alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# New Hampshire Guardsmen activated at 13 vaccination sites

/ Published Dec. 31, 2020

EXETER, N.H. – Thirteen vaccination sites officially opened for New Hampshire first responders and high-risk ambulatory care providers Dec. 29.

Teams of New Hampshire Guardsmen were assigned to each site to manage traffic, logistics and administer vaccines.

“We’ve been able to rotate people through very regularly, very easily,” said Sgt. 1st Class Jennifer Boisvert, noncommissioned officer in charge of the Exeter site. “From the time you drive in, to the time you get your vaccination, to actually leaving, you’re probably only here for about 20 minutes.”

Guardsmen funneled cars through security control points, confirmed appointments and checked IDs. Patients were then directed to a main lot, parked, and received vaccines while in their vehicles. After a 15-minute observation period, the process was complete.

Despite a successful first day, the process is expected to improve.

“We’re just going to get better as time goes on,” said Capt. James Miller, officer in charge at the Exeter location. “Today is day one.”

Miller was activated earlier this month to command a team of 11 Soldiers and Airmen for the first phase of vaccinations – one of more than 100 Guard members assigned to the state vaccination mission.

“We’re certainly doing something for the betterment of society,” Miller said. “We’re trying to take care of the community and make sure we can go back to normal as soon as possible.”

One of his most experienced Soldiers is Spc. Madalyn Stella, a combat medic who has been activated since April at COVID-19 testing sites. Her latest assignment entails a unique dynamic.

“Vaccinating people in their cars like we’re at McDonald’s and just handing them fries is pretty insane,” Stella said, “But it’s actually going really well. Being a field medic, I’m used to outside stuff. But administering drugs, like a vaccine outside, is pretty uncommon – even for the Army.”

Stella is prepared to remain on active duty orders until the mission is completed.

“We’re Soldiers and we just carry on and carry on,” Stella said. “And then when you take a second, you’re like, ‘Wow, I’m part of this bigger picture, and it’s pretty incredible.’ We’ll get through this one day at a time.”
"h'ú1i4v L. KtÀÀot



### Aw 

### ?oll*tøw hh.,þroL 

### OfflÂlt 

# Gnn.tr BnsrN 

## UNrrrnD AIR 

# Pol,l,uuoN CoNrnoL 

# DrsrRrcr

L 5

### 7 S

### l^ârt S-tree*, Bí.1.1'oV, 

## hll for 

### n;n' q 3 5L4 -3 53 7 ToL:

## 76O-872-82LL F*x¿

### 76O-872-GLOq

May I1,2015

Jared Blumenfeld Regional 

### Administrator EPA Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street SanFrancisco,

### CA 94105 In accordance 

### with 40 CFR Part 58.26,this letter certifies that the ambient air monitoring data

### for the Great Basin 

### Unified 

### Air Pollution Control 

### District (GBUAPCD) contained in the EPA

### Air Quality System (AQS) asof 

### May 

### lI,2015 are accurate and complete for the calendar year 2014. Both ambient concentration data andthe quality assurance data have been completely submitted to AQS. These data are accurate to the best of my knowledge taking into consideration the quality asstnance findings for the calendar year

### 2074.

### A summary report generated by AQS would, therefore, depict accurate sunìmary statistics for 

### 2014. Both precision and accuracy data

### for all GBUAPCD monitoring 

### of criteria pollutants 

### in2014 have also been submitted to AQS. Attached are copies of theAQS Quick Look 

### All Parameters Report (AMP450NC) and the Data Certification Report (AMP600).



### Air Pollution Control Off,rcer
Cc: (Via 

### Email) Matthew Lakin, USEPA Chief

### Air Quality Analysis 

### Office Fletcher Clover, USEPA Region 9

### Air Quality 

### Office Meredith Kurpius, USEPA Region 9

### Air Quality Offrce David Lutz, USEPA

### Air Monitoring Group Data Certification Contact 

### Phillip
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SMITH
CORONA CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO OF 
THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            6257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9955
<ALLOWANCES>                                       654
<INVENTORY>                                      17979
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 37173
<PP&E>                                           38654
<DEPRECIATION>                                   34326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   43689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            17116
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             3
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       14598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     43689
<SALES>                                          11114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 11114
<CGS>                                            10049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (7)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (5634)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        37
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (5671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (5671)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.90)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>                            This schedule contains summary financial
                                    information extracted from the consolidated
                                    Statements of Operations and Balance Sheets
                                    and is qualified in its entirety by
                                    reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1
<CURRENCY>                          US Dollars

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                     1
<CASH>                              1,020,000
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       41,463,000
<ALLOWANCES>                        756,000
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    51,128,000
<PP&E>                              75,174,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      12,188,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      169,546,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               37,725,000
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                            250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                          58,602,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        169,546,000
<SALES>                             140,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    140,011
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       132,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  2,519,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     5,140,000
<INCOME-TAX>                        2,605,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 2,535,000
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        2,535,000
<EPS-BASIC>                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.09


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-56996, 333-96825and 333-110905 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-116543and 333-130128 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 14,2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of deCODE genetics, Inc.,and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of deCODEgenetics, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, MassachusettsMarch 14, 2006

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sonus Networks, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Richard N. Nottenburg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



Date: July 30, 2009

/s/ RICHARD N. NOTTENBURG Richard N. Nottenburg
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
#### The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah *et al.,*plaintiffs in error, *vs.*Solomon’s Lodge, No. 1, F. and A. M., defendant in error.

A masonic lodge being a charitable institution, is exempt from taxation. This exemption extends to any hou3e belonging to it.

Injunction. Taxes. ' Before Judge Schley. Chatham county. At Chambers. November 26th, 1874.

For the facts of this case, see the decision.

"W. S. Basinger, for plaintiffs in error.

Rupus E. Lester, for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

This was a bill filed by the complainant against the defendants, praying for an injunction to restrain the collection of a city tax on the property of complainant as set forth in its bill, on the ground that said property is not subject to taxation under the laws of this state. The presiding judge granted the injunction prayed for, and the defendants excepted. The complainant alleges in its bill that it is a body corporate under the laws of this state, by the name of “Solomon’s Lodge,, Number one, Free and Accepted Masons;” that it is a charitable institution, and that the city property taxed, is held and used by it for charitable purposes. By the 798th section of the Code “all poor houses, alms houses, houses of industry, and *any house belonging to any charitable*institution,” are declared to be exempt from taxation. Is a masonic lodge a charitable institution ? It was so recognized and styled by the general assembly of this state as far back as 1796: See Marbury & Crawford’s Digest, 147. Assuming, as we are authorized to do, that a masonic lodge is a charitable institution, it necessarily follows from the express words of the statute, that *any house*belonging to it, is exempt from taxation. The lltlx paragraph'of the 798th section of the Code, declares that all *94stock's owned by the state, or by literary or charitable institutions, for *the legitimate purposes of such,*shall be exempt from taxation. It is insisted by the plaintiffs in error, that the words “any house belonging to any charitable institution,” should not be construed so as to mean *every*house belonging to *every*charitable institution. The reply is, that the words “any house belonging to any charitable institution,” are broad enough to include the house belonging to the complainant, as set forth in its bill. It is competent for the general assembly to pass an act restricting the meaning of the words contained in the Code, but until it shall do so, it is the duty of the courts to construe them in accordance with the plain and - unambiguous terms thereof.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3230 

To require the establishment of a working group to evaluate the food safety 

threat posed by beef imported from Brazil, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2021 

Mr. TESTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the establishment of a working group to evaluate 

the food safety threat posed by beef imported from 

Brazil, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WORKING GROUP ON BEEF IMPORTED FROM 

4 BRAZIL. 

5 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF WORKING GROUP.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days 

7 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec8 retary of Agriculture shall establish a working 

9 group— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3230 IS

1 (A) to evaluate the food safety threat 

2 posed by beef and beef products imported from 

3 Brazil; and 

4 (B) to make recommendations to the Sec5 retary with respect to whether the importation 

6 of beef and beef products from Brazil into the 

7 United States should be permitted. 

8 (2) MEMBERSHIP.—The Secretary shall ensure 

9 that the working group established under paragraph 

10 (1) includes— 

11 (A) experts on food safety; and 

12 (B) representatives of U.S. Customs and 

13 Border Protection and other Federal agencies 

14 with responsibilities relating to international 

15 trade. 

16 (b) TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF IMPORTS.—Beef 

17 and beef products imported from Brazil may not enter the 

18 United States during the period— 

19 (1) beginning on the date of the enactment of 

20 this Act; and 

21 (2) ending on the date on which the working 

22 group established under subsection (a)(1) submits to 

23 the Secretary the recommendations required by sub24 paragraph (B) of that subsection. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Mr. Eric Fygi Deputy General Counsel Department ofEnergy Washington, DC 20585 

# u.s. DEPARTMENT OFJUSTICE AntitnlstDivision



### Sharis A. Pozen Acting Assistant Attorney General

RFKMain Justice Buildmg 950 Pennsylvania Avenue. N.W. Washington. D.C. 20530-0001 (202)514-2401/ (202)616-2645 (Fax)

March 27,2012

Re: Energy Conservation Standards

Dear Deputy General Counsel Fygi:

I am responding to your January 31,2012 letter seekingthe views ofthe Attorney General about the potential impact on competition ofproposed energy conservation standards for certain types ofcommercial heating, air-conditioning, and water-heating equipment. Specifically, you are proposing amended standards for small, large, and very large water-cooled and evaporatively-cooled commercial package air conditioners and variable refrigerant flow (VRF) water-source heat pumps less than 17,000 BtuIh, and proposing new standards for VRF water-source heat pumps greater than or equal to 135,000 Btu/h and computerroom air conditioners. Yourrequest was submitted under Section 325(0)(2)(B)(i)(V) ofthe Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (ECPA), 42 U.S.C. 6295(0)(2)(B)(i)(5) and 42 U.S.C. 63l6(a), which requires the Attorney General to make a determination ofthe impact ofany lessening ofcompetition that is likelyto result from the imposition ofproposed energy conservation standards. The Attorney General's responsibility for responding to requests from other departments about the effect ofa program on competition has been delegated to the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division in 28 CFR § 0.40(g).

In conductingits analysis the Antitrust Division examines whether a proposed standard may lessen competition, for example, by substantiallylimiting consumer choice, byplacing certain manufacturers at an unjustified competitive disadvantage, 

### or by inducing avoidable inefficiencies in production or distribution ofparticularproducts. A lessening ofcompetition could result in higherprices to consumers, and perhaps thwart the intent ofthe revised standardsbyinducing substitutionto less efficient products.Eric J. Fygi March 27, 2012 2

We have reviewed the proposed standards contained in the Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (77 Fed. Reg. 2356, January 17, 2012). We have also reviewed supplementaryinformation submitted to the Attorney General bythe Department of Energy and listened bywebinarto the February 14,2009 public hearing on the proposed standards. Based on this review, our conclusion is that the proposed energy conservation standards for the above-mentioned types ofcommercial heating, air-conditioning, and water-heatingequipment are unlikely to have a significant adverse impact on competition. In reaching our conclusion, we note the absence ofany competitive

concerns raised by industryparticipants at the hearing and that these proposed energy standards correspond to the latest version ofthe relevant industry consensus standard.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Antitrust Division
**Exhibit 13.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F ofPerusahaan Perseroan (Persero) P.T. TelekomunikasiIndonesia Tbk. (the “Company”) for the yearly periodended December 31, 2005 as filed with the SecuritiesExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Rinaldi Firmansyah, Director of Finance of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Rinaldi Firmansyah       Name: Rinaldi Firmansyah Title:    Director of Finance and     Chief Financial OfficerDate: June 23, 2006
12:00 P.M.

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

February Crop Production

Executive Summary

Lance Honig, Chief

Crops Branch

February 9, 2016
USDA-NASS

2-9-16

Field Crops Fruit & Nuts Specialty Crops

Sugarcane Citrus

Contents
USDA-NASS

2-9-16

Objective Surveys 

(Size and Drop) Fruit Maturity Row Count

Survey Type Field Observations Laboratory Tests Field Observations

Crops Included Oranges excl. Navels

Grapefruit

Late tangerines

Oranges excl. Navels Oranges

Grapefruit

Late tangerines

Tangelos

Sample

Size

1561 groves 186 samples 143,200 rows

Collection 

Period

Jan 13-22 Jan 27-28 Jan 27-28

Test 

Period

Jan 29-Feb 1

Survey Overview

Florida Citrus
USDA-NASS

2-9-16

February 2016 Crop Production

% Change % Change

From From

Crop Unit February Previous Previous

2016 Forecast Season 

Production

Oranges Mil Tons 5.25 NC -17.8

Grapefruit Thou Tons 799 -1.5 -8.2

Tangelos Thou Tons 18.0 NC -41.9

Tangerines & 

Mandarins Thou Tons 911 +0.4 +8.1
USDA-NASS

2-9-16

February 2016 Crop Production

From From

February Previous Previous

2016 Forecast Season 

Production 

Sugarcane Mil Tons 33.0 +1.5 +8.6

Crop Unit 
USDA-NASS

2-9-16

Release Date Report Title

February 18 Farms and Land in Farms

February 19 Cattle on Feed

February 24 Crop Values

February 29 Agricultural Prices

March 1

CAIRS: Cotton System

CAIRS: Cotton System Annual

CAIRS: Fats & Oils

CAIRS: Fats & Oils Annual

CAIRS: Grain Crushings

CAIRS: Grain Crushings Annual

March 9 Cotton Ginnings

Crop Production

March 25 Hogs and Pigs

March 31 Prospective Plantings, Grain Stocks and Rice Stocks

Upcoming Reports
United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

202-720-2127

800-727-9540

nass@nass.usda.gov
Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

C.W. Gilluly, Chief Executive Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the "Company")
certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for year ended June 30, 2003 and
that to the best of his or her knowledge:

     1.   the report fully complies with the  requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.



November 7, 2003                          /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                          --------------------------
                                          C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                          Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.
333-32201, 333-32203, 333-40065, 333-20907, 333-20905, 333-63895. and 333-72237
on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-72643 and 333-50249 on Forms
S-3 of our reports dated February 2, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999
and 1998, and related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedules for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999,which appears in the December
31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc.

                                    KPMG LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
March 8, 2000