Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 17 / Wednesday, January 26, 2011 / Notices 4743 

the public to allow the Commission to 

discuss applications for the UNESCO 

Young Professionals Program. This call 

will be closed pursuant to Section 10(d) 

of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 

and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) because it will 

involve discussions of information of a 

personal and financial nature regarding 

the relative merits of individual 

applicants where disclosure would 

constitute a clearly unwarranted 

invasion of privacy. 

For more information contact 

Elizabeth Kanick, Executive Director of 

the U.S. National Commission for 

UNESCO, Washington, DC 20037. 

Telephone: (202) 663–0026; Fax: (202) 

663–0035; E-mail: 

DCUNESCO@state.gov. 

Dated: January 14, 2011. 

Elizabeth Kanick, 

Executive Director, U.S. National Commission 

for UNESCO, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2011–1653 Filed 1–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–19–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Requests for Comments; 

Clearance of Renewed Approval of 

Information Collection(s): NAS Data 

Release Request 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 

invites public comments about our 

intention to request the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval to renew an information 

collection. The Federal Register Notice 

with a 60-day comment period soliciting 

comments on the following collection of 

information was published on 

September 22, 2010, vol. 75, no. 183, 

page 57828. The information enables the 

FAA to evaluate the validity of the 

user’s request for National Airspace 

(NAS) data from FAA systems and 

equipment. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

submitted by February 25, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carla Scott on (202) 267–9895, or by email at: Carla.Scott@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 2120–0668. 

Title: NAS Data Release Request. 

Form Numbers: FAA Form 1200–5. 

Type of Review: Renewal of an 

information collection. 

Background: This data collection is 

the genesis for granting approval to 

release filtered NAS data. The 

information provided sets the criteria 

for the FAA Data Release Request 

Committee (DRRC) to approve or 

disapprove individual requests for NAS 

data. The information submitted by the 

requestor determines the requestor’s 

eligibility to use FAA NAS data. The 

agency currently uses the collected 

information to determine suitability for 

procuring NAS data for use in various 

evaluations. 

Respondents: Approximately 15 data 

requestors. 

Frequency: Information is collected 

on occasion. 

Estimated Average Burden per 

Response: 3 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 45 

hours. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments on 

the proposed information collection to 

the Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget. Comments should be addressed 

to the attention of the Desk Officer, 

Department of Transportation/FAA, and 

sent via electronic mail to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov, or faxed 

to (202)395–6974, or mailed to the 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 

725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 

20503. 

Public Comments Invited: You are 

asked to comment on any aspect of this 

information collection, including (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for FAA’s 

performance; (b) the accuracy of the 

estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to 

enhance the quality, utility and clarity 

of the information collection; and (d) 

ways that the burden could be 

minimized without reducing the quality 

of the collected information. The agency 

will summarize and/or include your 

comments in the request for OMB’s 

clearance of this information collection. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on January 19, 

2011. 

Carla Scott, 

FAA Information Collection Clearance 

Officer, IT Enterprises Business Services 

Division, AES–200. 

[FR Doc. 2011–1546 Filed 1–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Commercial Space Transportation 

Advisory Committee—Public 

Teleconference 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of Commercial Space 

Transportation Advisory Committee 

Teleconference. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(Pub. L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice 

is hereby given of a teleconference of 

the Space Transportation Operations 

Working Group (STOWG) of the 

Commercial Space Transportation 

Advisory Committee (COMSTAC). The 

teleconference will take place on 

Thursday, February 17, 2011, starting at 

11 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. 

Individuals who plan to participate 

should contact Susan Lender, DFO, (the 

Contact Person listed below) by phone 

or e-mail for the teleconference call in 

number. 

The proposed agenda for this 

teleconference is to continue the 

discussion started during the October 6, 

2010, working group meeting, and 

continued during the December 8, 2010, 

teleconference. This discussion will 

center on the orbital debris questions 

asked by the FAA; it will also include 

a look at responses to the Concept of 

Operation for Global Space Vehicle 

Debris Threat Management report. 

Interested members of the public may 

submit relevant written statements for 

the COMSTAC working group members 

to consider under the advisory process. 

Statements may concern the issues and 

agenda items mentioned above or 

additional issues that may be relevant 

for the U.S. commercial space 

transportation industry. Interested 

parties wishing to submit written 

statements should contact Susan 

Lender, DFO, (the Contact Person listed 

below) in writing (mail or e-mail) by 

February 11, 2011, so that the 

information can be made available to 

COMSTAC members for their review 

and consideration before the February 

17, 2011, teleconference. Written 

statements should be supplied in the 

following formats: One hard copy with 

original signature or one electronic copy 

via e-mail. 

An agenda will be posted on the FAA 

Web site at http://www.faa.gov/go/ast. 

Individuals who plan to participate 

and need special assistance should 

inform the Contact Person listed below 

in advance of the meeting. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

4744 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 17 / Wednesday, January 26, 2011 / Notices 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lender (AST–100), Office of 

Commercial Space Transportation 

(AST), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 

Room 331, Washington, DC 20591, 

telephone (202) 267–8029; E-mail 

susan.lender@faa.gov. Complete 

information regarding COMSTAC is 

available on the FAA Web site at: 

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/ 

headquarters_offices/ast/ 

advisory_committee/. 

Issued in Washington, DC, January 20, 

2011. 

George C. Nield, 

Associate Administrator for Commercial 

Space Transportation. 

[FR Doc. 2011–1549 Filed 1–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0114; Notice 2] 

Bentley Motors, Inc., Grant of Petition 

for Decision of Inconsequential 

Noncompliance 

Bentley Motors, Inc. (Bentley) has 

determined that certain headlamps in 

2005–2008 Bentley Arnage and Azure 

passenger cars do not fully comply with 

paragraph S7.8.2.1(b) of 49 CFR 

571.108, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 

Standard (FMVSS) No. 108 Lamps, 

Reflective Devices and Associated 

Equipment. Bentley has filed an 

appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR 

Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance 

Responsibility and Reports. 

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 

30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49 

CFR part 556), Bentley has petitioned 

for an exemption from the notification 

and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. 

Chapter 301 on the basis that this 

noncompliance is inconsequential to 

motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of 

Bentley’s petition was published, with a 

30-day public comment period, on 7/30/ 

2009, in the Federal Register (74 FR 

38082). No comments were received. To 

view the petition and all supporting 

documents, log onto the Federal Docket 

Management System Web site at: 

http://www.regulations.gov/. Then 

follow the online search instructions to 

locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2009– 

0114.’’ 

For further information on this 

decision, contact Mr. Mike Cole, Office 

of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration (NHTSA), telephone 

(202) 366–2334, facsimile (202) 366– 

7002. 

Bentley estimated that 1,115 model 

year 2005–2008 Bentley Arnage and 

Azure passenger cars manufactured 

between January 13, 2004 and 

November 9, 2007 are involved. Bentley 

also stated that based on its preliminary 

investigation it believes that only 50% 

of those vehicles have the subject 

noncompliance. 

Paragraph S7.8.5.3(b) of FMVSS No. 

108 requires in pertinent part: 

S7.8.5.3 Visual/optical aiming. Each 

visually/optically aimable headlamp shall be 

designed to conform to the following 

requirements: * * * 

(b) Horizontal aim, lower beam. There shall 

be no adjustment of horizontal aim unless the 

headlamp is equipped with a horizontal 

VHAD. If the headlamp has a VHAD, it shall 

be set to zero. 

Bentley explained that the 

noncompliance with FMVSS No. 108 is 

that horizontal aim adjustment of the 

subject lower beams is possible due to 

the absence of a blanking cap over the 

lower beam horizontal adjustment 

screw. 

Bentley also stated that they 

discovered this noncompliance as a 

result of a special production line 

quality audit investigation. 

Bentley further stated that it believes 

that this noncompliance is 

inconsequential to motor vehicle safety 

for three reasons. First, the adjustment 

screw is always hidden by an engine 

cover when the vehicle’s hood is open. 

Second, when the engine cover is 

removed the screw is still hidden down 

a small dark guide hole, so the screw is 

not immediately visible and it is not 

immediately obvious that a disabling 

cap is not present. Last, the workshop 

manual clearly identifies that this screw 

is not functional on North American 

specification vehicles so no vehicle 

repairer would ever need to try to search 

for and adjust the screw in question. 

Bentley also has informed NHTSA 

that it has corrected the problem that 

caused this noncompliance. 

In summation, Bentley states that it 

believes that the noncompliance is 

inconsequential to motor vehicle safety 

and that no corrective action is 

warranted. 

NHTSA Decision 

NHTSA agrees with Bentley that the 

noncompliance is inconsequential to 

motor vehicle safety. The only possible 

safety risk is that someone could locate 

and improperly adjust the lower beam 

horizontal adjustment mechanism. That 

risk is extremely small. The location of 

the horizontal adjuster makes it difficult 

to access and there is no information in 

the owner’s manual or given to the 

dealer which indicates the location. 

Further, the lamps as originally 

installed in the subject vehicles are 

properly aimed and the need for reaiming is unlikely. In addition, it is 

unlikely that owners will try to adjust 

the headlamp aim since the owner’s 

manual instructs drivers to take the 

vehicle to the dealer if the lamps need 

to be re-aimed. Because dealers are 

generally not aware that the horizontal 

aim can be adjusted, they are likely to 

replace the lamps that may need 

adjustment. Moreover, to the extent this 

notice increases awareness on the part 

of owners or dealers that the horizontal 

adjustment mechanism is present on 

these vehicles, the notice will also 

inform them that any horizontal 

adjustment issue should be addressed 

by replacing the lamps and/or 

contacting Bentley. 

In consideration of the foregoing, 

NHTSA has decided that Bentley has 

met its burden of persuasion that the 

subject FMVSS No. 108 headlamps 

noncompliance is inconsequential to 

motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, 

Bentley’s petition is granted and the 

petitioner is exempted from the 

obligation of providing notification of, 

and a remedy for, the subject 

noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 

and 30120. 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; 

delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 

501.8. 

Issued on: January 19, 2011. 

Claude H. Harris, 

Acting Associate Administrator for 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2011–1582 Filed 1–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request for Form 1099–K 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Treasury, as part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is 

soliciting comments concerning Form 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES