alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     3rd Quarter 1999 10Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000853086
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund II
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,903
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                   391
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         50,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                 20,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 35,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,553
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     33,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   35,051
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,079
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               207
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                450
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   450
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### AMOS SAWYER, Respondent, *vs.*THE FARMERS’ AND MILLERS’ BANK, Appellant.

APPEAL PROM MILWAUKEE CIRCUIT COURT.

When a demurrer has Been overruled and defendant has ten days in which to answer, it is error for the plaintiff to sign judgment before the expiration of the ten days.

This is another appeal in the same case as the foregoing. On the 19th of April, the court made the order, from which the former appeal was taken, adjudging the demurrer frivolous, and giving the defendant ten days to answer. On the same day, the court, on application of the defendant, fixed the amount of undertaking for an appeal in the sum of $350.

On the same day, the plaintiff’s counsel filed an affidavit, that no answer had been served, whereupon a reference was ordered to the clerk to compute the amount due; report made, and final judgment entered.

*April*31 *st.*The defendant moved to set aside the judgment, because — ■ *“*1. It was entered after notice of an appeal given in open court, from the order of court overruling the demurrer of the defendant 3. It was entered on the first day of the present term, after the court, in the decision upon the matter of the demurrer, gave the defendant ten days within which to make answer to the complaint of the plaintiff, and without notice to the defendant or his attorney.”

*May 1st.*This motion was granted, and an order made *387vacating the judgment. From which order the plaintiff appealed.

*Smith fy Salomon,*for the Appellant.

*Nelson Cross,*for the Respondent

*Per Curiam,*

The order vacating the judgment must be affirmed. The order of the 19th of April gave the defendant ten days to answer, and although it may have been erroneous, it was nevertheless in force until set aside or reversed. The judgment' ought not to have been entered until the expiration of the ten days, and then only on motion. The order vacating the judgment is affirmed with costs.
Exhibit 32.2 – CFO 906 Certification




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Michael W. Zima, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:  March 25, 2011
/s/ Michael W. ZimaMichael W. ZimaChief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Douglas Johnson

2705 Adeline Dr. Burlingame, CA 94010

A petition to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption part 21 subpart H,§§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91 .109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a),91.203(a) and (b), 91.205(b), 91.215, part 91 subpart E of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The exemption would allow the petitioner to operate the DJI Phantom Vision 2 and the DJI F550 unmanned aircraft syste ms (UAS) to conduct aerial photography for real estate, surveying and marketing.

The petitioner proposes to operate the DJI F550 plus Zenmuse H43D gimbal

as well as a Phantom Vision UAS to conduct short duration ( >30 minute) aerial photography and videography for home owners, realtors, home builders,

and home con tractors for real estate marketing and inspections of home

exteriors.

Operation will use the AMA safety code as a minimum standard fo r safe operation. All flights will be in reasonably controlled environments with only crew and client allowed on location during operation.

Doug Johnson is a member in good standing of the AMA member number

1035203

Doug Johnson has worked in video and film pro d uction for 30 y ears and has the skill, experience and wisdom to safely operate UAS. This experience will be a benefit to consumers of aerial video and the public by combining experience in vid eo/film production with the safety of operating with

minimal exposure to the public for short duration flights

.

The UAS used commonly fits into the model aircraft ca tegory and In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Doug Johnson ’s operation of the DJI F 5 5 0

and P h a ntom Vision UAS meets the conditions of Section 333 and will not require

an airworthiness certif icate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.
# Miss. Guard Soldiers provide marksmanship tips in Iraq

/ Published Dec. 28, 2018

CAMP TAJI, Iraq – For soldiers worldwide, rifle marksmanship is one of the most basic skills all soldiers must possess.

 Iraqi soldiers are learning how tedious the training can be and what it takes to become an expert marksman.

 Mississippi Guard members of Task Force India Bravo instructed Iraqi army soldiers assigned to the Supply and Transportation Regiment on basic marksmanship in a weeklong primary marksmanship instruction class.

 The Iraqi soldiers were fully engaged with the essential training.

 "Training like this is going to give knowledge to the soldiers. In this way he can know everything he needs and that will make him a better soldier," said one Iraqi company commander with the Supply and Transportation Regiment.

 Though the soldiers may not be infantry, marksmanship skills are important to them.

 "Each and every soldier is supposed to know how to be a soldier first, so anything that he could learn is important," he said. "When we do our jobs we face many things, mechanical problems, casualties, and even death. If we can prepare our soldiers for this, they will be better."

 Though marksmanship is a basic skill universal to all services, the evaluation of marksmanship skill varies.

 "Their weapons qualification is completely different than ours, but that doesn’t matter when we teach basic marksmanship fundamentals – it is universal," said U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Michael Garner, security forces platoon sergeant assigned to Task Force India Bravo.

 The training was tailored to the needs of the Iraqi soldiers.

 "Prior to beginning training we assessed them on their skills, then we developed our training course based on a NATO Primary Method of Instruction," he said.

 The course layout mirrored the way the U.S. Army trains its Soldiers.

 "We taught a course including both classroom and practical exercises and we went from less than 10 percent to more than 75 percent being able to demonstrate weapons proficiency," said Garner.

 "We saw a drastic change in their accuracy of their marksmanship, after teaching the class," he said. "There was a 75 percent improvement from pre- to post-assessment."

 "To date we have trained approximately 500 soldiers," said Garner. "In the near future we will teach courses on advanced marksmanship techniques."
#### Lockwood v. Rogers et al., for the use of Brace.

1. Pi/EADiirGr.- — -Where there are two counts in a declaration, one of which is good and the other bad, a demurrer to the whole declaration will be overruled.

(1 *Chana.*21.)

ERROR to tbe late District Court for *Crawford*County.

The declaration iu this cause was in assumpsit containing two counts. The first was special, upon a written guaranty. The second, for work and labor, goods, etc.

The defendant demurred generally to the whole declaration, and the plaintiff joined in demurrer. The demurrer, on argument, was overruled.

The opinion of the court being upon a single point, precludes the necessity of a more specific statement of the case.

*Qollins (É Oatlin,*for plaintiff in error.

*Dunn, Jones*& *Crawford,*for defendant in error.

Stow, C. J.

The declaration in this case, which is in assump-sit, contains two counts : the first, a special one, on a written guaranty ; the second, the common *indebitatus*assumpsit for money, work, labor and goods. To this declaration the defendant demurred generally. The demurrer was overruled by the late district court, and to reverse this decision this writ of error is brought.. Whatever may be said of the first count of the declaration, there can be no doubt that the second is good; and the demurrer being to the whole declaration, it is well settled that it is not available, although had it been confined to the first count it might, perhaps, have been sustained. On this pomt, however, we give no opinion.-

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers of Bronco Energy Fund, Inc. (the  "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





                              /S/ DANIEL BAKER
DATE: AUGUST 15, 2005            NAME: DANIEL BAKER
                              TITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                              /S/ JAMES MARSHALL
DATE: AUGUST 15, 2005            NAME: JAMES MARSHALL
                              TITLE: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND TREASURER



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
#### Ex Parte Abram Wilson.

*Lunacy*— Practice.

Inquisitions of lunacy are ustuilly executed at the residence of the supposed lunatic, or in the vicinage; but that is a matter within the discretion of the Judge or Chancellor ordering the commission ; he may order it to be executed in another district.

The traverse of an inquisition of lunacy should, as a general rule, be tried in the district where the commission was executed; but that, also, seems to be a matter of discretion with the Judge or Chancellor ordering the traverse.

BEFORE WARDLAW, CH., AT CHARLESTON, JUNE, 1559.

The petitioner, who resided in Colleton district, was found to be a lunatic, by an inquisition held in Charleston, on the 17th March, 1S5.9; and this was a petition for leave to traverse the inquisition. His Honor granted the order, and directed the issue, when made up, to be tried in Charleston district.

The petitioner appealed, and moved this Court to modify the order, and direct the issue to be tried in Colleton.

*McCrady, Campbell,*for appellant.

*Hayne, Miles,*contra.

Authorities cited : *Smith vs. Petigru, 2*Strob. Eq., *322 ; ex parte Baker,*19 Ves., 340; Cooper, 205 ; *ex parte Smith,*1 Swan., 6; 2 Ves., 401 ; *in re Nugent,*3 Mol., 517; 12 Eng. Con. Ch. R., 594; *ex parte Hall,*7 Ves., 261, 254; Shelf, on Lunacy, 122; 14 Eng. Ch. R., 38.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’Neall, C. J.

From the earliest cases of which we have any account in this State, the commission in the nature of a *446writ *de lunático inquirendo*has been executed at the alleged lunatic’s residence, or in the vicinage. This was regarded as a convenient practice, both for the sake of the supposed lunatic, his family, friends, and the witnesses. But it is by no means so fixed and settled a rule as not to be departed from. Circumstances may make it necessary that it should be executed elsewhere. It is entirely a matter of discretion with the Chancellor or Judge ordering the inquisition.

Here, I have no doubt, the convenience of all was consulted, by having the inquisition executed in this city. Ordinarily, I should say, the traverse ought to be tried where the inquisition was found. That is more in harmony with the course of proceeding, and preserves the record in the same Court. But I have no doubt it may be tried in the jurisdiction where the alleged lunatic lives. On the present occasion, it has been so earnestly pressed upon the Court, and the Chancellor who allowed the traverse having, in this Court, of which he is a member, assented to the change of venue to Colleton district: it is, therefore, ordered, that the order allowing the traverse be so modified, that the traverse be made, docketed, and tried in Colleton district, at the next, or any subsequent term of the Court of Sessions of the peace, at which it may be practicable to try the same, and that the Judge presiding at the trial be requested to certify the verdict to the Court of Equity for Charleston district.

Johnstone and Wardlaw, JJ., concurred.

*Order modified.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Patrick J. Kealy,
Chief Executive Officer of Star Energy Corporation (the Company), certifies,
under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: August 20, 2007 | /s/ Patrick J. Kealy
Patrick J. Kealy
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
ANTHONY HIGHTOWER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2800

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Brantley S. Clark, Judge.

Anthony Hightower, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: March 19, 2015 519477 

________________________________

In the Matter of JONATHAN 

HURLEY, 

Appellant, 

v

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TINA STANFORD, as Chair of the 

New York State Board of 

Parole, et al., 

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: January 20, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________

Jonathan Hurley, Woodbourne, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Victor

Paladino of counsel), for respondents.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.),

entered September 2, 2014 in Sullivan County, which dismissed

petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR

article 78, to review a determination of respondent Board of

Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion. 

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.
-2- 519477 

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acrongenomics, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eleftherios Georgakopoulos, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  August 17, 2005

By:  /s/ Eleftherios Georgakopoulos

Name:  Eleftherios Georgakopoulos

Title:    Chief Executive Officer
CAPITOL OFFICE State Capitol 201 West Capitol Avenue Jefferson City, MO 65101-6806 Tele: (573) 751-4415 Fax: (573) 751-9758 E-Mail: Jamilah.Nasheed@senale.mo.gov

DISTRICT ADDRESS 4710 Lee Street St. Louis. MO 63115 Tele: (314)-385-6293

Gina McCarthy, Administrator Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Code: 1101A Washington, DC 20460 Jamilah Nasheed State Senator District 05 July 29, 2014 COMMITTEES: General Laws Governmental Accountability and Fiscal Oversight Gubernatorial Appointments Jobs, Economic Development and Local Govemment

^ rr_i

o 

# ^ r c7 C , ^

sA
—,
Ci.C^ 

# ^ C
--J

— i-i 3 J —, 'O ^ ^ zz .^: 

### ^i O

RE: Protecting Missouri communities from smog pollution Dear Administrator McCarthy: As the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers updated protections from dangerous smog (ground-level ozone) pollution, protection of public health and peer-reviewed science must be the standards used in making this decision. Health experts, epidemiologists, and numerous medical organizations have clearly stated that the existing Bush-era standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb) is not adequate to protect public health, particularly vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly and those with breathing ailments like asthma. These same experts report that smog pollution at levels as low as 55 or 60ppb can trigger asthma attacks and send children to the hospital. A 12-city EPA analysis showed that reducing the level of smog pollution to 60 parts per billion would save 4-5 times as many lives conipared to a weaker standard of 70 parts per billion. In order to best protect our public health, particularly children's health, I strongly urge you to set the standard at 60ppb. Missouri residents deserve to know if their air is clean or not, and so we are counting on EPA to use the best available science to set an accurate standard. Since the Clean Air Act was enacted into law more than 40 years ago, big polluters have tried at every turn to mislead the public and elected officials with doom and gloom economic scenarios. While they continue to cry wolf, the reality is that the Clean Air Act has been one of the most successful statutes ever signed into law. Their claims of economic catastrophe have never materialized. Thank you for your consideration, the opportunity to comment and for all EPA's work to protect communities from dangerous pollution. Sincerely yours, (^.,,uG^L ^aa^Za^^ Ja^m / ilah NasheedT4 

## _ ^

I 

# S O

qw "do CD 

# ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ O ^ /^ (^ 

# ^ 1 ^ ^C^ U 

# ^ ^^^ -^^ , ^ ^ ^ ^ O 

# ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ d ^ ^^^^ 

# ^o ^^ o 

# ^^-^^ z^ ^ 

# i ^^y ^ ^^
Arkansas troops develop farm as Agriculture Education Center
 
  By Air Force Lt. Col. Keith Moore
  ZABUL PROVINCE, Afghanistan, - The Arkansas National Guard's first Agriculture Development Team continues to drive forward with its mission to enhance the agriculture productivity and economic status of this southern Afghanistan province. The attached photos show progress at one of the team's two agricultural demonstration farms where the team works in conjunction with the Provincial Agriculture Department to demonstrate improved farming techniques, as well as test crop seeds for resiliency to environmental conditions and common pests.  With a multi-disciplined approach - growing fruit tree seedlings, greenhouse vegetables and open field row-crops - the ADT is building the demonstration farms into the focal points of agriculture education for the provincial agriculture department. The ADT is nearing the end of their yearlong deployment to Afghanistan, and will be replaced by the Arkansas Guard's second ADT in late January 2011.
EXHIBIT
32.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Holli C. Nichols, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge: (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly
 presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
 operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  Date: July 25, 2008
By:
/s/   HOLLI C. NICHOLSHolli C. NicholsExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer