/ 

/ 

ANNUA L REPOR T / Chief National Guard Bureau 

INCLUDIN G 

SPECIA L MOBILIZATIO N 

REPOR T 

Departments of the Army and the Air Force 

National Guard Bureau 

Washington 25, D. C, 31 October 1962 

To THE SECRETARIES OF THE ARMY AND AIR FORCE: 

The annual Report of the Chief, National Guard Bureau, for the fiscal year 

ending 30 June 1962, is respectfully submitted. 

The United States, traditionally, has not maintained a permanent active 

military force adequate for our national security. But we have provided for a 

citizen-soldier system—the National Guard—which through 300 years has supplied 

much of the armed might needed to protect and preserve our form of government: 

an organization of the people, by the people, and for the people. Across the length 

and breadth of the fifty States, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia, ablebodied citizens have voluntarily joined and trained with the National Guard. From 

the days before the Revolutionary War, these citizens have assumed the role of 

the soldier to protect their homes and their country. 

Thus when the Berlin Crisis developed early in fiscal year 1962, and the 

President under special authority of the Congress ordered the mobilization of a 

part of our Ready Reserve forces, approximately 65,500 Army and Air National 

Guardsmen were brought into active Federal service. This mobilization, in keeping 

with their citizen-soldier tradition, was to demonstrate the high degree of professionalism achieved by the National Guard since Korea, as this report will show. 

The year's accomplishments and the status of the Army and Air National 

Guard on 30 June 1962 can be noted in a glance at pages^- to &-. 

The facts are covered in greater detail in the narrative, pictures, charts, and 

tables which follow. 

We gratefully acknowledge the continued support of all those who have 

contributed to the continued progress of the National Guard during the past year: 

The President and the Congress of the United States; the Departments of Defense, 

Army, and Air Force; the Governors and the military departments of the several 

States, Puerto Rico, and District of Columbia. 

The National Guard, both Army and Air, demonstrated in the Berlin Crisis 

that it is indeed the system that works, a system as much a part of our form of 

government as the Constitution itself. It is the strong arm .. . the valiant spirit . . . 

which serves our nation in peace and war. 

D. W. MCGOWAN 

Major General 

Chief, National Guard Bureau 
N 

• * 

Major General Donald W. McGowan 

Chief, National Guard Bureau 

Major General Winston P. Wilson 

Deputy Chief, National Guard Bureau 

Major General Clayton P. Kerr 

Assistant Chief, National Guard Bureau, 

Army (Retired 31 August 1962) 

Brigadier General Francis S. Greenlief 

Assistant Chief, National Guard Bureau, 

Army ** 

•Selected 6 August 1962 •• Selected 19 October 1962 
ANNUAL REPORT 

of THE CHIEF 

National Guard Bureau 

FISCAL YEAR 1962 

REPORTS CONTROL SYSTEM • CONG 1011 

miSll MEN of the MISSILE AGE 

i 

<; 1 

V 
PAGE 

PART I—THE BIG PICTURE 5 

Personnel 6 

Equipment 6 

Organization 6 

Training .. 8 

Facilities 8 

PART II—MOBILIZATION SECTION 9 

Army National Guard 11 

Air National Guard. ... . 14 

PART III—MISSION, ORGANIZATION & ADMINISTRATION. 18 

Mission .. . 18 

Organization _ __ .. . 19 

National Guard Bureau _. 20 

Management improvement 21 

Legislation 22 

Public Affairs Program 24 

Trophies and Awards . 31 

Regulations . 32 

Publications Review Board 32 

State Service . 33 

Army-Air Force Support 37 

PART IV—ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 38 

Comptroller Functions 39 

Appropriations 39 

Funding 39 

Obligations 39 

Finance Service _ . . 39 

Audit and Reports of Survey._ .. 39 

Project MAC . . 40 

Technicians. _ . 40 

Quarterly Review and Analysis. . _. . 41 

Reports Control ._. 41 

Personnel . .. 41 

Strength ' 41 

State Strengths.._ 42 

Procurement (Officers & Warrant Officers) 44 

Officer Personnel Actions 44 

Reserve Officers Personnel Act 44 

Warrant Officer Conversion Program . _ 45 

Procurement (Enlisted) . 45 

RFA-55 Training Program .___. 45 

Enlisted Personnel Actions . 46 

Army National Guard Register .__ 46 

Medical 47 

Responsibilities. 47 

Personnel 47 

Organization and Training . 48 

Units 48 

Special Forces 48 

Air Defense Artillery 51 

Training Criteria 52 

Combat Training 53 

Armory Training -. 53 

Field Training 53 

Annual Inspections 54 

School Program Si 

Army Aviation 56 

Types of ARNG Aircraft 57 

Army Advisors 58 

PAGE 

Logistics. . . 58 

Equipment 58 

Maintenance 60 

Inventory Management. _ 61 

Excess Property 61 

Installations 62 

Construction 62 

Total Armory Facilities 62 

Armory Construction Obligations 63 

Non-Armory Construction. 63 

Real Property .. . 63 

Repairs and Utilities 64 

Field Training Installations 64 

PART IV—AIR NATIONAL GUARD ..65 

Foreword 65 

Comptroller 65 

Personnel. 67 

Strength.. 67 

Officer Procurement 67 

Enlisted Procurement 68 

Records Management 69 

Air National Guard Register 69 

Air Technicians 69 

Medical _ 70 

Organization 70 

Manning 70 

Operations and Training 71 

Organization 71 

Training 71 

Aircraft Conversions 73 

Operations 74 

Pilot Categorization & Flying Status 75 

Air Force Advisers 75 

Ground Communications 76 

Force Structure 76 

Mission 76 

Civil Engineering 77 

Facilities 77 

Construction 78 

Major Repair and Modification 78 

Maintenance and Operations 78 

Systems and Logistics.. 78 

Aircraft Inventory „__ 78 

Types of Air National Guard Aircraft 79 

Maintenance 82 

Vehicles 83 

Supply and Services 83 

Programs and Requirements 83 

APPENDIXES: 

A. Chief—National Guard Bureau 

& Predecessor Orgs 84 

B. State Adjutants General 85 

C. U. S. Property & Fiscal Officers 85 

D. Officers on Duty in NGB 86 

E. Trophies & Awards 88 

F. Regulations 90 

G. Army National Guard—Obligations 94 

H. Air National Guard—Obligations 102 

I. Mobilized National Guard Units 1 04 

GEOGRAPHICAL DISPERSAL OF THE NATIONAL GUARD 

BY STATE 113 
The Big Picture 

The Guard Dollar 

OPERATIONAL 

MISSIONS 

MOBILIZATION 

TRAINING 

STATE 

SERVICE 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

$171,500,000 

236,100,000 

OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE 

PERSONNEL 

ACILITIES 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

$199,758,000 

47,000,000 

429,469,000 

18,275,000 

265,033,000 

Congress appropriated S694,502,000 for the Army and Air National Guard in Fiscal Year 1962. 

While a substantial sum, this represents less than two percent of the entire FY 1962 Department of 

Defense appropriation. And in FY 1962 part of this appropriation was turned over to the Army and Air 

Force because of the Berlin Mobilization. 

Yet through the unique Federal-State partnership which characterizes the National Guard, these annual 

appropriations have made possible the development and maintenance of a significant portion of U.S. military 

strength, not only to augment the active Army and Air Force in time of national peril, but to perform essential 

service in peacetime as well. 

The following pages give the overall view, the "big picture" of the Army and Air National Guard. 
Personnel ARMY 

405,000 OFFICERS AND MEN—trained and ready . . . nearly half the size of the 

active Array. Of these, some 44,000 were serving on active duty. 

69,100 NEW ENLISTEES—with prior active service or scheduled for six months' 

active duty training. 

REENLISTMENTS—a high rate for a proud organization with a 300-year history. 

20,000 FULL-TIME TECHNICIANS (including those on active duty)—the hard 

core of professionals .. . for maintenance, for training, for administration. 

Equipment ARMY 

$1.3 BILLION INVENTORY—including some of the Army's latest items . . . modern 

equipment for effective training. Such as the following, which includes the 

equipment taken on active duty with the units: 

3,053 TANKS 

1,806 OTHER TRACK VEHICLES 

50,000 WHEELED VEHICLES 

825 AIRCRAFT 

1,791 ARTILLERY PIECES 

10,500 ITEMS WITHDRAWN FROM NONACTIVATED UNITS TO 

SUPPORT THE MOBILIZATION 

Organization ARMY 

4,400 UNITS IN 2,600 COMMUNITIES—of the 4,400 units, 440 units were ordered 

to active duty last fall. A local force, ready for any emergency . . . dispersed 

to withstand nuclear attack. 

PENTOMICALLY ORGANIZED—light, mobile, hard hitting 

nuclear or conventional battlefields. 

ready to fight on 

21 INFANTRY & 6 ARMORED DIVISIONS—two of which were called to active 

duty—11 more divisions than the active Army .. . the two active ones 

combat ready, the others very close to it. 

69 NIKE MISSILE BATTERIES—operational and on sitedefending against attack 24 hours every day. 

-part of ARADCOM— 
AIR 

71,386 OFFICERS AND AIRMEN—trained, ready now to fight side-by-side with 

the active Air Force. In fact, 21,000 of these were doing so in the Berlin 

crisis. 

8,656 NEW ENLISTMENTS—including skilled active Force veterans. 

68.1% REENLISTMENTS—of units remaining in a State status throughout the 

year. The Air Guard traditionally has the highest reenlistment rate of any 

military force in the nation. 

13,987 FULL-TIME TECHNICIANS—keeping equipment and aircraft ready for 

instant action. 

$1.5 BILLION INVENTORY 

1,970 AIRCRAFT 

F-lOOs SA-16s 

F-102s C-123s 

F-104s RB-57s 

C-97s C-119s 

KC-97s F-84Fs 

AIR 

-all that's needed for instant action 

RF-84-Fs 

F-89s 

F-86Ls 

F-86Hs 

C-121s 

AIR 

605 TRAINED UNITS 

24 COMBAT WINGS, WITH .. . 26 Air Defense Squadrons—16 long range 

heavy airtransport squadrons—1 medium air transport squadron—21 tactical 

fighter squadrons—10 tactical reconnaissance squadrons—7 flying support 

squadrons—of which 31 squadrons mobilized last fall. 

ELEMENTS OF 26 Fighter Interceptor Squadrons, 4 Aircraft Control & Warning 

Squadrons daily augmenting the active Air Force defense coverage. 
Training ARMY 

OVER 390,000 BASICALLY TRAINED (97%)—a l l recruits with 

prior service or 6 months Army training . . . over 80% 

of officers with active service. 

UNIT TRAINING ONLY—Individual training—a thing of the 

past .. . all units now on team level 

10,000 ATTENDING SCHOOLS—Maintaining proficiency, 

qualifying for promotion . . . standards identical with 

active Army . 

50,500 TAKING ARMY EXTENSION COURSES. 

9 5 % ATTENDANCE—at weekly and at annual field training. 

AIR 

OVER 95% BASICALLY TRAINED—a "ready-now" force, requiring all non-prior service men to take basic training 

with the Air Force. 

SCHOOLING—over 6,800 officers and airmen completed 

service and technical schools in '62 . . . Air Guardsmen 

abreast of the times. 

OVER 95% ATTENDED weekly unit training and annual field 

training. 

Facilities ARMY 

2,067 Adequate Armories 

959 Maintenance Shops 

62 Warehouse Complexes 

63 Shop Hangars 

AIR 

115 Hangars 

92 Flying Fields 

43 Non-Flying Installations—including: Aircraft Control & 

Warning Sites and Communications Squadrons Sites. 

Army and Air Guard units are self-sufficient—in their armories, their shops and at their air bases. Because of this, 

they are capable of instant mobilization. 
Fiscal year 1962 opened with a threat. Soviet Premier Khrushchev had announced he would, with a 

single stroke of the pen, end the established, legal rights of the Western Powers to be in Berlin. This would 

imperil not only the freedom of the two million citizens of West Berlin, but also the ultimate security of the 

United States. For, as President John F. Kennedy put it, that city had become "the great testing place of Western courage and will, a focal point where our solemn commitments and Soviet ambitions now meet in basic 

confrontation." 
We were determined to meet that challenge. 

But Berlin was not the only trouble spot in the world. The communists were threatening complete takeover 

in Laos and South Viet Nam and, just off the coast of Florida, in Cuba, they had already taken over. 

On July 25, 1961, President Kennedy addressed the nation. He outlined the steps he was planning to 

take to strengthen our position throughout the world. 

".. . I am asking the Congress," he said in a key section of the speech, "for authority to order to 

active duty certain Ready Reserve units and individual Reservists, and to extend tours of duty; and, 

under that authority, I am planning to order to active duty a number of air transport squadrons and 

Air National Guard tactical air squadrons, to give us the airlift capacity and protection we may need. 

Other Reserve forces will be called up if needed." 

Mobilization was in the air—for the third time in twenty years. 

On the following day, July 26, Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara went before the Senate Appropriations Committee with a request from the President for the authority to order to active duty, without 

the declaration of a state of National Emergency, 250,000 members of the Ready Reserve for a period not to 

exceed one year. On July 31, only five days later, final Congressional approval was given to Senate Joint 

Resolution 505, granting this authority. 

—The Department of Defense alerted 193 Air National Guard units for possible call 

to active duty. 

August 1 ( —Secretary of the Army Elvis J. Stahr announced that the Army had designated 113 

Army National Guard units as priority units for possible recall to active duty. 

—Department of Defense alerted 145 Air National Guard units and 107 Army National Guard units for entry on active duty on 1 October. From the Air Guard 

these included six tactical fighter wings, a tactical reconnaissance wing, two longrange air transport wings, and a tactical control group. 

—A total of 630 company-size units from the Army National Guard were placed on 

accelerated training schedules to increase their combat readiness. These included 

four combat divisions: the 26th Infantry Division, Massachusetts; the 28th Infantry Division, Pennsylvania; the 32nd Infantry Division, Wisconsin; and the 49th 

Armored Division, Texas. 

September 19.—Secretary of Defense McNamara alerted an additional 359 company-size units from 

/ ( the Army National Guard, to report by October 15. This alert included the 32nd 

Infantry Division, the 49th Armored Division, and the 150th Armored Cavalry Regiment. This brought to 44,371 the number of Army National Guardsmen scheduled 

for active duty. More than 33,000 officers and men remained on intensive training 

schedules. 

October 1-15—All alerted Army and Air National Guard units reported for active duty. 

November 1 —Three Air National Guard F-104 fighter-interceptor squadrons and 15 supporting 

units were activated to further augment the Air Force. This brought to 21,067 the 

number of Air National Guardsmen called into active Federal service. 

These Guardsmen—over 65,000 of them in all—were activated by the President "to prevent a war, not 

to fight a war." The fact that they served for nearly a year and were then returned to their State status without 

having to fight is ample testimony to their effectiveness. In fact, Chancellor Adenauer of West Germany stated 

that, in his opinion, the prime factor influencing the Soviet slowdown on Berlin was the swift, decisive buildup 

of American forces. 

But the presence of these Guardsmen did more than forestall the communists; it gave America immediate 

strcngth-in-being while the active Army and Air Force built up to higher peacetime levels. 

These Guardsmen came to active duty at a higher state of combat-readiness than at any time in our history, 

and it was this factor, ultimately, that made the mobilization the most successful ever conducted. 

20 The following pages are devoted to a detailed report of that mobilization—"the mobilization for peace." 
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

The period from the receipt of the alert to the 

reporting date was devoted to the completion of administrative matters: procurement of blank forms, 

completion of medical examinations by all personnel 

who had not been examined within the previous 12 

months, the conversion of each Army National 

Guard 201 Personnel File to conform to active Army 

procedures, processing requests for delay and/or 

deferments, and preparation of vehicles and equipment for the move to the mobilization station. 

To assist in the administrative details of the 

mobilization, the Commanding General of each 

Army Area allocated spaces for early order to active 

duty of unit commanders, other key officers, and 

certain enlisted personnel who were available and 

would volunteer for active duty prior to the October 15 mobilization date. During this same period, 

the Army National Guard technician program provided a nucleus of trained, full-time personnel in all 

units. These technicians proved to be the backbone 

of the Guard in assisting in the transition from State 

to Federal service. They further demonstrated they 

were fully qualified to carry on their administrative, 

training and maintenance functions after mobilization. 

On 1 October 1961, the 32nd Infantry Division, the 49th Armored Division, and the 264 nondivisional units were 45,118-men strong. When 

mobilized, they brought into Federal service 98.3 

per cent of that strength, a record far superior to 

any previous mobilization. The State Adjutants 

General reported that only a minute percentage of 

the members of these units made any inquiry about 

possible deferment. (See Appendix I.) 

Within a few days of mobilization, advance detachments began moving to mobilization stations. 

Upon completion of the full move to mobilization stations, all units began training under applicable Intensified Combat Training Programs (ICTPs) 

8 and 13 and local directives implementing these 

programs. Filler personnel for the units began arriving in late October. 

The first weeks at mobilization stations were 

devoted to a continuation of administrative process-
ing, necessary orientation training, and required retraining in preparation for receipt of equipment and 

fillers. The remainder of training conducted under 

ICTP 8 was as follows: 

a. Phase 1 (two weeks) completion of crew, 

squad, section and platoon training. 

b. Phase 2 (two weeks) completion of company, battery, and troop-level training. 

c. Phase 3 (four weeks) consisted of battalion, 

combat command, and division field training exercises. 

In the earlier phases of training, equipment 

shortages created some training difficulties. Later, 

terrain limitations were a problem. These were 

overcome by the usual improvisations. All units 

entered Phase 3 in good training condition and derived maximum benefit from the exercise conducted 

during this period. 

Upon completion of ICTP 8, units began the 

Operational Readiness Training Program. This consisted mainly of refresher-type training at platoon, 

company and battalion level, and the firing of various 

crew-served weapons qualification courses. During 

this period, units ran a platoon confidence course in 

which each individual platoon was required to conduct a prescribed tactical problem over a three-day 

period. The purpose of this course was to test the 

platoon leaders and non-commissioned officers of 

each platoon, acting independently from their parent 

unit, when faced with various tactical problems. 

During this period, each unit having a nuclear delivery capability, was given a technical proficiency 

inspection (TPI) by both Army Headquarters and 

the Continental Army Command (CONARC). 

Never before had National Guard units displayed such a high state of readiness when ordered 

to active duty, and never before had they completed 

their post-mobilization training so quickly. General 

12 James Van Fleet, after an inspection of the 32nd 

Combat training . . . on 

ving out 

Infantry Division at Fort Lewis, Washington, reported that "the quality of these units is far above 

any previous mobilization that took place in World 

War II and Korea." And, as General Herbert B. 

Powell, the Commanding General of the Continental 

Army Command, subsequently reported, "Units 

which had not been expected to become combatready for six months were ready for assignment to 

STRAC [the elite, fast-moving Strategic Army 

Corps] in barely four months. Other units passed 

stiff training tests and were pronounced deployable 

far earlier than had ever been possible in previous 

mobilizations." 

In evidence of these two statements, the two 

mobilized Guard divisions, the 32nd and 49th, were 

assigned to STRAC on February 15, 1962—exactly 

four months after they reported for active duty. 

Actual training time required was three months. 

A major factor in this accomplishment was the 

action, taken by the active Army, to preserve the 

integrity of all mobilized units. Units which had 

trained as a team in State status entered active duty 

as a team and remained intact throughout the mobilization. As a result of this action, the National 

Guard Association of the United States, meeting in 

Las Vegas shortly after the recall, adopted a resolution praising the Army for the way it handled the 

mobilization. 

Once National Guard units were designated as 

combat-ready, detailed plans were formulated for 

their deployment to any location in the world. 

Standard Operating Procedures were developed at 

all levels to support such deployment. 

During the late spring of 1962, most units participated in field exercises and maneuvers. The 

49th Armored Division's participation in Exercise 

IRON DRAGOON was typical of this training. 

This exercise consisted of a 15-day period of active 
field operations for the division and selected support 

units. It included the following type operations: 

a. Road marches for the entire division. 

b. Mass-casualty operations. 

c. Unit replacement action. 

d. Movement to assembly area, passage of 

lines, attack; delay, mobile defense, and counter 

attack. 

e. Aerial resupply operation. 

f. Continuous counter guerrilla warfare. 

During Exercise IRON DRAGOON, extensive 

use was made of aggressor guerrilla forces. These 

guerrillas were members of the 49th Armored Division who had received prior guerrilla training by 

a Special Forces team from Fort Bragg, North Carolina. Extensive use also was made of simulated nuclear weapons by both aggressor and friendly forces. 

One mass casualty evacuation was conducted by the 

division, involving a combat command-size force. 

Aerial resupply was effected twice during the exercise, once to a cut-off infantry company and once to 

the Division Quartermaster Battalion. 

These exercises provided superior training opportunities, giving all units a chance to test unit 

SOPs and to come face-to-face with combat conditions short of being fired at. The time span of the 

exercises was such that all basic supplies were depleted, requiring resupply in the field. Actual field 

conditions were forced upon all units. 

During the summer of 1962, many mobilized 

Army Guard units were assigned the mission of supporting annual active duty and training for other 

ARNG and USAR units. For example, the Reconnaissance Squadron of the 49th Armored Division was assigned the mission of site support battalion for reserve components units training at Fort 

Polk, Louisiana. 

During the latter part of June 1962, Guard 

STRAC units underwent STRAC mobility test exercises to prepare them for immediate overseas deployment. Unit SOPs on preparation for overseas movement were tested down to the last detail. Activities 

during this period ranged from complete administrative processing for each individual to the preparation 

of loading lists for the shipment of all organic equipment. Individual processing included administering 

prescribed immunizations and plans for disposition 

of private automobiles and excess personal effects. 

All units satisfactorily passed the STRAC mobility 

test exercise. 

At the end of the year, Army Guard units were 

continuing to train toward complete operational 

readiness. 

A listing of ARNG units, the date of each unit's 

entry into the active Federal service, the strength at 

which it entered active duty, and its mobilization station appears in Appendix I. 

. . . in the air. 

13 

The Secretary of the Army reviews the troops. 
AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

Largest overseas deployment 

of jets in history 

14 
If ever there was a year in which the Air National Guard met a challenge, fiscal year 1962 was 

it. It also proved a point. 

The challenge, of course, came in the partial 

mobilization for Berlin—the first time Air Guard 

units were ordered to active duty when the nation 

was not actively engaged in military conflict. In 

meeting the challenge, the Air Guard mobilized efficiently, deployed rapidly and performed spectacularly. 

That is, in fact, how the Air Guardsmen proved 

a point. They demonstrated beyond any shadow of 

a doubt a contention that has been the Air Guard 

theme for years—that it is a professional, capable 

and modern force, ever alert and always ready. 

Autumn barely had arrived when on October 1, 

thousands of Air Guardsmen gathered at their widely 

separated bases and heard their respective commanders outline the future—a year, which at that particular time, was wrapped in uncertainty. (See Appendix I for complete unit listing.) 

A month later, on November 1, other Air 

Guardsmen—members of the three F-104 squadrons activated for the crisis—followed the same pattern. 

By that time, however, many of the men who 

had been called in October already had arrived overseas. Less than a month after they had laid aside 

their civilian jobs, 11 of the recalled 25 tactical flying squadrons were in Europe, some virtually at 

Mr. Khrushchev's doorstep. 

In the now famous operation known as "Stairstep," more than 200 Air Guard jets crossed the 

Atlantic in one of the most remarkable demonstrations of readiness in history. This represented the 

largest deployment of jet fighters in the history of the 

Air Force. With little experience in overwater flying, the men who 30 days earlier had been "parttimers" made the demanding flights without a hitch. 

Some went the northern route, through Labrador, 

Greenland and Iceland. The rest took the southern 

route, via Newfoundland and the Azores. And 

when it was all over, every man and every plane 

reached their destination—without a loss and without an accident. In summary, the tactical fighter 

and tactical reconnaissance pilots gave a truly professional performance—one that dictated perfect 

navigation and hair-splitting cruise control techniques. The crossing marked the first time the 

RF-84F had ever been deployed. And the 1,500-

mile trip from Newfoundland to the Azores stretched 

the fuel supply of the F-84Fs to its limits. 

The feat was not accomplished solely by Air 

Guardsmen. The effort represented the consolidated 

accomplishments of a whole host of supporting elements—Air Force, Navy and Coast Guard, plus 

some Air Reservists and Air Guardsmen who had 

not been mobilized. 

This outstanding accomplishment won the 

praises of both Defense Department and Air Force 

officials. Secretary of the Air Force Eugene M. 

Zuckert sent word: 

". . . The manner in which the deployment 

was conducted so soon after recall could only 

be the result of sustained superior performance. 

It is my desire that every man in your organization knows of the pride the whole Air Force 

feels in this accomplishment, which reflects the 

high standard set and maintained in Air National Guard training." 

General Curtis E. LeMay, Air Force Chief of 

Staff, who had visited enroute fields during the deployment and followed the extensive operation 

closely from beginning to end, also had praise for 

Serving with NA TO 
the performance. "I offer my congratulations," he 

told the men, "for the outstanding manner in which 

this difficult and important task was accomplished." 

In early November, the three F-104 units were 

on active duty less than two weeks before they deployed. The Lockheed Starfighters were loaded inside giant Military Air Transport Service C-124 

Globemasters and flown across the water. Less than 

three weeks after their mobilization, these units were 

at their overseas bases and flying alert missions. And 

this performance, too, won the plaudits of top officials. 

Many of the Air Guardsmen overseas were 

members of important aircraft control and warning 

units, outfits which sat right on the Iron Curtain, 

their personnel and equipment scanning the forbidden skies to the East for any "unusual" activity. 

Air Guard weathermen were there also, and they 

proved themselves in spite of the fact they were 

thousands of miles from their normal habitat. 

Although the public attention of the mobilization was focused essentially on the units which were 

dispatched to Europe, other Air Guardsmen who had 

been mobilized carried out significant duties quietly 

and effectively in many different ways. Six Air 

Guard heavy air transport squadrons, for instance, 

remained in the United States. Their routes, however, took them to many foreign lands in both the 

Far East and Europe. 

The mobilized tactical fighter and tactical reconnaissance squadrons which remained in the 

United States stood ready throughout their active 

duty period. They were, in effect, a standby force— 

men and machines honed to the highest effectiveness 

they had ever achieved. And they were ready men 

and machines, capable of moving off to Europe—or 

any other place on the globe—on a moment's notice. New training programs had, in fact, increased 

their mobility potential quite substantially. One of 

the key improvements was air refueling—an added 

1 

-»—*•' """•" m*? ^-i^r 

Scramble 

m 
An Air Guard C-97 flying 

world-wide transport mission 

capability which would have permitted them to fly 

nonstop to Europe. And this was a capability that 

the men in the Kremlin undoubtedly recognized. 

Unfortunately, some Air Guardsmen gave their 

lives during their dedicated pursuit of the ideals that 

make America what it is. While they made the 

supreme sacrifice, many others who had been recalled suffered financial and other setbacks. These 

sacrifices were shared by the men's families, whose 

uncomplaining dedication and support was one of 

the outstanding features of the recall. 

In many respects, the Air Guardsmen demonstrated they were unusually capable at almost any 

task they were given to perform. Overseas, they 

impressed the people in the communities where they 

were stationed. One Guardsman taught the youngsters in Germany to swim and dive. A Negro puppeteer from New Jersey entertained French children. 

A Guardsman-musician wrote church music that may 

be adopted by the Vatican. Guardsmen-teachers established English language courses in many areas. 

Together, they were among the best ambassadors 

in uniform America has ever had. 

On their jobs, they performed magnificently. 

The 151st Fighter-Interceptor Squadron from Tennessee established an all-time monthly flying record 

for the F-104. And they carried out their recordestablishing performance while they were seven airplanes short of a normal inventory. Military Air 

Transport Service units far exceeded the flying expected of them, some of them almost doubling their 

requirements. The MATS units maintained a perfect flying safety record throughout their tour. 

The Air National Guard unquestionably played 

a leading role in staving off another world conflict. 

In doing so, it proved the vital part it plays in the 

nation's defense posture. And it demonstrated that 

it is a first line defense organization, an outfit capable of standing shoulder to shoulder with its professional brothers anytime, anywhere. 

President Kennedy welcoming Air Guardsmen back from Europe 
Mission, Organization and Administration 

MISSIO N OF THE NATIONA L GUAR D 

THE NATIONAL GUARD is rooted in the 

concept of the privilege and responsibility of our 

able-bodied citizens to be ready at all times to bear 

arms for the common defense. This tradition was 

begun in the early seventeenth century, with the development of militia bands in the various colonies. 

The framers of the Constitution recognized the importance of the concept by empowering the Congress to "provide for organizing, arming and disciplining the militia." National military policy subsequently enacted into law has served to enhance the 

availability and improve the readiness of the National Guard as a Federal reserve force. The general policy stated in current law (32 USC 102) is 

quoted: 

In accordance with the traditional military policy of the United States, it is essential 

that the strength and organization of the Army 

National Guard and the Air National Guard as 

an integral part of the first line defenses of the 

United States be maintained and assured at all 

times. Whenever Congress determines that 

more units and organizations are needed for the 

national security than are in the regular components of the ground and air forces, the Army 

National Guard of the United States and the 

Air National Guard of the United States, or 

such parts of them as are needed, together with 

such units of other reserve components as are 

necessary for a balanced force, shall be ordered 

to active Federal duty and retained as long as 

so needed. 

While its Federal reserve potential has been 

strengthened, the National Guard of each State remains constitutionally a State-administered military 

force. The dual State-Federal missions are set forth 

in National Guard Regulation No. 45: 

a. State—To provide units organized, 

equipped, and trained to function efficiently at 

existing strength in the protection of life and 

property and the preservation of peace, order, 

and public safety under competent orders of 

Federal or State authorities. 

b. Federal—To provide trained units 

and qualified individuals available for active 

duty in time of war or national emergency in 

support of the Army's war plans and at such 

other times as the national security may require augmentation of the active forces. 
The Army National Guard In Our 'One Army' 

How the Army National Guard fits into and 

supports the Army mission as "an integral part of the 

first line defenses" is shown on this chart. 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE FIRST LINE DEFENSES' 

At the top is shown the Army's world-wide 

commitments—in Europe, Southeast Asia, Middle 

East, and Korea. 

Next are the Army forces deployed in defense 

of the Continental United States and those prepared 

for early deployment overseas. These include organizations of the Army National Guard, which 

comprise an integral part of these first line defenses. 

First, Air Defense missile units with ARNG NIKEHERCULES and NIKE-AJAX batteries engaged in 

'round-the-clock' defenses of key industrial areas. 

Next the Strategic Army Corps (STRAC) with 

ARNG elements which round out this force; and 

on the right the support base for the entire Army. 

In the bottom arc are shown remaining ARNG 

organizations. On the left are the remaining Army 

National Guard Air Defense NIKE missile units, 

next the Ready Reserve STRAF, made up of seven 

ARNG divisions which would replace STRAC when 

that force is deployed. Next are the eight Infantry 

and Armored Divisions and Non-divisional Combat 

and Combat Support Units of the Contingency Force 

which stand ready to reconstitute the Ready Reserve STRAF and finally, the remaining 12 Combat 

Divisions needed for full mobilization of the Army. 

Air National Guard: A Global Force 

Similarly, the Air National Guard fits into and 

supports U. S. Air Force missions as shown on the 

chart below. 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

GLOBAL CAPABILITY 

At the top are the Air Force's world-wide 

commitments, such as NATO, SEATO, Middle 

East, and the Far East. 

Next are shown the gaining commands to which 

Air Guard units are assigned upon mobilization. 

These include the Tactical Air Command (TAC), 

Air Defense Command (ADC), Military Air Transport Service (MATS), Alaskan Air Command 

(AAC), Air Force Logistics Command (AFLC) 

and the Air Force Communications Service (AFCS). 

In addition, the Hawaii Air National Guard is committed to the Pacific Air Forces (PACAF) and one 

Air Guard communications unit is committed to 

the Air University at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama. 

The bottom line reflects the types of units comprising the ANG force structure. As the arrows indicate, some Air Guard units are serving in peacetime as integral elements of active Air Force commands. For instance, all ANG Fighter-Interceptor 

squadrons assigned to the Air Defense Command 

maintain a 24-hour runway alert at all times under 

ADC control. Air Guard tactical squadrons perform peacetime missions for TAC. ANG Heavy 

Transports carry cargo for MATS. Air Guard 

Ground Electronics Engineering (GEEIA) Squadrons handle communications construction projects 

on USAF missile sites and other bases. 
NATIONA L GUAR D BUREA U 

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE | - "Z ! S " | 

TM r 1 W | KK J 

] 1 

MIII. I jCHItF OF STAFF 1 CHIEF OF SUFll M M | 

CHIEF | 

Ntt 

THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU is both 

a stalf and an operating agency. As the chart shows, 

it is a joint Bureau of the Departments of the Army 

and the Air Force. The Chief, National Guard 

Bureau, reports to the Secretaries of the Army and 

the Air Force through the respective Chiefs of Staff 

and is the principal stall adviser on National Guard 

affairs. 

As an operating agency, the National Guard 

Bureau is the channel of communication between 

the Slates and the Departments of the Army and 

the Air Force. 

The organization of the National Guard Bureau 

is shown on this chart. The Offices of the Assistant 

Chief, Army National Guard, and the Assistant 

Chief, Air National Guard, are similarly organized 

into live divisions each. The Administrative Office 

and the Offices of the Legal Adviser, Public Affairs, 

and Policy and Liaison advise and assist the Chief, 

National Guard Bureau on both Army and Air 

matters. 

The function of the National Guard Bureau is 

to formulate and administer a program for the development and maintenance of Army and Air National Guard units in the several States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the District of 

Columbia, in accordance with Departments of the 

Army and Air Force policy and the dual State and 

Federal missions prescribed in law and regulations. 

The Chief of the National Guard Bureau is 

appointed by the President, with the advice and 

consent of the Senate, from a list of National Guard 

officers recommended by the respective Governors, 

for a term of four years, and is eligible to succeed 

himself. The grade authorized for this position is 

major general. 

The former Chiefs of the National Guard 

Bureau and its predecessor organizations (Division 

of Militia Affairs, 1908-1916, and Militia Bureau, 

1916-1933) are listed in Appendix A. A roster of 

officers on duty in the National Guard Bureau as of 

30 June 1962 is attached as Appendix D. Appendixes B and C, respectively, show the State Adjutants General and United States Property and Fiscal 

Officers as of 30 June 1962. 

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 

ORGANIZATION CHART 

ASS! CHIEF . 

ARM! HC 

COUP I 

DIV 

INSTALL 

DIV I 

1 

0 > T 

DIV 

REUS 

DIV 

CHIEF. NGB 

DEPUTY CH NGB 

ADMIN 

OFFICE 

PII81IC 

AEFAIRS 

liGAE 

ADVISER 

: POLICY 1 

LIAISON 

ASST CHIEF 

AIR 

COHRI 

DIV 

MATERIEL 

|

 DIV

 ! 

« 

CIVIL mi; 

DIV 

oiv 

RERS 

DIV 
MANAGEMEN T IMPROVEMEN T 

Army National Guard 

The Army National Guard in FY 1962 explored possibilities of more mechanization to speed 

up report processing. 

In September 1961 several States requested 

permission to test a system of intercoupling key 

punch capability to accounting machines for more 

efficient preparation of single line requisition cards. 

Complete satisfaction was expressed with the system when installed. 

It was then decided to study this system to determine its adaptability to all forms of reporting. 

Other systems were also studied. Based upon the 

familiarity with the accounting machine system, the 

presence of machines in the field, and the requirement for utilization for other work than reporting, 

it was determined in December 1961 to standardize 

on the intercoupled machine system. 

A machine data collection system test was developed in which several States participated. The 

test involved four types of reports covering all normal 

reporting procedures. 

To introduce the system, an orientation class 

was held in January 1962 where the problems, scope, 

and procedures of the test were outlined. The six 

test States received their machines in March 1962 

and proceeded with formal testing. 

Early in the test it was apparent the system was 

basically sound and problems encountered could be 

solved. Orders for the machines were placed in 

April 1962 and machine installations began in July. 

Orientation meetings were held in each Army 

Area at which time the machines were demonstrated 

and basic reports were reviewed. 

The orientation was modified to include the 

change in requisitioning procedures to the Department of Defense Military Standard Requisitioning 

and Issue Procedures (MILSTRIP) system which 

created several problems among depots, technical 

services and departments. 

By 1 July the system was being used for the 

preparation of MILSTRIP requisitions. 

Several additional reports now prepared in NGB 

appear to be readily transferable to machine intercoupling. Further implementation is desirable since 

the system will save the Bureau time in consolidating 

data from the 52 reporting jurisdictions. The time 

saved can be spent in more thorough analysis of 

data reported. From experience gained in initial tests 

of these intercoupled machines, additional reports 

will be revised and tested prior to national implementation. This testing system was extremely beneficial in insuring accurate and logical reporting instructions during FY 1962 and will continue as the 

standard procedure for installing new reporting forms 

and methods. 

Air National Guard 

The major activity affecting manpower and organization during this period was the October 1961 

mobilization of certain of our Air National Guard 

units. As to be expected, many problems attended 

this action. Not the least of these was the requirement to develop "up-to-date" manning documents 

on very short notice. The difficulty of this task was 

compounded by the need to realign several units 

at the last minute to provide uniform aircraft and 

equipment inventories. In one case, for example, 

transfer of the 120th Tactical Fighter Squadron, 

Colo., and the 136th Tactical Fighter Squadron, 

N.Y., to the 1 13th Tactical Fighter Wing, District of 

Columbia, was necessitated to realize a full F-100-

equipped wing. In another case, three ANG F-104 

squadrons assigned to the Air Defense Command 

were called up as Tactical Air Command fighter 

units, demanding realignment of these units on a 

nearly "crash" basis. 

Reflecting the initiative and spirit of cooperation of the mobilized units, this mobilization was 

highly successful, despite the problems encountered. 

The National Guard Bureau has been alert to opportunities to improve the processes by which units 

are called to active duty, and several important management improvements in the manpower and organization area were implemented during the period of 

this report. 

One major step was taken following a Bureau 

recommendation that the gaining commands develop manpower authorization files and publish unit 

manning documents to apply to assigned ANG units 

in the event of mobilization. Under this proposal, 

mobilization documents would be developed on a 

quarterly basis in the same manner that documents 

are prepared for active force units. These will serve 

as "blue prints" for mobilization purposes and will 

be revised and brought up-to-date in accordance with 
changes occurring in official war plans. Wide support was given this proposal which was implemented on 16 Feb 1962 by publication of AFR 

26-5, subject, "Air Reserve Forces Unit Manpower 

Authorization Policy and Procedures." Under this 

program, gaining commands will now be in a constant state of preparedness for future mobilizations. 

In cooperation with the gaining Commands' 

plans for publication of manning documents for mobilization purposes, the National Guard Bureau has 

streamlined its machinery for development of manning documents for inactive duty status. For its 

part, the National Guard Bureau will insure that 

unit manning documents issued for peacetime recruiting purposes will be as closely aligned with the needs 

of the gaining commands as is possible. To facilitate the manpower and organization process within 

the ANG during inactive duty status, all policy, guidance and instructional material has been consolidated into a single publication entitled the Air National Guard Manpower and Organization Handbook. 

This booklet, distributed to all states and units at 

the annual commanders' conference, is designed to 

simplify the all-important contribution of individual 

ANG units in the preparation of Unit Manning Documents. Conduct of the manpower process under the 

purview of this publication by the Air National 

Guard in conjunction with implementation of AFR 

26-5 by the gaining commands should insure a 

smooth and orderly transition to active duty status 

in future mobilizations. 

Prompted by the evidence that the organizational structure of ANG units was incompatible in 

some instances with the requirements of the gaining 

commands, a re-evaluation of the organizational concepts of the ANG has been accomplished. While 

the active forces conform to a single wing base structure of similarly equipped units, ANG forces do 

not. Consequently, desired standardization within 

the ANG of similar units could not exist under the 

present organizational structure. The principal deviation occurs within squadron organizations located 

remote from the parent wing. This situation is most 

prevalent within ANG units assigned to MATS and 

to TAC and necessitates heavy "augmentation" of 

such units to assure self support. 

As a consequence, the National Guard Bureau 

recommended to the gaining commands that the 

"augmented" squadron concept be discarded in favor 

of "Group" status for these units. While there will 

be many ramifications to such a reorganization which 

must be carefully evaluated, important benefits can 

be obtained. Among these will be increased flexibility and selectivity in the manner in which Air 

National Guard units can be called to active duty 

in future mobilizations. Considerable support has 

been given to this proposal by the major commands. 

Headquarters USAF's approval of the group organizational structure in lieu of augmented squadrons 

for affected TAC and MATS units was pending at 

the end of this reporting period. 

Generally, the manpower and organizational 

problems which occurred during the mobilization 

have had a beneficial effect. The resolution of these 

problems has brought about a closer, more enlightened, more cooperative relationship between the Air ^ 

National Guard and the respective gaining commands. 

L E G I SL A CTE D 

Appropriations 

The 87th Congress enacted Public Law 87-144, 

the Department of Defense Appropriation Act for 

fiscal year 1962. and Public Law 87-302, the Military Construction Appropriation Act, for FY 1962. 

Several other bills directly affecting the National 

Guard were enacted during fiscal year 1962. A summary of the more important legislation follows: 

Partial Mobilization during the Berlin Crisis 

Public Law 87-117 authorized the President, 

until 1 July 1962, to order not more than 250.000 of 

the Ready Reserve to active duty for not more than 

12 consecutive months, and to "freeze" enlistments 

that would have expired before 1 July 1962 for 

not more than 12 months. The President, by Executive Order No. 10957, dated 10 August 1961, author-
ized the Secretary of Defense to order units to active 

duty after prior approval, and to extend enlistments 

as provided by PL 87-117. 

Personnel 

P. L. 87-165 provides that service performed 

by an individual under a minority enlistment is creditable in determining eligibility for retirement and in 

computing the amount of retired pay. 

P. L. 87-224 authorizes the withholding from 

National Guard technician payrolls of the required 

employee's contribution to State operated or sponsored life and health and accident insurance plans. 

It also authorizes a contribution of Federal funds 

to State retirement systems which include technicians 

in their retirement programs. The contribution may 

not exceed 6V2 percent of the technician's compensation, this being the basis upon which contributions to 

the Federal Civil Service Retirement Fund are made 

on behalf of Federal employees. In cases where 

the Federal Government is contributing the OASI 

employer's tax, that amount must be included within 

the 6'/2 percent maximum. 

P. L. 87-378 provides that members of the National Guard who enlist after 4 October 1962 prior 

Among the bills of importance pending on 30 

June 1962 were the following: 

H.R. 11221, (subsequently enacted into law as 

P.L. 87-531). It increases basic allowance for quarters, makes permanent increases for E-4's with over 

four years service and higher enlisted grades, and 

authorizes Dependents Assistance Act quarters allowances to E-4's with four years service and lower 

grades while on full-time training duty of 30 days or 

over (except during the initial period of active duty 

for training). Allotments are not required during 

these periods. The law is effective 1 January 1963. 

H.R. 4774. The bill would authorize medical 

and hospital care, and pay and allowances for members injured en route to, or from inactive duty training. 

H.R. 4792. The bill would clarify the laws relating to operation of National Guard schools, and 

to attaining age 26 are subject to priority induction, 

or to 45 days active duty for training if they fail to 

participate satisfactorily in training. The Act also 

authorizes flexible periods of enlistment, and extensions of enlistment in the National Guard. Lastly, 

it provides that military leave for Federal employees 

is to be granted on a calendar rather than a fiscal 

year basis. 

P. L. 87-391 creates several classes of reemployment rights for members who perform training 

duty. Members on active duty after 1 August 1961 

have reemployment rights if that duty does not exceed four years and they apply within 90 days of 

release from duty or hospitalization. Members ordered to initial active duty for training for not less 

than three consecutive months are entitled to reemployment if they apply within 31 days of release, 

or hospitalization, and may not be discharged within 

six months except for cause. Members performing 

other full-time training or inactive duty training 

are entitled to reemployment if they report for work 

at the beginning of the next regularly scheduled 

working period following their release. Reasonable 

delays and hospitalization extend the time for application for reemployment. 

extend the coverage of section 502 of title 32, United 

States Code, to cover such additional training, with 

or without pay, as the Secretary of the Army or the 

Secretary of the Air Force may authorize. 

H.R. 7276. The bill would extend the benefits 

of the Federal Civil Service Retirement Act, the 

Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Act and 

the Federal Health Benefits Act to National Guard 

technicians. 

H.R. 8785. The bill would remove the 6V2 

percent maximum ceiling on Federal contributions 

to State retirement systems, and permit the contribution of the employer's cost as fixed by State law, 

without regard to OASI contributions. 

H.R. 11520. The bill would permit the retention in an active status, until age 60, of technicians 

in the grades of lieutenant colonel and colonel who 

would otherwise be eliminated by reason of length 

of service or time in grade. 

PENDIN G LEGISLATIO N 
PUBLI C AFFAIR S PROGRA M 

T HE PUBLIC AFFAIRS program of the National Guard Bureau has two goals—first to recruit 

and retain National Guard personnel and second, to 

keep the public informed on the missions and accomplishments of the Guard. These two objectives 

necessarily overlap. During FY 1962, with the recruiting requirement down, much of our effort was 

directed toward informing the public on the activities 

of Army and Air National Guardsmen called to active 

duty in the Berlin crisis. 

Some of the program was carried out on a national level—perhaps more than usual this year because the mobilization had substantial national interest. As in the past, however, the Bureau concentrated 

on providing materials and guidance to help the 

several States conduct their own recruiting and publicity programs. 

Recruiting efforts were intensified during the 

latter months of FY 1962 in order to have enough 

men trained and ready to join the units coming off 

active duty to replace those who would leave at the 

end of their extended enlistments. 

Much of this year's program was devoted to 

informing the public on the magnificent response of 

the National Guard, both Army and Air, to the challenge presented by the Berlin mobilization. This 

included separate mobilization and demobilization 

publicity programs and extended efforts to publicize 

the specific efforts of Guardsmen on active duty and 

in the States. 

A total of $465,000 from Federal appropriations was expended during the fiscal year. Almost 

all of that amount was contracted to a commercial 

advertising agency for the development and production of print, radio and television materials to be distributed to the States, and to stations throughout the 

country for free public service support for the Army 

and Air National Guard. 

The first Air National Guard units placed on 

priority status were permitted to enlist prior-service 

personnel only. A press, radio and TV recruiting 

kit was assembled designed to recruit these men. 

This included newspaper mats, pictures, printed spot 

announcements, slides suitable for television with a 

recorded message from Major General Winston P. 

Wilson, Deputy Chief of the Bureau, and a letter 

suggesting recruiting activities and methods of distribution. This kit was distributed to the unit commanders of priority units. 

To publicize the achievements of the mobilization, several articles appearing in national magazines 

and The Congressional Record were reprinted in 

quantity and distributed: (1 ) New Yorker—Story of 

the 32nd Infantry Division, Wisconsin National 

Guard, was reprinted in 50,000 copies; (2) Time— 

an article concerning principally the mobilization of 

the 32nd, was reprinted in 12,000 copies; (3) "Operation Stairstep," Reader's Digest—an article describing the deployment of Air Guard units to Europe 

was reprinted in 27,000 copies; (4) Congressional 

Record—One thousand copies of a speech by Congressman L. Mendel Rivers (D-S. C.) concerning the 

deployment to Europe were printed—this same 

speech along with several other comments from 

Senators and Congressmen was reprinted in 30,000 

copies. 

Articles on the mobilization also appeared in 

Life magazine, the New York Times Magazine, VFW 

magazine and the Legionnaire magazine, among many 

others. 

Full-page advertisements for the National Guard 

appeared in the Saturday Evening Post, and Newsweek magazine published a mobilization advertisement, "The Man Who Took Your Place." Ten thousand reprints of this last item were distributed to the 

States. 

THE HOME TEAM I! 

$m$mimmw&\KVim 

Special forces Poster 
During the year various other printed materials 

were developed and distributed. "Aids That Newspapers Like," was a catalogue of print materials 

(newspaper mats, pictures, etc.) available from the 

Bureau for unit-level publicity campaigns. For the 

States (Information Officers and unit commanders), 

this 20-page booklet summarized the inventory of 

materials available for their use. 

An Air National Guard recruiting program resulted in shipment to the States and to Air Force 

separation centers of 500,000 copies of the pamphlet '"The Air National Guard." Twenty-five thousand Air Guard window display posters, "The Sky's 

the Limit," went to the States, as well as 4,000 

printed radio spot announcements. 

A press kit on "Talking Bird," the Air Guard's 

flying command post, was developed and distributed. 

One of the largest and most important projects of 

the year was production and distribution of Demobilization Kits sent to 10,500 newspapers, 4,200 radio 

stations, 550 televisipn stations and 2,600 National 

ELC0ME HOME NATIONAL GUARDSMEN 

Guard community project officers. The kits to the 

different media were basically the same except that 

matted material was sent to the newspapers, slides 

to the television stations, and printed spots to the 

radio stations. The kits included Army and Air 

mobilization fact sheets and troop lists, news stories 

and editorials, suggested advertisements welcoming 

home the mobilized units, and a suggested proclamation. The kits were designed primarily to point up 

the Guard's contribution during the Berlin crisis and 

to help communities in their efforts to welcome home 

the Guardsmen. They also contributed substantially 

to our retention and recruiting program. 

Another business and industry relations campaign was conducted during FY 1962. A booklet 

was developed entitled "The National Guard Is Your 

Business" and was distributed by the National Guard 

Bureau to the presidents of 2,600 leading business 

firms in the United States to help insure that the 

employers of the members of the National Guard 

understand and support the citizen-soldier concept. 

Another 45,000 copies of this booklet were printed 

for further distribution to the leading businesses and 

industries of each State. 
"Kentucky Mounted Riflemen" 

The Bureau produced and distributed 50,000 

copies of "Your Career as an Officer" to every officer 

in the Army National Guard. Among other pamphlets given to the States were 25,000 copies of the 

"Guardsman's Guide to Basic Training" and 9,000 

copies of the "I Am The Guard" comic book (both 

in their second year), 10,000 copies of "The Influence of Press Relations on High Command," 250,-

000 copies of "Take Six," also in its second year. 

In addition several thousand copies of "Welcome 

Aboard Your National Guard Militia-Mobile" were 

mailed to the States which used the Civil War display 

bus. 

Historical Paintings 

The second painting in the National Guard 

Heritage series was completed this year. (See center 

"Lafayette's Farewell to the Guard" 

1 lllfS 

section.) This painting, by Mr. Ken Riley who 

produced the first in the series (". . . The Whites 

of Their Eyes"), is entitled "The Mississippi Rifles." 

It depicts what is now the 155th Infantry of the 

Mississippi National Guard in the battle of Buena 

Vista, Mexico, in 1847 during the Mexican War. 

Mr. Riley also completed paintings three and 

four in the series. The third painting, tentatively 

entitled "Lafayette's Farewell to the Guard," shows 

Lafayette saying good-bye to the National Guards 

Battalion, now the 107th Regiment, New York National Guard, at the end of his triumphal visit to the 

United States in 1824. This unit was the first to 

use the name National Guard. It was so named 

upon Lafayette's arrival in America in honor of his 

old unit, the "Garde Nationale." 

The fourth painting, tentatively entitled "Remember the River Raisin!" depicts the Kentucky 

Mounted Riflemen in a battle on the Thames in 

upper Canada in 1838 during the War of 1812. 

This was a highlight victory of the war in which the 

Riflemen defeated a greatly superior force of British. 

The first painting in the series, ". . . The Whites 

of Their Eyes" received the ultimate honor when 

President Kennedy accepted the original for hanging in the White House. This painting was presented 

by General McGowan, Chief, National Guard Bureau, on behalf of all Army and Air Guardsmen in 

a ceremony attended by the Secretaries of the Army 

and Air Force, the Chief of Staff of the Army, the 

Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and many other 

ranking officers of the Army and Air Force, as well 

as congressional representatives from Massachusetts. 
Militia-Mobile 

The mobile bus display depicting the role of the 

militia in the Civil War which was constructed last 

year for use at re-enactments and other observances 

throughout the period of the Civil War Centennial 

was on display at the re-enactment of the Battle of 

First Manassas (Bull Run) in Manassas, Virginia; 

at state fairs in Ohio, Kentucky, Virginia, and North 

Carolina, and for tours of New Jersey, Massachusetts, 

Rhode Island, and Vermont. It was also displayed 

in South Carolina at the commemoration of the 

Battle of Port Royal Sound. Other locations scheduled from July 1962 through November included 

Delaware, Pennsylvania, New York, and Maine. 

Radio 

Principally as a result of the survey of 1,250 

radio stations conducted last year in an attempt to 

determine the most effective types of future programming for the Guard,, major changes were made in 

National Guard radio programming produced by 

the Bureau. 

The format and name of the principal radio activity was changed. This is a weekly 15-minute show 

distributed to stations for free public service presentation. The previous title, "Let's Go To Town," and 

the Armory audience format with whistles and cheers 

were dropped in favor of a more relaxed, informal 

style called "Guard Session." The new host. Martin 

Block, one of the nation's preeminent disc jockeys, 

conversed with well-known performers during the 

recording session. 

Another major change was from a 16-inch to a 

12-inch disc. In addition, station survey and monthly 

mailing were transferred from a manual to an IBM 

operation. 

"Guard Session" was kicked off with a promotion kit which included a 7-inch disc of Martin Block 

introducing the new format as well as some of the 

music and well-known personalities scheduled. 

These major changes and this promotion effort 

resulted in acceptance of the show by some 2,300 

radio stations; an increase from 1,580 in FY 1961 

of 46%. Further, these 2,300 represent 66% coverage of all radio stations in the United States. 

Listeners to "Guard Session" this year heard 

some of the top names in show business. They include: 

Keely Smith with Nelson Riddle 

The Four Preps with Si Zentner 

Andy Williams and Les Paul and Mary Ford 

Anita Bryant with Les Brown 

Jo Stafford with Paul Weston 

Tex Beneke, Ray Eberle and The Modernaires 

Delia Reese with Duke Ellington 

Tony Bennett with Gene Krupa 

Sarah Vaughn with Woody Herman 

Steve Lawrence with Skitch Henderson 

From these shows, selections were taken to 

form the 12-show summer series, "Guard Session 

All-Star Review," again with Martin Block as master 

of ceremonies. 

General Wilson, Dep. Chief, NGB, Honoring Guy Lombardo 

The Air Guard show, "Lombardoland, U.S.A.," 

was continued for the eleventh consecutive year. 

Featuring the popular Guy Lombardo, this series 

of weekly half-hour shows is broadcast by more than 

250 stations of the Mutual Broadcasting System. 27 

resident Kennedy Accepting Original Painting of "The Whites of Their Eyes" 

•om General McGowan, CNGB. 
Brig. Gen. Willard W. Millikan of DCs 113th Tac. Ftr 

Wing presents an award to bandleader Si Zentner. 

Television and Motion Pictures 

The series of 10 "Inside Basketball" shows featuring Bud Wilkinson and the U. S. Olympic Championship Basketball team in a 15-minute TV program 

continued its second successful year. 

In recognition of his public service to the National 

Guard, Guy Lombardo was presented with a Guardsman Award Plaque by Major General Winston P. 

Wilson, Deputy Chief of the National Guard Bureau, 

at a ceremony held at the Shoreham Hotel in Washington, D. C. 

The artists who recorded "Guard Session" contributed to a radio spot announcement record singing 

National Guard "Jingles" and urging young men 

to join the Guard. These "spots" were sent to every 

station in the U.S. In addition, every radio station 

received monthly printed spot announcements, ten, 

30, and 60 seconds in length. 

28 

On a limited basis, a series of three recordings 

featuring "open-end" interviews with well-known 

personalities was distributed to about 500 stations. 

These were designed for "disc-jockey" programs so 

that the local announcer, by reading the prepared 

script, could conduct an interview with the celebrities 

as though they were in the studio. 

Finally, as an experiment, "Guard Session" show 

number 36 was produced in compatible monauralstereophonic sound and mailed, with a survey card, 

to the regular "Guard Session" stations to find out 

how many of them were interested in this type of 

recording. 

"One 

of 

the 

top 

TV 

Commercials" 

t 1 Itl'll [( Al l l) | KJ ( (ll. M I l(I\ 

• 

The second and third installments in the "two 

little fellas" animated spot announcement series, the 

first of which won high honors in the American 

Television Commercials Festival, were distributed to 

television stations and were widely used. 

"Take Command," a motion picture narrated 

by Gregory Peck, was produced to support a campaign to recruit personnel for State Officer Candidate 

Schools. The Army's television series, "The Big 

Picture," adapted the film for one of its programs and 

scheduled it for viewing this fall. 

"For the Record," a 12Vi-minute documentary 

film on the Army and Air Guard mobilization, narrated by Walter Cronkite, was used extensively by 

local TV stations in connection with demobilization 
"For the Record" film flyer 

activities. This was distributed to the States on the 

basis of one print for every two television stations. 

Wide television coverage was given the mobilization by the networks and local stations. On a national level, "We the People," "Today" and "The 

Eyewitness" shows all devoted programs or segments 

of their time to the National Guard mobilization and 

demobilization. 

Information Planning Group 

In May 1962, the National Guard Bureau Information Planning Group held its third annual session. The group included Colonel James B. Deerin, 

New Jersey, Chairman; Major William Davidson, 

New York; Lt. Col. Charles Manooch, North Carolina; Major Richard F. Shelley, Missouri; and Major 

Arthur Swan, Utah. The planners reviewed the 

FY 1962 program with National Guard Bureau and 

agency personnel and laid plans for FY 1963 and 

future programs. 

Answering Public Inquiries 

A very important Public Affairs activity includes 

liaison with members of Congress, military and other 

Federal government agencies, State and local officials, 

and private citizens to provide answers to inquiries 

on virtually all aspects of National Guard organization, personnel, installations, equipment, and operations. 

In addition, letters to Congress are initiated 

in the Bureau relative to outstanding achievements 

of individual Guardsmen. This includes Guardsmen 

who receive outstanding honors while attending Service schools and United States Property and Fiscal 

Officers and State Maintenance Officers who receive 

superior inspection ratings. 

Other Activities 

The Office of Public Affairs, National Guard 

Bureau, took part in many other important activities 

which do not come under the preceding categories. 

Air Guard Demobilization 

By direction of Secretary of the Air Force Eugene M. Zuckert, the Air National Guard was encouraged to cover the homecoming of their mobilized 

units in every way possible. A local project officer 

was assigned who coordinated the arrangements for 

ceremonies, parades, press conferences, and radioTV interviews with returnees. General Wilson, 

Deputy Chief, National Guard Bureau, attended as 

many of these ceremonies as possible. 

Secretary of the Air Force 

Zuckert welcoming First Air 

Guardsmen home from Europe 

*& *-*.*,¥#« 
In addition, prior to the Air Guardsmen's return, a professional television director and a writer. 

Captain Joseph E. Patrick, Arizona, and First Lieutenant Brian Kelly, Virginia, both Air Guardsmen 

on active duty, were sent to Europe where they made 

160 radio and television interviews with mobilized 

Air Guardsmen at eleven locations. This film and 

tape, with the copy, was quite useful during the demobilization. The appropriate interviews were sent 

to the States for local TV and radio consumption. 

The stories and still photos were offered to national 

magazines. 

Homecoming in Platleville, Wise. 

30 

Army Guard Demobilization 

On the Army side, every effort was made to 

aid the States in publicizing the homecomings, principally in the form of press, radio and TV demobilization kits previously discussed. On the national level, 

it was decided to concentrate on a single symbolic 

community to publicize the entire National Guard 

homecoming. The town chosen was Platteville, Wisconsin. Under the guidance of project officer, First 

Lieutenant Robert Bjorklund, a member of Wisconsin's 32nd Division on active duty, arrangements 

were made for an all-out celebration including a 

parade and a ceremony featuring addresses by important State and national dignitaries. This homecoming was covered by the "Army Hour" radio program, CBS's "EYEWITNESS." the half-hour network television program, and numerous press and 

radio representatives throughout the country. 

Mobilization Recognition 

In recognition of the service and sacrifice of 

the mobilized Army and Air National Guardsmen, 

the Office of Public Affairs and the several States 

compiled the names and addresses of the 66,000 

mobilized Guardsmen. All of these names and addresses were then reproduced by various methods and 

distributed to the Congressmen and Senators of the 

States to which they were returning. Hundreds of 

favorable replies were received from Congressmen 

to whom the lists were sent—most of these stating 

that letters of appreciation from them were being 

sent to the individual returnees. 

Physical Fitness 

Voluntary active support of the President's 

Youth Fitness Program was initiated during the last 

half of the fiscal year. Working directly with Bud 

Wilkinson, the President's advisor on Youth Fitness, 

the National Guard Bureau urged the States to 

promote physical fitness programs in their State and 

local community school systems. The National 

Guard Bureau also initiated plans for physical fitness 

programs in National Guard units. 

Bud Wilkinson spoke to the Adjutants General 

Conference in New York City asking them to support 

the President's program. The Adjutants General 

unanimously voted to support the program and appointed a Physical Fitness Committee to work with 

the National Guard Bureau and the States. 

Historical Activities 

Other activities included the maintenance of 

historical documents for use in information programs 

and as an aid to scholars and military writers, the 

supervision of the heraldic and insignia programs 

of the Army and Air National Guard, and the promulgation of information relating to policy in the 

fields of insignia and historical material. 

Other Information Support 

Throughout the year in the regular course of its 

activities the Public Affairs Office handled numerous 

news releases, speeches, periodical and encyclopedia 

articles, and other materials cleared or released 

through the Departments of Army, Air Force, and 

Defense. 

Representatives from the Public Affairs Office 

attended or provided information support to various 

conferences and events throughout the year, including the National Rifle and Pistol Matches at Camp 

Perry, Ohio, the Air National Guard Ricks Trophy 

event at the Air Force Association Conference at 

Las Vegas, Nevada, the Adjutants General Association Conference in New York City, and the National 

Guard Association Conference in Denver, Colorado. 
TROPHIE S AN D AWARD S PROGRA M 

The purpose of the trophies and awards program is to instill a spirit of wholesome rivalry among 

individuals, units, and organizations of the Army and 

Air National Guard and to stimulate their interest in 

such activities as marksmanship, technical proficiency 

in training, and maintenance. To this end, trophies 

and awards are given annually by the Chief, National 

Guard Bureau, and other sponsoring agencies to outstanding personnel and units in both the Army and 

the Air National Guard. 

The National Guard Bureau is the coordinating 

agency for activities conducted under this program. 

Pamphlets and letters announcing trophy and award 

winners are published after each competition. Supplementary information is made available for release 

to the press. 

Army National Guard personnel compete annually in rifle and pistol marksmanship at State, 

Army Area, and National levels under the sponsorship of affiliated organizations, including the Military 

Police Association, the National Rifle Association, 

the National Board for the Promotion of Rifle Practice, the National Guard Association of the United 

States, and the Association of the United States 

Army. In 1962, 23 State pistol teams and 43 State 

rifle teams composed of both Army and Air National 

Guard members participated in the National Matches 

held at Camp Perry, Ohio. 

The following trophies and awards are described 

in Appendix E: 

Army National Guard 

National Guard Association Trophy, Pershing 

Trophy and National Guard (State) Trophy 

National Rifle Association Trophy 

Chief of the National Guard Bureau Trophy 

Military Police Team Pistol Trophy 

Eisenhower Trophy 

United States Army Air Defense Commander's 

Trophy 

Erickson Trophy 

Association of the United States Army Award 

Air National Guard 

Spaatz Trophy 

Winston P. Wilson Trophy 

Air Force Association Outstanding Unit Trophy 

National Guard Association Trophy (Air) 

Air Force Association Outstanding Airman 

Award 

Earl T. Ricks Memorial Trophy 
REGULATION S 

In the administration of National Guard affairs, 

National Guard Regulations and Air National Guard 

Regulations govern the National Guard when not in 

Federal service. These regulations announce the 

approved policies of the Department of the Army 

and Department of the Air Force pertaining to the 

Army and Air National Guard. Also, certain Army 

and Air Force Regulations govern the Army and 

Air National Guard when specifically applied by the 

Chief, National Guard Bureau. 

During the FY 1962, the Chief, National Guard 

Bureau, revised a number of existing regulations, 

covering administration, personnel, training and logistical matters. In addition. NGB Pamphlets and 

Air National Guard letters which amplify the regulations were revised. A detailed resume is contained 

in Appendix F. 

PUBLICATION S REVIE W BOAR D 

Some $925,000 was programmed for FY 1962 

for Department of the Army publications and blank 

forms (Program 7413). To meet mobilization 

needs, an additional $270,000 was later added to 

the program for procurement of many additional 

publications and forms. During the year, reorganizations were effected throughout the Army National 

Guard; e.g., conversion of 90-mm Antiaircraft Gun 

Battalions to Engineer. Automatic Weapons, Armor, 

and Artillery Battalions. Other factors generating 

need for the additional funds were the publishing of 

ROAD (Reorganization of Army Divisions) publications, start of conversion of NIKE-AJAX units 

to NIKE-HERCULES, organization of NIKE-HERCULES Battalions in Texas and Missouri, preparation for "Operation TAPER," and issuance of new 

or substitute items of equipment which replaced 

items turned in to the active Army during the Berlin 

build-up; e.g., turn-in of H-13 aircraft and receipt 

of H-23s, etc. 

On 30 January 1962, Change 1 to National 

Guard Regulation 2-2 was published. This change 

explained policies and procedures for submission of 

Department of the Army Form 12 series, "Requisition for Initial Distribution of Publications and Blank 

Forms," to the respective U. S. Army Adjutant General Publications Centers having a single-manager responsibility for certain type publications. It also diGuardsman Checks State Publication Stock Room 

rected that "on-site" missile units and certain other 

selected units as may be designated by the Chief, 

National Guard Bureau, will procure and maintain 

publications and forms for mobilization as indicated 

in Army Regulation 135-300. 

The Department of the Army instituted new 

procedures to improve pinpoint distribution of publications on missile, atomic, special weapons, aviation and administrative subjects. States are now 

receiving, on Initial Distribution (ID), requirements 

for these publications in accordance with recorded 

requirements on Department of the Army Form 12 

series. The Army Adjutant General Publications 

Center, St. Louis, Missouri, has sole responsibility 

for missile, atomic, special weapons and aviation type 

publications and forms, while the Alexandria. Virginia. Center has responsibility for administrative 

publications. 
STAT E SERVIC E 

Throughout its long history the National Guard 

of the several States has assisted in times of State 

and local emergencies. During FY 1962, the Guard 

again responded in all types of State services, including snow emergencies, search and rescue, floods, 

storms, and other disasters. The cost of these activities was borne entirely by the States. The following 

accounts are typical of State services rendered by the 

National Guard. 

Snow Emergencies 

In the mountainous area of New Mexico, the 

season's first big snow storm coincided with the 

opening of deer season. A high-speed rescue effort 

made by Army National Guardsmen and State police 

averted catastrophe for nearly 500 hunters trapped 

by the three-foot snowfall and ten-foot drifts. Lacking more appropriate equipment, Guardsmen from 

Roswell, Artesia, Carlsbad, Alamogordo, Albuquerque, and Truth or Consequences, smashed through 

the snow in trucks and jeeps to reach remote areas. 

Three of the units set up their base of operations at 

a centrally located ranch, sleeping in the back of 

their trucks and fanning out each day to comb the 

snow-clogged valleys for hunters. The Guardsmen, 

carrying emergency food in their trucks, also broke 

through to isolated ranches, and at one found 18 

hunters who had taken shelter with the ranger. All 

the food was gone except for the hunters' venison 

shot before the snow hit. Other Guardsmen were busy 

pulling cars and trailers out of snowdrifts. A detail 

from Headquarters & Headquarters Battery, 1st Gun 

Battalion, 200th Artillery, of Artesia, assisted nearly 

100 hunters to safety along one stretch of Highway 

24 near Pinon only a few hours after leaving their 

armory. One State official commented that the rescue of many would have been "impossible" without 

the Guardsmen. 

In California's high Sierras, a hugh cornice of 

ice and snow threatened to fall and block a mile-long 

section of transcontinental Highway 50. A crew from 

the 2d Battle Group, 184th Infantry, taking a calculated risk, brought their jeep-mounted 105mm recoiless rifle through the danger area to where their 

ammunition had been transported, figuring it would 

be safer to do this than ask a state-employed trucker 

to drive through to them. Six well-placed shots 

brought down the dangerous overhang of snow. 

And across the continent in mountainous western Pennsylvania, 28th Infantry Division aviators, 

working with Air Scouts, set up their own emergency 

airlift of grain for the second successive year, dumping bagful after bagful to save an estimated 700 deer 

faced with starvation when their forage was covered 

by several feet of snow. 33 
Search and Rescue 

An Alaska Air Guard ski-equipped plane rescued a team of Arctic researchers from sure death 

on an ice floe in the Arctic Ocean. The researchers" 

twin-engine plane had failed due to a fuel mixup. 

With 11 persons on board the engines quit and the 

pilot brought the plane down undamaged on an ice 

floe, 500 miles from land. After being located by 

an Air Force pilot—who dropped sleeping bags and 

and other supplies—three Air Guardsmen, Major 

Dean L. Stringer, Major Thomas E. Norris, and MSgt 

William E. Christy, Jr., all full-time Air Guardsmen 

from the 144th Air Transport Squadron, flew their 

ski-equipped CI23J, timing their flight to reach the 

ice floe during the brief mid-day period of semidaylight. Flying cover for them was the Air Force 

pilot who originally spotted the missing plane. By 

evening, 48 hours after their forced landing, all the 

stranded Arctic researchers were thawing-out at Point 

Barrow. 

Flood 

On 18 July 1961, a thunderstorm brought six 

inches of rain within a few hours to the narrow 

Kanawha Valley, W. Va., causing a sudden flood 

which brought death to 22 persons and disaster to 

nearby Charleston. Before midnight, a disaster task 

force of Guardsmen, ordered into active State service, was in full operation to assist the stricken areas, 

working around-the-clock duty for six days. Units 

of the 150th Armored Cavalry from Charleston, 

St. Albans, Dunbar, and Montgomery were part 

of the State forces, and 85 airmen from the 130th 

Troop Carrier Squadron volunteered to help with 

the cleanup without pay. ARNG units throughout 

the State furnished additional equipment and technical teams. Within a few hours after rescue, medical 

assistance, and security activities began, flood victims were receiving emergency aid. A water purification plant was set up by the 1092d Engineer Battalion, field kitchens were functioning, feeding over 

1,500 people daily. And Army aviators were flying 

reconnaissance missions. Guard medical personnel 

conducted a typhoid inoculation clinic in conjunction with the County Health Department. Needed 

transportation was supplied and equipment delivered 

for the clean-up job. The area was declared a National Disaster Area, and civilian agencies assumed 

the responsibilities that the West Virginia Guardsmen had fulfilled for six days. 

34 
Mississippi National Guardsmen saved the lives 

and homes of many in a battle against the State's 

rain-swollen streams. On 17 December 1961, the 

first of over 635 Guardsmen reported for duty to join 

the volunteer crews on levees and in the inundated 

area. Day and night, through freezing rain and 

sleet, Guardsmen worked 12 to 18-hour shifts putting sandbags on sagging levees and using DUKWS 

to rescue stranded citizens. Among the 25 Guard 

units that had men who fought to save Jackson and 

surrounding area, was the 183d Aeromedical Transport Squadron. Air Guardsmen fed the cold, exhausted workers from kitchens set up in one of the 

armories. Guardsmen from almost every branch of 

service joined together to win the fight and by the 

26th of December, 'most Guardsmen were going 

home to see their families for the first time since 

the Christmas holiday began. "Without the National 

Guard, all would have been lost," declared Mayor 

Chastaine Flynt of Flowood. 

In Idaho, a quick thaw caused an $18-million 

flood across the southeastern part of the State. 

Dikes, diversion dams and canals were giving way; 

a state of emergency was declared. Calls from 10 

counties for assistance were pouring in and within 

a few hours over 650 National Guardsmen were 

responding. Members of the 2d Squadron, 116th 

Armored Cavalry, at Pocatello removed 36 patients 

from a rest home to Pocatello hospitals. A demolition team from the 116th Armored Cavalry set off 

more than 120 charges to relieve water pressure 

caused by ice jams. Make-shift dikes were reinforced, communications lines were maintained, and 

patrols guarded against looting. An ARNG helicopter flew mail and food to residents of Lava Hot 

Springs. The waters began to recede and on the 

fourth day Guardsmen were released, many of them 

to return to flood-damaged property of their own. 

Governor Smylie declared that the Guard's immediate response to the State's call "was in the highest 

tradition of the National Guard as an organization 

available to the State in the event of an emergency." 

Storms 

In Florida, a tornado struck and within minutes 

15 persons were dead and scores injured. A 350 

foot high microwave tower and power lines were 
blown down, and extensive damage was done in the 

town of Milton. Within several hours, members of 

the 161st Transportation Battalion in Pensacola and 

Headquarters Detachments of the 1043d and 1044th 

Transportation Companies, and the 314th Ordnance 

Company were helping in the search for victims, 

patrolling to prevent looting and helping residents 

evacuate damaged homes. 

On March 6th, an unprecedented widespread 

storm struck the Middle Atlantic Coast. New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina were hit by high winds, waves, and tides. More 

than 2,000 Guardsmen from these States fought nature's fury to aid the victims of the storm. Boardwalks, concrete seawalls and other debris were hurled 

into beachfront homes, hotels, motels, and business 

establishments. Houses disappeared. Beach and 

ocean bottom were changed. With the first warnings 

of the coming storm, the States alerted their National 

Guard units, and plans of action were made. Up 

and down the stricken coast, Guardsmen were on 

active State duty evacuating the homeless and 

stranded, bringing in food, medicine, blankets, and 

drinking water, setting up road blocks to turn back 

sightseers, and guarding property. In New Jersey, 

1st Lt. David W. Bicknell drove an M37 self-propelled 105mm howitzer carriage into a burning 

railroad station to rescue exhausted firemen from 

waist-high, swirling waters. In Delaware, over 1,000 

Guardsmen drove over roads five to six feet deep 

in water to reach the stricken area and worked on 

around-the-clock duty for a week. Using boats— 

hired by the Guard and manned by the Guard— 

and vehicles, they rescued stranded persons, and 

even used boats to foil people who were trying to 

evade the road-blocks by using boats. Capt. James 

Sulpizi was awarded the State's Conspicuous Service 

Cross for making 10 trips in his wind-tossed helicopter to rescue six Coast Guardsmen from their 

Indian River Inlet station and three National Guardsmen and a Coast Guardsman who were clinging to 

a truck in deep water. Lt. Col. Philip Short, owner 

of a hundred or more properties, which were destroyed or badly damaged in the vicinity of Bethany 

Beach, stayed with his outfit, and not until days 

later did he get a chance to inspect his own property. At Ocean City, Md., the storm created havoc 

and the major tasks were to evacuate residents, guard 

against looting, and keep visitors out of the area. In 

Virginia, greatest damage was suffered on Chincoteague Island where Guardsmen assisted in a mass 

evacuation for health reasons and left a patrol to 

guard property. And in North Carolina, the Outer 

Banks were hardest hit and again the State's Guard 

rescued residents, guarded property and controlled 

traffic. Once again the National Guard received the 

highest praise from State and local officials as it 

served in its traditional State missions of mercy and 

preservation of law and order. 

36 
ACTIV E ARM Y AN D AIR FORCE SUPPOR T 

DURING THE YEARS since the end of the 

Korean War, the National Guard has enjoyed a 

closer working relationship with the active Army 

and Air Force than at any other time in the Guard's 

history. This has been especially true in FY 1962 

during the Berlin Mobilization. The sustained support given by the active components has been a 

major factor in making the Guard into an integral 

part of our Nation's defense team and in bringing 

its units to an unprecedented level of readiness. 

Army National Guard 

The essence of the "One Army" concept was 

succinctly expressed by General Maxwell D. Taylor, 

special military adviser to the President, who, while 

serving as Army Chief of Staff, said: "The Army 

National Guard, the Army Reserve, and the active 

Army make up a single integrated Army with a 

single task to perforfn." 

In the area of direct support, the active Army 

contributes both manpower and equipment throughout the year to the Guard. Army recruiters help to 

fill our manpower requirements when assistance is 

requested by the States. Approximately 2,300 active 

Army personnel are assigned year-round to advisor 

duties with our units, and training evaluators are 

assigned to every unit during annual field training. 

All Army Guard units receive General Inspections 

annually by Army Area representatives. Thousands 

of Guardsmen attend active Army service schools 

each year and many thousands more take extension 

courses conducted by these schools. Lesson plans 

and examinations for our State-operated officer 

candidate schools are prepared by the U.S. Army 

Infantry School at Fort Benning, Georgia. The 

Army supplies the Army Guard with all of its ammunition requirements, and provides heavy equipment from its inventory without reimbursement, 

augmenting it with additional equipment during annual field training. 

Not all support, however, can be measured in 

terms of man-hours and equipment. In recent 

years, the policy of both the Army and Air Force 

has been to assign the Guard vital roles in the dayto-day missions of the active establishment, thereby 

further integrating the Guard into the defense team 

and providing most realistic training. Selected units 

of the Army National Guard have been earmarked 

for earliest deployment with the Army's Strategic 

Army Force. Guard NIKE units are filling an active 

role 'round-the-clock in the active air defenses of the 

Nation. Army Guard aircraft maintenance units, 

moreover, are supporting flying elements of the U. S. 

Army Reserve. 

Air National Guard 

The ANG has an integral relationship with the 

active Air Force. General Curtis E. LeMay, Chief 

of Staff, United States Air Force, stated: "We have 

at the present time the strongest, best equipped, 

and best trained Reserve and National Guard units 

that we have ever had in our history." To accomplish and maintain this standing, the Air Force has 

been providing the Air Guard with advisers, recruiting support, school facilities, and modern equipment, 

including such late-model aircraft as the F-100, 

F-102 and F-104. Like the Army Guard, the Air 

Guard participates in a number of the missions of 

the active establishment. Photographic missions were 

performed by the Air Guard in conjunction with the 

active Air Force. Units also participated in "Swift 

Strike", a joint Army, USAF, TAC and ANG simulated theater war and close air to ground support 

mission. Air National Guard C-97 and C-l 19 units 

also provided airlift support for: 

• Transporting MATS training equipment as 

part of ANG scheduled training mission flights. 

• Transportation of Tactical Air Command 

personnel on classified missions. 

• Transportation of critical cargo for the Army 

Chemical Corps on a short notice basis, including 

test animals and birds requiring temperature and 

pressure controlled environment and special care 

while in transit. 

In support of the RS-70 Ad Hoc Committee and 

at the request of Hq USAF the Air National Guard 

provided high altitude aerial photography of areas 

damaged by fire in Arizona and California. RB-57 

aircraft from the 192nd Tactical Reconnaissance 

Squadron, Reno, Nev.. provided this photo coverage 

during April 1962. Again in May 1962 the RS-70 

Ad Hoc Committee requested photo coverage of the 

Yucca Lake AEC Control area. Specific controlled 

targets were required. The aerial photo coverage 

was provided with RB-57 aircraft of the 192nd 

Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron at Reno and 

RF-84F aircraft from the 107th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron, Romulus, Mich. The negatives 

and prints were airlifted to the Ad Hoc Committee 

in the Pentagon by RB-57 aircraft from the 192nd 

Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron, Reno. 
^/k life 

"So Long...Keep Your Powder Dry." 

FOREWOR D 

38 

SIGNIFICANT PROOF of the power and stature of the Army National Guard was 

again brought to the forefront of the Nation and the World during fiscal year 1962. On 

25 July 1961, President John F. Kennedy requested Congressional authority to mobilize the 

Reserve Components to augment active military forces to meet the Berlin crisis. During 

September and October, 44,400 Army National Guardsmen left their families, homes, and 

civilian occupations to meet that crisis. 

At the highest state of readiness in peacetime history, the Army National Guard provided 447 units, including the 32d Infantry and 49th Armored Divisions, from 39 States 

and the District of Columbia, to augment the active Army. This swift, decisive build-up 

of American forces moved German Chancellor Adenauer to the opinion that this was the 

prime factor influencing Khrushchev in his slowdown on the Berlin crisis. 

The effectiveness of day-to-day training of the Army National Guard, made possible by 

cooperative efforts of the State Adjutants General and the active Army, produced the most 

efficient mobilization in the Nation's history. The results of these efforts have been attested 

to by public statements of civic, military, and political leaders throughout the free world. The 

following statement on the recall made by then-Secretary of the Army, Elvis J. Stahr, jr., 

expresses the thoughts of most public figures: 

I have observed with deep pride and satisfaction the efficient manner in which 

reserve component units have been brought into the active Army during the current 

expansion. 

The orderly execution of this difficult operation is attributable to outstanding 

teamwork among the Army National Guard, the Army Reserve, the Adjutants General of the several States, and the active Army. It clearly reflects the quality of Army 

mobilization planning, the fundamental soundness of our reserve structure, and firm 

and far-sighted military leadership at all levels. 

I want to say, further, that I have sincerest admiration for the spirit in which 

the officers and men of units summoned to service have responded to the call of duty. 

Their sense of purpose and selfless dedication to mission establish high standards for 

the Nation as a whole in these critical times. 

Maj. Gen. D. W. McGowan, Chief, National Guard Bureau, in written testimony for 

a Senate Sub-Committee stated: "We could have called up any two from a dozen National 

Guard Divisions which would have earned the same praise." 

The Army National Guard was ready in fiscal year 1962. The factors producing that 

readiness are set forth in this report. 
COMPTROLLE R FUNCTION S 

THE CONGRESS appropriated $427,869,000 

for the support of the Army National Guard during 

FY 1962. These funds were included in three appropriations, covering military personnel, operating 

costs (including technician pay), and the construction of armory and non-armory facilities. 

Appropriations 

Appropriation Total 

Appropriated Rtimburtomont Availabl e 

ARNG Personnel $235,000,00 0 $1,100,00 0 $236,100,00 0 

ARNG Operation 

and Maintenance 171,000,00 0 500,00 0 171,500,00 0 

ARNG Military 

Construction 21,869,00 0 *See Summary 

Statement, ARNG 

Military Construction 

These funds supported an average strength of 

400,000 with an input of 66,000 Army National 

Guard trainees into the six months active duty program. Due to the mobilization of 44,371 Guardsmen in the Fall of 1961, and suspension of the six 

month program during the period September through 

December, these funds could not be fully utilized, 

and $21.9-million ($16.4 million, ARNG Personnel; 

and $5.5-million, ARNG Operation and Maintenance) were transferred to other appropriations for 

support of active Army requirements. Additionally, 

$4.5-million was retained in budgetary reserves. 

•Summary Statement, ARNG Military Construction (No Year Appropriation) 

Funds available from FY 1961 $11,416,00 0 

FY 196 2 Appropriation 21,869,00 0 

Total avoiloble in FY 1 96 2 33,285,00 0 

FY 196 2 obligations 1 6,883,000 

Funds remaining available for FY 1 96 3 I 6,402,00 0 

Funding 

Funding for National Guard Personnel, Army, 

(NGP,A) during the fiscal year totaled $215.2-

million. The initial apportionment of $121.8-million was issued to meet first half requirements 

only, and included funding of $2.5 million for additional multiple drills authorized ARNG units of 

the four-division force structure alerted for mobilization. The second half FY 1962 apportionment of 

$93.4-million provided for a continuation of accelerated training of the two-division force not mobilized. 

ARNG Operations and Maintenance (O&M) 

apportionments during the fiscal year totalled $166-

million. The initial apportionment of $88.7-million 

was issued to meet first half requirements only. The 

second half apportionment of $77.3-million included 

$1.2-million for support of State Technician Retirement Contributions, an item not provided for in the 

appropriation. 

Obligations 

ARNG Personnel $209,009,80 8 

ARNG O& M 1 64,478,52 3 

ARNG Military Construction 1 6,883,37 5 

State funding programs were 98.8 percent obligated, 

as compared with 99.3 percent in FY 196 0 and FY 

1961 . A table showing appropriated funds obligated 

by State or Department of the Army agencies during 

FY 196 2 is attached at Appendix H. 

Finance Service 

Travel allowances for ARNG technicians were 

revised to authorize a per diem rate of up to $16 

per day. The increase was designed to keep ARNG 

technician entitlement as nearly as possible in line 

with authorized rates for Department of the Army 

civilian employees. Regulations governing travel 

allowances for ARNG technicians have been transferred from NGR 51 to NGR 52, dated 2 July 1962. 

Audit and Reports of Survey 

The Army Audit Agency audited approximately 

40 percent of the U.S. Property and Fiscal Officers' 

(USP&FO) Federal fund and property accounts in 

the States. The findings and recommendations were 

reported in detail to State authorities, the National 
Guard Bureau, and the Department of the Army. 

The States evaluated these reports and initiated 

needed action to improve internal procedures. The 

National Guard Bureau's review and analysis of 

findings and recommendations was also used as the 

basis for improving various accounting, reporting, 

and management procedures. 

Action was taken by the Bureau to improve 

procedures for processing appeals from pecuniary 

liability on Reports of Survey (DD Form 200). The 

requests for appeal of charges on ARNG Reports 

of Survey were reviewed by the Bureau and recommendations for relief, when warranted, were made 

prior to forwarding Reports to the Secretary of the 

Army for final action. 

Project MAC—Cost and Performance 

Reporting System 

The development of a cost and performance 

reporting system to be tested in several States during 

fiscal year 1963 was completed. This system, if 

proven successful, will provide the Army National 

Guard with a management and fiscal structure useful 

for programming, budgeting, fiscal accounting, and 

other managerial uses. 

The one program concept presently used in the 

ARNG personnel appropriation has been applied to 

the Operations and Maintenance appropriation. The 

project accounts are designed to follow organizational 

lines and permit a normal relationship of costs to 

performance. 

By addition of detail accounts, a management 

account structure is created. These accounts are 

subsidiary to the fiscal structure and provide the 

means for reporting performance and related costs. 

This technique will result in more effective programming and improved fund control. 

Complete implementation of the Cost and Performance Reporting System is planned for fiscal year 

1964. 

Technicians 

The backbone of the Army National Guard is 

the full-time employee referred to professionally as 

"Technician." 

These dedicated citizen-soldiers are employees 

of their respective States, but are paid by the Federal government. Their wages are established under 

the two basic Federal pay systems, half subject to 

Classification Act schedules and the other half to 

Army-Air Force Wage Board schedules. 

Technician duties are performed in four major 

categories: 1) Organization positions—including 

staff, training, administrative, operational, supply, 

and maintenance duties within combat and service 

units—which directly assist the commander in discharging his duties and responsibilities, 2) USP&FO 

positions, including budgeting, accounting, supply, 

clerical and warehousing duties, 3) Field Maintenance positions, including administrative, technical, 

craft and trade duties for Combined Field Maintenance Shops, Army Aviation Maintenance Shops, and 

Field Training Equipment Concentration Sites, and 

4) Air Defense positions, providing a full-time 

cadre of command, operations, and maintenance personnel necessary to permit missile units to participate 

full-time with units of the active Army in U.S. air 

defense. 

Benefits provided to technicians include Old 

Age & Survivors Insurance under the Social Security 

Act, Employees' Compensation under the Federal 

Employee's Compensation Act for injuries or death 

sustained while in the performance of their official 

duties as technicians, and Unemployment Compensation under the Social Security Act. 

A more recently acquired benefit emerged from 

a Congressional act (PL 87-224) which provides for 

Federal contribution to the States for the employer's 

share of State retirement in those States where a 

retirement system exists to which technicians are 

accepted under mutual Federal and State agreement. 

Nine states qualified during the year effective 13 September 1961, the date of the Act. These States are 

Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, and Ohio. NGB 

funded the nine states $776,300 to cover FY 1962 

cost of the employer's contribution. These funds 

were allotted on a basis not to exceed 6.5 percent of 

the individual employee's compensation, less the 

employer's contribution to FICA. 

FY 1962 reflected many improvements in the 

Army National Guard Technician Program. 

The year began with 22,046 positions allotted 

to the States. This included 4,330 in the Air Defense Program. The year closed with 20,991 supported positions, which included 4,396 in Air Defense. Some 1,767 technicians were mobilized with 

their units. 

Pay increases from new Wage Board schedules 

developed during the year amounted to $1,262,600. 

These increases, in addition to step-in-grade raises 

paid to both Wage Board and Classification Act 

technicians, caused the nationwide average techni-
cian cost to rise from $5,867 in FY 1961 to $6,024 

in FY 1962. Obligations to support the program 

amounted to $123.8 million, including $25.5 million for Air Defense technicians. 

Of special significance was the establishment 

of three Transportation Aircraft Repair Battalion 

Shops in August 1961. These facilities are located 

in California, Missouri, and Connecticut, with an 

authorized technician manning of 50 each. These 

technicians perform depot level maintenance—4th 

and 5th echelon—on active Army aircraft as well 

as on Reserve Component aircraft. 

Quarterly Review and Analysis 

Continuing review and analysis of the Army 

National Guard program indicates that in most areas 

actual performance was close to programmed objectives. 

Quarterly reports to the Vice Chief of Staff 

on execution of the ARNG program served to highlight significant deficiencies, excesses, and problem 

areas requiring action by higher authority. 

Attention focused on the shortage of Army Advisors resulted in Department of Army action which 

should aid considerably in equitable distribution of 

Advisors to all States. Improvement was noted in 

the final quarter of FY 1962. 

PERSONNEL 

Military Strength 

The federally recognized strength of the Army 

National Guard on 30 June 1961 was 393,807. 

On 30 June 1962, the strength of the Army National Guard was 405,341, including 44,371 personnel who were members of units mobilized in 

September and October of 1961 in connection with 

the Berlin Crisis. 

The following significant factors affected 

strength performance in FY 1962: 

• From 1 September 1961 through 31 December 1961, Department of the Army policy prohibited procurement of non-prior service personnel who had attained age 20. This policy 

was revised on 21 November 1961 to permit procurement of personnel who had not attained their 

22d birthday on date of enlistment. 

Inclusion of additional State statistics in the 

quarterly ARNG progress report stimulated competitive interest in the States, particularly in attendance at armory drill and annual field training. 

Reports Control 

Continuing review of recurring reports succeeded in eliminating five reports previously required. 

Recurring reports required of the several states by 

NGB have now been reduced to 19. 

Remaining reports are being subjected to a 

critical evaluation as a result of increased appreciation by NGB of the purposes and uses of reports. 

Emphasis is being placed on such considerations as 

cost, hours of preparation time required and sources 

of data involved. This Bureau program has been 

coordinated and is being implemented concurrently 

with the Army-wide reporting requirements initiated 

by the Army "Autoprobe" Committee in FY 1962. 

Ultimately, reports required by Department of the 

Army will be improved and consolidated into an 

automated Army information data bank. Proper 

use of this available data should permit the Army to 

answer questions immediately without resorting to 

special report requirements. 

• The enlistments and ready reserve obligations 

of personnel expiring between 1 October 1961 

and 30 June 1962 were extended for one year 

in connection with the Berlin Crisis. 

• Losses among personnel who were members 

of units in a State status were 25% less than anticipated. 

Army National Guard Strength 

30 June 60 30 June 61 30 June 61 

Totol 401,74 5 393,80 7 *405,34 1 

Officers and warrant officer! 37,14 2 36,24 5 *35,34 7 

Enliited penonnel 364,62 3 357,56 2 *369,99 4 

•Include! 3,889 Officii and 40,482 EM who were member! of unit! mobilized 

in Sept. and October 1961. 
15 

STATE STRENGTHS 

(% OF PRIORITY AGGREGATE) 

30 JUNE 1962 

10 

5 

OVER PRIORITY AGGREGATE 

P.R. 

MINN 

PA 

IND 

IDA 

ILL 

N.J. 

OKLA 

698 

570 

880 

388 

118 

378 

460 

230 

MICH 

s.c. 

FLA 

IOWA 

N.Y. 

DEL 

N.C. 

wise 

MASS 

222 

190 

136 

133 

431 

40 

126 

99 

381 

5480 

THIS CHART SHOWS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD STRENGTH BY 

STATE. THE PRIORITY AGGREGATE STRENGTH IS INDICATED 
UNDER PRIORITY AGGREGATE 

ARK 

KAN 

MISS 

TENN 

CALIF 

UTAH 

MD 

OHIO 

ALA 

NEBR 

CONN 

4 

20 

44 

46 

103 

32 

69 

195 

206 

63 

108 

W.VA 

COLO 

VA 

KY 

N.MEX 

HAW 

VT 

D.C. 

TEX 

ORE 

MO 

GA 

82 

73 

251 

146 

93 

120 

107 

87 

944 

314 

415 

558 

MONT 

ARIZ 

ME 

R. 1 . 

N.D. 

WYO 

ALAS 

LA 

WASH 

S.D. 

N.H. 

NEV 

143 

164 

168 

183 

184 

1 14 

155 

684 

594 

426 

289 

105 

7289 

15 

BY THE '0' LINE AND THE ACTUAL 30 JUNE 1962 STRENGTH (INCLUDING 

MOBILIZED STRENGTH) IS SHOWN AS A PERCENTAGE ABOVE OR BELOW THAT PRIORITY AGGREGATE. 
Procurement (Officers and Warrant Officers) 

The following is a comparison of the overall 

officer-warrant officer strength of the Army National 

Guard as of 30 June 1961 and 30 June 1962: 

Assigned Strength Assigned Strength 

30 June 1961 30 June 1962 

Officers 31,82 7 27,511 

Warran t Officers 4,41 8 3,94 7 

TOTA L 36,24 5 31,45 8 

The major portion of the decrease in overall 

officer-warrant officer strength during FY 1962 was 

brought about by the loss of 3420 officers and 469 

warrant officers who entered on active duty with 

their unit on 1 and 15 October 1961. 

Graduates from accredited officer candidate 

schools continue to be the primary source of procurement of second lieutenants. 

A comparison of FY 1961 and FY 1962 procurement of second lieutenants, by major source, 

is shown below: 

FY 1961 FY 1962 

Officer Candidate Schools 1 64 8 207 5 

Regular (1 3) |5 | 

Special (3761 (361 I 

State (1259 ) (17091 

ROTC (USAR) Gra d 44 1 21 8 

Former Officers an d Others 1 23 82 

All Other Sources 22 6 

TOTA L 223 4 238 1 

Personnel Actions 

The following table reflects officer and warrant 

officer personnel actions taken during FY 1961 and 

FY 1962. The decrease in the number of personnel 

actions in each category is believed to be largely 

due to the mobilization of ARNG units during the 

Berlin build-up. 

FY 1961 FY 1962 

Federal Recognitions 13,12 5 12,62 5 

Reossignments 1 2,698 1 1 ,481 

Transfers to Inactive N G 1,638 85 5 

Separations 6,732 5,743 

Reserve Officer Personnel Act 

During FY 1962 Federal recognition of 68 

ARNG officers was withdrawn under years of service 

and time-in-grade provisions of the Reserve Officers 

Personnel Act (ROPA). Although the number is 

99 less than for FY 1961, projections show a steady 

increase each year for the next five fiscal years. 

During the first half of FY 1962 all eligible 

Army National Guard officers had received initial 

consideration for promotion under the mandatory 

*. * 

m m 

A * 

44 

A Stale OCS Cla 
consideration provisions of ROPA. A final computation reveals the following rate of selection: 1st Lts, 

44%; Captains, 34%; Majors, 59%, for an average 

of 44% for all grades. As projected in the FY 1961 

annual report, the low rate of selection was obviously 

due to failure of officers concerned to meet prescribed military educational requirements. Incomplete 

reports from 29 States reveal a substantial increase 

in the number selected for promotion by boards 

meeting in the last half of FY 1962. The rate of 

selection at the close of FY 1962 was as follows: 1st 

Lt, 63%; Captain, 527c; Major, 64%. Of 3134 

ARNG officers advised of selection for promotion 

during FY 1962, 23% accepted promotion in the 

ARNG; 62% declined promotion, and 15% resigned 

to accept promotion in the U. S. Army Reserve 

(USAR). Lack of appropriate unit position vacancies in the higher grade is the reason for the large 

percentage of declinations and resignations. It is 

anticipated that the continued lack of appropriate 

ARNG unit vacancies will require many of those 

officers who declined promotion to resign during FY 

1964 in order to accept promotion in the USAR. 

Warrant Officer Conversion Program 

On 1 June 1962 the new warrant officer career 

program announced in DA Circular 135-1, 30 

March 1962, was implemented in the Army National 

Guard. Some 545 ARNG warrant officer positions 

were converted to commissioned officer. Provisions 

exist whereby such warrant officers, if ineligible for 

a commission, may be retained in lieu of the commissioned officer until they complete 20 years of 

creditable service to qualify for retirement at age 

60, or until 31 December 1967, whichever is the 

earlier date. Due to the recent effective date of the 

program implementation, no experience factors are 

available on how many of the 545 warrant officers 

will qualify for a commission or retention in lieu 

of a commissioned officer. 

Procurement (Enlisted Personnel) 

FISCAL YEAR 1962 ENLISTED GAINS AND LOSSES 

GAINS: 

Enlisted in 62 to take 6 in 62 39,800 

Enlisted in 62 to take 6 in 63 8,000 

Veterans 4,200 

Reserve Forces Act Obligors 3,800 

Transferred from Inactive National Guard 4,500 

Enlist from other Reserve Components 6,900 

Other 1,900 

TOTAL GAINS 69,100 

LOSSES *97,100 

•Includes 40,482 EM who entered on active duty as members of mobilized 

units. 

RFA—55 Training Program 

During FY 1962, 48,705 Army National 

Guardsmen entered the training program even 

though inputs were suspended from 1 September 

1961 until 1 January 1962. Since the program's 

inception in FY 1956, 319,608 Army National 

Guardsmen have enlisted or volunteered to "take 

6", 294,341 have actually entered training and 240,-

546 have completed training and returned to their 

units. On 30 June 1962, there were 37,087 Army 

National Guard enlisted men training in the six 

month program. 45 
Calisthenics at six month active duty training. 

Personnel Actions 

In FY 1962—1.2% of completed State enlistment applications were rejected by the Bureau as 

compared to 1% in FY 1961. This low rejection 

rate indicates the continued careful screening of applications by recruiting personnel, unit commanders, 

and other State authorities. 

PAY GRADES E-8 AND E-9 

In lieu of quotas periodically announced by 

Chief, NGB, the States were authorized on 8 November 1961 (NGR 25-6) to promote personnel on a 

"fully and best qualified" basis to grades E-8 and 

E-9 based on TOE as modified by Organization 

Guides and as established by Table of Organization 

for State Headquarters and Headquarters Detachments. 

A program for accelerated promotion to these 

grades was also implemented. State Adjutants General were authorized (within quotas announced by 

the Chief, National Guard Bureau) to promote outstanding personnel who met all service requirements 

except *total years of service. In this connection, 

the minimum service requirements for promotion to 

these grades are as follows: 

46 

For Promotion 

Pay Grade 

E-9 

E-8 

Time in Pay 

Grade 

28 Months in E-8 

24 Months in E-7 

Cumulative 

ENL Service 

10 

8 

•Total Years 

of Service 

18 

15 

Army National Guard Register 

During FY 1962 the Military Service Branch, 

Army Personnel Division, NGB processed the following actions: 

• 4,345 statements of service (NGB Forms 

03D) for publication in the Army National Guard 

Register. 

• 6,730 promotions for entry in the Register. 

• 15,170 other actions affecting the Register, 

such as changes in branch, designations as Army 

Aviator, completion of courses of instruction at 

Army Service Schools, transfer to and from the 

Inactive National Guard, and terminations of 

Federal recognition requiring the deletion of a 

statement of service from the Register. 

• 5,028 pieces of correspondence, involving requests for change in Register entries, statements 

of service for retirement purposes, etc. Included 

in this figure are 1,592 form letters transmitting 

to State Adjutants General 2,992 "Requests for 

National Guard Service." These requests, initiated 

by various branches of The Adjutant General's 

Office, Dept. of the Army, are sent to the National Guard Bureau for transmittal to the appropriate State Adjutant General. 

The 1962 edition of the Official Army National Guard Register was distributed to the States 

during the latter part of May 1962, at an estimated 

cost of $6,355. This edition contains names and 

statements of service of approximately 38,700 officers 

and warrant officers of the active and Inactive Army 

National Guard. 
MEDICAL ACTIVITIES 

Reponsibilities 

One of the most important duties and responsibilities of the Army Surgeon's office is to provide 

realistic medical fitness criteria for procurement and 

retention of members of the Army National Guard. 

The provisions of AR 40-501, "Standards of Medical 

Fitness," are applied in conjunction with other applicable regulations and policies to insure that all members of the Army National Guard possess the physical 

capability required to be productive in the military 

establishment. Constant surveillance of medical fitness is reflected in the number of reports of medical 

examination of ARNG officers reviewed during FY 

1962 as shown below: 

PURPOSE OF EXAMINATION NUMBER 

Initial Federal Recognition, promotion, etc.. . . 10,798 

Army aviation 371 

Periodic medical exams 5,280 

Statements in lieu of medical exams 14,637 

Medical exams for school attendance 1,201 

TOTAL 32,287 

Of this figure, 164 were found to be medically 

unacceptable for the purpose evaluated. 

In addition to the number of officer cases processed, 3,747 questionable enlisted medical examinations were reviewed, of which 895 were found to be 

medically unacceptable for enlistment or retention. 

Another duty and responsibility of equal significance is the review and evaluation of both formal 

and informal line-of-duty investigations relating to 

disease or injury of ARNG personnel occurring during a duty status and the supervision of medical care 

resulting therefrom. During FY 1962 the Army 

Surgeon's office reviewed and processed 1,975 formal and 2,110 informal line-of-duty investigations. 

In connection with these investigations and the administration of medical care, there were 1,815 pieces 

of outgoing correspondence from the Surgeon's office. 

Personnel 

The number of medical personnel in the Army 

National Guard at the end of FY 1962 was still below 

the authorized strength. The following table compares strengths for the past three years: 

ACTUAL STRENGTH 

30 30 30 Jun 62 AUTHORJun 60 Jun 61 S((1( e Mobilized IZED 

Status Status STRENGTH 

IN UNITS 

Medical Corps ... . 847 941 791 160 1,431 

Dental Corps 204 206 173 U 186 

Nurses Corps 56 44 32 17 240 

Medical Services 

Corps 880 837 650 187 779 

TOTAL 1,987 2,028 1,646 379 2,636 

The number of Federally recognized medical 

units, by type, in the ARNG at the end of FY 1962 

is listed below: 

Medical Companies (organic) 

Medical Battalions, Hq & Hq Detachments 

(organic) 

Medical Companies (separate) 

Medical Battalions, Hq & Hq Detachments 

(separate) 

Evacuation Hospitals 

Mobile Army Surgical Hospitals 

Dental Detachments |KJ) 

Medical Detachments (OA) 

27 

19 

TOTAL 

The following numbers of ARNG personnel 

were medically disqualified for partial mobilization 

in October 1961, during the Berlin crisis: 

Officers 

Warrant Officers 

Enlisted Men 41,410 

STRENGTH 

3,258 

450 

41,410 

MEDICAL 

DISQUALIFICATIONS 

25 

3 

293 

PERCENT 

0.8 

0.7 

0.7 

TOTAL 45,118 

The National Guard Bureau was allocated 

$374,000 by the Army Surgeon General to provide 

physical examinations and medical care for ARNG 

personnel during FY 1962. Of this total, $349,-

430.01 was obligated by the States. 47 
ORGANIZATIO N AN D TRAININ G 

Troop Unit Organization 

The Army National Guard, as of 30 June 1962, 

consisted of 4,313 federally recognized units of company or detachment size; 446 of these units served 

on active duty for 9 months of this fiscal year. On 

the accompanying chart the troop basis is separated 

into Infantry, Armor, Artillery and other. 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ORGANIZATION 

400,000 STRENGTH 4400 UNITS 

Special Forces 

48 

The 4,313 federally recognized units represented 

a decrease of 54 units from the 30 June 1961 total 

of 4,367. 

During the fiscal year, reorganization actions 

were continued to further align the ARNG troop 

basis with revised mobilization requirements. Most 

notable among these actions was the complete elimination of all 75-mm and 90-mm Air Defense Artillery 

Battalions from the troop basis by their conversion to 

Armor. Field Artillery, Engineer and Automatic 

Weapons Self-propelled Battalions. As a part of 

these reorganization actions a new Special Forces 

Company was organized in the State of Rhode Island. 

In June 1962 the move from the NIKE-AJAX to the 

more modern and efficient NIKE-HERCULES was 

begun with the activation of NIKE-HERCULES 

units in Missouri and Texas. 

As U. S. military forces devoted increasing 

emphasis to counterinsurgency warfare in FY 1962, 

working, in fact, in active support of the South Vietnamese in their war against Communist guerrillas. 

the capabilities of Army National Guard Special 

Forces took on added significance. 

ARNG Special Forces stepped up their operational readiness by sending additional personnel to 

active Army courses for advanced training and by 

working on their own and with Army Special Forces 

on field training exercises throughout the year. 

At the beginning of FY 1962, Special Forces 

organizations were in being in five States: Alabama, 

Louisiana, North Carolina, Utah and West Virginia. 

By the end of the year, a sixth State—Rhode Island— 

had been authorized to organize a Special Forces 

company, and plans were underway for a subs'antial 

increase in the Guard's Special Forces 1200-man 

strength in FY 1963. 

Special Forces are characterized by versatility 

in the arts of unconventional military combat, combined with techniques of infiltration by land, sea or 

air to establish liaison with indigenous partisan forces 

and provide military leadership to those forces. 

Recruiting standards are exceptionally high 

because of the hazardous duties and special skills 

required. In addition to being highly qualified in 

basic arms, ARNG Special Forces personnel are 
trained in parachuting, demolition, medical aid, and 

communications. Organized into small detachments 

of not more than a dozen members, they engage in 

constant cross-training so that any man can fill in 

for any other in the detachment. They are also 

trained in foreign languages so that they can intermingle freely with native forces. 

Following are reports of ARNG Special Forces 

activities in the five States with operational units in 

FY 1962: 

ALABAMA 

The 20th Special Forces Group of Alabama 

is composed of three companies: Headquarters and 

Headquarters Co., Birmingham; Company A, Montgomery; and Company B, Florence. Total strength 

of the Group is 221. 

Nearly 80% of assigned personnel are jump 

qualified, many of them jumpmaster qualified. 

The Group attends two 3-hour night drills and 

one weekend training exercise each month. For two 

months each quarter, weekend training exercises are 

conducted on a 96,000-acre tract of land near Montgomery, ideally suited for Special Forces training 

and operations. The third weekend each quarter is 

devoted to parachute jumps. 

A special weekend training exercise was scheduled during the year at Fort Benning, Ga., for practical work in demolition. In addition, Company B 

conducted survival and water training in the Huntsville area. 

The Group conducted its annual field training 

in the mountains of Utah in a combined exercise 

with the Utah Special Forces. Projected plans for 

FY 1963 include swamp training in Florida. 

In individual training, 70% of all personnel 

assigned to the Group have attended the appropriate 

service schools for their MOS qualifications; 20% 

have completed the Special Forces Warfare Course 

(resident and non-resident), and 70% of the remainder are enrolled in these schools. 

LOUISIANA 

Louisiana's 21st Special Forces Group, with 

Headquarters Company and Companies A and B, 

has now entered its fourth year of training. Results 

of previous years have been carefully studied and 

hopes are higher this year than ever before of attaining the maximum in programmed training. 

Annual Field Training of 1962 was conducted 

in the hills surrounding Braggs, Oklahoma (Camp 

Gruber, Oklahoma) and was by far the most effective and realistic to Special Forces operations. This 

encampment was held in conjunction with the 9th 

Special Forces Group, a Reserve Unit, and was 

spent entirely in the field. 

For the past three years the Special Forces have 

been conducting quarterly jumps at three home 

station locations. All jumps were made part of a 

weekend field exercise in which, depending on the 

weather, two jumps per individual were conducted. 

At first L-20 type army aircraft was used; however 

the last jump at home station was made from C-l 19 

aircraft of the 706th Troop Carrier Squadron, 

USAFR. Arrangements have been made for continuation of this support for the balance of this 

calendar year. 

Qualified airborne personnel are scheduled to 

attend the Jump Master Course conducted at Fort 

Bragg, N. C. or Fort Campbell, Ky. 

A Special Forces team working 

with local "guerrilla leader." 
NORTH CAROLINA 

On 4 October 1961, Wilmington's Company C 

of the 16th Special Forces Group was reorganized 

and three of its operational detachments were transferred to Charlotte. Company C now has an authorized strength of 18 officers and 40 men at Wilmington and ten officers and 22 men at Charlotte. 

In June 1962, the units moved from their respective cities to Fort Bragg for 15 days of annual 

field training, to work directly with the Army's 5th 

Special Forces Group. 

During the first week, Company C continued 

its advanced military occupational specialty (MOS) 

training, conducting the majoirty of instruction with 

assigned personnel. 

During the middle weekend of training, Company C was divided into three operational teams and 

one control team to conduct a field problem. A 

total of 31 officers and enlisted men participated in 

the initial parachute drop. 

Each team was dropped separately into a field 

in the Uwharrie National Forest Area and began its 

field problem against aggressors. Each team performed surveillance, movement, raids, etc., according to Special Forces methods. All messages were 

transmitted by Morse Code, requiring the radio 

specialist to apply the techniques learned. This same 

basic principle was applied to each team member 

and his team job. 

UTAH 

The 19th Special Forces Group, 1st Special 

Forces, Utah Army National Guard, consists of 

Headquarters Company and Companies A, B, C and 

D. Training of the Group during FY 1962 was 

characterized by weekend assemblies conducted in 

the rugged mountains of Utah, and in MOS training 

for all individuals assigned. 

During the year, the 19th Special Forces Group 

was featured in a half-hour television show over the 

Department of the Army's "Big Picture" series. 

This show, entitled "The Silent Warriors" brought 

to millions of Americans the vital role of our Special 

Forces and the role played in this area by dedicated 

citizen-soldiers of the Guard. 

Annual field training for the majority of the 

Group in FY 1962 was conducted at Camp Williams, 

Utah. In addition, however, 25 officers and 75 enlisted men traveled to the U. S. Naval Amphibious 

Base, San Diego, Calif., for specialized training in 

50 amphibious techniques and underwater reconnaissance and demolition. At the completion of this 

training the group returned by C-119 aircraft and 

accomplished a parachute drop at Camp Williams. 

The 16th Special Forces Group (Airborne), 

of West Virginia, is a highly respected unit with outstanding young officers and dedicated enlisted personnel. Since its organization in 1959, the group 

has challenged the imagination of the four communities in which its five units are stationed, and 

community support is widespread. 

During annual field training in 1962, the Group 

successfully staged "OPERATION DARE," a 13-

day tactical Special Forces operation in Preston 

County, West Virginia, during which six 10-man 

Operational Detachments were adjudged "highly 

effective" by a US Army Special Forces evaluation 

board. 

Since early March 1962, the 7th Special Forces 

Group (Airborne). USA, Fort Bragg, N. C, has 

operated a Maneuver Field Control Headquarters 

at Camp Dawson, the state's only military reservation, commanded by the CO, 16th Special Forces 

Group. The association between the two groups has 

extended over a four year period in training, and 

has proven valuable, particularly to the 16th. 

Week-end training assemblies are held six times 

annually by the Group. Committee-type training 

in basic subjects, i.e., medical, communications, and 

demolitions, is undertaken to further qualify members of Operational Detachments during these 
periods. This training is combined with field training exercises, including parachute drops, resupply, 

etc. 

The Group has also been associated with the 

17-day tactical operation participated in by Great 

Britain's 22d Special Air Service Regiment (counterpart of US Army Special Forces) at Camp Dawson. 

Personnel from the Group participated as observers. 

Through group staff coordination, six Drop 

Zones have been established in West Virginia for airborne operations and approved by Second US Army 

and Continental Army Command. The Group also 

participated in a joint amphibian operation with the 

130th Troop Carrier Squadron as part of an Operational Readiness Inspection by the 9th U. S. Air 

Force. 

Air Defense Artillery 

Four years ago the Army National Guard took 

over four NIKE AJAX sites from the active Army in 

the State of California as a part of a test to determine 

if the ARNG could be used to relieve active NIKE 

forces for other military requirements. The results 

of this test were favorable and during the ensuing 

years the ARNG has assumed an increasing role in 

Army Air Defense. 

At the beginning of FY 1962, 15 states were 

participating in the Army Air Defense program, 

providing 76 NIKE AJAX batteries and six NIKE HERCULES batteries from 34 battalions in 16 key industrial and population centers in CONUS and Hawaii. 

Special Forces in action 

FY 1962 saw a number of changes in the program. Seven on-site NIKE AJAX batteries were released from the on-site mission and a NIKE HERCULES 

battalion with two batteries was activated in Missouri. 

The release of AJAX units from the tactical mission 

marked the beginning of a program to phase out the 

older NIKE AJAX missile and convert ARNG on-site 

batteries to the more modern NIKE HERCULES missile. 

As existing ARNG NIKE AJAX units are reorganized 

and retrained as HERCUI.ES units, they will replace 

active Army units on sites already in existence, 

releasing more than 5000 active Army personnel for 

other duties. The completion of this program in 

approximately 2'/i years will result in an aggregate 

increase in technician strength of more than 700 and 

will provide 19 NIKE HERCULES battalions consisting 

of 54 batteries. With entry of Missouri during FY 

1962 and Texas in FY 1963, 17 states will be participating in the Air Defense program. 

During the fiscal year NIKE AJAX technicians 

from three states began transition training in preparations for a NIKE HERCULES on-site mission during 

FY 1963. 

ARNG on-site units earned most of the 

ARADCOM Commander's Trophie s annually 

awarded to outstanding on-site units as a result of 

Mighty NIKE HERCULES stand guard in Hawaii 
Short Notice Annual Practice (SNAP) and Operational Readiness Evaluation scores during the year. 

First and second place honors were earned by 

ARNG units as outstanding missile firing batteries, 

while ARNG battalions earned first place honors in 

both the three-or-less and four-or-more on-site firing 

battery categories. The results of ARADCOM 

Operational Readiness Evaluations show a 10 percent gain over the previous year, reflecting continued 

improvement in all operational areas. 

Training Criteria 

The Army National Guard conducts training in 

accordance with criteria established by Headquarters, 

United States Continental Army Command 

(USCONARC) and United States Army Air Defense 

Command (ARADCOM). The USCONARC 

training criteria are set forth in Annex AA to its 

Training Directive, dated 21 November 1961, which 

established the following objectives for the Army 

National Guard: 

INDIVIDUALS 

• To attain and maintain proficiency of all 

personnel in fundamentals of combat operations; 

• To prepare, by progressive selection and training, officers qualified to assume command and staff 

responsibility at all echelons; 

• To develop and qualify all personnel in their 

MOS and grade assignment; 

• To develop efficient instructors; and 

• To maintain standards of mental and physical 

fitness necessary for active duty, including indoctrination of all individuals in the Code of Conduct. 

ARMY NATIONAL 

GUARD AIR 

DEFENSE 

PROGRAM 

MISSILE BATTALIONS 

ORGANIZED 

The chart shows Army National Guard individual training progress from FY 1958 through FY 

1962. As of 30 June 1962, 97% of all officers and 

enlisted men were basically trained. Of these 71% 

were prior servicemen or six month trainees. The 

vital importance of the six month training program 

to this training progress is evident. 

UNITS 

• To bring all units to such a state of readiness 

that, upon mobilization, they can receive, administer, 

and train qualified fillers and train under appropriate 

Army Training Programs (ATP) or Intensified Combat Training Programs (ICTP) as directed. 

• Priority I and II combat units (infantry, 

armor, and artillery) to train at platoon battery level 

through annual active duty training (ANACDUTRA) 

1962, and, upon successful completion, may be 

authorized by the Army Commander concerned to 

initiate company (or artillery battalion) level training. 

• Priority III combat units to train at platoon 

battery level through ANACDUTRA 1962. and to 

maintain such level of proficiency thereafter 

• Technical and administrative units to continue 

training in the basic unit phase under appropriate 

ATP or special training directive. 

ARMT NATIONAL GUARD 

INDIVIDUAL TRAINING PROGRESS 
Combat Training 

The general status of Army National Guard 

training on 31 December 1962 is depicted on the 

"Arrow" graph below. 

TRAINING FOR COMBAT 

[INFANTRY BATTLE GROUP) 

OVERSEAS DEPLOYMENT 

FIELD EXERCISES I MANEUVERS 

5 WEEKS) 

MANEUVER PREPARATION 2 WEEKS 

ADVANCED UNIT TRAINING 

[E WEEKS] 

BASIC UNII TRAINING 

;v 1 ! "WEEKS: 

ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING 

IB WEEKS) 

BASIC COMBAT TRAINING 

INDIVIDUAL 

IB WEEKS 

UNIT 

TRAINING 

30 IUNE 19( 2 

4 LEVEL 

[7 WEEKS 

INDIVIDUAL 

TRAINING 

As indicated, an Infantry Battle Group undergoes a 36-week training program in attaining readiness for overseas deployment. The training programs 

for elements require less time. 

The Army National Guard, released from conducting basic individual training in October 1958 

with implementation of mandatory 6-month active 

Army training for new recruits, has since then conducted unit training exclusively. Individuals returning from basic training are integrated into unit 

training. At the end of FY 1962 Army National 

Guard units had satisfactorily completed an average 

of 5'/2 weeks of basic unit training, or 21Vi of the 

total 36-week training program. This is one week 

better than the 1961 average unit training level. 

Armory Training 

All ARNG units participated in at least 48 paid 

assemblies during fiscal year 1962. In addition, 

some high priority ARNG units in 38 States were 

authorized to conduct an additional multiple training 

assembly each month from September 1961 to 

February 1962. As would thus be expected, the 

total number of multiple or weekend training assemblies increased 5% over FY 1961, even though 

some 447 of these units were mobilized in October 

1961. Multiple (8-hour) or weekend training assemblies accounted for 33.4% of the total. 

The number of officers, warrant officers, and 

enlisted men participating in armory training 

amounted to an average of 93.2% of assigned 

strength (excluding constructive attendance) an overall percentage increase of 1.7 over the previous fiscal 

year. This increase is indicative of the enforcement 

of minimum standards and greater effort to attain 

maximum attendance at all training assemblies. 

Percentages of attendance at armory training 

during the past two years, excluding constructive 

attendance, are shown below: 

Officers and warrant officers 

Enlisted men 

% 

Fitcal Year 

1961 

96.8 

90.9 

F 

% 

teal Year 

1962 

97.3 

92.8 

Annual Field Training 

Approximately 302,000 Guardsmen, representing about 97% of ARNG paid drill strength (assigned strength less constructive attendance), attended 15 days of annual field training during 1962. 

Training, as prescribed in appropriate Army programs, was accomplished at 113 sites owned and 

operated as shown below: 

302,000 

GUARDSMEN 

ANNUAL 

FIELD TRAINING 

53 
During this training, active Army evaluation 

boards inspected each federally recognized Army 

National Guard unit. Board reports concerning 

training and administration were used as a basis for 

corrective action and evaluation, and constituted 40 

percent of the unit rating for this type of training. 

Field Training Evaluation 

PEKCENTAGE 

RATING C r S I 59 60 61 6 1 

Annual General Inspections 

Annual general inspection ratings for 3,827 

ARNG units were reviewed by the Bureau. These 

armory inspections, conducted by representatives of 

Army Area Commanders, generally ascertain the 

degree of excellence in attaining regulatory: 

Equipment Maintenance and Levels 

Unit Organization and Training 

Personnel Qualification 

Records Management 

Immediately apparent in the following table is 

the fact that, for the past five years, almost all Army 

National Guard units consistently received ratings 

of satisfactory and above. Although not shown by 

the table, in fiscal year 1962 approximately 78% of 

the units inspected received excellent or superior 

ratings. 

Annual General Armory Inspections 

SATING % FY SI S9 60 61 62 

Satisfactory and Above 99. 0 99.5 99.1 98. 7 99.2 

Unsatisfactory 1.0 0.5 0.9 1.3 0.8 

School Program 

The objective of the Army National Guard 

School Program is to qualify all individuals to perform satisfactorily in their unit assignments by 

progressive military education. Leaders and skilled 

combat and technical specialists are school-trained 

in this program. 

The school program consists of three principal 

activities: Army Service Schools, Army Area Schools, 

and Officer Candidate Schools. In addition, a considerable number of personnel participate in the 

Satisfactory and Abov e 99. 7 99. 9 98. 9 10 0 100.0 

Unsalisfactory 0.3 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 

Other significant field training accomplishments 

included: 

• Battery level training for many artillery units; 

• Completion and testing of section/platoon 

training with few exceptions. 

• Substantial decrease in minimum standards 

deficiencies. 

A 

54 

A field exercise 
Army Extension Courses which parallel very closely 

courses conducted in Army Service Schools. 

The principal activity in the School Program is 

participation in Army Service Schools. The majority of newly commissioned officers in the Army 

National Guard attend a Branch Officer Orientation 

Course during the first three years of commissioned 

service. These courses are designed to prepare the 

young second lieutenant for his initial assignment 

with troops. The next level in an officer's career is 

attendance at a Branch Career Course, normally 

between his third and twelfth year of commissioned 

service. The scope of this career course is designed 

to prepare the officer to perform duties through Battle 

Group level. 

Each year approximately 100 highly qualified 

National Guard officers are selected to attend a resident course at the US Army Command and General 

Staff College. Priority for selection is given to those 

officers who require this course for promotion to 

colonel in a combat .branch, and for those officers 

whose unit assignment requires C. & G.S.C. training. 

The program also provides excellent schooling 

for enlisted personnel to insure professional and 

technical progress. Enlisted personnel attend those 

critical military occupational specialty (MOS) 

courses which produce a specialist who cannot be 

adequately trained within the unit. 

Each summer, the Army National Guard sends 

30 selected officers to attend a two-week Defense 

Strategy Seminar at the National War College, Washington, D. C. A total of 200 members of all Reserve Components participate in this activity. 

During fiscal year 1962, 7,673 officers and enlisted men attended Army Service Schools. 

The Army Commanders also provide quotas to 

State Adjutants General to send personnel to schools 

administered by their Command. The major input 

into these courses are enlisted personnel who attend 

noncommissioned officer courses. Approximately 

2,000 personnel attend these courses each year. 

Three separate types of Officer Candidate 

Courses are available to qualify enlisted personnel for 

commissions in the Army National Guard. A limited 

number attend the regular 23-week active Army 

Officer Candidate courses. Approximately 700 enlisted personnel participate in Special 10-Week Offiocs 

cer Candidate Courses also conducted by the active 

Army. The third type of Officer Candidate training, 

the State Officer Candidate School Program, produces 

the majority of lieutenants for the Army National 

Guard. Two States, Hawaii and Missouri, established schools during FY 1962, to bring the total of 

State Officer Candidate Schools to 50. The US Army 

Infantry School prepares the Program of Instruction 

for the State OCS Program, and personnel from the 

Infantry School make annual liaison visits. 55 

Guardsmen at Jump School. 
Because many ARNG personnel cannot take 

time from their civilian occupation to attend a resident course of instruction, the Army Extension 

Course Program provides a parallel means for such 

personnel to obtain a military education, offering 

approximately 1,000 separate sub-courses on military 

subjects. Some 50,500 students were enrolled at the 

end of fiscal year 1962. 

56 

Army Aviation 

During FY 1962. the number of ARNG aviators 

on flying status increased from 1,516 to 1,522, a net 

gain of six toward the current authorization of more 

than 3,000. Included in this 1,522 are the 225 aviators who were mobilized. This net gain of six 

ARNG aviators was a considerable reduction in total 

numbers, when compared with the previous five year 

average increase of 125 aviators per year. This 

seemingly large reduction in force was considered to 

be due to the following reasons: 

• Call to active duty of 12 ARNG aviation units 

during the fiscal year with an attendant reduction in 

the recruiting effort normally conducted by personnel 

assigned to these units. 

• Interest shown by potential ARNG aviators in 

response to the recruiting efforts of the active Army, 

due to increased world tensions and the partial 

mobilization. 

• Effects of the Reserve Officer Personnel Act 

(ROPA) on many aviation units because of the 

limited number of promotional vacancies available 

within the present Pentomic division TOEs. 

• The "wait and see" attitude of many potential 

ARNG aviators who were withholding their request 

for ARNG aviation training, pending the outcome 

of the recent cold war "Berlin Crisis." 

The primary sources of aviator procurement 

were: 

• Guardsmen graduated from the U. S. 

Army Aviation School. 

• Recruiting of former rated officers of the 

active Army and other branches of the Armed 

Services by the ARNG. 

ARNG aircraft flying hours totaled 175,921. 

This is a decrease of 973 hours over FY 1961, due 

to the mobilization of 225 ARNG aviators for a 

nine-month period of the fiscal year. It should be 

pointed out however, that each ARNG aviator flew 

an average of 120 hours during the fiscal year. Assuming the 225 ARNG aviators called to active duty 

would have flown an average of 90 hours per aviator, 

during the remaining three quarters of the fiscal year, 

total flying hours would have been 196,171. indicating an increase of 19,277 hours over the previous 

fiscal year. 

ARNG aviators took full advantage of all the 

aviation courses offered by the active Army. Approximately 900 officers and enlisted men with an 

aviation MOS attended the different courses offered. 

A partial breakdown of these courses and the number of Guardsmen in attendance follows: 

Fixed Wing Aviator 1 5 8 

Rotary Wing Aviator 211 

Aircraft Mechanics (fixed and rotary wing) 19 5 

Additional quotas for warrant officer flight training courses have been requested following an increase in requirements for warrant officer aviators, 

necessitated by a recent change t6 the TOE of Division Aviation Companies. 
AIRCRAFT IN USE 

BY THE 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

\ 

-

VIA Otter 

H-13 Sioux 

L-23 Seminole 

L-19 Bird Dog Observation Plane 

L-20 Beaver 

H-23 Raven 

HI 9 Chickasaw 

57 
ARMV NATIONAL GUARD AVIATION 

HUIOIS 

FISCA L TEAR S 

Signal: 48% of the reduced requirement was 

satisfied, leaving a shortage of 39 advisors. 

Overall, ten advisors were gained during the 

fourth quarter. Also, on 30 June 1962, an additional 17 Army Advisors had been nominated to 

the several States but had not as yet been accepted 

or placed on Permanent Change of Station orders. 

STATUS AS OF 30 JUNE 1962 

FISCA L TEAR S 

The accompanying chart shows three years 

growth in aviators and numbers of aircraft assigned. 

Army Advisors 

On 30 June 1962, a total of 829 Army Advisors were on duty or on orders for Army National 

Guard duty. This represents 81.9% of the National Guard Bureau's minimum requirement after 

mobilization. Approximately 50% of the 205 Advisor loss during the fiscal year was due to the Berlin 

mobilization. 

While shortages continue in all branches, the 

most significant are in: 

Engineer: 62% of the reduced requirement was 

satisfied, leaving a shortage of 25 advisors. 

m ii ii i %& m 

TOTALS 1,216 1,112 1,012 129 11.9 -11 3 

Infontry 230 230 218 192 88.1 -2 6 

Artillery 431 382 357 295 82.6 -6 2 

Armor 163 153 131 123 93.9 - 8 

Engineer 77 76 66 41 62.1 -2 5 

Ordnance 91 65 59 57 96.6 - 2 

Signal 98 85 75 36 48.0 -3 9 

Medical 49 46 36 29 80.6 - 7 

Tramportation 50 50 48 43 89.6 - 5 

Military Police 14 12 10 7 70.0 - 3 

Quarterma.ter 8 8 7 6 85.7 - I 

Adjutant General 5 5 5 -_5 _ 

'Ninety-one (91) lo>t due to mobilization in the lecond quarter. 

S 

- 5 2 

- 4 3 

- 3 7 

- 2 4 

- 6 

-26 

- I I 

2 

- 2 

- 1 

LOGISTIC S 

58 

Equipment 

The overall status of equipment in the Army 

National Guard was reduced during FY 1962. 

The reduction resulted from the 1961 active 

Army buildup. Units of the Army National Guard 

not mobilized contributed substantially to the effort 

by releasing more than 10,500 items to meet essential training requirements of Active Army units. 

The fine spirit of cooperation on the part of the 

States in expediting shipment of these items is indicative of their willingness to assist during any crisis. 

Although the items withdrawn consisted mainly 

of those already in short supply, effective training 

was maintained by careful planning to assure maximum utilization of remaining equipment by as many 

units as possible. 

Engineer 

There was no significant change in either the 

on-hand quantity or availability of modern Engineer 

equipment during the past fiscal year. A few modern 

items were received but the quantity was not sufficient to alter the percentage on hand required to 

Honest John rocket fired by a National Guard unit 
meet minimum training requirements. The recent 

build-up of the Active Army resulted in a slowdown 

of attempts to modernize through replacement. 

Ordnance 

A 10% reduction in Ordnance equipment required for training, resulted from the withdrawal of 

more than 10,000 items by Department of Army. 

These items, including wheeled and tracked vehicles, 

self-propelled artillery, and recoilless rifles, were 

shipped by the Army National Guard to meet Department of Army requirements. 

The majority of the remaining Ordnance assets 

are substitute and obsolete items which, although not 

ideal, have been effectively used for training. 

M48 Tank during Exercise Iron Dragon, Fori Polk, La. 

/ Am 

W % i 

/ 

/ 

^^^ 3 ••KB 

•'•"»"»• ! Mi 

Quartermaster 

The overall status of Quartermaster equipment 

improved slightly during FY 1962. New load-carrying equipment was supplied for issue to all Priority 

I units and to some Priority II units. 

Signal 

Although shortage of the new type communication equipment continues to be a problem area, 

many units have, with ingenuity, improvised communication sets with substitute or obsolete equipment. However, shortage of even substitute or obsolete equipment has limited the establishment of a 

sufficient number of these nets for all units. 

M-59 Armored Personnel Carrier of the 49th Armored Divi 

Availability of the general type items of supply 

has been adequate to meet minimum training requirements. 

The withdrawal of Signal equipment by the 

Department of the Army did not adversely affect the 

overall status of Signal equipment in the Army National Guard. 

sion, Texas 

59 

Constructing a double single Bailey Bridge 

Battery of NIKE-A!AX missiles 
Transportation 

The Army National Guard aircraft inventory 

was reduced from that of 30 June 1961 by withdrawal of certain types of fixed wing and rotary wing 

aircraft to meet minimum training requirements of 

Active Army units. This withdrawal resulted in a 

loss of 40 L-19-E and 15 TL-19-D fixed wing aircraft, and 29 H-13-G helicopters. 

Maintenance 

During the past year the maintenance program 

passed a severe test when the National Guard was 

partially mobilized. Due to a closely controlled organizational program with trained personnel, and 

well-organized Combined Field Maintenance Shops. 

it was possible to inspect and perform required repair on all equipment prior to induction. 

Army Area Conferences of State maintenance 

officers were again held during the fall of 1961. The 

prime matter of discussion at each meeting was the 

effect of induction on maintenance from a monetary 

and personnel standpoint. The exchange of ideas 

will lead to smoother action by all concerned when 

and if there is another call. These conferences were 

attended by representatives of each State, Army 

area, technical service, depot, and the National 

Guard Bureau. 

Organizational Maintenance 

Placing responsibility for organizational maintenance at the company and battalion level enabled 

the various unit commanders to ready their equipment for Federal Service with a minimum of time 

lost by travel, and with a greater degree of efficiency. 

Prior to establishing Organizational Maintenance 

Shops and Storage Compounds, unit equipment was 

stored at a central location, often 200 miles from 

the unit's armory. The accomplishment of all organizational maintenance at battalion level reduced 

the need to ship equipment to Combined Field Maintenance Shops, thereby reducing time lost in travel 

and the hazard of moving faulty vehicles over the 

road. Three new Organizational Maintenance Shops 

were activated during the year, bringing the total to 

880, of which 479 facilities were adequate, 254 required modification to buildings, and 147 required 

complete construction of buildings and parking areas. 

Field Maintenance 

There were 393,847 job-orders completed during FY 1961, and 366,328 job-orders completed 

during FY 1962. This drop in output was directly 

due to the induction of units into Federal Service. 

Two Divisions were included in the induction and 

in both cases the Combined Field Maintenance Shops 

lost the responsibility for the repair of all Divisional 

TOE equipment. The work-load in the States from 

which non-Divisional units had been called up was 

also reduced. This decrease was partly off-set by 

a program of repairing not-ready-for-issue equipment received from the Ordnance Corps, the aging 

of equipment, and the Modification Work Order 

Program. The backlog of uncompleted jobs dropped 

from 22,935 reported on 30 June 1961 to 20,804 

as of 30 June 1962. This was due in part to the 

receipt of not-ready-for-issue equipment during the 

fourth quarter FY 1962. 

Maintenance of USAR Equipment 

Authority was granted to the States to enter 

into agreements with USAR units for field maintenance of their equipment. To date, there have been 

7 agreements with USAF Corps and Commands 

—in Arizona, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Texas, 

Nebraska, Florida, and Virginia. There are a number of other States that indicated an interest to negotiate additional USAR contracts. These contracts 

may be entered into when there are adequate National Guard facilities and there is no State law prohibiting the repair or operation of Federal vehicles. 

USAR funds are used to support the cost of both 

personnel and parts supply. 

Army Aircraft Repair Battalions 

Authority was granted for the Army National 

Guard to establish and operate three Army Aircraft Depot Maintenance Shops. These shops are 

located at Groton, Connecticut; Springfield, Missouri; 

and Fresno, California. These aircraft shops are 

used to train 50-man cadres from each battalion, 

each man being a member of a battalion and employed in a technician status. The shops became 

operational during FY 1962 and have completed 

83 jobs as a by-product of training. These three 

shops furnish the National Guard with a limited 

depot rebuild capability. 

Aviation Maintenance 

During FY 1962, Army National Guard aircraft 

flew 175,921 hours and in FY 1961, 176,894 hours. 

for a reduction of 973 hours. 

This reduction in flying hours was due to the loss 

of 55 fixed wing aircraft to the Army, and indue-
tion of 51 with mobilized units, for a total of 106 

fixed wing aircraft lost. In addition, 29 rotary wing 

aircraft were lost by withdrawal by Department of 

the Army, two rotary wing gained and three rotary 

wing lost by accident, for a net loss of 30. Inventory 30 June 1962 shows a gain of 9 flight simulators. 

3 0 June 41—64 9 fixed wing 31 2 rotary wing 

3 0 June 62—54 3 fixed wing 28 2 rotary wing 

—10 6 difference — 3 0 difference 

The total Army National Guard inventory on 30 

June 1962 included 543 fixed wing aircraft, 282 

rotary wing aircraft, and 57 flight simulators. 

Maintenance and Operating Supplies 

The States' operating budgets requested a total 

of $11,399,990 and were funded $8,589,100 for an 

increase of $209,000 over FY 1961. These additional funds were used to accomplish deferred maintenance. The difference between the States' request 

and the actual funding program prevented the States 

from bringing stocks to requistioning objectives and 

stocking full unit base loads. The 2.6% increase in 

expenditures over the previous year was the result of 

transfers to the P7411 fund from other projects after 

induction of units into Federal Service. 

Inventory Management 

During FY-1962 the Army National Guard 

inventory requirements were reduced to the minimum 

essentials as a result of fiscal funding limitations. 

The chart below, "Assets to Requirements," has 

been prepared in millions of dollars from Financial 

Inventory Accounting data as of 30 June 1962. 

Value of those items of supply which were demanded 

on a recurring basis only, and procured with National Guard funds, have been included. Fringe 

items, Mission Essential items, and other nonrecurring funded items and requirements have not been 

included. 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

ASSETS VERSUS REQUIREMENTS 

TITIL FUNDED PIOIECI 7050 PROJECT 7321 PI0IEC7 7411 

!«»E«T0«t l»V[KT0ir IHVEMT0P.1 UHEHTOIT 

Chart bar entitled "Total Funded Inventory" indicates total assets valued at $6-million on hand and 

on order to meet a $7.3-million requirement. The 

$7.3-million requirement represents a $600,000 reduction since last year, resulting from the limitation 

of funds available to the Guard. 

Project 7050, Individual Clothing; Project 7321, 

Organizational Equipment; and Project 7411, Repair Parts, show shortage of assets on hand and 

on order due to lack of funds to procure necessary 

items of supply to meet minimum requirements. 

Disposition of Excess Property 

Continued emphasis was placed on disposal of 

excess property during FY 1962. Excess property 

on hand, at the beginning of the fiscal year, was 

valued at $21.6 million. During the year, $106.4 

million was generated and disposition was made of 

$94.8 million, leaving a balance on hand of $33.2 

million. Thus there was a net increase of $11.6 

million in excess inventory on hand in the States 

as of the close of FY 1962. 

The large excess generated during the year resulted primarily from the reorganization of units. 

Obsolescence and ordinary wear and tear were also 

contributing factors. The $33.2 million reported 

excess balance on hand at the close of FY 1962 

was awaiting disposition instructions. 

Disposition of the $94.8 million excess was as 

follows: 

• $7.4 million was utilized by the Army National Guard. This represents items which, after 

being listed as excess by various Army National 

Guard installations, were later withdrawn from 

the excess inventory to meet requirements in the 

Army National Guard. 

• $62.2 million was utilized by the Department of the Army. $42 million of this figure included items returned to depot stock. The remaining $20.2 million was redistributed within 

the Department of the Army. 

• $17.3 million represents excess items transferred to Property Disposal. 

• $7.9 million represents items transferred 

to other Federal, State, and private agencies, and 

adjustments for accounting and other purposes. 

This amount includes transfers in the amount of 

$290,000 to the Department of the Navy, $250,-

000 to the Department of the Air Force, and $4.8 

million to other Federal agencies. 
INST A LLATION S 

FEDERAL support for construction of facilities required by the Army National Guard is provided for in the National Defense Facilities Act of 

1950. Funds have been available for this purpose 

since 1952. Under this Act of 1950, contributions 

to the States cannot exceed 75 percent of the cost 

of the construction to which it is applied. These 

funds may be used for the acquisition, construction, 

expansion, rehabilitation, or conversion, by a State, 

of additional facilities required by any increase in 

troop strength. Contributions for non-armory facilities and contributions required to expand, rehabilitate, or convert facilities owned by the States or to 

acquire, construct, expand, rehabilitate, or convert 

Non-Armory Projects 

Total » 

Training Facilities 5 

Warehouse 2 

Warehouse Conversion 1 

Combined Field Maintenance Shop with USP&FO 

Office and Warehouse 1 

(Not included are 8 minor construction projects) 

Total Non-Armory Obligations $ 4,170,980 41 

Total A/E Obligations 631,036.00 

Total Minor Construction Obligations 394,298.02 

Total All Obligations 16,883,374.96 

A complete State-by-State study conducted in 

1959, based on reorganization of the Army National 

Guard to the Pentomic Concept, determined that 

there was an overall requirement for 2,732 armory 

facilities to house, administer and train all units 

adequately. 

The chart entitled "Total Armory Facilities— 

30 June 1962" shows by the left bar that the total 

armory facilities requirement is 2,732. The middle 

bar shows that 2,067 facilities are adequate and were 

completed prior to FY 1963. Of these, 729 are 

State constructed armories and 1,338 have been constructed with Federal participation. The right bar 

indicates the remaining requirements for FY 1963 

and subsequent years to be 665 armory projects. Of 

these, 335 are proposed new armory projects and 330 

are for the alteration, expansion, or conversion of 

armories. 

62 

additional facilities made necessary by the conversion, redesignation, or reorganization of their units 

are supported entirely by federal funds. 

In the period from FY 1953 through FY 1962, 

Federal support for armory construction totaled 

$159.2 million and for non-armory construction approximately $27.8 million. 

Facilities placed under contract in FY 1962 

were as follows: 

Armory Projects 

Total 101 

Complete Armories 93 

Expansions 3 

Rehabilitations 2 

Conversions 2 

Alterations and Additions 1 

(Not included are 4 minor construction projects) 

Total Armory Obligations $ 11,687,060.53 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

TOTAL ARMORY FACILITIES 

30 JUNE 19(2 

COMPLETED KEMA1HIHG •EQUIDCMENT 

FT 19(3 FOIKIID 
The Federal contribution required to complete 

the total armory construction program amounts to 

approximately $239 million. Of this amount, Congress has appropriated $179.8 million through FY 

1962, leaving $59.2 million as the remaining appropriation for FY 1963 and future years. 

The chart below shows armory construction obligations for FY 1953 through FY 1962, under the 

provisions of the National Defense Facilities Act of 

1950, as amended. 

M l 1954 1955 1956 1957 1991 1959 1960 1961 196! 

H U H 11 >< s 

Also under the provisions of the National Defense Facilities Act of 1950, $30,374,275 (including 

$2,630,587.00 eviction funds) has been obligated 

for non-armory construction through FY 1962. 

These funds provided for the following types of 

construction projects: 

COMBINED FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOPS 

These shops are authorized for construction on the 

basis of one per State. However, in States with two 

or more divisions, authorized Field Training Equipment Concentration Sites, or unusual geographical 

considerations as in Hawaii, additional shops or subshops are authorized. Field maintenance of all Federal equipment issued to the State, except aircraft, 

is performed at these facilities. As of 30 June 1962, 

Federal funds have been utilized in the construction 

of 40 Combined Field Maintenance Shops. 

ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOPS 

These shops are authorized for each battalion, or 

comparable organization, or grouping of units. 

Organizational maintenance is performed at these 

facilities on all Federal equipment, except aircraft, 

issued to the battalion, or comparable organization 

or grouping of units. A total of 114 organizational 

maintenance shops have been constructed with Federal funds since the inception of this construction 

program. 

ARMY AVIATION MAINTENANCE SHOPS 

These shops are authorized for construction on 

the basis of one per State for each State having five 

or more assigned aircraft. For States having two 

Divisions, two such shops are provided. All organizational and field maintenance on Army fixed and 

rotary wing aircraft and allied equipment issued to 

the State is performed at these facilities. Thirty-three 

Shop Hangars have been built with Federal funds 

from the beginning of the construction program. 

UNITED STATES PROPERTY & FISCAL 

OFFICER OFFICE & WAREHOUSE 

An office and warehouse is authorized each 

State for use by the United States Property and 

Fiscal Officer in the administration, receipt, storage, 

and issue of all Federal property required for use by 

the Army National Guard. Federal funds have been 

used in the construction of 17 USP&FO Offices and 

26 USP&FO Warehouses, as of 30 June 1962. 

REAL PROPERTY 

The Bureau renders all possible assistance to 

the States in licensing appropriate federally owned 

facilities and in leasing certain types of privately 

owned facilities for Army National Guard use. 

During FY 1962 the Army National Guard 

utilized the following types of facilities: 

2 2 8 federally owned facilities 

121 Privately owned facilities under Federal lease, 

including: 

41 Army Advisor Offices 

54 Target Range Sites 

2 2 Aircraft Facilities 

3 USP&FO Offices 

1 Organizational Maintenance Shop 

The Bureau screened excess federally-owned 

real properties with the States and advised and assisted them in the acquisition of such properties 

when required by the Army National Guard. 
Repairs and Utilities FY 1962 

Approximately $3,173,874 was obligated to 

maintain, repair and operate Army National Guard 

Facilities under 52 service contract agreements executed with the various States. 

Approximately $72,378 was obligated to maintain and repair 27 Firing Ranges. 

Approximately $3,354 was obligated for two 

Armory projects of $10,000 and under. 

Approximately $781,878 was obligated for 51 

major R&U Construction projects over $2,000.00. 

Approximately $228,552 was obligated for 96 

minor R&U Construction projects under $2,000.00. 

This includes the alterations to various inadequate Organizational Maintenance Shops for 18 battery rooms, 47 wash racks, 26 hardstand areas and 

nine security fencing projects for the efficient storage 

and maintenance of vehicle equipment at Battalion 

level. 

Troop Facilities at Field Training Sites 

These facilities are designed to provide the essential requirements for support of Army National 

Guard units during their period of annual field training. Facilities may include kitchens, mess halls, bath 

latrines, supply and administrative buildings, headquarters buildings and barracks. 

A total of $4,249,917 was obligated to support 

the opening, operating and closing of annual field 

training sites. Of this amount, $2,643,104 was obligated at 74 federally controlled training sites and 

$1,060,813 at 39 State controlled training sites. 

These are listed as follows: 

Federally Controlled Installations 

Fort McClellan, Ala. 

Fort Richardson, Alaska 

Fort Chaffee, Ark. 

Fort Huachuea, Ariz. 

Benicia Arsenal, Calif. 

Camp Roberts, Calif. 

Fort Irwin, Calif. 

Fort McArthur, Calif. 

Fort Ord, Calif. 

Hammer Field, Calif. 

Los Angeles Defense 

Missile Sites, 

Los Angeles, Calif. 

San Francisco Defense 

Missile Sites, 

San Francisco, Calif. 

Sharpe General Depot, Calif. 

United States Naval Base, 

Coronado, Calif. 

Fort Carson, Colo. 

Hartford-Bridgeport Defense 

Missile Sites, Conn. 

Bethany Beach, Del. 

Atlanta General Depot, 

Atlanta, Ga . 

Fort Benning, Ga . 

Fort Gordon, Ga . 

Schofield Barracks, Hawaii 

Pohakuloo, Hawaii 

Chicago Defense Missile Sites, 

Chicago, III. 

Fort Sheridan, III. 

Granite City Engineer Depot, 

Granite City, III. 

Fort Benjamin Harrison, Ind. 

Fort Riley, Kans. 

Camp Breckenridge, Ky 

Fort Campbell, Ky. 

Fort Knox, Ky. 

Camp Leroy Johnson, LaFort Polk, La. 

Baltimore, Maryland— 

Washington, D. C. 

Defense Missile Sites 

Fort Holabird, Md. 

Fort Meade, Md . 

Boston, Massachusetts— 

Providence, Rhode Island 

Defense Missile Sites 

Fort Devens, Mass. 

Otis Air Force Base, Mass. 

Detroit Defense Missile 5ites, 

Detroit, Mich. 

Selfridge Air Force Base, 

Mich. 

Fort Hancock, N. J. 

Camp Drum, N. Y. 

Fort Wadsworth, N. Y. 

Niagara-Buffalo Defense 

Missile Sites, N. Y. 

New York City Defense Missile 

Sites, N. Y., N. Y, 

Fort Bragg, N. C. 

Cleveland Defense 

Missile Sites, 

Cleveland, Ohio 

Erie Ord Depot, Ohio 

Fort Sill, Okla. 

Beaver Army Terminal, Ore. 

Indian town Gap Military 

Reservation, Pa. 

New Cumberland General 

Depot, Pa. 

Philadelphia Defense Missile 

Sites, Philadelphia, Pa. 

Pittsburgh Defense Missile 

Sites, Pittsburgh, Pa. 

Tobyhanna Signal Depot, 

Tobyhanna, Pa. 

Salinas Training Area, 

Salinas, P. R. 

Fort Jackson, S. C. 

Brook Army Medical Center, Tex. 

Fort Bliss, Tex. 

Fort Hood, Tex. 

Camp A. P. Hill, Va . 

Camp Pickett, Va. 

Fort Belvoir, Va . 

Fort Eustis, Va. 

Fort Lee, Va. 

Fort Story, Va. 

Norfolk Defense Missile Sites, 

Norfolk, Va . 

United States Army Signal 

Intelligence School, 

Arlington, Va. 

Fort Lewis, Wash. 

Seattle Defense Missile Sites, 

Seattle, Wash. 

Yakima Firing Center, 

Yakima, Wash. 

Camp McCoy, WiseMilwaukee Defense Missile Sites, 

Milwaukee, Wise. 

State Controlled Installations 

Camp Robinson, Ark. 

Camp San Luis Obispo, Calif. 

Camp Dempsey, Conn. 

Bethany Beach, Dela. 

Fort Blanding, Fla. 

Fort Stewart, Ga . 

Travis Field, Ga . 

Fort Ruger, Hawaii 

Gowen Field, Idaho 

Camp Dodge, Iowa 

Hutchinson Air National 

Guard Base, Kan. 

Camp Beauregard, La. 

Camp Keyes, Me. 

Camp Curtis Guild, Mass. 

Camp Grayling, Mich. 

Camp Ripley, Minn. 

Camp Shelby, Miss. 

Fort William H. Harrison, Mont. 

Camp Ashland, Neb. 

Camp Powell, N. H. 

National Guard Training 

Center, Sea Girt, N. J. 

Camp Smith, N. Y. 

Camp Grafton, N. D. 

Camp Perry, Ohio 

Camp Rilea, Ore. 

Camp Withycombe, Ore. 

Camp Tortuguero, P. R. 

Camp Varnum, R. I. 

Camp Rapid, S. D. 

Camp Mabry, Tex. 

Camp Williams, Utah 

State Military Reservation, Va . 

Camp Johnson, Vt. 

Underhill Training Area, 

Underhill, Vt. 

Camp Murray, Wash. 

Port of Tacoma, Wash. 

Camp Dawson, W. V. 

Two Rivers, Wise. 

Camp Guernsey, Wyo. 
Air National Quard 

FOREWOR D 

NO ONE can look back on Air National Guard activities of FY 1962 without a sense 

of deep satisfaction. During the partial mobilization for Berlin, ANG units demonstrated 

the effectiveness and professionalism of Air Reserve forces. The entire Air Reserve concept 

received a big boost, as a matter of fact, from the outstanding performance of the units called 

to active duty to meet the expanding requirements of the nation's defense establishment. 

Echoes of justifiable praise for these citizen-airmen continue to find their way into public 

attention. 

The Air Guard's strength and inventory, as shown in this report, necessarily reflect 

the loss of these units to the active Air Force. Nevertheless, the units which remained on 

State status continued to play a vital role in the nation's defense posture. For, in performing 

their roles and missions in a reserve status, they, indeed, prepared themselves for any eventuality in the future. 

During FY 1962 ANG pilots flew 329,142 hours and established the best flying safety 

record in Air Guard history, a rate of 10.86 accidents per 100,000 flying hours. 

At year end, total personnel assigned to the ANG stood at 50,319, including 10,858 

air technicians. 

Many other strides that demonstrate the capable and professional manner in which Air 

Guardsmen pursue their duty were made during the past fiscal year. How the Air Guard 

moved ahead on many fronts is illustrated on the following pages. 

COMPTROLLE R 

Budget 

The President's budget estimate for FY 1962 

contained requirements for the Air National Guard 

for Military Construction, Operations and Maintenance, and National Guard Personnel, Air Force. 

These estimates were prepared on program guidance 

available at the time of submission. Based on the 

justifications in support of these estimated requirements the Congress appropriated the requested funds 

as follows: Military Construction, $18,275,000; Operations and Maintenance, $199,758,000; and Air 

National Guard Personnel, $47,000,000. In addition 

to the appropriations, there were anticipated reimbursements of $1 million in the Operations and 

Maintenance area and $129,000 in the National 

Guard Personnel area making a total overall availability of $266,162,000. These appropriations were 

based on budget estimates for the full force. 
Continuous progress was made in the ANG Military Construction Program in the provision of facilities in accordance with approved programs, force 

structure, and equipment objectives. Since appropriations in support of this program are cumulative 

or "no year" appropriations, progress from a financial point of view is therefore being expressed in like 

terms. Against a total FY 1962 availability of $28,-

232,812—which included $18,275,000 of new appropriation and $2,500,000 transferred in accordance with Section 638, Public Law 87-144—construction agencies awarded contracts and obligated 

funds in the amount of $19,633,000, or 70% of the 

program. Additionally, projects totalling $5,425,000 

were advertised for bids leaving only one project, 

with an estimated cost of $1 million for future advertising and award. The balance of unobligated 

funds is represented by government cost of construction projects in process. 

Subsequent to the appropriation and apportionment of funds, the announcement was made that 

certain units of the Air National Guard would be 

activated as a result of the Berlin Crisis. This action 

had an adverse effect on the planned and funded 

programs within all three appropriations, since approximately one third of the ANG units were alerted. 

The impact was such that revisions could not be made 

on any firm basis, but rather on a day-by-day basis 

as the change in requirements developed. Consequently, no changes were made in the fund availability during the first two quarters of the fiscal year. 

However, during that period many actions were 

taken in the final preparation of these units for "M" 

Day. 

These actions represented such things as increased budget authorizations and funding to enable 

these activated units to procure materiels, supplies, 

equipment, and additional civilian personnel in the 

Operations and Maintenance areas. Increased unit 

drills and active duty for training mandays were authorized to provide increased training. As a result, 

all units were fully prepared and ready for deployment within thirty days of activation. Also, during 

mobilization, agreements were made with the gaining 

commands for the Air National Guard to continue 

existing service contracts as amended, where necessary. This action expedited the transition considerably, and resulted in tremendous savings to the 

Federal Government in the negotiation or renegotiation of contract agreements. 

As a result of the mobilization, adjustments 

were made in the Operation and Maintenance and 

the National Guard Personnel appropriations availability to reflect savings due to the fact that many 

units were on active duty. These adjustments represented changes in the flying hour program; changes 

downward in both the civilian and military strengths, 

as well as lower costs in Operations and Maintenance; 

and lower costs in the military personnel area such 

as drill pay, clothing, subsistence, and other related 

costs. 

Beginning with the third quarter these adjustments were made in the fund availability to reflect 

the decreased dollar requirement as a result of the 

mobilization. In making such adjustments consideration was given to costs that would be incurred 

in the preparation of the deactivation of mobilized 

units beginning in July 1962. Such costs were the 

preparation of facilities and other necessities to 

enable immediate resumption of training to attain 

the highest possible "C" rating. 

In reviewing the accomplishments for the fiscal 

year, it was noted that the funding for the projected 

programs of unaltered units was met in a highly satisfactory manner. 

The following table represents the funding status 

of the appropriations for the entire Fiscal Year 1962. 

Appropriation Appropriated ' Adjusted

 2 Obligated Par cont 

Military Construction. S 18,275,000 t 28,233,000 $ 19,633,000 70.0% 

Operation! t. Moint.. 200,758,000 179,758,000 171,603,000 95.5% 

Military Personnel... 47,129,000 45,329,000 44,187,000 97.5% 

Total $266,162,000 $253,320,000 $235,423,000 — 

r

 Includes anticipated reimbursements. 

2

 Includes prior year funds in Military Construction and reflects third quarter 

adjustments in O&M end National Guard Personnel as a result of mobilisation. 

Punch-Card Mechanization Program 

As a follow-up to a base mechanization test conducted by the ANG Detachment at McGuire AFB, 

N. J. during FY 1961, 14 Air National Guard bases 

received punch-card data processing equipment during FY 1962. These bases are located throughout 

the United States and can serve as on-the-job training sites for personnel at other nearby ANG locations which may be mechanized in the future. 

Technical training is provided by the equipment manufacturer. Applications were programmed for the 

following: supply, maintenance manhour and data 

collection, and dollar accounting. As of 30 June 

1962, eight bases had converted the supply account 

and others were in various phases of conversion. It 

is anticipated that an additional six months experience 

will be required for machine room personnel to 

attain a high level of proficiency in the basic applications. 
PERSONNEL 

On 30 June 1962, the federally recognized 

strength of the Air National Guard was 50,319. This 

figure was approximately 1.3% short of the programmed fiscal year-end strength of 51,000. Air 

National Guard drill pay ceiling was reduced from 

72,000 to 51,000 to reflect the loss of the 21,067 

Air National Guard personnel who entered active 

Federal service as members of mobilized units. 

For comparison purposes, ANG personnel 

strengths for Fiscal Year 1957 through Fiscal Year 

1962 are shown below. 

Air National Guard Strength (Federally Recognized) 

Total 

Airmen 

Fiscal Year 

1937 

67,950 

8,033 

59,917 

Fiscal Year 

19SI 

69,99 5 

8,354 

61,641 

Filcal Year 

1959 

70,994 

8,473 

62,521 

Fltcal Year 

1960 

70,820 

8,570 

62,250 

Fltcal Year 

1961 

70,895 

8,718 

62,177 

Fiscal Year 

1961 

50,319 

6,278 

44,041 

Programmed 

72,000 

8,700 

63,300 

Procurement of Military Personnel 

Approximately 91% of the officers procured to 

fill existing vacancies during the year came from three 

sources: Air Force Reserve, direct commission of 

ANG airmen, and individuals from certain civilian 

professions. 

Officers 

Officer Promotions 

During FY 1962, the following unit vacancy 

promotions were made: 

Brigadier general to major general 1 

Colonel to brigadier general (6 tenure of office, 

5 other) 11 

Lieutenant colonel to colonel 10 

Major to lieutenant colonel 6 4 

Captain to major 34 3 

First lieutenant to captain 41 4 

Second lieutenant to first lieutenant 22 6 

Warrant officers are promoted only after selection by the warrant officer selection board. During 

the fiscal year, 114 such promotions were accomplished. 

Mandatory selection boards convened during 

FY 1962 resulted in the following selection and deferrals: 

Considered 

First lieutenant to captain 64 6 

Captain to major 26 3 

Major to lieutenant colonel 1 3 

Tolol 92 4 

sleeted 

593 

250 

3 

146 

Passed Over 

1st lime 

4 2 

1 1 

9 

6 2 

2d time 

13 

2 

1 

16 

Officers Age by Grade 

30 Jun 62 

Total Officer 

General Colonel It. Col. Major Captain I stir. 2nd Lt. W/ O Total 

46.7 46.4 43.8 40.2 33.7 28.8 25.4 25.4 34.6 

Tolol Pilot 

General Colonel It. Col. Major Captain 1 St Lt. 2nd Lt. W/ O Total 

46.6 43.7 41.9 39.4 32.3 28.2 25.0 34.0 

Officer Longevity 

30 Jun 62 

Average years of service by grade 

General Colonel Lt. Col. Major Captain 1 sr Lt. 2nd Lt. W/ O Total 

23.5 22.7 20.9 18.6 12.1 7.8 4.8 17.8 13.0 

Average years of service of officers on flying status 

General Colonel Lt. Col. Major Captain 1 St Lt. 2nd Lt. W/ O Total 

20.0 19.9 19.7 18.7 11.3 7.4 4.5 12.4 

Grade Distribution Of Pilots by Type 

30 Jun 62 

Sen. Col. L C Ma|. Capl 1 si It. 2nd Lt. Total 

Aircrew Jet 8 19 79 206 449 307 47 1115 

Aircrew Non-Jet 8 13 50 197 354 184 23 829 

Opnl. Support 19 17 38 31 32 5 1 143 

Admin. Support 5 34 67 38 13 3 160 

Officer Effectiveness Reports 

The Air Personnel Division, NGB, continued 

its efforts toward improving the quality of officer 

effectiveness reports and toward timely report submissions. Special emphasis was placed on making 

overall ANG ratings more compatible with those 

rendered by regular Air Force personnel. In this 

connection, 35mm slides were prepared for each 

officer grade showing ANG ratings in comparison 

with USAF ratings. In addition to use in briefings 

conducted by Bureau personnel, these slides, with a 

suggested briefing and a sample selection folder, were 

made available as a package loan to ANG units. 
Twenty five units borrowed the slides and commented 

highly on their guidance value. 

Every indication is that overall ratings for the 

past year more properly reflect the manner in which 

ANG officers have performed their duties. Consequently, there is greater assurance today that the 

ANG officer will receive the same consideration for 

promotion as received by the Reserve officer on extended active duty. 

Airmen 

When the Air National Guard drill pay ceiling 

was reduced to 51,000 the annual input of non-prior 

service airmen was reduced from 7600 to 5600. 

This resulted in airmen strength of the Guard dropping drastically during the last half of the fiscal year. 

Again this year, there has been an increase in the 

proportion of older non-prior service airmen enlisted. 

Airmen gains (non-prior, by age group, and prior 

service) are shown on the attached chart for FY 

1957 through 1962. 

P!RC[N| ANG AIRMEN GAINS FY 58 - FY 62 

oi Mas 

ID 1 LEGEND: 

HON PRIOR SERVICE 

t t ! GROUP 

1)18!-, t«i 

It t OVER • 

so

 H PRIOR SERIItE (SSI 

EI 51 El 59 El N El tl EI (2 

As a result of the large number of non-prior 

service enlistees of FY 1955 who completed their 

military obligation during FY 1962, the attrition 

rate rose from 15.2% in Fiscal Year 1961 to 16.8% 

in Fiscal Year 1962. 

During the year 68.1 % of the airmen whose enlistments had expired re-enlisted without a break in 

service. 

AIRMEN LOSSES - FY 1962 

LOSSES >Y MADE 

mi. il mist n m cinriKii 

K mil una: J 

KCI ii Emm II as m n 

itm nu II us. i 

Enlistments 

Public Law 87-378, 4 October 1961, amended 

32 USC 302 to provide a flexible enlistment period 

for the National Guard, which was implemented 

effective 1 January 1962 for the Air National Guard 

in the following manner: Non-prior service enlistees 

are now required to enlist for a period of six years 

instead of three, as in the past. Jndividuals with 

prior military service may enlist for either three or 

six years; those with a remaining military service 

obligation (MSO) must enlist for either three or six 

years whichever is sufficient to cover the unexpired 

portion of their obligation. Those who have more 

than six years remaining on their MSO are enlisted 

for the number of full years required to complete 

the obligation, i.e., seven or eight. (This applies to 

those individuals who initially entered military service in the Air Force Reserve, Army Reserve, or 

Naval Reserve under the provisions of 50 USC 1013 

and acquired an eight year obligation.) Reenlistments are for a period of three or six years. Those 

States in which the State Code precluded enlistment 

in excess of three years were granted waivers to continue enlisting all individuals for a period of three 

years pending action to amend the State Code. Of 

the five States thus affected, one has already changed 

the State Code to conform to enlistment requirements. 

Airman Age by Grade 

30 Jun 62 

E-9 E-8 E-7 E-6 E-5 

40.1 38.8 36.5 32.3 28.4 

Airmen 

30 J 

Average years of serv ce by grade 

E-9 E-8 E-7 E-6 E-5 

16.8 15.8 13.7 10.7 7.9 

Airman on Flying Status 

E-9 E-8 E-7 E-6 E-5 

13.0 14.3 13.1 11.2 8.7 

E-4 

25.4 

E-3 

24.1 

Longevity 

un 62 

E-4 

4.6 

E-4 

4,7 

E-3 

3.0 

E-3 

2.4 

E-2 

23.1 

E-2 

1.3 

E-2 

1.1 

E-l 

21.9 

E-l 

.9 

E-l 

Total 

26.4 

Total 

5.1 

Total 

8.0 

Aptitude and Specialty Knowledge Testing 

Specialty Knowledge Testing 

Specialty Knowledge Tests measure job knowledge and are used in conjunction with other criteria 

for upgrading airmen to the next higher skill level 

of their specialty. 

The slight reduction in the number of airmen 

tested during this fiscaf year is attributable to airmen on active duty in mobilized units. However, 

9,796 airmen were tested, of whom 57% were in 

the "Unquestionably Qualified" category. (Tests for 
upgrading to the 3-level are administered and scored 

locally, and are not included in these figures.) Breakdown by 5- and 7-skill level is as follows: 

Ltvil 

5 

7 

No. Toftod 

7,637 

2,159 

% Unquestionably 

Qualified 

59 

47 

Other Personnel Research Tests 

No significant change in aptitude tests utilized 

by the Air National Guard occurred during FY 1962. 

During the year, 788 USAF Supervisory Examinations (USAFSE) were administered to airmen for the purpose of determining prerequisite supervisory aptitude for promotion to "super grade" 

(E-8 & E-9) positions. 74.4% obtained passing 

scores. 

Master Personnel Records 

In December 1961, the Air Personnel Division 

of the National Guard Bureau assumed responsibility for maintaining the master personnel records 

of ANG officers, except for general officers' records which will continue to be maintained by Hq 

USAF as in the past. These records were transferred 

to the Bureau due to the urgent requirement for 

space by the Department of Defense. Due to nonavailability of a feasible operating location, and 

pending assignment of personnel, these records were 

stored in the D.C. Armory for approximately 60 

days. However, by elimination of duplicate documents through comparison of the master personnel 

records with the Bureau files, the transfer of "dead" 

files to the D.C. Armory, and the purchase of spacesaving filing equipment, the master personnel records are now housed within the National Guard 

Bureau area of the Pentagon. Assumption of the 

responsibility for maintaining these records will result in a drastic reduction of time in producing them 

for action agencies, from an average of 2'/i days 

to less than ten minutes. It is also now possible 

that visiting officers may immediately review their 

records, whereas two to three hours advance notice 

was previously required by Hq USAF. 

Retirement Records 

The Bureau has continued its special project of 

perfecting retirement records of ANG officers to reduce lengthy searching and processing time after 

receipt of applications for retirement. Retirement 

applications are expected to be submitted in large 

numbers during the next several years. 

Air National Guard Register 

The bookkeeping required in connection with 

the ANG Register was mechanized during FY 

1962. Applications for appointment submitted by 

the States now include an EAM card, punched with 

all the data necessary to enter the new appointee 

in the Register. Cards are likewise submitted with 

applications for promotion and with discharge orders, 

thus eliminating much manual posting and reducing 

the possibility of errors. 

Air Technicians 

Air technician strength dropped from 13,810 

on 30 June 1961 to 10,858 employed on 30 June 

1962. There were 13,987 on board in August when 

units were alerted for mobilization. By November 

approximately 3,900 air technicians were in active 

Federal service. The majority of these personnel 

had previous service in World War II or the Korean 

conflict. Their experience and high degree of skills 

were of much value in keeping administrative problems associated with mobilization to a minimum. 

ANG TECHNICIAN PROGRAM - FY 1962 

IAN MONTHS HTML K PIKU I 

L^ 

111 riiiiirii •llllllllll l 

iiiiiiiri i 

ANG Air Technicians at work. 
Air technician manning was increased for some 

units converting to heavy transport and refueling 

type aircraft. Communications units received spaces 

to bring them up to minimum manning for their increased workload. 

The full-time Guardsmen gained a step in the 

long struggle for normal benefits of public employTHE AIR National Guard Medical Service is 

organized to provide medical personnel and units 

trained and equipped to operate medical facilities 

in support of ANG operational requirements including aeromedical evacuation. 

The Medical Service is composed of 72 units 

and 55 elements made up as follows: 

11 Tactical Hospitals 

45 USAF Dispensaries 

2 Aeromedical Transport Groups 

9 Aeromedical Transport Squadrons 

5 Aeromedical Evacuation Squadrons 

Manning and combat ready capabilities have 

progressed very satisfactorily during the past year. 

Factors contributing to this level of improvement 

are: a higher ratio of officers assigned; continued improvement of medical facilities; continued procurement of first line medical diagnostic and therapeutic 

equipment and supplies; broadening of medical functions and responsibilities; and raising of professional 

and technical capabilities of personnel and units 

through formal and unit training programs. 

ment when authorization was given for Federal funds 

to be used for payment into State retirement systems. Several States have signed the necessary agreements and have received payments for the approved 

portion of the employer's contribution. 

Army-Air Force Wage Board increases were authorized throughout the year on a quarterly basis. 

The continued training of airmen in the aeromedical field preceptorship or on-the-job training at 

Andrews, Travis and Scott Air Force Bases and a 

four week training period with MATS Aeromedical 

Unit have been highly effective and has speeded 

up the AFSC qualification of airmen in this field. In 

addition, it has been of great benefit in augmenting 

the patient care program at the hospitals. 

Manning authorizations are being revised for 

USAF Dispensaries, Tactical Hospitals and medical 

elements organic to separate Tactical Air Transport 

and Troop Carrier Squadrons. These revisions were 

designed to fulfill medical support operational needs 

of the gaining commands. 

Excellent progress has been made in furnishing 

ANG medical units and elements with modern fixedtype equipment and supplies. The allowances for 

medical equipment in the ANG have undergone 

major revisions. To support this, budgetary requirements were justified and funds provided to equip 

each medical facility adequately. 

During the past year, the ANG completed the 

procurement of 70% Phase I equipment sets for the 

USAF and Department of Defense Medical Materiel Program for Nuclear Casualties. This also includes training sets. 

During FY 1962, the National Guard Bureau 

screened Medical property assets, both through State 

and gaining command channels and arranged for 

disposal instructions for all excesses. 

The following Medical elements were mobilized 

in connection with the Berlin situation: 

7 Tactical Hospitals (5 deployed) 

8 USAF Dispensaries 

2 Aeromedical Squadrons 

6 Aeromedical Flights 
For the most part these units were in a good 

state of readiness. Short deployment notice did pinpoint the necessity for having on hand unit mission 

equipment. Manning of the units was good except 

in the case of newly organized Aeromedical Evacuation Squadrons and Flights. Filler actions were accomplished by Air Reserve Records Center in the 

case of airmen and the Surgeon General, United 

States Air Force, in the case of officers. 

Physical examinations required in connection 

with entry on active duty were accomplished prior 

to active duty in most instances. This was done 

through the combined efforts of National Guard, 

Reserve and active Air Force Medical personnel and 

facilities. Less than 1 % of personnel examined were 

found disqualified for active duty. A critical analysis 

of the priority of effort in accomplishing those examinations led to the conclusion that Air National 

Guard personnel could and should comply with 

physical examination directives more nearly applicable to the active components of the Air Force, 

thereby reducing the requirement for examinations 

in connection with entry on active duty. 

The five deployed TAC Hospitals lost their unit 

mobility equipment and some unit support equipment as a result of decisions to leave such equipment in place. This means that five such hospitals 

will be without UME until sometime in FY 64. 

OPERATION S AN D TRAININ G 

Air National Guard Force Structure 

Federally Recognized Units 

As of 30 June 1962 

COMBAT FLYING ORGANIZATIONS 

Type Wings Groups Squadrons 

Fighter Interceptor (AD) 7 2 i 25 

Tocticol Fighter 2 — 3 

Tactical Reconnaissance 2 — 7 

Air Refueling 1 3 3 

Troop Carrier — 4 4 

NON-TACTICAL FLYING ORGANIZATIONS 

Air Transport (Heavy) 3 9 9 

Aeromedical — 2 9 

Air Transport (Medium) — — 1 

GROUND COMMUNICATIONS ORGANIZATIONS 

4 Communication Group Hq 6 AC&W Squadrons (Fixed) 

1 2 Communication Squadrons 1 Tactical Control Group 

8 Radio Relay Squadrons 1 Tactical Control Squadron 

2 Communication Maintenance 6 AC&W Squadrons 

Squadrons 2 Communication Squadrons 

1 Communication Squadron 9 AFCS Flights 

(Special) 22 Weather Flights 

1 5 GEEIA Squadrons 

Organization 

On 30 June 1962, the Air National Guard had 

454 Federally recognized units organized into 15 

wings, 46 groups and 61 tactical squadrons. It had 

an authorized strength of 64,166, exclusive of units 

on active duty. These figures represent a decrease 

of 151 units and a loss of 24,170 in authorized 

strength, due primarily to the mobilization of the 

ANG units last fall for the Berlin crisis. 

Training 

Maximum use was made of training devices and 

instructor teams in the FY 1962 training programs. 

Other training aids necessary for training personnel 

of units making a transition to new aircraft were 

distributed to each unit, and Mobile Training Detachments (MTDs) were provided these units by the 

Air Training Command. These detachments, assigned at each base for three to four months, are 

composed of qualified instructors and equipment 

necessary to familiarize personnel with the various 
JSfe AIR NATIONAL GUARD FACILITIES AND ORGANIZATION 

X-A />— ^ .-.-•'•'••i-r-WT.*,-:;: 

••• • i-"-L%-':^ / *j£s&!*rt. »-^""':.^^ ! 

V (.AL-. 

*.-:.*. 

72 

systems within and procedures for the new aircraft. 

Synthetic instrument trainers, flight simulators, cockpit procedure trainers and weapons systems evaluators also were delivered to units. 

In addition, on-the-job training advisory teams 

from the Air Training Command visited about onefourth of the Air Guard bases for courses of instruction of from two to eight days. 

Annual Field Training 

ANG tactical fighter units conducted their field 

training at ANG permanent training sites. Seven 

ANG transport units participated in the year-round 

field training program, known as the "Texas Plan." 

Under that program, which acknowledges the initiation of the plan in the Lone Star State, individual 

members of a unit can spread their 15-day active 

duty tour, with the permission of the commander, 

over several periods during the year rather than 15 

consecutive days. A MATS crew, for instance, can 

take an eight-day tour for an overseas flight under 

the plan, return to their civilian pursuits, and later 

take another seven-day tour for another trip. Most 

Air Defense Command ANG units now train under 

the year-round plan, and all ANG units in MATS 

and ADC are programmed to train under this plan 

in FY 1963. During FY 1962 flight crews of all 

ANG air transport units (heavy) participated in 

overwater training flights. Air transport and aeroTypical scene at training site. 
medical transport units airlifted more than 2600 

ANG officers and airmen, plus thousands of tons of 

cargo and equipment, to and from field training sites 

during the field training period. 

Supplemental Training 

To speed up operational readiness training and 

to expedite unit conversions to new and different aircraft and related equipment, normal training programs are supplemented by additional authorized 

training. Under this project, eight days of active 

duty training was given each eligible pilot who had 

not previously had experience with the aircraft assigned to the unit. This training was accomplished 

at the unit's home station. 

Tactical Air Command provided instructor 

pilots for three F-100 squadrons to check out key 

pilots in the aircraft, and the Strategic Air Command 

made a training program available at Randolph 

AFB, Texas, for aircrews and maintenance personnel on the C/KC97 aircraft. During the year 104 

aircrew members and 25 maintenance personnel 

completed that program. 

Aircraft conversions during the year are reflected in the following table: 

-x,0 g,—dtf/ - 7op-~~. /?£ y^ 

Aircraft Conversions, FY 1962 

Former 

Aircraft 

Coining 

Command 

ADC 

ADC 

ADC 

ADC 

TAC 

TAC 

TAC 

ADC 

ADC 

MATS 

Now Unit 

Designation 

103 ATS(H) 

1 0 8 ARS 

1 4 7 AMS 

1 58 ATSIHI 

142 ATSIHI 

1 7 4 TFS 

1 8 0 ATSIH) 

1 24 FIS 

1 26 ARS 

1 4 5 ARS 

New 

Aircraft 

Gaining 

Command 

1 0 3 FIS 

1 0 8 FIS 

1 4 7 FIS 

1 58 FIS 

142 TFS 

1 7 4 TRS 

1 8 0 TRS 

1 24 FIS 

1 2 6 FIS 

145 AMS 

Philadelphia, Pa. 

Park Ridge, III. 

Coraopolis, Pa. 

Savannah, Ga . 

Wilmington, Del. 

Sioux City, Iowa 

St. Joseph, Mo. 

Des Moines, Iowa 

Milwaukee, Wise. 

Clinton AFB, Ohio 

F-89J 

F-86L 

F-86L 

F-86L 

F-86H 

RF-84F 

RF-84F 

F-86L 

F-89J 

C-l 19J 

KC-97G 

KC-97F 

C-119J 

KC-97G 

KC-97G 

F-100C 

KC-97G 

F-89J 

KC-97F 

KC-97F 

MATS 

TAC 

MATS 

MATS 

MATS 

TAC 

MATS. 

ADC 

TAC , 

TAC 

Supplemental training was offered aircrews of 

tactical fighter and fighter interceptor units as 

follows: 

• Thirteen Air Defense units made 24 deployments to the Air Defense Command Weapons 

Center, Tyndall AFB, Fla., for air-to-air missile firing. Seven units were equipped with F-89J's and 

six with F-102As. This deployment and firing is 

required for the qualification of all crews on these 

types of aircraft. Units deployed in flights of six aircraft for 4 to 6 days. Each aircraft was required to 

successfully fire one missile, firing being accomplished at target drones. All ANG fighter interceptor 

unit support personnel and equipment were airlifted 

to and from Tyndall by ANG air transport and aeromedical transport units. 

• Tactical fighter units, in order to attain and 

maintain proficiency in weapons delivery, staged 

their aircraft and aircrews at field training sites and 

Air Force bases. These exercises, usually conducted 

ANG F-lOOs on training mission 

on weekends, are for air-to-air and air-to-ground 

weapons employment and are performed according 

to the techniques and tactics developed by the Tactical Air Command. 73 
• Military Air Transport Service provided a 

training program at Charleston AFB, S.C., where 

sixteen pilots and sixteen flight engineers became 

qualified in the C-121 Constellation preparatory to 

the receipt by ANG units of the first C-121. Simulator time was provided all aircrew members. Flight 

line training was given 62 air technician maintenance personnel. 

• The Air Force Logistics Command provided 

a training program for missile maintenance personnel at Olmstead AFB, Pa. The training was given 

on the Falcon Missile, primary weapon of the F-102 

aircraft. 

School Training 

The Air National Guard continued to place personnel in the pilot and navigator training programs, 

which, in general, consist of undergraduate flying 

training and advanced flying training conducted by 

the Air Force for ANG officers and aviation cadets 

(navigators). Adequate spaces were provided in 

Air Force flying schools for advanced training of all 

ANG fighter-interceptor pilots and tactical fighter 

pilots following their graduation from basic flying 

training. Further qualification training in mission 

aircraft was conducted by the parent unit. Navigator trainees who were destined to return to a MATS 

unit were given advanced training in overwater navigation and MATS route checks by active duty MATS 

units. 

All non-prior service airmen are required, as a 

condition of enlistment, to complete USAF Basic 

Military Training. As in the past, the ANG supported three programs to achieve this goal. Each 

began with Basic Military Training and followed 

by either basic technical training and/or on-the-job 

training (OJT) for a total period of six months; immediate entry into a Basic Technical School; or OJT 

at the home station in a unit training status. 

Various familiarization courses and special training courses were also made available to Air Guardsmen. Adjustments and a decrease in some training 

areas were required during the year as a result of the 

Berlin contingency mobilization. Listed below, by 

various categories of training programs, are the number of individuals completing training during FY 

1962 and those who were in training as of 30 June 

1962. 

Ordered 

Completed lo Active In Trng 

Trng Duly as of 

During While 30 Juno 

Typo of Training FY 62 In Trng 1962 

Pilot Training 4 5 17 71 

Navigator Training 2 0 1 19 

Officer Technical Training 61 6 1 2 4 3 

Airman Technical Training (prior 

service) 63 4 1 7 11 6 

Basic Military Training with Basic 

Technical Training or OJT (Six 

months) 58 7 16 

Combined Basic Military and Technical Training 192 8 14 3 124 7 

Basic Military Training 352 5 8 0 30 3 

Total 685 6 27 7 181 5 

Operations 

Flying Hours 

During FY 1962, the ANG flew a total of 

329,142 flying hours, of which 233,568 were flown 

in jet aircraft, 63,108 in tactical support aircraft, 

and 32,466 in C-47 support aircraft. The quarterly 

number of aircraft hours flown during the year varied 

from a high rate during the first quarter to a below 

normal rate during the remaining three quarters. 

This variation was due to the intensified and accelerated training received by the thirty-one units 

alerted for recall at the first of the year, and to the 

many aircraft conversions by the remaining units. 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD FLYING HOURS - FY 1962 

NO OF BOOKS 
Air Defense Alert 

During the year, ANG squadrons, including the 

Hawaii ANG, participated in the Air Defense Alert 

Program. These squadrons provide aircraft, aircrews, and support personnel for the nation's air 

defense. During their duty tours, aircrews are on a 

5-minute alert to intercept unidentified and potentially hostile aircraft. Units engaged in these missions realize valuable training benefits while contributing directly to U. S. defense. 

Five Aircraft Control and Warning Squadrons 

continued 'round-the-clock participation in the active 

air defense network. Two, at Salt Lake City, Utah, 

and Denver, Colo., function as part of the North 

American Air Defense Command network. Three 

units continue to provide the sole radar air defense 

in Hawaii for the Pacific Air Forces. The sixth unit, 

located in Puerto Rico, also is operational eight hours 

per day, five days per week in support of flying activities. 

Flying Safety 

During FY 1962 the ANG reached a new low 

in its major aircraft accident rate of 10.86 accidents 

per 100,000 flying hours. The rates for FY 1960 and 

FY 1961 were 11.76 and 12.66 respectively. The 

reduction on the aircraft accident rate is a result 

of many factors, including a highly professional approach in the handling of aircraft by maintenance 

personnel and aircrews, runway improvement programs, aircraft arresting barrier installations, and 

construction of additional ramp areas. 

Another factor in the reduction of the aircraft 

accident rate has been the safety surveys at twentytwo of the ANG's jet operating bases by Air Guard 

survey teams. These surveys have resulted in improvements for the units in all areas assuring a safer 

operation throughout the program. 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD ACCIDENT RATE - FY 1962 

IUEIII IH.M IH« FITIK TIM 

1 

1 

AKIktl III! FN FT 12 II If 

. 1 

liil 

Pilot Categorization & Flying Status 

Pilots were redesignated in FY 1962 into 4 

categories: (1) Aircrew Jet, (2) Aircrew Non-Jet, 

(3) Operational Support, and (4) Administrative 

Support. Numerical limitations applicable to the 

first three categories are controlled through manning 

document authorizations. However, to reduce category 4 to the ceiling of 150 imposed by the Bureau 

of the Budget, quotas were established for each 

State to effect removal of excess pilots in this category from flying status. This limitation required 

transfer of excess persons to a position requiring 

flying status, if available (thus placing him in one 

of the first 3 categories), suspension from flying 

status without prejudice, or discharge from the Air 

National Guard and transfer to the Air Force Reserve. The ceiling of 150 was effective 1 July 1962. 

Action to reduce category 4 pilots within this figure 

was completed by 30 June 1962. 

During the year a total of 85 officers who were 

assigned to positions not requiring rated officers 

were suspended from flying status, including those 

suspended due to category 4 ceiling. Ten were suspended under voluntary requests for suspension, and 

12 for other reasons. 

Air Force Advisers 

As of 30 June 1962, 150 Air Force Advisers 

were assigned against an authorized 162 positions. 

Of this number, 47 officers ranging from captain 

through colonel, were nominated, accepted and assigned during the fiscal year. With the activation 

of certain ANG units, many Air Force Advisers and 

Technical Advisers remained with the unit while on 

active duty. 
GROUN D COMMUNICATION S 

During FY 1962 the ANG Communications, 

Electronics and Weather Forces continued to move 

forward toward the long range goals established by 

the Air Force: That day to day training operations 

must contribute as much as possible in support of 

the Active Establishment mission. 

The three most important objectives were: 

• Units must be organized and equipped to allow instant response to an emergency situation. 

• Peacetime training must be realistic. Units 

should be deployed and trained as nearly as possible in the same manner as required on active 

duty. 

• C-E units should be assigned "live tasks" as 

part of their peace-time training whenever possible. These tasks must be in line with the readiness training requirements and must facilitate individual, team and unit training to the greatest 

extent. 

Force Structure 

During FY 1962 the C-E force structure consisted of 76 units at 59 different locations in 31 

States, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, 

with approximately 15,000 military spaces and 

manned with highly qualified technical people. In an 

emergency situation the following commands would 

gain these forces: 

• Four Communications Groups of 25 units; 

two Mobile Communications Squadrons, of 11 units 

and one Special Communications Squadron, are assigned to Air Force Communications Service. 

• Two Tactical Control Groups of 16 units are 

assigned to Tactical Air Command. 

• Fifteen Ground Electronics Engineer Installation Agency (GEEIA) Squadrons and two Communications Maintenance Squadrons assigned to Air 

Force Logistics Command. 

• The C-E force also includes six Aircraft Control and Warning Squadrons which have operated 

fixed Air Defense type of radar sites; three in Hawaii 

in support of PACAF, two in the ZI in support of 

ADC and one in Puerto Rico in training for support 

of the Antilles Defense Force. 

Fiscal year 1962 has been our most effective 

year in training to achieve our established goals. 

During this time, the 152nd Tactical Control Group 

was mobilized and deployed to Europe. 

The Fixed AC&W Squadrons demonstrated on 

daily basis their capability to perform the Air Defense mission. Three of these Squadrons in Hawaii 

manned the Hawaiian Air Defense Radar System on 

a 7 day per week, 24 hour per day basis in support 

of the PACAF Commander. This is the only radar 

defense and warning network in the Hawaiian complex. The two AC&W Squadrons in Utah and Colorado also operated fulltime facilities in support of 

Air Defense Command, providing fulltime ground 

controlled intercept capabilities and early warning 

coverage for their areas as an added benefit to training personnel for the ADC mobilization mission. 

FY 1962 also saw a continuation of the "live 

scheme" participation by our 15 GEEIA Squadrons. 

They trained by actually installing Air Force equipment on USAF-programmed projects. During the 

last year, the ANG GEEIA Squadrons performed 

training in 23 States at 56 locations. Twenty-six 

programmed Active Establishment C-E schemes were 

completed and twenty-five others were in various 

stages of completion ranging from 75'/' to 90%. 

This gave the units training at Cape Canaveral, Vandenberg and many other important locations including support of Minuteman and Atlas sites as well as 

projects like the second Mercury shot. 

The two Air National Guard Communications 

Maintenance Squadrons are work-loaded by Air 

Force Logistics Command with reparable items of 

communications equipment for training and actual 

depot level maintenance. During the Berlin Contingency buildup, Air Force gave them a carload of 

VHF radio equipment to repair for use in Europe. 

Those sets were repaired faster than contractors 

estimated they could do the job and at a very substantial savings to USAF. 

The two Mobile Communications Squadrons 

with their nine Mobile Communications Flights, have 

a wartime mission under AFCS to provide emergency mission support through the installation and 

operation of mobile navaids, air traffic control facilities and point to point radio communications in contingency areas. The units have been providing part 

of the actual air traffic control and communications 

tasks in support of our ANG permanent field training site operations. 

The 280th Communications Squadron (Special) 

located at Maxwell Air Force Base, has continued 
in its mission to provide an additional operating capability to the minimum operating force of the 2047th 

Communications Squadron of the Regular Establishment. The 280th participated frequently during the 

past year in quick reaction type exercises with USAF. 

Significant developments occurred during the 

last year in the role that the four Air Guard Communications Groups will play in the Air Force Emergency Communications Program. 

Another, interesting development during FY 

1962 was the way some of our training dollars were 

used to support the aerospace program. The 267th 

Communications Squadron of the 253rd Communications Group located at Wellesley, Massachusetts, 

near Hanscom AFB, has been furnishing a complete 

shift of workers on Tuesday and Thursday evenings 

of each week for the Communications Center of the 

Air Force Space Track Research and Development 

Facility. 

Unique in the C-E force is the C-97 aircraft 

of the Oklahoma Air National Guard which has been 

CIVIL ENGINEERIN G 

The facilities required in the accomplishment of 

the Air National Guard mission are limited to the 

minimum requirements of the Flying Units, Training Sites, and Support Units such as Aircraft Control and Warning, communications and radio relay 

squadrons. Funds for the construction of these 

necessary facilities are authorized by Congress. On 

30 June 1962 the Air National Guard operated 92 

flying bases and 43 non-flying installations, strategically located throughout the United States, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. 

equipped with a communications capability to be an 

air-borne or ground operated command and control 

center. This command communications facility is 

manned by airmen serving in communications units 

of the Oklahoma ANG. During FY 1962, this aircraft, known as the C-97 "Talking Bird," was deployed on four separate missions supporting the Air 

Force. The facility is maintained on a four hour 

alert status and was deployed by the USAF Command 

Post to Adana, Turkey in September 1961, supporting Tactical Air Command's Operation "Checkmate." In October 1961, the aircraft took station 

in Iceland in support of TAC's Operation "Stair 

Step," involving the movement of activated ANG 

units to Europe. The third mission was flown to 

South America in November, supporting the Thunder 

Bird demonstration team and a goodwill trip of the 

President. The latest deployment was in June to 

Mexico City in support of a Presidential visit. 

A total of 31 Air National Guard flying units 

and 14 support units were mobilized during this 

fiscal year. This mobilization of ANG units emphasized the need for messing and dormitory facilities at all ANG Bases. Without these facilities it 

was very difficult to effectively support the units at 

home station. Starting with the FY 1964 Construction Program, an attempt will be made to provide 

these facilities at each base. 

Typical ANG Base 
Construction 

The FY 1962 Construction Program supported 

the continued modification and expansion of the 

ANG base structure to keep pace with more modern 

jet aircraft and changing missions. The FY 1962 

Military Construction Program, amounting to $28,-

232,812, included funds for the following: new 

obligation authorization, $18,275,000; carry-over 

to complete prior year requirements, $7,457,812; 

and appropriation transfer $2,500,000. Against this 

amount ANG obligated an estimated $19,633,000. 

New construction included 12 runway extensions, 

including taxiways, overruns and rehabilitation; four 

maintenance docks; two maintenance shops; one fire 

station; three warehouse base supply and equipment 

buildings; one fuel and utilities system and one water 

supply storage system. 

The Minor Construction Program was increased 

by $200,000 to a new total of $700,000. Minor 

construction projects such as engine build-up shops, 

dispensaries, communication and operations buildings, paint, oil and dope storage facilities, motor vehicle shops, alert hangars and obstruction lights at 

various ANG locations were accomplished under this 

authority. 

Major Repair and Modification 

Major repair and modification projects were 

authorized in the amount of $5,240,000. Included 

were projects to promote more efficient methods of 

operation and the modernization of aging facilities. 

Maintenance and Operations 

The maintenance of facilities and the operation 

of utilities systems at ANG bases were accomplished 

by service contracts and agreements between the 

Federal government and the various States, Puerto 

Rico and the District of Columbia. Under the terms 

of these contracts and agreements, the Federal government defrayed 75% of the actual cost, except 

for the entire funding of permanent field training 

sites. Federal funds in the amount of $8,556,812 

were expended in Fiscal Year 1962 for maintaining 

and operating Air National Guard installations. 

TIC S 

Aircraft Inventory 

On 1 July 1961, there were 2,039 aircraft assigned to 92 Air National Guard units as compared 

to 1,263 on 30 June 1962. This sharp decrease of 

776 aircraft was primarily due to the mobilization 

of 31 units with 702 aircraft during October and 

November 196!. The other 74 planes were withdrawn when seven fighter aircraft units converted 

to cargo-type aircraft. Fighter units are authorized 

25 aircraft while cargo-type units are authorized only 

eight planes per unit. 

During the last six months of the fiscal year, 

additional KC-97F aircraft became available from 

USAF and were assigned to Chicago, Marietta, Nashville, Memphis, Salt Lake City and Oklahoma City 

—bringing the total to eight aircraft per unit. Also 

a sufficient number of planes were allocated to convert and assign a total of six aircraft to each of the 

units located at Milwaukee, Clinton County, Savannah, New Castle, Philadelphia and St. Joseph. 

In May 1962, USAF made available two C121C aircraft to the ANG—the first ever assigned 
AIRCRAFT IN USE BY THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

RF-84F F-84F F-89 

F-102 F-100 KC-97 

F-86L RB-57 SA-16 

C-97 C-121 C-119 

F-86H C-123 F-104 
^p1 

80 
THE MISSISSIPPI RIFLES 

BUENA VISTA, MEXICO, FEBRUARY 23, 1847. 

Fighting in the open on a dusty mountainside in 

a foreign land a thousand miles from home, 

facing an enemy many times its own strength, 

the Mississippi Rifles, commanded hy Colonel 

Jefferson Davis, displayed a rock-like defense 

against a Mexican attack in response to the 

command, "Stand Fast Mississippians!" Earlier, 

the battle had reached a critical stage when the 

Rifles (in the action depicted) were ordered to 

attack Mexican cavalry and infantry advancing 

on the Americans. The "hard-fighting Mississippi 

gentlemen" moved up, fired, then drew Bowie 

knives and closed in. The Rifles—the 155th 

Infantry of the modern Mississippi Army National Guard—thus wrote another chapter in 

the proud National Guard tradition. 
to the Guard. These aircraft were assigned to the 

156th Aeromedical Squadron, Charlotte, N.C., and 

to the 183rd Aeromedical Squadron, Jackson, Miss. 

Maintenance 

During FY 1962, 38 C-47s were cycled through 

Hayes International Corporation, Hondo, Texas, 

for Minimum Essential Depot Level Maintenance 

(MEDLM). This work consisted of a thorough inspection, corrosion control measures, and necessary 

repairs and modifications. 

In addition, the discovery of a wing deficiency 

in the C-47 brought about the establishment of an 

inspection and repair program for 46 C47s by Lear 

at Sky Harbor Airport, Phoenix, Ariz. 

At the ANG base in Savannah, Ga., a repair 

line was started to recondition and bring up-to-date 

Quick Engine Change Kits (QEC) necessary to the 

maintenance of the C/KC-97 aircraft. 

C rew I ransport I ruck 

Engine Buildup Shop 
Vehicles 

The ANG received 100 new 5,000-gallon truckmounted refuelers during the past fiscal year, helping to modernize its truck fleet by greatly increasing refueling capability while reducing the total 

quantity of refuelers on hand. 

Another introduction to the vehicle fleet was the 

new multi-stop delivery truck, used to move pilots 

from alert rooms to aircraft on the flight line. 

Supply and Services 

Prior to the Berlin Mobilization, in accordance 

with NGB policies, Air National Guard units were 

equipped primarily for training missions. The mobilization revealed that this equipment was not adequate to support combat missions and that attempts 

to acquire the necessary additional equipment after 

mobilization raised some problems. Several actions 

have been taken to remedy this situation. To further help any mobilization action, the United States 

Property and Fiscal Officer (USP&FO) or his 

assistant in each State will now be assigned to the 

State Staff. This will permit the USP&FOs in future 

mobilizations to assist State commanders with their 

requirements. It will also provide for the continued 

operation of ANG Base Supply Accounts during 

mobilization. 

During this fiscal year, 14 of these Air Guard 

Base Supply Accounts have been mechanized with 

an Electrical Accounting Machine system which ties 

them directly into the Air Force mechanized system. 

This puts Air Guard Base Supply accounting on a 

faster and more efficient footing and brings it into 

conformity with the Air Force. The remaining States 

are scheduled for mechanization in FY 1963. 

To bring the Air National Guard in further 

conformity with the rest of the Armed Forces, the 

An R-2 Refueling Truck 

Air Guard began implementation of Department of 

Defense Military Standard Requisitioning and Issue 

Procedures (MILSTRIP) on 15 February 1962, 

completing the action at the end of the fiscal year. 

This is in line with DOD unification policy among 

branches of the military for greater efficiency through 

a standardardization of procedures. 

Approximately 200 Air Guard officers and airmen were trained in MILSTRIP by attending an 

orientation course offered by Air Force Logistics 

Command. 

Primary Supply Points are being established at 

Van Nuys, Calif, and Wilmington, Del., to support 

Air Guard C-97 aircraft which make regular overseas flights for the Military Air Transport Service 

as a part of their training. These Supply Points will 

try to prevent delay in the flights by prepositioning 

spare parts at selected locations overseas to be used 

by the Air Guard planes when needed. These parts 

and Supply Points will, of course, be useful in the 

event of mobilization. The Supply Points were 

scheduled to be in operation by 1 September 1962. 

Programs and Requirements 

To further insure a smoother transition to federal status in any future mobilization, a study was 

made in FY 1962 of the ANG system of authorization and inventory reporting of organizational equipment. A decision was made to adopt the Air Force 

method of authorizing equipment under the Air Force 

Unit Authorization List (UAL) system. 

A program was also developed to bring the Air 

Guard into conformity with Air Force methods of 

keeping inventory. Plans were made to implement 

the new Air Force Equipment Management System 

which is scheduled for the Air Force in August 1962. 

Air Guard units are scheduled to start conversion to the new system in December 1962. The program includes abolishment of the ANG Equipment 

Allowance List (ANGEAL) and the application of 

Air Force equipment allowance documents. 

In support of the program, the Air Materiel 

Areas and depots are developing plans to amend and 

code Air Force allowance documents to reflect items 

or quantities necessary for supporting the ANG. 

In addition, in May 1962, gaining commands 

furnished the federalized Air Guard units and the 

Bureau with a card file listing of the equipment authorized the active duty units. That step was designed to facilitate continued reporting of inventory 

changes following the unit's demobilization. 
APPENDI X A 

CHIEF OF: 

DIVISION OF MILITIA AFFAIRS 1908-1916 

MILITIA BUREAU 1916-1933 

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 1933-

Col. Erasmus M. Weaver 1908-1911 

Brig. Gen. Robert K. Evans 1911-1912 

Maj. Gen. Albert L. Mills 1912-1916 

Maj. Gen. William A. Mann 1916-1917 

Maj. Gen. Jessie Mel. Carter 1917-1918 

Brig. Gen. John W. Heavey (Acting) 1918-1919 

Maj. Gen. Jessie Mel. Carter 1919-1921 

Maj. Gen. George C. Rickards 1921-1925 

Maj. Gen. Creed C. Hammond 1925-1929 

Col. Ernest R. Redmond (Acting) 1929-1929 

Maj. Gen. William G. Everson 1929-1931 

Maj. Gen. George E. Leach 1931-1935 

Col. Herold J. Weiler (Acting) 1935-1936 

Col. 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Maj 

Mai 

John 

Gen. 

Gen. 

Gen. 

Gen. 

Gen. 

Gen. 

Gen. 

Gen. 

Gen. 

Gen. 

Gen. 

F. Williams (Acting) 

Albert H. Blanding 

John F. Williams 

John F. Williams (Acting) 

Butler B. Miltonberger 

Kenneth F. Cramer 

Raymond H. Fleming (Acting) 

Raymond H. Fleming 

Earl T. Ricks (Acting) 

Edgar C. Erickson 

Winston P. Wilson (Acting) 

Donald W. McGowan 

1936-1936 

1936-1940 

1940-1944 

1944-1946 

1946-1947 

1947-1950 

1950-1951 

1951-1953 

1953-1953 

1953-1959 

1959-1959 

1959-
APPENDI X B 

STATE ADJUTANTS GENERAL 

30 June 1962 

Alabama Maj. Gen. Henry V. Graham 

Alaska Maj. Gen. Thomas P. Carroll 

Arizona Maj. Gen. John C. Wilson 

Arkansas Maj. Gen. Sherman T. Clinger 

California Maj. Gen. Roderic L. Hill 

Colorado Maj. Gen. Joe C. Moffitt 

Connecticut Maj. Gen. Frederick G. Reincke 

Delaware Maj. Gen. Joseph J. Scanncll 

District of Columbia 

Maj. Gen. William H. Abendroth (CG) 

Florida Maj. Gen. Henry W. McMillan 

Georgia Maj. Gen. George J. Hearn 

Hawaii Maj. Gen. Fred W. Makinney 

Idaho , Maj. Gen. John E. Walsh 

Illinois Maj. Gen. Leo M. Boyle 

Indiana Maj. Gen. John S. Anderson 

Iowa Maj. Gen. Junior F. Miller 

Kansas Maj. Gen. Joe Nickell 

Kentucky Maj. Gen. Arthur Y. Lloyd 

Louisiana Maj. Gen. Raymond H. Fleming 

Maine Maj. Gen. E. W. Heywood 

Maryland Lt. Gen. Milton A. Reckord 

Massachusetts Maj. Gen. Thos. J. Donnelly 

Michigan Maj. Gen. Ronald D. McDonald 

Minnesota Brig. Gen. Chester J. Moeglein 

Mississippi Maj. Gen. William P. Wilson 

Missouri Maj. Gen. Albert D. Sheppard 

Montana Maj. Gen. Spencer H. Mitchell 

Nebraska Maj. Gen. Lyle A. Welch 

Nevada Maj. Gen. James A. May 

New Hampshire Maj. Gen. Francis B. McSwiney 

New Jersey Maj. Gen. James F. Cantwell (CofS) 

New Mexico Maj. Gen. John P. JollyNew York Maj. Gen. A. C. O'Hara (CofS) 

North Carolina Maj. Gen. Claude T. Bowers 

North Dakota Maj. Gen. Heber L. Edwards 

Ohio Maj. Gen. Loren G. Windom 

Oklahoma Maj. Gen. Roy W. Kenny 

Oregon Maj. Gen. Paul L. Kliever 

Pennsylvania Maj. Gen. Hay Malcolm 

Puerto Rico Maj. Gen. Juan Cesar Cordero 

Rhode Island Maj. Gen. Leonard Holland 

South Carolina Maj. Gen. Frank D. Pinckney 

South Dakota Maj. Gen. Homer E. Jensen 

Tennessee Maj. Gen. Van D. Nunally, Jr. 

Texas Maj. Gen. Thomas S. Bishop 

Utah Maj. Gen. Maxwell E. Rich 

Vermont Maj. Gen. F. W. Billado 

Virginia Maj. Gen. Paul M, Booth 

Washington Maj. Gen. George M. Haskett 

West Virginia Brig. Gen. Gene H. Williams 

Wisconsin Maj. Gen. Ralph J. Olson 

Wyoming Maj. Gen. George O. Pearson 

Illinois Col. Gerald B. Lahey 

Indiana Col. Norwood R. Hughes 

Iowa Lt. Col. Russell E. Law 

Kansas Major Edwin J. Pease 

Kentucky Major Willis R. Hodges 

Louisiana Lt. Col. Joseph A. Holliday 

Maine Col. Theodore E. Lewin 

Maryland Lt. Col. Irvin E. Ebaugh 

Massachusetts Col. John F. Kane 

Michigan Col. Jay I. Nowlen 

Minnesota Lt. Col. Dean K. Torney 

Mississippi Col. Sherman B. Anderson 

Missouri Lt. Col. Jas. J. Mayes 

Montana Major Harry W. Thode 

Nebraska Major Harry A. Dahlgren 

Nevada Major Earl A. Edmunds 

New Hampshire Lt. Col. Arthur F. Hanson 

New Jersey Col. Frank E. Hanlon 

New Mexico Lt. Col. Robert H. Moser 

New York Lt. Col. Kenneth L. Buscher 

APPENDI X C 

U.S. PROPERTY AND FISCAL OFFICERS 

30 June 1962 

Alabama Col. Herman A. Price, Jr. 

Alaska Col. Charles W. Casper 

Arizona Lt. Col. John G. Smith, Jr. 

Arkansas Col. Alton F. Balkman 

California Lt. Col. Connie M. Hobbs 

Colorado Lt. Col. Harold A. Stahl 

Connecticut Col. Edward D. Walsh 

Delaware Lt. Col. Geo. I. Sylvester, Jr. 

District of Columbia Lt. Col. F. F. Bernsdorff 

Florida Col. Julian F. Pfaff 

Georgia Lt. Col. C. S. Thompson, Jr. 

Hawaii Col. Clark G. Johnson 

Idaho Col. Carl L. Isenberg 
North Carolina Col. Thomas B. Longest 

North Dakota Lt. Col. Leroy A. Landom 

Ohio Col. Raymond Strasburger 

Oklahoma Col. Ross H. Routh 

Oregon Lt. Col. William H. Adams 

Pennsylvania Lt. Col. Clair J. Stouffer 

Puerto Rico Lt. Col. Tulio L. Diaz-Ramirez 

Rhode Island Lt. Col. John C. Wall 

South Carolina Col. James C. Dozier 

South Dakota Lt. Col. C. J. Schieferstein 

APPENDI X D 

OFFICERS DETAILED TO DUTY IN 

THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 

30 June 1962 

McGowan, Donald W., Maj. Gen., ARNGUS, Chief, 

NGB. 

Wilson, Winston P., Maj. Gen., ANGUS, Deputy 

Chief, NGB. 

Terrill, Robert S., Col., ANGUS, Executive, NGB. 

Ross, Fred L., Lt. Col., Arty., USA, Assistant Executive, NGB. 

Ator, Lloyd G., Col., Armor, ARNGUS, Chief, 

Office of Policy and Liaison. 

Elliott, James C, Maj., ANGUS, Assistant Chief, 

Office of Public Affairs. 

Oldham, Charles B., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Administrative Office. 

Triplett, Ellsworth C, Lt. Col., ANGUS, Assistant 

Legal Adviser. 

Office of the Assistant Chief, NGB, for Army 

National Guard. 

Kerr, Clayton P., Maj. Gen., ARNGUS, Assistant 

Chief, NGB, Army. 

Greenlief, Francis S., Col., Inf., ARNGUS, Executive. 

Wolff, Edward L., Lt. Col., Arty., USAR, Assistant 

Executive. 

Ahee, Joe, Col., Armor, USA, Chief, Organization 

and Training Division. 

Andrews, George H., Col. AGC USA, Chief, Personnel Division. 

Bailey, James, Maj., Inf., USA, Organization, Mobilization and Army Advisers Branch, Organization 

86 and Training Division. 

Tennessee Lt. Col. M. A. Marshall 

Texas Col. Carl F. Schupp, II 

Utah Lt. Col. Joe E. Whitesides 

Vermont Lt. Col. Frank S. Isham 

Virginia Lt. Col. Harold S. Price 

Washington Lt. Col. Albert G. Hagen 

West Virginia Col. Othal V. Knipp 

Wisconsin Col. Malvin P. Wang 

Wyoming Major Henry W. Lloyd 

Brockway, Ronald S., Lt. Col., CE, USAR, Acting 

Chief, Installations Division. 

Brooks, Lawrence P., Maj., Arty., USA, Chief, Air 

Defense Branch, Organization and Training 

Division. 

Budai, Alex J., Lt. Col., Inf., ARNGUS, Chief, Officers Branch, Personnel Division 

Dunn, Thomas M., Jr., Maj., TC, USA, Maintenance 

and Services Branch, Logistics Division. 

Eitt, Herbert E., Col., Inf., USA, Chief, Logistics 

Division. 

Foist, Morris E., Lt. Col., Arty., ARNGUS, Chief, 

Control Branch, Installations Division 

Hallinger, Earl S., Jr., Col., MC, USA, Army Surgeon. 

Heske, Richard F., Lt. Col., Inf., USA, Chief, Training Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Holter, Howard H., Maj., MSC, ARNGUS, Supply 

and Accounting Branch, Logistics Division. 

Hunt, Alexander H., Maj., Inf., USA, Training 

Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Kelly, George P., Lt. Col., Arty., USA, Army Aviation Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

King, Henry J., Capt., FC, USA, Chief, Finance and 

Accounting Branch, Comptroller Division. 

McGuire, William A., Lt. Col., SigC, ARNGUS, 

Supply and Accounting Branch, Logistics Division. 

Meidling, George A., Col., CE, USA, Chief, Installations Division. 

Messinger, Carl, Maj. Ord., USAR, Chief, Maintenance and Services Branch, Logistics Division. 

Novy, James F., Lt. Col., AGC, USA, Chief, Enlisted Branch, Personnel Division. 

Orlob, August L., Maj., Arty., ARNGUS, Training 

Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Pederson, Moritz E., Lt. Col., Arty., ARNGUS, 

NGB Liaison Officer, USARADCOM, Colorado 

Springs, Colorado. 
Raff, Edward G., Lt. Col., Arty., USA, Chief, Army 

Aviation Branch, Organization and Training 

Division. 

Roughsedge, Walter L., Lt. Col., QMC, ARNGUS, 

Deputy Chief, Logistics Division. 

Shelden, Robert E. H., Lt. Col., CE, ARNGUS, 

Engineering and Construction Branch, Installations Division. 

Sibley, James E., Lt. Col., Inf., ARNGUS, Chief, 

Supply and Accounting Branch, Logistics Division. 

Walton, Charles F., Lt. Col., AGC, USAR, Officers 

Branch, Personnel Division. 

Ward, Richard H., Jr., Lt. Col., Inf., USA, Chief, 

Organization, Mobilization and Army Advisers 

Branch, Organization and Training Division. 

Wells, Ray D., Jr., Lt. Col., Arty., ARNGUS, NGB 

Liaison Officer, USARADCEN, Fort Bliss, 

Texas. 

Winfield, Floyd A., Maj., Arty., ARNGUS, Organization, Mobilization and Army Advisers Branch, 

Organization and Training Division. 

Wingate, Clifton B., Lt. Col., Inf., ARNGUS, Chief, 

Army Technician Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Underwood, Clarence R., Col., FC, USA, Chief, 

Comptroller Division. 

Office of the Assistant Chief, NGB, for Air National 

Guard. 

Wilson, Winston P., Maj. Gen., ANGUS, Assistant 

Chief, NGB, Air. 

Lichty, Benjamin W., Col., ANGUS, Executive. 

Crider, Edward O., Lt. Col., AFRes, Assistant Executive. 

Autrey, Marius M., Lt. Col., AFRes, Plans and Programs Branch, Operations and Training Division. • 

Avery, Bobby R., Capt., USAF, CommunicationElectronic and Weather Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Bell, Buron G., Maj., ANGUS, Plans and Programs 

Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Carigan, William E., Jr., Lt. Col., AFRes, Supply 

and Services Branch, Systems and Logistics 

Division. 

Clark, Dennis J., Lt. Col., USAF, Current Operations and Training Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Cooper, Peter G., Maj., ANGUS, Supply and Services Branch, Systems and Logistics Division. 

Crockett, Woodrow W., Lt. Col., USAF, Plans and 

Programs Branch, Operations and Training 

Division. 

Davis, Silas E., Jr., Maj., ANGUS, Chief, Personnel 

Training Branch, Personnel Division. 

Davis, Thomas P., Maj., AFRes, Maintenance Engineering Branch, Systems and Logistics Division. 

Day, Joseph D., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Maintenance 

Engineering Branch, Systems and Logistics 

Division. 

Deneke, William L., Maj., ANGUS, Chief, Maintenance and Operations Branch, Civil Engineering Division, 

Durgin, Allen C, Maj., USAF, Manpower and Organization Branch, Operations and Training 

Division. 

Eberle, Ralph P., Maj., ANGUS, CommunicationElectronics and Weather Branch, Operations 

and Training Division. 

Everett, Patrick C, Lt. Col., ANGUS, Current Operations and Training Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Faris, Thomas B., Lt. Col., AFRes, Deputy Chief, 

Personnel Division. 

Goode, John W., Capt., ANGUS, Chief, Air Technicians Branch, Personnel Division. 

Goodnight, Elmer K., Maj., USAF, Accounting and 

Finance Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Greene, Harold C, Maj., AFRes, CommunicationElectronics and Weather Branch, Operations 

and Training Division. 

Hensley, Gaston M., Lt. Col., USAF, Current Operations and Training Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Hogg, Roy B., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Management 

Analysis and Statistical Services Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Hook, Fred G., Jr., Col., USAF, Chief, Operations 

and Training Division. 

Hughes, Arthur G., Jr., Maj., ANGUS, Chief, Rated 

Personnel and Special Activities Branch, Personnel Division. 

Jenks, Harford P., Col., USAF, Chief, Plans and 

Programs Branch, Operations and Training 

Division. 

Keen, Clay O., Lt. Col., ANGUS, Current Operations and Training Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Konin, David H., Col., USAF, Chief, Communication-Electronics and Weather Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Lakin, Robert K., Lt. Co., USAF, Chief, Programs 

and Real Property Branch, Civil Engineering 

Division. 
McMore, Harold M., Col., AFRes, Chief, Civil Engineering Division. 

McMorries, George D., Maj., ANGUS, Current 

Operations and Training Branch, Operations 

and Training Division. 

MacPherson, Stephen J., Maj., USAF, Accounting 

and Finance Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Malnassy, Emest, Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Supply 

and Services Branch, Systems and Logistics 

Division. 

Martini, Joseph A., Capt., USAF, Chief, Records, 

Management Classification and Airmen Branch, 

Personnel Division. 

Meis, Joe F., Col., ANGUS, Chief, Comptroller 

Division. 

Metcalf, Curtis N., Lt. Col., USAF, Current Operations and Training Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Miller, Glenn A., Maj., ANGUS, Current Operations and Training Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Oberschmid, Robert E., Maj., USAF, Maintenance 

Engineering Branch, Systems and Logistics 

Division. 

Paulk, James W., Jr., Lt. Col., AFRes, Chief, Programs and Requirements Branch, Systems and 

Logistics Division. 

Pease, Phillip P., Col., AFRes, Air Surgeon. 

APPENDI X E 

TROPHIES AND AWARDS 

Army National Guard 

NATIONAL GUARD ASSOCIATION 

TROPHY, PERSHING TROPHY AND 

NATIONAL GUARD (STATE) TROPHY. These 

awards are given as a result of competition among 

Army National Guard units in prescribed qualification firing of specific individual weapons. The National Guard Association Trophy is awarded annually to the unit attaining the highest figure of merit 

of all competing teams. The Pershing Trophy is 

awarded annually to the unit attaining the highest 

figure of merit in each Army Area. The National 

Guard State Trophy is awarded annually to the unit 

attaining the highest figure of merit in each State. 

In 1961, units from 39 States entered this competition. 

NATIONA L RIFL E ASSOCIATION 

TROPHY. This bronze plaque is awarded annually 

Pizzo, Philip J., Maj., ANGUS, Engineering Branch. 

Civil Engineering Division. 

Ries, Raymond P., Maj., ANGUS, Chief, Federal 

Recognition and Officers Register Branch, Personnel Division. 

Ringley, Howard D., Maj., USAF, CommunicationElectronics and Weather Branch, Operations 

and Training Division. 

Ritter, Newton S., Col., AFRes, Office of the Air 

Surgeon. 

Rowland, Clifton A., Maj., ANGUS, Chief, Budget 

Branch, Comptroller Division. 

Sims, Ardath M., Maj., ANGUS, Maintenance Engineering Branch, Systems and Logistics Division. 

Sussky, Ira M., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, Current Operations and Training Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Tipsword, William H., Maj., ANGUS, Office of the 

Executive. 

Tucker, Albert S. J., Jr., Lt. Col., USAF, Chief, 

Manpower and Organizations Branch, Operations and Training Division. 

Waller, Robert D., Maj., ANGUS, Current Operations and Training Branch, Operations and 

Training Division. 

Wibom, Francis C, Lt. Col., AFRes, Chief, Accounting and Finance Branch, Comptroller Division. 

to the Army Guard unit team which attains the highest score among all States in .22 caliber rifle "postal" 

matches. The purpose of this competition is to encourage the formation of competitive matches among 

leagues formed in each State, with the winning team 

in each league being eligible to shoot for the National 

Rifle Association Trophy. In 1962, the trophy was 

won by Company A, 128th Engineer Battalion, 

Nebraska Army National Guard. 

CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD 

BUREAU TROPHY. Competition for this award is 

carried out in three indoor .22 caliber rifle matches 

conducted by the National Rifle Association for the 

National Guard Bureau. The matches consist of a 

unit team match, a battalion or equivalent team 

match, and an individual match. The winning unit 

team receives the trophy plaque, which is passed on 

annually to subsequent winners. The names of winning units are permanently inscribed on the plaque. 

The complete list of winners is published in NGB 

Pamphlet 44-4. 
MILITARY POLICE TEAM PISTOL 

TROPHY. Competition for this award is a .45 

caliber pistol match, sponsored by the Military Police 

Association. Entries are restricted to Military Police 

units of the Army National Guard. The trophy, a 

plaque with a crossed-pistol design, is permanently 

displayed in the Military Police Corps Museum at 

Fort Gordon, Georgia, and a replica is furnished 

the winning team each year for permanent retention. 

The winning team in 1961 was the 120th Military 

Police Company, Hawaii Army National Guard, 

which was also the winner the past two years. The 

highest-scoring individual is also awarded a trophy 

bearing the figure of a Military Policeman in shooting 

position. The individual winner in 1961 was MSgt 

Matildo M. Paz of the 120th Military Police Company. The complete list of winners is published in 

NGB Pamphlet 44-5. 

EISENHOWER TROPHY. This trophy, named 

in honor of General of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower, is a bronze Cup permanently on display in the 

National Guard Association Memorial in Washington, D.C. Identical cups are awarded each year to 

an outstanding company-size unit in each State, the 

District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The trophies 

are rotated annually within each State, with the 

winners given replicas for permanent retention. 

Names of winning units are also inscribed on a parchment folio in the National Guard Association Memorial. The complete list of winners was published 

in NGB Pamphlet 44-6. 

UNITED STATES ARMY AIR DEFENSE 

COMMANDER'S TROPHY. This trophy is 

awarded each December to the outstanding Army 

National Guard on-site missile battalion. The winner 

is determined on the basis of ratings achieved by 

the various battalions in operational readiness inspections, command maintenance inspections, annual 

service practice scores, and Annual General Inspections. In FY 1961, the third annual trophy was won 

by the 4th Missile Battalion, 251st Artillery, California Army National Guard, in competition among 

elements of 32 eligible combat-ready Army National 

Guard battalions in 14 States. The award consists 

of a cup which is passed on to each annual winning 

battery, and a plaque for permanent possession. 

ERICKSON TROPHY. This trophy is named 

for Major General Edgar C. Erickson (Ret.), who 

served as Chief of the National Guard Bureau from 

1953 to 1959. It is awarded annually to the Distinguished Graduate of each of the Office Candidate 

courses conducted at the U.S. Army Infantry School 

and the U.S. Army Artillery and Missile School, as 

well as the Distinguished Graduate of each of the 

State Officer Candidate Schools. The original Erickson Trophy, a replica of the "Sons of Liberty" bowl 

made by Paul Revere, is permanently displayed in 

the Milton A. Record Lounge of the National Guard 

Association Memorial. Each Distinguished Graduate 

receives a smaller facsimile of the trophy. Additionally, the names of the recipients are permanently 

recorded on parchment displayed with the original 

trophy. 

ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES 

ARMY AWARD. This award consists of a plaque 

awarded to the graduate of each State Officer Candidate School who demonstrates the highest standards 

of leadership while participating in the program. 

Leadership criteria for this award is established by 

each school. The plaques are provided by the Association of the United States Army. 

Air National Guard 

SPAATZ TROPHY. This trophy, named for 

General Carl Spaatz, former Chief of Staff of the 

United States Air Force, is awarded each year to 

the most outstanding Air National Guard tactical 

flying unit. It remains in the permanent possession 

of the winning unit. Units are judged on the basis 

of their tactical, technical, administrative and logistical efficiency. The trophy is a large silver globe, 

surmounted by a modernistic aircraft and mounted 

on a silver base. The second-highest scoring unit 

receives an engraved silver and mahogany plaque. 

An engraved bronze plaque is awarded to the third 

place winner. In FY 62, the first place winner was 

the 104th Tactical Fighter Squadron of Maryland; 

the second place winner was the 155th Fighter 

Group (AD) of Nebraska; and the third place winner was the 117th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron 

of Kansas. 

WINSTON P. WILSON TROPHY. This trophy 

is named for Major General Winston P. Wilson, the 

Deputy Chief, National Guard Bureau, and Assistant 

Chief, National Guard Bureau for Air National 

Guard. The trophy is a large silver urn, surmounted 

by an American Eagle and engraved with the inscription: "The Winston P. Wilson Trophy awarded 

for year-round excellence in the performance of the 

ANG Ail-Weather Defense Mission." This year the 

trophy was awarded to the 155th Fighter Group 

(AD), Lincoln, Nebraska. 

AIR FORCE ASSOCIATION OUTSTANDING UNIT TROPHY. This trophy is awarded yearly 

on a rotating basis to the outstanding Air Guard Tac-
tical Flying Unit. The trophy is a large silver bowl 

upon which is engraved the name of each winning 

unit. This year's winner was the 104th Tactical 

Fighter Squadron, Baltimore, Maryland. 

NATIONAL GUARD ASSOCIATION 

TROPHY (AIR). This trophy, presented for the 

first time in FY 1960, is awarded each year to units 

judged most operationally ready in each major aircraft grouping. The criteria used are aircrew readiness, readiness of other than aircrew personnel, 

operational readiness of aircraft, accident rates and 

flying safety programs. Winning units were the 

following: 

Unit 

194th Fighter Interceptor Sq. 

1 34th Fighter Interceptor Sq. 

188th Fighter Interceptor Sq. 

199th Fighter Interceptor Sq. 

1 54th Tactical Recon Sq. 

143rd Troop Carrier Sq. 

185th Air Transport Sq. 

183rd Aeromed Transport Sq. Hawkins Field, Miss. 

AIR FORCE ASSOCIATION OUTSTANDING AIRMAN AWARD. This award, an engraved 

bronze plaque, is presented each year to the most 

outstanding Air National Guard airman, and remains 

in his permanent possession. The winner for FY 

1962 was Senior Master Sergeant Thomas W. Linam, 

140th Tactical Fighter Wing, Colorado. 

EARL T. RICKS MEMORIAL TROPHY. 

Named for Major General Earl T. Ricks, former 

Deputy Chief of the National Guard Bureau and 

Chief of the Air Force Division, this trophy is 

awarded by the Air Force Association to an Air 

National Guard pilot or crew in competition which 

emphasizes flight planning, cruise control, tactical 

proficiency, and capability to successfully complete 

an operational mission. The trophy, shown in text, 

is a large silver replica of the Washington MonuLocation 

Fresno, California 

Burlington, Vermont 

Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 

Hickam AFB, Hawaii 

Adams Field, Arkansas 

Green MAP, Rhode Island 

Will Rogers A/P , Okla. 

Aircraft 

F-86 

F-89 

F-10 0 

F-10 2 

RB-57 

SA-1 6 

C-9 7 

C - l 19 

ment, surmounted by a bronze jet airplane and 

mounted on a silver base. Speed was not a factor 

in this year's Ricks Event in which six Air Guard 

C-97 crews competed in a MATS cargo-carrying 

mission from Travis AFB, California, 11 September 

1961, to Tachikawa Air Base, Japan, and return, 

with a final leg to Philadelphia, 20 September 1961, 

site of AFA's 1961 convention. The distance flown 

by the two finalist crews totaled 17,000 miles in 65 

hours of flying, for an average of more than 250 

miles per hour. The California Air National 

Guard's 195th Air Transport Squadron won the 

Ricks Trophy with a total of 23,215 points out of 

a possible 30,000. The aircraft commander of the 

winning aircrew was Captain Robert Reardon, 195th 

Air Transport Squadron, Van Nuys, California. 

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE FLYING 

SAFETY PLAQUE. This award is a mahogany 

plaque with detail in bronze and has a medallion 

mounted on velvet in a chrome frame. The plaque 

medallion bears the legend: "For Meritorious 

Achievement in Flight Safety." The name of the 

selected organization and the inclusive dates of the 

award period are engraved on the plaque. These 

plaques were first awarded in 1950. Air National 

Guard recipients for this highest and most coveted 

USAF peacetime safety award for Calendar Year 

1961 were the 127th Tactical Fighter Squadron, 

Wichita, Kansas; and the 147th Fighter Interceptor 

Squadron, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The former has 

flown over 20,000 accident free hours prior to and 

during the calendar year 1961 and is equipped with 

F-100 "Super Sabre" jet fighter aircraft. The latter 

is equipped with F-102 "Delta Dagger" all weather 

interceptor jets and has been accident free during 

the reporting period while converting from older and 

slower type aircraft. 

APPENDI X F 

REVISIONS, CHANGES AND 

NEW REGULATIONS 

PUBLISHED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1962 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

NGR 2-2 (Military Publications) was changed 

to provide: (1) Exceptions for the preparation and 

submission of the DA Form 12 series. Those requisitions for publications pertaining to Aircraft Atomic 

Weapons, or Missile and Rocket literature will be 

submitted through the Chief, National Guard Bureau, 

to the Publications Center having single-manager 

responsibility in lieu, of the center normally servicing 

the area; (2) That all on-site missile units and such 

other units as may be designated by the Chief, National Guard Bureau, will procure and maintain 

blank forms and publications necessary for mobilization. 

NGB Pain 2-1-1 (Publications—National Guard 

Bureau) was revised to list current National Guard 

Bureau publications and to provide an alphabetical 
index of subjects covered by National Guard Regulations and National Guard Bureau Pamphlets. This 

pamphlet also contains a list of all regulations and 

pamphlets rescinded or superseded in the past year. 

NGR 3 (Records Administration). The requirement for the submission of the report on Records 

Holdings was changed to provide for preparation 

every two years and submission of the first report 

by 31 May 1962. This report will contain data reflecting the volume of files on hand as of that date. 

Personnel 

NGR 20-2 (Commissioned Officers) was 

changed to prescribe a more rigid qualification criteria for Federal recognition of State Adjutants 

General. Officers or former officers below the grade 

of colonel who are appointed as adjutants general 

are required to be fully qualified, to include time in 

grade, and a military educational qualification before 

they are extended Federal recognition and promoted 

in the Reserve to a "higher grade. Officers or former 

officers who have served a minimum of two years in 

the grade of colonel and above who are appointed 

as adjutants general, if fully qualified, may be extended Federal recognition and promoted in the reserve to the grade of brigadier general or major general. Military educational requirements include the 

successful completion or equivalent or constructive 

credit for completion of an appropriate accredited 

US Army Command and General Staff College or 

higher level service school course. 

NGR 21 (Efficiency Reports—Officers and 

Warrant Officers) was revised to: (1) Prescribe the 

use of the new DA Form 67-5 for the Army National 

Guard, effective 30 September 1961; (2) Clarify 

the efficiency reporting channels for the Army National Guard, particularly in the case of general 

officers and officers of split divisions; (3) Change the 

reporting schedule for officers to conform with the 

active Army; (4) Eliminate the requirement, except 

for promotion to or within general officer grade, for 

a special efficiency report which accompanied recommendation for promotion of officers. 

NGR 25-6 (Enlisted Personnel—Promotions 

and Reductions). This is a new regulation which 

establishes the policies governing promotion and reduction of enlisted personnel of the Army National 

Guard. This NGR continues the promotion policies 

in effect, but limits promotion to authorized TOE 

vacancies. Promotions to grades E-8 and E-9 are 

subject to selection by promotion boards appointed 

by the State Adjutant General and promotions to 

E-9 are limited to quotas announced by the Chief, 

National Guard Bureau. Promotion to grade E-3 

(private first class) may be made after one year of 

service in grade E-2 regardless of authorized vacancies. 

Later the regulation was changed to provide for 

the promotion to pay grade E-5 of individuals in 

pay grade E-4 or below who are selected to attend 

an active Army OCS or an ARNG Special Officer 

Candidate School. 

NGR 29 (Military Personnel—Record of Emergency Data) implements the provisions of AR 640-

40 for the Army National Guard and prescribes the 

use of DA Form 41. (Record of Emergency Date) 

in lieu of DD Form 93, for members of the Army 

National Guard. 

NGR 63 (Deceased Personnel—Care and Disposition of Remains). This revised regulation increases the interment allowance from $125 to $200, 

and authorizes burial in a national cemetery. Places 

responsibility on active Army for care of remains 

of Army National Guard personnel who die while 

on active duty for training at an active Army installation, enroute to or from such training, or while 

hospitalized or undergoing treatment at Government 

expense as authorized by law, for injuries, illness 

or disease contracted or incurred while on such duty. 

Advisors 

NGB Pam 40-1 (Army National Guard Advisors Handbook) was revised for the purpose of 

providing up-to-date information and guidance for 

Army advisors assigned to duty with National Guard 

units. 

Technicians 

NGR 51 (Technicians—Army National Guard). 

New features in this revised regulation which establishes policies for administering the ARNG technician program in the several States are as follows: 

(1) Specifically delineates the responsibilities of the 

State Adjutants General with respect to the program; 

(2) Clarifies the requirement for Army National 

Guard membership for employment of technicians, 

permitting the employment of female employees in 

the office of the United States Property and Fiscal 

Officer and of the State Maintenance Officer and certain non-National Guard male employees and members of the Air National Guard in United States 

Property and Fiscal Officers activities; (3) Permits 

certain commanders, other than general officers, to 
be employed as technicians. These include, commanders of on-site Air Defense missile units, commanders in USPFO field maintenance, and Army 

Aviation activities, and commanders employed as 

TPO and OCS staff assistant; (4) Provides for temporary employment and replacement of employees 

under certain conditions and for continued employment of certain categories of technicians whose military rank does not coincide with present requirements; (5) Includes examples of computing leave 

and clarifies provisions pertaining to leave; annual, 

sick and military; (6) Authorizes the payment of 

per diem for travel incident to the performance of 

essential and official travel; (7) Amplifies the policy 

regarding reemployment of Army National Guard 

technicians upon their return from a period of active 

duty. 

Training 

NGB Pam 44-2 announces the official winners 

for calendar year 1961 National Guard Association 

Trophy, the Pershing Trophy and the National 

Guard (State) Trophy competitions. 

NGB Pam 44-4 announces the official winners 

for the year ending 30 May 1961 of the Chief of the 

National Guard Bureau's Trophies (Indoor Rifle 

Matches, Postal). 

NGB Pam 44-5 announces the official winners 

for the calendar year 1961 of the Military Police 

Team Pistol Trophy. 

NGB Pam 45-4 (Annual Field Training—Administrative Instructions) contains the administrative procedures for the conduct of annual field training for units of the Army National Guard for 1962. 

NGR 46 (Military Education—Army National 

Guard Officer Candidate Training). This regulation 

has been revised to: (1) Prescribe a physical fitness test 

for candidates for active Army OCS and ARNG Special Officer Candidate Courses as required in AR 350-

50 for Army Officer Candidate Schools; (2) Prescribe additional educational requirements for applicants to attend OCS courses at the US Army Artillery and Missile School; (3) Require that applicants 

for OCS must have completed 18 months of active 

duty with one of the components of the Armed 

Forces; or two years service in the ARNG to include 

two annual field training periods; or six months 

active duty for training plus a minimum of six 

months service in the ARNG, except for individuals 

who have completed basic combat training in an 

active duty for training status, of a lesser duration, 

provided they have served an additional six months 

in the ARNG; (4) Require that a National Agency 

Check will be initiated upon acceptance of an applicant for enrollment for active Army OCS and ARNG 

Special Officer Candidate Courses. However, for 

State OCS, the NAC will be initiated six months 

prior to the graduation date of the applicant. 

Logistics 

NGB Pam 75-2-3 (Federal Property—Accounting Procedures for Units and Activities) was changed 

to add procedures for accounting for items which 

accompany units into active Federal service. 

NGB Pam 75-2-4 (Federal Property—Supply 

and Accounting Procedures for the Scout Battalions, 

Alaska Army National Guard). This is a new pamphlet which prescribes modified supply accounting 

procedures for the Scout Battalions of the Alaska 

Army National Guard. 

NGR 75-5 (Federal Property—Financial Inventory Accounting). New features in the revised regulation pertain to reports. A new report on consolidation of supply management reports was established; 

the due date for reports was changed; and new reports control symbols assigned. 

NGB Pam 75-5-1 (Financial Inventory Accounting—Reporting Procedures). This pamphlet 

was revised to prescribe accounting procedures and 

records required for the accumulation of financial 

data for use in the preparation of supply management 

and statement of inventory transactions reports. 

NGR 75-9 (Stock Control—Supply Status Reporting System, Equipment Status Report, ARNG 

Activities) was revised to prescribe instructions for 

placing Army National Guard Equipment Status Reports on a penching card system with direct application to electric accounting machine procedures. 

NGB Pam 75-9-2 (Federal Property—Equipment Status Report, Army National Guard Activities 

RCS ARNGB-28) was developed in conjunction 

with NGR 75-9 to provide instructions and procedures for the preparation and submission of the 

Equipment Status Report, National Guard Activities (RCS ARNGB-28). This report combines the 

Equipment Status Report, National Guard Activities 

(RCS CSNGB-9) and the Equipment Status Report 

for Army National Guard STRAF and Round-Out 

Units (RCS CSNGB 97) into a single, simplified reporting procedure. 
AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

Personnel 

ANGR 35-04 (Military Personnel): Makes certain portions of TAC Manual 35-1 applicable to the 

ANG. Subject manual covers a Consolidated Unit 

Personnel Administration System which entails a 

punch card, machine record operation. The regulation is only applicable to ANG units committed to 

the Tactical Air Command. 

ANGR 35-07 (Classification of Airmen): Revised to align with amendments to AFM 35-1, which 

this regulation modifies for ANG classification purposes. 

ANGR 39-09 (Enlistment and Reeinlistment 

in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the 

Air Force): Revised to implement new periods of 

enlistment authorized by P.L. 87-378, enacted 4 

October 1961. Enlistment of non-prior service airmen is for four years. Enlistment of prior service 

airmen and reenlistments may be for 3 or 6 years, 

but in all instances must cover any unexpired service 

obligation. Mental requirements were revised to require a qualifying score as established by the USAF 

Training Prospectus for entry into 3-level training 

in the aptitude appropriate to the specialty of the 

manning document against which the airman is 

being enlisted. Other minor changes were for the 

purpose of clarification. 

ANGR 39-29 (Enlisted Personnel): Change to 

basic regulation (ANGR 39-29) which gives clarification relative to procedures for promoting or reduction of ANG airmen while they're on active duty 

for training. 

ANGR 39-29C (Promotion of Airmen): Amends 

the basic regulation to increase required time in 

grade for promotion to pay grade E-9 from 12 

months to 18 months, in consonance with Air Force 

policy. Revises criteria for promotion of airmen 

attending combined basic military training and basic 

technical training. 

ANGR 265-8 (Chaplain Reports): Consolidates 

into one publication several reports required to inform higher echelons of ANG chaplain activities. 

Training 

ANGR 50-05A (Training): Requires that all 

Air Guard applications for attendance at Air Force 

Schools be in the Bureau at least 120 days before 

the starting date. This is twice the time previously 

required but is necessary to expedite and simplify 

the funding and bookkeeping procedures involved. 

ANGR 50-08A (Training): Revised regulation 

spelling out new instructions on who and what's to 

be covered in the Air Guard's Flying Hour Achievement Report and how it's to be made out. 

Supply 

ANGR 67-02 (Supply): This is a new edition 

prescribing procedures for the preparation and submission of the annual Air National Guard Ammunition Report. 

ANGR 67-03 (Supply): A revised edition governing cash purchasing procedures for supplies and 

services at Air National Guard installations. 

ANGR 67-08 (Supply): Replaces ANGL 67-08 

governing direct issue of expendable supplies for 

units performing organization maintenance. 

Data Systems and Statistics 

ANGR 171-02 (Data Systems and Statistics): 

Tells how and when to report attendance at ANG 

training, including UTA's, additional flying training 

periods, field training and supplemental training exercises. Regulation is a brief and to-the-point document carrying with it a sample of the NGB Form 

60 on which the report is to be submitted in only 

one copy to the Bureau not later than the 15th 

of every month. This regulation replaces ANGR 

50-06 (20 Jan 59). 

93 
APPENDI X G 

ARMY NATIONAL 

GUARD OBLIGATIONS, 

FISCAL YEAR 1962 

(All Appropriations) 

Army National Guard, 1962 

Grand Total 

Apportioned to Slalei—Total 

1. Alabama 

2. Alaska 

3. Arizona 

4. Arkansas 

5. California 

6. Colorado 

7. Connecticut 

8. Delaware 

9. District of Columbia 

10. Florida 

1 1. Georgia 

12. Hawaii 

13. Idaho 

14. Illinois 

15. Indiana 

16. Iowa 

17. Kansas 

18. Kentucky 

19. Louisiana 

20. Maine 

21. Maryland 

22. Massachusetts 

23. Michigan 

24. Minnesota 

25. Mississippi 

26. Missouri 

27. Montana 

28. Nebraska 

29. Nevada 

30. New Hampshire 

31. New Jersey 

32. New Mexico 

33. New York 

34. North Carolina 

35. North Dakota 

36. Ohio 

37. Oklahoma 

38. Oregon 

39. Pennsylvania 

40. Puerto Rico 

4 1. Rhode Island 

42. South Carolina 

43. South Dakota 

44. Tennessee 

45. Texas 

46. Utah 

47. Vermont 

48. Virginia 

49. Washington 

50. West Virginia 

51. Wisconsin 

52. Wyoming 

Apportioned to Other than States—Total 

Chief of Engineers 

Chief, National Guard Bureau 

Chief Signal Officer 

Chief of Staff 

Chief of Transportation 

Finance A Accounts Office, USA 

The Adjutant General 

The Quartermaster General 

The Surgeon General 

First Army 

Second Army 

Third Army 

Fourth Army 

Fifth Army 

Sixth Army 

USARAL 

USARCAR.il 

USARHAW 

Grand Total 

All Appropriations 

392,412,305 

347,537,837 

11,644,694 

2,161,651 

2,291,841 

6,478,460 

20,636,241 

2,001,107 

6,282,147 

2,702,795 

1,470,616 

5,873,401 

9,241,473 

6,316,009 

3,185,574 

11,293,423 

7,555,255 

5,544,101 

5,465,846 

3,471,841 

6,625,369 

2,858,572 

7,397,943 

12,071,195 

11,973,256 

8,429,370 

9,706,114 

7,024,957 

2,966,472 

2,976,621 

1,170,124 

2,131,456 

11,925,396 

3,545,1 1 1 

22,008,406 

8,592,534 

2,106,767 

11,653,513 

6,127,862 

5,339,988 

15,701,521 

5,103,591 

3,204,749 

7,815,671 

3,088,315 

9,416,956 

12,189,087 

3,355,759 

3,036,499 

7,916,323 

6,838,140 

2,693,147 

5,115,101 

1,815,477 

44,874,468 

189,926 

38,067,764 

5,356 

1,413,295 

3,590 

38,902 

1,390,595 

75,917 

1 0,000 

886,852 

558,697 

368,320 

732,154 

445,870 

448,293 

38,562 

1 27,509 

72,866 

National 

Guard Personnel, Ar 

(2122060) 

209,009,808 

172,744,488 

6,871,227 

1,023,751 

1,269,675 

3,720,886 

9,873,275 

945,378 

3,059,685 

1,227,025 

763,924 

3,073,289 

3,647,953 

1,885,748 

1,349,129 

5,307,310 

4,262,772 

3,271,902 

3,132,621 

1,727,158 

3,259,489 

1,419,151 

3,223,731 

6,374,945 

5,053,865 

4,663,012 

4,506,272 

3,889,332 

1,272,478 

1,568,640 

385,986 

1,126,135 

5,150,168 

1,526,167 

10,528,258 

4,921,143 

969,340 

6,357,793 

3,810,999 

2,731,356 

7,626,688 

3,069,743 

1,447,576 

4,257,639 

1,528,019 

5,662,736 

6,817,745 

1,702,117 

1,591,349 

3,389,590 

2,940,501 

773,680 

2,070,340 

71 5,797 

36,265,320 

36,199,907 

1 0,000 

2 1 2 

1,527 

11,600 

4,550 

3,230 

2,628 

21,047 

10,619 
>perotioni and Maintenance Army National 

Guard (2122065) 

Operation! and Maintenance, Army 

(2122020) 

Military Construction, 

Army National Guard 

(21X2085) 

Military Construction, 

Army Reserve 

(21X2086) 

164,478,523 1,245,446 16,883,375 795,1 53 

1 55,869,375 1,245,446 16,883,375 795,153 

4,001,812 

1,104,087 

1,006,530 

2,583,266 

9,862,664 

922,092 

3,166,401 

1,321,641 

706,468 

2,513,633 

4,018,766 

4,223,090 

1,535,296 

5.976,496 

2,959,160 

2,247,242 

2,245,370 

1,715,823 

2,535,969 

1,423,596 

4,140,111 

5,234,035 

5,823,817 

3,451,772 

3,796,324 

2,785,100 

1,416,653 

1,299,939 

635,806 

958,317 

6,351,115 

1,659,428 

1 1,015,451 

2,816,259 

1,114,253 

5,201,089 

2,296,401 

2,212,351 

7,367,648 

1,745,166 

1,749,469 

2,680,280 

1,256,987 

3,158,702 

4,633,098 

1,480,851 

1,296,320 

4,374,237 

3,758,065 

978,428 

2,265,022 

847,479 

18,540 

3,560 

3,700 

9,871 

60,827 

964 

9,496 

154,129 

224 

3,721 

39,275 

945 

93,967 

9,617 

15,501 

15,147 

14,765 

6,390 

1,991 

8,975 

8,220 

9,418 

1 5,596 

27,304 

10,132 

21,512 

6,740 

3,882 

30,971 

47,151 

39,307 

284,297 

17,050 

15,098 

11,370 

95,182 

1 3,989 

15,499 

27,021 

754 

6,004 

7,370 

3,468 

8,669 

16,061 

4,700 

8,552 

10,020 

2,751 

3,383 

2,370 

753,115 

30,253 

11,936 

164,437 

546,643 

132,673 

46,565 

282,758 

1,535,479 

206,226 

207,1 82 

317,822 

9,810 

73,090 

22,470 

827,920 

6,850 

25,881 

452,797 

1,079,978 

287,282 

1,393,386 

329,013 

270,601 

104,160 

117,361 

-14 7 

384,806 

75,219 

447,647 

840,034 

11,804 

-55 1 

6,473 

380,782 

680,164 

288,682 

6,950 

871,748 

295,939 

111,983 

729,575 

1 56,730 

144,130 

143,944 

129,554 

931,772 

760,618 

249,831 

292,832 

480,067 

6,516 

15,738 

8,609,148 

189,926 

1,867,857 

5,356 

1,413,295 

3,590 

38,902 

1,390,595 

75,917 

886,640 

557,1 70 

356,720 

727,604 

442,640 

445,665 

38,562 

106,462 

62,247 
NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY (2122060) 

Army National Guard, 1962 

Grand Tofal 

Apportioned to States— 

1. Alabama 

2. Alaska 

3. Arizona 

4. Arkansas 

5. California 

6. Colorado 

7. Connecticut 

8. Delaware 

9. District of Columbia 

10. Florida 

1 1. Georgia 

12. Hawaii 

13. Idaho 

14. Illinois 

15. Indiana 

16. Iowa 

17. Kansas 

18. Kentucky 

19. Louisiana 

20. Maine 

21. Maryland 

22. Massachusetts 

23. Michigan 

24. Minnesota 

25. Mississippi 

26. Missouri 

27. Montana 

26. Nebraska 

29 Nevada 

30. New Hampshire 

31. New Jersey 

32. New Mexico 

33. New York 

34. North Carolina 

35. North Dakota 

36. Ohio 

37. Oklahoma 

36. Oregon 

39. Pennsylvania 

40. Puerto Rico 

4 1. Rhode Island 

42. South Carolina 

43. South Dakota 

44. Tennessee 

45. Texas 

46. Utah 

47. Vermont 

48. Virginia 

49. Washington 

50. West Virginia 

51. Wisconsin 

52. Wyoming 

Apportioned to Other than States—Total 

Chief National Guard Bureau 

The Surgeon General 

First Army 

Second Army 

Third Army 

Fourth Army 

Fifth Army 

Sixth Army 

USARCARIB 

USARHAW 

Total 

209,009,808 

172,744,488 

6,871,227 

1,023,751 

1,269,675 

3,720,886 

9,873,275 

945,378 

3,059,685 

1,227,025 

763,924 

3,073,289 

3,647,953 

1,885,748 

1,349,129 

5,307,310 

4,262,772 

3,271,902 

3,132,631 

1,727,158 

3,259,489 

1,419,151 

3,223,731 

6,374,945 

5,053,865 

4,663,012 

4,506,272 

3,889,332 

1,272,478 

1,568,640 

385,986 

1,126,135 

5,150,168 

1,526,167 

10,528,258 

4,921,143 

969,340 

6,357,793 

3,810,999 

2,731,356 

7,626,688 

3,069,743 

1,447,576 

4,257,639 

1,528,019 

5,662,736 

6,817,745 

1,702,117 

1,591,349 

3,389,590 

2,940,501 

773,680 

2,070,340 

715,797 

36,265,320 

36,199,907 

10,000 

2 1 2 

1,527 

11,600 

4,550 

3,230 

2,628 

21,047 

10,619 

Pay and Allowances, 

Active Duty 

for Training, 

Officers 

(7010) 

19,696,871 

19,648,072 

832,770 

56,991 

172,599 

437,929 

1,259,608 

103,779 

418,569 

147,298 

79,634 

328,327 

294,912 

183,632 

196,725 

571,503 

498,905 

444,475 

431,987 

174,169 

323,207 

204,506 

375,616 

623,714 

585,585 

478,974 

486,706 

508,697 

193,1 17 

225,301 

49,820 

176,743 

355,060 

192,748 

1,01 1,401 

572,038 

151,163 

767,797 

460,739 

334,269 

728,008 

276,023 

208,707 

412,021 

204,000 

712,761 

867,914 

242,212 

249,470 

312,186 

412,680 

87,211 

135,961 

87,904 

48,799 

16,710 

2 1 2 

1,268 

9,433 

3,800 

1,466 

8 1 0 

10,782 

4,318 

Pay and Allowances, 

Active Duty 

for Training, 

Enlisted 

(7020) 

57,294,388 

32,629,228 

1,581,061 

197,299 

222,600 

708,074 

1,678,318 

1 50,690 

743,104 

250,332 

134,687 

459,445 

493,152 

460,719 

218,670 

1,011,649 

813,837 

604,640 

703,486 

322,830 

618,718 

386,718 

625,098 

1,143,286 

916,143 

779,005 

878,464 

921,671 

233,869 

293,284 

73,251 

335,743 

403,767 

330,611 

1,670,905 

937,093 

149,540 

1,180,784 

598,106 

429,407 

1,384,811 

691,059 

331,421 

791,109 

321,715 

1,544,359 

1,610,602 

302,671 

415,669 

600,281 

526,889 

81,942 

258,800 

107,843 

24,665,160 

24,648,888 

63 

6 5 0 

9 8 2 

8,966 

5,611 

Pay and Allowant 

Inactive Duty 

for Training, 

Officers 

(7030) 

24,840,992 

24,840,992 

938,244 

68,064 

162,708 

550,228 

1,437,800 

164,199 

433,227 

185,811 

132,402 

478,934 

618,292 

234,002 

190,282 

775,287 

616,802 

501,291 

442,666 

278,219 

450,119 

1 68,670 

502.036 

915,887 

684,121 

618,292 

671,452 

499,056 

190,282 

251,639 

66,574 

152,524 

861,982 

225,059 

1,514,307 

696,790 

143,581 

948,429 

552,960 

413,851 

1,030,653 

333,1 18 

211,645 

630,216 

228,786 

715,172 

865,709 

263,563 

214,626 

524,145 

466,514 

1 40,600 

361,188 

118,988 
y an

d Allowance!, 

Inactive Duty 

for Training, 

Enlisted 

(7040) 

77,171,611 

77,171,611 

2,831,426 

409,010 

533,256 

1,646,842 

4,281,481 

430,618 

1,128,249 

512,419 

354,218 

1,470,119 

1,947,811 

774,031 

579,559 

2,504,990 

2,038,874 

1,496,358 

1,288,766 

806,443 

1,504,075 

500,844 

1,401,436 

3,034,388 

2,140,740 

1,955,529 

1,964,017 

1,541,889 

504,702 

680,654 

148,941 

358,076 

2,930,206 

630,492 

5,320,211 

2,223,314 

409,010 

2,907,055 

1,697,004 

1,270,245 

3,700,379 

1,457,000 

534,028 

2,003,375 

630,492 

2,109,872 

2,755,798 

686,827 

553,320 

1,612,887 

1,184,584 

391,260 

1,126,706 

267,785 

1:::::::::::::::::: ; 

Individual Clothing 

and 

Uniform Gratuities 

(7050) 

8,095,319 

8,055,419 

270,705 

33,941 

90,091 

181,854 

579,422 

40,745 

113,203 

42,928 

53,067 

165,529 

166,195 

72,548 

66,912 

211,472 

1<52.196 

121,373 

156,888 

70,778 

191,890 

45,961 

119758 

244,802 1 87,657 

195,430 

274,546 

171,308 

69,304 

73,035 

17,342 

17,918 

351,208 

57,466 

475,573 

259,696 

54,785 

304,420 

311,650 

117,341 

434,313 

126,832 

42,376 

201,196 

43,394 

241,681 

274,833 

80,161 

48,179 

173,239 1 25,944 

38,840 

65,425 

28,069 

39,900 

39,900 

Subsistence in Kind 

For ARNG Personnel 

(7060) 

14,117,633 

7,510,867 

315,092 

40,015 

49,282 

159,565 

445,944 

38,862 

165,333 

58,631 

5,015 

123,623 

109,238 

92,147 

58,372 

1 62,703 

104,710 

61,468 

87,319 

66,355 

141,354 

87,944 

1 28,470 

312,483 

459,313 

584,372 

197,130 1 23,629 

48.480 

24,968 1 7,547 

75,122 

1 49,768 

64,567 

359,083 1 97,1 56 

34,212 

178,665 

150,314 

108,308 

255,213 

138,901 

72,194 

1 89,575 

70,465 

316,449 

311,174 

62,607 

88,834 

119,050 1 24,472 

26,479 

61,244 

87,650 

6,606,766 

6,595,467 

10,000 

1,299 

Travel, 

Active Duty 

For Training, 

Officers 

(7070) 

1,1 13,008 

1,101,532 

28,487 

24,499 1 5,733 

13,481 

118,911 

9,014 

17,709 1 3,592 

1,935 

21,824 

9,380 

19,542 

23,072 

24,084 

12,547 

17,865 1 3,079 

5,262 

14,274 1 2,505 

21,734 

35,052 

29,033 

27,623 1 5,093 

18,144 

18,460 

10,806 

4,905 

4,879 

34,278 

6,371 

69,873 

20,970 

12,441 

29,322 

20,444 

36,732 

35,190 

26,698 

16,985 

12,355 

12,618 

10,996 

31,945 

26,228 

10,891 

13,817 

48,129 

3,168 

10,810 

8,747 

11,476 

7,200 

259 

2,099 

750 

783 

222 

163 

Travel, 

Active Duty 

For Training, 

Enlisted 

(7080) 

6,319,975 

1,460,533 

54,731 

191,140 

19,887 

7,913 

64,064 

7,359 

38,632 

13,723 

1,460 

23,528 

6,820 

48,819 

14,894 

38,090 

8,394 

8,898 

6,846 

2,432 

8,720 

9,021 

44,124 

37,726 

42,625 1 5,097 

13,002 

100,509 

13,292 8 554 

7,606 

1,615 

51,663 1 8,094 

82,088 

5,539 

11,616 

25,708 1 6,960 

17,065 

52,101 

18.617 

22,638 

4,337 

9,489 

7,943 

87,988 

24,523 

6,906 

30,616 

49,654 

4,142 

46,565 

6,760 

4,859,442 

4,857,965 

5 

331 

614 

5 2 7 

Other Costs 

Relating to 

ARNG Personnel 

(7090) 

360,011 

326,234 

18,711 

2,792 

3,519 

1 5,000 

7,726 

1 1 3 

1,658 

2,291 

1,506 

1,959 

2,153 

3 0 7 

6 4 2 

7,533 

1 6,508 1 5,533 

1,585 

6 7 0 

7,132 

2,983 

5,458 

27,607 

8,648 

8,691 

5,864 

4,431 

9 7 3 

3 9 9 

3,515 

1 2,237 

7 6 0 

24,817 

8,547 

2,992 

15,612 

2,823 

4,138 

6,019 

1,495 

7,583 

13,454 

7,059 

3,502 

11,780 

13,325 

3,452 

3,369 

1,634 3 7 

3,641 

2,051 

33,777 

33,777 

-
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 

Army National Guard, 1962 

Grand Total 

Apportioned States—Total 

1. Alabama 

2. Alaska 

3. Arizona 

4. Arkansas 

5. California 

6. Colorado 

7. Connecticut 

8. Delaware 

9. District of Columbia 

10. Florida 

1 1. Georgia 

12. Hawaii 

13. Idaho 

14. Illinois 

15. Indiana 

16. Iowa 

17. Kansas 

18. Kentucky 

19. Louisiana 

20. Maine 

2 1 . Maryland 

22. Massachusetts 

23. Michigan 

24. Minnesota 

26. Missouri 

29. Nevada 

33. New York 

35 North Dakota 

36. Ohio 

45. Texas 

48. Virginia 

49. Washington 

52. Wyoming 

Apportioned to Other than States—Total 

Chief of Engineers 

Chief, National Guard Bureau 

Chief Signal Officer 

Chief of Staff 

Chief of Transportation 

Finance & Accounts Office, U.S. Army 

The Adjutant General 

The Quartermaster General 

The Surgeon General 

First Army 

Second Army 

Third Army 

Fourth Army 

Fifth Army 

Sixth Army 

USARAL 

USARCARIB 

USARHAW 

Total 

164,478,523 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD (2122065) 

National 

Guard 

Bureau 

(7111) 

1,413,295 

155,869,375 • 

4,001,812 

1,104,087 

1,006,530 

2,583,266 

9,862,664 

922,092 

3,166,401 

1,321,641 

706,468 

2,513,633 

4,018,766 

4,223,090 

1,535,296 

5,976,496 

2,959,160 

2,247,242 

2,245,370 

1,715,823 

2,535,969 

1,423,596 

4,140,1 1 1 

5,234,035 

5,823,817 

3,451,772 

3,796,324 

2,785,100 

1,416,653 

1,299,939 

635,806 

958,317 

6,351,115 

1,659,428 

1 1,015,451 

2,816,259 

1,1 14,253 

5,201,089 

2,296,401 

2,212,351 

7,367,648 

1,745,166 

1,749,469 

2,680,280 

1,256,987 

3,158,702 

4,633,098 

1,480,851 

1,296,320 

4,374,237 

3,758,065 

978,428 

2,265,022 

847,479 

8,609,148 

189,926 

1,867,857 

5,356 

1,413,295 

3,590 

38,902 

1,390,595 

75,917 

886,640 

557,170 

356,720 

727,604 

442,640 

445,665 

38,562 

106,462 

62,247 

1,413,295 

1,413,295 

Recruiting 

and 

Publicity 

(7112) 

464,257 

464,257 

464,257 

Armory 

Drill 

(7211) 

682,036 

21,252 

48 

3,230 

459 

131 

671 

322 

1,221 

164 

638 

416 

791 

59 

44 

149 

120 

278 

66 

14 

44 

969 

487 

98 

416 

834 

480 

481 

124 

1,415 

3 

292 

233 

27 

715 

821 

72 

173 

123 

748 

2,822 

80 

180 

278 

140 

1 1 

365 

660,784 

1,400 

26,888 

2,999 

24,864 

32,600 

123,194 

229,066 

115,530 

60,758 

32,716 

3,020 

7,749 

Field 

Training 

(7221) 

986,010 

659,621 

47,264 

2,862 

3,260 

23,585 

30,501 

1,881 

10,514 

2,933 

1,989 

9,126 

27,710 

32,988 

8,194 

1 5,577 

1 1,740 

12,833 

15,027 

3,347 

5,130 

6,333 

9,365 

19,083 

20,039 

24,380 

1 9,969 

1 5,767 

4,520 

6,696 

1,514 

4,508 

12,167 

18,751 

32,358 

14,981 

6,568 

20,093 

10,802 

7,186 

27,441 

12,332 

3,731 

13,508 

7,552 

22,075 

12,988 

12,736 

5,057 

8,512 

5,183 

1,821 

1,989 

3,155 

326,389 

1,273 

12,014 

28,657 

39,033 

53,700 

29,771 

103,897 

54,150 

1,212 

202 

2,480 

Procurement of 

Organizational 

Equipment 

(7321) 

6,519,845 

6,445,393 

280,962 

127,589 

64,642 

135,005 

344,861 

42,823 

109,566 

98,779 

31,374 

115,143 

1 17,660 

74,918 

114,931 

179,332 

147,629 

106,126 

165,602 

130,340 

103,329 

136,543 

86,061 

274,745 

154,249 

164,620 

234,720 

134,009 

88,368 

49,662 

28,731 

48,214 

185,505 

52,979 

283,660 

1 20,948 

81,193 

1 60,809 

110,553 

107,993 

161,973 

123,065 

41,120 

109,225 

37,773 

137,253 

271,100 

69,138 

60,833 

84,216 

1 15,859 

79,139 

131,141 

29,385 

74,452 

1,534 

72,918 

Repair 

Parts 

and 

Materiels 

(Except 

for Depot 

Maintenance) 

(7411) 

8,575,148 

8,575,148 

259,683 

28,874 

79,900 

150,1 1 1 

623,809 

44,053 

96,582 

55,107 

23,399 

258,808 

439,250 

87,642 

119,252 

130,369 

181,239 

96,941 

128,410 

109,726 

167,692 

53,242 

132,198 

260,455 

315,047 

157,336 

354,796 

157,624 

104,851 

84,910 

25,699 

36,116 

321,559 

113,685 

542,521 

172.685 

53,358 

348,098 

139,278 

131,107 

282,822 

99,698 

40,925 

168,802 

75,779 

213,570 

285,338 

145,617 

89,756 

314,302 

106,641 

62,288 

64,281 

39,917 

Petroleum, 

0i!; 

and 

Lubricants 

(7412) 

5,285,031 

5,285,031 

196,701 

13,717 

39,411 

1 24,778 

282,298 

29,096 

74,463 

49,207 

11,321 

86,292 

1 06,004 

35 077 

66,710 

134,965 

141,704 

1 18,185 

132,586 

53,148 

98,267 

86,921 

68,238 

151,472 

195,333 

206,169 

162,938 

180,144 

70,779 

57,280 

22,731 

43,547 

135,555 

62,693 

265,068 

101,913 

38,204 

205,712 

90,960 

77,008 

162,662 

38,718 

38,900 

114,156 

73,208 

226,471 

204,982 

46,734 

63,643 

82,142 

98,524 

35,163 

43,54n 

39,593 
Olhtr 

Operating 

Supplitt 

and 

quipmenl 

(7413 ) 

1,834,361 

814,84 6 

23,16 6 

8,80 7 

11,536 

11,694 

43,58 0 

5,937 

11,765 

5,502 

2,271 

17,445 

26,45 8 

9,752 

12,041 

27,918 

13,603 

11,635 

11,437 

11.022 

12,381 

21,418 

12,550 

20,64 0 

25,41 4 

25,21 9 

30,021 

14,529 

9,460 

7,64 0 

4,845 

3,931 

30,56 4 

9,059 

48,92 7 

14,550 

8,026 

32,03 4 

21,53 3 

11,230 

33,21 5 

6,575 

8,746 

18,665 

6,336 

1 7,98 9 

30,16 4 

8,680 

10,489 

16,158 

10,537 

5,948 

8,484 

3,320 

1,019,515 

7,82 2 

1,011,595 

9 8 

Support of 

Nafiona l 

Guard 

Unlit 

(7511 ) 

2,619,184 

2,213,95 7 

86,36 8 

45,48 7 

26,868 

34,93 6 

113,55 5 

14,572 

29,78 5 

1 3,040 

7,383 

51,09 3 

50,15 0 

31,04 2 

40,65 2 

71,40 4 

39,97 9 

25,54 0 

31,50 7 

34.18 8 

41,82 8 

38,08 0 

20,75 7 

60,47 4 

57,73 9 

55,93 8 

67,71 3 

57,08 3 

38,93 2 

20,34 6 

21,20 5 

11,610 

49,45 7 

43,11 1 

100,41 0 

49,91 0 

31,09 6 

67,18 5 

32,44 2 

35,11 9 

75,76 9 

16,559 

8,126 

53,93 7 

24,668 

64,07 3 

80,78 8 

22,73 9 

24,74 8 

44,14 6 

72,24 6 

22,51 6 

28,27 6 

27,38 2 

405,22 7 

10,45 6 

5,356 

2,317 

379,00 0 

1,359 

4 8 3 

9 3 0 

1,177 

4,14 9 

Organiza -

tional 

Technicians 

(7512 ) 

59,395,69 8 

59,395,69 8 

2,053,50 9 

326,51 6 

386,09 5 

1,315,576 

3,449,15 7 

406,67 4 

863,87 5 

539,29 7 

344,05 6 

1,209,108 

1,551,946 

625,84 8 

517,07 3 

1,653,950 

1,512,924 

1,132,485 

1,078,096 

778,77 8 

1,186,779 

492,04 0 

.938,67 9 

2,046,40 0 

1,533,079 

1,365,827 

1,595,333 

1,275,132 

493,72 5 

569,68 2 

245,69 6 

381,51 6 

2,302,241 

722,30 0 

3,704,71 5 

1,543,378 

427,08 2 

2,289,77 3 

1,227,484 

1,026,925 

2,438,93 3 

864,10 0 

503,53 6 

1,426,902 

605,03 7 

1,601,500 

2,134,20 9 

613,29 0 

554,10 4 

1,036,048 

1,1 14,173 

350,06 0 

741,69 9 

299,35 8 

US. 

Proporfy 

a nd 

Fitcal 

Office 

Techniciant 

(7513 ) 

14,875,61 2 

14,875,61 2 

427,86 6 

164,49 5 

161,78 5 

264,15 9 

697,28 9 

145,81 5 

228,70 3 

1 54,57 9 

128,12 8 

309,25 1 

340,02 2 

313,42 2 

202,74 6 

401,52 8 

311,14 9 

257,10 7 

244,321 

204,51 1 

297,59 6 

285,27 9 

232,65 7 

379,41 9 

376,58 1 

352,79 0 

346,59 2 

311,10 2 

176,131 

180,81 0 

1 16,832 

191,60 9 

422,82 8 

222,80 0 

792,48 2 

320,72 3 

161,764 

458,76 2 

287,59 6 

258,83 0 

475,56 7 

267,22 4 

197,97 7 

304,91 9 

168,62 2 

326,02 4 

526,45 2 

190,05 5 

175,59 7 

251,05 6 

31 1,292 

174,44 2 

219,08 1 

1 57,24 5 

Field 

Mainte -

nance 

Techniciant 

(7514 ) 

24,216,88 3 

24,216,88 3 

563,93 4 

124,18 5 

204,89 6 

426,51 7 

1,482,616 

199,321 

451,78 8 

260,73 3 

142,20 0 

390,75 4 

952,42 6 

453,12 0 

368,80 9 

618,25 9 

509,81 8 

419,75 2 

404,14 4 

336,12 8 

540,65 8 

257,96 9 

345,86 6 

575,24 9 

568,74 2 

586,74 6 

719,19 4 

538,84 8 

355,03 5 

265,84 7 

148,97 2 

197,47 2 

1,083,157 

376,46 6 

1,569,478 

411,76 9 

198,773 

750,60 2 

345,02 3 

451,22 5 

841,82 0 

240,67 6 

246,04 6 

428,89 7 

228,45 7 

507,14 1 

860,47 0 

2 8 6 58 3 

254,46 9 

574,85 0 

533,22 9 

198,511 

245,17 2 

174,071 

Second 

Dettination 

Trantportation 

From 

Depott 

(7519 ) 

1,383,788 

1,383,788 

1,383,788 

Federal 

Facililiet, 

Including Repairs, Utilities, 

and Other Expenses Incident 

to Opening, 

Operating and 

Closing 

Summer Camps 

(7521 ) 

2,643,10 4 

2,643,10 4 

802,27 4 

485,53 7 

179,40 3 

468,28 4 

223,21 3 

329,82 7 

4,634 

102,06 3 

47,86 9 

Other 

Facililiet, 

Repairs, 

and 

Utilities 

(7522 ) 

5,867,17 6 

5,866,851 

62,31 0 

258,32 4 

27,67 8 

96,77 4 

173,63 6 

31,59 8 

109,684 

142,464 

14,348 

65,39 2 

406,97 7 

67,80 4 

84,47 2 

1 57,78 8 

89,31 6 

66,59 5 

34,091 

54,51 5 

82,03 2 

45,70 4 

54,39 9 

144,00 9 

403,93 7 

512,26 0 

264,95 2 

96,85 8 

74,01 8 

56,58 6 

19,100 

39,79 4 

103,55 9 

37,46 0 

376,00 6 

65,39 9 

107,89 7 

201,98 2 

30,70 4 

105,01 2 

139,51 3 

76,22 0 

53,86 0 

41,19 8 

29,38 0 

42,48 2 

224,84 9 

82,45 9 

57,54 5 

78,98 1 

57,35 3 

48,40 2 

95,48 6 

73,68 9 

3 2 5 

3 2 5 

Other 

Facililiet, 

Repairt, 

a nd 

Restorations 

(7523 ) 

Opera -

tional 

Cottt 

(7621 ) 

218,01 2 26,084,51 4 

218,01 2 

188,52 6 

29,48 6 

26,084,51 4 

2,502,33 3 

1,106,254 

2,386,43 6 

2,448,28 8 

2,140,26 5 

1,219,223 

2,066,191 

3,588 

1,598,997 

3,128,14 6 

632,25 3 

2,578,151 

566,12 1 

1,009 

1,802,124 

1,254,572 

650,56 3 

Mainte -

nance 

a n d 

Utilitiet 

(7631 ) 

1,414,56 9 

1,414,56 9 

1 18,35 8 

73,42 2 

104,40 3 

136,32 6 

99,06 2 

82,82 2 

106,49 7 

105,52 6 

170,26 3 

33,55 3 

148,96 0 

40,38 1 

81,52 2 

78,17 6 

35,29 7 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

(2122020) 

Army National Guard, 1962 

Total 

Apportioned to States—Total 

1. Alabama 

2 Alaska 

10. Florida 

1 1 . Georgia 

13 Idaho 

18. Kentucky 

20. Maine 

21. Maryland 

23. Michigan 

24. Minnesota 

25. Mississippi 

26. Missouri 

29 Nevada 

30. New Hampshire 

31. New Jersey 

32. New Mexico 

33. New York 

35. North Dakota 

36 Ohio 

37. Oklahoma 

38. Oregon 

39. Pennsylvania 

41. Rhode Island 

45. Texas 

46 Utah 

48. Virginia 

49. Washington 

50. West Virginia 

52. Wyoming 

Total 

(2122020) 

1,245,446 

1,245,446 

18,540 

3,560 

3,700 

9,871 

60,827 

964 

9,496 

154,129 

224 

3,721 

39,275 

945 

93,967 

9,617 

15,501 

15,147 

14,765 

6,390 

1,991 

8975 

8,220 

9,418 

1 5,596 

27,304 

10,132 

21,512 

6,740 

3,882 

30,971 

47,151 

39,307 

284,297 

17,050 

15,098 

1 1,370 

95,182 

13 989 

1 5,499 

27,021 

754 

6,004 

7,370 

3,468 

8,669 

16,061 

4,700 

8,552 

10,020 

2,751 

3,383 

2,370 

Related 

Maintenance 

Activities 

(2350) 

789,935 

789,935 

2,700 

7,222 

31,500 

151,629 

391 

30,006 

73,829 

117 

555 

5,298 

8,390 

454 

3,022 

5,482 

6,371 

5,133 

96 

8,990 

29,527 

2,046 

17,999 

279,874 

5,527 

3,387 

6,078 

70,083 

2,824 

5,222 

159 

315 

1 14 

1,168 

3,899 

13,725 

3,625 

3,178 

Procurement 

of Parts 

and 

Modification 

(2360) 

106,081 

106,081 

2,614 

144 

4,466 

1 3,673 

122 

2,598 

3,188 

2,170 

640 

41,861 

15,497 

2,980 

3 0 6 

1,669 

2,277 

4,062 

1 0 0 

1,392 

3,333 

2,989 

Medical 

Services in 

Non-Army 

Facilities, 

Except 

Medicare 

Administered 

by Executive 

Agent 

(2430) 

349,430 

349,430 

13,225 

3,560 

3,700 

2,650 

29,327 

9 6 4 

9,496 

2,500 

224 

3,186 

4,803 

945 

6,465 

9,500 

14,946 

9,849 

6,376 

5,814 

1,991 

3,355 

2,738 

9,418 

9,225 

18,983 

10,036 

10,352 

6,100 

3,882 

1,444 

3,243 

5,811 

4,423 

8,543 

11,711 

4,986 

25,099 

9,496 

8,000 

22,800 

339 

5,890 

7,370 

2,300 

3,378 

2,336 

4,700 

1,594 

3,853 

2,751 

3,383 

2,370 
ATIONAI 

Tola) 

(21x2085) 

16,883,375 

16,883,375 

753,1 15 

30,253 

1 1,936 

1 64,437 

546,643 

132,673 

46,565 

282,758 

1,535,479 

206,226 

207,182 

317833 

9,810 

73 090 

22,470 

827,920 

6,850 

25,881 

452,797 

1,079,978 

287,282 

1,393,386 

329,013 

270,601 

104,160 

117,361 

-14 7 

384,806 

75,219 

447,647 

840,034 

1 1,804 

-55 1 

6,473 

380,782 

680,164 

288,682 

6,950 

871,748 

295,939 

1 11,983 

729,575 

1 56,730 

144,130 

143,944 

1 29,554 

931,772 

760,618 

249.831 

GUARD (21X2085) 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY RESERVE 

(21X2086) 

National 

Guord 

Bureau 

(8511) 

11,687,060 

1 1,687,060 

1 56,088 

2,515 

1,586 

157,951 

510,024 

1 26,064 

5,997 

183,185 

588,443 

183,379 

197,363 

300,513 

855 

73,090 

646,793 

-45 0 

- 7 

433,379 

186,112 

649 

527,862 

318,183 

102,060 

113,571 

-14 7 

383,116 

72,300 

421,204 

518,996 

-55 1 

325,394 

660,847 

284,905 

786,186 

274,882 

111,983 

662,423 

107,230 

131,108 

143,944 

121,698 

880,830 

743,230 

242,278 

Nonarmory 

Facilititt 

National 

Guard 

(8512) 

4,170,981 

4,170,981 

573,906 

• 

83,834 

807,495 

155,681 

882,849 

273,999 

832,973 

262,116 

287,616 

-27 3 

-50 0 

5,145 

1,041 

5,100 

Minor 

Construction 

(8541) 

394,298 

394,298 

35,250 

41,695 

91,344 

1 6,305 

9 4 8 

25,888 

1,690 

6,473 

50,000 

35,009 

39,696 

50,000 

Advance 

Planning 

(8551) 

631,036 

631,036 

23,122 

27,738 

10,350 

6,486 

1,369 

6,608 

-1,12 7 

1 5,739 

48,198 

6,542 

9,819 

17,309 

8,955 

21,522 

25,446 

7,300 

19,418 

11,017 

12,635 

32,551 

10,830 

8,485 

2,100 

3,791 

2,918 

26,443 

33,422 

1 2,078 

5,388 

19,317 

3,777 

6,950 

50,553 

21,057 

27,454 

7,878 

6,815 

45,842 

17,388 

7,553 

Total 

(21x2086) 

795,153 

795,153 

292,832 

480,067 

6,516 

1 5,738 

USAR 

ARMORIES 

(8611) 

785,814 

785,814 

292,832 

480,067 

6,516 

6,399 

Advance 

Planning 

(8651) 

9,339 

9,339 

9,339 
APPENDI X H 

Military Construction, Air National Guard -

Appropriation 

AIR NATIONAL 

Operations and 

Air National Guard—1962 Grand 

Total 

57X3830 

Total 

Advance 

Project 

Planning 

310 

ANG 

Construction 

320 

Minor 

Construction 

340 

5723840 

Total 

Grand Total $257,274,483 $41,434,781 $2,071,621 $37,832,081 $1,531,079 $171,647,591 

Apportioned to States—Total 128,612,912 5,456,724 27,397 3,910,237 1,519,090 107,063,1 13 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

20. 

21. 

22. 

23. 

24. 

25. 

26. 

27. 

28. 

29. 

30. 

3 1. 

32. 

33. 

34. 

35. 

36. 

37. 

38 

39. 

40. 

4 1. 

42. 

43. 

44. 

45. 

46. 

47. 

48. 

49. 

50. 

51. 

52. 

Alabama 

Alaska 

Arizona 

Arkansas 

California 

Colorado 

Connecticut 

Delaware 

District of Columbia 

Florida 

Georgia 

Hawaii 

Idaho 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

Maine 

Maryland 

Massachusetts 

Michigan 

Minnesota 

Mississippi 

Missouri 

Montana 

Nebraska 

Nevada 

New Hampshire 

New Jersey 

New Mexico 

New York 

North Carolina 

North Dakota 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

Oregon 

Pennsylvania 

Puerto Rico 

Rhode Island 

South Carolina 

South Dakota 

Tennessee 

Texas 

Utah 

Vermont 

Virginia 

Washington 

West Virginia 

Wisconsin 

Wyoming 

Apportioned to Other than States—Total 

National Guard Bureau 

Directorate of Administrative Services 

Air Force Logistics Command 

Yards & Docks, Bureau of 

Lackland AFB, Texas 

Office, Corps of Engineers 

Military Air Transport Service 

Aeronautical Chart « Information Center 

2,246,973 

1,121,626 

2,459,305 

1,878,307 

8,552,046 

3,410,267 

1,878,902 

1,231,267 

1,495,765 

1,798,960 

4,061,642 

3,896,047 

1,687,889 

2,945,241 

1,673,802 

3,984,792 

2,482,712 

1,568,962 

1,821,263 

1,799,345 

1,888,070 

2,307,286 

4,134,597 

2,513,27 

1,781,976 

3,031,41 1 

1,668,938 

1,367,017 

1,158,083 

772,618 

2,733,265 

1,568,559 

6,061,134 

1,376,418 

1,596,093 

3,722,498 

2,668,565 

1,868,785 

5,440,013 

1,665,860 

1,222,994 

962,581 

1,727,523 

4,122,361 

5,528,097 

1,936,1 17 

1,719,436 

593,658 

2,557,780 

2,101,051 

3,753,838 

1,067,906 

5,550 

34,549 

76,479 

2,198,561 

1 40,000 

48,259 

72 957 

3,041 

443,503 

6,093 

170,275 

1,600 

147,528 

38,141 

46,568 

45,143 

35,770 

21,278 

108,805 

44,115 

17,290 

4,000 

51,017 

48,439 

1,000 

68,274 

255,538 

36,049 

60,01 1 

53,607 

176,099 

35,781 

51,138 

171,364 

164,510 

2,000 

260,609 

244,950 

66,833 

5,550 

2,097,596 

140,000 

40,545 

3,041 

365,650 

30,712 

1,600 

7,614 

108,805 

4,000 

51,017 

1,000 

159,634 

1,760 

4,250 

7,076 

171,849 

134,476 

650 

2,000 

1,243 

129,611 

142,468 

244,950 

66,833 

34,549 

76,479 

100,965 

48,259 

32,412 

77,381 

6,093 

139,563 

147,528 

38,1 41 

38,954 

45,143 

35,770 

21,278 

44,115 

17,290 

42,207 

68,274 

88,904 

34,289 

60,01 1 

46,531 

35,781 

51,138 

36,888 

34,249 

1 1 6,898 

1,759,877 

1,054,514 

2,223,935 

1,508,701 

5,390,750 

3,156,331 

1,635,399 

1,076,949 

1,269,556 

1,494,851 

3,419,941 

3,168,221 

1,508,565 

2,362,150 

1,350,506 

3,458,782 

2,192,014 

1,336,069 

1,606,447 

1,496,646 

1,668,862 

1,863,383 

3,61 1,958 

2,124,513 

1,480,044 

2,557,270 

1,391,524 

1,212,800 

996,575 

649,504 

2,413,073 

1,377,496 

4,998,799 

1,144,056 

1,300,458 

3,1 1 2,878 

2,044,403 

1,588,807 

4,690,543 

1,279,876 

1,054,350 

805,529 

1,334,700 

3,625,305 

4,601,856 

1,697,174 

1,520,111 

496,659 

1,928,808 

1,868,363 

3,192,851 

960,381 

128,661,571 35,978,057 2,044,224 33,921,844 11,989 64,584,478 

88,314,528 

27,122 

5,296,136 

6,569,363 

770,149 

27,466,753 

9,895 

207,625 

1,941,941 

6,569,363 

93,677 

460,964 

1,848,264 

6,108,399 

60,985,641 

27,122 

3,354,195 

1,489,583 25,965,181 11,989 

9,895 

207,625 
GUARD OBLIGATIONS 

Maintenance Appropriation 

National Guard Personnel, Air ForceAppropriation 

Training 

Support 

440 

Medical 

Support 

470 

Service 

Wide 

Support 

4*0 

5723(50 

Total 

ANG 

Pertonnel 

520 

Grand 

Total Air National Guard—1962 

$109,947,868 $694,468 $150,297 $44,1 92,1 1 1 $44,1 92,1 1 1 $257,274,483 Grand Total 

106,378,490 684,623 1 6,093,075 16,093,075 128,612,912 Apportioned to Statei—Total 

1,739,800 

1,052,389 

2,216,440 

1,496,211 

5,354,495 

3,151,885 

1,625,715 

1,060,153 

1,262,327 

1,484,469 

3,377,734 

3,160,349 

1,501,142 

2,353,984 

1,335,239 

3,442,195 

2,179,883 

1,331,042 

1,600,286 

1,489,144 

1,663,511 

1,825,389 

3,595,349 

2,112,746 

1,472,188 

2,540,768 

1,386,347 

1,198,349 

994,007 

638,648 

2,390,768 

1,371,814 

4,954,558 

1,127,849 

1,298,647 

3,100,971 

2,025,142 

1,581,615 

4,655,353 

1,268,440 

1,043,071 

804,548 

1,329,807 

3,590,202 

4,583,294 

1,689,580 

1,515,409 

495,630 

1,920,787 

1,850,924 

3,186,175 

951,722 

20,077 

2,125 

7,495 

1 2,490 

36,255 

4,446 

9,684 

1 6,796 

7,229 

10,382 

42,207 

7,872 

7,423 

8,166 

1 5,267 

16,587 

12,131 

5,027 

6,161 

7,502 

5,351 

37,994 

16,609 

1 1,767 

7.856 

16,502 

5,177 

14,451 

2,568 

10,856 

22,305 

5,682 

44,241 

16,207 

1,811 

11,907 

19,261 

7,192 

35,190 

11,436 

11,279 

981 

4,893 

35,103 

18,562 

7,594 

4,702 

1,029 

8,021 

17,439 

6,676 

8,659 

481,546 

67,112 

200,821 

293,127 

962,735 

113,936 

243,503 

154,318 

177,950 

231,152 

638,660 

284,323 

173,231 

412,816 

321,696 

378,482 

252,557 

186,325 

1 69,673 

266,929 

197,930 

443,903 

413,834 

344,643 

284,642 

470,141 

226,397 

154,217 

1 1 3,069 

122,1 14 

320,192 

122,789 

806,797 

196,313 

235,624 

556,013 

448,063 

244,197 

698,332 

214,620 

168,644 

157,052 

228,313 

495,056 

665,632 

238,943 

199,325 

96,999 

384,022 

232,688 

494,154 

107,525 

481,546 

67,1 12 

200,821 

293,127 

962,735 

113,936 

243,503 

154,318 

177,950 

231,152 

638,660 

284,323 

173,231 

412,8161 

321,696! 

378,482 

252,557! 

186,325 

1 69,673 

266,929 

197,930 

443,903 

413,834 

344,643! 

284,642 

470,141 

226,397 

1 54,217' 

1 13,069 

122,114 

320,192 

1 22,789 

806,797 

196,313 

235,624! 

556,013 

448,063 

244,197 

698,332 

214,620! 

168,644 

1 57,052 

228,313 

495,056 

665,632 

238,943 

199,325 

96,999; 

384,022 

232,688 

494,154 

107,525 

2,246,973 

1,121,626 

2,459,305 

1,878,307 

8,522,046 

3,410,267 

1,878,902 

1,231,267 

1,495,765 

1,798,960 

4,061,642 

3,896,047 

1,687,889 

2,945,241 

1,673,802 

3,984,792 

2,482,712 

1,568,962 

1,821,263 

1,799,345 

1,888,070 

2,307,286 

4,134,597 

2,513,271 

1,781,976 

3,031,41 1 

1,668,938 

1,367,017 

1,158,083 

772,618 

2,733,265 

1,568,559 

6,061,134 

1,376,418 

1,596,093 

3,722,498 

2,668,565 

1,868,785 

5,440,013 

1,665,860 

1,222,994 

962,581 

1,727,523 

4,122,361 

5,528,097 

1,936,1 17 

1,719,436 

593,658 

2,557,780 

2,101,051 

3,753,838 

1,067,906 

Alabama 

Alaska 

Arizona 

Arkansas 

California 

Colorado 

Connecticut 

Delaware 

District of Columbia 

Florida 

Georgia 

Hawaii 

Idaho 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

Maine 

Maryland 

Massachusetts 

Michigan 

Minnesota 

Mississippi 

Missouri 

Montana 

Nebraska 

Nevada 

New Hampshire 

New Jersey 

New Mexico 

New York 

North Carolina 

North Dakota 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

Oregon 

Pennsylvania 

Puerto Rico 

Rhode Island 

South Carolina 

South Dakota 

Tennessee 

Texas 

Utah 

Vermont 

Virginia 

Washington 

West Virginia 

Wisconsin 

Wyoming 

19,469,958 

19,442,836 

27,122 

3,569,378 

3,351,858 

9,895 

207 625 

9,845 

9,845 

150,297 

147,960 

2,337 

28,099,036 

27,328,887 

770.149 

28,099,036 

27,328,887 

770,149 

128,661,571 

88,314,528 

27,122 

5,296,136 

Apportioned to Other than States—Total 

National Guard Bureau 

27,466,753 Office, Corps of Engineers 

9,895 Military Air Transport Service 

207,625 Aeronautical Chart & Information Center 
APPENDI X I 

MOBILIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD UNITS 

Total Mobilized Strength: 44,371 

Mobilized Strength Duty Station Home Station 

ALABAMA (3466)* 

HHC, 1 Medium Tank Battalion, 131 Armor 

146 Engineer Construction Company 

71 1 Signal Battalion, Combat Area 

145 Quartermaster Company 

900 Engineer Company, Maint. Direct Support 

1 28 Medical Company, Ambulance 

186 Engineer Company, Lt. Equipment 

1 29 Medical Clearing Company 

403 Ordnance Company, Ammunition 

252 Transportation Company, Direct Support 

HHB, 2 Howitzer Battalion, 203 Artillery 

279 Signal Battalion, Corps 

109 Evacuation Hospital 

131 Ordnance Company, General Auto Support 

1 56 Military Police Battalion, Army 

ARIZONA (73) 

222 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

ARKANSAS (615) 

404 Ordnance Company, General Auto Support 

216 Medical Clearing Company 

172 Engineer Company, Maint. Direct Support 

148 Evacuation Hospital 

296 Medical Holding Company 

219 Medical Company, Ambulance 

CALIFORNIA (360) 

152 Medical Company, Air Ambulance 

3668 Ordnance Company, Ammo 

161 Ordnance Company, Field Supply 

1 23 Ordnance Company, General Support 

COLORADO (798) 

928 Medical Company, Ambulance 

169 Field Artillery HHB 

947 Medical Clearing Company 

1 40 Signal Battalion, Combat Area 

122 Medical Company, Ambulance 

DELAWARE (265) 

1049 Transportation Company, Aircraft Hwy Maint. 

109 Ordnance Battalion, Ammunition HHD 

1 1 6 Surgical Hospital 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (170) 

107 Engineer Company, Panel Bridge 

1 14 Engineer Company, Panel Bridge 

FLORIDA (296) 

379 Signal Detachment (RQ) 

39 Signal Detachment (RQ) 

144 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

149 Quartermaster Company, Petrol Depot 

138 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

543 

180 

561 

66 

159 

62 

84 

91 

146 

131 

400 

398 

144 

101 

400 

73 

Cp. Irwin 

Ft. Rucker 

Ft. Gordon 

Ft. Lee 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Benning 

Ft. Benning 

Ft. Benning 

Ft. Chaffee 

Ft. Eustis 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Hood 

Ft. Polk 

Ft, Benning 

Ft. Gordon 

Ft. Ord 

Ozark 

Enterprise 

Mobile 

Georgiana 

Brundidge 

Fairhope 

Brewton 

Mobile 

Florala 

Birmingham 

Auburn 

Huntsville 

Tarrant 

Oxford 

Linden 

108 

85 

140 

136 

8 0 

66 

57 

130 

93 

8 0 

4 5 

9 3 

68 

5 4 2 

5 0 

139 

4 7 

7 9 

89 

81 

5 

6 

85 

1 1 5 

8 5 

Ft. Chaffee 

Ft. Benning 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Chaffee 

Ft. Chaffee 

Ft. Chaffee 

Ft. Ord 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. Lewis 

Cp. Irwin 

Ft. Carson 

Ft. Sill 

Ft. Carson 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Meade 

Aberdeen PG 

Ft. Campbell 

Ft. Meade 

Ft. Benning 

Tobyhana 

Tobyhana 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Lee 

Ft. Benning 

Monticello 

Lake Village 

Heber Springs 

Little Rock 

Booneville 

Dewitt 

Sacramento 

Redlands 

Long Beach 

Long Beach 

Burlington 

Denver 

Denver 

Denver 

Trinidad 

New Castle 

Middletown 

New Castle 

Washington, D.C 

Washington, D.C 

Cp. Blanding 

Jacksonville 

Marianna 

W. Palm Beach 

Cocoa 

GEORGIA (442) 

1 1 1 Signal Battalion, Army 4 4 2 Ft. Meade Washington 

* State Totals of Personnel. 
Mobilized Strength Duty Station Home Station 

IDAH O (663) 

1 29 Engineer Company, Dump Truck 

61 6 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

9 3 8 Engineer Company, Dump Truck 

1 3 9 Engineer Battalion, Combat 

145 Engineer Group, Combat HHC 

ILLINOIS (207) 

1 28 Ordnance Company, Field Supply 

3637 Ordnance Company, Direct Auto Support 

IOW A (67) 

1063 Aviation Company, Fixed Wing 

KANSA S (469) 

4 9 6 Ordnonce Group, Maint. & Supply HHD 

1 10 Ordnance Battalion, Ammunition HHD 

1 10 Ordnance Company, General Auto Support 

170 Ordnance Company, Ammunition 

250 Ordnance Company, Direct Auto Support 

KENTUCKY (1 148) 

2 Medium Tonk Battalion, 1 23 Armor 

413 Ordnance Company, General Support 

3 Medium Tank Battalion, 1 23 Armor 

LOUISIAN A (981) 

1 59 Evacuation Hospital 

362 8 Ordnance Company, Direct Auto Support 

7 6 9 Signal Battalion, Cable Construction 

415 Ordnonce Company, General Auto Support 

204 Transportation Group, Truck HHD 

MAIN E (476) 

2 Medium Tank Battalion, 2 0 Armor 

MASSACHUSETTS (865) 

664 Medical Detachment (OA) 

3 Howitzer Battalion, 21 1 Artillery 

1 Howitzer Battalion, 21 1 Artillery 1 55 M M 

102 Field Artillery Group, HHB 

MICHIGA N (506) 

156 Signal Battalion, Combat Area 

MISSISSIPPI (1394 ) 

148 Engineer Compony, Maint. Direct Support 

3 6 7 Ordnance Company, Direct Auto Support 

1 1 4 Military Police Company 

1065 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

1 56 Engineer Company, Lt. Equipment 

223 Engineer Battalion, Construction 

1 34 Surgical Hospital 

1 23 Medical Company, Air Ambulance 

134 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

MISSOURI (799) 

106 Ordnance Company, General Auto Support 

864 Medical Company, Ambulance 

2 0 4 Signal Battalion, Supply & Maintenance 

NEBRASK A (268) 

24 Medical Company, Air Ambulance 

105 7 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

105 6 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

57 

105 

6 2 

3 6 7 

7 2 

115 

9 2 

6 7 

5 7 

71 

126 

1 2 0 

9 5 

4 8 4 

1 4 2 

5 2 2 

1 4 5 

1 0 0 

5 5 8 

120 

58 

4 7 6 

6 

3 8 5 

4 0 2 

7 2 

5 0 6 

137 

83 

102 

7 7 

131 

6 3 0 

8 0 

7 9 

7 5 

104 

53 

6 4 2 

1 0 7 

8 7 

7 4 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. lewis 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. L. Wood 

Ft. Knox 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Bliss 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Stewart 

Ft. Stewart 

Ft. Knox 

Ft. Sill 

Ft. Sill 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Campbell 

Ft. Eustis 

Ft. Campbell 

Ft. Devens 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Benning 

Ft. Rocker 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Gordon 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Chaffee 

Ft. Knox 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Benning i 

Ft. Campbell I 

Ft. Bragg 1 

Ft. L. Wood 

Ft. Carson 

Ft. Sill 

Driggs 

Emmett 

Ashton 

Nampa 

Idaho Falls 

Quincy 

Springfield 

Waterloo 

Topeka 

Norton 

Manhattan 

Mankoto 

Marysville 

Owensboro 

Frankfort 

Bowling Green 

New Orleans 

Lafayette 

Baton Rouge 

Alexandria 

New Orleans 

Lewiston 

Pittsfield 

Fall River 

New Bedford 

Fall River 

Detroit 

Pascogoula 

Natchez 

Jackson 

Poplarville 

Yazoo City 

West Point 

Jackson 

Meridian 

Bay St. Louis 

De Soto 

St. Louis 

St. Louis 

Wahoo 

York 

Crete 
Unit Mobilized Strength Duty Station Home Station 

NEW HAMPSHIRE (1050) 

157 Signal Company, Construction 

4 Howitzer Battalion, 197 Artillery, 155 MM 

2 Howitzer Battalion, 172 Artillery, 8" Towed 

1 Howitzer Battalion, 172 Artillery 

NEW JERSEY (519) 

1 1 4 Surgical Hospital 

141 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

253 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

30 Ordnance Battalion, Maint. & Supply HHD 

I I 2 Field Artillery Group, HHB 

1 22 Ordnance Company, Direct Support 

NEW MEXICO (5) 

394 Signal Detachment, RQ 

NEW YORK (897) 

1 34 Ordnance Company, Direct Auto Support 

587 Transportation Company, Terminal Service 

105 Military Police Company 

101 Signal Battalion, Combat Area 

NORTH CAROLINA (4) 

1 23 Signal Detachment, RQ 

NORTH DAKOTA (790) 

81 8 Engineer Company, Dump Truck 

896 Engineer Company, Float Bridge 

769 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

164 Engineer Group, Combat HHC 

164 Engineer Battalion, Combat 

231 Medical Clearing Company 

OHIO (400) 

131 Medical Company, Collecting 

1 1 2 Ordnance Company, Direct Support 

3641 Ordnance Company, Direct Auto Support 

357 Ordnance Company, General Supply 

PENNSYLVANIA (527) 

165 Military Police Battalion 

131 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

9 0 

2 8 8 

3 2 2 

3 5 0 

98 

83 

7 9 

29 

102 

128 

Ft. Meade 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Dix 

Ft. Dix 

Ft. Campbell 

Ft. Bliss 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Chaffee 

Manches 

Keene 

Nashua 

Manches 

Paterson 

Orange 

Orange 

Camden 

Trenton 

Camden 

5 

8 7 

159 

106 

5 4 5 

4 

6 6 

113 

7 4 

65 

4 0 9 

63 

7 0 

1 2 7 

7 7 

126 

4 5 1 

7 6 

Tobyhana 

Ft. Dix 

Ft. Eustis 

Ft- Benning 

Ft. Devens 

Tobyhana 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. L. Wood 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Campbell 

Ft. Sill 

Ft. Knox 

Ft. Knox 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Polk 

Albuquerque 

Rochester 

Nesconset 

Utica 

Yonkers 

Wilmington 

Bottineau 

Bismarck 

Mott 

Bismarck 

Minot 

Grand Forks 

Xenia 

Newark 

Port Clinton 

Elyria 

Lehighton 

Wellsboro 

RHODE ISLAND (133) 

107 Signal Support 

SOUTH CAROLINA (213) 

1 1 1 Signal Company, Large Base 

108 Signal Battalion, Support HHD 

SOUTH DAKOTA (866) 

21 I Engineer Company, Panel Bridge 

740 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

741 Transportation Company, Lt. Truck 

214 Engineer Company, Dump Truck 

1 Howitzer Battalion, 147th Artillery 

730 Medical Clearing Company 

1 1 5 Signal Company, Support 

TEXAS (9896) 

136 Transportation Company, Med, Hcptr. 

49 Armored Division 

1 104 Transportation Company, Aircraft Hvy Maint. 

1 22 Transportation Company, Direct Support 

133 

182 

31 

8 7 

7 5 

78 

6 0 

3 3 8 

9 6 

1 3 2 

Ft. Sill 

Ft. Benning 

Ft. Stewart 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. Carson 

Ft. Carson 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Sill 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Riley 

Providence 

Greenville 

Greenwood 

lemmon 

Milbank 

Clear Lake 

Mobridge 

Sioux Falls 

Winner 

Yankton 

71 

9684 

79 

64 

Ft. Riley 

Ft. Polk 

Atlanta GD 

Ft. Hood 

Austin 

Dallas 

Carriio Springs 

Ellington 
Mobilized Strengt ngt h 

199 

5 1 0 

4 4 5 

125 

121 

7 9 

124 

4 4 

6 6 

119 

2 5 0 

103 

125 

5 5 

195 7 

130 

996 7 

3 2 2 

Duty Station 

Ft. L Wood 

Ft. Hood 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. Hood 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. Lewis 

Granite City 

Ft. Devens 

Ft. Devens 

Ft. Campbell 

Ft. Belvoir 

Ft. Bragg 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. Mead e 

Ft. Polk 

Ft. Lewis 

Ft. Lewis 

Hom e Station 

Ft. Douglas 

Ft. Douglas 

Murray 

Ft. Douglas 

Springville 

Salt Lake City 

Ft. Douglas 

Middlebury 

Proctor 

S. Burlington 

Richmond 

Fredericksburg 

Radford 

Cp. Murray 

St. Albans 

Point Pleasant 

Milwaukee 

Laramie 

UTA H (1603 ) 

144 Evacuation Hospital 

1 Target Acquisition Battalion, 14 0 Artillery 

1 ! 5 Engineer Battalion, Combat 

XI Corps Artillery, HHB 

1 1 6 Engineer Company, Lt. Equipment 

3659 Ordnance Company, Direct Auto Support 

1 1 5 Ordnance Company, Direct Support 

VERMON T (229) 

5B Engineer Battalion, Depot HHD 

45 Engineer Company, Dump Truck 

131 Engineer Company, Lt. Equipment 

VIRGINI A (478) 

2 Howitzer Battalion, 1 1 1 th Artillery 

189 Engineer Company, Float Bridge 

684 Signal Company, Support 

WASHINGTO N (55) 

1041 Transportation Company, Staging Area 

WEST VIRGINI A (2087 ) 

150 Armored Cavalry Regiment 

366 4 Ordnance Company, Direct Support 

WISCONSI N (9967 ) 

32 Infantry Division 

WYOMIN G (322) 

1022 Engineer Battalion, Combat 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

Personnel—1961 Mobilization 

There were 45,118 individuals assigned to the 

447 Army National Guard units at the time these 

units were alerted for entry on active duty. The 

mobilized strength of these units was 44,371, representing 98.3 percent of the on-board strength when 

alerted. The entry strength included 372 personnel, 

or .8 percent, who were granted temporary delays. 

The number of assigned personnel not mobilized totaled 2,647, but they were offset by 1,900 

men recruited between alert and mobilization for a 

net loss of 747, or 1.7 percent. Losses are categorized as follows: 

Reason Numbe r % of 

Strength 

Dependency 35 .07 

Hardship 133 .3 

Medical Disqualification 321 .7 

ETS prior to 1 Oct 61 43 5 1.0 

Transferred to ING or other units 84 4 1.9 

Critical Skill (DOD criteria) 2 0 .04 

Other (Enlisted in Regular Service, Change of 

Residence, Minority, Death, Accept 

Commission) 85 9 1.9 

Total Fall-Out 2,64 7 5.91 

The losses of 2,647 included 1,700 which occurred 

as normal attrition. 

The several States received a total of 1,558 

requests for delay or exemption. This represented 

only 3.5 percent of the alerted strength. These were 

carefully screened at unit and State level and final 

action was as indicated below: 

Reason 

Dependency 

Personal Hardship 

Community Hardship 

High School Students 

Other Students 

Medical 

Occupation 

Sole Survivor 

Conscientious Objector 

School Teacher 

Approve d 

Requests Dela y Exemption 

9 9 

7 6 5 

178 

231 

1 2 7 

67 

8 6 

1 

2 

2 

2 0 2 

4 0 

7 6 

31 

23 

35 

123 

10 

153 

33 

4 4 

21 

1 

1 

Disapprove d 

64 

4 4 0 

1 2 8 

2 

63 

6 5 

1 

2 

Totals 1,558 37 2 42 1 76 5 

Total approved delays and exemptions represented 

1.8 percent of the alerted strength. 

The entry strengths of units during this mobilization reflect considerable improvement over the 

Korean mobilization. The net fall-out at that time 

was 10.1 percent (14,049) as compared to 1.7 percent (747) this time. 107 
MOBILIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD UNITS 

Total Mobilized Strength: 21,067 

Home Station 

Mobilixed 

Strength Duty Station 

Hq, 1)7 Tac Recon Wg 

1 06 Tac Recon Sq 

117 A&E Maint Sq 

117 CAMRON 

117 Air Base Gp, Hq 

1 1 7 Supply Sq 

I 1 7 Transp Sq 

I I 7 Air Police Sq 

117 Civil Eng Sq 

1 17 Opns Sq 

117 Tac Hosp 

1 17 Recon Technical Sq 

1 60 Tac Recon Sq 

Hq, 161 Ftr Gp 

197 Ftr Intcp Sq 

1 61 Air Base Sq 

161 Materiel Sq 

161 CAMRON 

161 USAF Disp 

1 84 Tac Recon Sq 

Hq, 146 Air Transp Wg 

146 Air Transp Gp, Hq 

146 Aeromed Evac Sq 

1 1 5 Air Transp Sq 

1 1 5 Aeromed Evac Fit 

1 95 Air Transp Sq 

195 Aeromed Evac Fit 

146 Air Base Sq 

146 CAMRON 

146 USAF Disp 

195 Wea Fit 

1 20 Tac Ftr Sq 

103 AC&W Sq 

Hq, 113 Tac Ftr Wg 

121 Tac Ftr Sq 

1 13 A&E Maint Sq 

113 CAMRON 

1 13 Air Base Gp, Hq 

113 Supply Sq 

1 13 Transp Sq 

1 1 3 Air Police Sq 

1 1 3 Civil Eng Sq 

1 13 Oper Sq 

1 1 3 Tac Hosp 

121 Wea Fit 

1 69 Tac Ftr 

1 70 Tac Ftr Sq 

' State total mobilized strength. 

Birmingham MAP 

Donnelly Fid, Montgomery 

ALABAMA (1,413)* 

104 

100 

62 

109 

133 

109 

53 

56 

84 

58 

38 

101 

406 

Dreux AB, France 

Phoenix-Sky Harbor MAP 

Ft Smith MAP 

Van Nuys AP, L.A. 

ARIZONA (705) 

106 

48 

90 

170 

263 

28 

ARKANSAS (406) 

406 

CALIFORNIA (1,168) 

69 

138 

12 

68 

13 

94 

12 

360 

324 

45 

COLORADO (526 13 ) 

Buckley ANG Base, Denver 526 

CONNECTICUT (220) 

Milford Pt Armory, Milford 

& Trumbull Fid, Groton 

2 2 0 

F-104 

Donnelly Fid, Montgomery 

Phoenix-Sky Harbor MAP 

Ramstein AB, Germany 

Phoenix-Sky Harbor MAP 

Ft Smith MAP 

Van Nuys AP, L.A. 

C-97 

C-97 

F-100C 

F-84F 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (820) 

F-100C 

Andrews AFB, Md 

" " M 

M 

il 

" 

» M 

U 

U 

N 

Greater Peoria 

Capitol AP, Sp 

AP 

ingfield 

6 4 

100 

7 2 

9 4 

110 

1 1 7 

4 8 

41 

88 

4 5 

2 6 

15 

ILLINOIS (987) 

4 8 1 

5 0 6 

Buckley ANG Base, Denver 

Mannheim, Germany 

Andrews AFB, Md 

Greater Peoria AP 

Capitol AP, Springfield 
Home Station 

Mobiliied 

Strength Aircraft Duty Station 

Hq, 122Tac Ftr Wg 

1 63 Tac Ftr Sq 

1 22 A&E Mo.nl Sq 

1 22 CAMRON 

122 Air Base Gp, Hq 

1 22 Supply Sq 

1 22 Transp Sq 

1 22 Air Police Sq 

1 22 Civil Eng Sq 

I 22 Opns Sq 

122 Tac Hosp 

I I 3 Tac Ftr Sq 

113 Wea Fit 

163 Wea Fit 

Boer Fid, Ft Wayne 

Hulman Fid, Terre Haute 

Baer Fid, Ft Wayne 

INDIANA (1,367) 

60 

86 

55 

100 

104 

92 

53 

41 

71 

61 

23 

597 

9 

15 

Chambley, France 

Hulman Fid, Terre Haute 

Chambley, France 

Hq, 102 Tac Ftr Wg 

101 Tac Ftr Sq 

102 A&E Maint Sq 

102 CAMRON 

1 02 Air Police Sq 

102 Civil Eng Sq 

102 Supply Sq 

102 Tac Hosp 

131 Tac Ftr Sq 

102 Air Base Grp, Hq 

102 Opns Sq 

102 Trans Sq 

101 AC&W Fit 

101 Wea Fit 

131 Wea Fit 

Logan Intl AP, Boston 

Westfld-Bornes AP 

Worcester ANG Base, Skyline Dr 

Logan Intl AP, Boston 

Barnes AP, Westfleld 

MASSACHUSETTS (1,706) 

48 

95 

62 

125 

32 

171 

110 

32 

274 

367 

61 

49 

255 

13 

12 

Pholsbourg AB, France 

F-86H 

Mannheim, Germany 

Logan Intl AP, Boston 

Pholsbourg AB, France 

Hq, 1 33 Air Transp Wg 

133 Air Transp Gp, Hq 

1 33 Aeromed Evac Sq 

1 09 Air Trans Sq 

109 Aerom Evac Fit 

133 Air Base Sq 

133 CAMRON 

133 USAF Disp 

Minn-St Paul Intl AP 

MINNESOTA (127) 

65 

105 

11 

101 

33 

285 

191 

36 

Minn-St Paul Intl AP 

1 53 Tac Recon Sq Key Field, Meridian 

MISSISSIPPI (410) 

410 Key Field, Meridian 

Hq, 131 Tac Ftr Wg 

1 10 Tac Ftr Sq 

131 A&E Maint Sq 

131 CAMRON 

131 Air Base Gp, Hq 

I 31 Supply Sq 

1 31 Transp Sq 

131 Air Police Sq 

1 31 Civil Eng Sq 

131 Opns Sq 

1 31 Tac Hosp 

Lambert-St Louis MAP 

MISSOURI (827) 

81 

85 

57 

108 

138 

105 

57 

36 

72 

61 

31 

F-84F 

Toul-Rosieres A8, France 

Toul-Rosieres AB, France 

Lambert-St Louis MAP 

157 Air Transp Gp, Hq 

1 33 Air Transp Sq 

1 33 Aeromed Evac Fit 

1 57 Air Base Sq 

1 57 CAMRON 

157 USAF Disp 

NEW HAMPSHIRE (668! 

Grenier Fid, Manchester 90 

99 

20 

242 

195 

22 

C-97 

Grenier Fid, Manchester 
Unit 

Mobilized 

Home Station Strength Aircraft Duty Station 

Hq, 108 Tac Ftr Wg 

141 Tac Ftr Sq 

108 A&E Main! Sq 

108 CAMRON 

108 Air Base Gp 

1 08 Supply Sq 

1 08 Transp, Sq 

1 08 Air Police Sq 

108 Civil Eng Sq 

108 Oper Sq 

108 Tac Hosp 

1 1 9 Tac Ftr Sq 

McGuire AFB, N.J. 

NEW JERSEY (1,204) 

77 

82 

61 

82 

137 

96 

45 

34 

60 

58 

32 

440 

Chaumont AB, France 

F-84F Atlantic City NAFEC 

NEW YORK (2,292) 

1 36 Tac Ftr 

1 38 Tac Ftr Sq 

Hq, 1 52 Toe Control Gp 

1 06 Tac Control Sq 

Hq, 109 Air Transp Gp 

1 39 Air Transp Sq 

139 Aeromed Evac Fit 

109 Air Base Sq 

109 CAMRON 

109 USAF Disp 

108 AC&W Fit 

1 1 2 Tac Ftr Sq 

Hq, 121 Tac Ftr Wg 

1 66 Tac Fir Sq 

121 A&E Maint Sq 

121 CAMRON 

121 Air Base Gp, Hq 

121 Supply Sq 

1 21 Transp Sq 

121 Air Police Sq 

121 Civil Eng Sq 

121 Opns Sq 

121 Tac Hosp 

162 Tac Ftr Sq 

1 64 Tac Ftr Sq 

123 AC&W Fit 

1 64 Wea Fit 

Niagara Falls MAP 

Hancock AP, Syracuse 

Roslyn ANG Station 

Schenectady Cty AP 

Hancock AP, Syracuse 

Toledo Express AP 

Lockbourne AFB, Columbus 

Springfield MAP 

Mansfield MAP 

Blue Ash 

Mansfield MAP 

4 6 4 

6 0 6 

7 8 

2 4 9 

7 7 

9 2 

7 

231 

2 0 2 

3 0 

2 5 6 

OHIO (2,819) 

4 7 1 

7 2 

36 

5 0 

9 9 

126 

104 

5 0 0 

33 

6 7 

52 

31 

4 6 4 

471 

2 2 8 

15 

F-100C 

F-86H 

C-97 

F-84F 

F-84F 

F-84F 

F-84F 

Niagara Foils MAP 

Phalsbourg AB, France 

Mannheim, Germany 

" Schenectady Cty AP 

M 

" " " " Gutersloh, Germany 

Toledo Express AP 

Etain AB, France 

" " i i 

i i 

i t 

" " 

" " " Springfield MAP 

Mansfield MAP 

Landshut, Germany 

Etain AB, France 

OKLAHOMA (702) 

110 

Hq, 138 Air Transp Gp 

1 25 Air Transp Sq 

1 25 Aeromed Evac Fit 

138 Air Base Sq 

138 CAMRON 

138 USAF Disp 

125 Wea Fit 

1 1 2 AC&W Fit 

102 AC&W Sq 

Hq, 1 69 Ftr Gp 

1 57 Ftr Intcp Sq 

169 CAMRON 

169 Air Base Sq 

169 Materiel Sq 

169 USAF Disp 

Tulsa MAP 

« 

u 

State College, Pa. 

Cranston, R.I. 

McEntire ANG Bose, 

Columbia, S.C. 

u 

« 

105 

98 

34 

241 

185 

25 

14 

PENNSYLVANIA (256) 

2 5 6 

RHODE ISLAND (254) 

SOUTH 

2 5 4 

CAROLINA (71 

101 

48 

283 

94 

164 

23 

C-97 

Beuchel, Germany 

9 

F-io4 ^—y 

Celie, Germany 

McEntire ANG Base, Columbia 

Ramstein AB, Germany 

McEntire ANG Base, Columbia 
Unit 

134 Fir Gp 

134 Materiel Sq 

1 34 Air Base Sq 

134 USAF Disp 

134 CAMRON 

131 Ftr Intcp Sq 

1 49 Tac Ftr Sq 

Mobilized 

Hom e Station Strength 

TENNESSEE (693 ) 

McGe e Tyson AP, Knoxville 8 9 

1 7 6 

9 5 

31 

261 

41 

VIRGINI A (412 ) 

Byrd Fid, Sandston 48 2 

Aircraft 

F-10 4 

F-84F 

Duly Station 

McGhee Tyion AP, Knoxville 

Ramstein AB, Germany 

Byrd Fid, Sandston 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD 

Personnel—1961 Mobilization 

The assigned strength of the 163 units of the 

Air National Guard alerted and called to active duty 

was 21,094. The mobilized strength of these units 

was 21,067, including 2.T570 officers, 92 warrant 

officers, and 18,305 airmen. The number of personnel mobilized was 29.8 percent of the total Air 

National Guard strength and was 99.97 percent of 

the alerted on-board strength. The entry strength 

included 39 Air Guardsmen, who were granted temporary delays. The number of assigned personnel not 

mobilized totaled 134. Requests for release or delay 

and action taken are shown in the tables below. 

Action 

% of alerted 

strength 

Delays 

Requested 

Approved 

Releases 

Requested 

Approved 

107 

39 

591 

134 

.0050 

.0018 

.028 

.006 

Break-out of Releases 

Type 

Occupation 

(Including financial) 

Student 

Compassionate 

Community hardship 

Other 

Total 

Requested 

2 8 3 

51 

1 9 7 

19 

41 

591 

Approve d 

23 

7 

7 7 

3 

24 

134 

The above tables reflect considerable improvement in the fall-out for the Berlin crisis mobilization 

as compared to the Korean mobilization. 

Overseas Locations of Mobilized Air National Guard Units Shown on Following Page 
Overseas Locations of Air National Guard Units 

ETAIN 

111 TFW OHIO 

1«8 TFS 

CHAMBLEY 

122 TFW IND 

163 TFS 

TOUL ROSIERE5 

131 TFW MO 

110 TFS 

DREUX 

117 TRW ALA ( 

1M TRS 

CHAUMONT 

108 TFW N. J 

141 TFS 

112 TFW = Tactical Fighter Wins 

TFS zz Tactical Fighter Squadron 

FIS = Fighter Interceptor Squadron 

TCG = Tactical Control Group 

TCS = Tactical Control Squadron 

AC&W = Aircraft Control & Warning Squadron 
In the event of a nuclear holocaust 

the United States would be, for a time, without adequate communications and the effectiveness of our national authority would be 

impaired. Millions of Americans would be 

killed or injured. The Nation's survival m ight 

then very well depend on strong State controls, and the availability to each Governor 

of an effective military force—the National 

Guard. 

The following map section shows 

the State by State dispersal of the National 

Guard, Army and Air, in over 2,600 communities throughout the fifty States, the 

District of Columbia and Puerto Rjco. The 

National Guard is both a Federal and State 

force, and its State mission—to act under 

competent orders of State authorities io the 

protection of life and property, and the preservation of peace, order, and public sa fety 

—assumes vastly increased importance in 

this atomic age. 

Wit h widely dispersed units with 

their vital equipment, the National Guard 

could not be seriously impaired by enemy 

action. As a disciplined military force which 

is experienced in recovery operations following natural disaster, the National Guard 

would assist the State and local civilian authorities to reestablish law and order and 

organize relief measures. Such Civil Defense 

support would be second only to their primary military mission in defensive and offensive military operations. 

The National Guard has the facili-. 

ties—the units—the individuals—the training 

—and the equipment to render such service 

to State and Nation. It can provide emergency communications—medical care—field 

hospitals—evacuation of casualties—road 

clearance and bridge repair—field kitchens 

for emergency feeding—and it has a variety 

of transportation, both ground and airborne 

—all vital to the Nation's survival. 

The over 5,000 units of the National 

Guard, with their Federal, State and local 

character, stand preeminently ready for both 

civilian recovery and military retaliation. 
Alabama 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Butler 

2. Camden 

3. Chotom 

4. Chickasaw 

5. Citronelle 

6. Creighton 

7. Demopolis 

8. Grove Hill 

9. Jackson 

10. Linden 

11. Mobile 

12. Monroeville 

13. Prichard 

14. Spring Hill 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Andalusia 

2. Atmore 

3. Bay Minette 

4. Brantley 

5. Brewton 

6. Brundidge 

7. Evergreen 

8. Fairhope 

9. Florala 

10. Foley 

11. Fort Deposit 

12. Georgiana 

13. Greenville 

14. Luverne 

15. Montgomery 

16. Op p 

17. Ramer 

18. Robertson 

19. Troy 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

DISTRICT 

Abbeville 

Ashfard 

Auburn 

Clayton 

Dothan 

Elba 

Enterprise 

Eufaula 

Geneva 

Hartford 

Headland 

New Brockton 

Opelika 

Ozark 

Phoenix City 

Samson 

Slocomb 

Tuskegee 

Union Springs 

4TH D 

1. 

2. 

3 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

Anniston 

Ashland 

Ashville 

Childersburg 

Goodwater 

Jacksonville 

Lineville 

Oxford 

Pell City 

Piedmont 

Prattville 

Selma 

Springville 

Sylacaugo 

Talladega 

Tallassee 

Wetumpko 

«-^3-S= 

STH D 

1. 

2 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

Albertville 

Alexander City 

Arab 

Attalia 

Boaz 

Centre 

Collinsville 

Dadeville 

Fort Payne 

Gadsden 

Gunthersville 

Heflin 

Langdale 

Roanoke 

Vc lley Head 

f 

6TH D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

Calera 

Centerville 

Clayton 

Eutow 

Greensboro 

Holt 

Livingston 

Marion 

Northport 

Tuscaloosa 

Vincent 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Aliceville 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

Berry 

Carbon Hill 

Cordova 

Cullman 

Dora 

Double Springs 

Fayette 

Guin 

Haleyville 

Hamilton 

Hanceville 

Jasper 

Oneonta 

Reform 

Russellville 

Sulligent 

Vernon 

Winfield 

STH DISTRICT 

1. Athens 

2. Bridgeport 

3. Decatur 

4. Florence 

5. Hartselle 

6. Huntsville 

7. Moulton 

8. Scottsboro 

8. Sheffield 

10. Tuscumbia 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Bessemer 

2. Birmingham 

3. Ensley 

4. Fairfield 

5. Graysville 

6. Homewood 

7. Hosp 

8. Leeds 

9. Norwood 

10. Warrior 

11. Wylam 
NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

AT LARGE 

1. Akiachak 18. Homer 35. Mountain Village 52. Sitka 

2. Akiak 19. Hooper Bay 36. Napakiak 53. St. Paul 

3. Alakanuk 20. Juneau 37. Napaskiak 54. St. Michael 

4. Anchorage 21. Kasigluk 38. Newktok 55. Stebbins 

5. Barrow 22. Ketchikan 39. Nightmute 56. Teller 

6. Barter Island 23. Kiana 40. Noatak 57. Teller Mission 

7. Bethel 24. King Island 41. Nome 58. Togiak 

8. Chevak 25. Kipnuk 42. Noorvik 59. Tuluksak 

9. Chifornak 26. Kivolina 43. Point Hope 60. Tuntutuliak 

10. Deering 27. Kodiak 44. Quinhagak 61. Tununak 

11. Dillingham 28. Kotzebue 45. Savoonga 62. Unalakleet 

12. Eek 29. Koyuk 46. Scammon Bay 63. Unalaska 

13. Elim 30. Kwethluk 47. Selawik 64. Wainwright 

14. Fairbanks 31. Kwiguk 48. Seward 65. Wales 

15. Fort Yukon 32. Kwillingok 49. Shaktoolik 66. White Mountain 

16. Gamble 33. Little Diomede 50. Shishmaref 

17. Haines 34. Mekoryuk 51. Shungnak 
Arizona 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Chandler 

2. Glendale 

3. Mesa 

4. Phoenix 

5. Tempe 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

DISTRICT 

Bisbee 

Casa Grande 

Coolidge 

Douglas 

Nogales 

Tucson 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

DISTRICT 

Flagstaff 

Globe 

Kingman 

Prescott 

Safford 

Winslow 
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Blytheville 

2. Forrest City 

3. Harrisburg 

4. Helena 

5. Jonesboro 

6. Marianna 

7. Marked Tree 

8. Paragould 

9. Piggott 

10. Rector 

11. West Helena 

12. West Memphis 

13. Wynne 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Augusta 

2. Batesville 

3. Beebe 

4. Brinkley 

5. Hazen 

6. Heber Springs 

7. Newport 

8. Searcy 

9. Walnut Ridge 

COMMUNITIES 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

DISTRICT 

Bentonville 

Berryville 

Booneville 

Charleston 

Clarksville 

Fayefteville 

Fort Smith 

Harrison 

Lincoln 

Marshall 

Mountain Home 

Ozark 

Paris 

Rogers 

Siloam Springs 

Springdale 

Van Buren 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Arkadelphia 

2. Camden 

3. Crossett 

4. DeQueen 

5. El Dorado 

6. Hope 

7. Magnolia 

8. Mena 

9. Prescott 

10. Texarkana 

11. Warren 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Conway 

2. Danville 

3. Dardanelle 

4. Little Rock 

5. Morrilton 

6. North Little Rock 

7. Perryville 

8. Russellville 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Benton 

2. Dermott 

3. De Witt 

4. Dumas 

5. Fordyce 

6. Hot Springs 

7. Lake Village 

8. Lonoke 

9. Malvern 

10. McGehee 

11. Monticello 

12. Pine Bluff 

13. Sheridan 

14. Stuttgart 
California 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD 

COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Eureka 

2. Healdsburg 

3. Napa 

4. Petalumo 

5. San Rafael 

6. Santa Rosa 

2 0 DISTRICT 

1. Auburn 

2. Chico 

3. Columbia 

4. Mt. Shasta 

5. Nevada City 

6. Oroville 

7. Placervtlle 

8. Quincy 

9. Red Bluff 

10. Redding 

11. Roseville 

12. Susanville 

13. Yreka 

3D DISTRICT 

1. No. Highlands 

2. No. Sacramento 

3. Sacramento 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Bencicia 

2. Vallejo 

3. Willows 

4. Woodland 

5. Yuba City 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. San Francisco 

6TH DISTRICT 

1, San Francisco 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Berkeley 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Alameda 

2. San Lorenzo 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Fremont 

2. Hayward 

3. Newark 

4. San Jose 

10th DISTRICT 

1. Gtlroy 

2. Sunnyvale 

11 TH DISTRICT 

1. Menlo Park 

2. Redwood City 

3. San Bruno 

4. San Mateo 

12TH DISTRICT 

1. Atascadero 

2. Holliiter 

3. Monterey 

4. Salinas 

5. San Luis Obispo 

6. San Miguel 

7. Santa Cruz 

8. Watsonville 

13TH DISTRICT 

1. Oxnard 

2. Santa Barbara 

3. Santa Maria 

4. Ventura 

14TH DISTRICT 

1. Concord 

2. El Cerrito 

3. Pittsburg 

4. Richmond 

5. Walnut Creek 

36,37 

15TH DISTRICT 

1. Lodi 

2. Modesto 

3. Oakdale 

4. Stockton 

5. Tracy 

6. Turlock 

16TH DISTRICT 

1. Freson 

2. Madera 

3. Merced 

4. Reedley 

17TH DISTRICT 

1. Gardena 

2. San Pedro 

3. Torrance 

18TH DISTRICT 

1. Bakersfield 

2. Delono 

3. Hanford 

4. Porterville 

5. Tulare 

6. Visalia 

19TH DISTRICT 

1. Montebello 

20TH DISTRICT 

1. Glendale 

2. Pasadena 

21ST niSTRICT 

None 

22ND DISTRICT 

1. Canoga Pork 

2. San Fernando 

3. Van Nuys 

23RD DISTRICT 

1. Bell 

2. Ccmpton 

3. lyrtwood 

24TH DISTRICT 

1. Arcadia 

2. Azusa 

3. Los Angeles 

4. Monrovia 

5. Pomona 

25TH DISTRICT 

1. El Monte 

26TH DISTRICT 

1. Culver City 

27TH DISTRICT 

1. Burbank 

2. Lancaster 

3. Los Angeles 

4. Sar Fernando 

28TH DISTRICT 

1. Los Angeles 

2. Manhattan Beach 

3. Playa Del Rey 

29TH DISTRICT 

None 

30TH DISTRICT 

None 

31ST DISTRICT 

1. Inglewood 

2. Los Angeles 

(Exposition Blvd) 

32D DISTRICT 

1. Long Beach 

3 3 0 DISTRICT 

1. Apple Valley 

2. Barstow 

3. Colton 

4. Fort Irwin 

5. Ontario 

6. Redlands 

7. San Bernardino 

34TH DISTRICT 

None 

35TH DISTRICT 

1. Escondido 

2. Fullerton 

3. Orange 

4. Santa Ana 

5. Vista 

36TH DISTRICT 

1. Coronado 

2. El Cajon 

3. San Diego 

37TH DISTRICT 

1. National City 

38TH DISTRICT 

1. Banning 

2. Brawley 

3. Calexico 

4. Corona 

5. El Centra 

6. Hemet 

7. Indio 

8. Riverside 
Colorado 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Denver 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Boulder 

2. Burlington 

3. Englewood 

4. Ft. Collins 

5. Ft. Morgan 

6. Golden 

7. Greeley 

8. Longmont 

9. Sterling 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Alamosa 

2. Canon City 

3. Colorado Springs 

4. La Junta 

5. Lamar 

6. Las Animas 

7. Monte Vista 

8. Peublo 

9. Trinidad 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Cortez 

2. Craig 

3. Durango 

4. Grand Junction 

5. Montrose 
Connecticut 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Avon 

2. Bristol 

3. Hartford 

4. Manchester 

5. New Britain 

6. Simsbury 

7. Southington 

8. Thomasonville 

9. West Hartford 

10. Windsor Locks 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

DISTRICT 

Danielson 

Middletown 

Mystic 

New London 

Norwich 

Portland 

Putnam 

Rockville 

Westbrook 

Willimantic 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

DISTRICT 

Branford 

Meriden 

Milford 

Milford Point 

New Haven 

Wallingford 

West Haven 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Danbury 

2. Greenwich 

3. Norwalk 

4. Stamford 

5. Stratford 

6. Westport 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Ansonia 

2. Naugatuck 

3. Torrington 

4. Waterbury 

Delaware 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

At Large 

1. Dagsboro 

2. Dover 

3. Georgetown 

4. Harrington 

5. Laurel 

6. Lewes 

7. Marshallton 

8. Middletown 

9. Milford 

10. New Castle 

11. Seaford 

12. Smyrna 

13. Wilmington 
Florida 

8 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

12 

4 

*'*" " 

NATIONAL GUARD 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Bonifay 

2. Chipley 

3. Crestview 

4. DeFuniak Springs 

5. Panama City 

6. Pensacola 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Jacksonville 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Miami 

2. No. Miami 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Homestead 

COMMUNITIES 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Dade City 

2. Daytona Beach 

3. Deland 

4. Eustis 

5. Leesburg 

6. Oca la 

7. Sanford 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Belle Glade 

2. Ft. Lauderdale 

3. Fort Myers 

4. Hollywood 

5. W. Palm Beach 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Arcadia 

2. Avon Park 

3. Bartow 

4. Bradenton 

5. Haines City 

6. Lake Wales 

7. Palmetto 

8. Sarasota 

9. Winter Haven 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Camp Blanding 

2. Gainesville 

3. Lake City 

4. Palatka 

5. St. Augustine 

6. Starke 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Apalachicola 

2. Live Oak 

3. Quincy 

4. Tallahassee 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Lakeland 

2. Plant City 

3. Tampa 

11TH DISTRICT 

1. Cocoa 

2. Fort Pierce 

3. Orlando 
Georgia 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

Glenville 

Hinesville 

Lyons 

Reidsville 

Savannah 

Springfield 

Statesboro 

Swainsboro 

Waynesboro 

DISTRICT 

Albany 

Bainbridge 

Camilla 

Moultrie 

Quitman 

Thomasville 

Tifton 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

DISTRICT 

Americus 

Columbus 

Cordele 

Dawson 

Eastman 

Fitzgerald 

Hawkinsvillf 

Montezuma 

Perry 

Reynolds 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

Covington 

Griffin 

Jackson 

LaGrange 

Newnan 

Thomaston 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Atlanta 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Dublin 

2. Eatonton 

3. Forsyth 

4. Louisville 

5. Macon 

6. Milledgeville 

7. Sandersville 

8. Sparta 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Calhoun 

2. Cedartown 

3. Dalton 

4. Douglasville 

5. Marietta 

6. Rome 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Baxley 

2. Brunswick 

3. Douglas 

4. Jesup 

5. Valdosta 

6. Waycross 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Canton 

2. Gainesville 

3. Lawrencevilli 

4. Toccoa 

5. Winder 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Augusta 

2. Elberton 

3. Hartwell 

4. Lavonia 

5. Monroe 

6. Thomson 

7. Washington 
& o 

KAUAI 

OAHU 

HAWAII 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

At Large 

1. Ewa, Oahu 

2. Fort Ruger 

3. Hanapepe, Kauai 

4. Hilo 

5. Honokaa 

6. Honomu 

7. Honolulu 

8. Kahuku, Oahu 

9. Kahului, Maui 

10. Kapaa, Kauai 

11. Kaunakakai, 

Molokai 

12. Kealakekua 

13. Kekaha, Kauai 

14. Kohala 

15. Kokee AFS, 

Kauai 

16. Koko Head, 

Honolulu 

17. Lahaina, Maui 

18. Laupahoehoe 

19. Lihue, Kauai 

20. Olaa 

2 1 . Pahala 

22. Wahiawa, Oahu 

23. Waialua 

24. Wailuku, Maui 

25. Waimanalo 

Idaho 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Bonners Ferry 

2. Caldwell 

3. Coeur D'Alene 

4. Emmett 

5. Grangeville 

6. Hailey 

7. Lewiston 

8. Moscow 

9. Orofmo 

10. Payette 

11. Weiser 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Ashton 

2. Blackfoot 

3. Boise 

4. Buhl 

5. Burley 

6. Driggs 

7. Gooding 

8. Homedale 

9. Idaho Falls 

10. Jerome 

11. Nampa 

12. Pocatello 

13. Preston 

14. Rexburg 

15. Rigby 

16. Rupert 

17. St. Anthony 

18. Twin Falls 
Illinois 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Chicago 

2D DISTRICT 

None 

3RD DISTRICT 

None 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Chicago 

2. Orland Park 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Chicago 

6TH DISTRICT 

None 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Chicago 

8TH DISTRICT 

None 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Chicago 

10TH DISTRICT 

None 

11TH DISTRICT 

1. Park Ridge 

12TH DISTRICT 

1. Chicago 

13TH DISTRICT 

1. Fort Sheridan 

2. Mundelein 

3. Palatine 

4. Waukegan 

14TH DISTRICT 

1. Aurora 

2. Elgin 

3. Naperville 

4. Woodstock 

15TH DISTRICT 

1. Joliet 

2. Ottawa 

3. Streator 

4. Sycamore 

16TH DISTRICT 

1. Dixon 

2. Freeport 

3. Rock Falls 

4. Rockford 

17TH DISTRICT 

1. Bloomington 

2. Danville 

3. Kankakee 

4. Pontiac 

18TH DISTRICT 

1. Delavan 

2. Peoria 

19TH DISTRICT 

1. Galesburg 

2. Galva 

3. Kewanee 

4. Monmouth 

5. Rock Island 

20TH DISTRICT 

1. Macomb 

2. Quincy 

21 ST DISTRICT 

1. Effingham 

2. Paris 

3. Springfield 

22D DISTRICT 

1. Champaign 

2. Decatur 

3. Mattoon 

4. Sullivan 

5. Urbana 

23D DISTRICT 

1. Lowrenceville 

2. Litchfield 

3. Mt. Vernon 

4. Salem 

24TH DISTRICT 

1. E. St. Louis 

25TH DISTRICT 

1. Cairo 

2. Carbondale 

3. West Frankfort 
3 

• • • 

5 . 

• • • • 

11 

9

 • 

— i 

10 

Indiana 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Gary 

2. Hammond 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Boswell 

2. Delphi 

3. Lafayette 

4. Logansport 

5. Monticello 

6. Remington 

7. Rensselaer 

8. Valparaiso 

9. Warsaw 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Elkhart 

2. Goshen 

3. La Porte 

4. Plymouth 

5. South Bend 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Angola 

2. Bluffton 

3. Fort Wayne 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Alexandria 

2. Anderson 

3. Elwood 

4. Frankfort 

5. Hartford City 

6. Huntington 

7. Kempton 

8. Kokomo 

9. Marion 

10. Peru 

11. Portland 

12. Tipton 

13. Wabash 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Attica 

2. Crawfordsville 

3. Danville 

4. Darlington 

5. Greencastle 

6. Lebanon 

7. Noblesville 

8. Rockville 

9. Terre Haute 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Bloomington 

2. Brazil 

3. Linton 

4. Martinsville 

5. Princeton 

6. Spencer 

7. Vincennes 

8. Washington 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Evansville 

2. Jasper 

3. Mount Vernon 

4. New Albany 

5. Tell City 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Bedford 

2. Columbus 

3. Madison 

4. North Vernon 

5. Salem 

6. Scottsburg 

7. Seymour 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Connersville 

2. Greenfield 

3. Greensburg 

4. Muncie 

5. New Castle 

6. Richmond 

7. Shelbyville 

8. Winchester 

11TH DISTRICT 

1. Indianapolis 
Iowa 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1S1 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6 

7. 

8. 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

DISTRICT 

Burlington 

Davenport 

Fairfield 

Iowa City 

Keokuk 

Mt. Pleasant 

Muscatine 

Washington 

DISTRICT 

Cedar Rapids 

Clinton 

Dubuque 

Oelwein 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

DISTRICT 

Cedar Falls 

Charles City 

Eagle Grove 

Hampton 

Iowa Falls 

Mason City 

Waterloo 

Webster City 

4TH 1 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

Centerville 

Chariton 

Knoxville 

Marshalltown 

Newton 

Oskaloosa 

Ottumwa 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Boone 

2. Camp Dodge 

3. Des Moines 

4. Ft. Dodge 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Algona 

3. Estherville 

4. Humboldt 

5. Ida Grove 

6. Le Mars 

7. Sheldon 

8. Sioux City 

9. Spencer 

10. Storm Lake 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

Atlantic 

Audubon 

Clarinda 

Corning 

Council Bluffs 

Denison 

Glenwood 

Jefferson 

Mapleton 

Perry 

Red Oak 

Shenandoah 

Villisca 
Kansas 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Belleville 

2. Beloit 

3. Colby 

4. Concordia 

5. Dodge City 

6. Ellsworth 

7. Garden City 

8. Great Bend 

9. Harper 

10. Hays 

11. Hutchinson 

12. Kingman 

13. Larned 

14. Liberal 

15. Mankato 

16. Medicine Lodge 

17. Norton 

18. Phillipsburg 

19. Pratt 

20. Russell 

2 1. Salina 

22. Smith Center 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Atchinson 

2. Clay Center 

3. Hiawatha 

4. Holton 

5. Horton 

6. Junction City 

7. Leavenworth 

8. Manhattan 

9. Marysville 

10. Sabetha 

11. St. Marys 

12. Topeka 

13. Troy 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

DISTRICT 

Garnett 

Kansas City 

Lawrence 

Ottawa 

Paola 

Pleasanton 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Abilene 

2. Council Grove 

3. McPherson 

4. Newton 

5. Wichita 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Arkansas City 

2. Augusta 

3. Burlington 

4. Chanute 

5. Cherryvalle 

6. Coffeyville 

7. Emporia 

8. Eureka 

9. Fort Scott 

10. Fredonia 

11. lola 

12. Neodesha 

13. Pittsburg 

14. Wellington 

15. Winfield 

16. Yates Center 
Kentucky 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

DISTRICT 

Hopkinsville 

Marion 

Paducah 

Russellville 

DISTRICT 

Bowling Green 

Glasgow 

Henderson 

Livermore 

Madisonville 

Owensboro 

3D 

1. 

DISTRICT 

Louisville 

4TH I 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

Bardstown 

Campbellsville 

Elizabethtown 

Harrodsburg 

Springfield 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

Barbourville 

Harlan 

London 

Middlesboro 

Monticello 

Ravenna 

Somerset 

Tompkinsville 

Williamsburg 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Carlisle 

2. Danville 

3. Frankfort 

4. Lexington 

5. Richmond 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Ashland 

2. Jackson 

3. Olive Hill 
• • 

J 

8 

Louisiana 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

- ^ 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Homer 

2. Minden 

3. Shreveport 

4. Vivian 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Bastrop 

2. Jonesboro 

3. Monroe 

4. Ruston 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. 

2D 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

New Orleans 

DISTRICT 

None 

DISTRICT 

Abbeville 

Breaux Bridge 

Franklin 

Houma 

Jeanerette 

Lafayette 

Morgan City 

New Iberia 

St. Martinville 

Thibodaux 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Baton Rouge 

2. Bogalusa 

3. Covington 

4. Donaldsonville 

5. Fronklinton 

6. Hammond 

7. New Roads 

8. Plaquemine 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Crowley 

2. De Quincy 

3. Eunice 

4. Jennings 

5. Lake Charles 

6. Opelousas 

7. Ville Platte 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Alexandria 

2. Jena 

3. Leesville 

4. Many 

5. Marksville 

6. Natchitoches 

7. Winnfield 
Maine 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Bangor 

2. Belfast 

3. Calais 

4. Caribou 

5. Fort Fairfield 

6. Fort Kent 

7. Houlton 

8. Millinocket 

9. Newport 

10. Presque Isle 

11. So. Brewer 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

DISTRICT 

Auburn 

Bath 

Brunswick 

Lewiston 

Norway 

Portland 

Rumford 

Saco 

Sanford 

Skowhegan 

So. Portland 

Waterville 

Westbrook 

3D 

1. 

2. 

DISTRICT 

Augusta 

Gardiner 
Maryland and The District of Columbia 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

MARYLAND NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 2D DISTRICT 4TH DISTRICT 6TH DISTRICT 

1. Cambridge 1. Bel Air 1. Baltimore 1. Cumberland 

2. Centreville 2. Dundalk 5f H DISTRICT 2. Frederick 

3. Chestertown 3. Cantonsville j Annapolis 3. Frostburg 

4. Crisfield 4. Edgewood 2 . Baltimore

 4

- Hagerstown 

5. Denton 5. Havre de Grace 3 E||;cott c i t y 5. Highfield 

6- Easton 6. Middle River 4 G | e n Burnie 6. Kensington 

7. Elkton 7. Pikesville 5 Greenbelt

 7

- Oakland 

8. Pocomoke City 8. Towson 6 Hyattsville

 8

- Silver Spring 

9. Salisbury 9. Westminster y L a p|at a 7T H D | S TR|CT 

3D DISTRICT 8. Laurel |. Baltimore 

1. Baltimore 9. Leonardtown 

10. Prince Frederick 
Massachusetts 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

"<£**<& 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Adams 

2. Greenfield 

3. Holyoke 

4. North Adams 

5. Orange 

6. Pittsfield 

7. Westfield 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Agawam 

2. Chicopee 

3. Northampton 

4. Springfield 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Clinton 

2. Fitchburg 

3. Gardner 

4. Hudson 

5. Leominster 

6. Marlboro 

7. Milford 

8. Northbridge 

9. Southbridge 

10. Ware 

11. Webster 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Framingham 

2. Waltham 

3. Worcester 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Ayer 

2. Concord 

3. Lowell 

4. Woburn 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Beverly 

2. Gloucester 

3. Haverhill 

4. Methuen 

5. Newburyport 

6. Salem 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Chelsea 

2. Lawrence 

3. Lynn 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Everett 

2. Maiden 

3. Medford 

4. Melrose 

5. Reading 

6. Saugus 

7. Somerville 

8. Stoneham 

9. Wakefield 

9TH DISTRICT 

Barnstable 

Bourne 

Bridgewater 

Falmouth 

Hingham 

6. Middleboro 

7. New Bedford 

8. Plymouth 

9. Whitman 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Boston 

2. Brookline 

3. Newton 

11TH DISTRICT 

1. Boston 

2. Cambridge 

12TH DISTRICT 

1. Boston 

13TH DISTRICT 

1. Braintree 

2. Brockton 

3. Milton 

4. Needham 

5. Norwood 

6. Quincy 

7. Weymouth 

14TH DISTRICT 

1. Attleboro 

2. Fall River 

3. Natick 

4. Stoughton 

5. Taunton 

6. Wellesley 
Michigan 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Detroit 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Adrian 

2. Ann Arbor 

3. Jackson 

Monroe 

Ypsilanti 

DISTRICT 

Albion 

Battle Creek 

Charlotte 

Coldwater 

Grand Ledge 

Kalamazoo 

4. 

5. 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Dowagiac 

2. Niles 

3. St. Joseph 

4. South Haven 

5. Sturgis 

6. Three Rivers 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Grand Haven 

2. Grand Rapids 

3. Holland 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Flint 

2. Howell 

3. Lansing 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Lapeer 

2. Port Huron 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Alma 

2. Greenville 

3. Ionia 

4. Owosso 

5. Saginaw 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Cadillac 

2. Manistee 

3. Muskegon 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Bay City 

2. Big Rapids 

3. Grayling 

4. Midland 

11TH DISTRICT 

1. Alpena 

2. Cheboygan 

3. Gladstone 

4. Manistique 

5. Sault Ste Marie 

18 

1,13,14, 

15,16,17 

12TH DISTRICT 

1. Baraga 

2. Calumet 

3. Iron River 

4. Ironwood 

5. Ishpeming 

6. Kingsford 

7. Marquette 

13TH, 14TH, 15TH, 

16TH & 17TH 

DISTRICTS 

1. Detroit 

18TH DISTRICT 

1. Detroit 

2. Pontiac 
Minnesota 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Albert Lea 

2. Austin 

3. Faribault 

4. Hastings 

5. Northfield 

6. Owatonna 

7. Red Wing 

8. Rochester 

9. West St. Paul 

10. Winona 

11. Zumbrota 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Fairmont 

2. Hutchinson 

3. Jackson 

4. Luverne 

5. Mankota 

6. New Ulm 

7. Pipestone 

8. St. James 

9. St. Peter 

10. Windom 

11. Worthington 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Anoka 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. St. Paul 

2. Stillwater 

3. White Bear Lake 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Minneapolis 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Appleton 

2. Benson 

3. Brainerd 

4. Camp Ripley 

5. Crosby 

6. Dawson 

7. Litchfield 

8. Madison 

9. Marshall 

10. Milaca 

11. Montevideo 

12. Morris 

13. Olivia 

14. Ortonville 

15. Princeton 

16. Redwood Falls 

17. St. Cloud 

18. Sauk Centre 

19. Tracy 

20. Willmar 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Alexandria 

2. Bemidji 

3. Crookston 

4. Detroit Lakes 

5. Fergus Falls 

6. Long Prairie 

7. Moorhead 

8. Park Rapids 

9. Thief River Falls 

10. Wadena 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Aitkin 

2. Chisholm 

3. Cloquet 

4. Duluth 

5. Eveleth 

6. Grand Rapids 

7. Hibbing 

8. Pine City 

9. Virginia 
NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Batesville 

2. Belzoni 

3. Charleston 

4. Clarksdale 

5. Cleveland 

6. Drew 

7. Durant 

8. Greenville 

9. Greenwood 

10. Grenada 

11. Hernando 

12. Hollandale 

13. Holly Springs 

14. Indianola 

15. Lexington 

16. Leland 

17. Marks 

18. Moorhead 

19. New Albany 

20. Oxford 

2 1 . Ripley 

22. Rolling Fork 

23. Sardis 

24. Senatobia 

25. Tunica 

26. Water Valley 

27. Webb 

28. Winona 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

Aberdeen 

Amory 

Baldwyn 

Belmont 

Booneville 

Bruce 

Calhoun City 

Corinth 

Eupora 

Fulton 

Houston 

luka 

Kosciusko 

Louisville 

Nettleton 

Okolona 

Pontotoc 

Tupelo 

West Point 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Brookhaven 

2. Crystal Springs 

3. Gloster 

4. Hazelhurst 

5. Jackson 

6. McComb 

7. Magnolia 

8. Meadville 

9. Natchez 

10. Port Gibson 

11. Summit 

12. Tylertown 

13. Vicksburg 

14. Wesson 

15. Yazoo City 

Mississippi 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Bay Springs 

2. Brandon 

3. Canton 

4. Carthage 

5. Decatur 

6. Dekalb 

7. Forest 

8. Magee 

9. Mendenhall 

10. Meridian 

11. Morton 

12. Newton 

13. Philadelphia 

14. Quitman 

15. Scooba 

16. Taylorsville 

17. Union 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Bay St. Louis 

2. Biloxi 

3. Camp Shelby 

4. Collins 

5. Columbia 

6. Ellisville 

7. Gulfport 

8. Hattiesburg 

9. Laurel 

10. Lucedale 

11. Lumberton 

12. Monticello 

13. Ocean Springs 

14. Pascagoula 

15. Picayune 

16. Poplarville 

17. Prentiss 

18. Purvis 

19. Richton 

20. Waynesboro 

2 1 . Wiggins 
1,2,3 

Missouri 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST, 2D & 3D 

DISTRICTS 

1. St. Louis 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Clinton 

2. Lexington 

3. Nevada 

4. Sedalia 

5. Warrensburg 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Independence 

2. Kansas City 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Albany 

2. Chillicothe 

3. Maryville 

4. Richmond 

5. St. Joseph 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Anderson 

2. Aurora 

3. Carthage 

4. Joplin 

5. Lamar 

6. Monert 

7. Neosho 

8. Pierce City 

9. Springfield 

10. Webb City 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Boonville 

2. Columbia 

3. De Soto 

4. Festus 

5. Fredericktown 

6. Jefferson City 

7. Lebanon 

8. Marshall 

9. Rolla 

10. Salem 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Fulton 

2. Hannibal 

3. Kirksville 

4. Mexico 

5. Moberly 

6. St. Clair 

7. Warrenton 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

Bernie 

Cape Girardeau 

Caruthersville 

Charleston 

Dexter 

Doniphan 

Farmington 

Jackson 

Kennett 

Perryville 

Poplar Bluff 

Portageville 

Sikeston 

West Plains 
Montana 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1S1 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

DISTRICT 

Anaconda 

Bozeman 

Butte 

Deer Lodge 

Dillon 

Hamilton 

Helena 

Kalispell 

Missoula 

Poison 

Whitefish 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

DISTRICT 

Billings 

Chinook 

Culbertson 

Fairview 

Glasgow 

Glendive 

Harlowton 

Havre 

Lewistown 

Livingston 

Malta 

Miles City 

Plentywood 

Shelby 

Sidney 
Nebraska 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Auburn 

2. Beatrice 

3. Columbus 

4. Crete 

5. Fairbury 

6. Foils City 

7. Fremont 

8. Lincoln 

9. Nebraska City 

10. Norfolk 

11. Wahoo 

12. Wayne 

13. York 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Ashland 

2. Omaha 

Nevada 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

At Large 

1. Carson City 

2. Elko 

3. Ely 

4. Fallon 

5. Hawthorne 

6. Las Vegas 

7. Minden 

8. Reno 

9. Winnemucca 

10. Yerington 
New Hampshire 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Berlin 

2. Dover 

3. Laconia 

4. Manchester 

5. Plymouth 

6. Portsmouth 

7. Rochester 

8. Somersworth 

9. Wolfeboro 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

DISTRICT 

Claremont 

Concord 

Franklin 

Hillsboro 

Keene 

Lancaster 

Lebanon 

Littleton 

Milford 

Nashua 

Newport 

Peterboro 

Woodsville 
New Jersey 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Camden 

2. Haddonfield 

3. Pitman 

4. Salem 

5. Woodbury 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Atlantic City 

2. Bridgeton 

3. Cape May 

Court House 

4. Hammonton 

5. Ocean City 

6. Vineland 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Belford 

2. Freehold 

3. Long Branch 

4. Red Bank 

5. Sea Girt 

6. Toms River 

7. Tuckerton 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Bordentown 

2. Burlington 

3. Marlton 

4. Mount Holly 

5. Princeton 

6. Trenton 

7. West Trenton 

8. Fort Dix 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Bound Brook 

2. Dover 

3. Morristown 

4. Riverdale 

5. Somerville 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Elizabeth 

2. Linden 

3. Plainfield 

4. Summit 

5. Westfield 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Flemington 

2. Franklin 

3. Kackettstown 

4. Lodi 

5. Newton 

6. Phillipsburg 

7. Washington 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Passaic 

2. Paterson 

3. Wayne 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Dumont 

2. Englewood 

3. Teaneck 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Newark 

11TH DISTRICT 

1. East Orange 

2. Orange 

3. West Orange 

12TH DISTRICT 

1. Newark 

13TH DISTRICT 

1. Jersey City 

14TH DISTRICT 

None 

15TH DISTRICT 

1. New Brunswick 

2. Woodbridge 
r 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

At Large 

1. Alamogordo 

2. Albuquerque 

3. Artesia 

4. Belen 

5. Carlsbad 

6. Clayton 

7. Clovis 

8. Deming 

9. Espanola 

10. Farmington 

11. Fort Sumner 

12. Gallup 

13. Hobbs 

14. Las Cruces 

15. Las Vegas 

16. Lordsburg 

17. Lovington 

18. Portales 

19. Raton 

New Mexico 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

20. Roswell 

2 1. Santa Fe 

22. Silver City 

23. Socorro 

24. Springer 

25. Taos 

26. Truth or 

Consequences 

27. Tucumcari 
New York 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

33 

31 

40 32 

& • • hTTra.' 

y<^Z^ / r^^, 36 • 1 

f 43. • W ^ l_J 

• • • • 37 • n 

34 

29» 

28' 

22,23,24,25 Bronx 

16,17,18,19,20,21 New York 

•27 

26 'o« 

8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 Kings ^ T 

15 Z_ 4,5,6,7 & 11 Queens 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Amityville 

2. Bay Shore 

3. Huntington 

4. Huntington 

Station 

5. Nesconset 

6. Patchogue 

7. Riverhead 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Freeport 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Hempstead 

4TH THRU 25TH 

DISTRICTS 

1. New York City 

26TH DISTRICT 

1. Kensico 

2. Mount Vernon 

3. White Plains 

27TH DISTRICT 

1. Ossining 

2. Peekskill 

3. Yonkers 

28TH DISTRICT 

1. Middletown 

2. Newburgh 

3. Orangeburg 

4. Walton 

5. Spring Valley 

29TH DISTRICT 

1. Catskill 

2. Hudson 

3. Kingston 

4. Poughkeepsie 

30TH DISTRICT 

1. Albany 

2. Cohoes 

3. Troy 

31ST DISTRICT 

1. Glens Falls 

2. Hoosick Falls 

3. Saratoga Springs 

4. Ticonderoga 

5. Whitehall 

32D DISTRICT 

1. Amsterdam 

2. Gloversville 

3. Oneonta 

4. Schenectady 

33D DISTRICT 

1. Carthage 

2. Malone 

3. Ogdensburg 

4. Oswego 

5. Saranac Lake 

6. Watertown 

34TH DISTRICT 

1. Mohawk 

2. Oneida 

3. Rome 

4. Utica 

35TH DISTRICT 

1. Syracuse 

36TH DISTRICT 

1. Auburn 

2. Cortland 

3. Geneva 

37TH DISTRICT 

1. Binghamton 

2. Corning 

3. Elmira 

4. Hornell 

38TH DISTRICT 

1. Rochester 

39TH DISTRICT 

1. Batavia 

2. Medina 

40TH DISTRICT 

1. Buffalo 

2. Lockport 

3. Niagara Falls 

4. Tonawanda 

5. Ransomville 

41 ST DISTRICT 

None 

42D DISTRICT 

1. Orchard Park 

43D DISTRICT 

1. Dunkirk 

2. Geneseo 

3. Jamestown . 

4. Olean 
North Carolina 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Ahoskie 

2. Edenton 

3. Elizabeth City 

4. Farmville 

5. Greenville 

6. Washington 

7. Williamston 

8. Windsor 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Henderson 

2. Kinston 

3. Lasker 

4. Louisburg 

5. Roanoke Rapids 

6. Rocky Mount 

7. Scotland Neck 

8. Snow Hill 

9. Tarboro 

10. Warrenton 

11. Wilson 

12. Woodland 

13. Youngsville 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Beulaville 

2. Clinton 

3. Dunn 

4. Fremont 

5. Goldsboro 

6. Jacksonville 

7. Morehead City 

8. Mt. Olive 

9. New Bern 

10. Roseboro 

11. Wallace 

12. Warsaw 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Apex 

2. Asheboro 

3. Benson 

4. Lexington 

5. Nashville 

6. Raleigh 

7. Siler City 

8. Smithfleld 

9. Thomasville 

10. Zebulon 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Butner 

2. Elkin 

3. Leaksville 

4. Mount Airy 

5. North Wilkesboro 

6. Oxford 

7. Reidsville 

8. Roxboro 

9. Winston-Salem 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Burlington 

2. Carboro 

3. Chapel Hill 

4. Durham 

5. Greensboro 

6. High Point 

7. Mebane 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Bladenboro 

2. Elizabethtown 

3. Fair Bluff 

4. Fayetteville 

5. Lumberton 

6. Laurinburg 

7. Parkton 

8. Raeford 

9. Red Springs 

10. St. Pauls 

11. Shallotte 

12. Whiteville 

13. Wilmington 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Charlotte 

2. Hamlet 

3. Lincolnton 

4. Monroe 

5. Rockingham 

6. Sanford 

7. Southern Pines 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Albermarle 

2. Boone 

3. Concord 

4. Lenoir 

5. Mocksville 

6. Mooresville 

7. Salisbury 

8. Statesville 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Belmont 

2. Forest City 

3. Gastonia 

4. Hickory 

5. Kings Mountain 

6. Morganton 

7. Newton 

8. Shelby 

9. Spindale 

11TH DISTRICT 

1. Asheville 

2. Canton 

3. Hendersonville 

4. Sylva 

5. Waynesville 
f 

r • 

• 

• 

L • 

North Dakota 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• • 

• • 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

At Large 

1. Bismarck 

2. Bottineau 

3. Cando 

4. Carrington 

5. Cavalier 

6. Devils Lake 

7. Dickinson 

8. Edgeley 

9. Fargo 

10. Garrison 

11. Grand Forks 

12. Grafton 

13. Harvey 

14. Hettinger 

15. Hillsboro 

16. Jamestown 

17. Linton 

18. Lisbon 

19. Mandan 

~«VM -M 

1 

. • • ! 

• 1 

-

1 

20. Mayville 

2 1 . Minot 

22. Mott 

23. Oakes 

24. Rugby 

25. Valley City 

26. Wahpeton 

27. Williston 

28. Wishek 
Ohio 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Cincinnati 

2D DISTRICT 

None 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Dayton 

2. Hamilton 

3. Middletown 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Covington 

2. Eaton 

3. Greenville 

4. Lima 

5. Piqua 

6. Sidney 

7. Spencerville 

8. St. Marys 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Bowling Green 

2. Defiance 

3. Napoleon 

4. Oak Harbor 

5. Ottowa 

6. Paulding 

7. Port Clinton 

8. Van Wert 

9. Swanton 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Batavia 

2. Chillicothe 

3. Circleville 

4. Greenfield 

5. Hillsboro 

6. Manchester 

7. Portsmouth 

8. Washington C. H. 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Blanchester 

2. Bellefontaine 

3. Lebanon 

4. London 

5. Marysville 

6. Springfield 

7. Urbana 

8. Wilmington 

9. Xenia 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Ada 

2. Bucyrus 

3. Findlay 

4. Galion 

5. Kenton 

6. Marion 

7. Tiffin 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Toledo 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Athens 

2. Ironton 

3. Lancaster 

4. Logan 

11TH DISTRICT 

1. Ashtabula 

2. Conneaut 

3. Kent 

4. Painesville 

5. Ravenna 

6. Warren 

7. Willoughby 

12TH DISTRICT 

1. Columbus 

2. Westerville 

3. Lockbourne 

13TH DISTRICT 

1. Clyde 

2. Elyria 

3. Fremont 

4. Lorain 

5. Norwalk 

6. Sandusky 

14TH DISTRICT 

1. Akron 

2. Barberton 

15TH DISTRICT 

1. Caldwell 

2. Cambridge 

3. Marietta 

4. New Lexington 

5. Zanesville 

16TH DISTRICT 

1. Akron-Canton 

Airport 

2. Alliance 

3. Canton 

4. Massillon 

5. New Philadelphia 

6. Shreve 

7. Wooster 

17TH DISTRICT 

1. Ashland 

2. Coshocton 

3. Delaware 

4. Mansfield 

5. Mt. Vernon 

6. Newark 

18TH DISTRICT 

1. Steubenville 

19TH DISTRICT 

1. Youngstown 

20TH DISTRICT 

1. Cleveland 

2. Lakewood 

21ST DISTRICT 

1. Cleveland 

22D DISTRICT 

1. Cleveland 

23D DISTRICT 

1. Berea 

2. Chagrin Falls 
Oklahoma 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Alva 

2. Blackwell 

3. Broken Arrow 

4. Cherokee 

5. Chilocco 

6. Enid 

7. Pawnee 

8. Perry 

9. Ponca City 

10. Sperry 

11. Tonkawa 

12. Tulsa 

13. Woodward 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

DISTRICT 

Beggs 

Claremore 

Eufaula 

Fairfax 

Henryetta 

Haskell 

Hominy 

Miami 

Muskogee 

Nowata 

Okmulgee 

Pawhuska 

Stillwell 

Tahlequah 

Vinita 

Wagoner 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

DISTRICT 

Ardmore 

Atoka 

Durant 

Hartshorne 

Healdton 

Hugo 

Idabel 

Madill 

McAlester 

Poteau 

Sulphur 

Tishomingo 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

Ada 

Allen 

Bristow 

Chandler 

Cushing 

Guthrie 

Holdenville 

Konawa 

Okemah 

Seminole 

Shawnee 

Sopulpa 

Stillwater 

Wetumka 

Wewoka 

5TH [ 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

Edmond 

El Reno 

Norman 

Oklahoma City 

Pauls Valley 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

Altus 

Anadarko 

Chickasha 

Clinton 

Duncan 

Elk City 

Hobart 

Hollis 

Kingfisher 

Lawton 

Mangum 

Marlow 

Minco 

Walters 

Watonga 

Waurika 

Weatherford 
Oregon 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Astoria 

2. Camp Rilea 

3. Clackamas 

4. Corvallis 

5. Dallas 

6. Forest Grove 

7. Hillsboro 

8. McMinnville 

9. Newburg 

10. Newport 

11. Oregon City 

12. Oswego 

13. Salem 

14. St. Helens 

15. Silverton 

16. Tillamook 

17. Woodburn 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

DISTRICT 

Baker 

Bend 

Burns 

Hood River 

Klamath Falls 

LaGrande 

Milton-Freewater 

Ontario 

Pendleton 

Redmond 

The Dalles 

3D 

1. 

2. 

DISTRICT 

Gresham 

Portland 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Albany 

2. Ashland 

3. Coos Bay 

4. Cottage Grove 

5. Grants Pass 

6. Eugene 

7. Lebanon 

8. Medford 

9. Roseburg 
Pennsylvania 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST, 2D, 3D, 4TH, 

5TH, & 6TH 

DISTRICTS 

1. Philadelphia 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Chester 

2. Media 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Allentown 

2. Bristol 

3. Doylestown 

4. Easton 

5. Sellersville 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Columbia 

2. Lancaster 

3. Paoli 

4. Phoenixville 

5. West Chester 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Carbondale 

2. Honesdale 

3. Scranton 

11TH DISTRICT 

1. Hazleton 

2. Nanticoke 

3. West Pittston 

4. Wilkes Barre 

12TH DISTRICT 

1. Milton 

2. Pine Grove 

3. Pottsville 

4. Sunbury 

5. Tamaqua 

13TH DISTRICT 

1. Norristown 

2. Pottsville 

3. Worcester 

14TH DISTRICT 

1. Hamburg 

2. Kutztown 

3. Reading 

15TH DISTRICT 

1. Bethlehem 

2. East Stroudsburg 

3. Lehightown 

16TH DISTRICT 

1. Annville 

2. Harrisburg 

3. Hershey 

4. Lebanon 

5. Williamsport 

17TH DISTRICT 

1. Berwick 

2. Danville 

3. Lock Haven 

4. Mansfield 

5. Plymouth 

6. Wellsboro 

7. Williamsport 

18TH DISTRICT 

1. Chambersburg 

2. Everett 

3. Huntingdon 

4. Lewisburg 

5. Lewistown 

6. Somerset 

7. Waynesburg 

19TH DISTRICT 

1. Carlisle 

2. Gettysburg 

3. Hanover 

4. Middletown 

5. New Cumberland 

6. York 

20TH DISTRICT 

1. Altoona 

2. Bellefonte 

3. Clearfield 

4. State College 

5. Tyrone 

21ST DISTRICT 

1. Blairsville 

2. Greensburg 

3. Latrobe 

4. Ligonier 

5. Mt. Pleasant 

22D DISTRICT 

1. Ford City 

2. Indiana 

3. Johnstown 

23D DISTRICT 

1. Bradford 

2. Franklin 

3. Kane 

4. Oil City 

5. Punxsutawney 

6. Ridgeway 

7. Warren 

24TH DISTRICT 

1. Corry 

2. Erie 

3. Grove City 

4. Meadville 

5. Sharpsville 

25TH DISTRICT 

1. Butler 

2. New Brighton 

3. New Castle 

26TH DISTRICT 

1. Canonsburg 

2. Monessen 

3. Monongahela 

4. Scottdale 

5. Washington 

6. Waynesburg 

27TH DISTRICT 

1. Bridgeville 

2. Coraopolis 

3. Oakdale 

4. Pittsburgh 

28TH DISTRICT 

1. Pittsburgh 

29TH DISTRICT 

1. Pittsburgh 

2. Rural Ridge 

30TH DISTRICT 

1. Elizabeth 

2. Pittsburgh 
Puerto Rico 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

Aguadilla 

Aibonito 

Arecibo 

Bayamon 

Cabo Rojo 

Caguas 

Carolina 

Catano 

Cayey 

Ceiba 

Coamo 

Guayama 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

20. 

2 1. 

22. 

23. 

Gurabo 

Humacao 

Juncos 

Mayaguez 

Penuelas 

Ponce 

Sabana Grande 

San German 

San Juan 

Vega Baja 

Yauco 

Rhode Island 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Bristol 

2. Newport 

3. Pawtucket 

4. Warren 

5. Woonsocket 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Coventry 

2. Cranston 

3. East Greenwich 

4. Foster 

5. Providence 

6. Warwick 

7. Westerly 
South Carolina 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Allendale 

2. Beaufort 

3. Charleston 

4. Hampton 

5. Manning 

6. North Charleston 

7. Ridgeland 

8. Saint George 

9. Summerville 

10. Walterboro 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Bamberg 

2. Barnwell 

3. Batesburg 

4. Columbia 

5. Lexington 

6. Orangeburg 

7. Saint Matthews 

8. Sumter 

9. Warrenville 

10. West Columbia 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

DISTRICT 

Abbeville 

Anderson 

Belton 

Clemson 

Easley 

Edgefield 

Greenwood 

Johnston 

McCormick 

Newberry 

Saluda 

Seneca 

Ware Shoals 

Whitmire 

Williamston 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Clinton 

2. Greenville 

3. Inman 

4. Jonesville 

5. Lockart 

6. Laurens 

7. Lyman 

8. Pacolet Mills 

9. Spartanburg 

10. Union 

11. Woodruff 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Camden 

2. Cheraw 

3. Chester 

4. Clover 

5. Fort Mill 

6. Gaffney 

7. Jefferson 

8. Lancaster 

9. Rock Hill 

10. York 

11. Winnsboro 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

Andrews 

Bennettsville 

Bishopville 

Conway 

Darlington 

Dillon 

Florence 

Georgetown 

Hartsville 

Hemingway 

Kingstree 

Lake City 

Marion 

Mullins 

Myrtle Beach 

Timmonsville 
South Dakota 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Aberdeen 

2. Britton 

3. Brookings 

4. Canton 

5. Chamberlain 

6. Clark 

7. Clear Lake 

8. De Smet 

9. Flandreau 

10. Gettysburg 

11. Howard 

12. Huron 

13. Madison 

14. Milbank 

15. Miller 

16. Mitchell 

17. Mobridge 

18. Parkston 

19. Pierre 

20. Platte 

2 1. Redfield 

22. Salem 

23. Sioux Falls 

24. Sisseton 

25. Springfield 

26. Tripp 

27. Vermillion 

28. Wagner 

29. Watertown 

30. Webster 

3 1 . Wessington 

Springs 

32. Woonsocket 

33. Yankton 

2ND DISTRICT 

1. Belle Fourche 

2. Custer 

3. Deadwood 

4. Hot Springs 

5. Lead 

6. Lemmon 

7. Philip 

8. Rapid City 

9. Spearfish 

10. Sturgis 

11. Winner 
Tennessee 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1S1 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

r DISTRICT 

Bristol 

Elizabethton 

Johnson City 

Kingsport 

Morristown 

DISTRICT 

Clinton 

Harriman 

Knoxville 

Lenoir City 

Maryville 

Oak Ridge 

Rockwood 

DISTRICT 

Athens 

Chattanooga 

Cleveland 

Dayton 

Etowah 

South Pittsburg 

Sweetwater 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

Cookeville 

Crossville 

Fayetteville 

Lebanon 

Lewisburg 

Livingston 

McMinnville 

Murfreesboro 

Shelbyville 

Smithville 

Sparta 

Tullahoma 

Winchester 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Nashville 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

Centerville 

Clarksville 

Columbia 

Dickson 

Franklin 

Gallatin 

Lawrenceburg 

Pulaski 

Springfield 

Waverly 

Waynesboro 

7TH 1 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

Bolivar 

Camden 

Henderson 

Huntingdon 

Jackson 

Lexington 

McKenzie 

Paris 

Parsons 

Savannah 

Selmer 

Somerville 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

Alamo 

Brownsville 

Covington 

Dresden 

Dyersburg 

Humboldt 

Martin 

Milan 

Newbern 

Ripley 

Tiptonville 

Trenton 

Union City 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Memphis 
l^ 

• 

• • 

• 18 . 

• 

• 

• • 

• 19 

» 

• • 

• 

13 . 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Texas 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

12 5 

'• •• 

• i * 

16 21 

15 

• • 

.11' 

10. 

8 

14 22 22 

20 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Atlanta 

2. Clarksville 

3. Cooper 

4. Marshall 

5. Mount Pleasant 

6. New Boston 

7. Paris 

8. Sulphur Springs 

9. Texarkana 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Beaumont 

2. Nederland 

3. Orange 

4. Port Arthur 

5. Port Neches 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Carthage 

2. Henderson 

3. Kilgore 

4. Longview 

5. Tyler 

6. Winnsboro 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Bonham 

2. Denison 

3. Greenville 

4. Honey Grove 

5. Kaufman 

6. Sherman 

7. Terrell 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Dallas 

2. Garland 

3. Grand Prairie 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Bryan 

2. Cleburne 

3. Corsicana 

4. Hillsboro 

5. Kerens 

6. Mexia 

7. Waxahachie 

8. Whitney 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Athens 

2. Crockett 

3. Huntsville 

4. Jacksonville 

5. Lufkin 

6. Nacogdoches 

7. Palestine 

8. Rusk 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Baytown 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Angleton 

2. Columbus 

3. Edna 

4. El Campo 

5. Galveston 

6. Rosenberg 

7. Victoria 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Austin 

2. Brenham 

3. Lockhart 

4. Luling 

5. San Marcos 

6. Taylor 

N^j) 

11TH DISTRICT 

1. Belton 

2. Cameron 

3. Clifton 

4. Gatesville 

5. Martin 

6. Temple 

7. Waco 

12TH DISTRICT 

1. Arlington 

2. Fort Worth 

13th DISTRICT 

1. Bowie 

2. Decatur 

3. Denton 

4. Electro 

5. Gainesville 

6. Jacksboro 

7. Olney 

8. Vernon 

9. Wichita Falls 

14TH DISTRICT 

1. Alice 

2. Corpus Christi 

3. Cuero 

4. Gonzales 

5. Kingsville 

6. New Braunfels 

7. Robstown 

8. Seguin 

15TH DISTRICT 

1. Brownsville 

2. Carrizo Springs 

3. Donna 

4. Edinburg 

5. Horlingen 

6. Hondo 

7. Laredo 

8. McAllen 

9. Mercedes 

10. Mission 

11. Pharr 

12. Raymondville 

16TH DISTRICT 

1. El Paso 

2. Midland 

3. Monahans 

4. Odessa 

5. Pecos 

17TH DISTRICT 

1. Abilene 

2. Breckenridge 

3. Cisco 

4. Mineral Wells 

5. Ranger 

6. Snyder 

7. Stamford 

8. Stephenville 

9. Sweetwater 

10. Weatherford 

18TH DISTRICT 

1. Amarillo 

2. Borger 

3. Canyon 

4. Dumas 

5. Pampa 

6. Shamrock 

7. Tulia 

8. Wellington 

19TH DISTRICT 

1. Big Spring 

2. Brownfield 

3. Colorado City 

4. Lamesa 

5. Levellond 

6. Lubbock 

7. Plainview 

20TH DISTRICT 

1. San Antonio 

21ST DISTRICT 

1. Bollinger 

2. Brady 

3. Brownwood 

4. Coleman 

5. Fredericksburg 

6. Kerrville 

7. Lampasas 

8. San Angelo 

9. Santa Anna 

2 2D DISTRICT 

1. Houston 

2. La Porte 
Utah 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Beaver 

2. Brigham City 

3. Cedar City 

4. Fillmore 

5. Garland 

6. Logan 

7. Manti 

8. Mt. Pleasant 

9. Nephi 

10. Ogden 

11. Price 

12. Richfield 

13. St. George 

14. Smithfield 

15. Vernal 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

DISTRICT 

American Fork 

Bountiful 

Layton 

Lehi 

Murray 

Provo 

Salt Lake City 

Spanish Fork 

Springville 

Tooele 

Vermont 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

AT LARGE 

1. Barre 

2. Bellows Fall 

Bennington 

4. Bradford 

5. Brattleboro 

6. Burlington 

7. Enosburg 

8. Ludlow 

9. Lyndonville 

10. Middlebury 

11. Montpelier 

12. Morrisville 

13. Newport 

14. Northfield 

15. Proctor 

16. Rutland 

17. St. Albans 

18. St. Johnsbury 

19. Springfield 

20. Swanton 

2 1. Waterbury 

Williston 

Windsor 

Winooski 

Vergennes 

22 

23 

24 

25 
Virginia 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Hampton 

2. Newport News 

3. Onancock 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Norfolk 

2. Portsmouth 

3. South Norfolk 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Glen Allen 

2. Richmond 

3. Sandston 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Blackstone 

2. Emporia 

3. Farmville 

4. Franklin 

5. Hopewell 

6. Petersburg 

7. Powhatan 

8. Suffolk 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Danville 

2. Martinsville 

3. Rocky Mount 

4. South Boston 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Altavista 

2. Bedford 

3. Christiansburg 

4. Clifton Forge 

5. Covington 

6. Lynchburg 

7. Roanoke 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Berryville 

2. Harrisonburg 

3. Staunton 

4. Winchester 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Charlottesville 

2. Fredericksburg 

3. Leesburg 

4. Manassas 

5. Warrenton 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Big Stone Gap 

2. Gate City 

3. Pulaski 

4. Richlands 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Fairfax 

2. Manassas 
Washington 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1S1 

1. 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

3D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

r DISTRICT 

Seattle 

DISTRICT 

Anacortes 

Bellingham 

Everett 

Kenmore 

Port Angeles 

Snohomish 

DISTRICT 

Aberdeen 

Camas 

Centralia 

Longview 

Olymphia 

Shelton 

Vancouver 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Ellensburg 

2. Ephrata 

3. Pasco 

4. Pullman 

5. Toppenish 

6. Walla Walla 

7. Yakima 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Chewelah 

2. Colville 

3. Felts Field 

4. Okanogan 

5. Spokane 

6. Wenatchee 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Camp Murray 

2. Gray Field 

3. Midway 

4. Puyallup 

5. Tacoma 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Bremerton 

2. Olalla 

3. Port Orchard 

4. Poulsbo 
West Virginia 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1S1 

1. 

2. 

2D 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

DISTRICT 

Fairmont 

Moundsville 

DISTRICT 

Elkins 

Keyser 

Kingwood 

Martinsburg 

Morgantown 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Buckhannon 

2. Clarksburg 

3. Gassaway 

4. Oakhill 

5. Richwood 

6. Salem 

7. Weston 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Huntington 

2. Parkersburg 

3. Pt. Pleasant 

4. Spencer 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Bluefield 

2. Hinton 

3. Princeton 

4. Ronceverte 

5. Welch 

6. Williamson 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Beckley 

2. Charleston 

3. Dunbar 

4. Logan 

5. Montgomery 

6. St. Albans 

7. So. Charleston 
Wisconsin 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

1ST DISTRICT 

1. Beloit 

2. Burlington 

3. Elkhorn 

4. Janesville 

5. Kenosha 

6. Monroe 

7. Racine 

8. Whitewater 

2D DISTRICT 

1. Beaver Dam 

2. Fort Atkinson 

3. Jefferson 

4. Madison 

5. Oconomowoc 

6. Portage 

7. Stoughton 

8. Watertown 

9. Waukesha 

3D DISTRICT 

1. Baraboo 

2. Camp Douglas 

3. Mauston 

4. Onalaska 

5. Platteville 

6. Prairie Du Chien 

7. Reedsburg 

8. Sparta 

9. Tomah 

10. Viroqua 

4TH DISTRICT 

1. Milwaukee 

5TH DISTRICT 

1. Milwaukee 

6TH DISTRICT 

1. Fond Du Lac 

2. Hartford 

3. Neenah 

4. Oshkosh 

5. Plymouth 

6. Ripon 

7. Sheboygan 

8. Waupun 

9. West Bend 

7TH DISTRICT 

1. Antigo 

2. Berlin 

3. Clintonville 

4. Marshfield 

5. Mosinee 

6. Stevens Point 

7. Waupaca 

8. Wausau 

9. Wisconsin Rapids 

9TH DISTRICT 

1. Abbotsford 

2. Arcadia 

3. Black River Falls 

4. Chippewa Falls 

5. Eau Claire 

6. Hudson 

7. Menomonie 

8. Mondovi 

9. Neillsville 

10. New Richmond 

11. Rice Lake 

12. River Falls 

13. Stanley 

8TH DISTRICT 

1. Appleton 

2. Green Bay 

3. Manitowoc 

4. Marinette 

5. Oconto 

6. Two Rivers 

10TH DISTRICT 

1. Ashland 

2. Hayward 

3. Hurley 

4. Medford 

5. Merrill 

6. Phillips 

7. Rhinelander 

8. Spooner 

9. Superior 

10. Tomahawk 
Wyoming 

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 

NATIONAL GUARD COMMUNITIES 

AT LARGE 

1. Afton 

2. Casper 

3. Cheyenne 

4. Cody 

5. Douglas 

6. Evanston 

7. Gillette 

8. Lander 

9. Laramie 

10. Lovell 

11. Lusk 

12. Newcastle 

13. Powell 

14. Rawlins 

15. Riverton 

16. Rock Springs 

17. Sheridan 

18. Thermopolis 

19. Torrington 

20. Wheatland 

2 1 . Worland 


(Jam the Guarb 

V_^ " itilian in 'peace, Soldier m War. . . oj security and honor, for three centuries 

I hate been the custoiian, I am the Quart. •**•-

/ Was With Washington in the dim forests, fought the Wily Warrior, ant Watched 

the Dark night boW to the morning. 'At Concord's britge, I jiret the fateful 

shot heart 'remit the World. I blet on 'JBunker Hill. My footprints 

market the snoWs at Valley 'Forge. I pullet a mufflct oar on the barge that 

britget the icy 'Delaware. I stoot With Washington on the sun-trenchet heights 

oj 1/orktoWn. I saW the sWort surrenteret. . . I am the Quart. 

I pullet the trigger that looset the long rifle's hatoc at NeW Orleans. Oliese 

things I kneW-I Was there! I saW both sites of the War between the Statesl Was there! Ohe hill at San Juan felt the fury of my charge. Ohe 

jar plains ant mountains oj the Philippines echoet to my shout.. . On the Mexican 

barter I stoot... I am the Quart. Ohe tark jorest oj the Argonne blazed With 

mil barrage. Chateau Ohierry crumblet to my cannonate. Unter 

the arches oj Victory I marched m legion -I Was there! I am the Quart. 

I boWet briefly on the grim Corregitor, then saW the light oj liberation shine on the faces 

oj my comrates. Ohrough the jungle ant on the beaches, I jought the enemy, beat, 

batteret ant broke him. I raiset our banner to the serene air on OkmaWa— I 

scramblet oter Normanty's beaches-1 Was there!... I am the Quart. 'Across 

the 38th parallel I mate my stant. •-*»» I jleW MIQ Alley- I Was there!.. . 

I am the Quart. 

i^oltier in War, civilian in peace... I am the Quart. 

I Was at JohnstoWn, where the raging Waters boomet toWn the talley. '^*jte£ 

I cratlet the crying chilt in my arms ant saW the terror leate her eyes. I motet 

through smoke ant flame at CJexas City. Ohe stricken kncW the comfort of 

my skill. I troppet the foot that fet the starting beast on the frozen fielts of tinWest ant through the toWering trijts I ploughed to rescue the marooned. I hate 

jacet jorWart to the tornado, the typhoon, and the horror oj the hurricane ant flood — 

these things I knoW-l Was there!.. . I am the Quard. I hate brought a more 

abundant, a juller, a jiner lije to our youth. Whereter a strong arm ant taliant 

spirit must dejend the Nation, in peace or War, whereter a child cries, or a Woman 

Weeps in time oj tisaster, there I stand. . .1 am the Quard. Tor three centuries 

a soldier in War, a citilian in peace- oj security and honor, I am the custodian, noW and 

joreter... I am the Quard.