alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Linens Holding Co.,Linens ’n Things, Inc. andLinens ’n Things Center, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Robert J. DiNicola, as Chief Executive Officer of Linens Holding Co.,Linens ’n Things, Inc. andLinens ’n Things Center, Inc., and Francis M. Rowan, as Chief FinancialOfficer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Linens HoldingCo., Linens ’n Things, Inc.and Linens ’n Things Center, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ Robert J. DiNicola |                |
|------------------------|---------------------|
| **Name:**              | Robert J. DiNicola  |
| **Title:**             | Chairman and Chief  |
| ** **             | Executive Officer   |
| **Date:**              | March 20, 2008 |
|                        |                     |  |

 

 
| /s/ Francis M. Rowan |                       |
|----------------------|----------------------------|
| **Name:**            | Francis  M. Rowan          |
| **Title:**           | Senior  Vice President and |
| ** **           | Chief  Financial Officer   |
| **Date:**            | March 20, 2008        |
|                      |                            |  |

 

1

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131469 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131469 

 COA: 258821 

Oakland CC: 2004-196385-FC 

ONDRE QUINTRELL HULING, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32



Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mitchell
Steinhause as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Kenneth D. Shifrin, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.





Date:  August 8, 2005



By:

/s/    MITCHELL
STEINHAUSEName:

Mitchell SteinhauseTitle:

Chairman (Principal Executive
Officer)




Date:  August 8,
2005



By:

/s/    KENNETH D.
SHIFRINName:

Kenneth D. ShifrinTitle:

Controller (Principal Financial
Officer)
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Jean
Perrotti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.       the
Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.       the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:  Date:
      March 12, 2010
                    
                    /s/
      Jean PerrottiName:  Jean
      PerrottiTitle:
      Chief Financial OfficerAnd
      Principle Accounting
Officer
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43989

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DAKOTA JAMES McKEETH,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 810

Filed: December 8, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of two years, for attempted robbery, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Dakota James McKeeth pled guilty to attempted robbery. Idaho Code §§ 18-6501, 18-

306. The district court sentenced McKeeth to a unified term of ten years with two years 

determinate, and retained jurisdiction Following the period of retained jurisdiction, the district 

court relinquished jurisdiction. McKeeth appeals asserting that the district court abused its 

discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, McKeeth’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

288 

CAF 10-00644 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF STEUBEN COUNTY SUPPORT 

COLLECTION UNIT AND JUDITH A. ROSE, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

 

V ORDER

NEIL T. KELLY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

ROSEMARIE RICHARDS, SOUTH NEW BERLIN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

ALAN P. REED, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BATH (RUTH A. CHAFFEE OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Peter

C. Bradstreet, J.), entered March 2, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 4. The order determined, inter alia, that

respondent had willfully failed to obey an order of the court. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Matter of Hess v Flint, 5 AD3d 1079). 

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Governor tours coastal towns damaged by widespread flooding
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/31/Images/ng-seal-100px.png?ver=-moB4lJJKI-S1cDnzaUlfw%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Governor tours coastal towns damaged by widespread flooding</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div><b>By Oregon National Guard</b> <span class="date">/ Published Dec. 4, 2007</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>SALEM, Ore. - Oregon Gov. Theodore R. Kulongoski and other state officials visited coastal towns in the northwest part of the state hit hard by widespread flooding.</p>
<p>They arrived in Vernonia, Ore., via an Oregon Army National Guard UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter, and spoke with residents and town officials affected by heavy rains which pounded the Oregon coast Dec. 2 and 3.</p>
<p>"I will make requests to FEMA, and get a hold of a Congressional delegation, because (recovery efforts) will be ongoing," the governor said, during a press conference held at the Oregon Army National Guard aviation facility following the group's return to Salem.</p>
<p>Both the governor, and Brig. Gen. Mike Caldwell, deputy director, State Affairs for the Oregon National Guard, lauded the quick response of local and state agencies. They pointed to the recent inter-agency emergency exercise, TOPOFF 4, held in mid-October, in helping prepare rescue and relief agencies for such a disaster.</p>
<p>The Oregon National Guard in particular, said the governor, is very good at conducting relief efforts.</p>
<p>"But now we're doing a great job at recovery," he added.</p>
<p>Several Oregon National Guard units are currently dispersed throughout the hardest-hit communities on the Oregon coast, helping with relief efforts.</p><br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Xinhua  China  LTD.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Xianping Wang,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 18, 2009



                                       By: /s/ XIANPING WANG
                                           _____________________________________
                                               Xianping Wang
                                               President/Chief Executive Officer
1

BECKHAM, LISA

From: Steve Burr <Burr.Steven@azdeq.gov>

Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 12:01 PM

To: Mays, Rory; 'Michael Sundblom'; 'Scott DiBiase'; kale.walch@pinalcountyaz.gov;

Wehling, Jefferson; BECKHAM, LISA

Cc: Danielle M. Dancho; Trevor Baggiore

Subject: Draft NSR SIP Revision Supplement re Jurisdiction

Attachments: 19840206 Ltr to La Paz County re continued ADHS administration.pdf; 140425 EPA 

Review Draft NSR SIP Supplement-ADEQ and County Jurisdiction.doc

Attached for your review and comment is a draft supplement to the 2012 ADEQ NSR SIP that provides a detailed 

description the division of jurisdiction over NSR. 

To address Lisa’s concerns, it also includes a discussion in section 2.4 at page 6 of how the submitted SIP revision 

provides for enforcement of current federal NSR requirements in Pinal County, which obviates the need to issue a 

finding of failure to submit a SIP revision for Pinal County addressing PM2.5 increments. 

Jeff: We searched our file logs and were only able to find only one document relating to state jurisdiction in La Paz, 

Greenlee or Graham County—the attached 1994 letter from ADHS to La Paz. The letter states that since La Paz has 

shelved efforts to develop its own air quality program, ADHS “will continue the inspections, permitting and other 

functions related to air pollution control in La Paz County required under State and Federal Law.” The letter does not 

formally assert jurisdiction under 36-1706 or refer to any previous assertion of jurisdiction. 

I reviewed Chapter 9 of the 1972 SIP and did not think there was anything in it that needed to be addressed in this 

supplement.
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation| Diamond BlackHawk EGOM PSD/Title V Permit Application 129 

Trinity Consultants

A	summary	of	the	proposed	PM/PM10/PM2.5	BACT	emission	limitation	for	each	source	associated	with	the	

project	is	provided	below	in	Table	5‐20.	

Table 5‐20. Proposed PM/PM10/PM2.5BACT Emission Limits

Emission Unit BACT Emission Limit BACT Basis BACT Control

Technologies

Drillship	Main	Diesel	Engines		

(DR‐ME‐01	thru	DR‐ME‐06)	

PM/PM10/PM2.5 –

2.47E‐04	lb/Hp‐hr		

(0.15	g/KW‐hr)	

NSPS	IIII	

Standards	

NSPS	IIII	standards,	

LNE	design	including	

Turbocharger	with	

Aftercooler	and	High	

Fuel	Pressure	

Injection,	ULSD	and	

Good	Combustion	

Practices	

Drillship	Emergency	Diesel	

Engine	(DR‐GE‐01)	

‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	3,	

Table	3.4‐1	

LNE	design,	ULSD	and	

Good	Combustion	

Practices	

Air	Compressor	Diesel	Engine	

(DR‐AC‐01)	

‐‐ 40	CFR	89	EPA

Tier	2	Standard	

ULSD,	EPA	Tier	2

Standard	

Good	Combustion	

Practices	

Third	Party	Engines	(DR‐TP‐01	

through	DR‐TP‐11	and	DR‐TP‐17	

through	DR‐TP‐21)	

‐‐ 40	CFR	89	EPA	

Tier	2	Standard	

40	CFR	89	EPA	Tier	2	

Standard	and	LNE	

design	

Third	Party	Well	Evaluation	

Engines	(DR‐TP‐12	through	DR‐

TP‐16)	

‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	3,	

Table	3.3‐1	

Good	Combustion	

Practices	

Stimulation	Vessel	Pumps	(SV‐

PE‐01	thru	SV‐PE‐08)	

‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	3,	

Table	3.4‐1	

Good	Combustion	

Practices	

Flowback	Boiler	(DR‐WC‐05)	 ‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	1,	

Table	1.3‐1	

Good	Combustion	

Practices	

Boom	Flare	(DR‐WC‐06)	 ‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	1,	

Table	1.4‐2	

Compliance	with	40	

CFR	60.18	and	Good	

Combustion	Practices	

Cement	and	Mud	Mixing	

Operations	(DR‐DC‐01	thru		

DR‐DC‐03)	

‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	11,	

Table	11.12‐2	

Dust	Collectors

Painting	Operations	(DR‐PO‐01)	 ‐‐ Paint	Composition	 Best	Management	

Practices	

Welding	Operations	(DR‐WO‐01)	 ‐‐ AP‐42,	Chapter	12,	

Table	12.19‐1	

Best	Management	

Practices
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document











































 
 

  Exhibit 10.1    
    


April 30,
2013 


William
C. Lucia

HMS Holdings Corp.

5615 High Point Drive

Irving, Texas 75038 



Dear
Bill: 


        You
and HMS Holdings Corp. (the "Company") are parties to an employment agreement effective as of March 1, 2013 that sets forth
certain terms of your employment with the Company (the "Employment Agreement"). You and the Company have agreed to certain amendments to the Employment
Agreement. Except as set forth below, your Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 



        1.     The
pre-amendment Employment Agreement provided that if your employment is terminated due to death, the termination of your employment will be treated as
termination without Cause under Section 6(b) or 6(c). You and the Company have agreed to remove the possibility of severance benefits upon your death. 




        Consistent
with the foregoing, Section 6(e) of the Employment Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows: 




"Death or Disability. The Executive's employment hereunder will terminate immediately upon his (i) death or (ii) Separation from Service
due to Disability. "Disability" means the Company, based on appropriate medical evidence, determines he has become physically or mentally incapacitated
so as to render him incapable of performing his usual and customary duties, with or without a reasonable accommodation, for 180 or more days, whether or not consecutive, during any 12 month
period. The Executive is also disabled if he is found to be disabled within the meaning of the Company's long-term disability insurance coverage as then in effect (or would be so found if
he applied for such coverage or benefits). Employment termination due to Disability is treated as termination without Cause under Section 6(b) or 6(c) as applicable. Nothing in this Section
prevents the Board from removing the Executive from his position as CEO or, under Section 6(b), (c), or (d), from terminating his employment at any time, subject to compliance with those
subsections when applicable." 




        2.     The
other provisions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. 



 
 

  Signatures on Page Following    
    







 






					
	Sincerely,	 	 
	

HMS Holdings Corp.	
 	

 
	
 By:	
 	
/s/ ROBERT M. HOLSTER







  Robert M. Holster
  Chairman of the Board of Directors 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

 



 

         I
have carefully read this amendment, understand the contents herein, freely and voluntarily assent to all of the terms and conditions hereof, and sign my name of my own free act. 

 






					
	 
	 	 
	 	 

	
 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	/s/ WILLIAM C. LUCIA






  William C. Lucia	 	 	 	Date: April 30, 2013




 

 








QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.1


Signatures on Page Following
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0180

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DOUGLAS BAERTSCH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an 

extension of time to and including January 2, 2024, within which to 

prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 27 2023

11/27/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0180
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9076]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Byzantium to Russia, the Origins and Development of 
Russian Icons 1200 to 1900'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Byzantium to Russia, the origins and 
development of Russian Icons 1200 to 1900,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Russian Icons, Clinton, 
Massachusetts, from on or about May 2, 2015, until on or about August 
22, 2015, at the Chrysler Museum of Art, Norfolk, Virginia, from on or 
about September 5, 2015, until on or about January 31, 2016, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including the 
list of the exhibit objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy and 
Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of 
State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9cadcdacdd0d6d78b8d8c80f9cacdd8cddc97ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0d3c5c3d4c9cfce92949599e0d3d4c1d4c58ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 27, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-07693 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
M10007 CAS Name

Confidential Information Removed