alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Principal  Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge,  (i) the Form 10-QSB of
Weststar  Financial  Services  Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended
June 30,  2005  (the  "Report"),  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods  presented
therein.

                                         WESTSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Date: November 9, 2005               By: /s/   G. Gordon Greenwood
                                         ---------------------------------------

                                         G. Gordon Greenwood
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


                                                                              24
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      32,441,000
<SECURITIES>                                24,330,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,201,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            86,146,000
<PP&E>                                      43,267,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,838,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             122,351,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,033,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               122,351,000
<SALES>                                    164,483,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           164,483,000
<CGS>                                       70,439,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               70,439,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,550,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,058,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,492,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,492,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3601 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3601

 To amend the Credit CARD Act of 2009 to provide an earlier effective 
                     date, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2009

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Credit CARD Act of 2009 to provide an earlier effective 
                     date, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Credit CARD Act Effective Date 
Change Act''.

SEC. 2. CHANGE IN EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 3 of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and 
Disclosure Act of 2009 (15 U.S.C. 1602 nt.) is amended by striking 
``become effective 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act,'' 
and inserting ``take effect on the date of the enactment of the Credit 
CARD Act Effective Date Change Act,''.
                                 <all>
```
Memo

To:      Applebee's International, Inc. Executive Officers
         Members of the Board of Directors

From:    Robert T. Steinkamp

Date:    October 20, 2003

Re:      Notice of Blackout Period

As a director  or  executive  officer  of the  Company,  you are  subject to the
restrictions  under  Section  306(a) of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  which
prohibits certain trades during pension plan "blackout" periods. Please note the
following:

1.       The  prohibition  is imposed  because  participants  in the  Applebee's
         International,  Inc.  Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") will be
         temporarily  unable to process  Plan related  transactions  or obtain a
         distribution  from the Plan due to certain service  enhancements to the
         Plan.

2.       You  are not  permitted  to  purchase,  sell or  otherwise  acquire  or
         transfer any equity securities of the Company (or derivative securities
         of those equity securities) during the Blackout Period described below.
         In addition, all transactions still remain subject to the provisions of
         our insider trading policy.

3.       The  prohibition  on sales and  other  transfers  described  in 2 above
         applies only to equity  securities of the Company (and  derivatives  of
         such securities) that you have acquired in connection with your service
         or employment as a director or executive officer of the Company.  It is
         important to note that any such security you sell or otherwise transfer
         will be  automatically  treated as  acquired  in  connection  with your
         service or employment  unless you establish  that the  securities  were
         acquired from another source and this identification is consistent with
         your  treatment  of the  securities  for tax  purposes  and  all  other
         disclosure and reporting requirements.

4.       The Blackout Period will commence on close of business Friday, December
         12, 2003 and end on close of business Friday, December 19, 2003.

If  you  have  any  questions  regarding  this  notice,  please  contact  me  at
913-967-4038 or 4551 W. 107th Street, Overland Park, Kansas 66207.
EVAPORATION & 

CRYSTALLIZATION 
The Process 
Thank you! 

Brian	Kalt	

President	

Fairmont	Brine	Processing	

(412)	680-6244	

Bkalt@FairmontBrine.com

www.FairmontBrineProcesing.com
**EXHIBIT 10.1 SONIC INNOVATIONS, INC. AMENDMENT TO 2000  EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN**

**Amendment to Offering Period for ESPP**

          2(k)          “Offering Periods” shall mean the periods of approximately twenty-four (24) months duringwhich an option granted pursuant to the Plan may be exercised, commenting on the first Trading Day on or after May 1st and November 1st of each year and terminating on the last Trading Day in the periods ending twenty-four months later;provided, however, that on the first Offering Period commencing after May 1, 2003 shall commence on the first Trading Day on or after December 1, 2003 and end on the last Trading Day on or before November 30, 2005; and provided, further, that eachOffering Period thereafter shall commence on the first Trading Day on or after June 1st and December 1st each year, or on such other date as the Board shall determine.  The duration and timing of Offering Periods may bechanged pursuant to Section 4 of this Plan.

          4.              OfferingPeriod.  The Plan shall be implemented by consecutive, overlapping Offering Periods with a new Offering Period commencing on the first Trading Day on or after May 1st and November 1st each year; provided, however, that thefirst Offering Period commencing after May 1, 2003 shall commence on the first Trading Day on or after December 1, 2003 and end on the last Trading Day on or before November 30, 2005; and provided further, that each Offering Period thereafter shallcommence on the first Trading Day on or after June 1st and December 1st each year, or on such other date as the Board shall determine.  The Board shall have the power to change the duration of Offering Periods (includingthe commencement dates thereof) with respect to future offerings without shareholder approval if such change is announced at least five (5) days prior to the scheduled beginning of the first Offering Period to be affected thereafter.
# NC Soldier part of National Guard's championship cyber team

/ Published Dec. 23, 2020

RALEIGH, N.C. – A North Carolina National Guard (NCNG) Soldier earned top national honors at the 5th Annual SANS Institute NetWars DoD Services Cup Championship, a virtual cyber problem-solving competition held online at various locations Dec. 17-18.

Sgt. Michael Gibbs, a cybersecurity analyst with the North Carolina Army National Guard's 883rd Combat Engineer Company, with five other Army and Air National Guard members beat teams from the U.S. Air Force, Air Force Reserves, Space Force, Navy, Marines, Coast Guard and the Defense Information Systems Agency.

"Cyber is always interesting," said Gibbs.

Gibbs was chosen for the six-member team due to years of experience working at Bank of America, military training and multiple state and federal real-world cyber missions – including incident response, state board of elections, and Republican National Convention duty.

Gibbs is also a member of the NCNG's Cyber Security Response Force, which deploys as needed to support local, state and national agencies.

"Gibbs is a great example of the cyber talent pool that resides in our force," said NCNG Army Lt. Col. Robert Felicio, the NCNG's chief information officer.

The Services Cup is a defense-focused competition testing skills in computer and systems administration, threat hunting, analysis, cryptography, and more. As the teams progressed, the problems became increasingly complex, with real-world attack scenarios from simplistic, brute-force attacks to complex ransomware campaigns.

"Basically, it is a cyber puzzle and you have to figure it out," said Army Col. Teri D. Williams, the commander, 91st Cyber Brigade, who chose Gibbs and the rest of the National Guard Services Cup team.

Due to COVID-19 restrictions and the remote nature of cyber defense, the event was held virtually with teams coordinating online and not at a central location.

The National Guard team took an early lead in the competition the first day. The second day had several lead changes, but the National Guard team pulled ahead and won.

"Gibbs is a big winner. I am super stoked," said Eric R. Gladman, SANS Institute Army national account manager.

It is not just bragging rights; the competition honed skills needed to meet current and future cyber challenges that Guard professionals face every day.

"People are amazed we can do this in the Guard," said Gibbs.
### Adams , Kevi n (OST) From : Mik e Worthingto n [bogeybro l ©yahoo.com ] Sent : Saturday , Novembe r12 , 201 1 10:2 7 A M To : EA S (OST ) Subject : F t Dodg e airpor

t 

### Fro mth e selection s bein g presente dt o replac e Delt aAirlin e it look s lik e Great

Lake s Airline s i s th e bes t option . Mik e Worthingto n HuniboMt , l A



## 0 -^ ^ *^*v;v.,-
- . • - ^ m S •- , • "tr T i»

_•

### Adams . Kevi n (OST ) From : For t Dodg e - Marl<etin g Coordinato r[1192marl<eting@hy-vee.com ] Sent : Friday , Novembe r11 , 201 1 5:5 1 P M To : EA S (OST ) Subject : For t Dodg e ai rservic e Fort Dodg e i s a n agricultural , industrial , retail , educationa l an d medica l hu b fo rnorthwes t Iowa . Ou rFort Dodg e Regiona l Airpor t serve s a larg e geographica l are a an d mus t continu e t o d o so . I wor k i n th e retai l secto ran d ou rcontinue d growt h wil l rel yo n bein g a communit ytha t offer s a variet yo f stron g fundamenta l resource s includin g efficien t transportatio n fo rcommercia l an d privat e ai rservice . I strongl ysuppor t th e Federa l Essentia l Ai rServic e Program , designe d t o ensur e tha t rura l area s hav e a lin k t o th e nationa l transportatio n system . 

### An n Halbu r Marketin g & Event s Coordinato r Hy-Ve e Foo d Stor e 11 5 S 29'*

^ Stree t Fort Dodge , l A 5050 1 515-573-410 5 phon e 1192marketing@hv-vee.co m 

## Malqn g Live s 'Easier, Heaiifiier &9{appie r

^ -

### Adams , Kevi n (OST) From : bretcharo n [car_doctor54@yahoo.com ] Sent : Tuesday , Novembe r08 , 201 1 9:3 3 P M To : EA S (OST ) Cc : car_doctor54@yahoo.co m Subject : F t Dodg e ai rservic e 

### I amsendin g thi s in respons e t o Delta' s leavin g th e Ft Dodge , laairport . W e fly ou t o f F t Dodg e 2- 3 time s a year , an dhop e that

th e airlin e yo u pic k

t o replac e Delt aha s direc t servic e t o Minneapoli s like before . Als o th e plane s an dflight

time s are important . At

leas t 2 flights aday an da

t leas t on e i n th e morning , alon g with decen t size dplanes . I thin k

on e o f th e airline s wa s onl y goin g t o us e smal l Cessna s i f i' mno t mistaken . I

t ha s bee n s o convenien t

t o fly fro mFt

Dodge , I hop e tha t

doesn' t change . Th e articl e I rea ddidn' t mentio n ho w th e ticket s woul dcompar e with previou s flights, becaus e w e usuall y fly Delt afro mFD t o Phoeni x throug h Miimeapolis . W e use dt o fly ou t

o f Des Moine s becaus e o f

the-pric e fro mFD . I wa s surprise dwhe n Delt awante dt o leav e becaus e whe n w e fly fro mFD , I can' t remember

atim e recentl y th e plan e wasn' t almos t full ! Thank s for

your consideration . Bre t

Charon , Humboldt , la

4 « « *t. -

### Adams , Kevi n (OST) From : 5155709484@VTEXT.CO M Sent : Tuesday , Novembe r08 , 201 1 5:06 P M To : EA S (OST ) Subject : For t Dodg e ai rservice i s

For t Dodg e ai r servic e i s bes t supporte d b yGrea t Lake s an

d thei r propose d 3 flight s a da y



### ir-^'- ^
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.36


 


Maximum Pledge Contract


 


Contract No.:2012JIYINZUIQUANZHIZIDI12140567


 


Pledgor :Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd


 


Pledgee : CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


 


Signing Date : July 4, 2012


 


Pledge Definition :   To ensure multiple loans Party
B (Pledgee) has lent to Hebei Shengrong Kaiyuan Auto Parts Co., Ltd., Party A (Pledgor) is willing to provide the Maximum Pledge
Guarantee hereunder for Party B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB65, 000,000


 


Pledge Term : From July 4, 2012 to December 28, 2013


 


Collateral: The assets Party A pledges to Party B as Collateral
are listed in Maximum Pledge Contract (No. 2012JIYINZUIQUANZHIZIDI12140567-01). The appraised value of the Collateral is RMB 1,734,390,807.05.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,482
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                19,181
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           8,500
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             8,503
<LOANS>                                         45,386
<ALLOWANCE>                                        453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,226
<DEPOSITS>                                      63,990
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,011
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  82,226
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,944
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  476
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   709
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,129
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,009
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,120
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      162
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    364
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         364
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       206
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.08
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   298
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        7
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  453
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               453
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL CLOTHES WASHERS AND RESIDENTIAL DISHWASHERS,

DEHUMIDIFIERS , AND COOKING PRODUCTS

U.S. Department of Energy Room GE-086 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 April 27, 2006 

### Purpose : The Department will present its methodology for conducting the energy conservation standards rulemaking for commercial clothes washers and residential dishwashers, dehumidifiers, and cooking products. The Department also will seek input from stakeholders on its planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources. Agenda 9:00 - 9:05 a.m. 9:05 - 9:30 a.m.
9:30 - 9:45 a.m. 9:45 - 11:15 a.m.
11:15 -11:30 a.m. 11:30 - 12:00 p.m. 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. 1:00 - 2:15 p.m.
2:15 - 2:55 p.m.
2:55 - 3:15 p.m. 3:15 - 3:30 p.m. 3:30 - 4 :00 p.m.


### 4:00 - 4:45 p.m. Welcome Opening Remarks, Introductions, and Agenda Review Introduction and Analytical Methodology Market and Technology Assessment, Screening Analysis, and Engineering Analysis Break Market and Technology Assessment, Screening Analysis, and Engineering Analysis (continued) Break for Lunch Energy and Water Use, Markups for Equipment Price Determination, and Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis Shipments Analysis, National Impact Analysis, and LCC Subgroup Analysis Manufacturer Impact Analysis Break Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis , Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis Other Issues and Comments / Closing Remarks 

### 4:45 p.m. Adjourn
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-10-00309- CR
Julian Cano Jr., Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F CALDWELL CO UNTY, 421 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 200 9-2 58, H ONO RAB LE TO DD A. B LOM ERTH, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A ND U M O PI N I O N Appellant J ulian Cano, J r., has filed a pro s e notice of appea l from his conviction for the offe nse of driving while intox icated. The district court has cer tified that this is a plea- barg ain
case , the defe ndant has no right of appea l, and the defe ndant has waived the right of appea l. See Tex. R. App. P . 25.2(a) (2), ( d). Ac cording ly , we dismiss the appea l.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Waldrop Dismissed Filed: Jul y

9, 2010 Do Not Publish
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0297-08

JOHNNY RAY OCON, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

ECTOR COUNTY

JOHNSON, J., filed a concurring opinion.

C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

I concur in the judgment ofthe Court. Article 36.22 of the Code of Criminal Procedure states

that “[n]o person shall be permitted to converse with a juror about the case on trial except in the

presence and by the permission of the court.” The bone of contention is what “about the case”

means. The half of the conversation that was overheard by defense counsel certainly evidenced the

juror’s frustration with being required to perform one of his duties as a citizen: “They’ve got me on

this damn jury. I don’t know why the hell they picked me.” The juror clearly did not like the subject
2

matter of the case: “I would rather be on a double ax murderer th[a]n this damn case. It’s dirty,

disgusting.” And he could be seen as biased against the defendant: “No, unless we convict the

bastard today, then I’m kind of stuck here.” But I do not believe that the content of that half of the

conversation is properly called conversing “about the case on trial.” 

As the Court’s opinion notes, the primary goal of Article 36.22 is to insulate jurors from

outside influence. Chambliss v. State, 647 S.W.2d 257, 266 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983). Based on the

content of the known half of the conversation at issue and its apparent brevity, we may assume that

“Brenda” had little, if anything, to say “about the case,” which was described to her, by inference,

only as not being a double ax-murder. Nor, realistically, could she have done so. The juror did not

name the defendant, state the offense alleged, name the court in which the case was being tried, or

reveal anything about the testimony presented. These are not the circumstances that the legislature

wanted to prevent. Mere whining about personal inconvenience does not constitute conversing

“about the case.” Because I conclude that there was no violation of Article 36.22, I concur only in

the judgment of the Court.

Filed: June 3, 2009

Publish