alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

The meeting announced below concerns Using Longitudinal Data to Characterize the Natural History of Fragile X Syndrome to Improve Services and Outcomes, DD15-003, initial review.

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         10:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m., April 14, 2015 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters for Discussion:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Using Longitudinal Data to Characterize the Natural History of Fragile X Syndrome to Improve Services and Outcomes, DD15-003, initial review.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         M. Chris Langub, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE., Mailstop F-80, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3585,                         *EEO6@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Catherine Ramadei,

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2015-06849 Filed 3-24-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                              Accountants' Consent
                              --------------------

The Board of Directors
SPACEHAB, Incorporated and subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-43221) on Form S-3 and the registration statements (Nos. 333-3634, 333-3636,
333-3638, 333-36779, 333-43159, and 333-43181) on Form S-8 of Spacehab,
Incorporated of our report dated August 31, 2000, relating to the consolidated
balance sheet of SPACEHAB, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2000,
and the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2000, which
report appears in the June 30, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of Spacehab,
Incorporated.


/s/ KPMG LLP
McLean, Virginia
October 12, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED DECEMBER 31,
     996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                            0001002040
<NAME>                            THE FOREFRONT GROUP, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         6,204,213
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,588,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                     138,600
<INVENTORY>                                      340,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,424,574
<PP&E>                                         1,410,702
<DEPRECIATION>                                   346,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,633,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,600,690
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          62,641
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,953,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,633,934
<SALES>                                       13,798,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              13,798,466
<CGS>                                          2,675,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,675,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              18,980,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 133,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (7,332,588)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (7,332,588)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (7,332,588)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (1.22)


</TABLE>
BARRY CRAIG MALONE, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Res ondent. 

BARRY CRAIG MALONE, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Res a ondent. 

No, 84850 

FH.ED 

21122 

—.TH Ps. DROW:04 surREmE COURT ELIZA 

0 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No, 84849 

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE 

DE Jr:' CLER 

These are consolidated appeals from a judgment of conviction 

in CR21-3919, pursuant to a guilty plea, of possessing, receiving, or 

transferring a stolen vehicle, and a judgment of conviction in CR22-0107, 

pursuant to a guilty plea, of unlawful taking of a motor vehicle. Second 

Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Connie J. Steinheimer, Judge. 

Acknowledging that his sentences are within legal limits and 

consistent with the guilty pleas, appellant Barry Malone urges this court to 

construe his notices of appeal as an expression of dissatisfaction with his 

guilty pleas and remand for the district court to treat them as postconviction 

petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. We decline to do so. If Malone is 

dissatisfied with his guilty pleas, he may file a postconviction petition for a 

writ of habeas corpus in compliance with NRS chapter 34 in the district 

court. Malone's reliance on this court's decision in Harris v. State is 

misplaced because Harris acknowledges that a direct appeal is separate and 

distinct from the remedy of a postconviction habeas petition. 130 Nev. 435, 

445, 329 P.3d 619, 626 (2014) (recognizing that "excepted from the 

exclusive-remedy language [in NRS 34.724 is] the remedy of a direct appeal 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 194in 2. - 32013 
, Sr.J. 

•C.J. 

Parraguirre 

Herndon 

and remedies that are incident to the proceedings in the trial court" 

(internal quotation marks omitted)). Because Malone does not challenge 

the judgments of conviction or sentences, he has not demonstrated any 

error. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgments of the district court AFFIRMED.1

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge 

Washoe County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the 

decision of this matter under a general order of assignrnent. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
# Gen. Frank Grass sends holiday letter to National Guard family

/ Published Dec. 24, 2013

To Our National Guard Family,

As 2013 draws to a close, I want to thank all National Guard members across the globe for the outstanding job you've done this year. You are the critical element to maintaining our status as a world-class operational force and the first line of defense in the Homeland. I owe just as much thanks to your families because they are the foundation upon which our success is built. Without their support, our operational tempo would quickly become unsustainable.

In the vein of maintaining our force, it's important to remain vigilant against situations that can increase risk, whether you're in a combat zone or in your hometown. Particularly concerning to me is the role that excessive alcohol consumption can play in poor decision-making over the holidays. Your Battle Buddy or your Wingman is an important ally in combating these risks. Incidents, such as sexual harassment and drinking-and-driving serve to degrade our force and call our individual and collective credibility into question. Do your best to help your fellow Guard members avoid putting themselves in positions of unnecessary risk. 

Unfortunately, the Army National Guard has trended in the wrong direction with regard to suicides this year, so I ask you to remain especially vigilant in supporting your fellow Soldiers and Airmen who might be experiencing hardships. As a National Guard, we pride ourselves on our ability to protect and defend this great nation from those who would do us harm and to assist our communities during times of natural disaster. During this holiday season, it is likewise important for all of us to watch out for and protect each other.

While the holidays can be a time of great joy for many families, we are mindful of the fact that there are many of us who are deployed overseas. We owe a great debt of gratitude to these selfless men and women who have chosen to defend our interests regardless of the season. Our thoughts are with you.

Thank you for your continued vigilance over this holiday season. Pat and I wish you and your family a happy holiday season and a safe and festive new year!

General Frank GrassChief, National Guard Bureau
# Nevada National Guard Safeguards ‘America's Party’

/ Published Jan. 2, 2024

LAS VEGAS – The Nevada National Guard completed its 24th year supporting first responders during Las Vegas’ annual New Year’s Eve celebration, ”America's Party,” which attracted over 300,000 people.

Approximately 200 Nevada Guard Soldiers and Airmen were on duty during the activation, ensuring safety, aiding in crowd control and providing medical support. Most of the Guardsmen collaborated with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department on the Strip and downtown for the New Year's Eve celebration.

The commitment of National Guard Soldiers and Airmen to ensuring a secure New Year's Eve in Las Vegas spans over two decades, starting with their first activation during the Y2K scare in 2000. This mission has persisted following the events of 9/11, showcasing their enduring dedication to the safety of the annual celebration.

Gen. Daniel Hokanson, chief, National Guard Bureau, attended the mission planning and implementation during the New Year’s celebration.

“This is just one example of how the National Guard integrates seamlessly with federal, state and local agencies, whether law enforcement or medical first responders, as is the case here in Las Vegas every year,” said Hokanson, the 29th chief of the National Guard Bureau. “The National Guard is always ready, always there in defense of our nation, states and territories.”

The Nevada Army National Guard’s 1st Squadron, 221st Cavalry, played a crucial role as the primary unit overseeing operations and personnel on the Strip New Year’s Eve. Additionally, the 92nd Civil Support Team provided atmospheric monitoring and on-site analytical analysis of suspicious substances.

The Nevada Air National Guard’s 152nd Medical Group supported two hospitals with approximately 35 personnel for triage assistance in case they were needed.
# All Michigan, all the time, for this operation in Liberia

/ Published Nov. 18, 2015

LANSING, Mich. — Members of the Michigan Army National Guard's 1430th Engineer Company arrived in Monrovia, Liberia, last week to begin a cooperative project with Liberian Engineers. 

 In a historic first, the engineers were transported by two KC-135s from the Michigan Air National Guard's Selfridge-based 127th Wing.

"This is a perfect case of a "Pure Michigan" operation," said Maj. Gen. Gregory Vadnais, adjutant general for the Michigan National Guard. "We used Michigan aircraft operated by Michigan Airmen to transport Michigan Soldiers to our partnership country of Liberia."  

The Michigan Guard is entering its fifth year of a State Partnership Program with Liberia. The 1430th is in Liberia on the first of several planned rotations of Michigan Guard engineers working alongside their Liberian counterparts to improve the living conditions; while there they will assist with the construction of new barracks buildings.  The Liberian Army has experienced considerable growth recently and is in need of increased lodging.

Getting the Soldiers from Michigan to Liberia was the first step in the process.

"There were a number of firsts with this mission (and) each presented its own challenge," said Maj. Leah Voelker, director of operations for the 171st Air Refueling Wing, and the project officer for the deployment.  

"We have never planned for an aircraft to actually land in an African country so getting clearance for aircraft and equipment was a new process for us.  We have flown over Africa for refueling operations but never landed on African soil before.  Liberia typically sees more tactical aircraft like C-130s and C-17s land but we could not find any record of a tanker landing before the Michigan KC-135s."    

The 1430th is no stranger to traveling overseas to train.  Two years ago they supported Operation Beyond the Horizon in Guatemala.  "Going to Guatemala in 2013 was much less stressful," said Sgt. Jessica Leahy, administrative officer for the 1430th. "Because we were replacing a unit already working on the project so many of the transportation systems were already in place.  This was the first unit in (Liberia) on this engineering project so we were figuring our systems as we went, kind of building the airplane as we fly it."  

Rotations of engineers are expected to continue into Liberia on and off through February of 2016.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-20189

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODNEY STUBBLEFIELD, also known as “Big”,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-194-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Stubblefield has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Stubblefield has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 7, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-20189 Document: 00513788536 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/07/2016
No. 16-20189

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-20189 Document: 00513788536 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/07/2016
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 67 (Wednesday, April 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18922-18923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08039]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Interest Rates

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the optional ``peg'' rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This 
rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for 
maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be 
used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. 
This rate will be 2.125 (2\1/4\) percent for the April-June quarter of 
FY 2015.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for 
any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the 
cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New 
York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted 
by the constitution or

[[Page 18923]]

laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate will be the rate 
permitted by the constitution or laws of the given State.

Linda S. Rusche,
Director, Office of Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-08039 Filed 4-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
#### Charles & Thomas Drayton *and others, vs.*Chandler Logan *and others.*

*Bill to foreclose a mortgage, executed in*1788. *Defendants offered evidence of various payments, soma of which were contested. and relied on the presumption of payment from lapse of time. The Circuit Court ordered an issue at law, to enquire-if any thing, and hoto much was due, which order was reversed on appeal.*,

*An order directing an issue, is a proper subject of appeal.*

Chancellor *Gaillard*

The complainants, as executors of their father, sold a house and lot in Broad street, to Dr. Chandler, and made him titles on the 22d April 1784, and Dr. Chand« ler mortgaged it to them in 1788, to secure the sum of4,347i. 10s. *9d.*which was divided into three equal parts, and for *68which bonds were given, bearing date with the mortgage, one of them to Charles, another to Thomas, and the third to Glen Drayton. The consideration expressed in the titles is 3,560 guineas. The bill is brought to foreclose the mortgage. The defendants say that the bonds are paid, and produce receipts for payments, ending in July, 1795: to Charles Drayton. of *£*2,292 9s. *6d.*to Glen Drayton *£*2,001 10s. to Thomas Drayton ¿£1,631 15. making *£*6,381 Os. *5d.*Some of these sums were paid between 1784, the date of the titles and 1788, the dates of the mortgage and bonds. Many of the payments are contested, and it is insisted for the complainants there is Still a balance due. The defendants rely as well on these payments as on the presumption of payment arising from length of time, to repel which, a number of facts and circumstances were adduced. These clearly form a subject peculiarly proper for the consideration of ajury. If the defence be sustained, then there will be an end of the claim; if not, it must bo ascertained what is due, and how much and on which of the bonds. If any thing be found due, then the other points made in the case will arise and require the consideration of the court. There being ho legal representative of Dr. Chandler against whom to bring suit, the complainants may bring it against the de-visees and legatees of Dr. Chandler, or such of them as arc in possession of the house and lot, and no objection shall be made to suit being thus brought, unless either of the defendants should before the suit is commenced, administer on Dr, Chandler’s estate. It is ordered that an issue be directed to the court of common pleas, to ascertain whether there be any thing due on the bonds of the complainants, and if any thing, how much and on which of them, and that the verdict of the jury be sent *to*this court.

.From this order complainants appealed, on the ground, amongst others, that the chancellor on circuit had determined incorrectly in sending the cause to ajury; whereas, it was submitted, that it was a lit subject of inquiry before the proper officer of this court, to whom questions of this kind are usually ¡referred. Decree affirmed by the wholb court,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,095
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                       462
<INVENTORY>                                     13,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,724
<PP&E>                                          38,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,650
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,411
<SALES>                                         23,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,822
<CGS>                                           23,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (3)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,923)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.00)
        


</TABLE>