alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RANDALL PETERSEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-2597

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Ross M. Goodman, Judge.

J. Christopher Klotz of Stevenson Klotz, LLP, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2728 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the coverage of 

Coronavirus Relief Fund payments to Tribal Governments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Ms. HIRONO, and Mr. SCHATZ) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend 

the coverage of Coronavirus Relief Fund payments to 

Tribal Governments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COVERAGE OF CORONAVIRUS 

4 RELIEF FUND PAYMENTS TO TRIBAL GOV5 ERNMENTS. 

6 Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(or, in the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2728 IS

1 case of a Tribal government, December 31, 2022)’’ after 

2 ‘‘December 31, 2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection
with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Holli C. Nichols, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of
the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)
the Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
 applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
 the dates and for the periods indicated.  Date: August
 7, 2008
By:
/s/ HOLLI
 C. NICHOLSHolli C. NicholsExecutive Vice President and Chief
 Financial Officer
RFS Speech

 My name is Andy Williams and I live in Omaha, Ne. I am testifying in support of the 

Renewable Fuel Standard and I hope you will consider my comments when making your 

decision.

I support a strong Federal RFS due to the many benefits it provides. These benefits include 

lower Greenhouse gas emissions, lower gas prices, less dependence of foreign oil, greater 

national security, and most importantly more American jobs including my own.

The proposal directly contradicts the EPA’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, 

increasing one of the world’s leading concerns, Global Warming. It also risks the elimination of 

thousands of American jobs. According to the Fuels America coalition, the renewable fuels 

industry – which includes biodiesel, conventional and cellulosic ethanol, as well as advanced 

biofuels and their suppliers – supported 852,000 jobs in 2014. This is an American built 

industry that is leading the world in the production of the cleanest and most sustainable liquid 

transportation fuel. These fuels are available today thanks in part to the Renewable fuel 

Standard.

I was hired in February of 2012 to be a plant operator. Since then I have been promoted to 

Lead Operator at Novozymes in Blair, Ne. I oversee 6 operators not including myself and half 

of our plant on my shift. Our site is a major producer of enzymes that are used in the cellulosic 

and corn based ethanol plants. Together with customers, partners and the global community, 

we strive to improve industrial performance while preserving the planet’s resources and helping 

to build better lives. This is accomplished by our enzymes ability to increase yields while 

decreasing our customers energy/water costs to operate. Our site broke ground in November 

of 2009 and started producing products in July of 2012 specifically for the biofuel industry. In 

our almost 3 years of operation we have gone from start-up to leading our company worldwide 

in almost all of the enzymes for bio-fuel we produce, while also having drastically reduced our 

energy and water costs. We are driven at Novozymes by the will to change our world for the 

better. Novozymes management has worked extensively to try and ensure all 100+ employees 

on our site have long term career opportunities. I am excited and feel privileged to work for a 

company that is working towards a greener and cleaner world. Please help ensure we can 

continue our company and personal goals towards a better tomorrow.

In the final rule, the EPA should require obligated parties to comply with the law by blending 

increasing volumes of renewable fuels. Please support American jobs, a cleaner environment 

and greater national security. A stable RFS is a big step towards a better tomorrow.

Sincerely,

Andrew Williams
State of Israel 

Ministry of Transport 

Civil Aviation Authority 

Page 1 of 2

 G:\AIRW-EN\AD\AD G100\AD 31-06-11-05\AD 31-06-11-05R1.doc 

 AD 31-06-11-05R1 

 Date: May 18, 2011

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

 

This Airworthiness Directive, issued by the Civil Aviation Authority in accordance with the 

Israeli Aviation Regulations, applies to an aircraft for which our records list you as the registered 

owner. It affects aviation safety and requires your immediate attention. No person may operate an 

aircraft to which an Airworthiness Directive applies, except in accordance with that Directive. 

APPLIES TO: Gulfstream Aerospace LP (GALP) Models 1125 ASTRA, ASTRA SPX 

and G100 aircraft, all serial numbers except S/N 158, certificated in any 

category. 

SUBJECT: Separation of Main Entry Door (MED) and MED Inflateable Seal warning 

lights. 

 Revision 1 is introduced to limit the calendar time for accomplishment of 

 this AD and revise the possible results of MED incomplete closure. 

REASON: To increase pilots' awareness to the possibility of incomplete closure of the 

Main Entry Door (MED) by the following means: 

1. Splitting the common caution light CABIN DOOR signaling both MED 

Improper Closure and MED Inflatable Seal Failure into two separate 

lights: CABIN DOOR and CABIN DOOR SEAL. 

2. Converting the separated CABIN DOOR Caution light into a Warning 

light by changing its color to red. 

 NOTE: Airplane Flight Manuals (AFM'S) refer to these changes as 

 MOD G1-20052. 

 Incomplete closure of the MED may be followed by in-flight opening and 

 possible separation of the door. As a result, the MED, the adjacent fuselage 

 structure and other parts of the aircraft may be damaged due to opening 

 forces and landing impact. 

 Damage to the aircraft structure and to the left engine by flying debris and 

 objects may also occur. 

 Injury and damage to people and property on the ground may be caused by 

 falling debris and objects. 

 
State of Israel 

Ministry of Transport 

Civil Aviation Authority 

Page 2 of 2

 G:\AIRW-EN\AD\AD G100\AD 31-06-11-05\AD 31-06-11-05R1.doc 

 AD 31-06-11-05R1 

ACTION: Unless previously accomplished, perform the changes listed below in 

 accordance with Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100-31-284, original issue 

or later approved revision: 

 Modify the Warning & Caution Lights Panel (WACLP). 

Change the WACLP and MED wiring. 

 Change the wiring harness connecting the MED to the WACLP. 

Verify that the Log of Modification of the AFM includes reference to 

MOD G1-20052. If no reference is found, update the AFM. 

 

COMPLIANCE: Compliance with this AD is required within 250 flight hours after June 10, 

 2009 (the effective date of the original issue of this AD), but no later than 

December 31, 2011. 

EFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. N. Kletshevsky, Engineering, 

Airworthiness Dept. - P.O.Box 1101, Airport City, Israel 70100. 

Telephone: 972-3-9774-539, Fax: 972-3-9774-592, e-mail: kletshn@mot.gov.il.
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 
 COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 
 Medivation, Inc.

 Cash Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 

 

					
	 Annual Retainer, all members
	  	$	50,000	  
	 Additional Annual Retainer for Chairman
	  	$	50,000	  
	 Annual Retainer for Committee Chairs:
	  			
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	25,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	20,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$	15,000	  
	 Annual Retainer for Other Committee Members:
	  			
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	15,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$	7,500	  

 Medivation, Inc. 
 Equity Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
 Upon initial election to
the Board of Directors, each non-employee director receives an initial grant of (1) an option to purchase 15,000 shares of Medivation’s common stock with an exercise price per share equal to the closing sales price of a share of
Medivation’s common stock on the date of grant, and (2) a restricted stock unit to acquire 7,500 shares of Medivation’s common stock. The stock option vests over four years, with 25% of the shares vesting on the one year anniversary
of the date of grant, and the remainder vesting monthly in 36 equal installments over the next three years. The restricted stock unit vests in three equal installments over three years in accordance with Medivation’s company policy. 

Each non-employee director receives an annual grant of a stock option and a restricted stock unit, in each case for the number of shares
as shall give the respective grant a Black-Scholes value of $175,000. The stock option has an exercise price per share equal to the closing sales price of a share of Medivation’s common stock on the date of grant. Both the stock option and the
restricted stock unit vest after one year.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Martin Dewayne Walters, * From the 358th District Court

 of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. D-39,916.

Vs. No. 11-16-00182-CR * December 8, 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
Opinion filed December 8, 2016

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-16-00091-CV

___________

CARTER SCOTT D/B/A CARTER SCOTT LAND SERVICES,

Appellant

V.

OLLIE STEPHEN OATMAN; TAMRA SHAE OATMAN; LEIGH 

OATMAN, TRUSTEE FOR THE CALLIE OATMAN TRUST; 

AND JAMES L. WILKS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 32nd District Court

Nolan County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19,563-A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Carter Scott has filed in this court a motion to dismiss this appeal. Scott states

that the underlying litigation from which this appeal arose has been compromised 

and settled, and Scott requests that we dismiss the appeal without prejudice. In 

accordance with Scott’s request, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
2

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

December 8, 2016

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
#### Appleton vs. Barrett and others.

*Verdict in Replevin.*

In replevin, the title to the property, as well as the present right of possession, being in issue, defendant is entitled to have the former question passed upon by the verdict.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Sheboygan*County.

Beplevin, for a great variety of chattels, some of which are described in the schedule attached to the complaint as, “ at passenger depot, Sheboygan, and freight house adjacent;” others as “at Plymouth station;” “at Glenbeulah station;” “on Sheboygan engine;” “in shop,” etc., etc. The plaintiff alleges ownership and right of possession in himself. The answer, after a general denial, alleges that the goods are the property of the Sheboygan & Pond du Lac R. B. Co.; that • defendant is the receiver of said company, duly appointed by'order of court, etc.; that *part*of the property came into his possession as such receiver, by virtue of said order; that defendant never claimed any other possession or control over it except by virtue of said order; and that he had never been in the possession of the rest of said property.

The jury found that plaintiff was entitled to recover the possession of certain described articles mentioned in the *569complaint, and assessed the value thereof, with damages for the detention. Judgment in plaintiff’s favor in the alternative for the possession or the value, and for the damages, etc.; and defendant appealed.

*J. A.*Bentley, for appellant,

cited *Child v. Child,*13 Wis., *17; Smith v. Phelps, 1*id., 211; *Swain v. Boys,*4 id., 150; *Bonge v. Dawson,*9 id., 246; *Bose v. Tolly,*15 id., 443; *Paterson v. U. S.,*2 Wheat., 221; *Bemus v. Beekman,*3 Wend., 667.

*B. S. Bragg,*for respondent.

[Eo brief on file.]

Dixon, O. J.

The title of the property, as well as the right of possession, was in issue by the pleadings. The jury have found only that the plaintiff is entitled to the possession of the property specified in the verdict. The issue as to the title is undetermined. • In the action of replevin both parties are considered as actors. It may he that the title to the property was in the defendant, the plaintiff having only the present right of possession. The question of title, therefore, is, or may he, one of much interest to the defendant, and he is entitled to have it settled in this action. The verdict being in this respect defective, the judgment must, according to the decision of this court in *Child v. Child,*13 Wis., 17, be reversed, and a new trial awarded.

*By the Court.*— Ordered accordingly.
#### Sarah C. Grady, trustee, *et al.,*plaintiffs in error, *vs.*Nathaniel H. Barden, defendant in error.

The fact that the defendant in error was the clerk of the superior court who certified the transcript of the record and the bill of exceptions, does not cure the absence of service. (R.)

Service. Officers. Practice in the Supreme Court. January Term, 1875.

When this case was called a motion was made to dismiss the writ of error because no service appeared on the bill of exceptions. It was replied that the defendant in error was the clerk of the superior court who certified the record and bill of exceptions, and therefore had full notice of all the proceedings in the case. The writ of error was dismissed.

B. H. Bigham; F. M. Longley, by brief, for plaintiffs in error.

E. H. Worried; James M. Mobley, for defendant.
2024 X Stat Chat Calendar

@usda_nass

Month Date Time Topic

January 12 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

31 4 p.m. ET Cattle

February 8 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

14 1 p.m. ET 2024 Census of Agriculture 

March 8 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

28 1 p.m. ET Prospective Plantings

28 4 p.m. ET Hogs/Pigs

April 11 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

May 10 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

June 12 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

27 4 p.m. ET Hogs/Pigs

28 1 p.m. ET Acreage

July 12 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

19 4 p.m. ET Cattle

August 12 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

September 12 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

26 4 p.m. ET Hogs/Pigs

30 1 p.m. ET Grain Stocks

October 11 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

November 8 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

14 4 p.m. ET Census: Irrigation and Water Management

December 10 1 p.m. ET Crop Production

16 4 p.m. ET Census of Aquaculture

23 4 p.m. ET Hogs/Pigs

*Stat Chat start times may be delayed due to the livestream on National Agricultural Statistics Service - YouTube.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(b)
                                                              Form 10-K for 1996
                                                           File No. 333-08645-01

                            AT&T Capital Corporation

                              Management Assertion

In  accordance  with the terms of the  Transfer  and  Servicing  Agreement dated
as of  October  1, 1996  between  AT&T  Capital  Corporation (the "Company") and
The Chase  Manhattan  Bank,  as  Indenture  Trustee  for  the  Capita  Equipment
Receivables Trust 1996-1 (the  "Agreement"),  the  Company  is  responsible  for
servicing  leases and  loans  that  are  the  subject of the  Agreement.  As  of
December 31, 1996, management  of  the  Company  believes  that it complied with
its  servicing responsibilities  under the Agreement  by  maintaining  effective
internal controls over financial reporting of the lease and loan servicing based
on the criteria established  in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued  by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

                                         AT&T Capital Corporation

                                         By:     E. M. Dwyer
                                            _____________________
                                            E. M. Dwyer
                                            Senior Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
# New York National Guard, Brazil Army Train Together

/ Published Nov. 16, 2023

MACAPA, Brazil - The New York Army National Guard Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 1st Battalion, 258th Field Artillery, 27th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, and Brazilian Army field artillery soldiers trained together for the first time during exercise Southern Vanguard 24 in Brazil. 

The New York National Guard and Brazil are partners through the Department of Defense National Guard Bureau State Partnership Program.

The proposal to join forces to cross-train was conceptualized months ahead of Southern Vanguard 24.

Brazilian Army Capt. Rodrigo Ayres Chaves, fire support officer with the 52nd Taskforce, observed the 258th Field Artillery training in August during the Northern Strike operation.

“It’s good to see new stuff and new ways of thinking,” said Chaves. “It’s always good to revise and improve our way of planning.”

Ayers coordinated with U.S. Army National Guard Capt. Anthony Migliore, the assistant battalion fire support officer assigned to HHB, 1st Battalion, 258th Field Artillery, to facilitate interoperable training for Southern Vanguard 24 while strengthening security partnerships in the Americas.

“It’s in order to help the integration with the Brazilian Army, understand the tactics, techniques and procedures, take a look at how they do their fire support, and just start to build that relationship,” said Migliore.

Despite the language barrier, Migliore quickly recognized more similarities than differences between the two armies in planning and conducting fire support.

The exercise began with the assault and objective phase near Ferreira Gomes. The field artillery teams provided section fires and fired smoke target in and around the two objectives. 

“I spent most of my time at the gun line yesterday and it was just like being back at A Battery or B Battery with the 258th,” Migliore said. “13B, which is an artillery MOS (military occupational specialty) like a gun-bunny, is the same across U.S. or Brazil. The way they prepare the gun, the way they aim the gun and also just the culture of artillery, it was very familiar, which is cool.”

The second phase occurred off the Amazon River in Oiapoque, with the field artillery teams providing fire support.

The relationships built and sustained with the multinational partners in South America through exercises and professional and military exchanges help preserve peace and stability in the region.

“I think it has been rewarding working with them, seeing how excited they are to see how we do things and reconfirm a lot of their stuff that they already do. They just didn’t realize it was that similar to us,” said Master Sgt. Scott Banks, the battalion fire support noncommissioned officer with the HHB, 1st Battalion, 258th Field Artillery. “They really enjoyed us explaining how we do things and teaching them, broadening their horizon. We built some good friendships here.”
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of In Full Affect,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Daniel L. Hodges,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting  Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Sandro
      Natale, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  the
        Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  the
        information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


Date: August 29, 2007
                
                /s/ Sandro NataleName:
                  Sandro NataleTitle: President and CEO


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.