alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dan Scouler certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NUI Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: May 25, 2004

                                 /s/ Dan Scouler
                         Interim Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, EllenB. Richstone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date: August 9, 2007 |                                                                       |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ Ellen B. Richstone                                                     |
|                      | Ellen B. Richstone  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.69

 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION ON CDMA 2000-IX
    EQUIPMENT IN DIVRE V EAST JAVA NO. K.TEL. 396/HK920/ITS-00/2006, DATED 18
                                  DECEMBER 2006

<TABLE>
<S>                     <C>
The Parties:            1.   TELKOM; and

                        2.   SAMSUNG Consortium ("Consortium").

Preceding Agreement:    1.   Agreement for Procurement and  Installation on CDMA
                             2000-1X  Equipment in Divre V East Java No.
                             K.TEL.107/HK910/ITS-00/2006 dated 8 June 2006;

                        2.   First Amendment No. K.TEL. 179/HK910/ITS-00/2006
                             dated 1 August 2006.

Amended Provision:      The parties agree to amend the contract price.
</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3612 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive the 10 percent 

penalty with respect to early retirement distributions for certain unemployed individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 

Mr. BROUN of Georgia (for himself, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, and Mr. KINGSTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive 

the 10 percent penalty with respect to early retirement 

distributions for certain unemployed individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Retirement Savings 

5 Access Act of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3612 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF 10 PERCENT PENALTY FOR CERTAIN 

2 UNEMPLOYMENT DISTRIBUTIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 72(t) of 

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

5 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

6 ‘‘(H) UNEMPLOYMENT DISTRIBUTIONS.— 

7 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Any distribution 

8 to an individual after separation from em9 ployment— 

10 ‘‘(I) from an individual retire11 ment plan, or from amounts attrib12 utable to employer contributions made 

13 pursuant to elective deferrals de14 scribed in subparagraph (A) or (C) of 

15 section 402(g)(3) or in section 

16 501(c)(18)(D)(iii), 

17 ‘‘(II) if such individual has re18 ceived unemployment compensation 

19 for 26 consecutive weeks for any Fed20 eral or State Unemployment com21 pensation law by reason of such sepa22 ration, and 

23 ‘‘(III) if such distributions are 

24 made during any taxable year during 

25 which such employment compensation 

26 is paid. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3612 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) DISTRIBUTIONS AFTER REEM2 PLOYMENT.—Clause (i) shall not apply to 

3 any distribution made after the individual 

4 has been employed for at least 60 days 

5 after the separation from employment to 

6 which clause (i) relates. 

7 ‘‘(iii) SELF-EMPLOYED INDIVID8 UALS.—To the extent provided in regula9 tions, a self-employed individual shall be 

10 treated as meeting the requirements of 

11 clause (i)(II) if, under Federal or State 

12 law, the individual would have received un13 employment compensation but for the fact 

14 the individual was self-employed.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 this section shall apply to distributions made after the 

17 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Xinhua  China  LTD.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Xianping  Wang,  Acting as  Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: February 22, 2010


                                       By: /s/ XIANPING WANG
                                       _________________________________________
                                       Xianping Wang
                                       Acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.8



 Exhibit 10.8 
 Amendment to 
 2011-2013 and 2012-2014 

Performance Unit Award Agreement 
 Pursuant to the Symetra Financial Corporation Equity Plan 
 Symetra
Financial Corporation and the undersigned Participant are parties to a Performance Unit Award Agreement(s) (“Agreement”) issued to Participant pursuant to the Symetra Financial Corporation Equity Plan. In order to align the Agreement with
the Symetra Financial Corporation Executive Severance Pay Plan, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 
 1. The first sentence of Section 7 is amended to replace “Except as provided in Sections 7(b) and 8” with “Except as provided in Sections 7(b) and (c) and 8”. 

2. A new section 7(c) is added, reading as follows: 

(c) In the event of a termination of employment that entitles the Participant to severance under the Executive Severance Pay Plan, then
with respect to Performance Units that were outstanding on the date of the Termination Without Cause or the Constructive Termination, each such Performance Unit shall be immediately canceled and, in respect thereof, the Participant shall be entitled
to receive a payment equal to the product of (i) the number of Performance Units as to which at least 12 months of the Award Period has been completed, multiplied by (ii) the Value of a Performance Unit on the date the Termination Without
Cause or the Constructive Termination occurs, multiplied by (iii) a Performance Percentage determined based on the extent to which the Performance Objective has been achieved as of the last day of the calendar quarter ending prior to the date
the Termination Without Cause or the Constructive Termination occurs. For purposes of clause (ii) above, the Value of a Performance Unit shall be calculated pursuant to the second sentence of Section 3 above, except that the Value shall be
annualized through the last day of the calendar quarter ending prior to the date of the Termination Without Cause or the Constructive Termination. 
  

			
	 SYMETRA FINANCIAL CORPORATION

	
	 





	By	 	 Christine Katzmar Holmes

	Its	 	Senior Vice President


  

			
	 PARTICIPANT:

	  

	Name
#### Woodward vs. Garner.

1. Justice’s court — jurisdiction. Under the Organic Act limiting tlie jurisdiction oí justices of the peace, a justice of the peace has no jurisdiction of an action founded upon an account for a greater sum than $50 though the amount of the account may have been reduced to less than $50 by payments or credits.

2. Jurisdiction— practice. A want of jurisdiction maybe taken advantage of at any stage of the proceedings, prior to final judgment.

ERROR to the “District Court for *Ch'ant*County.

The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

*Barker &*Dewey, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

Irviu, J.

This case originated before a justice of the peace in Grant county, who rendered a judgment therein for the defendant, for the sum of twenty-seven cents and the costs of suit, upon which the plaintiff obtained a writ of certiorari, and removed the cause into the district court for that county, where the judgment was reversed, and one given for the plaintiff for the sum of $3.79 and the costs of suit, to which judgment the plaintiff in error took exception, and sued out a writ of error, upon which the case has been brought to this court.

The only point now raised and brought to the consideration of the court in this case is one of jurisdiction. Upon examination of the account of the plaintiff below, upon which suit was brought, it is found to amount to the sum of $57.47, upon which there are credits amounting to $30.48. The defendant filed an account in set-off amounting to $49.95. The question of jurisdiction was not raised, in the district court, and is here made for the first time. By the organic law, the jurisdiction of justices of the peace is limited to the sum of $50, and the account of the plaintiff amounting to a greater sum, the justice was necessarily ousted of jurisdiction, notwithstanding the credit which the plaintiff had given upon the account, *29as the total amount of the account formed the subject of inquiry and adjudication. This principle was declared in the case of *Barker v. Baxter, ante,*in which all the authorities relied on are cited. It is never too late to take advantage of a want of jurisdiction, at any stage of the proceedings, previous to a final judgment. See the decision of this court in the case of *Dewey v. Hyde, ante.*We therefore recognize the exception as taken in due time, and accordingly reverse the judgment of the district court, and direct that the case be dismissed by that court for want of jurisdiction, and that it be so certified to that court, to be carried into execution.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Airspan Networks Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),





I,
      David
      Brant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 8, 2007





By:
            /s/
                DAVID BRANTDavid
                Brant*Chief
                Financial Officer*





**A
      signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Airspan Networks Inc. and will be retained by Airspan Networks Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.**




1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                     Subsidiaries of deCODE genetics, Inc.

1.   Islensk erfdagreining ehf., an Icelandic private limited company (English
name: deCODE genetics ehf,)



                   Subsidiaries of Islensk erfdagreining ehf.

1.   Islenskar lyfjarannsoknir ehf., an Icelandic private limited company
(English name: Encode ehf.)

2.   Cyclops ehf., an Icelandic private limited company

3.   Islenskar krabbameinsrannsoknir ehf., an Icelandic private limited company
(English name: deCODE Cancer ehf.)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3663 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3663

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to delay the date on 
 which the accreditation requirement under the Medicare Program applies 
     to suppliers of durable medical equipment that are pharmacies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MEDICARE DME ACCREDITATION DEADLINE FOR CERTAIN 
PHARMACIES.
    (a) In General.--Section 1834(a)(20)(F)(i) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(20)(F)(i)) is amended by inserting before the 
semicolon the following: ``, except that the Secretary shall not 
require under this clause pharmacies to obtain such accreditation 
before January 1, 2010''.
    (b) Construction.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as 
affecting the application of an accreditation requirement for 
pharmacies to qualify for bidding in a competitive acquisition area 
under section 1847 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-3).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 1, 2021

b0524

Order 

Clerk

June 1, 2021

161888

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161888

COA: 353352

St Joseph CC: 12-018185-FH

PATRICK EUGENE SCARBERRY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 29, 2020 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7248

MARCO OWENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WARDEN 

WASHINGTON; HEAD QUARTERS CLASSIFICATION; OFFICER COKLY; 

DIRECTOR BRYAN STERLING; MAJOR OCEAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. 

Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00476-BHH)

Submitted: February 18, 2021 Decided: February 22, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marco Owens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-7248 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/22/2021 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Marco Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation and dismissing Owens’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Parties are 

accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an 

appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). 

However, if a party moves for an extension of time to appeal within 30 days after expiration 

of the original appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect or good cause, a district 

court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A); Washington 

v. Bumgarner, 882 F.2d 899, 900-01 (4th Cir. 1989). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on June 19, 2020. Owens filed 

his notice of appeal after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period but within the 30-day 

excusable neglect period. Because Owens’ notice of appeal contained language requesting 

further time to file his appeal, we construe it as a request for an extension of time under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). Accordingly, although we deny Owens’ motions to amend the 

complaint and to assign counsel, we remand this case to the district court for the limited 

purpose of determining whether Owens’ request for extension of time was timely filed and, 

if so, whether he has demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause warranting an 

extension of the 30-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, may then be returned 

to this court for further consideration. 

REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 20-7248 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/22/2021 Pg: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3606 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3606

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Truth in Lending Act to make a technical correction to an 
             amendment made by the Credit CARD Act of 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Credit CARD Technical Corrections 
Act of 2009''.
SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.
    Section 163(a) of the Truth in Lending Act (U.S.C. 1666b(a)), as 
amended by section 106(b) of the Credit Card Accountability 
Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, is amended by inserting ``a 
credit card account under'' after ``payment on''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Lennon,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ JOHN LENNON
John Lennon
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2006