alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2182

SABRINA RENEE BROWN, 

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. 

PANTHER II TRANSPORTATION, INC., Panther Premium Logistics, 

Inc., 

Defendant - Appellee, 

and 

HIRE RIGHT, 

Defendant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:16-cv-00158-RAJ-DEM) 

Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Sabrina Renee Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan K. Meals, DAVEY & 

BROGAN, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Sabrina Renee Brown appeals from the district court’s order 

dismissing her civil action based on improper venue, declining 

to transfer the action to another district, and denying her 

motion to amend. Brown confines her appeal to the district 

court’s dismissal of her action based on improper venue. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in that 

ruling. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Brown v. Panther II Transp., Inc., No. 

2:16-cv-00158-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2016). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# Army, Air Force Team up to Load Helicopters at Shaw AFB

/ Published April 11, 2024

SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C. - U.S. Army and Air Force units worked together to load two U.S. Army AH-64E Apache Guardian helicopters onto a C-5M Super Galaxy aircraft at Shaw Air Force Base March 21-22.

The helicopters assigned to the 1-151st Attack Reconnaissance Battalion, South Carolina Army National Guard, landed at Shaw AFB on the first day and, on the second day, were prepared and loaded onto the Super Galaxy assigned to the 337th Airlift Squadron from Westover Air Reserve Base, Massachusetts.

“Port Dawgs” — 20th Logistics Readiness Squadron air transportation specialists—helped load the aircraft, while other units across Shaw AFB helped ensure mission success. From 20th Operations Support Squadron airfield management to 20th LRS petroleum, oil, and lubricant Airmen who assisted with defueling the aircraft, it was a team effort.

“It’s a special exercise for us, getting a C-5 willing to come meet us out here at Shaw,” said Capt. James Smith, 1-151st ARB B-Company commander. “Getting the equipment, all the personnel and the different external entities to support this training has been integral for us to update our currency, get us recency of training, and — by the end of this — be proficient in this task to then go on and execute well moving forward.”

Once the aircraft were loaded, they were flown to the training area in Florida to participate in a joint forcible entry land and air operations exercise.

“With this movement, we’re really hoping to focus on the logistical piece,” said Smith. “For a lot of training exercises, most of the focus is on live-fire gunnery between armament, maintenance and the aerial effort; the logistical piece is not something we train all the time. Integrating that into this weekend’s exercise is going to buy us a lot of capital going forward.”

The two-day process marked the first time U.S. Army AH-64Es were loaded into a C-5M at Shaw Air Force Base. McEntire Joint National Guard Base, the home of the 1-151st ARB, requested Shaw’s support due to runway renovations occurring at that time.

“One phone call to [Chief Master Sgt. Jennifer Herr, 20th OSS airfield manager] and the puzzle pieces started falling into place,” said Chief Warrant Officer 3 Ross O’Donnell, 1-151st ARB B-Company AH-64E instructor pilot and instrument flight examiner.

Airmen and Soldiers from all three units worked together to load the helicopters as the weather worsened, but even the chilling rain couldn’t dampen the spirit of teamwork.

“Working with sister services like the Army is crucial for operations like this because it enables seamless collaboration and integration of resources, expertise and capabilities,” said Senior Airman Eric Davis, 20th LRS air transportation journeyman. “The collaboration between the Air Force and Army may have presented challenges, but leveraging prior experience and effective communication channels facilitated a smooth process. Any difficulties encountered during the operation served as valuable learning opportunities for future joint operations.”
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6192

MALCOLM MUHAMMAD,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DR. L. TATRO; K. GIVENS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District 

Judge. (7:12-cv-00043-SGW-RSB)

Submitted: May 26, 2013 Decided: May 31, 2013

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, 

PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia; Richard Carson Vorhis, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Muhammad v. Tatro, No. 7:12-cv-00043-SGW-RSB (W.D. Va. 

Jan. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1968]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 174 Under Alternative Site 
Framework, Tucson, Arizona

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of 
zones;
    Whereas, Tucson Regional Economic Opportunities, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 174, has applied to the Board (FTZ Docket B-35-2011, 
docketed 05/23/2011, amended 05/21/2014) for authority to expand FTZ 
174 under the ASF to include additional magnet sites, adjacent to the 
Tucson, Arizona U.S. Customs and Border Protection port of entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (76 FR 30907, 05/27/2011 and 79 FR 31297, 06/02/2014) and the 
application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, in part;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 174 under the ASF is approved as 
it pertains to the Red Rock Industrial Park (designated as Site 8) and 
the Sunshine Industrial Park (designated as Site 9), subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including section 400.13, to the 
Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the zone, and to an 
ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate authority 
for Site 8 and Site 9 if not activated within five years from the month 
of approval.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of April 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-08444 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
AZTAR CORPORATION
                    2390 East Camelback Road, Suite 400
                          Phoenix, Arizona 85016




                             February 25, 1998


Mr. Neil A. Ciarfalia
Treasurer
Aztar Corporation
2390 East Camelback Road, Suite 400
Phoenix, Arizona  85016

Dear Mr. Ciarfalia:

          By letter agreement dated July 6, 1995 (the "Severance
Agreement"), Aztar Corporation (the "Corporation") agreed to provide you
with certain severance benefits in the event your employment with the
Corporation is terminated after a Change in Control by you for Good Reason
or by the Corporation other than for Cause of Disability (as each of such
capitalized terms are defined in the Severance Agreement).  In
consideration of your valuable services to the Corporation and in order to
induce you to continue your employment with the Corporation, the
Corporation and you hereby agree to amend the Severance Agreement by
amending and restating clause (b) of Section 4(iii) of the Severance
Agreement in its entirety, as follows:

               "(b) in lieu of any further salary or other payments to
     you under any agreement for periods subsequent to the Date of
     Termination, the Corporation shall pay as severance pay to you, at the
     time specified in Section 4(v), a lump sum severance payment (together
     with the payments provided in Sections 4(iii)(c) and (d) below, the
     "Severance Payments") equal to 200% of your annual salary as in effect
     as of the Date of Termination or immediately prior to the Change in
     Control, whichever is greater, and 200% of the average of the annual
     bonuses awarded to you pursuant to the Corporation's bonus plan for
     executive officers, or any successor bonus plan thereto, with respect
     to the three (3) fiscal years (or your total years of employment with
     the Corporation, if less than three (3)) preceding the Date of
     Termination;"
          If this letter sets forth our agreement on the subject matter
hereof, kindly sign and return to the Corporation the enclosed copy of this
letter, which shall then constitute our agreement on this subject.


                              Sincerely,

                              AZTAR CORPORATION



                              By PAUL E. RUBELI
                              Paul E. Rubeli
                              Chairman of the Board, President and
                                   Chief Executive Officer


Agreed to this 24th day
of March 1998.

NEIL CIARFALIA
Neil A. Ciarfalia



Address:  Treasurer
          Aztar Corporation
          2390 East Camelback Road, Suite 400
          Phoenix, Arizona  85016
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.44


 


Guarantee Contract


 


Contract No.:SJZ0910720130006-13


 


Pledgor : Hebei Xuhua Trading Co., Ltd.


 


Pledgee : Hua Xia Bank Shijiazhuang Jianhua Branch


 


Signing Date :January 31, 2013


 


Pledge Definition :   To ensure multiple loans Party
B (Pledgee) has lent to Shijie Kaiyuan Auto Trade Co., Ltd.., Party A (Pledgor) is willing to provide the Maximum Guarantee hereunder
for Party B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB150, 000,000


 


Pledge Term : From January 31, 2013 to January 30, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Jerome R Mahoney,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.



                                        Date: November 14, 2005


                                        By /s/ Jerome R Mahoney
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Jerome R Mahoney
                                        President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 3.4 

 

**AMENDMENT TO FIRST AMENDED BYLAWS**

 

**COAST RESORTS, INC.**

 

Article II Section 1 of the First Amended Bylaws of the Company was amended to read as follows: 

 

Section 1. The Board of Directors of the corporation shall consist of atleast three (3) Directors and no more than Thirteen (13) Directors. Subject to the foregoing minimum and maximum, and subject to the rights of the holders of one or more series of Preferred Stock to elect one or more Directors under specifiedcircumstances, the number of Directors shall be subject to determination and change from time to time by duly adopted resolutions of the Board of Directors; provided however, that the total number of Directors, including any Directors to be electedby holders of Preferred Stock under specified circumstances, shall not exceed 13 Directors; further provided that the number of Directors shall at all times be such that at least one-fourth in number shall be elected annually taking intoconsideration the provisions of Article VI of the corporation’s Articles of Incorporation and Section 2 below.
EXHIBIT
23.2




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We have
issued our report dated March 31, 2008, (which report expressed an unqualified
opinion) accompanying the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2007 which is  included in the Annual Report of New
Motion, Inc. (dba Atrinsic, Inc.) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in Registration Statement No. 333-145933 on Form S-8 of
New Motion, Inc.




/s/
Windes & McClaughry Accountancy Corporation




Irvine,
California




March 26,
2008
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Sonic Innovations, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Samuel L. Westover, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael
M. Halloran, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ SAMUEL L. WESTOVERSamuel L. WestoverPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2008/s/ MICHAEL M. HALLORANMichael M. HalloranVice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2008


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Best, Aleta (OST) i^iiW W 

From: Best. Aleta (OST) . '•.'ij' I'.V-'V.' • 

Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 12:25 PM ' • - -^ - • • ^ 

To: "Faberman, Edward P.'; 'Skowron, Katrina' 

Cc: Remo, Laura (OST); Walker, Damon (OST) : j[\: ,; r 0|2:3 Q 

Subject: Request for additional information: Twin Cities Air Service, LLC -- Docket DOTOST-2011-0032 

Good afternoon, Ed, 

As you know, by Order 2011-7-5 in Docket DOT-OST-2011-0032, the Department tentatively found Twin Cities 

Air Service, LLC ("Twin Cities") fit, willing, and able to provide scheduled passenger operations as a commuter air 

carrier, subject to conditions. 

On July 19, 2011, Twin Cities made its final submission for its application for commuter authority and indicated 

that two of the three key personnel identified in the initial application would be replaced. The resumes for 

these new personnel, Jamey D. Gauthier and David Carter, were included in Exhibit F-4. Our review of this 

information reveals some significant deficiencies. Mr. Gauthler's resume does not identify his positions / job 

titles with Twin Cities or with his previous employers (Nichols Portland and L.L. Bean). In addition, Mr. 

Gauthler's resume does not include his FAA license and/or certification number(s) and does not specify his flight 

time by aircraft type(s). Mr. Carter's resume does not include his FAA license and/or certification number(s). 

Finally, no information has been provided regarding Mr. Gauthler's or Mr. Carter's citizenship. 

Given the above noted deficiencies we do not find that Twin Cities has complied with the requirements of 2010-

7-5 to make its authority effective. Therefore, so that we may continue our review of the air carrier's fitness to 

operate its proposed commuter operations, we ask that you respond to the attached information request within 

30daysoftheof the date of this email. In addition, please remember that Twin Cities should promptly provide 

the Department with any information regarding changes it may undergo in areas affecting its fitness {i.e., 

management, operating plans or financial condition, compliance disposition, or ownership) while its application 

is under review by the Department. 

Sincerely, 

Aleta 

INFORMATION REQUEST 

TWIN CITIES AIR SERVICE, LLC 

1. Please provide a complete resume for (a) Mr. Jamey D. Gauthier and (b) Mr. David Carter. Each resume 

should include the individual's full name, citizenship, current address, and telephone numbers, together 

with a detailed listing of all previous employment (both aviation and non-aviation) and education and 

training, including FAA certifications and license numbers if applicable. The employment listing should 

include the name of employer, location (city, state), type of business, position(s) held, description of 

responsibilities, and dates employed. Further, if the employer held any aviation authority, the type of 

authority held should be noted. 

2. Please accompany your response to this request with the certification required by Title 18 United States 

Code Section 1001. 
Jlkta (Best 

Office of Aviation Analysis (W86-498) 

S Phone; 202-493-0797
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 57930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22947]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Intent To Conduct a Detailed Economic Impact Analysis

AGENCY: Policy and Planning Division, Export-Import Bank of the United 
States.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import 
Bank of the United States is withdrawing a previous Federal Register 
notice informing the public of its intent to conduct a detailed 
economic impact analysis regarding a loan guarantee to support the 
export of U.S.-manufactured Boeing 777 and Boeing 737 passenger 
aircraft to an airline in China. Based on new information not available 
at the time the original Federal Register notice was posted on July 23, 
2014, the evaluated transaction does not meet the substantial injury 
threshold and is therefore not subject to a detailed economic impact 
analysis.

DATES: The Federal Register notice published on July 23, 2014 at 79 FR 
42791 is withdrawn as of September 26, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Interested parties may submit comments 
on this transaction by email to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 
811 Vermont Avenue NW., attention Policy and Planning Division, 
Washington, DC 20571.

James C. Cruse,
Senior Vice President, Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 2014-22947 Filed 9-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7235

WILBERT DONNELL QUICK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WAKE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY/MEDICAL; DOCTOR

UMESI; DONNIE HARRISON, Sheriff,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,

District Judge. (5:05-ct-00755-D)

Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 3, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbert Donnell Quick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Wilbert Donnell Quick appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Quick v.

Wake County Detention Facility, No. 5:05-CT-00755-D (E.D.N.C. Apr.

11 & June 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" and the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 2, 2005, which appears
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Pyramid Breweries Inc. and
subsidiary, in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-16311, No.
333-57128, No. 333-91290, No. 333-117574 and No. 333-121182).

/s/ Moss Adams LLP


Seattle, Washington
March 31, 2005
EXHIBIT 10.1





EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





September 23, 2002





Dr. David C. Collins


Learning Tree International, Inc.





Dear Dr. Collins:





This will confirm our agreement to extend,
until September 30, 2004, the term of your Employment Agreement dated as of October 1, 1995. All of the other terms of the Employment Agreement will remain as they have been.





Very truly yours,





Learning Tree International, Inc.





By

/s/    MARY C. ADAMSMary C. Adams, Vice President, Administration





Accepted and Agreed:





By

/s/    DAVID C. COLLINSDavid C. Collins





Dated

September 24, 2002