alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6026
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WARREN LAMAR EDNEY, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-49-P, CA-97-550-3-P) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren Lamar Edney, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Edney , Nos. CR-91-49-P; CA-97-550-3-P (W.D.N.C. Nov. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Subject: Relationship between W126 annual values and the 3 - year average 8 - hour standard

From: Jeffrey Herrick ORD/NCEA/NCEA - RTP/EMAG To: Reconsideration of the 2008 O zone NAAQS Docket ( EPA - HQ - OAR - 2005 - 0172 ) Memo to Docket The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the relationship between annual W126 values and the 3 - year averages of the annual values in counties that meet the level of the current 3 - year average 0.075 secondary standard in 2009. The scatter plot belo w shows the county - level comparison of the highest annual W126 values from 2007 to 2009 plotted against the 3 - year average of the 4 th highest maximum 8 - hr average. (The annual values are the highest among all monitors in the county in each year. The 3 - ye ar average is the highest average among all monitors in the county.) The data shown is from all counties that meet the level of the current 3 - year average 0.075 secondary standard in 2009. The upper level of the of the annual W126 values recommended by the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee was 15 ppm - hrs. In 2009, 130 counties that met the level of the current secondary standard (0.075) had annual W126 levels above 15 ppm

– hours. Thirty - one of these areas had annual W126 levels above 20 ppm - hours . Notes on data source and handling: For this comparison, 2007 - 2009 monitoring data were obtained from EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS). Annual and three - year average W126 values were computed for each monitor in accordance with the data handling procedu res in the proposed 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix P ( http://www.epa.gov/air/ozonepollution/fr/20100119.pdf ).
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,708
<SECURITIES>                                    33,585
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,650
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,261
<PP&E>                                          18,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,867
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           126
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,415
<SALES>                                         40,704
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,380
<CGS>                                            7,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                75,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   977
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    334
<INCOME-TAX>                                       106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                228
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       228
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION

                     EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

      The following is a list of subsidiaries of Direct General Corporation at
December 31, 2005. All corporations are subsidiaries of Direct General
Corporation and, if indented, subsidiaries of the company under which they are
listed.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Company                                            Incorporated
--------------------------------------------------------   ------------
<S>                                                        <C>
Direct Adjusting Company                                        TN
Direct Administration, Inc.                                     TN
Direct General Agency of Georgia, Inc.                          GA
Direct General Agency of Kentucky, Inc.                         KY
Direct General Consumer Products, Inc.                          TN
Direct General Financial Services, Inc.                         TN
Direct General Insurance Agency of Louisiana, Inc.              LA
Direct General Insurance Agency of North Carolina, Inc.         NC
Direct General Insurance Agency of South Carolina, Inc.         SC
Direct General Insurance Agency of Tennessee, Inc.              TN
Direct General Insurance Agency, Inc.                           AR
Direct General Insurance Agency, Inc.                           MS
Direct General Insurance Agency, Inc.                           TN
Direct General Insurance Agency, Inc.                           TX
Direct General Insurance Company                                SC
         Direct General Insurance Company of Mississippi        MS
         Direct General Life Insurance Company                  SC
         Direct Life Insurance Company                          GA
Direct General Insurance Company of Louisiana                   LA
Direct General Premium Finance Services, Inc.                   TN
Direct Insurance Company                                        TN
Direct National Insurance Company                               AR
</TABLE>

      The names of certain subsidiaries are omitted; as such subsidiaries in the
aggregate would not constitute a significant subsidiary.
# California's 129th Rescue Wing saves man from fishing vessel

/ Published Dec. 17, 2014

MOFFETT FEDERAL AIRFIELD, Calif.- Air National Guard members from the 129th Rescue Wing completed an overwater rescue mission on Monday, saving the life of a 24-year-old man on a commercial fishing vessel about 160 nautical miles off the coast of Monterey, California.

At approximately 3 p.m. the 129th RQW accepted a mission tasking from the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center concerning an ill man onboard a 65-foot commercial fishing vessel, Temptation. The patient required treatment beyond the capabilities of those onboard.

A team of three Guardian Angel pararescuemen from the 129th RQW onboard an HH-60G Pave Hawk rescue helicopter flew to Temptation to administer care to thepatient. The pararescuemen extracted the patient from the vessel at 5 p.m. and flew him to San Jose Regional Medical Center. The patient arrived in San Jose, California,after 6 p.m. and is in stable condition, according to a representative from San Jose Regional Medical Center.

The primary mission of the 129th RQW is to perform its wartime mission of personnel recovery anywhere in the world. Equipped with MC-130P Combat Shadow aircraft and HH-60G Pave Hawk rescue helicopters, the 129th RQW has performed a wide variety of civilian personnel recovery missions, including the rescue of distressed persons aboard ships, lost or injured hikers and medical evacuations. To date, the wing is credited with saving the lives of over 1,000 people.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03713**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  03713\03713_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 03713\03713_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03713\03713_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03713\03713_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03713\03713_partA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03713\03713_partE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03713\03713_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03713\Supporting documents\03713_coverletter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03713\Supporting documents\Aerial shot of plant.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03713\Supporting documents\SCGC A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03713\Supporting documents\Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
In the Senate of the United States, 

September 25, 2009. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 3614) entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small 

Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 

1958, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike sections 2 and 3. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H.R. 3614 

AMENDMENT
II 

Calendar No. 386 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3634 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 3, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 109 Main Street in Swifton, Arkansas, as 

the ‘‘George Kell Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GEORGE KELL POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 109 Main Street in Swifton, Ar6 kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘George 

7 Kell Post Office’’. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3634 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George Kell Post Of5 fice’’. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS

PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 386 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3634 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostArkansas, as the ‘‘George Kell Post Office’’. al Service located at 109 Main Street in Swifton, 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 27, 2009

l0324 

# Order

March 27, 2009

137960

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137960 COA: 287608 Wayne CC: 07-009514-FH JOHNNY LEE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 7, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , C.J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the order denying leave to appeal . I write separately only to note that

this Court has not addressed defendant’s ar gument regarding the imposition of costs and fees because it is not properly before the Co urt. However, defendant may raise the issue

in a motion for relief from judgment under MCR 6.508.
12:00 P.M.

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

June Crop Production

Executive Summary

Lance Honig, Chief

Crops Branch

June 9, 2017
USDA-NASS

6-9-17

Field Crops Fruit & Nuts Specialty Crops

Winter Wheat Citrus Maple Syrup

Prunes Hops

Contents
USDA-NASS

6-9-17

Ag Yield Objective Yield

Survey Type Farmer Reported Field Measurement

Crops Included Winter and Durum Wheat Winter Wheat

States 26 10

Sample Size 3,857 1,090

Collection Period May 30-June 6 May 25-June 1

Survey Overview
25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Percent

U.S. Winter Wheat Condition

Percent Rated Good to Excellent

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

USDA-NASS

6-9-17
USDA-NASS

6-9-17

U.S. Winter Wheat Progress

Percent Headed

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Percent
USDA-NASS

6-9-17

June 2017 Crop Production

% Change % Change

From From

Crop Unit June Previous Previous

2017 Forecast Season 

Wheat, Winter

Harvested Mil Ac 25.6 NC -15.4

Yield Bu/Ac 48.9 +0.2 -11.6

Production Bil Bu 1.25 +0.3 -25.2

Production by Class

Hard Red Mil Bu 743 +0.8 -31.3

Soft Red Mil Bu 298 +0.5 -13.6

White Mil Bu 209 -1.5 -14.6
48.9

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

Bushels per Acre Winter Wheat Yield

United States

Yield Linear (Yield)

USDA-NASS

6-9-17
USDA-NASS

6-9-17
2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014 2015

2016 Jun-17

0.530

0.540

0.550

0.560

0.570

0.580

0.590

0.600

0.610

0.620

0.630

0.640

0.650

0.660

0.670

0.680

0.690

38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Grams/Head

Heads Per Square Foot

Wheat Objective Yield Region

Heads Per Square Foot vs. Implied Head Weight

Implied Head Weight = Published Yield / (Heads*1.6006)

USDA-NASS

6-9-17
USDA-NASS

6-9-17

June 2017 Crop Production

% Change % Change

From From

Crop Unit June Previous Previous

2017 Forecast Season 

Production

Oranges Mil Tons 5.18 +0.4 -14.9

Grapefruit Thou Tons 672 NC -16.3

Tangerines & 

Mandarins Thou Tons 957 -<0.1 +0.8
USDA-NASS

6-9-17

June 2017 Crop Production

% Change % Change

From From

Crop Unit June Previous Previous

2017 Forecast Season 

Production

Maple Syrup Mil Gal 4.27 NA +1.5

Prunes, dried (CA) Thou Tons 105 NA +133.3

Acreage

Hops Thou Ac 54.1 NA +6.4
USDA-NASS

6-9-17

Release Date Report Title

June 9 Cherry Production

June 16 Potato Stocks

June 23 Cattle on Feed

June 27 Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts – Ann.

June 29 Agricultural Prices

Hogs and Pigs

June 30

Acreage

Grain Stocks

Rice Stocks

July 5

CAIR: Cotton System

CAIR: Fats & Oils

CAIR: Grain Crushings

July 12 Crop Production

Upcoming Reports
United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

202-720-2127

800-727-9540

nass@nass.usda.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23A



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Linens 'n Things, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Numbers
333-71903, 333-55803, 333-26827 and 333-26819 on Form S-8 of Linens 'n Things,
Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated February 2, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Linens 'n Things, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
January 1, 2000 and December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended January 1, 2000, which report appears in the January 1,
2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Linens 'n Things, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 30, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17821-17822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Dockets DOT-OST-2014-0097 and DOT-OST-2014-0098]


Applications of Jet Aviation Flight Services, Inc. for 
Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2015-3-18) Dockets DOT-
OST-2014-0097 and DOT-OST-2014-0098

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue orders finding Jet 
Aviation Flight Services, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and awarding it 
certificates of public convenience and necessity to engage in 
interstate and foreign charter air transportation of persons, property 
and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
April 10, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Dockets DOT-OST-2014-0097 and DOT-OST-2014-0098 and addressed to U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West

[[Page 17822]]

Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon 
the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lauralyn Remo, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

Brandon M. Belford,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2015-07564 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 4910-9X-P
& b 8

6

œ.

