alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2016

No. 04-15-00807-CR

Mark Allen WATSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-2380-CR-B

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 6, 2016, appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed an Anders brief. On 

October 19, 2016, appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw in support of 

the Anders brief. On October 21, 2016, we issued an order informing appellant that his counsel 

had filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. In our order, we noted that counsel had 

informed appellant of his right to review the appellate record and file his own brief, and had 

explained to appellant the procedure for obtaining the appellate record. We held counsel’s 

motion to withdraw in abeyance and we set the deadline for appellant to file his pro se brief, if 

any, for December 5, 2016.

On December 2, 2016, appellant filed a motion for pro se access to the appellate record. 

Appellant also requested an extension of time in order to “find an attorney.” 

We GRANT appellant’s motion for access to the appellate record. The Clerk of this 

Court is ORDERED to make a paper copy of the appellate record and mail it to appellant. We 

also GRANT appellant an extension of time for the purpose of filing his pro se brief. 

Appellant’s pro se brief, if any, is due on January 19, 2016. Absent extenuating 

circumstances, no further extensions will be granted. If no pro se brief is filed by January 19, 

2016, this appeal will be submitted without a pro se brief.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Acrongenomics
  Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
  the undersigned, Dr. Dimitri Goundis hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
  to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

May 22, 2008

| | /s/ Dimitri Goundis          
| | -----------------------------
| | Dr. Dimitri Goundis          
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Acrongenomics Inc. and will be retained by
Acrongenomics Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

LANSING 

DE~ RICK SNYDER 

GOVERNOR 

VIA E-MAIL AND U.S. MAIL 

September 18, 2015 

Dr. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator 

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5. 

77 West Jackson Boulevard (R-19J) 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507 

Dear Dr. Hedman: 

DAN WYANT 

DIRECTOR ' 

The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) is submitting its recommended 

designations for the 1-hour sulfur dioxide (S02) National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NMQS). These recommendations are based on the dispersion modeling of the eight large 

S02 sources identified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in a 

March 20, 2015, letter from Acting Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe. Specifically, the 

MDEQ is recommending a sub-county boundary in St. Clair County, Michigan, be 

designated as nonattainment, and the counties of Bay, Eaton, Ingham, Marquette, Monroe, 

and Ottawa be designated as attainment. 

The recommended geographical boundary of the St. Clair County nonattainment area was 

determined .using dispersion modeling, emissions-related data, meteorology, 

geography/topography and jurisdictional boundaries as outlined in the USEPA's guidance 

memorandum dated March 20, 2015. Our recommendations for the county level attainment 

areas follow the corresponding methodology in this same guidance. A description ofthe. 

MDEQ's analysis for both the nonattainment area and the attainment areas is provided in 

the enclosed Support Document for Sulfur Dioxide Designation Recommendations for the 

2010 S02 NMOS. 

Meeting the air quality standards is a very important aspect of-helping protect.lhe health of 

the citizens of the state of Michigan. Once the USEPA finalizes the designation process, the 

MDEQ will work expeditiously to develop a plan to bring our recommended St. Clair County 

nonattainment area back into attainment with the S02 NMQS. 

If you have additional questions regarding this matter, please contact Ms. Lynn Fiedler, 

Chief, Air Quality Division, at 517-284-6773; fiedlerl@michigan.gov; or MDEQ, P.O. Box 

30260, Lansing, Michigan 48909-7760; or you may contact me. · 

Enclosure 

CONSTITUTION HALL • 525 WEST ALLEGAN STREET • P.O. BOX 30473 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909·7973 

www.michigan.gov/deq • (BOO) 662·9278 
Dr. Susan Hedman 

Page2 

September 18, 2015 

cc/enc: Mr. George Czerniak, USEPA, Region 5 

Mr. John Summerhays, USEPA, Region 5 

Ms. Sarah Arra, USEPA, Region 5 

Mr. Jim Sygo, Chief Deputy Director, MDEQ 

Ms. Lynn Fiedler, MDEQ 

Mr. Robert Irvine, MDEQ
Order entered December 1, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00985-CV

MINH NGUYEN, Appellant

V.

TORINO ENGLISH, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-01041-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant Minh Nguyen’s November 28, 2016 motion for extension of 

time to file brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER the brief filed by December 29, 

2016. 

We caution appellant that any further motions before the Court must comply with the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00682-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.P.R. and J.C.R., Children

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-06574

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. We 

ORDER that appellant, Abel Castillo Rodriguez, bear all costs of this appeal. 

SIGNED December 7, 2016.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
n/03/201 1 101 2 FAX 2024935K 2 FAA r OMS 001/00 1 

SCHULT E B CDfE3iTthTl0iATTHRNEY S A T ln^^iS;PORTATIO^J 

Schulte Booth, PC. 

iuui Eilinrf srri^fT 

Baliinioi'.', M^fyl-irul 2'\22'\ 

4in.71-.M_li5 Telephnnr ' 

'1lO.,'J:^.i.nf' H-KSimilr 

www.'irhnilrrho.'iih.i-nin 

VIA CERTIFIFJ) MAIL 

•GCKhT OPtRATlOMo 

20!! fiOV - 3 A Ih 0 8 

Robert D. S<:hullp 

r^c^mll(;!i5lscl^^,'llobol>lh.( urn 

Al.in ]. BuOth 

oliiOi.>lii(ii.^!:'Jiullebuc.'lr..':nm 

Ociobcr5.20n 

RECEIVED 

OCT 12 21H1 

HEARING DOCKET 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence A^'enue, S.w. 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2WI000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Re: Adminislrator v. AvDyne Aerosep.*iccs, LLC 

FAA Case No. 2mOEA270032 

Proposed Civil Penalty V^l-^^ S ' 96? " - M ? I 

To WOiom It May Concern: 

'l"his Firm and the undersigned reprc-^ents AvUyne Acroservices, IJ.C with regard to the abovecaptioncd malier. All future correspondence regarding same should be directed to Robert D. 

Schulte, Esq. at the address indicated above. 

In accordance with the Administratoi"? Final Nolicc ol"Proposed Civil Peiiaitj' dated Scplember 

28, 2011 and the Rules of Practice for FAA Civil Penalty Proceedings, AvDvne Aerosei-viccs. 

LLC respectfully requests a hearing in this matter. 

A copy of this correspondence has been sent via e-mail .pdf to Edumnd Avenman. Esq. m 

cd.a^crman'^MiJa.gov. 

Please do call me with any questions regarding the foregoing. 

S/am_. " / 

__JyIr."Jerome Hodge (via e-mail/.pdf)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         123,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  313,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (11,413)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               479,441
<PP&E>                                       1,107,738
<DEPRECIATION>                               (746,966)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 890,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          359,504
<BONDS>                                         15,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,534
<OTHER-SE>                                     189,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   890,390
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,238,423
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,186,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   247
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
        

</TABLE>
Rev 0 (9/08) 

## Com **ments i**  **n Response to “**  **Final r**  **ule; r**  **equest for c**  **om ments**  **”**
**Docket: FAA**  **- 20**  **12 -**  **0296 Directorate Identifier**  **2010 -**  **- NM**  **- 106**  **- AD**  Comments have been received in response to : **“ Final rule; req**  **uest for comments,”** Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate I dentifier entered above. (Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. Once you have made your determination, please fill in the co mmenter(s) name(s) and check the appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, if necessary. Then **include your name and**  **the date**  in the spaces provided, and return it to the AD directorate focal. The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we re ceived from: LAN Airlines on 4/24/2012 **(Please check on**  **e**

**)** These comments **have not** been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or change of this AD. These comments **have** been found to contain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory

action. 

### (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual **FAA -**  **IR -**  **M -**  **8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)**

______Vladi mir Ulyanov

_____ 06/01/2012

__ Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 8, 2016

No. 04-16-00124-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.J.P.,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-00878

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The above appeal was set for submission on October 11, 2016, before the following 

panel: Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, and Justice Rebeca C. Martinez. This 

order is to inform all parties and their counsel that the panel has changed to the following: Justice 

Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, and Justice Jason Pulliam.

It is so ORDERED on December 8, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0726. MARIAN GORDON v. DORCHESTER MANAGEMENT, LLC

d/b/a STERLING PLACE APARTMENTS.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, Marian Gordon appealed to the superior court, which entered a writ

of possession in favor of Dorchester Management, LLC d/b/a Sterling Place

Apartments on January 21, 2016. Gordon then filed a notice of appeal on February

4, 2016.

1

 We lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, Gordon failed to file an application for discretionary appeal as required. 

“[A]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower courts

by certiorari or de novo proceedingsshall be by application for discretionary appeal.” 

Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003) (punctuation

omitted); see also OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Because Gordon did not follow the proper

procedure for requesting appellate review in this case, we lack jurisdiction over this

appeal. 

Second, Gordon’s appeal is untimely. Generally, a notice of appeal must be

filed within 30 days of entry of the decision or judgment sought to be appealed. See

OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The underlying subject matter of an appeal, however, controls

over the relief sought in determining the proper appellate procedure. See Rebich v.

Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d 192) (1994). The underlying subject matter

1 Gordon originally filed this appeal in the Georgia Supreme Court, which

transferred the case to this Court. See Case No. S17A0245 (decided October 3,

2016).

December 07, 2016
here is a dispossessory judgment. Under OCGA § 44-7-56, an appeal from a

dispossessory judgment must be filed within seven days of the date the judgment was

entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521, 522-523 (521 SE2d

456) (1999). Gordon’s appeal is untimely, as it was filed 14 days after the superior

court’s order was entered. For these reasons, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/07/2016
# C_2016001EN.01000101.xml

| 5.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 December 2015

(2016/C 1/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0887 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4626 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73395 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1895 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0835 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6030 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,98 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2639 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5240 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1765 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4897 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5116 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4376 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5923 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5417 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 280,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9530 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0608 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6380 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 039,99 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6959 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,999 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 80,6736 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,248 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3117 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,9145 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,0215 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0887

JPY

Japanese yen

131,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4626

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73395

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1895

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0835

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6030

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,98

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2639

RON

Romanian leu

4,5240

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1765

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4897

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5116

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4376

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5923

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5417

KRW

South Korean won

1 280,78

ZAR

South African rand

16,9530

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0608

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6380

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 039,99

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6959

PHP

Philippine peso

50,999

RUB

Russian rouble

80,6736

THB

Thai baht

39,248

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3117

MXN

Mexican peso

18,9145

INR

Indian rupee

72,0215

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit
13.1




CARTHEW
BAY TECHNOLOGIES INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Carthew Bay Technologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Michael Liik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Michael LiikMichael
      LiikPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerMay
      19, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

          - [Notice-MA-2015-01; Docket No. 2015-0002, Sequence No. 5]

# AGENCY:

Office of Government-wide Policy, U.S. General Services Administration (GSA).

# ACTION:

Notice of a bulletin.

# SUMMARY:

                        The purpose of this notice is to inform agencies that FTR Bulletin 15-03 pertaining to Relocation Allowances—Relocation Income Tax (RIT) Allowance Tables is now available online at                         *www.gsa.gov/​ftrbulletin.*

# DATES:

*Effective:*                         April 6, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Rick Miller, Office of Asset and Transportation Management (MA), Office of Government-wide Policy, GSA, at 202-501-3822 or via email at                         *rodney.miller@gsa.gov.*                         Please cite FTR Bulletin 15-03.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The GSA published FTR Amendment 2008-04 in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 73 FR 35952 on June 25, 2008, specifying that GSA would no longer publish the RIT Allowance tables in Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulation Part 302-17, Appendices A through D; instead, the tables would be available on a GSA Web site. FTR Bulletin 15-03: Relocation Allowances—Relocation Income Tax (RIT) Allowance Tables is now available and provides the annual changes to the RIT allowance tables necessary for calculating the amount of a transferee's increased tax burden due to his or her official permanent change of station. FTR Bulletin 15-03 and all other FTR Bulletins can be found at                     *www.gsa.gov/​ftrbulletin.*

Dated: March 30, 2015.

Giancarlo Brizzi,

Acting Associate Administrator,  Office of Government-wide Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-07866 Filed 4-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-14-P
# C_2016337EN.01000102.xml

| 14.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8118 — OpenGate Capital/Umicore Zinc Chemicals)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 337/02)

On 31 August 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8118. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8118. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---