18812 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 67 / Wednesday, April 8, 2015 / Notices 

4See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

5See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

6See 19 CFR 351.310(d)(1). 

7See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

8 In these preliminary results, the Department 

applied the assessment rate calculation method 

adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 

of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

9See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011). 

10See Frontseating Service Valves from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Sunset 

Review and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, 

79 FR 27573 (May 14, 2014). 

1See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation and 

Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review, and Intent To Revoke Order In Part, 80 FR 

11396 (March 3, 2015) (Initiation and Preliminary 

Results). 

2See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Hand 

Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s 

Republic of China, 69 FR 70122 (December 2, 2004) 

(Order). 

five days after the written comments are 

filed.4

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice.5 Hearing requests should 

contain the following information: (1) 

The party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of the issues 

to be discussed. Oral presentations will 

be limited to issues raised in the briefs. 

If a request for a hearing is made, parties 

will be notified of the time and date for 

the hearing to be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230.6

Unless otherwise extended, the 

Department intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

which will include the results of its 

analysis of issues raised in any such 

comments, within 120 days of 

publication of these preliminary results, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results of 

this review, the Department will 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review.7 The 

Department intends to issue appropriate 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after publication of the final results of 

this review. 

For any individually examined 

respondent whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis, 

we will calculate importer-specific ad 

valorem duty assessment rates based on 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).8 For duty assessment 

rates calculated on this basis, we will 

direct CBP to assess the resulting ad 

valorem rate against the entered 

customs values for the subject 

merchandise. 

The Department announced a 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement 

in practice, for entries that were not 

reported in the U.S. sales databases 

submitted by companies individually 

examined during this review, the 

Department will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide 

rate. In addition, if the Department 

determines that an exporter under 

review had no shipments of the subject 

merchandise, any suspended entries 

that entered under that exporter’s case 

number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will 

be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.9

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Because the antidumping duty order 

on frontseating service valves from the 

PRC was revoked,10 the Department will 

not issue cash deposit instructions at 

the conclusion of this administrative 

review. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing notice 

of these results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: March 31, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Background 

2. Scope of the Order 

3. Non-Market Economy Country 

4. Separate Rates 

5. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value 

Data 

6. Surrogate Country 

7. Economic Comparability 

8. Significant Producers of Identical or 

Comparable Merchandise 

9. Data Availability 

10. Date of Sale 

11. Comparisons to Normal Value 

12. Constructed Export Price 

13. Value-Added Tax 

14. Normal Value 

15. Factor Valuations 

16. Currency Conversion 

[FR Doc. 2015–08120 Filed 4–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–891] 

Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review and 

Revocation, in Part 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 3, 2015, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published its notice of 

initiation and preliminary results of 

changed circumstances review, and 

intent to revoke, in part, the 

antidumping (AD) duty order on hand 

trucks and certain parts thereof (hand 

trucks) from the People’s Republic of 

China (PRC).1 We invited parties to 

comment and received no comments. 

Therefore, we are now revoking the 

order, in part, with respect to certain 

multifunction carts meeting the 

specifications described below. 

DATES: Effective Dates: December 1, 

2012 (AD order). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Hoefke at (202) 482–4947 or 

Robert James at (202) 482–0649; AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 2, 2004, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD order on hand trucks from the PRC.2

On December 9, 2014, in accordance 

with sections 751(b) and 751(d)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

19 CFR 351.216(b), and 19 CFR 

351.222(g)(1), Positec USA, Inc. and RW 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 67 / Wednesday, April 8, 2015 / Notices 18813 

3See Initiation and Preliminary Results. 

4 Id. 

5See Letter from Petitioners, ‘‘Hand Trucks and 

Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of 

China: Petitioner’s Statement That It Has No 

Interest In the WORX Aerocart Being Subject to the 

Order,’’ dated December 10, 2014 at 3. 

Direct, Inc. (collectively, Positec), 

importers, requested revocation, in part, 

of the Order with respect to its WORX 

Aerocart (Aerocart) as part of a changed 

circumstances review. Positec requested 

that the Department conduct the 

changed circumstances review on an 

expedited basis pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3)(ii). On March 3, 2015, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register the Initiation and Preliminary 

Results. As noted above, we gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Initiation and 

Preliminary Results. We received no 

comments from interested parties. 

Therefore, we are now revoking the 

Order, in part, with respect to certain 

multifunction carts meeting the 

specifications described below. 

Scope of Changed Circumstances 

Review 

The merchandise covered by this 

changed circumstances review is a 

multifunction cart that combines, 

among others, the capabilities of a 

wheelbarrow and dolly. The product 

comprises a steel frame that can be 

converted from vertical to horizontal 

functionality, two wheels toward the 

lower end of the frame and two 

removable handles near the top. In 

addition to a foldable projection edge in 

its extended position, it includes a 

permanently attached steel tub or 

barrow. This product is currently 

available under proprietary trade names 

such as the ‘‘Aerocart.’’ 

The scope of the Order will be 

modified to read as stated below. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to this Order 

consists of hand trucks manufactured 

from any material, whether assembled 

or unassembled, complete or 

incomplete, suitable for any use, and 

certain parts thereof, namely the vertical 

frame, the handling area and the 

projecting edges or toe plate, and any 

combination thereof. 

A complete or fully assembled hand 

truck is a hand-propelled barrow 

consisting of a vertically disposed frame 

having a handle or more than one 

handle at or near the upper section of 

the vertical frame; at least two wheels at 

or near the lower section of the vertical 

frame; and a horizontal projecting edge 

or edges, or toe plate, perpendicular or 

angled to the vertical frame, at or near 

the lower section of the vertical frame. 

The projecting edge or edges, or toe 

plate, slides under a load for purposes 

of lifting and/or moving the load. 

That the vertical frame can be 

converted from a vertical setting to a 

horizontal setting, then operated in that 

horizontal setting as a platform, is not 

a basis for exclusion of the hand truck 

from the scope of this petition. That the 

vertical frame, handling area, wheels, 

projecting edges or other parts of the 

hand truck can be collapsed or folded is 

not a basis for exclusion of the hand 

truck from the scope of the petition. 

That other wheels may be connected to 

the vertical frame, handling area, 

projecting edges, or other parts of the 

hand truck, in addition to the two or 

more wheels located at or near the lower 

section of the vertical frame, is not a 

basis for exclusion of the hand truck 

from the scope of the petition. Finally, 

that the hand truck may exhibit physical 

characteristics in addition to the vertical 

frame, the handling area, the projecting 

edges or toe plate, and the two wheels 

at or near the lower section of the 

vertical frame, is not a basis for 

exclusion of the hand truck from the 

scope of the petition. 

Examples of names commonly used to 

reference hand trucks are hand truck, 

convertible hand truck, appliance hand 

truck, cylinder hand truck, bag truck, 

dolly, or hand trolley. They are typically 

imported under heading 8716.80.5010 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS), although 

they may also be imported under 

heading 8716.80.5090. Specific parts of 

a hand truck, namely the vertical frame, 

the handling area and the projecting 

edges or toe plate, or any combination 

thereof, are typically imported under 

heading 8716.90.5060 of the HTSUS. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the Department’s written 

description of the scope is dispositive. 

Excluded from the scope are small 

two-wheel or four-wheel utility carts 

specifically designed for carrying loads 

like personal bags or luggage in which 

the frame is made from telescoping 

tubular material measuring less than 5/ 

8 inch in diameter; hand trucks that use 

motorized operations either to move the 

hand truck from one location to the next 

or to assist in the lifting of items placed 

on the hand truck; vertical carriers 

designed specifically to transport golf 

bags; and wheels and tires used in the 

manufacture of hand trucks. 

Excluded from the scope is a 

multifunction cart that combines, 

among others, the capabilities of a 

wheelbarrow and dolly. The product 

comprises a steel frame that can be 

converted from vertical to horizontal 

functionality, two wheels toward the 

lower end of the frame and two 

removable handles near the top. In 

addition to a foldable projection edge in 

its extended position, it includes a 

permanently attached steel tub or 

barrow. This product is currently 

available under proprietary trade names 

such as the ‘‘Aerocart.’’ 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review, and Revocation 

of the AD Order in Part 

At the request of Positec, and in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

(d)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.216, and 

19 CFR 351.222(g)(1), the Department 

initiated a changed circumstances 

review of the Order on hand trucks from 

the PRC to determine whether partial 

revocation of the Order is warranted 

with respect to certain multifunction 

carts.3 In addition, we determined that 

expedited action is warranted and, 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii), 

we combined the notices of initiation 

and preliminary results.4 Based on the 

expression of no interest by Petitioners, 

which stated that they are producers 

accounting for substantially all of the 

production of the domestic like product 

in support of the Order,5 and absent any 

objections by other domestic interested 

parties, we preliminarily determined 

that substantially all of the domestic 

producers of the like product have no 

interest in the continued application of 

the AD Order on hand trucks from the 

PRC to the merchandise that is subject 

to Positec’s request. Therefore, we 

preliminarily determined that partial 

revocation of the Order is appropriate. 

Accordingly, we notified the public of 

our intent to revoke, in part, the AD 

Order with respect to certain 

multifunction carts. We did not receive 

any comments from parties objecting to 

the partial revocation. Because all 

parties to the proceeding agree to the 

outcome of the review, we are issuing 

these final results of changed 

circumstances review within 45 days of 

initiation in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.216(e). 

Therefore, in accordance with 

sections 751(d)(1) and 782(h) of the Act, 

and 19 CFR 351.222(g)(1)(i), the 

Department is partially revoking the AD 

Order on hand trucks from the PRC with 

respect to certain multifunction carts 

meeting the specifications described 

above. This partial revocation will be 

applied to entries of the certain 

multifunction cart entered or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption, on or 

after December 1, 2012, which 

corresponds to the day following the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18814 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 67 / Wednesday, April 8, 2015 / Notices 

6See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011– 

2012, 79 FR 44008 (July 29, 2014). 

1See Antidumping Duty Order: Glycine from the 

People’s Republic of China, 60 FR 16116 (March 29, 

1995) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 24398 (April 

30, 2014). 

3See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China; 2013–2014’’ from Gary Taverman, Associate 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), for a 

complete description of the scope of the order. 

4See Order. 

5See Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Acting Director, Office VI, Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, through Angelica 

Townshend, Program Manager, Office VI, 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

from Ericka Ukrow, International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, Office VI, titled ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Glycine from the People’s 

Republic of China; 2013–2014: Bona Fide Nature of 

Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.’s 

Sales,’’ dated concurrently and hereby adopted by 

this notice (Evonik’s Bona Fide Memorandum). 

last day of the most recently completed 

administrative review under the order.6

Instructions to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection 

As we stated in our Initiation and 

Preliminary Results, we will instruct 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 

end the suspension of liquidation for 

the merchandise covered by the 

revocation on the effective date of this 

notice of revocation, in part, and to 

release any cash deposit or bond, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(g)(4). 

Notification 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.216(e), 351.221(b)(5), and 

351.222(g). 

Dated: April 2, 2015. 

Paul Piquado 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–08112 Filed 4–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–836] 

Glycine From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Preliminary Intent To 

Rescind, in Part; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

the People’s Republic of China (the 

PRC) covering the period of review 

(POR) from March 1, 2013, through 

February 28, 2014. The administrative 

review covers two mandatory 

respondents, Baoding Mantong Fine 

Chemistry Co. Ltd. (Baoding Mantong) 

and Evonik Rexim (Nanning) 

Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Evonik). The 

Department preliminarily finds that 

Baoding Mantong sold subject 

merchandise in the United States at 

prices below the normal value (NV) 

during the POR. The Department 

preliminarily determines that Evonik’s 

sales to the United States were not bona 

fide and is preliminarily rescinding the 

review with respect to Evonik. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dena Crossland or Ericka Ukrow, AD/

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3362 or (202) 482– 

0405, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 30, 2014, the Department 

initiated an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty Order 1 on glycine 

from the PRC.2

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the 

antidumping duty order is glycine, 

which is a free-flowing crystalline 

material, like salt or sugar.3 The subject 

merchandise is currently classifiable 

under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheading 2922.49.4020. The HTSUS 

subheading is provided for convenience 

and customs purposes only; the written 

product description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive.4

Methodology 

The Department is conducting this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

The list of topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

provided as an Appendix to the notice. 

This memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and in the Central 

Records Unit, room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Internet at 

http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The 

signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Bona Fides Analysis 

As discussed in Evonik’s Bona Fide 

Memorandum, the Department 

preliminarily finds that the sales by 

Evonik are not bona fide, and that these 

sales, and absence of factors-ofproduction (FOP) data, do not provide 

a reasonable or reliable basis for 

calculating a dumping margin.5 The 

Department reached this conclusion 

based on the totality of circumstances, 

namely: (a) The atypical nature of 

Evonik’s price; and (b) the atypical 

circumstances surrounding its 

supplier’s inability to provide FOP data. 

Because these non-bona fide sales were 

the only sales of subject merchandise 

that Evonik made during the POR, the 

Department is preliminarily rescinding 

its review of Evonik. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

The Department has preliminarily 

determined that the following dumping 

margin exists for the period March 1, 

2013, through February 28, 2014: 

Exporter 

Dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co. Ltd ............................. 784.48 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES