alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: January 24, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 15)]
[Notices]               
[Page 4123]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24ja11-72]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

 
Public Availability of DHS Fiscal Year 2010 Service Contract 
Inventory

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is publishing this notice to 
advise the public of the availability of the FY 2010 Service Contract 
inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2010. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed 
throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance 
with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management 
and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's 
guidance is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf. DHS has posted its inventory for public review at: http://www.dhs.gov/xopnbiz/regulations/editorial_0504.shtm under 
``Acquisition Reports and Notices.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this notice, 
please contact Gail Carter at Gail.A.Carter1@dhs.gov or telephone 202-
447-5302.

Richard Gunderson,
Deputy Chief Procurement Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-1351 Filed 1-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9B-P
```
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA - 2014 - 0620 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM238AD

A330 - 57A3096, R04 --- 2/6/13 A330 - 57A3096, R03 --- 10/24/12 A330 - 57A3096, R02 --- 8/13/07 A330 - 57A3096, R01 --- 4/18/07 A340 - 57A4104, R03 --- 10/24/12 A340 - 57A4104, R02 --- 9/5/07 A340 - 57A4104, R01 --- 8/13/07 A340 - 57 A5009, R02 --- 10/24/12 A340 - 57A5009, R01 --- 8/13/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23a

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Linens 'n Things, Inc:

We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
Numbers 333-71903, 333-42874, 333-55803, 333-62982 and 333-62984 on Form S-8 of
Linens 'n Things, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated February 4, 2003,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Linens 'n Things, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of January 4, 2003 and December 29, 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended January 4, 2003, which report
appears in the January 4, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Linens 'n Things,
Inc.

Our report dated February 4, 2003 refers to the adoption of the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets", effective December 30, 2001.


/S/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP

New York, New York
April 4, 2003
#### HENRY HEIDENHEIM, Plaintiff in Error, *vs.*JAMES M. SPRAGUE, Defendant in Error.

ERROR TO ROOK CIRCUIT COURT

"WTiefe suit is commenced by filing a declaration- and service of s a copy, the service . -'of the copy and notice to plead, is regarded as the process to bring the defendant into court.

Error or mistake in process or a copy thereof; is not cause of demurrer.

When suit is commenced by filing declaration and service of copy and' notice of rule to plead; the declaration, being upon promissory note, a copy.of which was an- -• .nexed, but in the copy served the date of the note was omitted, and the defend- . ant appeared and demurred; Held, that as the declaration and copy of note filed were correct, and showed a good cause of action, the demurrer should be overruled.

The demurrer in such case is to the declaration on file, not to the copy served.

■ Demurrer does not lie to process.

*By the Court,*

Smith, J.

This was an action of assumpsit com-inenced by the plaintiff in-error, against the defendant in error, by service of declaration.

The declaration contained the common counts, with a copy of a:'note and a notice that -the note would be given in evidence under' the money counts, and was the only cause of action ;• the copy of the note on the declaration on file is as follows:

> “$130.00. *Racine, Aug.*8, 1856.

> “ Thirty days after date, for value received, I promise to pay G. D. Fellows or bearer, one hundred and thirty dollars; ten per cent, interest, at Racine County Bank.

> (Signed) “ J. M. SpRAGUE.”

The sheriff served a copy of the declaration on the 20th of September, on the defendant, with a copy of the note, except the date, which was accidentally omitted.

*259On tbe lOtb day of October the defendant appeared, by bis attorneys, and demurred to the declaration; assigning for causes;

1. That it does not appear that the promissory note,- a copy whereof is given, was due and payable at the time of the commencement of the suit.

2. That it appears that the plaintiff’s only cause of action is, a written promise to pay a certain sum in thirty days after date, and said promise has no date, and hence is not evidence under the money counts.

The court below sustained the demurrer and rendered judgment for the defendant; to reverse which, this writ of error is sued out.

There is no doubt that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer. The defendant demurred to the declaration on file,, not to .the copy served upon him. The declaration on file is good, and none of the causes of demurrer assigned, apply to it. The copy served upon the defendant was merely the process to bring him into court, and error in process or. copy thereof, is not cause of demurrer. If the process or the copy was irregular or defective, there was a proper mode of rendering such defect or irregularity available to the defendant. But a demurrer was not the proper mode.

The declaration on file being good, and the. demurrer being to-the declaration on file, the record shows no defect, and the demurrer should have been overruled. .

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
# Washington Guard Assists with Collegiate Cyber Competition

/ Published April 1, 2024

CAMP MURRAY, Wash. - Washington Army National Guard Soldiers supported the 16th Annual Pacific Rim Regional Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition at South Puget Sound Community College March 22-24.

“Events like PRCCDC are critical for bridging the gap between academic theory and real-world cyber threats,” said Maj. Sameer Puri, chief information officer, Washington Army National Guard. “It also fosters collaboration between academia and military experts to enhance cybersecurity readiness for our state and nation. “

Puri said the collaboration also enables students “to seek career opportunities within the Washington Army National Guard, further blending professional development with national service.”

Twelve Department of Information Management team Soldiers participated as competition officials and opposing forces. Washington Army National Guard Soldiers coach and mentor the students.

“You must be prepared and almost predict what will happen after you run a program/script/exploit so that you can maximize your time on the Local Area Network while you have it,” said Sgt. 1st Class Lance Shimamoto, information technician chief, Washington Army National Guard. “Life is short, and so are shell sessions.”

The three-day event focused on the operational aspects of managing and protecting a commercial network. The competition allowed students and industry professionals to interact and discuss the security and operational challenges students will face as they enter the job market. It also raises awareness of the Guard’s role in cyber defense.

“PRCCDC staff was greatly appreciative of our efforts and volunteers for all the Soldiers from the Washington Army National Guard,” said Staff Sgt. William Fritts, a judge for the event.

The Pacific Rim Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition enables students from two- and four-year colleges and universities to develop their cybersecurity and information security abilities. Participants attempt to maintain a secure corporate network, with successful teams moving on to the National Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition.

“The experience was a blast, being able to work with professionals in the industry to get the feel of being on an actual ‘Red’ team,” said 1st Sgt. Daniel Papp, senior system administrator.

The Washington Army National Guard has participated with the college staff for over a decade.

“We look forward each year for our Soldiers to integrate, perform functions, and build confidence that reminds them of the level they perform (on a) daily basis for the Guard,” said Chief Warrant Officer 5 Michael Olmsted, deputy chief information officer. “To be able to interact with college students and provide their knowledge of the Army National Guard and potential growth opportunities as Citizen-Soldiers, it is also a great recruiting event.”

The Washington National Guard’s cyber program is nationally recognized for its partnership with Washington’s Secretary of State’s office to help secure the state’s election system and the infrastructure vulnerability assessments completed with utility companies across the state.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of RADVision Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gad
Tamari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/Gad Tamari*
--------------
Gad Tamari
Chief Executive Officer

November 8, 2004

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Lexent Inc. (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kevin OKane, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |     |                 
| | --- | ----------------
| | By: | /s/ KEVIN OKANE

| |                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | ______________________________________ 
     Kevin OKane
| | Chief Executive Officer                                  

Date: May 2, 2003

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Lexent Inc.
and will be retained by Lexent Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 [File No. 333-214553, 333-214554, and 333-217963]of our report dated April 2, 2018 with respect to the audited consolidated financial statements of Protagenic Therapeutics, Inc.for the year ended December 31, 2017. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continueas a going concern.

 

*/s/MaloneBailey, LLP*

www.malonebailey.com

Houston,Texas

April2, 2018
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OLXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of SPACEHAB, Incorporated (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the report), I, Michael E. Kearney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ Michael E. Kearney           
|Michael E. Kearney, President and
|Chief Executive Officer          
|September 27, 2004               



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1237

ZOLY SOS,

Petitioner,

versus

T & C COAL COMPANY; WEST VIRGINIA COAL

WORKERS' PNEUMOCONIOSIS FUND, INCORPORATED;

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(95-1323-BLA)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 13, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zoly Sos, Petitioner Pro Se. Konstantine Keian Weld, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia;

Cathryn Celeste Helm, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Sos v.T&C

Coal Co., No. 95-1323-BLA (B.R.B. Jan. 23, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ANTHONEE PATTERSON,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH SHELTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 362 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of November, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates II L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 19, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.7

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Asuka Nakahara and William P. Leiser the true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him
and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997, and to sign any or all amendments to
such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, each of them
with or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                                   /s/ ROBERT E. SULENTIC
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Robert E. Sulentic


Dated:    March 31, 1998
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0499 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-061-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 430 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 5 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The proposed actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of a control tube bonded 

clevis, which could lead to failure of the control tube and subsequent loss of helicopter control.

Costs:

We estimate that labor costs average $85 a work hour. Based on this estimate, we expect the 

following costs:

 The cost of inspecting the control tube would be minimal.

 Repairing the control tube would require 2 work-hours for a labor cost of $170.

 Replacing control tube, P/N 430-001-007-101, with control tube, P/N 430-001-007-

105, would require 3 work-hours for a labor cost of $255. Parts would cost $3,974 for a total cost 

per helicopter of $4,229. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Fuller
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Richard N. Nottenburg, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):



Date: August 3, 2010/s/ RICHARD N. NOTTENBURG Richard N. Nottenburg President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks