17388 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Notices 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for May 

2015 

The following Sunset Reviews are 

scheduled for initiation in May 2015 

and will appear in that month’s Notice 

of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review 

(‘‘Sunset Review’’). With respect to the 

countervailing duty order on Prestressed 

Concrete Wire Strand from China, we 

have advanced the initiation date of this 

Sunset Review upon determining that 

initiation of the Sunset Reviews for all 

of the Prestressed Concrete Wire Strand 

orders on the same date would promote 

administrative efficiency. 

Antidumping duty proceedings Department contact 

Barium Chloride from China (202) 482–0650 .............................................................................................. Charles Riggle (A–570–007) (4th Review). 

Floor-Standing Metal–Top Ironing Tables and Parts Thereof from China (202) 482–5255 ........................ Jacqueline Arrowsmith (A–570–888) 

(2nd Review). 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from China (202) 482–0650 ....................................................... Charles Riggle (A–570–945) (1st Review). 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy (A–475–820) (3rd Review) .................................................................. David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Japan (A–588–843) (3rd Review) .............................................................. David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Republic of Korea (A–580–829) (3rd Review) ........................................... David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Spain (A–469–807) (3rd Review) ............................................................... David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Taiwan (A–583–828) (3rd Review) ............................................................. David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from China (C–570–946) (1st Review) ....................................... David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

Suspended Investigations 

No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in May 2015.

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews provides further information 

regarding what is required of all parties 

to participate in Sunset Reviews. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Please note that if the Department 

receives a Notice of Intent to Participate 

from a member of the domestic industry 

within 15 days of the date of initiation, 

the review will continue. Thereafter, 

any interested party wishing to 

participate in the Sunset Review must 

provide substantive comments in 

response to the notice of initiation no 

later than 30 days after the date of 

initiation. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: March 25, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07498 Filed 3–31–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

automatically initiating the five-year 

review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

(‘‘AD/CVD’’) orders listed below. The 

International Trade Commission (‘‘the 

Commission’’) is publishing 

concurrently with this notice its notice 

of Institution of Five-Year Review which 

covers the same orders. 

DATES: Effective: April 1, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Department official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

For information from the Commission 

contact Mary Messer, Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission at (202) 205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) 

and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). 

Guidance on methodological or 

analytical issues relevant to the 

Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews is set forth in Antidumping 

Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final 

Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 

2012). 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(c), we are initiating Sunset 

Reviews of the following antidumping 

and countervailing duty orders: 

DOC ITC Case No. Country Product Department contact 

A–533–838 731–TA–1061 ..... India ......................... Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 (2nd Review).Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Notices 17389 

1See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

2See section 782(b) of the Act. 

3See Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 

17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’) (amending 19 CFR 

351.303(g)). 

DOC ITC Case No. Country Product Department contact 

C–533–839 701–TA–437 ....... India ......................... Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 (2nd Review).Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. 

A–560–822 731–TA–1156 ..... Indonesia ................. Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags (1st Review).David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

A–557–813 731–TA–1044 ..... Malaysia .................. Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags (2nd Review).David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

A–570–892 731–TA–1060 ..... PRC ......................... CarbazoleViolet Pigment 23 (2nd Review) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. 

A–570–002 731–TA–130 ....... PRC ......................... Chloropicrin (4th Review) .......................... Charles Riggle, (202) 482–0650. 

A–570–895 731–TA–1070–A PRC ......................... Crepe Paper (2nd Review) ........................ Charles Riggle, (202) 482–0650. 

A–570–886 731–TA–1043 ..... PRC ......................... Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags (2nd Review).David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

A–583–843 731–TA–779 ....... Taiwan ..................... Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags (1st Review).David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

A–549–821 731–TA–1045 ..... Thailand ................... Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags (2nd Review).David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

A–552–806 731–TA–1158 ..... Vietnam ................... Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags (1st Review).David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

C–552–805 701–TA–462 ....... Vietnam ................... Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags (1st Review).Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. 

With respect to the orders on 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from 

China, Malaysia and Thailand, we have 

advanced the initiation date of these 

Sunset Reviews upon determining that 

initiation of the Sunset Reviews for all 

of the Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags 

orders on the same date would promote 

administrative efficiency. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statute and Department’s 

regulations, the Department’s schedule 

for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on the Department’s Web site at 

the following address: ‘‘http://

enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/.’’ All 

submissions in these Sunset Reviews 

must be filed in accordance with the 

Department’s regulations regarding 

format, translation, and service of 

documents. These rules, including 

electronic filing requirements via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(‘‘ACCESS’’), can be found at 19 CFR 

351.303.1

Revised Factual Information 

Requirements 

This notice serves as a reminder that 

any party submitting factual information 

in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify 

to the accuracy and completeness of that 

information.2 Parties are hereby 

reminded that revised certification 

requirements are in effect for company/ 

government officials as well as their 

representatives in all AD/CVD 

investigations or proceedings initiated 

on or after August 16, 2013.3 The 

formats for the revised certifications are 

provided at the end of the Final Rule. 

The Department intends to reject factual 

submissions if the submitting party does 

not comply with the revised 

certification requirements. 

On April 10, 2013, the Department 

published Definition of Factual 

Information and Time Limits for 

Submission of Factual Information: 

Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 

2013), which modified two regulations 

related to antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings: the 

definition of factual information (19 

CFR 351.102(b)(21), and the time limits 

for the submission of factual 

information (19 CFR 351.301). The final 

rule identifies five categories of factual 

information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), 

which are summarized as follows: (i) 

Evidence submitted in response to 

questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted 

in support of allegations; (iii) publicly 

available information to value factors 

under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure 

the adequacy of remuneration under 19 

CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed 

on the record by the Department; and (v) 

evidence other than factual information 

described in (i)–(iv). The final rule 

requires any party, when submitting 

factual information, to specify under 

which subsection of 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(21) the information is being 

submitted and, if the information is 

submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information already on the 

record, to provide an explanation 

identifying the information already on 

the record that the factual information 

seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The 

final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 

so that, rather than providing general 

time limits, there are specific time limits 

based on the type of factual information 

being submitted. These modifications 

are effective for all segments initiated on 

or after May 10, 2013. Review the final 

rule, available at http://enforcement.

trade.gov/frn/2013/1304frn/2013- 

08227.txt, prior to submitting factual 

information in this segment. To the 

extent that other regulations govern the 

submission of factual information in a 

segment (such as 19 CFR 351.218), these 

time limits will continue to be applied. 

Revised Extension of Time Limits 

Regulation 

On September 20, 2013, the 

Department modified its regulation at 19 

CFR 351.302(c) concerning the 

extension of time limits for submissions 

in antidumping and countervailing duty 

proceedings: Extension of Time Limits, 

78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). The 

modification clarifies that parties may 

request an extension of time limits 

before a time limit established under 

part 351 of the Department’s regulations 

expires, or as otherwise specified by the 

Secretary. In general, an extension 

request will be considered untimely if it 

is filed after the time limit established 

under part 351 expires. For submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously, an extension request 

will be considered untimely if it is filed 

after 10 a.m. on the due date. Under 

certain circumstances, the Department 

may elect to specify a different time 

limit by which extension requests will 

be considered untimely for submissions 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

17390 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Notices 

4See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

1See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain 

Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam, 68 FR 47909 (August 12, 2003). 

2See Letter from HHFISH, ‘‘Frozen Fish Fillets 

from Vietnam—Request for New Shipper Review,’’ 

dated February 27, 2015. 

3 Id. at 2 and at Exhibit 2. 

4 Id. 

5 Id. 

6 Id. 

7 Id. at Exhibit 1. 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously. In such a case, the 

Department will inform parties in the 

letter or memorandum setting forth the 

deadline (including a specified time) by 

which extension requests must be filed 

to be considered timely. This 

modification also requires that an 

extension request must be made in a 

separate, stand-alone submission, and 

clarifies the circumstances under which 

the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time 

limits. These modifications are effective 

for all segments initiated on or after 

October 21, 2013. Review the final rule, 

available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/

pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013- 

22853.htm, prior to submitting factual 

information in these segments. 

Letters of Appearance and 

Administrative Protective Orders 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a public service list for these 

proceedings. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these five-year 

reviews must file letters of appearance 

as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To 

facilitate the timely preparation of the 

public service list, it is requested that 

those seeking recognition as interested 

parties to a proceeding submit an entry 

of appearance within 10 days of the 

publication of the Notice of Initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties who want access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) to file an APO 

application immediately following 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of initiation. The 

Department’s regulations on submission 

of proprietary information and 

eligibility to receive access to business 

proprietary information under APO can 

be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. 

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties, as 

defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), 

and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.102(b), wishing to participate in a 

Sunset Review must respond not later 

than 15 days after the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of initiation by filing a notice 

of intent to participate. The required 

contents of the notice of intent to 

participate are set forth at 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the 

Department’s regulations, if we do not 

receive a notice of intent to participate 

from at least one domestic interested 

party by the 15-day deadline, the 

Department will automatically revoke 

the order without further review.4

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in a Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Consult the Department’s 

regulations for information regarding 

the Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews. Consult the Department’s 

regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for 

definitions of terms and for other 

general information concerning 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

proceedings at the Department. 

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). 

Dated: March 25, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07500 Filed 3–31–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–801] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review; 2014–2015 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective April 1, 2015. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) received a timely 

request for a new shipper review 

(‘‘NSR’’) of the antidumping duty 

(‘‘AD’’) order on certain frozen fish 

fillets (‘‘fish fillets’’) from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’). The 

Department determines that the request 

meets the statutory and regulatory 

requirements for initiation. The period 

of review (‘‘POR’’) for this NSR is 

August 1, 2014, through January 31, 

2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexander Montoro, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office V, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: 202–482–0238. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The AD order on fish fillets from 

Vietnam was published in the Federal 

Register on August 12, 2003.1 On 

February 27, 2015, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR 

351.214(b), the Department received an 

NSR request from Hai Huong Seafood 

Joint Stock Company (‘‘HHFISH’’).2

HHFISH certified that it is a producer 

and exporter of the subject merchandise 

and that it exported, or sold for export, 

subject merchandise to the United 

States.3

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), 

HHFISH certified that it did not export 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the period of investigation 

(‘‘POI’’).4 In addition, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), HHFISH 

certified that, since the initiation of the 

investigation, it has never been affiliated 

with any Vietnamese exporter or 

producer who exported subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POI, including those respondents 

not individually examined during the 

investigation.5 As required by 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), HHFISH also 

certified that its export activities were 

not controlled by the central 

government of Vietnam.6

In addition to the certifications 

described above, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iv), HHFISH submitted 

documentation establishing the 

following: (1) The date on which it first 

shipped subject merchandise for export 

to the United States; (2) the volume of 

its first shipment; and (3) the date of its 

first sale to an unaffiliated customer in 

the United States.7

Finally, the Department conducted a 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) database query and confirmed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES