alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mississippi, Republic of Uzbekistan Celebrate 10-Year Partnership
 
  By Mississippi National Guard Public Affairs
  WASHINGTON - The Mississippi National Guard and the Republic of Uzbekistan celebrated the 10th anniversary of joining forces under the State Partnership Program during a reception at the Uzbekistan Embassy Dec. 12. Maj. Gen. Janson D. Boyles, adjutant general, and other senior leaders from the Mississippi Army and Air National Guard attended to commemorate the partnership. “We greatly cherish our partnership with Mississippi that for the past years has grown and expanded as never before,” said Vladimir Norov, minister of foreign affairs of Uzbekistan. “It started with a mutual desire to enhance military-to-military partnership.” The State Partnership Program is a Department of Defense National Guard Bureau security cooperation program that establishes a military relationship between a state’s National Guard and a partner country’s military. Other program goals include building enduring relationships, interoperability and readiness. Boyles said the Mississippi National Guard and Uzbekistan had conducted 200 partnership engagements over 10 years, including key leader meetings, military-to-military exchanges and exercises. “I am grateful for our steadfast partnership with Uzbekistan, and the Mississippi National Guard looks forward to continuing our partnership and building relationships for many more decades to come,” he said. Mississippi and Uzbekistan have celebrated several milestones during the partnership. In 2018, Mississippi hosted Uzbekistan senators to discuss trade and industry partnerships. In 2019, representatives from Mississippi, including the governor, agriculture commissioner and adjutant general, met in Uzbekistan with leaders of the country to discuss opportunities for trade, education and economic development. In April 2021, Uzbekistan soldiers participated alongside Mississippi National Guard’s 2nd Battalion, 20th Special Forces Group, in their first joint airborne operation. Gen. Daniel Hokanson, chief of the National Guard Bureau, and Lt. Gen. Michael A. Loh, director of the Air National Guard, observed the jump. The Mississippi Guard and Uzbekistan have had subject matter expert exchanges, bilateral conferences, and partnerships between universities in Mississippi and Uzbekistan. The Uzbekistan military also joined  Southern Strike, Patriot South, Ardent Sentry and Regional Cooperation exercises, Best Warrior Competitions, disaster response and soldier development training. “We look forward to expanding our foreign partner’s participation in Mississippi-hosted exercises in 2023,” said Lt. Col. Amanda Villeret, director of the Mississippi State Partnership Program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages F-3 and F-4 of the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,258     
<PP&E>                                               0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,483    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                         773 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,483   
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,602)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection
with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)
the Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
 applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
 the dates and for the periods indicated.  Date:
 November 6, 2008
By:
/s/ BRUCE
 A. WILLIAMSONBruce A. WilliamsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In the Matter of : No. 1632 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
ROBERT M. DANENBERG : No. 130 DB 2010
: Attorney Registration No. 43657

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : (Allegheny County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2" day of December, 2016, the Petition for Reinstatement is
granted. Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the

investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1996-B

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of September 1, 1996 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement")
by and between Chase USA and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as
trustee (the "Trustee"), does hereby certify that:

         1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
              January 1, 2000 until December 31, 2000 was conducted under my
              supervision.

         2.   Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
              knowledge, fully performed in all material respects all its
              obligations, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout
              such period and no material default in the performance of such
              obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
              paragraph 3 below.

         3.   None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 26th day of March 2001.



                                                     /s/ Keith Schuck
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Keith Schuck
                                                     Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and section 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 22, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Eric Ross Allen,*                     Los Angeles, California; to acquire voting shares of Rum River Bancorporation, Inc., Milaca, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The First National Bank of Milaca, Milaca, Minnesota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 2, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-07902 Filed 4-6-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3645 

To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to reauthorize 

a provision relating to additional contract authority for States with 

Indian reservations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK of Arizona (for herself, Mr. MATHESON, and Mr. LUJA ́N) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to reauthorize a provision relating to additional 

contract authority for States with Indian reservations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian School Bus 

5 Route Safety Reauthorization Act of 2009’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3645 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL CONTRACT AU2 THORITY FOR STATES WITH INDIAN RES3 ERVATIONS. 

4 Section 1214(d)(5)(A) of the Transportation Equity 

5 Act for the 21st Century (23 U.S.C. 202 note; 112 Stat. 

6 206; 119 Stat. 1460) is amended by striking ‘‘$1,800,000 

7 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2015’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
# Flying the skies with the South Carolina National Guard

/ Published Dec. 21, 2016

WEST COLUMBIA, S.C. – Located near the Columbia Metropolitan Airport is a small South Carolina Army National Guard aviation unit that has the ability to carry out real-world missions on a daily basis, transporting passengers and cargo to anywhere in the continental United States.

    Soldiers with Bravo Company, 2nd Battalion, 641st Aviation Regiment, fly the C-26 twin turboprop aircraft, which is an aviation asset specific to the National Guard.

  "It's a National Guard unit that does real-world missions almost every day," said Chief Warrant Officer 2 Graham Gilstrap, operations officer."We're not really well known, but we do really cool things."

   The unit is made up of four fulltime staff and two additional drill-status Soldiers, and typically conducts flying missions 3-4 days a week, along with a day for aircraft maintenance, Gilstrap said. A priority system determines what unit gets assigned each mission and what missions get fulfilled. Priority one would be emergencies, priority two is when the mission is essential and cannot be completed by another mode of travel, and priority three is official business travel and is the majority of the flights conducted. The missions can range from transporting service members to training events, conferences, and site visits, to moving mission essential cargo from one state to another, or even providing casualty evacuation in an emergency situation.

  "As a pilot, it gives you this unique perspective because of the types of missions," added Gilstrap.

   The aircraft can hold up to 14 passengers or be reconfigured to have additional space for cargo, based on the assignment. Gilstrap said there is a simple process to request the aircraft that includes a military member or DoD civilian filling out a Military Air Passenger/Cargo request form and submitting it to the service airlift validation office where it will be entered into a system and assigned based on assets available. Once the mission has been assigned to the unit, the crew can coordinate directly with the passengers.

 "There is no reason our Guard members can't use this asset," said Gilstrap."It's a very capable aircraft."

  In addition to this stateside mission, the unit is also a deployable asset. Both personnel and aircraft can be deployed overseas to provide transportation assistance throughout the operational area.

  "We do the exact same mission while deployed - transporting passengers and cargo," said Chief Warrant Officer 4 Clinton Zimmer, C-26 pilot.

   It is an efficient aircraft that burns less fuel per hour and can carry more people while doing it, said Zimmer. For this reason, it's a cheaper aviation asset to have over other aircraft.

    The crew also enjoys flying the aircraft and completing the assignments, whether stateside or in a deployed location, added Zimmer. The profession can take them to a new location each day based on the needs of the military.

  "We fly all over the country," said Zimmer."We love the mission, it's a great mission."
Report of Independent Public Accountants

 

To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated financial statements of Household Finance Corporation (the "Company") and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and have issuedour report thereon dated January 15, 2001.  We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2000, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report on thosestatements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Company was not in compliance with any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated November 1, 1995, in conjunction with the Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series 1995-2 insofar as they relate to accounting matters.  It should be noted, however, that our audit was not directed primarily toward obtainingknowledge of such noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of the Companys system of internal accounting controls over the Companys home equity loan portfolio, including those loans serviced under the Agreement to the extent we considered necessary toevaluate the system as required by generally accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with these standards, the purpose of our study and evaluation, which included obtaining an understanding of the accounting systems, was to determine the nature,timing and extent of the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on the financial statements.  Our study and evaluation also took into consideration certain of the criteria and audit requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits ofNon-Supervised Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.  However, certain procedures included in the audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans being serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records relating to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that, in our opinion, Section 3.10 of the Agreement required us to report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors and management of the Company and should not be used for any other purpose.

Arthur Andersen LLP

Chicago, Illinois

January 15, 2001
s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 6, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00273

- CV

Buddy STEEL and Jaret Casteel,

Appellant s

v.

Amelia STAYTON

, Appellee

From the County Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- 0138CC

Honor able Garry A. Merritt, J udge Presiding



### ORDER

In this appeal, t he reporter’s record was due on June 29 , 201 5

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1.

On July 2, 2015, court reporter Lisa C. Greenwalt filed a notification of late reporter’s record . It

state s the reporter is waiting on payment for the record

.

We ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the

date of this order that (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay

the reporter’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If

Appellant fails to respond within the time provided, Appellant must file a brief with this court

within THIRTY DA YS after the clerk’s record is filed , and the court will only “consider and

decide those issue s or points [raised in Appellant’s brief] that do not require a reporter’s record

for a decision.” See id. R. 37.3(c).

If Appellant timely complies with this order, the reporter’s record will be due not later

than THIRTY DAYS from the date Appellant files written proof showing compliance with this

order. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension of time to file the record in a regular appeal to

thirty days).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and aff ixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001001907
<NAME> SPACEHAB, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      92,327,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,978,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            98,856,212
<PP&E>                                     155,925,259
<DEPRECIATION>                              43,338,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             220,604,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,195,616
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    81,238,925
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               220,604,091
<SALES>                                     64,087,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            64,087,401
<CGS>                                       35,058,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,058,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,331,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,479,787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,131,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,526,923
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,604,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,604,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
        

</TABLE>
In The Matter Of: 

RIAN C. SEEMAN 

Respondent 

SERVED MAY 25, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0198 

Case No. 2010-S0-370103 

ORDER GRANTING FAA'S MOTION FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF CR 16 CONFERENCEAND GRANTING/DENYING 

OTHER RELIEF 

On April9, 2012 ari Order Setting a Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, 

and Directing Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission was filed. Among other things, this 

Order set the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference for Tuesday, June 5, 2012. 

On April 18,2012 the Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

filed a Motion for Continuance of the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference. 

As oftoday's date, May 25, 2012, the prose Respondent, Rian Seeman, has 

failed to object or respond to the FAA's Motion for Continuance. 

It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1) The FAA's Motion for Continuance is granted. The Second CR 16 

Conference previously set on June 5, 2012 is continued to June 18,2012 at ll:OOam 

EST. -

2) The deadline for written submission of the parties' joint Rule 26(f) . 

Proposed Scheduling/Discovery Plan is continued from May 29, 2012 to June 11,2012. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U~S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Rian C. Seeman, Respondent 

12433 Pineneedle Drive 

Indianapolis, IN 46236-3160 

TEL: 317-657-8965 

ONE COPY 

Rashawn Rich George, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404.;305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 -. .-.. 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0198 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-