Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 77 / Monday, April 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules 23699 

for correct positioning. If the outboard 

discharge tube is not correctly 

positioned, this proposed AD would 

require correcting the positioning. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

would affect 24 U.S. registered 

helicopters and that labor costs would 

average $85 per work-hour. Based on 

these estimates, we expect the following 

costs: 

• Modifying the No. 1 engine tube 

would take two work-hours for an 

estimated labor cost of $170 per 

helicopter. No parts would be needed, 

so the cost for the U.S. fleet would total 

$4,080. 

• Inspecting the outboard discharge 

tube and ensuring that it is in the 

required position would take about one 

work-hour for a total labor cost of $85 

per helicopter. No parts would be 

needed for a total U.S. fleet cost of 

$2,040. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed, I certify 

this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska to the extent that it justifies 

making a regulatory distinction; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared an economic evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by Reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION: 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0352; Directorate 

Identifier 2012–SW–063–AD. 

(a) Applicability 

This AD applies to Sikorsky Aircraft 

Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S–92A 

helicopters, serial numbers 920006 through 

920169, certificated in any category. 

(b) Unsafe Condition 

This AD defines the unsafe condition as 

failure of the No. 1 engine forward firewall 

center fire extinguisher discharge tube to 

discharge an extinguishing agent for 

complete coverage of the No. 1 engine 

compartment area. This condition could 

result in a fire not being extinguished and 

subsequent loss of helicopter control. 

(c) Compliance 

You are responsible for performing each 

action required by this AD within the 

specified compliance time unless it has 

already been accomplished prior to that time. 

(d) Required Actions 

Within 120 days: 

(1) Modify the No. 1 engine forward 

firewall center discharge tube in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions, 

Paragraph B, of Sikorsky Alert Service 

Bulletin 92–26–004, dated June 4, 2012 

(ASB). 

(2) Inspect the outboard discharge tube and 

determine if it is correctly positioned as 

depicted in Figure 3 of the ASB. If it is not 

correctly positioned, correct the positioning 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions, Paragraph D, of the ASB. 

(e) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOC) 

(1) The Manager, Boston Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, may approve 

AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: 

Michael Schwetz, Aviation Safety Engineer, 

Boston Aircraft Certification Office, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 

01803; telephone (781) 238–7761; email 

michael.schwetz@faa.gov. 

(2) For operations conducted under a 14 

CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 

14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that 

you notify your principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office or 

certificate holding district office before 

operating any aircraft complying with this 

AD through an AMOC. 

(f) Additional Information 

For service information identified in this 

AD, contact Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, 

Attn: Manager, Commercial Technical 

Support, mailstop s581a, 6900 Main Street, 

Stratford, CT 06614; telephone (800) 562– 

4409; email tsslibrary@sikorsky.com; or at 

http://www.sikorsky.com. You may review a 

copy of information at the FAA, Office of the 

Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 

Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, 

Texas 76137. 

(g) Subject 

Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) 

Code: 2620, Extinguishing System. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 11, 

2013. 

Lance T. Gant, 

Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–09406 Filed 4–19–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Office of the Secretary 

2 CFR Part 1329 

15 CFR Part 29 

[Docket No. 0907271171–91172–01] 

RIN 0605–AA28 

Implementation of OMB Guidance on 

Drug-Free Workplace Requirements 

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce is proposing to remove its 

regulation implementing the 

Governmentwide common rule on drugfree workplace requirements for 

financial assistance, and issuing a new 

regulation to adopt the Office of 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
23700 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 77 / Monday, April 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

guidance. This regulatory action 

implements the OMB’s initiative to 

streamline and consolidate into one title 

of the CFR all Federal regulations on 

drug-free workplace requirements for 

financial assistance. These changes 

constitute an administrative 

simplification that would make no 

substantive change in U.S. Department 

of Commerce policy or procedures for 

drug-free workplace. 

DATES: Submit comments by May 22, 

2013 on any unintended changes this 

action makes in U.S. Department of 

Commerce policies and procedures for 

drug-free workplace. All comments on 

unintended changes will be considered 

and, if warranted, U.S. Department of 

Commerce will revise the rule. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by RIN 0605–AA28, by any of 

the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Gary Johnson, Office of 

Acquisition Management, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, Room H– 

6412, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same 

Address as Above. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 

for this rulemaking. All comments 

received will be posted without change 

to Regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary 

Johnson, Gjohnso3@doc.gov, 202 482– 

1679. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background 

The Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, 

Public Law 100–690, Title V, Subtitle D; 

41 U.S.C. 701, et seq., was enacted as a 

part of omnibus drug legislation on 

November 18, 1988. Federal agencies 

issued an interim final common rule to 

implement the act as it applied to grants 

(54 FR 4946, January 31, 1989). The rule 

was a subpart of the Governmentwide 

common rule on nonprocurement 

suspension and debarment. The 

agencies issued a final common rule 

after consideration of public comments 

(55 FR 21681, May 25, 1990). 

The agencies proposed an update to 

the drug-free workplace common rule in 

2002 (67 FR 3266, January 23, 2002) and 

finalized it in 2003 (68 FR 66534, 

November 26, 2003). The updated 

common rule was redrafted in plain 

language and adopted as a separate part 

independent from the common rule on 

nonprocurement suspension and 

debarment. Based on an amendment to 

the drug-free workplace requirements in 

41 U.S.C. 702 (Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, 

title VIII, Sec. 809, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 

Stat. 1838), the update also allowed 

multiple enforcement options from 

which agencies could select, rather than 

requiring use of a certification in all 

cases. 

When it established Title 2 of the CFR 

as the new central location for OMB 

guidance and agency implementing 

regulations concerning grants and 

agreements (69 FR 26276, May 11, 

2004), OMB announced its intention to 

replace common rules with OMB 

guidance that agencies could adopt in 

brief regulations. OMB began that 

process by proposing (70 FR 51863, 

August 31, 2005) and finalizing (71 FR 

66431, November 15, 2006) 

Governmentwide guidance on 

nonprocurement suspension and 

debarment in 2 CFR Part 180. 

As the next step in that process, OMB 

proposed for comment (73 FR 55776, 

September 26, 2008) and finalized (74 

FR 28149, June 15, 2009) 

Governmentwide guidance with policies 

and procedures to implement drug-free 

workplace requirements for financial 

assistance. The guidance requires each 

agency to replace the common rule on 

drug-free workplace requirements that 

the agency previously issued in its own 

CFR title with a brief regulation in 2 

CFR adopting the Governmentwide 

policies and procedures. One advantage 

of this approach is that it reduces the 

total volume of drug-free workplace 

regulations. A second advantage is that 

it collocates OMB’s guidance and all of 

the agencies’ implementing regulations 

in 2 CFR. 

The Current Regulatory Actions 

As the OMB guidance requires, the 

Department of Commerce is taking two 

regulatory actions. First, we are 

proposing to remove the drug-free 

workplace common rule from 15 CFR 

part 29. Second, to replace the common 

rule, we propose to issue a brief 

regulation in 2 CFR part 1329 to adopt 

the Governmentwide policies and 

procedures in the OMB guidance. 

Invitation to Comment 

Taken together, these regulatory 

actions are solely an administrative 

simplification and are not intended to 

make any substantive change in policies 

or procedures. In soliciting comments 

on these actions, we therefore are not 

seeking to revisit substantive issues that 

were resolved during the development 

of the final common rule in 2003. We 

are inviting comments specifically on 

any unintended changes in substantive 

content that the new part in 2 CFR 

would make relative to the common rule 

at 15 CFR part 29. 

Executive Order 12866 

OMB has determined this rule to be 

not significant for purposes of E.O. 

12866. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 

U.S.C. 605(b)) 

Pursuant to section 605(b), the Chief 

Council for Regulations certified to the 

Chief Council for Advocacy at the Small 

Business Administration that the 

attached proposed rule, if adopted, will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

The U.S. Department of Commerce is 

proposing to remove its regulation 

implementing the Governmentwide 

common rule on drug-free workplace 

requirements for financial assistance, 

currently located within Part 29 of Title 

15 of the Code of Federal Regulations 

(CFR), and issuing a new regulation to 

adopt the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) guidance at 2 CFR part 

182. This regulatory action implements 

the OMB’s initiative to streamline and 

consolidate into one title of the CFR all 

federal regulations on drug-free 

workplace requirements for financial 

assistance. This regulatory change does 

not impact any small entities as these 

changes constitute an administrative 

simplification that would make no 

substantive change in U.S. Department 

of Commerce policy or procedures for 

drug-free workplace. For the reasons set 

forth above, this action will not have a 

significant impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 (Sec. 

202, Pub. L. 104–4) 

This regulatory action does not 

contain a Federal mandate that will 

result in the expenditure by State, local, 

and tribal governments, in aggregate, or 

by the private sector of $100 million or 

more in any one year. 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C., Chapter 35) 

This regulatory action will not impose 

any additional reporting or 

recordkeeping requirements under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act. 

Federalism (Executive Order 13132) 

This proposed regulatory action does 

not have Federalism implications, as set 

forth in Executive Order 13132. It will 

not have substantial direct effects on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national government and the States, or 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 77 / Monday, April 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules 23701 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

List of Subjects 

2 CFR Part 1329 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Drug abuse, Grant programs, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

15 CFR Part 29 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Drug abuse, Grant programs, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Issued this 3rd day of April, 2013 at 

Washington, DC. 

Barry E. Berkowitz, 

Director for Acquisition Management and 

Procurement Executive. 

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth 

in the preamble, and under the 

authority of 5 U.S.C. 301 and 41 U.S.C. 

701 et seq., the U.S. Department of 

Commerce proposes to add 2 CFR 1329 

and remove 15 CFR 29 as follows: 

Title 2—Grants and Agreements 

■ 1. Add Part 1329 to Subtitle B, 

Chapter XIII, to read as follows: 

PART 1329—REQUIREMENTS FOR 

DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE 

(FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) 

Sec. 

1329.10 What does this part do? 

1329.20 Does this Part apply to me? 

1329.30 What policies and procedures 

must I follow? 

Subpart A—Purpose and Coverage 

[Reserved] 

Subpart B—Requirements for Recipients 

Other Than Individuals 

1329.225 Whom in the Department of 

Commerce does a recipient other than an 

individual notify about a criminal drug 

conviction? 

Subpart C—Requirements for Recipients 

Who Are Individuals 

1329.300 Whom in the Department of 

Commerce does a recipient who is an 

individual notify about a criminal drug 

conviction? 

Subpart D—Responsibilities of Agency 

Awarding Officials 

1329.400 What method do I use as an 

agency awarding official to obtain a 

recipient’s agreement to comply with the 

OMB guidance? 

Subpart E—Violations of This Part and 

Consequences 

1329.500 Who in the Department of 

Commerce determines that a recipient 

other than an individual violated the 

requirements of this part? 

1329.505 Who in the Department of 

Commerce determines that a recipient 

who is an individual violated the 

requirements of this part? 

Subpart F—Definitions [Reserved] 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 41 U.S.C. 701– 

707. 

§ 1329.10 What does this part do? 

This part requires that the award and 

administration of Department of 

Commerce grants and cooperative 

agreements comply with Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

guidance implementing the portion of 

the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 

(41 U.S.C. 701–707, as amended, 

hereafter referred to as ‘‘the Act’’) that 

applies to grants. It thereby— 

(a) Gives regulatory effect to the OMB 

guidance (SubParts A through F of 2 

CFR Part 182) for the Department of 

Commerce’s grants and cooperative 

agreements; and 

(b) Establishes Department of 

Commerce policies and procedures for 

compliance with the Act that are the 

same as those of other Federal agencies, 

in conformance with the requirement in 

41 U.S.C. 705 for Governmentwide 

implementing regulations. 

§ 1329.20 Does this part apply to me? 

This part and, through this part, 

pertinent portions of the OMB guidance 

in Subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 

182 (see table at 2 CFR 182.115(b)) 

apply to you if you are a— 

(a) Recipient of a Department of 

Commerce grant or cooperative 

agreement; or 

(b) Department of Commerce 

awarding official. 

§ 1329.30 What policies and procedures 

must I follow? 

(a) General. You must follow the 

policies and procedures specified in 

applicable sections of the OMB 

guidance in Subparts A through F of 2 

CFR Part 182, as implemented by this 

part. 

(b) Specific sections of OMB guidance 

that this part supplements. In 

implementing the OMB guidance in 2 

CFR part 182, this part supplements 

four sections of the guidance, as shown 

in the following table. For each of those 

sections, you must follow the policies 

and procedures in the OMB guidance, as 

supplemented by this part. 

Section of OMB guidance 

Section in this 

part where 

supplemented 

What the supplementation clarifies 

(1) 2 CFR 182.225(a) .............................. § 1329.225 Whom in the Department of Commerce a recipient other than an individual must 

notify if an employee is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute in the 

workplace. 

(2) 2 CFR 182.300(b) .............................. § 1329.300 Whom in the Department of Commerce a recipient who is an individual must notify if he or she is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation 

occurring during the conduct of any award activity. 

(3) 2 CFR 182.500 .................................. § 1329.500 Who in the Department of Commerce is authorized to determine that a recipient 

other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of 2 CFR Part 182, 

as implemented by this Part. 

(4) 2 CFR 182.505 .................................. § 1329.505 Who in the Department of Commerce is authorized to determine that a recipient 

who is an individual is in violation of the requirements of 2 CFR Part 182, as 

implemented by this Part. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
23702 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 77 / Monday, April 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

(c) Sections of the OMB guidance that 

this part does not supplement. For any 

section of OMB guidance in Subparts A 

through F of 2 CFR Part 182 that is not 

listed in paragraph (b) of this section, 

Department of Commerce policies and 

procedures are the same as those in the 

OMB guidance. 

Subpart A—Purpose and Coverage 

[Reserved] 

Subpart B—Requirements for 

Recipients Other Than Individuals 

§ 1329.225 Whom in the Department of 

Commerce does a recipient other than an 

individual notify about a criminal drug 

conviction? 

A recipient other than an individual 

that is required under 2 CFR 182.225(a) 

to notify Federal agencies about an 

employee’s conviction for a criminal 

drug offense must notify each 

Department of Commerce office from 

which it currently has an award. 

Subpart C— Requirements for 

Recipients Who Are Individuals 

§ 1329.300 Whom in the Department of 

Commerce does a recipient who is an 

individual notify about a criminal drug 

conviction? 

A recipient who is an individual and 

is required under 2 CFR 182.300(b) to 

notify Federal agencies about a 

conviction for a criminal drug offense 

must notify each Department of 

Commerce office from which it 

currently has an award. 

Subpart D—Responsibilities of Agency 

Awarding Officials 

§ 1329.400 What method do I use as an 

agency awarding official to obtain a 

recipient’s agreement to comply with the 

OMB guidance? 

To obtain a recipient’s agreement to 

comply with applicable requirements in 

the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 182, 

you must include the following term or 

condition in the award: 

Drug-free workplace. You as the 

recipient must comply with drug-free 

workplace requirements in Subpart B 

(or Subpart C, if the recipient is an 

individual) of 2 CFR part 1329, which 

adopts the Governmentwide 

implementation (2 CFR part 182) of sec. 

5152–5158 of the Drug-Free Workplace 

Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100–690, Title V, 

Subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. 701–707). 

Subpart E—Violations of this Part and 

Consequences 

§ 1329.500 Who in the Department of 

Commerce determines that a recipient other 

than an individual violated the requirements 

of this Part? 

The Secretary of Commerce or 

designee. 

§ 1329.505 Who in the Department of 

Commerce determines that a recipient who 

is an individual violated the requirements of 

this Part? 

The Secretary of Commerce or 

designee. 

Subpart F—Definitions [Reserved] 

Title 15—Commerce and Foreign Trade 

PART 29—[Removed and Reserved] 

■ 2. Remove and reserve Part 29. 

[FR Doc. 2013–09044 Filed 4–19–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–03–P 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

38 CFR Part 17 

RIN 2900–AO59 

Copayment for Extended Care 

Services 

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans 

Affairs (VA) proposes to amend how VA 

determines the ‘‘spousal resource 

protection amount,’’ which is the 

amount of liquid assets of a veteran and 

community (i.e., not institutionalized) 

spouse that is considered unavailable 

when calculating the veteran’s 

maximum monthly copayment 

obligation for extended care services 

longer than 180 days. This proposed 

rule would define the ‘‘spousal resource 

protection amount’’ by reference to the 

Maximum Community Spouse Resource 

Standard, which is published each year 

by the Centers for Medicare and 

Medicaid Services (CMS) and is 

adjusted annually based on the 

Consumer Price Index. This change 

would have the immediate effect of 

increasing the spousal resource 

protection amount from $89,280 to 

$115,920, and would ensure that the 

spousal resource protection amount 

stays consistent with the comparable 

protection for the spouses of Medicaid 

recipients. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 21, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be 

submitted through 

www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to the Director, Regulation 

Policy and Management (02REG), 

Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 

Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068, 

Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to 

(202) 273–9026. Comments should 

indicate that they are submitted in 

response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AO59— 

Copayment for Extended Care Services.’’ 

Copies of comments received will be 

available for public inspection in the 

Office of Regulation Policy and 

Management, Room 1068, between the 

hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday (except holidays). Please 

call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment. 

(This is not a toll-free number.) In 

addition, during the comment period, 

comments may be viewed online 

through the Federal Docket Management 

System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristin J. Cunningham, Director 

Business Policy, Chief Business Office, 

Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 

Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 

20420; (202) 461–1599. (This is not a 

toll-free number.) 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Certain 

veterans who receive more than 21 days 

of extended care services provided or 

paid for by VA are liable for copayments 

for the care they receive. Section 

1710B(d)(2) of title 38, United States 

Code, requires VA to develop a 

methodology to determine the amount 

of those copayments. The methodology 

must establish a maximum monthly 

copayment based on the income and 

assets of the veteran and the veteran’s 

spouse, and must protect the spouse of 

a veteran from financial hardship by 

excluding some of the income and 

assets of the veteran and spouse from 

the copayment obligation. 

VA established its methodology in 38 

CFR 17.111. Under the current rule, 

veterans who are subject to copayment 

obligations must pay $5 to $97 per day, 

depending on the type of extended care 

received, up to the maximum monthly 

copayment amount. Married veterans 

who receive over 180 days of extended 

care and who have a spouse residing in 

the community are eligible for spousal 

resource protection. The spousal 

resource protection excludes a certain 

amount of the veteran’s and spouse’s 

liquid assets, the ‘‘spousal resource 

protection amount,’’ from consideration 

in determining a veteran’s maximum 

copayment obligation. Thus, a higher 

spousal resource protection amount 

provides greater benefit to the veteran 

and spouse because it increases the 

portion of the family’s liquid assets that 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS