alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Junod v. Bader

February 3, 1982

*Thomas E. Coval,*for plaintiff.

*Lawrence R.*Scheetz, for defendant.

BIUNNO, J.,

The instant matter came before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff commenced this action in trespass for malicious prosecution alleging that defendant had maliciously executed an affidavit to a private criminal complaint against plaintiff resulting in plaintiffs being charged with the criminal offenses of harassment and terroristic threats. Plaintiff further alleged that defendant knew that the facts in the said complaint were false.

After being charged with the above criminal offenses by the prosecuting authority in Philadelphia County, defendant was accepted for Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) as provided in rules of Criminal Procedure 175-185.

On April 30, 1981, after the successful completion of a three month ARD program, plaintiff was discharged as to these offenses.

In order to prevail in an action for malicious prosecution a plaintiff must establish that the underlying criminal proceeding was terminated in *150his favor. Restatement (Second) of Torts §658.

Where a compromise terminates the underlying criminal proceeding it has not been terminated in favor of plaintiff. “Although the accused by his acceptance of a compromise does not admit his guilt, the fact of compromise indicates that the question of his guilt or innocence is left open. Having bought peace the accused may not thereafter assert that the proceedings terminated in his favor.” Restatement (Second) of Torts §660 (a) Comment c.

Pennsylvania courts have adopted this position on Allianell v. Hoffman, 317 Pa. 148, 176 Atl. 207 (1935). In that case, the accused agreed to pay $20 in restitution in return for dismissal of theft charges. In dismissing the subsequent action for malicious prosecution the Supreme Court stated: “Where the termination of a criminal prosecution or civil action has been brought about by the procurement of defendant therein, or by compromise and settlement, an action for malicious prosecution cannot be maintained”. Allianell v. Hoffman (supra) at 149.

An examination of the Rules of the ARD program make it clear that the program provides the Commonwealth with a vehicle of disposing of relatively minor criminal prosecutions, and that a defendant agrees to forego his right to trial of the cause by agreeing to accept ARD. The program partakes of the nature of a compromise or settlement conditioned on defendant’s complying with the terms of probation, thus by accepting the ARD disposition of the criminal charges lodged against him, a defendant, such as plaintiff was in this case, has affected a compromise for settlement of the matter. As a matter of law, such a settlement is not a sufficiently favorable disposition as to satisfy the requirements of an action for malicious prosecutions.

*151For the reasons given herein, defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





C.W.
Gilluly, Chief Executive Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the “Company”) certifies
in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007 and that
to the best of his or her knowledge:





1.
            the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.




October 8,
      2008
            /s/ C.W. 
      Gilluly, Ed.D.C.W. Gilluly,
      Ed.D.Chief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1



|Contact: | Lorraine D. Miller, CFA            
|-------- | -----------------------------------
|         | Senior Vice President              
|         | Finance and External Communications
|         | 404.378.0491                       



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



WESTPOINT STEVENS FILES PLAN OF REORGANIZATION

WEST POINT, GEORGIA (January 21, 2005) -- WestPoint Stevens (OTCBB:  WSPTQ)

The Disclosure Statement and the Plan of Reorganization can be accessed on the Company's website at www.westpointstevens.com.

WestPoint Stevens Inc. is the nation's premier home fashions consumer products company, with a wide range of bed linens, towels, blankets, comforters and accessories marketed under the well-known brand names GRAND PATRICIAN, PATRICIAN, MARTEX, ATELIER MARTEX, BABY MARTEX, UTICA, STEVENS, LADY PEPPERELL, SEDUCTION, VELLUX and CHATHAM -- all registered trademarks owned by WestPoint Stevens Inc. and its subsidiaries -- and under licensed brands includingCHARISMA, RALPH LAUREN HOME, DISNEY HOMEandGLYNDA TURLEY.  WestPoint Stevens can be found on the World Wide Web at www.westpointstevens.com.

Safe Harbor Statement: Except for historical information contained herein, certain matters set forth in this press release are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties may be attributable to important factors that include but are not limited to the following: Product margins may vary from those projected; Raw material prices may vary from those assumed; Additional reserves may be required for bad debts, returns, allowances, governmental compliance costs, or litigation; There may be changes in the performance of financial markets or fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; Unanticipated natural disasters could have a material impact upon results of operations; There may be changes in the general economic conditions that affect customer practices or consumer spending; Competition for retail and wholesale customers, pricing and transportation of products may vary from time to time due to seasonal variations or otherwise; Customer preferences for our products can be affected by competition, or general market demand for domestic or imported goods or the quantity, quality, price or delivery time of such goods; There could be an unanticipated loss of a material customer or a material license; The availability and price of raw materials could be affected by weather, disease, energy costs or other factors; The future results of operations may be adversely affected by factors relating to the Chapter 11 proceedings. The information contained in this release is as of January 21, 2005.  WestPoint Stevens assumes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, contained in this document as a result of new information or future events or developments
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1132

ROSA DEL CARMEN AREVALO DE ARRIOLA,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: September 20, 2016 Decided: December 2, 2016

Before TRAXLER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnedo S. Valera, LAW OFFICES OF VALERA & ASSOCIATES, Fairfax, 

Virginia, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy

Assistant Attorney General, Paul Fiorino, Senior Litigation 

Counsel, Jenny C. Lee, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rosa del Carmen Arevalo de Arriola, a native and citizen of 

El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal from the 

immigration judge’s denial of her requests for withholding of 

removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We 

have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of 

Arevalo de Arriola’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. 

We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling 

contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence 

supports the Board’s decision. See Gomis v. Holder, 571 F.3d 353, 

359 (4th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons 

stated by the Board. In re Arevalo de Arriola (B.I.A. Jan. 11, 

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 99.2

Section 906 Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. 

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

       General Partner

/S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________

Name: Kelly Tucek

Title: Assistant Vice President of the General Partner and

         Principal Financial Officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.

Date: May 12, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

                    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Urban AG Corporation (“Urban AG”) because it has not filed a periodic report since it filed its Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2013, filed on                           ( print page 17808)                        November 19, 2013. Urban AG's common stock (ticker “AQUM”) is quoted on OTC Link (previously “Pink Sheets”) operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc.                

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of Urban AG.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of Urban AG is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 31, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 14, 2015.

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-07672 Filed 3-31-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE CODE 8011-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF

VYYO INC.



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vyyo Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Davidi
Gilo, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Arik Levi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
his knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|/s/    Davidi Gilo                                
|                                                  
|Davidi Gilo Chief Executive Officer April 29, 2004



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|                                                
|/s/    Arik Levi                                
|                                                
|Arik Levi Chief Financial Officer April 29, 2004



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Market  Integrity,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Daniel L. Hodges,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting  Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31****CERTIFICATION**     I, Ryan G. O’Desky, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Midway Games Inc.; and     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.         October 27, 2008         /s/ Ryan G. O’Desky   Ryan G. O’Desky   Interim Chief Financial Officer
Stratification of South Carolina

1995

Prepared by Geospatial Science and Survey Section, 2014

Land Use Strata

>50% Cultivated

15-50% Cultivated

Agri-Urban: >100 homes/sq. mi.

Commercial: >100 homes/sq. mi.

<15% Cultivated

Non-Agricultural

Water

Unprojected, Geographic Coordinates
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0037

IN TI-IE MATTER OF: 

# FILED JUN 1 5 2021 Bowen Greenwood Cerk of Suprerne Court State of Montane A.D., ORDER

A Youth in Need ofCare.

Counsel for the appellant mother of A.D. filed a motion and brief asking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counselhas been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The mother was granted time to file a response,butno response was filed. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in the mother's appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED thatthis appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellant mother per onally. DATED this 15 day ofJune,2021.
ChiefJustice 06/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0037

### dri Justices
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acrongenomics, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March  31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ron Lizée, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  May 16, 2005

By:

/s/ RON LIZÉE



Name: Ron Lizée

Title:   Chief Financial Officer
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.5

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

          KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Damien M. Sullivan, Bobby G. Jenkins and Barry
F. Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
PANAVISION INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form
10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the
undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to
the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in
connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this
30th of March, 2005.

                                        /S/ ED GREGORY HOOKSTRATTEN
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        ED GREGORY HOOKSTRATTEN
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3077 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3077

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on the estate tax valuation of certain real property used in farming or 
                      other trades or businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2021

 Ms. Cortez Masto introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
on the estate tax valuation of certain real property used in farming or 
                      other trades or businesses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving Family Farms Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON THE ESTATE TAX VALUATION OF CERTAIN 
              REAL PROPERTY USED IN FARMING OR OTHER TRADES OR 
              BUSINESSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2032A(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``$750,000'' and inserting 
``$11,700,000''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Section 2032A(a)(3) of such Code is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$750,000'' both places it appears and 
        inserting ``$11,700,000'',
            (2) by striking ``1998'' in the matter preceding 
        subparagraph (A) and inserting ``2021'', and
            (3) by striking ``1997'' in subparagraph (B) and inserting 
        ``2020''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to the estates of decedents dying after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
JOSEPH TOMLIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4101

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark J. Borello, Judge.

Joseph Tomlin, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.