alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as Amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

# NAME:

Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (#1171).

# DATE/TIME:

May 13, 2015; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., May 14, 2015; 9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

# PLACE:

National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Stafford I, Room 110, Arlington, VA 22230.

# TYPE OF MEETING:

Open.

# CONTACT PERSON:

 Dr. Deborah Olster, Office of the Assistant Director, Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 905, Arlington, Virginia 22230, 703-292-8700.

# SUMMARY OF MINUTES:

May be obtained from contact person listed above.

# PURPOSE OF MEETING: 

                        To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation on major goals and policies pertaining to Social, Behavioral                               ( print page 19696)                            and Economic Sciences Directorate (SBE) programs and activities.                    

## Agenda

## Wednesday, May 13, 2015

SBE Directorate Update

                    NSF Public Access Plan:                     *Today's Data, Tomorrow's Discoveries*

Report from SBE AC Subcommittee on Replicability in Science 

                    SBE 2020 Themes/                     *Rebuilding the Mosaic*

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics 

Statistical Sciences at NSF (StatsNSF) Subcommittee Update 

Science of Broadening Participation

### Thursday, May 14, 2015

Meeting with NSF Leadership

Decision-Making under Uncertainty/Risk and Resilience

Agenda and Dates for Future Meetings, Assignments and Concluding Remarks

Dated: April 7, 2015.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-08322 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.56

FIRST AMENDMENT OF SUPPLY CONTRACT FOR NO. K.TEL.31/HK.910/DLD-00/2005, DATED 8
         JULY 2005 FOR TANJUNG PANDAN - PONTIANAK CAPACITY EXPANSION NO.
               K.TEL.01/HK.920/DLD-00/2006, DATED 12 JANUARY 2006.

<TABLE>
<S>                    <C>
Parties:               1.   TELKOM; and

                       2.   NEC Corporation ("NEC").

Preceding Contracts:   Supply Contract for Tanjung Pandan - Pontianak Capacity
                       Expansion No. K.TEL.31/HK.910/DLD-00/2005 dated 8 July
                       2005.

Amended Provision:     The parties agree to amend the contract price.

Effective Date:        12 January 2006.
</TABLE>
#### Creditors of M'Kenzie *vs.*administrator of W.Burrows.

«use xxxvii.

n. n.p. 103.

Adm’r. of «tucicnt mils-ter to pay to *143the creditors ^bf^'court) proportigna/ b1-'-

*142Ordered, that Joseph Atkinson, administrator of \Y. Burrows, (late master in chancery,) do pay over to the ^ _ _ present master, the specie m Ins hands, as admitted by *143Ms answer: And that a settlement be made by the master of the proportion due to the several creditors whose demands have been allowed: And that the master do settle the same, with such creditors out of the bonds and securities in his hands, as far as they amount, according to their several proportions: That Mr. Atkinson do account for interest on the money in his hands: And that the costs be paid out of the same.

MARCH. 1786.

to creditor.-

It was also ordered, that a notification should be published in the Gazette, calling on all persons claiming any of the money which was in the hands of Mr, Burrows, Esq. late master of this court, at the time of his death, and which has been paid over by his executors to W. H. Gibbes, Esq. the present master, to prefer and support their claims before the said master within twelve months next ensuing: And the said master is thereupon to make his report to this court.
2,645.

#### JAMES H. CUMMINGS, Petitioner, v. CHARLES F. IRWIN (County Judge of El Dorado County), Respondent.

Pbactioe. — New Tbiab in Counts: Coubt. —New trials may be granted by tbe County Court in cases of appeal from the judgment of a Justice of the Peace, and it is the duty of the County Judge to settle a statement or motion for a new trial which has been duly filed and presented to him for settlement.

The facts of tbe case were agreed upon and submitted to tbis Court for adjudication.

Despondent is County Judge of El Dorado County. In January, 1870, one Gibenbeim recovered judgment in a Justice’s Court in said county against petitioner, for tbe sum of one hundred and eleven dollars.

Petitioner appealed to the County Court, where judgment was rendered in favor of Gibenbeim for tbe sum of eighty dollars.

Petitioner filed and served a notice of motion for new trial in said action, and afterwards filed and served a statement on motion for new trial and moved tbe Court to settle the statement, which tbe Court refused to do, on tbe ground that it bad no power to grant a new trial.

Tbis action is brought to obtain a peremptory mandate, commanding tbe respondent to-settle tbe statement.

*Geo. E. Williams,*for Petitioner.

Tbe Practice Act in relation to new trials, applies to all Courts of record, *(People*v. *Bosborough,*29 Cal. 415.)

*355
      *Geo. G. Blcmcliard,*for Respondent.

The County Court only bas appellate jurisdiction in tbe case. (Const. Art. VI., Sections 8 and 9,

The County Court can only exercise such appellate jurisdiction and strictly follow the statute. (2 Hittell 5,556-7; 84 Cal. 321; 10 Id. 19.)

Erodes, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court, Wallace, J., Ceookett, J., and Temple, J., concurring:

In a case which has been tried anew in the County Court, upon an appeal from the judgment of a Justice of the Peace, on questions of fact, or of both law and fact, a new trial may be granted by the County Court. The provisions of the Practice Act, relating to new trials in the District Courts, are applicable to new trials in the County Courts. It is therefore the duty of the County Judge to settle a statement on motion for a new trial, which has been duly filed and presented to him for settlement.

Mandate ordered.

Sprague, J., expressed no opinion».
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         I, Grant Miller, certify that:

         To the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2003 by
USA Broadband, Inc. and to which this certification is appended (the "Periodic
Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of USA Broadband, Inc.

Date:  February 25, 2003               /s/ Grant Miller
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       Grant Miller
                                       Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      49,535,784
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              105,679,979
<ALLOWANCES>                              (48,428,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           129,046,271
<PP&E>                                      57,574,328
<DEPRECIATION>                            (13,279,520)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             378,159,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       42,655,966
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       312,485
<OTHER-SE>                                 211,721,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               378,159,144
<SALES>                                    346,547,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           346,547,649
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           321,650,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,774,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,121,788
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,822,685
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,299,103
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,299,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1 

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (a) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-47554) pertaining to the Common Stock of Learning Tree International,Inc. and in the related Prospectus, (b) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32062) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., (c) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41325) pertaining to the 1995Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., and (d) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103372) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan of Learning Tree International, Inc., of our report dated November 7, 2003, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of Learning Tree International, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2003. 

 

/s/     Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

December 12, 2003
EX-10.55



 Exhibit 10.55 

Summary of Compensation Package for Mr. Kurt Briner 
 On June 14, 2012 the board of directors (the “Board”) of BioAmber Inc. (the “Company”) approved the following compensation package for Mr. Kurt Briner for his service as an
independent director of the Board: 
  

	 	a.	an annual fee of $40,000; and 

  

	 	b.	a stock option grant every two years of 10,500 options per year to be made at the anniversary dates of the initial election of the concerned board member.


 Previously, on August 15, 2011, the Board approved a grant of options to Mr. Briner to purchase 17,500 shares of the
Company’s common stock pursuant to the Company’s stock option plan at an exercise price of $10.55 per share, such options vesting over two years; 50% as of April 17, 2012 and 50% as of April 17, 2013. 

Mr. Briner does not have a written agreement with respect to director compensation.
0340

#### STANDARD ROOFING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DEAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Defendant *&*Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CAROLINA BABY, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

(324 S. E. (2d) 334)

Court of Appeals

*Robert M. Rosenfeld,*of *Porter & Rosenfeld,*Greenville, *for third-party defendant-appellant.*

*Robert M. White,*Greenville, *for plaintiff-respondent.*

*W. Benjamin McClain, Jr.,*of *Varner & McClain,*Green-ville, *for defendant and third-party plaintiff-respondent.*

*41Heard Sept. 17, 1984.

Decided Dec. 17, 1984.

Shaw, Judge:

This is an appeal from a circuit court order holding respondent Standard Roofing Company, Inc., can recover from respondent Dean Construction Company, Inc., and that Dean can recover from appellant Carolina Baby, Inc., in an action involving repairs to one of Carolina’s stores. We reverse.

Respondent Dean Construction Company, Inc., contracted in writing with appellant Carolina Baby> Inc., to remodel a store. Dean claims it also agreed orally with Carolina that Carolina would pay all expenses related to flashing holes in the roof. Dean subcontracted with Standard Roofing Company, Inc. for the flashing. After performing, Standard brought an action against Dean for the value of its work, $2,200.00. Dean brought this third-party action against Carolina to reform the written contract to reflect the alleged oral agreement concerning flashing, seeking indemnification of the amount it might have to pay Standard. The court refused to reform the Dean-Carolina contract, holding Dean is entitled to indemnification based on a finding the contract documents do not expressly hold Dean liable for flashing, and, the principle of unjust enrichment.

As noted, Dean asked for relief based on reformation and indemnification; it did not seek relief under the contract documents or restitution. Therefore, the trial court erred by going beyond the scope of the pleadings and granting relief on theories not pleaded. Judgments “not supported by the theories] of action on which the pleadings [are] framed [are] fatally defective.” *Crocker v. Crocker,*281 S. C. 154, 314 S. E. (2d) 343, 346 (Ct. App. 1984); *Bryan v. Bryan,*_ S. C. _, 319 S. E. (2d) 360, 360 (Ct. App. 1984); *Glass v. Glass,*276 S. C. 625, 281 S. E. (2d) 221, 222 (1981).

Reversed.

Bell and Goolsby, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134247 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134247 COA: 274181 Wayne CC: 01-004688-01 RODNEY P. HICKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 14, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

t1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

STEVE COLEMAN, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 69483 

FILED 

FEB 0 1 2016 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a 

motion to strike the State's response to the petitioner's motion for 

disqualification of district court judge. Eighth Judicial District Court, 

Clark County; Jennifer P. Togliatti, Judge. 

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the 

aforementioned order, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 

352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

ciA 

Saitta Pickering 

cc: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge 

Steve Coleman 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e 

J.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Salameh, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
      for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
      that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                at the dates and for the periods indicated.




This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.




Date:
      May 9, 2006 
 By:
              
              
              /s/
                  Michael J. Salameh
                Michael
                  J. Salameh
                
                
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: 

 

1. The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant. 

 

Date: March 30, 2004
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

S.A.W., ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D15-4905 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed December 7, 2016. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Patrice W. Moore, Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Ha Thu Dao, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. 

LaROSE, Judge. 

S.A.W., a juvenile, pleaded guilty to burglary, in violation of section 

810.02, Florida Statutes (2014), and grand theft, in violation of section 812.014, Florida 

Statutes (2014). The trial court withheld adjudication and placed S.A.W. on six months 

of probation. S.A.W. appeals the final adjudication and disposition. We have 

jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). S.A.W. argues that the trial court erred by 
- 2 - 

denying his dispositive motion to suppress DNA evidence and in failing to hold a plea 

colloquy or enter a written or oral disposition. We affirm, without further discussion, the 

trial court's order denying the motion to suppress evidence. 

The State concedes that the trial court did not hold a plea colloquy. See 

Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.080(a) ("Before accepting a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the court 

shall determine that the plea is knowingly and voluntarily entered and that there is a 

factual basis for it."). Thus, we must reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct 

the appropriate colloquy. See G.M.K. v. State, 312 So. 2d 538, 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975) 

(holding that remand was appropriate when the record failed to reflect a determination 

by the trial court that the juvenile entered a voluntary plea with an understanding of the 

nature of the allegations). 

Affirmed, in part, reversed, in part, and remanded. 

BLACK and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 8, 2016

No. 04-16-00565-CV

Ana Sophia SPENCER and William Alex Spencer,

Appellants

v.

Jennifer OVERPECK,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-03779

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellee’s unopposed second motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to December 12, 2016.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, May 20, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda Rivera at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3337.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line Project Committee will be held Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Linda Rivera. For more information please contact: Ms. Rivera at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3337, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1509—National Office, Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The committee will be discussing Toll-free issues and public input is welcomed.

Dated: April 7, 2015.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2015-08438 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P