alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.93

 

Amendment of Executive Retention and Severance Agreement

 

This Amendment of Executive Retention and Severance Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into effective as of March 6, 2013 between Move, Inc. (the “Company”) and John Robison (“Executive”).  In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the continued employment of Executive by the Company, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.  Section 2.4 of the Executive Retention and Severance Agreement between Executive and the Company dated February 3, 2012 (the “Retention Agreement”) shall be emended to read in its entirety as follows:

 

“2.4                         Stock Award Acceleration. Immediately prior to the effective date of the Change of Control, 100% of all outstanding stock options granted, restricted stock units granted  and/or restricted stock issued to Executive (collectively the “Outstanding Equity”), shall vest. In addition, all Outstanding Equity consisting of stock options shall be exercisable by Executive for a period of ninety (90) days following the end of such transition period (if any) or ninety (90) days following termination if the Company requests no transition period.”

 

2.  Section 3.4 of the Retention Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

 

“3.4                         Stock Award Acceleration. Upon Executive’s termination date, 100% of all Outstanding Equity shall vest. In addition, all Outstanding Equity consisting of stock options shall be exercisable by Executive for a period of ninety (90) days following the end of such transition period (if any) or ninety (90) days following termination if the Company requests no transition period.”

 

3.  The last sentence of Section 5.4 of the retention Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

 

“In the event of a termination of Executive’s employment (1) by the Company as a result of the Disability of Executive or (2) as a result of the death of Executive, Executive (or Executive’s estate) shall be entitled to the benefits of Section 3 and to the benefits of the terms of the applicable incentive plan under which any equity has been granted to Executive to the extent such terms are more favorable to the Executive than those set forth in Section 3.”

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have caused this Amendment to be executed on the day and year first above written.

 

	
MOVE, INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:   
    	
/s/   James S. Caulfield
    	
 
    
	
Its:   
    	
EVP,   General Counsel and Secretary
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   John Robison
    	
 
    
	
John   Robison
.,Martin, IVU~hael (O$J] ~ ... 

From:. 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Wanda Friday <wrfricfay@yahoo.com> 

Friday, July 06, 2012 4:15 AM 

EAS (OST) 

Comment on EAS Service at Kake, Alaska DOT"OST-2008-0217 

I am writing to say that I support Wings of Alaska in their endeavor to return air service to Kake. Air excursions' rate is 

..... way too expensive to travel with & we do not fly fr:om Kake to Juneau as a result. I strongly believe all Kake would 

benefit. from the competitive rate they. offer. Air Ex~i.Jrsions also· only use th~r small planes most of the time, so freight 

usually takes longer than it should (since space is limited&' passenger freight comes down before freight). It is senseless 

to use two little planes when they own & operate a much larger plane! Wings has a Caravan and they use it when it is 

necessary (which is a great advantage, especially around holidays). I notice other people in the community currently 

charter the Caravan occasionally, so obviously other residents appreciate that size plane. I also notice that Tal Air 

charters come into Kake quite often, so that also shows me that other residents would rather fly with other companies 

instead of air excursions. It is my hope that Wings of Alaska will be able to return their air service to Kake. They offered 

reliable, excellent service to Kake in the past & I believe it would be beneficial to our community. 

Sincerely, 

Wanda R. Friday 

Sent from my iPhone 

1 

.·
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

N OTICE

Appellate case name: General Metal Fabricating Corporation, G. M. F. L easing Inc., and

Arnold Curry v . John Stergiou and Main Marine Repair and Industrial

Cleaning Co.

Appellate case number: 01

- 11

- 00460

- CV

Trial court case number: 0000900

Trial court: 133rd District Cou rt of Harris County

The Court requests that John Stergiou and Main Marine Repair and Industrial Cleaning

Co. respond to the “Further Motion for Rehearing En Banc” filed by General Metal Fabricating

Corp., GMF Leasing, Inc., and Arnold Curry. The response is due fifteen days from the date of

this notice

.

Clerk’s signature : /s/ Christopher A. Prine

Date: June 19, 2013
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION  1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SK3  Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30,  2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date  indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his  knowledge:

| (1)    | The report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of the Company. |

| Dated: November 19, 2007 | By: /s/      SAJID KAPADIA                                            |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |        Sajid      Kapadia                         |
|                     |        Chief      Executive and Financial Officer |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-4468

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROQUE ZUNIGA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-96-60)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 3, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roque Zuniga, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Maguire, Assistant United

States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 We note that Rule 58(g) does not provide for an additional

thirty days within which to note an appeal upon a showing of

excusable neglect. Compare Fed. R. Crim. P. 58(g)(2)(B) with Fed.

R. App. P. 4(b). See United States v. Burgess, 602 F. Supp. 1329,

1331 (E.D. Va. 1985) (holding that Fed. R. App. P. not intended to

govern appeals to district court from magistrate judge's judgments

of conviction).

2 Appellant's motion to expedite is now moot and is dismissed

for that reason.

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

as untimely his appeal from his conviction and sentence imposed by

a magistrate judge. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. An appeal from a

judgment of conviction or sentence by a magistrate judge must be

noted within ten days after entry of the judgment. Fed. R. Crim. P.

58(g)(2)(B). The time periods for filing notices of appeal are

"mandatory and jurisdictional." United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960) (applying Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)).

The magistrate judge entered his order on April 30, 1996;

Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on May 28, 1996. Because

Appellant failed to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of

the appeal period, the district court was without jurisdiction to

consider the merits of Appellant's appeal.1 Accordingly, we deny

Appellant's motion for transcripts at government expense and affirm

the district court's dismissal of Appellant's appeal.2 We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
3

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CA Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


 


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 


 


In connection with the Annual Report for Rainchief Energy Inc. (the
“Company”) on


Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange


Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned,
Brad J. Moynes, President of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:


 


 


(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities


Exchange Act of 1934; and


 


(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the


Financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


 


 


By:


 


 


/s/ Brad J. Moynes


Brad J. Moynes


President


May 3, 2013
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROW BY: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ADRIANA DIAZ, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND JAIME DIAZ, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellants, vs. SURF CITY INVESTORS, LLC, Res ondent. No. 82873



# FILE

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Cause appearing, appellants motion for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED. 1

cc: Hon. Jessica K. Peterson, District Judge Larry J. Cohen, Settlement Judge David J. Winterton & Associates, Ltd. Ghidotti Berger LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

1 Any relief regarding the bond for costs on appeal must be sought in the district court. NRAP 7. 

# 2.-tis 83 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER (01 PM7 ArAt.
04/23/201 0 09:5 8 FAX 202493514 2 FA A • * QM S gOOI/OO l

UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D C 

### I n th e Matte r

of : SU N QUES T EXECUTIV E AI RCHARTER . INC . Docke t No . CP08WP000 4 ':: ' C D FDM S No . FAA-2008-023 8 Served : Apri l 22 , 201 0 EXTENSIO N O F TIM E Th e FA A perfecie dii s appea l b y filin g it s appeal brie f

o n Marc h 16,2010 . Consequently , unde r

1 4 C.F.R . § § 13.233(e) , 13.211(6) , an d13.212 , Responden t Su n Ques t Executiv e Ai r

Charter , Inc. , ("Su n Quest" ) i s require dt o file it s repl y brie f n o later tha n Apri l 26 , 2010 . B y lette r date dApri l 16 , 2010 , Christin aMerric k requeste da30-day extensio n o f tim e fo r th e filing o f

th e repl y brie f

o n behal f o f Sun Quest' s attorney , Arthu r Wasserman . I

n th e letter , Ms . Merric k

explaine dtha t

Mr . Wasserma

n need. s additional tim e i n whic h t o prepar e th e repl y brie f becaus e h e i s i

n th e hospital . Sh e als o represente dthat

sh e hadcontacte dth e FA A attorne y assigne dto thi s matter , an dtha t b e hadn o objectio n t o thi s reques t fo r a n extensio n o f

time . Accordingly , th e reques t

fo r extensio n o f

tim e i n whic h t o file th e repl y brie f i s grante dunde r

1 4 C.F.R . § 13.233(e)(1) . Sunquest' s repl y brie f i s no w du e to b e tile don o r befor e Ma y 26 , 2010 . J . RANDOLP H BABBIT T /^MINISTRATQ R Federal Aviatio n Administratio n VICKIS-LEH^ION ' Manager , Adjudicatio n Branc h

' Issue dunde r authorit y delegate dt o the Chie f Counse l an dth e Assistan t Chie f Counse l fo r Litigatio n b y Memorandu

mdate dOctobe r 27 , 1992 , »nd«

r 4 9 U.S.C . § 322(b ) mi

d1 4 C.F.R . § 13.20 2 {sie 5 7 Fed . Reg . 58,28 0 (1992) ) an dredelegate

db y th e Assistan t Chie f Counse l fo r Litigation t o the Manager, Adjudicatio

n Branch , b

y Memorandu

mdate dAugus t 6 , 1993 . ' i C.' O
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SonusNetworks, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2003 andas amended on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ellen B.Richstone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: June 10, 2005 |   /s/ Ellen B. Richstone                       | * * |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|----------|
|                     | Ellen B. Richstone                                       |
|                     | *Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

1

----
| (1)    | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)    | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August 14, 2017 | By:    | /s/ Kyle Kennedy                                                                                                                                      |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                              |   | KyleKennedy                                                                                                                                                |   |
|                              |   | President,ChiefExecutive Officer and Chairman of the Board(PrincipalExecutive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and acting PrincipalAccounting Officer) |   |
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CTT International Distributors Inc.
      (“CTT”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Amit
      Sankhala, President, Chief Executive Officer of CTT and sole member of the
      Board
      of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of CTT.






*/s/
      Amit Sankhala*


Amit
      Sankhala


Chief
      Executive Officer




November
      14, 2005






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CTT International Distributors Inc.
      (“CTT”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Amit
      Sankhala, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of CTT, certify, pursuant to
      s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of CTT.




*/s/
      Amit Sankhala*


Amit
      Sankhala


Chief
      Financial Officer






November
      14, 2005
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of PhyMatrix Corp. on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-08269, 333-31973, 333-38995 and
333-53317) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-03853, 333-41297 and 333-41177) of our
reports dated March 13, 1998, except for Note 21, for which the date is April 9,
1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of PhyMatrix Corp. as of January 31, 1998 and 1997, and for
the years then ended, and the combined financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 1995, which reports are included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A.


                                          /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Boston, Massachusetts 
May 21, 1998
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 32


                         SHELBOURNE PROPERTIES II, INC.
                             FORM 10-Q JUNE 30, 2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelbourne Properties II Inc., (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.

Date:  August 12, 2003              /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                    -----------------------
                                    Michael L. Ashner
                                    Chief Executive Officer


Date:  August 12, 2003              /s/ Carolyn B. Tiffany
                                    -----------------------
                                    Carolyn B. Tiffany
                                    Chief Financial Officer























                                       34
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER I, Lewis A. Raibley, III, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NYMEX Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants first fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Dated: August 6, 2004 /s/ Lewis A. Raibley, III  Name: Lewis A. Raibley, III
Title: Chief Financial Officer
          (Principal
Financial Officer)