alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
condensed consolidated financial statements which are included in the
registrant's Form 10-Q for the period ended 9/30/00 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001104219
<NAME> SERANOVA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,481
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,097
<PP&E>                                          10,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,282
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           175
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,207
<SALES>                                         59,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,287
<CGS>                                           29,550
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     9
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (7,196)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,066)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,934)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,132)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,132)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)


</TABLE>
Opinion issued November 16 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00835
- CV

——————————— IN RE GENESIS MARINE, LLC AND GENESIS ENERGY, LLC , Relat or s

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDU M OPINION On November 8, 2023, relators Genesis Marine LLC and Genesis Energy LLC filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s October 3, 2023 order compelling discovery responses within seven days. 1 We deny the petition.
PER CURIAM
Panel con sists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Landau and Rivas

- Molloy.

1 The underlying case is Donald R. Menefield v. Genesis Marine, LLC and Genesis Energy, LLC , cause number 2021

- 19883 , pending in the 270th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Dedra Davis presiding.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0018 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 - SW - 060 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Claude E. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
     and

         2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  June 9, 2005                     /s/ Todd M. Pitcher
                                         -----------------------
                                         Name Todd M. Pitcher
                                         Title Interim Chief Financial Officer


                                       42
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 08, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 08, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0561. IN RE: SHAREE BAPS CORP. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 17CV67030
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            69,905
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      12,376
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  84,131
<CASH>                                           5,668
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               3,785
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           6,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,462
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 55,371
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             34,378
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  3,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,462
<PREMIUMS>                                      53,592
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,321
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,385
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     321
<BENEFITS>                                      44,359
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     12,076
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             6,531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,347)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,427)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,920)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,920)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  52,091
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             43,802
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  557
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              29,649
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                16,285
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 55,371
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (6,187)


</TABLE>
CONSENT OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

Board
of Directors and Shareholders
Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Carpinteria, California

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-64133) on Form S-8 of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our report dated April 6, 2001 relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries.

Our
report, dated April 6, 2001, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered net losses in each of the last five years, is subject to numerous lawsuits, including those
brought against it by shareholders, and based on projected cash flows for the ensuing year the Company will require additional equity or debt financing in order to continue its present operations.
These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of these uncertainties.

McGowan
Guntermann

Santa
Barbara, California
April 17, 2001

---

QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2317 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
Petitioner > No. 125 DB 2013

: Attorney Registration No. 200894
Vv. :
: (Philadelphia County)
ROBERT CRAIG ATTIG, :

Respondent

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2° day of December, 2016, upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint
Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Robert Craig Attig is
suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year. He

shall comply with all provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 8, 2016

No. 04-16-00370-CR

Robert Michael RIDINGS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 486449

The Honorable Crystal D. Chandler, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellee’s motion for extension of time to file its brief is granted. 

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-1042 

LT Case No. 2018-CF-001358

_____________________________

 

MARCUS ZOHRON MORGAN, 

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County. 

Joel Fritton, Judge. 

Marcus Zohron Morgan, Carrabelle, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee.

August 15, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

MAKAR, WALLIS, and MACIVER, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
Subject: Meeting with Air Permitting Forum and Affiliates – RTR Proposal

Location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC

Date: September 19, 2012

Participants:

Air Permitting Forum

Shannon Broome

Linda Lowe

Paul Sheehan

Gary Stahle

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Rochelle Boyd

Chuck French

Stef Johnson

Scott Throwe

RTI International

Mark Bahner

Mike Laney

The purpose of the meeting was to review the issues raised by the Air Permitting Forum in their 

comments on the February 14, 2012, proposed amendments to the secondary aluminum 

production NESHAP. In particular, the Air Permitting Forum reviewed their comments on:

• Alternatives to Methods 1 and 2 for annual inspection of capture and collection systems.

• Demonstration of compliance with capture/collection systems designed according to 

ACGIH guidelines.

• Incorporation by reference of ACGIH guidelines.

• Implication of proposed general duty requirements [63.1506(a)(5) for requirements for 

operation, maintenance and monitoring (OM&M) plan (63.1510(b).

• Specifications for scrap cleaning processes.

• Definition of capture and collection system.

• Definition of clean charge.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4



                          KEY AUTO FINANCE TRUST 1997-2
                        OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICER


To: Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware, as Owner Trustee
    Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee
    Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
    Standard & Poor's Ratings Group
    Fitch Investors Service, L.P.


         Pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as
of December 16, 1997 among Key Auto Finance Trust 1997-2, as Issuer, Key
Consumer Acceptance Corporation, as Seller, Key Bank USA, National Association,
as Servicer and Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee (the "Agreement"),
the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of Servicer
from the Closing Date (December 16, 1997) through December 31, 1998, and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's
supervision and (ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based
on such review, Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations in all material
respects under the Agreement throughout such period.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate this 26th day of
March, 1999.


                                KEY BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
                                as Servicer



                                By: /S/ Craig T. Platt
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Craig T. Platt
                                    Senior Vice President



                                    Page 19
#### Wall v. Pittsburgh, Lisbon & Western Railroad Company.

*Practice, C. P.*— *Statement of claim*— *Signature of attorney*— *Act of May U, 1915.*

Where plaintiff is represented by an attorney, the statement of claim must be signed by such attorney. The Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483, is mandatory in this respect.

Motion to strike off statement. C. P. Beaver Co., Dec. T., 1921, No. 542.

*W. A. McConnel,*for plaintiff; *Reed & Reed,*for defendant.

April 5, 1922.

Baldwin, P. J.,

In support of this motion, defendant's counsel has filed five reasons. At the argument, however, all of same were abandoned except the last, which is as follows: “It (plaintiff’s statement) is not signed by the attorney, although plaintiff is represented by an attorney.”

Section 9 of the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483, provides in part as follows: “The statement of claim . . . shall be sworn to by the plaintiff or some person having knowledge of the facts, and if there be an attorney, shall be signed by his attorney.”

The question for our decision is whether the above quoted provision, relating to the signing of plaintiff’s statement by plaintiff’s attorney, is mandatory or merely directory.

In our opinion it is mandatory. The provision relating to the signing of the statement by plaintiff’s attorney is in the same sentence with the provision requiring the statement to be “sworn to by the plaintiff or some person having knowledge of the facts.” There is, of course, no doubt that the provision last quoted is mandatory, and it would seem to be equally free from doubt that the same is true of the provision requiring the statement to be signed by the attorney, if any.

The late Judge Ralston, in discussing this section of the Practice Act before the Pittsburgh Law Club on Dec. 27, 1915, said: “If there be an attorney, he must sign the statement, which makes him responsible for its allegations— not for their truth, but for their relevancy and the propriety of making them. An attorney cannot file a statement containing scandalous and irrelevant statements and shift the responsibility upon his client.”

*Order.*

Now, April 5, 1922, the plaintiff’s statement is struck from the record, unless plaintiff’s attorney shall, within ten days next hereafter, sign the plaintiff’s statement.

From F. H. Laird, Beaver, Pa.
# Tricare announces H1N1 immunization policy

/ Published Nov. 3, 2009

FALLS CHURCH, Va. - Immunizations against the H1N1 virus will soon be available, and people are eager to take precautions. Tricare Prime, Standard and Extra beneficiaries can get their shots from network and non-network providers without paying a deductible or making a co-payment.

A temporary waiver allows retired Tricare Prime enrollees to get the H1N1 immunization from non-network providers without a referral or authorization, eliminating point-of-service charges. Prime enrollees will not be charged a co-payment or cost share.

Tricare for Life beneficiaries must follow Medicare rules regarding H1N1 vaccine. Medicare will pay for administering the H1N1 vaccine, but not the H1N1 vaccine itself if it is supplied to providers free of charge. Payment will be subject to normal billing and payment rules that apply to influenza vaccine.

Preventive medicine is a very important part of Tricare's goal of keeping retirees and families healthy, said Rear Adm. Christine Hunter, deputy director of the Tricare Management Activity.

"To that end, we make getting vaccinated as convenient and affordable as possible," she said. "Beneficiaries should talk to their primary care manager if they have any questions about the H1N1 vaccine or other vaccines."

The vaccine for the seasonal flu is not expected to protect against H1N1, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials; therefore, immunization for the 2009 H1N1 strain is recommended. Both vaccines can be administered on the same day.

Officials with CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends that everyone get the H1N1 vaccine, but for certain groups the vaccination is more critical. These include:
      - Pregnant women
      - People who live with or care for children younger than 6 months;
      - Healthcare and emergency medical services personnel;
      - Everyone between the ages of 6 months and 24 years;
      - People ages 25 through 64 with chronic health disorders or compromised immune systems; and
      - Older people with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, asthma or HIV.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.9

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Glenn P. Dickes, Scott L. Seybold and Barry F.
Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the PANAVISION INC. (the
"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and
on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or
officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any
instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the
Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of
attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable
securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 28th
day of March, 2001.



                                          /S/ WILLIAM C. SCOTT
                                          ---------------------
                                          William C. Scott