alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of The State ofConnecticut and Pfizer Inc. ) ) ) ) ) Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8093C Modification No.3

Whereas, the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Pfizer Inc. ('Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order No. 8093C and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows: I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to comply withthe emissions limits ofSubsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174- 22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ('Regulations) are hereby replaced with May I, 20I

### O. 2. Any references to October Ist with respect to the date by which the Respondents shall estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits ('DERCS) and/or allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009. 3. Any references to May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and retirement ofnon-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31, 2010. 4. All references to September I, 2008 with respect to the submission ofFuture Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September I, 2009. 5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8093C and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent shall comply with the requirements ofSections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174- 22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations. 6. All other terms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and OrderNo. 8093C, as modified, shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street· Hartford, CT 06106-5127 http://www.ct.gov/dep All Equal Opportuniry Emp/oyer

# ·

# ..

Pfizer Inc. 2 Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8093C Modification No.3
The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice. Pfizer Inc. , Signature:

# ~tl~-t"~ Name: 

# Cme/O--' .4 )1", 

### ke,vj'''' J 

# ff Title:

### iEx~(v-/v~**2\~c+cr)** 

## f.{'Je.T Date:

## ~rl 

# I /"", 2001
Issued as a modification ofa Trading Agreement and Order.

# ~,&f- Director Engineering and Enforcement Division Bureau ofAir Management

"";.'
#### BUEL E. HUTCHINSON *vs.*HENRY EATON, Appellant.

•APPEAR PROM CXRCUIT COURT, CRAWFORD COUNTY.

Heard July 23.]

[Decided Aug. 10, 1859.

*Bill of Exceptions*— Finding■—New *Trial*— Practice.

■Where a trial is had before the judge, without exception to the evidence, or motion for a new trial, nor other exception taken, except to the finding, the judgment will not be disturbed on the ground that the evidence is not sufficient to support the finding.

*227The finding of a judge as to the facts, is equivalent to a special verdict of a jury; and an exception to the finding presents for review only the decisions upon matters of law.

A review of the facts in the finding can only he had upon motion, for a new trial, and the decision of the court on that motion, may be reviewed in the supreme court, if the evidence he saved by a case or bill of exceptions.

The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

*Bull*& *King,*for the appellants.

*B. E. Hutchinson,*for the respondent.

*By the Court,*

Paine, J.

This was an action for services as attorney, in drawing papers, &c., on the settlement of a divorce suit between the defendant and his wife. It was tried before the court without a jury, and the judge found that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred dollars, and judgment was entered accordingly.

There was no motion for a new trial, no objection to the evidence, and no exception taken, except to the finding of the court. And yet the only reason urged here why the judgment should be reversed, is that the evidence is not sufficient to authorize the finding. We should not disturb the judgment, even if the case were brought here in such a condition as to enable,us to review that question so far as such a question is ever reviewed by this court. But we do not think in this instance that the question is presented to us at all. It is well settled that under the present practice, where a suit is tried before the judge without a jury, his finding, as to the facts, is equivalent to the special verdict of a jury. And an exception, therefore, to the finding and decision of the court, can only present for review decisions upon matters of law. There is no provision allowing an exception to the finding of the judge as to a matter of fact, so that it shall-present to this court for review, the *228question whether the evidence supported the finding, any more than there is for an exception to the verdict of a jury with similar effect.

Sec. 20, chap. 132, R. S., 1858, relating to trials by the judge, provides that exception may be taken only to matters of law, and it also provides, that either party, “desiring a review upon the evidence appearing upon the trial, may make a case or exceptions in like manner as upon trials by jury.” &c.

In either case, to present in this court the question whether the verdict or finding is supported by the evidence, there must be a motion for a new trial in the court below, on the ground that it is not so supported, and the decision of the court on that motion may be reviewed here. In this case the question is not presented, and the judgment is affirmed with costs.
Airmen honor Vermont’s oldest living veteran
 
  By Senior Master Sgt. Michael Davis
  SOUTH BURLINGTON, Vt. – Honor is a word ingrained into the ethos of men and women who have ever served in the U.S. military. Therefore, it comes as no surprise that when Airmen of the 158th Fighter Wing learned that Vermont’s oldest living veteran, 106-year-old Lenny Roberge, wanted to visit the Vermont Air National Guard, they were excited and started making plans for his visit. “To be able to show Lenny around our base and let him experience seeing the F-35 up close was going to be really cool,” said Master Sgt. Chad Cosgrove, executive administrative assistant for the 158th Fighter Wing. “It was going to be an honor to meet Lenny, and we were all really looking forward to connecting with him.” Unfortunately, due to a spike of COVID-19 cases, it was not to be. So the Airmen of the 158th Fighter Wing pondered what to do instead. “All of us at the fighter wing staff felt that it was really important to honor Roberge,” said Maj. Frank King, executive officer of the 158th Fighter Wing. “We decided that what better way to ring in the New Year than to present him with a flag flown in an F-35 on a combat training sortie over the mountains of Vermont and New York.” Abiding by COVID-19 protocol, on Dec. 22, Col. Adam Rice, vice wing commander of the 158th Fighter Wing, and three other Airmen were finally able to honor Roberge in a small ceremony on the front porch of his nursing home in South Burlington. They presented him with a flag that flew in the F-35A Lightning II. “It feels like I’m at home. I couldn’t have a better home,” said Roberge. “Thank you!” In appreciation, Roberge honored the Airmen of the wing by handing out fresh apple pie he baked earlier in the day. “Thank you for your service to our country,” said Rice while Roberge rendered him a final salute. “We wish you all the best in the new year.” So happy New Year to Mr. Lenny Roberge, Vermont’s oldest World War II veteran, who has now lived through two worldwide pandemics. You are an inspiration to us all.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 67 (Wednesday, April 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[DR.5B711.IA000815]


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Tribal-State Compact 
for Regulation of Class III Gaming between the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua 
Tribe of Indians of Oregon (Tribe) and the State of Oregon (State), 
Amendment II.

DATES: Effective: April 8, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA) Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all 
compacts and amendments, including technical amendments, are subject to 
review and approval by the Secretary. The Tribal-State Compact for 
Regulation of Class III Gaming between the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua 
Tribe of Indians of Oregon and the State of Oregon, Amendment II, 
establishes criteria to deny or terminate contracts related to Class 
III gaming. The perpetual term of the compact remains unchanged.

    Dated: April 2, 2015.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2015-08059 Filed 4-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Science and Technology Policy

# AGENCY:

Office of Science and Technology Policy.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Office of Science and Technology Policy published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         Notice, 2015-05906, on March 16, 2015, pages 13639-13641, concerning a Request for Public Comment on the Impact of the Select Agent Regulations. The document contains incorrect dates as we wish to extend the comment period to April 10, 2015, 5 p.m. ET.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

May Chu at (202)-456-6029.

## Corrections

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 16, 2015, in the FR Doc. 2015-05906,                    

                        (1) On page 13640 in the                         **SUMMARY**                         section (which starts on page 13639) in the first column, first line, correct the date to read:                    

5 p.m. ET on April 10, 2015 to be considered.

                        (2) On page 13640, first column, correct the                         **DATES**                         caption to read:                    

# DATES:

Documents must be received by 5:00 p.m. ET on April 10, 2015 to be considered.

Dated: March 30, 2015.

Ted Wackler,

Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant Director.

[FR Doc. 2015-07649 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3170-F5-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Northeast   Mortgage
Corporation  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Brian  Rogerson,  President  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Brian Rogerson
Brian Rogerson
President
(Principal Executive Officer)


November 11, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00251-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLANT

V.

ROCHELLE DENISE BALLARD STATE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 4 OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered the “Motion For Voluntary Dismissal Of State’s 

Appeal.” The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate 

procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been 

delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 8, 2011
# Guard film tells Soldier's story

/ Published Nov. 28, 2007

ARLINGTON, Va. - Like many Soldiers deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, the Soldiers from the Oregon National Guard's 2nd Battalion, 162nd Infantry, brought their personal cameras along during their deployment to Iraq in 2004. They snapped photos of each other firing weapons, shot video of explosives they detonated and logged plenty of footage of their own commentaries intermixed with Soldier humor.

Little did these Soldiers know that their day-to-day antics would one day represent deployed Guardmembers everywhere, preserved in a feature-length documentary film called, "This is War: Memories of Iraq."

The National Combat History Archive with Lucky Forward Films used the unscripted testimonies of nine Soldiers of varying ranks and experiences to narrate the events. Photos and video the Soldiers shot with their own personal cameras depict their experiences.

"We wanted to make a very non-political film that took someone who's never been to Iraq to show what it means to go into combat," said the film's director, Gary Mortensen. "We told it in a non-specific way so that it could represent soldiers everywhere -- we wanted to tell a tale that anyone who has been over there can identify with."

Mortensen added that the unique thing about the film is that these Soldiers had their own personal recording devices on hand, giving an intimate view of what they saw on a daily basis. The Soldiers had no idea any of this would be turned into a film, so the result is a very honest and raw portrait of their experiences.

"It's very powerful," said Sgt. 1st Class Phillip "Vince" Jacques, one of the Soldiers featured in the film. "It really represents the professionalism of these guys and shows exactly what troops are going through over there. They're the ones fighting the war. You might as well hear their story."

Having been present at various screenings of the film, Jacques noticed that the audience reaction was often one of awe. "Whether they support the war or not, they come away with a whole different view of what Soldiers are doing over there," he said.  

National audiences are also beginning to take notice. "This is War" won the Audience Choice Award and Best Documentary at the Idaho International Film Festival, and was later awarded the Jury Award: Best Documentary at the Florida International Media Market. It also took home awards for best documentary and best director at the Sweet Onion Film Festival in Walla Walla, Wa.

Unfortunately, the film isn't available at your local video store just yet; Mortensen explained that they are working on the distribution and broadcast rights to the film. However, the film can be purchased by calling (503) 597-7030 or by checking out the Web site at www.luckyforwardfilms.com.

According to the site, all sales of the film help support the Fallen Soldiers Relief Fund, the National Combat History Archive, the Iraq/Afghanistan Oregon Memorial Fund and the Wounded Warriors Project, a non-profit organization that helps injured service men and women by providing programs and services to meet their unique needs.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Southern Copper Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Oscar Gonzalez Rocha,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(1)                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Oscar  Gonzalez Rocha              |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Oscar Gonzalez  Rocha                  |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

February 26, 2008

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by section 906 has been provided to Southern CopperCorporation and will be retained by Southern Copper Corporation and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Breweries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason W. Rees,
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ JASON W. REES
Jason W. Rees
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
March 10, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2874 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2874

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
  payments under the Indian Health Service Loan Repayment Program and 
     certain amounts received under the Indian Health Professions 
                         Scholarships Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2021

    Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
  payments under the Indian Health Service Loan Repayment Program and 
     certain amounts received under the Indian Health Professions 
                         Scholarships Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Indian Health Service Health 
Professions Tax Fairness Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR PAYMENTS UNDER INDIAN HEALTH 
              SERVICE LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``under section 108 of the 
Indian Health Care Improvement Act,'' after ``338I of such Act,''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The heading for section 108(f)(4) of such 
Code is amended by striking ``and certain'' and inserting ``, indian 
health service loan repayment program, and certain''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments made after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS RECEIVED UNDER INDIAN HEALTH 
              PROFESSIONS SCHOLARSHIPS PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 117(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of 
subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) 
and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(D) the Indian Health Professions Scholarships 
                Program under section 104 of the Indian Health Care 
                Improvement Act.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to amounts received in taxable years beginning after December 31, 
2021.
                                 <all>
```
MAURICIO KYLER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1417

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed July 16, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Dawn Caloca

- Johnson , Judge

.

Mauricio Kyler , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED

.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, J J

. , CONCUR.