alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 891st Engineer Battalion trains with Kuwaiti soldiers

/ Published Oct. 26, 2020

KUWAIT – The 891st Engineer Battalion experienced a remarkable opportunity to train side by side with Kuwait Land Force troops Oct. 4-15.

The Joint Combat Engineer training provided effective combat preparation for each Soldier.

Approximately 30 Soldiers from the Forward Support Company (FSC), Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 168th Engineer Construction Company (ECC), and 1023rd Vertical Engineer Company, (EVCC) traveled to the Land Forces Institute in Kuwait to rebuild fighting trenches and provide basic instruction on the proper ways to build fighting position.

The KLF’s fighting positions are based on British doctrine.

With the guidance of British Warrant Officer Class 2 Andrew “Axel” Foley, the 891st Engineer Battalion and Kuwait Land Force troops rebuilt six positions in 10 days.

After decades of use in the harsh environment, the positions were worn down.

Soldiers from both forces began by removing the existing sandbags surrounding the positions, then dug out the sand-filled trenches. The Soldiers replaced the sandbags with fresh ones and coated them with a concrete mix to slow the deterioration from the sun.

“It is a very positive experience; they are very engaging,” said Foley.“It builds a strong partnership between the two nations and it allows them to share their resources and capabilities, so then they can improve and learn from both on the U.S. side and the Kuwait side.”

“Working with the Kuwaitis was a good experience overall. I personally enjoyed it, and we accomplished what we set out to do,” said Sgt. Jeremy Blevins, 891st HHC Engineer Battalion.

Soldiers from Task Force Iron Castle and Task Force Tornado will continue to partner with Kuwaiti Land Force troops for more joint training opportunities throughout the month.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, David Campbell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Safe Idea, Inc.; on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10QSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Safe Idea, Inc..



By:


David Campbell

Title: Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>                              5
  <LEGEND>
   This schedule contains summary financial information primarily extracted from
   Capita Preferred Trust's audited consolidated income statement and balance
   sheet as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 1997 and is
   qualified in its entirety by reference to such audited consolidated
   financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

   <S>                                 <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                DEC-31-1997
   <CASH>                                0
   <SECURITIES>                          0
   <RECEIVABLES>                         0
   <ALLOWANCES>                          0
   <INVENTORY>                           0
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0<F2>
   <PP&E>                                0
   <DEPRECIATION>                        0<F1>
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                  206,186
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0<F2>
   <BONDS>                               0
   <COMMON>                          6,186
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
   <PREFERRED>                     200,000
   <OTHER-SE>                            0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    206,186
   <SALES>                               0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                 18,680
   <CGS>                                 0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                  18,680
   <INCOME-TAX>                          0
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>              18,680
   <DISCONTINUED>                        0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
   <CHANGES>                             0
   <NET-INCOME>                     18,680
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                         0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                         0

   <FN>
*  In accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(c) 2, inapplicable or immaterial
   financial data is reflected as zero value.

<F1>   - Accumulated depreciation relates to equipment under operating leases.

<F2>   - This item is not applicable since the Company does not prepare a
          classified balance sheet.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Filed 12/10/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2013 ND 224

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Scott Alvin Rau, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20130187

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Christine Hummert McAllister, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.

Steven Balaban, 200 North Mandan Street, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant; on brief.

State v. Rau

No. 20130187

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Scott Alvin Rau appeals from a criminal judgment following a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of  N.D.C.C. § 19- 03.4-03.  On appeal, Rau argues there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict.  We summarily affirm the district court’s criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Summary of Change-of-Control Arrangement with Bob Watts 
 Bob Watts
currently serves as an executive officer of MicroStrategy Incorporated (“MicroStrategy” and, collectively with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), and is one of MicroStrategy’s “named executive officers” as defined
in Item 402 of Regulation S-K. In connection with the commencement of Mr. Watts’s employment with the Company in January 2008, the Company issued, and Mr. Watts accepted, an offer letter providing, among other things, that
Mr. Watts is entitled to receive $250,000 if there is a change of control of MicroStrategy and immediately following the change of control Mr. Watts suffers a material reduction in his responsibilities, duties, and compensation under the
offer letter.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER ATTESTATION

Of Hull Energy, Inc.
a Nevada corporation

FOR THE SHAREHOLDER VOTE

Held on: December 4, 2012


Effective Date:		December 4, 2012

WHEREAS, the undersigned is an executive officer of Hull Energy, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation;

WHEREAS, the undersigned attests to the following:

ATTESTED, that Hull Energy, Inc. underwent a special vote of the
shareholders on December 4, 2012;

ATTESTED, that Hull Energy received votes from over 51% of the equity
interest of the company, which consisted of a vote of all outstanding
Preferred A shares, Preferred D shares, and six million of its common
shares held by Jeff Canouse, in favor of the acquisition of Title King,
LLC, a privately held Georgia Limited Liability Company.

ATTESTED, that the votes received were cross-matched and verified
against the books and records of Hull Energy, Inc. for shareholders
of good title.

ATTESTED, that such information regarding the acquisition shall be
made public through a filing of a Form 8-K with the Securities
Exchange Commission.

HEREBY ATTESTED TO, the Executive Officer hereby affirms the
hereto:

Dated: dated as of the Effective Date


HULL ENERGY, INC.

/S/JEFFREY CANOUSE
By: Jeffrey Canouse, President and CEO
#### Peaceman v. Tedesco

On June 13, 1977, plaintiffs filed with the administrator a complaint against defendants Orlando P. Tedesco, M.D., Edwin W. Shearburn, III, M.D. and The Lankenau Hospital. On June 28, 1977, preliminary objections of Dr. Edwin W. Shearburn and The Lankenau Hospital (hereinafter defendants) were filed in the nature of a petition raising the question of venue. On July 15, 1977, plaintiffs’ answer to defendants’ preliminary objections was filed and both parties have submitted a memorandum of law in support of their respective positions.

The complaint, alleging that medical malpractice was committed on wife-plaintiff at The Lan-kenau Hospital, is captioned: “In the City of Philadelphia.” Although The Lankenau Hospital has a Philadelphia mailing address it is located in Montgomery County. Therefore, defendants are correct that there is no venue in Philadelphia County and defendants’ preliminary objections are sustained. However, defendants’ request that plaintiffs’ complaint be dismissed for lack of venue will not be granted. Pa.R.C.P. 1006(e) provides for transfer of the action to the appropriate county in lieu of dismissal. It should also be noted that the designation of the county in which the cause of *639action arose is required by our rules of practice only for the purpose of designating venue if an appeal is taken to the court of common pleas. Therefore, we issue the following

ORDER

And now, August 9, 1977, upon consideration of the preliminary objections of defendants, Dr. Edwin W. Shearburn, III and The Lankenau Hospital, plaintiffs’ answer to defendants’ preliminary objections, and the memoranda of law submitted by the respective parties, it is hereby ordered and decreed that defendants’ preliminary objections are sustained, and henceforth all legal papers filed with the administrator in this action shall designate in the caption Montgomery County as the county in which the alleged cause of action arose.
Exhibit 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Cash Technologies, Inc.
Los Angeles, California

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration
statement  No.  333-413536  on  Form  S-3,  the  registration   statements  (No.
333-117252  and  333-90680)  on  Form  SB-2  and  the  registration   statements
(333-114789,  Nos.  333-90664 and 333-72654) and on Form S-8 of our report dated
August 25,  2004  relating  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of Cash
Technologies,  Inc. as of May 31, 2005 and for the year then ended, which report
is  included  in this  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB.  Our report  contains  an
explanatory paragraph regarding Cash Technologies Inc's ability to continue as a
going concern.


Los Angeles, California
September 13, 2005


                                       94
##### 



Exhibit 10.24
 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE
 Assignment 27 Assignor Assignee
 RECITALS
 Landlord Lease Exhibit A Exhibit B
    AGREEMENT
     signatures appear on the following page(s)
 1




---



##### 



ASSIGNOR
 
 By:
    
    /s/ Michael OBrienName:
    
    Michael OBrien;Title:
    
    CFO
 ASSUMPTION
  ASSIGNEE:PYRAMID BREWERIES INC.,a Washington corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Scott BarnumName:
    
    Scott BarnumTitle:
    
    CEO
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                          45,751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    342,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               430,678
<PP&E>                                         314,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 679,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          249,298
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           396
<OTHER-SE>                                     383,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   679,916
<SALES>                                      1,300,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,300,632
<CGS>                                          772,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  443,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 84,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,457
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,052
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,052
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          24,919
<SECURITIES>                                   406,954
<RECEIVABLES>                                  435,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,893)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           6,460
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,773)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 891,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           444
<OTHER-SE>                                     315,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   891,672
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,763
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   219
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,262
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,433
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jon A. DeLuca, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of its annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:

a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: April 2, 2007



/s/    JON A.
DELUCAJon A. DeLuca President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3215 

To amend the Act of August 10, 1956, to provide for the payment of 

pay and allowances for certain officers of the Army who are assigned 

to the Corps of Engineers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2021 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. MANCHIN, and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of August 10, 1956, to provide for the 

payment of pay and allowances for certain officers of 

the Army who are assigned to the Corps of Engineers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘USACE Military Per5 sonnel Augmentation Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3215 IS

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CERTAIN 

2 OFFICERS FROM APPROPRIATION FOR IM3 PROVEMENTS. 

4 Section 36 of the Act of August 10, 1956 (70A Stat. 

5 634, chapter 1041; 33 U.S.C. 583a), is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘Regular officers of the Corps 

7 of Engineers of the Army, and reserve officers of the 

8 Army who are assigned to the Corps of Engineers,’’ 

9 and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The personnel described in sub11 section (b)’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(b) PERSONNEL DESCRIBED.—The personnel re14 ferred to in subsection (a) are the following: 

15 ‘‘(1) Regular officers of the Corps of Engineers 

16 of the Army. 

17 ‘‘(2) The following members of the Army who 

18 are assigned to the Corps of Engineers: 

19 ‘‘(A) Reserve component officers. 

20 ‘‘(B) Warrant officers (whether regular or 

21 reserve component). 

22 ‘‘(C) Enlisted members (whether regular or 

23 reserve component).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Machine, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
for the period  ending  September  30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Daniel L.  Hodges,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
Chief Executive Officer
February 13, 2003
March 20, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Delivery of Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc.'s Operating Documents [Docket No. 

FAA-2015-0268]

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this office represents Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. ("Rimkus"), regarding the 

above referenced Petition for Exemption, in which Rimkus seeks regulatory relief to allow commercial 

operation of small unmanned aerial vehicles. Please accept this letter as confirmation that the following 

operating documents, which contain proprietary information, were hand-delivered to Jake J. Troutman, 

Program Analyst, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Safety, Airmen and Airspace Rules 

Division, on March 19, 2015:

 Rimkus Consulting Group sUAS Aircraft Flight Manual 

 Rimkus Consulting Group sUAS Flight Operations Manual

If you have any other questions, or need any additional information to process this exemption 

request, please contact the undersigned or John McGraw at:

 John McGraw Aerospace Consulting, LLC

Phone: 540-219-1638

Email: john@jmacaerospace.aero

Very truly yours, 

Matthew J. Clark

Mark E. McKinnon

 

 Counsel for Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc.

Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com

Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336.8714

Matthew J. Clark

703.336.871

Email Address

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0695. IN THE INTEREST OF N. L. et al., CHILDREN.

On August 11, 2016, this Court granted an application for discretionary appeal

filed by the mother and father, which sought review of the trial court’s order

terminating their parental rights. The order directed them to file a notice of appeal

within 10 days of the date of the order. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). Fifteen days later,

on August 26, 2016, the mother and father filed their notice of appeal.

The timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer

jurisdiction on this Court. White v. White, 188 Ga. App. 556, 556 (373 SE2d 824)

(1988). Because the mother and father failed to file a notice of appeal within 10 days

of our order granting the discretionary application, the notice of appeal is untimely.

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 07, 2016

12/07/2016