alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME:                                 JURISDICTION OF FORMATION    DOING BUSINESS AS:
----------------------------------   ---------------------------   -----------------------
<S>                                  <C>                           <C>
Panavision International, L.P.       Delaware                      Panavision;
                                                                   Panavision Florida;
                                                                   Panavision Hollywood;
                                                                   Panavision Wilmington;
                                                                   Lee Filters
Panavision Remote Systems Inc.       California
Keepco I, Inc.                       Delaware
Keepco II, Inc.                      Delaware
Panavision U.K. Holdings, Inc.       Delaware
Victor Duncan, Inc.                  Michigan                      Panavision Chicago;
                                                                   Panavision Dallas
Panavision (1998) Limited            New Zealand
Panavision Europe Limited            United Kingdom                Panavision U.K.;
                                                                   Panavision Ireland;
                                                                   Panavision France;
                                                                   Panavision Alga;
                                                                   Panavision Australia;
                                                                   Lee Filters
Panavision Canada Holdings, Inc.     Ontario, Canada
Panavision New Zealand Limited       New Zealand
Lee Filters Limited                  United Kingdom
Camera Bellows Limited               United Kingdom
Panavision Poland Ltd.               United Kingdom
Joe Dunton Cameras Limited           United Kingdom
Lee Lighting Ltd.                    United Kingdom                Lee Lighting
Panavision (Canada) Corporation      Ontario, Canada               Panavision Canada

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RICHARD THOMAS MORALES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 601 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

(Filed: November 10, 2016) 

No. 16-287V 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

NINA KLEINBERG * UNPUBLISHED 

 * 

Petitioner, * 

 * Decision on Joint Stipulation;

v. * Transverse Myelitis (“TM”);

 * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Howard Gold, Gold Law Firm LLC, Wellesley Hills, MA, for petitioner. 

Lara Englund, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master: 

 On March 1, 2016, Nina Kleinberg [“petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under 

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleged that she developed 

transverse myelitis (“TM”) as a result of receiving an influenza vaccination on or about October 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I 

intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance 

with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified 

as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party 

has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria 

in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for 

redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified 

material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public 

access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. 

Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent 

subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
2

16, 2014. See Stipulation, filed November 10, 2016, at ¶¶ 1-4. Respondent denies that the 

influenza immunization caused petitioner’s injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6. 

 Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On November 10, 2016, the 

parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms. 

 

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment: 

A lump sum of $230,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Nina 

Kleinberg. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be 

available under § 300aa-15(a). 

 I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount 

and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in 

accordance with this decision.3 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth 

 Mindy Michaels Roth 

 Special Master 

 

 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a 

notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.48


 


Comprehensive Facility Contract


 


Contract No. : 2012JIYINZONGXINZIDI12510204


 


Borrower :Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd.


 


Lender : CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


 


Signing Date : July 4, 2012


 


Line of Credit : RMB130, 000,000


 


Contract term : 18 months, From  July 4, 2012
to December 28, 2013


 


Loan Guaranty : Pledge Guarantee


 


- Hebei Chuanglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd entered into The
Maximum Pledge Contract with the accreditor, with the contract no.2012JIYINZUIQUANZHIZIDI12140568.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K




CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) September 13, 2011











DENNY’S CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware
0-18051
13-3487402(State or other jurisdiction of
Commission File No.
(I.R.S. EmployerIncorporation or organization

Identification No.)





203 East Main Street


Spartanburg, South Carolina 29319-0001


(Address of principal executive offices)


(Zip Code)





(864) 597-8000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)




Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations of the registrant under any of the following provisions:




[    ]  Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)




[    ]  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)




[    ]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))




[    ]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
 
 On September 13, 2011, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Denny’s Corporation (the “Company”) appointed George W. Haywood to serve as a director of the Company. Mr. Haywood will be paid the same rate of compensation as the Company’s other non-employee directors, which includes cash payments of $75,000 per year, payable in quarterly installments of $18,750, and an annual award of deferred stock units, valued at $75,000.  Mr. Haywood will receive a pro-rata portion of these cash and equity awards granted to directors for the remaining 2011/2012 board term. There are no arrangements between Mr. Haywood and any other person pursuant to which Mr. Haywood was selected as a director, nor are there any transactions to which the Company or any subsidiary thereof is a party and in which Mr. Haywood has a material interest subject to disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. Mr. Haywood will serve on the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board.









SIGNATURES




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.






Denny's CorporationDate: September 15, 2011
/s/  F. Mark WolfingerF. Mark WolfingerExecutive Vice President,Chief Administrative Officer andChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          28,838                  16,635
<SECURITIES>                                     2,207                   1,527
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,164                   5,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                        95                     154
<INVENTORY>                                      8,595                   5,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,769                  31,702
<PP&E>                                          73,556                  59,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,910                  30,988
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,375                 180,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,798                   5,944
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,000                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           128                     128
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,868                 166,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,375                 180,078
<SALES>                                        104,208                  86,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,221                  90,775
<CGS>                                           67,625                  61,076
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,537                  65,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 370                     284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,252                  21,933
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,678                   8,772
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,574                  13,161
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,574                  13,161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.29                    1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29                    1.03


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

Section 906 Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.

 

 By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

        General Partner

 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral_____________________

Name: Brenda G. Gujral

Title: President of the General Partner and

         Principal Executive Officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.

Date: November 12, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(a)
                                                              Form 10-K for 1996
                                                           File No. 333-08645-01

                      REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To AT&T Capital Corporation:

We have  examined  the  accompanying  management  assertion  that  AT&T  Capital
Corporation has maintained  effective internal controls over financial reporting
of lease and loan servicing  included in the Capita Equipment  Receivables Trust
1996-1  based  on  the  criteria  established in the Internal Control Integrated
Framework  issued by the Committee of Sponsoring  Organizations  of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) as of December 31, 1996.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
obtaining an understanding of the internal controls over financial  reporting of
lease and loan  servicing,  testing  and  evaluating  the design  and  operating
effectiveness of the internal controls, and performing such other procedures  as
we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because  of  inherent   limitations   in  any  internal   controls,  errors   or
irregularities  may  occur  and  not  be  detected.  Also,  projections  of  any
evaluation of the internal  controls over financial  reporting of lease and loan
servicing to  future periods are subject to the risk that the internal  controls
may become inadequate  because of changes in conditions,  or that the degree  of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our  opinion,  the  accompanying  management   assertion  that  AT&T  Capital
Corporation has maintained  effective internal controls over financial reporting
of lease and loan servicing  included in the Capita Equipment  Receivables Trust
1996-1  as  of  December 31, 1996,  is  fairly stated, in all material respects,
based on the criteria  established  in the Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued  by  the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).

                                                   COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

New York, New York
March 28, 1997

<PAGE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB/A for the Year Ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) by New
      Motion, Inc. (“Registrant”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies
      that:




|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
                April 29, 2008
            /s/
                Burton KatzBurton
                KatzChief
                Executive OfficerDate:
                April 29, 2008
            /s/
                Dan HarveyDan
                HarveyChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      New Motion, Inc. and will be retained by New Motion, Inc. and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      23




CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




Cash
      Technologies, Inc.


Los
      Angeles, California




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
      No. 333-413536 on Form S-3, the registration statements (No. 333-117252
      and 333-90680) on Form SB-2 and the registration statements (333-114789,
      Nos. 333-90664, 333-125630, 333-131070, 333-132892, and 333-72654) and
      on
      Form S-8 of our report dated August 17, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial
      statements of Cash Technologies, Inc. as of May 31, 2005 and for the year
      then
      ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. Our
      report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding Cash Technologies Inc's ability
      to continue as a going concern.




Los
      Angeles, California


September
      13, 2007
NUMBER 13-16-00508-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JOSE SALVADOR PUGA QUINTANILLA 

A/K/A JOSE QUINTANILLA A/K/A 

JOSE S. PUGA QUINTANILLA 

A/K/A JOSE SALVADOR PUGA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 197th District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jose Salvador Puga Quintanilla a/k/a Jose Quintanilla a/k/a Jose S. 

Puga Quintanilla a/ka Jose Salvador Puga, attempts to appeal his conviction for 
2

continuous sexual abuse of a child. The trial court has certified that this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On September 27, 2016, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s 

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certification.

On November 28, 2016, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s 

response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is 

incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed 

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

8th day of December, 2016.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick J. Caruso, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: January 26, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    NICK J.
CARUSO                                              
|                       |  |     |  | Nick J. Caruso Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynegy Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Dynegy Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Gilbert M. Stokes, plaintiff in error, *vs.*William A. Maxwell *et al.,*defendants in error.

Where a claimant held land for seven years under a title independent of that of the mortgagor, he obtained a good title by prescription, *aliter,*had he been a privy in estate with the mortgagor.

Claims. Mortgage. Prescription. Before Judge Clark. Lee Superior Court. November Term, 1874.

This case is sufficiently reported in the decision.

Hawkins & Hawkins : Lyon & Jackson, for plaintiff in error.

Nason *&*Davis, for defendants.

*658Warner, Chief Justice.

This case was argued with the case of Wingfield against Davis, and it appears from the record that the claimant, Stokes, did not derive his title to the land from Gilbert, the mortgagor, or from any one claiming under him subsequent to the date of the mortgage, but claimed under an independent title derived from Sutherland to Pace, and from Pace to himself, and it was admitted that the claimant, and those under whom he claimed, had been in the possession of the land for more than seven years before the levy of the mortgage *fi. fa.*If it had been shown that Sutherland and those under whom the claimant derived his title, had purchased the land from Gilbert, the mortgagor, subsequent to the date of the mortgage, then the claimant would have been a *privy*in estate with the mortgagor, and have held the land subject to the mortgage lien, and could not set up a title by prescription as against that mortgage lien, for the reason that he went into' the possession of the land under a title which was incumbered with that lien. But from the evidence in the record the claimant had a good title by prescription under the statute. So far as the record shows the possession of the claimant, under his written evidence of the title, was *adverse*to that of the mortgagor and those claiming under or through him. The only evidence of title in. the mortgagor was the possession of the land when the mortgage was executed, that he exercised acts of ownership over it and claimed it as his own. The court erred in charging the jury, in view of the evidence in the record, “ that his prescriptive title could not avail the claimant against the mortgage lien.”

Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.