alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                        SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Cliff Halling, certify that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB of
 Wrap-N-Roll USA,  Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a  material  fact  or  omit  to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect
to  the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all
material respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the  issuer  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented
in  this  report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for
the issuer and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
supervision, to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to me
by others within those entities,  particularly  during  the period in
which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated  the effectives of the issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  my conclusions about
the effectiveness of  the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
evaluation;  and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal
control over  financial  reporting  that  occurred during the period
covered by the Annual  Report  that  has  materially  affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially  affect, the issuer's internal control
over financial reporting; and

5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the issuer's  auditors  and  the
audit  committee  of  the  issuer's  board of directors  (or  persons
performing  the  equivalent  functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely  to  adversely  affect  the  issuer's  ability  to
record, process, summarize  and  report  financial  information;  and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.



     /s/ Cliff Halling
     President,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and
     Chief  Financial  Officer

     August  14,  2003
1491ll-I3-Pj

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP;ORTATION

Federal AviatiOD Administration

/2 1.3

"O''''''''~T''

~-

C--~

This condition, ifnot corrected, could result in a deterioration of the

structural integrity of the forward engine mount.

Airbus, in the frame crItic Extended Service Goal (ESG) exercise, has

demonstrated by post--eertification analysis iliat, among lhe types of yokes

in service, one component on the CF6-80C2 forward engine mounts

(skinny cast yoke) does not meet the Dcs'ign Service Goal (DSG)

requirements.

condilion as:

informalion (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl. describes lhe unsaf<

listed above. This proposed AD;resulls from mandatory continuing airworthiness

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). DOT.

Varianl F, and F4-605R Airplanes, and A31O-204 and +304 Airplanes

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to aqopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 84·601. 84-603, 84-605R. C4-60SR

RIN 2I2ll-AA64

2011- 'DD3S

JDocket No. F.<\.A-JOlD-"*'***; Directorate IdeotificT 201Q-NM-llO-ADj

14CFR Part 39

• • • • • • •

The unsafe condition is possible.separation of!he engine from the engine moum dunn_ •••••

flight. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-B9) :OFFlCL4L FILE COpy
II 

Calendar No. 276 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3103 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate the statute of limitations 

for the filing of a civil claim for any person who, while a minor, was 

a victim of a violation of section 1589, 1590, 1591, 2241(c), 2242, 

2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of such 

title. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2021 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. CORNYN, 

Mr. LEAHY, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. 

PADILLA, and Mr. OSSOFF) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

FEBRUARY 17, 2022 

Reported by Mr. DURBIN, with amendments 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate the 

statute of limitations for the filing of a civil claim for 

any person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of section 1589, 1590, 1591, 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 

2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 

of such title. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3103 RS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating Limits 

5 to Justice for Child Sex Abuse Victims Act of 2021 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. 

7 Section 2255 of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(b) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—There shall be no 

11 time limit for the filing of any a complaint commencing 

12 an action commenced under this section.’’. 

13 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICABILITY. 

14 This Act and the amendments made by this Act 

15 shall— 

16 (1) take effect on the date of enactment of this 

17 Act; and 

18 (2) apply to— 

19 (A) any claim or action that, as of the date 

20 described in paragraph (1), would not have 

21 been barred under section 2255(b) of title 18, 

22 United States Code, as it read on the day be23 fore the date of enactment of this Act; and 

24 (B) any claim or action arising after the 

25 date of enactment of this Act. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 276 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3103 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate 

2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of such title. 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, victim of a violation of section 1589, 1590, 1591, claim for any person who, while a minor, was a the statute of limitations for the filing of a civil 

FEBRUARY 17, 2022 

Reported with amendments 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
No. 2,382.

#### ABERDING *v.*MACHAM.

Rhodes, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court, Temple, J., Wallace, J., and Spbaoue, J., concurring:

Upon the authority of the People, *ex. rel.*San Francisco *v.*County Judge of San Francisco, decided at the present term, writ dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TRAVIS C. KNISLEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 197 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-11240

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHN HOKE BROOKER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-93-1

Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Hoke Brooker challenges his sentence of 63 months in prison,

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction to possession of counterfeit

obligations, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. Brooker contends that his sentence,

an upward departure or variance from the advisory sentencing guidelines range

of 24 to 30 months, was substantively unreasonable.

Following United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), our review of

sentences is for reasonableness in light of the sentencing factors set forth in

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 29, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-11240 Document: 00512035692 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/29/2012
No. 11-11240

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 518-19 (5th Cir.

2005). When the district court has imposed a sentence that varies from the

guidelines range, reasonableness review requires that we evaluate whether the

sentence “unreasonably fails to reflect the statutory sentencing factors” set forth

in § 3553(a). United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 708 (5th Cir. 2006). 

The record indicates that the district court properly considered the

§ 3553(a) factors. The 63-month sentence reflected the seriousness of Brooker’s

offense, the need to promote respect for the law, the need to provide just

punishment, and the need to protect the public from future crimes. The sentence

imposed was reasonable “under the totality of the relevant statutory factors.” 

United States v. Jones, 444 F.3d 430, 441 (5th Cir. 2006). Brooker’s

disagreement with the sentence and the district court’s weighing of the § 3553(a)

factors is insufficient to show the court abused its discretion. See United States

v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 807 (5th Cir.2008). Along that line, the

sentence was 33 months above the top of the advisory guidelines sentencing

range. Our court has upheld variances considerably greater than the increase

to Brooker’s sentence. E.g., United States v. Brantley, 537 F.3d 347, 349-50 (5th

Cir. 2008); United States v. Smith, 417 F.3d 483, 492-93 (5th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 11-11240 Document: 00512035692 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/29/2012
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Everyday   Assembly
Productions, Inc., on Form 10- QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  Daniel L.  Hodges,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2005


/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                              STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Darryl Cohen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ocean
West Holding Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(a)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2006, to which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic
      Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Dated: August 22, 2006

                                                   /s/ Darryl Cohen
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Darryl Cohen,
                                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ocean West Holding
Corporation and will be retained by Ocean West Holding Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# condition/cornCond24w15.tfw

# condition/cornCond24w15.tif

# condition/cornCond24w15.tif.aux.xml

# condition/cornCond24w15.tif.ovr

# condition/cornCond24w15.tif.xml

# progress/cornProg24w15.tfw

# progress/cornProg24w15.tif

# progress/cornProg24w15.tif.aux.xml

# progress/cornProg24w15.tif.ovr

# progress/cornProg24w15.tif.xml
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-05439) of Infinium Software, Inc. of our report
dated November 17, 2000 relating to the financial statements, which appears in
the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated December 18, 2000 relating to the financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 22, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN COLBERT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 181 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Renewal of Law Firm Agreement



 Exhibit 10.24 
 RENEWAL OF LAW FIRM ENGAGEMENT 
 AGREEMENT 

This Agreement (this “Agreement”) entered into in the City of Jacksonville and State of Florida between Stein
Mart, Inc., a Florida corporation and its divisions, subsidiaries and affiliates (the “Company”), and KIRSCHNER & LEGLER, P.A. (which, together with its president, Mitchell W. Legler, “Legler”,
and with Legler and Kirschner & Legler, P.A. collectively called the “Firm”), is made as of April 1, 2013 (the “Effective Date”). 

Background 
 The parties entered into a Law Firm Engagement Agreement dated April 1, 2011 (the “Existing Agreement”) which expires by its terms on March 31, 2013. The parties with to renew
the Existing Agreement on the terms provided below. 
 In consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein,
the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: 
  

	 	SECTION 1.	TERM OF ENGAGEMENT 

 (a) Term. Section I (a) of the Existing Agreement is hereby modified to read in its entirety as follows: “The Company agrees to employ the Firm, and the Firm agrees to be employed by the
Company, for a period of two (2) year(s) beginning on the April 1, 2013 and ending on March 31, 2015 (the “Term”).” 
 (b) Compensation. Section 4(a) of the Existing Agreement is hereby modified to increase the annual compensation from $180,000 to $200,000. 

 

	 	SECTION 2.	RATIFICATION 

 (a) Agreement Continuing. Except as expressly modified as provided above, the Existing Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 

(b) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original, but all
of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Firm have
executed this Agreement effective as of the Effective Date. 
  

									
	STEIN MART, INC.	 		 	KIRSCHNER & LEGLER, P.A.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ D. Hunt Hawkins
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Mitchell W. Legler

	Name:	 	David H. Hawkins, EVP-COO	 		 		 	Mitchell W. Legler, President
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, Steven D.Overly certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NUI Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004

                                                               /s/Steven D. Overly                                                                   Steven D. Overly                                                     Vice President,Chief Financial Officer,                                                            General Counsel andSecretary
& b 8

6 œ.

> bœ.

>

Allegro

f œ.

> #œ.

> nœ>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

nœ

>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m.100, 2nd beat

fi

J

œ

^ ‰ ‰ Œ. 6 5

Œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ. J

œ ‰ ‰

13 5

& b Œ j

œ #œ jœ

f

 ̇. Œ j

œ #œ jœ

21

F

œ Jœnœ Jœ œ j

œ #œ jœ œ. j

œ ‰ ‰

2

Œ Jœ œ Jœ

f

 ̇. ‰ œ

>

œ

>

œ. > 29

& b  ̇. ‰ œ

>

œ

>

œ.

>  ̇. ‰ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ

œ œ œ œ œ J

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. 37 6

Œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ

& b œ. J

œ ‰ ‰

45 5

Œ j

œ #œ jœ

f

 ̇. Œ j

œ #œ jœ

53

F

œ Jœnœ Jœ œ j

œ #œ jœ œ. j

œ ‰ ‰

2

& b Œ J

œ œ Jœ

f

 ̇. ‰ œ

>

œ

>

œ. > 61 ̇. ‰ œ

>

œ

>

œ.

>  ̇. ‰ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ

œ œ œ œ œ J

œ ‰ ‰ Œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Official Song of the National Guard Bureau

Baritone T.C. Words and Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

40th Army Band, VTARNG

& b

6 69

Œ J

œ#œ Jœ

f

œ Jœ œ Jœ œ. J

œ ‰ ‰

77 5

Œ j

œ #œ jœ

f

 ̇. Œ j

œ #œ jœ

85

F

œ Jœnœ Jœ

& b œ j

œ #œ jœ œ. j

œ ‰ ‰

2

Œ Jœ œ Jœ

f

 ̇. ‰ œ

>

œ

>

œ. > 93 ̇. ‰ œ

>

œ

>

œ.

>  ̇. ‰ œ œ œ œ œ

& b œ œ œ œ œ œ œ

œ œ œ œ œ fiJ

œ ‰ ‰ Œ.

Ceremonial version,

from m.4

‰ œ

- œ- œ œ œ

- 101

F

œ J

œ œ J

œ œ. œ. œ œ

- œ

- œ j

œ

- œ œ œ

- œ œ œ

- œ

- œ œ œ œ œ

& b œ J

œ œ J

œ œ. J

œ ‰ ‰ ‰ œ

- œ

- œ œ œ

- 109

œ J

œ œ J

œ œ. œ œ

- œ

- œ. J

œ ‰ ‰ œ

- œ œ œ œ œ œ

-

œ œ œ œ œ œ J

œ œ J

œ

& b J

œ

‰ ‰ Œ. ‰ œ

- œ- œ œ œ

- 117

œ J

œ œ J

œ œ. œ. œ œ

- œ

- œ j

œ

- œ

- œ œ œ œ œ œ

- œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ

& b œ. J

œ ‰ ‰ ‰ œ

>œ>>œ. 125

f

œ. Jœ ‰ ‰ ‰ œ

>œ>>œ. J

œ ‰ ‰

>œ. œ

>œ

>œ

>œ

>

J

œ

>

ƒ

œ

>

J

œ

>œ. > J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ. 2

j

œ

^ ‰ ‰ Œ.

ƒ

2 ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

-Baritone T.C.-
SUN BANCSHARES, INC.
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      905 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully
complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.

This 13th day of August, 2002.


/s/  THOMAS BOUCHETTE
------------------------
Thomas Bouchette
President & Chief Executive Officer

/s/ RANDY L. CARMON
------------------------
Randy L. Carmon
Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
<PAGE>
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Vernon Lee Willis Jr.

, * From the County Court

of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. 1700356

.

Vs. No. 11

- 20

- 00 083

- CR * March 24, 2022

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams , J.

(P anel consists of: Trotter, J.,

W illiams, J. , and Wright, S.C.J.

, sitting by assignment )

(Bailey, C.J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and we render a judgment of acquittal.