alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3178 

To express the sense of Congress on interoperability with Taiwan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2021 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To express the sense of Congress on interoperability with 

Taiwan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON INTEROPERABILITY 

4 WITH TAIWAN. 

5 It is the sense of Congress that, consistent with the 

6 Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 

7 et seq.) and the Six Assurances, the United States should 

8 seek to support the goals of— 

9 (1) improving asymmetric defense capabilities 

10 of Taiwan; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3178 IS

1 (2) bolstering deterrence to preserve peace, se2 curity, and stability across the Taiwan Strait; and 

3 (3) deepening interoperability with Taiwan in 

4 defense capabilities, including in— 

5 (A) maritime and air domain awareness; 

6 and 

7 (B) integrated air and missile defense sys8 tems. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F. Fisbeck, Principal Financial Officer (acting) of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:  April 14, 2009


By:  /s/ John F. Fisbeck


John F. Fisbeck


Principal Financial Officer (acting)
EXHIBIT 23.2



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement
on Form  S-8  pertaining  to the  1989  Long-Term  Incentive  Plan  and the 1995
Incentive Plan for  Non-Management  Employees of  Tanknology-NDE  International,
Inc.,  of our report  dated March 13,  1998,  with  respect to the  consolidated
financial statements of Tanknology-NDE International,  Inc. included in its Form
10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  1997,  filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.



                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG, L.L.P.
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             ERNST & YOUNG, L.L.P.



Austin, Texas
October 8, 1998


                                      - 1 -
Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 

13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF1934 

AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Patrick J. Kealy, Chief Executive Officer and President of Star Energy Corporation (the“Company”), certify that: 

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company; 

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.      The Company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

         a.      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared; 

         b.      Evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

         c.      Disclosed in this report any change in theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (in the case of an annual report, the fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5.      The Company’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

         a.      All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

         b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.75

FIRST AMENDMENT OF PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT OF MSOAN DIVRE II OF
2005 PHASE-2 IN DIVRE II NO.K.TEL.252/HK.820/TCC-00/2005 DATED 30 DECEMBER 2005


The Parties:            1.    TELKOM; and

                        2.    ZTE -- TEMASINDO Consortium.

Preceding Agreement:    Procurement and Installation Agreement of MSOAN DIVRE II
                        of 2005 Phase-2 in DIVRE II No. K.TEL.
                        197/HK-810/TCC-00/2005, dated 6 October 2005.

Amended Provisions:     1.    The parties have agreed to amend the provisions
                              concerning additional works;

                        2.    The parties have agreed to immediately complete
                              the discussion on work completion period
                              extension;

                        3.    The parties have agreed to amend the agreement
                              price.
Opinion issued April 1 8 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00261
- CV

——————————— IN RE THOMAS FLORENC E , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Thomas Florence, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus , challenging the trial court’s January 16, 2013 order dismissing his case for want of prosecution. 1

1 The underl y ing case is In the Matter of the Marriage of: Thomas Wayne Florence and Wanette Marie Florence , No. 12

- Fd

- 2877, in the County Court at Law No. 3 of Galveston County, Texas, the Honorable Christopher Dupoy presiding.2 Standard of Review Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, which is available only when (1) a trial court clearly abuses its discretion and (2) there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); In re Unitec Elevator Servs. Co ., 178 S.W.3d 53, 57 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, orig. proceeding). In his sole issue, relator complains that the tria l court abused its discretion in dismissing his case for want of prosecution. Generally , mandamus wil l issue to direct a trial court to rescind an order only when a relator has no other adequate remedy. Downs v. Trevathan , 783 S.W.2d 689, 690 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1989, orig. proceeding ) (denying motion for leave to file petition for writ of mand amus). It is the r elator’ s burden to show that he ha s no ad equate remedy available at law. See In re Prudential , 148 S.W.3d at 135

– 36. Relator has not shown that he has no adequate remedy on appeal

. See Downs , 783 S.W.2d at 690

. Conclusion
We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.
Gross Per Unit Heat Input Heat Input Power Output Output Unit (MMBtu/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (MW) (lb/hr) (tons/hr) (lb/hr) (tons/hr) (lb/hr) (tons/hr) (lb/hr) (tons/hr) (lb/MWh) (7FA.05) LHV HHV 100% Load, 59 F, 60% Relative Humidity (ISO), Natural Gas-Firing, CT Only 

### CT1 1,923 2,135 218 118.9 253,796 126.9 2.20E-04 0.5 0.0002 2.2E-03 4.7 0.0024 

### 254,040 127 CT2 1,923 2,135 218 118.9 253,796 126.9 2.20E-04 0.5 0.0002 2.2E-03 4.7 0.0024 

### 254,040 127

3,846 4,269 435.8 507,591 253.8 1 0.0005 9 0.005 

### 508,081 254 1,166 Design Margin 

### 5% Performance Degradation Margin 

### 3% 1,261

100 % Load, ISO, Oil-Firing, CT Only 

### CT1 2,117 2,265 223 162.3 367,640 183.8 1.32E-03 3.0 0.0015 6.6E-03 15.0 0.0075 

### 368,883 184 CT2 2,117 2,265 223 162.3 367,640 183.8 1.32E-03 3.0 0.0015 6.6E-03 15.0 0.0075 

### 368,883 184

4,234 4,530 445.3 735,281 367.6 6 0.0030 30 0.015 

### 737,767 369 1,657 Design Margin 

### 5% Performance Degradation Margin 

### 3% 1,792

Annual Operating Scenario No. 1 Annual Average Case Baseload, 59 F, 3390 Hours per Year of Natural Gas Firing and Zero Hours per Year of Oil Firing. (Short TPY) (lb/MWh) 

### CT1 430,598 1,261 CT2 430,598 1,261 Total (2 CTs) 861,196 Annual Operating Scenario No. 2 Annual Average Case Baseload, 59 F, 2890 Hours per Year of Natural Gas Firing and 500 Hours per Year of Oil Firing. (Short TPY) (lb/MWh) 

### CT1 459,309 1,339 CT2 459,309 1,339 Total (2 CTs) 918,618 Annual Operating Scenario No. 3 Annual Average Case Baseload, 59 F, 1640 Hours per Year of Natural Gas Firing and 750 Hours per Year of Oil Firing. (Short TPY) (lb/MWh) 

### CT1 Total (1 CT) 346,644 1,434 

### CT Maximum Annual Emissions (Scenario No. 2) 918,618 Short TPY Emergency Generator 398 Short TPY Fuel Gas Heater 5,123 Short TPY Total Annual CO2e Emissions (Incudes Startup and Shutdown Emissions)(e) 

### 924,139 Short TPY PSD Review Threshold 75,000 Short TPY

(a) Appendix G - Determination of CO2Emissions, 40 CFR Part 75. Natural gas-firing CO 2lb/MMBtu = 1040 scf/MMBtu(HHV) x (1/385) scf CO 2/lb-mole x 44 lb/lb-mole = 118.9 lb/MMBtu. Appendix G - Determination of CO2Emissions, 40 CFR Part 75. Oil-firing CO 2lb/MMBtu = 1420 scf/MMBtu(HHV) x (1/385) scf CO2/lb-mole x 44 lb/lb-mole = 162.3 lb/MMBtu. (b) Table C-2, Subpart C, 40 CFR Part 98. Emission factors in kg/MMBtu were converted to lb/MMBtu by multiplying by 2.204. (c ) CO2e = CO2 + (21 x CH4) + (310 x N2O) (d) Assumes 5% margin for design basis and 3% margin for degradation between major overhauls and the life of unit. (e) TPY CO2e conservatively based on 100 % utilization at maximum load at an annual average operating case based on ISO conditions, 100% load @ 59 deg. F, 60 % relative humidity. Source: Golder, 2012. Revised 4/1/13. Adjusted lb/MWh for Margin (d) CO2e Emissions (c) Emission Emission Emission Factor Emission Rate Factor Emission Rate Factor Emission Rate Emission Rate (lb/MMBtu) (lb/MMBtu) (lb/MMBtu)

Adjusted lb/MWh for Margin (d) 

### TABLE 1. GHG Emissions for the Proposed Shady Hills Expansion Project Compared to PSD Review Threshod

CO2Emissions (a) N2O Emissions (b) CH4Emissions (b)
Filed 11/19/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2008 ND 207

Stephen Peterson, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

DS Dispatch, Inc., Defendant and Appellant

No. 20080165

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Christopher M. Kennelly, Kennelly & O’Keeffe, Ltd., 109 Roberts St., Box 2105, Fargo, ND 58107-2105, for plaintiff and appellee.  Submitted on brief.

Timothy P. Hill, Hill Law Office, PLLC, 1351 Page Dr., Ste. 202, P.O. Box 9043, Fargo, ND 58106-9043, for defendant and appellant.  Submitted on brief.

Peterson v. DS Dispatch, Inc.

No. 20080165

Per Curiam.

[¶1]DS Dispatch, Inc., appeals from a judgment granting Stephen Peterson’s motion for summary judgment and a district court order denying DS Dispatch, Inc.’s motion to vacate judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b).  DS Dispatch, Inc., argues the district court erred by ordering a 30-day redemption period and by denying DS Dispatch, Inc.’s motion to vacate the judgment.  Peterson argues DS Dispatch, Inc., violated N.D.R.App.P. 30(a)(1) by inserting items into the appendix that are not in the record.  Peterson also asserts he should be granted attorney fees for this appeal, because the appeal is frivolous under N.D.R.App.P. 38.

[¶2]The district court did not abuse its discretion by ordering a 30-day redemption period.  See Straub v. Lessman, 403 N.W.2d 5, 7 (N.D. 1987) (determining the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering a two-month redemption period).  The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying DS Dispatch, Inc.’s N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion.  See State v. $33,000.00 United States Currency, 2008 ND 96, ¶ 14, 748 N.W.2d 420 (quoting Royal Indus., Inc. v. Haugen, 409 N.W.2d 636, 638 (N.D. 1987) (“A simple disregard of legal process is, of course, not excusable neglect under [N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)].”).

[¶3]DS Dispatch, Inc., included documents in its appendix that were not in the record.  Rule 30(a), N.D.R.App.P., provides in part:  “Only items in the record may be included in the appendix.”  This Court may take appropriate action against any person failing to perform an act required by rule.  N.D.R.App.P. 13.  Because DS Dispatch, Inc., did not comply with N.D.R.App.P. 30(a), we award double costs to the appellee.  Estate of Wieland, 1998 ND 130, ¶ 22 n.3, 581 N.W.2d 140.  This appeal is not flagrantly groundless or devoid of merit; therefore, it is not frivolous and we decline to award attorney fees.  See Lucas v. Porter, 2008 ND 160, ¶ 28, 755 N.W.2d 88 (citing Witzke v. City of Bismarck, 2006 ND 160, ¶ 19, 718 N.W.2d 586); N.D.R.App.P. 38.

[¶4]We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶5]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ending January 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Jean Perotti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:  Date: March 15, 2006             /s/ Jean Perotti
                                         -----------------------
                                         Name:  Jean Perotti
                                         Title: Interim Chief Financial Officer
                                         And Principle Accounting Officer
# Illinois Air Guard Supports Partner Poland

/ Published April 10, 2024

POWIDZ, Poland - The 126th Air Refueling Wing completed a two-week deployment to Poland in support of Operation Copper Arrow.

The operation enhanced combat readiness among NATO allies and partner nations, enabling them to respond to any threat rapidly. Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve aerial refueling tankers, KC-135s, KC-10s and KC-46s, supported Copper Arrow on a two-week rotational basis.

“The Copper Arrow mission has been highly successful,” said Lt. Col. Spencer Leidel, the 108th Air Refueling Squadron commander, “fulfilling all of the required objectives for United States Air Forces in Europe, European Command and the eastern European theater.”

The wing also provided much-needed nighttime aerial refueling training for the Polish Air Force, Illinois’ partner in the Department of Defense National Guard Bureau State Partnership Program. 

“It becomes a team effort between both the boom operator and the receiver pilot to coordinate, make sure that they’re in the proper position for optimal refueling,” Leidel said.

On the ground, members of the 126th met with their Polish counterparts to discuss further ways to expand their partnership.

“Talking to our logistics readiness squadron commander, our civil engineer commander, as well as our aircraft maintenance squadron commander, we’ve identified specific opportunities,” said Maj. Mike McCarthy, maintenance squadron commander. “We can either do some annual training or bring a deployment for training here.”

The deployment had some challenges. A part broke on one of the two planes. After some searching, a spare part was found at Royal Air Force Mildenhall, England, and installed a few days later.

“It was a very good team effort,” McCarthy said. “Yesterday afternoon for a few hours it was all hands on deck. We had every maintainer that was here on this trip out there. Definitely a lot of coordination and a lot of hard work that went in from a lot of different agencies to make that happen.”

McCarthy said the Illinois Air National Guard looks forward to continuing to strengthen its relationship with Poland.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00004

- CV

James H. Hite, Jimbeth Hite and WANOP, LLC v. John Ackers and Susan Ackers

On a ppeal from the 197th District Court of Willacy County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2016

- CV

- 0337

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion

. Costs of the appeal are taxed against a ppellant s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 2, 2017
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1053

KELVIN J. HURDLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusCOMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-00-336) Submitted: June 29, 2001 Decided: July 16, 2001 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Kelvin J. Hurdle, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kelvin J. Hurdle seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment against him on his Title VII claims. See 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We havereviewed the record, the district court’s opinion, and the materials submitted by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hurdle v. Virginia , No. CA-00-336 (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 2001). We deny Hurdle’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# South Dakota National Guard combat lifesavers train in South America

/ Published Dec. 10, 2012

PARAMARIBO, Suriname - The South Dakota National Guard sent three service members to South America on a medical training exchange with service members from South Dakota's partner nation, Suriname.

Lt. Col. Larry Debuhr, medical administrative officer with the South Dakota Air National Guard's 114th Medical Group and South Dakota Army National Guard's Sgt. 1st Class Kelley Crane, combat lifesaver and emergency medical technician, and Staff Sgt. Justin Schiferl, Medical Command readiness noncommissioned officer, conducted combat medical training Nov. 23-25 in Paramaribo with Suriname medics and Soldiers.

South Dakota's service members focused their training on advanced life support, which included self-aid and buddy care, wound care, splinting, shock, airway management, IV application and transport.

"It helped raise awareness of what types of medical treatments are available and potentially introduced them to new first aid techniques," Debuhr said.

Suriname's medical personnel trained National Guard members on treatment using limited and natural resources, which included ‘bush' medical training and techniques used in the jungle environments throughout Suriname.

"You have to adapt to your surroundings and make the best of what you have to work with," Debuhr said.

"They do what they can and work with what they have to make things happen."

"It forced us to step out of our comfort zone and experience different things," Crane said. "Our procedures are more advanced, only because we have access to more training and equipment. Even though it's more difficult for Suriname to get the equipment, it seems as though they excel at survival-type training."

The exchange also emphasized the importance of training on a wide spectrum of topics to include medical maladies that are no longer a concern in the U.S.

"There are many things that are medical concerns in other countries that have been eliminated in the U.S.," Schiferl said. "These items could easily be overlooked or misdiagnosed if they are not considered. By participating in this mission, I was reminded of the importance of a wide scope of operations."

Guard members concluded the exchange by traveling four hours west, to Nickerie, Suriname, where they worked with their counterparts providing medical oversight during National Day ceremonies.

"We were very well-received and feel that our work was appreciated," Debuhr said. "We take for granted in this country too many of the simple amenities. We should be thankful for what we have."