alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Pennsylvania National Guard provides key support at international exercise

/ Published Nov. 5, 2015

ZARAGOZA, Spain – About 20 Pennsylvania Army National Guard Soldiers, assigned to the 213th Regional Support Group, or RSG, are taking part in Exercise Trident Juncture 15, working as a vital asset in the exercise's tactical operations center.

Trident Juncture 2015, which boasts more than 36,000 participants from more than 30 nations, is being conducted primarily in Spain, Portugal, and Italy with additional activities in Belgium, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands and Norway, as well as maritime operations in the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. 

Officers and noncommissioned officers from the 213th RSG originally volunteered for the opportunity to work in Europe to support the exercise and have worked almost non-stop over the past weeks. 

Capt. Andrew Campbell, an operations officer, assigned to the 213th RSG said the exercise has been fantastic and a bit different than what he is used to in the United States.

"It is a little bit of a change of pace from our home station duties," Campbell said. "It is a great experience for us. We get to work with the active-duty component and our multinational partners."

Campbell also adds that working in this NATO environment has empowered many of the 213th's junior noncommissioned officers and is a great way to develop them in a multi-nation environment.

"It gives them exposure to militaries that are different than the United States military and they get to see how other militaries do things," he said.

Nicole Brittain, noncommissioned officer in charge of the 213th's personnel division, said the work her unit is doing at Trident Juncture is critical to supporting the mission. 

Brittain emphasizes that one of the responsibilities she oversees here is to ensure all U.S. personnel taking part in the exercise are accounted for. Any discrepancies or injuries are immediately reported.

The Pennsylvania National Guard is also part of the State Partnership Program, or SPP, which partners the United States with other countries. 

Brittain explained that Pennsylvania is partnered with Lithuania, a nation that is taking part in the current exercise, and that the SPP is critical for maintaining cohesion between the two groups.

"It is a true partnership between the Lithuanians and us," she said. "They feel very comfortable with us working side-by-side. No matter what happens here [in Europe] or anywhere, the Pennsylvania National Guard is ready to go."

The integration and utilization of the National Guard and reserve components are one of the crucial components that make up the five pillars of a "Strong Europe."

The National Guard plays a critical role by supporting exercises across the Atlantic Ocean. It is not only a way for these Soldiers to meet their required yearly two-week training time but also a way to build partnerships with nations they may work with in a combat environment.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08225]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-1442-000]

Municipal Energy of PA, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Municipal Energy of PA, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Sec.  385.211 and Sec.  
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is April 23, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email [email protected]. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 3, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08225 Filed 4-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Mushroom Program

August 2019

Every 5 years NASS conducts a program review following the completion of the Census of Agriculture. The primary 

purpose is to ensure that the NASS annual estimating program targets commodities and states most relevant based on 

the latest available information. Last fall we announced the program review and requested stakeholder input. 

The primary source of information for the program review is the Census of Agriculture, since it is the most 

comprehensive source of data; however we also take into consideration estimates from the current annual estimating 

program and administrative data. 

The program changes balance resources across all of the programs included in the annual estimating program, which 

represents over 400 individual reports.

Eliminate Region Estimates

NASS is discontinuing the publication of region estimates. All States included in the estimating program will be published 

individually (subject to disclosure rules).

Eliminate the Publication of Number of Growers

NASS is discontinuing the publication of the number of growers. Similar to other estimating programs, these data will be 

available in the Census of Agriculture only.
States included in the estimating program for mushrooms.

Total mushroom sales from the 2017 Census of Agriculture were arrayed from largest to smallest. States that account 

for the largest proportion of the total were identified for inclusion in the annual estimating program. This allows us to 

provide the most useful data to the agricultural sector in the most efficient means possible given the limited available 

resources. Historically all States were included in the program, however the 8 States identified for inclusion in the 

program moving forward accounted for more than 90% of the total mushroom sales reported in the 2017 Census of 

Agirculture.

Annual Mushroom Program

Estimating States

States Removed

From Program

California Alabama

Florida Alaska

Illinois Arizona

Maryland Arkansas

Oklahoma Colorado

Pennsylvania Connecticut

Tennessee Delaware

Texas Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oregon

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 12.1

                             AETNA INDUSTRIES, INC.
                        INFORMATION ON RATIO OF EARNINGS
                          TO FIXED CHARGES COMPUTATION
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      1997          1996        1995          1994        1993
<S>                                                <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>
Net income (loss) before the effect
 of accounting changes                             $   (2,361)  $   3,693    $   4,576    $   6,595     $   915
Income taxes                                           (1,099)      2,105        1,877        4,000         930
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------
Pre-tax income (loss)                                  (3,460)      5,798        6,453       10,595       1,845
Fixed charges per below                                11,776      10,629        9,795        9,800       9,659
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------
Earnings (losses) from operations                       8,316      16,427       16,248       20,395      11,504
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------

Fixed charges:
    Interest expense                                   10,263       9,022        8,579        8,929       9,020
    Debt amortization                                     607         763          442          198          99
    Rent expense - portion of operating
     rentals representative of the interest factor        906         844          774          673         540
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------
Total fixed charges                                    11,776      10,629        9,795        9,800       9,659
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------

Ratio of income to fixed charges                          (1)         1.5          1.7          2.1         1.2
</TABLE>


(1) The  deficiency  of earnings  from  operations  versus fixed  charges was
    $3.5 million for the year ended December 28, 1997.
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 32

                         SHELBOURNE PROPERTIES II, INC.
                          FORM 10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
                          ----------------------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelbourne Properties II Inc., (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.

Date:  November 12, 2003            /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                    ---------------------
                                    Michael L. Ashner
                                    Chief Executive Officer


Date:  November 12, 2003            /s/ Carolyn B. Tiffany
                                    ----------------------
                                    Carolyn B. Tiffany
                                    Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.4


              JOINDER TO ADVISED REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT
                                       AND
                          JOINDER TO SECURITY AGREEMENT


           The  undersigned,  a  subsidiary  of Transit  Group,  Inc., a Florida
corporation,  hereby  joins in that  certain  Advised  Revolving  Line of Credit
Agreement  dated as of December 18, 1997 (the "Loan  Agreement")  by and between
AmSouth Bank, a bank organized  under the laws of Alabama  ("Lender"),  Borrower
and the  Guarantor  (each as  defined in the Loan  Agreement),  and agrees to be
bound by all of the terms of the Loan  Agreement,  together with any amendments,
modifications  and  restatements  thereof,  which  terms are  applicable  to the
undersigned.

           The  undersigned  further  joins in that certain  Security  Agreement
dated as of December 18, 1997 (the "Security  Agreement") by and between Lender,
Borrower and the Guarantor (each as defined in the Loan  Agreement),  and agrees
to be bound by all of the terms of the  Security  Agreement,  together  with any
amendments,  modifications and restatements thereof,  which terms are applicable
to the undersigned.

           The  undersigned  further  warrants  that  it is a  corporation  duly
organized  and  existing  under  the laws of the  State of  Indiana  and is duly
qualified  to do  business  in the  States  of  Indiana,  Kentucky  and in  each
jurisdiction  where the failure to be so qualified would have a material adverse
effect on Borrower. To the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief, it is
in material  compliance with all applicable  laws and regulations  governing the
conduct of its business and governing  consummation of the  transactions and its
principal place of business is located in the State of Kentucky.

           Dated as of the 14th day of January, 1998.


Signed, sealed and delivered             RAINBOW TRUCKING SERVICES, INC.,
in the presence of:                      an Indiana corporation


                                         By: /s/ Philip A. Belyew
                                         Philip A. Belyew,
                                         Chairman of the Board
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0167. DONALD A. WEISSMAN v. JUDY BAHR.

Frederick Bahr and Judy Bahr divorced in 2015. Donald A. Weissman

represented Frederick Bahr in the action. Weissman filed a contempt action against

Judy Barr to enforce provisions of the Bahrs’ divorce decree related to the division

of personal property, which required that such disputes be submitted to arbitration. 

After the arbitration, Weissman served a subpoena on the judge who arbitrated the

case, which Judy Bahr moved to quash. The trial court held Weissman in contempt

and ordered that he pay attorney feesto JudyBahr, pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14, and

granted Judy Bahr’s motion to quash the subpoena. Weissman seeks discretionary

review of the trial court’s order.

The Georgia Supreme Court has jurisdiction over all divorce and alimony

cases, including those cases ancillary to the divorce proceedings. See Ga. Const.

1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6); Morris v. Surges, 284 Ga. 748, 750 (2) (670 SE2d

84) (2008). As the underlying subject matter of this application is divorce, it is

hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 02, 2016

12/02/2016
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Bruce A. Williamson, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periodsindicated.        Date: November 8, 2007 By:  /s/ Bruce A. Williamson    **Bruce A. Williamson**    **Chairman of the Board and**
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 8, 2016

s0229

Order 

Clerk

March 8, 2016

151227 & (18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151227

COA: 322796

Grand Traverse CC:

76-003094-FH; 76-003095-FC

JACK LOWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to amend the application for leave to appeal is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2014 order of the Court 

of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief 

from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-132152 and333-132800 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 30, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the merger of Mariner Energy, Inc.’sparent company on March 2, 2004), relating to the financial statements of Mariner Energy, Inc.appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mariner Energy, Inc. for the year ended December31, 2006.Deloitte & Touche LLPHouston, Texas
Exhibit 21

COVANCE INC.  SUBSIDIARY LIST

CJB Inc.DelawareCovance AGSwitzerlandCovance (Argentina) SAArgentinaCovance Asia-Pacific Inc.DelawareCovance (Asia) Pte. Ltd.SingaporeCovance Bioanalytical Services LLCDelawareCovance (Canada) Inc.CanadaCovance Central Laboratory Services Inc.DelawareCovance Central Laboratory Services Limited PartnershipIndianaCovance Cardiac Safety Services Inc.WisconsinCovance Central Laboratory Services SASwitzerlandCovance Clinical and Periapproval Services AGSwitzerlandCovance Clinical and Periapproval Services GmbHGermanyCovance Clinical and Periapproval Services LimitedSwedenCovance Clinical and Periapproval Services SABelgiumCovance Clinical and Periapproval Services SARFranceCovance Clinical Research Unit Inc.FloridaCovance Market Access Services Inc.DelawareCovance International Holdings B.V.NetherlandsCovance Japan Co. Ltd.JapanCovance LimitedUnited KingdomCovance Clinical and Periapproval Services Ltd.United KingdomCovance Laboratories LimitedUnited KingdomCovance Clinical Research Unit Ltd.United KingdomCovance Hungary Consultancy Limited Liability Company.HungaryCovance Periapproval Services Inc.DelawareCovance (Polska) Sp.Zo.)PolandCovance Preclinical CorporationWashington

---



Covance Laboratories GmbHGermanyCovance Laboratories Inc.DelawareCovance Research Products Inc.PennsylvaniaCovance Virtual Central Laboratory B.V.The NetherlandsCovance Antibody Services Inc.CaliforniaCovance Pty. Ltd.Australia

2

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 22.1


<PAGE>

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


               NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                 STATE OF INCORPORATION
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     1.   Schlotzsky's Real Estate, Inc.                   Texas
     2.   Schlotzsky's Restaurant, Inc.                    Texas
     3.   Schlotzsky's Brands, Inc.                        Texas
     4.   Schlotzsky's Equipment Corporation               Texas
     5.   DFW Restaurant Transfer Corporation              Texas
     6.   56th & 6th, Inc.                                 Texas
     7.   SREI Turnkey Development, L.L.C.                 Texas
### Request for Informat ion Jude M. Chastain (FAA-2015-3329) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Chastain: This letter is to inform you that the following inform ation is missing from your peti tion (Docket No. FAA-2015-3329). This information is necessary for the Federal Av iation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Op erations Manual (MPTOM) wh ich is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your inte ntion by the requested response date listed below.
Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information de scribed above by December 15, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we wi ll close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feelfree to contact me at (202) 267-2999. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : T uesday , December 01, 2015 7:54 AM To: j uddchastain@gmail.com