alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Abatement Order filed December 8, 2016

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00041-CV

____________

JIM RICHARDSON, RICHARDSON OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. 

AND ACTION DISPLAY, INC., Appellants

V.

MH OUTDOOR MEDIA, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 11th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-57897

ABATEMENT ORDER

Notice was filed on December 5, 2016, that appellants have filed voluntary

petitions for bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of 

Alabama on December 2, 2016. According to the notice, the bankruptcy cases are:

 Case No. 16-41970-JJR7; In re Action Displays, Inc.

 Case No. 16-41971-JJR7; In re Richardson Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

 Case No. 16-41972-JJR7; In re Jimmy Earl Richardson
2

A bankruptcy suspends the appeal from the date when the bankruptcy petition 

is filed until the appellate court reinstates the appeal in accordance with federal law. 

Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal abated.

When a case has been suspended by a bankruptcy filing, a party may move 

the appellate court to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the 

bankruptcy court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. If the bankruptcy court has lifted or terminated 

the stay, a certified copy of the order must be attached to the motion. Id. A party 

filing a motion to reinstate shall specify what further action, if any, is required from 

this court when the appeal is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a).

For administrative purposes only, and without surrendering jurisdiction, the 

appeal is abated and treated as a closed case until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM
Stratification of Rhode Island

1989

Land Use Strata

>25% Cultivated

Agri-Urban: >100 homes/sq. mi.

Commercial: >100 homes/sq. mi.

<25% Cultivated

Non-Agricultural

Water

Unprojected, Geographic Coordinates Prepared by Geospatial Science and Survey Section, 2014
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
TCI Satellite Entertainment, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-18165 and 333-18167) on Form S-8 of TCI Satellite Entertainment, Inc.
(as defined in note 1 to the financial statements) of our report dated March 6,
1998, relating to the balance sheets of TCI Satellite Entertainment, Inc. as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related statements of operations, equity,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1997, and all related schedules, which report appears in the December 31,
1997 annual report on Form 10-K of TCI Satellite Entertainment, Inc.


                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 30, 1998
Exhibit 10.24

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

RIVERVIEW NATIONAL BANK

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT

DATED JUNE 30, 2010

FOR

KIRK FOX

 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is entered into this 4th day of January, 2013, by and between Riverview National Bank, located in Marysville, Pennsylvania (the “Bank”), and Kirk Fox (the “Executive”).

 

The Bank and the Executive are parties to an Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement dated June 30, 2010, as subsequently amended (the “Agreement”). The Bank and Executive now wish to amend the Agreement to provide for discretionary contributions to the Deferral Account to be made by the Bank.

 

Now, therefore, the Bank and the Executive agree as follows.

 

Section 1.0 shall be added to the Agreement immediately before Section 1.1:

 

1.0 “Bank Contribution” means any discretionary contribution the Bank makes to the Deferral Account as described in Section 2.5.

 

Section 2.5 shall be added to the Agreement immediately following Section 2.4:

 

2.5       Bank Contributions. In addition to any Deferrals, the Bank may, at any time, make a Bank Contribution to the Deferral Account. Any Bank Contribution may, at the election of the Bank, be subject to a vesting schedule or such other provisions as the Bank may provide.

 

Section 3.1(a) of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following:

 

(a) Any Deferrals and Bank Contributions hereunder;

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a representative of the Bank have executed this Second Amendment as indicated below:

 

	
Executive:
    	
 
    	
Bank:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Kirk D. Fox
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Theresa M. Wasko
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Its:  CFO
#### Louis V. D. Hardenburgh and another, Appl’ts, *v.*Jacob Schmidt, Resp’t.

*(City Court of Brooklyn, General Term,*

*Filed September*27, 1886).

YeNDOR AND VENDEE — SALE AND DELIVERY, WHAT CONSTITUTES.

Where the vendor takes back goods to be replaced by others, the sale and delivery of said goods is rescinded by consent, and no action will lie upon that transaction. If the goods are taken back to make them perfect, the previous acceptance by the vendee is waived. In neither case can the vendor recover for goods sold and delivered.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant on verdict directed by the judge at trial term;

tr. *M. Stafford,*for appl’ts *; Abel Groolc,*for resp’t.

REYNOLDS, J.

This action is brought for the sale and delivery of a parlor carpet. The answer admits the sale and delivery of the carpet, but sets up a warranty and a breach thereof. It also alleges a surrender and return of the property, and an acceptance thereof by the plaintiffs.

On the trial the defendant made a point under the statute of frauds, but on the pleadings and testimony nd such question arises.

If the case had depended upon the question of warranty, it would have been the duty of the judge to submit it to the jury. But it appears that after the carpet was laid, and while the defendant was complaining of its alleged defects, the plaintiffs took it up and removed it to their store, and it has never since been returned or tendered to the defendant. Just previous to such removal, defendant’s wife had written to plaintiffs requesting them to take away the carpet,saying she would call and select *845another in place of it. Sbe did call for that purpose, but plaintiffs refused to put down another unless she would first examine every yard of it, which she declined to do, and no other carpet was ever selected. -Plaintiff King says he agreed to take the carpet up, take out one breadth, which had a hole in it, put in a new one, and re-lay it, and make it a perfect carpet — -and that it was taken up for that purpose. In either case we do not see how the plaintiffs can recover. If the carpet was taken back, to be replaced by another, the sale and delivery were rescinded by consent of the parties, so that no action will lie upon that transaction — if it was taken back for the purpose stated by plaintiff, any previous acceptance of the carpet by defendant was thereby waived, and the plaintiffs were put back where they were before the delivery. They have never carried out the agreement; no new breadth has been put in, and no offer of the carpet to defendant has since been made. They are not therefore in a position to recover as for goods sold and delivered.

Our conclusion is that the trial judge was right in directing a verdict for defendant, and there should be a judgment in his favor with costs, including the costs of the appeal.

VAN Wyck:, J., concurs.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-31116 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus CHARLES D. MATTINGLY, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-50011
- - - - - - - - - - July 30, 1996 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Charles D. Mattingly, Jr., appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Mattingly argues that the district court erred in calculating the amount of loss under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(1) and in awarding a two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice under § 3C1.1.No. 95-31116 -2- The district court did not err in determining that the intended loss exceeded $10,000. See United States v. Henderson , 19 F.3d 917, 927-28 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 207 (1994); U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1, comment. (n.7). The district court did not clearly err in awarding a two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice. See U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, comment. (n.3(c)). AFFIRMED.
#### CITY OF NEWARK *ET AL.,*RESPONDENTS, v. NATURAL RESOURCE COUNCIL IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION *ET AL.,*APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

On remand from the Supreme Court of New Jersey by order of July 27, 1977

Decided August 25, 1977.

*459Before Judges Carton, Kole and Larner.

*Mr. William, F. Hyland,*Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for appellants, Natural Resource Council in the Department of Environmental Protection, *et al. (Mr. Stephen Skillman,*Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; *Mr. Mor-ion Goldfein,*Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

*Mr. John li. Weigel,*attorney for respondents City of Newark, *et al.*

*Messrs. Gladstone, Hart, Manáis, Rathe & Shedd,*attorneys for respondent Bergen County Associates *(Mr. Marvin II. Gladstone,*of counsel and on the brief).

*Mr, Alfred A. Porro,*attorney for respondent Borough of East Rutherford.

*Mr. William, J. Ward*filed statement in lieu of brief on behalf of New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority.

Per Curiam.

On March 29, 1977 we rendered a *per curiam*opinion in this case. 148 *N. J. Super.*297. On July 27, 1977 the Supreme Court ordered that a petition for certification be granted and remanded the matter summarily to us for clarification of that portion of our opinion dealing with a trial court’s order of October 15, 1975.

We supplement our opinion of March 29, 1977 pursuant to such remand by modifying the last two paragraphs of that opinion (at 299) to read as follows:1

*460We note the provision of the order of October 15, 1975 to the effect that in the event of noncompliance by the state agency with the March 6, 1975 order “ fin connection with the grant overlay to be promulgated by the Natural Resource Council * * * all prior riparian grants and quit claim deeds issued by the State shall be deemed valid and sufficient instruments to cut off and extinguish all right, claim, title and interest of the State of New Jersey in and to the lands conveyed thereby.’ ” We assume that this provision applies only to prior grants and quitclaim deeds of lands within the hatched area. *Nothing herein is intended to in any way relieve the*State, *through the Natural Resource*Council, *of the duty imposed by the trial court of preparing and publishing an overlay for each map depicting which ripan-ia/n, grants the State recognizes as valid. This requirement applies to both the hatched and unhatched areas.*

Affirmed.

1

The added portion is italicized.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2815 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to provide for the continued 

implementation on a permanent basis of the Part D Senior Savings model. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to provide 

for the continued implementation on a permanent basis 

of the Part D Senior Savings model. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seniors Saving on In5 sulin Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUATION OF PART D SENIOR SAVINGS 

7 MODEL. 

8 Section 1115A of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 1315a) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

10 subsection: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2815 IS

1 ‘‘(h) PART D SENIOR SAVINGS MODEL.—Notwith2 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary shall 

3 provide for the continued implementation on a permanent 

4 basis of the Part D Senior Savings Model under this sec5 tion, under the same parameters under which such model 

6 was implemented for plan year 2021.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors
                         -------------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-18485) pertaining to the Covance Inc. Employee Equity Participation
Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-18487) pertaining to The
Stock Purchase Plan of Covance Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-18493) pertaining to the Covance Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-29467) pertaining to the Covance Inc.
Conversion Equity Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-33185)
pertaining to the Covance Inc. Restricted Share Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-36469) pertaining to the Covance Inc. Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90777)
pertaining to the Covance Inc. Deferred Stock Unit Plan for Non-Employee Members
of the Board of Directors, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-90779) pertaining to the Covance Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90781) pertaining to the
Covance Inc. Director's Restricted Stock Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-36586) pertaining to the Covance Inc. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan and the Covance Inc. 2000 Employee Equity Participation Plan, in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-97433) pertaining to the 2002 Employee
Equity Participation Plan and the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan, and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-83712) pertaining to the Stock Purchase
Savings Plan, of our report dated January 17, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Covance Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                -------------------------------


MetroPark, New Jersey
March 5, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1



Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm



Board of Directors

NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.



We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statements (File Nos. 333-110189, 333-109778 and 333-173673) of our
report dated April 16, 2012 relating to the consolidated financial statements of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2011, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|/s/ Kingery & Crouse, P.A.  
|----------------------------
|Certified Public Accountants
|Tampa, Florida              
|April 16, 2012
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re: William W. Frey

No. 06-16-00208-CR

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED DECEMBER 7, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Bureau of Labor Statistics

The Bureau of Labor Statistics Technical Advisory Committee will meet on Friday, May 15, 2015. The meeting will be held in the Postal Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC.

The Committee provides advice and makes recommendations to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on technical aspects of the collection and formulation of economic measures. The BLS presents issues and then draws on the expertise of Committee members representing specialized fields within the academic disciplines of economics, statistics and survey design.

The meeting will be held in rooms 1-3 of the Postal Square Building Conference Center. The schedule and agenda for the meeting are as follows:

8:30 a.m. Commissioner's welcome and review of agency developments

9:00 a.m. Current Employment Statistics (CES) Survey Review of Benchmarking Methodology and Goals

11:15 a.m. Updates on topics from past committee meetings

1:30 p.m. Discussion of future priorities

2:00 p.m. Using Form 5500 Series Data to Improve BLS Data on Employee Benefits

4:00 p.m. Approximate conclusion

The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the meeting should be directed to Sarah Dale, Bureau of Labor Statistics Technical Advisory Committee, on 202-691-5643. Individuals who require special accommodations should contact Ms. Dale at least two days prior to the meeting date.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of April 2015.

Kimberly D. Hill,

Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

[FR Doc. 2015-07822 Filed 4-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 66 (Tuesday, April 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 1, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Farmers National Banc Corp, Canfield, Ohio; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of National Bancshares Corp, Orrville, 
Ohio and thereby indirectly acquire First National Bank, Orrville, 
Ohio.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. American Commerce Bancshares, Inc., Breman, Georgia; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of ProBank, Tallahassee, Florida.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Inter-Mountain Bancorp, Inc., Bozeman, Montana; to merge with 
Teton Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Teton Banks, 
both in Fairfield, Montana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 2, 2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-07901 Filed 4-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 6210-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 65 (Monday, April 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
renewal of the RTCA Charter (FAA Order 1110.77V) for two years, 
effective April 1, 2015. The administrator is the sponsor of the 
committee. The FAA and seven other government agencies use RTCA as a 
federal advisory committee. On January 2, 1976, the FAA, the major 
government user of RTCA products, assumed sponsorship on behalf of all 
government agencies. RTCA brings together representatives of the 
government and industry to form special committees and steering 
committees to provide advice and recommendations on key operational and 
technological issues that impact the Next Generation Air Transportation 
System (NextGen) implementation and the Air Traffic Management System. 
The Secretary of Transportation has determined that that information 
and use of committee are necessary in the public interest in connection 
with the performance of duties imposed on the FAA by law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Steering Committee and Special Committee 
meetings are open to the public and announced in the Federal Register, 
except as authorized by Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 1, 2015.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, Program Oversight and Administration, ANG-A15, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-07854 Filed 4-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P