Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 19635 

7See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe 

From Mexico, 57 FR 42953 (September 17, 1992). 

1See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From Taiwan; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013, 79 FR 60449 (October 7, 2014) (Preliminary 

Results). 

2See the January 15, 2015, memorandum to Gary 

Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations 

through Irene Darzenta Tzafolias, Acting Director, 

Office II from David Crespo, Senior International 

Trade Compliance Analyst, entitled ‘‘Narrow 

Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.’’ 

3See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic 

of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 

FR 56982 (Sept. 17, 2010) (Order). 

4For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see the memorandum from James P. Maeder, 

Senior Director, Office I, Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. 

Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Continued 

publication date of these final results of 

administrative review, consistent with 

section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash 

deposit rate for Productos Laminados 

will be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this review, which is listed 

above; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not 

participating in this review, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate established from 

a completed segment of this proceeding 

for the most recent review period; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 32.62 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.7 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APOs) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 8, 2015. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of the Order 

Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: The Department Should Grant a 

CEP Offset Adjustment to Normal Value 

Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–08430 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–844] 

Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From Taiwan; Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 7, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the Preliminary 

Results of the third administrative 

review of the antidumping duty (AD) 

order on narrow woven ribbons with 

woven selvedge (NWR) from Taiwan.1

The review covers two producers/

exporters of the subject merchandise: 

King Young Enterprise Co., Ltd. and its 

affiliates, Ethel Enterprise Co., Ltd. and 

Glory Young Enterprise Co., Ltd., 

(collectively, King Young); and Hen Hao 

Trading Co. Ltd. a.k.a. Taiwan Tulip 

Ribbons and Braids Co. Ltd. (Hen Hao). 

The period of review (POR) is 

September 1, 2012, through August 31, 

2013. We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Results and, based upon our 

analysis of the comments, we continue 

to find that sales of subject merchandise 

to the United States have been made at 

prices below normal value (NV). The 

final dumping margins for the reviewed 

companies are listed below in the 

section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the 

Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective date: April 13, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Crespo or Alice Maldonado, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3693 and (202) 

482–4682, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 7, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results in the 

Federal Register. The Department 

conducted a sales verification of King 

Young at its offices in Taiwan from 

September 29 through October 3, 2014, 

and a cost verification from November 

12 through 16, 2014. In January 2015, 

we received case briefs from Berwick 

Offray LLC and its wholly-owned 

subsidiary Lion Ribbon Company, Inc. 

(the petitioner), King Young, and Morex 

Ribbon Corp. and Papillon Ribbon & 

Bow Inc., importers of subject 

merchandise. Also in January 2015, we 

received rebuttal briefs from the 

petitioner and King Young. On January 

15, 2015, the Department postponed the 

final results by 60 days.2 The 

Department has conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to this 

order 3 covers narrow woven ribbons 

with woven selvedge. The merchandise 

subject to this order is classifiable under 

the harmonized tariff schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) statistical 

categories 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030; 

5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject 

merchandise also may enter under 

subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20; 

5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00; 

5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10; 

5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80 

and under statistical categories 

5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080; 

5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. The 

HTSUS statistical categories and 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes; 

however, the written description of the 

merchandise covered by this order is 

dispositive.4

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

19636 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 

Enforcement and Compliance, entitled, ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review on 

Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from 

Taiwan (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated 

concurrently with and hereby adopted by this 

notice. 

5On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references in the 

Department’s regulations can be found at 79 FR 

69046 (November 20, 2014). 6See Order, 75 FR 56985. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues which parties raised 

and to which we respond in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

to this notice as Appendix I. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s AD 

and Countervailing Duty (CVD) 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS).5 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and in the Central 

Records Unit, room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we made changes to 

the margin calculations for King Young. 

For further discussion, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. We made 

no changes to the rate assigned as 

adverse facts available (AFA) to Hen 

Hao in these final results. 

Period of Review 

The POR is September 1, 2012, 

through August 31, 2013. 

Final Results of the Review 

We are assigning the following 

dumping margins to the firms listed 

below: 

Producer/exporter 

Dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

King Young Enterprise Co., 

Ltd./ .......................................

Glory Young Enterprise Co., 

Ltd./ .......................................

Ethel Enterprise Co., Ltd. Taiwan ........................................ 30.64 

Hen Hao Trading Co. Ltd. 

a.k.a. Taiwan .........................

Tulip Ribbons and Braids Co. 

Ltd. ........................................ 137.20 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the 

Department has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise and deposits of estimated 

duties, where applicable, in accordance 

with the final results of this review. The 

Department intends to issue appropriate 

assessment instructions directly to CBP 

15 days after publication of the final 

results of this administrative review. 

For King Young, the Department will 

calculate importer-specific assessment 

rates equal to the total amount of 

dumping calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales and the total entered 

value of those sales. Where an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the 

Department will instruct CBP to 

liquidate these entries without regard to 

antidumping duties pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2). 

For Hen Hao’s U.S. sales, we will base 

the assessment rate assigned to the 

corresponding entries on the AFA rate 

listed above. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: 1) the 

cash deposit rates for Hen Hao and King 

Young will be equal to the dumping 

margins established in the final results 

of this administrative review; 2) for 

merchandise exported by manufacturers 

or exporters not covered in this 

administrative review but covered in a 

prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently-completed segment; 3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recentlycompleted segment of this proceeding 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and 4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 4.37 

percent, the all-others rate determined 

in the LTFV investigation.6 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 6, 2015. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Margin Calculations 

4. Scope of the Order 

5. Discussion of the Issues 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices 19637 

1The Department published its preliminary 

results for this administrative review in Certain 

Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary 

Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; Calendar Year 2012, 79 FR 60447 (October 

7, 2014) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated 

September 30, 2014 (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

2AR Printing is also known as A.R. Printing & 

Packaging (India) Pvt. Ltd. 

3See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results of Countervailing Duty Review: Certain 

Lined Paper Products from India’’ from Christian 

Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul 

Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance (Decision Memorandum), dated 

concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice. 

4See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China: 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the 

People’s Republic of China; and Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 

(September 28, 2006) (Lined Paper Order). 

5See Preliminary Results. 

6See the Department’s October 10, 2014, Third 

Supplemental Questionnaire to the GOI. 

7See the GOI’s October 31, 2014, Third 

Supplemental Questionnaire Response. 

8See Memorandum to Eric B. Greynolds, Program 

Manager, AD/CVD Duty Operations, Office III, 

‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Responses 

Submitted by the Government of India,’’ (March 4, 

2015). 

9Petitioner is the Association of American School 

Paper Suppliers (Petitioner). 

10See Petitioner’ March 11, 2015, case brief. 

11See the GOI’s March 16, 2015, rebuttal brief. 

12On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

13See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

Continued 

a. The Appropriate Unit of Measure On 

Which to Base Sales and Cost Data for 

King Young 

b. Limiting the Model Matching 

Methodology for Width and Length 

c. Allegation That King Young’s Piece 

Sales Are Outside the Ordinary Course of 

Trade 

d. Allegation That King Young’s Channel 3 

Sales Are Outside the Ordinary Course of 

Trade 

e. Level of Trade for King Young 

f. Clerical Error in King Young’s 

Preliminary Dumping Margin 

g. King Young’s Unaffiliated Suppliers’ 

Cost of Production 

h. General and Administrative Expense 

Ratio for King Young 

i. Financial Expenses for King Young 

j. Labor and Overhead Ratios for King 

Young 

k. King Young’s Allocation of Fixed 

Overhead Costs 

l. AFA Rate for Hen Hao 

6. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–08436 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–844] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Final Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; Calendar 

Year 2012 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) completed the 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

certain lined paper products from India 

for the January 1, 2012, through 

December 31, 2012, period of review 

(POR) 1 in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). The respondent in 

this administrative review is A.R. 

Printing & Packaging India Private 

Limited (AR Printing).2 In these final 

results, the Department made changes to 

the subsidy rate determined for AR 

Printing. Our analysis of comments 

received is contained in the Decision 

Memorandum accompanying this 

Federal Register notice.3 The final net 

subsidy rate for AR Printing is listed 

below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ 

section. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 

482–1009. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 28, 2006, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register the CVD order on certain lined 

paper products from India.4 On October 

7, 2014, the Department published the 

Preliminary Results of administrative 

review of the Lined Paper Order for the 

POR.5

After the Preliminary Results, we 

issued a third supplemental 

questionnaire providing the 

Government of India (GOI) with an 

opportunity to describe the steps on 

which it based its claims that AR 

Printing did not use certain subsidy 

programs at issue in the review,6 to 

which the GOI responded on October 

31, 2014.7 On March 4, 2015, we 

conducted verification at the GOI offices 

in New Delhi, India.8

Petitioner 9 submitted a case brief on 

March 11, 2015,10 and the GOI 

submitted a rebuttal brief on March 16, 

2015.11 No interested party requested a 

hearing. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is certain lined paper products. The 

products are currently classifiable under 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) item numbers: 

4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 

4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 

4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 

4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 

4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 

4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 

4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

product description remains dispositive. 

A full description of the scope of the 

order is contained in the memorandum 

from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul 

Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

‘‘Countervailing Duty (CVD) 

Administrative Review: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India.’’ The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS).12 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and is available to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Methodology 

The Department has conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). For each of the 

subsidy programs found 

countervailable, we find that there is a 

subsidy, i.e., a government-provided 

financial contribution that gives rise to 

a benefit to the recipient, and that the 

subsidy is specific.13

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES