alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 5 8 6

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T h u r s d a y

, A u g u s t 2 7

, 2 0 1 5 3 : 5 3 P M

T o : p g u c k i a n @ q u a l c o m m

. c o m

D e a r M r

. G u c k i a n :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k e t N o

. F A A

− 2 0 1 5

− 1 5 8 6 )

. T h i s i n f

o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A

v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A

A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

D e s c r i b e t h e a i r c r a f

t m a k e s

, m o d e l s

, a n d t

y p e s ( i

. e

. , f i x e d

‐ w i n g

, r o t

o r c r a f t

, l i g h t e r

‐ t h a n

‐ a i r ) f

o r t h e p r o p o s e d

U A S o p e r a t i o n

. T h e d e s c r i p t i o n s s h o u l d i n c l u d e t h e m a x i m u m w e i g h t ( i n c l u d i n g p a y l o a d )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n

c a n b e l o c a t

e d i n t h e a i r c r a f

t m a n u a l s

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t

a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t

e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f

a a

. g o v

. I f y o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v e b y 9 / 1 0 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f

o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4

.

S i n c e r e l y ,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
Petition for exemption:

Michael Bendinelli

1109 Stonewall Preston rd. 

Stonewall LA 71078

Phone: (318) 518-5022

Email: eagleeyeviewimages@gmail.com

Section 333 14 CFR : Flying for commercial purpose

I am applying for relief for the purpose to fly my U.A.S. for commercial usage. I wish for relief to 

accommodate customers who wish to hire me to fly my U.A.S. for residential photographs and or video 

of their property. I also am applying for relief to photograph and or video customers in the commercial 

sector such as fly over of fields for crop inspection, oil and gas inspections of pipelines and wells. 

The exemption will benefit the public by allowing a lower cost solution to the above mentioned.

The exemption would not adversely affect safety because I have read and understand all FAA rules and 

regulations and intend to not only follow the rules and regulations but also follow my personal rules in 

which I do not believe in flying over any person or property in which I perceive a potential of a possible 

risk to harm or damage in anyway.

I am also a member of the A.M.A. and insured through their organization. I also believe in values and 

guidelines of the A.M.A. The U.A.S. that I use is a 350 qx which is weighs less that 3 pounds.

Sincerely,

Michael Bendinelli
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3182 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3182

  To improve the Office of Refugee Resettlement shelter grant process.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 4, 2021

 Mr. Carper (for himself, Mr. Portman, and Mr. Tillis) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To improve the Office of Refugee Resettlement shelter grant process.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Shelters Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. OFFICE OF REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT SHELTER GRANT PROCESS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Adverse action.--The term ``adverse action'' means an 
        adverse criminal or regulatory action taken by the Federal 
        Government or a State or local government with respect to 
        contracting with a government entity or to the care of 
        children, including--
                    (A) the suspension or revocation of an operating 
                license; and
                    (B) any ongoing or pending investigation by the 
                Federal Government or a State or local government.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Health and Human Services.
            (3) Unaccompanied alien child.--The term ``unaccompanied 
        alien child'' has the meaning given the term in section 462(g) 
        of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g)).
    (b) Disclosure and Licensure.--With respect to Office of Refugee 
Resettlement grants to open or fund shelter facilities for 
unaccompanied alien children, the Secretary shall require each 
applicant--
            (1) to disclose in the grant application any adverse action 
        taken against the applicant during the 5-year period 
        immediately preceding the date on which the application is 
        submitted; and
            (2) to be licensed to operate such a facility in the 
        applicable State as of such date.
    (c) Information Sharing.--In considering an application for a grant 
referred to in subsection (b), the Secretary shall seek to collaborate 
with the appropriate regulatory agencies of the State in which the 
applicant intends to operate to conduct a review of State databases for 
information on adverse actions taken against the applicant.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Northeast   Mortgage
Corporation  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2004,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Sean Rogerson,  Vice-President  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Sean Rogerson
Sean Rogerson
Vice-President
(Principal Financial Officer)


August 12, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

***Certificate of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

 

               In connection with the quarterly report of Summus, Inc. (USA) (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bjorn D.Jawerth, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> -  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 
-  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

| Date:       November 12, 2003 |  /s/ Bjorn D. JawerthBjorn D. Jawerth Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 99(iii)


                                  Certification

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        OF OCEAN WEST HOLDING CORPORATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    (S)906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean West Holding
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Marshall L. Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

                  1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Date: February 11, 2003
                                       /s/ Marshall L. Stewart
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Marshall L. Stewart, President and Chief
                                              Executive Officer
### Regulatory
Eva lu at
i o?-
() 

# f 

# Jf-N
**~** 

# _ ) J; _ 

# .;f}) Docket No. 

### FAA- 

## ~b)~~



# J.f 

# 6 Directorate Identifier

: 

### ~ !fyoumake clwnge!:>

to the mlues



### in the tahle below, you must emure !hi! 

### totals updat<! uccordinf,!h



### IJ the.l do not. 

### dick (or Tob) 

### into and then 0111 

### (l!he **chan~ed** 

### cell

. Es tim ated Costs: Action

Costs per Pr o duct (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection

, propeller,

appliance) Work-hours
Labor Parts Cost Tota

l Costs Number

of Total Cost replacement)

(inc lud
e cost

(labor

+


# u.s.

fo r U.S.

F l eet 

### Do not includ

eoncondition
cos ts here

access, testing

, (@$85/h

pa

1 1s)

R egiste

r e d and

c l ose-up)

our)

Products 

### Apply Loctite 290 to setscrew threads at setscrew

0.1

$1



### 2,330 

### installation

0.0

$0 I I

'

' ' The known number
of products

in compliance: Total Costs of compliance

for U.S. fleet: 

### $22.135 Costs covered under warranty


### (if /mown)



# s On-Conditi

o n Costs: 

# ~ Action

Work-hours

Labor cost

Parts Cost

Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection,

(include access, (@$85/hour) replacement)

testing, and close- up)



## 7SpecialconsiderationsforEconomicAnalysis(UsethisfieldtoexplainanythingintheEstimatedCosrsrabletharwasassumedormightnotbeobvious.Thisfieldcanalsobeusedtoexplainwarrantycosts):ExecutiveOrder12866:CouldtheADbeconsidereda"significantregulatoryaction"?49)YES*D*Explanation:DOTRegulatoryPoliciesandProcedures:IstheADsignificant?GYES*0*Explanation:RegulatoryFlexibilityAct:WilltheADhaveasignificanteconomicimpactonasubstantialnumberofsmallentities?ExplainforeitheraYesorNoanswer.0YESOExplanation:IntrastateAviationinAlaska:ThisADcouldaffectintrastateaviationinAlaska.lsitappropriatetoincludespecificrequirementsforaircraftoperatedinAlaskawhereaviationmightbetheonlymodeoftransportation?YES*D*Explanation:8
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 
 2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OF THE FINISH LINE, INC. 

Pursuant to rights reserved under Section 13 of the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan of The Finish Line, Inc., as amended and restated (the
“Plan”), the Board of Directors of The Finish Line, Inc. hereby amends the Plan as follows: 
 Article 1. Amendment 

Section 1.1 Amendment to Section 10.2. Section 10.2 is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as
follows: 
 If the outstanding Shares or other securities of the Company, or both, for which the Award is then
exercisable or as to which the Award is to be settled shall at any time be changed or exchanged by declaration of a stock dividend, stock split, combination of shares, recapitalization, or reorganization, the Committee will, appropriately and
equitably adjust the number and kind of Shares or other securities which are subject to the Plan or subject to any Awards theretofore granted, and the exercise or settlement prices of such Awards, so as to maintain the proportionate number of Shares
or other securities without changing the aggregate exercise or settlement price, provided, however, that such adjustment shall be made so as to not affect the status of any Award intended to qualify as an ISO or as “performance based
compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. 
 Article 2. Miscellaneous 

Section 2.1 Entire Agreement. All other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan of The Finish Line, Inc. has been
executed this 20 th day of December, 2006 to be effective
as of 12:01 a.m. December 20, 2006. 
  

			
	The Finish Line, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/    JEFFREY H.
SMULYAN        

		 	 Jeffrey H. Smulyan, member of the

Compensation and Stock Option Committee

		
	By:	 	 /s/    BILL
KIRKENDALL        

		 	 Bill Kirkendall, member of the

Compensation and Stock Option Committee
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED PR 06-0422
IN REPETITION OF ALICIA KELLY FOR LEAVE ) TO SIT FOR THE JULY 2020 MONTANA BAR EXAMINATION 

### MAR 1 7 2020
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court O R D tite cf Montana

Alicia Kelly has petitioned for waiver ofRule I.C.1 ofthe Rules ofAdmission to the State Bar of Montana, which provides that a student applicant to take the bar examination "must have a Juris Doctoe'degree at the time ofthe examination. Kelly will complete the requirements for a Juris Doctorate from the Alexander Blewitt III School of Law at the University of Montana on May 29, 2020, but her degree will not actually be awarded by the University until August 14, 2020,about two weeks after the examination. In her efforts to complete her degree requirements,Kelly was restricted by the limitation on the number of credits that students may take in a semester. Having to wait until the February 2021 administration ofthe examination would cause undue hardship for Kelly. Rule VII.A. of the Rules of Admission provides that this Court "may, under circumstances it deems sufficient,waive any requirementunder these rules." Upon review of the petition, we conclude that the circumstances presented, particularly, Kelly's completion ofall requirements for a Juris Doctorate prior to the examination,are sufficient tojustify waiver ofthe degree requirement so that Kelly may sit for the July 2020 Montana Bar Examination. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED thatthepetition ofAlicia Kelly for waiver ofRule I.C.1 of the Rules of Admission to the State Bar ofMontana, requiring a student applicant to have a Juris Doctor degree at the time ofexamination, is GRANTED for purposes ofthe July 2020 administration ofthe Montana Bar Examination. Copies of this order shall be provided to the Petitioner and to the State Bar of Montana. DATED this 

## 17- day ofMarch,2020. 03/17/2020

Case Number: PR 06-0422ChiefJustice

ustices

2
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Oplink Communications, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Joseph Y. LiuJoseph Y. LiuChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
From: Thomas, Richard R (FAA)

To: "rmorland@amltd.co.uk"

Cc: Bryant, Matthew (FAA); "Liedler Courtney"; Keith Pharris; "emanuele.figlia@airbus.com"

Subject: EC120B, S/N 1120, AD 2015-24-51 Not Applicable

Date: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 11:32:45 AM

Attachments: FAA AD 2015-24-51.msg

Spline Flange Detail Inspection 1500 FH - 72 M.PDF

Dear Mr. Moreland -

Per the attached picture of the air conditioning system installation on EC120B, S/N 1120, Registration GEIZO, and your earlier email (also attached), FAA AD 2015-24-51 would not apply to this aircraft. I am

sorry we didn't make this more clear in the AD possibly creating significant unnecessary effort for you.

That said, we appreciate your due diligence and consideration of the AD based on the STC number

SR00491DE referenced therein.

If possible, I would appreciate it if you could provide the following information as it would help with our

root cause analysis:

 

1) The total hours on this aircraft,

2) The aircraft hours when you last accomplished the attached inspection of the Airbus flange

(presuming the aircraft has accumulated that many hours), and

3) If you've ever replaced the Airbus flange.

Respectfully,

Richard R. Thomas

Aerospace Engineer (Mechanical Systems)

ANM-100D Denver ACO

Office - 303.342.1085

Cell - 720.961.3663

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard [mailto:rmorland@amltd.co.uk]

Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 9:24 AM

To: Thomas, Richard R (FAA)

Subject: FAA AD 2015-24-51

Good Afternoon again Richard

Further to our earlier e-mail and your telephone conversation with Tony Stinson regarding the inspection

he has carried out in the field iaw FAA AD 2015-24-51.

The aircraft is an EC120B S/N:1120 Registration: G-EIZO.

Attached is a picture of the installation as requested with the old style Tail Rotor Drive.

Please forward an e-mail confirming that this particular aircraft is not applicable to AD 2015-24-51.

Thank you for all your assistance in this matter.

Regards

Richard Morland

Aero Maintenance Ltd
EXHIBIT 31(a)

        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14
               OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marcus Segal, chief executive officer of Star Energy Corporation
("Registrant") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Report") of
Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this Report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: August 11, 2006

/s/ Marcus Segal
-------------------------------
Marcus Segal
Chief Executive Officer
United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

Office of the Administrator

1400 Independence Avenue, SW · Washington, D.C. 20250-2001

www.nass.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

NASS ANTI-HARASSMENT POLICY STATEMENT

May 26, 2021

This policy statement supplements the USDA Anti-Harassment Policy Statement issued by 

Secretary Vilsack.

USDA 2021 Anti-Harassment Policy Statement

I fully support and echo Secretary Vilsack’s policy regarding harassment in the workplace. The 

National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) is committed to providing a workplace that is 

free from any form of harassment. A harassment free environment helps NASS attract, develop, 

and retain an outstanding and dedicated workforce, where every employee can contribute to a 

positive work environment essential to our strategic mission. I expect all employees, supervisors, 

managers, and senior executives to adhere to this policy and lead by example. Anyone not 

complying will be held fully accountable.

Any NASS employee wanting to file a complaint of harassment, whether it is EEO-related or 

not, should contact June Turner, Civil Rights Director, by phone at 202-720-8257 or by email at 

june.turner@usda.gov.

Hubert Hamer

Administrator