alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2842 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2842

  To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of 
   Defense from requiring that members of the Armed Forces receive a 
               COVID-19 vaccine, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2021

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of 
   Defense from requiring that members of the Armed Forces receive a 
               COVID-19 vaccine, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Respecting Our Servicemembers Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON COVID-19 VACCINATION REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 1110b the following new section:
``Sec. 1110c. Prohibition on COVID-19 vaccination requirement
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense may not require any 
member of an Armed Force to receive a vaccine with respect to the 
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
    ``(b) Member of an Armed Force Defined.--In this section the term 
`member of an Armed Force' means a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, 
Marine Corps, Coast Guard, or Space Force, including any member of a 
reserve component thereof on active service or active status.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 1110b the following new item:

``1110c. Prohibition on COVID-19 vaccination requirement.''.
                                 <all>
```
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0481** Docket Number
**2011 -**  **SW -**  **003 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Apical Alert Service Bulletin No. SB2010 - 03, Revision C, dated December 21, 2011.


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOUR S OF:**  9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
# National Guard Bureau chief pens holiday message

/ Published Dec. 12, 2018

ARLINGTON, Va. – As we enter the holiday season, let's all take a moment to reflect on our accomplishments and achievements over the past year. This year, National Guard units supported emergency relief operations at home by responding to multiple disasters while other units remained engaged in the warfight.

 The success of our Nation's response continues to be the Citizen-Soldiers and Airmen of the National Guard.

 To the Guardsmen who are mobilized and deployed in support of our great Nation, I thank you for your service and look forward to your safe return home. To Guard families who patiently await the return of your loved ones, I thank you for your sacrifices and enduring support to your Soldiers and Airmen.

 As you enjoy your holiday season, remember to assist your fellow Guardsmen, civilian personnel, and families in staying safe. Indiscipline continues to be the leading cause in accidents, but you can make the difference. If you or someone you know needs help, reach out to friends, family, or organizations who can provide support and assistance.

 Thank you for your service and dedication to the National Guard. Have a safe and happy holiday season, and a successful new year!

Sincerely,

 Joseph L. Lengyel

General, U.S. Air Force

 Chief, National Guard Bureau
#### In the Matter of Eagle Insurance Company, Appellant, v State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al., Respondents.

[771 NYS2d 899]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated October 22, 2002, which denied the petition, confirmed the award, and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

“An arbitration award in a mandatory arbitration proceeding, such as this one, will be upheld if it is supported by the evidence and is not arbitrary and capricious” *(Matter of Sari M. Friedman, P.C. v Gleeson,*300 AD2d 404 [2002] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*89 NY2d 214, 223 [1996]; *Matter of Ryan & Henderson v Haviv,*309 AD2d 939, 940 [2003]). Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the arbitration panel’s determination was amply supported by the evidence in the record, and was not arbitrary and capricious *(see Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., supra).*S. Miller, J.P., H. Miller, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

C.W. Gilluly, Chief Financial Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the "Company")
certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB/A for year ended June 30, 2005 and
that to the best of his or her knowledge:

     1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.


January 19, 2007                        /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                        Principal Finance Officer
                                        (Chief Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) January 13, 2014











DENNY’S CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware0-1805113-3487402(State or other jurisdiction ofCommission File No.(I.R.S. EmployerIncorporation or organizationIdentification No.)





203 East Main Street


Spartanburg, South Carolina 29319-0001


(Address of principal executive offices)


(Zip Code)





(864) 597-8000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[    ]  Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[    ]  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[    ]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[    ]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














---










Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition





On January 13, 2014, Denny's Corporation issued a press release announcing certain preliminary financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 25, 2013. A copy of the press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto and incorporated herein by reference.








Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits





(d) Exhibits





Exhibit 99.1 -- Press release issued by Denny's Corporation on January 13, 2014.








---




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.











Denny's CorporationDate: January 13, 2014/s/  F. Mark WolfingerF. Mark WolfingerExecutive Vice President,Chief Administrative Officer andChief Financial Officer
# Jf**ourtl) Court** **of is>an** **Antonio, October** **21,2013 No.** **04-12-00833-CR Ramy** **A. SISY,** **Appellant v.** **The STATE** **of Texas,** **Appellee From** **the 399th** **Judicial District** **Court, Bexar** **County, Texas** **Trial Court** **No. 2010CR3763** **Honorable Juanita** **A. Vasquez-Gardner,** **Judge Presiding** **ORDER The** **State's brief** **was originally** **due to** **be filed** **with this** **court on** **September 11,** **2013. This** **court granted** **the State's** **first motion** **for an** **extension of** **time to** **file the** **brief until** **October**

### 11,**2013. On** **October 17,** **2013, the** **State filed** **its second** **motion for** **an extension** **of time** **to file** **its brief** **until November** **14, 2013,** **for total** **extension of** **sixty-four days.** **The State's** **motion is** **GRANTED. The** **State's brief** **must be** **filed with** **this court** **not**

### later**than November** **14, 2013.** **NO FURTHER** **MOTIONS FOR** **EXTENSION OF** **TIME TO** **FILE THE** **STATE'S BRIEF** **WILL BE** **GRANTED.**

# yWr**Patricia O.** **Alvarez, Justice** 

### IN**WITNESS WHEREOF,** **have hereunto** **set my** **hand and** **affixed the** **seal of** **the said** **court on** **this 2J$da^o$,Q£tober,** **2013.**

# '4V**OF****'*'"****Keith E.** **Mottle Clerk** **of Court**
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

** **

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

Board of Directors

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.

 

We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference in the previously filed Registration Statements (File Nos. 333-110189, 333-109778 and 333-173673) of our report datedApril 1, 2013 relating to the consolidated financial statements of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. as of and for the year ended December31, 2012, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

/s/ Kingery & Crouse, P.A.

Certified Public Accountants

Tampa, Florida

April 1, 2013
AIR-09-250-E 

August 25, 2010 

 Exemption No. 10123 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0445 

Mr. Jim Vanek 

Sport Copter, Inc. 

34012 Skyway Drive 

Scappoose, OR 97056 

Dear Mr. Vanek: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 5, 2009, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Sport Copter, Inc. for an exemption from §§ 21.191(i)(3) and 21.193(e)(1) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The proposed exemption, if granted, would 

allow Sport Copter, Inc. to produce and sell gyroplanes for certification under § 21.191(i) 

without previously having manufactured and assembled a gyroplane of the same make and 

model that has been issued a special airworthiness certificated in the light-sport category 

under § 21.190.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Sport Copter, Inc. 

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material 

respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 10099 (copy 

enclosed), the FAA did not believe it is in the public interest to permit a manufacturer to sell a 

make and model of gyroplane (or aircraft kit), eligible for the issuance of an experimental 

certificate in the light-sport category, if that manufacturer has not yet produced a gyroplane of 

that make and model that meets the accepted consensus standards. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

• they don’t differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial of 

exemption; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition Sport Copter, Inc. for an exemption from 

14 CFR §§ 21.191(i)(3) and 21.193(e)(1). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

K.C. Yanamura 

Acting Director, Aircraft Certification Service 

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
unaudited financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2000 that were
filed  with the company's report on Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         1
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001001907
<NAME> SPACEHAB, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,075
<PP&E>                                         215,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,676
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,892
<COMMON>                                        82,074
<OTHER-SE>                                          16
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,109
<SALES>                                        105,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,708
<CGS>                                           87,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,762)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,844)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,844)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRIC T 

## C OURT O F 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

_ __ __________________________ Cas e No. 5D23-1 042 LT Case No. 2018-CF-001358

_____________________________ M ARCUS Z OHRON M ORGAN , Appell ant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appell ee.

_____________________________ On appeal f

rom th e Circuit Court for Citrus County

. Joe l Fritton, J udge

. Ma rcus Z ohron Morgan , Carrabelle, p r o s e . N o Appearance for Appellee. Augus t 15, 2023
P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED . M AKAR , W ALLIS , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
# Guam Guard Helps Elementary School Recover from Typhoon

/ Published Feb. 15, 2024

DEDEDO, Guam – About 50 Soldiers and family members from the Guam National Guard’s Team Binadu gathered at Adacao Elementary School Feb. 3 with ladders, lawn tools, paintbrushes and a desire to serve. Led by Capt. Tom Borgonia and 1st Sgt. Rudel Retuyan, Team Binadu’s goal was to help the school pass an inspection that would allow it to reopen almost nine months after being damaged by Typhoon Mawar.

“We decided to do community service because it’s a way to give back, and it provides the opportunity to invite our families to join their spouses working together,” said Borgonia. “Focusing on schools will impact the community hopefully to reduce the number of schools having split sessions and transition back to normalcy.”

Borgonia and his troops belong to Bravo Company, affectionately known as Binadu — “deer” in the Chamoru Language — of the Guam National Guard’s 1-294th Infantry Regiment. They are mobilized full time under Task Force Talon of the 38th Air Defense Artillery Brigade to secure Guam’s Terminal High Altitude Area Defense defensive missile system.

“We are from the National Guard, but being activated under Task Force Talon provides us the flexibility to volunteer on weekends and represent ourselves as Team Binadu,” said Borgonia.

Binadu works with the Guam Department of Education to receive a list of schools that need assistance based on their inspection date to open or remain open.

Janice Chargualaf, principal of Adacao Elementary, expressed her gratitude for the Soldiers of Team Binadu. 

“They did an excellent job, and our community is pleased and happy with the work they did,” said Chargualaf. “It was nice to see everyone coming together, and we need more of that on the island, especially after the typhoon and with budget constraints. Binadu made it personal to me – we are one team and one Guam.”

Team Binadu painted, cleared vegetation and debris, replaced ceiling tiles and handled other chores. Many Soldiers brought their own equipment and tools and some brought their spouses, significant others, and children to help. 

“Reinspection is next week, and hopefully, it’ll be good news,” said Chargualaf. “We think we’re almost there and we’re excited. And the Guam Guard would be the reason why if we pass.”
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1466

CAROLYN R. STURGILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District

Judge. (CA-96-127-B)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 14, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carolyn R. Sturgill, Appellant Pro Se. David Marcellus Frazier,

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Julie

C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn R. Sturgill appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s

decision. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Sturgill v. Apfel, Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. CA-96-127-B

(W.D. Va. Feb. 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J.
Lennon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: December 10, 2004

/s/ John J. Lennon
_______________________

John J. Lennon
Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our report dated September 8, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Form10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of SPACEHAB, Incorporated on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-36779, effective November 3, 1997, FileNo. 333-43159, effective December 24, 1997, and File No. 333-43181, effective December 24, 1997) and Form S-4 (File No. No. 333-126772, effective September 6, 2005). 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Houston, Texas 

 

September 21, 2005