alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MILES COMSTOCK and LEWIS COMSTOCK, Plaintiffs in Error. *vs.*HENRY A. SCALES, Defendant in Error.

ERROR TO THE ROCK CIRCUIT COURT.

A chattel mortgage can only operate upon propeity in actual existence at the time of its execution.

A chattel mortgage can have no valid operation upon a crop of grain given at; or about the time of planting the same, and before it is up or has any appearance of a growing crop.

The property attempted to be mortgaged in such case, cannot be said to be in existence; the subject matter not being *in esse*there is nothing for it to operate upon.

Action of trover for *the*conversion of a certain crop of grain. The property ivas claimed under a chattel mortgage executed by one Hatch, lessee of one of the defendants below, to the plaintiff, upon the oats, wheat and corn (the property in dispute), at or about the time the same were planted, and before the same was up or presented the appearance of growing grain. Hatch had leased the premises on shares of one of the defendants, but before the expiration of the lease, and before the ripening of said crops, abandoned the premises and absconded. In the fall the plaintiff, the mortgagee of Hatch, went on to the premises to harvest the crops, but was forbidden and prevented by the defendant, who afterwards harvested the crops. They also claimed the interest of Hatch in the property by virtue of a purchase under an execution against said Hatch. The above is a sufficient statement of the facts of the case. The instructions of the judge to the jury, which raises the question of law determined, is stated in the opinion of the court.

*160Several points were made by counsel, but the only one considered by the court will appear.

*Noggle*4’ *Cummings,*for the plaintiffs in error.

*John R. Bennett,*for the defendant in error.

*By the Court,*

Cole J.

The defendant in error claimed the grain in controversy, by virtue of a chattel mortgage, given upon it, about the time the grain was sowed and planted, and before the same was up or presented the appearance of growing grain, and the circuit court instructed the jury upon this point, that as soon as the grain was sown, Hatch, the tenant, could mortgage his half of the crop, and that the same would be held by the mortgage. This instruction we consider erroneous. In our opinion a chattel mortgage can only operate upon property in actual existence at the time of execution, and cannot be given, as was attempted to be done in this case, upon a crop before it can be said to be in existence. Since the subject matter of the chattel mortgage was not *in esse*at the time the mortgage was executed, there was nothing for it to operate upon. This doctrine seems to be settled by the following authorities: *The Bank of Lansingburg vs. Crary et al.*1 Barb. S. C. R. *542. Otis vs. Sill,*8 id. 102, and the cases cited and commented upon by Justice Paige in these decisions. As this question disposes of this case and involves the necessity of a new trial, we do not feel called upon to notice the other points upon the briefs of counsel.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and a new trial ordered.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T MAY 18, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 10 15 3

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 2 :1 0- cr-0 00 36 -CEH-DNF-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pl ai nt iff - App el le e,
vers us DARRYL LAMAR POWE LL, a.k .a. Darrel l Po well , ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt- App el la nt
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Ma y 18 , 20 12 ) Befo re WILSON, ANDERSON, andHIGGINBOTHAM,* Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ *Honora ble Patrick E. Hig g inbotham, United States Circuit J udg e for the Fif th Circuit, sitti ngby designation.Darryl Lam ar Po well ap pe al s h is co nv ic ti on an d s en te nc e fo r po ss es si on of

a fi rearm an d a m m un it io n b y

a co nv ic te d fe lo n, i n v io la ti on of 1 8 U.S.C. § § 92 2( g) an d 9 24 (e). Th e Co urt h as co ns id eredall of P owe ll ’s sp eci fic at io ns of
erro r, in cl ud in g: (1 ) whe th er two o f Po well ’s pri orst at e co nv ic ti on s, wh ic h s erv e as th e b as is fo r hi s Arm edCare er Cr im in al Act (AC CA) en ha nc em en t, were “ co m m it te d o n
oc cas io ns di ffer en t fr om

on e an ot he r,” as requi redby 18 U.S.C. § 92 4( e); (2 ) whe th er a jury

m us t d et erm in e b ey on d areas on ab le do ub t t he fact s
un de rlyin g t he ACCA’s st atut ory requi rem en ts , sp eci fic al ly, whe th er t he pri or cri m es were co m

m it te d o n d iff

eren t o ccas io ns ; (3 ) whe th er the di st ric t co urt i m pr op erl y ad m it te d e vi de nc e p ur su an t t o F ed
. R. Evi d. 4 04 (b ), an d fa il edto gra nta m is tri al ; (4 ) whe th er p art s o f th e g ov ern m en t’s cl os in g s ta te m en t p ro vi de d g ro un ds fo r a m is tri al ; (5 ) whe th er the effe ct s o f th e tr ia l erro rs cu m ul at iv el y de ni edPo well a fai r tri al ; (6 ) whe th er the jury in st ru ct io ns co ns tru ct iv el y am en de d t he in di ct m en t; (7 ) whe th er the ev id en ce was su ffi ci en t t o s up po rt t he co nv ic ti on s; (8 ) whe th er the in fo rm at io n t ha t s up pl ie d p ro babl e cau se to sea rch Po well ’s
2res id en ce was st al e; an d

(9 ) whe th er 1 8 U.S.C. § 92 2( g) is a co ns ti tu ti on al ex erci se of C on gr es s’s
au th or it y un de r th e Co m

m erce Claus e. Afte r rev ie w andco ns id erat io n o f th e b rie fs an d t he reco rd , andha vi ng th e be ne fitof o ral arg um en t, we fi ndno ha rm fu l erro r in th e p ro ceed in gs in th e d is tri ct
co ur t. The refo re, t he de ci si on of t he di st ric t co ur t i s AFFIRMED.

3
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 28425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12176]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday June 24, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and enforcement matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-12176 Filed 5-13-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
CHH 10.02 - AMEND - WU




Amendment to
Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation & Severance Benefit Agreement


This Amendment, dated this 25th day of March 2013, amends that certain Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation & Severance Benefit Agreement (“Agreement”) entered into on February 13, 2012 between Choice Hotels International, Inc. (“Choice”), a Delaware corporation with principal offices at 10750 Columbia Pike, Silver Spring, Maryland 20901, and Simone Wu (“Employee”).


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to the following terms:


1.  Section 6 is amended by adding to the end thereof:
The Release Agreement must be irrevocably effective within sixty (60) days following the Termination Date. Subject to the six (6) month delay referenced in Section 9(f), the payments shall begin or be made on the sixtieth day following the Termination Date.
2. Section 8(b) is amended by adding to the end thereof:
The Release Agreement must be irrevocably effective within sixty (60) days following the Termination Date. Subject to the six (6) month delay referenced in Section 9(f), the payments shall begin or be made on the sixtieth day following the Termination Date.
3.  Choice’s notification address in Section 10 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“Choice Hotels International, Inc.
One Choice Hotels Circle                
Rockville, Maryland 20850”


3.  All other provisions of the Agreement not affected by this Amendment remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first set forth above.
	
			
	CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	 
	Employee

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Patrick Cimerola
	 
	/s/ Simone Wu

	Patrick Cimerola
	 
	Simone Wu
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.s 333-114164,
333-105318, 333-105317, 333-101320, 333-100763, 333-43574, 333-57782, 333-79573, 333-79553, 333-56905, 333-39747 and 333-28725) and on Form S-3 (No.s 333-79659, 333-58659, 333-48513, 333-66120, 333-19601 and 333-67546) of Advent Software, Inc.
of our report dated April 8, 2005, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP       
|San Jose, California             
|April 8, 2005
JAZZ Q1 2013 EX 10.6




Exhibit 10.6
2013 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements 




	
			
	Executive Officer
	Base Salary  
Rate(1)
	Target Bonus as % of Annual Base Salary Rate(2)

	 
	 
	 

	Bruce C. Cozadd 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	$775,000
	100

	 
	 
	 

	Kathryn E. Falberg
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	$475,000
	50

	 
	 
	 

	Russell J. Cox
Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer
	$425,000
	50

	 
	 
	 

	Suzanne Sawochka Hooper
Executive Vice President and General Counsel 
	$475,000
	50

	 
	 
	 

	Fintan Keegan
Executive Vice President, Technical Operations
	€270,000
	50

	 
	 
	 

	Jeffrey K. Tobias, M.D.
Executive Vice President, Research and Development and Chief Medical Officer
	$425,000
	50

	 
	 
	 

	Karen J. Wilson
Senior Vice President, Finance and Principal Accounting Officer
	$285,000
	40

	 
	 
	 






		
	(1)
	Base salary rate effective beginning by March 1, 2013.


		
	(2)
	Target bonus percentage for each officer is based on his or her position and/or responsibility level as provided in Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc’s cash bonus plans.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

Nos. 11-2767, 11-4032 & 13-1084

________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RICHARD CORBIN

a/k/a ASHEED

a/k/a SHEED

a/k/a RICHARD RASHEED CORBIN

Richard Corbin,

Appellant (Nos. 11-2767 & 13-1084)

________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOHNNIE CORLEY,

a/k/a 

BLACK,

a/k/a

C,

a/k/a 

CURLEY

Johnnie Corley,

Appellant (No. 11-4032)

________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Criminal Action Nos. 2-10-cr-00352-002/003)

District Judge: Honorable Michael M. Baylson

________________
2

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

November 18, 2014

Before: AMBRO, SCIRICA, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed April 21, 2015)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the Not Precedential Opinion in the above case filed 

April 21, 2015, be amended as follows:

On page 8, footnote 2, starting twelfth line down, each time the name “Corbin” 

appears, replace it with “Corley” so that the text will read:

“. . . jeopardy; (9) Corley’s challenges to the grand jury proceedings; (10); Corley’s 

argument that the trial proceedings caused a variance; (11) Corley’s claims relating to the 

Government’s introduction of evidence regarding his cell phone usage at or near the time 

of the robberies; and (12) Corley’s attack on the jury instructions.” 

By the Court,

s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: February 4, 2016
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the this annual report of Cash Technologies, Inc.
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending May 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Bruce Korman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Edmund King, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectfully, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: September
13, 2003



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|/s/    BRUCE
KORMAN     |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer |  |
**Exhibit 10.19**

**WESTELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

**SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION**

**(Effective May 5, 2010)**

The annual retainer for all non-employee directors is $40,000. Annual retainers for committee chairpersons are as follows: Chair of theAudit Committee - $10,000; and Chair of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee - $10,000. Annual retainers for the members of committees are as follows: Member of the Audit Committee - $5,000; and Member of the Compensation andCorporate Governance Committee - $5,000. There is not separate compensation for meeting attendance. In addition, all directors may be reimbursed for certain expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings. Directorswho are employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for service as directors. In addition, non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. On a director’s initial appointment date,non-employee directors are each granted 20,000 restricted shares, with 25% vesting on each annual anniversary date of the grant. On April 1 of each year, another 10,000 restricted shares shall be granted to each non-employee director with 25%vesting on each annual anniversary of their respective grant dates.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08228]



[[Page 19308]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ15-11-000]


Orlando Utilities Commission; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on March 27, 2015, Orlando Utilities Commission 
submitted its tariff filing per 35.28(e): Order No. 1000 Interregional 
Further Regional Compliance Filings, to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a2c2f382925040603040f391f1a1a05181e2a0c0f1809440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b0d0e190804252722252e183e3b3b24393f0b2d2e3928652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 14, 2015.

    Dated: April 3, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08228 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 99



Press Release
-------------

From:  Shelbourne Properties III, Inc.

New York, New York - August 14, 2001 - Shelbourne Properties III, Inc.
(AMEX:HXF), a real estate investment trust, announced today that Messrs. W.
Edward Scheetz and David T. Hamamoto, directors of the Company, have been
appointed as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company and of its external
adviser, Shelbourne Management LLC, in replacement of Mr. Michael L. Ashner, who
resigned effective August 15, 2001. Mr. Ashner is the Chief Executive Officer of
Kestrel Management, L.P., the entity that, together with its affiliates, will
continue to perform administrative and property management services for the
Company.


                                       21
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19981-19982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1946-010; ER10-3310-008; ER10-3286-008; ER10-
3299-007; ER13-1485-004; ER10-3253-004; ER14-1777-003; ER10-3237-004; 
ER10-3240-004; ER10-3230-004; ER10-3231-003; ER10-3232-002; ER10-3233-
003; ER10-3239-004.
    Applicants: Broad River Energy LLC, New Harquahala Generating 
Company, LLC, Millennium Power Partners, L.P., New Athens Generating 
Company, LLC, Wheelabrator Baltimore, L.P., Wheelabrator Bridgeport, 
L.P., Wheelabrator Falls Inc., Wheelabrator Frackville Energy Company 
Inc., Wheelabrator North Andover Inc., Wheelabrator Portsmouth Inc., 
Wheelabrator Ridge Energy Inc., Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company 
Inc., Wheelabrator South Broward Inc., Wheelabrator Westchester, L.P.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of the ECP-Affiliated MBR 
Sellers.
    Filed Date: 4/8/15.
    Accession Number: 20150408-5162.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/29/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1475-000.
    Applicants: North Star Solar, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing per 35.12 Application for Initial 
Market-Based Rate Tariff and Granting Certain Waivers to be effective 
4/9/201.
    Filed Date: 4/8/15.
    Accession Number: 20150408-5142.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/29/15.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date.

[[Page 19982]]

Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a 
party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 8, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08516 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI:No

P-10-0224

Standard Review Draft 4/26/2010

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi/Avcin \ CLM

PV (kg/yr): Import only 

Revision Notes/Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: LABEL: No

Gen Eqpt: 

Respirator:

Health Effects:

TLV/PEL: 

CRSS: (3/1/2010):

Chemical Name: 

S-H2O: 1 g/L @ 

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ 

MW: 0.0%<500 0.0%<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Neat: Mfg: NK: Imported

Proc/Form: End Use:

.

Consumer Use:

SAT (concerns): (3/2/2010):

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Other (please specify)

PBT rating: P3 B1 T2 Anion: P3B1T2 // Cation: P1B1T1

Health: 2, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 1, No releases to Water
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claims: 

P2 REC:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No (0 criteria met)
P-10-0224

Use:

Number of Sites/Location:

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources 

to the same medium.
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Inhalation: