alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-18485) pertaining to the Covance Inc. Employee Equity Participation
Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-18487) pertaining to The
Stock Purchase Plan of Covance Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-18493) pertaining to the Covance Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-29467) pertaining to the Covance Inc.
Conversion Equity Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-33185)
pertaining to the Covance Inc. Restricted Share Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-36469) pertaining to the Covance Inc. Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90777)
pertaining to the Covance Inc. Deferred Stock Unit Plan for Non-Employee Members
of the Board of Directors, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-90779) pertaining to the Covance Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90781) pertaining to the
Covance Inc. Director's Restricted Stock Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-36586) pertaining to the Covance Inc. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan and the Covance Inc. 2000 Employee Equity Participation Plan of our report
dated January 18, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Covance Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.




                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


MetroPark, New Jersey
February 28, 2002
SONS-EX 10.12 2013.03.29




Exhibit 10.12
Mr. Anthony Scarfo
By electronic delivery
 


Dear Tony:
 
Based on your desire to demonstrate your support for Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) and its prospects, the Compensation Committee has considered and will agree to your request to forgo the payment of your cash bonus for 2013 and, if any such bonus would have been earned, to instead accept a grant of shares of the Company’s common stock.
 
The August 18, 2011 employment agreement, as amended (your “Agreement”), outlining the terms and conditions of your employment by the Company is hereby amended as follows:
 
		
	1.  
	You have elected to receive your fiscal year 2013 bonus (“2013 Bonus”), if any is earned, in the form of shares of the Company’s common stock (“2013 Bonus Shares”), which will be granted and have the terms described below:


 
		
	a.
	The number of 2013 Bonus Shares granted will equal 1.5 times your actual 2013 Bonus earned, which bonus shall be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion subject to the terms of the 2013 bonus program, divided by the closing price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant.




		
	b.
	The 2013 Bonus Shares will be granted and vest in full on the grant date, which shall be concurrent with the timing of normal 2013 bonus payouts.


 
Notwithstanding any provisions in your employment agreement, as amended, you must remain an employee of the Company on the grant date in order to receive the 2013 Bonus Shares (if earned).  The parties hereby acknowledge that the Compensation Committee retains the right, in its sole discretion, to pay your 2013 Bonus in cash pursuant to the terms of your Agreement as opposed to payment in 2013 Bonus Shares; provided that, if the Company is the subject of an acquisition or change of control prior to the grant date, if the Compensation Committee of the Company (or its successor) elects to pay the 2013 Bonus, if any, in cash, such cash payment will equal 1.5 times your actual 2013 Bonus earned, if any.  


Except as modified by the terms of this letter agreement, the terms of you employment, including without limitation, the terms reflected in the Agreement and all Company plans, programs and policies, will remain unaltered and in full force and effect.  Capitalized terms not defined in this letter have the same definitions given to them in the Agreement.
 
Very truly yours,
 
/s/ Raymond P. Dolan 





	
		
	 
	 

	Raymond P. Dolan
	 

	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 

	 
	 

	ACCEPTED:
	 

	 
/s/ Anthony Scarfo
	

 03/28/2013

	 
	 

	Anthony Scarfo
	Date
dxpe_drleip-amend2.htm






  





  











  








Exhibit 10.1







Amendment Two to David Little Equity Incentive Program








On May 1, 2013, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DXP Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") amended an equity incentive program under which David R. Little could earn an award of up to $700,000 of common stock under the 2005 Restricted Stock Plan each year for three years.  The amendment changed the value of the maximum annual award from $700,000 to 15,000 shares.  This amendment also modified the percentages of the maximum award to be awarded at various sales and net income growth levels.







The shares will be awarded on March 31 of each year.  The number of shares for each award will be determined based upon the growth in sales and net income for the preceding fiscal year.  If sales and net income each increase by 20% or more from the preceding fiscal year, 15,000 shares will be awarded.  Growth of less than 10% in sales and net income will result in an award of zero.  Growth of between 10% and 20% will result in an award between zero and 15,000 shares.  The awarded shares vest in three equal installments on the anniversary date.  The first award under this amended
three year program will be issued on March 31, 2014.








	  	
Sales Growth Percentage


	
Net 


Income 


Growth

	
%

	
< 10

	
10 - 12

	
>12 – 14

	
>14 - 16

	
>16 - 18

	
>18 – 20

	
>20


	
<10

	
0

	
0

	
10

	
10

	
15

	
15

	
20


	
10 – 12

	
10

	
35

	
40

	
45

	
50

	
55

	
60


	
>12 – 14

	
15

	
40

	
45

	
50

	
55

	
60

	
70


	
>14 – 16

	
20

	
45

	
50

	
55

	
60

	
70

	
80


	
>16 – 18

	
25

	
50

	
55

	
60

	
70

	
80

	
90


	
>18 – 20

	
25

	
55

	
60

	
70

	
80

	
90

	
95


	
>20

	
25

	
60

	
65

	
80

	
90

	
95

	
100












EXECUTED effective the 1st day of May, 2013.







DXP ENTERPRISES, INC.







By:         /s/Mac McConnell


Mac McConnell







Title:     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-710

In Re: ROBERT GLENN ROBERTSON, a/k/a K.O.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-44)

Submitted: October 14, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Glenn Robertson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Glenn Robertson filed this mandamus petition seeking an

order from this court compelling the district court to act on his

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) motion. Because there

has been significant action in his case in the district court as

recently as September 10, 1997, we conclude that Robertson's petition is moot. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,091,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,303,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                   148,390
<INVENTORY>                                  3,911,107
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,093,346
<PP&E>                                       4,656,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                 320,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,788,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,259,798
<BONDS>                                      5,835,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       196,944
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,496,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,788,234
<SALES>                                     13,151,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,151,701
<CGS>                                        8,445,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,445,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,708,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               619,160
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             762,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,064,478)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   110,223
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,174,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (387,514)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,562,215)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.79)
        

</TABLE>
SCEC-20-0000507

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

BRIAN EVANS, Plaintiff,

vs.

KAIALI#I (KAI) KAHELE, Defendant.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

OF ORDER OF THIS COURT FILED OCTOBER 2, 2020

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.,

 and Circuit Judge Ashford, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the Motion for Reconsideration of

Order of This Court Filed October 2, 2020, the papers in support,

and the records and files herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 9, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

 /s/ James H. Ashford 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCEC-20-0000507

09-OCT-2020

03:09 PM
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Ming S. Liu, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:May 15, 2007By:/s/Ming Sun LiuMing Sun Liu, Chairman, Director, President and CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RAYTEL
MEDICAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,840<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,218
<PP&E>                                          48,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,831
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,597
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,950
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (186)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                       603
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,158
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (4,960)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,802)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)
<FN>
<F1>(RECEIVABLES) REPRESENTS NET RECEIVABLES
<F2>(LOSS PROVISION) INCLUDED IN (TOTAL COSTS)
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Jean
Perrotti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.       the
Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.       the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:  Date:
      May 27, 2010
              /s/
      Jean PerrottiName:  Jean
      PerrottiTitle:
      Chief Financial OfficerAnd
      Principle Accounting Officer
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY (AFFSA)

01 Jun 12

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/ARM-100

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3OF 6500 South MacArthur (AJW31AF) Bldg 4, Room 124 Oklahoma City, OK 73169

SUBJECT: 14 CFR Exemption 7389 (Docket No. FAA-2000-8187)

14 CFR Exemption 7389 was granted to the United States Air Force on 28 Nov 2000 and exempts the USAF from the provisions of S ection 91.169(b), allowing the Air Force to conduct local area and other flight training missions under instrument flight rules without designating an alternate airport, subject to certain conditions and limitations. The exemption was last renewed 22 Sep 2010 (7389E) and expires 30 Nov 12. The requirement for the Air Force to conduct operations under this exemption remains unchanged, and we request a 3-year extension IAW 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 11.

Please contact me with any questions at e-mail: hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil or by telephone at (405) 739-9783. We appreciate your assistance.

ALEX E. KRAUSE, Maj, USAF Chief, Flight Standards Division
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1657

BRETT C. KIMBERLIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MITCH MCCONNELL; CHARLES GRASSLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. George J. Hazel, District Judge. 

(8:16-cv-01211-GJH)

Submitted: November 30, 2016 Decided: December 7, 2016

Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brett C. Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brett C. Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his complaint for lack of standing. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kimberlin v. 

McConnell, No. 8:16-cv-01211-GJH (D. Md. June 3, 2016). We deny

the motion to appoint counsel and the motion to intervene. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-66374) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-56996 and
333-81848) of deCODE genetics, Inc. of our report dated April 2, 2003 relating
to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Selected
Financial Data" in this Form 10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
April 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles S. Wiesenhart Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of its annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:

a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: April 2, 2007



/S/    CHARLES S. WIESENHART
JR.Charles S. Wiesenhart Jr. Chief Financial Officer and Vice President-Finance (Principal Financial
Officer)