alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Good Neighbor Environmental Board

Agenda

Thursday, March 22, 2012

12:00 (EST) Welcome and Introductions

 Mark Joyce, Associate Director

GNEB Acting Designated Federal Officer

 Cynthia Jones-Jackson, Acting Director

U.S. EPA Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach

 Diane Austin, Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

 Board Members and Speakers

12:30 – 12:40 Overview of Agenda

 Diane Austin, Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

12:40 – 12:55 Department of Interior’s WaterSMART Program – Colorado River Study

 Carly Jerla, Co-Study Manager

Bureau of Reclamation

12:55 – 1:15 Environmental Flows and the SB 3 Process 

 Ron Ellis, Manager Water Rights Permitting & Availability Section Water 

Availability Division

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

1:15 – 1:30 NGO Perspective and Commentary

 Mary Kelly, Environmental Analysis and Advocacy

Parula, LLC

1:30 – 1:50 Discussion

1:50 – 2:10 Border Environment Cooperation Commission and Water Infrastructure 

Overview and Projects

 Maria Elena Giner, General Manager

Border Environment Cooperation Commission
2:10 – 2:20 Break

2:20 – 4:20 Report out from Workgroups on 15th Report

2:20 – 2:30 Context – Timothy Trevino

2:30 – 2:40 Water Supply – Sally Spener

2:40 – 2:50 Water Quality – David Henkel

2:50 – 3:00 Water Treatment – Robert Apodaca

3:00 – 4:20 General Discussion – Entire Board

4:20 – 4:30 Public Comments

4:30 – 5:00 Board Business

 Membership Recruitment

 June Meeting Discussion

 Interaction with Congress

5:00 Adjourn
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason W. Rees,
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ JASON W. REES
Jason W. Rees
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
May 4, 2005
EXHIBIT 23.1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
PharmaNetics, Inc. (formerly Cardiovascular Diagnostics, Inc.) on Forms S-8
(File Nos. 333-32901, 333-32901-99 and 333-68357) of our report dated February
23, 1999 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and the
consolidated financial statement schedule of PharmaNetics, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 26, 1999
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

 

# Independent Auditors’ Consent

 

 

 

The Board of Directors

Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc.

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-57567) and in theregistration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-21247, 333-57717, 333-69442 and333-58430) of Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc. of our report dated February 6,2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Sanchez ComputerAssociates, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and the relatedconsolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and othercomprehensive income, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2002 andthe related consolidated financial statement schedule, which report appears inthe December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Sanchez ComputerAssociates, Inc.

 

Our report refers to our audit of theadjustments that were applied and disclosures that were added to revise the2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements, as more fully described inNote 2 to the consolidated financial statements.  However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply anyprocedures to the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements other thanwith respect to such adjustments and disclosures.

 

 

 
|   | /s/ KPMG LLP |
|--------|--------------|

 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 31, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          59,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,839,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    292,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,549,684
<PP&E>                                       5,211,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                 537,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,560,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,940,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,778,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,560,005
<SALES>                                     17,921,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,921,447
<CGS>                                       17,455,579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,455,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               114,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                379,198
<INCOME-TAX>                                   136,623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            242,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   242,575
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OLXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of SPACEHAB, Incorporated (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the report), I, Michael E. Kearney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ Michael E. Kearney           
|Michael E. Kearney, President and
|Chief Executive Officer          
|January 13, 2006                 



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
# 146th Airlift Wing Deploys for Operation Enduring Sentinel

/ Published Dec. 23, 2022

PORT HUENEME, Calif. – Members of the 146th Airlift Wing said goodbye to their families and friends before deploying for up to six months to support Operation Enduring Sentinel in Africa.

The deployment marks a shift for wing members as they transition from supporting operations in the Middle East to operations in the Horn of Africa.

“We’re going to be shifting gears from the old Air Expeditionary Force (AEF) deployment model to the new Air Force Force Generation (AFFORGEN) deployment model,” said Master Sgt. Adria Hadlock, a unit deployment manager for the 146th Airlift Wing.

The new model aims to move the Air Force’s personnel, aircraft and equipment into sections that train and deploy together as units move through each phase of the cycle in the AFFROGEN model.

“As we’ve slowly seen the shutdown of combat operations over there in Iraq and Afghanistan, it freed up resources to help us focus on operations in the Horn of Africa,” said Capt. Sean Ongley, an intelligence officer with the 146th Airlift Wing. “Africa has always been vital to U.S. interests. It is a critical strategic part of the world.”

Africa is important to world commerce because a lot of shipping moves through there. Lately, it has become a highly contested area due to the presence of several extremist groups.

“There’s long been an insurgent presence in the Horn of Africa from groups such as Al-Shabab to Isis. There are a lot of efforts to combat piracy there, as well,” said Ongley. “A lot of the host nation governments there are struggling to contain the extremists within their country, so it’s a good opportunity for the U.S. to work with their partners and help them combat those issues.”

The deployers will play a paramount role, helping to move supplies and troops within the area and perform other necessary tasks.

“I think it’s great that as an Air National Guard unit that we can support the Air Force mission as a whole and play a part in that,” said Ongley. “It’s a great opportunity for the unit to apply their operational experience and to do the mission out there.”

Hadlock said the deployers had almost two full months of additional required training, including a Tactical Combat Casualty Care course, Fieldcraft Hostile Environment training, and Evasion and Conduct After Capture training, all between holidays and other training requirements.

“It was a grueling schedule for the deployers and for those trying to push them through. It was a collaborative effort from the whole base to get them all ready. I’m proud that we were able to help them get all their requirements met and that everyone was able to get out the door on time,” said Hadlock.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN COLBERT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 181 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-1569

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Jose Candaneda-Lopez, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 6, 2001 Filed: September 12, 2001

___________ Before McMILLIAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jose Candaneda-Lopez pleaded guilty to producing fraudulent immigration documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1546(a). He later moved to withdraw the plea, contending that he did not fully understand the consequences of pleading guilty, or his plea agreement, due to his unfamiliarity with the English language. The district court 1 denied the motion and sentenced Candaneda-Lopez to 41 months imprisonment and three years supervised release.-2-

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Can daneda-Lopez’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. At the guilty plea hearing, where the plea agreement was reviewed point by point, Candaneda-Lopez was assisted by counsel and a translator. He repeatedly assured the court that he understood the proceeding and the plea agreement and that he would not be able to withdraw his plea if he later changed his mind. Further, he conceded at sentencing that he had understood the court’s admonition about withdrawing his plea, and admitted that he had changed his mind about pleading guilty because he was concerned about his family and hoped t o be able to get a lighter sentence. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e); UnitedStates v. Bahena , 223 F.3d 797, 806-07 (8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1163 (2001). Accordingly, his guilty plea should stand.
As part of his plea bargain, Candaneda-Lopez waived his right “to appeal or to contest, directly or collaterally, his conviction or sentence on any ground, unless the Court should impose a sentence in violation of the law apart from the sentencing guidelines.” The circumstances surrounding his guilty plea, which we have carefully examined, demonstrate to our satisfaction that Candaneda-Lopez knowingly and voluntarily made this plea-agreement promise not to appeal. See UnitedStates v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1070 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam). Accordingly, we enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss this appeal. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.-3-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<Page>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                      CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge,
that the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-K, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the registrant.





                               /s/ KARI STEFANSSON
                     --------------------------------------
                               Dr. Kari Stefansson
                     President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: March 15, 2004





                               /s/ LANCE THIBAULT
                     --------------------------------------
                                 Lance Thibault
                     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



Dated: March 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
furnished to deCODE genetics, Inc. and will be retained be deCODE genetics, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41356

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BETH LINETTE THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:97-CR-41

- - - - - - - - - -

July 16, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Beth Linette Thomas has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. Thomas’

motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 24.5


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints each of Glenn P. Dickes, Joseph P. Page, Christopher M.R. Phillips
and Barry F. Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
PANAVISION INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the 
Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the
undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to
the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in
connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 16th
day of March 1999.

                                          /s/ JAMES R. MAHER
                                          ---------------------------
                                          James R. Maher
EXHIBIT 99.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Sr. Vice President of C&M Management Inc., and Directory of Accounting of Boston Capital Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                  | Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership
|----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                  |                                                      
|                  | By:                                                  
|                  |                                                      
|                  |                                                      
|                  | By:                                                  
|                  |                                                      
|                  |                                                      
|                  | By:                                                  
|                  |                                                      
|                  |                                                      
|Date:             |                                                      
|November 20, 2002 | By:                                                  
|                  |                                                      
|                  |                                                      
|                  |
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3634 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3634

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 109 Main Street in Swifton, Arkansas, as the ``George Kell Post 
                               Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 2009

    Mr. Berry (for himself, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Ross, and Mr. Snyder) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 109 Main Street in Swifton, Arkansas, as the ``George Kell Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE KELL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 109 Main Street in Swifton, Arkansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George Kell Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George 
Kell Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
October 27, 2015 

Dear Mr. Timothy Ford: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−2795). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 11/10/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst