alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


              List of Subsidiaries of Medical Manager Corporation


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Company Name                                         Jurisdiction
------------                                         -------------
<S>                                                  <C>
Medical Manager Research &
   Development, Inc.                                 Florida

Systems Plus, Inc.                                   California

Systems Plus Distribution, Inc.                      California

Medical Manager RTI, Inc.                            New York

Medical Manager Southeast, Inc.                      Florida

Preferred System Solutions, Inc.                     
   (a wholly owned subsidiary of National 
   Medical Systems, Inc.)                            Oklahoma
 
Medical Manager Systems Management, Inc.             Indiana

</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3084 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to provide for the termination 

of telephone, multichannel video programming, and internet access service 

contracts by servicemembers after the receipt of stop movement orders 

due to an emergency situation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 27, 2021 

Ms. HASSAN (for herself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to provide 

for the termination of telephone, multichannel video programming, and internet access service contracts by 

servicemembers after the receipt of stop movement orders 

due to an emergency situation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Relief for 

5 Servicemembers Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3084 IS

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF TELEPHONE, MULTICHANNEL 

2 VIDEO PROGRAMMING, AND INTERNET AC3 CESS SERVICE CONTRACTS BY SERVICEMEM4 BERS WHO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS AFTER 

5 RECEIVING MILITARY ORDERS FOR PERMA6 NENT CHANGE OF STATION BUT THEN RE7 CEIVE STOP MOVEMENT ORDERS DUE TO AN 

8 EMERGENCY SITUATION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 305A(a)(1) of the 

10 Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3956 (a)(1)) 

11 is amended— 

12 (1) by striking ‘‘after the date the servicemem13 ber receives military orders to relocate for a period 

14 of not less than 90 days to a location that does not 

15 support the contract.’’ and inserting ‘‘after—’’; and 

16 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub17 paragraphs: 

18 ‘‘(A) the date the servicemember receives 

19 military orders to relocate for a period of not 

20 less than 90 days to a location that does not 

21 support the contract; or 

22 ‘‘(B) the date the servicemember, while in 

23 military service, receives military orders (as de24 fined in section 305(i)) for a permanent change 

25 of station (as defined in section 305(i)), there26 after enters into the contract, and then after 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3084 IS

1 entering into the contract receives a stop move2 ment order issued by the Secretary of Defense 

3 in response to a local, national, or global emer4 gency, effective for an indefinite period or for a 

5 period of not less than 30 days, which prevents 

6 the servicemember from using the services pro7 vided under the contract.’’. 

8 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—The amendments 

9 made by this Act shall apply to any stop movement order 

10 issued on or after March 1, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.19

 

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO A LEASE CONTRACT

 

Lessor: China Bioway Biotech Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Party A”)
 Legal Address: No. 39, Shangdi Xi Road, Haidian District, Beijing

 

Lessee: Beijing Sinovac R&D Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Party B”)
 Legal Address: No. 39, Shangdi Xi Road, Haidian District, Beijing

 

WHEREAS, Party A, Party B and Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Sinovac Beijing”) signed a lease contract on August 12, 2010, under which Party A leased its Section 3 of Research & Development Center located in the Peking University Biological Park at No. 39, Shangdi Xi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, which had been originally leased to Sinovac Beijing, to Party B for use (hereinafter referred to as the “Original Lease Contract”), and now Party A and Party B unanimously agree to enter into the following supplemental agreement regarding the change of the lease term set forth in the Original Lease Contract after mutual consultation:

 

1.              Both parties agree that the lease term set forth in the Original Lease Contract will be changed from April 8, 2013 to April 7, 2033.

 

2.              Party A undertakes that it will, during the useful life of the factory leased for use under the Original Lease Contract, continue to lease out the leased factory to Party B on the conditions specified in the Original Lease Contract and its supplemental agreement.

 

3.              This Agreement is an integral part of the Original Lease Contract and shall have the same legal force as the Original Lease Contact.  Save for any provisions agreed upon by both parties herein, the other provisions of the Original Lease Contract shall remain unchanged and be implemented in accordance with the Original Lease Contract.

 

4.              This Agreement shall become effective when it is signed and sealed by both parties.

 

5.              This Agreement is executed in two originals and both parties shall each keep one original.  All of them shall have the same legal force.

 

	
Party A:
    	
China Bioway Biotech Group Co., Ltd.
    [Chop of China Bioway Biotech Group Co., Ltd.]
    	
 
    	
Party B:
    	
Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd.
    [Chop of Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd.]
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Legal Representative:
    	
 
    	
/s/
    	
 
    	
Legal Representative:
    	
 
    	
/s/
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
(Authorized Representative)
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Authorized Representative
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
(Signature or seal)
    	
 
    	
 
    	
(Signature or seal)
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
April 8, 2013
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
April 8, 2013
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7998

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

STACY TREMAINE JOHNSON, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (7:00-cr-00114-F-1; 7:03-cv-00194-F) 

Submitted: March 31, 2009 Decided: April 28, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Stacy Tremaine Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Stacy Tremaine Johnson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2008) motion and denying his motions for reconsideration 

and for a certificate of appealability. The orders are not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
---

|SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|FORM 8-K                                                                                       
|CURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934           
|Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     February 28, 2005                         
|AZTAR CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)                        
|Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation)                                         
|2390 East Camelback Road, Suite 400,
Phoenix, Arizona 
(Address of principal executive offices)
|Registrant's telephone number, including area code  (602) 381-4100                             
|Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)                   
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               



---





|ITEM 1.01. | Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
|---------- | ------------------------------------------
|           | (a)                                       
|ITEM 9.01. | Financial Statements and Exhibits         
|           | (c)                                       
|           |                                           
|           |                                           



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

| | AZTAR CORPORATIONN.W. ARMSTRONG, JR.
Nelson W. Armstrong, Jr.
Vice President, Administration
and Secretary
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  March 1, 2005

EXHIBIT INDEX

|ExhibitNumber | Description                                                                                         
|------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|10.1          | Noncompete Agreement between Aztar Corporation and Paul E. Rubeli dated February 28, 2005.          
|10.2          | 409A Indemnification Agreement between Aztar Corporation and Paul E. Rubeli dated February 28, 2005.



2



---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 297 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government to regulate 

the labeling of products made in the United States and introduced 

in interstate or foreign commerce, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2021 

Mr. LEE (for himself and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government 

to regulate the labeling of products made in the United 

States and introduced in interstate or foreign commerce, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reinforcing American5 Made Products Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 297 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVITY OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY TO REGU2 LATE LABELING OF PRODUCTS MADE IN THE 

3 UNITED STATES AND INTRODUCED IN INTER4 STATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE. 

5 Section 320933 of the Violent Crime Control and 

6 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 45a) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘To the ex9 tent’’ and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—To the extent’’; 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) EFFECT ON STATE LAW.— 

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para14 graph (2), the provisions of this section shall super15 sede any provisions of the law of any State expressly 

16 relating to the extent to which a product is intro17 duced, delivered for introduction, sold, advertised, or 

18 offered for sale in interstate or foreign commerce 

19 with a ‘Made in the U.S.A.’ or ‘Made in America’ 

20 label, or the equivalent thereof, in order to represent 

21 that such product was in whole or substantial part 

22 of domestic origin. 

23 ‘‘(2) ENFORCEMENT.—Nothing in this section 

24 shall preclude the application of the law of any State 

25 to the use of a label not in compliance with sub26 section (a).’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 297 IS

1 (3) in the third sentence of subsection (a), as 

2 so designated by paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Noth3 ing in this section’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as pro4 vided in subsection (b), nothing in this section’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07663]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 30, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Foresight Financial Group, Inc., Rockford, Illinois; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of State Bank of Herscher, Herscher, 
Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 31, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-07663 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Commonwealth v. Thalheimer.

*Impersonating officer*— Act *of May 5,1897.*

Under the Act of May 5, 1897, P. L. 39, an Indictment will not lie for impersonating a “revenue officer.” This act applies only to officers of the State or a division thereof.

Demurrer. Indictment for impersonating officer. Q. S. Lancaster Co., Jan. Sess., 1922, No. 9.

*John M. Groff,*for demurrer.

*William C. Rehm,*District Attorney, contra.

March 25, 1922.

Landis, P. J.,

The indictment in this case charges that, on or about Sept. 21, 1921, Emanuel Thalheimer “did unlawfully, falsely and deceitfully represent himself to be a revenue officer.” The demurrer is based upon the ground that the charge does not fall within the provisions of the Act of Assembly punishing such persons as represent themselves to be officers of the Commonwealth or a division thereof.

The Act of May 5, 1897, P. L. 39, provides that, “on and after the passage of this act, every person within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who falsely represents himself to be, or who falsely assumes to act as, a detective, or any elective or appointive officer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, or of any county, municipality, city, borough, township, district or ward within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.” A revenue officer is neither a detective nor an elective or appointive officer of the State or any division of the State, and he does not fall within the words of this act. A somewhat similar case arose in Lehigh County. There the defendant was indicted under this same act for representing himself as a census enumerator. Trexler, P. J., held that, as penal statutes are to be construed strictly, the words “elective or appointive,” as used in the statute, indicated that actual existing officers of the State were in the minds of the legislators when they passed the act, and judgment was arrested. See Com. *v.*Kinney, 3 Lehigh L. J. 178. The same principle applies here.

The demurrer is sustained and the indictment is set aside.

Demurrer sustained.

From George Ross Eshleman, Lancaster, Pa.
<Page>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-66374) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-56996,
333-96825 and 333-110905) of deCODE genetics, Inc. of our report dated
February 27, 2004, except for the fifth paragraph of the footnote titled
"Debt" for which the date is March 15, 2004, relating to the consolidated
financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We
also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Selected Financial
Data" in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2004
Docket Number FAA-2012-0642
### Snoden, Barbara (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject:
Hi Dan, Snoden, Barbara (OST) Friday, August 15, 2014 3:29 PM Dan Schroeder Gem Forecast Expenses < .. :-.

······· ,.,··.. We are reviewing your amended financial information and notice thatthe totals on your 8/3/201L(§prea;(fsheet are way off. It looks like only the last two columns are adding correctly in the "total" column. Therefore, your forecast first year operating expenses are off
...at least forthe on-demand operations. Also, can you please identify/specifythe indirect expenses (above total expenses line)on the commuter operations forecast spreadsheet. In addition, please formatyour consolidated expense sheet using the same expense lines as the othertwo reports. I will submit a copy ofthis email to Dockets. Thank you, Barbara Barbara A. Snoden Transportation Industry Analyst US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4834

1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                                  Subsidiaries



Name                                                 Jurisdiction of Formation
----                                                 -------------------------
NCO Financial Systems, Inc.                          Pennsylvania
NCO Funding, Inc.                                    Delaware
NCO Financial Services, Inc.                         Canada
FCA Funding, Inc.                                    Delaware
NCO Portfolio Management, Inc. *                     Delaware
Compass International Services Corporation           Delaware
NCO Financial Services (UK), Limited                 United Kingdom
NCO Financial Systems of Puerto Rico, Inc.           Puerto Rico
JDR Holdings, Inc.                                   Delaware
NCO Holdings, Inc.                                   Delaware
NCO Benefit Systems, Inc.                            Pennsylvania

* Owns 24 subsidiaries operating in the United States engaged in the ownership
  of delinquent receivables.

Note: This table does not include any subsidiary that is not required to be
      listed pursuant to Item 601 (b) (21) of Regulation S-K.
Exhibit
    10.11
  Base
    Contract for Sale and Purchase of Natural Gas
    Ultra Resources, Inc.

and

NICOR ENERCHANGE, LLC363 N. Sam Houston Pkwy, E., Suite 1200, Houston,
    TX 77060



3333 WARRENVILLE RD, SUITE 630, LISLE, IL 60532Duns Number:
    07-110-9974



Duns Number: 05-370-8124Contract
    Number: ­
    ­



Contract Number:
    ­
    ­U.S. Federal Tax ID Number:
    83-0320643



U.S. Federal Tax ID Number: 76-0481753Notices:363 N. Sam Houston Pkwy, E., Suite 1200, Houston,
    TX 77060



Nicor Enerchange, LLCAttn: Gas Marketing



Attn: Contract AdministrationPhone:
    281.876.0120          Fax:
    281.876.2831



Phone:
    630-245-7833          Fax: 630-245-7839Confirmations:Same as Above



Nicor Enerchange, LLCAttn ­
    ­



Attn: Accounting Dept.Phone
    ­
    ­          Fax: ­
    ­



Phone:
    630-245-7843          Fax:
    630-245-7839Invoices and Payments:Same as Above



Nicor Enerchange, LLCAttn: ­
    ­



Attn: Accounting Dept.3333 Warrenville Rd. Suite 630, Lisle, IL 60532Phone: ­
    ­          Fax: ­
    ­



Phone:
    630-245-7843          Fax:
    630-245-7839Wire Transfer or ACH Numbers (if applicable):BANK:
    ­
    ­



BANK:
    ­
    ­ABA:
    ­
    ­



ABA:
    ­
    ­ACCT:
    ­
    ­



ACCT:
    ­
    ­Other
    Details: ­
    ­



Other
    Details: ­
    ­   Select only one box from each section:
  Section 1.2

X

Oral (default)

Section 7.2

X

25thDay of Month followingTransaction

o

Written

Payment Date



Month of delivery (default)Procedure







o

Day of Month following Month of deliverySection 2.5

X

2 Business Days after receipt (default)

Section 7.2

X

Wire transfer (default)Confirm

o

Business Days after receipt

Method of

X

Automated Clearinghouse Credit (ACH)Deadline





Payment

o

CheckSection 2.6

o

Seller (default)

Section 7.7

X

Netting applies (default)Confirming

o

Buyer

Netting

o

Netting does not applyParty

X

Nicor EnerchangeSection 3.2

o

Cover Standard (default)

Section 10.3.1

X

Early Termination Damages Apply (default)Performance

X

Spot Price Standard

Early Termination

o

Early Termination Damages Do Not ApplyObligation





DamagesSection 10.3.2

X

Other Agreement Setoffs Apply (default)Note: The following Spot Price Publication applies to both
    of the immediately preceding.

Other Agreement Setoffs

o

Other Agreement Setoffs Do Not ApplySection 2.26

X

Gas Daily Midpoint (default)

Section 14.5Spot Price
    Publication

o



Choice Of Law



ILLINOISSection 6

X

Buyer Pays At and After Delivery

Section 14.10

X

Confidentiality applies (default)Taxes



Point (default)

Confidentiality

o

Confidentiality does not applyo

Seller Pays Before and At Delivery PointX Special Provisions Number of sheets attached: 3oAddendum(s): ­
    ­     ULTRA RESOURCES, INC

NICOR ENERCHANGE, LLCParty Name

Party Name   By -s- Stuart E. Nance

By -s- Steve CittadineName: Stuart E. Nance

Name: Steve CittadineTitle: Vice President

Title: President    Copyright
    ©

    2002 North American Energy Standards Board, Inc.
    NAESB Standard 6.3.1 All
    Rights Reserved
    April 19, 2002