Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices 18373 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_

info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 

1See Certain Lined Paper Products From India: 

Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 40709 

(July 14, 2014) (Preliminary Results), and the 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China; 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the 

People’s Republic of China; and Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 

(September 28, 2006) (CLPP Order). 

3See Preliminary Results, 79 FR 40709. 

4 Id. 

5Petitioners are the Association of American 

School Paper Suppliers (AASPS) and its individual 

members, which consists of the following 

companies: ACCO Brands USA LLC, Norcom Inc., 

and Top Flight, Inc. See Petitioners’ letter dated 

June 5, 2014. 

6See Petitioners’ August 11, 2014 comments 

(Post-Preliminary Comments). 

7See Kokuyo’s August 29, 2014 rebuttal 

comments (Post-Preliminary Rebuttal). 

8See Petitioners’ September 5, 2014 Case Brief. 

9See Kokuyo’s September 18, 2014 Rebuttal Brief. 

10For a complete description of the scope of the 

CLPP Order, see the memorandum from Gary 

Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Issue and Decision 

Memorandum for Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India’’ (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum), dated concurrently with these final 

results. 

Department intends to reject factual 

submissions if the submitting party does 

not comply with the applicable revised 

certification requirements. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under APO 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate 

in these investigations should ensure 

that they meet the requirements of these 

procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of 

appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 

351.103(d)). 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to sections 702 and 777(i) of 

the Act. 

Dated: March 30, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

Scope of the Investigations 

The merchandise covered by these 

investigations is polyethylene terephthalate 

(PET) resin having an intrinsic viscosity of at 

least 0.70, but not more than 0.88, deciliters 

per gram. The scope includes blends of virgin 

PET resin and recycled PET resin containing 

predominantly virgin PET resin content, 

provided such blends meet the intrinsic 

viscosity requirements above. The scope 

includes all PET resin meeting the above 

specifications regardless of additives 

introduced in the manufacturing process. 

Although the merchandise covered by 

these investigations is not defined by its end 

use, it is typically used in the production of 

plastic bottles, in packaging for beverage, 

food, and manufactured products, in 

containers for household and automotive 

products, and in industrial strapping, among 

other applications. 

The merchandise subject to these 

investigations is properly classified under 

subheading 3907.60.00.30 of the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading 

is provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise under investigation is 

dispositive. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07835 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–843] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Notice of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 14, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the Preliminary 

Results of a changed circumstances 

review (CCR) of the antidumping duty 

order on certain lined paper products 

from India.1 The Department 

preliminarily determined that Kokuyo 

Riddhi Paper Products Private Limited 

(Kokuyo) is the successor-in-interest to 

Riddhi Enterprises (Riddhi). We 

received comments from interested 

parties on the Preliminary Results. 

Based on our analysis of these 

comments, for the final results, the 

Department continues to find that 

Kokuyo is the successor-in-interest to 

Riddhi. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 6, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cindy Robinson or Eric B. Greynolds, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3797 and (202) 482–6071, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 28, 2006, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register the antidumping duty order on 

certain lined paper from India.2

On May 14, 2014, Kokuyo requested 

that the Department conduct a CCR to 

determine whether it is the successorin-interest to Riddhi, for purposes of 

determining antidumping duties due as 

a result of the CLPP Order. On July 14, 

2014, the Department published its 

Preliminary Results, in which it 

determined that Kokuyo is the 

successor-in-interest to Riddhi.3 The 

Department invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results.4

On August 11, 2014, Petitioners 5

submitted their post-preliminary 

comments.6 On August 29, 2014, 

Kokuyo submitted its rebuttal 

comments.7 On September 5, 2014, 

Petitioners submitted a case brief.8 On 

September 18, 2014, Kokuyo submitted 

a rebuttal brief.9

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the CLPP 

Order is certain lined paper products, 

typically school supplies (for purposes 

of this scope definition, the actual use 

of or labeling these products as school 

supplies or non-school supplies is not a 

defining characteristic) composed of or 

including paper that incorporates 

straight horizontal and/or vertical lines 

on ten or more paper sheets (there shall 

be no minimum page requirement for 

looseleaf filler paper). The products are 

currently classified under the following 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 

4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 

4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 

4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 

4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 

4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 

4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

product description remains 

dispositive.10

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the postpreliminary and rebuttal comments, or 

in case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 


tkelley on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18374 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices 

11On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

12See Certain Lined Paper Products From India: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2010–2011, 78 FR 22232 (April 15, 2013). 

this changed circumstances review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, which is hereby adopted 

by this notice. A list of the issues which 

parties have raised, and to which we 

have responded in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, is attached to 

this notice as an Appendix. 

The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System 

(‘‘ACCESS’’).11 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and is available to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://

enforcement.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed and electronic version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum are 

identical in content. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

For the Preliminary Results, the 

Department found that Kokuyo was the 

successor-in-interest to Riddhi based on 

evidence on the record. For these final 

results, the Department continues to 

find that the business transfer from 

Riddhi to Kokuyo resulted in no 

significant changes to management, 

production facilities, supplier 

relationships, and customers with 

respect to the production and sale of the 

subject merchandise. Thus, we 

determine that Kokuyo operates as 

essentially the same business entity as 

Riddhi with respect to the subject 

merchandise. 

Accordingly, the Department 

determines that Kokuyo is the 

successor-in-interest to Riddhi for the 

purpose of determining antidumping 

duty liability. 

Instructions to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection 

As a result of this determination, we 

find that Kokuyo should receive the 

cash deposit rate previously assigned to 

Riddhi in the most recently completed 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain lined paper products from 

India. Consequently, the Department 

will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection to collect estimated 

antidumping duties for all shipments of 

subject merchandise exported by 

Kokuyo and entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date of this notice in the 

Federal Register at the current cash 

deposit rate for Riddhi, which is de 

minimis.12 This cash deposit 

requirement shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.216(e). 

Dated: March 30, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of Interested Party Comments 

Comment 1: Time Periods Analyzed When 

Conducting a Successor-in-Interest CCR 

Analysis 

Comment 2: Whether Kokuyo’s Management 

Structure Is Similar to That of Riddhi 

Comment 3: Whether Kokuyo’s Production 

Facilities Are Similar to Those of Riddhi 

Comment 4: Whether Kokuyo’s Customer 

Base Is the Same as Riddhi’s 

Comment 5: Whether Kokuyo’s Supplier Base 

Is the Same as Riddhi’s 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–07826 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Census Bureau 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35). 

Agency: U.S. Census Bureau. 

Title: American Community Survey 

(ACS) Methods Panel Envelope 

Mandatory Messaging Test. 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0936. 

Form Number(s): ACS–1, ACS–1 

(Spanish), ACS CATI, ACS CAPI, ACS 

Internet. 

Type of Request: Emergency review. 

Number of Respondents: 24,000. 

Average Hours Per Response: 40 

minutes. 

Burden Hours: 16,000. 

Needs and Uses: 

The American Community Survey 

collects detailed socioeconomic data 

from about 3.5 million households in 

the United States and 36,000 in Puerto 

Rico each year. The ACS also collects 

detailed socioeconomic data from about 

195,000 residents living in Group 

Quarter (GQ) facilities. An ongoing data 

collection effort with an annual sample 

of this magnitude requires that the ACS 

continue research, testing and 

evaluations aimed at improving data 

quality, achieving survey cost 

efficiencies, and improving ACS 

questionnaire content and related data 

collection materials. The ACS Methods 

Panel is a research program that is 

designed to address and respond to 

issues and survey needs. One of those 

issues relates to respondent concerns 

about the tone of the mandatory 

message on the ACS mail materials. 

The outside of the envelopes that 

contain the instructions to respond 

online and the paper ACS questionnaire 

display the bold message, ‘‘YOUR 

RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW.’’ 

The prominent references to the 

mandatory participation in the ACS are 

concerning to many respondents. The 

Census Bureau developed the current 

presentation of the mandatory nature of 

participation based on previous research 

that identified a significant positive 

impact of these messages in encouraging 

high self-response rates and reducing 

the need for follow-up by phone or 

personal visits by Census Bureau 

interviewers. In order to be responsive 

to respondent concern with the 

prominence of the mandatory message 

on the envelopes, we are conducting the 

Envelope Mandatory Messaging Test. 

This test will measure the impact of 

removing the phrase ‘‘YOUR 

RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW’’ 

from the envelopes (Attachment C) used 

to mail the initial package (second 

mailing) as well as the replacement 

package (fourth mailing). This phrase 


tkelley on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES