alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April9, 2014 Docket No. F AA-2013-0855 Case No. 2012-GL-25-0058

To His Honor, Judge J.E. Sullivan; 

# RECEIVED APR 16 2014 HEARING DOCKET

Inregards to the above mentioned case, I respectfully request a hearing to take place in Cleveland, Ohio. At this hearing I also request that Ms. Chris Paucho, the Flight Standards District Office Chief, also be present, along with FAA counsel Kate Barber as well as my representing council, ifnecessary. I do notfeel that the previous options offered byMs. Barber presented adequate opportunity to effectively answerthe allegations presented against me.
Inregardsto the FAA's Complaint dated January 30, 2013, my Answers are as follows: *Paragraph 1) Admit *Paragraph 2) Denied *Paragraph 3) Denied *Paragraph4) Lack ofKnowledge *Paragraph 5) Denied *Paragraph 6) Denied

Ithas always beenmy sole intentto promote the sport ofskydiving, as well as aviation, in a positive and safety conscious manner. I feel I have done this by having completed in excess of8,000 Tandem and AFF skydives as a USPA licensed instructor with never an accident, incident nor complaint filed against me. I would, again, request a hearing inmy home state so as to defend my integrity as well as my safety consciousness inthis matter.
Respectfully,

# JJ~tl~ David A. DravesApril9, 2014 Docket No. FAA-2013-0855 Case No. 2012-GL-25-0058

CERTIFIED and FIRST CLASS MAIL Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Ave., SW Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 Attn. Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430

Ms. Kate Barber Office ofRegional Counsel Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East DevonAvenue Des Plaines, IL 60018
Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, D.C. 20590
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001106205
<NAME>     Malacology, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      1000
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3124 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3124

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to repeal the requirement 
                     for unique health identifiers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 2021

  Mr. Paul (for himself and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to repeal the requirement 
                     for unique health identifiers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Patient ID Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR UNIQUE HEALTH IDENTIFIERS.

    Section 1173(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2(b)) 
is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 of Xinhua China Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Xianping Wang, President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
- The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 			   Dated: May 15, 2007                                                                     /s/ Xianping Wang                                                                                                                      Xianping Wang, President, CEO			                                                                                                   and a Director
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON DC

Wayne 

### R. Messinger, ) ) Complainant )


### v. Clover Acquisition Corporation d/b/a Pearland Regional Airport, Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) FAA Docket 

### No. 16-15-01



### NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above

-referenced complaint, fi led in accordance with 

### FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-AssistedAirport Enforcement Proceedings , 14 CFR , Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B , the date by which the Director's Determinat i on will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to April 1 , 2016. An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

fin ' 

### c g 1ce of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis Da te

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY C ERT IFY that on February 3 , 2016 , I caused to be placed in the U nited States mail (first class mail , postage paid) a true copy of the FAA's Request for Additional Information and Notice o f Extens ion ofTime, addressed to: 

### FOR COMPLAINANT Wayne R
. Me s singer P 0 Box 1710 Friendswood , Texas 77549 Ginevan4 @ gmail.com


### FOR RESPONDENT JAMES 

### F. P AR.KER, III Texas State Bar No. 24027591 j parker @ lglawfirm.com JOSE E
. de Ia FUE NTE Texas State Bar No. 00793605 jdelafuente @ lglawfirm.com SHEILA B. GLADSTONE Texas State Bar No. 07993550 sgl adstone @ lglawfirm.com LLOYD GOSSELINK ROCHE LLE & TOWNSEND, P
. C. 816 Congress A venue , Suite 1900 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 322-5800 Facsimile: (5 1 2) 472-0532 Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis , ACO-l 00

Office of Airport Compliance

and Management Analysis
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3625 

To provide for the Secretary of Education to study and report on the 

marketing of foods and beverages in elementary and secondary schools. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York (for herself and Mr. PLATTS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To provide for the Secretary of Education to study and 

report on the marketing of foods and beverages in elementary and secondary schools. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food Marketing in 

5 Schools Assessment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT ON FOOD MARKETING. 

7 (a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Education 

8 shall conduct a study on the extent and types of marketing 

9 of foods and beverages in elementary and secondary 

10 schools. In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall colVerDate Nov 24 2008 03:46 Sep 23, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3625.IH H3625

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3625 IH

1 laborate with, and include information from, the Division 

2 of Adolescent and School Health of the Centers for Dis3 ease Control and Prevention. 

4 (b) ASSESSMENT OF NUTRITION.—The study re5 quired by subsection (a) shall assess the nutritional qual6 ity of the types of foods and beverages marketed in 

7 schools. 

8 (c) ASSESSMENT OF MEDIA.—The study required by 

9 subsection (a) shall assess all media through which foods 

10 and beverages are marketed to children in elementary and 

11 secondary schools, including— 

12 (1) brand and product logos, names, or infor13 mation on educational materials, book covers, school 

14 supplies, posters, vending machine exteriors, score15 boards, displays, signs, equipment, buses, buildings, 

16 and other school property; 

17 (2) educational and other incentive programs; 

18 (3) label redemption programs; 

19 (4) in-school television, radio, and print publica20 tions; 

21 (5) free samples and coupons; 

22 (6) branded fundraising activities; 

23 (7) taste-testing and other market research ac24 tivities; and 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3625 IH

1 (8) incidental exposure to food and beverage 

2 marketing through computer use, including com3 puter banner and wallpaper ads, or podcasts in 

4 schools. 

5 (d) EXAMINATION OF REGULATORY MECHANISMS.— 

6 The study required by subsection (a) shall also examine 

7 mechanisms regulating marketing in elementary and sec8 ondary schools, including— 

9 (1) Federal, State, and local policies; 

10 (2) contracts; and 

11 (3) sales incentives. 

12 (e) REPORT.—Not later than July 1, 2011, the Sec13 retary shall submit to Congress a report on the results 

14 of the study required by subsection (a). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3654 

To authorize the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to procure, launch, 

and operate the next generation of weather forecasting satellites. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 

Mr. KLEIN of Florida (for himself and Mr. MELANCON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science and Technology 

A BILL 

To authorize the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to procure, launch, and operate the next 

generation of weather forecasting satellites. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hurricane Satellite 

5 Modernization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. XOVWM CONSTELLATION. 

7 (a) ROLE OF NASA.— 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3654 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of NASA 

2 is authorized to procure and launch the next-genera3 tion Extended Ocean Vector Winds Mission, or 

4 XOVWM, constellation of satellites. 

5 (2) COORDINATION.—The Administrator of 

6 NASA shall coordinate with NOAA to ensure that 

7 the capabilities of the XOVWM constellation of sat8 ellites will meet the operational data needs of 

9 NOAA. 

10 (3) PLAN.—The Administrator of NASA shall 

11 develop a plan and schedule for the procurement and 

12 launch of the XOVWM constellation of satellites and 

13 shall submit such plan to the Committee on Science 

14 and Technology of the House of Representatives and 

15 the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Trans16 portation of the Senate. 

17 (b) ROLE OF NOAA.—The Administrator of NOAA 

18 is authorized to operate the constellation of satellites pro19 cured under subsection (a)(1). 

20 (c) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Administrator of NASA 

21 and the Administrator of NOAA shall submit to Congress 

22 an annual report about each agency’s progress in con23 ducting the activities authorized by this section. 

24 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

25 In this Act: 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3654 IH

1 (1) NASA.—The term ‘‘NASA’’ means the Na2 tional Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

3 (2) NOAA.—The term ‘‘NOAA’’ means the Na4 tional Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

5 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

6 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Admin7 istrator of NASA and the Administrator of NOAA a total 

8 of $3,000,000,000 for fiscal years 2010 through 2027 for 

9 the purpose of carrying out section 2. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Silver Wheaton Corp.: Exhibit 4.7 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 4.7



May 7, 2013 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Gentlemen: 

	Re: 	Silver Wheaton Corp. (the
      “Corporation”) 

    Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-185152) of the Corporation
    (the “Registration Statement”)


We, as counsel to the Corporation, hereby consent to the use of
and reference to our firm name in the Registration Statement under the headings “Documents Filed as
Part of the Registration
Statement”, “Legal Matters”, and
“Enforceability of Certain Civil
Liabilities”. 

We confirm that we have read the Registration Statement and that we have no
reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations that are within our
knowledge as a result of the services that we have performed in connection with
the preparation and filing of the Registration Statement. 

Yours truly,

“CASSELS BROCK &BLACKWELL LLP”
1629 Mona Loop, Hilo, HI 96720 T: 808.557.1988 E: tjlerma@gmail.com

April 9, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket

Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington DC 20590

Re: Supporting information for Lewanui UAS exemption

Dear Sir or Madam:

I would like to add some more documents and supporting information to my exemption 

request. I would like to add some additional UAS platforms to my request. I would like 

to add the DJI S1000 Octocopter and the DJI S900 to the list of approved aircraft. Both 

the S1000 and the S900 have a max takeoff weight, including gear, less than 24.2 lbs 

(11kg) and a top speed under 40 knots. I sincerely apologize, due to the size of the file, 

I am unable to attach a copy of the DJI S900 manual, but I have attached the S1000 

manual and a link to the S900 manual. 

DJI S900:

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/s900/en/S900_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf

In addition to the request to add additional aircraft, I have attached the new 

maintenance manual for a previous aircraft listed in our exemption, the DJI Inspire 1. 

If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact the 

undersigned at 808.557.1988 or tjlerma@gmail.com.

Sincerely yours,

Timothy Lerma

Lewanui
#### In the case of Hunter and others vs. Boykin.

«asa *i.*

botSfifo! l, P- 13.

Injunction.

Question of '

pUb325,L326

This was a hill filed by the complainant to obtain an injection against a judgment at law, which Boykin had recovered against the complainants, on a contract made during the revolutionary war, when the paper money, then in circulation, was greatly depreciated. The legis-láture had passed an act, on the 16th March, 1783, enti-tied, « An ordinance for settling a depreciation table.” By this act it was ordained, that the table of depreciation, annexed to the act, stating the progressive depreciation of the paper currency monthly, from .the month of May 1777, to the month of May 1780, should «he the rule for the determination of all differences which may arise on ■any contracts which have been made in this state, by any private persons, and which still subsist.” And that « in the settlement of the depreciation on such contracts, the value of the money shall be fixed at the time the contract was made, and not at the time the contract was to have been fulfilled.”

To prevent the enforcement of the judgment at law, on the nominal amount of the debt, and to have the benefit of the depreciation act, was the object of the bill of the complainant.

Upon the hearing *of*the case, the court ordered, «that the debt in this case be liquidated by the master according to the table of depreciation, and that on payment of the balance of the debt and costs at law, and of this suit, the defendant Boykin acknowledge satisfaction on the judgment obtained by him against the complainants.”*

*

**Although the depreciation act speaks only of *contracts,*it wa3 extended by construction, and upon the reason of the thing, to legacies, and all other transactions arising during the progress of the depreciation of the paper currency: and payments made during depreciation were also reduced by the scale established by law. In the case of Ro*109berts *v.*the executors of Cattell, the complainant sought by his bill the payment of a legacy bequeathed to him by the will of William Cattell. A large payment had been made to the complainant Roberts, on the legacy, during the time of depreciation. In the settlement, the court ordered that the sum *so paid*should he reduced by the scale of depre-c.kiion. The debts and credits in executors’ accounts were also subjected to the scale of depreciation. — -See the caseofDe Bruhm 8c others *v.*the executors of Fenwicke. Register’s book, No. 1, p. 20.
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3663 

AN ACT 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to delay 

the date on which the accreditation requirement under 

the Medicare Program applies to suppliers of durable 

medical equipment that are pharmacies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3663 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MEDICARE DME ACCREDITA2 TION DEADLINE FOR CERTAIN PHARMACIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1834(a)(20)(F)(i) of the 

4 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(20)(F)(i)) is 

5 amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: 

6 ‘‘, except that the Secretary shall not require under this 

7 clause pharmacies to obtain such accreditation before Jan8 uary 1, 2010’’. 

9 (b) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall 

10 be construed as affecting the application of an accredita11 tion requirement for pharmacies to qualify for bidding in 

12 a competitive acquisition area under section 1847 of the 

13 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3663 

AN ACT 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to 

pharmacies. suppliers of durable medical equipment that are ment under the Medicare Program applies to delay the date on which the accreditation require-
**Exhibit 12.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Denis Kessler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SCOR, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SCOR; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) [Omitted in accordance with the guidance of SEC Release No. 33-8238]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by theannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 29, 2004
Denis Kessler
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James K. Hilger,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ JAMES K. HILGER
James K. Hilger
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005