alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Francis C. Heil

Senior Attorney

Legal

1101 17th St NW

Suite 600

Washington DC 20036

202-496-5642 Office

francis.heil@aa.com

October 23, 2013

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: American Airlines, Application for Exemption (DFW – Shanghai),

 DOT-OST-2013-0187

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

American Airlines has completed its poll of the carriers served with the captioned application we 

filed on October 17, 2013, and there are no objections. Accordingly, we request approval on an 

expedited basis.

Respectfully submitted,

Francis C. Heil

cc: Docket Branch

Service list
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the following 

persons:

howard.kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com

dan.weiss@untited.com

karine.faden@united.com

____________________

FRANCIS C. HEIL

October 23, 2013
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-30975 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DAVID TURNER, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-156-J

- - - - - - - - - - August 22, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * David Turner appeals the sentence following his guilty-plea conviction to conspiracy to import marihuana and importation of marihuana. Turner contends that the district court erred by denying him a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility and by declining to consider him a minimal or minor participant. Because Turner attempted to minimize his participation in the offenses of conviction, the district courtNo. 95-30975 - 2 - did not clearly err by denying him a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. See United States v. Wilder , 15 F.3d 1292, 1299 (5th Cir. 1994). Because the offense conduct demonstrates that Turner was more culpable than he indicated, the district court did not clearly err by declining to award him a downward adjustment for being a minor or minimal participant.
See United States v. Zuniga , 18 F.3d 1254, 1261 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 214 (1994).
AFFIRMED.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact:      Carol DiRaimo, Vice President of Investor Relations
              (913) 967-4109

           Applebee's International Reports February Comparable Sales

OVERLAND  PARK,  KAN.,  February  28,  2007 --  Applebee's  International,  Inc.
(Nasdaq:APPB)  today reported  comparable  sales for the four-week  period ended
February 25, 2007.

System-wide  domestic  comparable  sales  decreased 4.0 percent for the February
period,  and comparable sales for domestic franchise  restaurants  decreased 3.9
percent.  Comparable  sales  for  company  restaurants  decreased  4.3  percent,
reflecting a decrease in guest traffic of between 5.5 and 6.0 percent,  combined
with a higher average check.  The negative  impact of more severe winter weather
this  year  on  February  system-wide   comparable  sales  is  estimated  to  be
approximately  1.5  to  2.0  percent,   with  company  restaurants  affected  by
approximately  0.5  to  1.0  percent  and  franchise   restaurants  affected  by
approximately 2.0 to 2.5 percent.

System-wide  domestic  comparable sales for the  quarter-to-date  period through
February  (eight weeks) have  decreased  4.9 percent,  with company and domestic
franchise  restaurant  comparable  sales  down  5.4  percent  and  4.7  percent,
respectively.

Applebee's International,  Inc., headquartered in Overland Park, Kan., develops,
franchises and operates  restaurants under the Applebee's  Neighborhood  Grill &
Bar brand,  the largest casual dining  concept in the world.  As of February 25,
2007,  there were  1,942  Applebee's  restaurants  operating  system-wide  in 49
states,  16  international  countries,   and  one  U.S.  territory.   Additional
information on Applebee's  International  can be found at the company's  website
(www.applebees.com).

                                      # # #
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6118

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS NEGRON LEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-236, CA-97-206-3-P)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 1, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Negron Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Lee, Nos. CR-93-236; CA-97-206-3-P

(W.D.N.C. Nov. 10, 1997). We deny Appellant’s motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, motion for appointment of

counsel, and motion to stay the mandate. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit32



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Montana Mining Corp. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ruairidh Campbell, do hereby certify,
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
 knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the small business issuer
 for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
 November 12, 2008

/s/
 Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh
 Campbell

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small
 business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
 amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement
 required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer
 and will be retained by the small business issuer
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



23
# C_2016259EN.01000101.xml

| 16.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 259/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7944 — Credit Mutuel/GE Capital’s factoring and equipment financing businesses in France and Germany)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 259/01)

On 14 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7944. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7944. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Manufacturer Manufacturer Owned Distributor Independent

Distributor Contractor/Dealer

Subject to civil penalties based upon committing a prohibited act Yes Yes No No

Can be labeled a routine violator No No Yes Yes

Considered a manufacturer under definition Yes Yes No No

Can remediate to get off routine violator list N/A N/A Yes Yes

Right to appeal finding of Routine Violation N/A N/A Yes Yes

Record retention 60 months 60 months 54 months 48 months Record retention start date 30 days after Final

Rule 30 days after Final

Rule Nov. 30, 2015 30 days after Final Rule
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 65 (Monday, April 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07738]



[[Page 18407]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Dental and 
Craniofacial Research.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research, including consideration of 
personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of 
individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.
    Date: May 28-29, 2015.
    Time: May 28, 2015, 12:00 p.m. to 5:40 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 30, Room 117, NIH 
Campus, Bethesda, MD 20892.

    Time: May 29, 2015, 8:00 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 30, Room 117, NIH 
Campus, Bethesda, MD 20892
    Contact Person: Alicia J. Dombroski, Ph.D., Director, Division 
of Extramural Activities, Natl Inst of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
594-4805.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/about/CouncilCommittees.asp, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 31, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-07738 Filed 4-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Unaudited Financial Statements of Online Innovation, Inc. for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         195,037
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,395
<PP&E>                                         105,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,839)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 744,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,573,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (973,159)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   744,001
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (177,321)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (177,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (166,821)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (166,821)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 10868 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Briant Lane,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 106

- 1

Before **Davis, Jones,** and **Elrod,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Briant Lane has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lane has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 18, 2022
Lyle W. Cayc e Clerk Case: 21-10868 Document: 00516282755 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2022No. 21

- 10868

2 brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
**GRANTED** , c ounsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-10868 Document: 00516282755 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2022
#### David D. Macmurphy, clerk, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Miles G. Dobbins, defendant in error.

Clerks of the superior court are not entitled to more than $0 00 *costs*in each civil case prosecuted to judgment, including the recording of the proceedings had therein.

Costs. Before Judge Pottle. Richmond Superior Court. October Term, 1873.

For the facts, see the decision.

Frank H. Miller, for plaintiff in errror.

Amos T. Akerman, by D. P. Hill, for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The only question presented by the record in this case for our judgment is, whether the clerk of the superior courtis entitled to charge for his costs in civil cases more than $6 00 in every suit commenced and prosecuted to judgment, including service in recording petition, process and judgment, as specified in the 3695th Section of the Code. It is insisted that the clerk is entitled to charge fifteen cents per hundred words for recording proceedings in civil cases, and that includes the recording of the petition, process and judgment in all civil cases. The reply is,' that the clerk’s fees in every suit commenced and prosecuted to judgment, including service for recording the petition, process and judgment, is definitely fixed and prescribed by the law, and that is true in regard to the clerk’s fees in every case, in which his fees are definitely fixed and prescribed, but in other civil cases, in which his fees are not definitely fixed and prescribed, he is entitled to charge for recording the proceedings in such cases, fifteen cents per one hundred words. In regulating the clerk’s fees in suits commenced and prosecuted to judgment, including his service in recording the petition, process and judgment, the .legislature doubtless intended to provide a fair average compensation for *295the service to be rendered, taking into consideration that some cases would be short, and some longer than others. The clerk gets his $6 00 in the short cases, and he is entitled to no more in the longer ones. When the clerk accepted the office, he undertook to perform the duties of it, and render the services incident thereto, for the fees prescribed by law for such services.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10981 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

KELLY M. STAPLETON

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10

- CR

- 157

- 1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kelly M. Stapleton

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Stapleton h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 30, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-10981 Document: 00515471464 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2020No. 19

- 10981

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further re sponsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-10981 Document: 00515471464 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2020
# C_2016236EN.01000201.xml

| 30.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8041 — M&G/Anchorage/PHS Group Investment)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 236/03)

On 23 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8041. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8041. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.
333-32201, 333-32203, 333-40065, 333-20907, 333-20905, 333-63895, and 333-72237
on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-72643 and 333-50249 on Forms
S-3 of our reports dated February 10, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, and related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedules for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which appears in the December
31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc.


                                                     KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
March 25, 1999