alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14
PROMULGATED UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted.](c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/
J. Roger Moody, Jr.J. Roger Moody, Jr.Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
C OURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RIVER MASCARI

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 2 8 1

- C R

Appeal from the

210 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 201 2 0D0 612 5 )

O R D E R

The trial court judge has verbally informed the Clerk’s Office that Appellant does not

have a right to appeal. The trial court has not, however, entered a written certification of the

Appellant’s right to appeal as required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure

. See T EX .R.A PP .P.

25.2(d), Appendix D. Accordingly, the trial court is ordered to enter the required certification

and file it with the trial court clerk within thirty days of the date of this order. See Cortez v.

State , 420 S.W.3d 803 806

- 07 (Tex.Crim .App. 2013). If the trial court is unable to obtain the

defendant’s signature on the certification, the trial court should nevertheless certify whether

Appellant has a right to appeal and file the certification without the Appellant’s signature. The

tria l court clerk shall provide a copy of the certification to this Court as soon as possible, but not

later than three days after it is filed. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 25. 2(e).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7 th day of December , 20 1 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes , JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheets  and  consolidated  statements  of  income  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,620,062
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      373,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,541,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                           9,623,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,132,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,163,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,132,161
<SALES>                                            237,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,962,598
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,794,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   310,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   225,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 151,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,168,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,168,555
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,168,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         3.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         3.51
        


</TABLE>
# CNGB Holiday Message 

/ Published Dec. 19, 2008

With the holidays now upon us, I extend warmest Seasons Greetings to the Soldiers and Airmen of the National Guard and to their families and employers.

America is indebted to you for your dedication and service to the Nation, and I thank you for you for the sacrifices you make every day. As the operational tempo of the National Guard increases both at home and overseas, so does the stress on individuals and families. I hope that, during this holiday season, you will be able to spend time with friends and loved ones and put aside the cares of daily life, if only for a short while.

Let us remember those who cannot be with us and those who have paid the ultimate sacrifice. We pray for those in harm's way and for their safe return, and we honor those who have gone before us.

Please celebrate the New Year safely and have a healthy and prosperous 2009.
From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: parise.tanya@ecrweb.com 

Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 05:08PM 

Subject: information on catalyst installation 

Tanya, 

I talked to Jim McDonald with Miratech this afternoon regarding installing catalysts on engines 

located in cold weather areas and on offshore platforms. He indicated that engines on offshore 

platforms are typically equipped with a silencer (possibly due to OSHA requirements). He said 

that the catalyst can be put in the silencer, so it would not take up any additional space on the 

platform. Regarding engines located in cold weather areas, he indicated that there were no issues 

with installing an oxidation catalyst in a cold weather location. If the engine is enclosed to protect 

it from the cold, the catalyst can be installed on the roof of the enclosure. He did not indicate that 

the cost would be significantly higher to install a catalyst in a cold weather location. 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov 

Page 1 of 1

https://rtairmail1.rtp.epa.gov/mail/mking.nsf/($Sent)/0A71D9BEFC9363DB852576CD007... 2/17/2010
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00266-CR

ALEC NAVA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-2080-C2

A B A T E M E N T ORDER

On January 3, 2019, Alex Nava’s retained counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders 

v. California and a motion to withdraw stating that after “a professional evaluation of the 

record in this case and a thorough review of applicable law, [counsel] has reached the 

conclusion that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced to support an appeal and 

the appeal is frivolous under the standards applied in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 

87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1967).” On June 5, 2019, this Court entered an Order 
Nava v. State Page 2

allowing Nava’s retained counsel to withdraw. The Order required Nava within 30 days 

from the date of the Order to 1) retain new counsel, 2) take other action showing his desire 

to pursue his appeal, including but not limited to requesting the appointment of another 

attorney if he cannot afford one, or 3) notify this Court that he no longer desires to pursue 

his appeal.

On June 12, 2019, Nava notified this Court that he wants to continue his appeal 

and that he would like appointed counsel. We abate this appeal to the trial court to hold 

a hearing within 30 days of the date of this Order to determine whether Nava is entitled 

to receive a court-appointed attorney, and if so, to appoint new counsel on appeal. The 

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records, if any, are ordered to be filed within 45 days 

of the date of this Order.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed July 9, 2019

Do not publish 

[RWR]
For Immediate Release





Contacts:Megan DerkeyXRS Corporationmegan.derkey@xrscorp.com952.707.5681David HlavacBellmont Partnersdavid@bellmontpartners.com612.803.3350





XRS NAMES REIDY CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER


Expanded role for current President and COO reflects company’s growth and market opportunity





MINNEAPOLIS (Oct. 2, 2013) - XRS Corporation (NASDAQ: XRSC), the leader in mobile trucking intelligence, announced today that current President and Chief Operating Officer Brendan Reidy has also been named Chief Technology Officer.





“As XRS enters its new fiscal year, the company is stronger in all phases of business than it was one year ago,” said Jay Coughlan, chairman and CEO, XRS Corporation. “This is a testament to the strength of our product, customer relationships, and the deep talent pool within the organization. Expanding Brendan’s role to leverage his depth of understanding of our product, people, customers and marketplace is an important step toward helping the company attain its goals.”





As president and COO of XRS, Reidy oversees development, product management, information systems, quality assurance, customer support, supply chain and human resources. In his expanded role, Reidy will oversee the company’s long-term product strategy and will continue to report directly to Coughlan.





Before joining XRS in March 2013, Reidy held executive-level positions at Clarus, Qwest Communications/US West, Litton Integrated Automation and Software Alliance Corp. In addition, he served as a director of several technology companies including eGistics, Arantech, Evolving Systems and Greenbrier & Russel.





“I am inspired by the level of growth XRS has been able to achieve during the past fiscal year, but realize there is still a significant opportunity to leverage our market position more completely and effectively,” Reidy said. “I am looking forward to working with everyone at XRS to achieve our shared vision for success in the mobile trucking intelligence marketplace.”





About XRS Corporation


XRS Corporation, the leader in mobile trucking intelligence, delivers software solutions to the trucking industry to help maintain regulatory compliance and reduce operating costs. Data-driven intelligence for compliance and performance is the new competitive edge for trucking operations, and XRS is leading the trucking industry’s migration to mobile devices by offering products with no upfront hardware costs and run on smartphones, tablets and rugged handhelds. XRS has sales and distribution partnerships with the major wireless carriers supporting the U.S. and Canadian trucking industries. Through our mobile products, fleet managers, dispatchers and drivers collect, sort, view and analyze data to help lower costs,





---




increase safety, attain compliance with governmental regulations, and improve customer satisfaction - all through their mobile devices. For more information, visit www.xrscorp.com or call 1-800-745-9282.
#### Noll v. Noll.

*Divorce*— Cruel *and barbarous treatment*— Bill *of ‘particulars*— Dates *and places.*

In an action for divorce on the ground of cruel and barbarous treatment, the acts should be alleged with reasonable certainty as to time and place, but the exact date and place of the occurrence of each particular act need not be set forth.

Rule for more specific bill of particulars. C. P. Dauphin Co., March T., 1921, No. 68.

*Beidleman & Hull,*for rule; *James G. Hate,*contra.

Jan. 3, 1922.

Fox, J.,

On petition of the respondent, the court granted a rule upon libellant to show cause why a more specific bill of particulars should not be filed. An answer to the rule was filed, averring that the bill of particulars as filed was sufficient, and that the respondent is not entitled to have a more specific bill of particulars.

Upon examination of the bill of particulars as filed, we think it is sufficient.

The ground of divorce is cruel and barbarous treatment. The bill of particulars shows that the alleged cruel and barbarous treatment covered a long period of time. We think the respondent is quite fully supplied and informed of what she is called upon to meet at the trial of the case. Acts of cruel and barbarous treatment should be alleged with reasonable certainty as to time and place, but the exact date and place of the occurrence of each particular act need not be set forth, particularly where it is not covered by any particular time, but runs over a long period. It would be impracticable and impossible in many cases to give a specific allegation of the time and place of each particular occurrence, and should not be required: 14 Cyc., 668; 19 Corpus Juris, 111.

And now, Jan. 3, 1922, for the reasons stated, the petition is dismissed and the rule discharged.

*Cf.*Noll *v.*Noll, 30 Dist. R. 919.

Prom William Jenkins Wilcox, Harrisburg, Pa.
Exhibit 32 

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rudy 45, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Pearl Asencio, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the

Company. 

 

| March 15, 2006                                                      |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |
| /s/   Pearl Asencio                                  |
| Pearl Asencio

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer |

 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Microsoft Corporation and will be retained by Rudy 45 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Jeffrey Williams, Chief Financial Officer of eGene. Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company.

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report.

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report.

     4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

          a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

          b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

          c)   Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.

     5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company's auditors and the Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 14, 2004           By:    /s/ Jeffrey Williams
                                   Jeffrey Williams
                                   Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 13.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report onForm 20-F/ A of Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PTTelekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk. (the “Company”) for theyearly period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Kristiono, President Director of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company./s/ Kristiono Name: KristionoTitle:  President DirectorDate:  April 25, 2005
. California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD Executive Order S-11-001 WHEREAS, AttachmentA hereto sets forth the currently effective version ofthe California Regulation for Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products (title 17, California Code of Regulations, Subchapter 8.5, Article 2, sections 94508-94517 (Consumer Products Regulation)), as adopted by the California Air Resources Board; WHEREAS, Attachment B hereto identifies the regulatory action in which the Air Resources Board amended the Consumer Products Regulation setforth in AttachmentA; WHEREAS, the Consumer Products Regulation set forth in AttachmentA incorporates all ofthe amendments made bythe regulatory action identified in Attachment B; WHEREAS, the Air Resources Board is authorized to adopt, amend, and enforce the referenced regulation by California Health and Safety Code sections 39600, 39601, 39607, and 41712; WHEREAS, the referenced regulation has been duly adopted and amended by the Air Resources Board through regulatory actions taken in accordance with the California Administrative Procedure Act as setforth in Chapter 3.5 (commencing with section (11340)), Part 1, Division 3, title 2, ofthe Government Code, and in accordance with other applicable laws; WHEREAS, the regulatory action incorporated in and reflected by the referenced regulation was approved by the California Office ofAdministrative Law, and thereafter became effective under State law; ·- WHEREAS, the Air Resources Board is authorized by California Health and Safety Code sections 39601 and 39602 toadopt and amend its regulations as revisions to the State ofCalifornia Implementation Plan forAchieving andMaintaining the National AmbientAirQualityStandards (SIP); WHEREAS, the adoption ofthe regulation set forth in AttachmentA as a revision to the SIP is necessaryto meetthe requirements ofthe federal Clean AirAct; and WHEREAS, by the Resolution 09-51 and Executive Order R-10-013, theAir Resources Board adopted the regulatory action identified in Attachment B, and direCted the Executive Officerto submitthis material to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for inclusion in the SIP, and to include in the SIP revisions any additionaldocumentation identified as necessaryfor approvability underthe federal Clean AirAct and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regulations. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuantto sections 39515 and 39516 ofthe California Health and Safety Code, thatth!=l regulation setforth in Attachments A and B hereto is hereby adopted as a revision to the SIP and forwarded to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. I certify, pursuantto 40 Code of Federal Regulations, 51.102(f), thatthe regulation set forth in Attachments A and B**w~s** ad9pted.or amended after notice and public hearings as required by40 Code of Federal Regulations 51.102(d). Executed this 

# ;;P da,y of 

## .:/dnuff ,2011, at Sacramento, California.

Enclosures



### 2 Jame N. Goldstene Executive Officer 

## 'fc;r: