alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40478 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. BOBBY PEREZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-459-1 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Bobby Perez, federal inmate # 82235-079, pleaded guilty to a marijuanatrafficking conspiracy charge and wassentenced to 87 months ofimprisonment. He filed a notice ofappeal more than one year after the criminal judgment was entered. His appeal is dismissed as untimely. See United States v. LeijanoCruz, 473 F.3d 571, 574 (5th Cir. 2006). Perez also filed two motions for appointment of counsel. These motions are denied. APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonic Innovations, Inc. , a Delaware Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Samuel L. Westover, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Michael M. Halloran, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ SAMUEL L. WESTOVERSamuel L. WestoverPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 8, 2007/s/ MICHAEL M. HALLORANMichael M. HalloranVice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 8, 2007


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6829
FRANCIS RUSSELL HOLLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-1501-S) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 27, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Francis Russell Holley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing pleading evincing his intent to seek relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Holley v. Maryland , No. CA-97- 1501-S (D. Md. May 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001105629
<NAME>                        Dolphin.com, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Nov-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   May-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         540
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               540
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       550
<OTHER-SE>                                     540
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   540
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,060
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,060)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
PENNSYLVANIA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (PAARNG) DRINKING WATER PFAS 

SNAPSHOT 

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Williamstown Readiness Center, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. 

Additionally, Army National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the 

Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water 

supplied to the American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base 

drinking water to ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is 

not exceeded.

Test Date: June 2021

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect

Future Testing Event: June 2024

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Pennsylvania National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 717-861-6894

Office E-mail Address: ng.pa.paarng.list.pao@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
# Delaware National Guard hosts Trinidad and Tobago for a critical-infrastructure protection conference

/ Published Dec. 17, 2012

SMYRNA, Del. - The Delaware National Guard hosted its state partner, the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, for a conference Dec. 11 on critical infrastructure protection, focusing on the energy sector.

The conference included representatives from the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Department of Safety and Homeland Security, the State Police and others.

The conference focus was to bring together the various agencies and let them discuss their roles and approaches to security, along with how they respond to threats against critical infrastructure. Through an open dialog and many questions asked by the representatives from Trinidad and Tobago, the partnerships between Delaware’s agencies became apparent.

“I think through our tours and discussions today we certainly learned the value of enhancing partnerships,” said Kurt Reuther, Homeland Security Advisor. “That is really what is going to make homeland security programs work in both our countries. The partnerships are really where the rubber hits the road and where we are going to have success.”

The highlight of the conference was a boat tour of the Delaware River, with stops at the Port of Wilmington and the Delaware City Refining Company. While at the Port of Wilmington, attendees were given an overview of how the Port manages security and responds to threats. At the Delaware City Refining Company, a bus tour was given of the facility with particular focus on how they monitor such a large area that has multiple access points and employees from various companies on site.

Col. Rodney Smart, Chair of Trinidad and Tobago’s Energy Sector Security Initiative said, “with the education we’ve been given today, we are going to take back some of this and it’s going to help us improve the security of Trinidad and Tobago and by extension, the energy security that we offer the rest of the world.”

Because of the many similarities between Delaware and Trinidad and Tobago, the seven-year partnership has been a prosperous one. The Delaware National Guard continues to foster and enhance its relationship with its state partner, making several visits a year to Trinidad and Tobago, as well as, hosting leaders and dignitaries from there.

“We have developed such strong, strong relations with the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago and their defense forces, it’s just magnificent the exchanges that we’ve been able to make, in a wide variety of different areas,” said Maj. Gen. Frank Vavala, adjutant general of the Delaware National Guard. “I can’t say enough about the value of this great state partnership with Trinidad and Tobago.”

Conferences like this are beneficial because not only are they building the state to country partnership, but also the partnerships between interstate agencies. While each agency has its own mission, there are instances when those missions can come together and benefit the entire state.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Wayne Pastore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



Date: May 4, 2010/s/ WAYNE PASTORE Wayne Pastore Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Puerto Rico Guard Helps Give Toys to Children for Holidays
 
  By Story by 2nd Lt. Eliezer Soto,
  MUÑIZ AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, Puerto Rico - The Puerto Rico Air National Guard is helping distribute toys to children across Puerto Rico during the holidays. The 156th Wing received the C-130J Super Hercules "Fat Albert" aircraft assigned to the U.S. Navy Flight Demonstration Squadron, the Blue Angels, as part of the Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots program. Airmen assigned to the 156th Wing provided logistical support for unloading 16 pallets of toys that will be distributed in partnership with Toys for Tots. "Supporting this great initiative by the Blue Angels and the Marines Toys for Tots allows the Puerto Rico Air National Guard Airmen to collaborate in impacting our local communities by providing comfort and hope to children during this holiday season," said U.S. Air Force Col. Evaristo Orengo, the 156th Wing commander. "We are honored to be able to contribute to a 76-year national charitable program such as Toys for Tots through our Airmen's efforts and our flight line capabilities." U.S. Navy Lt. Cmdr. Natalia Luchetti, the assistant maintenance officer with the U.S. Navy Flight Demonstration Squadron, the Blue Angels, and the first Puerto Rican female maintenance officer in Blue Angels history, was happy to return to her country for the program. "I feel proud and honored to be here representing my country while bringing warmth and joy to children during the holidays with this
group," said Luchetti. "As a little girl living in Puerto Rico, I was impacted by the Toys for Tots program, so I am honored and privileged to be with this organization, giving back to other children what I received.” In addition to providing logistical support, Airmen with the 156th Wing teamed with Marines assigned to Det. 1 Landing Support Company, Combat Logistics Regiment 45, 4th Marine Logistics Group, and Toys for Tots to give out more than 180 toys at Dr. Julio J. Henna Elementary School. "It is amazing having the Puerto Rico Air National Guard involved as volunteers in the foundations of Toys for Tots," said U.S. Marine Corps Sgt. Yadiel Burgos-Benitez, a Toys for Tots coordinator. "This event has a powerful impact in the community, and it also gives us a wholesome feeling by seeing the smiles on the children's faces as they receive their toys." Maria Bernal-Zarzuela, a community leader who has worked as assistant coordinator for Toys for Tots for seven years, said the program has allowed her and other leaders to spread joy in their communities. "Thanks to Toys for Tots we are able to be the face of happiness for children in our community during the holiday season," said Bernal-Zarzuela.
Exhibit 23.5






                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

     Gaffney,  Cline & Associates Inc. hereby consents to the use of its oil and
gas reserve reports in the Form S-4  Registration  Statement (the  "Registration
Statemen")  to  be  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange   Commission  on
approximately  July 11, 1997 by Magnum  Hunter  Resoures,  Inc.,  Magnum  Hunter
Production,  Inc.,  Hunter Gas Gathering,  Inc., Gruy Petroleum  Management Co.,
Conmag Energy  Corporation and Rampart  Petroleum,  Inc. and to the reference to
our firm under the captions "Prospectus  Summary," "Business and Properties" and
"Experts" in the Registration Statement.


                                             GAFFNEY, CLINE & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                             /s/ Bill Cline
                                        BY:----------------------------------
                                             Bill Cline, Authorized Officer     

July 11, 1997
Exhibit 31.2
 Certifications
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Intevac, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ JEFFREY ANDRESON

Jeffrey AndresonExecutive Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
#### Isaac Middleton, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

To take and carry away a bale of cotton from in front of a warehouse where valuable goods were stored, with Intent to steal the same, does not constitute the offense of larceny from the house. The evidence must show that the property alleged to have been stolen was in some house and that it was taken by the defendant therefrom.

Criminal law. Larceny. Before Judge Schley. ' Chat-ham Superior Court. November Special Term, 1873.

For the facts of this case, see the decision.

Philip M. *&*R. Wayne Russell, by Henry B. Tompkins, for plaintiff in error.

Albert R. Lamar, solicitor general, by R. H. Clark, for the state.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The‘defendant was indicted for the offense of “larceny from the house,” and on the trial thereof the jury, under the charge ■ *249of the court, found the defendant guilty. A motion was made for a new trial on the ground of error in the charge of the court to the jury, and because the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, which motion was overruled and the defendant excepted. The defendant' is charged in the indictment with having taken and carried away from the warehouse of the prosecutor one bale of cotton, the said warehouse being a place where valuable goods were stored, with intent to steal the same. The evidence in the record shows that the bale of cotton was not *in*the warehouse, but *outside*of it, in an alley way. The court charged the jury “that if they found from the evidence that the bale of cotton was in front of the warehouse and under its control and protection, it would be the same criminally as if within its walls, and would be a taking from, upon the same basis as if a storekeeper places goods in front of his store, and a thief take them therefrom, it would be larceny from the house.” The 4413th section of the Code defines larceny from the house to be the breaking or entering any house Avith intent to steal, or after breaking or entering said house, stealing *therefrom,*any money, goods, clothes, wares, merchandise, or any thing or things of value whatever. The 4414th section defines the penalty for stealing *in*any of the houses described in that section. Simple theft or larceny is the wrongful and fraudulent taking and carrying away by any person, of the personal goods of another, with intent to steal the same: Code 4393. The distinction between simple larceny and larceny from the house will be readily perceived. The evidence in the record before us does not show that the defendant was guilty of the offense of larceny from the house inasmuch as it does not show that the cotton alleged to have been stolen was *in*any house, or that it was taken by the defendant *therefrom.*The charge of the court, in view of the evidence contained in the record, was error.

Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.
```

                             PX Holding Corporation
                               35 East 62nd Street
                            New York, New York 10021

                                                                  March 30, 2005

Panavision Inc.
c/o Bobby Jenkins
6219 De Soto Avenue
Woodland Hills, CA 91367-2602

Gentlemen:

     PX Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("PX Holding"), confirms to
Panavision Inc. ("Panavision") that, in the event that Panavision's 9 5/8%
Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2006 ("Senior Subordinated Notes") are not repaid,
retired or refinanced prior to December 1, 2005, or the applicable provision of
the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement is not amended such that Panavision's
term loans do not become immediately due and payable, PX Holding is prepared, if
necessary, to provide financial support sufficient to allow the repayment,
retirement or refinancing of the Senior Subordinated Notes.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             PX HOLDING CORPORATION

                                             By: /s/ Howard Gittis
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name: Howard Gittis
                                             Title: Vice Chairman
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07588]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) Program Availability of 
Application Packages

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of the availability of 
Application Packages for the 2016 Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) 
Program.

DATES: Application instructions are available electronically from the 
IRS on May 1, 2015 by visiting: IRS.gov (key word search--``TCE'') or 
through Grants.gov. The deadline for submitting an application package 
to the IRS for the Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) Program is May 
31, 2015. However, because this date falls on a non-workday the 
deadline is being extended until Monday, June 1, 2015. All applications 
must be submitted through Grants.gov.

ADDRESSES: Internal Revenue Service, Grant Program Office, 5000 Ellin 
Road, NCFB C4-110, SE:W:CAR:SPEC:FO:GPO, Lanham, Maryland 20706.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grant Program Office via their email 
address at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b3f282e652c392a253f65242d2d22282e0b223938652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdc9ded893dacfdcd3c993d2dbdbd4ded8fdd4cfce93dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority for the Tax Counseling for the 
Elderly (TCE) Program is contained in Section 163 of the Revenue Act of 
1978, Public Law 95-600, (92 Stat. 12810), November 6, 1978. 
Regulations were published in the Federal Register at 44 FR 72113 on 
December 13, 1979. Section 163 gives the IRS authority to enter into 
cooperative agreements with private or public non-profit agencies or 
organizations to establish a network of trained volunteers to provide 
free tax information and return preparation assistance to elderly 
individuals. Elderly individuals are defined as individuals age 60 and 
over at the close of their taxable year. Because applications are being 
solicited before the FY 2016 budget has been approved, cooperative 
agreements will be entered into subject to the appropriation of funds.

    Dated: March 23, 2015.
Mikki Betker,
Chief, Grant Program Office, IRS, Stakeholder Partnerships, Education & 
Communication.
[FR Doc. 2015-07588 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>