alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Covance
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001023131
<NAME> COVANCE INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US$

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      25,444,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              192,327,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 26,474,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           302,124,000
<PP&E>                                     340,470,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              43,527,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             700,314,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      199,877,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       590,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 262,062,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               700,314,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           828,980,000
<CGS>                                      553,283,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              742,401,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,062,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             76,460,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                30,642,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         45,818,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                45,818,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78


</TABLE>
# Guard visits rural Alaska communities to strengthen ties

/ Published Dec. 23, 2019

JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska – Members of the Alaska Department of Military and Veterans Affairs visited Nome Dec. 17-18 as part of the new rural operations hub concept to strengthen ties with Alaska’s rural communities.

Maj. Gen. Torrence Saxe, Alaska National Guard commander and adjutant general and commissioner of the DMVA, took representatives from the state Office of Veterans Affairs, Air and Army Guard recruiters, members of the joint staff, the Alaska Military Youth Academy, Counterdrug Support Program and the Alaska State Defense Force.

During the Nome trip, the sixth site visit in support of the hub concept, the group met with Nome Mayor Richard Beneville and other city leaders, tribal council and Native corporation members, and key personnel from Nome schools, the port, harbor and hospital. Plans to grow rural operations in Alaska have also included stops in Bethel, Kwethluk, Napaskiak, Galena and Kodiak. The next visits will be in Utqiagvik and Kotzebue.

“We want to get back to having strong relationships in the community, have more folks from this area who are serving in the Guard, and prepositioned to respond to emergencies and natural disasters when called upon to assist,” said Saxe. “And in order to help the community respond as quickly as possible, we need Guardsmen already in place.”

Saxe said the Guard wants to ensure readiness and capability in Nome and build on relationships to better understand unique needs for emergency management and response.

“The one thing I don’t want to do is introduce ourselves for the first time in a crisis, so that’s in part why we are here,” he said.

In the meeting with Beneville, Saxe said DMVA personnel would visit Nome regularly, with a desire to grow the National Guard in the area.

“We’re looking to hire local, and to have folks work local, here in Nome,” said Saxe.

“We have a recruiter, we have the positions, we have an armory and aviation facility, a historical presence, and a desire to provide jobs and training here,” said Saxe. “This is where I truly need the help of the community, if you know someone who wants to join the Guard or is even just thinking about it, please let me know and let our recruiters know.”

The mayor and others said they would welcome a stronger military presence in the community.

The Army National Guard has had a full-time recruiter in Nome since May.  Staff Sgt. Christopher Thomas just finished teaching a leadership and citizenship class at Nome-Beltz Jr/Sr High School.  “Guard Your Future” is a civics-based curriculum offered by the Army National Guard that teaches life skills and volunteerism. Next semester, he will be available as a substitute teacher, continuing to provide a military perspective and helping develop students to understand more about discipline, character and service.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William C. Adair, Jr., hereby certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of Direct General
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Direct General Corporation.

      March 15, 2006                By: /s/ William C. Adair, Jr.
          Date                         ----------------------------------------
                                                    (Signature)
                                    Name:  William C. Adair, Jr.
                                    Title:  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
---

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acrongenomics, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Ron Lizee, the Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 15, 2007

|/s/ Ron Lizee                | 
|---------------------------- | 
|Ron Lizee                    | 
|Chief Financial Officer      | 
|Principal Accounting Officer | 

---
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

          KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Damien M. Sullivan, Bobby G. Jenkins and Barry
F. Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
PANAVISION INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form
10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the
undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to
the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in
connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this
29th day of March, 2005.

                                        /S/ ROBERT L. BEITCHER
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        ROBERT L. BEITCHER
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David Asai, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Learning Tree International, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Learning Tree International, Inc.

 

June 26, 2018

 

|   |    |               |
|--------|--------------|-------------------------|
|   | By:          | /s/ David Asai     |
|   | Name:        | David Asai              |
|   | Title:       | Chief Financial Officer |

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Learning Tree International, Inc. and will be retained by Learning Tree International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-51365

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELEAZAR PALACIOS-SANTOYO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-1378-1-PRM

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Eleazar Palacios-Santoyo appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Palacios contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction

that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a

separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been

alleged in his indictment. Palacios maintains that he pleaded
No. 02-51365

-2-

guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment and one-year maximum term

of supervised release which may be imposed for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Palacios acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
# Oregon Airman Shares His Journey to Success

/ Published Dec. 14, 2023

PORTLAND AIR GUARD STATION, Ore. –  Shining a light on the diverse paths to happiness and success, it’s evident that college is not the route to professional success for Airman 1st Class Stephen Warren. 

Warren, a firefighter in the 142nd Wing Civil Engineering Squadron, recognized this fact while still in high school. He explained that the conventional college route didn’t align with his future aspirations.

“I wanted to do something more hands-on. Something that would give me life experience and did not require me to be in an office all day” said Warren. 

Joining the Air National Guard allowed him to work in a physically active role and acquire a tactical skill set. 

The Air National Guard was an excellent option for Warren because it offered opportunities for career growth but also presented experiences like his first Temporary Duty Assignment (TDY) in Jacksonville, Arkansas. 

Though it was initially hard to integrate himself into the close-knit fire station, working with these people became his fondest memory of the mission. 

“You have to prove that you can do the job because they have to trust you with their life when you go into a fire,” said Warren. “The rewarding part of the TDY was how much experience I gained through such a short time and the amount that those guys poured into me with me not even being gained by their unit.”

One of Warren’s most memorable TDY experiences was volunteering to relieve natural disasters. He witnessed the remarkable professionalism and efficiency of the crew in the face of adversity. 

“There was a lot of adrenaline running, and then when I was selected to go out on one of the engines, blood started pumping, and I started thinking about all the things that needed to happen when we got out there,” said Warren. “Seeing the damage that the tornado caused was pretty gnarly, and it was really impressive watching the rest of the crew handle it so professionally and calmly.”

In addition to his military service, Warren is pursuing an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) certification and participates in training that assists his journey as a firefighter during off-duty hours. 

While continuing as a firefighter for the Oregon Air National Guard, he would also like to pursue a career in firefighting on the civilian side. 

“My longtime goal is to be a firefighter here in the local Portland metro area,” added Warren.

When Warren is not wearing the uniform, he is heavily involved in his local church community as a youth staff member. Drawing from his experience with mentors during high school, he is committed to providing guidance and support to the next generation.

Warren’s journey reflects a different avenue for personal and professional growth outside a traditional academic education. His dedication to service, continuous learning, and community involvement showcases that success is not confined to a classroom but can be found in diverse landscapes of passion and purpose.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3182 

To improve the Office of Refugee Resettlement shelter grant process. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2021 

Mr. CARPER (for himself, Mr. PORTMAN, and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To improve the Office of Refugee Resettlement shelter grant 

process. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Shelters Act of 

5 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OFFICE OF REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT SHELTER 

7 GRANT PROCESS. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

9 (1) ADVERSE ACTION.—The term ‘‘adverse ac10 tion’’ means an adverse criminal or regulatory action 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3182 IS

1 taken by the Federal Government or a State or local 

2 government with respect to contracting with a gov3 ernment entity or to the care of children, includ4 ing— 

5 (A) the suspension or revocation of an op6 erating license; and 

7 (B) any ongoing or pending investigation 

8 by the Federal Government or a State or local 

9 government. 

10 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

11 the Secretary of Health and Human Services. 

12 (3) UNACCOMPANIED ALIEN CHILD.—The term 

13 ‘‘unaccompanied alien child’’ has the meaning given 

14 the term in section 462(g) of the Homeland Security 

15 Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g)). 

16 (b) DISCLOSURE AND LICENSURE.—With respect to 

17 Office of Refugee Resettlement grants to open or fund 

18 shelter facilities for unaccompanied alien children, the 

19 Secretary shall require each applicant— 

20 (1) to disclose in the grant application any ad21 verse action taken against the applicant during the 

22 5-year period immediately preceding the date on 

23 which the application is submitted; and 

24 (2) to be licensed to operate such a facility in 

25 the applicable State as of such date. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3182 IS

1 (c) INFORMATION SHARING.—In considering an ap2 plication for a grant referred to in subsection (b), the Sec3 retary shall seek to collaborate with the appropriate regu4 latory agencies of the State in which the applicant intends 

5 to operate to conduct a review of State databases for infor6 mation on adverse actions taken against the applicant. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
& b 8

6 œ

> œ> œ> >œ. Allegro

f

œ œ

> œ> >œ. œ œ> œ> œ> œ> œ>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m.100, 2nd beat

fi

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ. 8

5

8

13

8

21

& b

8

29

Œ j

œ

.

œ

. œ

.

œ

. F

37 Str. Mute

 ̇. Œ Jœ

. œ. œ

. œ

.  ̇. 4

Œ j

œ

. œ

. œ

.

œ

. F

45

 ̇. Œ jœ

. œ. œ

.

œ

.

& b j

œ

.

‰ ‰ Œ. ‰ œ

.

œ

.

œ. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. 3

53

œ

.

œ

.

œ

.

œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ.

& b  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. !

61

‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ! ‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ. œ. œ J

œ

.  ̇.

& b j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ.

Open

Œ j

œ

. œ

. œ

.

œ

.

69

p

 ̇. Œ Jœ

. œ. œ

. œ

.  ̇. 4

Œ j

œ

. œ

. œ

.

œ

.

77

p

 ̇. Œ jœ

. œ. œ

.

œ

.

& b j

œ

.

‰ ‰ Œ. ‰ œ

.

œ

.

œ. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ

. œ

.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. 3

85

œ

.

œ

.

œ

.

œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ.

& b  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. !

93

‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ! ‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ. œ. œ J

œ

.  ̇.

& b

fi j

œ ‰ ‰

œ.

>

Ceremonial version,

from m.4

f

 ̇.

>

101

œ. œ.

>

 ̇.

>

J

œ ‰ ‰ œ œ œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰

œ.

>

 ̇.

>

109

& b œ j

#œ

- œ

- œ œ  ̇. œ ‰ œ œ J

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>

 ̇.

>

117

œ j

œ

> œ

>

j

œ

>

& b  ̇.

> œ ‰ œ nœ J

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ œ. > ̇. >

125

œ œ

> œ> œ

> œ

> œ

>

& b  ̇.

>

J

œ ‰ ‰nœ

>

J

œ œ. > œ. > œ. > œ.

> œ.> œ> œ>

ƒ 2

œ.

> œ> œ>

2

œ

>

J

œ

> œ> œ

>

2

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

The Official Song of the National Guard Bureau Words and Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

 40th Army Band, VTARNG

1st Bb Trumpet Dedicated to the Men and Women, Soldiers and Airmen of America's National Guard
#### Elderkin, Pl'ff in Error, *vs.*Winne at al., Def’ts in Error.

Where, by an article of agreement between two persons for carrying on a trade or business of a particular nature, and in the same instrument a third party joins with *one*of the other parties to carry ■on another trade or business for *their*separate account, the relation of partners is not created between the *three,*so as to enable a person dealing with either branch of the concern, to maintain an action against the whole.

*28The mere joining in the same instrument of two separate co-partnerships, where *all*are not interested in both, cannot create any greater liability, or constitute any other relation, than would result if the instrument creating the two co-partnerships had been separate and distinct, the one from the other.

This action was commenced before a Justice of Wal-worth county, and. the plaintiffs there declared as partners. The defendant pleaded in abatement the nonjoin-der of a third person as plaintiff. Upon that issue the Justice non-suited the plaintiffs.

The case was carried to the late District Court by cer-tiorari, and the District Judge reversed the judgment. Upon such reversal a writ of error was brought to this Court.

The parties submitted the case without argument.

*By the Court.*

Larrabbb, J.

This cause was submitted without argument. The defendants declared before the Justice as partners; and this being put in issue, was decided against them and judgment of non-suit rendered. This was reversed upon certiorari by the District Court.

The proof consisted of a written agreement to carry on the blacksmith business; one furnishing capital and the other labor; the profits and expenses to be divided equally.

In the same article was an agreement between Winne and one Margrat, to carry on the business of painting; and it was contended that this constituted a partnership between them all; and upon this ground judgment was rendered against the plaintiff below. In this the Justice was clearly wrong; as it is difficult to imagine upon what principle of law, or by what process of reasoning, Brown *29and Margrat were considered bound by the agreement, as partners. The contract of Winne with each, was a separate and independent one, for the carrying on of separate and independent branches of trade. The ratio of division of profits was different in each; and in no manner was Brown and Margrat to participate in the profits of each other’s labor, or furnish each other with capital.

The District Court very properly reversed the judgment and the Judgment of that Court must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.