### 13101 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2012 / Notices

information on other topics that they think are relevant to developing policies consistent with open, transparent, voluntary, consensus-based processes for developing consumer data privacy codes of conduct. Please note that the Government will not pay for response preparation or for the use of any information contained in the response.

Dated: February 29, 2012. Lawrence E. Strickling, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information.
[FR Doc. 2012–5220 Filed 3–2–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–60–P**

**COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION** 

**Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review** 

**AGENCY :**  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice of intent to renew.

**SUMMARY :**  In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq. ), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected costs and burden; it includes the actual data collection instruments (if any).

**DATES :**  Comments must be submitted on or before April 4, 2012.

**ADDRESSES :**  Send comments regarding the burden estimated or any other aspect of the information collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the addresses below. Please refer to OMB Control No. 3038–0021 in any correspondence. Martin B. White, Office of the General

Counsel, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581; and Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for CFTC, 725 17th Street Washington, DC 20503. Comments may also be submitted by any of the following methods:

The agency’s Web site, at http:// comments.cftc.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments through the Web site.

Mail: David A. Stawick, Secretary of the Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581. Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mail above.

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Please submit your comments using only one method and identity that it is for the renewal of 3038–0021.

All comments must be submitted in English, or if not, accompanied by an English translation. Comments will be posted as received to www.cftc.gov. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. If you wish the Commission to consider information that you believe is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, a petition for confidential treatment of the exempt information may be submitted according to the procedures established in § 145.9 of the Commission’s regulations. See 17 CFR 145.9.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Martin B. White, Office of the General Counsel, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418–5129; Fax: (202) 418–5567; email: mwhite@cftc.gov and refer to OMB Control No. 3038–0021.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Title: Regulations Governing Bankruptcies of Commodity Brokers (OMB Control No. 3038–0021). This is a request for extension of a currently approved information collection.

Abstract: This collection of information involves recordkeeping and notice requirements in the CFTC’s bankruptcy rules for commodity broker liquidations, 17 CFR Part 190. These requirements are intended to facilitate the effective, efficient, and fair conduct of liquidation proceedings for commodity brokers and to protect the interests of customers in these proceedings.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the CFTC’s regulations were published on December 30, 1981. See 46 FR 63035 (Dec. 30, 1981). The Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on December 29, 2012 (73 FR 81916).

Burden statement: Commodity broker liquidations occur at unpredictable and irregular intervals; for purposes of estimating information collection burden this notice assumes an average of one commodity broker liquidation every three years. The CFTC further notes that the information collection burden will vary in particular commodity broker liquidations depending on the size of the commodity broker, the extent to which accounts are able to be quickly transferred, and other factors specific to the circumstances of the liquidation. The Commission estimates the average burden of this collection of information as follows:
Rule 190.02(a)(1)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .33.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 2.

Estimated Hours per Response: .5. Estimated Total Hours per Year: .33.
Rule 190.02(a)(2)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .33.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 1.

Estimated Hours per Response: 2. Estimated Total Hours per Year: .67.
Rule 190.02(b)(1)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .33.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 4.

Estimated Hours per Response: 1. Estimated Total Hours per Year: 1.32.
Rule 190.02(b)(2)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .33.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 10,000.

Estimated Hours per Response: .1. Estimated Total Hours per Year: 330.
Rule 190.02(b)(3)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .05 (rarely if ever occurs).

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 10,000.

Estimated Hours per Response: .2. Estimated Total Hours per Year: 100.
Rule 190.02(b)(4)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .33.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 10,000.

Estimated Hours per Response: .2. Estimated Total Hours per Year: 660.
Rule 190.02(c)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .33.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 10.

Estimated Hours per Response: 10. Estimated Total Hours per Year: 33.
Rule 190.03(a)(1)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .33.


### 13102 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2012 / Notices

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 20,000.

Estimated Hours per Response: .01. Estimated Total Hours per Year: 66.
Rule 190.03(a)(2)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .33.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 20,000.

Estimated Hours per Response: .02. Estimated Total Hours per Year: 132.
Rule 190.04(b)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .33.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 40,000.

Estimated Hours per Response: .01. Estimated Total Hours per Year: 132.
Rule 190.06(b)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: .33.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 1.

Estimated Hours per Response: 1. Estimated Total Hours per Year: .33.
Rule 190.06(d)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: 125.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 1000.

Estimated Hours per Response: .05. Estimated Total Hours per Year: 6250.
Rule 190.10(c)

Estimated Respondents or Recordkeepers per Year: 125.

Estimated Reports Annually per Respondent or Recordkeeper: 1000.

Estimated Hours per Response: .05. Estimated Total Hours per Year: 6250. There are estimated to be no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection.

Dated February 28, 2012. David A. Stawick, Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–5222 Filed 3–2–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6351–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers** 

**Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the St. Lucie**  **South Beach and Dune Restoration Project located in St. Lucie County,**  **Florida**

**AGENCY :**  U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

Cooperating Agency: The Bureau of Ocean Energy, Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) is a cooperating federal agency having jurisdiction by law because the proposed federal action includes potential future use of beach compatible sand originating from the outer continental shelf.

**ACTION :**  Notice of availability.

**SUMMARY :**  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is issuing this notice to advise the public that a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been completed and is available for review and comment.

**DATES :**  In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), we have filed the FEIS with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for publication of their notice of availability in the Federal Register. The EPA notice officially starts the 45-day review period for this document. It is the goal of the USACE to have this notice published on the same date as the EPA notice. However, if that does not occur, the date of the EPA notice will determine the closing date for comments on the FEIS. Comments on the FEIS must be submitted to the address below under **FOR FURTHER**
**CONTACT INFORMATION** and must be received no later than 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, Monday, April 16, 2012.

Scoping: A Scoping Meeting was held in Ft. Pierce, FL on May 19th, 2010 to gather information for the preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). A Public notice was posted in a St. Lucie County newspaper, and mailed to current stakeholder lists with notification of the public meetings requesting input and comments on issues that should be addressed in the DEIS.

DEIS and Public Comment. The Notice of Availability of the DEIS was published June 3 2011, with a comment period ending 5 p.m. July 18, 2011. A public comment meeting was held June 29, 2011 at the St. Lucie County government offices. After receiving public comments, the USACE reviewed all relevant comments and concerns. After the comment period, the DEIS was revised to be the FEIS in order to address the comments and concerns, or to include additional requested information. On January 5, 2012, the applicant revised its preferred alternative to an alternative with fewer adverse environmental effects on nearshore hardbottom.

**ADDRESSES :**  The FEIS is available online on the Jacksonville District Web site at: http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/ Divisions/Regulatory/interest.htm. Printed copies of the FEIS are also available for public review at the following locations:

1. St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Ave., Fort Pierce, FL 34982.

2. St. Lucie County Ft. Pierce Branch Library 101 Melody Lane, Fort Pierce,
34950.

3. St. Lucie County Lakewood Park Branch Library 7605 Santa Barbara Drive, Fort Pierce, 34951.

4. St. Lucie West Library J Building, 500 NW. California Blvd., Port St. Lucie, 34986,

5. USACE Palm Beach Gardens Regulatory Office, 4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 500 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
33410.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ms. Leah Oberlin, Chief, Palm Beach Gardens Section, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, 4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 500, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410, Telephone: 561– 472–3517, Fax: 561–626–6971.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The project is being reviewed under Department of the Army permit application number SAJ–2009– 03448(IP–GGL). The primary Federal involvement associated with the Proposed Action is the dredging and discharge of fill within navigable waters of the United States pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).

Proposed Action: The project is located on South Hutchinson Island in St. Lucie County and is approximately 3.4 miles in length. The project coincides approximately with Florida Department of Environmental Protection Shoreline Monuments R–98 to R– 115+1,000 ft, the St. Lucie/Martin County line. The northern limit of the project is approximately 16,000 feet south of the Hutchinson Island Nuclear Plant. The project was proposed by the St. Lucie County Erosion District (applicant) to stabilize the beach and dune to protect essential upland infrastructure, upland property, expand turtle nesting habitat, and increase recreational opportunities. The applicant’s preference is to utilize a hopper dredge to obtain 485,900 cubic yards of beach compatible sand from a borrow area approximately 3.0 miles offshore of St. Lucie County. The hopper dredge would deliver the sand by hydraulic pumping onto the project beach. The applicant has stated the project was anticipated to adverselyaffect approximately 1.57 acre of nearshore hard bottom habitat. The impacts include: 0.55 acres of near-shore hard bottom habitat through direct burial,