alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | Diamond BlackHawk EGOM PSD/Title V Permit Application 129 Trinity Consultants 

### A	summary	of	the	proposed	PM/PM 10 

### /PM 2.5 

### BACT	emission	limitation	for	ea ch	source	associated	with	the project	is	provided	be low	in	Table	5‐20.

Table 5

‐ 20. Proposed PM/PM 10 

### /PM 2.5 

### BACT Emission Limits

Emission Unit BACT Emission Limit BACT Basis BACT Control Technologies Drillship	Main	Diesel	Engines (DR‐ME‐01	thru	DR‐ME‐06) PM/PM 10 /PM 2.5 – 2.47E‐04	lb/Hp‐hr (0.15	g/KW‐hr) NSPS	IIII Standards NSPS	IIII	standards, LNE	design	including Turbocharger	with Aftercooler	and	High Fuel	Pressure Injection,	ULSD	and Good	Combustion Practices Drillship	Emergency	Diesel Engine	(DR‐GE‐01) ‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	3, Table	3.4‐1 LNE	design,	ULSD	and Good	Combustion Practices Air	Compressor	Diesel	Engine (DR‐AC‐01) ‐‐ 40	CFR	89	EPA Tier	2	Standard ULSD,	EPA	Tier	2 Standard Good	Combustion Practices Third	Party	Engines	(DR‐TP‐01 through	DR‐TP‐11	and	DR‐TP‐17 through	DR‐TP‐21) ‐‐ 40	CFR	89	EPA Tier	2	Standard 40	CFR	89	EPA	Tier	2 Standard	and	LNE design Third	Party	Well	Evaluation Engines	(DR‐TP‐12	through	DR‐ TP‐16) ‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	3, Table	3.3‐1 Good	Combustion Practices

Stimulation	Vessel	Pumps	(SV‐ PE‐01	thru	SV‐PE‐08) ‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	3, Table	3.4‐1 Good	Combustion Practices Flowback	Boiler	(DR‐WC‐05)	 ‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	1, Table	1.3‐1 Good	Combustion Practices Boom	Flare	(DR‐WC‐06)	 ‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	1, Table	1.4‐2 Compliance	with	40 CFR	60.18	and	Good Combustion	Practices Cement	and	Mud	Mixing Operations	(DR‐DC‐01	thru DR‐DC‐03) ‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	11, Table	11.12‐2 Dust	Collectors

Painting	Operations	(DR‐PO‐01)	 ‐‐ Paint	Composition	 Best	Managem ent Practices Welding	Operations	(DR‐WO‐ 01)	 ‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	12, Table	12.19‐1 Best	Management Practices
Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-99114)  pertaining to the Law Companies  Group,  Inc. 401(k) Savings
Plan of our report dated June 12, 2001, with respect to the financial statements
and supplemental  schedule of the Law Companies Group,  Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan
included in this Annual Report (Form 11-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                     /s/  Ernst & Young LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
June 28, 2000
CONWAY ORLANDO 

THOMAS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-495

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 11, 2016. 

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

James B. Fensom, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6752

JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID S. KUYKENDALL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-96-409-R)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 12, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court orders dismissing his

habeas corpus petition without prejudice for failure to set forth

coherent claims and denying his motion for reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the orders are not

appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The

orders here appealed are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.

We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal

as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The motion for hearing in banc is denied.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             272
<SECURITIES>                                       111
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,486
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,917
<PP&E>                                             226
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,886
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,145
<SALES>                                         12,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,940
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,805)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,805)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77


</TABLE>
& b 8

6 œ

>

œ

>

œ

> >

œ. Allegro

f

œ œ

>

œ

> >

œ. œ œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ œ.

F

 ̇.

5

œ. œ.  ̇.

& b J

œ ‰ ‰ œ œ œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. j

œ ‰ ‰

œ.  ̇.

13

œ j

#œ

- œ

- œ œ  ̇.

& b œ ‰ œ œ J

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ œ.

>

 ̇.

>

21

œ j

œ

>

œ

>

j

œ

>

 ̇.

>

& b œ ‰ œnœ J

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. J

œ ‰ ‰ œ. >

f

 ̇. >

29

œ œ

>

œ

> œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

 ̇.

>

& b J

œ ‰ ‰nœ

>

J

œ œ. >

œ. >

œ. >

œ.

>

œ.

>

œ

>

œ

>

ƒ 2

œ.

>

œ

>

œ

>

2

œ

>

J

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ.

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

Words & Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

40th Army Band, VTARNG

1st Bb Trumpet

The Official Song of the National Guard Bureau

Dedicated to the Men and Women, Soldiers and Airmen of America's National Guard

Brass Quintet - Ceremonial Version
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00009-CR

Darryn BURGESS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR0646

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we MODIFY the judgment to reflect 

that Burgess was convicted of Count II, “Assault Upon a Public Servant (Habitual),” with an 

affirmative deadly weapon finding, and AFFIRM the judgment as modified.

SIGNED December 7, 2016.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1


                             Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-42743, 333-62131, 333-73807, 333-83229, 333-87493, and 333-61746 on Form S-8
and No. 333-86473 and 333-61748 on Form S-3 of NCO Group, Inc. of our report
dated February 12, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of NCO Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2001.



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 19, 2002
# Minnesota Air Guard Airmen support Al Dhafra operations

/ Published Dec. 10, 2021

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES - Forward-deployed to Al Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab Emirates, 16 Airmen from the Minnesota Air National Guard’s 148th Fighter Wing are ensuring mission readiness at a key warfighting location.

The Airmen represent career specialties from across the Air Force spectrum. They provide critical infrastructure to keep the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing at the base flying aircraft and supporting the Air Force mission in the Middle East.

“It’s a dirty job, and it never stops flowing,” said Tech. Sgt. Darick Kvam, a plumber with the 380th Expeditionary Civil Engineer Squadron. He and Staff Sgt. Wyatt Simsonson, a fellow Minnesota plumber, keep water and sewage operations at ADAB flowing.

The CE plumbing job is critical to keeping the base operating but seldom gets much spotlight.

Other Minnesota Airmen are working in supply, emergency management, heating and cooling, medical and administrative positions. The Airmen traditionally serve as the 148th home base in Duluth.

Staff Sgt. Makayla Nordean serves as the commander’s administrative assistant in the 908th Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron. In Minnesota, she serves a similar role in her traditional one weekend per month duties. While the Duluth unit flies F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter aircraft and the 908th flies KC-10 Extenders, air-to-air-refueling aircraft, Nordean’s administrative duties are about the same at the two bases. What she really misses, however, is something else from home.

“I’m a preschool teacher in my civilian job, so I am used to getting lots of hugs from my 4-year-old students every day,” she said. “I really miss seeing kids every day.”

The Minnesota Airmen are serving about six months away from home and agreed it is a morale booster to have several people from their home unit at ADAB with them. This is the first major deployment for most of the group, and having a few friendly faces around is helpful.

As is typical in an Air National Guard unit, the Airmen said they mostly all knew each other before deployment and get a lift from seeing each other around the base in ADAB.

The team also represents a wide range of ages.

“I think youngest is 21 and the oldest ... well, let’s just say the oldest is probably old enough to be the mother of the 21-year-old,” said Tech. Sgt. Shelly Zupetz, the administrative assistant to the 380th Wing’s command chief master sergeant.

The 380th Wing’s E-3 Sentries (AWACS), RQ-4 Global Hawks and KC-10 Extenders are a unique combination of aircraft that act as the “eyes and ears,” serve as guardians of the sky and provide greater range and endurance for coalition aircraft throughout the Central Command region.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Presley Lopez, * From the 358th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. D-45,749.

Vs. No. 11-16-00192-CR * December 8, 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 314 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 39
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 314

                          [Report No. 117-11]

             To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2021

Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

                             April 14, 2021

               Reported by Mr. Schatz, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Repeal 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    Public Law 89-224 (commonly known as the ``Klamath Tribe Judgment 
Fund Act'') (79 Stat. 897) is repealed.

SEC. 3. DISBURSEMENT OF REMAINING FUNDS.

    Notwithstanding any provision of Public Law 89-224 (79 Stat. 897) 
(as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) 
relating to the distribution or use of funds, as soon as practicable 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall disburse to the Klamath Tribe the balance of any funds that, on 
or before the date of enactment of this Act, were appropriated or 
deposited into the trust accounts for remaining legal fees and 
administration and per capita trust accounts, as identified by the 
Secretary of the Interior, under that Act (as in effect on the day 
before the date of enactment of this Act).
                                                        Calendar No. 39

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 314

                          [Report No. 117-11]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

             To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 14, 2021

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 99.23

News
Release
July 3, 2000

Trading Symbols:TRBD (EASDAQ)

TURBODYNE ANNOUNCES MANAGEMENT CHANGES

Carpinteria, CAJuly 3, 2000Effective July 8, 2000, Peter Kitzinski will relinquish
his post as General Manager of Turbodyne Europe GmbH and his position as VP Corporate Finance Europe of Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD). Mr. Kitzinski has served in these capacities for
several years and has assisted the Company to develop strong relationships with European automotive manufacturers and the investment community.

Mr.
Kitzinski will continue to serve as a Member of the Board of Directors of Turbodyne Technologies Inc. and as a Member of its Executive Committee where his special focus on
financial and investment matters will be of continuing assistance to the Company.

