alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# National Guard Museum opens OIF/OEF exhibit

/ Published Dec. 13, 2006

WASHINGTON - A new interactive exhibit that showcases the National Guard’s participation in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom went on display Dec. 6, a week before the National Guard observed its 370th birthday.

More than 100 visitors viewed the National Guard Museum’s OEF/OIF exhibit which displays Guard members’ equipment, uniforms and photographs from the ongoing operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Officials at the National Guard Association of the United States, where the museum and exhibit are located, hope the exhibit will further the story of the National Guard and its service to the states and nation by catering to the tourists who visit Washington each year.

The NGAUS museum and library already offer a large collection of Guard artifacts and reference materials for visitors. The items are managed and funded by the National Guard Educational Foundation (NGEF) through the Guard association.

“As a museum, we tell the story of the Guard from 1636 to now,” said Jason Hall, director of the NGEF. “Until today, we were lacking a major part of that history: Guardsman in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

But the best part of the opening, Hall said, was to watch the veterans appreciating it. “It’s for them,” he said.

Four Army Guard Soldiers and one Air Guard member donated the items on display. They include a flight suit, flight gloves, G-suit, a flight tunic, a battle dress uniform and boots, and an interactive collection of photographs from Guard units around the country.

“I think it’s very important that we offer a bigger story because the National Guard has such a large role in OEF/OIF,” said Maj. Kenneth Stice who attended the opening with his wife.

Stice’s uniform and boots are displayed in a glass case along with a photo from Iraq where he served with the Arizona Army Guard’s 2220th Transportation Company during its deployment from 2003 to 2004.

“I was proud that they accepted my uniform. It’s a beautiful display,” Stice said. “It gives a better understanding of what we’ve done.”

----

The granite and glass NGAUS Memorial Building is located on the corner of Massachusetts Avenue and Capitol Street within sight of the Capitol. Visiting hours are Monday – Friday, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. or by appointment. People can contact Jason Hall at jhall@ngaus.org or 1-888-22NGAUS for special group tours.
SNAPSHOT

Northern Mariana

Islands Farmers, 2018

(percent)

Sex

Male 80

Female 20

Age

<45 18

45 - 64 60

65+ 22

Lived on their farm 62

Years on farm

<10 44

10+ 56

Primary occupation

Farming 68

Other 32

Race

Chamarro 60

Chinese 6

Filipino 14

White 2

Other 18

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Agriculture

ACH17-17/August 2020

Results from the 2018 Census of Agriculture

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

Farms and Land

In 2018, the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands had 253 

farms, virtually unchanged from 2007. 

These farms accounted for 1,515 acres 

of farmland, or 1% of all land in the 

Northern Mariana Islands. This was a 

decline of 2,498 acres (62%) from the 

2007 level. 

During the same time, the average farm 

size decreased 62%, from 15.7 acres in 

2007 to 6.0 acres in 2018.

The smallest farm category (less than 

1 acre) experienced the largest change 

in number of farms by size, more than 

doubling. Farms with less than 2 acres 

increased 38%. Farms with more than 

40 acres decreased by 71%.

Since the last Census of Agriculture in 2007 in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

Islands, the amount of land in farms and value of agricultural products sold decreased while 

the number of farms remained virtually unchanged. The number of small farms increased 

while the number of larger farms decreased.

What is a “farm”? The Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands Census of Agriculture 

defines a farm as any place from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products were 

produced and sold, or normally would have been sold, during the census year.

253

farms

1,515

acres

6.0 acres

average farm size 

Farm Counts by Size 

2007 2018

< 2 acres 74 102

2-4 acres 58 61

5-9 acres 49 50

10-19 acres 38 18

20-40 acres 13 15

> 40 acres 24 7

Farms and Farmland, 2007 and 2018

2007 2018 % change

Number of farms 256 253 -1

Land in farms (acres) 4,013 1,515 -62

Average farm size (acres) 15.7 6.0 -62

Commodity Group by Value of Sales (dollars)

2007 2018

Vegetables and melons 631,470 638,609

Poultry and poultry products 214,360 214,201

Nursery crops 178,311 186,390

Livestock and livestock products 279,485 134,175

Fruit and nuts 401,664 (D)

Root crops 638,498 (D)

Fish and other aquaculture 65,725 (D)

Total 2,409,513 1,580,081

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.

58%

The percentage of farms with 

internet access. Mobile broadband 

was the most common mode (76%).

For more information about the Census of 

Agriculture, visit www.nass.usda.gov/AgCensus.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Top Commodities by Number of Farms, 2018

No. of Farms

Bananas 118

Chickens, layers > 4 mos. 115

Coconuts 84

Mangoes 81

Lemons and limes 77

Papayas 74

Highlights
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our reports dated September 8, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in theForm 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of SPACEHAB, Incorporated on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-36779, effective November 3, 1997,File No. 333-43159, effective December 24, 1997, and File No. 333-43181, effective December 24, 1997) and Form S-4 (File No. No. 333-126772, effective September 6, 2005). 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Houston, Texas 

October 4, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, J. Todd Hagely, hereby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of Direct General Corporation on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Direct General Corporation.

    March 15, 2006     By: /s/ J. Todd Hagely
        Date              -----------------------------------
                                      (Signature)

                       Name:  J. Todd Hagely
                       Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3086 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3086

To require the Energy Information Administration to submit to Congress 
and make publicly available an annual report on Federal agency policies 
    and regulations and Executive orders that have increased or may 
  increase energy prices in the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 27, 2021

   Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself, Mr. Marshall, Ms. Lummis, Mrs. 
  Capito, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Moran, and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Energy Information Administration to submit to Congress 
and make publicly available an annual report on Federal agency policies 
    and regulations and Executive orders that have increased or may 
  increase energy prices in the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Give Americans Stability at Pumps as 
Rising Inflation Causes Emergencies Act'' or the ``GAS PRICE Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON POLICIES, REGULATIONS, AND EXECUTIVE ORDERS AFFECTING 
              ENERGY PRICES.

    Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and 
every year thereafter, the Energy Information Administration shall 
submit to Congress and make publicly available a report detailing each 
Federal agency policy or regulation and each Executive order with an 
effective date of January 20, 2021, or later that the Energy 
Information Administration determines has increased or may increase 
energy prices in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### LAVINA WILLIAMS et al., Complainants, *Appellees, vs.*WILLIAM FIELD, *Defendant, Appellant.*

APPEAL, IÍÍ EQUITY FROM LAFAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT.

A decree which disposes of the 'matters in controversy between tho parties, but which reserves the question of costs for further adjudication, is interlocutory, and not final.

An appeal from such a decree must be taken within fifteen days.

This was a bill for specific performance, to compel the defendant to convey to the complainants two certain mineral lots therein described, and for an account of the rents and profits thereof. The case was brought to a bearing at the March term of the Circuit Court of Lafayette county, 1852, and was argued by counsel. Whereupon the court made a decree in favor.of the said complainants, that the defendant, within six months from the filing of the decree, should execute and deliver to the complainants a deed of quitclaim or release of the property which the defendant had in the said mineral lots, with a covenant of warranty against his own acts, &c. And in case the defendant should fail to deliver the deed within the time prescribed, then such right and title to pass by the power and effect of the decree. And further, that the defendant account for the rents and profits of the said lots, and further ordering a reference to a commissioner for that purpose. And further ordering the said commissioner to ascertain the true and correct boundaries of said lots, and each of them, by abuttals, metes and bounds, or courses and distances, *422and to make a survey for tliat purpose. And that lie make a report, with all convenient speed, to tke court, reserving “the consideration of all further orders, matters and directions, and of the costs and charges in this suit incurred, paid, laid out and expended, until the coming in of the report upon the matters herein "before referred:’

The decree bore date December 31,1852. From this decree an appeal was taken to this court more than fifteen days, but less than two months after the date thereof. A motion was made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the decree was interlocutory and not final, and hence the appeal was not taken within the time prescribed by the statute.

*Jas. H.*Knoiolton, for the motion.

*A. L. Collins1*contra.

*By the Court,*

Winxoif, O. J.

The decree in this case disposes of the matters in controversy between the parties, and should be regarded as a final decree, were it not that the question of costs is reserved by the court for further adjudication. "When this is done, the Court of Chancery, of the State of New York, has held that the decree is interlocutory, although it is in all other respects final in its nature. *Dickinson and Wife vs. Codwise,*11 *Paige R.*191; *Williamson vs. Field,*2 *Barb. Ch. R.*281. We are disposed to follow those decisions, as they were made under a statute regulating appeals in chancery similar to ours. It follows, that as this appeal was not taken within the time fixed by the statue for appealing from an interlocutory decree, it must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
SERVED: AUGUST 22, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF ::? SKYWEST A.JRLINES FAADOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0874
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 7']J7 ,,t '- 

## 23

This proceeding(heretofore designated as Case No. 2011NM060038) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

onnie 

### A Yod ChiefAdministrative Attachment

- Service List ·

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1

Todd C. Emerson, 

### Respondent's Counsel Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines · 444 South River Road St. George, UT84 790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 

### ONE COPY

Jeffrey M. Harper, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM.:.7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, ·wA 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0874 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Corey RinkerCorey RinkerChief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Covance Inc. ("Covance") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph L. Herring, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Covance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
March 1, 2006

/s/ Joseph L. HerringJoseph L. Herring
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We  consent  to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on 
Form S-8  pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan of 
Standard Management  Corporation  of our report dated March 12, 1997,  with 
respect  to the consolidated  financial  statements  of  Standard Management 
International S.A. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A  No. 2 for 
the year ended December 31,  1996 of Standard Management Corporation, filed 
with  the  Securities  and Exchange Commission.



                                                KPMG AUDIT

Luxembourg
November 26, 1997
# Maj. Gen. John Gronski visits Battle Group Poland

/ Published Nov. 2, 2018

BEMOWO PISKIE, Poland — U.S. Army Maj. Gen. John Gronski, the U.S. Army Europe, deputy commanding general for the Army National Guard, visited Soldiers from the Tennessee Army National Guard's 2nd Squadron, 278th Armored Cavalry Regiment, assigned to Battle Group Poland (BGPOL) at Bemowo Piskie Training Area, Poland, Oct. 30.

 During Gronski's visit to BGPOL, he met with U.S. Army Lt. Col. Donny Hebel, Battle Group Poland's commander and U.S. Command Sgt. Maj. Charles Haynes, Battle Group Poland's senior enlisted officer, to discuss combat readiness, assess the quality of life for Soldiers assigned here, and to inspect the updated motor pool maintenance tents.

 In addition to discussing business, Gronski also took the time to meet with Soldiers in their areas of operation, and even award a few of them challenge coins as recognition for achievement.

 "I hope you realize how important it is that you are here on this mission," said Gronski to a squad of dismount infantry Soldiers. "This is a critical mission for our national security, and your sacrifice makes that possible."

 The 278this the largest major command (MACOM) in Tennessee, and one of only five armored brigade combat teams in the National Guard.

 "The National Guard have very specific advantages when units conduct deployments overseas," said Gronski about the Soldiers he met with during his visit. "National Guardsmen bring a lot of civilian skills to every mission. I spoke with many Soldiers today, and asked them what their jobs are; they told me answers from project managers, plumbers, masons, school teachers. They have all of these civilian skills along with their military skills that only enhance a mission. Sometimes Soldiers are called to do tasks outside of their military profession and these Soldiers are able to answer that call from their own expertise."

 BGPOL is a unique, multinational coalition of U.S., U.K., Croatian and Romanian Soldiers who serve with the Polish 15th Mechanized Brigade as a deterrent in support of NATO's Enhanced Forward Presence. 2nd Squadron, 278th ACR is the first National Guard unit deployed as part of the coalition to support BGPOL.

 "The skills our National Guardsmen possess enhance every mission they are assigned to," said Gronski. "That's not to say we are better than our active-duty counterparts, but these Soldiers bring special skills and assets you just can't find anywhere else. That's why we are here."
www.iata.org

International Air Transport Association

1201 F St., NW, Suite 650

Washington, DC 20004 USA

Tel: +1 202 628 9292

Fax: +1 202 628 9448

BEFORE THE

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the matter of:

Motion of Airlines for America (A4A)

And Regional Airline Association for 

a Temporary Exemption from 

14 C.F.R. § 259.4

Comments of the International Air Transport Association

The International Air Transport Association (IATA), on behalf of its approximately 

240 airline members around the world, appreciates the opportunity to support 

the motion made by Airlines for America (A4A) and the Regional Airline 

Association (RAA) requesting a moratorium on the Department’s so-called 

“tarmac delay rule” in light of the impacts of FAA furloughs on air traffic efficiency 

in the United States. IATA’s members represent 84% of the world’s air traffic, 

including the majority of US and foreign carriers that fly into and out of the United

States. As such, we have a significant interest in the Department’s decision in

this matter.

IATA believes the Department must grant a moratorium of the tarmac delay rule 

in light of the significant increase in delays resulting from the FAA’s furloughs.

Even before the recent furloughs, the majority of flight delays were caused by 

factors outside the control of airlines. To continue to punish airlines for delays 

that the FAA has stated repeatedly are caused directly by government action 

would defy logic, fairness and sound economics. DOT fines are designed to 

incentivize airlines to take certain actions it deems in the public interest. In this 

case, it is government action, not airline action that is the issue. As such, fines or 

restrictions on airline action are not appropriate.

IATA believes the impact of furloughs on delays merely illuminates the 

foundational flaw of the tarmac delay rule. While the minimal number of lengthy 

delays has been reduced under the rule, the underlying causes of delays have 

Docket No.:

DOT-OST-2013-0084
2

not been addressed by the US Government. Furthermore, the dramatic increase

in cancellations has caused far more harm to passengers who would otherwise 

reach their destinations in a delayed but timely manner. We urge the Department 

to not only approve the moratorium but to also reassess the basis for the tarmac 

delay rule as a whole.

Sincerely,

Douglas E. Lavin

Regional Vice President, North America

International Air Transport Association

1201 F St., NW

Suite 650

Washington, D.C. 20004

Tel: (202) 628-9292

Fax: (202) 628-9448

Email: lavind@iata.org
Docket Number FAA-2013-0674
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14
PROMULGATED UNDER
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ William P. MoffittWilliam P. MoffittPresident and Chief Executive Officer