alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of eCareer Holdings, Inc., (“eCareer”) because of questions regarding the accuracy of publicly available information about the company's operations, including questions about the accuracy of statements in its filings regarding eCareer's use of investor proceeds for working capital, its sales of securities in unregistered transactions and compensation received by eCareer's CEO and chairman, including information in eCareer's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014, and Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2014. Its stock is quoted on OTC Link, operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc., under the ticker: ECHI.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of eCareer.

*Therefore, it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 8, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 21, 2015.                

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-08373 Filed 4-8-15; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OLXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theannual report on Form 10-K/A of SPACEHAB, Incorporated (the “Company”) forthe fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Brian K. Harrington,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)           the report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in thereport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/Brian K. Harrington                 |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian K. Harrington,  Senior Vice      |   |
| President and Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| December 2, 2008                  |   |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 

----
Floriculture Program

March 2019

NASS periodically conducts a program review for the Floriculture program. The primary purpose is to ensure that the 

NASS annual estimating program targets crops and states most relevant based on the latest available information.

The primary source of information for the program review is the Census of Horticultural Specialties.

States included in the estimating program for floriculture.

Total floriculture sales from the 2014 Census of Horticultural Specialties were arrayed from largest to smallest. States 

that account for the largest proportion of the total were identified for inclusion in the annual estimating program. This 

allows us to provide the most useful data to the agricultural sector in the most efficient means possible given the limited 

available resources.

Annual Floriculture Program

Estimating States

States

Removed

From Program

Alaska Hawaii

California Maryland

Colorado South Carolina

Connecticut

Florida

Illinois

Michigan

Ohio

Oregon

New Jersey

New York

North Carolina

Pennsylvania

Texas

Virginia

Washington

Wisconsin
Crops included in the estimating program for floriculture.

Floriculture crop sales data from the 2014 Census of Horticultural Specialties were arrayed from largest to smallest 

within each crop category (Annual Bedding Plants, Cut Flowers, Heraceous Perennials, Potted Flowering Plants, Foliage 

Plants, and Cut Cultivated Greens). Crops that account for the largest proportion of the total were identified for 

inclusion in the annual estimating program. This allows us to provide the most useful data to the agricultural sector in 

the most efficient means possible given the limited available resources.

Annual Bedding Plants

Program

Crops

Crops

Removed

From Program

Begonias Geraniums (from Seeds/Seedlings)

Geraniums (from Vegetative Cuttings)

Impatiens, New Guinea

Impatiens, Other

Marigolds

Pansies (Violas)

Petunias

Vegetable Type Bedding Plants

Cut Flowers

Program

Crops

Crops

Removed

From Program

Chrysanthemum, Pompon Alstroemeria

Dahlia Carnation

Gerbera Daisy Delpinium (Larkspur)

Gladioli Lisianthus

Iris

Lilies, All

Orchids, All

Peony

Roses, All

Sunflower

Snapdragon

Tulips
Herbaceous Perennials

Program

Crops

Crops

Removed

From Program

Chrysanthemum (Hardy/Garden) None

Daylily

Hosta

Ferns (Hardy/Garden)

Peony

Potted Flowering Plants

Program

Crops

Crops

Removed

From Program

Orchid, All African Violet

Poinsettia Azalea

Potted Spring Flowering Bulbs

Chrysanthemum

Easter Lilies

Potted Florist Roses

Foliage Plants

Program

Crops

Crops

Removed

From Program

Total Foliage Plants, Pots None

Total Foliage Plants, Hanging Baskets

Cut Cultivated Greens

Program

Crops

Crops

Removed

From Program

Leatherleaf Ferns None

Propagative Materials

Program

Crops

Crops

Removed

From Program

Annual Bedding/Garden Plants None

Cut Cultivated Greens

Cut Flowers

Foliage Plants for Indoor or Patio Use

Herbaceous Perennial Plants

Potted Flowering Plants
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/s/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President of the General Partner andprincipal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.Date:November 4, 2010
Exhibit 23.3

LOGO

December 8, 2008

Charles R.
Waldron

Chief Financial Officer

Learning Tree International,
Inc.

1805 Library Street, Suite 300

Reston, Virginia
20190-5304

RE: Valuation of Certain Auction Rate Securities

Dear Mr. Waldron:

Enclosed is our signed consent relating to the use of our valuation report
(Valuation Report) in conjunction with the submission of your Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending October 3, 2008 to the SEC. It is understood that our Valuation Report will not be included in the body (or exhibit) of the Quarterly
Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 on Form 10-Q, which will be filed around February 6, 2009 (as may be amended, the Quarterly Report) of Learning Tree International, Inc. (Learning Tree or the
Company). We further understand that our Valuation Report will not be included in the body (or exhibit) of the Quarterly Report for the quarters ending March 31, 2009 or June 30, 2009, or the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2009 on Form 10-K (as may be amended, the Annual Report) of Learning Tree.

We hereby consent to the
inclusion in the Annual Report and Quarterly Reports of references to our Valuation Report relating to the estimation of fair value of certain auction rate securities held by the Company as of October 3, 2008 and to references to our
firms name therein. We further consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report and Quarterly Reports.

Please
provide us with an exact copy of the Annual Report as filed with the SEC.



Sincerely,LOGOHoulihan Smith & Company, Inc.
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         I, Grant Miller certify that:

         To the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2003 by
USA Broadband, Inc. and to which this certification is appended (the "Periodic
Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of USA Broadband, Inc.

Date:  February 25, 2003                      /s/ Grant Miller
                                              -------------------------------
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

GEORGE ARTHUR RICHIE, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 18-0353 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2015-127292-001

The Honorable Jay R. Adleman, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

George Arthur Richie, Tucson

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Kenton D. Jones, Judge Michael J. Brown, and Judge Jon 

W. Thompson delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 9-13-2018
STATE v. RICHIE

Decision of the Court

2

P E R C U R I A M:

¶1 George Richie seeks review of the superior court’s order 

dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is the petitioner’s first petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 576-77, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s 

burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the 

petition. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that the petitioner has not shown any abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 Accordingly, we grant review and deny relief.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FARREN ST. GEORGE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

PEXCO, LLC,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-36068

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-03076-LRS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Lonny R. Suko, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2012** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: TASHIMA, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Farren St. George appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of his employer, Pexco, LLC, in his employment retaliation

claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

FILED

OCT 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
1 Washington state looks to federal law when analyzing retaliation

claims. See Stegall v. Citadel Broad. Co., 350 F.3d 1061, 1065 (9th Cir. 2003). 

2

district court’s grant of summary judgment. See Manatt v. Bank of America, 339

F.3d 792, 796 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm. 

St. George alleged Pexco laid him off in retaliation for a complaint, in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.,

and the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD), Wash. Rev. Code

49.60.210. To establish a prima facie case of retaliation under Title VII or

WLAD,1

 St. George must show that “1) he engaged in a protected activity; 2) he

suffered an adverse employment decision; and 3) there was a causal link between

the protected activity and the adverse employment decision.” Villiarimo v. Aloha

Island Air, Inc., 281 F.3d 1054, 1064 (9th Cir. 2002). 

The district court did not err in granting summary judgment because,

assuming St. George’s WLAD claim is not preempted by § 301 of the Labor

Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, he did not show a causal link

between the protected activity and his layoff. To demonstrate causation, St.

George claims that the plant manager stopped talking to him shortly after he

complained and that there was only a two-month period between the complaint and

the layoff. But St. George admitted that the supervisors who knew about his
3

complaint took no part in the layoff decision. And he failed to provide sufficient

evidence that the persons who made the layoff decision knew about his complaint. 

Cohen v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 686 F.2d 793, 796 (9th Cir. 1982) (“Essential to a

causal link is evidence that the employer was aware that the plaintiff had engaged

in the protected activity.”). His assertion that the plant manager avoided him

following the complaint falls short of creating a triable issue of fact. Surrell v. Cal.

Water Serv. Co., 518 F.3d 1097, 1103 (9th Cir. 2008) (“Conclusory statements

without factual support are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary

judgment.”). 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3689 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3689

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for an extension of the legislative authority of the Vietnam 
 Veterans Memorial Fund, Inc. to establish a Vietnam Veterans Memorial 
                visitor center, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR VIETNAM MEMORIAL 
              VISITOR CENTER.

    Section 6(b) of Public Law 96-297 (16 U.S.C. 431 note) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following:
            ``(5) any reference in section 8903(e) of title 40, United 
        States Code, to the expiration at the end of or extension 
        beyond a seven-year period shall be considered to be a 
        reference to an expiration on or extension beyond November 17, 
        2014.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 13, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3689

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide for an extension of the legislative authority of the Vietnam 
 Veterans Memorial Fund, Inc. to establish a Vietnam Veterans Memorial 
                visitor center, and for other purposes.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    Exhibit 4.50

   FOURTH AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT ON PROCUREMENT OF TELKOM-2 SATELLITE NO.K.TEL
                  27/HK.920/UTA-00/2005, DATED 21 FEBRUARY 2005

<TABLE>
<S>                     <C>
Parties:                1.  TELKOM; and

                        2.  Orbital Sciences Corporation ("CONTRACTOR").

Preceding Agreements:   1.  Main agreement - No.K.TEL.191/HK.810/UTA-00/2002
                            dated 24 October 2002;

                        2.  Amendment No. 1 - No.K.TEL.260/HK.820/UTA-00/2003
                            dated 15 December 2003;

                        3.  Amendment No. 2 - No.K.TEL.66/HK.920/UTA-00/2004
                            dated 31 March 2004;

                        4.  Amendment No. 3 - No.Tel.248/HK.930/UTA-00/2004
                            dated 29 October 2004.

Amended Provisions:     1.  The parties agree to amend the contract price and
                            payment, the fixed price for TELKOM-2 Satellite
                            and the price for personnel training;

                        2.  The parties agree to amend technical provisions on
                            the training and internship program;

                        3.  The parties agree to amend the milestone schedule
                            payment. The parties also agree to amend the
                            cumulative payment for milestone number 16.
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,628,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,364,879
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (319,500)
<INVENTORY>                                    168,664
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,183,804
<PP&E>                                       1,745,023
<DEPRECIATION>                               (677,912)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,008,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,303,847
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,605
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,633,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,008,111
<SALES>                                     18,407,770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,407,770
<CGS>                                        3,027,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,648,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,111,924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               267,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,128,571)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,128,571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,128,571)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)
        

</TABLE>
H. R. 3606 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine 

An Act 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to make a technical correction to an amendment 

made by the Credit CARD Act of 2009. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit CARD Technical Corrections Act of 2009’’. 

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

Section 163(a) of the Truth in Lending Act (U.S.C. 1666b(a)), 

as amended by section 106(b) of the Credit Card Accountability 

Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, is amended by inserting 

‘‘a credit card account under’’ after ‘‘payment on’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)   I, Ed Bailey, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Financial Officer, of LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2010 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  November 15, 2010 By: /s/ Ed Bailey  Ed Bailey  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. and will be retained by LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.