alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,354
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,688
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,240
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,243
<LOANS>                                         12,261
<ALLOWANCE>                                        145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,028
<DEPOSITS>                                      17,885
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,179
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  25,028
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    323
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  119
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   298
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   740
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 277
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 283
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              457
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      145
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (533)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (533)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (342)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.51)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     6.6
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  145
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UAVSA Release 1.3 June 2015

Post-flight Checklist

A. Aircraft

i. Unplug flight battery.

ii. Unplug video transmitter battery.

iii. Check aircraft temperatures of motors and other electronics.

iv. Check hardware on aircraft to ensure tightness.

v. Check propellers for any indications of chips, cracks, or wear beyond safe 

serviceability.

vi. Store aircraft in case.

vii. Put batteries back into storage cases.

B. Batteries

i. Check temperature of batteries.

ii. Check batteries for any indication of swelling.

iii. Check overall voltage of battery packs.

iv. Check individual cell voltages in battery packs.

v. Put batteries on storage charge.

C. Camera

i. Verify that recording has stopped.

ii. Turn off camera.

iii. Remove camera from gimbal.

D. Radios

i. Turn off radios.

ii. Put radios back into cases.

E. Ground stations

i. Turn off ground stations.

ii. Unplug batteries from ground stations.

iii. Check antennas on ground stations for serviceability .

iv. Pack ground stations into cases.

F. Other

i. Clean up all trash and debris in area.

ii. Notify property owners of departure.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MIGUEL BYGOYTIA

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 226

- C R

Appeal from the

168 th District Cour t

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20140D05522 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS Rachel Simon ’ s r equest for an extension of time within which to file

the Reporter ’ s Record until March 2 5 , 201 8

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS

COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Rachel Simon

, Court Reporter for the 168 th D istrict Court for

El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record and forward the same to this Cou rt on or

before March 2 5 , 201 8

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 2 6 th day of February , 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated August 31, 2006,accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of SPACEHAB,Incorporated on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-36779, effective November 3, 1997, File No. 333-43159, effective December 24, 1997, and File No. 333-43181, effective December 24, 1997) and Form S-4 (File No.No. 333-126772, effective September 6, 2005). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Houston, Texas 

August 31, 2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00399-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.D.F., et al., Children

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-01274

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant in relation to this 

appeal.

SIGNED December 9, 2015.

_____________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19096-19097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74642; File No. SR-NYSE-2014-59]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Partial 
Amendment No. 1, Amending Rule 13 and Related Rules Governing Order 
Types and Modifiers

April 3, 2015.
    On November 14, 2014, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``Exchange'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), 
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to 
amend Exchange Rule 13 and other Exchange rules governing order types 
and order modifiers. The proposed rule change was published in the 
Federal Register on December 4, 2014.\3\ On December 22, 2014, the 
Exchange submitted Partial Amendment No. 1 to the Commission.\4\ On 
January 14, 2015, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ the 
Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the 
proposed rule change, disapprove

[[Page 19097]]

the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether 
to disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\ On February 26, 2014, the 
Exchange withdrew the proposal SR-NYSE-2014-59.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73703 (December 4, 
2014), 79 FR 72039.
    \4\ The Exchange also submitted a copy of the amendment to the 
public comment file. See letter from Martha Redding, Chief Counsel, 
New York Stock Exchange, to Kevin M. O'Neill, Deputy Secretary, 
Commission, dated December 22, 2014.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74051, 80 FR 2983 
(Jan. 21, 2015). The Commission designated March 4, 2015, as the 
date by which it should approve, disapprove, or institute 
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule 
change.
    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08107 Filed 4-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
u.s. Department of

Transportation

Office of the Secretary

of Transportation

Subject:

Memorandum

Notice of Communication Date: in case:

Docket DOT -OST -2010-0018

FEB 05 2015

From: Susan L. Kurland

Assistant Secretary

and International

Reply to Reese Davidson

Attn. of: x68161

To: Chief, Dockets

In accordance with Department rules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the

following communication.

On January 29, 2015, Jamie Fleet, chief of staff for Senator Maria Cantwell of

Washington, called me and raised the Department's ongoing proceeding to

consider the allocation of a pair of slots for service to Tokyo's Haneda Airport

(Haneda). Mr. Fleet wanted to make sure that the Department had received the

two letters that Senator Cantwell had submitted in support of retaining Delta's

Seattle-Haneda frequencyl and reiterated the importance of Haneda service to

the Seattle community. I ~nformed Mr. Fleet that I could not discuss the

substance of an ongoing case, and that a summary of the communication would

be placed in the docket.

Please place this memorandum in Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018.

cc: Mr. Jamie Fleet
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1989-B  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet  and  statement  of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         424,384
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  247,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               671,815
<PP&E>                                         8,217,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,942,988)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,978,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          81,093
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,873,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,978,293
<SALES>                                        714,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               721,288
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  465,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                145,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            145,899
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   145,899
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
# Deployment in Iraq is a family affair for Kentucky National Guard unit

/ Published Dec. 27, 2006

Like many units in the Kentucky National Guard, the 410th Quartermaster Company, based in Danville, Ky., considers itself family. When you eat, sleep, and work with the same people day in and day out, it’s only natural that you become close.

But for eight guardsmen in the 410th, the bond is deeper than just ‘brothers-in-arms,’ its blood thick. There are two sets of siblings, a pair of first cousins and four members of one Danville family.	“The best part about being deployed together is that I know 100 percent that he has my back in all situations,” said Sgt. Ricky Mullins about his brother, Kenny.

The Mullins brothers grew up in Lincoln County watching two uncles and two older cousins enjoy the guard experience. When it was time for them to make the decision about joining the service, Ricky and Kenny enlisted into the same unit.

During the mid-1990s, eight members of the Mullins family were on the Kentucky National Guard books.

For Spc. Wanda Denham, having her younger brother, Spc. William Taylor, around is a good thing. Both Soldiers depend on each other for support and said the deployment would be more difficult if they weren’t together.

“Having my brother here is a blessing,” she said. “He is always there when I feel homesick.”

Like many Kentuckians, Staff Sgt. William Wagoner grew up around his first cousins. He and Sgt. Chris Tarter spent much of their youth with each other and view one another as brothers.

Both Soldiers spent time on active duty prior to joining the National Guard. Wagoner convinced Tarter to join the 410th in 2000 and the two agree that the unit has kept them very close in the last seven years.

“Now that we have our own families, we wouldn’t be nearly as close if it wasn’t for the guard,” Tarter said.

But for one family, the guard isn’t needed for them to stay close to one another.	Sgt. Brad Dunne, mess sergeant for the 410th Quartermaster, is proud to serve with his stepson, Spc. Aaron Castro, son-in-law, Spc. Daniel Montgomery, and nephew, Sgt. Chaz Garcia.

“It makes the deployment much easier,” he said, describing the unique support channel the family shares. On the other hand, he said, he has “much more to worry about.”

Each member of the family says he has grown closer to one another because of the time spent serving in the Kentucky National Guard.
# Maine National Guard Honored for Energy Initiative

/ Published Dec. 23, 2022

ARLINGTON, Va. – The Maine Army National Guard received the 2022 Secretary of the Army Energy and Water Management Award for Innovation and Technology. 

The MEARNG was recognized for conceptualizing and installing natural gas-fired heat pumps in the U.S. Property and Fiscal Office at Camp Keyes in Augusta.

"Modernizing the 23,000-square-foot administrative, logistics and printing warehouse has resulted in an energy savings of over 60%," said A.J. Ballard, Maine National Guard energy manager. 

The project, expected to save more than $70,000 a year in energy costs, marks the first natural gas-fired heat pump installation across the Department of Defense and the United States. Early indications show the pumps have reduced peak electrical demand by over 70 kilowatts per month and are on pace to eliminate the burning of over 3,800 gallons of fuel oil annually. 

The building was constructed in the early 1960s and previously heated by two 10-gallon-an-hour oil-fired boilers with baseboard radiation and eight rooftop air conditioning and ventilation units with minimal insulation. 

"[The modernization] included removing the large boiler system and the rooftop air conditioning units. The innovative technology utilized to achieve these savings was the new natural gas heat pumps, which reduced the building electric demand by over 50% with a simple payback in less than eight years."

"Resiliency and redundancy were compelling design factors, " Ballard said. 

"Previously, the generator could only provide emergency power to approximately 30% of the building, but now it can provide power to the entire building," Ballard said.

The new equipment is also easier to maintain.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Northeast   Mortgage
Corporation  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Sean Rogerson,  Vice-President  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Sean Rogerson
Sean Rogerson
Vice-President
(Principal Financial Officer)


May 14, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify, pursuant  to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 4, 2011
 /s/ Jerome R. Mahoney
 Jerome R. Mahoney,
 President, Chief Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer
# Innovation and agility are in National Guard’s DNA, Lengyel says

/ Published Dec. 16, 2016

ARLINGTON, Va. - The need to be innovative and agile was a key message Air Force Gen. Joseph Lengyel stressed in his remarks during a recent technological seminar near Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.

  The event served as an opportunity to present data, findings and emerging technologies between Air Force Research Laboratory scientists and engineers and industry-based partners. 

  "Your efforts here not only demonstrate the unity of effort between industry, the Department of Defense and other government agencies," noted Lengyel, chief of the National Guard Bureau, "but the sheer capacity of the best and brightest to keep our nation safe."

  Lengyel also addressed the challenges our nation faces confronting modern-day threats in a fiscally constrained environment.

  "Our adversaries have not been static and have invested in their technology," he observed. "Some of it they stole from us. Some they developed on their own. But our margin of technological superiority has diminished.

  "American innovation and technology is a serious force to be reckoned with," he said. "Our combined efforts with private industry and other government agencies will be a game-changer that keeps us out front.

  Despite the challenges, Lengyel insisted, the U.S. still possesses the world's greatest military.

  "We do things no other country can do," he said. "We are innovators, we find a way, that's what Americans do!"

  Lengyel also discussed the National Guard's role in the technological equation, highlighting the ability of the part-time force to work with the technology sector through partnerships.

  "Innovation and agility is inherently in our DNA as Citizen-Soldiers and -Airmen," he said. "Our unique culture embraces partnerships with public and private organizations, and our ability to galvanize efforts in confronting threats and challenges is a skill we must now use more deliberately to benefit the wide-ranging defense enterprise.

  "I sleep better at night," Lengyel added, "knowing that you all are continuing this great work to keep our technology at the leading edge."
Exhibit
31
 
 Chief
Executive and Financial Officer Certification (Section 302)
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
 Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Donald
Perks, certify that:
 
 (1) 
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Immune Technologies
Inc., (ARegistrant@).
 
 (2) 
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 (3) 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 (4) 
The registrant=s
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant=s
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 (5)
The registrant=’s
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant=s
auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant=s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ;
and
 
 (b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant=s
internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:
February 6, 2009
 
 
 By:
                  /s/ Donald PerksDonald
      PerksCEO,
      CFO