alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Clearfield Hospital v. Lininger

*Nevling, Davis, Kriner &■ Yeager,*for plaintiff.

*David*E. *Blakley,*for defendants.

May 26, 1977

REILLY, *P.J.,*

On February 17, 1974, Daniel D. Warrick was admitted to the Clearfield Hospital as a patient and on March 5th of that year, the hospital determined that his condition was such that he should no longer be considered as a hospital patient but considered as “custodial care.” During his custodial status, the hospital attempted to have his relatives or other interested persons accept financial responsibility for his care and custody with no success. On June 21, 1974, he was transferred to the Clear Haven Nursing Home, and the hospital now seeks through this law suit to require Clearfield County to pay for the periods of custodial care provided by the hospital under the act of legislature placing the duty to care for any indigent upon the county: Act of June 24, 1937, P.L. 2017, 62 P.S. §2201 et seq.

Defendant county commissioners acknowledge the obligation of the county in this area, but defend on the grounds that they were never notified of Mr. Warrick’s indigency or of his status as a custodial *502patient in the Clearfield Hospital. This court is of the opinion that, before the county can be required to assume the financial obligation of the indigent party under custodial care in the Clearfield Hospital or any other location, written notice must be given to the county commissioners, naming the individual, declaring his indigency, and advising said commissioners that from and after a certain date they will be held financially responsible for his care. To hold otherwise would impose a burden on the county that it should not have to assume. The notice required would be extremely simple to provide and in so providing would give the county the opportunity to make other arrangements for the proper care of the patient, which would result in a great savings financially to the county. Since such notice, set forth above, was not provided in this case, the court enters the following

ORDER

Now, May 26, 1977, following trial without jury in the above-captioned matter, it is the order of this court that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of the defendant and the complaint of plaintiff dismissed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1758. COREY D. RICHARDSON v. THE STATE.

In 2008, a jury found Corey Richardson guilty of aggravated child molestation,

and the trial court imposed a life sentence, with the first 25 years to be served in prison

and the remainder to be served on probation. In an unpublished opinion on direct

appeal, we affirmed Richardson’s conviction but remanded to the trial court to correct

a sentencing error. Richardson v. State, 325 Ga. App XXVI (Feb. 18, 2014). On

remand, the trial court imposed a 20-year prison sentence, after whichRichardson filed

a motion to correct an illegal and/or void sentence. The trial court denied Richardson’s

motion, and we affirmed on direct appeal. Richardson v. State, 334 Ga. App. 344 (779

SE2d 406) (2015).

In February 2016, Richardson filed a “Motion to Challenge Conviction,” in

which he argued that his indictment was deficient and that the State failed to establish

venue at his trial. The trial court denied Richardson’s motion in an order entered on

February 12, 2016. On March 28, 2016, Richardson moved for leave to file an out-oftime appeal to challenge the denial of his “Motion to Challenge Conviction,” which the

trial court also denied. Richardson then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

An out-of-time appeal is appropriate only when a defendant has a right to a direct

appeal. Grantham v. State, 267 Ga. 635, 635 (481 SE2d 219) (1997). “[A] petition

to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal

case,” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009), and any appeal

from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed, see id. at 218

(2); see also Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Because

December 06, 2016
Richardson has no right to a direct appeal in this case, he is not entitled to an out-oftime appeal. See Grantham, 267 Ga. at 635.

Richardson also has no right to an out-of-time appeal for the additional reason

that, as discussed above, he already has obtained review of his judgment of conviction

by way of a direct appeal. See Milliken v. State, 259 Ga. App. 144, 145 (575 SE2d

910) (2003) (an out-of-time appeal “is not a remedy available to a criminal defendant

whose conviction has been reviewed by an appellate court on direct appeal since that

defendant is not entitled to a second direct appeal from his judgment of conviction”);

see also Lewis v. State, 300 Ga. App. 586, 587 (685 SE2d 485) (2009).

For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

The State’s motion to dismissthis appeal on the ground that Richardson has abandoned

all of his claims on appeal is DENIED as MOOT.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/06/2016
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of Montana Mining Corp. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ruairidh Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)     This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small

| | business issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

May 11, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# C_2016167EN.01000102.xml

| 11.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7998 — Pacific Mezz/Oaktree/Railpool)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 167/02)

On 28 April 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7998. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7998. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 12, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133849 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, MICHAEL RUSSELL and CHRISTINA Justices 

RUSSELL, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 133849 

 COA: 273144 

Jackson CC: 05-005634-NO 

RAMSEY HOLDING, LLC, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0905 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 12, 2007 

 Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 140 (Monday, July 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 43963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17563]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twenty-Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
twenty-third meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held on June 20, 2013 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will 
include the following:

August 8, 2013

 Welcome, Introductions & Administrative Remarks
 Review and Approve Summary of the Twenty-second Meeting
 Updates from TSA (as required)
 Document Detailed Review
 Document Finalization Process
 Time and Place of Next Meeting
 Any Other Business
 Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 12, 2013.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-17563 Filed 7-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barry D. Elkins, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of Direct General Corporation on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Direct General Corporation.

        March 5, 2004                  By: /s/ Barry D. Elkins
            Date                           -------------------------------------
                                                             (Signature)
                                       Name:  Barry D. Elkins
                                              ----------------------------------
                                       Title: Senior Vice President and
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              ----------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                       797
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,393
<PP&E>                                          14,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,853
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,806
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,273)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,292
<SALES>                                          2,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,663
<CGS>                                            1,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (35)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,606)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,606)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)


</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT
32.2(a)


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





(ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Holli C. Nichols,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





Date:
      November 5, 2009
            By:
            /s/    HOLLIC.NICHOLSHolli
      C. Nichols
              Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB/A for the quarter ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Sandro
      Natale, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
                December 20, 2007
            
            /s/ Sandro
              NataleName:
                Sandro NataleTitle:
                President & Chief Executive
                Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James E. Newsome as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Kenneth D. Shifrin, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ James E. NewsomeName:

James E. NewsomeTitle:

President & CEO (Principal Executive Officer)Date: November 9, 2006By:

/s/ Kenneth D. ShifrinName:

Kenneth D. ShifrinTitle:

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)Date: November 9, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2846 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2846

   To require Federal agencies to acknowledge, accept, and agree to 
truthfully present, natural immunity pertaining to COVID-19 pursuant to 
                   promulgating certain regulations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2021

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require Federal agencies to acknowledge, accept, and agree to 
truthfully present, natural immunity pertaining to COVID-19 pursuant to 
                   promulgating certain regulations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Natural Immunity Is Real Act''.

SEC. 2. NATURAL IMMUNITY TO COVID-19.

    (a) In General.--Pursuant to any regulation promulgated by a 
Federal agency and related to the public health emergency declared by 
the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 319 of the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d) with respect to COVID-19, 
the applicable agency shall acknowledge, accept, agree to truthfully 
present, and incorporate, the consideration of natural immunity as it 
pertains to COVID-19 with respect to the individuals subject to the 
applicable regulations.
    (b) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``natural 
immunity'' means immunity that is naturally existing.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to allow for, or authorize, a Federal vaccination mandate.
                                 <all>
```
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

38 39 40


### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL