Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices 19961 

1See Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and 

Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 61052 

(October 9, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2For a full description of the scope of the Order, 

see Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Operations, to 

Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of Third 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain 

Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the People’s Republic 

of China,’’ (‘‘I&D Memo’’) dated concurrently with 

these results and hereby adopted by this notice. 

3See Preliminary Results, 79 FR 61053. 

9:00 a.m., Room 3884, in the Herbert C. 

Hoover Building, 14th Street between 

Pennsylvania and Constitution Avenues 

NW., Washington, DC. The Committee 

advises the Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Export Administration 

with respect to technical questions that 

affect the level of export controls 

applicable to materials processing 

equipment and related technology. 

Agenda 

Open Session 

1. Opening remarks and 

introductions. 

2. Presentation of papers and 

comments by the Public. 

3. Discussions on results from last, 

and proposals from last Wassenaar 

meeting. 

4. Report on proposed and recently 

issued changes to the Export 

Administration Regulations. 

5. Other business. 

Closed Session 

6. Discussion of matters determined to 

be exempt from the provisions relating 

to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. 

app. 2 §§ 10 (a) (1) and 10 (a) (3). 

The open session will be accessible 

via teleconference to 20 participants on 

a first come, first serve basis. To join the 

conference, submit inquiries to Ms. 

Yvette Springer at Yvette.Springer@

bis.doc.gov, no later than May 12, 2015. 

A limited number of seats will be 

available for the public session. 

Reservations are not accepted. To the 

extent that time permits, members of the 

public may present oral statements to 

the Committee. The public may submit 

written statements at any time before or 

after the meeting. However, to facilitate 

the distribution of public presentation 

materials to the Committee members, 

the Committee suggests that presenters 

forward the public presentation 

materials prior to the meeting to Ms. 

Springer via email. 

The Assistant Secretary for 

Administration, with the concurrence of 

the delegate of the General Counsel, 

formally determined on February 20, 

2015, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 

amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 § 10(d)), that 

the portion of the meeting dealing with 

matters the premature disclosure of 

which would be likely to frustrate 

significantly implementation of a 

proposed agency action as described in 

5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt 

from the provisions relating to public 

meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 

§§ 10(a) (1) and 10(a) (3). The remaining 

portions of the meeting will be open to 

the public. 

For more information, call Yvette 

Springer at (202) 482–2813. 

Dated: April 8, 2015. 

Yvette Springer, 

Committee Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08580 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–954] 

Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Final Partial Rescission of 

the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the ‘‘Department’’) published the 

Preliminary Results of the third 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

magnesia carbon bricks from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on 

October 9, 2014.1 We gave interested 

parties an opportunity to comment on 

the Preliminary Results. Based upon our 

analysis of the comments received, we 

made no change to the Preliminary 

Results. The final weighted-average 

dumping margins are listed below in the 

‘‘Final Results of Administrative 

Review’’ section of this notice. The 

period of review (‘‘POR’’) is September 

1, 2012, through August 31, 2013. 

DATES: Effective date: April 14, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry 

Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4047. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 9, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results. On 

November 10, 2014, the Department 

received a case brief from Resco 

Products, Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’) and 

Magnesita Refractories Company, a 

domestic interested party. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

includes certain magnesia carbon bricks. 

Certain magnesia carbon bricks that are 

the subject of this order are currently 

classifiable under subheadings 

6902.10.1000, 6902.10.5000, 

6815.91.0000, 6815.99.2000 and 

6815.99.4000 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

is dispositive.2

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case brief by parties in this review in the 

Decision Memo. A list of issues 

included in the Decision Memo is 

attached as Appendix I to this notice. 

The Decision Memo is a public 

document and it is available 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov, and it is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Room 7046 of 

the main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, the Decision 

Memo can be accessed directly on 

Enforcement and Compliance’s Web site 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/

index.html. The signed Decision Memo 

and the electronic version of the 

Decision Memo are identical in content. 

Final Partial Rescission of the 

Administrative Review 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department indicated its intention to 

rescind this review with respect to 

Fedmet Resources Corporation 

(‘‘Fedmet’’), based on Fedmet’s 

statement and supplemental 

information that it is a U.S. importer, 

not a PRC producer.3 Subsequent to the 

Preliminary Results, no information was 

submitted on the record contrary to 

Fedmet’s claim, and no party provided 

written arguments regarding this issue. 

Thus, we are rescinding this review 

with respect to Fedmet, and Fedmet’s 

entries will be subject to the appropriate 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
19962 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices 

4 Id. 

5Fengchi’s no shipments certification also 

applied to Fengchi Refractories Co., of Haicheng 

City; however, that company did not previously 

qualify for a separate rate and remains subject to the 

cash deposit requirements for the PRC-Wide Entity 

as discussed below. See letter to the Department 

from Fengchi, ‘‘Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China 

Case No. A–570–954: No Shipments Letter,’’ dated 

January 2, 2014. 

6See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (‘‘Assessment Practice 

Refinement’’); see also the ‘‘Assessment’’ section of 

this notice, below. 

7See Preliminary Results, and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4. 

8See, e.g., Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 74 FR 8907, 8910 

(February 27, 2009). 

9See Preliminary Results, and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4. 

10For a list of companies that are subject to this 

administrative review as part of the PRC-Wide 

Entity, see Appendix II to this notice. 

11See Preliminary Results, 79 FR 61503. 

12See, e.g., Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 

47363, 47365 (August 8, 2012), unchanged in 

Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010- 

2011, 78 FR 10130 (February 13, 2013). A change 

in practice with respect to the conditional review 

of the PRC-wide entity is not applicable to this 

administrative review. See Antidumping 

Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 

Department Practice for Respondent Selection in 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional 

Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65964, 

65969–70 (November 4, 2013). 

13For a list of companies that are subject to this 

administrative review as part of the PRC-Wide 

Entity, see Appendix II to this notice. 

exporter’s cash deposit requirements 

and assessment rates, as outlined below. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

As noted in the Preliminary Results, 

Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. of 

Haicheng City (‘‘Fengchi’’) submitted a 

timely-filed certification that it had no 

shipments of subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POR. Thus, we 

preliminarily determined that Fengchi 

had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR.4 We 

received no contradictory information 

from CBP indicating that there were 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise into the United States 

exported by Fengchi. Accordingly, for 

the final results we continue to find that 

Fengchi had no shipments of subject 

merchandise, and it will retain its 

separate-rate status which was in effect 

at the initiation of this administrative 

review.5 Consistent with our assessment 

clarification, the Department will issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based 

on our final results.6

PRC-Wide Entity 

In the Preliminary Results, for the 

PRC-Wide Entity, the Department 

assigned the rate of 236 percent, the 

only rate ever determined for the PRCWide Entity in this proceeding.7

Because this rate is the same as the rate 

for the PRC-Wide Entity from previous 

completed segments in this proceeding 

and nothing on the record of the instant 

review calls into question the reliability 

of this rate, we find it appropriate to 

continue to apply a rate of 236 percent 

to the PRC-Wide Entity.8

Further, in the Preliminary Results, 

the Department determined that those 

companies which did not demonstrate 

eligibility for a separate rate are 

properly considered part of the PRCWide Entity.9 Since the Preliminary 

Results, none of these companies 

submitted comments regarding these 

findings. Therefore, we continue to treat 

these companies as part of the PRCWide Entity.10

Additionally, in the Preliminary 

Results, for 155 companies, the 

Department found that, while the 

request for review had been withdrawn, 

none of these companies was eligible for 

a separate rate at the time of the 

initiation of this review. Accordingly, 

these 155 companies will continue to be 

considered part of the PRC-Wide Entity, 

which remained under review for the 

Preliminary Results.11 Thus, the 

Department did not rescind the review 

for any of these 155 companies in the 

Preliminary Results.12 Since the 

Preliminary Results, no party has 

presented information to the contrary, 

and, thus, these 155 companies 

continue to be considered as part of the 

PRC-Wide Entity, which remains under 

review for the final results.13

Final Results of Review 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period September 1, 2012, through 

August 31, 2013: 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

PRC-Wide Entity ........... 236.00 

Assessment 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212. The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of 

review. For all appropriate entries 

exported by the PRC-Wide Entity, the 

Department will instruct CBP to 

liquidate these entries at an 

antidumping assessment rate of 236.00 

percent. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

review for shipments of the subject 

merchandise from the PRC entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of these final results, as provided 

by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

For previously investigated or reviewed 

PRC and non-PRC exporters that are 

eligible for a separate rate from a prior 

completed segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for 

all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be eligible for a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate for the PRCWide Entity; and (3) for all non-PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

are not eligible for a separate rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporter that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notifications 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during the POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Department’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as 

a reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO, 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

These final results are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices 19963 

Dated: April 7, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

(1) Whether the Department Should Limit 

CBP Data Query to Suspended AD/CVD 

Entries 

(2) Whether the Department Should Issue 

Q&V Questionnaires to All Companies 

Under Review 

(3) Whether Identifying Misclassified 

Entries Falls Under the Department’s 

Authority 

V. Conclusion 

Appendix II 

Companies Subject to the Administrative 

Review that Are Part of the PRC-Wide Entity 

1. ANH (Xinyi) Refractories Co. Ltd. 

2. Anyang Rongzhu Silicon Industry Co., Ltd. 

3. Barsan Global Lojistik Ve Gum. Mus. 

4. Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd. 

5. Beijing Tianxing Ceramic Fiber Composite 

Materials Corp. 

6. Benxi Iron & Steel (Group) International 

Economic & Trading Co. 

7. Changxing Magnesium Furnace Charge 

Co., Ltd. 

8. Changxing Wangfa Architectural & 

Metallurgical Materials Co., Ltd. 

9. Changzing Zhicheng Refractory Material 

Factory. 

10. China Metallurgical Raw Material Beijing 

Company. 

11. China Quantai Metallurgical (Beijing) 

Engineering & Science Co., Ltd. 

12. Chosun Refractories. 

13. Cimm Group of China. 

14. CNBM International Corporation. 

15. Dalian Cerax Co., Ltd. 

16. Dalian Dalmond Trading Co., Ltd. 

17. Dalian F.T.Z. Huaxin International. 

18. Dalian F.T.Z. Maylong Resources Co., 

Ltd. 

19. Dalian Huayu Refractories International 

Co., Ltd. 

20. Dalian LST Metallurgy Co., Ltd. 

21. Dalian Masoo International Trading. 

22. Dalian Mayerton Refractories Ltd. 

23. Dalian Morgan Refractories Ltd. 

24. Dashiqiao Bozhong Mineral Products Co., 

Ltd. 

25. Dashiqiao City Magnesite. 

26. Dashiqiao City Guangcheng Refractory 

Co., Ltd. 

27. Dashiqiao Jia Sheng Mining Co., Ltd. 

28. Dashiqiao Jinlong Refractories Co., Ltd. 

29. Dashiqiao RongXing Refractory Material 

Co., Ltd. 

30. Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Material 

Co., Ltd. 

31. Dashiqiao Yutong Packing Factory. 

32. Dashiqiao Zhongjian Magnesia. 

33. Dengfeng Desheng Refractory Co., Ltd. 

34. DFL Minmet Refractories Corp. 

35. Duferco SA. 

36. Duferco BarInvest SA Beijing Office. 

37. Duferco Ironet Shanghai Representative 

Office. 

38. Eastern Industries & Trading Co., Ltd. 

39. Far Horizon Trading Limited. 

40. Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd of Haicheng 

City. 

41. Fengchi Refractories Co., of Haicheng 

City. 

42. Fengchi Refractories Corp. 

43. Ferro Alliages & Mineraux Inc. 

44. Firma. 

45. Haicheng City Qunli Mining Co., Ltd. 

46. Haicheng City Xiyang Import & Export 

Corporation. 

47. Haicheng Donghe Taidi Refractory Co., 

Ltd. 

48. Haicheng Ruitong Mining Co., Ltd. 

49. Haiyuan Talc Powder Manufacture 

Factory. 

50. Henan Boma Co. Ltd. 

51. Henan Kingway Chemicals Co., Ltd. 

52. Henan Tagore Refractories Co., Ltd. 

53. Henan Xinmi Changzxing Refractories, 

Co., Ltd. 

54. Hebei Qinghe Refractory Group Co. Ltd. 

55. Huailin Refractories (Dashiqiao) Pte. Ltd. 

56. Hualude Hardware Products Co. Ltd. 

57. Indian Technomac Co., Ltd. 

58. Jfe Refractories Corporation. 

59. Jiangsu Sujia Group New Materials Co., 

Ltd. 

60. Jiangsu Sujia Joint-Stock Co., Ltd. 

61. Jinan Forever Imp. & Emp. Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

62. Jinan Linquan Imp. & Emp. Co. Ltd. 

63. Jinan Ludong Refractory Co., Ltd. 

64. Kosmokraft Refractory Limited. 

65. Kuehne & Nagel Ltd. Dalian Branch 

Office. 

66. Kumas Sanayi Urunleri Ve Insaat Paz. 

67. Lechang City Guangdong Province 

SongXin Refractories Co., Ltd. 

68. Liaoning Fucheng Refractories Group Co., 

Ltd. 

69. Liaoning Fucheng Special Refractory Co., 

Ltd. 

70. Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Minerals Ltd. 

71. Liaoning Jinding Magnesite Group. 

72. Liaoning Mayerton Refractories Co., Ltd. 

73. Liaoning Mineral & Metallurgy Group 

Co., Ltd. 

74. Liaoning Qunyi Group Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

75. Liaoning Qunyi Trade Co., Ltd. 

76. Liaoning RHI Jinding Magnesis Co., Ltd. 

77. Liaoning Zhongxing Mining Industry 

Group Co., Ltd. 

78. LiShuang Refractory Industrial Co., Ltd. 

79. Lithomelt Co., Ltd. 

80. Lua Viet Bestref Joint Venture Co. 

81. Luheng Refractory Co., Ltd. 

82. Luoyang Refractory Group Co., Ltd. 

83. Mayerton Refractories. 

84. Minsource International Ltd. 

85. Minteq International Inc. 

86. National Minerals Co., Ltd. 

87. Navis Zufall Ueberseespeditions. 

88. North Refractories Co., Ltd. 

89. Orestar Metals & Minerals Co., Ltd. 

90. Oreworld Trade (Tangshan) Co., Ltd. 

91. Puyang Refractories Co., Ltd. 

92. Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd. (HQ). 

93. Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd. 

(Manufacturing). 

94. Qingdao Almatis Trading Co., Ltd. (Sales 

Office). 

95. Qingdao Blueshell Import & Emport Corp. 

96. Qingdao Fujing Group Co., Ltd. 

97. Qingdao Huierde International Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

98. Refratechnik Cement GmbH. 

99. Refratechnik Steel GmbH. 

100. RHI AG. 

101. RHI GLAS GmbH. 

102. RHI Refractories Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. 

103. RHI Refractories (Dalian) Co., Ltd. 

104. RHI Trading Shanghai Branch. 

105. RHI Trading (Dalian) Co., Ltd. 

106. Rongyuan Magnesite Co., Ltd. of 

Dashiqiao City. 

107. Shandong Cambridge International 

Trade Inc. 

108. Shandong Lunai Kiln Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

109. Shandong Refractories Corp. 

110. Shanghai Pudong Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd. 

111. Shanghai Vista Packaging Co., ltd. 

112. Shanxi Dajin International (Group) Co., 

Ltd. 

113. Shanxi Xinrong International Trade Co. 

Ltd. 

114. Shenyang Shenghui Refractory Imp. 

115. Shenyang Yi Xin Sheng Lai Refractory 

Materials Co., Ltd. 

116. Shinagawa Refractories Co., Ltd. 

117. Shinagawa Rongyuan Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

118. Sinosteel Corporation. 

119. SMMC Group Co., Ltd. 

120. Store System Inc. O B Dongning Shunf. 

121. Syndicate Exp. Pvt., Ltd. 

122. Tangshan Success Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. 

123. Tianjin New Century Refractories, Ltd. 

124. Tianjin New World Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. 

125. Tianjin Weiyuan Refractory Co., Ltd. 

126. The Economic Trading Group of 

Haicheng Huoying Corporation Ltd. 

127. Vereeniging Refractories (Pty). 

128. Vesuvius Advanced Ceramics (Suzhou) 

Co. Ltd. 

129. Wonjin Refractories Co., Ltd. 

130. Wuxi Tian Liang Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. 

131. Xiyuan Xingquan Forsterite Co., Ltd. 

132. Yanshi City Guangming High-Tech 

Refractories Products Co., Ltd. 

133. YHS Minerals Co., Ltd. 

134. Yingkou Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd. 

135. Yingkou Bl Mining Co., Ltd. 

136. Yingkou Dalmond Refractories Co., Ltd. 

137. Yingkou Guangyang Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

138. Yingkou Guangyang Refractories Co., 

Ltd. (YGR). 

139. Yingkou Heping Samwha Minerals Co., 

Ltd. 

140. Yingkou Jiahe Refractories Co., Ltd. 

141. Yingkou Jinlong Refractories Group. 

142. Yingkou Kyushu Refractories Co., Ltd. 

143. Yingkou Qinghua Group Imp. & Emp. 

Co., Ltd. 

144. Yingkou Qinghua Refractories Co., Ltd. 

145. Yingkou Sanhua Refractory Materials 

Co., Ltd. 

146. Yingkou Tianrun Refractory Co.,Ltd. 

147. Yingkou Wonjin Refractory Material Co., 

Ltd. 

148. Yingkou Yongji Mag Refractory, Ltd. 

149. Yixing Runlong Trade Co., Ltd. 

150. Yixing Xinwei Leeshing Refractory 

Material Co., Ltd. 

151. Yixing Zhenqiu Charging Ltd. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
19964 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices 

1See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip from the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 72624 (December 8, 

2014) (Preliminary Results). 

2See ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, 

Sheet and Strip from the United Arab Emirates (A– 

520–803); Case Briefof JBF RAK, LLC,’’ dated 

January 14, 2015 and ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate 

(PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United 

ArabEmirates: Petitioners’ Case BriefCite briefs’’ 

dated January 15, 2015. 

3See ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, 

Sheet and Strip from the United Arab Emirates (A– 

520–803); Rebuttal Brief of JBF RAK, LLC,’’ dated 

January 20, 2015. 

4See Memorandum to Mark Hoadley, ‘‘Final 

Analysis Memorandum for JBF RAK LLC,’’ April 7, 

2015. 

5The Department applied the assessment rate 

calculation method adopted in Antidumping 

Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average 

Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 

FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). 

152. Zhejiang Changxing Guangming Special 

Refractory Material Foundry, Co., Ltd. 

153. Zhejiang Deqing Jinlei Refractory Co., 

Ltd. 

154. Zhejiang Huzhou Fuzilin Refractory 

Metals Group Co., Ltd. 

155. Zhengzhou Annec Industrial Co., Ltd. 

156. Zhengzhou Huachen Refractory Co., Ltd. 

157. Zhengzhou Huawei Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

158. Zibo Lianzhu Refractory Materials Co., 

Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08591 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–520–803] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab 

Emirates: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 8, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film (PET 

Film) from the United Arab Emirates.1

This review covers one producer/

exporter of subject merchandise, JBF 

RAK LLC (JBF). Based on our analysis 

of the comments and information 

received, we made changes to the 

Preliminary Results, which are 

discussed below. The final weightedaverage dumping margin is listed below 

in the section titled ‘‘Final Results of 

Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective Date: April 14, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4261. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 8, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results. 

Since the Preliminary Results, the 

following events have taken place: The 

Department received timely case briefs 

from JBF on January 14, 2015, and from 

DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi 

Polyester Film, Inc., and SKC, Inc., 

(collectively, Petitioners) on January 15, 

2015.2 JBF filed a timely rebuttal brief 

on January 20, 2015.3

Period of Review 

The period of review is November 1, 

2012, through October 31, 2013. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or primed 

polyethylene terephthalate film (PET 

Film), whether extruded or co-extruded. 

Excluded are metallized films and other 

finished films that have had at least one 

of their surfaces modified by the 

application of a performance-enhancing 

resinous or inorganic layer more than 

0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is 

roller transport cleaning film which has 

at least one of its surfaces modified by 

application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR 

latex. Tracing and drafting film is also 

excluded. PET Film is classifiable under 

subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, our 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by parties in the case 

and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, from 

Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United 

Arab Emirates: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results’’ 

(Decision Memorandum), dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted 

by, this notice. A list of the issues 

addressed in the Decision Memorandum 

is appended to this notice. The Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is available electronically via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Services System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov, and it is available to 

all parties in the Central Records Unit 

of the main Commerce Building, Room 

7046. In addition, a complete version of 

the Decision Memorandum is also 

accessible on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Decision Memorandum and 

the electronic versions of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we made 

adjustments to our margin calculations 

for JBF. Specifically, we have made 

adjustments for commissions JBF 

received in the home and U.S. markets, 

we have adjusted JBF’s finance expense 

ratio, and we have adjusted the 

materials cost to account for certain 

inputs JBF purchased from an affiliated 

party.4 A complete discussion of these 

adjustments and changes can be found 

in the Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period of November 1, 2012, through 

October 31, 2013: 

Producer or 

exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent ad valorem) 

JBF RAK LLC ....... 11.49 

Disclosure 

We will disclose to interested parties 

the calculations performed in 

connection with these final results 

within five days of the publication of 

this notice, consistent with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review.5 The 

Department intends to issue appropriate 

assessment instructions directly to CBP 

15 days after the date of publication of 

these final results of review. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES