alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Forgotten  Investments
Company,  Inc.,  on Form 10- QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  Daniel L.  Hodges,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-72,971-07

EX PARTE RODRICK LAVAUR GRIFFIN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. FR 60942-G IN THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BELL COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. Under Article

11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a district clerk is required to forward to this Court,

among other things, “the application, any answers filed, any motions filed, transcripts of all

depositions and hearings, any affidavits, and any other matters such as official records used by the

court in resolving issues of fact.” Id. at § 3(d); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). The record

forwarded to this Court appears, however, to be incomplete. The record is missing the State’s

supplemental answer, and an affidavit from Charley Valdez that is referred to in the trial court’s

supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law.
2

The district clerk shall either forward to this Court the State’s supplemental answer, and the

affidavit from Charley Valdez, or certify in writing that these documents are not part of the record. 

The district clerk shall comply with this order within thirty days from the date of this order.

Filed: January 18, 2023

Do not publish
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

C.W. Gilluly, Chief Executive Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the "Company")
certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB/A for year ended June 30, 2005 and
that to the best of his or her knowledge:

     1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.


January 19, 2007                        /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                        Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Xinhua  China  LTD.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Xianping Wang,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2008



                                        By: /s/ XIANPING WANG
                                            __________________________________
                                                Xianping Wang
                                                President (principal executive
                                                officer)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-95-00509-CV

David Vasquez, Appellant

v.

Alonso Camara d/b/a Alonso Camara Insurance Agency, Progressive County Mutual

Insurance Company, and Bank One, Texas, N.A., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 93-13518, HONORABLE MARY C. WILLIAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

David Vasquez filed his notice of appeal in the trial court on July 20, 1995. This

Court abated this appeal in 1996 after receiving notice that Vasquez had filed for bankruptcy. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1, 8.2. After the abatement, no party to this appeal sought reinstatement. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. We have now been informed that the bankruptcy case related to this appeal

is closed.

On November 17, 2016, this Court mailed notice to appellant that this appeal would

be dismissed for want of prosecution unless he filed a status report on or before November 28, 2016,

that provided reason to retain this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). To date, no response has

been filed. Accordingly, we reinstate this appeal and dismiss it for want of prosecution.
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: November 30, 2016

2
[In Bank

October 5, 1894.]

#### Ex Parte WILLIAM FREDERICKS on Habeas Corpus.

Criminal Law — Homicide—Conviction or Murder — Sentence or Death —Aiteal—Imprisonment in State Prison — Habeas Corpus. — A defendant convicted of murder in the first degree, and sentenced to be hanged in the state prison, is lawfully confined in the state prison pending an appeal from the judgment of conviction, and'from an order denying his motion for a new trial, and is not entitled to be released therefrom upon habeas corpus.

Id. — Stay or Execution — Change or Law — Imprisonment Pending Execution. — An appeal to the supreme court from a judgment of conviction only stays the execution of the death penalty pending the appeal in capital cases, and the execution of the judgment has not acquired *401any different meaning or effect by reason of the change of the law by which in capital cases the prisoner is confined in the state prison pending the execution of the sentence of death.

Id. — Certificate or Probable' Cause — Stay or Imprisonment. — An imprisonment, if part of the penalty, is not stayed without a certificate of probable cause for the appeal.

ApplicatioN in the Supreme Court for writ of *habeas corpus*against W. E. Hale, warden of state prison.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

*G. E. Goldwell,*for Petitioner.

*Attorney General W. H. H*Hart, *contra.*

Beatty, C. J.

This is a petition for a writ of *habeas corpus.*The petitioner, having been convicted of murder in the first degree, was, on the 7th of May, 1894, sentenced to be hanged at the San Quentin prison, and on the same day a warrant was delivered to the sheriff, in obedience to which he immediately delivered the petitioner to the warden of said prison, by whom he is still detained. On the 23d of May, 1894, the petitioner appealed to this court from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial. Afterwards, a certified copy of his notice of appeal was served on the warden, with a demand for the return of the prisoner to the custody of the sheriff, which was refused.

The imprisonment of the petitioner is not unlawful. It is true that, by section 1243 of the Penal Code, it is provided that an appeal to the supreme court from a judgment of conviction stays the execution of the judgment in all capital cases. But the intention of the legislature in adopting this provision was merely to prevent the infliction of the death penalty pending the appeal, and it has not acquired any different meaning or effect since, or by reason of the change of the law by which in capital cases the prisoner is confined in the state prison pending the execution of the sentence of» death.

*402Even if this imprisonment is to be regarded as a part ■of the penalty it stands upon the same grounds as •■other judgments of imprisonment. It is not stayed ■without a certificate of probable cause for the appeal, ¡and no such certificate has been granted in this case.

Writ denied.

Van Fleet, J., HarrisoN, J., Garoutte, J., and McFarland, J., concurred.
ACCEPTED

14-15-00268-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/24/2015 10:21:42 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/24/2015 10:21:42 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
PROJCS["NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_18N",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983",DATUM["D_North_American_1983",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",500000.0],PARAMETER["False_Northing",0.0],PARAMETER["Central_Meridian",-75.0],PARAMETER["Scale_Factor",0.9996],PARAMETER["Latitude_Of_Origin",0.0],UNIT["Meter",1.0]]
EX-4.1






 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 Exhibit 4.1 NUMBER MS COMMON STOCK Minerva Surgical, Inc. SHARES CUSIP 60343F 10 6 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF Minerva Surgical, Inc. transferable on the books of the Company in person or by duly
authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile signatures of the Company’s duly
authorized officers. Dated: SECRETARY PRESIDENT COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC (BROOKLYN, NY) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 













 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT– (Cust) Custodian (Minor) TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties JT TEN – as joint tenants with right under Uniform
Gifts to Minors of survivorship and not as tenants in common Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE Shares of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer
the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY
PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. Signature(s) Guaranteed By The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with
membership in an approved Signature Guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to SEC Rule 17ad-15.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Granted and Order filed January 24, 2014

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-14-00062-CV

IN RE CLIFFORD HALL

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2003-20180

O R D E R

This Court has reviewed the petition for writ of habeas corpus of relator, Clifford 

Hall.

The Court is of the opinion that relator’s petition requires further consideration. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(3). We therefore order the Clerk of this Court to issue a writ 

of habeas corpus, returnable on February 26, 2014, pending final determination of the 

relief requested in the petition. We further order that relator be discharged upon 

execution and filing of a bond as set forth below. See id. 

The relator will be admitted to bail upon his giving a good and sufficient bond, 

signed by relator as principal and his attorney, Tyesha Y. Elam, as surety, conditioned as 
required by law, or by any other surety acceptable to the Sheriff of Harris County, or cash 

in lieu of bond, in the sum of Five Hundred Dollars, pending the hearing on the return 

date of this writ, and until otherwise ordered by this Court. 

A response to the petition is hereby requested to be filed on or before February 3, 

2014. The cause is set for submission without oral argument on February 26, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Order filed January 24, 2014.

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Brown.
SOYBEAN ACREAGE

What is Included in NASS Estimates

Included in NASS Soybean Estimates

Planted Acres Harvested Acres

Planted and Expected to be Harvested for Beans Yes Yes

Planted and Expected to be Harvested for Seed Yes Yes

Planted to Other Crop that Failed, then Planted to Soybeans 

and Expected to be Harvested for Beans Yes Yes

Planted, Failed, Replanted to Soybeans and Expected to be 

Harvested for Beans Yes (Counted Once) Yes

Took Prevented Plant Claim for Any Crop, Planted Soybeans as 

Cover Crop for Hay Yes No

Planted, but Failed Yes No

Planted and Expected to be Harvested for Hay/Forage Yes No

Planted, Failed, then Planted to Other Crop Yes No

Intended to be Planted, Didn't Plant, Took Prevented Plant 

Claim No No

Intended to be Planted, Didn't Plant, and Didn't Take 

Prevented Plant Claim No No

Questions: Contact Lance Honig, Crops Branch Chief - Lance.Honig@usda.gov Updated: August 9, 2019

Scenario Description

To assist users who may have questions about what is included in NASS soybean acreage estimates, the 

table below documents whether or not acres are included for a number of scenarios. NASS procedures 

for inclusion and exclusion are unchanged from previous years.
**Exhibit 13.1**
**Section 302 Certification**
I, **John O’Donovan**, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 

 

 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 THAT WERE
FILED  WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         1
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6966

VINCENT D. YUILLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. D. ROBINSON, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center; E. S. WILLIS, Chairman c/o ICA, Nottoway Correctional Center; R. L. PARMENTER, Counselor, Nottoway Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-02-324-2) Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 9, 2002 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vincent D. Yuille, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Vincent D. Yuille appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Yuille v. Robinson , No. CA-02-324-2 (E.D. Va. June 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]




The Board of Directors
Big Foot Financial Corp.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-57981) on Form S-8 of Big Foot Financial Corp. of our report dated July 27,
2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Big Foot Financial Corp.
and subsidiary as of June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statement of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2001, which report is incorporated
by reference in the June 30, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Big Foot
Financial Corp.

                                            /s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
September 24, 2001