alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
output_FacilityList

FacilityID met_file rural_urban nad max_dist model_distradials circles overlap_dist acute hrs elev ratio 01017NEI8623 3000 30Y Y 10 04015NEI2AZT18199 3000 30Y Y 10 04021NEIAZT$12365 3000 30Y Y 10

Page 1
Exhibit
32.01




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sangui Biotech International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Thomas Striepe, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Joachim Fleing, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Dated: October 15,
2008  /s/ Thomas Striepe


__________________________________________


By:
Thomas Striepe


Chief
Executive Officer






Dated: October 15,
2008  /s/ Joachim Fleing
 __________________________________________
 By:
Joachim Fleing
 Chief
Financial Officer








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Order 2014

- 4

- 31

Served: April 29, 2014



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 29 th d ay of April , 201 4

Joint Application of

AIR TAHITI NUI; SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE;

DELTA AIR LINES, INC .;

KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAA RT

MAATSCHAPPIJ N.V.; and

ALITALIA

- COMPAGNIA AEREA

ITALIANA S.P.A.

for Approval of and Antitrust Immunity for Alliance

Agreements under 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308 and 41309 Docket DOT

- OST

- 20 13

- 0 077

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION

In this proceeding, Air Tahiti Nui (“ Air Tahiti Nui”)

, Société Air France (“Air France”), Delta

Air Lines, Inc. (“ Delta”), Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (“ KLM”), and Alitalia

Compagnia Aerea Italiana S.p.A. (“ Alitalia”) (together, the “Joint Applicants”) sought a grant of

antitrust immunity to operate a transatlantic immunized alliance. By Order 2014

- 3

- 17, issued o n

March 28, 2014, we tentatively concluded that approval of the Joint Applicants’ request for

antitrust immunity was not required by the public interest. The Joint Applicants filed a timely

response to Order 2014

- 3

- 17

, moving to dismiss their application without prejudice.

In light of the above, the Department dismisses, without prejudice, the application filed by the

Joint Applicants in Docket DOT

- OST

- 2013

- 0077.

ACCORDINGLY :

1. We grant the April 18, 2014, Joint Motion of the Applicants to Dismiss, submitted by Air

Tahiti Nui, Société Air France, Delta Air Lines, Inc., Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V.,

and Alitalia Compagnia Aerea Italiana S.p.A. in this docket;2 2

. We will serve this order on all parties on the service list in this docket.

By :

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary for Aviation

and International Affairs

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Holli C. Nichols, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ HOLLI C. NICHOLS                                                 
|                        |  |     |  | Holli C. Nichols Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0528 Standard Review Draft 1/5/2012 ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ AHfile:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM] SAT (concerns) (08/02/2011): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: PMN: Health 1-2, Eco 3. Health 2, Eco 3. Migration to groundwater: Moderate PBT rating: P3B3T2 PMN: P3B3T1; : P3B3T2 Health: 1-2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0528file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0528file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0528file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110528.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:53:37 PM]
& #

#

#

# 86 œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ. >

Allegro q. = 120

f

œ œ

>

œ

>

œ. >œ œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m. 100, 2nd beat

fi

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ. 8 5 8 13

& #

#

#

# 8

21

8

29

Œ j

œ

. œ

. œ

.

œ

.

37

F

Str. Mute

 ̇. Œ Jœ

. œ

. œ

.

œ

.  ̇. 4

& #

#

#

# Œ j

œ

. œ

. œ

.

œ

.

45

F

 ̇. Œ jœ

. œ. œ

.

œ

. j

œ

.

‰ ‰ Œ. ‰

œ

.

œ

.

œ. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ. œ

.  ̇.

& #

#

#

# j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. 3 53

œ

.

œ

.

œ

.

œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ Œ.

& #

#

#

# !

61

‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ! ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ. œ. œ

j

œ

.  ̇.

& #

#

#

# j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. Œ j

œ

. œ

. œ

.

œ

.

69

F

Open

 ̇. Œ Jœ

. œ

. œ

.

œ

.  ̇. 4

Œ j

œ

. œ

. œ

.

œ

.

77

F

& #

#

#

#

 ̇. Œ jœ

. œ. œ

.

œ

. j

œ

.

‰ ‰ Œ. ‰

œ

.

œ

.

œ. Œ J

œ

. œ

. œ. œ

.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰ Œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Words & Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

40th Army Band, VTARNG

1st Bb Trumpet

The Official March of the National Guard Bureau -Full Orchestra VersionDedicated to the Men and Women, Soldiers and Airmen of America's National Guard
& #

#

#

# 3

85

œ

.

œ

.

œ

.

œ. ‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ Œ. !

93

& #

#

#

# ‰ œ

. œ. œ. œ. œ. ! ‰ œ. œ. œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ. œ. œ. ‰ œ. œ. œ

j

œ

.  ̇.

fi

j

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>

f

Ceremonial version,

from m. 4

& #

#

#

#

 ̇.

>

101

œ. œ.

>

 ̇.

>

J

œ ‰ ‰ œ œ œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇.

& #

#

#

# j

œ

‰ ‰

œ.

>

 ̇.

>

109

œ

j

nœ

- #œ- œ œ  ̇. œ ‰ œ œ

j

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.

& #

#

#

#  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>

 ̇.

>

117

œ j

œ

>

œ

>

j

œ

>

 ̇.

>

œ ‰ œbœ Jnœ œ. œ.

& #

#

#

# œ. œ.  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>

 ̇.

>

125

œ œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

 ̇.

>

J

œ ‰ ‰bœ

>

J

nœ

& #

#

#

# œ.

>

œ.

>

œ. >

œ.

>

œ.

>

œ

>

œ

>

2

ƒ

œ.

>

œ

>

œ

>

2

œ

>

J

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

2

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Official March of the National Guard Bureau

-1st Bb Trumpet2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 7, 2016

a1130

Order 

Clerk

December 7, 2016

152265

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152265

COA: 326464

Kent CC: 06-006804-FC

TERRILL LASHON LAMBETH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 16, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
---

# SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION

# WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

# FORM 8-K

# CURRENT REPORT

# PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (date of
earliest event reported):   December 19, 2003

# LAS VEGAS SANDS,
INC.

(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)

|                             |                          |                    
|---------------------------- | ------------------------ | -------------------
|NEVADA                       | 333-42147                | 04-3010100         
|(State or other jurisdiction | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer      
|of incorporation)            |                          | Identification No.)

|                                         |           
|---------------------------------------- | ----------
|3355 LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD SOUTH           |           
|LAS VEGAS, NEVADA                        | 89109     
|(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code)

Registrants
telephone number, including area code:   (702) 414-1000

# NOT APPLICABLE

(Former name or former
address, if changed since last report)

---

Item 5. Other Events and
Regulation FD Disclosure

On
December 18, 2003, Venetian Macau, S.A. (VMSA) and Venetian Macau Finance
Company (VMFC), each wholly owned indirect subsidiaries of Las Vegas Sands,
Inc., entered into a $20 million revolving credit facility with several lenders, The Bank
of Nova Scotia as Administrative Agent and The Bank of Nova Scotia Asia Limited as Lead
Arranger (the Credit Facility). Concurrently with entering into the Credit
Facility, all the proceeds from the issuance of the $120 million senior secured notes due
2008 (the Notes) issued by VMFC on August 21, 2003 were released from escrow
pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement dated as of August 21, 2003, by and among
VMFC, Scotiabank (Cayman Islands) Ltd. as escrow agent and U.S. Bank National Association
as trustee. Upon satisfaction of certain funding conditions, the proceeds from borrowings
under the Credit Facility and the issuance of the Notes will be available to develop,
construct, equip and open the Venetian Sands Macau casino in the Macau Special
Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China.

---

# SIGNATURES

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

Dated: December 19, 2003

| |  | LAS VEGAS SANDS, INC.By:       /s/ Harry D. Miltenberger            
Name:   Harry D. MiltenbergerTitle:     Vice President - Finance
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3030 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3030

   To require the Secretary of Labor to issue a notice to the public 
  regarding each enforcement action under the Occupational Safety and 
 Health Act of 1970 that results in large penalties or where multiple 
   violations or repeated other-than-serious violations are present.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 20, 2021

 Mr. Schatz (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mr. Menendez) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
               on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Labor to issue a notice to the public 
  regarding each enforcement action under the Occupational Safety and 
 Health Act of 1970 that results in large penalties or where multiple 
   violations or repeated other-than-serious violations are present.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping Workers Safe Act''.

SEC. 2. PUBLICIZING LARGE OSHA PENALTIES.

    Section 17 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 
U.S.C. 666) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(m) Disclosure of Large Civil Penalties.--
            ``(1) In general.--For each enforcement action against an 
        employer in which the Secretary has assessed civil penalties in 
        an amount greater than $60,000, or where multiple serious or 
        repeated other-than-serious violations are present, the 
        Secretary shall issue a notice to the public regarding the 
        enforcement action not later than 7 days after the date on 
        which the citation is issued.
            ``(2) Distribution.--The Secretary shall ensure that a 
        notice to the public issued under paragraph (1) is distributed 
        to relevant regional and local newspapers in the region in 
        which the employer subject to the enforcement action is 
        located, associated trade or industry organizations, relevant 
        labor organizations, and relevant State and local government 
        entities.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STACIA VICK and CHADWICK §

VICK

, §

§ No. 491, 2018

Plaintiffs Below

, §

Appellant s

, § Court Below : Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. K17C

- 09

- 007

DR. NASREEN KHAN, KHAN §

AND ASSOCIATES, P.A., §

BAYHEALTH INC., BAYHEALTH §

MEDICAL CENTER, and KENT §

GENERAL HOSPITAL, §

§

Defendants Below, §

Appellee s

. §

Submitted: December 20 , 2018

Decided: February 21 , 2019

Before VALIHURA

, VAUGHN and SEITZ

, Justices.

O R D E R

(1) The plaintiffs

- appellant s seek interlocutory review of the Superior

Court’s bench ruling of January 5, 2018 and the court’s order of August 22, 2018 in

the plaintiffs’ medical negligence action. The January 5, 2018 bench ruling

dismissed Counts III through VIII of the plaintiffs’ complaint as time

- barred. The2

August 22, 2018 order affirmed a Commissioner’s order denying the plaintiffs’

motion to amend the complaint

. 1

(2) By order dated September 19, 2018, t he Superior Court denied the

plaintiffs’ application for certification of an interlocutory appeal after finding that

neither the January 5 bench ruling nor the August 22 order determine d a substantial

issue of material importance meriting appellate review before final judgment

.

( 3 ) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound

discretion of this Court and are granted only in exceptional circumstances. 2 I n the

exercise of our discretion, we conclude that the plaintiffs’ application for

interlocutory review does not meet the strict standards for certification under

Supreme Court Rule 42.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal is

REFUSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice

1 2018 WL 4026692 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 22, 2018).

2 Del. Sup. Ct. R. 42(d)(v).
(4910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0680; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-195-AD; Amendme

3J-(>H.~~2010:dJ.?3

RIN 2120-AA64

Ainvorthiness Directives; Airbus Model A31 0 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

'ONCURREN(OS

\Jf1~G SYMOOl

N,'r'ALSlS'G

-1

c.~

mr-vv/'<J

UTlNGSYMOOL

-tau

I -if1

If) n/tD OUTING SYMBOL

SUM.MARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products lis cd

NmALSISIG

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

ROl)TING SYMBOL

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

Analysis performed in the frame of the Extended Service Goal has

led Airbus to modify the inspection programme [modification of

thresholds, intervals and associated configurations] which is

currently required by DGAC (Direction Generale de l'Aviation

Civile) France AD F-2005-001.

This modified inspection programme is necessary to detect and

prevent damage associated with a structural fatigue phenomenon of

the rear spar internal angle and the tee fitting located in the centre

wing box. This condition, if not corrected, could affect the

structural integrity of the centre wing box .

<Ol1I"ING 'YMBOL.

OlITlNG SYMBOL

~I;IM.SISIG

• • • • • • •

The unsafe condition is reduced structural integrity of the wings. We are issuing this AD
#### Byam vs. The State.

An indictment which declares that the jurors, being “ duly summoned, and then and there impanneled, sworn, &c., * * do present” &c., without using the words “upon their oaths,” sufficiently avers that the presentment is upon oath"

ERROR to tbe Circuit Court for *Sauk*County.

The case is stated in the opinion of. the court.

*Welch & Lamb*and *S. S.*Wilkinson, for the plaintiff in error.

*The Attorney General,*for the state.

*By the Court,*

Dixoít, C. J.

Indictment for assault with attempt to murder. After trial and verdict of guilty of. the assault, the plaintiff in error (defendant below) moved in arrest, of judgment, because it did not appear that the indictment was found upon the oaths of the grand jury. The motion was overruled, and the case comes here upon that question. The indictment contains two counts. Objection is taken only to the first. So far as material to the point at issue, it is in these words: “ The jurors of the grand jury, good and lawful men of the county of Dane, and state of Wisconsin, duly summoned and then and there impanneled, sworn and charged to inquire in and for the body of the county of Dane and state aforesaid, do present: That *Philander Byam,*late of,” &c.

We are of opinion that this was a sufficient averment that the offense charged in the first count was found and presented upon oath. The utmost accuracy of pleading and strictest adherence to form might possibly require the addition of the words *“upon their*oaths,"but this would be but repetition. When the count contains other equivalent expressions, it cannot be that the omission is fatal. It is at most but matter of inducement, and not of the substance of the accusation. We cannot therefore indulge in too much refinement upon the language employed. The jurors returned that being impanneled, *sworn*and charged, they made the presentment. This was a present. ment on oath. The jurors so understood it, and so must we. *146It does not appear from the report that tbe defective count in *State vs.*McAlister, 26 Maine, 374, contained this or any equivalent *recital.*If it had, it is obvious that the decision would have been different.

Judgment affirmed.
# Air National Guard units join Brazilian-led exercise

/ Published Nov. 6, 2013

NATAL AIR BASE, Brazil - The U.S. Air Force is taking part in Cruzeiro do Sul Exercise, a Brazilian air exercise that officially kicked off Nov. 4 and is scheduled to complete Nov. 15.

The Brazilian Air Force-led exercise combines coalition aerial refueling and Combat Search and Rescue structured training with a focus on interoperability. 

More than 130 U.S. Airmen are participating in CRUZEX alongside participants from Canada and multiple South American countries, totaling more than 2,000 military members between all countries.

More than 90 aircraft are taking part in CRUZEX.

The U.S. Air Force will participate with a KC-135 Stratotanker from the 161st Aerial Refueling Wing, Arizona Air National Guard, and six F-16s from the 113th Fighter Wing, District of Colombia Air National Guard,. The participants will be simulating a wide variety of events in a fictitious peacekeeping response scenario. 

"I am most excited about doing operations in a unique environment," said U.S. Air Force Col. Keith Colmer, 12th Air Force (Air Forces Southern) Air National Guard advisor. "We are very familiar with our operations in our area of responsibility, but being in Brazil there are obvious and unique differences with the culture, language skills, and the local environment. The second big point is being able to build friendships that will allow us to do our job at 12th Air Force better for years to come, because really, this whole operation is about building relationships."

The primary aim of CRUZEX is to prepare the attending air forces to work together in the future, whether it be during natural disasters, evacuating civilians or refueling aircraft.

"The biggest challenge is being sympathetic to the pacing of the host nation as they work through the challenge of hosting more than 2,000 of their own pilots and airmen as well as another 700 deployed airmen from several other countries," Colmer said. "There is a refined skill in that, and we practice that a lot with all the different exercises we host in the U.S."