19352 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 69 / Friday, April 10, 2015 / Notices 

Estimated Reporting and 

Recordkeeping Non-Hour Cost Burden: 

We have identified seven non-hour cost 

burdens, all of which are the cost 

recovery fees required under 30 CFR 

250, Subpart J. However, the actual fee 

amounts are specified in 30 CFR 

250.125, which provides a consolidated 

table of all of the fees required under the 

30 CFR 250 regulations. The total of the 

non-hour cost burden (cost recovery 

fees) in this IC request is an estimated 

$1,508,968. 

The non-hour cost burdens required 

in 30 CFR 250, Subpart J (and respective 

cost-recovery fee amount per 

transaction) are required under: 

§ 250.1000(b)—New Pipeline 

Application (lease term)—$3,541, 

§ 250.1000(b)—Pipeline Application 

Modification (lease term)—$2,056, 

§ 250.1000(b)—Pipeline Application 

Modification (ROW)—$4,169, 

§ 250.1008(e)—Pipeline Repair 

Notification—$388, § 250.1015(a)— 

Pipeline ROW Grant Application— 

$2,771, § 250.1015(a)—Pipeline 

Conversion from Lease Term to ROW— 

$236, § 250.1018(b)—Pipeline ROW 

Assignment—$201. 

We have not identified any other nonhour cost burdens associated with this 

collection of information. 

Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA 

(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. Until OMB approves a 

collection of information, you are not 

obligated to respond. 

Comments: Before submitting an ICR 

to OMB, PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A) 

requires each agency ‘‘. . . to provide 

notice . . . and otherwise consult with 

members of the public and affected 

agencies concerning each proposed 

collection of information . . .’’. 

Agencies must specifically solicit 

comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the 

collection is necessary or useful; (b) 

evaluate the accuracy of the burden of 

the proposed collection of information; 

(c) enhance the quality, usefulness, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) minimize the burden 

on the respondents, including the use of 

technology. 

Agencies must also estimate the nonhour paperwork cost burdens to 

respondents or recordkeepers resulting 

from the collection of information. 

Therefore, if you have other than hour 

burden costs to generate, maintain, and 

disclose this information, you should 

comment and provide your total capital 

and startup cost components or annual 

operation, maintenance, and purchase 

of service components. For further 

information on this burden, refer to 5 

CFR 1320.3(b)(1) and (2), or contact the 

Bureau representative listed previously 

in this notice. 

We will summarize written responses 

to this notice and address them in our 

submission for OMB approval. As a 

result of your comments, we will make 

any necessary adjustments to the burden 

in our submission to OMB. 

Public Comment Procedures: Before 

including your address, phone number, 

email address, or other personal 

identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Douglas W. Morris, 

Chief, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08264 Filed 4–9–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Safety and Environmental 

Enforcement 

[Docket ID BSEE–2015–0004; OMB Control 

Number 1014–0008; 15XE1700DX 

EEEE500000 EX1SF0000.DAQ000] 

Information Collection Activities: Well 

Control and Production Safety 

Training; Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request 

ACTION: 60-day notice. 

SUMMARY: To comply with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), BSEE is inviting comments on a 

collection of information that we will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for review and approval. 

The information collection request (ICR) 

concerns a renewal to the paperwork 

requirements in the regulations under 

Subpart O, Well Control and Production 

Safety Training. 

DATES: You must submit comments by 

June 9, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by either of the following methods listed 

below. 

• Electronically go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, 

enter BSEE–2015–0004 then click 

search. Follow the instructions to 

submit public comments and view all 

related materials. We will post all 

comments. 

• Email cheryl.blundon@bsee.gov. 

Mail or hand-carry comments to the 

Department of the Interior; Bureau of 

Safety and Environmental Enforcement; 

Regulations and Standards Branch; 

ATTN: Cheryl Blundon, 45600 

Woodland Road, Sterling, VA 20166. 

Please reference ICR 1014–0008 in your 

comment and include your name and 

return address. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cheryl Blundon, Regulations and 

Standards Branch at (703) 787–1607 to 

request additional information about 

this ICR. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: 30 CFR part 250, subpart O, 

Well Control and Production Safety 

Training. 

OMB Control Number: 1014–0008. 

Abstract: The Outer Continental Shelf 

(OCS) Lands Act, as amended (43 U.S.C. 

1331 et seq. and 43 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), 

authorizes the Secretary of the Interior 

to prescribe rules and regulations 

necessary for the administration of the 

leasing provisions of the Act related to 

mineral resources on the OCS. Such 

rules and regulations will apply to all 

operations conducted under a lease, 

pipeline right-of-way, or a right-of-use 

and easement. Operations on the OCS 

must preserve, protect, and develop oil 

and natural gas resources in a manner 

that is consistent with the need to make 

such resources available to meet the 

Nation’s energy needs as rapidly as 

possible; to balance orderly energy 

resource development with protection 

of human, marine, and coastal 

environments; to ensure the public a fair 

and equitable return on the resources of 

the OCS; and to preserve and maintain 

free enterprise competition. 

In addition to the general rulemaking 

authority of the OCSLA at 43 U.S.C. 

1334, section 301(a) of the Federal Oil 

and Gas Royalty Management Act 

(FOGRMA), 30 U.S.C. 1751(a), grants 

authority to the Secretary to prescribe 

such rules and regulations as are 

reasonably necessary to carry out 

FOGRMA’s provisions. While the 

majority of FOGRMA is directed to 

royalty collection and enforcement, 

some provisions apply to offshore 

operations. For example, section 108 of 

FOGRMA, 30 U.S.C. 1718, grants the 

Secretary broad authority to inspect 

lease sites for the purpose of 

determining whether there is 

compliance with the mineral leasing 

laws. Section 109(c)(2) and (d)(1), 30 

U.S.C. 1719(c)(2) and (d)(1), impose 

substantial civil penalties for failure to 

permit lawful inspections and for 

knowing or willful preparation or 

submission of false, inaccurate, or 

misleading reports, records, or other 

information. Because the Secretary has 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 69 / Friday, April 10, 2015 / Notices 19353 

delegated some of the authority under 

FOGRMA to BSEE, 30 U.S.C. 1751 is 

included as additional authority for 

these requirements. 

Section 1332(6) of the OCS Lands Act 

requires that ‘‘operations in the [O]uter 

Continental Shelf should be conducted 

in a safe manner by well trained 

personnel using technology, 

precautions, and other techniques 

sufficient to prevent or minimize the 

likelihood of blowouts, loss of well 

control, fires, spillages, physical 

obstructions to other users of the waters 

or subsoil and seabed, or other 

occurrences which may cause damage to 

the environment or to property or 

endanger life or health.’’ 

For your information, because of the 

regulatory requirements in 30 CFR 250, 

Subpart S (SEMS), 30 CFR 250, Subpart 

O, audits ceased. The training audits fall 

under the requirements defined in 

§ 250.1915. However, BSEE keeps 

Subpart O documents and regulations 

active because the Subpart O regulatory 

requirements give BSEE the authority 

and ability to test employees on the 

effectiveness of their own training 

program. 

Regulations implementing these 

responsibilities are among those 

delegated to BSEE. The regulations 

under 30 CFR 250, Subpart O, pertain to 

well control and production safety 

training and pertain to training 

requirements for certain personnel 

working on the OCS and is the subject 

of this collection. This request also 

covers the related Notices to Lessees 

and Operators (NTLs) that BSEE issues 

to clarify, supplement, or provide 

additional guidance on some aspects of 

our regulations. 

We will use the information collected 

under Subpart O regulations to ensure 

that workers in the OCS are properly 

trained with the necessary skills to 

perform their jobs in a safe and 

pollution-free manner. 

In some instances, we may conduct 

oral interviews of offshore employees to 

evaluate the effectiveness of a 

company’s training program. The oral 

interviews are used to gauge how 

effectively the companies are 

implementing their own training 

program. 

No questions of a sensitive nature are 

asked. We protect proprietary 

information according to the Freedom of 

Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and 

DOI’s implementing regulations (43 CFR 

2); and under regulations at 30 CFR 

250.197, Data and information to be 

made available to the public or for 

limited inspection, and 30 CFR part 252, 

Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and 

Gas Information Program. Responses are 

mandatory or are required to obtain or 

retain benefits. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Description of Respondents: Potential 

respondents comprise Federal oil, gas, 

or sulphur lessees and/or operators. 

Estimated Reporting and 

Recordkeeping Hour Burden: The 

currently approved annual reporting 

burden for this collection is 2,919 hours. 

In this submission, we are requesting a 

total of 202 burden hours. The following 

chart details the individual components 

and respective hour burden estimates of 

this ICR. In calculating the burdens, we 

assumed that respondents perform 

certain requirements in the normal 

course of their activities. 

We consider these to be usual and 

customary and took that into account in 

estimating the burden. 

Citation 

30 CFR 250 

Subpart O 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirement Hour burden 

Average number 

of annual 

responses 

Annual 

burden 

hours 

1503(a), (c) ....... Develop training plans. Note: Existing lessees/respondents already 

have training plans developed. This number reflects development 

of plans for any new lessees.

120 1 120 

1503(d)(1) ......... Upon request, provide BSEE with copies of training documentation 

for personnel involved in well control, deepwater well control, or 

production safety operations within the past 5 years.

16 1 16 

1503(d)(2) ......... Upon request, provide BSEE with a copy of your training plan .......... 16 1 16 

1507(b) ............. Employee oral interview conducted by BSEE ...................................... 2 1 2 

1507(c), (d); 

1508; 1509.

Written testing conducted by BSEE or authorized representative ....... Not considered information collection 

under 5 CFR 1320.3(h)(7). 

0 

1510(b) ............. Revise training plan and submit to BSEE ............................................ 40 1 40 

250.1500–1510 General departure or alternative compliance requests not specifically 

covered elsewhere in subpart O.

8 1 8 

Total Hour Burden ........................................................................................................................................ 1 202 

Estimated Reporting and 

Recordkeeping Non-Hour Cost Burden: 

We have identified no non-hour cost 

burdens for this collection. 

Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA 

(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. Until OMB approves a 

collection of information, you are not 

obligated to respond. 

Comments: Before submitting an ICR 

to OMB, PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A) 

requires each agency ‘‘* * * to provide 

notice * * * and otherwise consult 

with members of the public and affected 

agencies concerning each proposed 

collection of information * * *’’. 

Agencies must specifically solicit 

comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the 

collection is necessary or useful; (b) 

evaluate the accuracy of the burden of 

the proposed collection of information; 

(c) enhance the quality, usefulness, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) minimize the burden 

on the respondents, including the use of 

technology. 

Agencies must also estimate the nonhour paperwork cost burdens to 

respondents or recordkeepers resulting 

from the collection of information. 

Therefore, if you have other than hour 

burden costs to generate, maintain, and 

disclose this information, you should 

comment and provide your total capital 

and startup cost components or annual 

operation, maintenance, and purchase 

of service components. For further 

information on this burden, refer to 5 

CFR 1320.3(b)(1) and (2), or contact the 

Bureau representative listed previously 

in this notice. 

We will summarize written responses 

to this notice and address them in our 

submission for OMB approval. As a 

result of your comments, we will make 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

19354 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 69 / Friday, April 10, 2015 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

any necessary adjustments to the burden 

in our submission to OMB. 

Public Comment Procedures: Before 

including your address, phone number, 

email address, or other personal 

identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: April 7, 2015. 

Douglas W. Morris, 

Chief, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08265 Filed 4–9–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–908] 

Certain Soft-Edged Trampolines and 

Components Thereof Notice of Final 

Determination of No Violation; 

Termination of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined that no 

violation of section 337 has been proven 

in the above-captioned investigation. 

The Commission’s determination is 

final, and this investigation is 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 

205–3438. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on January 30, 2014, based on a 

complaint filed by Springfree 

Trampoline, Inc. of Markham, Canada, 

Springfree Trampoline USA Inc. of 

Markham, Canada, and Spring Free 

Limited Partnership of Markham, 

Canada (collectively, ‘‘Springfree’’). 79 

FR 4956 (Jan. 30, 2014). The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, in the importation, sale for 

importation, or sale within the United 

States after importation of certain softedged trampolines and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

claims 1 and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 

6,319,174 (‘‘the ’174 patent’’). Id. The 

notice of investigation names Vuly 

Trampolines Pty. Ltd. of Brisbane, 

Australia (‘‘Vuly’’) as the sole 

respondent. Id. at 4957. The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations did not 

participate in the investigation. Id. 

On December 5, 2014, the 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued 

a final ID finding no violation of section 

337. On December 18, 2014, the ALJ 

issued a recommended determination 

(‘‘RD’’) on remedy and bonding. On 

December 22, 2014, Springfree and Vuly 

filed petitions for review challenging 

various findings in the final ID. On 

January 2, 2015, the parties filed 

responses. The Commission did not 

receive any post-RD public interest 

comments from the public or the 

parties. 

On February 5, 2015, the Commission 

determined to review the final ID in part 

and requested additional briefing from 

the parties on certain issues. The 

Commission also solicited briefing from 

the parties and the public on the issues 

of remedy, bonding, and the public 

interest. On February 19, 2015, the 

parties filed briefs addressing the 

Commission’s questions and the issues 

of remedy, bonding, and the public 

interest. On March 2, 2015, the parties 

filed reply briefs. 

Having examined the record of this 

investigation, including the ALJ’s final 

ID and submissions from the parties, the 

Commission has determined to affirm 

the ALJ’s determination of no violation. 

As explained more fully in the 

forthcoming Commission opinion, the 

Commission has determined to construe 

‘‘flexible mat’’ in the first instance, 

modify the ALJ’s construction of ‘‘first 

retaining means,’’ and affirm, but on 

modified grounds, the ALJ’s 

construction of ‘‘flexible elongated rod.’’ 

The Commission has determined to 

affirm, but on modified grounds, the 

ALJ’s findings that Vuly’s products 

infringe claim 13, that Springfree’s 

products practice claim 13, that claim 1 

is not invalid as anticipated by the prior 

art, that claim 13 is invalid as 

anticipated by the prior art, and that 

claims 1 and 13 are not invalid due to 

lack of enablement. The Commission 

has determined to reverse the ALJ’s 

findings that Vuly’s products infringe 

claim 1, that Springfree’s products do 

not practice claim 1, and that Springfree 

did not satisfy the technical prong of the 

domestic industry requirement as to 

claims 1 and 13. The Commission has 

determined to affirm the ALJ’s finding 

that Springfree did not satisfy the 

economic prong of the domestic 

industry requirement. The Commission 

has determined not to reach the issue of 

whether claim 13 is obvious. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 6, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08223 Filed 4–9–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1269 

(Preliminary)] 

Silicomanganese from Australia; 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigation, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to section 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)) (‘‘the Act’’), 

that there is a reasonable indication that 

an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

from Australia of silicomanganese, 

provided for in subheading 7202.30.00 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States, that are alleged to be 

sold in the United States at less than fair 

value (‘‘LTFV’’). 

Commencement of Final Phase 

Investigation 

Pursuant to section 207.18 of the 

Commission’s rules, the Commission 

also gives notice of the commencement 

of the final phase of its investigation. 

The Commission will issue a final phase 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES