alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1 Amendment to Employment Agreement




AMENDMENT TO
RESTATED AND SUPERSEDING EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
BY AND BETWEEN CHAD C. DEATON AND BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED




THIS AGREEMENT by and between Baker Hughes Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Chad C. Deaton (the “Executive”),


W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate a seamless and orderly succession plan in connection with the retirement of the Executive, the Executive has served as Executive Chairman of the Company for a limited period of time pursuant to the terms of the Restated and Superseding Employment Agreement by and between Chad C. Deaton and Baker Hughes Incorporated (the “Employment Agreement”);
WHEREAS, the Executive desires to retire effective April 25, 2013;
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect the Executive's retirement date;
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto mutually agree that, notwithstanding any other provision of the Employment Agreement, the Executive's employment with the Company shall terminate on April 25, 2013, and, accordingly, 
(1)    Section 4 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows:
  4.    Term of Employment as Executive Chairman.  The Company agrees to employ the Executive, and the Executive accepts such employment on the terms and conditions herein set forth, as Executive Chairman commencing on January 1, 2012 and continuing through April 25, 2013. The Executive shall retire, and, as a result, the employment relationship between the Company and the Executive shall end on April 25, 2013.
(2)    The Executive's “Date of Termination” for purposes of the provisions of section 9, subparts (b) and (c) of the 2009 Agreement is April 25, 2013.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed this 25th day of April, 2013. 
	
		
	BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED
	CHAD C. DEATON

	 
	 

	 
	 

	By:   /s/ Claire W. Gargalli        
	/s/ Chad C. Deaton

	Title:    Compensation Committee Chair
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ZAKEEM SINGLETON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 266 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of January, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

REBECCA CATHERINE STEIN

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 3041 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

(Allegheny County Court of Common 

Pleas, No. CP-02-CR-0007485-2023)

Attorney Registration No. 321862

(Allegheny County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5

th day of April, 2024, upon consideration of the Joint Petition to 

Temporarily Suspend an Attorney, the rule to show cause entered on March 25, 2024, is 

discharged, and the Joint Petition is granted. Rebecca Catherine Stein is placed on 

temporary suspension, see Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(5), and shall comply with the provisions of 

Pa.R.D.E 217.
Exhibit 12.2  Section 302 Certification  I, John ODonovan, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Bank of Ireland;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely


affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: 24 June 2011Name:
John ODonovanTitle:
Chief Financial Officer Bank of Ireland
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of PLXTechnology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Michael J. Salameh,****Chief Executive Officer****of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of myknowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,"filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: November 4, 2005
                          /s/ Michael J.Salameh	 
Michael J. Salameh, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I,Hugh J. Garchinsky, Chief Executive Officer of Peoples First, Inc.,certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Peoples First, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-(e)) forthe registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision,  toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

----

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)   All significant deficienciesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial report.

 

 

Date:  May 11, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/ Hugh J.  Garchinsky  |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Hugh J.  Garchinsky      |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

2

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 8, 2016

No. 04-16-00359-CV

PRIORITY TOWING, INC.,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC-13-58

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellee’s motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is 

extended to January 6, 2017.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Winter Wheat 2022

Yield Per Harvested Acre by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Bushels Per Acre

Not Estimated

< 20

20 - 39.9

40 - 59.9

60 - 79.9

80 - 99.9

100 +
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00408-CV

In the Interest of D.T., a Child §

§

§

§

From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-102895-16)

December 1, 2016

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>				5
<LEGEND>				This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the consolidated Statements of Operations and Balance
Sheets and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. 

<MULTIPLIER>                               1
<CURRENCY>			US Dollars
<PERIOD-START>			JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>			6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>		DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>			JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    	1
<CASH>				10,013
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>			0
<ALLOWANCES>			0
<INVENTORY>			0	
<CURRENT-ASSETS>		284,030
<PP&E>		8,305						
<DEPRECIATION>			4,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			5,133,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>		10,969,036
<BONDS>				0
<COMMON>				27,803,255
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	0					
<PREFERRED>			0
<OTHER-SE>	(33,639,010)							
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	5,133,281		
<SALES>				0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>		0
<CGS>				0
<TOTAL-COSTS>			0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	268,066			
<LOSS-PROVISION>		0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		0
<INCOME-PRETAX>		(268,066)
<INCOME-TAX>			0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>		(268,066)
<DISCONTINUED>			(13,570,374)
<EXTRAORDINARY>		0			
<CHANGES>				0	
<NET-INCOME>			(13,838,440)
<EPS-PRIMARY>   (2.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>      		(2.90)

</TABLE>
page1

 

 

 

 



 

 

page2

 

 

 

 



 

 

page3

 

 

 



 

 

page4

 

 

 



 

 

page5

 

 

 



 

 

page6

 

 

 



 

 

page7

 

 

 



 

 

page8

 

 

 



 

 

page9

 

 

 



 

 

page10

 

 

 



 

 

page11

 

 

 



 

 

page12

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

page13

 

 

 

 



 

 

page14

 

 

 

 



 

 

page15

 

 

 

 



 

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Alfonso Hernandez a/k/a * From the 35th District Court

Alfonso Darden, of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CR22628.

Vs. No. 11-14-00325-CR * November 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
null

2016-12-05

401.95276

eng - Argued: 2016-12-05. Docket number: 15-50427
<PAGE> 13


FiNet.com CONSOLIDATES WESTERN BUSINESS UNITS IN NEW HEADQUARTERS
AT BISHOP RANCH TO EXPAND OPERATIONS

WALNUT CREEK, CA, September 15, 1999 - FiNet.com Inc. (NASDAQ:
FNCM) owner and operator of www.FiNet.com, "America's Home Finance
Network," today announced it has begun moving its corporate
headquarters from Walnut Creek, California, to the Bishop Ranch
office park in San Ramon, California. The company is consolidating
all West Coast divisions and departments, including Wholesale and
Retail lending, Finance and Accounting, Marketing, Information
Technology, Research and Development, Human Resources, Facilities,
and company Executives into one building. The West Coast retail
division has already been relocated to the new Electronic
Fulfillment Center at Bishop Ranch, while the remaining divisions
will move in phases through November 1999.

"This move enables FiNet.com to expand its operations, create a
high-tech Electronic Fulfillment Center, and build a technology
infrastructure unparalleled in the industry," said Mark Korell,
Chairman and CEO of FiNet.com.

The facility is also large enough to house FiNet.com's expanding
employee base. More than 160 FiNet.com employees will re-locate to
the Bishop Ranch location, with space available for more than 90
new employees the company expects to hire over the next eighteen
months.

The company has leased 40,000 square feet of office space at
Bishop Ranch 7, located at 2527 Camino Ramon, Suite 200. Bishop
Ranch is a well-known hub for high-tech businesses and large
corporations such as Pacific Bell, Chevron, PeopleSoft, Lucent
Technologies and NextCard. FiNet.com management hopes to draw from
the highly skilled labor market in the San Ramon Valley.

"There are many benefits to this strategic move to Bishop Ranch,"
said Tom Porter, EVP, Administration for FiNet.com. "We've been
able to secure a premier location, excellent technology
infrastructure, and favorable financial terms."

About FiNet.com
FiNet.com, Inc., "America's Home Finance Network" including its
wholly owned subsidiaries (the "Company"), is a leading provider
of e-commerce home financing services that facilitates home
ownership through a variety of technology-based products and
automated services for consumers and mortgage broker businesses.
The Company offers automated financing solutions directly to
consumers through its www.interloan.com on-line home financing web
site and to mortgage broker businesses through Monument Mortgage.

Safe Harbor
Certain statements in this press release, including statement
regarding the anticipated development and expansion of the
Company's business, and the intent, belief or current expectations
of the Company, its directors or its officers, are "forward-
looking" statements (as such term is defined in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Because such statements
are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ
materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 314 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.314

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
             To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Repeal 
Act''.
SEC. 2. REPEAL.
    Public Law 89-224 (commonly known as the ``Klamath Tribe Judgment 
Fund Act'') (79 Stat. 897) is repealed.
SEC. 3. DISBURSEMENT OF REMAINING FUNDS.
    Notwithstanding any provision of Public Law 89-224 (79 Stat. 897) 
(as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) 
relating to the distribution or use of funds, as soon as practicable 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall disburse to the Klamath Tribe the balance of any funds that, on 
or before the date of enactment of this Act, were appropriated or 
deposited into the trust accounts for remaining legal fees and 
administration and per capita trust accounts, as identified by the 
Secretary of the Interior, under that Act (as in effect on the day 
before the date of enactment of this Act).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07660]



[[Page 18269]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-
Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: April 3, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 13, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request 
of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Express, 
Priority Mail, & First-Class Package Service Contract 3 to Competitive 
Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. 
MC2014-27, CP2014-53.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2015-07660 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
I 

# /I. ·FAX: DATE: 

### APRIL 22, 2012 

### TO: FEDERAl

### AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FAX: 202-493-2251 

### FM: DEWITT T. 

### FERRELl, JR FAX: 423-744-7169 .. -,11**DTI.~EN-1** 

### OF .k::tr\.; d !VI ·. 

## :**·~;~NSPORTATJON** \!""·'{[TI**(',.p;:nnt~Tl!Q!\\0)-· ·~.:**  ·,_IJ \ ._, J L 11 ''\ 111\. 

### lU! 

### l :lAY ! 

### l P I: 5 l



### SUBJ; FAA AIRWORTHINESS 

### DIRECTIVE CRANKSHAFT REPLACEMENT FOR tYCOM1NG ·ENGINES 

### 1. COULDYOU TELL 

### ME IF LYCOMING ENGINE: 10-360

### A386D s/N L-28510-SlA 

### IS AFFECTED 

### BY THE 

### FAA CRANKSHAFT 

### REPlANC£MENT AD AD? THANK YOU ••••



### DEWITI T. FERREll, JR. E-MAIL: Ferrell@usit.net**Oev~itt** 

### T. Ferret!. 

### Jr. P.O. Box206 789 Highway 39 East Athens, TN 37371-0206
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-30,349-03

IN RE DAVID LEE COOPER, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1434976-A IN THE 232 DISTRICT COURT ND

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus in the 232nd District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed,

and that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court. Relator contends that the district

court ordered a response from trial counsel on January 25, 2019, but counsel has not complied. 

Additionally, the court has not entered an ODI or timely forwarded the habeas application to this

Court.

Respondent, the Judge of the 232 District Court of Harris County, shall file a response with nd
2

this Court by having the District Clerk submit the record on such habeas corpus application. In the

alternative, Respondent may obtain a response from trial counsel and then have the District Clerk

submit the record on such application. In either case, Respondent’s answer shall be submitted within

30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held

in abeyance until Respondent has submitted his response.

Filed: August 21, 2019

Do not publish