alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015312EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 September 2015

(2015/C 312/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1250 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4608 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72430 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3300 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0906 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2205 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,053 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,12 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1866 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4210 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3612 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5693 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4831 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7188 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7696 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5843 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 325,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0071 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1643 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6363 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 280,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7931 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,274 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,1125 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,269 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4529 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6722 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,9297 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1250

JPY

Japanese yen

135,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4608

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72430

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3300

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0906

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2205

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,053

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,12

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1866

RON

Romanian leu

4,4210

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3612

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5693

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4831

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7188

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7696

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5843

KRW

South Korean won

1 325,46

ZAR

South African rand

15,0071

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1643

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6363

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 280,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7931

PHP

Philippine peso

52,274

RUB

Russian rouble

74,1125

THB

Thai baht

40,269

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4529

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6722

INR

Indian rupee

73,9297

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          28,769
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                       705
<INVENTORY>                                      9,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,937
<PP&E>                                          40,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,424
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,874
<SALES>                                         31,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,797
<CGS>                                           23,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (100)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (439)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    489
<INCOME-TAX>                                       223
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    460
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       726
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2020

NO. 03

- 20

- 00295

- CV

S. C. M., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEF ORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by t he tr i a l court on May 28, 2 020

. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. Because appellant is indigen t

an d u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Innovation,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Chad D.
Lee, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date:                                   | November 15, 2005 | 
|--------------------------------------- | ----------------- | 
|                                        |                   | 
|                                        |                   | 
|                                        |                   | 
|/s/ Chad
      D. Lee                   |                  
|Chad D.
      Lee, President, Director, |                  
|Principal Executive Officer             |                  

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7615

JAMES F. TERRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAPTAIN TUCKER; RON ANGELONE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-511-R)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James F. Terry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a

filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th

Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the

case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee

order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Crim. No. 2576.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

July 18, 1934.]

#### In the Matter of the Application of LUTHER GLANCY for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

*767Alexander L. Oster for Petitioner.

Buron Fitts, District Attorney, and A. H. Van Cott, Deputy District Attorney, for Bespondent.

STEPHENS, P. J.

Luther Glancy was convicted in a justice’s court of disturbing the peace and sentenced to the county jail for six months. While confined therein, and before the expiration of ninety days, the maximum legal imprisonment for such offense, he petitions, through his attorney, in *habeas corpus*to be released on the ground that the judgment is void. But the judgment is not void and *habeas cor pics*will not assist him until the legal time has been served. *(In re Morck,*180 Cal. 384 [181 Pac. 657]; *In re Rosencrantz,*205 Cal. 534 [271 Pac. 902], and Id.,211 Cal. 749 [297 Pac. 15].) Counsel for petitioner argues that the cited cases arose from judgments under the indeterminate sentence law. He also argues that no intendments arise from judgments of justice courts. We think these points make no difference in the problem.

The written direction of the justice to the sheriff states that Glancy is to be confined in the county jail until the fine named in the judgment is paid. Since no fine is mentioned in the judgment, this may be regarded as a nullity.

Writ discharged and the prisoner remanded.

Craig, J., and Desmond, J., concurred.
12:00 P.M.

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

April Crop Production

Executive Summary

Lance Honig, Chief

Crops Branch

April 11, 2017
USDA-NASS

4-11-17

Field Crops Fruit & Nuts Specialty Crops

Citrus

Contents
USDA-NASS

4-11-17

Objective Surveys

(Size and Drop)

Fruit Maturity Row Count

Survey Type Field Observations Laboratory Tests Field Observations

Crops Included Late Oranges Late Oranges Oranges

Grapefruit

Royal and Honey 

Tangerines

Tangelos

Sample Size 697 Groves 146 Samples 90,434 Rows

Collection 

Period

March 20-24 March 29-30 March 29-30

Testing Period March 31

Survey Overview

Florida Citrus
USDA-NASS

4-11-17

April 2017 Crop Production

% Change % Change

From From

Crop Unit April Previous Previous

2017 Forecast Season 

Production

Oranges Mil Tons 5.11 -1.0 -16.0

Grapefruit Thou Tons 685 -9.2 -14.7

Lemons Thou Tons 828 -3.9 -8.6

Tangerines & 

Mandarins Thou Tons 958 -3.2 +0.9
USDA-NASS

4-11-17

Release Date Report Title

April 21 Cattle on Feed

April 27 Agricultural Prices

May 1

CAIR: Cotton System

CAIR: Fats & Oils

CAIR: Flour Millings

CAIR: Grain Crushings

May 10 Cotton Ginnings - Annual

Crop Production

Upcoming Reports
United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

202-720-2127

800-727-9540

nass@nass.usda.gov
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6**  **143**

STEVE LESTER , P laintiff

- Appellant ,

v. KAREN C. RATIGAN, Assistant Attorney General , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 4:11

- cv - 0 2995

- TMC )

Submitted : April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Steven Lester , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Steve Lester appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) co mplaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. A. § 636(b)(1)(B) ( West 200 6 & Supp. 2011 ). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised

Lester that failure to timely file specific objection s to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of tha t recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Lester has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not a id the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### Commonwealth v. Stella

*John Ryan,*for Commonwealth.

*Edwin P. Smith,*for defendant.

November 14, 1978

AVRIGIAN, J.,

On February 10, 1978, complainant brought this action charging defendant with failure to support a minor child of which he is alleged to be the father, in violation of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code of December 6, 1972, P.L. 1482, 18 C.P.S.A. §4322. Defendant denied paternity and requested a jury trial. Defendant also filed a petition for a blood grouping test. On April 4, 1978, The Honorable Horace H. *626Davenport ordered a blood grouping study. Defendant filed his petition for discharge under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100 on August 14, 1978. Defendant on a hearing before this court on his petition, filed in open court on November 3, 1978, an affidavit of counsel stating that complainant under advice of her counsel did not appear for the ordered blood grouping test.

The issue before this court is whether Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100 applies to the Pennsylvania Crimes Code section 4322. Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100 applies only to a “court case,” which is defined by Pa.R.Crim.P. 3(f) as one which is a misdemeanor, felony or murder. The Pennsylvania Crimes Code section 4322 does not specify the class of offenses within which this offense falls. However, section 106(d) of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code provides: “Any offense declared by law to constitute a crime, without specification of the class thereof, is a misdemeanor of the second degree, if the maximum sentence does not make it a felony under this section.” Therefore, this court is persuaded and so holds that Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100 is applicable to the Pennsylvania Crimes Code section 4322 in the case at bar.

ORDER

And now, November 14, 1978, upon consideration of defendant’s petition and complainant’s answer thereto, and upon a hearing thereon, this court hereby grants defendant’s petition to discharge under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100 and hereby orders that the charges set forth in the above matter be dismissed and defendant be discharged.
# C_2016298EN.01000201.xml

| 18.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 August 2016

(2016/C 298/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1276 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4413 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86640 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4951 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0863 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2812 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,63 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2907 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4753 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3086 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4780 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4529 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7457 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5596 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5160 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 252,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1708 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4825 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4759 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 827,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5172 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,350 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,2019 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,104 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6238 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4678 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,3999 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1276

JPY

Japanese yen

113,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4413

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86640

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4951

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0863

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2812

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,63

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2907

RON

Romanian leu

4,4753

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3086

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4780

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4529

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7457

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5596

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5160

KRW

South Korean won

1 252,95

ZAR

South African rand

15,1708

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4825

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4759

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 827,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5172

PHP

Philippine peso

52,350

RUB

Russian rouble

72,2019

THB

Thai baht

39,104

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6238

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4678

INR

Indian rupee

75,3999

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA).
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                 3,187
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          2,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                             139
<INVENTORY>                                               75
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       5,636
<PP&E>                                                 1,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                           876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         7,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  1,552
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   9
<OTHER-SE>                                             5,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           7,453
<SALES>                                                  431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         431
<CGS>                                                  1,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          8,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (9,425)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (9,425)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (9,425)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (1)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (1)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.6

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


                  KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Eric W. Golden, Bobby G. Jenkins and Barry F.
Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the PANAVISION INC. (the
"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and
on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or
officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any
instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the
Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of
attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable
securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents
this 3rd day of February 2003.



                                            /S/ MARTIN D. PAYSON
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Martin D. Payson