alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.10


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


                  KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Eric W. Golden, Bobby G. Jenkins and Barry F.
Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the PANAVISION INC. (the
"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and
on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or
officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any
instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the
Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of
attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable
securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has signed these
presents this 18th day of March, 2004.



                                                      /S/ KENNETH ZIFFREN
                                                     --------------------
                                                     KENNETH ZIFFREN
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JULY 3, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-15619 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00039-RH-WCS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

ROBERT BRUCE GREEN, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Northern District of Florida

 ________________________

(July 3, 2012)

Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Robert Bruce Green, Jr., in this
direct appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant,

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Green’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

2
EXHIBIT 23.2

                          NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.

                                  Exhibit 23.2

                        Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

                                      127

<PAGE>


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-42477) on Form S-8 of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March
18, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of NeoMedia Technologies,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders' equity for the year then
ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form
10-KSB of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.



/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
-------------------------
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Miami, Florida
March 30, 1998

                                      128
Exhibit 13.2  Section 906 Certification  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, a chartered corporation incorporated under the laws of Ireland (Bank of Ireland), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) of The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bank of Ireland.   Date: 24 June 2011Name: John ODonovanTitle: Group Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                      [BEDERSON & COMPANY LLP LETTERHEAD]
                                                             EXHIBIT 23.1  
                               


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the inclusion of both our report dated September 16, 1997 except
for notes 1, 17,20,22, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30 and 31, as to which date is March 6,
1998 on our audits of the financial statement of Swissray International, Inc.
for the years ended June 30, 1997 and 1996 in Swissray International, Inc.'s
Form 10KSB/A for the year ended June 30, 1997.



                                                  /s/ Bederson & Company LLP
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  BEDERSON & COMPANY LLP




West Orange, New Jersey
March 16, 1998
# CENTCOM: SPP underscores commitment to regional stability

/ Published Dec. 14, 2018

MacDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. – A National Guard-administered program that has paired states with foreign nations around the world since 1993 continues to strengthen defense relations in the Middle East and Central Asia.

At the core of the State Partnership Program: Building relationships to complement the command's theater campaign plan and the National Defense Strategy, said Air Force Maj. Gen. Jon Mott, U.S. Central Command's director of exercises and training, speaking at a National Guard birthday celebration here Dec 13.

The Guard's unique capabilities, matched with being "combat-tested, seamless and readiness-focused," set the foundation for enduring relationships with partners around the world, Mott said.

For instance, homeland defense – a mission exclusive to the National Guard – often serves as a relationship bloodline with foreign militaries that are responsible for both emergency response and national security in their own nations, Mott said. Through SPP engagements, Guard units can earn the access and influence that can benefit shared security objectives.

Another unique element of SPP is the predictability of the Guard itself.

"Unlike active component personnel who are reassigned every few years, National Guard personnel typically belong to the same state for their entire career," said U.S. Army Maj. Roger Hoselton, CENTCOM's National Guard Bureau liaison and SPP manager. "The continuity inherent to the National Guard is a significant benefit to building partnerships ... as personnel on both sides rise up through the ranks over the years."

SPP currently boasts 79 partnerships, each unique in terms of goals, scope and frequency of exchanges.

Hoselton manages CENTCOM's six partnerships, which range from the Arizona-Kazakhstan bond that was established in 1993 to the West Virginia-Qatar relationship forged earlier this year, he said. Engagements can focus on battle staff operations, aircraft maintenance or even support other forms of security cooperation such as foreign military sales and foreign military financing cases.

One of CENTCOM's strongest partnerships is between Colorado and Jordan, whose aviation units were working together well before their relationship was formalized in 2004, Hoselton said.

Since then, they have conducted more than 280 SPP-sanctioned exchanges in a variety of areas of interest, said Jordan Armed Forces Brig. Gen. Abdallah Hunaiti, director of planning and organization. Today, Colorado and Jordan average 15-20 engagements annually, such as Eager Lion, the command's largest and most complex exercise.

And while the 15-year partners still use interpreters to help bridge the language barrier, the two commands have bonded culturally by building trust and understanding over time, said U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Greg White, director of Colorado National Guard's Joint Staff.

"We are extremely pleased with our partnership," White said. "We have become a family whose brothers and sisters have worked side-by-side to learn from each other and improve our skills."
#### Leininger’s Liquor License Application.

*Liquor law*— Application *for license*— Act *of May 5,1921.*

1. Under the Amendment of 1921, P. L. 407, to the Brooks High License Law, two questions must be considered by the court, the fitness of the applicant and the fitness of the place.

2. The fitness of the place embraces more than the fitness of the'building. The surroundings and everything that has a bearing upon the fitness of the place for the purpose as considered from a community standpoint should be considered.

3. The fact that the prior holder of the license has violated the law will also be considered in passing on the application.

Application for license to sell liquor. Q. S. Lebanon Co., Jan. Sess., 1922, No. 8.

*Clarence D. Becker,*for applicant.

Jan. 16, 1922.

Henry, P. J.,

The petitioner has asked for a license to sell liquor under the Brooks High License Law and its Amendment of 1921. Under this amendment, the power of the court in the matter of granting licenses has been greatly restricted, and the two questions for the court’s decision are the fitness of the applicant and the fitness of the place.

This applicant comes before the court with the strongest recommendations. He has had experience. He has strong endorsement and recommendation from people of the highest standing in the community, as well as from those in communities in which he has lived heretofore. The building is adapted for all the needs of a place of this character at this location, but, we take it, the fitness of the place embraces more than the mere fitness of the building. The surroundings and everything that may have a bearing upon the fitness of the place for the purpose, as considered from a community standpoint, should be considered. This house is within half a square, or possibly a few feet more, of three churches, and the Perseverance Fire Engine House is next door. The house is not large, cannot accommodate many hotel guests, and there cannot be any great demand for any accommodation of this character; but the proximity of this fire-engine house, considered in connection with high-powered motor fire apparatus and the poison now frequently sold as liquor, make a place of this kind a public menace if conducted in violation of law, and all this is strongly controlling in passing upon the fitness of this place for the license requested. Another consideration is the fact that the prior holder of the license has violated the law. The disposition of this court will be to refuse to relicense such places as have lost the privilege by reason of violation of the law. This is not to be a hard and fast rule, for there may be exceptions, but they will only be in such cases where the public interest outweighs that of the individual applicant and the individual owner. For these considerations, the court must adjudge this place not a fit and proper place for a license to sell liquor.

And now, to wit, Jan. 16, 1922, the application for a license is hereby refused.

From Dawson W. Light, Lebanon, Fa,
#### ALBERT M. PETT and THOMAS REYNOLDS, Plaintiffs in Error, *vs.*ABRAM F. CLARK, Defendant in Error.

ERROR TO DANE CIRCUIT COURT.

A default cannot be entered against two defendants after-one of them has pleaded. A default so entered is irregular against the defendant pleading.

If a party plead before default entered, though out of time, or without leave, if the plea he good in substance and form, his default cannot be entered while the plea stands. The proper practice in such case is, to move to strike the plea from the files.

The facts in tbis case are sufficiently stated indbe opinion of tbe court.

*Abbott, Clarh & Coit,*for tbe plaintiffs in error.

*Enos &*Hall, for tbe defendants in error.

*By the Court,*

Smith, J.

Tbis was an action of assumpsit commenced in tbe Circuit Court of Jefferson county, by tbe defendant in error against tbe plaintiffs in error. Tbe declaration was in tbe common counts, and was filed January 8tb, 1855. On tbe 19tb day of February, 1855, tbe defendant Reynolds filed bis plea of tbe general issue, together witb notice of set-off. On tbe 14th day of September, A. D. 1855, tbe default of both tbe defendants having been entered, a writ of inquiry was issued to tbe sheriff, which was returned witb an assessment of tbe plaintiff’s damages at $150.04 ; and on tbe 15th day of March, 1856, in term time, final judgment was rendered against both tbe defendants for tbe amount of damages returned as aforesaid.

It appears from tbe record that tbe default of both tbe de*199fendants was entered after one of them had filed his plea. For aught that appears, the plea was regularly filed; at all events, it was good in substance and in form, and constituted a part of the record, and while there a default could not be entered against the defendant pleading it. If pleaded out of time, or if leave was not obtained, or if there was any reason why rhe defendant ought not to have been allowed to plead, the proper practice would have been to move to strike the plea from the files. Having done so, and the motion having been sustained, the default could be entered, but not while the plea remained on the files as a part of the record in the case.

The existence of the plea was doubtless overlooked in the hurry of circuit practice. But the entry of the default and assessment of damages was irregular, and the judgment must therefore be reversed.
Exhibit 32.2(1)

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I,
Shelly Schaffer, the chief financial officer of support.com, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



|(i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                   
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ SHELLY SCHAFFER                                                                               
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Shelly Schaffer Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of
Finance and Administration

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to
support.com, Inc. and will be retained by support.com, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|(1) | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant
specifically incorporates it by reference.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1
------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three month
period year ended September 30, 2004 of Xinhua China Ltd., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Xianping Wang, President, Chief
Executive Officer and a director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Dated: November 22, 2004                     /s/ Xianping Wang
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Xianping Wang, President, CEO and a
                                             Director
# Alabama kids reach out to Alabama military kids

/ Published Nov. 12, 2009

MONTGOMERY, Ala. - The deployment of a Soldier affects no one more than a child. Children of the brave men and women, who protect the liberties and freedoms of the United States of American often suffer and sacrifice in silence. 

They try to be brave for their mommies and daddies and their brothers and sisters, but it’s hard for them to understand the emotional, mental and physiological characteristics associated with the burdens of a deployment. 

"When a Soldier is mobilized or deployed, a large portion of time is spent on preparing the soldier and the family for what to expect,” said Kelli Hill, child and youth coordinator for the Alabama National Guard’s Child and Youth program. "A lot of times the children are overlooked during that preparation process, even though their lives are literally turned upside down. Deployment never affects every child or teen the same way.” 

Some of the children may show signs of depression or anger while others might be more mature or grow closer to siblings and other family members, Hill said.

"One of the goals of the ALNG Child and Youth program is to provide support and education to children and teens during deployment,” said Hill. 

Yellow Ribbon events provide the ALNG Child and Youth program with an opportunity to educate them on what to expect during the deployment. 

"We educate them on stress management, time management, anger management, and several other topics in a fun and educational environment,” said Hill. It also offers the children with an opportunity to connect with other kids and teens their same age that are going through the same kind of experiences.

Another way the ALNG Child and Youth program offers support to the children is by providing Hero Packs. With the help of Operation Military Kids (OMK), each deploying Soldier’s child receives a Hero Pack at a Yellow Ribbon event. 

Put together by non-military youth, Hero Packs are a tangible expression of support from the communities and OMK partners.

The backpacks are filled with a collection of family support materials, communication tools, and fun items such as a cameras, stuffed animals or Frisbees. Also included are handwritten letters and cards from non-military youth thanking the children for their service and sacrifices they make for our country. 

"It is important that our children not be overlooked during a deployment,” said Hill. "They need the support of their schools, educators, churches and the communities.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements as of July 31, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                  JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                                            133,000
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   6,907,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      803,000
<INVENTORY>                                                     7,079,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               14,356,000
<PP&E>                                                            807,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    570,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 22,931,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           9,658,000
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                       17,591,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   22,931,000
<SALES>                                                        18,763,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               18,763,000
<CGS>                                                          10,958,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  10,958,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                8,080,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                399,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (674,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (674,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (674,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (0.20)


</TABLE>