19094 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 

preparing and in taking certain 

protective actions in the event of a 

radiological emergency; (2) address, in 

part, security issues identified after the 

terrorist events of September 11, 2001; 

(3) clarify regulations to effect 

consistent emergency plan 

implementation among licensees; and 

(4) modify certain EP requirements to be 

more effective and efficient. However, 

the EP Final Rule was only an 

enhancement to the NRC’s regulations 

and was not necessary for adequate 

protection. On page 72563 of the 

Federal Register notice for the EP Final 

Rule, the Commission ‘‘determined that 

the existing regulatory structure ensures 

adequate protection of public health and 

safety and common defense and 

security.’’ 

II. Environmental Assessment 

Description of Proposed Action 

The proposed action would exempt 

ZNPS, a 10 CFR part 50 licensee, from 

certain 10 CFR part 50 EP requirements 

because ZNPS is a permanently shutdown nuclear facility. 

The proposed action is in accordance 

with the licensee’s application dated 

June 20, 2012, (ADAMS Accession No. 

ML12173A316). 

Need for Proposed Action 

ZNPS was shut down on February 21, 

1997, and is currently in a permanently 

shut-down and defueled condition. In a 

letter dated May 4, 1998, the NRC 

acknowledged that pursuant to 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(2), the 10 CFR part 50 licenses 

for ZNPS, Units 1 and 2 no longer 

authorize operation of the reactors, or 

emplacement or retention of fuel in the 

reactor vessels. Active decommissioning 

is currently underway. 

The licensee claims that the proposed 

action is needed because the Final Rule 

imposed requirements on ZNPS that are 

not necessary to meet the underlying 

purpose of the regulations in view of the 

greatly reduced offsite radiological 

consequences associated with the 

current plant status as permanently shut 

down. The EP program at this facility 

met the EP requirements in 10 CFR part 

50 that were in effect before December 

23, 2011, subject to any license 

amendments or exemptions modifying 

the EP requirements for the licensee. 

Thus, compliance with the EP 

requirements in effect before the 

effective date of the EP Final Rule 

demonstrated reasonable assurance that 

adequate protective measures could be 

taken in the event of a radiological 

emergency. 

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed 

Action 

The NRC staff evaluated the 

environmental impacts of the proposed 

action and concludes that exempting the 

facility from the emergency planning 

requirements will not have any adverse 

environmental impacts. With respect to 

radiological impacts, the NRC has 

determined that no credible events at 

ZNPS would result in doses to the 

public beyond the owner controlled area 

boundary that would exceed the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Protective Actions Guides at the site 

boundary. The proposed action is 

wholly procedural and administrative in 

nature. As such, the proposed action 

will not: Significantly increase the 

probability or consequences of 

radiological accidents, result in any 

changes to the types of effluents that 

may be released offsite, and result in 

any significant increase in occupational 

or public radiation exposure. Therefore, 

there are no significant radiological 

environmental impacts associated with 

the proposed action. 

With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 

action does not involve any 

construction activities, renovation of 

buildings or structures, ground 

disturbing activities or other alteration 

to land. The proposed action will not 

change the site activities and therefore 

will not result in any changes to the 

workforce or vehicular traffic. 

Furthermore, the proposed action is not 

a type of activity that has the potential 

to cause effects on historic properties or 

cultural resources, including traditional 

cultural properties. In addition the 

proposed action will not result in any 

change to non-radiological plant 

effluents and thus, will have no impact 

on either air or water quality. As the 

proposed action is wholly procedural 

and administrative in nature, the NRC 

staff has determined that the proposed 

action will have no effect on listed 

species or critical habitat. Therefore, 

there are no significant non-radiological 

environmental impacts associated with 

the proposed action. 

Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes 

that there are no significant 

environmental impacts associated with 

the proposed action. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Alternatives to the Proposed Action 

As an alternative to the proposed 

action, the NRC staff considered denial 

of the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘noaction’’ alternative). Denial of the 

exemption request would result in no 

change in current environmental 

impacts because there will be no 

construction or major renovation of any 

buildings or structures, nor any 

associated ground disturbing activities. 

Thus the environmental impacts of the 

proposed action and no-action 

alternative are similar. Therefore, the 

no-action alternative is not further 

considered. 

Conclusion 

The NRC staff has concluded that the 

proposed action will not significantly 

impact the quality of the human 

environment, and that the proposed 

action is the preferred alternative. 

Agencies and Persons Consulted 

The NRC contacted the Illinois 

Emergency Management Agency 

concerning this request. There were no 

comments, concerns or objections from 

the State official. 

III. Finding of No Significant Impact 

The NRC staff has prepared this EA as 

part of its review of the proposed action. 

On the basis of this EA, the NRC finds 

that there are no significant 

environmental impacts from the 

proposed action, and that preparation of 

an environmental impact statement is 

not warranted. Accordingly, the NRC 

has determined that a Finding of No 

Significant Impact (FONSI) is 

appropriate. In accordance with 10 CFR 

51.32(a)(4), this FONSI incorporates the 

EA set forth in this notice by reference. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day 

of March 2015. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Larry W. Camper, 

Director, Division of Decommissioning, 

Uranium Recovery, and Waste Programs, 

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and 

Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08169 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

Privacy Act of 1974; Computer 

Matching Program 

AGENCY: Office of Personnel 

Management. 

ACTION: Notice—computer matching 

between the Office of Personnel 

Management and the Social Security 

Administration (Computer Matching 

Agreement 1018). 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 

amended by the Computer Matching 

and Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (Pub. 

L. 100–503), Office of Management and 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 19095 

Budget (OMB) Guidelines on the 

Conduct of Matching Programs (54 FR 

25818 published June 19, 1989), and 

OMB Circular No. A–130, revised 

November 28, 2000, ‘‘Management of 

Federal Information Resources,’’ the 

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 

is publishing notice of its new computer 

matching program with the Social 

Security Administration (SSA). 

DATES: OPM will file a report of the 

subject matching program with the 

Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the 

Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform of the House of 

Representatives and the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). The matching program will 

begin May 11, 2015 or 40 days after the 

date of OPM’s submission of the letters 

to Congress and OMB, whichever is 

later. The matching program will 

continue for 18 months from the 

beginning date and may be extended an 

additional 12 months thereafter. 

Subsequent matches will run until one 

of the parties advises the other in 

writing of its intention to reevaluate, 

modify and/or terminate the agreement. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Deon 

Mason, Chief, Business Services, 

Retirement Services, Office of Personnel 

Management, Room 3316–G, 1900 E 

Street NW., Washington, DC 20415. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bernard A. Wells III on 202–606–2730 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. General 

The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 

amended, establishes the conditions 

under which computer matching 

involving the Federal government could 

be performed and adding certain 

protections for individuals applying for 

and receiving Federal benefits. Section 

7201 of the Omnibus Budget 

Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101– 

508) further amended the Privacy Act 

regarding protections for such 

individuals. 

The Privacy Act, as amended, 

regulates the use of computer matching 

by Federal agencies when records in a 

system of records are matched with 

other Federal, State, or local government 

records. Among other things, it requires 

Federal agencies involved in computer 

matching programs to: 

(1) Negotiate written agreements with 

the other agency for agencies 

participating in the matching programs; 

(2) Obtain the approval of the match 

agreement by the Data Integrity Boards 

(DIB) of the participating Federal 

agencies; 

(3) Furnish detailed reports about 

matching programs to Congress and 

OMB; 

(4) Notify applicants and beneficiaries 

that their records are subject to 

matching; 

(5) Verify match findings before 

reducing, suspending, termination or 

denying an individual’s benefits or 

payments. 

B. OPM Computer Matches Subject to 

the Privacy Act 

We have taken action to ensure that 

all of OPM’s computer matching 

programs comply with the requirements 

of the Privacy Act, as amended. 

Notice of Computer Matching Program, 

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 

With the Social Security 

Administration (SSA). 

A. Participating Agencies 

OPM and SSA. 

