alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection
with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Holli C. Nichols,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)
the Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
 applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
 the dates and for the periods indicated.  Date:
 November 6, 2008
By:
/s/ HOLLI C. NICHOLSHolli C. NicholsExecutive Vice President and Chief
 Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TINA TEDESCO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 274 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3593 

AN ACT 

To amend the United States International Broadcasting Act 

of 1994 to extend by one year the operation of Radio 

Free Asia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3593 EH

1 SECTION 1. ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF OPERATION OF 

2 RADIO FREE ASIA. 

3 Section 309(f) of the United States International 

4 Broadcasting Act of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6208(f)) is amended 

5 by striking ‘‘2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3593 

AN ACT 

To amend the United States International Broadposes. operation of Radio Free Asia, and for other pur- casting Act of 1994 to extend by one year the
EXHIBIT 32







AMASYS CORPORATION





Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of  Amasys Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge and belief that:





(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








September 23, 2011/s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.President, Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
FABIAN THOMPSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1278

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Linda F. McCallum , Judge

.

Fabian Thompson , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFF IRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
### RDCeal O0.)Z-H-0QZZfl-££ ( AlWi iAA Ij
c^ftf^pcns^ to PtrVtehS bEjpt CDTY^ r^uD V^m* C^FP*iQ<ft264. fij^amlto-Sf, And FILED IN COURT OFAPPEALS

12th Court ofAppeals District 

# MAR-620!^^L TVlER TEXAS CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

cvPbrfoe n'\tt\n\\ P(\l\t\{\\.. Ihf Jute, asscss?t Ibrvwyw Pfr ^ 

### jr. [^^rrR^v^p 77^2aK) ..E^ll^WCifi/fri USKCF frl vyv\>1 -toO- 4h& Pw**\ aHtfiraj h\fd Pnoyy\F(^ niiti ^ h& hFh^lP ^y) PkhCi> -to*)- ^riMtor* •HE. \^lKLerpJr^DJZ2i^ 2fli4 ,1hF toques fcEOStf LCflsta- rvwfc Ptoai&b/F-k ABDRianK<fec\Unp feiL4he- £&Ui*oiYY\ K?fcor\S'. p\\ flTOFim-Ts tern Dcrvfri pkcgss -to fh^ la,^ ii'ttce^u e& -tfv^ 

## ^Vsm*** K2& Umfted hnnojfdotd -+ne fouc&arvl Tfrv\\ tote tooto

Q AWRtvW AFftfe rv\WF -fimt- -to H^aKh <vr^ afcrwta^ wl QUhfl^W 

## rg:. 3£ 

## trtft'li , & c^iUfNR fw^^^i) cv^on tofrlE hft.Wiffrftgfoponss u» nr^-lfW

### prA Trefoil urrJFii VmaiAl rfvhuuQ.\J #«/- JhF Mm'no
/5ClO f l^rfrtao Id 

### DflAW5/7y 7S2AI
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Lexent Inc. (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Norman Fornella, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |     |                       
| | --- | ----------------------
| | By: | /s/ NORMAN G. FORNELLA

| |                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | ______________________________________ 
     Norman G. Fornella
| | Chief Financial Officer                                        

Date: May 2, 2003

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Lexent Inc.
and will be retained by Lexent Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Sinclair v. Women’s Health Services, Inc.

On May 6,1977, plaintiffs filed with the administrator a complaint against defendant, Women’s Health Services, Inc. On June 27,1977, the administrator received defendant’s preliminary ob*640jections in the nature of a petition raising question of jurisdiction. On July 11, 1977, the administrator received plaintiffs’ answer to defendant’s preliminary objections.

As stated by both parties in briefs submitted in support of their respective positions, the sole question raised is whether Women’s Health Services, Inc., is a “health care provider” within the meaning of the Health Care Services Malpractice Act, 40 P.S. §1301.101 etseq. (hereinafterthe act). Section 103 of the act (40 P.S. §1301.103) defines “health care provider” as:

> “[A] primary health center or a person, corporation, facility, institution or other entity licensed or approved by the Commonwealth to provide health care or professional medical services as a physician, an osteopathic physician or surgeon, a podiatrist, hospital, nursing home, . . .”

To qualify as a “health care provider” under the act, defendant must be either a primary health center, or a corporation licensed or approved by the Commonwealth to provide health care or professional medical services as a physician, an osteopathic physician or surgeon, a podiatrist, hospital or nursing home. Defendant has not been licensed or approved by the Commonwealth to provide health care or professional medical services as a physician, osteopathic physician or surgeon, podiatrist, hospital, nursing home or primary health center; and plaintiffs make no allegations to the contrary. The office of the administrator has also checked with the respective licensing boards and departments of the Commonwealth to determine independently if defendant has been so licensed or approved by the Commonwealth, and has been informed that defendant has only a provi*641sional certificate as an abortion clinic. Abortion clinics are not included within the definition of “health care provider” contained in the act.

Therefore, we find that defendant herein has not been licensed or approved by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in any of the six categories of “health care provider” upon which the act confers jurisdiction on the arbitration panel system, and therefore we issue the following

ORDER

And now, August 15, 1977, upon consideration of defendant’s preliminary objections, plaintiffs’ answer to defendant’s preliminary objections, and the briefs submitted by the respective parties, it is hereby ordered and decreed that defendant’s preliminary objections are sustained, and plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed because the Arbitration Panels for Health Care, pursuant to the Health Care Services Malpractice Act, 40 P.S. §1301.101 et seq., do not have jurisdiction to hear and decide plaintiffs’ claims because defendant is not a “health care provider” within the terms of the act.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION VII

901 NORTH 5TH STREET

KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101

OCI 'i. 7 2010

Mr. James Kavanaugh

Director

Missouri Department of Natural Resources

Air Pollution Control Program

P.O. Box 176

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102-0176

Dear Mr. Kavanaugh:

OFFICE OF

REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

I am pleased to approve the 2010 Missouri Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Plan and

Five-year Air Monitoring Network Assessment submitted to EPA R7 by the Missouri

Department ofNatural Resources on June 28, 2010. The plans were reviewed and found to be in

accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 58.

Your air monitoring staff is to be commended for its hard work and attention to detail

while completing these plans. Your actions and dedication directly support the EPA's strategic

air quality goals by maintaining a well designed monitoring network.

Sincer.. elY' "

''Ie'

Karl Brooks

Regional Administrator

cc: Ronald Hammerschmidt, ENSV

RECYCLE~ PIlPER CONTAINS RECYCLED AllERS
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
> 
> (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
> 
> (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.

|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                            
|------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | General Partner                                                      
|       |                                                                      
|       | /S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________                  
|       |                                                                      
|Name:  | Kelly Tucek                                                          
|Title: | Vice President of the General Partner and                            
|       | principal financial officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.
|Date:  | May 10, 2005
Ex. 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
        PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of section 1350
of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United  States  Code,  as adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of
EduLink, Inc. ("EduLink"),  that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of EduLink
on Form 10-K for the period ended  December 31, 2003,  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the  information  contained  in such report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operation of EduLink.  This
written  statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
as an exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signed  original of this  statement  has been
provided  to EduLink  and will be  retained  by  EduLink  and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


   Date: November 1, 2006                     By:  /s/ Aleksandr Shvarts
                                              ---------------------------

                                              ALEKSANDR SHVARTS
                                              Chief Executive Officer

   Date: November 1, 2006                     By:  /s/ Gennady Pomeranets
                                              ----------------------------

                                              GENNADY POMERANETS, CPA

                                              Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14
PROMULGATED UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted.](c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ William P. MoffittWilliam P. MoffittPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### Keystone Pipe and Supply Co. v. Central Pipe and Supply Co.

*Foreign attachment*— Quashing *writ*— Partnership—Failure *to name*members *of firm*— Amendment—Act *of May U, 1852.*

1. A writ of foreign attachment against a partnership will not be quashed because of the failure to name the members of the firm as parties defendant.

2. In such a case an amendment will be allowed under the Act of May 4, 1852, P. L. 574, so as to include the names of the partners.

Rule to quash writ of foreign attachment. C. P. Butler Co., Dec. T., 1920, No. 53.

*John Hutchinson,*for plaintiff; *John R. Henninger,*for defendant.

July 15, 1921.

Reibek, P. J.,

This cause is before us on motion on the part of defendant company to quash the writ and proceedings in the case because the affidavit showing cause of action is defective and the money was attached as the property of the defendant company, a partnership, and does not include the names of the individuals composing the partnership.

The respondent contends that there should be a general appearance for the defendant rather than an appearance *de bene esse*before the court takes cognizance of the matter in controversy.

While there is apparently not a universal practice throughout the courts of the State in relation to such appearance, dependent somewhat on the local court rule, yet such appearance must be recognized under the rule as stated in Turner *v.*Larkin, 12 Pa. Superior Ct. 284, 290, “that a party may appear specially for the purpose of stating an objection without thereby waiving it.”

The question primarily for our consideration relates to allowance of a petition for amendment by the plaintiff, as the same cures the defect raised by defendant. Under the Act of May 4, 1852, P. L. 574, “the court shall have power in any stage of the proceedings to permit amendments by changing or *60adding the name or names of any party, plaintiff or defendant, whenever it shall appear to them that a mistake or omission has been made in the name or names of any such party.”

Inasmuch as the amendment does not change the defendant or bring new parties into court, but only names the partners as constituting the partnership, under these circumstances, in our opinion, it should be allowed and the motion to quash the writ must be refused.

And now, July 15, 1921, rule to show cause why the writ and proceedings in this case should not be quashed discharged, at costs of defendant.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3056019-OCT-201010:40 AM
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATEOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF**

**VYYOINC.**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VyyoInc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Davidi Gilo, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Arik Levi, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of his knowledge, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Davidi Gilo         |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Davidi Gilo             |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| May 12, 2006            |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Arik Levi           |   |
| Arik Levi               |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May 12, 2006            |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         272,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,653,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                   170,000
<INVENTORY>                                    977,896
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,504,655
<PP&E>                                       2,201,010
<DEPRECIATION>                                 315,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,401,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,749,154
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,825
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,346,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,401,141
<SALES>                                      5,487,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,898,211
<CGS>                                        2,477,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,629,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,012,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               227,206
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,745,866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,745,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,745,866)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# New Jersey National Guard Partners with Republic of Cyprus

/ Published Oct. 27, 2022

TRENTON, N.J. – The New Jersey National Guard has been selected as the new state partner for the Republic of Cyprus, the third-largest island in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. 

Through the Department of Defense National Guard Bureau State Partnership Program, National Guard units throughout the United States conduct military-to-military engagements, guided by State Department foreign policy goals, and develop person-to-person ties with their partners.

"Global partnerships are more important than ever before," said Gov. Philip D. Murphy. "Our New Jersey National Guard service members are tried-and-true leaders on the military and civic fronts. They work hard every day to ensure peace and safety, both at home and abroad, and will bring that same dedication and collective expertise to this partnership."

The Republic of Cyprus is New Jersey's second SPP partner. The New Jersey National Guard recently marked 21 years of partnership with the Republic of Albania.

"I am excited to welcome the Republic of Cyprus to the New Jersey family," said Brig. Gen. Lisa J. Hou, D.O., the adjutant general of New Jersey. "As a longstanding participant in the State Partnership Program, we bring experience and motivation to every engagement, as well as steadfast commitment to the principles of freedom and security."

Celeste Wallander, assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs, met last month with Marios Lysiotis, the Republic of Cyprus's ambassador to the United States, to officially announce that the Republic of Cyprus was paired with the New Jersey National Guard.

This selection demonstrates the growing partnership between the Republic of Cyprus and the United States on maritime security, counterterrorism, and natural disaster and emergency response.

The strategic location of the Republic of Cyprus and its European Union membership and support for Western democratic principles make it an important partner for the United States.

Advocates from more than a dozen U.S. civic, commercial, and academic organizations supported the match between New Jersey and the Republic of Cyprus.

More than 8,300 Citizen-Soldiers and Citizen-Airmen of the New Jersey National Guard serve in many hometown and overseas missions.