alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3115 

AN ACT 

To remove the 4-year sunset from the Pro bono Work to 

Empower and Represent Act of 2018. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3115 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pro bono Work to Em3 power and Represent Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘POWER 2.0 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF SUNSET. 

6 Section 3(a) of the Pro bono Work to Empower and 

7 Represent Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–237; 132 Stat. 

8 2448) is amended by striking ‘‘for a period of 4 years’’. 

Passed the Senate August 6, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3115 

AN ACT 

Work to Empower and Represent Act of 2018. 

To remove the 4-year sunset from the Pro bono
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Acrongenomics Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Ron Lizée, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

May 20, 2008

| | /s/ Ron Lizée                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------
| | Ron Lizée                                             
| | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and
      Director
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal            
| | Accounting Officer)                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Acrongenomics Inc. and will be retained by
Acrongenomics Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001022644
<NAME> ELDORADO RESORTS LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,496
<INVENTORY>                                      2,882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,604
<PP&E>                                         236,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 238,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,158
<BONDS>                                        126,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   238,627
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,281
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,078
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,238
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,238
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,238
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
INTC ex10.1 10Q 3.31.2013






Exhibit 10.1
Amendment to Vesting Schedule to 
2012 Grants of Special Retention Restricted Stock Units


Effective January 21, 2013, Section 2 of the Forms of Agreement of Special Retention Restricted Stock Units granted to Messrs. Perlmutter, Holt, Kilroy, Krzanich, Smith and James on January 24, 2012 are amended to read as follows:


		
	“2.
	VESTING OF RSUs


As specified in the Notice of Grant, RSUs will vest in annual tranches beginning on the second anniversary of the Grant Date: 10% on second anniversary of the Grant Date, 20% on the third anniversary of the Grant Date, 30% on the fourth anniversary of the Grant Date and 40% on the fifth anniversary of the Grant Date.  As specified in the Notice of Grant, this grant of RSUs will vest in the following annual tranches and dates, starting on January 24, 2014: 20% on January 24, 2014, 40% on January 24, 2015, and 40% on January 24, 2016.  Provided that you remain continuously employed by the Corporation or a Subsidiary on a full time basis from the Grant Date specified in the Notice of Grant through each vesting date specified in the Notice of Grant, the RSUs shall vest and be converted into the right to receive the number of shares of the Corporation's Common Stock, $.001 par value (the “Common Stock”), specified on the Notice of Grant with respect to such vesting date, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement.  If a vesting date falls on a weekend or any other day on which the Nasdaq Stock Market ("NASDAQ") is not open, affected RSUs shall vest on the next following NASDAQ business day.  The number of shares of Common Stock into which RSUs convert as specified in the Notice of Grant shall be adjusted for stock splits and similar matters as specified in and pursuant to the 2006 Plan.  RSUs will vest to the extent provided in and in accordance with the terms of the Notice of Grant and this Agreement.  If your status as an Employee terminates for any reason except death, or Disablement (defined below), prior to the vesting dates set forth in your Notice of Grant, your unvested RSUs will be cancelled.”
Order entered February 22 , 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00714

- CV

ROBERT L. WILSON, Appellant

V.

J. RANDLE HENDERSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 16

- 15162



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 20, 2019 motion for leave to file an amended

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant to file separately the amended bri ef

attached to his motion within ten days of the date of this order.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
[FORM]
LIZ CLAIBORNE, INC.
2010 PROFITABILITY INCENTIVE AWARD
NOTICE OF AWARD TO:
 PARTICIPANT NAME:PARTICIPANT ID:GRANT DATE:
 [75% of Total Value]
    
    $[25%]NUMBER OF SHARES
    
    CASH BONUS(LONG-TERM COMPONENT)
    
    (INTERMEDIATE COMPONENT)




---



##### 



2010 Profitability Incentive Award Agreement
 Award Agreement Grant Date Company Participant
 Committee Board Award 162(m) Plan Equity Plan
 2010 Profitability Incentive Award Long-Term Component Intermediate Component
 Threshold Section 162(m) Goal
 162(m) Goal
  Vesting
  Performance Period
 Performance Metrics
 Long-Term Component




---



##### 



Adjusted EPS Goal EBITDA Margin
Goal
 Intermediate Component Positive EPS Goal
 Change in Control Shares 1
 Adjustments
   Payment of Awards
 Long-Term Component
 
 1
    
    Change in Control definition as drafted for
the proposed 2010 SIP.




---



##### 



Long-Term
Component Payment Date
  Intermediate Component
  Intermediate Component Payment Date Payment Date
 Termination of Employment
  2
 
 2
    
    Cause as defined in the 2011 Executive
Severance Agreement.




---



##### 



Rights as a Stockholder
 Plan Provisions to Prevail provided however
 Withholding Taxes
 Nature of Payments
 Administration




---



##### 



Notices
 Right of Discharge Preserved
 Successors and Assigns
 No Right to Future Awards
 Governing Law
 Entire Agreement
 Amendments




---



##### 



Section 409A Code
   LIZ CLAIBORNEBy the Committee ofthe Board of Directors:[Members]By:




---



##### 



Authorized SignatureName:Consented and Agreed to:[Executive Name]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements as of July 31, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such consolidated
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                         AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                                    $323,000
<SECURITIES>                                                    $0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           $3,280,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                              $456,000
<INVENTORY>                                             $4,935,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        $9,023,000
<PP&E>                                                    $256,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  $0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         $15,769,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   $2,470,000
<BONDS>                                                         $0
<COMMON>                                               $17,591,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           $0
<PREFERRED>                                                     $0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      $0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           $15,769,000
<SALES>                                                $12,753,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       $12,753,000
<CGS>                                                   $6,738,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           $6,738,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        $6,496,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        $197,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        ($1,142,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    $0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    ($1,142,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 $0
<CHANGES>                                                       $0
<NET-INCOME>                                           ($1,142,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.46)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 65 (Monday, April 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07726]



[[Page 18443]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for International and Integrative Activities; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:
    Name: Committee of Visitors for the Experimental Program to 
Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR), #1373.
    Dates/Time: June 9-10, 2015; 8 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230, Stafford I Room 920.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Persons: Denise Barnes, Section Head, Uma Venkateswaran, 
Program Director, Beth Strausser, Associate Program Manager (Detail), 
and Elizabeth Lawrence, Program Analyst. Experimental Program to 
Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR); Office of Integrative 
Activities, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone: (703) 292-8683.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out Committee of Visitors (COV) 
review, including examination of decisions on proposals, reviewer 
comments, and other privileged materials.
    Agenda: To provide a balanced assessment of NSF EPSCoR's 
performance in the integrity and efficiency of processes related to 
proposal review.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; and information on personnel. These matters are 
exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 31, 2015.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting, Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-07726 Filed 4-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Mr. Eric Fygi 

Deputy General Counsel 

Department of Energy 

Washington, DC 20585 

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitnlst Division 

Sharis A. Pozen 

Acting Assistant Attorney General 

RFK Main Justice Buildmg 

950 Pennsylvania Avenue. N.W. 

Washington. D.C. 20530-0001 

(202)514-2401/ (202)616-2645 (Fax) 

March 27,2012 

Re: Energy Conservation Standards 

Dear Deputy General Counsel Fygi: 

I am responding to your January 31,2012 letter seeking the views of the Attorney 

General about the potential impact on competition of proposed energy conservation 

standards for certain types of commercial heating, air-conditioning, and water-heating 

equipment. Specifically, you are proposing amended standards for small, large, and very 

large water-cooled and evaporatively-cooled commercial package air conditioners and 

variable refrigerant flow (VRF) water-source heat pumps less than 17,000 BtuIh, and 

proposing new standards for VRF water-source heat pumps greater than or equal to 

135,000 Btu/h and computer room air conditioners. Your request was submitted under 

Section 325(0)(2)(B)(i)(V) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended 

(ECPA), 42 U.S.C. 6295(0)(2)(B)(i)(5) and 42 U.S.C. 63l6(a), which requires the 

Attorney General to make a determination of the impact of any lessening of competition 

that is likely to result from the imposition of proposed energy conservation standards. 

The Attorney General's responsibility for responding to requests from other departments 

about the effect of a program on competition has been delegated to the Assistant Attorney 

General for the Antitrust Division in 28 CFR § 0.40(g). 

In conducting its analysis the Antitrust Division examines whether a proposed 

standard may lessen competition, for example, by substantially limiting consumer choice, 

by placing certain manufacturers at an unjustified competitive disadvantage, or by 

inducing avoidable inefficiencies in production or distribution of particular products. A 

lessening of competition could result in higher prices to consumers, and perhaps thwart 

the intent of the revised standards by inducing substitution to less efficient products. 
Eric J. Fygi 

March 27, 2012 

2 

We have reviewed the proposed standards contained in the Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (77 Fed. Reg. 2356, January 17, 2012). We have also reviewed 

supplementary information submitted to the Attorney General by the Department of 

Energy and listened by webinar to the February 14,2009 public hearing on the proposed 

standards. Based on this review, our conclusion is that the proposed energy conservation 

standards for the above-mentioned types of commercial heating, air-conditioning, and 

water-heating equipment are unlikely to have a significant adverse impact on 

competition. In reaching our conclusion, we note the absence of any competitive 

concerns raised by industry participants at the hearing and that these proposed energy 

standards correspond to the latest version of the relevant industry consensus standard. 

Acting Assistant Attorney General 

Antitrust Division
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-03-130-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.D.B., R.B., R.B., and R.B. 

	.

	----------

	FROM THE 325TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On May 20, 2003 and May 30, 2003 we notified appellant, in accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3, that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because it appears the notice of appeal was not timely filed.  We stated that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.

	Although appellant has responded to our jurisdiction letters, the responses do not state sufficient grounds for continuing the appeal.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). 

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	CAYCE, C.J.; DAY and LIVINGSTON, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 2619, 2003
#### JOHN THOMAS, Administrator, &c., Appellant, *vs.*HENRY W. SAVAGE, Respondent.

APPEAL FROM CRAWFORD COUNTY COURT.

After five or six years delay, this court will not go hack, upon a collateral proceeding, to hunt up technical errors or defects in the proceedings of inferior courts.

After five years from the rendition of judgment, on appeal to the circuit court, from the judgment of a justice of the peace, on a motion for execution upon the judgment, the court rightly refused to consider defects in the affidavit for the appeal.

A motion for execution upon a final judgment, and the decision of the court thereon, constitute no part of the record proper, and can only be considered in this court, when made part of the record by bill of exceptions.

The facts of this appeal are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

*D. II. Johnson*& *C. Dunn,*for the appellant.

*Bull*& *King*for the respondent.

*By the Court,*

Smith J.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court of Crawford county, made at the May term, 1858, awarding execution upon a judgment rendered therein, at the February term, 1853.

The action was replevin, commenced before a justice of the peace of Crawford county, and taken by appeal to the county court, and from thence removed to the circuit court, wherein upon trial upon the merits the defendant obtained judgment. *161No exceptions appear to have been taken to the proceedings on the trial in the court below. But now, after some five years, it is objected to the issuing of the execution on the judgment, for the reason that the affidavit for appeal is defective, in that it stated that the application for an appeal was .made, instead of stating that the appeal was taken in good faith, and that therefore the circuit court did not acquire jurisdiction of the case.

Under the rule established at an early period in the judicial history of this State, most probably the affidavit for an appeal made in this case would be held insufficient. But no objection was taken to it at the time. Nearly six years have elapsed, and now on a collateral proceeding to enforce the judgment, the defect is urged for the first time. We think it comes too late. It would be an unwelcome, profitless and tedious task for this court to go back and hunt up technical errors like this, which may have transpired in the proceedings of inferior courts.

But however this may be, we are precluded from considering the subject matter of the error assigned in the case, for the reason that it is not brought to the record by bill of exceptions. We have carefully inspected the record, and find no exceptions taken to the ruling of the court below. We cannot, therefore, notice it.

Order affirmed with costs.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Western  Transitions,  Inc.
(Formerly In Full Affect,  Inc.), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  Daniel L. Hodges, Chief Executive Officer and
Principal  Accounting  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: May 20, 2005

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1(a) CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy
Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes
of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the
best of my knowledge: (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly
 presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
 operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  Date: July 25, 2008
By:
/s/ BRUCE A. WILLIAMSONBruce A. WilliamsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer