alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
My name is Heather Langeland, and I fully support the EPA's proposed 

standard. It should be implemented promptly and without changes that 

water it down in any way. 

Setting limits on the carbon pollution causing climate change will spur 

investment and innovation in clean energy technologies to modernize and 

clean up power plants. New clean energy technologies that produce less 

carbon pollution will create a new generation of clean energy jobs. Since 

1970, every dollar invested in compliance with Clean Air Act standards has 

yielded four to eight dollars in economic benefits. 

Each time an extreme weather event hits a community around the country, 

the economic impact can be devastating. From 2011-2013 alone, damages 

from extreme weather events have exceeded $200 billion. While extreme 

weather events cost communities millions, inaction on climate change 

raises costs related to health care and hurts productivity through school 

and work days lost to hurricanes, blizzards, extreme heat and dirty air. 

The good news is that Americans are ready for their leaders and 

government to take action. A February 2014 Sierra Club poll found that 

seven out of ten Americans favor setting limits on carbon pollution from 

power plants, and more than half believe these safeguards already exist. 

The poll also found that 66 percent believe climate change is a serious 

problem and want the government to address it. Further, Americans are 

willing to put their money where their mouth is. A poll conducted by 

researchers from Harvard and Yale found that the average American is 

willing to pay $162 a year for cleaner energy. 

We have an obligation to our children and future generations to address 

the primary cause of climate change: the unlimited dumping of carbon 

pollution into our air by power plants. The proposed carbon pollution 

standard will help protect us from the health risks and other impacts of 

climate change. Please adopt the standard. 

~ . I 

Thank you. \ rec-~er l_w, <f=LC.S1 C 

F-1 ·-~ \ lth S"\ . ~ J. 

p, -tt.:.\) 01~\\ rA \':'S ;).03 

h-Lc..n'i<::..LG.'lc.\(f;:. \iGt\Y'Ic,, \. CC1ll
---

EXHIBIT 32.1(a)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce A. Williamson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: August 10, 2009
By:
/s/ BRUCE A. WILLIAMSONBruce A. Williamson
President and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 7, 2016

t1130

Order 

Clerk

December 7, 2016

153752

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153752

COA: 323646 

Kent CC: 14-000116-FC

TORY JEHON OVERSTREET,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2938 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2938

To designate the United States Courthouse and Federal Building located 
  at 111 North Adams Street in Tallahassee, Florida, as the ``Joseph 
 Woodrow Hatchett United States Courthouse and Federal Building'', and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 5, 2021

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States Courthouse and Federal Building located 
  at 111 North Adams Street in Tallahassee, Florida, as the ``Joseph 
 Woodrow Hatchett United States Courthouse and Federal Building'', and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSEPH WOODROW HATCHETT UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE AND FEDERAL 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Courthouse and Federal Building 
located at 111 North Adams Street in Tallahassee, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Joseph Woodrow Hatchett United States 
Courthouse and Federal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States 
Courthouse and Federal Building referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph Woodrow Hatchett United States 
Courthouse and Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P AU L I NO AL Z AT E NA VA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73967 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 598- 528 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 6, 2012 ** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , R E IN H A R D T , an dT A S H IM A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P aul i no A l z a t e N ava , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 32 1 F . 3d 88 9, 89 4 (9th C i r.



# FI LED MA R 15 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 73967 2 2 0 0 3 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g A lz a te N av a ’s m o tio n to r e ope n w he r e he f

i l e d the m ot i on s e ve n y e ar s a f t e rthe B I A i s s ue d i t s f

i na l or de rof r e m o v a l, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and fai l ed t o d em on strat e the du e di l i gence r e qu ir e dto o b ta in e qu itab le to llin g o f th e f ilin g d e a d lin e , s e e I

tu rr ib a rr ia , 321 F . 3d a t897. I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e do nota ddr e s s A l z a t e N ava ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i on. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
NUMBER 13

- 1 5

- 00 081

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JUAN GABRIEL ESPRONC EDA

, Appellant,

v.

SYLVIA SUE HANDY ESP RONCEDA

, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Hidalgo County, Texas



### ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Garza, Benavides , and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the appellant ’ s unopposed motion to abate the

appeal to allow the parties the opportunity to engage in informal mediation

. The Court,

having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the unopposed motion2

to abate, is of the opinion that the motion to abate the appeal should be granted. The

motion to abate the appeal i s GRANTED and this appeal is ordered ABATED until May

18, 2015

.

The Court directs appellant to file, on or before May 18, 2015

, either (1) a motion

to reinstate the appeal, or (2) a motion t o dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

2nd day of April , 201 5

.
Exhibit 4.20

 

Power of Attorney

 

I, Yingfeng Zhang, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China (ID Card No.: ##################, holding 98% of the equity interest in Ku6 (Beijing) Information Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) (“My Equity Interest”), hereby, with respect to My Equity Interest, irrevocably authorize WeiMoSanYi (Tianjin) Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Authorized Person”) to exercise the following rights within the period of validity of this Power of Attorney:

 

The Authorized Person is authorized to act as my sole and exclusive proxy to exercise in my name all my rights with respect to My Equity Interest in accordance with the PRC laws and the articles of association of the Company, including but not limited to: (1) proposing to convene and attending the shareholders’ meeting of the Company and sign all relevant shareholder resolutions in my name; (2) exercising all my rights as a shareholder as set forth in laws and the constitutional documents of the Company; and (3) acting as my authorized representative to nominate and appoint the legal representative, director, supervisor, general manager and other senior officers of the Company.

 

I hereby acknowledge and accept any action, omission and decision in respect of My Equity Interest that may be made by the Authorized Person within the scope of his authorization during the period of validity of this Power of Attorney. Furthermore, I hereby confirm that the said action, omission and decision are binding upon me, and I will not object such action, omission and decision in any way, and I will bear any legal consequence arising out of such action, omission and decision.

 

If it is necessary for me to enter into any documents for the implementation, execution or performance of the said action or decision for any reason, I will execute such documents at the request of the Authorized Person.

 

The Authorized Person may, with respect to the matters set forth above and the exercise of rights in relation to My Equity Interest, empower any other individual or entity to act, without notifying me or obtaining my consent.

 

So long as I am a shareholder of the Company, this Power of Attorney is irrevocable and continually valid, commencing on the date of execution of this Power of Attorney.

 

 

	
Principal: 
    	
Yingfeng Zhang
    	
 
    
	
Signature: 
    	
/s/ Yingfeng Zhang
    	
 
    
	
Date: August 1, 2012
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 297 

AN ACT 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government 

to regulate the labeling of products made in the United 

States and introduced in interstate or foreign commerce, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 297 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reinforcing American3 Made Products Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVITY OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY TO REGU5 LATE LABELING OF PRODUCTS MADE IN THE 

6 UNITED STATES AND INTRODUCED IN INTER7 STATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE. 

8 Section 320933 of the Violent Crime Control and 

9 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 45a) is amend10 ed— 

11 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘To the ex12 tent’’ and inserting the following: 

13 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—To the extent’’; 

14 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(b) EFFECT ON STATE LAW.— 

16 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para17 graph (2), the provisions of this section shall super18 sede any provisions of the law of any State expressly 

19 relating to the extent to which a product is intro20 duced, delivered for introduction, sold, advertised, or 

21 offered for sale in interstate or foreign commerce 

22 with a ‘Made in the U.S.A.’ or ‘Made in America’ 

23 label, or the equivalent thereof, in order to represent 

24 that such product was in whole or substantial part 

25 of domestic origin. 
3 

†S 297 ES

1 ‘‘(2) ENFORCEMENT.—Nothing in this section 

2 shall preclude the application of the law of any State 

3 to the use of a label not in compliance with sub4 section (a).’’; and 

5 (3) in the third sentence of subsection (a), as 

6 so designated by paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Noth7 ing in this section’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as pro8 vided in subsection (b), nothing in this section’’. 

Passed the Senate September 14, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 297 

AN ACT 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal 

purposes. interstate or foreign commerce, and for other made in the United States and introduced in Government to regulate the labeling of products
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 9, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00714

- CV

ESTATE OF JOANNE COOKSEY FRIEND, DECEASED,

From the County Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6904

- 16

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant’s Unopposed Second Motion for Exte nsion Time to File Re ply Brief is

hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to July 10, 2019.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of July, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
12:00 P.M.

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

March Crop Production

Executive Summary

Jorge Garcia-Pratts, Head

Fruits, Vegetables, and Specialty Crops Section

Crops Branch

March 8, 2018
USDA-NASS

3-8-18

Field Crops Fruit & Nuts Specialty Crops

Sugarcane Citrus

Contents
USDA-NASS

3-8-18

Objective Measurement Row Count

Survey Type Field Measurement Field Observation

Crops Included Oranges, Grapefruit, 

Tangerines

Oranges, Grapefruit, 

Tangerines

Sample Size 947 Groves 89,348 Rows

Collection Period February 16-23 February 26-27

Survey Overview

Florida Citrus
USDA-NASS

3-8-18

March 2018 Crop Production

% Change % Change

From From

Crop Unit March Previous Previous

2018 Forecast Season 

Production

Oranges Mil Tons 3.88 -1.5 -24.8

Grapefruit Thou Tons 530 NC -22.3

Tangerines & 

Mandarins Thou Tons 882 +0.1 -14.6
13.7

9.82

13.0

12.2 12.4

11.5

12.9

9.25 9.02

7.63

10.1

9.13

8.24

8.91 8.98

8.27

6.77

6.35 6.09

5.16

3.88

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

Million Tons

Orange Production

United States

USDA-NASS

3-8-18
USDA-NASS

3-8-18

March 2018 Crop Production

% Change % Change

From From

Crop Unit March Previous Previous

2018 Forecast Season 

Production 

Sugarcane Mil Tons 33.2 +4.1 +3.5
USDA-NASS

3-8-18

Release Date Report Title

March 9 Price Reactions after USDA Crop Reports

March 23 Cattle on Feed

March 28 Agricultural Prices

March 29

Prospective Plantings

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

Grain Stocks 

Rice Stocks

April 2 CAIR: Grain Crushings, Fats & Oils, and Cotton System

Crop Progress

April 10 Crop Production

Upcoming Reports
USDA NASS Data Users’ 

Meeting

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

University of Chicago – Gleacher Center 

450 North Cityfront Plaza Drive 

Chicago, Illinois 60611 

312-464-8787

USDA-NASS

3-8-18
USDA-NASS

3-8-18
United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

202-720-2127

800-727-9540

nass@nass.usda.gov
#### Commonwealth v. Lyle

*John J. Kennedy, Jr., Assistant Attorney General,*for Commonwealth.

*Joseph E. Ahornare,*for defendant.

December 29, 1977

WOLFE, *P.J.,*

This is an appeal from suspension of the motor vehicle operating privileges of Mr. Lyle by the Department of Transportation for a period of one year following his conviction of operating while under the influence.

Appellant was arrested December 1, 1976, and convicted April 29, 1977.

Defendant does not question his conviction but argues the period of suspension is improper and should be six months as calculated under The Vehicle Code of June 17, 1976, 75 Pa.C.S.A. §1532, effective July 1, 1977.

*798Appellant appears to argue that by reason of the hiatus time period between the approved date and the effective date of Act 81 and during which time the hiatus existed the violation occurred, the penalty was changed from a non-graded criminal offense to a graded criminal offense under Act 81, to wit, a misdemeanor of the third degree, the latter time suspension should therefore prevail.1

Although we possibly have misinterpreted defendant’s argument, he appears to say that, notwithstanding the arrest and conviction having occurred prior to the effective date of Act 81, the act should apply by reason of the conduct now being a misdemeanor of the third degree rather than a misdemeanor as provided under The Vehicle Code of April 29, 1959, P.L. 58, as amended.

We do not view this argument in a cavil manner; however, we find no merit to it; it is a non sequitur.

Appellant may not reap the benefits of an act not effective at the time of his arrest or conviction. The Commonwealth is prohibited from applying its mandates ex post facto and its citizenry may not compel it to grant relief prematurely.

For the foregoing reasons we enter the following

ORDER

And now, December 29, 1977, the appeal is dismissed and the order of the secretary is affirmed suspending the operating privileges of appellant for a period of one year commencing April 29, 1977.

1

. Section 1532(b) of Act 81 mandates a suspension of six months of operating privileges of any driver if convicted of violation of section 3731, driving under influence of alcohol or controlled substance.

Section 3731(d) classifies driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance as a misdemeanor of the third degree.
OMB Control No. 2060-0347

Take the ENERGY STAR Challenge!

“I take the ENERGY STAR Challenge and will help improve the energy efficiency of America’s commercial 

and industrial buildings by 10% or more.”
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 minute per response. Send comments on the 

Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing 

respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control 

number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.

EPA Form 5900-196

Products | Home Improvement | New Homes | Buildings & Plants | Partner Resources | Kids

Publications | News Room | FAQs | Contact Us | Privacy | Site Index | Recursos en Español

PDF Viewer | Excel Viewer

EPA Home

EPA Search

DOE Home

DOE Search
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 62 (Wednesday, April 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (15-024)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for 
licensing.

DATES: April 1, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James J. McGroary, Patent Counsel, 
Marshall Space Flight Center, Mail Code LS01, Huntsville, AL 35812; 
telephone (256) 544-0013; fax (256) 544-0258.

NASA Case No.: MFS-33161-1: Method of System for Predicting Rocket 
Nozzle Deformation During Engine Start-Up and Shut-Down Transients;
NASA Case No.: MFS-32931-1: Reconfigurable Sensor Monitoring System.

Sumara M. Thompson-King,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-07458 Filed 3-31-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      23,155,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,566,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (82,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,721,000
<PP&E>                                     234,439,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,907,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             293,358,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,277,000
<BONDS>                                    114,742,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      100,737,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,270,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               293,358,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           234,526,000
<CGS>                                      184,841,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,901,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             214,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,430,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                  (3,857,000)
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,287,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.40)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.40)
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes Of This Exhibit, Primary Means Basic
</FN>
        

</TABLE>