alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO RULE 13a-14(a) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)) ORRULE 15d-14(a) (17 CFR
240.15d-14(a)), PROMULGATED UNDER SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 I, Denis Kessler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SCOR, certify that:  1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SCOR;2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.

The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:  a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.

The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys
auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial
reporting. Date: April 29, 2005 By:
    /s/ Denis KesslerName:
Denis KesslerTitle:
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer) E-16
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Novatel Wireless, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-145482, 333-139730, and 333-53692) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-114116, 333-112857, 333-109321, 333-81190, and 333-100633) on Form S-3of Novatel Wireless, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Novatel Wireless, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows, and the related financial statement Schedule II, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008, annual report on Form 10-K of Novatel Wireless, Inc. 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company adopted the disclosure provision of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, *Fair ValueMeasurements*, in 2008, and changed its method of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in 2007 due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—anInterpretation of FASB Statement 109*. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 15, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,809
<PP&E>                                           8,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,243
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,073
<SALES>                                         83,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,366
<CGS>                                           38,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,121
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,651
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,091
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       560
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14<F1><F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13<F1><F2>
<FN>
<F1>BASIC EPS BEFORE THE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM WAS $0.41. DILUTED EPS BEFORE THE
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM WAS $0.38.
<F2>EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED
EPS HAVE BEEN ENTERED INTO THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EPS LINE ITEMS ABOVE.
</FN>


</TABLE>
No. 2,520.

#### PEOPLE *ex. rel.*SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant, *v.*COUNTY JUDGE, Respondent.

Oebtiobabi. — "Weit -op-. — The writ of certiorari, is a writ of review, and can only issue for the purpose of reviewing *final*determinations and adjudications of inferior tribunals, boards, or officers exercising judicial functions, when there is no appeal, nor any plain, speedy, or adequate remedy.

Idem. — The petitioner for a writ of certiorari has no right to use, nor a necessity for using the name of the people in serving out the writ in order to obtain redress for private wrongs.

The case is stated in the opinion.

*Jos. M. Nouges,*for Appellants.

*W. H. Patterson,*for Bespondent.

Bhodes, C. J.

delivered the-opinion -of the Court, Temple, J., Wallaoe, J., and Cbockett, J., concurring;

'The Commissioners appointed in pursuance of the Act of April 4, 1864 (Stats. 1863-4, p. 352), in the proceedings *480for tbe extension of Montgomery and Connecticut streets, presented to tbe County Judge their written application, requesting that be should determine tbe compensation to be paid to *them,*for their services as such Commissioners, and tbe amount to be paid for services of counsel, etc., as provided by tbe Act of March 4, 1870 (Stats. "1869-70, p. 146). Tbe County Judge thereupon designated tbe time and place for tbe bearing of tbe application. At this stage of tbe proceedings, tbe writ of certiorari was issued to tbe County Judge.

Tbe position taken by tbe petitioner is, that *the*Act of 1870 is unconstitutional; and, indeed, tbe real purpose of tbe action is to obtain a judicial determination of that question. Tbe question cannot be entertained, while tbe proceedings before tbe County Judge remain in their present condition. Tbe writ of certiorari is a writ of review. Its office is to bring up for review *final*determinations and adjudications of inferior tribunals, boards or officers exercising judicial functions, when there is no appeal, nor any plain, speedy and adequate remedy. Tbe writ is necessarily founded on a final determination. Were tbe rule otherwise, a writ might issue at any step in tbe proceedings of tbe inferior tribunal, and thus withdraw *the*case from tbe consideration of tbe inferior tribunal, although such tribunal might, were tbe point presented, decide that it bad no jurisdiction in tbe matter submitted to it. This would be tbe exercise of original jurisdiction by tbe Court issuing tbe writ, and not a review of tbe determination of tbe inferior tribunal. Tbe matter complained of would be, not that tbe tribunal bad exceeded, but that it was about to exceed, its jurisdiction. *(Wilson*v. *Sacramento,*3 Cal. 386 ; *Lynde*v. *Noble,*20 John. 80 ; *Noble*v. *Board of Pilots,*37 Barb. 126 ; *Devlin v. Platt,*20 How. Pr. 167 ; Bac. Abridg. Title Certiorari.)

Tbe action is improperly entitled. Tbe petitioner has no right to use, nor necessity for using tbe name of tbe People, in suing out tbe writ. (People v. *Pacheco,*29 Cal. 210.)

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT        32**

**Certificate      Of Chief Executive Officer And Acting Chief Financial      Officer**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.      1350)**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Michael                A. Grollman                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                |   |   |        |
| Michael                  A. GrollmanChairman,                    Chief Executive Officer,and                    Acting Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |
08 July 2010 

BEFORE THE 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Docket No.: DOT-OST-2010-0140 

Request by the Association of European Airlines (AEA) for a 90-day extension of the 

comment period 

On June 8, 2010, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued the Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, “Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections,” (NPRM) which 

seeks to expand upon the published Final Rule under the same title (DOT-OST-2007-

0022). 

The aviation industry is and remains committed to providing exemplary service to its 

passengers and believes cooperation between carriers and governments can result in 

valuable improvements in the global aviation system. However, the AEA believes that 

regulations in this area can lead to extensive unintended consequences, which could 

reduce service to passengers and adversely impact an industry pivotal to the global 

economy. 

The NPRM provides until August 9, 2010, 60 days from publication, for the public to 

comment on this Proposal. AEA respectfully requests an additional 90 days to submit 

comments regarding the NPRM, citing the following factors: 

The NPRM seeks to impose on US and foreign carriers significant and new regulatory 

burdens, which the industry must adequately analyze in order to provide 

comprehensive and useful comments to the DOT. As the regulation would touch 

almost all aspects of an airline’s business, AEA members need to consult with multiple 

offices on the cost, timing, feasibility and potential unintended consequences of the 

proposal. Sixty days is not a sufficient time period in which to collect the extensive 

amounts of data and information from all affected parties necessary to evaluate this 

Proposal. 

For these reasons, AEA requests an additional 90 days to collect the aforementioned 

essential information to provide valuable comments on the NPRM. 

Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request. 

Yours sincerely, 

Ulrich Schulte-Strathaus
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                  KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Glenn P. Dickes, Joseph P. Page, Scott L.
Seybold and Barry F. Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and
in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
PANAVISION INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form
10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the
undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to
the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in
connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents
thiS 22nd day of March, 2000.

                                            /S/ MARTIN D. PAYSON
                                            --------------------
                                            MARTIN D. PAYSON
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acrongenomics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Platon Tzouvalis, the President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:  June 4, 2007

 

/s/ Platon Tzouvalis                                  

Platon Tzouvalis

President

(Principal Executive Officer)
Order entered May 9, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00040

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF B.P. AND S.P., CHILDREN
On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

D allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 20

- 04783

O RDER

We REINSTATE this appeal. As directed by this Court, the trial court conducted a hearing and signed an order on appellant’s Rule 306a motion finding that appellant or his counsel first
either re ceived notice or acquired actual knowledge of the judgment on November 19, 2021. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 306a (5); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.2(c). In light of the trial
court’ s finding
, appellant’s notice of appeal filed on December 10, 2021 was timely. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his notice of appeal as moot

. Because the clerk’s and reporter’s record s have been filed, appellant shall
file his brief on the merits within thirty days of the date of this order.
/s/ KEN MOLBE RG JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                      CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, a
corporation incorporated in Ireland (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

         The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 23, 2003                        /s/ JOHN O'DONOVAN
                                            ____________________________________
                                            Name: John O'Donovan
                                            Title: Group Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) as an exhibit to the Report.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFPERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

The undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial conditions and results of operations of  Summus,Inc. (USA).

 

| Date:      November 14, 2002 |  /s/ Bjorn D. Jawerth                                             Bjorn D. JawerthChief Executive Officer |
|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549








FORM 8-K


CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 2, 2012


MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware01-1369752-1604305(State or OtherJurisdiction ofIncorporation)(Commission FileNumber)(IRS EmployerIdentification No.)


160 South Industrial Blvd., Calhoun, Georgia30701(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (706) 629-7721





(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


 ̈ Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act CFR 240.14d-2(b))


 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act CFR 240.17R 240.13e-4(c))





---







Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.


The following information, including the Exhibit attached hereto, is being furnished pursuant to this Item 2.02 and shall not be deemed “filed” for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.


On August 2, 2012, Mohawk Industries, Inc., issued a press release announcing its second quarter financial results. A copy of the press release is attached hereto and hereby incorporated by reference as Exhibit 99.1.


Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.


(d) Exhibits


99.1 Press release dated August 2, 2012.








---













SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Mohawk Industries, Inc.Date: August 2, 2012By:/s/ James F. BrunkJames F. BrunkV.P. & Corporate Controller








---













INDEX TO EXHIBITS





Exhibit99.1.Press release dated August 2, 2012.