' ; applying'the-iiite^ ^P. 3 

# m.. .^'.'SfflTSliif

V •Federal• • Registe r / . Vol . /50 , No ; 145- /

M6hday;i'JufyV2ffi^^ ^

s develope d< ' basis . However.at : thi8:time » n o '-EPAw , •J mbr-a-tha

n onti afev&iy'. ! *'-%^er^e.^thMourfday' ; a 

## m&A'
se' : ri%-mor e ^deht i ?..l:.^<'-.'Novenlb(8fa2SlBfeli» 1 i e ffl ; ;:i^a^ffie*Bsult<6f:coii 

## M^tif r ia*'--* " La,

iou8i : 3efitiied.®'Gent

i i-SSa a

ll^^aiTheirUses^ ^ $!'**',;' . P oSsl ^ ^Vv-;^'specie s i s very sensitive,-saltwater'- 5 ''-"''v'>'''''models^d r unstressed'w d8^8^;^' ^ iunles s M ^poHah t 8pei;iesJ8 : ^p^; ^ .„ , sensitive.' ' However; * aconcentratio ntliat ; ! !'i* . woul dbeverel y harm5 0 percerit'o f the '

^ u^.^Mk-MA-tftflttll
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS GU I L L ERM O C ARDENA S, Ap pe lla nt,
v. TH E ST AT E O F TE XA S, Appellee
. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 08 -0 02 06 -C R

Appea l from the County Court at L aw No. F our of El Paso County , Texas (TC#20070C05666)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Th is i s an ap pe a l fr om a

jur y c onvic tio n f

or the of fe ns e of a ssa ult c a us e s b od ily

inj ur y fa mil y violence. T EX .P EN A L C ODE ANN . § 2 2
. 01(a) (1)( Ver non Supp. 2008). The cour t assessed
c on fi ne me nt f

or 15 0 d ay s. We a ff

ir m. Appellant’ s court-a

ppointed counsel ha s filed a br ief in which she has conc luded that the appea l is wh o l l y fr i volous and without merit. The brief meets the re quirements of Anders v. Cal ifo rn ia , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.C t. 1396, 18 L .Ed.2d 493, reh. denie d , 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.C t. 2094, 1 8 L
. E d
. 2 d

1 3 7 7 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , b y p r e s e n t i n g a p r o f e s s i o n a l e v a l u a t i o n o f

th e r e c o r d

d e m o n s tr a t i n g w h y, in eff ec t , t h ere are no arguable g rounds to be adva nced. Se e Hi

gh v . S tate , 573 S.W .2d 807 (T e x.Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 51 6 S.W. 2d 68 4 (T e x.Cr im. Ap p. 19 74 ); J ac k so n v . S tate , 48 5 S. W.2 d 5 53 (T e x.Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counse l’s brief a

nd the appellate re cord ha ve bee n delivere d to Appellant, and Appellant has be en advise d of his rig ht to file a pro se brief. N o pro se br ief ha s been f iled. We h ave c are fu lly

re vie we d th e re c or d a

nd c ouns e l’ s b ri e f a

nd a g re e that th e a

pp e a l is wh oll yfrivolous and without merit. Fur ther, we find nothing in the record that might arg uably support the
a pp e a l. The judg ment is affirme d.

GUADA LUPE RI VERA, J ustice J une 3, 2009 B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ. (Do Not Publish)
ARIZONA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (AZARNG) DRINKING WATER 

PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Camp Navajo (CN), does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army 

National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water 

Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the 

American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to 

ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: March 2020

PFOA + PFOS Results: 28.3 ppt

Future Testing Event: March 2022

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Arizona National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 602-267-2555

Office E-mail Address: ng.az.azarng.mbx.azng-pao@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is required for this location.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. NJ15-12-000]

Take notice that on April 6, 2015, Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC submitted its tariff filing per 35.28(e): Oncor Tex-La Tariff Rate Changes, Effective March 20, 2015.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2015.

Dated: April 9, 2015.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-08710 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

|   | **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER** |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|

 

I, Charles McGuirk, Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Companies, Inc. (the (Registrant(), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the (Report() fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

| Date:  November 13, 2006 | By:*/s/ Charles McGuirk* |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|

Charles McGuirk

Chief Financial Officer