alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cattle Inventory

July 1, 2017

Executive Briefing

July 21, 2017

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service
Survey Overview

July Cattle

Data collection period June 30 – July 13

Sample size 9,910

Collection methods Mail, telephone, internet, face-to-face interview

Primary data items Total inventory, inventory by class, 

calf crop, and cattle on feed

July 21, 2017
U.S. Cattle Inventory July 1

Items 2015

(1,000 head)

2017

(1,000 head)

Percent 

of 2015

All cattle and calves 98,200 102,600 104

All cows and heifers that have calved 39,800 41,900 105

Beef cows 30,500 32,500 107

Milk cows 9,300 9,400 101

All heifers 500 pounds and over 15,700 16,200 103

For beef cow replacement 4,800 4,700 98

For milk cow replacement 4,200 4,200 100

Other heifers 6,700 7,300 109

Steers 500 pounds and over 14,100 14,500 103

Bulls 500 pounds and over 1,900 2,000 105

Calves under 500 pounds 26,700 28,000 105

Calf crop – annual 34,087 36,300 106

All cattle on feed 12,100 12,800 106

July 21, 2017
U.S. Calf Crop

Period 2015 2016

Preliminary

2017 

(1,000 head)

Percent 

of total (1,000 head)

Percent 

of total (1,000 head)

Percent 

of total

January 1 – June 30 24,650 72.3 25,550 72.8 26,500 73.0

July 1 – December 31 9,437 27.7 9,533 27.2 9,800 27.0

Total 34,087 35,083 36,300

July 21, 2017
95

100

105

110

1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

Million head

Year

95.7

104.8

102.9

102.6

July 21, 2017

U.S. All Cattle and Calves

July 1, 1997 - 2017
29

30

31

32

33

34

35

1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

Million head

Year

U.S. Beef Cows

July 1, 1997 - 2017

29.8

33.3

33.2 32.5

July 21, 2017
U.S. Cattle on Feed on July 1

July 21, 2017

Item 2015

(1,000 head)

2017

(1,000 head)

Percent of 

2015

Capacity of 1,000 head or more 10,236 10,821 106

Percent of total 84.6% 84.5%

Capacity of less than 1,000 head 1,864 1,979 106

Percent of total 15.4% 15.5%

All cattle on feed 12,100 12,800 106
U.S. Feeder Cattle Supply on July 1

Item 2015

(1,000 head)

2017

(1,000 head)

Percent of 

2015

Calves under 500 pounds 26,700 28,000 105

Steers and other heifers 500 pounds and over 20,800 21,800 105

Total supply 47,500 49,800 105

All cattle on feed 12,100 12,800 106

Feeder cattle supply 35,400 37,000 105

July 21, 2017
Upcoming NASS Reports

Release Date Report Title

July 31 Agricultural Prices

August 1 Cotton System

Fats & Oils

Flour Milling

Grain Crushings

Honey Bee Colonies

August 3 Farm Production and Expenditures

Land Values

August 10 Crop Production

August 18 Milk Production

August 22 U.S. and Canadian Cattle

U.S. and Canadian Hogs

August 24 Livestock Slaughter

August 25 Cattle on Feed

July 21, 2017
All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

(202) 720-3570

(800) 727-9540

nass@nass.usda.gov

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

July 21, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3206 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 168
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3206

To repeal the provisions of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 
  that impose new information reporting requirements with respect to 
                        digital asset transfers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2021

 Mr. Cruz introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                           November 16, 2021

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provisions of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 
  that impose new information reporting requirements with respect to 
                        digital asset transfers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF NEW INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WITH 
              RESPECT TO DIGITAL ASSET TRANSFERS.

    (a) In General.--The amendments made by section 80603 of the 
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act are repealed and the provisions 
of law amended by such section are restored as if such section had 
never been enacted.
    (b) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall take 
effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                                       Calendar No. 168

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 3206

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To repeal the provisions of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 
  that impose new information reporting requirements with respect to 
                        digital asset transfers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 16, 2021

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3633 

To allow the funding for the interoperable emergency communications grant 

program established under the Digital Television Transition and Public 

Safety Act of 2005 to remain available until expended through fiscal 

year 2012, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2009 

Ms. HARMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To allow the funding for the interoperable emergency communications grant program established under the Digital 

Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 

to remain available until expended through fiscal year 

2012, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PUBLIC SAFETY INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICA4 TIONS GRANTS. 

5 (a) Notwithstanding section 3006(a)(2) of the Digital 

6 Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 (47 

7 U.S.C. 309 note), sums made available to administer the 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3633 IH

1 Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grant Pro2 gram under section 309(j)(8)(E) of the Communications 

3 Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(8)(E)) shall remain avail4 able until expended, but not beyond September 30, 2012. 

5 (b) The period for performance of any investment ap6 proved under the Program as of the date of enactment 

7 of this Act shall be extended by one year, but not later 

8 than September 30, 2011, except that the Assistant Sec9 retary of Commerce for Communications and Information 

10 may extend, on a case-by-case basis, the period of per11 formance for any investment approved under the Program 

12 as of that date for a period of not more than 2 years, 

13 but not later than September 30, 2012. In making a deter14 mination as to whether an extension beyond September 

15 30, 2011, is warranted, the Assistant Secretary should 

16 consider the circumstances that gave rise to the need for 

17 the extension, the likelihood of completion of performance 

18 within the deadline for completion, and such other factors 

19 as the Assistant Secretary deems necessary to make the 

20 determination. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
unaudited financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2000 that were
filed  with the company's reprot on Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         1
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
ROOSEVELT BONNER, JR.,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2874

Opinion filed May 5, 2017.

Amended Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Roosevelt Bonner, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief - Criminal 

Appeals, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The amended petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits. 

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 30 

To set forth a method of determining maximum out-of-pocket limits and 

annual updates to premium tax credit eligibility under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2021 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To set forth a method of determining maximum out-of-pocket 

limits and annual updates to premium tax credit eligibility under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Indexing for 

5 Health Care Affordability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT PERCENTAGE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1302(c)(4) of the Patient 

8 Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 30 IS

1 18022(c)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘calendar year)’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘calendar year, based on estimates and projec3 tions of changes for the applicable year in the average per 

4 enrollee employer-sponsored insurance premiums provided 

5 by the National Health Expenditure Accounts)’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

 
 



 
 April 26, 2013 
 Mtro. Emilio R. Lozoya Austin 
 Director General 

Petróleos Mexicanos 
 Av. Marina Nacional
No. 329 
 Col. Petróleos Mexicanos 
 Torre Ejecutiva Piso 44 
 11311 México D.F., México 

Dear Mtro. Lozoya Austin: 
 We
hereby consent to the references to Ryder Scott Company, L.P. as set forth under the heading “Exploration and Production (Reserves)” in the annual report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the
“Form 20-F”) and to the filing as an exhibit to the Form 20-F our report describing our review of the estimates of proved oil, condensate, natural gas and oil equivalent reserves owned by the United Mexican States (“Mexico”) as
of December 31, 2012, for 308 located onshore in and offshore from Mexico in the Northern Region. These estimates were prepared in accordance with the applicable reserves definitions of Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission. 
  

	
	




	RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
	TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580


 Houston, Texas 
 April 26, 2013 
  

							
	SUITE 600, 1015 4TH STREET S.W.	  	CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4	  	TEL (403) 262-2799	  	FAX (403) 262-2790
	621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550	  	DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501	  	TEL (303) 623-9147	  	FAX (303) 623-4258
----

|                    | WESTSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |                                    |   |   |   |
|                    |                                    |   |   |   |
| Date: November 12, 2010 |                                    | By:    | /s/    Randall C. Hall |   |
|                    |                                    |   |   |   |
|                    |                                    |   | Randall C. Hall |   |
|                    |                                    |   | President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                    |                                    |   | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |   |

----
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LINDSEY LICARI, Appellant,

vs. NIKKI SIKALIS BOTT; NATIONAL TITLE CO.; LINDA NAW-PERDUE; ERA BROKERS; VALLEY WEST MORTGAGE; DREW LEVY; ONE REALTY GROUP; MELISSA PARKER; MELANIE TREANOR; GREATER LAS VEGAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS; THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, REAL ESTATE DIVISION; LINDA STRATTON; INGRID TRUJILLO; DARYL MCCLOSKY; VATCHE SAJIDIAN; CLARK COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE; THE STATE OF NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE; LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; JENNINGS AND FULTON, LTD.; AND SHUMWAY VAN LTD., Res ondents. No. 82568

J ï 

# D

SEP 2 1 2021

ELiZABE1 ciar-AVN CLERK OF S • EWE COURT

1319.4CV—

PUTY CLEO.K.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order dismissing claims and declaring appellant to be a vexatious litigant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; David M. Jones, Judge.

On March 18, 2021, the clerk of this court issued a notice directing appellant, who is proceeding pro se, to file and serve, by July 16, 2021, either (1) a brief that complies with NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or (2) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk. The notice cautioned that failure to timely file a brief or an informal brief could



## '-14Mresult in the dismissal of this appeal. Appellant did not file a brief or an informal brief or otherwise communicate with this court. Accordingly, on August 11, 2021, this court entered an order directing appellant to file and serve, by August 25, 2021, either (1) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or (2) an informal brief for pro•se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court. The order cautioned that failure to timely file and serve an opening brief or an informal brief could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. See NRAP 31(d).

To date, appellant has not filed an opening brief or an informal brief or otherwise communicated with this court. Accordingly, it appears that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

• 2§.

Cadish

Herndon

2 C, 44-aw-cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge Lindsey Licari Attorney General/Carson City Lipson Neilson P.C. Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP/Las Vegas Clarkson & Associates, LLC Marquis Aurbach Coffing Drew Levy Linda Stratton Murchison & Cumming, LLC/Las Vegas Shumway Van Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas Clark County District Attorney Resnick & Louis, P.C./Las Vegas Vatche Sajidian Valley West Mortgage Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 1947A Olagto 3

• vtri jr i :f - -
EX-10.57



 Exhibit 10.57 

Summary of Compensation Package for Mr. Raymond Land 
 On June 14, 2012 the board of directors (the “Board”) of BioAmber Inc. (the “Company”) approved the following compensation package for Mr. Raymond Land for his service as an
independent director of the Board, Chairman of the Board and a Chairman of a committee of the Board: 
  

	 	a.	an annual fee of $85,000; and 

  

	 	b.	a stock option grant every two years of 10,500 options per year to be made at the anniversary dates of the initial election of the concerned board member.


 Previously, on November 3, 2011, the Board approved a grant of options to Mr. Land to purchase 17,500 shares of the
Company’s common stock pursuant to the Company’s stock option plan at an exercise price of $28.49 per share, such options vesting over two years; 50% as of November 4, 2012 and 50% as of November 4, 2013. 

Mr. Land does not have a written agreement with respect to director compensation.
# Iowa National Guard, Kosovo celebrate long partnership

/ Published Dec. 1, 2021

DES MOINES, Iowa – It was a red carpet affair that resembled a family reunion. Kosovo Security Force members, Iowa National Guard leaders, dignitaries, and government officials gathered the evening of Nov. 6 in the extravagantly decorated Des Moines Area Community College ballroom in Ankeny.

The handshakes and hugs were those of close friendships and partnerships forged over many years.

It was part of a celebration of the 10-year formal partnership between the Iowa National Guard and Kosovo under the State Partnership Program. In 2011, Maj. Gen Timothy Orr, former adjutant general of the Iowa National Guard, vied for Iowa to be a part of this National Guard Bureau program that pairs state National Guards with partner countries to support security cooperation objectives and increase military capability.

However, the Iowa and Kosovo relationship began before then. From 2003 to 2011, approximately 800 Iowans deployed in rotations to Kosovo as part of Operation Joint Guardian. After a time of great adversity, including a humanitarian crisis as a result of an armed ethnic conflict in the region, Iowans came as part of a peacekeeping force. They worked together with Kosovars to recover and rebuild, and many even spent personal time engaging in nation-building activities such as teaching English and community improvement projects.

Those relationships at the community level carried on. They led to more dedicated bonds and broader interests for formal collaboration, including the establishment of sister city partnerships between Iowa and Kosovo cities and the establishment of the first foreign consulate in Iowa.

The deeply intertwined relationship between Kosovo and Iowa was on display at the formal ball.

Special guests and representatives took turns on stage, with the Iowa and Kosovo flags as a backdrop, and told anecdotes about the relationships and visions for the partnership’s future.

Donika Gervalla-Schwarz, deputy prime minister/minister of foreign affairs, shared stories of personal tragedy and loss and how the partnership with Iowa has been part of the foundation of a bright future for Kosovo.

The hope is that this will continue and evolve for the mutual benefit of Iowa, Kosovo and the world community. If this past year’s milestone of the Kosovo Security Force and Iowa National Guard deploying together to Kuwait to support peace in other nations is any indication, it looks likely.

But as Maj. Gen. Ben Corell, adjutant general of the Iowa National Guard, said: “I don’t hope for anything, I believe. And I believe this relationship is enduring. Leadership will change, but I believe this relationship will continue to grow.”
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6705

TYRONE SHELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE; GENE M. JOHNSON, Deputy Director of the VDOC; GARY BASS, Chief of Operations for the VDOC; RICHARD A. YOUNG, Western Regional Director for the VDOC; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden for Red Onion State Prison; YVONNE ELSWICK, Assistant Warden of Programs, ROSP; OPERATIONS OFFICER FOR ROSP; J. BENTLEY, Treatment Program Supervisor at ROSP; R. ROWLETTE, Major, Chief of Security at ROSP; L. FLEMING, Captain of Security of ROSP; D. TAYLOR, Captain of Security at Wallens Ridge State Prison; R. PIENTKA, Sergeant; M. MULLINS; DOCTOR NWAUCHE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Pamela Meade Sargent, Magistrate Judge. (CA-99-750-7) Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 30, 2002 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; David Ernest Boelzner, Heather Marie Kofron, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). 3 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Shelton appeals the magistrate judge’s and district court’s orders denying relief in part on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s and district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge and district court. SeeShelton v. Angelone , No. CA-99-750-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2000; Mar. 22, 2001; filed Mar. 27, 2002 and entered Mar. 28, 2002). In addition, we note that the district court’s opinion on Shelton’s ADA claim is consistent with our recent decision in Wessel v. Glendening , F.3d , 2002 WL 31121398 (4th Cir. Sept. 26, 2002) (No. 00-6634). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Grant Miller, certify that:

To
the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2003 by USA
Broadband, Inc. and to which this certification is appended (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of USA Broadband, Inc.

|Date: May 20, 2003 |  | /s/GRANT MILLERGrant Miller
Principal Executive Officer
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks