alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

AMERUS LIFE HOLDINGS, INC.
EXHIBIT 12 - STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
RATIO OF EARNINGS FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Years Ended December 31,
                                                                                  ------------------------
                                                        1998             1997             1996              1995             1994
                                                        ----             ----             ----              ----             ----
<S>                                                 <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>               <C>   
                                                                              (In thousands)
Earnings:
---------
Income before income taxes
  and accounting changes                            $ 91,251          $ 80,081         $118,032          $110,550          $ 26,131

Add, Combined Fixed Charges                          309,863            74,866           68,396            80,476            83,403
                                                    --------          --------         --------          --------          --------

Adjusted Earnings                                    401,114           155,047          186,428           191,026           109,534
                                                    ========          ========         ========          ========          ========
Fixed Charges:
--------------
Interest on indebtedness                            $ 14,784          $  7,961         $  2,142          $  2,356          $  5,356

Preferred stock dividends                             12,291             7,019                -                 -                 -

Interest credited to deferred
  annuities                                          282,788            59,886           66,254            78,120            77,980
                                                    --------          --------         --------          --------          --------

                                                    $309,863          $ 74,866         $ 68,396          $ 80,476          $ 83,403
                                                    ========          ========         ========          ========          ========
Ratio of Earnings to
  Combined Fixed
  Changes and Preferred
  Stock Dividends                                       1.29              2.07             2.73              2.37              1.31
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Lennon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuaNt to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ JOHN LENNON
John Lennon
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 8, 2005
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jon A. DeLuca, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 9, 2004
EX-23.1



CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 [File No.s 333-214553, 333-214554, and 333217963]
of our report dated March 29, 2019 with respect to the audited consolidated financial statements of Protagenic Therapeutics, Inc.
for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern.



|/s/
    MaloneBailey, LLP | 
|------------------------- | 
|www.malonebailey.com      | 
|Houston,
    Texas        | 
|July
    3, 2019          |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7885
KENNETH E. JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus C. JOHNSON, Nurse, Defendant - Appellee, and S. K. YOUNG, Warden of Operations; A. P. HARVEY, Assistant Warden of Operations, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1205-7) Submitted: April 12, 2004 Decided: April 29, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth E. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Elizabeth Kay Dillon, GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Kenneth E. Jackson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant Carolyn Johnson and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeJackson v. Johnson , No. CA-02-1205-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-12295

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:06-cr-00049-SLB-RRA-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LARRY JERRELL SMITH,

a.k.a. Andre Williams,

a.k.a. Andre Woods,

a.k.a. Andre Smith,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________

(March 5, 2013)

Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges

Case: 12-12295 Date Filed: 03/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory J. Reid, counsel for Larry Jerrell Smith in this appeal of the 

revocation of Smith’s supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further 

representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of 

the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the 

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no 

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s 

revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-12295 Date Filed: 03/05/2013 Page: 2 of 2
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CEDRIC C. MITCHELL,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2015-7084

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 13-3389, Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law Offices of Carpenter 

Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant. 

JEFFREY LOWRY, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented 

by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR.,

MARTIN F. HOCKEY; BRIAN D. GRIFFIN, MARTIN JAMES 

SENDEK, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and STOLL,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 12, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
& b 8

6 œ

> œ>œ> œ.> Allegro

f

œ œ

>œ>#œ.> nœ œ>œ>œ> œ> œ>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m.100, 2nd beat

fi

J

œ

^ ‰ ‰ Œ. 8 5 8

13

8

21

8

29

& b Œ j

œ

.

œ

. œ

.

œ

.

37

F

Str. Mute

 ̇. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ.  ̇. 4

Œ j

œ

.

œ

. œ

.

œ

.

45

F

 ̇. Œ j

œ

. œ. œ

. œ. j

œ

.

‰ ‰ Œ. ‰ œ

.

œ

. œ.

& b Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. 3 53

œ

.

œ

.

œ

. œ. ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. !

61

& b ‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ! ‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ j

œ

.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. Œ jœ

. œ

. œ

. œ

.

69 Open

p

& b  ̇. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ.  ̇. 4

Œ j

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

.

77

p

 ̇. Œ j

œ

. œ. œ

. œ. j

œ

.

‰ ‰ Œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Official Song of the National Guard Bureau

2nd Bb Trumpet Words and Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

40th Army Band, VTARNG

& b ‰ œ

.

œ

. œ. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. 85 3

œ

.

œ

.

œ

. œ. ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ.

& b  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. ! 93‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ! ‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ j

œ

.  ̇.

& b

fi

j

œ ‰ ‰

œ.

>

Ceremonial version,

from m.4

f

 ̇.

>

101

œ. œ.

>  ̇.

>

j

œ ‰ ‰ œ

- œ œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>  ̇.

>

109

& b œ. œ

- œ œ œ. œ. œ ‰ œ

- œ- j

œ

- œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>  ̇.

>

117

œ j

œ

> œ

>

j

œ

>

& b  ̇.

> œ ‰ œ

- œ- j

œ

- œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>  ̇.>

125

œ œ

> œ> œ> œ> œ>  ̇.

>

& b j

œ ‰ ‰ œ

>

j

œ

- œ.

> œ.> œ.> œ.> œ.

> œ

> œ>

ƒ 2

œ.

> œ

> œ>

2

œ

> J

œ

> œ

> œ>

2 j

œ

v

‰ ‰ Œ.

2 ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

- 2nd Bb Trumpet-
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     LINENS 'N THINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                             COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF
                            EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
           ($ in thousands, except Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       FISCAL YEAR
                                                   ----------------------------------------------------
                                                     1999       1998       1997       1996      1995
                                                   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                                <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
NET EARNINGS

Net income (loss) ..............................   $ 52,052   $ 38,062   $ 25,790   $ 15,039   $    (34)

Income taxes ...................................     32,457     23,843     18,704     10,952      1,108

Interest expense, excluding capitalized interest        554        594      1,405      4,692      7,059

Portion of rents deemed representative
   of interest factor (1/3) ....................     33,737     27,819     23,271     17,774     12,946
                                                   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
                                                   $118,800   $ 90,318   $ 69,170   $ 48,457   $ 21,079
                                                   ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
FIXED CHARGES
Gross interest expense .........................   $  1,070   $    774   $  1,574   $  4,692   $  7,059

Portion of rents deemed representative
   of interest factor (1/3) ....................     33,737     27,819     23,271     17,774     12,946
                                                   --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
                                                   $ 34,807   $ 28,593   $ 24,845   $ 22,466   $ 20,005
                                                   ========   ========   ========   ========   ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES .............       3.41       3.16       2.78       2.16       1.05

</TABLE>
_________________________________________________________________ 

_________________________________________________________________ 

Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCOT-16-0000788 

02-DEC-2016 

03:30 PM 

SCOT-16-0000788
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

MAUNA KEA ANAINA HOU and KEALOHA PISCIOTTA; CLARENCE KUKAUAKAHI


CHING; FLORES-CASE 'OHANA; DEBORAH J. WARD; PAUL K. NEVES;


and KAHEA: THE HAWAIIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE, a domestic nonprofit corporation, Petitioners-Appellants,
 

vs.
 

BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF HAWAII;


DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF HAWAII;


SUZANNE CASE, in her official capacity as Chair


of the Board of Land and Natural Resources and
 

Director of the Department of Land and Natural Resources;


and UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT HILO, Respondents-Appellees,
 

and
 

TMT INTERNATIONAL OBSERVATORY, LLC; HARRY FERGERSTROM;


MEHANA KIHOI; C.M. KAHO'OKAHI KANUHA; JOSEPH KUALI'I LINDSEY
 

CAMARA; J. LEINA'ALA SLEIGHTHOLM; MAELANI LEE; THE TEMPLE OF


LONO; KALIKOLEHUA KANAELE; PERPETUATING UNIQUE EDUCATIONAL


OPPORTUNITIES, INC.; STEPHANIE-MALIA TABBADA; TIFFNIE KAKALIA;


GLEN KILA; DWIGHT J. VICENTE; BRANNON KAMAHANA KEALOHA;


CINDY FREITAS, AND WILLIAM FREITAS, Intervenors-Appellees. 


APPEAL FROM THE BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES
 

(BLNR-CC-16-002 (Agency Appeal))
 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and


Circuit Judge Nishimura, in place of Nakayama, J., recused)
 

Upon consideration of (1) respondent-appellee Board of
 

Land and Natural Resources, State of Hawai'i’s motion to dismiss 

appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction, filed on November 10,
 
 

 

2016, (2) respondent-appellee University of Hawai'i at Hilo’s 

motion to dismiss appeal of lack of appellate jurisdiction, filed 

on November 14, 2016, (3) intervenor-appellee TMT International 

Observatory, LLC’s joinder to respondent-appellee University of 

Hawai'i at Hilo’s motion to dismiss appeal of lack of appellate 

jurisdiction, filed on November 14, 2016, (4) petitionersappellants Mauna Kea Anaina Hou and Kealoha Prisciotta, Clarence 

Kukauakahi Ching, Flores-Case Ohana, Deborah J. Ward, Paul K. 

Neves, and Kahea: The Hawaiian Environmental Alliance’s 

(collectively, “Appellants”) opposition to the motions to dismiss 

and joinder, filed on November 18, 2016, (5) the respective 

supporting documents, and (6) the record herein, it appears that 

this court lacks jurisdiction over Appellants’ appeal. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for 

lack of appellate jurisdiction.1 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, December 2, 2016. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
 

/s/ Rhonda A. Nishimura


1
 As this court does not have jurisdiction over the appeal, all other
 

requests for relief are dismissed. 


2
# Utah Air National Guard medical unit conducts joint search, rescue training

/ Published Dec. 9, 2016

SALT LAKE CITY - November kicked off two major training events for the 151st Medical Detachment-1, the medical portion of the Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Enhanced Response Force Package here. 

These exercises are a joint Utah Army and Air National Guard team that responds to mass-casualty events and provides search and extraction, decontamination, medical treatment and stabilization, as well as fatality remains recovery.

The first training event was accomplished in Idaho and centered on field casualty care in conjunction with wide area search and recovery operations. Twelve members of the Davis County Sheriff Department's Search and Rescue team conducted training with the 151st Det-1. This training provided by the 151st Det-1 members enhanced the medical skills of the SAR team while familiarizing them with their equipment. Also in attendance were two members of the 934th Field Surgical Team and one member of the 171st Medical Evacuation unit.

In turn, Davis County SAR provided wide area training to the 151st Det-1 members and increased valuable team skills in the event of a natural disaster affecting large populations.

Air Force Staff Sgt. Eric Bornemeier, head of the CERFP team and lead planner for the exercise, has coined this type of training as "cross pollination".

"In my opinion, that is what the Guard is all about; Citizen-Airmen serving their communities," said Bornemeier, who is also the commander of the Davis County Sheriff's SAR team.

The second training event conducted by the 151st Det-1 was held at Roland R. Wright Air National Guard Base in Salt Lake City, and included a site visit to the University of Utah's Burn Center. The training started with a lecture by the U of U Burn Center's subject matter expert, Anette Matherly, in the auditorium of building 210, with civilian providers from the U of U, Air Med, 934th FST, 171st MedEvac unit, and 151st Det-1 members in attendance.

After the lecture, the teams practiced burn scenarios on the 151st Det-1's patient simulator. Training continued with load and unload procedures (cold and hot engine) on the 171st MedEvac's UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters

The trainees then relocated to the University's Burn Center for more burn care protocol instruction. U of U team members who attended the morning lectures were now teaching their military classmates on U of U burn treatment equipment and procedures - effectively generating more cross pollination among participants!

In all, 151st Det 1 personnel were able to facilitate training of 12 Davis County Sherriff Search and Rescue members, six members of U of U Burn Center, 10 members of the 934th FST, 12 members of the 171st Medevac team, and 45 members from 151st Det-1. In return, the 151st Det-1 members were able to glean valuable skills from the training provided by civilian and Army response partners.
1 ,. 

3 

. 4 

NEYER USE FOR APPROYALS, DISAPPRONLS. 

'CONCURRENCES, OR. SlllflLAR .ACTIONS 

INITIALS 

DATE 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACflON 

NOTE AND 

RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-08-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526 
"'• .. ' . REL ID i..A67517 CONFfiuENTiAL 

16 November 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF OF STAFF 

SUBJECT: Review of "064" Operation in PROD 

1. Several years have passed since the unit currently designated 

as the Technical Support Group in PROD (NSA-064) was established. It 

is possible that the reasons which were then deemed sufficient to 

warrant the establishment of such a group are no longer applicable, 

and that the basis for the continuance of the group, when the matter 

is considered from the viewpoint of efficiency in administration as 

well as in technical operations, no longer exists. 

2. It is therefore suggested that the D/D PROD be requested to 

review the situation with respect to NSA-064 in collaboration with the 

Chief, Personnel Division and perhaps also with the Comptroller, with 

a view to (1) ascertaining the advantages and disadvantages of continuing 

the existence of the Technical Support Group, and (2) if continua.nee is 

warranted, ma.king appropriate recommendations in the premises, including, 

if deemed advisable, recormnendations for changes in the present arrangements relative to that Group. 

9-JJ~o:- a:a--~ WILLI.AM F. FRIEDMAN 

Special Assistant 

CONFIDENTIAL
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Richard J. Gaynor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



Date: November 5, 2009/s/ RICHARD J. GAYNOR Richard J. Gaynor Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks