alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AIR-09-250-E

August 25, 2010

Exem ption No. 10123 Regul atory Docket No. FAA-2009-0445

Mr. Jim Vanek Sport Copter, Inc. 34012 Skyway Drive Scappoose, OR 97056

Dear Mr. Vanek:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied yo ur petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 5, 2009, you petitioned the Fed eral Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Sport Copter, Inc. for an exemption from §§ 21.191(i)(3) and 21.193(e)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). Th e proposed exemption, if granted, would allow Sport Copter, Inc. to produce and sell gyropl anes for certification under § 21.191(i) without previously having manufactured and assemble d a gyroplane of the same make and model that has been issued a special airworthiness certificated in the light-sport category under § 21.190.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for n ot publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register

because the requested exemption would not set a pr ecedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detriment al to Sport Copter, Inc.

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in ci rcumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In D enial of Exemption No. 10099 (copy enclosed), the FAA did not believe it is in the pub lic interest to permit a manufacturer to sell a make and model of gyroplane (or aircraft kit), elig ible for the issuance of an experimental certificate in the light-sport category, if that ma nufacturer has not yet produced a gyroplane of that make and model that meets the accepted consens us standards.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exem ption, I find that—

• they don’t differ materially from those presented b y the petitioner in the enclosed denial of exemption;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclo sed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption would not be in the public int erest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 an d 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition Sp ort Copter, Inc. for an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 21.191(i)(3) and 21.193(e)(1).

Sincerely,

/s/

K.C. Yanamura Acting Director, Aircraft Certification Service

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 99.1
                              C.E.O. CERTIFICATION




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vapor Fuel Technologies, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, C. Thomas Davis, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ C. Thomas Davis
C. Thomas Davis
Chief Executive Officer
February 10, 2003
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report of Cash Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Bruce Korman,
our Chief Executive Officer, and Edmund King, our Chief Financial Officer, respectfully, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Cash Technologies, Inc



Dated: September 14, 2004



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|/s/    BRUCE KORMAN     |  |  |  | /s/    EDMUND KING     
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Gachot v. Lotke

*D. Connors Kagno,*for plaintiff.

*Irwin Rosenzweig, Richard Goerwitz, David Blake, John Naulty, Barton Post,*and *Wm. Sullivan,*for defendants.

November 28, 1977

GREENBERG, J.,

This case is again before us on plaintiffs’ objections to a third set of interrogatories.

On November 10, 1977, we denied defendant, Paul A. Lotke’s motion for a more complete answer *254to an interrogatory which asked plaintiffs to state in full the facts forming the basis for plaintiffs’ allegation that this defendant was guilty of wilful, wanton and reckless misconduct. We did this because we felt that plaintiffs’ answer sufficiently answered that question.

Plaintiffs’ answer, however, did refer to defendant’s failure to follow elementary medical principles; to defendant’s ignoring certain classic signs and symptoms; to defendant’s prescribing certain antibiotics; to defendant’s failure to properly observe the patient; to defendant’s failure to advise plaintiff of certain risks; to defendant’s failure to provide necessary consultations and to defendant’s failure to recommend appropriate tests. Now defendant seeks to ascertain the principles, the signs and symptoms, the antibiotics, etc., etc., to which plaintiff refers in his answer.

It seems to us that this is proper and is in no way an indication of bad faith or harassment. Certainly plaintiff would have to show this at the trial so that it is not something he would otherwise not be required to do. In addition, it is this type of information which provides the basis for a proper settlement of the case and while there is no assurance that the case will settle if it is provided, it is certain that it will not settle if it is not provided.

For these reasons we believe that the third set of interrogatories is proper and should be answered.

ORDER

And now, November 28, 1977, plaintiffs’ objections to defendant Paul A. Lotke’s third set of interrogatories (26 to 32 inclusive) are overruled and plaintiffs shall file answers to same within 30 days of the date of this order.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 30 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 30

 To set forth a method of determining maximum out-of-pocket limits and 
  annual updates to premium tax credit eligibility under the Patient 
                  Protection and Affordable Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2021

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Blumenthal, and Ms. Baldwin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To set forth a method of determining maximum out-of-pocket limits and 
  annual updates to premium tax credit eligibility under the Patient 
                  Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Indexing for Health Care 
Affordability Act''.

SEC. 2. PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT PERCENTAGE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1302(c)(4) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(c)(4)) is amended by striking 
``calendar year)'' and inserting ``calendar year, based on estimates 
and projections of changes for the applicable year in the average per 
enrollee employer-sponsored insurance premiums provided by the National 
Health Expenditure Accounts)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 1, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salary.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), G. Kent Plunkett, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Kenneth S. Goldman, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our best knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be
filed for any purpose whatsoever.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                             
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  |                                                             
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/ G. Kent Plunkett                                        
|                      |  |  |  | G. Kent Plunkett                                            
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer             
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  |                                                             
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth S. Goldman                                      
|                      |  |  |  | Kenneth S. Goldman                                          
|                      |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vapor Fuel Technologies, Inc. on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending  December 31, 2002, as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Larry  Chace,
Treasurer and principal financial officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Larry Chace
Larry Chace
Chief Financial Officer
January 13, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OLXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the annual report on Form 10-K of SPACEHAB, Incorporated(the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, BrianK. Harrington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  the report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Brian K. Harrington                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian  K. Harrington, Chief Financial Officer |
| September 29,  2008                      |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as is notto be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

 

----
EX- 4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 
 The fourth amendment to the Interconnection Agreement between PT Telekomunikasi Seluler (“Telkomsel”) and PT Indosat Tbk (“Indosat”) as stipulated in the Cooperation Agreement of
Interconnection between Indosat and Telkomsel on Interconnection between Telkomsel’s Cellular Mobile Network and Indosat’s Cellular Telecommunication Network, No.Telkomsel:Amd.682/LG.05/PD-00/V/2012 – No. Indosat: 05/C00-C0HA/LGL/2012
dated May 28, 2012. 
 The Parties: 
  

	1.	PT Telkomsel; and 

  

	2.	PT Indosat Tbk 

 Scope of The
Amendment: 
 This fourth amendment was made to implement the Indonesian Telecommunication Regulatory Authority (“BRTI”)
letter No.262/BRTI/XII/2011 dated December 12, 2011 (“BRTI Letter”) regarding the change of SMS fee from a sender-keeps-all scheme to a cost-based scheme which was implemented on June 1, 2012. There were amendments to this sixth
amendment as follows: 
  

	1.	Billing; 

  

	2.	SMS Interconnection Tariff; 

  

	3.	Technical Data; 

  

	4.	Call Scenario & Routing; 

  

	5.	Finance Settlement; 

  

	6.	Clearing Data Exchange Format; and 

  

	7.	Volume Compare Format. 

 Period of
Amendment: 
 This fourth amendment became effective on June 1, 2012 and has the same expiration date as the Cooperation
Agreement. 
 SMS Interconnection Tariff: 
  

					
	 No
	  	 Type of Service
	  	 Tariff (IDR/SMS)

	 1.
	  	SMS	  	23
		  		  	
		  		  	
		  		  	








 The latest addendum to the Interconnection Agreement between Telkomsel and Indosat as stipulated in the
Cooperation Agreement of Interconnection between Indosat and Telkomsel on Interconnection between Telkomsel’s Cellular Mobile Network and Indosat’s Cellular Telecommunication Network, as set forth in the mutual office minutes, No.
Telkomsel : 004/IC.01/MO-01/III/2013 – No. Indosat : 003/C00-C0H/LGL/2013 dated March 8, 2013. 
 The Parties:

  

	1.	PT Telkomsel; and 

  

	2.	PT Indosat Tbk 

 Scope of the Mutual
Office Minutes: 
 The use of managed services SMS hubber by Telkomsel where Telkomsel will connect the GSMSC/STP Telkomsel through
managed services SMS hubber to GSMSC/STP Indosat. 
 Period of Mutual Office Minutes: 

These mutual office minutes are effective from March 8, 2013 until March 7, 2014.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Innovation,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Chad D.
  Lee, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.



|Date:                                                                      | May 13, 2005 | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------ | 
|                                                                           |              | 
|                                                                           |              | 
|                                                                           |              | 
|/s/
      Chad D. Lee                                                      |             
|Chad D. Lee, President,
      Director, 
      Principal Executive Officer |             

---
Order entered April 25, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01009 - CV AJANI REESE, Appellant

V. HIGHLAND PARK APARTM ENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County C ourt at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 03315 - E



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s motion for a sixty

- day extension of time to file his amended brief

. We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER the brief be filed no later t han May 28, 2019.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-11-00896- CV
Valerie Thomas Bahar, M.D.; Valerie Thomas Bahar, M.D., P .A.; Shal anda D. Moore, J.D.; and Jos eph R. Willi e, II, D.D.S., J.D., Appellants
v. Lyon Financial S ervic es, Inc., A Minnesota Cor poration d/ b/a US B ancorp Manif est F und ing S ervic es; and Riecke Baum ann, Receiverand Master in Chancery, Appellees

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 1 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -CV- 11- 0122 39, H ONO RAB LE J. DAVID P HI LLIP S, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to abate this a ppeal pending settlement neg otiations. The motion is grante d and the appe al is abate d until Februa ry 18, 2013. The pa

rties shall submit either a mot ion to reinstate or a joint status report conc erning the status of settlement neg otiations no later than Fe bruar y 18, 2013. Upon reinstateme nt, the appellants’ brief will be due not later than the thirtieth (30th) day followingreinstateme nt.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Abated Filed: De cembe r 19, 2012
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. on
Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2017 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Takeshi Kunibe, President and Group Chief Executive Officer of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc., certify that, to the best of my
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Date: June 29, 2017



|                   |  |                                            
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------
|/s/ Takeshi Kunibe
|Name:              |  | Takeshi Kunibe                             
|Title:             |  | President and Group Chief Executive Officer
The State of New Hampshire 

Department of Environmental Services 

Rob Maxfield 

Director, OEME 

US EPA Region 1 

11 Technology Drive 

North Chelmsford, MA 01863 

Dear Mr. Maxfield: 

Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner 

September 2, 20 14 

The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES) is pleased to submit the 2014/2015 Ambient 

Air Monitoring Program Annual Network Review Plan in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations Title 

40, PART 58.1 0. DES made this plan available for public· comment and EPA review, via website, for 30 days 

starting in June 2014. After receiving no public comment and a few EPA suggestions, DES made changes 

where appropriate and has posted the latest plan to the following FTP site for your approval: 

ftp://nhftp.admin.state.nh.us 

DES would like to thank the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for their continued support 

toward improving and maintaining New Hampshire's Air Monitoring Network. 

Sincerely, 

Director, Air Res

~ ources Division 

Cc: Bob Judge (EPA) 

Alan VanArsdale (EPA) 

www.des.nh.gov 

29 Hazen Drive • PO Box 95 • Concord, NH 03302-0095 

(603) 271-3503 • TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964