19072 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 

1For a full description of the scope of the order, 

see the memorandum from Gary Taverman, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary Enforcement 

& Compliance, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary 

for Enforcement & Compliance, ‘‘Decision 

Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland’’ 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is 

dated concurrently with this notice, and is hereby 

incorporated by reference. A list of the topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum appears in Appendix I of this notice. 

2See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

3See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

4See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

5See 19 CFR 351.303. 

6See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.216 and 

351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: April 1, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of the Order 

Discussion of the Issues 

1. The Time Period Examined 

2. Whether the Department Should 

Distinguish Between Incremental vs. 

Rapid Changes 

3. Changes to the Four Factors Considered 

in Successor-in-Interest Determinations 

Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–08222 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–405–803] 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From 

Finland; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

Ashland Specialty Ingredients, a 

division of Hercules Inc., (Petitioner), 

and CP Kelco Oy (CP Kelco), the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on purified 

carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from 

Finland. The period of review (POR) is 

July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. The 

review covers one respondent, CP 

Kelco. We preliminarily find that sales 

of the subject merchandise by CP Kelco 

have not been made at prices below 

normal value (NV) during the POR. We 

invite interested parties to comment on 

these preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 9, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is all purified CMC, sometimes also 

referred to as purified sodium CMC, 

polyanionic cellulose, or cellulose gum, 

which is a white to off-white, non-toxic, 

odorless, biodegradable powder, 

comprising sodium CMC that has been 

refined and purified to a minimum 

assay of 90 percent. The merchandise 

subject to the order is classified in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States at subheading 

3912.31.00.1

Methodology 

The Department is conducting this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Export price and 

constructed export price are calculated 

in accordance with section 772 of the 

Act. NV is calculated in accordance 

with section 773 of the Act. For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Internet at 

http://www.enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

The signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine the following 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 

2014. 

Exporter/manufacturer Margin 

(percent) 

CP Kelco Oy ................................. 0.00 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

The Department intends to disclose to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

preliminary results within five days of 

the date of publication of this notice.2

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit cases 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed no later 

than five days after the date for filing 

case briefs.3 Parties who submit case 

briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of authorities.4

Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed 

using ACCESS.5 An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by ACCESS, by 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the date the document 

is due. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

the Departments electronic records 

system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern 

Time within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.6 Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. Issues raised in 

the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case briefs. If a 

request for a hearing is made, parties 

will be notified of the date and time for 

the hearing to be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230. 

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of the issues raised in any 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 19073 

7See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

8For a full discussion of this clarification, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

9See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, 

Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden, 70 FR 39734 

(July 11, 2005). 

1A/k/a Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga Stationery 

Company, Ltd., and Beijing Dixon Stationery 

Company. 

2See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of Initiation and 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 80 FR 10457 (February 26, 

2015) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying 

memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Order on 

Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of 

China: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review Requested by the Dixon 

Ticonderoga Companies’’ dated February 18, 2015 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

3See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased 

Pencils from the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 

66909 (December 28, 1994) (Order). 

4See Certain Cased Pencils From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Determination To 

Revoke Order In Part; 2010–2011, 78 FR 42932 (July 

18, 2013) (Revocation) and accompanying issues 

and decision memorandum (IDM). 

written briefs, within 120 days after the 

date of publication of this notice, unless 

extended, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, the Department 

shall determine and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. If CP Kelco’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis in 

the final results of this review, we will 

calculate an importer-specific 

assessment rate on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of antidumping 

duties calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales and the total entered 

value of such sales in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If CP Kelco’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of review, or an importer-specific rate is 

zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to dumping margins.7

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003.8 This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by CP Kelco 

for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States. In such instances, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction. 

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 15 days after publication of the 

final results of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication as provided 

by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for CP Kelco Oy will 

be the rate established in the final 

results of this administrative review 

except if the rate is de minimis within 

the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for merchandise exported by 

manufacturers or exporters not covered 

in this review but covered in a prior 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recent period in which the 

manufacturer or exporter participated; 

(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

in this review, a prior review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value 

investigation but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 6.65 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.9 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 2, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of The Order 

Methodology 

Fair Value Comparisons 

Product Comparisons 

Determination of Comparison Margins 

Results of Differential Pricing Analysis 

Date of Sale 

U.S. Price 

Export Price 

Constructed Export Price 

U.S. Sample Sales 

Normal Value 

Home Market Viability as Comparison 

Market 

Calculation of NV Based On Comparison 

Market Prices 

Home Market Sample Sales 

Cost of Production Analysis 

Level of Trade Analysis 

CEP Offset 

Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Constructed Value 

Currency Conversion 

Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2015–08210 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–827] 

Certain Cased Pencils From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On February 26, 2015, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the notice of 

initiation and the preliminary results of 

the changed circumstances review 

(CCR) of the antidumping duty order on 

certain cased pencils (pencils) from the 

People’s Republic of China (PRC), in 

which the Department preliminarily 

determined that Beijing FILA Dixon 

Stationery Co., Ltd.1 (Beijing Dixon), as 

currently structured under its new 

business license, is the successor-ininterest to Beijing Dixon.2 For these 

final results, the Department continues 

to find that Beijing Dixon is the 

successor-in-interest to Beijing Dixon as 

that entity existed at the time the 

Department revoked the order 3 with 

respect to Beijing Dixon.4 Accordingly, 

the Revocation of the antidumping duty 

Order with respect to Beijing Dixon 

continues to apply to Beijing Dixon as 

currenly structured. 

DATES: Effective: April 9, 2015. 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES