alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03191

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03191\03191_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03191\03191_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03191\03191_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03191\03191_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03191\03191_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03191\03191_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03191\03191_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03191\03191_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03191\Certification Statement Plant ID 03191.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03191\Plant Contact\03191_FollowUpQuestions.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 03191\Plant Contact\RE Steam Electric Questionnaire Follow-up - Four Corners Power Plant - Plant ID 03191.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 03191\Plant Contact\Steam Electric Questionnaire Follow Up_FGD Complete Recycle.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 03191\Supplemental Documents\03191_A2_Q3_ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03191\Supplemental Documents\03191_A5_Q3_WaterBalance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03191\Supplemental Documents\03191_D3.1_Q1_WWTDIAGRAMPOND1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03191\Supplemental Documents\03191_D3.1_Q1_WWTDIAGRAMPOND2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03191\Supplemental Documents\03191_D3.1_Q1_WWTDIAGRAMPOND3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03191\Supplemental Documents\03191_Map1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03191\Supplemental Documents\03191_Map2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03191\Supplemental Documents\03191_Map3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03191\Supplemental Documents\03191_CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         444,963
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,021,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,255,238
<INVENTORY>                                     53,405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,324,172
<PP&E>                                         706,208
<DEPRECIATION>                                 336,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,725,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,713,609
<BONDS>                                        392,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,016,620
<COMMON>                                           409
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,396,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,725,738
<SALES>                                     24,161,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,161,819
<CGS>                                        2,450,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,450,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            28,719,892
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,656,597
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,771
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,668,018)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,668,018)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,668,018)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.41)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 66 (Tuesday, April 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and section 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 22, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Eric Ross Allen, Los Angeles, California; to acquire voting 
shares of Rum River Bancorporation, Inc., Milaca, Minnesota, and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The First National Bank of 
Milaca, Milaca, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 2, 2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-07902 Filed 4-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### EBENEZER HEALD, Respondent, *vs.*ANDREW S. WELLS, Appellant.

APPEAL PROM THE RACINE CIRCUIT COURT.

The ease not showing what evidence was used upon the trial, or that any exceptions were taken, the presumption is, that the court rendered judgment upon sufficient testimony.

The party bringing up a cause, either upon appeal or writ of error, must show error in the proceedings in the court helow. And this applies under the code as well to what were chancery proceedings under the old system, as to what were known as common law actions.

*Paine*<§' Millet, for the Appellant.

*Wm. P.*Lyon, for the Respondent.

*By the Court,*

Cole, J.

The second point made by the counsel, for the respondent, on his brief, filed, disposes of this case. It does not appear, either from the printed case or the record sent up from the circuit court, that any exceptions were taken to the ruling of that court on the trial of the action; neither does it appear that the testimony taken before the commissioner was used at all on the trial. The record not showing what the evidence was, or that any exception was taken to it, the presumption is, that the circuit court rendered judgment upon sufficient and competent testimony. The party bringing up a case must show error in the court below, and under the code this applies as well to what was a chancery case under the old practice, as to what were known as common law actions. The judgment of the circuit court affirmed with costs.
1 Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc.

4380 SW Macadam Ave.

Suite 515

Portland, OR 97239

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com

U.S. Department of Transportation January 12, 2016

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Amendment to Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. Exemption No. 11467

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0261

Dear Sir or Madam:

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. (AIR) request amendment to our FAA Exemption No. 11467,

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0261 for the purpose of conducting commercial UAS operations. AIR is

requesting the authority to o perate all aircraft listed on FA A Exemption No. 11467 to include the ability

to operate with a tethered line attached to the aircraft.

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this

document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 503

- 312

- 9804 or via emai l at

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com

.

Thank you,

Drew Pairamore

Director of Regulatory Compliance

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc.2
#### MARTIN BLODGET, Appellant, *vs.*ANNA HATFIELD, Appellee.

APPEAL IN EQUITY FROM MARQUETTE CIROUIT COURT.

A party has two months from the filing of a final decree in which to take and perfect his appeal. The time dates from the filing, not from the pronouncing of the decree.

An appeal which purported to have been taken from a final decree, and on inspection, no such decree could be found on file, nor incorporated in the record, was dismissed.

This purported to be an appeal from a final decree of tbe Circuit Court of Marquette county, dismissing tbe complainant’s bill of complaint. The cause was submitted by tbe appellant on printed case and brief, made upon the supposition that such final decree bad been made and filed, but upon examination of tbe record, none could be found. Tbe appeal was therefore dismissed. The orders of tbe court below, referring to tbe case, are stated in tbe opinion.

*A.*Hand, for the appellant.

*By the Court,*

Smith, J.

Tbe counsel in tbis case, as well as tbe court below must have misapprehended tbe state of tbe record in tbe case.

We find that on tbe 28th day of March, at tbe March term, 1856, of the Marquette circuit, tbis cause was brought on for bearing, and that after bearing it was “ ordered by tbe court, that tbe said cause be laid oyer and continued until the next term of tbis court, for the purpose of.procuring further testimony, on tbe payment of tbe defendant’s costs up to tbis time by tbe complainant.”

*78This order is dated tbe 28th day of March, 1856, and there is nothing of record to show that it has ever been, vacated, altered or modified, but for aught that appears remains in full force. Nor was this order appealed from by the complainant or any oue else.

The appeal presented for consideration appears to have been taken from a final decree dismissing the complainant’s bill; the bond for appeal recites such a decree, or refers to it, and there is an order of the court fixing the amount of security to be given on appeal, and this order also recites that the bill was dismissed, but is not itself a decree. It is dated March 28, 1856. But there is no final decree to be found. None is on file among the papers, or incorporated in the record: and indeed we do not see how a final decree could have been made on that day, while the order continuing the cause to the next term remained in force. There is undoubtedly a mistake, the party supposing a final decree had been rendered against her. As, however, we can find no decree or order to which the- appeal can be applied, it must be dismissed.

The party has two months from the time of *filing*a final decree, in which to take and perfect his appeal. No such decree has been filed in this case. The time limited for appeal dates from the filing, not from the pronouncing of the decree.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sangui Biotech International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Striepe, Chief Executive Officer and I, Joachim Fleing, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    Dated: October 3, 2011 /s/ Thomas Striepe By: Thomas Striepe Chief Executive Officer   Dated: October 3, 2011 /s/ Joachim Fleing By: Joachim Fleing Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FOREWORD 

by Barry L. Ford, Survey Sampling Branch 

Probability! Variance! Estimator! These words strike fear into the hearts of people who have 

little mathematical training but wish to understand the statistical concepts of surveys. They view 

statistics as an alien world where people express themselves with formulas instead of sentences. 

They wonder, "Can I ever understand the ideas that govern statistics without involving myself in 

mathematical details?". 

In truth, the statistical community has not made it easy for outsiders. It has devoted only a small 

effort towards informing the nontechnical reader. Also, mathematical jargon and poor 

communication skills have always plagued the world of mathematical statistics. Also, I am 

always surprised at the number of mathematical statisticians who can apply precise mathematical 

logic to derive complex formulas but can not explain in plain English the motivation, usefulness, 

and impact of their ideas. This deficiency is not only a matter of speaking and writing skills but 

also a matter of thinking about the philosophy and application of the statistical procedures they 

use. 

I have always believed that the major ideas and underlying motivation for most statistical 

concepts could be expressed in an interesting, nontechnical way for the average "person-on-thestreet." In March 1988, that belief was put to the test. I was named as editor for a series of 

statistical articles to appear in the monthly "Staff Letter." Mathematical statisticians in NASS 

were assigned to write two-page articles on a list of statistical topics important to surveys. 

There were three factors that I looked for when editing these articles: 1) an effort to make the 

concepts understandable to someone who had never taken a statistics course, 2) no formulas, and 

3) an entertaining approach. For the writers - technicians who had been taught through many 

years of college training to think in rigidly mathematical terms - this assignment was often 

torturous. However, two purposes were served: 1) to challenge the mathematical statisticians to 

communicate technical concepts at a nontechnical level and 2) to inform the general reader about 

statistical topics that are crucial to the work of NASS. 

The reader will find varying degrees of success in the writing of the articles, but overall I think 

that the writers did a good job. Statistics is and always will be a branch of mathematics - thus, 

some of the topics were more difficult to tackle than others. However, I hope the reader will 

enjoy and learn from them all. 

Editor’s note 2008 (Dave Aune) 

The following articles were originally written in 1989 to communicate key statistical concepts of 

NASS surveys to nontechnical readers. Authors were told to not lose sight of the target audience 

and to be creative in their presentation. In 2008, these articles were edited to replace dated 

references and examples. The authors listed are the original authors.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

Nos. 11

- 2767, 11

- 4032 & 13

- 1084

________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RICHARD CORBIN

a/k/a ASHEED

a/k/a SHEED

a/k/a RICHARD RASHEED CORBIN

Richard Corbin,

Appell ant (Nos. 11

- 2767 & 13

- 1084)

________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOHNNIE CORLEY,

a/k/a

BLACK,

a/k/a

C,

a/k/a

CURLEY

Johnnie Corley,

Appellant (No. 11

- 4032)

________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Criminal Action Nos. 2

- 10

- cr

- 00352

- 002/003)

District Judge: Honorable Michael M. Baylson

________________2 Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

November 18, 2014

Befo re: AMBRO, SCIRICA, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed April 21, 2015)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the Not Precedential Opinion in the above case filed

April 21, 2015, be amended as follows:

On page 8 , footnote 2, starting twelfth line down, each time the name “Corbin”

appears, replace it with “Corley” so that the text will read:

“.

. . jeopardy; (9) Corley’s challenges to the grand jury proceedings; (10); Corley’s

argument that the trial proceedings caused a variance; (11) Corley’s claims relating to the

Government’s introduction of evidence regarding his cell phone usage at or near the time

of the robberies; and (12) Corley’s attack on the jury instructions.”

By the Court,

s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: February 4, 2016
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 21, 2010 

# Order

September 21, 2010

139350 (68)

CONNIE COLAIANNI, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, SC: 139350 v COA: 282587 Oakland CC: 2003-051245-NO STUART FRANKEL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC ., and K-F LAND COMPANY, LLC IV, Defendants-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants.

________________ _________________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion by the Neglig ence Section of the State Bar of Michigan for l eave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is considered, and it is

GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF


VYYO INC.





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vyyo Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Davidi Gilo, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David Aber, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





/s/    DAVIDI GILODavidi Gilo Chief Executive
Officer








November
4, 2002





/s/    DAVID ABERDavid Aber Chief Financial
Officer





November 4, 2002
& b 8

6

Ÿ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  ̇. Allegro

f

 ̇. œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

œ

>

For ceremonial version,

jump to m.100, 2nd beat

fi

J

œ

^

‰ ‰

œ.

F  ̇.

5

œ. œ.  ̇. j

œ

‰ ‰

œ œ œ œ. œ.

& b

œ. œ.  ̇. j

œ

‰ ‰

œ.  ̇.

13

œ

j

#œ

- œ

- œ œ  ̇. œ ‰

œ œ

j

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.

& b

 ̇. jœ

‰ ‰

œ.  ̇.

21

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ  ̇. œ ‰ œ nœ

j

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇.

& b j

œ

‰ ‰

œ.  ̇.

29

œ œ

- œ- œ œ œ  ̇. j

œ

‰ ‰

nœ

j

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. œ ‰œ œ

j

œ

& b

 ̇.

37

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ  ̇. j

œ

‰ ‰

œ

j

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. œ‰

œ œ

j

œ

 ̇.

45

& b

œ

j

#œ

- œ

j

œ  ̇. œ ‰œ œ

j

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. œ ‰œ œ

j

œ  ̇.

53

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ

& b

 ̇. œ ‰ œ nœ

j

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. j

œ

‰ ‰

œ.  ̇.

61

œ œ

- œ- œ œ œ  ̇.

& b j

œ

‰ ‰

nœ

j

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. œ ‰œ œ

j

œ  ̇.

69

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ  ̇. j

œ

‰ ‰

œ œ œ

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

The Official Song of the National Guard Bureau Words and Music by

CW4 David A. Myers

 40th Army Band, VTARNG

2nd Bb Clarinet

Dedicated to the Men and Women, Soldiers and Airmen of America's National Guard
& b

œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇. œ

‰

œ œ

j

œ

 ̇.

77

œ

j

#œ

- œ

j

œ  ̇. œ ‰œ œ

j

œ œ. œ.

& b

œ. œ.  ̇. œ ‰

œ œ

j

œ  ̇.

85

œ

j

œ œ

j

œ  ̇. œ ‰ œ nœ œœ œ. œ. œ. œ.

& b

 ̇. jœ

‰ ‰

œ.  ̇.

93

œ œ

- œ- œ œ œ  ̇. j

œ

‰ ‰

nœ

j

œ œ. œ. œ. œ.  ̇.

& b

Ÿ Ÿ~~ fi ~~

j

œ

‰ ‰

œ œ œ œ œ œ

Ceremonial version,

from m.4

f

œ œ œ œ

œ nœ

101

œ œ #œ œ. Œœ nœ œ œ #œ œ œœœ. ‰

œ œ œ œ œ

& b

Ÿ~~~ Ÿ~~~~~

œ œ #œ œ œ nœ œ

œ œ œ œ œ œ. J

œ

‰ ‰ Œ

œ #œ œ œ nœ

109

œ

œ#œ œ.

& b

Ÿ~~~ Œ

œ nœ œ

œ#œ œ œ#œ œ. œ

>

‰ œ

> j nœ œ

>

‰ œ

> j nœ œ

>

bœ œ œ œ œ œ œ œ

œ œ œ œ œ œ

& b

Ÿ Ÿ~~~ ~~~ Ÿ~~~~~  ̇.

Œ

œ œ œ

œ nœ

117

œ œ #œ œ. Œœ nœ œ œ #œ œ œœœ. ‰

œ œ œ œ œ

& b

Ÿ~~~~~

œ œ #œ œ œ œ œ

J

œ œ J

œ  ̇. œ

>

‰ œ

> j #œ œ

>

‰ œ

>

125

j #œ œ

>

#œ œ œ œ œ œ

>

‰ œ

> j nœ œ

>

‰ œ

>

& b

Ÿ~~~~~~ >

 ̇. œ

>

œ œ œ œ œ œ

>

œ œ œ œ œ

>

 ̇.

sfp

 ̇. œ. œ œ œ œ œ œ

J

œ

^

‰ ‰ Œ.

ƒ

ALWAYS READY, ALWAYS THERE

-2nd Bb 2 Clarinet-
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that
the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the registrant.

|                      |  | /s/DR. KARI STEFANSSONDr. Kari Stefansson
President and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 16, 2005 |  |                                                                                
|                      |  | /s/LANCE THIBAULTLance Thibault
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer          
|Dated: March 16, 2005 |  |                                                                                

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been furnished to deCODE genetics, Inc. and will be retained by deCODE genetics, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks