alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Guard Bureau chief Lengyel issues holiday greeting
 
  By  Air Force Gen. Joseph Lengyel
  ARLINGTON, Va. - As we celebrate this holiday season and look forward to 2017, I extend my warmest greetings, deep gratitude and best wishes to you and your families. In my first four months, I've witnessed Guardsmen from around the 54 continue to perform amazingly. Whether it's serving in distant countries overseas, or working in our states and communities here at home, each and every one of you continue to answer the call. You and I cannot serve without the support of our family members, friends, and employers who serve as the backbone of our National Guard. During this holiday season, let us thank them for their support and for enabling us to continue to serve. As you enjoy the holidays, please stay safe and watch out for your Battle Buddy and Wingman. This is truly a team effort and each of you are important to what we do, so we need you to remain safe. Thank you for supporting and protecting our nation. Sally and I wish you and your family a joyful and festive holiday season and a safe and happy 2017! "Always Ready, Always There!"
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000853566
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,397,012
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,397,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,299
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,247,628)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,167,329)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350


(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer
of AMASYS Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of his
knowledge and belief that:





(1) The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
August 12, 2010











/s/
      C.W. GILLULYC.W.
      GillulyPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-K.
Exhibit No. 21


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY




                                                 JURISDICTION
   NAME                                        OF INCORPORATION


American Asset Development Corporation            New Jersey

Capital Financial Corp.                           New Jersey
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (a) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-47554) pertaining to theCommon Stock of Learning Tree International, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, (b) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32062) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., (c) the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 333-41325) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., and (d) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103372) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., ofour report dated November 5, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Learning Tree International, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 1, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

December 10, 2004
EXHIBIT
32.1



|CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO                    
|-------------------------------------------------
|18
    U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS
    ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION
    906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|                                                 

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Seafarer Exploration Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kyle Kennedy, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: November 13, 2023 | By: | /s/
    Kyle Kennedy                                                                                                                                                         | 
|------------------------ | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                         |     | Kyle
    Kennedy                                                                                                                                                             | 
|                         |     | President,
    Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
    (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and 
    acting Principal Accounting Officer) |
Petition for Exemption

I am requesting an exemption for to fly a drone under 200 feet.

The purpose is to take photos of my clients homes that are for sale.

I could not find an official form for this.

Thank you for your consideration

Sherry Mattox

5871 Brassie Ridge Lane

Ellenwood, GA 30294

770-593-4761
<PAGE>   1
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-1326 on Form S-3 dated February 13, 1996, related to the Dividend
Reinvestment Plan; No. 33-80847 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related to
the 1989 Executive Stock Option Plan; No. 33-80851 on Form S-8, dated December
28, 1995, related to the 1989 Directors' Stock Option Plan; No. 33-80857 on Form
S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related to the 1989 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan; No. 33-80859 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related to the 1994
Executive Stock Plan; No. 33-80861 on Form S-8, dated December 28, 1995, related
to the 1994 Directors' Stock Option Plan; and No. 33-80863 on Form S-8 dated
December 28, 1995, related to the First Northern Savings Bank, S.A. 401(k)
Savings Plan and the related Prospectuses constituting a part thereof of our
report dated January 22, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of First Northern Capital Corp. included in the annual report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 15, 1999
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30256 Summary Calendar

PAUL PETER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(95-CV-949)

___________________________ September 19, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, AND BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: * Paul Peter has appealed the district court’s affirmance of the Social Security Commissioner’s decision which denied him disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The judgment of the district court is supported by substantial evidence in the record and proper legal standards were used in2

evaluating the evidence. We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s report, which the district court adopted. See Peter v. Chater , No. 95-CV-37-949 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 27, 1996). JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 359 

For the relief of Geert Botzen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2009 

Ms. LEE of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Geert Botzen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GEERT 

4 BOTZEN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Geert Botzen shall be eligible for issuance of an immi8 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

12 permanent resident. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 359 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Geert Botzen en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), and is not inadmissible under paragraph 

4 (2) or (3) of section 212(a) of the Immigration and Na5 tionality Act, he shall be considered to have entered and 

6 remained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of 

7 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation8 ality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

9 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

10 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap11 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica12 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

13 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Geert Botzen, the Secretary of State shall in17 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

18 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi19 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun20 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi21 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

22 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na23 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

24 202(e) of such Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.



|              |  |  |  |                                      
|------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|              |  | 
|April 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    STEPHANIE G.
DIMARCO          
|              |  |  |  | Stephanie G. DiMarco                 
|              |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 as been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NEBRASKA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (NEARNG) DRINKING 

WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Norfolk Field Maintenance Shop (FMS) 7/Fire Station does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the 

EPA HA. Additionally, Army National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the 

standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality 

of drinking water supplied to the American public. The Army National Guard will continue to 

monitor on-base drinking water to ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking 

water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: February 2020

PFOA + PFOS Results: 3.4 ppt (J)i

Future Testing Event: February 2023

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Nebraska National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 402-309-8390

Office E-mail Address: ng.ne.neang.mbx.pao-public@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location

i The reported result is an estimate. Values noted with a ‘J’ flag were detected by the laboratory but the true concentration is 

uncertain.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Date: October 19, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Analysis of Methane (CH 4 ) Certification Data for Model Years 2010-2012 Vehi cles.

FROM: Anthony Neam, Assessment and Standards Divisi on

TO: EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

This memorandum explains how the EPA calculated ave rage methane for gasoline, diesel and E85 fueled vehicles.

EPA acquired certification data (emissions and fuel economy testing of production vehicles) from its VERIFY database. The data is from model y ears 2010, 2011, and 2012. Production volumes were not known for the vehicles, so a simpl e average of the weighted Methane values (45% Highway Methane + 55% City Methane) was used t o determine the average Methane value for each fuel type.

The average Methane values are as follows:

Fuel Type Average of (Methane 45% HW+55% City for e ach vehicle)
Gasoline 0.0056
Diesel 0.0187
E85 0.0149
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 
 THIS ASSIGNMENT
OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT dated April 26, 2013, is made by and between Wheeler Interests, LLC a Virginia limited liability company, (“Assignor”), and WHLR-Winslow, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”).

 Background: 

A. Wheeler Interests, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company and Winslow Plaza Investors, LP, a Delaware limited partnership previously
entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 12, 2013 (the “Agreement”), with respect to the purchase of a shopping center located at Sicklerville, New Jersey and commonly referred to as Winslow Plaza; 

B. Assignor desires to assign the Agreement to Assignee. 
 Agreement: 
 For and in consideration of the mutual promises herein,
Assignor herby assigns all of its rights and delegates all of its obligations under the Agreement to Assignee, including all rights to any earnest money deposit or other payment, and Assignee hereby accepts the assignment of the rights of Assignor
under the Agreement and assumes all of the obligations and liabilities of Assignor under the Agreement. 
 (Signature Page
Follows) 







 In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the
26th day of April, 2013. 

 

			
	ASSIGNOR:
	
	 Wheeler Interests, LLC
 a Virginia limited liability company

		
		 	 /s/ Jon S. Wheeler

		 	By Jon S. Wheeler, its Managing Member
	
	ASSIGNEE:
	
	 WHLR-Winslow, LLC

a Delaware limited liability company

		
		 	 /s/ Jon S. Wheeler

		 	By Jon S. Wheeler, its Manager
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 13

- 075C (Filed May 1 6 , 201 4 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* PARICHEHR FARZAM, *

* Plaintiff, *

*

v. *

* THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

Because this case is brought pursuant to the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 209(d), it will involve personnel records which are protected by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. Pending b efore the Court is defendant’s Motion for a Privacy Act

Protective Order to guard the confidentiality of any payroll or human resources materials relating to plaintiff and to the comparators identified by her

. As discussed during yesterday’s hearing, the Court is concerned by certain features of the protective order proposed by the government

. In particular, there does not seem to be any warrant for imposing different sta ndards on plaintiff and on government employees regarding access to and use of protected information.

While paragraph 4 of the proposed protective order would prevent plaintiff from having access to the records concerning the identified comparators, these

records

--- as well as those pertaining to her

--- could be shared with other

“ employees of the United States government who have a need to know the protected

information for the defe nse or prosecution of this case” under d efendant’s p roposed

sub

- paragraph 4(d) . Since p roposed sub

- paragraphs 4(b), 4(c), and 4(e) provide for access to counsel and individuals assisting counsel , proposed sub

- paragraph 4(d) appears to be designed to give access to decision makers and party representatives of the government agency which emplo ys plaintiff. The Court is not aware of anybasis for treating the defendant more favorably than plaintiff in this regard, and therefore cannot accept proposed sub

- paragraph 4(d).

The Court also modifies p roposed paragraphs 5 and 8 to make it clear that

t he same requirements and procedures for obtaining court approval prior to the

disclosure of protected information to third parties

, or the use of protected

information in open court

, apply equally to both parties. Finally, the reference to

the comparators selected by plaintiff is changed from “alleg ed male comparators ” to

“ identified male comparators .”

The defendant’s motion for a protective order is accordingly GRANTED

- IN

PART and DENIED

- IN

- PART . The approved protective order

--- adapted from defendant’s proposed order as described above

--- will issue separately. As

discussed during yesterday’s hearing, the parties’ counsel will con fer and attempt to agree to addi tional language, to amend the protective order (with Court approval), detailing the procedures to be followed to allow information from protected records

to be shared with plaintiff or other government employees involved in th is litigation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Victor J. Wolski

VICTOR J. WOLSKI Judge

- 2

-
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                      SUBSIDIARIES OF deCODE GENETICS, INC


1.       Islensk erfdagreining ehf., an Icelandic private limited company
         (English name: deCODE genetics ehf,)

2.       MediChem Life Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation



                   SUBSIDIARIES OF ISLENSK ERFDAGREINING EHF.

1.       Islenskar lyfjarannsoknir ehf., an Icelandic private limited company
         (English name: Encode ehf.)

2.       Islenskar krabbameinsrannsoknir ehf., an Icelandic private limited
         company (English name: deCODE Cancer ehf.)

3.       Vetrargardurinn ehf., an Icelandic private limited company
         (formerly known as Sturlugata 8, ehf.)



                  SUBSIDIARIES OF MEDICHEM LIFE SCIENCES, INC.

1.       Emerald BioStructures, Inc., a Washington corporation

2.       ThermoGen, Inc., an Illinois corporation

3.       Advanced X-Ray Analytical Services, Inc., an Illinois corporation

4.       MediChem Research, Inc., an Illinois corporation

5.       MediChem Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Preliminary Assessment – Conceptual Site Model Information

Are there drinking water supply wells on installation? No

Do they serve off-post populations? No

Are there off-post drinking water wells downgradient? There is one domestic well and one irrigation well 

within the boundary of JFHQ; however, there are 12 wells within one mile of the facility but only one 

monitoring well is downgradient.

Waste Water Treatment Plant:

Has the installation ever had a WWTP, past or present? No

If so, do we understand the process and which water is/was treated at the plant? N/A

Do we understand the fate of sludge waste? N/A

Is surface water from potential contaminated sites treated? N/A

Equipment Rinse Water

1. Is firefighting equipment washed? Where does the rinse water go?

N/A

2. Are nozzles tested? How often are nozzles tested? Where are nozzles tested? Are nozzles cleaned after 

use? Where does the rinse water flow after cleaning nozzles?

N/A

3. Other? 

Firefighting services for the JFHQ are provided by the Rapid City Fire Department.

Identify Potential Receptors: 

Site Worker Yes

Construction Worker Yes

Recreational User No

Residential Yes

Child No

Ecological No

Note what is located near by the site (e.g. daycare, schools, hospitals, churches, agricultural, livestock)?

There is a residential area, schools, churches and a hospital all within one mile of the facility.

Documentation 

Ask for Engineering drawings (if applicable). Has there been a reconstruction or changes to the drainage 

system? When did that occur? JFHQ has a drainage system, where surface water drains to Rapid Creek, 

then flows into the Cheyenne River.
PFAS Preliminary Assessment Report

Joint Forces Headquarters

Rapid City, SD

 

Appendix C 

Photographic Log
Preliminary Assessment Report

JFHQ, Rapid City, South Dakota

Perfluorooctane-Sulfonic Acid (PFOS) and 

Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Impacted Sites

ARNG Installations, Nationwide

AECOM

APPENDIX C – Photographic Log

Army National Guard, Preliminary

Assessment for PFAS JFHQ South Dakota

Photograph No. 1

Description:

A view of a Class B fire 

extinguisher located at JFHQ.