alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
SPACEHAB, Incorporated:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-3634, 333-36779, 333-43159, and 333-43181) on Form S-8 and the registration
statement (No. 333-43221) on Form S-3 of SPACEHAB, Incorporated of our report
dated August 13, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of SPACEHAB,
Incorporated and subsidiary as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1999 which report
appears in the June 30, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K of SPACEHAB,
Incorporated.


                                                                        KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
September 16, 1999
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7997
RICHARD LEE COOK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROY CHERRY, Superintendent; DAVID SIMONS, Assistant Superintendent; LUIS IGNACIO, Jail Psychiatrist, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CA-04-974-1) Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 17, 2005 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Lee Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Richard Lee Cook seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action in part. Cook’s claim against Defendant Luis Ignacio remains pending in the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Cook seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheets  and  consolidated  statements  of  income  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997 
<CASH>                                           937,563
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    297,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,448,970
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0 
<PP&E>                                         8,593,160 
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                14,937,306 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                    10,162,708 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  14,937,306 
<SALES>                                          296,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,571,788
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,864,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 445,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 250,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               204,377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,707,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,707,262 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,707,262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       5.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       5.25
        


</TABLE>
P.1 

OAR Box 1867 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

22) ll-B-76 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/2/2008 6:27:20 AM Sheet 22 of 95 
P.2 

A-90-19 

ll-B-76 

PENDING CONFIDEN 

The following information is located in the confidential 

files of the Director, Emission Standards Division, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. This 

information is confidential pending final determination by the 

Administrator and is not available for public inspection. 

W. Floyd, Radian Corporation, to Process Vents Docket 

A-90-19, January 1991, HON NESHAP: Industry 

Characteristics/Ketene. 24 pages. 

CBI Document Control No. 86/23, PPS-76.
##### 



Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 20-F of Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero)
PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk. (the Company)
for the yearly period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kristiono, President Director of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:



| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kristiono




Name: Kristiono


Title:   President Director


Date:  February 9, 2004
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 18
- 00266
- CR ALEC NAVA , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017
- 2080
- C2

A B A T E M E N T ORDER
On January 3, 2019, Alex Nava’s retained counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California and a motion to withdraw stating that after “a professional evaluation of the record in this case and a thorough review of applicable law, [counsel] has reached the conclusion that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced to support an appeal and the appeal is frivolous under the standards applied in Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1967).” On June 5, 2019, this Court entered an OrderN ava v. State Page 2

allowing Nava’s retained counsel to withdraw. The Order required Nava within 30 days
from the date of the Order to 1) retain new counsel, 2) take other action showing his desire to pursue his appeal, including but not limited to requesting the appointment of another attorney if he cannot afford one, or 3) notify this Court that he no longer de sires to pursue his appeal. On June 12, 2019, Nava notified this Court that he wants to continue his appeal and that he would like appointed counsel. We abate this appeal to the trial court to hold a hearing within 30 days of the date of this Ord er to det ermine whether Nava is entitled
to receive a court

- appointed attorney, and if so, to appoint new counsel on appeal. The supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records, if any, are ordered to be filed within 45 d ays of the date of this Order.

PER CURIAM
Befo re Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Appeal abated Order issued and filed July 9, 2019 Do not publish [RWR]
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into effective the 29th day of April, 2013 by and between The GEO Group, Inc., a Florida
Corporation, (the “Company”) and George C. Zoley (the “Executive”). 
 WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive (collectively the “Parties”) have previously entered into
the Third Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement effective as of August 22nd, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties
wish to amend the Employment Agreement as provided herein to employ the Executive in accordance with the provisions herein. 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other valuable consideration the
receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 
 1. The second and third sentences
of Section 4.A. of the Employment Agreement are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “The Company may, from time to time and in the sole discretion of the Board, increase the Annual Base Salary paid to the Executive for cost of living increase(s) to be determined by the Board.”

 2. Paragraph 7.A.(i) of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“TERMINATION PAYMENT. The Executive shall be entitled to and paid a termination payment (the “Termination
Payment”) equal to two (2) times the sum of (a) Executive’s Annual Base Salary at the time of such termination and (b) the Executive’s target bonus (the “Target Bonus”) under the Company’s Senior
Management Performance Award Plan (or any successor plan) for the fiscal year in which his employment is terminated or, if greater, the Target Bonus for the fiscal year immediately prior to such termination. The Termination Payment shall be made
within 10 days of any termination pursuant to this Section 7(A).” 
 Except as otherwise specifically
amended herein, the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment
under seal as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	THE GEO GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Richard H. Glanton
	Name:	 	Richard H. Glanton
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Compensation Committee


 
			
	
	EXECUTIVE 
		
	By:	 	/s/ George C. Zoley
	Name:	 	George C. Zoley



  
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
unaudited financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2000 that were
filed  with the company's report on Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by  regeference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         1
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Jean C. Compas, as Assignee of Roseline Amusu Garcia, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Infinity Group, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered November 6, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>Plaintiff commenced this action to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits for medical services provided to its assignor for injuries that she had sustained in a motor vehicle accident on May 19, 2011. Defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, arguing that a conflict of law analysis required the application of Pennsylvania law. Defendant asserted that, under Pennsylvania law, there was a lack of coverage based on the cancellation of the underlying Pennsylvania insurance policy on May 12, 2011, due to the nonpayment of a premium. Plaintiff opposed the motion. By order entered November 6, 2014, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion, finding that there was no coverage for the claims since "[d]efendant established the underlying Pennsylvania policy was properly cancelled before the date of the accident herein." On appeal, plaintiff argues, among other things, that defendant's motion should have been denied because defendant failed to establish that the notice of cancellation had been properly mailed.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <a href="../2015/2015_51880.htm" target="_blank"><i>New Way Med. Supply Corp. v Infinity Group</i> (50 Misc 3d 128</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51880[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]), the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>Aliotta, J.P., Pesce and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: December 07, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Jerome R Mahoney,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                          Date: May 15, 2007

                                          By /s/ Jerome R Mahoney
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Jerome R Mahoney
                                          President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTIANS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 1997.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                       543
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,361
<PP&E>                                           3,932
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,776
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           112
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,222
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,891
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (885)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,676
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,676
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14
PROMULGATED UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ William P. MoffittWilliam P. MoffittPresident and Chief Executive Officer
February Crop Production

Agricultural Statistics Board Briefing

Lance Honig, Chief

Crops Branch

February 8, 2023
Data Sources

February 8, 2023

Objective Measurement

Florida Citrus

Row Count

Florida Citrus

Utilization Florida Citrus Administrative Committee

Data Quantity of Fruit Packed or Processed

Field Surveys

1,534 Groves January 9-23

89,070 Rows January 24-25
February 8, 2023

February 2023 Citrus

Utilized Production

All Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↓ 3.3

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 24.7

Non-Valencia Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↓ 2.4

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 13.0

Valencia Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↓ 5.4

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 42.7

Grapefruit

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 13.4

Lemons

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 9.1

Tangerines

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↑ 23.5

Production

(1,000 Tons)

904

2,613

1,828

785

324

940

9.37 9.03 8.73

7.70

6.08

8.14 7.85

6.91

5.61

4.78

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Million Tons

All Citrus Production

United States

6.77

6.35

6.09

5.09

3.88

5.43 5.25

4.39

3.47

2.61

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Million Tons

All Orange Production

United States
February 8, 2023

2022 Field Crops

Acreage, Yield, and Production

Unit Unit

Sugarcane Ton Ton

% Change from Previous Estimate N/A ↓ 0.1 ↑ 1.1 ↑ 1.0

% Change from Previous Season N/A ↓ 0.8 ↑ 7.4 ↑ 6.6

N/A

Yield

(Units per Acre)

Harvested

(1,000 Acres)

Planted

(1,000 Acres)

Production

(1,000 Units)

928 37.7 35,011
Selected Upcoming Reports

February 8, 2023

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/index.php

February 17 Farms & Land in Farms

Cattle on Feed

Corn, Sorghum, & Soybean County Estimates

Crop Values

February 28 Agricultural Prices

Cotton System

Cotton System - Annual

Fats & Oils

Fats & Oils - Annual

Grain Crushings

March 3 Rice County Estimates

Cotton Ginnings

Crop Production

February 24

March 1

March 8
USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum

February 8, 2023

Register to Attend In-Person

Register to Attend Virtually Only
2022 Census of Agriculture

February 8, 2023
#StatChat

February 8, 2023
All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

(202) 720-2127

(800) 727-9540

nass@usda.gov