B. Purpose of the Matching Program 

The purpose of this agreement is to 

establish the conditions under which 

SSA agrees to disclose tax return and/ 

or Social Security benefit information to 

OPM. The SSA records will be used in 

redetermining and recomputing the 

benefits of certain annuitants and 

survivors whose computations are 

based, in part, on military service 

performed after December 1956 under 

the Civil Service Retirement System 

(CSRS) and certain annuitants and 

survivors whose annuity computation 

under the Federal Employees 

Retirement System (FERS) have a CSRS 

component. 

C. Authority for Conducting the 

Matching Program 

Chapters 83 and 84 of title 5 of the 

United States Code provide the basis for 

computing annuities under CSRS and 

FERS, respectively, and require release 

of information by SSA to OPM in order 

to administer data exchanges involving 

military service performed by an 

individual after December 31, 1956. The 

CSRS requirement is codified at section 

8332(j) of title 5 of the United States 

Code; the FERS requirement is codified 

at section 8422(e)(4) of title 5 of the 

United States Code. The responsibilities 

of SSA and OPM with respect to 

information obtained pursuant to this 

agreement are also in accordance with 

the following: the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 

552a), as amended; section 307 of the 

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 

1982 (Pub. L. 97–253), codified at 

section 8332 Note of title 5 of the United 

States Code; section 1306(a) of title 42 

of the United States Code; and section 

6103(1)(11) of title 26 of the United 

States Code. 

D. Categories of Records and 

Individuals Covered by the Match 

SSA will disclose data from its MBR 

file (60–0090, Master Beneficiary 

Record, SSA/OEEAS) and MEF file (60– 

0059, Earnings Recording and SelfEmployment Income System, SSA/

OEEAS) and manually-extracted 

military wage information from SSA’s 

‘‘1086’’ microfilm file when required (71 

FR 1796, January 11, 2006). OPM will 

provide SSA with an electronic finder 

file from the OPM system of records 

published as OPM/Central-1 (Civil 

Service Retirement and Insurance 

Records) on October 8, 1999 (64 FR 

54930), as amended on March 20, 2008 

(73 FR 15013). The system of records 

involved have routine uses permitting 

the disclosures needed to conduct this 

match. 

E. Privacy Safeguards and Security 

The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 

552a(o)(1)(G)) requires that each 

matching agreement specify procedures 

for ensuring the administrative, 

technical and physical security of the 

records matched and the results of such 

programs. 

All Federal agencies are subject to: 

The Federal Information Security 

Management Act of 2002 (FISMA) (44 

U.S.C. 3541 et seq.); related OMB 

circulars and memorandum (e.g., OMB 

Circular A–130 and OMB M–06–16); 

National Institute of Science and 

Technology (NIST) directives; and the 

Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR). 

These laws, circulars, memoranda 

directives and regulations include 

requirements for safeguarding Federal 

information systems and personally 

identifiable information used in Federal 

agency business processes, as well as 

related reporting requirements. OPM 

and SSA recognize that all laws, 

circulars, memoranda, directives and 

regulations relating to the subject of this 

agreement and published subsequent to 

the effective date of this agreement must 

also be implemented if mandated. 

FISMA requirements apply to all 

Federal contractors and organizations or 

sources that possess or use Federal 

information, or that operate, use, or 

have access to Federal information 

systems on behalf of an agency. OPM 

will be responsible for oversight and 

compliance of their contractors and 

agents. Both OPM and SSA reserve the 

right to conduct onsite inspection to 

monitor compliance with FISMA 

regulations. 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
19096 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73703 

(December 4, 2014), 79 FR 72039. 

4The Exchange also submitted a copy of the 

amendment to the public comment file. See letter 

from Martha Redding, Chief Counsel, New York 

Stock Exchange, to Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy 

Secretary, Commission, dated December 22, 2014. 

5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 

F. Inclusive Dates of the Match 

The matching program shall become 

effective upon the signing of the 

agreement by both parties to the 

agreement and approval of the 

agreement by the Data Integrity Boards 

of the respective agencies, but no sooner 

than 40 days after notice of this 

matching program is sent to Congress 

and the Office of Management and 

Budget or 30 days after publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register, 

whichever is later. The matching 

program will continue for 18 months 

from the effective date and may be 

extended for an additional 12 months 

thereafter, if certain conditions are met. 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

Katherine Archuleta, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08097 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325–38–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

Temporary Emergency Committee of 

the Board of Governors; Sunshine Act 

Meeting 

DATES AND TIMES: March 24, 2015, at 4 

p.m. 

PLACE: Washington, DC, via 

Teleconference. 

STATUS: Committee Votes to Close 

March 24, 2015, Meeting: By telephone 

vote on March 24, 2015, members of the 

Temporary Emergency Committee of the 

Board of Governors of the United States 

Postal Service met and voted 

unanimously to close to public 

observation its meeting held in 

Washington, DC, via teleconference. The 

Committee determined that no earlier 

public notice was possible. 

MATTERS CONSIDERED: 

Tuesday, March 24, 2015, at 4 p.m. 

1. Strategic Issues. 

2. Financial Matters. 

3. Pricing. 

GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The 

General Counsel of the United States 

Postal Service has certified that the 

meeting was properly closed under the 

Government in the Sunshine Act. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Requests for information about the 

meeting should be addressed to the 

Secretary of the Board, Julie S. Moore, 

at 202–268–4800. 

Julie S. Moore, 

Secretary, Board of Governors. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08242 Filed 4–7–15; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

Temporary Emergency Committee of 

the Board of Governors; Sunshine Act 

Meeting 

DATES AND TIMES: March 27, 2015, at 3 

p.m. 

PLACE: Washington DC, via 

Teleconference. 

STATUS: Committee Votes to Close 

March 27, 2015, Meeting: By telephone 

vote on March 27, 2015, members of the 

Temporary Emergency Committee of the 

Board of Governors of the United States 

Postal Service met and voted 

unanimously to close to public 

observation its meeting held in 

Washington, DC, via teleconference. The 

Committee determined that no earlier 

public notice was possible. 

MATTERS CONSIDERED: 

Friday, March 27, 2015, at 3 p.m. 

1. Strategic Issues. 

2. Financial Matters. 

3. Pricing. 

GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The 

General Counsel of the United States 

Postal Service has certified that the 

meeting was properly closed under the 

Government in the Sunshine Act. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Requests for information about the 

meeting should be addressed to the 

Secretary of the Board, Julie S. Moore, 

at 202–268–4800. 

Julie S. Moore, 

Secretary, Board of Governors. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08241 Filed 4–7–15; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[File No. 500–1] 

In the Matter of Chatter Box Call Center 

Ltd., Euro Group of Companies, Inc., 

and Golden Century Resources 

Limited; Order of Suspension of 

Trading 

April 7, 2015. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Chatter Box 

Call Center Ltd. because it has not filed 

any periodic reports since the period 

ended December 31, 2011. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Euro Group 

of Companies, Inc. because it has not 

filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended June 30, 2011. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Golden 

Century Resources Limited because it 

has not filed any periodic reports since 

the period ended March 31, 2012. 

The Commission is of the opinion that 

the public interest and the protection of 

investors require a suspension of trading 

in the securities of the above-listed 

companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 

pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 

trading in the securities of the abovelisted companies is suspended for the 

period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 7, 

2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 

20, 2015. 

By the Commission. 

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08260 Filed 4–7–15; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–74642; File No. SR–NYSE– 

2014–59] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New 

York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of 

Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule 

Change, as Modified by Partial 

Amendment No. 1, Amending Rule 13 

and Related Rules Governing Order 

Types and Modifiers 

April 3, 2015. 

On November 14, 2014, New York 

Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘Exchange’’) filed 

with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant 

to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 

19b-4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule 

change to amend Exchange Rule 13 and 

other Exchange rules governing order 

types and order modifiers. The 

proposed rule change was published in 

the Federal Register on December 4, 

2014.3 On December 22, 2014, the 

Exchange submitted Partial Amendment 

No. 1 to the Commission.4 On January 

14, 2015, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of 

the Act,5 the Commission designated a 

longer period within which to approve 

the proposed rule change, disapprove 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES