alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Permits, New Source RevieToxics Subcommittee:

Climate Change Workgroup

Co-Chairs:

Eric Svenson, PSEG

Mark Macleod, EDF

Peter Tsirigotis, EPA

October 7, 2009
Background

• PSD Tailoring Rule for GHGs proposed by 

– Initially, proposal focuses on new and modif

sources emitting GHGs >25K tons of CO2e

• EPA’s Mobile Source rule scheduled to b

Spring 2010

– GHGs will become a regulated pollutant– PSD will apply to major industrial sources

• EPA recognizes that States will need sup

BACT determinations are being made fo

– Technical information and guidance

• The Climate Change Workgroup was form

Permits, New Source Review and Toxics to get CAAAC input on how best to prov

– Kick-off call last week– First meeting yesterday
Current Workgroup Charge

• Focus on the BACT requirement, includin

and guidance that would be useful for EPconcerning the technical, economic, and performance characteristics of potential 

• Identify and discuss approaches to enable 

permitting authorities to apply the BACT consistent, practical and efficient manne

• Explore new and innovative approaches t

incorporated in the BACT analysis within of the current Clean Air Act

• Develop an initial Workgroup draft by the 
BACT Topic Areas

• Topic Area 1: Technical Information and 

GHG Control Technologies, Measures an

• Topic Area 2: Insights on evaluating the 

environmental, economic impacts of GHexample:

– Energy efficiency considerations such as dem

management, or plant-wide efficiency stand

– Collateral pollutant impacts

• Topic Area 3: Evaluating and encouragin

emerging GHG control technologies and 
The BACT Process – In Gener

• EPA gave a presentation on its “top dow

including the following 5-Step process: 

– Step 1: Identify all potential control techno– Step 2: Eliminate technically infeasible opti– Step 3: Rank remaining controls by effective– Step 4: Evaluate most effective controls and 

• Assumes the best control option is BACT un

to have unacceptable energy, environmentaimpacts

– Step 5: Select BACT

• BACT can be no less stringent than the a
Group Discussion

• State permit writers need sufficient 

information and guidance to conducdeterminations beginning potentially 

• Group also interested in exploring ne

innovative approaches for determinithe unique issues surrounding GHGs

• Need to balance the need for a quic

the opportunity to promote innovati

• Explored interim work products that 

focus the workgroup and lead to a pcase studies, compiling available inf
Next Steps

• Goal: Draft product for review by end of y

– Initially workgroup will focus on case studies to 

permit writers will likely face 

– Engage in primary needs first

• technical information and data• Guidance on likely and relatively straight-forw

– Explore innovative concepts along the way (usu

individuals will provide the workgroup with a pdiscussion)

• We will hold meetings on a bi-weekly basi

– Will update full subcommittee regularly – Post interim products and information on subc
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Albert A. Notini, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ALBERT A. NOTINIAlbert A. NotiniPresident and Chief Operating
Officer (Co-Principal Financial Officer)
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
# Citizen-Soldier brothers from New Jersey deploying to Southwest Asia

/ Published Oct. 20, 2014

LAWRENCEVILLE, N.J. - As children, Dave and Davis Valentin grew up doing most things together. 

As adults, the two Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, siblings still do. Both attend classes at Bergen County College and both enlisted in the New Jersey Army National Guard in November 2013.

Now, privates first class Valentin will deploy to Southwest Asia along with 70 other members of the 2nd-113th Security Forces (SECFOR) Platoon.

“I think it’s good that we get to deploy together,” said Davis, the younger of the pair. “It definitely makes it easier to have somebody you know, somebody you grew up, with deploying with you.”

Affectionately known among their platoon as the “wonder twins” for their similarities in both looks and mannerisms, the brothers spent Oct. 11 saying their goodbyes to family and friends during a departure ceremony at the Jersey City armory.

The two weren’t the only pair of siblings in the formation that day.

Capt. Charles Kratochvil and his younger brother 1st Lt. Christian Kratochvil will also deploy to Southwest Asia with the unit, as part of the Base Defense Operations Center platoon.

Twenty-eight year old Charles received his commission in 2008, the same year his younger brother enlisted in the Army National guard. Christian won’t accept his commission until 2011.

“I always knew I was going to be joining the military, but I had no idea he’d actually come with me,” Charles said.

Being four year’s older than his brother, Charles said that the two weren’t always the closest growing up. He said he’s looking forward to the months deployed together.

“I don’t have to like him, but I have to love him,” he joked. “It’s cool deploying with him. It’s nice to go with someone I’ve known my whole life.”

For Christian, 25, the mission represents the only opportunity he may have to deploy for his country.

“This is the last chance a lot of the fresh new lieutenants and new Soldiers have to deploy for the state of New Jersey,” he said. “It’s their chance to make their mark and to do as much as they can for their country. That’s why I’m proud and excited to go.”
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                                  JURISDICTION
----                                                  ------------
<S>                                                   <C>
AmerUs Life Insurance Company                         Iowa
Delta Life Corporation                                Delaware
Delta Life and Annuity Company                        Tennessee
AmVestors Financial Corporation                       Kansas
American Investors Life Insurance Company, Inc.       Kansas
AmVestors Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc.                Kansas
Annuity International Marketing Corporation           Kansas
Financial Benefit Life Insurance Company              Florida
The Insurance Mart, Inc.                              Florida
Rainbow Card Pack Publication, Inc.                   Florida
AmerUs Capital I                                      Delaware Business Trust
AmerUs Capital II                                     Delaware Business Trust
AmerUs Capital Management Group, Inc.                 Iowa
ACM Properties, Inc.                                  Iowa
Maxx Housing, Inc.                                    Iowa
</TABLE>
J.M.H., Mother of C.T.H. and 

K.T.H.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2396

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 6, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Mary Polson, Judge.

J.M.H., pro se, for Appellant.

Dwight O. Slater, Appellate Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of 

Children and Families; Kelley Schaeffer, Sanford, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem 

Program.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date*                         April 3, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on March 27, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 121 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2015-43, CP2015-54.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2015-07671 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 of Xinhua China Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Clement Wu, Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
- The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 			   			Dated: February 14, 2007                                                             /s/ Clement Wu                                                                                                                 Clement Wu, Chief Financial			                                                                                                    Officer and a Director (Principal			                                                                                                    Accounting Officer)
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.45


 


Guarantee Contract


 


Contract No.:SJZ0910720130006-12


 


Pledgor : Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd


 


Pledgee : Hua Xia Bank Shijiazhuang Jianhua Branch


 


Signing Date :January 31, 2013


 


Pledge Definition :   To ensure multiple loans Party
B (Pledgee) has lent to Shijie Kaiyuan Auto Trade Co., Ltd.., Party A (Pledgor) is willing to provide the Maximum Guarantee hereunder
for Party B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB150, 000,000


 


Pledge Term : From January 31, 2013 to January 30, 2014
EXHIBIT 31.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ming S. Liu, Chief Executive Officer of eGene, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report (the "Quarterly Report") on Form 10-
QSB of the Company.

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the Company's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.



Dated: August 11, 2005         By: /s/ Ming S. Liu
                               Ming S. Liu
                               Chief Executive Officer, Executive
                               Vice President and Director
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Par 3 Services,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Daniel
L. Hodges,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: September 4, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                              C.E.O. CERTIFICATION




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vapor Fuel Technologies, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September  30, 2002, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, C. Thomas Davis,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ C. Thomas Davis
C. Thomas Davis
Chief Executive Officer
January 22, 2003
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-31116

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES D. MATTINGLY, JR.,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-50011

- - - - - - - - - -

July 30, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles D. Mattingly, Jr., appeals his guilty plea

conviction and sentence for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1343. Mattingly argues that the district court erred in

calculating the amount of loss under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(1) and

in awarding a two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice

under § 3C1.1.
No. 95-31116

-2-

The district court did not err in determining that the

intended loss exceeded $10,000. See United States v. Henderson,

19 F.3d 917, 927-28 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 207

(1994); U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1, comment. (n.7). The district court did

not clearly err in awarding a two-level enhancement for

obstruction of justice. See U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, comment. (n.3(c)).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Timothy B. Murphy, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Investors Capital
     Holdings, Ltd.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this annual report is being prepared; and

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


Date: June 29, 2005

By: /s/ Timothy B. Murphy
-----------------------------------------------
Timothy B. Murphy, Executive Vice President,
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
(principal financial officer)
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY                                           Fax (713) 651-0849
PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
1100 Louisiana  Suite 3800   Houston, Texas 77002-5218  Telephone (713) 651-9191







                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING FIRM



      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 for Geodyne Energy Income Limited
Partnership III-G.


                                          //s// Ryder Scott Company
                                                 Petroleum Engineers

                                          RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                          PETROLEUM ENGINEERS




Houston, Texas
January 19, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Pyramid Breweries Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-91290 and 333-16311) on Form S-8 of Pyramid Breweries Inc. of our report
dated January 23, 2004, with respect to the balance sheets of Pyramid Breweries
Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Pyramid Breweries Inc.

Our report refers to our audit of the disclosures added to revise the 2001
financial statements, as more fully described in Note 1 to the financial
statements. However, we were not engaged to audit, review or apply any
procedures to the 2001 financial statements other than with respect to such
disclosures. Our report also refers to the adoption of statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, on January 1,
2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 12, 2004