alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/s/ Donna UrbainName:Donna UrbainTitle:Principal Financial Officer with respect to Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.Date:July 29, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,281,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,617,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,356
<INVENTORY>                                  7,701,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,069,257
<PP&E>                                       6,591,455
<DEPRECIATION>                                 581,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,914,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,984,554
<BONDS>                                      7,771,316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,426
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,117,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,914,597
<SALES>                                     22,892,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,892,978
<CGS>                                       18,081,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,081,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,614,533
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               133,196
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,590,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (22,808,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (22,808,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                304,923
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (22,503,109)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.37)
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Dasi Reddy Dayakar and * From the 42nd District Court

Satguru Hospitality, LLC, of Taylor County

 Trial Court No. 47,626-A.

Vs. No. 11-16-00256-CV * December 8, 2016

Civic Plaza, LLC, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered the parties’ joint motion for dismissal and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.
April9, 2014 

Docket No. F AA-2013-0855 

Case No. 2012-GL-25-0058 

To His Honor, Judge J.E. Sullivan; 

RECEIVED 

APR 1 6 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

In regards to the above mentioned case, I respectfully request a hearing to take place in 

Cleveland, Ohio. At this hearing I also request that Ms. Chris Paucho, the Flight Standards 

District Office Chief, also be present, along with FAA counsel Kate Barber as well as my 

representing council, if necessary. I do not feel that the previous options offered by Ms. Barber 

presented adequate opportunity to effectively answer the allegations presented against me. 

In regards to the FAA's Complaint dated January 30, 2013, my Answers are as follows: 

*Paragraph 1) Admit 

*Paragraph 2) Denied 

*Paragraph 3) Denied 

*Paragraph 4) Lack of Knowledge 

*Paragraph 5) Denied 

*Paragraph 6) Denied 

It has always been my sole intent to promote the sport of skydiving, as well as aviation, 

in a positive and safety conscious manner. I feel I have done this by having completed in excess 

of 8,000 Tandem and AFF skydives as a USPA licensed instructor with never an accident, 

incident nor complaint filed against me. I would, again, request a hearing in my home state so as 

to defend my integrity as well as my safety consciousness in this matter. 

Respectfully, 

JJ~tl~ 

David A. Draves 
April9, 2014 

Docket No. F AA-2013-0855 

Case No. 2012-GL-25-0058 

CERTIFIED and FIRST CLASS MAIL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Ave., SW 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn. Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Ms. Kate Barber 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v. COLSON RUSSELL MILTON, Appellant. No. 70042-1-
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: MAY 1 2 7014 -e- >^3

ro S9 CD


### PerCuriam — Colson Milton appeals his conviction for second degree assault, 

### arguing that thetrial court erred in instructing the jurythat it had a "dutyto convict" ifit found all the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. This argument is 

### controlled by ourdecision in State v. Ryan P. Moore, No. 69766-8(Wash. February 18, 2014) and the cases cited therein. Affirmed. FOR THE COURT: 

# -^r 

# Si•C(At~Cf~-*
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3601 

To amend the Credit CARD Act of 2009 to provide an earlier effective 

date, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Credit CARD Act of 2009 to provide an 

earlier effective date, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit CARD Act Ef5 fective Date Change Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHANGE IN EFFECTIVE DATE. 

7 Section 3 of the Credit Card Accountability Responsi8 bility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (15 U.S.C. 1602 nt.) 

9 is amended by striking ‘‘become effective 9 months after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act,’’ and inserting ‘‘take 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3601 IH

1 effect on the date of the enactment of the Credit CARD 

2 Act Effective Date Change Act,’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ASIA CORK INC. on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Yi Tong, Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.








February
11, 2010









By:
            /s/ Yi
TongYi Tong, CFO and
      Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection
with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Holli C. Nichols, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)
the Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
 the dates and for the periods indicated.  Date: August
 7, 2008
By:
/s/ HOLLI
 C. NICHOLSHolli C. NicholsExecutive Vice President and Chief
 Financial Officer
No. 2,262.

#### S. L. FROST, and MARGARET F. FROST (his wife), Respondents, *v.*FREDERICK HARFORD, (Administrator of the Estate of William Harford, deceased), Appellant.

Pleading. — Complaint.—Joindee of Husband and Wipe. — A complaint drawn in the name of a husband and wife to recover on a note given to the female plaintiff, if it contain no averment that the plaintiffs were husband and wife at the time the note was given, is not bad on demurrer on the ground of a misjoinder of parties plaintiff.

Appeal. — Conflicting Evidence. — The finding in the Court below, where the evidence is conflicting, will not be disturbed on-appeal.

Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe Second District, Butte County.

Tbis action was brought in tbe name of S. L. Frost and Margaret F. Frost, bis wife, against defendant, administrator of tbe estate of William Harford, deceased, to recover a sum of money due- on a note executed and delivered to said Margaret F. Frost, by said Wm. Harford during bis lifetime. Defendant demurred to tbe complaint on tbe ground of misjoinder of parties plaintiff in tbe action. Tbe demurrer was overruled.

Tbe cause was tried by tbe Court, and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant moved for a new trial, wbicb was denied,' and from tbe order denying tbe motion for a new trial and from tbe judgment, tbis appeal is taken.

Tbe other facts are stated in tbe opinion-

*Jo Hamilton,*Attorney-General, for Appellant.

*Henry Starr,*for Respondent.

Wallaoe, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court, Temple, J., Cbookett, J., and Rhodes, C. J., concurring:

There was upon tbe face of tbe complaint no misjoinder of parties plaintiff. It did not appear by any averment in tbe complaint that tbe plaintiffs were husband and wife at tbe time tbe note was given to tbe female plaintiff. Tbe demurrer was, therefore, properly overruled.

*166Tbe finding of tbe Court below is, tbat tbe defences set up in tbe answer (tbat tbe note in suit was not made by tbe deceased, William Harford; tbat there was no consideration etc.,) are not true in point of fact, and as tbe evidence is conflicting upon all tbe points, tbe finding'will not be disturbed bere.

Tbe defence set up in tbe answer, to tbe effect tbat tbe plaintiff, Margaret, is not tbe legal owner and bolder of tbis note, wbicb runs to ber upon its face, is frivolous; and tbe other defence, tbat tbe note is not ber separate property, is tbe statement of a mere conclusion of law; and each of these pretended defences would doubtless have been stricken out in tbe Court below on motion.

■ Tbe judgment and order are affirmed.

Sprague, J., expressed no opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Jerome R Mahoney,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                       Date: November 15, 2004

                                       By /s/ Jerome R Mahoney
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       Jerome R Mahoney
                                       President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofSonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 10,2003 and as amended on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, HassanM. Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: June 10, 2005 | /s/ Hassan M. Ahmed                                                                              |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Hassan M. Ahmed                                                                                  |
|                     | *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the  Board of  Directors (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

1

----
# New York Guard aviators heading to Horn of Africa

/ Published Nov. 1, 2013

LATHAM, N.Y. - A small unit of New York Army National Guard aviators who fly the military's C-12 transport plane are heading for Fort Hood, Texas, before deploying to the Horn of Africa in November.

The eight Soldiers assigned to Detachment 20 Operational Support Airlift Agency will in-process at Fort Hood before deploying to Camp Lemonnier, in Djibouti.

The Soldiers will provide air transportation and cargo support for the United States Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa, which is based at Camp Lemonnier. They will be away from home for about 11 months.

A short farewell ceremony was held for the Soldiers Oct. 25 at the Army Aviation Support Facility at the Albany International Airport.

"This is a small group, but it is a group of seasoned professionals," Maj. Gen. Patrick Murphy, the adjutant general of New York, told the Soldiers’ families. "It's a great mission. It's an important mission."

The detachment consists of six warrant officer pilots and two administrative and operations sergeants. The most inexperienced pilot has 2,300 hours of flight time, while the most experienced pilot has more than 21,000 hours of experience as a pilot, said Chief Warrant Officer Kent Wagner, the detachment commander.

The Operational Support Airlift Agency is a joint active Army and Army National Guard entity, which provides passenger transport for Army and other military passengers within the United States.

The Latham-based Detachment 20, operates a C-12 based at the Latham flight facility. The C-12 is the military version of the Beechcraft Super King Air turboprop aircraft, which can carry up to 13 passengers depending on the model and configuration.

The unit deployed to Afghanistan in 2009-2010, where the Soldiers flew specially configured C-12s designed to spot improvised explosive devices from the air. The detachment also deployed to Colombia in 2006 to support U.S. operations in that country.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Unigene Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Warren P.
Levy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Warren P. Levy     
|Warren P. Levy         
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 11, 2009           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unigene
Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
April 2, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KHALEEM HASAN GUILLORY, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00138-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. 

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified 

below for observance.
EXHIBIT 21



SPACEHAB, Incorporated and Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                   |  |                               |  |                             
|---------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiaries               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Business Name               
|Astrotech Space Operations, Inc    |  | Delaware                      |  | Astrotech                   
|                                   |  |                              
|SPACEHAB Government Services, Inc. |  | Colorado                      |  | SPACEHAB Government Services
|                                   |  |                              
|Space Media, Inc                   |  | Delaware                      |  | Space Media                 
|                                   |  |                              
|Space Store, LLC                   |  | Delaware                      |  | Space Store                 
|                                   |  |                              
|Astrotech Florida Holdings, Inc.   |  | Florida                       |  | Astrotech Florida
---

---

# SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION

# WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

# FORM 8-K

# CURRENT REPORT

# PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (date of
earliest event reported):  February 3, 2004

# LAS VEGAS SANDS, INC.

(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)

|NEVADA                       | 333-42147                | 04-3010100         
|---------------------------- | ------------------------ | -------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer      
|of incorporation)            |                          | Identification No.)

|                                         |           
|---------------------------------------- | ----------
|3355 LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD SOUTH           |           
|LAS VEGAS, NEVADA                        | 89109     
|(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code)

Registrants
telephone number, including area code: (702) 414-1000

# NOT APPLICABLE

(Former name or former
address, if changed since last report)

---

---

---

Item
9. Regulation FD Disclosure.

The
following information is being furnished under Item 12  Results of Operations and
Financial Condition.

On
February 3, 2004, Las Vegas Sands Inc. hosted a conference call and webcast to discuss its
results of operations for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2003 and select financial data for the month of January 2004.
The graph presentation of the
conference call and webcast is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to
this report and is incorporated by reference into this item.

---

# SIGNATURES

| | Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Dated:
February 3, 2004
| | -----------------------

| |  | LAS VEGAS SANDS, INC.By:       /s/ Harry D. Miltenberger            
Name:   Harry D. MiltenbergerTitle:     Vice President - Finance
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

# INDEX TO EXHIBITS

|99.1 |  | Graphs, dated February 3, 2004
|---- |  | ------------------------------