CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Feather River Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 3.20 Date adopted/ Amended/Rescinded: Amended August 1, 2011

Rule Title(s): Wood Produc ts Coating Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: April 18, 2013

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Adopted December 5, 2005;

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Timothy Mitro Phone Number: ( 530) 634-7659 ext 208 E-mail Address: tmitro@fraqmd.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Adopted Rule 3.20 Wood Products Coating Operations fo cuses on limiting the ROG/VOC content of various

coating categories and strippers and requiring the use of high efficiency coating applications.

The rule was amended on August 1, 2011 to lower the VO C limits of solvents used in surface preparation and

clean-up solvents. The VOC reductions from these 2011 rule amendments are addressed in Rule 3.14.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: none

Inventory Year Used to Calculate C hanges in Emissions: 2001 Area Affected: Yuba and Sutter Counties

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

The 2001 ARB CEIDARS database estimated VOC emissions fo r the Northern Sacramento Valley Air Basin were 0.289

tons per day (105.44 tons per year) from the wood products industry. FRAQMD wa s estimated to be responsible for 0.133

tons per day (48.41 tons per year). T he adoption of Rule 3.20 lead to an estimat ed 58% reduction for the District, which

would be 0.077 tons per day (28.1 tons per y ear) in the northern portion of the DIstrict.CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 43

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) D of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achi eving Emission Reductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): D Wo rk Practice Standards in Section(s): D

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): F Reporting Requirements in Section(s): FCALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: The rule has no effect on the recent plan updates.