alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Michigan professor-Airman serves with pride

/ Published Dec. 29, 2016

SELFRIDGE AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, Mich. — Of the 1,269 enlisted airmen in the 127th Wing here, the college education statistics break down roughly like this: a lot, a few, a handful and one. 

A lot of enlisted airmen here – 253 to be exact -- have earned associate degrees, either through the Community College of the Air Force or other sources. A few – 86 - have bachelor's degrees. A handful – 21- have master's degrees. And one has a doctorate. 

 Air Force Master Sgt. Shaun West is the "one."

 "I felt the challenge was necessary," said West, a member of the 127th Security Forces Squadron. 

 West holds the following degrees: 

 - Associate degree in criminal justice from the CCAF

 - Bachelor of science in counseling psychology from Rochester College

 - Master of arts in counseling from Oakland University

 - Two post-master's degree certificates in counseling-related specialties, also from Oakland University

 - Doctor of behavioral health degree, with a specialization in integrated care management, from Arizona State University. 

**A Call to Serve**

 "I really didn't join the military for the educational benefits," West said. "In fact, due to the timing of some of my classes, I missed out on some of the new, better benefits that the state has now. I really joined the Air National Guard because I felt called to serve. I wanted to serve the American population, and for me, I get to do that both in uniform and now in a classroom." 

 West enlisted in the 127th Wing in 2002 and served as a member of the security forces squadron for about 10 years. His civilian career then led him to the west side of Michigan, and he transferred to the 110th Attack Wing in Battle Creek, where he retrained and served as a member of the 110th Medical Group's bio-environmental office. In 2014, he returned to the Detroit area and rejoined the 127th security forces squadron. 

 After he worked in a variety of positions as a counselor and therapist in his civilian career, West said, two new opportunities emerged for him. First, after finishing his doctorate, he was invited by Arizona State to serve as a part-time professor in the university's online graduate program. He now teaches classes on population health management. About the same time, he was able to take a full-time position with the security forces squadron here. 

 "I really see that as two different types of service," West said. "I enjoy both equally." 

 The professor-Airman is pondering his next challenges, possibly to include another master's degree to help him better understand how different conditions affect different groups. "That's information that applies both to mental health care and to law enforcement work," he explained.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                    Washington, D.C. 20549

                            FORM 8-K
                         CURRENT REPORT

                 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 28, 1998


                    SMITH CORONA CORPORATION
     (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


DELAWARE                      1-10281                  51-0286862
--------                      -------                  ----------
(State or other jurisdiction (Commission         (I.R.S. Employer
  of incorporation)           File Number)    Identification No.)


             839 Route 13 South, Cortland, New York 13045
        (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

                         (607) 753-6011
       (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)




Item 4.	Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant

DESCRIPTION OF TRANSACTION

	On September 17, 1998, the Smith Corona Corporation Board of Directors 
and audit committee approved KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as its independent 
public accountants for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1999.  KPMG Peat 
Marwick LLP will replace Deloitte & Touche LLP upon completion of the 
audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements for the fiscal 
year ended June 30, 1998.

	The audit reports of Deloitte & Touche LLP on the Company's consolidated 
financial statements for the two fiscal years ended June 30, 1998 and 1997 did 
not contain any adverse or disclaimers of opinion.  The opinion for the year 
ended June 30, 1997, did contain an emphasis of a matter relating to the 
successful implementation of the Company's reorganization plan upon emergence 
from bankruptcy.

	In connection with the audits of the Company's consolidated financial 
statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, and the subsequent
interim period through September 28, 1998, there were no disagreements with 
Deloitte & Touche LLP on any matters of accounting principles or practices, 
financial statements disclosure, or auditing scope and procedures.

				SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.









                         					SMITH CORONA CORPORATION




September 29, 1998


                        					By: /s/ Martin D. Wilson
                        					Martin D. Wilson
                         				Vice President/Controller
                          		(Principal Accounting Officer) 
Exhibit Index

16 Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding change in Certifying 
Accountants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         6,710,246
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      68,483
<MORTGAGE>                                     566,403
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      633
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               7,684,769
<CASH>                                          60,090
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               6,174
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         246,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,428,810
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              7,185,417
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  13,433
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           95,974
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                141,051
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          216,729
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,426
<OTHER-SE>                                     819,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,428,810
<PREMIUMS>                                     152,301
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            506,949
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (112)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                     430,756
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     60,214
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            81,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,597
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,422
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             62,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.86
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10868

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Briant Lane, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-106-1

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Briant Lane has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Lane has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10868 Document: 00516282755 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2022
No. 21-10868

2

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-10868 Document: 00516282755 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2022
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofNUI Corporation (the "company") for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),I, Craig G. Matthews, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, andI, Dan Scouler, Interim Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1)       thereport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2)       theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
```
 
```

    /s/ Craig G. Matthews                                       /s/ Dan Scouler      Craig G. Matthews                                             Dan Scouler          Presidentand                                   Interim Chief Financial Officer      Chief ExecutiveOfficer                                       June 17, 2004          June 17, 2004                                    

**               **

A signed copy of this written statement required bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the company. Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the company, whether made before orafter the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in suchfiling.
```
 
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Jerome R Mahoney,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        Date: August 14, 2007

                                        By /s/ Jerome R Mahoney
                                        --------------------------
                                        Jerome R Mahoney
                                        President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.2

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
NeoMedia Technologies, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (Nos.333-42477 and 333-80591) of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. of our
report dated March 12, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the
"Company") as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, cash flows and stockholders' equity for the year then ended, which
report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB of NeoMedia
Technologies, Inc.

Our report dated March 12, 1999 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a
significant accumulated deficit, and a working capital deficiency which raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/   KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP

Miami, Florida
March 29, 2000

                                       E-2
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick J. Caruso, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |    
|Date: January 26, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    NICK J.
CARUSO                                              
|                       |  |     |  | Nick J. Caruso Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynegy Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Dynegy Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016171EN.01000601.xml

| 12.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/6

---

Calls for proposals under the work programme for grants in the field of the trans-European telecommunication networks under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020

(Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 1225)

(2016/C 171/07)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, is hereby launching four calls for proposals in order to award grants to projects in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the work programme for 2016 in the field of the trans-European telecommunication networks under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020.

Proposals are invited for the following four calls:

| | CEF-TC-2016-2: eDelivery |
| --- | --- |

CEF-TC-2016-2: eDelivery

| | CEF-TC-2016-2: eIdentification & eSignature |
| --- | --- |

CEF-TC-2016-2: eIdentification & eSignature

| | CEF-TC-2016-2: European e-Justice Portal |
| --- | --- |

CEF-TC-2016-2: European e-Justice Portal

| | CEF-TC-2016-2: Public Open Data |
| --- | --- |

CEF-TC-2016-2: Public Open Data

The total indicative budget available for proposals selected under these calls is EUR 10,5 million.

The deadline for the submission of proposals is 15 September 2016.

15 September 2016

The respective calls documentation is available on the CEF Telecom website: https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-telecom/apply-funding/2016-cef-telecom-calls-proposals

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STACIA VICK and CHADWICK §

VICK, §

§ No. 491, 2018

Plaintiffs Below, §

Appellants, § Court Below: Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. K17C-09-007

DR. NASREEN KHAN, KHAN §

AND ASSOCIATES, P.A., §

BAYHEALTH INC., BAYHEALTH §

MEDICAL CENTER, and KENT §

GENERAL HOSPITAL, §

§

Defendants Below, §

Appellees. §

Submitted: December 20, 2018

 Decided: February 21, 2019

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

(1) The plaintiffs-appellants seek interlocutory review of the Superior 

Court’s bench ruling of January 5, 2018 and the court’s order of August 22, 2018 in 

the plaintiffs’ medical negligence action. The January 5, 2018 bench ruling 

dismissed Counts III through VIII of the plaintiffs’ complaint as time-barred. The 
2

August 22, 2018 order affirmed a Commissioner’s order denying the plaintiffs’ 

motion to amend the complaint.

1

 

(2) By order dated September 19, 2018, the Superior Court denied the 

plaintiffs’ application for certification of an interlocutory appeal after finding that

neither the January 5 bench ruling nor the August 22 order determined a substantial 

issue of material importance meriting appellate review before final judgment. 

(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 

discretion of this Court and are granted only in exceptional circumstances.2 In the 

exercise of our discretion, we conclude that the plaintiffs’ application for

interlocutory review does not meet the strict standards for certification under 

Supreme Court Rule 42. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal is 

REFUSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice 

 

1

2018 WL 4026692 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 22, 2018).

2 Del. Sup. Ct. R. 42(d)(v).
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Valerie Knowles, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>North Clinton Associates, A Partnership, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County, Second District (James F. Matthews, J.), entered March 11, 2015. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $4,060 and dismissed defendant's counterclaim.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Plaintiff commenced this small claims action against defendant, her former landlord, to recover her security deposit in the amount of $4,060. Defendant counterclaimed, insofar as relevant to this appeal, for damages allegedly due under the lease for the period after defendant purportedly terminated the lease. After a nonjury trial, the District Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $4,060 and dismissed defendant's counterclaim. On appeal, defendant contends that, after it terminated the lease, based on plaintiff's improper conduct, plaintiff was liable pursuant to the cancellation clause of the lease for two months of rent in the amount of $2,800, representing the time between when plaintiff vacated the premises and a new tenant began to pay rent, and for a rent concession to the new tenant, which was in the amount of $1,000. Thus, defendant contends, the award to plaintiff should be reduced by the total sum of $3,800.</p><p>In our view, defendant fails to show that "substantial justice has not been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (UDCA 1807; <i>see</i> UDCA 1804; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000]). The record establishes that, subsequent to its purported termination of the lease and before plaintiff vacated, defendant accepted the following month's rent from plaintiff, thus vitiating its notice of termination (<a href="../2015/2015_25282.htm" target="_blank"><i>see e.g. 92 Bergenbrooklyn, LLC v Cisarano</i>, 50 Misc 3d 21</a> [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]). Under the circumstances, defendant cannot recover pursuant to the lease's cancellation clause.</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>Marano, P.J., Iannacci and Garguilo, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: December 07, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3162 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3162

   To clarify the authority of States to use National Guard members 
    performing Active Guard and Reserve duty during State-directed 
                    responses to domestic incidents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 3, 2021

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To clarify the authority of States to use National Guard members 
    performing Active Guard and Reserve duty during State-directed 
                    responses to domestic incidents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard Emergency Response 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF STATES TO USE NATIONAL GUARD MEMBERS PERFORMING 
              ACTIVE GUARD AND RESERVE DUTY DURING STATE-DIRECTED 
              RESPONSES TO DOMESTIC INCIDENTS.

    Section 328(b) of title 32, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``A member''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) Under regulations prescribed by the Chief of the National 
Guard Bureau, the adjutant general of the jurisdiction concerned may 
authorize a member of the National Guard performing duty under 
subsection (a) to perform additional duties in response to a State-
declared emergency or disaster provided that the adjutant general 
determines that members performing such additional duties will derive a 
benefit that satisfies or complements training requirements for the 
wartime mission or other training objectives of the members' unit.''.
                                 <all>
```