alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. B. (Brad) Clarke, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ending September 30,
2005 on Form 10-QSB/A of Organetix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: December 28, 2005

/s/ L. B. (Brad) Clarke
------------------------------
Name: L. B. (Brad) Clarke
Title: Chief Executive Officer
11-i

CHAPTER 11. COMMERCIAL CONSUMER SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

11.1 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 11-1
11-1

CHAPTER 11. COMMERCIAL CONSUMER SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

11.1 METHODOLOGY

The commercial consumer subgroup analysis evaluates impacts on any identifiable 

groups or commercial consumers who may be disproportionately affected by a national energy 

conservation standard. DOE will conduct this analysis as one of the analyses for the notice of 

proposed rulemaking. DOE will accomplish this, in part, by analyzing the life-cycle costs 

(LCCs) and payback periods (PBPs) for those commercial consumers that fall into any 

identifiable groups. DOE plans to evaluate variations in regional energy prices, variations in 

energy use, and variations in installation costs that might affect the net present value of a 

standard to commercial consumer subpopulations. To the extent possible, DOE will obtain 

estimates of each input parameter’s variability and will consider this variability in its calculation 

of commercial consumer impacts.

DOE will determine the impact on commercial consumer subgroups using the LCC 

Spreadsheet Model, which allows for different data inputs. The standard LCC analysis (described 

in chapter 8) focuses on the commercial consumers that use commercial packaged boilers. DOE 

can use the LCC Spreadsheet Model to analyze the LCC for any subgroup by sampling only that 

subgroup. (Chapter 8 explains in detail the inputs to the model used in determining LCC and 

PBPs.)
|         (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         (2)    | The      information contained      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial      condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May      23, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Seth Shaw                                                  |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | Seth      Shaw                                                                |   |
|                               |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer (principal      executive officer) |   |
|                               |   |                                                                          |   |
EXHIBIT 23.3


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

     We  consent  to the use in the Pre  Effective  Amendment  No. 1 on Form S-4
Registration  Statement of Magnum Hunter Resources,  Inc. ("The Company") of our
reports dated April 23, 1997 and April 3, 1996,  respectively,  accompanying the
historical summaries of revenues and direct operating expenses of the Properties
to be Acquired April 30, 1997, and the consolidated  financial statements of The
Company contained in such Registration Statement; and our report dated August 2,
1996  accompanying  the  historical  summaries of revenues and direct  operating
expenses of the Properties Acquired June 28, 1996 incorporated by reference into
such Registration Statement,  and to the use of our name and the statements with
respect to us, as  appearing  under the heading  "Experts"  in the  Registration
Statement.


/s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
- ----------------------------
HEIN + ASSOICATES LLP
Certified Public Accountants



October 23, 1997
Dallas, Texas
Exhibit 12

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  (in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31,2009

2008

2007

2006

2005Earnings:Pre-tax income from continuing operations

$
382,042

$
603,141

$
663,283

$
741,097

$
486,532Add:Pre-tax (loss) income from 50% or greater than 50% owned unconsolidated entities


(22,914
)

(29,093
)

(9,061
)

45,313


49,939Distributed income from less than 50% owned unconsolidated entities


60,877


61,482


51,594


53,000


66,165Amortization of capitalized interest


4,367


4,927


2,462


5,027


2,772Fixed Charges


1,247,543


1,254,111


1,196,718


958,818


904,324Less:Income from unconsolidated entities


(40,220
)

(32,246
)

(38,120
)

(110,819
)

(81,807
)Interest capitalization


(14,749
)

(28,451
)

(37,270
)

(34,073
)

(15,502
)Earnings

$
1,616,946

$
1,833,871

$
1,829,606

$
1,658,363

$
1,412,423Fixed Charges:Portion of rents representative of the interest factor


9,082


8,996


9,032


9,052


8,869Interest on indebtedness (including amortization of debt expense)


1,223,712


1,196,334


1,150,416


915,693


879,953Interest capitalized


14,749


28,451


37,270


34,073


15,502Loss on extinguishment of debt





20,330








Fixed Charges

$
1,247,543

$
1,254,111

$
1,196,718

$
958,818

$
904,324Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


1.30x


1.46x


1.53x


1.73x


1.56x


For
purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, "earnings" have been computed by adding fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest, to income from continuing
operations including income from noncontrolling interests and our share of income from 50% owned unconsolidated affiliates which have fixed charges, and our share of distributed operating income from
less than 50% owned unconsolidated affiliates instead of our share of income from the less than 50% owned unconsolidated affiliates. There are generally no restrictions on our ability to receive
distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures where no preference in favor of the other owners of the joint venture exists. "Fixed charges" consist of interest costs, whether expensed or
capitalized, the interest component of rental expenses, preferred distributions, losses on extinguishment of debt, and amortization of debt issuance costs.

120

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       1255142
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1267142)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
g

p

Regards, 

-Harold 

My name is Harold Peterson, and I am an environmental scientist specializing in air pollution, particularly 

ozone, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter. I am writing to support this docket as written. 

Since all sites in the Knoxville area are measuring values below 0.075 ppm it is clear the metro area is in 

attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone standard. I am somewhat suspicious of the large projected decreases in 

NOx from road sources, given that vehicle traffic will almost certainly be increasing throughout the modeled 

time period. It seems likely that smaller (and in my mind more probable) reductions in NOx from road sources, 

and hence from all sources since the primary total reduction is from road sources, will still result in continued 

attainment ofthe ozone standard given that current NOx emissions are resulting in ozone attainment. 

I have no further comments regarding this docket. 

Sincerely, 

Harold Peterson 

---------- Forwarded message----------

From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@genkdca-smmi05.gseg.att.com> 

Date: Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:02PM 

Subject: Mail delivery failed 

To: harold.peterson2@gmail.com 

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. 

A message that you have sent could not be delivered to one or more 

recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address failed: 

<r4-arms@epa.gov>: 550 5.1.1 <R4-ARMS@epa.gov>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in relay 

recipient table 

Included is a copy of the message header: 

Received: from unknown [209.85.220.182] (EHLO mail-gk0-fl82.google.com) 

by genkdca-smmi OS. gseg.att.com(mxl_ mta-7.2 .1-0) over TLS secured channel 

with ESMTP id edd63755.0.1565816.00-442.2989863.genkdca-smmi05.gseg.att.com (envelope-from 

<harold. peterson2@gmai I. com>); 

1 
Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:02:06 +0000 (UTC) 

Received: by qkhq76 with SMTP id q76so58752083qkh.2 

for <R4-ARMS@epa.gov>; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 15:02:06 -0700 (PDT) 

DKIM-Signature: v=l; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; 

d=gmail.com; s=20120113; 

h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; 

bh=HD3wEJ8Rt6YQqgl SW9o VWcPygdohwnCoes4Qid5aLAw=; 

b=xYLG1bJhY5tFjzuYDi0UeyhDHJtKOIQfWKVRtes82HBJUhLYSPKhqprOZLb2qRVTcO 

nXtXdiEvQ8Q 1 zAKA 1 h9plp+ XDQRiXifrBStMZBQTz+UuSZpPxdP J7rw9ewg8p6TPqKOI 

QzzE9aBJsyYt8uiXtLMByEGgS7/J1dhntle615WOXLbWgf02u2f6jtSfXvAxHuGkDf+w 

ZHJ3bo9tOwvVwlV dVb78DjMO/bpBC03kcv Akk2LfUZc9Y sOw 51 nTHg9gOIKGnNY3 RVWC 

FmapiSCLqA 7HpC8yZ+QH6RELqw4PDcbevZ80ipbaRvfin6Ul wzPCxHIK8rEUmPn 1 rYQMy 

yeAg 

MIME-Version: 1.0 

X-Received: by 10.55.20.17 with SMTP id e17mr18758811qkh.I02.1433628126224; 

Sat, 06 Jun 2015 15:02:06-0700 (PDT) 

Received: by 10.96.156.134 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jun 2015 15:02:06 -0700 (PDT) 

Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 17:02:06 -0500 

Message-10: <CAM2jOQqNhGTfSBPyVpl ZOrQu2RHDrP08cs02yhKdyV8Vnn dLQ@mail.gmail.com> 

Subject Docket 10 No. EPA-R04-0AR-2014-0870 

From: Harold Peterson <harold.peterson2@grnail.com> 

To: R4-ARMS <R4-ARMS@cpa.gov> 

Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=OO 1 a 1144d2683425c00517e08f98
========================================================
Household Finance Corporation
Household Revolving Home Equity Loan 
Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates - Series
1995-2
P & S Agreement Date:              Nov 1, 1995
Original Settlement Date:           Nov 21, 1995
Series Number of Class A-1 Certificates:     441919AG2
Series Number of Class A-2 Certificates:     N/A
Original Sale Balance:             $637,660,000
========================================================

                                                                  
    
          Sum of 1/21/97 - 12/22/97
1997 AGGREGATE PAYMENTS                                           
         
     Distribution Dates

Distribution Date                                                 
           
                   Total 1997 (1)

Class A-1 Interest Distributed                                    
                  26,002,115.93
Class A-1 Interest Pymt Factor (per 1,000)                        
                  40.777398504

Investor Principal Distribution A-1                               
                  159,098,691.15
Class A-1 Principal Pymt Factor (per 1,000)                       
                  249.503953753

Ending Class A-1 Principal Outstanding
Class A-1 Pool Factor


(1) These amounts represent cash distributions paid by the trust
during the 1997 calendar year.
      As such, they do not represent the economic accrual of
interest for tax purposes.
#### In the case of the master’s report, Haig and others *vs.*the commissioners of confiscated estates,

case *ix.*

p

Attachment for non-com-terns of Talc!

It was ordered, (a rule having been before taken out,) that an attachment do peremptorily issue against James Neilson, unless the terms of sale are complied with in three weeks from this time»
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Southern Copper Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Eduardo Gonzalez Felix,Vice President of Finance of the Company and Chief Financial Officer certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                                 | /s/ Eduardo Gonzalez  Felix |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   |                                 | Eduardo Gonzalez  Felix     |
|   | Vice President of  Finance and Chief |
|   |                                 | Financial  Officer          |   |

 

 

Date: March 6,2006

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by section 906 has been provided to Southern CopperCorporation and will be retained by Southern Copper Corporation and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason
W. Rees, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: December 10, 2004

/s/ Jason W. Rees
________________________

Jason W. Rees
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 19

- 00876

- CV

VIP FLOORING, LLC and Philip Vipond, Appellants

v.

Curtis WALKER

, Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 19

- 159 Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 29, 2020

MOTIO N TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant s filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the

appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the

parties regarding the assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant s

. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant)

.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3605 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3605

  To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize States to issue 
  special permits to allow the operation of vehicles of up to 95,000 
   pounds on Interstate System highways for the hauling of livestock.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2009

Mr. Rooney (for himself and Mr. Putnam) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize States to issue 
  special permits to allow the operation of vehicles of up to 95,000 
   pounds on Interstate System highways for the hauling of livestock.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS FOR INTERSTATE SYSTEM HIGHWAYS.

    Section 127(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) Hauling of livestock.--A State may allow, by special 
        permit, the operation of vehicles with a gross vehicle weight 
        of up to 95,000 pounds for the hauling of livestock. The cost 
        of a special permit issued under this paragraph may not exceed 
        $200 per year for a livestock trailer.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6699

EDWARD HOWARD NORRIS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-616-AM) Submitted: September 6, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002 Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Howard Norris, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Kathleen Beatty Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Edward Howard Norris seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Norris has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Norris v. Baskerville , No. CA-01-616-AM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 18, 2002 & entered Apr. 19, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002








The
undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q of Weststar
Financial Services Corporation (the "Registrant”) for the quarter ended March
31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant on the dates and for the
periods presented therein.








WESTSTAR
      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATIONDate:
      May 13, 2009
            By:
            /s/     G. Gordon
      GreenwoodG.
      Gordon GreenwoodPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer





26