alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.14





 Exhibit 10.14 

 
 



 
 November 28, 2012 

Bjarne Bergheim 
 26362 Ibeza Rd 

Mission Viejo, CA 92692 
 Dear Bjarne: 

On behalf of Sonendo, Inc, (the “Company”), I am pleased to offer you the position of President & Chief Executive Officer, effective as of July
1, 2012 (the “Effective Date”). 
 The primary duties and areas of responsibility of this role have been discussed with you previously. Your
compensation for this full-time position will be $250,000.00 per annum, paid semi-monthly. You will be eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount of up to twenty percent (20%) of your base salary based upon mutually agreed upon objectives.

 I will also recommend to the Sonendo Board of Directors that you receive stock options in accordance with Sonendo’s Stock Option Plan. 

The company’s scheduled working hours are 8:00a-5:00p (PT), Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. It is of
course understood that your role may require you to work outside of scheduled working hours as is customary for your position in the Company. 
 The Company
offers a benefits package that includes medical and dental insurance. Details about these benefits will be discussed with you when you start in your position. You will receive five week’s vacation, which accrue on a monthly basis. In addition,
the Company offers several paid holidays per year (see attached schedule). 
 Upon commencement of your employment you will need to sign the Company’s
standard Patent, Copyright and Non-Disclosure Agreement. 
 Your employment with the Company will be “at
will,” which means that either you or the Company may terminate your employment at any time for any reason whatsoever upon thirty (30) days’ written notice. However, in the event that your employment is terminated by the Company
without cause or there is a change of control of the Company, you shall be entitled to continue to be compensated by the Company, at your then annual base salary, for a period of twelve (12) months. A determination as to whether or not your
employment is being terminated “for cause” shall be made in good faith by the Board. 
  

26051 MERIT CIRCLE. SUITE 102 

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 

PH:949.348.1188 












 



 
 Bjame, this is a very exciting opportunity to be part of building a company from the ground floor. I am looking forward to
your contributions to our success. If this offer meets with your approval, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter where indicated below. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ Erik Amble
	Erik Amble
	Compensation Committee Chairman
	Sonendo Board of Directors


  

	
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED this
	
	28th day of November, 2012
	
	 /s/ Bjarne Bergheim

	Bjarne Bergheim

  
 26051 MERIT
CIRCLE, SUITE 102 
 LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 

PH: 949.348.1188
December 8, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AMANDA CHRISTINE GARZA, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00902-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT**

**CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

Cash Technologies, Inc. 

Los Angeles, California 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Cash Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-41536) of our report dated July 31, 2002 relating to the consolidated financialstatements of Cash Technologies, Inc. as of May 31, 2003 and for the year then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as agoing concern. 

 

Los Angeles, California 

 

July 31, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1822

KEVIN ROBERTSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District 

Judge. (1:16-cv-00106-CCB)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan S. Cohen, Karen 

Grace Gregory, John Schumann, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his challenge to a wage levy issued by the Internal 

Revenue Service. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Robertson v. United States, No. 1:16-cv00106-CCB (D. Md. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Florida Army Guard Soldiers team with Navy, Coast Guard to provide port security in Djibouti
 
  By Army Staff Sgt. Aidana Baez
Petition for Exemption

I am requesting an exemption for to fly a drone under 200 feet. The purpose is to take photos of my clients homes that are for sale. I could not find an official form for this. Thank you for your consideration Sherry Mattox 5871 Brassie Ridge Lane Ellenwood, GA 30294 770
- 593
- 4761
##### 



Exhibit 12.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO RULE 13a-14(a) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)) ORRULE 15d-14(a) (17 CFR
240.15d-14(a)), PROMULGATED UNDER SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 I, Marcel Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of SCOR, certify that:  1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SCOR;2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.

The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:  a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.

The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys
auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of
directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial
reporting. Date: April 29, 2005 By:
/s/ Marcel
KahnName:
Marcel KahnTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
ex4_5.htm


Exhibit 4.5



 



		
 


 


Maxclean Holdings Limited


88 Yu Feng Road, Shuo Fang Town, New District


Wuxi, Jiangsu, China


Tel: +86 8526 1966


http://www.maxclean.com







 


Mr. Zhong Wei (钟卫)


 


Present


 


Date: October 8, 2012


 


Dear Mr. Zhong,


 


OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT


 


It is our pleasure to extend the following offer of employment to you.


 


Title: Chief Financial Officer


 


Report to: Mr. Wong Siu Hong, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)


 


Key Responsibilities including but not limited to:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Endure the financial activities, recordings and reports of the company including its subsidiaries (hereafter called COMPANY) are proper for the purposes of the COMPANY and in compliance with the related statutory requirements.








	
  

	
2.

	
Manage the direct and indirect subordinates.








	
  

	
3.

	
Financial planning and budgetary control








	
  

	
4.

	
Work with other department managers to achieve the COMPANY’s objectives.








	
  

	
5.

	
Assist the CEO to achieve his business goals including the company listing.







 


Base Salary:  Will be paid monthly of RMB 40,000.


 


Probation Period: 3 months from the date of employment


 


Employment Date: October 8, 2012


 


Your employment with Maxclean (China) Holdings Co. Ltd. is at-will and either party can terminate the relationship with 1 month notice which cannot be replaced by leave accrued.


 




  





  











  








		
 


 


Maxclean Holdings Limited


88 Yu Feng Road, Shuo Fang Town, New District


Wuxi, Jiangsu, China


Tel: +86 8526 1966


http://www.maxclean.com







 




This letter is signed after the employment date and the late singing will not in any aspect affects the intended purpose of the letter.  Should you agree with the above please sign to confirm.


 


Signatures:


 







 



		 





 


 


 


Confirmed by




 


 



	





 


Date:October 8, 2012
Chemical identity Chemical structure 

Batch identification Date of production (test item) 

Origin of test item 

PSN 

CAS no. 

Sponsor 

Date of receipt of order 

Date of receipt of test item 

Testing facility 

Study director Storage cond. test item 

Test period 

Storage of records Storage of sample of test item 
1 Appearance and Homogeneity 

Method Visual inspection 

Result At ambient temperature, the test item was a brown, viscous liquid. Date of test 

Head of laboratory 

2 Identity 

Method 

Apparatus 

Sample preparation 

Test parameters 

Result Date of test 

Head of laboratory 

It was seemingly homogeneous. 

July 19, 2012 

IR Spectroscopy 

Nicolet 6700 

Test item was measured as film between KBr windows. 

Resolution: 4.000 cm-1 Number of scans: 32 

Temperature: ambient 

TheIR spectrum (page 6) shows the signals expected for the test 

item. 

July 23, 2012 
Reagents 

Sample preparation 

Test parameters 

Results 

About 50 mg of the test item were weighed into a 10 ml volumetric 

flask dissolved and filled up to the mark with THF. The test item was 

obviously dissolved and was filtered (0.2 j..Jm filter, Millex) before GPC 

measurement. 

Columns: combination of 3 columns; 

manufactured by Polymer Laboratories. 

1) and 2) Mini-Mix C, 250mm x 4.6 mm i.d., dp = 5 IJm 

3) Mini-Mix E, 250mm x 4.6 mm i.d.,dp = 3 j..Jm 

Mobile phase: THF 

Flow: 0.3 mllmin 

Injection volume: 20 IJI 

Temperature: 35 oc 

Detection: refractive index 

Calibration curve see page 7. 
Date of test 

Head of laboratory 

4 

Method 

Apparatus 

Reagents 

Sample preparation 

GC conditions 
Result 

Date of test 

Head of laboratory
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vapor Fuel Technologies, Inc. on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending  December 31, 2002, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, C. Thomas Davis,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ C. Thomas Davis
C. Thomas Davis
Chief Executive Officer
January 13, 2004



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Raymond P. Dolan, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



Date: May 3, 2011/s/ RAYMOND P. DOLAN Raymond P. Dolan President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
*

 Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

No. 01-50839

__________________________

TOWNER LEEPER; LA FONNE LEEPER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(No. EP-98-CV-229-H)

___________________________________________________

October 9, 2002

Before GARWOOD and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.*

PER CURIAM:**

The district court’s findings of fact were not clearly erroneous and it correctly granted

summary judgment. We therefore AFFIRM.

The I.R.S.must give a representative,suchasMr.Leeper’s attorney-in-fact, notice ofseizures
1

 The Leepers waived their entitlement to the costs of the action under § 7433(b)(2) by

failing to appeal it. Green v. State Bar of Texas, 27 F.3d 1083, 1089 (5th Cir. 1994) .

2

and sales. 26 U.S.C. § 6335; 26 CFR § 601.506(a). Nevertheless, “[f]ailure to give notice or other

written communication to the recognized representative of a taxpayer will not affect the validity of

any notice or the written communication delivered to the taxpayer. 26 CFR § 601.506(a)(3). The

district court found Mr. Leeper received the notice required by § 6335. Mr. Leeper points to no

other statutory or regulatory violation to serve as a basis for his § 7433 claim; he has no valid claim

for damages, heart attack or otherwise.

The I.R.S. admitted violating § 6335 with regards to Ms. Leeper. Nevertheless, the district

court held Ms. Leeper was not damaged as a “proximate result” of the lack of notice of sale for the

Brown judgment, as she deferred decisions regarding the Brown judgment to her husband, Mr.

Leeper. The Leepers attempt to bolster the importance of § 6335 notice, and somehow avoid the

language of § 7433, by pointing to a pre-§ 7433 case, Reece v. Scoggins, 506 F.2d 967 (5th Cir.

1975). This argument is unpersuasive. The dangers and policy articulated in Reece may well have

been the motivating factor for the initial enactment of § 7433 byCongressin 1988. In any event, the

district court’s finding on the “proximate results” issue is not clearly erroneous.

The Leepers seek administrative and litigation costs under § 7430, which awardsthese costs

to the prevailing party. § 7430(a). The Leepers concede they are not a prevailing party under the

district court’s final judgment, and § 7430 does not afford them recovery.1

Ms. Leeper complains the district court erroneously determined her 1995 tax liability. Ms.

Leeper failed to produce any evidence why she was entitled to a tax credit for the taxes withheld by

Towner Leeper Attorney P.C.
3

AFFIRMED.
EX- 4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 
 The sixth amendment to the Interconnection Agreement between PT Telekomunikasi Seluler (“Telkomsel”) and PT Indosat Tbk (“Indosat”) as stipulated in the Cooperation Agreement for
Interconnection between Indosat and Telkomsel on Interconnection between Telkomsel’s Cellular Mobile Network and Indosat’s Fixed Local Telecommunication Network, No. Telkomsel: Amd.684/LG.05/PD-00/V/2012—No. Indosat:
06/C00-C0HA/LGL/2012 dated May 28, 2012. 
 The Parties: 

 

	1.	PT Telkomsel; and 

  

	2.	PT Indosat Tbk 

 Scope of The
Amendment: 
 The sixth amendment was made to implement the Indonesian Telecommunication Regulatory Authority (“BRTI”) letter
No.262/BRTI/XII/2011 dated December 12, 2011 (“BRTI Letter”) regarding the change of SMS fee from a sender-keeps-all scheme to a cost-based scheme which was implemented on June 1, 2012. There were amendments to this sixth
amendment as follows: 
  

	1.	Billing; 

  

	2.	SMS Interconnection Tariff; 

  

	3.	Technical Data; 

  

	4.	Call Scenario and Routing; 

  

	5.	Finance Settlement; 

  

	6.	Clearing Data Exchange Format; and 

  

	7.	Volume Compare Format. 

 Period of
Amendment: 
 This sixth amendment became effective on June 1, 2012 and has the same expiration date as the Cooperation Agreement.

 SMS Interconnection Tariff:  
  

					
	 No
	  	 Type of Service
	  	 Tariff (IDR/SMS)

	1.	  	SMS	  	23
		  		  	
		  		  	
		  		  	








 The latest addendum to the Interconnection Agreement between Telkomsel and Indosat as stipulated in the
Cooperation Agreement for Interconnection between Indosat and Telkomsel on Interconnection between Telkomsel’s Cellular Mobile Network and Indosat’s Fixed Local Telecommunication Network, as set forth in the mutual office minutes, No.
Telkomsel : 005/IC.01/MO-01/III/2013 – No. Indosat : 004/C00-C0H/LGL/2013 dated March 8, 2013. 
 The Parties:

  

	1.	PT Telkomsel; and 

  

	2.	PT Indosat Tbk 

 Scope of the Mutual
Office Minutes: 
 The use of managed services SMS hubber by Telkomsel where Telkomsel will connect the GSMSC/STP Telkomsel through
managed services SMS hubber to GSMSC/STP Indosat. 
 Period of Mutual Office Minutes: 

These mutual office minutes are effective from March 8, 2013 until March 7, 2014.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Brad Johnson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ultra Petroleum Corp.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

| /s/  Brad Johnson          |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Brad Johnson,                                                                     |
| Interim Chief Executive Officer                                                   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                                                     |

Date: April 25, 2018
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 27, 2010 

y0920 

Order 

 

September 27, 2010 

141175 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141175 

 COA: 297137 

Livingston CC: 09-018295-FH 

JAMES GLENN STAMPER, 09-018296-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 09-018297-FH 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 30, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SonusNetworks, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2003 and asamended on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ellen B. Richstone,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: June 10, 2005 | /s/ Ellen B. Richstone                                   |   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Ellen B. Richstone                                       |   |
|                     | *Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

1

----