alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)  July 2, 2004

MAGNUM HUNTER
RESOURCES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Nevada                                                         | 1-12508                 | 87-0462881                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | ---------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (Commission File Number | (IRS Employer Identification No.)

600 East Las Colinas
Blvd., Suite 1100, Irving, Texas 75039(Address of principal
executive offices)        (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (972)
401-0752

(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)

---

# Item 5. Other Events and
Regulation FD Disclosure

Magnum
Hunter Resources, Inc. (the Company) announced today that it will issue an
additional 2,250,000 common shares pursuant to the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option granted in connection with the Companys principal offering of
15,000,000 shares of its common stock which closed on June 30, 2004.

The
foregoing is qualified by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K,
which is incorporated herein by reference.

# Item 7. Financial
Statements and Exhibits

|Exhibit Number | Exhibit Title                                  
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|99.1           | Press Release of the Company dated July 2, 2004
|               |                                                

---

SIGNATURE

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

|                     | MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.  By:  /s/Morgan F. Johnston          Morgan F. Johnston,          Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:   July 2, 2004 |                                                                                                                                                     

---

EXHIBIT INDEX

|Exhibit Number | Exhibit                                        
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|99.1           | Press Release of the Company dated July 2, 2004
|               |
#### THOMAS AGAN & OWEN *M'LAUGHLIN, pl'tffs in error, vs.*The BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS of the county of GRANT, *def'ts in error.*

“) *\ Error to Grant county.*| *J*

This case embraced the same questions of law, and depended upon the same State of facts as the above case, in every particular, except the names of the plaintiffs. It was submitted upon the argument in the foregoing case. The decision of *the court*below was affirmed according to the aboye opinion, without any separate opinion being delivered in it.
#### Kennedy vs. Baker and another.

Exemption. —Where a debtor removes his stock in trade, exempt from sale under subdivision 8, sec. 58, ch. 102, R. S., to an auction room, for the purpose of having it sold at auction, he forfeits the exemption given by the statute.

(4 Chand., 19.)

ERROR to tbe County Court of *Bock*County.

*Kennedy*brought an action of replevin' against *Baker & Haselton*for certain of bis goods and chattels, and they justified the seizure and detention for that they were seized and held under process of law to satisfy a debt due from *Kennedy*to Baker, and that *Haselton*was an officer having such process to execute and duly authorized to execute it.

*Kennedy*claimed that the goods seized were exempt from seizure and sale, as *his stock in*trade; that they were part of his stock in trade as a grocer. At the trial, it appeared that the plaintiff had removed the goods in question from his place of business to an auction room, to be sold for his benefit, whereupon they were seized by the defendants as before stated. The county court gave judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff brought error.

*J. B.*Bennett, for plaintiffs in error.

*Taylor & Niel,*for defendants in error.

*Per Ouriam.*

The removal of the goods in question to an auction store to be sold, is evidence that they were no longer to be used as ‘‘stock in trade,” and are not, therefore, protected by the exemption act.

We do not deem it necessary to decide whether goods used, as in this case, are stock in trade within the meaning of that act. The judgment must be affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Accountants

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-18485, 333-18487, 333-18493, 333-29467,
333-33185, 333-36469, 333-90777, 333-90779 and 333-90781) of Covance Inc. of our
report dated January 21, 2000 appearing on page 26 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey

March 2, 2000
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David Asai, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Learning Tree International, Inc. 

 

January 29, 2018

 

|   | By:    | /s/ David Asai     |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | David Asai              |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Learning Tree International, Inc. and will be retained by Learning Tree International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Uradni list C 27/2023

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 27 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6625. januar 2023 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 27

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6625. januar 2023

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2023/C 27/01 | Menjalni tečaji eura – 24. januar 2023 | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2023/C 27/01

Menjalni tečaji eura – 24. januar 2023

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 25.1.2023 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2023

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 27/1

---

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

24. januar 2023

(2023/C 27/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,0858 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 141,47 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4399 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,88368 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 11,0995 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,0053 |
| ISK | islandska krona | 156,10 |
| NOK | norveška krona | 10,7193 |
| BGN | bolgarski lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | češka krona | 23,874 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 397,33 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,7130 |
| RON | romunski lev | 4,9171 |
| TRY | turška lira | 20,4234 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,5470 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,4517 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 8,5014 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,6743 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,4337 |
| KRW | južnokorejski won | 1 341,60 |
| ZAR | južnoafriški rand | 18,7687 |
| CNY | kitajski juan | 7,3642 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 16 259,05 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 4,6448 |
| PHP | filipinski peso | 59,122 |
| RUB | ruski rubelj | |
| THB | tajski bat | 35,609 |
| BRL | brazilski real | 5,6164 |
| MXN | mehiški peso | 20,4603 |
| INR | indijska rupija | 88,6235 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,0858

JPY

japonski jen

141,47

DKK

danska krona

7,4399

GBP

funt šterling

0,88368

SEK

švedska krona

11,0995

CHF

švicarski frank

1,0053

ISK

islandska krona

156,10

NOK

norveška krona

10,7193

BGN

bolgarski lev

1,9558

CZK

češka krona

23,874

HUF

madžarski forint

397,33

PLN

poljski zlot

4,7130

RON

romunski lev

4,9171

TRY

turška lira

20,4234

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,5470

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,4517

HKD

hongkonški dolar

8,5014

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,6743

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,4337

KRW

južnokorejski won

1 341,60

ZAR

južnoafriški rand

18,7687

CNY

kitajski juan

7,3642

IDR

indonezijska rupija

16 259,05

MYR

malezijski ringit

4,6448

PHP

filipinski peso

59,122

RUB

ruski rubelj

THB

tajski bat

35,609

BRL

brazilski real

5,6164

MXN

mehiški peso

20,4603

INR

indijska rupija

88,6235

---

(1)  Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
Other Spring Wheat 2022

Production by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Bushels

Not Estimated

< 250,000

250,000 - 999,999

1,000,000 - 2,499,999

2,500,000 - 4,999,999

5,000,000 - 7,499,999

7,500,000 +
MARYLAND ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (MDARNG) DRINKING 

WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at La 

Plata Readiness Center, does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army 

National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water 

Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the 

American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to 

ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: May 2020

PFOA + PFOS Results: 2.2 ppt (J)i

Future Testing Event: May 2023

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Maryland National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 410-576-6179

Office E-mail Address: ng.md.mdarng.list.pao@mail.mil

Water quality report: A water quality report is not required for this location

i The reported result is an estimate. Values noted with a ‘J’ flag were detected by the laboratory but the true concentration is 

uncertain.
#### PRATT AND WOOD, Plaintiffs in Error, *vs.*WILLIAM BROWN, Defendant in Error.

ERROR TO COLUMBIA COUNTY COURT.

Where an appeal is dismissed in the County or Circuit Court for want of jurisdiction, no judgments for costs, made on the appeal, can be rendered; even though the failure of jurisdiction is occasioned by the fault or neglect of the appellant.

This suit was commenced by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error before a justice of the peace of Sauk county, when the plaintiff obtained judgment for $100. The defendants attempted to appeal, and made their affidavit stating that their *application*for appeal was made in good faith, and not for delay, &c. The venue was changed to Columbia county when the cause was tried, and a verdict returned for the plaintiff. A new trial was ordered at the next term, when the plaintiff below moved to dismiss the appeal for insufficiency in the affidavit, in stating that the application, instead of the appeal, was made in good faith. This motion was denied, and a trial had, which .again resulted in verdict for the plaintiff, on which judgment was rendered. The cause was taken to the Supreme Court, and this judgment reversed — the court holding that owing to the insufficiency of the affidavit, the County Court obtained no jurisdiction. The cause was remanded to the County Court, and at the November term, 1853, the court on motion of the plaintiff below, dismissed the appeal, and rendered judgment for costs of the appeal, against the defendant and his sureties in the recognizance for appeal.

*Collins, Smith & Keyes,*for the plaintiff in error.

Knowlton, for the defendant in error.

*By the Court,*

WhitON, C. J.

The Supreme Court having de-*189tided that the County Court did not obtain jurisdiction of tbis case, it follows that the court below committed no error in dismissing it. The only question is in regard to costs. We hold, upon a consideration of our statute, that where the statute did not give an^appeal, and the County Court dismissed the case for want of jurisdiction arising from that cause, no judgment for costs could be given. *Mitchell vs.*Kennedy, *1 Wis. R.*511.

But it is contended, that as the failure of the County Court to obtain jurisdiction of this case, arose from the neglect of the appellant, who is the plaintiff in error, a different rule should be adopted. We do not see as this circumstance can make any difference.

The objection is, that the court never became possessed of the case, and it is quite immaterial what the reason is which produced this result. If from any cause the court did not have the case before it, it could give no valid judgment. We must hold, therefore, as we did in the case of *Mitchell vs. Kennedy,*that so much of the judgment of the court as dismissed the case is affirmed, and so much as gave costs to the defendant must be reversed.
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Airspan Networks, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the period ending October 3, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Peter Aronstam, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Date: April 27, 2005  ****By:
    /s/
      PETER ARONSTAMPeter
      AronstamSenior
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
 
 **A
signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Airspan Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Airspan Networks, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, HassanM. Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

| Date: August 9, 2007 |                                                                                 |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ Hassan M. Ahmed                                                                  |
|                      | Hassan M. Ahmed  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
# North Carolina activates National Guard for winter storm

/ Published Dec. 27, 2010

BUTNER, N.C. - North Carolina National Guard Soldiers stand ready to assist the public in case of any emergency caused by the snow. 

Nine Soldiers reported to the N.C. National Guard’s Armory here last night for State Active Duty. 

“I was on my way to my mother’s house for Christmas dinner when I got the call (to be placed on State Active Duty),” said Army Spc. Jon Schwager, a Guardsman with the N.C. National Guard’s 1132nd Military Police Company. He recently returned from an overseas deployment with the N.C. National Guard’s 30th Heavy Brigade Combat Team.

“This is my first time doing a state mission,” he said. “I’m excited to be able to serve my community here at home.” 

Thirty-four Soldiers reported last night to armories in Butner, Rocky Mount, Elizabeth City, Winterville, and Mount Olive, N.C. 

Soldiers will prepare to help provide transportation, recovery or other missions as required by the North Carolina Emergency Management and emergency response officials. 

Each location will have two HUMVEEs and Guardsmen to assist in operations. 

Additional Soldiers will be on duty to maintain the armories for the HUMVEE teams.

The HUMVEE teams, mainly from the 514th and 1132nd Military Police Companies of 60th Troop Command, are based out of Winterville and Rocky Mount, respectively.  

All Guardsmen arrived at the National Guard armories late last night and will prepare for upcoming operations. 

The length of time that the Soldiers will remain on State Active Duty will be determined by the needs of the communities, but Soldiers are currently preparing to stay on duty for three days.

Army Sgt. 1st Class Jason C. Jones, 258th Asphalt Team readiness noncommissioned officer, was activated to state duty to maintain the armory for the HUMVEE team.

“I’m here to assist the HUMVEE team so that they have a working headquarters to base their community assistance mission out of,” he said. “My team and I will support these Soldiers so that they are able to fulfill their state mission while they are activated.”

In December 2009 and January of this year, about 50 Guardsmen were called to assist the N.C. State Highway Patrol, rescuing stranded motorists and transporting them to safety.
WISCONSIN ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (WIARNG) DRINKING 

WATER PFAS SNAPSHOT

The Army National Guard is committed to ensuring quality drinking water is provided to its 

Soldiers, and civilians. Proactive sampling is performed by the Army National Guard on its

drinking water systems, as well as, coordination with other purveyors to ensure perfluorooctane 

sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) remains below the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) lifetime health advisory (HA) level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). The 

EPA HA is not an enforceable or a regulatory standard, and represents a concentration in 

drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if the water is consumed 

over a lifetime.

Drinking Water Status: Finished drinking water, which is the treated water people drink at 

Hayward FMS #12 does not contain PFOS/PFOA above the EPA HA. Additionally, Army 

National Guard-provided drinking water complies with the standards of the Safe Drinking Water 

Act (SDWA), a federal law designed to protect the quality of drinking water supplied to the 

American public. The Army National Guard will continue to monitor on-base drinking water to 

ensure the EPA HA or a properly promulgated state drinking water standard is not exceeded.

Test Date: September 2020

PFOA + PFOS Results: Below the laboratory’s ability to detect

Future Testing Event: September 2023

Type of Drinking Water System: Army National Guard-owned

For Questions Contact: Wisconsin National Guard State Public Affairs Office

Office Phone Number: 608-242-3050

Office E-mail Address: ng.wi.wiarng.mbx.wi-pao@mail.mil

Water Quality Reports: A water quality report is not required for this location
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6966

ASKARI DANSO MS LUMUMBA , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

a nd JOHN BEVERLY; ANTHONY SHAW; TYRONE TROWELL; THOMAS ROSE , Plaintiffs ,

v.
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the VADOC; A. DAVID ROBINSON, VADOC Chief of Correctional Operations; DAVID ANDERSON, Warden at RNCC; GLOBAL TEL LINK (GTL) , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Vi rginia , at Roanoke

. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. ( 7:22

- cv - 00080

- MFU

- JCH )

Submitted : December 20, 2022 D ecided: December 27, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6966 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 Askari Danso MS Lumumba , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6966 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM:
Askari Danso MS Lumumba seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c) his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted.
The court’s order afford ed Lumumba leave to correct the deficiencies it identi fied and file an amended complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 47 (1949). “[A]n order that
d ismisses a complaint with leave to amend is not a final decision because it means that the
district court is not finished with the case.” Britt v. DeJoy , 45 F.4th 790, 793 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (citing Jung v. K. & D . Min. Co. , 356 U.S. 335, 336

- 37 (1 958)).
If Lumumba wishes to appeal from this order, he must first “waive [his] right to amend the complaint by requesting that the district court take further action to finalize its decision,”

Britt , 45 F.4th at 796 (citing Jung , 356 U.S. at 337), and he “ must obtain an additional, final decision from the district court finalizing its judgment,” id. at 797. Because Lumumba has not done so, the order he seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordi ngly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6966 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 3 of 3