10

i!. jt

~i25

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU

/ / I, ~
FISCA-L YEAR 1994

ANNUAL

OF THE

R E V I E W

CHIEF

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU

Wp-.Ilo
To THE SECRETARIES OF THE

ARMY AND THE AIR FORCE:

he Annual Review of the Chief,

National Guard Bureau for FY94 is respectfully submitted.

The Army National Guard ended this

fiscal year with fewer personnel and fewer

units than in Fiscal Year 1993. Readiness and

force structure issues converged with the

Department of the Army's approval of 15

"Enhanced Brigades" for the Army Guard.

These brigades will be organized and

resourced in order to mobilize, train and to

be available for deployment 90 days after

call-up, for employment in regional conflicts

or to reinforce active component divisions in

any crisis.

As the active Air Force has been sharply

reduced in size, the Air National Guard's role

in the Total Force has grown. The Kansas

Air National Guard's 184th Bomb Wing completed its transition to the B-lB bomber in

July '94, marking the first-ever bombers in

the Air National Guard inventory. And while

the total number of Air Guard fighterinterceptor units has declined, the Guard in

January 1994 assumed responsibility for the

entire Air defense of the continental U.S.

against air-breathing airborne threats.

This fiscal year, men and women of the

National Guard were part of military and

humanitarian relief operations in Somalia,

Rwanda, and Bosnia. In addition, National

Guard units and individual personnel continued to deploy all over the globe for realistic

training. The past year's statistics on

increased numbers of personnel called up for

state duty continued in FY94, as the National

Guard responded to severe flooding in the

Southeastern U.S. and forest fires in the

Western states.

In December 1994 the National Guard

celebrated its 358th birthday. As the twentieth century draws to a close, the nation's military is in a period of transition. The National

Guard, the U.S. military's oldest component

remains ready to serve both state and nation,

as it has for almost 360 years.

,- Jolm i D'AraujoJg,.

Major General, USA

Acting Chief NGB

p

i
.2)'

4<

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mission, Organization & Administration .................................... vi

Reserve Component Automation System....................................1

Policy & Liaison ........................................................................... 1

Public Affairs................................................................................. 4

Inspector General

Tur.. Alvncats

............................................................................ 7

1i

/ N

V-4 4

.9

Force Structure

Comptroller.

Engineering ................................................................................. 54

Inform ation System s ................................................................. 54

Environm ental Program s......................................................... 57

Aviation .................................. ........................ 60

eN-.-r

A'

t

S

4)

Internal Review & Audit Compliance ....................................... 13

Hum an Resources .......................................................................... 15

Equal Opportunity ......................................................................... 19

Counterdrug Task Force ........................................................ 21

Acquisition................................................................................... 25

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

Organization, Training, & Readiness.................................... 30

Logistics ......................................................................................... 39

Personnel...................................................................................... 43

N

49

c-I

m
AIR NATIONAL GUARD

Operations, Plans & Program s .................................................... 66

Training ........................................................................................ 73

Personnel ...................................................................................... 74

Plans, Programs & Manpower .................... 77

Financial M anagem ent ............................................................ 79

Command, Control, Communications, & Computers .............. 80

Logistics ......................................................................................... 81

Engineering & Services ................................................................ 86

Civil Engineering ...................................................................... 86

Security ........................................................................................ 90

Counterdrug Directorate ........................................................ 91

Medical Services......................................................................... 91

APPENDICES

Chiefs of the National Guard Bureau ................................... 96

State Adjutants General ............................................................ 97

United States Property & Fiscal Officers ........................... 98

National Guard Bureau Staff ........................................................ 99

Army National Guard Statistics ................................................ 101

Air National Guard Statistics .................................................... 103

Military Support & Counter Drug Missions .......................... 126

1-1-
Reserve Component Office of the Chief

Automation System

Counsel to CNGB Internal Review & Audit Policy & Liaison

Administrative Services Compliance Public Affairs

Acquisition Judge Advocate Assistant for Property and

Counterdrug Task Force Human Resources Fiscal Affairs &

Special Competition

General Officer Management Equal Opportunity Advocate

Inspector General Executive Initiatives International Initiatives

nt Office

Chief of Staff

Secretary of the General Staff

Facility Management Office

I

Research & Staff

Support

Directorate of

Engineering

Environmental

Programs

Directorate

Comptroller

Directorate

Operations, Training

and Readiness

Directorate

Personnel Directorate

Force Management

Directorate

Aviation & Safety

Directorate

Logistics Directorate

Information Systems

Directorate

Professional Education

Center (N. Little

Rock, Arkansas)

Operational Support

Airlift Project Director (Ft. Belvoir, VAY

8201st Mission Support Sqdn

DIRECTO
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

PERSONNEL MAJOR UNITS

396,928 Personnel 8 Divisions (5 Inf, 1 Lt Inf, 1 Armd, 1 Mech)

26,820 Technicians 22 Brigades (10 Inf, 6 Mech, 4 Armd, 1 Lt Inf, 1 Cay)

24,180 Active Guard/ 1 Armored Cavalry Regiment

Reserve (AGR) 2 Special Forces Groups

1 Infantry Group (Arctic Recon)

16 Field Artillery Brigade Headquarters

3 Medical Brigade Headquarters

4 Engineer Brigade Headquarters

3 Military Police Brigade.Headquarters

1 Transportation Brigade Headquarters

1 Corps Artillery Headquarters

1 Signal Command Headquarters

1 Support Command Headquarters

3 Air Defense Artillery Brigade Headquarters

1 Aviation Brigade Headquarters

1 Chemical Brigade Headquarters

AIR NATIONAL GUARD

PERSONNEL ORGANIZATION

113,586 Personnel 1669 Units

24,063 Technicians 24 Wings (Flying)

9,312 Active Guard/ 67 Groups (Flying)

Reserve (AGR) 97 Squadrons (Flying)

5 Training Units (Flying)

330 Non-Flying Support Units

8 Combat Communications Groups

37 Communications Squadrons

26 Air Control Squadrons

19 Electronic Installation Squadrons

3 Air Control Groups
MISSION, ORGANIZATION

AND ADMINISTRATION

The National Guard is rooted in the

concept that able-bodied citizens have the

privilege and responsibility of bearing

arms for the common defense. This tradition began in America in the 17th century

with the organization of militia units in

the various colonies.

The National Guard traces its direct

heritage to the organization of the North,

South, and East regiments in the

Massachusetts Bay Colony on December

13, 1636. It has fought in every American

war from the Pequot War of 1637 to

DESERT STORM.

At the end of the Revolutionary War,

it was recognized that the militia had

played an important role in winning the

nation's independence. The authors of

the Constitution empowered Congress to

"provide for organizing, arming and disciplining the militia." However, recognizing

the militia's state role, the Founding

Fathers reserved the appointment of

officers and training of the militia to

the states.

Subsequent national military policy

increased the National Guard's role as a

federal reserve force. Today, in accordance with the traditional military policy

of the United States, the National Guard

continues its historic mission as an integral part of the nation's first-line defense.

Support of the active forces is on a

worldwide basis, with training conducted

in geographic areas associated with U.S.

interest. Air National Guard fighter-interceptor units provide 24-hour air defense,

and Army National Guard units round out

active Army divisions. Upon mobilization,

both Army and Air National Guard units

would be assigned to major commands of

the Army and Air Force.

While its federal reserve role has

been strengthened, the National Guard

of each state remains, constitutionally,

a state-administrated force. The state

mission is to provide units trained and

equipped to protect life and property

and to preserve peace, order and public

safety, under the order of state and

federal authorities. FY 94 saw large

multi-state call-ups for disaster relief

operations in response to the ravages

of the unprecedented midwest floods

of the summer and fall.

PGXS(BC"ooo
WrI --I I G IlA i ' w C-)I.\I.tx I I k- t~~ t4(J mI D. Inkt I , i-.\ t I)

I'~(ck AN %i Aii - /O\tr~ IE IhZ ICiT

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU

The National Guard Bureau was

created in 1908 as the Division of IVlilitia

Affairs in the office of the Secretary

of War. In 1910, the Division was placed

under the Chief of Staff. Under the

National Defense Act of 1916 the Division

was redesignated as the Militia Bureau

and became one of the bureaus of the

War Department.

In 1933, the Militia Bureau was

redesignated the National Guard Bureau.

After World War If, the Bureau became

a joint agency of the Department of the

Army and the Air Force. The Chief,

National Guard Bureau, reports to the

Secretaries of the Army and the Air

Force through the respective Chiefs of

Staff and is the principal staff advisor

for National Guard affairs.

The National Guard Bureau is both a

staff and operating agency. As a staff

agency, the Bureau participates with the

Army and Air Staffs in the development

and coordination of programs pertaining

to or affecting the National Guard. As an

operating agency the National Guard

Bureau formulates and administers the

programs for the training, development

and maintenance of the Army and Air

National Guard and acts as the channel

of communications between the states

and the Departments of the Army and

the Air Force.

The Chief of the National Guard

Bureau is appointed by the President,

with the advice and consent of the

Senate. The Chief, National Guard

Bureau is appointed for a term of four

years, and is eligible to succeed himself.

The grade authorized for this position is

lieutenant general.

The Vice Chief of the National Guard

Bureau is appointed by the Secretary of

Defense with the advice and consent of

the service secretaries, the Vice Chief

serves with the Chief as advisor to the

Chiefs of Staff of the Army and the Air

Force. In addition to assuming the duties

of the Chief when required, the Vice

Chief oversees the National Guard

Bureau staff, including the Army and Air

directorates. The grade authorized for

this position is major general.
RESERVE

COMPONENT

AUTOMATION

SYSTEM

The Reserve Component

Automation System (RCAS) is a

secure, automated information

system that supports the decision-making needs of commanders, staff and functional managers responsible for Reserve

Component forces. When completed, over 8,000 units will be

connected through a wide area

network. The RCAS program

continues to progress under

intensive management by the

RCAS Program Manager, a

Senior Executive Service member, chartered by the Chief,

National Guard Bureau and

the Secretary of the Army.

Improvements have been

achieved in overall network

performance and the program

continues to move forward.

Once fielding of hardware and

applications of software have

been completed, the RCAS program will be capable of exchanging information with Active and

Reserve Component information

systems. In addition to accurate

information supporting mobilization planning and execution,

commanders at all levels will

have the ability to assess training

strategies and monitor the logistics functions.

The RCAS program began

FY94 with 381 units fielded with

hardware and office automation

software, and ended by completing the fielding of 1500 units.

Manifestation of the RCAS

program's useful performance

was demonstrated during the

Oregon fires. The RCAS was

executed as a method of communication and full mobilization of

guard units. Its efficiency and

effectiveness facilitated the needs

of commanders and units during

the disaster and continued

through the aftermath.

POLICY AND

LIAISON

The Office of Policy and Liaison

consists of five primary functional areas: Congressional Liaison,

Association Liaison, Foreign

Liaison, Protocol, and Policy

and Administration.

-i-
Congressional and

Association Liaison

The Congressional and

Association Liaison Branch

serves as the point of contact

between the Congress of the

United States, private military

and non-military Associations,

and the National Guard Bureau

(NGB). This branch responds to

all requests from the Congress

regarding National Guard issues

and programs. Responses to

these requests range from

arranging detailed information

briefs by staff experts for

members of Congress and congressional staffers to staffing

and writing answers to constituent inquiries. In FY94,

this branch responded to 2,770

written and thousands of telephonic inquiries from Congress

and the White House.

The staff of this branch is

responsible for the Chief of the

National Guard Bureau's Posture

Statement, preparing the

National Guard General Officer

Leadership to testify at congressional hearings, attending those

hearings, and preparing hearing

summaries. Additionally, the staff

attends congressional hearings of

interest to the National Guard

and provides summaries for NGB

leadership and select staff.

The primary objective of

Association Liaison is to work

with both military and non-military associations to ensure that

accurate information is being

disseminated concerning the

National Guard. Primary emphasis is placed on National Guard

Associations, the National Guard

Association of the United Stated

(NGAUS), Adjutant General

Association of the United States

(AGAUS), and the Enlisted

Association of the National Guard

of the United States (EANGUS).

Each year, the National Guard

Bureau functional experts review

numerous resolutions that are

submitted from National Guard

Associations for coordination

and comment.

Foreign Liaison

The Foreign Liaison section had

a banner year with many new

issues and interactions. Several

major events, in addition to the

usual visit requests and briefings

scheduled with the embassies,

were successfully concluded.

Fiscal Year '94 began with an

October Attache visit to the

Pennsylvania Air and Army
National Guard in Harrisburg and

Fort Indiantown Gap, concluding

with a visit to Army Guard units

in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In

November, at the request of the

Governor of the Virgin Islands,

Foreign Liaison office personnel

escorted 21 Attaches participating in the final Columbus 500

Year events and ceremonies.

In the late spring, the Foreign

Liaison section joined the Army

Foreign Liaison Office to lead 43

attaches on tour of the National

Training Center at Fort Irwin,

California, and to Alaska for

visits to Fort Wainwright, Fort

Richardson and the Alaska

National Guard in Anchorage,

St. Lawrence Island and Nome.

Throughout the year, continued international interest in the

National Guard yielded 96 visit

requests to Army National Guard

units in the states and approximately 33 overview briefings conducted at the National Guard

Bureau, including several to Chief

of Staff or Deputy Minister of

Defense-level visitors. The

Foreign Liaison section also

worked closely with the Office of

International Initiatives to support several significant Joint

Military-to-Military Program visits, notably with Lithuania,

Albania and Belarus.

The Air Foreign Liaison section processed over 99 requests

to visit Air National Guard (ANG)

facilities in FY94. Over 30 orientation rides were provided to foreign personnel in KC-135, F-16,

and C-130 aircraft. The Spring

Air Attache trip was a combined

Guard/Air Force trip and went to

Tyndall AFB, FL; Maxwell AFB,

AL; Columbus AFB, MS and New

Orleans, LA. The USAF hosted

the fourth International Air

Reserve Symposium at San

Antonio, Texas which was

hosted by the Air National Guard

and Air Force Reserves. This

high-level symposium brought

together eight countries to

discuss the operation and organization of their countries' air

reserve forces.

Policy,

Administration

and Protocol

The Policy, Administration, and

Protocol Branch processed 255

informational and 83 policy All

States letters, and reviewed

to concurrence. This Branch consolidated and coordinated NGB

input to the Reserve Forces

Policy Board's annual report. It

attended quarterly meetings and

coordinated briefings for the

Army Reserve Forces Policy

Committee, and was responsible

for preparing NGB General

Officer leadership-for the weekly

Senior Staff Council and meetings of the Reserve Components

Coordination Council.

Coordinating with the New

York National Guard and Stewart

Air National Guard Base personnel, this branch participated in

the state funeral of former

President Richard Nixon. They

also participated at the Funeral

Operations Center. Responsibility

for Guard participation in state

funerals was transferred to

NGB-ARO after the funeral to

better align actions with functional responsibilities. The Protocol

Section conducted numerous

information and orientation briefings for a wide variety of General

Officers and civilian dignitaries,

along with countless award,

National Guard regulations, Army promotion and retirement

regulations, and Air Force regula- ceremonies.

tions for joint applicability prior

_S___
PUBLIC

AFFAIRS

The Office of Public Affairs is

divided into several functional

areas. In addition to traditional

public affairs responsibilities,

the office also manages programs

in historical services, youth

education and citizenship, and

youth fitness.

Media Relations

An unusually high number of natural disasters in FY94 kept media

attention focused on the National

Guard and intensified the level of

work in this division. Personnel

were deployed to the Los

Angeles earthquake and the

Georgia floods as part of the

National Guard Bureau's Crisis

Action Team. In addition, the

office received numerous news

media queries from around the

world regarding the National

Guard's firefighting efforts during the forest fires in the

Western United States.

The National Guard's expanding global mission in Rwanda and

Somalia and combat support missions in Iraq, Bosnia and Haiti

focused extraordinary public and

media attention on the Guard.

4
In addition, a policy change

allowed freer discussion about

the Guard's international partnership programs and its

counterdrug mission.

Environmental

Programs

The Environmental Programs

Division is responsible for all

community involvement and public participation activities associated with NGB environmental

programs. Working in concert

with technical program managers

in the Army and Air Directories,

state public affairs officers,

installation environmental managers, and division personnel provide public affairs advice and

guidance relating to an array of

environmental legislation.

In FY94, the division supported 183 community-based environmental actions by assessing and

analyzing project needs and initiating local action. Our activities

included the development of several full-color portable displays

and brochures, educational video- On a national basis, the divi- brochures on airspace issues,

tape programs, display newspa- sion published a revised public a video on natural resources,

per advertisements, community affairs guidance manual on envi a full-color brochure on the

relations plans, public and con- ronmental programs, produced National Environental Policy

gressional briefings, and public two educational videos with Act, and a distinctive ntural

meeting planning and execution. accompanying full-color resources poster.
The division's Environmental 22-week residential programs per nology related fields. The

Communication classes were year. The class size for this coed- program curriculum includes

again in high demand. Eighteen ucational program varies by state, subjects such as physics, serobasic-level courses were conduct- ranging from 100 to 400 students space education, hands-on

ed, with one advanced course and per class. Seventy-three per cent computer exercises and

two refresher classes offered.

Policy and Plans

During FY94, the National

Guard's ChalleNGe program

expanded from 10 to 15 states.

The program is designed to

enable high school dropouts

between 16 and 18 years of age 6

to attain a General Educational

Development (GED) diploma,

develop life and job skills, and

take part in community service

projects, The 22-week residential program, based on a core

component intervention model,

addresses the following eight

core components: life coping

skills; educational excellence

(GED); job skills training;

responsible citizenship; positive

leadership-followership; health,

hygiene and sex education;

physical education; and community service projects.

Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas,

Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois,

Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi,

New Jersey, New York North

Carolina, Oklahoma, Virginia and

West Virginia each conduct two,

of the students enrolling in the environmental science.

program complete the residential

phase and 75 per cent of those In a "spin-off" of STARBASE,

complete the GED in residence. Public Affairs personnel eatabAn additional 7 percent complete lished the first FBI/National

their GED during the post-resi- Guard STARBASE Academy at

dential portion of the program. Qoantico, VA, in June 1904. This

joint-partnership between the

The National Guard STAR- Federal Bureau of Investigation,

BASE (Science and Technology the National Guard, the U.S.

Academies Reinforcing Basic Marine Corps and private sector

Aviation and Space Exploration) sponsors allowed thirty children

expanded from seven to thirteen from seven STARBASE states to

states in FY94. This innovative participate in the week-long proapproach to science and math gram. Program participants

education for our nation's youth received instruction in state-of

is proving to be a success in cap- the-art law enforcement tecbnolturing the attention of educators ogy to include finger printing,

and local communities across the acoustica and facial aging technation. STARBASE is a five-day niques. Planning is underway for

science and math enrichment the 1905 Academy this spring.

course conducted at National

Guard installations in California,

Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Community Relations

Minnesota, North Carolina,

Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, The Community Relations

Texas, Vermont and Wyoming. Division assists the 54 states and

The program focus is to stimu- territories in panning, developlate the 'at risk" child's interest ing, executing and evaluating

in math and science in order to national-level community reinattract these children to further tons and domestic action prostudy or to pursue possible grams in an effort to gamer

careers in math, science or tech- widespread community understanding, acceptance and support
N A T I 0 N A L

for the programs and activities of

the National Guard. In FY94, the

NGB community relations team

coordinated DOD-sponsored

Armed Forced Day and Veteran's

Day activities at 36 regional sites.

NGB support included planning

for a conducting a broad program

of events. The division also coordinated dozens of overseas band

tours to Central and South

America, the Caribbean, Europe,

and the Pacific, including several

deployments which helped commemorate the National Guard's

role in World War II. Community

Relations personnel also coordinated 11 overseas civic/leader

media representative visits to

observe National Guard activities

in Europe, the Middle East, the

Caribbean and Canada.

FY94 was the third year that

the Community Relations

Division conducted National

Guard youth physical fitness clinics in several states. Legislation

is pending to broaden the types

of support which the Guard may

provide to nationally-recognized

youth organizations.

Historical Services

In response to the large number

of reorganizations necessitated

by the drawdown, historical services personnel spent a great

deal of time tin FY94 advising

both NGB and the states, in

order to retain historic units in

the force structure. Historical

Services personnel were also

lead planners in organizing the

Army National Guard's participation in the 50th anniversary of

the Normandy landings, the

largest and best-publicized of all

World War II 50th anniversary

events. A total of 80 Virginia and

Maryland troops from the 29th

Infantry Division (Light), 22

members of Nebraska's 134th

Infantry, and the 229th Army

Band from Maryland were

deployed to France to take part

in dozens of commemorative

ceremonies throughout the

Normandy region.

Air National Guard historians

produced several publications in

FY94, including a history of the

Air Guard, a study of the Air

Guard's Gulf War mobilization, a

chronology of Air Guard operations in support of relief efforts

in Somalia and Rwanda, and several brief articles on various subjects. The Air Guard's senior

enlisted historian taught a block

of instruction for Air Force field

historians at Maxwell AFB,

Alabama, the first member of the

Air National Guard to do so.

INSPECTOR

GENERAL

The National Guard Bureau

Inspector General Program is a

joint program and a primary element in the system of internal

controls monitoring the outflow

of approximately $10.5 billion

annually in federal resources to

the Army National Guard and

Air National Guard. The program

provides the chief of the National

Guard Bureau with an ongoing

assessment of the economy, efficiency, discipline, morale, espirit

de corps and readiness of the

National Guard through an

aggressive agenda.of assistance,

investigations and inspections.

The program manages approximately 225 inspector general soldiers and airmen with an annual

operating budget in excess of

$10 million. The National Guard

Bureau Inspector General is on

the personal staff of, and reports

directly to, the chief of the

National Guard Bureau and, in

his absence, to the vice chief of

the National Guard Bureau. Both

Army National Guard and Air

National Guard issues are serviced by inspectors general.

The Office of the Inspector

General also has oversight

responsibility for the 50 active

duty inspectors general in the

7

G U A R D B U R E9 A U
r ,-

V

it
N A T I 0 N A L

United States and Territories.

The states and territories voluntarily participate in the Inspector

General Program.

The Office of the National

Guard Bureau Inspector General

in FY94 consisted of four divisions: Policy, Program and

Evaluation, Army Assistance and

Investigation, Air Complaints and

Inquiries, and Inspections and

Analysis.

Policy, Program and

Evaluation Division

The Policy, Program and

Evaluation Division has the mission of evaluating and reporting

on the effectiveness of the

National Guard Inspector

General Program in the various

states and territories of America.

It is responsible for monitoring

the effectiveness of IG functions

within the National Guard; planning, programming and budgeting

for IG activities; managing information management resources;

developing internal policies and

procedures pertaining to the utilization of IGs within the National

Guard; and training IGs regarding National Guard operational

procedures. Eleven new IGs were

assimilated into the program

during FY94.

Army Assistance and

Investigation Division

The Army A&I Division processes requests for assistance that

involve Army Guard issues.

Requests for assistance that can

be resolved at the State level are

forwarded to the appropriate

state IG for resolution. The

Division receives complaints from

the Department of Defense Hot

Line, Department of the Army

Inspector General, State Inspectors General and individuals.

NGB investigations, under a

directive from the chief of the

National Guard Bureau, are conducted by teams of inspectors

general made up of at least one

officer and one senior NCO. All

general officer cases are investigated by the Department of the

Army Inspector General Office.

Army inspector general results

are not used for adverse actions

unless the evidence is so compelling as to make any additional

investigative work pointless.

All reports of investigation are

reviewed for legal sufficiency.

Historically, the types of cases

handled by the IG system have

changed very little over time.

Assistance cases involving

finance and accounting, personnel

management command/manage-.

ment of the organization and personnel conduct have been and

continue to be the four leading

types of cases handled by the IG

system. In FY94, the National

Guard Inspector General system

handled over 10,000 cases. A

large majority of these cases

were requests for assistance that

did not involve any violations of

law or regulations.

Air Complaints

and Inquiries

Due to differences in Air

National Guard unit structure,

inspector general equivalent

assistance to airmen is usually

available at the base level. Thus,

at the National Guard Bureau the

primary mission of the Air

Complaints and Inquiries Division

is to serve as a confidential fact

finder on sensitive issues involving fraud, waste and abuse, abuse

of authority, and reprisal and personnel issues. The Division

receives complaints from the

Department of Defense Hot Line,

Air Force inspector general officer, Air Force Hot Line, state inspectors general and individuals.

Most cases involving lieutenant colonels and below are

forwarded to the State Inspectors General for resolution.

G U A R D B U R E A U
q

A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

Unlike the Army A&I Division,

this division has the responsibility

to investigate allegations against

senior officers (colonel selectees

through general officers).

Additionally, the findings may be

used for adverse action against

airmen. All reports of inquiry are

put through an extensive legal

review process which insures

that airmen's rights are protected and that the standards of

proof on each finding are

properly met.

Inspections and

Analysis Division

The Inspections Division has

the primary mission of conducting National Guard special

inspections and assessments and

analysis of joint, systemic issues.

The Division also oversees

National Guard intelligence functions and activities, coordinates

DAIG inspection activities with

the states. It reviews internal

control programs and analyzes

the economy, efficiency, discipline, morale, and readiness of

the National Guard through

numerous data sources. In FY94,

the Inspections and Analysis

Division conducted special

inspections and assessments of

patient administration and health

care for National Guard Desert

Shield/Storm veterans, and Army

National Guard training and

equipment repair sites.

JUDGE

ADVOCATE

During FY94 the number of

branches within the Office of

Judge Advocate increased to

include a training branch. The

other nine branches are: general

and administrative law, litigation,

contract law/contract fraud advisor, labor and personnel law,

ethics and standards of conduct

international law, environmental

law, legislation and counterdrug

support.

The Office of Judge Advocate

has a full time staff of 20 attorneys, which reflects an increase

of 5 since 1992. The attorneys

are made up of Army and Air

Judge Advocates, and is supported by detachments of the D.C.

National Guard.

General and

Administrative Law

During FY94, the General

Administrative Law Branch rendered hundreds of written legal

opinions on a variety of complex

matters, including some of first

impression.

Areas of concern included support for private organizations,

reemployment rights, promotions, retired pay, retired grade,

separation pay, sanctuary, and

retention of officers in active status past age 60. The branch also

reviewed numerous draft regulations, board actions of various

kinds, military discrimination

complaints, and prepared

answers to congressional and

other high level inquiries about

actions and activities of the

National Guard.

Litigation

In FY94, the Litigation Branch

continued to assist the judge

advocates general of the Army

and Air Force in supporting the

Department of Justice attorneys

representing the National Guard

and its personnel. The Litigation

Branch became increasingly

involved in the litigation process

to ensure that National Guard

interests are adequately represented. NGB-JA coordinated contact between U.S. attorneys, the

litigation divisions, and state

National Guard commands and
N A T I 0 N A L.

handled cases involving personal

injury, military and civilian personnel challenges, and a variety

of other issues.

Labor and

Personnel Law

In FY94, the Labor and Federal

Personnel Law Section provided

legal advice and reviewed numerous equal employment opportunity, civilian personnel, and labor

proceedings and cases. The

Section reviewed all EEO settlement agreements, offers of full

relief, and final agency decisions

for NGB involving civilian technicians. This section also provided

legal support to NGB-HRL in the

areas of labor management relations and civilian technicians.

NGB-JAP provides legal advice to

NGB-ADI in support of the

National Guard Bureau's

Freedom of Information Act and

privacy act programs.

Ethics and Standards

of Conduct

The Ethics and Standards of

Conduct Advisor continues to

work within the NGB to provide

advice and assistance to the AGR

judge advocates across the country. During FY94 the Ethics and

Standards of Conduct Section

insured that all required financial

disclosure reports were filed

nationwide, reviewed hundreds of

reports for conflicts of interest,

and made detailed reports to the

Army and Air Force. The Ethics

and Standards of Conduct

Advisor conducted numerous

training sessions and provided

written legal opinions on such

topics as political activities of

government and military personnel, post government employment restrictions, membership in

private organizations, honoraria,

and gratuities.

Legislation

The Legislation Branch drafted

legislation, together with necessary analysis and justification, to

resolve a number of legal issues

and improve or expand authority

II

G U A R D B U R E A U
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

for National Guard programs and The support for the advocate generals' schools in

activities. Among these were leg- Counterdrug Support Mssion developing a National Guard-apeislation concerning the counter- takes the form of opinions and cic Domestic Operations Law

drug program, youth support pro- interpretations of the fiscal, crim- (DOPLAW) training program for

grams, emergency response inal, administrative and constitu National Guard lawyers.

training, environmental pro- lions] issues involved with exegrams, and active component cuting the 54 state governors'

responsibilities. The Branch mon- plans which implement the con- International

itored over 180 bills in Congress, gressional mandate to utilize the

numerous internal DOD legisla- assets and personnel of the Before 1994, International Law

tive proposals, and prepared and National Guard in the War on Branch duties were shared by

presented NGB positions and Drugs. It also involves teaching several attorneys in the Office of

concerns on a number of these drug demand reduction, thermal the judge Advocate. An increase

proposals. The legislation branch imaging operation, and a wide in overseas deployments and a

worked with state governments variety of cornterdrug misted new emphasis on operational law

to facilitate interstate compacts training courses. required the assignment of a full

for mutual assistance in disaster, time, dedicated attorey in FY94.

emergency response, drug inter- Coincidentally, recent comments

diction and counterdrug activi- y the secretary of defense indities. The branch also assisted cate an ever increasing use of

in resolving the issue of alloca- The Training Branch is new to Guard personnel overseas for a

tion of command and control this office. Its mission is to coor- variety of missions, such as

authority over reserve forces dinate and failitate the training peacekeeping and humanitarian

within the DOD. and career devsiopment of the assistance. The International Law

National Guard judge Advocate Branch became the NGB JA

General Corps Officers Support coordinator in 1994 for militaryCounterdrug Personnel in their pntaptso federal and tn-military Thrnugh this

state functions. The Branch is European Command-sponsored

The Counterrirug Support already underway in conducting a program, National Guard attorMission involves dealing with a

wide variety of issues from the

NGB Counterdrug Task Force,

the liaisons to the various federal

agencies the NGB supports

(e.g. DEA, FBI, DOJ, and USCS)

and the Counterdrug Coordinators located in the 54 states

and territories.

thorough and comprehensive neys from several partnership

review of all National Guard JA states have deployed to the newly

and enlisted training opportuni- independent States of the former

ties that are available through the Soviet Union and the former East

other services to augment and Bloc to assist theae emerging

enhance existing programs. The democracies with legal education

Training Branch is also coordi- and training.

nating through the active componeat Army and Air Force judge

-1-2-
N A T I O N A L G U A R B U R E A U

Contract Law

In FY94, 492 commercial instruments (solicitation, contracts and

modifications, etc.) were

reviewed for legal sufficiency.

This represents an increase of 80

documents over the previous

year. In FY94, the Uniform

Cooperatives Agreement was

implemented. The United States

Property and Fiscal Officers

(USPFO's) now have a tool which

significantly contributes to efficient management of the program. While the process is simplified; it increases the control

over the funds by the USPFO.

Members of this section participated in the fiscal law course

and provided assistance for a

DOD course on cooperative

agreements. This course will be

presented at Ft. Lee, VA in

January, 1995. It will be a mandatory course for all DOD grants

and cooperative agreement officers. In addition, this office is

preparing an additional 3-day

course in the area of cooperative

agreements. This course will be

provided to all USPFO's and all

personnel, state and federal,

involved in the National Guard

Cooperative Agreement

Program.

Environmental Law

The National Guard continues to

strive for environmental excellence and works hand-in-hand

with state and federal regulators

to resolve environmental issues.

During FY94, the Environmental

Law Branch continued its efforts

to facilitate Air Guard and Army

Guard compliance with land use

requirements and state and federal environmental statutes. The

Environmental Branch provides

counsel on the full range of environmental laws designed to regulate the use and disposal of hazardous substances and to dininish National Guard impacts on air

and water resources. In addition,

much was accomplished in FY94

by direct negotiation with regulators. Face-to-face meetings and

discussions with the U.S. EPA

and various state agencies have

proven extremely effective in

clarifying the Guard's commitment to environmental protection. FY94 saw the beginning of

the "Pollution Prevention" ethic

within the Guard. Through written guidance and briefings to

bureau components, the

Environmental Branch made

great strides to help incorporate

Pollution Prevention in the dayto-day operations of Guard support and operations units.

INTERNAL

REVIEW

AND AUDIT

COMPLIANCE

The Office of Internal Review

and Audit Compliance provides

the National Guard Bureau leadership with in-house professional

oversight capability. The full mission of the office is:

* to provide senior National

Guard leaders with professional in-house audits which are

responsive to their needs, are

problem oriented, and which

stimulate immediate corrective

actions.

* to provide guidance, assistance, direction, and training

for state territory internal

review elements.

* to provide coordination and

liaison with external audit

agencies conducting business

with the National Guard.

Although the office is authorized 15 positions, FY94 manning

consisted of 4 professional auditors, one tour officer, and a civilian secretary. With down-sizing

initiatives impacting the NGB

during FY94, the ability to fill

auditor spaces was not available.

13
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E

0 V W

Al _

I ~ - -

A -~ -0w. - - -

Internal Review

Operations

The Operations Branch is

responsible for conducting audits

and other internal review services for senior NGB officials. As

with all internal review activities,

it supplements the audit coverage

provided by the centralized audit

organizations in the Army and

Air Force.

Subjects for audit are submitted annually by the directors and

their staffs, as well as by the

adjutants general and US property and fiscal officers. These recommendations are prioritized

based on factors such as budget,

risk, history, and number of auditor days available. This list is

then briefed to NGB general officers for changes, additions, and

deletions. Once the chief of the

NGB approves the list, it is formalized and published as the

NGB Annual Internal Review

Schedule. The published schedule

is evaluated several times during

the year to ensure that it continues to meet the needs of Guard

leadership. In keeping with the

vision statement, this Branch is

also on-call to provide quick reaction or "troubleshooting" reviews

to senior NGB officials.

During FY94, the following

audit projects were undertaken:

Texas National Guard (in support of the DAIG)

Self-Sufficiency Exemption

Program

NGB Contingency Fund

Program

C H I E F
N A T I 0 N A L G U A R D B U R E A U

In addition, the Operations Accompanying the NOB review Audit Compliance

Branch performed some audit team are senior auditors from and Liaison Officer

work in order to provide the other states. The augmentation

Assistant Secretary of the Army enables the NOB to spend less The NOB audit compliance and

for Financial Management with time on-site and fscilitates the liaison officer serves as the Chief,

information concerning the spread of good ideas and new the NGB'a central point of conManagement Controls Program techniques. tact with all external audit orgawithin the Army National Guard. nizations. He facilitates agencies

During FY94, sixteen Quality audit efforts by ensuring they are

Assurance reviews were conduct- in contact with the proper funcState Programs ed. The states of Ohio, South tional official, arranging briefings

andDakota, and Maine were formally and conferences, notifying and raiingrecognized for their outstanding staten/territories and NOB activiState Programs and Training internal review prugrams. ties of pending audits, and

Branch is responsible for provid- staffing replies to audit findings

ing state and territory internal The State Programs and and recommendations. Counting

review offices with guidance, Training Branch also manages all agencies, there are normally

assistance, training and oversight. the National Guard Auditor over one hundred audita on-going

Training Program. The NO within the National Guard at any

In accordance with Auditor Training Program one time.

Department of Defense policy, consists of several courses of

the Branch conducts external instruction which meet federal

quality controls reviews (quality auditor training requirements

assurance) of local internal established by the President's HUMAN

review offices. These reviews Council on Integrity and RESOURCES

serve to ensure that state adju- Efficiency. These courses present

tants general and US property curriculum subjects in the unique The White House' "reinventing

and fiscal officers receive profes- environment of the National goverment" was a major initiasional quality internal review ser- Guard. In addition to these coure- tive in FY94. It impacted

vices. Under this program, each en, the Branch coordinaten and required full time positions and

state/territory is reviewed by a administers courses offered or resulted in technicians leaving via

team of professional auditors sponsored by the auditor general voluntary early retirement to

once every three years. The of the Army and the Graduate save the jobs of others. Some

Quality Assurance Program eval- school of the US Department employees received a separation

uates work accomplished at the of Agriculture. incentive of up to $25,000.

local level and compares it to The reinvention process

comptroller general and

Department of Defense audit emaire deleate authority enableser the maketperenune

timenonsite annfaciliateseth
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H H

decisions, and in many cases

changes the role of personnel

specialists to that of advisor to

management rather than decision

maker. Deregulation is emphasized with the goal of reducing

regulations by 50%. Other objectives are to reduce the number

of supervisors to workers, reduce

management control positions

such as budget, manpower personnel, inspector general and

internal review.

During this fiscal year, equal

opportunity was removed from

HR and created as a separate

office reporting directly to the

assistant chief of the NGB.

Labor Relations

The expanded scope of bargaining included in Executive Order

12871 cost the National Guard

one argument: that it constitutes

a method or means of performing

work to keep military technicians

in the military uniform. It did not,

however, change the position of

the organization that the requirement to wear the uniform is

essential to operations and implements a mandate of the

Technicians Act. While the

Directorate of Human Resources

also continues to assert that it

constitutes an internal security

practice, a decision of the U.S.

Circuit Court of Appeals for the

District of Columbia Circuit renders that approach less tenable.

The States began dealing with

the issue of providing, or paying

an allowance to purchase and

maintain, the uniform to military

technicians. When a State and a

union have been unable to reach

agreement, the Federal Services

Impasses Panel has so far found

that the technicians should

receive the upper limit ($400

per year). When the parties

have been able to agree, the

amount has generally been considerably less.

Just under 20 states have inaugurated partnerships with their

labor organizations, and several

others have begun the process of

doing so.

Information and

Systems Management

The Information and Systems

Management Division continued

to strive toward a comprehensive

human resources system. In continuing this effort, paramount to

the mission was the consideration

focused on service and support to

the customer.

We continued conversions to

the Defense Civilian Pay System

(DCPS). A total of 24 Air Guard

and 16 Army Guard pay sites/

offices were migrated to the new

system with an additional 51

scheduled for the next fiscal year.

In addition, the Automated

Compatibility Program Initiative

is ongoing. Complete fielding of

the program is planned for the

4th quarter of FY95, with the

ANG having been completed

in FY94.

We hosted four training seminars for human resources management staff members on the

Defense Civilian Personnel Data

System (DCPDS). This training

was provided to one hundred and

sixty two National Guard employees who utilize this system in the

completion of their respective

duties. In addition, introductory

Direct English Statement

Information Retrieval System

(DESIRES) training was conducted for the personnel systems

managers (PSMs).

The Integrated Systems

Branch continued the consolidation effort with the U.S. Air

Force Regionalizing Initiative.

During this fiscal year, thirty

states were transitioned to the

regional data processing centers

bringing the total to forty three

C H I E F
V 4

V

I'

(

4

J I

A) I

'II' /

0<'~

~. (I I

I

1'.

79

'-Ia,. ~Ia~~'-.M I ~ .C.,Y ~{&ku ,

.'VtWr.;ttr *,.~ 'A' ~-A! *- tIAtil QWtW'%Vh '~.I ~

'*U 14 - ..

A4M5
ANNUAL R EVIE W OF THE CHIEF

(80%). Completion of this initiative is expected in FY95 with the

exception of one state.

Staffing Program

More than 30% of the states

experienced personnel reductions

in FY94. Personnel losses were

due to aircraft conversions,

reduction of aircraft, loss of flying hours, budget deficits, and

force structure changes. To minimize adverse impact on the current work force, the Directorate

for Humane Resources continued

its emphasis on voluntary separations through pay incentives for

early retirement, voluntary resignations, and voluntary retirement. Nine states used the voluntary separation incentive pay program to buy out 88 employees.

Delegation of

Classification

Authority

In FY94, the NGB began a pilot

program to delegate classification

authority to managers.

Delegating classification

authority (DCA) to managers

shifts the classifications of local

positions from the Human

Resources Management Office

(HRMO) to managers. The goal

of this program is to make classification more meaningful to managers and employees. It also

strengthens the team concept of

classifiers and managers, providing a more realistic environment

for the classification process.

Classification specialists play a

different role under this concept

by providing technical expertise,

coaching, advice and oversight to

managers.

For the pilot program, the

authority to classify positions is

delegated to the adjutant general,

deputy adjutant general, chief of

staff, air commander, USP&FO,

and those supervisors who report

directly to one of these managers

and are second level supervisors.

Eleven states volunteered to participate in the pilot program. A

training course was given to

managers to provide them with

the necessary tools to start on

the path to utilizing their new

authority. Progress reports will

be submitted quarterly by the

states beginning in November

1994. A newsletter titled DCA

Today will provide all states with

information regarding the

progress of the pilot program.

Technician Training

Program

On March 30, 1994, the president

of the United States signed into

law H.R. 3345, the Federal

Workforce Restructuring Act

(Public Law 103-226). The act

included amendments to the

Government Employees Training

Act (GETA) to remove some

restrictions on employee training,

which will provide our managers

greater flexibility in accomplishing civilian training, education

and professional development.

Under the new law, which can

be implemented immediately,

agencies can fund training in support of its missions and performance goals and is no longer limited by a workers' official duties.

By broadening the purpose of

training and targeting it to

strategic business plans, it can be

a management tool that is more

responsive to the current and

future needs of states through

leadership development, retraining, cross-training, continuing

professional education and technical training.

The new law also allows agencies to make use of available

training services without regard

to source, government or nongovernment.
N A T I 0 N A L

Family Programs

During FY94, the Office of

Family Programs worked closely

with family member volunteers

to provide expanded training, improved communications, stronger

family advocacy and wider command support. Through statelevel family program workshops,

as well as the annual National

Family Program Workshop, more

than 7,000 family support volunteers have received training. The

benefits of such training accrue

to Guard families in terms of

family readiness and

Guardmember retention for both

the Army National Guard and the

Air National Guard.

Presently, all states and territories have a state family program coordinator with family

support programs in effect at

this time.

EQUAL

OPPORTUNITY

Equal opportunity is a major priority in the National Guard. In

fact, readiness and equal opportunity are the top two goals of the

National Guard for the 90's. The

equal opportunity goal is to

Guarantee each man and woman,

military and civilian, equal opportunity for entry and advancement

in the National Guard in an environment free from discrimination, bias, and sexual harassment.

During FY94, following the

Department of Defense model

for equal opportunity organization, the NGB equal opportunity

office was elevated to be a separate NGB joint staff directorate.

The new directorate is the focal

point for all equal opportunity,

civil rights, and human relations

programs and issues in the

National Guard, both military and

civilian, Army and Air. The directorate worked closely with the

high level DOD Task Force on

Discrimination and Sexual

Harassment in a detailed review

of military EO and complaints

processing and other DOD level

EO working groups and task

forces to help influence department-wide policies and programs.

Also during FY94, the NGBleadership continued to advocate

strong leadership support of

equal opportunity and diversity in

the National Guard.

Because of the Guard's close

ties to the community, it closely

reflects the cultural values and

norms of the communities that it

serves and from which its people

are drawn. Over the past 30

years the Guard has evolved from

an era of racial segregation and

exclusion to an era of enlightened

leadership, valuing diversity and

commitment to make the

National Guard a leader in Equal

Opportunity. It is the stated goal

that the National Guard should

look like America - should

reflect the racial and ethnic

diversity of the community and

the state that it serves. The NGB

has assumed an active leadership

stand to emphasize progress

toward achieving diversity

throughout the ranks.

Today, the National Guard mirrors America more than ever.

The Army Guard has 25% minorities and the Air Guard 16%. But

the major challenge remains the

glass ceiling - the upper third

of the enlisted structure and the

officer corps - where minorities

are present in comparatively

lower numbers (detailed statistics

are shown in the enclosed tables).

The NGB is working with the

assistance of state and national

level equal opportunity councils

to focus leadership energy on

identifying, developing, and mentoring minority leaders for today

and tomorrow.

G U A R D B U R E A U

1.
A N NU AL R E viE W OF THE C H I EF

Women represent 7.7% of the

Army Guard and 14.5% of the Air

Guard. The opening of combat

aircraft positions to women has

greatly increased career opportunities for women in the Air

National Guard, as women can

now serve in over 96% of Air

Guard positions. In the Army

Guard, the ground combat assignment restrictions and the large

percentage of ARNG combat

units, presents a special set of

challenges to the fullest utilization of women. However, 52% of

ARNG positions are now open to

women, and the ARNG leadership is encouraging maximum

opportunities for women in nontraditional career fields.

A critical element in the equal

opportunity equation is the prevention and eradication of sexual

harassment. The National Guard

motto is, "It's wrong. It won't be

tolerated. It's as simple as that?'

NGB policy requires training for

all Guard members and zero tolerance of sexual harassment

throughout the ranks.

Consistent with continuing

national trends, the National

Guard has continued to experience increases in discriniination

complaints filed at the NGB level.

In response, alternative dispute

resolution, primarily mediation, is

being strongly fostered by the

NGB and successfully used

through the states to facilitate

positive, low-level, resolution.

Equal opportunity is recognized in the National Guard as

primarily a leadership issue. It

must be actively pursued by the

National Guard Bureau leaders

rim

at the national level and by the

adjutants general and key commanders of every state if the

National Guard is to meet the

readiness mission with the chang

ing demographics of the next

century. The NGB is totally

committed to that end.

ii 1- ~

If r

s0
N A T I 0 N A L

COUNTERDRUG

TASK FORCE

For many years the National

Guard has provided counterdrug

support to law enforcement entities. This year the National

Guard Bureau Counterdrug Task

Force was also given responsibility for the National Guard

Internal Control and Education

Program and Drug Demand

Reduction activities.

Drug Demand

Reduction

In FY94, all 54 states and territories effectively formulated drug

demand reduction strategies, tactics, resources, and action plans

that supported 5,492 activities

nationwide. These activities are

designed to reach out to families,

schools, community coalitions,

adult supervised youth activity

groups, and a wide range of other

community partners committed

to positive and healthy alternatives to substance abuse. Almost

53,000 Guard members, family

members, and associated civilian

volunteers actively participated in

National Guard drug demand

reduction activities, which

reached a public audience of over

5,090,610. Nationally, the Drug

Demand Reduction Program is

facing the immense challenge of

encouraging positive youth development. National Guard members are serving as adult role

models, tutors, mentors and motivated advocates.

At the national level, the Drug

Demand Reduction Division continues to be involved as a task

force advisory board member

with the National Coalition for

Drug-Free School Zones

Program and the Chiefs of Police

National Drug Task Force. The

task force is coordinating and

directing efforts to broaden the

scope of drug-free school zone

laws to include issues regarding

weapons, public housing, and

other key elements. The Coalition has created a comprehensive

program that communities can

implement to strengthen local

drug-free school zones. Program

materials are targeted for use by

four groups: community leaders,

parents, the general public, and

students. Program materials can

be utilized by a wide range of

individuals involved with youth

development and substance abuse

prevention activities.

The National Guard Bureau's

Drug Demand Reduction Division

combined efforts with the Center

for Substance Abuse Prevention,

"Join together," Partnership for a

Drug-Free America, and the

Newspaper Association of

America to create the

Community Unit-Drug Coalitions

of America National Forum

Conference in Washington, D.C.

Over 800 coalition leaders from

throughout the United States

attended the conference. The

forum offered more than 40

practical hands-on workshops

conducted by coalition leaders

from around the nation.

During FY94, the NGB drug

demand reduction liaison officer

at the Headquarters of the Drug

Enforcement Administration,

(DEA), Washington, D.C. helped

foster coordination between the

two agencies in drug demand

reduction initiatives and coordinating the development and

growth of DDR programs to

ensure maximum economy and

effectiveness.

The National Guard Bureau

Drug Demand Reduction Division

worked in partnership with the

DEA and DIR marketing company to develop an action plan to

prevent high school student athletes from using alcohol and

other drugs. The program that

resulted from this new partnership - The National Guard/DEA

Sports and Drugs Awareness

Program - was implemented in

a

G U A R D B U R E A U
A N N U A L R E V IE W F T H E C H IEF

early FY94 to high school coaches and athletes across the country. A unique marketing program

was created to generate awareness of the program.

Youth Programs

The National Defense Authorization Act for FY93 required the

secretary of defense to conduct a

pilot outreach program to reduce

the demand for illegal drugs. The

program was established to focus

on youth in general and innercity disadvantaged youth in particular. The four National Guard

programs for inclusion in the

pilot program are:

* The New York Cadet Corps, a

preventive program that creates opportunity for inner city

youth, ages 12-17, to participate

in a program designed to provide structure, leadership

skills, and to foster a sense of

belonging as a means of reducing juvenile drug use and criminal activity.

* The Kansas Parents

Network/Training, a collaborative program based on the

public health system, involving

the Kansas National Guard,

Kansas Board of Education,

and Kansas Alcohol and Drug

Abuse Service. This program

ensures that communities are

offered a range of support services for families such as education that equips parents with

parenting skills, particularly in

areas of support-giving, control, and values formation.

Prevention programming in

multiple areas of risk including

alcohol, illicit drugs, suicide

and depression were also

taught.

The Illinois First Choice, a

preventive National Guard and

local community program

which serves as a communitybased fitness program to counteract substance abuse, drop

out rates, and gang influences

for inner city and at-risk

youth. Parents and youth participate together in fitness

training and events.

The Oregon Mentors

Program, targeting youth 6-14

years of age. Activities are

scheduled throughout the

school year for mentors and

children. This program also

includes summer activities that

are sponsored by the Oregon

National Guard and several

community organizations.

Supply Reduction

During FY94, the National Guard

conducted 6,709 operations and

provided over 12 million mandays/workdays in support of local,

state, and federal law enforcement agencies responsible for

counterdrug activities. This support is provided over and above

normal training requirements by

individual National Guard members. The number of

mandays/workdays was down

over 130,000 from FY93 due to

significant FY94 funding reductions levied on the National

Guard Counterdrug Support

Program.

While not considered to be

a measure of effectiveness,

National Guard assisted seizures

have increased dramatically over

the years. These seizures and

associated arrests are tracked by

the states as reported by the supported agencies and are ultimately posted to the National Guard

Bureau database. These figures

strongly suggest that the flow of

illicit drugs can be interrupted

when adequate resources are

made available. Although funding

reductions had an adverse impact

on total manday/workday levels

in FY94, National Guard efforts

continued to increase the capabilities of drug law enforcement
N A T I 0 N A L

agencies. Assisted seizures

increased in the categories of

cash confiscated, cocaine, vehicles seized, weapons seized, and

resulting arrests while they

declined in the categories of marijuana, heroin, opium, hashish and

marijuana eradication. Assisted

seizure data for FY94 is listed

below. Estimated street value

of drugs seized is $98 billion.

CASH CONFISCATED

.......... $236,057,181.00

.MARIJUANA PLANTS

ERADICATED........... . 4,804,179

MARIJUANA,

PROCESSED POUNDS.872,056

COCAINE POUNDS ........ 265,311

HEROIN POUNDS. 2,438

OPIuM POUNDS :. .:694

HASHISH POUNDS ..... . ... 308

VEHICLES SEIZED .. 8,599

WEAPONS SEIZED .......... 19,263

AsRRESS RESULTING .96,599

The number of requests for

National Guard support continued to increase during FY94 and

demonstrates the confidence law

enforcement agencies have in the

capabilities of our National Guard

counterdrug personnel.

Under provisions of Section

112, Title 32 United States Code,

the secretary of defense is authorized to provide funds to the governors of states that submit and

receive approval of counterdrug

support plans in support of law

enforcement agencies. For FY94,

the Secretary provided more

than $169 million to Guard units

in the fifty states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the

Virgin Islands, and the District of

Columbia (hereafter referenced

as states) to provide that support.

The FY94 Defense

Appropriations Act designated $5

million for establishment of a

transcription/translation system

to support the DEA. The

National Guard Bureau was designated as the action agency for

this initiative and responded by

establishing a linguistics support

center and providing the required

linguists. Approximately 70

National Guard linguists supported this project during FY94. The

Army is in the process of procuring specialized transcription/

translation equipment which

will be delivered to the National

Guard to support this mission

during FY95 and beyond.

The Counterdrug Task

Force conducted the annual

Counterdrug Workshop in

February 1994 for counterdrug

coordinators, plans operations

military support officers, state

army aviation officers and executive staff support officers from

the states. Numerous drug LEAS

were represented, including Drug

Enforcement Administration,

Federal Bureau of Investigation,

United States Customs Service,

United States Border Patrol,

United States Coast Guard, and

numerous other federal and

local agencies.

The Counterdrug Task Force

also conducted an intensive eightweek counterdrug support plan

review for the states. The review

included analyzing, coordinating

and verifying budgets, logistics,

flying hours, and legal matters of

each governor's counterdrug support plan. Following the review,

the plans were sent to the Office

of the Secretary of Defense for

approval. In order to facilitate the

approval of state plans, the

Deputy Assistant Secretary of

Defense of Drug Enforcement

Policy and Support issued a list of

approved missions that the Guard

could perform in support in law

enforcement. Specific guidance

and limitations are detailed by

23

G U A R D B U R E A U
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

National Guard Regulations

(AR)500-2/ANGI 10-801 and

National Guard Pamphlet

(AR)500-2-ANGP 10-801

The states perform missions

that are requested by states,

local, and Federal law enforcement, that support the

President's Drug Control

Strategy, and that best meet the

state's priorities as perceived by

the Governor and the Adjutant

General. The 16 missions

approved for FY94 are listed in

Table Two.

During FY94,.24 states conducted over 1200 reconnaissance

and interdiction detachment

(RAID) aerial support missions.

Priority was to airborne scouting

and reconnaissance support for

counterdrug missions emphasizing night capabilities. The reconnaissance and interdiction

detachment aircraft is an OH58A+ helicopter modified with an

engine upgrade, a thermal

imagery system, a law enforcement compatible communication

package, and enhanced navigational equipment. The total distribution plan calls for 76 aircraft to

be located in 31 States and the

Western Army Aviation Training

Site. The final seven progranmed states are scheduled to

receive aircraft and personnel

during FY95.

The Office of Counterdrug

Review and Evaluation (NGBCDE) conducted periodic reviews

of 35 state counterdrug operations in FY94. The mission is to

evaluate management and execuation of the program at the state

level in order to prevent fraud

APPROVED COUNTERDRUG MISSIONS

MISSION #1, SURFACE RECONNAISSANCE

MISSION #2, SURFACE SURVEILLANCE

MISSION #3, SURFACE TRANSPORTATION

SUPPORT

MISSION #4. AERIAL RECONNAISSANCE

MISSION #5,:AERIAL SURVEILLANCE

MISSION #6, AERIAL TRANSPORTATION SUPPORT

MISSION #7, GROUND RADAR SUPPORT

MISSION #9, TRAINING PROGRAM

MISSION #10,AERIAL PHOTO RECONNAISSANCE

MISSION #11, COORDINATION, LIAISON,

AND MANAGEMENT

MISSION #12, GREENHOUSEIDRUG LABORATORY

DETECTION

MISSION #14, ADMIN/INFO/ADP/LOGIAND

MAINTENANCE SUPPORT

MISSION #15, ENGINEER SUPPORT

MISSION #8, CARGO INSPECTION MISSION # 16, AERIAL INTERDICTION
N A T I O N A A

and waste, and to favorably influence implementation of internal

controls. Reviews show an

upward trend in good management practices and implementation of internal controls. State

responses to issues raised by the

review and evaluation process

have resulted in significant

improvement in budget management administration and effective use of resources of all kinds.

ACQUISITION

Principal Assistant

Responsible for

Contracting (PARC)

The Principal Assistant

Responsible for Contracting

(PARC) handles contract oversight of the National Guard

Bureau's contract management

operations performed by the

United States property & fiscal

offices, Air National Guard base

contracting offices and the NGB

Contract Support Division (AQC).

During FY94, the National Guard

Bureau processed $76194 million

in contract award actions.

The PARC develops policies

and procedures to ensure compliance with DOD contracting directives and to ensure the National

Guard Bureau is committed to

economic development and

improved opportunities for small

and disadvantaged business via

the Office of Small and

Disadvantaged Business

Utilization. The Guard placed

$563 million or 73.9% of its prime

contracts with small businesses

vice a goal of 66.4%. Small business set-aside awards amounted

to 29.7%. In the area of small disadvantaged business prime contracts and 8(a) awards, the Guard

achieved 20.8% vice its goal of

5%. Additionally, the Guard

achieved 6.2% vice a goal of 3.9%

in prime contracts to womenowned small business concerns.

This overall outstanding performance reflects the Guard's continued commitment to supporting

the Department of Defense small

business program.

Acquisition

Contracting

The Acquisition Contracting

Division supports the National

Guard Bureau (National Capitol

Region) in procurement requirements and national buys for the

54 United States Property and

Fiscal Offices. Agencies supported include both National Guard

Bureau Directorates, and the

25

G U A R D B U R E A U
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F THE C

Office of the Chief as well as the support in hundreds of purchase Environmental Reserve Component Automation and delivery orders valued at

System (RCAS) Program several illion dollars. The Environmental Acquisitions

Management Office. During the Branch awarded 212 procurement

year, eleven contracting officers In all, the Branch contracted actions totaling more than $14

completed over 2,000 procure- for over $47 million during FY94. million during FY94. This was an

ment actions with obligations of increase from FY93 of 336% in

over $102 million. procurement sctions and 646 in

Supplies and Services total dollars.

Federal Informationthe Year, NGB-AQC During FY94, the Environmen Fedra Ifor aton awarded a $6.3 milon contract tal Branch awarded ten contracts Processing (FIP) for controlled humidity storage for environmental engineering

Resources for the Army National Guard, professional and technical supProcurement Follow-on efforts are projected port services for the National

The support provided by for the remaining states provided Guard Bureau. With award of

NGB-AQC continues to increase the current program is success- these contracts, the contract

in substantial ways. The complex- fl, with projected contract capacity over the next five years

ity and versatility of contracts growth estimated at $200-300 will exceed $520 million for a

being written is also increasing milion. This program is the broad range of environmental

significantly, providing better National Guard's entry into a services including environmental

quality support for the National relatively new area of contracting restoration studies and remedisGuard Bureau. called small business innovative tion design, environmental

research. assessments and impact stateSix new major automation ments, pollution prevention and

effort contracts were awarded Requirements for the new spin prevention program studies,

this fiscal year with total 5-year Army National Guard Readiness and environmental assessments

values exceeding $74 million. In Center have been coming in for aircraft conversions.

addition, a small disadvantaged regularly and contracts were

business set-aside contract is in awarded for grounds/landscape These awards marked the cul

process. The Branch is currently maintenance, mechanical systems mination of yeara of technical and

administering 12 contracts valu- maintenance, A&E designs for acquisition planning, and the

ing over $41 million. shower/locker room facinties request and subsequent approval

and the general officer executive from the Secretary of the Army

The small purchase program suite complex. Numerous other for research, development and

support for FY94 was outstand- requirements are in various acquiaition, for waiver of certain

tag. The Branch has provided stages of the acquiaition process federal acquisition regulation

and all are scheduled for award

in FY95.

C H I E F
N A T I 0 N A L

requirements. The approval

enabled these awards in amounts

exceeding the limitations.

Of significance is the fact that

the National Guard Bureau will

no longer have to rely on agencies such as the Department of

Energy and the U.S. Army Corps

of Engineers for environmental

services and the costly fees

imposed for use of their services.

Full and open competition was

utilized to award these contracts.

Two contracts were awarded to

small business concerns; the others, awarded to large businesses,

include solid small business

subcontracting requirements.

Worthy of mention is the fact

that all awards were made without formal protest or any other

form of inquiry.

COUNTERDRUG SUPPORT.

NGB-AQC assumed increased

responsibility this fiscal year as

the Air Guard Counterdrug

Directorate transferred contractual actions from the Andrews

contracting Office to AQC. A

major task, so transferred, was

the $17 million acquisition of

repairs of the WATCHMAN

Radar System. This international

contractual effort involved

extensive coordination and

cooperation between the governments of the United Eingdom

and the United States.

Other significant procurements conducted by the Branch

included the acquisition of protective body armor ($300K) for

the individual protection of counterdrug task force personnel in

nearly every state and territory,

Counterdrug Plans Software

Maintenance Support ($250K,

educational service support to

the National Interagency

Counterdrug Institute and airborne multiband radio maintenance support contracts for the

reconnaissance and interdiction

aircraft ($375K and $860K

respectively) and the acquisition

of product upgrades for the

ANG's night vision goggles used

by ANG F-16 aircrew.

Additionally, significant acquisition planning and preparation of

documents in support of the procurement of light armored vehicles (another international contractual endeavor, between the

governments of the United States

and Canada), distance learning

initiatives, and night vision goggles for ANG C-130 aircrew have

been accomplished. These acquisitions are ongoing.

The Branch suffered a 50%

decrease in manpower this year

while maintaining professional

contracting support to both

Army and Air Guard counterdrug forces.

a7

G U A R D B U R E A U
A IMY /if a LA IL

QDATEI@NAL
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

ORGANIZATION,

TRAINING, AND

READINESS

Overseas Deployment

Training (ODT)

In 1994, 22,314 Guard soldiers

trained overseas, participated in

exercises, provided missions support-to the overseas combatant

commands and United Nations

Peacekeeping forces, and provided units in support of each

so regional commander-in-chief's

strategies for nation assistance.

The totals by theater are as

follows:

The National Guard deployed

military police platoons to

Panama and Honduras to augment existing forces.

Approximately 800 soldiers were

deployed to Panama to attend

courses at the Jungle Operations

Training Center. Nearly 350

medical personnel were deployed

to the U.S. Southern Command

and U.S. Atlantic Command to

provide medical and dental care,

as well as preventative medicine

education to local populations.

Approximately 6,200 National

Guard soldiers were deployed

overseas to conduct humanitarian

and civic activities, along with

host nation missions. These activities and missions included the

construction/renovation of over

27 kilometers of road, 31 schools,

34 medical clinics, four bridges,

three culverts, 16 wells, a home

for the elderly, and the upgrade

of an airport ramp. Other accomplishments included the deployment of 3,312 soldiers to the

European retrograde of equipment programs; deployments to

train with the active Army in the

Battle Command Training

Program and Combat Training

Center exercises in U.S. Army

Europe (USAREUR); and deployments to all theaters for Joint

Chiefs of Staff (JCS) exercises

such as Fuertes Caminsos,

Fuerzas Unidas, Bright Star,

Atlantic Resolve, Tradewinds,

Ulchi Focus Lens, Keen Edge,

and Northwind. Approximately

915 National Guard soldiers were

deployed to Camp Darby, Italy

and provided maintenance support for equipment positioned in

the Army Reserve Package-2

(AR-2).

Joint Military to

Military Program

(JMMP)

The Army National Guard participated in the Joint Military to

Military Program under the ausTheater Soldiers Mandays

CENTCOM 1,843 33,499

EUCOM 8,055 163,349

PACOM 2,727 46,598

SOUTHCOM 9,689 151,197

USACOM 455 6,144

Total ODT 22,769 400,787
N A T 1 0 N A L

pices of the National Guard

State Partnership Program. The

National Guard provided traveling contact teams, seminar participants, TAG/state governor

visits to Central and Easter

European countries, and hosted

numerous familiarization tours

to the partner states here. The

Army National Guard is used as a

model of a military force subject

to civil authority.

The Army National Guard also

demonstrates, through briefing

teams and tours of military and

civilian state facilities, how military support to civil authorities

functions prior to, during and

after civil emergencies or natural

disasters. Approximately 150 soldiers were deployed overseas

under this program to countries

including Albania, Belarus,

Bulgaria, Czech Republic,

Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Poland,

Romania, Slovalda, and Slovenia.

Areas of special interest were

Guard recruiting, retention and

training, as well as access to and

mobilization of the Guard to support active Army forces during

times of need.

Unit and Individual United Kingdom and Germany.

Exchanges The Minnesota ARNG has established a formal unit exchange The Army National Guard partic- vith the Norwegian National

ipated in three company size rec- Guard. This company-sized

iprocal unit exchanges with the exchange focuses on winter

G U A R D B U R E A U
ANNUAL REV I EW OF THE C H I EP

warfare operations. Thirteen

officers from the ARNG were

exchanged with a total of 13 officers from the United Kingdom

and Germany for their two week

annual training. The Puerto

Rican ARNG participates in the

LATAM Coop exchange program

in the Caribbean basin. Each year

over 500 PRARNG soldiers are

deployed to the Dominican

Republic, Jamaica, and Barbados.

CONUS Exercises

In FY94, the Army National

Guard participated in numerous

exercises sponsored by unified

commands. CASCADE PEAK,

held at Ft. Lewis, Washington,

was a tremendous success, with

the integration of active component I Corps units and the ARNG

"Bridge" units providing potent

warfighting capability.

ACTIVE DUTY FOR SPECIAL

WORK (ADSW).

This Army National Guard

program provides authorization

for projects such as annual medical/dental screenings, operation

of training activities/sites, unit

conversions to new weapons systems, study groups, and support

to exercises. During FY94, 1,150

ARNG soldiers participated in

ADSW projects.

KEY PERSONNEL UPDATE

PROGRAM (KPUP).

In FY94, 825 ARNG soldiers

participated in KPUP, receiving

additional training along side

their active component counterparts. KPUP participation provides enhanced proficiency training in assigned MOS duty skills at

operational and tactical levels

ranks for E5-E7, WO1-CW3s, and

0-1 through 0-4. In 1994, opportunities included ARNG soldiers in

the post mobilization environment, JCS exercises, National

Training Center, Joint Readiness

Training Center, RETROEUR,

and enhanced MOS training.

Individual Training

Fiscal Year 1994 was one of considerable challenges and changes

in the area of individual training.

The Army National Guard fully

participated in the Total Army

School System (TASS) development and implementation. As the

new fiscal year began, so did the

test and evaluation of the prototype TASS region. The primary

benefit will be a reduction of

training redundancies due to the

regionalization of training institutions. Additionally, the Training

and Doctrine Command

(TRADOC) will act as the executive agent for school accreditation; this will ensure training to

one standard.

The pilot Officer Candidate

School (OCS) program conducted

in 1993 was continued in 1994,

with all states conducting Phase I

and Phase I training at consolidated sites. This concept builds

upon the considerable resources

already dedicated to the ROTC

Advanced Camp mission and

results in standardized training at

a reduced cost. This regionalized

program shows great promise in

an era of declining resources.

FY94 was also a year of great

change for enlisted leader development. As the Army National

Guard transitions to a smaller

force, maximizing the competencies of our enlisted leaders

becomes ever more critical.

The US Army Sergeants Major

Academy updates the programs

of instruction for both the basic

and advanced noncommissioned

officer courses. Phase I of this

course is now the promotion

standard. At the same time,

the Guard initiated action to

treat military technicians in

the same manner as traditional

M-Day soldiers.
N A T I 0 N A L

This year plans were finalized

for the implementation of the

"Select, Train, Promote, and

Assign" policy for the Army

National Guard. In the future,

only soldiers on a promotion list

for current or projected vacancies will be trained. Future

Noncommissioned Officer

Education System (NCOES)

requirements will be identified

from promotion lists. This system

will establish viable priorities for

training and will ensure that

funding supports actual training

requirements.

Unit Training

FY94 continued as a year of challenges in the unit training arena.

A brigade task force of the 29th

Infantry Division, Virginia

National Guard, conducted its

first rotation through the Joint

Readiness Training Center

(JRTC) at Fort Polk, Louisiana.

This challenging exercise gave

the task force many valuable

lessons in the field of lowintensity conflict.

During 1994, the fifteen

enhanced readiness brigades

called for in the Department of

Defense Bottom Up Review were

identified. These units are spread

throughout the United States.

There are seven heavy brigades,

seven light brigades, and one

armored cavalry regiment.

Their "enhancements" included

increased training opportunities,

an authorized overstructure, and

command and control upgrades

for compatibility. These

"enhancements" are augmented

by priority resources and

increased active component

training support. The units

immediately began work with

both National Guard Bureau and

Forces Command (FORSCOM)

to develop a viable training

I..., "'{r.~m-' -. *.' .2.' iA't. '~ . -. '2 ' ... ' -.

G U A R D B U R E A U

33
A ~

4

4

_ _

N

/ Y-' ~*',, ,' I

~ 4 .~ ~-> -~

I,,

two,
N A T I 0 N A L G U A R D B U R E A U

strategy which will minimize as well as the use of simulation still contained a two week resipost mobilization training devices, including the conduct of dent phase, the Army Nationsi

requirements while maximizing fire trsiner (COFT), the Guard Guard is clearly ahesd in developuse of the inactive duty training Unit Armory Device Full-Crew ing innovative uses of the nation's

(IDT) and annual training (AT) Interceptive Simulation Trainer informstion superhighway.

periods prior to mobilization. (GUARDFIST-D, and the

All of these programs are aimed GUARDEIST-H for field artillery

at having a unit fully capable of training. GUARDFIST-I permits Training Facilities

going to war within ninety days an entire four man crew to conof mobilization. duct battle drills in an armory The Army Nstional Guard continand offers potential for increas- ues to oversee many training

The Army National Guard has ing readinees at a relatively facilities as well as the Range

also made great use of command low cost Modernization Program. One of

post exercises. Many of these the greatest concerns in this ares

exercises are conducted with GUARDFIST-l1 is a device for is the protection of the em-ayeactive component units because field artillery forward observer tems in training areas. To this

of long-standing training relations training which allows one-on-one end, the Guard is fielding the

with those units. Foremost training. Development continues Integrated Training Ares

among these is the Battle on an advanced system which will Management (ITAM) system

Command Training Program offer further economies by allow- which can assist in trackdng the

(BCTP), better known as ing a thirty to one instructor to training impact on training areas.

WARFIGHTER. Other student ratio. With the information provided by

Leavenworth exercises include system managers, the Guard can

the Brigade Command Battle The Army National Guard is work to obtain the maximum use

Staff Training (BCBST), the participating in the distance from the available land while mmCombat Division Refresher learning initiatives within the imizing damsges. ITAM developCourse (CDRC), and the Combat Department of Defense. Guard meet continued at 21 separate

Brigade Refresher Course soldiers completed the locations, with the goal of having

(CBRC). Distributed Training Advanced all primary ARNG sites under the

Non-commissioned Officer system by l999. As the Guard

Course for Armor, which was reduced maneuver damage to the

Training Aids accomplished by transmitting land, costs associated with that Traiingreconfigured course material damsge are reduced. The ARNG

The Army National Guard contin- from the Armor school via satel- also continued with the fielding of

ues to take advantage of the llte to video teletraining sites in the Range Facility Management

technology offered through simu- Montana, Idaho, Pennsylvanis, Support System (RFMSS) to prolations. This is evident through and Vermont. While this course vide automated scheduling and

training programs done in con- control of operations for training

junction with Fort Leavenworth,
A N N U AL R E V I E W F T HE C H I E F

facilities. This system will provide

detailed usage data and better

enable us to manage the land.

The goal is to field the RFMSS

at 36 ARNG locations, all of

which will be part of an armywide system permitting remote

scheduling and rapid resolution

of environmental safety issues.

Readiness

The readiness emphasis in the

Army National Guard is to provide fully mission capable units in

support of Federal missions.

Overall unit resources and training levels in the ARNG have had

minor fluctuations between the

October 1993 and October 1994

Unit Status Reports (USR). This

can be attributed to seasonal

trends and implementation of the

revised AR 220-1 incorporating

Title X mandates. The first

USR, based on the revised AR220-1, in January 1994, reflected a

minor overall degradation of 2%

both in January and again in

April. Between the April and

October USRs, overall status

remained unchanged. During this

past year, equipment on hand

declined by 1% and personnel by

6%. Personnel trends were the

result of Title XI mandates. The

new reporting policy has provided better visibility of nondeployable categories. Referring to the

October USR, there are 50,633

nondeployable soldiers, both temporary and permanent in the

ARNG.

High-Priority Units

Between the October 1993 and

October 1994 USE, overall readiness declined by 3% in the 186

ARNG Contingency Force Pool

(CFP) Support Package (SP) 1-4

units, which are the highest priority units in the ARNG. This

was due to a 2% decline in equipment and 4% decline in personnel. During this same time, however, equipment serviceability

increased by 3%.

At this same time, the 196

CFP, SP 5-7 units, which are

combat support and combat service support units that support

the Early Reinforcing Force

three and one-third divisions

have declined in overall unit status by 2%. This decline was

attributed to a 5% decrease in

personnel. There was a 2%

increase in equipment on hand

and 1% in training.

The ARNG Roundout/Roundup

Brigades increased by 8% in overall unit resources and training

levels between the October 1993

and October 1994 USR. There

was a 6% increase in equipment

on hand, 5% in equipment serviceability, and 6% in personnel.

Training declined by 2%.

Increases in equipment serviceability were also driven by

the AR change. Equipment serviceability is now based on all onhand equipment versus wartime

requirements.

The ARNG has been the

leader in making significant

progress in implementing programs to enhance the readiness

of our high priority units. Project

Standard Bearer (PSB), the

ARNG's readiness initiative to

improve and sustain high levels

of readiness for priority forces, is

now fully implemented as a management program. Each month,

the director of the ARNG presents for resolution or discussion

ARNG readiness issues and/or

problems to the Army's decision

makers to the chief of staff of the

Army's Monthly Readiness

Review. The director of ARNG

also reports quarterly to the

commanding general of the

forces command. Additionally, the

DARNG conducts a quarterly

36
N A T I 0 N A L

readiness assessment with NGB staff on-site visits, and video

Directorates and staff to identify teleconferences (VTC) with

readiness issues either for inter- major combst units and high

nal or higher headquarters reso- priority units.

lution. Other readiness improvement initiatives within NGB are

Accessibility

During 1994, the Army National

Guard was a key player as the

nation's military strategy was

tested in Somalia, Haiti, and

Southwest Asia. The Army

National Guard provided essential

operational mission support as

part of the Total Force.

SOMALIA: Army National

Guard Mobile Training Teams

(MTT) deployed to Somalia to

train coalition forces on the M60

tank and AH-15 helicopter and to

shrink-wrap U.S. aircraft for

redeployment.

HAITI: Operation UPHOLD

DEMOCRACY demonstrated the

reliance of the Army on reserve

component forces during contingency operations and operations

other than war. Although no

ARNG forces were deployed to

Haiti because of the averted invasion, the ARNG contributed significantly to CONUS operations.

For the first time since DESERT

SHIELD/STORM, presidential

selected reserve call-up authority

was used to activate three military police companies to provide

backfill units at three Army

installations that deployed to

Haiti. Although involuntary callup authority was used, HQDA

G U A R D B U R E A U

37
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H F

stipulated that the use of volunteers had to be exhausted before

soldiers were involuntary called.

The flexibility and versatility of

ARNG accessibility programs

met this challenge and all three

units of ARNG were mobilized

with volunteers. Camp Santiago,

PR, an Army National Guard

installation, was used by

FORSCOM and Special

Operations Command-Atlantic

Command 9SOCLANT) as the

training site to prepare

Caribbean coalition forces and

s-8 the multi-national peacekeeping

forces. Individual states provided

personnel and equipment in

direct support of deployment

operations to the tune of approximately 2,000 mandays. A NGB

call to the states for potential fill

of individual requirements identified by U.S. Atlantic Command

netted over 1,300 by-name nominations.

in FY95. During FY94, the battalion was constituted at Fort Bragg

and began to train. The ARNG

provided 401 of the 441 RC soldiers, representing 24 states.

Programs including the Army

National Guard's STANDARD

BEARER Program, Mobilization

Exercise Program, and Volunteer

Unit Program and FORSCOM's

Operational Readiness Evaluation

(ORE) Program have made possible an unprecedented level of

ARNG readiness and mobilization

preparedness. The STANDARD

BEARER Program continues to

enhance the readiness and mission capability of high priority

ARNG units through intensive

management and resourcing

programs.

Mobilization

Exercises

During FY94, Army Guard units

participated in more than 721

STARC-conducted mobilization

exercises. An Additional 49'units

participated in a HQDA exercise

OPTIMAL FOCUS 94, designed

to evaluate a unit's ability to conMIDDLE EAST

PEACEKEEPING: The Army's

reliance on the ARNG for operational missions gains more

momentum every year. This is

best exemplified by ARNG participation in the Multinational Force

and Observer (MFO) for the

Sinai (MFO Sinai). A three component composite battalion will

deploy for this 6-month mission

C H I E F
N A T I N A L

duct home station mobilization

tasks. Nineteen units participated

in CALL FORWARD 94, a HQDA

mobilization station exercise at

Fort Lewis, WA.

VOLUNTEER UNIT

PROGRAMS

The volunteer unit programs

enhance accessibility by identifying and preparing individuals/

units for voluntary active duty in

support of either contingency,

humanitarian, or peacekeeping

missions. The Humanitarian

Support Unit Program was used

to identify and mobilize the three

MP companies for UPHOLD

DEMOCRACY. The Operational

Integration Program is designed

to provide a tailored, multi-component force to perform forward

presence and peacekeeping missions. This program was implemented to constitute MFO Sinai.

The Operational Unit Program

maintains high priority ARNG

units prepared to enter federal

service prior to a presidential

selected reserve call-up.

OPERATIONAL READINESS

EVALUATION

The ORE Program, a FORSCOM

BOLD SHIFT initiative, was fully

implemented in FY94 after the

FY93 pilot project. The ORE provides unit commanders of all

three Army Components an

objective external evaluation of

the unit's ability to deploy and

perform its wartime mission.

To date, 251 ARNG units have

conducted an ORE with a pass

rate that compares favorably with

the active Army and the USAR.

Military Support

to Civil Authorities

More than 27,801 men and

women of the Army and Air

National Guard answered the call

to 402 emergency missions in 48

states and territories during

FY94. Over 382,596 mandays

were expended in the conduct

of these emergency response

missions. The major natural

disasters in FY94 were the

Northridge (Los Angeles)

Earthquake in January and the

Southeast flooding in Alabama,

Florida and Georgia in July. In

addition, FY94 also saw a significant amount of fire fighting support operations, primarily in the

Western United States. The Air

National Guard's C-130 Modular

Airborne Fire Fighting Systems

(MAFFS) were deployed away

from home station for a record

two month period, fighting range

and forest fires in Arizona, Idaho,

Montana, Oregon, and Washington. In Puerto Rico the Guard

used over 139,000 mandays supporting local law enforcement

agencies in combatting crime in

metropolitan areas. Other types

of missions which the Guard performed were medical evacuation,

search and rescue, emergency

power and communications, damage assessment, road/debris

clearance, security/patrolling,

ground/surface transportation,

emergency shelter, providing

potable water, and general aviation support. These domestic

support missions continue to validate the Guard's role as the first

military responder when emergencies strike in a community -

neighbors helping neighbors.

LOGISTICS

The ARNG continually seeks

new ideas and initiatives to provide the support necessary for

future contingencies. Emphasis

continues to be placed on the

first-to-fight, high priority units

and enhanced brigades. Our goal

is to provide the soldiers of the

ARNG the best equipment with

which to conduct their training

and missions.

G U A R D B U R E A U

a.
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

Logistics support was provided ARNG overcome Army procure- Emphasis continues to be

to various task forces with mis- ment fund limitations. Over the placed upon isproving the oversions throughout the world in past twelve years Congress has all readiness of our first-to-fight

1994. This was also an.active year earmarked over $3.7 billion, high priority, Project Standard

due to fighting numerous forest shove and beyond equipment Bearer smits. The Arny National

fires in the Southeast and West. shortages in ARNG units. These Guard's Logistics Directorate

purchases filled equipment short- allotted $1.2 million of secondary

ages and modernized ARNG stock fund dollars to reduce

Equipment units more quickly than under Equipment Requirements Code

the Army's regular procurement (ERC-A) shortages in all CFP-I

The ARNG has continued to take budget and equipping strategy. and CFP-I units.

advantage of the downsizing of The program has helped achieve

the active component to receive high levels of readiness and

transfer of much-needed equip- interoperability. Automation

ment, from radios to tanks. The

redistribution and fielding of the Another initiative that en- ARNG unit motor pools and

High Mobility Multipurpose hances resdiness is the Depot organizational maintenance shops

Wheeled Vehicles (BMMWVs), Level Maintenance Repair and use Unit level Logistics System

has given us an opportunity to Return Program. The $113.6 - Ground (ULLS-G) computer

purify fleet Contingency Force million FY94 program provided systems for managing unit level

Package (CFP) units and fill near- $71.9 million for overall repair repair parts and maintaining

ly half of CFP I units. and contractor logistics support maintenance records. An agreeof rotary and fixed-wing aircraft. ment was reached after the Gulf

The fielding of new Heavy The $41.7 million surface pro- War with the Army staff that DA

Equipment Transporters (HETs) gram returned inoperable, high would furnish ULLS-G to early

began during FY94. To date, only dollar, end items to the ARNG deploying ARNG uits and the

25 systems have been fielded, but inventory providing calibration ARNG would use congressionally

179 will be-fielded during FY95. support for all sperialized items added funds to purchase ULLS-G

The new HET is rated at 70 tons of equipment for which the Army for its later deploying Units. As

and can transport MIAl tanks. has no organic repair capability, of Sep. 31,1994 all ARNG TOE

Fielding of the Palletized Loading More than 8,000 pieces of equip- units have been issued ILLS-G

System (PLS) was also begun ment were returned to operation hardware and each state has a

during this fiscal year and will in- at a cost of $33 million. Two- trained support cadre in place.

crease artillery and supply units' thirds of the workload was

ability to move greater amounts accomplished at Tonele Army During FY94, the AENG conof ammunition and supplies. Depot; the remainder was re tinned to experience modemizapaired at U.S. Marine Corps logis- tin and expansion in the follow- The Dedicated Procurement tics bases under a pilot program. tag areas of tactical automation:

Program (DPP) baa helped the
:a

RON
A N N U A L RNE IEW 0 F T H E C H I EF

* Standard Property Book

System-Redesign (SPBS-R) is

a means of centralizing property book accounting and providing asset visibility to battalion and larger sized tactical

units. Ninety percent of the

ARNG authorized SPBS-R systems have been fielded in

CFP- II and m. Conversion

from the Tactical Army

Combat Service Support

Computer System (TACCS) to

NDI systems began in the 4th

quarter FY93. Conversion and

42 training for SPBS-R in ARNG

tactical units should be completed during the 2nd quarter

of FY95.

* SPBS-R I/TDA is a Multi-User

system that replaces the

Equipment Status Report

(ESR) module of the Supply

Accounting Management

Information System (SAMIS)

at the United States Property

and Fiscal Office (USPFO).

This conversion commenced

during the 2nd Quarter FY94

and should be completed during the 2nd Quarter FY95.

SPBS-R I/TDA training is

being conducted on site or at

nearby Active Army military

installations.

The ARNG is completely

revamping calibration management with the introduction and

fielding of the Test

Measurement and Diagnostic

Equipment Integrated Material

Management System (TIMMS).

TIMMS ancillary hardware, consisting of smart terminal, printer,

CD-Rom player and modem, is

being prepared for immediate

fielding. All 58 ARNG Calibration

s=Sites will receive the entire

THVIMS package. Fielding is

expected to be completed during

the 3rd quarter of FY95.

Additionally, the development

of the ULLS-Aviation (ULLS-A)

and ULLS-S4 software has begun

with anticipated fielding in mid

FY95. The ULLS-A system automates the crew chief requirements within the aviation flight

company and the maintenance

and supply operations within the

aviation maintenance activities.

The ARNG currently operates

the Standard Army Retail Supply

System - Interim (SARSS-D.

The fielding of SARSS -

Objective (SARSS-O) system

to the USPFO will begin during

the 4th Quarter of FY96 and

is scheduled to be completed

by FY98.

Other near-term goals for

ARNG logistics automation

include:

fielding of Standard

Installation/Division Personnel

System (SIDPERS) 3 on commercial NDI hardware during

FY95 and FY96, migrating of

SARSS from the Tactical

Army Combat Service Support

Computer System (TACCS)

to NDI hardware, and migration of the Standard Army

Maintenance Systems (SAMS)

from TACCS to NDI in FY95

and FY96.

. The development and fielding

of the Reserve Component

System (RCAS) for the

day-to-day functions of our

units is continuing. The fielding of RCAS to selected units

in California, Nevada, and

Arizona began in FY93.

Fielding continues on a West

to East basis, with twelve

states expected to be completed by the end of FY95.

Logistics modules will be

added to RCAS after development and testing has been

completed.
N A T I 0 N A

European Retrograde

(RETROEUR)

The ARNG began developing

RETROEUR plans in FY92 at the

request of the Vice Chief of Staff,

Army. Original plans provided

the capability to establish up

to 22 sites to receive excess

Condition Code E and F equipment from USAREU, repair it

to TM - 10/20 standards, and

redistribute it to claimants in

America's Army.

Seven sites were operational

in FY94. The sites and designated commodities of equipment for

repair are Santa Fe, NM and Ft.

Indiantown Gap, PA for repair of

tactical wheeled vehicles and

trailers; Camp Shelby, MS and

Ft. Riley, KS for repair track and

combat vehicles; Piketon, OH for

repair of tactical engineer equipment; Cp Withycombe, OR for

the repair of communications and

electronic equipment; and Blue

Grass Station, KY to receive,

identify, classify, and redistribute

excess Class II, IV, and VII (nonrolling Stock) items.

Current workload projections

(7,600) will keep the sites active

for four years. The total volume

of communications-electronics

equipment (CE and excess Class

II, IV, and 11 (NRS) has not been

verified. If the volume of equipment returning increases, the

ARNG has the capability to activate additional sites as required.

The repair sites currently

employ 370 personnel, who identify, classify, repair and redistribute items. The goal is to employ

400 personnel to reach full production capabilities during FY95.

The repair sites have received

over 7,400 major items and 725

containers of Class II, IV, and

VII items. The program not only

increases readiness through the

fielding of badly needed equipment in CONUS, but it also

improves readiness through the

enhancements to the ARNG soldier's maintenance management

skills.

Current workload projections

will keep the sites active for four

years. If the volume of equipment

returning increases, the ARNG

has the capability to activate

additional sites as required.

PERSONNEL

The FY94 end strength objective

for the Army National Guard was

to achieve a selected reserve

strength of 410,000 consisting of

46,849 commissioned and warrant officers and 363,151 enlisted

personnel. To attain this goal,

enlisted gains were programmed

at 69,710, officer gains at 4,642,

and enlisted extentions 63,686.

Enlisted losses would not be

greater than 69,822.

The fiscal year ended with

ARNG strength at 396,928 -

96.8% of the objective and

reflecting a decline of 12,991

from opening strength. Total

strength included 45,538 officers

and 351,390 enlisted personnel.

Minority strength was 99,632

- 25.1% of assigned strength.

There were 2,930 Black officers,

6.4% of officer strength and

59,613 black enlisted personnel,

17% strength of assigned enlisted

strength. Total black strength

was 62,543 -15.8% of assigned

strength, a decline of 1,836 from

FY93. This continues the decline

in this minority group from

FY88.

Female strength of 31,593 was

8.0% of assigned strength and

remained relatively constant

throughout the fiscal year.

Female strength was comprised

of 3,614 officers, 7.9% of officer

strength and 27,979 enlisted, 8.0%

of enlisted strength.

43

G U A R D El U nR E A U
A N N U A L R E v IE W O F T H E C H IE F

Enlisted Personnel

Enlisted accessions of 61,268

were 12% below the programmed

objective at 88%. A higher-thanprogrammed end strength during

the first and second quarters

necessitated the implementation

of tighter accessions criteria:

* Prior service soldiers required

to be duty MOS-qualified.

* No consideration of age and

service waivers.

* No consideration of NGB-level

medical waivers. 44

* Soldiers with twenty year letters not allowed to enlist in

the ARNG.

* Incentive bonuses and the

Student Loan Repayment

Program (SLRP) suspended.

Non-prior service accessions

of 22,526 were 81.7% of objective,

while prior service accessions

were 38,742, 91.8%. Accession

mix reflects 36.8% non-prior service and 63.3% prior service.

ARNG accession quality was

maintained within established

goals with the exception of high

school diploma graduates, who

were at 84% instead of 94% of

accessions. Inclusion of AHSCH

(GEDs) in this category (15.5%)

raises the percentage to 100.0%.

Additionally, over half of the Test

Category IV enlistments were

applicants whose native tongue

was not English. (All applicants

are required to take the Armed

Forces Vocational Aptitude

Battery (ASVAB) in English.)

Breakout of NPS accession quality for FY94 is as follows:

NON-PRIOR SERVICE

ACCESSION QUALITY

FISCAL YEAR 1994

HSDG... ............ 19,027 ... 845%

AHSCH...... .......... 3,489 .15.5%

TEST

CATEGORY

1-lIlA. ........ 12,486 .. 55.4%

TEST

CATEGORY IV. 487 .... 20%

ENLISTED PERSONNEL

STATUS

ACCESSIONS .61,268

NON-PRIOR

SERVICE .. 22,543

PRIOR SERVICE ..38,742

LOSSES..............73,141

ETS ..... .....14,980

NON-ETS .... 58,742

EXTENSIONS

FIRST TERM . ...... 17,676

CAREERIST.. 32,867

Attrition

The ARNG FY94 goal to reduce

the combined officer and enlisted

attrition rate by 3.0% was

achieved. While the attrition rate

is higher than programmed, it

continues to be lower than previous years. FY94 enlisted losses

of 73,141 represented a 18.4%

attrition rate. The attrition management plan developed for State

strength managers will decrease

non-ETS losses and also focus

on soldiers approaching ETS.

Scheduled force structure reductions created a climate of uncertainty and fueled the perception

that career opportunities would

be limited.

Incentive Programs

Throughout the first half of

FY94 the ARNG offered three

incentive programs: The Selected

Reserve Incentive Program

(SRIP), Student Loan Repayment

Program (SLRP), and the

Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB).

However, effective April 1, 1994,

both the SRIP and SLRP were

suspended due to budgetary

constraints.
N A T I 0 N A L

The Selected Reserve The Student Loan Repayment

Incentive Program (SRIP) provid- Program (SLRP) paid up to

ed enlistment bonuses that may $10,000 in atudent loans over the

be either a $2,000 Standard service career of a soldier.

Bearer critical unit bonus or Payments not to exceed $1,500

$1,500 for other selected units. are made on an annual baaia after

A $1,500 critical skill enlistment verification of eligibility.

bonus was given to applicants

applying for skills designated

as severely short in personnel.

The Montgomery GI Bill

(MGIB) Chapter 1606 (formerly

chapter 106) is for members of

the Selected Reserve. When a

soldier executes a six year contract completes initial active duty

training and remains a member

in good standing, he or she may

be entitled to education benefits

totaling $6,953.52 under the

MGIB. The MGIB will pay for

undergraduate, graduate, post

graduate, vocational, and flight

training. As a drilling Guard

member, the soldier has ten

years after gaining eligibility to

use the program.

Enlisted Personnel

Management

The "Select-Train-PromoteAssign" test program resulted in

a recommendation to the director

of the Army National Guard that

the program be adopted nationwide. Promotion policies will be

changed to allow a state by state

transition from the grade vacancy

selection process now used. Full

implementation is planned for

January 1996. The program will

provide soldiers selected for promotion and leadership assignments the Noncommissioned

Officer Education System course

required for the promotion. This

G U A R D B U R E A U

4s
A N N U A L R Ev I EW OF TH E C H I EF

approach, already implemented in

our current enlisted leader development program, is bringing the

total number of noncommissioned officers trained much closer to the total number promoted.

In consonance with a change

in Army policy the ARNG opened

all TDA positions to women.

The beginning of FY95 will see

an additional six to eight thousand positions opened to women

in the ARNG as a result of the

elimination of the "risk rule"

by the Army.

The Army National Guard

continues to seek a reevaluation

of the GED in the recruiting

criteria. The goal is to have the

GED holder awarded the same

tier status as the High School

Diploma Graduate, which would

entitle them to certain enlistment incentives.

The ARNG implemented procedures to minimize the number

of Initial Active Duty for Training

(IADT) training seats which are

not used. This innovation is projected to accomplish a 100% or

greater fill of available training

seats. Additionally, the new procedures will allow a significantly

greater number of ARNG applicants to receive their "first

choice" Military Occupational

Specialty (MOS).

Officer Personnel

Total officer strength at the end

of FY94 was 45,538, which was

1311 below program. That

strength represents a 1118

decrease from FY93. Attrition

for the year was 10.4 percent.

The attrition rate compares

favorably with FY93 attrition of

11.2 percent. Officer accessions

were below program.

Warrant officer percent of

fill has increased due to force

structure changes. Warrant

officer accessions, however,

remain below desired levels,

and accession programs remain

a high priority.

ROTc. Ninety-seven Assistant

Professor of Military Science

(APMS) and three Professor of

Military Science (PMS) positions

are now filled at selected universities throughout the Nation.

We anticipate that this valuable

program will assist in increasing

lieutenant accessions from

FY94 commISSiONING SOURCES-FOR LIEUTENANTS.

WERE AS FOLLOWS:

ROTC .................... 31%

OCS (State) .................... 50%

OCS (Federal) ........................ 3%

Direct Appointment ........... 13% .

Other......................................... 3%

WARRANT OFFICER STRENGTH FY 92 95

Authorized AssignedFY92 ....................................... 11,040 .......................... 8982

FY 93 .......................................... 9,853 .......................... 9,011

FY94. . ............. .........10,169 .......................... 8 824

FY95 Command Plan..............9,767

46
N A T I O N A L G U A R D B U R E A U

ROTC, which is the second

largest officer producing

program for the ARNG.

OFFICER EDUCATION.

Officer military and civilian education continue to be top priority

in the ARNG, and significant

advancements have been realized

in the past year. Ninety college

hours are now required for commissioning. That will ensure that

lieutenants are well postured to

meet the Congressional requirements of a bachelor's degree

prior to promotion to captain.

The number of lieutenants who

have completed Officer Basic

Course (OBC) within one year

of commissioning has increased

over three percentage points

from FY93 to 75.2 percent.

Policy states that OBC must be

completed within two years of

commissioning. Combined

Services and Staff School is

now required for battalion and

higher command assignments and

selected primary staff positions

at brigade and higher. Additionally, branch specific Pre-Command

Course attendance is required

for assignment to battalion and

higher command positions.

TITLE XI. The ARNG continues to work with the active Army

to facilitate the transition of officers from active duty to the

ARNG. Title XI directs that the

Army will implement programs

that will allow selected ROTC

and US Military Academy lieutenants to separate from the

active Army after two years of

service and prior to the completion of their active duty service

obligation to serve the remainder

of their obligation in the ARNG.

Over 150 officers have been

released from active duty under

this program and are serving in

the ARNG. The ARNG is committed to compliance with the

provisions of Title XI. Initiatives

are focused on development of

one Army standard for deployability, readiness and quality. The

ARNG is dedicated to increasing

the interaction between all Army

components to ensure consistent

policies and constant dialogue on

officer leader development.

47
A N N U A L R E V IE W O F T H E C H IE F

Full-Time Support

The Army National Guard FullTime Support (FTS) Program

provides a cadre of over 51,900

full-time personnel with an annual budget in excess of $3 billion.

The program in FY94 included

24,180 Active Guard Reserve

(AGR) soldiers and 26,820

Military Technicians (MTs). Also

included are Active Component

soldiers assigned to the ARNG

and Department of the Army

civilian employees who work for

the National Guard Bureau.

Full-time support for FY94

(AGR, MR and DA civilians) was

authorized at 66% of validated

requirements. Maintenance of

the current level of full-time support and achievement of additional full-time resources is critical to

support modernizing, changing

priorities, increasing missions,

and expanding roles of the Army

National Guard.

The Army National Guard continues to provide justification to

Department of the Army, DoD

and congress to ensure that

directed missions are adequately

supported by increased Full-Time

support personnel resources. As

a minimum, the ARNG will continue to strive for additional

resources to achieve full-time

support at no less than 80% of

recognized requirements.

AGR PROGRAM. The AGR

level of support (authorized as a

percent of requirements) was 60

percent. Programmed AGR force

reductions from FY93 to FY94 of

506 authorizations, adversely

affected training, administration

and overall readiness at unit

level. From FY91 to FY94,

Congressional authorizations for

AGR soldiers decreased by 2,019.

An AGR selective hiring

freeze, established in December

1991, was continued into FY94

with a full hiring freeze implemented during the FY. The

freeze was necessary to meet the

Congressionally directed authorized level.

Successful AGR job fairs in six

states, coupled with an intensive

job placement program, supported the cross-leveling of the AGR

force, by voluntarily transferring

AGR soldiers from states that

exceeded their AGR authorizations to understrength-states.

AGR transition benefits, such

as 15 year early retirement, variable separation incentives and

special separation benefits were

approved and funded in FY94.

Over 220 AGR personnel were

approved for these programs,

contributing significantly to AGR

program downsizing and the

shaping of the force. AGR transition benefit authority and funding

will continue in Fiscal Year 1995.

TECHNICIAN PROGRAM.

In FY94, requirements for

Military Technicians (MTs) continued to increase and Technician

Force Authorization increased by

175. However, this support was

exacerbated by Technician

Authorization being funded at

only 95% of work years. This

shortfall had an adverse impact in

the maintenance field where

requirements increased due to

equipment modernization. The

FY94 level of support for Technicians was 70% of requirements.
N A T I 0 N A L

FORcE

STRUCTURE

The force structure allowance for

the ARNG during FY94 was

42,000 spaces, compared to

425,000 in FY93. During FY94,

56 units, with 8,400 force structure spaces, were inactivated. A

total of 2,400 spaces were activated, with 700 spaces represented by conversions, updates, and

reorganizations. These actions

affected combat, combat support,

and combat service support units.

The current force structure

plan reduces the ARNG to

405,000 force structure spaces

and an end strength of 367,000

by fiscal year 1999. This plan

incorporates a maneuver force

of 8 divisions and 15 "enhanced

brigades."

Enhanced Brigades

In FY92, the Secretary of

Defense's "Bottom Up Review"

examined ways in which U.S.

armed forces could meet their

strategic responsibilities in the

post-cold war period. This comprehensive assessment reaf49

G U A R D Bs U R E A U
A N N U A L R E V I E W OF

firmed the traditional role of the

Army National Guard, with its

balanced land force, as the active

Army's primary combat reserve.

The ARNG's Enhanced Brigades

will be the Army's principal

reserve component ground combat maneuver force. If needed,

enhanced brigades are expected

to reinforce, augment, and/or

backfill active component units as

required by the theater commander to which they are assigned.

The term "enhanced" refers to

increased resource and manning

priorities, with improved training

strategies, to enable these

brigades to deploy within 90 days

after call up. The brigades will be

employable, command and control-compatible, and logistically

supportable by any U.S. Army

corps or division. The ARNG's

fifteen enhanced brigades are

listed below.

27TH INFANTRY BRIGADE (NY)

29TH INFANTRY BRIGADE (HilCA/OR)

30TH INFANTRY BRIGADE (MECH)

(NC)

39TH INFANTRY BRIGADE (AR)

41ST INFANTRY BRIGADE (OR)

45TH INFANTRY BRIGADE (OK)

48TH INFANTRY BRIGADE (MECH)

(GA)

53D INFANTRY BRIGADE (FL)

76TH INFANTRY BRIGADE (IN)

815T INFANTRY BRIGADE (MECH)

(WA)

116TH CALVARY BRIGADE

(ID/OR/MT/WY)

155TH ARMORED BRIGADE (MS)

218TH INFANTRY BRIGADE (MECH)

(SC)

256TH INFANTRY BRIGADE (MECH)

(LA)

278TH ARMORED CALVARY

REGIMENT (TN)

RESERVE COMPONENT

OFF-SITE AGREEMENT. On

December 10, 1993, the Secretary

of Defense announced a major

restructuring plan for the Army's

reserve components. The "offsite" agreement was worked out

by the senior leaders of the

Active Army, Army National

Guard, Army Reserve, and the

associations representing each

component's members. This was

the first time that the three components have worked together on

a major restructuring initiative.

According to the agreement,

ARNG end strength will be

reduced to 367,000 by FY99 and

beyond. The ARNG will continue

to provide, as it does now, the

main combat reserve forces of

the U.S. Army, with combat service and combat service support

units divided among the Guard

and the Army Reserve. Accordingly, under the terms of the

December agreement most

Army Reserve aviation assets

will be transferred to the Army

National Guard; conversely, some

Guard combat service and combat service support units will

transfer to the Army Reserve.

In order to implement the provisions of the agreement, the

ARNG is reducing the size of its

present aviation force by 40%.

After the full implementation,

which will involve the transfer of

seven utility helicopter battalions

and seven medical companies (air

ambulance) from the USAR, the

ARNG aviation force will be

reduced by some 40%.

MODERNIZATION. During

FY94, ARNG modernization

included the M1A1 Abrahams

tank, Bradley fighting vehicle,

UH-60 Blackhawk, AH-64 Apache

helicopters, multiple launch

rocket systems, and mobile

subscriber communications

equipment. Major restructure

initiatives for aviation and engineer 8 units are underway or

approved for implementation.

T H E C H I E F
N A T I 0 N A L

COMPTROLLER

The FY94 President's Budget

reflected appropriation requests

of $2,230.4 million for Operation

and Maintenance, Army National

Guard (OMING) and $3,290.2 million for National Guard

Personnel, Army (NGPA).

The ONING appropriation is

used to finance the operations of

ARNG activities. Congressional

action, transfers, and reprogramming resulted in a net increase of

$21.1 million and a Total

Obligation Authority (TOA) for

the ONING appropriation for

FY94 of $2,251.5 million.

The NGPA appropriation

finances the pay, allowances,

clothing, subsistence, travel,

bonus payments, and retired

pay accrual costs of ARNG

soldiers. Congressional actions,

transfers, and reprogramming

actions resulted in a net increase

of $158.5 million and a TOA

for NGPA for FY94 of $3,448.7

million.

Accounting

The State Accounting Budget

Expenditure Reservations

System (SABERS) is the accounting system used by the USPFO

to account for and control federal

funds. SABERS was upgraded in

FY94 to change programming

language from FILON COBOL

to "C", resulting in a significant

increase in operating speed.

SABERS has been charged to

accept payroll data from the NGB

pay system STAREPS and the

G U A. R D B U R E A U

51
A N N U A L R E V I E W O F T H E C H I E F

DoD Civilian Pay System (DCPS). the 1st quarter with fielding corn

NGB monthly edits are returned pleted to all states, territories

to the USPFO electronically, and the District of Columbia dur

reducing mail time by about ing the next two quartera.

two weeks. Training vaa conducted for over

160 personnel on the changea. An

AFCOS uaer manual waa written

Business Practices and distributed nationwide. The

result of the changes to AECOS

In 1994 a bold shift towards were to provide program and

commercial business practices fond managers significantiy

was initiated to ensure the ARNG improved control and far more

maintains pace with the intent of efficient use of funds available to

numerous congressional actions. NGB for active duty programs.

The ARNG leadership is being

regularly appraised of the After successfully testing the

requirements in the Government concept at the Connecticut

Performance and Results Act of United States Property and

1993 and the Government Fiscal Office during FY93/94 and

Management Reform Act of receiving approval from the

1994, along with many other Defense Finance and Accounting

streamlining initiatives which fall Service, twelve additional

under the administration's "Re- ISPFOs accepted the mission of

inventing Government" umbrella. paying Active/Guard Reserve

Cost versus benefit is rapidly (AGR) soldiers assigned to their

becoming the paramount consid- states during FY94. The impetus

eration in meeting the ever for moving the function to thes

increasing demands placed on ISPFOs was based on the loss of

our shrinking resources. Defense Accounting Office support, due to Base Realignment

and Closure actions. As the conFinance solidation of the finance network

continues, the goal is for all

Considerable effort was expended USPEOs to assume the AGE

toward improvement of the pay function and provide the

Automated Fund Control Orders best possible finance service

System (AFCOS) during FY94. for our soldiers.

Extensive systems changes were

programmed and tested during

Payroll

Commanders continue to place

emphasis on SUREPAY, bringing

the ARNG participation rate to

nearly 94% by the end of FY94.

The Director of the ARNG issued

a mandatory SUREPAY memorandum 1 June 1994 which

requires all officers and enlisted

accessions into the ARNG to

enroll in SUREPAY upon

appointment or enlistment.

Participation in SUREPAY helps

assure the soldier of continuous

pay support for his family in the

case of mobilization.

States continue to undergo

major changes in the technician

pay arena. Sixteen states converted from the Standard Army

Technician Payroll System

(STAREPS) to the Defense

Civilian Pay System (DCPS) in

FY94. An additional 30 states are

scheduled to convert to DCPS

during FY95 and the remaining

seven convert to DCPS during

FY96.

Seventy-nine STARTEPS messages were sent to the states in

FY94. These messages dealt with

pay, policy issues, and procedures

regarding pay, leave, system

changes and impacts of changes

in policy or law.

55
N A T I O N A L G U A D a B U R E A U

Thirty DCPS messages were having 100% participation. The Awards and

sent to the states in FY94. These overall ARNG participation Incentives

messages dealt with procedures rate at the end of FY94 was

in converting from STARTEPS 93.9 percent The Army National Guard Ideas

to DCPS. for Excellence Program OIF)

Training continues to play a has been actively cleaning-up

All states, territories and the major part in payroll conversions, baclogs in program sobmissions

District of Columbia are partici- There were three thst have carded over from the

pating in the Electronic Funds Implementation Planning Review old suggestions program. There

Transfer (EFT) Program. All (IPR) meetings for the states were 68 suggestions submitted

states have achieved at least 80% converting to DCPS and one this last fiscal year and there

participation, with nine states information course was present- were 114 suggestions completed

ed for all states and territories, or otherwise closed out. Of the

114 closed stbmission, there

53
A NN UA L R E V I eW OF T H E C H I EF

were $55,580 awarded for cost

saving suggestions that saved

$4.9 million. This year the Army

National Guard recognized a

Suggestor of the Year with a trophy and a $25,000 check for a

suggestion that saved the Army

National Guard over $4 million.

The Army Communities of

Excellence award recipients were

Utah ($200,000), Louisiana

($125,000), Maryland ($100,000),

Florida ($50,000), and

Pennsylvania ($25,000). Florida

received an additional $5,000 for

the Roolde of the Year, and the

Most Improved award of $1,000

went to South Carolina. Now in

its sixth year, the Army

Communities of Excellence program continues to foster excellence by emphasizing people,

pride, readiness, facilities, and

services. This program has

become a resource multiplier and

readiness enhancer.

The Minuteman Productivity

Investment Program (MPI) was

closed out at the end of the fiscal

year as one of our unfunded

demands. MPIP was the only program in the Army National Guard

that allowed states to compete

for the purchase of equipment on

the basis of cost savings.

Acquisitions are based on the

most cost effective payback for

dollars spent. Last year the program funded 104 projects at a

cost of $1.3 million. This equipment had a payback of $3.1 million in the first year. The anticipated payback over the economic

life of these projects will equal

$23.4 million.

ENGINEERING

The Army National Guard operates over 3,000 owned and 90

leased armories at 2,700 different

locations, in more than 2,400

communities in all fifty States,

Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands,

Guam, and the District of

Columbia. In addition, the Army

National Guard supports the

operation and maintenance of

21,477 training, aviation, and

logistical facilities on 3,393 installations in 2,670 communities.

These facilities support the

administration and training of

troops and shelter assigned

equipment, aircraft, and maintenance personnel. Adequate facilities are required to sustain unit

readiness and meet mission

objectives.

Twenty-six major construction

projects were completed during

Fiscal Year 1994. Congress

appropriated $188.06 million

for Army Guard military construction for Fiscal Year 1995.

Over 110 additional projects are

scheduled for completion during

1995 and 1996.

In Fiscal Year 1994, $153.6

million was provided for real

property operations and maintenance, 3% less than in Fiscal Year

1993. However, the federally

supported square footage grew

from 55.1 to 55.2 million square

feet. In Fiscal Year 1988, $3.41

per square foot was available to

operate and maintain Army

National Guard facilities. Today,

that amount is only $2.42 per

foot, or $2.03 in constant Fiscal

Year 1988 dollars.

INFORMATION

SYSTEMS

The Information Systems

Directorate used FY94 to

improve computing, communications, and security; enabling the

ARNG to do more computing

faster and at a-lesser cost.

Efforts were concentrated on

systems migration, video teleconferencing, and information

systems security.
- * 4k~- A

1

NN

)

F

Zq

jit

I /

/ /

/

SW a'

/

/

4IN

'iv

/ (

fl'UXV t~ 1. ~iAflvi4~ M4~uJ ~tq ~,XW'44W~C ~

444 ~ k4

"A

'~1

sr..
A N N U A L R E V I E W O F T H F

Automation

During FY94, NGB-AIS began

upgrading the State Data

Processing Installation (DPD

mainframe computers. NGB-AIS

procured new, previously unavailable technologies, allowing NGB

to institute a 14 million dollar

cost avoidance for new systems.

A new high speed processor, the

68040 board, provided additional

processing power and on board

memory for computers in the

field. This dramatically reduced

processing times for all applications in all states and territories.

These changes have allowed

planning for the latest in clientserver, open systems technology,

and architecture required for

21st century needs. NGB-AIS

authorized replacement of multiclient computers with ones that

are DOD compliant.

Migration of an annual training

plan system and officer efficiency

report system from older equipment to the Sperry 5000 in FY94

will realize cost savings as the

older equipment is shut down.

The relational database management system, Oracle, was also

upgraded.

DINAH

In FY94, the last Secure Remote

Terminal (SRT) was removed

from National Guard service.

Now all 54 states and territories

are using DINAH, a computer

based software package that

assists users in preparing, transmitting, and receiving secure

messages. In addition to

increased ease in secure message

transmittal and handling, the

elimination of the SRTs provides

-dramatic annual communications

maintenance cost reductions.

Visual Information

The first stage of providing the

Army National Guard with video

teleconferencing (VTC) capability

was completed with the delivery

of the Low Bit Rate Video

(LBRV) equipment to 53 states

and territories. Implementation

of nation wide VTC service is

planned in FY95. Slow contract

negotiations between the

Defense Information Systems

Agency and AT&T prevented

service this fiscal year.

The Visual Information

Support Center in Nashville, TN

increased production by 36% in

FY94, including increases in tape

duplication, banner production,

and field team missions. The

Rapid Response Documentation

Team was deployed to the Los

Angeles earthquake, Rwanda (in

support of Air Guard activities),

and three southeastern states hit

by floods. They also fielded the

first phase of the new Electronic

Multimedia Imaging Center.

Information Systems

Security

The ARNG's Command

Communications Security (COMSEC) program improved at both

the ARNG staff and state levels

by reducing active ARNG COMSEC accounts to 310. This

exceeded the FY95 objective of a

50% reduction. Increased command COMSEC inspector certification and recertification training

resulted in an improved 81% satisfactory rating for ARNG

COMSEC accounts received during US Army CommunicationsElectronics Command COMSEC

Logistics Activity (USACCSLA)

inspections.

The Army National Guard

Reserve Component Automation

System (RCAS) Command

Authority Program was expanded, granting RCAS key ordering

privileges to 102 ARNG, USAR,

and active Army user representaC H I E
N A T 1 0 N A

~; 

>u I

2K

'7 57

tives. Fielding of the Army Key

Management Systems and

Revised Battlefield Electronic

CEOI System to 173 units and

State Area Commands was 95%

completed by the end of FY94. It

provides capability for frequency

management, CEOI generation,

electronic cryptographic key generation and distribution, and automated electronic COMSEC

accounting.

Reserve Component

Automation System

RCAS equipment was 95-100%

installed in nine western states.

That totals approximately 1500

units. Installation was in various

phases in 14 other states.

NGB-AIS continued working with

RCAS and its contractors to

provide software capable of

bringing the equipment to its

full potential.

ENVIRONMENTAL

PROGRAMS

The Department of the Army's

four "pillars" of environmental

management are Compliance,

Conservation, Prevention, and

Restoration. Accordingly, the

Army National Guard's Environmental Programs Directorate is

organized into four major areas:

Compliance and Restoration,

Conservation, Environmental

Compliance Assessment System

(ECAS), and Resources.

G U A R D B U R E A U

It
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

Compliance and

Restoration

The Army National Guard's hazardous waste program has made

substantial reductions in program

cost through quality initiatives in

administrative management,

technological innovation, and pollution prevention.

The Guard has implemented

several waste quality initiatives,

designed to eliminate or treat

waste water prior to discharge,

and has implemented practices

to prevent storm water from

coming in contact with potential

pollution sources. Obsolete wash

racks are being replaced with

state-of-the-art water filtering

and recycling systems.

We have also seen considerable advancement in the UST

upgrade program in FY94 due to

coordinated efforts between the

NGB's engineering and environmental directorates. The National

Guard Bureau has initiated a

proactive approach to meet

FY99 regulatory deadlines.

Another major emphasis of

the Compliance and Restoration

Division during FY94 was the

Air Quality Program, which has

initiated air pollutant emissions

inventories and air permit

applications to meet new requirements established in the clean

air act amendments of 1990. The

- A-:,,;- . 5 -

58
N A T I O N A L G U A R D B U R E A U

Guard has developed a master Environmental Excellence baaed spent including mere than $13

plan for each state/territory to on its ongoing hazardous waste million in Defenae Environmental

initiate statewide air pollutant reduction program, hazardous Restoration Account funding

emissions inventories. Other sig- waste minimization effort, DST from the Department of the

nificant actions undertaken dur- management, and soil bioremedi- Army. The Directorate received

ing FY94 include the develop- alien project and ohigated approximately 150%

ment of policy and guidance to of the DERA funding originally

implement the newly established programmed for National Guard

Clean Air Act Conformity Rule, Restoration projecta.

establishing balon reduction

requirements and turn-in proce- The Installation Restoration

dures, and continuing projects i Program is committed to protect- Conservation

asbestos surveys, noise evalua- ing hnman health and the ention, and radon assessments. ronment through the proactive The Conservative Divisin proinvestigation and restoration of vides technical guidance to assist

past and current areas of rcta- the 54 states and territories in 5

Prevention mination. The program strives developing and implementing cu

for timely investigation and tural and nstural resource manThe focus of the Army National restoration of contaminated areas agement plans. These plans assist

Guard's Pollution Prevention resulting from past practice haz in preserving the environment

Program is source reduction. The ardous waste disposal practices, while maintaining the ability to

goal is to reduce the release of as well as remediating current train. Many of these resource

toxic pollutants by 50%, using a spills and leakage USTs. plans have been funded through

CY94 baseline. the Department of Defense

During FY94, the Guard con- Legacy Program.

In March 1994, the U.S. Army ducted 33 preliminary assessnamed the Maryland Army menta at facilities nationwide to The continuing implementaNational Guard's Combined determine the potential for past tion of the Integrated Training

Support Maintenance Shop contamination, with 18 completed, Area Management (ITAND plans

(CSMS) at Havre de Grace, and 17 site or remedial investigations has allowed the National Guard

the Indiana Army National Guard (SIs) to determine the presence to match training lands with

winners of the 1993 Army and extent of contamination, and environmental carrying capaciPollution Prevention Award. In eight remedial actions (RAs) to ties. This program has provided

November 1994, the Delaware restore the sites to acceptable for the inventory and monitoring

Army National Guard received standards. Fifteen spill remedia- of environmentally sensitive

the Governor's Award for lions and 48 leaking UST aress such as wetands, endanremovals, investigations, and gered species, and potential

remediations were completed in erosion sites.

FY94. More than $17 million was
R E V I E W 0 F T H F

The Conservation Division also

has responsibility for reviewing

and staffing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents, which provide legal sufficiency and demonstrate environmental responsibility that conforms to state and federal laws.

More than 154 actions were

reviewed and staffed by the

Conservation Branch during

FY94.

There are currently eight

environmental impact statement

reviews underway across the

so country. Two were completed in

FY94, one for Camp Grayling,

MI and the other for Camp

Shelby, MS.

Environmental

Compliance

Assessment System

The Environmental Compliance

Assessment System (ECAS) identifies areas of noncompliance

with environmental and pollution

prevention requirements, recommends corrective actions, and

identifies resources needed to

implement the corrections.

Funding for corrective actions

from ECAS assessments is then

identified and programmed.

Assessments are conducted by a

team of professional environmental consultants.

To date, the Army National

Guard has completed 42 assessments. The remainder of the

states will be assessed by the end

of FY95. All Army National

Guard facilities within each state

are assessed to include armories,

maintenance shops, U.S.

Property and Fiscal Offices and

warehouses, training areas, and

aviation support facilities.

Thousands of facilities within the

42 states have been assessed, and

the ECAS findings are that hazardous waste, solid waste, and

Clean Water Act issues are the

primary areas of concern.

Currently, 31 final ECAS reports

have been completed.

Resources

The Resources Division was formally organized in June 1994, to

focus on all matters pertaining to

training, budgeting, manpower,

and database management as

they relate to environmental

management and the protection

of natural and cultural resources.

Planning was begun for 10 different environmental training courses to be offered in FY 95, such as

National Environmental Policy

Act, Basic Environmental

Staffing, Hazardous Waste,

Environmental Risk

Communications, and others.

AVIATION

Modernization of the ARNG aviation fleet is critical to success on

the modem battlefield. The first

ARNG fielding of the state-ofthe-art armed scout aircraft,

Kiowa Warrior (OH-58D), was

completed in FY94. The aviation

fleet was also enhanced by the

UH-60 refurbishment program.

The ARNG will receive approximately 300 refurbished UH-60s

as a result of Active Army force

reductions.

The Army National Guard

is facing a critical shortage of

H-60, Black Hawk helicopters.

The only early deploying (CFP 1)

UH-1 helicopters in the Total

Army are ARNG MEDEVAC

aircraft. Not only is the UH-1

becoming operationally obsolete,

it will soon become logistically

insupportable on the modem

battlefield. Current UH-60

procurement/fielding plans are

A N N U A L C H I E F
N A T I 0 N A L

not sufficient to cover minimum

modernization requirements.

These simulation devices for the

CH-47 Chinook will provide

regional support to both ARNG

and Active crew members. The

UH-60 and CH-47 simulators

became available from the

Active Army. The AH-64

Combat Mission Simulator is

a new procurement.

International

Missions

An ARNG Security Assistance

Team assisted in the hand-off of

the peace-keeping mission in

Somalia. In February 1994, the

team traveled to Somalia to train

Pakistani pilots, as well as maintenance and armament specialist

for the AH-iS Cobra helicopter.

The Cobras were transferred

from the Hawaii Army National

Guard. Despite the austere conditions, the training program was

a complete success.

The ARNG sent a fixed wing

instructor pilot to Argentina to

train local pilots on the use of

aircraft sensors.

G U A R D B3 U R E A U

61
A N N U A L R Ev IEW O F TH E C H IE F

Domestic Missions

The ARNG responded to several

domestic emergencies in FY94.

Our aviation fleet provides a critical service to local, state and federal agencies in response to natural disasters. ARNG aviation

proved invaluable in FY94 in

response to floods, earthquakes,

forest fires, and other disasters.

During January 1994, the

ARNG responded to the 6.8 magnitude earthquake that ravaged

Southern California. The ARNG

provided transportation for critical health, safety and security

personnel, and supplies. Over 600

hours were flown consisting of

706 sorties transporting 5,300

passengers and 87,000 pounds

of cargo.

The ARNG conducted significant fire-fighting operations in

Arizona, California, Colorado,

Idaho, and Washington. In

California alone, over 900 flight

hours were flown. The operations

included extensive use of helicopter mounted water buckets to

drown raging fires.

From July 6th to August 4th,

1994, the Georgia ARNG provided humanitarian relief for the

"500 year flood" that impacted

the Southwestern portion of the

state. Operation "Crested River"

consumed over 1,200 flying hours

performing various aviation missions to include search and rescue, medical evacuations, transportation of medical personnel,

engineer equipment, tents, and

drinking water.

The ARNG provided the

majority of the aviation support

for the World Cup Soccer Games.

Safety

During FY94, the ARNG experienced an overall downward trend

in the number and associated

costs of both ground and aviation

accidents. The number of Ground

Class A accidents declined from

25 in FY93 to 17 in FY94. Eleven

of the 17 were private automobile

accidents. Concurrently, the number of Ground Class B accidents

declined from 7 to 2. The costs

associated with ground accidents

also experienced significant

reduction, from $12,6 million in

FY93 to $7.3 million in FY94.

While flying more than

340,000 hours, ARNG aviation

experienced zero Class A accidents during FY94; a reduction of

three from FY93. There was one

Class B aviation accident, also a

reduction of three from FY93.

Significantly, ARNG aviation experienced zero fatalities in FY94

as compared with 13 in FY93, and

reduced the associated costs of

aviation accidents from $24.5 million to just over $1 million.

Overall, accident cost reduction

was approximately $30.4 million.

In FY94, Army National Guard

safety and force protection programs continued to emphasize

safety awareness, training and

education, and countermeasures.

Safety awareness was highlighted

by the "Safety-Picture It"

Campaign in FY94. Safety training included the Annual Safety

and Occupational Courses

(AMPOC). Countermeasure programs included video productions

by the multi-media branch aimed

at specific hazards, accident prevention surveys designed for the

various flight facilities, and constructive evaluations targeted on

state safety programs. These

programs, in conjunction with

leader involvement at all levels,

have made safety an ARNG success story for FY94.

ARNG leaders and soldiers are

fully involved in risk management

procedures which insure that

safety is integrated throughout

all operations so that our personnel, equipment, and environment

are preserved for the future.

62

t
AIR

NATIONAL

GUARD
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

DIRECTORATE

OF

OPERATIONS,

PLANS, AND

PROGRAMS

The directorate develops and

directs overall policy for all matters related to the planning, programming and execution of ANG

forces for mobilized and nonmobilized mission taskings, and

capabilities requirements.

Plans Division

The Plans Division is responsible

for developing, integrating and

maintaining a comprehensive

operations planning and analysis

program for the Air National

Guard. The division maintains an

active interface with HQ USAF

major commands, state and unit

planners, and is the primary advisor to the joint chiefs of staff, the

NGB, and HQ USAF on Total

Force policy, force mix, deliberate

planning, access and mobilization.

LONG RANGE PLANNING.

As executive agent for the ANG

Long Range Planning Committee,

the Plans Division acts as the primary catalyst for the ANG Long

Range Plan, consolidating the Air

Guard's vision, goals and collective interests into a "road map"

that can be integrated with

future Air Force plans. The plans

for FY95 include special reports

from the last five years on issues

important to the future of the Air

National Guard.

FORCES AND RESOURCES.

The Forces Branch and the

Resources Branch are focal

points for all matters pertaining

to Air Guard aviation units.

Preparation for the new planning

cycle has caused a flurry of activity as planners throughout the

Air Force try to incorporate new

concepts and more efficient planning procedures into the development of a war-fighting scenario

for two simultaneous conflicts.

Plans division personnel have

coordinated closely with Air

Force planners in developing the

revised Joint Strategic

Capabilities Plan, and providing

extensive revisions to the Air

Force's War and Mobilization

Plan - the two most critical

war-planning documents.

Operations and

Programs

Reductions in the active duty

force structure have made newer

aircraft available for modernization of ANG flying units and also

offer an opportunity for the ANG

to take on new missions. The

Combat Forces and Mobility

Forces branches determine the

mix and bed-down of all ANG aircraft and related combat support

forces. Additionally, they provide

programming information to the

Air Force to secure funding for

ANG aircraft operations.

The Program Integration

Branch is responsible for updating and maintaining the accuracy

of ANG data contained in Air

Force program documents. The

branch also publishes the annual

ANG Facts and Figures book.

Operations

Directorate

Fighters

Over 30% of the general-purpose

fighters in today's Total Force

are in the Air National Guard.

The mission of ANG F-16s,

A/OA-10s, F-15s and F-4Gs

includes close air support,

air superiority air interdiction,

offensive and defensive counterair, and suppression of enemy

air defenses.
N A T I 0 N A L

ANG forces participated in

CONUS exercises such as Red

Flag, Air Warrior and Gunsmoke

competitions, as well as in international exercises like Display

Determination and Central

Enterprise. ANG forces are more

involved with overseas exercises

and contingencies as the active

duty forces draw down. ANG

fighter forces were instrumental

in providing fighter support and

relieving active forces during

Operation Deny Flight over the

skies of Bosnia/Herzogovina.

The Idaho ANG continued

to support Operation Southern

Watch/Desert Calm on the

Arabian Peninsula. The 124th

Fighter Group deployed an

average of 100 people to support

flight operations for six aircraft.

Personnel were deployed in

six rotations to cover the sixmonth period.

The ANG conducts the

nation's only F-16A/B training.

The ANG also provides this

training for several foreign

countries, including the Netherlands, Bahrain, and Singapore.

The number of foreign nations

receiving this training is expected to increase.

Close Air Support

Close air support (CAS) remains

an integral part of the ANG missions. In FY94, ANG units composed of A-10 and F-16 aircraft

provided direct support to U.S.

Army units throughout the world,

-7-'

G U A R D B U R E A U

67
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

and also supported United

Nations peacekeeping forces in

Bosnia. ANG ground support elements such as our Air Control

Party Flights and Air Support

Operations Centers are realigning and relocating in order to

better support current and

upcoming Army requirements

and force structure changes.

Airlift

Air National Guard airlifts are

active in worldwide relief efforts,

and FY94 was a record-setting

year for ANG airlifters. In addition to supporting JCS-directed

exercises, Air National Guard C-5

and C-141 strategic aircraft flew

in support of U.S. operations in

Somalia, Rwanda, and Haiti. Air

National Guard C-141s were used

to help the Air Mobility

Command perform its global mission when 40% of the force was

grounded due to wing cracks.

C-130 theater airlift aircraft

are flown throughout the world

by Air Guard personnel. ANG

units supported contingency

operations in Bosnia, as well as

Somalian relief efforts. C-130

units supported the ongoing

SOUTHCOM mission in Central

and South America with operation Coronet OAK.

The C-130 fleet continued to

modernize in FY94, as new C130H aircraft were delivered to

the 145th Airlift Group, North

Carolina ANG and the 153d Airlift

Group, Wyoming ANG. These

new aircraft have night vision

goggle-compatible cockpits, low

power color radar, and a comprehensive airlift defensive suite.

68
N A T J 0 N A A

Aerospace Defense

Forces

The ANG provides 100% of the

fighters tasked for air defense of

the continental United States,

with Air Guard F-15s and F-16s

maintaining kround the clock alert

at sites throughout the U.S.

Flying the modernized F-16,

North Dakota's 119th Fighter

Group won the Air Force's

William Tell '94 Competition.

Air Defense units deployed to

Howard AFB, Panama to support

the ANG's "Cornet Nighthawk"

program. This and other air

defense operations continue

support of the nation's drug

interdiction program.

Reconnaissance

The ANG provides 100% of the

Air Force's tactical reconnaissance capabilities and is subject

to worldwide tasking. The RF-4C

fleet continues to receive modifications to improve service life

and combat capability. Using the

Long Range Optical Photography

System (LOROPS), these aircraft

provide capability to support both

worldwide contingencies and the

nation's counter-drug programs.

ANG RF-4Cs continue to be

valuable for other peacetime

needs, such as providing photo

coverage for state and federal

emergencies.

Deep Interdiction

For the first time in its history,

the Air National Guard has activated a heavy bomber unit, the

184th Bomber Group, Kansas

ANG. The first B-IB aircraft

were delivered this year, with

additional aircraft scheduled for

selected units in FY95.

Aerial Refueling

The Air National Guard provides

approximately 43% of the Air

Force KC-135 air refueling assets

worldwide. In FY94, the ANG

accepted delivery of 30 additional

KC-135R aircraft, bringing the

total number of ANG KC-135s

to 221.

The 19 ANG KC-135 units' primary mission is to provide air

refueling in support of Strategic

Force Command's Single

Integrated Operational Plan

(SIOP). The tanker units' secondary mission of supporting

global contingency operations is

gaining in importance as the

active duty KC-135 force has

been reduced, and worldwide

deployments have increased

tremendously. In FY94, Air

Guard tankers participated with

Air Mobility Command forces

during operations in Bosnia,

Rwanda, Somalia, and Haiti. The

recent closures of the last active

duty KC-135 bases in the

Northeast requires Air Guard

tankers to assume the Northeast

Tanker Task Force mission,

which has been accepted by two

units and supported by all ANG

tanker units.

The KC-135 fleet provides

additional airlift capability for

channel missions, and relieving

the over-tasking of strategic airlifters. The recent acquisition of

floor rollers for the tankers

allows cargo to be on and

offloaded with greater ease.

Special Operations

The 193d Special Operation

Group, Pennsylvania ANG, is the

only airborne special operations

units in the ANG. The unit's missions support the Senior Scout,

Volant Solo, and the Air force

Information Command. The 193d

is the most deployed combat unit

in the ANG.

69

G U A R D B U R E A U
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

Rescue

The three ANG air rescue units

are equipped with HC-130 tanker

aircraft and HH-60G helicopters.

During FY94 the 210th Rescue

Squadron in Alaska assumed

command and operations of the

Air Rescue Coordination Center

at Elmendord AFB, and the

Resource Detachment at Eielson

AFB, providing timely search

and resource coverage for the

Eielson Range complex. In

addition to emergency rescue

operations, the ANG rescue units

70 also support NASA during space

shuttle takeoffs and landings.

Weather

Comprising 58% of the Total

Force Army weather support

team, 33 ANG weather flights

provide weather support to various U.S. Army units, including

divisions, separate brigades, an

armored cavalry regiment

Special Forces groups, continental U.S. Army headquarters, and

numerous mobilization stations.

The majority of direct combat

support is to the Army

National Guard.

During FY94, weather flight

volunteers sustained a six-month

operation in Central America

in support of exercise Fuertes

Caminos, deploying two-week

rotations from January through

June. Another major highlight

of 1994 was the welcoming of

several flights for advanced training at the newly-opened Weather

Readiness Center at Camp

Blanding, Florida, which provides

tactical and technical training

unavailable elsewhere.

Directorate for

Acquisition

The main function of the

Directorate for Acquisition is

to improve the capability of Air

National Guard weapons systems.

During Fiscal Year 1994, efforts

were concentrated in a number

of different areas.

Fighters

F15 AIRCRAFT. TheF-15A/B

Multi-Stage Improvement

Program (MSIP) remains a top

priority of the Air National

Guard. MSIP provides radar

improvements, a larger central

computer, advanced medium

range air-to-air missile capability,

and growth potential through

improved wiring and bus structures. Currently, 74 modification

kits have been procured. Combined with 26 modified aircraft

transferred from the active Air

Force fleet, five of the six Air

National Guard F-15 units have

been MSIP-equipped.

F-16 AIRCRAFT. The F-16

phased upgrade program continues. Part of this upgrade includes

a survivability enhancement that

provides a self-protection suite

for a wide spectrum of threats.

This suite is being purchased

through an improvement program that includes radar warning

receivers and countermeasures

dispensing system enhancements.

The Air Force validated the need

for this self-protection capability

and made a production incorporation decision for new F-16

aircraft. Earlier block aircraft

have not been programmed for

a retrofit.

A/OA-lo AIRCRAFT. During

FY94, numerous improvements

to this fleet were initiated.

Installation of night vision goggle

capability will began in November

1994, with expected completion

in FY97. Upgrades to the Low

Altitude Safety and Targeting

Enhancement system software
N A T I 0 N A U

were made, giving pilots ground

collision avoidance warning, continuous computed impact point,

enhanced altitude control, and an

air-to-air gunsight. A quick reaction effort was made to replace

30 minute capable video records

with two-hour-capable records

for A-10's deployed over Bosnia.

This 8MM cockpit video system

will be fielded in all ANG A/OA10's in the very near future.

RF-4C AIRCRAFT. The major

new program for the RF-4C that

began in FY94 was the installation of the ARC-186. The addition

of this VHF radio has improved

the worldwide deployment capability of the RF-4C and improves

communication with other aircraft within combat kill areas.

Aircraft Engines

The 220E engine retrofit is the

number-one safety modification

for F-16 aircraft. The upgrade,

which includes adding digital

electronic engine control, an

engine diagnostic unit, and fan

drive turbine provides commanality across the F-15 and F-16

fleets. Useable in both types of

aircraft, the 220E engine significantly improves reliability and

maintainability, reducing overall

maintenance by 35 to 40 percent.

71

G U u R B U R E A U
DAy...THE NATIONAL GUARD

NU 15y HISTORIC MIsSION

AN A INTEGRAL PART OFTH

TION'S FIRST-LINE DEFENS"E*
N A T I 0 N A I

Electronic

Countermeasures

Equipment

The Air National Guard continues to modernize its ECM pod

capability, with early models

almost completely replaced.

The ANG is on schedule to have

all F-16 and A/OA-10 units

equipped with new pods by the

middle of FY95. Working with

the active Air Force, upgrading

of the F-15 A/B aircraft is almost

complete. Similarly, the ANG is

upgrading ALR-69 radar warning

receivers carried on the F-16,

C-130, EC-130 and A/OA-10

aircraft to increase reliability

and maintainability

Training Equipment

PART TASK TRAINER (PTT).

The Air National Guard's F-15/F16 part task trainer is the first

operationally fielded trainer costing under $1 million to provide

training in air-to-air, air-toground, emergency engine air

starts, and instrument approaches. Configured to support the

non-MSIP F-15A and F-16A block

10/15 pilot continuation training

at ANG units, 14 PTTs were

fielded to provide a viable alternative to high-cost simulators.

AIR COMBAT MANEUVERING INSTRUMENTATION

(ACMI) RANGES. The Air

National Guard established three

state-of-the-art ACMI ranges at

the Air Combat Readiness

Centers at Volk Field, WI;

Savannah, GA; and Gulfport, MS.

All ranges are operational with

final system acceptance of an

expansion to the Gulfport range

scheduled for FY95.

These ranges record aircraft

maneuvers during air-to-air and

air-to-ground missions and transmit them to a ground station,

greatly improving the training

for units in the local flying area

and for those units' deployment

for their Annual Training. The

Advanced Debriefing Display

Systems station will provide

additional training capability by

transmitting data to the units'

home stations.

TRAINING

The Training Directorate

(ANGRC/TE) is responsible for

formal school training, enlisted

specialty training and professional military education for Air .

National Guard members. During

FY94, ANGRC/TE responded to

over 34,000 requests for school

quotas. In addition, TE is responsible for the management of Air

National Guard workdays, to

include programming and budgeting of formal school workdays,

and current-year execution of all

ANG workdays. TE also established policies and procedures

for administering and controlling

base workday programs. The

ANG used approximately

8,000,000 ANG-funded workdays

in FY94. Almost 285,000 of these

workdays were earmarked for

state and federal counternarcotics support.

On-the-Job Training

Continuing to implement 'year of

training" initiatives, programs

designed to increase the rigor

and discipline in Air Force training and education systems, the

Training Directorate produced an

informational video to educate all

ANG members about new and

modified programs. To ensure

the continuous improvement of

the program, the Training

Directorate and Air Force major

commands have submitted suggested changes to the Air Staff

based on customer input.

73

G U A R D B U R E A U
A N N U A L R E V I W C H I E

Alternative Training will allow ANt members to par has establihed an outreach pro

Methods and ticipste in training produced by gram designed to assist units in

Delivery Systems active duty counterparts. developing their own education

programs mn conjunction with

Tasked with examining innovative The Training Directorate is local colleges and universities.

alternative training methods and s evaluating video taped, multito determine the most efficient media and computer based train- Professionsl Military

and effective means of training ing systems for applicability in Education opportunities continue

members of the ANG, the ANG training programs. These to increase as distributedlearnTraining Directorate has been training methods are either ing and distance leaning

involved in analyzing emerging stand-alone or can be used to methodologies are developed,

training technologies and in supplement satellite-transmitted tested, and implemented. The

exploring alternative methods of courses. The utilization of these newest enlisted PME program is

training, such as satellite trans- alteative methods will reduce the Airman Leadership School

mission of courses. travel costs and time off-station (ALS). which is designed for

for all ANG personnel. senior airmen and taught at unit 74 The Training Directorate is level. Interest in the in-resident

currently coordinating agree- ALS expenence is evident by the

ments for satellite transmitted projected establishment of nearly

courses with the Air Force 30 local ANG programs.

Institute of Technology, Air In conjunction with these techniUniversity, Air Education and cal traig programs, formal

Training Command (Field education programs, both military

Training Detachment) and the and civilian, provide ANG mem- PERSONNEL

ANG NCO Academy (Distance hers with the management leadLearning Initiative). The Training ership, and technological t FY9 wa tion For

Directorate is also working with necessary to enhance their mi

various Pentagon-based agencies tary and civilian occupations.

to export courses to field units, definition of ANG taskings for

regardless of their DoD branch ANG enlisted members are the "two msjor regional rot

affiliation. automatically eurolled in the geocies" scenario continued the

Community College of the Air downsizing that had begun in

The ANG is in the process of Force (COAT), associate degree- FY93. Projections indicate that

installing three~transmitter sites granting institute. Information this trend will continue, with the

and over 250 receiver sites and recognition programs offered moat significant reductions

throughout the ANG. This by both TE and CCAF have been occurring in FY96. These factors

resource will enable the ANG to very well received and have contributed to a degree of perrespond to training needs in a resulted in approximately 5,380 sonnel turhulence and a sense of

quick and efficient manager and ANG graduates. In addition, TE uncertainty in many AN units.
N A T I 0 N A L

Deployments

The Air National Guard had personnel involved in the support of

over 300 operations in FY94, and

a typical week found 800 ANG

personnel deployed. These operations included Deny Flight,

Phoenix Shark, Provide Comfort,

Provide Hope, Provide Promise,

Provide Relief, Restore Hope,

Sea Signal, Southern Watch,

Steady State, Support Hope,

Support Justice, and Uphold

/Maintain Democracy.

To facilitate participation, and

to provide better service to field

units, ANGRC obtained access to

the Worldwide Military Command

and Control System (WWMCCS)

in FY94. This access enables the

ANG to enter the planning and

execution systems for Air Force

75

and joint operations and to provide units with timely information

needed for deployment.

Strength

This increased participation in

real world contingencies

occurred simultaneously with a

reduction in available personnel.

The Air National Guard ended

G UIS A R D B U R E A U
R E V I E W O F T H E C H I E F

FY94 with an assigned end reducing the cycle time of crest- Guard AGR Separation Incentive

strength of 113,587, well below log, updating and maintaining a Program (ASIP) is another tranthe 117,700 authorized by new recruit package. Second, the sition tool to encourage full time

Congress. An increasingly diffi- program will provide units, state military members to voluntarily

cult recruiting environment headquarters and ANGRC/DPR separate in order to avoid involwas evident in many areas of the the means with wich to identify ntary separations or reductions

country, but the primary reason and track leads and their source. in force. Incentives include

for reduced strength levels was Tis will enhance national adver- VSI/SSB and early retirement

the fact that many commanders tislog efforts by providing num- authority.

were reluctant to bring new bers on the most effective means

people into units when they face of advertising. Emphasis will connew force structure reductions tinue to be placed on improving Programs

in the future. the diversity of units and helping

them become more reflective of FY94 marked significant chatnge

The ANG's full-time programs, the demograpics of their rem- in many personnel programs. All

however, continue to meet end munities. ANG Consolidated Base

strength objectives. The mili- Personnel Offices (CEPO's) were

tary technician strength on reorganized and redesigned

September 30, 1994 was 24,063 Military Personnel Flights

and the Active Guard/Reserve (MPFs). The new MPF structure

(AGR) program totaled 9,312. For those units forced to involun will aid in providing more effitarily separate members, cient service to customers and

Congress extended authorization will provide more interoperablity

Recruiting for transition benefits until 1999. with the other components of the

The Reserve Transition Total Force. The installation of

One effort to aid recruiters in Assistance Program (RTAP) Personnel Concept ID (PC-Ill) at

this difficult environment was the seeks priority placement for all flying units was completed.

development and fielding of a released individuals to be Tis advanced personnel data

national recruiting automation retained elsewhere in the organi system is designed to provide

program. The program will zations. Failing tis, the involun- unit commanders access to resl

accomplish two very important tarily separated drill status mem- time personnel data. The instalobjectives. First, it will automate her is offered a series of benefits, tion was completed at a cost saythe office procedures of the ANG based on rank and seniority, to logs of $9 million due to innovareriting force, significantly include separation pay, an early tive changes and utilization of

retirement feature, or special existing conmuncations and

separation pay. The Air National technology. The installation of

Real Time Automated Personnel

Identification System (RAPIDS)

A N N UA L
N A T I O N A L G U A R D B U B E A U

equipment continued in the ANG

with 15 units on line at the end of

FY94 and 53 more scheduled for

FY95. This equipment allows

organizations to issue the new

automated ID cards. All Air

Force specialty codes were

changed and, although this

required a complete rewrite of all

existing edits throughout the personnel data system, it proceeded

smoothly. Finally, officer management will be impacted for years

due to the Congressional passage

of the Reserve Officer Personnel

Management Act.

Awards

During FY94, ANG members and

units were recognized for their

outstanding achievements and

dedicated service in support of

peacekeeping missions, humanitarian relief, domestic improvements, and most important of all

- the defense of America. The

Director of the Air National

Guard awarded the Air Force

Outstanding Unit Award to 33

ANG units and organizations for

exceptionally meritorious service.

Air National Guard members

were awarded the Humanitarian

Service Medal for their participation in Fire Storm 91 the

Mississippi River Flood Relief

Operation, and the California

Earthquake Relief Operation.

The Joint Meritorious Unit

Award was also authorized for

eligible members who participated in Joint Task Force missions

Provide Relief, Provide Promise,

and the Combined Task Force

mission Provide Comfort II.

PLANS,

PROGRAMS,

AND

MANPOWER

The various force structure

changes within the ANG resulted

in the reduction of 1,049 mobilization manpower requirements and

554 full-time manpower requirements. This action, combined

with other manpower changes

such as Unit Type Code revisions

and implementation of manpower

standards, produced end of FY94

totals of 117,952 mobilization

requirements and 36,52L full-time

requirements. These totals represent ANG unit requirements,

and do not include ANGRC or

NGB requirements.

On December 6, 1993, the

ANG received Air Force Chief of

Staff approval of the objective

organization aligning the ANG

flying units with the Air Force

organizational structure. This

new structure replaces the quaddeputy structure with a tri-group

structure, establishing an operations group, logistics group, and

support group. Clinics and hospitals were all redesignated as

Medical Squadrons under the

new ANG structure. A vice commander was established for each

ANG flying wing/group in conjunction with this reorganization.

The ANG did not adopt the

new Air Force maintenance organizational structure, pending the

results of a test to determine the

feasibility of splitting the maintenance function between the operations and logistics groups. Upon

completion of the test, the decision was made to align all maintenance functions within the logistics group for all ANG flying

wings/groups. This decision was

submitted to the Air Force chief

of staff for approval on June 23,

1994. The ANG has not received

CSAF approval as of the end of

FY94; however, indications are

that the ANG proposed maintenance structure will be approved.

77
A N N U A L R EV I E W 0 F T H E C H I EF

Reductions

In FY94 the NGB and the Air

National Guard Readiness Center

(ANGRC) were directed by

AF/PEP to take a 15% manpower

infrastructure reduction. This

reduction included both military

and civilian positions - 5 Air

Force positions and 67 civilian

positions for a total of 72. The

ANGRC Staff Management (SM)

Directorate in coordination with

NGB and ANGRC functional

managers developed a plan to

carry out the reduction with

the least amount of adverse

impact to ANGRC and NGB

Directorates. The plan also anticipates no job losses as a consequence of the position reductions.

FY94 also brought on a reduction in the number of high-grade

civilian positions within NGB and

ANGRC Directorates. Executive

Order 12839 called for a reduction in the number of senior

executive service, GS/GM-14 and

15, or other equivalent positions.

This reduction was a part of the

Clinton/Gore Administration's

effort to reinvent a smaller, more

effective government. To comply

with the order, the NGB and

ANGRC downgraded a total of

six high-grade positions.

Personnel

Management

The ANGRC Staff Management

Directorate instituted a new

concept in serving the human

resource needs of the NGB.

Directorates now have a single

point of contact called a

Personnel Resource Manager

(PRM). The PRM has a triad

of responsibility serving the

National Guard Bureau, the

Directorate, and the Statutory

Tour individual. Corporate memory, long range planning, and

analysis has improved since the

PRM implementation. Statutory

Tour personnel are pleased with

the improved information flow

concerning upwar mobility

career enhancement, and policy.
N A T I O N A L G U A R D B U R E A U

Another initiative of the Staff The OMANG appropriation is Military Construction

Management is the Year Group used to finance the operations for

Assignment Process (YGAP). ANG sctivities. Congressional iltr oruton $prpra

Traditionally, manning and career action, transfers, and reprogram- in for te $2413

decisions were made a year out ring resslted in suet decrease million for

from a statutory tour individual's of $7.5 million and a Total incd t2umion for

established date of separation. Obligation Authority (TOA) for

This resulted in making decisions the OMANG appropriation for unspecified minor construction

without considering affects on FY94 of $2,649.7 million. projecta, and $10.9 million for

the whole program. The YGAP planning and design.

will facilitate decisions to be In FY94, the Air National

made concurring like groups of Guard funded the technician

people. For example, all colonels strength program from the presi- Direct Deposit

and chief master sergeants will dent's budget The ANG Flying

be reviewed as a group popula- Hour program was fully funded

tion. Factored into this process and executed, meeting basic unit m the direct deposit program

will be long range planning for training requirements for the us remains at an all-time high, say

lieutenant colonels and senior cal year. Prudent fiscal manage- ing money

master sergeants. The YFAP will met allowed allocation of and headaches for members.

enhance career planning while resoces in support of ANG Mandatory participation started

maintaining a strong emphasis on missions, on Setember ir99Sn

mission q The MILPERS appropriation and education by fieldunit finanfinances pay, allowances, clothing, cial managers have boosted parsubsistence, travel, bonus pay- ticipation to nearly all ANG

FINANCIAL menta, and retired pay accrual members. As of September1994, costs for ANG members. average ANG unit participation IVIANAGEMENT Congressional actions and repro- has grown to 98.2%. Of the 69

grammning actions resulted in a ANG payrolls offices:

Comptrollernet Co increase of $47.7 million, and prolra TOA for IVILPERS in FY94 of 65 have achieved over 95%

The FY94 president's budget 1245.7 million. FY94 was a chal- participation

reflected appropriation requests lenging year for IILPERS 62 have achieved a commandof $2,657.2 million for Operations appropriations. Excellent interac- able 96% participation

and Maintenance, Air National ton between field units and Air 39 have achieved an

Guard (OMANG), and $198.0 National Guard Readiness Center outatanding 99% participation

million for Military Personnel (ANGRC) directorates allowed 2 bases have had 109% partici-

(ITLPERS). unit mission training require- pation for one or more months

ments to be accomplished.

79
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

The ANG goal remains 100

percent participation in Direct

Deposit for both officer and

enlisted members. Through the

efforts of many people devoting

much time and energy to this

program, the ANG is close to

achieving this goal. Of 103,726

Guard members 101,858 have

Direct Deposit.

COMMAND,

CONTROL,

80 COMMUNICATIONS AND

COMPUTERS

Faced with changing mission

imperatives and burgeoning bandwidth requirements, the Air

National Guard sought out ways

to consolidate multiple voice,

data, graphic and video networks

onto an integrated, high-performance, multimedia infrastructure. The ANG enterprise network provides a powerful and

flexible network architecture that

efficiently serves a wide range of

business applications and service

types, each within its own unique

networking requirements. This

network architecture also enables

the ANG to gradually integrate in

various combinations separated

voice, video, data and local area

and wide area networks ILANS/

WANS) onto a powerful and costeffective enterprise network.

This network consolidation is

accomplished through networkwide intelligent traffic management capabilities that dramatically differentiate it from conventional solutions. Using the

advanced routing and traffic

management capabilities, the

ANG can dramatically control

and manage a wide variety of

network traffic more efficiently

and simply, while optimizing network bandwidth, minimizing

congestion, and maximizing

performance.

The System Telecommunications Engineering ManagerUnit (STEM-U) program was

installed at all 19 Engineering

and Installation (E&D units in

the ANG, and at present 17 units

have hired personnel to document both the known and projected communications infrastructure into a blueprint. The

E&I community is also starting

to upgrade the LANS at the ANG

flying units. In addition, the E&I

community is the only installer of

the Air Force Civil Engineering

LANs (HQ AFCEA) at 85 locations worldwide.

Another area that has experienced widespread activity is the

combat communications support

of numerous exercises and realworld contingencies. All available

systems have been fielded in support of MAJCOM and CINC

requirements. Systems include

satellite communications,

HF/Independent Sideband

(HF/ISB) systems, VHF/UHF

air-to-ground, and digital switching systems. Operations supported include, but are not limited to:

Deny Flight, Restore Hope, Sea

Signal, Steady State (SJ-IV), and

Uphold Democracy. Presently,

there are over 50 combat communications personnel and

associated systems deployed

in CONUS and OCONUS

locations in support of mission

requirements.

The Air Staff, in conjunction

with a directed reduction of ANG

Air Traffic Control (ATC) activities from 19 to 13, also directed

the ANG to ensure ATC controllers maintain currency. As a

result, NGB/CF has directed SC

to provide recommendations for

the reduction and repositioning

of ATC resources and currency

for the remaining 13 missions.

New unit locations were

announced at the Senior

Commanders Conference.

Several locations are at ANG

sites, and were formally serviced
N A T IO N A L G U A N U B U R E A U

by FAA assets. The FAA will provide funds to the ANG to operate

these towers, thus providing

service to the community and

proficiency training to the ANG.

The ANG is working with

headquarters, the Air Force

Flight Standards Agency

(AFFSA) and the FAA in developing new computer aided force

flight standards. One such training package is a compact diskbased interactive program to provide recurring training to both

controller and maintenance personnel. Through this partnership,

the ANG will develop and distribute 20 percent of all new products. In addition, the ANG will

have access to all products developed by the AFFSA and the FAA.

This new approach significantly

reduces required instructor time

and enhances overall ATC training capabilities through the use

of full-motion color videos, interactive computer programs, and

student tracking and testing.

The ANG is gaining additional

responsibilities through the conversion of the 1st Air Force

Defense Mission from the active

Air Force to the ANG.

ANGRC/SC accomplished unit

level reorganization of the communications flights in the objective wing structure, to include

realignment of military workload

and revised technician position

description.

LOGISTICS

Aircraft Maintenance

B-1S BOMBER. The firstAir

National Guard B-1B arrived at

the 184th Bomb Group,

McConnell AFB, Kansas in July

1994. This is the first time the

Air National Guard has had long

range bombers in its fleet. The

full complement of B-1Bs were

on board in October '94. The

184th is also participating in a

congressionally-directed test program to determine mission capability rates if adequate supplies

and depot level repairables are

available.

The Guard's second bomber

wing, the 116th FW, GA, ANG,

began initial planning for conversion with a facility site survey

accomplished at the future site of

Robins AFB, Georgia. Special

emphasis has been placed on the

improvement of the B-1B internal

electronic countermeasures systems and imart bomb" capability

by HQ Air Combat Command.

F- IS EAGLE. The continued

modification of ANG F-15A/B aircraft through the Multi-Stage

Improvement Program (MSIP)

resulted in the increased capability of the Air Guard to meet any

contingency. All ANG F-15 units

will be converted to MSIP capability by FY95/3. The contract

field team at Otis ANGB,

Massachusetts continued to provide repair support for damaged

F-15 aircraft and equipping aircraft with the ALE-45 countermeasure device.

F-I6 FALCON. The Air

National Guard F-16 fleet participated in Deny Flight operations

in southern Europe in a 'rainbow" coalition of four units. The

150FG, Kirtland AFB, New

Mexico, became operational with

the only Air Guard F-16 C/D Low

Altitude Night Targeting Infrared

Navigation Unit. Phase out of F16 A/B's continued at a rapid

pace with over 100 F-16 A/Bs

retired to the "boneyard".

Modification programs also continued with the high priority

220E engine safety upgrade. The

158th Fighter Group, Burlington,

Vermont, was the first unit to

complete the 220E upgrade.

8 -
A N N U AL R E V I EW OP T H E C HIE F

A-10 WARTHOG. The Air

National Guard A-10 fleet participated in southern Europe with

deployments in operations Deny

Flight and Provide Comfort. The

ANG units "rainbowed" aircraft

with Air Force Reserve units for

successful Provide Comfort operations. The 110FG, Battle Creek,

Michigan, will continue ANG participation in Provide Comfort

deployments to the Bosnia region

of southern Europe. The 175FG,

Baltimore, Maryland achieved an

"outstanding" rating during their

operational readiness inspection

and the 104FG, Barnes ANGB,

Massachusetts, followed by

achieving another "outstanding"

rating by the 9th AF inspector

general. The 104FG has been

selected as a "queen bee" site for

Night Vision modification of ANG

active and AFRES A-10s.

RF/F-4

The Air National Guard RF/F-4

fleet participated in Southwest

Asian deployments. Pending

force structure changes continue

to limit potential modifications.

KC-135 STRATOTANKER.

The Air National Guard (ANG)

fleet of KC-135s has grown to 224

total aircraft at 19 bases, from

Bangor, ME to ickam, l. ANG

tankers were incredibly busy during the past year. We provided all

air refueling support for operation DENY FLIGHT from July

1st, 1994 through November 15th,

1994. ANG Tankers were also

critically involved in operation

RESTORE DEMOCRACY with 16

aircraft at 3 separate locations in

Florida and Puerto Rico.

Throughout the year, Guard KC-
N A T I O N A L G U A R D B U R E A U

135s maintained an alert commit- risk analysis recommended wing versus $4 million in FY94. The

ment at Keflavik NAS, IS and replacement to extend the ser- depot coat accounting system

Geilenkerchen AB, GE. All of this vice life to 45,000 hours. AIC cannot respond quickly enough to

was accomplished with approxi- has put the service life extension keep pace with today's rapidly

mately 30 planes in depot mainte- program on hold awaiting the C- changing fiscal environment.

nance at any time. Another possi- 17. The aging fleet requires fendble limiting maintenance factor ing for sustainent. C-130 HERCULES. TheAir

was the mandatory inspection of National Guard continues to the

all electricity driven fuel pumps. C-5 CALAXv. The C-5 pro- lead the way with the Air Force's

This inspection was the result vides capability for rapid deploy largest fleet of C-13O's. In 1994,

of the aircraft explosion at ment of forces during conflict, Hercules units deployed to seven

Milwaukee in December 1993. crisis response, and disasters as major regions around the world

All aircraft have been inspected well as strategic delivery of cargo supporting national interests

and made safe. and passengers primaily via as an equal partner in the

air/land operations. It is the oniy Total Force.

C-141 STARLIFTER. The DoD aircraft capabe of outsize

C-141 provides capability for cargo until the C-17 is fielded. There are currentiy H mission W3

rapid deployment of forces dur- directed modifications, upgrading

ing conflict, crisis response, and Overall depot flow times are vanous parts of the avionics and

disasters. This year the ANG high and often take significantly defensive systems to include

has fulfilled this role in Bosnia longer than scheduled. The SA- adding the Global Positioning

and Operation UPHOLD ALC has heen forced to reflow System. These missions will

DEMOCRACY, as well as their production schedule assure continued combat capahilinumerous med-evac missions. because they cannot produce ty in these days of shrinking

aircraft on schedule. This has defense dollars. However, proAircraft structural integrity resuited in the PDM interval for jected force structure changes

problems limit C-141 capability. three of the 105 AG's aircraft and additional units are havins

The original service life was being pushed out beyond the 60 a negative impact on the Guard

30,000 hours. Currently, the ANG month standard to 7172, end 76 program. These new units, along

C-141 fleet averages about 35,000. months. Engineering approval with congressional additions in

Reliability and maintainability has been granted for this exten- various states, have produced a

modifications are necessary to sion. This reduces annual PDM noticesble shortfall in support

keep the C-141 fleet mission capa- requirements from three to two equipment Without these critical

ble. Center wing box replacement and improves aircraft availability assets, C-130 conversion prois one sustainment program at the 105th. Depot costs contin- grams may lose momentum

underway. The Scientific us to-skyrocket. The cost of a

Advisory Board and Lockheed PM in FY96 will be $6 million
A N N U A L R E V I E W O F T H E C H I E F

Aircraft Support

Equipment

smoother conversions to the

reserve forces in the future.

Nuclear, Biological,

and Chemical (NBC)

The overall change in world The Base Reslignment sod

threats continues to result in Closure lsws hsve hsd an impsct The establishment of the

conversions within the ANG from on the redistribution of mission Consolldsted Mobility Bsg

fighters to the refueling, airlift equipment to the ARC. The locsl Control Center (CMBCC will

and transporting aircraft. Critical community has priority over redoce the chemical warfare

support equipment is not avail- equipment not required by the defense equipment requirements

able for converting units. Short owning command or their ARC at base and unit level from 4 to 2

notice conversions, funding con- gained units. If soother Msjcom ensembles. Assets are being

straints, long procurement lead or ARC needs the equipment to redistributed to fll the 2 ensem

times, new aircraft entering the support conversions or existing ble requirements sod the excess

inventory without proper identifi- shortages, they are third in the will go to the CMBCC. The

cation of installed systems, and priority order. CMBCC (managed by HO ACC

the impact of base closure laws at Avon Park FL and Beale

have all contributed to the cur- AFB, CA) will store the other 2

rent lack of equipment at con- Other Equipment ensembles for quick consolidated

verting units. The impact of support to deployed areas.

these situations result in more Shortages of flak vests, Kevlar

in-house loans and high cost helmets, sod Desert (B-Bag) bag

work-arounds. components continue to exist due Transportation to funding constraints at base,

Air Reserve Component (ARC) MAJCOM, and Air Force levels. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE

conversions to older aircraft AND OPERATIONS. TheANG

from active duty wings continue saved in excess of three million

to cause shortages because units Training Equipment dollars in new vehicle acquisition

are not co-located with similar costs by obtaining 28 special-puraircraft in a wing structure. On The lack of support equipment pose vehicles declared from Air

an active duty base, one piece of for mission requirements impacts Force inventories in the United

equipment can support 48 to 60 overall training at converting Kingdom. This, coupled with the

aircraft. When the aircraft are units. When loans are not avail- upcoming acquisition of 20 addiredistributed within the ARC to 7 able, expensive work-arounds tonal heavy equipment/constmcor more units, there are insuffi- must be negotiated to send per- ton vehicles from active bases in

cient assets to go around. The sounel TDY to soother location Germany, will save an estimated

active forces have recently start- or expend transportation funds to 3.5 million dollars and enhance

ed to equip larger aircraft per ship equipment back sod forth ANG civil engineer, rapid rway

squadron versus wing, creating between usinglowning units and repair and regional equipment

increased support and enabling the converting units operator training capability.

84
N A T I O N A L G U A D B N U R E A U

The ANG successfully negotiated for 40-K aircraft loader

asset capability in support of special mission requirements of the

151st Air Refueling Group. In

addition, branch personnel completed an audit of fuel trucks for

ANG flying units, validated a

requirement for 50 new refueling

assets, and began procurement of

50 new general-purpose vehicles

in support of the ANG's communications mission.

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT.

Recognizing outdated position

descriptions at field units, branch

personnel standardized technician position descriptions for

both traffic manager and packer/woodworker positions at all

locations. This resulted in 85

traffic manager positions being

upgraded from GS-08 to GS-09,

and three from GS-08 to GS-11,

with approved exceptions. The

new packer/woodworker position

description culminated in 88 position upgrades, for a total of 176

upgrade actions for ANG traffic

management flights. In addition,

a Functional Area Manpower

Review of all ANG traffic management activities was accomplished. The review covered

workload requirements for

surface freight, packaging and

passenger sections and culminated in a net gain of 34 personnel.

The Cargo Movement

Operations System (CMOS)

implementation was accelerated

from FY98 to FY94 to automate

freight processing capabilities

and to provide in-transit cargo

visibility at all ANG activities.

Implementation started in May

1994 at McEntire ANG Base, SC.

To date, CMOS has been installed

at 13 locations, with plans to proceed with three or four units

each month until completion.

Hazardous Material training

has required extensive NGB

involvement in both determining

and obtaining training requirements. Resident initial and twoyear refresher training, at formal

schools, is required for ANG personnel whose primary duty is

preparing, certifying or inspecting hazardous materials.

Requirements were processed

and validated for over 650 personnel assigned to 93 geographically separate units. Branch peras
ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE C HIE F

sonnel also oversee hazardous

material preparer and inspector

training for over 2,090 ANG

aerial port personnel at 24

separate locations.

The ANG Readiness Center is

in the process of replacing 463L

pallet and net assets that were

lost and not recovered during the

Gulf War. Units started receiving

new assets in May 1994.

The Air Force created a 'naillike matter" program to increase

the movement velocity of materials classified SECRET and below,

based on a successful Federal

Bureau of Investigation test using

Federal Express, with zero losses. In effect, material is not treated as classified while in transit,

but is overpacked at origin and

moved incognito as general

cargo. ANG units will receive, but

will not ship, classified material

using the new procedure until the

test is completed. If successful,

the program will be expanded to

include all Air Force sponsored

cargo. All 93 ANG traffic management functions are in the

process of obtaining Federal

Express Power Ship capability in

preparation for implementation.

ENGINEERING

AND SERVICES

Facility Operations

and Maintenance

Facilities operation and maintenance activities were budgeted at

$145.5 million for FY94. This program pays salaries for firefighters, real property and forces

required to support facility operation and maintenance as well as

utilities, minor maintenance and

repair projects and supplies

required to extend the useful life

of our facilities. Conversions to

larger aircraft and aging facilities

are increasing our overall maintenance requirements.

Real Property

Maintenance

and Repair

Maintenance and repair projects,

as well as minor construction

projects costing up to

$300,000.00 each, are accomplished under this program. $42.5

million was expended in FY94.

Military Construction

The FY94 ANG Military

Construction Program consisted

of 129 building projects totaling

$236.8 million for major facility

construction to support aircraft

conversions, new mission

requirements and environmental

improvement. The government

rescissions to support national

emergencies such as the

California earthquake disaster

and foreign conflicts resulted in

a funding of $226.4 million. Fifty

percent of the MILCON program

was awarded for construction

within the fiscal year funded by

Congress. Increased participation

this year with the special small

business programs of the Small

Business Administration has

shown that the ANG has awarded

about 20 percent of its awarded

program thusfar to 8(a) contractors and another 20 percent of its

program to small disadvantaged

business contractors.

CIVIL

ENGINEERING

Facility Operations

and Maintenance

Activities

The Facility Operations and

Maintenance Activities (FOMA)

program pays salaries for firefighters, real property, and forces

86
N A T 1 0 N A

required to support facility operation and maintenance, utilities,

minor maintenance and repair

projects, and supplies required

to extend the useful life of ANG

facilities. At the end of FY94,

the funding for the FOMA program stood at $145.5 million.

ANG conversions to larger aircraft, including both B-Bs and

KC-135s, and the constantly

increasing age of all ANG facilities have increased the overall

maintenance requirements.

Military Construction

Despite numerous public

announcements about personnel

and budget cuts in defense

spending, the average budget for

military construction (MILCON)

in the Air National Guard

reached all time highs. The

MILCON budget for the past

three years was as follows:

- FY 1992..........$217.3 million

* FY 1993 . $287.6 million

* FY 1994..........$2413 million

The budgeted figure was

reduced $6.2 million below the

original $247.5 million appropriated by Congress. The 1994 figure

included $226A million for major

construction, $4 million for

unspecified minor construction,

and $10.9 million for planning

and design. The appropriated

amount for FY 1995, which began

1 October 1994, was $249 million,

reduced by $0.465 million, leaving

$248.6 million for use during this

fiscal year.

87

G U A R D B U R E A U
A N N U A L R EV I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

Deployments

ANG Civil Engineer Prime BEEF

and RED HORSE teams accomplished 133 deployments, involving nearly 8,000 personnel, to

military bases in the United

States as well as to 12 other

countries in FY94.

Forty-four teams participated

in warskills training at the Silver

Flag Exercise Site (SFES),

Tyndall AFB, FL. The SFES provides crew size exercises leading

to task certification for Civil

Engineer personnel filling critical

Unit Type Code (UTC) positions

on a Prime BEEF team. Fifteen

teams deployed to active Air

Force bases, directly supporting

repair and construction project

requirements throughout the

United States, Europe, and

the Pacific.

Sixteen teams deployed to

Central and South America, primarily accomplishing

Humanitarian and Civic Action

(HCA) projects, such as constructing a cholera treatment

clinic in Pacara, Argentina and

building a six room school in El

Christal, Panama. Projects directly supporting VOLANT

OAK/CORONET NIGHTHAWK

were also accomplished.

Twelve teams deployed to

Canada, Norway, and the United

Kingdom as part of the ongoing

ANG data exchange program.

Civil Engineer exchanges with

America's allies continued to

provide outstanding opportunities

for training in Rapid Runway

Repair (RRR) techniques, as

well as host unique construction

methods and materials. These

deployments also served to

strengthen relationships with

these important allies.

Twenty-two teams deployed to

ANG bases, directly supporting

ANG facility repair and construction programs. Three of these

teams continued to provide flood

relief to the 139th Airlift Group

in St. Louis, Missouri, which was

still recovering from when the

MVissouri River flooded with nine

feet of water on July 25, 1993.

Five teams deployed to Army

National Guard camps, supporting the project requests of several adjutant generals.

Additionally, over 70 teams of

12-15 firefighters deployed to

active Air Force bases in the

United States, Europe and the

Pacific. ANG firefighters also

participated in warskills training

at Tyndall AFB, FL.

Environmental

Supporting the four pillars of the

environment continued to be the

goal of the Air National Guard

during FY94. Continuing education maintained its focus as the

primary means of improving

environmental awareness and

expertise. Courses in environmental risk communications as

well as initial and continuing

technical education classes and

conferences were paramount in

providing the necessary information to foster increased environmental efforts and advances in

the field. Implementation of an

ANG environmental awards program resulted in recognition of

units and individuals in the areas

of environmental quality compliance pollution prevention. Three

of the winners will represent the

ANG in the FY95 USAF

Environmental Awards

Competition.

ASSESSMENTS. In FY94 the

Air Guard continued managing

two environmental impact statements in support of aircraft and

special use airspace. A third EIS

was started for a major land

acquisition for the expansion of

the Hardwood air-to-ground

range along with the modification

and addition to special use airspace within the area.

a
N A T I O N A L G U A D B N U R E A U

During FY94, the Air Guard construction and base expansion

contracted for 20 environmental as required by the National

assessments (EA) for force struc- Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

ture changes and other major and completing Environmental

actions. The Air Guard continues Base Surveys (EBS) for real

to be actively completing EAs for property transfers to ensure liability for contamination is

addressed. With the addition of

full-time environmental coordinators at unit level during FY92/93,

more EAs and EBSs are now

being completed at unit level.

AIRSPACE. The Central/Great

Lakes Region has several ongoing airspace actions that are a

result of many unit aircraft conversions. In addition, there is an

environmental impact statement

(EIS) in progress for a proposed

expansion of Hardwood Gunnery

Range, Wisconsin, and two

military training routes. The

Southern Region is hosting

an EIS for the proposed B-1

conversion at Dobbins AFB

Georgia, and related airspace

in the region.

The Airspace Management

Branch coordinated the effort

that led to the formation of the

Interagency Airspace/Natural

Resources Coordination Group

(IANRCG). The IANRCG has

promoted communications

between the Department of

Defense and federal land management agencies.

There are several airspace

actions currently being pursued

by the Airspace Management

Branch. In the Northeast, the Air

National Guard recently supportas
A N N U A L R E vIE w O F TH E C H IE F

ed FAA meetings in Vermont,

New Hampshire and Maine. In

the Northwest, final modifications

are being made to the draft EIS

for the Colorado Airspace

Initiative. Draft hearings are

expected in the spring of 1995.

The Western/Pacific Regional

Airspace Committee was recently

formed, completing a five-year

process to regionalize airspace

management and planning across

the entire country.

RESTORATION. The Air

National Guard Installation so Restoration Program (IRP) executed $26.8 million in FY94 for

investigative studies and cleanup.

Total requirements for FY94

were nearly $90 million for priority 1 and priority 2 projects.

Priority 1 requirements totaled

nearly $45 million. Current DOD

and Air Force guidance allows

funding of priority 1 projects only.

COMPLIANCE/POLLUTION

PREVENTION. The most significant indicator of the efforts set

forth in the compliance area is

the number of open enforcement

actions levied by regulatory agencies. The Air National Guard has

cut this number in half since

FY92. We have continued to

decrease the enforcement action

from 62 in FY92 to less than 30

by the end of FY94. While this

indicates how regulatory agencies

view the Air Guard, the number

of ECAMP audits, spill plans, and

waste management documents

have increased proportionally. In

FY94, 33 ECAMP audits were

conducted. This is up 25 percent

from FY92. The support of field

units in the spill response planning area has also increased from

11 based in FY92 to over 15 in

FY94 and is expected to be over

35 in FY95. In FY94 the Air

Guard conducted air emission

studies at several installations in

preparation for the Air

Compliance Title V requirements

expected for FY95.

SECURITY

During the "year of training,"

ANG security police were very

active in training for their

wartime missions. Security police

units continue to train with Air

Combat Command at Silver Flag

Alpha, Indian Springs Airfield

Nevada, enhancing their air base

defense skills to operate in a

combat environment. In 1994 44-

person air base defense units

completed training at Silver Flag

Alpha with 32 units scheduled for

training in 1995. Security Police

personnel are now actively participating in Joint Readiness

Training Exercises (JRTC). JRTC

provides light forces realistic

combat training in a low to medium intensity conflict. Army, Air

Force, Marine, and Reserve

Component forces replicate a

deployed Joint Task Force (JTF).

The realistic training provided at

JRTC affords commanders an

excellent opportunity to train

both their air and ground forces

in a combat environment. The

combination of realism and

specifically designed scenarios

provides valuable lessons learned

in a training environment which

makes JRTC unique among

today's list of training alternatives. Our goal is to ensure our

units receive the finest combat

training available in peacetime.

In 1994 one ANG security police

unit attended JRTC and three

units are scheduled to attend in

1995. During 1994 security police

were called upon to provide support and protection during

declared states of emergency due

to severe floods in Georgia and

Texas. Other security forces participated in Air Force exercises

and missions throughout the

United States, Europe and Asia.
N A T I 0 N A U

COUNTERDRUG The Air National Guard baa Accordinglywe are seeking

DIRECTORATE been asked by the Air Force to increased staffing and funding.

operate a new couoterdrug interDuring Fiscal Year 1994, the Air cept-tracker aircraft for Military Public Health and

National Guard took delivery of USSOUTHCOM. This program Bloenvironmental Engineering

the first of ten counterdrug C-26 will uae apecially modified Cessna Services manpower studies idenOperational Support Aircraft Citations, staging out of Howard tified & additional fulitime manmodified with state-of-the-art AFB, Panama, and will greatiy power requirements. Position

sensors to support law enforce- enhance SOUTHCOM's ability deacriptions have been upgraded

ment at the state and local level to intercept and track suspected to reflect the elevated scope

in conducting counterdrug opera- drug-smuggling aircraft in the and reaponsibitiea of these

tions under the Governor's State northweatem part of South positions. However, recruiting

Plans Program. America. The first flight of qualified people remains an

In supporting the Air Forceaircraft if gig challenge.

nsptn the Airrten orefne projected to be in the late spring The ANG refined and

and the Department of Defense o 96

in OCONUS counterdrug opera- enhanced the environmental

tions, Air National Guard person- budget processtbrough the

nel continue to fulfill its commit- implementation of more compment to support two ground MEDICAL rehensive reporting. Also,

mobile radars in Colombia as part environmental and pollution

of USCINCSOUTH's "Steady prevention funds are now

State" operation. In addition, Air Formuiting and directing execu- available, and newly completed

National Guard F-16 air defense ton of ANG medical policies and studies have identified requirefighters continue to be the only programs is the task of the NGB menta for supplies, equipment

DoD asset to maintain an around- air surgeon and the director of computers and contract services.

the-clock, 15 minute alert posture medical services, Ar National

for intercepting potential drug Guard Readineas Center.

smugglers attempting to enter Aeromedical

the United States from Central Evacuation

and South America. In FY94 Occupational and Operations

ANG fighters have intercepted Community

over 60 such aircraft and assisted Environments

law enforcement in several suc- was intense, requiring an inordi

cessful seizures of large quanti- Federal and state guidelines and nate call for volunteers. Mission

ties of cocaine, regulations continue to become requirementa approached levels

more complex, oversight more reached during OPERATION

stringent and non-compliance DESERT SHIELD/STORM. By

penalties more severe a April 15th, 101 persounel repreS; I

G U A R D B U R E A U
A N N U A L R E V I E W 0 F T H E C H I E F

senting all 10 Air National Guard

aeromedical evacuation units had

served in Mogadishu, Somalia,

and Cairo West, Egypt, in support

of OPERATION RESTORE

HOPE. Relative to OPERATION

SUPPORT HOPE, the Rawandan

relief effort, personnel and their

respective equipment packages

from three units were ready for

deployment within 24 hours of

the Air Combat Command (ACC)

request. Personnel were also

involved in varying degrees with

other global operations, including

OPERATION SEA SIGNAL, the

Haitian relocation effort, OPERATION DISTANT HAVEN, the

establishment of temporary protective facilities for Haitian

migrants, and OPERATION

UPHOLD DEMOCRACY, the

Haitian Operations action in

which personnel and equipment

from five units deployed.

The final significant operation

was in response to Iraq's

renewed threat north of Kuwait's

border. Although OPERATION

VIGILANT WARRIOR was of

relatively short duration, AE

crews from several units were

ready for deployment, as well as

personnel to support the Air

Combat Command battlestaff.

ANG AE personnel continue to

demonstrate their extremely

important role in total force contingency operations.
N A T I O N A L G U A R D B U R E A U

Medical Operations

The ANG directorate of medical

services was the lead agent in a

deployment to the Ukraine, the

first time ANG medical personnel

had served on Ukrainian soil. A

medical team deployed to treat

Afghan war veterans, Chernobyl

nuclear reactor accident victims,

and other individuals in need of

medical care. This operation was

conducted jointly with personnel

of the Ukrainian military. In all,

1600 patients were treated during

this humanitarian mission.

The ANG medical community

enhanced medical readiness by

demonstrating the ability to function in austere environments in

several world-wide locations:

Tondibiah, Africa; Soto Cano,

Hondurus and Belarus. In Nigeria

alone, 3,492 people were given

treatment for a myriad of ailments ranging from malnutrition

and malaria to tuberculosis, polio

and syphilis. ANG medical personnel strive to maintain a highly

trained quality force for peacetime and wartime missions.

ANG participation in GUARDCARE USA, the NGB program to

utilize Guard medical personnel

to provide diagnostic and referral

services in medically-underserved communities, increased

dramatically. A parallel, but distinct congressionally-mandated

and funded initiative is called the

Civil-Military Cooperative

Program. Under the direction of

the assistant secretary of defense

for reserve affairs, the ANG

medical service designed several

pilot exercises to be executed in

the near future. Designated

"CAREFORCE", these readiness

training exercises will expand

GUARDCARE USA to focus on

the casualty/trauma aspects of

disaster/emergency contingency

peacetime operations. For Guard

personnel, CAREFORCE will provide a platform for the establishment of an on-going integration

with local and state emergency/

disaster response agencies, as

well as institutionalizing a significant protocol for readiness

warshill sustainment training.

Two new training programs

were implemented at Kingsley

Field to complement TOP

KNIFE, the school for ANG flight

surgeons. TOP DRILL, for ANG

dentists, and TOP EYE, for ANG

optometrists, are designed to elevate the student's appreciation of

the unique and physically

demanding environment imposed

on aircrews of fighter aircraft.

This enhanced awareness enables

these health care providers to

practice improved preventive,

diagnostic, and treatment

services.

New Policy Guidance

To protect all civilian technicians

and military personnel from the

health hazards caused by exposure to tobacco smoke, effective

July 1994 a no smoking policy

was implemented at all ANG

workplaces.

In accordance with the FY

DOD Appropriations Act the

service secretaries now may

authorize a pro-rated retirement

qualification for members of the

Select Reserve who have attained

more than 15 but less than 20

years of creditable service.

93
1-

LA c~ u ii~: ~i~j ~ I] @ ~
APPENDIX A

CHIEFS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU

Colonel Erasmus M. Weaver..............................................................................1908-1911

Brigadier General Robert K. Evans ................................................................. 1911-1912

Major General Albert L. Mills ............................................................................ 1912-1916

Major General William A. Mann ....................................................................... 1916-1917

Major General Jessie McL Carter.....................................................................1917-1918

Brigadier General John W. Heavey (acting) .................................................... 1918-1919

Major General George C. Rickards..................................................................1921-1925

Major General Creed C. Hammond..................................................................1925-1929

Colonel Ernest R. Redmond (acting)................................................................1929-1929

Major General William G. Everson ................................................................. 1929-1931

Major General George E. Leach ...................................................................... 1931-1935

Colonel Harold J. Weiler (acting).....................................................................1935-1936

Colonel John F. Williams (acting).....................................................................1936-1936

Major General Albert H. Blanding ................................................................. 1936-1940

96 Major General John F. Williams ...................................................................... 1940-1946

Major General Butler B. Miltonberger...........................................................1946-1947

Major General Kenneth F. Cramer ................................................................. 1947-1950

Major General Raymond H. Fleming (acting) ................................................ 1950-1951

Major General Raymond H. Fleming...............................................................1951-1953

Major General Earl T. Ricks (acting) ............................................................. 1953-1953

Major General Edgar C. Erickson...................................................................1953-1959

Major General Winston P. Wilson (acting).....................................................1959-1959

Major General Donald W. McGowan ............................................................. 3.959-1963

Major General Winston P. Wilson ................................................................... 1963-1971

Major General Francis S. Greenlief.................................................................1971-1974

Lieutenant General La Vern E. Weber ............................................................ 1974-1982

Lieutenant General Emmett H. Walker, Jr....................................................982-1986

Lieutenant General Herbert R. Temple, Jr. ................... 1986-1990

Lieutenant General John B. Conaway ....................................................... 1990-Dec 93

Major General Philip G. Killey (acting) ................................................. Dec 93-Jan 94

Major General Raymond F. Rees (acting)................................................Jan 94-Jul 94

Major General John R. DAraujo, Jr. (acting)..........................................Jul 94-Sep 94
VICE CHIEFS

Major General John B. Conaway ..................................................................... 1989-1990

Major General William A. Navas, Jr................................................................1990-1992

Major General Raymond F. Rees.. 1000.1OOA

APPENDIX B - STATE ADJUTANTS GENERAL

AL Major General James E. Moore

AK Major General Hugh L. Cox mU

AZ Major General Donald L. Owens

AR Major General (AR) Melvin C. Thrash

CA Major General Tandy K. Bozeman

co Major General John L. France

CT Major General (CT) David W. Gay

DE Major General George K. Hastings

Dc Major General Russell C. Davis

FL Major General Ronald 0. Harrison

GA Major General William P. Bland

Gu Brigadier General Edvardo R. Duenas

HI Major General Edward V. Richardson

it Major General Darrell V. Manning

IL Major General Donald W. Lynn

IN Major General Charles W. Whitaker

IA Major General Warren G. Lawson

KS Major General James F. Reuger

KY Major General Robert L. Dezarn

LA Major General (LA) Ansel M. Stroud, Jr.

ME Major General Nelson E. Durgin

N D Major General James F. Fretterd

MA Major General (MA) Raymond F. Vezina

mI I Major General E. Gordon Stump

MN Major General Eugene R. Andreotti

Ms Major General James H. Garner

Mo Major General (MO) Raymond L.

Pendergrass

MT Major General (MT) John E. Prendergast

NE Major General Stanley M. Heng

NV Major General Drennan A. Clark

NH Major General Lloyd M. Price

NJ Major General Vito Morgano

NM Major General Edward D. Baca

NY Major General Michael S. Hall

NC Major General (NC) Gerald A. Rudisill

ND Brigadier General Keith D. Bjerke

OH Major General Richard A. Alexander

OK Major General Gary D. Maynard

oR Brigadier General Gene A. Katke

PA Major General (PA) Gerald T. Sajer

PR Major General (PR) Emilio Diaz Colon

RI Major General N. Andre Trudeau (CG)

sc Major General (SC) T. Eston Marchant, Jr.

sD Major General Harold J. Sykora

TN Major General (TN) William D. Jones

TX Major General Sam C. Turk

UT Major General John L. Mathews

VT Major General Donald E. Edwards

VA Major General (VA) Carroll Thackston

VI Major General Charles M. Hood

WA Major General Gregory P. Barlow

wV Major General Joseph J. Skaff

wI Major General Jerald P. Slack

WY Major General Charles J. Wing

9i7
APPENDIX C - UNITED STATES PROPERTY

AND FISCAL. OFFICERS

STATE NAME

AL Col Marion W. Reese

AK Col Russell E. Gillespie

AZ Col James E. Burnes

AR Col Charles E. Henry

CA Col John R. Alexander

co Col Conrad A. Johnson

CT Col Robert B. Devoe

DE Col Anthony F. Barbone

DC Col Robert B. Kirkconnell

FL Col Donald E. Power

GA Col David S. Kenemer

Gu LTC Arthur A. Jackson

HI Col Melvin M. Ida

ID Col Rex T. Young

IL Col John W. Newman

IN Col Allan W. Pierce

IA Col James E. McCullough

KS Col Dennis L. Elliott

KY LTC Michael A. Jones

LA Col James D. Flick

ME Col Dennis D. Lunney

MD Col Walter R. Mueller

MA Col Anthony C. Spadorcia

MI Col George E. Higginson

MN Col Charles W. Andres

Ms Col Sonny D. Jones

Mo Col Allen L. Stark

STATE NAME

MT Col George E. Donnelly

NE Col Stephen R. Robinson

NV Col Giles E. Vanderhoof

NH Col Teddy W. Kehr

NJ Col Kenneth W. Whilden

NM Col Isaac A. Alvarado

NY Col Frank Polis

NC Col Ronnie D. Creasman

ND Col Donald M. Huber

oH Col Richard J. Dreiman

OK Col Robert C. Armstrong

OR Col Gary L. Pedersen

PA Col Allen L. Kifer

PR Col Jose Maldonado

RI Col John B. Altieri

sc Col Donald K. Meetze

SO Col Jerry F. Hoenke

TN Col Donald H. Glover

TX Col Donald M. Swayze

uT Col Bart 0. Davis

VT Col Joseph A. Fiarkoski

VA Col David L. Bishop

VI Col James P. Adams

WA Col Curtis N. Pintler

wv LTC Richard L. Dillon

wI Col Howard D. Miller

WY Col Richard D. Sherman
APPENDIX D - NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU STAFF

Office of the Chief

D'Araujo, John R. Jr., Major General, ARNGUS, Acting Chief, National Guard Bureau

Bryan, John M., Colonel, ANGUS, Executive

Spahr, David K., Major, ANGUS, Assistant Executive

Link, Thomas L., Assistant Chief

Barnhart, Robert W., Chief, Internal Review and Audit Compliance

Bray, Francis J., Director, Counterdrug Task Force

Broderick, Jack E., Director, Equal Opportunity

Byrd, H. Cronin, Acting Inspector General

Cable, Vincent L., Colonel, ARNGUS, Chief, Policy and Liaison

Carroll, Michael G., LTC, USA, Principals Assistant Responsible for Contracting

Donohue, Daniel, Chief, Public Affairs

Farber, Brad, Colonel, ARNGUS, Judge Advocate

Gilmore, Deborah, Chief, Administrative Services

Hise, James C., Counsel to Chief, National Guard Bureau

Mackert, William C., Assistant for Property and Fiscal Affairs and Special Competition Advocate

Nelson, Steve, Director, Human Resources

Renfroe, A. Vance, Colonel, ANGUS, Director, International Initiatives

Army National Guard

D'Araujo, John R., Jr., MG, ARNGUS, Director

Bilo, William C., Brigadier General, ARNGUS, Deputy Director

Sahlin, Carl T. Jr., Colonel, USA, Executive

Henderson, Rich, Lieutenant Colonel, ARNGUS, Assistant Executive

Pence, Larry D., Command Sergeant Major, ARNGUS, Enlisted Advisor

Rhoades, Kenneth D., Colonel, ARNGUS, Chief of Staff

Stohla, Stephan A., Lieutenant Colonel, ARNGUS, Chief, Facilities Management Office,

ARNG Readiness Center

Braman, Eric W., Colonel, ARNGUS, Director of Operations, Training, and Readiness

Crocker, William R., Colonel, USA, Director of Logistics

Denny, Morgan F, Colonel, USA, Comptroller

Ferrera, Joseph L., Colonel, ARNGUS, Director of Aviation and Safety

Frankland, Donald R., Colonel, ARNGUS, Director of Engineering

Hobgood, James L., Colonel, ARNGUS, Acting Director, Information Systems

Hollenbeck, Douglas B., Colonel, ARNGUS, Chief, Research and Staff Support Office
Mayfield, Maurice J., Colonel, ARNGUS, Director of Force Management

Ries, Arthur W.II, Colonel, ARNGUS, Director, Operational Support Airlift Project

(Ft. Belvoir, VA)

Sanfason, David B., Colonel, ARNGUS, Commandant, Professional Education Center

(Little Rock, AR)

Spence, Philip W, Colonel, ARNGUS, Director of Environmental Programs

Tipa, Ronald J., Colonel, ARNGUS, Director of Personnel

Air National Guard

Shepperd, Donald W, Major General, ANGUS, Director

Weaver, Paul A. Jr., Brigadier General, ANGUS, Deputy Director

Kimmel, Paul S., Colonel, USAF, Staff Director

Hartman, Gene, Special Assistant to the Director

Brown, Edwin B., Chief Master Sergeant, ANGUS, Enlisted Advisor

Arnold, Larry K., Brigadier General, ANGUS, Commander, Air National Guard Readiness Center

Athas, William J., Colonel, ANGUS, Director of Training

Baker, David E., Colonel, USAF, Director for Operations, Plans and Programs

Clark, Ernest S., Colonel, ANGUS, Director of Operations

loo Ellington, John B. Jr., Lieutenant Colonel, ANGUS, Chaplain

Foulois, Bill, Colonel, USA, Director of Logistics

Friestad, David, Colonel, ANGUS, Director of Counterdrug Operations

Gallimore, George R., Colonel, USAF, Co-Director of Financial Management/Comptroller

Goss, William B., Colonel, ANGUS, Director of Plans, Programs, and Manpower

Hoffmaster, Jan, Colonel, ANGUS, Director of Security

Joyce, Richard J., Colonel, USAF, Co-Director for Command, Control, Communications

and Computers

Labash, John D., Colonel, USAF, Director of Medical Services

Kean, Gerald S., Colonel, ANGUS, Director of Personnel

Lesjak, Kathleen D., Colonel, ANGUS, Director of Productivity and Quality

Lundgren, Samel G., Colonel, USAF, Director of Engineering and Services

McNamara, Robert, Colonel, ANGUS, Co-Director for Command, Control, Conmmunications

and Computers

Nielsen, Dennis, Colonel, USAF, Director of Safety

Scobey, David L., Colonel, ANGUS, Director, Staff Management Office

Sirk, Arnold E., Colonel, USAF, Director of Logistics

Templon, Frances L., Colonel, USAF, Co-Director of Financial Management/Comptroller
APPENDIX E

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

AL

AZ

AR

CA

co

CT

DE

FL

GA

ID

IL

IN

IA

KS

KY

LA

ME

MD

MA

MI

MN

Ms

mo

MT

NE

NV

NHNJ

NM

NY

NC

ToTAL FUNDS

AVAILABLE

$105,987

$48,530

$76,403

$189,113

$33,547

$55,193

$16,676

$76,744

$73,185

$55,766

$55,252

$78,303

$61,261

$53,245

$48,594

$74,875

$23,465

$41,248

$55,657

$70,744

$70,673

$146,869

$83,880

$29,254

$31,543

$17,934

$15,075

$58,069

$32,069

$88,419

$71,775

APPROPRIATIONS

NGPA

$35,657

$14,543

$23,920

$49,563

$9,849

$7,062

$4,560

$27,730

$20,252

$10,219

$17,619

$21,686

$14,562

$12,810

$16,223

$24,968

$8,219

$15,464

$15,609

$21,847

$17,741

$29,790

$19,083

$8,508

$10,260

$4,112

$3,613

$14,991

$10,669

$26,681

$20,197

OMNG

$63,531

$33,987

$42,014

$138,945

$23,698

$48,131

$12,116

$49,014

$52,933

$39,137

$34,022

$39,584

$36,774

$31,127

$32,371

$49,907

$15,246

$25,784

$37,492

$48,897

$45,011

$117,079

$62,058

$20,202

$21,283

$13,822

$11,462

$43,078

$21,400

$61,738

$51,018

MCNG

$6,798

$10,469

$605

$6,410

$3,611

$17,033

$9,926

$9,308

$2,556

$7,921

$2,740

$545

$560

lot
TOTAL FUNDS

AVAILABLE NGPA OMNG MCNG

NO $31,496 $8,694 $18,140 $4,662

oH $62,803 $18,324 $44,479

OK $54,593 $17,158 $37,435

OR $51,419 $16,933 $34,321 $165

PA $95,874 $31,583 $64,291

RI $18,567 $5,358 $13,209

sc $73,709 $26,208 $46,551 $950

SD $31,055 $7,554 $17,960 $5,541

TN $81,003 $24,722 $47,992 $8,289

TX $127,314 $37,095 $79,486 $10,734

UT $50,849 $19,115 $29,771 $1,964

VA $49,189 $15,263 $33,926

VT $31,569 $7,744 $19,044 $4,781

WA $56,015 $17,015 $37,360 $1,640

wv $25,795 $8,017 $17,778

wi $62,503 $16,208 $34,034 $12,261

wY $21,013 $4,605 $13,478 $2,930

1c $16,467 $5,158 $11,309

GU $5,856 $2,073 $1,972 $1,811

HI $28,342 $7,752 $20,155 $435

AK $32,308 $6,878 $25,430

PR $49,291 $20,696 $28,595

vI $10,074 $2,239 $7,835

op* $2,583,692 $2,583,692

UN* $144,362 $513 $0 $143,849

AC* $34,173 $34,173

mw* $163,205 $3,423 $159,783

RC* $27,317 $27,317

$5,959,202 $3,452,025 $2,228,684 $278,493

*OP OPEN ALLOTMENT UN UNDISTRIBUTED

AC ACIRC SUPPORT mw MDW Rc RCAS
APPENDIX F

AIR NATIONAL GUARD STATISTICS

Table 1. ANG Issues by State

FC30 PC58

STATE AF O&M ANG OM

AK 111,100 49,501,200

AL 925,700 47,663,400

AR 11,000 36,789,842

AZ 31,000 89,550,400

CA 231,500 93,607,000

CO 314,200 37,598,900

CT 0 21,975,600

DC 1,324,000 30,505,500

DE O 15,103,900

FL 28,000 26,240,700

GA 30,600 55,042,600

GU 0 277,900

HI 0 58,778,800

IA 93,300 46,522,000

ID 0 39,419,400

IL 134,600 64,987,700

IN 73,400 43,099,100

KS 110,000 65,567,700

KY 38,800 17,787,303

LA 42,400 33,343,500

MA 1,925,900 70,014,200

MD 1,925,900 33,041,200

ME 0 23,129,700

MI 62,600 85,978,350

MN 11,500 43,074,945

MO 41,300 60,033,400

MS 0 50,791,600

MT 151,5900 26,081,735

NC 0 19,436,211

FC68

ANG MILPER

7,214,900

8,530,793

6,561,242

7,758,035

20,352,532

6,178,400

4,691,665

3,859,300

3,888,800

4,189,400

14,053,843

647,900

5,759,500

9,557,810

3,595,300

9,732,019

6;907,200

8,246,254

4,524,700

4,395,200

8,677,107

6,966,672

4,155,053

10,557,824

9,347,000

11,136,400

10,391,427

3,719,210

5,907,800

PC53

MILCON

10,374,400

19,159,193

5,377,138

1,388,800

424,265

1,339,969

550,000

1,750,000

1,529,000

1,029,850

4,619,180

442,300

16,296,558

10,546,130

1,750,000

2,987,600

5,863,154

1,795,052

0

509,137

3,587,633

700,000

326,000

3,337,372

527,890

8,765,947

1,392,772

3,331,500

472,938

FC17 FY94

INVESTMENT TOTAL

8,800 67,210,400

248,600 76,527,686

48,563 48,787,785

0 98,728,235

267,957 114,883,254

33,800 45,465,269

30,400 27,247,665

78,630 37,517,430

12,800 20,534,500

85,925 31,573,875

110,620 73,856,843

0 1,368,100

59,100 80,893,958

48,500 66,767,740

11,700 44,776,400

101,000 77,933,919

127,555 56,070,409

150,000 75,869,006

435,433 22,786,236

29,400 38,319,637

118,200 84,323,040

109,319 40,817,191

67,600 27,678,353

66,900 100,012,046

118,500 53,079,835

266,279 80,243,326

88,929 62,664,728

123,500 33,407,445

33,500 25,850,449

tos
PC30 FCSS

STATE AF O&M ANG O&M

NO 22,900 55,881,900

NE 0 16,802,900

NH 0 22,205,000

NJ 149,100 61,924,500

NM 74,600 27,808,300

NV 165,700 23,275,600

NY 341,000 121,461,072

OH 297,700 123,882,600

OK 18,700 22,098,100

OR 937,700 60,503,100

PA 101,500 63,324,000

PR 526,000 24,623,100

RI 0 19,804,820

SC 22,300 23,030,100

SD 104,900 22,894,800

TN 41,600 67,272,500

TX 0 62,416,980

UT 0 25,093,300

VA 228,100 23,405,400

VT 339,800 28,550,900

WA 27,600 33,175,100

WI 715,900 51,237,283

WV 35,800 32,888,300

WY 0 14,395,600

104

TOTAL

9,843,300 2,312,908,041 392,826,862 181,681,720

CENTR

29,959,600 363,618,859 9,SS2,200

GRTOT

78,554 12,000,000

39,802,900 2,676,526,900 402,379,062 181,760,274

S,060,689

FC56

ANG MILPER

4,185,900

3,209,829

2,547,910

7,417,000

3,121,400

2,890,200

20,475,289

21,917,808

3,402,300

6,653,288

14,270,100

4,272,600

4,315,100

3,559,485

3,627,220

17,025,165

13,813,800

7,335,700

3,538,400

3,704,600

10,063,770

8,589,237

7,350,225

4,037,250

FC53

MILCON

777,927

10,315,854

1,810,000

3,301,263

1,423,448

25,000

5,108,731

5,441,388

467,000

1,450,000

4,090,533

393,000

4,238,000

5,608,900

2,050,000

5,843,317

6,010,107

3,981,397

3,423,900

1,517,100

1,210,742

2,379,335

650,000

0

PC17 FY94

INVESTMENT TOTAL

16,000 60,884,627

142,000 30,470,583

0 26,562,910

51,300 72,843,163

0 32,427,748

104,000 26,460,500

109,600 147,495,692

327,400 151,866,896

131,000 26,117,100

162,400 69,706,488

235,100 82,021,233

0 29,814,700

38,488 28,396,408

11,200 32,231,985

7,800 28,684,720

95,700 90,278,282

147,500 82,388,387

76,200 36,486,597

9,800 30,605,600

17,000 34,129,400

102,400 44,579,612

265,800 63,187,555

33,500 40,957,825

94,991 18,527,841

17,060,689
TABLE 2 - CONVERSIONS, ACTIVATIONS,

INACTIVATIONS, REDESIGNATIONS

Conversions

107 Air Refueling Group, Niagara Falls, NY from 107 Fighter Group ................................ (1 Jul 94)

136 Air Refueling Squadron, Niagara Falls, NY from 136 Fighter Squadron .................... (1 Jul 94)

155 Air Refueling Group, Lincoln, NE from 155 Reconnaissance Group............................(1 Jan 94)

163 Air Refueling Group, March AFB, CA from 163 Reconnaissance................................(1 Oct 93)

171 Airlift Squadron, Selfridge ANGB, MI from 171 Fighter Squadron..............................(15 Jul 94)

173 Air Refueling Squadron, Lincoln, NE from 173 Reconnaissance Squadron................(1 Jan 94)

184 Bomb Group, McConnel AFB, KS from 184 Fighter Group..........................................(15 Jul 94)

191 Airlift Group, Selfridge ANGB, MI from 191 Fighter Group ........................................ (15 Jul 94)

196 Air Refueling Squadron, March AFB, CA from 196 Reconnaissance Squadron.(1 Oct 93)

Activations

118 Airlift Control Flight Nashville MAP, TN..........................................................................(1 Oct 93) 10o

123 Airlift Control Flight, Standiford Field, KY ...................................................................... (1 Oct 93)

133 Airlift Control Flight, Minn/St Paul IAP, MN .................................................................. (1 Oct 93)

136 Airlift Control Flight, Dallas NAS, TX .............................................................................. (1 Oct 93)

137 Airlift Control Flight, Will Rogers World Airport, OK....................................................(1 Oct 93)

146 Airlift Control Flight, Channel Islands ANGS, CA .......................................................... (1 Oct 93)

173 M edical Flight Camp Murray, WA .................................................................................... (1 M ar 94)

Activate the following subordinate units to implement the ANG Objective Wing

organization at flying units (1 Mar 94)

Operations Group Operations Support Flight

Logistics Group Communications Flight

Support Group
Inactivations

104 Communications Flight, Barnes MAP, MA (1 Oct 93)

108 Communications Flight McGuire AFB, NJ (1 Oct 93)

112 Air Refueling Group, Pittsburgh, IAP, PA and subordinate units except the 146 ARS

transferred to the 171 ARW (1 Oct 93)

114 Communications Flight Joe Foss Field, SD (1 Oct 93)

116 Communications Flight, Dobbings AFRB, GA ( Oct 93)

117 Conununications Flight, Birmingham Apt, AL ( Oct 93)

118 Communications Flight, Nashville MAP, TN (1 Oct 93)

122 Communications Flight, Ft. Wayne MAP, IN ( Oct 93)

123 Communications Flight, Standiford Field, KY ( Oct 93)

124 Communications Flight Boise Air Terminal, I) (1 Oct 93)

127 Communications Flight Selfridge ANGB, MI ( Oct 93)

130 Weather Flight Charleston, WV ( Oct 93)

131 Communications Flight St. Louis IAP, MO (1 Oct 93)

136 Communications Flight, Dallas NAS, TX ( Oct 93)

138 Communications Flight, Tulsa IAP, OK ( Oct 93)

140 Communications Flight Buckley ANGB, CO ( Oct 93)

145 Communications Flight, Charlotte, NC ( Oct 93)

148 Communications Flight, Duluth IAP, MN (1 Oct 93)

149 Communications Flight Kelly AFB, TX (1 Oct 93)

150 Communications Flight, Kirtland AFB, NM (1 Oct 93)

1L Communications Flight, Salt Lake City, UT (1 Oct 93)

152 Communications Flight Reno Cannon IAP, NV (1 Oct 93)

155 Communications Flight Lincoln MAP, NE (1 Oct 93)

157 Communications Flight, Pease ANGS, NH ( Oct 93)

160 Air Refueling Gp, Rickenbacker ANGB, OH and subordinate units except the

145 ARS transferred to the 121 ARW ( Oct 93)

161 Communications Flight Phoenix, AZ (1 Oct 93)

162 Communications Flight Tucson IAP, AZ (1 Oct 93)

163 Communications Flight, March AFB, CA (1 Oct 93)

164 Communications Flight, Memphis AIP, TN a Oct 93)

165 Communications Flight Savannah IAP, GA (1 Oct 93)

166 Communications Flight New Castle Cnty Apt DE ( Oct 93)

169 Communications Flight, McEntire ANGB, SC ( Oct 93)
170 Air Refueling Group, McGuire AFB, NJ and subordinate units except the

150 ARS transferred to the 108 ARW (1 Oct 93)

174 Communications Flight, Hancock Field, NY (1 Oct 93)

175 Communications Flight, Martin State Apt, MD (1 Oct 93)

178 Communications Flight Springfield, OH (1 Oct 93)

180 Communications Flight Toledo Express Apt OH (1 Oct 93)

181 Communications Flight, Hulman Regional Apt IN ( Oct 93)

183 Communications Flight, Capital Apt IL ( Oct 93)

186 Communications Flight Key Field, MS (1 Oct 93)

187 Communications Flight, Dannelly Field, AL (1 Oct 93)

189 Communications Flight, Little Rock AFB, AR (1 Oct 93)

Inactivate the Mission Support Squadron to implement the ANG Objective Wing

organization at flying units (1 Mar 94)

Redesignations

121 Civil Engineering Squadron, Rickenbacker ANGB, OH from 160 Civil Engineering Squadron

(1 Oct 93) 107

123 Intelligence Squadron, Little Rock AFB from 123 Reconnaissance Technical Squadron

(1 Jan 94)

169 Intelligence Squadron, Salt Lake city UT from 169 Electronic Security Squadron

(a Apr 94)

Redesignate the following subordinate units to implement the ANG Objective Wing organization

at flying units ( Mar 94)

Logistics Squadron from Resource Management Squadron

Security Police Squadron from Security Police Flight

Aerial Port Flight from Mobile Aerial Port Flight

Medical Squadron from Tactical and USAF Clinic and Hospital

All Red Horse Squadrons and Flights from Red Horse Civil Engineering Squadrons and Flights

(1 Mar 94)

All Civil Engineer Squadrons and Flights from Civil Engineering Squadrons and Flights

(1 Mar 94)
APPENDIX F - AIR NATIONAL GUARD STATISTICS

Table 3. Aircraft, Unit Location by Gaining Command

AIRCRAFT NUMBER OF AIRCRAFT UNIT LoCATION

AIR COMBAT COMMAND (ACC)

A-10A.................................J2...............103 PG......................Bradley AP, CT

A-10A/OA-10A .................. 18 ......................................... 104 FG....................Barnes MAPMA

A-10A/0A-10A ................. 18 ......................................... 110 FG ............. Battle Creek, MI

A-10A/0A-10A ................. 24 ......................................... 1175 PG ....................... Baltimore, MD

F-15A/B..............................18................16 PW ...............Dobbins AFB, GA

F-15A/B..............................18 ......................................... PW .......... ... St. Louis, M O

F-15A/B ........... ................ 159 FG ................... New Orleans NAS, LA

F-16A/B..............................15 ........................................ 11.3 FW ................................... Andrews AFB, DC

F-16A/B.............................J8................127 FW........................Selfridge AGB, MI

F-16A/B.............................J5................149 FG ............. Kelly AFB, TX

F-16A/B.............................15................156 FG ......................... San Juan, PR

F-16A/B..............................18................169 FG .......................... McEntire AGB, SC

F-16A/B..............................15 ......................................... 182 FG ............................ Peoria, IL

F-16A/B..............................8 .......................................... 183 FG ................................... Springfield, IL

F-16A/B.............................J5................187 FG ............................ Iontgomery, AL

F-16A/B..............................15................188 FG .................. ...Ft Smith, AR

F-16C/D..............................15 ...................................... 1....54 FG ........ ..........Sioux Falls, SD

F-16C/D..............................18................122 FW.....................Ft Wayne, IN

F-16C/D.............................J5................128 FW......................Truax Field, WI

F-16C/D..............................15................152 FW .................................... Des M oines, IA

F-16C/D..............................15................138 FG ...................... Tulsa, OK

F 16C/D..............................18 ......................................... 140 FW .................................... B uckley AGB, CO

FP 16C/D..............................15................150 FG ................................... irtland AFB, NM

F-16C/D..............................15................174 FW .......................... Syracuse, NY

F-16C/D.............................15...............178 FG .................... Springfield, OH
AIRCRAFT NUNR. CF AIRCRAr UNIT LOCATION

F-16C/D......................15 .................... O FG.............Toledo, OH

F-16C/D .............................. 15 .......................................... 181 FG .................................... Terre Haute, IN

F16C/D..............................15...............18PG ................ Sioux City, IA

F-16C/D..............................18...............192 FG .............................. Richmond, VA

F-4G .................................. 12...............124 FG .......................... Boise, ID

OA10A ............................... 18...............111 FG .................................... Willow Grove NAS, PA

RF-4C ................................ 18...............117 ARW .......................... Birmingham, AL

RF-4C ................................ 18................152 RG .......................... Reno, NV

HC-130/HH60 .................. 4/5 ............... 106 RQG ............ F S Gabreshi IAP, NY

HC-130/HH60 .................. 4/5 ........................................ 129 RQG ................................ Moffet NAS, CA

AIR DEFENSE 109

F-15A/B..........................15...............102 FW...............................Otis AGB, MA

F-15A/B..............................15...............142 FG .......................... Portland, OR

F-16A/B..............................15...............19 PG ................ Fargo, ND

F-16A/B..............................15...............120 FG .................... Great Fals, MT

F-16A/B..............................15...............125 FG .................................... Jacksonville, FL

F-16A/B..............................15...............144 FW........................Fresno, CA

F-16A/B.............................J5...............147 FG ..................... Ellington Field, TX

F-16A/B ............................. 15...............148 FG ................. Duluth, MN

F-16A/B..............................15...............158 FG ........................ Burlington, VT

F-16A/B .............................. 15...............177 FG .................... Atlantic City, NJ

C-130E.................................08...............133 AW...................... ...Mvlinneapolis/St Paul, MN

C-130E................................08...............135 AG........................Baltimore, MD

C-130E ............ ............... 143 AG ................... Quonset Pt, RI

C-130E...........................08...............146 AW...........................Channel Islands AGS, CA

C-130E................................08...............167 AG..........................I artinsburg, WV
.t

A-..F NUMBER OF AIRCRAF UNIT LOCATION

C-130H/LC-130H..............4/4.......................................109 AG....................................Schenectady, NY

C-130H .............................. 16................118 AW.........................Nashville, TN

C-130H .............................. 08................123 AW......................... Louisville, KY

C-130H .............................. 08...............130 AG............................ Charleston, WV

C-130H .............................. 08...............136 AW.................................Dallas NAS, TX

C-130H .............................. 08...............137 AW......................Will Rogers IAP, OK

C-130H .............................. 08...............139 AG........................St. Joseph, MO

C-130B/H .......................... 4/8 ....................................... 145 AG .................................... Charlotte, NC

C-130H..............................08...............153 AG.......................Cheyenne, WY

C-130H .............................. 08...............165 AG..............................Savannah, GA

C-130H .............................. 08...............166 AG.......................... Wihnington, DE

C-130H .............................. 08...............179 AG...........................I ansfield, OH

C-130E................................02................191 AG........................Selfridge ANGB, MI

C-141B................................08...............164 AG..............................Memphis, TN

C-141B................................08................172 AG..............................Jackson, MS

C-5A .................................. 11................15AG ...............Stewart IAP, NY

AIR MOBILITY COMMAND

KC-135E ........................... 10................101 ARW ............................... Bangor, ME

KC-135R ............................ 10................107 ARG............................Niagara Falls, NY

KC-135E ........................... 20...............108 ARW................................ McGuire AFB, NJ

KC-135R ........................... 20................121 ARW ................................ Rickenbacker AGB, OH

KC-135E ........................... 10.................126 ARW ........................... Chicago, IL

KC-135R ............................ 10.................128 ARG.................................Milwaukee, WI

KC-135E ............................ 16................134 ARG ........................... noxville, TN

KC-135E ........................... 10...............141 ARW ........................ Fairchild AFB, WA

KC-135E ............................ 10................151 ARG...........................Salt Lake City, UT

KC-135R ........................... 10 ............... 155 ARG.................................Lincoln, NE

KC-135E ........................... 10 ............... 157 ARG..................................Pease AGS, NH

KC-135E ........................... 10 .................................. 161 ARG........................ Phoenix, AZ

KC-135E ............................ 10................163 ARG ................................ Fresno, CA
AIRCRAIr NUMBER OF AIRCRAFT UNIT LOCATION

KC-135E ............................ 08..........................................168 ARG ....................... Fairbanks, AK

KC-135E ............................ 20...............171 ARW ................................ Pittsburgh, PA

KC-135R.......... ............... 186 ARG ............. Meridian, MS

KC-135E............................10...............10 ARG ...................... Forbes Field, KS

AIR EDUCATION & TRAINING COMMAND (AETC)

F-16A/B.............................46...............162 FG .................................... Tucson, AZ

F-16A/B..............................18...............114 FS.....................................ilan ath Falls, OR

C-130E.................................08...............189 AG ........................... .Little Rock AR

PACIFIC AIR COMMAND (PACAP)

C-130H/

HC-13ON/HH-60G ................ 08/02/05 ........................... 176 GP ................................... Anchorage, AK

F-15A/B/KC-135R ............ 18/4 .............. 154 GP ............. ickam AFB, HI

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND (SOC)

EC-130E ............................ 06...............193 S OG .......................... .arrisburg, PA
HISTORY OF

STATE/TERRITORY

TABLE 4.

CONVERSIONS BY

UNIT

STATE/TERRITORY

CONVERSIONS

176 CG

176 CG

176 CG

176 CG

176 CG

176 CG

168 ARG (ACTIVATED)

117 TRW

187 TRG

187 TFG

187 TFG

187 FG

188 TRG

188 TFG

188 TFG

188 TFG

189 TRG

189 TAG

189 TAG

189 TAG

161 ARG

161 ARG

161 ARG

162 TFG

162 TFG

162 TFG

162 TFG

162 FG

ALASKA FY76 C-123J to C-130E

FY84 to C-130H

FY90 ADD 4 HH-60G

FY912 HC-130N/4 HH-60G

FY 87 ACTIVATE EC-135E

FY90 TO KC-135E

FY91 to 8 KC-135E

FY71 RF-84F to RF-4C

FY71 RF-84F to RF-4C

FY82 to F-4D

FY89 to F-16A/B

FY94 to F-16C/D

FY71 RF-84F to RF-101C

FY72 to F-100D

FY79 to F-4C

FY86 to F-16A/B

FY72 RF-84C to RF-101C

FY76 to KC-135A

FY84 to KC135E

FY87 to C-130E

FY76 C-97G to KC-97L

FY78 to KC-135A

FY82 to KC-35E

FY70 F-102A to F-100C

FY77 to A-7D/K

FY86 F-16A/B

FY91 F-16 A/B (AATC)

FY94 F-16A/B/C/D (AATC)

ALABAMA

ARKANSAS

ARIZONA
UNIT CONVERSIONS

CALIFORNIA 144 FIW FY76 F-102A to F-106A

144 FIW FY84 to F-D

144FIW FY89 to F-16A/B

129 ARRG FY76 C19C/U1OB to HC130/HH3

129 AARG FY90 4 HC-130P/N/4 HH-60G

129 AARG FY91 4 HC-130P/5 HH-60G

146 TAW FY70 C-97G to C-130A

146 TAW FY79 to C-130E

146 TAW FY88 moved from Van Nuys

163 TASG FY75 F-102 to O-2A

163 TFG FY83 to F-4C

163 TFG FY87 to F-4E

163 TRG FY90 to RF-4C

163 ARG FY94 to KC-135E

COLORADO 140 TFW FY72 F-100C to F-100D

140 TFW FY74 to A-7D/K -113

140 FW FY92 to F-16C/D

CONNECTICUT 103 TFG FY71 F-102 to F-100D

103 TFG FY79 to A-10A

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 113 TFW FY71F-100C to F-105D

113 TFW FY81 to F-4D

113 TFW FY90 to F-16A/B

113 FW FY94 to F-16C/D

DELAWARE 166 TAG FY71 C-97G to C-130A

166 TAG FY86 to C-130H

FLORIDA 125 FIG FY75 F-102 to F-106

125 FIG FY87 to F-16A/B

GEORGIA 116 TFW FY73 C-124 to F-100D

116 TFW FY79 to F-105G

116 TFW FY83 to F-4D

116 TFW FY86 to F-15A/B

165 TAG FY75 C-124C to C-130E

165 TAG FY82 to C-130H

STATE/TERRITORY
UNIT CONVERSIONS

HAWAII 154 CG FY76 F-102 to F-4C

154 CG FY87 to F-15A/B

154 GP FY93 Activate KC-135R

154 GP FY94 Activate C-130H

IOWA 132 TFW FY70 F-89J to F-84F

132 TFW FY71 to F-100C

132 TFW FY77 to A-7D/K

132 FW FY93 to F-16C/D

185 TFG FY77 F-100C to A-7D/K

185FG FY92 to F-16C/D

IDAHO 124 TRG FY76 F-102 to RF-4C

124 TRG FY84 Activate RF-4C FTU

124 FG FY92 to F-4G

ILLINOIS 126 ARW FY77 KC-97L to KC-135A

126 ARW FY83 to KC-135E

182 TASG FY70 F-84F to U-3A

182 TASG FY71 to 0-2A

182 TASG FY80 to OA-37B

182 FG FY92 to F-16A/B

183 TFG FY72 F-84F to F-4C

183 TFG FY79 to F-4D

183 TFG FY90 to F-16A/B

INDIANA 122 TFW FY71 F-84F to F-100D

122 TFW FY79 to F-4C

122 TFW FY86 to F-4E

122 FW FY92 to F-16C/D

181 TFG FY71 F-84F to F-100D

181 TFG FY79 to F-4C

181 TFG FY96 to F-4E

181 FG FY92 to F-16C/D

KANSAS 190 TRG FY72 RB-57A to RB-57G

190 TRG FY74 to EB-57B

190 ARG FY78 to KC-135A

190 ARG FY84 to KC-135E

sTATE/TERRI1TORY
STATE/TERRITORY UNIT CONVERSIONS

184 TFG FY71 F-100C to F-105D

184 TFG FY80 to F-4D

184 TFG FY87 to F-16A/B

184 TFG FY91 to F-16C/D

184 BG FY94 to B-rB

KENTUCKY 123 TRW FY76 RF-101C to RF-4C

123 TAW FY89 to C-130B

123 AW FY92 to C-130H

LOUISIANA 159 TFG FY71 F-102 to F-100D

159 TFG FY79 to F-4C

159 TFG FY86 to F-15A/B

MASSACHUSETTS 102 FIW FY71 F-84F to F-100D

102 FIW FY72 to F-106

102 FIW FY88 to F-15A/B

104 TFG FY71 F-84F to F-100D

104 TFG FY79 to A-10A

MARYLAND 135 TASG FY71 HO-16/U-10D to O-2A

135 TAG FY77 to C-7A

135 TAG FY81 to C-130B

135 TAG FY90 to C-130E

175 TFG FY70 F-86H to A-37B

175 TFG FY80 to A-10A

175 FG FY93 ADD OA-10A

MAINE 101 TFW FY70 F-89J to F-101B

101 TFW FY76 to KC-135A

101 ARW FY84 to KC-135E

MICHIGAN 110 TASG FY71 RB-57 to)-2a

110 TASG FY81 to OA-37B

110 FG FY92 to A-10A

110 FG FY92 ADD OA-10A

127 TRW FY71 RF-84F to RF-101C

127 TFW FY72 to F-100D

127 TFW FY79 to A-7D/K

127 TFW FY90 to F-16A/B
STATE/TERRITORY UNIT CONVERSIONS

127 FW FY94 to F-16C/D

191 TRG FY71 RF-84F to RF-101C

191 FIG FY72 to F-100D

191 FIG FY73 to F-106

191 FIG FY78 to F-4C

191 FIG FY86 to F-4D

191 FIG FY90 to F-16A/B

191 AG FY94 to C-130E

MINNESOTA 148 FIG FY71 F 102A to F-10B

148 TRG FY76 to RF-4C

148 FIG FY84 to F-D

148 FIG FY90 to F-16A/B

133 TAW FY71 C-97G to C-130A

133 TAW FY82 to C-130E

MISSOURI 131 TFW FY72 F-100C to F-100D

131 TFW FY79 to F-4C

131 TFW FY86 to F-4E

131FW FY92toF-15A/B

139 ARG FY70 H-3A to KC-97L

139 RAG FY77 to C-130A

139 TAG FY87 to C-130H

MISSISSIPPI 172 MAG FY72 C-124C to C-130E

172 MAG FY81 to C-130H

172 MAG FY86 to C-141B

186 TRG FY71 RF-84F to RF-101C

186 TRG FY79 to RF-4C

186 ARG FY92 to KC-135R

MONTANA 120 FIG FY72 F-102A to F-106A

120 FIG FY87 to F-16A/B

NEBRASKA 155 TRG FY72 RF-84F to RF-4C

155 ARG FY94 toKC-135R

NEVADA 152 TRG FY72 RF-101H to RF-101B

152 TRG FY76 to RF-4C
UNIT CONVERSIONS

NEW HAMPSHIRE 157 TAG FY72 C-124C to C-130A

157 ARG FY76 to KC-135A

157 ARG FY85 to KC-135E

157 ARG FY94 to KC135R

NEW JERSEY 177 FIG FY70 F-100C to F-105B

177 FIG FY73 to F-106A

177 FIG FY88 to F-16A/B

108 TFW FY81 F-105B to F-4D

108 TFW FY86 to F-4E

108 ARW FY92 to KC-135E

170 TAG FY73 C-121B to C-7A

170 ARG FY77 to KC-135A

170 ARG FY83 to KC-135E

170 ARG Inactivated 1 Oct 93

NEW MEXIco 150 TFG FY74 F-100C to A-7D/K

150 FG FY93 to F-16C/D 117

NEW YORK 107 FIG FY71 F-100C to F-101B

107 FIG FY82 to F-4C

107 FIG FY87 to F-4D

107 FIG FY91 to F-16A/B

107 ARG FY94 to KC-135R

109 TAG FY71 C-97C to C-130A

109 TAG FY76 to C-130D

109 TAG FY85 to C-130H

105 TASG FY71 U-3A to O-2A

105 1IIAG FY95 to C-5A

174 TFW FY71 F-86H to A-37B

174 TFW FY80 to A-10A

174 TFW FY89 to F-16A/B

174 FW FY93 to F-16C/D

106 TFG FY73 KC-97L to F-102

106 ARRG FY75 to HC-130/HH-3

106 ARRG FY90 to 5 HH-60G

106 ARRG - FY91 to 4HC-130P

sTATE/TERRITORY
STATE/TERRITORY UNIT CONVERSIONS

NORTH CAROLINA 145 TAG FY71 C-124C to C-130B

145 AG FY93 to C-130H

NORTH DAKOTA 119 FIG FY70 F-102 to F-101B

119 FIG FY77 to F-4D

119 FIG FY90 to F-16A/B

OHIO 121 TFW FY72 F-100C to F-100D

121 TFW FY75 to A-7D/K

121 ARW FY93 to KC-135R

160 ARG FY76 KC-97 to KC-135A

160 ARG FY94 to KC-135E

160 ARG FY92 to KC-135R

160 ARG Inactivated 1 Oct 93

179 TFG FY72 F-84F to F-100D

179 TAG FY76 to C-130B

179 TAG FY91 to C-130H

178 TFG FY71 F-84F to F-100D 118

178 TFG FY78 to A-7D/K

178 FG FY93 to F-16C/D

180 TFG FY71 F-84F to F-100D

180 TFG FY79 to A-7D/K

180. FG FY92 to F-16C/D

OKLAHOMA 137 TAW FY75 C-124C to C-130A

137 TAW FY79 to C-130H

138 TFG FY73 C-134C to F-100D

138 TFG FY78 to A-7D/K

138 FG FY93 to F-16C/D

OREGON 114 TFTS FY83 activate F-4C (FTU)

114 TFTS FY89 F-4C to F-16A/B

142 FIG FY71 F-102A to F-101B

142 FIG FY81 to F-4C

142 FIG FY90 to F-15A/B
UNIT CONVERSIONS

PENNSYLVANIA

PUERTO RIco

RHODE ISLAND

SOUTH CAROLINA

SOUTH DAKOTA

TENNESSEE

TEXAS

112 TFG

112 ARG

112 ARG

171 ARW

171 ARW

171 ARW

111 TASG

111 TASG

111 TASG

156 TFG

156 FG

143 TAG

143 TAG

143 TAG

169 TFG

169 TFG

169 FG

114 TFG

114 TFG

114 FG

134 ARG

134 AG

164 TAG

164AG

118 TAW

115 TAW

136 TAW

136 TAW

147 FIG

147 FIG

147 FIG

FY75 F-102A to A-7D/K

FY92 to KC-135E

Inactivated 1 Oct 93

FY73 C-121C to KC-97L

FY77 to KC-135A

FY84 to KC-135E

FY71 U-3A to O-2A

FY81 to OA-37B

FY89 to OA-10A

FY76 F-104C to A-7D/K

FY93 to F-16A/B

FY71 UH 16/U1OD

to C-119/ulOD

FY76 to C-130A

FY90 to C-130E

FY75 F-102 to A-7D/K

FY83 to F-16A/B

FY94 to F-16C/D

FY70 F-102A to F-100D

FY77 to A-7D/K

FY92 to F-16C/D

FY77 KC-97L to KC-135A

FY92 to C-141B

FY75 C-124C to C-130A

FY92 to C-141B

FY71 C-124C to C-130A

FY90 to C-130H

FY78 KC-97L to C-130B

FY86 to C-130H

FY71 F-102A to F-101B

FY82 to F-4C

FY87 to F-D

-119

STATE/TERRITORY
STAT E/TERRITORY UNIT CONVERSIONS

147 FIG FY90 to F-16A/B

149 TFG FY70 F-102A to F-84F

149 TFG FY71 to F-100D

149 TFG FY79 to F-4C

149 TFG FY86 to F-16A/B

UTAH 151 ARG FY73 C-124C to KC-97L

151 ARG FY82 to KC-135E

VIRGINIA 192 TFG FY71 F-84F to F-105D

192 TFG FY82 to A-7D/K

192 FG FY92 to F-16C/D

VERMONT 158 FIG FY74 F-102A to EB-57B

158 TFG FY82 to F-4D

158 TFG FY86 to F-16A/B

158 FG FY94 to F-16C/D

WASHINGTON 141 ARW FY70 F-102A to F-101B

141 ARW FY85 to KC-135E

WISCONSIN 128 TASW FY75 F102A to O-2A

128 TASW FY80 to OA-37B

128 TFW FY90 to A-10A

128 FW FY93 to F-16C/D

128 ARG FY78 KC-97L to KC-135A

128 ARG FY83 to KC-135E

128 ARG FY92 to KC-135R

WEST VIRGINIA 130 TAG FY76 C-119/u-10B to C-130E

130 TAG FY86 to C-130H

167 TAG FY72 C-121C to C-130A

167 TAG FY77 to C-130B

167 TAG FY90 to C-130E

WYOMING 153 TAG FY72 C-121 to C-130B

153 AG FY93 to C-130H
TABLE 5 - PERSONNEL STATISTICS

ANG Losses & Gains

FY 94 Officer

To RESERVES 44% LOSSES BY

CATEGORY

TO ENLISTED 1 /

To CIVIL LIFE 5%

DEATH 1%

OTHER 1%

To EAD % o

RETIREMENT 47%

121

FY 94 Enlisted

LOSSES BY

CATEGORY

To EAD I %

DE. 1% 1%

TO CIVIL LIFE 31 %

To RESERVES 35% 2O8E 

1%

RETIREMEN.T 2o8o

To OFFICER

3%
TABLE 5 - PERSONNEL STATISTICS CONTINUED

ANG Losses & Gains

FY 94 Officer

GAINS BY

CATEGORY

NON PRIOR SVC

3%

OFFICERS GAIN

CATEGORIES

FY 94 Enlisted

GAINS BY

CATEGORY

NON PRIOR SVC

32%

FROM ENL 48%

OFF PRIOR SERVICE

GAIN SOURCES

ENL PRIOR SERVICE

GAIN CATEGORIES

PROM CIV 2%

FROM EAD 8%

FROM RES 42%

122

FROM EAD 21 %

FROM CIv 25%

FROM RES 55%

ENLISTED GAIN

CATEGORIES
TABLE 6 - ANG FUNDING HISTORY

FY 86 - FY 94

ANG MILCON HISTORY (FY86-FY95)

($M)

FY 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94

PRESIDENTS BUDGET

137.2 140 160.8 147.5 164.5 66.5 131.8 132.3 142.4

CONGRESSIONAL ADDS

2 9 17 11 73.8 113 89.2 155.3 110.8

CONGRESSIONAL ADJUSTMENTS

-17.9 0 -26.5 0 0 0 -3.4 0 -5.7

SUPPLEMENTALS

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

APPROPRIATIONS ACT

121.3 149 151.3 158.5 238.3 180.5 217.6 287.6 247.5

GENERAL REDUCTION

-0.014 -0.073 -0.254 -0.459 0 0 0 0 -6.2

RECISSIONS

-3.3 0 0 0 0 0 -0.306 0 0

SEQUESTRATION

-2.463

TOTAL

117.9 149 151 158 235.8 180.5 217.3 287.6 241.3
APPENDIX G - RACE/ETHNIC STATISTICS

Table I Army National Guard

TOTAL FEMALE

TOTAL WHITE % BLACK % HISPANIC % NATIVE AM % ASIAN-AM. % OTHER/UNK % TOTAL %

OFFICER

0-11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0-10 o 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 00% 0 0.0% 0 00%

0-9 0 0 00% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 00% 0 0.0% 0 00%

0-8 45 38 844% 4 89% 3 6.7% 0 00% 2 1.4% 0 0.0% 1 07%

0-7 139 130 935% 3 22% 4 2 9% 0 0.0% 2 1.4% 0 0.0% 1 0.7%

0.6 1,323 1,214 91 8% 36 27% 49 37% 5 0.4% 16 1 2% 3 0.2% 41 3 1%

0.5 3.506 3,224 92o% tos 3.0% 93 2.7% t4 0.4% 65 1 9% 5 0.1% 204 5.8%

0-4 6.646 5,941 894% 339 5.t% 215 3.2% 27 0.4% tos 15% 21 0.3% 563 85%

0-3 11,052 9,551 86.4% 808 7.3% 430 3.9% 43 04% 171 15% 49 0.4% 1.116 101%

0.2 8,801 7348 835% 830 94% 412 4.7% 30 0.3% 144 1 6% 37 04% 663 100%

0-1 5,358 4,446 830% 544 102% 223 42% 25 O5% 89 1.7% 31 06% 559 104%

UNK o 0 o 0 0 o 0 0

TOTAL 30,870 31,892 86.5% 2,669 7.8% 1,429 3.9% 144 0.4% 990 1.6% 146 0.4% 3,367 9.1%

WARRANT

W-4 2,429 2,344 965% 12 0.5% 34 1.4% 10 04% 21 0.9% a 0.3% 21 0.9%

W-3 2,703 2,546 94 2% 63 2.3% 61 2.3% 5 02% 19 07% 9 0.3% 83 3 1%

W-2 2,990 2,738 91 6% 100 3.3% 91 3.0% 10 03% 44 15% 7 0 2% 126 42%

W-1 787 704 89.5% 35 44% 25 3.2% 0 00% 16 2.0% 7 0.9% 39 50%

U2K 0 0 00% 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 8,909 9,.32 9..5% 21o 2.4% 211 2.4% 29 0.9% 108 1.1% 31 o.3% 269 3.o%

OFFICER

TOTAL 45,779 40,224 87.9% 2,079 6.3% 1,.40 3.6% 169 0.4% 690 1.5% 177 0.4% 3,636 7.9%

ENLISTED

E-9 1,779 1,613 907% 82 4.6% 57 3.2% 8 04% 16 09% 3 0.2% 22 12%

E-8 7,282 6,300 865% 503 9% 342 4.7% 32 0.4% 79 1.1% 26 0.4% 166 23%

E-7 21,77. 18,090 83 1% 2,091 9 6% 1,147 5.3% 106 05% 238 1.1% 95 04% 1,182 5.4%

E-6 53,450 41,062 768% 7,799 146% 3,207 60% 443 08% 614 1 t% 325 0.6% 3,035 5.7%

E5 92,281 66,872 725% 16,535 179% 9,078 6 6% 780 08% 1,276 1.4% 740 0.8% 6.729 7 3%

E-4 118,730 83,789 706% 22,043 18.6% 8,779 7.4% 973 0.8% 1,992 1.7% 1,154 t 0% 99,52 - 8.6%

E-3 32,415 23,048 71 1% 6,197 19 1% 2.062 64% 332 , 0% 523 I 6% 253 0.8% 3,366 104%

a-2 15,199 11,110 731% 2,763 to2% 610 53% 171 11% 236 1.6% 1o 0.7% 1,411 9.3%

E-1 17,296 12,848 743% 2,837 164% 1,025 59% 171 1 0% 280 1.6% 135 0.8% 2,159 2.5%

UNK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ENLISTED

TOTAL 360,208 264,741 73.5% 60,850 16.9% 23,507 6.5% 3,016 0.8% 5,254 1.5% 2,940 0.8% 28,022 7.8%

GRAND

TOTAL 405,987 304,965 75.1% 63,729 15.7% 25,147 6.2% 3,185 0.8% 5,944 1.5% 3,017 0.7% 31,658 7.8%
APPENDIX G - RACE/ETHNIC STATISTICS

Table 2. Air National Guard

TOTAL FEMALE

TOTAL WHITE % BLACK % HISPANIC % NATIVE AM % ASIAN-AM. % OTHER/UNK % TOTAL %

OFFICER

0-t 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0

0-10 0 0 o% 0 0.0% o 0.0% o 00% o 00% o 0.0% 0 0.0%

0-9 0 0 oo% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% o 00% o 00% o 00% 0 0.0%

0-8 30 28 933% 1 3.3% o oo% o oo% o oo% 1 33% o o%

0-7 92 82 as1% 5 5.4% 3 3.3% 1 11% t 1.1% o 0o% 2 22%

0-6 514 482 928% 9 1.8% 9 1.9% 2 0.4% 9 1.8% 3 06% 10 1 9%

0-5 3,249 3,010 92.6% 74 2.3% 64 2.0% 26 0.8% s6 1.7% 19 0.6% 145 4 5% 0-4 3,914 3,478 91 2% 137 3.6% 96 2.5% 36 0% 51 1.3% 16 0.4% 406 106%

0-3 4,201 3,767 897% 214 5 1% 114 27% 29 0.7% 54 1 3% 23 0.5% 631 1.0%

o-2 1,174 1,023 87.1% 64 5.5% 44 37% 9 O9% 29 22% 9 07% 269 22.9%

0-1 958 930 86.6% 59 6.1% 29 27% 9 0.8% sI 32% 5 03% 191 19.9%

UNK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 14,032 12,700 90.5% 562 4.0% 356 2.5% 111 0.8% 228 1.% 7. 0.5% 1,654 11.8%

WARRANT

W-4 O 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 00%

W-3 0 o 0% 0 o0% 0 0.0% 0 0.o% 0 oo% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

w-2 0 o 00% o 00% 0 o 0% 0 oo% 0 oo% o 0.0% 0 0.0%

W-1 o 0 0.0% 0 0.0% o 0.0% o 00 o 00% o 0.0% 0 oo%

UNK o 0 0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% O 0.0% o 00% o 00% o 00%

TOTAL 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% O 0.0% O O0.% 0 0.0% o 0.0%

OFFICER

TOTAL 14,032 12,700 90.5% .. 2 4.0% 350 2.5% 111 0.8% 228 1.6% 7. 0.5% 1,654 11.8%

ENLISTED

E-9 1,548 1,422 91 9% 35 2.3% 42 2.7% 26 1 7% 18 1 2% 5 03% 48 3.1%

E-8 3,883 3,561 894% 137 3.4% 148 3.7% 57 14% .4 1 6% 16 04% 227 5 7%

E-7 14,030 12,148 86% 849 6.1% 558 4.0% 179 1.3% 239 1.7% 57 0.4% 1,438 to2%

E-. 24,558 20,313 83.7% 2,142 87% 1,213 4 9% 257 1 0% 479 2.0% 154 0.6% 3,430 140%

E-5 31,11 05,0o2 81.9% 2,931 9.3% 1,607 5 1% 254 O8% 636 2.0% 281 0.9% 4,710 149%

E-4 17,995 14,404 80.6% 1,718 9.6% 955 53% 95 03% 497 28% 196 1,1% 1,8s8 16.0%

E-3 4,135 3,242 784% 455 11.0% 045 5.9% 35 08% 19 26% 40 1 2% 813 19.7%

E-2 1.646 1,337 81 2% 162 9 8% 69 4.2% 13 0.8% 46 2.8% 19 1.2% 314 19 1%

E-1 1.321 1,05 806% 108 .2% 70 53% 21 1 9% 46 3.5% 1 I 0.8% 255 193%

UNK 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0

ENLISTED

TOTAL 100,697 83,394 82.8% 8,537 .5% 4,907 4..% 007 0.9% 2,134 2.1% 788 0.8% 14,093 14.G%

GRAND

TOTAL 114,729 96,094 83.8% 9,099 7.9% 5,263 4.6% 1,048 0.9% 2,362 2.1% 863 0.8% 29,747 13.7%
APPENDIX H - MILITARY SUPPORT MISSIONS

START TERM MISSION ARNG ARNG ANG ANG

STATE DATE DATE CATEGORY MAX MANDAYS MAX MANDAYS

ALASKA

AK 94/08/28 94/09/03 Flood Recovery 66 217 3 12

AK TOTAL 66 217 3 12

ALABAMA

AL 93/07/09 93/12/31

AL 93/10/01 93/12/31

AL 93/10/01 93/12/31

AL 93/10/29 93/11/16

AL 93/10/30 93/11/01

AL 93/11/04 93/11/04

AL 93/12/23 93/12/23

AL 94/01/01 94/02/28

AL 94/01/01 94/09/30

AL 94/01/01 94/03/31

AL 94/01/18 94/02/14

AL 94/01/28 94/02/17

AL 94/02/01 94/02/02

AL 94/02/10 94/02/18

AL 94/02/15 94/02/15

AL 94/03/18 94/05/05

AL 94/03/27 94/04/15

AL 94/04/15 94/04/15

AL 94/04/16 94/04/19

AL 94/05/11 94/08/29

AL 94/05/27 94/08/17

AL 94/06/28 94/07/01

AL 94/07/02 94/07/28

AL 94/09/12 94/09/14

AL 94/09/12 94/09/14

AL TOTAL

Water Haul

Water Haul

Water Haul

Transportation

Emergency Shelter

Search & Rescue

Transportation

Water Haul

Water Haul

Water Haul

Water Haul

Miscellaneous

Water Haul

Storm Recovery

Law Enforcement S]

Law Enforcement S]

Tornado Recovery

Storm Watch

Water Haul

Water Haul

Water Haul

Water Haul

Flood Recovery

Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous

2 112

8 50

4 76

2 4

2 3

4 4

3 3

4 17

10 432

16 22

8 28

48 296

2 2

352 1,517

t 58 58

t 38 263

212 744

1 1

1 1

7 24

15 25

1 3

2,528 4,661

5 6

2 3

3,333 8,355

126

260 327

260 327
ARKANSAS

AR 94/11/13 94/11/16

AR 93/12/07 93/12/16

AR 94/01/25 94/01/29

AR 94/02/10 94/02/18

AR TOTAL

ARIZONA

AZ 93/10/01 94/01/31

AZ 93/10/24 93/10/26

AZ 93/10/27 93/10/28

AZ 93/12/13 94/04/01

AZ 93/12/23 93/12/27

AZ 94/05/09 94/05/11

AZ 94/06/03 94/06/06

AZ 94/06/03 94/06/03

AZ 94/06/04 94/06/06

AZ 94/06/06 94/06/08

AZ 94/06/06 94/06/06

AZ 94/06/06 94/06/08

AZ 94/06/11 94/06/17

AZ 94/06/12 94/0612

AZ 94/06/28 94/06/23

AZ 94/06/28 94/07/03

AZ 94/06/28 94/07/03

AZ 94/06/29 94/07/13

AZ 94/06/29 94/07/05

AZ 94/06/30 94/07/04

AZ 94/07/01 94/07/14

AZ 94/07/01 94/07/22

AZ 94/07/02 94/07/03

AZ 94/07/02 94/07/07

AZ 94/07/02 94/07/03

AZ 94/07/02 94/07/05

AZ 94/07/10 94/07/13

Flood Recovery

Law Enforcement Spt

Search & Rescue

Emergency Shelter

Emergency Shelter

Emergency Shelter

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Emergency Shelter

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Storm Recovery

Water Haul

Water Haul

Storm Recovery

41 103

2 2

2 8

114 446

1S9 559

17 40

17 40

-127

759

12

89

20

4

2

6

1

9

1

1

3

2

1

1

10

2

2

6

13

33

41

12

3

1

12

2

759

12

89

233

16

3

12

1

9

1

1

3

12

1

2

16

215

11

15

31

149

137

23

17

2

32

7
AZ 94/07/12 94/07/1S

AZ 94/07/12 94/07/15

AZ 94/07/12 94/07/20

AZ 94/07/14 94/07/17

AZ 94/07/16 94/09/30

AZ 94/07/27 94/07/28

AZ 94/08/07 94/09/30

AZ 94/08/07 94/08/11

AZ 94/08/07 94/09/30

AZ 94/08/09 94/09/30

AZ 94/08/16 94/08/22

AZ 94/09/06 94/09/14

AZ TOTAL

CALIFORNIA

CA 94/08/20 94/08/23

CA 93/10/27 93/11/11 128

CA 93/10/27 93/10/28

CA 93/11/15 93/11/19

CA 93/12/02 93/12/02

CA 93/12/12 93/12/12

CA 94/01/17 94/01/17

CA 94/03/08 94/03/09

CA 94/04/20 94/04/20

CA 94/04/23 94/04/23

CA 94/05/02 94/07/19

CA 94/05/11 94/05/27

CA 94/05/23 94/05/24

CA 94/06/01 94/06/01

CA 94/06/08 94/06/10

CA 94/06/17 94/06/23

CA 94/06/27 94/06/28

CA 94/06/27 94/06/28

CA 94/07/21 94/07/21

CA 94/07/22 94/08/12

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Search & Rescue

Emergency Shelter

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Earthquake

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Miscellaneous

Transportation

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Search & Rescue

Fire Fighting Spt

14

16

16

15

2

2

13

7

2

5

2

2

1,144

23

84

4

1

2

4

2,371

4

4

5

7

4

0

4

4

0

80

4

39

56

64

109

46

8

2

87

13

12

15

14

17

2,252

124

697

8

5

2

4

18,513

4

4

5

155

39

0

12

24

0

80

24

399

3 3

12 322

34* 116

7 7

80 80
CA 94/07/22 94/08/12

CA 94/07/22 94/09/30

CA 94/08/10 94/09/30

CA 94/08/10 94/09/30

CA 94/08/10 94/09/30

CA 94/08/10 94/09/30

CA 94/08/10 94/09/30

CA 94/08/10 94/08/10

CA 94/08/10 94/09/30

CA 94/08/11 94/09/30

CA 94/08/11 94/09/30

CA 94/08/12 94/08/29

CA 94/08/16 94/08/20

CA 94/08/16 94/08/22

CA 94/08/16 94/08/21

CA 94/08/17 94/09/30

CA 94/08/17 94/09/30

CA 94/08/17 94/08/17

CA 94/08/19 94/08/23

CA 94/08/20 94/08/1

CA 94/08/20 94/08/20

CA 94/08/22 94/08/22

CA 94/08/24 04/08/24

CA 94/08/28 94/08/24

CA 94/08/28 94/08/31

CA 94/09/05 94/09/05

CA 94/09/12 94/09/12

CA 94/09/21 94/09/26

CA TOTAL

COLORADO

CO 94/06/27 94/07/03

CO 94/06/27 94/07/07

CO 94/07/03 94/07/07

CO 94/07/07 94/07/09

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous

Search & Rescue

Transportation

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

1Viscellaneous

Miscellaneous

San Luis Obisbo

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Search & Rescue

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Fire Fighting Spt

18

20

10

2

25

1

1

4

6

32

32

5

5

5

2

1

1

2

37

2

3

8

4

1

24

3

3

42

2,943

133

284

22

14

31

148

124

4

10

122

137

19

12

9

11

66

46

2

224

3

3

15

4

2

115

3

3

238

21,903 134 531

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

129

9

20

4

25

19

156

26

51
CO 94/07/07 94/07/12

CO 94/07/12 94/07/13

CO 94/07/13 94/07/20

CO 94/07/15 94/07/27

CO 94/07/15 94/07/19

CO 94/07/16 94/07/27

Search & Rescue

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

17

5

18

12

8

24

17

5

49

155

8

312

CO TOTAL 142 798 0 0

DELAWARE

DE 94/02/11 94/02/15 Storm Recovery 155 826 30 97

DE 94/04/07 94/04/07 Storm Recovery 12 12

DETOTAL 167 838 30 97

FLORIDA

FL 94/03/08 94/03/14 Law Enforcement Spt 4 22

FL 94/06/09 94/07/06 Miscellaneous 18 390

FL 94/07/02 94/07/04 Storm Recovery 91 240

FL 94/07/06 94/07/27 Flood Recovery 705 7,040 50 219

FL 94/08/18 94/08/21 Miscellaneous 37 102 6 12

FL TOTAL 855 7,794 56 231

GEORGIA

GA 94/01/17 94/01/18 Storm Recovery 4 8

GA 94/01/09 94/01/20 Miscellaneous 2 4

GA 94/0119 94/01/19 Water Haul 1 1

GA 94/01/19 94/01/20 Water Haul 2 4

GA 94/01/20 94/01/21 Water Haul 2 2

GA 94/03/27 94/04/05 Tornado Recovery 19 35

GA 94/05/06 94/05/06 Water Haul 2 2

GA 94/07/05 94/09/03 Flood Recovery 2,999 57,551 679 10,021

GA TOTAL 3,031 57,607 679 10,021
HAWAII

HI 94/03/24 94/03/25 Flood Recovery

HI 94/07/21 94/07/21 Hurricane Watch

HI 94/08/01 94/08/01 Fire Fighting Spt

5

8

5

10

8

5

HI TOTAL I8 23 0 0

IOWA

IA 93/10/01 94/05/31 Flood Recovery 15 2,308

IA TOTAL is 2,308 0 0

IDAHO

ID 94/08/04 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 103 631 22 249

ID 94/08/09 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 11 134

ID 94/08/10 94/08/14 Fire Fighting Spt 4 22

ID 94/08/10 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 89 829

ID 94/08/17 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 52 207

ID 94/08/17 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 3 12

ID 94/08/17 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 8 20

ID 94/08/21 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 3 3

ID TOTAL 273 1,858 22 249

ILLINOIS

IL 93/07/03 93/12/01 Flood Recovery 130 7,631 2 95

IL 94/04/13 94/04/17 Flood Recovery 80 603

IL 94/05/17 94/07/30 Miscellaneous 35 3351

IL TOTAL 245 9,385 2 95

INDIANA

IN 93/10/23 93/10/23 Miscellaneous

IN 93/11/14 93/11/20 Flood Recovery

IN 94/01/16 94/01/22 Water Haul

IN 94/01/17 94/01/20 Storm Recovery

IN 94/02/11 94/02/11 Transportation

IN 94/02/25 94/02/26 Storm Recovery

IN 94/03/28 94/04/08 Flood Recovery

32

94

50

44

2

9

49

32

252

221

140

2

16

458

sai
IN 94/04/27 94/04/28

IN 94/05/06 94/05/09

IN 94/06/01 94/06/02

IN 94/06/09 94/06/10

IN 94/07/08 94/07/11

IN 94/07/20 94/07/23

IN TOTAL

KANSAS

KS 93/10/03 93/10/03

KS 93/10/13 93/10/13

KS 93/10/13 93/10/13

KS 94/01/26 93/01/27

KS 94/02/19 94/02/21

KS 94/02/27 94/02/27

KS 94/03/18 94/03/19

KS 94/04/11 94/04/11

KS 94/07/02 94/07/02

KS 94/07/02 94/07/02

Tornado Recovery

Miscellaneous

Water Haul

Transportation

Water Haul

Water Haul

Flood Recovery

Flood Recovery

Flood Recovery

Storm Recovery

Water Haul

Search & Rescue

Miscellaneous

Flood Recovery

IViscellaneous

Miscellaneous

85

0

0

3

1

6

375

0

1

1

6

6

1

4

10

2

2

139

0

0

3

1

6

1,270

0

1

1

10

13

15

19

29

31

33

0 0

3

3

5

3

2

1

2

5

2

2

3

3

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

KS TOTAL 33 152 28 46

KENTUCKY

KY 93/12/28 94/09/30 Storm Recovery 0 289

KY 94/01/12 94/01/29 Water Haul 2 34

KY 94/01/17 94/01/28 Storm Recovery 1,122 5,971 21 58

KY 94/02/11 94/02/28 Storm Recovery 600 3,557

KY 94/07/20 94/07/20 Water Haul 3 18

KY 94/07/26 94/07/26 Search & Rescue 5 5

KY TOTAL 1,732 9,874 21 58

LOUISIANA

LA 94/01/27 94/01/28 Flood Recovery 4 4

LA 94/02/10 94/03/25 Storm Recovery 107 1099

LA TOTAL 111 1,103 0 0
MASSACHUSETTS

MA 93/10/14 93/10/14

MA 93/10/28 93/10/28

MA 93/11/20 93/11/20

MA 94/04/18 94/04/18

MA 94/06/01 94/07/17

MA 94/07/03 94/07/05

MA 94/07/12 94/07/22

MA 94/07/12 94/07/22

MA 94/09/14 94/09/18

Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous

Storm Recovery

Water Haul

23

20

73

229

38

26

13

1

58

23

20

73

229

608

81

13

8

58

63 63

MA TOTAL 481 1,113 63 63

MARYLAND

MD 94/02/12 94/02/15 Storm Recovery 4 4

MD TOTAL 4 4 0 0

MAINE

ME 93/11/08 93/11/12 Fire Fighting Spt 11 72

ME 94/04/18 94/04/20 Flood Recovery 11 11

ME TOTAL 22 83 0 0

MICHIGAN

M 94/07/14 94/07/25 Miscellaneous 7 83

MI TOTAL 7 83 0 0

MINNESOTA

MN 93/10/05 93/10/22 Transportation 199 2,348 25 305

MN 94/04/26 94/04/27 Tornado Recovery 36 72

MN 94/07/09 94/07/12 Search & Rescue 44 76

MN 94/08/26 94/08/26 Law Enforcement Spt 26 26

MN TOTAL 305 2,522 25 30S

133
MISSOURI

MO 93/07/04 93/10/05

MO 94/07/09 94/07/13

MO 94/07/31 94/07/31

MO TOTAL 106 4,239 0 1,386

MISSISSIPPI

MS 94/01/29 94/01/29 Tornado Recovery 3 3

MS 94/02/10 94/03/29 Storm Recovery 614 6,523 30 228

MS 94/07/19 94/09/30 Water Haul 4 126

MS TOTAL 621 6,652 30 228

MONTANA

MT 94/07/27 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 218 10148 80 1954

MT TOTAL 218 10,148 80 1,954

-134 NORTH CAROLINA

NC 93/10/06 93/10/07

NC 93/10/22 93/10/29

NC 93/11/05 93/11/07

NC 93/11/07 93/11/10

NC 93/11/14 93/11/14

NC 93/11/23 93/11/23

NC 93/12/20 93/12/22

NC 93/12/29 93/12/29

NC 94/01/14 94/01/20

NC 94/01/17 94/01/17

NC 94/01/17 94/01/18

NC 94/01/18 94/01/18

NC 94/01/19 94/01/20

NC 94/01/22 94/01/23

NC 94/01/29 94/02/29

NC 94/02/01 94/02/21

NC 94/02/02 94/02/15

NC 94/02/04 94/02/05

Flood Recovery

Flood Recovery

Miscellaneous

100

1

5

4,229 1386

5

5

Search & Rescue

Water Haul

Water Haul

Water Haul

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Storm Recovery

Transportation

Emergency Shelter

Storm Recovery

Storm Recovery

Storm Recovery

Emergency Shelter

Water Haul

Search & Rescue

Miscellaneous

Search & Rescue

Water Haul

2

4

2

2

2

2

20

3

149

2

5

4

2

4

4

5

4

3

4

4

2

8

2

2

26

3

241

2

5

4

4

4

4

23

4

3

9-1
NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

94/02/04 94/02/05

94/02/04 94/02/04

94/02/09 94/02/13

94/02/15 94/02/15

94/02/22 94/02/23

94/03/02 94/03/02

94/03/17 94/03/21

94/03/31 94/03/31

94/04/13 94/04/14

94/04/18 94/04/18

94/04/26 94/04/26

94/04/28 94/05/02

94/05/05 94/05/06

94/05/10 94/05/11

94/05/17 94/05/20

94/05/25 94/05/26

94/05/26 94/05/27

94/05/31 94/05/31

94/06/02 94/06/02

94/06/20 94/06/22

94/06/22 94/06/22

94/06/22 94/06/22

94/06/27 94/06/28

94/07/02 94/07/08

94/07/02 94/07/14

94/07/04 94/07/04

94/07/07 94/07/07

94/07/07 94/07/07

94/07/08 94/07/11.

94/07/20 94/08/03

94/07/21 94/07/21

94/07/26 94/08/04

94/07/29 94/07/29

94/07/29 94/07/29

94/07/29 94/07/29

2 

2

2 

4

5 15

Search & Rescue

Transportation

Storm Recovery

Water Haul

Water Haul

Transportation

Water Haul

Flood Recovery

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Water Haul

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

IViscellaneous

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Fire Fighting Spt

Search & Rescue

Water Haul

Water Haul

Water Haul

Emergency Shelter

1Viscellaneous

Water Haul

IViscellaneous

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Water Haul

IViscellaneous

Water Haul

Water Haul

1Viscellaneous

Water Haul

Transportation

33 33

15

113 176
NC 94/08/17 94/08/17

NC 94/08/21 94/08/21

NC 94/08/26 94/08/26

NC 94/08/28 94/08/29

NC 94/08/30 94/08/30

NC 94/09/05 94/09/08

NC 94/09/11 94/09/11

NC 94/09/12 94/09/13

NC 94/09/19 94/09/20

NC 94/09/23 94/09/23

NC 94/09/26 94/09/26

NC 94/09/28 94/09/28

NC 94/09/29 94/09/30

Flood Recovery

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

19

3

2

2

2

3

2

2

11

2

1

2

2

32

3

2

2

2

4

2

2

11

2

1

2

2

NC TOTAL 360 551 155 230

NEBRASKA

NE 94/03/02 94/03/07 Storm Recovery 7 33

NE 94/04/15 94/04/29 Storm Recovery 68 351

NE 94/07/03 94/07/03 Storm Recovery 7 7

NE TOTAL 82 391 0 0

NEW JERSEY

NJ 94/03/02 94/03/03 Storm Recovery 32 138

NJ 94/12/15 94/12/16 Storm Recovery 61 101

NJ . 94/01/18 94/01/18 Storm Recovery 11 11

NJ 94/02/08 94/02/08 Storm Recovery 27 101

NJ 94/02/11 94/02/12 Storm Recovery 24 49

NJ 94/03/16 94/07/01 Miscellaneous 0 0

NJ 94/06/05 94/07/15 Miscellaneous 16 136 2 2

NJ TOTAL 171 536 2 2

NEW MEXICO

NM 93/11/18 93/11/22

NM 93/11/29 93/12/14

NM 94/01/31 93/02/15

Water Haul

Water Haul

Emergency Shelter

2

2

3

10

32

82
NM 94/03/12 94/03/13

NM 94/03/27 94/03/31

NM 94/04/14 94/04/14

NM 94/06/07 94/09/30

NM 94/06/15 94/06/17

NM 94/06/27 94/06/28

NM 94/08/24 94/09/12

NM TOTAL

NEVADA

NV 93/12/01 93/12/02

NY 94/05/31 94/05/31

NV 94/07/01 94/07/04

NY 94/07/02 94/07/20

NY 94/07/23 94/07/25

NY 94/07/25 94/07/25

NV 94/07/26 94/07/30

NY 94/08/06 94/09/30

NY 94/08/09 94/09/30

NV 94/08/12 94/09/30

NV TOTAL

NEW YORK

NY 93/10/17 94/10/17

NY 94/01/04 94/01/05

NY 94/01/12 94/03/23

NY 94/03/03 94/03/06

NY 94/03/24 94/03/25

NY 94/04/13 94/04/29

NY 94/04/16 94/04/25

NY 94/05/02 94/06/01

NY 94/06/16 94/06/16

NY 94/06/29 94/06/29

NY 94/08/08 94/08/08

NY 94/08/12 94/09/30

NY TOTAL

Law Enforcement Spt

Search & Rescue

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Miscellaneous

Storm Recovery

Search & Rescue

Storm Recovery

Fire Fighting Spt

Flood Recovery

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Transportation

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Law Enforcement Spt

Emergency Shelter

Emergency Shelter

Water Haul

Water Haul

Water Haul

Water Haul

Water Haul

2 4

2 8

2 2

2 214

2 6

2 4

2 40

21 402 0 0

10

3

6

52

5

9

9

57

20

15

186

12

3

20

173

15

11

47

135

102

45

563

15

10

137

30

53

25 83

3 3

4 16

7 19

3 3

21 33

51 287

23 34

6 6

14 91

318 1932

74 1,084

2 2

5 5

3 3

171 753

691 4,233
OHIO

OH 94/01/04 / 94/01/09

OH 94/01/28 94/01/29

Storm Recovery

Flood Recovery

32

11

126

22

OH TOTAL 43 148 0 0

OKLAHOMA

OK 93/10/15 93/10/16 Search & Rescue 4 4

OK 94/03/08 94/03/09 Storm Recovery 8 8

OK 94/03/10 94/03/11 Water Haul 3 5

OK 94/04/12 94/04/15 Flood Recovery 29 73

OK 94/07/09 94/07/14 Flood Recovery 35 64

OK 94/08/18 94/08/24 1Viscellaneous 15 15

OK TOTAL 94 169 0 0

OREGON

OR 94/08/02 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 139 698

OR 94/08/05 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 122 981

OR 94/08/05 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 129 982

OR 94/08/07 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 127 838 14 28

OR 94/08/11 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 8 20

OR 94/08/14 94/09/30 Fire Fighting Spt 173 577

OR 94/08/15 94/09/31 Fire Fighting Spt 96 288

OR TOTAL 794 4,384 14 28

PENNSYLVANIA

PA 94/01/06 94/01/14 Storm Recovery (1) 93 3,527 8 32

PA 94/01/19 94/01/24 Storm Recovery (2) 282 1050

PA 94/01/27 94/02/07 Storm Recovery (3) 493 4,291 135 1,697

PA 94/03/02 94/03/15 Storm Recovery (4) 137 442 6 10

PA TOTAL 1,005 9,310 149 1,739
PUERTO RICO

PR 93/10/01 94/09/30

PR 94/01/07 94/03/14

PR 94/07/24 94/09/30

PR 94/08/18 94/09/30

Law Enforcement Spt 1073

IViscellaneous 25

Water Haul 23

Miscellaneous 28

PR TOTAL 1,149 140,596 0 0

RHODE ISLAND

RI 93/10/01 93/11/16 Water Haul 12 407

RI 93/12/06 94/01/07 IViscellaneous 12 263

RI 94/07/11 94/07/14 Water Haul 38 88 23 23

RI 94/08/03 94/08/04 Law Enforcement Spt 117 180

RI 94/09/01 94/09/10 Water Haul 20 48 4 4

RI TOTAL 199 986 27 27

SOUTH CAROLINA

SC 94/09/16 94/08/23 Tornado Recovery 190 568

SC 94/08/16 94/08/19 Water Haul 20 76

SC TOTAL 210 644 0 0

SOUTH DAKOTA

SD 94/07/11 94/07/11 Fire Fighting Spt 8 8

SD 94/08/15 94/08/16 Fire Fighting Spt 16 24

SD TOTAL 24 32 0 0

TENNESSEE

TN 94/01/19 94/03/04 Storm Recovery 798 2,418

TN 94/02/09 94/03/13 Storm Recovery 369 2,733 87 339

TN 94/06/28 94/06/28 Tornado Recovery 8 8

TN TOTAL 1,175 5,159 87 339

TEXAS

TX 94/02/16 94/03/03

TX 94/03/20 94/03/22

TX 94/04/10 94/04/12

IVMiscellaneous

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

43

6

6

60

18

18

139,412

604

552

28

139
TX 94/04/27 94/04/27

TX 94/04/27 94/04/27

TX 94/05/01 94/05/01

TX 94/06/13 94/07/10

TX 94/07/03 94/07/05

TX TOTAL

UTAH

UT 94/02/02 94/03/09

UT 94/07/06 94/07/06

UT 94/07/29 94/09/30

UT 94/07/30 94/08/02

UT 94/07/31 94/07/31

UT 94/08/02 94/09/31

UT 94/08/02 94/08/15

UT 94/08/05 94/08/13

UT 94/08/07 94/08/15

UT 94/08/08 94/09/30

UT 94/08/08 94/09/30

UT 94/08/16 94/09/30

UT 94/08/17 94/09/30

UT 94/08/17 94/09/30

UT TOTAL 165 830 37 151

VIRGINIA

VA 94/01/03 94/01/05 Storm Recovery 24 26

VA 94/02/12 94/02/15 Storm Recovery 13 41

VA 94/03/02 94/03/04 Storm Recovery 34 78

VA 94/04/16 94/04/16 Fire Fighting Spt 4 4

VA TOTAL 75 149 0 0

VERMONT

VT 93/12/31 94/01/01 Fire Fighting Spt 15 15

VT TOTAL 15 15 0 0

Miscellaneous

Tornado Recovery

Tornado Recovery

Miscellaneous

Fire Fighting Spt

Miscellaneous

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Search & Rescue

Search & Rescue

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

Fire Fighting Spt

6

6

10

18

3

98

2

3

3

10

2

3

3

3

2

106

16

2

6

4

6

6

10

515

9

642

2

3

51

17

2

17

36

24

16

530

80

12

24

16

0 0

37 151

1*
WASHINGTON

WA 94/05/17 94/05/17 Search & Rescue 2

WA 94/07/24 94/08/24 Fire Fighting Spt 2,459 38,455 247 3,458

WA TOTAL 2,481 38,457 247 3,458

WISCONSIN

WI 93/11/04 94/11/05 Water Haul 6 6

WI 94/01/20 94/01/24 Water Haul 2 10

WI 94/02/23 94/02/23 Water Haul 1 1

WI 94/03/04 94/09/30 Water Haul 2 313

WI 94/03/11 94/03/13 Water Haul 3 8

WI 94/03/29 94/03/29 Search & Rescue 3 3

WI 94/05/19 94/05/20 Water Haul 1 2

WI TOTAL 18 343 0 0

WEST VIRGINIA

WV 94/01/05 94/02/21 Storm Recovery 105 1084

WV 94/04/07 94/05/08 Flood Recovery 10 20

WV TOTAL 115 1,104 0 0

2

141