> bœ.

>

Allegro

f

œ.

> #œ.

> nœ>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

nœ

>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m.100, 2nd beat

fi

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ. 6

5

Œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

& b œ J

œ œ Jœ œ. J

œ ‰ ‰

13

5

Œ j

œ #œ

j

œ

f

 ̇. Œ j

œ #œ

j

œ

F

21

œ Jœnœ Jœ

& b œ

j

œ #œ

j

œ œ. j

œ

‰ ‰

2

Œ Jœ œ Jœ

f

 ̇. ‰ œ

>

œ

>

œ. >

29

 ̇.

& b ‰

œ

>

œ

>

œ.

>

 ̇. ‰ œ œ œ œ œ œ

œ œ œ œ œ œœ œ œ œ œ J

œ

‰ ‰ Œ. 6

37

& b Œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ. J

œ ‰ ‰

45

5

Œ j

œ #œ

j

œ

f

 ̇. Œ j

œ #œ

j

œ

F

53

& b œ J

œnœ Jœ œ

j

œ #œ

j

œ œ. j

œ

‰ ‰

2

Œ Jœ œ Jœ

f

 ̇. ‰ œ

>

œ

>

œ. >

61

& b  ̇. ‰

œ

>

œ

>

œ.

>

 ̇. ‰ œ œ œ œ œ œ

œ œ œ œ œ œœ œ œ œ œ J

œ

‰ ‰ Œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

The Official Song of the National Guard Bureau Words and Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

 40th Army Band, VTARNG

Baritone T.C.

Dedicated to the Men and Women, Soldiers and Airmen of America's National Guard
& b

6

69

Œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ. J

œ ‰ ‰

77

5

Œ j

œ #œ

j

œ

f

 ̇.

& b Œ j

œ #œ

j

œ

F

85

œ Jœnœ Jœ œ

j

œ #œ

j

œ œ. j

œ

‰ ‰

2

Œ Jœ œ Jœ

f

 ̇.

& b ‰ œ

>

œ

>

œ. >

93

 ̇. ‰

œ

>

œ

>

œ.

>

 ̇. ‰ œ œ œ œ œ œ

œ œ œ œ œ œœ œ œ œ œ

fi

J

œ

‰ ‰ Œ.

Ceremonial version,

from m.4

& b ‰ œ

- œ- œ œ œ

- 101

F

œ

J

œ œ J

œ œ. œ. œ œ

- œ

- œ j

œ

- œ

œ œ

- œ œ œ

- œ

- œ œ œ œ œ œ J

œ œ

J

œ

& b œ. J

œ ‰ ‰ ‰ œ

- œ

- œ œ œ

- 109

œ

J

œ œ J

œ œ. œ œ

- œ

- œ. J

œ ‰ ‰ œ

- œ œ œ œ œ œ

-

œ œ œ œ œ

& b œJ

œ œ J

œ J

œ

‰ ‰ Œ. ‰ œ

- œ- œ œ œ

- 117

œ

J

œ œ J

œ œ. œ. œ œ

- œ

- œ j

œ

- œ

- œ œ œ œ œ

& b œ

- œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ. J

œ ‰ ‰ ‰ œ

>

œ

>>

œ. 125

f

œ. Jœ

‰ ‰ ‰ œ

>

œ

>>

œ. Jœ

‰ ‰

>

œ.

& b

œ

>

œ

>

œ

> œ

>

J

œ

>

ƒ

œ

>

J

œ

> œ. >

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ. 2

j

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ.

ƒ

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

2 -Baritone T.C.-
Letter:

Open your mind to Open Skies

Chicago benefits from the Open Skies agreements. Don't mess with them.

I urge the Tribune editorial board to broaden its perspective on the Open Skies 

issue beyond the complaints of a few U.S. airlines (“Not a fair flight; The 3 

major U.S. carriers have a valid complaint against their Middle East rivals”).

The 30-year-old Open Skies agreements — which enjoyed the full and active 

support of U.S. airlines when written — have worked. Airfares are 32 percent 

lower on Open Skies routes compared to regulated routes, saving American 

travelers billions. Last year, 74 million international travelers visited the U.S. 

and spent $180 billion on travel goods and services, directly supporting more 

than 1 million U.S. jobs. Those numbers will fall if we limit flights here but rise 

if we expand them.

Make no mistake: If American, Delta and United succeed in limiting Open 

Skies in one market, it will destroy the very foundation of Open Skies around 

the world. Then we’d be back to an era of regulated aviation, higher fares and 

fewer consumer choices.

Chicago’s is among the many regional economies enjoying the benefits of the 

burgeoning international travel market. Tampering with Open Skies would 

harm that progress, perhaps irrevocably.

— Roger Dow, president and CEO, U.S. Travel Association, Washington