alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                            99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of The Judge Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert G. Alessandrini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial position and results of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Robert G. Alessandrini
---------------------------
Robert G. Alessandrini
Chief Financial Officer
March 7, 2003
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-16-00344-CR

_________________

IN RE RAYMOND YOUNG

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 92153

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Raymond Young filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which he 

asked this Court to compel the trial judge to rule upon his post-conviction motion 

for forensic DNA testing. We requested a response from the State, and the State 

filed an appendix containing the trial court’s appealable order, dated October 31, 

2016, denying Young’s motion. On November 9, 2016, Young filed a notice of 

appeal, which stated that he was appealing the trial court’s order denying his 

motion, and we docketed that proceeding as No. 09-16-00432-CR, Raymond 

Young v. The State of Texas.
2

We conclude that because the trial court has now ruled upon Young’s postconviction motion for DNA testing, this original proceeding is moot. Accordingly, 

we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on October 14, 2016

Opinion Delivered December 7, 2016

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
April 2 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KHALEEM HASAN GUILLO RY , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00138

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decisio n be certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of Moventis Capital, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006, Blake Ponuick, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |                                      
|------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                    |                                      
|Dated: May 16, 2007 | /s/ BLAKE PONUICK                    
|                    | Blake Ponuick,                       
|                    | Chief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
      LaserLock Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Normal A. Gardner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complied with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





November
      14, 2007


/s/ Norman
                GardnerNorman
                GardnerChief
                  Executive Officer
                Chief
                  Financial Officer




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by the Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.





Explanatory
      Note: The same individual serves as chief executive (principal) officer and
      principal financial officer. Accordingly, there are no other individuals who
      are
“other certifying officers” referred to in this certification.
REGIONAL AIRPORT 

December 5, 2014 

Kevin D. Schlemmer 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, 81

h Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Reference DOT -OST -2006-23932 

Dear Kevin, 

UO~ S .. \lain SlrPet 

,Joplin. l\10 (i/IHO 1 

IJ 7 -U2:)-0~G2 

Fax 417-G2t'i-d7Jil 

-. ,J•:::,mail: ~c;tockmn(iljoplinmo.org _)• ~ -~"~ 

The City of Joplin, Missouri is pleased to provide in this letter its comments on the pending Essential Air 

Service RFP regarding our local air service. 

The last two years have again been exceptional for Joplin air service. Since American Eagle replaced Great 

Lakes as our local airline in February of 2011 we have seen a great resurgence in the local commercial traffic. 

We have always know that the traffic was there but the market was not being properly served. American 

service has been a great first step in filling that need. 

We are very pleased with American Eagle service and are working with them to improve and expand that 

service. We are gratified that Eagle is proposing for this bid cycle a subsidy of $519,201 per year. 

Based on the numbers Joplin is well on its way to attaining its goal of supporting subsidy free air service. We 

appreciate the efforts the Department has made to support us as the air service landscape around us changed 

during the past decade. We wholeheartedly endorse the proposal of American Airlines to provide American 

Eagle service at Joplin for the next two year EAS cycle. 

We accept American's provision that 50-seat regional jet equipment types may vary and that either American 

Eagle or US Airways Express (operating as American Eagle) may operate Joplin's AA coded flights. We do 

hope the carrier will ensure we receive as many 50-seat flights as possible in order to accommodate our 

growing traffic demand. We do note that the carrier's bid document specifies the 50-seat ERJ-145, CRJ-200, or 

44-seat ERJ-140 regional jets. 

As was the case for the last two year EAS cycle with American, Joplin waives the right to hold-in American 

Eagle (after 120 day notice of termination) should the carrier wish to exit the market. We are confident that will 

not occur and look forward to a continued long and successful relationship with American. 

Best regards, 

Steve Stockam 

Airport Manager 

-
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 61134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25454]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7622]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
the Democratic Republic of the Congo

    Pursuant to Section 7086(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. 
L. 111-117), as carried forward by the Full-Year Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10), (``the Act''), and 
Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby 
determine that it is important to the national interest of the United 
States to waive the requirements of Section 7086(c)(1) of the Act with 
respect to the Democratic Republic of the Congo and I hereby waive such 
restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 11, 2011.
Thomas Nides,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-25454 Filed 9-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
# C_2016107EN.01000201.xml

| 22.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 March 2016

(2016/C 107/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1271 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4544 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78303 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2538 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0916 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4428 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,035 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,49 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2581 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4688 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2325 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4819 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4703 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7408 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6645 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5324 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 308,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2448 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3028 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5215 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 874,81 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5728 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,296 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,7226 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,370 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0897 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5916 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,9933 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1271

JPY

Japanese yen

125,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4544

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78303

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2538

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0916

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4428

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,035

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,49

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2581

RON

Romanian leu

4,4688

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2325

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4819

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4703

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7408

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6645

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5324

KRW

South Korean won

1 308,05

ZAR

South African rand

17,2448

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3028

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5215

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 874,81

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5728

PHP

Philippine peso

52,296

RUB

Russian rouble

76,7226

THB

Thai baht

39,370

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0897

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5916

INR

Indian rupee

74,9933

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7885

KENNETH E. JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

C. JOHNSON, Nurse,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

S. K. YOUNG, Warden of Operations; A. P.

HARVEY, Assistant Warden of Operations, 

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-02-1205-7)

Submitted: April 12, 2004 Decided: April 29, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth E. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr.,

Elizabeth Kay Dillon, GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, P.C., Roanoke,

Virginia, for Appellee.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth E. Jackson appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendant Carolyn Johnson and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging deliberate

indifference to his medical needs. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Jackson v. Johnson, No.

CA-02-1205-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2839 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2839

To provide an additional $1,000,000,000 for the Government of Israel to 
  procure the Iron Dome defense system to counter short-range rocket 
                    threats, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2021

   Mr. Cruz introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide an additional $1,000,000,000 for the Government of Israel to 
  procure the Iron Dome defense system to counter short-range rocket 
                    threats, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL AMOUNT FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL 
              TO PROCURE THE IRON DOME DEFENSE SYSTEM TO COUNTER SHORT-
              RANGE ROCKET THREATS.

    (a) Appropriation.--There is appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fiscal year 2022, for 
``Procurement-Procurement, Defense-wide'', $1,000,000,000, to remain 
available until September 30, 2024.
    (b) Availability.--
            (1) In general.--Of the amount appropriated by subsection 
        (a), $1,000,000,000 shall be available for the Secretary of 
        Defense to provide to the Government of Israel for the 
        procurement of the Iron Dome defense system to counter short-
        range rocket threats.
            (2) Conditions.--
                    (A) Emergency requirements in support of operation 
                guardian of the walls.--Amounts available pursuant to 
                paragraph (1) shall be provided to address emergent 
                requirements in support of Operation Guardian of the 
                Walls.
                    (B) Exchange of letters and agreement.--Amounts 
                available under paragraph (1) shall be transferred 
                pursuant to an exchange of letters and are in addition 
                to funds provided pursuant to the U.S.-Israel Iron Dome 
                Procurement Agreement, as amended.
                    (C) Rule of construction.--That nothing in this 
                paragraph shall be construed to apply to amounts made 
                available in prior appropriations Acts for the 
                procurement of the Iron Dome defense system.
    (c) Supplement, Not Supplant.--The amount appropriated by 
subsection (a) shall supplement and not supplant any amounts already 
appropriated for the purpose described in subsection (b)(1).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANYPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2003 and filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert E. Sulentic,Chief Executive Officer of Trammell Crow Company (the “Company”), herebycertify that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   | /s/ Robert E. Sulentic    |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Name: Robert E. Sulentic  |
|   | Date: March 15, 2004 |

 

 

----
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Keystone Sanitary Landfill, Inc. :

and Solid Waste Services, Inc. :

d/b/a J.P. Mascaro & Sons, :

Appellants :

:

v. : No. 262 C.D. 2016

:

Monroe County Municipal Waste :

Management Authority :

O R D E R

NOW, December 5, 2016, having considered appellants’ application for 

reargument and appellee’s answer in response thereto, the application is denied.

 

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
DECEMBER CROP PRODUCTION

Executive Summary

DECEMBER 10, 2013 12:00 PM

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service
USDA-NASS 

12-10-13

Contents

Field Crops Fruits/Nuts Specialty Crops

Cotton Citrus Dry Beans

Sugarcane Coffee
USDA-NASS 

12-10-13

December 2013 Crop Production

Crop Unit

December

2013

% Change

from 

Previous

Forecast

% Change

from 

Previous

Season

Oranges Mil Tons 7.78 -2.3 -6.8

Grapefruit Mil Tons 1.08 -4.2 -9.0

Tangelos Thou Tons 45.0 NC NC

Tangerines and 

 Mandarins Thou Tons 719 -1.0 +5.1
12.9

9.3

9.0

7.6

10.1

9.1

8.2

8.9 9.0

8.3

7.8

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

U.S. Orange Production

USDA-NASS

12-10-13

Million Tons
USDA-NASS 

12-10-13

Crop Unit

December

2013

% Change 

from 

Previous 

Forecast

% Change 

from 

Previous 

Season

All Cotton

 Harvested Mil Ac 7.78 NC -17.0

 Yield Lbs/Ac 806 -0.2 -9.1

 Production Mil Bales 13.1 -0.3 -24.5

December 2013 Crop Production
USDA-NASS 

12-10-13

18.3

23.3

23.9

21.6

19.2

12.8

12.2

18.1

15.6

17.3

13.1

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

24.0

26.0

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U.S. All Cotton Production

Million bales
USDA-NASS 

12-10-13

806

400

500

600

700

800

900

Pounds/acre

U.S. All Cotton Yield
USDA-NASS 

12-10-13

Upland Cotton Yield, December 1, 2013

Pounds and Change From Previous Forecast

767 -53

1616# 141 1232# 112

1461 -156

780 -98

845 -54

68355

1267# -39

1188# 98

976 -70

1059 -141

85663 565 NC 72157

U.S. 788

-2

# Record High

878 NC

596 NC

972 -25
USDA-NASS 

12-10-13

Crop Unit

December

2013

% Change 

from 

Previous 

Forecast

% Change 

from 

Previous 

Season

Dry Beans Mil Cwt 24.1 -2.2 -24.6

Coffee (HI) Mil Lbs 7.00 N/A NC

Sugarcane Mil Tons 32.2 +0.4 -0.1

December 2013 Crop Production
USDA-NASS 

12-10-13

Upcoming Reports 

Dec 27 Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

Dec 30 Agricultural Prices

Jan 10 Crop Production

Crop Production – Annual

Grain Stocks

Rice Stocks

Cotton Ginnings

Winter Wheat Seedings

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service
USDA-NASS 

12-10-13

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

202-720-2127

800-727-9540

nass@nass.usda.gov
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Forgotten  Investments
Company,  Inc.,  on Form 10- QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  Daniel L.  Hodges,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form, Revision 2.4 Page 1 of 1

8/22/08

AD Title: Elimination of Fan Shields From Tri-Jet Airplanes 

Docket No. FAA-2006-24171 Directorate Identifier: 2006-NE-08-AD

Costs:

Costs per Product (e.g., engine, propeller)

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

WorkhoursLabor cost 

(@$80/hour)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Install Fan Shields 2.5 $ 200.00 $9,451 $9,651.00 40 $386,040

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $386,040

Costs covered under warranty

Special considerations for Economic Analysis:

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES explain below NO 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES explain below NO 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES explain below NO 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES explain below NO 

Explanation: