alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Pennsylvania National Guard Hosts Lithuania Foreign Minister

/ Published March 25, 2024

FORT INDIANTOWN GAP, Pa. – Lithuania Minister of Foreign Affairs Gabrielius Landsbergis branded the Pennsylvania National Guard’s cooperation with Lithuania as “exemplary” during a U.S. visit March 23.

Maj. Gen. James McCormack, the assistant adjutant general of Pennsylvania, and other members of the Pennsylvania National Guard hosted a Lithuanian delegation that included Landsbergis and Audra Plepytė, Lithuanian ambassador to the United States.

The Pennsylvania National Guard and Lithuanian armed forces have been partners for over 30 years as part of the Department of Defense National Guard Bureau State Partnership Program. The SPP is guided by State Department foreign policy goals and facilitates military-to-military engagements.

“Gabrielius Landsbergis’ visit to Fort Indiantown Gap underscores the strong partnership between the PA National Guard and our SPP partner, Lithuania,” said McCormack. “It’s an honor to host him, and we value the opportunity to exchange insights and strengthen our alliance further.”

McCormack and Maj. Alex Stewart, Pennsylvania’s SPP program director, gave the Lithuanian delegation a tour that included Fort Indiantown Gap’s Training Support Center, live fire ranges and the Eastern Army National Guard Aviation Training Site at Muir Army Heliport.

“Visits like these are crucial for fostering mutual understanding and cooperation between our nations,” said McCormack. “They provide an invaluable opportunity to discuss shared security challenges, enhance interoperability and reaffirm our commitment to the defense of our allies.”

Lithuania’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said priorities of the partnership include assistance developing command capabilities of the Lithuanian Armed Forces division, training UH-60 Black Hawk crews and developing resilience to cyber threats together with the Regional Cyber Defence Centre in Lithuania.

“The exemplary cooperation of Lithuania and the Pennsylvania National Guard strengthens transatlantic security and our readiness to face threats,” said Landsbergis. “We are grateful to the [service members] of the Pennsylvania National Guard for more than 30 years of engagement and a strong relationship based on mutual benefit and respect.”
**Document Title Ab** **stract FDMS Document Type**  **FDMS Document Sub-Type**

Section 114 Response from Agrium (Sacramento, California). NOX CEMS data from 2007. Section 114 Response from Agrium (Sacramento, California). NOX CEMS data (1 hour averages) from 2007. Supporting & Related Materials Data Section 114 Response from Agrium (Sacramento, California). NOX CEMS data. Novem ber 2007. Section 114 Response from Agrium (Sacramento, California). NOX CEMS data (hourly

averages) from Novem ber 2007. Supporting & Related Materials Data Section 114 Response from Agrium (Sacramento, California). NOX CEMS data. December 2007. Section 114 Response from Agrium (Sacramento, California). NOX CEMS data (hourly

averages) from December 2007. Supporting & Related Materials Data**Source Citation Au**  **thors (limited to 48**  **characters including spaces) Document Date**  Agrium 3/11/2010 Agrium 3/11/2010 Agrium 3/11/2010XLS

XLS

XLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO					18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO					SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

****

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xinhua China Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xianping Wang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.		
Dated: May 12, 2006                                                                             /s/ Xianping Wang                                                                                                                                            Xianping Wang, President, Chief			                                                                                                              Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Par 3 Services,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Daniel L. Hodges,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting  Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Cash Technologies, Inc.
Los Angeles, California


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Cash Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-41536) of our
report dated August 31, 2000, except for note 9 which is dated September 12,
2000, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Cash Technologies,
Inc. as of May 31, 2000 and for the year then ended, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph
regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.



Los Angeles, California                             /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

September 27, 2001
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2016

No. 04-16-00714-CV

IN RE Garry David GALLARDO

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On October 31, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered the petition and is of the opinion that Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on December 7, 2016.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-18321, styled Garry D. Gallardo v. Maria L. Gonzalez, et al, 

pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Renée Yanta presiding.
___________ No. 95-3756

___________ Ming Shan Lin, also known as * Allen Lin, * * Petitioner, * * v. * Petition for Review from the * United States Immigration and Immigration and Naturalization * Naturalization Service. Service; Dean A. Hove, Acting * District Director, U.S.I.N.S.; * [UNPUBLISHED] Janet Reno, Attorney General of * the United States of America, * * Respondents. *

___________ Submitted: July 26, 1996 Filed: August 12, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Petitione r Ming Shan Lin seeks review of a final order of the Board of Imm igration Appeals affirming a deportation order issued in th e immigrationcourt. The Board denied petitioner's application for asylum and wi thholding of deportation. We conclude that substantial evidenc e supports the Board's decision. Accordingly, the decision of the Board is affirmedand the petition for review is dismissed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

### -2- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
AZTAR CORPORATION
                    2390 East Camelback Road, Suite 400
                          Phoenix, Arizona 85016





                             February 25, 1998



Mr. Meridith P. Sipek
Controller
Aztar Corporation
2390 East Camelback Road, Suite 400
Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Dear Mr. Sipek:

          By letter agreement dated July 6, 1995 (the "Severance
Agreement"), Aztar Corporation (the "Corporation") agreed to provide you
with certain severance benefits in the event your employment with the
Corporation terminated in a Qualifying Termination (as defined in the
Severance Agreement).  In consideration of your valuable services to the
Corporation and in order to induce you to continue your employment with the
Corporation, the Corporation and you hereby agree to amend the Severance
Agreement by amending and restating clause ii) of Section 7.1 of the
Severance Agreement in its entirety, as follows:


     "ii) in lieu of any further salary or other payments to you under any
     agreement for periods subsequent to the Date of Termination, the
     Corporation shall pay as severance pay to you, at the time specified
     in Section 7.2, a lump sum severance payment (together with the
     payments provided in Sections 7.1(iii) and 7.1(iv) below, the
     "Severance Payments") equal to 200% of your base salary as in effect
     as of the Date of Termination and 200% of the average of the annual
     bonuses awarded to you pursuant to the Corporation's performance bonus
     plan (the "Bonus Plan"), or any successor bonus plan thereto, with
     respect to the three (3) fiscal years (or your total years of
     employment with the Corporation, if less than three (3)) preceding the
     Date of Termination;"
          If this letter sets forth our agreement on the subject matter
hereof, kindly sign and return to the Corporation the enclosed copy of this
letter, which shall then constitute our agreement on this subject.


                              Sincerely,

                              AZTAR CORPORATION



                              By PAUL E. RUBELI
                              Paul E. Rubeli
                              Chairman of the Board, President and
                                   Chief Executive Officer


Agreed to this 24th day
of March 1998.

MERIDITH P. SIPEK
Meridith P. Sipek

Address:  Meridith P. Sipek
          Controller
          c/o Aztar Corporation
          2390 East Camelback Road, Suite 400
          Phoenix, Arizona  85016
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 16a0657n.06

Case No. 16-5252

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL SOTO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

RANDY WHITE, Warden

Respondent-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE WESTERN 

DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

O P I N I O N

BEFORE: McKEAGUE, KETHLEDGE, and STRANCH Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Miguel Soto filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 in which he asserts claims of juror bias and denial of the right to self-representation in 

violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) provides relief to a 

habeas petitioner if the state-court decision was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable 

application of, clearly established Federal Law, as determined by the Supreme Court.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254(d). If fair minded jurists could disagree as to the correctness of the state court’s decision, 

then Soto would not be entitled to relief. Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 102 (2011). The 

district court found that Soto failed to meet his burden of showing the Kentucky Supreme Court 

unreasonably applied federal law on both of his claims. R. 23, Dist. Ct. Op., PID 139, 141.
Case No. 16-5252

Miguel Soto v. Randy White

- 2 -

This court reviews the district court’s legal conclusions de novo and any factual findings 

for clear error. Magna v. Hofbauer, 263 F.3d 542, 546 (6th Cir. 2001). Having duly considered 

the district court’s opinion in light of Soto’s appellate arguments, we find no error. His 

arguments are unavailing and are fairly and adequately addressed in the magistrate court’s 

review and recommendation as fully adopted by the district court. To issue another opinion 

reiterating the analysis would be duplicative and unnecessary. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the 

district court’s order denying Soto’s habeas corpus petition on these two claims.
LNKD-Exhibit 10.1 - 3/31/2013-10Q








EXHIBIT 10.1


2013 EXECUTIVE BONUS COMPENSATION PLAN


		
	•
	Eligibility: The Executive Team, at the respective Bonus percentages as approved by the Committee. An executive must remain employed by the Company through 12/31/13 to be eligible for a bonus payout. New members of the Executive Team hired during 2013 will be eligible on a pro rata basis if their start date is before 10/01/13. Should an executive’s offer letter set forth bonus terms that differ from this plan, the offer letter will supersede the plan.


		
	•
	Bonus pool is funded by achievement of corporate objectives based on performance measures in five areas:  Revenue; Members; Internal Uniques; Page views; and Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). The bonus pool is funded at the average percentage of all of the performance measurements for the Plan. 


		
	•
	For each measurement there are Threshold, Target, and Stretch performance levels. If performance for any measure is below the Threshold performance level, there is no payout with respect to that measure. The potential payout for any measure is capped at the Stretch performance level. For performance achievement between the specified Threshold and Target, and between Target and Stretch performance levels, payouts are interpolated on a straight-line basis.


		
	•
	Bonus payouts to eligible executives will be based solely on achievement of the bonus pool targets set forth below. Bonuses will be calculated based on the sum of actual salary payments during the eligibility period.


		
	•
	Payout of the executive bonus plan is formulaic and self-effectuating.


		
	•
	Maximum bonus payout is 150% of each executive’s target bonus percentage. For clarification purposes, if each of the Stretch Payout Targets are met, each executive would receive 150% of his or her target bonus percentage.


Bonus Pool Targets
	
					
	Corporate Plan
	Plan Weight
	Threshold- 
 50% Payout Target
	Target -  
100% Payout Target
	Stretch -  
150% Payout Target

	Revenue  (Total, $MM)
	20%
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]

	Members (EOY, MM)
	20%
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]

	Internal Uniques (MM) 1
	20%
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]

	Page views (BN)
	20%
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]

	EBITDA ($MM)
	20%
	[***]
	[***]
	[***]




1 Q4 average. 











[***] Information has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential Treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William C. Adair, Jr., hereby certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of Direct General
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Direct General Corporation.

        March 5, 2004             By:  /s/ William C. Adair, Jr.
             Date                    -------------------------------------------
                                                              (Signature)
                                  Name:  William C. Adair, Jr.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                  Title:  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          and President
                                          --------------------------------------
Upland Cotton 2022

Production by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Bales

Not Estimated

< 10,000

10,000 - 24,999

25,000 - 49,999

50,000 - 74,999

75,000 - 99,999

100,000 +
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K




CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) September 9, 2011









DENNY’S CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware
0-18051
13-3487402(State or other jurisdiction of
Commission File No.
(I.R.S. EmployerIncorporation or organization

Identification No.)





203 East Main Street


Spartanburg, South Carolina 29319-0001


(Address of principal executive offices)


(Zip Code)





(864) 597-8000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)




Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations of the registrant under any of the following provisions:




[    ]  Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)




[    ]  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)




[    ]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))




[    ]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))









Item 8.01. Other Events.
 
 Denny’s Corporation (the “Company”) today announced the adoption of a pre-arranged stock trading plan for the purpose of repurchasing a limited number of the Company’s common stock in accordance with guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Company’s policies regarding stock transactions. This plan has been established in accordance with, and as a part of, the Company’s stock repurchase program previously announced on April 4, 2011. Repurchases under the Company’s 10b5-1 plan will be administered through an independent broker. The plan will cover the repurchase of shares commencing no earlier than September 19, 2011 and expiring November 3, 2011. Repurchases are subject to SEC regulations as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan.









SIGNATURES




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.






Denny's CorporationDate: September 12, 2011
/s/  F. Mark WolfingerF. Mark WolfingerExecutive Vice President,Chief Administrative Officer andChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                                        Exhibit 8.1

                                           SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES


Significant Subsidiary                            Jurisdiction of Incorporation                Business Name
<S>                                               <C>                                         <C>
Television Azteca, S.A. de C.V.                              Mexico                         Television Azteca
Grupo TV Azteca, S.A. de C.V.                                Mexico                         Grupo TV Azteca
Azteca Digital, S.A. de C.V.                                 Mexico                         Azteca Digital
Red Azteca Internacional, S.A. de C.V.                       Mexico                         Red Azteca Internacional
Azteca International Corporation                             Delaware                       Azteca America
Unefon, S.A. de C.V.                                         Mexico                         Unefon
</CAPTION>
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                            EXHIBIT 4.(a)(xviii)

This is to confirm that the following Parties have come to this AGREEMENT:

Madge.web N.V., Madge Networks N.V. and Volendam Investeringen N.V. have come to
this Agreement under the following terms:

    o   Madge.web N.V. will repay the debt owed to Volendam (USD 624,035) in 12
        monthly instalments of USD 52,002.91, the first of these being made on
        October 31, 2001.


    o   Madge.web N.V. will pay interest on the outstanding debt at 2.0% above
        one month LIBOR calculated from January 26, 2001 until payment on
        September 30, 2002. Interest will be paid in the final instalment


    o   Madge Networks N.V. agrees to guarantee the debt and interest due from
        Madge.web N.V. as per the above 2 points.


    o   Volendam will release the order that it has filed at the three banks in
        the Netherlands and notify the banks of this accordingly.


    o   This will be in full and final settlement of all monies due from Madge
        Networks N.V. or any part of the Madge Networks group (including
        Madge.web) to Volendam.


Thus signed on September 28, 2001 by:



/s/ Christopher Semprini                    /s/ Hans Fraats & Karel Romer
-------------------------                   -----------------------------
Madge.web N.V.                              Volendam Investeringen N.V.




/s/ Martin Malina
-------------------------
Madge Networks N.V.