alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.21



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Brian M. Beattie, the chief financial officer of SupportSoft, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



|(i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 8, 2005



/s/ BRIAN M. BEATTIEBrian M. BeattieExecutive Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to SupportSoft, Inc. and will be retained by SupportSoft, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

|1 | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed filed with the SEC and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 62 (Wednesday, April 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07455]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (15-021)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for 
licensing.

DATES: April 1, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark W. Homer, Patent Counsel, NASA 
Management Office--JPL, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Mail Stop 180-200, 
Pasadena, CA 91109; telephone (818) 354-7770.

NASA Case No.: NPO-49116-1-CU: Heliostat with Stowing and Wind Survival 
Capabilities;
NPO-49439-1: Deep Space Positioning System;
DRC-009-008DIV: Improved Digital Map Rending Method;
DRC-013-019: System and Method for Monitoring the Deflection and Slope 
of a Three-Dimensional Structure such as a Wing using Strain 
Measurements at Discrete Locations;
NASA Case No.: DRC-013-020: Wavelet-Based Processing for Fiber Optic 
Sensing Systems;
DRC-014-003: Highly Elastic Strain Gage for Low Modulus Materials;
DRC-012-033: Improved Ground Collision Avoidance System (iGCAS).

Sumara M. Thompson-King,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-07455 Filed 3-31-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Jerome R Mahoney,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                           Date: May 12, 2005

                                           By /s/ Jerome R Mahoney
                                              ----------------------
                                              Jerome R Mahoney
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Principal Financial Officer
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0518. ALI S. MUHAMMAD v. PROGRESSIVE PREMIER

INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS.

Ali Muhammad, represented by counsel, filed this action for damages against

Progressive Premier Insurance Company of Illinois (“Progressive”) and Brett Bradley.

The trial court later granted Progressive’s motion to dismiss Muhammad’s claims

against it. Muhammad, proceeding pro se, then filed this direct appeal. We lack

jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, the record contains no indication that Muhammad’s counsel has

withdrawn from representing him in this case. Consequently, Muhammad’s pro se

notice of appeal is a nullity because, based on the current record, he currently is

represented by counsel in this action and thus may not attempt to represent himself.

See Tolbert v. Toole, 296 Ga. 357, 361-363 (3) (767 SE2d 24) (2014); Jacobsen v.

Haldi, 210 Ga. App. 817, 818-819 (1) (437 SE2d 819) (1993).

Second, because Muhammad’s claims against Bradley remain pending below,

Muhammad was required to use the interlocutory appeal procedures – including

obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court – to appeal the order

granting Progressive’s motion to dismiss. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191

Ga. App. 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction

over this appeal. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996).

For the above reasons, Muhammad’s appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

November 23, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/23/2016
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**Certificate
      of Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      1350)**





The
      undersigned, Michael A. Grollman, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief
      Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of National Scientific
      Corporation (the “Company”), has executed this certification in connection with
      the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 (the
“Report”). The undersigned hereby certifies that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial results of operations of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certificate as of the January
      16, 2007.








/s/
                Michael A. GrollmanMichael
                A. Grollman
              Chairman,
                Chief Executive Officer,
              and
                Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of In Full Affect,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Daniel
L. Hodges,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


October 15, 2021


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2092


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2092 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined the Registration
Statement File No. 333-257953 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
? #

# 8

6  ̇.

æ

Allegro q. = 120

f

 ̇.

æ

œ œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m. 100, 2nd beat

fi

J

œ

^

‰ ‰

œ.

p

œ ‰ Œ. 5Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ.

? #

# Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ.

æ œ

‰ Œ. 13Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ.

? #

# Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. 2

Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. 21Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ.

? #

# œ ‰ Œ. 3 2 29

œ. œ. œ. Œ. ! Œ. œ.

>

 ̇.

æ

? #

# J

œ ‰ ‰

œ.æ œ ‰ Œ. 37

Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ.

? #

# Œ. œ.

æ œ

‰ Œ. 45Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. 2Œ. œ.æ

? #

# œ ‰ Œ. 53

Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. 3 2 61

œ. œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Words & Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

40th Army Band, VTARNG

Timpani

The Official March of the National Guard Bureau -Full Orchestra VersionDedicated to the Men and Women, Soldiers and Airmen of America's National Guard
? #

# œ. Œ. ! Œ. œ.

>

 ̇.

æ J

œ ‰ ‰

œ.

>

æ

F

œ ‰ Œ. 69Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ.

? #

# Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ.

æ œ

‰ Œ. 77Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ.

? #

# Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. 2

Œ. œ.æ œ ‰ Œ. 85Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ.

? #

# œ ‰ Œ. 3 93 2

œ. œ. œ. Œ. ! Œ. œ.

>

 ̇.

æ

? #

#

fi

J

œ ‰ ‰

œ.

>

æ

F

Ceremonial version,

from m. 4

œ ‰ Œ.

101

Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ.

? #

# Œ. œ.

>

æ œ

>

‰Œ.

109

Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. Œ. œ. œ ‰ Œ. 2Œ. œ.

>

æ

? #

# œ

>

‰Œ.

117

Œ. œ. œ ‰Œ. Œ. œ. œ ‰Œ. 3 2

125

œ.

>

œ.

>

? #

# œ.

>

Œ. ! Œ. œ.

>

 ̇.

æ

sfp

 ̇.

æ

 ̇.

æ J

œ ‰ ‰ Œ.

ƒ

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Official March of the National Guard Bureau

-Timpani2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

DATE: November 10, 2010

SUBJECT: Technical Support Document for Virginia’s Adoption of the 8-hour Ozone 

Standard, Related Reference Conditions, and Update of Appendices 

/s/

FROM: Irene Shandruk, Physical Scientist 

Office of Air Program Planning 

TO: File

/s/

THRU: Brian Rehn, Acting Associate Director 

Office of Air Program Planning

A. BACKGROUND 

This technical support document (TSD) evaluates the September 27, 2010 submittal of 

the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision pertaining to the ambient air 

quality standard for ozone and related reference conditions.

The Clean Air Act (CAA) specifies that EPA must reevaluate the appropriateness of its 

various air quality standards every five years. As part of the process, EPA reviewed the 

latest health-based research and determined that a revised standard for ozone was

necessary to protect public health. EPA revised the level of the 8-hour standard to a level 

of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) to provide increased protection for children and other 

‘‘at risk’’ populations against an array of ozone-related adverse health effects that range 

from decreased lung function and increased respiratory symptoms to serious indicators of 

respiratory morbidity including emergency department visits and hospital admissions for 

respiratory causes, and possibly cardiovascular-related morbidity as well as total nonaccidental and cardiorespiratory mortality. Based on this information, EPA promulgated 

a more stringent national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone on March 27, 

2008 (73 FR 16436).

B. STATE SUBMITTAL

On September 27, 2010, the Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a formal revision to 

its SIP. The SIP revision consists of an amendment which includes the revised ambient 

air quality standard for ozone, and related reference conditions. Virginia=s revision 

incorporates the Federal 8-hour ozone standard into the Code of Virginia (9VAC5 
Chapter 30). In addition, the list of appendices to 40 CFR Part 51 was updated under 

documents incorporated by reference (9VAC5-20-21).

The following are the specific provisions that are being modified or added:

 9VAC5-20-21: Documents incorporated by reference (modified)

The list of appendices were updated.

 9VAC5-30-55: Ozone (8-hour, 0.08 ppm) (modified)

The level of 0.08 ppm was added to the regulation.

 9VAC5-30-56: Ozone (8-hour, 0.075 ppm) (added)

A new section was added for the revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.075 ppm.

C. EPA EVALUATION

Virginia’s SIP revisions for the ambient air quality standard for ozone is consistent with 

the 8-hour Federal ozone standard.

D. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED AGENCY ACTION

EPA approval of the SIP revision is recommended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF VYYO INC. FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      170
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,976
<PP&E>                                             930
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,335
<COMMON>                                         2,649
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,267)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,906
<SALES>                                          1,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,966
<CGS>                                            2,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (393)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,089)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.97)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00408-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.T., A 

CHILD

----------

FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 323-102895-16

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant T.T. (Mother) attempts to appeal from the trial court’s 

interlocutory order terminating her parental rights to D.T. We dismiss the appeal.

Appellee the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) sought 

to terminate the parental rights of Mother and D.I. (Father) to their children, Do. 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

I., A.I., L.I., and D.T. On March 1, 2016, the trial court severed the cause of 

action regarding D.T. from the other children “to proceed as such to final 

judgment in this Court.” On October 17, 2016, the trial court signed an 

“Interlocutory Order of Termination,” which terminated Mother’s rights to D.T. 

The order did not address Father’s parental rights to D.T. Mother filed a notice of 

appeal from this interlocutory order on October 27, 2016. Accordingly, on 

November 1, 2016, we notified the parties of our concern that we may not have

jurisdiction over Mother’s appeal because the order “does not appear to be a final 

judgment or an appealable interlocutory order” and requested a response no 

later than November 14, 2016, from any party desiring to continue Mother’s 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, 44.3. No party responded. 

We have jurisdiction to consider appeals from final judgments or from 

interlocutory orders where a statute explicitly provides appellate jurisdiction. 

See Jack B. Anglin Co. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. 

proceeding). The order Mother attempts to appeal from is neither. See, e.g., In 

re M.H., No. 08-15-00091-CV, 2015 WL 3646655, at *1 (Tex. App.—El Paso 

June 12, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re F.M.-T., No. 02-12-00522-CV, 2013 WL 

1337789, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr. 4, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, 43.2(f).
3

/s/ Lee Gabriel

LEE GABRIEL

JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 1, 2016
{"id":650052,"date":"2024-04-18T23:35:39","date_gmt":"2024-04-19T03:35:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/?post_type=topic&p=650052"},"modified":"2024-04-18T23:35:40","modified_gmt":"2024-04-19T03:35:40","slug":"facilities","status":"publish","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/langley\/facilities\/","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":true},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":true},"author":508,"featured_media":0,"parent":165921,"menu_order":0,"template":"","meta":{"nasa_hds_core_meta_l10n":"en-US","nasa_hds_core_meta_article_editor":"","nasa_hds_core_meta_article_contacts":[],"nasa_hds_core_meta_article_topic":"","nasa_hds_core_meta_linked_locations":[],"nasa_hds_core_meta_article_related_articles":[],"hds_migrate_meta_pr_release_id":"","hds_migrate_meta_pr_release_type":"","nasa_hds_core_meta_location_x":"","nasa_hds_core_meta_location_y":"","nasa_hds_core_meta_gallery_images":[]},"categories":[2863],"news-tags":[],"internal-terms":[],"coauthors":[12865],"parsely":{"version":"1.1.0","meta":[],"rendered":"","tracker_url":"https:\/\/cdn.parsely.com\/keys\/nasa.gov\/p.js"},"read_time":1,"time_ago":"2 months","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic\/650052"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/508"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic\/650052\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":650367,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic\/650052\/revisions\/650367"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic\/165921"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=650052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=650052"},{"taxonomy":"news-tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news-tags?post=650052"},{"taxonomy":"internal-terms","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/internal-terms?post=650052"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=650052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

C.W. Gilluly, Chief Financial Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the "Company")
certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB/A for year ended June 30, 2005 and
that to the best of his or her knowledge:

     1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.


March 22, 2007                          /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                        Principal Finance Officer
                                        (Chief Financial Officer)