OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Review Draft

Data to the left of the orange column in this tab are NEI inventory data to be updated according to the instructions in section D2 of the survey overview document. EPA will use the NEI data to determine residual risk for the pulp and paper source category. 

Do not over-write gray shaded NEI data. 

Facility data from the NEI to be reviewed and revised. Follow instructions in section D2 of the survey overview document to populate this table to the right of the orange column. 

Instruction:

Email address for person 

providing comments

A general descriptive comment on 

the revision

Name of person providing 

comments

Commenter's affiliation - 

state/local/agency, trade 

association, company, etc.

Phone number for person 

providing comments

Survey overview reference:

Field: Commenter Email Address Commenter General Comment Commenter Name Commenter Organization Commenter Phone Number

Example entry: jane.doe@amymillusa.com Jane Doe Anymill USA 999-999-9999

Facility EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 1 of 101
Yes/No

e survey overview document for submitting CBI.

dual risk for the pulp and paper source category. 

See State and County 

FIPS tab in Lookups 

for P&P Survey.xls

See Tribal Code tab 

in Lookups for P&P 

Survey.xls

See Tribal Code tab 

in Lookups for P&P 

Survey.xls

Enter revised Tribal 

Code here

Two-character 

alphabetical code 

for state

County name for 

MACT facility

Enter revised county 

name here

See State and 

County FIPS tab in 

Lookups for P&P 

Survey.xls

Unique identifier 

assigned by EPA to 

NEI Facility

The ID number 

assigned by the EPA 

Facility Registry 

System. FRS IDs can 

be found at: 

http://www.epa.gov/envi

ro/html/facility.html. 

Enter revised 

Facility Registry 

Identifier here

01 - MAJOR (HAP 

emitting facility) 

02 - Area (HAP 

emitting facility)

Definition 

associated with 

Facility Category 

Code

For the facility code 

us one of the 

following:

01 - MAJOR (HAP 

emitting facility) 

02 - Area (HAP 

emitting facility)

EPA Region Tribal Code Tribe Name

REVISED Tribal 

Code State Abbreviation County Name

REVISED County 

Name State County FIPs NEI Site ID

Facility Registry 

Identifier

REVISED Facility 

Registry Identifier Facility Category

Facility Category 

Description

REVISED Facility 

Category Code

3 000 Non-Tribal Area VA Amherst County 51009 99999 110020689999 01

MAJOR (HAP 

emitting facility)

Facility EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 2 of 101
The name of the facility 

of the MACT facility

Enter revised 

Facility Name here

Physical street address 

for MACT facility

City where the 

MACT facility is 

located

State where MACT 

facility is located

Zip Code for the 

MACT facility

Enter revised 

Location Address 

here

Enter revised city 

name here

Enter revised State 

here

Enter revised Zip 

Code here

Indicate the year 

closed if the facility 

is no longer in 

operation 

(permanently 

closed)

Facility Name

REVISED Facility 

Name Location Address City State Zip Code

REVISED Location 

Address REVISED City REVISED State REVISED Zip Code Closed Year

Anymill USA 1000 Plant Road Anytown VA 24553

Facility EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 3 of 101
Pulp and Paper sector facility data. Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table to the right of the orange column. 

Instruction: Name of legal operator of facility Complete street address of facility (physical location)

Survey overview reference:

Field: Legal operator Physical address Physical city

Physical 

state Physical zip

Physical 

county

Example entry: Gaint Corporation 1000 Plant Road Anytown VA 24553 Amherst

Pull down menu text located below this line

Facility EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 4 of 101
Provide mailing address if different than physical location Facility contact able to answer technical questions about the completed survey

Mail address Mail city

Mail 

state Mail zip Mail county Facility contact name Facility contact title

Facility contact 

phone

Facility 

contact 

ext

Facility 

contact fax Facility contact email

PO Box 123 Fairspring VA 24554 Amherst Joe Smith Environmental Manager 999-999-9999 456 999-999-8888 joe.smith@anymillusa.com

Facility EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 5 of 101
If not the same as legal operator, provide name and address of legal owner of this facility

Dun and Bradstreet 

Number for the legal 

owner of this mill (see 

TRI Form R)

(Optional) Dun and 

Bradstreet Number for 

this mill (if the mill has 

its own Dun and 

Bradstreet Number)

If you operate a non-major source, 

follow the instructions for notifying 

EPA to determine if you should 

complete this survey.

See subpart A definition of "major 

source" in survey attachment 2. 

"Area" is not major without controls. 

"Synthetic minor" is not major 

considering controls.

The primary NAICS code represents the line of business that generates the 

most income for the facility.

Legal owner address Legal owner city

Legal 

owner 

state

Legal 

owner zip

Dun Bradstreet 

owner Dun Bradstreet mill HAP size classification Primary NAICS

100 Corporate Blvd Green Bay WI 54304 9020777 149810921 major 322121-Paper (except Newsprint) Mills

major 322110-Pulp Mills

area (true) 322121-Paper (except Newsprint) Mills

synthetic minor 322122-Newsprint Mills

not known 322130-Paperboard Mills

322211-Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing

322212-Folding Paperboard Box Manufacturing

322213-Setup Paperboard Box Manufacturing

322214-Fiber Can, Tube, Drum, and Similar Products Manufacturing

322215-Non-Folding Sanitary Food Container Manufacturing

322221-Coated and Laminated Packaging Paper Manufacturing

322222-Coated and Laminated Paper Manufacturing

322223-Coated Paper Bag and Pouch Manufacturing

322224-Uncoated Paper and Multiwall Bag Manufacturing

322225-Laminated Aluminum Foil Manufacturing for Flexible Packaging Uses

322226-Surface-Coated Paperboard Manufacturing

322231-Die-Cut Paper and Paperboard Office Supplies Manufacturing

322232-Envelope Manufacturing

322233-Stationery, Tablet, and Related Product Manufacturing

322291-Sanitary Paper Product Manufacturing

322299-All Other Converted Paper Product Manufacturing

Facility EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 6 of 101
Size of entity. Enter the 

approximate number of employees 

(worldwide) of the business 

enterprise that owns this facility, 

including where applicable, the 

parent company and all 

subsidiaries, branches, and 

unrelated establishments owned by 

the parent company. Please count 

full-time, part-time, and temporary 

employees equally.

Enter the number of 

facility employees (fulltime, part-time, and 

temporary employees 

should be counted 

equally)

The small business size standards for NAICS 322 are based on number of 

employees of the parent company: 750 employees for NAICS 322110-

322130, 322212, and 322215; and 500 employees for all other 322xxx 

NAICS. See also survey Attachment 3.

Worldwide employees Facility employees Small business

P&P 

NESHAP 

subpart S

Combustion 

Source NESHAP 

subpart MM

Paper/web 

coating 

NESHAP 

subpart 

JJJJ

Boiler 

NESHAP 

subpart 

DDDDD

Other 

NESHAP (list 

subparts)

Kraft NSPS 

subpart BB

Boiler 

NSPS

Other NSPS (list 

subparts)

>1000 500-749 no Applies Applies Applies Applies N/A Applies Db N/A

<50 <50 yes Applies Applies Applies Applies Applies D

50-99 50-99 no N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Da N/A

100-499 100-499 don’t know Db

500-749 500-749 Dc

750-999 750-999

>1000 >1000

Federal rule coverage. Indicate "applies" for each federal NESHAP and NSPS that apply at the mill. Mark "N/A" if not 

applicable. For the others list as such "Subpart __"

Facility EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 7 of 101
Pulps

Select yes/no Select yes/no Select yes/no Select yes/no

Select from menu. You may write in more 

than once choice.

Bleaching 

systems

Does the mill 

produce virgin 

pulp?

Does the mill produce 

pulp from secondary post 

consumer fiber?

Does the mill 

purchase virgin pulp?

Does the mill purchase 

secondary fiber pulp? Types of market pulp produced by the mill

Is bleaching 

performed at the 

mill?

yes no no no N/A yes

yes yes yes yes Dissolving pulp yes

no no no no Softwood chemical market pulp no

Hardwood chemical market pulp

Mechanical market pulp

Market pulp from secondary (recycled) fiber

N/A

can be more than one

Facility EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 8 of 101
Natural gas supply

Paper or paperboard 

processes/products

Enter decimal percent 

for utilization (e.g., 0.7 

for 70% of capacity 

utilized)

Enter decimal percent 

for utilization (e.g., 0.7 

for 70% of capacity 

utilized) for the past 5 

years. To determine 

the 5-year utilization, 

average the utilization 

percentages for 2005, 

2006, 2007, 2008, 

and 2009.

Type of natural gas supply available to 

the mill

Total number of paper 

machines

2009 total 

paper/paperboard 

capacity (short 

tons/year) 

2009 

paper/paperboard 

capacity utilization 

percentage

5-year average (2005-

2009) 

paper/paperboard 

capacity utilization 

percentage

Table 1 totals 

should match 

column I.14. 

This column 

provides a 

check. 

pipeline 1 340000 0.8 0.95 340000

pipeline

local distribution company (e.g., truck delivery)

none (natural gas is currently unavailable)

Facility EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 9 of 101
Enter 2009 total mill 

capacity of each paper 

grade below for all 

paper machines 

including idle machines 

in 2009 (st/yr - short 

tons per year). 

Use the paper grades most 

closely related to the paper 

grades produced at your 

mill if you do not find an 

exact match.

Specify other paper 

grade(s) if none of 

the grades to the 

left reasonably 

match the grades 

produced at your 

mill

Enter capacity for 

"other" paper 

grade(s)

newsprint (short 

tons/year)

coated free sheet (short 

tons/year)

uncoated free 

sheet (short 

tons/year)

coated 

groundwood 

(short 

tons/year)

uncoated 

groundwood 

(short 

tons/year)

tissue & 

sanitary 

(short 

tons/year)

specialty 

packaging & 

industrial (short 

tons/year)

kraft packaging 

(short tons/year)

linerboard 

(short 

tons/year)

corrugating 

medium (short 

tons/year)

solid bleached 

board (short 

tons/year)

recycled board 

(short 

tons/year)

construction 

paper and board 

(short tons/year)

other (specify 

type)

other (short 

tons/year)

340000

Facility EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 10 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Review Draft

Data to the left of the orange column in this tab are NEI inventory data to be updated according to the instructions in section D2 of the survey overview document. EPA will use the NEI data to determine residual risk for the pulp and paper source categor

Do not over-write gray shaded NEI data. 

Inventory data from the NEI to be reviewed and revised.

Instruction:

OPTIONAL. Use this 

column for 

comments related to 

emissions. 

OPTIONAL. Use this 

column for 

comments related to 

the process. 

OPTIONAL. Use this 

column for 

comments related to 

stack configuration. 

Unique ID number used 

by a state/local/tribal 

agency to identify a 

facility

Unique identifier 

assigned by EPA 

to NEI Facility

The name of the 

facility of the MACT 

facility

See the SIC tab in 

Lookups for P&P 

Survey.xls

See the SIC tab in 

Lookups for P&P 

Survey.xls

Survey overview 

reference:

Field:

CommentEmissions Comment-Process Comment-Stack State Facility Identifier NEI Site ID Facility Name SIC CodeSIC Code 

Description

Example entry: 00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

00022 99999 Anymill USA 2631

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 11 of 101
Yes/No

r submitting CBI.

ne residual risk for the pulp and paper source category. 

North American Industry Classification Code. An industry 

classification system, NAICS is erected on a production-oriented 

conceptual framework that groups establishments into industries 

according to similarity in the process used to produce goods or 

services. 

See Lookups for P&P survey.xls or Attachment 3 to the P&P survey 

instructions.

Unique ID reported 

consistently over 

time by

state/local/tribal 

agency

Enter description of the emission unit. 

Use this field to identify emission units for 

which SCCs are not available or are 

assigned generic or "not-elsewhereclassified" SCCs. See the survey 

overview document for additional 

instructions.

Indicate the general type of emission 

process associated with the specified 

emission point (e.g., Kraft Pulping, 

Causticizing, Semichemical Pulping, etc). 

See the "P&P Att 1 with SCC" and "All 

11575 SCC" tabs in Lookups for P&P 

survey.xls for a listing of Emission Process 

Groups crosswalked with the SCCs.

NAICS Code Emission Unit ID Emission Unit Description REVISED Emission Unit Description Emission Process Group

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER Residual Oil

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

322130 1 BLR01 B&W (NORTH) BOILER

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 12 of 101
Unique ID reported 

consistently over 

time by state/local/ 

tribal agency

Source Classification 

Code. 

See Lookups for 

P&P survey.xls and 

the pulp and paper 

survey instructions.

Enter revised SCC 

Code here.

See Lookups for 

P&P survey.xls and 

the pulp and paper 

survey instructions.

Descriptive text 

associated with SCC 

code

State/local/tribal ID for 

point/location where 

emissions are released to 

ambient air

The code for physical 

configuration of the 

release point:

1 - Fugitive

2 - Vertical

3 - Horizontal

4 - Goose Neck

5 - Vertical with Rain Cap

6 - Downward-facing Vent

99 - Unknown 

Descriptive text for 

EmissionReleasePointTyp

e code:

1 - Fugitive

2 - Vertical

3 - Horizontal

4 - Goose Neck

5 - Vertical with Rain Cap

6 - Downward-facing Vent

99 - Unknown 

This column is included for informational purposes to 

reflect what is included in prior versions of the 

inventory. Emission unit descriptions should be 

entered into the "REVISED Emission Unit 

Description" column.

Process ID SCC REVISED SCC SCC Description Emission Release Point ID

Emission Release Point 

Type

Emission Release Point 

Type Description EMISSION_RELEASE_PT_DESCRIPT

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

1 10200401 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

2 10200601 1 02 BOILERS-NORTH AND SOUTH

K 30700199 KR-1 02

K 30700199 KR-1 02

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 13 of 101
Start date of the 

period in which 

reported emissions 

occur, e.g., 

20050101 = January 

1, 2005

End date of the 

period in which 

reported emissions 

occur, e.g., 

20051231 = 

December 31, 2005

Enter revised Start 

Date here

Enter revised End 

Date here

Code assigned by EPA to 

individual pollutants. See 

The Pollutant tab in 

Lookups for P&P 

Survey.xls

Enter revised 

Pollutant Code here

Descriptive text associated with pollutant code. See The Pollutant 

tab in Lookups for P&P Survey.xls

Start Date End Date REVISED Start Date REVISED End Date Pollutant Code

REVISED Pollutant 

Code Pollutant_Code_Desc

20020101 20021231 20090101 20091231 PM10-FIL Primary PM10, Filterable Portion Only

20020101 20021231 CO Carbon Monoxide

20020101 20021231 NH3 Ammonia

20020101 20021231 NOX Nitrogen Oxides

20020101 20021231 PM10-FIL Primary PM10, Filterable Portion Only

20020101 20021231 PM10-PRI Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles)

20020101 20021231 PM25-FIL Primary PM2.5, Filterable Portion Only

20020101 20021231 PM25-PRI Primary PM2.5 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles)

20020101 20021231 PM-CON Primary PM Condensible Portion Only (All Less Than 1 Micron)

20020101 20021231 SO2 Sulfur Dioxide

20020101 20021231 VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

20050101 20051231 226 Nickel & Compounds

20050101 20051231 7439921 Lead

20020101 20021231 CO Carbon Monoxide

20020101 20021231 NH3 Ammonia

20020101 20021231 NOX Nitrogen Oxides

20020101 20021231 PM10-FIL Primary PM10, Filterable Portion Only

20020101 20021231 PM10-PRI Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles)

20020101 20021231 PM25-FIL Primary PM2.5, Filterable Portion Only

20020101 20021231 PM25-PRI Primary PM2.5 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles)

20020101 20021231 PM-CON Primary PM Condensible Portion Only (All Less Than 1 Micron)

20020101 20021231 SO2 Sulfur Dioxide

20020101 20021231 VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

20050101 20051231 50000 Formaldehyde

20050101 20051231 7439976 Mercury

20050101 20051231 7440439 Cadmium

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 14 of 101
Broader grouping to which an individual chemical 

compound is assigned to by EPA. For example, “lead 

and compounds” contains all pollutants containing 

lead.

Numeric value of 

routine emissions in 

tons/year

Enter revised routine 

emissions value here

Use one of the following Emission Calculation Method Codes:

01 - CEMS - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM

02 - ENGINEERING JUDGMENT

03 - MATERIAL BALANCE

04 - STACK TEST

05 - EPA SPECIATION PROFILE

06 - STATE/LOCAL SPECIATION PROFILE

07 - MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATION

08 - EPA EMISSION FACTOR

09 - STATE/LOCAL EMISSION FACTOR

10 - SITE-SPECIFIC EMISSION FACTOR

11 - VENDER EMISSION FACTOR

12 - TRADE GROUP EMISSION FACTOR

Maximum hourly 

emission rate for 

routine emissions.

Emissions that 

occurred during 

startup periods.

Maximum hourly 

emission rate for 

startup period 

emissions.

HAP_CATEGORY_NAME Emissions (TPY)

Routine Emissions 

(TPY) Emission Calculation Method Code For Revised Emissions

Routine Emissions 

Max Hourly Rate 

(lbs per hour)

Startup Emissions 

(TPY)

Startup Emissions 

Max Hourly Rate 

(lbs per hour)

PM 0.314416647 8.56 04 0.51 8.5

CO 0.9375

NH3 0.15

NOX 8.813

PM 0.314416647

PM 2.156

PM 0.314416647

PM 2.156

PM 1.841583252

SO2 32.381

VOC 0.0525

Nickel Compounds 0.116568

Lead Compounds 0.002083

CO 41.916

NH3 1.597

NOX 139.72

PM 0.947999954

PM 1.108910486

PM 0.947999954

PM 1.108910486

PM 0.160910532

SO2 0.2994

VOC 2.745

Formaldehyde 0.0000375

Mercury Compounds 0.00014016

Cadmium Compounds 0.00063072

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 15 of 101
Emissions that 

occurred during 

shutdown periods.

Maximum hourly 

emission rate for 

shutdown period 

emissions.

Emissions that 

occurred during 

periods of 

malfunction.

Maximum hourly 

emission rate for 

emissions that 

occurred during 

periods of 

malfunction.

See the MACT Code 

tab in Lookups for 

P&P Survey.xls. Use 

the MACT Code listed 

with the MACT Source 

Category description.

Enter revised MACT 

Code here. 

See the MACT Code 

tab in Lookups for 

P&P Survey.xls. 

See the MACT Code 

tab in Lookups for 

P&P Survey.xls. Use 

the MACT Source 

Category description 

listed with the MACT 

Code

The height (in feet) of 

a stack

The temperature of 

an exit gas stream 

(degree Fahrenheit)

The diameter (in 

feet) of a stack

Shutdown 

Emissions (TPY)

Shutdown 

Emissions Max 

Hourly Rate (lbs per 

hour)

Malfunction 

Emissions (TPY)

Malfunction 

Emissions Max 

Hourly Rate (lbs per 

hour) MACT Code

REVISED MACT 

Code

MACT Source 

Category Stack Height

Exit Gas 

Temperature Stack Diameter

0.23 3.8 1.6 26.7 0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-3 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

0107-2 100 400 9

1626-1 127.1208115 224.3161621 5.395833492

1626-1 127.1208115 224.3161621 5.395833492

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 16 of 101
The velocity of an 

exit gas stream (feet 

per second)

Numeric value of 

stack gas flow rate in 

actual cubic feet per 

second

The stack default code is a 5-digit code that indicates if and how the 

stack parameters were defaulted. Each digit represents a stack 

parameter in the following order: stack height, exit gas temperature, 

stack diameter, exit gas velocity, and exit gas flowrate. The individual 

digits in the string indicate the source of the defaulted parameters: 

0= Original Value, 1 = SCC Default, 2 = SIC Default, 3 = National 

Default, 4 = Calculated Value, 5 = MACT Default, 6 = State Revision, 

8 = CAMD Value. Thus, 22222 means all 5 parameters were 

defaulted using SIC Default List. 

Descriptive text 

associated with 

StackDefaultFlag

Dimension of the 

source in the eastwest (x-) direction, 

commonly referred to 

as length

Dimension of the 

source in the northsouth (y-) direction, 

commonly referred to 

as width

Release angle (clockwise 

from true North); orientation 

of the y-dimension relative 

to true North, measured 

positive for clockwise 

starting at 0 degrees 

(maximum 89 degrees); will 

assume 0 degrees if it is 

not provided in data 

submittal

Enter revised Stack 

Height here

Exit Gas Velocity Exit Gas Flow Rate Stack Default Flag

Stack Default Flag 

Description

Fugitive Length (EW) (ft)Fugitive Width (N-S) 

(ft) Fugitive Angle (degrees)

REVISED Stack 

Height (ft)

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

19.42000008 1235.199951 00000

38.29502869 875.6871948 00000

38.29502869 875.6871948 00000

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 17 of 101
Enter revised Exit 

Gas Temperature 

here

Enter revised Stack Diameter 

here

Enter revised Exit 

Gas Velocity here

Enter revised Exit 

Gas Flowrate here

Enter revised 

dimension of the 

source in the eastwest (x-) direction, 

commonly referred to 

as length

Enter revised 

dimension of the 

source in the northsouth (y-) direction, 

commonly referred to 

as width

Enter revised release 

angle (clockwise 

from true North); 

orientation of the ydimension relative to 

true North, measured 

positive for clockwise 

starting at 0 degrees 

(maximum 89 

degrees); will 

assume 0 degrees if 

it is not provided in 

data submittal

Code indicating 

source of emissions 

estimate (state, EPA, 

TRI, etc.).

See Lookups for 

P&P survey.xls 

Specify "RTR09" for 

new rows that you 

add. 

Code that represents 

the performance 

level, or operating 

scenario, for the HAP 

emissions reported. 

01 - Actual

02 - Allowable

03 - Maximum

04 - Potential

Descriptive text 

associated with code 

for HAP 

Performance Level

REVISED Exit Gas 

Temperature (F)

REVISED Stack Diameter 

(ft)

REVISED Exit Gas 

Velocity (ft/sec)

REVISED Exit Gas 

Flow Rate (cuft/sec)

REVISED Fugitive 

Length (E-W) (ft)

REVISED Fugitive 

Width (N-S) (ft)

REVISED Fugitive 

Angle (degrees) Data Source Code

HAP Emissions 

Performance Level

HAP Emissions 

Performance Level 

Description

440 22.6 1437 R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

S 01

S 01

R

R

R

R

AUGPM10FIL

R

AUGPM25FIL

R

R

R

S 01

R 01

R 01

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 18 of 101
Longitude measured in decimal 

degrees of the angular 

distance on a meridian east or 

west of the prime meridian. 

Negative (-) data point for N 

America. Include (-) sign, Ex. -

123.234561. For point sources 

this represents the center of 

the source; for fugitive sources 

this is the southwest corner if 

the fugitive angle is zero, or the 

western most corner if the 

fugitive angle is greater than 

zero.

Latitude measured in decimal 

degrees of the angular 

distance on a meridian north or 

south of the equator. Positive 

(+) data point for N America. 

Include (+) sign, Ex. 

+78.123456. For point sources 

this represents the center of 

the source; for fugitive sources 

this is the southwest corner if 

the fugitive angle is zero, or the 

western most corner if the 

fugitive angle is greater than 

zero.

Code that indicates 

source of locational 

coordinates. See 

Location Default tab 

in Lookups for P&P 

Survey.xls

Enter revised code 

that represents the 

performance level, or 

operating scenario, 

for the HAP 

emissions reported. 

01 - Actual

02 - Allowable

03 - Maximum

04 - Potential

North American 

Datum (NAD) for 

longitude and latitude 

coordinates (NAD27 

or NAD83). If left 

blank NAD83 is 

assumed.

Enter revised 

Longitude here. 

Specify decimal 

degrees to 6 digits to 

the right of the 

decimal point. 

Enter revised 

Latitude here. 

Specify decimal 

degrees to 6 digits to 

the right of the 

decimal point.

Select the most representative control 

measure code from Lookups for P&P 

Survey.xls.

Codes for some common controls are as 

follows:

127 - Fabric Filter

128 - Electrostatic Precipitator

131 - Thermal oxidizer

141 - Wet scrubber

146 - Wet Electrostatic Precipitator

150 - Mechanical Collector

Longitude (decimal degrees) Latitude (decimal degrees)

Location Default 

Flag

REVISED HAP 

Emissions 

Performance Level

North American 

Datum

REVISED Longitude 

(decimal degrees)

REVISED Latitude 

(decimal degrees) Control measure code

-78.9104538 37.51063156 01 NAD83 -78.90139008 37.51305771 128, 129

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.9104538 37.51063156

-78.90139008 37.51305771

-78.90139008 37.51305771

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 19 of 101
Provide control measure description from Lookups for 

P&P Survey.xls.

If you cannot find a representative control measure code 

from Lookups for P&P Survey.xls, then write in a 

description of the control measure in this column. 

Optional: Use this column if you 

need to describe a control that is 

not identified in the codes list 

and/or to indicate backup controls. 

Indicate here (with an 

"X") if the record 

should be deleted

Describes the reason 

for deletion

Indicate here (with an "OK") 

if the facility or record is 

correct with no changes.

Control Measure Code Description Control Measure Comment Delete Delete Comment

Is Reviewed With No 

Changes

Electrostatic Precipitator, Scrubber ESP is followed by a scrubber

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 20 of 101
Copied from left for 

convenience (DO NOT 

OVER-WRITE GREEN). 

You may find it helpful to use Excel's "freeze panes" or "split panes" 

feature when completing your permit information so you can see 

emission units and pollutants entered to the left. 

Pollutant Code

REVISED 

Pollutant Code Pollutant_Code_Desc

PM10-FIL Primary PM10, Filterable Portion Only

CO Carbon Monoxide

NH3 Ammonia

NOX Nitrogen Oxides

PM10-FIL Primary PM10, Filterable Portion Only

PM10-PRI Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles)

PM25-FIL Primary PM2.5, Filterable Portion Only

PM25-PRI Primary PM2.5 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles)

PM-CON Primary PM Condensible Portion Only (All Less Than 1 Micron)

SO2 Sulfur Dioxide

VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

226 Nickel & Compounds

7439921 Lead

CO Carbon Monoxide

NH3 Ammonia

NOX Nitrogen Oxides

PM10-FIL Primary PM10, Filterable Portion Only

PM10-PRI Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles)

PM25-FIL Primary PM2.5, Filterable Portion Only

PM25-PRI Primary PM2.5 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles)

PM-CON Primary PM Condensible Portion Only (All Less Than 1 Micron)

SO2 Sulfur Dioxide

VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

50000 Formaldehyde

7439976 Mercury

7440439 Cadmium

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 21 of 101
Pulp and Paper sector permit data. Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this permit information table to the right of the orange column. 

Instruction:

Optional column useful for crosschecking permit data and when 

comparing permit to NEI.

Optional. Complete this column to 

avoid restating Federal permit limits in 

the columns to the right.

Enter numeric value of permit 

limit coinciding with the 

pollutant listed in the 

POLLUTANT_DESCRIPTION 

column in the NEI data to the 

left of the orange line. 

See Table 2 of survey 

overview document for permit 

limit units of interest. Enter units for permit limit 

Supply averaging time for 

permit limit if an averaging 

time is specified in the permit. 

Averaging times are 

commonly specified for 

pollutants measured with 

continuous monitors (e.g., 3-

hour block average, daily 

average, etc). 

Leave blank if no averaging 

time is specified in your 

permit.

Survey overview reference:

Field:

Identifier used in permit (e.g., 

emission unit ID, stack ID, etc) - 

optional

If the permit limit is identical to the 

Federal NESHAP or NSPS limit, you 

may enter the NESHAP/NSPS 

subpart here rather than restating 

the Federal limit in the columns to 

the right Numeric permit limit 1

Units for permit limit 1 

(including any applicable %O2 

or %CO2 correction factors)

Averaging time for permit 

limit 1 (if applicable)

Example PM entry: BLR01 0.02 gr/dscf @ 8% O2

Pull down menu text located below this line Subpart S (P&P NESHAP) gr/dscf @ 8% O2 3-hour

Subpart MM (P&P combustion source NESHAP) gr/dscf @ 10% O2 12-hour

Subpart BB (Kraft NSPS) lb/ton BLS daily

Subpart Db (Boiler NSPS) ppmdv @ 8% O2 test

Subpart Dc (Small Boiler NSPS) ppmdv @ 10% O2 allow others

allow others lb/ton BLS (as H2S)

lb/MMBtu 

ppmdv

% reduction

% opacity

allow others

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 22 of 101
Enter numeric value of permit 

limit coinciding with the 

pollutant listed in the 

POLLUTANT_DESCRIPTION 

column in the NEI data to the 

left of the orange line. 

See Table 2 of survey 

overview document for permit 

limit units of interest. Enter units for permit limit 

Supply averaging time for 

permit limit if an averaging time 

is specified in the permit. 

Averaging times are commonly 

specified for pollutants 

measured with continuous 

monitors (e.g., 3-hour block 

average, daily average, etc). 

Leave blank if no averaging 

time is specified in your permit.

Enter numeric value of permit 

limit coinciding with the pollutant 

listed in the 

POLLUTANT_DESCRIPTION 

column in the NEI data to the left 

of the orange line. 

See Table 2 of survey overview 

document for permit limit units of 

interest. Enter units for permit limit 

Supply averaging time for permit limit if an averaging time is specified in the permit. 

Averaging times are commonly specified for pollutants measured with continuous 

monitors (e.g., 3-hour block average, daily average, etc). 

Leave blank if no averaging time is specified in your permit.

Numeric permit limit 2

Units for permit limit 2 

(including any applicable 

%O2 or %CO2 correction 

factors)

Averaging time for permit 

limit 2 (if applicable) Numeric permit limit 3

Units for permit limit 3 

(including any applicable 

%O2 or %CO2 correction 

factors) Averaging time for permit limit 3 (if applicable)

5 % opacity 20 % opacity

Do not exceed 20% for more than three 6-min averages in a 3-hour period 

determined by Method 9

3-hour 3-hour

12-hour 12-hour

daily daily

test test

allow others allow others

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 23 of 101
Enter numeric value of permit 

limit coinciding with the pollutant 

listed in the 

POLLUTANT_DESCRIPTION 

column in the NEI data to the left 

of the orange line. 

See Table 2 of survey overview 

document for permit limit units of 

interest. Enter units for permit limit 

Supply averaging time for 

permit limit if an averaging 

time is specified in the permit. 

Averaging times are 

commonly specified for 

pollutants measured with 

continuous monitors (e.g., 3-

hour block average, daily 

average, etc). 

Leave blank if no averaging 

time is specified in your 

permit.

Enter numeric value of permit limit 

coinciding with the pollutant listed 

in the 

POLLUTANT_DESCRIPTION 

column in the NEI data to the left of 

the orange line. 

See Table 2 of survey overview 

document for permit limit units of 

interest. Enter units for permit limit 

Supply averaging time for permit limit if 

an averaging time is specified in the 

permit. Averaging times are commonly 

specified for pollutants measured with 

continuous monitors (e.g., 3-hour block 

average, daily average, etc). 

Leave blank if no averaging time is 

specified in your permit.

Numeric permit limit 4

Units for permit limit 4 

(including any applicable 

%O2 or %CO2 correction 

factors)

Averaging time for permit 

limit 4 (if applicable) Numeric permit limit 5

Units for permit limit 5 

(including any applicable %O2 

or %CO2 correction factors)

Averaging time for permit limit 5 (if 

applicable)

3-hour 3-hour

12-hour 12-hour

daily daily

test test

allow others allow others

Inventory EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 24 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? Yes/No

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Review Draft

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table. You may find it helpful to use Excel's "freeze panes" or "split" features when viewing this spreadsheet. 

Instruction:

Provide for all 

entries. This should 

match NEI Site ID 

used in other tabs.

Provide for all entries. Line IDs should match those 

used in other tabs. Enter Pulping line ID for pulp mill 

equipment, Bleaching line ID for bleach plant 

equipment, or Emission Unit ID of paper machine with 

which paper mill equipment are affiliated. If 

equipment is shared between 2 lines (e.g., chemical 

recovery equipment serving 2 pulping lines) then 

indicate both Line IDs separated by an underscore "_." 

See subpart S definitions of "pulping line" and 

"bleaching line" if needed.

Provide for all entries. Use the Emission Unit ID in the Inventory tab if the individual 

emission unit was listed there. If emission units were aggregated by collection system 

in the inventory tab, then you would list each emission unit separately with a new 

Emission Unit ID in this tab. Collection systems (identified with the Collection system 

ID), boilers/combustion units, strippers, and thermal oxidizers must also be included in 

this column so air pollution controls and equipment details can be specified separately 

for these equipment.

Note that in some cases the Emission Unit ID will be the same as a Collection system 

ID or APCD_ID. 

Leave columns that do not apply for a given 

emission unit blank.

Specify the collection system if applicable. 

(Examples of collection systems include closed 

vent systems, LVHC, and HVLC systems.)

Enter the decimal value for control capture 

efficiency, if available (e.g., 0.90 = 90% 

capture).

Blank entries for emission units with control 

devices will be considered as having 100% 

capture.

Enter the following codes for emission units 

that are not emitted through a conveyance 

such as a collection system or stack: NV = 

not vented; BLDG = vented into a building; 

FUGITIVE = fugitive emission source

Survey overview reference: Equipment identification

Field: NEI Site ID

Line ID (Pulping line ID, Bleaching line ID, or paper 

machine Emission Unit ID) Emission Unit ID

Collection system ID (for collection systems 

that collect gases from multiple process units 

prior to air pollution control). Control Capture Efficiency (%)

Configuration if not emitted through a 

conveyance

Example entry: 99999 Kraft1 DIG-1 LVHC-1

99999 Kraft1 DIG-2 LVHC-1

99999 Kraft1 STRIPPER

LVHC-1

99999 Kraft1 TO

99999 Kraft1 LK1

99999 Kraft1_TMP1 Boiler EU55

99999 Kraft1 EVAP LVHC-1

99999 Kraft1 GENERIC UNIT 0.85

NV

BLDG

FUGITIVE

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 25 of 101
Use this column for notes or 

if helpful to relate equipment 

and process lines to permit or 

other information

Write in a description using the 

common equipment types listed in 

Attachment 1 of the survey overview 

document, and/or refer to 

EMISSION_UNIT_DESCRIPTION or 

"Emission Process Group" columns in 

the Inventory tab.

Enter "UK" if unknown; or 

"pre-1990" if more than 20 

years old and the install date 

is unknown. if the emission 

unit was substantially 

upgraded, enter the year of 

the upgrade as XXXXupgrade.

Enter manufacturer ONLY for chemical 

recovery combustion sources (recovery 

furnaces, black liquor oxidizers, chemical 

recovery combustion units, lime kilns, black 

liquor oxidizers) and boilers. Enter "UK" for 

unknown. Enter "shop-built" for equipment 

designed by the mill.

Enter 2009 operating 

hr/yr

Enter any combustion control 

measures installed/employed to reduce 

air pollution from combustion sources 

(e.g., boilers, recovery furnaces, lime 

kilns) Select yes/no

Enter percent 

reduction (if 

known) and 

specify if 

measured or 

design.

Enter percent 

reduction (if 

known) and 

specify if 

measured or 

design.

Enter percent 

reduction (if 

known) and 

specify if 

measured or 

design.

Describe any specific process control or 

pollution prevention measures used to reduce 

emissions from the Emission Unit ID (other 

then the use of combustion controls or an air 

pollution control device). Use this column to 

describe control measures that are not 

otherwise reflected elsewhere in this survey 

response spreadsheet.

Combustion controls Process controls or pollution prevention

Process notes (optional) Emission unit description

Year emission unit 

installed Emission unit manufacturer

Emission unit 

operating hr/yr Combustion controls

Were these combustion 

controls added within the 

last 10 years?

Combustion 

control NOx 

%red

Combustion 

control SO2 

%red

Combustion 

control 

CO%red

Process controls or pollution prevention 

measures

digester pre-1990 8400

digester pre-1990 8430

steam stripper system 2000 8430

LVHC collection system 2000-upgrade 8370

thermal oxidizer (backup) 2000 390

lime kiln 1983 Chanderpur Works 8400

use fresh mill water for lime mud washing to 

reduce TRS from the lime kiln

boiler 1985 Wellons 8700 overfire air No 20%-design

evaporator UK 8430

generic example row UK 8430

UK UK low NOx burners Y/N

pre-1990 shop-built quarternary air

other {specify}

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 26 of 101
Primary method of control. Use these "APCD" columns to 

describe the primary method of control. (Backup controls are 

to be entered in the next series of columns to the right). 

Enter controls in sequence in which they are used to control 

each emission unit.

Enter controls for collection systems only in the row where the 

collection system ID appears in the Emission Unit ID column.

Enter ID code 

for first APCD 

(to be used 

throughout the 

survey 

spreadsheets)

Enter 2nd control device if multiple 

controls used.

If process equipment such as a boiler or 

lime kiln) is used to control emissions, 

include any control devices used on the 

process equipment. 

Enter ID code 

for 2nd APCD 

(to be used 

throughout the 

survey 

spreadsheets)

Enter 3rd control device if multiple 

controls used.

If process equipment such as a 

boiler or lime kiln) is used to control 

emissions, include any control 

devices used on the process 

equipment. 

Enter ID code 

for 3rd APCD 

(to be used 

throughout 

the survey 

spreadsheets

)

Enter 4th control device if multiple 

controls used.

If process equipment such as a boiler 

or lime kiln) is used to control 

emissions, include any control devices 

used on the process equipment. 

Enter ID code 

for 4th APCD 

(to be used 

throughout 

the survey 

spreadsheets

)

Air pollution controls

APCD1 type APCD1_ID APCD2 type APCD2_ID APCD3 type APCD3_ID APCD4 type APCD4_ID

Boiler EU55 Boiler EU55 WESP WESP 1

Lime kiln 1 LK1 Scrubber SCBR2

Scrubber SCBR6

Scrubber SCBR2

WESP WESP 1

Uncontrolled

Recovery furnace ESP (dry bottom) same pull-down as APCD1 same pull-down as APCD1 same pull-down as APCD1

Recovery furnace ESP (wet bottom)

ESP (dry)

Wet ESP (WESP)

Scrubber - venturi

Scrubber - quench

Scrubber - packed bed

Scrubber

Absorber

Mist eliminator

Thermal oxidizer/incinerator

Regenerative thermal oxidizer

Multicyclone

Cyclone (excluding product recovery cyclones)

Fabric filter (baghouse)

Condenser

Gravel bed

Dry sorbent injection

Carbon adsorber

Selective noncatalytic reduction

Selective catalytic reduction

Boiler (specify Emission Unit ID)

Lime kiln (specify Emission Unit ID)

Recovery furnace (specify Emission Unit ID)

Other - specify type (and Emission Unit ID if applicable)

Uncontrolled

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 27 of 101
Complete for emission units (as 

shown in the Emission Unit ID 

column) with backup controls 

used only during certain times. 

(Primary controls for the collection 

system were identified in the 

APCD columns to the left). Specify conditions Specify

Backup controls

Back-up method of control 

(specify APCD_ID or Emission 

Unit ID)

Conditions when backup 

control is used

Approximate hr/yr when backup 

control is used to control 

emissions from the Emission 

Unit ID

TO When Boiler EU55 is not operating 330

TO When LK1 is not operating 390

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 28 of 101
Select yes/no. 

[Consider how the emission unit is permitted 

when specifying if it is subject to NSPS BB. For 

example, a boiler or thermal oxidizer controlling 

BB emission units is not necessarily an emission 

unit subject to BB. If your permit indicates the 

unit is subject to BB then indicate "yes" in the 

column below.]

Provide year. If not known, 

enter approximation year 

(e.g., "pre-1990") Select from menu.

Select from menu for recovery 

furnaces subject to subpart BB 

(straignt or cross). 

Indicate NSPS BB TRS compliance option used to demonstrate NSPS 

compliance with primary method of control.

[Note: You may enter the compliance option for each emission unit or 

for the relevant collection system if listed separately.] 

Indicate NSPS subpart BB TRS compliance option used to 

demonstrate compliance using backup method of control for the 

emission unit (if a backup method of control is used).

[Note: Leave blank if no backup control is specified in columns AB-AD 

to the left for this emission unit.]

Subpart BB NSPS applicability

Is emission unit subject to NSPS BB?

If yes, year became 

subject to BB (XXXX)

Reason subject 

to BB

Type of recovery furnace subject to 

subpart BB

Specify TRS compliance option used to demonstrate NSPS 

subpart BB compliance (if applicable)

Specify TRS compliance option used for backup method of 

control (if applicable)

yes pre-1990 new

yes pre-1990 new

no

yes pre-1990

collects 

emissions from 

BB emisison units combust gases in lime kiln or recovery furnace subject to subpart BB 5 ppmdv @ 10% O2 (combustion control)

no

yes 1983 new 8 ppmdv @ 10% O2 (lime kilns)

no

yes pre-1990 new

no

Y/N new straight 5 ppmdv @ 10% O2 (combustion control) 5 ppmdv @ 10% O2 (combustion control)

modified cross 5 ppmdv, uncorrected for O2 (control other than combustion) 5 ppmdv, uncorrected for O2 (control other than combustion)

reconstructed combust gases in lime kiln or recovery furnace subject to subpart BB combust gases in lime kiln or recovery furnace subject to subpart BB

modified or 

reconstructed (not 

sure) combust gases at 1200oF for at least 0.5 sec combust gases at 1200oF for at least 0.5 sec 

collects 

emissions from 

BB emisison units incinerating brown stock washer gases is not feasible incinerating brown stock washer gases is not feasible

uncontrolled digester gases contain <0.01 lb TRS/ton ADP uncontrolled digester gases contain <0.01 lb TRS/ton ADP

8 ppmdv @ 10% O2 (lime kilns) 8 ppmdv @ 10% O2 (lime kilns)

0.033 lb/ton BLS as H2S (SDTs) 0.033 lb/ton BLS as H2S (SDTs)

5 ppmdv @ 8% O2 (striaght recovery furnace) 5 ppmdv @ 8% O2 (striaght recovery furnace)

25 ppmdv @ 8% O2 (cross recovery furnace) 25 ppmdv @ 8% O2 (cross recovery furnace)

Meet permit limit more stringent than NSPS Meet permit limit more stringent than NSPS

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 29 of 101
Select yes/no.

[Consider how the emission unit is permitted when specifying if it 

is subject to subpart S. For example, a boiler or TO controlling 

subpart S emission units is not necessarily an emission unit 

subject to subpart S. If your permit indicates the unit is subject to 

subpart S then indicate "yes" in the column below.]

Indicate compliance option met using primary 

method of control for the emission unit.

If the clean condensate alternative (CCA) is used, 

be sure to complete the CCA tab.

Indicate compliance option met using backup 

method of control for the emission unit (if a backup 

method of control is used).

If the CCA is used, be sure to complete the CCA tab.

See pull down menu for potential reasons some vent gas 

streams may not be covered under subpart S. Some rule 

exceptions are listed in the menu. You may write in other 

reasons. Leave blank for emission units emission units outside 

of the subpart S source category (e.g., boilers, lime kilns, 

recovery furnaces, etc)

Subpart S NESHAP applicability

Is emission unit subject to NESHAP subpart S?

Subpart S compliance option used (for primary 

method of control)

Subpart S compliance option used (for backup 

method of control, if applicable) Provide reason if not controlled to meet subpart S

yes

yes

yes

Use a boiler, LK, or RF in which the HAP gas 

stream in introduced with the primary fuel into the 

flame zone

Reduce total HAP concentration at the outlet of 

thermal oxidizer to <20 ppmv @ 10% O2 (dry basis)

yes

Use a boiler, LK, or RF in which the HAP gas 

stream in introduced with the primary fuel into the 

flame zone

Reduce total HAP concentration at the outlet of 

thermal oxidizer to <20 ppmv @ 10% O2 (dry basis)

no

no

no

yes

no

Y/N Reduce total HAP emissions by 98 wt% Reduce total HAP emissions by 98 wt%

Systems of this type at existing sources are not subject to 

subpart S

Reduce total HAP concentration at the outlet of 

thermal oxidizer to <20 ppmv @ 10% O2 (dry basis)

Reduce total HAP concentration at the outlet of 

thermal oxidizer to <20 ppmv @ 10% O2 (dry basis)

The system does not match the definitions for controlled 

systems in subpart S. Provide reason (e.g., due to specific 

location of the system in the process line).

Reduce total HAP emissions using a thermal 

oxidizer operating >1600F and >.75 secs residence 

time

Reduce total HAP emissions using a thermal oxidizer 

operating >1600F and >.75 secs residence time

Exception 63.443(a)(ii)(A): knotter system with HAP emissions 

<0.1 lb/ton ODP

Use a boiler, LK, or RF in which the HAP gas 

stream in introduced with the primary fuel into the 

flame zone

Use a boiler, LK, or RF in which the HAP gas stream 

in introduced with the primary fuel into the flame 

zone

Exception 63.443(a)(ii)(B): screen system with <0.2 lb/ton 

ODP, 

Use a boiler or RF with a heat input capacity >150 

MMBtu/hr (44 MW) in which the HAP gas stream is 

introduced with the combustion air

Use a boiler or RF with a heat input capacity >150 

MMBtu/hr (44 MW) in which the HAP gas stream is 

introduced with the combustion air

Exception 63.443(a)(ii)(C): knotter and screen system with 

combined emissions <0.3 lb/ton ODP

Clean condensate alternative (§63.447) for kraft 

HVLC systems.

Clean condensate alternative (§63.447) for kraft 

HVLC systems.

Exception 63.443(a)(iv)(A): decker uses only fresh water or 

paper machine white water

0.89 lb/ton ODP (for Ca- or Na-based sulfite 

pulping) 0.89 lb/ton ODP (for Ca- or Na-based sulfite pulping) 

Exception 63.443(a)(iv)(B): decker uses process water with < 

400 ppmw 

92% reduction by weight (for Ca- or Na-based 

sulfite pulping) 

92% reduction by weight (for Ca- or Na-based sulfite 

pulping) Mill received equivalency by permit approval

2.2 lb/ton ODP (for Mg-based or NH3-based sulfite 

pulping)

2.2 lb/ton ODP (for Mg-based or NH3-based sulfite 

pulping) Mill undertook innovations project

87% reduction by weight (for Mg-based or NH3-

based sulfite pulping)

87% reduction by weight (for Mg-based or NH3-

based sulfite pulping) Emissions from this unit were offset using CCA

Other - specify

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 30 of 101
Select yes/no

[Consider how the emission unit is permitted when 

specifying if it is subject to subpart MM. For 

example, an LVHC stream controlled by a lime kiln is 

not necessarily a subpart MM emission unit. If your 

permit indicates the unit is subject to MM then 

indicate "yes" in the column below.]

Provide description for emission units 

subject to subpart MM. If no physical 

equipment changes or operational 

changes were required to achieve subpart 

MM compliance, then enter "no changes 

required."

If yes, submit PM 

bubble calculations 

per instructions.

Complete for each 

digester.

Select from menu

Enter 

numeric 

value

Select from menu. In the menu, "HW/SW

swing" refers to digesters that process 

hardwood (HW) some of the time and softwood 

(SW) at other times. "HW and SW" refers to 

digesters that process a mixture of hardwood 

and softwood. You may also select "Nonwood."

Complete for each 

pulp washer.

Enter numeric value

Select from 

menu Enter numeric value

Write in the source of the wash 

water for the final stage of the 

vacuum drum washer (if 

vacuum drum washer used) 

If you have vacuum drum 

washers, enter the final washing 

stage shower water methanol 

concentration in millograms per 

liter, if known

Subpart MM NESHAP applicability Digesters Pulp washers

Is emission unit subject to NESHAP MM?

Describe any physical or operational 

changes made to the emisison unit in 

order to achieve subpart MM 

compliance

Is this emission 

unit involved in a 

subpart MM PM 

bubble 

calculation? 

Batch or 

continuous

Digester 

capacity, 

ADTP/d Wood type (HW, SW, HW/SW swing)

Washer capacity, 

ADTP/d Washer type

If the washing line 

has rotary drum 

vacuum washers, how 

many washing stages 

are there?

Source of vacuum drum 

washer final stage shower 

water

Vacuum drum washer final 

stage shower water methanol 

concentration, mg/l

no Continuous 480 SW

no Continuous 520 HW/SW swing

no

no

no

yes no changes required no

no

no

no 1000 vacuum drum 3

stripped digester and 

evaporator condensates

Y/N Y/N Batch HW vacuum drum

Continuous SW diffusion

HW/SW swing pressure

HW and SW belt

Non-wood

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 31 of 101
Complete for each, knotter, screen, 

and decker.

Enter numeric value

Enter type of shower water used in 

decker (if applicable)

Complete for 

each evaporator 

system

Enter numeric 

value

Enter Emission Unit ID(s) for 

pulp washers supplying weak 

liquor

Enter numeric 

value Select from menu

Complete for oxygen 

delignification systems.

Enter numeric value

Enter Emission Unit 

ID(s) for pulp washers 

supplying the brownstock

Enter the numeric value for 

methanol concentration, if 

known

Knotters, screens, and deckers Evaporators Oxygen delignification

Knotter, screen, or decker 

capacity, ADTP/d

Type of shower water used in 

decker

Evaporator 

capacity, 

ADTP/d

Which pulp washer(s) are 

the source(s) of weak liquor 

for the evaporator set?

How many 

evaporator 

effects are 

there?

Does last effect serve 

as DCE or NDCE? 

(specify which)

Design capacity, 

ADTP/d (inlet stock)

From which washer 

lines is the brownstock 

coming from?

Methanol concentration in 

post-O2 delignification 

washer shower water, mg/l

1000 WASHER 6 No

300 1100 WASHER 436

contaminated condensates No

clean condensates Yes - DCE

white water Yes - NDCE

other (specify)

NA

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 32 of 101
Complete for steam 

strippers and air strippers 

used to remove 

compounds from 

condensates, wastewater, 

or other process liquids.

Select air/steam Select yes/no

Enter description of the condensate streams (e.g., 

evaporator condensates, digester condensates, turpentine 

recovery system condensates, LVHC system condensates, 

HVLC system condensates), wastewater streams, or othe 

process liquid streams that are stripped

Enter numeric value for 

total liquid flow to the 

stripper

Enter numeric 

value Enter numeric value

Enter numeric 

value Select from menu or write in

Enter the methanol removal efficiency 

if it has been measured (e.g., enter 92 

for 92%).

If measured efficiency is not available, 

enter the design efficiency (e.g., enter 

"95-D" to reflect a design methanol 

removal efficiency of 95%)

Enter the total TRS removal 

efficiency if it has been measured 

(e.g., enter 92 for 92%).

If measured efficiency is not 

available, enter the design 

efficiency (e.g., enter "95-D" to 

reflect a design methanol removal 

efficiency of 95%)

Strippers

Type of stripper

Is the stripper 

integrated with 

the multiple 

effect 

evaporator 

system? List all liquid streams sent to the stripper

Liquid flow to the 

stripper, gpm

Steam application 

rate, lb/gal

Liquid column 

feed temperature, 

F

For air stripper, 

air flow rate, 

cfm/gpm Primary reason for installation of the stripper Methanol removal efficiency, % TRS removal efficiency, %

steam no

DIG-1 and DIG-2 condensates, EVAP condensates 

(effects 1-3), LVHC-1 condensates, Turpentine decanter 

underflow 315 1.5 130

water conservation; and subpart S kraft pulping 

condensate standards 92 94

steam Y/N TRS control

air BOD reduction

water conservation

subpart S kraft pulping condensate standards

nonchlorinated organic HAP control

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 33 of 101
Complete the pulp and liquor 

storage questions for pulp 

storage tanks (e.g., high 

density storage), stock chests, 

strong and weak liquor storage 

tanks. 

Select from menu or specify

Do not include tanks that are defined as part of the 

bleaching, decker, evaporator, pulp washing, O2 

delignification, steam stripper, process wastewater 

treatment, or turpentine recovery systems under 

Subpart S. Do not include acid condensate storage 

tanks.

Enter numeric value Enter numeric value

Select from menu. If tank emissions 

are routed to a collection system and 

control device or to a process, then the 

collection system, APCD, or process 

Emission Unit ID should be relfected in 

the appropriate columns to the left of 

this worksheet. Select from menu

Complete for liquor 

storage ponds

Select from menu or 

write in Enter numeric value Enter numeric value Enter numeric value

Pulp storage and Liquor storage Liquor storage ponds

Tank contents Tank capacity, gal

Annual throughput, 

gal/yr Tank control technique If floating roof is used, type of seal Pond contents Pond surface area, ft2 Pond capacity, gal

Annual pond 

throughput, gal/yr

strong black liquor 14365 1,304,230 FR =fixed roof Not applicable weak black liquor 26400 158400 2,300,000

weak black liquor Open tank Not applicable weak black liquor

strong black liquor FR =fixed roof Mechanical shoe primary seal (MS1) strong black liquor

high density pulp EFR = external floating roof MS1 with shoe mounted secondary (MESA) white liquor

white liquor IFR = internal floating roof MS1 with rim mounted secondary (MESA) green liquor

green liquor Collection system and control device liquid mounted primary seal (LM1)

Emissions routed to process (enter 

Emission Unit ID) LM1 with rim mounted secondary (LM2)

vapor mounted primary seal (VM1)

M1 with rim mounted secondary (VM2)

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 34 of 101
Enter numeric value for lime kiln 

throughput in tons CaO/yr.

Enter (repeat) value for each 

causticizing emission unit listed 

in this tab, except for slakers. Enter numeric value Complete this question for lime mud washers and lime mud pre-coat filters.Select the source(s) of makeup water added to the mud washer or precoat filter from the list. You may write in more than one source. Untreated process condensates refers to process condensates that have received no treatment (such as steam 

Select yes/no.

Answer this question with respect to each 

causticizing Emission Unit ID specified in 

column D.

Enter description if answer to previous question 

was "yes."

Emission reductions achieved may apply to the 

Emission Unit ID specified (for which the process 

change was made) or to down stream emission 

units in the causticizing loop. Indicate the 

Emission Unit ID for any down stream emission 

units affected.

If black liquor gasification is 

used, provide a diagram and 

description of the system 

including any combustion 

controls or add-on controls 

used to reduce air pollutants. 

Complete for each black 

liquor oxidation (BLO) 

system. 

Select from 

menu Select from menu

Enter 

number

Enter 

numeric 

value

Enter 

numeric 

value (e.g., 

enter "45" for 

45%)

Causticizing equipment Black liquor gasification Black liquor oxidation systems

Causticizing area throughput 

(use lime kiln tons CaO/yr) Slaker capacity, tph Source(s) of makeup water added to mud washer or precoat filter

Has the mill taken steps within the last 

10 years to control makeup water quality 

for the causticizing emission unit such 

that air emissions from any equipment 

would be reduced?

If yes, please describe these changes and the 

reduction in emissions achieved

Black liquor gasifier 

capacity (million ton 

BLS/yr)

Emission Unit ID(s) of 

recovery furnace(s) 

downstream of BLO 

Type of liquor 

oxidized BLO type

No. of air 

oxidation 

stages

Liquor 

flow rate, 

gpm

Liquor 

solids 

content, %

3942000 450

treated wastewater, and partially treated 

wastewater - CLARIFIER1 water yes

Replaced half of the lime mud wash water volume 

(from CLARIFIER1) with treated wastewater from 

STRIPPER in order to reduce methanol emissions 

from the lime mud washer and LK1. 1.9 RF1 strong air 1 364 49

Untreated process condensates from {specify 

process - e.g., evaporator, blow heat recovery} yes strong air

surface water no weak molecular oxygen

fresh water

process water {specify source}

treated wastewater 

partially treated wastewater {specify last 

wastewater treatment unit water passed through} 

mixture {specify sources}

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 35 of 101
Complete for each 

recovery furnace at 

kraft, soda, sulfite, 

and co-located 

kraft/semi-chemical 

pulp mills. 

Select from menu

If you operate an NDCE recovery furnace, indicate if it was 

previously a DCE recovery furnace that underwent a DCE 

furnace conversion (e.g., a low odor conversion). 

Select yes/no

Leave blank if not applicable.

Enter year (e.g., 2000) 

when DCE furnace 

was converted to an 

NDCE furnace (if 

applicable).

Leave blank if not 

applicable.

Select from menu 

or write in

Enter numeric 

value for black 

liquor solids 

(BLS) or red 

liquor solids 

(RLS) for sulfite

Enter numeric 

value (e.g., enter 

"45" for 45%)

Enter % sulfur, 

chloride, or 

nitrogen if 

known.

Input site-specific 

higher heating value 

(HHV) of the pulping 

liquor, if measured.

Complete the recovery furnace 

ESP questions if applicable. If 

not applicable leave blank. 

Indicate the type of liquor used 

in the wet bottom ESP

The particulate matter (PM) return 

system returns PM collected in the 

ESP to the process. 

Select wet or dry from menu Select from menu

Enter year (e.g., 2000) if 

an ESP was converted.

Recovery furnaces Recovery furnace ESPs

Recovery furnace 

type

Was NDCE formerly a DCE (i.e., has the unit undergone 

a low odor conversion)?

DCE furnace 

conversion year 

(XXXX), if applicable Type of liquor

Spent liquor 

solids feed rate, 

million lb BLS/yr 

(or million lb 

RLS/yr for 

sulfite)

Liquor solids % 

by weight

Liquor sulfur 

% by weight

Liquor chloride 

% by weight

Liquor nitrogen 

% by weight

Liquor HHV Btu/lb 

dry solids

Oxidized or unoxidized black 

liquor (for wet bottom 

recovery furnace ESPs)

Wet or dry PM return system (for 

recovery furnace ESPs)

For wet PM return 

system, specify liquid

Indicate year (XXXX) 

recovery furnace ESP 

was converted from a 

wet bottom/wet PM 

return system to a dry 

bottom/dry PM return 

system, if applicable

DCE no black 1.9 65 4.3 0.71 5940 Oxidized black liquor wet Oxidized black liquor

DCE yes black Oxidized black liquor wet Oxidized black liquor

NDCE no red Unoxidized black liquor dry Unoxidized black liquor

mixture of kraft black liquor and semi hem green liquor NA-wet bottom ESP not used

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 36 of 101
Complete for each 

chemical recovery 

combustion unit at a 

stand-alone semichemical pulp mill. 

Select from menu

Select from 

menu Select from menu

Select from menu 

or write in Enter numeric value

Input site-specific higher 

heating value (HHV) of 

the pulping liquor, if 

measured.

Enter numeric 

value

Complete for each kraft, 

soda, sulfite, and semichemical smelt (or ash) 

dissolving tank. 

Select 

from 

menu Enter numeric value

Select from menu or write in. Enter "SDT 

scrubber water" if the SDT scrubber water 

drains into the SDT (as if often the case). See 

description of the other menu choices in the 

survey overview document instructions for the 

Controls tab. 

Enter numeric value in millograms 

per liter. 

Enter numeric value in 

millograms per liter. 

Enter NA if TRS emissions 

would not be expected 

(e.g., for nonsulfur 

semichemical pulp mills) 

Semi-chemical combustion units Smelt/ash dissolving tanks

Type of combustor

Liquor 

evaporation 

equipment Type of DCE Type of liquor

Spent liquor solids feed 

rate, million lb/yr

Liquor HHV Btu/lb dry 

solids

Combustion unit 

hottest 

temperature, F

EMISISON_UNIT_ID of 

RF or combustion unit 

supplying SDT Type

Smelt or ash production 

rate, lb/day Type and source of water used in tank

Methanol concentration of water 

used to dissolve smelt/ash in tank 

(if known), mg/l

TRS concentration of 

water used to dissolve 

smelt/ash in tank (if 

known), mg/l

fluidized bed reactor DCE Venturi scrubber black 75 5420 1400 RF1 smelt 690000 process water {weak wash} 45

fluidized bed reactor Concentrator Cyclone black smelt SDT scrubber water

recovery furnace DCE Cascade ash surface water

smelter None Venturi scrubber fresh water

rotary liquor kiln process water {specify source}

pyrolysis reactor treated wastewater 

partially treated wastewater {specify last 

wastewater treatment unit water passed 

through} 

mixture {specify sources}

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 37 of 101
Complete Table 8 

for each kraft or 

soda lime kiln. 

Select from menu Enter numeric value

Enter numeric 

value (i.e., "30" = 

30%)

Enter numeric 

value for kiln hot 

end operating 

temperature (F)

Enter numeric 

value for kiln cold 

end operating 

temperature (F) Select from menu Select yes/no Select from menu

Complete for boiles, 

thermal oxidizers, or 

incinerators.

Enter numeric value 

in million Btu per 

hour (MMBtu/hr)

Complete for lime kilns, recovery furnaces, chemical 

recovery combustion units, boilers, thermal oxidizers, etc 

that are used to incinerate NCG or SOG. 

List all sources of NCG or SOG, identified by their 

Collection System IDs or Emission Unit IDs separated by 

commas, for which the emission unit serves as primary 

control (e.g., LVHC1, SOG, TALLOIL, ...)

List all sources of NCG or SOG, 

identified by their Collection 

System IDs or Emission Unit IDs 

separated by commas, for which 

the emission unit serves as backup 

control (e.g., LVHC2, HVLC1 ...)

Lime kilns (including rotary lime kilns and fluidized bed calciners)

Boilers and thermal 

oxidixers/incinerator

s Equipment incinerating NCG or SOG

Type of kiln Lime production rate, ton/d

Moisture 

content of lime 

mud, %

Kiln hot end 

temperature (F)

Kiln cold end 

temperature (F) NCG introduction method

Are SOG introduced 

with NCG? If no, SOG introduction method

Design heat input 

capacity, MMBtu/hr

NCG/SOG for which the emission unit provides 

primary control

NCG/SOG for which the 

emission unit provides backup 

control

20 STRIPPER, LVHC-1

rotary 200 29 2000 450 with primary fuel no NA - SOG are not burned in lime kiln LVHC-1

435 STRIPPER

rotary with primary fuel Y/N with primary fuel

fluidized bed with primary combustion air with primary combustion air

dedicated nozzle located near burner dedicated nozzle located near burner

NA - SOG are not burned in lime kiln

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 38 of 101
Complete for fuel-fired equipment such 

as boilers, lime kilns, thermal oxidizers, 

and direct-fired dryers. Enter the types of 

primary fuels fired (excluding black 

liquor, red liquor, SOG, or other NCGs). 

Enter primary fuel type

Enter numeric value for 

amount of fuel used in 

2009. Use the list of 

preferred units in the 

next column.

Enter units of measure for fuel usage amount:

 Use gal/yr for liquid fuels (#2 distillate fuel oil, #6 residual fuel oil, turpentine, 

tall oil).

 Use tons/yr for solid fuels such as bituminous/subbitumnius/lignite coal, tirederived fuel, or petroleum coke.

 Use tons/yr (as fired) for solid fuels such as bark, hog fuel, and sludge. 

 Use MMscf/yr for gaseous fuels. 

Enter the numeric higher heating value 

(HHV) for non-fossil fuels corresponding 

to the suggested units in next column.

Optional. EPA can assume default 

HHVs for fossil fuels, or you may opt to 

enter the HHV for your fossil fuel (e.g., if 

the fuel is relatively uncommon)

Specify units corresponding to 

the HHV as fired. Use 

Btu/gal for liquid fuels, 

MMBtu/ton for solid fuels, and 

Btu/MMscf for gaseous fuels.

Specify average 

moisture content 

as fired for 

biomass fuels only 

(decimal percent 

by weight, i.e., 

enter "0.2" for 20%) 

Primary fuels for fuel-fired equipment (except black or red liquor)

Primary fuel type Primary fuel amount Primary fuel amount units

Average HHV of non-fossil primary 

fuels Primary fuel HHV units

Moisture content 

for biomass fuel 

(decimal % by 

weight)

natural gas 12297.6 MMscf/yr 1020000000 Btu/MMscf

hog fuel 416700 tons/yr 12.6 MMBtu/ton 23

natural gas gal/yr Btu/gal

#2 distillate oil tons/yr MMBtu/ton

#6 residual oil tons/yr (as fired) Btu/MMscf

bark MMscf/yr

hog fuel

bituminous coal

subbitumnius coal

lignite coal

allow others

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 39 of 101
Hidden columns:

Complete for fuel-fired equipment such as boilers, recovery 

furnaces, chemical recovery combustion units, lime kilns, 

thermal oxidizers, and direct-fired dryers. Enter the types of 

supplemental or other fuels fired (excluding SOG or other 

NCGs). 

Include secondary and additional fuels used routinely for 

multi-fuel fired equipment in these columns.

Enter numeric value for 

amount of fuel used in 

2009. Use the list of 

preferred units in the next 

column.

Enter units of measure for fuel usage amount:

 Use gal/yr for liquid fuels (#2 distillate fuel oil, #6 residual fuel oil, turpentine, 

tall oil).

 Use tons/yr for solid fuels such as bituminous/subbitumnius/lignite coal, tirederived fuel, or petroleum coke.

 Use tons/yr (as fired) for solid fuels such as bark, hog fuel, and sludge. 

 Use MMscf/yr for gaseous fuels. 

Enter the numeric higher heating value (HHV) for nonfossil fuels corresponding to the suggested units in next 

column.

Optional. EPA can assume default HHVs for fossil fuels, 

or you may opt to enter the HHV for your fossil fuel (e.g., 

if the fuel is relatively uncommon)

Specify units corresponding to the 

HHV as fired. Use 

Btu/gal for liquid fuels, 

MMBtu/ton for solid fuels, and 

Btu/MMscf for gaseous fuels.

Select from menu or write in. You 

may write in more than one condition.

Multi-fuel fired units can select "routine 

use (multi-fuel fired unit)" from the 

menu.

Approximate hours per 

year fuel used in 2009

Supplemental or other fuels for fuel-fired equipment

Supplemental fuel type 1

Supplemental fuel type 

1 amount Supplemental fuel type 1 amount units Supplemental fuel type 1 HHV (if non-fossil)

Supplemental fuel type 1 HHV 

units

Conditions when supplemental fuel 

type 1 used

hr/yr supplemental fuel 

type 1 used

#6 residual oil 153360 gal/yr 150000 Btu/gal backup 360

natural gas 155 MMscf/yr startup, backup 800

natural gas gal/yr Btu/gal routine use (multi-fuel fired unit)

#2 distillate oil tons/yr MMBtu/ton startup

#6 residual oil tons/yr (as fired) Btu/MMscf backup

turpentine MMscf/yr during upset conditions

tall oil seasonally during curtailments or peak prices

peteroleum coke when tall oil prices low

tire-derived fuel

wastewater treatment plant sludge

allow others

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 40 of 101
Additional supplemental fuel columns (for types 2-6) are hidden. Unhide and complete these columns if relevant.

Supply startup/shutdown information for equipment (including collection systems or APCDs) that appear in the 

EMSISION_UNIT_ID column (except thermal oxidizers). Enter startup/shutdown information for thermal oxidizers in the Controls 

tab.

Enter approximately how long it takes for the emission unit to startup. Use decimals if less than one hour (e.g., 18 minutes = 0.3 

hr).

Supply information for routine startup and shutdown events such as events associated with planned mill downtime. (Do not 

provide information for startup/shutdown events associated with control device or emission unit malfunctions).

"Startup" means the setting in operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. Select from menu or write in

Write in response specifying when startup ends and 

normal operation begins (e.g., Startup ends when the 

auxiliary burners switch off and material throughput 

begins to flow.)

Enter approximately how long it takes for the 

emission unit to shutdown. Use decimals if less 

than one hour (e.g., 18 minutes = 0.3 hr).

"Shutdown" means the cessation of operation of 

an affected source or portion of an affected 

source for any purpose. Select from menu or write in

Emission Unit Startup and Shutdown

Approximate duration of emission unit startup (hours)

Measures employed to reduce air emissions during 

emission unit startup (if any)

What marks the end of emission unit startup and 

beginning of normal operating conditions?

Approximate duration of emission unit 

shutdown (hours)

Measures employed to reduce air emissions during 

shutdown (if any)

0.5 backup control When full pulp flow from the digester is obtained 1

continue routing emisisons to LVHC-1 collection system and 

primary or backup control system

0.5 backup control When full pulp flow from the digester is obtained 1

continue routing emisisons to LVHC-1 collection system and 

primary or backup control system

2 backup control

stripper steam application rate reaches target; and 

begin flow of process condenstes from tank 1

stop routing process condensates to stripper before beginning 

shutdown

0.1 backup control flow through bypass ceases 0.2

NA - applicable emission and parameter limits not expected to 

be exceeded during shutdown

24

Ensure scrubber liquid is flowing during startup once LK1 

temperature reaches 200F LK1 hot end temperature reaches 2000F 18

Continue operatign scrubber until temperature in LK1 drops to 

200F

12 Operate WESP during boiler startup Steam pressure of 100 psig or greater achieved 12

emission unit and control device operates during emission unit 

startup (but not necessarily in compliance with all 

NSPS/NESHAP parameter limits) 

18 backup control

Strong liquor flow of 600 gpm at evaporator exit (55% 

solids) 16

continue routing emisisons to LVHC-1 collection system and 

primary or backup control system

12

emission unit and control device operates in compliance with 

NSPS and NESHAP parameter limits during emission unit 

startup Combustion temperature is reached 14 Temperature drops below 200F

emission unit and control device operates in compliance with 

NSPS and NESHAP parameter limits during emission unit 

startup

emission unit and control device operates in compliance with 

NSPS and NESHAP parameter limits during emission unit 

shutdown

emission unit and control device operates during emission unit 

startup (but not necessarily in compliance with all 

NSPS/NESHAP parameter limits) 

emission unit and control device operates during emission unit 

startup (but not necessarily in compliance with all 

NSPS/NESHAP parameter limits) 

backup control backup controls

NA - applicable emission and parameter limits not expected to 

be exceeded during startup

NA - applicable emission and parameter limits not expected to 

be exceeded during shutdown

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 41 of 101
Write in response specifying when shutdown 

begins and normal operation ends (e.g., 

Shutdown begins when material throughput 

ceases to flow.)

OPTIONAL QUESTION. Input on appropriate standards that would be reasonable for your pulp 

and paper source category emission units is requested. Supply recommendations for the specific 

equipment (including collection systems or APCDs) appearing in the EMSISION_UNIT_ID 

column.

What marks the end of normal operating 

conditions and beginning of emission unit 

shutdown?

Optional: Do you wish to recommend a standard that would apply during startup or 

shutdown of this emission unit? If so, please describe the event to which the standard 

would apply; the recommended standard (this could be an emission limitation, work 

practice, or operational standard) that would apply during the period; the basis for the 

recommended standard; why and how the standard would minimize emissions during the 

event; and how would compliance be determined and/or monitored. Supply as a separate 

attachment to your survey response if necessary.

Stop transfer of wood chips form the feed silo

Rule could require continued routing of emisisons to LVHC-1 collection system and primary 

and/or backup control system during digester startup and shutdown.

Stop transfer of wood chips form the feed silo

Rule could require continued routing of emisisons to LVHC-1 collection system and primary 

and/or backup control system during digester startup and shutdown.

shut off steam supply to the stripper 

Rule could require continued routing of SOG to existing primary and/or backup control system 

during stripper startup and shutdown.

flow through bypass begins

Turn down gas burner to 50% flow

Require compliance with scrubber liquid flow parameter monitoring limit, but not pressure drop 

parameter monitoring limit (since the pressure drop cannot be maintained without sufficient 

exhaust flow from the lime kiln. 

Stop charging hog fuel into boiler

Steam flow to first effect reduced by 50%

Rule could require continued routing of emisisons to LVHC-1 collection system and primary 

and/or backup control system during evaporator startup and shutdown.

Cease flow of liquor through injecction nozzles

Equip detail EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 42 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? Yes/No

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Review Draft

Complete this table for add-on air pollution controls. Questions regarding combustion controls and process changes are included elsewhere in other survey tabs.

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. This 

should match NEI Site ID 

used in other tabs.

Line IDs should match those used in other tabs such as 

the Equip detail tab.

Enter APCD_ID 

matching the 

Equip detail tab

Enter Emission Unit ID or 

Collection system ID matching 

the Equip detail tab.

Note if control device serves 

as a backup control. Select from menu or write in

Enter the 

manufacturer of 

the APCD, if 

known. Enter 

"UK" for 

unknown. Enter 

"shop-built" for 

equipment 

designed by the 

mill.

Enter the year installed, if 

known. Enter "UK" if 

unknown; or "pre-1990" if 

more than 20 years old and 

the install date is unknown. If 

the APCD was substantially 

upgraded, enter the year of 

the upgrade as XXXXupgrade.

Survey overview reference: APCD identification

Field: NEI Site ID

Line ID (Pulping line ID, Bleaching line ID, or paper 

machine Emission Unit ID) APCD_ID

Emission Unit ID(s) or 

Collection system ID(s) 

controlled Type of control device

APCD 

manufacturer (if 

known) Year installed (XXXX)

Example entry: 99999 Kraft1 ANYCONTROL ANYUNIT ANYTYPE UK pre-1990

99999 Kraft1 SCRB2 LK1, LVHC1 Scrubber Ducon 1985

99999 Kraft1 TO

STRIPPER (backup); LVHC1 

(backup) Thermal oxidizer/incinerator Coen 1999

Recovery furnace ESP (dry bottom)

Recovery furnace ESP (wet bottom)

ESP (dry)

Wet ESP (WESP)

Scrubber - venturi 

Scrubber - quench

Scrubber - packed bed

Scrubber

Absorber

Mist eliminator

Thermal oxidizer/incinerator

Regenerative thermal oxidizer

Multicyclone

Cyclone (excluding product recovery cyclones)

Fabric filter (baghouse)

Condenser

Gravel bed

Dry sorbent injection

Carbon adsorber

Selective noncatalytic reduction

Selective catalytic reduction

Other - specify type

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 43 of 101
Enter the gas 

flow rate in 

actual cubit feet 

per minute 

(acfm) at the 

inlet of the 

APCD if known.

Enter the gas 

temperature in 

degrees 

Fahrenheit at the 

inlet of the APCD 

if known.

Enter the gas 

moisture content 

(% H2O) at the 

inlet of the APCD 

if known. For 

example, enter 

"10" for 10%. 

Enter the gas 

flow rate in 

actual cubit 

feet per minute 

(acfm) exiting 

the APCD

Enter the gas 

temperature in 

degrees 

Fahrenheit 

exiting the 

APCD

Enter the gas 

moisture 

content (% 

H2O) exiting 

the APCD. For 

example, enter 

"10" for 10%. 

Enter the 

typical/design 

pressure drop 

across the 

control device in 

inches of water

Complete for 

PM control 

devices.

Enter particle 

size in 

micrometers 

(um) if known

Stack gas flow P-drop

Inlet gas flow 

rate, acfm (if 

known)

Inlet gas 

temperature, F (if 

known)

Inlet gas 

moisture 

content, % (if 

known)

Exit gas flow 

rate, acfm

Exit gas 

temperature, F

Exit gas 

moisture 

content, %

Pressure drop, 

in. H2O

Range of 

particle size 

entering 

control device 

(um)

20000 240 10 195 220 11 4 2 to 10

32000 450 25 25000 170 30 6 0.1 to 50

600 200 6 610 220 8 2

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 44 of 101
Enter control 

efficiencies , if 

known (e.g., 

enter 99 for 

99%).

Leave blank if 

not known or 

not applicable.

"Actual" control 

efficiency is a 

measured 

value. 

"Design" control 

efficiency 

reflects the 

efficiency the 

APCD was 

designed to 

achieve.

Include control 

efficiency for specific 

HAP that you identify. 

This may be HAPs used 

as surrogates in a rule 

(e.g., methanol, 

chlorine) or other HAP. 

You may attach a 

separate listing of 

HAPs and control 

efficiencies if this 

information is available 

for a number of 

compounds.

Control efficiency

Actual PM 

control 

efficiency, %

Design PM 

control 

efficiency, %

Actual TRS 

control 

efficiency, %

Design TRS 

control 

efficiency, %

Actual HCl 

control 

efficiency, %

Design HCl 

control 

efficiency, %

Actual SO2 

control 

efficiency, %

Design SO2 

control 

efficiency, %

Actual HAP control 

efficiency, %

Specify HAP for 

actual %

Design HAP control 

efficiency, %

Specify HAP for 

design %

98 99.5 90 Methanol 95 Methanol

95 92 90 82 75 50 Methanol 85 Hg

98 95

Formaldehyde, 

methanol

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 45 of 101
Complete for thermal oxidizers or 

incinerators

Select from list

Enter number of 

canisters (media 

beds) for a 

regenerative thermal 

oxidizer (RTO)

Enter target firebox 

combustion/operating 

temperature (F)

Enter time stack gases 

are exposed to the 

target temperature 

(actual or design value) Select yes/no Select from list or write in

Incinerator type

If RTO, number of 

canisters

Target firebox 

temperature (F)

Residence time at 

operating temperature 

(sec) Heat recovery

What is the recovered heat from the 

incinerator exhaust used for?

Single-stage combustion chamber NA 1300 1.8 no NA

Single-stage combustion chamber yes preheat incoming emission stream

Two-stage combustion chamber no produce steam

Regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) produce hot water

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 46 of 101
Complete for mechanical collectors. Do 

not include product collection cyclones 

in this table.

Enter number

Complete the sorbent injection 

questions for sorbents injected into the 

gas stream prior to collection by a 

fabric filter or other control device for 

which information is being provided. 

For example, complete the sorbent 

injection questions for a dry injection 

fabric filter system in the same row 

where you enter information for the 

fabric filter. Select from list or write in

Enter pounds per 

hour (lb/hr) of 

sorbent injected into 

the exhaust gas 

stream

Complete for fabric filters 

(baghouses).

Indicate the filter material and 

note if coatings are added to the 

filter material (e.g., polyester 

with PTFE coating). If no 

coating is indicated (e.g., 

polyester), the it will be 

assumed that the filter material 

is uncoated. Select from list

Enter typical bag life (or 

expected bag life), 

months

Enter number of fabric 

filter compartments. 

Enter "1" if the bagouse 

is not separated by 

different compartments.

Enter air-to-cloth 

ratio (gas flow 

divided by the filter 

bag material area)

Mechanical collectors Sorbent injection Fabric filters

Number of tubes Sorbent type

List pollutants the sorbent 

injection was installed to 

control

Sorbent injection 

rate, lb/hr

Filter material and added 

coatings Bag cleaning method

Typical bag life 

(months)

Number of 

compartments

Air-to-cloth ratio 

(acfm/ft2)

8 activated carbon Hg 100 Polyester Shake 15 1 7

activated carbon acid gases (HCl, SO2, HF) Shake

lime SO2 Reverse air

other (specify) Hg Pulse jet

dioxins

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 47 of 101
Complete the 

ESP questions 

for dry ESPs 

and WESPs

Enter number 

of fields

Enter number of 

fields used during 

normal operation. 

This may be the 

same as the total 

number of fields 

unless some fields 

are offline (e.g., for 

cleaning).

Enter the specific 

collection area (area 

of the plates divided 

by gas flow rate). 

Describe any ESP 

upgrades made within the 

last 10 years, such as 

addition of fields or other 

upgrades to increase ESP 

efficiency. If no upgrades, 

leave blank.

Complete these additional 

ESP questions for WESPs.

If a quench is used prior to 

the ESP, complete the 

scrubber questions for the 

quench.

Include water flow through 

the WESP

ESPs WESPs

Total number 

of fields

Number of fields 

used during normal 

operation

Specific collection 

area, ft2/1,000 acfm

Have fields/chambers 

been added to expand 

the ESP within the last 

10 years?

Is WESP preceded by a 

quench chamber WESP water flow, gpm

8 4 466 No No 275

Y/N Y/N

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 48 of 101
Complete for all types of 

wet scrubbers (venturi, 

tray, plate, injection, 

quench, etc)

Enter type of alkali added 

(e.g., NaOH/caustic, KOH, 

KMNO4). Leave blank if 

no alkali added.

Enter the numeric value 

for the scrubber liquid-togas ratio (L/G) in gallons 

of liquid per 1000 acfm of 

gas.

Enter numeric 

value for pH

Enter gallons per 

minute of 

scrubbing fluid 

(e.g., water) 

makeup added to 

the system

Select yes/no for scrubbers that 

control chemical recovery furnaces or 

combustion units. 

Leave blank for other scrubbers. 

Complete the 

scrubber 

questions and 

complete the 

additional 

questions 

below related 

to the packing 

material 

Scrubber Packed bed scrubbers/absorbers

Type of alkali added, if 

any

Liquid-to-gas ratio 

(gal/1000 acfm)

Inlet pH of 

scrubbing liquid

Scrubbing fluid 

make-up rate, 

gpm

For chemical recovery 

furnaces/combustors: Does 

scrubber also serve as a direct 

contact evaporator?

Type of 

packing 

material

Packing 

material 

depth, ft

Scrubber/absorber 

cross-sectional area, 

ft2

8 130 No plastic packing 3 19.6

Caustic 6 10 60

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 49 of 101
Enter water source and usage information for wet control devices 

such as wet scrubbers, WESP, mist eliminators, absorbers, etc.

Do not include spent pulping liquor used in recovery furnace wet 

bottom ESPs here (as information for wet bottom ESPs is requested 

in the Equip detail tab). Select yes/no

Enter numeric 

value in gallons 

per minute 

(gpm)

Enter numeric 

value in gallons per 

minute (gpm) of the 

water that is not 

recirculated back 

to the control 

device (i.e., 

blowdown)

Enter end use or disposal method for the 

blowdown

Water source and usage

Water source Is water recirculated?

Water 

recirculation 

rate, gpm

Wastewater 

(blowdown) 

generated, gpm

Wastewater (blowdown) reuse or disposal 

method

treated wastewater Yes 200 10 Treated in onsite wastewater treatment plant

surface water and water from recirculation pond Yes 350 35 Treated in onsite wastewater treatment plant

surface water Y/N Treated in onsite wastewater treatment plant

fresh water Recycled to mud washer(s)

process water {specify source} Recycled to SDT

treated wastewater 

Recycled to process: {specify equipment 

receiving water using Emission Unit ID OR 

APCD_ID}

partially treated wastewater {specify last wastewater treatment unit 

water passed through} POTW

mixture {specify sources} Other {specify}

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 50 of 101
Complete the solid material 

questions for control devices 

that collect or generate solid 

material to be handled or 

disposed.

Provide information for any 

solid material collected by the 

APCD (e.g., PM, sorbent, etc)

Enter the amount of solid 

material collected annually. 

Explain how the solid material is 

used or disposed. Explain where 

the material re-enters the 

process if it is reused.

Identify any other solid waste 

associated with the APCD that 

must be replaced/disposed 

periodically (e.g., packing 

material, ceramic saddles) 

Enter the frequency in which the 

material must be 

replaced/disposed, etc. 

Enter the amount of material that 

must be replaced/disposed. 

Explain how the solid material is 

used or disposed. Explain where 

the material re-enters the 

process if it is reused.

Solid material handling and disposal

Type of material collected Solid material collected, ton/yr 

End use/method of disposal 

for solid material collected

Identify any other solid waste 

associated with the APCD

Frequency of material 

replacement/disposal Amount of material, tons

End use/method of disposal 

for solid material collected

carbon sorbent laden with PM 410 landfilled onsite degraded packing material 5 yr 0.5 landfill offsite

PM landfill

PM and sorbent reuse {specify}

Sorbent

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 51 of 101
Select from list or write in

List any operating parameters not included 

in the previous column

OPTIONAL: Supply approximate 

capital costs of the parameter 

monitoring system equipment 

installed within the past 10 years for 

this control device. Include in the 

equipment costs the analyzer and 

data acquisition system (DAS), if 

known. 

OPTIONAL: Enter year for 

parameter monitoring system costs

Parameter monitoring

List continuous parameter monitoring 

systems used for this control device 

(e.g., pressure drop, liquid flow)

Please list below any additional 

operating parameters that are either 

monitored or that are important for 

proper operation of the APCD, and 

include average values and units. 

Capital costs of parameter 

monitoring system, $

Base year for parameter 

monitoring system capital cost 

(e.g., 2005)

liquid flow, voltage carbon injection rate (100 lb/hr)

pressure drop, liquid flow rate 34500 2007

combustion chamber temperature 22000 1999

pressure drop

liquid flow rate

voltage

current

temperature (specify if inlet, outlet, bed, or other temperature)

pH

percent solids in recycle water

other (specify)

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 52 of 101
Supply startup/shutdown information for the equipment 

that appears in the APCD_ID column.

Enter approximately how long it takes for the control 

device to startup. Use decimals if less than one hour 

(e.g., 18 minutes = 0.3 hr). 

Supply information for routine startup and shutdown 

events such as events associated with planned mill 

downtime. (Do not provide information for 

startup/shutdown events associated with control device or 

emission unit malfunctions).

"Startup" means the setting in operation of an affected 

source or portion of an affected source for any purpose.

Select from menu, expand on menu response, and/or 

write in. 

For example, is a certain gas flow rate from the emission 

unit required before the control device operating 

parameter limits can be met? Is a certain heating value 

from the emission unit exhaust gas required to achieve 

control device temperature?

List any control device parameter limits that cannot be 

met during control device startup. Certain parameters 

may be "instant on" while others are more transient in 

nature. Examples could include control device 

temperature that must heat up to a set point, or pressure 

drop that cannot be achieved due to low exhaust gas flow 

from the emission unit. 

The EPA is particularly interested in emission limits or 

parameter limits originating from the pulp and paper 

NSPS or NESHAP that cannot be met during control 

device startup or shutdown.

Select from menu if the applicable emission and 

parameter limits are expected to be met during startup. Write in response (if any).

Control Device Startup and Shutdown

Approximate duration of control device startup 

(hours)

Explain how control device startup is integrated with 

(dependent upon) emission unit startup/operation

List any control device continuous emissions 

monitoring or operating parameter limits that cannot 

be met during control device startup

Measures employed to reduce air emissions 

during control device startup (if any)

0.4

Need airflow from emission unit of at least 10,000 acfm in 

order for injected carbon to properly mix and become 

entrained in gas stream carbon injection rate

Ensure water is recirculated through control device 

throughout startup

3

Control device cannot function as designed unless an air 

flow rate of 29,000 acfm from the emission unit is 

achieved. pressure drop meet liquid flow parameter limit

4 temperature set point

bring TO temperature to 1400F before routing NCG 

or SOG to the TO

Control device is started up and meets required operating 

parameter limits before emission unit is started up.

The applicable emission and parameter limits are 

expected to be met during startup

Control device cannot be started prior to emission unit 

starting up due to safety issue or risk of property damage. 

{Explain}

Control device cannot function as designed unless an air 

flow rate of {specify } acfm from the emission unit is 

achieved.

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 53 of 101
Write in response specifying when control device 

startup ends and normal operation begins (e.g., Startup 

ends when oxidizer temperature set point of 1200F is 

reached.)

Enter approximately how long it takes for the 

control device to shutdown. Use decimals if less 

than one hour (e.g., 18 minutes = 0.3 hr).

"Shutdown" means the cessation of operation of an 

affected source or portion of an affected source for 

any purpose.

Select from menu, expand on menu response, 

and/or write in. 

For example, is a certain gas flow rate from the 

emission unit required for the control device 

operating parameter limits to be met? Is a certain 

heating value from the emission unit exhaust gas 

required to achieve control device temperature?

List any control device parameter limits that cannot 

be met during control device shutdown. Certain 

parameters may be "instant off" while others are 

more transient in nature. Examples could include 

control device temperature that decreases from the 

set point as shutdown progresses, or pressure drop 

that cannot be achieved due to low exhaust gas 

flow from the emission unit. 

The EPA is particularly interested in emission limits 

or parameter limits originating from the pulp and 

paper NSPS or NESHAP that cannot be met during 

control device startup or shutdown.

Select from menu if the applicable emission and 

parameter limits are expected to be met during 

shutdown.

What marks the end of control device startup and 

beginning of normal operating conditions?

Approximate duration of control device 

shutdown (hours)

Explain how control device shutdown is 

integrated with (dependent upon) emission unit 

shutdown

List any control device continuous emissions 

monitoring or operating parameter limits that 

cannot be met during control device startup

route emission unit exhaust damper to control device 

and switch on carbon injection once process exhaust 

gas reaches 10,000 acfm 0.4

Need airflow from emission unit of at least 10,000 

acfm in order for injected carbon to properly mix 

and become entrained in gas stream carbon injection rate

Startup ends when the pressure drop parameter limit 

range is achieved 0.5

Control device cannot function as designed unless 

an air flow rate of 29,000 acfm from the emission 

unit is achieved.

Combustion temperature reaches 1400F 4

Control device continues to operate and meets 

required operating limits while emission unit is shut 

down or re-routed. temperature set point

Control device continues to operate and meets 

required operating limits while emission unit is shut 

down.

The applicable emission and parameter limits are 

expected to be met during shutdown

Control device cannot operate during emission unit 

shut down due to safety issue or risk of property 

damage. {Explain}

Control device cannot function as designed unless 

an air flow rate of {specify } acfm from the emission 

unit is achieved.

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 54 of 101
Select from menu or write in

Write in response specifying when shutdown 

begins and normal operation ends (e.g., 

Shutdown begins when the burners are shut 

off.)

OPTIONAL QUESTION. Input on appropriate standards that would be reasonable for your pulp and 

paper source category control system is requested. Supply recommendations for the specific APCD 

appearing in the APCD_ID column.

Enter the amount of control device 

downtime (hr/yr). Include downtime when 

the process would otherwise be operating, 

including time when the process currently 

continues to operate (e.g., under an 

excess emissions allowance) and time 

when the process is shut down because 

the control device is down. 

This question does not apply for backup 

controls (simply enter "Backup control")

Measures employed to reduce air emissions during 

control device shutdown (if any)

What marks the end of normal operating 

conditions and beginning of control device 

shutdown?

Optional: Do you wish to recommend a standard that would apply during startup or shutdown of 

this control device? If so, please describe the event to which the standard would apply; the 

recommended standard (this could be an emission limitation, work practice, or operational 

standard) that would apply during the period; the basis for the recommended standard; why and 

how the standard would minimize emissions during the event; and how would compliance be 

determined and/or monitored. Supply as a separate attachment to your survey response if 

necessary.

Annual control device downtime (when 

process controlled would otherwise be 

operating), hr/yr

Continue injection of carbon until process gas flow drops to 

10,000 acfm; continue water recirculation unit emission unit 

switched off

When process gas flow drops to 10,000 acfm 

and carbon injection is shut off

Require compliance with liquid flow parameter limit during startup and shutdown (but not carbon injection 

rate limit) 100

Wait until LK is cooled to 200F before switching off liquid 

flow. Shut off liquid flow

Meet liquid flow parameter limits during startup and shutdown (but not the pressure drop drop parameter 

limit because it can only be achieved during normal operation) 40

Route NCG and/or SOG back to primary control NCG/SOG re-routed to primary control device Cease firing NCG or SOG during TO shutdown (route NCG and SOG to primary control device) Backup control

Backup control

Controls EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 55 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for sub

Review Draft

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table. Your response may consist of one or more rows.

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. This 

should match NEI Site ID 

used in other tabs.

Provide for all entries. Line 

IDs should match those used 

in other tabs such as the 

Equip detail tab. Select yes/no

Survey overview reference: New equipment

Field: NEI Site ID Pulping line ID

Does the mill plan to commence 

construction of any new affected 

facilities that could potentially become 

subject to NSPS subpart BB or 

NESHAP subpart MM within the next 8 

years (e.g., between 2009 and 2017)

If yes, please indicate the 

approximate year that the 

construction will commence 

If yes, please specify the type of NSPS or 

NESHAP subpart MM affected facilities 

that might be constructed

Example entry: 99999 P1 yes 2011 add new lime kiln

yes

no

Potential changes EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 56 of 101
Yes/No

ment for submitting CBI.

Select yes/no Select yes/no

Modified/reconstructed equipment Black liquor gasification

Does the mill plan to commence 

modification or reconstruction of 

any equipment within the next 8 

years (e.g., between 2009 and 2017) 

that could potentially for the first 

time become subject to NSPS 

subpart BB?

If yes, please specify the affected 

facilities to be modified or 

reconstructed and describe the 

changes that might be made

Does the mill plan to construct a 

new black liquor gasification 

system with the next 8 years (e.g., 

between 2009 and 2017)?

If yes, indicate Emission Unit IDs 

of existing boilers, lime kilns, or 

other equipment that will burn the 

syngas produced by the black 

liquor gasifier/pyrolysis system 

(either before or after production 

of liquid fuels)

If yes, indicate Emission Unit IDs 

of existing recovery furnaces that 

may be retired and replaced with 

the black liquor gasification 

system

Will the black liquor gasifier be 

used to supply heat and electric 

power; or be used to generate 

liquid fuels (or both)

no yes new lime kiln RF-1 heat/electric power

yes yes heat/electric power

no no liquid fuels

heat/electric power and liquid fuels

Potential changes EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 57 of 101
Select yes/no. Select yes/no.

Value prior to pulping (VPP) technology Woody biomass gasification

Does the mill plan to install value 

prior to pulping (VPP) technology 

for recovery of ethanol or other 

chemicals within the next 8 

years?

If yes, please describe the VPP 

technology planned to be 

installed.

Does the mill plan to install 

woody biomass gasification or 

pyrolysis technology within the 

next 8 years?

If yes, indicate Emission Unit IDs 

of existing boilers, lime kilns, or 

other equipment that will burn the 

syngas produced by the biomass 

gasifier/pyrolysis system (either 

before or after production of 

liquid fuels)

If yes, indicate Emission Unit IDs of 

existing boilers (or other equipment) 

that may be retired and replaced 

with the biomass 

gasification/pyrolysis system

no no

yes yes

no no

Potential changes EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 58 of 101
Select yes/no Select yes/no

Retiring equipment Low-odor conversions (DCE-->NDCE)

Does the mill plan to retire any equipment 

subject to NESHAP subpart MM within the 

next 8 years (e.g., between 2009 and 

2017)?

If yes, specify Emission Unit IDs to 

be retired

Does the mill plan any lowodor conversions of 

recovery furnaces in the 

next 8 years (e.g., between 

2009 and 2017)?

If yes, specify Emission Unit IDs 

that might be converted:

yes RF-1 no

yes yes

no no

Potential changes EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 59 of 101
Select yes/no Select yes/no

ESP conversions New control measures

Does the mill plan to change any 

recovery furnace ESP systems 

from a wet bottom ESP to a dry 

bottom ESP in the next 8 years 

(e.g., between 2009 and 2017)?

If yes, specify APCD_IDs that might be 

converted:

Does the mill plan to install any 

additional or new PM, HAP, TRS, 

NOx, SO2, or CO control 

devices/measures on equipment 

subject to NSPS subpart BB or 

NESHAP subpart MM within the next 

8 years (e.g., between 2009 and 

2017)? 

If yes, specify Emission Unit IDs to 

be controlled and control 

devices/measures that might be 

installed

no no

yes yes

no no

Potential changes EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 60 of 101
Select yes/no

PCC plants

Does the mill plan to begin 

routing boiler or lime kiln exhaust 

to an onsite PCC plant within the 

next 8 years?

If yes, Emission Unit IDs 

likely to be routed to the 

PCC plant

yes LK1

yes

no

Potential changes EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 61 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview 

Review Draft

Use this table for pulp produced onsite. Do not include pulp purchases in this table.

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table

Mills can have one or more rows in this table depending on the number of pulping processes/lines at the mill. 

Complete the columns that are applicable for each pulp type, leaving the inapplicable columns blank.

Provide data for the 2009 operating year.

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. 

This should match NEI 

Site ID used in other tabs. Select from menu

Provide for all entries. Line IDs should match those 

used in other tabs such as the Equip detail tab.

Survey overview reference: Pulping line identification

Field: NEI Site ID Pulping processes Pulping line ID

Example entry: 99999 kraft P1

kraft

soda

semi-chemical

sulfite-Na

sulfite-Mg

sulfite-NH3

sulfite-Ca

stone groundwood (SGW)

pressurized groundwood (PGW)

thermo-mechanical pulping (TMP)

refiner mechanical pulping (RMP)

secondary fiber

non-wood

Pulp prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 62 of 101
 entered in this tab contain CBI? Yes/No

s red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Enter numeric 

value for 2009

Enter numeric value 

for 2009

Enter numeric 

value in air 

dried tons of 

pulp per year 

(ADTP/yr)

Enter numeric 

value in air 

dried tons of 

pulp per day 

(ADTP/d)

Enter decimal 

percent for 

utilization (e.g., 0.7 

for 70% of capacity 

utilized)

Enter decimal percent for 

utilization (e.g., 0.7 for 70% of 

capacity utilized) for the past 5 

years. To determine the 5-year 

utilization, average the utilization 

percentages for 2005, 2006, 2007, 

2008, and 2009.

Operating hr/yr Operating hr/d

Pulp capacity 

ADTP/yr in 

2009

Pulp capacity 

ADTP/d in 

2009

Pulp capacity 

utilization 

percentage in 

2009

5-year average (2005-2009) pulp 

capacity utilization percentage

8500 24 340000 950 0.8 0.95

Pulp prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 63 of 101
Virgin wood fiber 

sources. 

Select yes/no to 

indicate virgin fiber 

source(s) used

Virgin wood fiber 

(approximate 

decimal percent 

across all virgin 

wood fiber sources)

How does the mill use the pulp it 

produces from virgin wood fiber? 

Enter approximate decimal 

percentage of the pulp capacity in 

(ADTP/yr supplied to the left).

Enter approximate decimal 

percentages of the pulp capacity in 

(ADTP/yr supplied to the left).

Virgin wood fiber sources

Chips produced 

onsite

Chips produced 

offsite Sawmill residues Virgin SW % Virgin HW %

Approximate percentage of 

virgin wood pulp that is 

bleached onsite

Approximate percentage of virgin 

wood pulp sold as unbleached 

market pulp

Approximate percentage of 

virgin wood pulp used 

onsite to manufacture 

unbleached 

paper/paperboard?

Check 

(=1)

yes yes no 20 80 1 0.25 0.75 1

yes yes yes 0

no no no

Pulp prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 64 of 101
Complete for mechanical 

wood pulps produced 

onsite.

Select yes/no Select yes/no Select yes/no

Mechanical wood pulps

Is the mechanical pulp 

brightened? 

If yes, indicate the 

chemicals used for 

brightening

For TMP or pressurized 

groundwood systems, is a 

heat recovery system 

used?

no no no

yes yes yes

no no no

Pulp prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 65 of 101
Specify the 

recycled material 

used for 

secondary fiber 

pulping.

Provide approximate 

decimal percentages of 

secondary fiber capacity 

(ADTP/yr supplied to the 

left).

How does the mill use the pulp it 

produces from secondary fiber? 

Enter approximate decimal percentage 

of the pulp capacity in (ADTP/yr 

supplied to the left).

Enter approximate decimal 

percentages of the pulp capacity in 

(ADTP/yr supplied to the left).

Recycled/secondary fiber pulps

Mixed paper % High grade deinked % ONP % OCC % Pulp substitute %

Approximate percentage of 

secondary fiber pulp sold as 

unbleached market pulp

Approximate percentage of 

secondary fiber pulp used onsite 

to manufacture unbleached 

paper/paperboard?

Other (specify use 

and approximate 

percentage) Check (=1)

0

manufacture paper/paperboard products 0

sell as market pulp

NA - not producing pulp from secondary fiber

Pulp prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 66 of 101
Non-wood pulping material.

Select from list

How does the mill use the 

non-wood pulp it produces? 

Enter approximate decimal 

percentage of the pulp 

capacity in (ADTP/yr 

supplied to the left).

Enter approximate decimal 

percentages of the pulp 

capacity in (ADTP/yr supplied to 

the left).

Non-wood pulps

Non-wood material

Approximate percentage 

of nonwood pulp that is 

bleached onsite

Approximate percentage of 

nonwood pulp sold as 

unbleached market pulp

Approximate percentage of 

nonwood pulp used onsite to 

manufacture unbleached 

paper/paperboard?

Check 

(=1)

0

bagasse 0

kenaf

cotton

other {specify}

Pulp prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 67 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Review Draft

Each pulp mill producing turpentine and/or tall oil should have one row in this table.

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table.

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. This 

should match NEI Site ID 

used in other tabs. Enter numeric value Enter numeric value Insert Emission Unit IDs separated by commas

Survey overview reference: Turpentine

Field: NEI Site ID Turpentine production, hr/yr Turpentine production, gal/day

Pulping lines supplying turpentine 

production (insert Pulping line IDs)

Digesters supplying turpentine production (insert 

Emission Unit IDs)

Example entry: 99999 8500 700 P1 DIG-1, DIG-2

Byproducts EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 68 of 101
Yes/No

bmitting CBI.

Enter numeric value Select from menu. Enter numeric value (if batch)

Tall oil

Tall oil production, ton tall oil/yr

Pulping lines supplying tall oil production 

(insert Pulping line IDs)

Digesters supplying tall oil production (insert 

Emission Unit IDs)

Is tall oil acidulation reactor batch or 

continous? Batch reactor cycle time (hr)

220000 P1 DIG-1, DIG-2 continuous

batch

continuous

Byproducts EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 69 of 101
Enter numeric value (if batch) Enter numeric value (if continuous) Enter numeric value (if continuous)

Batch reactor cycles per day

Continuous or batch tall oil reactor operation, 

day/yr

Continuous tall oil reactor tons 

tall oil per hour

365 25

Byproducts EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 70 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of 

Review Draft

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. This 

should match NEI Site ID used 

in other tabs.

Common condensate sources are listed 

below. You may add rows for additional 

condensate sources or delete rows as 

needed.

Line IDs should match 

those used in other tabs 

such as the Equip detail 

tab.

Enter Emission Unit ID or 

Collection system ID 

matching the Equip detail 

tab

Survey overview reference:

Field: NEI Site ID Kraft condensate streams Pulping line ID

Emission Unit IDs (or 

Collection System IDs for 

HVLC or LVHC systems)

Example entry: 99999 Digester systems P1 DIG-1, DIG-2

99999 P1 DIG-3

99999 Evaporator systems P1 EVAP-1

Digester systems

Turpentine recovery systems

Evaporator systems

HVLC collection systems

LVHC collection systems

Pull down menu text:

Kraft condensates EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 71 of 101
u entered in this tab contain CBI? Yes/No

s red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

If no, complete column B. If yes, 

complete columns C-F to specify 

the applicable method of 

condensate treatment.

The volume reduction options are specified in subpart S at §63.446(c)(2) or 

(3). Select from the following codes:

NA - system does not exist at mill

1 - Mill collects/controls pulping process condensate streams containing a 

combined total of at least 65 percent of the total HAP mass from each 

digester system, turpentine recovery system, and evaporator system 

according to 63.446(c)(2).

2A - Mill collects/controls pulping process condensate streams containing a 

combined total of at least 7.2 lb total HAP/ton ODP, according to 

63.446(c)(3), for mills that DO NOT perform bleaching.

2B -Mill collects/controls pulping process condensate streams containing a 

combined total of at least 11.1 lb total HAP/ton ODP, according to 

63.446(c)(3), for mills that perform bleaching. Specify Emission Unit ID(s)

Select from menu. Control options are 

described in the survey overview 

document. 

A B C

Is condensate stream 

collected and treated 

according to subpart S?

Indicate volume reduction option being used, or other reason why 

condensate stream is not collected and controlled

For condensates treated by recycling 

to equipment meeting the kraft 

pulping system vent standards, 

specify the equipment Emission Unit 

ID receiving recycled condensates.

For condensates treated by steam 

stripping, specify the control option 

used

N 2B

Y WASHER Remove 10.2 pounds/ton ODP

Y

Y/N NA-system does not exist at mill 92% total HAP reduction (by weight) 

1 Remove 6.6 pounds/ton ODP

2A

210 ppmw at the outlet of the control 

device

2B Remove 10.2 pounds/ton ODP

330 ppmw at the outlet of the control 

device

Remove prorated mass of ___ 

pounds/ton ODP {specify limit}

Kraft condensates EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 72 of 101
Include the date/result from your 

most recent compliance 

demonstration. 

You may enter the date/results 

from more than one compliance 

demonstration (e.g., initial and 

subsequent demonstrations as 

shown in the example). If 

necessary, submit results for 

multiple compliance 

demonstrations in a separate 

attachment.

Select from menu. Control options 

are described in the survey overview 

document. 

Include the date/result from your most 

recent compliance demonstration. 

You may enter the date/results from 

more than one compliance 

demonstration (e.g., initial and 

subsequent demonstrations as shown 

in the example). If necessary, submit 

results for multiple compliance 

demonstrations in a separate 

attachment.

Note: If an onsite 

wastewater treatment 

plant is used for 

biological treatment of 

kraft condensates, then 

in addition to the 

question below, you are 

asked in the WW tab to 

supply the results of the 

four quartlerly tests 

conducted in calendar 

year 2009.

D E

Date of compliance 

demonstration(s)

Emission limit achieved (include 

units of measure)

For condensates treated by 

biological treatment, specify the 

control option used

Date of compliance 

demonstration(s)

Emission limit 

achieved (include 

units of measure)

(1) 3/29/2001; (2) 5/15/2007

(1) Removed 15.7 lb HAP/ton ODP; 

(2) Removed 12.3 lb HAP/ton ODP

92% total HAP reduction (by weight) 6/30/2009 94%

92% total HAP reduction (by weight) 

Remove 6.6 pounds/ton ODP

210 ppmw at the outlet of the control 

device

Remove 10.2 pounds/ton ODP

330 ppmw at the outlet of the control 

device

Remove prorated mass of ___ 

pounds/ton ODP {specify limit}

Kraft condensates EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 73 of 101
Write in condensate treatment method 

(e.g., wastewater thermal oxidizer)

Select from menu. Control options are 

described in the survey overview 

document. 

Include the date/result from your 

most recent compliance 

demonstration. 

You may enter the date/results from 

more than one compliance 

demonstration (e.g., initial and 

subsequent demonstrations as 

shown in the example). If 

necessary, submit results for 

multiple compliance demonstration 

in a separate attachment.

F

Specify condensate treatment method 

(if other than steam stripping or 

biological treatment) Specify the control option used

Date of compliance 

demonstration(s)

Emission limit achieved 

(include units of measure)

92% total HAP reduction (by weight) 

Remove 6.6 pounds/ton ODP

210 ppmw at the outlet of the control 

device

Remove 10.2 pounds/ton ODP

330 ppmw at the outlet of the control 

device

Remove prorated mass of ___ 

pounds/ton ODP {specify limit}

Kraft condensates EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 74 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the surv

Review Draft

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. This should 

match NEI Site ID used in other tabs.

Enter the pulping line ID 

associated with the Emission 

Unit ID routing exhaust to the 

PCC plant

Enter Emission Unit ID 

routing exhaust to the 

PCC plant. This should 

match the Emission Unit 

ID in the Equip detail tab. Select yes/no

Survey overview reference:

Field: NEI Site ID Pulping line ID

Emission Unit ID 

routing exhaust to a 

PCC plant 

Does exhaust pass through the 

emission unit air pollution control 

device(s) prior to being routed to 

PCC plant?

Example entry: 99999 P1 LK1 yes

yes

no

PCC EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 75 of 101
 this tab contain CBI? Yes/No

low the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

If answer to the previous question is 

no, please explain if exhaust does not 

pass through the full emission control 

system prior to being routed to the 

PCC plant. Enter numeric value

This will be 1 (for 100%), unless if the 

exhaust stream in split such that only a 

portion of the volume goes to the PCC 

plant.

Enter decimal percent (e.g., enter "0.15" 

for 15%) Specify Select yes/no

If the PCC plant is NOT located 

on mill property, please enter 

physical street address for PCC 

plant

PCC_LOCATION_ADDRESS

If no, explain control configuration 

relevant to the exhaust stream 

routed to the PCC plant

hr/yr exhaust routed to 

PCC plant

Volume percent of exhaust stream 

routed to PCC plant Owner of PCC plant

Is PCC plant located on 

P&P mill property PCC Facility Street Address

1500 0.15 Carbonate Minerals, Inc no 1400 Plant Road

yes

no

PCC EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 76 of 101
If the PCC plant is NOT 

located on mill property, 

please enter city for PCC plant

If the PCC plant is NOT 

located on mill property, 

please enter state for PCC 

plant

If the PCC plant is NOT 

located on mill property, 

please enter zip code for PCC 

plant

Longitude measured in 

decimal degrees of the angular 

distance on a meridian east or 

west of the prime meridian. 

Negative (-) data point for N 

America. Include (-) sign, Ex. -

123.234561. For point sources 

this represents the center of 

the source. Enter PCC 

longitude here. Specify 

decimal degrees to at least 6 

digits to the right of the 

decimal point. 

Latitude measured in decimal 

degrees of the angular distance 

on a meridian north or south of 

the equator. Positive (+) data 

point for N America. Include (+) 

sign, Ex. +78.123456. For point 

sources this represents the 

center of the source. Enter PCC 

latitude here. Specify decimal 

degrees to at least 6 digits to the 

right of the decimal point. 

Answer "no" unless the PCC 

plant is included in your title V 

permit

PCC_CITY PCC_STATE PCC_ZIPCODE PCC_Longitude (decimal PCC Latitude (decimal degrees)

PCC Facility City PCC Facility State PCC Facility Zip Code

PCC Facility Longitude 

(decimal degrees) Latitude (decimal degrees)

Does the PCC plant have a 

separate air permit from the 

P&P mill?

Anytown VA 24553 -78.9104538 37.51063156 no

yes

no

PCC EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 77 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? Yes/No

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Review Draft

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table

Complete this spreadsheet tab once for each set of CCA compliance calculations used by a mill. As an alternative to completing this tab, you may submit documentation of your CCA calculations used for purposes of showing compliance.

You will have 1 row of data in the left-hand table of this tab (emission balance), and multiple rows in the right-hand table in this tab (CCA equipment list) 

Notes:

Sources eligible for inclusion in the CCA as credit generators include: pulping systems, bleaching systems, causticizing systems, and papermaking systems. 

Debit generating sources can include equipment from the kraft mill HVLC system, including: pulp washing systems, knotter systems, screen systems, decker systems, O2 delignification systems, and weak liquor storage tanks.

Refer to the system definitions in subpart S at §§63.441 and 63.447(a).

EPA is not requesting detailed calculations used to show compliance with the CCA at this time. However, EPA reserves the right to request additional detail if needed as a follow-up to this survey. 

Emissions Balance Your response will consist of one row on this left side of the orange line.

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. This 

should match NEI Site ID 

used in other tabs.

Baseline emissions are measured after compliance has 

been achieved with the kraft pulping process condensate 

standards, and to revised effluent limitations guidelines and 

standards in 40 CFR 430 subpart B. The baseline HAP 

emissions are determined according to §63.447(d).

HAP emission reductions from baseline 

are required to be determined in 

§63.447(e). 

Survey overview 

reference:

Field: NEI Site ID Baseline emissions (kg total HAP/Mg ODP)

Emission reductions expected through 

compliance with the kraft pulping 

system standards (kg total HAP/Mg 

ODP)

Emission reductions expected through 

compliance with the CCA (kg total 

HAP/Mg ODP)

Year compliance last 

demonstrated using CCA

How many times has the mill changed the CCA compliance 

strategy (e.g., changed debit or credit emission points) since 

first demonstrating compliance with the CCA? Please 

indicate the year(s) of the change(s). 

Example entry: 99999 0.68 0.22 0.34 2007 once - 2007

CCA EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 78 of 101
CCA Equipment List Your response will consist of miltuple rows on this right side of the orange line.

Instruction:

Your response will be multiple 

rows on this side of the orange 

line

You may add rows to this table to 

accommodate additional emission 

units

Complete for each emissions unit 

involved in a CCA calculation. List each 

emission unit on a separate row and 

indicate whether it generates debits or 

credits in the CCA calculation. Select from menu

List control technology for creditgenerating emission units. If 

applicable, list technology applied for 

under-controlled debit-generating units 

as well. List parameters

Survey overview reference:

Field: NEI Site ID

Line ID (Pulping line ID, Bleaching 

line ID, or paper machine Emission 

Unit ID) Emission Unit ID

CCA debit or credit generating 

emission point?

Clean condensate alterative 

technology applied

Parameters monitored for clean 

condensate alterative technology

Example entry: 99999 Kraft1 BSW1 debit (uncontrolled) NA-debit source

99999 PM2 PM2 credit

other - maintain paper machine white 

water methanol concentration below 20 

mg/l by draining a portion of the 

methanol-concentrated liquid from the 

pulp stock and replacing it with cleaner 

water

paper machine throughput; and methanol 

concentration (mg/l) in the stock blend 

tanks (SBT3), machine chest (PM2MC), 

and saveall (SVT)

debit (uncontrolled) NA-debit source

debit (under controlled) stand-alone biological treatment unit

credit steam stripper

other - specify

CCA EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 79 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Review Draft

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. This 

should match NEI Site ID 

used in other tabs.

This section (to the left of the 

orange line) is to be completed 

by all mills that perform any 

type of bleaching.

Line IDs should match those 

used in other tabs such as the 

Equip detail tab. Select yes/no Select yes/no

Select from menu. Please 

explain if the bleaching process 

cannot be characterized as ECF, 

PCF, or TCF.

Survey overview reference:

Field: NEI Site ID Bleaching line ID

Are chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in any 

stage of the bleaching line?

Is the bleaching line 

preceded by O2 

delignification?

Is the process ECF, PCF or 

TCF?

Example entry: 99999 B1 yes yes ECF - elemental chlorine free

yes yes ECF - elemental chlorine free

no no PCF - processed chlorine free

TCF - totally chlorine free

Bleaching EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 80 of 101
Yes/No

of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Use the following bleaching sequence notation:

 C-Chlorine (Cl2)

 D-Chlorine dioxide (ClO2)

 E-Alkaline extraction (NaOH etc)

 P-Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2)

 O-Oxygen (O2)

 H-Hypochlorite (NaClO)

 Z-Ozone (O3)

 M-Monox-L

 X-Enzyme (xylanase)

 SO2-SO2

Add other notation for bleaching stages not 

represented above.

Enter the decimal percent 

chlorine dioxide substitution 

(e.g., enter 0.90 for 90%; enter 1 

for 100%)

Enter numeric 

value

Enter numeric 

value for air dried 

tons of bleached 

pulp per year 

(ADTBP/yr)

Enter numeric 

value for air 

dried tons of 

bleached pulp 

per day 

(ADTBP/d)

How does the mill use the 

bleached pulp produced? 

Determine the approximate 

decimal percentage requested 

based on bleached pulp capacity 

in ADTBP/yr.

Bleaching sequence

Percent chlorine dioxide 

substitution

Bleach plant 

operating 

hr/yr

2009 bleached 

capacity, 

ADTBP/yr

2009 

bleached 

capacity, 

ADTBP/d

Approximate decimal 

percentage of bleaching line 

capacity sold as bleached 

market pulp

Approximate decimal 

percentage of bleaching line 

capacity used to 

manufacture paper or 

paperboard onsite

Check 

(=1)

DED(DOP) 1 8500 6500 16 0.15 0.85 1

0

Bleaching EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 81 of 101
This section (to the 

right of the orange 

line) is to be 

completed for 

bleaching systems 

that use any 

chlorine or 

chlorinated 

compounds.

Enter numeric value 

in oven dried tons 

per year (ODT/yr) 

Enter numeric value in 

oven dried tons per 

day (ODT/d) Select from list Select yes/no

Each bleaching stage 

includes the tower 

vent, washer hood, 

seal tank vent, 

chemical and steam 

mixers, and vacuum 

pumps Select from list Select from list

Design capacity, 

ODT/yr

Design capacity, 

ODT/d Material type

Bleaching stage 1 

use chlorine or 

chlorinated 

compounds?

Stage 1 control 

method

Stage 1 chlorofrom control 

option(s) used to demonstrate 

subpart S compliance

Stage 1 chlorinated HAP control 

option used to demonstrate 

subpart S compliance

5475 15 mixture of HW and SW Yes SCBR_BL1 Meet effluent guidelines/standards

99% reduction (by weight) 

measured as total chlorinated HAP

HW only Y/N NA

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage)

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage)

SW only

scrubber {enter 

APCD_ID}

NA (mechanical, non-wood, or 

secondary fiber mill)

99% reduction (by weight) 

measured as total chlorinated HAP

mixture of HW and SW

Use no chlorine or hypochlorite 

AND meet effluent 

guidelines/standards

99% reduction (by weight) 

measured as methanol

secondary fiber Use no chlorine or hypochlorite

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as total chlorinated HAP

non-wood fiber Meet effluent guidelines/standards

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as methanol

Total outlet mass emission levels 

for all subject stages < 0.002 lb/ton 

ODP

Bleaching EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 82 of 101
Select yes/no

Each bleaching stage 

includes the tower 

vent, washer hood, 

seal tank vent, 

chemical and steam 

mixers, and vacuum 

pumps Select from list Select from list Select yes/no

Each bleaching stage 

includes the tower 

vent, washer hood, 

seal tank vent, 

chemical and steam 

mixers, and vacuum 

pumps Select from list Select from list

Bleaching stage 2 

use chlorine or 

chlorinated 

compounds?

Stage 2 control 

method

Stage 2 chlorofrom control 

option(s) used to demonstrate 

subpart S compliance

Stage 2 chlorinated HAP control 

option used to demonstrate 

subpart S compliance

Bleaching stage 3 

use chlorine or 

chlorinated 

compounds?

Stage 3 control 

method

Stage 3 chlorofrom control 

option(s) used to demonstrate 

subpart S compliance

Stage 3 chlorinated HAP 

control option used to 

demonstrate subpart S 

compliance

No SCBR_BL2

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage)

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage) Yes SCBR_BL1 Meet effluent guidelines/standards

99% reduction (by weight) 

measured as total chlorinated 

HAP

Y/N NA

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage)

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage) Y/N NA

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage)

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage)

scrubber {enter 

APCD_ID}

NA (mechanical, non-wood, or 

secondary fiber mill)

99% reduction (by weight) measured 

as total chlorinated HAP

scrubber {enter 

APCD_ID}

NA (mechanical, non-wood, or 

secondary fiber mill)

99% reduction (by weight) 

measured as total chlorinated 

HAP

Use no chlorine or hypochlorite AND 

meet effluent guidelines/standards

99% reduction (by weight) measured 

as methanol

Use no chlorine or hypochlorite 

AND meet effluent 

guidelines/standards

99% reduction (by weight) 

measured as methanol

Use no chlorine or hypochlorite

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as total chlorinated HAP Use no chlorine or hypochlorite

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as total chlorinated 

HAP

Meet effluent guidelines/standards

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as methanol Meet effluent guidelines/standards

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as methanol

Total outlet mass emission levels for 

all subject stages < 0.002 lb/ton ODP

Total outlet mass emission levels 

for all subject stages < 0.002 

lb/ton ODP

Bleaching EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 83 of 101
Select yes/no

Each bleaching stage 

includes the tower 

vent, washer hood, 

seal tank vent, 

chemical and steam 

mixers, and vacuum 

pumps Select from list Select from list Select yes/no

Each bleaching stage 

includes the tower 

vent, washer hood, 

seal tank vent, 

chemical and steam 

mixers, and vacuum 

pumps Select from list Select from list

Bleaching stage 4 

use chlorine or 

chlorinated 

compounds?

Stage 4 control 

method

Stage 4 chlorofrom control option(s) 

used to demonstrate subpart S 

compliance

Stage 4 chlorinated HAP control 

option used to demonstrate 

subpart S compliance

Bleaching stage 5 

use chlorine or 

chlorinated 

compounds?

Stage 5 control 

method

Stage 5 chlorofrom control 

option(s) used to demonstrate 

subpart S compliance

Stage 5 chlorinated HAP control 

option used to demonstrate subpart S 

compliance

Yes SCBR_BL2 Meet effluent guidelines/standards

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as methanol

Y/N NA

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage)

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage) Y/N NA

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage)

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage)

scrubber {enter 

APCD_ID}

NA (mechanical, non-wood, or 

secondary fiber mill)

99% reduction (by weight) measured 

as total chlorinated HAP

scrubber {enter 

APCD_ID}

NA (mechanical, non-wood, or 

secondary fiber mill)

99% reduction (by weight) measured as 

total chlorinated HAP

Use no chlorine or hypochlorite AND 

meet effluent guidelines/standards

99% reduction (by weight) measured 

as methanol

Use no chlorine or hypochlorite 

AND meet effluent 

guidelines/standards

99% reduction (by weight) measured as 

methanol

Use no chlorine or hypochlorite

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as total chlorinated HAP Use no chlorine or hypochlorite

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as total chlorinated HAP

Meet effluent guidelines/standards

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as methanol Meet effluent guidelines/standards

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv 

measured as methanol

Total outlet mass emission levels for 

all subject stages < 0.002 lb/ton 

ODP

Total outlet mass emission levels for all 

subject stages < 0.002 lb/ton ODP

Bleaching EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 84 of 101
Select yes/no

Each bleaching stage 

includes the tower 

vent, washer hood, 

seal tank vent, 

chemical and steam 

mixers, and vacuum 

pumps Select from list Select from list

Select from list or write in description. Select "NA" if 

ClO2 bleaching is not performed at the mill. Select 

"None" if ClO2 bleaching is performed but no 

measures are employed to reduce CO emissions. 

Otherwise, describe process or control measure used 

to reduce CO emissions.

Bleaching stage 6 

use chlorine or 

chlorinated 

compounds?

Stage 6 control 

method

Stage 6 chlorofrom control 

option(s) used to demonstrate 

subpart S compliance

Stage 6 chlorinated HAP control option used to 

demonstrate subpart S compliance

For mills that use chlorine dioxide (ClO2) 

bleaching, describe any process or control 

measures used to reduce emissions of carbon 

monoxide (CO) from bleaching processes.

None (no CO control measure)

Y/N NA

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated 

compounds used in this stage)

NA (no chlorine or chlorinated compounds used in this 

stage) NA - ClO2 bleaching is not performed

scrubber {enter 

APCD_ID}

NA (mechanical, non-wood, or 

secondary fiber mill)

99% reduction (by weight) measured as total chlorinated 

HAP None (no CO control measure)

Use no chlorine or hypochlorite AND 

meet effluent guidelines/standards 99% reduction (by weight) measured as methanol

Use no chlorine or hypochlorite

Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv measured as total 

chlorinated HAP

Meet effluent guidelines/standards Outlet concentration < 10 ppmv measured as methanol

Total outlet mass emission levels for all subject stages < 

0.002 lb/ton ODP

Bleaching EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 85 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Review Draft

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table Provide data for the 2009 operating year.

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. 

This should match NEI 

Site ID used in other 

tabs.

Complete table for operable paper machines located at any type of mill. 

You may need to specify the same paper machine in multiple rows if the 

machine produces multiple grades of paper at different times (see 

instructions). 

Select paper 

machine 

configuration from 

the menu or write in Select from menu

Survey overview 

reference:

Field: NEI Site ID Paper machine Emission Unit ID

Type of paper 

machine as 

currently 

configured

Is furnish mixture bleached 

or unbleached?

Example entry: 99999 PM1 Fourdrinier bleached

Fourdrinier bleached

cylinder unbleached

twin-wire

mixture of bleached and 

unbleached (please specify)

Paper prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 86 of 101
 you entered in this tab contain CBI? Yes/No

cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Specify the approximate makeup of each paper machine furnish. Indicate the makeup by showing an approximate percentage in decimal form (e.g., enter 0.65 for 65% softwood kraft)

Indicate the other pulp type(s) followed by 

its approximate decimal percentage (e.g., 

softwood semichem - 0.10)

Pulp types used

Hardwood kraft % Softwood kraft % Soda % Sulfite %

Dissolving/ 

specialty pulp %

Semichemical 

pulp %

Hardwood mechanical/ 

groundwood %

Softwood mechanical/ 

groundwood % Secondary fiber % Non-wood fiber % Other % (specify)

0.2 0.65 0.15

Paper prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 87 of 101
Select from menu the most 

closely related paper grade(s) 

produced by the paper 

machine. If multiple paper 

grades are produced on the 

same machine, add the 

additional paper grade(s) in 

separate rows for the paper 

machine.

Enter paper machine 

capacity in air dried 

tons of finished 

paper/day (ADTFP/d)

Specify high density pulp 

storage (stock chest) 

consistency in decimal 

form (e.g., enter 0.15 for 

15%). 

Leave blank for bleached 

pulp.

Select yes/no. If yes, please include an 

explanation.

Leave blank for bleached pulp.

Specify the headbox 

consistency in decimal 

form (e.g., enter 0.001 for 

0.1%)

Enter the numeric value for 

the white water 

recirculation rate in gallons 

per oven dried ton of pulp. 

This is the amount of 

recirculated white water 

added to the pulp stock 

prior to the paper machine 

headbox/wet end.

Provide typical white water 

methanol concentration in 

milligrams per liter (mg/l) if 

it has been measured. 

HAP concentrations at the 

paper machine wet end are 

of interest.

Provide typical white water 

acetaldehyde concentration 

in milligrams per liter (mg/l) 

if it has been measured

Specify HAPs and 

concentrations if known. 

You may provide 

documentation of typical 

white water HAP 

concentrations (if 

measured) as a separate 

attachment to your survey 

response.

Paper machine details

Paper grade produced Capacity, ADTFP/d

For unbleached pulps, 

what is the consistency 

of pulp in high density 

storage (%)?

For unbleached pulps, has the mill taken 

steps (e.g., installed a screw press) to 

raise the consistency of the pulp in high 

density storage in order to reduce 

emissions associated with the fluid in the 

unbleached pulp?

What is the consistency 

of pulp entering the 

paper machine (%)?

White water recirculation 

rate, gal/ODTP

White water methanol 

concentration, mg/l (if 

known)

White water 

acetaldehyde 

concentration, mg/l (if 

known)

White water other HAP 

concentration, mg/l (if 

known)

coated free sheet 935 0.001 48,300 28 UK UK

coated free sheet no

uncoated free sheet yes {please explain}

coated groundwood

uncoated groundwood

tissue & sanitary

specialty packaging & industrial

kraft packaging

linerboard

corrugating medium

solid bleached board

recycled board

construction paper and board

other (specify type)

Paper prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 88 of 101
Enter description. Examples may 

include: measures to reduce 

organics in the pulp stock liquid or 

white water (e.g., use of clean 

condensates in final stage of pulp 

washing); or switching to non-HAP or 

reduced-HAP additives. 

Note Emission Unit ID of stripper if 

used to strip organics from the paper 

machine white water (or pulping 

liquid). Strippers should be included 

in the Equip detail tab. 

Enter the number of vents/stacks on 

the paper machine wet end (e.g., 

forming and press sections, and 

other portions of paper machine prior 

to first dryer) that vent to the 

atmosphere. Count vents ducted 

together prior to release to the 

atmosphere as one vent (e.g., count 

4 vacuum system vents ducted 

together prior to release to the 

atmosphere as one vent stack).

Enter the total exhaust gas flow rate 

from the wet end vents/stacks in 

actual cubic feet per minute (if 

known)

Specify APCD_ID from Controls 

tab, if applicable (e.g., if an APCD is 

used on wet end vent gases).

Enter number of 

dryer steam 

cylinders

Select air dryer firing method from menu or write in.

Air dryers are direct fired or indirect-fired (use steam-toair heat exchangers to produce a hot air stream that is 

forced over the surface of the paper). Hoods are used to 

contain and route the air flow. Air dryers tend to be used 

on lighter weights of paper, such as tissues, and to 

supplement the drying of steam cylinders.

Describe any process 

improvements used to reduce 

HAP emissions from the wet end 

Number of vents/stacks on the 

wet end

Total exhaust gas flow rate from 

the wet end vents/stacks, acfm (if 

known)

Add-on air pollution controls 

used to reduce HAP emissions 

from the wet end (insert 

APCD_IDs)

Number of dryer 

steam cylinders

Indicate firing method and fuel type if air drying is 

used

16 456,000 50 steam-heated (indirect-fired)

steam-heated (indirect-fired)

direct fired (natural gas)

direct-fired {specify fuel}

Paper prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 89 of 101
Enter the number of vents/stacks on the paper 

machine associated with the paper machine dryer(s). 

Count vents ducted together prior to release to the 

atmosphere as one vent (e.g., count 4 dryer system 

vents ducted together prior to release to the 

atmosphere as one vent stack).

Enter the total exhaust gas flow 

rate from the dryer vents/stacks in 

actual cubic feet per minute (if 

known)

Specify APCD_ID from Controls tab 

if applicable (e.g., if an APCD is used 

on dry end vent gases)

Enter the number of vents/stacks on the 

paper machine dry end following the 

dryers (e.g., vents around the 

calendering and winding areas) that vent 

to the atmosphere. Count vents ducted 

together prior to release to the 

atmosphere as one vent.

Enter the total exhaust gas flow rate from 

dry end vents/stacks not associated with 

the paper machine dryer(s) in actual cubic 

feet per minute (if known)

Enter description of any process 

improvements that might reduce HAP 

emissions from the paper machine dry 

end (dryers or other vents/stacks 

following the dryers).

Number of dryer vents/stacks

Total exhaust gas flow rate from 

the dryer vents/stacks, acfm (if 

known)

Add-on air pollution controls used 

to reduce HAP emissions from the 

dryers (insert APCD_IDs)

Number of vents/stacks following the 

dryer

Total exhaust gas flow rate from the 

dryer vents/stacks, acfm (if known)

Describe any process improvements 

used to reduce HAP emissions from 

the dry end 

4 90,000 2 40,000

Paper prod EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 90 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? Yes/No

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Review Draft

Complete the table for any stock preparation and paper machine additives that contain measurable amounts of the following HAP: formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, napthalene, methylene chloride, acrylamide, or benzene.

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table.

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. This should 

match NEI Site ID used in other tabs. Enter Emission Unit ID List additive type

Separate with commas if multiple HAP are 

present (e.g., formaldeyde-5%, acetladehyde2%). Attach additional information to your 

survey resposne if necessary. Enter numeric value Select from list or write in

Survey overview reference:

Field: NEI Site ID Paper machine Emission Unit ID Additive

HAP content (% by volume or ppmv for 

liquids; % by weight or ppmw for solids) Amount used Units for amount

Example entry: 99999 PM1 Wet strength resin Formaldehyde – 5% 8,000 lb/day

gal/day

lb/day

lb/ton paper

HAP additives EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 91 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Review Draft

WWTP = wastewater treatment plant

Provide a flow diagram of each WWTP showing each wastewater handling/treatment unit. [See survey overview section D1]

Use this table to specify any Federal/State/local requirements, permit limits, fenceline monitoring, measurement methods, or modeling methods that apply for measurement or estimation of air emissions (HAP, TRS – including H2S) associated with the WWTP.

Follow instructions in section D3 of the survey overview document to populate this table

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. This should 

match NEI Site ID used in other 

tabs. Specify yes/no. 

Select yes or no.

If yes, submit the most recent 

measurement methods and results as a 

separate file attachment to your survey 

response.

Select yes or no.

If yes, submit the most recent 

measurement methods (e.g., ambient 

measurements) and results as a separate 

file attachment to your survey response.

Survey overview reference:

Field: NEI Site ID

Does the mill have specific permit limits (including 

occupational health limits) related to air pollutants 

from wastewater sources? 

If yes, please specify the limits (and 

applicable units) and explain how 

compliance is demonstrated with these 

limits.

Has fenceline monitoring for air 

emissions (including WWTP air 

emissions) been performed?

Have air emissions associated with 

the WWTP been measured?

Example entry: 99999 yes 

We have OSHA limits for H2S and other 

compounds. See WWTP attachment with our 

survey response for a tabular summary. no no

yes yes yes 

no no no

WW EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 92 of 101
Yes/No

nt for submitting CBI.

Select yes or no.

If yes, submit documentation of the most 

recent modeling as a separate file 

attachment to your survey response.

If no fenceline monitoring, measurements 

(e.g., ambient measurements), or modeling 

of the wastewater treatment system has 

been conducted, please explain how 

wastewater treatment system emissions are 

accounted for in your air operating permit.

Select "NA" from menu if you answered yes 

to one of the previous 3 questions.

Select from menu if air emissions 

associated with wastewater treatment are 

not addressed in your air permit.

Capacity of the wastewater 

treatment plant (million 

gallons per day)

Enter the approximate volume 

percentage (decimal percent) 

of water entering the WWTP 

from each general mill 

location

Have air emissions associated with the 

WWTP been modeled (e.g., with 

WATER9 or another model)? 

Explain how wastewater treatment 

system emissions are accounted for in 

your air permit if you answered "no" to 

the previous 3 questions WWTP capacity, MMgal/day

Approximate volume 

percentage of WWTP 

capacity from kraft 

condensate streams hard 

piped for biological 

treatment in the WWTP (per 

subpart S)

Approximate volume 

percentage of WWTP 

capacity from chemical 

pulping processes (other 

than subpart S hard-piped 

kraft condensates)

Approximate volume percentage of 

WWTP capacity from non-chemical 

pulping processes (e.g., mechanical, 

secondary fiber, or non-wood pulping)

Approximate volume 

percentage of WWTP 

capacity from bleaching 

processes

Approximate volume 

percentage of WWTP 

capacity from papermaking 

processes

Approximate volume 

percentage of WWTP 

capacity from other 

processes or stormwater 

runoff Check (=1)

yes (see separate WWTP attachment with 

modeling input and output) NA 18.5 0.05 0.3 NA 0.2 0.35 0.1 1

yes 

Air emissions associated with wastewater 

treatment are not addressed in the air 

operating permit. 0

no NA

WW EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 93 of 101
Select the general type of WWTP used by 

your mill. Select from menu or write in a 

description. Select from list or write in description Enter short description Select from list or write in description

List the wastewater treatment units in your WWTP 

(separated by commas) in the general sequence in which 

wastewater flows through the units. Include any primary 

and/or secondary clarifiers, oil-water separators, 

equalization basins, neutralization, activated-sludge 

biological treatment units, aerated or non-aerated surface 

impoundments, anaerobic digesters, other biological 

treatment units (trickling filters, rotating biological 

contactors), wastewater storage tanks, and any other 

wastewater treatment units.

Provide a flow diagram showing each wastewater 

handling/treatment unit.

If any wastewater treatment units are equipped 

with a closed vent collection system and air 

pollution control device (APCD), then you should 

also include the wastewater treatment unit in the 

Emission Unit ID column of the Equip detail and 

Control tabs and indicate the APCD information 

in those tabs. 

General type of wastewater treatment 

system

Identify upstream process wastewater 

treatment systems used to reduce 

wastewater treatment unit air emissions of 

nonchlorinated organic HAP and TRS 

(including H2S).

Describe any upstream practices or 

pollution prevention measures that reduce 

wastewater treatment unit air emissions of 

nonchlorinated organic HAP and TRS 

(including H2S).

Describe any upstream practices or pollution 

prevention measures that reduce wastewater 

treatment unit air emissions of chlorinated HAP.

List the wastewater treatment units in your WWTP in 

the general sequence in which they are used 

Identify any wastewater treatment units from 

the list in the previous column that are 

closed systems. Indicate controls if the unit 

is equipped with a closed vent collection 

system and APCD.

Aerated stabilization basin (aerated surface 

impoundment) steam stripper (STRIPPER) Use ClO2 bleaching (instead of chlorine or hypochlorite)

Clarifiers 1-3 (in parallel), aeration basins 1 and 2, 

activated sludge basin, and secondary clarifiers 4-6 (in 

parallel) NA

Aerated stabilization basin (aerated surface 

impoundment) steam stripper (enter Emission Unit ID) Use only nonchlorinated bleaching compounds

Activated-sludge biological treatment biological treatment unit Use ClO2 bleaching (instead of chlorine or hypochlorite)

Packaged system (specify e.g., UNOX system)

wastewater thermal oxidizer (enter Emission 

Unit ID) Other (specify)

Other (specify) Other (specify)

WW EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 94 of 101
Biological treatment system performance data (required for biological treatment systems controlling kraft pulping condensates):

First quarter (Q1) compliance 

determination for 2009

See equation in §63.457(l) of subpart 

S for calculation of "r"

The value of Fbio(MeOH) is used in 

the equations in §63.457(l) of subpart 

S for purposes of determining percent 

reduction or mass removal of total 

HAP in a biological treatment system

Enter the percent reduction of total 

HAP if percent reduction is used to 

demonstrate compliance with subpart 

S. For example, enter "92" for a 92 

percent reduction. Leave blank if the 

precent reduction compliance option 

is not used.

"Total HAP" includes acetaldehyde, 

methanol, MEK, and 

propionaldehyde.

Enter the mass removal of total HAP if 

mass removal is used to demonstrate 

compliance with subpart S. Leave blank if 

the mass removal compliance option is not 

used.

Q1 mass flow rate of methanol 

entering the system (kg/Mg ODP)

Q1 mass flow rate of 

acetaldehyde, MEK, and 

propionaldehyde entering the 

system (kg/Mg ODP)

Mass flow ratio of non-methanol 

total HAP to methanol (value of "r")

Q1 value of Fbio(MeOH) determined 

according to 40 CFR 63 Appendix C

Q1 percent reduction in "total 

HAP" (%)

Q1 mass removal of "total HAP" (kg/Mg 

ODP)

11.5 0.35 0.03 0.97 94

WW EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 95 of 101
Second quarter (Q2) compliance Third quarter (Q3) compliance

Q2 mass flow rate of methanol 

entering the system (kg/Mg ODP)

Q2 value of Fbio(MeOH) 

determined according to 40 CFR 

63 Appendix C

Q2 percent reduction in total HAP 

(calculated using the quarterly 

methanol measurement and value 

of "r" as specified in subpart S), 

%

Q2 mass removal of "total HAP" 

calculated as specified in subpart 

S (kg/Mg ODP)

Q3 mass flow rate of methanol 

entering the system (kg/Mg ODP)

Q3 value of Fbio(MeOH) 

determined according to 40 CFR 

63 Appendix C

Q3 percent reduction in total HAP 

(calculated using the quarterly 

methanol measurement and value 

of "r" as specified in subpart S), 

%

Q3 mass removal of "total HAP" 

calculated as specified in subpart 

S (kg/Mg ODP)

5.9 0.92 5.3 9.8 0.98 95

WW EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 96 of 101
Fourth quarter (Q4) compliance

Q4 mass flow rate of methanol 

entering the system (kg/Mg ODP)

Q4 value of Fbio(MeOH) 

determined according to 40 CFR 

63 Appendix C

Q4 percent reduction in total HAP 

(calculated using the quarterly 

methanol measurement and value 

of "r" as specified in subpart S), 

%

Q4 mass removal of "total HAP" 

calculated as specified in subpart 

S (kg/Mg ODP)

12.3 0.95 92

WW EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 97 of 101
OMB Control No: xxxx-xxxx Do any of the responses (individual cells) you entered in this tab contain CBI? 

Expiration Date: xx/xx/xxxx If yes, be sure to shade the CBI-containing cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the su

Review Draft

Follow instructions in section D4 of the survey overview document to populate this table.

Use this table to identify the specific emission units for which emission test reports are being submitted. EPA will extract the test data from the emission test reports. 

See Attachment 6 of the survey overview document for a list of emissions test reports to be submitted.

Instruction:

Provide for all entries. This should 

match NEI Site ID used in other 

tabs.

Provide for all entries. Line IDs should match those 

used in other tabs such as the Equip detail tab.

Provide for all entries. Emission Unit IDs should 

match those used in other tabs such as the Equip 

detail tab.

Survey overview reference:

Field: NEI Site ID

Line ID (Pulping line ID, Bleaching line ID, or paper 

machine Emission Unit ID) Emission Unit ID(s)

Example entry: 99999 Kraft1 DIG-1, DIG-2, EVAP

99999 Kraft1 LK1

Emissions test data EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 98 of 101
 you entered in this tab contain CBI? Yes/No

 cells red and follow the instructions in section C of the survey overview document for submitting CBI.

Leave columns that do not apply for a given 

emission unit blank.

Specify the collection system if applicable. 

(Examples of collection systems include closed 

vent systems, LVHC, and HVLC systems.) 

Collection system IDs should match those used 

in other tabs such as the Equip detail tab.

Provide the APCD used during the emissions 

test.

APCD_IDs should match those used in other 

tabs such as the Equip detail tab (unless 

equipment configuration has changed).

Enter combustion controls used during the 

emission test (see also the Controls tab)

Use this column for notes or if helpful to specify 

the emission points tested (e.g., for equipment 

with multiple emission points, where only 

selected emission points/vents were tested)

Enter year 

testing was 

conducted (i.e., 

the test date 

year)

Collection system ID(s) APCD_ID(s)

Combustion controls used to reduce air 

pollution (from combustion sources) Process testing notes (optional)

Test report year 

(XXXX)

LVHC-1 LK1/SCBR2 2006

SCBR2 2006

Emissions test data EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 99 of 101
List the pollutants 

tested. Separate 

multiple pollutants by 

commas.

Enter the EPA 

test method 

number (e.g., M5, 

M7E). Be very 

specific if the 

method used was 

not an EPA 

method.

Specify if APCD 

inlet or outlet 

data are provided 

(or both)

This question will be used in 

determining whether the test data 

remain representative of your 

current operations.

Explain any changes in equipment configuration as 

they relate to representativeness of the emissions 

test data supplied.

OPTIONAL: Data regarding frequency 

and cost of testing would help EPA more 

accurately estimate testing costs 

associated with the pulp and paper 

NESHAP and NSPS. OPTIONAL

Pollutants tested

Test method(s) 

used

Are inlet or 

outlet data 

provided?

Has the configuration of the 

emission unit, combustion 

controls, collection system, or 

APCD changed since the test 

was conducted? If yes, please explain

How often are you required to perform 

testing of this emission unit for the 

pollutants listed?

Approximate cost per 

test, $

methanol M308 inlet and outlet no one-time test only 12000

PM M5 outlet no annually 6000

PM outlet yes annually

PM2.5-filterable inlet no every 2 years

PM2.5-cond. inlet and outlet every 5 years

NOx one-time test only

SO2 as requested by the permitting authority

CO

methanol

THC

chlorine

CDD/CDF

POM/PAH

Speciated HAP metals

HCl

TRS

Emissions test data EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 100 of 101
Review of this draft spreadsheet is being requested for general structure and content (e.g., column headings, menu choices, etc). 

Customized spreadsheets containing each mill's NEI data set can be supplied for each mill on a disk or flash drive. 

Brief instructions for each column are provided where needed in an "Instructions" row as well as in a descriptive column heading. More lengthy instructions appear in the survey overview document (as needed).

The final spreadsheet will contain pull down menus (convenient for users, and leading to consistency in the final data base).

Pull down menu text is currently located in the draft tabs for reviewer convenience, but will be moved to its own locked and hidden tab in the final draft (so that it only appears when the cell containing the menu is selected).

Some pull down menus will be limited to the list provided, while others will allow for "write-in" answers (depending on the survey question).

Cells outside the range where data are to be entered can be locked (to prevent data being written in outside cells and eventually getting pulled into Access)

Shading may be used to indicate where data are not to be entered.

Cells formats and print areas will be set in the final version.

QA would be conducted upon receipt of completed spreadsheets from respondents to: 

ensure all non-CBI

check completeness

check mill and equipment coding for consistency

check the data for import issues

etc

Following QA and followup with the mill (if needed), a Macro can be run to replace instruction rows and long column headings with short Access headings

 and to otherwise format the data for import into Access.

This spreadsheet is being set up so that data can be read into Access with a computer program (to be written).

Draft Notes EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-DRAFT-0003.xls 101 of 101