18814 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 67 / Wednesday, April 8, 2015 / Notices 

6See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011– 

2012, 79 FR 44008 (July 29, 2014). 

1See Antidumping Duty Order: Glycine from the 

People’s Republic of China, 60 FR 16116 (March 29, 

1995) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 24398 (April 

30, 2014). 

3See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China; 2013–2014’’ from Gary Taverman, Associate 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), for a 

complete description of the scope of the order. 

4See Order. 

5See Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Acting Director, Office VI, Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, through Angelica 

Townshend, Program Manager, Office VI, 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

from Ericka Ukrow, International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, Office VI, titled ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Glycine from the People’s 

Republic of China; 2013–2014: Bona Fide Nature of 

Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.’s 

Sales,’’ dated concurrently and hereby adopted by 

this notice (Evonik’s Bona Fide Memorandum). 

last day of the most recently completed 

administrative review under the order.6

Instructions to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection 

As we stated in our Initiation and 

Preliminary Results, we will instruct 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 

end the suspension of liquidation for 

the merchandise covered by the 

revocation on the effective date of this 

notice of revocation, in part, and to 

release any cash deposit or bond, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(g)(4). 

Notification 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.216(e), 351.221(b)(5), and 

351.222(g). 

Dated: April 2, 2015. 

Paul Piquado 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08112 Filed 4–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–836] 

Glycine From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Preliminary Intent To 

Rescind, in Part; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

the People’s Republic of China (the 

PRC) covering the period of review 

(POR) from March 1, 2013, through 

February 28, 2014. The administrative 

review covers two mandatory 

respondents, Baoding Mantong Fine 

Chemistry Co. Ltd. (Baoding Mantong) 

and Evonik Rexim (Nanning) 

Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Evonik). The 

Department preliminarily finds that 

Baoding Mantong sold subject 

merchandise in the United States at 

prices below the normal value (NV) 

during the POR. The Department 

preliminarily determines that Evonik’s 

sales to the United States were not bona 

fide and is preliminarily rescinding the 

review with respect to Evonik. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dena Crossland or Ericka Ukrow, AD/

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3362 or (202) 482– 

0405, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 30, 2014, the Department 

initiated an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty Order 1 on glycine 

from the PRC.2

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the 

antidumping duty order is glycine, 

which is a free-flowing crystalline 

material, like salt or sugar.3 The subject 

merchandise is currently classifiable 

under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheading 2922.49.4020. The HTSUS 

subheading is provided for convenience 

and customs purposes only; the written 

product description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive.4

Methodology 

The Department is conducting this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

The list of topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

provided as an Appendix to the notice. 

This memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and in the Central 

Records Unit, room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Internet at 

http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The 

signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Bona Fides Analysis 

As discussed in Evonik’s Bona Fide 

Memorandum, the Department 

preliminarily finds that the sales by 

Evonik are not bona fide, and that these 

sales, and absence of factors-ofproduction (FOP) data, do not provide 

a reasonable or reliable basis for 

calculating a dumping margin.5 The 

Department reached this conclusion 

based on the totality of circumstances, 

namely: (a) The atypical nature of 

Evonik’s price; and (b) the atypical 

circumstances surrounding its 

supplier’s inability to provide FOP data. 

Because these non-bona fide sales were 

the only sales of subject merchandise 

that Evonik made during the POR, the 

Department is preliminarily rescinding 

its review of Evonik. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

The Department has preliminarily 

determined that the following dumping 

margin exists for the period March 1, 

2013, through February 28, 2014: 

Exporter 

Dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co. Ltd ............................. 784.48 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 67 / Wednesday, April 8, 2015 / Notices 18815 

6See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)–(2). 

8See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

9See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

10See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

11See 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). 

12See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification). 13See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 14 Id. 15See Final Modification at 8103. 16See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion 

of this practice. 

17See Glycine From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2011–2012, 78 FR 20891 

(April 8, 2013). 

18The Department’s change in policy regarding 

conditional review of the PRC-wide entity applies 

to this administrative review. See Antidumping 

Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 

Department Practice for Respondent Selection in 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional 

Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 

(November 4, 2013). Under this policy, the PRCwide entity will not be under review unless a party 

specifically requests, or the Department selfinitiates, a review of the entity. Because no party 

requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this 

review, the entity is not under review and the 

entity’s rate is not subject to change. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

The Department intends to disclose 

calculations performed for these 

preliminary results to the parties within 

five days of the date of publication of 

this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). Interested parties may 

submit case briefs no later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of these 

preliminary results of review.6 Rebuttal 

briefs, which must be limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, must be filed 

within five days after the time limit for 

filing case briefs.7 A table of contents, 

list of authorities used, and an executive 

summary of issues should accompany 

any briefs submitted to the Department. 

This summary should be limited to five 

pages total, including footnotes. 

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of the 

publication of this notice.8 Hearing 

requests should contain the following 

information: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

the issues to be discussed. Oral 

argument presentations will be limited 

to issues raised in the briefs. If a request 

for a hearing is made, parties will be 

notified of the date and time for the 

hearing to be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230.9

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, which will include the results of 

our analysis of all issues raised in the 

briefs, within 120 days after the 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results of 

this review, the Department will 

determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review.10 The 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this review. If we proceed to a final 

rescission of this administrative review, 

with respect to Evonik, then its entries 

will be assessed at the rate entered.11

For each individually examined 

respondent in this review whose 

weighted-average dumping margin in 

the final results of review is above de 

minimis (i.e., greater than or equal to 0.5 

percent), the Department intends to 

calculate importer- (or customer)- 

specific assessment rates, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).12 Where the 

respondent reported reliable entered 

values, the Department intends to 

calculate importer- (or customer-) 

specific ad valorem rates by aggregating 

the dumping margins calculated for all 

U.S. sales to the importer (or customer) 

and dividing this amount by the total 

entered value of the sales to the 

importer (or customer).13 Where the 

Department calculates an importer- (or 

customer-) specific weighted-average 

dumping margin by dividing the total 

amount of dumping for reviewed sales 

to the importer (or customer) by the 

total sales quantity associated with 

those transactions, the Department will 

direct CBP to assess importer- (or 

customer-)specific assessment rates 

based on the resulting per-unit rates.14

Where an importer- (or customer-) 

specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is 

greater than de minimis, the Department 

will instruct CBP to collect the 

appropriate duties at the time of 

liquidation. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, or an 

importer- (or customer-) specific ad 

valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de 

minimis, the Department will instruct 

CBP to liquidate appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.15

On October 24, 2011, the Department 

announced a refinement to its 

assessment practice in non-market 

economy antidumping duty cases.16

Pursuant to this refinement in practice, 

for entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales database submitted by an 

exporter individually examined during 

this review, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, 

pursuant to this refinement, if the 

Department determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

PRC-wide rate. 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results 

of this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated duties, where 

applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, will apply 

to all shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

the companies listed above that have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that rate established in the final 

results of this administrative review 

(except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, 

then a zero cash deposit will be 

required); (2) for any previously 

reviewed or investigated PRC and nonPRC exporter not listed above that 

received a separate rate in a previous 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate published 

for the most recently completed period; 

(3) for all PRC exporters that have not 

been found to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be that 

for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 453.79 

percent); 17 18 and (4) for all non-PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporter that 

supplied the non-PRC exporter. These 

cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18816 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 67 / Wednesday, April 8, 2015 / Notices 

1See Certain Steel from the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 

58744 (September 30, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary 

Results’’), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Preliminary Results. 

3The Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening 

Systems Co., Ltd. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 

(collectively ‘‘Stanley’’); see the memoranda to the 

file ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of 

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (‘‘SBD’’) in the 2012– 

2013 Antidumping Duty Review of Certain Steel 

Nails from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’),’’ and Verification of the Questionnaire 

Responses of The Stanley Works (Langfang) 

Fastening Systems Co., Ltd. (‘‘Stanley Langfang’’) in 

the 2012–2013 Antidumping Duty Review of 

Certain Steel Nails from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’), both dated February 9, 2015. 

4See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, through James C. 

Doyle, Director, Office V, Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations from Matthew 

Renkey, Senior International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Operations regarding Certain Steel Nails from 

the People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, dated January 20, 2015. 

5The Department recently added the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule category 7907.00.6000, ‘‘Other 

articles of zinc: Other,’’ to the language of the 

Order. See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Senior 

Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, through James C. Doyle, Director, Office 

9, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, regarding ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the 

People’s Republic of China: Cobra Anchors Co. Ltd. 

Final Scope Ruling,’’ dated September 19, 2013. 

6See ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the People’s 

Republic of China: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Fifth 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

concurrently with and hereby adopted by this 

notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’), for a 

complete description of the Scope of the Order. 

7On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of its centralized 

electronic service system to ACCESS. The Web site 

location was changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov 

to http://access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing 

the references to the centralized electronic service 

system to ACCESS in the Department’s regulations 

can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014). 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: March 31, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Methodology 

5. Bona Fides Inquiry 

6. Non-Market Economy Country Status 

7. Separate Rates Determination 

A. Absence of De Jure Control 

B. Absence of De Facto Control 

8. The PRC-Wide Entity 

9. Surrogate Country 

A. Economic Comparability 

B. Significant Producer of Comparable 

Merchandise 

C. Data Availability 

10. Date of Sale 

11. Fair Value Comparisons 

A. Export Price 

B. Value-Added Tax 

C. Normal Value 

12. Factor Valuation Methodology 

A. ME Prices 

B. Surrogate Values 

13. Comparisons to Normal Value 

A. Determination of Comparison Method 

B. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

14. Currency Conversion 

15. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–07952 Filed 4–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–909] 

Certain Steel Nails from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published the 

Preliminary Results of the fifth 

administrative review of certain steel 

nails (‘‘nails’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on 

September 30, 2014.1 We gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

Based upon our analysis of the 

comments and information received, we 

made changes to the margin calculations 

for these final results. The final 

dumping margins are listed below in the 

‘‘Final Results of the Administrative 

Review’’ section of this notice. The 

period of review (‘‘POR’’) is August 1, 

2012, through July 31, 2013. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew Renkey or Susan Pulongbarit, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone 202– 

482–2312 or 202–482–4031, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department published the 

Preliminary Results on September 30, 

2014.2 On February 9, 2015, we released 

the sales and factors of production 

(‘‘FOP’’) verification reports for 

Stanley.3 Between February 12 and 

February 24, 2015, interested parties 

submitted case and rebuttal briefs. On 

January 20, 2015, the Department 

extended the deadline for the final 

results to March 30, 2015.4

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

includes certain steel nails having a 

shaft length up to 12 inches. Certain 

steel nails subject to the order are 

currently classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 

7317.00.55, 7317.00.65, 7317.00.75, and 

7907.00.6000.5 While the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties in this review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the issues which 

parties raised is attached to this notice 

as an appendix. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file in the Central Records Unit 

(‘‘CRU’’), Room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building, as 

well as electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).7

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in the 

CRU. In addition, a complete version of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

can be accessed directly on the Internet 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/

index.html. The signed Issues and 

Decision Memorandum and the 

electronic version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, and for the reasons explained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

we revised the margin calculation for 

Stanley. Accordingly, for the final 

results, the Department has updated the 

margin to be assigned to companies 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES