alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08181]



[[Page 19285]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD894


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Fisheries of the 
Northeastern United States; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish (MSB) Advisory Panel (AP) will 
meet to review recent fishery performance and develop Fishery 
Performance Reports and/or other recommendations for the Atlantic 
Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish fisheries in preparation for the 
Council's setting of MSB specifications at the June 2015 Council 
meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be Monday, April 27, 2015 at 12:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar, but anyone can also 
attend at the Council office address (see below). The webinar link is: 
http://mafmc.adobeconnect.com/2015msbap/. Please call the Council at 
least 24 hours in advance if you wish to attend at the Council office.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State St., Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D. Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: (302) 
526-5255. The Council's Web site, www.mafmc.org will also have details 
on webinar access and any background materials.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to create 
Fishery Performance Reports by the Council's Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, 
and Butterfish (MSB) Advisory Panel (AP). The intent of these reports 
is to facilitate structured input from the Advisory Panel members into 
the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish specifications process.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to M. Jan Saunders, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.

    Dated: April 6, 2015.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-08181 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of In Full Affect,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Daniel
L. Hodges,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Larry Greene

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICER

777 12 th Street, 3 rd Floor * Sacramento, CA 95814-1908 916/874-4800 * 916/874-4899 fax www.airquality.org December 17, 2010

Mr. Michael Guzzetta Stationary Source Division California Air Resources Board PO Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812

Subject: State Implementation Plan Revision, SMAQMD Rule 448

Dear Mr. Guzzetta:

Enclosed is the information necessary for submittal of Rule 448, Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage Containers, for revision to the State Implementation Plan. Rule 448 was amended by the District’s Board of Directors on February 26, 2009. Please also forward the information for this submittal to U.S. EPA.

If you have any comments or questions, please contact me at (916) 874-4851.

Sincerely,

Kevin J. Williams, Ph.D. Program Coordinator (sent via e-mail)

Attachments:

1. SIP Checklist Rule 448 2. Final Version of Rule 448 3. Underline/Strikeout Version of Rule 448 4. Public Notice Evidence 5. Resolution 6. Public Comments 7. Rule Evaluation Form 8. Board Memo 

### 9. Staff Report (includes responses to comments)
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-3467NI

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* On Appeal from the United

v. * States District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

*

Robert Wade, * [To be published]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 11, 1999

Filed: May 21, 1999

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §2255 in which the appellant, Robert

Wade, seeks to have his conviction on drug charges set aside. The conviction was

previously affirmed on direct appeal. See United States v. Wade, 1992 W.L. 301953

(8th Cir., October 23, 1992) (No. 92-2173). 

Mr. Wade's major arguments have to do with the performance of his counsel at

the time of sentencing. This performance, he says, was deficient, and the deficiency
1The Hon. John A. Jarvey, United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa. 

2The Hon. David R. Hansen, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit,

sitting by designation. 

-2-

was such as to undermine confidence in the outcome of the sentencing proceedings.

Both a Magistrate Judge1 and the District Court2 have written thorough opinions

painstakingly examining each of the arguments advanced by Wade. We have nothing

of substance to add, and see no reason to encumber the record with still another

detailed discussion of the parties' contentions. Accordingly, the judgment will be

affirmed on the basis of the District Court's opinion. 

In addition to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims and certain other

arguments, defendant makes an Ex Post Facto Clause argument, claiming that

Guidelines §3B1.1, as it existed at the time of the commission of the offense, did not

allow consideration of relevant conduct in connection with a defendant's role in the

offense. This argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Larson, 110

F.3d 620, 627 n.8 (8th Cir. 1997). 

Affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3643 

To make technical corrections to section 3013(b) of the Water Resources 

Development Act of 2007. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 

Mr. ALEXANDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To make technical corrections to section 3013(b) of the 

Water Resources Development Act of 2007. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, ARKAN4 SAS AND LOUISIANA. 

5 Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of August 18, 

6 1941 (55 Stat. 642), as amended by section 3013(b) of 

7 the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 

8 1109), is further amended by striking ‘‘the first section 

9 of the Mississippi River Flood Control Act of May 15, 

10 1928 (45 Stat. 534),’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘the 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3643 IH

1 first section and section 6 of the Mississippi River Flood 

2 Control Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534), and any 

3 other provision of law,’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
FEBRUARY CROP PRODUCTION

Executive Summary

February 10, 2014 12:00 PM

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service
• Citrus Fruits

• Sugarcane

USDA-NASS 

 02-10-14

Contents
USDA-NASS 

02-10-14

February 2014 Crop Production

Crop Unit

February

2014

% Change

from 

Previous

Forecast

% Change

from 

Previous

Season

Oranges Mil Tons 7.39 NC -11.5

Grapefruit Mil Tons 1.10 2.0 -7.3

Tangerines and 

 Mandarins Thou Tons 702 0.6 2.6

Tangelos Thou Tons 36.0 -20.0 -20.0

Sugarcane Mil Tons 32.2 <-0.1 -0.1
USDA-NASS 

02-10-14

Upcoming Reports 

February 14 Crop Values

February 20 2012 Census of Agriculture – Preliminary

February 21 Cattle on Feed

February 28 Agricultural Prices

March 10 Crop Production

March 28 Agricultural Prices

Hogs and Pigs

March 31 Prospective Plantings

Grain Stocks

Rice Stocks

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Xinhua  China  LTD.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Xianping  Wang,  Acting as  Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 13, 2007



                                        By: /s/ XIANPING WANG
                                            _____________________________
                                                Xianping Wang
                                                Acting as Interim Chief
                                                Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7248

MARCO OWENS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WARDEN WASHINGTON; HEAD QUARTERS CLASSIFICATION; OFFICER COKLY; DIRECTOR BRYAN STERLING; MAJOR OCEAN , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv - 00476

- BHH )

Submitted : February 18, 2021 Decided: February 22, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Remand ed by un published per curiam opinion

. Marco Owens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 20-7248 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/22/2021 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Marco Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Owens’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note a n appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). However, if a party moves for an extension of time to appeal within 30 day s after expiration of the original appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect or good cause, a district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A); Washington v. Bumgarner , 882 F.2d 899, 900

- 01 (4th Cir. 1989). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on June 19, 2020. Owens filed his notice of appeal after the expiration of the 30

- day appeal period but within the 30

- day excusable neglect period. Because Owens’ notice of appeal contained language re questing further time to file his appeal, we construe it as a request for an extension of time under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). Accordingly, although we deny Owens’ motions to amend the complaint and to assign counsel, we remand this case to the district co urt for the limited purpose of determining whether Owens’ request for extension of time was timely filed and, if so, whether he has demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the 30

- day appeal period. The record, as supplement ed, may then be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED USCA4 Appeal: 20-7248 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/22/2021 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the registrant.



|                    |  |  |  |                                              
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Ronald Leon Moore                        
|                    |  |  |  | Ronald Leon Moore                            
|                    |  |  |  | Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer



|                    |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ J. Alan Dickerson                            
|                    |  |  |  | J. Alan Dickerson                                
|                    |  |  |  | Vice President, Cashier
& Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 21****DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION****EXHIBIT 21 — SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**     The following is a list of subsidiaries of Direct General Corporation atDecember 31, 2006. All corporations are subsidiaries of Direct GeneralCorporation and, if indented, subsidiaries of the company under which they arelisted.     Name of Company Incorporated Direct Adjusting Company, Inc. TNDirect Administration, Inc. TNDirect General Agency of Georgia, Inc. GADirect General Agency of Kentucky, Inc. KYDirect General Consumer Products, Inc. TNDirect General Financial Services,Inc. TNDirect General Insurance Agency of Louisiana, Inc. LADirect General Insurance Agency of North Carolina, Inc. NCDirect General Insurance Agency of South Carolina, Inc. SCDirect General Insurance Agency of Tennessee, Inc. TNDirect General Insurance Agency, Inc. ARDirect General Insurance Agency, Inc. MSDirect General Insurance Agency, Inc. TNDirect General Insurance Agency, Inc. TXDirect General Insurance Company SCDirect General Insurance Company of Mississippi MSDirect General Life Insurance Company SCDirect Life Insurance Company GADirect General Insurance Company of Louisiana LADirect General Premium Finance Company TNDirect Insurance Company TNDirect National Insurance Company ARRight Choice Insurance Agency, Inc. TN     The names of certain subsidiaries are omitted; as such subsidiaries in the aggregate would notconstitute a significant subsidiary.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Hassan M. Ahmed, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

(a)   All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

|Date: May 8, 2008 |  | /s/HASSAN M. AHMEDHassan M. Ahmed President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 18, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60584 Summary Calendar

JOSE DAVID MORALES-GUERRA, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A78 314 975

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose David Morales-Guerra (Morales), a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of Morales’s application for withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This court usually reviews only the BIA’s decision, not that of the IJ, except to the extent that the IJ’s decision influences the BIA. Mikhael v. INS , 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). Because the BIA adopted and affirmed the IJ’s decision, however,No. 04-60584 -2- the IJ’s decision is the final agency determination for judicial review. Id. To obtain withholding of removal under the INA, an applicant “must show that it is more likely than not that his life or freedom would be threatened by persecution,” based on his political opinion, race, religion, nationality, or membership in a particular social group. Efe v. Ashcroft , 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002) (quotation marks omitted). We review for substantial evidence the determination that an alien is not entitled to withholding of removal. See id. at 905-06. Morales contends that the IJ erred by determining that he had not shown it was more likely than not he would be subjected to persecution because of his former employment as a police officer, if he returned to El Salvador. The record does not compel a finding that Morales met his burden to show that he was entitled to withholding of removal under the INA. See Roy v. Ashcroft , 389 F.3d 132, 138-39 (5th Cir. 2004). Thus, Morales has failed to show that the IJ’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. See Mikhael , 115 F.3d at 302. The petition for review is DENIED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JD AUTO CORP.

,

Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL H. BELL

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00187

- CV

Appeal from the

384th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2021DCV0743 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and render judgment for Appellant

on its bill of review based on a violation of its due process rights . We further vacate the 2016

default judgment and return the parties to their original status as plaintiff and defendant in

Appellee’s employment suit with Appellee carrying the burden of proving his employment

discrimination claim.

We further order that Appellant recover from Appellee all costs of appeal for which let

execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 20 24

.

GINA M. PALAFOX

, Justice

Before Alley

, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ ., and Rodriguez, C.J. (Senior Judge) (en banc)

Soto, J., concurring

Rodriguez, C.J. (Senior Judge), dissenting
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kushi Natural Foods Corp. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Yi Tang, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


November 21, 2005


By: /S/ YI TANG
    ------------
    Yi Tang, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer