alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
                                                             EXHIBIT 11.1

                                                 BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

                                            COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                                                 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                         YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,               DECEMBER 31,
                                                      ------------------------       -----------------------
                                                          1995           1996          1995           1996
                                                       ---------     ---------       ---------     ---------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding                       4,424          4,473           4,473        4,883
Common Stock equivalents:
   Stock options granted                                     37             37              37           31
   Warrants granted                                          47             47              47           39
                                                        --------      --------        --------      --------
Weighted average number of shares used
in computing net income (loss) per share                  4,508          4,557           4,557        4,953
                                                        ========      ========        ========      ========
   Net income (loss)                                      $(424)          $553            $390      $(3,835)
                                                        ========      ========        ========      ========
   New income (loss per common shares                    $(0.09)         $0.12           $0.09       $(0.77)
                                                        ========      ========        ========      ========

</TABLE>
Order entered July 2 1 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00964

- CR

DONNIE CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from t he 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 16

- 71543

- M

O RDER

Before the Court is the State ’ s July 20, 2022 second motion for an extension

of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received

with the m otion filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41327

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JACOB MATTHEW MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:11-CR-1381-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jacob Matthew Martinez pleaded guilty to one count of interfering with 

commerce by threats or violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a). On 

remand, he was resentenced to 87 months of imprisonment, three years of 

supervised release, $223,627.40 in restitution, and a $100 special assessment.

As he did in his previous appeal, see United States v. Martinez, 614 F. 

App’x 165, 166 n.1 (5th Cir. 2015), Martinez contends that § 1951(a) is 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 29, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41327 Document: 00513776346 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
No. 15-41327

2

unconstitutional on its face and as applied to his case. He concedes that his 

arguments are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve the issues 

for further review.

The appeal was stayed pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Taylor 

v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2074 (2016). Taylor has now been decided, and the 

Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance asserting 

that Martinez’s arguments remain foreclosed by circuit precedent. In the 

alternative, the Government requests an extension of time in which to file a 

brief on the merits.

“Generally, the law of the case doctrine precludes reexamination by the 

appellate court on a subsequent appeal of an issue of law or fact decided on a 

previous appeal.” United States v. Agofsky, 516 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir. 2008). 

Because we rejected Martinez’s challenges to the constitutionality of § 1951(a) 

in his previous appeal, see Martinez, 614 F. App’x at 166 n.1, and none of the 

exceptions to the law of the case doctrine apply, see Agofsky, 516 F.3d at 283, 

the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the 

alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the 

district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-41327 Document: 00513776346 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
TS-FC12NT 

Attachment No. 001 

PMN Page 4 Section I.B.1.d and .e (Chemical Identity Information) 

Chemical Identity Information:

[

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

]

 ** COMPANY SANITIZED **
09:07 CITY OF MUSCLE SHOALS ~ 92563812915 

<!itp of Jmusrle .~boals 

DAVID H. BRADFORD 

MAYOR 

RICKY Wll.UAMS 

CITY CLERK·TRE:ASu,e:R 

October 24, 20l I 

. Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation 

DepwnnentofTrnnsportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

W f!Shington. DC 20590 

Re: Northwest All\bama Regional Air7n: ( .SL) 

BAS at Muscle ShoalS7 Alabama 

Docket DOT-OST-2000-7856 · 

DeacMr. DeVany: 

.: ~- - ' 

N0.145 

COUNCil.. ME.Me~: 

JAME:S HOLU.~D 

JERRY KNIGHT 

At..LEN N0!..£5 

JOE PAMPINTO 

NEAl. WILLI~ 

We have reviewed EAS proposals submitted under Pocket DOT-OST-2000-7856 from SeaPort Airlines, 

Inc. and Multi-Aero Inc .• dba Air Choice One for Muscle Shoals, Alabama. We have detennioed that the 

submitted proposals do not meet the current regulatory requirements necessary for the sustainment of 

viable air service at the Northwest Alabama Regional Ailpart (MSL). 

We appreciate the il\terest of these airlines, but do not endorse or St!pport these proposals for subsidized 

essential air service to the communities of Muscle Shoal~, Alabama. 

We respectfully request that hold-in order 2011-9-5 served September 13, 2011 that prohibited Mesaba & 

Pinnacle Airlines d/bla Delta Connection from terminating scheduled airline service to Muscle Shoals, 

Alabama remain in effect until fu~ notice, or until such time as a suitable replacement which .satisfies 

the community's needs can be found. · · • · 

We would like to thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. 

Mayor 

Cc; Northwest Alabama Regiotllll Airport Authoricy 

POST OFFICE BOX 2624 • MUSCLE SHOAI.S, ALABAMA 35G62 • (258) 383-5675 • FAX (256) 3B6-9201 

(;102 

·.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161

FROM: Scott Christian, Environmental Engineer, OAR/OTAQ/CISD

SUBJECT: Meeting notes for cellulosic biofuel waiver credits discussion

DATE: November 12, 2009

Location: EPA offices

Attendees:

On phone

Scott Christian, EPA

Jim Redding, Renewable Fuels Assn

Samantha Slater, Renewable Fuels Assn

Sandra Franco, Renewable Fuels Assn

Wes Golson, Coskata

Loula Merkel, Coskata

Eric Gockel NES Bio

Chris Hessler, representing Iogen

We discussed the invitee’s comments that were provided to the docket on the cellulosic biofuel 

waiver credits provision.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 2182** 

SABRINA RENEE BROWN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. PANTHER II TRANSPORTATION, INC., Panther Premium Logistics, Inc. , Defendant

- Appellee , and

HIRE RIGHT , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:16

- cv
- 00158

- RAJ

- DEM )

Submitted : December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016

Before GREGORY , Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Sabrina Renee Brown , Appellant Pro Se. Bryan K. Meals , DAVEY & BROGAN, PC , Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Sabrina Renee Brown appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action based on improper venue, declining
to transfer the action to another district, and denying her
motion to ame nd . Brown confines her appeal to the district

court’s dismissal of her a ction based on improper venue.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in that
ruling . Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Brown v . Panther II Transp., Inc. , No.

2:16

- cv
- 00158

- RAJ

- DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2016)

. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional pro cess.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00264-CV

HMC HELICOPTER SERVICE, INC. APPELLANT

V.

WEBSTER CAPITAL FINANCE 

F/K/A CENTER CAPITAL

CORPORATION

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellant's Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court=s 

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 29, 2011
**Exhibit 15.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-209069) on Form F-3 of Sumitomo MitsuiFinancial Group, Inc. of our reports dated June 23, 2017, with respect to the consolidated statement of financial position of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2017 and 2016, and the relatedconsolidated income statement and consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2017 and the effectiveness of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2017, which reports appear in the March 31, 2017 annual report on Form 20-F of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG AZSA LLC 

Tokyo, Japan 

June 29, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3050 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3050

     To remove limitations under Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, and the 
   Department of Veterans Affairs on benefits for persons in custody 
                    pending disposition of charges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 21, 2021

   Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Brown, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
 Booker, Mr. Padilla, and Ms. Baldwin) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To remove limitations under Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, and the 
   Department of Veterans Affairs on benefits for persons in custody 
                    pending disposition of charges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equity in Pretrial Health Coverage 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF INMATE LIMITATION ON BENEFITS UNDER MEDICAID, 
              MEDICARE, CHIP, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) Medicaid.--The subdivision (A) of section 1905(a) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)) that follows paragraph (31) is 
amended by inserting ``or in custody pending disposition of charges'' 
after ``patient in a medical institution''.
    (b) Medicare.--Section 1862(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395y(a)(3)) is amended by inserting ``in the case of services 
furnished to individuals who are in custody pending disposition of 
charges,'' after ``1880(e),''.
    (c) CHIP.--Section 2110(b)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1397jj(b)(2)(A)) is amended by inserting ``(except as an 
individual in custody pending disposition of charges)'' after ``inmate 
of a public institution''.
    (d) Modification of Inmate Limitation on Health Care Benefits From 
Department of Veterans Affairs.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
shall modify section 17.38(c)(5) of title 38, Code of Federal 
Regulations, or successor regulations, to ensure that the exclusion of 
veterans who are inmates from eligibility for health care from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs under such section does not apply to 
veterans who are in custody pending disposition of charges.
    (e) Effective Dates.--
            (1) In general.--The amendments made by subsections (a), 
        (b), and (c) shall take effect on the 1st day of the 1st 
        calendar quarter that begins more than 60 days after the date 
        of enactment of this Act and shall apply to items and services 
        furnished for periods beginning on or after such date.
            (2) Department of veterans affairs.--Subsection (d) shall 
        take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: February 14, 2008 | /s/ John P. Manning        
|----------------------- | ---------------------------
|                        | John P. Manning            
|                        | Principal Executive Officer
NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.

                                  Exhibit 23.2

                           Independent Auditors' Consent
<PAGE>
   

                       INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
NeoMedia Technologies, Inc:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-42477) on Form S-8 of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March
12, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of NeoMedia Technologies,
Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the "Company") as of December
31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash
flows and stockholders' equity for the years then ended, which report appears in
the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-KSB of NeoMedia Technologies,
Inc.

Our report dated March 12, 1999 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a
significant accumulated deficit, and working capital deficiency which raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/   KPMG LLP
---------------
KPMG LLP

Miami, Florida
April 15, 1999
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**PATRICIA WRIGHT,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**MISTY MOUNTAIN FARM, LLC AND**

**SHIRLEY MATTHEWS AND DEAN BUCK,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 38 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER****Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350****As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     I, Lewis A. Raibley, III, Chief FinancialOfficer of NYMEX Holdings, Inc., hereby certify, to myknowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2004 of NYMEX Holdings, Inc, Inc.(the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of NYMEX Holdings,Inc.
Dated: May 7, 2004
/s/ LEWIS A. RAIBLEY, IIIName:  Lewis A. Raibley, IIITitle:   Chief Financial Officer         (PrincipalFinancial Officer)
1
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00397-CR

NO. 02-16-00398-CR

ANTHONY DAVID GALVAN APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1439829, 1439830

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeals.” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 1, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07063]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury will submit the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, on or after the date of 
publication of this notice.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before April 27, 2015 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other 
aspect of the information collection, including suggestions for 
reducing the burden, to (1) Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for 
Treasury, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 
20503, or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#37787e6576686442555a5e44445e585977787a751972786719505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="014e4853405e5274636c687272686e6f414e4c432f444e512f666e77">[email protected]</span></a> and (2) Treasury PRA 
Clearance Officer, 1750 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 8140, Washington, 
DC 20220, or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4212100302363027233137303b6c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a6a687b7a4e485f5b494f4843145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the submission may be 
obtained by emailing <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eebebcafae9a9c8b8f9d9b9c97c0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="18484a59586c6a7d796b6d6a61367f776e">[email protected]</span></a>, calling (202) 927-5331, or 
viewing the entire information collection request at www.reginfo.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Bureau of the Fiscal Service (FS)

    OMB Number: 1530--New.
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Title: Analysis to Support Electronic Funds Transfer and Remittance 
Mandate.
    Abstract: The Bureau of the Fiscal Service is proposing to amend 
regulations (31 CFR part 206) that would require the public to make 
non-tax payments and remittances using electronic methods. This 
collection will inform and benefit economic analyses required by EO 
12866 and 5 U.S.C. 601-612 and support development of a Notice of 
Public Rulemaking.
    Affected Public: Individuals or Households.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 330.

    Dated: March 24, 2015.
Dawn D. Wolfgang,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-07063 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>