alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549



FORM 8-K/A



CURRENT REPORT



Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report: February 3, 2005
(Date of earliest event reported)





Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.(Exact name of registrant as specified in the charter)





|Delaware                                       | 0-19220               | 36-3664407                       
|---------------------------------------------- | --------------------- | ---------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (Commission File No.) | (IRS Employer Identification No.)

2901 Butterfield Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)





(630) 218-8000
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)





Not Applicable
Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

---



Item 4.01	Change in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.

The attached exhibit is the response from Deloitte & Touche LLP to the Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2005.

Item 9.01  Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c)  Exhibits

|Exhibit | Description                                                               
|------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|        |                                                                           
|16.1    | Letter of Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding change in certifying accountant.





---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.
(Registrant)





|By:   | /s/ Kelly Tucek                                                                                                
|----- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                                                                                                                
|      | Kelly Tucek                                                                                                    
|      | Vice President of the General Partner and principal financial officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.
|      |                                                                                                                
|Date: | February 16, 2005
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acrongenomics, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ron Lizée, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  August 17, 2005

By: /s/ Ron Lizee

Name: Ron Lizée

Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Denny’s Corporation:





We consent to the use of our reports dated February 27, 2017, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Denny’s Corporation as of December 28, 2016 and December 30, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 28, 2016, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2016, incorporated herein by reference and to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the registration statement.








/s/ KPMG LLP


Greenville, South Carolina


May 10, 2017
#### John J. Ronan, Adm’r, etc., v. The Michigan Mutual Life Ins. Co.

1. Life *Insurance—Limitations in Policies Are*Valid.—A provision in a policy of life insurance, that no suit arising out of the contract shall be begun more than one year after the death of the insured, is a lawful and enforcible limitation.

Assumpsit, upon a life insurance policy. Error to the Circuit Court of DeKalb County; the Hon. George W. Brown, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the April term, 1901.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed July 12, 1901.

Jones *&*Rogers and A. G-. Kennedy, attorneys for plaintiff in error.

James McCartney, attorney for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit in assumpsit brought by John J. Ronan, as administrator of the estate of Henry L. Bowers, deceased, upon a life insurance policy issued by the Michigan Mutual Life Insurance Company, a foreign insurance company located at Detroit, in the State of Michigan. Suit was begun October 10,1898. The policy was issued to said Henry L. Bowers on the 14th day of February, 1896, and the deceased came to his death by suicide on the 27th day of JSTovember, 1896.

At the time of the death of the insured it was supposed he had a life insurance policy in force. Search was made for the same on the day of the death, but no trace of it could be found.

Inquiry was made of Dollmeyer, the agent .of the company, as to who the beneficiary named in the policy was, but the agent had forgotten. The agent was requested to write to the company and ascertain about the policy and he did write to the company and it replied that it refused to pay the policy on the ground that the insured had committed suicide.

The policy was not found until more than a year after *356the time of the death of the insured, and soon thereafter suit was begun upon the same.

The court instructed the jury to find for the defendant.

The policy contained the following provisions:

> “ Mo suit arising out of this contract shall be begun more than one year after the death of the insured.”

Appellant endeavored to avoid the effect of this limitation by showing that the policy could not be found and consequently the name of the beneficiary could not be ascertained.

The evidence did not disclose any very earnest and thorough effort to ascertain the name of the beneficiary. The name of the company was known and that it disclaimed all liability thereunder.

Appellee did nothing to mislead those interested in the policy nor to prevent their 'ascertaining the contents of the contract.

The limitation as to the beginning of suit is a lawful one and enforcible. Peoria Ins. Co. v. Whitehill, 25 Ill. 466; May on Insurance, 4th Ed., Sec. 478; Hart v. Citizens Ins. Co., 86 Wis. 77.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS MANUEL OCHOA-CONTRERAS

and MARISOL OCHOA,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-75014

Agency Nos. A096-071-364

 A096-071-363

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Luis Manuel Ochoa-Contreras and Marisol Ochoa, natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

denying their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Cano-Merida

FILED

SEP 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-75014

v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002), and de novo claims of due process

violations, Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir. 2001). We deny

the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen because the BIA considered the evidence of petitioners’ U.S. citizen son

and daughter’s medical conditions and acted within its broad discretion in

determining that the evidence was insufficient to establish prima facie eligibility

for cancellation of removal. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002)

(BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary,

irrational, or contrary to law”). Petitioners’ contention that the BIA failed to

consider the cumulative impact of their hardship evidence fails because it is not

supported by the record.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2016131EN.01000101.xml

| 14.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7906 — Equistone Partners Europe/Mecaplast Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 131/01)

On 11 March 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7906. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7906. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40251 Summary Calendar

__________________

JOSEPH H. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN HESTER, Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas (6:94 CV 566)

______________________________________________

(July 31, 1995)

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Appellant Joseph H. Williams ("Williams"), proceeding pro
se, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). We affirm the dismissal of the district court for the following reasons:2

1. In the instant case, Williams's claim that he was denied due process because the prison regulatio n required a captain or major (rather than a lieutenant such as the Appellee John Hester ("Hester")) to classify a disciplinary infraction is wholly without merit. The classification called for by the prison regulation determines whether the disciplinary hearing will be classified as major or minor. Williams was not harmed inasmuch as the instant disciplinary case was classified as minor rather than major.
2. The trial court correctly determined that there was no showing that Hester w as involved in the investigation or prosecution of Williams's infraction and also that Williams failed to show that Hester's action denied Williams a fair and impartial hearing. Thus, Williams's claims based on W olff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539 (1974), are unavailing.
3. The equal protection argument advanced by Williams is frivolous; Williams has made no showing that Hester intentionally discriminated against him by grading the infraction or that he suffered as a result of the unauthorized grading. S ee Lavernia v. Lynaugh , 845 F.2d 493, 496 (5th Cir. 1988). Lacking an ar guable basis in law, the claims asserted by Williams were properly dismissed by the district court; certainly no abuse of discretion was occasioned by the dismissal.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 66 (Tuesday, April 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07921]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9083]


Notice of Charter Renewal for the President's Emergency Plan for 
AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Scientific Advisory Board

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 
the PEPFAR Scientific Advisory Board hereinafter referred to as ``the 
Board'', has renewed its charter for an additional 2 years.
    The Board serves the Global AIDS Coordinator in a solely advisory 
capacity concerning scientific, implementation, and policy issues 
related to the global response to HIV/AIDS. These issues will be of 
concern as they influence the priorities and direction of PEPFAR 
evaluation and research, the content of national and international 
strategies and implementation, and the role of PEPFAR in the 
international discourse regarding appropriate and resourced responses.
    For further information about the charter, please contact Julia 
MacKenzie, Senior Technical Advisor, Office of the U.S. Global AIDS 
Coordinator at (202) 663-1079 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a371b19311f1400131f30303a090e1b0e1f541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="da97bbb991bfb4a0b3bf90909aa9aebbaebff4bdb5ac">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 4, 2015.
Julia J. MacKenzie,
Senior Technical Advisor, Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-07921 Filed 4-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 4710-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Green Oaks Concepts,  Ltd.,
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned,  Daniel L. Hodges, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: November 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Jean
      Perrotti, Chief Financial Officer and Principle Accounting Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
              June 7, 2007
            
            /s/ Jean
              PerrottiName:
              Jean PerrottiTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer
              And
                Principle Accounting Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Star Energy Corporation (Registrant) for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (Report), I, Dr. Nafi Onat, chief executive officer
, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

|(1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered
          by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by
          this Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Dr. Nafi Onat

Dr. Nafi Onat

Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for
the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written
statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
P.1 

OAR Box 1796 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

59) VI-B-10 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37PM Sheet 59 of 107 
P.2 

A-90-37 

VI-B-10 

This document has been moved to IV-E-28 at the request of the project 

officer. It was incorrectly categorize originally.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This Certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of NCO
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. To the best of his knowledge, the undersigned, Steven L. Winokur,
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


         /s/  Steven L. Winokur, Chief Financial Officer
              ------------------------------------------
              Date: 3/21/03