alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Slocum v. Carlton et al.

1. Feivolous appeal — practice.—Where the defendant in a foreclosure case, interposed a frivolous demurrer, and upon the overruling of which and the rendition of a decree against him, appealed to the supreme court, obviously without merits, and for the purpose of vexing and delaying the complainant; upon affirmance of the decree the court will decree not only all costs against him, but the statute penalty of the payment of twenty-five per cent, interest on the sum decreed until paid.

(1 *Ghand.*165.)

APPEAL from the late District Court for *Racine*County.

The bill was filed for the foreclosure of a mortgage, to which the defendant (the appellant here) interposed a demurrer which was adjudged frivolous, ana upon that brought his appeal to this court. This court regarding the procedure of the appellant as vexatious and for delay, and without any special equity affirmed the decree made by the court below, and awarded damages.

*204
      *E. W.*Evans, for appellant.

*A. G. Ghatfield,*for appellees.

Stow, C. J.

Tbe bill in this case was for tbe foreclosure of a mortgage ; tbe defendant interposed a frivolous demurrer, which having been overruled, and be neglecting to answer, a decree *jyro confesso*was taken. From this decree tbe defendant has appealed to this court.

I do not understand that it is pretended that tbe decree ought to be reversed, and tbe only question with us is, with what penalty it shall be affirmed. Tbe appeal has evidently been brought, either for tbe purpose of annoying tbe complainant, or for delay, and in either case tbe defendant should be subjected to tbe highest penalty which we are authorized to impose. It may be,a public benefit for parties to understand, that if they will harass their opponents with vexatious litigation, or if, on speculation, they think it an object to avail themselves of what is called the law’s delay, they must do so at their peril and expect no lenity from this court. In this case the statute authorizes us to award twenty-five per cent, damages and costs, and with which the decree is to be affirmed.

Decree affirmed, with twenty-five per cent, damages and costs.
Part 1, Section B, Item 2(c) – ID Method
#### Bronson et al. *vs.*Burnett et al.

A writ of error, instead of an appeal, is the proper course for bringing before the Supreme Court the proceedings had before a Judge of Probate, when an appeal had been taken to the District Court, and the Judge of Probate’s decision affirmed.

The proceedings in this case were originally commenced before the Judge of Probate of Grant County, the matter in controversy being the estate, and an alleged nun-cupative will, of the late Thomas P. Burnett. From the decision of the Probate Judge, an appeal was taken to the Grant District Court; the Judge of which Court (the late Territorial Chief Justice Dunn,) sustained the decision of the Probate Judge; and on this judgment, or decree, a writ of error was brought to this Court.

*Lakin*& *Mills,*for the defendants in error,

moved to *10dismiss, on the ground that a writ of error did not lie on a proceeding of this character, the proper process of a review’ being an appeal.

*S. Crawford,*for the plaintiffs in error.

*The Court,*

(the Chief Justice giving the opinion, which was verbal) denied the motion: remarking that it was of no moment which proceeding, a writ of error, or an appeal, was pursued-. That it was one of those oases where it,was of more importance that the rule should be settled, than what that rule was; and that, in the absence of authority, or precedent, the Court felt at liberty to adopt such a course as was deemed most expedient; and that, on the whole, a writ of error was preferable to an appeal.

Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,497
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  78,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               80,046
<PP&E>                                         3,897,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,803,131)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,173,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,076
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     981,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,173,967
<SALES>                                        196,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,125
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  372,712<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (223,989)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (223,989)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (223,989)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1414 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-227-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

ASL560XL-53-08 4.8 $ 408.00 $255 $ 663.00 475 $314,925.00

SB560XL-53-16 9.6 $ 816.00 $489 $1.305.00 475 $619,875.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $934,800

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs: 

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 BASE SALARIES OF, AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS WITH, 
 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 

On April 29, 2013, the Compensation & Organization Committee of the Board of Directors approved the annual base
salaries for executive management effective May 1, 2013. There was no increase in the base salary for Mr. Surma, the Chief Executive Officer, or any other named executive officer except for Mr. Garraux. Effective May 1, 2013, the base salaries
for the named executive officers are as follows: 
  

					
	J. P. Surma	 	$	1,260,000	  
	M. Longhi	 	$	820,000	  
	G. R. Haggerty	 	$	621,180	  
	J. D. Garraux	 	$	599,872	  
	D. H. Lohr	 	$	550,800	  

 The named executive officers listed above are also provided the following perquisites: limited
personal use of corporate aircraft and automobiles; dining privileges; club memberships; financial planning and tax preparation services; parking expenses; company-paid physicals; limited personal use of corporate properties; use of sports and
entertainment tickets; matching contributions to charities; relocation expenses; and, in the case of executives on foreign assignment, foreign service premiums, the services of a driver, security, housing and utility benefits, foreign service cost
of living adjustment and allowances for communications and home leave. Additionally, there are tax gross ups and reimbursements associated with foreign service.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-87645 and 333-39219) of Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc., of
our report dated February 5, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Chicago, Illinois
March 24, 2000
Exhibit 32



Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form
10-Q of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mitchell Steinhause as Principal Executive Officer of
the Company, and Lewis A. Raibley, III, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |        |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: December 28, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Mitchell Steinhause      
|                         |  | Name:  |  | Mitchell Steinhause          
|                         |  | Title: |  | Chairman                     
|                         |  |        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)



|                         |  |        |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: December 28, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Lewis A. Raibley, III    
|                         |  | Name:  |  | Lewis A. Raibley, III        
|                         |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                         |  |        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19089-19090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Loan Repayment 2015.
    Date: May 4, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 2C212, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Bita Nakhai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, 
National Institute on Aging, Gateway Bldg., 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, Md 20814, 301-402-7701, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91fff0faf9f0f8f3d1fff8f0bffff8f9bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="335d52585b525a51735d5a521d5d5a5b1d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; UNITING THE PHYSIOLOGY OF AGING BY MEANS OF INNOVATIVE TOOLS.
    Date: May 13, 2015.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 2C212, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Bita Nakhai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, 
National Institute on Aging, Gateway Bldg., 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, Md 20814, 301-402-7701, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84eae5efece5ede6c4eaede5aaeaedecaae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e18f808a89808883a18f8880cf8f8889cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 19090]]


    Dated: April 3, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-08132 Filed 4-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Service becomes a family affair for these Ohio Air Guard members

/ Published Dec. 15, 2016

MANSFIELD, Ohio - Many people in the Air National Guard refer to their coworkers as their 'Guard family.' In some cases, like the Burtons, they really are family. 

Cooper Burton stood next to his father as they both raised their right hands and recited the oath of enlistment Dec. 2 at the 179th Airlift Wing, Mansfield, Ohio. Cooper enlisted into the Ohio Air National Guard and he is starting his career as a crew chief at the 179th AW. His father, Senior Master Sgt. Roger Burton, the fire chief at the 179th AW, reenlisted for the final term of his career. 

'It's exciting to see your kids follow in your footsteps,' Chief Burton said 'It's definitely kind of emotional because he's going on his first enlistment and I'm going on my last.'

Chief Burton first joined the military in 1988 as active-duty Air Force.

Ironically, Chief Burton originally enlisted at the 179th AW on Cooper's sixth birthday. 

Chief Burton said Cooper started to show more interest in the Guard when he attended his older brother Zachary's graduation from Basic Military Training in the summer of 2014. 

He said he saw his son, Zach, grow so much once he joined the Air National Guard and is excited to see that for Cooper.

'Even if he doesn't stay and make a career out of it like I did, I think it's a good experience for him to learn the discipline, to be a part of the 'Guard family',' said Chief Burton.

Although Chief Burton's career may be coming to an end soon, he is leaving quite a legacy. 

'It's pretty cool that both of my boys are taking the same path,' said Chief Burton.

Cooper said he is just a little nervous for Basic Military Training, but he is very excited to start this journey.

'I always thought about joining, because my father has always been in,' said Cooper. 'Growing up I wanted to be like him. Then, my older brother joined and that was just another thing that motivated me to join.'

In the Air National Guard, airmen should always be training their replacements. As each incoming recruit raises their right hand, they are nudging another veteran out at the top. For every senior enlisted member who retires, there is a new generation of Airmen ready to serve and carry on their legacy. 

In this case, there is no difference between their family and their 'Guard family.'
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: March 29, 2006                          By: /s/ Charles T. Jensen
      -----------------                       Name: Charles T. Jensen
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia  Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                     32.1-1
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3069 

To reauthorize the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2021 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. PORTMAN, Ms. STABENOW, and Mr. 

YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife 

Restoration Act of 1990, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Great Lakes Fish and 

5 Wildlife Restoration Reauthorization Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE GREAT LAKES FISH 

7 AND WILDLIFE RESTORATION ACT OF 1990. 

8 (a) REPORTS.—Section 1008 of the Great Lakes 

9 Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 

10 941f) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3069 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding 

2 paragraph (1)— 

3 (A) by inserting ‘‘and not later than De4 cember 31, 2027,’’ after ‘‘2021,’’; 

5 (B) by striking ‘‘Committee on Resources’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘Committee on Natural Re7 sources’’; and 

8 (C) by inserting ‘‘, with respect to the pe9 riod covered by the report’’ after ‘‘describes’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding 

12 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘2016 through 2020’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘2022 through 2027’’. 

14 (b) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 1009(a) of the 

15 Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990 

16 (16 U.S.C. 941g(a)) is amended, in the matter preceding 

17 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘2016 through 2021’’ and in18 serting ‘‘2022 through 2027’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# 28th ECAB digging in for Mideast mission

/ Published Sept. 30, 2020

KUWAIT – Soldiers with the 28th Expeditionary Combat Aviation Brigade have arrived in the U.S. Central Command region and are settling into their respective roles.

They are in the Middle East, within CENTCOM’s area of responsibility, to provide aviation assets and capabilities to increase regional security and peace in the region while serving U.S. interests.

The 28th ECAB is taking that aviation mission over from the 34th ECAB, which has served in the Middle East since late 2019. Since arriving, 28th ECAB Soldiers are working with their counterparts in the 34th ECAB.

“The 34th is setting us up for success by ensuring that we know how all the systems and processes work here. They are going over a lot of the best practices they came up with and a lot of the lessons learned,” said Capt. Michael Palermo, the brigade’s assistant intelligence officer. “It’s starting us off ahead of the curve.”

The process, called relief-in-place or RIP, features 34th ECAB Soldiers working with 28th ECAB Soldiers, teaching them the particulars of the job they will take over. It also allows the 28th to absorb knowledge and experiences from their predecessors.

“During our pre-mobilization preparation and training, the 28th ECAB got to know the 34th ECAB very well,” said Col. Howard Lloyd, commander of the 28th ECAB. “We found out that they have a great command team and are surrounded by a very professional and efficient staff.”

The 34th ECAB dealt with many hardships over their deployment, including missile attacks from Iran, rocket attacks from outlaw groups and COVID-19. They also suffered the loss of one of their own, Spc. Juan Mendez Covarrubias, a signal support systems specialist with 1st Battalion, 227th Aviation Regiment, who was killed in a rocket attack in March.

Through those hard times, the resilience and resolve of 34th ECAB Soldiers helped them complete their deployment. Passing the lessons learned from those experiences is helping the 28th ECAB get ready for the mission.

“34th ECAB Soldiers are resilient and specialists in their field,” said Lloyd. “It is an honor to follow in their footsteps and take the controls for supporting Operation Spartan Shield and Operation Inherent Resolve.”