alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

IndependentAuditors’ Consent

 

 

TheBoard of Directors

SanchezComputer Associates, Inc.

 

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on FormS-3 (No. 333-57567) and in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-21247, 333-57717, 333-69442 and 333-58430) of Sanchez Computer Associates,Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2004, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, shareholders’ equity and other comprehensive income (loss) and cashflows for the years then ended and the related financial statement schedule,which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K ofSanchez Computer Associates, Inc.

 

Ourreport refers to our audit of the adjustments that were applied and disclosuresthat were added to revise the 2001 consolidated financial statements, as morefully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.  However, we were not engaged to audit,review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 consolidated financial statementsother than with respect to such adjustments and disclosures.

 

** **
|   | /s/ KPMG LLP |
|--------|--------------|

 

Philadelphia,Pennsylvania

March15, 2004

 

----
#### Jenkins vs. Esterly.

*Motion to set aside judgment*— *Waiver.*

A motion to set aside a Judgment for a mere irregularity, sliould be made promptly, and the right is waived by taking an appeal.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Jefferson*County.

A judgment in favor of defendant, upon the report of a referee, was entered in this cause in March, 1867 ; and, on appeal to this court, one of the grounds relied upon to reverse it was, that no notice of the motion for judgment had been served on the plaintiff. This court held that such notice should have been given, but that *341plaintiff should have taken advantage of the irregularity by applying to the circuit court to set aside the judgment; and it affirmed the judgment. (22 Wis. 128-131.) A motion for a rehearing in that case was denied; and, after the cause had finally been remitted, the circuit court, on plaintiff’s motion, set the judgment aside, on the ground that it was entered irregularly. From this order the defendant appealed.

*MwrpTiey & CravatTi,*for appellant.

*F. W. Monteiih*and *Wing & Gage,*for respondent.

Paute, J.

The motion to set aside the judgment for irregularity should have been denied, because it was made too late. It was made more than a year after the judgment was entered. To warrant the setting aside of a judgment for a mere technical irregularity, the party should be prompt in moving so soon as he has actual knowledge of the judgment. He must do it before he takes any subsequent step in the cause. Here he took an appeal from the judgment, which is itself a subsequent step. And it was only after his failure to reverse the judgment on appeal, that he resorted to this motion. Instead of the appeal, therefore, constituting an excuse for the delay, it constituted a waiver of the irregularity. For, unless the judgment was regular, the party ought to have moved, instead of appealing. That such a motion must be promptly made at the first opportunity, see *Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. McCormick et*al., 20 Wis. 265; *Patterson v.*Graves, 11 How. Pr. 91; *Jones v. U. S. Slate Co.,*16 How. Pr. 129.

*By the Court.*— The order is reversed, with costs.
MARCH CROP PRODUCTION

Executive Summary

March 9, 2012 8:30 AM

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service
USDA-NASS 

3-9-12

Contents

Field Crops Fruits/Nuts

Sugarcane Citrus
USDA-NASS 

3-9-12

March 2012 Crop Production

Crop Unit

March

2012

% Change

from 

Previous

Forecast

% Change

from 

Previous

Season

Oranges Mil Tons 9.00 + 0.7 + 1.7

Grapefruit Mil Tons 1.13 NC - 10.4

Tangerines and 

 Mandarins Thou Tons 624 NC - 0.8

Tangelos Thou Tons 52.0 + 4.0 NC

Sugarcane Mil Tons 29.3 + 2.3 + 7.1
USDA-NASS 

3-9-12

Upcoming Reports 

March 29 Agricultural Prices

March 30 Prospective Plantings

Grain Stocks

Rice Stocks

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

April 10 Crop Production

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service
USDA-NASS 

3-9-12

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

202-720-2127

800-727-9540

nass@nass.usda.gov
Upland Cotton 2022

Yield Per Harvested Acre by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Pounds Per Acre

Not Estimated

< 500

500 - 699

700 - 899

900 - 1,099

1,100 - 1,299

1,300 +
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




The Board
of Directors of


Atrinsic,
Inc.:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-145933 and 333-164465 on Form S-8 of Atrinsic, Inc. and subsidiaries of our
report dated March 30, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Atrinsic, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, equity, comprehensive loss, and
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009,
which report appears in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Atrinsic, Inc. and subsidiaries.




/s/ KPMG
LLP




New York,
New York




March 30,
2010





EX-4
EXHIBIT 24.10

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E. Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, Arlin E. Gaffner and J. Christopher
Kirk and each of them, her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for her and in her name, place and stead, to sign on her
behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2001, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

| |  | /s/REBECCA A. MCDONALDRebecca A. McDonald
| |  | -----------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
GERRARD D. JONES,

Appellant,

v.

KARA L. MACK, AND FDOC., 

ET AL.,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2974

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Gerrard D. Jones, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kenneth S. Steely, General 

Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal shall be dismissed as premature. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l). 

The order appealed merely denied appellant’s motion to accept a May 26, 2016, 

addendum to the pending petition for writ of habeas corpus as an amended petition 

in compliance with the May 27, 2016, “Order Directing Plaintiff/Petitioner to File 
2

an Amended Complaint/Petition.” The order is not final because it does not 

constitute an end to the judicial labor in the cause. Augustin v. Blount, 573 So. 2d 

104, 105 (Fla 1st DCA 1991). If appellant is unwilling or unable to file an 

amended petition, the proper course is to request entry of a final order that may be 

appealed. Id. 

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2016290EN.01000601.xml

| 10.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 August 2016

(2016/C 290/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1078 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4367 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85399 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4875 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0899 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3570 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,027 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,37 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2669 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4598 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3015 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4463 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4567 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5950 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5522 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4931 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 224,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0072 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3798 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4855 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 547,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4668 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,944 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,7804 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,737 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5045 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,5015 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,0990 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1078

JPY

Japanese yen

113,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4367

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85399

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4875

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0899

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3570

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,027

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,37

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2669

RON

Romanian leu

4,4598

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3015

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4463

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4567

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5950

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5522

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4931

KRW

South Korean won

1 224,66

ZAR

South African rand

15,0072

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3798

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4855

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 547,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4668

PHP

Philippine peso

51,944

RUB

Russian rouble

71,7804

THB

Thai baht

38,737

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5045

MXN

Mexican peso

20,5015

INR

Indian rupee

74,0990

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

***Certificate of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

** **

I, Bjorn D. Jawerth, certify that:

1.                Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Summus, Inc. (USA)(“Summus”);

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Summus as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report.

4.                Summus’ other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Summus and have:

a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Summus, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;

b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of Summus’ disclosure control’s andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.  Disclosed in this report any change in Summus’ internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Summus’ most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, Summus’ internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                Summus’ other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Summus’auditors and the audit committee of Summus’ board of directors:

a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Summus’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in Summus’ internal control over financial reporting.

  

Date:     November 12, 2003

 

/s/ Bjorn D. JawerthBjorn D. Jawerth, Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 23

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Mazel Stores, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-32275 on Form S-8 of Mazel Stores, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Mazel Stores, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of January 30, 1999 and January 31, 1998 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and partners'
capital and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
January 30, 1999, which report appears in the January 30, 1999 Form 10-K of
Mazel Stores, Inc.


KPMG LLP
Cleveland, Ohio


April 21, 1999
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               |   |                                                                                                                     |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |   |                                                                                                                     |   |
| July      15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Robert      Cheney                                                                               |   |
|               |   | Chief      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive and      Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |
|               |   |                                                                                                                     |   |
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Innovation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marlene C. Schluter, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 1, 2005

*/s/ Marlene C. Schluter*
  Marlene C. Schluter, Director, 
  Principal Financial Officer

---
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Hugh Grenfal, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Camden
Mines Limited for the quarter ending March 31,2004

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report.

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
we have:

a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;

b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) 	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) 	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls;

and
b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and

6. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 14th of May, 2004


/s/

Hugh Grenfal
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
#### In re Sale of Fourth Ward School

*Carl A. Belin, Jr.,*for Rowles.

*F. Denning Gearhart,*for Cebular.

*Michael*P. *Yeager,*for School District.

October 16, 1979

REILLY, P.J.,

This matter arises out of the attempt of the Clearfield Area School District to dispose of real estate by sealed bids. The facts of the matter are well set forth in previous pleadings and the court’s initial *462memorandum and order. The matter is now before this court for disposition on an action for declaratory judgment filed on behalf of one of the bidders, Theodore Rowles and Lois Rowles, his wife, in which they demand that the sale to John Cebular be set aside and the school district directed to commence anew its efforts to dispose of the subject property for the reason that the provisions of the Act of March 10, 1949, P.L. 30, art. VII, §707, as amended, 24 P.S. §7-707, have not been complied with.

Specifically, the Rowles claim that subsection 2 of the above-cited act requires the initial motion or resolution to set forth the terms and conditions of the sale and that, in the instant proceedings, the initial motion or resolution did not do so. This court agrees. The section in question reads as follows: “(2) Upon sealed bids requested by the school board, notice of the request for sealed bids to be given as provided in clause (1) of this section. Terms and conditions of sale shall be fixed by the board in the motion or resolution authorizing the request for sealed bids.” The school board in its minutes of January 22, 1979, in an apparent attempt to satisfy the requirements thereof, passed the following resolution: “Mr. Rhine moved, seconded by Mr. Hubler, to approve the sale of the Fourth Ward property (zoned as residential, unused by the district, and a clear title) as per the same specifications for advertisement as the Covington Township property. A roll call vote indicated all members voting ‘yes’ and the motion carried unanimously.”

This resolution fails to meet the statutory requirements, in that the terms and conditions of the sale are not fixed therein and it omits any instruction as to whether the sale shall be by sealed bid, the *463time limitations as to when the bids may be received, the manner of payment, the amount of down payment required, terms for closing, etc. In view of this and in light of judicial interpretation of the wording of this section as being mandatory and requiring that the terms and conditions be included in the initial resolution, this court agrees with the opinion in Rumpf v. Pine Grove Area School District, 68 Schuyl. 152 (1972), and enters the following

ORDER

Now, October 16, 1979, following hearing into the above-captioned proceedings for declaratory judgment, it is the order of this court that the sale of the Fourth Ward School property by the Clearfield Area School District be and is hereby declared void, all bids rejected, and the matter referred back to said school district with the direction that should said school district still desire to dispose of said property by sale, the provisions of the statute set forth above shall be followed.