alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 314 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 314

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2022

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
             To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Repeal 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    Public Law 89-224 (commonly known as the ``Klamath Tribe Judgment 
Fund Act'') (79 Stat. 897) is repealed.

SEC. 3. DISBURSEMENT OF REMAINING FUNDS.

    Notwithstanding any provision of Public Law 89-224 (79 Stat. 897) 
(as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) 
relating to the distribution or use of funds, as soon as practicable 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall disburse to the Klamath Tribe the balance of any funds that, on 
or before the date of enactment of this Act, were appropriated or 
deposited into the trust accounts for remaining legal fees and 
administration and per capita trust accounts, as identified by the 
Secretary of the Interior, under that Act (as in effect on the day 
before the date of enactment of this Act).

            Passed the Senate May 26, 2021.

            Attest:

                                            SONCERIA ANN BERRY,

                                                             Secretary.
```
### Re: HPV2 CASRN 68479-98-1 Albemarle data for review ( Docket reference 2007-0531-0677) 5 attachments Chuantung Lin to: Paul Campanella 09/06/2012 03:18 PM

Cc: John Schaeffer, Kathy Calvo, Marcus Aguilar, Tracy Williamson, Myrta Christian



### Hi Paul,

The subject line indicated there were 5 attachments , but only three were attached in this email. Do I miss any attachment?

Regarding these three test results from the testing of Vapor Pressure (V.P.), Log Kow, and Water Solubility endpoints, all the tested results and the test methods used in each endpoint testing are reviewed and they are adequate and acceptable to EPA to fulfill the test requirements for these three endpoints.

Please let me know If you have any question regarding this matter. Thanks!

Daniel

_

____________________________________________ _ Dr. Daniel Chuantung Lin Industrial Chemistry Branch Office of Chemicals Safety and Pollution Prevention US EPA 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (7406M) Washington, DC 20460

[Deliveries to: 1201 Constitution Ave., NW, EPA East, Room#:5133E, Washington, DC 20460]

202-564-8584 (direct) 202-564-8740 (branch) 202-564-8679 (fax)

Paul Campanella 09/06/2012 12:35:40 PM Daniel, Please review the attached data submiss...

From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US To: Chuantung Lin/DC/USEPA/US Cc: John Schaeffer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marcus Aguilar/DC/USEPA/US, Kathy Calvo/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 09/06/2012 12:35 PM Subject: HPV2 CASRN 68479-98-1 Albemarle data for review ( Docket reference 2007-0531-0677) 5 attachments



### Daniel, Please review the attached data submission and give us your opinion regarding the adequacy of the data for the test rule. Thanks

A lbemarle A5 Water Solubility.pd f

lbemarle Solubility.pd A lbemarle A3 Vapor Pressure .pd f lbemarle Pressure A lbemarle A4 Octanol water.pd f lbemarle Octanol water.pd



### Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D.

### Chemical Information and Testin g Branch Chemical Control Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 202-564-8091
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jon A. DeLuca, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 29, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald Heineman,  the Chief Executive Officer of Resolve Staffing,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the fiscal
            quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated: November 8, 2004


                                                  /s/ Ronald Heineman
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Ronald Heineman
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sonic Innovations, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen L. Wilson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sonic Innovations, Inc., certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sonic Innovations, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      |  | /s/    STEPHEN L. WILSON
|Name: |  | Stephen L. Wilson       
|Date: |  | November 9, 2004        



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Sonic Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by Sonic Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*Laurens, Washington District.*

Heard by Chancellor James.

#### Executors of Hasting Dial *vs.*John Rogers.

cashsr^.

Bill for an account *by*tlie representatives of a deceased co-partnef in a particular line of business. The answer admits tlie partnership, but states that a settlement had taken place with the deceased. This being'corroborated by evidence of the declarations, of the deceased, die bill must be dismissed.

The complainants state that their - te afor entered into copartnership with the defendant to survey lands, and.-#* to divide equally the profits of the sale of , sack lands between them. That defendant did survey certain lands., *176and obtain grants for the same, and that the expenses-of such grants were paid by Dial, the testator. That the defendant has sold said lands, and refuses to account the complainants. Therefore, the bill prays that ffiay account and pay over to the executors, one half the amount of the sales.

*175JUNE, 1811

*176The answer admits the copartnership upon the con* dition,s stated in the bilí, that certain lands were granted to the defendant and the expenses paid by Dial. That defendant sold the lands ; and defendant states, that he has fully settled with Dial, the testator, for the same.

This statement in the answer, of having settled, with the testator, has also been supported by the evidence of Maj. Downs and Gen. Wolf, who have sworn, that Dial, the testator, told them, that the defendant had settled all matters, and that he, the testator, claimed no land.

The complainants offered the evidence of James Bumpass, taken under commission, and the testimony of James Dial, the son of the testator, sworn on his voir-dire, but neither of these appeared to contradict the evidence of the two witnesses, Downs and Wolf.

* Therefore, as the testimony on the part of . the defendant evidently preponderates, let the complainant’s bill be dismissed with costs.

W. James.

Grcswell for appellant. — Farrow for respondent..

From this decree there was an appeal which was heard by the chancellors James, Thompson, Desaus-imre and Gaillard; and the decree was affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independent Asset Management Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ AnthonyDeMint                                  

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

August 10, 2005
<PAGE>

                                    ADDENDUM


         This Addendum amends that certain Employment Agreement dated June 5,
1998, effective May 1, 1998, by and between JOSHUA GINDIN and NCO FINANCIAL
SYSTEMS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation replacing NCO GROUP. INC. as named
employer (the "Agreement"), and this Addendum shall be effective as of January
1, 1999 (the "Effective Date").

          For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
 which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 1        Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is amended by deleting the text of such
          paragraph in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

          "The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of five (5) years,
          commencing on the Effective Date and terminating on December 31, 2003,
          subject to any early termination provisions set forth in the
          Agreement."

2.        Paragraph A of Exhibit "A" of the Agreement is amended by providing
          for a Base Salary of $200,000 per annum, commencing on the Effective
          Date. The Base Salary shall, at a minimum, be adjusted annually, on
          the anniversary date of the Effective Date pursuant to the CPI then in
          effect for the Philadelphia metropolitan area. The Base Salary shall
          be payable in installments, in arrears, in accordance with the
          Company's regular payroll practices, but not less often than monthly.

 3.       In the event any term or condition of this Addendum is inconsistent
          with any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms of this
          Addendum will control. Except as stated above, all the terms and
          conditions of the Agreement, including all restrictions and covenants,
          shall remain In full force and effect and are incorporated herein by
          reference as though set forth at length.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum to become
effective on the Effective Date.

 NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.


By:
    --------------------------                    -----------------------------
                                                  Joshua Gindin
#### Elderkin, Pl’ff in Error, *vs.*Spurbeck, Def't in Error.

A Justice has no jurisdiction of a cause, when the plaintiff sets up and claims a sum superior to the jurisdiction of the Justice, to render Judgment. And if that fact appears by tho claim set up by the plaintiff in his declaration, jurisdiction does not attach.

In such a case, and whore for want of jurisdiction, tho Justico dismisses tho cause, it is error for him to award costs as against the plaintiff.

Not possessing jurisdiction to try the cause, the Justico has not, on dismissing it, jurisdiction to award costs for any purposo.

On a *certiorari*to tho Circuit Court upon a judgment rondored for costs by tho Justice in such a case, if the Circuit Judge affirms the judgment, this . Court will reverse it on error.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff in error, against the defendant in error, before a Justice of Wal-worth County; and the plaintiff below having declared for, and claimed of the defendant below, a sum superior to the amount for which the Justice had jurisdiction to render judgment, on a motion for the dismissal of the cause, the Justice granted it.

On a *certiorari*brought *to*the late District Court the judgment of the Justice was reversed, and upon such.reversal a writ of error was brought.

The cause was submitted to the Court without argument.

*ElderJcin,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*70
      *Kelsey fy Gale,*for Defendant m Error.

*By the Court.*

Jackson, J.

There are but two questions that properly arise in this cause. First, had the Justice before whom the cause was commenced any jurisdiction *1*Secondly, conceding the Justice had no jurisdiction, were .costs properly awarded against the plaintiff?

The first question can readily be answered by reference to the declaration; from which it is manifest that the plaintiff seeks a recovery for the price of a horse valued at seventy-three dollars, and for the expenses incurred in his keeping, &c., amounting to the further sum of ■twenty-five dollars. It is clear, therefore, that the Justice liad no jurisdiction, 'the “debt or the sum claimed” by the defendant exceeding fifty dollars.

The second question, we thipk is equally free from doubt. It is a well settled principle,, that where an action is dismissed for want of jurisdiction in the Court, *whether*it be a Court of limited o,r superior jurisdiction, no costs can properly be awarded, *2 Mass. Rep., 207.*

And although the Justice before whom this cause wap. brought, very properly dismissed it for want of jurisdiction, yet, as the v^ant of jurisdiction deprived him, of the power to award judgment for costs against the plaintiff, the District Court, to which this cause was brought up by *certiorari,*should for this, reason, have reversed instead of affirmed, the judgment of the -Justice.

The judgment of the- District; Courf is, therefore re? versed with costs.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 CenterPoint Energy, Inc. 
 Summary of Certain Compensation Arrangements

 Payable to the Executive Chairman of the Board 

The following is a summary of certain compensation arrangements payable to Milton Carroll, the Executive Chairman of the Board of
Directors (the “Board”) of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (the “Company”), effective as of June 1, 2013. 
  

	 	•	 	 An annual salary of $450,000 commencing June 1, 2013 and continuing thereafter until the earlier of May 31, 2016 or the termination of
Mr. Carroll’s service as Executive Chairman of the Board and payable on a monthly or semi-monthly basis. 


  

	 	•	 	 An annual award of 30,000 shares of common stock to be made during the period commencing on June 1, 2013 and continuing until the earlier of
May 31, 2016 or the termination of Mr. Carroll’s service as Executive Chairman of the Board, with each such award payable on June 1, 2013, June 1, 2014 and June 1, 2015, respectively.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces a meeting for the initial review of applications in response to (FOA) DP15-001, Natural Experiments of the Impact of Population-targeted Health Policies to Prevent Diabetes and its Complications.

*Time And Date:*                     11 a.m.-6 p.m., May 5-6, 2015 (Closed).                

*Place:*                     Teleconference.                

*Status:*                     The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                

*Matters For Discussion:*                     The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Natural Experiments of the Impact of Population-targeted Health Policies to Prevent Diabetes and its Complications, DP15-001, initial review.”                

*Contact Person For More Information:*                     Brenda Colley Gilbert, Ph.D., M.S.P.H., Director, Extramural Research Program Operations and Services, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE., Mailstop F-80, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-6295,                     *BJC4@cdc.gov.*

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Catherine Ramadei,

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2015-07997 Filed 4-7-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barry D. Elkins, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of Direct General Corporation on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Direct General Corporation.

    March 16, 2005     By: /s/ Barry D. Elkins
--------------------       -----------------------------------------------------
        Date                                     (Signature)
                       Name: Barry D. Elkins
                       Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer