alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3641 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the military housing 

allowance exclusion for purposes of determining area gross income in 

determining whether a residential rental property is a qualified residential 

rental property for purposes of the exempt facility bond rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 

Mr. NYE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the military housing allowance exclusion for purposes 

of determining area gross income in determining whether 

a residential rental property is a qualified residential 

rental property for purposes of the exempt facility bond 

rules. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Families Af5 fordable Homes Act’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3641 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF HOUSING ALLOWANCE EXCLUSION 

2 FOR DETERMINING AREA MEDIAN GROSS IN3 COME FOR QUALIFIED RESIDENTIAL RENTAL 

4 PROJECT EXEMPT FACILITY BONDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

6 142(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in clause (iii)(I) by striking ‘‘qualified mili9 tary installation to which’’ and all that follows 

10 through ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘quali11 fied military installation or facility’’, and 

12 (2) by striking clause (iv). 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 this section shall apply to determinations of the status of 

15 qualified residential rental projects for periods beginning 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act, with respect 

17 to bonds issued before, on, or after such date. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
___________

No. 95-3756

___________

Ming Shan Lin, also known as *

Allen Lin, *

*

 Petitioner, *

*

v. * Petition for Review from the

* United States Immigration and

Immigration and Naturalization * Naturalization Service.

Service; Dean A. Hove, Acting *

District Director, U.S.I.N.S.; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Janet Reno, Attorney General of *

the United States of America, *

*

 Respondents. *

___________

 Submitted: July 26, 1996

 Filed: August 12, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Ming Shan Lin seeks review of a final order of the Board

of Immigration Appeals affirming a deportation order issued in the

immigration court. The Board denied petitioner's application for asylum

and withholding of deportation. We conclude that substantial evidence

supports the Board's decision. Accordingly, the decision of the Board is

affirmed and the petition for review is dismissed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Readiness center ceremony marks National Guard's 370th birthday

/ Published Dec. 14, 2006

ARLINGTON, Va. - About 200 people gathered in the atrium of the Army National Guard Readiness Center Dec. 13 to mark the 370th anniversary of the National Guard.

Before the birthday cake could be cut, though, Lt. Gen. Clyde Vaughn, director of the Army Guard, presented Gene McDaniel, a supervisor in the IT department, a pin for 50 years of federal service, and he praised the crowd for exceeding the readiness center’s Combined Federal Campaign goal of $170,000 by $30,000.

Standing on a podium with red and white poinsettias at his feet and flanked by a 20-foot Christmas tree on his left, Vaughn captured the significance of the day.

“We’re an institution within an institution that we’re older than,” he said, underscoring the fact that the Army National Guard is considerably older than the U.S. Army that was formed in 1775.

Vaughn talked about the origin of the Guard in 1636 when the Massachusetts Bay Colony General Court ordered existing militia companies from the towns surrounding Boston to be formed into three regiments. He then talked about the Revolutionary War, explaining that the militia units “brought the entire populace into the fight.”

“It’s up to us to keep this organization as strong as possible,” said Vaughn in a tone that may have made the 15-foot statue of the Concord Minuteman, beside the readiness center’s entrance, clench his musket more firmly. “You’re what’s right about the United States,” the director added.

He led everyone in the “Army Song,” and then *rolled along* into the cake cutting, performed in Army fashion with a sword.

In his benediction, Chaplain (Lt. Col.) Larry Jones remembered the Guard Soldiers who were serving thousands of miles away, on the front lines of the Global War on Terrorism. Jones asked for special grace for those in difficult and dangerous places.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,552,534
<SECURITIES>                                 1,506,150
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,324,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,678,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,370,463
<PP&E>                                       1,840,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                 430,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,924,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,823,757
<BONDS>                                        617,854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,755
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,101,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,924,940
<SALES>                                      7,465,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,465,447
<CGS>                                        5,964,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,964,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,745,890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (251,029)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,993,642)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,993,642)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,993,642)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.81)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

In accordance with title 41 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), notice is hereby given that the Charter for the Frederick National Advisory Committee to the National Cancer Institute was renewed for an additional two-year period on March 30, 2015.

It is determined that the Frederick National Advisory Committee to the National Cancer Institute, is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the National Cancer Institute and the National Institutes of Health by law, and that these duties can best be performed through the advice and counsel of this group.

                    Inquiries may be directed to Jennifer Spaeth, Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Mail code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or                     *spaethj@od.nih.gov*.                

Dated: April 1, 2015.

Melanie J. Gray,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-07861 Filed 4-6-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE CODE 4140-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 10.15
 TWELFTH AMENDMENT TO THE
DYNEGY INC. 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN
    I.
  (1)
Account(s)
 II.
   III.
  (28)
Eligible Retirement Plan




---



##### 



402(c)(11)
 IV.
  (53) Roth Account: Section
4.3.
 (54) Roth Contributions:
 V.
  (55) Service. , ,
  2




---



##### 



VI.
  (68)
Class Settlement Account I In re
Dynegy Inc. ERISA Litigation,
  3




---



##### 



Age of Member or Former MemberFund Name
    

on April 1, 2005Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund
    
    Ages 65 or olderVanguard Target Retirement 2005 Fund
    
    Ages 60 to 64Vanguard Target Retirement 2015 Fund
    
    Ages 50 to 59Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund
    
    Ages 40 to 49Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund
    
    Ages 30 to 39Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund
    
    Up to Age 29
  4




---



##### 



VII.
  (68B) Class Settlement Account II: In re Dynegy Inc. Securities
Litigation,
   5




---



##### 



Fund Name
    
    Age of Member or Former MemberVanguard Target Retirement Income Fund
    
    Ages 65 or olderVanguard Target Retirement 2005 Fund
    
    Ages 60 to 64Vanguard Target Retirement 2015 Fund
    
    Ages 50 to 59Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund
    
    Ages 40 to 49Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund
    
    Ages 30 to 39Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund
    
    Up to Age 29
 VIII.
   IX.
    6




---



##### 



X.
   XI.
   XII.
  3.12 Roth Contributions.
 XIII.
    7




---



##### 



XIV.
   XV.
   XVI.
    DYNEGY INC.,a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Julius CoxTitle:
    
    Chairman, Dynegy Benefit Plans CommitteeDate:
    
    December 4, 2007
  8
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

SHAUN ROBERTS, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-15016 

D.C. Nos. 4:13-cv-05529-JSW 

4:05-cr-00567-JSW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 27, 2018**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Shaun Roberts appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and 

we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 5 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-15016 

Roberts contends that his armed bank robbery conviction under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 2113(a), (d) does not qualify as a predicate crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 924(c). This argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Watson, 881 F.3d 782 

(9th Cir.), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 203 (2018).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of slabsdirect.com, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the  quarter  ending  September  30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  date  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)   The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


August 25, 2004                    By: /s/ Steven Bruk
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Steven Bruk
                                       President, Principal Executive
                                       Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
                                       Principal Accounting Officer
| | MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.
337 Magna Drive
Aurora, Ontario
Canada L4G 7K1
tel: 905-726-7100
fax: 905-726-7164  
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | DECOMA INTERNATIONAL INC.
50 Casmir Court
Concord, Ontario
Canada L4K 4J5
tel: 905-669-2888
fax: 905-669-5075

JOINT PRESS RELEASE
DECOMA PRIVATIZATION COMPLETED

March 7, 2005

Decoma, designs, engineers and manufactures automotive exterior components and systems which include fascias (bumpers), front and rear end modules, liftgates and running boards, plastic body panels, exterior trim components, sealing and greenhouse systems and lighting components for cars and light trucks (including sport utility vehicles and mini-vans).  Decoma has approximately 16,000 employees in 54 manufacturing, engineering and product development facilities in Canada, the United States, Mexico, Germany, Belgium, England, France, Austria, Poland, the Czech Republic and Japan.

Magna, the most diversified automotive supplier in the world, designs, develops and manufactures automotive systems, assemblies, modules and components, and engineers and assembles complete vehicles, primarily for sale to original equipment manufacturers of cars and light trucks in North America, Europe, Mexico, South America and Asia. Magna's products include: automotive interior and closure components, systems and modules through Intier Automotive Inc.; metal body systems, components, assemblies and modules through Cosma International; exterior and interior mirror and engineered glass systems through Magna Donnelly; fascias, front and rear end modules, plastic body panels, exterior trim components and systems, greenhouse and sealing systems and lighting components through Decoma International Inc.; various engine, transmission and fueling systems and components through Decoma International Inc.; a variety of drivetrain components through Magna Drivetrain; and complete vehicle engineering and assembly through Magna Steyr.  Magna has approximately 81,000 employees in 219 manufacturing operations and 49 product development and engineering centres in 22 countries.

For further information regarding this press release, please contact at Magna: Vincent J. Galifi, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, at (905) 726-7100, and at Decoma:  S. Randall Smallbone, Executive Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer at (905) 669-2888.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 99.5

                          KEY AUTO FINANCE TRUST 1999-1
                        OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICER

To:    Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware, as Owner Trustee
       Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee
       Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
       Standard & Poor's Ratings Group
       Fitch Investors Service, L.P.

         Pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as
of March 24, 1999 among Key Auto Finance Trust 1999-1, as Issuer, Key Consumer
Acceptance Corporation, as Seller, Key Bank USA, National Association, as
Servicer and Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee (the "Agreement"), the
undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of Servicer
from the Closing Date (March 24, 1999) through December 31, 1999, and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's
supervision and (ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based
on such review, Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations in all material
respects under the Agreement throughout such period.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate this 22nd day of
March, 2000.

                                   KEY BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
                                   as Servicer

                                   By: /S/ Craig T. Platt
                                      -------------------------
                                      Craig T. Platt
                                      Senior Vice President



                                    Page 22
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STEVEN R. HANEY, §

§ No. 575, 2015

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, §

§ Court Below:

v. §

§ Superior Court of the

BANK OF AMERICA, § State of Delaware

§

§ C. A. No. S14L-10-029

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: May 4, 2016

Decided: May 5, 2016

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND and VALIHURA, Justices.

O R D E R

This 5th day of May 2016, the Court, having considered this matter on the briefs of 

the parties, has concluded that the same should be affirmed on the basis of and for the 

reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its decision of October 16, 2015.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

 Justice
#### THE STATE, ex rel., SPAULDING, &c., &c., *vs.*GEO. GALE, Circuit Judge, &c.

Chapter 61 oí session laws of 1858 abrogates rules 12 and 21 of the circuit court in regard to the time within which a bill of exceptions may be settled.

By chapter 61 of the session laws of 1858, the excepting party on the trial, has until the next ensuing regular term of the circuit court to settle his bill of exceptions; the late rules in relation thereto being abrogated, and the former rules being restored thereby.

Application for mandamus to compel the respondent to sign a bill of exceptions. An alternative writ was issued to which the respondent made return, the material facts of which are set forth in the opinion of the court To this return the relator demurred.

*Knapp*& *Dennison,*for the relator.

*The Respondent,*p. p.

*By the Court,*

Cole, J.

The demurrer in this case must be sustained. The material facts set up by the respondent in his answer to the alternative writ of mandamus are, that the judgment was entered on the 18th of September, 1858; that on the 22d of October following, a copy of the bill of exceptions was served upon the attorneys of the opposite party, with notice that the bill would be presented to the circuit judge on the 27th of November thereafter, to be settled and signed; that the bill was actually presented to him on the 9th of December, when the attorneys objected to the judge signing the bill on the ground that the bill had not been prepared *694and served in compliance with circuit court rules Nos. 12 and 21. It appearing to the respondent that these rules had not been complied with, he refused to settle and sign the bill.

In view of the rules, we think the respondent decided properly. The bill was not prepared and served in conformity to them, and did they control the case, the demurrer would have to be overruled. But by chapter 61 session laws 1858, it is provided that in all cases tried by a jury in any of the circuit courts of the state where exceptions are or may be taken to the ruling or decision of the judge before whom the case is heard, the excepting party may take the same to the supreme court by writ of error in the manner formerly in use on bill of exceptions, which may be prepared and settled according to the former rules and practice of the court. By the former rules, the party had until the next ensuing regular term to have his bill of exceptions settled and sealed. As chapter 61, above referred to, abrogates the present rules in force in regard to the settlement of the bill of exceptions the excepting party now has until the next ensuing regular term to have the exceptions settled and sealed in accordance with the old circuit court rule No. 70.

The demurrer is therefore sustained, and a peremptory writ of mandamus awarded.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc., (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                 
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------
|Dated: March 28, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JON A.
DELUCA            
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer         
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 28, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    CHARLES S. WIESENHART
JR.
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: Chuck French [French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 6:09 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Ann Johnson; Hancy, Cindy Wang; Erin Newman; Fred Talcott; Jan Tierney; Kelly 

Rimer; Mark Morris; Phil Mulrine; Marinshaw, Richard; Robin Langdon; Sara Ayres; 

Steve Fruh; Tim Benner; Tom Walton

Subject: RE: EO 13563 Interagency Comments on Chromium RTR

Attachments: E O 12866 CromiumElectroplatingSteelPickling 2060-AQ60P Promulgation-8-14-2012-

clean-550pm.docx

Hi Cortney, 

Attached is a slightly revised clean preamble/rule which incorporates a few small remaining edits that we 

discussed. 

Let me know if you have questions. 

Thanks. 

Chuck French 

Phone: 919-541-7912 

(See attached file: E O 12866 CromiumElectroplatingSteelPickling 2060-AQ60P Promulgation-8-

14-2012-clean-550pm.docx)