Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 66 / Tuesday, April 7, 2015 / Notices 18693 

APPENDIX TO NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF AMERICAN PYROTECHNICS ASSOCIATION (APA) EXEMPTION

FROM THE 14-HOUR HOS RULE DURING 2015 AND 2016 INDEPENDENCE DAY CELEBRATIONS FOR 50 MOTOR CARRIERS—Continued 

Motor carrier Street address City, state, zip code DOT No. 

27 Martin & Ware Inc. dba Pyro City Maine & Central 

Maine Pyrotechnics.

P.O. Box 322 ............................ Hallowell, ME 04347 ................ 734974 

28 Melrose Pyrotechnics, Inc .............................................. 1 Kinsgubury Industrial Park .... Kingsbury, IN 46345 ................. 434586 

29 Precocious Pyrotechnics, Inc ......................................... 4420–278th Ave NW ................ Belgrade, MN 56312 ................ 435931 

30 Pyro Engineering Inc., dba/Bay Fireworks ..................... 400 Broadhollow Rd. Ste #3 .... Farmindale, NY 11735 ............. 530262 

31 Pyro Shows Inc ............................................................... P.O. Box 1776 .......................... LaFollette, TN 37766 ................ 456818 

32 Pyro Spectacluars, Inc .................................................... 3196 N Locust Ave ................... Rialto, CA 92376 ...................... 029329 

33 Pyro Spectaculars North, Inc .......................................... 5301 Lang Avenue ................... McClellan, CA 95652 ............... 1671438 

34 Pyrotechnic Display, Inc ................................................. 8450 W. St. Francis Rd ............ Frankfort, IL 60423 ................... 1929883 

35 Pyrotecnico (S. Vitale Pyrotechnic Industries, Inc.) ....... 302 Wilson Rd .......................... New Castle, PA 16105 ............. 526749 

36 Pyrotecnico, LLC ............................................................ 60 West Ct ............................... Mandeville, LA 70471 ............... 548303 

37 Pyrotecnico FX ............................................................... 6965 Speedway Blvd. Suite 

115.

Las Vegas, NV 89115 .............. 1610728 

38 Rainbow Fireworks, Inc .................................................. 76 Plum Ave ............................. Inman, KS 67546 ..................... 1139643 

39 RES Specialty Pyrotechnics ........................................... 21595 286th St ......................... Belle Plaine, MN 56011 ........... 523981 

40 Rozzi’s Famous Fireworks, Inc ...................................... 11605 North Lebanon Rd ......... Loveland, OH 45140 ................ 0483686 

41 Skyworks, Ltd ................................................................. 13513 W. Carrier Rd ................ Carrier, OK 73727 .................... 1421047 

42 Spielbauer Fireworks Co, Inc ......................................... 220 Roselawn Blvd .................. Green Bay, WI 54301 .............. 046479 

43 Starfire Corporation ........................................................ 682 Cole Road ......................... Carrolltown, PA 15722 ............. 554645 

44 Vermont Fireworks Co., Inc./Northstar Fireworks Co., 

Inc.

2235 Vermont Route 14 South East Montpelier, VT 05651 ...... 310632 

45 Western Display Fireworks, Ltd ...................................... 10946 S. New Era Rd .............. Canby, OR 97013 .................... 498941 

46 Western Enterprises, Inc ................................................ P.O. Box 160 ............................ Carrier, OK 73727 .................... 203517 

47 Western Fireworks, Inc ................................................... 14592 Ottaway Road NE ......... Aurora, OR 97002 .................... 838585 

48 Wolverine Fireworks Display, Inc ................................... 205 W Seidlers ......................... Kawkawlin, MI .......................... 376857 

49 Young Explosives Corp. ................................................. P.O. Box 18653 ........................ Rochester, NY 14618 ............... 450304 

50 Zambelli Fireworks MFG, Co., Inc .................................. P.O. Box 1463 .......................... New Castle, PA 16103 ............. 033167 

APPENDIX TO NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF AMERICAN PYROTECHNICS ASSOCIATION EXEMPTION FROM THE

14-HOUR HOS RULE DURING 2015 AND 2016 INDEPENDENCE DAY CELEBRATIONS FOR 5 MOTOR CARRIERS NOT

PREVIOUSLY EXEMPTED

Motor carrier Street address City, state, zip code DOT No. 

1 Pyro Shows of Texas, Inc ..................... 6601 9 Mile Azle Rd ............................. Fort Worth, TX 76135 ........................... 2432196 

2 Sorgi American Fireworks Michigan, 

LLC.

935 Wales Ridge Rd ............................. Wales, MI 48027 ................................... 2475727 

3 Spirit of 76 ............................................. 6401 West Hwy 40 ................................ Columbia, MO 65202 ............................ 2138948 

4 USA Halloween Planet Inc. dba USA 

Fireworks.

7800 Record Street, Suite A ................. Indianapolis, IN 46226 .......................... 725457 

5 Arthur Rozzi Pyrotechnics ..................... 6607 Red Hawk Ct ................................ Maineville, OH 45039 ............................ 2008107 

[FR Doc. 2015–07906 Filed 4–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE CODE 4910–EX–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. FMCSA–2014–0300] 

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption 

Applications; Vision 

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration (FMCSA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of final disposition. 

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its 

decision to exempt 51 individuals from 

the vision requirement in the Federal 

Motor Carrier Safety Regulations 

(FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the 

vision requirement in one eye for 

various reasons. The exemptions will 

enable these individuals to operate 

commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in 

interstate commerce without meeting 

the prescribed vision requirement in 

one eye. The Agency has concluded that 

granting these exemptions will provide 

a level of safety that is equivalent to or 

greater than the level of safety 

maintained without the exemptions for 

these CMV drivers. 

DATES: The exemptions were granted 

February 18, 2015. The exemptions 

expire on February 18, 2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles A. Horan, III, Director, Carrier, 

Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards, 

(202) 366–4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, 

FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room 

W64–224, Washington, DC 20590–0001. 

Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. If you have questions 

on viewing or submitting material to the 

docket, contact Docket Services, 

telephone (202) 366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Electronic Access 

You may see all the comments online 

through the Federal Document 

Management System (FDMS) at http://

www.regulations.gov. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments, go to http://

www.regulations.gov and/or Room 

W12–140 on the ground level of the 

West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue 

SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

18694 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 66 / Tuesday, April 7, 2015 / Notices 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 

U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments 

from the public to better inform its 

rulemaking process. DOT posts these 

comments, without edit, including any 

personal information the commenter 

provides, to www.regulations.gov, as 

described in the system of records 

notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can 

be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy. 

II. Background 

On January 16, 2015, FMCSA 

published a notice of receipt of 

exemption applications from certain 

individuals, and requested comments 

from the public (80 FR 2473). That 

notice listed 51 applicants’ case 

histories. The 51 individuals applied for 

exemptions from the vision requirement 

in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who 

operate CMVs in interstate commerce. 

Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, 

FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2- 

year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption 

would likely achieve a level of safety 

that is equivalent to or greater than the 

level that would be achieved absent 

such exemption.’’ The statute also 

allows the Agency to renew exemptions 

at the end of the 2-year period. 

Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the 

51 applications on their merits and 

made a determination to grant 

exemptions to each of them. 

III. Vision and Driving Experience of 

the Applicants 

The vision requirement in the 

FMCSRs provides: 

A person is physically qualified to 

drive a commercial motor vehicle if that 

person has distant visual acuity of at 

least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye 

without corrective lenses or visual 

acuity separately corrected to 20/40 

(Snellen) or better with corrective 

lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least 

20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or 

without corrective lenses, field of vision 

of at least 70° in the horizontal meridian 

in each eye, and the ability to recognize 

the colors of traffic signals and devices 

showing red, green, and amber (49 CFR 

391.41(b)(10)). 

FMCSA recognizes that some drivers 

do not meet the vision requirement but 

have adapted their driving to 

accommodate their vision limitation 

and demonstrated their ability to drive 

safely. The 51 exemption applicants 

listed in this notice are in this category. 

They are unable to meet the vision 

requirement in one eye for various 

reasons, including refractive amblyopia, 

amblyopia, corneal scar, macular scar, 

advanced cataract, esotropia, aphakia, 

atypical macular degeneration, 

prosthetic eye, glaucoma, enucleation, 

strabismic amblyopia, central retinal 

vein occlusion, complete loss of vision, 

optic nerve hypoplasia, retinal 

detachment, macular hole, decreased 

vision, loss of central field, myopic 

macular degeneration, exotropia, 

ischemic optic neuropathy, high 

myopia, retinal vascular occlusion, full 

thickness macular hole, ophthalmic 

artery calcium embolus, optic nerve 

damage, and dense cataract. In most 

cases, their eye conditions were not 

recently developed. Thirty of the 

applicants were either born with their 

vision impairments or have had them 

since childhood. 

The 21 individuals that sustained 

their vision conditions as adults have 

had it for a range of four to 56 years. 

Although each applicant has one eye 

which does not meet the vision 

requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), 

each has at least 20/40 corrected vision 

in the other eye, and in a doctor’s 

opinion, has sufficient vision to perform 

all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV. 

Doctors’ opinions are supported by the 

applicants’ possession of valid 

commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) or 

non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before 

issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to 

knowledge and skills tests designed to 

evaluate their qualifications to operate a 

CMV. 

All of these applicants satisfied the 

testing requirements for their State of 

residence. By meeting State licensing 

requirements, the applicants 

demonstrated their ability to operate a 

CMV, with their limited vision, to the 

satisfaction of the State. 

While possessing a valid CDL or nonCDL, these 51 drivers have been 

authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate 

commerce, even though their vision 

disqualified them from driving in 

interstate commerce. They have driven 

CMVs with their limited vision in 

careers ranging from two to 50 years. In 

the past three years, five of the drivers 

were involved in crashes and six were 

convicted of moving violations in a 

CMV. 

The qualifications, experience, and 

medical condition of each applicant 

were stated and discussed in detail in 

the January 16, 2015 notice (80 FR 

2473). 

IV. Basis for Exemption Determination 

Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, 

FMCSA may grant an exemption from 

the vision requirement in 49 CFR 

391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely 

to achieve an equivalent or greater level 

of safety than would be achieved 

without the exemption. Without the 

exemption, applicants will continue to 

be restricted to intrastate driving. With 

the exemption, applicants can drive in 

interstate commerce. Thus, our analysis 

focuses on whether an equal or greater 

level of safety is likely to be achieved by 

permitting each of these drivers to drive 

in interstate commerce as opposed to 

restricting him or her to driving in 

intrastate commerce. 

To evaluate the effect of these 

exemptions on safety, FMCSA 

considered the medical reports about 

the applicants’ vision as well as their 

driving records and experience with the 

vision deficiency. 

To qualify for an exemption from the 

vision requirement, FMCSA requires a 

person to present verifiable evidence 

that he/she has driven a commercial 

vehicle safely with the vision deficiency 

for the past 3 years. Recent driving 

performance is especially important in 

evaluating future safety, according to 

several research studies designed to 

correlate past and future driving 

performance. Results of these studies 

support the principle that the best 

predictor of future performance by a 

driver is his/her past record of crashes 

and traffic violations. Copies of the 

studies may be found at Docket Number 

FMCSA–1998–3637. 

FMCSA believes it can properly apply 

the principle to monocular drivers, 

because data from the Federal Highway 

Administration’s (FHWA) former waiver 

study program clearly demonstrate the 

driving performance of experienced 

monocular drivers in the program is 

better than that of all CMV drivers 

collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345, 

March 26, 1996). The fact that 

experienced monocular drivers 

demonstrated safe driving records in the 

waiver program supports a conclusion 

that other monocular drivers, meeting 

the same qualifying conditions as those 

required by the waiver program, are also 

likely to have adapted to their vision 

deficiency and will continue to operate 

safely. 

The first major research correlating 

past and future performance was done 

in England by Greenwood and Yule in 

1920. Subsequent studies, building on 

that model, concluded that crash rates 

for the same individual exposed to 

certain risks for two different time 

periods vary only slightly (See Bates 

and Neyman, University of California 

Publications in Statistics, April 1952). 

Other studies demonstrated theories of 

predicting crash proneness from crash 

history coupled with other factors. 

These factors—such as age, sex, 

geographic location, mileage driven and 

conviction history—are used every day 

by insurance companies and motor 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 66 / Tuesday, April 7, 2015 / Notices 18695 

vehicle bureaus to predict the 

probability of an individual 

experiencing future crashes (See Weber, 

Donald C., ‘‘Accident Rate Potential: An 

Application of Multiple Regression 

Analysis of a Poisson Process,’’ Journal 

of American Statistical Association, 

June 1971). A 1964 California Driver 

Record Study prepared by the California 

Department of Motor Vehicles 

concluded that the best overall crash 

predictor for both concurrent and 

nonconcurrent events is the number of 

single convictions. This study used 3 

consecutive years of data, comparing the 

experiences of drivers in the first 2 years 

with their experiences in the final year. 

Applying principles from these 

studies to the past 3-year record of the 

51 applicants, five of the drivers were 

involved in crashes, and six were 

convicted of moving violations in a 

CMV. All the applicants achieved a 

record of safety while driving with their 

vision impairment, demonstrating the 

likelihood that they have adapted their 

driving skills to accommodate their 

condition. As the applicants’ ample 

driving histories with their vision 

deficiencies are good predictors of 

future performance, FMCSA concludes 

their ability to drive safely can be 

projected into the future. 

We believe that the applicants’ 

intrastate driving experience and history 

provide an adequate basis for predicting 

their ability to drive safely in interstate 

commerce. Intrastate driving, like 

interstate operations, involves 

substantial driving on highways on the 

interstate system and on other roads 

built to interstate standards. Moreover, 

driving in congested urban areas 

exposes the driver to more pedestrian 

and vehicular traffic than exists on 

interstate highways. Faster reaction to 

traffic and traffic signals is generally 

required because distances between 

them are more compact. These 

conditions tax visual capacity and 

driver response just as intensely as 

interstate driving conditions. The 

veteran drivers in this proceeding have 

operated CMVs safely under those 

conditions for at least 3 years, most for 

much longer. Their experience and 

driving records lead us to believe that 

each applicant is capable of operating in 

interstate commerce as safely as he/she 

has been performing in intrastate 

commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds 

that exempting these applicants from 

the vision requirement in 49 CFR 

391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level 

of safety equal to that existing without 

the exemption. For this reason, the 

Agency is granting the exemptions for 

the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C. 

31136(e) and 31315 to the 51 applicants 

listed in the notice of January 16, 2015 

(80 FR 2473). 

We recognize that the vision of an 

applicant may change and affect his/her 

ability to operate a CMV as safely as in 

the past. As a condition of the 

exemption, therefore, FMCSA will 

impose requirements on the 51 

individuals consistent with the 

grandfathering provisions applied to 

drivers who participated in the 

Agency’s vision waiver program. 

Those requirements are found at 49 

CFR 391.64(b) and include the 

following: (1) That each individual be 

physically examined every year (a) by 

an ophthalmologist or optometrist who 

attests that the vision in the better eye 

continues to meet the requirement in 49 

CFR 391.41(b)(10) and (b) by a medical 

examiner who attests that the individual 

is otherwise physically qualified under 

49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual 

provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s 

or optometrist’s report to the medical 

examiner at the time of the annual 

medical examination; and (3) that each 

individual provide a copy of the annual 

medical certification to the employer for 

retention in the driver’s qualification 

file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s 

qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must have a copy 

of the certification when driving, for 

presentation to a duly authorized 

Federal, State, or local enforcement 

official. 

V. Discussion of Comments 

FMCSA received three comments in 

this proceeding. The comments are 

discussed below. 

Letitia Robinson, David Wang, and 

Eliezer Lebron are all in favor of 

granting Vantha Yeam an exemption 

from the Federal vision standard. 

IV. Conclusion 

Based upon its evaluation of the 51 

exemption applications, FMCSA 

exempts the following drivers from the 

vision requirement in 49 CFR 

391.41(b)(10), subject to the 

requirements cited above (49 CFR 

391.64(b)): 

David C. Berger (PA) 

Phillip J. Boes (MN) 

Ronald Bostick (SC) 

Raymond L. Bradshaw (TX) 

Ricky D. Cain (NM) 

Jeffrey L. Coachman (NY) 

Dewayne L. Cunningham (IL) 

Robert W. Cushing (NH) 

Joel K. Cutchin (VA) 

Keith Dionisi (MI) 

Wolfgang K. Faulkingham (ME) 

John D. Fortino Jr. (NY) 

Ricky J. Franklin (OR) 

James P. Gapinski (MN) 

Harley D. Gray (IL) 

David N. Groff (PA) 

Robert J. Hansen (MN) 

Adrian Haro (CO) 

Kevin L. Himes (CO) 

Ervin A. James, Jr. (NC) 

Jeffrey G. Kalla (NV) 

Jackie Lee (FL) 

Joseph J. Lewis (WA) 

Keith A. Looney, Jr. (AR) 

Van C. Mac (IL) 

Michael P. McCabe (MI) 

Chris D. McCance (IL) 

Michael W. McCann (VA) 

O’Dell M. McKnight (SC) 

Anthony R. Melton (SC) 

Preston S. Nehring (FL) 

Dennis J. Oie (MN) 

Orlan R. Ott (IA) 

Rodney W. Phelps (KY) 

Leonardo Polonski (MA) 

Don C. Powell, Jr. (NY) 

Luis A. Ramos (FL) 

Kevin C. Rich (NC) 

Ronald D. Schwab (MN) 

Gary W. Shelton, Jr. (FL) 

Gerardo Silva (IL) 

James A. Spittal (OR) 

Paul J. Stewart (CO) 

David A. Stinelli (PA) 

Ingrid V. Taylor (MI) 

Roger A. Thein, Jr. (WI) 

Russell E. Ward (NH) 

Bobby M. Warren (KY) 

Steven E. Williams (GA) 

Rex A. Wright (IL) 

Vantha Yeam (PA) 

In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) 

and 31315, each exemption will be valid 

for 2 years unless revoked earlier by 

FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked 

if: (1) The person fails to comply with 

the terms and conditions of the 

exemption; (2) the exemption has 

resulted in a lower level of safety than 

was maintained before it was granted; or 

(3) continuation of the exemption would 

not be consistent with the goals and 

objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. 

If the exemption is still effective at the 

end of the 2-year period, the person may 

apply to FMCSA for a renewal under 

procedures in effect at that time. 

Issued on: April 1, 2015. 

Larry W. Minor, 

Associate Administrator for Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07905 Filed 4–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE CODE 4910–EX–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES