19070 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 

4 Id., and 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing 

requirements). 

5See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

6See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

7For a full discussion of this clarification, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 

8The all-others rate established in Urea From the 

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 52 

FR 19557 (May 26, 1987). 

9 Id. 

1See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review and Extension of 

the Final Results, 79 FR 69424 (November 21, 2014) 

(Preliminary Results). 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of authorities.4

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

the Department’s electronic records 

system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern 

Time within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.5 Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. Issues raised in 

the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case briefs. 

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of the issues raised in any 

written briefs, not later than 120 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, the Department 

shall determine and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. If EuroChem’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis in 

the final results of this review, we will 

calculate an importer-specific 

assessment rate on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of antidumping 

duties calculated for each importer’s 

examined sales and the total entered 

value of such sales in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If EuroChem’s 

weighted-average dumping margin 

continues to be zero or de minimis in 

the final results of review, we will 

instruct CBP not to assess duties on any 

of its entries in accordance with the 

Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., 

‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin 

of dumping for the exporter is 

determined to be zero or de minimis, no 

antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 6

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003.7 This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by EuroChem 

for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States. In such instances, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate of 64.93 

percent 8 if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 15 days after publication of the 

final results of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of solid urea 

from Russia entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for EuroChem will be the 

rate established in the final results of 

this administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by manufacturers 

or exporters not covered in this review 

but covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding; 

(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

in this review, a prior review, or the 

original investigation but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the 

manufacturer of the merchandise for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (4) the cash deposit rate for 

all other manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 64.93 percent.9 These 

cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 2, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

A. Summary 

B. Background 

C. Scope of the Order 

D. Comparisons to Normal Value 

1. Determination of Comparison Method 

2. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

E. Product Comparisons 

F. Date of Sale 

G. Constructed Export Price 

H. Normal Value 

1. Home Market Viability as Comparison 

Market 

2. Level of Trade 

3. Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Comparison Market Prices 

I. Currency Conversion Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–08207 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–601] 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Notice of Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 21, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the changed circumstances 

review (CCR) of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on tapered roller bearings 

and parts thereof, finished and 

unfinished (TRBs), from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC).1 We gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

For these final results, as in the 

Preliminary Results, we determine that: 

(1) Shanghai General Bearing Co., Ltd. 

(SGBC/SKF) is the successor-in-interest 

to a company of the same name 

(hereinafter known as SGBC), a 

producer/exporter of TRBs revoked from 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 19071 

2See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Revocation in Part 

of Antidumping Duty Order, 62 FR 6189 (February 

11, 1997) (SGBC Revocation). 

3See Antidumping Duty Order: Tapered Roller 

Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 

Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China, 

52 FR 22667 (June 15, 1987). 

4See SGBC Revocation, 62 FR at 6214. 

5See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s 

Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review, 78 FR 38943 (June 

28, 2013). 

6See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 69424–25. 

7 Id. at 69425. 

8See letter from Irene Darzenta Tzafolias, Acting 

Director, Office II, AD/CVD Operations, to SGBC/

SKF, dated January 29, 2015. 

9See the memorandum from Gary Taverman, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance entitled, ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review 

Requested by Shanghai General Bearing Co, Ltd.: 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

10On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of the Enforcement 

and Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized 

Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and 

CVD Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). The Web site location was changed from 

http://iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. 

The final rule changing the references in the 

Department’s regulations can be found at 79 FR 

69046 (November 20, 2014). 11See, e.g., Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy: 

Notice of Final Results of Changed Circumstances 

Antidumping Duty Review, 71 FR 24643 (April 26, 

2006) (where the Department applied the changed 

circumstances determination retroactively because 

the company in question was excluded from the AD 

order). 

the AD order on TRBs from the PRC in 

1997; 2 and (2) merchandise from SGBC/ 

SKF is not subject to the AD order on 

TRBs from the PRC. 

DATES: Effective: August 1, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen Banea, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0656. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 15, 1987, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD order on TRBs from the PRC.3 On 

February 11, 1997, the Department 

revoked the order on TRBs from the PRC 

with respect to merchandise produced 

and exported by SGBC, effective as of 

June 1, 1994.4

Effective August 1, 2012, the majority 

shareholder of SGBC merged with AB 

SKF (SKF) and, as a result of the merger, 

SGBC became part of the SKF Group. 

On February 13, 2013, SGBC/SKF 

requested that the Department conduct 

a CCR pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3)(ii) to determine whether it 

is the successor-in-interest to SGBC as it 

existed prior to its affiliation with SKF, 

and on June 28, 2013, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice initiating a CCR to address this 

question.5

On November 21, 2014, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register the notice of preliminary 

results of this CCR.6 In the Preliminary 

Results, we provided all interested 

parties with an opportunity to comment 

and request a public hearing regarding 

our preliminary finding that SGBC/SKF 

is the successor-in-interest to SGBC; at 

that time, we also extended the final 

results in this CCR.7

On December 12, 2014, SGBC/SKF 

and Stemco LP (Stemco), a U.S. 

manufacturer and importer of TRBs 

from the PRC, submitted case briefs. On 

December 19, 2014, SGBC/SKF 

submitted a rebuttal brief. On January 

16, 2015, the Department held a public 

hearing at the request of Stemco. On 

January 29, 2015, we extended the final 

results in this CCR to no later than April 

1, 2015.8

Scope of the Order 

Imports covered by the order are 

shipments of tapered roller bearings and 

parts thereof, finished and unfinished, 

from the People’s Republic of China; 

flange, take up cartridge, and hanger 

units incorporating tapered roller 

bearings; and tapered roller housings 

(except pillow blocks) incorporating 

tapered rollers, with or without 

spindles, whether or not for automotive 

use. These products are currently 

classifiable under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

item numbers 8482.20.00, 8482.91.0050, 

8482.99.15, 8482.99.45, 8483.20.40, 

8483.20.80, 8483.30.80, 8483.90.20, 

8483.90.30, 8483.90.80, 8708.70.6060, 

8708.99.2300, 8708.99.4850, 

8708.99.6890, 8708.99.8115 and, 

8708.99.8180. Although the HTSUS 

item numbers are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this CCR are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum,9 which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. A list of the 

issues which parties have raised, and to 

which we have responded in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, is attached 

to this notice as Appendix I. 

The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s AD and 

Countervailing Duty (CVD) Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS).10

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit 

(CRU), Room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, parties can obtain a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum on the internet at http:// 

trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

In the Preliminary Results, we found 

SGBC/SKF to be the successor-ininterest to SGBC because the 

information on the record indicated that 

SGBC/SKF continued to operate as 

essentially the same entity that was 

effectively revoked from the order as of 

June 1, 1994. In reaching this 

determination, we considered changes 

in SGBC’s operations covering the 

period from revocation through August 

1, 2012, with respect to several factors, 

including the following: (1) 

Management; (2) production facilities; 

(3) supplier relationships; and (4) 

customer base. After analyzing the 

comments received, and for the reasons 

stated in the Preliminary Results and 

discussed further in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, we continue to 

find that SGBC/SKF is the successor-ininterest to SGBC. As a result of this 

determination, we find that SGBC/SKF 

is entitled to SGBC’s revoked status. 

Consequently, the Department will 

apply this determination retroactively 

and will instruct U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection to liquidate, without 

regard to antidumping duties, all 

unliquidated entries entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse on or after 

August 1, 2012, the date of SGBC/SKF’s 

accession into the SKF Group, in 

accordance with past practice.11

Notification 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
19072 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 

1For a full description of the scope of the order, 

see the memorandum from Gary Taverman, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary Enforcement 

& Compliance, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary 

for Enforcement & Compliance, ‘‘Decision 

Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland’’ 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is 

dated concurrently with this notice, and is hereby 

incorporated by reference. A list of the topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum appears in Appendix I of this notice. 

2See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

3See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

4See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

5See 19 CFR 351.303. 

6See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.216 and 

351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: April 1, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of the Order 

Discussion of the Issues 

1. The Time Period Examined 

2. Whether the Department Should 

Distinguish Between Incremental vs. 

Rapid Changes 

3. Changes to the Four Factors Considered 

in Successor-in-Interest Determinations 

Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–08222 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–405–803] 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From 

Finland; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

Ashland Specialty Ingredients, a 

division of Hercules Inc., (Petitioner), 

and CP Kelco Oy (CP Kelco), the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on purified 

carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from 

Finland. The period of review (POR) is 

July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. The 

review covers one respondent, CP 

Kelco. We preliminarily find that sales 

of the subject merchandise by CP Kelco 

have not been made at prices below 

normal value (NV) during the POR. We 

invite interested parties to comment on 

these preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 9, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is all purified CMC, sometimes also 

referred to as purified sodium CMC, 

polyanionic cellulose, or cellulose gum, 

which is a white to off-white, non-toxic, 

odorless, biodegradable powder, 

comprising sodium CMC that has been 

refined and purified to a minimum 

assay of 90 percent. The merchandise 

subject to the order is classified in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States at subheading 

3912.31.00.1

Methodology 

The Department is conducting this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Export price and 

constructed export price are calculated 

in accordance with section 772 of the 

Act. NV is calculated in accordance 

with section 773 of the Act. For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Internet at 

http://www.enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

The signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine the following 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 

2014. 

Exporter/manufacturer Margin 

(percent) 

CP Kelco Oy ................................. 0.00 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

The Department intends to disclose to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

preliminary results within five days of 

the date of publication of this notice.2

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit cases 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed no later 

than five days after the date for filing 

case briefs.3 Parties who submit case 

briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of authorities.4

Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed 

using ACCESS.5 An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by ACCESS, by 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the date the document 

is due. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

the Departments electronic records 

system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern 

Time within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.6 Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. Issues raised in 

the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case briefs. If a 

request for a hearing is made, parties 

will be notified of the date and time for 

the hearing to be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230. 

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of the issues raised in any 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES