alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.31


 


Execution Copy


 


[Note: Translation from the original written
in Chinese]


 


Declaration and Undertaking


 


To :


 


eLongNet Information Technology (Beijing)
Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”)


No. 10 Middle Jiuxianqiao Road, Chaoyang District,
Beijing    


 


eLong, Inc.


4th Floor, Hutchence David Century
Garden, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands


 


This Declaration and Undertaking has
been duly executed and represents the genuine intent of each of the two persons which are signatories hereto.


 


Zhen Xie (“Party A”)


Residence: No. 68, Court 600, Yingkou
Street, Yangpu District, Shanghai


ID No.:


 


Haiyan Shen (Spouse) (“Party
B”)


Residence: No. 68, Court 600, Yingkou
Street, Yangpu District, Shanghai


ID Number:


 


Whereas:


Party A is a shareholder of Beijing eLong
Information Technology Co., Ltd., holding a 12.5% shareholding, and Party B is the lawful spouse of Party A.


 


Now, Party A and Party B both, in accordance
with PRC law and regulations, confirm and covenant to eLong, Inc. and WFOE as follows:


 


1.    Party A and Party B both understand
that the shareholding held by Party A is not the actual property of Party A, not part of Party A’s assets, and not joint
marital property of Party A and Party B under PRC law. Neither Party A nor Party B has any right to assert any rights, benefits,
preferences or claims related to the shareholding.


 


2.    Party A and B both covenant that
all rights and benefits related to the shareholding (including but not limited to inheritance, transfer, voting, mortgage, disposal,
benefits, etc.) are not part of the inheritable property of either party; Party A and Party B and any party inheriting under PRC
law do not have any right of inheritance to the shareholding.


 


3.    Party A and Party B both represent
and warrant, that no other family member or relative has any rights, benefits or preferences related to the shareholding, there
is no factual basis for any such claims or assertions, and no family member or relative shall make any claims or assertions relating
to the shareholding in the future.


 


This Declaration and Undertaking is
the genuine expression of the intent of Party A and Party B, has been voluntarily issued in accordance with applicable law, and
is binding and enforceable on Party A and Party B, who shall bear all legal liability to eLong, Inc. and WFOE for the effectiveness
and enforceability of this Declaration and Undertaking.


 


This Declaration and Undertaking is
irrevocable and permanent.


 


[remainder of page intentionally left blank]


 




    	- 1 -



    	 



    

 


[signature page of Declaration and Undertaking]


 


	Party A: Zhen Xie	 
	/s/ Zhen Xie	 
	Date:  12/28/2012	 
	 	 
	Party B: Haiyan Shen	 
	/s/ Haiyan Shen	 
	Date:  12/28/2012	 


 




    	- 2 -
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BLUSGUIN OTONIEL ALVARENGAMELGAR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73687

Agency No. A088-423-377

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 24, 2011** 

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Blusguin Otoniel Alvarenga-Melgar, a native and citizen of Honduras,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

JUN 01 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73687

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and de novo

constitutional claims. Lin v. Ashcroft, 377 F.3d 1014, 1023 (9th Cir. 2004). We

deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen on

the ground that Alvarenga-Melgar failed to demonstrate prima facie eligibility for

asylum where he failed to identify a source of persecution or demonstrate a wellfounded fear. See Mendez-Gutierrez v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1168, 1171 (9th Cir.

2006) (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie

case for the underlying relief sought); see also Khourassany v. INS, 208 F.3d 1096,

1101 (9th Cir. 2000) (holding similarly situated, unharmed family members

undermine future fear when an alien claims fear based on family group). It follows

that Alvarenga-Melgar has not established a violation of due process. See Lata v.

INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prejudice for a due

process violation).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson StateOffice Building P.O. Box 2063
Secretary Mr. Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator Harrisburg,PA 17105-2063 April 26, 2010

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 DearMr. Garvin: 717-787-2814

I am pleased to submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision addressing compliance with Section 110(a)(2) ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2006 24-hourNational Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate (PM2.s) and for Section 110(a)(2)(G) for the 1997 NAAQS for PM2 .5. Section 110(a)(I)ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(1), provides that states must adopt and submit SIP revisions to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) within three years after the promulgation ofa new orrevisedNAAQS. The "infrastructure" SIP revision addressing the implementation, maintenance, and enforcementof the 2006 24-hour PM2.5NAAQS was due to your agency on September 21, 2009. Enclosed are two hard copies and a compact clisk containing the PM2 .5Infrastructure SIP submittal, which includes a certification for the Department ofEnvironmental Protection's (DEP) public participation activities. The public participation process for this SIP revision included a 30-day written comment period and an opportunity for a public hearing. (See 39 Pa. B. 7924, December 26, 2009). The DEP did not receive any comments during the public comment period, which closed on January 29,2010. Thank you in advance for the expeditious consideration ofthis SIP submittal. Please contact Joyce E. Epps, Director, Bureau ofAir Quality, bye-mail atjeepps@state.pa.us orby telephone at 717-787-9702, ifyou have questions or need additional information.

Enclosures

An Equal Opportunity Employer Sincerely,

# dj(~

# \ John Hanger Secretary

www.dep.state.pa.us Printed on Recycled paper@
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

I N THE I NTEREST OF D .E.V., A CHI L D. § § § § § § No. 08-10-00205- CV

Appea l from 150th District Court of B exar County , Texas (TC # 2008-CI -20544)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION This appea l is before the Court on its own motion, for deter mination whether it should be dismiss ed for want of prosec ution. Finding that Appellant failed to pay the cas e fi ling fee , we dismiss the appe al for w ant of prose cution. Appellant filed his notice of appea l on J une 23, 2010. He did not pay the filing fee as require d by T E X .R .A P P .P. 5, nor did he establish his indige nce in acc ordanc e with T E X .R.A P P .P.
20.1. On J uly 19, 2010, the Clerk of the Court notified Appellant he had not paid the filing fee and advised that failure to pa

y the filing fee within twenty day s would result in dismissal of the appea l pursuant to T E X .R.A P P .P. 42. 3 (b ) an d (c ). Appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responde d to the Clerk’s inquiry . We theref ore dismiss the appea l.
September 29, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 9085]

*I. Renewal Of Advisory Committee.*                     The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the U.S. National Commission for the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, which operates pursuant to 22 U.S. Code 287o and the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), is a Federal Advisory Committee that provides recommendations to the U.S. Department of State.                

The recommendations relate to the formulation and implementation of U.S. policy towards UNESCO on matters of education, science, communications, and culture. Also, it functions as a liaison with organizations, institutions, and individuals in the United States interested in the work of UNESCO.

The committee is comprised of representatives from various non-governmental organizations focused on matters of education, science, culture, and communications. And it also includes at-large individuals and state, local, and federal government representatives. The committee meets to provide information on UNESCO related topics and make recommendations.

For further information, please call Allison Wright, U.S. Department of State, (202) 663-0026.

Dated: April 1, 2015.

Allison Wright,

Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2015-07917 Filed 4-6-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE CODE 4710-19-P
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the matter of the Estate of * From the County Court at Law

Mildred L. Ethridge, deceased, of Midland County,

Trial Court No. P-10778.

No. 11-16-00004-CV * December 8, 2016

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance 

with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason 

of this appeal are taxed against Fred D. Davis, Jr.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 24-2


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints Robert E. Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, William P.
Leiser and J. Christopher Kirk and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000, and to sign any or all amendments to
such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or
without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every
act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises,
as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or
their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.


                                        /s/ William F. Concannon
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        William F. Concannon
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 (ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 In
connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce A. Williamson, Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
 
 Date:
      May 7, 2009
                By:
                /s/   BRUCE A. WILLIAMSONBruce
      A. Williamson
                  Chairman
      of the Board, President and Chief Executive
  Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

t0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

146987

AIKATERINI ROUSAKI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 146987

COA: 308139 

Washtenaw CC: 10-001393-NO

LOLA SOULIOTIS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EL PASO COUNTY,

 Appellant,

v.

SUNLIGHT ENTERPRISES CO., INC.,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-16-00081-CV

Appeal from the

346th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2014DCV3555)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

trial court’s order granting Appellee’s motion for partial summary judgment and denying 

Appellant’s motion for partial summary judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order 

granting Appellee’s motion for partial summary judgment and denying Appellant’s motion for 

partial summary judgment and render judgment in favor of Appellant that Section 16.071(a) is 

inapplicable and does not render the seven-day notice provisions of Subparagraphs 13(A), (D) 

(F) void, and that it does not prevent Appellant from relying on those provisions in connection 

with Appellee’s claims for additional compensation and additional time. The case is remanded 

to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

We further order that Appellant recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which 

let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated February 3, 2000, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of ONTRACK Data International
Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
ONTRACK Data International Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-18969, effective
December 10, 1996 and File No. 333-87873, effective September 27, 1999) and on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-87871, effective October 6, 1999).


                                        /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 (ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 In
connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Holli C. Nichols, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of
the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
 
 Date:
      May 7, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      HOLLIC.NICHOLSHolli
      C. Nichols
                  Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
463.02383
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF OLD GUARD GROUP, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    SUBSIDIARY/ADDRESS                                              STATE OF INCORPORATION
    ------------------                                              ----------------------
    <S>                                                             <C>
    Old Guard Insurance Company                                     Pennsylvania
    P.O. Box 3010
    2929 Lititz Pike
    Lancaster, PA 17604

    Old Guard Fire Insurance Company                                Pennsylvania
    P.O. Box 3010
    2929 Lititz Pike
    Lancaster, PA 17604

    First Patriot Insurance Company                                 Pennsylvania
    P.O. Box 3010
    2929 Lititz Pike
    Lancaster, PA 17604

    New Castle Insurance Company of Delaware                        Delaware
    31 East South Street
    Smyrna, DE 19977

    First Delaware Insurance Company                                Delaware
    31 East South Street
    Smyrna, DE 19977

    Investors Southern Corporation                                  Virginia
    1051 East Cary Street
    Richmond, VA 23219

    Old Guard Insurance Management Company                          Pennsylvania
    P.O. Box 3010
    2929 Lititz Pike
    Lancaster, PA 17604

    2929 Service Corporation                                        Pennsylvania
    P.O. Box 3010
    2929 Lititz Pike
    Lancaster, PA 17604
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2006 of Xinhua China Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Clement Wu, Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
- The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 			   			Dated: November 17, 2006                                                                /s/ Clement Wu                                                                                                                                             Clement Wu, Chief Financial Officer			                                                                                                          and a Director (Principal Accounting			                                                                                                          Officer)
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration



### MAY Z 82015

Mr. Craig Greer FedEx Express 3131 Democrat Road Memphis, Tennessee 38118
Dear Mr. Greer: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S.W. Renton , Washington 98057-3356

This is in regard to your petition letter dated May 8, 2015, in which you requested exemption from the requirements of§§ 25.7850), 25.812(e), 25.857(e), and 25.1447(c)(2)(i) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. The exemption, ifgranted, would allow the carriage ofup to two supernumeraries in a Crew Rest Module (CRM) located in the Class E cargo compartment ofBoeing Model 767-300F, 767-300BCF, and 767-300BDSF freighter airplanes.
This request was posted to the Department ofTransportation's Federal Docket Management System (at Regulations.gov) on May 15, 2015, and has been assigned DocketNo. FAA2015-1731. We are in the process ofreviewing your request. We will contact you ifwe need additional information.
Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding your petition orthe petition process, please contact Mr. John Shelden at (425) 227-2785, or by e-mail at John.Shelden@faa.gov. Sincerely,

Deana M. Stedman Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service