alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Southern Vanguard 24 Exercise Begins in Brazil

/ Published Nov. 8, 2023

MACAPA, Brazil - Standing under the Brazilian sun, Soldiers assigned to Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), stood at close interval in formation as Brazilian Army Gen. Luciano Ghuilherme, the Military Command Northern commander, officially declared the start of Southern Vanguard 24, the morning of Nov. 6.

“It is with great joy that I witness this important day and welcome all these important this vibrant and well-prepared troop assembled before us,” Ghuilherme said.

The soldiers standing in formation represented a fraction of the 1,300 participating in the exercise from both armies. The training audience for this year’s iteration of Southern Vanguard includes 300 Soldiers assigned from U.S. Army South, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), 7th Special Forces Group, 1st Security Forces Assistance Brigade and New York Army National Guard Soldiers.

For two weeks, U.S. Army Soldiers will train alongside Brazilian Army partners, conducting air assault and urban operations and weapons familiarization.

Southern Vanguard is a SOUTHCOM-sponsored, annual exercise at the operational and tactical levels to increase interoperability between U.S and Western Hemisphere forces — in this instance, Brazil.

“Exercising together allows our armies to increase interoperability and demonstrates a shared commitment to rehearsing our rapid deployment capabilities and refining procedures while providing an excellent venue to improve readiness and prepare to respond to a crisis or contingency,” said Brig. Gen. Isabel Smith, director of joint staff for the New York National Guard.

This is the second time since its inception in 2021 that the partner nations have come together in Brazil for Southern Vanguard, which is occurring in conjunction with Brazil’s annual combined operations rotational exercise 23.

CORE is the result of a cooperation program signed between Brazil and the United States. The first edition took place in Southeast Brazil in 2021, and the second took place at Joint Readiness Training Center at Fort Johnson, Louisiana, in 2022.

“In the following days, we will be experiencing the third edition in the Northern region of Brazil,” Ghuilherme said. “We will be in the heart of Eastern Amazon!”
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this
periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.   March 13, 2008
  /s/ Stephanie G.
  DiMarcoStephanie G. DiMarcoPrincipal Executive
  Officer and President, andPrincipal Financial
  Officer   A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advent
Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Afghanistan: Oklahoma National Guard, Afghan National army join forces to weaken insurgency

/ Published Dec. 7, 2011

PAKTYA PROVINCE, Afghanistan - National Guard Soldiers and Afghan National army soldiers kicked off a joint mission, known as Operation Shamshir III, here Nov. 28.

The mission, incorporating the Oklahoma National Guard's 1st Battalion, 279th Infantry Regiment, Task Force Creek, and ANA's 3rd Coy, 1st Kandak, was intended to deny enemy strongholds and destroy caches of weapons and ammunition.

The objectives of their mission were based on intelligence and civil affairs reporting that showed where likely places for strongholds and caches could be found. ANA and U.S. soldiers, acting on these reports, executed a large-scale search that resulted in the capture of several assault rifles, rocket-propelled grenades and artillery rounds, thousands of rounds of small-arms ammunition, and materials for making improvised explosive devices.

One lasting effect of the mission is that the elimination of the weapons will make it more difficult for the insurgency to restart combat operations during the upcoming fighting season, said Army National Guard 1st Lt. Joshua Starks, commander of Company B, 1st Battalion, 279th Infantry Regiment, TF Creek.

"Operation Shamshir III was a successful strike on the enemy's ability to quickly reengage fighting after the winter," Starks said.

Army National Guard Lt. Col. Chuck Booze, the TF Creek commander, attributed the success of the operation to the local villagers' negative opinion of the insurgency.

"This is a classic example of the population's distrust of the insurgency and cooperation with the ANA and coalition forces to rid the area of weapons and IED materials," Booze said.

"At present, security is the villagers' greatest concern in our area," said ANA Maj. Gulam Habib, the 3rd Coy commander.

"With this successful operation," he said, "[Afghan National Security Forces] will be able to reduce the enemy's ability to intimidate and threaten the local population."
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1


                             BRISTOL HOTEL COMPANY
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       YEAR ENDED          ELEVEN MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    DECEMBER 31, 1996       DECEMBER 31, 1995
                                                                    -----------------      --------------------

<S>                                                                     <C>                       <C>
Net Income ........................................................     $17,749                   $ 3,061
                                                                        =======                   =======

Primary earnings per common share:
      Shares used in computing earnings per share:
           Weighted average number of shares outstanding ..........      16,566                    11,905
           Incremental shares attributed to outstanding options,
             Less shares assumed purchased at average market ......         452                        33
                                                                        -------                   -------
                                                                         17,018                    11,938
                                                                        =======                   =======

      Earnings per common and common equivalent shares ............     $  1.04                   $  0.26
                                                                        =======                   =======

Fully diluted earnings per common share:
      Shares used in computing earnings per share:
           Weighted average number of shares outstanding ..........      16,566                    11,905
           Incremental shares attributed to outstanding options,
             less shares assumed purchased at higher of average
             or ending market .....................................         509                       232
                                                                        -------                   -------
                                                                         17,075                    12,137
                                                                        =======                   =======

      Earnings per common and common equivalent shares ............     $  1.04                   $  0.25
                                                                        =======                   =======
</TABLE>
NO. 12-20-00265-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JOHN ROBERT CHISENHALL, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 123RD 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SHELBY COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, John Robert Chisenhall, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is 

signed by Appellant and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal.

Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered December 16, 2020.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 16, 2020

NO. 12-20-00265-CR

JOHN ROBERT CHISENHALL,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 123rd District Court

of Shelby County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 18CR20826)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 30, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Christian David Heitzman, Minneapolis, Minnesota*, to retain 25 percent or more of the shares of First BancShares, Inc., of Cold Spring, Cold Spring, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly retain control of Granite Community Bank, Cold Spring, Minnesota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 9, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-08623 Filed 4-14-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
II 

Calendar No. 240 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3767 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 17, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 170 North Main Street in Smithfield, Utah, 

as the ‘‘W. Hazen Hillyard Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. W. HAZEN HILLYARD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 170 North Main Street in Smith6 field, Utah, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘W. 

7 Hazen Hillyard Post Office Building’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3767 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘W. Hazen Hillyard 

5 Post Office Building’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 240 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3767 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Smithfield, Utah, as the ‘‘W. Hazen Hillyard al Service located at 170 North Main Street in 

DECEMBER 17, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
06871

#### The EDGEFIELD COUNTY WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, Respondent v. The CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, South Carolina, Appellant.

(345 S. E. (2d) 260)

Court of Appeals

*Kelly F. Zier,*of *Fox, Zier, Burkhalter, Hatcher & Ver-enes,*North Augusta, *for appellant.*

*Joe F. Anderson, Jr., of Anderson & Anderson,*Edgefield, *for respondent.*

Heard March 25, 1986.

Decided June 16, 1986.

1

 Our earlier opinion in this case, No. 0687, filed April 21, 1986, is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted therefor.

Shaw, Judge:

The issue on appeal is whether the circuit court judge erred in affirming a master’s finding that appellant City of North Augusta (City) should be enjoined from constructing a water storage tank within the service district of re*149spondent Edgefield County Water and Sewer Authority (Authority). We affirm.

The City proposed to purchase property to construct a 500,000 gallon water storage tank. After a study, the best and most cost effective site was one located within the service district of the Authority. The City has no plans to expand its services into the Authority’s district and claims the placing of the water tank in the Authority’s service district would pose no threat nor attempt to invade the province of the Authority’s services. Also, the City asserts the cost saving should be a factor in the ultimate decision. We disagree.

The Authority petitioned for an injunction against construction of the water tank.

The sole issue is whether the General Assembly intended for the word “facility” to embrace the City’s proposed water tanks. A “facility” is a very inclusive term, embracing anything which aids or makes easier the performance of a duty. *Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission, C.C.A.,*131 F. (2d) 953, 960, 961. The word “facility” means something that is built or installed to perform some particular function. *Raynor v. American Heritage Life Ins. Co.,*123 Ga. App. 247, 180 S. E. (2d) 248, 250.

In creating the Authority (1967 S. C. Acts 571, Section 13), the General Assembly provided in pertinent part:

> [a]ll municipalities, public bodies and public agencies operating water district systems in and adjacent to Edgefield County shall be fully empowered to enter into contracts to buy water from the Authority_No municipality or other agency operating water systems shall extend its present facilities beyond the corporate limits without prior written approval of the Authority.

In the interpretation of statutes the court’s sole function is to determine and, within constitutional limits, give effect to the intention of the legislature, with reference to the meaning of the language used and the subject matter and purposes of the statute. *State v. Carrigan,*284 S. C. 610, 328 S. E. (2d) 119 (Ct. App. 1985).

We hold the tank constitutes a “facility” embraced by the statute and is barred.

*150We hold the primary purpose of the statute is to regulate competition between the Authority and potential area water suppliers. The cost-benefit analysis argued by the City is irrelevant to the governing statute.

Affirmed.

Cureton and Goolsby, JJ., concur.
Alaska National Guard SPP with Mongolia uniquely positive
 
  By Air National Guard Maj. Guy Hayes
  CAMP DENALI, Alaska - The Alaska National Guard hosted the U.S. Ambassador to Mongolia here Oct. 18-21, helping to strengthen an already positive relationship between the United States and Mongolia. The Honorable Jonathan Addleton made his first visit to Alaska to meet National Guard, community, and state leaders. "The Alaska and Mongolia partnership is regarded in the Pentagon as one of the strongest relationships," Addleton said. "It's really an inspired relationship, where the initial military contacts have become the platform for something very different." Something different indeed - Addleton, who also visited with Alaska National Guard Soldiers acting as liaisons to Mongolians in Kabul earlier this year, feels the partnership is a bridge connecting the two countries. "The reality is that Mongolia and Alaska are similar in some respects," Addleton said. "They are physically the same size, relatively sparsely populated and have logistics requirements that are sometimes daunting. You have the mineral driven economy in both cases, and Alaska's experience in all that offers something to Mongolia as well." Army Maj. Wayne Don, the Alaska National Guard State Partnership director, feels the Ambassador's visit was important because it went beyond the security aspect of the military to military relationship and focused on the economy and education too. "It was important to look at the programs and linkages outside of a strict security relationship between Alaska and Mongolia," Don said. "We have a sister city relationship between Erdenet and Fairbanks, an agreement with the Mongolian University of Science and Technology and the University of Alaska Fairbanks. "There are also a growing number of students on both the University of Alaska Fairbanks and University of Alaska Anchorage campuses because of the relationship." A program that began as a military to military relationship has now created exceptional opportunities for both countries, and according to Addleton both sides benefit from the relationship. "Without a doubt in terms of the broader bilateral relationship between our two countries, the state partnership program is a positive dimension," Addleton said. "If this is sustained, it will continue to strengthen. It has already come a long ways and I suspect it will come even further in the years ahead."
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

 

I, David C. Collins, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofLearning Tree International, Inc.; 

 

2. Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: December 14, 2004
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-1004

                             --------------------
                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT

    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                         Date of Report: July 25, 2002


                         FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION
            (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



            Nevada                    1-12006                88-0244792
    (State of incorporation)  (Commission file number)   (I.R.S.Employer
                                                        Identification No.)



                  733 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10017
                   (Address of principal executive offices)
                                  (Zip Code)



                                (212) 599-8000
             (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

<PAGE>

Item 5.  OTHER EVENTS
         ------------

         See attached Exhibit 99.


Item 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
         ---------------------------------

         (C)  Exhibits:

              99     Press Release of Financial Federal Corporation dated
                     July 25, 2002


                                   EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.       Description of Exhibit
-----------       ----------------------------------------------------
 99               Press Release of Financial Federal Corporation dated
                  July 25, 2002

                                       2
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                       FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION


                                       By:  /s/ Steven F. Groth
                                            -------------------------
                                            Senior Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            (Principal Financial
                                            Officer)

July 29, 2002
------------
(Date)

                                        3