alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 13.1
 Section 302 Certification
 John ODonovan
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




---



##### 



(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: September 11,
2006 /s/ John ODonovanName:
    
    John ODonovanTitle:
    
    Group Chief Financial OfficerBank of Ireland
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40680 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALFONSO CASARES, Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-20-2

__________________________________________

June 1, 2001 Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Alfonso Casares appeals his jury conviction for conspiracy to commit money laundering. He argues that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction. He also argues that the district court’s written judgment, in addition to referring to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), erroneously cites to § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) when it should have cited to § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i).2

After reviewing the briefs of the parties and the evidence adduced at trial, we hold that a rational trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that Casares conspired to commit money laundering. See United States v. Ortega Reyna , 148 F.3d 540, 543 (5th Cir. 1998); see also United States v. Wilson , ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Apr. 19, 2001, No. 00-20041), 2001 WL 396700 at *11 (listing elements of offense). With regard to Casares’ second argument, the Government concedes that the judgment’s citation to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) was error which should be corrected. Accordingly, we AFFIRM Casares’ conviction but REMAND the case to the district court so that the judgment’s citation to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) can be deleted and replaced with a citation to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i). See United States v. Sapp , 439 F.2d 817, 821 (5th Cir. 1971). AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.26


  


Loan Agreement


 


Contract No. : 2012JIYINDAIZIDI12100497


 


Borrower
: Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd.


Lender :
CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


Signing
Date : July 4, 2012


Loan Amount
: RMB50,000,000


 


Length of
maturity : From July 4, 2012 to July 4, 2013


Use of Loan
: Working Capital


Loan Interest : 7.2565%


Date of
Draft :July 4, 2012


Withdrawal
Amount : RMB50,000,000


Payment Method : The interest should be repaid by monthly. The
principal shall be fully repaid at the maturity date of the loan.


Repayment
Date :July 4, 2013


 


Loan Guarantee : Guaranty of Pledge


 


- Hebei Chuanglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd entered into The
Maximum Pledge Contract with the lender, with the contract no. 2012JIYINZUIQUANZHIZIDI12140568
# Statement from the National Guard Bureau Addressing Misinformation Circulating Online  

**23-009** |  Oct. 16, 2023    

NGB logo **(Photo by National Guard Bureau)**

An email circulating with Gen. Daniel Hokanson’s name that supposedly calls into question US commitment to Israel is categorically false. He did not write it. He did not send it.
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J UNE 8, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 14 60 2 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 4 :0 8- cr-0 00 36 -SPM -WCS-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us ALVIN CHRISTOPHER BRYANT, a.k .a. Itc hy, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S tate s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e North ernDis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Jun e 8 , 20 11 ) Befo re WILSON, MARTIN an d B LACK, Circ ui t Jud ge s PER CURI AM: Ran do lp h P . Murrel l an d Gwen do lyn Sp iv ey , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Alv in Ch ris to ph er Bry an t i n thi s d ire ctcri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withdraw fro mfurth er re pr es en ta ti on of t he ap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o And er s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de nt rev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s tha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t of th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re re co rd rev eal s n o arg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , an d B ry an t’s co nv ic ti on s an d s en te nc es are AFFIRMED .

2
AFS

- 14

- 439

- E

September 11, 2014

Exemption No. 8827D Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2004

- 19374

Mr

. Colin S. Fender Flight Test Engineering The Boeing Company

P.O. Box 3707 M/C 17

- PM Seattle, WA 98124

- 2207

Dear Mr

. Fender :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8827, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter date d August 12

, 2014 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of The Boeing Company (Boeing) for an extension of Exemption No. 8827, as amended. That exemption from § 91.529(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations permits

fl ight engineers, employed by Boeing, to serve as flight engineers on B

- 707 and B

- 747 aircraft if they have logged a minimum of 20 hours in lieu of the required 50 hours of flight time as flight engineers on the particular type aircraft within the preceding 12 months, provided the combined flight time in any B

- 707 or B

- 747 aircraft, or Level B, C, or D simulator that represents any B

- 707 or B

- 747 aircraft, is at least 100 hours in the preceding 12 calendar

months.

In your petition, you indicate that there ha s been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Regist er because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Boeing

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for th e issuance of Exemption No. 8827, as

a mended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113 and 44701

, which the FAA Administrator has delegat ed to me, I grant your petition to allow flight engine ers, employed by The Boeing Company , to serve as flight engineers on B

- 707 and B

- 747 aircraft if they have logged a minimum of 20 hours in lieu of the required 50 hours of flight time as flight engineers on the particular type aircraft within the preceding 12 months, provided the combined flight time in any B

- 707 or B

- 747 aircraft, or Level B, C, or D simulator that represents any B

- 707 or B

- 747 aircraft, is at least 100 hours in the preceding 12 calendar

months.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision ext ends the termination date of Exemption No. 8827, as amended, to January 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Leslie Smith Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-60638

Summary Calendar

CORDELLRA MCCALEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

PELICIA HALL, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS; JERRY WILLIAMS, Deputy Commissioner; TIMOTHY 

MORRIS, Warden, Mississippi Department of Corrections; OFFICER 

HUGHES, Correction Officer; M. S. CARTER, Case Manager; MR. BANKS, 

Deputy Warden,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:16-CV-111

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Cordellra McCaley, Mississippi prisoner # 164032, appeals the summary 

judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action alleging claims 

of deliberate indifference to his safety, deliberate indifference to his serious 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 6, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-60638 Document: 00515107496 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2019
No. 17-60638

2

medical needs, and failure to properly classify him based on the defendants’ 

actions before and after McCaley was assaulted and seriously injured by 

another inmate. McCaley also moves for appointment of counsel on appeal. 

“This [c]ourt must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own 

motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). An 

appellate court’s jurisdiction vests upon filing of the notice of appeal. Griggs 

v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982). “[A]n appeal filing 

deadline prescribed by statute will be regarded as jurisdictional.” Hamer v. 

Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chicago, 138 S. Ct. 13, 16 (2017) (internal 

quotation marks and citation omitted). In a civil matter, such as this one, a 

notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the judgment or 

order being appealed. 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A).

McCaley’s notice of appeal was untimely filed by more than four months. 

In a prior order, however, we construed his notice as a motion to reopen the 

appeal filing period and remanded to the district court for a ruling. See

§ 2107(c); FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(6). The district court denied the motion and 

declined to reopen the filing period. Consequently, McCaley’s notice of appeal 

remains untimely, and we therefore lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See 

§ 2107(a); FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A); Hamer, 138 S. Ct. at 16-17. Accordingly, 

we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Hamer, 138 S. Ct. at 16. 

We DENY the motion to appoint counsel.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL DENIED.

 Case: 17-60638 Document: 00515107496 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2019
**EXHIBIT 10.73**

 

**DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS**

 

Pursuant to our existing Board of Directors Compensation Plan, we pay each non-employee director an annual fee of $12,000 (payable quarterlyin arrears); the chairman of the Audit Committee is also entitled to an annual fee of $7,500 (payable quarterly in arrears). In addition, each Board and Committee member is entitled to a fee for each board or committee meeting of $500 for attendancevia teleconference and $1,000 for attendance in person. The Board chairman and each Committee chairman, if non-employee directors, are also entitled to an additional $500 for each meeting attended. Ordinary and necessary expenses incurred inattending Board and Committee meetings are reimbursed. 

 

Directors who are notemployees of the Company or any of our affiliates may also be entitled to receive options under our Equity Incentive Plan. During fiscal 2004, we did not grant any options to non-employee directors for their Board service. 

 

Richard Sayers is employed as a consultant in addition to his responsibilities as a Director.Mr. Sayers’ total remuneration for consulting during fiscal year 2004 was $129,673.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S)1350

       (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of Dynegy
Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Nick J. Caruso, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: May 14, 2003
                                                      /s/ Nick J. Caruso
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Nick J. Caruso
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
February Crop Production

Agricultural Statistics Board Briefing

Chris Hawthorn, Acting Chief

Crops Branch
Data Sources

Objective Measurement

Florida Citrus

Row Count

Florida Citrus

Utilization Florida Citrus Administrative Committee

Data Quantity of Fruit Packed or Processed

Field Surveys

1,444 Groves J

81,333 Rows J
February 2024 Citrus

Utilized Production

All Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↓ 1.1

% Change from Previous Season ↑ 11.1

Non‐Valencia Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↓ 1.7

% Change from Previous Season ↑ 5.2

Valencia Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↑ 25.6

Grapefruit

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↑ 6.4

Lemons

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 25.1

Tangerines

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 6.7

Production

(1,000 Tons)

906

2,7641,852

912348836

9.03

8.73

7.70

6.09

8.14 7.85

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.09.0

10.0

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 

Million Tons

All Citrus Produc

United States

6.35

6.09

5.09

3.88

5.43 5.25

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.0

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 

Million Tons

All Orange Produ

United States
2023 Field Crops

Acreage, Yield, and Production

Unit 

Sugarcane Ton 

% Change from Previous Estimate N/A ↑ 0.4 ↑ 0.6 

% Change from Previous Season N/A ↑ 0.5 ↓ 4.6 

N/A

Yield

(Units per Acre)

Harvested

(1,000 Acres)

Planted

(1,000 Acres)

Pro

(1

935 35.6 
Selected Upcoming Reports

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/index.php

2022 Census of Agriculture

Farms and Land in Farms Final Estimates ‐ Quick St

Crop Values Final Estimates ‐ Quick Stats

Farms and Land in Farms

Cattle on Feed

Corn, Soybeans, & Sorghum County Estimates

February 26 Crop Values

February 29 Agricultural Prices

Cotton System

Cotton System ‐ Annual

Fats & Oils

Fats & Oils ‐ Annual

Grain Crushings

Crop Production

Cotton Ginnings

Rice County Estimates

February 13

March 1

March 8

February 16February 23
USDA AGRICULTURAL OUTLOOK FO

Register to Attend In‐Person or Virtua
#StatChat
All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

(202) 720‐2127

(800) 727‐9540

nass@usda.gov
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2007 of Xinhua China Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Clement Wu, Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
- The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 			   Dated: May 15, 2007                                                                     /s/ Clement Wu                                                                                                                           Clement Wu, Chief Financial			                                                                                                   Officer and a Director (Principal			                                                                                                   Accounting Officer)
REF ID:A40047 

COPY 

• R lli i 'P R I 8 ! E 1' • 

1\.nR DEPl.RTME.)lT 

The AdJUt.lllt General's Office 

1\a5hi11gton 25, r.c. 

AG 311.5 (2 Sep 45)0B-S-B-M EM/1D.Jm 2B-939 Pentagon 

2 Septbmber 1945 

SUBJECT Release of Inform~tion Concerning Cryptan1lytic Activities. 

TO ihe Comm1ndlllg Generals, 

.rmy Jo ir Forces 

army Ground Forces 

Army ScI'Vl.ce Forces 

Comm.:inder-in-Chief, 

U S J.rmy F"rces, Pacific 

The Com.~3nding a~nerals, 

Th~'ltcrs o! Opcr~tions 

Defense CClllI'l.~nds 

Alask~n Dep~rtment 

l.b..litary Ci.strict of ~ash1ngton 

Indepcnd~mt Cornnnnds under the War Depa.rtment 

1. The follm'"lllg mc.aiorandmn from the President to the Sacretary 

of \1ar v11.ll be brought to the attention of all concerned \ll. thJ.n your 

com:rnnd 

appropriate departments of the Gov~rnment and tbe 

Joint Chi~f s of Sta.££ are hereby dl.rocted to ~.:..ke such steps 

as al'c necessary to prevent release to tho publ.Lc, except 

.., ith the specific c.pproval of the Presidf.nt in each case, of 

Inform'ltion regarding the past or present status, 

tcchriiqus or proceduras; degrse of success attallled, 

or .my specific results of any cryptanalytic unit 

acting under the authority of the U.S. rovernment 

or ::m.y repartmcnt thereof. 

2. Compli:mcc by ill concerned is dJ.racted. 

By order of the Secretary of \'far 

COPIE.5 FUR!ITIS.tlED 

/s/ Ed\vard F. ~itsell 

Emtn.RD F. WITSELL, 

:PlaJor General, 

Acting The AdJut~nt General. 

Ass~st~nt Chief of St.ff, C-2, 'TGS (20) 

Dist"l.bution I 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 09-26-2013 ursuantto E .0. 1352 
REF ID:A40047 

• 

SfSIS-lC 

• 

JJmY SERVICE FORCES 

Sign.' l Sc..curi ty agency 

iashington 25J D. c. 

• 

l? September 1945 

SUBJECT Release of Inf arJll.3t1on Concerning Cryptan~lytic Activities 

TO All M:Llit3ry and Civilian Personnel 

1. Your etkrtion is invited to the letter, reproduced on the reverse 

of this sheetJ from The adJUtPr..t General,, subJectJ "Release of Information 

Concerning Cryptan2l.ytic Activities" J dated 2 Sept~I1J.ber 1945. 

2. Cert~in unauthorized ne«S releases have recently bGcn I!Bde which 

would indicate a relax:iticn of security regarding Signal Intelligence 

activities. All personnel of this ~ency will observe strict compliance 

ln.th tlie a.irectiv(, issued by the President. 

3. It is request~d that this letter be brought to the attention 

of all personnel. 

BY ORDER OF COLONEL liLJES 

l Incl 

Ltr fr ~GOJ 2 Sep 45J fil~ ~a 311.5 (2 Sop 45) 

OB-5-B-M 

R1!18'fRI8'f1!lB 

• '
EXHIBIT 32

    CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


The undersigned,  Michael A. Grollman, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief
Executive  Officer and Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of National  Scientific
Corporation (the "Company"),  has executed this certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Company's  Annual
Report  on Form  10-KSB  for the  fiscal  year  ended  September  30,  2004 (the
"Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certificate as of the 18th
day of March, 2005.



/s/ Michael A. Grollman
--------------------------------------------
Michael A. Grollman
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
and Acting Chief Financial Officer