Compliance with rules of the House of Representatives and Senate

regarding earmarks and congressionally directed spending 

items

Summary of discretionary authorizations and budget implication

DIVISION A–Department of Defense Authorizations

TITLE I–PROCUREMENT

Subtitle A–Authorization of Appropriations

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 101)

Subtitle B–Army Programs

Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker 

vehicle program (sec. 111)

Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority 

for tactical vehicles (sec. 112)

Subtitle C–Navy Programs

CVN–78 class aircraft carrier program (sec. 121)

Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of 

future surface combatants (sec. 122)

Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft 

program (sec. 123)

Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral 

Combat Ship (sec. 124)

Subtitle D–Air Force Programs

Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain 

retired KC–135E aircraft (sec. 131)

Multiyear procurement authority for C–130J aircraft 

(sec. 132)

Prohibition on cancellation or modification of 

avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft 

(sec. 133)

Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C–27J 

aircraft by the Air Force (sec. 134)

Subtitle E–Defense-Wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

Personal protection equipment procurement (sec. 141)

Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements (sec. 

142)

Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of 

RQ–4 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems and A10 aircraft (sec. 143)

MC-12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and 

Reconnaissance aircraft (sec. 144)

Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle 

providers (sec. 145)

Reports on personal protection equipment and health 

and safety risks associated with ejection seats 

(sec. 146)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
Modification of requirements to sustain Navy airborne 

intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 

capabilities 

Multiyear procurement authority for Ground-Based 

Interceptors 

Sense of Senate on the United States helicopter 

industrial base

TITLE II–RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Subtitle A–Authorization of Appropriations

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 201)

Subtitle B–Program Requirements, Restrictions, and 

Limitations

Modification of requirements on biennial strategic 

plan for the Defense Advanced Research Projects 

Agency (sec. 211)

Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat 

vehicle engineering and manufacturing phase (sec. 

212)

Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned 

carrier-launched surveillance and strike system 

program (sec. 213)

Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force 

logistics transformation (sec. 214)

Limitation on availability of funds for defensive 

cyberspace operations of the Air Force (sec. 215)

Limitation on availability of funds for precision 

extended range munition program (sec. 216)

Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on 

availability of funds for noncompetitive 

procedures for offensive anti-surface warfare 

weapon contracts of the Navy (sec. 217)

Review of software development for F–35 aircraft (sec. 

218)

Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common 

ground system (sec. 219)

Operationally responsive space (sec. 220)

Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities 

(sec. 221)

Subtitle C–Missile Defense Programs

Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on 

ballistic missile defense system (sec. 231)

Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program (sec. 

232)

Prohibition on availability of funds for integration 

of certain missile defense systems; report on 

regional ballistic missile defense (sec. 233)
Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome 

short-range rocket defense system in the United 

States (sec. 234)

Additional missile defense radar for the protection of 

the United States homeland (sec. 235)

Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile 

defense sensor architectures (sec. 236)

Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense 

system (sec. 237)

Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile 

defense options (sec. 238)

Briefings on status of implementation of certain 

missile defense matters (sec. 239)

Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile 

defense burden-sharing (sec. 240)

Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic 

missile defense capabilities (sec. 241)

Sense of Congress on procurement of capability 

enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle (sec. 

242)

Subtitle D–Reports

Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious 

combat vehicle acquisition program (sec. 251)

Annual Comptroller General of the United States report 

on the acquisition program for the VXX 

Presidential Helicopter (sec. 252)

Report on strategy to improve body armor (sec. 253)

Subtitle E–Other Matters

Establishment of Communications Security Review and 

Advisory Board (sec. 261)

Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds 

for defense laboratories for research and 

development of technologies for military missions 

(sec. 262)

Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced 

technology achievements (sec. 263)

Five-year extension of pilot program to include 

technology protection features during research 

and development of certain defense systems (sec. 

264)

Briefing on biometrics activities of the Department of 

Defense (sec. 265)

Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common 

missile compartment of Ohio-class replacement 

program with the United Kingdom’s Vanguard 

successor program (sec. 266)
Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power 

microwave missile project (sec. 267)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Conventional Prompt Global Strike program

Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing 

requirement

Requirement to complete individual carbine testing

Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for a 

Navy laser weapon system 

Analysis of alternatives for successor to Precision 

Tracking Space System

Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic 

Defense Initiative

Sense of Congress on negotiations affecting the 

missile defenses of the United States

Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency

Report on powered rail system

Report on science, technology, engineering, and 

mathematics scholarship program 

Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate 

in defense experimental program to stimulate 

competitive research

Briefing on power and energy research conducted at 

university-affiliated research centers

Approval of certain new uses of research, development, 

test, and evaluation land

Canines as stand-off detection of explosives and 

explosive precursors

TITLE III–OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Subtitle A–Authorization of Appropriations

Operation and maintenance funding (sec. 301)

Subtitle B-Energy and Environment

Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets 

for activities relating to operational energy 

strategy (sec. 311)

Facilitation of interagency cooperation in 

conservation programs of the Departments of 

Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid or 

reduce adverse impacts on military readiness 

activities (sec. 312)

Reauthorization of Sikes Act (sec. 313)

Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in 

open-air burn pits (sec. 314)

Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of 

drop-in fuels (sec. 315)

Subtitle C-Logistics and Sustainment
Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and 

equipment (sec. 321)

Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and 

report (sec. 322)

Consideration of Army arsenals’ capabilities to 

fulfill manufacturing requirements (sec. 323)

Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, 

and replacement of operating forces used to 

support overseas contingency operations (sec. 

324)

Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan (sec. 

325)

Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit 

visibility (sec. 326)

Subtitle D-Reports

Additional reporting requirements relating to 

personnel and unit readiness (sec. 331)

Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds 

for equipment readiness and strategic capability 

(sec. 332)

Revision to requirement for annual submission of 

information regarding information technology 

capital assets (sec. 333)

Modification of annual corrosion control and 

prevention reporting requirements (sec. 334)

Subtitle E-Limitations and Extensions of Authority

Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air 

Force Base, Azores (sec. 341)

Limitation on performance of Department of Defense 

flight demonstration teams outside the United 

States (sec. 342)

Limitation on funding for United States Special 

Operations Command National Capital Region (sec. 

343)

Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional 

Web Initiative (sec. 344)

Subtitle F-Other Matters

Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units 

(sec. 351)

Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility 

uniforms (sec. 352)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Authorization of appropriations for the Marine Corps 

Embassy Security Group

Authorization of appropriations for Crisis Response 

Force
Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land 

management related to Department of Defense 

readiness activities 

Exclusions from definition of “chemical substance” 

under Toxic Substances Control Act 

Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative 

fuel procurement requirement

Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or 

construction of biofuels refineries

Military readiness and southern sea otter conservation

Assessment of outreach for small business concerns 

owned and controlled by women and minorities 

required before conversion of certain functions 

to contractor performance

Ordnance related records review and reporting 

requirement for Vieques and Culebra Islands, 

Puerto Rico 

Authorization to institute a centralized, automated 

mail redirection system to improve the delivery 

of absentee ballots to military personnel serving 

outside the United States

TITLE IV–MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A–Active Forces

End strengths for active forces (sec. 401)

Revisions in permanent active duty end strength 

minimum levels and in annual limitation on 

certain end strength reductions (sec. 402)

Subtitle B-Reserve Forces

End strengths for Selected Reserve (sec. 411)

End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support 

of the reserves (sec. 412)

End strengths for military technicians (dual status) 

(sec. 413)

Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual 

status technicians (sec. 414)

Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be 

on active duty for operational support (sec. 415)

Subtitle C-Authorization of Appropriations

Military personnel (sec. 421)

TITLE V-MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

Subtitle A-Officer Personnel Policy Generally

Congressional notification requirements related to 

increases in number of general and flag officers 

on Active Duty or in joint duty assignments (sec. 

501)
Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced 

education upon original appointment as a 

commissioned officer (sec. 502)

Selective early retirement authority for regular 

officers and selective early removal of officers 

from reserve active-status list (sec. 503)

Subtitle B-Reserve Component Management

Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve 

components (sec. 511)

Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers 

between the active and inactive National Guard 

(sec. 512)

Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain 

reserve component units and involuntary 

mobilizations of certain Reserves (sec. 513)

Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve 

component general and flag officers in an active 

status (sec. 514)

Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National 

Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth 

of the Northern Mariana Islands (sec. 515)

Subtitle C-General Service Authorities

Provision of information under Transition Assistance 

Program about disability-related employment and 

education protections (sec. 521)

Medical examination requirements regarding posttraumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain 

injury before administrative separation (sec. 

522)

Establishment and use of consistent definition of 

gender-neutral occupational standard for military 

career designators (sec. 523)

Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service 

Implementation Plan (sec. 524)

Provision of military service records to the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs in an electronic format (sec. 

525)

Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System 

(sec. 526)

Subtitle D-Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual 

Assault Prevention and Response and Related Reforms

Modification of eligibility for appointment as judge 

on the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Armed Forces (sec. 531)

Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of 

members of the Armed Forces and chaplains of such 

members (sec. 532)
Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces 

compliance with regulations for the protection of 

rights of conscience of members of the Armed 

Forces and their chaplains (sec. 533)

Survey of military chaplains views on Department of 

Defense policy regarding chaplain prayers outside 

of religious services (sec. 534)

Subtitle E-Member Education and Training

Additional requirements for approval of educational 

programs for purposes of certain educational 

assistance under laws administered by the 

Secretary of Defense (sec. 541)

Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and 

training for military occupational specialties 

with skills and training required for civilian 

certifications and licenses (sec. 542)

Report on the Troops to Teachers program (sec. 543)

Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of 

requiring automatic operation of current 

prohibition on accrual of interest on direct 

student loans of certain members of the Armed 

Forces (sec. 544)

Subtitle F-Defense Dependents’ Education and Military 

Family Readiness Matters

Continuation of authority to assist local educational 

agencies that benefit dependents of members of 

the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees (sec. 551)

Impact aid for children with severe disabilities (sec. 

552)

Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual 

elementary and secondary education component of 

Department of Defense education program (sec. 

553)

Family support programs for immediate family members 

of members of the Armed Forces assigned to 

special operations forces (sec. 554)

Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the 

armed forces in child custody determinations 

(sec. 555)

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards

Repeal of limitation on number of Medals of Honor that 

may be awarded to the same member of the Armed 

Forces (sec. 561)

Standardization of time-limits for recommending and 

awarding Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service 
Cross, Navy Cross, Air Force Cross, and 

Distinguished-Service Medal (sec. 562)

Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, 

and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll requirements 

(sec. 563)

Prompt replacement of military decorations (sec. 564)

Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart 

to victims of the attacks at recruiting station 

in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas 

(sec. 565)

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to 

former members of the Armed Forces previously 

recommended for award of the Medal of Honor (sec. 

566)

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts 

of valor during the Vietnam War (sec. 567)

Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service 

Cross for acts of valor during the Korean and 

Vietnam Wars (sec. 568)

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First 

Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor 

during the Civil War (sec. 569)

Subtitle H—Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports

Report on feasibility of expanding performance 

evaluation reports to include 360-degree 

assessment approach (sec. 571)

Report on Department of Defense personnel policies 

regarding members of the Armed Forces with HIV or 

Hepatitis B (sec. 572)

Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of 

graduates of secondary schools (sec. 573)

Comptroller General report on use of determination of 

personality disorder or adjustment disorder as 

basis to separate members from the Armed Forces 

(sec. 574)

Subtitle I—Other Matters

Accounting for members of the armed forces and 

Department of Defense civilian employees listed 

as missing and related reports (sec. 581)

Expansion of privileged information authorities to 

debriefing reports of certain recovered persons 

who were never placed in a missing status (sec. 

582)

Revision of specified senior military colleges to 

reflect consolidation of North Georgia College 

and State University and Gainesville State 

College (sec. 583)
Review of security of military installations, 

including barracks, temporary lodging facilities, 

and multi-family residences (sec. 584)

Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army 

National Military Cemeteries (sec. 585)

Military salute during recitation of pledge of 

allegiance by members of the Armed Forces not in 

uniform and by veterans (sec. 586)

Improved climate assessments and dissemination of 

results (sec. 587)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Designation of state student cadet corps as Department 

of Defense youth organizations

National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program

Authority for joint professional military education 

phase II instruction and credit to be offered and 

awarded through senior-level course of School of 

Advanced Military Studies of the United States 

Army Command and General Staff College

Authority for Uniformed Services University of the 

Health Sciences to support undergraduate and 

other medical education and training programs for 

military medical personnel

Command responsibility and accountability for remains 

of members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and 

Marine Corps who die outside the United States

Expansion of eligibility for associate degree programs 

under the Community College of the Air Force

Procedures for judicial review of military personnel 

decisions relating to correction of military 

records

Coverage of military occupational specialties relating 

to military information technology under pilot 

program on receipt of civilian credentials for 

skills required for military occupational 

specialties

Report on data and information collected in connection 

with Department of Defense review of laws, 

policies, and regulations restricting service of 

female members of the Armed Forces

Meetings with respect to religious liberty

Proof of period of military service for purposes of 

interest rate limitation under the Servicemembers 

Civil Relief Act

Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel
Department of Defense recognition of spouses of 

members of the Armed Forces who serve in combat 

zones

Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces 

for active duty for purposes of mortgage 

refinancing

Transition of members of the Armed Forces and their 

families from military to civilian life

Mortgage protection for members of the Armed Forces, 

surviving spouses, and certain veterans and other 

improvements to the Servicemembers Civil Relief 

Act

Department of Defense recognition of dependents of 

members of the Armed Forces who serve in combat 

zones 

Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of 

Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps Program

Requirement to continue provision of tuition 

assistance for members of the Armed Forces

Internet access for members of the Army, Navy, Air 

Force, and Marine Corps serving in combat zones

Support for efforts to improve academic achievement 

and transition of military dependent students

Fraudulent representations about receipt of military 

decorations or medals

Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge 

Report on Navy review, findings, and actions 

pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of Marine 

Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta

Required gold content for Medal of Honor 

Consideration of Silver Star Award nominations

Report on Army review, findings, and actions 

pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of 

Captain William L. Albracht

Commission on Military Behavioral Health and 

Disciplinary Issues

Commission on Service to the Nation

Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the 

remains of certain members of the Armed Forces 

killed in Thurston Island, Antarctica

TITLE VI–COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

Subtitle A–Pay and Allowances

Extension of authority to provide temporary increase 

in rates of basic allowance for housing under 

certain circumstances (sec. 601)

Recognition of additional means by which members of 

the National Guard called into Federal service 
for a period of 30 days or less may initially 

report for duty for entitlement to basic pay 

(sec. 602)

Subtitle B–Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay 

authorities for reserve forces (sec. 611)

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay 

authorities for health care professionals (sec. 

612)

One-year extension of special pay and bonus 

authorities for nuclear officers (sec. 613)

One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 

consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and 

bonus authorities (sec. 614)

One-year extension of authorities relating to payment 

of other title 37 bonuses and special pays (sec. 

615)

One-year extension of authority to provide incentive 

pay for members of precommissioning programs 

pursuing foreign language proficiency (sec. 616)

Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and 

midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve 

Officers’ Training Corps (sec. 617)

Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain 

commissioned officers in the reserve components 

(sec. 618)

Subtitle C–Travel and Transportation Allowances

Technical and standardizing amendments to Department 

of Defense travel and transportation authorities 

in connection with reform of such authorities 

(sec. 621)

Subtitle D–Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits

Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion

in the case of members whose retired pay is

computed using high-three (sec. 631)

Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on 

early retirement credit earned for significant 

periods of active Federal status or active duty 

(sec. 632)

Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other 

dependents (sec. 633)

Subtitle E–Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund 

Instrumentality Benefits and Operations

Expansion of protection of employees of 

nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from 

reprisals (sec. 641)
Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund 

instrumentalities for purposes of certain civil 

service laws (sec. 642)

Subtitle F—Other Matters

Authority to provide certain expenses for care and 

disposition of human remains that were retained 

by the Department of Defense for forensic 

pathology investigation (sec. 651)

Study of the merits and feasibility of providing 

transitional compensation and other transitional 

benefits to dependents of members separated for 

violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice 

(sec. 652)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Fiscal year 2014 increase in military basic pay

Correction of citation for extension of reimbursement 

authority for travel expenses for inactive-duty 

training outside of normal commuting distance and 

additional one-year extension

Purchase of sustainable products, local food products, 

and recyclable materials for resale in commissary 

and exchange store systems

Exchange store system participation in the Accord on 

Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh

Effect on division of retired pay of election to 

receive combat-related special compensation after 

previous election to receive concurrent 

retirement and disability compensation

Provision of status under law by honoring certain 

members of the reserve components as veterans

Survey of military pay and benefits preferences

Transportation on military aircraft on a spaceavailable basis for disabled veterans with a 

service-connected, permanent disability rated as 

total

Preservation of retiree dependent status for certain 

dependents upon death or permanent incapacitation 

of the retired member on whom dependent status is 

based

Enhanced role for the Department of Justice under the 

Military Lending Act

Extension of ongoing pilot programs under temporary

Army incentive to provide additional recruitment

incentives

TITLE VII–HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

Subtitle A-TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits
Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain 

beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime (sec. 

701)

Mental health care treatment through telemedicine 

(sec. 702)

Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and 

transition of members of the Armed Forces with 

urotrauma (sec. 703)

Pilot program on investigational treatment of members 

of the Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury 

and post-traumatic stress disorder (sec. 704)

Subtitle B-Health Care Administration

Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health 

Sciences to enter into contracts and agreements 

and make grants to other nonprofit entities (sec. 

711)

Pilot program on increased third-party collection 

reimbursements in military medical treatment 

facilities (sec. 712)

Electronic health records of the Department of Defense 

and the Department of Veterans Affairs (sec. 713)

Subtitle C-Reports and Other Matters

Display of budget information for embedded mental 

health providers of the reserve components (sec. 

721)

Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in 

certain Centers of Excellence (sec. 722)

Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain 

injuries (sec. 723)

Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and 

orthotics to members of the Armed Forces and 

veterans (sec. 724)

Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit 

program and availability of compounded 

pharmaceuticals (sec. 725)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Mental health assessments for members of the Armed 

Forces

Periodic mental health assessments for members of the 

Armed Forces

Behavioral health treatment of developmental 

disabilities under TRICARE

Cooperative health care agreements between the 

military departments and non-military health care 

entities

Limitation on availability of funds for integrated 

electronic health record program
Mental health support for military personnel and 

families

Research regarding hydrocephalus

Traumatic brain injury research

Increased collaboration with NIH to combat triple 

negative breast cancer

Sense of Congress on mental health counselors for 

members of the Armed Forces and their families

Preliminary mental health assessments

Sense of Congress on the traumatic brain injury plan

TITLE VIII–ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND 

RELATED MATTERS

Subtitle A–Acquisition Policy and Management

Enhanced transfer of technology developed at 

Department of Defense laboratories (sec. 801)

Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount 

available for contract services (sec. 802)

Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic 

parts (sec. 803)

Subtitle B-Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, 

Procedures, and Limitations

Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for 

contractor compensation (sec. 811)

Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in 

certain reports (sec. 812)

Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving 

suspension or debarment (sec. 813)

Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military 

purpose nondevelopmental items (sec. 814)

Subtitle C-Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition 

Programs

Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major 

defense acquisition programs (sec. 821)

Assessment of dedicated ground control system before 

Milestone B approval of major defense acquisition 

programs constituting a space program (sec. 822)

Additional responsibility for product support managers 

for major weapon systems (sec. 823)

Comptroller General review of Department of Defense 

processes for the acquisition of weapons systems 

(sec. 824) 

Subtitle D-Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of 

Contingency Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan

Prohibition on contracting with the enemy (sec. 831)

Extension of authority to acquire products and 

services produced in countries along a major 

route of supply to Afghanistan (sec. 832)
Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Modification of reporting requirement for Department 

of Defense business system acquisition programs 

when initial operating capability is not achieved 

within 5 years of Milestone A approval

Restatement and revision of requirements applicable to 

multiyear defense acquisitions to be specifically 

authorized by law 

Report on program manager training and experience 

Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations 

relating to detection and avoidance of 

counterfeit electronic parts

Requirement that cost or price to the Federal 

Government be given at least equal importance as 

technical or other criteria in evaluating 

competitive proposals for defense contracts 

Requirement to buy American flags from domestic 

sources

Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and 

Afghanistan

Report on procurement supply chain vulnerabilities 

Study on the impact of contracting with veteran-owned 

small businesses 

Revisions to requirements relating to justification 

and approval of sole-source defense contracts 

Revision of Defense Supplement to the Federal 

Acquisition Regulation to take into account 

sourcing laws 

Prohibition on purchase of military coins not made in 

the United States 

Compliance with domestic source requirements for 

footwear furnished to enlisted members of the 

Armed Forces upon their initial entry into the 

Armed Forces 

Implementation by Department of Defense of certain 

recommendations of the Comptroller General of the 

United States on oversight of pensions offered by 

Department contractors

Report on the elimination of improper payments

Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act

TITLE IX–DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

Subtitle A–Department of Defense Management

Revisions to composition of transition plan for 

defense business enterprise architecture 

(sec.901)
Comptroller General report on potential relocation of 

Federal Government tenants onto military 

installations in the United States (sec. 902)

Clarification of authority for the command acquisition 

executive of the United States Special Operations 

Command (sec.903)

Streamlining of Department of Defense management 

headquarters (sec. 904)

Update of statutory statement of functions of the 

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to 

doctrine, training, and education (sec. 905)

Modification of reference to major Department of 

Defense headquarters activities instruction (sec. 

906)

Personnel security (sec. 907)

Subtitle B–Space Activities

National security space satellite reporting policy 

(sec. 911)

National security space defense and protection (sec. 

912)

Space acquisition strategy (sec. 913)

Space control mission report (sec. 914)

Responsive launch (sec. 915)

Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection 

Program (sec. 916)

Eagle Vision system (sec. 917)

Subtitle C–Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related 

Activities

Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage 

in commercial activities as security for 

intelligence collection activities (sec. 921)

Department of Defense intelligence priorities (sec. 

922)

Defense Clandestine Service (sec. 923)

Prohibition on National Intelligence Program 

consolidation (sec. 924)

Subtitle D–Cyberspace-Related Matters

Modification of requirement for inventory of 

Department of Defense tactical data link systems 

(sec. 931)

Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United 

States Cyber Command (sec. 932)

Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of 

Defense (sec. 933)

Modification of requirement for Report on Department 

of Defense Progress in Defending the Department 
and the Defense Industrial Base from Cyber Events 

(sec. 934)

Additional requirements relating to the software 

licenses of the Department of Defense (sec. 935)

Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small 

businesses (sec. 936)

Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems 

for the Department of Defense (sec. 937)

Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing 

capabilities (sec. 938)

Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon 

systems and tactical communications systems (sec. 

939)

Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons (sec. 

940)

Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace 

(sec. 941)

National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information 

Assurance Education matters (sec. 942)

Subtitle E-Total Force Management

Reviews of appropriate manpower performance (sec. 951)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the 

Department of the Navy and Marine Corps

Under Secretary of Defense for Management

Report on strategic importance of United States 

military installation of the U.S. Pacific Command

Transfer of administration of Ocean Research Advisory 

Panel from Department of the Navy to National 

Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Navy broad-area maritime surveillance aircraft 

Limitation on availability of funds for collaborative 

cybersecurity activities with China 

Small business cybersecurity solutions office

Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of government

oversight of functions closely associated with

inherently governmental functions

TITLE X–GENERAL PROVISIONS

Budget Item

Funding for New START Treaty preparatory activities

Subtitle A–Financial Matters

General transfer authority (sec. 1001)

Budgetary effects of this Act (sec. 1002)

Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 

financial statements (sec. 1003)
Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear 

Security Administration to sustain nuclear 

weapons modernization (sec. 1004)

Subtitle B–Counter-Drug Activities

Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug 

and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia (sec. 

1011)

Extension of authority for joint task forces to 

provide support to law enforcement agencies 

conducting counter-terrorism activities (sec. 

1012)

Extension and expansion of authority to provide 

additional support for counter-drug activities of 

certain foreign governments (sec. 1013)

Subtitle C–Naval Vessels and Shipyards

Modification of requirements for annual long-range 

plan for the construction of naval vessels (sec. 

1021)

Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship 

donations at no cost to the Navy (sec. 1022)

Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation 

of Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing 

ships (sec. 1023)

Authority for short-term extension or renewal of 

leases for vessels supporting the Transit 

Protection System Escort Program (sec. 1024)

Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight 

III ships (sec. 1025)

Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure 

Assessment (sec. 1026)

Modification of policy relating to major combatant 

vessels of the strike forces of the Navy (sec. 

1027)

Subtitle D–Counterterrorism

Clarification of procedures for use of alternate 

members on military commissions (sec. 1031)

Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism 

Fellowship Program reporting requirement (sec. 

1032)

Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify 

facilities in the United States to house 

detainees transferred from United States Naval 

Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1033)

Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or 

release of individuals detained at United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1034)
Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained 

at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba (sec. 1035)

Report on information relating to individuals detained 

at Parwan, Afghanistan (sec. 1036)

Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in 

military commissions established to try 

individuals detained at Guantanamo (sec. 1037)

Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, 

rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained 

at Guantanamo who are transferred to Yemen (sec. 

1038)

Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained 

at Guantanamo if transferred to the United States 

(sec. 1039)

Subtitle E–Sensitive Military Operations

Congressional notification of sensitive military 

operations (sec. 1041)

Counterterrorism operational briefings (sec. 1042)

Report on process for determining targets of lethal or 

capture operations (sec. 1043)

Subtitle F-Nuclear Forces

Notification required for reduction or consolidation 

of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe (sec. 

1051)

Council on Oversight of the National Leadership 

Command, Control, and Communications System (sec. 

1052)

Modification of responsibilities and reporting 

requirements of Nuclear Weapons Council (sec. 

1053)

Modification of deadline for report on plan for 

nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons 

complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and 

nuclear weapons command and control system(sec. 

1054)

Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad (sec. 

1055)

Implementation of New START Treaty (sec. 1056)

Retention of capability to redeploy multiple 

independently targetable reentry vehicles (sec. 

1057)

Report on New START Treaty (sec. 1058)

Report on implementation of the recommendations of the 

Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose 

Evaluation Report (sec. 1059)
Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms 

reductions with the Russian Federation (sec. 

1060)

Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms 

control treaty obligations (sec. 1061)

Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of 

the nuclear forces of the United States (sec. 

1062)

Subtitle G–Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

Enhancement of capacity of the United States 

Government to analyze captured records (sec. 

1071)

Strategic plan for the management of the 

electromagnetic spectrum (sec. 1072)

Extension of authority to provide military 

transportation services to certain other agencies 

at the Department of Defense reimbursement rate 

(sec. 1073)

Notification of modifications to Army force structure 

(sec. 1074)

Aircraft joint training (sec. 1075)

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports

Online availability of reports submitted to Congress 

(sec. 1081)

Oversight of combat support agencies (sec. 1082)

Inclusion in annual report of description of 

interagency coordination relating to humanitarian 

demining technology (sec. 1083)

Repeal and modification of reporting requirements 

(sec. 1084)

Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General 

assessment of Department of Defense efficiencies 

(sec. 1085)

Review and assessment of United States Special 

Operations Forces and United States Special 

Operations Command (sec. 1086)

Reports on unmanned aircraft systems (sec. 1087)

Report on foreign language support contracts for the 

Department of Defense (sec. 1088)

Civil Air Patrol (sec. 1089)

Subtitle I—Other Matters

Technical and clerical amendments (sec. 1091)

Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major 

automated information system programs (sec. 1092)

Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation 

to issue non-premium aviation insurance (sec. 

1093)
Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and 

authority to waive reimbursement of costs of 

activities for certain nongovernmental personnel 

(sec. 1094)

Amendments to certain national commissions (sec. 1095)

Strategy for future military information operations 

capabilities (sec. 1096)

Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security 

(sec. 1097)

Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire 

suppression and other purposes; tactical airlift 

fleet of the Air Force (sec. 1098)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Department of Defense Readiness Restoration Fund

Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard 

Counter-Narcotic Program

Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards

Authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained 

at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba, to the United States for emergency or 

critical medical treatment

Assessment of affiliates and adherents of Al-Qaeda 

outside the United States

Designation of Department of Defense senior official 

for facilitating the transfer of individuals 

detained at United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 

Summary of information relating to individuals 

detained at Guantanamo who became leaders of 

foreign terrorist groups

Procedures governing United States citizens 

apprehended inside the United States pursuant to 

the Authorization for Use of Military Force

Prohibition on the use of funds for recreational 

facilities for individuals detained at Guantanamo

Prohibition on transfer or release of individuals 

detained at Guantanamo to Yemen 

Department of Defense representation in dispute 

resolution regarding surrender of Department of 

Defense bands of electromagnetic frequencies

Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People’s 

Republic of China

Cost estimates for nuclear weapons

Report on plans for the disposition of the Mine 

Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle fleet

Limitation on use of funds for public-private 

cooperation activities
Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013 

Quadrennial Defense Review

Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency 

operation plan information to Congress

Report on U.S. citizens subject to military detention

Report on long-term costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom

and Operation Enduring Freedom 

Report on air transportation of supplies for the 

United States

Transportation of supplies to members of the Armed 

Forces from nonprofit organizations

Protection of tier one task critical assets from 

electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave 

systems

Compliance of military departments with minimum safe 

staffing standards 

Determination and disclosure of transportation costs 

incurred by Secretary of Defense for 

congressional trips outside the United States

Transfer to the Department of Homeland Security of the 

Tethered Aerostat Radar System 

Sale or donation of excess personal property for 

border security activities 

Unmanned aircraft systems and National Airspace

Days on which the POW/MIA flag is displayed on certain 

federal property

Sense of Congress on improvised explosive devices 

Sense of Congress to maintain a strong National Guard 

and Military Reserve force

Access of employees of congressional support offices 

to Department of Defense facilities

Cost of wars

Sense of Congress regarding consideration of foreign 

languages and cultures in the building of partner 

capacity

Sense of Congress regarding preservation of second

amendment rights of active duty military 

personnel stationed or residing in the District 

of Columbia

TITLE XI–CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

One-year extension of authority to waive annual 

limitation on premium pay and aggregate 

limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees 

working overseas (sec. 1101)

One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant 

allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel 

on official duty in a combat zone (sec. 1102)
Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority 

for civilian employees of the Department of 

Defense (sec. 1103)

Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance 

payments to Department of Defense employees (sec. 

1104)

Revision to amount of financial assistance under 

Department of Defense Science, Mathematics, and 

Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense 

Education Program and assessment of STEM and 

other programs (sec. 1105)

Extension of program for exchange of informationtechnology personnel (sec. 1106)

Temporary authorities for certain positions at 

Department of Defense research and engineering 

facilities (sec. 1107)

Compliance with law regarding availability of funding 

for civilian personnel (sec. 1108)

Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation 

authority for civilian personnel for care and 

treatment of wounded and injured members of the 

Armed Forces (sec. 1109)

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Flexibility in employment and compensation of civilian 

faculty at certain additional Department of 

Defense schools

TITLE XII–MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

Subtitle A-Assistance and Training

Modification and extension of authorities relating to 

program to build the capacity of foreign military 

forces (sec. 1201)

Global Security Contingency Fund (sec. 1202)

Training of general purpose forces of the United 

States Armed Forces with military and other 

security forces of friendly foreign countries 

(sec. 1203)

Authority to conduct activities to enhance the 

capability of foreign countries to respond to 

incidents involving weapons of mass destruction 

(sec. 1204)

Authorization of National Guard State Partnership 

Program (sec. 1205)

United States security and assistance strategies in 

Africa (sec. 1206)

Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border 

security operations (sec. 1207)
Support of foreign forces participating in operations 

to disarm the Lord's Resistance Army (sec. 1208)

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and 

Iraq

Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan 

(sec. 1211)

One-year extension of authority to use funds for 

reintegration activities in Afghanistan (sec. 

1212)

Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain 

coalition nations for support provided to United 

States military operations (sec. 1213)

Extension and modification of authority to support 

operations and activities of the Office of 

Security Cooperation in Iraq (sec. 1214)

One-year extension and modification of authority for 

program to develop and carry out infrastructure 

projects in Afghanistan (sec. 1215)

Requirement to withhold Department of Defense 

assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 

100 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan 

to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by 

Afghanistan (sec. 1216)

Extension of certain authorities for support of 

foreign forces supporting or participating with 

the United States Armed Forces (sec. 1217)

Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special 

immigrant visa program (sec. 1218)

Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa 

program (sec. 1219)

Subtitle C—Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014

Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network 

activities and finances (sec. 1221)

Completion of accelerated transition of security 

responsibility from United States Armed Forces to 

the Afghan National Security Forces (sec. 1222)

Defense Intelligence Plan (sec. 1223)

Limitation on availability of funds for certain 

authorities for Afghanistan (sec. 1224)

Subtitle D—Matters Relating to Iran

Report on United States military partnership with Gulf 

Cooperation Council countries (sec. 1231)

Additional elements in annual report on military power 

of Iran (sec. 1232)

Integrated air and missile defense programs at 

training locations in Southwest Asia (sec. 1233)

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters
Two-year extension of authorization for nonconventional assisted recovery capabilities (sec. 

1241)

Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual 

report on military and security developments 

involving the People’s Republic of China (sec. 

1242)

Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to 

respond to an attack or other contingency against 

United States diplomatic facilities overseas 

(sec. 1243)

Limitation on establishment of Regional Special 

Operations Forces Coordination Centers (sec. 

1244)

Additional reports on military and security 

developments involving the Democratic People’s 

Republic of Korea (sec. 1245)

Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with 

the Russian Federation and limitations on 

providing certain missile defense information to 

the Russian Federation (sec. 1246)

Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and 

Disarmament Act (sec. 1247)

Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic 

missile proliferation (sec. 1248)

Reports on international agreements relating to the 

Department of Defense (sec. 1249)

Revision of statutory references to former NATO 

support organizations and related NATO agreements 

(sec. 1250)

Executive agreements with the Russian Federation 

relating to ballistic missile defense (sec. 1251)

Rule of construction (sec. 1252)

Limitation on availability of funds to implement the 

Arms Trade Treaty (sec. 1253)

Report on military and security developments involving 

the Russian Federation (sec. 1254)

Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or 

agreements with Rosoboronexport (sec. 1255)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian, 

disaster, and civic aid programs of the 

Department of Defense

Special Immigrant Visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan 

allies
Sense of Congress on commencement of new long-term 

nation building or large-scale infrastructure 

development projects in Afghanistan

Sense of Congress 

Limitation on funds to establish permanent military 

installations or bases in Afghanistan

Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf

Statement of policy on condemning the Government of 

Iran for its state-sponsored persecution of its 

Baha’i minority

Technical correction relating to funding for NATO 

Special Operations Headquarters

Role of the Government of Egypt to United States 

national security

Sense of Congress on the military developments on the 

Korean peninsula

Statement of Congress on defense cooperation with 

Georgia

Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria 

Limitation on availability of funds for Threat 

Reduction Engagement activities and United States 

contributions to the Comprehensive Nuclear-TestBan Treaty

Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation 

between the United States and Burma

Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States 

forces in Europe

Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the 

People’s Republic of China

Sense of Congress regarding relations with Taiwan

Sense of Congress on the threat posed by Hezbollah

Combating crime through intelligence capabilities

War Powers of Congress

Prohibition on use of drones to kill Untied States 

citizens

Sale of F-16 fighter aircraft to Taiwan

Statement of policy and report on the inherent right 

of Israel to self-defense

Report on collective and national security 

implications of Central Asian and South Caucasus 

energy development

Limitation on assistance to provide tear gas or other 

riot control items

Report on certain financial assistance to Afghan 

military

Israel’s right to self-defense
Sense of Congress strongly supporting the full 

implementation of United States and international 

sanctions on Iran and urging the President to 

continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions 

legislation

Sense of Congress on the illegal nuclear weapons 

programs of Iran and North Korea

TITLE XIII–COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs 

and funds (sec. 1301)

Funding allocations (sec. 1302)

Extension of authority for utilization of 

contributions to the cooperative threat reduction 

program (sec. 1303)

Strategy to modernize Cooperative Threat Reduction and 

prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass 

destruction and related materials in the Middle 

East and North Africa region (sec. 1304)

TITLE XIV-OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A-Military Programs

Working capital funds (sec. 1401)

National Defense Sealift Fund (sec. 1402)

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense 

(sec. 1403)

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 

Defense-wide (sec. 1404)

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1405)

Defense Health Program (sec. 1406)

Subtitle B-National Defense Stockpile

Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation 

of a strategic and critical materials supply 

(sec. 1411)

Authority to acquire additional materials for the 

National Defense Stockpile (sec. 1412)

Subtitle C—Other Matters

Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of 

Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. 

Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois (sec. 1421)

Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces 

Retirement Home (sec. 1422)

Cemeterial expenses (sec. 1423)

TITLE XV–AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS 

CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations

Purpose (sec. 1501)

Procurement (sec. 1502)
Research, development, test, and evaluation (sec. 

1503)

Operation and maintenance (sec. 1504)

Military personnel (sec. 1505)

Working capital funds (sec. 1506)

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 

Defense-wide (sec. 1507)

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1508)

Defense Health Program (sec. 1509)

Subtitle B—Financial Matters

Treatment as additional authorizations (sec. 1521)

Special transfer authority (sec. 1522)

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (sec. 1531)

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund (sec. 

1532)

Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device 

Defeat Organization (sec. 1533)

Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and 

Stability Operations in Afghanistan (sec. 1534)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

National Defense Sealift Fund

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense

Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and 

reconnaissance support for Operation Observant 

Compass

Report on U.S. force levels and costs of military 

operations in Afghanistan

Limitation on funds for the Afghanistan Security

Forces Fund to acquire certain aircraft, vehicles, and

equipment

TITLE XVI-INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS

Subtitle A—Defense Industrial Base Matters

Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector 

General of Department of Defense (sec. 1601)

Foreign space activities (sec. 1602)

Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program (sec. 

1603)

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns

Advancing small business growth (sec. 1611)

Amendments relating to Procurement Technical 

Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (sec. 

1612)

Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded 

to small business concerns (sec. 1613)

Credit for certain small business subcontractors (sec. 

1614)
Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify 

certain contracts (sec. 1615)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks 

of meals ready-to-eat

Program to provide federal contracts to early stage 

small businesses

GAO study on subcontracting reporting systems

TITLE XVII–SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND RELATED 

REFORMS

Subtitle A-Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice

Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of 

offenses under the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice (sec. 1701)

Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of 

Military Justice (sec. 1702)

Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on 

trial by court-martial for additional offenses 

involving sex-related crimes (sec. 1703)

Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sexrelated offense in presence of trial counsel, 

counsel for the victim, or a Sexual Assault 

Victim Advocate (sec. 1704)

Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related 

offenses and trial of such offenses by general 

courts-martial (sec. 1705)

Participation by victim in clemency phase of courtsmartial process (sec. 1706)

Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 1707)

Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate 

factor relating to character and military service 

of the accused in rule on initial disposition of 

offenses (sec. 1708)

Prohibition of retaliation against members of the 

Armed Forces for reporting a criminal offense 

(sec. 1709)

Subtitle B-Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code

Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by 

individuals who have been convicted of certain 

sexual offenses (sec. 1711)

Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard 

regarding consideration of request for permanent 

change of station or unit transfer by victim of 

sexual assault (sec. 1712)

Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a 

member of the Armed Forces on active duty who is 
accused of committing a sexual assault or related 

offense (sec. 1713)

Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to 

protected communications of members of the Armed 

Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions (sec. 

1714)

Inspector General investigation of allegations of 

retaliatory personnel actions taken in response 

to making protected communications regarding 

sexual assault (sec. 1715)

Designation and availability of Special Victims’ 

Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses (sec. 

1716)

Subtitle C-Amendments to Other Laws

Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in 

conducting organizational climate assessments for 

purposes of preventing and responding to sexual 

assaults (sec. 1721)

Advancement of submittal deadline for report of 

independent panel on assessment of military 

response systems to sexual assault (sec. 1722)

Retention of certain forms in connection with 

Restricted Reports and Unrestricted Reports on 

sexual assault involving members of the Armed 

Forces (sec. 1723)

Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators 

by members of the National Guard and Reserves 

(sec. 1724)

Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense 

sexual assault prevention and response personnel 

and required availability of Sexual Assault Nurse 

Examiners (sec. 1725)

Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault 

Prevention and Response Office for Department of 

Defense sexual assault prevention and response 

program (sec. 1726)

Subtitle D-Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports

Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of 

Military Justice and judicial proceedings of 

sexual assault cases (sec. 1731)

Review and policy regarding Department of Defense 

investigative practices in response to 

allegations of Uniform Code of Military Justice 

violations (sec. 1732)

Review of training and education provided members of 

the Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and 

response (sec. 1733)
Report on implementation of Department of Defense 

policy on the retention of and access to evidence 

and records relating to sexual assaults involving 

members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1734)

Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal 

Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases (sec. 

1735)

Subtitle E-Other Matters

Enhanced protections for prospective members and new 

members of the Armed Forces during entry-level 

processing and training (sec. 1741)

Commanding officer action on reports on sexual 

offenses involving members of the Armed Forces 

(sec. 1742)

Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response 

to unrestricted report of sexual assault in which 

the victim is a member of the Armed Forces (sec. 

1743)

Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain 

sex-related offenses for trial by court-martial 

(sec. 1744)

Inclusion and command review of information on sexrelated offenses in personnel service records of 

members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1745)

Prevention of sexual assault at military service 

academies (sec. 1746)

Required notification whenever members of the Armed 

Forces are completing Standard Form 86 of the 

Questionnaire for National Security Positions 

(sec. 1747)

Subtitle F-Sense of Congress Provisions

Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility 

for command climate free of retaliation (sec. 

1751)

Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving 

certain sexual misconduct offenses under the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice through courtsmartial (sec. 1752)

Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of courtmartial of members of the Armed Forces who commit 

sex-related offenses (sec. 1753)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Servicemembers’ accountability, rights, and 

responsibilities training

Inspector General of the Department of Defense review 

of separation of members of the Armed Forces who 

made unrestricted reports of sexual assault 
Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in 

military justice process

Enhancement to requirements for availability of 

information on sexual assault prevention and 

response resources

Health welfare inspections

Division B–Military Construction Authorizations

Summary and explanation of funding tables

Legislative Provisions Adopted

Short title (sec. 2001)

Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to 

be specified by law (sec. 2002)

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Effective date

TITLE XXI–ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Summary

Legislative Provisions Adopted

Authorized Army construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2101)

Family housing (sec. 2102)

Authorization of appropriations, Army (sec. 2103)

Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United 

States Military Academy, New York (sec. 2104)

Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 

2004 project (sec. 2105)

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal 

year 2010 project (sec. 2106)

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal 

year 2011 project (sec. 2107)

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 

2010 projects (sec. 2108)

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 

2011 projects (sec. 2109)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. 

Merrill, Dahlonega, Georgia

Authorized Army construction and land acquisition 

project

TITLE XXII–NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Summary

Legislative Provisions Adopted

Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2201)

Family housing (sec. 2202)

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 

2203)

Authorization of appropriations, Navy (sec. 2204)
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal 

year 2011 project (sec. 2205)

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal 

year 2012 project (sec. 2206)

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 

2011 projects (sec. 2207)

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Limitation on project authorization to carry out 

certain fiscal year 2014 project

TITLE XXIII–AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Summary

Legislative Provisions Adopted

Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2301)

Family housing (sec. 2302)

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 

2303)

Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (sec. 2304)

Limitation on project authorization to carry out 

certain fiscal year 2014 project (sec. 2305)

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal 

year 2013 project (sec. 2306)

Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 

project (sec. 2307)

TITLE XXIV–DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Budget Items

Summary

U.S. Special Operations Command Military Construction 

Requirements

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations

Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land 

acquisition projects (sec. 2401)

Authorized energy conservation projects (sec. 2402)

Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies 

(sec. 2403)

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations

Authorization of appropriations, chemical 

demilitarization construction, defense-wide (sec. 

2411)

TITLE XXV–NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT 

PROGRAM

Summary

Legislative Provisions Adopted

Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2501)

Authorization of appropriations, NATO (sec. 2502)

TITLE XXVI–GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES
Summary

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of 

Appropriations

Authorized Army National Guard construction and land 

acquisition projects (sec. 2601)

Authorized Army Reserve construction and land 

acquisition projects (sec. 2602)

Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 

construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2603)

Authorized Air National Guard construction and land 

acquisition projects (sec. 2604)

Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land 

acquisition projects (sec. 2605)

Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and 

Reserve (sec. 2606)

Subtitle B—Other Matters

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal 

year 2013 project (sec. 2611)

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 

2011 projects (sec. 2612)

TITLE XXVII–BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

Summary

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations

Authorization of appropriations for base realignment 

and closure activities funded through Department

of Defense Base Closure Account (sec. 2701)

Subtitle B—Other Matters

Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment 

and Closure (BRAC) round (sec. 2711)

Elimination of quarterly certification requirement 

regarding availability of military health care in 

National Capital Region (sec. 2712)

Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint 

basing initiative (sec. 2713)

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Consideration of the value of services provided by a 

local community to the Armed Forces as part of 

the economic analysis in making base realignment 

or closure decisions

TITLE XXVIII–MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A–Military Construction Program and Military 

Family Housing Changes

Modification and extension of authority to utilize 

unspecified minor military construction authority 

for laboratory revitalization projects (sec. 

2801)
Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited 

partnerships with private developers of housing 

(sec. 2802)

Military construction standards to improve force 

protection (sec. 2803)

Application of cash payments received for utilities 

and services (sec. 2804)

Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of 

military housing investment authority (sec. 2805)

Additional element for annual report on military 

housing privatization projects (sec. 2806)

Policies and requirements regarding overseas military 

construction and closure and realignment of 

United States military installations in foreign 

countries (sec. 2807)

Extension and modification of temporary, limited 

authority to use operation and maintenance funds 

for construction projects in certain areas 

outside the United States (sec. 2808)

Limitation on construction projects in European 

Command area of responsibility (sec. 2809)

Subtitle B–Real Property and Facilities Administration

Development of master plans for major military 

installations (sec. 2811)

Authority for acceptance of funds to cover 

administrative expenses associated with real 

property leases and easements (sec. 2812)

Modification of authority to enter into long-term 

contracts for receipt of utility services as 

consideration for utility systems conveyances 

(sec. 2813)

Report on efficient utilization of Department of 

Defense real property (sec. 2814)

Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Piñon 

Canyon Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado (sec. 

2815)

Subtitle C–Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military 

Realignment

Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal 

year for period covered by annual report of 

Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors 

General for Guam Realignment (sec. 2821)

Realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific 

Region (sec. 2822)

Subtitle D–Land Conveyances

Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, 

California (sec. 2831)
Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura 

County, California (sec. 2832)

Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, 

Hawaii (sec. 2833)

Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (sec. 2834)

Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah (sec. 2835)

Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis 

Peak, Wasatch Mountains, Utah (sec. 2836)

Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve 

Centers, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and 

Pennsylvania (sec. 2837)

Subtitle E–Other Matters

Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee 

reporting requirement (sec. 2841)

Establishment of military divers memorial (sec. 2842)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Repeal of requirements for local comparability of room 

patterns and floor areas for military family 

housing and submission of net floor area 

information

Department of Defense report on Military Housing 

Privatization Initiative

Continuation of limitation on use of funds for 

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design 

(LEED) gold or platinum certification

Land conveyance, former Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia

Naming Provisions

Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National 

Historical Park, Ohio

Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National 

Memorial in Riverside, California

Inclusion of emblems of belief as part of military 

memorials

TITLE XXIX-WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF PUBLIC LANDS 

TO SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY

Short title (sec. 2901)

Definitions (sec. 2902)

Subtitle A-General Provisions

General applicability; definitions (sec. 2911)

Maps and legal descriptions (sec. 2912)

Access restrictions (sec. 2913)

Changes in use (sec. 2914)

Brush and range fire prevention and suppression (sec. 

2915)

Ongoing decontamination (sec. 2916)

Water rights (sec. 2917)
Hunting, fishing, and trapping (sec. 2918)

Limitation on extensions and renewals (sec. 2919)

Application for renewal of a withdrawal and 

reservation (sec. 2920)

Limitation on subsequent availability of land for 

appropriation (sec. 2921)

Relinquishment (sec. 2922)

Immunity of the United States (sec. 2923)

Subtitle B-Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2931)

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2932)

Special rules governing minerals management (sec. 

2933)

Grazing (sec. 2934)

Payments in lieu of taxes (sec. 2935)

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2936)

Subtitle C-Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine 

Palms, California

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2941)

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2942)

Public access (sec. 2943)

Resource management group (sec. 2944)

Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area 

(sec. 2945)

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2946)

Subtitle D-White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort 

Bliss, Texas

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2951)

Grazing (sec. 2952)

Subtitle E-Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, 

California

Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land 

(sec. 2961)

Management and use of transferred land (sec. 2962)

Effect of termination of military use (sec. 2963)

Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period 

(sec. 2964)

Water rights (sec. 2965)

Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of 

title (sec. 2966)

Subtitle F-Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2971)

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2972)

Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary 

of the Navy (sec. 2973)

Geothermal resources (sec. 2974)

Wild horses and burros (sec. 2975)
Continuation of existing agreement (sec. 2976)

Management plans (sec. 2977)

Termination of prior withdrawals (sec. 2978)

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2979)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Water rights

Withdrawal

Water rights

Withdrawal

Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Southern 

Study Area, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat 

Center, Twentynine Palms, California

Water rights

DIVISION C–DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS 

AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE XXXI–DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

Overview

Budget Item

Project 99-D-143, mixed oxide fuel fabrication 

facility

Subtitle A–National Security Programs Authorizations

National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101)

Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102)

Other defense activities (sec. 3103)

Subtitle B-Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and 

Limitations

Clarification of principles of National Nuclear 

Security Administration (sec. 3111)

Cost estimation and program evaluation by National 

Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3112)

Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain 

risk (sec. 3113)

Limitation on availability of funds for National 

Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3114)

Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the 

Administrator for Nuclear Security (sec. 3115)

Establishment of Center for Security Technology, 

Analysis, Response, and Testing (sec. 3116)

Authorization of modular building strategy as an 

alternative to the replacement project for the 

Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building, Los 

Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico (sec. 

3117)

Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options 

(sec. 3118)
Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter 

into transactions to carry out certain research 

projects (sec. 3119)

Increase in construction design threshold (sec. 3120)

Subtitle C-Plans and Reports

Annual report and certification on status of security 

of atomic energy defense facilities (sec. 3121)

Modifications to annual reports regarding the 

condition of the nuclear weapons stockpile (sec. 

3122)

Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear 

weapons stockpile stewardship, management, and 

infrastructure plan (sec. 3123)

Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition 

of management and operating contracts (sec. 3124)

Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating 

to program on scientific engagement for 

nonproliferation (sec. 3125)

Modification of certain reports on cost containment 

for uranium capabilities replacement project 

(sec. 3126)

Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear 

Reservation (sec. 3127)

Plan for improvement and integration of financial 

management of nuclear security enterprise (sec. 

3128)

Plan for developing exascale computing and 

incorporating such computing into the stockpile 

stewardship program (sec. 3129)

Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program 

principles (sec. 3130)

Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries 

(sec. 3131)

Repeal of certain reporting requirements (sec. 3132)

Subtitle D-Other Matters

Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy (sec. 

3141)

Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory 

Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security 

Enterprise (sec. 3142)

Department of Energy land conveyances (sec. 3143)

Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (sec. 

3144)

Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security 

Administration Act (sec. 3145)

Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act 

(sec. 3146)
Sense of Congress on B61-12 life extension program 

(sec. 3147)

Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory 

board on toxic substances and worker health (sec. 

3148)

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Energy security and assurance

Termination of Department of Energy Employees to 

Protect National Security

Assessment of nuclear nonproliferation programs of the 

National Nuclear Security Administration

Government Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Extension

Manhattan Project National Historic Park

TITLE XXXII-DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Authorization (sec. 3201)

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Improvements to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 

Board

TITLE XXXIV-NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 3401)

TITLE XXXV-MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

Authorization of appropriations for national security 

aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 

2014 (sec. 3501)

5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance 

program (sec. 3502)

Sense of Congress (sec. 3503)

Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation 

maritime facility, Port of Anchorage, Alaska 

(sec. 3504)

Strategic seaports (sec. 3505)

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Maritime Administration

DIVISION D–FUNDING TABLES

Authorization of amounts in funding tables (sec. 4001)
1

Compliance with rules of the House of Representatives and Senate

regarding earmarks and congressionally directed spending items

Consistent with the intent of clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules 

of the House of Representatives and Rule XLIV of the Standing 

Rules of the Senate, neither the bill nor the accompanying joint

explanatory statement contains any congressional earmarks,

congressionally directed spending items, limited tax benefits,

or limited tariff benefits, as defined in such rules.

Summary of discretionary authorizations and budget implication

The administration’s budget request for national defense 

discretionary programs within the jurisdiction of the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

for fiscal year 2014 was $625.2 billion. Of this amount, $526.6 

billion was requested for base Department of Defense (DOD) 

programs, $80.7 billion was requested for overseas contingency 

operations (OCO), and $17.9 billion was requested for national 

security programs in the Department of Energy (DOE) and the 

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB).

The bill authorizes $625.1 billion in fiscal year 2014, 

including $526.8 billion for base DOD programs, $80.7 billion 

for OCO, and $17.6 billion for national security programs in the 

DOE and the DNFSB.

The two tables preceding the detailed program adjustments 

in Division D of this Joint Explanatory Statement summarize the 

direct discretionary authorizations in the agreement and the 

equivalent budget authority levels for fiscal year 2014 defense 

programs. The first table summarizes the agreement on 

authorizations within the jurisdiction of the Armed Services 

Committees. The second table details the budget authority 

implication of the discretionary authorizations in the agreement 

when accounting for national defense items that are not in the 

jurisdiction of the Armed Services Committees.
2 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

DISCRETIONARY AUTHORIZATIONS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 

Function 051, Department of Defense-Military 

Division A: Department of Defense Authorizations 

Title I—Procurement 

Aircraft Procurement, Army ......................................... 5,024,387 3,939 5,028,326 

Missile Procurement, Army .......................................... 1,334,083 1,334,083 

Weapons & Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army .............. 1,597,267 5,561 1,602,828 

Procurement of Ammunition, Army .............................. 1,540,437 –84,800 1,455,637 

Other Procurement, Army ............................................. 6,465,218 –54,300 6,410,918 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy .......................................... 17,927,651 –52,248 17,875,403 

Weapons Procurement, Navy ....................................... 3,122,193 –12,050 3,110,143 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy & Marine Corps ... 589,267 589,267 

Shipbuilding & Conversion, Navy ................................ 14,077,804 656,229 14,734,033 

Other Procurement, Navy ............................................. 6,310,257 –43,005 6,267,252 

Procurement, Marine Corps ......................................... 1,343,511 –18,008 1,325,503 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ................................... 11,398,901 –74,920 11,323,981 

Missile Procurement, Air Force .................................... 5,343,286 5,343,286 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ....................... 759,442 759,442 

Other Procurement, Air Force ...................................... 16,760,581 –13,738 16,746,843 

Procurement, Defense-Wide ......................................... 4,534,083 1,221 4,535,304 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund ......................... 98,800 –98,800 0 

Subtotal, Title I—Procurement ................................. 98,227,168 215,081 98,442,249 

Title II—Research, Development, Test and Evaluation 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army ...... 7,989,102 –34,970 7,954,132 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy ...... 15,974,780 –312,959 15,661,821 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force 25,702,946 16,000 25,718,946 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, DefenseWide ......................................................................... 17,667,108 551,156 18,218,264 

Operational Test & Evaluation, Defense ..................... 186,300 186,300 

Subtotal, Title II—Research, Development, Test 

and Evaluation ........................................................ 67,520,236 219,227 67,739,463 

Title III—Operation and Maintenance 

Operation & Maintenance, Army ................................. 35,073,077 624,700 35,697,777 

Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve .................... 3,095,036 112,200 3,207,236 

Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard ........ 7,054,196 45,903 7,100,099 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy .................................. 39,945,237 457,368 40,402,605 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps .................... 6,254,650 131,000 6,385,650 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve .................... 1,197,752 15,800 1,213,552 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve ...... 263,317 300 263,617 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force ........................... 37,270,842 269,425 37,540,267 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve ............. 3,164,607 4,570 3,169,177 

Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard ........... 6,566,004 28,200 6,594,204 

Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide .................... 32,997,693 –237,281 32,760,412 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\P_TSUMM.LOC

December 9, 2013 (8:02 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, Defense .. 13,606 13,606 

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid ........ 109,500 109,500 

Cooperative Threat Reduction ..................................... 528,455 528,455 

Defense Acquisition Development Workforce Fund ..... 256,031 –124,700 131,331 

Environmental Restoration, Army ................................ 298,815 298,815 

Environmental Restoration, Navy ................................ 316,103 316,103 

Environmental Restoration, Air Force .......................... 439,820 439,820 

Environmental Restoration, Defense ........................... 10,757 10,757 

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Sites ........ 237,443 237,443 

Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund ....... 5,000 –5,000 0 

Subtotal, Title III—Operation and Maintenance ...... 175,097,941 1,322,485 176,420,426 

Title IV—Military Personnel 

Military Personnel Appropriations ................................ 130,399,881 –682,900 129,716,981 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions 6,676,750 6,676,750 

Subtotal, Title IV—Military Personnel ...................... 137,076,631 –682,900 136,393,731 

Title XIV—Other Authorizations 

Working Capital Fund, Army ........................................ 25,158 25,158 

Working Capital Fund, Air Force ................................. 61,731 61,731 

Working Capital Fund, Defense-Wide .......................... 46,428 46,428 

Working Capital Fund, DECA ....................................... 1,412,510 1,412,510 

National Defense Sealift Fund .................................... 730,700 –112,200 618,500 

Defense Health Program .............................................. 33,054,528 –124,000 32,930,528 

Chemical Agents & Munitions Destruction ................. 1,057,123 1,057,123 

Drug Interdiction and Counter Drug Activities ........... 938,545 938,545 

Office of the Inspector General ................................... 312,131 34,869 347,000 

Subtotal, Title XIV—Other Authorizations ................ 37,638,854 –201,331 37,437,523 

Total, Division A: Department of Defense Authorizations ........................................................................ 515,560,830 872,562 516,433,392 

Division B: Military Construction Authorizations 

Military Construction 

Army ............................................................................. 1,119,875 –10,000 1,109,875 

Navy ............................................................................. 1,700,269 1,700,269 

Air Force ....................................................................... 1,156,573 –17,730 1,138,843 

Defense-Wide ............................................................... 3,985,300 –572,050 3,413,250 

Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense ....... 122,536 122,536 

NATO Security Investment Program ............................. 239,700 –40,000 199,700 

Army National Guard ................................................... 320,815 –5,000 315,815 

Army Reserve ............................................................... 174,060 174,060 

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve ................................. 32,976 32,976 

Air National Guard ....................................................... 119,800 119,800 

Air Force Reserve ......................................................... 45,659 45,659 

Subtotal, Military Construction .................................. 9,017,563 –644,780 8,372,783 

Family Housing 

Construction, Army ...................................................... 44,008 44,008 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\P_TSUMM.LOC

December 9, 2013 (8:02 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
4 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Operation & Maintenance, Army ................................. 512,871 512,871 

Construction, Navy and Marine Corps ........................ 73,407 73,407 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps ... 389,844 389,844 

Construction, Air Force ................................................ 76,360 76,360 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force ........................... 388,598 388,598 

Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide .................... 55,845 55,845 

Family Housing Improvement Fund ............................. 1,780 1,780 

Subtotal, Family Housing ........................................... 1,542,713 1,542,713 

Base Realignment and Closure 

Base Realignment and Closure—Army ...................... 180,401 180,401 

Base Realignment and Closure—Navy ....................... 144,580 144,580 

Base Realignment and Closure—Air Force ................ 126,376 126,376 

Subtotal, Base Realignment and Closure ................. 451,357 451,357 

Total, Division B: Military Construction Authorizations ........................................................................ 11,011,633 –644,780 10,366,853 

Total, 051, Department of Defense-Military ............. 526,572,463 227,782 526,800,245 

Function 053, Atomic Energy Defense Activities 

Division C: Department of Energy National Security Authorization and Other Authorizations 

Department of Energy Authorizations 

Energy Programs 

Electricity delivery and energy reliability .................... 16,000 –16,000 0 

Nuclear Energy ............................................................. 94,000 94,000 

Subtotal, Energy Programs ........................................ 110,000 –16,000 94,000 

National Nuclear Security Administration 

Weapons Activities ....................................................... 7,868,409 40,843 7,909,252 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ................................ 2,140,142 40,000 2,180,142 

Naval Reactors ............................................................ 1,246,134 1,246,134 

Office of the Administrator ......................................... 397,784 –8,000 389,784 

Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration 11,652,469 72,843 11,725,312 

Environmental and Other Defense Activities: 

Defense Environmental Cleanup ................................. 5,316,909 –301,500 5,015,409 

Other Defense Activities .............................................. 749,080 9,578 758,658 

Subtotal, Environmental and Other Defense Activities .......................................................................... 6,065,989 -291,922 5,774,067 

Subtotal, Department of Energy Authorizations ....... 17,828,458 –235,079 17,593,379 

Independent Federal Agency Authorization 

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board ..................... 29,915 29,915 

Subtotal, Independent Federal Agency Authorization .......................................................................... 29,915 29,915 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\P_TSUMM.LOC

December 9, 2013 (8:02 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
5 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Subtotal, Division C: Department of Energy National Security Authorization and Other Authorizations ................................................................... 17,858,373 –235,079 17,623,294 

Subtotal, 053, Atomic Energy Defense Activities ..... 17,858,373 –235,079 17,623,294 

Total, National Defense Funding, Base Budget Request ....................................................................... 544,430,836 –7,297 544,423,539 

National Defense Funding, OCO Budget Request 

Function 051, Department of Defense-Military 

Procurement 

Aircraft Procurement, Army ......................................... 771,788 771,788 

Missile Procurement, Army .......................................... 128,645 128,645 

Procurement of Ammunition, Army .............................. 180,900 180,900 

Other Procurement, Army ............................................. 603,123 603,123 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund .......... 1,000,000 –45,000 955,000 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy .......................................... 240,696 240,696 

Weapons Procurement, Navy ....................................... 86,500 86,500 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy & Marine Corps ... 206,821 206,821 

Other Procurement, Navy ............................................. 17,968 17,968 

Procurement, Marine Corps ......................................... 129,584 –2,898 126,686 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ................................... 115,668 115,668 

Missile Procurement, Air Force .................................... 24,200 24,200 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ....................... 159,965 159,965 

Other Procurement, Air Force ...................................... 2,574,846 2,574,846 

Procurement, Defense-Wide ......................................... 111,275 111,275 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund ......................... 15,000 –15,000 0 

National Guard & Reserve Equipment ........................ 0 400,000 400,000 

Subtotal, Procurement ............................................... 6,366,979 337,102 6,704,081 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army ...... 7,000 7,000 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy ...... 34,426 34,426 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force 9,000 9,000 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, DefenseWide ......................................................................... 66,208 66,208 

Subtotal, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation .......................................................................... 116,634 116,634 

Operation and Maintenance 

Operation & Maintenance, Army ................................. 29,279,633 1,100,000 30,379,633 

Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve .................... 42,935 42,935 

Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard ........ 199,371 199,371 

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund ............................... 7,726,720 –1,500,000 6,226,720 

Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund ................................. 279,000 –29,000 250,000 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy .................................. 6,067,993 6,067,993 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps .................... 2,669,815 2,669,815 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\P_TSUMM.LOC

December 9, 2013 (8:02 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
6 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve .................... 55,700 55,700 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve ...... 12,534 12,534 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force ........................... 10,005,224 130,000 10,135,224 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve ............. 32,849 32,849 

Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard ........... 22,200 22,200 

Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide .................... 6,435,078 6,435,078 

Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance ....................... 62,829,052 –299,000 62,530,052 

Military Personnel 

Military Personnel Appropriations ................................ 9,689,307 –40,500 9,648,807 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions 164,033 164,033 

Subtotal, Military Personnel ...................................... 9,853,340 –40,500 9,812,840 

Other Authorizations 

Working Capital Fund, Army ........................................ 44,732 44,732 

Working Capital Fund, Air Force ................................. 88,500 88,500 

Working Capital Fund, Defense-Wide .......................... 131,678 131,678 

Defense Health Program .............................................. 904,201 904,201 

Drug Interdiction and Counter Drug Activities ........... 376,305 376,305 

Office of the Inspector General ................................... 10,766 10,766 

Subtotal, Other Authorizations ................................... 1,556,182 1,556,182 

Total, National Defense Funding, OCO Budget Request ....................................................................... 80,722,187 –2,398 80,719,789 

Total, National Defense .............................................. 625,153,023 –9,695 625,143,328 

MEMORANDUM: NON-DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 

Title XIV—Armed Forces Retirement Home (Function 

600) ......................................................................... 67,800 67,800 

Title XIV—Cemeterial Expenses, Army (Function 700) 45,800 25,000 70,800 

Title XXXIV—Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves (Function 270) ............................................. 20,000 20,000 

Title XXXV—Maritime Administration (Function 400) 152,168 45,000 197,168 

MEMORANDUM: TRANSFER AUTHORITIES (NON-ADD) 

Title X—General Transfer Authority ............................ [4,000,000 ] [1,000,000 ] [5,000,000 ] 

Title XV—Special Transfer Authority .......................... [4,000,000 ] [4,000,000 ] 

MEMORANDUM: DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS NOT UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE (NON-ADD) 

Defense Production Act ............................................... [25,135 ] [25,135 ] 

Æ 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\P_TSUMM.LOC

December 9, 2013 (8:02 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET AUTHORITY IMPLICATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Summary, Discretionary Authorizations Within the Jurisdiction of the Armed Services Committee 

SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (051) ........................... 526,572,463 227,782 526,800,245 

SUBTOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE PROGRAMS (053) ........ 17,858,373 –235,079 17,623,294 

TOTAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE (050)—BASE BILL ........................ 544,430,836 –7,297 544,423,539 

TOTAL, OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS ........................ 80,722,187 –2,398 80,719,789 

GRAND TOTAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE ........................................... 625,153,023 –9,695 625,143,328 

Base National Defense Discretionary Programs that are 

Not In the Jurisdiction of the Armed Services Committee or Do Not Require Additional Authorization 

Defense Production Act Purchases ............................................ 25,135 25,135 

Indefinite Account: Disposal Of DOD Real Property .................. 10,000 10,000 

Indefinite Account: Lease Of DOD Real Property ...................... 30,000 30,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 051 ........................................ 65,135 65,135 

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program ..................... 104,000 104,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 053 ........................................ 104,000 104,000 

Other Discretionary Programs .................................................... 7,407,000 7,407,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 054 ........................................ 7,407,000 7,407,000 

Total Defense Discretionary Adjustments (050) ..................... 7,576,135 7,576,135 

Budget Authority Implication, National Defense Discretionary 

Department of Defense--Military (051) ..................................... 607,359,785 225,384 607,585,169 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities (053) .................................... 17,962,373 –235,079 17,727,294 

Defense-Related Activities (054) ............................................... 7,407,000 7,407,000 

Total BA Implication, National Defense Discretionary ........... 632,729,158 –9,695 632,719,463 

National Defense Mandatory Programs, Current Law 

Concurrent receipt accrual payments to the Military Retirement Fund (OMB Estimate) .................................................. 6,970,000 6,970,000 

Revolving, trust and other DOD Mandatory .............................. 1,156,000 1,156,000 

Offsetting receipts ..................................................................... –1,752,000 –1,752,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 051 ........................................ 6,374,000 6,374,000 

Energy employees occupational illness compensation programs and other ................................................................... 1,281,000 1,281,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 053 ........................................ 1,281,000 1,281,000 

Radiation exposure compensation trust fund ........................... 76,000 76,000 

Payment to CIA retirement fund and other .............................. 514,000 514,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 054 ........................................ 590,000 590,000 

Total National Defense Mandatory (050) ................................ 8,245,000 8,245,000 

Budget Authority Implication, National Defense Discretionary and Mandatory 

Department of Defense--Military (051) ..................................... 613,733,785 225,384 613,959,169 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities (053) .................................... 19,243,373 –235,079 19,008,294 

Defense-Related Activities (054) ............................................... 7,997,000 7,997,000 

Total BA Implication, National Defense Discretionary and 

Mandatory ............................................................................. 640,974,158 –9,695 640,964,463 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\P_TIMP.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

Æ 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\P_TIMP.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2

DIVISION A–Department of Defense 

Authorizations

TITLE I–PROCUREMENT

Subtitle A–Authorization of Appropriations

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 101)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 101) authorizing 

appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for procurement for the 

Army, the Navy and Marine Corps, the Air Force, and defense-wide 

activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 101).

The agreement includes this provision.

Subtitle B–Army Programs

Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program 

(sec. 111)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 111) that would 

limit the availability of funds for the Stryker vehicle program 

to not more than 75 percent until the Secretary of the Army 

submits a report on Stryker spare parts inventories.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority for 

tactical vehicles (sec. 112)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 142) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to enter into a 5-year pilot 

program for the multiyear multivehicle procurement of tactical 

wheeled vehicles.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 

that would express a sense of Congress and require a study and 

report on multiyear multivehicle procurement.
3

Subtitle C–Navy Programs

CVN–78 class aircraft carrier program (sec. 121)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 122) that would

amend section 122 of the John Warner National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) by: 

(1) Adjusting the cap for CVN-78 from $10,500.0 million to 

$12,887.0 million; (2) Adjusting the cost cap for subsequent 

ships in the class from $8,100.0 million to $11,411.0 million; 

and (3) Adding a new factor for adjustment, allowing increases 

or decreases in the cost of CVN-78 that are attributable to the 

shipboard test program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 122) that would amend section 122 by: (1) 

Adjusting the cost cap for CVN-78 from $10,500.0 million to 

$12,887.0 million; (2) Adding a new factor for adjustment, 

allowing increases or decreases in the cost of the CVN-78 class 

that are attributable to the shipboard test program; (3) 

Requiring quarterly updates on the cost of CVN-79; and (4) 

Preventing the Navy from paying fees under any cost-type or 

incentive fee contract if the program manager’s estimate of the 

total cost of CVN-79 exceeds the cost cap for CVN-79. 

The agreement includes a provision that would amend section 

122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) by: (1) Adjusting the cap 

for CVN-78 from $10,500.0 million to $12,887.0 million; (2) 

Adjusting the cost cap for subsequent ships in the class from 

$8,100.0 million to $11,498.0 million; (3) Adding a new factor 

for adjustment, allowing increases or decreases in the cost of 

CVN-78 that are attributable to the shipboard test program, but 

only when the changes result for urgent and unforeseen testing 

problems that would delay delivery or initial operating 

capability of the ship; (4) Requiring quarterly updates on the 

cost of CVN-79; and (5) Directing the Secretary of the Navy to 

ensure that each prime contract for CVN-79 includes an incentive 

fee structure that will, throughout the entire period of 

performance of the contract, provide incentives for each 

contractor to meet the portion of the cost of the ship for which 

the contractor is responsible. 

Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future surface 

combatants (sec. 122)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 123) that would repeal a reporting requirement in section 

125 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
4

2010 (Public Law 111-84). The report submitted by the Secretary 

of the Navy to Congress of February 2010 provided the Department 

of the Navy’s implementation plan to complete these reports. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft program (sec. 

123)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 121) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Navy to buy E-2D aircraft and E2D mission equipment under one or more multiyear procurement 

contracts. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 121) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to buy 

E-2D aircraft under one or more multiyear procurement contracts. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship

(sec. 124)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 125) that would require that the Chief of Naval Operations 

(CNO), in coordination with the Director of Operational Test and 

Evaluation, to submit a report to the congressional defense 

committees on the current concept of operations and expected 

survivability attributes of each of the Littoral Combat Ship 

(LCS) sea frames when they would be employed according to the 

concept of operations.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would fence funding for LCS-25 and LCS-26 until: 

(1) The Navy provides certain reports about the LCS program; and 

(2) The Joint Requirements Oversight Council makes certain 

certifications about the LCS program.

Subtitle D–Air Force Programs

Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC–135E 

aircraft (sec. 131)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 133) that would repeal section 135(b) of the John Warner 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public 

Law 109-364). Section 135(b) requires that the Secretary of the 

Air Force maintain at least 74 of the KC-135E aircraft retired 

after September 30, 2006 in a condition that would allow recall 
5

of the aircraft to future service in the Air Force Reserve, Air 

National Guard, or active forces aerial refueling force 

structure. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The House bill, however, contained a provision (sec. 133) 

that would require that the Secretary of the Air Force maintain 

any retired KC-135R aircraft in a condition that would allow 

recall of the aircraft to future service in the Air Force 

Reserve, Air National Guard, or active forces aerial refueling 

force structure. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical/clarifying amendment.

Multiyear procurement authority for C–130J aircraft (sec. 132)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 131) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to enter into one or 

more multiyear contracts to procure multiple variants of the C130J aircraft. 

 The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 151) that would allow the Secretary of the Air 

Force to enter into one or more multiyear contracts to procure 

C-130J aircraft.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics 

modernization program for C–130 aircraft (sec. 133)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 132) that would 

prohibit the Secretary of the Air Force from terminating the 

legacy C–130H Avionics Modernization Program (AMP). The House 

report accompanying H.R. 1960 (H. Rept. 113-102) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 recommended an 

increase of $47.3 million in Aircraft Procurement, Air Force 

(APAF), to fund modifications of legacy C-130 with the original 

AMP upgrade. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. The Senate report accompanying S. 1197 (S. Rept. 

113-44) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2014 recommended an increase of $47.3 million in APAF to 

fund modifications of legacy C-130 with either: (1) the original 

AMP upgrade; or (2) an alternative program that would upgrade 

and modernize the legacy C–130 airlift fleet using a reduced 

scope program for avionics and mission planning systems. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would add a requirement that the Comptroller 

General conduct a sufficiency review of the cost-benefit 
6

analysis conducted under section 143(b) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239), 

including any findings and recommendations relating to such 

review. The agreement also recommends an increase of $47.3 

million for Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air 

Force, in PE 41115F for C-130 Airlift Squadrons, pending 

completion of that sufficiency review. This is in lieu of a 

recommendation for additional procurement funding in fiscal year 

2014, since procurement funding for modernizing C-130 avionics 

would be premature.

Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C–27J aircraft by the 

Air Force (sec. 134)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 134) that would prevent the Secretary of the Air Force 

from obligating or expending any funds for the procurement of C27J aircraft not on contract as of June 1, 2013. 

 The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the provision with an amendment that 

would narrow the prohibition to the use of funds authorized in 

fiscal year 2012, since all C-27J funds except the fiscal year 

2012 funds have been obligated or transferred to other programs.

Subtitle E–Defense-Wide, Joint, and 

Multiservice Matters

Personal protection equipment procurement (sec. 141)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 144) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that within each 

military service procurement account, a separate procurement 

budget line item is designated for personal protection equipment 

(PPE) investment and funding transparency.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 

that would direct the Secretary of Defense to submit with the 

annual budget request a consolidated budget display that 

describes and justifies all programs and activities, in the 

appropriations accounts for operation and maintenance as well as 

research, development, test, and evaluation, associated with the 

development and procurement of PPE.

After 12 years of war and billions of dollars spent to 

develop, produce, and field the best available individual PPE, 

such as body armor and helmets, the Department of Defense should 
7

not lose momentum in its search for better protection at lower 

weight and cost for individual soldiers, marines, airmen, and 

sailors. One of the most important lessons of the wars in Iraq 

and Afghanistan is that research, development, and acquisition 

(RDA) of improved ballistic protection for our troops must 

anticipate, not react, to likely threats. In this regard, 

budget visibility must be sufficient to allow for comprehensive 

oversight of the Department's RDA efforts as reflected in the 

annual budget request accompanied by spending estimates 

projected over the subsequent 5 years. Subject to the 

completeness and usefulness of the information provided in the 

budget exhibits that would be required by this provision, 

Congress may consider other budgetary methods for ensuring the 

Department's investments over time sustain the importance of and 

momentum for achieving technological improvements in PPE into 

the future.

We also note that the Department categorizes PPE, including 

body armor, as an “expendable” item consistent with current 

acquisition and financial management policy definitions. 

Nonetheless, given the military’s experiences during operations 

in Iraq and Afghanistan, the significant RDA investment for body 

armor, and the fact that body armor is now an essential part of 

individual combat equipment, one could question whether the 

categorization of PPE, and body armor in particular, should 

change from “expendable” to another category that could improve 

resource stability and provide for better management throughout 

the RDA process. Accordingly, the Secretary of Defense is 

encouraged to reassess the Department’s categorization of PPE 

and body armor as “expendable” items.

Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements (sec. 142)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 145) that would 

amend section 122 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) to 

eliminate the requirement to provide an annual update to the F35 system maturity matrix. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ–4 

Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems and A-10 aircraft (sec.

143)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 143) that would 

limit the use of funds to retire Global Hawk Block 30 unmanned 
8

aircraft systems and would require the Secretary of the Air 

Force to take all actions necessary to maintain the operational 

capability of the RQ–4 Block 30 Global Hawk through December 31, 

2016.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would: (1) Prohibit spending funds authorized to 

be appropriated or otherwise made available during fiscal year 

2014 to retire Global Hawk Block 30 unmanned aircraft systems or 

A-10 aircraft (except for A-10s planned for retirement on or 

before April 9, 2013); (2) Modify the prohibited spending to 

include making significant changes to Global Hawk and A-10 

manning levels during fiscal year 2014; (3) Prohibit the 

Secretary of the Air Force from retiring or planning to retire 

A-10 aircraft (except for A-10s planned for retirement on or 

before April 9, 2013) between October 1, 2014 and December 31, 

2014; and (4) Add a requirement that the Secretary of Defense 

provide a report on all high-altitude intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance systems that the Department of 

Defense is operating or plans to operate in the future. 

We intend that the prohibition on making additional A-10 

aircraft retirements before December 31, 2014, be to provide 

breathing space for Congress to conduct oversight and to 

consider what actions to take on any force structure changes the 

Air Force may propose in fiscal year 2015. 

MC-12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance 

aircraft (sec. 144)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 934) that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

develop and carry out a plan for the transfer of Air Force MC-12 

aircraft to the Army. The provision would also prohibit the 

Army from acquiring the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance 

and Surveillance System (EMARSS) in fiscal year 2014.

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that directs the Secretary of Defense to develop a 

plan for the potential transfer of MC-12 Liberty aircraft from 

the Air Force to the Army. In addition, the provision prohibits 

the Army from using fiscal year 2014 funds to procure additional 

aircraft under the EMARSS program, but does allow the Army to 

use fiscal year 2014 funds to complete conversion efforts of 

existing aircraft that have already been procured, and to 

convert transferred Liberty aircraft to the EMARSS 

configuration. 
9

Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers 

(sec. 145)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 134) that would 

require the Secretary of the Air Force to develop and implement 

a plan to ensure the fair evaluation of competing contractors in 

awarding a contract to a certified evolved expendable launch

vehicle provider. This plan would include descriptions

of how the following areas would be addressed in the evaluation:

the proposed cost, schedule, and performance; mission assurance

activities; the manner in which the contractor will operate

under the Federal Acquisition Regulation; the effect of other 

contracts in which the contractor is entered into with the 

Federal Government, such as the Evolved Expendable Launch 

Vehicle (EELV) launch capability and the space station 

commercial resupply services contracts; and any other areas 

determined appropriate by the Secretary.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that requires the plan at the same time that the 

Secretary issues a draft request for proposals for a contract on 

the EELV with respect to how the Secretary will conduct 

competition in awarding the contract in addition to the specific 

areas listed in the original House bill.

We note that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) is 

conducting ongoing work regarding the EELV competition. We 

request that GAO conduct a review of the Air Force EELV 

acquisition strategy, which should include an assessment of the 

methodology, potential challenges, gaps, and acquisition 

planning process of the Air Force for evaluating competitors, 

and that GAO brief the defense and intelligence committees on 

its review. We request that this briefing be provided before a 

draft request for proposal is released by the Air Force. 

This legislative provision should not be construed as 

direction regarding ongoing procurement or any aspect of source 

selection criteria.

Reports on personal protection equipment and health and safety 

risks associated with ejection seats (sec. 146)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 146) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to enter into a contract with a 

federally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) to 

conduct a study to identify and assess alternative and effective 

means for stimulating competition and innovation in the personal 
10

protection equipment industrial base.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 

that would also require the Secretary of the Air Force to 

conduct a study to assess the safety of ejection seats currently 

in operational use by the Air Force.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Modification of requirements to sustain Navy airborne 

intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 124) that would amend section 112 of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111-383) to require the Secretary of the Navy to maintain 

sufficient numbers of EP-3 Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated 

Electronic System II (ARIES II) Spiral 3 aircraft and Special 

Projects Aircraft (SPA) version P909 to support the wartime 

operational plans of U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM), and to 

maintain the capacity to support five EP-3s for allocation to 

the combatant commands under the Global Force Management 

Allocation Plan (GFMAP), until the Navy's multi-intelligence 

(Multi-INT) Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) System 

TRITON aircraft with signals intelligence (SIGINT) capabilities 

reaches initial operational capability (IOC). The provision 

also would require the Secretary to upgrade the final (12th) EP3 ARIES II aircraft to the Spiral 3 configuration, and to 

correct electronic intelligence (ELINT) obsolescence problems on 

both the EP-3 and the SPA aircraft. Finally, the provision 

would require the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight 

Council (JROC) to coordinate with the Commanders of PACOM and 

the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) to determine 

requirements for the special capabilities provided by the SPA 

aircraft, and would require the Secretary to sustain sufficient 

numbers of SPA aircraft to meet those requirements until the 

Navy achieves IOC of a system with capabilities greater than or 

equal to the SPA. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Section 112 of Public Law 111-383 is intended to prevent a 

capacity decline in capabilities as the Navy developed 

replacements for the EP-3 and the SPA intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems. The Navy budget 

request, which is counter to congressional intent, creates a 
11

plan for transitioning from the EP-3/SPA systems to the TRITON 

Multi-INT and P-8 Quick Reaction Capability (QRC) that would 

result in a capacity decline beginning in fiscal year 2015. 

The Navy also informed Congress that the JROC supports the 

Navy’s transition plan, but in fact the JROC Memorandum (JROCM) 

on this issue expresses concern about the Navy’s plan and 

requires numerous follow-up actions. In addition, the JROCM 

instructs the Navy to develop requirements for the Multi-INT 

TRITON prior to the program’s next acquisition milestone review. 

Congressional review of the TRITON Capabilities Development 

Document confirms that a robust SIGNIT capability is documented 

only as a “potential future capability,” and not a validated 

requirement as implied by Navy officials to Congress. 

The Navy also proposes to prematurely remove highly-skilled 

personnel from the EP-3/SPA programs, resulting in a reduction 

of the number of available aircraft to support GFMAP and wartime 

requirements. Congress is concerned that harvesting these 

personnel to support an early version of TRITON that provides 

only optical and radar sensing, but little or no SIGINT 

capability, does not maximize utilization of highly-skilled 

personnel with perishable skill sets. Furthermore, the lack of 

a validated requirement for a robust SIGINT capability for 

TRITON raises concerns that the capacity and capability decline 

will turn out to be a permanent ISR capability loss.

We have serious concerns about the Navy’s non-compliant EP3/SPA to P-8 QRC/TRITON Multi-INT transition plan. Therefore, 

we direct that: 

(1) The JROC review and report to Congress the 

combatant commander requirements for the simultaneous ISR 

collection capability provided by EP-3/SPA assets under 

current Operational Plans and for the GFMAP; 

(2) The Joint Staff and the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Intelligence (USDI) identify and report to Congress 

alternative EP-3/SPA to P-8 QRC/TRITON Multi-INT transition 

options that do not result in a capacity decline or 

capability gap, including such options as using Navy 

reserve personnel to stand up the baseline TRITON system; 

(3) The JROC collaborate with the Navy to develop and 

document a formal requirement for TRITON Multi-INT; 

(4) The USDI develop, and report to Congress, a 

mitigation plan to address the ELINT obsolescence issues 

identified in the Senate report accompanying S. 1197 (S. 

Rept. 113-44) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2014; and, 

(5) The JROC and USDI to determine, and report to 

Congress, the force structure quantity and type of 

federated ISR systems and sensors required to wholly 
12

replace the EP-3/SPA force structure of aircraft to meet or 

exceed the current capacity and diversity of ISR collection 

capability inherently resident on the EP-3/SPA aircraft.

Multiyear procurement authority for Ground-Based Interceptors 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 141) that would 

provide multi-year procurement authority and advance procurement 

authority to the Director of the Missile Defense Agency for the 

procurement of 14 Ground-Based Interceptors.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Sense of Senate on the United States helicopter industrial base

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 152) that would express the sense of Senate on the health 

of the helicopter industrial base.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

TITLE II–RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND 

EVALUATION

Subtitle A–Authorization of Appropriations

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 201)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 201) authorizing 

appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the 

Department of Defense for research, development, test, and 

evaluation as specified in the funding table in section 4201.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 201).

The agreement includes this provision.

Subtitle B–Program Requirements, 

Restrictions, and Limitations

Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for the 

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (sec. 211)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 212) that would modify the biennial strategic plan 
13

requirement for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency 

(DARPA) to make more explicit the linkages between the strategic 

objections of the agency with the missions of the armed forces. 

Additionally, the provision would reassign responsibility for 

submission of the plan from the Secretary of Defense to the 

Director of DARPA, in coordination with the Under Secretary of 

Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

We recognize the value that DARPA brings to the Department 

of Defense, especially in terms of high risk research that can 

be potentially game changing. We believe that such research has 

the highest probability of successful transition when it is 

linked early with the operational defense community. 

For example, DARPA’s Phoenix program has the potential to 

change radically how the United States approaches space systems 

development and servicing. As the only program looking at 

satellite servicing and advanced robotics for geosynchronous 

earth orbit systems, this program has significant national 

security, civil, and as well as, commercial potential. However, 

we note that the development of such capabilities may raise 

complex policy issues, as well as pose as a disruptive 

technology to established approaches and operations. We 

encourage DARPA to not only continue its technical leadership in 

this field, but to also work with other entities in the 

Department of Defense – such as the Air Force, the National 

Reconnaissance Office, and the Under Secretaries of Defense for 

Policy and Intelligence - to ensure the development of 

operational concepts for this capability.

Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle 

engineering and manufacturing phase (sec. 212)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 211) that would 

prohibit the Army from obligating post-Milestone B funds for the 

Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) program until the Secretary of the 

Army submits a report to the congressional defense committees.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with technical and 

clarifying amendments.

Additionally, the Comptroller General of the United States 

is directed to submit to the congressional defense committees a 

report setting forth an assessment by the Comptroller General of 

the study of the Army on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle industrial 

base submitted to Congress pursuant to the Conference Report to 

accompany H.R. 4310 (112th Congress), the National Defense 
14

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (House Report 112-705). 

The report required shall include an assessment of the 

reasonableness of the study's methods including, but not limited 

to, the sufficiency, validity, and reliability of the data used 

to conduct the study, and include findings and recommendations, 

if any, on the combat vehicle industrial base. In conducting 

this review the Comptroller General should not replicate the 

Army study.

Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned carrierlaunched surveillance and strike system program (sec. 213)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 212) that would 

prohibit the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics from approving a Milestone

A technology development contract award for the Unmanned 

Carrier-Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike (UCLASS) 

program until 30 days after the Under Secretary certifies to the 

congressional defense committees that the software and system 

engineering designs for the control system and connectivity 

segment and the aircraft carrier segment of the UCLASS system 

can achieve, at a low level of integration risk, successful 

compatibility and operability with the air vehicle segment 

planned for selection at Milestone A contract award.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would modify the language to require that: (1) 

The Navy to limit the number of air vehicle segments acquired 

prior to receiving Milestone B approval for UCLASS; (2) The Navy 

provide periodic reports on cost, schedule and requirements 

changes for UCLASS; and (3) The Comptroller General conduct 

annual reviews of the UCLASS program.

Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics 

transformation (sec. 214)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 213) that would 

restrict the obligation and expenditure of Air Force procurement 

and research, development, test, and evaluation funds for 

logistics information technology programs until 30 days after 

the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the modernization 

and update of Air Force logistics information technology systems 

following the cancellation of the expeditionary combat support 

system.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 
15

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment.

Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace 

operations of the Air Force (sec. 215)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 214) that would 

limit the funds the Air Force may obligate or expend for 

Defensive Cyberspace Operations in PE 0202088F to not more than 

90 percent until a period of 30 days after the date on which the 

Secretary of the Air Force submits a report to the congressional 

defense committees detailing the Air Force's plan for 

sustainment of the Application Software Assurance Center of 

Excellence (ASACOE) across the Future Years Defense Program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision but included elsewhere in the committee-reported bill 

is $10.0 million in PE 33140F for sustainment of the ASACOE. 

The agreement includes this provision.

Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range 

munition program (sec. 216)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 215) that would 

limit funds for the precision extended range munition program 

until the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics provides the congressional defense 

committees with certain written certifications and a sufficient 

business case analysis.

The Senate committee-report bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on 

availability of funds for noncompetitive procedures for 

offensive anti-surface warfare weapon contracts of the Navy 

(sec. 217)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 218) that would 

require the Secretary of the Air Force to develop a follow-on 

air-launched cruise missile, Long Range Stand Off (LRSO) weapon 

to the AGM–86 that achieves initial operating capability for 

both conventional and nuclear missions by not later than 2030 

and is certified for internal carriage and employment for both 

conventional and nuclear missions on the next-generation longrange strike bomber by not later than 2034.
16

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that requires the LRSO to achieve initial operating 

capability for conventional missions prior to the retirement of 

the AGM-86, for nuclear missions prior to the retirement of the 

nuclear armed AGM-86 and is capable of internal carriage and 

employment for both missions in the long-range strike bomber. 

The amendment provides that the Secretary may carry out the 

consecutive development of the nuclear and conventional 

capabilities, with the nuclear capability first, if it is 

determined to be cost effective.

The amendment further includes a provision that would 

prohibit, during fiscal year 2014, using available funds to 

contract for Navy offensive anti-surface warfare weapons using 

other than through competitive procedures. Development, 

testing, and fielding of aircraft-launched offensive antisurface warfare weapons would be exempted from that prohibition. 

Included in the provision is a waiver of the prohibition by the 

Secretary of Defense if the Secretary determines that waiving 

this prohibition is in the national security interests of the 

United States.

Review of software development for F–35 aircraft (sec. 218)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 219) that would 

require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) to establish an 

independent team consisting of subject matter experts to review 

the development of software for the F–35 aircraft program and to 

report on the results of that review. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the USD(AT&L) to provide a plan for 

the sustainment of the Autonomic Logistics Information System 

for the F-35 aircraft.

Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common ground 

system (sec. 219)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 220) that would 

require that: (1) Beginning with the budget request for fiscal 

year 2015, future budget submissions include separate project 

codes for each capability component within each program element 

for each service version of the Distributed Common Ground System 

(DCGS); (2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
17

Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) conduct an analysis of 

commercial link analysis tools that could be used to meet the 

requirements of each of the service versions of the DCGS; and 

(3) If one or more commercial link analysis tools were found to 

meet the requirements of the program, the responsible service 

secretary would be required to initiate a request for proposals 

to purchase those tools.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would include the requirement that: (1) The 

services’ budget submissions include separate project codes for 

each capability component within each program element for each 

service version of the DCGS; and (2) The USD(AT&L) conduct an 

analysis of capability components of DCGS that are compliant 

with the intelligence community data standards and could be used 

to meet the requirements of the DCGS program. The provision 

would require the USD(AT&L) to submit a report of that analysis 

within 180 days of enactment of this Act. We expect that the 

USD(AT&L) will adjust the acquisition plans for DCGS if his 

analysis of the competitive acquisition options for capability 

components within DCGS shows that expanded competition shows 

promise. 

Operationally responsive space (sec. 220)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 225) that would 

prohibit expending more than 50 percent of the funds authorized 

or expended for the space-based infrared system modernization 

initiative wide field of view test bed until the Executive Agent 

for Space certifies to the congressional defense committees that 

the Secretary of Defense is carrying out the Operationally 

Responsive Space program office in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 

2273a.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes an amendment requiring a report no 

later than 60 days from the date of enactment regarding a 

potential mission that would seek to leverage all the policy 

objectives of the Operationally Responsive Space Program in a 

single mission.

Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities (sec. 221)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision

(sec. 216) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to 
18

procure the currently deployed Blue Devil intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) system or to develop a 

plan to replace that system with a comparable or improved 

system.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to 

develop a plan to sustain the operational capabilities of the 

Blue Devil I ISR Systems, including precision signal 

geolocation, by procuring the existing Blue Devil I aircraft, 

developing a new system, or adapting and integrating 

capabilities from existing and development programs. The 

Secretary is required to submit a report that addresses the cost 

of procuring, operating, and sustaining Blue Devil I aircraft 

system; the ability of other platforms to provide similar 

intelligence capabilities; and a listing of related U.S. Air 

Force and Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency (DARPA) 

programs. The report should be coordinated with the Commander 

of U.S. Special Operations Command and the Director of DARPA.

We agree that the necessary capability to sustain is both 

wide-area motion imagery combined with precision signal 

geolocation. The integration of these two capabilities provides 

significant operational utility. 

Subtitle C–Missile Defense Programs

Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic 

missile defense system (sec. 231)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 234) that would 

require the Director of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to make 

certain improvements to the cost estimates included in its 

annual acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic 

missile defense system (BMDS), and to provide a report on the 

plans and schedule for making such improvements.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would clarify that 

each cost estimate shall include all of the operation and 

sustainment (O&S) costs for which the Director is responsible, 

and also include a summary description of the O&S functions and 

costs for which the military departments are responsible, 

consistent with the Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum of 

June 10, 2011, on funding responsibilities for BMDS elements.

We note that, although the MDA is required to provide lifecycle cost estimates of its acquisition programs – including O&S 

costs – it does not include in those cost estimates the O&S 
19

costs for which the military departments that own and operate 

elements of the BMDS are responsible. As the Government 

Accountability Office has noted, this makes it difficult to 

understand the comprehensive life-cycle costs of BMDS elements. 

Therefore, we direct the Director of the MDA to work with the 

military departments that own or operate elements of the BMDS to 

make a recommendation for how those functions and related costs 

should be reported in either future annual BMDS Accountability 

Reports or other similar reports to Congress, including annual 

budget submission justification materials. We believe that the 

military departments should provide to the congressional defense 

committees the life-cycle cost estimates for the O&S functions 

of the BMDS elements for which they are responsible, and urge 

them to do so as soon as possible.

Furthermore, we expect the Director of the MDA to take steps to 

ensure that the cost estimate improvements required by the 

provision are made in a manner as consistent as practicable with 

the guidance issued pursuant to section 832 of Public Law 112-

81, relative to O&S costs, and with the guidance issued pursuant 

to section 2334(d) of title 10, United States Code, relative to 

confidence levels of baseline cost estimates.

Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program (sec. 232)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 231) that would 

prohibit the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2014 funds 

for the Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS), and would 

also place conditions on the harvesting of MEADS technology. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 236) that would prohibit the use of fiscal year 

2014 funds for MEADS.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

We note that the Department of Defense has invested more 

than $2.5 billion in the development of MEADS technology, and 

has a substantial interest in making constructive use of any 

MEADS data and technology owned by the United States. We direct 

the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional 

defense committees, not later than 180 days after the enactment 

of this Act, providing: (1) An explanation of who owns the 

technology and data developed under the tri-national MEADS 

development program; (2) How the Secretary intends to ensure 

that the Department gets the maximum benefit from the U.S. 

investment in MEADS, including by making such technology and 

data appropriately available for “technology harvesting” for 

improvements to the Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) 

system program of record, taking into account the report 

required by House Report 113-102, “Technology harvesting of the 
20

Medium Extended Air Defense System”; and (3) U.S. policy 

regarding 3rd Party Sales of such technology, which we believe 

could be of benefit to the United States and its allies.

Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of certain 

missile defense systems; report on regional ballistic missile 

defense (sec. 233)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 232) that would express the sense of Congress regarding 

regional ballistic missile defenses and would require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the status and progress of regional 

missile defense programs and efforts.

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would clarify the elements of the required 

report. It would also include a prohibition on the use of 

fiscal year 2014 funds to integrate missile defense systems of 

the People’s Republic of China into U.S. missile defense 

systems.

We are concerned that the Government of Turkey made an 

initial decision to purchase a Chinese air and missile defense 

system for its territorial use. Such a system would not be 

compatible with, and should not be integrated with, missile 

defense systems of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 

We direct that, not later than 60 days after submission of 

the report required by the provision, the Government 

Accountability Office shall provide a briefing to the 

congressional defense committees providing its views on the 

report.

We further direct that, not later than 90 days after the 

enactment of this Act, the Joint Staff and Joint Force Component 

Command for Integrated Missile Defense (JFCC-IMD) shall provide 

a briefing to the congressional defense committees with respect 

to any significant changes in the regional missile defense 

environment since the April 2011 Joint Capability Mix (JCM) III 

Study was completed, and whether and how the study could be 

updated to provide useful insights for future force structure 

levels and employment plans. The briefing should be based on 

updated intelligence information, updated missile defense 

systems efficacy and reliability information, and current and 

planned future budget levels, and any other matters the Joint 

Staff and JFCC-IMD consider useful.

Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome short-range 

rocket defense system in the United States (sec. 234)
21

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 237) that would 

authorize $15.0 million to enhance the capability for producing 

the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system in the United 

States.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would authorize up 

to $15.0 million for non-recurring engineering costs associated 

with establishing the capacity for United States industry to 

produce parts and components of the Iron Dome system in the 

United States, subject to an agreement between the United States 

and Israel for co-production of Iron Dome parts and components. 

The provision would also require the Director of the Missile 

Defense Agency to submit a report to Congress on the plan to 

implement such agreement, including the estimated costs, 

schedule, and steps to minimize costs to the government of the 

United States to implement the agreement. The provision would 

also clarify that it is not intended to alter the planned Iron 

Dome procurement schedule or numbers, and would express the 

sense of Congress on the importance of a second production 

source in the United States. The provision would also require 

the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the status of missile defense cooperation 

between the United States and Israel.

We believe it is important for industry to pay for a 

substantial share of the cost of establishing a co-production 

capacity in the United States. Further, we direct that the 

Missile Defense Agency not use funds from other programs of 

record to pay for establishing an Iron Dome production capacity 

in the United States.

Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the 

United States homeland (sec. 235)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 234) that would require the Missile Defense Agency to 

deploy an additional missile defense radar for homeland missile 

defense, and would authorize $30.0 million for initial costs 

toward such deployment.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Missile Defense Agency to deploy a missile defense radar at a 

location optimized to support defense of the homeland against 

long-range missile threats from North Korea, and would authorize 

$30.0 million for initial costs toward such deployment. The 

provision would also require the Secretary of Defense to ensure 
22

that the United States is able to deploy additional tracking and 

discrimination sensor capabilities to support defense of the 

United States from future long-range ballistic missile threats 

that emerge from Iran. The provision would require the 

Secretary to submit a report on what sensor capabilities will be 

available for deployment on the Atlantic side of the United 

States by 2019, or sooner if Iran flight tests long-range 

missiles before then, and the manner in which such capabilities 

will be maintained to ensure they can be deployed in time to 

support the missile defense of the United States from long-range 

ballistic missile threats from Iran. We note that the sea-based 

X-band radar platform and the Cobra Judy ship-based radar 

platform could serve as interim or surge sensor capabilities in 

the Atlantic region to support homeland defense against future 

long-range missile threats that emerge from Iran.

The agreement also authorizes an additional $50.0 million 

for the Missile Defense Agency to develop enhanced 

discrimination capability for the Ballistic Missile Defense 

System, as reflected in the tables in section 4201. The Missile 

Defense Agency and the missile defense operational community 

have identified such discrimination enhancement as a priority 

for improving the future effectiveness of missile defenses, 

particularly for homeland missile defense.

Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense 

sensor architectures (sec. 236)

The Senate committee-reported bill included a provision 

(sec. 235) that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

evaluate options for future ballistic missile defense sensor 

architectures and to report to the congressional defense 

committees the results of the evaluation.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would include consideration of options for 

maximizing the use of various sensors for missile defense and 

for other missions.

Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense system (sec. 

237)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 236) that would 

require the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the 

Commander of the U.S. Northern Command to develop options and a 

plan to improve the kill assessment capability and the hit 

assessment capability of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense 

(GMD) system, and to submit a report on the development of such 
23

capabilities.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would also require the Director of the Missile 

Defense Agency to submit a plan for the use of fiscal years 2013 

and 2014 funds to develop, test, and deploy an upgraded enhanced 

exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the GMD system.

If the report required by the provision is not submitted by 

April 1, 2014, we direct the Department of Defense to provide a 

briefing to the congressional defense committees on the subject 

matter required in the report not later than April 1, 2014.

The agreement authorizes $100.0 million for design and 

development of common kill vehicle technology for an upgraded 

enhanced exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the GMD system, an 

increase of $30.0 million above the budget request, to 

accelerate design and development efforts, as reflected in the 

tables in section 4201.

Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile defense 

options (sec. 238)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 231) that would express the sense of Congress concerning 

the importance of homeland ballistic missile defense against the 

threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and 

Iran, and would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a 

report on potential future options for enhancing homeland 

ballistic missile defense.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision requiring the 

report, with a clarifying amendment.

The agreement authorizes an additional $80.0 million for 

the Missile Defense Agency to continue efforts to understand the 

cause of the problem that resulted in the Ground-based Midcourse 

Defense system flight test failure on July 5, 2013, using the 

Capability Enhancement-I (CE-I) kill vehicle, and take the 

necessary steps to correct the problem and demonstrate the 

correction in an intercept flight test. 

The CE-I flight test failure occurred after the budget was 

submitted, and no funds were planned or budgeted to analyze and 

correct the problem, or to conduct another intercept flight test 

to demonstrate the correction of the problem. The Missile 

Defense Agency has stated that its highest priority is 

correcting the problems associated with the flight test failures 

of the CE-II and CE-I kill vehicles, and demonstrating the 

successful corrections through additional intercept flight 
24

tests.

We direct that, not later than 60 days after the submission 

of the report required by the provision, the Government 

Accountability Office provide a briefing to the congressional 

defense committees providing its views on the report.

Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile defense 

matters (sec. 239)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 232) that would 

require the Missile Defense Agency to construct and make 

operational in fiscal year 2018 an additional homeland missile 

defense site, designed to complement the existing sites in 

Alaska and California, to deal more effectively with missile 

threats from the Middle East.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to provide, not later than 180 days after 

the completion of the site evaluation study required by section 

227(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112-239), and 1 year later, a briefing to the 

congressional defense committees on the status of current 

efforts and plans to implement the requirements of section 227, 

including progress and plans toward preparation of the 

Environmental Impact Statement required by section 227(b), and 

the development of the contingency plan for the deployment of an 

additional homeland missile defense interceptor site, in case 

the President determines to proceed with such an additional 

deployment, as required by section 227(d).

The agreement authorizes an additional $20.0 million for 

the Missile Defense Agency to continue activities relative to 

the site evaluation study, the Environmental Impact Statement, 

and planning activities consistent with the requirements of 

section 227(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013, including the development of the contingency 

plan for the deployment of an additional homeland missile 

defense interceptor site. Such planning activities should 

include efforts to update the relevant planning documents from 

the deployment of missile fields at Fort Greely, Alaska, and 

plans for the possible deployment of a ground-based-interceptor 

site in Europe, to prepare for the potential deployment of an 

additional missile defense site in the continental United 

States, as well as such other preliminary planning activities as 

can practicably be commenced prior to site selection, or updated 

upon site selection.
25

Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense burdensharing (sec. 240)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 238) that would 

require the President to seek specific levels of funding from 

the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) for various phases 

of the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) to missile 

defense.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would express the 

sense of Congress concerning the increasing importance of 

burden-sharing among the NATO allies for missile defense, and 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees providing: (1) The estimated 

costs for the EPAA; (2) A description of the level of NATO 

burden-sharing for the costs of NATO missile defense, including 

the EPAA; and (3) An assessment of, and recommendations for, 

areas where the Secretary believes NATO and its members could 

make additional burden-sharing contributions to NATO missile 

defense, including the EPAA.

We note that, as declared at the 2010 Lisbon Summit, the 

United States and its NATO allies share a strong interest in 

developing and deploying an operationally-effective and costeffective missile defense capability to defend the territory, 

population, and military forces of NATO – including forward 

deployed United States forces – in Europe. The United States 

and its NATO partners are making a variety of contributions, 

both individually and collectively, to NATO missile defense, 

including through national contributions, host-nation basing 

agreements, and collective funding arrangements. The United 

States is contributing to the EPAA as its national contribution 

to NATO missile defense, and a number of NATO allies are 

providing important support for the EPAA, as well as other 

support for NATO missile defense. The cancellation of Phase 4 

of the EPAA eliminated the contribution that the EPAA would have 

made toward augmenting U.S. homeland missile defenses against 

potential Iranian intercontinental ballistic missiles. 

We believe that burden-sharing is an important NATO 

principle, and is important to the recently adopted NATO mission 

of missile defense of NATO territory, population, and military 

forces. Therefore, while recognizing the important support 

provided by a number of NATO allies for key aspects of the EPAA, 

we believe the U.S. Government should encourage other NATO 

members to provide additional support for NATO missile defense, 

including the EPAA, to ensure an appropriate level of burdensharing.
26

Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic missile 

defense capabilities (sec. 241)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 233) that would 

limit the use of funds to remove United States missile defense 

equipment in East Asia until after certain conditions are met.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would express the 

sense of Congress concerning the deployment of regional 

ballistic missile defense capabilities.

Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II 

exoatmospheric kill vehicle (sec. 242)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 239) that would 

express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense 

should not procure additional Capability Enhancement II (CE-II) 

exo-atmospheric kill vehicles for deployment until after the 

date on which a successful operational flight test of the CE-II 

has occurred.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Subtitle D–Reports

Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat 

vehicle acquisition program (sec. 251)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 251) that would 

require the Comptroller General to provide an annual report on 

the Marine Corps' amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the 

acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter (sec. 

252)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 251) that would require the Comptroller General to produce 

an annual report on the VXX presidential helicopter program 

until the program enters full-rate production or is cancelled, 
27

whichever comes first.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical/clarifying amendment.

Report on strategy to improve body armor (sec. 253)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 252) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional 

defense committees a comprehensive research and development 

strategy for achieving significant weight reductions for body 

armor components.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with a technical 

amendment.

Subtitle E–Other Matters

Establishment of Communications Security Review and Advisory 

Board (sec. 261)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 261) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to establish a senior-level 

body, to be known as the Cryptographic Modernization Review and 

Advisory Board, to assess and advise the cryptographic 

modernization activities of the Department of Defense.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Chief Information Officer to 

chair the Board, with the Board monitoring overall 

communications security, cryptographic modernization, and key 

management efforts of the Department.

Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for 

defense laboratories for research and development of 

technologies for military missions (sec. 262)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 263) that would 

extend section 219 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 

2009 (Public Law 110-417) to September 2020. In addition, this 

provision would allow for funds to be accumulated for not more 

than 5 years for individual Department of Defense laboratory 

revitalization projects with costs up to $4 million, provided 

prior notification of the total project cost is provided to the 

congressional defense committees.
28

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 215) that extended section 219 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act of 2009 (Public Law 110-417) to September 

2020.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that requires an annual report on the use of the 

authority granted by this provision, as well as some other 

clarifying elements.

Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology 

achievements (sec. 263)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 264) that would 

extend the authority of the Department of Defense to award 

prizes for advanced technology achievements until September 

2018.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 213) that would extend this authority until 

September 2017.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology 

protection features during research and development of certain 

defense systems (sec. 264)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 265) that would 

extend the Defense Exportability Features pilot program until 

October 1, 2020.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 214). 

The agreement includes this provision.

Briefing on biometrics of the Department of Defense (sec. 265)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 216) that would 

place limitations on the Department of Defense to obligate or 

expend more than 75 percent of funds for future biometric 

architectures or systems until 30 days after the Secretary of 

Defense submits a report to the congressional defense committees 

assessing the future program structure and architectural 

requirements for biometrics enabling capability.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would remove the funding limitation and request a 

briefing, including an assessment of the governance process for 

requirements across the Department of Defense, as well as 
29

interagency and international partners.

Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile 

compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the United 

Kingdom’s Vanguard successor program (sec. 266)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 223) that would 

make a series of findings and express the sense of Congress 

regarding the importance of aligning the common missile 

compartment of the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine

program with the Vanguard-class successor program of the United

Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 

that eliminates the findings contained in the House provision.

Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power microwave 

missile project (sec. 267)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 224) that 

expressed a sense of Congress urging the Air Force to consider 

the Counter-electronics High Power Microwave Advanced Missile 

Program (CHAMP) technology capability demonstration as a 

potential weapon option available to combatant commanders by 

2016.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment clarifying the need to complete developmental planning 

for such weapons systems if requirements are established by the 

combatant commanders in the future.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Conventional Prompt Global Strike program

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 211) that would prohibit the Department of Defense from 

executing any funds for the Conventional Prompt Global Strike 

(CPGS) program until 60 days after they deliver a report to the 

congressional defense committees addressing the policy 

consideration concerning the ambiguity problems regarding the 

launch of CPGS missiles from submarine platforms.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 
30

We agree that no more than 75 percent of the funds 

authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made 

available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense for 

research, development, test and evaluation and available for the 

Prompt Global Strike Capability Development program 

(PE#64165D8Z) for the CPGS program should be obligated or 

expended for any activities relating to the development of a 

submarine-launched capability under that program until 60 days 

after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the 

congressional defense committees a report that addresses the 

policy considerations concerning any potential ambiguity 

problems regarding the launch of a conventionally-armed missile 

from submarine platforms, potential verification measures, any 

target sets the Secretary believes a submarine-launched 

conventionally-armed missile could reach that a missile on board 

another platform could not reach, the comparative cost 

considerations of submarine-launched conventional missiles and 

such systems launched by other platforms.

We also note that in congressional testimony, the 

Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, stated that “[t]oday, the 

only prompt global strike capability to engage potentially timesensitive, fleeting targets continues to be ballistic missile 

systems armed with nuclear weapons. We continue to require a 

deployed conventional prompt strike capability to provide the 

President a range of flexible military options to address a 

small number of highest-value targets, including in an antiaccess and area denial environment.”

Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing requirement

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 217) that would 

require the Secretary of the Navy to demonstrate unmanned, 

autonomous aerial refueling within the X–47B aircraft testing 

and evaluation program. The X-47B is an unmanned aircraft being 

tested under the Unmanned Combat Air System (UCAS) demonstration 

program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We understand that the Chief of Naval Operations has 

decided that, unlike the original Navy plan, the Navy will 

continue flying the X-47B during fiscal year 2014, and will 

pursue a number of risk reduction activities. We support these 

Navy plans for continuing risk reduction activities for UCAS, 

and encourage the Navy to consider performing the aerial 

refueling demonstration as part of these additional risk 

reduction activities.
31

Requirement to complete individual carbine testing

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 221) that would 

require the Department of the Army to complete planned testing 

for an individual carbine.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain this provision.

We understand that during the Army’s testing of eight 

candidate carbines under the individual carbine program that 

none of the carbines met the Army’s target for improved 

reliability requirements. We further understand that these 

results may be attributable to the interactions between the 

carbines and the recently introduced M855A1 standard 5.56mm 

rounds that were used during the test and evaluation. These 

test results suggest the Army may have used an unrealistically 

high reliability standard.

Accordingly, we urge the Army to re-evaluate the 

reliability standard used for this test, as well as other 

standards as appropriate. We encourage the Secretary of the 

Army to consider a process for continuous test and evaluation of 

alternatives to the M4A1 carbine that is based on realistic 

operational requirements and with significantly improved, but 

reasonably achievable, performance and reliability. We note 

that, while the Army may have reduced needs and limited funds to 

procure large numbers of new rifles or carbines in the near 

future, maintaining research and development efforts for new 

small arms in this class is essential to ensure that the 

industrial base can respond to sudden increases in demand as it 

did during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring 

Freedom. In this regard, the Secretary of the Army, or 

designee, is directed to provide the congressional defense 

committees a briefing that details the Army's long range 

standard rifle and carbine modernization strategy. This 

briefing shall be provided not later than April 1, 2014, and 

shall include the Army's plans, including where appropriate, 

schedules and funding profiles, for requirements development, 

technology research and development, procurement, and test and 

evaluation of commercially available and militarily suitable 

alternatives.

Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for a Navy laser 

weapon system 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 222) that would 

establish a funding line and fielding plan for a Navy laser 
32

weapon system for fiscal year 2018 and beyond.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision.

We are supportive of accelerating the development and 

transition of directed energy weapons to programs of record, in 

the Navy as well as the other military departments. However, we 

believe that it is premature to create such a funding line. We 

also note that many of the current activities supporting 

development of directed energy weapons are already embedded in 

existing research and development program elements, and 

therefore the creation of a consolidated funding line at this 

stage could be disruptive to those efforts and potentially 

detrimental to overall efforts to develop and field a 

militarily-relevant system.

Analysis of alternatives for successor to Precision Tracking 

Space System

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 235) that would 

require the Director of the Missile Defense Agency to perform an 

analysis of alternatives for a successor sensor system to the 

Precision Tracking Space System.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic Defense 

Initiative

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 240) that would 

express the sense of Congress concerning the 30th anniversary of 

the Strategic Defense Initiative.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Sense of Congress on negotiations affecting the missile defenses 

of the United States

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 242) that would 

express the sense of Congress concerning negotiations with the 

Russian Federation that would affect the missile defenses of the 

United States.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.
33

Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 253) that would 

require the Secretary of the Army to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees on an investment strategy to 

accelerate fuel efficiency improvements to the engine and 

transmission of the M1 Abrams tank.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the Army and Marine Corps currently have no 

plan to replace the M1A2 or M1A1 Abrams main battle tank. We 

are also aware that the Army intends to proceed with a series of 

engineering change proposals that will incrementally enhance the 

platform’s capabilities. We believe that the Army should 

accelerate the next series of Abrams upgrades where warranted by 

capability gaps or opportunities, technological maturity, and 

affordability. In this regard, the Army and Marine Corps should 

consider replacement of the current engine with a modern, fuel 

efficient power train. Therefore, the Secretary of the Army, in 

consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, is directed to 

submit a report to the congressional defense committees, not 

later than June 1, 2014, on a business case analysis and an 

investment strategy that could accelerate the technology 

development and engineering change proposal processes to include 

a modern fuel efficient engine and transmission for the M1 

Abrams series main battle tank.

Report on powered rail system

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 254) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the 

congressional defense committees that comprehensively reviews 

and compares powered rail systems for the M4 Carbine system.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

The Secretary of the Army, or designee, is directed to 

provide a report to the congressional defense committees not 

later than April 1, 2014 on an assessment of the current M4/M16-

mounted battery requirements associated with a 3-day dismounted 

mission for an Army infantry platoon compared to the same unit 

and mission if the members were equipped with an integrated 

weapon-mounted power source. The assessment should compare the 

battery requirements, numbers, weight, costs, as well as the 

likely impact on the operational functionality of the M4/M16 
34

configured with an integrated power source, including weapons 

system effectiveness, efficiency, ergonomics, maintainability, 

reliability, and related risk. The assessment should also 

include a business case analysis of the potential acquisition 

and sustainment costs and savings associated with transitioning 

to an integrated M4/M16-mounted power technology to replace 

batteries for individual weapon-mounted components. Finally, 

the assessment should address the potential utility, if any, of 

incorporating a data link via such a weapon-mounted power source 

between soldier communications systems and soldier and weapon 

sensors. The Director, Operational Test and Evaluation is also 

directed to oversee the Army's live fire or other operational 

testing, if any, conducted as part of gathering data for this 

report.

Report on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 

scholarship program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 255) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to assess whether the 

Department of Defense Science, Mathematics and Research for 

Transformation (SMART) scholarship program, or similar programs, 

could meet the undergraduate and graduate science, technology, 

engineering and mathematics (STEM) workforce needs of the 

intelligence community (IC).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

We note that the national security community, in general, 

faces growing challenges with meeting its STEM workforce needs, 

in particular, attracting top-level U.S. citizens that are 

eligible for security clearances. The SMART program was 

established by the Department of Defense to attract and retain 

promising candidates and STEM leaders into the Department, 

including components of the IC. SMART provides scholarships to 

students pursuing technical degrees in disciplines of interest 

to the Department and the IC. We recognize that the SMART 

program has been useful in meeting its intent and believe that 

data provided on the program shows that the SMART program could 

be used by a broader community within the IC, but any further 

expansion would require further socialization to increase 

participation, as well as additional resources to fund any 

additional students supporting the needs of the IC.

Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate in 

defense experimental program to stimulate competitive research 
35

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 262) that would 

modify the eligibility requirements for the Defense Experimental 

Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (DEPSCOR) to bring it 

more in line with the eligibility requirements of the 

Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCOR) 

under the National Science Foundation (NSF).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that while the Department of Defense maintains the 

statutory authority for DEPSCOR, the Department has not included 

funds to support the program since 2009 due to changing research 

needs and priorities. Additionally, even should funds be made 

available for DEPSCOR in the future, we would be concerned about 

potential duplication with NSF’s EPSCOR. DEPSCOR was originally 

established as a separate activity from EPSCOR in section 257 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 1995 

(Public Law 103-337) because the needs of the Department were 

not being met by the EPSCOR. Should the Department choose to 

revitalize the DEPSCOR activity, we believe it should maintain a 

separate and distinct eligibility requirement to ensure that it 

is able to meet the separate and distinct research needs of the 

Department of Defense.

Briefing on power and energy research conducted at universityaffiliated research centers 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 266) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to brief the congressional 

defense authorizing committees on power and energy research 

conducted at university-affiliated research centers.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Approval of certain new uses of research, development, test, and 

evaluation land 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 267) that would 

prohibit the Secretary of Defense or the head of any other 

department or agency of the Federal Government from finalizing 

any decision regarding new land use activity on ranges, test 

areas, or other land used by the Department of Defense (DOD) for 

activities related to research, development, test, and 

evaluation and determined to be critical to national security 

unless the secretary concerned approves such activity in 

writing.
36

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the DOD Siting Clearinghouse was created to 

preserve military readiness and protect DOD capabilities from 

incompatible energy infrastructure development by collaborating 

with DOD components and external stakeholders to prevent, 

minimize, or mitigate adverse impacts on military operations, 

readiness, and testing. The Clearinghouse is intended to be the 

single point of contact and principal advocate for DOD equities 

in all such deliberations. 

We understand that as a result of the Clearinghouse review 

of the Sun Zia Southwest Transmission Project, DOD raised 

significant concerns and identified potential impacts on the 

capabilities of the White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) in New 

Mexico. According to an August 7, 2013, letter from the Acting 

Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and 

Environment to the Principal Deputy Director of the Bureau of 

Land Management (BLM), the route of the proposed transmission 

line, without mitigation, “would result in an unacceptable risk 

to national security. If a bulk power transmission line is 

constructed along the selected route, it would preclude our 

capability to fully test the Joint Integrated Air and Missile 

Defense Architecture and other weapon systems under realistic 

threat environments at WSMR. This testing is absolutely 

necessary and it should be clearly understood that no other 

location exists in the United States where it is possible to 

conduct flight tests with the footprint requirements these 

weapons systems present. Critical to fully testing joint 

military weapons are the preservation of the restricted airspace 

(from the surface to unlimited) on the range area on WSMR, and 

the permanently-designated and specially-allocated restricted 

airspace in the northern extension area.”

We expect that as the Sun Zia Southwest Transmission 

project approval request proceeds, DOD concerns will be 

addressed by the executive branch to preserve this critical 

resource. We expect that appropriate mitigation measures will 

be included concurrent to the issuance of a Record of Decision 

by BLM.

Should DOD concerns not be addressed in this case, we 

direct the Secretary of Defense to review the processes and 

effectiveness of the DOD Siting Clearinghouse and to provide a 

report to the congressional defense committees not later than 90 

days after a Record of Decision with proposals that will improve 

the ability of the Clearinghouse to assess impacts to national 

security in a timely manner and ultimately preserve military 

readiness and protect DOD capabilities from incompatible energy 
37

infrastructure development.

Canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive 

precursors

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 268) that would 

require the Department of Defense (DOD) to provide a report on 

the capability and infrastructure required to support canines as 

stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We direct the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives no later than 180 days after the date of 

enactment of this Act. The report shall make a determination 

based on requirements if the DOD, and each military service, 

intends to develop and maintain the capability and 

infrastructure required to support canines as stand-off 

detection of explosives and explosive precursors. If deemed 

appropriate by the Secretary, the report shall also detail: (1) 

The acquisition process with respect to canines as stand-off 

detection of explosives and explosive precursors; (2) The 

procedures established by the DOD to ensure that canines reach 

or exceed the appropriate performance standards; (3) A plan to 

ensure that the latest data and information regarding canine 

capabilities are distributed throughout the DOD; (4) Any 

technologies capable of replacing the canine as a stand-off 

detection capability; and (5) A determination of the relevant 

office to oversee the above elements.

TITLE III–OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Subtitle A–Authorization of Appropriations

Operation and maintenance funding (sec. 301)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 301) authorizing 

appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the armed 

forces and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, 

not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as 

specified in the funding table in section 4301.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 301).

The agreement includes this provision.
38

Subtitle B-Energy and Environment

Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for 

activities relating to operational energy strategy (sec. 311)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 311) that would 

amend section 138c(e) of title 10, United States Code, to revise 

the date of submission for the report on the proposed budgets 

that were not certified for that fiscal year.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs

of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to 

avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities 

(sec. 312)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 312) that would 

amend section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, to permit a 

recipient of funds under the Sikes Act to be able to use the 

funds for matching funds or cost-sharing requirements of 

conservation programs. This section would also expire the 

authority on October 1, 2019, but permit any agreements that 

were entered into prior to September 30, 2019, to continue 

according to its terms and conditions.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Reauthorization of Sikes Act (sec. 313)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 313) that would 

extend the authority of the Sikes Act through 2019. 

The Senate committee-reported bill amendment contained no 

similar provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air 

burn pits (sec. 314)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 317) that would 

codify the definition of covered waste as it relates to the 

requirements established by section 317 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, title 10 of United 

States Code 2701 note (Public Law 111-84). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 
39

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment.

Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in 

fuels (sec. 315)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 319) that would 

limit the Department of Defense’s (DOD) ability to purchase or 

produce biofuels until the earlier of either the date on which 

the Budget Control Act of 2011 is no longer in effect, or the 

date on which the cost of biofuel is equal to the cost of 

conventional fuels. The provision would provide an exception 

for biofuel test and certification and research and development.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment that would prohibit DOD funds to be used 

for bulk purchases of drop-in fuel for operational purposes 

during fiscal year 2014, unless the cost of that drop-in fuel is 

cost competitive with traditional fuel, subject to a national 

security waiver. We note that the phrase “cost competitive” in 

this section generally refers to prices that are equal to or 

lower than prices offered by competitors for similar goods or 

services. However, we note that terms and conditions for 

particular purchases may vary; in particular, long-term energy 

purchases are likely to have different pricing structures from 

short-term or spot-market purchases. Accordingly, some 

flexibility in the application of this phrase is anticipated, 

where necessary to address such differences. We understand that 

average prices over the period of a long-term contract would be 

cost competitive.

Subtitle C-Logistics and Sustainment

Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment (sec. 

321)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 312) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to develop 

an overarching strategy, along with an implementation plan, to 

integrate and synchronize at a Department-wide level, the 

services’ prepositioning programs. The strategy and 

implementation plan would ensure that the Department of Defense 

(DOD) prepositioning programs, both ground and afloat, align 

with national defense strategies and new DOD priorities, and 

emphasize joint oversight to maximize effectiveness and 
40

efficiencies in prepositioned materiel and equipment across the 

DOD.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and report 

(sec. 322)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 322) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to review current and expected 

manufacturing requirements across the Department of Defense to 

identify critical manufacturing capabilities which could be 

executed by the government-owned arsenals, and to brief the 

results of the review to the congressional defense committees.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 311) that would require the Secretary of 

Defense, in consultation with the military services and defense 

agencies, to review current and expected manufacturing 

requirements for which there is no or limited domestic 

commercial source and which are appropriate for manufacturing 

within an arsenal owned by the United States in order to support 

critical manufacturing capabilities.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to review 

arsenals owned by the United States in order to support critical 

manufacturing capabilities. The agreement also directs the 

Government Accountability Office to report and assess the 

Department’s review with recommendations.

Consideration of Army arsenals’ capabilities to fulfill 

manufacturing requirements (sec. 323)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 323) that would 

require program executive officers and program managers to 

solicit information from government-owned arsenals when 

undertaking a make-or-buy analysis, notify government-owned 

arsenals of the requirement, and allow arsenals that have the 

capability to fulfill a manufacturing requirement to submit a 

proposal for the requirement.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and 

replacement of operating forces used to support overseas 

contingency operations (sec. 324)
41

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 322) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to 

establish a policy setting forth the program and priorities of 

the Department of Defense for the retrograde, reconstitution, 

and replacement of units and materiel used to support overseas 

contingency operations. The provision directed that the policy 

shall take into account national security threats, the 

requirements of the combatant commands, the current readiness of 

the operational forces of the military departments, and risk 

associated with strategic depth and the time necessary to 

reestablish required personnel, equipment, and training 

readiness in such operating forces.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical amendment.

Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan (sec. 325)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 321) that would 

require the Secretary of the Navy to submit a strategic 

sustainment plan for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program to 

the congressional defense committees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would clarify that the strategic sustainment plan 

would have to identify specifically any contractor support 

needed by the LCS vessels when they are forward deployed.

Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility 

(sec. 326)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 836) that would 

direct the Secretary of Defense to improve the management of 

defense equipment and supplies throughout their lifecycles by 

adopting and implementing item unique identification, radio 

frequency identification, biometrics, and other automated 

information and data capture technologies for the tracking, 

management, and accountability for deployed assets.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 331) that would direct the Secretary of Defense 

to complete a comprehensive strategy and implementation plan for 

improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility across the 

Department of Defense.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment that would include an operational security 
42

assessment to ensure all DOD assets are appropriately protected 

during the execution of the comprehensive strategy and 

implementation plan.

We recognize the challenges in supply chain management, 

including asset tracking and in-transit visibility capabilities. 

We see this posing an acute near-term challenge, especially in 

light of the experience with retrograde operations from the 

Republic of Iraq and the on-going operations in the Islamic 

Republic of Afghanistan.

Furthermore, we note that supply chain management 

challenges have been an on-going source of concern for the 

Department of Defense, from the emergence of the Government 

Accountability Office’s high risk list in 1990, to the current 

need to achieve auditability and financial management goals set 

by the Secretary of Defense and Congress.

We believe that the strategy called for by this provision 

is an important step to improving the Department’s supply chain 

management shortfalls. In developing and implementing this 

strategy, we urge the Department to look at how it can better 

leverage new technologies. For example, item unique 

identification, radio frequency identification, and biometrics 

could be more effectively used to interface with enterprise 

resource planning systems and improve the tracking, management, 

and accountability for all Department assets.

Subtitle D-Reports

Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit 

readiness (sec. 331)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 331) that would 

amend the report required under section 482 of title 10, United 

States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to report to 

the congressional defense committees on the ability of the 

geographic and functional combatant commanders to successfully 

meet their respective contingency and operational plans and key 

mission essential tasks.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 332) that would amend section 482 of title 10, 

United States Code, to update and streamline the quarterly 

readiness report to Congress. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment that would combine both provisions and 

would amend section 482 of title 10, United States Code.

Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for 

equipment readiness and strategic capability (sec. 332)
43

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 332) that would 

repeal the requirement that the Comptroller General of the 

United States report on the Army’s progress in moving to a 

modular force design.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 321) that would repeal the requirement for 

modularity reports by both the Army and the Government 

Accountability Office and would also add a requirement that the 

Marine Corps report budget information regarding funding for the 

reset of equipment and reconstitution of prepositioned stocks.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Revision to requirement for annual submission of information 

regarding information technology capital assets (sec. 333)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 333) that would 

amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2003 (Public Law 107-314; 10 U.S.C. 221 note) to align 

Department of Defense high-threshold information technology 

Capital Asset reporting with the Department’s Major Automated 

Information Systems reporting and its Exhibit 300 reporting to 

the Office of Management and Budget.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 333). 

The agreement includes this provision.

Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention 

reporting requirements (sec. 334)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 334) that would amend section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan 

Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 

(P.L. 110-417; 10 U.S.C. 2228 note) to update the military 

departments’ strategic plans with performance measures and show 

clear linkage to the Department of Defense’s overarching goals 

and objectives as described in the Department’s strategic plan 

for corrosion control and prevention.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Subtitle E-Limitations and Extensions of 

Authority

Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air Force Base, 

Azores (sec. 341)
44

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 341) that would 

restrict the Secretary of the Air Force from reducing the force 

structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, (Lajes) until 30 days 

after the European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment is 

completed and is briefed to the congressional defense 

committees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contains no similar 

provision. 

The agreement includes a provision requiring that, prior to 

taking any action to realign forces at Lajes, the Secretary of 

Defense must certify to the congressional defense committees 

that the realignment is supported by a European Infrastructure 

Consolidation Assessment.

Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight 

demonstration teams outside the United States (sec. 342)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 342) that would 

prohibit the Secretary of Defense from using any fiscal year 

2014 or 2015 funds to allow flight demonstration teams to 

perform at any location outside the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. The Senate report accompanying S. 1197 (S. Rpt. 113-

44) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2014 commented on Department of Defense (DOD) guidance 

prohibiting all aerial demonstrations, including flyovers, jump 

team demonstrations, and participation in civilian air shows and 

military open houses. The report observed that: (1) There may 

be certain circumstances where an exception to this general 

policy could provide some level of community engagement as a nocost addition to activities that are required for training or 

readiness; and (2) DOD should reconsider whether this policy 

should be enforced on a blanket basis or whether the policy 

should allow for community engagement if that engagement can be 

completed as a no-cost adjunct to missions fulfilling other 

required operational or training activities.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would prohibit spending funds for performances of 

flight demonstration teams outside the United States if the 

Department has cancelled any performances of flight 

demonstration teams inside the United States by reason of 

insufficient funds due to a sequestration. We are intending 

that this provision cover the Air Force Thunderbirds, the Navy 

Blue Angels and the Army Golden Knights.

Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations 
45

Command National Capital Region (sec. 343)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 341) that would prohibit the expenditure of any funds for 

the U.S. Special Operations Command National Capital Region 

(USSOCOM-NCR) until 30 days after the Secretary of Defense 

provides the congressional defense committees a report which 

describes, at a minimum: (1) The purpose of the USSOCOM-NCR; (2) 

The activities to be performed by the USSOCOM–NCR; (3) An 

explanation of the impact of the USSOCOM-NCR on existing 

activities at USSOCOM headquarters; (4) A detailed breakout, by 

fiscal year, of the staffing and other costs associated with the 

USSOCOM-NCR over the future years defense program; (5) A 

description of the relationship between the USSOCOM-NCR and the 

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special 

Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict (ASD SOLIC); (6) The role 

of the ASD SOLIC in providing oversight of USSOCOM-NCR 

activities; and (7) Any other matters the Secretary deems 

appropriate. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web 

Initiative (sec. 344)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 343) that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from 

expending any funds in Operation and Maintenance, defense-wide 

(OMDW), for the Trans Regional Web Initiative (TRWI). 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from 

expending more than $2.0 million in OMDW for TRWI and restrict 

the use of such funds for the termination of the program as 

managed by U.S. Special Operations Command or for purposes of 

transitioning appropriate TRWI capabilities to other agencies.

In light of budget concerns for the U.S. Government, 

resource constraints for the Department of Defense, and shifts 

in the geopolitical environment and security strategies, we note 

our concern with regard to the Department’s direction for 

strategically engaging in the information environment. We 

remain skeptical of the effectiveness of the websites 

established under the TRWI and believe that available resources 

may better be used to support tactical and operational military 

information support activities. We believe strategic 

information operations activities, like TRWI, may more 

appropriately be managed by other relevant U.S. Government 
46

agencies, with the Department of Defense focused on contributing 

to an interagency approach that is responsive to militaryspecific operational requirements. 

If the Secretary of Defense deems it to be in the national 

security interests of the United States and appropriate under 

current fiscal pressures, we note the Department of Defense may 

use funds authorized by this Act for TRWI to conduct a pilot 

project using existing authorities with an appropriate U.S. 

Government agency, such as the Broadcasting Board of Governors. 

Such a pilot could be used to demonstrate the transition of 

appropriate TRWI capabilities to such agency and support the 

strategic information operations requirements of the Geographic 

Combatant Commanders. We believe that any such pilot should 

seek to demonstrate responsiveness to the time sensitive needs 

of the Department of Defense while integrating such activities 

with broader U.S. strategic communications objectives.

Consistent with this provision, we expect that the Department of 

Defense will not request additional funding for TRWI in fiscal 

year 2015 and beyond.

Subtitle F-Other Matters

Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units (sec. 351)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 599) that would 

amend section 974 of title 10, United States Code, to require 

that any gift made on the condition that the gift be used for 

the benefit of a military musical unit be credited to the 

appropriation or account providing the funds for such musical 

unit. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would authorize 

service secretaries to accept contributions of money, personal 

property, or services on the condition that such money, 

property, or services be used for the benefit of a military 

musical unit, and requiring that such contributions be credited 

to the appropriation or account for that musical unit.

Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility uniforms 

(sec. 352)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 351) that would 

establish as national policy a requirement for all the U.S. 

military services to use a joint combat camouflage uniform by 

October 1, 2018, with certain exceptions.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 
47

provision (sec. 351) that would direct the Secretary of Defense 

to reduce the separate development and fielding of servicespecific combat and camouflage utility uniforms in order to 

collectively adopt and field the same combat and camouflage 

utility uniforms for use by all members of the Armed Forces.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment that would combine both provisions and 

eliminate the 2018 deadline.

We note the provision adopted makes it the policy of the 

United States for the Secretary of Defense to eliminate the 

development and fielding of Armed Force-specific combat and 

camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms, in order 

to adopt and field a common combat and camouflage utility 

uniform, or family of uniforms, for specific combat 

environments, to be used by all members of the Armed Forces. 

Each Armed Force will be prohibited from adopting new combat and 

camouflage utility uniforms unless: (1) All the Armed Forces 

adopt the same uniform or family of uniforms; (2) An Armed Force 

adopts a uniform currently in use by another Armed Force; or (3) 

The Secretary of Defense grants an exception, based on unique 

circumstances or operational requirements.

We note that exceptions granted to this policy include: (1) 

Combat and camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms 

for use by special operations personnel; (2) Engineering 

modifications to existing combat and camouflage utility uniforms 

and families of uniforms such as power harnessing or generating 

textiles, fire resistant fabrics, and anti-vector, antimicrobial, and anti-bacterial treatments; (3) Ancillary uniform 

items such as headwear, footwear, body armor, and other items 

designated by the secretaries of the military departments; (4) 

Vehicle crew uniforms; (5) Service-specific cosmetic 

modifications; or (6) existing Service-specific uniforms that 

meet operational requirements.

We note that a secretary of a military department may not 

prevent the secretary of another military department from 

authorizing the use of any combat or camouflage utility uniform 

or family of uniforms approved for use by an Armed Force under 

the jurisdiction of the secretary. Furthermore, the secretary 

of a military department shall formally register with the Joint 

Clothing and Textiles Governance Board all current and future 

combat uniforms, camouflage utility uniforms, and families of 

uniforms.

We also note that 60 days after the enactment of this Act, 

the Secretary of Defense shall issue implementation guidance 

that requires the secretaries of the military departments to: 

(1) Establish joint performance criteria for the design, 

development, fielding, and characteristics of combat and 
48

camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms and include 

that criteria in all new requirements documents; (2) Continue to 

work together to assess and develop new technologies that could 

be incorporated into future combat and camouflage utility 

uniforms and families of uniforms to improve warfighter 

survivability; (3) Ensure that new combat and camouflage utility 

uniforms and families of uniforms meet the geographic and 

operational requirements of the commanders of the combatant 

commands; and (4) Ensure that all new combat and camouflage 

utility uniforms and families of uniforms achieve 

interoperability with all components of individual warfighter 

systems, including body armor, organizational clothing and 

equipment, and other individual protective systems.

We fully expect the Secretary of Defense to enforce this 

policy and not deviate from its intent to reduce the separate 

development and fielding of Armed Force-specific combat and 

camouflage uniforms and families of uniforms.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Authorization of appropriations for the Marine Corps Embassy 

Security Group

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 302) that would 

increase funding for the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group by 

$13.4 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note the funding tables reflect an increase of $35.0 

million for the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group.

Authorization of appropriations for Crisis Response Force

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 303) that would 

increase funding for Crisis Response Force by $10.6 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note the funding tables reflect an increase of $40.0 

million for Crisis Response Force.

Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land management 

related to Department of Defense readiness activities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 314) that would 

amend section 103A of the Sikes Act, section 670c-1 of title 16, 
49

United States Code, to permit lump sum payment and accrual of 

interest used for the purposes of the original agreement. This 

section would also permit the cooperative agreements to be used

to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of 

the U.S. Government, and sets limitations on agreements that are 

not on military installations. Finally, this section would also 

expire the authority on October 1, 2019, but permit any 

agreements that were entered into prior to September 30, 2019, 

to continue according to its terms and conditions.

The Senate committee-reported bill amendment contained no 

similar provision.

The agreement does not contain this provision.

Exclusions from definition of “chemical substance” under Toxic 

Substances Control Act 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 315) that would 

modify section 2602(2)(B) of title 15, United States Code, to 

add to the exclusions any component of any article including 

shot, bullets and other projectiles, propellants when 

manufactured for or used in such an article, and primers. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel 

procurement requirement

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 316) that would 

amend section 526 of the Energy Independence Security Act 

(Section 42 of United States Code 17142) to exempt the 

Department of Defense from the requirements related to contracts 

for alternative or synthetic fuel in that section.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of 

biofuels refineries

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 318) that would 

require the Department of Defense to obtain a congressional 

authorization before entering into a contract for the planning, 

design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuels refinery.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.
50

Military readiness and southern sea otter conservation 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 320) that would 

amend section 631 of title 10, United States Code, by adding a 

provision permitting the Secretary of the Defense to establish 

“Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas.” This provision 

would exempt southern sea otters from the Endangered Species Act 

of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533, 1538) and the Marine Mammal Protection 

Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain this provision.

Assessment of outreach for small business concerns owned and 

controlled by women and minorities required before conversion of 

certain functions to contractor performance 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 324) that would 

forbid a Department of Defense function performed by Department 

of Defense civilian employees and tied to a military base from 

being converted into a contractor function until the Secretary 

of Defense conducts an assessment to determine if the Department 

of Defense has carried out sufficient outreach programs to 

assist small businesses owned and controlled by women and 

socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain this provision.

Ordnance related records review and reporting requirement for 

Vieques and Culebra Islands, Puerto Rico 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 334) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense conduct a review of all 

Department of Defense records detailing the historical use of 

military munitions and training on Vieques and Culebra Islands, 

Puerto Rico.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain this provision.

We note that the Department of Defense, for land and water 

sites on Culebra Island for which the Department is responsible, 

has completed historical research under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) 

process and issued Preliminary Assessment reports concerning the 
51

Department’s former use of sites on Culebra Island for live-fire 

training. 

We also note that for these sites, the Army has completed 

site inspections and is currently conducting remedial 

investigations that will determine whether an environmental 

response action is required at specific sites. 

Finally, we note that the Department of Defense is in the 

process of cleaning up portions of the former operational ranges 

on Vieques and also is conducting preliminary assessments, site 

inspections, and remedial investigations to determine whether a 

response action is required under CERCLA at Vieques. Therefore, 

we encourage the Department of Defense to work with the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to ensure the documents and reports 

from the historical records reviews and investigations that the 

Department of Defense and the Army completed for those former 

military sites on Culebra and Vieques are made available to the 

public.

Authorization to institute a centralized, automated mail 

redirection system to improve the delivery of absentee ballots 

to military personnel serving outside the United States

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 352) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to 

transfer up to $4.5 million from defense-wide operation and 

maintenance to the Postal Service Fund for purposes of 

implementing the modernization of the U.S. Postal Service’s mail 

delivery system to improve the delivery of absentee ballots to 

military personnel serving outside the United States. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We understand that alternate funding has been used to 

modernize the U.S. Postal Service’s mail delivery system to 

improve the delivery of absentee ballots to military personnel 

serving outside the United States.

TITLE IV–MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A–Active Forces

End strengths for active forces (sec. 401)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 401) that would 

authorize the following end strengths for active duty personnel 

of the armed forces as of September 30, 2014: Army, 520,000; 

Navy, 323,600; Marine Corps, 190,200; and Air Force, 327,600.
52

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 401).

The agreement includes this provision.

End strength levels for the active forces for fiscal year 

2014 are set forth in the following table:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

 FY 2014 Change from

 __________________________ __________________________

 Service FY 2013 

 Authorized Request Recommendation FY 2014 FY 2013

 Request Authorized

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Army ..................... 552,100 520,000 520,000 0 -32,100

Navy ..................... 322,700 323,600 323,600 0 900

Marine Corps ............. 197,300 190,200 190,200 0 -7,100

Air Force ................ 329,460 327,600 327,600 0 -1,860

 _______________________________________________________________________

 DOD Total ....... 1,401,560 1,361,400 1,361,400 0 -40,160

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels 

and in annual limitation on certain end strength reductions 

(sec. 402)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 402) that would 

establish the following minimum end strengths for active-duty 

personnel as of September 30, 2014: Army, 520,000; Navy, 

323,600; Marine Corps, 190,200; and Air Force, 327,600.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would establish minimum active-duty end strengths 

for the Army of 510,000 and the Marine Corps of 188,000, and 

would amend section 403 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to increase the 

maximum annual reduction in end strength authorized by that 

section for the Army to 25,000 and for the Marine Corps to 

7,500.

Minimum end strength levels for active-duty personnel for 

fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the following table:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

 FY 2014 Change from

 __________________________ __________________________

 Service FY 2013 

 Authorized Recommendation FY 2013

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Army ..................... 542,700 510,000 -32,700

Navy ..................... 322,700 323,600 900 

Marine Corps ............. 193,500 188,000 -5,500

Air Force ................ 329,460 327,600 -1,860

 _______________________________________________________________________

 DOD Total ....... 1,388,360 1,349,200 -39,160

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
53

We note that continued fiscal constraints have forced the 

Army and the Marine Corps to alter their end strength reduction 

plans to reach their pre-sequester end strength targets of 

490,000 for the Army and 182,100 for the Marine Corps by the end 

of fiscal year 2015, 2 years before originally anticipated. In 

order to maintain a balance between end strength, readiness of 

the force, and modernization, we will support this altered 

reduction plan. However, we remain concerned that unfettered 

reductions in end strength will have a detrimental impact on 

force structure and, ultimately, operational mission capability 

and capacity among the services, and harm the morale of the 

force. The services should be very cautious in their efforts to 

further reduce the force to ensure that we do not break faith 

with those who continue to serve in the current conflicts, and 

those who have served our nation in war.

Subtitle B-Reserve Forces

End strengths for Selected Reserve (sec. 411)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 411) that would 

authorize the following end strengths for Selected Reserve 

personnel, including the end strengths for reserves on active 

duty in support of the reserves, as of September 30, 2014: the 

Army National Guard of the United States, 354,200; the Army 

Reserve, 205,000; the Navy Reserve, 59,100; the Marine Corps 

Reserve, 39,600; the Air National Guard of the United States, 

105,400; the Air Force Reserve, 70,400; and the Coast Guard 

Reserve, 9,000.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 411).

The agreement includes this provision.

End strength levels for the Selected Reserve for fiscal 

year 2014 are set forth in the following table: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

 FY 2014 Change from

 __________________________ __________________________

 Service FY 2013 

 Authorized Request Recommendation FY 2014 FY 2013

 Request Authorized

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Army National Guard ..... 358,200 354,200 354,200 0 -4,000

Army Reserve ............ 205,000 205,000 205,000 0 0

Navy Reserve ............ 62,500 59,100 59,100 0 -3,400

Marine Corps Reserve .... 39,600 39,600 39,600 0 0

Air National Guard ...... 105,700 105,400 105,400 0 -300

Air Force Reserve ....... 70,880 70,400 70,400 0 -480

 ________________________________________________________________________

 DOD Total ....... 841,880 833,700 833,700 0 -8,180
54

Coast Guard Reserve ..... 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the 

reserves (sec. 412)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 412) that would

authorize the following end strengths for reserves on active 

duty in support of the reserve components as of September 30, 

2014: the Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060; the 

Army Reserve, 16,261; the Navy Reserve, 10,159; the Marine Corps 

Reserve, 2,261; the Air National Guard of the United States, 

14,734; and the Air Force Reserve, 2,911.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 412).

The agreement includes this provision.

End strength levels for reserves on active duty in support 

of the reserves for fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the 

following table:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

 FY 2014 Change from

 __________________________ __________________________

 Service FY 2013 

 Authorized Request Recommendation FY 2014 FY 2013

 Request Authorized

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Army National Guard ...... 32,060 32,060 32,060 0 0

Army Reserve ............. 16,277 16,261 16,261 0 -16

Navy Reserve ............. 10,114 10,159 10,159 0 45

Marine Corps Reserve ..... 2,261 2,261 2,261 0 0

Air National Guard ....... 14,765 14,734 14,734 0 -31

Air Force Reserve ........ 2,888 2,911 2,911 0 23

 ________________________________________________________________________

 DOD Total ......... 78,365 78,386 78,386 0 21

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

End strengths for military technicians (dual status) (sec. 413)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 413) that would 

authorize the following end strengths for military technicians

(dual status) as of September 30, 2014: the Army National Guard 

of the United States, 27,210; the Army Reserve, 8,395; the Air 

National Guard of the United States, 21,875; and the Air Force 

Reserve, 10,429.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 413).

The agreement includes this provision.

End strength levels for military technicians (dual status) 

for fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the following table:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

 FY 2014 Change from

 __________________________ __________________________
55

 Service FY 2013 

 Authorized Request Recommendation FY 2014 FY 2013

 Request Authorized

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Army National Guard ..... 27,210 27,210 27,210 0 0

Army Reserve ............ 8,395 8,395 8,395 0 0

Air National Guard ...... 22,180 21,875 21,875 0 -305

Air Force Reserve ....... 10,400 10,429 10,429 0 29

 _______________________________________________________________________

 DOD Total ........ 68,185 67,909 67,909 0 -276

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status 

technicians (sec. 414)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 414) that would 

establish the following personnel limits for the reserve 

components of the Army and Air Force for non-dual status 

technicians as of September 30, 2014: the Army National Guard of 

the United States, 1,600; the Air National Guard of the United 

States, 350; the Army Reserve, 595; and the Air Force Reserve, 

90.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 414).

The agreement includes this provision.

Personnel limitations for non-dual status technicians for 

fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the following table:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

 FY 2014 Change from

 __________________________ __________________________

 Service FY 2013 

 Authorized Request Recommendation FY 2014 FY 2013

 Request Authorized

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Army National Guard...... 1,600 1,600 1,600 0 0

Air National Guard....... 350 350 350 0 0

Army Reserve ............ 595 595 595 0 0

Air Force Reserve ....... 90 90 90 0 0

 _______________________________________________________________________

 DOD Total ........ 2,635 2,635 2,635 0 0

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active 

duty for operational support (sec. 415)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 415) that would 

authorize the maximum number of reserve component personnel who 

may be on active duty or full-time National Guard duty under 

section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, during fiscal 

year 2014 to provide operational support.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 415).
56

The agreement includes this provision.

The maximum number of reserve component personnel who may 

be on active duty or full-time National Guard duty under section 

115(b) of title 10, United States Code, during fiscal year 2014 

is set forth in the following table:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

 FY 2014 Change from

 __________________________ __________________________

 Service FY 2013 

 Authorized Request Recommendation FY 2014 FY 2013

 Request Authorized

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Army National Guard ...... 17,000 17,000 17,000 0 0

Army Reserve ............. 13,000 13,000 13,000 0 0

Navy Reserve ............. 6,200 6,200 6,200 0 0

Marine Corps Reserve ..... 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0

Air National Guard ....... 16,000 16,000 16,000 0 0

Air Force Reserve ........ 14,000 14,000 14,000 0 0

 ________________________________________________________________________

 DOD Total ......... 69,200 69,200 69,200 0 0

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Subtitle C-Authorization of Appropriations

Military personnel (sec. 421)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 421) that would 

authorize appropriations for military personnel at the levels 

identified in section 4401 of division D of this Act.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 421).

The agreement includes this provision.

TITLE V-MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

Subtitle A-Officer Personnel Policy 

Generally

Congressional notification requirements related to increases in 

number of general and flag officers on Active Duty or in joint 

duty assignments (sec. 501)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 501) that would 

amend sections 526 of title 10, United States Code, to reduce by 

14 the total of the number of general and flag officers 

authorized to be on active duty in the military services, and by 

10 the number of general and flag officers authorized to be 

assigned to joint duty assignments. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 
57

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would amend section 

526 of title 10, United States Code, to require the secretary of

a military department to provide notice and rationale to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives whenever the secretary proposes to increase the 

number of general or flag officers above the lower of the 

statutory limit on the number of general or flag officers on 

active duty or the number of general or flag officers on active 

duty on January 1, 2014. The provision would also require the 

Secretary of Defense, the secretary of a military department, or 

the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to provide notice and 

rationale to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives whenever the secretary or Chairman 

proposes to increase the number of general or flag officers 

above the lower of the statutory limit of general or flag 

officers in joint duty assignments or the number of general or 

flag officers in joint duty assignments on January 1, 2014. The 

proposed increases will not take place until after the end of 

the 60-calendar day beginning on the date that notice is 

provided. The provision would also require the Secretary of 

Defense, beginning on March 1, 2015, to submit to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

an annual report on the number of general and flag officers on 

Active Duty and in joint duty assignments on January 1 of the 

year in which the report is submitted.

Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education 

upon original appointment as a commissioned officer (sec. 502)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 501) that would authorize service secretaries to award 

constructive service credit upon original appointment as a 

commissioned officer for special experience or training in 

certain cyberspace-related fields and for periods of advanced 

education in certain cyberspace-related fields beyond the 

baccalaureate degree level. Constructive service credited under 

this provision is limited to 1 year for each year of special 

experience, training or advanced education, and 3 years total of 

constructive service credit. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Selective early retirement authority for regular officers and 

selective early removal of officers from reserve active-status 

list (sec. 503)
58

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 512) that would 

amend section 14704 of title 10, United States Code, to require 

service secretaries to submit to selection boards considering 

officers for selective early removal from the reserve activestatus list a list of reserve component officers that includes 

the name of each officer on the reserve active-status list in 

the same grade and competitive category in the zone of 

consideration except for officers who have been approved for 

voluntary retirement or who will be involuntarily retired. The 

provision would also require service secretaries to specify the 

number of officers that a selection board may recommend for 

removal from the reserve active-status list.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 506).

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment and would also amend section 638a(b)(2) of title 10, 

United States Code, to authorize consideration for selective 

early retirement of: (1) officers in the regular grade of 

lieutenant colonel or commander who have failed to be selected 

for promotion at least one time, and (2) officers in the grade 

of colonel, or in the case of the Navy, captain, who have served 

on active duty in that grade for at least 2 years and whose 

names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion.

Subtitle B-Reserve Component Management

Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve components 

(sec. 511)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 726) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to share with any adjutant 

general of a state the contact information of members of the 

Individual Ready Reserve and individual mobilization augmentees 

who reside in the state of such adjutant general for the purpose 

of conducting suicide prevention outreach efforts.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would amend section 10219 of title 10, United 

States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Defense to share with 

the adjutant general of a state, upon request, the contact 

information of members of the Individual Ready Reserve and 

individual mobilization augmentees in order for the adjutant 

general to include those members in suicide prevention efforts. 

The amendment would also amend section 706 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-

239) to authorize education and outreach for suicide prevention 
59

in the existing pilot program on enhancements of Department of 

Defense efforts on mental health in the National Guard and 

reserves through community partnerships.

Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the 

active and inactive National Guard (sec. 512)

The House bill contained a provision (sec.513) that would 

provide temporary authority for the Secretary of the Army and 

Secretary of the Air Force to maintain an active status and an 

inactive status list of members in the inactive National Guard. 

The provision would also authorize the transfer of officers of 

the Army and Air National Guard from the Selected Reserve to the 

inactive National Guard and from the inactive National Guard to 

the Selected Reserve. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 507) that would authorize the transfer of officers of the 

Army and Air National Guard from the Selected Reserve to the 

inactive National Guard and from the inactive National Guard to 

the Selected Reserve during the period ending on December 31, 

2016. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain reserve 

component units and involuntary mobilizations of certain 

Reserves (sec. 513)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 511) that would 

require the service secretaries to provide at least 120 days 

advance notice to reserve component units, and individuals not 

part of a unit, prior to an order to active duty for deployment 

in connection with a contingency operation, and 120 days advance 

notice to such units if their deployments are canceled, 

postponed, or altered. In the event such notice was not 

provided, the provision would require the Secretary concerned to 

report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives explaining the reasons for such 

failure.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 508) that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

personally approve of any decision to cancel the deployment of a 

reserve component unit within 180 days of its scheduled 

deployment date when an active-duty unit would be sent instead 

to perform the same mission, and to notify the congressional 

defense committees and governors concerned whenever such a 

decision is made.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 
60

amendment that would add the requirement for the service 

secretaries to provide at least 120 days advance notice of an 

involuntary mobilization of a member of a reserve component who 

is not assigned to a unit or who is to be mobilized apart from 

the member’s unit. This requirement would apply to individual 

members mobilized on or after the date that is 120 days after 

the date of enactment of this Act and would sunset on the date 

of the completion of the withdrawal of United States combat 

forces from Afghanistan.

Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component 

general and flag officers in an active status (sec. 514)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 514) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the 

general officer and flag officer requirements for members of the 

reserve component in an active status, and to submit a report to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives containing the results of the review not later 

than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in 

American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

Islands (sec. 515)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 515) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study to determine 

the feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in 

American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

Islands. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to report on the feasibility of 

establishing a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and 

in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

Subtitle C-General Service Authorities

Provision of information under Transition Assistance Program 

about disability-related employment and education protections 

(sec. 521)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 524) that would 
61

expand the training required under the transition assistance 

program to include information about disability-related 

employment and education protections available to service 

members and information on eligibility for certain education 

assistance programs administered by the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs. The provision would also require the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs to submit a report to the Committees on 

Veterans’ Affairs and the Committees on Armed Services of the 

House of Representatives and the Senate assessing the 

feasibility of providing certain transition assistance program 

instruction at overseas locations.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would expand transition assistance program 

training to include information on disability-related employment 

and education protections, but would strike the rest of section 

524 of the House bill.

Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic stress 

disorder or traumatic brain injury before administrative 

separation (sec. 522)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 528) that would 

amend section 1177 of title 10, United States Code, to remove 

the exception for proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice from the requirement for a medical examination of 

certain members diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder or 

traumatic brain injury, or who otherwise reasonably alleges the 

influence of such a condition. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would amend section 

1177 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify that an 

administrative separation in lieu of court-martial is an 

administrative separation within the meaning of this statute.

Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral 

occupational standard for military career designators (sec. 523)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 526) that would 

amend section 543 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103-160) to establish a consistent 

definition of “gender-neutral occupational standard” for use 

pursuant to the requirements of that section.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
62

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment.

Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation 

Plan (sec. 524)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530D) that would 

express the sense of the Congress that no later than September 

2015 the service secretaries should develop, review, and 

validate individual occupational standards to assess and assign 

members of the armed forces to units, including special 

operation forces, and that they should complete all assessments 

relating to the women in service implementation review by 

January 1, 2016.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment.

Provision of military service records to the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs in an electronic format (sec. 525)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 597) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, to make specified records of each 

member of the armed forces who was discharged or released from 

the armed forces on or after September 11, 2001, available to 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in an electronic format. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require that 

the specified records of service members discharged or released 

from the armed forces on or after January 1, 2014, be made 

available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in an electronic 

format.

Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System (sec. 526)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 521) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the 

backlog of pending reserve component cases in the Integrated 

Disability Evaluation System (IDES) and provide a description of 

the progress being made to improve the tracking and visibility 

of pending cases by both active duty and reserve component 

members during each phase or step of the IDES. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
63

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense, in 

consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, to conduct 

a review of the backlog of pending reserve component cases in 

the IDES and provide a description of the progress being made to 

improve the tracking and visibility of pending cases by both 

active duty and reserve component members during each phase or 

step of the IDES, to include when a military treatment facility 

is assigned a packet and pending case for action regarding a 

service member and when a packet is at the Veterans Tracking 

Application and Disability Rating Activity Site of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs.

Subtitle D-Military Justice Matters, Other 

Than Sexual Assault Prevention and Response 

and Related Reforms

Modification of eligibility for appointment as judge on the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (sec. 531)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 561) that would amend Article 142 of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice (section 942 of title 10, United States Code) 

to authorize appointment of former commissioned officers of a 

regular component of an armed force as judges on the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. However, these 

former officers could not be appointed as a judge of the court 

within 7 years after relief from active duty. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would amend Article 

142 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (section 942 of 

title 10, United States Code) to provide that a person may not 

be appointed as a judge of the court within seven years after 

retirement from active duty as a commissioned officer of a 

regular component of an armed force.

Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members of 

the Armed Forces and chaplains of such members (sec. 532)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530) that would 

amend section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) (“section 533”) to expand 

the required accommodation of the moral and religious beliefs of 

service members to include actions and speech, and would limit 

disciplinary and administrative action to those beliefs, 

actions, and speech that cause actual harm to good order and 
64

discipline.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 512) that would amend section 533 to require the 

accommodation of individual expressions of belief by service 

members unless such expressions of belief could have an adverse 

impact on military readiness, unit cohesion, and good order and 

discipline. The Senate provision would also require that 

regulations implementing section 533 be prescribed within 120 

days of enactment of this Act.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require the regulations implementing 

section 533 be prescribed within 90 days of the date of 

enactment of this Act.

Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces compliance with 

regulations for the protection of rights of conscience of 

members of the Armed Forces and their chaplains (sec. 533)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 513) that would require the Department of Defense 

Inspector General (DOD IG) to assess and report to the 

congressional defense committees on the compliance of the 

Department of Defense with regulations promulgated under section

533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112-239), within 180 days of promulgation. The 

provision would also require the DOD IG to investigate the 

Department’s and the services’ compliance with those regulations 

with respect to adverse personnel actions within 18 months of 

promulgating the regulations.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would strike the first report required within 180 

days of the regulatory promulgation.

Survey of military chaplains views on Department of Defense 

policy regarding chaplain prayers outside of religious services 

(sec. 534)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 529) that would 

amend sections 3547, 4337, 6031, 8547, and 9337 of title 10, 

United States Code, to provide that a chaplain, if called upon 

to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, had the 

prerogative to close such prayer according to the traditions, 

expressions, and religious exercises of that chaplain’s 

endorsing faith group.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
65

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to conduct a survey of military chaplains 

to assess whether restrictions placed on prayers offered in 

public or non-religious settings have prevented them from 

exercising the tenets of their faith as prescribed by their 

endorsing faith group, and whether those restrictions have had 

an adverse impact on their ability to fulfill their duties to 

minister to members of the armed forces and their families.

Subtitle E-Member Education and Training

Additional requirements for approval of educational programs for 

purposes of certain educational assistance under laws 

administered by the Secretary of Defense (sec. 541)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 567) that would 

place limitations on when educational assistance may be used to 

pursue civilian certifications and licenses, and would authorize 

the use of various educational assistance benefits under the 

administration of the Secretary of Defense to pursue civilian 

certifications and licenses.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 524) that would establish a new section 2006a of title 10, 

United States Code, to require that educational institutions 

participating in certain Department of Defense education 

assistance programs enter into and comply with program 

participation agreements under title IV of the Higher Education 

Act, and to meet certain other standards. The provision would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to waive these requirements 

in certain cases.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would modify the conditions under which the 

Secretary may authorize education assistance for programs that 

do not meet the standards specified in the provision.

Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for 

military occupational specialties with skills and training 

required for civilian certifications and licenses (sec. 542)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 566) that would 

require the service secretaries to make information on civilian 

credentialing opportunities available to members of the armed 

forces during all stages of their military occupational 

specialty training. The provision would also require the 

service secretaries to provide information on military course 

training curricula, syllabi, and materials, levels of military 

advancement attained, and professional skills developed by 
66

service members, to civilian credentialing agencies, for the 

purposes of the administration of education benefits under the 

purview of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 525) that would require the information on 

course materials, levels of military advancement attained, and 

professional skills to be provided to entities approved by the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or by state approving agencies, 

in addition to civilian credentialing agencies.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Report on the Troops to Teachers program (sec. 543)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 570) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

not later than March 1, 2014, a report on the Troops to Teachers 

program that includes an evaluation of whether: (1) there is a 

need to broaden eligibility to allow service members and 

veterans without a bachelor’s degree admission into the program 

and whether the program can be strengthened, and (2) a pilot 

program should be established to demonstrate the potential 

benefit of an institution-based award for troops to teachers.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 527) that would express the sense of the Senate to 

strongly urge the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the Troops 

to Teachers program is a priority of the Nation’s commitment to 

the higher education of members of the armed forces, and to 

provide funds to the Troops to Teachers program in order to help 

separating members of the armed forces and veterans who wish to 

transition into a teaching career.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment.

Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring 

automatic operation of current prohibition on accrual of 

interest on direct student loans of certain members of the Armed 

Forces (sec. 544)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 570A) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress 

within 90 days assessing the feasibility of automatically 

applying the prohibition on accrual of interest on student loans 

for certain deployed service members, and how the Department 

would implement such automatic application.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
67

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment to require the report within 180 days after the date 

of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle F-Defense Dependents’ Education 

and Military Family Readiness Matters

Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies 

that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and 

Department of Defense civilian employees (sec. 551)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 571) that would 

authorize $20.0 million for continuation of the Department of 

Defense (DOD) assistance program to local educational agencies 

(LEAs) that are impacted by the enrollment of dependent children 

of military members and DOD civilian employees. The provision 

would also authorize $5.0 million for assistance to LEAs with 

significant changes in enrollment of school-aged dependents of 

military members and civilian employees due to base closures, 

force structure changes, or force relocations.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 571) that would authorize $25.0 million for the assistance 

program to LEAs impacted by the enrollment of dependent children 

of military members and civilian employees.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Impact aid for children with severe disabilities (sec. 552)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 572) that would authorize $5.0 million in defense-wide 

operation and maintenance for impact aid payments for children 

with disabilities under section 8003(d) of the Elementary and 

Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(d)), using the 

formula set forth in section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-

398), for continuation of Department of Defense assistance to 

local educational agencies that benefit eligible dependents with 

severe disabilities.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary 

and secondary education component of Department of Defense 

education program (sec. 553)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 573) that would 
68

amend section 2164(l) of title 10, United States Code, to allow 

the Secretary of Defense to retain the tuition payments made by 

participants in the Department of Defense virtual elementary and 

secondary education programs. The retained tuition would be 

used to provide support for the virtual education programs 

authorized by section 2164(l).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Family support programs for immediate family members of members 

of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces (sec. 

554)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 554) that would 

authorize the Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, to 

conduct up to three pilot programs to assess the feasibility and 

benefits of providing family support activities for the 

immediate family members of the armed forces assigned to special 

operations forces. The provision would require that family 

support programs provided under the pilot not duplicate those 

family support programs being provided by the secretary of a 

military department. The provision would limit authorization 

for any program conducted under the pilot to fiscal years 2014 

through 2016, and limit to $5.0 million the amount that may be 

spent on the pilot programs in a fiscal year. The provision 

would also require the Commander, U.S. Special Operations 

Command, to provide a report to the congressional defense 

committees within 180 days of the completion of a program 

conducted under this pilot. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would authorize the Commander, U.S. Special 

Operations Command, to conduct up to three pilot programs to 

assess the feasibility and benefits of providing family support 

activities for the immediate family members of the armed forces 

assigned to special operations forces. In selecting and 

conducting any pilot program, the Commander would be required to 

coordinate with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 

Readiness. The amendment would require that family support 

programs provided under the pilot not duplicate those family 

support programs being provided by the secretary of a military 

department. The amendment would limit authorization for any 

program conducted under the pilot to fiscal years 2014 through 

2016, and limit to $5.0 million the amount that may be spent on 

the pilot programs in a fiscal year. The amendment would also 
69

require the Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, in 

coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel 

and Readiness, to provide a detailed report to the congressional 

defense committees within 180 days of the completion of a 

program conducted under this pilot.

Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the armed 

forces in child custody determinations (sec. 555)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 552) that would 

amend title II of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 

App. 521 et seq.) to provide that if a court renders a temporary 

custody order based solely on the deployment or anticipated 

deployment of a service member, the court shall require the 

reinstatement of the prior custody order upon the return of the 

service member from deployment, unless the court finds that 

reinstatement is not in the best interest of the child. The 

provision would also prohibit a court from considering the 

absence of a servicemember by reason of deployment, or the 

possibility of deployment, as the sole factor in determining the 

best interest of a child.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1053) that would express the sense of the Senate that 

State courts should not consider military deployment as the sole 

factor in determining child custody in a State court proceeding 

involving a parent who is a member of the armed forces. The 

best interest of the child should always prevail in custody 

cases, but members of the armed forces should not lose custody 

of their children based solely upon service to our country.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would make it a sense of Congress. 

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards

Repeal of limitation on number of Medals of Honor that may be 

awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces (sec. 561)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 582) that would 

amend sections 3744, 6247, and 8744 of title 10, United States 

Code, to authorize the award of more than one Medal of Honor to 

a person whose subsequent acts justify an additional award. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 581(a)).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding 

Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air 
70

Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal (sec. 562)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 583) that would 

amend sections 3744 and 8744 of title 10, United States Code, to 

require that recommendations for the award of the Medal of 

Honor, Distinguished Service Cross, Air Force Cross, or 

Distinguished Service Medal for members of the Army and Air 

Force be made within 3 years and that the award be made within 5 

years after the date of the act justifying the award. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 581(b)).

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast 

Guard Medal of Honor roll requirements (sec. 563)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 584) that would 

amend chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, to establish a 

roll designated as the “Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard 

Medal of Honor Roll” and require the service secretaries to 

record on this roll the name of each person who has been awarded 

a Medal of Honor. The provision would also amend section 1562 

of title 38, United States Code, to provide for the automatic 

enrollment and payment of the special pension to living Medal of 

Honor recipients.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 582).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Prompt replacement of military decorations (sec. 564)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590B) that would 

amend section 1135 of title 10, United States Code, to require 

service secretaries, upon receipt of a request for the 

replacement of a military decoration, to ensure that: (1) all 

actions to be taken with respect to the request, including 

verification of the service record of the recipient of the 

military decoration, are completed within one year; and (2) the 

replacement military decoration is mailed to the person 

requesting the replacement military decoration within 60 days 

after the verification of the service record. The provision 

would also require an annual report on compliance with this 

requirement

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require mailing of the replacement military 
71

decoration within 90 days of verification of the service record 

and that would delete the requirement for an annual report.

Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to victims 

of the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, 

and at Fort Hood, Texas (sec. 565)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 585) that would 

require the award of the Purple Heart to the victims of the 

attacks that occurred at the recruiting station in Little Rock, 

Arkansas on June 1, 2009, and at Fort Hood, Texas on November 5, 

2009.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

service secretary concerned to review the circumstances of and 

available evidence pertaining to the attacks at the recruiting 

station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas; to 

award the Purple Heart to victims of those attacks determined 

pursuant to that review to be eligible for the award; and to 

report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives within 180 days of the date of 

enactment of this Act on the results of that review. The 

included provision would also require the Secretary of Defense 

to review the eligibility criteria for the Purple Heart to 

establish the actions or conditions for which the Purple Heart 

shall be awarded to a member of an armed force who has been 

wounded in such action. The included provision would require 

the Secretary to report to the Committees on Armed Services of 

the Senate and the House of Representatives within 180 days of 

the date of enactment of this Act on the results of that review, 

including any recommendations for change to the Purple Heart 

criteria the Secretary considers appropriate.

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former members 

of the Armed Forces previously recommended for award of the 

Medal of Honor (sec. 566)

The agreement includes a provision that would amend section 

552(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2002 (Public Law 107-107), to authorize the award of the Medal 

of Honor to veterans of the armed forces who, although they were 

not Jewish-American or Hispanic-American war veterans, were 

recommended for award of the Medal of Honor as a result of the 

required review of service records of certain Jewish-American 

war veterans and Hispanic-American war veterans.
72

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of valor 

during the Vietnam War (sec. 567)

The agreement includes a provision that would authorize the 

President to award the Medal of Honor to Sergeant First Class 

Bennie G. Adkins, United States Army, and to Specialist Four 

Donald P. Sloat, United States Army, for acts of valor during 

the Vietnam War. 

Authorization for award of the Distinguished Service Cross for 

acts of valor during the Korean and Vietnam Wars (sec. 568)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 588) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Army to award the Distinguished 

Service Cross to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts 

of valor during the Korean War. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 583) and a provision (sec. 584) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Army to award the Distinguished 

Service Cross to Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., for acts of valor 

during the Vietnam War. 

The agreement includes a provision that would authorize the 

Secretary of the Army to award the Distinguished Service Cross 

to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts of valor 

during the Korean War; to Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., for acts of 

valor during the Vietnam War; and to Specialist Four Robert L. 

Towles for acts of valor during the Vietnam War.

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First 

Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil 

War (sec. 569)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590C) that would 

authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to then 

First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the 

Civil War, effective upon receipt by the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives of a 

report providing information on the process and materials used 

by review boards for the consideration of Medal of Honor 

recommendations for acts of heroism that occurred during the 

Civil War.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would remove the requirement for receipt of the

report as the report has already been received by the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 
73

Representatives.

Subtitle H—Other Studies, Reviews, 

Policies, and Reports

Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation 

reports to include 360-degree assessment approach (sec. 571)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 563) that would 

require service secretaries to develop an assessment program 

modeled after the current Department of the Army Multi-Source 

Assessment and Feedback Program, known as the “360-degree 

approach,” and would require the Secretary of Defense to submit 

to Congress, not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

of this Act, a report containing the results of an assessment of 

the feasibility of including the 360-degree approach as part of 

the performance evaluation reports.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, not 

later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, a 

report containing the results of an assessment of the 

feasibility of including a 360-degree assessment approach as 

part of performance evaluation reports.

Report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding 

members of the Armed Forces with HIV or Hepatitis B (sec. 572)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550F) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report 

on the use of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual 

for Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive articles, and 

regulations with regard to service members living with or at 

risk of contracting HIV. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit, not later than 180 days after 

the date of enactment of this Act, a report to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on 

Department of Defense personnel policies regarding members of 

the armed forces infected with human immunodeficiency virus or 

Hepatitis B. The report shall include an assessment of whether 

the policies reflect an evidence-based, medically accurate 
74

understanding of how these conditions are contracted, how they 

can be transmitted to others, and the risk of transmission.

Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of 

secondary schools (sec. 573)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530G) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to implement a means for 

ensuring that graduates of a secondary school, including 

graduates who receive diplomas from secondary schools that are 

legally operating or who otherwise complete a program of 

secondary education in compliance with state law, are required 

to meet the same standard of any test, assessment, or screening 

tool used to identify persons for recruitment and enlistment in 

the armed forces.

The Senate committee-passed bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Comptroller General report on use of determination of 

personality disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to separate 

members from the Armed Forces (sec. 574)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530H) that would 

require the Comptroller General of the United States, not later 

than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, to submit 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives a report evaluating: (1) the use by the 

secretaries of the military departments, since January 1, 2007, 

of the authority to separate members due to unfitness for duty 

because of a mental condition not amounting to disability, 

including separation on the basis of a personality disorder or 

adjustment disorder and the number of members separated on such 

basis; (2) the extent to which the secretaries failed to comply 

with regulatory requirements in separating members of the armed 

forces on the basis of a personality or adjustment disorder; and 

(3) the impact of such a separation on the ability of veterans 

so separated to access service-connected disability 

compensation, disability severance pay, and disability 

retirement pay. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Comptroller General to submit 

the report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives not later than one year after the 

date of enactment of this Act.
75

Subtitle I—Other Matters

Accounting for members of the armed forces and Department of 

Defense civilian employees listed as missing and related reports 

(sec. 581)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 591) that would amend section 1501 of title 10, United 

States Code, to require the Deputy Assistant Secretary of 

Defense for Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Affairs to conduct 

periodic briefings for families of missing persons on Department 

activities to account for those persons.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require the Deputy Assistant Secretary of 

Defense for Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Affairs to 

disseminate appropriate information on the status of missing 

persons to authorized family members. The provision would also 

require the Secretary of Defense, by no later than 180 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, to submit a report to 

the appropriate committees of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives detailing certain statistical data relative to 

the recovery of remains of missing service members from various 

conflicts, including those that remain missing, and a report 

assessing the organization of the prisoner of war/missing in 

action accounting community, including command and control over 

its constituent elements, whether certain of those elements 

should be reorganized, moved, or consolidated, and how the 

Secretary will ensure greater oversight of the community.

Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing 

reports of certain recovered persons who were never placed in a 

missing status (sec. 582)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 592) that would amend sections 1506 and 1513 of title 10, 

United States Code, to include as privileged information, for 

the purposes of personnel files maintained under the system for 

accounting for missing persons, any survival, evasion, 

resistance, and escape debriefing reports by certain persons 

returned to United States control under a promise of 

confidentiality.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect 
76

consolidation of North Georgia College and State University and 

Gainesville State College (sec. 583)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 591) that would 

amend section 2111a(f) of title 10, United States Code, to 

reflect the name change of North Georgia College and State 

University to The University of North Georgia. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 528).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Review of security of military installations, including 

barracks, temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family 

residences (sec. 584)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 565) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of security 

measures on military installations, specifically with regard to 

barracks and multi-family housing units on military 

installations, for the purpose of ensuring the safety of members 

of the armed forces and their dependents who reside on military 

installations, and to submit a report containing the results of 

the review to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of 

enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of security measures on 

military installations, specifically with regard to access to 

barracks, temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family housing 

units on military installations, for the purpose of ensuring the 

safety of members of the armed forces and their dependents who 

reside on military installations, and to submit a report 

containing the results of the review to Congress not later than 

180 days after the date of enactment of this Act. . 

We intend for the Secretary’s review to consider a wide 

range of access and security issues, including but not limited 

to issues regarding sexual assault prevention and response. We 

expect the Secretary to take into consideration the findings of 

the three reviews of security measures at U.S. military 

installations worldwide by the Department of the Navy, the 

Department of Defense, and the independent panel following the 

shooting at the Washington Navy Yard.

Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National 

Military Cemeteries (sec. 585)
77

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 592) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Army to enter into concession 

contracts for transportation, interpretative, and other services 

in support of visitors at Arlington National Cemetery and the 

United States Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home National Cemetery. 

This section would also require that each concession contract 

ensure the protection, dignity, and solemnity of the cemetery at 

which services are provided. Furthermore, the section would 

prohibit the Secretary of the Army from instituting a concession 

contract for operation of the gift shop at Arlington National 

Cemetery without subsequent authorization. In providing for 

transportation services at Arlington National Cemetery, the 

provision directs the Secretary of the Army to ensure that 

service provides visitors with access to the Custis Lee Mansion.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a technical 

amendment.

Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by 

members of the Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans (sec. 

586)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 596) that would 

amend section 4 of title 4, United States Code, to authorize 

members of the armed forces not in uniform and veterans to 

render the military salute in the manner provided for persons in 

uniform. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results (sec. 

587)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 562) that would 

direct the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the results of 

command climate assessments are provided to the relevant 

individual commander and to the next higher level of command; 

require service secretaries to include in the performance 

evaluation of commanders a designated form where senior 

commanders can indicate whether the commander has conducted the 

required climate assessments; require the Inspector General of 

the Department of Defense to develop a system to track whether 

commanders are conducting command climate assessments; and 

require unit commanders to develop a compliance report that 

includes a comprehensive overview of the concerns that unit 
78

members expressed in climate assessments, data showing how 

leadership is perceived in the unit, and a detailed strategic 

plan on how leadership plans to address the expressed concerns. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure 

that the results of command climate assessments are provided to 

the relevant individual commander and to the next higher level 

of command; require service secretaries to include in the 

performance evaluation of commanders a statement by the 

commander regarding whether the commander has conducted the 

required command climate assessments; and require that the 

failure of a commander to conduct the required command climate 

assessments be noted in the commander’s performance evaluation.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Designation of state student cadet corps as Department of 

Defense youth organizations

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 516) that would 

amend section 508(d) of title 32, United States Code, to add to 

the list of youth and charitable organizations eligible to 

receive certain services from the National Guard any state 

student cadet corps authorized under state law.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 509) that would amend section 509 of title 32, United 

States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to use the 

National Guard to conduct the National Guard Youth ChalleNGe 

Program, and require the Chief of the National Guard Bureau to 

conduct the program in such states as the Chief considers 

appropriate, to prescribe the standards and procedures for 

selecting program participants, and to submit a report to 

Congress annually on the program.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

Authority for joint professional military education phase II 

instruction and credit to be offered and awarded through seniorlevel course of School of Advanced Military Studies of the 
79

United States Army Command and General Staff College

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 521) that would amend section 2151(b) of title 10, United 

States Code, to authorize the School of Advanced Military 

Studies senior-level course at the Army Command and General 

Staff College to offer joint professional military education 

(JPME) phase II instruction and credit.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the conference report to accompany the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112-239) recommended that JPME II credit for participation 

in the senior-level course of the School of Advanced Military 

Studies of the United States Army Command and General Staff 

College be awarded through the Army War College. This is a 

senior service college level course and attendance is determined 

through the selection process for Senior Service College. We 

direct the Army to work with the Middle States Commission on 

Higher Learning to designate the School of Advanced Military 

Studies to be an additional location of study for the U.S. Army 

War College in order to award JPME II credit to students who 

successfully complete this course.

Authority for Uniformed Services University of the Health 

Sciences to support undergraduate and other medical education 

and training programs for military medical personnel

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 522) that would amend sections 2112(a) and 2113 of title 

10, United States Code, to provide greater flexibility to the 

Secretary of Defense, through the Uniformed Services University 

of the Health Sciences (USUHS), to access federal resources 

outside of the National Capital Region and to enable the USUHS 

to grant undergraduate degrees, certificates, and certifications 

in addition to advanced degrees.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We believe that further analysis and review of the 

authorities and support that may be necessary to allow the 

Medical Education and Training Campus (METC), the tri-service 

medical training center in San Antonio, Texas, to upgrade its 

health education programs is required. We understand that the 

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs has 

established a working group to address several of these issues. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense to expand this working 

group to include the Director of Training Readiness and Strategy 
80

of the Department of Defense, and other appropriate 

representatives outside of the health communities that may be 

impacted, to develop a consensus on a way forward that meets the 

needs of the services and the service members in a costefficient manner. We will await the results of such a consensus 

before considering expanding authorities to various 

organizations to support the METC.

Command responsibility and accountability for remains of members 

of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who die outside 

the United States

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 523) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, within 60 days of enactment of 

this Act, to take such steps as necessary to ensure that there 

is continuous, designated military command responsibility and 

accountability for the care, handling, and transportation of the 

remains of each deceased member of the armed services who dies 

outside the United States.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We expect the Department of Defense and the military 

services to ensure the effective exercise of command oversight 

over the process of returning the remains of service members to 

their families.

Expansion of eligibility for associate degree programs under the 

Community College of the Air Force

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 523) that would amend section 9315(b) of title 10, United 

States Code, to authorize the Community College of the Air Force 

to award associate degrees to enlisted members of armed forces 

other than the Air Force who participate in joint-service 

medical training and education or instructors in such jointservice medical training and education. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We believe that further analysis and review of the 

authorities and support is required before the Medical Education 

and Training Campus (METC), the tri-Service medical training 

center in San Antonio, Texas, upgrades its health education 

programs. We understand that the Assistant Secretary of Defense 

for Health Affairs has established a working group to address 

several of these issues.
81

We direct the Secretary of Defense to expand the working 

group to include representatives from the Department’s Office of 

Transition Assistance and other appropriate representatives 

outside of the health communities that may be impacted to 

develop a plan that meets the needs of the Services and the 

service members in a cost-efficient manner. We will await the 

completion of the plan before authorizing additional authorities 

for the various organizations that support the METC.

Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions 

relating to correction of military records

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 525) that would 

amend chapter 79 and sections 1034 and 1552 of title 10, United 

States Code, to revise procedures for judicial review of final 

military personnel decisions relating to correction of military 

records.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Coverage of military occupational specialties relating to 

military information technology under pilot program on receipt 

of civilian credentials for skills required for military 

occupational specialties

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 526) that would require that the military occupational 

specialties designated for the purposes of the pilot program on 

receipt of civilian credentials authorized by section 558 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public 

Law 112-81) include those specialties relating to the military 

information technology workforce.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Report on data and information collected in connection with 

Department of Defense review of laws, policies, and regulations 

restricting service of female members of the Armed Forces

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530C) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to provide the Committees on 

Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a 

report containing the specific results and data produced during 

the research programs, tests, surveys, consultant reports, 

assessments, and similar projects conducted in support of the 

requirement in section 535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
82

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) to 

review laws, policies, and regulations restricting the service 

of female members of the armed forces.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the Department of Defense has provided the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives RAND’s 2012 technical report entitled “A New 

Look at Gender and Minority Differences in Officer Career 

Progression in the Military” prepared for the Office of the 

Secretary of Defense as part of the review required by section 

535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011.

Meetings with respect to religious liberty

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530E) that would 

require the Department of Defense to provide to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

advance written notice of any meeting held between Department 

employees and civilians for the purpose of writing, revising, 

implementing, enforcing, or seeking advice, input, or counsel 

regarding military policy related to religious liberty.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We believe the Department and the military services should 

proactively reach out to and meet with religious groups of all 

faiths when formulating and revising policies that impact 

religious freedom and tolerance within the military. We are 

becoming increasingly concerned over reports that the Department 

and the services appear more responsive to some religious groups 

and interests than others. The Department and the services must 

be proactive in their efforts to overcome this perception and to 

ensure the fairness and equity of policies and regulations that 

address the religious liberty of service members and their 

families.

Proof of period of military service for purposes of interest 

rate limitation under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530F) that would 

amend section 207 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 

U.S.C. App. 527) to expand the ways in which a servicemember may 

prove a period of military service for the purposes of the 

interest rate limitation under that Act.
83

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550C) that would 

establish the Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel to 

provide recommendations to the service secretaries on the 

development of policies, programs, and procedures to prevent and 

respond to hazing in the armed forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that section 534 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, Public Law 112-239, 

required the Services, along with the Coast Guard, to review the 

treatment of hazing and report the results of the reviews to the 

appropriate congressional committees. As a result of the 

review, the Marine Corps revised its hazing policy on May 20, 

2013, to prohibit all forms of hazing. The Army established a 

Hazing Policy Assessment Team to review all hazing cases from 

2006 through 2013, and the Navy established the Office of Hazing 

Prevention.

In addition, the Services are either tracking or in the 

process of tracking hazing incidents, and are continuing efforts 

to address prevention of hazing in their force. We understand 

that the Joint Service Committee on Military Justice recommended 

changes to specifically address hazing under the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice (UCMJ). We expect the Department of Defense, 

and the Department of Homeland Security for the Coast Guard, to 

continue to monitor this issue to ensure that the recommended 

changes to the UCMJ are implemented, and that all the Services 

have the ability to track hazing incidents within their Service.

Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of the 

Armed Forces who serve in combat zones

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 551) that would 

amend chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

design of a spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, approved by 

the Secretary of Defense, to identify and recognize the spouse 

of a member of the armed forces who is serving or has served in 

a combat zone for a period of more than 30 days. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 
84

We note that section 901(b) of title 36, United States 

Code, authorizes the wearing of a service lapel button approved 

by the Secretary of Defense by the immediate family of an 

individual serving in the armed forces of the United States 

during any period of war or hostilities in which the armed 

forces of the United States are engaged.

Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces for 

active duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 553) that would 

amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 501 et 

seq.) to authorize a service member to refinance a principal 

residence in circumstances where the service member was unable 

to continue residing in the residence by virtue of receiving 

permanent change of station orders, or when deployed or 

mobilized in support of a military operation for a period of at 

least 18 months.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Transition of members of the Armed Forces and their families 

from military to civilian life

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 555) that would 

express the sense of the Congress on the role of federal and 

State governments in ensuring a seamless transition back to 

civilian life for service members and their families.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We believe that members of the armed forces and their 

families make great sacrifices on behalf of the country, and 

their transition from military to civilian life should be as 

seamless as possible by providing them opportunities to earn 

civilian occupational credentials and licenses. State and local 

governments and industries should streamline methods for 

assessing the equivalency of military training and experience, 

and accelerate occupational and professional licensure and 

certifications for members and spouses. Further, we believe 

that private employers should, to the extent practicable, do 

their utmost to educate and inform their managers, supervisors, 

and human resource departments on the advantages of hiring 

qualified veterans who have service-connected permanent total 

disabilities, as well as qualified surviving spouses of service 

members killed in action.
85

We note that the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) required the Department of 

Defense to carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility 

and advisability of permitting enlisted members of the armed 

forces to obtain civilian credentialing or licensing for skills 

required for military occupational specialties or qualification 

for duty specialty codes. The Department recently successfully 

completed the initial phase which had selected five civilian 

occupations for the pilot, which included aircraft mechanics, 

automotive mechanics, healthcare support, logistics and supply, 

and truck drivers. These occupations were chosen because the 

labor market outlook projects medium to high wages, high 

employment, and significant growth for civilian jobs in these 

occupations. As a result of the initial results, the Department 

recommends continuing and expanding the pilot program, expanding 

credentialing opportunities to military occupational codes in 

law enforcement, and including greater participation by the 

reserve components as well as wounded, ill, or injured service 

members.

Mortgage protection for members of the Armed Forces, surviving 

spouses, and certain veterans and other improvements to the 

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 556) that would 

amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 501 et 

seq.) to enhance mortgage protections under that Act for service 

members, surviving spouses, and certain veterans.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Department of Defense recognition of dependents of members of 

the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 557) that would 

amend chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

design of a dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, approved 

by the Secretary of Defense, to identify and recognize the 

dependent of a member of the armed forces who is serving or has 

served in a combat zone for a period of more than 30 days.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that section 901(b) of title 36, United States 

Code, authorizes the wearing of a service lapel button approved 

by the Secretary of Defense by the immediate family of an 
86

individual serving in the armed forces of the United States 

during any period of war or hostilities in which the armed 

forces of the United States are engaged.

Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of Junior 

Reserve Officers’ Training Corps Program

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 561) that would 

amend section 2031(a) of title 10, United States Code, to 

authorize the Secretary of a military department to establish 

and maintain a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training 

Corps at a secondary education institution in the Freely 

Associated States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Requirement to continue provision of tuition assistance for 

members of the Armed Forces

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 568) that would 

require the service secretaries to fund tuition assistance 

programs at appropriated levels for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

Internet access for members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and 

Marine Corps serving in combat zones

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 569) that would 

require the secretaries of the military departments to ensure 

that members of the armed forces deployed in an area for which 

imminent danger pay or hazardous duty pay is authorized have 

reasonable access to the Internet. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and 

transition of military dependent students

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 572) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to make grants to non-profit 

organizations that provide services to improve the academic 

achievement of military dependent students, including those 

organizations whose programs focus on improving the civic 
87

responsibility of military dependent students and their 

understanding of the Federal Government through direct exposure 

to government operations.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

Fraudulent representations about receipt of military decorations 

or medals

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 581) that would 

amend title 18, United States Code, to make fraudulently 

claiming to be a recipient of certain decorations or medals with 

the intent to obtain money, property, or other tangible benefits 

a crime. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that this provision has already been enacted in the 

Stolen Valor Act of 2013 (Public Law 113-12).

Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 586) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Army to award the Army Combat 

Action Badge to a person who, while a member of the Army, 

participated in combat during which the person personally 

engaged, or was personally engaged by, the enemy at any time 

during the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on 

September 18, 2001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal 

of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 587) that would 

require the Secretary of the Navy to submit a report on the Navy 

review, findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor 

nomination of Sergeant Rafael Peralta to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Required gold content for Medal of Honor 
88

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 589) that would 

require the metal content of the Medal of Honor to be 90 percent 

gold and 10 percent alloy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Consideration of Silver Star Award nominations

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590) that would 

require the Secretary of the Army to consider the nominations 

for the Silver Star Award, as previously submitted, for retired 

Master Sergeants Michael McElhiney, Ronnie Raikes, Gilbert 

Magallanes, and Staff Sergeant Wesley McGirr. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We are aware of the errors contained in the Valor Awards 

Database established by the Department of Defense in July 2012. 

These errors led to confusion regarding individuals whose names 

appear on the database as having earned a particular award for 

valor but have never received such award. We expect the 

Department of Defense and the military services to review their 

procedures for validating the information contained in the Valor 

Awards Database to eliminate the possibility of clerical errors 

in the future.

Report on Army review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal 

of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590A) that would 

require the Secretary of the Army to submit to the Committee on 

Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report 

pertaining to the Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William 

L. Albracht. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary Issues

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 593) that would 

establish a commission to study whether the Department of 

Defense mechanisms for disciplinary action adequately address 

the impact of service-connected mental disorders and traumatic 

brain injury on the basis for the disciplinary action. 
89

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Commission on Service to the Nation 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 594) that would 

establish the Commission on Service to the Nation to study the 

effect of warfare on service members, their families, and their 

communities; the outgoing experience and transition between 

military and civilian life; and the gaps between the military 

and those Americans who do not participate directly in the 

military community.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall provide 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives a comprehensive listing of Department of 

Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs programs that address 

(1) the effect of warfare, focusing on recent wars and 

conflicts, on members of the armed forces, the families of 

members of the armed forces, and the communities of members of 

the armed forces; (2) the outgoing experience and transition 

between military and civilian life; and (3) the gaps between the 

military and those Americans who do not participate directly in 

the military community.

Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains of 

certain members of the Armed Forces killed in Thurston Island, 

Antarctica

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 598) that would 

express the sense of Congress that the remains of service 

members killed at Thurston Island, Antarctica should be 

recovered and repatriated.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

TITLE VI–COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL 

BENEFITS

Subtitle A–Pay and Allowances
90

Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of 

basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances (sec. 

601)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 601) that would 

extend for 1 year the authority of the Secretary of Defense to 

temporarily increase the rate of basic allowance for housing in 

areas impacted by natural disasters or experiencing a sudden 

influx of personnel.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 603).

The agreement includes this provision.

Recognition of additional means by which members of the National 

Guard called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or 

less may initially report for duty for entitlement to basic pay 

(sec. 602)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 602) that would 

amend section 204(c) of title 37, United States Code, to provide 

additional means by which members of the National Guard called 

into federal service for a period of 30 days or less may become 

entitled to basic pay by including the date on which a member 

contacts their unit through authorized telephonic or electronic 

means.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 602) that would repeal section 204(c) of title 37, United 

States Code.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment.

Subtitle B–Bonuses and Special and 

Incentive Pays

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities 

for reserve forces (sec. 611)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 611) that would 

extend for 1 year the authority to pay the Selected Reserve 

reenlistment bonus, the Selected Reserve affiliation or 

enlistment bonus, special pay for enlisted members assigned to 

certain high-priority units, the Ready Reserve enlistment bonus 

for persons without prior service, the Ready Reserve enlistment 

and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service, the 

Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons 

with prior service, reimbursement of travel expenses for 
91

inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance, and 

income replacement for reserve component members experiencing 

extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 611). 

The agreement includes the House provision.

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities 

for health care professionals (sec. 612)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 612) that would 

extend for 1 year the authority to pay the nurse officer 

candidate accession bonus, education loan repayment for certain 

health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve, 

accession and retention bonuses for psychologists, the accession 

bonus for registered nurses, incentive special pay for nurse 

anesthetists, special pay for Selected Reserve health 

professionals in critically short wartime specialties, the 

accession bonus for dental officers, the accession bonus for 

pharmacy officers, the accession bonus for medical officers in 

critically short wartime specialties, and the accession bonus 

for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime 

specialties.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 612).

The agreement includes this provision.

One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for 

nuclear officers (sec. 613)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 613) that would 

extend for 1 year the authority to pay the special pay for 

nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service, 

the nuclear career accession bonus, and the nuclear career 

annual incentive bonus.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 613).

The agreement includes this provision.

One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 

consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities 

(sec. 614)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 614) that would 

extend for 1 year the general bonus authority for enlisted 

members, the general bonus authority for officers, special bonus 

and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers, special 
92

aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers, and 

special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in 

health professions. The provision would also extend for 1 year 

the authority to pay hazardous duty pay, assignment or special 

duty pay, skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus, and 

retention incentives for members qualified in critical military 

skills or assigned to high priority units.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 614).

The agreement includes this provision.

One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other 

title 37 bonuses and special pays (sec. 615)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 615) that would 

extend for 1 year the authority to pay the aviation officer 

retention bonus, assignment incentive pay, the reenlistment 

bonus for active members, the enlistment bonus, the accession 

bonus for new officers in critical skills, the incentive bonus 

for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease 

personnel shortage, the incentive bonus for transfer between 

armed forces, and the accession bonus for officer candidates.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 615).

The agreement includes this provision.

One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for 

members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language 

proficiency (sec. 616)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 616) that would 

extend for 1 year the authority to provide incentive pay for 

members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language 

proficiency.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen 

enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (sec. 

617)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 617) that would 

create a new section 336 in title 37, United States Code, to 

authorize a bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in 

the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 
93

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment.

Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned 

officers in the reserve components (sec. 618)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 617) that would amend section 16201(d) of title 10, United 

States Code, to authorize payment of the health professions 

stipend to a nurse enrolled in an accredited program of nursing 

in a specialty designated as critical by the Secretary of 

Defense who is eligible for appointment as a Reserve officer in 

any of the reserve components.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require all individuals receiving stipends 

under the authority of section 16201 of title 10, United States 

Code, to agree to serve in the Selected Reserve for 1 year for 

each 6 months for which the stipend is provided.

Subtitle C–Travel and Transportation 

Allowances

Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of Defense 

travel and transportation authorities in connection with reform 

of such authorities (sec. 621)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 631) that would amend sections 1040, 1074i, 1482, and 1491 

of title 10, United States Code, and sections 451 and 453 of 

title 37, United States Code, to make technical changes to those 

sections to conform with the travel consolidation reform enacted 

in sections 631 and 632 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81). The provision 

would also repeal sections 1036, 1053a, and 2634 of title 10, 

United States Code, as superseded.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical amendment.

Subtitle D–Disability, Retired Pay, and 

Survivor Benefits

Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the case 
94

of members whose retired pay is computed using high-three (sec. 

631)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 622) that would 

make a technical amendment to section 1401a of title 10, United 

States Code, to clarify that certain provisions of subsection 

(f) of that section do not apply to the computation of retired 

pay of members who first entered active duty on or after 

September 8, 1980.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 641).

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical amendment.

Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early 

retirement credit earned for significant periods of active 

Federal status or active duty (sec. 632)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 595) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to establish an electronic 

means by which members of the Ready Reserve could track 

qualifying service performed under section 12731(f)(2) of title 

10, United States Code.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 644) that would require the secretary concerned to 

periodically notify members of the Ready Reserve having 

performed qualifying duty under section 12731(f)(2) of title 10, 

United States Code, of their current eligibility age for retired 

pay by such means as the secretary concerned considers 

appropriate accounting for the cost of providing notice and the 

convenience of service members.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other dependents 

(sec. 633)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 643) that would amend sections 1450 and 1455 of title 10, 

United States Code, to authorize the payment of the Survivor 

Benefit Plan annuity to a special needs trust created under 

subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1396p(d)(4) of title 42, 

United States Code, for the sole benefit of a disabled dependent 

child incapable of self-support because of mental or physical 

incapacity.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

service secretaries to designate a military member or civilian 
95

employee to provide certain assistance to spouses and other 

dependents of service members who die on active duty.

We direct the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 

the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Health and 

Human Services, to assess the needs of Survivor Benefit Plan 

participants who have dependent children and spouses with 

special needs, and the feasibility and advisability of 

authorizing such participants to direct their annuity to a 

special needs trust for the benefit of the disabled child or 

spouse. The assessment should include a review of the number of 

dependents who would be potentially affected by such a change, 

the laws and regulations under which special needs trusts 

operate, and obstacles to efficient and transparent 

implementation of any such change, should the Secretary 

determine it is feasible and advisable. We direct the Secretary 

to submit the results of this review to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives by no 

later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle E–Commissary and Nonappropriated 

Fund Instrumentality Benefits and 

Operations

Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund 

instrumentalities from reprisals (sec. 641)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 631) that would 

amend section 1587(b) of title 10, United States Code, to align 

protections from reprisals for employees of nonappropriated fund 

instrumentalities with protections from reprisals for other 

Department of Defense civilian personnel.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1103). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund 

instrumentalities for purposes of certain civil service laws 

(sec. 642)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 633) that would 

amend section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, to remove 

the reference to Army and Air Force Motion Picture Service and 

Navy Ship’s Stores Ashore and replace it with the Navy Ships 

Stores Program in order to provide a more accurate and current 

definition of nonappropriated fund instrumentality employees.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 
96

provision (sec. 1108).

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical amendment.

Subtitle F—Other Matters

Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition 

of human remains that were retained by the Department of Defense 

for forensic pathology investigation (sec. 651)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 641) that would 

authorize the payment of certain expenses for the care and 

disposition of human remains retained by a service secretary 

pursuant to a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed 

Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of title 10, United 

States Code.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 671).

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Study of the merits and feasibility of providing transitional 

compensation and other transitional benefits to dependents of 

members separated for violation of the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice (sec. 652)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 621) that would 

establish a new section 1059a of title 10, United States Code, 

to authorize a monthly transitional compensation benefit for 

dependents of service members with more than 20 years of service 

who are convicted by court-martial of an offense under the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and who, as a result of 

the sentence of the court-martial, are separated from active 

duty and forfeit all pay and allowances.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to conduct a study regarding the merits and 

feasibility of providing transitional compensation benefits to 

dependents or former dependents of members of the armed forces 

who are convicted by court-martial under the UCMJ, and who, as a 

result of the sentence of the court-martial, are separated from 

active duty and forfeit all pays and allowances, and to report 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives on the results of that study by no later than 

180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted
97

Fiscal year 2014 increase in military basic pay

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 601) that would authorize an across-the-board pay raise 

for members of the uniformed services of 1 percent effective 

January 1, 2014.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that on August 30, 2013, the President transmitted 

to Congress an alternative pay plan establishing an across-theboard pay increase of 1 percent for members of the uniformed 

services for calendar year 2014 rather than the 1.8 percent that 

would otherwise have taken effect under current law.

Correction of citation for extension of reimbursement authority 

for travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal 

commuting distance and additional one-year extension

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 616) that would correct an erroneous citation in section 

611(7) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112-239) that extended authority to pay travel 

expenses for certain inactive-duty training outside of normal 

commuting distances. The provision would further extend the 

authority to December 31, 2014.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the technical correction contained in this 

section and further extension of authority appear elsewhere in 

this Act.

Purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and 

recyclable materials for resale in commissary and exchange store 

systems

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 632) that would 

require the governing body providing oversight and management 

direction to the military exchange and commissary systems to 

establish guidelines for the identification of fresh meat, 

poultry, seafood, produce, and other products raised or produced 

through sustainable methods. The provision would also require 

the governing body to establish, not later than September 30, 

2018, goals for all exchange and commissary stores to purchase 

sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable 

materials.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 
98

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Exchange store system participation in the Accord on Fire and 

Building Safety in Bangladesh 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 634) that would 

require the defense commissary system and the exchange store 

system comply with the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in 

Bangladesh and give preference to signatories to the Accord on 

Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. The Department of 

Defense must notify Congress of garments sold in defense 

commissaries or exchanges that are manufactured in Bangladesh by 

manufacturers who are not signatories to the Accord on Fire and 

Building Safety in Bangladesh. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision.

Effect on division of retired pay of election to receive combatrelated special compensation after previous election to receive 

concurrent retirement and disability compensation

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 642) that would amend section 1414 of title 10, United 

States Code, to clarify the effect of an election to receive 

combat-related special compensation (CRSC) after a previous 

election to receive concurrent retirement and disability 

compensation (CRDP) was made relative to the division of retired 

pay under section 1408 of title 10, United States Code.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We understand that a retiree’s decision to receive CRSC may 

have significant consequences on a former spouse who has been 

receiving a division of retired pay, including a division of 

CRDP. Such a decision can leave a former spouse with a sizable 

debt to the Federal Government for the past divisions of CRDP 

already paid. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) 

has the authority to waive those debts upon application. We 

expect DFAS to waive those debts relative to past divisions of 

CRDP when requested, and to make retirees, spouses, and former 

spouses aware of their options in seeking debt forgiveness in 

this circumstance.

Provision of status under law by honoring certain members of the 

reserve components as veterans
99

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 642) that would 

add a new section 107A to title 38, United States Code, to honor 

as a veteran any person entitled to retired pay for nonregular 

service under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, or 

who, but for age, would be entitled to such retired pay.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

Survey of military pay and benefits preferences

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 643) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to carry out an anonymous 

survey of random service members regarding military pay and 

benefit preferences.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

Transportation on military aircraft on a space-available basis 

for disabled veterans with a service-connected, permanent 

disability rated as total

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 644) that would 

amend section 2641b of title 10, United States Code, to require 

the Secretary of Defense to provide space-available travel on 

military aircraft to veterans with service-connected, permanent 

disabilities rated as total.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the Under Secretary of Defense for 

Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics issued a letter, dated 

November 12, 2013, acknowledging the authority provided by 

section 622 of the National Defense Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112-239), regarding the space-available 

transportation program. The Department is currently conducting 

a detailed review of the program, to include the authorities 

established under section 622, and will update the appropriate 

regulatory issuances upon completion.

Preservation of retiree dependent status for certain dependents 

upon death or permanent incapacitation of the retired member on 

whom dependent status is based

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 645) that would amend section 1060b of title 10, United 
100

States Code, to clarify that no further certification of a 

dependent for financial support shall be required or carried out 

in the case of a dependent who has been granted a permanent 

identification card by reason of permanent disability when the 

member or retiree providing the basis for dependency dies or 

becomes permanently incapacitated.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Enhanced role for the Department of Justice under the Military 

Lending Act

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 661) that would amend section 987 of title 10, United 

States Code, to provide civil enforcement authority over the 

Military Lending Act (MLA) to the Department of Justice.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We remain concerned about reports that predatory lenders 

continue to prey on service members and their families using 

forms of credit designed specifically to evade coverage of the 

MLA under the rules promulgated by the Department of Defense. 

We strongly encourage agencies with either explicit or implied 

enforcement authority over the MLA to enforce the MLA to the 

maximum extent possible. In the conference report accompanying 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112-239), the conferees expressed concern over the 

evolution of these predatory products and practices since 2006. 

The conferees thus directed the Secretary of Defense to review 

the evolution of predatory products and practices since 2006 and 

“to determine if changes to rules implementing section 987 are 

necessary to protect covered borrowers from continuing and 

evolving predatory lending practices, and to report to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of 

Representatives” by January 2, 2014, on the results of this 

review. In furtherance of this effort, the Department issued an 

advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on June 17, 2013. We 

expect the Department to issue its report by the end of the year 

together with new rules implementing the MLA that will address 

lending products crafted to evade coverage under existing MLA 

regulations, and all agencies with enforcement powers over the 

MLA to exercise those powers under these new rules to protect 

service members and their families from predatory lending 

practices.

Extension of ongoing pilot programs under temporary Army 

incentive to provide additional recruitment incentives
101

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 672) that would amend section 681 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109-163) to 

authorize the Secretary of the Army to continue through December 

31, 2015, any pilot program carried out under that section that 

was ongoing as of December 31, 2012.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

TITLE VII–HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

Subtitle A-TRICARE and Other Health Care 

Benefits

Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries 

enrolled in TRICARE Prime (sec. 701)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 711) that would 

authorize a one-time opt-in to TRICARE Prime for beneficiaries 

who were eligible for TRICARE Prime as of September 30, 2013, 

provided the beneficiary remains in the same ZIP code as the ZIP 

code the beneficiary resided in at the time of the opt-in, 

notwithstanding eligibility for enrollment based on the location 

at which the beneficiary resides. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 

that would authorize a beneficiary who was enrolled in TRICARE 

Prime as of September 30, 2013, to make a one-time election to 

continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime, notwithstanding 

eligibility for enrollment based on the location at which the 

beneficiary resides, provided the beneficiary remains in the 

same ZIP code as the ZIP code the beneficiary resided in at the 

time of the opt-in, and the beneficiary lives within 100 miles 

of a military medical treatment facility. The amendment would 

also clarify that the Secretary may determine whether to 

maintain a TRICARE network of providers in an area that is 

between 40 and 100 miles of a military medical treatment 

facility.

Mental health care treatment through telemedicine (sec. 702)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 704) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to extend coverage of the 

Transitional Assistance Management Program (TAMP) to individuals 
102

by an additional 180 days for treatment provided through 

telemedicine. The provision would also require the Secretary to 

extend coverage under TAMP for behavioral health services 

provided through telemedicine for certain individuals for an 

indefinite period of time. This authority would terminate on 

December 31, 2018.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to 

extend TAMP coverage for certain individuals for an additional 

180 days for mental health care provided through telemedicine. 

If the Secretary chooses to extend such coverage, the amendment 

would require the Secretary to report to the congressional 

defense committees on the rates of utilization of this coverage, 

the types of mental health care provided, and an analysis of how 

the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

coordinate the continuation of care for veterans who are no 

longer eligible for TAMP. This authority would terminate on 

December 31, 2018. The amendment would also require the 

Secretary of Defense, not later than 270 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees on the use of telemedicine to 

improve the diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic stress 

disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and mental health 

conditions.

Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of 

members of the Armed Forces with urotrauma (sec. 703)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 705) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to, not later than January 1, 2014, jointly develop and 

implement a comprehensive policy on improvements to the care, 

management, and transition of recovering service members with 

urotrauma. The provision would also require the secretaries to 

develop the policy in consultation with the heads of other 

appropriate federal agencies, representatives of military 

service organizations, and nongovernmental organizations.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to, not later than 180 days after 

the enactment of this Act, jointly develop and implement a 

comprehensive policy on improvements to the care, management, 

and transition of recovering service members with urotrauma. 
103

In developing the comprehensive policy, we encourage the 

Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 

consult with the heads of other appropriate departments and 

agencies of the Federal Government, representatives of military 

service organizations representing the interests of service 

members who are urotrauma patients, and appropriate 

nongovernmental organizations with expertise in matters relating 

to urotrauma. 

Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the 

Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic 

stress disorder (sec. 704)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 733) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a 5-year pilot 

program to establish a process to provide payment for 

investigational treatments of traumatic brain injury (TBI) or 

post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for service members in 

health care facilities other than military treatment facilities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to carry 

out a pilot program under which the Secretary establishes a 

process for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of 

investigational treatments of TBI or PTSD for service members in 

health care facilities other than military treatment facilities. 

The authority to carry out the pilot program would terminate on 

December 31, 2018.

Subtitle B-Health Care Administration

Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to 

enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to other 

nonprofit entities (sec. 711)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 722) that would 

clarify the authority of the Secretary of Defense, with regard 

to the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, to 

enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to nonprofit 

entities.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements 

in military medical treatment facilities (sec. 712)
104

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 714) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the 

service secretaries, to carry out a pilot program to assess the 

feasibility of using revenue-cycle management processes, 

including cash-flow management and accounts-receivable 

processes, for medical payment collection at military medical 

treatment facilities. The provision would also require the 

Secretary to submit a report on the pilot program not later than 

180 days after completion of the program, as well as a report on 

the current methods employed by the military departments to 

collect charges from third-party payers incurred at military 

medical treatment facilities not later than 180 days after the 

enactment of this Act.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 711).

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense, in 

coordination with the service secretaries, to carry out a pilot 

program to assess the feasibility of using commerciallyavailable enhanced recovery practices for medical payment 

collection, including revenue-cycle management together with 

rates and percentages of collection in accordance with industry 

standards, for medical payment collection at military medical 

treatment facilities. The amendment would also require the 

Secretary to submit a report on the pilot program not later than 

180 days after completion of the program.

Electronic health records of the Department of Defense and the 

Department of Veterans Affairs (sec. 713)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 734) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to implement an integrated electronic health record to 

be used by each of the secretaries, by not later than October 1, 

2016. The provision would also prescribe design principles, 

technical objectives, activities, and milestones that must be 

met and require the secretaries to jointly develop and submit to

the appropriate congressional committees a programs plan for the 

oversight and execution of the integrated electronic health 

record program. In addition, the provision would limit funding 

for the integrated electronic health record until programs plan 

and certification requirements are completed. The provision 

would also require the secretaries to jointly establish an 

advisory panel to support the development and validation of 

requirements, programmatic assessment, and other actions with 

respect to the integrated electronic health record.
105

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 712) that would express the sense of the Senate that: (1) 

Despite years of effort and the expenditure of significant 

resources, full electronic interoperability between the health 

record systems of the Department of Defense and the Department 

of Veterans Affairs has not yet been achieved; (2) The Secretary 

of Defense, in collaboration with the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs, should fully staff the Interagency Program Office and 

establish challenging, but achievable, deadlines for development 

and implementation of measures and goals for electronic health 

record interoperability; and (3) The Interagency Program Office 

should establish a secure, remote, and network-accessible 

computer storage system. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that the departments’ 

electronic health record systems are interoperable with 

integrated display of data, or a single electronic health 

record, and that each complies with national standards and 

architectural requirements. The provision would require each 

department to deploy modernized electronic health record 

software supporting clinicians by no later than December 31, 

2016. The provision would also prescribe design principles, 

technical objectives, activities, and milestones that must be 

met, as well as suggest design elements for the secretaries to 

consider. The amendment would require the secretaries to 

prepare and brief the appropriate congressional committees with 

a programs plan for the oversight and execution of the 

interoperable electronic health records with integrated display 

of data, or single electronic health record, and would limit 

funding for the records or record until the programs plan is 

submitted. The amendment would require the secretaries to 

jointly establish an executive committee to support the 

development and validation of adopted standards, required 

architectural platforms and structure, and the capacity to 

enforce them. 

In addition, the amendment would require the Secretary of 

Defense to request the Defense Science Board to conduct an 

annual review of the progress of the Secretary of Defense in 

achieving the mandates prescribed by the amendment. The 

amendment would also require the Secretary of Defense to 

complete the implementation of the Healthcare Artifact and Image 

Management Solution (HAIMS) program not later than 180 days 

after the enactment of this Act and, upon completion of such 

implementation, to provide a report to the appropriate 

congressional committees describing the extent of the 

interoperability between HAIMS and the Veterans Benefit 
106

Management System of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Subtitle C-Reports and Other Matters

Display of budget information for embedded mental health 

providers of the reserve components (sec. 721)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 721) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress, as a 

part of the documentation that supports the President’s annual 

budget for the Department of Defense, a budget justification 

display for embedded mental health providers within each reserve 

component, including the amount requested for each reserve 

component.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in certain 

Centers of Excellence (sec. 722)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 729) that would 

require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, not later than 60 

days after the enactment of this Act, to report to the 

Committees on Armed Services and Veterans Affairs of the House 

of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services and 

Veterans Affairs of the Senate, on the centers of excellence in 

the prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, and 

rehabilitation of: traumatic brain injury; post-traumatic stress 

disorder and other mental health conditions; and military eye 

injuries established under sections 1621, 1622, and 1623, of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 

Law 110-181).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, not later 

than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, to report to the 

Committees on Armed Services and Veterans Affairs of the House 

of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services and 

Veterans Affairs of the Senate on the centers of excellence in 

the prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, and 

rehabilitation of: traumatic brain injury; post-traumatic stress 

disorder and other mental health conditions; and military eye 

injuries established under sections 1621, 1622, and 1623, of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 

Law 110-181). The amendment would also require the Secretary to 
107

report on the center of excellence in prevention, diagnosis, 

mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of hearing loss and 

auditory system injuries established under section 721 of the 

Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2009 (Public Law 110-417), as well as the center of excellence 

in the mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of traumatic 

extremity injuries and amputations established under section 723 

of Public Law 110-417.

Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries (sec. 

723)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 732) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report on how the Secretary will identify, 

refer, and treat traumatic brain injuries with respect to 

service members who served in Operation Enduring Freedom or 

Operation Iraqi Freedom before the effective date in June 2010 

of the directive type memorandum regarding using a 50-meter 

distance from an explosion as a criterion to properly identify, 

refer, and treat members for potential traumatic brain injury.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary 

identifies, refers, and treats traumatic brain injuries with 

respect to service members who served in Operation Enduring 

Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom before the effective date in 

June 2010 of directive type memorandum 09-033 regarding using a 

50-meter distance from an explosion as a criterion to properly 

identify, refer, and treat members for potential traumatic brain 

injury.

Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans (sec. 724)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 721) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to report, not later than 180 days 

after the enactment of this Act, on the plans of the Department 

of Defense (DOD) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to 

ensure that the most clinically appropriate prosthetics and 

orthotics are made available to injured service members and 

veterans using technological advances as appropriate.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 
108

that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs to report, not later than 180 days after the 

enactment of this Act, on the plans of the DOD and VA to ensure 

that the most clinically appropriate prosthetics and orthotics 

are made available to injured service members and veterans using 

technological advances as appropriate; and to include a 

description of the processes of each Secretary to coordinate and 

identify care in the VA for an injured service member who, prior 

to being discharged or released from the armed forces, has an 

advanced technology prosthetic.

Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit program 

and availability of compounded pharmaceuticals (sec. 725)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 735) that would 

require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report, not later than 

180 days after the enactment of this Act, that evaluates the 

similarities and differences in the approaches to identifying 

and recovering improper payments across Medicare and TRICARE. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 

that would require the Comptroller General of the United States 

to submit to the congressional defense committees a report, not 

later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

that evaluates the similarities and differences of Medicare and 

the TRICARE program with respect to identifying and recovering 

improper payments. The amendment would also require the 

Comptroller General to submit a report not later than September 

30, 2014, to the congressional defense committees on the 

availability of compounded pharmaceuticals in the military 

health care system.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 701) that would 

amend section 1074m of title 10, United States Code, to require 

the Secretary of Defense to provide person-to-person mental 

health assessments once during each 180-day period during which 

a service member is deployed.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that each of the military departments has embedded 
109

behavioral health care providers in certain operational and 

deployable units whose purpose is to provide increased access to 

behavioral health care for service members in theater.

Periodic mental health assessments for members of the Armed 

Forces

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 702) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to provide periodic person-toperson mental health assessments to each member of the armed 

forces serving on active duty.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities under 

TRICARE

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 703) that would 

amend section 1077 of title 10, United States Code, to authorize 

behavioral health treatment, including applied behavior analysis 

therapy, for all developmental disabilities as defined by 

section 15002(8) of title 42, United States Code, including 

autism spectrum disorders, when prescribed by a physician to be 

covered under the basic TRICARE program for certain 

beneficiaries.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Cooperative health care agreements between the military 

departments and non-military health care entities

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 712) that would 

authorize the secretaries of the military departments to 

establish cooperative health care agreements between military 

installations and local or regional non-military health care 

entities.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

We note that the Secretary of Defense was provided the 

authority to enter into cooperative health care agreements under 

section 713 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note), and that the Secretary may

delegate this authority. We believe that in circumstances where 

the Secretary deems it appropriate, the Secretary should utilize 
110

or delegate this authority.

Limitation on availability of funds for integrated electronic 

health record program

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 713) that would 

limit the amount of funds the Secretary of Defense may obligate 

or expend for procurement or research, development, test and 

evaluation for the integrated electronic health record program 

until 30 days after the date that the Secretary submits a report 

detailing an analysis of alternatives for the plan.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Mental health support for military personnel and families

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 723) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to carry out collaborative 

programs to: respond to suicide and combat stress-related arrest 

rates of service members; train active-duty members to recognize 

and respond to combat stress disorder, suicide risk, substance 

addiction, risk-taking behaviors, and family violence; and 

determine the effectiveness of Department of Defense (DOD) 

efforts to reduce military suicide rates.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that in December 2012, the Drug Enforcement 

Administration (DEA) published in the Federal Register a Notice 

of Proposed Rulemaking to implement the Secure and Responsible 

Drug Disposal Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–273). We believe that 

the proposed rule severely hampers DOD efforts to collect and 

safely dispose of unused prescription drugs. The Assistant 

Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs has expressed concern 

that DEA’s proposed rule will “limit DOD’s ability to accept 

unused patient medications in a routine setting and reduce the 

potential effectiveness of efforts to eliminate opportunities 

for medication misuse, abuse and tragic adverse events.” We 

understand that the DEA has been in discussions with the 

Department to develop workable, accessible, readily-available 

means for service members, retirees, and their dependents to 

dispose of unused or unwanted controlled substances efficiently, 

but we are discouraged that substantial progress has not yet 

been made. We expect that the DEA’s final rule, once published, 

will provide the Department with the means to establish a 

meaningful drug take-back program for its beneficiaries to 
111

reduce prescription drug misuse, abuse and potential tragic 

adverse events.

Research regarding hydrocephalus

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 724) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense, in conducting the Peer 

Reviewed Medical Research Program, to consider selecting medical 

research projects relating to hydrocephalus.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We encourage the Secretary of Defense to consider including 

medical research on hydrocephalus in Department of Defense 

research efforts.

Traumatic brain injury research

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 725) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to carry out research, 

development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to 

traumatic brain injury and psychological health, including 

activities regarding drug development to halt neurodegeneration 

following traumatic brain injury.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Increased collaboration with NIH to combat triple negative 

breast cancer

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 727) that would 

require the Department of Defense to work in collaboration with 

the National Institutes of Health to identify specific genetic 

and molecular targets and biomarkers for triple negative breast 

cancer and to provide information that will enable triple 

negative breast cancer patients to be identified earlier and aid 

the development of therapies for the disease.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We urge the Secretary of Defense to consider conducting 

research to identify specific genetic and molecular targets and 

biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer.

Sense of Congress on mental health counselors for members of the 

Armed Forces and their families
112

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 728) that would 

express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense 

should develop a plan to ensure a sustainable flow of qualified 

counselors to meet the long-term needs of service members and 

their families for counselors, to include the participation of 

accredited schools and universities, health care providers, 

professional counselors, family service or support centers, 

chaplains, and other appropriate Department of Defense 

resources. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Preliminary mental health assessments

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 730) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to provide a mental health 

assessment to any individual enlisting or being commissioned as 

an officer in the armed forces prior to such enlistment or 

commissioning, and to use the results of such an assessment as a 

baseline for any subsequent mental health examinations.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Sense of Congress on the traumatic brain injury plan

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 731) that would 

express the sense of Congress that section 739(b) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112-239) requires the Secretary of Defense, not later than 

180 days after the enactment of such Act, to submit a plan to 

Congress to improve the coordination and integration of 

Department of Defense programs that address traumatic brain 

injury and the psychological health of service members, and that 

the Secretary should deliver the report within the required time 

frame.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We expect the Secretary of Defense to submit the plan 

required by section 739(b) to the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives as soon as 

possible.
113

TITLE VIII–ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION 

MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED MATTERS

Subtitle A–Acquisition Policy and 

Management

Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of 

Defense laboratories (sec. 801)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 802) that would 

establish a pilot program to allow Department of Defense (DOD) 

laboratories to license DOD-owned intellectual property that may 

or may not be patented, and to retain associated royalties 

consistent with existing statues on patent licensing.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for 

contract services (sec. 802)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 803) that would 

extend limitations on contract services under section 808 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public 

Law 111-84), through 2015.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would extend the provision for 1 year.

Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts 

(sec. 803)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 812) that would 

amend section 818 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) to expand the conditions 

under which covered contractors can qualify for exemption from 

strict liability associated with rework and corrective action 

related to counterfeits of obsolete electronic parts.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would require the Department to work with contractors or other 

sources of supply to identify obsolete parts and replace them 
114

through an expedited engineering change process.

Subtitle B-Amendments to General 

Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 

Limitations

Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor 

compensation (sec. 811)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 813) that would 

amend section 2324(e)(1)(P) of title 10, United States Code, and 

section 4304(a) of title 41, United States Code, to replace the 

current statutory benchmark compensation formula used to 

determine the amount of contractor compensation that is 

considered an allowable cost for a federal contract, with the 

current compensation benchmark amount for fiscal year 2013 of 

$763,209. This section would also make unallowable the entire 

cost of compensation for the five most-highly compensated 

employees of a contractor that was awarded more than $500.0 

million in federal contracts in the previous fiscal year. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 841) that would reduce the cap on allowable 

costs of compensation of contractor employees to an amount 

consistent with the original legislative cap, adjusted for 

inflation, and provide for future annual adjustments by 

reflecting the change in the Employment Cost Index for all 

workers, as calculated by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics. 

According to this calculation, the cap for fiscal year 2014 

would be at $487,325.

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would revise the cap on compensation of contractor employees and 

provide for future annual adjustments.

Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain 

reports (sec. 812)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 814) that would 

amend section 2432 of title 10, United States Code, to require 

that the program’s baseline cost estimate, along with the 

associated risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate be 

provided in the quarterly selected acquisition reports. In 

addition, this section would require that the reports include 

the current point estimate bounded by the low-end and high-end 

estimates and the associated sensitivity of those estimates, and 

identification of the primary risk parameters associated with 

the estimate. Furthermore, this section would require reporting 
115

of estimated termination liability remaining on the contract. 

Finally, this section would amend section 2334(f) of title 10, 

United States Code, to require the Director, Cost Assessment and 

Program Evaluation, to review the information required by this 

section and to include trend information, a summary of findings 

and recommendations to improve the cost estimates of the 

Department of Defense in the annual report to Congress on cost 

assessment activities.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a technical 

amendment. We encourage the Secretary of Defense to include at 

least three programs designated as Acquisition Category I 

programs in the December 2014 reporting period. 

Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension 

or debarment (sec. 813)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 815) that would 

amend section 2393(b) of title 10, United States Code, by 

requiring the Secretary of Defense to make available on a 

publicly accessible website any determination that there is a 

compelling reason to solicit an offer from, award a contract to, 

extend a contract with, or approve a subcontract with an offeror 

or contractor that has been debarred or suspended by a federal 

agency.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a technical 

amendment.

Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose 

nondevelopmental items (sec. 814)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 831) that would 

amend section 866 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383), by extending the program 

authority to December 31, 2019. Furthermore, the committee 

encouraged the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics to review the military purpose nondevelopmental items implementation guidance and to exercise the 

authority provided in section 866.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision.
116

Subtitle C-Provisions Relating to Major 

Defense Acquisition Programs

Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense 

acquisition programs (sec. 821)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 821) that as part of a milestone B decision for a major 

defense acquisition program, would require that there be a plan 

in place to mitigate and account for costs in connection with 

decertification of cryptographic equipment during production and 

procurement of the system. The provision includes a waiver 

based on national security needs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that changes the date of applying this provision to 6 

months after the date of enactment.

Assessment of dedicated ground control system before Milestone B 

approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting a 

space program (sec. 822)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 822) that would implement a recommendation from the 

Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, Satellite Control 

Operations, GAO–13–315, concerning the use of dedicated 

satellite control systems.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that modified title 10, United States Code, and 

requires the Secretary of Defense to develop a long-term plan 

for satellite ground control systems. The plan must be 

submitted to the congressional defense committees 1 year after 

the date of enactment.

We expect that the cost-benefit analysis be based on lifecycle cost estimates found within the DOD 5000 directive and 

instructions.

The Comptroller General of the United States shall review 

the implementation plan and submit its views no later than 90 

days after the plan is submitted to the congressional defense 

committees.

Additional responsibility for product support managers for major 

weapon systems (sec. 823)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 
117

(sec. 823) that would amend section 2337 of title 10, United 

States Code, and section 823 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239), to 

provide an assurance that all product support arrangements 

explicitly state how the arrangement will maximize use of 

government-owned inventory before obtaining inventory from 

commercial sources. This provision is a result of a Department 

of Defense Inspector General investigation into the Defense 

Logistics Agency.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a technical 

amendment.

Comptroller General review of Department of Defense processes 

for the acquisition of weapons systems (sec. 824) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 824) requiring the Comptroller General to carry out a 

comprehensive review of the processes and procedures of the 

Department of Defense for the acquisition of weapon systems. 

The objective of the review is to identify processes and 

procedures for the acquisition of weapon systems that provide 

little or no value or for which any value added is outweighed by 

cost or schedule delays without adding commensurate value. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement contains this provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

We direct the Comptroller General to provide the 

congressional defense committees with the required report no 

later than January 31, 2015. 

Subtitle D-Provisions Relating to Contracts 

in Support of Contingency Operations in 

Iraq or Afghanistan

Prohibition on contracting with the enemy (sec. 831)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 821) that would 

amend section 841 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81), regarding the authority of 

the Secretary of Defense to void a contract that is directly or 

indirectly funding a person or entity who actively supports an 

insurgency or otherwise actively opposes the United States or 

its coalition partners in a contingency operation in the United 

States Central Command theater of operations , to: (1) Lower the 

threshold for covered contracts from $0.1 million to $0.05 
118

million; (2) Provide the authority to certain other geographic 

combatant commands during a contingency operation as defined by 

section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code; and (3) Make 

the authority permanent.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 861) that would amend section 841 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public 

Law 112-81) by striking “the date that is three years after the 

date of the enactment of this Act” and inserting “December 31, 

2016.” 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an additional 

similar provision (section 862) that would expand section 841 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

(Public Law 112-81) to all combatant commanders.

The agreement contains that provision with an amendment 

that would amend section 841 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81), 

making the authorities provided in section 841 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-

81) available to certain other combatant commanders.

We intend that the definition of a “covered person or 

entity” would not mean a person or entity that is engaged in 

speech activities but rather actions involving hostile 

opposition to United States or coalition forces.

Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced 

in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan (sec. 

832)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 832) that would 

extend through December 31, 2015, the authority under section 

801 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2010 (Public Law 111-84), as amended, to procure products and 

services produced in countries along a major route of supply to 

Afghanistan. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 802). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Modification of reporting requirement for Department of Defense 

business system acquisition programs when initial operating 

capability is not achieved within 5 years of Milestone A 

approval 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 801) that would 
119

amend the reporting requirement imposed on defense business 

systems (DBS) acquisition programs by section 811 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public 

Law 109-364) by clarifying the separate treatment of Major 

Automated Information Systems (MAIS) DBS and non-MAIS DBS. 

Specifically, this section would clarify that section 811 is 

inapplicable to MAIS DBS acquisition programs because such 

programs are independently subject to critical change reporting 

under section 2445c of title 10, United States Code. This 

section would also modify the requirement for non-MAIS DBS 

reporting a failure to achieve initial operational capacity 

(IOC) within 5 years of milestone A approval from a critical 

change report to a report to the Department of Defense precertification authority explaining the causes and circumstances 

surrounding the failure to achieve IOC within the required time.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

Restatement and revision of requirements applicable to multiyear 

defense acquisitions to be specifically authorized by law 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 801) that would clarify and reorganize the reporting and 

certification requirements of the Department of Defense when 

requesting specific authorization for multiyear contract 

authority.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

Report on program manager training and experience 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 803) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit 

an updated version of the 2009 Department of Defense report 

titled: “OSD [Office of the Secretary of Defense] Study of 

Program Manager Training and Experience” not later than 120 days 

from enactment of this Act. 

The report found senior military officers, including 

general officers, and civilians in charge of acquisition 

programs did not believe their acquisition training was 

“sufficiently practical and comprehensive” regarding a number of 

fundamental areas of acquisition management. For example, the 

following is a partial list of responses showing the percent of 

program managers polled at that time who believed their 

acquisition training was sufficiently practical and 

comprehensive: 
120

Overseeing Contractor Performance 31%

Cost Estimating Challenges 27%

Software Management Challenges 25%

Cost Control Challenges 25%

Unexpected Cost Growth 14% 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not contain this provision.

We direct the Secretary of Defense to provide to the 

congressional defense committees a comprehensive update of the 

2009 report not later than 120 days after the date of enactment 

of this Act. 

The update should also identify, describe, and analyze 

trends in the training and experience of personnel acquisition 

program management since the issuance of the 2009 report, and 

should provide recommendations for improving the training and 

experience of personnel performing acquisition program 

management functions. 

We further direct the Secretary to specifically examine the 

training, qualifications, and experience of personnel performing 

acquisition program management functions on programs designated 

as Acquisition Category I, IA, and II and provide 

recommendations on the ways to improve the practicality and 

comprehensiveness of the acquisition training provided to such 

personnel. 

Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations relating 

to detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 811) that would

amend section 818 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) to provide that the costs 

associated with the use of counterfeit electronic parts, and the 

subsequent cost of rework or corrective action that may be 

required to remedy the use of inclusion of such parts, are 

allowable costs under Department of Defense contracts if the 

counterfeit electronic parts were procured from an original 

manufacturer or its authorized dealer, or from a trusted 

supplier.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain this provision.

Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government be 

given at least equal importance as technical or other criteria 

in evaluating competitive proposals for defense contracts 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 816) that would 
121

amend section 2305(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, to 

require that the head of an agency of the Department of Defense, 

in prescribing the evaluation factors to be included in each 

solicitation for competitive proposals, assign importance to 

cost or price at least equal to all evaluation factors other 

than cost or price when combined. This section would allow the 

head of an agency to waive the requirement, and it would require 

the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress, not later than 

180 days after the end of each fiscal year, a report containing 

a list of each waiver issued during the preceding fiscal year.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

The Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 15 permits the use 

of several best value competitive source selection 

techniques. Within the best value continuum, the government 

should utilize the technique that is most advantageous to its 

interests.

 The government may choose to use the lowest price 

technically acceptable source selection process for acquisitions 

in which best value can be expected to result from the selection 

of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated 

price. 

The government may also choose to use a trade-off source 

selection process for acquisitions in which it may be in the 

best interest of the government to grant an award to an offeror 

other than the lowest priced offeror or the highest technically 

rated offeror. In such cases, non-cost or price evaluation 

factors may be weighed against cost or price factors in 

competitive source selections.

We are concerned that best value competitive source 

selection processes are not always properly 

implemented. Therefore, we direct the Comptroller General of 

the United States to conduct a study on Department of Defense 

procurements that use best value competitive source selection 

techniques. The study shall include, at a minimum, an 

assessment of: 

(1) The frequency with which evaluation factors other 

than cost or price, when combined, are given more weight 

than cost or price in solicitations for competitive 

proposals;

(2) The types of contracts for products or services 

for which such evaluation factors are most frequently used;

(3) The reasons why the Department of Defense chooses 

to use such evaluation factors; 

(4) The extent to which the use of such factors is or 

is not in the interest of the Department of Defense;
122

(5) The efficacy with which the Department of 

Defense’s acquisition workforce implements best value 

competitive source selection techniques; 

(6) The Department of Defense’s guidance and 

directives on the appropriate use of best value competitive 

source selection techniques; and 

(7) The extent to which budgetary constraints affect 

the use of best value competitive source selection 

techniques.

 We direct the Comptroller General to submit to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives a report on the results of this study not later 

than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 817) that would 

amend section 2533a(b) of title 10, United States Code, to 

include “a flag of the United States of America” to the list of 

items that the Department of Defense may not procure unless the 

item is grown, processed, reused, or produced in the United 

States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

We note that flags of the United States procured by the 

Department of Defense are procured in accordance with section 

2533a(b)(1)(D) of title 10, United States Code. 

Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 822) that would 

amend section 861 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181), as amended, to allow 

contracts in Afghanistan entered into after the enactment of 

this Act to include a clause requiring the imposition of a 

penalty on any contractor that does not comply with the 

policies, guidance, or regulations issued pursuant to that 

section. This section would also amend section 863 of Public 

Law 110-181 to require that the Annual Joint Report on 

Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan include information on any 

penalties imposed on contractors for failing to comply with 

requirements under section 861(e) of Public Law 110-181.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

We are concerned about reports of contractor noncompliance 
123

with relevant policies, guidance, and regulations in 

Afghanistan, including contractor noncompliance with 

requirements to provide information for the common databases 

identified by section 861(b)(4) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181), as 

amended. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 

the Secretary of State and the Administrator for the United 

States Agency for International Development, to submit to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 

Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 

Representatives, not later than 180 days after enactment of this 

Act, a report on contractor compliance in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

At a minimum, the report shall include a detailed 

discussion of any outstanding contractor compliance issues or 

concerns, including any issues or concerns pertaining to the 

provision of information to common databases or the management 

thereof; a discussion of any lessons learned in Iraq or 

Afghanistan for improving contractor compliance in a contingency 

environment; and best practice recommendations for ensuring 

contractor compliance in future contingency contracting 

operations.

Report on procurement supply chain vulnerabilities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 833) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report regarding 

how sole source suppliers of components to the Department of 

Defense procurement supply chain creates vulnerabilities to 

military attack, terrorism, natural disaster, industrial shock, 

financial crisis, or geopolitical crisis, such as an embargo of 

key raw materials or industrial inputs.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

Study on the impact of contracting with veteran-owned small 

businesses 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 834) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report regarding 

impacts of the Department of Defense contracting with small 

businesses owned and controlled by veterans and service-disabled 

veterans on veteran entrepreneurship and unemployment; impact on 

veteran suicide and homelessness; and the feasibility and 

expected impacts of implementation of the small business goals 
124

and preferences detailed in section 8127, title 38, United 

States Code.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The provision does not contain the agreement.

Revisions to requirements relating to justification and approval 

of sole-source defense contracts 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 835) that would 

modify the provisions of the Department of Defense Supplement to 

the Federal Acquisition Regulation that implement section 811 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(Public Law 111-84), clarifying the delegable authority of the 

head of an agency to make an award. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

Revision of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition 

Regulation to take into account sourcing laws 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 837) that would 

revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal 

Acquisition Regulation to implement requirements imposed by 

sections 129, 129a, 2330a, 2461, and 2463 of title 10, United 

States Code.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

Prohibition on purchase of military coins not made in the United 

States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 838) that would 

prohibit the purchase of any military coins not produced in the 

United States.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

We note military coins are generally purchased with unitlevel morale funds or funds personally contributed by the 

members of the unit and not with appropriated funds. 

Compliance with domestic source requirements for footwear 

furnished to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their 

initial entry into the Armed Forces 
125

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 839) that would 

amend section 418 of title 37, United States Code, by requiring 

the Department of Defense to issue athletic footwear compliant 

with the requirement detailed in section 2533a of title 10, 

United States Code, to members of the Armed Forces upon their 

initial entry in lieu of a cash allowance.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

We note that Congress passed the Berry Amendment in 1941 to 

ensure that American soldiers train and operate, to the greatest 

extent practicable, in American-made materials. The Berry 

Amendment specifically covers footwear listed in Federal Supply 

Class 8430 or 8435. 

The Army, in 2001, and the Air Force, in 2008, have moved 

away from issuing athletic footwear to new recruits. Instead, 

new recruits are given an allowance to acquire athletic footwear 

from the service exchange.

During this period of time, no athletic footwear was 

available that could have met the requirements of the Berry 

Amendment without a waiver. It has been reported that at least 

one domestic contractor is now producing such footwear. 

Therefore, we direct the Under Secretary of Defense for 

Acquisition, Technology and Logistics to issue a Sources Sought 

to determine whether there are any domestic manufacturers of 

Berry Amendment-compliant athletic footwear that meets the 

Department’s requirements. 

We further direct that any responses to the Sources Sought 

be evaluated by the Defense Logistics Agency and an independent 

entity to determine whether (1) such offered athletic footwear 

meets the requirements of the Berry Amendment and (2) whether 

Department requirements are actually met. Such review should 

consider the various sizes and fits of athletic shoes offered, 

cost, and capacity of suppliers to meet military requirements.

Implementation by Department of Defense of certain 

recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States 

on oversight of pensions offered by Department contractors 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 842) that would require the Secretary of Defense to assign 

responsibility within the Department of Defense (DOD) for 

oversight of the reasonableness of the pension plans offered by 

Department contractors and issue certain guidance on pension 

benefits.

The House bill contained no similar provision.
126

The agreement does not contain the provision.

We note that, according to the Government Accountability 

Office (GAO), DOD contractors are among the largest sponsors of 

defined benefit pension plans in the United States and also 

factor pension costs into the price of DOD contracts. We also 

note that in its January 2013 report, GAO made the following 

recommendations to the Secretary of Defense in order to improve 

oversight, management, and accountability of such pension plans: 

(1) Assign responsibility within the DOD for oversight 

of the reasonableness of the pension plans offered by 

Department contractors, specifically the value of benefits 

earned by participants in such pension plans;

(2) Issue guidance on the measurement of the value of 

pension benefits that participants earn in a given year, in 

order to permit the Department to obtain a comprehensive 

understanding of the total compensation provided to 

employees by Department contractors;

(3) Issue guidance on the extent to which defined 

benefit pension plans will be included in assessments of 

the reasonableness of compensation for executives of 

Department contractors; and 

(4) Issue guidance for the acquisition organizations 

of the Department, including the Defense Contract 

Management Activity and Defense Contract Audit Activity, in 

regards to the discount rate or rates that are acceptable 

for Department contractors to use in calculating person 

costs for forward pricing purposes.

We are pleased that the Director, Defense Procurement and 

Acquisition Policy, concurred with all such recommendations in 

his January 2, 2013 response letter and note that he also 

expressed clear intent to implement them. However, we are 

concerned that according to GAO, all four recommendations are 

yet to be closed. Therefore, we encourage the Secretary of 

Defense to move expeditiously to close out implementation of the 

recommendations, and to keep the Committees on Armed Services of 

the Senate and the House of Representatives informed of the 

progress. 

Report on the elimination of improper payments 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 863) that would require the Secretary of Defense to report 

on the Department’s plan to implement the recommendations of the 

Comptroller General regarding the elimination of improper 

payments.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.
127

Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act 

The House bill contained a set of provisions (sec. 5001-

5506) that would increase the authority of Chief Information 

Officers (CIO) regarding information technology (IT) investment 

practices for the 16 major civilian agencies, including the 

Department of Defense. The purpose of these provisions was to 

increase efficiencies government-wide by streamlining the 

acquisition process, increasing transparency, eliminating 

duplication and waste, and strengthening public-private 

partnerships by empowering the CIO with greater responsibility 

for IT systems within a government agency.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the acquisition of information technology is a 

challenge across the Federal Government and that reform of the 

information technology acquisition process remains a priority in 

the defense committees and the Congress. We expect to continue 

working on improvements in this area and hope to bring a set of 

comprehensive reforms forward in the next fiscal year.

TITLE IX–DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION 

AND MANAGEMENT

Subtitle A–Department of Defense Management

Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business 

enterprise architecture (sec.901)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 902) that would 

revise the definition for legacy systems in section 2222 of 

title 10, United States Code, to align with the updated business 

systems investment review process.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does contain the provision.

Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal 

Government tenants onto military installations in the United 

States (sec. 902)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 904) that would 

require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a 

report to Congress regarding potential consolidation of federal 
128

agency facilities onto military installations, with specific 

consideration of installations that support Arctic missions.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment.

Clarification of authority for the command acquisition executive 

of the United States Special Operations Command (sec.903)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 902) that would make the U.S. Special Operations Command 

(USSOCOM) Acquisition Executive subject to the direction of the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and 

Logistics (USD(AT&L)). The provision would also require the 

USD(AT&L) to designate an appropriate official within the Office 

of the USD(AT&L) to provide such oversight and direction for 

those programs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would modify the provision to make clear that the 

USSOCOM Acquisition Executive is responsible to the Commander of 

USSOCOM for the acquisition of special operations-peculiar 

equipment and subordinate to the USD (AT&L) for all acquisition 

matters. The provision would not alter the relationship between 

the USSOCOM Acquisition Executive and the Commander of USSOCOM. 

Further, it is not the intent of the provision to delay, 

unnecessarily impede, or undermine the flexibility of USSOCOM 

development and acquisition efforts.

We remain supportive of USSOCOM’s unique acquisition 

authorities to provide for the special operations-peculiar 

requirements of its forces, including rapid acquisition of 

urgently needed capabilities for deployed or deploying special 

operations forces. Further, we note that the flexibility 

inherent in these authorities is important to ensuring that 

special operations forces can adapt to the rapidly evolving 

nature of global threats. However, given the significant growth 

in USSOCOM’s budget in recent years and current fiscal 

pressures, we believe it is necessary to clarify civilian 

oversight of USSOCOM investment programs, particularly the 

development and acquisition of special operations-peculiar 

platforms.

We note that the John Warner National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364), as amended, 

requires the Secretary of Defense to designate a senior 

acquisition official within USD (AT&L) to oversee the exercise 

of acquisition authority by USSOCOM, among others. 
129

Additionally, section 138 of title 10, United States Code, 

states that the “principal duty” of the Assistant Secretary of 

Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict (ASD 

SOLIC) is “overall supervision (including oversight of policy

and resources) of special operations activities.” We believe 

appropriate civilian oversight by USD (AT&L) and ASD SOLIC of 

USSOCOM acquisition activities is critical to ensuring effective 

use of taxpayer funds, particularly with regard to the 

development and acquisition of special operations-peculiar 

platforms and advanced technology programs that are at greatest 

risk of incurring delays and additional costs. Therefore, we 

direct the Secretary of Defense to provide the congressional 

defense committees, not later than 90 days after enactment of 

this act, a directive type memorandum outlining the respective 

roles and responsibilities of the USD (AT&L) and ASD SOLIC with 

regard to the oversight of USSOCOM acquisition activities and 

the mechanisms through which such oversight will occur.

Streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters 

(sec. 904)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 905) that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

develop a plan for streamlining Department of Defense management 

headquarters by reducing the size of staffs, eliminating tiers 

of management, cutting functions that provide little or no added 

value, and consolidating overlapping and duplicative program 

offices. The objective is to reduce aggregate spending for 

management headquarters by not less than $100.0 billion over a 

10 fiscal-year period beginning with fiscal year 2015.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would remove the savings objective from bill language. We note 

the Secretary of Defense’s recent announcement that he is 

seeking $40.0 billion in savings in these areas. We expect that 

the Secretary’s goal will be met.

We also note that section 113 of title 10, United States 

Code, requires the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress 

each year a report that contains a comprehensive net assessment 

of the defense capabilities and programs of the armed forces of 

the United States and its allies as compared with those of their 

potential adversaries.

We are concerned that in the course of a review intended to 

identify potential efficiencies and cost savings in the Office 

of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) the recommendation has been 

made to make the net assessment function subordinate to another 

OSD office. Such a change would risk compromising the 
130

independence of the Office of Net Assessment without achieving 

significant efficiencies. 

Accordingly, we direct the Secretary of Defense to provide 

to the congressional defense committees, not later than March 1, 

2014, a report that identifies the estimated savings and 

efficiencies that would be achieved through the reorganization 

or realignment of the Office of Net Assessment and explains how 

the Secretary of Defense would ensure the continuing 

independence of net assessment and the ability to report 

directly to the Secretary, in the event that a decision were 

made to modify the organizational structure or reporting 

arrangements of the office.

Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of 

the Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and 

education (sec. 905)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 906), as requested by the Department of Defense, that 

would codify the responsibility of the Chairman of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) by amending section 153 of title 10, 

United States Code, to reflect the current joint training, 

doctrine, education, and force development functions that are 

overseen by the CJCS.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Modification of reference to major Department of Defense 

headquarters activities instruction (sec. 906)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 907) that would amend section 194(f) of title 10, United 

States Code, to update the reference to Department of Defense 

Instruction 5100.73, titled “Major DOD Headquarters Activities.”

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement contains the provision.

Personnel security (sec. 907)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 931) that would require major reform of the personnel 

security clearance investigation, adjudication, and transfer 

processes to improve security and reduce costs. Specifically, 

the provision would require:

(1) The Director of Cost Analysis and Program 

Evaluation to conduct a comprehensive, comparative analysis 

of the cost, schedule, and performance of personnel 
131

security investigations acquired through the Office of 

Personnel Management (OPM) and through components of the 

Department of Defense (DOD);

(2) The Secretary of Defense to develop a plan by 

October 1, 2014, to acquire investigations through the 

approach most advantageous to DOD;

(3) The Secretary and the Director of National 

Intelligence (DNI) to develop a joint strategy to modernize 

all aspects of personnel security to lower costs and 

improve security, and to develop and report annually on 

metrics that will demonstrate progress in achieving those 

objectives;

(4) The Secretary and the DNI to consider, and allow 

them to adopt, a series of innovations in security 

investigation methods and data sources that have been shown 

to be effective through analysis and/or demonstrations;

(5) The Secretary and the DNI to ensure, to the 

maximum extent practicable, reciprocal acceptance of 

clearances; and

(6) Development of benchmarks by which to measure the 

current level of reciprocity in clearance transfers and the 

costs imposed by delays.

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would (1) include the Director of the Office of 

Management and Budget along with the Secretary of Defense and 

the DNI in the requirement to develop and implement a strategy 

to modernize the personnel security process; (2) require the 

Secretary and the Directors to consider the results of ongoing 

reviews occasioned by unauthorized disclosures of classified 

information and by the events at the Washington Navy Yard; (3) 

require the strategy to include a risk-based monitoring approach 

based on the responsibilities and accesses of cleared personnel; 

require the Comptroller General to conduct a review of the 

personnel security process; and require the Suitability and 

Security Performance Accountability Council to convene a task 

force to examine access to State and local public records of 

Federal Fovernment and contractor investigators.

Subtitle B–Space Activities

National security space satellite reporting policy (sec. 911)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 911) that would 

amend chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, to add a 

notification, required of the Secretary of Defense, of each 

attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a 
132

U.S. national security space capability. The notification shall 

be submitted to the appropriate congressional committees not 

later than 48 hours after the Secretary determines that there is 

reason to believe such an attempt occurred. Not later than 10 

days after the date on which the Secretary determines that there 

is reason to believe such an attempt occurred, further 

information should be provided including the name and a brief 

description of the national security space capability that was 

impacted by such an attempt; a description of the attempt, 

including the foreign actor, the date and time of the attempt, 

and any related capability outage and the mission impact of such 

outage; and any other information considered relevant by the 

Secretary.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that strikes the sense of Congress, provides that the 

Commander of U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM) provide the 

notice instead of the Secretary, and adds other information the 

Commander considers relevant to the notice.

We note that the notice is not intended to be a duplicative 

process and should leverage existing STRATCOM anomaly processes. 

We further note that this notice is not intended to be 

notification of every anomaly instance; this is only 

notification when there is reason to believe that there was an 

intentional attempt to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a national 

security space capability.

National security space defense and protection (sec. 912)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 912) that would 

require the Secretary of the Air Force to enter into an 

arrangement with the National Research Council to conduct a 

review in response to the near-term and long-term threats to the 

national security space systems of the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense and the 

Director of National Intelligence to enter into an arrangement 

with the National Research Council while requiring, in addition 

to other elements of the study, the Council take into account 

the affordability and technical risk of recommended courses of 

action.

Space acquisition strategy (sec. 913)
133

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 913) that would 

require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Chief 

Information Officer of the Department of Defense, to establish

a strategy for the multi-year procurement of commercial 

satellite services.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that changes the report to a briefing within 90 days 

after the date of enactment with an interim briefing at the time 

of the fiscal year 2015 budget submission.

Consistent with the Defense Business Board report, “Taking 

Advantage of Opportunities for Commercial Satellite Services,” 

Report FY13-02, February 2013, we direct the Executive Agent for 

Space to report back to the congressional defense committees 

before March 1, 2014, on how this office will take a more active 

role in implementing recommendation 10 of the report titled, 

“Facilitate future governance by designating a single DoD 

organization for procuring all SATCOM assets and services.”

We understand the U.S. Strategic Command, through the 

Defense Information Systems Agency, is involved with developing 

a long-term strategy for satellite communications titled, “Mix 

of Media Study.” We direct the Director of the Defense 

Information Systems Agency to brief the congressional defense 

committees on this study.

We are concerned about the Department's reliance on 1-year 

high-cost commercial satellite communications leases, and 

encourage the Department to continue to pursue innovative 

acquisition approaches, including multi-year leases and the 

procurement of government-owned transponders and payloads on 

commercial communication satellites.

Space control mission report (sec. 914)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 914) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees on the space control mission of 

the Department of Defense.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that requires an additional element of the report 

regarding force levels and structure of the future space control 

missions.

We believe the nature of the Department’s space control 

mission is fundamentally changing from purely collision 
134

avoidance and cataloging space objects, to additionally ensuring 

that the United States has, according to section 4(b) of the 

October 18, 2012, Department of Defense Directive on Space 

Policy, “the capabilities to respond at the time and place of 

our choosing” to “purposeful interference with U.S. space 

systems, including their supporting infrastructure” in ensuring

the right of “free access and use of space.” Consistent with 

the space policy directive, it is incumbent upon the Department 

to ensure there is a clear and concise concept of operations 

which supports the directive and that the congressional defense 

committees are updated on any significant developments as this 

additional mission evolves.

Responsive launch (sec. 915)

The House amendment contained a provision (sec. 915) that 

would require a study by the Department of Defense

Executive Agent for Space on responsive, low-cost launch efforts 

to include a review of existing and past operationally 

responsive, low-cost launch capabilities; a technology 

assessment of various methods to develop an operationally 

responsive, low-cost launch capability; and an assessment of the 

viability of any other innovative methods, such as secondary 

payload adapters on existing launch vehicles. In addition, this 

section would require a report from the Executive Agent for 

Space regarding the results of the above mentioned study, as 

well as a consolidated plan for development within the 

Department of an operationally responsive, low-cost launch 

capability.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would add as one of the factors the Executive 

Agent for Space to consider as part of the study to be the

identification of the conditions or requirements for responsive 

launch, which would provide the necessary military value, such 

as the requisite payload capacity, timelines for responsiveness, 

and the target launch costs. The amendment would also require a 

Government Accountability Office (GAO) review of the report by 

the Executive Agent for Space. The GAO may present the results 

of their review in the form of a briefing to the congressional 

defense committees.

Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program (sec. 

916)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 
135

(sec. 921) that would limit the amount of money able to be 

obligated or expended for the Space Protection Program by $10 

million until the Secretary of Defense submitted to the 

congressional defense committees a copy of all materials 

presented to inform the decision of the Deputy Secretary of 

Defense on the counter space strategy of the Department of 

Defense during the 3-year period ending on the date of the 

enactment of this Act that resulted in significant revisions to 

said strategy.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

We agree that the Secretary of Defense should provide the 

briefing, report, or other materials that were presented to the 

Deputy Secretary of Defense, which includes the Deputy Secretary 

Management Action Group briefing materials. We do not expect 

new work product to be produced. We expect the Department of 

Defense to submit only the materials that were presented to the 

Secretary to inform his decision on the way forward for the 

counterspace strategy, which would not include preliminary or 

background materials.

Eagle Vision system (sec. 917)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1065) that would require the Chief of Staff of the Air 

Force, within 180 days of the enactment of this Act, to submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report on the Eagle 

Vision imagery ground station. The report elements would 

include a description and assessment of the Department of 

Defense organizations to which the Eagle Vision system could be 

transferred, as well as the actions that would need to be taken 

prior to a transfer; the potential schedule for a transfer; and 

the possible effects of a transfer on the capabilities or use of 

the system. The provision would prohibit the Air Force from 

making changes to the organization and management of the program 

until 90 days after the submission of the report to Congress.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported 

provision.

Subtitle C–Defense Intelligence and 

Intelligence-Related Activities

Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in 

commercial activities as security for intelligence collection 

activities (sec. 921)
136

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 921) that would 

modify current statutory authority for the Secretary of Defense 

to conduct commercial activities that are necessary to provide 

security for authorized intelligence collection activities 

abroad undertaken by the Department of Defense. The provision 

would remove the requirement that the Secretary of Defense 

designate a single office within the Defense Intelligence Agency 

to be responsible for the management and supervision of all 

commercial activities authorized by the intelligence commercial 

activity statute; change the annual audit requirement to a 

biennial audit requirement; and add the congressional defense 

committees to the reporting requirement.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would maintain the annual audit requirement.

Department of Defense intelligence priorities (sec. 922)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 922) that would

require the Secretary of Defense to establish a written policy 

governing the internal coordination and prioritization of 

intelligence priorities of the Office of the Secretary of 

Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the 

military departments to improve identification of the 

intelligence needs of the Department of Defense. This section 

would also require the Secretary of Defense to identify any 

significant intelligence gaps of the Office of the Secretary of 

Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the 

military departments.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Defense Clandestine Service (sec. 923)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 923) that would 

prohibit the use of 50 percent of the funds authorized to be 

appropriated by this Act or otherwise available to the 

Department of Defense (DOD) for fiscal year 2014 for the Defense 

Clandestine Service (DCS) to be obligated or expended for the 

DCS until such time as the Secretary of Defense certifies to the 

congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee 

on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select 

Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, that the DCS is 

designed primarily to fulfill priorities of the DOD that are 
137

unique to the DOD or otherwise unmet; and provide unique 

capabilities to the intelligence community (as defined in 

section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 

401a(4))).

This section would also require the Secretary of Defense to 

design metrics that will be used to ensure that the DCS is 

employed in the manner certified; provide annual assessments for 

5 years based on the metrics established; submit prompt 

notifications of any significant changes; and provide quarterly 

briefings on deployments and collection activities.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 932) that would require the Secretary of Defense, acting 

through the Director of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation, 

and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, 

acting through the Cost Analysis Improvement Group, and the 

Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), to assess the 

potential cost savings and effectiveness improvements from 

consolidating clandestine human intelligence collection in the 

National Clandestine Service managed by the CIA.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation (sec. 

924)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 924) that would 

prohibit the Secretary of Defense from using any of the funds 

authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the 

Department of Defense during the period beginning on the date of 

the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to 

execute: the separation of the portion of the Department of 

Defense budget designated as part of the National Intelligence 

Program from the rest of the Department of Defense budget; the 

consolidation of the portion of the Department of Defense budget 

designated as part of the National Intelligence Program within 

the Department of Defense budget; or the establishment of a new 

appropriations account or appropriations account structure for 

such funds. The provision would also require the Secretary of 

Defense and the Director of National Intelligence to jointly 

brief the congressional defense and intelligence committees not 

later than 30 days after enactment of this Act on any planning 

relating to future execution that has occurred during the past 2 

years and any anticipated future planning and related efforts.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Subtitle D–Cyberspace-Related Matters
138

Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of 

Defense tactical data link systems (sec. 931)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 931) that would 

amend section 934 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to include a requirement 

that the vulnerabilities of data link systems be assessed in 

anti-access or area-denial environments. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States 

Cyber Command (sec. 932)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 932) that would 

require the Defense Science Board to conduct an independent 

assessment of the organization, missions, and authorities of 

U.S. Cyber Command (CYBERCOM).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 941) that would require the Secretary of Defense 

to delegate signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection authorities 

to CYBERCOM; provide CYBERCOM with the infrastructure and 

equipment to operate independently of the National Security 

Agency (NSA) to conduct operations in cyberspace; provide range 

capabilities to meet CYBERCOM’s unique requirements for wartime 

offensive operations; designate an official within the Office of 

the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy to serve as the 

Secretary’s principal advisor on offensive military cyber 

operations and to supervise the organization, manning, and 

equipping of such forces; and to establish appropriate training 

facilities for cyber personnel. In addition, the provision 

would express the sense of Congress that CYBERCOM personnel 

assigned to support offensive cyber missions should be funded 

and managed outside of the Military Intelligence Program (MIP) 

and Information Systems Security Program (ISSP).

The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported 

provision with an amendment. The amendment would assign to the 

principal advisor responsibility for the overall supervision of 

cyber activities in the Department, including oversight of 

policy and operational matters, resources, personnel, 

acquisition, and technology. In carrying out these 

responsibilities, the principal advisor shall create a full-time 

cross-functional team of subject-matter experts from the Office 

of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the military 

departments, defense agencies, and combatant commands.
139

We stress that this construct of an interdepartmental team 

under the direction of the principal advisor for cyber is not 

intended to be merely a coordinating committee, but will provide 

strong leadership through a joint mechanism to achieve a common 

purpose and unity of effort in policy, planning, programming, 

and oversight to support a complex mission that spans the entire 

Department of Defense. We believe there are good models for 

effective cross-functional teams, such as the Joint Inter Agency 

Task Force-South, which successfully brings stakeholders 

together, including their specific authorities and capabilities, 

under a single organization. This team concept requires that 

members operate and think holistically, without regard to home 

institution loyalties, and receive training in team dynamics and 

conflict resolution.

 With regard to cyber acquisitions, we note that there is an 

existing congressionally-mandated joint entity, the Cyber 

Investment Management Board, which is chaired by the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, 

the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and the Vice Chairman 

of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. We believe such organizations 

should be leveraged to the extent possible in organizing this 

cross functional team.

The amendment does not include the requirement for the 

Secretary of Defense to delegate SIGINT authority to CYBERCOM, 

because the NSA Director has already made such a delegation. If 

a decision is made in the future to separate the positions of 

NSA Director and Commander of CYBERCOM, it would be appropriate 

for this delegation to come directly from the Secretary of 

Defense.

The amendment also does not include the sense of the 

Congress that CYBERCOM personnel assigned to support offensive 

missions should be funded and managed outside of the MIP and 

ISSP. We expect the Secretary of Defense to devise means to 

ensure that CYBERCOM personnel include non-career intelligence 

and cybersecurity officers and enlisted personnel with 

experience in combat arms. 

We are aware that there are renewed deliberations about the 

potential of elevating U.S. Cyber Command from a sub-unified 

command to a full unified command. As noted by section 940 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112-239), we expect to be briefed and consulted on 

any such proposal at the time when the Secretary of Defense 

makes such a decision. As these policy discussions progress, we 

expect the Department to keep the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives informed, upon 

request, during the quarterly cyber operations briefings, 

particularly as they relate to the estimated costs and policy 
140

implications associated with making the U.S. Cyber Command a 

unified command.

Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense 

(sec. 933)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 933) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a mission analysis 

of Department of Defense cyber operations and to provide a 

report on the results of the mission analysis to the 

congressional defense committees. It would also require the 

Chief of the National Guard Bureau to provide an assessment of 

the role of the National Guard in supporting Department of 

Defense cyber missions.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 945) that would require the Secretary of Defense 

to develop a strategy for using the reserve components of the 

armed forces to support the cyber missions of U.S. Cyber 

Command, including in support of civil authorities, and to 

report to the congressional defense committees on this strategy 

within 180 days of the enactment of this Act.

The agreement merges these provisions with minor 

modifications to each.

Modification of requirement for Report on Department of Defense 

Progress in Defending the Department and the Defense Industrial 

Base from Cyber Events (sec. 934)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 934) that would 

require that the Secretary of Defense provide written 

notification to the congressional defense committees within 30 

days of the initiation of any investigations carried out related 

to the potential compromise of Department of Defense critical 

program information related to weapon systems and other 

developmental activities, and within 30 days of the completion 

of any such investigations. Additionally, the provision would 

require a report to be submitted to the congressional defense 

committees within 60 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, on all of the known network cyber intrusions from 

January 1, 2000, until August 1, 2013, resulting in compromise 

of critical program information.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would modify section 935(b)(3) of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111-383) to include an element in the existing reporting 
141

requirement to address the economic impacts of reported network 

intrusions.

Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the 

Department of Defense (sec. 935)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 935) that would 

require the Chief Information Officer of the Department of 

Defense to revise the reporting requirements of section 937 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for 2013 (Public Law 112-

239) to include new elements that would verify that the format 

of the process was verified by an independent third party, 

implement processes for validating and reporting registration 

and deregistration of new software, and update the timeline for 

implementation based on these new requirements.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a technical 

amendment.

Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses (sec. 

936)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 938) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to establish an outreach and 

education program to assist small businesses to help them 

understand the cyber threat, and develop plans to protect their 

intellectual property and networks.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require a briefing to the congressional 

defense committees within 60 days of the enactment of this Act 

on options for strengthening outreach and threat awareness 

activities for small businesses.

We recognize the challenges faced by industry, especially 

small businesses, when it comes to understanding and defending 

against advanced cyber threats. There are a number of 

initiatives and mechanisms within the Department that address 

aspects of this challenge, such as the Defense Industrial Base 

Information Assurance/Cyber Security program. Because these 

other efforts exist, we believe that new programs are not 

needed. We believe, though, that inadequate attention has been 

paid to effectively coordinate those initiatives, focus them on 

supporting the needs of small businesses, or attempt to measure 

the strategic effectiveness of those programs.
142

Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for the 

Department of Defense (sec. 937)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 942) that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

establish a joint software assurance center to serve as a 

resource for securing the software acquired, developed, 

maintained, and used in the Department of Defense (DOD). The 

provision would require the Secretary to consider whether an 

existing center could fulfill the purposes of the required 

center. 

The provision would require the Secretary, within 180 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, to issue a charter for 

the center that lays out: (1) The center's role in supporting 

program offices in implementing DOD's supply chain risk 

management strategy and policies; (2) The center's expertise and 

capabilities; (3) The center's management, in coordination with 

the Center for Assured Software (CAS) of the National Security 

Agency, of a research and development program to improve the 

capability of automated software analysis tools; and (4) The 

center's management of the procurement and distribution of 

enterprise licenses for such analysis tools. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would create a federation of capabilities, rather 

than a single center, as well as link existing resources and 

centers of excellence, for hardware as well as software 

assurance. Additionally, the amendment would emphasize 

supporting the trusted defense systems strategy, which includes 

both software assurance activities, as well as assurance of 

hardware components. In assessing the capabilities that exist 

throughout the Department that could be used to support the 

trusted defense strategy, the Department shall only create new 

centers or new resources when it has conducted a gap analysis 

that indicates the need for new resources or capabilities.

We believe that the trusted defense systems strategy 

provides a good foundation for guiding the work of these centers 

in supporting the acquisition and testing community. As it 

relates specifically to software assurance, we further note that 

the DOD is in the process of developing a baseline software 

assurance policy for the entire life cycle of covered systems in 

response to section 933 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239). We believe that 

any such guidance and direction for Department program managers 

should, where possible, and where consistent with adequate 

security for covered systems and the national security, be 

consistent with recognized standards, and should explore options 
143

for accepting self-certification or third-party certification 

for compliance purposes. 

Furthermore, we believe that this software assurance policy 

should, where possible, and where consistent with adequate 

security for covered systems and the national security, be 

developed in compliance with the Office of Management and Budget 

Memorandum for Chief Information Officers and Senior Procurement 

Executive’s titled “Technology Neutrality,” dated January 7, 

2011. We also believes that any future software assurance 

policy that includes requirements concerning Federal 

participation in the development and use of voluntary consensus 

standards should be conducted in accordance with the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, section 272 of 

title 15, United States Code, and the Office of Management and 

Budget Circular A-119.

Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities 

(sec. 938)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 943) that would require the Secretary of Defense, through 

the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and 

Logistics, the Under Secretary of the Defense for Intelligence, 

the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and 

the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, to 

supervise the development and implementation of plans for the 

acquisition of cloud computing capabilities for intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance data analysis in the military 

services and defense agencies.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would make the supervisory requirements apply to all cloud 

computing acquisition decisions in excess of $1.0 million.

Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems 

and tactical communications systems (sec. 939)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 944) that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

provide an assessment of the cyber threats to major weapons 

systems and tactical communications systems that could emerge 

within the next years; an assessment of the cyber 

vulnerabilities of major weapons systems and tactical 

communications systems; a description of the current strategy to 

defend against battlefield cyber attacks; and an estimate of the 

costs to correct the vulnerabilities in the future. That report 

would be required within 180 days. 
144

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require the report within 1 year.

Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons (sec. 940)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 946) that would require the President to establish an 

interagency process to develop policy to control the 

proliferation of cyber weapons through unilateral and 

cooperative export controls, law enforcement activities, 

financial means, diplomatic engagement, and other means that the 

President considers appropriate. The provision would also 

require the President to develop a statement of principles 

regarding U.S. positions on controlling the proliferation of 

cyber weapons to create new opportunities for bilateral and 

multilateral cooperation to address this shared threat. The 

provision would require the interagency process to produce 

recommendations within 270 days of the enactment of this Act.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require the President, to the extent 

practicable, to provide for industry participation in the 

interagency process.

Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace (sec. 941)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 947) that would require the President to establish an 

interagency process to develop an integrated policy to deter 

adversaries in cyberspace. The provision would require the 

President to provide a report to the congressional defense 

committees on this policy within 270 days after the enactment of 

this Act.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance 

Education matters (sec. 942)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 948) that would ensure that Centers of Academic Excellence 

(CAEs) in Information Assurance do not lose their certification 

as CAEs in fiscal year 2014 as a result of recent changes in the 

certification criteria developed by the National Security Agency 

(NSA). The provision also would require the President, in

consultation with the Secretary of Education and with the advice 
145

of the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and 

Integrity, to: (1) Determine whether information assurance has 

matured to the point where the Federal Government should no 

longer serve as the accrediting authority for information 

assurance programs at institutions of higher education; and (2) 

Based on that determination, reform the current practice of NSA 

developing the criteria to guide the curricula and certifying 

the status of the CAEs.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would: (1) Extend the period through which the 

current CAEs would preserve their designation to June 30, 2015; 

(2) Task the Secretary of Defense to thoroughly assess the CAEs 

program, the maturity of cybersecurity as an academic 

discipline, the role that the Federal Government should continue 

to play in developing curricula and accrediting programs, and 

the alignment of current processes with the National Initiative 

for Cybersecurity Education; (3) Require the Secretary to make 

recommendations for improving the curricula and designation 

process and for transitioning that process from the sole 

administration of NSA; (4) Require the Secretary to assess the 

Department’s scholarship for service program with the CAEs; and 

(5) Require the Secretary to submit to Congress a plan for 

implementing his recommendations and the results of his 

assessments. The provision requires the Secretary to consult 

with the Secretary of Homeland Security, a wide variety of 

others, including the Director of NSA, and other government 

organizations, academia, and the private sector.

Subtitle E-Total Force Management

Reviews of appropriate manpower performance (sec. 951)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 942) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to certify that all contractor 

positions performing inherently governmental functions have been 

eliminated.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would extend the requirement contained in section 803(c) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2010 (P.L. 

111-84) for 3 years and require the Department of Defense (DOD) 

Inspector General to report to the congressional defense 

committees the Inspector General’s assessment of DOD’s efforts 

to compile the inventory, including the actions taken to resolve 
146

the findings of the reviews, pursuant to section 2463 of this 

title.

Six years beyond the original requirement to implement an 

inventory of contracted services, DOD has taken its first steps 

to implement a November 2011 plan to collect contractor manpower 

data from contractors. These steps included directing 

components to start collecting direct labor hours and associated 

costs from contractors and initiating efforts to develop and 

implement a department-wide data collection system based on the 

Army’s Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA) to 

collect and store inventory data, including contractor manpower 

data. Reportedly, DOD officials estimate that the new system 

will be available in fiscal year 2014, with DOD components 

reporting on most of their contracted services by fiscal year 

2016. 

We expect DOD to continue to make progress towards 

implementing these goals, and therefore, have continued the 

reporting requirements in section 803(c) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for fiscal year 2010 (P.L. 111-84) for 3 

years. We expect the Comptroller General to submit a report 

consistent with that section including a review of progress made 

to develop and implement a department-wide data collection 

system based on CMRA.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of 

the Navy and Marine Corps

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 901) that would 

redesignate the Department of the Navy as the Department of the 

Navy and Marine Corps, and redesignate the position of the 

Secretary of the Navy as the Secretary of the Navy and the 

Marine Corps. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Under Secretary of Defense for Management 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 901) that would convert the position of Deputy Chief 

Management Officer (DCMO) to Under Secretary of Defense for 

Management (USD(M)) and to designate that position as the Chief 

Information Officer (CIO) of the Department of Defense. This 

provision would mandate the USD(M) exercise authority, 

direction, and control over the Information Assurance 
147

Directorate of the National Security Agency. Additionally, this 

provision would unify roles and functions traditionally formed 

by the CIO and strengthen the office by making it a Senateconfirmed position again, but without creating a new position.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

We note that the Department has recently made the 

congressional defense committees aware of a proposal that 

addresses the concerns raised by the Senate committee-reported 

bill. We will evaluate this proposal before making a decision 

on elevating the DCMO and designating that new position as 

responsible for the CIO roles.

Report on strategic importance of United States military 

installation of the U.S. Pacific Command

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 903) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report on the 

strategic value of each major installation that supports 

operations in the U.S. Pacific Command area of responsibility.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

Transfer of administration of Ocean Research Advisory Panel from 

Department of the Navy to National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 904) that would transfer responsibility for administration 

of the Ocean Research Advisory Panel from the Department of the 

Navy to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Navy broad-area maritime surveillance aircraft 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 933) that would require the Secretary of Defense to take 

appropriate actions to modify the Navy’s Broad Area Maritime 

Surveillance (BAMS) aircraft fleet to provide a ground moving 

target indicator (GMTI) collection, processing, and 

dissemination capability that is comparable to the performance 

of the Air Force’s Global Hawk Block 40 Multi-Platform Radar 

Insertion Program. The provision would also require the 

Secretary to designate the BAMS aircraft fleet as a joint asset 

available to support the operational requirements of the unified 
148

combatant commands.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We agree, however, that the Department of Defense should 

determine whether a GMTI capability should be integrated into 

the Navy’s BAMS aircraft fleet, and whether this system should 

be a joint asset for the combatant commands. Therefore, we 

direct the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his 

capacity as the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight 

Council (JROC), to conduct a study and provide a report to the 

appropriate congressional committees on the JROC’s assessment of 

whether adding a GMTI capability to the Navy’s BAMS aircraft 

fleet is feasible, affordable, and advisable by June 2, 2014. 

For this report, the appropriate congressional defense 

committees are the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

Senate; and the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

Limitation on availability of funds for collaborative 

cybersecurity activities with China 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 936) that would 

prevent appropriated funds to be used for collaborative 

cybersecurity activities with the People’s Republic of China. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

Small business cybersecurity solutions office

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 937) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress 

on the feasibility of establishing a small business cyber 

technology office to assist small businesses in providing 

cybersecurity solutions to the Federal Government.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We recognize the challenges faced by the government in 

gaining access to truly innovative solutions for cybersecurity 

threats. Many of the most innovative technologies available to 

the government come from small businesses. However, it is also 

clear that the defense acquisition system, which can be 

difficult to navigate even for large businesses, can pose acute 

difficulties for small businesses to be able to find 
149

opportunities, respond effectively to lengthy contracting 

paperwork, and maintain compliance with arcane acquisition 

regulations. Within the Department of Defense, there exist 

offices for small and disadvantaged businesses which have been 

established to help support small businesses specifically to 

navigate these problems. We recognize the value these 

organizations already provide in supporting small businesses, 

and believe it would be redundant to create new offices to focus 

solely on cybersecurity solutions.

Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of government oversight 

of functions closely associated with inherently governmental 

functions 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 941) that would 

amend sections 129a and 2330a of title 10, United States Code, 

to ensure that sufficient levels of government oversight are in 

place for contracted services and aligns current Department of 

Defense policies related to Total Force Management.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

TITLE X–GENERAL PROVISIONS

Budget Item

Funding for New START Treaty preparatory activities

The funding authorized by this Act would include funds for 

activities to prepare to implement nuclear force reductions to 

meet the levels prescribed by the New START Treaty. Elsewhere 

in this Act, a limitation is included that would ensure only 

preparatory activities for such reductions may be carried out in

fiscal year 2014.

Subtitle A–Financial Matters

General transfer authority (sec. 1001)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1001) that would 

provide the Department of Defense with $3.5 billion of general 

transfer authority in fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1001) that would provide the Department of 
150

Defense with $4.0 billion of general transfer authority in 

fiscal year 2014.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would provide the Department of Defense with $5.0 

billion of general transfer authority in fiscal year 2014.

Budgetary effects of this Act (sec. 1002)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1002) that would 

determine the budgetary effects of this Act.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 4).

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial 

statements (sec. 1003)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1003) that would 

express the sense of Congress regarding the Department of 

Defense’s ongoing Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness 

process and support the goal of audit readiness across the 

Department by 2017. This section would also require that a full 

and complete audit takes place for fiscal year 2018.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a technical 

amendment.

Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security 

Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization (sec. 

1004)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1004) that would 

provide the Secretary of Defense the authority to transfer up to 

$150.0 million to the nuclear weapons program of the National 

Nuclear Security Administration if the amount authorized to be 

appropriated or otherwise made available for that program is 

less than $8.4 billion (the amount specified for fiscal

year 2014 in the report required by section 1251 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–

84)).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle B–Counter-Drug Activities
151

Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and 

counterterrorism campaign in Colombia (sec. 1011)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1011) that would 

extend, by 1 year, the unified counter-drug and counterterrorism 

campaign in the Republic of Colombia originally authorized by 

section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375), and 

most recently amended by section 1013 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1011) that would extend, for 2 fiscal years, the 

authority of the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance to 

support the unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign 

of the Government of Colombia. The provision would also 

incorporate a notification to Congress to improve transparency 

of the Department of Defense's use of this authority. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would modify the extension of the underlying 

authority by 1 fiscal year and modify elements of the 

notification requirement.

We note that the Government of Colombia has made and 

continues to make progress combating narcotics trafficking and 

designated foreign terrorist organizations. This type of 

flexible authority remains required to assist the Government of 

Colombia consolidate its hard-fought gains.

Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support 

to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism 

activities (sec. 1012)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1012) that would 

extend, by 1 fiscal year, the support by joint task forces under 

section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136), as most recently amended 

by section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1012) to extend by 2 fiscal years the support 

under section 1022(b).

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional 

support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign 

governments (sec. 1013)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1013) that would 
152

extend, by 2 years, the authority to provide support for 

counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments, 

originally authorized by subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 

(Public Law 105-85), and most recently amended by section 1006 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

(Public Law 112-81).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1013) that would extend, by 5 years, the authority to 

provide support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign 

governments under subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public 

Law 105-85), as most recently amended by section 1006 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public 

Law 112-81). The provision would also expand the list of 

countries eligible to receive support to include the Governments 

of Chad, Libya, Mali, and Niger.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would extend the underlying authority for 3 years 

and expand the list of countries eligible to receive support.

We direct the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Counternarcotics and Global Threats (DASD CN/GT) to provide a 

briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives in fiscal year 2014 on the country 

plans associated with the four additional countries under this 

authority, including a description of the status of any 

assistance to be provided or planned to be provided, how the 

effectiveness of this assistance is to be measured, and how this 

assistance will reinforce other related Department of Defense 

activities in the region. The committee further directs the 

DASD CN/GT to submit a report updating the aforementioned

committees on the status of these matters in fiscal year 2015.

Subtitle C–Naval Vessels and Shipyards

Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for the 

construction of naval vessels (sec. 1021)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1026) that would modify section 231 of title 10, United 

States Code, to include a requirement to report on the total 

cost of construction for each vessel used to determine estimated 

levels of annual funding in the report, and an assessment of the 

extent of the strategic and operational risk to national 

security whenever the number or capabilities of the naval 

vessels in the plan do not meet requirements.

The House bill contained no similar provision.
153

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical/clarifying amendment.

Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at 

no cost to the Navy (sec. 1022)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1021) would 

amend subsection (a) of section 7306 of title 10, United States 

Code, to clarify that ship donations would be only to operate 

the vessel as a museum or memorial for public display in the 

United States. This language would provide the Navy with the 

flexibility to oversee a vessel donee’s actions, without any 

implication that the Navy retains ownership of the vessel. The 

provision would also prevent the Federal Government from 

providing funding for any improvement, upgrade, modification, 

maintenance, preservation, or repair to a vessel donated under 

this section.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1024).

The agreement includes this provision, but with 

modifications that would prevent the Department of Defense from 

providing additional funding for any donated vessel, not the 

Federal Government as a whole. These modifications would allow 

other federal departments to contribute to ship museums or ship 

memorials to the extent that the departments have authorization 

to do so. 

Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of 

Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships (sec. 1023)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1022) that would 

limit the obligation and expenditure of funds authorized to be 

appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 

for the retirement, inactivation, or storage of a cruiser or 

dock landing ship. This section would provide an exception for 

the retirement of the U.S.S. Denver (LPD-9). The provision 

would also provide additional transfer authority for the purpose 

of providing sufficient appropriations to support the 

modernization of seven cruisers.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would delete the additional transfer authority. 

Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions (sec.

1024)
154

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1025) that would 

allow the Secretary of the Navy to extend or renew the lease of 

not more than four blocking vessels supporting the Transit 

Protection System Escort Program. The provision would also 

require the Secretary, prior to extending or renewing such a 

lease, to submit to the congressional defense committees a 

notification of the proposed extension or renewal, along with a 

detailed description of the term of the proposed contract and a 

justification for extending or renewing the lease, as opposed to 

obtaining the capability through purchase of such vessels.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would allow the Secretary of the Navy to accept 

and retain payment-in-kind in lieu of monetary payment for 

purposes of settling the litigation arising from the default 

termination on contract number N00019-88-C-0050 for development 

and production of the A-12 aircraft. Also, it is understood 

that the Secretary of the Navy is authorized to enter into 

agreements to modify contracts in order to effect a settlement 

to the litigation.

Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships 

(sec. 1025)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1026) that would 

require the Secretary of the Navy to submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report providing an updated comparison of 

the costs and risks of acquiring DDG-1000 and DDG-51 Flight III 

vessels equipped for enhanced ballistic missile defense 

capability. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

technical/clarifying amendment.

Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure Assessment (sec. 

1026)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1022) that would direct the Chief of Naval Operations 

(CNO) to provide a report to the congressional defense 

committees no later than February 1, 2014, that would assess the 

current fleet capabilities compared to the threat and the likely 

situation over the next 30 years. The CNO should produce an 

unclassified report, as well as a classified annex to that 

report.
155

The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 1024) 

that would express the sense of Congress that additional funding 

should be prioritized toward shipbuilding efforts and that 

Department of the Navy budget projections should realistically 

anticipate the true investment to meet force structure goals.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would add several items to the list of issues to 

be addressed in the report, including an assessment by the 

Commandant of the Marine Corps of: (1) The operational risk 

associated with the current and the planned number of ships of 

the amphibious assault force; and (2) The capabilities required 

to meet the needs of the Marine Corps for future ships of the 

amphibious assault force. The amendment would also delay the 

required date for the report until 30 days after the Secretary 

of Defense submits the annual naval vessel construction plan 

required by section 231 of title 10, United States Code. 

Modification of policy relating to major combatant vessels of 

the strike forces of the Navy (sec. 1027)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1023) that would repeal section 1012 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-

181). That section requires that the Navy build any new class 

of major surface combatant and amphibious assault ship with an 

integrated nuclear power system, unless the Secretary of the 

Navy notifies the congressional defense committees that, as a 

result of a cost-benefit analysis, it would not be practical for 

the Navy to design the class of ships with an integrated nuclear 

power system.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would amend section 1021 to: (1) delete the 

requirement to include integrated nuclear power systems in any 

new ship class, and (2) add the requirement that the Navy 

analyze integrated nuclear power alternative in its analysis of 

alternatives for new ship classes, and report the results of 

that analysis in the budget request. 

Subtitle D–Counterterrorism

Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on 

military commissions (sec. 1031)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1030) that would 

amend chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, to clarify 

the procedures for the convening authority to detail alternate 
156

members to a military commission. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1034). 

The agreement contains the House provision. 

Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship 

Program reporting requirement (sec. 1032)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1031) that would 

modify the Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship 

Program to require additional annual reporting requirements.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in 

the United States to house detainees transferred from United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1033)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1032) that would 

prohibit the use of Department of Defense (DOD) funds through 

December 31, 2014, to construct or modify facilities in the 

United States, its territories, or possessions, to house any 

detainee transferred from U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba, for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in DOD 

custody or control unless authorized by Congress. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision. 

Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of 

individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo 

Bay, Cuba (sec. 1034)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1034) that would 

prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to transfer or 

release any detainee at U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba, to or within the United States, its territories, or 

possessions through December 31, 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1033) that would prohibit the transfer or release of 

Guantanamo detainees to the United States during fiscal year 

2014, except that the Secretary of Defense could authorize such 

a transfer for detention and trial if the Secretary determines 

that doing so would be in the U.S. national security interest 

and that appropriate actions have been or will be taken to 

address any public safety risks that could arise in connection 
157

with the transfer. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1035)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1033) that would 

restrict the Secretary of Defense from transferring or releasing 

individuals detained at U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba, (GTMO) to a foreign country or foreign entity unless the 

Secretary makes certain specified certifications to Congress not 

later than 30 days prior to any such transfer or release. The 

restrictions of this provision would apply through December 31, 

2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1031) that would authorize two procedures for the transfer 

or release of Guantanamo detainees to their country of origin or 

another country other than the United States. The first part of 

the provision would authorize such transfers or releases under 

certain specified circumstances, specifically: (1) If following 

a review by a Periodic Review Board, the detainee is determined 

to no longer be a threat to U.S. national security; (2) In order 

to effectuate a court order; or (3) If a detainee has been tried 

and acquitted or tried, convicted, and has served his sentence. 

The second part of the provision would allow the Secretary of 

Defense to authorize the transfer of Guantanamo detainees 

overseas only if he determines, following a rigorous assessment 

of a number of specified factors, that doing so would be in the 

U.S. national security interest and steps have been or will be 

taken to mitigate the risk of recidivism by the individual to be 

transferred. The provision would require the Secretary of 

Defense to notify Congress of a determination to transfer or 

release a Guantanamo detainee not later than 30 days prior to 

the transfer or release, and specifies the information that must 

be provided as part of such notifications. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would: 

(a) narrow the specified circumstances under which 

transfers or releases are authorized under the first part 

of the provision to only (1) and (2) above; 

(b) expand the factors that the Secretary of Defense 

must specifically evaluate and consider in making his 

determination whether to transfer a Guantanamo detainee 

overseas, including the security situation in the country 

to which the detainee would be transferred, the presence of 

foreign terrorist groups in the recipient country, whether 

the recipient country is a state sponsor of terrorism, and 
158

whether the detainee has been tried and acquitted or tried, 

convicted, and completed his sentence; and 

(c) expand the information that must be included in 

the congressional notification provided not later than 30 

days prior to the transfer, including information on any 

actions taken to address the risk of reengagement by the 

detainee in terrorist activities, a copy of any Periodic 

Review Board findings, an assessment of the capacity of the 

receiving country, and a description of the Secretary of 

Defense’s evaluation of the factors to be considered in 

making the Secretary’s determination in support of the 

transfer. 

Report on information relating to individuals detained at 

Parwan, Afghanistan (sec. 1036)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1035) that would 

require the public disclosure of an unclassified summary of 

certain information relating to individuals held at the 

Detention Facility in Parwan, Afghanistan, that have been 

designated as enduring security threats to the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense 

committees a classified report containing certain specified 

information relating to detainees at Parwan that have been 

designated as enduring security threats. The Secretary would 

also be required to review the classified report to determine 

what summary information, if any, can be declassified and made 

publicly available, to the maximum extent practicable consistent 

with national security. 

Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military 

commissions established to try individuals detained at 

Guantanamo (sec. 1037)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1038) that would 

require that, for purposes of any military commission trial of 

an individual detained at the U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo 

Bay, Cuba, the chief defense counsel and the chief prosecutor 

must have the same rank.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require that for purposes of any such 

military commission trial, the chief defense counsel and the 
159

chief prosecutor must have the same grade. The amendment would 

also provide that the Secretary of Defense may temporarily waive 

this requirement if the Secretary determines that compliance 

with the requirement either would be infeasible due to the nonavailability of qualified officers of the same grade to fill the 

billets or would cause significant disruption to the trial 

proceedings. The amendment would also require the Secretary of 

Defense to issue guidance to ensure that the offices of the 

chief defense counsel and the chief prosecutor receive equitable 

resources, personnel support, and logistical support for 

conducting their duties in connection with any such military 

commission trial. We note that the intent of this requirement 

is to ensure fairness and impartiality in the resources and 

support provided to each of these offices. 

Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, 

rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo 

who are transferred to Yemen (sec. 1038)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1039) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to 

jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives,

and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, a report 

on the capability of the Republic of Yemen to detain, 

rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals transferred there from 

U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision. 

Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at 

Guantanamo if transferred to the United States (sec. 1039)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General to 

jointly submit to the congressional defense committees and the 

Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives, a report on whether detainees, if transferred 

to the United States from the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility, 

would become eligible for certain legal rights by reason of 

their transfer.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, 

to submit to the congressional defense committees and the 
160

Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives, a report on the legal rights, if any, for which 

a Guantanamo detainee, if transferred to the United States, may 

become eligible, by reason of such transfer. The report would 

also include an analysis of the extent to which legislation or 

other steps could address any such legal rights. 

Subtitle E–Sensitive Military Operations

Congressional notification of sensitive military operations 

(sec. 1041)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1041) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional 

defense committees notice in writing of any sensitive military 

operation following such operation. This section would also 

require the Secretary of Defense to establish procedures not 

later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act 

for providing such notice in a manner consistent with the 

national security of the United States and the protection of 

operational integrity.

The Senate committee-passed bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Counterterrorism operational briefings (sec. 1042)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1043) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to provide quarterly briefings 

to the congressional defense committees outlining Department of 

Defense counterterrorism operations and related activities. 

Each briefing would include: a global update on activity within 

each geographic combatant command; an overview of authorities 

and legal issues including limitations; an outline of 

interagency activities and initiatives; and any other matters 

the Secretary considers appropriate.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would: (1) modify the elements required as part 

of the briefings and (2) repeal section 1031 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-

81) – a nearly identical requirement.

Report on process for determining targets of lethal or capture 

operations (sec. 1043)
161

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1042) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report within 60 

days after the date of the enactment of this Act containing an 

explanation of the legal and policy considerations and approval 

processes used in determining whether an individual or group of 

individuals could be the target of a lethal operation or capture 

operation conducted by the Armed Forces of the United States 

outside the United States.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would provide 90 days for the Secretary of 

Defense to provide the required report and make a number of 

technical modifications.

Subtitle F-Nuclear Forces

Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dualcapable aircraft based in Europe (sec. 1051)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1053) that would 

provide that funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 

otherwise made available may not be used to reduce or 

consolidate U.S. dual-capable aircraft in Europe until 90 days 

after the Secretary of Defense certifies to the

congressional defense committees that the Russian Federation has

carried out similar actions; the Secretary has consulted with 

the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 

(NATO) about the proposed action with respect to U.S. dual 

capable aircraft; and, there is a consensus among NATO member 

states in support of such action.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment replacing the provisions with a sense of Congress 

regarding reductions or consolidations of dual-capable aircraft. 

The amendment also requires a notification 90 days before the 

date on which the Secretary reduces or consolidates dual capable 

aircraft that includes the reason for the reduction or 

consolidation, any effects from such action on the extended 

deterrence mission of the United States, the manner in which the 

military requirements of the NATO will be met following such 

actions, a statement by the Secretary on the response of NATO to 

such actions, and whether there is any change in the force 

posture of Russia from such actions including nonstrategic 

nuclear weapons.
162

Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, 

Control, and Communications System (sec. 1052)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 903) that would establish a council to coordinate 

activities related to national leadership command, control, and 

communications systems, including the nuclear command, control, 

and communications system.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would change the co-chairs of the Council to the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and 

Logistics, the Vice-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and 

would add the Director of the National Security Agency to the 

Council. The amendment requires an annual report by the 

Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, through the Chairman of the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff on the adequacy of the President’s budget 

to meet required capabilities of the nuclear command and control 

communications system for national leadership of the United 

States and the impact, if any, if annual appropriations do not 

meet the President’s budget request. The amendment would also 

seek to add more transparency to the budget for Nuclear Command 

and Control activities. A clerical amendment is made 

transferring a provision from 10 U.S.C. 491 regarding anomalies 

in the Nuclear Command and Control system to this new provision.

Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements of 

Nuclear Weapons Council (sec. 1053)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1041) that would amend section 179 of title 10, United 

States Code, by striking the responsibilities for nuclear 

command, control, and communications since another section of 

this Act establishes a Council on Oversight of the National 

Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System. The 

Senate committee-reported bill also contained a provision adding 

a new requirement to report on joint activities between the 

Department of Defense and the Department of Energy on nuclear 

security.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that clarifies the nature of the joint report by the 

Department of Defense and the Department of Energy. We believe 

the information required to be provided in this joint report 

should be substantially similar as that provided in the Joint 

Surety Report pursuant to National Security Presidential 
163

Directive 28. 

Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear weapons 

stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery 

systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system(sec. 

1054)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1042) that would amend section 1043 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2012 (Public Law 112-

81), which provides for a report to the congressional defense 

committees with a 10-year funding profile for the Department of 

Energy's (DOE) and the Department of Defense's (DOD) strategic 

deterrent modernization program. Specifically, the provision 

would give both departments 60 days after budget submission to 

deliver the section 1043 report. If a delay is anticipated that 

is greater than 60 days, DOE and DOD must notify the 

congressional defense committees before the President's budget 

submission and provide a briefing no later than 30 days after 

budget submission.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would move the report deadline to 30 days after 

the President’s budget submission. The amendment would also 

provide that, if it is determined that the report submission 

will require longer than 30 days, a briefing will be provided to 

the congressional defense committees within 30 days after

submission of the budget request. Regardless of any such 

determination or briefing, the report would be required to be 

submitted no later than 60 days after submission of the budget 

request.

Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad (sec. 1055)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1051) that would 

prohibit any of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 

Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 

Department of Defense from being obligated or expended to 

reduce, convert, or decommission any strategic delivery system 

of the United States if such reduction, conversion, or 

decommissioning would eliminate a leg of the nuclear triad. 

This section defines “nuclear triad” as: (1) land-based 

intercontinental ballistic missiles; (2) submarine-launched 

ballistic missiles and their associated ballistic missile 

submarines; and (3) nuclear-certified strategic bombers.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
164

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment containing technical corrections.

Implementation of New START Treaty (sec. 1056)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 132) that would amend section 131(a)(1) of the John Warner 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (P.L. 

109–364) by striking the term in a common capability 

configuration. 

The House bill (section 241) contained a provision that 

requires the Secretary of Defense to keep each Minuteman III 

silo as of the date of enactment of this Act in a warm status 

and that it remains a functioning element of the missile field 

and can be made functional with a deployed missile.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1045) that states the Secretary of Defense may, 

in a manner consistent with international obligations, retain 

missile launch facilities currently supporting up to 800 

deployed and non-deployed strategic launchers, maintain 

intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) on alert or 

operationally deployed status, and preserve ICBM silos in 

operational or warm status.

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1052) that would 

provide that none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 

the Department of Defense or the National Nuclear Security 

Administration may be obligated or expended to carry out 

reductions to the nuclear forces of the United States required 

by the New START Treaty until the Secretary of Defense provides 

the plan required by section 1042(a) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) and 

the President certifies that any reductions to U.S. nuclear 

forces below the level required by the New START Treaty will be 

carried out only pursuant to a treaty or international agreement 

approved according to the Treaty Clause of the Constitution of 

the United States or an affirmative act of Congress. 

The agreement includes a provision that would authorize the 

use of fiscal year 2014 funds for the purpose of preparing to 

implement reductions in nuclear forces necessary to meet the 

levels required by the New START Treaty subject to additional 

limitations as found in subsection (b) of the agreement. The 

agreement requires the Secretary of Defense to include with the 

defense budget materials a consolidated budget justification 

display that covers each activity associated with implementation 

of the New START Treaty. Subsection (b) of the provision would 

limit amounts spent for an environmental assessment for any 
165

proposed reduction in ICBM silos to 50 percent subject to 

receiving the nuclear force structure plan required by section 

1042(a) of the Fiscal Year 2012 National Defense Authorization 

Act, which is unacceptably almost 2 full years late. That plan 

would be required to include the various options under 

consideration for treaty implementation, along with a preferred 

final force structure option, which may be modified upon the 

conclusion of the environmental assessment. That plan would be 

accompanied by a report from the Commander of U.S. Strategic 

Command on his assessment of the force structure options 

provided by the Secretary of Defense, including the preferred 

final force structure option. Lastly, the Chairman of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff would be required to certify to the 

congressional defense committees that conducting the 

environmental assessment will not imperil the ability of the 

military to comply with the deployed or non-deployed force 

levels of the New START Treaty by February 2018. 

The agreement would prohibit the conversion of nuclear 

capable B-52 aircraft to conventional aircraft until the 

information required under subsection (b) is submitted, and 

requires that all B-52s in the inventory remain in a common 

conventional weapons employment capability configuration once 

nuclear decertification and modification commences for currently 

an undetermined quantity of B-52 aircraft.

The agreement would further require a report on 

collaboration between the Army, Navy, and Air Force on 

activities related to strategic systems to improve efficiencies, 

technology sharing, and other benefits.

The agreement would also express a sense of the Congress 

that the force structure required by the New START Treaty should 

preserve Minuteman III ballistic missile silos in a warm status 

and any non-deployed missiles and silos should be spread amongst 

the three missile wings in the Air Force ICBM force. 

Finally, the agreement would also include, in another 

section of this report accompanying section 4201, an explanatory 

statement on the budget for activities to prepare for the 

implementation of the New START Treaty. 

Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently 

targetable reentry vehicles (sec. 1057)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1056) that would 

require the Secretary of the Air Force to ensure that the Air 

Force is capable of deploying multiple independently targetable 

reentry vehicles to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic 

missiles (ICBM) and any ground-based strategic deterrent followon to such missiles. This section would require the Secretary 
166

to ensure that the Air Force is capable of commencing such 

deployment not later than 270 days after the date on which the 

President determines such deployment is necessary.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that changes the 270 days to 180 days and narrows the 

requirement to apply only to the Minuteman III ICBM system.

Report on New START Treaty (sec. 1058)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1059) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman, Joint Chiefs 

of Staff to jointly submit to the congressional defense 

committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 

Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 

Senate, a report on whether the New START Treaty is in the 

national security interests of the United States.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision. 

Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares 

Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report (sec. 

1059)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080A) that 

would require the Secretary of the Air Force to report on the 

implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear 

Weapons Accident Dose Evaluation Report released by the Air 

Force in April 2001.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would modify the deadline for the report from 180 

days to 1 year.

Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms reductions 

with the Russian Federation (sec. 1060)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1054) that would 

provide a statement of policy concerning implementation of 

further nuclear arms reductions below the levels of the New 

START Treaty, and would limit funds to make such reductions

unless certain conditions are met.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
167

The agreement includes a provision that would express the 

sense of Congress that, if the United States seeks further 

strategic nuclear arms reductions with the Russian Federation 

that are below the levels of the New START Treaty, such 

reductions should: (1) Be pursued through a mutually negotiated 

agreement; (2) Be verifiable; (3) Be pursued through the treatymaking power of the President; and (4) Take into account the 

full range of nuclear weapon capabilities that threaten the 

United States and its allies, including non-strategic nuclear 

weapon capabilities.

Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control treaty 

obligations (sec. 1061)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1055) that would 

express the sense of Congress that the President should consider 

not seeking further nuclear arms reductions with a foreign 

country that is in noncompliance with its nuclear arms control 

treaty obligations.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would express the 

sense of Congress that, if the President determines that a 

foreign nation is in substantial noncompliance with its nuclear

arms control treaty obligations in a manner that adversely 

affects the national security of the United States or its allies 

or alliances, the President should take certain specified steps. 

These steps include informing Congress of the President’s 

assessment of the effect of such noncompliance and the 

President’s plans to resolve such noncompliance. They also 

include considering whether, in light of the noncompliance, the 

United States should engage in future nuclear arms control 

negotiations with the noncompliant government, and considering 

the potential effect of the noncompliance on the consideration 

by the Senate of a future nuclear arms reduction treaty with the 

noncompliant government.

Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the nuclear 

forces of the United States (sec. 1062)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1044) that states it is the policy of the United States to 

modernize the nuclear triad and sustain the nuclear stockpile, 

its production facilities, and science base, and a sense of 

Congress expressing that Congress is committed to providing the 

resources needed for this modernization and that Congress 

supports the modernization or replacement of the triad of 
168

strategic nuclear delivery systems.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes an amendment that includes an 

additional sense of Congress supporting continued upgrades of 

the existing B-1B, B-2, and B-52 bomber aircraft, and that the 

Air Force should continue to prioritize the continued 

development and acquisition of the long-range strike bomber 

program.

Subtitle G–Miscellaneous Authorities and 

Limitations

Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to 

analyze captured records (sec. 1071)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1061) that would 

provide the statutory authority to the Secretary of Defense to 

establish a Conflict Records Research Center to facilitate 

research and analysis of records captured from countries, 

organizations, and individuals, now or once hostile, to the 

United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision, but recommended funding of the current center, which 

already exists at the National Defense University, for $1 

million in the budget request for fiscal year 2014.

The agreement includes the House provision.

We note that while such a center currently exists, 

additional statutory authorization would allow the center to be 

funded collectively by the Department of Defense, the Office of 

the Director of National Intelligence, and other departments and 

agencies, rather than rely on discrete partner funding for each 

activity. This authorization would also allow the center to 

receive funding from other agencies, states, or other foreign 

and domestic entities, including academic and philanthropic 

organizations, to support important research in international 

relations, counterterrorism, conventional warfare and 

unconventional warfare.

Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic 

spectrum (sec. 1072)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1051) that would require a national security spectrum 

strategy to be performed at least once every 5 years. The 

strategy is to provide near-term (5 years), mid-term (10 years), 

and long-term (30 years) assessments of the need for national 
169

security spectrum.

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment to title 10 of the United States Code, section 488, 

“Management of Electromagnetic spectrum: biennial strategic 

plan,” that requires the plan be submitted in consultation with 

the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of 

Commerce. The plan shall include an inventory of the 

electromagnetic spectrum uses for national security and other 

purposes, an estimate of the need for electromagnetic spectrum 

over the time periods of the Senate committee-reported 

provision, and any additional matters the Secretary of Defense, 

in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and 

the Secretary of Commerce, considers appropriate.

Extension of authority to provide military transportation 

services to certain other agencies at the Department of Defense 

reimbursement rate (sec. 1073)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1062) that would 

amend section 2642(a) of title 10, United States Code, to extend 

the authority to provide to other federal agencies airlift 

transportation at the same rate the Department of Defense (DOD) 

charges its own units for similar transportation and to expand 

the authority to include all means of transportation, not just 

airlift. The DOD currently uses this authority to: (1) provide 

transportation support to other departments and agencies to 

increase peacetime business, and (2) promote the improved use of 

airlift by filling excess capacity with paying cargo. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 313).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Notification of modifications to Army force structure (sec. 

1074)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1063) that would 

prevent the Department of the Army from spending any fiscal year 

2014 funds to modify the force structure or basing strategy of 

the Army until the Secretary of the Army submits the report 

required by section 1066 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1943).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement would require the Secretary of the Army to 

certify that Army force structure changes authorized as of the 

date of the enactment of this Act comply with the provisions of 
170

the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 

seq.). The provision would also require that as part of any 

congressional notifications of future force structure changes, 

in accordance with section 993 of title 10, United States Code, 

the Secretary should include an assessment whether or not such 

changes require an Environmental Assessment or Environmental 

Impact Statement.

Aircraft joint training (sec. 1075)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1065) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland 

Security, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 

Administration to develop and implement plans and procedures to 

review the potential of joint testing and evaluation of 

unmanned aircraft equipment and systems with other appropriate 

departments and agencies of the Federal Government that may 

serve the dual purpose of providing capabilities to the 

Department of Defense (DOD) to meet the future requirements of 

combatant commanders and, domestically, to strengthen 

international border security. The two secretaries and the 

Administrator would also be required to submit a report on the 

status of the plans within 270 days of the date of enactment of 

this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would express the sense of Congress that 

simulators offer cost savings to DOD, can contribute to training 

members of the armed services for combat, and highlights the 

need for synergy between the DOD and private sector.

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports

Online availability of reports submitted to Congress (sec. 1081)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1078) that would 

amend section 122a of title 10, United States Code, to require 

certain unclassified reports be made available on a publicly 

accessible website of the Department of Defense.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a technical 

amendment.

Oversight of combat support agencies (sec. 1082)
171

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1071) that would 

require that assessments of combat support agencies undertaken 

pursuant to section 193(a) of title 10, United States Code, be 

submitted to the congressional defense committees.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency 

coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology (sec. 

1083)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1072) that would 

modify current reporting requirements for humanitarian demining 

as defined within section 407(d) of title 10, United States 

Code, to include interagency, research, and development 

activities.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Repeal and modification of reporting requirements (sec. 1084)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1061) that would repeal or modify a number of reporting 

requirements that have been included in law in past years. The 

requirements recommended for repeal or modification in this 

provision are requirements identified by the committee as being 

no longer relevant or necessary and that can be repealed or 

modified without adversely affecting the committee’s oversight 

responsibilities.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying 

amendment.

Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of 

Department of Defense efficiencies (sec. 1085)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1074) that would 

repeal section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81), relating to the 

implementation of the efficiencies undertaken in 2010 by the 

Department of Defense.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision.
172

Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces 

and United States Special Operations Command (sec. 1086)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1076) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to review and assess the 

organization, missions, and authorities related to U.S. Special 

Operations Forces and U.S. Special Operations Command and to 

provide a report to the congressional defense committees.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment. 

Reports on unmanned aircraft systems (sec. 1087)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1077) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of 

Transportation, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 

Administration, and the Administrator of the National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, on behalf of the Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems (UAS) Executive Committee, to jointly submit a 

report on unmanned aircraft system collaboration, demonstration, 

use cases and data sharing to the appropriate committees of 

Congress within 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would extend the reporting deadline to 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Report on foreign language support contracts for the Department 

of Defense (sec. 1088)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1063) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to assess 

the Department’s current approach for managing foreign language 

support contracts.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

We note that at a minimum, the assessment shall include an 

analysis of spending for all the types of foreign language 

support services and products that have been acquired by the 

Department of Defense (DOD) components. Additionally, the 

assessment shall include a reevaluation, based on the results of 

the analysis of spending, of the scope of the DOD executive 

agent’s management of foreign language support contracts to 
173

determine whether any adjustments are needed.

Civil Air Patrol (sec. 1089)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1064) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to 

produce a report on the Civil Air Patrol (CAP) that would, among 

other things, identify the requirement for the total fleet of 

CAP aircraft.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Subtitle I—Other Matters

Technical and clerical amendments (sec. 1091)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1081) that would 

make a number of technical and clerical amendments of a nonsubstantive nature to existing law.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated 

information system programs (sec. 1092)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1083) that would 

give Department of Defense senior officials responsible for 

major automated information system programs the option of 

submitting to the congressional defense committees either a 

critical change report when required, or a streamlined 

notification when the official further concludes that the 

critical change occurred primarily due to congressional action, 

such as a reduction in program funding.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying 

amendment.

Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue 

non-premium aviation insurance (sec. 1093)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1084) that would 

amend section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, relating to 

the expiration of non-premium insurance under chapter 443 of 
174

that title, to extend the authority of the Secretary of 

Transportation to provide insurance and reinsurance.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and authority 

to waive reimbursement of costs of activities for certain 

nongovernmental personnel (sec. 1094)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1073) that would 

modify section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81), to extend the deadline 

for the required report of the Comptroller General of the United 

States from December 30, 2013, to December 30, 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

that would modify section 1081 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81) to 

extend the authority of the Secretary of Defense to advise 

foreign defense ministries for an additional 5 fiscal years. 

The provision would also extend the requirement of the Secretary 

of Defense to provide an annual report to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, 

and would provide the Comptroller General of the United States 

an additional year to conduct the evaluation of the 

effectiveness of the program under the original authority.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would extend the program through the end of 

fiscal year 2017. The agreement also extends, for 1 fiscal 

year, the authority of the Secretary of Defense to waive the 

reimbursement of costs requirement for certain nongovernmental 

personnel at the Department of Defense regional centers for 

security studies (as most recently amended section 941(b) of the 

Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2009).

Amendments to certain national commissions (sec. 1095)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1085) that would 

enable parity for compensation and ethics workday computations 

by decreasing and making optional the annual compensation rate 

for commissioners appointed to the National Commission on the 

Structure of the Air Force that was established in subtitle G of 

title III of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
175

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would make various technical changes to the 

Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission, 

enacted in sections 671 through 680 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239), 

including additional authorities for the Commission, extended 

timelines and milestones, and increased funding.

Strategy for future military information operations capabilities 

(sec. 1096)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1087) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement a 

strategy for developing and sustaining military information 

operations capabilities for future contingencies.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment. 

Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security (sec. 

1097)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1090) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to coordinate with the 

Secretary of Homeland Security on the transfer or long-term loan 

to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of excess 

Department of Defense (DOD) equipment that may be appropriate 

for use in efforts related to improving U.S. border security.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would express the 

sense of Congress that DOD and DHS should, consistent with 

existing laws and authorities, seek to collaborate on enhanced 

U.S. border security, including by identifying excess property 

of DOD, if any, that may be suitable for use by the DHS to 

support border security efforts. We believe such collaboration 

could be useful to increase situational awareness and to help 

achieve operational control of the international borders of the 

United States.

Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire 

suppression and other purposes; tactical airlift fleet of the 

Air Force (sec. 1098)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 131) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to 
176

consider, as part of the recapitalization of the tactical 

airlift fleet of the Air Force: (1) Upgrades to legacy C-130H 

aircraft designed to help such aircraft meet the fuel economy 

goals of the Air Force; and (2) Retention of such upgraded 

aircraft in the tactical airlift fleet. It would also require 

that the Secretary ensure that upgrades to the C-130H fleet are 

made in a manner that is proportional to the number of C-130H 

aircraft in the force structure of the active Air Force, the Air 

Force Reserve, and the Air National Guard.

 The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would add direction that: (1) The Secretary of 

the Army offer to transfer eight specific C-23Bs to the Governor 

of Alaska; (2) The Secretary of Defense transfer up to 15 C-23Bs 

to the Forest Service; (3) The Coast Guard transfer seven C-130s 

to the Air Force; (4) The Air Force modify the Coast Guard C130s to serve as firefighting tanker aircraft for the Forest 

Service; and (5) The Secretary of Defense transfer 14 C-27J 

aircraft to the Coast Guard upon completion of these actions. 

We also direct the Secretary of the Air Force and the 

Secretary of the Army to provide the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, not 

later than January 30, 2014, a quarterly report or briefing on 

the cost, schedule, and execution of notable events related to 

the aircraft transfers and modifications required within the 

provision. 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Department of Defense Readiness Restoration Fund

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1002) that would establish a Department of Defense (DOD) 

Readiness Restoration Fund in order to provide the DOD with 

increased flexibility to transfer funds that may be available to 

high priority readiness accounts, where necessary to address 

significant shortfalls in funding otherwise available for the 

training activities of the armed forces (including flying hours 

and steaming days) and the maintenance of military equipment.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the reductions in discretionary appropriations 

and direct spending accounts under section 251A of the Balanced 

Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) 

were never intended to take effect, the readiness of the 

Nation’s military is weakened by sequestration, sequestration 

has budgetary and cost impacts beyond the programmatic level, 
177

and there is limited information about these indirect costs to 

the Federal Government. It is the sense of Congress that the 

Government Accountability Office should report on the long-term 

budgetary costs and effects of sequestration, including on 

procurement activities and contracts with the Federal 

Government.

Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Counter-Narcotic 

Program

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1014) that would 

express the sense of Congress regarding the importance of the 

National Guard Counterdrug Program (CDP) as a tool in combating 

drug trafficking into the United States and the need for 

continued support and funding of such programs, especially along 

the Southwest border.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the Department of Defense requests funding 

annually to support the National Guard CDP. We believe that the 

CDP plays an important role in providing military-specific 

capabilities and expertise resident within the National Guard to 

support the counterdrug activities of federal, state, and local 

authorities. We believe this support has proven effective in 

helping to meet national counterdrug objectives. 

Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1023) that would 

amend section 7310 of title 10, United States Code, to require 

that naval vessels that do not have a designated homeport to be 

treated as homeported in the United States or Guam, and to 

change the definition of voyage repair. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We direct the Secretary of the Navy, not later than June 

30, 2014, to submit to the congressional defense committees a 

report on ship repair capabilities in Guam – including skilled 

personnel, equipment, and facilities – in support of Department 

of the Navy capabilities needed to sustain United States naval 

forces readiness in the Guam region.

Authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States 

for emergency or critical medical treatment
178

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1032) that would provide the Secretary of Defense the 

authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at the 

Guantanamo detention facility (GTMO) to a Department of Defense 

medical facility for the sole purpose of providing emergency or 

critical medical treatment if such treatment is not available at 

GTMO and is necessary to prevent death or imminent significant 

injury or harm to the individual’s health. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Assessment of affiliates and adherents of Al-Qaeda outside the 

United States

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1036) that would 

require an assessment of any group operating outside the United 

States that is an affiliate or adherent of, or otherwise related 

to, Al Qaeda; a summary of relevant information relating to each 

such group; an assessment of whether each group is part of or 

substantially supporting Al Qaeda or the Taliban, or constitutes 

an associated force that is engaged in hostilities against the 

United States or its coalition partners; and the criteria used 

to determine the nature and extent of each group's relationship 

to Al Qaeda.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We direct the Secretary of Defense, not later than 120 days 

after the enactment of this Act, to provide a briefing to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives that provides definitions and the processes to 

determine if an entity is an affiliate, associated force and/or 

an adherent of al Qaeda or the Taliban; and an assessment of the 

groups or entities that the Department considers to be 

affiliates or adherents of al Qaeda.

In consultation with the committees of jurisdiction over 

the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 110-40), 

we direct the Secretary of State to provide the same briefing to 

the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives on 

the aforementioned matters.

Designation of Department of Defense senior official for 

facilitating the transfer of individuals detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 
179

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1037) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to designate a senior official 

within the Department of Defense (DOD) with principal 

responsibility for the coordination and management of the 

transfer of individuals detained at U.S. Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We note 

that the Secretary of Defense appointed the senior DOD official 

responsible for coordinating and managing transfers of 

Guantanamo detainees in October 2013. 

Summary of information relating to individuals detained at 

Guantanamo who became leaders of foreign terrorist groups

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040A) that 

would require the public release of summary information on 

individuals formerly detained at United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who have, since being transferred or 

released from such detention, become leaders or involved in the 

leadership structure of a foreign terrorist group.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Procedures governing United States citizens apprehended inside 

the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of 

Military Force

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040B) that 

would affirm the availability of the writ of habeas corpus for 

any U.S. citizen apprehended inside the United States pursuant 

to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–

40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), and set out certain procedural 

requirements for any habeas proceeding brought by such a U.S. 

citizen. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Prohibition on the use of funds for recreational facilities for 

individuals detained at Guantanamo

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040C) that 

would prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to provide 

additional or upgraded recreational facilities for individuals 
180

detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Prohibition on transfer or release of individuals detained at 

Guantanamo to Yemen 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040D) that 

would prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to 

transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release, of any 

individual detained at Guantanamo to the Republic of Yemen or

any entity within Yemen during the period beginning on the date 

of enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Department of Defense representation in dispute resolution 

regarding surrender of Department of Defense bands of 

electromagnetic frequencies

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1052) that would amend section 1062(b)(1) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–

65) to require that the Department of Defense be adequately 

represented to convey its views with the interagency process for 

spectrum allocation.

The House bill contained no similar amendment.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People’s Republic 

of China

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1057) that would 

amend section 1045(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to extend the date of 

the required assessment until August 15, 2014. The section 

would also provide not more than 75 percent of the funds made 

available to the Office of the Secretary of Defense for travel 

may be obligated or expended until 30 days after the Secretary 

notifies the appropriate congressional committees that the 

assessment has begun. 

The agreement does not include this provision.

Subsequent to passage by the House of H.R. 1960, the 

Department of Defense entered into a contract with the Institute 

for Defense Analyses (IDA) to carry out the requirement of 
181

section 1045(b). We have been informed that IDA was given 

notice to proceed on this work on September 18, 2013, and will 

be required to submit to the Department its draft report on July 

1, 2014, with a formal final report to be submitted by August 

29, 2014. We look forward to the report assembled by IDA and 

its panel of independent experts. 

Cost estimates for nuclear weapons

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1058) that would 

amend section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) to include in the 

annual report required by such section a detailed estimate of 

the personnel costs associated with sustaining and modernizing 

the nuclear deterrent and nuclear weapons stockpile of the 

United States. The annual report would also be required to 

describe how and which locations were included in the cost 

estimate. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Report on plans for the disposition of the Mine Resistant Ambush 

Protected vehicle fleet

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1062) that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

provide a report on the Department’s analysis and plans for the 

disposition and sustainment of its fleet of Mine Resistant 

Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Limitation on use of funds for public-private cooperation 

activities

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1064) that would 

prohibit the obligation or expenditure of funds for any publicprivate cooperation activity by a combatant command until the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives receive the Defense Business Board report that 

the Secretary of Defense was directed to provide under the 

committee report accompanying H.R. 4310 of the 112th Congress (H. 

Rept. 112-479).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We note 
182

that the specified report was received by the committees in 

October 2013. We encourage the Secretary of Defense to ensure 

that the proper guidance and procedures are in place for such 

public-private cooperation activities by the combatant commands 

and to consult regularly with the committees regarding the 

proper scope and implementation of such activities. 

Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013 Quadrennial 

Defense Review

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1075) that would 

require the National Defense Panel (NDP) established pursuant to 

subsection 118(f) of title 10, United States Code, to assess the 

recommendation of the 2009 Quadrennial Defense Review 

Independent Panel (QDRIP), to establish a standing, independent 

strategic review panel.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Under the provisions of section 118(f)(9)(A) of title 10, 

United States Code, the heads of departments and agencies of the 

Department of Defense are required, upon request, to cooperate 

with the NDP to ensure that information it considers necessary 

to carry out its duties is promptly provided to the maximum 

extent practical. It is particularly important for the NDP to 

have access, upon request, to information, including appropriate 

access to previous studies, data, assumptions, scenarios, 

analysis, and recommendations related to the Department's series 

of recent strategy and program reviews such as the Defense 

Strategic Guidance, Strategic Choices and Management Review, and 

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Risk Assessment.

Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency operation 

plan information to Congress

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1079) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to provide to the congressional 

defense committees an annual report containing summaries of the 

Secretary's defense planning guidance and guidance to the 

Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff for contingency operation plans. 

This provision would also prohibit the obligation or expenditure 

of 75 percent of the funds, authorized to be appropriated for 

operation and maintenance, defense-wide, for the Office of the 

Secretary of Defense, until the Secretary of Defense submits the 

first report.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
183

The agreement does not include this provision.

Last year’s statement of managers to accompany the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-

239) directs the Secretary of Defense, upon request, to provide 

the congressional defense committees with a briefing that 

describes the defense planning guidance, as required by section 

113 of title 10, United States Code, and from which the budget 

request submitted was developed. Such a briefing is 

particularly important now given the significant changes in the 

strategic and fiscal plans currently under consideration by the 

Department. For this reason we expect the Department to provide 

the required briefing, upon request, with regard to existing 

defense policy guidance used for the Department's fiscal year 

2014 budget request. This briefing will serve as a baseline to 

help the committees understand any changes to the guidance that 

may be adopted in the course of the current review and to assist 

with the oversight and assessment of any subsequent strategic or 

budgetary changes.

Report on U.S. citizens subject to military detention

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to provide an annual report on 

U.S. citizens subject to military detention. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision.

Report on long-term costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom and 

Operation Enduring Freedom 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080B) that 

would require the President to submit to Congress a report 

containing an estimate of the previous costs of Operation New 

Dawn and the long-term costs of Operation Enduring Freedom. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Report on air transportation of supplies for the United States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1082) that 

would: (1) Modify section 2631a of title 10, United States Code, 

to provide a preference for Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF) 

aircraft for the transportation of Department of Defense (DOD) 

supplies; (2) Require the DOD to submit an annual report 

regarding use of outsize and oversize cargo flights; and (3) 
184

Amend chapter 401 of title 49, United States Code, to direct at 

least 50 percent of the gross tonnage of the equipment, 

materials, or commodities that are procured, contracted, or 

subcontracted for by the U.S. Government to be transported by 

CRAF aircraft.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision.

We agree that the Secretary of Defense should provide a 

report to the congressional defense committees within 180 days 

of enactment of this Act that includes assessments of the 

following: 

(1) The effects on CRAF carriers of section 41106 of 

title 49, United States Code, and that section’s ability to 

help the Secretary of Defense support the goals of the 

National Airlift Policy and maintain an adequate industrial 

base for CRAF carriers;

(2) The percentages of the gross tonnage of the 

equipment, materials, or commodities transported on fixed 

wing aircraft broken out by organic airlift and specific 

commercial carriers; 

(4) The volume of outsize and oversize cargo flights, 

to include requirements and procedures;

(5) The ability of CRAF carriers to meet requirements 

to transport any equipment, materials, or commodities for 

the use of U.S. military operations and respond to a 

humanitarian disaster; and

(6) Current waiver authorities and whether there is 

any need to change those authorities to help the Secretary 

of Defense support the goals of the National Airlift Policy 

and maintain an adequate industrial base for CRAF carriers.

Transportation of supplies to members of the Armed Forces from 

nonprofit organizations

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1082A) that 

would insert a new section after section 402 in title 10, United 

States Code, to allow the Secretary of Defense to transport, on 

a space available basis and without charge, supplies that have 

been furnished by a nonprofit organization and that are intended 

for distribution to members of the armed forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision.

The Secretary of Defense informed us that he already has 

the authority to accept donations and gifts for the benefit of 

our armed forces, but that the Department of Defense has very 
185

limited resources to receive, screen, and transport donations 

and gifts. 

Protection of tier one task critical assets from electromagnetic 

pulse and high-powered microwave systems

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1086) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to certify to the congressional 

defense committees that certain defense critical assets are 

protected from the adverse effects of electromagnetic pulses 

(EMP) and high-powered microwave (HPM) systems, and to prepare a 

plan to ensure protected electrical power for any such assets 

that are not certified.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

We note that the Department of Defense (DOD) has in place 

well-documented policies and practices for the protection of 

defense critical infrastructure against a wide variety of 

potential threats and hazards. This all-hazards risk mitigation 

and protection approach covers both natural phenomena and manmade hazards and attacks, including EMP and potential electrical 

power disruption, and considers both the probability and 

severity of potential hazards.

The Department’s Defense Critical Infrastructure Protection 

(DCIP) program is focused on mission assurance to meet DOD 

needs. It performs recurring analyses of infrastructure 

vulnerability and risk mitigation options to reduce 

vulnerability and enhance mission assurance in a cost-effective 

manner. These assessments result in prioritized plans to 

mitigate risks to defense critical infrastructure, which changes 

as mission requirements change and as additional redundancy is 

established. The Department then takes appropriate risk 

mitigation steps according to these prioritized plans. 

In reviewing the methodology supporting this 

prioritization, we believe DCIP has institutionalized a process 

that can address the type of certification process called for in 

the House provision, without injecting unwarranted redundant 

assessment or planning processes. We expect the DOD to continue 

using the DCIP program to review its assets against EMP and 

other emerging threats to ensure ongoing protection efforts 

supporting mission assurance. We expect the Department to keep 

the congressional defense committees apprised of any significant 

updates or changes to the DCIP program, as well as to the status 

of any specific infrastructure assets assessed to have a 

critical vulnerability to EMP, as they conduct future 

assessments.
186

While we believe the Department has a good process for 

evaluating the risks and mitigation measures for EMP through the 

DCIP program, we believe that a better understanding of the 

intelligence community’s views on the threats posed by EMP or 

HPM systems would be helpful in understanding what more might be 

done by DOD to enhance its protective posture. Therefore, we 

direct the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency to 

provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

Senate and the House of Representatives, within 60 days of the 

enactment of this Act, on the threats posed to DOD 

infrastructure by the natural occurrence or intentional use of 

EMP or HPM effects.

Compliance of military departments with minimum safe staffing 

standards 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1088) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that all military 

departments comply with Department of Defense Fire and Emergency 

Services Program policy requirements on safe staffing.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

Determination and disclosure of transportation costs incurred by 

Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United 

States

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1089) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to determine the cost of the 

transportation provided in the case of a trip taken by a member, 

officer, or employee of the House of Representatives or Senate 

in carrying out official duties outside the United States for 

which the Department of Defense provides transportation and to 

provide a written statement of the cost not later than 10 days 

after completion of the trip to the member, officer, or employee 

involved and to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate or 

the House of Representatives. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We support public disclosure of official foreign travel by 

members, officers, and employees of the House of Representatives 

and Senate. To this end, we note that section 1754 (b) of title 

22, United States Code, contains reporting and disclosure 

requirements for congressional travel outside the United States, 

including a requirement for reports to be open to public 
187

inspection and published in the Congressional Record. We 

recognize there are circumstances under which transportation 

provided by the Department of Defense best meets the needs of 

congressional delegations, ranging from protecting the safety 

and security of the delegation to expediency and accessing 

destinations that have little to no commercial air service. We 

further note that the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives each maintain policies and 

processes to provide further oversight of travel requests by 

members and employees of the committees. 

Transfer to the Department of Homeland Security of the Tethered 

Aerostat Radar System 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1091) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to transfer to the Department 

of Homeland Security the Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the transfer of the TARS program took place 

after the House bill was written.

Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security 

activities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1092) that would 

amend section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, to permit 

the Secretary of Defense to transfer personal property to border 

security activities in consultation with the Secretary of 

Homeland Security.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

We note that that the Department of Homeland Security can 

participate in the sale or donation of excess personal property 

for border security activities under the current law.

We direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

conduct a study of the Department of Defense's process for 

disposing of surplus personal property, focusing on: (1) an 

overview of how the disposal process works in practice; (2) the 

means used to dispose of surplus property; and (3) 

recommendations to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of 

the current disposal process.

Unmanned aircraft systems and National Airspace
188

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1093) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to enter into a memorandum of 

understanding with a non-Department of Defense entity that is 

engaged in the test range program authorized under section 

332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public 

Law 112-95) to allow such entity access to non-regulatory 

special use airspace if such access: (1) is used by the entity 

as part of such test range program; and (2) does not interfere 

with the activities of the Secretary or otherwise interrupt or 

delay missions or training of the Department of Defense (DOD). 

The underlying Act authorized the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to identify up to six test ranges at which 

interested parties could develop and test procedures under which 

the FAA might allow access to the National Airspace System on a 

routine basis. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

However, we agree that: (1) developing established 

procedures to integrate unmanned aircraft systems into the 

National Airspace System will be very important in allowing both 

DOD and non-DOD entities to train with and operate these systems 

on a routine basis; and (2) developing these procedures could 

include the use of FAA-designated DOD non-regulatory special use 

airspace.

Days on which the POW/MIA flag is displayed on certain federal 

property

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1094) that would 

require that, on federal installations, the National League of 

Families POW/MIA Flag be displayed on all days on which the flag 

of the United States is displayed.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Sense of Congress on improvised explosive devices 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1095) that would 

express the sense of Congress on the use of improvised explosive 

devices against members of the United States Armed Forces or 

people of the United States.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 
189

Sense of Congress to maintain a strong National Guard and 

Military Reserve force

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1096) that would 

express the sense of Congress that (1) the Secretary of Defense 

should make every effort to ensure the Military Reserve and 

National Guard forces are sustained by a fully-manned and fullyfunded force and that the United States fulfill its longstanding 

commitment to unyielding readiness in terms of defense; (2) the 

Secretary of Defense should act with the knowledge that the 

National Guard and Reserves are critical components of the armed 

forces, particularly as a means of preserving combat power 

during a time of budget austerity; and (3) Congress repudiates 

proposals to diminish the National Guard or Reserves and affirms 

the growth of these components as circumstances warrant. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Access of employees of congressional support offices to 

Department of Defense facilities

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1097) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to provide employees of any 

congressional support office who work on issues related to 

national security with access to facilities of the Department of 

Defense in the same manner, and subject to the same terms and 

conditions, as employees of the Committees on Armed Services of 

the Senate and the House of Representatives. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We encourage the Secretary of Defense to implement 

procedures for providing Pentagon access to employees of 

congressional support offices similar to the procedures 

currently used to provide access to Government Accountability 

Office employees and to keep the Committees on Armed Services of 

the Senate and the House of Representatives informed of the 

progress of implementing such procedures. 

Cost of wars

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1098) that would 

require the Department of Defense to post on its public web site 

the costs of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 
190

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that reports on the costs of the wars in 

Afghanistan and Iraq have been published by the Congressional 

Budget Office (CBO) and the Congressional Research Service 

(CRS). We further note that CBO reports are publicly available 

and published on the Internet, and CRS reports are available to

Members of Congress.

Sense of Congress regarding consideration of foreign languages 

and cultures in the building of partner capacity

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099) that would 

express the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense 

(DOD) should take into consideration foreign languages and 

cultures in DOD’s training, tools and methodologies for 

military-to-military activities and building partner capacity. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We 

encourage the DOD to incorporate the consideration of foreign 

languages and cultures into its training and procedures for 

engaging in and benefiting from military-to-military cooperation 

and building partner capacity activities. 

Sense of Congress regarding preservation of second amendment 

rights of active duty military personnel stationed or residing 

in the District of Columbia

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099A) that 

would express the sense of Congress that active duty military 

personnel who are stationed or residing in the District of 

Columbia should be permitted to exercise fully their rights 

under the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States and therefore should be exempt from the District of 

Columbia’s restrictions on the possession of firearms.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

TITLE XI–CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on 

premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian 

employees working overseas (sec. 1101)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1101) that would 

authorize the head of an executive agency to waive limitations 
191

on the aggregate of basic and premium pay payable through 

calendar year 2014 to an employee who performs work in an 

overseas location that is in the area of responsibility of the 

Commander, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), or a location that 

was formerly in CENTCOM but has been moved to an area of 

responsibility of the Commander, U.S. Africa Command, in support 

of a contingency operation or an operation in response to a 

declared emergency. The amount payable may not exceed the total 

annual compensation payable to the Vice President under section 

104 of title 3, United States Code.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant 

allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official 

duty in a combat zone (sec. 1102)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1102) that would 

authorize temporary discretionary authority to federal agencies 

to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities comparable to 

those provided to members of the foreign service to an agency’s 

civilian employees on official duty in a combat zone. This 

authority would expire at the end of fiscal year 2015.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision. 

Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian 

employees of the Department of Defense (sec. 1103)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1103) that would 

amend section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States Code, to 

extend through September 30, 2015, the authority of the 

Secretary of Defense or the secretary of a military department 

to allow certain civilian employees to volunteer for reductionin-force separations.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1101) that would amend section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, 

United States Code, to extend through September 30, 2018, the 

authority of the Secretary of Defense or the secretary of a 

military department to allow certain civilian employees to 

volunteer for reduction-in-force separations.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to 

Department of Defense employees (sec. 1104)
192

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1104) that would 

amend section 5595(i)(4) of title 5, United States Code, to 

extend until October 1, 2018, the authority for the Secretary of 

Defense or the secretary of a military department to pay the 

total amount of severance pay to an eligible civilian employee 

in one lump sum.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1102).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of 

Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation 

(SMART) Defense Education Program and assessment of STEM and 

other programs (sec. 1105)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1105) that would 

increase the flexibility of the Secretary of Defense to 

determine the amount of the financial assistance delivered by 

the Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation 

(SMART) program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1105).

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment requiring an assessment of the SMART program, as well 

as for the National Security Science and Engineering Faculty 

Fellowship (NSSEFF) program, and a number of Department of 

Defense Pre-Kindergarten through 12th grade Science, Technology, 

Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) programs.

Extension of program for exchange of information-technology 

personnel (sec. 1106)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1106) that would 

authorize for an additional 10 years the Information Technology 

Exchange Program for the Department of Defense.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 

that would authorize for an additional 5 years the Information 

Technology Exchange Program for the Department of Defense.

Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of 

Defense research and engineering facilities (sec. 1107)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1107) that would 

establish new authorities for the direct hiring and management 
193

of personnel at Department of Defense (DOD) Science and 

Technology Reinvention Laboratories. Specific elements 

addressed qualified candidates possessing a bachelor’s degree, 

qualified veterans, students, members of the Senior Executive 

Service (SES), Senior Scientific Technical Managers (SSTM), and 

specially qualified scientific and professional personnel (known 

as ST).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1107) that contained a number of similar elements of the 

House provision, namely the direct hiring authority for 

qualified candidates possessing a bachelor’s degree as well as 

qualified veteran candidates.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that removes elements relating to students, SESs, and 

STs.

We note that there have been concerns raised about the 

management of the senior scientific and technical workforce 

within DOD laboratories. Therefore, we direct the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness to submit a 

briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives within 90 days of the enactment of 

this Act on challenges to the management of the scientific and 

technical workforce of the Department, and recommendations for 

possible actions to improve such management. In preparing this 

briefing, the Under Secretary shall work with the relevant 

science and technology executives and personnel leadership in 

the Services to identify challenges to this workforce and 

examine opportunities to change policies and practices to 

improve the effectiveness and efficiencies of management 

procedures and practices. We note that DOD laboratories need to 

have streamlined, effective, and efficient personnel system 

practices in order to be competitive employers of world-class 

scientific and technical talent.

Furthermore, as a subset of this review, we believe that 

the Department should also examine the mechanisms for bringing 

in interns and other undergraduate students from cooperative 

education programs into the Department’s laboratories to 

determine if existing means are effective, and to propose any 

changes that might be necessary to improve those programs.

Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for 

civilian personnel (sec. 1108)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1108) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations, no 

later than 45 days after the enactment of this Act, implementing 

the authority provided in subsection (a) of section 1111 of the 
194

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 

Law 111-84).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to prescribe 

regulations, no later than 90 days after the enactment of this 

Act, implementing the authority provided in subsection (a) of 

section 1111 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010.

Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for 

civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured 

members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1109)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1109) that would 

amend section 1599c of title 10, United States Code, to extend 

through December 31, 2020, the existing authority of the 

Secretary of Defense to exercise any authority for the 

appointment and pay of health care personnel under chapter 74 of 

title 38, United States Code, for purposes of recruitment, 

employment, and retention of civilian health care professionals 

for the Department of Defense. The provision would repeal the 

now-obsolete section 1599c requirement for the service 

secretaries to develop and implement a strategy to disseminate 

the authorities and best practices for the recruitment of 

medical and health professionals. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1104).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Flexibility in employment and compensation of civilian faculty 

at certain additional Department of Defense schools

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1106) that would amend section 1595(c) of title 10, United 

States Code, to add the Defense Institute for Security 

Assistance Management and the Joint Special Operations 

University to the list of Department of Defense schools at which 

the Secretary of Defense may employ and compensate civilian 

faculty as the Secretary considers necessary.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the Department of Defense and the military 

departments have proposed changes over the past several years to 
195

extend the use of civilian faculty employed under title 10, 

United States Code, at Department of Defense schools and 

Professional Military Education (PME) programs that provide less 

than 10 months of academic instruction. We believe the 

Department and the Services have not applied adequate rigorous 

analysis of and justification for these requests. Section 1124 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 

and 1991 (Public Law 101-189) expanded the authority to employ 

civilian faculty at PME schools beyond the Naval War College to 

the National Defense University, the Army War College and United 

States Army Command and General Staff College, the Marine Corps 

Command and Staff College and Air University for principal 

courses of instruction of at least 10 months. As stated in the 

Report of the Panel on Military Education of the One Hundredth 

Congress of the Committee on Armed Services, House of 

Representatives, the intent of the expansion was that 

intermediate and senior PME schools were graduate level programs 

of instruction and civilian instructors were key to maintaining 

a high quality of instruction. The panel believed competitive 

civilian faculty could help attract other quality faculty from 

civilian education institutions and add depth to the curriculum, 

thus improving the quality of instruction. We believe this 

principle still applies in today’s environment and that the 

employment of civilian faculty under title 10, United States 

Code, at PME institutions and schools should be reserved for 

courses of instruction that are graduate level in nature. 

Therefore, we direct the Secretary of Defense to review the 

civilian faculty requirements for all Department of Defense and 

PME schools, universities, and institutes to determine if there 

are graduate level courses of instruction that are less than 10 

months in duration that may be authorized the employment of 

civilian faculty under title 10, United States Code. The review 

should include by-program justification for the utilization of 

civilian instructors rather than military instructors or 

contract instructors, and an accompanying cost-benefit analysis. 

The Secretary of Defense shall submit the findings of the review 

and any recommendations for changes to the employment of 

civilian faculty to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

Senate and the House of Representatives no later than March 1, 

2015.

TITLE XII–MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN 

NATIONS

Subtitle A-Assistance and Training
196

Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to 

build the capacity of foreign military forces (sec. 1201)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1201) that would 

extend and modify the authority under section 1206 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public 

Law 109-163), as amended, to conduct a program to build the 

capacity of foreign military forces to conduct counterterrorism 

operations or stability operations (the “global train and equip 

program”). The provision would expand the purposes for which 

train and equip assistance may be provided under this program, 

and expand the types of security forces that may receive such 

assistance. The provision would also require that information 

be submitted, as part of the annual budget justification 

materials, on the planning and execution of the global train and 

equip program for the coming fiscal year. The limitation on 

funds available for the program would be increased from $350.0 

million to $425.0 million per fiscal year, and the termination 

of the program would be extended until September 30, 2016. 

Finally, the House provision would repeal existing authorities 

for training and equipping counterterrorism forces in Yemen and 

East Africa. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1201) that would extend the authority for the global train 

and equip program through fiscal year 2018 and require a report 

on counterterrorism-related assistance under the program. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would maintain the current purposes for which 

train and equip assistance may be provided under the program, 

specifically building capability relating to the conduct of 

counterterrorism operations, and military and stability 

operations in conjunction with U.S. forces. The amendment would 

expand the types of forces that may receive assistance under the 

program to include a foreign country’s security forces with a 

counterterrorism mission. We recognize that in certain 

countries the lead counterterrorism unit is not located in the 

Ministry of Defense (MOD). 

The provision included in the agreement would also limit 

the level of funding available annually for the global train and 

equip program to $350.0 million and extend the authority for the 

program through fiscal year 2017. In addition, funds available 

for fiscal year 2015 would be restricted to no more than $262.5 

million until the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of 

the Secretary of State, submits a non-binding report on the 

proposed planning and execution of fiscal year 2015 programs 

intended to be conducted or supported under the authority to 

build the capacity of a foreign country’s security forces, other 
197

than MOD forces, to conduct counterterrorism operations.

The provision in the agreement would include the reporting 

requirement from the Senate provision regarding 

counterterrorism-related assistance, but would not include the 

House provision’s repeal of existing authorities for training 

and equipping security forces in Yemen and East Africa.

Global Security Contingency Fund (sec. 1202)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1203) that would 

make certain technical amendments to the authority for the 

Global Security Contingency Fund (GSCF) under section 1207 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

(Public Law 112-81), including changes to the notification 

requirements. The provision would also require a report to the 

specified congressional committees on the guidance and processes 

for the GSCF. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1202) making technical changes to GSCF. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

and clarifying amendment. 

We are concerned about the procedures and processes for 

implementation of the GSCF program and the coordination of GSCF

activities with other programs for building partner capacity. 

Therefore, the Comptroller General is directed to conduct a 

review of the procedures and processes established by the 

Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of State (DOS) to 

administer and implement activities funded by GSCF. 

Specifically, the Comptroller General is directed to review: 

(1) The process for the DOS and DOD, including the 

defense agencies and the combatant commands, to identify 

proposed GSCF activities; 

(2) The extent to which DOD, in conjunction with DOS, 

has procedures in place to review, prioritize, and approve 

activities to be funded through GSCF and coordinate those 

activities with other programs to build partner capacity; 

and 

(3) The extent to which DOD, in conjunction with DOS, 

has developed a monitoring and evaluation framework to 

measure the effectiveness of the activities implemented and 

funded by the GSCF. 

The Comptroller General is directed to submit the report 

containing the findings of this review to the relevant 

congressional committees by October 1, 2014. For purposes of 

this requirement, the relevant congressional committees are the 

Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Relations, and 

Appropriations of the Senate and the Committees on Armed 
198

Services, Foreign Affairs, and Appropriations of the House of 

Representatives.

Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed 

Forces with military and other security forces of friendly 

foreign countries (sec. 1203)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1203) that would permit the Secretary of Defense to 

authorize training with the military forces or other security 

forces of a friendly foreign country in order to prepare the 

U.S. armed forces to train the military forces or other security 

forces of a friendly foreign country and enhance 

interoperability. Training with foreign military forces under 

this authority must be in the U.S. national interest and 

consistent with U.S. national security strategy as well as the 

recent presidential guidance on security sector assistance.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would: (1) Modify elements of the annual 

reporting requirement; (2) Add a section relating to the types 

of training authorized; (3) Provide for coordination and 

concurrence of the Secretary of State; (4) Establish a 

notification requirement; and (5) Define for purposes of the 

delivery of the annual report the appropriate congressional 

committees.

We are concerned about the deteriorating readiness of U.S. 

general purpose forces, particularly ground forces, to conduct 

their mission-essential tasks. We intend to monitor the 

execution of this authority closely and expect activities 

authorized by this provision to be used in a way that most 

effectively supports the readiness requirements of U.S. forces.

Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of 

foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of 

mass destruction (sec. 1204)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1205) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense, in concurrence with the 

Secretary of State, to provide assistance to the military and 

civilian response organizations of certain foreign countries in

the region around Syria in order for such countries to respond 

effectively to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1206) that would authorize the Secretary of 

Defense to provide such assistance to foreign nations, without 

limiting the assistance to countries in the region around Syria.
199

The agreement includes a provision that would incorporate 

elements of each bill provision. It would provide the authority 

for the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance to the 

military and civilian first responder organizations of the 

nations that border Syria, and to provide such assistance to 

other nations if the Secretary notifies the congressional 

defense committees of the Secretary’s intention to do so. The 

provision would also require reports for each year in which the 

authority is used, including details on the assistance provided 

and the costs incurred. The provision would also require the 

Secretary to provide notification if the Secretary plans to use 

more than $4.0 million for the program in a fiscal year. 

Finally, the authority provided in the provision would expire 

after September 30, 2017.

Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program (sec. 

1205)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1204) that would 

codify the National Guard State Partnership Program in chapter 1 

of title 32, United States Code.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, in 

consultation with the Secretary of State, to establish a program 

for bilateral or multilateral military-to-military exchanges 

with the National Guard of a State or territory and the national 

military forces of a foreign nation (“State Partnership 

Program”). The provision would also require the publication of 

new regulations to modify existing regulation to conform to this 

new authority; provide certain authorization for the payment of 

expenses; require a series of notifications and reports; repeal 

Section 1210 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 

107 note); and establish a sunset of the underlying authority at

the end of fiscal year 2016.

We intend for engagement with other than the military 

forces to be focused – to the maximum extent - on disaster 

response or emergency response. For military-to-military 

engagement, we anticipate that annual reporting may be done in 

tabular format, but that the Department of Defense should 

provide a sufficient level of information so that extensive 

follow-up is not required. This authority is in no way intended 

to preclude National Guard personnel from engaging with 

partnered forces under other Department of Defense and State 

Department authorities, for example, Joint Combined Exchange 
200

Training (10 U.S.C. 2011) and implementation of Foreign Military 

Financing programs (22 U.S.C. 2752).

United States security and assistance strategies in Africa (sec. 

1206)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1204) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to 

develop a strategic framework for U.S. counterterrorism 

assistance and cooperation in North Africa, including but not 

limited to programs conducted under the Trans-Sahara Counter 

Terrorism Partnership, Operation Enduring Freedom-Trans Sahara, 

and other related security assistance activities. The provision 

would also require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report 

to Congress on the details of this framework, as well as on 

lessons-learned from recent developments in Mali and the region. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical and clarifying amendment. The agreement also includes 

provisions that would: (1) Require an interagency strategy that 

supports the recent security and political gains in Somalia; (2) 

Require a classified intelligence assessment on al Shabaab; and 

(3) Designate an existing senior U.S. Government official with 

existing interagency authority for export policy for Africa to 

coordinate among various U.S. Government agencies existing 

export strategies with the goal of significantly increasing U.S. 

exports to Africa.

We also acknowledge that the number of armed robbery at sea 

and piracy attacks in the Gulf of Guinea are increasing, with an 

ongoing pattern of cargo thefts and robbery, often occurring in 

the territorial waters of West and Central African states. 

Ongoing piracy and armed robbery at sea in the Gulf of Guinea 

pose a threat to international navigation, security, and the 

economic development of states in the region. It has been the 

U.S. strategy to improve the region's trade competitiveness and 

encourage the diversification of exports beyond natural 

resources. No later than 90 days after enactment of this Act, 

we direct the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives on the Department of Defense strategy to use its 

existing authorities to build capacity to combat armed robbery 

at sea, piracy, and other maritime threats.

We further note the importance of bringing to justice those 

individuals who committed, conspired to commit, attempted to 

commit, or aided or abetted in the commission of the September 

11-12, 2012, terrorist attack on the Special Mission Compound 

and Annex in Benghazi, Libya. We note that, in January 2013, 
201

the Secretary of State has authorized a reward of up to $10 

million for information leading to the arrest of those 

individuals.

Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security 

operations (sec. 1207)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1205) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, upon 

a determination from the President that it is in the national 

security interests of the United States, to use up to $75.0 

million of amounts authorized for the Coalition Support Fund 

account in fiscal years 2013 and 2014 to support the border

security operations of the Jordanian Armed Forces.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, with 

the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to provide assistance 

- on a reimbursable basis - to the Government of Jordan for 

purposes of supporting their armed forces efforts to increase 

security along the border between Jordan and Syria. Prior to 

any reimbursement, the provision would require the Secretary of 

Defense that the Government of Jordan is continuing to support 

and maintain efforts of the armed forces of Jordan to increase 

security or sustain increased security along the border between 

Jordan and Syria. Upon such certification, the Secretary of 

Defense may provide up to $150.0 million from fiscal year 2014 

funds, to be expended in fiscal years 2014 and 2015.

Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm 

the Lord's Resistance Army (sec. 1208)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1207) that would authorize the Department of Defense to 

obligate not more than $50.0 million in each fiscal year in 

operation and maintenance funding to provide logistical support, 

services and supplies, and intelligence support to: (1) The 

national military forces of Uganda participating in operations 

to mitigate or eliminate the threat posed by the Lord's 

Resistance Army (LRA); and (2) The national military forces of 

any other countries determined by the Secretary of Defense, with 

the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to be participating 

in operations to mitigate or eliminate the threat posed by the 

LRA. The Secretary's authority would expire upon the termination 

of Operation Observant Compass.

The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 1206).

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 
202

amendment that would: (1) Extend the underlying authority 

through the end of fiscal year 2017; (2) Require the Secretary 

of Defense to submit a report relating to various matters 

associated with the ongoing operation to support foreign forces; 

and (3) Prohibit utilizing 25 percent of the underlying 

provision until the Secretary submits the required report to 

Congress.

We note that the support provided by U.S. military advisors 

was unnecessarily restricted due to interpretation of a combat 

exclusion clause and therefore removed it from the existing 

authority. We believe that U.S. military advisers should assist 

their partners with the full-range of activities short of direct 

combat. We note this provision expands the previous authority 

and increases the authorized funding level to $50.0 million to 

provide in-the-field advice, assistance and support to foreign 

forces searching for Joseph Kony and his senior lieutenants, 

thereby strengthening the training and capabilities of the 

foreign forces to counter the LRA’s capabilities in the region. 

With this expanded authority, we expect the Department of 

Defense to continue their progress towards the mission 

objectives of Operation Observant Compass. We remain fully 

supportive of this advise and assist operation.

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Afghanistan, 

Pakistan, and Iraq

Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan (sec. 

1211)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1213) that would 

extend through fiscal year 2014 the authority under section 1201 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

(Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1619), as amended, for the 

Commanders’ Emergency Response Program (CERP). The provision 

would limit the amount of funds available for the program to 

$60.0 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1211) that would extend the CERP authority for 

one year and would require a report on lessons learned and best 

practices from the execution of CERP in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration

activities in Afghanistan (sec. 1212)
203

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1212) that would 

amend section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383), as 

amended, to extend the authority to use Department of Defense 

funds to support reintegration activities in Afghanistan and 

authorize the use of up to $25.0 million for these purposes. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1213).

The agreement includes this provision.

Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition 

nations for support provided to United States military 

operations (sec. 1213)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1211) that would 

extend for fiscal year 2014 and modify the authority under 

section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181), as amended, to provide 

reimbursements to certain nations for support provided to U.S. 

military operations in Operation Enduring Freedom. The 

provision would limit funds available under this authority 

(“Coalition Support Funds”) for fiscal year 2014 to $1.5 

billion. The provision would also require that, prior to making 

reimbursements to Pakistan, the Secretary of Defense must make 

certain certifications to the congressional defense committees, 

or invoke a national security waiver. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1215) that would extend the authority under 

section 1233 of Public Law 110-181, as amended, for fiscal year 

2014. The provision would also extend through fiscal year 2014 

the notification requirements, under section 1232(b)(6) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 

Stat. 393) as amended, relating to Coalition Support Funds 

reimbursements for Pakistan for support provided by Pakistan. 

The provision would further extend the limitations, under 

section 1227(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2000), on 

reimbursements of Pakistan pending certain certifications 

regarding Pakistan. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical amendment.

Extension and modification of authority to support operations 

and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq 

(sec. 1214)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1214) that would 
204

extend for fiscal year 2014 the authority under section 1215 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

(Public Law 112-81), as amended by section 1211 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-

329), for the Secretary of Defense to use up to $209.0 million 

in funds to support the operations and activities of the Office 

of Security Cooperation in Iraq (OSC-I). The provision would 

also authorize the OSC-I during fiscal year 2014 to conduct nonoperational training of Iraqi Ministry of Defense (MOD) 

personnel in an institutional environment to build certain 

capabilities of the Iraqi security forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1212) that would extend for fiscal year 2014 the 

authority to fund the OSC-I under section 1215 of Public Law 

112-81, as amended. The provision would also authorize the OSCI during fiscal year 2014 to conduct non-operational, 

institution-based training of Iraqi MOD and Counter Terrorism 

Service personnel. Such training would be required to include 

elements that promote the observance of and respect for human 

rights and fundamental freedoms, military professionalism, and 

respect for legitimate civilian authority within Iraq. 

The agreement includes the provision in the Senate 

committee-reported bill. 

An issue of concern is the safety and security of the 

residents of Camp Liberty (Hurriya), Iraq, and impediments to 

their resettlement in other countries. We direct the Secretary 

of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the 

Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Attorney General, to 

submit a report on the current security situation at Camp 

Liberty and efforts to relocate the camp residents to other 

countries. The report should include:

(1) A description of the current security situation at 

Camp Liberty, the disposition of security resources such as 

T-walls and sandbags, and decisions by camp residents on 

how to use those resources; 

(2) A description of the status review and 

resettlement process conducted by the United Nations High 

Commissioner on Refugees (UNHCR), a discussion of the 

degree of cooperation by camp residents with that process, 

and an estimate of when that process is expected to be 

completed;

(3) An estimate as of the date of the report on the 

number of residents still at Camp Liberty, the number of 

residents that have received refugee status, the number of 

residents that have been relocated (including to which 

countries), and the countries that have indicated a 

willingness to receive resettled residents; and 
205

(4) A discussion of the steps that would need to be 

taken by recipient countries, the UNHCR, and the camp 

residents to relocate the residents to other countries. 

The report should be provided not later than 120 days after 

the date of enactment of this Act to the Committees on Foreign 

Relations, Armed Services, Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs and Judiciary of the Senate and the Committees on 

Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, Homeland Security, and 

Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

One-year extension and modification of authority for program to 

develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan 

(sec. 1215)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1215) that would 

extend the authority under section 1217 of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111-383), as amended, for the program to build large-scale 

infrastructure projects funded by the Afghanistan Infrastructure 

Fund (AIF). The provision would limit the amount available for 

the AIF in fiscal year 2014 to $279.0 million. The provision 

would also amend the reporting elements of the plan that must be 

submitted to the appropriate congressional committees prior to 

the use of AIF funds in any given fiscal year. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1214) that would extend the authority under section 1217 

of Public Law 111-383 and limit AIF funding during fiscal year 

2014 to $250.0 million. It would also require a report on the 

plan for transitioning to the Government of Afghanistan, or a 

utility owned by the Government of Afghanistan, the project 

management of any projects funded with fiscal year 2014 AIF 

funds. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with technical 

and clarifying amendments. We believe that with the drawdown of 

U.S. troops in Afghanistan and the approaching conclusion of the 

International Security Assistance Force mission at the end of 

December 2014, the justification for the Department of Defense 

funding large-scale infrastructure projects in Afghanistan is 

increasingly attenuated. We expect that the Department of 

Defense will cease AIF funding for any new large-scale 

infrastructure projects after fiscal year 2014.

Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to 

Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes 

assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed 

by Afghanistan (sec. 1216)
206

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1217) that would 

require the withholding of Department of Defense (DOD) 

assistance for Afghanistan during fiscal year 2014 in an amount 

equal to the total of all taxes assessed during fiscal year 2013 

by the Government of Afghanistan on assistance provided by DOD. 

The Secretary of Defense would be able to waive this requirement 

if the Secretary determines that doing so is necessary to 

achieve U.S. goals in Afghanistan. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would provide that the requirements of this 

section terminate on the date when the Secretary of Defense 

notifies the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

House of Representatives that a bilateral security agreement 

between the United States and Afghanistan has entered into 

force.

Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign forces 

supporting or participating with the United States Armed Forces 

(sec. 1217)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1216) that would extend through fiscal year 2014 the 

authority under section 1234 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181), as 

amended, to provide logistical support to coalition partners in 

Afghanistan. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would extend 

through December 31, 2014, two authorities for supporting 

foreign forces participating in coalition operations with U.S. 

armed forces. First, the provision would extend the authority 

under section 1234 of Public Law 110-181 to provide logistical 

support to coalition partners in Afghanistan. Second, the 

provision would extend the authority under section 1202 of the 

John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2007 (Public Law 109-364), as amended, to use acquisition and 

cross-servicing agreements to loan personnel protection 

equipment to partner nations in coalition operations and in 

connection with training for deployment to such operations. The 

Department has requested the extension of both of these 

authorities in connection with coalition operations in 

Afghanistan.

Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa 

program (sec. 1218)
207

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1218) that would 

make certain improvements to the Iraq Special Immigrant Visa 

program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1217).

The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported bill 

provision with a technical/clarifying amendment.

Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program (sec. 

1219)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1219) that would 

make improvements to Afghan Special Immigrant Visa program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1218).

The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported bill 

provision with a technical/clarifying amendment.

Subtitle C—Matters Relating to Afghanistan 

Post 2014

Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network 

activities and finances (sec. 1221) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1221) that would 

modify the report required under section 1230 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-

181), as amended, to require additional reporting semi-annually 

on: The redeployment of U.S. armed forces from Afghanistan; the 

transfer of Department of Defense tasks and functions to other 

entities as part of the transition; and the long-term capability 

of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to sustain 

infrastructure projects constructed for the ANSF. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

President to submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a 

report on U.S. Government activities and plans to disrupt and 

degrade Haqqani Network activities and finances. The provision 

sets out specific elements of the report, which would be 

required to be submitted not later than 9 months after the date 

of enactment of this Act.

Completion of accelerated transition of security responsibility 

from United States Armed Forces to the Afghan National Security 
208

Forces (sec. 1222)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1222) that would 

set out the policy of the United States and a sense of Congress 

relating to the security transition and the post-2014 U.S. 

military presence in Afghanistan. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment. 

We expect the Department of Defense to note the cost of any 

post-2014 presence in its budget request so that Congress can 

appropriately consider the presence and maintain oversight of 

U.S. efforts in Afghanistan.

Defense Intelligence Plan (sec. 1223)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1223) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional 

defense and intelligence committees a plan regarding defense 

intelligence assets in relation to the drawdown of U.S. forces 

in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. The provision would 

require the plan to include a description of the defense 

intelligence assets; a description of any such assets that are 

slated to remain in Afghanistan after December 31, 2014; a 

description of any such assets that will be, or have been, 

reallocated to other locations outside of the United States; the 

defense intelligence priorities that will be, or have been, 

addressed with the reallocation of such assets; the necessary 

logistics, and operation and maintenance plans, to operate in 

the locations where such assets will be, or have been, 

reallocated, including personnel, basing, and any host country 

agreements; and a description of any such assets that will be, 

or have been, returned to the United States.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for 

Afghanistan (sec. 1224)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1224) that would 

restrict the availability of funds for certain authorities in 

Afghanistan until 15 days after the Secretary of Defense 

certifies that the United States and the Islamic Republic of 

Afghanistan have concluded a Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) 

that meets certain specified criteria. 
209

The Senate committee-reported bill contains no similar 

provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would limit the availability of funds for certain 

authorities in Afghanistan to no more than 50 percent of the 

amount authorized to be appropriated until 15 days after the 

Secretary of Defense certifies that a BSA has been signed that 

is in the national security interest of the United States. The 

Secretary of Defense would be authorized to waive the 

requirements of this provision if the Secretary determines that 

doing so is in the U.S. national security interest. If the 

waiver is invoked, the Secretary of Defense is directed to brief 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives on the basis for the determination.

We believe that such a BSA should ensure that: 

(1) the Department of Defense, its military and 

civilian personnel, and its contractors are protected from 

liability to pay taxes or other similar charges associated 

with efforts to carry out missions in Afghanistan that have 

been mutually agreed to between the U.S. Government and the 

Afghan Government;

(2) the United States has exclusive legal jurisdiction 

over U.S. Armed Forces deployed in Afghanistan; 

(3) the right of self-defense of the U.S. military 

mission and of U.S. military personnel is not infringed;

(4) the U.S. military in Afghanistan is able to take 

the necessary measures to protect other U.S. Government 

offices and personnel in Afghanistan; and 

(5) the U.S. military has sufficient access to bases 

and freedom of movement to carry out such missions and 

activities as the President assigns the military in 

Afghanistan, including the continuing effort to counter al 

Qaeda and its associated forces.

Subtitle D—Matters Relating to Iran

Report on United States military partnership with Gulf 

Cooperation Council countries (sec. 1231)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1231) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the 

congressional defense committees, within 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, on the United States military 

partnership with the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
210

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

technical/clarifying amendment.

Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran 

(sec. 1232)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1232) that would 

amend section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84) by requiring the Secretary 

of Defense to provide information on the global Iranian threat 

network and how the Iranian threat network reinforces the grand 

strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Additionally, this 

section would require the Secretary of Defense to provide a list 

of gaps in intelligence and to prioritize those gaps by 

operational need. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the report to include a section on 

Iran’s global network of terrorist and criminal groups and the 

associated capabilities of those entities.

We urge the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to 

describe the Department of Defense’s gaps in intelligence 

associated with Iran’s global network of terrorist and criminal 

groups when the Chairman prepares the report required under 

section 1231 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239).

Integrated air and missile defense programs at training 

locations in Southwest Asia (sec. 1233)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1234) that would 

amend Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

(22 U.S.C. 2347c(c)(1)) to allow for multilateral missile 

defense exercises.

The Senate committee-reported bill included no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters

Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional 

assisted recovery capabilities (sec. 1241)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1202) that would 

extend the authority of the Department of Defense to establish, 

develop, and maintain non-conventional assisted recovery (NAR) 
211

capabilities for 3 additional years.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1231) that would extend the authority of the 

Department of Defense to establish, develop, and maintain nonconventional assisted recovery capabilities for 2 additional 

years.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

We remain concerned about the lack of clarity in the 

reporting of NAR activities to include planning, prioritization, 

and execution and have included a statement on their concerns in 

the classified annex accompanying this report.

Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on 

military and security developments involving the People’s 

Republic of China (sec. 1242)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1232) that would add a requirement for the Department of 

Defense to include information on China’s 5th generation fighter 

programs in the congressionally-mandated Annual Report on 

Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s 

Republic of China.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes this provision. 

To improve insight into the dynamics of the relationship 

and interactions between the United States and the People’s 

Republic of China and their impact on security, we direct the 

Chairman of the United States-China Economic and Security Review 

Commission, not later than March 15, 2014, to submit a report on 

the mandate and purpose of the Commission to the appropriate 

congressional committees.

The report shall include: (1) A summary and description of 

the changes that have occurred in the relationship between the 

United States and China since December 31, 2000, with respect to 

those national security and economic issues that would impact 

the mandate of the Commission; and (2) Recommendations of the 

Commission for statutory changes to update the mandate and 

purpose of the Commission, taking into the account changes in 

the relationship between the United States and China.

The appropriate congressional committees include (1) the 

Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, 

the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Finance of 

the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, 

and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of 

Representatives.
212

Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to respond 

to an attack or other contingency against United States 

diplomatic facilities overseas (sec. 1243)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1241) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 

Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, to submit a report, not later 

than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, to 

the Senate Committee on Armed Services, the House Committee on 

Armed Services, the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, and 

the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, that assesses the 

terrorist groups that threaten the United States in Africa and a 

description of the readiness, posture, and alert status of 

relevant U.S. Armed Forces in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, 

and the United States; and any changes implemented since the 

terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would make modifications to the required contents 

of the report.

Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations 

Forces Coordination Centers (sec. 1244)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1245) that would 

prohibit the expenditure of funds for the establishment of 

Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers (RSCC) 

or similar regional entities and require a joint report by the 

Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to be submitted 

to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on 

Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs of the House of Representatives.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 342) that would prohibit the expenditure of any 

funds for the RSCCs in fiscal year 2014 and direct the Assistant 

Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity 

Conflict, in coordination with the Commander of U.S. Special 

Operations Command, not later than September 30, 2013, to submit 

a report to the congressional defense committees outlining, at a 

minimum: (1) the requirement and justification for the 

establishment of RSCCs; (2) the number and locations of planned 

RSCCs; (3) the projected cost to establish and maintain the 

proposed RSCCs in future years; (4) the relevance to and 

coordination with other multilateral engagement activities and 

academic institutes supported by the geographic combatant 

commanders and State Department; and (5) any legislative 
213

authorities that may be needed to establish RSCCs.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Additional reports on military and security developments 

involving the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (sec. 1245)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1246) that would 

amend the report on Military and Security Developments Involving 

the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), as originally 

required by section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81), to require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit the report every 2 years 

beginning on November 1, 2013, through November 1, 2017. The 

section would also require the Secretary of Defense to submit an 

update to the report if, in the Secretary of Defense’s 

estimation, interim events or developments occurring during the 

2-year period between reports requires an update. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

We note that the only change to section 1236 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is that 

the report will be submitted every 2 years instead of every 

year, and interim reports may be submitted, as needed.

We direct the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with 

the Secretary of State, to provide a classified briefing to the 

appropriate congressional committees, not later than 270 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, on the following issues 

related to the DPRK:

(1) A description of the governmental and economic 

activities, including bilateral trade, economic 

development, and financial investment, between the People’s 

Republic of China and the DPRK.

(2) A description of the entities and individuals of 

the People’s Republic of China engaged in the activities 

described under subparagraph (1).

(3) An assessment of the impact of the activities 

described under subparagraph (1) on the weapons of mass 

destruction program and ballistic missile program of the 

DPRK.

The appropriate congressional committees are (1) the 

Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Finance, and the 

Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the 

Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, 

and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of 

Representatives.
214

Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the 

Russian Federation and limitations on providing certain missile 

defense information to the Russian Federation (sec. 1246)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1248) that would 

limit funds to provide the Russian Federation with access to 

certain missile defense information.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 233) that would express the sense of Congress 

concerning missile defense cooperation with Russia and would 

also limit funds to provide the Russian Federation access to 

certain missile defense information.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would express the sense of Congress concerning 

missile defense cooperation with the Russian Federation and 

would establish several limitations on providing the Russian 

Federation with access to certain missile defense information.

Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament 

Act (sec. 1247)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1247) that would 

modify section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act 

(Title 22, United States Code, section 2593a) to define the 

appropriate congressional committees to which the annual report 

required under section 2593a would be provided. Those 

committees are: the Committee on Foreign Relations, the 

Committee on Armed Services, and the Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Permanent 

Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 

Representatives. The provision would also require a briefing to 

the appropriate congressional committees each spring on the most 

recent version of the report.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment.

Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile 

proliferation (sec. 1248)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1249) that would 

require reports on efforts to gain the cooperation of Russia and 

China to reduce the spread of technology and expertise that 

supports the ballistic missile programs of Iran, North Korea, 
215

Syria, and other nations.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit a report on steps that have been 

taken, and that are planned to be taken, to reduce the spread of 

technology and expertise that could support the ballistic 

missile development programs of Iran, North Korea, Syria, and 

other nations.

We expect the appropriate elements of the Intelligence 

Community to brief the appropriate committees of Congress on the 

ballistic missile development programs of Iran, North Korea, and 

Syria, as well as other nations of proliferation concern, and 

the spread of technology and expertise that supports those 

programs.

Reports on international agreements relating to the Department 

of Defense (sec. 1249)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1250) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 

Secretary of State, to notify the congressional defense 

committees, and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the 

Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, not later than 15 days 

after the date on which a Status of Forces Agreement between the 

United States and a foreign nation is signed, renewed, amended, 

otherwise revised, or terminated. This section would apply to 

such agreements that are signed on or after the date of the 

enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit 

semi-annually a report on certain agreements pertaining to 

matters primarily or significantly related to or involving the 

Department of Defense. The amendment would also terminate the 

requirement established in this provision on December 31, 2019.

We note that nothing in this section shall be construed to 

supersede section 112b of title 1 United States Code (commonly 

known as the “Case-Zablocki Act”).

Revision of statutory references to former NATO support 

organizations and related NATO agreements (sec. 1250)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1252) that would 

revise certain references in titles 10 and 22, United States 

Code, to reflect recent changes to the North Atlantic Treaty 
216

Organization organizational structure. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1234).

The agreement includes this provision.

Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating to 

ballistic missile defense (sec. 1251)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1253) that would 

limit funds to implement executive agreements relating to the 

ballistic missile defense capabilities of the United States, 

unless certain conditions are met.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would express the 

sense of Congress that any executive agreement between the 

United States and the Russian Federation relating to ballistic 

missile defense should not limit the development or deployment 

of missile defense systems or capabilities of the United States 

or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It would also 

require the President, or the President’s designee, to brief the 

appropriate committees of Congress prior to signing an executive 

agreement with Russia relating to ballistic missile defense.

Rule of construction (sec. 1252)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1258) that would 

set forth that nothing in this Act shall be construed as 

authorizing the use of force against the Syrian Arab Republic or 

the Islamic Republic of Iran.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

We note that this provision shall not be construed to 

infringe on the President’s constitutional authorities to 

preserve, protect, and defend the Nation.

Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade 

Treaty (sec. 1253)

The House bill contained a provision (sec.1262) that would 

limit the availability of funds available to the Department of 

Defense for the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would add a clause stating that nothing in this 
217

provision would preclude the Department of Defense from 

assisting foreign countries in bringing their laws and 

regulations up to U.S. standards. Should the Secretary of 

Defense determine such activities are required and appropriate, 

we encourage the Secretary to coordinate, to the maximum extent 

practicable, on such activities with the Secretary of State.

Report on military and security developments involving the 

Russian Federation (sec. 1254)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1268) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, not later than June 1, 2014, 

and annually thereafter through 2017, to submit to the specified 

congressional committees a report on the current and future 

military power of the Russian Federation. The report would 

address the current and probable future course of militarytechnological development of the Russian military, the tenets 

and probable development of Russian security and military 

strategy, and military organizations and operational concepts, 

for the 20-year period following the report.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an

amendment that would require a one-time report by the Secretary 

of Defense to the specified congressional committees on the 

security and military strategy of the Russian Federation. The 

amendment would require that the report include certain 

specified matters. 

Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or 

agreements with Rosoboronexport (sec. 1255)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1274) that would 

prohibit the use of funds authorized to be appropriated for the 

Department of Defense after fiscal year 2013 for the purchase of 

any equipment from the Russian state corporation, 

Rosoboronexport, until the Secretary of Defense makes certain 

specified certifications to the congressional defense 

committees. The Secretary of Defense would be authorized to 

waive this restriction if the Secretary certifies that doing so 

is in the national security interests of the United States. If 

the waiver is invoked, the Secretary is required to submit a 

report to Congress not later than 30 days before purchasing 

equipment from Rosoboronexport. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1233). 
218

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would clarify that nothing in the Act would 

prohibit the supply of spare parts for the sustained maintenance 

of helicopters operated by the Afghan National Security Forces.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian, disaster, 

and civic aid programs of the Department of Defense

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1207) that would 

permit that up to 5 percent of funds authorized to be 

appropriated by this Act to carry out sections 401, 402, 404, 

407, 2557, and 2561 of title 10, United States Code, may be made 

available to conduct monitoring and evaluation of programs 

conducted pursuant to such authorities during fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We understand the Department of Defense is in the process 

of developing metrics and incorporating them into existing 

program management tools to better monitor and evaluate overseas 

humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid programs of the 

Department. However, according to the Department, such efforts 

are not expected to be fully implemented for at least 1 to 2 

years. 

We, therefore, direct the Under Secretary of Defense for 

Policy to provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House Representatives on the status of the 

Department’s implementation efforts no later than 180 days after 

enactment of this Act. The briefing shall include, but not be 

limited to, a status update on metrics development and 

implementation, a description of how the Department plans to 

evaluate program and project outcomes and impact, including cost 

effectiveness and the extent to which programs meet designated 

goals, and an analysis of steps taken to implement the 

recommendations from the following reports: (1) The Government 

Accountability Office's Report titled “Project Evaluations and 

Better Information Sharing Needed to Manage the Military's 

Efforts”; (2) The Department of Defense Inspector General Report 

numbered “DODIG-2012-119”; and (3) The RAND Corporation's Report 

prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense titled 

“Developing a Prototype Handbook for Monitoring and Evaluating 

Department of Defense Humanitarian Assistance Projects.”

Special Immigrant Visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan allies
219

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1216) that would 

make certain amendments to section 602(b) of Afghan Allies 

Protection Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-8) and section 1244 of 

the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-181). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision.

Sense of Congress on commencement of new long-term nation 

building or large-scale infrastructure development projects in 

Afghanistan

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1219) that would express the sense of Congress that the 

Department of Defense should seek not to commence any new longterm nation building or large-scale infrastructure development 

project in Afghanistan after 2014. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. We expect 

that, with the conclusion of the International Security 

Assistance Force mission at the end of 2014, the Department of 

Defense should no longer seek to begin new large-scale 

infrastructure development projects in Afghanistan.

Sense of Congress 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1220) expressing 

the Sense of the House of Representatives that the Special 

Immigration Visa programs for Iraqis and Afghans are critical to 

the U.S. national security, and that these programs must be 

reformed and extended in order to meet the congressional intent 

with which they were created.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Limitation on funds to establish permanent military 

installations or bases in Afghanistan

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1225) that would 

prohibit the use of funds to establish any military installation 

or base for the permanent stationing of U.S. armed forces in 

Afghanistan. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision.
220

Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1233) that would 

express the sense of Congress with respect to the importance of 

the defense of the Arabian Gulf. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We believe that the United States should continue to 

maintain the appropriate posture to defend the Arabian Gulf.

Statement of policy on condemning the Government of Iran for its 

state-sponsored persecution of its Baha’i minority

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1235) that would 

condemn the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for its 

persecution of its Baha'i minority in Iran.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that both the U.S. House of Representatives and the 

U.S. Senate have passed similar resolutions condemning the 

actions of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran as it 

relates to the Baha’i minority.

Technical correction relating to funding for NATO Special 

Operations Headquarters 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1235) that would make technical modifications to section 

1244 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2010 (Public Law 111-84), as amended, that would authorize the 

Secretary of Defense to use up to $50.0 million from Operation 

and Maintenance in any fiscal year to support the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization Special Operations Headquarters.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Role of the Government of Egypt to United States national 

security 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1242) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 

Secretary of State, to submit a report that contains a plan for 

United States military assistance and cooperation with Egypt.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
221

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note the continuing national security interests of the 

United States in ensuring that the Government of Egypt enhances 

its ability to detect, disrupt, dismantle, and defeat terrorist 

organizations and that Egypt remains a stable, strategic partner 

in the region. We urge the Secretary of Defense to ensure that 

any plan to modernize and improve U.S. security cooperation with 

and assistance to Egypt addresses these matters.

Sense of Congress on the military developments on the Korean 

peninsula

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1243) that would 

express certain findings and the sense of Congress regarding the 

military developments on the Korean peninsula. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

Statement of Congress on defense cooperation with Georgia

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1244) that would 

express findings and a statement of Congress with respect to the 

Republic of Georgia. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1251) that would 

express the sense of Congress with respect to the situation in 

Syria.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Limitation on availability of funds for Threat Reduction 

Engagement activities and United States contributions to the 

Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1254) that would 

provide that none of the funds made available for fiscal year 

2014 for Threat Reduction Engagement activities may be obligated 

or expended until the President certifies to Congress that no 

state party to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) 

has undertaken nuclear weapons test activities in fiscal year 
222

2013 that are inconsistent with U.S. interpretations

regarding obligations under such Treaty.

This section would also provide that none of the funds made

available for fiscal year 2014 for contributions to the 

Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization may be used for 

lobbying or advocacy in the United States relating to the CTBT.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that regarding lobbying and advocacy activities in 

the United States by the Comprehensive Ban Treaty Organization 

(18 U.S.C. 1913) prohibits such activities.

Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation between 

the United States and Burma

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1255) that would 

express the sense of Congress regarding military-to-military 

cooperation between the United States and the Union of Burma. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision. 

We have a pronounced interest in the status of military-tomilitary relations between the United States and the Union of 

Burma and support efforts to enhance military professionalism, 

accountability, and civilian controls. We recognize that high 

standards of military professionalism, strict accountability, 

and effective civilian controls reduce the risks of abuse 

committed by military forces and encourage the Secretary of 

Defense to keep the congressional defense committees informed of 

military-to-military engagements between the United States and 

the Union of Burma.

Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States forces in 

Europe

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1256) that would 

express certain findings and the sense of Congress with respect 

to the stationing of U.S. armed forces in Europe. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that an enduring U.S. presence and engagement with 

allies and other partners across Europe and Eurasia provides 

critical access and infrastructure necessary to accomplish U.S. 

strategic priorities and to facilitate a rapid U.S. response for 

complex contingencies in Europe, Eurasia, the Middle East, 
223

Africa as well as the Mediterranean and Atlantic Ocean. We 

further note that the United States continues to have an 

interest in supporting the stability and security of Europe. 

Accordingly, we direct the Secretary of Defense, not later 

than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, to provide 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives a report on: 

(1) The plans, if any, of the Department of Defense to 

maintain and enhance the capabilities of the forwardstationed active duty service members, forward-deployed 

rotational units, and reserve forces assigned to U.S. 

European Command to fulfill U.S. commitments under Article 

V of the North Atlantic Charter and other missions vital to 

protecting U.S. national security interests;

(2) The plans, if any, of the Department of Defense to 

maintain and enhance the capabilities of such forces to 

provide logistical and operational support to U.S. Central 

Command, U.S. Africa Command, and U.S. Strategic Command; 

and

(3) The steps, if any, that the Department of Defense 

has taken to implement the recommendations of the 

Government Accountability Office with regard to improved 

cost estimation to support informed force posture decisions 

with regard to the stationing of U.S. armed forces in 

Europe.

Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the People’s 

Republic of China

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1257) that would 

express certain findings and the sense of Congress regarding the 

military developments of the People’s Republic of China.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

We reaffirm our interest in the Asia-Pacific region and the 

implementation of the rebalance to that region, as described in 

the Defense Strategic Guidance, dated January 2012. We 

encourage the Secretary of Defense to continue engaging with the 

congressional defense committees to facilitate the successful 

implementation of the strategic rebalance and to continue to 

support the national security interests of the United States and 

its allies and partners in the Asia-Pacific region.

Sense of Congress regarding relations with Taiwan

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1259) that would 
224

express the sense of Congress regarding the diplomatic 

allowances granted to high-level Taiwanese officials and 

commercial interests.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

Sense of Congress on the threat posed by Hezbollah 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1260) that would 

express the sense of Congress with respect to the threat posed 

by Hezbollah. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Combating crime through intelligence capabilities

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1261) that would 

authorize the supply of intelligence resources to the Joint 

Interagency Task Force South (JIATF-S) in coordination with U.S. 

Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) to combat crime.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note sequestration and budget restrictions are having a 

negative impact not only on readiness and modernization 

accounts, but also on the ability of the Department of Defense 

(DOD) to carry out ongoing missions. 

Budgetary restrictions have drastically reduced the ability 

of DOD and partner agencies to allocate assets--particularly as 

it pertains to intelligence capabilities to the JIATF-S mission 

of countering illicit drug trafficking and disruption of 

transnational criminal organizations in the SOUTHCOM area of 

responsibility. 

We believe that the across-the-board sequestration cuts to 

the DOD budget are arbitrary and undermine the national security 

of the United States. We encourage the Secretary of Defense to 

do as much as practicable to continue key operations of the 

geographic combatant commands, such as the counternarcotics 

missions of SOUTHCOM and JIATF-S.

War Powers of Congress

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1263) that would 

set forth that nothing in this Act shall be construed to 

authorize any use of military force.
225

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Prohibition on use of drones to kill United States citizens 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1264) that would 

prohibit the Department of Defense from using drones to kill 

U.S. citizens.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sale of F-16 fighter aircraft to Taiwan

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1265) that would 

require the sale of no fewer than 66 F-16C/D multirole fighter 

aircraft to Taiwan.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision. 

We recognize that the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96-

8) states that “the United States will make available to Taiwan 

such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as 

may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient selfdefense capability” and that “the President and the Congress 

shall determine the nature and quantity of such defense articles 

based solely upon their judgment on the needs of Taiwan, in 

accordance with procedures established by law.” We believe the 

President should continue to take steps, consistent with the 

Taiwan Relations Act, to enable the Taiwan air forces to

contribute to a sufficient self-defense capability.

Statement of policy and report on the inherent right of Israel 

to self-defense 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1266) that would 

make a statement of policy and require a report on the inherent 

right of Israel to self-defense.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We reaffirm the U.S. commitment to the security of the 

State of Israel to help the Government of Israel preserve its 

qualitative military edge.

Report on collective and national security implications of 
226

Central Asian and South Caucasus energy development 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1267) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 

Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, to submit to the 

appropriate congressional committees a detailed report on the 

implications of new energy resource development and distribution 

networks, in the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea, for energy 

security strategies of the United States and the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization (NATO). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives, not later than 90 days after enactment of the 

Act, on regional security in the Caucasus region and its 

implications for the security interests of the United States and 

NATO.

Limitation on assistance to provide tear gas or other riot 

control items 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1269) that would 

prohibit funds authorized or appropriated by the House bill from 

being used to provide tear gas or other riot control items to 

the government of a country undergoing a transition to democracy 

in the Middle East or North Africa without certification from 

the Secretary of Defense.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Report on certain financial assistance to Afghan military

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1270) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress on 

measures to monitor and ensure that U.S. financial assistance to 

the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) is not being used to 

purchase fuel from Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We direct 

the Secretary of Defense to provide the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a 

briefing, within 90 days of the enactment of this Act, on the 

Department’s measures to monitor and ensure that U.S. financial 
227

assistance to the ANSF is not being used to purchase Iranian 

fuel in violation of U.S. sanctions.

Israel’s right to self-defense

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1271) that would 

express the support of Congress for Israel’s lawful exercise of 

self-defense including actions to halt regional aggression. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress strongly supporting the full implementation of 

United States and international sanctions on Iran and urging the 

President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions 

legislation 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1272) that would 

express Congress’ support for full implementation of U.S. and 

international sanctions against Iran and would urge the 

President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions 

legislation. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Sense of Congress on the illegal nuclear weapons programs of 

Iran and North Korea

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1273) that would 

express the sense of Congress regarding the threat posed by 

nuclear proliferation in North Korea and Iran.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

TITLE XIII–COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds 

(sec. 1301)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1301) that 

would define the programs and funds that are Cooperative Threat 

Reduction (CTR) programs and funds as those authorized to be 

appropriated in section 301 of this Act and specify that CTR 

funds shall remain available for obligation for 3 fiscal years.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 
228

provision (sec. 1301). 

The agreement includes this provision.

Funding allocations (sec. 1302)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1302) that 

would allocate specific amounts for each program element under 

the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) 

Program from within the overall $528.5 million that the 

committee would authorize for the CTR program. This section 

would also require notification to Congress 15 days before the 

Secretary of Defense obligates and expends fiscal year 2014 

funds for purposes other than those specifically authorized. In 

addition, this section would provide limited authority to 

obligate amounts for a program element under the CTR program in 

excess of the amount specifically authorized for that purpose.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1302).

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that provides that for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 the 

Department may exceed the 10-percent limitation of section 5965 

of title 22, United States Code for activities with respect to 

Syria. This enhanced authority is an extraordinary measure that 

is without precedent in the CTR program, and we will exercise 

congressional oversight to ensure the enhanced authority is 

properly and effectively used. We expect the Department to 

balance the need for destroying the Syrian chemical weapons 

stockpile, an urgent national security threat, with the 

expediency of using the CTR funds to assist in this effort. 

Given the fluid and urgent nature of this endeavor, the 

amendment contains enhanced briefing requirements rather than 

detailed reports. We expect these briefings to provide the 

appropriate congressional committees with the necessary detailed 

information to ensure an accounting of the funding provided 

under the program while achieving the ultimate goal of 

destroying Syria’s chemical stockpile. We expect the Department 

to provide, without delay, thorough answers to questions that 

might arise during these briefings to ensure adequate oversight 

in the use of this enhanced authority.

Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to the 

cooperative threat reduction program (sec. 1303)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1303) that 

would extend the authority of the Cooperative Threat Reduction 

(CTR) program to accept monetary contributions from partner 

nations, as set forth in the National Defense Authorization Act 
229

for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84), from December 31, 

2015, to December 31, 2018.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1303).

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Strategy to modernize Cooperative Threat Reduction and prevent 

the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related 

materials in the Middle East and North Africa region (sec. 1304)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1304) that would 

direct the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the 

Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, to prepare a 

strategy and implementation plan for preventing the 

proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related 

materials in the Middle East and North Africa not later than 

March 31, 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1236) requiring the President to prepare such 

report and strategy.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would make technical changes. 

TITLE XIV-OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A-Military Programs

Working capital funds (sec. 1401)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1401) 

authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of 

the armed forces and agencies of the Department of Defense for 

working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding 

table in section 4501.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1401).

The agreement includes this provision. 

National Defense Sealift Fund (sec. 1402)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1402) 

authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the National 

Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the funding table in 

section 4501.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1402).
230

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense (sec. 1403)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1403) 

authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the 

Department of Defense for chemical agents and munitions 

destruction, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1403).

The agreement includes this provision. 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug activities, Defense-wide 

(sec. 1404)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1404) 

authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the 

Department of Defense for drug interdiction and counterdrug 

activities, defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in 

section 4501.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1404).

The agreement includes this provision. 

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1405)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1405) 

authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the 

Department of Defense for the Office of the Inspector General, 

as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1405).

The agreement includes this provision. 

Defense Health Program (sec. 1406)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1406) 

authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the Defense 

Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 

4501.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1406).

The agreement includes this provision.

Subtitle B-National Defense Stockpile

Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a 
231

strategic and critical materials supply (sec. 1411)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1411) that would 

modify certain provisions of the President’s authority to 

maintain and manage a national defense stockpile to allow the 

Defense Logistics Agency to more proactively engage in the 

market.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Authority to acquire additional materials for the National 

Defense Stockpile (sec. 1412)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1412) that would

provide authority to acquire certain additional strategic and 

critical materials for the National Defense Stockpile.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Subtitle C—Other Matters

Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of DefenseDepartment of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration 

Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois 

(sec. 1421)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1421) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to transfer $143.1 million 

from the Defense Health Program to the Joint Department of 

Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility 

Demonstration Fund created by section 1704 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-

84) for the operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal 

Health Care Center.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1422).

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical amendment. 

Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home 

(sec. 1422)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1422) that would 

authorize $67.8 million to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 
232

from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund for the 

operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1421). 

The agreement includes this provision.

Cemeterial expenses (sec. 1423)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1423) that would 

authorize $45.8 million to be appropriated for the Department of 

the Army for fiscal year 2014 for cemeterial expenses. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

TITLE XV–AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL 

APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 

OPERATIONS

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional 

Appropriations

Purpose (sec. 1501)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1501) stating 

the purpose of the title.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1501).

The agreement includes this provision.

Procurement (sec. 1502)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1502) 

authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for 

procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine 

Corps, the Air Force, and defense-wide activities, as specified 

in the funding table in section 4102.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1502).

The agreement includes this provision.

Research, development, test, and evaluation (sec. 1503)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1503) 

authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for 
233

the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and 

evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1503).

The agreement includes this provision.

Operation and maintenance (sec. 1504)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1504) 

authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for 

the use of the Armed Forces and other agencies of the Department 

of Defense for operation and maintenance, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4302.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1504).

The agreement includes this provision.

Military personnel (sec. 1505)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1505) 

authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for 

the use of the armed forces and other agencies of the Department 

of Defense for military personnel, as specified in the funding 

table in section 4402.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1505).

The agreement includes this provision.

Working capital funds (sec. 1506)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1506) 

authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for 

the use of the armed forces and other agencies of the Department 

of Defense for working capital and revolving funds, as specified 

in the funding table in section 4502.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1506).

The agreement includes this provision.

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide 

(sec. 1507)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1507) 

authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for 

the Department of Defense for drug interdiction and counterdrug 

activities, defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in 

section 4502.
234

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1509).

The agreement includes this provision.

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1508)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1508) 

authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for 

the Department of Defense for the Office of the Inspector 

General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4502.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1510).

The agreement includes this provision.

Defense Health Program (sec. 1509)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1509) 

authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for 

the use of the armed forces and other agencies of the Department 

of Defense for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4502.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1511).

The agreement includes this provision.

Subtitle B—Financial Matters

Treatment as additional authorizations (sec. 1521)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1521) stating 

that the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are 

in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 1521).

The agreement includes this provision.

Special transfer authority (sec. 1522)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1522) that would 

provide the Department of Defense with $3.0 billion of special 

transfer authority in fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1522) that would provide the Department of 

Defense with $4.0 billion of special transfer authority in 

fiscal year 2014.
235

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other 

Matters

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (sec. 1531)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1531) that would 

require that funds available to the Department of Defense for 

the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (ASFF) for fiscal year 2014 

be subject to the specified conditions contained in section 1513 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 

(Public Law 110-181), as amended. The provision would also 

require that an office or official be identified as responsible 

for each program or activity supported with ASFF. In addition, 

the provision would require that not less than $47.3 million of 

ASFF for fiscal year 2014 be used for the recruitment and 

retention of women in the Afghanistan National Security Forces 

(ANSF). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1532) that would require that ASFF for fiscal year 2014 be 

subject to the specified conditions contained in section 1513 of 

Public Law 110-181. The provision would also provide the 

Secretary of Defense certain authorities for the disposal of 

equipment in Afghanistan. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require that not less than $25.0 million of 

ASFF for fiscal year 2014 be available to be used for programs 

and activities to support the recruitment, integration, 

retention, training, and treatment of women in the ANSF. The 

amendment would also include certain authorities for the 

Secretary of Defense relating to the disposal of equipment in 

Afghanistan. In this regard, we direct the Secretary of Defense 

to submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 

the Department’s plans for the final disposition of the C-27A 

aircraft acquired to build the capabilities of the ANSF. The 

report should be submitted not later than 180 days after the 

enactment of this Act. 

A key objective of the ASFF is to build the capacity of the 

ANSF, specifically the Afghan Air Force and the Special Mission 

Wing, to operate, maintain, and sustain rotary wing aircraft. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense, not later than 180 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, to submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report assessing the 

potential to incorporate U.S.-manufactured rotary wing aircraft 

into the ANSF after the current program of record is completed. 
236

The report should include an estimate of the anticipated costs 

(including costs associated with procurement and sustainment), 

schedule, and a description of the training required for 

potentially incorporating U.S.-manufactured rotary wing aircraft 

into the ANSF. The report should also include a description of 

any other actions required to be undertaken to facilitate 

incorporating such aircraft into the ANSF.

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund (sec. 1532)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1531) that would authorize annual transfer authorities, 

current reporting requirements, and other associated activities 

for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical/clarifying amendment.

Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat 

Organization (sec. 1533)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1532) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to Congress 

on the future role of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device 

Defeat Organization.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

technical/clarifying amendment.

Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and Stability 

Operations in Afghanistan (sec. 1534)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1533) that would extend the authority under section 1535 

of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) for the Task Force for Business 

and Stability Operations in Afghanistan. The provision would 

limit funding available for the programs of the Task Force to 

$63.8 million during fiscal year 2014. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

National Defense Sealift Fund
237

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1507) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal 

year 2014 for the National Defense Sealift Fund as specified in 

the funding table in section 4502.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 1508) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal 

year 2014 for chemical agents and munitions destruction as 

specified in the funding table in section 4502.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 

support for Operation Observant Compass 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1533) that would 

require that none of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 

for operation and maintenance by section 1504, as specified in 

the funding table in section 4302 of this Act, may be obligated 

or expended for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 

support for Operation Observant Compass until the Secretary of 

Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a 

report, required elsewhere in this Act, on Operation Observant 

Compass.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Report on U.S. force levels and costs of military operations in 

Afghanistan

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1534) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to report to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on 

U.S. forces levels in Afghanistan and the estimated costs of 

U.S. military operations in Afghanistan for each of fiscal years 

2015 through 2020. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Limitation on funds for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund to 
238

acquire certain aircraft, vehicles, and equipment

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1535) that would 

limit the availability of $2.6 billion of the funds authorized 

to be appropriated for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund 

(ASFF) until the Secretary of Defense submits a report to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives on the aircraft, vehicles, and equipment to be 

purchased with ASFF authorized to be appropriated by this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We note 

that the Department of Defense has revised its requested funding 

for the ASFF, resulting in a reduction of $1.45 billion from the 

budget request.

TITLE XVI-INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS

Subtitle A—Defense Industrial Base Matters

Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General 

of Department of Defense (sec. 1601)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1601) that would 

require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to 

conduct an audit of the Department’s compliance with contracting 

practices and policies related to procurement under section 

2533a of title 10, United States Code, which pertains to the 

requirement to buy certain articles from American sources and is 

frequently referred to as the “Berry Amendment.” This section 

would also require the Inspector General to include the findings 

of such periodic audits as part of the semiannual report 

transmitted to congressional committees as required by the 

Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-452).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying 

amendment.

Foreign space activities (sec. 1602)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1605) that would 

prevent the Secretary of Defense from entering into contracts 

for commercial satellite services with a covered foreign entity 

in a covered foreign country. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 
239

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would add a determination standard (of reasonable 

belief) that the covered foreign entity has an ownership 

interest that enables that government to affect satellite 

operations. The notice and exception provision has also been 

adjusted to require a 7-day notice-and-wait to the congressional 

defense committee.

The amendment further contains a provision that prohibits 

the President from authorizing or permitting the construction of 

a global navigation satellite system ground monitoring station 

owned or operated on behalf of a foreign government on U.S. 

territory unless the Secretary of Defense and Director of 

National Intelligence certify that the ground station will not 

be capable of being used to gather intelligence in the United 

States or to improve a foreign weapons system. The amendment 

contains a national security waiver if certain conditions are 

met, and a report to accompany the waiver with a notice to the 

appropriate congressional committees 30 days before such waiver 

is used. The provision has a sunset period of 5 years following 

the date of enactment.

We do not intend this provision to affect general private 

or scientific cooperation with other parties.

Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program (sec. 1603)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1606) that would 

allow the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and 

Engineering to establish a 5-year pilot program to accelerate 

the commercialization of basic research innovations from 

qualifying institutions.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying 

amendment.

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Small 

Business Concerns

Advancing small business growth (sec. 1611)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1602) that would 

require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics to publish, and update annually, a 

list of capabilities and characteristics that would enable a 

qualified small business concern to become competitive as an 
240

other-than-small business for future contracts awarded by the 

Department of Defense. 

This section would also require any contract awarded to a 

qualified small business concern that would exceed the 

applicable receipt-based small business size standard (or if the 

contract would exceed $70.0 million in an industry with an 

employee based size standard) to include a contract clause that 

would encourage the small business to develop the capabilities 

and characteristics identified by the Under Secretary if they 

desire to remain competitive as other-than-small business in 

that industry. 

In addition, this section would amend chapter 142 of title 

10, United States Code, to enable Procurement Technical 

Assistance Centers (PTAC) to provide additional support to these 

businesses without the funding and cost-share limitations that 

are otherwise applicable to PTAC support. 

Finally, this section would require the Secretary of 

Defense to submit three annual reports to the congressional 

defense committees beginning on March 1, 2015, on the 

implementation of the amendments made by this section, along 

with any recommendations for improving the Procurement Technical 

Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying 

amendment.

Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance 

Cooperative Agreement Program (sec. 1612)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1603) that would 

amend section 2413 of title 10, United States Code, to allow the 

Secretary of Defense to defray up to 65 percent of the eligible 

entity’s cost of furnishing assistance under the program and 

would also amend section 2414 of title 10, United States Code, 

to increase limitations on the value of assistance that may be 

provided under the program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision. 

Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small 

business concerns (sec. 1613)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1607) that would 

amend section 644 of title 15, United States Code, to require 

each federal agency to submit a report detailing small business 
241

concerns. This report would include information regarding, 

among other concerns, veteran and service-disabled veteran-owned 

small businesses.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying 

amendment.

Credit for certain small business subcontractors (sec. 1614) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1609) that would 

amend section 637d of title 15, United States Code, redefining 

pertaining to subcontracting.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying 

amendment.

Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain 

contracts (sec. 1615)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1611) that would 

dismiss the requirements stated in section 802 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 pertaining to the 

provisions of section 46 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

657s). The purpose of this provision is to reduce the number of 

unnecessarily duplicative reports.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the provision.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks of meals 

ready-to-eat

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1604) that would 

require the Administrator of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) 

not to make any reductions in requirements for war reserve 

stocks of meals ready-to-eat (MRE) until a comprehensive 

strategy is developed and briefed to the congressional defense 

committees.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include the provision.

We note that the DLA has developed a comprehensive 

strategic plan that: ensures an adequate MRE inventory for each 
242

of the Services; maintains the appropriate levels of MRE war 

reserves; and provides for a surge capability to support 

unforeseen contingencies. We also acknowledge that the DLA has 

decided to hold current MRE stock levels steady through the end 

of combat operations in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan 

until the enduring requirement can be fully established.

Program to provide federal contracts to early stage small 

businesses 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1608) that would 

amend section 631 of title 15, United States Code, which would 

provide improved access to federal contract opportunities for 

early stage small business concerns.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

GAO study on subcontracting reporting systems 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1610) that would 

require the Comptroller General to submit a report to the 

Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and 

to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the 

Senate regarding the feasibility of using federal subcontracting 

reporting systems.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not contain the provision.

We direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

submit not later than 365 days after enactment of this Act a 

report studying the feasibility of using federal subcontracting 

reporting systems, including the federal subcontracting 

reporting system required by section 2 of the Federal Funding 

Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 and any electronic 

subcontracting reporting award system used by the Small Business 

Administration, to attribute subcontractors to any particular 

contracts in the case of contractors that have subcontracting 

plans under section 8(d) of the Small Business Act that pertain 

to multiple contracts with executive agencies.

TITLE XVII–SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND 

RESPONSE AND RELATED REFORMS
243

Subtitle A-Reform of Uniform Code of 

Military Justice

Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 1701)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 542) that would 

amend chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, to include in 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) specified rights for 

victims of offenses under the UCMJ.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 564) that would require the Secretary of Defense 

to recommend modifications to the Manual for Courts-Martial 

(MCM) to include in the MCM specified rights for victims of 

offenses under the UCMJ.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of Military 

Justice (sec. 1702)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 531) that would 

amend Article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 

(10 U.S.C. 860) to limit the authority of a court-martial 

convening authority to modify the findings and sentence imposed 

by a court-martial. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 555).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment and a provision that would amend Article 

32, UCMJ, (10 U.S.C. 832) to require the completion of a 

preliminary hearing, normally conducted by a judge advocate, 

prior to referral to general court-martial for trial of any 

charge or specification. 

The changes to Article 60, UCMJ, included in the agreement 

significantly restrict the ability of a convening authority to 

modify the adjudged findings and sentence of a court-martial, 

except in limited circumstances.

The provision included in the agreement changes Article 32, 

UCMJ, proceedings from an investigation to a preliminary 

hearing. Under current law and Rule 405 of the Rules for CourtMartial, an Article 32, UCMJ, investigation includes inquiry 

into the truth of the matters set forth in the charges, provides 

a means to ascertain and impartially weigh all available facts 

in arriving at conclusions and recommendations, and serves as a 

tool of discovery. The agreement establishes that an Article 
244

32, UCMJ, preliminary hearing has a narrower objective: (1) To 

determine whether there is probable cause to believe an offense 

has been committed and the accused committed the offense; (2) 

Determine whether the convening authority has court-martial 

jurisdiction over the offense and the accused; (3) Consider the 

form of the charges; and (4) Recommend the disposition that 

should be made of the case. 

The Secretary of Defense is directed to recommend changes 

to Rule 405 of the Rules for Court-Martial and other rules, if 

appropriate, in the Manual for Courts-Martial to facilitate the 

purposes of the Article 32, UCMJ, preliminary investigation, as 

revised by the agreement. Changes to the Manual for CourtsMartial shall be completed in time to coincide with the 

effective date of changes to Article 32, UCMJ, effectuated by 

this Act.

Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by 

court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-related 

crimes (sec. 1703)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 532) that would 

amend Article 43 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice 

(section 843 of title 10, United States Code) to eliminate the 

5-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for 

sexual assault and sexual assault of a child.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 551).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related 

offense in presence of trial counsel, counsel for the victim, or 

a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate (sec. 1704)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 543) that would 

amend Article 46 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 

U.S.C. 846) to require that, upon notice by trial counsel to 

defense counsel that trial counsel intends to call a complaining 

witness to testify at an investigation under Article 32, Uniform 

Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 842) or court-martial, the 

defense counsel shall make all requests to interview the 

complaining witness through the trial counsel, and, if requested 

by the complaining witness, the defense counsel interview shall 

take place only in the presence of the counsel for the 

complaining witness or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 553).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 
245

clarifying amendment that would require that, if requested by an 

alleged victim of an alleged sex-related offense who is subject 

to a request for interview by defense counsel, such interview 

shall take place only in the presence of trial counsel, a

counsel for the victim, or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate.

Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and 

trial of such offenses by general courts-martial (sec. 1705)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 533) that would 

amend article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 

U.S.C. 856) to require that the sentence for a person found 

guilty of specified sex-related offenses include, at a minimum, 

a dismissal or dishonorable discharge.

The House bill also contained a provision (sec. 550A) that 

would amend article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice 

(10 U.S.C. 856) to require that the sentence for a person found 

guilty of specified sex-related offenses include, at a minimum, 

a dismissal or dishonorable discharge and confinement for 2 

years.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 554) that would amend article 56 of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 856) to require that the sentence 

for a person found guilty of specified sex-related offenses 

include, at a minimum, a dismissal or dishonorable discharge, 

and would limit jurisdiction over these specified sex-related 

offenses to a general court-martial.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical amendment.

Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-martial 

process (sec. 1706)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 544) that would 

amend Article 60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 

U.S.C. 860(b)) to require that complaining witnesses be provided 

an opportunity to submit matters for consideration by the 

convening authority before the convening authority acts on the 

findings and sentence of a court-martial. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 556) that would amend Article 60(b) of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 860(b)) to: (1) Afford a complaining 

witness an opportunity to respond to any clemency matters 

submitted by an accused to the convening authority that refer to 

the complaining witness; (2) Afford a complaining witness an 

opportunity to submit matters to the convening authority in any 

case in which findings and sentence have been adjudged for an 
246

offense involving the complaining witness; and (3) Prohibit the 

convening authority from considering matters that go to the 

character of a complaining witness unless the matters were 

presented at the court-martial.

The agreement includes a provision that would amend Article 

60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 860(b)) 

to require that a victim be provided an opportunity to submit 

matters for consideration by the convening authority before the 

convening authority takes action on the findings or sentence of 

a court-martial that involved the victim, and to provide that 

the convening authority shall not consider any submitted matters 

that relate to the character of a victim unless such matters 

were presented as evidence at trial and not excluded at trial.

Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice (sec. 1707)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 562) that would amend Article 125 of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice (section 925 of title 10, United States Code) 

to prohibit forcible sodomy and bestiality.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor 

relating to character and military service of the accused in 

rule on initial disposition of offenses (sec. 1708)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 546) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to recommend to the President a 

change to the Manual for Courts-Martial that would strike the 

character and the military service of the accused from the 

factors a commander should consider when deciding how to dispose 

of sex-related offenses under the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 565) that would require that the discussion 

pertaining to Rule 306 of the Manual for Courts-Martial be 

amended, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 

this Act, to strike the character and military service of the 

accused from the factors a commander should consider in deciding 

how to dispose of any offense. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Prohibition of retaliation against members of the armed forces 

for reporting a criminal offense (sec. 1709)
247

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 563) that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

prescribe regulations, not later than 120 days after the 

enactment of this Act, that prohibit retaliation against an 

alleged victim or other member of the armed forces who reports a 

criminal offense. This provision would also require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress, not later 

than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, setting forth 

recommendations as to whether the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice should be amended to prohibit retaliation against an 

alleged victim or other member of the armed forces who reports a 

criminal offense.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Subtitle B-Other Amendments to Title 10, 

United States Code

Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who 

have been convicted of certain sexual offenses (sec. 1711)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 531) that would amend chapter 37 of title 10, United 

States Code, to prohibit the commissioning or enlistment in the 

armed forces of individuals who have been convicted of felony 

offenses of rape or sexual assault, forcible sodomy, incest, or 

of an attempt to commit these offenses. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding 

consideration of request for permanent change of station or unit 

transfer by victim of sexual assault (sec. 1712)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 534) that would 

amend section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, to clarify 

that the requirement for timely determination and action on an 

application by a victim of certain sexual offenses for a change 

of station or unit transfer applies to the Coast Guard.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 533).

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member of 

the armed forces on active duty who is accused of committing a 
248

sexual assault or related offense (sec. 1713)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 535) that would 

authorize service secretaries to provide guidance for commanders 

regarding their authority to make a timely determination and to 

take action regarding whether a service member serving on active 

duty who is alleged to have committed specified sexual offenses 

under the Uniform Code of Military Justice should be temporarily 

reassigned or removed from a position of authority or from an 

assignment, not as a punitive measure, but solely for the 

purpose of maintaining good order and discipline within the 

unit.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 532).

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected 

communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited 

retaliatory actions (sec. 1714)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 527) that would 

amend section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, to enhance 

protections for military whistleblowers. The House provision 

would: expand the categories of prohibited personnel actions; 

expand the class of communications protected under the statute; 

increase the time period during which an allegation of reprisal 

must be investigated from 60 days to 1 year; require Department 

of Defense Inspectors General to make explicit determinations as 

to whether a prohibited personnel action had occurred, a 

determination that is now made by the Secretary concerned; 

require the Secretary concerned, in cases where a violation 

occurred, to take corrective action on behalf of the 

whistleblower and appropriate disciplinary action against the 

individual who committed the prohibited personnel action; 

require military legal assistance before a board for correction 

of military records on behalf of whistleblowers; and apply the 

burdens of proof applicable in civilian whistleblower cases 

under title 5, United States Code, to military whistleblower 

cases.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 511) that would amend section 1034 of title 10, 

United States Code, to: expand the categories of prohibited 

personnel actions and class of protected communications under 

the statute; increase the time period during which an allegation 

of reprisal must be investigated from 60 days to 180 days; 

retain the authority of the Secretary concerned to make the 

determination as to whether reprisal occurred, but require such 
249

Secretary to make such a determination within 30 days of 

receiving a report from an Inspector General, and if so 

determined, to take corrective action on behalf of the 

whistleblower and appropriate disciplinary action against the 

individual who committed the prohibited personnel action; and 

retain the current burdens of proof applicable to military 

whistleblower cases.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would: increase the time period during which an 

allegation of reprisal must be investigated from 60 days to 1 

year; authorize military legal assistance before a board for 

correction of military records on behalf of a whistleblower in 

cases where the Judge Advocate General concerned determines that 

the whistleblower would benefit from such assistance; and 

require that the Inspector General investigation be conducted 

outside the immediate chain of command, or at least one 

organization higher in the chain of command, relative to the 

whistleblower and the person alleged to have taken the 

retaliatory action.

Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory 

personnel actions taken in response to making protected 

communications regarding sexual assault (sec. 1715)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 537) that would 

amend section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, to 

require the Inspector General to review and investigate 

allegations of retaliatory personnel actions for making a 

protected communication regarding violations of law or 

regulation that prohibit rape, sexual assault, or other sexual 

misconduct.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 542). 

The agreement includes the House provision.

Designation and availability of Special Victims’ Counsel for 

victims of sex-related offenses (sec. 1716)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 536) that would 

amend chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, to require 

service secretaries to designate legal counsel (to be known as 

“Victims’ Counsel”) for the purpose of providing legal 

assistance to an individual eligible for legal assistance who is 

the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, regardless of 

whether the report of that offense is restricted or 

unrestricted. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 
250

provision (sec. 539) that would require the service secretaries 

to implement a program to provide a Special Victims’ Counsel to 

service members who are victims of a sexual assault committed by 

a member of the armed forces. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment clarifying the types of legal assistance that may be 

provided under this provision.

Subtitle C-Amendments to Other Laws

Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in conducting 

organizational climate assessments for purposes of preventing 

and responding to sexual assaults (sec. 1721)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 522) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to direct service secretaries 

to verify and track the compliance of commanding officers in 

conducting organizational climate assessments required as part 

of the comprehensive policy for the Department of Defense sexual 

assault prevention and response program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would amend section 572 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to 

require the Secretary of Defense to direct the service 

secretaries to verify and track the compliance of commanding 

officers in conducting organizational climate assessments.

Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent 

panel on assessment of military response systems to sexual 

assault (sec. 1722)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 549(b)) that 

would amend section 576(c)(1)(B) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to 

provide that the panel established to conduct an independent 

review and assessment of the systems used to investigate, 

prosecute, and adjudicate crimes involving sexual assault and 

related offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice 

would terminate no later than one year after the first meeting 

of the panel. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 543).

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted Reports 
251

and Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving members of 

the Armed Forces (sec. 1723)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 538) that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure 

that copies of Department of Defense Forms 2910 and 2911 filed 

in connection with Restricted Reports and Unrestricted Reports 

of sexual assault are retained for the longer of 50 years or the 

period that such forms are required to be retained pursuant to 

Department of Defense directives. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by members 

of the National Guard and Reserves (sec. 1724)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 537) that would require service secretaries to ensure that 

each member of the National Guard or Reserves who is the victim 

of a sexual assault either during the performance of duties as a 

member of the National Guard or Reserves, or is a victim of a 

sexual assault by another member of the National Guard or 

Reserves, has access to a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator 

not later than 2 business days following a request for such 

assistance. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require that each member of the National 

Guard or Reserves who is the victim of a sexual assault either 

during the performance of duties as a member of the National 

Guard or Reserves, or is a victim of a sexual assault by another 

member of the National Guard or Reserves, has timely access to a 

Sexual Assault Response Coordinator.

Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense sexual 

assault prevention and response personnel and required 

availability of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (sec. 1725)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 541) that would 

amend section 1602(e)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) to 

require the Secretary of Defense to establish selection 

qualifications for members of the armed forces or civilian 

employees for assignment to duty as Sexual Assault Response and 

Prevention Program Managers, Sexual Assault Response 

Coordinators, and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates. In addition, 

this provision would require the Secretary of each military 
252

department to assign at least one Sexual Assault Nurse ExaminerAdult/Adolescent to each brigade or equivalent unit level unless 

the Secretary determines that compliance would impose an undue 

burden. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 536(b)) that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

review the adequacy of the training, qualifications, and 

experience of service members and civilian employees assigned to 

a position that includes responsibility for sexual assault 

prevention and response.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would: (1) Require the assignment of at least one 

full-time sexual assault nurse examiner to each military medical 

treatment facility in which an emergency department operates 24 

hours per day; (2) Require that a sexual assault nurse examiner 

be made available at other military medical treatment 

facilities, consistent with the Department of Justice National 

Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations, 

Adult/Adolescent; and (3) Require that the Secretary of Defense 

submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

Senate and the House of Representatives, not later than 120 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, on the review of the 

adequacy of the training, qualifications, and experience of 

service members and civilian employees assigned to positions 

that include responsibility for sexual assault prevention and 

response in the armed forces.

We encourage the Department of Defense to include board 

certification to the extent possible as part of the training and 

certification requirement for sexual assault nurse examiners.

Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and 

Response Office for Department of Defense sexual assault 

prevention and response program (sec. 1726)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 535) that would amend section 1611(b) of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111-383) to require the Director of the Sexual Assault 

Prevention and Response Office (the Director) to: (1) oversee 

development and implementation of the comprehensive policy for 

the Department of Defense (DOD) sexual assault prevention and 

response program; (2) serve as the single point of authority, 

accountability, and oversight for the sexual assault prevention 

and response program; (3) undertake responsibility for the 

oversight of the implementation of the sexual assault prevention 

and response program by the armed forces; (4) collect and 

maintain data of the military departments on sexual assault; (5) 
253

provide oversight to ensure that the military departments 

maintain documents relating to allegations and complaints of 

sexual assault involving service members and courts-martial or 

trials of service members for sexual assault offenses; (6) act 

as a liaison between DOD and other federal and state agencies on 

programs and efforts relating to sexual assault prevention and 

response; (7) oversee development of strategic program guidance 

and joint planning objectives for resources in support of the 

sexual assault prevention and response program, and make 

recommendations on modifications to policy, law, and regulations 

needed to ensure the continuing availability of such resources; 

and (8) provide the Secretary of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs (VA) any records or documents on sexual assault in the 

armed forces, including restricted reports with the approval of 

the individuals who filed such reports, that are required for 

the purposes of the administration of the laws administered by 

the Secretary of the VA. 

The provision would amend subtitle A of title XVI of the 

Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2011 (Public Law 111-383) to require the Director to collect and 

maintain data from the services on sexual assaults involving 

service members and to develop metrics to measure the 

effectiveness of, and compliance with, the training and 

awareness objectives on sexual assault and prevention. 

The provision would also amend section 1631(f) of the Ike 

Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(Public Law 111-383) to require the service secretaries to 

include in the case synopsis portion of the annual report

regarding sexual assaults involving members of the armed forces 

the unit of each service member accused of committing a sexual 

assault and the unit of each service member who is a victim of a 

sexual assault.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would amend section 

1611(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) to require the 

Director to collect and maintain data of the military 

departments on sexual assault; act as a liaison between DOD and 

other federal and state agencies on programs and efforts 

relating to sexual assault prevention and response; oversee 

development of strategic program guidance and joint planning 

objectives for resources in support of the sexual assault 

prevention and response program, and make recommendations on 

modifications to policy, law, and regulations needed to ensure 

the continuing availability of such resources; and develop 

metrics to measure the effectiveness of, and compliance with, 

training and awareness objectives of the military departments on 
254

sexual assault prevention and response.

Subtitle D-Studies, Reviews, Policies, and 

Reports

Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military 

Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases (sec. 

1731)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 533(c)) that 

would require the Response Systems Panel established under 

subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) 

(FY13 NDAA) to assess the appropriateness of statutorily 

mandated minimum sentencing provisions for additional offenses 

under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and would 

require the Judicial Proceedings Panel established under 

subsection (a)(2) of the FY13 NDAA to assess the implementation 

and effect of the mandatory minimum sentences established 

elsewhere in this bill.

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 536(c)) that 

would require the Response Systems Panel to conduct an 

assessment regarding whether the roles, responsibilities, and 

authorities of Victims’ Counsel to provide legal assistance to 

victims of alleged sex-related offenses should be expanded to 

include legal standing to represent the victim during 

investigative and military justice proceedings in connection 

with the prosecution of the offense; and would require the 

Judicial Proceedings Panel to conduct an assessment of the 

implementation and effect of authorizing Victims’ Counsel to 

provide legal assistance to victims of alleged sex-related 

offenses.

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 542(c)) that 

would require the Response Systems Panel to assess the 

feasibility and appropriateness of extending to victims of 

military crimes the additional right afforded a crime victim in 

civilian criminal legal proceedings under subsection (a)(4) of 

section 3771 of title 18, United States Code, and the legal 

standing to seek enforcement of crime victim rights provided by 

subsection (d) of such section.

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 549 (a),(c), and 

(d)) that would require the Response Systems Panel to conduct an 

assessment of the impact, if any, that removing from the chain 

of command any disposition authority regarding charges preferred 

under the UCMJ would have on overall reporting and prosecution 

of sexual assault cases, and to review and provide comment on 
255

the report of the Secretary of Defense on the role of military 

commanders in the military justice process required elsewhere in 

this Act; and would require the Judicial Proceedings Panel to 

assess the likely consequences of amending of the definition of 

rape and sexual assault under Article 120 of the UCMJ to 

expressly cover a situation in which a person subject to the 

UCMJ commits a sexual act upon another person by abusing one’s 

position in the chain of command of the other person to gain 

access to or coerce the other person.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 544) that would require the Response Systems Panel to 

include in the comparison of military and civilian systems for 

the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of adult sexual 

assault crimes, required by section 576(d)(1)(B), an assessment 

of the opportunities for clemency provided in the military and 

civilian systems, the appropriateness of clemency proceedings in 

the military system, the manner in which clemency is used in the 

military system, and whether clemency in the military justice 

system could be reserved until the end of the military appeals 

process. The provision would also require the Response Systems 

Panel to assess the means by which the name, if known, and other 

necessary identifying information of an alleged offender that is 

collected as part of a restricted report of a sexual assault 

could be compiled into a protected, searchable database.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 546) that would require the Judicial Proceedings Panel to 

assess the adequacy of the provision of compensation and 

restitution for victims of offenses under the UCMJ, and develop 

recommendations on expanding such compensation and restitution.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 545) that would require the Response Systems Panel and the 

Judicial Proceedings Panel to assess the effectiveness of 

provisions of law on sexual assault prevention and response 

adopted and provisions offered but not adopted during the markup 

by the Senate Committee on Armed Services of the bill to enact 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.

The agreement includes a provision that would consolidate 

the provisions, delete redundant provisions, and align the 

additional responsibilities as appropriate under the Response 

Systems Panel and the Judicial Proceedings Panel.

Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative 

practices in response to allegations of Uniform Code of Military 

Justice violations (sec. 1732)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 539) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to review the practices of 
256

military criminal investigative organizations (MCIO) regarding 

the investigation of alleged sex-related offenses involving 

members of the armed forces, including the extent to which the 

MCIOs make a recommendation regarding whether an allegation of a 

sex-related offense appears founded or unfounded, and to develop 

a uniform policy regarding the use of case determinations to 

record the results of investigations of violations of the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would expand the scope of the review to MCIO 

investigations of allegations of any offense under the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice.

Review of training and education provided members of the Armed 

Forces on sexual assault prevention and response (sec. 1733)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 540) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to develop a uniform 

curriculum, to include lesson plans, to ensure that sexual 

assault prevention and response training and education for 

members of the armed forces are uniform across the Department of 

Defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 536(a)) that would require the Secretary to review the 

adequacy of the training provided to service members on sexual 

assault prevention and response, and to prescribe any 

modifications necessary to the training provided members of the 

armed forces on sexual assault prevention and response. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

identify common core elements that must be included in any 

training or education provided to service members on sexual 

assault prevention and response and to submit a report 

containing the results of the review, including the common core 

elements identified in the review, to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives not 

later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy on the 

retention of and access to evidence and records relating to 

sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces (sec. 

1734)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550G) that would 

amend section 1631(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense 
257

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) to 

require service secretaries to include in their annual reports 

to the Secretary of Defense on sexual assaults: (1) A 

description of the implementation of the comprehensive policy on 

the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to 

sexual assaults involving service members; and (2) The policies, 

procedures, and the processes implemented by the secretary 

concerned to ensure detailed evidence and records are 

transmitted to the Department of Veterans Affairs for sexual 

trauma that occurred during active duty service. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the progress made in 

developing and implementing the comprehensive policy on the 

retention and access to evidence and records relating to sexual 

assaults involving service members and to submit a report 

containing the results of the review to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives not 

later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal 

Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases (sec. 1735)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the 

Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity for the

purposes of identifying resource and personnel gaps in the 

office, the role of the office in sexual harassment cases, and 

evaluating how the office works with the Sexual Assault 

Prevention and Response Office to address sexual assault in the 

armed forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to 

determine whether sexual harassment cases should be evaluated or 

addressed within the Office of Diversity Management and Equal 

Opportunity and to identify and assess the capability of the 

Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity to track 

sexual harassment cases.

Subtitle E-Other Matters

Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members of 

the Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training 

(sec. 1741)
258

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 548) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense and the secretary of the 

department in which the Coast Guard is operating to maintain a 

policy that defines and prescribes what constitutes an 

inappropriate relationship, communication, conduct, or contact, 

including when such an action is consensual, between a service 

member who exercises authority or control over, or supervises a 

prospective member of the armed forces undergoing entry-level 

processing or training. The provision would also require that a 

service member who violates this policy be processed for 

administrative separation when the member is not otherwise 

punitively discharged or dismissed from the armed forces for 

that violation, and would require the Secretary of Defense to 

submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives a proposed amendment to chapter 47 of 

title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice), to create an additional article regarding violations 

of the policy described above.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 557) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives, not later than 120 days after the enactment 

of this act, a report on whether legislative action is required 

to modify the Uniform Code of Military Justice (chapter 47 of 

title 10, United States Code), to prohibit sexual acts and 

contacts between military instructors and their trainees.

The agreement includes a provision that would combine the 

House and Senate provisions.

Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses 

involving members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1742)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 541) that would require commanding officers to immediately 

refer to the appropriate military criminal investigation 

organization reports of sex-related offenses involving members 

of the commander’s chain of command. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to 

unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim is a 

member of the Armed Forces (sec. 1743)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 545) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the 
259

Department in which the Coast Guard is operating to establish 

and maintain a policy for a written incident report to detail 

actions taken or in progress to provide the victim of a sexual 

assault with necessary care and support, to refer the allegation 

of sexual assault to the appropriate investigative agency, and 

to provide initial notification to the chain of command above 

the unit in which the victim served when such notification had 

not already taken place. This provision would require the 

incident report to be provided within 8 days of the unrestricted 

report of a sexual assault, and would require the Secretary of 

Defense to prescribe regulations to carry out the policy within 

180 days of the date of enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related 

offenses for trial by court-martial (sec. 1744)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 552) that would require review of decisions not to refer 

charges of rape or sexual assault, forcible sodomy, or attempts 

to commit these offenses to trial by court-martial. In any case 

in which the staff judge advocate recommends that the charges be 

referred to trial by court-martial and the convening authority 

decides not to refer the charges to trial by court-martial, the 

convening authority would be required to forward the case file 

to the service secretary for review. In cases where the staff 

judge advocate recommends that the charges not be referred to 

trial by court-martial and the convening authority agrees, the 

convening authority would be required to forward the case file 

to a superior commander authorized to exercise general courtmartial convening authority for review.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Inclusion and command review of information on sex-related 

offenses in personnel service records of members of the Armed 

Forces (sec. 1745)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 547) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to require commanders to 

include letters of reprimand, nonpunitive letters of actions and 

counseling statements involving substantiated cases of sexual 

harassment or sexual assault in the performance evaluation 
260

reports of service members.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 534) that would require that complaints of a sex-related 

offense resulting in a court-martial conviction, non-judicial 

punishment, or administrative action be noted in the personnel 

service record of the service member, regardless of the member’s 

grade. The provision would also require the Secretary of 

Defense to prescribe regulations requiring commanders to review 

the history of substantiated sexual offenses of service members 

permanently assigned to the commander’s facility, installation, 

or unit.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies (sec. 

1746)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550D) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that each of the 

military service academies adds a section in the ethics 

curricula of such academies that outlines honor, respect, and 

character development as such pertain to the issue of preventing 

sexual assault in the armed forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

curricula of each of the military service academies to include a 

section that outlines honor, respect, and character development 

as such pertain to the issue of preventing sexual assault in the 

armed forces and that the training included in the curricula be 

provided within 14 days after the initial arrival of a new cadet 

or midshipman at the military service academy and repeated 

annually thereafter.

Required notification whenever members of the Armed Forces are 

completing Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National 

Security Positions (sec. 1747)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550E) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to inform service members at 

the earliest time possible, such as upon enlistment and 

commissioning, and during sexual assault awareness training and 

service member interactions with sexual assault response 

coordinators, of the policy of instructing an individual to 

answer “no” to question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the 

Questionnaire for National Security Positions with respect to 

consultation with a health care professional if the individual 
261

is a victim of sexual assault and the consultation occurred with 

respect to an emotional or mental health condition strictly in 

relation to the sexual assault.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require that a service member be notified 

of the policy of instructing an individual to answer “no” to 

question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for 

National Security Positions with respect to consultation with a 

health care professional if the individual is a victim of sexual 

assault and the consultation occurred with respect to an 

emotional or mental health condition strictly in relation to the 

sexual assault whenever the member is required to complete 

Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security 

Positions.

Subtitle F-Sense of Congress Provisions

Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for 

command climate free of retaliation (sec. 1751)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 540) that would express the sense of Congress that: (1) 

commanding officers are responsible for establishing a command 

climate in which sexual assault allegations are properly managed 

and fairly evaluated and a victim can report criminal activity, 

including sexual assault, without fear of retaliation, including 

ostracism and group pressure from other members of the command; 

(2) the failure of commanding officers to maintain such a 

command climate is an appropriate basis for relief from their 

command positions; and (3) senior officers should evaluate 

subordinate commanding officers on their performance in 

establishing a command climate free of retaliation. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

technical amendment.

Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving certain 

sexual misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice through courts-martial (sec. 1752)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 558) that would express the sense of the Senate that 

charges of rape, sexual assault, forcible sodomy, or attempts to 

commit these offenses should be disposed of by court-martial 

rather than by non-judicial punishment or administrative action, 
262

and that the disposition authority should include in the case 

file a justification in any case where these charges are 

disposed of by non-judicial punishment or administrative action. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would express the sense of Congress.

Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-martial of 

members of the Armed Forces who commit sex-related offenses 

(sec. 1753)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 559) that would express the sense of the Senate that: (1) 

the armed forces should be sparing in discharging in lieu of 

court-martial service members who have committed rape, sexual 

assault, forcible sodomy, or attempts to commit such offenses, 

and should do so only when the facts of the case clearly warrant 

such discharge; (2) whenever possible, victims of these offenses 

should be consulted about the discharge of the service member; 

(3) commanding officers should consider the views of these 

victims when determining whether to discharge service members in 

lieu of court-martial; and (4) discharges of service members in 

lieu of court-martial for the specified offenses should be 

characterized as Other Than Honorable. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a

clarifying amendment that would express a sense of Congress.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Servicemembers’ accountability, rights, and responsibilities 

training

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530A) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that all service 

members understand and comply with specified rights and 

responsibilities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of 

separation of members of the Armed Forces who made unrestricted 

reports of sexual assault 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530B) that would 

require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to 
263

conduct a review to identify all members of the armed forces 

who, since January 1, 2002, were separated from the armed forces 

after making an unrestricted report of sexual assault. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in military 

justice process

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 538) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to assess the current role and 

authorities of commanders in the administration of military 

justice and the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of 

offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Enhancement to requirements for availability of information on 

sexual assault prevention and response resources

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550B) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that information 

relating to sexual assault prevention and response and resource 

information is prominently posted in specified locations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that section 572(a)(4) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) 

requires the Department of Defense to “post and widely 

disseminate information about the resources available to report 

and respond to sexual assaults, including the establishment of a 

hotline phone number and Internet websites available to all 

members of the armed forces.” We further understand that the 

Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office is currently 

updating existing policy to include this requirement, and look 

forward to the final policy being published as soon as possible.

Health welfare inspections 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 564) that would 

require the secretary of each military department to conduct 

health and welfare inspections on a monthly basis to ensure and 

maintain security, military readiness, and good order and 

discipline. 
264

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.
265

DIVISION B–MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

AUTHORIZATIONS

Summary and explanation of funding tables

Division B of this Act authorizes funding for military 

construction projects of the Department of Defense. It includes 

funding authorizations for the construction and operation of 

military family housing as well as military construction for the 

reserve components, the defense agencies, and the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. It also 

provides authorization for the base closure accounts that fund 

military construction, environmental cleanup, and other 

activities required to implement the decisions in base closure 

rounds. 

The following tables provide the project-level 

authorizations for the military construction funding authorized 

in Division B of this Act and summarize that funding by account. 

Funding for base closure projects is summarized in the table 

that follows, and is explained in additional detail in the table 

included in title XXVII of this report.

Legislative Provisions Adopted

Short title (sec. 2001)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2001) that would 

designate division B of this Act as the Military Construction 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 2001).

The agreement includes this provision.

Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be 

specified by law (sec. 2002)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2002) that would 

ensure that the authorizations provided in titles XXI through 

XXVII and XXIX shall expire on October 1, 2016, or the date of 

enactment of an act authorizing funds for military construction 

for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2002).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.
266

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Effective date

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2003) that would 

provide that titles XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XXV, XXVI, XXVII, 

and XXIX of this Act take effect on October 1, 2013, or the date 

of enactment of this Act, whichever is later.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

TITLE XXI–ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Summary

The Department of Defense requested authorization of 

appropriations of $1.1 billion for military construction and 

$556.9 million for family housing for the Army for fiscal year 

2014. The agreement includes authorization of appropriations of 

$1.1 billion for military construction and $556.9 million for 

family housing for the Army for fiscal year 2014.

The budget request included $75.0 million for a Command and 

Control facility for U.S. Army Pacific. While we support the 

requirement for this facility, we are concerned that the unit 

cost for this facility is high compared to a standard design 

even when accounting for Area Cost Factors. Additionally, we 

believe the full amount requested by the Department is not 

necessary in light of efforts to reduce the size of headquarters 

staffs across the Department. Therefore, the agreement includes 

$70.0 million, a reduction of $5.0 million, for this facility.

The budget request included $33.0 million for Host Nation 

Support Planning and Design. In light of unobligated balances 

in the Planning and Design accounts from previous years, the 

agreement reflects a $5.0 million reduction.

Legislative Provisions Adopted

Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2101)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2101) that would 

authorize military construction projects for the active 

component of the Army for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 
267

provision (sec. 2101).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision 

on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of 

projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act 

provides the binding list of specific construction projects 

authorized at each location.

Family housing (sec. 2102)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2102) that would 

authorize new construction and planning and design of family 

housing units for the Army for fiscal year 2014. It would also 

authorize funds for facilities that support family housing, 

including housing management offices and housing maintenance and 

storage facilities.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2102).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Authorization of appropriations, Army (sec. 2103)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2103) that would 

authorize appropriations for the active component military 

construction and family housing projects of the Army for fiscal 

year 2014. This provision would also provide an overall 

limitation on the cost of the fiscal year 2014 military 

construction and family housing projects authorized for the 

active duty component of the Army.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2103).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States 

Military Academy, New York (sec. 2104)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 2109) that would prohibit the obligation or expenditure of 

funds for the second increment of barracks construction at the 

U.S. Military Academy (USMA), New York, as requested, until the 

Secretary of the Army certifies to the congressional defense 

committees that the Secretary has entered into a contract for 

the renovation of MacArthur Short Barracks at the USMA, 

consistent with the plan provided to the congressional defense 

committees in March 2013.
268

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of the Army to 

certify to the congressional defense committees that the 

Secretary intends to award a contract for the renovation of 

MacArthur Short Barracks concurrent with assuming beneficial 

occupancy of the renovated Scott Barracks.

Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 

project (sec. 2105)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2104) that would 

provide additional authority for a project initially provided in 

section 2101 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136) at Picatinny 

Arsenal, New Jersey, for construction of a Research and 

Development Loading Facility.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2106).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 

project (sec. 2106)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2105) that would 

modify the authorization contained in section 2101(b) of the 

Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(division B of Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2629) for 

construction of an APS Warehouses at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2105).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 

project (sec. 2107)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2106) that would 

modify the authorization contained in section 2101(a) of the 

Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4437) for 

construction of a Regional Logistic Support Complex at Fort 

Lewis, Washington.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2104).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.
269

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects 

(sec. 2108)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2107) that would 

extend the authorizations for three projects originally 

authorized by section 2002 of the Military Construction 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 

11-84) until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an 

act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 

2015, whichever is later.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2108).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects 

(sec. 2109)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2108) that would 

extend the authorizations listed until October 1, 2014, or the 

date of the enactment of an act authorizing funds for military 

construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 2107).

The agreement includes this provision.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill, 

Dahlonega, Georgia

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2109) that would 

require the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer certain Federal 

land administered as part of the Chattahoochee National Forest 

to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We believe that the current agreement between the 

Department of Agriculture and the Department of the Army related 

to an Army Ranger training area at Camp Frank D. Merrill in 

Dahlonega, Georgia, is inadequate to support the existing 

missions of the Department of the Army. We note that Secretary 

of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture have entered into 

discussions to address procedures for management and 

administration of the property that we expect will ameliorate 

these concerns. We urge the Secretary of the Army and the 
270

Secretary of Agriculture to expeditiously conclude these 

discussions to preserve and enhance the training and military 

readiness capacity at Camp Frank D. Merrill. Lastly, we direct 

the Secretary of the Army to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees on the status of negotiations 

not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act and 

summarizing the results of the negotiations not later than 90 

days after an agreement is reached.

Authorized Army construction and land acquisition project

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2901) that would 

authorize Army construction projects for fiscal year 2014 at 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The provision would also require the 

Secretary of Defense to provide a brief to the congressional 

defense committees on infrastructure costs associated with 

continued detention operations at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and 

would require the President to provide a plan relating to 

detainees at Guantanamo Bay, future terrorist captures, and 

detainees held at the detention Facility at Parwan, Afghanistan.

The Senate committee-reported bill did not contain a 

similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

TITLE XXII–NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Summary

The Department of Defense requested authorization of 

appropriations of $1.7 billion for military construction and 

$463.2 million for family housing for the Department of the Navy 

for fiscal year 2014. The agreement includes the requested 

amounts.

Legislative Provisions Adopted

Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2201)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2201) that would 

authorize military construction projects for the active 

component of the Navy for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2201).

The agreement includes the House provision.

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision 

on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of 
271

projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act 

provides the binding list of specific construction projects 

authorized at each location.

Family housing (sec. 2202)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2202) that would 

authorize new construction and planning and design of family 

housing units for the Navy for fiscal year 2014. It would also 

authorize funds for facilities that support family housing, 

including housing management offices and housing maintenance and 

storage facilities.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2202).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2203) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2203) that would 

authorize funding for fiscal year 2014 to improve existing Navy 

family housing. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2203). 

The agreement includes the House provision.

Authorization of appropriations, Navy (sec. 2204)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2204) that would 

authorize appropriations for the active component military 

construction and family housing projects of the Navy for fiscal 

year 2014. This provision would also provide an overall 

limitation on the cost of the fiscal year 2014 military 

construction and family housing projects authorized for the 

active duty component of the Navy.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2204).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 

project (sec. 2205)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2206) that would 

modify the authorization contained in section 2201(b) of the 

Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4441), for 

construction of Navy Central Command ammunition magazines in 
272

Bahrain.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2206).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 

project (sec. 2206)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2207) that would 

modify the authorization contained in section 2201(a) of the 

Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1666) for 

construction of Explosives Handling Wharf No. 2 at Kitsap, 

Washington.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2205).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects 

(sec. 2207)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2208) that would 

extend the fiscal year 2011 authorization for two projects until 

October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act 

authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 

2015, whichever is later.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2207) that would extend the fiscal year 2011 

authorization for one project until October 1, 2014, or the date 

of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 

construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later and 

another similar provision (sec. 2208) that would extend the 

fiscal year 2011 authorization for one project until October 1, 

2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 

for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is 

later.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal 

year 2014 project

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2205) that would 

prohibit the Secretary of the Navy from obligating or expending 

any funds authorized for land acquisition related to the 

Townsend Bombing Range near Savannah, Georgia, until the 
273

Secretary certifies in writing to the congressional defense 

committees that the Secretary has entered into mutuallyacceptable agreements with the governments of Long and McIntosh 

Counties, Georgia.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

The agreement includes an authorization of $61.7 million to 

acquire real estate interests as the first phase of an expansion 

of the Townsend Bombing Range in Georgia in order to support the 

training of Navy and Marine Corps aviators in air-to-ground 

employment of precision guided munitions. Considering the fact 

that the first phase of the expansion will require the purchase 

of approximately 20,000 acres from private entities, we expect 

that the Department of the Navy will continue efforts to engage 

community representatives from Long County, Georgia and McIntosh 

County, Georgia with the goal of achieving a mutually acceptable 

agreement regarding terms for the real property to be acquired 

for the expansion of the Townsend Bombing Range that protects 

and supports the mission of the range.

TITLE XXIII–AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Summary

The Department of Defense requested authorization of 

appropriations of $1.1 billion for military construction and 

$464.9 million for family housing for the Air Force in fiscal 

year 2014. The agreement includes authorization of 

appropriations of $1.1 billion for military construction and 

$464.9 million for family housing for fiscal year 2014.

The budget request included $192.7 million for KC-46A Main 

Operating Base (MOB) #1 facilities and $63.0 million for KC-46A 

Formal Training Unit (FTU) facilities at unspecified locations. 

On May 22, 2013, the Air Force announced McConnell Air Force 

Base, Kansas, as its preferred alternative for the KC-46A MOB #1 

and Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma, as its preferred alternative 

for the KC-46A FTU. Concurrent with this announcement, the Air 

Force also requested an amendment to its budget request 

specifying location-specific requirements for KC-46A bed down, 

including $219.1 million for eight military construction 

projects at McConnell Air Force Base and $30.9 million for five 

military construction projects at Altus Air Force Base. The 

agreement reflects these amounts.

The budget request included $12.0 million for a Main Gate 

Complex at Royal Air Force Station Croughton, United Kingdom. 

The House bill included no funding for this project and the 
274

report accompanying the House bill (H.Rept. 113-102) directed 

the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional 

defense committees by September 30, 2013, regarding the costs 

and benefits of locating various intelligence functions at the 

installation. The required report has not been provided to the 

congressional defense committees and, therefore, the agreement 

includes no funding for this project.

Legislative Provisions Adopted

Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects 

(sec. 2301)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2301) that would 

authorize military construction projects for the active 

component of the Air Force for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2301).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision 

on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of 

projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act 

provides the binding list of specific construction projects 

authorized at each location.

Family housing (sec. 2302)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2302) that would 

authorize new construction and planning and design of family 

housing units for the Air Force for fiscal year 2014. It would 

also authorize funds for facilities that support family housing, 

including housing management offices and housing maintenance and 

storage facilities.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2302).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2303) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2303) that would 

authorize funding for fiscal year 2014 to improve existing Air 

Force family housing. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2303). 

The agreement includes the House provision.
275

Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (sec. 2304)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2304) that would 

authorize appropriations for the active component military 

construction and family housing projects of the Air Force for 

fiscal year 2014. This provision would also provide an overall 

limitation on the cost of the fiscal year 2014 military 

construction and family housing projects authorized for the 

active duty component of the Air Force.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2304).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal 

year 2014 project (sec. 2305)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2306) that would 

limit the Secretary of the Air Force from expending any funds 

authorized by this title that are associated with the 

construction of a maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad, 

or an airport storage facility at Saipan, Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands, until the Secretary certifies that the 

Department of the Air Force will purchase the requisite real 

estate necessary to support these projects.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would limit funds for the construction of 

projects in fiscal year 2014 to support divert field operations 

in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands until the 

Secretary of the Air Force provides a summary of alternatives 

considered, a description of the overall construction 

requirements, and a comparison of the costs and benefits of 

leasing compared to purchasing real estate to support the divert 

field requirements. 

 In addition, we note that the Governor of the Commonwealth 

of the Northern Mariana Islands has expressed concerns regarding 

the proposed location of the divert field and whether it should 

be sited on Saipan or Tinian. As such, we expect the Secretary 

of the Air Force to consult with the Governor of the 

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands regarding the 

location of projects to support divert field operations with the 

goal of achieving a mutually agreeable solution.

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 

project (sec. 2306)
276

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2305) that would 

increase the construction scope associated with a Fuel Systems 

Maintenance Hangar authorization at Andersen Air Force Base, 

Guam, provided in the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239), to 

$128.0 million.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project 

(sec. 2307)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2307) that would 

extend the authorization listed until October 1, 2014, or the 

date of the enactment of an act authorizing funds for military 

construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2305).

The agreement includes the House provision.

TITLE XXIV–DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION

Budget Items

Summary

The Department of Defense (DOD) requested authorization of 

appropriations of $4.0 billion for military construction for the 

defense agencies, $150.0 million for energy conservation 

projects, $122.5 million for chemical demilitarization 

construction, and $57.6 million for family housing for the 

defense agencies for fiscal year 2014. The agreement includes 

authorization of appropriations of $3.4 billion for military 

construction, $150.0 million for energy conservation projects,

$122.5 million for chemical demilitarization construction, and 

$57.6 million for family housing for the defense agencies for 

fiscal year 2014.

The budget request included $431.0 million for the third 

increment of the High Performance Computing Center at Fort 

Meade, Maryland. We understand DOD would be unable to expend 

the full amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, 

therefore, the agreement reflects a $35.0 million reduction.

The budget request included $265.0 million for an 
277

Ambulatory Health Center at Fort Knox, Kentucky. We understand 

DOD would be unable to expend the full amount of the budget 

request in fiscal year 2014 and, therefore, the agreement 

reflects a $120.0 million reduction.

The budget request included $210.0 million for replacement 

of the Public Health Command Laboratory at Aberdeen Proving 

Ground, Maryland. We understand DOD would be unable to expend 

the full amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, 

therefore, the agreement reflects a $135.0 million reduction.

The budget request included $76.2 million for the second 

increment of the Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base Andrews, 

Maryland. We understand DOD would be unable to expend the full 

amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, therefore, 

the agreement reflects a $38.1 million reduction.

The budget request included $251.2 million for the fifth 

increment of the Hospital Replacement at Fort Bliss, Texas. We 

understand DOD would be unable to expend the full amount of the 

budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, therefore, the agreement 

reflects a $152.1 million reduction.

The budget request included $151.5 million for the third 

increment of the Medical Center Replacement at Rhine Ordnance 

Barracks, Germany. We understand DOD would be unable to expend 

the full amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, 

therefore, the agreement reflects a $75.0 million reduction.

The budget request included $1.8 million for a Tour Bus 

Drop Off at the Pentagon Reservation, Virginia. We believe this 

project is unjustified given the current fiscal pressures facing 

DOD and does little to improve the safety of visitors to the 

Pentagon and, therefore, the agreement includes no funding for 

this project.

The budget request included $85.0 million for the second 

increment of the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Systems Complex in 

Deveselu, Romania. We understand that this project was awarded 

significantly below the authorized level and, therefore, the 

agreement reflects a $5.0 million reduction.

The budget request included $10.0 million for Contingency 

Construction. In light of unobligated balances in the 

Contingency Construction account from previous years, the 

agreement reflects a $10.0 million reduction.

U.S. Special Operations Command Military Construction 

Requirements

The budget request included a total of $32.9 million for 

three military construction projects that support Special 

Operations Forces (SOF) Resiliency and Human Performance 

Centers.
278

The House bill did not authorize the three military 

construction projects because of concerns about duplication of 

existing physical fitness facilities provided by the military 

services and potential conflicts with medical care provided by 

the TRICARE Management Activity. 

The Senate committee-reported bill included the requested 

funds.

The agreement includes the requested funds.

We fully support the intent of the U.S. Special Operations 

Command (USSOCOM) Preservation of the Force and Families (POTFF) 

initiative. However, we are concerned about the affordability 

of USSOCOM’s current plan for the POTFF and, specifically, its 

projected cost of almost $500.0 million, including $200.0 

million for military construction, across the future year’s 

defense plan (FYDP) in light of current budgetary pressures. We 

are also concerned about the adverse impact of prioritizing 

military construction investments to support the POTFF at the 

expense of other longstanding USSOCOM military construction 

requirements to recapitalize old and failing 

facilities. Lastly, we believe that USSOCOM Major Force Program 

11 (MFP-11) military construction funds should only be used to 

fulfill “special operations-peculiar” facility requirements and 

should not be used to duplicate facilities provided by the 

military services.

In order to better assess USSOCOM’s future military 

construction requirements, we direct the Secretary of Defense, 

concurrent with the budget request for fiscal year 2015, to 

provide the congressional defense committees with an assessment 

of military construction requirements for USSOCOM and those 

necessary to support the USSOCOM POTFF across the FYDP. This 

assessment shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(1) The definition of “SOF-peculiar” as it applies to 

the use of USSOCOM MFP-11 funding to meet military 

construction requirements; 

(2) A description of the decision making process for 

determining whether a military construction project should 

be funded through MFP-11 or by the military services;

(3) An assessment of the feasibility of military 

construction investments to support the POTFF initiative, 

as outlined in the FYDP, in light of current budgetary 

pressures;

(4) The rationale for funding military construction 

projects in support of the POTFF initiative, as outlined in 

the FYDP, through MFP-11 as opposed to the budgets of the 

military services, including a description of any POTFF 

military construction requirements that can be satisfied by 

the military services; 
279

(5) A prioritized list, by component, of military 

construction projects included in the FYDP that support the 

POTFF initiative, including cost and location; and

(6) A detailed listing of all military construction 

facilities within USSOCOM that are failing or have exceeded 

their lifetime of use by component, by function, and by 

military base, and a detailed listing of all unfunded 

USSOCOM military construction requirements by component, 

function and military base.

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations

Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2401)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2401) that would 

authorize military construction projects for the defense 

agencies for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2401).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision 

on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of 

projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act 

provides the binding list of specific construction projects 

authorized at each location.

Authorized energy conservation projects (sec. 2402)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2402) that would 

authorize energy conservation projects for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2402).

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies (sec. 2403)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2403) that would 

authorize appropriations for the construction and family housing 

projects of the defense agencies for fiscal year 2014. This 

provision would also provide an overall limitation on the cost 

of the fiscal year 2014 military construction and family housing 

projects authorized for the defense agencies.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2403).
280

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization 

Authorizations

Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization 

construction, defense-wide (sec. 2411)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2411) that would 

authorize appropriations for military construction projects for 

the chemical demilitarization program for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2411).

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment.

TITLE XXV–NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY 

ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM

Summary

The Department of Defense requested authorization of 

appropriations of $239.7 million for military construction in 

fiscal year 2014 for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 

Security Investment Program. The agreement includes 

authorization of appropriations of $200.0 million for military 

construction in fiscal year 2014 for the North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization Security Investment Program.

We understand that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 

Security Investment Program has expended prior year funds more 

slowly than anticipated and does not require the full requested 

amount for fiscal year 2014. Therefore, the agreement reflects 

a $40.0 million reduction.

Legislative Provisions Adopted

Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2501)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2501) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to make contributions to the 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 

in an amount equal to the sum of the amount specifically 

authorized in section 2502 of this title and the amount of 
281

recoupment due to the United States for construction previously 

financed by the United States.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 2501).

The agreement includes this provision.

Authorization of appropriations, NATO (sec. 2502)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2502) that would 

authorize the U.S. contribution to the North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization Security Investment Program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2502).

The agreement includes the House provision.

TITLE XXVI–GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES 

FACILITIES

Summary

The Department of Defense requested authorization of 

appropriations of $693.3 million for military construction in 

fiscal year 2014 for facilities for the guard and reserve 

components. The agreement includes authorization of 

appropriations of $688.3 million for military construction in 

fiscal year 2014 for facilities for the guard and reserve 

components.

The budget request included $29.0 million for Planning and 

Design for Army National Guard facilities. In light of 

unobligated balances in the Planning and Design accounts from 

previous years, the agreement reflects a $5.0 million reduction.

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and 

Authorization of Appropriations

Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2601)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2601) that would 

authorize military construction projects for the Army National 

Guard for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2601).

The agreement includes the House provision.

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision 
282

on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of 

projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act 

provides the binding list of specific construction projects 

authorized at each location.

Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2602)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2602) that would 

authorize military construction projects for the Army Reserve 

for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2602).

The agreement includes the House provision. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision 

on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of 

projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act 

provides the binding list of specific construction projects 

authorized at each location.

Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction 

and land acquisition projects (sec. 2603)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2603) that would 

authorize military construction projects for the Navy Reserve 

and the Marine Corps Reserve for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2603).

The agreement includes the House provision.

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision 

on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of 

projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act 

provides the binding list of specific construction projects 

authorized at each location.

Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2604)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2604) that would 

authorize military construction projects for the Air National 

Guard for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2604).

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision 

on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of 

projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act 
283

provides the binding list of specific construction projects 

authorized at each location.

Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2605)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2605) that would 

authorize military construction projects for the Air Force 

Reserve for fiscal year 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2605).

The agreement includes the House provision.

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision 

on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of 

projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act 

provides the binding list of specific construction projects 

authorized at each location.

Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve 

(sec. 2606)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2606) that would 

authorize appropriations for the reserve component military 

construction projects for fiscal year 2014. This provision 

would also provide an overall limitation on the cost of the 

fiscal year 2014 military construction projects authorized for 

the reserve components.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2606).

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would prohibit obligation or expenditure of 

authorized funds for military construction projects associated 

with the 175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility at Fort Meade, 

Maryland, or the Cyber/ISR Facility at Martin State Airport, 

Maryland, until the Secretary of Defense makes several 

certifications to the congressional defense committees.

Subtitle B—Other Matters

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 

project (sec. 2611)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2611) that would 

modify the authority provided by section 2603 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B 

of Public Law 112-239) and authorize the Secretary of the Navy 

to make certain modifications to the scope of a previously 
284

authorized construction project.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2611).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects 

(sec. 2612)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2612) that would 

extend the authorizations for three fiscal year 2011 projects 

until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an act 

authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 

2015, whichever is later.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained two similar 

provisions (sec. 2612 and sec. 2613) that would extend the 

fiscal year 2011 authorization for two projects until October 1, 

2014, or the date of the enactment of an act authorizing funds 

for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is 

later.

The agreement includes the House provision.

TITLE XXVII–BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 

ACTIVITIES

Summary

The Department of Defense requested $451.4 million for the 

ongoing cost of environmental remediation and other activities 

necessary to continue implementation of the 1988, 1991, 1993, 

1995, and 2005 Base Realignment and Closure rounds. The 

agreement includes the requested amount.

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations

Authorization of appropriations for Base Realignment and Closure 

activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure 

Account (sec. 2701)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2701) that would 

authorize appropriations for ongoing activities that are 

required to implement the decision of base realignment and 

closure activities.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2701).

The agreement includes the House provision.
285

Subtitle B—Other Matters

Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and 

Closure (BRAC) round (sec. 2711)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2711) that would 

prohibit funds, appropriated pursuant to an authorization of 

appropriations contained in this Act, to be used to propose, 

plan for, or execute an additional Base Realignment and Closure 

(BRAC) round.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 2702) that would establish, as a precondition for the 

authorization of a future BRAC round, a requirement for the 

Department of Defense to submit to Congress a formal review of 

overseas military facility structure.

The agreement includes a provision that would make clear 

that nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize a 

future BRAC round.

We note that the agreement also reduces the budget request 

by $8.0 million in Operation and Maintenance, defense-wide 

requested by the Department to "develop recommendations and 

manage a new BRAC round.”

Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding 

availability of military health care in National Capital Region 

(sec. 2712)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2712) that would 

repeal a quarterly reporting requirement regarding the capacity 

of the military health care system in the National Capital 

Region.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing 

initiative (sec. 2713)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 2703) that would require the Deputy Under Secretary of 

Defense for Installations and Environment to submit a report to 

the congressional defense committees on the 2005 BRAC joint 

basing initiative.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment.
286

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Consideration of the value of services provided by a local 

community to the Armed Forces as part of the economic analysis 

in making base realignment or closure decisions

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2713) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to include an accounting of the 

value of services that are provided by the local community to 

the military as part of the economic analysis conducted in 

making any base realignment or closure decision.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We believe that to the extent services provided by a local 

community directly reduce the cost of Department of Defense 

operations at a particular installation, such savings should be 

included in the evaluation of the fiscal consequences of 

proposed base closures and realignments under sections 993 and 

2687 of title 10, United States Code. We note that sections 993 

and 2687 of title 10, United States Code, apply to the 

Department’s authorities to carry out base closures and 

realignments below certain thresholds, not a formal base 

realignment and closure process which would have to be 

specifically authorized by Congress.

TITLE XXVIII–MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL 

PROVISIONS

Subtitle A–Military Construction Program 

and Military Family Housing Changes

Modification and extension of authority to utilize unspecified 

minor military construction authority for laboratory 

revitalization projects (sec. 2801)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2801) that would 

modify section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, and allow 

the threshold of the unspecified minor construction (UMMC) 

project to be adjusted based on area cost factors and modify 

several unspecified minor military construction thresholds.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would modify the UMMC threshold for the use of 
287

Operation and Maintenance funds for laboratory revitalization 

projects from $2.0 million to $4.0 million and extend the 

underlying authority from 2016 to 2018. The agreement does not 

include any other changes to UMMC thresholds or area cost factor 

adjustments.

We note that, historically, the Department of Defense 

laboratory enterprise has not received adequate attention with 

regard to the revitalization of its infrastructure. Given that 

the laboratory enterprise is crucial to the development of 

future technologies that provide our warfighters a decisive 

technological edge on the battlefield, we strongly encourage the 

Department to place a higher priority on the revitalization and 

modernization of infrastructure across the laboratory 

enterprise.

Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships 

with private developers of housing (sec. 2802)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2803) that would 

repeal the limited authority of the Department of Defense to 

enter into partnerships with private developers for the purpose 

of providing family housing construction. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Military construction standards to improve force protection 

(sec. 2803)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2804) that would 

provide additional latitude to the Department of Defense (DOD) 

to apply local threat criteria in the design and construction of 

DOD facilities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit 

a report to the congressional defense committees on current 

expeditionary physical barrier systems and new technologies that 

can be used for force protection and to provide blast 

protection.

Application of cash payments received for utilities and services 

(sec. 2804)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2805) that would 

authorize the secretaries of the military departments, beginning 
288

fiscal year 2014, to credit cash payments received as 

compensation for utilities or services provided to eligible 

entities that operate family or military unaccompanied housing 

projects to the appropriation or working capital account 

currently available for the purpose of furnishing such utilities 

or services. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2812).

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military 

housing investment authority (sec. 2805)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2806) that would 

repeal a notification required by section 2875 of title 10, 

United States Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Additional element for annual report on military housing 

privatization projects (sec. 2806)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2807) that would 

provide additional oversight and accountability in the pursuit 

of military family housing privatization projects to include an 

assessment of litigation costs that are being pursued by the 

privatization partners. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Policies and requirements regarding overseas military 

construction and closure and realignment of United States 

military installations in foreign countries (sec. 2807)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 2801) that would require all future military construction 

projects funded using in-kind payments pursuant to bilateral 

agreements with partner nations be submitted for congressional 

authorization in the Military Construction Authorization Act. 

The provision would also require that DOD include operational 

expenses funded through residual value payments in-kind in the 

budget justification documents submitted to Congress in 

connection with the annual budget request.
289

The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 2811) 

that would repeal section 2921 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101-510) and 

consolidate the requirements of overseas basing notification 

process in section 2687a of title 10, United States Code. This 

section would also remove a redundant reporting requirement 

associated with the proposed residual value of foreign military 

closure determinations.

The agreement includes a provision that would combine the 

two provisions and make other clarifying and technical 

modifications to sections 2802 and 2867a of title 10, United 

States Code, relating to overseas basing.

Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to 

use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in 

certain areas outside the United States (sec. 2808)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2808) that would 

amend section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136) and 

extend the Department of Defense’s ability to use operation and 

maintenance appropriations for military construction purposes in 

the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) area of 

responsibility (AOR) and certain countries in the United States 

United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) AOR until September 30, 

2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2802) that would extend the authority and revise 

the list of countries in the AFRICOM AOR in which the authority 

may be used.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Additionally, we note that the process by which the 

Department of Defense receives an authorization from Congress 

for military construction projects required to support overseas 

contingency operations can be cumbersome and extend over a long 

period of time. We also note that the fast pace of contingency 

operations, changes in the number of military forces in theater, 

and the contributions of partner countries may result in a 

change to or elimination of a military construction requirement 

in the time between the request to Congress for an authorization 

and the actual award of a construction contract. In order to 

ensure that funds are not expended on projects that no longer 

satisfy a valid military requirement, we believe the Secretary 

of Defense should review the process by which contracts for 

military construction projects overseas in connection with a 

contingency operation, as defined in section 101(a)(13) of title 
290

10, United States Code, are awarded and how such projects are 

carried out. This review should be conducted with the objective 

of developing a methodology to ensure that any changes in 

military requirements are taken into account when making 

decisions to construct, or continue constructing, a project.

Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of 

responsibility (sec. 2809)

The Senate committee-reported bill decreased authorization 

of appropriations from the budget request for military 

construction by $463.3 million for certain new military 

construction and family housing projects in the U.S. European 

Command (EUCOM) area of responsibility.

The House bill contained no similar funding cuts.

The agreement contains authorization of appropriations of 

$463.3 million for the projects in EUCOM and includes a new 

provision that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense or a 

Secretary of a military department from awarding a contract for 

any new military construction and family housing project, with 

certain exceptions, in the EUCOM area of responsibility until 

the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense 

committees that the installations and specific military 

construction requirements authorized in this Act have been 

examined as part of the ongoing European Infrastructure 

Consolidation Assessment, have been determined to be of an 

enduring nature, and most effectively meet military requirements 

at the authorized location.

Subtitle B–Real Property and Facilities 

Administration

Development of master plans for major military installations 

(sec. 2811)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2809) that would 

require the consideration of additional elements as part of 

master plans for major military installations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative 

expenses associated with real property leases and easements 

(sec. 2812)
291

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 2811) that would amend section 2667 of title 10, United 

States Code, to allow for the use of proceeds from leases and 

easements to be used to offset administrative costs incurred by 

the military departments in entering into and managing such 

leases and easements.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts for 

receipt of utility services as consideration for utility systems 

conveyances (sec. 2813)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 2813) that would amend section 2688(d)(2) of title 10, 

United States Code, by requiring the Secretary of a military 

department, prior to conveying a utility system under this 

section, to obtain an independent estimate of the level of 

investment that should be required to maintain adequate 

operation of the utility system over the term of the conveyance.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real 

property (sec. 2814)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2809) that would 

require a report on the utilization of real property across the 

Department of Defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Piñon Canyon 

Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado (sec. 2815)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2813) that would 

place conditions on the expansion of the Piñon Canyon Maneuver 

Site in Fort Carson, Colorado.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.
292

Subtitle C–Provisions Related to AsiaPacific Military Realignment

Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for 

period covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination 

Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment (sec. 2821)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2831) that would 

modify the reporting period for the annual Guam realignment 

report from calendar year to fiscal year. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2822).

The agreement includes the House provision.

Realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region (sec. 

2822)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2832) that would 

repeal section 2832 of the Military Construction Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 2821) that would extend the prohibition on funds for 

construction activities to implement the realignment of Marine 

Corps forces from Okinawa, Japan, with certain exceptions.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would modify the conditions that must be met 

before funds may be obligated to implement the realignment of 

Marine Corps forces, provide specific exceptions for the use of 

U.S. and Japanese funds, and direct the Secretary of Defense, as 

chairperson of the Economic Adjustment Committee (EAC), to 

convene the EAC to consider assistance necessary to support the 

preferred alternative for the relocation of Marine Corps forces 

to Guam.

We note that the agreement includes $85.7 million for an 

Aircraft Maintenance Hangar for the Marine Corps at Andersen Air 

Force Base and provides a specific exception for the use of 

Japanese funds to carry out the construction of a utility and 

site improvement project based on assurances from the Navy that 

both projects have military value independent of the movement of 

Marines from Okinawa to Guam. Specifically, the construction 

description of the Aircraft Maintenance Hangar indicates the 

project “supports an enduring support requirement for 1st MAW 

[Marine Aircraft Wing] squadrons that frequently deploy to Guam 

for training as part of the bilateral "Aviation Training 

Relocation" (ATR) agreement.” With regard to the Japanese-
293

funded utility and site improvement project on the North ramp of 

Andersen Air Force Base, the Principal Deputy Assistant 

Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations, and Environment 

indicated in an October 28, 2013, letter that the “project 

supports current and future training requirements that will 

increase the operational readiness of units in the Pacific 

Command Area of Responsibility consistent with the Combatant 

Commander’s theater objectives and requirements while 

depressurizing training airspace in Japan.”

We note that the draft Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement for the siting of a cantonment area and training range 

to support the 4,700 Marines to be stationed or deployed to Guam 

on a rotational basis should be released in early 2014. As 

such, we strongly encourage the Department to complete, as 

quickly as possible, the master plan for Guam, including 

detailed descriptions of scope, cost estimates, and timing for 

each military construction project needed to support the 

relocation of Marines to Guam so that Congress will be able to 

assess the affordability, feasibility, and strategic value of 

the plan. Until then, we believe it is important to ensure that 

any funds provided by the Governments of Japan or the United 

States are spent on new facilities that will satisfy valid 

military requirements. We believe this approach mitigates the 

risk of approving the construction of facilities that have not 

yet been justified within the context of a master plan or for 

which an Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision 

have not been rendered.

Subtitle D–Land Conveyances

Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California 

(sec. 2831)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2841) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Navy to acquire 300 units of 

military family housing constructed under section 801 of the 

Military Construction Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-115) at Naval 

Base Ventura County, California. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 2814). 

The agreement includes the House provision.

Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County, 

California (sec. 2832)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2842) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey, without 
294

consideration, the Oxnard Air Force Base at Ventura, California, 

the Ventura County for public purposes. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would ensure that any revenue resulting from the 

conveyance be used only for public airport purposes and provide 

for the reversion of such property to the Navy if it is 

determined it is not being used in accordance with the 

conveyance.

Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii (sec. 

2833)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 2831) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to 

convey approximately 11 acres of Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, 

Hawaii, to the Hale Keiki School in return for a cash payment, 

in-kind consideration, or a combination thereof, in an amount 

that is not less than the fair market value of the conveyed 

property. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision.

Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania (sec. 2834)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2843) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey certain properties 

and improvements at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, 

Pennsylvania, to the Philadelphia Regional Port Authority for 

fair market value. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah (sec. 2835)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2844) that would 

require the Secretary of the Interior to transfer 420 acres to 

the State of Utah for the purpose of permitting the Utah 

National Guard to use the conveyed land for military use. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.
295

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would make the conveyance permissive and make 

other clarifying changes.

Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch 

Mountains, Utah (sec. 2836)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2845) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to convey, without 

consideration, certain Air National Guard facilities at Francis 

Peak, Utah, for purposes of permitting the State of Utah to use 

the structures to support emergency public safety 

communications.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers, 

Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania (sec. 2837)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2847) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Army to convey, without 

consideration, to Derry Township, Pennsylvania, certain 

properties for the purpose of permitting the Township to use 

these properties for public purposes. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to 

convey other properties supporting former Army Reserve Centers.

Subtitle E–Other Matters

Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting 

requirement (sec. 2841)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2861) that would 

repeal an annual Economic Adjustment Committee report required 

by section 4004 of the Defense Economic Adjustment, 

Diversification, and Stabilization Act of 1990 (division D of 

Public Law 101-510). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

Establishment of military divers memorial (sec. 2842)
296

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2866) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Navy to permit a third party to 

establish and maintain at the former Navy Dive School at the 

Washington Navy Yard a memorial to honor divers in the United 

States Armed Forces. Federal funds may not be used to design, 

procure, prepare, install, or maintain the memorial. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Repeal of requirements for local comparability of room patterns 

and floor areas for military family housing and submission of 

net floor area information

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2802) that would 

repeal section 2826 of title 10, United States Code, that 

required the Secretary concerned to acquire military family 

housing that is comparable in structure to family housing 

available in the local community. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Department of Defense report on Military Housing Privatization 

Initiative

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2807A) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to issue a report to 

Congress on the Military Housing Privatization Initiative, 

including the details of any project where the project owner has 

outstanding local, county, city, town, or state tax obligations 

dating back over 12 months. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Continuation of limitation on use of funds for Leadership in 

Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold or platinum 

certification

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2821) that would 

continue the prohibition on the use of funds for Leadership in 

Energy and Environmental Design gold or platinum certifications 
297

for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We commend the Department for formalizing its new 

sustainable design criteria and policy governing investments in 

energy and water efficiency initiatives. As a result of the new 

policy, we expect all such investments going forward will be

underpinned by a cost-benefit analysis and reflective of local 

conditions. We believe that such an approach is critical to 

ensuring the cost-effective use of taxpayer dollars, especially 

in light of current budgetary pressures.

Land conveyance, former Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2846) that would 

require the Secretary of the Army to convey certain properties 

at Fort Monroe, Virginia, to the Commonwealth of Virginia. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

We note that the Fort Monroe Authority has completed a 

reuse plan and is preparing an Economic Development Conveyance 

for consideration by the Secretary of the Army. We expect that 

continued active dialogue between both parties will result in a 

compromise for the timely conveyance of the remaining parcels at 

Fort Monroe to the Fort Monroe Authority.

Naming Provisions

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2862) that would 

name the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies at Honolulu, 

Hawaii, as the “Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for 

Security Studies” and make other conforming changes. The House 

bill also contained a provision (sec. 2863) that would rename 

the Graduate School of Nursing at the Uniformed Services 

University of the Health Sciences, as the “Daniel K. Inouye 

Graduate School of Nursing” and make other conforming changes. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision that would name the Asia-Pacific Center for Security 

Studies at Honolulu, Hawaii, as the “Daniel K. Inouye AsiaPacific Center for Security Studies” and make other conforming 

changes (sec. 2841).

The agreement does not include these provisions.

We believe the naming of facilities, infrastructure, and/or 

programs is appropriately accomplished under existing Department 

of Defense (DOD) policies and procedures, including the request 
298

for legislative action, when necessary. We believe the naming 

of appropriate facilities, infrastructure, and/or programs would 

be a fitting tribute to the late Senator Daniel K. Inouye and 

would look favorably upon a request from DOD for legislative 

action to that effect, if required.

Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National 

Historical Park, Ohio

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2864) that would 

modify the name of the John W. Berry, Sr. Wright Brothers 

Aviation Center to the John W. Berry, Sr. Wright Brothers 

National Museum, Dayton, Ohio. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial in 

Riverside, California

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2865) that would 

authorize a memorial to members of the Armed Forces who have 

been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross. The memorial is 

located at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California, and 

would hereby be designated as the Distinguished Flying Cross 

National Memorial. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Inclusion of emblems of belief as part of military memorials

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2867) that would 

amend chapter 21 of title 36, United States Code, allowing 

emblems of belief to be included in military memorials. Emblems 

of belief include all emblems authorized by the National 

Cemetery Administration. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 2832) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to 

sell or exchange the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in San Diego, 

California, to an eligible entity on the condition that it 

continues to be maintained as a veterans’ memorial.

The agreement does not include these provisions.
299

TITLE XXIX-WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND 

TRANSFER OF PUBLIC LANDS TO SUPPORT 

MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY

Short title (sec. 2901)

The agreement includes a provision that would designate 

title XXIX of this Act as the “Military Land Withdrawals Act of 

2013.”

Definitions (sec. 2902)

The agreement includes a provision that would provide 

definitions for title XXIX of this Act.

Subtitle A-General Provisions

General applicability; definitions (sec. 2911)

The agreement includes a provision that would provide for 

the applicability and rules of construction of title XXIX of 

this Act.

Maps and legal descriptions (sec. 2912)

The agreement includes a provision that would provide for 

the preparation of maps, legal descriptions, and other processes 

related to lands covered by this title.

Access restrictions (sec. 2913)

The agreement includes a provision that would provide 

authority for the Secretary concerned to impose certain 

restrictions on access to lands withdrawn and reserved by this 

title if required for military operations, public safety, or 

national security.

Changes in use (sec. 2914)

The agreement includes a provision that would provide 

authority for the Secretary concerned to authorize additional 

defense-related purposes for land withdrawn and reserved by this 

title.

Brush and range fire prevention and suppression (sec. 2915)
300

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3009) that would 

require the Secretary of the Army to take necessary precautions 

to prevent, and actions to suppress, brush and range fires 

occurring as a result of military activities on the lands 

withdrawn by section 3001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary concerned to take necessary precautions to prevent, 

and actions to suppress, brush and range fires occurring as a 

result of military activities on land withdrawn and reserved by 

this title.

Ongoing decontamination (sec. 2916)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3010) that would 

require the Secretary of the Army to maintain a program of 

decontamination on the withdrawn land provided by section 3001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary concerned to maintain, to the extent funds are 

available for such purposes, a program of decontamination of 

contamination caused by defense-related uses of land withdrawn 

and reserved by this title.

Water rights (sec. 2917)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3008) that would 

retain water rights in existence prior to the withdrawal 

authorized in section 3001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would make clear 

nothing in this title establishes a new reservation of the 

United States with respect to any water or water right on land 

withdrawn and reserved by this title or affects any water rights 

acquired or reserved by the United States before the date of 

enactment of this Act.

Hunting, fishing, and trapping (sec. 2918)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3007) that would 

require hunting, fishing and trapping on the lands withdrawn in 

section 3001 to be conducted in accordance with section 2671 of 

title 10, United States Code. 
301

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would apply section 

2671 of title 10, United States Code, to land withdrawn and 

reserved by this title.

Limitation on extensions and renewals (sec. 2919)

The agreement includes a provision that would require 

withdrawals and reservations established under this title to be 

extended or renewed only through a law enacted after the date of 

enactment of this Act.

Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation (sec. 

2920) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3011) that would 

require the Secretary of the Army, not later than 5 years before 

the termination of the withdrawal and reservation, to notify the 

Secretary of the Interior of a continuing defense-related need 

after the termination date for any land withdrawn and reserved 

by section 3011. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary concerned, not later than 5 years before the 

termination of the withdrawal and reservation, to notify the 

Secretary of the Interior of a continuing defense-related need 

after the termination date for any land withdrawn and reserved 

by this title.

Limitation on subsequent availability of land for appropriation 

(sec. 2921)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3012) that would 

withdraw the lands transferred in section 3001 from all forms of 

appropriation under public land laws. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that prohibits 

previously withdrawn and reserved land from being open to any 

form of appropriation under the public land laws unless the 

Secretary of the Interior publishes an appropriate order in the 

Federal Register.

Relinquishment (sec. 2922)
302

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3013) that would 

provide authority and procedures for the Secretary of the Army 

to relinquish any or all of the lands withdrawn or reserved 

authorized in section 3001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that provides a process 

for the Secretary concerned to relinquish land withdrawn and 

reserved by this title.

Immunity of the United States (sec. 2923)

The agreement includes a provision that would provide that 

the United States and its officers or employees shall be held 

harmless and shall not be liable for any injuries or damages to 

persons or property as a result of nondefense-related activities 

conducted on land withdrawn and reserved by this title.

Subtitle B-Limestone Hills Training Area, 

Montana

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2931)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3001) that would 

withdraw the lands described at Limestone Hills Training Area, 

Montana, for use by the Department of the Army.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would provide for 

the withdrawal and reservation of public lands for Limestone 

Hills Training Area, Montana.

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2932)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3002) that would 

require the Secretary of the Army to manage the lands withdrawn 

in section 3001 in accordance with the limitations and 

restrictions of section 3003.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Special rules governing minerals management (sec. 2933)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3003) that would 
303

establish additional rules governing mineral management at 

Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Grazing (sec. 2934)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3004) that would 

require the Secretary of the Interior to continue and manage 

grazing permits and leases. The Secretary of the Interior, with 

the agreement of the Secretary of the Army, may delegate such 

authority to the Secretary of the Army. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Payments in lieu of taxes (sec. 2935)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3006) that would 

authorize the lands withdrawn in section 3001 to remain 

entitlement land under section 6901 of title 31, United States 

Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would deem land 

withdrawn by section 2931 to be entitlement land for purposes of 

section 6901 of title 31, United States Code.

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2936)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3005) that would 

terminate the land withdrawal authorized in this subtitle on 

March 31, 2039. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Subtitle C-Marine Corps Air Ground Combat 

Center Twentynine Palms, California

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2941)
304

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3052) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide for the 

Secretary of the Navy’s use of the Johnson Valley National OffHighway Vehicle Recreation Area twice in each calendar year for 

up to a total of 60 days per year for certain purposes. Any 

agreement for the military use of the Johnson Valley National 

Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area shall terminate not later 

than March 31, 2039.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains a provision that would provide for 

the withdrawal and reservation of public land for the Marine 

Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California.

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2942)

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of the Navy to manage the land withdrawn by section 

2941.

Public access (sec. 2943)

The agreement includes a provision that would prohibit 

public access to the Exclusive Military Use Area unless 

otherwise authorized by the Secretary of the Navy.

Resource management group (sec. 2944)

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretaries of the Interior and the Navy to establish a Resource 

Management Group for the land withdrawn and reserved by section 

2941.

Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area (sec. 2945)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3051) that would 

designate certain lands administered by the Secretary of the 

Interior in San Bernardino County, California, as the “Johnson 

Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.” This 

section would further withdraw the lands designated in this 

section from all forms of appropriation under public land laws.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2946)
305

The agreement includes a provision that would terminate the 

withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 2941 

on March 31, 2039.

Subtitle D-White Sands Missile Range, New 

Mexico, and Fort Bliss, Texas

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2951)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3021) that would 

transfer the administrative jurisdiction of certain lands 

located in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, from the Secretary of 

the Interior to the Secretary of the Army. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes a provision that would provide for 

the withdrawal of public land for White Sands Missile Range, New 

Mexico.

Grazing (sec. 2952)

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretary of the Interior to continue and manage grazing permits 

and leases. The Secretary of the Interior, with the agreement 

of the Secretary of the Army, may delegate such authority to the 

Secretary of the Army.

Subtitle E-Chocolate Mountain Aerial 

Gunnery Range, California

Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land (sec. 

2961)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3041) that would 

transfer the administrative jurisdiction of certain lands 

located in Imperial and Riverside Counties, California, from the 

Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of the Navy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Management and use of transferred land (sec. 2962)
306

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3042) that would 

authorize the Secretary of the Navy to use the lands transferred 

in section 3041 for military purposes. This section would also 

limit any diminution of these lands as critical habitat for the 

desert tortoise. Finally, this section would withdraw the lands 

transferred in section 3041 from all forms of appropriation 

under public land laws so long as the lands remain under the 

administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Effect of termination of military use (sec. 2963)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3044) that would 

require that if the Secretary of the Navy determines that there 

is no longer a military need for the lands transferred by 

section 3041, the Secretary of the Navy shall assess the level 

of contamination and determine, in consultation with the 

Secretary of the Interior, whether decontamination is practical 

and economically feasible. If the Secretary of the Navy 

determines that decontamination is practical, the Secretary of 

the Navy shall provide funds for such decontamination.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period (sec. 2964)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3045) that would 

find that notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 806 of the 

California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflight Act of 1994 

(title VIII of Public Law 103-433), the withdrawal and 

reservation of land transferred under section 3041 shall not 

terminate until the date on which the land transfer required by 

section 3041 is executed.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Water rights (sec. 2965)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3046) that would 

retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of 
307

administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3041.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment.

Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title 

(sec. 2966)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3043) that would 

authorize the realignment of the range boundary to ensure that 

the northwestern boundary of the Chocolate Mountain Aerial 

Gunnery Range shall be realigned to the edge of the Bradshaw 

trail so that the trail remains entirely under the jurisdiction 

of the Department of the Interior. The National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) shall not apply to 

any transfer provided by this section.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement contains the House provision with a 

clarifying amendment. We note that the redrawn range boundary 

would include approximately 200 acres formerly acquired through 

the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) or donation. It is 

our intent that the Secretary of the Navy transfer to the 

Secretary of the Interior acreage at least equal to the lands 

formerly acquired through the LWCF or donation.

Subtitle F-Naval Air Weapons Station China 

Lake, California

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2971)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3031) that would 

transfer the administrative jurisdiction of certain lands 

located in Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, California, 

from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of the Navy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes provisions that would provide for 

the withdrawal and reservation of public land for Naval Air 

Weapons Station China Lake, California.

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2972)
308

The agreement includes a provision that would provide for 

the management of withdrawn and reserved land for Naval Air 

Weapons Station China Lake, California.

Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of the Navy 

(sec. 2973)

The agreement includes a provision that would allow the 

Secretary of the Interior to assign management responsibility 

for withdrawn and reserved land for Naval Air Weapons Station 

China Lake, California, to the Secretary of the Navy.

Geothermal resources (sec. 2974)

The agreement includes a provision that would make clear 

that nothing in this subtitle affects geothermal leases issued 

by the Secretary of the Interior before the date of enactment of 

this Act or the responsibility of the Secretary of the Interior 

to manage and administer such leases. The provision would also 

clarify other authorities and responsibilities of the Secretary 

of the Navy with regard to geothermal exploration and 

development.

Wild horses and burros (sec. 2975)

The agreement includes a provision that would make the 

Secretary of the Navy responsible for the management of wild 

horses and burros on land withdrawn and reserved by section 

2971.

Continuation of existing agreement (sec. 2976)

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

agreement between the Secretaries of the Interior and the Navy 

under section 805 of the California Military Lands Withdrawal 

and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-433) to continue 

until the earlier of a new agreement being reached or 1 year 

after the date of enactment of this Act.

Management plans (sec. 2977)

The agreement includes a provision that would require the 

Secretaries of the Interior and the Navy to update and maintain 

cooperative arrangements concerning land resources and land uses 

on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971.

Termination of prior withdrawals (sec. 2978)
309

The agreement includes a provision that would terminate the 

prior withdrawal and reservation of land under section 803(a) of 

the California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 

1994 (Public Law 103-433).

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2979)

The agreement includes a provision that would terminate the 

withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 2971 

on March 31, 2039.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Water rights

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3022) that would 

retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of 

administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3021. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Withdrawal

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3023) that would 

withdraw the lands transferred in section 3021 from all forms of 

appropriation under public land laws so long as the lands remain 

under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 

Army. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Water rights

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3032) that would 

retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of 

administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3031. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Withdrawal

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3033) that would 

withdraw the lands transferred in section 3031 from all forms of 
310

appropriation under public land laws so long as the lands remain 

under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 

Navy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Southern Study Area, 

Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, 

California 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3053) that would 

transfer certain lands in San Bernardino County, California, as 

generally depicted as the “Southern Study Area,” to be 

transferred from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary 

of the Navy for military purposes.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Water rights

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3054) that would 

retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of 

administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3051. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.
311

DIVISION C–DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS 

AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE XXXI–DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL 

SECURITY PROGRAMS

Overview

Title XXXI authorizes appropriations for atomic energy 

defense activities of the Department of Energy for fiscal year

2014, including: the purchase, construction, and acquisition of 

plant and capital equipment; research and development; nuclear 

weapons activities; nuclear nonproliferation activities; naval 

nuclear propulsion; environmental cleanup; operating expenses; 

and other expenses necessary to carry out the purposes of the 

Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95–91). This 

title authorizes appropriations in five categories: (1) National 

Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); (2) Defense 

environmental cleanup; (3) Other defense activities; (4) Defense 

nuclear waste disposal; and (5) Energy security and assurance.

National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3101) that would 

authorize $11.8 billion for the National Nuclear Security 

Administration (NNSA), an increase of $212.0 million above the 

budget request. The Senate committee-reported bill contained a 

similar provision (sec. 3101) that would authorize $11.5 billion 

for the NNSA, an increase of $80.0 million above the budget 

request.

We agree to include a provision that would authorize $11.7 

billion, an increase of $72.8 million above the budget request. 

Within NNSA, the provision would authorize $7.9 billion for 

weapons activities, an increase of $40.8 million above the 

budget request; $2.2 billion for defense nuclear 

nonproliferation, an increase of $40.0 million above the budget 

request; $1.2 billion for naval reactors, the amount of the 

budget request; and $387.7 million for the Office of the 

Administrator, a decrease of $8.0 million below the budget 

request.

Within weapons activities, for directed stockpile work the 

provision would authorize $2.5 billion, an increase of $39.2 

million above the budget request. For campaigns, the provision 
312

would authorize $1.7 billion, the amount of the budget request. 

For nuclear programs, the provision would authorize $744.5 

million, the amount of the budget request.

Within defense nuclear nonproliferation, for 

nonproliferation and verification research and development the 

provision would authorize $388.8 million, the amount of the 

budget request. For nonproliferation and international 

security, the provision would authorize $141.7 million, the 

amount of the budget request. For international nuclear 

materials protection and cooperation, the provision would 

authorize $369.6 million, the amount of the budget request. For 

fissile materials disposition, the provision would authorize 

$542.6 million, $40.0 million above the amount of the budget 

request. For the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, the 

provision would authorize $424.5 million, the amount of the 

budget request.

Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3102) that would 

authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 defense 

environmental cleanup activities at $4.9 billion.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 3102) that authorized appropriations at $5.0 

billion.

We agree to include a provision that would authorize 

appropriations at $5.0 billion.

Other defense activities (sec. 3103)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3103) that would 

authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 other defense 

activities at $749.1 million.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar

provision (sec. 3103) that authorized appropriations at $749.1 

million.

We agree to include a provision that would authorize 

appropriations at $758.7 million, $9.6 million above the budget 

request.

Budget Item

Project 99-D-143, mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility

The House bill proposed funding the mixed oxide (MOX) fuel 

fabrication facility at the fiscal year 2014 request of $320 

million.

The Senate committee-reported bill proposed funding the 

project at $80.0 million above the fiscal year budget 2014 
313

request as a way to stabilize the program at the fiscal year 

2013 levels while a strategic review is being conducted.

We agree to fund the construction project at $360.0 

million, $40.0 million above the fiscal year 2014 budget 

request. We note that this project has been fraught with cost 

overruns and program delays. In fiscal year 2012, a decision 

was made to cancel the feedstock facility, which was to reduce 

old pits from nuclear weapons into feedstock for the MOX fuel 

plant, at a cost of some $730.0 million being spent in designing 

the facility. The MOX fuel plant and related support facilities 

has risen from an initial cost estimate of $1.0 billion to $7.7 

billion, and it is projected to be at least 3 years late in its 

initial operation in 2020. The Government Accountability Office 

estimates, through fiscal year 2036, that the total life cycle 

cost will exceed $24.2 billion, including actual costs of $5.2 

billion for prior years (fiscal year 1999 to fiscal year 2012). 

Despite years of outreach to the nuclear industry, there is 

currently no agreement with any utility to use the MOX fuel and 

it is not yet clear whether commercial nuclear power plants will 

even accept the MOX fuel at market rates or whether the 

Department of Energy will have to subsidize, at taxpayers’ 

expense, the sale of the fuel to make it competitive with 

commercially produced low-enriched uranium. 

We believe the rising costs associated with the program, 

canceled facilities, missed deadlines, and questionable ability 

to produce fuel at market prices are unacceptable. We caution 

that further cost increases would undermine the feasibility and 

affordability of the program. We understand the Department is 

now undertaking a strategic review of the program and other 

alternatives. We expect to be fully briefed on this strategic 

review, including the new cost estimates and projected 

construction timeline, and what actions the Department is taking 

or will take to reign in the program costs and, if necessary, 

consider less costly alternatives for disposing of the plutonium 

from retire nuclear weapons. If the Department of Energy 

considers any future increases to the MOX facility, we expect 

those proposed increases to come from outside of budget function 

050, which funds the Nation’s critical national security 

priorities. We believe the Department must make its national 

security activities its top priority in budgeting, and expect 

that critical National Nuclear Security Administration programs 

should not become the source of funds for future increases to 

the MOX program.

Subtitle A–National Security Programs 

Authorizations
314

National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3101) that would 

authorize appropriations for the National Nuclear Security 

Administration for fiscal year 2014, including funds for weapons 

activities, defense nuclear nonproliferation programs, naval 

reactor programs, and the Office of the Administrator, at the 

levels identified in section 4701 of division D of this Act. 

This section would also authorize several new plant projects for 

the National Nuclear Security Administration.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3102) 

authorizing appropriations for the Department of Energy for 

fiscal year 2014 for defense environmental cleanup activities as 

specified in the funding table in section 4701.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 3102).

The agreement includes this provision.

Other defense activities (sec. 3103)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3103) 

authorizing appropriations for the Department of Energy for 

fiscal year 2014 for other defense activities as specified in 

the funding table in section 4701.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 3103).

The agreement includes this provision.

Subtitle B-Program Authorizations, 

Restrictions, and Limitations

Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security 

Administration (sec. 3111)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3111) that would 

amend section 3211 of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401) to clarify the set of 

principles with which the National Nuclear Security 

Administration must carry out its operations and activities. 
315

Specifically, this section would add the requirement that all 

operations and activities of the Administration be conducted 

consistent with the principle of “ensuring the security of the 

nuclear weapons, nuclear material, and classified information in 

the custody of the Administration.”

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear 

Security Administration (sec. 3112)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3113) that would 

amend section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2537) to require that any independent cost estimate carried out 

pursuant to section 4217 be conducted by the Secretary of 

Defense, acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and 

Program Evaluation (CAPE). The Director would be authorized to 

delegate carrying out such cost estimates to other elements of 

the Department of Defense. This section would also provide the 

Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Administrator for 

Nuclear Security and acting through the Director of CAPE, the 

authority to conduct an independent cost assessment of any 

initiative or program of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration (NNSA) that is estimated to cost more than $500.0 

million.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3111) that would amend the National Nuclear Security 

Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et. Seq.) to establish an 

Office of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation within NNSA 

whose director would be Senate-confirmed. The Senate committeereported bill also contained a provision (sec. 3118) that would 

require any cost estimates submitted pursuant to section 4217 of 

the Atomic Energy Defense Act be submitted in unclassified form, 

with a classified annex if necessary. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that changes the Director of the new office from a 

Senate-confirmed position to a Senior Executive Service 

position. The amendment eliminates the requirement for two 

deputy directors, and modifies several of the responsibilities 

and authorities of the Director, and would require a joint 

implementation plan for the new office to be submitted by the 

NNSA Administrator and the Director of DOD’s CAPE.

Given the size of the NNSA’s Office of the Administrator of 

approximately 1,800 personnel, we believe that requiring the 

Director to be a Senior Executive Service officer is adequate to 

ensure seniority and credibility within the NNSA. Further, we 
316

believe that the joint NNSA-DOD implementation plan will be 

important to standing up this new office. We expect the DOD 

CAPE to play an active role in not only training personnel of 

the new NNSA office, but helping shape and ensure quality cost 

estimates and program evaluations during the early years of the 

new NNSA office. We understand that the work for cost 

estimation at the NNSA will have periods between major projects 

where the personnel from this office can assist the DOD CAPE on

subject matter unique to the NNSA that is not present in the DOD 

CAPE office. We encourage as a matter of good government such 

collaboration.

The credibility of the NNSA with Congress and other 

agencies of the Executive Branch has been hurt by high-profile 

failures in cost estimation and program evaluation. We expect 

the NNSA to embrace this new Cost Estimation and Program 

Evaluation office as a means to help regain its credibility.

Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk (sec. 

3113)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3115) that would 

provide the Secretary of Energy, given the critical national 

security function of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration and the Department’s Office of Intelligence 

functions, with the authority to take certain actions with 

regard to the protection of the supply chain of the Department 

of Energy (DOE). This authority would replicate the authority 

provided to the Department of Defense in section 806 of the Ike 

Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(Public Law 111–383) and to the intelligence community in 

section 309 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (Public Law 112–87).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment containing technical changes. The amendment includes 

a sunset of the authority 4 years after the date of enactment, a 

notice to the appropriate committees within 7 days after a 

supply chain source exclusion determination is made, and a 

review on an annual basis (for 4 years) by the Comptroller 

General on the implementation of this section by the Department 

of Energy, including on the adequacy of resources available to 

perform supply chain source exclusion determinations.

We note this authority is intended to be used when existing 

supply chain management authorities are not sufficient to 

protect the national security of the United States. Use of this 

authority by DOE is expected to be limited in frequency. We 
317

encourage DOE to partner with supply chain sources, to the 

extent practicable, to implement this authority.

Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear 

Security Administration (sec. 3114)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3116) that would 

limit the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 

otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the National 

Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) such that $139.5 million 

may not be obligated or expended until the Administrator for 

Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees 

a detailed plan to achieve certain planned efficiencies and 

written certification that the planned efficiencies will be 

achieved. If the Administrator does not submit the plan or is 

unable to certify within 60 days of the date of the enactment of 

this Act that the efficiencies will be achieved, the 

Administrator would be required to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees on the amount of planned 

efficiencies that will not be realized and any effects caused by 

planned but unrealized efficiencies in the Directed Stockpile 

Work and Nuclear Programs accounts. The limitation of funds for 

NNSA would not apply to funds authorized to be appropriated for 

Directed Stockpile Work, Nuclear Programs, or Naval Reactors, 

and should not result in reductions in Laboratory Directed 

Research and Development funding. Finally, the limitation on 

obligation of funds would not affect the authority of the 

Secretary of Energy to reprogram or transfer funding under 

sections 4702, 4705, and 4711 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 2751).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that provides a rule of construction that the funds 

limitation shall not be considered a specific denial of funds 

relative to the authorities associated with subsection (d)(2). 

The amendment also provides that the amount of funds limited by 

this section would be reduced by the amount the Administrator is 

able to certify has been saved through the planned efficiencies.

Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the 

Administrator for Nuclear Security (sec. 3115)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3117) that would 

limit the availability of funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 

the National Nuclear Security Administration's Office of the 
318

Administrator to not more than 75 percent until several 

statutorily required reports are submitted to Congress in 2013 

and 2014.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment containing technical and clarifying changes.

Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, 

Response, and Testing (sec. 3116)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3119) that would 

require the Administrator for Nuclear Security to establish a 

Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Testing, and Response 

within the nuclear security enterprise. The Center would be 

responsible for a range of activities, but would primarily serve 

to provide the Administrator, the Chief of Defense Nuclear 

Security, and the management and operating contractors of the 

nuclear security enterprise, a wide range of objective expertise 

on security technologies, systems, analysis, testing, and 

response forces.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would modify the name of the organization to the 

Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response, and Testing 

(CSTART) and authorize the Administrator to provide additional 

duties to the center.

Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to 

the replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy 

Research Building, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico 

(sec. 3117)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3116) that would extend section 3144(c) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–

239) to permit consideration of a modular building strategy for 

engineering and design if it meets long term stockpile 

requirements. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would change the notice and wait requirement from 

30 to 60 days. The amendment would also add to the notification 

required by the Nuclear Weapons Council to the congressional 

defense committees such that it includes notification that the 

modular strategy: (1) meets requirements for implementation of a 
319

responsive infrastructure, including meeting plutonium pit 

production requirements; and (2) will achieve full operating 

capability for not less than two modular structures by not later 

than 2027. 

We are aware that further detail on requirements and plans 

for the modular approach are being developed and refined. We 

expect the Nuclear Weapons Council to keep Congress informed as 

the modular approach is developed and implemented to meet 

requirements for pit production and a responsive infrastructure. 

Furthermore, we encourage the Administrator for Nuclear Security 

and the Nuclear Weapons Council to expeditiously carry out such 

efforts to both ensure construction of a responsive nuclear 

infrastructure and to enable a timely transition of nuclear 

operations out of decaying and increasingly unsafe facilities 

such as the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building. 

Finally, we note the reprogramming action concerning unobligated 

funds for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement 

Nuclear Facility is still pending, and look forward to working 

with the Nuclear Weapons Council to resolve the deferred 

reprogramming proposal. 

Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options (sec. 

3118)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3121) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, 

acting through the Nuclear Weapons Council, to include several 

warhead life extension options through all of Phase 6.2 and all 

of Phase 6.2A of the Joint W78/88–1 Warhead Life Extension 

Program. The options are the W78-1 life extension and the W88-1 

life extension.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 1043) that would require the Director of Cost 

Analysis and Program Evaluation to conduct a similar analysis of 

alternatives for the Joint W78/88–1 Warhead Life Extension 

Program.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that none of the funds may be obligated or expended 

for phase 6.3 of the combined W78/88-1 warhead until the 90 days 

after the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council submits a 

comparative analysis of the alternative options of life 

extending the W78-1 and the W88-1 systems individually, so as to 

compare to the cost to the combined W78/88-1 warhead system.

We encourage the Administrator to leverage, for the 

purposes of this section, the NNSA Director for Cost Estimating 

and Program Evaluation created elsewhere in this Act, and, 

during the transition period when the capabilities of such 
320

Director are being stood up, to work jointly with the Department 

of Defense Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.

Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into 

transactions to carry out certain research projects (sec. 3119)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3123) that would 

extend section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy 

Organization Act (P.L. 95-91, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 

7256(g)(10)), from September 30, 2015 to September 30, 2020.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Increase in construction design threshold (sec. 3120)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3117) that would increase the major capital construction 

design threshold for the National Nuclear Security 

Administration from $600,000 to $1.2 million to account for 

increased construction costs.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would increase the capital construction design 

threshold to $1.0 million.

Subtitle C-Plans and Reports

Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic 

energy defense facilities (sec. 3121)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3131) that would 

amend section 4506 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act to require 

that, not later than September 30 of each year, the 

Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration 

(NNSA) submit to the Secretary of Energy and to the 

congressional defense committees, a report detailing and 

certifying the status of the security of the nuclear security 

enterprise, including the status of the security of special 

nuclear material, nuclear weapons, and classified information at 

each nuclear weapons production facility and national security 

laboratory. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar 

provision (sec. 3113) that would require the Secretary of Energy 

to certify the that atomic energy defense facilities of the 

Department of Energy containing quantities of category I and II 

special nuclear material meet Department security requirements.
321

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Administrator to certify to the 

Secretary of Energy that the NNSA facilities containing 

quantities of Category I and II special nuclear material meet 

NNSA and Department of Energy security standards and 

requirements and for those that do not, actions and timelines to 

correct any deficiency. The Secretary would be required to 

transmit this certification to the congressional defense 

committees with any comments of the Secretary by December 1 of 

each year. The amendment also requires the Secretary to certify 

to the congressional defense committees by December 1 each year 

that atomic energy defense facilities other than those of the 

NNSA containing quantities of category I and II special nuclear 

materials shall meet Department security standards and 

requirements and for those facilities that do not to develop a 

correction action plan with timelines to correct any deficiency.

Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the 

nuclear weapons stockpile (sec. 3122)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3132) that would 

amend section 4205 of the Atomic Energy Defense

Act (50 U.S.C. 2525) to clarify requirements related to the

statutorily required annual assessments regarding the condition 

of the nuclear weapons stockpile. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would modify the date that such assessments are 

due from the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy to 

the President to February 1 of each year. The amendment would 

also require that, if the report containing such assessments is 

not be received by the Congress by March 15, the covered 

officials under section 4205(b) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2525(b)) shall provide a briefing to the 

congressional defense committees to ensure information regarding 

the status of the stockpile is available to inform congressional 

oversight and provide timely input to the annual legislative 

cycle.

Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons 

stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan (sec. 

3123)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3115) that would amend the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 

U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) to provide for a long-term plutonium 
322

strategy for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) 

as part of its Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan. 

Plutonium sustainment is at the core of the NNSA stockpile 

mission. This integrated plan would ensure the NNSA remains 

focused on its plutonium mission.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would eliminate the external review and 

incorporate the requirement for an integrated plutonium strategy 

into section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2523).

Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of 

management and operating contracts (sec. 3124)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3120) that would 

amend section 3121 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to clarify that, if a 

management and operating contract awarded by the Administrator 

for Nuclear Security is protested, the report required by such 

section to be submitted to Congress shall be submitted not later 

than 30 days after such protest is resolved. This section would 

also require any report under section 3121 to include a 

description of the assumptions used and analysis conducted to 

determine cost savings expected from the competition of the 

contract and exempt contracts for managing and operating 

facilities of the Naval Reactors Program from the requirements 

of section 3121.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3122) that would amend section 3121(e) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-

239) to reduce the number of reports by the Government 

Accountability Office (GAO).

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that combines the two provisions, changes the existing 

90-day reporting requirement for the GAO to 180 days, and 

provides flexibility to ensure the reporting requirements for 

both the National Nuclear Security Administration and the GAO do 

not interfere with any award protests.

Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to 

program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation (sec. 

3125)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3123) that would amend section 3122(e) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-
323

239) to require a 30-day notice for extending the program on 

scientific engagement for non-proliferation to a new country. 

The provision gives the Administrator of the National Nuclear 

Security Administration a national security waiver of the 

requirement as long as there is a report filed within 30 days.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would add the Comptroller General to the program 

commencement report with its analysis by the Comptroller General 

due no later than 18 months after receipt of the report.

Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium 

capabilities replacement project (sec. 3126)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3124) that would amend section 3123(f) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (P.L. 112-239) to 

change the Government Accountability Office reporting 

requirement from the end of project life to 1 year after the 

date of enactment in consultation with the congressional defense 

committees.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation (sec. 

3127)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3114) that would 

require the Secretary of Energy to submit a comprehensive plan 

through 2025 to the congressional defense committees by March 1, 

2014, for the safe and effective retrieval, treatment, and 

disposition of nuclear waste contained in the tank farms of the 

Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Richland, Washington.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would require the Secretary of Energy to submit a 

plan for tank farm waste at Hanford, including the activities 

necessary to start operations at the Waste Treatment and 

Immobilization Plant (WTP) and activities necessary to design, 

construct, and operate the WTP and any related infrastructure 

facilities. The amendment would require the Secretary to 

identify any significant requirements needed to inform such 

activities and require the Secretary to determine whether such 

requirements are finalized. The Secretary would be authorized 

to change any such significant requirements that are determined 

to be finalized, but would require prompt congressional 
324

notification of such changes if they have significant material 

effect on the schedule or cost of the project. The plan would 

be required to be submitted to the congressional defense 

committees by June 1, 2014.

Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of 

nuclear security enterprise (sec. 3128)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3112) that would require the Administrator of the National 

Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to develop a plan for a 

common cost structure between activities at different sites with 

the purpose of comparing how efficiently different sites within 

the NNSA complex are carrying out similar activities.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require the Administrator to submit a plan 

for improving and integrating financial management of the 

nuclear security enterprise to the congressional defense 

committees not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 

this Act.

We direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

review the plan submitted by the Administrator and brief the 

congressional defense committees within 60 days of submission of 

such plan by the Administrator on the adequacy of this plan in 

meeting the objectives set forth in this section and offer 

recommendations for improvement.

Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such 

computing into the stockpile stewardship program (sec. 3129)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3114) that would add a new section to the Atomic Energy 

Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) requiring the Administrator 

for Nuclear Security to develop and carry out a plan to 

incorporate exascale computing in the stockpile stewardship 

program. Such plan would be required to cover the 20-year 

period after the date of enactment of this Act, and would be 

submitted to the congressional defense committees annually. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment that would require the plan to include information on 

developing exascale computing, alter the timeframe for the plan 

to 10 years after enactment of this Act, and require inclusion 

of milestones to be achieved to mitigate disruptions resulting 

from the transition to exascale computing. The amendment would 

also require that the Future-Years Nuclear Security Program, 
325

report submitted pursuant to section 3253 of the National 

Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Act (50 U.S.C. 2453), 

include a description of the costs borne by the NNSA, the 

Department of Energy’s Office of Science, other federal 

agencies, and industry to develop exascale computing. Finally, 

the amendment would eliminate the requirement for annual 

reporting on advances outside the United States in exascale 

computing and require that the plan required by this section be 

submitted with each summary of the Stockpile Stewardship and 

Management Plan submitted to the congressional defense 

committees in each even-numbered year pursuant to section 4203 

of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523).

We understand the value of maintaining U.S. leadership in 

high performance computing and believe achieving exascale 

computing within the next decade must be a national goal. 

However, we note that NNSA’s top priority must remain 

sustainment and modernization of the nuclear weapons stockpile. 

High performance computing is an important capability that 

underpins these efforts via the stockpile stewardship program, 

but the costs of achieving exascale computing must not be borne 

by NNSA alone. Due to the broad benefits exascale would bring 

to the Federal Government and the U.S. economy in general, we

encourage the Administrator to partner with and leverage other 

stakeholders in government and industry.

Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program principles 

(sec. 3130)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3122) that would 

make a series of findings related to a pilot program conducted 

by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) at the 

Kansas City Plant (KCP) starting in April 2006, and would 

require the Administrator for Nuclear Security to extend

the principles of such pilot program. The Administrator would 

be required to implement the principles of the pilot program 

permanently at the Kansas City Plant and extend the principles 

of the pilot program, with modifications as the Administrator 

determines appropriate, to not less than two additional 

facilities of the nuclear security enterprise within 1 year 

after the date of the enactment of this Act.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment requiring a study of the feasibility of extending the 

Kansas City Plant pilot program to other National Nuclear 

Security Administration (NNSA) sites with a report to Congress 

within 180 days after enactment on the results of the study and 
326

a determination of whether the principles will be extended. We 

do not mandate extending the principles. We also note the ongoing work by Comptroller General of the United States to assess 

the risks, benefits and applicability of extending the pilot 

program to other facilities. 

Given the success of the pilot program at the Kansas City 

Plant, we direct the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the 

Secretary of Energy to ensure, to the greatest extent possible, 

that these principles are permanently implemented at the Kansas 

City Plant.

Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries (sec. 

3131)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3142) that would 

require the Administrator for Nuclear Security, not later than 

60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, to conduct 

a study of the potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Repeal of certain reporting requirements (sec. 3132)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3133) that would 

repeal two statutes requiring submission of annual, recurring 

reports: (1) a report on Counterintelligence and Security 

Practices at National Laboratories required by section 4507 of 

the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2658); and (2) a report 

on Advanced Supercomputer Sales to Certain Foreign Nations 

contained in section 3157 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment containing technical corrections.

Subtitle D-Other Matters

Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy (sec. 3141)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3143) that would 

clarify that the amendment made by section 3113 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-

239) to section 4102 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2512) may not be construed to affect the authority of the 

Secretary of Energy, in carrying out national security programs, 
327

with respect to the management, planning, and oversight of the 

National Nuclear Security Administration, or as affecting the 

delegation by the Secretary of Energy of authority to carry out 

such activities, as set forth under subsection (a) of section 

4102, as it existed before the amendment made by section 3113. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment.

Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on 

the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise (sec. 3142)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3141) that would 

amend section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239) to modify statutory 

deadlines regarding the Congressional Advisory Panel on the 

Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise. The advisory 

panel's interim report would be due by October 1, 2013, instead 

of 180 days after enactment of Public Law 112-239. Also, the 

advisory panel's full report would be due March 1, 2014, instead 

of February 1, 2014. Finally, the advisory panel would 

terminate not later than September 30, 2014, instead of June 1, 

2014. This section would also enable the advisory panel to 

submit a final report on its activities and recommendations 

prior to termination. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3125) that would amend section 3166(d)(1) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-

239) to extend the date of the interim report from 180 days 

after the date of enactment to 180 days after the first meeting 

of the advisory panel.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would change the interim report due date to March 

1, 2014 with the full report due by July 1, 2014. 

Department of Energy land conveyance (sec. 3143)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3146) that 

would convey in fee simple, excess land from the Hanford 

Reservation to the Hanford Community Re-Use Organization.

The Senate committee-passed bill had no similar provision.

The agreement includes a provision authorizing the 

transfer of the Bannister Federal Complex, Kansas City 

Missouri, from the General Services Administration to the 

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which may 
328

convey for consideration the real property using existing 

Department of Energy regulations.

We request monthly reports on the status of the 

conveyance of Hanford land to the Hanford Community Re-Use 

Organization.

In addition, we request a monthly report on the status 

of conveying the land at the Hanford reservation to the 

Hanford Community Re-Use Organization.

Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (sec. 3144)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3144) that would 

make a technical amendment to chapter 10 of the Atomic Energy 

Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.).

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security 

Administration Act (sec. 3145)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3131) that would amend the National Nuclear Security 

Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et. seq.) with technical and 

clarifying corrections.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act (sec. 

3146)

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3132) that would amend the Atomic Energy Defense Act (42 

U.S.C. 2501 et. seq.) with technical and clarifying corrections. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an 

amendment containing technical and conforming changes.

Sense of Congress on B61-12 life extension program (sec. 3147)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3118) that would 

express the sense of Congress that, particularly in a 

constrained budget environment, the National Nuclear

Security Administration (NNSA) should prioritize its primary 

mission of sustaining and modernizing the nuclear weapons 

stockpile and, if required, shift funding from secondary 

missions to ensure critical nuclear weapons modernization 
329

programs stay on schedule and deliver nuclear warheads needed to 

support military requirements. This section would also require 

that, of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 

otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Global 

Threat Reduction Initiative of the NNSA, not more than 80 

percent may be obligated or expended unless, by not later than 

60 days after the date of enactment, the NNSA Administrator 

certifies to the congressional defense committees that the B61 

Life Extension Program will deliver a first production unit in 

fiscal year 2019.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision with an 

amendment that would express a sense of Congress that the B61-12 

Life Extension Program is a high priority of the NNSA; that, if 

necessary to avoid delays, funds should be shifted from other 

programs to ensure the B61-12 Life Extension Program stays on 

schedule; and that further delays to the program would undermine 

the credibility and reliability of the nation’s nuclear 

deterrent and the extended deterrent provided by the United 

States to allies.

Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on toxic 

substances and worker health (sec. 3148)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1027) that would 

express the sense of Congress that the President should 

establish an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker 

Health as part of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Program.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted

Energy security and assurance 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3104) that would 

authorize appropriations for energy security and assurance 

programs for fiscal year 2014, at the levels identified in 

section 4701 of division D of this Act.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision as both 

budget tables in section 4701 authorized no funding for the 

program.
330

Termination of Department of Energy Employees to Protect 

National Security 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3112) that would 

authorize the Secretary of Energy to terminate an employee of 

the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) or any 

element of the Department of Energy (DOE) that involves nuclear 

security if the Secretary determines the employee acted in a 

manner that endangers the security of special nuclear material 

or classified information. To exercise such authority, the 

Secretary would have to consider the termination to be in the 

interests of the United States and determine that the 

termination procedures prescribed by other provisions of law 

cannot be invoked in a manner that the Secretary considers 

consistent with national security.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

We understand that, following the July 2012 security breach 

at the Y-12 National Security Complex by several anti-nuclear 

activists, including an octogenarian nun, several federal 

employees were reassigned or allowed to retire. However, no 

federal employees have been terminated from federal service. We 

find this lack of robust accountability to be unacceptable and 

dangerous. Multiple reviews since the incident have found 

failures at every level contributed to this incident, and that 

there has been a distinct failure to take corrective actions 

identified by previous security incidents. 

For example, senior leaders in the Department of Energy’s 

Office of Health, Safety, and Security have held top security 

policy and oversight positions for well over a decade despite 

repeated security failures during this tenure. These same 

senior leaders are now inexplicably being counted on to 

implement reforms. This is despite the fact that this same 

office conducted a review of Y-12’s physical security systems 

just 2 months prior to the July 2012 break-in and gave Y-12’s 

security a clean bill of health. This lack of accountability, 

whether at senior levels or throughout the DOE, is outrageous 

and must not be tolerated. 

It is also contrary to the strong leadership and 

accountability example set by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates 

in 2008 when he fired several top Air Force officials for 

significant and repeated nuclear weapon security failures. 

Unlike DOE, Secretary Gates sent a strong message to the Air 

Force that continuation of the failures would not be tolerated 

and officials at all levels were accountable for failure. 
331

Senior officials from the Department of Energy have indicated 

that federal employment laws and regulations prevented or 

severely impeded termination of any federal employees in 

response to the Y-12 incident. If true, we believe the 

inability of the Secretary of Energy to fire federal employees 

for major security failures would represent a critical problem 

and national security risk. Therefore, we direct the Secretary 

of Energy to submit a report to the congressional defense 

committees by March 15, 2014, on the authorities available to 

the Secretary to terminate federal employees. Such report 

should include a description of the authorities available and 

describe in detail why such authorities were insufficient to 

terminate employees in the aftermath of the Y-12 incident. The 

report should also include a list of the officials in the DOE 

and NNSA structure that had responsibility for security at Y-12 

in July 2012, a description of any disciplinary actions taken 

with respect to such officials, and such officials’ current 

positions. Finally, the report should also provide a 

description of the Secretary’s views on accountability for 

security failures, whether actions taken in response to the Y-12 

incident conform to these views, and how these views will be 

applied in the future.

Assessment of nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National 

Nuclear Security Administration 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3121) that would require the National Nuclear Security 

Administration to undergo a review of their nuclear 

nonproliferation programs by the National Academies of Science. 

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The agreement does not include this provision. 

The Comptroller General of the United States is directed to 

provide a report to the congressional defense committees 

assessing the existing and future nuclear nonproliferation 

programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration. The 

report shall include the following elements: 

(1) An assessment of the threat of nuclear 

proliferation, including fissile materials, technology and 

expertise related to nuclear weapons, plutonium 

reprocessing and uranium enrichment.

(2) The status of nuclear nonproliferation programs of 

the National Nuclear Security Administration as of the date 

of the enactment of this Act.

(3) An assessment of whether those programs are 

meeting the goals of those programs and reducing the 

assessed threat of nuclear proliferation including: 
332

Preventing nuclear terrorism by securing and removing 

highly-enriched uranium and plutonium worldwide; converting 

research reactors from highly-enriched uranium to lowenriched uranium in Russia and other countries; providing 

radiation detection capability at ports and borders; 

securing and removing radiological materials worldwide; 

developing and improving technology to detect nuclear 

proliferation and nuclear weapons detonation, to verify 

foreign commitments to treaties and agreements with respect 

to nuclear weapons, and detect the diversion of materials, 

including safeguards technology; and preventing and 

countering the proliferation and use of nuclear weapons 

(including materials, technology and expertise).

(4) The extent of the work remaining for those 

programs to meet those goals, including an estimated 

timeline and costs and what gaps remain in those goals.

(5) The nuclear nonproliferation programs of the 

National Nuclear Security Administration and nuclear 

cooperation agreements with countries that have obtained 

nuclear weapons and are not parties to the Treaty on the 

Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at Washington, 

London, and Moscow July 1, 1968, and entered into force 

March 5, 1970 (21 UST 483) (commonly known as the "Nuclear 

Non-Proliferation Treaty").

(6) The nuclear nonproliferation programs of the 

National Nuclear Security Administration and nuclear 

cooperation agreements with countries that are non-nuclear 

weapon state parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation 

Treaty and are acquiring nuclear materials in violation of 

commitments under the Treaty.

(7) The status, level of, and gaps related to, 

coordination of the programs of the NNSA and the Department 

of Energy with other agencies and departments of the 

Federal Government that have nuclear nonproliferation 

responsibilities.

(8) In addition, the report shall include an 

assessment of the budget requirements of the NNSA, 

including the costs associated with the implementation of 

nuclear nonproliferation programs, to reduce the threat of 

nuclear proliferation.

We are cognizant that this report may require a significant 

effort by the Government Accountability Office. The Comptroller 

General of the United States shall provide quarterly updates on 

the status of the report with a final report due no later than 

August 31, 2015.

Government Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Extension 
333

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3145) that would 

permit government owned non-defense transuranic waste to be 

disposed of in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant subject to 

meeting the waste acceptance criteria outlined in “Transuranic 

Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant,” 

dated April 21, 2011, published by the Department of Energy.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

Manhattan Project National Historic Park 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3147) that would 

establish as a unit of the National Park System a series of 

historical sites associated with the Manhattan Project at 

facilities administered by the Department of Energy.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement does not include this provision.

TITLE XXXII-DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES 

SAFETY BOARD

Authorization (sec. 3201)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3201) that would 

authorize the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board at $29.915 

million.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Improvements to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3202) that would

amend section 315 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 

2286d) to enable the Secretary of Energy to request an analysis 

regarding the costs and benefits of any draft or final 

recommendation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 

(DNFSB). If the Secretary requests such an analysis, the Board 

would be required to transmit such an analysis to the Department 

of Energy (DOE) within 30 days and make such analysis public 

when the associated recommendation is made available to the 
334

public. Additionally, if the Secretary requests such an 

analysis from the Board, the Secretary would be required to 

conduct a similar analysis of the costs and benefits of the 

recommendation and make such analysis available to the public. 

The provision would also amend section 312 of the Atomic Energy 

Act of 1954 (U.S.C. 2286a) to clarify that, in making 

recommendations to the Secretary of Energy, the Board must use 

rigorous, quantitative analysis and specifically assess the use 

of various administrative, passive, and engineered controls for 

implementing the recommended measures.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that a variety of independent assessments in recent 

years have indicated that DNFSB oversight, coupled with DOE’s 

history of not challenging DNFSB recommendations, have 

contributed to increasing costs within the nuclear security 

enterprise that may achieve comparatively small safety benefits. 

For instance, a 2011 study of two major DOE defense nuclear 

facility construction projects by the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD AT&L) found that 

“the current process involving oversight by the DNFSB is not 

working well. Differing interpretations of DOE regulations 

between the DNFSB, and the DOE and its contractors have diverted 

attention and resources for arguably increased safety.” The 

study found that, “in certain cases, the DOE has failed to ‘push 

back’ on DNFSB recommendations that don’t cost-effectively buy 

down risk, creating conditions in which the DFNSB becomes a de 

facto program manager.” The USD AT&L report and the 2009 report 

of the bipartisan Commission on the Strategic Posture of the 

United States ultimately recommended eliminating DNFSB oversight 

in favor of regulation of DOE facilities by the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission. 

In 2005, a report by the Secretary of Energy’s Advisory 

Board (SEAB) concluded that, although the DNFSB only issues 

recommendations and not requirements, “their recommendations 

have the implicit status of requirements because of the current 

lack of a specific mechanism for implementation assessment.” 

The SEAB emphasized that an analysis of the costs of 

implementation, safety benefits, and risks of an idea should 

drive every decision and recommendation made to and within the 

enterprise, and suggested the DNFSB use this mechanism every 

time they make recommendations. In its Phase I report on 

Managing for High Quality Science and Engineering at the 

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) laboratories, 

the National Academies of Science (NAS) concluded that “the role 

that non-regulatory agencies (particularly the DNFSB) have had 
335

on the laboratories is excessive. Although the Board lacks 

independent regulatory enforcement authority, it has issued more 

than 30 formal recommendations to the Secretary of Energy since 

1990.” In its Phase II report in 2013, the NAS pointed out that 

“the DNFSB is an advisory body that does not directly impose 

regulations, although DOE and NNSA usually accept DNFSB 

recommendations.” The 2013 report also stated that safety 

assessments by overlapping oversight bodies, including the 

DNFSB, “adds to the cost of conducting experiments and can slow 

or deter experimental work . . . Moreover, these assessments 

generally focus on the safety risks associated with particular 

experiments rather than weighing those risks against the 

benefits to be derived from the experiments and the risks to the 

nuclear weapons program from not conducting the experiments.” 

Most recently, in September 2013 an assessment of the safety 

culture at NNSA found a perception among NNSA employees that 

“NNSA leadership is very reactive to the DNFSB and will make 

sudden changes rather than question or say no to the Board.”

While we do not comment on individual cases or circumstances, we 

believe it is imperative that the Secretary of Energy assess the 

costs and benefits of any recommendation made by the DNFSB. We 

believe it is incumbent upon the Secretary to reject or request 

modifications to DNFSB recommendations if the costs of 

implementing the recommendations are not commensurate with the 

safety benefits gained. We note that existing statute provides 

the Secretary with this authority, and encourage the Secretary 

to use it, when appropriate. Risk acceptance, if considered 

carefully and transparently, is an important risk management 

practice.

TITLE XXXIV-NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 3401)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3401) that would 

authorize $20.0 million for fiscal year 2014 for the purpose of 

carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 10, United 

States Code, relating to the Naval Petroleum and Oil Reserves. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes the House provision.

TITLE XXXV-MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of 

the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014 (sec. 3501)
336

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3501) that would 

authorize appropriations for the Maritime Administration of the 

Department of Transportation for those activities of the 

Maritime Administration associated with maintaining national 

defense sealift.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program 

(sec. 3502)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3502) that would 

extend the sunset date on the authorization to issue war risk 

insurance from December 31, 2015, to December 31, 2020. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Sense of Congress (sec. 3503)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3503) that would 

express the sense of Congress on the importance of the United 

States shipbuilding industry and specifically the Ready Reserve 

Force of the Maritime Administration to the national security 

needs of the United States.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime

facility, Port of Anchorage, Alaska (sec. 3504)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3504) that would 

modify the current language requiring that any funds provided 

for the federal share, and any funds provided for the nonfederal share, for an intermodal transportation maritime 

facility at the Port of Anchorage, Alaska, must be transferred 

to the Administrator of the Maritime Administration. The 

provision would change current laws to a permission to transfer 

the funds, rather than a requirement to transfer the funds. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Strategic seaports (sec. 3505)
337

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3505) that would 

allow the Maritime Administrator, in consultation with the 

Secretary of Defense, to give priority to providing funding to 

strategic seaports in support of national security requirements.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar 

provision.

The agreement includes this provision.

Legislative Provision Not Adopted

Maritime Administration

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision 

(sec. 3501) that would re-authorize certain aspects of the 

Maritime Administration. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision.
338

DIVISION D–FUNDING TABLES

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 4001)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 4001) that would 

provide for the authorization of projects, programs, and 

activities in accordance with the tables in division D.

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical 

provision (sec. 4001).

The agreement includes this provision. 
2 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT. 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 

001 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT .......................................................................... 1 19,730 1 19,730 1 19,730 1 19,730 

003 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) ................................................ 4 142,050 4 142,050 4 142,050 –57,000 4 85,050 

Modification of 12 transferred Liberty A/C ................................. [114,700 ] Reduction of EMARSS LRIP aircraft ............................................ [–114,700 ] [–57,000 ] 

004 MQ–1 UAV ............................................................................................ 15 518,460 19 518,460 15 518,460 15 518,460 

005 RQ–11 (RAVEN) .................................................................................... 10,772 10,772 10,772 10,772 

ROTARY 

006 HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) ....................................................... 10 96,227 31 231,327 10 96,227 10 75,000 20 171,227 

Program increase for additional aircraft .................................... [21 ] [115,100 ] [10 ] [75,000 ] Program increase for fielding ..................................................... [20,000 ] 

007 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN ...................................................... 42 608,469 42 608,469 42 608,469 42 608,469 

008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 150,931 150,931 150,931 150,931 012 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) .................................................. 65 1,046,976 65 1,046,976 65 1,026,992 –14,061 65 1,032,915 

Transfer to PE 0203774A at Army request ................................. [–19,984 ] [–14,061 ] 

013 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 116,001 116,001 116,001 116,001 014 CH–47 HELICOPTER .............................................................................. 28 801,650 28 801,650 28 801,650 28 801,650 

015 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 98,376 98,376 98,376 98,376 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

016 MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS .......................................................................... 97,781 97,781 97,781 97,781 017 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) ....................................................................... 10,262 10,262 10,262 10,262 018 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) ....................................................... 12,467 12,467 12,467 12,467 019 AH–64 MODS ........................................................................................ 53,559 53,559 53,559 53,559 

020 CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) ............................................ 149,764 149,764 149,764 149,764 021 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS .......................................................... 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

022 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS .................................................................. 167 74,095 167 74,095 167 74,095 167 74,095 023 KIOWA MODS WARRIOR ........................................................................ 3 184,044 3 184,044 3 184,044 3 184,044 024 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN .............................................................. 152,569 152,569 152,569 152,569 025 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE ................................................................ 92,779 92,779 92,779 92,779 026 GATM ROLLUP ....................................................................................... 65,613 65,613 65,613 65,613 027 RQ–7 UAV MODS .................................................................................. 121,902 121,902 121,902 121,902 

GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 

028 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT .................................................. 47,610 47,610 47,610 47,610 029 SURVIVABILITY CM ................................................................................ 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 030 CMWS .................................................................................................... 126,869 126,869 126,869 126,869 

OTHER SUPPORT 

031 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 705 6,809 705 6,809 705 6,809 705 6,809 

032 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 65,397 65,397 65,397 65,397 033 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS .......................................................... 45,841 45,841 45,841 45,841 034 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .......................................................................... 79,692 79,692 79,692 79,692 035 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ......................................................................... 1,615 1,615 1,615 1,615 036 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET ..................................................................... 2,877 2,877 2,877 2,877 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................ 1,040 5,024,387 1,065 5,159,487 1,040 5,004,403 10 3,939 1,050 5,028,326 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 

002 MSE MISSILE ......................................................................................... 56 540,401 56 540,401 56 540,401 56 540,401 

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ...................................................................... 4,464 4,464 4,464 4,464 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

004 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY ................................................. 449 110,510 449 110,510 449 110,510 449 110,510 

005 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY .................................................................... 988 49,354 988 49,354 988 49,354 988 49,354 006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 19,965 19,965 19,965 19,965 007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) .......................................................... 1,788 237,216 1,788 237,216 1,788 237,216 1,788 237,216 008 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) .......................... 2,412 19,022 2,412 19,022 2,412 19,022 2,412 19,022 

MODIFICATIONS 

011 PATRIOT MODS ...................................................................................... 256,438 256,438 256,438 256,438 012 STINGER MODS ..................................................................................... 37,252 37,252 37,252 37,252 013 ITAS/TOW MODS .................................................................................... 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 014 MLRS MODS .......................................................................................... 11,571 11,571 11,571 11,571 015 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS ....................................................................... 6,105 6,105 6,105 6,105 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

016 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 11,222 11,222 11,222 11,222 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

017 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS ......................................................................... 3,530 3,530 3,530 3,530 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
4 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

018 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES) ................................................... 1,748 1,748 1,748 1,748 019 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT ............................................................... 5,285 5,285 5,285 5,285 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................... 5,693 1,334,083 5,693 1,334,083 5,693 1,334,083 5,693 1,334,083 

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 STRYKER VEHICLE ................................................................................ 374,100 374,100 374,100 374,100 

MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

002 STRYKER (MOD) .................................................................................... 20,522 20,522 20,522 20,522 

003 FIST VEHICLE (MOD) ............................................................................. 29,965 29,965 29,965 29,965 004 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) .................................................................. 158,000 158,000 158,000 158,000 005 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) ................................... 4,769 4,769 4,769 4,769 006 PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) .......................................... 18 260,177 18 260,177 18 219,477 –40,700 18 219,477 

Transfer to PE 0604854A at Army Request ................................ [–40,700 ] [–40,700 ] 

007 IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) ........................... 111,031 186,031 111,031 75,000 186,031 

Program increase ........................................................................ [75,000 ] [75,000 ] 

008 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) ....................................................................... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 009 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE .............................................................. 14 62,951 21 93,951 14 62,951 14 62,951 

Program increase ........................................................................ [7 ] [31,000 ] 

010 M88 FOV MODS .................................................................................... 28,469 28,469 28,469 28,469

011 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE ........................................................................ 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002 012 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) ..................................................................... 178,100 178,100 178,100 178,100 013 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM .............................................................. 168,000 90,000 90,000 

Program increase ........................................................................ [168,000 ] [90,000 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

014 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV) ........................................... 1,544 1,544 1,544 1,544 

WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 

015 INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY .............................. 1,424 69,147 8,147 –1424 –69,147 0 

Transfer to PE 0604601A per Army’s request ............................ [–11,000 ] [–11,000 ] XM25 Counter Defilade Target Engagement ............................... [–1,424 ] [–50,000 ] [–1,424 ] [–69,147 ] [–1,424 ] [–58,147 ] 

018 MORTAR SYSTEMS ................................................................................ 5,310 5,310 5,310 5,310 019 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) ...................................... 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049 021 CARBINE ............................................................................................... 41,897 70,846 41,897 48,846 12,000 21,254 –29897 –49,592 12,000 21,254 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
5 

Individual Carbine program cancelation .................................... [–22,000 ] [–29,897 ] [–49,592 ] [–29,897 ] [–49,592 ] 

023 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION ........................... 242 56,580 242 56,580 242 56,580 242 56,580 024 HANDGUN .............................................................................................. 300 300 300 300 

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 

026 M777 MODS .......................................................................................... 39,300 39,300 39,300 39,300 027 M4 CARBINE MODS .............................................................................. 10,300 10,300 10,300 10,300 028 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS ......................................................... 33,691 33,691 33,691 33,691 029 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS ......................................................... 7,608 7,608 7,608 7,608 030 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................... 2,719 2,719 2,719 2,719 031 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS ............................................................ 7,017 7,017 7,017 7,017 032 M119 MODIFICATIONS ........................................................................... 18,707 18,707 18,707 18,707 033 M16 RIFLE MODS .................................................................................. 2,136 2,136 2,136 2,136 034 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) ............................... 1,569 1,569 1,569 1,569 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

035 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) .............................................. 2,024 2,024 2,024 2,024 036 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) ........................................ 10,108 10,108 10,108 10,108 037 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ................................................................ 459 459 459 459 038 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) ................................. 1,267 1,267 1,267 1,267 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY .............................. 48,656 1,597,267 47,239 1,788,267 17,335 1,437,828 –31,321 5,561 17,335 1,602,828 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 112,167 87,167 87,167 –25,000 87,167 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ..................... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

003 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 58,571 53,571 53,571 –5,000 53,571 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ..................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 9,858 9,858 9,858 9,858 005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 80,037 55,037 55,037 –25,000 55,037 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ..................... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

007 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 16,496 16,496 6,196 –10,300 6,196 

Program decrease ........................................................................ [–10,300 ] [–10,300 ] 

008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 69,533 50,033 50,033 –19,500 50,033 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ..................... [–19,500 ] [–19,500 ] [–19,500 ] 

009 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 55,781 55,781 55,781 55,781 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 38,029 38,029 38,029 38,029 011 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 24,656 24,656 24,656 24,656 012 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ................................................................ 60,781 60,781 60,781 60,781 

TANK AMMUNITION 

013 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES ......................... 121,551 121,551 121,551 121,551 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
6 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES ....................... 39,825 39,825 39,825 39,825 015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ....................................... 37,902 37,902 37,902 37,902 016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 ................................................ 802 67,896 802 67,896 802 67,896 802 67,896 017 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL ......................... 71,205 71,205 71,205 71,205 

ROCKETS 

020 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................... 1,012 1,012 1,012 1,012 021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES ........................................................... 108,476 108,476 108,476 108,476 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................... 24,074 24,074 24,074 24,074 023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 33,242 33,242 33,242 33,242 024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 7,609 7,609 7,609 7,609 025 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 5,228 5,228 5,228 5,228 

MISCELLANEOUS 

026 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES ......................................................... 16,700 16,700 16,700 16,700 027 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES ................................................. 7,366 7,366 7,366 7,366 028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 3,614 3,614 3,614 3,614 029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) ............................................... 12,423 12,423 12,423 12,423 030 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT .................................................... 16,604 16,604 16,604 16,604 031 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) .................................... 14,328 14,328 14,328 14,328 032 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES .......................................................................... 108 108 108 108 

PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 

033 PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ................................................. 242,324 242,324 242,324 242,324 034 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION .................................... 179,605 179,605 179,605 179,605 035 ARMS INITIATIVE ................................................................................... 3,436 3,436 3,436 3,436 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY ..................... 802 1,540,437 802 1,465,937 802 1,455,637 –84,800 802 1,455,637 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 

001 TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS .......................................................... 25 4,000 25 4,000 25 4,000 25 4,000 002 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: ..................................................................... 40 6,841 40 6,841 40 6,841 40 6,841 

003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) .......................................... 837 223,910 837 223,910 837 223,910 837 223,910 004 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP ............................... 11,880 11,880 11,880 11,880 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
7 

005 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) .................................... 220 14,731 220 14,731 220 14,731 220 14,731 006 PLS ESP ................................................................................................ 74 44,252 74 44,252 74 44,252 74 44,252 009 HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV .......................... 77 39,525 77 39,525 77 39,525 77 39,525 011 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS .................................. 746 51,258 746 25,958 746 51,258 –25,300 746 25,958 

Funding ahead of need ............................................................... [–25,300 ] [–25,300 ] 

012 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP .......................................................... 34 49,904 34 49,904 34 49,904 34 49,904 

013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ........................ 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 

014 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN ...................................................................... 400 400 400 400 015 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 716 716 716 716 016 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER .......................................................... 5,619 5,619 5,619 5,619 

COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 

018 WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK ................................... 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477 019 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ..................................................... 14,120 14,120 14,120 14,120 020 JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY .......................... 7,869 7,869 7,869 7,869 021 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) ............................................................ 5,296 5,296 5,296 5,296 

COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

022 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS ......................... 31 147,212 31 147,212 31 147,212 31 147,212 023 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS .................. 7,998 7,998 7,998 7,998 024 SHF TERM ............................................................................................. 7,232 7,232 7,232 7,232 025 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) ................................ 3,308 3,308 3,308 3,308 026 SMART-T (SPACE) ................................................................................. 13,992 13,992 13,992 13,992028 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS ................................................................ 94 28,206 94 28,206 94 28,206 94 28,206 029 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) ........................................................ 15 2,778 15 2,778 15 2,778 15 2,778 

COMM—C3 SYSTEM 

031 ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) ................................... 17,590 17,590 17,590 17,590 

COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 

032 ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO) .............................. 786 786 786 786 033 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM ........................................................... 10,523 382,930 10,523 382,930 10,523 382,930 10,523 382,930 034 MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) ............................. 130 19,200 130 19,200 130 19,200 130 19,200 035 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) ..................................................... 1,438 1,438 1,438 1,438 036 SINCGARS FAMILY ................................................................................. 9,856 9,856 9,856 9,856 037 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA2 ............................................................... 2,066 14,184 2,066 14,184 2,066 14,184 2,066 14,184 038 TRACTOR DESK ..................................................................................... 6,271 6,271 6,271 6,271 040 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS ................... 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 041 TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM ..................... 15,967 31,868 15,967 31,868 15,967 31,868 15,967 31,868 042 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE .................................................................... 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 044 RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY .................................................. 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,166 045 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE ....................... 22,867 22,867 22,867 22,867 

COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
8 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

048 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE ........................................................... 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 049 ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT .......................................................... 323 61,096 323 61,096 323 61,096 323 61,096 

INFORMATION SECURITY 

050 TSEC—ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS) .................................................... 13,890 13,890 13,890 13,890 051 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP ............................... 1,133 23,245 1,133 23,245 1,133 23,245 1,133 23,245 052 BIOMETRICS ENTERPRISE ..................................................................... 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 053 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) .............................................. 877 24,711 877 24,711 877 24,711 877 24,711 

COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 

055 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS ....................................................... 43,395 43,395 43,395 43,395 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

057 INFORMATION SYSTEMS ........................................................................ 104,577 104,577 104,577 104,577 058 DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) ...................................................... 612 612 612 612 059 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ..................... 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 060 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM ....................... 248,477 248,477 248,477 248,477 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

064 JTT/CIBS-M ............................................................................................ 824 824 824 824 065 PROPHET GROUND ................................................................................ 10 59,198 10 59,198 10 59,198 10 59,198 

067 DCGS-A (MIP) ....................................................................................... 2,717 267,214 2,717 267,214 2,717 267,214 2,717 267,214 068 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) .......................................... 5 9,899 5 9,899 5 9,899 5 9,899 069 TROJAN (MIP) ........................................................................................ 24,598 24,598 24,598 24,598 070 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) ........................................... 1,927 1,927 1,927 1,927 071 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) ................................ 6,169 6,169 6,169 6,169 072 MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM-M .................... 2,924 2,924 2,924 2,924 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ............................................. 18 40,735 18 40,735 18 40,735 18 40,735 075 EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT) ................................. 13 13 13 13 076 ENEMY UAS ........................................................................................... 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES ...................... 1,237 1,237 1,237 1,237 080 CI MODERNIZATION ............................................................................... 1,399 1,399 1,399 1,399 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

082 SENTINEL MODS .................................................................................... 86 47,983 86 47,983 86 47,983 86 47,983 083 SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) ..................................................... 142 142 142 142 084 NIGHT VISION DEVICES ......................................................................... 6,879 202,428 6,879 202,428 6,879 202,428 6,879 202,428 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
9 

085 LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ................... 5,183 5,183 5,183 5,183 086 NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT ................................................... 14,074 14,074 14,074 14,074 087 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF ............................... 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300089 GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM (GLIS) ....................................... 1,016 1,016 1,016 1,016 090 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS ............................... 5 55,354 5 55,354 5 55,354 5 55,354 091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP ............................................................... 800 800 800 800 092 PROFILER .............................................................................................. 3,027 3,027 3,027 3,027 093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) .................................... 1,185 1,185 1,185 1,185 094 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) .................................... 3,866 103,214 3,866 103,214 3,866 103,214 3,866 103,214 096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) ............................................................. 167 26,037 167 26,037 167 26,037 167 26,037 097 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM ......................................................... 120 23,100 120 23,100 120 23,100 120 23,100 098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ......................................................................... 19 312,727 19 312,727 19 312,727 19 312,727 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 

101 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY .................................................................... 574 43,228 574 43,228 574 43,228 574 43,228 

102 BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM .......................... 167 14,446 167 14,446 167 14,446 167 14,446 103 FAAD C2 ................................................................................................ 4,607 4,607 4,607 4,607 104 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS ............................... 8 33,090 8 33,090 8 33,090 8 33,090 105 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM ........................................................ 21,200 21,200 21,200 21,200 107 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) ............................................. 1,795 1,795 1,795 1,795 109 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE ....................... 54,327 54,327 54,327 54,327 110 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ................................................... 2,959 59,171 2,959 59,171 2,959 59,171 2,959 59,171 111 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) .......................... 83,936 83,936 83,936 83,936 113 LOGISTICS AUTOMATION ....................................................................... 25,476 25,476 25,476 25,476 114 RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET ........................ 212 19,341 212 19,341 212 19,341 212 19,341 

ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 

115 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION ......................................................... 11,865 11,865 11,865 11,865 116 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP ................................................ 219,431 219,431 219,431 219,431 117 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM ....................... 6,414 6,414 6,414 6,414 118 HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) ....................................... 62,683 62,683 62,683 62,683 120 RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) ................................ 34,951 34,951 34,951 34,951 

ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) 

121 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V) ............................................................ 7,440 7,440 7,440 7,440 122 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) ............................... 16 1,615 16 1,615 16 1,615 16 1,615 

ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT 

123 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) ..................................................... 554 554 554 554 124 BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES ........................................................... 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

124A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 3,558 3,558 3,558 3,558 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 

126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ........................................ 762 762 762 762 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
10 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) ........................................................... 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630 128 CBRN DEFENSE ..................................................................................... 24,530 22,151 24,530 22,151 24,530 22,151 24,530 22,151 

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 

130 TACTICAL BRIDGING .............................................................................. 2 14,188 2 14,188 2 14,188 2 14,188 

131 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON ....................................................... 34 23,101 34 23,101 34 23,101 34 23,101132 COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP ................................... 15,416 15,416 15,416 15,416 

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 

134 GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) ........................... 311 50,465 311 50,465 311 50,465 311 50,465 135 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) ...................................... 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 136 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION ....................................... 1,563 1,563 1,563 1,563 137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) ...................... 6,774 20,921 6,774 20,921 6,774 20,921 6,774 20,921 138 REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS ............................................................ 100 100 100 100 139 < $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT ..................................................... 70 2,271 70 2,271 70 2,271 70 2,271 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

140 HEATERS AND ECU’S ............................................................................ 464 7,269 464 7,269 464 7,269 464 7,269 141 LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS AND LATRINES ................................................. 200 200 200 200 142 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT ....................................................................... 1,468 1,468 1,468 1,468 143 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) .............................. 31,530 26,526 31,530 26,526 31,530 26,526 31,530 26,526 144 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM ................................................................... 5,547 81,680 5,547 71,680 5,547 81,680 –10,000 5,547 71,680 

Unjustified unit cost growth ....................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 217 28,096 217 28,096 217 28,096 217 28,096 

148 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM .................... 6,904 56,150 6,904 56,150 6,904 56,150 6,904 56,150 149 MORTUARY AFFAIRS SYSTEMS .............................................................. 248 3,242 248 3,242 248 3,242 248 3,242 150 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS ........................ 289 38,141 289 38,141 289 38,141 289 38,141 151 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) ....................................................... 210 5,859 210 5,859 210 5,859 210 5,859

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 

152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER .................................. 508 60,612 508 60,612 508 60,612 508 60,612 

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

153 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL ................................................................. 3,258 22,042 3,258 22,042 3,258 22,042 3,258 22,042 

154 MEDEVAC MISSON EQUIPMENT PACKAGE (MEP) .................................. 88 35,318 88 35,318 88 35,318 88 35,318 

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 

155 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS ...................................... 25 19,427 25 19,427 25 19,427 25 19,427 156 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) .................................................. 347 3,860 347 3,860 347 3,860 347 3,860 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
11 

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 

157 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) ............................................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 159 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING ................................................................... 52 36,078 52 36,078 52 36,078 52 36,078 

160 MISSION MODULES—ENGINEERING ..................................................... 13 9,721 13 9,721 13 9,721 13 9,721 162 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR ....................................................................... 109 50,122 109 50,122 109 50,122 109 50,122 163 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED ..................................................................... 84 28,828 84 28,828 84 28,828 84 28,828 164 ALL TERRAIN CRANES ........................................................................... 19 19,863 19 19,863 19 19,863 19 19,863 166 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) ................................... 34 23,465 34 23,465 34 23,465 34 23,465 168 ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP ............................ 109 13,590 109 13,590 109 13,590 109 13,590 169 CONST EQUIP ESP ................................................................................ 80 16,088 80 16,088 80 16,088 80 16,088 170 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) ............................................ 66 6,850 66 6,850 66 6,850 66 6,850 

RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 

171 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP ....................................................................... 38,007 19,007 38,007 –19,000 19,007 

Funding ahead of need ............................................................... [–19,000 ] [–19,000 ] 

172 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) ................................................ 10,605 10,605 10,605 10,605 

GENERATORS 

173 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP ................................................ 5,239 129,437 5,239 129,437 5,239 129,437 5,239 129,437 

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

174 ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER (RTCH) ................................... 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 175 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS ........................................................................... 60 8,260 60 8,260 60 8,260 60 8,260 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

176 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT ................................................ 309 121,710 309 121,710 309 121,710 309 121,710 

177 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM .......................................................... 8,181 225,200 8,181 225,200 8,181 225,200 8,181 225,200 178 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER ..................................................... 15 30,063 15 30,063 15 30,063 15 30,063 179 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER ................................... 2 34,913 2 34,913 2 34,913 2 34,913 180 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING ..................... 9,955 9,955 9,955 9,955 

TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 

181 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 3 8,241 3 8,241 3 8,241 3 8,241 182 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) ................................ 1,810 67,506 1,810 67,506 1,810 67,506 1,810 67,506 183 TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) ........................................ 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755 

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

184 M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR ............................................................... 647 5,110 647 5,110 647 5,110 647 5,110 

185 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................... 5,110 5,110 5,110 5,110 186 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) ................................................. 62,904 62,904 62,904 62,904 187 BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 1,427 1,427 1,427 1,427 188 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) ................................... 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661 189 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) ..................................................... 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 190 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING ............................................ 69 11,593 69 11,593 69 11,593 69 11,593 191 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3 .................................................................. 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948 192 TRACTOR YARD ..................................................................................... 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
12 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

OPA2 

195 INITIAL SPARES—C&E .......................................................................... 15 59,700 15 59,700 15 59,700 15 59,700 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................................... 162,339 6,465,218 162,339 6,410,918 162,339 6,465,218 –54,300 162,339 6,410,918 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

001 EA–18G ................................................................................................. 21 2,001,787 21 1,956,787 21 2,001,787 –60,913 21 1,940,874 

Excess engineering change order funding .................................. [–8,790 ] 

GFE electronics cost growth ........................................................ [–5,943 ] Other GFE cost growth ................................................................ [–1,180 ] Program adjustment .................................................................... [–45,000 ] [–45,000 ] 

003 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET .............................................................. 206,551 206,551 206,551 206,551 004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 75,000 75,000 75,000 

Program increase ........................................................................ [75,000 ] [75,000 ] 

005 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV .................................................................... 4 1,135,444 4 1,135,444 4 1,135,444 4 1,135,444 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 94,766 94,766 94,766 94,766 007 JSF STOVL ............................................................................................. 6 1,267,260 6 1,267,260 6 1,267,260 6 1,267,260 008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 103,195 103,195 103,195 103,195 009 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) ............................................................................ 18 1,432,573 18 1,432,573 18 1,432,573 18 1,432,573 010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 55,196 55,196 55,196 55,196 011 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) .......................................................... 25 749,962 25 749,962 25 749,962 25 749,962 

012 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 71,000 71,000 71,000 71,000 013 MH–60S (MYP) ..................................................................................... 18 383,831 18 383,831 18 383,831 18 383,831 014 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 37,278 37,278 37,278 37,278 015 MH–60R (MYP) ..................................................................................... 19 599,237 20 599,237 19 599,237 19 599,237 016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 231,834 231,834 231,834 231,834 017 P–8A POSEIDON .................................................................................... 16 3,189,989 16 3,189,989 16 3,189,989 16 3,189,989 018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 313,160 313,160 313,160 313,160 019 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE ............................................................................. 5 997,107 5 962,107 5 997,107 5 997,107 

Unjustified CRI Funding .............................................................. [–35,000 ] 

020 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 266,542 266,542 266,542 266,542 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

021 JPATS .................................................................................................... 29 249,080 29 249,080 29 249,080 29 249,080 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
13 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

022 KC–130J ................................................................................................ 2 134,358 2 134,358 2 134,358 2 134,358 

023 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 32,288 32,288 32,288 32,288 025 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 52,002 52,002 52,002 –47,200 4,802 

Advance procurement appropriated in fiscal year 2013 ............ [–47,200 ] 

026 MQ–8 UAV ............................................................................................ 1 60,980 1 60,980 1 60,980 1 60,980 028 OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT .................................................................. 1 14,958 1 14,958 1 14,958 1 14,958

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

029 EA–6 SERIES ........................................................................................ 18,577 18,577 18,577 18,577 

030 AEA SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 48,502 48,502 48,502 48,502 031 AV–8 SERIES ........................................................................................ 41,575 41,575 41,575 41,575 032 ADVERSARY ........................................................................................... 2,992 2,992 2,992 2,992033 F–18 SERIES ......................................................................................... 875,371 875,371 875,371 –41,841 833,530 

ECP 6038 radome kits cost growth (OSIP 002–07) ................... [–2,952 ] 

Integrated logistics support growth (OSIP 14–03) ..................... [–8,000 ] Other support and ILS ahead of need (OSIP 04–14) ................. [–20,989 ] Retrofit radars (APG–79B) cost growth (OSIP 002–07) ............. [–9,900 ] 

034 H–46 SERIES ........................................................................................ 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 036 H–53 SERIES ........................................................................................ 67,675 67,675 67,675 67,675 037 SH–60 SERIES ...................................................................................... 135,054 135,054 135,054 135,054 038 H–1 SERIES .......................................................................................... 41,706 41,706 41,706 41,706 039 EP–3 SERIES ........................................................................................ 55,903 12 77,903 77,903 22,000 77,903 

12th aircraft to Spiral 3 ............................................................. [8,000 ] [8,000 ] [8,000 ] Sensor obsolescence .................................................................... [12 ] [14,000 ] [14,000 ] [14,000 ] 

040 P–3 SERIES .......................................................................................... 37,436 37,436 37,436 37,436 

041 E–2 SERIES .......................................................................................... 31,044 31,044 31,044 31,044 042 TRAINER A/C SERIES ............................................................................ 43,720 43,720 43,720 –3,200 40,520 

Avionics Obsolescence installation cost growth ......................... [–3,200 ] 

043 C–2A ..................................................................................................... 902 902 902 902 044 C–130 SERIES ...................................................................................... 47,587 47,587 47,587 47,587 045 FEWSG ................................................................................................... 665 665 665 665 046 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES ........................................................... 14,587 14,587 14,587 14,587 047 E–6 SERIES .......................................................................................... 189,312 189,312 189,312 –6,094 183,218 

FAB-T funding previously appropriated (OSIP 014–14) ............. [–6,094 ] 

048 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES ........................................................ 85,537 85,537 85,537 85,537 049 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ................................................................ 3,684 4 16,684 13,684 10,000 13,684

Program office sustainment ........................................................ [8,000 ] [5,000 ] [5,000 ] Sensor obsolescence .................................................................... [4 ] [5,000 ] [5,000 ] [5,000 ] 

050 T–45 SERIES ......................................................................................... 98,128 98,128 98,128 98,128 

051 POWER PLANT CHANGES ...................................................................... 22,999 22,999 22,999 22,999 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
14 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

052 JPATS SERIES ........................................................................................ 1,576 1,576 1,576 1,576053 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS ............................................................ 6,267 6,267 6,267 6,267 054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 141,685 141,685 141,685 141,685 055 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .............................................................. 120,660 120,660 120,660 120,660 056 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM ............................................... 3,554 3,554 3,554 3,554 057 ID SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 41,800 41,800 41,800 41,800 058 P–8 SERIES .......................................................................................... 9,485 9,485 9,485 9,485059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION ..................................................................... 14,431 14,431 14,431 14,431 060 MQ–8 SERIES ....................................................................................... 1,001 1,001 1,001 1,001 061 RQ–7 SERIES ........................................................................................ 26,433 26,433 26,433 26,433 062 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY ........................................................ 160,834 160,834 160,834 160,834 063 F–35 STOVL SERIES ............................................................................. 147,130 147,130 147,130 147,130 064 F–35 CV SERIES ................................................................................... 31,100 31,100 31,100 31,100 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 1,142,461 1,142,461 1,142,461 1,142,461 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 

066 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 410,044 410,044 410,044 410,044 067 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................ 27,450 27,450 27,450 27,450 068 WAR CONSUMABLES ............................................................................. 28,930 28,930 28,930 28,930 069 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ............................................................ 5,268 5,268 5,268 5,268 070 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 60,306 60,306 60,306 60,306 071 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 1,775 1,775 1,775 1,775 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 165 17,927,651 182 17,957,651 165 17,959,651 –52,248 165 17,875,403 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

001 TRIDENT II MODS .................................................................................. 1,140,865 1,126,765 1,140,865 1,140,865 

Equipment related to New START treaty implementation .......... [–14,100 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................... 7,617 7,617 7,617 7,617 

STRATEGIC MISSILES 

003 TOMAHAWK ............................................................................................ 196 312,456 196 312,456 196 312,456 196 312,456 

TACTICAL MISSILES 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
15 

004 AMRAAM ................................................................................................ 54 95,413 54 95,413 54 95,413 54 95,413 005 SIDEWINDER .......................................................................................... 225 117,208 225 117,208 225 117,208 225 117,208 006 JSOW ..................................................................................................... 328 136,794 328 136,794 328 136,794 328 136,794 007 STANDARD MISSILE ............................................................................... 81 367,985 81 367,985 81 367,985 81 367,985 008 RAM ...................................................................................................... 66 67,596 66 67,596 66 67,596 –1,612 66 65,984 

Guidance and control assembly contract savings ..................... [–1,612 ] 

009 HELLFIRE ............................................................................................... 363 33,916 363 33,916 363 33,916 363 33,916 011 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) .......................... 50 6,278 50 6,278 50 6,278 50 6,278 012 AERIAL TARGETS ................................................................................... 41,799 41,799 41,799 41,799 013 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT ..................................................................... 3,538 3,538 3,538 3,538 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

014 ESSM ..................................................................................................... 53 76,749 53 76,749 53 76,749 53 76,749 015 HARM MODS ......................................................................................... 143 111,902 143 111,902 143 111,902 143 111,902 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

016 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................ 1,138 1,138 1,138 1,138 017 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON ................................................... 23,014 23,014 23,014 23,014 

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

018 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 84,318 84,318 84,318 84,318 

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

019 SSTD ..................................................................................................... 3,978 3,978 3,978 3,978 

020 ASW TARGETS ....................................................................................... 8,031 8,031 8,031 8,031 

MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

021 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS ....................................................................... 150 125,898 150 125,898 150 125,898 150 125,898 022 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS ........................................................... 108 53,203 108 53,203 108 53,203 108 53,203 023 QUICKSTRIKE MINE ............................................................................... 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

024 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 59,730 59,730 59,730 59,730 025 ASW RANGE SUPPORT .......................................................................... 4,222 4,222 4,222 4,222 

DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 

026 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 3,963 3,963 3,963 3,963 

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

027 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ................................................................ 12,513 12,513 12,513 12,513 

MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

028 CIWS MODS ........................................................................................... 56,308 56,308 62,708 6,400 62,708 

Additional RMA kits ..................................................................... [6,400 ] [6,400 ] 

029 COAST GUARD WEAPONS ...................................................................... 10,727 10,727 10,727 –3,458 7,269 

Machine gun equipment cost growth ......................................... [–3,458 ] 

030 GUN MOUNT MODS ............................................................................... 72,901 72,901 72,901 –13,380 59,521 

MK38 gun kits cost growth ......................................................... [–13,380 ] 

031 CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS ................................................... 1,943 1 1,943 1,943 1,943 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
16 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

032 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS ........................................ 19,758 19,758 19,758 19,758 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

034 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 52,632 52,632 52,632 52,632 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 1,817 3,122,193 1,818 3,108,093 1,817 3,128,593 –12,050 1,817 3,110,143 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 

001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 37,703 37,703 37,703 37,703 002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 65,411 65,411 65,411 65,411 003 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ................................................................. 20,284 20,284 20,284 20,284 004 PRACTICE BOMBS ................................................................................. 37,870 37,870 37,870 37,870 005 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES ........................................... 53,764 53,764 53,764 53,764 006 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES ................................................ 67,194 67,194 67,194 67,194 007 JATOS .................................................................................................... 2,749 2,749 2,749 2,749 008 LRLAP 6′′ LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE ....................................... 3,906 3,906 3,906 3,906 009 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION ............................................................... 24,151 24,151 24,151 24,151 010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION ......................................... 33,080 33,080 33,080 33,080 011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ............................................................ 40,398 40,398 40,398 40,398 012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO ............................................... 61,219 61,219 61,219 61,219 013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .......................................................... 10,637 10,637 10,637 10,637 014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION .................................................. 4,578 4,578 4,578 4,578 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ................................................................... 26,297 26,297 26,297 26,297 016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .............................................................. 6,088 6,088 6,088 6,088 017 40 MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 7,644 7,644 7,644 7,644 018 60MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................. 3,349 3,349 3,349 3,349 020 120MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 13,361 13,361 13,361 13,361 022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 2,149 2,149 2,149 2,149 023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 27,465 27,465 27,465 27,465 026 FUZE, ALL TYPES .................................................................................. 26,366 26,366 26,366 26,366 028 AMMO MODERNIZATION ........................................................................ 8,403 8,403 8,403 8,403 029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 5,201 5,201 5,201 5,201 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ...................... 589,267 589,267 589,267 589,267 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
17 

SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY OTHER WARSHIPS 

001 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ...................................................... 944,866 944,866 944,866 944,866 003 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE ................................................................ 2 2,930,704 2 3,422,704 2 2,930,704 492,000 2 3,422,704 

Increase to Virginia class ........................................................... [492,000 ] [492,000 ] 

004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 2,354,612 2,354,612 2,354,612 2,354,612 005 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS ................................................................ 1,705,424 1,705,424 1,705,424 –22,071 1,683,353 

CVN 72 requirement previously funded in Fiscal Year 2012 reprogramming. [–22,071 ] 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 245,793 245,793 245,793 245,793 007 DDG 1000 ............................................................................................. 231,694 310,994 231,694 231,694 

Increase to DDG 1000 ................................................................. [79,300 ] 

008 DDG–51 ................................................................................................ 1 1,615,564 1 1,615,564 1 1,615,564 1 1,615,564 

009 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 388,551 388,551 388,551 388,551 010 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP ....................................................................... 4 1,793,014 4 1,793,014 4 1,793,014 4 1,793,014 

AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 

012 AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE ........................................................ 1 524,000 1 524,000 1 579,300 55,300 1 579,300 

Navy requested adjustment ........................................................ [55,300 ] [55,300 ] 

014 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL ................................................................... 2,732 2,732 2,732 2,732 

AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 

016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 183,900 183,900 183,900 23,400 207,300 

Program shortfall ........................................................................ [23,400 ] 

017 OUTFITTING ........................................................................................... 450,163 450,163 450,163 450,163 019 LCAC SLEP ............................................................................................ 4 80,987 4 80,987 4 80,987 4 80,987 020 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS ................................... 625,800 988,800 725,800 107,600 733,400 

DDG–51 ....................................................................................... [332,000 ] [100,000 ] Help buy 3rd DDG–51 in FY 13 .................................................. [100,000 ] Joint High Speed Vessel .............................................................. [7,600 ] [7,600 ] MTS .............................................................................................. [23,400 ] 

TOTAL SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY ......................... 12 14,077,804 12 15,012,104 12 14,233,104 656,229 12 14,734,033 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 

001 LM–2500 GAS TURBINE ........................................................................ 10,180 10,180 10,180 10,180 002 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE ................................................................ 5,536 5,536 5,536 5,536 003 HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED) ........................................................... 16,956 16,956 16,956 –13,000 3,956 

Contract delay ............................................................................. [–13,000 ] 

GENERATORS 

004 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E ............................................................... 19,782 19,782 19,782 19,782 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
18 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 

005 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 39,509 39,509 39,509 39,509 

PERISCOPES 

006 SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP .................................................... 52,515 52,515 52,515 52,515 

OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 

007 DDG MOD .............................................................................................. 285,994 285,994 285,994 285,994 

008 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 14,389 14,389 14,389 14,389 009 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD ............................................ 2,436 2,436 2,436 2,436 010 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE .................................................................................. 12,700 12,700 12,700 12,700 

011 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM .................................. 40,329 40,329 40,329 40,329 012 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 19,603 19,603 19,603 19,603 013 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 8,678 8,678 8,678 8,678 014 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................ 74,209 74,209 74,209 74,209 015 LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 47,078 47,078 47,078 47,078 016 SUBMARINE BATTERIES ........................................................................ 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 017 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 25,053 25,053 25,053 25,053 018 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ............................................... 12,986 12,986 12,986 12,986 019 DSSP EQUIPMENT ................................................................................. 2,455 2,455 2,455 2,455 020 CG MODERNIZATION ............................................................................. 10,539 1 10,539 10,539 10,539 021 LCAC ..................................................................................................... 14,431 14,431 14,431 14,431 022 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS ............................................................ 36,700 36,700 36,700 36,700 023 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 119,902 119,902 119,902 119,902 024 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS ......................................................... 3,678 3,678 3,678 3,678 025 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM ..................................................... 8,292 8,292 8,292 8,292 

REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 

027 REACTOR COMPONENTS ....................................................................... 286,744 286,744 286,744 286,744 

OCEAN ENGINEERING 

028 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 8,780 8,780 8,780 8,780 

SMALL BOATS 

029 STANDARD BOATS ................................................................................. 36,452 36,452 36,452 –3,396 33,056 

CNIC force protection medium contract delay ............................ [–3,396 ] 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

030 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT .................................................... 36,145 36,145 36,145 36,145 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
19 

PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 

031 OPERATING FORCES IPE ....................................................................... 69,368 69,368 69,368 –19,500 49,868 

Emergent repair facility outfitting ahead of need ..................... [–19,500 ] 

OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 

032 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS ........................................................................ 106,328 106,328 106,328 106,328 033 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT .................................... 45,966 45,966 45,966 45,966 034 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES ............................................................... 59,885 59,885 59,885 59,885 035 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES ............................................................... 37,168 37,168 37,168 37,168 

LOGISTIC SUPPORT 

036 LSD MIDLIFE ......................................................................................... 77,974 1 77,974 77,974 77,974 

SHIP SONARS 

038 SPQ–9B RADAR .................................................................................... 27,934 27,934 27,934 27,934

039 AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM ............................................ 83,231 83,231 83,231 83,231 040 SSN ACOUSTICS .................................................................................... 199,438 199,438 199,438 199,438 041 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................ 9,394 9,394 9,394 9,394 042 SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS ................................................ 12,953 12,953 12,953 12,953 043 ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC ............................................................ 8,958 8,958 8,958 8,958 

ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

044 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM ........................................... 24,077 24,077 24,077 24,077 045 SSTD ..................................................................................................... 11,925 11,925 11,925 –3,425 8,500 

AN/SLQ–25X cancellation ............................................................ [–3,425 ] 

046 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ............................................................. 94,338 94,338 94,338 94,338 047 SURTASS ............................................................................................... 9,680 9,680 9,680 9,680 048 MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE .............................. 18,130 18,130 18,130 18,130 

ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 

049 AN/SLQ–32 ............................................................................................ 203,375 1 203,375 203,375 –3,684 199,691 

Excess block 2 support funding ................................................. [–3,684 ] 

RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 

050 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT ........................................................................ 123,656 1 123,656 123,656 123,656 

051 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) ......................................... 896 896 896 896 

SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT 

052 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG ............................................. 49,475 49,475 49,475 49,475 

OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

053 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY ............................................. 34,692 34,692 34,692 34,692 054 TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS) ................................................. 396 396 396 396 055 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) ..................... 15,703 15,703 15,703 15,703 056 ATDLS .................................................................................................... 3,836 3,836 3,836 3,836 057 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) ................................ 7,201 7,201 7,201 7,201 058 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT ............................................... 54,400 54,400 54,400 54,400 059 SHALLOW WATER MCM ......................................................................... 8,548 8,548 8,548 8,548 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
20 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

060 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) ...................................................... 11,765 11,765 11,765 11,765 061 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE ....................................... 6,483 6,483 6,483 6,483 062 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ............................................... 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

063 OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT ............................................................... 53,644 53,644 53,644 53,644 

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

064 MATCALS ............................................................................................... 7,461 7,461 7,461 7,461 065 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ...................................................... 9,140 9,140 9,140 9,140 066 AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ............................................... 20,798 20,798 20,798 20,798 067 NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM .............................................................. 19,754 19,754 19,754 19,754 068 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................... 8,909 8,909 8,909 8,909 069 LANDING SYSTEMS ................................................................................ 13,554 13,554 13,554 13,554 070 ID SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 38,934 38,934 38,934 38,934 071 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ................................................... 14,131 14,131 14,131 14,131 

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

072 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL ......................................... 3,249 3,249 3,249 3,249 073 MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM ...................................... 11,646 11,646 11,646 11,646 074 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS ........................................................... 18,189 18,189 18,189 18,189 075 DCGS-N ................................................................................................. 17,350 17,350 17,350 17,350 076 CANES ................................................................................................... 340,567 1 340,567 340,567 340,567 077 RADIAC .................................................................................................. 9,835 9,835 9,835 9,835 078 CANES-INTELL ....................................................................................... 59,652 59,652 59,652 59,652 079 GPETE ................................................................................................... 6,253 6,253 6,253 6,253 080 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY ............................................... 4,963 4,963 4,963 4,963 081 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION ........................................................ 4,664 4,664 4,664 4,664 082 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 66,889 66,889 66,889 66,889 

SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 

084 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION .................................................. 23,877 1 23,877 23,877 23,877 086 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M ................................................. 28,001 28,001 28,001 28,001 

SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 

087 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT ...................................................... 7,856 7,856 7,856 7,856 088 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT .......................................... 74,376 74,376 74,376 74,376 

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
21 

089 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ............................................... 27,381 27,381 27,381 27,381 090 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) ..................................................... 215,952 1 215,952 215,952 215,952 

SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 

091 JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 4,463 4,463 4,463 4,463 092 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS .............................................................. 778 778 778 778 

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 

094 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ......................................... 133,530 133,530 133,530 133,530 095 MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM ............................................................ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 

CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 

096 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP .............................................. 12,251 12,251 12,251 12,251 

OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 

097 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 2,893 2,893 2,893 2,893 

SONOBUOYS 

099 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 179,927 179,927 179,927 179,927 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

100 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............................................. 55,279 55,279 55,279 55,279 101 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS ................................................................... 8,792 8,792 8,792 8,792 102 AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 11,364 11,364 11,364 11,364 103 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT ...................................... 59,502 59,502 59,502 59,502 104 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 19,118 19,118 19,118 19,118 105 DCRS/DPL ............................................................................................. 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 106 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT ....................................................................... 29,670 29,670 29,670 29,670 107 AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES .................................................. 101,554 101,554 101,554 101,554 108 LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT ................................................. 18,293 18,293 18,293 18,293 109 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS ....................................... 7,969 7,969 7,969 7,969 110 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 5,215 5,215 5,215 5,215 111 AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM (ALIS) ......................... 4,827 4,827 4,827 4,827 

SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 

112 NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM ........................................................... 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188 113 GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT .......................................................... 4,447 4,447 4,447 4,447 

SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 

114 NATO SEASPARROW .............................................................................. 58,368 58,368 58,368 58,368 115 RAM GMLS ............................................................................................ 491 491 491 491 116 SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM ............................................................... 51,858 51,858 51,858 51,858 117 AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................................ 59,757 59,757 59,757 59,757 118 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 71,559 71,559 71,559 71,559 119 VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS ................................................................ 626 626 626 626 120 MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS ................................ 2,779 2,779 2,779 2,779 

FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

121 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP ................................................... 224,484 198,565 224,484 224,484 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
22 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

New START treaty implementation .............................................. [–25,919 ] 

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

122 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS ........................................................ 85,678 85,678 85,678 85,678 123 SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 3,913 3,913 3,913 3,913 124 SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................... 3,909 3,909 3,909 3,909 125 ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 28,694 28,694 28,694 28,694 

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

126 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP .............................................. 46,586 46,586 46,586 46,586 127 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 11,933 11,933 11,933 11,933 

OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 

128 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM ..................................................... 62,361 1 62,361 62,361 62,361 129 SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ....................................................... 41,813 41,813 41,813 41,813 130 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ................................................... 26,672 26,672 26,672 26,672 

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

131 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 132 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS ................................................................. 3,717 3,717 3,717 3,717 133 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP .............................................. 10,881 10,881 10,881 10,881 134 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748 135 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................................. 5,540 5,540 5,540 5,540 136 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT ...................................................................... 5,741 5,741 5,741 5,741 137 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 3,852 3,852 3,852 3,852 138 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION .................................................................... 25,757 25,757 25,757 25,757 139 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES ............................................................ 1,182 1,182 1,182 1,182 

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

140 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 14,250 14,250 14,250 14,250 141 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................................. 6,401 6,401 6,401 6,401 142 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 5,718 5,718 5,718 5,718 143 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS ................................................... 22,597 22,597 22,597 22,597 

TRAINING DEVICES 

144 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 22,527 22,527 22,527 22,527 

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

145 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 50,428 50,428 50,428 50,428 146 EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 2,292 2,292 2,292 2,292 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
23 

147 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 4,925 4,925 4,925 4,925 149 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 3,202 3,202 3,202 3,202 151 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 24,294 24,294 24,294 24,294 152 C4ISR EQUIPMENT ................................................................................ 4,287 4,287 4,287 4,287 153 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 18,276 18,276 18,276 18,276 154 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 134,495 134,495 134,495 134,495 155 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 324,327 324,327 324,327 324,327 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

156A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 12,140 12,140 12,140 12,140 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

157 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 317,234 316,959 317,234 317,234 

New START treaty implementation .............................................. [–275 ] 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ...................................... 6,310,257 8 6,284,063 6,310,257 –43,005 6,267,252 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 AAV7A1 PIP ........................................................................................... 32,360 32,360 32,360 32,360 

002 LAV PIP ................................................................................................. 6,003 6,003 6,003 6,003 

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 

003 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM .............................................. 589 589 589 589 004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER ............................................. 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 005 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM ....................................... 5,467 5,467 5,467 5,467 006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION ...................... 20,354 20,354 20,354 20,354 

OTHER SUPPORT 

007 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 38,446 38,446 38,446 38,446

008 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM .................................................... 4,734 4,734 4,734 4,734 

GUIDED MISSILES 

009 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE ............................................................. 15,713 15,713 15,713 15,713 010 JAVELIN ................................................................................................. 219 36,175 219 36,175 219 36,175 219 36,175 012 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H) .............................. 1,136 1,136 1,136 1,136 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 33,976 33,976 33,976 –3,898 30,078 

TOW Unit Cost Growth ................................................................. [–3,898 ] 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 

014 UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER ................................................................... 16,273 16,273 16,273 16,273 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 41,063 41,063 41,063 41,063 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

016 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM .................................................................. 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
24 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................................ 1,637 1,637 1,637 1,637 019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS ............................................................. 18,394 18,394 18,394 18,394 

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

020 RADAR SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 114,051 114,051 114,051 –12,110 101,941 

Previously funded EDM refurbishment ........................................ [–12,110 ] 

021 RQ–21 UAS ........................................................................................... 25 66,612 25 66,612 25 66,612 25 66,612 

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

022 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................................................................ 3,749 3,749 3,749 3,749 023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................... 75,979 75,979 75,979 75,979 026 RQ–11 UAV ........................................................................................... 1,653 1,653 1,653 1,653

027 DCGS-MC .............................................................................................. 9,494 9,494 9,494 9,494 

OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

028 NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 6,171 6,171 6,171 6,171 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ....................................................... 121,955 121,955 121,955 –2,000 119,955 

Unit cost growth .......................................................................... [–2,000 ] 

030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS ................................................................... 83,294 83,294 83,294 83,294 031 RADIO SYSTEMS .................................................................................... 74,718 74,718 74,718 74,718 032 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................ 47,613 47,613 47,613 47,613 033 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ........................................ 19,573 19,573 19,573 19,573 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

033A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 5,659 5,659 5,659 5,659 

ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 

034 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES ................................................... 1,039 1,039 1,039 1,039 035 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES ........................................................... 31,050 31,050 31,050 31,050 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

036 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) .................................................................. 36,333 36,333 36,333 36,333 037 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS .................................................... 3,137 3,137 3,137 3,137 040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS ............................................................ 27,385 27,385 27,385 27,385 

OTHER SUPPORT 

041 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 7,016 7,016 7,016 7,016 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................................... 14,377 14,377 14,377 14,377 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
25 

043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 24,864 24,864 24,864 24,864 044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS ..................................................................... 21,592 21,592 21,592 21,592 045 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ............................................................ 61,353 61,353 61,353 61,353 046 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 4,827 4,827 4,827 4,827 047 EOD SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 40,011 40,011 40,011 40,011 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

048 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 16,809 16,809 16,809 16,809 049 GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE) ............................. 3,408 3,408 3,408 3,408 050 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ................................................................. 48,549 48,549 48,549 48,549 051 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 190 190 190 190 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

052 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT ................................................................. 23,129 23,129 23,129 23,129 053 TRAINING DEVICES ................................................................................ 8,346 8,346 8,346 8,346 054 CONTAINER FAMILY ............................................................................... 1,857 1,857 1,857 1,857 055 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................................... 36,198 36,198 36,198 36,198 056 RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN ............................................................... 2,390 2,390 2,390 2,390 

OTHER SUPPORT 

057 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 6,525 6,525 6,525 6,525 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

058 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 13,700 13,700 13,700 13,700 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ................................. 244 1,343,511 244 1,343,511 244 1,343,511 –18,008 244 1,325,503 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES 

001 F–35 ..................................................................................................... 19 3,060,770 19 3,060,770 19 3,060,770 –71,500 19 2,989,270 

Decrease non-recurring engineering initiatives .......................... [–71,500 ] 

002 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 363,783 363,783 363,783 363,783 

OTHER AIRLIFT 

005 C–130J .................................................................................................. 6 537,517 6 537,517 6 537,517 6 537,517 006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 162,000 162,000 162,000 162,000 007 HC–130J ............................................................................................... 1 132,121 1 132,121 1 132,121 1 132,121 008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 88,000 88,000 88,000 88,000 009 MC–130J ............................................................................................... 4 389,434 4 389,434 4 389,434 4 389,434 010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 

HELICOPTERS 

015 CV–22 (MYP) ........................................................................................ 3 230,798 3 230,798 3 230,798 3 230,798 

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 

017 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C .......................................................................... 6 2,541 6 2,541 6 2,541 6 2,541 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

020 TARGET DRONES ................................................................................... 41 138,669 41 138,669 41 138,669 41 138,669 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
26 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

022 AC–130J ................................................................................................ 5 470,019 5 470,019 5 470,019 5 470,019 024 RQ–4 ..................................................................................................... 27,000 27,000 27,000 –16,000 11,000 

Production closeout ..................................................................... [–16,000 ] 

027 MQ–9 .................................................................................................... 12 272,217 18 352,217 12 242,217 6 80,000 18 352,217 

Prior year savings ....................................................................... [–30,000 ] Program increase ........................................................................ [6 ] [80,000 ] [6 ] [80,000 ] 

028 RQ–4 BLOCK 40 PROC ......................................................................... 1,747 1,747 1,747 1,747 

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 

029 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 20,019 20,019 20,019 20,019 

030 B–1B ..................................................................................................... 132,222 132,222 132,222 132,222 031 B–52 ..................................................................................................... 111,002 110,502 111,002 –5,120 105,882 

B–52 conversions related to New START treaty implementation [–500 ] Internal Weapons Bay Upgrade defer low rate initial production. [–5,120 ] 

032 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES ............................... 27,197 27,197 27,197 27,197 

TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 

033 A–10 ..................................................................................................... 47,598 47,598 47,598 47,598 034 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 354,624 354,624 354,624 354,624 035 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 11,794 11,794 11,794 11,794 036 F–22A ................................................................................................... 285,830 285,830 285,830 285,830 037 F–35 MODIFICATIONS ........................................................................... 157,777 157,777 157,777 157,777 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

038 C–5 ....................................................................................................... 2,456 2,456 2,456 2,456 

039 C–5M .................................................................................................... 1,021,967 1,021,967 1,021,967 –38,000 983,967 

Program excess ........................................................................... [–38,000 ] 

042 C–17A ................................................................................................... 143,197 143,197 143,197 143,197 043 C–21 ..................................................................................................... 103 103 103 103 044 C–32A ................................................................................................... 9,780 9,780 9,780 9,780 045 C–37A ................................................................................................... 452 452 452 452 046 C–130 AMP ........................................................................................... 8 47,300 0 

LRIP Kit Procurement .................................................................. [8 ] [47,300 ] [47,300 ] Transfer to Title II, RDAF, line 230 ............................................. [–47,300 ] 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
27 

047 GLIDER MODS ....................................................................................... 128 128 128 128 048 T–6 ....................................................................................................... 6,427 6,427 6,427 6,427 049 T–1 ....................................................................................................... 277 277 277 277 050 T–38 ..................................................................................................... 28,686 28,686 28,686 28,686 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

052 U–2 MODS ............................................................................................ 45,591 45,591 45,591 45,591 

053 KC–10A (ATCA) ..................................................................................... 70,918 70,918 70,918 70,918 054 C–12 ..................................................................................................... 1,876 1,876 1,876 1,876 055 MC–12W ............................................................................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 056 C–20 MODS .......................................................................................... 192 192 192 192 057 VC–25A MOD ........................................................................................ 263 263 263 263 058 C–40 ..................................................................................................... 6,119 6,119 6,119 6,119 059 C–130 ................................................................................................... 58,577 74,277 105,877 15,700 74,277 

C–130 avionics upgrades ........................................................... [47,300 ] C–130H Propulsion System Engine Upgrades ............................ [15,700 ] [15,700 ] 

061 C–130J MODS ....................................................................................... 10,475 10,475 10,475 10,475 

062 C–135 ................................................................................................... 46,556 46,556 46,556 46,556 063 COMPASS CALL MODS .......................................................................... 34,494 34,494 34,494 34,494 064 RC–135 ................................................................................................. 171,813 171,813 171,813 171,813 065 E–3 ....................................................................................................... 197,087 197,087 197,087 197,087 066 E–4 ....................................................................................................... 14,304 14,304 14,304 14,304 067 E–8 ....................................................................................................... 57,472 57,472 57,472 57,472 068 H–1 ....................................................................................................... 6,627 6,627 6,627 6,627 069 H–60 ..................................................................................................... 27,654 27,654 27,654 27,654 070 RQ–4 MODS .......................................................................................... 9,313 9,313 9,313 9,313 071 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS ................................................................ 16,300 16,300 16,300 16,300 072 OTHER AIRCRAFT .................................................................................. 6,948 6,948 6,948 6,948 073 MQ–1 MODS ......................................................................................... 9,734 9,734 9,734 9,734 074 MQ–9 MODS ......................................................................................... 102,970 102,970 68,470 –40,000 62,970 

Anti-ice production ahead of need ............................................. [–5,520 ] Lynx radar reduction ................................................................... [–34,500 ] [–34,480 ] 

076 RQ–4 GSRA/CSRA MODS ...................................................................... 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 077 CV–22 MODS ........................................................................................ 23,310 23,310 23,310 23,310 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

078 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ............................................................. 463,285 25 639,285 463,285 463,285 

F100–229 spare engine shortfall ............................................... [25 ] [165,000 ] MQ–9 spares ............................................................................... [11,000 ] 

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ........................................... 49,140 49,140 49,140 49,140 

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
28 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

081 B–1 ....................................................................................................... 3,683 3,683 3,683 3,683 083 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 43,786 43,786 43,786 43,786 084 B–52 ..................................................................................................... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 087 C–17A ................................................................................................... 81,952 81,952 81,952 81,952 089 C–135 ................................................................................................... 8,597 8,597 8,597 8,597 090 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 2,403 2,403 2,403 2,403 091 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 3,455 3,455 3,455 3,455 092 F–22A ................................................................................................... 5,911 5,911 5,911 5,911 

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 

094 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS ............................................................. 21,148 21,148 21,148 21,148 

WAR CONSUMABLES 

095 WAR CONSUMABLES ............................................................................. 94,947 94,947 94,947 94,947 

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 

096 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ............................................................ 1,242,004 1,242,004 1,242,004 1,242,004

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

101A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 75,845 67,545 75,845 75,845 

Program Decrease ....................................................................... [–8,300 ] 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ....................... 97 11,398,901 136 11,709,101 97 11,381,701 6 –74,920 103 11,323,981 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC 

001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC ................................................. 39,104 39,104 39,104 39,104 

TACTICAL 

002 JASSM ................................................................................................... 183 291,151 183 291,151 183 291,151 183 291,151 003 SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) .......................................................................... 225 119,904 225 119,904 225 119,904 225 119,904 004 AMRAAM ................................................................................................ 199 340,015 199 340,015 199 340,015 199 340,015 005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE .............................................................. 413 48,548 413 48,548 413 48,548 413 48,548 

006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB ....................................................................... 144 42,347 144 42,347 144 42,347 144 42,347 

INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 

007 INDUSTR’L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION .......................................... 752 752 752 752 

CLASS IV 

009 MM III MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 21,635 21,635 21,635 21,635 010 AGM–65D MAVERICK ............................................................................ 276 276 276 276 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
29 

011 AGM–88A HARM ................................................................................... 580 580 580 580 012 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) .................................................. 6,888 6,888 6,888 6,888 013 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB ....................................................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 

MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

014 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ............................................................. 72,080 71,377 72,080 72,080 

Spares and repair parts related to New START treaty implementation. [–703 ] 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

015 ADVANCED EHF ..................................................................................... 379,586 379,586 379,586 379,586 

016 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE) .......................................... 38,398 38,398 38,398 38,398 017 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT ...................................................................... 2 403,431 2 403,431 2 403,431 2 403,431 018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 74,167 74,167 74,167 74,167 019 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) ............................................................ 5,244 5,244 5,244 5,244 020 GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) ............................................................. 55,997 55,997 55,997 55,997 021 DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE) ........................................... 95,673 95,673 95,673 95,673 022 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE) ...................................... 5 1,852,900 5 1,852,900 5 1,852,900 5 1,852,900 023 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) .............................................................................. 583,192 583,192 583,192 583,192 

SPECIAL PROGRAMS 

029 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS ............................................................... 36,716 36,716 36,716 36,716 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

029A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 829,702 829,702 829,702 829,702

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......................... 1,171 5,343,286 1,171 5,342,583 1,171 5,343,286 1,171 5,343,286 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ............................................................................................... 15,735 15,735 15,735 15,735 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ......................................................................................... 129,921 129,921 129,921 129,921 

BOMBS 

003 PRACTICE BOMBS ................................................................................. 30,840 30,840 30,840 30,840 004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 187,397 187,397 187,397 187,397 005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION .......................................................... 6,965 188,510 6,965 188,510 6,965 188,510 6,965 188,510 

OTHER ITEMS 

006 CAD/PAD ............................................................................................... 35,837 35,837 35,837 35,837 

007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) .............................................. 7,531 7,531 7,531 7,531 008 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 499 499 499 499 009 MODIFICATIONS ..................................................................................... 480 480 480 480 010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 9,765 9,765 9,765 9,765 

FLARES 

011 FLARES .................................................................................................. 55,864 55,864 55,864 55,864 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
30 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

FUZES 

013 FUZES ................................................................................................... 76,037 76,037 76,037 76,037 

SMALL ARMS 

014 SMALL ARMS ......................................................................................... 21,026 21,026 21,026 21,026 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ............ 6,965 759,442 6,965 759,442 6,965 759,442 6,965 759,442 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 

001 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 2,048 2,048 2,048 2,048 

CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 

002 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE ................................................................. 8,019 8,019 8,019 8,019 003 CAP VEHICLES ...................................................................................... 946 946 946 946 004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 

005 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES ..................................................... 13,093 13,093 13,093 13,093 006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 13,983 13,983 13,983 13,983 

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 

007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES ........................................... 23,794 23,794 23,794 23,794 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

008 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 8,669 8,669 8,669 8,669 

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 

009 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP ........................................ 6,144 6,144 6,144 6,144 010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 

012 COMSEC EQUIPMENT ............................................................................ 149,661 149,661 149,661 149,661

013 MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC) ................................................................... 726 726 726 726 

INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 

014 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT ................................................... 2,789 2,789 2,789 2,789 015 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 31,875 31,875 31,875 31,875 016 ADVANCE TECH SENSORS ..................................................................... 452 452 452 452 017 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ............................................................... 14,203 14,203 14,203 14,203 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

018 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS ............................................... 46,232 46,232 46,232 46,232 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
31 

019 NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM ............................................................... 11,685 11,685 11,685 11,685 020 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED ...................................................... 19,248 19,248 19,248 19,248 021 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS ...................................... 19,292 19,292 19,292 19,292 022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ..................................................... 17,166 17,166 17,166 17,166 023 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL .................................................. 22,723 22,723 22,723 22,723 024 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX .......................................................... 27,930 27,930 27,930 27,930 025 TAC SIGNIT SPT .................................................................................... 217 217 217 217 

SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 

027 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ................................................. 49,627 49,627 49,627 49,627 028 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS .............................................. 13,559 13,559 13,559 13,559 029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL .................................................... 11,186 11,186 11,186 11,186 030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM ............................................ 43,238 43,238 43,238 43,238 031 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES .................................................................. 10,431 10,431 10,431 10,431 032 C3 COUNTERMEASURES ....................................................................... 13,769 13,769 13,769 13,769 033 GCSS-AF FOS ........................................................................................ 19,138 19,138 19,138 19,138 034 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM ...................................................... 8,809 8,809 8,809 8,809 035 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS ........................................... 26,935 26,935 26,935 26,935 

AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 

036 INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS .................................................... 80,558 80,558 80,558 80,558 038 AFNET .................................................................................................... 97,588 97,588 97,588 97,588 039 VOICE SYSTEMS .................................................................................... 8,419 8,419 8,419 8,419 040 USCENTCOM .......................................................................................... 34,276 34,276 34,276 34,276 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

041 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE ................................................ 28,235 28,235 28,235 28,235 042 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE ............................................................................ 2,061 2,061 2,061 2,061 043 NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE ............................................................. 4,415 4,415 4,415 4,415 044 AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE ........................................... 30,237 30,237 30,237 30,237 045 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE ....................................................... 98,062 98,062 98,062 98,062 046 MILSATCOM SPACE ............................................................................... 105,935 105,935 105,935 105,935 

047 SPACE MODS SPACE ............................................................................. 37,861 37,861 37,861 37,861 048 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM ...................................................................... 7,171 7,171 7,171 7,171 

ORGANIZATION AND BASE 

049 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 83,537 83,537 83,537 83,537 050 COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER ................................................. 11,884 11,884 11,884 –3,250 8,634 

Unjustified unit cost growth for batteries .................................. [–3,250 ] 

051 RADIO EQUIPMENT ................................................................................ 14,711 14,711 14,711 14,711 052 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 10,275 10,275 10,275 10,275 053 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................ 50,907 50,907 50,907 50,907 

MODIFICATIONS 

054 COMM ELECT MODS ............................................................................. 55,701 55,701 55,701 55,701 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
32 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 

055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES ........................................................................ 14,524 14,524 14,524 –10,488 4,036 

Night Vision Cueing and Display termination ............................ [–10,488 ] 

056 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 28,655 28,655 28,655 28,655 

DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 

057 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ........................................... 9,332 9,332 9,332 9,332 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

058 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT .............................................................. 16,762 16,762 16,762 16,762 059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS .................................................................. 33,768 33,768 33,768 33,768 060 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT ................................................... 2,495 2,495 2,495 2,495 061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT ........................................................................... 12,859 12,859 12,859 12,859 062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 1,954 1,954 1,954 1,954 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

064 DARP RC135 ......................................................................................... 24,528 24,528 24,528 24,528 065 DCGS-AF ............................................................................................... 137,819 137,819 137,819 137,819 067 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM ................................................................. 479,586 479,586 479,586 479,586 068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. .......................................... 45,159 45,159 45,159 45,159 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 14,519,256 14,519,256 14,519,256 14,519,256 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

069 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 25,746 25,746 25,746 25,746 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............................ 16,760,581 16,760,581 16,760,581 –13,738 16,746,843 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA 

001 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 1,291 1,291 1,291 1,291 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA 

002 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 5,711 5,711 5,711 5,711 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 

003 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION ............................................................... 47,201 47,201 47,201 47,201 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

009 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY ....................................................... 16,189 16,189 16,189 16,189 012 TELEPORT PROGRAM ............................................................................ 66,075 66,075 66,075 66,075 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
33 

013 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 83,881 83,881 83,881 83,881 014 NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ...................................... 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 015 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK ......................................... 125,557 125,557 125,557 125,557 017 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ................................................................ 16,941 16,941 16,941 16,941 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 

018 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 13,137 13,137 13,137 13,137 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 

019 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 5 15,414 5 15,414 5 15,414 5 15,414 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 

020 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS ............................ 1,454 1,454 1,454 1,454 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 

021 EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................... 978 978 978 978 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS 

022 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 5,020 5,020 5,020 5,020 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 

023 VEHICLES .............................................................................................. 2 100 2 100 2 100 2 100 

024 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 3 13,395 3 13,395 3 13,395 3 13,395

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 

026 THAAD ................................................................................................... 36 581,005 36 581,005 36 581,005 36 581,005 

027 AEGIS BMD ........................................................................................... 52 580,814 52 580,814 52 580,814 52 580,814 028 BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS ..................................................................... 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 029 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III ...................................................................... 1 131,400 1 131,400 1 131,400 1 131,400 

031 IRON DOME ........................................................................................... 1 220,309 1 220,309 1 220,309 1 220,309 033 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 107,000 0 

Advance Procurement of 14 GBIs, beginning with booster 

motor sets.

[107,000 ] 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 

039 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ........................... 14,363 14,363 14,363 14,363 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 

040 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD ...................................................................... 37,345 37,345 37,345 37,345 041 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE ...................................................... 16,678 16,678 16,678 16,678 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 

042 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS ........................................................................ 14,792 14,792 14,792 14,792 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 

043 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS ...................................................................... 35,259 35,259 35,259 35,259 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 544,272 544,272 544,272 544,272

AVIATION PROGRAMS 

045 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT ..................................... 112,456 112,456 112,456 112,456 046 MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ..................................................... 81,457 81,457 81,457 81,457 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
34 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

047 NON-STANDARD AVIATION ..................................................................... 2,650 2,650 2,650 2,650 048 U–28 ..................................................................................................... 56,208 56,208 56,208 56,208 049 MH–47 CHINOOK .................................................................................. 19,766 19,766 19,766 19,766 050 RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE .................................................... 850 850 850 850 051 CV–22 MODIFICATION ........................................................................... 3 98,927 3 98,927 3 98,927 3 98,927 052 MQ–1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ..................................................... 20,576 20,576 20,576 20,576 053 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ..................................................... 1,893 1,893 14,893 13,000 14,893 

Capability Improvements ............................................................. [13,000 ] [13,000 ] 

055 STUASL0 ................................................................................................ 13,166 13,166 13,166 13,166 

056 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE ................................................................ 107,687 107,687 107,687 107,687 057 AC/MC–130J ......................................................................................... 51,870 51,870 51,870 51,870 059 C–130 MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 71,940 71,940 71,940 –10,623 61,317 

C–130 TF/TA—early to need ...................................................... [–10,623 ] 

SHIPBUILDING 

061 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS ........................................................................ 37,439 37,439 37,439 37,439 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

063 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M ...................................................................... 159,029 159,029 159,029 159,029 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 79,819 79,819 79,819 79,819 068 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS .......................... 14,906 14,906 14,906 14,906 070 OTHER ITEMS <$5M ............................................................................. 81,711 81,711 81,711 81,711 071 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS ............................................................... 35,053 35,053 33,897 –1,156 33,897 

CCFLIR—Transfer at USSOCOM Request ................................... [–1,156 ] [–1,156 ] 

074 SPECIAL PROGRAMS ............................................................................. 41,526 41,526 41,526 41,526 075 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................................. 43,353 43,353 43,353 43,353 076 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M .................................................................... 210,540 210,540 210,540 210,540 078 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS ....................................................... 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 082 GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES ........................................... 6,645 6,645 6,645 6,645 083 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ..................................... 25,581 25,581 25,581 25,581 089 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ............................................................. 191,061 191,061 191,061 191,061 

CBDP 

091 INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION ...................................................... 14,271 14,271 14,271 14,271 092 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION ...................................................................... 101,667 101,667 101,667 101,667 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
35 

094 JOINT BIO DEFENSE PROGRAM (MEDICAL) ........................................... 13,447 13,447 13,447 13,447 095 COLLECTIVE PROTECTION ..................................................................... 20,896 20,896 20,896 20,896 096 CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE ................................................................ 144,540 144,540 144,540 144,540 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE .................................. 103 4,534,083 103 4,641,083 103 4,545,927 1,221 103 4,535,304 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND .......................................... 98,800 98,800 –98,800 0 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–98,800 ] [–98,800 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ................ 98,800 98,800 –98,800 0 TOTAL PROCUREMENT ............................................................. 229,104 98,227,168 227,777 99,666,171 197,783 98,151,289 –31,305 215,081 197,799 98,442,249 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4101.LOC

December 4, 2013 (7:37 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 

002 SATURN ARCH (MIP) ............................................................................. 4 48,000 4 48,000 4 48,000 4 48,000 

004 MQ–1 UAV ............................................................................................ 4 31,988 4 31,988 4 31,988 4 31,988 

ROTARY 

009 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD ............................................... 4 142,000 4 142,000 4 142,000 4 142,000 011 KIOWA WARRIOR WRA ........................................................................... 14 163,800 14 163,800 14 163,800 14 163,800 

014 CH–47 HELICOPTER .............................................................................. 10 386,000 10 386,000 10 386,000 10 386,000 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................ 36 771,788 36 771,788 36 771,788 36 771,788 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ...................................................................... 550 54,000 550 79,887 550 54,000 550 54,000 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [25,887 ] 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) .......................................................... 383 39,045 383 39,045 383 39,045 383 39,045 

010 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM ................................. 38 35,600 38 35,600 38 35,600 38 35,600 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................... 971 128,645 971 154,532 971 128,645 971 128,645 

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 

033 M16 RIFLE MODS .................................................................................. 15,422 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [15,422 ] 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY .............................. 15,422 0 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4102.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 5,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [5,000 ] 

008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES ....................... 10,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [20,000 ] 

015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ....................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 ................................................ 120 11,000 120 11,000 120 11,000 120 11,000 

MINES 

018 MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES .......................................... 9,482 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [9,482 ] 

ROCKETS 

021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES ........................................................... 57,000 57,000 57,000 57,000 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................... 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 

MISCELLANEOUS 

028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY ..................... 120 180,900 120 215,382 120 180,900 120 180,900 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 

003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) .......................................... 2,500 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [2,500 ] 

005 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) .................................... 2,050 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [2,050 ] 

013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ........................ 321,040 562,596 321,040 321,040 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [241,556 ] 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

060 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM ....................... 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4102.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
4 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

067 DCGS-A (MIP) ....................................................................................... 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 071 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) ................................ 5,980 5,980 5,980 5,980 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ............................................. 67 57,800 67 83,255 67 57,800 67 57,800 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [25,455 ] 

078 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE ........................... 15,300 15,300 15,300 15,300 079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES ...................... 4,221 4,221 4,221 4,221 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP ............................................................... 34 1,834 34 1,834 34 1,834 34 1,834 093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) .................................... 8,400 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [8,400 ] 

096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) ............................................................. 137 21,000 137 21,000 137 21,000 137 21,000 

098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ......................................................................... 4 85,830 4 85,830 4 85,830 4 85,830 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 

110 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ................................................... 3,200 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [3,200 ] 

112 SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (SALE) ..................................... 5,160 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [5,160 ] 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 

126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ........................................ 15,000 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [15,000 ] 

127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) ........................................................... 24,932 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [24,932 ] 

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 

137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) ...................... 3,565 0 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4102.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
5 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [3,565 ] 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

146 FORCE PROVIDER ................................................................................. 3 51,654 3 51,654 3 51,654 3 51,654 

147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 18 6,264 18 6,264 18 6,264 18 6,264 

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 

152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER .................................. 2,119 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [2,119 ] 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

176 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT ................................................ 7,000 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [7,000 ] 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................................... 263 603,123 263 944,060 263 603,123 263 603,123 

JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND NETWORK ATTACK 

001 ATTACK THE NETWORK ......................................................................... 417,700 417,700 417,700 417,700 

JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT 

002 DEFEAT THE DEVICE ............................................................................. 248,886 248,886 248,886 248,886 

FORCE TRAINING 

003 TRAIN THE FORCE ................................................................................. 106,000 106,000 106,000 

Program decrease ........................................................................ [–106,000 ] 

STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 

004 OPERATIONS .......................................................................................... 227,414 227,414 182,414 –45,000 182,414 

Program decrease ........................................................................ [–45,000 ] [–45,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND ................ 1,000,000 1,000,000 849,000 –45,000 955,000 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

011 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) .......................................................... 1 29,520 1 29,520 1 29,520 1 29,520 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

026 MQ–8 UAV ............................................................................................ 1 13,100 1 13,100 1 13,100 1 13,100 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

031 AV–8 SERIES ........................................................................................ 57,652 57,652 57,652 57,652 

033 F–18 SERIES ......................................................................................... 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 039 EP–3 SERIES ........................................................................................ 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 049 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ................................................................ 3,375 3,375 3,375 3,375 054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 49,183 49,183 49,183 49,183 055 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .............................................................. 4,190 4,190 4,190 4,190 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4102.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
6 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION ..................................................................... 20,700 20,700 20,700 20,700 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 24,776 24,776 24,776 24,776 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 2 240,696 2 240,696 2 240,696 2 240,696 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY TACTICAL MISSILES 

009 HELLFIRE ............................................................................................... 270 27,000 270 27,000 270 27,000 270 27,000 

010 LASER MAVERICK .................................................................................. 500 58,000 500 58,000 500 58,000 500 58,000 011 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) .......................... 9 1,500 9 1,500 9 1,500 9 1,500 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 779 86,500 779 86,500 779 86,500 779 86,500 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 

001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 11,424 11,424 11,424 11,424 002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 30,332 30,332 30,332 30,332 003 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ................................................................. 8,282 8,282 8,282 8,282 006 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES ................................................ 31,884 31,884 31,884 31,884 011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ............................................................ 409 409 409 409 012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO ............................................... 11,976 11,976 11,976 11,976 013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .......................................................... 2,447 2,447 2,447 2,447 014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION .................................................. 7,692 7,692 7,692 7,692 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ................................................................... 13,461 13,461 13,461 13,461 016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .............................................................. 3,310 3,310 3,310 3,310 017 40 MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 6,244 6,244 6,244 6,244 018 60MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................. 3,368 3,368 3,368 3,368 019 81MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................. 9,162 9,162 9,162 9,162 020 120MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 10,266 10,266 10,266 10,266 021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 1,887 1,887 1,887 1,887 022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 37,459 37,459 37,459 37,459 024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 970 970 970 970 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4102.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
7 

025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................... 418 418 418 418 026 FUZE, ALL TYPES .................................................................................. 14,219 14,219 14,219 14,219 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ...................... 206,821 206,821 206,821 206,821 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

135 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................................. 17,968 17,968 17,968 17,968 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ...................................... 17,968 17,968 17,968 17,968 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS GUIDED MISSILES 

010 JAVELIN ................................................................................................. 180 29,334 180 29,334 180 29,334 180 29,334 

011 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW .......................................................................... 105 105 105 105 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 16,081 16,081 16,081 –2,898 13,183 

TOW Unit Cost Growth ................................................................. [–2,898 ] 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 16,081 16,081 16,081 16,081 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

017 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 2,831 2,831 2,831 2,831 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................................ 8,170 8,170 8,170 8,170 

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................... 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 026 RQ–11 UAV ........................................................................................... 2,830 2,830 2,830 2,830

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ....................................................... 4,866 4,866 4,866 4,866 030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS ................................................................... 265 265 265 265 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................................... 114 114 114 114 043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 523 523 523 523 044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS ..................................................................... 365 365 365 365 045 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ............................................................ 2,004 2,004 2,004 2,004 047 EOD SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 42,930 42,930 42,930 42,930 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

055 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................................... 385 385 385 385 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ................................. 180 129,584 180 129,584 180 129,584 –2,898 180 126,686 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4102.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
8 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

032 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES ............................... 94,050 94,050 94,050 94,050 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

052 U–2 MODS ............................................................................................ 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300 059 C–130 ................................................................................................... 1,618 1,618 1,618 1,618 064 RC–135 ................................................................................................. 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ........................................... 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ....................... 115,668 115,668 115,668 115,668 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL 

005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE .............................................................. 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......................... 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ............................................................................................... 326 326 326 326 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ......................................................................................... 17,634 17,634 17,634 17,634 

BOMBS 

004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 37,514 37,514 37,514 37,514 005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION .......................................................... 2,879 84,459 2,879 84,459 2,879 84,459 2,879 84,459 

FLARES 

011 FLARES .................................................................................................. 14,973 14,973 14,973 14,973 

012 FUZES ................................................................................................... 3,859 3,859 3,859 3,859 

SMALL ARMS 

014 SMALL ARMS ......................................................................................... 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ............ 2,879 159,965 2,879 159,965 2,879 159,965 2,879 159,965 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ..................................................... 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 

SPACE PROGRAMS 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4102.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
9 

046 MILSATCOM SPACE ............................................................................... 5,695 5,695 5,695 5,695 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS .................................................................. 60,600 60,600 60,600 60,600 061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT ........................................................................... 68,000 68,000 68,000 68,000 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. .......................................... 58,250 58,250 58,250 58,250 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 2,380,501 2,380,501 2,380,501 2,380,501 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............................ 2,574,846 2,574,846 2,574,846 2,574,846 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

012 TELEPORT PROGRAM ............................................................................ 4,760 4,760 4,760 4,760 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 78,986 78,986 78,986 78,986 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

062 ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT ................................................................ 25 2,841 25 2,841 25 2,841 25 2,841 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 1 13,300 1 13,300 1 13,300 1 13,300 

084 SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS .................................. 53 8,034 53 8,034 53 8,034 53 8,034 089 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ............................................................. 126 3,354 126 3,354 126 3,354 126 3,354 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE .................................. 205 111,275 205 111,275 205 111,275 205 111,275 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND .......................................... 15,000 15,000 –15,000 0 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ................ 15,000 15,000 –15,000 0 

NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT UNDISTRIBUTED 

999 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ............................................................... 400,000 400,000 400,000 

Program increase ........................................................................ [400,000 ] [400,000 ] 

TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT ................. 400,000 400,000 400,000 TOTAL PROCUREMENT ............................................................. 5,646 6,366,979 5,646 7,168,707 5,646 6,215,979 337,102 5,646 6,704,081 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4102.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND 

EVALUATION 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601101A IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ......................................... 21,803 21,803 21,803 21,803 002 0601102A DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 221,901 221,901 221,901 221,901 

003 0601103A UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ................................................................. 79,359 79,359 79,359 79,359 004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS ........................................... 113,662 113,662 113,662 113,662

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 436,725 436,725 436,725 436,725 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

005 0602105A MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................. 26,585 26,585 26,585 26,585 

006 0602120A SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY .................................................... 43,170 43,170 43,170 43,170 007 0602122A TRACTOR HIP .................................................................................................... 36,293 36,293 36,293 36,293 008 0602211A AVIATION TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................... 55,615 55,615 55,615 55,615 009 0602270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY .............................................................. 17,585 17,585 17,585 17,585 010 0602303A MISSILE TECHNOLOGY ...................................................................................... 51,528 51,528 51,528 51,528 011 0602307A ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................. 26,162 26,162 26,162 26,162 012 0602308A ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION ......................................................... 24,063 24,063 24,063 24,063 013 0602601A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 64,589 64,589 64,589 64,589 014 0602618A BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................. 68,300 68,300 78,300 8,000 76,300 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

WIAMan schedule adjustment ................................................................ [10,000 ] [8,000 ] 

015 0602622A CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY ...................... 4,490 4,490 4,490 4,490 016 0602623A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .......................................................... 7,818 7,818 7,818 7,818 017 0602624A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ........................................................ 37,798 37,798 37,798 37,798 

018 0602705A ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES ....................................................... 59,021 59,021 59,021 59,021 019 0602709A NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................. 43,426 43,426 43,426 43,426 020 0602712A COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 20,574 20,574 20,574 20,574 021 0602716A HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 21,339 21,339 21,339 21,339 022 0602720A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY ......................................................... 20,316 20,316 20,316 20,316 023 0602782A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY ................................. 34,209 34,209 34,209 34,209 024 0602783A COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY ....................................................... 10,439 10,439 10,439 10,439025 0602784A MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 70,064 70,064 70,064 70,064 026 0602785A MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 027 0602786A WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY .............................................................................. 31,546 31,546 31,546 31,546 028 0602787A MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................... 93,340 93,340 93,340 93,340 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 885,924 885,924 895,924 8,000 893,924 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

029 0603001A WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................................................ 56,056 56,056 56,056 56,056 

030 0603002A MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................................. 62,032 62,032 62,032 62,032 031 0603003A AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................................. 81,080 81,080 81,080 81,080 032 0603004A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...................................... 63,919 63,919 63,919 63,919 033 0603005A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...................... 97,043 97,043 97,043 97,043 034 0603006A SPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 5,866 5,866 5,866 5,866 035 0603007A MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................ 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 036 0603008A ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 40,416 40,416 40,416 40,416 037 0603009A TRACTOR HIKE .................................................................................................. 9,166 9,166 9,166 9,166 038 0603015A NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS ................................... 13,627 13,627 13,627 13,627 039 0603020A TRACTOR ROSE ................................................................................................ 10,667 10,667 10,667 10,667 041 0603125A COMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................ 15,054 15,054 15,054 15,054 042 0603130A TRACTOR NAIL .................................................................................................. 3,194 3,194 3,194 3,194 043 0603131A TRACTOR EGGS ................................................................................................ 2,367 2,367 2,367 2,367 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
4 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

044 0603270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY .............................................................. 25,348 25,348 25,348 25,348 045 0603313A MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................................. 64,009 64,009 64,009 64,009 046 0603322A TRACTOR CAGE ................................................................................................ 11,083 11,083 11,083 11,083 047 0603461A HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ....................... 180,662 180,662 180,662 180,662 048 0603606A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........................ 22,806 22,806 22,806 22,806 049 0603607A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .......................................................... 5,030 5,030 5,030 5,030 050 0603710A NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......................................................... 36,407 36,407 36,407 36,407 051 0603728A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS ........................... 11,745 11,745 11,745 11,745 052 0603734A MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......................................... 23,717 23,717 23,717 23,717 053 0603772A ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ......... 33,012 33,012 33,012 33,012 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 882,106 882,106 882,106 882,106 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

054 0603305A ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ............................................. 15,301 15,301 15,301 15,301 055 0603308A ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION .............................................................. 13,592 13,592 13,592 13,592 056 0603619A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV .............................................. 10,625 10,625 10,625 –10,625 0 

Program deferred to fiscal year 2019 .................................................... [–10,625 ] 

058 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION ...................................................... 30,612 30,612 30,612 30,612 059 0603653A ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS) ................................................. 49,989 49,989 49,989 49,989 060 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY ........................................................... 6,703 6,703 6,703 6,703 061 0603766A TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV ........................... 6,894 6,894 6,894 6,894 062 0603774A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 9,066 9,066 9,066 9,066 063 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL ....................................... 2,633 2,633 2,633 2,633 064 0603782A WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-TACTICAL—DEM/VAL .......................... 272,384 272,384 272,384 –37,000 235,384 

Excess program growth .......................................................................... [–37,000 ] 

065 0603790A NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 3,874 3,874 3,874 3,874066 0603801A AVIATION—ADV DEV ........................................................................................ 5,018 5,018 5,018 5,018 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
5 

067 0603804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV ......................................... 11,556 11,556 11,556 11,556 069 0603807A MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV ........................................................................ 15,603 15,603 15,603 15,603 070 0603827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 14,159 14,159 14,159 14,159 071 0603850A INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE .................................................................. 79 79 79 79 072 0604115A TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES ........................................................... 55,605 55,605 55,605 55,605 074 0604319A INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2) 79,232 79,232 79,232 79,232 075 0604785A INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE (BUDGET ACTIVITY 4) ........................................ 4,476 4,476 4,476 4,476 076 0305205A ENDURANCE UAVS ............................................................................................ 28,991 991 –28,991 0 

LEMV termination .................................................................................... [–28,000 ] [–28,991 ] [–28,991 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ......... 636,392 608,392 607,401 –76,616 559,776 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

077 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS ......................................................................................... 76,588 76,588 76,588 76,588 078 0604220A ARMED, DEPLOYABLE HELOS ........................................................................... 73,309 73,309 73,309 73,309 079 0604270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 154,621 154,621 154,621 154,621 080 0604280A JOINT TACTICAL RADIO ..................................................................................... 31,826 31,826 31,826 31,826 081 0604290A MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) ........................................ 23,341 23,341 23,341 23,341 082 0604321A ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM ...................................................................... 4,839 4,839 4,839 4,839 083 0604328A TRACTOR CAGE ................................................................................................ 23,841 23,841 23,841 23,841 084 0604601A INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS ......................................................................... 79,855 90,855 79,855 11,000 90,855 

Transfer from WTCV line 15—XM25 development ................................ [11,000 ] [11,000 ] 

085 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES ........................................................................... 2,140 2,140 2,140 2,140 

086 0604611A JAVELIN ............................................................................................................. 5,002 5,002 5,002 5,002 087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES ........................................................... 21,321 21,321 21,321 21,321 

088 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ..................................................................................... 514 514 514 514 093 0604710A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV ................................................................. 43,405 43,405 43,405 43,405 094 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT .............................................. 1,939 1,939 1,939 1,939 095 0604715A NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV .................................................. 18,980 18,980 18,980 18,980 097 0604741A AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV .............. 18,294 18,294 18,294 18,294 098 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 17,013 17,013 17,013 17,013 099 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT .................................................. 6,701 6,701 6,701 6,701 100 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV ........................... 14,575 14,575 14,575 14,575 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
6 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

101 0604780A COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE ........................................ 27,634 27,634 27,634 27,634 102 0604798A BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION ...................................... 193,748 193,748 193,748 193,748 103 0604802A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV ............................................................ 15,721 15,721 15,721 15,721 104 0604804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV ......................................... 41,703 41,703 41,703 41,703 105 0604805A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV ..................... 7,379 7,379 7,379 7,379 106 0604807A MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV 39,468 39,468 39,468 39,468 107 0604808A LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV ...................................................... 92,285 92,285 92,285 92,285 108 0604814A ARTILLERY MUNITIONS—EMD .......................................................................... 8,209 8,209 8,209 8,209 109 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE ................ 22,958 22,958 22,958 22,958 110 0604820A RADAR DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................... 1,549 1,549 1,549 1,549 111 0604822A GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) .............................. 17,342 17,342 227 –17,115 227 

Excess to requirement ............................................................................ [–17,115 ] [–17,115 ] 

112 0604823A FIREFINDER ....................................................................................................... 47,221 47,221 47,221 47,221 113 0604827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL ......................................................... 48,477 48,477 48,477 48,477 114 0604854A ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD ............................................................................. 80,613 80,613 121,313 40,700 121,313 

Transfer from WTCV 6 at Army Request ................................................ [40,700 ] [40,700 ] 

117 0605013A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 68,814 68,814 68,814 68,814 118 0605018A INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A) ........................... 137,290 137,290 137,290 137,290 119 0605028A ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) .................................................. 116,298 116,298 116,298 116,298 

120 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) ...................................................... 68,148 68,148 68,148 68,148 121 0605380A AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS) .................................................... 33,219 33,219 33,219 33,219 122 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) ........................................................... 15,127 15,127 15,127 15,127 124 0605456A PAC–3/MSE MISSILE ........................................................................................ 68,843 68,843 68,843 68,843 125 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) ................................ 364,649 364,649 364,649 364,649 126 0605625A MANNED GROUND VEHICLE .............................................................................. 592,201 592,201 592,201 592,201 127 0605626A AERIAL COMMON SENSOR ................................................................................ 10,382 10,382 10,382 10,382 128 0605766A NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) ................................................... 21,143 21,143 21,143 21,143 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
7 

129 0605812A JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING 

DEVELOPMENT PH.

84,230 84,230 84,230 84,230 

130 0303032A TROJAN—RH12 ................................................................................................ 3,465 3,465 3,465 3,465 131 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 10,806 10,806 10,806 10,806 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ............................. 2,857,026 2,868,026 2,880,611 34,585 2,891,611 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

132 0604256A THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 16,934 16,934 16,934 16,934 133 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 13,488 13,488 13,488 13,488 134 0604759A MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ................................................................................. 46,672 46,672 46,672 46,672 135 0605103A RAND ARROYO CENTER .................................................................................... 11,919 11,919 11,919 11,919 136 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL .................................................................................. 193,658 193,658 193,658 193,658 137 0605326A CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM ........................................................ 37,158 37,158 37,158 37,158 139 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES ............................................................... 340,659 340,659 340,659 340,659 140 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS ............................. 66,061 66,061 66,061 66,061 141 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS ................................................................ 43,280 43,280 43,280 43,280 143 0605606A AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION ................................................................................. 6,025 6,025 6,025 6,025 144 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES ........................................ 7,349 7,349 7,349 7,349 145 0605706A MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 19,809 19,809 19,809 19,809 146 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS ................................................................... 5,941 5,941 5,941 5,941 147 0605712A SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING ............................................................... 55,504 55,504 55,504 55,504 148 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION CENTER ............................................................................. 65,274 65,274 65,274 65,274 149 0605718A ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG ............................ 1,283 1,283 1,283 1,283 150 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................................................... 82,035 82,035 82,035 82,035 151 0605803A TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES .............................................................. 33,853 33,853 38,853 33,853 

Internet mapping .................................................................................... [5,000 ] 

152 0605805A MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY ......................... 53,340 53,340 53,340 53,340 153 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT .............................. 5,193 5,193 5,193 5,193 154 0605898A MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................................................. 54,175 54,175 54,175 54,175 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ................................................ 1,159,610 1,159,610 1,164,610 1,159,610 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
8 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

156 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ...................................................... 110,576 110,576 110,576 110,576 157 0607141A LOGISTICS AUTOMATION ................................................................................... 3,717 3,717 3,717 3,717 159 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT ................................................................... 70,053 70,053 70,053 70,053 160 0102419A AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE ................................................................... 98,450 68,450 98,450 –15,000 83,450 

JLENS program reduction ........................................................................ [–30,000 ] [–15,000 ] 

161 0203726A ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM .............................................. 30,940 30,940 30,940 30,940 162 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ................................................. 177,532 177,532 177,532 177,532 

163 0203740A MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM ......................................................................... 36,495 36,495 36,495 36,495 164 0203744A AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS .................... 257,187 257,187 277,171 14,061 271,248 

Transfer from APA 11 at Army request .................................................. [19,984 ] [14,061 ] 

165 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............................. 315 315 315 315 166 0203758A DIGITIZATION ..................................................................................................... 6,186 6,186 6,186 6,186 167 0203801A MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............................ 1,578 1,578 1,578 1,578 168 0203802A OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS .................................... 62,100 62,100 62,100 62,100 169 0203808A TRACTOR CARD ................................................................................................ 18,778 18,778 18,778 18,778 170 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM ................................................................... 7,108 7,108 7,108 7,108 173 0303028A SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ....................................................... 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600174 0303140A INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 9,357 9,357 9,357 9,357 175 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 41,225 41,225 41,225 41,225 176 0303142A SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) ...................................................... 18,197 18,197 18,197 18,197177 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................................... 14,215 14,215 14,215 14,215 179 0305204A TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ......................................................... 33,533 33,533 33,533 33,533 180 0305208A DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 27,622 27,622 27,622 27,622 181 0305219A MQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS ................................................................................ 10,901 10,901 10,901 10,901 182 0305232A RQ–11 UAV ....................................................................................................... 2,321 2,321 2,321 2,321 183 0305233A RQ–7 UAV ........................................................................................................ 12,031 12,031 12,031 12,031 185 0307665A BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE .............................................................. 12,449 12,449 12,449 12,449 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
9 

186 0708045A END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES ......................................... 56,136 56,136 56,136 56,136 

186A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 4,717 4,717 4,717 4,717 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 1,131,319 1,101,319 1,151,303 –939 1,130,380 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY ................... 7,989,102 7,942,102 8,018,680 –34,970 7,954,132 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601103N UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ................................................................. 112,617 122,617 112,617 112,617 

Program increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] 

002 0601152N IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ......................................... 18,230 18,230 18,230 18,230 003 0601153N DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 484,459 484,459 484,459 484,459 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 615,306 625,306 615,306 615,306 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602114N POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ........................................................ 104,513 104,513 104,513 104,513 

005 0602123N FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ........................................................ 145,307 145,307 145,307 145,307 006 0602131M MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY ............................................... 47,334 47,334 47,334 47,334 007 0602235N COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH .......................................................... 34,163 34,163 34,163 34,163 008 0602236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH ............................................ 49,689 49,689 49,689 49,689 009 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH ......................................... 97,701 97,701 97,701 97,701 010 0602435N OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH .............................. 45,685 63,685 45,685 15,000 60,685 

AGOR mid life refit ................................................................................. [18,000 ] [15,000 ] 

011 0602651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH ......................................... 6,060 6,060 6,060 6,060 012 0602747N UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ...................................................... 103,050 103,050 103,050 103,050 013 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH .......................................... 169,710 169,710 169,710 169,710 014 0602782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 31,326 31,326 31,326 31,326 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 834,538 852,538 834,538 15,000 849,538 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

015 0603114N POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 48,201 48,201 48,201 48,201 016 0603123N FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 28,328 28,328 28,328 28,328 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
10 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

019 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................. 56,179 56,179 56,179 56,179 020 0603640M USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) ................................ 132,400 132,400 132,400 132,400 021 0603651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................... 11,854 11,854 11,854 11,854 022 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ......... 247,931 247,931 247,931 247,931 023 0603729N WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...................................... 4,760 4,760 4,760 4,760 025 0603758N NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS ............................ 51,463 51,463 51,463 51,463 026 0603782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ..................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 583,116 583,116 583,116 583,116 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

027 0603207N AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS ................................................................ 42,246 42,246 42,246 42,246 028 0603216N AVIATION SURVIVABILITY .................................................................................. 5,591 5,591 5,591 5,591 029 0603237N DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL ................................................ 3,262 3,262 3,262 3,262 030 0603251N AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 74 74 74 74 031 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 7,964 7,964 7,964 7,964 032 0603261N TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE .......................................................... 5,257 5,257 5,257 5,257 033 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY ................................................... 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 034 0603502N SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES ........................... 168,040 168,040 168,040 168,040 035 0603506N SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE .................................................................. 88,649 88,649 88,649 88,649 036 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 83,902 83,902 83,902 83,902 037 0603525N PILOT FISH ........................................................................................................ 108,713 108,713 108,713 108,713 038 0603527N RETRACT LARCH ............................................................................................... 9,316 9,316 9,316 9,316 039 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER ............................................................................................ 77,108 77,108 77,108 77,108 040 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL .................................................................................. 762 762 762 762 041 0603553N SURFACE ASW .................................................................................................. 2,349 2,349 2,349 2,349 042 0603561N ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 852,977 874,977 852,977 852,977 

Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Development ......................................... [22,000 ] 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
11 

043 0603562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS ..................................................... 8,764 8,764 8,764 8,764 044 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN .................................................................. 20,501 20,501 20,501 20,501 045 0603564N SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES ....................................... 27,052 27,052 27,052 27,052 046 0603570N ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ........................................................... 428,933 428,933 428,933 428,933 047 0603573N ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS .................................................... 27,154 27,154 27,154 –4,252 22,902 

Program execution .................................................................................. [–4,252 ] 

048 0603576N CHALK EAGLE ................................................................................................... 519,140 519,140 519,140 519,140 

049 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) ......................................................................... 406,389 406,389 406,389 406,389 050 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ....................................................................... 36,570 36,570 36,570 –18,040 18,530 

Late contract awards .............................................................................. [–18,040 ] 

051 0603609N CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS .............................................................................. 8,404 8,404 8,404 8,404 

052 0603611M MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES ................................................................ 136,967 136,967 136,967 –14,000 122,967 

Program delay ......................................................................................... [–14,000 ] 

053 0603635M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM ..................................... 1,489 1,489 1,489 1,489 054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ................................... 38,422 38,422 38,422 38,422 055 0603658N COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................ 69,312 69,312 69,312 –5,300 64,012 

Common array block antenna contract delay ........................................ [–5,300 ] 

056 0603713N OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 9,196 9,196 9,196 9,196 057 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ......................................................................... 18,850 18,850 18,850 18,850 

058 0603724N NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM ................................................................................. 45,618 45,618 45,618 45,618 059 0603725N FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT ................................................................................ 3,019 3,019 3,019 3,019 060 0603734N CHALK CORAL ................................................................................................... 144,951 144,951 144,951 144,951 061 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY ......................................................................... 5,797 5,797 5,797 5,797 062 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE ............................................................................................... 308,131 308,131 308,131 308,131 063 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA ................................................................................................. 195,189 195,189 195,189 195,189 064 0603751N RETRACT ELM ................................................................................................... 56,358 56,358 56,358 56,358 065 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN .............................................................................................. 55,378 55,378 55,378 55,378 066 0603787N SPECIAL PROCESSES ........................................................................................ 48,842 48,842 48,842 48,842 067 0603790N NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 7,509 7,509 7,509 7,509

068 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................. 5,075 5,075 5,075 –5,075 0 

Early to need ........................................................................................... [–5,075 ] 

069 0603851M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING ............................................................ 51,178 51,178 51,178 51,178 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
12 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

070 0603860N JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL .................. 205,615 205,615 205,615 –10,896 194,719 

JPALS 1B follow-on platform integration delay ...................................... [–7,437 ] JPALS 1B test early to need ................................................................... [–3,459 ] 

072 0604272N TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) ........ 37,227 37,227 37,227 37,227 073 0604279N ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION ............................................................. 169 169 169 169 074 0604653N JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW) ... 20,874 10,874 20,874 –3,000 17,874 

Schedule delay ........................................................................................ [–10,000 ] [–3,000 ] 

075 0604659N PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ................................. 2,257 2,257 2,257 2,257 076 0604707N SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING 

SUPPORT.

38,327 38,327 38,327 38,327 

077 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT ........................ 135,985 135,985 35,985 –30,000 105,985 

Adjust program to more realistic schedule ............................................ [–100,000 ] [–30,000 ] 

078 0605812M JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING 

DEVELOPMENT PH.

50,362 50,362 50,362 50,362 

079 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP ............................................................... 8,448 8,448 8,448 –3,540 4,908 

Program delay ......................................................................................... [–3,540 ] 

080 0304270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP .................................................. 153 153 153 153 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ......... 4,641,385 4,653,385 4,541,385 –94,103 4,547,282 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

081 0604212N OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 40,558 40,558 40,558 40,558 082 0604214N AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV ........................................................................... 35,825 35,825 35,825 –2,500 33,325 

Excess program management ................................................................ [–2,500 ] 

083 0604215N STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................. 99,891 99,891 99,891 99,891 

084 0604216N MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT ................................... 17,565 17,565 17,565 17,565 085 0604218N AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING ............................................................. 4,026 4,026 4,026 4,026 086 0604221N P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ...................................................................... 1,791 1,791 1,791 1,791 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
13 

087 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM ............................................................................ 11,725 11,725 11,725 11,725 088 0604231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM .......................................................................... 68,463 68,463 68,463 68,463 089 0604234N ADVANCED HAWKEYE ........................................................................................ 152,041 152,041 152,041 152,041 090 0604245N H–1 UPGRADES ................................................................................................ 47,123 47,123 47,123 47,123 091 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS ........................................................................... 30,208 30,208 30,208 30,208 092 0604262N V–22A ............................................................................................................... 43,084 43,084 43,084 43,084 093 0604264N AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ................................................................ 11,401 11,401 11,401 11,401 094 0604269N EA–18 ............................................................................................................... 11,138 11,138 11,138 11,138 095 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 34,964 34,964 34,964 34,964 096 0604273N VH–71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT ....................................................... 94,238 94,238 94,238 94,238 097 0604274N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) ................................................................... 257,796 257,796 257,796 257,796 098 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) ..................................... 3,302 3,302 3,302 3,302 099 0604307N SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING .................................. 240,298 240,298 240,298 240,298 100 0604311N LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ........................................................... 1,214 1,214 1,214 1,214101 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) ........................................................................ 46,007 46,007 46,007 46,007 102 0604366N STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................ 75,592 75,592 75,592 75,592 103 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM ................................................................................................ 117,854 117,854 117,854 117,854 104 0604376M MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

FOR AVIATION.

10,080 10,080 10,080 10,080 

105 0604378N NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 21,413 21,413 21,413 21,413 106 0604404N UNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE 

(UCLASS) SYSTEM.

146,683 146,683 146,683 –13,000 133,683 

Schedule delay ........................................................................................ [–13,000 ] 

107 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS ............................................................... 275,871 275,871 275,871 –79,800 196,071 

Air and missile defense radar contract delay ....................................... [–79,800 ] 

108 0604503N SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION ........................................................ 89,672 89,672 89,672 89,672 

109 0604504N AIR CONTROL ................................................................................................... 13,754 13,754 13,754 13,754 110 0604512N SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 69,615 69,615 69,615 69,615 112 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN ............................................................................................. 121,566 121,566 121,566 121,566 113 0604562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM ....................................................... 49,143 49,143 49,143 49,143 114 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E ........................................................ 155,254 155,254 175,254 20,000 175,254 

Increased LHA–8 design efforts ............................................................. [20,000 ] [20,000 ] 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
14 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

115 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES ......................................................... 3,689 3,689 3,689 3,689 116 0604601N MINE DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................ 5,041 5,041 5,041 5,041 117 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT ........................................................... 26,444 26,444 26,444 26,444 118 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ................................... 8,897 8,897 8,897 8,897 119 0604703N PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS .......................... 6,233 6,233 6,233 6,233 120 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS ................................................................ 442 442 442 442 121 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) ..................................................... 130,360 130,360 130,360 130,360 122 0604756N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) ..................................................... 50,209 50,209 50,209 50,209 123 0604757N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) ................................................ 164,799 164,799 164,799 –50,000 114,799 

SEWIP block 3 program delay ................................................................ [–50,000 ] 

124 0604761N INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING ............................................................................ 1,984 1,984 1,984 1,984 

125 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 9,458 9,458 9,458 9,458 126 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM .................................................................................... 51,430 51,430 51,430 51,430 127 0604800M JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD ................................................................. 512,631 512,631 512,631 –10,000 502,631 

F–35B follow-on development ahead of need ....................................... [–10,000 ] 

128 0604800N JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD ................................................................. 534,187 534,187 534,187 –10,000 524,187 

F–35B follow-on development ahead of need ....................................... [–10,000 ] 

129 0605013M INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 5,564 5,564 5,564 5,564 130 0605013N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 69,659 69,659 69,659 –6,836 62,823 

Unjustified request ................................................................................. [–6,836 ] 

132 0605212N CH–53K RDTE ................................................................................................... 503,180 503,180 503,180 503,180 

133 0605450N JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) ........................................................... 5,500 5,500 5,500 –5,500 0 

Program uncertainty ............................................................................... [–5,500 ] 

134 0605500N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) ................................................... 317,358 317,358 317,358 –30,000 287,358 

P–8A spiral 2 development milestone B slip ........................................ [–30,000 ] 

135 0204202N DDG–1000 ........................................................................................................ 187,910 187,910 187,910 187,910 

136 0304231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP ................................................................ 2,140 2,140 2,140 2,140


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
15 

137 0304785N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS ................................................................... 9,406 9,406 9,406 9,406 138 0305124N SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM ................................................................... 22,800 22,800 22,800 22,800 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ............................. 5,028,476 5,028,476 5,048,476 –187,636 4,840,840 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

139 0604256N THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 43,261 43,261 43,261 43,261 140 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 71,872 71,872 71,872 71,872 141 0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ................................................................................. 38,033 38,033 38,033 38,033 142 0605126N JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION ............................ 1,352 1,352 1,352 1,352 143 0605152N STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY ...................................................... 5,566 5,566 5,566 5,566 144 0605154N CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES ........................................................................ 48,345 48,345 48,345 48,345 146 0605804N TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES ............................................................... 637 637 637 637 147 0605853N MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ................................. 76,585 76,585 76,585 76,585 148 0605856N STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT ..................................................................... 3,221 3,221 3,221 3,221 149 0605861N RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT ......................................... 72,725 72,725 72,725 72,725 150 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT ............................................................. 141,778 141,778 141,778 141,778 151 0605864N TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ..................................................................... 331,219 331,219 331,219 331,219 152 0605865N OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY .......................................... 16,565 16,565 16,565 16,565 153 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT ............................ 3,265 3,265 3,265 3,265 154 0605867N SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT ........................................... 7,134 7,134 7,134 7,134 155 0605873M MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT ...................................................... 24,082 24,082 24,082 24,082156 0305885N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 497 497 497 497 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............................................................ 886,137 886,137 886,137 886,137 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

159 0604227N HARPOON MODIFICATIONS ................................................................................ 699 699 699 699 160 0604402N UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND 

PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT.

20,961 40,961 20,961 20,961 

X–47B Aerial Refueling Test & Evaluation ............................................ [20,000 ] 

162 0604766M MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 35 35 35 35 163 0605525N CARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY (COD) FOLLOW ON .......................................... 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 164 0605555N STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................... 9,757 9,757 9,757 9,757 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
16 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

165 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT ............................................. 98,057 121,957 98,057 98,057 

Reentry System Applications and Strategic Guidance Applications ...... [23,900 ] 

166 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ........................................................ 31,768 31,768 31,768 31,768 167 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................ 1,464 1,464 1,464 1,464 168 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................... 21,729 21,729 21,729 21,729 169 0203761N RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) ........................................................... 13,561 13,561 13,561 13,561 170 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS ......................................................................................... 131,118 131,118 131,118 131,118 171 0204152N E–2 SQUADRONS .............................................................................................. 1,971 1,971 1,971 1,971 172 0204163N FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) ....................................................... 46,155 46,155 46,155 –11,732 34,423 

Joint Aerial Layer Network program delay .............................................. [–11,732 ] 

173 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT ........................................................................................... 2,374 2,374 2,374 2,374 

174 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) ................. 12,407 12,407 12,407 12,407 175 0204311N INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .............................................................. 41,609 41,609 41,609 41,609 176 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT) ................... 7,240 7,240 7,240 7,240 177 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) .............................................. 78,208 78,208 78,208 78,208 178 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 45,124 45,124 45,124 45,124 179 0204574N CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT ...................................................................... 2,703 2,703 2,703 2,703 180 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT ......................................... 19,563 19,563 19,563 19,563 181 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT ....................................................................................... 13,586 13,586 13,586 13,586 182 0205604N TACTICAL DATA LINKS ...................................................................................... 197,538 197,538 197,538 197,538 183 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ............................................... 31,863 31,863 31,863 31,863 184 0205632N MK–48 ADCAP .................................................................................................. 12,806 12,806 12,806 12,806 185 0205633N AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................................ 88,607 88,607 88,607 88,607 187 0205675N OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ...................................................... 116,928 116,928 116,928 116,928 188 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS .................................................. 178,753 178,753 178,753 178,753 189 0206623M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS ................... 139,594 113,794 118,719 –20,875 118,719 

Marine Personnel Carrier program deferred ........................................... [–20,800 ] [–20,875 ] [–20,875 ] 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
17 

Precision extended range munition program reduction ......................... [–5,000 ] 

190 0206624M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT ................................................. 42,647 42,647 42,647 –5,613 37,034 

Prior year carry over ............................................................................... [–5,613 ] 

191 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) ......................... 34,394 34,394 34,394 34,394 192 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................................................... 39,159 39,159 39,159 –8,000 31,159 

Program delay ......................................................................................... [–8,000 ] 

193 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) .......................... 2,613 2,613 2,613 2,613 194 0208058N JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) ................................................................... 986 986 986 986 199 0303109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) ............................................................ 66,231 66,231 66,231 66,231 

200 0303138N CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES) ............... 24,476 24,476 24,476 24,476 201 0303140N INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 23,531 23,531 23,531 23,531 206 0305160N NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOC) ................... 742 742 742 742 207 0305192N MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES ..................................... 4,804 4,804 4,804 4,804 208 0305204N TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ......................................................... 8,381 8,381 8,381 8,381 211 0305208M DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 5,535 5,535 5,535 5,535 212 0305208N DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 19,718 19,718 19,718 19,718 213 0305220N RQ–4 UAV ......................................................................................................... 375,235 375,235 375,235 375,235 214 0305231N MQ–8 UAV ........................................................................................................ 48,713 48,713 48,713 48,713 215 0305232M RQ–11 UAV ....................................................................................................... 102 102 102 102 216 0305233N RQ–7 UAV ......................................................................................................... 710 710 710 710 217 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) .................................................... 5,013 5,013 5,013 5,013 219 0305239M RQ–21A ............................................................................................................ 11,122 11,122 11,122 11,122 220 0305241N MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................. 28,851 28,851 28,851 28,851 221 0308601N MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT ............................................................ 5,116 5,116 5,116 5,116222 0702207N DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) ........................................................................ 28,042 28,042 28,042 28,042 223 0708011N INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ............................................................................ 50,933 50,933 50,933 50,933 224 0708730N MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) ............................................................... 4,998 4,998 4,998 4,998 

224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 1,185,132 1,185,132 1,185,132 1,185,132 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 3,385,822 3,403,922 3,364,947 –46,220 3,339,602 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY .................... 15,974,780 16,032,880 15,873,905 –312,959 15,661,821 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
18 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601102F DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 373,151 373,151 373,151 373,151 

002 0601103F UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ................................................................. 138,333 138,333 138,333 138,333 003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES .................................................. 13,286 13,286 13,286 13,286 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 524,770 524,770 524,770 524,770 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602102F MATERIALS ........................................................................................................ 116,846 116,846 116,846 116,846 005 0602201F AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES .............................................................. 119,672 119,672 119,672 119,672 

006 0602202F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH .................................................. 89,483 89,483 89,483 89,483 007 0602203F AEROSPACE PROPULSION ................................................................................. 197,546 197,546 197,546 197,546 008 0602204F AEROSPACE SENSORS ...................................................................................... 127,539 127,539 127,539 127,539 009 0602601F SPACE TECHNOLOGY ........................................................................................ 104,063 104,063 104,063 104,063 010 0602602F CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS .............................................................................. 81,521 81,521 81,521 81,521 011 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY .................................................................... 112,845 112,845 112,845 112,845 012 0602788F DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS ....................................... 138,161 138,161 138,161 138,161 013 0602890F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH ..................................................................... 40,217 40,217 40,217 40,217 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 1,127,893 1,127,893 1,127,893 1,127,893 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

014 0603112F ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS .............................................. 39,572 49,572 39,572 10,000 49,572 

Program increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] [10,000 ] 

015 0603199F SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) ........................................... 12,800 12,800 12,800 12,800 016 0603203F ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS ................................................................... 30,579 30,579 30,579 30,579 

017 0603211F AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO ............................................................. 77,347 77,347 77,347 77,347 018 0603216F AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY ..................................... 149,321 149,321 149,321 149,321 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
19 

019 0603270F ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY ................................................................ 49,128 49,128 49,128 49,128 020 0603401F ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY ............................................................ 68,071 68,071 68,071 68,071 021 0603444F MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) ................................................. 26,299 26,299 26,299 26,299 022 0603456F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................. 20,967 20,967 20,967 20,967 023 0603601F CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY .......................................................... 33,996 33,996 33,996 33,996 024 0603605F ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................. 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 025 0603680F MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ...................................................... 41,353 41,353 41,353 41,353 026 0603788F BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ................. 49,093 49,093 49,093 49,093 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 617,526 627,526 617,526 10,000 627,526 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

028 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................ 3,983 3,983 3,983 3,983 029 0603287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 3,874 3,874 3,874 3,874 032 0603438F SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY ........................................................................ 27,024 27,024 27,024 27,024 033 0603742F COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY ........................................................... 15,899 15,899 15,899 15,899 034 0603790F NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 4,568 4,568 4,568 4,568035 0603791F INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D ..................................................... 379 379 379 379 036 0603830F SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) .............................................................. 28,764 28,764 28,764 28,764 038 0603851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL ........................................ 86,737 86,737 86,737 86,737 040 0603859F POLLUTION PREVENTION—DEM/VAL ................................................................ 953 953 953 953 042 0604015F LONG RANGE STRIKE ........................................................................................ 379,437 379,437 379,437 379,437 044 0604317F TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER .................................................................................. 2,606 2,606 2,606 2,606 045 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM .. 103 103 103 103 047 0604337F REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION .................................................. 16,018 16,018 16,018 16,018 049 0604458F AIR & SPACE OPS CENTER .............................................................................. 58,861 58,861 58,861 58,861 050 0604618F JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ..................................................................... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 051 0604635F GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT ........................................... 21,175 21,175 21,175 21,175 052 0604857F OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE ............................................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 

Program increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] [10,000 ] 

053 0604858F TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM ........................................................................... 13,636 13,636 13,636 13,636 054 0105921F SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES .................................. 2,799 2,799 2,799 2,799 055 0207455F THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR) ..................................... 70,160 70,160 70,160 70,160 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
20 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

056 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) ........... 137,233 137,233 137,233 137,233 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ......... 876,709 876,709 886,709 10,000 886,709 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

058 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................ 977 977 977 977 061 0604233F SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING ........................................... 3,601 3,601 3,601 3,601 062 0604270F ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 1,971 1,971 1,971 1,971 064 0604281F TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE ......................................................... 51,456 51,456 36,256 51,456 

Unjustified request ................................................................................. [–15,200 ] 

065 0604287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 50 50 50 50 066 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD ............................................................ 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 

067 0604421F COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS ................................................................................ 23,930 23,930 23,930 23,930 068 0604425F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS ........................................................ 400,258 400,258 400,258 400,258 069 0604429F AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK ...................................................................... 4,575 4,575 4,575 4,575 070 0604441F SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD .................................... 352,532 372,532 352,532 –29,700 322,832 

Modernization projects execution delays excluding exploitation efforts [–29,700 ] Space Based Infrared Systems (SBIRS) Data Exploitation .................... [20,000 ] 

071 0604602F ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 16,284 16,284 16,284 16,284 

072 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS ................................................................................................. 2,564 2,564 2,564 2,564 073 0604617F AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT ................................................................................. 17,036 17,036 17,036 17,036 074 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 7,273 7,273 7,273 7,273 075 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING RANGES ............................................................................. 33,200 33,200 33,200 33,200 078 0604800F F–35—EMD ...................................................................................................... 816,335 816,335 816,335 816,335 079 0604851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—EMD ............................................... 145,442 145,442 145,442 145,442 080 0604853F EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD ............. 27,963 27,963 27,963 27,963 081 0604932F LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON .................................................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 082 0604933F ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION ............................................................................ 129,411 129,411 129,411 129,411 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
21 

083 0605213F F–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B ......................................................... 131,100 131,100 131,100 131,100 084 0605221F KC–46 ............................................................................................................... 1,558,590 1,558,590 1,558,590 1,558,590 085 0605229F CSAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION ..................................................................... 393,558 393,558 393,558 –60,000 333,558 

Program delays / projected savings pending updated program estimate. [–60,000 ] 

086 0605278F HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E .............................................................................. 6,242 6,242 6,242 6,242 087 0605431F ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) .............................................................. 272,872 272,872 272,872 272,872 088 0605432F POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) ............................................................................ 124,805 124,805 124,805 124,805 089 0605433F WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) .............................................................. 13,948 13,948 13,948 13,948 090 0605931F B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .......................................................... 303,500 303,500 303,500 303,500 091 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 67,874 67,874 67,874 67,874 094 0207701F FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING .................................................................... 4,663 4,663 4,663 4,663 097 0401318F CV–22 ............................................................................................................... 46,705 46,705 46,705 46,705 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ............................. 5,078,715 5,098,715 5,063,515 –89,700 4,989,015 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

099 0604256F THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 17,690 17,690 17,690 17,690 100 0604759F MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ................................................................................. 34,841 34,841 34,841 34,841 101 0605101F RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE .............................................................................. 32,956 32,956 32,956 32,956 103 0605712F INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION ..................................................... 13,610 13,610 13,610 13,610 104 0605807F TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ..................................................................... 742,658 742,658 742,658 742,658 105 0605860F ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) ............................................... 14,203 14,203 14,203 14,203 106 0605864F SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) ........................................................................... 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 107 0605976F FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION 

SUPPORT.

44,160 44,160 44,160 44,160 

108 0605978F FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ........................ 27,643 27,643 27,643 27,643 109 0606323F MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE ........................................ 13,935 13,935 13,935 13,935 110 0606392F SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE ............................ 192,348 192,348 192,348 192,348 111 0702806F ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..................................................... 28,647 28,647 28,647 28,647112 0804731F GENERAL SKILL TRAINING ................................................................................ 315 315 315 315 114 1001004F INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES .............................................................................. 3,785 3,785 3,785 3,785 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............................................................ 1,179,791 1,179,791 1,179,791 1,179,791 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
22 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

115 0603423F GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT .......... 383,500 383,500 383,500 383,500 117 0604445F WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE .............................................................................. 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 

118 0605018F AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS) .............................. 90,097 90,097 90,097 90,097 119 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY ............................................ 32,086 32,086 32,086 32,086 121 0101113F B–52 SQUADRONS ........................................................................................... 24,007 24,007 24,007 24,007 122 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) ......................................................... 450 450 450 450 123 0101126F B–1B SQUADRONS ........................................................................................... 19,589 19,589 19,589 19,589 124 0101127F B–2 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................. 100,194 100,194 100,194 100,194 125 0101313F STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM .............................................. 37,448 37,448 37,448 37,448 128 0102326F REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 130 0203761F WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS (WRAP) RAPID TRANSITION 

FUND.

3,844 3,844 3,844 3,844 

131 0205219F MQ–9 UAV ........................................................................................................ 128,328 128,328 128,328 128,328 133 0207131F A–10 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................ 9,614 9,614 9,614 9,614 134 0207133F F–16 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................ 177,298 177,298 177,298 177,298 135 0207134F F–15E SQUADRONS .......................................................................................... 244,289 244,289 244,289 244,289 136 0207136F MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION ............................................................. 13,138 13,138 13,138 13,138 137 0207138F F–22A SQUADRONS .......................................................................................... 328,542 328,542 328,542 328,542 138 0207142F F–35 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................ 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 139 0207161F TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................................................... 15,460 15,460 15,460 15,460 140 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) .......................... 84,172 84,172 84,172 84,172 142 0207224F COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY ................................................................... 2,582 2,582 2,582 2,582 143 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE .................................................................... 542 542 542 542 144 0207247F AF TENCAP ....................................................................................................... 89,816 89,816 13,016 89,816 

Reduction fighter communications POD ................................................. [–76,800 ] 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
23 

145 0207249F PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT ................................................. 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 146 0207253F COMPASS CALL ................................................................................................ 10,782 10,782 10,782 10,782 147 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............................. 139,369 139,369 139,369 139,369 149 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) ....................................... 6,373 6,373 6,373 6,373 150 0207410F AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) ...................................................... 22,820 22,820 22,820 22,820 151 0207412F CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) ...................................................... 7,029 7,029 7,029 7,029 152 0207417F AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) ................................... 186,256 186,256 186,256 186,256 153 0207418F TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS ........................................................ 743 743 743 743 156 0207431F COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES ............................................. 4,471 4,471 4,471 4,471 158 0207444F TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD ............................................................... 10,250 10,250 10,250 10,250 159 0207448F C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK ............................................................................. 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 160 0207449F COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION ............................................. 7,329 7,329 7,329 7,329 161 0207452F DCAPES ............................................................................................................. 15,081 15,081 15,081 15,081 162 0207581F JOINT SURVEILLANCE/TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM (JSTARS) ................... 13,248 13,248 23,148 9,900 23,148 

Continue T–3 testing operations ............................................................ [9,900 ] [9,900 ] 

163 0207590F SEEK EAGLE ...................................................................................................... 24,342 24,342 24,342 24,342 164 0207601F USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION .................................................................. 10,448 10,448 10,448 10,448 165 0207605F WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS ......................................................... 5,512 5,512 5,512 5,512 166 0207697F DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES ......................................................... 3,301 3,301 3,301 3,301167 0208006F MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS .......................................................................... 62,605 62,605 62,605 62,605 169 0208059F CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES .......................................................................... 68,099 68,099 68,099 68,099 170 0208087F AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS ....................................................... 14,047 14,047 14,047 14,047 171 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS ....................................................... 5,853 5,853 5,853 5,853 179 0301400F SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE ................................................................. 12,197 12,197 12,197 12,197 180 0302015F E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) .............................. 18,267 18,267 18,267 18,267 181 0303131F MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) .... 36,288 36,288 36,288 36,288 182 0303140F INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 90,231 90,231 100,231 10,000 100,231 

ASACoE program ..................................................................................... [10,000 ] [10,000 ] 

183 0303141F GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 725 725 725 725 185 0303601F MILSATCOM TERMINALS ................................................................................... 140,170 140,170 140,170 140,170 

187 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE ........................................................................ 117,110 117,110 117,110 117,110 190 0305099F GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) ................................................... 4,430 4,430 4,430 4,430 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
24 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

191 0305103F CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 2,048 2,048 2,048 2,048 192 0305105F DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER ............................................................................ 288 288 288 288 193 0305110F SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) .......................................................... 35,698 35,698 35,698 35,698 194 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE ........................................................................................... 24,667 24,667 24,667 24,667 195 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS) ............ 35,674 35,674 35,674 35,674 196 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS .............................................................................................. 21,186 21,186 21,186 21,186 199 0305128F SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES ....................................................... 195 195 195 195 200 0305145F ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................... 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 201 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ........................................ 330 330 330 330 206 0305173F SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER ..................................... 3,696 3,696 3,696 3,696 207 0305174F SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 2,469 2,469 2,469 2,469 208 0305179F INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) ......................................................... 8,289 8,289 8,289 8,289209 0305182F SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) ................................................................ 13,345 13,345 13,345 13,345 211 0305202F DRAGON U–2 .................................................................................................... 18,700 18,700 18,700 18,700 212 0305205F ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ..................................................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 213 0305206F AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS .......................................................... 37,828 37,828 50,328 12,500 50,328 

Blue Devil Replacement WAMI/NVDF ...................................................... [15,000 ] [12,500 ] Unjustified amount ................................................................................. [–2,500 ] 

214 0305207F MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS ............................................................. 13,491 13,491 13,491 13,491 

215 0305208F DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 7,498 7,498 7,498 7,498 216 0305219F MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV .................................................................................. 3,326 3,326 3,326 3,326 217 0305220F RQ–4 UAV ........................................................................................................ 134,406 134,406 134,406 –20,000 114,406 

Multiple execution delays ....................................................................... [–20,000 ] 

218 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING ............................................ 7,413 7,413 7,413 7,413 219 0305236F COMMON DATA LINK (CDL) .............................................................................. 40,503 40,503 40,503 40,503 220 0305238F NATO AGS ......................................................................................................... 264,134 264,134 264,134 264,134 221 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE ...................................................................... 23,016 23,016 23,016 23,016 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
25 

222 0305265F GPS III SPACE SEGMENT .................................................................................. 221,276 221,276 221,276 221,276 223 0305614F JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM .................................................................................. 58,523 58,523 58,523 58,523 224 0305881F RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION .............................................................................. 2,218 2,218 2,218 2,218 226 0305913F NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) ............................................................... 50,547 50,547 50,547 50,547 227 0305940F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS ................................................... 18,807 18,807 18,807 18,807229 0308699F SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW) ...................................................................... 1,079 1,079 1,079 1,079 230 0401115F C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON .............................................................................. 400 26,400 400 73,300 73,700 

C–130 AMP ............................................................................................. [47,300 ] C–130H Propulsion System Propeller Upgrades ..................................... [26,000 ] [26,000 ] 

231 0401119F C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) .......................................................................... 61,492 61,492 61,492 61,492 

232 0401130F C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) ......................................................................................... 109,134 109,134 109,134 109,134 233 0401132F C–130J PROGRAM ............................................................................................ 22,443 22,443 22,443 22,443 234 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) ....................................... 4,116 4,116 4,116 4,116 238 0401314F OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT ...................................................................... 44,553 44,553 44,553 44,553 239 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL ............................................................ 6,213 6,213 6,213 6,213 

240 0702207F DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) ........................................................................ 1,605 1,605 1,605 1,605 242 0708610F LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) .............................................. 95,238 95,238 95,238 95,238 243 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 10,925 10,925 10,925 10,925 244 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING .................................................................................. 1,347 1,347 1,347 1,347 245 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 65 65 65 65 246 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY ........................................................... 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 247 0901218F CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM ................................................................ 1,577 1,577 1,577 1,577 248 0901220F PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................... 5,990 5,990 5,990 5,990 249 0901226F AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY .................................................. 786 786 786 786 250 0901279F FACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE ....................................................... 654 654 654 654 251 0901538F FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................. 135,735 135,735 135,735 135,735 

252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 11,874,528 11,894,528 11,874,528 11,874,528 

Increase to classified program ............................................................... [70,000 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [20,000 ] Reduction to classified program ............................................................ [–70,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 16,297,542 16,343,542 16,253,142 85,700 16,383,242 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
26 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF ........................ 25,702,946 25,778,946 25,653,346 16,000 25,718,946 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE .................................................................. 45,837 45,837 45,837 45,837 

002 0601101E DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 315,033 315,033 315,033 315,033 003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES .......................................................................... 11,171 11,171 11,171 11,171 004 0601117E BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE ....................................... 49,500 49,500 49,500 49,500 005 0601120D8Z NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM ..................................................... 84,271 89,271 84,271 84,271 

Restore PK–12 funding ........................................................................... [5,000 ] 

006 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS 30,895 35,895 30,895 5,000 35,895 

Program increase .................................................................................... [5,000 ] [5,000 ] 

007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 51,426 51,426 51,426 51,426 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 588,133 598,133 588,133 5,000 593,133 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................... 20,065 13,565 20,065 20,065 

Decrease to insensitive munitions program ........................................... [–6,500 ] 

009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................... 114,790 114,790 114,790 114,790 

011 0602234D8Z LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM ................................................. 46,875 46,875 41,875 –5,000 41,875 

MIT LL reduction ..................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

013 0602251D8Z APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES ................. 45,000 45,000 30,000 –5,000 40,000 

PSC S&T reduction .................................................................................. [–15,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

014 0602303E INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY .......................................... 413,260 413,260 418,260 2,500 415,760 

Plan X increase ....................................................................................... [5,000 ] [2,500 ] 

015 0602304E COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS .................................................................... 16,330 16,330 16,330 16,330 

017 0602383E BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE ...................................................................... 24,537 24,537 24,537 24,537 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
27 

018 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 227,065 217,065 227,065 –10,000 217,065 

Program decrease ................................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

020 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH ........................................................................... 18,908 18,908 18,908 18,908 

Assuring effective missions .................................................................... [–2,000 ] Automated software analysis tools ........................................................ [2,000 ] 

021 0602670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) APPLIED RESEARCH. 5,000 2,500 2,500 

HSCB Apl Res extension ......................................................................... [5,000 ] [2,500 ] 

022 0602702E TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................... 225,977 225,977 225,977 225,977 

023 0602715E MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY ..................................................... 166,654 166,654 166,654 166,654 024 0602716E ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................. 243,469 243,469 243,469 243,469 025 0602718BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES ............................ 175,282 175,282 175,282 175,282 026 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH ...................... 11,107 11,107 11,107 11,107 027 1160401BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 29,246 29,246 29,246 29,246 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 1,778,565 1,762,065 1,768,565 –15,000 1,763,565 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

028 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................... 26,646 26,646 26,646 –5,000 21,646 

Program decrease ................................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

029 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ................................................................... 19,420 19,920 19,420 19,420 

Program increase for future information operations strategy ............... [500 ] 

030 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT ............................................ 77,792 77,792 60,792 77,792 

Reduction due to redundancy ................................................................. [–17,000 ] 

031 0603160BR COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND 

DEFEAT.

274,033 274,033 274,033 274,033 

032 0603175C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ..................................................... 309,203 239,203 279,203 –95,000 214,203 

Advanced Technology—unsustainable growth ....................................... [–25,000 ] [–20,000 ] Common Kill VehicleTechnology—transfer to line 032X ....................... [–70,000 ] [–70,000 ] Directed energy—DPALS ......................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

032X 0603XXXC COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 70,000 100,000 100,000

Common Kill Vehicle Technology—transfer from line 032 .................... [70,000 ] [70,000 ] Increase for CKVT design and development .......................................... [30,000 ] 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
28 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

034 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .............................. 19,305 19,305 19,305 19,305 035 0603264S AGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY. 7,565 7,565 7,565 7,565 036 0603274C SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY ......................................................... 40,426 40,426 40,426 40,426037 0603286E ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS .................................................................... 149,804 149,804 149,804 149,804 038 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 172,546 172,546 172,546 172,546 039 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT. 170,847 170,847 170,847 170,847 040 0603618D8Z JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 9,009 9,009 9,009 9,009 041 0603648D8Z JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS ........................................ 174,428 167,428 164,428 –7,000 167,428 

Decrease to Strategic Capabilities Office efforts .................................. [–7,000 ] [–10,000 ] [–7,000 ] 

042 0603662D8Z NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES ................................................ 20,000 20,000 5,000 –15,000 5,000 

Net Comm reduction ............................................................................... [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] 

045 0603668D8Z CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH ........................................................ 19,668 19,668 19,668 19,668 

Assuring effective missions .................................................................... [–3,000 ] Automated software analysis tools ........................................................ [3,000 ] 

046 0603670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) ADVANCED 

DEVELOPMENT.

5,000 2,500 2,500 

HSCB Adv Dev extension ........................................................................ [5,000 ] [2,500 ] 

047 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ...... 34,041 34,041 59,041 25,000 59,041 

IBIF .......................................................................................................... [25,000 ] [25,000 ] 

048 0603699D8Z EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 61,971 53,971 61,971 –8,000 53,971 

Decrease to Strategic Capabilities Office efforts .................................. [–8,000 ] [–8,000 ] 

050 0603712S GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS ............................ 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 051 0603713S DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY ......................... 30,256 30,256 30,256 30,256 052 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM ........................................ 72,324 72,324 72,324 72,324 053 0603720S MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT .................. 82,700 82,700 82,700 82,700 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
29 

054 0603727D8Z JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM ........................................................................ 8,431 8,431 8,431 8,431 055 0603739E ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES ....................................................... 117,080 117,080 117,080 117,080 057 0603760E COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ................................. 239,078 239,078 239,078 239,078 059 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ................................................... 259,006 259,006 259,006 259,006 060 0603767E SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ...................................................................................... 286,364 286,364 286,364 286,364 061 0603769SE DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................. 12,116 12,116 12,116 12,116 062 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE ................................................................ 19,008 19,008 19,008 19,008 063 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS .............................................................. 78,532 78,532 58,532 –10,000 68,532 

Quick & Rapid Reaction Fund reduction ................................................ [–20,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

065 0603828J JOINT EXPERIMENTATION .................................................................................. 12,667 12,667 12,667 12,667 

066 0603832D8Z DOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE ................................ 41,370 41,370 41,370 41,370 069 0603941D8Z TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ............................................... 92,508 92,508 92,508 92,508

070 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT ......................................... 52,001 60,001 52,001 52,001 

Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund ................................. [8,000 ] 

071 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS ............................................................................................... 52,053 52,053 55,053 3,000 55,053 

Program increase .................................................................................... [3,000 ] [3,000 ] 

072 1160402BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ..................... 46,809 46,809 46,809 46,809 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 3,109,007 3,102,507 3,050,007 –9,500 3,099,507 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES 

075 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E 

ADC&P.

63,641 63,641 63,641 63,641 

076 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH ............................................................................................... 19,152 19,152 19,152 19,152 077 0603600D8Z WALKOFF ........................................................................................................... 70,763 70,763 70,763 70,763 079 0603714D8Z ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM ................................................. 17,230 17,230 19,230 2,000 19,230 

Sustain testing effort ............................................................................. [2,000 ] [2,000 ] 

080 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ................ 71,453 71,453 71,453 71,453 081 0603881C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT .......................... 268,990 268,990 268,990 268,990 082 0603882C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT ....................... 1,033,903 1,174,303 1,033,903 100,000 1,133,903 

Continue activities relative to site evaluation, EIS, and planning ....... [20,400 ] [20,000 ] FTG-07 failure review board and return to flight .................................. [80,000 ] Planning and Design (35% to 100% design) ....................................... [50,000 ] 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
30 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

RDT&E Ground Systems Development .................................................... [70,000 ] 

083 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL ......................... 196,237 196,237 196,237 196,237 084 0603884C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS ........................................................... 315,183 315,183 345,183 80,000 395,183 

Additional homeland missile defense radar .......................................... [30,000 ] [30,000 ] Enhanced discrimination capability ....................................................... [50,000 ] 

086 0603890C BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS ............................................................................. 377,605 377,605 377,605 377,605 

087 0603891C SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA ............................................................................. 286,613 286,613 286,613 286,613 088 0603892C AEGIS BMD ....................................................................................................... 937,056 937,056 937,056 937,056 089 0603893C SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .................................................. 44,947 44,947 44,947 44,947 090 0603895C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS .............................. 6,515 6,515 6,515 6,515 091 0603896C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI. 418,355 418,355 418,355 418,355 092 0603898C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT ............................ 47,419 47,419 47,419 47,419 093 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC) ................. 52,131 52,131 52,131 52,131 094 0603906C REGARDING TRENCH ........................................................................................ 13,864 13,864 13,864 13,864 095 0603907C SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) ................................................................... 44,478 44,478 44,478 44,478 096 0603913C ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS .................................................................. 95,782 283,782 245,782 188,000 283,782 

Arrow Weapon System Improvements ..................................................... [30,000 ] [33,700 ] Arrow–3 Interceptor ................................................................................ [20,000 ] [22,100 ] David’s Sling short-range BMD .............................................................. [100,000 ] [117,200 ] Increase Israeli Cooperative Programs ................................................... [173,000 ] US co-production capability for Iron Dome parts and components ...... [15,000 ] [15,000 ] 

097 0603914C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST .................................................................. 375,866 375,866 375,866 375,866 

098 0603915C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS ............................................................ 495,257 495,257 495,257 495,257 099 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN DEMINING ................................................................................ 11,704 11,704 11,704 11,704 100 0603923D8Z COALITION WARFARE ........................................................................................ 9,842 9,842 9,842 9,842 101 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM ......................................... 3,312 13,312 3,312 10,000 13,312


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
31 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ....................................... [10,000 ] [10,000 ] 

102 0604250D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES .......................................................... 130,000 25,000 100,000 –30,000 100,000 

Decrease to SCO efforts ......................................................................... [–105,000 ] [–30,000 ] [–30,000 ] 

103 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) 

COMMON DEVELOPMENT.

8,300 8,300 8,300 8,300 

104 0604445J WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE .............................................................................. 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 105 0604670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) RESEARCH 

AND ENGINEERING.

5,000 2,500 2,500 

HSCB Modeling R&E extension ............................................................... [5,000 ] [2,500 ] 

106 0604775D8Z DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM .......................................................... 250,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 

Rapid Innovation Program ...................................................................... [250,000 ] [150,000 ] [200,000 ] 

108 0604787J JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION .......................................................................... 7,402 7,402 7,402 7,402 

110 0604828J JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM ............................... 7,506 7,506 7,506 7,506 111 0604880C LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) ........................................................................... 129,374 129,374 129,374 129,374 112 0604881C AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT ..................................................... 308,522 308,522 308,522 308,522 115 0303191D8Z JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM ................................ 3,169 3,169 3,169 3,169 116 0305103C CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 946 946 946 946 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES ..... 5,902,517 6,385,917 6,209,517 552,500 6,455,017 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 

118 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD 8,155 8,155 8,155 8,155 119 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 65,440 65,440 65,440 65,440 120 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD ................................ 451,306 451,306 451,306 451,306 122 0604764K ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO) ......................... 29,138 29,138 29,138 29,138 123 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) ....................... 19,475 19,475 19,475 19,475 124 0605000BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES ............................... 12,901 12,901 12,901 12,901 125 0605013BL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 13,812 13,812 13,812 13,812

126 0605021SE HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE ................................................. 386 386 386 386 127 0605022D8Z DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM ................................................................ 3,763 3,763 3,763 3,763 128 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES ........................................................... 6,788 6,788 6,788 6,788 129 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ................ 27,917 27,917 27,917 27,917 130 0605075D8Z DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION .................................................................... 22,297 22,297 22,297 22,297 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
32 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

131 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM .............................. 51,689 51,689 51,689 51,689 132 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES ............................ 6,184 6,184 6,184 6,184 133 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 12,083 12,083 12,083 12,083 134 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) ..................... 3,302 3,302 3,302 3,302 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ......................... 734,636 734,636 734,636 734,636 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

135 0604774D8Z DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) ......................................... 6,393 6,393 6,393 6,393 136 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT .............................................. 2,479 2,479 2,479 2,479 137 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP) .......... 240,213 240,213 240,213 240,213 138 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS ................................................................... 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 139 0604943D8Z THERMAL VICAR ............................................................................................... 8,287 8,287 8,287 8,287 140 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) ............................... 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 141 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS ............................................... 24,379 24,379 24,379 24,379 143 0605117D8Z FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION ..................................... 54,311 54,311 54,311 54,311 144 0605126J JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO) ....... 47,462 47,462 47,462 47,462 146 0605130D8Z FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING ..................................................................... 12,134 12,134 12,134 12,134 147 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ................................................................................... 44,237 44,237 39,237 44,237 

SE transfer to DT&E ............................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

148 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD ........................................................ 5,871 5,871 5,871 5,871 149 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY ........................................................ 5,028 5,028 5,028 5,028

150 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION ............................. 6,301 6,301 6,301 6,301 151 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) ................................................... 6,504 6,504 6,504 6,504 152 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 92,046 92,046 92,046 92,046 158 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (S. 1,868 1,868 1,868 1,868 

159 0605798D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS .................................................................... 8,362 8,362 8,362 8,362 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
33 

160 0605801KA DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) ....................................... 56,024 56,024 46,024 56,024 

DTIC reduction ........................................................................................ [–10,000 ] 

161 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION .............. 6,908 6,908 6,908 6,908 162 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION ............................................................ 15,451 19,451 20,451 4,000 19,451 

DT&E transfer from SE ........................................................................... [5,000 ] Program increase .................................................................................... [4,000 ] [4,000 ] 

164 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................................................. 71,659 71,659 71,659 71,659 

165 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS ........................................................... 4,083 4,083 4,083 4,083

167 0203345D8Z DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI) ........................................ 5,306 5,306 5,306 5,306 168 0204571J JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT ................................................................. 2,097 2,097 2,097 2,097 172 0303166J SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES ........................... 8,394 8,394 8,394 8,394 175 0305193D8Z CYBER INTELLIGENCE ...................................................................................... 7,624 7,624 7,624 7,624 178 0804767D8Z COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2) 43,247 43,247 43,247 43,247 179 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA ................................................................................. 37,712 37,712 37,712 37,712 180 0901598D8W MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS WHS ................................................................ 607 607 607 607 

181A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 54,914 54,914 54,914 54,914 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............................................................ 913,028 917,028 903,028 4,000 917,028 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 

182 0604130V ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) ............................................................ 7,552 7,552 7,552 7,552 183 0605127T REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE 

INFORMATION MANA.

3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 

184 0605147T OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM 

(OHASIS).

287 287 287 287 

185 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT ............................. 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 186 0607310D8Z OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ........................................................... 1,955 1,955 1,955 1,955 187 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 

SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS).

13,250 13,250 13,250 13,250 

188 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT). 13,026 13,026 13,026 13,026 190 0607828J JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ................................................... 12,652 12,652 12,652 12,652 191 0208043J PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) ................................................ 3,061 3,061 3,061 3,061 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
34 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

192 0208045K C4I INTEROPERABILITY ..................................................................................... 72,726 72,726 72,726 72,726 194 0301144K JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING ............................................ 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 201 0302016K NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT ................................ 512 512 512 512 202 0302019K DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION ............... 12,867 12,867 12,867 12,867 203 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS ............................................................. 36,565 36,565 36,565 36,565 204 0303131K MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) .... 13,144 13,144 13,144 13,144 205 0303135G PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) ............................................................... 1,060 1,060 1,060 1,060 206 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) .................................................... 33,279 33,279 33,279 33,279207 0303140D8Z INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 10,673 10,673 10,673 10,673208 0303140G INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 181,567 179,291 181,567 181,567 

Excess to need ........................................................................................ [–2,276 ] 

210 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................................................... 34,288 34,288 34,288 34,288 211 0303153K DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION ............................................................... 7,741 7,741 7,741 7,741 

212 0303170K NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ................................................. 3,325 3,325 3,325 3,325 213 0303260D8Z DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO) .......................... 1,246 1,246 1,246 1,246 214 0303610K TELEPORT PROGRAM ........................................................................................ 5,147 5,147 5,147 5,147 216 0304210BB SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES ................................................. 17,352 17,352 17,352 17,352 220 0305103K CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 3,658 3,658 3,658 3,658 221 0305125D8Z CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP) ............................................... 9,752 9,752 9,752 9,752 225 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D PROGRAMS .................................................................................. 3,210 3,210 4,210 1,000 4,210 

CRRC extension ....................................................................................... [1,000 ] [1,000 ] 

227 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY ............................................................................................... 21,602 21,602 21,602 21,602 

230 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 5,195 5,195 5,195 5,195 233 0305208K DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348 235 0305219BB MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV .................................................................................. 641 641 641 641 238 0305387D8Z HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM .............................. 2,338 2,338 2,338 2,338 239 0305600D8Z INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES ............... 4,372 4,372 4,372 4,372 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
35 

247 0708011S INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ............................................................................ 24,691 24,691 24,691 24,691 248 0708012S LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 4,659 4,659 4,659 4,659 249 0902298J MANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS ................................................................................. 3,533 3,533 3,533 3,533 250 1105219BB MQ–9 UAV ........................................................................................................ 1,314 1,314 13,314 12,000 13,314 

Capability Improvements ........................................................................ [12,000 ] [12,000 ] 

254 1160403BB AVIATION SYSTEMS ........................................................................................... 156,561 156,561 156,561 156,561 256 1160405BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ...................... 7,705 7,705 7,705 7,705 257 1160408BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ................................................................. 42,620 42,620 42,620 42,620 261 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 17,970 17,970 17,970 17,970 262 1160432BB SPECIAL PROGRAMS ......................................................................................... 7,424 7,424 7,424 7,424 268 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES .................................................................................. 2,206 2,206 2,206 2,206 271 1160483BB MARITIME SYSTEMS ......................................................................................... 18,325 18,325 19,481 1,156 19,481 

CCFLIR—Transfer at USSOCOM Request ............................................... [1,156 ] [1,156 ] 

274 1160489BB SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES ............................................... 3,304 3,304 3,304 3,304 275 1160490BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ......................................... 16,021 16,021 16,021 16,021 

275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 3,773,704 3,773,704 3,773,704 3,773,704 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 4,641,222 4,638,946 4,655,378 14,156 4,655,378 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

276 999999999 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................ –100,000 0 

DARPA undistributed reduction .............................................................. [–100,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ......................................................................... –100,000 0 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW ....................... 17,667,108 18,139,232 17,809,264 551,156 18,218,264 

OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION .............................................................. 75,720 75,720 75,720 75,720 

002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION .................................................................... 48,423 48,423 48,423 48,423 003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES ............................................... 62,157 62,157 62,157 62,157 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............................................................ 186,300 186,300 186,300 186,300 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
36 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE ................................... 186,300 186,300 186,300 186,300 

TOTAL RDT&E ...................................................................................... 67,520,236 68,079,460 67,541,495 219,227 67,739,463 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4201.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................. 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ........................... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY ..................... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 34,426 34,426 34,426 34,426 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................. 34,426 34,426 34,426 34,426 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY ...................... 34,426 34,426 34,426 34,426 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................. 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF .......................... 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 

275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 66,208 66,208 66,208 66,208 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT .................................... 66,208 66,208 66,208 66,208 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW ......................... 66,208 66,208 66,208 66,208 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4202.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

TOTAL RDT&E ........................................................................................ 116,634 116,634 116,634 116,634 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4202.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ............................................................................................................. 888,114 1,072,714 1,084,014 171,000 1,059,114 

Missile Defense Deployment to Guam .................................................................... [13,100 ] Program decrease .................................................................................................... [–24,000 ] Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [195,500 ] [195,900 ] [171,000 ] 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ........................................................................................ 72,624 72,624 72,624 72,624 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ............................................................................................. 617,402 617,402 617,402 617,402 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ................................................................................................... 602,262 602,262 602,262 602,262 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 1,032,484 1,032,484 1,032,484 1,032,484 060 AVIATION ASSETS .............................................................................................................. 1,287,462 1,303,262 1,303,262 15,800 1,303,262 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [15,800 ] [15,800 ] [15,800 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................................................... 3,559,656 3,559,656 3,769,556 209,000 3,768,656 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [209,900 ] [209,000 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ................................................................................ 454,477 454,477 454,477 454,477 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................... 1,481,156 1,481,156 1,681,156 225,000 1,706,156 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [200,000 ] [225,000 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................................ 7,278,154 7,278,154 7,278,154 7,278,154 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 2,754,712 3,011,712 2,754,712 257,000 3,011,712 

Realignment of Arlington National Cemetary operations ....................................... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] Sustainment to 90% ............................................................................................... [282,000 ] [282,000 ] 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ........................................................................... 425,271 425,271 425,271 425,271 130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .............................................................. 185,064 185,064 180,064 185,064 

Unjustified growth ................................................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

170 COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS .......................................................... 463,270 456,594 463,270 463,270 

Realignment of SOUTHCOM Information Operations .............................................. [3,100 ] Unjustified EUCOM Growth ...................................................................................... [–9,776 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 21,102,108 21,552,832 21,718,708 877,800 21,979,908 

MOBILIZATION 

180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY ........................................................................................................ 360,240 360,240 360,240 360,240 

190 ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS ....................................................................................... 192,105 192,105 192,105 192,105 200 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ............................................................................................ 7,101 7,101 7,101 7,101 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ........................................................................................ 559,446 559,446 559,446 559,446 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

210 OFFICER ACQUISITION ....................................................................................................... 115,992 115,992 115,992 115,992 

220 RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................................................... 52,323 52,323 52,323 52,323 230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING ........................................................................................... 43,589 43,589 43,589 43,589 240 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS ................................................................ 453,745 453,745 453,745 453,745 250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................................................................... 1,034,495 1,034,495 1,034,495 1,034,495 260 FLIGHT TRAINING .............................................................................................................. 1,016,876 1,016,876 1,016,876 1,016,876 270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ...................................................................... 186,565 186,565 186,565 186,565 280 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................................................................... 652,514 652,514 652,514 652,514 290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 485,500 485,500 485,500 485,500 300 EXAMINING ........................................................................................................................ 170,912 170,912 170,912 170,912 310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................................................... 251,523 251,523 251,523 251,523 320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING ................................................................................ 184,422 184,422 184,422 184,422 330 JUNIOR ROTC .................................................................................................................... 181,105 181,105 181,105 181,105 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .................................................................. 4,829,561 4,829,561 4,829,561 4,829,561 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 690,089 690,089 690,089 690,089 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
4 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................... 774,120 779,120 774,120 774,120 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ........................................................ [5,000 ] 

370 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................... 651,765 651,765 651,765 651,765 

380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................. 453,051 453,051 453,051 453,051 390 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 487,737 487,737 487,737 487,737 400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 1,563,115 1,563,115 1,563,115 1,563,115 410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................ 326,853 326,853 326,853 326,853 420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ........................................................................................... 234,364 234,364 234,364 234,364 430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ................................................................................................ 1,212,091 1,212,091 1,212,091 1,212,091 440 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................. 243,540 243,540 243,540 243,540 450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................. 241,101 241,101 241,101 241,101 460 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................................ 226,291 226,291 226,291 226,291 470 SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS ...................................................................................... 426,651 457,851 426,651 31,200 457,851 

Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters from O&M Defense-wide [31,200 ] [31,200 ] 

480 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS ................................................................................ 27,248 24,148 27,248 27,248 

Realignment of SOUTHCOM Information Operations .............................................. [–3,100 ] 

525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................................... 1,023,946 1,023,946 1,023,946 1,023,946 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................................. 8,581,962 8,615,062 8,581,962 31,200 8,613,162 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

530 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –740,300 –284,300 –284,300 

Average civilian end strength above projection ..................................................... [–284,300 ] [–284,300 ] Unobligated balances .............................................................................................. [–456,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –740,300 –284,300 –284,300 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY ....................................................... 35,073,077 34,816,601 35,689,677 624,700 35,697,777 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
5 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ............................................................................................................. 1,621 1,621 1,621 1,621 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ........................................................................................ 24,429 24,429 24,429 24,429 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ............................................................................................. 657,099 657,099 657,099 657,099 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ................................................................................................... 122,485 122,485 122,485 122,485 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 584,058 584,058 584,058 584,058 060 AVIATION ASSETS .............................................................................................................. 79,380 79,380 79,380 79,380 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................................................... 471,616 471,616 471,616 471,616 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ................................................................................ 74,243 74,243 74,243 74,243 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................... 70,894 70,894 70,894 75,800 146,694 

Army Reserve identified shortfall—restore unjustified efficiency reduction ......... [75,800 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................................ 569,801 569,801 569,801 569,801 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 294,145 323,245 330,545 36,400 330,545 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [29,100 ] [36,400 ] [36,400 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ........................................................................... 51,853 51,853 51,853 51,853 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 3,001,624 3,030,724 3,038,024 112,200 3,113,824 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 10,735 10,735 10,735 10,735 

140 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 24,197 24,197 24,197 24,197 150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 10,304 10,304 10,304 10,304 160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................ 10,319 10,319 10,319 10,319 170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 37,857 37,857 37,857 37,857 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 93,412 93,412 93,412 93,412 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES ............................................... 3,095,036 3,124,136 3,131,436 112,200 3,207,236 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ............................................................................................................. 800,880 800,880 800,880 800,880 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ........................................................................................ 178,650 178,650 178,650 178,650 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
6 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ............................................................................................. 771,503 771,503 771,503 771,503 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ................................................................................................... 98,699 98,699 98,699 98,699 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 38,779 38,779 38,779 38,779 060 AVIATION ASSETS .............................................................................................................. 922,503 922,503 922,503 922,503 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................................................... 761,056 761,056 761,056 761,056 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ................................................................................ 62,971 62,971 62,971 62,971 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................... 233,105 233,105 233,105 233,105 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................................ 1,019,059 1,019,059 1,019,059 1,019,059 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 712,139 786,339 786,339 74,200 786,339 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [74,200 ] [74,200 ] [74,200 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ........................................................................... 1,013,715 1,013,715 1,013,715 –13,297 1,000,418 

Army National Guard identified severance pay excess to requirement ................. [–13,297 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 6,613,059 6,687,259 6,687,259 60,903 6,673,962 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 10,812 10,812 10,812 10,812 

140 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................. 1,551 1,551 1,551 1,551 150 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 78,284 78,284 78,284 78,284 160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 46,995 46,995 46,995 46,995 170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................ 6,390 6,390 6,390 6,390 180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 297,105 297,105 297,105 297,105 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 441,137 441,137 441,137 441,137 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

190 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –15,000 –15,000 

Unjustified Growth For Civilian Personnel Compensation ...................................... [–15,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –15,000 –15,000 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
7 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG ....................................................... 7,054,196 7,128,396 7,128,396 45,903 7,100,099 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ....................................................................... 4,952,522 4,952,522 4,985,022 32,500 4,985,022 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [32,500 ] [32,500 ] 

020 FLEET AIR TRAINING ......................................................................................................... 1,826,404 1,826,404 1,837,604 1,826,404 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [11,200 ] 

030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES ................................................... 38,639 38,639 38,639 38,639 

040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT .......................................................................... 90,030 90,030 90,030 90,030 050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT .................................................................................................... 362,700 362,700 362,700 362,700 060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................... 915,881 915,881 915,881 40,000 955,881 

Navy Unfunded Requirement for Air Depot Maintenance ....................................... [40,000 ] 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......................................................................... 35,838 35,838 36,446 35,838 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [608 ] 

080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ......................................................................................................... 379,914 448,414 379,914 379,914 

CLS for AVN Logistics ............................................................................................. [68,500 ] 

090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .......................................................................... 3,884,836 3,884,836 3,984,336 110,900 3,995,736 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [99,500 ] [99,500 ] Spares ...................................................................................................................... [11,400 ] 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ......................................................................... 734,852 734,852 796,252 734,852 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [61,400 ] 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 5,191,511 5,191,511 5,197,211 5,191,511 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [5,700 ] 

120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................. 1,351,274 1,351,274 1,477,474 30,000 1,381,274 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [126,200 ] [30,000 ] 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .............................................................................................. 701,316 691,722 701,316 701,316 

New START treaty implementation, excluding verification and inspection activities ...................................................................................................................... [–9,594 ] 

140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE ..................................................................................................... 97,710 97,710 97,710 97,710 150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE .............................................................................. 172,330 172,330 172,330 172,330 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
8 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

160 WARFARE TACTICS ............................................................................................................ 454,682 454,682 454,682 454,682 170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ........................................................ 328,406 328,406 328,406 328,406 180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES .............................................................................................. 946,429 946,429 946,429 136,868 1,083,297 

Navy Unfunded Requirement for Navy Expeditionary Combat Enterprise Reset/ 

Depot ................................................................................................................... [148,000 ] 

Unjustified growth for human resources functions ................................................ [–11,132 ] 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................... 142,249 148,249 142,249 142,249 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ........................................................ [6,000 ] 

200 DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT .......................................................................................... 2,603 2,603 3,263 2,603 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [660 ] 

210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .............................................................. 102,970 102,970 102,970 102,970 

220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT .................................................. 199,128 199,128 196,128 199,128 

Classified program decrease .................................................................................. [–3,000 ] 

230 CRUISE MISSILE ................................................................................................................ 92,671 92,671 92,671 92,671 

240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE ................................................................................................. 1,193,188 1,193,188 1,193,188 1,193,188 250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT ...................................................................... 105,985 105,985 105,985 105,985 260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................. 532,627 532,627 532,627 532,627 270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT ................................................................................ 304,160 304,160 304,160 304,160 280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 1,011,528 1,011,528 1,011,528 1,011,528 290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ........................................................ 1,996,821 2,182,021 2,096,821 136,000 2,132,821 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [185,200 ] [100,000 ] [136,000 ] 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 4,460,918 4,460,918 4,460,918 4,460,918 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 32,610,122 32,860,228 33,044,890 486,268 33,096,390 

MOBILIZATION 

310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE .................................................................................. 331,576 331,576 331,576 331,576 

320 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ............................................................................ 6,638 6,638 6,638 6,638 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
9 

330 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS .................................................................................... 222,752 222,752 222,752 222,752 340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS .................................................................. 73,310 73,310 73,310 73,310 350 INDUSTRIAL READINESS .................................................................................................... 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT ................................................................................................... 23,794 23,794 23,794 23,794 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ........................................................................................ 660,745 660,745 660,745 660,745 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

370 OFFICER ACQUISITION ....................................................................................................... 148,516 148,516 148,516 148,516 

380 RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................................................... 9,384 9,384 9,384 9,384 390 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS .............................................................................. 139,876 139,876 139,876 139,876 400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................................................................... 630,069 630,069 630,069 630,069 410 FLIGHT TRAINING .............................................................................................................. 9,294 9,294 9,294 9,294 420 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ...................................................................... 169,082 169,082 169,082 169,082 430 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................................................................... 164,368 164,368 164,368 164,368 440 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 241,733 242,833 241,733 1,100 242,833 

Naval Sea Cadets .................................................................................................... [1,100 ] [1,100 ] 

450 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................................................... 139,815 139,815 139,815 139,815 460 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING ................................................................................ 94,632 94,632 94,632 94,632 470 JUNIOR ROTC .................................................................................................................... 51,373 51,373 51,373 51,373 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .................................................................. 1,798,142 1,799,242 1,798,142 1,100 1,799,242 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 886,088 886,088 886,088 886,088 

490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS ....................................................................................................... 13,131 13,131 13,131 13,131 500 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ..................................................... 115,742 115,742 115,742 115,742 510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................... 382,150 382,150 382,150 382,150 520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ........................................................................................... 268,403 268,403 268,403 268,403 530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 317,293 317,293 317,293 317,293 550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 207,128 207,128 207,128 207,128 570 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ............................................................................ 295,855 295,855 295,855 295,855 580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 1,140,484 1,140,484 1,140,484 1,140,484 590 HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT .............................................................. 52,873 52,873 52,873 52,873 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
10 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

600 COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS ............................................................................................ 27,587 27,587 27,587 27,587 610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS ................................................................. 75,728 75,728 75,728 75,728 620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ........................................................................................ 543,026 543,026 543,026 543,026 680 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES ............................................................. 4,965 4,965 4,965 4,965705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................................... 545,775 545,775 545,775 545,775 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 4,876,228 4,876,228 4,876,228 4,876,228 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

710 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –278,200 –30,000 –30,000 

Average civilian end strength above projection ..................................................... [–38,500 ] [–30,000 ] Unobligated balances .............................................................................................. [–239,700 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –278,200 –30,000 –30,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY ........................................................ 39,945,237 39,918,243 40,380,005 457,368 40,402,605 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES ...................................................................................................... 837,012 926,012 837,012 75,000 912,012 

Crisis Response Force ............................................................................................. [40,600 ] [40,000 ] Marine Security Guard ............................................................................................. [48,400 ] [35,000 ] 

020 FIELD LOGISTICS ............................................................................................................... 894,555 898,555 894,555 894,555 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ........................................................ [4,000 ] 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 223,337 221,337 279,337 56,000 279,337 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [56,000 ] [56,000 ] Unjustified Growth HUMVEE Modifications ............................................................. [–2,000 ] 

040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING .............................................................................................. 97,878 97,878 97,878 97,878 

050 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................................ 774,619 781,719 774,619 774,619 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
11 

Sustainment to 90% ............................................................................................... [7,100 ] 

060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 2,166,661 2,166,661 2,166,661 2,166,661 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 4,994,062 5,092,162 5,050,062 131,000 5,125,062 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

070 RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................................................... 17,693 17,693 17,693 17,693 

080 OFFICER ACQUISITION ....................................................................................................... 896 896 896 896 090 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................................................................... 100,806 100,806 100,806 100,806 100 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ...................................................................... 46,928 46,928 46,928 46,928 110 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................................................................... 356,426 356,426 356,426 356,426 120 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 179,747 179,747 179,747 179,747 130 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................................................... 52,255 52,255 52,255 52,255 140 JUNIOR ROTC .................................................................................................................... 23,138 23,138 23,138 23,138 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .................................................................. 777,889 777,889 777,889 777,889 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 43,816 43,816 43,816 43,816 

160 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 305,107 305,107 305,107 305,107 180 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 87,500 87,500 87,500 87,500 185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................................... 46,276 46,276 46,276 46,276 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 482,699 482,699 482,699 482,699 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

190 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –50,000 0 

Unobligated balances .............................................................................................. [–50,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –50,000 0 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS ....................................... 6,254,650 6,302,750 6,310,650 131,000 6,385,650 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ....................................................................... 586,620 586,620 588,520 1,900 588,520 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
12 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [1,900 ] [1,900 ]

020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................... 7,008 7,008 7,008 7,008 040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................... 100,657 100,657 109,557 8,900 109,557 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [8,900 ] [8,900 ]

050 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......................................................................... 305 305 305 305 060 AVIATION LOGISTICS ......................................................................................................... 3,927 3,927 3,927 3,927 070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .......................................................................... 75,933 75,933 75,933 75,933 080 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ......................................................................... 601 601 601 601 090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 44,364 44,364 44,364 44,364 100 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .............................................................................................. 15,477 15,477 15,477 15,477 110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES .............................................................................................. 115,608 115,608 115,608 115,608 120 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................. 1,967 1,967 1,967 1,967 130 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 43,726 43,726 43,726 43,726 140 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ........................................................ 69,011 74,011 69,011 5,000 74,011 

Sustainment to 90% ............................................................................................... [5,000 ] [5,000 ] 

150 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 109,604 109,604 109,604 109,604 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 1,174,808 1,179,808 1,185,608 15,800 1,190,608 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

160 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 2,905 2,905 2,905 2,905 

170 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................... 14,425 14,425 14,425 14,425 180 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 2,485 2,485 2,485 2,485 190 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 3,129 3,129 3,129 3,129 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 22,944 22,944 22,944 22,944 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES ................................................ 1,197,752 1,202,752 1,208,552 15,800 1,213,552 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
13 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES .......................................................................................................... 96,244 96,244 96,244 96,244 

020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 17,581 19,081 17,581 17,581 

Restore Critical Depot Maintenance ....................................................................... [1,500 ] 

030 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ........................................................ 32,438 32,738 32,438 300 32,738 

Sustainment to 90% ............................................................................................... [300 ] [300 ] 

040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 95,259 95,259 95,259 95,259 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 241,522 243,322 241,522 300 241,822 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

050 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 894 894 894 894 

060 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 11,743 11,743 11,743 11,743 070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 9,158 9,158 9,158 9,158 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 21,795 21,795 21,795 21,795 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE ........................................... 263,317 265,117 263,317 300 263,617 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES .............................................................................................. 3,295,814 3,295,814 3,515,814 146,800 3,442,614 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [220,000 ] [146,800 ] 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ..................................................................................... 1,875,095 1,875,095 1,875,095 1,875,095 030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) ........................................................ 1,559,109 1,559,109 1,589,109 20,000 1,579,109 

Increase for ranges ................................................................................................. [30,000 ] [20,000 ] 

040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 5,956,304 5,961,304 6,146,304 190,000 6,146,304 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ........................................................ [5,000 ] Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [190,000 ] [190,000 ] 

050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 1,834,424 2,224,454 1,909,424 100,314 1,934,738 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [219,500 ] [75,000 ] [100,314 ] Restoration, Modernization, and Demolition project shortfalls .............................. [170,530 ] 

060 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 2,779,811 2,779,811 2,779,811 2,779,811 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
14 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ................................................................................... 913,841 913,841 913,841 –2,512 911,329 

Remove program growth for foreign currency fluctuation ..................................... [–2,512 ] 

080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS .............................................................................. 916,837 916,837 916,837 916,837 

100 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ............................................................ 720,349 720,349 720,349 720,349 110 LAUNCH FACILITIES ........................................................................................................... 305,275 305,275 305,275 305,275 120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................................................................... 433,658 433,658 433,658 433,658 130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT .................................................. 1,146,016 1,147,116 1,123,616 1,146,016 

Classified program decrease .................................................................................. [–22,400 ] NORTHCOM VOICE program ..................................................................................... [1,100 ] 

140 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .............................................................. 231,830 231,830 231,830 231,830 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 21,968,363 22,364,493 22,460,963 454,602 22,422,965 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ......................................................................................................... 2,015,902 2,015,902 2,015,902 2,015,902 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ......................................................................................... 147,216 147,216 147,216 147,216 170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 1,556,232 1,556,232 1,556,232 1,556,232 180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 167,402 167,402 167,402 167,402 

190 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 707,040 707,040 707,040 707,040 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ........................................................................................ 4,593,792 4,593,792 4,593,792 4,593,792 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION ....................................................................................................... 102,334 102,334 102,334 102,334 

210 RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................................................... 17,733 17,733 17,733 17,733 220 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) ................................................................. 94,600 94,600 94,600 94,600 230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 217,011 217,011 217,011 217,011 

240 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 800,327 800,327 800,327 800,327 250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................................................................... 399,364 399,364 399,364 399,364 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
15 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING .............................................................................................................. 792,275 792,275 792,275 792,275 270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ...................................................................... 248,958 248,958 248,958 248,958 280 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................................................................... 106,741 106,741 106,741 106,741 290 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 319,331 319,331 339,331 20,000 339,331 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [20,000 ] [20,000 ] 

300 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 122,736 122,736 122,736 122,736 310 EXAMINING ........................................................................................................................ 3,679 3,679 3,679 3,679 320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................................................... 137,255 137,255 137,255 137,255 330 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING ................................................................................ 176,153 176,153 176,153 176,153 340 JUNIOR ROTC .................................................................................................................... 67,018 67,018 67,018 67,018 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .................................................................. 3,605,515 3,605,515 3,625,515 20,000 3,625,515 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS .................................................................................................... 1,103,684 1,103,684 1,103,684 1,103,684 

360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................... 919,923 919,923 919,923 919,923 370 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 56,601 52,601 56,601 56,601 

Heavy bomber eliminations related to New START treaty implementation ............ [–400 ] ICBM reductions related to New START implementation ....................................... [–3,600 ] 

380 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 281,061 281,061 281,061 281,061 

390 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 1,203,305 1,203,305 1,203,305 –5,177 1,198,128 

Unjustified increase for public-private competitions ............................................. [–5,177 ] 

400 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 593,865 593,865 593,865 593,865 

410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 574,609 574,609 574,609 574,609 420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................... 1,028,600 1,013,200 1,028,600 1,028,600 

De-MIRVing ICBMs related to New START treaty implementation ......................... [–700 ] ICBM eliminations and Environmental Impact Study related to New START treaty implementation ............................................................................................... [–14,700 ] 

430 CIVIL AIR PATROL ............................................................................................................. 24,720 24,720 24,720 24,720 

460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 89,008 89,008 89,008 89,008 465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................................... 1,227,796 1,222,996 1,227,796 1,227,796 

Classified Adjustment ............................................................................................. [–4,800 ] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 7,103,172 7,078,972 7,103,172 –5,177 7,097,995 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
16 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

470 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –205,100 –200,000 –200,000 

Average civilian end strength above projection ..................................................... [–18,700 ] [–200,000 ] Unobligated balances .............................................................................................. [–186,400 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –205,100 –200,000 –200,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE .............................................. 37,270,842 37,437,672 37,783,442 269,425 37,540,267 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES .............................................................................................. 1,857,951 1,857,951 1,857,951 1,857,951 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ....................................................................................... 224,462 224,462 224,462 –4,400 220,062 

Unjustified growth in civilian personnel compensation ......................................... [–4,400 ] 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 521,182 521,182 521,182 521,182 

040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 89,704 98,804 98,404 8,970 98,674 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [9,100 ] [8,700 ] [8,970 ] 

050 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 360,836 360,836 360,836 360,836 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 3,054,135 3,063,235 3,062,835 4,570 3,058,705 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 64,362 64,362 64,362 64,362 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 15,056 15,056 15,056 15,056 080 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) .............................................................. 23,617 23,617 23,617 23,617 090 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) ..................................................................... 6,618 6,618 6,618 6,618 100 AUDIOVISUAL ..................................................................................................................... 819 819 819 819 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ................................. 110,472 110,472 110,472 110,472 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
17 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE ............................................ 3,164,607 3,173,707 3,173,307 4,570 3,169,177 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 

010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 3,371,871 3,371,871 3,371,871 3,371,871 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ....................................................................................... 720,305 720,305 720,305 720,305 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 1,514,870 1,514,870 1,514,870 1,514,870 040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 296,953 323,853 325,153 28,200 325,153 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [26,900 ] [28,200 ] [28,200 ] 

050 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 597,303 597,303 597,303 597,303 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 6,501,302 6,528,202 6,529,502 28,200 6,529,502 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 32,117 32,117 32,117 32,117 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 32,585 32,585 32,585 32,585 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES ............................... 64,702 64,702 64,702 64,702 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG ......................................................... 6,566,004 6,592,904 6,594,204 28,200 6,594,204 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 

010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF .................................................................................................... 472,239 472,239 472,239 472,239 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ..................................................................................... 5,261,463 5,230,711 5,239,663 –27,852 5,233,611 

AFSOC Flying Hour Program .................................................................................... [70,100 ] [70,100 ] International SOF Information Sharing System ...................................................... [–7,017 ] [–7,017 ] Ongoing baseline contingency operations .............................................................. [–35,519 ] [–35,519 ] Other Operations—military construction collateral equipment non-recurring 

costs .................................................................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

Pilot program for SOF family members .................................................................. [5,000 ] [5,000 ] Preserve the force and families—human performance program .......................... [–16,605 ] [–11,605 ] Preserve the force and families—resiliency .......................................................... [–8,786 ] [–8,786 ] 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
18 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters to O&M, Army ................ [–31,200 ] [–31,200 ] Regional SOF Coordination Centers ........................................................................ [–14,725 ] [–14,725 ] USASOC Flying Hour Program ................................................................................. [18,000 ] [18,000 ] USSOCOM NCR Contractor Support ......................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–7,100 ] [–7,100 ] USSOCOM RSCC ...................................................................................................... [–14,700 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 5,733,702 5,702,950 5,711,902 –27,852 5,705,850 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

040 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY .................................................................................. 157,397 157,397 157,397 157,397 

050 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY ...................................................................................... 84,899 84,899 84,899 84,899 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .................................................................. 242,296 242,296 242,296 242,296 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS .............................................................................................. 144,443 165,443 166,142 21,699 166,142 

STARBASE ................................................................................................................ [21,000 ] [21,699 ] [21,699 ] 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ................................................................................ 612,207 612,207 612,207 –29,000 583,207 

Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent Targets ....................................... [–29,000 ] 

090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ................................................................... 1,378,606 1,378,606 1,378,606 –59,000 1,319,606 

Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent Targets ....................................... [–59,000 ] 

110 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY .......................................................................... 763,091 763,091 763,091 763,091 

120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ...................................................................... 1,326,243 1,326,243 1,326,243 1,326,243 140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY ................................................................................. 29,933 29,933 29,933 29,933 150 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ........................................................................................... 462,545 462,545 462,545 –11,028 451,517 

Cost of DISA computing service rates .................................................................... [–11,028 ] 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ................................................................................................ 222,979 222,979 222,979 222,979 

170 DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE ............................................................................................... 21,594 21,594 21,594 21,594 180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY .................................................................... 788,389 788,389 769,389 –26,800 761,589 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
19 

Combating terrorism fellowship program ............................................................... [–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] Global Train and Equip ........................................................................................... [–7,800 ] Regional centers for security centers—undistributed decrease ............................ [–12,000 ] [–12,000 ] 

190 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE ........................................................................................... 546,603 546,603 546,603 546,603 

210 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 35,151 35,151 35,151 35,151 220 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ............................................................................ 438,033 438,033 438,033 438,033 240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY ............................................................ 2,713,756 2,713,756 2,743,756 2,713,756 

Disability Impact Aid ............................................................................................... [5,000 ] Supplemental Impact Aid ........................................................................................ [25,000 ] 

250 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY ............................................................................................... 256,201 256,201 256,201 –1,400 254,801 

THAAD excess to requirement ................................................................................. [–1,400 ] 

270 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT ................................................................................. 371,615 217,715 98,315 –153,900 217,715 

Program decrease .................................................................................................... [–273,300 ] [–273,300 ] Program reduction ................................................................................................... [–153,900 ]Rephasing of Guam civilian water and waste water infrastructure projects ....... [119,400 ] 

280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ........................................................................ 2,010,176 1,922,676 2,003,176 –15,000 1,995,176 

BRAC 2015 Initiative ............................................................................................... [–8,000 ] [–8,000 ] Combatant Commanders Exercise Engagement Training Transformation ............. [90,500 ] OUSD(P) program decrease ..................................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] Procurement Technical Assistance Program—Enhanced Business Support ......... [10,000 ] Program decrease .................................................................................................... [–60,000 ] Realignment to Building Partnership Capacity authorities .................................... [–35,000 ] Reduction to Building Partnership Capacity authorities ........................................ [–75,000 ] 

290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES ......................................................................... 616,572 616,572 616,572 –5,000 611,572 

Price Growth Requested as Program Growth ......................................................... [–5,000 ] 

295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................................... 14,283,558 14,287,648 14,308,558 40,000 14,323,558 

Classified adjustment ............................................................................................. [4,090 ] [10,000 ] Increase to Operation Observant Compass ............................................................ [40,000 ] [30,000 ] Reduction to Operation Observant Compass .......................................................... [–15,000 ] SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ................................. 27,021,695 26,805,385 26,799,094 –239,429 26,782,266 

UNDISTRIBUTED 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
20 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

305 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –320,000 30,000 30,000 

Impact Aid ............................................................................................................... [25,000 ] [25,000 ] Impact Aid for Children with Severe Disabilities ................................................... [5,000 ] [5,000 ] Section 514. Study of Reserve Component General and Flag Officers ................. [3,000 ] Section 621. Expand the victims transitional compensation benefit .................... [10,000 ] Unobligated balances .............................................................................................. [–363,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –320,000 30,000 30,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE ....................................... 32,997,693 32,430,631 32,753,292 –237,281 32,760,412 

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 

040 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE 13,606 12,626 13,606 13,606 

Unjustified Growth ................................................................................................... [–980 ] 

050 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID ..................................................... 109,500 109,500 109,500 109,500 

060 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION .................................................................................. 528,455 528,455 528,455 528,455 080 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD ................................................................................................ 256,031 256,031 256,031 –124,700 131,331 

Program decrease .................................................................................................... [–124,700 ]

090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY ............................................................................ 298,815 298,815 298,815 298,815 100 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY ............................................................................. 316,103 316,103 316,103 316,103 110 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE .................................................................... 439,820 439,820 439,820 439,820 120 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE ....................................................................... 10,757 10,757 10,757 10,757 130 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES ................................................. 237,443 237,443 237,443 237,443 160 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND ................................................ 5,000 5,000 –5,000 0 

Program reduction ................................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ......................................................... 2,215,530 2,209,550 2,215,530 –129,700 2,085,830 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
21 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE .................................................................. 175,097,941 174,602,459 176,631,808 1,322,485 176,420,426 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4301.LOC

December 6, 2013 (8:19 p.m.)

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ..................................................................................................................... 217,571 247,571 217,571 217,571 

Missile Defense Deployment—Other .............................................................................. [15,000 ] Missile Defense Deployment to Turkey ........................................................................... [15,000 ] 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ................................................................................................ 8,266 8,266 8,266 8,266 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ..................................................................................................... 56,626 56,626 56,626 56,626 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ........................................................................................................... 4,209,942 4,209,942 4,209,942 4,209,942 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................................................................... 950,567 950,567 943,567 950,567 

NSHQ—Transfer at DoD Request ................................................................................... [–7,000 ] 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ...................................................................................................................... 474,288 474,288 474,288 474,288 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 1,349,152 1,349,152 1,485,452 1,349,152 

BuckEye terrain data increase ........................................................................................ [56,300 ] Transfer from JIEDDO—Train the Force ......................................................................... [80,000 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ........................................................................................ 655,000 655,000 655,000 655,000 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................... 301,563 796,563 301,563 301,563 

Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance ....................................................................... [495,000 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................................................................................... 706,214 706,214 706,214 706,214 

140 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................ 11,519,498 11,519,498 11,519,498 11,519,498 150 COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM .................................................................. 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 160 RESET ....................................................................................................................................... 2,240,358 3,740,358 2,240,358 1,100,000 3,340,358 

Restore Critical Army Reset ............................................................................................ [1,500,000 ] [1,100,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 22,749,045 24,774,045 22,878,345 1,100,000 23,849,045 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................................. 4,601,356 4,601,356 4,601,356 4,601,356 380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................................... 17,418 17,418 17,418 17,418 400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................. 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .................................................................................................. 94,820 94,820 94,820 94,820 430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ........................................................................................................ 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................................... 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 1,402,994 1,402,994 1,402,994 1,402,994 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ..................................................................... 6,530,588 6,530,588 6,530,588 6,530,588 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

530 UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................................................ 91,100 

Increase to support higher fuel rates ............................................................................ [91,100 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................. 91,100 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY ............................................................... 29,279,633 31,395,733 29,408,933 1,100,000 30,379,633 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ..................................................................................................... 6,995 6,995 6,995 6,995 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................................................................... 2,332 2,332 2,332 2,332 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 608 608 608 608 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................... 75,800 

Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance ....................................................................... [75,800 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................................................................................... 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 42,935 118,735 42,935 42,935 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES ....................................................... 42,935 118,735 42,935 42,935 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ..................................................................................................................... 29,314 29,314 29,314 29,314 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ................................................................................................ 1,494 1,494 1,494 1,494 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
4 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ..................................................................................................... 15,343 15,343 15,343 15,343 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ........................................................................................................... 1,549 1,549 1,549 1,549 060 AVIATION ASSETS ...................................................................................................................... 64,504 64,504 64,504 64,504 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 31,512 31,512 31,512 31,512 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................................................................................... 42,179 42,179 42,179 42,179 120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ................................................................................... 11,996 11,996 11,996 11,996 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 197,891 197,891 197,891 197,891 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................. 1,480 1,480 1,480 1,480 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 1,480 1,480 1,480 1,480 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG ............................................................... 199,371 199,371 199,371 199,371 

AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND MINISTRY OF DEFENSE 

010 SUSTAINMENT ........................................................................................................................... 2,735,603 2,735,603 2,735,603 2,735,603 020 INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................................................................................... 278,650 278,650 278,650 278,650 030 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION .......................................................................................... 2,180,382 2,180,382 2,180,382 2,180,382 040 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 626,550 626,550 626,550 626,550 

SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE ................................................................................. 5,821,185 5,821,185 5,821,185 5,821,185 

MINISTRY OF INTERIOR 

060 SUSTAINMENT ........................................................................................................................... 1,214,995 1,214,995 1,214,995 1,214,995 080 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION .......................................................................................... 54,696 54,696 54,696 54,696 090 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 626,119 626,119 626,119 626,119 

SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR ................................................................................. 1,895,810 1,895,810 1,895,810 1,895,810 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
5 

DETAINEE OPS 

110 SUSTAINMENT ........................................................................................................................... 7,225 7,225 7,225 7,225 140 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 

SUBTOTAL DETAINEE OPS ............................................................................................... 9,725 9,725 9,725 9,725 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

160 UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................................................ –1,500,000 –1,500,000 

Program decrease ........................................................................................................... [–1,500,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................. –1,500,000 –1,500,000 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND ......................................................... 7,726,720 7,726,720 7,726,720 –1,500,000 6,226,720 

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 

010 POWER ...................................................................................................................................... 279,000 279,000 250,000 –29,000 250,000 

Unjustified expenditure ................................................................................................... [–29,000 ] [–29,000 ] SUBTOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND ........................................................ 279,000 279,000 250,000 –29,000 250,000 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND .......................................................... 279,000 279,000 250,000 –29,000 250,000 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .............................................................................. 845,169 845,169 845,169 845,169 030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES .......................................................... 600 600 600 600 040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT .................................................................................. 17,489 17,489 17,489 17,489 050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT ............................................................................................................ 78,491 78,491 78,491 78,491 060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 162,420 202,420 162,420 162,420 

Restore critical depot maintenance ................................................................................ [40,000 ] 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................. 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 

080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ................................................................................................................. 50,130 50,130 50,130 50,130 090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .................................................................................. 949,539 960,939 949,539 949,539 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
6 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Spares ............................................................................................................................. [11,400 ] 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ................................................................................ 20,226 20,226 20,226 20,226 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................... 1,679,660 1,843,660 1,679,660 1,679,660 

Program increase ............................................................................................................ [164,000 ] 

120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......................................................................................... 126,000 

Program increase ............................................................................................................ [126,000 ] 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................................... 37,760 37,760 37,760 37,760 160 WARFARE TACTICS .................................................................................................................... 25,351 25,351 25,351 25,351 170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ............................................................... 20,045 20,045 20,045 20,045 180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...................................................................................................... 1,212,296 1,665,296 1,212,296 1,212,296 

Combat forces equipment ............................................................................................... [148,000 ] Combat forces shortfall .................................................................................................. [305,000 ] 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 10,203 10,203 10,203 10,203 250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 127,972 127,972 127,972 127,972 260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................................... 221,427 221,427 221,427 221,427 290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ............................................................... 13,386 13,386 13,386 13,386 300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ...................................................................................................... 110,940 110,940 110,940 110,940 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 5,585,804 6,380,204 5,585,804 5,585,804 

MOBILIZATION 

340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS .......................................................................... 18,460 18,460 18,460 18,460 360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT .......................................................................................................... 227,033 227,033 227,033 227,033 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ................................................................................................ 245,493 245,493 245,493 245,493 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ................................................................................................... 50,269 50,269 50,269 50,269 430 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................................................................................. 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
7 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .......................................................................... 55,669 55,669 55,669 55,669 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................................... 2,418 2,418 2,418 2,418 490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS .............................................................................................................. 516 516 516 516 510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ........................................................... 5,107 5,107 5,107 5,107 520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .................................................................................................. 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................. 2,545 2,545 2,545 2,545 550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................................. 153,427 153,427 153,427 153,427 580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ............................................................................ 8,570 8,570 8,570 8,570 620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ................................................................................................ 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 5,608 5,608 5,608 5,608 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 181,027 181,027 181,027 181,027 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

710 UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................................................ 155,400 

Increase to support higher fuel rates ............................................................................ [155,400 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................. 155,400 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY ............................................................... 6,067,993 7,017,793 6,067,993 6,067,993 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES .............................................................................................................. 992,190 992,190 992,190 992,190 020 FIELD LOGISTICS ....................................................................................................................... 559,574 559,574 559,574 559,574 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................... 570,000 626,000 570,000 570,000 

Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance ....................................................................... [56,000 ] 

060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ...................................................................................................... 69,726 69,726 69,726 69,726 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 2,191,490 2,247,490 2,191,490 2,191,490 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

110 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................................................................................. 108,270 108,270 134,270 108,270 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
8 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Transfer from JIEDDO—Train the Force ......................................................................... [26,000 ] SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .......................................................................... 108,270 108,270 134,270 108,270 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................................. 365,555 365,555 365,555 365,555 160 ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................................... 3,675 3,675 3,675 3,675 185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 825 825 825 825 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 370,055 370,055 370,055 370,055 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

190 UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................................................ 5,400 

Increase to support higher fuel rates ............................................................................ [5,400 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................. 5,400 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS ............................................... 2,669,815 2,731,215 2,695,815 2,669,815 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .............................................................................. 17,196 17,196 17,196 17,196 020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................. 200 200 200 200 040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .................................................................................. 12,304 12,304 12,304 12,304 090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................... 6,790 6,790 6,790 6,790 110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...................................................................................................... 13,210 13,210 13,210 13,210 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 55,700 55,700 55,700 55,700 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES ........................................................ 55,700 55,700 55,700 55,700 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
9 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES ................................................................................................................. 11,124 11,124 11,124 11,124 040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ...................................................................................................... 1,410 1,410 1,410 1,410 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 12,534 12,534 12,534 12,534 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE ................................................... 12,534 12,534 12,534 12,534 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...................................................................................................... 1,712,393 1,782,393 1,712,393 1,712,393 

Restore Critical Depot Maintenance ............................................................................... [70,000 ] 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ............................................................................................. 836,104 836,104 836,104 836,104 

030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) ................................................................ 14,118 14,118 14,118 14,118 040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................... 1,373,480 1,473,480 1,373,480 1,373,480 

Program increase ............................................................................................................ [100,000 ] 

050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ................................................. 122,712 122,712 122,712 122,712 060 BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 1,520,333 1,520,333 1,520,333 1,520,333 070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING .......................................................................................... 31,582 31,582 31,582 31,582 080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 147,524 147,524 147,524 147,524 110 LAUNCH FACILITIES .................................................................................................................. 857 857 857 857 120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ....................................................................................................... 8,353 8,353 8,353 8,353 130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT .......................................................... 50,495 50,495 50,495 50,495 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 5,817,951 5,987,951 5,817,951 5,817,951 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................ 3,091,133 3,141,133 3,091,133 3,091,133 

Restore Critical Depot Maintenance ............................................................................... [50,000 ] 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ................................................................................................ 47,897 47,897 47,897 47,897 

170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................... 387,179 887,179 387,179 130,000 517,179 

Program increase ............................................................................................................ [500,000 ] [130,000 ] 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
10 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ................................................. 7,043 7,043 7,043 7,043190 BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 68,382 68,382 68,382 68,382 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ................................................................................................ 3,601,634 4,151,634 3,601,634 130,000 3,731,634 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................................................................................. 100 100 100 100 210 RECRUIT TRAINING ................................................................................................................... 478 478 478 478 240 BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 19,256 19,256 19,256 19,256 250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ................................................................................................... 12,845 12,845 12,845 12,845 260 FLIGHT TRAINING ...................................................................................................................... 731 731 731 731 270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION .............................................................................. 607 607 607 607 280 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................................................................................. 720 720 720 720 320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .................................................................................. 152 152 152 152 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .......................................................................... 34,889 34,889 34,889 34,889 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................ 86,273 86,273 86,273 86,273 360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................. 2,511 2,511 2,511 2,511 390 BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 19,887 19,887 19,887 19,887 400 ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................................... 3,493 3,493 3,493 3,493 410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................. 152,086 152,086 152,086 152,086 420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................. 269,825 269,825 269,825 269,825 460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ......................................................................................................... 117 117 117 117 465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 16,558 16,558 16,558 16,558 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 550,750 550,750 550,750 550,750 

UNDISTRIBUTED 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
11 

470 UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................................................ 284,000 

Increase to support higher fuel rates ............................................................................ [284,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................. 284,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE ...................................................... 10,005,224 11,009,224 10,005,224 130,000 10,135,224 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................... 26,599 26,599 26,599 26,599 050 BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 6,250 6,250 6,250 6,250 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 32,849 32,849 32,849 32,849 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE .................................................... 32,849 32,849 32,849 32,849 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................... 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG ................................................................. 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ............................................................................................. 2,222,868 2,222,868 2,229,868 2,222,868 

NSHQ—Transfer at DoD Request ................................................................................... [7,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 2,222,868 2,222,868 2,229,868 2,222,868 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ........................................................................................ 27,781 27,781 27,781 27,781 090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ........................................................................... 45,746 45,746 45,746 45,746 120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY .............................................................................. 76,348 76,348 76,348 76,348 140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY ........................................................................................ 99,538 99,538 99,538 99,538 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
12 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ........................................................................................................ 9,620 9,620 9,620 9,620 180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY ............................................................................ 1,950,000 1,950,000 1,950,000 1,950,000 240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY .................................................................... 100,100 100,100 100,100 100,100 280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ................................................................................ 38,227 73,227 38,227 38,227 

Realignment to Building Partnership Capacity authories .............................................. [35,000 ] 

290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES ................................................................................. 2,784 2,784 2,784 2,784 295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 1,862,066 1,862,066 1,862,066 1,862,066 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ......................................... 4,212,210 4,247,210 4,212,210 4,212,210 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE ............................................... 6,435,078 6,470,078 6,442,078 6,435,078 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE .......................................................................... 62,829,052 67,071,152 62,962,352 –299,000 62,530,052 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4302.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Military Personnel Appropriations ................................................................................................. 130,399,881 130,219,281 130,129,881 –682,900 129,716,981 

Enlistment bonuses excess to requirement ....................................................................... [–38,000 ] Excess to requirement ........................................................................................................ [–64,300 ] 

Flight Paramedic Training Pay and Allowances—Army Guard ......................................... [4,500 ] Flight Paramedic Training Pay and Allowances—Army Reserve ...................................... [900 ] Full Time Pay and Allowances projected underexecution .................................................. [–10,000 ] Full Time Support projected underexecution ...................................................................... [–1,000 ] Military Personnel unobligated ........................................................................................... [–186,000 ] [–186,000 ] Permanent Change of Station Travel—Army ..................................................................... [–150,000 ] [–150,000 ] Recruiting and Retention programs excess to requirement .............................................. [–1,800 ] Reenlistment bonuses excess to requirement .................................................................... [–68,300 ] Reserve Incentive Programs excess to requirement .......................................................... [–7,750 ] Travel, Active Duty for Training, projected underexecution ............................................... [–18,000 ] Undistributed reduction consistent with pace of drawdown ............................................. [–120,000 ] [–137,750 ] 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions .................................................................. 6,676,750 6,676,750 6,676,750 6,676,750 Total, Military Personnel ............................................................................................................. 137,076,631 136,896,031 136,806,631 –682,900 136,393,731 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4401.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Military Personnel Appropriations ................................................................................................. 9,689,307 9,689,307 9,689,307 –40,500 9,648,807 

Projected underexecution .................................................................................................... [–40,500 ] 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions .................................................................. 164,033 164,033 164,033 164,033 Total, Military Personnel ............................................................................................................. 9,853,340 9,853,340 9,853,340 –40,500 9,812,840 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4402.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS. 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ....................................................................................... 25,158 25,158 25,158 25,158 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ........................................................... 25,158 25,158 25,158 25,158 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE FUEL COSTS SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL) ............................................................................. 61,731 61,731 61,731 61,731 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE .................................................. 61,731 61,731 61,731 61,731 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) .............................................................................................. 46,428 46,428 46,428 46,428 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE ........................................... 46,428 46,428 46,428 46,428 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA .................................................................................................... 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA ........................................................... 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510 

NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND LMSR MPF MLP ........................................................................................................................................ 134,917 134,917 22,717 –112,200 22,717 

Navy requested adjustment ....................................................................................... [–112,200 ] [–112,200 ] 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4501.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING .................................................................................................. 43,404 43,404 43,404 43,404 NATIONAL DEF SEALIFT VESSEL LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 116,784 116,784 116,784 116,784 DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS ................................................................................................. 60,703 60,703 60,703 60,703 TAH MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................................ 19,809 19,809 19,809 19,809 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................... 56,058 56,058 56,058 56,058 READY RESERVE FORCE ................................................................................................................ 299,025 299,025 299,025 299,025 

TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND ....................................................... 730,700 730,700 618,500 –112,200 618,500 

CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................ 451,572 451,572 451,572 451,572 RDT&E ........................................................................................................................................... 604,183 604,183 604,183 604,183 PROCUREMENT .............................................................................................................................. 1,368 1,368 1,368 1,368 

TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION ........................................ 1,057,123 1,057,123 1,057,123 1,057,123 

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................................................... 815,965 815,965 810,125 815,965 

Joint Interagency Task Force—West (PC3309) ......................................................... [–3,000 ] U.S. European Comman Counternarcotics Hedquaters Support (PC2346) ............... [–1,640 ] U.S. Special Operations Forces Support to U.S. European Command (PC6505) ..... [–1,200 ] 

DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM ......................................................................................... 122,580 122,580 122,580 122,580 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF ........................... 938,545 938,545 932,705 938,545 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................... 311,131 311,131 347,031 34,869 346,000 

Program increase ....................................................................................................... [35,900 ] [34,869 ] 

RDT&E PROCUREMENT .............................................................................................................................. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL .................................................. 312,131 312,131 348,031 34,869 347,000 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM IN-HOUSE CARE ............................................................................................................................. 8,880,738 8,880,738 8,880,738 8,880,738 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4501.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
4 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ................................................................................................................. 15,842,732 15,912,732 15,842,732 –67,000 15,775,732 

Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities ..................................... [60,000 ] Pharmaceutical drugs excess growth ....................................................................... [–67,000 ] Pilot program for investigational treatment of members of the Armed Forces for 

TBI and PTSD .......................................................................................................... [10,000 ]

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 2,505,640 2,505,640 2,505,640 2,505,640 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 1,450,619 1,450,619 1,450,619 1,450,619 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................................. 368,248 368,248 368,248 368,248 EDUCATION AND TRAINING ............................................................................................................ 733,097 733,097 733,097 733,097 BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS .......................................................................................... 1,872,660 1,872,660 1,872,660 1,872,660 R&D RESEARCH ............................................................................................................................. 9,162 9,162 9,162 9,162 R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................. 47,977 47,977 47,977 47,977 R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................... 291,156 291,156 291,156 291,156 R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION ............................................................................................... 132,430 132,430 132,430 132,430 R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................ 161,674 161,674 161,674 161,674 R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT ................................................................................................ 72,568 72,568 72,568 72,568 R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT ............................................................................................... 14,646 14,646 14,646 14,646 RDT&E UNDISTRIBUTED DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING .............................................................................................................. 89,404 89,404 89,404 89,404 PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION ..................................................................................... 377,577 377,577 377,577 377,577 PROC IEHR .................................................................................................................................... 204,200 204,200 204,200 204,200 UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................................................. –276,800 218,000 –57,000 –57,000 

DHP Unobligated ........................................................................................................ [–440,800 ] [–275,000 ] Restore Tricare savings ............................................................................................. [164,000 ] [218,000 ] [218,000 ] 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ................................................................. 33,054,528 32,847,728 33,272,528 –124,000 32,930,528 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4501.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
5 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ....................................................................... 37,638,854 37,432,054 37,774,714 –201,331 37,437,523 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4501.LOC

December 4, 2013 (6:39 p.m.)

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ....................................................................................... 44,732 44,732 44,732 44,732 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ........................................................... 44,732 44,732 44,732 44,732 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE C–17 CLS ENGINE REPAIR ............................................................................................................ 78,500 78,500 78,500 78,500 TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES ............................................................................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE .................................................. 88,500 88,500 88,500 88,500 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) .............................................................................................. 131,678 131,678 131,678 131,678 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE ........................................... 131,678 131,678 131,678 131,678 

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................................................... 376,305 376,305 376,305 376,305 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF ........................... 376,305 376,305 376,305 376,305 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................... 10,766 10,766 10,766 10,766 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL .................................................. 10,766 10,766 10,766 10,766 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM IN-HOUSE CARE ............................................................................................................................. 375,958 375,958 375,958 375,958 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ................................................................................................................. 382,560 382,560 382,560 382,560 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4502.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 132,749 132,749 132,749 132,749 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 2,238 2,238 2,238 2,238 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................................. 460 460 460 460 EDUCATION AND TRAINING ............................................................................................................ 10,236 10,236 10,236 10,236 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ................................................................. 904,201 904,201 904,201 904,201 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ....................................................................... 1,556,182 1,556,182 1,556,182 1,556,182 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4502.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:44 p.m.)

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION. 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Army ALASKA Fort Wainwright AVIATION BATTALION COMPLEX 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 Army ALASKA Fort Wainwright AVIATION STORAGE HANGAR 58,000 58,000 58,000 58,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 73,000 73,000 73,000 73,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson CENTRAL ENERGY PLANT 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson FIRE STATION 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson HEADQUARTERS BUILDING 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson RUNWAY 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson SIMULATOR BUILDING 12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200 Army FLORIDA Eglin AFB AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 Army GEORGIA Fort Gordon ADV INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS CPLX, PH2 61,000 61,000 61,000 61,000 Army HAWAII Fort Shafter COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY—ADMIN 75,000 65,000 75,000 –5,000 70,000 Army KANSAS Fort Leavenworth SIMULATIONS CENTER 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 Army KENTUCKY Fort Campbell BATTLEFIELD WEATHER SUPPORT FACILITY 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 Army MARYLAND Aberdeen Proving Ground OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 Army MARYLAND Fort Detrick ENTRY CONTROL POINT 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Army MARYLAND Fort Detrick HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE BUILDING 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600 Army MISSOURI Fort Leonard Wood ADV INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS CPLX, PH1 86,000 86,000 86,000 86,000 Army MISSOURI Fort Leonard Wood SIMULATOR BUILDING 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 Army NEW YORK U.S. Military Academy CADET BARRACKS, INCR 2 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 Army NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss CONTROL TOWER 10,800 10,800 10,800 10,800 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE COMPLEX 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 Army VIRGINIA Joint Base Langley-Eustis ADV INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS CPLX, PH3 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis-McChord AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 79,000 79,000 79,000 79,000 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis-McChord AIRFIELD OPERATIONS COMPLEX 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis-McChord AVIATION BATTALION COMPLEX 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 Army WASHINGTON Yakima AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 Army WORLDWIDE 

CLASSIFIED 

Classified Location COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX 33,000 33,000 33,000 –33,000 0 

Army JAPAN Kyoga Misaki COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX 0 0 0 33,000 33,000 Army KWAJALEIN Kwajalein Atoll PIER 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations HOST NATION SUPPORT FY14 33,000 23,000 33,000 –5,000 28,000 Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MINOR CONSTRUCTION FY14 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN FY14 41,575 41,575 41,575 41,575 

Total Military Construction, Army ................................................................................................................................. 1,119,875 1,099,875 1,119,875 –10,000 1,109,875 

Navy CALIFORNIA Barstow ENGINE DYNAMOMETER FACILITY 14,998 14,998 14,998 14,998 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT UPGRADE 13,124 13,124 13,124 13,124 Navy CALIFORNIA Coronado H–60 TRAINER FACILITY 8,910 8,910 8,910 8,910 Navy CALIFORNIA Point Mugu AIRCRAFT ENGINE TEST PADS 7,198 7,198 7,198 7,198 Navy CALIFORNIA Point Mugu BAMS CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE HANGAR 17,469 17,469 17,469 17,469 Navy CALIFORNIA Port Hueneme UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING CONVERSION 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 Navy CALIFORNIA San Diego STEAM PLANT DECENTRALIZATION 34,331 34,331 34,331 34,331 Navy CALIFORNIA Twentynine Palms CAMP WILSON INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES 33,437 33,437 33,437 33,437 Navy FLORIDA Jacksonville P–8A TRAINING & PARKING APRON EXPANSION 20,752 20,752 20,752 20,752 Navy FLORIDA Key West AIRCRAFT CRASH/RESCUE & FIRE HEADQUARTERS 14,001 14,001 14,001 14,001 Navy FLORIDA Mayport LCS LOGISTICS SUPPORT FACILITY 16,093 16,093 16,093 16,093 Navy GEORGIA Albany CERS DISPATCH FACILITY 1,010 1,010 1,010 1,010 Navy GEORGIA Albany WEAPONS STORAGE AND INSPECTION FACILITY 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 Navy GEORGIA Savannah TOWNSEND BOMBING RANGE LAND ACQ—PHASE 1 61,717 61,717 61,717 61,717 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR—NORTH RAMP 85,673 85,673 0 85,673 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas BAMS FORWARD OPERATIONAL & MAINTENANCE 

HANGAR 

61,702 61,702 61,702 61,702 

Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas DEHUMIDIFIED SUPPLY STORAGE FACILITY 17,170 17,170 17,170 17,170 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas EMERGENT REPAIR FACILITY EXPANSION 35,860 35,860 35,860 35,860 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas MODULAR STORAGE MAGAZINES 63,382 63,382 63,382 63,382 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
4 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas SIERRA WHARF IMPROVEMENTS 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas X-RAY WHARF IMPROVEMENTS 53,420 53,420 53,420 53,420 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay 3RD RADIO BN MAINTENANCE/OPERATIONS COMPLEX 25,336 25,336 25,336 25,336 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE EXPANSION 16,968 16,968 16,968 16,968 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR UPGRADES 31,820 31,820 31,820 31,820 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay ARMORY ADDITION AND RENOVATION 12,952 12,952 12,952 12,952 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay AVIATION SIMULATOR MODERNIZATION/ADDITION 17,724 17,724 17,724 17,724 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay MV–22 HANGAR 57,517 57,517 57,517 57,517 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay MV–22 PARKING APRON AND INFRASTRUCTURE 74,665 74,665 74,665 74,665 Navy HAWAII Pearl City WATER TRANSMISSION LINE 30,100 30,100 30,100 30,100 Navy HAWAII Pearl Harbor DRYDOCK WATERFRONT FACILITY 22,721 22,721 22,721 22,721 Navy HAWAII Pearl Harbor SUBMARINE PRODUCTION SUPPORT FACILITY 35,277 35,277 35,277 35,277 Navy ILLINOIS Great Lakes UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING 35,851 35,851 35,851 35,851 Navy MAINE Bangor NCTAMS VLF COMMERCIAL POWER CONNECTION 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 Navy MAINE Kittery STRUCTURAL SHOPS CONSOLIDATION 11,522 11,522 11,522 11,522 Navy MARYLAND Fort Meade MARFORCYBERCOM HQ-OPS BUILDING 83,988 83,988 83,988 83,988 Navy NEVADA Fallon WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 11,334 11,334 11,334 11,334 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune LANDFILL—PHASE 4 20,795 20,795 20,795 20,795 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune OPERATIONS TRAINING COMPLEX 22,515 22,515 22,515 22,515 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune STEAM DECENTRALIZATION—BEQ NODES 18,679 18,679 18,679 18,679 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune STEAM DECENTRALIZATION—CAMP JOHNSON 2,620 2,620 2,620 2,620 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune STEAM DECENTRALIZATION—HADNOT POINT 13,390 13,390 13,390 13,390 Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River CH–53K MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY 13,218 13,218 13,218 13,218 Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR 12,547 12,547 12,547 12,547 Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River REGIONAL COMMUNICATION STATION 20,098 20,098 20,098 20,098 Navy OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB TACAMO E–6B HANGAR 14,144 14,144 14,144 14,144 Navy RHODE ISLAND Newport HEWITT HALL RESEARCH CENTER 12,422 12,422 12,422 12,422 Navy SOUTH CAROLINA Charleston NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONAL TRAINING FACILITY 73,932 73,932 73,932 73,932 Navy VIRGINIA Dam Neck AERIAL TARGET OPERATION CONSOLIDATION 10,587 10,587 10,587 10,587 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
5 

Navy VIRGINIA Norfolk PIER 11 POWER UPGRADES FOR CVN–78 3,380 3,380 3,380 3,380 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION FACILITY TECOM SCHOOLS 25,731 25,731 25,731 25,731 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico ATC TRANSMITTER/RECEIVER RELOCATION 3,630 3,630 3,630 3,630 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico FULLER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 9,013 9,013 9,013 9,013 Navy VIRGINIA Yorktown SMALL ARMS RANGES 18,700 18,700 18,700 18,700 Navy WASHINGTON Bremerton INTEGRATED WATER TREATMENT SYS DRY DOCKS 

3&4 

18,189 18,189 18,189 18,189 

Navy WASHINGTON Kitsap EXPLOSIVES HANDLING WHARF #2 (INC) 24,880 24,880 24,880 24,880 Navy WASHINGTON Whidbey Island EA–18G FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 32,482 32,482 32,482 32,482 Navy WASHINGTON Whidbey Island P–8A HANGAR AND TRAINING FACILITIES 85,167 85,167 85,167 85,167 Navy DJIBOUTI Camp Lemonier ARMORY 6,420 6,420 6,420 6,420 Navy DJIBOUTI Camp Lemonier UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING 22,580 22,580 22,580 22,580 Navy JAPAN Camp Butler AIRFIELD SECURITY UPGRADES 5,820 5,820 5,820 5,820 Navy JAPAN Yokosuka COMMUNICATION SYSTEM UPGRADE 7,568 7,568 7,568 7,568 Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MCON DESIGN FUNDS 89,830 89,830 89,830 89,830 Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 19,740 19,740 19,740 19,740 Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 

Total Military Construction, Navy ................................................................................................................................. 1,700,269 1,700,269 1,614,596 0 1,700,269 

AF ARIZONA Luke AFB F–35 FIELD TRAINING DETACHMENT 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 AF ARIZONA Luke AFB F–35 SQ OPS/AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE UNIT #3 21,400 21,400 21,400 21,400 AF CALIFORNIA Beale AFB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND STATION OPS BLDG 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 AF FLORIDA Tyndall AFB F–22 MUNITIONS STORAGE COMPLEX 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PAR—FUEL SYS HARDENED BLDGS 20,000 20,000 0 20,000 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PAR—STRIKE TACTICAL MISSILE MXS FACILITY 10,530 10,530 10,530 10,530 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PAR—TANKER GP MX HANGAR/AMU/SQD OPS 132,600 132,600 0 132,600 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PRTC RED HORSE AIRFIELD OPERATIONS FACILITY 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PRTC SF FIRE RESCUE & EMERGENCY MGT 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600 AF HAWAII Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam C–17 MODERNIZE HGR 35, DOCKS 1&2 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A 2–Bay Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Hangar 0 82,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A 3–Bay General Purpose Maintenance Hangar 0 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
6 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A Aircraft Parking Apron Alteration 0 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A Aprons Fuels Distribution System 0 12,800 12,800 12,800 12,800 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A Flight Simulator Facility Phase 1 0 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A General Maintenance Hangar 0 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A Miscellaneous Facilities Alteration 0 970 970 970 970 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A Pipeline Student Dormatory 0 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 AF KENTUCKY Fort Campbell 19TH AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQDRN EXPANSION 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 AF MARYLAND Fort Meade CYBERCOM JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER, INCREMENT 

1 

85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 

AF MARYLAND Joint Base Andrews HELICOPTER OPERATIONS FACILITY 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 AF MISSOURI Whiteman AFB WSA MOP IGLOOS AND ASSEMBLY FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 AF NEBRASKA Offutt AFB USSTRATCOM REPLACEMENT FACILITY, INCR 3 136,000 136,000 136,000 136,000 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB ADD RPA WEAPONS SCHOOL FACILITY 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB DORMITORY (240 RM) 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F–35 ALT MISSION EQUIP (AME) STORAGE 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F–35 FUEL CELL HANGAR 9,400 9,400 9,400 9,400 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F–35 PARTS STORE 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB AIRMEN AND FAMILY READINESS CENTER 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB DORMITORY (144 RM) 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB SATELLITE DINING FACILITY 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 AF NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB F–16 AIRCRAFT COVERED WASHRACK AND PAD 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 AF NEW MEXICO Kirtland AFB NUCLEAR SYSTEMS WING & SUSTAINMENT CENTER 

(PH 

30,500 30,500 30,500 30,500 

AF NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB B–52 ADAL AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE UNIT 15,530 15,530 15,530 15,530 AF NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB B–52 MUNITIONS STORAGE IGLOOS 8,300 8,300 8,300 8,300 AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC–46A FTU ADAL Fuel Systems Maintenance Dock 0 3,350 3,350 3,350 3,350 AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC–46A FTU ADAL Squad Ops/AMU 0 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC–46A FTU Flight Training Center Simulators Facility Phase 1 0 12,600 12,600 12,600 12,600 AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC–46A FTU Fuselage Trainer Phase 1 0 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
7 

AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC–46A FTU Renovate Facility 0 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 AF OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB KC–46A LAND ACQUISITION 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 AF TEXAS Fort Bliss F–16 BAK 12/14 AIRCRAFT ARRESTING SYSTEM 3,350 3,350 3,350 3,350 AF UTAH Hill AFB F–35 AIRCRAFT MX UNIT HANGAR 45E OPS #1 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 AF UTAH Hill AFB FIRE CRASH RESCUE STATION 18,500 18,500 18,500 18,500 AF VIRGINIA Joint Base Langley-Eustis 4–BAY CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS INSPECTION 

BLDG 

4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 

AF GREENLAND Thule AB THULE CONSOLIDATION, PHASE 2 43,904 43,904 43,904 43,904 AF MARIANA ISLANDS Saipan PAR—AIRPORT POL/BULK STORAGE AST 18,500 18,500 18,500 18,500 AF MARIANA ISLANDS Saipan PAR—HAZARDOUS CARGO PAD 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 AF MARIANA ISLANDS Saipan PAR—MAINTENANCE FACILITY 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 AF UNITED KINGDOM Croughton RAF MAIN GATE COMPLEX 12,000 0 0 –12,000 0 AF UNITED KINGDOM VARLOCS GUARDIAN ANGEL OPERATIONS FACILITY 22,047 22,047 0 22,047 AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations KC–46A FTU FACILITY PROJECTS 63,000 0 0 –63,000 0 AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations KC–46A MOB #1 FACILITY PROJECTS 192,700 0 0 –192,700 0 AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING & DESIGN 11,314 11,314 11,314 11,314 AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 20,448 20,448 20,448 20,448 

Total Military Construction, Air Force .......................................................................................................................... 1,156,573 1,138,843 964,196 –17,730 1,138,843 

Def-Wide ALASKA Clear AFS BMDS UPGRADE EARLY WARNING RADAR 17,204 17,204 17,204 17,204 Def-Wide ALASKA Fort Greely MECHANICAL-ELECTRICAL BLDG MISSILE FIELD #1 82,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Brawley SOF DESERT WARFARE TRAINING CENTER 23,095 23,095 23,095 23,095 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Defense Distribution 

Depot-Tracy 

GENERAL PURPOSE WAREHOUSE 37,554 37,554 37,554 37,554 

Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Miramar REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Def-Wide COLORADO Fort Carson SOF GROUP SUPPORT BATTALION 22,282 22,282 22,282 22,282 Def-Wide FLORIDA Hurlburt Field SOF ADD/ALTER OPERATIONS FACILITY 7,900 7,900 7,900 7,900 Def-Wide FLORIDA Jacksonville REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Def-Wide FLORIDA Key West SOF BOAT DOCKS 3,600 0 3,600 3,600 Def-Wide FLORIDA Panama City REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING FACILITY 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Def-Wide FLORIDA Tyndall AFB REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Benning FAITH MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITION 6,031 6,031 6,031 6,031 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
8 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Benning WHITE ELEMTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 37,304 37,304 37,304 37,304 Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Stewart DIAMOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 44,504 44,504 44,504 44,504 Def-Wide GEORGIA Hunter Army Airfield REPLACE FUEL ISLAND 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 Def-Wide GEORGIA Moody AFB REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING FACILITY 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 Def-Wide HAWAII Ford Island DISA PACIFIC FACILITY UPGRADES 2,615 2,615 2,615 2,615 Def-Wide HAWAII Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam ALTER WAREHOUSE SPACE 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell FORT CAMPBELL HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 59,278 59,278 59,278 59,278 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell MARSHALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 38,591 38,591 38,591 38,591 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell SOF GROUP SPECIAL TROOPS BATTALION 26,342 26,342 26,342 26,342 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Knox AMBULATORY HEALTH CENTER 265,000 265,000 75,000 –120,000 145,000 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Knox CONSOLIDATE/REPLACE VAN VOORHIS-MUDGE ES 38,023 38,023 38,023 38,023 Def-Wide MARYLAND Aberdeen Proving Ground PUBLIC HEALTH COMMAND LAB REPLACEMENT 210,000 110,000 75,000 –135,000 75,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Bethesda Naval Hospital MECH & ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS 46,800 46,800 46,800 46,800 Def-Wide MARYLAND Bethesda Naval Hospital PARKING GARAGE 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Detrick USAMRIID REPLACEMENT STAGE 1, INCR 8 13,000 0 13,000 13,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Meade HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING CAPACITY INC 3 431,000 431,000 381,000 –35,000 396,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Meade NSAW RECAPITALIZE BUILDING #1/SITE M INC 2 58,000 58,000 58,000 58,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Joint Base Andrews AMBULATORY CARE CENTER INC 2 76,200 63,800 38,100 –38,100 38,100 Def-Wide MASSACHUSETTS Hanscom AFB HANSCOM PRIMARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 36,213 36,213 36,213 36,213 Def-Wide NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-DixLakehurst REPLACE FUEL DISTRIBUTION COMPONENTS 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB MEDICAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM 21,400 21,400 21,400 21,400 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune SOF PERFORMANCE RESILIENCY CENTER 14,400 0 14,400 14,400 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune SOF SUSTAINMENT TRAINING COMPLEX 28,977 28,977 28,977 28,977 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg CONSOLIDATE/REPLACE POPE HOLBROOK ELEMENTARY 37,032 37,032 37,032 37,032 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF CIVIL AFFAIRS BATTALION ANNEX 37,689 37,689 37,689 37,689 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF COMBAT MEDIC SKILLS SUSTAIN. COURSE BLDG 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
9 

Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF ENGINEER TRAINING FACILITY 10,419 10,419 10,419 10,419 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF LANGUAGE AND CULTURAL CENTER 64,606 64,606 64,606 64,606 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF UPGRADE TRAINING FACILITY 14,719 14,719 14,719 14,719 Def-Wide NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 6,400 6,400 6,400 6,400 Def-Wide OKLAHOMA Altus AFB REPLACE REFUELER PARKING 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 Def-Wide OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB REPLACE FUEL DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 Def-Wide PENNSYLVANIA Def Distribution Depot 

New Cumberland 

UPGRADE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL WAREHOUSE 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 

Def-Wide PENNSYLVANIA Def Distribution Depot 

New Cumberland 

UPGRADE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 

Def-Wide SOUTH CAROLINA Beaufort BOLDEN ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 41,324 41,324 41,324 41,324 Def-Wide TENNESSEE Arnold Air Force Base REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING FACILITY 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 Def-Wide TEXAS Fort Bliss HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT INCR 5 252,100 152,100 100,000 –152,100 100,000 Def-Wide TEXAS Joint Base San Antonio SAMMC HYPERBARIC FACILITY ADDITION 12,600 12,600 12,600 12,600 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Dam Neck SOF HUMAN PERFORMANCE CENTER 11,147 0 11,147 11,147 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Def Distribution Depot 

Richmond 

OPERATIONS CENTER PHASE 1 87,000 87,000 87,000 87,000 

Def-Wide VIRGINIA Joint Expeditionary Base 

Little Creek—Story 

SOF LOGSU TWO OPERATIONS FACILITY 30,404 30,404 30,404 30,404 

Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon BOUNDARY CHANNEL ACCESS CONTROL POINT 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon ARMY NAVY DRIVE TOUR BUS DROP OFF 1,850 1,850 0 –1,850 0 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon PFPA SUPPORT OPERATIONS CENTER 14,800 14,800 14,800 14,800 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon RAVEN ROCK ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITY UPGRADE 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon RAVEN ROCK EXTERIOR COOLING TOWER 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Quantico QUANTICO MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 40,586 40,586 40,586 40,586 Def-Wide WASHINGTON Whidbey Island REPLACE FUEL PIER BREAKWATER 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE 

CLASSIFIED 

Classified Location AN/TPY–2 RADAR SITE 15,000 15,000 15,000 –15,000 0 

Def-Wide BAHRAIN ISLAND SW Asia MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT 45,400 45,400 45,400 45,400 Def-Wide BELGIUM Brussels NATO HEADQUARTERS FACILITY 38,513 38,513 38,513 38,513 Def-Wide BELGIUM Brussels NATO HEADQUARTERS FIT-OUT 29,100 29,100 29,100 29,100 Def-Wide GERMANY Kaiserlautern AB KAISERSLAUTERN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 49,907 49,907 0 49,907 Def-Wide GERMANY Ramstein AB RAMSTEIN HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 98,762 98,762 0 98,762 Def-Wide GERMANY Rhine Ordnance Barracks MEDICAL CENTER REPLACEMENT, INCR 3 151,545 151,545 76,545 –75,000 76,545 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
10 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Def-Wide GERMANY Weisbaden HAINERBERG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 58,899 58,899 0 58,899 Def-Wide GERMANY Weisbaden WIESBADEN MIDDLE SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 50,756 50,756 0 50,756 Def-Wide JAPAN Atsugi REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING FACILITY 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 Def-Wide JAPAN Iwakuni CONSTRUCT HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 Def-Wide JAPAN Kadena AB KADENA MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITION/RENOVATION 38,792 38,792 38,792 38,792 Def-Wide JAPAN Kyoga Misaki AN/TPY–2 RADAR SITE 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 Def-Wide JAPAN Torri Commo Station SOF FACILITY AUGMENTATION 71,451 64,071 71,451 71,451 Def-Wide JAPAN Yokosuka UPGRADE FUEL PUMPS 10,600 10,600 10,600 10,600 Def-Wide KOREA Camp Walker DAEGU MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 52,164 52,164 52,164 52,164 Def-Wide ROMANIA Deveselu AEGIS ASHORE MISSILE DEF SYS CMPLX, INCREM. 2 85,000 80,000 85,000 –5,000 80,000 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall REPLACE FUEL STORAGE 17,732 17,732 0 17,732 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS AND HANGAR/AMU 0 48,448 0 48,448 48,448 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF AIRFILED PAVEMENTS 24,077 0 0 –24,077 0 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF HANGAR/AMU 24,371 0 0 –24,371 0 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF MRSP AND PARTS STORAGE 6,797 6,797 0 6,797 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY 11,652 11,652 0 11,652 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Royal Air Force 

Lakenheath 

LAKENHEATH HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 69,638 69,638 0 69,638 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION 10,000 0 10,000 –10,000 0 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations EXERCISE RELATED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 9,730 9,730 9,730 9,730 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING & DESIGN 10,891 10,891 10,891 10,891 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 50,192 50,192 50,192 50,192 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 75,905 75,905 75,905 75,905 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
11 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 57,053 57,053 57,053 57,053 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 36,866 36,866 36,866 36,866 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 6,931 6,931 6,931 6,931 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 7,430 7,430 7,430 7,430 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 5,409 5,409 5,409 5,409 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 5,170 5,170 5,170 5,170 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 9,578 9,578 9,578 9,578 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 

Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide .................................................................................................................. 3,985,300 3,708,373 2,930,659 –572,050 3,413,250 

Chem Demil KENTUCKY Blue Grass Army Depot AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY, PH XIV 122,536 122,536 122,536 122,536 

Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense ............................................................................................. 122,536 122,536 122,536 0 122,536 

NATO WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Nato Security Investment Program NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 239,700 199,700 239,700 –40,000 199,700 

Total NATO Security Investment Program .................................................................................................................... 239,700 199,700 239,700 –40,000 199,700 

Army NG ALABAMA Decatur NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Army NG ARKANSAS Fort Chaffee SCOUT/RECCE GUNNERY COMPLEX 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 Army NG FLORIDA Pinellas Park READY BUILDING 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 Army NG ILLINOIS Kankakee AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 Army NG ILLINOIS Kankakee READINESS CENTER 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Army NG MASSACHUSETTS Camp Edwards ENLISTED BARRACKS, TRANSIENT TRAINING ADD 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Army NG MICHIGAN Camp Grayling ENLISTED BARRACKS, TRANSIENT TRAINING 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
12 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Army NG MINNESOTA Stillwater READINESS CENTER 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 Army NG MISSISSIPPI Camp Shelby WATER SUPPLY/TREATMENT BUILDING, POTABLE 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Army NG MISSISSIPPI Pascagoula READINESS CENTER 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 Army NG MISSOURI Macon VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 Army NG MISSOURI Whiteman AFB AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Army NG NEW YORK New York READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 Army NG OHIO Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant SANITARY SEWER 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 Army NG PENNSYLVANIA Fort Indiantown Gap AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONAL BUILDING 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Army NG PUERTO RICO Camp Santiago MANEUVER AREA TRAINING & EQUIPMENT SITE 

ADDIT 

5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 

Army NG SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville READINESS CENTER 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Army NG SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Army NG TEXAS Fort Worth ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER ADD 14,270 14,270 14,270 14,270 Army NG WYOMING Afton NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 29,005 24,005 29,005 –5,000 24,005 Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 12,240 12,240 12,240 12,240 

Total Military Construction, Army National Guard ....................................................................................................... 320,815 315,815 320,815 –5,000 315,815 

Army Res CALIFORNIA Camp Parks ARMY RESERVE CENTER 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 Army Res CALIFORNIA Fort Hunter Liggett TASS TRAINING CENTER (TTC) 16,500 16,500 16,500 16,500 Army Res MARYLAND Bowie ARMY RESERVE CENTER 25,500 25,500 25,500 25,500 Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-DixLakehurst AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN (MPMG) 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-DixLakehurst CENTRAL ISSUE FACILITY 7,900 7,900 7,900 7,900 Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-DixLakehurst CONSOLIDATED DINING FACILITY 13,400 13,400 13,400 13,400 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
13 

Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-DixLakehurst MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 Army Res NEW YORK Bullville ARMY RESERVE CENTER 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 Army Res NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg ARMY RESERVE CENTER 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 Army Res WISCONSIN Fort McCoy ACCESS CONTROL POINT/MAIL/FREIGHT CENTER 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 Army Res WISCONSIN Fort McCoy NCO ACADEMY DINING FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 Army Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 14,212 14,212 14,212 14,212 Army Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 1,748 1,748 1,748 1,748 

Total Military Construction, Army Reserve .................................................................................................................. 174,060 174,060 174,060 0 174,060 

N/MC Res CALIFORNIA March AFB NOSC MORENO VALLEY RESERVE TRAINING CENTER 11,086 11,086 11,086 11,086 N/MC Res MISSOURI Kansas City RESERVE TRAINING CENTER—BELTON, MISSOURI 15,020 15,020 15,020 15,020 N/MC Res TENNESSEE Memphis RESERVE BOAT MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY 4,330 4,330 4,330 4,330 N/MC Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MCNR PLANNING & DESIGN 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 N/MC Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USMCR PLANNING AND DESIGN 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 

Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve ................................................................................... 32,976 32,976 32,976 0 32,976 

Air NG ALABAMA Birmingham IAP ADD TO AND ALTER DISTRIBUTED GROUND STATION 

F 

8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 

Air NG INDIANA Hulman Regional Airport ADD/ALTER BLDG 37 FOR DIST COMMON GROUND 

STA 

7,300 7,300 7,300 7,300 

Air NG MARYLAND Fort Meade 175TH NETWORK WARFARE SQUADRON FACILITY 4,000 0 4,000 4,000 Air NG MARYLAND Martin State Airport CYBER/ISR FACILITY 8,000 0 8,000 8,000 Air NG MONTANA Great Falls IAP INTRA-THEATER AIRLIFT CONVERSION 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Air NG NEW YORK Fort Drum MQ–9 FLIGHT TRAINING UNIT HANGAR 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 Air NG OHIO Springfield Beckley-Map ALTER INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS FACILITY 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 Air NG PENNSYLVANIA Fort Indiantown Gap COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS AND TRAINING 

FACILI 

7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 

Air NG RHODE ISLAND Quonset State Airport C–130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING FACILITY 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Air NG TENNESSEE McGhee-Tyson Airport TEC EXPANSION- DORMITORY & CLASSROOM FACILITY 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
14 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Air NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions PLANNING AND DESIGN 13,400 13,400 13,400 13,400 Air NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 

Total Military Construction, Air National Guard .......................................................................................................... 119,800 107,800 119,800 0 119,800 

AF Res CALIFORNIA March AFB JOINT REGIONAL DEPLOYMENT PROCESSING CENTER, 19,900 19,900 19,900 19,900 AF Res FLORIDA Homestead AFS ENTRY CONTROL COMPLEX 9,800 9,800 9,800 9,800 AF Res OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB AIR CONTROL GROUP SQUADRON OPERATIONS 12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200 AF Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions PLANNING AND DESIGN 2,229 2,229 2,229 2,229 AF Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 1,530 1,530 1,530 1,530 

Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve ........................................................................................................... 45,659 45,659 45,659 0 45,659 

FH Con Army WISCONSIN Fort McCoy FAMILY HOUSING NEW CONSTRUCTION (56 UNITS) 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 FH Con Army GERMANY South Camp Vilseck FAMILY HOUSING NEW CONSTRUCTION (29 UNITS) 16,600 16,600 0 16,600 FH Con Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FAMILY HOUSING P & D 4,408 4,408 4,408 4,408 

Total Family Housing Construction, Army .................................................................................................................... 44,008 44,008 27,408 0 44,008 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS 33,125 33,125 33,125 33,125 FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations LEASED HOUSING 180,924 180,924 180,924 180,924 FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY FACILITIES 107,639 107,639 107,639 107,639 FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 54,433 54,433 54,433 54,433 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
15 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MILITARY HOUSING PRIVITIZATION INITIATIVE 25,661 25,661 25,661 25,661 FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MISCELLANEOUS 646 646 646 646 FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations SERVICES 13,536 13,536 13,536 13,536 FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UTILITIES 96,907 96,907 96,907 96,907 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army .............................................................................................. 512,871 512,871 512,871 0 512,871 

FH Con AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IMPROVEMENTS 72,093 72,093 72,093 72,093 FH Con AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 4,267 4,267 4,267 4,267 

Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force ............................................................................................................. 76,360 76,360 76,360 0 76,360 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 39,470 39,470 39,470 39,470 FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations HOUSING PRIVATIZATION 41,436 41,436 41,436 41,436 FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations LEASING 54,514 54,514 54,514 54,514 FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MAINTENANCE (RPMA RPMC) 110,786 110,786 110,786 110,786 FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 53,044 53,044 53,044 53,044 FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT 1,954 1,954 1,954 1,954 FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations SERVICES ACCOUNT 16,862 16,862 16,862 16,862 FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UTILITIES ACCOUNT 70,532 70,532 70,532 70,532 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Air Force ....................................................................................... 388,598 388,598 388,598 0 388,598 

FH Con Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DESIGN 4,438 4,438 4,438 4,438 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
16 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

FH Con Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IMPROVEMENTS 68,969 68,969 68,969 68,969 

Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps ..................................................................................... 73,407 73,407 73,407 0 73,407 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 21,073 21,073 21,073 21,073 FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations LEASING 74,962 74,962 74,962 74,962 FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 90,122 90,122 90,122 90,122 FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 60,782 60,782 60,782 60,782 FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT 362 362 362 362 FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS 27,634 27,634 27,634 27,634 FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations SERVICES ACCOUNT 20,596 20,596 20,596 20,596 FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UTILITIES ACCOUNT 94,313 94,313 94,313 94,313 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps ................................................................ 389,844 389,844 389,844 0 389,844 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 67 67 67 67 FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 3,196 3,196 3,196 3,196 FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 20 20 20 20 FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations LEASING 10,994 10,994 10,994 10,994 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
17 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations LEASING 40,433 40,433 40,433 40,433 FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 311 311 311 311 FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 74 74 74 74 FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 418 418 418 418 FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations SERVICES ACCOUNT 32 32 32 32 FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UTILITIES ACCOUNT 12 12 12 12 FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UTILITIES ACCOUNT 288 288 288 288 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide ................................................................................ 55,845 55,845 55,845 0 55,845 

FHIF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND 1,780 1,780 1,780 1,780 

Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund ............................................................................................................ 1,780 1,780 1,780 0 1,780 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Base Realignment & Clo- sure, Army BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 180,401 180,401 180,401 180,401 BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Base Realignment & Clo- sure, Navy BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE 108,300 108,300 108,300 108,300 BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DOD BRAC ACTIVITIES—AIR FORCE 126,376 126,376 126,376 126,376 BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–100: PLANING, DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT 7,277 7,277 7,277 7,277 BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–101: VARIOUS LOCATIONS 20,988 20,988 20,988 20,988 BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–138: NAS BRUNSWICK, ME 993 993 993 993 BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–157: MCSA KANSAS CITY, MO 40 40 40 40 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
18 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–172: NWS SEAL BEACH, CONCORD, CA 5,766 5,766 5,766 5,766 BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–84: JRB WILLOW GROVE & CAMBRIA REG AP 1,216 1,216 1,216 1,216 

Total Base Realignment and Closure Account ............................................................................................................ 451,357 451,357 451,357 0 451,357 

PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—ANG UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 0 –45,623 0 0 PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—ARMY BID SAVINGS 0 –14,000 0 0 PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—ARMY PLANNING AND DE- SIGN FY12 0 –50,000 0 0 PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—DEFENSE WIDE BID SAVINGS 0 –358,400 0 0 PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—DEFENSE WIDE UNSPEC- IFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 0 –16,470 0 0 PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—NAVY BID SAVINGS 0 –49,920 0 0 PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—SECTION 1013 OF THE DEMONSTRATION CITIES AND METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1966, AS AMENDED 0 –50,000 0 0 

Total Prior Year Savings ............................................................................................................................................... 0 –584,413 0 0 0 Total Military Construction ............................................................................................................................................ 11,011,633 10,055,563 9,662,342 –644,780 10,366,853 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4601.LOC

December 5, 2013 (10:39 p.m.)

sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
2 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL 

SECURITY PROGRAMS 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS. 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Discretionary Summary By Appropriation 

Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: 

Energy Programs 

Electricity delivery and energy reliability ................................................................................... 16,000 –16,000 –16,000 –16,000 0 Nuclear Energy ........................................................................................................................... 94,000 0 0 0 94,000 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities 

National nuclear security administration: 

Weapons activities ............................................................................................................ 7,868,409 220,000 0 40,843 7,909,252 Defense nuclear nonproliferation ...................................................................................... 2,140,142 0 80,000 40,000 2,180,142 Naval reactors ................................................................................................................... 1,246,134 0 0 0 1,246,134 

Office of the administrator ............................................................................................... 397,784 –8,000 0 –8,000 389,784 

Total, National nuclear security administration ..................................................................... 11,652,469 212,000 80,000 72,843 11,725,312 Environmental and other defense activities: 

Defense environmental cleanup ........................................................................................ 5,316,909 –358,000 –80,000 –301,500 5,015,409 Other defense activities .................................................................................................... 749,080 0 0 9,578 758,658 

Total, Environmental & other defense activities .................................................................... 6,065,989 –358,000 –80,000 –291,922 5,774,067 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
3 

Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities .......................................................................................... 17,718,458 –146,000 0 –219,079 17,499,379 

Total, Discretionary Funding ............................................................................................................................... 17,828,458 –162,000 –16,000 –235,079 17,593,379 Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 

Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 

Infrastructure security & energy restoration (HS) .............................................................................. 16,000 –16,000 –16,000 –16,000 0 

Nuclear Energy 

Idaho sitewide safeguards and security ..................................................................................................... 94,000 94,000 

Weapons Activities 

Life extension programs and major alterations 

B61 Life extension program ....................................................................................................... 537,044 44,000 537,044 W76 Life extension program ...................................................................................................... 235,382 9,700 9,700 245,082 W78/88–1 Life extension program ............................................................................................. 72,691 5,600 72,691 W88 ALT 370 .............................................................................................................................. 169,487 169,487 

Total, Stockpile assessment and design .......................................................................................... 1,014,604 59,300 0 9,700 1,024,304 Stockpile systems 

B61 Stockpile systems ............................................................................................................... 83,536 83,536 W76 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 47,187 47,187 W78 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 54,381 54,381 W80 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 50,330 50,330 B83 Stockpile systems ............................................................................................................... 54,948 6,000 54,948 W87 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 101,506 101,506 W88 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 62,600 62,600 Stockpile systems 

Total, Stockpile systems .................................................................................................................... 454,488 6,000 0 0 454,488 Surveillance Weapons dismantlement and disposition 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
4 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Operations and maintenance ..................................................................................................... 49,264 6,000 55,264 

Stockpile services 

Production support ..................................................................................................................... 321,416 29,600 23,584 345,000 Research and development support .......................................................................................... 26,349 3,200 26,349 R&D certification and safety ..................................................................................................... 191,259 18,300 191,259 Management, technology, and production ................................................................................. 214,187 214,187 Plutonium sustainment .............................................................................................................. 156,949 9,500 156,949 

Total, Stockpile services ................................................................................................................... 910,160 60,600 0 23,584 933,744 

Total, Directed stockpile work ................................................................................................................... 2,428,516 125,900 0 39,284 2,467,800 Campaigns: 

Science campaign 

Advanced certification ............................................................................................................... 54,730 54,730 Primary assessment technologies .............................................................................................. 109,231 109,231 Dynamic materials properties .................................................................................................... 116,965 116,965 Advanced radiography ................................................................................................................ 30,509 30,509 Secondary assessment technologies .......................................................................................... 86,467 86,467 

Total, Science campaign ................................................................................................................... 397,902 0 0 0 397,902 Engineering campaign 

Enhanced surety ......................................................................................................................... 51,771 2,500 51,771 Weapon systems engineering assessment technology .............................................................. 23,727 23,727 Nuclear survivability .................................................................................................................. 19,504 19,504 Enhanced surveillance ............................................................................................................... 54,909 4,000 54,909 

Total, Engineering campaign ............................................................................................................. 149,911 6,500 0 0 149,911 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
5 

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign 

Ignition ....................................................................................................................................... 80,245 80,245 Support of other stockpile programs ......................................................................................... 15,001 15,001 Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support ................................................................... 59,897 59,897 Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion ................................................................................. 5,024 5,024 Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas ....................................................... 8,198 8,198 Facility operations and target production ................................................................................. 232,678 232,678 

Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield campaign ......................................................... 401,043 0 0 0 401,043 Advanced simulation and computing campaign ................................................................................ 564,329 564,329 Technology Maturation Campaign Readiness Campaign 

Component manufacturing development ................................................................................... 106,085 106,085 Tritium readiness ....................................................................................................................... 91,695 91,695 

Total, Readiness campaign ............................................................................................................... 197,780 0 0 0 197,780 

Total, Campaigns ......................................................................................................................................... 1,710,965 6,500 0 0 1,710,965 

Nuclear programs 

Nuclear operations capability ............................................................................................................. 265,937 265,937 Capabilities based investments ......................................................................................................... 39,558 39,558 Construction: 

12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL ...................................................................................... 26,722 26,722 11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project Phase 2, LANL ........................................................... 30,679 30,679 07–D–220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility upgrade project, LANL ....................... 55,719 55,719 06–D–141 PED/Construction, Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project Y–12 ..................... 325,835 325,835 

Total, Construction ............................................................................................................................. 438,955 0 0 0 438,955 

Total, Nuclear programs ............................................................................................................................. 744,450 0 0 0 744,450 Secure transportation asset 

Operations and equipment ................................................................................................................. 122,072 122,072 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
6 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Program direction ................................................................................................................................ 97,118 97,118 

Total, Secure transportation asset ............................................................................................................ 219,190 0 0 0 219,190 Site stewardship 

Nuclear materials integration ............................................................................................................. 17,679 17,679 Corporate project management .......................................................................................................... 13,017 13,017 Minority serving institution partnerships program ............................................................................. 14,531 14,531 Enterprise infrastructure 

Site Operations ........................................................................................................................... 1,112,455 1,112,455 Site Support ............................................................................................................................... 109,561 109,561 Sustainment ............................................................................................................................... 433,764 65,100 433,764 Facilities disposition .................................................................................................................. 5,000 5,000 

Subtotal, Enterprise infrastructure ................................................................................................... 1,660,780 65,100 0 0 1,660,780 

Total, Site stewardship ............................................................................................................................... 1,706,007 65,100 0 0 1,706,007 Defense nuclear security 

Operations and maintenance .............................................................................................................. 664,981 664,981 Construction: 

14–D–710 DAF Argus, NNSS ..................................................................................................... 14,000 

Total, Defense nuclear security ................................................................................................................. 678,981 0 0 0 678,981 NNSA CIO activities ...................................................................................................................................... 148,441 22,500 1,559 150,000 Legacy contractor pensions ......................................................................................................................... 279,597 279,597 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
7 

Subtotal, Weapons activities ............................................................................................................................... 7,916,147 220,000 0 40,843 7,956,990 

Adjustments 

Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................. –47,738 –47,738 

Total, Adjustments ....................................................................................................................................... –47,738 0 0 0 –47,738 

Total, Weapons Activities .................................................................................................................................... 7,868,409 220,000 0 40,843 7,909,252 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs 

Global threat reduction initiative ....................................................................................................... 424,487 23,000 424,487 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D 

Operations and maintenance ..................................................................................................... 388,838 388,838 

Nonproliferation and international security ........................................................................................ 141,675 141,675 International material protection and cooperation ............................................................................. 369,625 –23,000 369,625 Fissile materials disposition 

U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition 

Operations and maintenance 

U.S. plutonium disposition ....................................................................................... 157,557 157,557 U.S. uranium disposition ......................................................................................... 25,000 25,000 

Total, Operations and maintenance ................................................................................ 182,557 0 0 0 182,557 Construction: 

99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC ................... 320,000 80,000 40,000 360,000 

Total, Construction ........................................................................................................... 320,000 0 80,000 40,000 360,000 

Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition ..................................................................... 502,557 0 80,000 40,000 542,557 

Total, Fissile materials disposition ................................................................................................... 502,557 0 80,000 40,000 542,557 Legacy contractor pensions ................................................................................................................ 93,703 93,703 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
8 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs ................................................................................. 1,920,885 0 80,000 41,559 1,962,444 Nuclear counterterrorism incident response program ................................................................................. 181,293 181,293 Counterterrorism and counterproliferation programs .................................................................................. 74,666 74,666 Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ............................................................................................. 2,176,844 0 80,000 40,000 2,216,844 

Adjustments 

Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................. –36,702 –36,702 

Total, Adjustments ....................................................................................................................................... –36,702 0 0 0 –36,702 

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ............................................................................................................ 2,140,142 0 80,000 40,000 2,180,142 Naval Reactors 

Naval reactors operations and infrastructure ............................................................................................. 455,740 –2,000 –2,000 –2,000 453,740 Naval reactors development ........................................................................................................................ 419,400 419,400 Ohio replacement reactor systems development ......................................................................................... 126,400 126,400 S8G Prototype refueling ............................................................................................................................... 144,400 144,400 Program direction ......................................................................................................................................... 44,404 44,404 Construction: 

14–D–902 KL Materials characterization laboratory expansion, KAPL .............................................. 1,000 1,000 14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF ........................................................... 45,400 45,400 13–D–905 Remote-handled low-level waste facility, INL .................................................................. 21,073 21,073 13–D–904 KS Radiological work and storage building, KSO ............................................................ 600 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,600 Naval Reactor Facility, ID ................................................................................................................... 1,700 1,700 

Total, Construction ...................................................................................................................................... 69,773 2,000 2,000 2,000 71,773 

Subtotal, Naval Reactors ..................................................................................................................................... 1,260,117 0 0 0 1,260,117 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
9 

Adjustments: 

Use of prior year balances (Naval reactors) ...................................................................................... –13,983 –13,983 

Total, Naval Reactors .......................................................................................................................................... 1,246,134 0 0 0 1,246,134 

Office Of The Administrator 

Office of the administrator .......................................................................................................................... 397,784 –8,000 –8,000 389,784 

Total, Office Of The Administrator ...................................................................................................................... 397,784 –8,000 0 –8,000 389,784 

Defense Environmental Cleanup 

Closure sites: 

Closure sites administration ............................................................................................................... 4,702 4,702 

Hanford site: 

River corridor and other cleanup operations ...................................................................................... 393,634 20,000 15,000 408,634 Central plateau remediation ............................................................................................................... 513,450 513,450 Richland community and regulatory support ..................................................................................... 14,701 14,701 

Total, Hanford site ...................................................................................................................................... 921,785 0 20,000 15,000 936,785 Idaho National Laboratory: 

Idaho cleanup and waste disposition ................................................................................................ 362,100 30,000 10,500 372,600 Idaho community and regulatory support .......................................................................................... 2,910 2,910 

Total, Idaho National Laboratory ............................................................................................................... 365,010 0 30,000 10,500 375,510 NNSA sites 

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ............................................................................................ 1,476 1,476 Nuclear facility D & D Separations Process Research Unit .............................................................. 23,700 23,700 Nevada ................................................................................................................................................ 61,897 61,897 Sandia National Laboratories ............................................................................................................. 2,814 2,814 Los Alamos National Laboratory ......................................................................................................... 219,789 40,000 15,000 234,789 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
10 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites ..................................................................................................... 309,676 0 40,000 15,000 324,676 Oak Ridge Reservation: 

OR Nuclear facility D & D .................................................................................................................. 73,716 73,716 OR cleanup and disposition ............................................................................................................... 115,855 10,000 115,855 OR reservation community and regulatory support ............................................................................ 4,365 4,365 

Total, Oak Ridge Reservation ..................................................................................................................... 193,936 0 10,000 0 193,936 Office of River Protection: 

Waste treatment and immobilization plant 

01–D–416 A–E/ORP–0060 / Major construction ....................................................................... 690,000 690,000 

Tank farm activities 

Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ................................................................ 520,216 50,000 520,216 

Total, Office of River protection ................................................................................................................ 1,210,216 0 50,000 0 1,210,216 Savannah River sites: 

Savannah River risk management operations ................................................................................... 432,491 432,491 SR community and regulatory support ............................................................................................... 11,210 11,210 Radioactive liquid tank waste: 

Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition .................................................... 552,560 95,000 150,000 105,000 657,560 Construction: 

05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River ............................................ 92,000 92,000 

Total, Construction .................................................................................................................... 92,000 0 0 0 92,000 

Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste ................................................................................................ 644,560 95,000 150,000 105,000 749,560 

Total, Savannah River site ......................................................................................................................... 1,088,261 95,000 150,000 105,000 1,193,261 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
11 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 

Waste isolation pilot plant ................................................................................................................. 203,390 33,000 16,000 219,390 

Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant .............................................................................................................. 203,390 0 33,000 16,000 219,390 Program direction ......................................................................................................................................... 280,784 20,000 280,784 Program support .......................................................................................................................................... 17,979 17,979 Safeguards and Security: 

Oak Ridge Reservation ........................................................................................................................ 18,800 18,800 Paducah .............................................................................................................................................. 9,435 9,435 Portsmouth .......................................................................................................................................... 8,578 8,578 Richland/Hanford Site ......................................................................................................................... 69,078 10,000 69,078 Savannah River Site ........................................................................................................................... 121,196 10,000 121,196 Waste Isolation Pilot Project ............................................................................................................... 4,977 4,977 West Valley .......................................................................................................................................... 2,015 2,015 

Technology development .............................................................................................................................. 24,091 10,000 10,000 24,091 

Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup ......................................................................................................... 4,853,909 105,000 383,000 161,500 5,015,409 

Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution ............................................................................................... 463,000 –463,000 –463,000 –463,000 0 

Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup ............................................................................................................... 5,316,909 –358,000 –80,000 –301,500 5,015,409 Other Defense Activities 

Health, safety and security 

Health, safety and security ................................................................................................................. 143,616 143,616 Program direction ................................................................................................................................ 108,301 108,301 

Total, Health, safety and security ............................................................................................................. 251,917 0 0 0 251,917 Specialized security activities ...................................................................................................................... 196,322 9,578 205,900 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES
12 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Office of Legacy Management 

Legacy management ........................................................................................................................... 163,271 163,271 Program direction ................................................................................................................................ 13,712 13,712 

Total, Office of Legacy Management ......................................................................................................... 176,983 0 0 0 176,983 Defense-related activities Defense related administrative support 

Chief financial officer ......................................................................................................................... 38,979 38,979 Chief information officer ..................................................................................................................... 79,857 79,857 

Total, Defense related administrative support ......................................................................................... 118,836 0 0 0 118,836 

Office of hearings and appeals ................................................................................................................... 5,022 5,022 

Subtotal, Other defense activities ...................................................................................................................... 749,080 0 0 9,578 758,658 Total, Other Defense Activities ........................................................................................................................... 749,080 0 0 9,578 758,658 


E:\BILLS\DOD_TABLES\MOST_RECENT\LOCATOR\L_T4701.LOC

December 4, 2013 (11:57 p.m.)

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS-DOD-TABLES