Turbodyne
Europe GmbH will continue to have its office located in Frankfurt, Germany, where Markus Kumbrink and Maxime Kremer will continue to provide day to day support for
Turbodyne's business and shareholder interests in Europe.

Professor
Dr.-Ing. Peter Hofbauer, Chairman of the Board of Turbodyne Technologies Inc., said, "The Board appreciates the contribution that Peter Kitzinski has made to the Company and
respects the personal and private reasons for his decision." He added, "We are very pleased that he will continue to be an active Member of the Board of Directors."

Turbodyne
Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company, specializes in the development of charging technology for internal combustion engines plus the development and
manufacturing of high-tech assemblies for electrically assisted turbochargers and superchargers.
Turbodyne Technologies Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European business location is Frankfurt, Germany.

Contacts:

Kenneth
Fitzpatrick, VP Group FinanceInvestor Relations at Turbodyne
  Headquarters: (800) 566-1130
Markus Kumbrink, Turbodyne Frankfurt Investor Relations: +49-69-69-76-73-13
Peter WeichselbraunMedia Contact at Turbodyne Headquarters: (800) 566-1130

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 66 (Tuesday, April 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07949]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9084]


Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy Notice of 
Charter Renewal

    The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the Advisory 
Committee on International Economic Policy. The Committee serves in a 
solely advisory capacity concerning major issues and problems in 
international economic policy. The Committee provides information and 
advice on the effective integration of economic interests into overall 
foreign policy and on the Department of State's role in advancing U.S. 
economic and commercial interests in a competitive global economy. The 
Committee also appraises the role and limits of international economic 
institutions and advises on the formulation of U.S. economic policy and 
positions.
    This Committee includes representatives of U.S. organizations and 
institutions having an interest in international economic policy, 
including representatives of U.S. business, state and local government, 
labor unions, public interest groups, and trade and professional 
associations.
    For further information, please call Gregory Maggio, Office of 
Economic Policy Analysis and Public Diplomacy, Bureau of Economic and 
Business Affairs, U.S. Department of State, at (202) 647-2231.

    Dated: March 20, 2015.
Gregory F. Maggio.
Designated Federal Officer, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs, 
U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-07949 Filed 4-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 4710-07-P
# Georgia Guard members bring Christmas spirit to the community

/ Published Dec. 21, 2016

MARIETTA, Ga. - Twenty Georgia Army National Guard Soldiers brought holiday cheer Tuesday to the residents of the Azalea Manor Assisted Living Facility in Marietta. The Guard members sang Christmas carols, chatted with residents and played multiple rounds of Bingo.

  "We wanted to do something to give back to the community," said Lt. Col. Alexander McLemore, director of logistics for the Georgia Army National Guard. "Rather than conduct an office gift exchange, the Soldiers decided to take gifts for others."

  Among the gifts the Soldiers brought were slippers, warm socks, blankets and home-baked cookies. The Guard members distributed gifts to the smiling residents and even sang happy birthday to Beatrice Hudson, who had just turned 85.

  "This was the perfect opportunity for us to make a difference," said Sgt 1st Class Maurika Flores, a budget analyst with the Georgia Army National Guard Directorate of Logistics. Flores and the other Soldiers circulated among the residents sharing stories and cheer during their visit.

  The Guard members embarked on their merry mission from the nearby Clay National Guard Center, which is home to the Georgia Guard's Joint Force Headquarters as well as two of the Georgia Army National Guard's five brigades.

  Most of the Georgia Guardsmen who visited the Azalea Manor residents have deployed overseas, some multiple times. For many, the experience of being away from home and family during the holidays gave an additional sense of purpose to their mission to Azalea Manor.

  "Honestly, I don't know who benefited more from this visit, the residents or our Soldiers,"  McLemore said.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in *Herberg, et al.* v. *United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.,* Civil No. 14-1443 DWF/LIB, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on February 27, 2015.

This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed against the United States by Thomas Lloyd Herberg, Bruce Allen Herberg, and D & G Drainage, Inc., pursuant to the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251, *et seq.,* and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551, *et seq.,* to challenge an Administrative Order for Compliance issued to Plaintiffs for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations, as well as the United States' potential enforcement counterclaims, by requiring the Plaintiffs to perform mitigation and to pay a civil penalty.

The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Daniel R. Dertke, Senior Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Environmental Defense Section, Post Office Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044 and refer to *Herberg, et al.* v. *United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.,* DJ #90-5-1-4-20160.

The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, United States Courthouse, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202, Minneapolis, MN 55415. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined electronically at *http://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​Consent_​Decrees.html.*

Cherie L. Rogers, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 2015-07150 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4410-15-P