alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Arkansas Air Guardsmen Provide Medical Care in Guatemala

/ Published Oct. 31, 2022

PUERTO BARRIOS, Guatemala – Arkansas Air National Guard members helped provide medical care in Guatemala alongside U.S. and foreign military, government and civilian personnel during the Continuing Promise 2022 mission Oct. 26-31.

Senior Airman Tabari Matthews, 189th dental technician, assisted Canadian Army Capt. Cleve Kim, dentist, in planning treatment for 35 people Oct. 28.

“It is a lot of fun talking to other military forces,” Kim said. “I get to know them and how they operate. It has been an interesting and memorable experience.”

“It was a great learning experience,” Matthews said. “Capt. Kim was very precise, and it was interesting to work with him and the other dentists.”

Kim also recognized some challenges that arise when working with foreign personnel.

“I have to convert the system for numbering teeth that I’m used to and use the American system,” said Kim. “So I slow down in order to make sure we are communicating clearly with one another.”

Continuing Promise 2022 began with the departure of the U.S. Navy hospital ship USNS Comfort (T-AH 20) from Miami to the U.S. Southern Command area of operations.

The Comfort is visiting Guatemala, Honduras, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Haiti from October to December. During these mission stops, medical teams work with partner nation medical personnel to provide care on board and at land-based medical sites. The goal is to increase medical readiness, strengthen partnerships, and enhance the capabilities of the U.S. Navy and partner nations to respond to public health disasters and humanitarian crises.

Since 2007, Continuing Promise medical personnel have treated more than 582,000 people and conducted more than 7,000 surgeries.

The Guatemala mission was supported by U.S. military personnel from Joint Task Force-Bravo, U.S. State Department, U.S. Health and Human Services, U.S. Public Health Services, and the U.S. Agency for International Development supported the mission. Also part of the team: non-federal entities and academic institutions and medical personnel from Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Honduras, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.

Continuing Promise 2022 encourages partnerships between nations, non-federal entities and international organizations. The mission uses the Department of Defense National Guard Bureau State Partnership Program with Guatemala to support security cooperation, interoperability, and humanitarian assistance with expeditionary medical care while increasing readiness.

The Arkansas National Guard and Guatemala have been paired in the State Partnership Program for two decades.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    Exhibit 4.59

  SECOND AMENDMENT TO SUPPLY CONTRACT FOR SURABAYA- UJUNG PANDANG - BANJARMASIN
  (SUB) CAPACITY EXPANSION NO. K.TEL 20/HK920/ITS-00/2007 DATED 26 JANUARY 2007

<TABLE>
<S>                    <C>
The Parties:           1.   TELKOM; and

                       2.   NEC Corporation ("NEC").

Preceding Agreements:  1.   Supply Contract for Surabaya- Ujung Pandang -
                            Banjarmasin (SUB) Capacity Expansion No.
                            K.TEL.188/HK910/ITS-00/2006 dated 16 August 2006;

                       2.   First Amendment No.K.TEL. 431/HK920/ITS-00/2006 dated 29 December 2006.

Amended Provision:     The parties agree to amend the total agreement price.
</TABLE>
Order entered April 22 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00141
- CV
IN RE IRVING LONG TERM CARE, LLC D/B/A LAS BRISAS REHABILITATION & WELLNESS SUITES AND THI OF TEXAS, LLC , Relators
O riginal Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 12843
- K

O RDER Justices Molberg, Partida

- Kipness, and Reichek
It has come to our attention that two o f the defend a n ts have removed th e underlying suit to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Texas t hrough the filing of a March 17, 20 21 notice of removal in the trial court

. Purs uant to 28 U.S.C. §1446(d), once removal is effected, “the Stat e court shal l proceed no further unless and until the case is remanded.” 28 U.S.C. §1446(d) ; see Meyerland Co. v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Co , 848 S.W.2d 82, 83 (Tex. 1993). Accordingly, for adminis trative purposes, this original p roceeding is
ABATED . It may be reinstated on prompt motion by any party showing that thecase has been remanded and specifying what further action, if any, is required from

this Court.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 12.2****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Rinaldi Firmansyah, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to AnnualReport on Form 20-F/A of PERUSAHAAN PERSEROAN (PERSERO)P.T. TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA Tbk.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;     4. The company’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the company and have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the company, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;           (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and           (c) disclosed in this report any change in the    company’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has    materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially    affect, the company’s internal control over financial    reporting; and     5. The company’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditorsand the audit committee of the company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report    financial information; and           (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: April 25, 2005/s/ Rinaldi Firmansyah Name: Rinaldi FirmansyahTitle:  Director of Finance
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6192** 

MALCOLM MUHAMMAD , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. DR. L. TATRO; K. GIVENS , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 7:12

- cv - 00043

- SGW

- RSB )

Submitted : May 26, 2013 Decided: May 3 1 , 2013

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia; Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Muhamma d v. Tatro , No. 7:12

- cv - 00043

- SGW

- RSB (W.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Green  Clover  Luck
Corporation,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Daniel L. Hodges, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation     General Partner

 

/S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________

Name: Kelly TucekTitle: Assistant Vice President of the General Partner and        Principal Financial Officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.

Date: August 11, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3606 Received in Senate (RDS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3606

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 14, 2009

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Truth in Lending Act to make a technical correction to an 
             amendment made by the Credit CARD Act of 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Credit CARD Technical Corrections 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

    Section 163(a) of the Truth in Lending Act (U.S.C. 1666b(a)), as 
amended by section 106(b) of the Credit Card Accountability 
Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, is amended by inserting ``a 
credit card account under'' after ``payment on''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 13, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Durum Wheat 2022

Planted Acres by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Acres

Not Estimated

< 5,000

5,000 - 9,999

10,000 - 19,999

20,000 - 39,999

40,000 - 99,999

100,000 +
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6836

ANTHONY DOVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION;

NORTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

CREDIT UNION; LYNN EUBANKS; SID PHILLIPS;

CHRISTOPHER C. HILL, Detective; LENOIR COUNTY

SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; LENOIR COUNTY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-02-25-4-H)

Submitted: October 9, 2002 Decided: January 8, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Dove, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Scott Sullivan, Jonathan

Mark Herring, WHITE & ALLEN, P.A., Kinston, North Carolina; Mark

Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Dove appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

civil action against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Dove v. North Carolina State Employees

Credit Union, No. CA-02-25-4-H (E.D.N.C. May 15, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10123

Summary Calendar

 

DANTE D’AGOSTINO, III,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

R. DREWRY ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-377-C

- - - - - - - - - -

September 21, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dante D’Agostino, III, Texas prisoner # 688309, has appealed

the district court’s order for him to pay an initial partial

filing fee relative to his civil rights action, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915. Because this is not an appealable order, the

appeal is DISMISSED. See Thompson v. Drewry, 138 F.3d 984, 985-

86 (5th Cir. 1998).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that D’Agostino’s motion to add as

appellate issues (1) whether the district court erred by

dismissing his claims against the appellees in their official 
No. 97-10123

-2-

capacities and (2) whether the magistrate judge should have

recused himself, is DENIED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); United

States v. Cooper, 135 F.3d 960, 962-63 (5th Cir. 1998).

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Theodore E. Charles, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed  this  amendment to annual report on Form 10-K of Investors
     Capital Holdings, Ltd.;

2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information included in this annual report,  fairly present in all material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are  responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
         disclosure   controls  and   procedures   to  be  designed   under  our
         supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
         registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to
         us by others within those entities,  particularly  during the period in
         which this annual report is being prepared; and

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures  and  presented  in this  report our  conclusions  about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


Date: July 14, 2005

BY: /S/ THEODORE  E. CHARLES
-----------------------------------------
Theodore E. Charles, Chairman, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)




                                       8
Exhibit 7.1



|                                                                 |  | Fiscal Year Ended August 31,          |        
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | -------
|                                                                 |  | 1998                                  |        
|                                                                 |  | (Unaudited)                           |        
|                                                                 |  | (Dollars in Thousands, Except Ratios) |        
|Earnings:                                                        |  |                                       |        
|Earnings (loss) before income taxes and non-controlling interest |  | $                                     | (14,671
|                                                                 |  |                                       |        
|Fixed Charges:                                                   |  |                                       |        
|Interest expense, net                                            |  | $                                     | 25,024 
|Deferred finance amortization                                    |  |                                       | 864    
|                                                                 |  |                                       |        
|Total Fixed Charges                                              |  | $                                     | 25,888 
|                                                                 |  |                                       |        
|Earnings plus fixed charges                                      |  | $                                     | 11,217 
|                                                                 |  |                                       |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                               |  |                                       | .43
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NOS. 2-06-401-CR

	         2-06-402-CR

GRANT MITCHELL	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On October 27, 2006, appellant Grant Mitchell pled guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and assault of a public servant.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 22.01(a), (b)(1), 22.02(a)(2) (Vernon Supp. 2006).  Pursuant to plea agreements, the trial court sentenced him to eight years’ confinement in each case, with the sentences to run concurrently.  On November 13, 2006, the trial court entered its certifications of defendant’s right to appeal in accordance with rule 25.2(a)(2).  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  The certification in each case states that the case “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

	On November 20, 2006, we notified appellant that the certifications indicating that he had no right to appeal had been filed in this court and that these appeals would be dismissed unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeals filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3.  We received a response from appellant’s counsel that does not show grounds for continuing the appeals.

	Therefore, in accordance with the trial court’s certifications, we dismiss the appeals.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 43.2(f); Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 81 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 21, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Date: Center for Inherited Disease Research 
Access Committee.
    Date: April 23, 2015.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Camilla E. Day, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, CIDR, National Human Genome Research Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4075, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-402-8837, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3152505c585d5d501f555048715f58591f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8dbd9d5d1d4d4d996dcd9c1f8d6d1d096dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 6, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst,
    Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-08213 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>