alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4940]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2012 / 
Notices

[[Page 12553]]

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Hawaii Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that the Hawaii Advisory 
Committee (Committee) to the Commission will meet on Wednesday, March 
14, 2012. The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. and adjourn on or about 3 
p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to plan future Committee activities. 
The meeting will be held at the Aina Haina Public Library, 5246 
Kalanianaole Highway, Honolulu, HI 96821.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the Western Regional Office of the 
Commission by Monday, April 16, 2012. The address is Western Regional 
Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 300 N. Los Angeles Street, 
Suite 2010, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Persons wishing to email their 
comments, or to present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who 
desire additional information should contact Angelica Trevino, Office 
Manager, Western Regional Office, at (213) 894-3437, (or for hearing 
impaired TDD 913-551-1414), or by email to atrevino@usccr.gov. Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office at the above 
email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, February 25, 2012.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2012-4940 Filed 2-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Rev 0 (9/08)

Comments in Response to 

“Final rule; request for comments”

Docket: FAA-2012-0296 Directorate Identifier 2010--NM-106-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “Final rule; request for comments,”

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted.

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal.

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: 

LAN Airlines on 4/24/2012

(Please check one)

 These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD.

 These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

______Vladimir Ulyanov_____ 06/01/2012__

Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  |                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    BRUCE A.
WILLIAMSON
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  | Bruce A. Williamson Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Kelly Tucek, the Chief Financial Officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/____________________________________

Name: Kelly Tucek

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 2, 2002
www.nass.usda.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection
with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson, Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as
of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)
the Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
 applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
 the dates and for the periods indicated.  Date: August
 7, 2008
By:
/s/ BRUCE
 A. WILLIAMSONBruce A. WilliamsonChairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive
Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00390-CV

MICHAEL REDLICH APPELLANT

V.

STONEWOOD RANCH APPELLEE

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CV-2014-02521

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On December 10, 2014, we notified Appellant Michael Redlich of our 

concern that we lack jurisdiction over his attempt to appeal from a county court 

order sustaining a contest to his affidavit of inability to pay and denying an appeal 

to the county court from an adverse judgment in the justice court. See Tex. R. 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Civ. P. 510.9(a), (c)(1)‒(3). Redlich filed a response, but it does not show

grounds for continuing the appeal.

“Unless a statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal, appellate courts 

generally only have jurisdiction over final judgments.” CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 

S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011). We are aware of no statute that authorizes an 

appeal to this court from the county court’s decision on appeal from the justice 

court denying Redlich’s attempt to appeal without furnishing a bond or paying a

cash deposit. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 510.9(c)(4) (stating only that if county court 

denies appeal, the appellant may post an appeal bond or make a cash deposit); 

McGaughy v. Lamm, No. 03-99-00643-CV, 2000 WL 147649, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Austin Feb. 10, 2000, no pet.) (“We find no statute authorizing appeal to us from 

the county court’s decision on appeal from the justice court rejecting McGaughy’s 

attempt to appeal without paying costs; it is not among the list of appealable 

interlocutory orders.”); see also Torrance-Bey v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 02-13-

00131-CV, 2013 WL 5517906, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 3, 2013, no 

pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing attempted appeal from county court order sustaining 

contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigency seeking to proceed in trial court 

without prepayment of costs). Accordingly, because the order is neither a final 

judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss this appeal for want 

of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM
3

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: January 15, 2015
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3162 

To clarify the authority of States to use National Guard members performing 

Active Guard and Reserve duty during State-directed responses to domestic incidents. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2021 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To clarify the authority of States to use National Guard 

members performing Active Guard and Reserve duty during State-directed responses to domestic incidents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard Emer5 gency Response Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3162 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF STATES TO USE NATIONAL GUARD 

2 MEMBERS PERFORMING ACTIVE GUARD AND 

3 RESERVE DUTY DURING STATE-DIRECTED 

4 RESPONSES TO DOMESTIC INCIDENTS. 

5 Section 328(b) of title 32, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘A member’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) Under regulations prescribed by the Chief of the 

11 National Guard Bureau, the adjutant general of the juris12 diction concerned may authorize a member of the National 

13 Guard performing duty under subsection (a) to perform 

14 additional duties in response to a State-declared emer15 gency or disaster provided that the adjutant general deter16 mines that members performing such additional duties will 

17 derive a benefit that satisfies or complements training re18 quirements for the wartime mission or other training ob19 jectives of the members’ unit.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated January 29, 1999 on the financial statements of JDR Holdings, Inc.
and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998 included in this Form
10-K, into NCO Group, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-42743), (File 333-62131), (File No. 333-73087), (File No.
333-83229) and (File No. 333-87493) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-86473).


                                             /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Philadelphia, Pa.,
March 15, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule  contains summary financial information  extracted from the balance
sheets and statements of income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          4,069,687
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     519,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,261,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                         15,982,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,683,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,621,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,683,089
<SALES>                                         1,331,766 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9,492,355
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,220,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  618,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  805,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                490,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,272,098
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,272,098
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,272,098
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        6.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        6.97
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Ed
Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting of LightTouch Vein
& Laser, Inc.. (“the Registrant”) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge, based upon the review of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 28,  2008
            /s/ Ed
      Bailey


Ed
      Bailey


Chief
      Executive Officer


And
      Principal Accounting Officer











* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 66 (Tuesday, April 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07861]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute Notice of Charter Renewal

    In accordance with title 41 of the U.S. Code of Federal 
Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), notice is hereby given that the 
Charter for the Frederick National Advisory Committee to the National 
Cancer Institute was renewed for an additional two-year period on March 
30, 2015.
    It is determined that the Frederick National Advisory Committee to 
the National Cancer Institute, is in the public interest in connection 
with the performance of duties imposed on the National Cancer Institute 
and the National Institutes of Health by law, and that these duties can 
best be performed through the advice and counsel of this group.
    Inquiries may be directed to Jennifer Spaeth, Director, Office of 
Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892 (Mail code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#512221303425393b113e357f3f38397f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f2c2f3e3a2b37351f303b7131363771383029">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 1, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-07861 Filed 4-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Watkins *against*Haight.

The act reía-e'rror on judg-Courts ofCom-pa°ssedle^n7 ^acif.^ra.Tis *peciivt: ret>but*prospective

IN ERROR to the Court of C. P. of *Steuben*county, On the 20th of *June,*1815,- a rule for judgment was entered in the Court below ; and on the 28th *oí June,*the judgment record was signed, filed, and docketed. The writ of error, was *es£ed *J^ay*lst> 1820, directed to the Court below, and returnable to this Court on the first *Monday*of the present term. The writ and return were filed in the office of the clerk of this Court, on the 26th day of *June,*1820.

*139*Collier,*for the defendant in error,

now moved to quash the writ of error, on the ground of the statute of limitations, passed *April*5th, 1817, (sess. 40. ch. 179.) which declares, “ that all writs of error upon judgment, in any Court of Common Pleas or Mayor’s Court, shall be brought within *Jive years*after rendering such judgments, and not after.” Here the rule for judgment was entered the 20th of *June,*1815, and the writ of error was filed the 26th of *June,*1820, so that the five years had elapsed after rendering the judgment. Though the English Courts will not, on motion, quash a writ of error, it is because the statute of 10 and 11 *W.*III. c. 14. contains exceptions of infants and others. *{Tidd Pr.*1064, 1065.) But our statute contains no exception whatever; and this Court will not look beyond our own statute. (3 *Johns. Rep.*253.) The statute begins to run from the time of rendering the judgment, and not from the time the judgment roll is signed and filed. *{Arnold*v. *Sandford,*14 *Johns. Rep.*417. 424.)

*M‘Kown,*contra.

The writ of error was tested the 13th of *May,*1820, and filed the 26lh of *June,*and the judgment was docketted the 28th of *June,*1815, so that five years had not elapsed. But if the period of limitation had elapsed, we contend that the act is clearly prospective and not retrospective. It was passed in 1817, and was a new enactment; for the former statute of limitations was silent as to writs of error to Courts of Common Pleas. Though the act itself contains no words to show the intent of the legislature in this respect, yet the only rational and sound construction of it, is to consider it altogether prospective, and as intended to operate only on judgments rendered after the passing of the act. By any other construction, it would be manifestly unjust and unequal in its operation. Besides, on the principles recognised by this Court in the case of *Dash*v. *Van Kleeck,*(9 *Johns. Rep.*493..500.) the statute would be unconstitutional, and void as a retrospective or *ex post facAo*law.

*Collier,*in reply, said,

that the act was intended to quicken suitors and quiet judgments, andas it contained no words to *140the contrary, it must be construed so as to have effect on all judgments then existing, as well as on those to be rendered afterwards.

*Per Curiam.*

The case of *Dash v. Van Kleeck,*shows that it would be unjust and against the sound principles of legislation, to consider the act as retrospective. It must be deemed prospective merely; and the motion, therefore, is denied.

Motion denied*
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2696 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2696

   To require States and local jurisdictions that institute vaccine 
    passports to require voter identification in Federal elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            August 10, 2021

  Mr. Cramer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require States and local jurisdictions that institute vaccine 
    passports to require voter identification in Federal elections.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vaccine Passport and Voter ID 
Harmonization Act''.

SEC. 2. VOTER IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR STATES AND LOCAL 
              JURISDICTIONS THAT INSTITUTE VACCINE PASSPORTS.

    (a) Requirement.--Title III of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 
(52 U.S.C. 21081 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 304 and section 305 as section 
        305 and 306, respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after section 303 the following new 
        section:

``SEC. 304. VOTER IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR STATES AND LOCAL 
              JURISDICTIONS THAT INSTITUTE VACCINE PASSPORTS.

    ``(a) In General.--A State or jurisdiction that institutes a 
requirement for vaccine passports or other such documentation with 
respect to a COVID-19 vaccine shall, in any election for Federal office 
held during any period in which such requirement is in effect, require 
voter identification.
    ``(b) Effective Date.--Each State and jurisdiction shall be 
required to comply with the requirements of this section with respect 
to elections for Federal office held on or after January 1, 2022.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment Relating to Enforcement.--Section 401 of 
such Act (52 U.S.C. 21111) is amended by striking ``and 303'' and 
inserting ``303, and 304''.
    (c) Clerical Amendments.--The table of contents of such Act is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating the items relating to sections 304 and 
        305 as relating to sections 305 and 306, respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after the item relating to section 303 the 
        following new item:

``Sec. 304. Voter identification requirement for States and local 
                            jurisdictions that institute vaccine 
                            passports.''.
                                 <all>
```