alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
12:00 P.M.

United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

March Crop Production

Executive Summary

Lance Honig, Chief

Crops Branch

March 9, 2017
USDA-NASS

3-9-17

Field Crops Fruit & Nuts Specialty Crops

Sugarcane Citrus

Contents
USDA-NASS

3-9-17

Objective Surveys

(Size and Drop)

Fruit Maturity Row Count

Survey Type Field Observations Laboratory Tests Field Observations

Crops Included Valencia Oranges

Honey Tangerines

Valencia Oranges Oranges

Grapefruit

Royal and Honey 

Tangerines

Tangelos

Sample Size 935 groves 148 samples 114,671 rows

Collection 

Period

February 15-22 February 23-24 February 23-24

Testing Period February 27

Survey Overview

Florida Citrus
USDA-NASS

3-9-17

March 2017 Crop Production

% Change % Change

From From

Crop Unit March Previous Previous

2017 Forecast Season 

Production

Oranges Mil Tons 5.16 -3.4 -12.6

Grapefruit Thou Tons 754 -0.5 -6.1

Tangerines & 

Mandarins Thou Tons 990 -0.3 +3.9
12.7

13.7

9.80

13.0

12.2 12.4

11.5

12.9

9.30

9.02

7.63

10.1

9.10

8.24

8.91 8.98

8.27

6.77

6.35

5.91

5.16

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

Million Tons

Orange Production

United States

USDA-NASS

3-9-17
USDA-NASS

3-9-17

March 2017 Crop Production

From From

March Previous Previous

2017 Forecast Season 

Production 

Sugarcane Mil Tons 32.1 -2.6 -<0.1

Crop Unit 
USDA-NASS

3-9-17

Release Date Report Title

March 10 Price Reactions after USDA Crop Reports

March 24 Cattle on Feed

March 30 Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

Agricultural Prices

March 31

Prospective Plantings

Grain Stocks 

Rice Stocks

April 3

CAIR: Grain Crushings

CAIR: Fats & Oils

CAIR: Cotton System

April 11 Crop Production

Cotton Ginnings Annual

Upcoming Reports
United States Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Statistics Service

All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

202-720-2127

800-727-9540

nass@nass.usda.gov
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

May 2, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00169

- CV

Rufel L. ESTRADA

, Appella nt

v.

Tatiana ESTRADA

, Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CI00328 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on March 15, 2017, and an affidavit of indigency on March 16, 2017. The court reporter, Kayleen Rivera, filed a motion to req uire the appellant to prove his inability to pay costs on appeal

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(f). On April 3, 2017, t he trial court held an eviden tiary hearing on the court reporter’s motion , made findings, and ordered appellant to pay the costs of court, appeal, and preparation of the repor ter’s record.

On April 3, 2017, a ppellant filed a motion in this court seeking review of the trial court’s order. See id . 145(g) (1)

. On April 13, 2017, t he reporter’s record from the hearing was filed. On April 21, 2017, a limited clerk’s record was file d. We have reviewed the reporter’s record

, the clerk’s record , and the trial court’s order requiring appellant to pay the costs of court, appeal, and preparation of the reporter’s record

. T he trial court’s April 3, 2017 order is AFFIRMED

. See id

. 145(g)(4)

.
The clerk’s record and the reporter’s record are due on May 5, 2017.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of May, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of iVoice, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify, pursuant  to
and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Jerome R. Mahoney
 Jerome R. Mahoney
 President, Chief Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer
[No. 15554.

Department Two.

September 28, 1894.]

#### THOMAS KELLY, Respondent, *v.*WILLIAM B. BRADBURY, Appellant.

Appeal — Review op Evidence — Failure op Respondent to File Bribe. Where it appears from the record upon appeal that the verdict of the jury is assailed by specifications on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support it, and there is no brief on file by the respondent, and the case is not orally argued in his brief, the judgment and order appealed from will be reversed.

Appeal from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of tbe City and County of San Francisco.

Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.

*Gordon & Young,*for Appellant.

*Charles A. Low,*for Respondent.

Fitzgerald, J.

It appears from tbe record that tbe verdict of tbe jury is assailed by the specifications, on tbe ground of tbe insufficiency of tbe evidence to support it.

There is no brief on file by respondent, nor was tbe case orally argued in his behalf; it therefore follows, on the authority of *Richter*v. *Fresno etc. Co.,*101 Cal. 582, and *Davis*v. *Hart,*103 Cal. 530, that the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.

So ordered

McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred;
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1329

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Ivan Avalos Espinoza lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________ Submitted: November 21, 2023 Filed: November 30, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Following his guilty plea to a drug offense, Ivan Avalos Espinoza (Avalos)

appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motions challenging the search of two cell phones. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Avalos’s request for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), as he failed to show that information necessary to the finding of probable cause had been intentionally or recklessly omitted from the warrant application. See United States v. Short, 2 F.4th 1076, 1077, 1080 (8th Cir. 2021) (denial of Franks hearing is reviewed for abuse of discretion; to merit a hearing, defendant must make a substantial preliminary showing that the warrant affiant deliberately or recklessly omitted information necessary to the finding of probable cause). We also conclude that the district court did not err in denying Avalos’s motion to suppress, as there was a fair probability that evidence of drug trafficking would be found on the phones. See United States v. Holly, 983 F.3d 361, 363 (8th Cir. 2020) (in reviewing denial of a motion to suppress, district court’s legal conclusions are reviewed de novo); see also United States v. James, 52 F.4th 1035, 1038 (8th Cir. 2022) (probable cause to support search is present when there is fair probability that evidence of crime will be found in particular place); United States v. Eggerson, 999 F.3d 1121, 1127 (8th Cir. 2021) (it was reasonable to infer that cell phones found at a location associated with drug trafficking and on the person of an individual associated with drug trafficking had a fair probability of containing evidence of the crime).

1 The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Michael D. Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2-Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

-3-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      34,320
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                      12,077
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          500
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   113,500
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,122
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,000
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            62,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (52,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (52,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (52,942)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.004)


</TABLE>
Order filed December 8, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00818-CV

____________

IN THE MATTER OF THE VEIT JOHNNES BRIMER AND NATALIA 

ERSHOVA BRIMER

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-01507

ORDER

This appeal is from a judgment signed July 12, 2016. The district clerk 

notified this court that the trial court granted a motion for new trial filed by appellant 

Natalie Ershova Brimer. The clerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, the 

Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a partial clerk’s record by December 

19, 2016, containing (1) the trial court’s judgment; (2) the motion for new trial; and 

(3) the trial court’s ruling on the motion for new trial.

PER CURIAM
SANGUI BIOTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                              A Colorado corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sangui Biotech International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Wolfgang Barnikol, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant
to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sangui Biotech
International, Inc., and will be retained by Sangui Biotech International, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



Date: May 23, 2005                        By: /s/ Wolfgang Barnikol
                                              _______________________________
                                              Wolfgang Barnikol
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Patrick J. Kealy, Chief Executive Officer of Star Energy Corporation (the Company), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 15, 2008 |  | /s/ Patrick J. Kealy                 
|                       |  | Patrick J. Kealy                     
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0521 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-010-AD

Helicopter Model: various model helicopters with certain part-numbered and serial-numbered 

Goodrich externally-mounted hoists installed.

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 1,378 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect conditions that may result in failure of the 

hoist and injury to persons being lifted. 

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $95,000 for replacement

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour x $85/workhour for the inspection)

(0.5 work-hour x 

$85/work-hour for the 

replacement)

$85

$43

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $85 for the inspection

$95,043 for the replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $117,130 for the inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Wilbanks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**ELMER DAVENPORT,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 35 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 5th day of May, 2016, the Application for Leav e to File Original** 

**Process is**  GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extr aordinary** 

**Relief is** DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 31.2 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 

RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF1934 

AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Michael Kravchenko, Chief Financial Officer of Star Energy Corporation (the“Company”), certify that: 

1.        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of theCompany; 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.        The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

a.        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b.        Evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

c.        Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (in the case of an annual report, the fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.        The Company’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

a.        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18226-18227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07787]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9020-3]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 03/23/2015 Through 03/27/2015
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20150083, Final EIS, USFS, AK, Resurrection Creek Phase II: 
Stream and Riparian Restoration Project and Hope Mining Company 
Proposed Mining Plan of Operations, Review Period Ends: 05/04/2015, 
Contact: Karen Kromrey 907-288-7745.
EIS No. 20150084, Final EIS, NPS, CA, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National 
Parks Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Review Period Ends: 05/04/2015, 
Contact: Nancy Hendricks 559-565-3102.
EIS No. 20150085, Final EIS, FTA, WA, Lynnwood Link Extension, Review 
Period Ends: 05/04/2015, Contact: Daniel Drais 206-220-4465
EIS No. 20150086, Final EIS, USN, CA, Naval Base Coronado Coastal 
Campus, Review Period Ends: 05/04/2015, Contact: Teresa Bresler 619-
556-7315.
EIS No. 20150087, Draft EIS, USFS, ID, Johnson Bar Fire Salvage, 
Comment Period Ends: 05/18/2015, Contact: Mike Ward 208-926-6413.
EIS No. 20150088, Draft EIS, USMC, 00, Commonwealth of the Northern 
Mariana Islands (CJMT) Joint Military Training, Comment Period Ends: 
06/02/2015, Contact: Lori Robertson 808-472-1409.
EIS No. 20150089, Draft EIS, NIH, MD, NIH Chilled Water System 
Improvements, Comment Period Ends: 06/05/2015, Contact: Mark Radtke 
301-451-6467.
EIS No. 20150090, Draft EIS, FTA, VA, Potomac Yard Metrorail Station, 
Comment Period Ends: 05/18/2015, Contact: Melissa Barlow. 202-219-3565.
EIS No. 20150091, Final EIS, CALTRANS, CA, San Diego Freeway

[[Page 18227]]

(I-405) Improvement Project, Review Period Ends: 05/04/2015, Contact: 
Smita Deshpande 949-724-2000.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20150062, Draft EIS, USFS, CA, Westside Fire Recovery Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 04/27/2015, Contact: Wendy Coats 530-841-4470.

    Dated: March 31, 2015.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2015-07787 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P