alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001002137
<NAME>                        SWISSRAY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     1,281,297
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,228,886
<ALLOWANCES>                               219,993
<INVENTORY>                                7,332,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           11,929,381
<PP&E>                                     7,284,410
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,001,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             23,761,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      13,944,865
<BONDS>                                    15,750,947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   140,062
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,614,546)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               23,761,189
<SALES>                                    17,295,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           17,295,882
<CGS>                                      13,529,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              13,529,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           19,345,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,638,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (20,177,901)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (20,177,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (832,849)
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (21,010,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (3.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (3.22)




</TABLE>
DECEMBER CROP PRODUCTION

Executive Summary

DECEMBER 11, 2012 8:30 AM

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service
USDA-NASS 

12-11-12

Contents

Field Crops Fruits/Nuts Specialty Crops

Cotton Citrus Dry Beans

Fall Potatoes Coffee

Sugarcane
USDA-NASS 

12-11-12

December 2012 Crop Production

Crop Unit

December

2012

% Change

from 

Previous

Forecast

% Change

from 

Previous

Season

Oranges Mil Tons 9.01 - 3.8 - <0.1

Grapefruit Mil Tons 1.14 - 7.9 - 2.8

Tangelos Thou Tons 50.0 - 7.4 - 3.8

Tangerines and 

 Mandarins Thou Tons 661 - 4.1 + 2.0
11.5

12.9

9.3 9.0

7.6

10.1

9.1

8.2

8.9 9.0 9.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U.S. Orange Production

Million tons

USDA-NASS 

12-11-12
USDA-NASS 

12-11-12

Crop Unit

December

2012

% Change 

from 

Previous 

Forecast

% Change 

from 

Previous 

Season

All Cotton

 Harvested Mil Ac 10.4 NC + 10.4

 Yield Lbs/Ac 793 - 1.1 + 0.4

 Production Mil Bales 17.3 - 1.1 + 10.8

December 2012 Crop Production
USDA-NASS 

12-11-12

17.2

18.3

23.3

23.9

21.6

19.2

12.8

12.2

18.1

15.6

17.3

10.0

14.0

18.0

22.0

26.0

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

U.S. All Cotton Production

Million bales
793

400

500

600

700

800

900

Pounds/Acre

U.S. All Cotton Yield

USDA-NASS 

12-11-12
U p la n d C o t to n Y ie ld , D e c e m b e r 1 , 2 0 1 2

P o u n d s a n d C h a n g e F r o m P r e v io u s M o n th

8 9 1 #

5 1

1 5 7 6 #

-4 8 1 0 8 4

3 3

1 6 1 7 N C

9 6 0 # N C

1 0 0 9 # N C

5 0 8

9 3

1 0 2 5 #

2 1

9 8 1

-3 1

1 0 1 8

4 3

9 7 0 N C

9 7 7

6 7 4 1 1 N C 9 0 8 #

3 2 U .S . 7 8 1

- 9

# R e c o r d H ig h Y ie ld N C = N o C h a n g e

9 2 2

2 6

5 3 9

-3 9

1 0 4 5

5 7

USDA-NASS 

12-11-12
USDA-NASS 

12-11-12

Crop Unit

December

2012

% Change 

from 

Previous 

Forecast

% Change 

from 

Previous 

Season

Dry Beans Mil Cwt 31.8 + 2.3 + 59.7

Fall Potatoes Mil Cwt 422 - <0.1 + 7.8

Coffee (HI) Mil Lbs 7.20 --- - 5.3

Sugarcane Mil Tons 32.1 - <0.1 + 9.9

December 2012 Crop Production
USDA-NASS 

12-11-12

Upcoming Reports 

Dec 14 Potato Stocks

Dec 28 Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

Dec 31 Agricultural Prices

Jan 11 Crop Production

Crop Production – Annual

Grain Stocks

Rice Stocks

Cotton Ginnings

Winter Wheat Seedings

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service
USDA-NASS 

12-11-12

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

202-720-2127

800-727-9540

nass@nass.usda.gov
1

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3397

___________

Leslie P. McCloud, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Stant Manufacturing, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 23, 1999

 Filed: July 29, 1999

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Leslie P. McCloud appeals from the district court’s1

 grant of summary judgment

to his employer, Stant Manufacturing, in his action asserting race discrimination and

retaliation claims. After de novo review, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court in its thorough order. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Puerto Rico Guard Partners with Sister Services in Joint Exercise
 
  By  Airman 1st Class Marrissa Rodriguez,
  CEIBA, Puerto Rico - The 156th Tactical Advisory Squadron, Puerto Rico Air National Guard, participated in a joint training field exercise March 15. The exercise at Roosevelt Roads included service members assigned to the 4th Marine Logistics Group, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve; Coast Guard Base San Juan, U.S. Coast Guard Reserve; Navy Reserve Center Puerto Rico, U.S. Navy Reserve; and 1st Mission Support Command, U.S. Army Reserve. The event allowed junior enlisted and noncommissioned officers to develop leadership skills, including survivability, adaptability and conflict response, during a simulated humanitarian crisis caused by an atmospheric event at Culebra, an island municipality of Puerto Rico. "This training is a great opportunity for us to experience the more tactical side of a potential joint operation, whether it's a humanitarian response where civilians could need shelter, food, aid or medicine or a combat operation where there are known adversaries," said U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Brian Broekemeier, the 156th Tactical Advisory Squadron commander. Exercise participants were evaluated on their effectiveness using tactical skills in leadership, teamwork, night combat operations, search and rescue, and crisis communication to deliver aid from Ceiba to affected civilians in Culebra. Air advisers assigned to the 156th TAS, PRANG, collaborated with other branch service members to employ skills required to work with allied nations. In the scenario, they made decisions while confronting heavy fire and managed casualties and tense encounters with civilians. "Participating in this exercise in a joint environment tested our crisis and conflict capabilities, allowing us to work cohesively to overcome challenges and prepare our Airmen for future fights," said U.S. Air Force Capt. Jose Velez, the 156th TAS intelligence officer and event evaluator. For U.S. Marine Corps Capt. Aneesah Akbar-Uqdah, the commanding officer assigned to Detachment 1 Landing Support Company, Combat Logistics Regiment 45, 4th Marine Logistics Group, Marine Corps Reserve, the training strengthened service members' capabilities beyond their job specialties. "In today's competitive operational environments, we can no longer afford to restrict the capabilities of reservists to the military occupational specialty, they were assigned; we must employ them to their fullest capability, which is a force multiplier," said Akbar-Uqdah. By participating in the exercise's theoretical and practical application, service members were exposed to tactical, operational, and strategic elements of war gaming while accomplishing mission-essential tasks for each unit, ensuring camaraderie and collaboration among participating services.
Exhibit 99.1

   FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION INCREASES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND 50%
                  AND ANNOUNCES 3-FOR-2 STOCK SPLIT


NEW YORK, NY:  December 15, 2005 - Financial Federal Corporation
(NYSE: FIF) today announced its Board of Directors declared a $0.15
per share quarterly dividend on its common stock payable January
31, 2006 on a pre-split basis to stockholders of record on January
5, 2006.  The Board of Directors also declared a 3-for-2 stock split
to be effected in the form of a stock dividend payable January 31,
2006 to stockholders of record on January 5, 2006.  The quarterly
dividend is $0.05 per share (50%) higher than the previous quarter's
dividend of $0.10 per share on a pre-split basis.

As a result of the stock dividend, stockholders will receive one
additional share of common stock for every two shares owned on the
record date.  Fractional shares will be paid in cash.  After the
stock dividend, the Company will have approximately 26.4 million
shares of common stock outstanding.


Financial Federal Corporation is an independent financial services
company specializing in financing industrial and commercial equipment
through installment sales and leasing programs for dealers,
manufacturers and end users nationwide.  For more information, please
visit the Company's website at www.financialfederal.com.


CONTACT:  Steven F. Groth, Chief Financial Officer
          (212) 599-8000
# New York Air Guard members help NORAD track Santa

/ Published Dec. 18, 2018

ROME, N.Y. – As North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) Tracks Santa ramps up this year, the New York Air National Guard members and Royal Canadian Air Force personnel of the Eastern Air Defense Sector play a key role Dec. 24.

 "NORAD has supported Santa Claus' Christmas Eve operations for 60 years and we are always delighted to help," said Col. Emil J. Filkorn, commander of the Eastern Air Defense Sector. "I can assure everyone that EADS will do everything in its power to assist Santa with his critical mission."

 EADS is a sector for the Continental NORAD Region. Like NORAD, it is a joint, bi-national military organization composed of U.S. and Canadian military forces, federal civilians and contractors. It is located within Griffiss Business and Technology Park in Rome, New York.

 Its mission is to counter all air threats to the eastern half of the continental U.S. through vigilant detection, rapid warning and precise tactical control of NORAD forces. The same radars, satellites and interceptors employed on Dec. 24 are used year round to defend Canada and the United States.

 Follow information on NORAD Tracks Santa, visit our website www.noradsanta.org, or follow us on Facebook and Twitter @NORADSanta
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofNUI Corporation (the "company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),I, John Kean, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, and I,A. Mark Abramovic, Sr. Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)      thereport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2)      theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
```
 
```

    /s/  John Kean, Jr.                        /s/ A. Mark Abramovic        John Kean, Jr.                             A. Mark Abramovic        President and                                Sr.Vice President, Chief Operating       Chief Executive Officer                 Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer       August 14, 2003                            August 14, 2003

**           **A signed copy of this written statement required bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the company. Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08266]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-WASO-D-COS-POL-18018; PWODIREP0] [PPMPSPD1Y.YM0000]


Notice of Amendment of the Site for the May 6-7, 2015, Meeting of 
the National Park System Advisory Board

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of change of meeting site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. Appendix 1-16, and Part 65 of title 36 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations, notice is hereby given of the change in the site for the 
May 6-7, 2015, meeting of the National Park System Advisory Board.

DATES: The Board will meet on May 6-7, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The meeting site originally published on March 8, 2015, in 
the Federal Register, 80 FR 12519, has changed. The new meeting site 
will be the Crystal Sands Room of the Hampton Inn Pensacola Beach Gulf 
Front, 2 Via De Luna Drive, Pensacola Beach, Florida 32561, telephone 
(850) 932-6800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shirley Sears, National Park Service, 
telephone (202) 354-3955, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#74271c1d0618110d2b2711150607341a04075a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5e6dddcc7d9d0cceae6d0d4c7c6f5dbc5c69bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The board meeting will be open to the 
public. The order of the agenda may be changed, if necessary, to 
accommodate travel schedules or for other reasons. Space and facilities 
to accommodate the public are limited and attendees will be 
accommodated on a first-come basis. Anyone may file with the Board a 
written statement concerning matters to be discussed. The Board also 
will permit attendees to address the Board, but may restrict the length 
of the presentations, as necessary to allow the Board to complete its 
agenda within the allotted time. Before including your address, 
telephone number, email address, or other personal identifying 
information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire 
comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made 
publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in your comment to 
withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we 
cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

    Dated: April 7, 2015.
Alma Ripps,
Chief, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-08266 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-EE-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### DELAPLAINE *vs.*THE CITY OF MADISON et al.

*By the Gourt,*

Cole, J.

The questions of fact and law presented by this case are substantially the same as those involved in the preceding case of *Dean vs. Henry W. Remington et*al.; and it is only necessary to refer to that case to ascertain our views upon this case.

The order of the circuit court sustaining the demurrer is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 PARTICIPATION SCHEDULE 
 April 19, 2013 

Douglas W. Hammond 
 We are
offering you the opportunity to become a Participant in the National Financial Partners Corp. 2012 Change in Control Severance Plan (the “Plan”) effective as of May 3, 2013, the termination date of the National Financial Partners
Corp. Change in Control Severance Plan (the “Original Plan”). All defined terms used herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Plan. 
 As a condition to your participation in the Plan, you must execute this Participation Schedule evidencing your agreement to be bound by all the terms of the Plan, including, without limitation, the
provisions of Article 11 thereof. 
 Except as may be provided under any other agreement between you and the Company, your
employment by the Company is “at will.” The Plan does not constitute a contract of employment or impose on the Company any obligation to retain you as an employee, to change the status of your employment, or to change the policies of the
Company regarding termination of employment. 
 For purposes of the Plan, your participation shall be determined based upon the
following: 
  

	 	(a)	Severance Factor: Two (2) 

  

	 	(b)	Benefit Continuation Period: 24 months 

 Executed as of this 26th day of April, 2013. 
  

			
	 /s/ Douglas W. Hammond

	 Douglas W. Hammond

	 Participant

	
	 NATIONAL FINANCIAL PARTNERS CORP.

	
	 /s/ Jessica M. Bibliowicz

	 By:
	 	        Jessica M. Bibliowicz
	 Title:
	 	        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
SENIOR LEADER ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR FEBRUARY 2022

****************************************************************************

GENERAL OFFICER ASSIGNMENTS:

MAJOR GENERAL CHAD PARKER

FROM: Director of Intelligence, J-2, National Guard Bureau, EAD

TO: Military and Mobilization Assistant to the Director, Defense Intelligence Agency, M-Day

MAJOR GENERAL JERRY PROCHASKA 

FROM: Deputy Commanding General, Army National Guard, Combined Arms Center and Fort 

Leavenworth, M-Day

TO: Deputy Director for Joint Force Development and Design Center, J-7, Joint Staff, M-Day

BRIGADIER GENERAL STEPHEN OSBORN

TO: Deputy Commanding General, Army National Guard, United States Army Maneuver Center of 

Excellence, Dual-Hat

BRIGADIER GENERAL SCOTT SHERMAN

TO: Deputy Chief of Staff, Army National Guard, Operations/G3 (Wartime), Eighth United States Army, 

Dual-Hat

BRIGADIER GENERAL MATTHEW SMITH

FROM: Deputy Director of Operations, Readiness, and Mobilization, Headquarters, Department of the 

Army, G-3/5/7, EAD

TO: Vice Director, Operations Directorate, J-3/4/7, National Guard Bureau, EAD
BRIGADIER GENERAL JONATHAN STUBBS

FROM: Vice Director, Operations Directorate, J-3/4/7, National Guard Bureau, EAD

TO: Deputy Director of Operations, Readiness, and Mobilization, Headquarters, Department of the 

Army, G-3/5/7, EAD

****************************************************************************
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

141602

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141602 COA: 296742 Wayne CC: 04-008570-FC MICHAEL DEWAYNE FOSTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 23, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
22127

#### LEXINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ONE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles MAYER, Defendant-Appellant. Charles MAYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEXINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ONE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Defendant-Respondent.

(316 S. E. (2d) 677)

Supreme Court

*37*Jay Bender*of *Belser, Baker, Barwick, Ravenel, Toal & Bender,*Columbia, *for Charles Mayer.*

*Bruce E. Davis,*Camden, and *James B. Richardson, Jr.,*of *Ham & Richardson,*Columbia, for *Lexington County School Dist. One Board of Trustees.*

June 7, 1984.

Harwell, Justice:

The appellant Charles Mayer seeks reinstatement as an assistant varsity football coach at Lexington High School. We affirm.

The appellant first asserts that, under school district tenure policies GBL and GBI, his employment as an assistant football coach cannot be discontinued absent an annual written evaluation. He also contends the policies give him a due process property interest. We have decided these issues adversely to the appellant’s position in the case of *Lexington County School District One Board of Trustees v. Bost,*316 S. E. (2d) 677 filed herewith.

The appellant contends the circuit court lacked jurisdiction over the school district appeal from the rein*38statement order of the Lexington County Board of Education. He argues that the portion of his case regarding discrimination in pay must be appealed under S. C. Code Ann. § 59-25-810 (1976) to the State Board of Education. However, the appellant’s allegations of discrimination in pay are closely connected to his action for reinstatement involving the construction of a school policy. The circuit court properly exercised jurisdiction under the procedures of §§ 59-19-510 and 59-19-560 (1976).

We believe the appellant has proved no discrimination in pay. The school district compensates its assistant coaches in two ways. They are employed on a ten-month basis rather than on the normal nine-month basis of classroom teachers with no extracurricular duties. In addition, coaches receive an annual salary supplement. The appellant’s most recent contract covers prevocational teaching but not coaching and has a nine-month term. He asserts that another prevocational teachér is paid for ten months work and that the district’s refusal to employ him for ten months as a prevocational teacher is discriminatory. We disagree. The evidence reveals that the other teacher performs additional duties related to his prevocational teaching during his extra month of compensation. The appellant’s discrimination claim lacks merit.

The judgment below is, accordingly,

Affirmed.

Littlejohn, C. J., Ness and Gregory, JJ., and Curtis G. Shaw, Acting Associate Justice, concur.