alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.30

                                 SECOND ADDENDUM


         This Second Addendum amends that certain Employment Agreement dated
June 5, 1998 by and between JOSHUA GINDIN and NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., a
Pennsylvania corporation (the "Agreement"),as amended effective January 1, 1999
and this Addendum shall be effective as of July 1, 2003 (the "Effective Date").

         For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.       "The Term of the Agreement shall be extended for a period of three (3)
         years, terminating on June 30, 2006, subject to any early termination
         provisions set forth in the Agreement."

2.       Paragraph B of Exhibit "A" of the Agreement is amended by deleting the
         text of such paragraph in its entirety and replacing it with the
         following:

         Annual Bonus: In addition to the Base Salary, so long as Employee
         satisfies the duties and obligations of his employment, including
         meeting individual annual goals and objectives and Company's overall
         performance, Employee shall be entitled to receive an Annual Bonus
         determined in a fair and equitable method consistent among similarly
         situated executive officers of the Company. Employee's Annual Bonus
         shall be in an amount up to seventy five percent (75%) of the Base
         Salary. The bonus shall be paid out of a bonus pool of funds
         established by the Company's compensation committee based on the
         Company's economic performance and other extenuating circumstances, if
         any, together with input from the Chief Executive Officer of the
         Company. The bonus pool shall be calculated as follows:


          Results/Plan               Incentive as a Percent of Target
          ------------               --------------------------------
                                                     0
          Less than 90%
          90%                                       20%
          91% to 100%                   +8% for each point above 90
          100%                                     100%
          100% to 120%              +5% for each point from 100 to 120
          120% and above                           200%


<PAGE>


3.       In the event any term or condition of this Addendum is inconsistent
         with any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms of this Addendum
         will control. Except as stated above, all the terms and conditions of
         the Agreement, including all restrictions and covenants, shall remain
         in full force and effect and are incorporated herein by reference as
         though set forth at length.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum to become
effective on the Effective Date.

NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.


By:____________________________               ______________________________
                                              Joshua Gindin
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: ARMANDO MADRID,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-16-00292-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Martin Muncy, Judge of the 109th District Court of Andrews County, 

Texas, and concludes that Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We 

therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES OF ULTRA PETROLEUM CORP.



|                               |  |                              |  |          | 
|------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------- |  | -------- | 
|Entity                         |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|UP Energy Corporation          |  |                              |  | Delaware | 
|Ultra Resources, Inc.          |  |                              |  | Delaware | 
|Ultra Wyoming, LLC             |  |                              |  | Delaware | 
|UPL Pinedale, LLC              |  |                              |  | Delaware | 
|UPL Three Rivers Holdings, LLC |  |                              |  | Delaware | 
|Ultra Wyoming LGS, LLC         |  |                              |  | Delaware |
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Northeast   Mortgage
Corporation  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Sean Rogerson,  Vice-President  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Sean Rogerson
Sean Rogerson
Vice-President
(Principal Financial Officer)


September 18, 2003


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>



                                                                Exhibit No. 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-60793 of The Judge Group, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report, dated February
22, 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Judge Group, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                                   McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Blue Bell, Pennsylvania
March 23, 2002





                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-60793 of The Judge Group, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report, dated February
25, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Judge Group, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                                     Rudolph, Palitz, LLC

Blue Bell, Pennsylvania
March 23, 2002
APRIL CROP PRODUCTION

Executive Summary

April 10, 2012 8:30 AM

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service
USDA-NASS 

4-10-12
April 2012 Crop Production

Crop Unit

April 

2012

% Change 

from 

Previous 

Forecast

% Change 

from 

Previous 

Season

Oranges Mil Tons 8.91 - 1.1 - < 0.1

Grapefruit Mil Tons 1.15 + 1.9 - 9.3

Lemons Thou Tons 812 + 0.5 - 11.7

Tangerines

 and Mandarins

Thou Tons 604 - 3.2 - 4.0

Tangelos Thou Tons 52.0 NC NC

USDA-NASS

4-10-12
Crop Unit

April 

2012

% Change

from 

Previous 

Forecast

% Change

from 

Previous 

Season

 Potatoes:

 Spring Mil Cwt 27.2 --- + 6.4

USDA-NASS 

4-10-12 

April 2012 Crop Production
Upcoming Reports 

April 20 Cattle on Feed

April 30 Agricultural Prices

May 10 Crop Production

Cotton Ginnings (Annual)

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

USDA-NASS 

4-10-12
# Air National Guard Maintainers Innovate C-17 Platform

/ Published Dec. 28, 2022

NEWBURGH, N.Y. – The thundering of hammers and wrenches echoed throughout an ordinarily calm aircraft hangar Dec. 21 as a $1.5 million National Guard Bureau investment was pieced together at Stewart Air National Guard Base, home of the 105th Airlift Wing and its nine C-17 Globemaster III transport aircraft.

The New York Air National Guard now stewards a state-of-the-art C-17 maintenance platform manufactured by Cv International (CVI), designed with assistance from eight senior Air National Guard maintenance personnel from around the nation.

“Initially, we went down to Martinsburg, Virginia, and we did a design phase where we came up with ideas ... from our past experience, “said Senior Master Sgt. John E. Tobin III, an inspection section supervisor at the 105th Maintenance Squadron. “From that point, CVI went back to the drawing board. Then we went back to Martinsburg for the first article test. There were a few modifications that had to be made at that point, which are implemented in the stands that we received.”

The groundbreaking stand promises to increase the airworthiness and safety of C-17 aircraft in Stewart’s hangar while saving time and resources. It features an ergonomically designed layout that allows for a quick turnaround for minor repairs and inspections. According to CVI, the platform reduces maintenance time by over 40% and technician fatigue by 97%.

“We were using those little blue Genie lifts, and for each person on a Genie lift, you need a spotter,” Tobin explained. “One person was standing on the ground and watching them drive around, looking at one small area of the aircraft at a time. Now the ground spotters would be able to work ... instead of just standing on the ground watching.”

The platform’s cutting-edge technology – including LED lighting and anti-slip surfaces – makes it safer for technicians. It is also adjustable, allowing mechanics more access to the aircraft’s under-structure.

“The guys from each base were very engaged,” said Sam Zumbrunnen, president of CVI. “John Tobin was extremely helpful and provided a lot of input into the design, being the voice of the end-user to make sure that we capture the nuances for the maintainers ... to make sure that all their needs could be met.”

The maintenance stand is the latest example of how the Air National Guard strives for innovation and excellence.

“This section has a strong and long history of continuous process improvement, and this is another aspect of that CPI initiative,” said Lt. Col. Eric L. Durkins II, commander, 105th Maintenance Squadron.

“I know all the guys are pretty happy to have them and the jet shop guys are thrilled from what I’ve seen so far because the access that they have now is so much better,” said Tobin.

“We might actually be spending a little bit more time in the fix phase ... because what the guys find during the inspections could potentially keep us on the ground a little longer – but we’ll have a safer aircraft for it.”
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

C2G Ltd. Company ) 

) 

Under Contract No. HTC711-12-C-R001 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60397 

Katherine S. Nucci, Esq. 

Thompson Coburn LLP 

Washington, DC 

Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. 

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Phillip E. Reiman, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 6 December 2016 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60397, Appeal of C2G Ltd. 

Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hankersen International Corp.
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

August 21, 2006


By: /S/ PENGCHENG CHEN
   -------------------------
      Pengcheng Chen, CEO
Estimating States States Removed From Program

California Florida

Maryland Illinois

Oklahoma

Pennsylvania

Tennessee

Texas

States included in the estimating program for mushrooms.

Mushroom Program 

April 2024

Every 5 years NASS conducts a program review following the completion of the Census of Agriculture. The primary purpose is to ensure that the NASS 

annual estimating program targets commodities and states most relevant based on the latest available information. Last fall we announced the 

program review and requested stakeholder input.

The primary source of information for the program review is the Census of Agriculture, since it is the most comprehensive source of data; however we 

also take into consideration estimates from the current annual estimating program and administrative data.

The program changes balance resources across all of the programs included in the annual estimating program, which represents over 400 individual 

reports.

Total mushroom sales from the 2022 Census of Agriculture were arrayed from largest to smallest. States that account for the largest proportion of 

the total were identified for inclusion in the annual estimating program. This allows us to provide the most useful data to the agricultural sector in 

the most efficient means possible given the limited available resources.

Annual Mushroom Program
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 
 THIS ASSIGNMENT
OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT dated April 25, 2013, is made by and between Wheeler Interests, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, (“Assignor”), and WHLR-Forrest Gallery, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“Assignee”). 
 Background: 
 A. Wheeler Interests, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company and Forrest Gallery, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company previously entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 23,
2013 (the “Agreement”), with respect to the purchase of a shopping center located at Tullahoma, Tennessee and commonly referred to as Forrest Gallery Shopping Center; 

B. Assignor desires to assign the Agreement to Assignee. 
 Agreement: 
 For and in consideration of the mutual promises herein,
Assignor herby assigns all of its rights and delegates all of its obligations under the Agreement to Assignee, including all rights to any earnest money deposit or other payment, and Assignee hereby accepts the assignment of the rights of Assignor
under the Agreement and assumes all of the obligations and liabilities of Assignor under the Agreement. 
 (Signature Page
Follows) 







 In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the
25th day of April 2013. 

 

					
	ASSIGNOR:
	
	 WHEELER INTERESTS, LLC,
 a Virginia limited liability company

		
		 	 /s/ Jon S. Wheeler

		 	By	 	Jon S. Wheeler, its Managing Member
	
	ASSIGNEE:
	
	 WHLR-FORREST GALLERY, LLC,
 a Delaware limited liability company

		
		 	 /s/ Jon S. Wheeler

		 	By	 	Jon S. Wheeler, its Manager
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





C.W.
Gilluly, Chief Financial Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the “Company”) certifies
in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007 and that
to the best of his or her knowledge:





1.
            the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.




October 8,
      2008
            /s/ C.W. Gilluly,
      Ed.D.C.W. Gilluly,
      Ed.D.Principal Finance
      Officer(Chief Financial
      Officer)
#### Digory W. Baker et al. v. National Biscuit Co.

1. *Injunctions—Pending Suits Involving Property*Rights.—An injunction restraining a tenant from removing certain trade fixtures from the demised premises pending a suit involving the right of such removal was properly granted in this case.

Interlocutory Order, granting an injunction. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Area N. Waterman, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1901.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 23, 1901.

Edward W. Cullen, attorney for appellants.

Peck, Miller & Starr and Green, Honors & Peters, attorneys for appellee.

Mr. Justice Freeman

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order granting an injunction.

Appellee was a tenant of appellants, and the former’s assignor had erected upon the leased premises certain ovens, a boiler, and other fixtures used in appellee’s business, which the latter was about to remove before the expiration of the lease. This, however, it was prevented from doing by an injunction obtained by appellants restraining such removal, upon a bill of complaint in which appellants set up a claim to said fixtures as part of the freehold and not removable by the tenant. Upon the final hearing that injunction was dissolved, but pending appeal from such final order, appellants obtained in the Appellate Court an order continuing-said injunction in force, and thereupon appellee filed the present bill. Its object was to prevent appellants from taking possession of, leasing or otherwise interfering with the fixtures in controversy pending the appeal which said, appellants had taken from the order dissolving, the injunction so obtained by them. Having obtained an order in effect continuing in force the injunction restraining appellee from removing said fixtures pending such appeal, appel*229lants had effectually tied the hands of appellee, and according to the bill of complaint now under consideration were intending themselves to appropriate the property in dispute pending the determination of the appeal in this court involving their right so to do. In order, therefore, to preserve the *status quo*until the question of ownership of the fixtures should be decided, this bill was filed and injunction granted.

The order of the Circuit Court dissolving the injunction obtained by appellants which restrained appellee from removing the fixtures in dispute having now been affirmed (Baker v. McClurg) at the present term, the decision in that case is conclusive in this. It having been determined that appellee is entitled to remove the property in question as trade fixtures, and it having been prevented from so doing by the wrongful action of appellants, we regard the interlocutory injunction herein complained of as properly granted under all the circumstances.

The order of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed.

Mr. Justice Waterman, having presided at the hearing of this case in the court below, took no part in the determination of the matter in this court.
Exhibit 10.22








SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




WHEREAS, Robert L. Kayl (“Executive”) and Tesco Corporation entered into the Employment Agreement dated August 18, 2008 and as amended on March 15, 2009 (the “Agreement”); and




WHEREAS, Section 7(i)(v) of the Agreement has an error with respect to the timing of payment and no amount is vested thereunder and the parties desire to amend Section 7(f) of the Agreement to add requirements under new guidance from the Internal Revenue Service;




NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:




1.
Section 7(f) shall be amended to add the following at the end thereof:




“Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, to the extent any amounts payable under Sections 7(c), (d) or (e) are deferred compensation and not otherwise exempt from the requirements of Code Section 409A, no payment will be paid or commence to be paid hereunder until the date which is the 60th day after the Date of Termination.”




2.
Section 7(i)(v) shall be amended so that the word “second” shall be replaced with the word “first” in each place in which it occurs.




This Second Amendment may be executed by portable document format (pdf) or facsimile signature which signature shall be binding on the parties hereto.




WHEREAS, the parties have executed this Second Amendment effective as of December 31, 2010.




EXECUTIVE                                                                                     TESCO CORPORATION





ROBERT L. KAYL








/s/ Robert L. Kayl                                                      By: /s/ Julio M. Quintana


Robert L. Kayl                                                                                     Julio M. Quintana


President and CEO


1