alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3654 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3654

To authorize the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to procure, launch, and 
     operate the next generation of weather forecasting satellites.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2009

  Mr. Klein of Florida (for himself and Mr. Melancon) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science and 
                               Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to procure, launch, and 
     operate the next generation of weather forecasting satellites.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hurricane Satellite Modernization 
Act''.

SEC. 2. XOVWM CONSTELLATION.

    (a) Role of NASA.--
            (1) In general.--The Administrator of NASA is authorized to 
        procure and launch the next-generation Extended Ocean Vector 
        Winds Mission, or XOVWM, constellation of satellites.
            (2) Coordination.--The Administrator of NASA shall 
        coordinate with NOAA to ensure that the capabilities of the 
        XOVWM constellation of satellites will meet the operational 
        data needs of NOAA.
            (3) Plan.--The Administrator of NASA shall develop a plan 
        and schedule for the procurement and launch of the XOVWM 
        constellation of satellites and shall submit such plan to the 
        Committee on Science and Technology of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
        Transportation of the Senate.
    (b) Role of NOAA.--The Administrator of NOAA is authorized to 
operate the constellation of satellites procured under subsection 
(a)(1).
    (c) Annual Report.--The Administrator of NASA and the Administrator 
of NOAA shall submit to Congress an annual report about each agency's 
progress in conducting the activities authorized by this section.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) NASA.--The term ``NASA'' means the National Aeronautics 
        and Space Administration.
            (2) NOAA.--The term ``NOAA'' means the National Oceanic and 
        Atmospheric Administration.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator of NASA 
and the Administrator of NOAA a total of $3,000,000,000 for fiscal 
years 2010 through 2027 for the purpose of carrying out section 2.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-126772) as amended, and in the relatedProspectus, and the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-36779, 333-43159, and 333-43181) on Form S-8, of our reports dated August 20, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of SPACEHAB, Incorporated, included inthis Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2005. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

 

September 19, 2005
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 360 

To authorize the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard 

is operating to issue a certificate of documentation for operation in 

the coastwise trade for the vessel ZIPPER. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Mr. MCHUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the department in which the 

Coast Guard is operating to issue a certificate of documentation for operation in the coastwise trade for the 

vessel ZIPPER. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VESSEL ZIPPER. 

4 Notwithstanding sections 55101, 55103, and 12112 

5 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of the de6 partment in which the Coast Guard is operating may issue 

7 a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorseVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:52 Jan 12, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H360.IH H360

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 360 IH

1 ment for the vessel ZIPPER (State of New York registra2 tion number NY3205EB). 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Airspan Networks, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Stonestrom, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ERIC STONESTROM                               
|Eric StonestromChief Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2003



A signed original of this
statements required by Section 906 has been provided to Airspan Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Airspan Networks, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1











The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. These certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.














Certification of Chief Executive Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:





(i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Tarang P. AminTarang P. AminChief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
















Certification of Chief Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:





(i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Joseph W. BatyJoseph W. BatyChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement as required by Section 906 has been provided to Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and will be retained by Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Back to 10K
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 16, 2022

No. 04-17-00310-CV

YATES ENERGY CORPORATION, EOG Resources, Inc., Jalapeno Corporation, ACG3 

Mineral Interests, Ltd., Glassell Non-Operated Interests, Ltd., and Curry Glassell,

Appellants

v.

BROADWAY NATIONAL BANK, Trustee of the Mary Frances Evers Trust,

Appellees

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015PC2618

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The parties’ motions for rehearing are currently due on August 18, 2022. On August 15, 

2022, the parties filed a joint motion to extend the deadline for filing motions for rehearing until 

September 16, 2022. After consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER the parties to file 

their motions for rehearing, if any, by September 16, 2022.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of August, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
[KCAP Financial letterhead]


 


April 22, 2013


 


Mr. Dayl Pearson


KCAP Financial, Inc.


295 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor


New York, NY 10017


 


Dear Dayl:


 


This letter constitutes an amendment to
your employment agreement with Kohlberg Capital Corporation, now known as KCAP Financial, Inc., dated June 27, 2012 (the “Employment
Agreement”), pursuant to Section 11(a) of the Employment Agreement. Except as specifically stated herein, the terms and conditions
described in your Employment Agreement will remain in effect.


 


Effective as of the date first written above,
Section 4(c) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence thereof.


 


If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please
sign this letter in the space provided and return it to me. We will provide a countersigned copy for your records.


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ Edward U. Gilpin
	 	 
	 	Edward U. Gilpin
	 	Chief Financial Officer


 


 


Accepted by:


 


/s/ Dayl W. Pearson


 



Dayl W. Pearson


 


Date: April 22, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 LASERLOCK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 of LaserLock Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Norman Gardner, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d)); and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 ****Date: November 12, 2004
By:
/s/ Norman GardnerNorman GardnerPresident and CEO(Principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
 
 Explanatory Note:
The same individual serves as Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and principal financial officer. Accordingly, there are no other individuals who are other certifying officers referred to in this certification.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARIEL RAMON ARAUZ; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-72937

Agency Nos. A096-356-298

A096-356-299

A096-356-300

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2010** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Ariel Ramon Arauz and his family, natives and citizens of Nicaragua,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissal of an appeal

from an immigration judge’s order denying their request for asylum and

withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

FEB 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 06-72937

review for substantial evidence, Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir. 2000),

and we grant the petition for review, and remand.

The agency found the harm Arauz alleged did not rise to the level of

persecution. This finding is not supported by substantial evidence because

Sandinistas kidnaped Arauz, invaded his family home several times, harassed his

family repeatedly, and closely confronted him with death threats. See Ruano v.

Ashcroft, 301 F.3d 1155, 1160-61 (9th Cir. 2002) (concluding that threats,

accompanied by some form of confrontation or mistreatment, established past

persecution).

The agency also found Arauz did not establish a nexus between the

Sandinistas’ actions against him and a protected ground. Substantial evidence does

not support the agency’s finding that there was no nexus between the Sandinistas’

actions and a protected ground. See Navas v. INS, 217 F.3d 646, 656 (9th Cir.

2000) (applicant may establish eligibility for asylum relief by showing persecution

on account of a protected category).

Accordingly, we grant the petition for review and remand for further

proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12,

16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
*Present*— Judges Rutmdge, Hutson, and Síatsewí.

#### Dinckle and wife *vs.*Timrod and others.

DECEMBER, 1784.

CASH *II.*

"Nh, took,

?ürlítion of jand, and sale of land,

Bill and answers read with exhibits, whereupon ordered that the country lands be divided by commissioners, or any of them, into five equal parts or shares, for the benefit of the children ef Michael Muckenfuss, and the representatives of Ms son Andrew: and that the lands in Charleston he sold by the master after six weeks public notice on a credit of two years, (subject to the claim, of Catharine Friend) o» inte, rcct, ana security to be approved by the master, for the benefit of the complainant, asid the other children ‘of the eaid Michael Muckenfuss.*

*

 If will be seen by this case, that the partidon of real estates, Is within the jurisdiction of the court of equity in South Carolina. And the power o : ordering sales, where a division cannot be made advantageously, or where the land is unproductive to the children, is of very great importance in a country where landed property is held by almost every man, and is transferred from hand to hand, with the facility of personal estate; and which is very frequently uncultivated, and unproductive of any immediate revenue, though of increasing value:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle. WA 98101-3140
OFFICE OF 

### FEB 1 9 

### mJ ECOSYSTEMS, TRIBAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS Mr. Kim Kratz Director, Oregon State Habitat Office National Marine Fisheries Service 1201 NE Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97232-1274
Re: Designation ofan Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site at the Siuslaw River Entrance Request for Species List in Project Area for Endangered Species, Essential Fish Habitat and Marine Mammals
Dear Mr. Kratz: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is in the process of designating an ocean dredged material disposal site offshore ofthe mouth ofthe Siuslaw River, Oregon, under Section 102 ofthe Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA). The purpose ofthis letter is to request the assistance ofyour agency to help us meet the requirements ofthe Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA)and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) for this disposal site designation. The United States Army Corps ofEngineers (USACE), Portland District, has been using an existing Suislaw River Entrance site as a selected site under Section 103 ofthe MPRSA since 1999. The authority to continue using the site under Section 103 expires at the end ofthe 2009 dredging season and cannot berenewed. EPA must designate a site pursuant to Section 102 of the MPRSA to use the same location for the disposal ofdredged material. EPA intends to prepare additional environmental documentation for this site designation. The Section 102 designation will allow for the continued disposal ofdredged material at the Suislaw River Entrance, Oregon. Werequest a written list ofendangeredandlorthreatened species, essential fish habitat and marine mammals that maybepresent in the project area. For purposes ofthis action, pleaseuse the Zone ofSiting Feasibility as delineated in the enclosed figure as a reference figure for the project area. Thepreferred ocean dredged material disposal site for designation is expected to be located in the vicinity displayed onthe enclosed figure.EPA is presently coordinating with the USACE, Portland District, to prepare supporting environmental documents for EPA's action to designate the site, including information relevant to the ESA, MSA and MMPA. Ifyou have questions or need additional information, please contact our project leader, Jessica Winkler at (206) 553-7369, orbyemail at winkler.jessica@epa.gov. Sincerely,

Richard B. Parkin, Acting Director Office ofEcosystems, Tribal and Public Affairs Enclosure



# oPrinffldon RflCyclfldPtIp«I 

# r 

# SIUSLAW RIVER Ocean 

# Dredged Material Disposal Site**---~** 

# andZSF 

# • n

LEGEND YARDS 

# filii DISPOSAL SITE,INTERIM 1000 

# !!!**~li~SAL** SITE,ADJUSTED

o I
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **1797**

CHUKWUJINDU VICTOR MBAKPUO , Petitioner

– Appellant,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , Attorney General of the United States; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , Respondent s .

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : March 4 , 2011 Decided: March 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition d ismissed by un published per cur iam opinion

. Liam Ge, Columbia, Maryland , for Petitioner

. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Assistant Director, Francis W. Fraser , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent s . Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chukwujindu Victor Mbakpuo, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal fro m the immigration judge’s order s denying his application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) (2006), the application for voluntary departure and his motion to reconsider. We d ismiss the petition for review. In an appeal of an administr ative decision to grant or deny cancellation of removal und er 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229b(b), this

c ourt has jurisdiction only over constitutional claims and questions of law. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (D) ( 2006 ); see Jean v. Gonzales , 435 F.3d 475, 479

- 80 (4th Cir. 2006) (holding that, under § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (D), c ourt has no jurisdiction over any aspects of denial of relief under § 1229b except constitutional claims or questions of law); Obioha v. Gonzales , 431 F.3d 400, 405 (4th Cir. 2005) (“It is quite cl ear that the gatekeeper provision bars our jurisdiction to review a decision of the B[oard] to actually deny a petition for cancellation of removal or the other enumerated forms of discretionary relief.”). Mbakpuo’s application was denied as a matter of d iscretion and because he failed to show his removal would be an exceptional and extreme hardship to his United States born children. We conclude that Mbakpuo has failed to identify any3 substantive error of law or constitutional claim regarding the discret ionary denial of relief. Thus, we do not have jurisdiction to review the order. With regard to voluntary departure, this c ourt does not have jurisdiction to review the denial of an order for voluntary departure, except for claims involving a constitut ional error or an error of law. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1229c(f)(2006); Ngarurih v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 182, 193 (4th Cir. 2004). Mbakpuo has failed to identify any such error. Therefore, we dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument beca use the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION D ISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2964 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2964

 To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 
 National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 2021

  Ms. Baldwin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 
 National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Scenic Trails Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(8)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting ``as a unit 
of the National Park System'' before the period at the end.

SEC. 3. ICE AGE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(10) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(10)) is amended by striking the third and fourth sentences and 
inserting ``The trail shall be administered by the Secretary of the 
Interior as a unit of the National Park System.''.

SEC. 4. NEW ENGLAND NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(28) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(28)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting ``as a unit 
of the National Park System,'' after ``administer the trail''.
                                 <all>
```